HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/17/2013 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning Commission C-4q
*-A- 44r�
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Home of Texas A&M University
Planning & Zoning
Commission
October 17, 2013
City Hall Council Chambers
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas
Workshop Meeting 6:00 PM
Regular Meeting 6:30 PM
(*Or""
AGENDA
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Home ofTexatAd-M University PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
WORKSHOP MEETING
OCTOBER 17, 20139 AT 6:00 P.M.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1101 TEXAS AVENUE
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
1. Call the meeting to order.
2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items.
3. Discussion of Minor and Amending Plats approved by Staff.
• Final Plat— Amending — Sutton Place Lots 1R, 2R, & 3 — 3 Lots — 2300 Earl Rudder
Freeway Case# 13-00900118 (T.Rogers)
• Final Plat—Minor— Spring Creek Townhomes Ph. 2 Block 2 Lots 17R-18R— 2 Lots
4309 Dawn Lynn Drive Case# 13-00900177 (J.Paz)
• Final Plat — Minor — The Business Center at College Station — 2 Lots — 210
Technology Way Case# 13-00900179 (M.Hester)
4. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. [New Development
List]
5. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the status of items within the 2013
P&Z Plan of Work(see attached). (J.Schubert)
6. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an update on the following items:
• An ordinance amending the Unified Development Ordinance to address single-family
parking requirements. The Planning &Zoning Commission heard this item on August
15th and voted 5-0 to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on
September 12th and voted 5-1 to approve the ordinance.
• An ordinance amending the Unified Development Ordinance, changing the street
network and block length requirements. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard
this item on September 5th and voted 5-1 to recommend denial. The City Council
heard this item on September 121h and voted 4-2 to approve the ordinance.
• An ordinance amending the Unified Development Ordinance, changing the one- and
two-family residential zoning districts in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan.
The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on September 5th and voted 6-0
to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on September 12th and
voted 5-1 to approve the ordinance.
• An ordinance amending the College Station Comprehensive Plan by adopting the
Economic Development Master Plan. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this
item on September 5th and voted 6-0 to recommend approval. The City Council heard
this item on September 12th and voted 5-1 to approve the ordinance.
• A rezoning from NG-3 (Residential Northgate) to NG-2 (Transitional Northgate) for
St. Mary's Church in Northgate. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item
on September 5th and voted 6-0 to recommend approval. The City Council heard this
item on September 26th and voted 7-0 to approve the rezoning.
• Adoption of the South Knoll Area Neighborhood Plan. The Planning and Zoning
Commission heard this item on August 15th and voted 5-0 to recommend approval of
the plan with a change to the on-street parking removal option. The City Council
heard this item on September 26th and voted 7-0 to adopt the plan after removing a
proposal to reduce the number of unrelated individuals (from four to two), modifying
the process to request removal of on-street parking, removing the requirement for
additional rental registration information, and removing the prohibition of on-street
parking from 2:00 am until 6:00 am.
7. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming
Meetings.
• Thursday, October 24, 2013 — City Council Meeting — Council Chambers —
Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. (Liaison— Corrier)
• Thursday, November 7, 2013 —P&Z Meeting — Council Chambers — Workshop 6:00
p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m.
8. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review
Board, Joint Parks / Planning & Zoning Subcommittee, BioCorridor Board, and Zoning
District Subcommittee.
9. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning & Zoning Member
may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific
factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation
shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
10. Adjourn.
AGENDA
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Howe of Texas A&M University'
REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 17,20139 AT 6:30 P.M.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1101 TEXAS AVENUE
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
1. Call meeting to order.
2. Pledge of Allegiance.
3. Hear Citizens. At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to
address the Commission on planning and zoning issues not already scheduled on tonight's
agenda. The citizen presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to
accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate
time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information,
ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for
discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for
the record.)
All matters listed under Item 4, Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Planning &
Zoning Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans
and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All
items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. There will not
be separate discussion of these items. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the
Consent Agenda it will be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration.
4. Consent Agenda
4.1 Consideration,possible action, and discussion to approve Meeting Minutes.
• September 19, 2013 —Workshop
• September 19, 2013 —Regular
4.2 Consideration, discussion, and possible action on Absence Requests from meetings.
• Jim Ross —October 17, 2013
4.3 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Indian Lakes Phase
17 consisting of 19 residential lots on approximately 36.4 acres generally located east
of Matoska Ridge Drive in the Indian Lakes Subdivision, approximately one mile
southwest of State Highway 6 South in the City's Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. Case
#13-00900191 (M.Hester)
4.4 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Creek Meadows
Section 3 Phase 1 consisting of 24 residential lots on approximately 5.9 acres
generally located at the corner of Creek Meadows Boulevard North and Greens
Prairie Trail. Case#12-00500009 (M.Hester)
4.5 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Preliminary Plan for Reatta Corner
Subdivision consisting of two commercial lots on approximately 3.661 acres
generally located at 4001 Victoria Avenue, southeast corner of Barron Road and
Victoria Avenue. Case#13-00900186 (J.Paz)
4.6 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Reatta Corner
Subdivision consisting of two commercial lots on approximately 3.661 acres
generally located at 4001 Victoria Avenue, southeast corner of Barron Road and
Victoria Avenue. Case#13-00900187 (J.Paz)
4.7 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Castlegate II Section
103 consisting of 39 single-family residential lots on approximately 9.6 acres
generally located at the intersection of Victoria Avenue and Norwich Drive. Case
#13-00900181 (M.Robinson)
Regular Agenda
5. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent
Agenda by Commission action.
6. Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a waiver request to Unified Development
Ordinance Section 12-8.3.H.2, "Platting and Replatting in Older Subdivisions," regarding
average lot width and public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a
Final Plat for Breezy Heights Addition Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12, Block 1 being a Replat of
Breezy Heights Addition 1.26 acres, Block 1 consisting of 4 lots on approximately 1.3
acres located at 900 Hereford Street. Case# 13-00900159 (T.Rogers)
7. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an amendment to
Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by rezoning approximately
7.4 acres in the Crawford Burnett League, Abstract No. 7, College Station, Brazos
County, Texas. Said tract being the same tract of land as described by a deed to Texas
A&M Foundation Trust Company, trustee of the Wanona Carol Randolph charitable
remainder unitrust recorded in Volume 9361, Page 87 of the Official Public Records of
Brazos County, Texas, more generally located at 2900 North Graham Road from PDD
Planned Development District to BPI Business Park Industrial. Case #13-00900189
(T.Rogers)
8. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance
amending the Comprehensive Plan — Future Land Use & Character Map from
Institutional/Public to General Commercial for approximately 4.4 acres for the property
located at 1600 University Drive East at the corner of University Drive East and
Glenhaven Drive. Case#13-00900196 (M.Hester)
9. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance
amending the Comprehensive Plan — Future Land Use & Character Map from Estate to
General Commercial for approximately 5.4 acres for the property located at 1201 Norton
Lane at the corner of Wellborn Road and Norton Lane. Case#13-00900193 (M.Hester)
10. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the annual review
of the Comprehensive Plan and the Unified Development Ordinance. (B.Cowell)
11. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning & Zoning Member
may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific
factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation
shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
12. Adjourn.
2013 Planning & Zoning Commission Plan of Work
Comprehensive Plan Implementation
Implementation of Adopted Plans
Summary: Project Dates:
Implementation of adopted master plans and 2/14/13: Council discussion regarding board
neighborhood, district, and corridor plans, namely: compositions for Medical District MMD#1 .
Central College Station, Eastgate, and Southside Area 6/20/2013: Discussion regarding CIP development
neighborhood plans, and Bicycle, Pedestrian, and process at P&Z Regular meeting.
Greenways, Parks and Recreation, Water, Waste 7/18/13: Recommendation for FY14 CIP proposal at
Water, and Medical District master plans. P&Z Regular meeting.
10/17/13: Comprehensive Plan Annual Review at
P&Z.
10/24/13: Comprehensive Plan Annual Review at
Council.
Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff lAnticipated Completion: On-going
Wellborn Community Plan
Summary: Project Dates:
Development of a district plan for the recently annexed 4/1/13: Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory
Wellborn area that contains elements of a rural historic Board recommended approval of the Plan.
community with a unique character that residents of the 4/4/13: P&Z recommended approval of proposed plan.
area desire to retain. 4/25/13: Council adopted plan.
Staff Assigned: M. Robinson Completed: April 2013
Economic Development Master Plan
Summary: Project Dates:
Development of a Master Plan to provide consistent 2/7/13: Master Plan update at P&Z Workshop.
direction on how the City will help ensure its economic 7/18/13: P&Z Workshop on draft Master Plan.
health for years to come while providing a positive 9/5/13: P&Z recommended approval of plan.
business development environment. 1 9/12/13 Council adopted plan.
Staff Assigned: R. Heye Completed: September 2013
South Knoll Area Neighborhood Plan
Summary: Project Dates:
8/5/13: Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory
Development of a neighborhood plan for a number of Board recommendation on proposed plan.
unique neighborhood areas. The plan area is generally
bounded by Holleman Drive, Welsh Avenue, Wellborn 8/15/13: P&Z recommended approval of plan with
Road, Harvey Mitchell Parkway, and Texas Avenue. some conditions.
9/26/13: Council adopted an amended plan.
Staff Assigned: J. Prochazka, M. Hester Completed: September 2013
Page 1 of 4
Neighborhood Parking
Summary: Project Dates:
Analyze neighborhood parking issues by engaging 2/21/13: Task Force Final Report presented to P&Z.
stakeholders and working in a Joint Task Force 2/28/13: Task Force Final Report presented to
Subcommittee with Council. Implement recommended Council.
solutions. 7/9/13-8/5/13: Stakeholder comment period.
9/5/13: P&Z recommended approval of ordinance.
9/12/13: Council adopted proposed ordinance.
Staff Assigned: B. Cowell, T. Rogers Completed: September 2013
Residential Zoning Districts
Summary: Project Dates:
Create and adopt new residential zoning districts to 4/9/13: Public meeting regarding single family and
implement the future land use and character duplex zoning concepts.
designations identified in the Comprehensive Plan. 4/19/13: P&Z Subcommittee meeting.
5/31/13: P&Z Subcommittee meeting.
6/7/13-7/7/13: Stakeholder comment period for draft
zoning ordinance changes.
9/5/13: P&Z recommended approval of ordinance.
9/12/13: Council adopted proposed ordinance.
Staff Assigned: J. Prochazka, T. Rogers JAnticipated Completion: Summer 2013
Medical District Zoning Districts
Summary: Project Dates:
Create and adopt Medical and Urban Village zoning 5/2/13: Presentation regarding Plan implementation at
districts to implement the new future land use and P&Z Workshop.
character designations established by the Medical 8/15/13: Presentation of district concepts at P&Z
District Master Plan. I Workshop.
Staff Assigned: J. Prochazka, M. Robinson JAnticipated Completion:
Research and Education
Plan Implementation
Summary: Project Dates:
The linkage between the Comprehensive Plan, Master
Plans, and Neighborhood, District, and Corridor Plans.
The linkage between regulations, funding, etc and plan
implementation.
• Overview of concept—provide a review of how this 5/2/13: Discussion at P&Z Regular meeting.
system is built in College Station and intended to be
used (link between vision, comprehensive plan,
strategic plan, etc).
Page 2 of 4
Link between Comprehensive Plan and Master Plans 5/2/13: Discussion at P&Z Regular meeting.
—this would include an overview of each of the adopted
Master Plans and a demonstration of how for example
we plan wastewater to serve the proposed land use and
how for example the BPG Master Plan, if implemented
responds to the desired character of the City, etc.
Link between adopted plans and regulations/ 6/6/13: Discussion at P&Z Workshop.
standards —this would include examples of how we use
regs (for example new zoning districts or block length)
to further the objectives/goals contained in the policy
documents/plans and to help highlight how the success
of those plans is impacted by the regs selected (or not)
—for example how a certain type of block length yields
a certain development pattern and connectivity whereas
a different block length will yield a different pattern.
Link between plans and funding—this would include 6/20/13: Discussion at P&Z Regular meeting.
how the plans have been fiscally constrained and how
funding plays a role in their successful implementation
and how if not adequately funded they will fall short of
expectations.
Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff JAnticipated Completion:
Character and Community Design
Summary: Project Dates:
The purpose and definition of community character,
community design, and the role they play in community
vitality and success.
Overview of community character (versus just a focus 5/16/13: Discussion at P&Z Workshop.
on land use/protection from incompatible uses)—this
would include an overview of what our plans say about
this and again what best practices are in these areas.
Link between community design and livability—this 11/21/13: Discussion at P&Z Workshop.
would be an overview of what the principles of good
community design are, where these principles have (or
have not) been used in College Station and where
livability has been improved (or negatively impacted)as
a result.
Link between community design and economic vitality 11/21/13: Discussion at P&Z Workshop.
—this would be an overview of how community design
impacts land values (and thus tax revenues)creates
new economic opportunities, etc.
Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff JAnticipated Completion:
Page 3 of 4
Affordable Housing and Community Development
Summary: Project Dates:
Receive updates regarding affordable housing and
other community development efforts.
Overview of the City's current approach to addressing 7/18/13: Discussion at P&Z Workshop.
affordable housing needs.
Overview of the Department's revised approach to 7/18/13: Discussion at P&Z Workshop.
community development—this would be an overview of
a Community Development Master Plan.
On-going updates as needed (annual action plan, 8/8/13: Council adopted Annual Action Plan.
Community Development Master Plan, etc).
Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff JAnticipated Completion: On-going
Single-Family and Multi-Family Housing Markets
Summary: Project Dates:
Discuss impact of large amount of new multi-family
units and single-family dwellings being used for student
rental purposes on the local housing market.
Overview of the issue/questions —this would be an 5/16/13: Discussion of methodology and scope at P&Z
overview of what the perceived issues/questions are Regular meeting.
and what others might have looked at in other
communities when asking similar questions to devise a
methodology.
Overview of the new multi-family market—this would
be what is being built, by whom, how are they
performing, who is moving into them, etc. may include
surveys, focus groups, guest speakers, etc.
Overview of existing multi-family market—this would
be what exists, who owns it, what are they doing to
maintain and rent it, how are they performing, who is
moving into them, etc. may include surveys, focus
groups, guest speakers, etc.
Overview of the single-family rental market—what is
being built, who is managing what and how, who is
renting, what are the implications/benefits of this
market, etc. may include surveys, focus groups, guest
speakers, etc.
What, if any, response are needed/appropriate by the
City to address issues.
Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff Anticipated Completion:
Page 4 of 4
MINUTES
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Home of Tmo AdM Univrniiy' Workshop Meeting
September 19, 2013, 6:00 p.m.
City Hall Council Chambers
College Station, Texas
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Mike Ashfield, Jodi Warner, Bo Miles, Brad Corrier, Jim
Ross, and Jerome Rektorik
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: None
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Blanche Brick
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Bob Cowell, Lance Simms, Molly Hitchcock, Debbie Eller,
Jennifer Prochazka, Jason Schubert, Matt Robinson, Morgan Hester, Teresa Rogers, Jenifer Paz,
Alan Gibbs, Carol Cotter, Danielle Singh, Erika Bridges, Joe Guerra, Adam Falco, April Howard,
Timothy Green, and Brittany Caldwell
1. Call the meeting to order.
Chairman Ashfield called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items.
Senior Planner Robinson said that there was an alternate proposal for Regular Agenda
Item 8 that would be supported by Staff along with the waivers.
3. Discussion of Minor and Amending Plats approved by Staff.
• Final Plat — Minor — McGill Subdivison — 1 Lot — 7713 Appomattox Case # 13-
00900120 (M.Hester)
There was no discussion regarding Plats approved by Staff.
4. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. [New Development
List]
There was no discussion regarding new development applications.
5. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the status of items within the 2013
P&Z Plan of Work(see attached). (J.Schubert)
Principal Planner Schubert gave an update regarding the P&Z Plan of Work
6. Presentation and discussion regarding the categorization and definition of commercial
uses. (M.Robinson)
September 19,2013 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 2
Senior Planner Robinson gave a presentation regarding the categorization and definition of
commercial uses.
There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding the presentation.
It was decided that the item would be discussed further at the Planning & Zoning
Commission Retreat and would be included in the development of the 2014 P&Z Plan of
Work.
7. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming
Meetings.
• Thursday, September 26, 2013 — City Council Meeting — Council Chambers —
Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. (Liaison—Warner)
• Thursday, October 17, 2013 — P&Z Meeting — Council Chambers — Workshop 6:00
p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m.
There was no discussion regarding upcoming meetings.
8. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review
Board, Joint Parks / Planning & Zoning Subcommittee, South Knoll Area Neighborhood
Plan Resource Team, BioCorridor Board, and Zoning District Subcommittee.
There was no discussion regarding the above meetings.
9. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning & Zoning Member
may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific
factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation
shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
There was no discussion regarding future agenda items.
10. Adjourn.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:33 p.m.
Approved: Attest:
Mike Ashfield, Chairman Brittany Caldwell,Admin. Support Specialist
Planning&Zoning Commission Planning&Development Services
September 19,2013 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 2
(*OF""
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION MINUTES
Home of Tffz A&M UniversiV* PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
September 19, 2013, 7:00 p.m.
City Hall Council Chambers
College Station, Texas
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Mike Ashfield, Jodi Warner, Bo Miles, Brad Corrier, Jim
Ross, and Jerome Rektorik
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: None
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Blanche Brick
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Bob Cowell, Lance Simms, Molly Hitchcock, Debbie Eller,
Jennifer Prochazka, Jason Schubert, Matt Robinson, Morgan Hester, Teresa Rogers, Jenifer Paz,
Alan Gibbs, Carol Cotter, Danielle Singh, Erika Bridges, Joe Guerra, Adam Falco, April
Howard, Timothy Green, and Brittany Caldwell
1. Call Meeting to Order
Chairman Ashfield called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Hear Citizens
No one spoke.
4. Consent Agenda
All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations.
4.1 Consideration, possible action, and discussion to approve Meeting Minutes.
• September 5, 2013 —Workshop
• September 5, 2013 —Regular
4.2 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Castlegate II Section
203 consisting of 32 single-family residential lots on approximately 10.5 acres
generally located west of the Castlegate Subdivision along Etonbury Avenue. Case
#13-00900163 (M. Robinson)
September 19,2013 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 4
4.3 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Barracks II Phase 102
consisting of 27 single-family residential lots on approximately 3.8 acres generally
located north of the Buena Vida Subdivision along Capps Drive. Case #12-00900258
(M. Robinson)
4.4 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Barracks II Phase 200
consisting of 28 single-family residential lots on approximately 6 acres generally
located east of Holleman Drive South along Deacon Drive West. Case #13-00900073
(M. Robinson)
4.5 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Preliminary Plat for Indian Lakes
Phase 18 consisting of four residential lots on approximately 17.93 acres generally
located south of Anasazi Bluff Drive in the Indian Lakes Subdivision, approximately
one mile southwest of State Highway 6 in the City's Extraterritorial Jurisdiction.
Case #13-00900131 (M. Hester)
4.6 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Indian Lakes Phase
16 consisting of eight residential lots on approximately 23.3 acres generally located
east of Mesa Verde Drive in the Indian Lakes Subdivision, approximately one mile
southwest of State Highway 6 in the City's Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. Case #13-
00900124 (M. Hester)
4.7 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Great Oaks Phase 13
consisting of five residential lots on approximately 9.2 acres generally located west of
Arboleda Drive in the Great Oaks Subdivision. Case#13-00900174 (M.Hester)
4.8 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for University Heights
Phase 2 & 3 consisting of 66 residential lots on approximately 12.525 acres generally
located west of Holleman Drive South in the University Heights Subdivision. Case
#13-00900101 (J. Paz)
Commissioner Rektorik motioned to approve Consent Agenda Items 4.1 — 4.8.
Commissioner Miles seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0).
Regular Agenda
5. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent
Agenda by Commission action.
No items were removed from the Consent Agenda.
6. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a waiver request to Section 8.2.K
"Sidewalks" of the Unified Development Ordinance, and public hearing, presentation,
possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Woodland Acres Lots 1R and 2R,
being a replat of Woodland Acres Lot IA and a portion of Lot 2, consisting of two lots on
approximately 4.5 acres located at 703 Francis Drive. Case#13-00900170 (M.Robinson)
September 19,2013 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 4
Senior Planner Robinson presented the waiver request to the sidewalk requirements and
the replat and recommended approval.
Chairman Ashfield opened the public hearing.
No one spoke during the public hearing.
Chairman Ashfield closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Miles motioned to approve the waiver request to the sidewalk
requirements. Commissioner Corrier seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0).
Commissioner Ashfield motioned to approve the replat. Commissioner Warner
seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0).
7. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Greens
Prairie Center Phase 2A Lots 1R-14R and Common Area 1-4, Block 5, being a replat of
Greens Prairie Center Phase 2A Lot 1, Block 5 consisting of 14 lots on approximately 28
acres located at 1501 Arrington Road. Case#13-00900071 (M.Robinson)
Senior Planner Robinson presented the replat and recommended approval.
Chairman Ashfield opened the public hearing.
No one spoke during the public hearing.
Chairman Ashfield closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Warner motioned to approve the replat. Commissioner Miles
seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0).
8. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding waiver requests to Section 8.2.G.2
"Blocks" of the Unified Development Ordinance, and presentation, possible action, and
discussion on a Preliminary Plan for Caprock Crossing Phase 5 consisting of one
commercial lot on approximately 2.8 acres located at 1780 Greens Prairie Road West.
Case#13-00900157 (M.Robinson)
Senior Planner Robinson presented the waiver requests to the block length and block-
perimeter requirements and the Preliminary Plan and recommended approval with the
condition that a 40-foot Public Access Easement be provided with a driveway that is 36-
feet wide to allow two-way traffic with a striped center turn lane.
There was general discussion amongst the Commission and Staff regarding the driveway
on the property.
Jesse Durden, 2809 Earl Rudder Freeway South, College Station, Texas, explained to the
Commission why he was requesting a public access easement in lieu of a public way. He
September 19,2013 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 4
said that they would lose a large portion of the property in the middle of the tract if they
would have to push the internal driveway to the north.
Commissioner Corrier motioned to approve the waiver requests to block length and
block perimeter as presented by Staff. Commissioner Miles seconded the motion,
motion passed (6-0).
Commissioner Corrier motioned to approve the Preliminary Plan. Commissioner
Miles seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0).
9. Presentation, possible action, and discussion on an Impact Fee Update Report for Impact
Fees 92-01, 97-01, 97-02B, 99-01, and 03-02. (C.Cotter)
Senior Assistant City Engineer Cotter gave an Impact Fee Update Report for Impact Fees
92-01, 97-01, 97-0213, 99-01, and 03-02.
Commissioner Warner motioned to recommend approval of the report.
Commissioner Miles seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0).
10. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning & Zoning Member
may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific
factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation
shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
There was no discussion regarding future agenda items.
11. Adjourn.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
Approved: Attest:
Mike Ashfield, Chairman Brittany Caldwell,Admin. Support Specialist
Planning&Zoning Commission Planning &Development Services
September 19,2013 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 4
(*01""
CITY OF COLLEGE,STATION
Planning ear Development Services
Absence Request Form
For Elected and Appointed Officers
Name Jim Ross
Request Submitted on 9/23/2013
I will not be in attendance at the meeting on 10/17/2013
for the reason specified: (Date)
Out of town.
Signature Jim Ross
(i
*Ar�
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
FINAL PLAT
for
Indian Lakes Ph 17
13-00900191
SCALE: 19 residential lots on approximately 36.36 acres
LOCATION: Generally located east of Matoska Ridge Drive in the Indian Lakes
Subdivision
ZONING: N/A (ETJ)
APPLICANT: Travis Martinek, Smiling Mallard Development, Ltd.
PROJECT MANAGER: Morgan Hester, Staff Planner
mhester@cstx.gov
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat.
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 1 of 3
October 17, 2013
R
e
yxw
T
e �
i'7, ice;
a
v .x
z
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: N/A (ETJ)
Zoning: N/A (ETJ)
Master Planned: Master Plan approved in 2002. Subsequent preliminary plats and
final plats have been approved every year since 2004.
Preliminary Plat: The preliminary plat was approved in July 2013.
Site Development: Vacant. Nineteen residential lots are proposed, ranging from 1.15
acres to 2.69 acres.
COMMENTS
Parkland Dedication: This development was approved as a Master Plan in the ETJ prior
to parkland dedication requirements being applicable in the ETJ.
Therefore, no parkland dedication is required.
Greenways: N/A
Pedestrian Connectivity: This site is located in the ETJ so sidewalks are not required.
Bicycle Connectivity: This site is located in the ETJ and no specific facilities for bicycle
connectivity are required.
Impact Fees: N/A
REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance: The
Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Rural. The City, however, does not have land
use authority in the ETJ. The proposed lots will have access through rural residential
streets that connect to Indian Lakes Drive, a Major Collector on the Thoroughfare Plan.
2. Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The Preliminary Plat complies with the
applicable Subdivision Regulations contained in the Unified Development Ordinance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Application
2. Copy of Final Plat
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 3 of 3
October 17, 2013
• ` FOR OFFI E USE O L�
CASE NO.:
DATE SUBM TTED: �� 1
TIME:
CITY OF COII EGE,STATION
STAFF:
Home of Texas Ae-M University'
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
(Check one) ❑ Minor ❑ Amending Final ❑ vacating ❑Replat
($700) ($700) ($932) ($932) ($932)
Is this plat in the ETJ? 0 Yes ❑ No Is this plat Commercial ❑ or Residential
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
$700-$932 Final Plat Application Fee(see above).
❑ $233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable).
❑ $600 (minimum) Development Permit Application / Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is
1% of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is>$600, the balance is
due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit).
Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and
may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
I c�Fourteen (14)folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.)
❑ Two(2) copies of the grading, drainage, and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report.
❑ Two(2)copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents(if applicable).
❑ Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable).
Title report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate
current within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership, liens,
encumbrances, etc.
Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D.
The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
NOTE: A mylar of the approved preliminary plan must be on file before a final plat application will be considered
complete. If the mylar is submitted with the final plat application, it shall be considered a submittal for the
preliminary plan project and processed and reviewed as such. Until the mylar has been confirmed by staff
to be correct, the final plat application will be considered incomplete.
Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference N/A
NAME OF PROJECT Indian Lakes Phase 17
ADDRESS East of intersection of Matoska Ridge and Kiowa Cove
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT:
East of intersection of Matoska Ridge and Kiowa Cove
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name Travis Martinek E-mail travis@clarkewyndham.com
Street Address 3608 East 29th Street, Suite 100
City Bryan State Texas Zip Code 77802
Phone Number (979) 846-4384 Fax Number (979) 846-1461
1/11 Page 1 of 9
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (All owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple
owners):
Name Smiling Mallard Development, Ltd. E-mail travis@clarkewyndham.com
Street Address 3608 East 29th Street, Suite 100
City Bryan State Texas Zip Code 77802
Phone Number (979)846-4384 Fax Number (979) 846-1461
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name McClure &Browne, Inc. E-mail kevinm@mcclurebrowne.com
Street Address 1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103
City College Station State Texas Zip Code 77845
Phone Number (979) 693-3838 Fax Number (979) 693-2554
Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property? ❑X Yes ❑ No
Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so, please provide the Volume NIA and Page No. N/A
Total Acreage 36.357 Total No. of Lots 18 R-O-W Acreage 4.180
Existing Use Vacant Proposed Use Residential
Number of Lots By Zoning District NIA / N/A N/A / N/A N/A / N/A
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
N/A / N/A N/A / N/A N/A / N/A N/A / N/A
Floodplain Acreage 0.00
Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? r Yes r No
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
[X Yes
r No
If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name: Indian Lakes
City Project Number(if known): Unknown
Date/Timeframe when submitted: 2000
1/11 Page 2 of 9
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan (if applicable):
/A
Requested waiver to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable):
/A
Regarding the waiver request, explain how:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the
subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.
/A
2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
/A
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other
property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
/A
4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance.
/A
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable):
1. r An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way;
2. r The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the
purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan;
3. F_ A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve(12) months;
4. F_ Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate/
rural context;
5. r When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Master Plan;
1/11 Page 3 of 9
6. r The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and
Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO; or
7. r The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway/Expressway as designated by Map 6.6,
Thoroughfare Plan-Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Detailed explanation of condition identified above:
N/A
NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the
same time by the Planning &Zoning Commission.
Requested Oversize ParticipationN/A
Total Linear Footage of Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
Proposed Public:
ACREAGE:
Streets
No. of acres to be dedicated +$ development fee
Sidewalks
No. of acres in floodplain
Sanitary Sewer Lines
No. of acres in detention
Water Lines
No. of acres in greenways
Channels
OR
Storm Sewers
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
Bike Lanes/Paths
No. of SF Dwelling Units X$ _ $
(date)Approved by Parks& Recreation Advisory Board
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are
true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more
than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. LIEN
HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as
described above.
9 /5 113
Signature an it Date
1/11 Page 4 of 9
FINAL PLAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
(Requirements based on field survey and marked by monuments and markers.)
OX Drawn on 24"x 36"sheet to scale of 100' per inch.
X❑ Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in
relationship to College Station and its City Limits. No scale required but include north arrow.
0 Title Block with the following information:
❑X Name and address of subdivider, recorded owner, planner, engineer and surveyor.
QX Proposed name of subdivision. (Subdivision name&street names will be approved through Brazos
County 911.)
❑X Date of preparation.
FX Engineer's scale in feet.
❑X Total area intended to be developed.
❑X North Arrow.
X� Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines.
0 If more than 1 sheet, an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or
larger.
0 All applicable certifications based on the type of final plat.
❑X Ownership and Dedication
❑X Surveyor and/or Engineer
City Engineer(and City Planner, if a minor plat)
❑x Planning and Zoning Commission (delete if minor plat)
❑X Brazos County Clerk
❑X Brazos County Commissioners Court Approval (ETJ Plats only)
7X If submitting a replat where there are existing improvements, submit a survey of the subject property
showing the improvements to ensure that no encroachments will be created.
X❑ If using private septic systems, add a general note on the plat that no private sewage facility may be
installed on any lot in this subdivision without the issuance of a license by the Brazos County
Health Unit under the provisions of the private facility regulations adopted by the Commissioner's
Court of Brazos County, pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.084 of the Texas Water Code.
XI Location of the 100-Year Floodplain and floodway, if applicable, according to the most recent available
data.
0 Lot corner markers and survey monuments (by symbol) and clearly tied to basic survey data.
0 Matches the approved preliminary plan or qualifies as minor amendments (UDO Section 3.3.E.2).
0 The location and description with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii, area, center
angle, degree of curvature, tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the
following: (Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a
boundary with the subdivision, as well as, those within the subdivision).
Existing Proposed
❑X ❑X Streets. Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac, stubbed out streets must end into a temp
turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet.
❑X Public and private R.O.W. locations and widths. (All existing and proposed R.O.W.'s
sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan.)
❑X ❑X Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance.
1/11 Page 8 of 9
Existing Proposed
❑X ❑X Alleys.
Easements.
0 ❑X A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block (numbered sequentially).
❑X ❑X Parkland dedication/greenbelt area/park linkages. All proposed dedications must be
reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and documentation of their
recommendation provided prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration.
❑ Construction documents for all public infrastructure drawn on 24"x 36" sheets and properly
sealed by a Licensed Texas Professional Engineer that include the following:
❑ Street, alley and sidewalk plans, profiles and sections. One sheet must show the overall
street, alley and/or sidewalk layout of the subdivision. (may be combined with other
utilities).
❑ Sewer Design Report.
❑ Sanitary sewer plan and profile showing depth and grades. One sheet must show the
overall sewer layout of the subdivision. (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility
master plan and any future growth areas.)
❑ Water Design Report and/or Fire Flow Report.
❑ Water line plan showing fire hydrants, valves, etc. with plan and profile lines showing
depth and grades. One sheet must show the overall water layout of the subdivision.
(Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth
areas.)
❑ Storm drainage system plan with contours, street profile, inlets, storm sewer and
drainage channels, with profiles and sections. Drainage and runoff areas, and runoff
based on 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 year rain intensity. Detailed drainage structure design,
channel lining design & detention if used. One sheet must show the overall drainage
layout of the subdivision.
❑ Detailed cost estimates for all public infrastructure listed above sealed by Texas P.E.
❑ Letter of completion for public infrastructure or guarantee/surety in accordance with UDO
Section 8.6.
❑ Drainage Report with a Technical Design Summary.
❑ Erosion Control Plan (must be included in construction plans).
❑X All off-site easements necessary for infrastructure construction must be shown on the final plat with a
volume and page listed to indicate where the separate instrument easements were filed.
Separate instrument easements must be provided in recordable form to the City prior to being scheduled
for P&Z Commission consideration.
❑X Are there impact fees associated with this development? ❑ Yes ❑X No
Impact fees must be paid prior to building permit.
❑X Will any construction occur in TxDOT rights-of-way? ❑ Yes No
If yes, TxDOT permit must be submitted along with the construction documents.
NOTE: 1. We will be requesting the corrected Final Plat to be submitted in digital form if available prior to filing
the plat at the Courthouse.
2. If the construction area is greater than 5 acres, EPA Notice of Intent(NOI) must be submitted prior to
issuance of a development permit.
Print Form
1/11 Page 9 or 9
J
9
.............. .. ...
2i s a s rys nip
�An
my
Jill; 9 i
. '5
-f HI, Ioifl;!
24
'J ""'1"1 -t A"
rin
'—O ,Eli
O!A-
RunAe-
'14
VII
flv
I"k
14 M,
zz
HM
4
I h
;42.
4 s8
6j
19
eE
IVA
If
Al
ig
P.H IE
s
(i
*Ar�
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
FINAL PLAT
for
Creek Meadows Sec 3 Ph 1
12-00500009
SCALE: 24 residential lots on approximately 5.9 acres
LOCATION: Generally located at the corner of Creek Meadows Boulevard
North and Greens Prairie Trail.
ZONING: PDD Planned Development District
APPLICANT: Rabon Metcalf, RME Consulting Engineers
PROJECT MANAGER: Morgan Hester, Staff Planner
mhester@cstx.gov
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat.
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 1 of 3
October 17, 2013
!Rt
`,
n
*41
40, w
t 37
d.:
s ..kms CF)
p ,
N
LO
` 1 m
m y W
W
fJ]
0
Y
w
LLI
w
SS�rd Nva C
(7
LIJ
LLI
S
` LU
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 2 of 3
October 17, 2013
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: March 2008
Zoning: PDD Planned Development District
Preliminary Plat: Master Plan approved in 2006. Subsequent Preliminary Plat have
been revised in January 2008, September 2008, November 2008,
and January 2009.
Site Development: The site is currently undeveloped.
COMMENTS
Parkland Dedication: This development was approved as a Master Plan in the ETJ prior
to parkland dedication requirements being applicable in the ETJ.
Therefore, no parkland dedication is required.
Greenways: N/A
Pedestrian Connectivity: This development was approved as a Master Plan in the ETJ prior
to parkland dedication requirements being applicable in the ETJ.
Therefore, no sidewalks are required; however, they have been
provided throughout the Creek Meadows development.
Bicycle Connectivity: This development was approved as a Master Plan in the ETJ prior
to parkland dedication requirements being applicable in the ETJ.
Therefore, no bicycle connectivity is required.
Impact Fees: N/A
REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance: The
Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Restricted Suburban. The proposed lots will
have access through streets that connect to Creek Meadows Boulevard, a Minor Collector
on the Thoroughfare Plan, and Greens Prairie Trail, a Minor Arterial on the Thoroughfare
Plan.
2. Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The Final Plat complies with the applicable
Subdivision Regulations contained in the Unified Development Ordinance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Application
2. Copy of Final Plat
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 3 of 3
October 17, 2013
i
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO.:
DATE SUBMITTED:
(*- Or4"
TIME: a _"
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Horne of Texas A6-M University® STAFF:
FINAL T APPLICATION
(Check one) ❑ Minor ❑ Amending Z Final ❑ Vacating ❑Replat
($700) ($700) ($932) ($932) ($932)
Is this plat in the ETJ? ❑ Yes ❑x No Is this plat Commercial ❑ or Residential 0
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
❑x $700-$932 Final Plat Application Fee(see above).
❑ $233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable).
❑x $600 (minimum) Development Permit Application / Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is
1%of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is> $600, the balance is
due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit).
❑x Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and
may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
❑x Fourteen(14)folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.)
® Two(2) copies of the grading, drainage,and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report.
❑x Two(2)copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents(if applicable).
❑ Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats(if applicable).
❑x Title report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate
current within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership, liens,
encumbrances, etc.
❑x Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D.
n The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
NOTE: A mylar of the approved preliminary plan must be on file before a final plat application will be considered
complete. If the mylar is submitted with the final plat application, it shall be considered a submittal for the
preliminary plan project and processed and reviewed as such. Until the mylar has been confirmed by staff
to be correct,the final plat application will be considered incomplete.
Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference
NAME OF PROJECT Creek Meadows-Section 3, Phase One
ADDRESS I Z l ° ,
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT:
Creek Meadows Master Planned Subdivision
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION(Primary contact for the project):
Name RME Consulting Engineers E-mail ration@rmengineer.com
Street Address PO Box 9253
City College Station State TX Zip Code 77842
Phone Number (979) 764-0704 Fax Number (979) 764-0704
1/11 Page 1 of 9
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (All owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple
owners):
Creek reek Meadow Partners, L.P. (c%Randy Lowry) E-mail Chris@oldhamgoodwin,com
Street Address 2800 South Texas Avenue, Suite 401
City Bryan State TX Zip Code 77802
Phone Number (979)268-2000 Fax Number (979) 846-7020
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name Same As Applicant E-mail
Street Address
City State Zip Code
Phone Number Fax Number
Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property? X❑ Yes ❑ No
Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property?If so, please provide the Volume 7863 and Page No. 072
Total Acreage 5.934 Total No.of Lots 24 R-O-W Acreage 1.039
Existing Use Vacant Proposed Use Single-Family Residential
Number of Lots By Zoning District 24 / PDD
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
0.181 / PDD
Floodplain Acreage 0.0
Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels)on the property? F Yes rX No
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s)and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
Yes
F_ No
If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications(provide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name: Creek Meadows-Master Planned Subdivision
City Project Number(in known):
Date/Timeframe when submitted: October 2006
1/11 Page 2 of 9
I
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan(if applicable):
Not Applicable
Requested waiver to subdivision regulations and reason for same if applicable):
Not Applicable
Regarding the waiver request, explain how:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the
subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.
Not Applicable
2.The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
Not Applicable
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other
property in the area,or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
Not Applicable
4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance.
Not Applicable
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition(if applicable):
1. C- An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way;
2. F- The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or Is not in keeping with the
purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan;
3. F A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve(12)months;
4. F- Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate/
rural context;
5. [— When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Master Plan;
1/11 Page 3 of 9
i
6. The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and
Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO; or
7. The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway I Expressway as designated by Map 6.6,
Thoroughfare Plan- Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Detailed explanation of condition identified above:
NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the
same time by the Planning&Zoning Commission.
Requested Oversize Participation Not Applicable
Total Linear Footage of Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
Proposed Public:
847 Streets ACREAGE:
9939 Sidewalks No. of acres to be dedicated +$ development fee
636Sanitary Sewer Lines
No. of acres in floodplain
774 Water Lines No. of acres in detention
Channels No. of acres in greenways
728 OR
Storm Sewers
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
Bike Lanes I Paths
No. of SF Dwelling Units X$ _ $
(date)Approved by Parks&Recreation Advisory Board
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are
true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more
than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner Is a company, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. LIEN
HOLDERS Identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as
described above.
Sig ature a Date
1/11 Page 4 of 9
' f
CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT
Owner Certification:
1. No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued.
2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein.
3. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re-issued.
4. Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued.
5. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance.
6. Other permits may be required to fulfill local, state, and federal requirements. Owner will obtain or show
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOI and SWPPP.
7. If required, Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-
pour)and post construction.
8. Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify
compliance.
9. If, stormwater mitigation is required, including detention ponds proposed as part of this project, it shall be
designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
10. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken
to insure that all debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or
existing drainage facilities.All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to
and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project.All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the
City of College Station shall apply.
11. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines Technical Specifications, and Standard Details.All development has been designed in
accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal
Regulations.
12. Release of plans to (name or firm)is authorized for bidding purposes
only. I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on
contractor signature on approved Development Permit.
13. 1,THE OWNER,AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN,AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR
THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APP (CATION,ARE,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,TRUE, AND
ACCURATE.
Property Owns (s) Date
Engineer Certification:
1. The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds, proposed as part
of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence.
2. 1 will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local, State and Federal Permits prior to construction
including NOI and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES: i.e., projects over 10 acres may
require a sedimentation basin.
3. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station,Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances
of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations.
4. 1, THE ENGINEER,AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT P MIT APPLICATION,ARE,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,TRUE,AND
AC
7
Enginee Date
1/11 Page 5 of 9
The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas.
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, Fill/Grading Permits, and Clearing Only
Permits:*
A. I, Not Applicable certify, as demonstrated in the attached drainage study,that the
alterations or development covered by this permit,shall not:
(i) increase the Base Flood elevation;
(ii) create additional areas of Special Flood Hazard Area;
(iii) decrease the conveyance capacity to that part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway
and where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood event is greater than one foot per second.This area can
also be approximated to be either areas within 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or
areas where the depth of from the BFE to natural ground is 18 inches or greater;
(iv) reduce the Base Flood water storage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond
the floodway and conveyance area where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than
one foot per second without acceptable compensation as set forth in the City of College Station Code of
Ordinances, Chapter 13 concerning encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area; nor
(v) increase Base Flood velocities.
beyond those areas exempted by ordinance in Section 5.11.3a of Chapter 13 Code of Ordinances.
Engineer Date
Initial
* If a platting-status exemption to this requirement is asserted, provide written justification under separate
letter in lieu of certification.
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, and Fill/Grading Permits:
B. I, Rabon A. Metcalf, P.E. , certify to the following:
(i) that any nonresidential or multi-family structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is
designed to prevent damag o the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100-year storm.
Engineer Date
Additional certification for Floodway Encroachments:
C. 1, Not Applicable , certify that the construction, improvement, or fill covered by this
permit shall not increase the base flood elevation. I will apply for a variance to the Zoning Board of Adjustments.
Engineer Date
1111 Page 6 of 9
o�
`H 0,0
12
li _ a phow ,V ODO z JPlwA ado�����&����
!�'�I �Doom
1 w�tl F S ���LLL eol )-=10
[TI!O
RMA G
/ o���
12
� 0b
USS I s ts€ €
1
� ==i
'
e'o I
w
GREENS -o
PRAIRIE=RAIL j. SoS P oil -
algia=-ov-wn� ° i l �s
"
S 4'4321
—— �- —� -,--,rte, j,� s� •, �c �. � � �
tj
e
fs
zf a ,>or O
o1NNI m z ,_rr
4 I IO SIS
1' LA3 oa'sy - -- - 4jg -.,rrr=33_ Y rr _
-BS:S£;g w 3.2z B1j I 4 R
Og
Jig
lint I i
' -�-III(`-�'� f •_ � i' ��/ \_'� � � ,°; `�
3j 1 1° N1 3 91 sRRE 'gCx V
Rib§b k€=,b w.
SOW
Hw� � K �j'-a' �
a M _ jog �c�=uu°`WtY H";
y ._
o o u 3 w Y 8 M1 dP 3 yktp a pmt N m R€5 a
: 11 AM _ €� Shal AN
� a " i"
Z.
s <
� g
ak 's k a og € x €W Wkz a low
� € 0� �. 'Mr!
� � � ai fax
�a a e <€ �� tea; ¢a �z�xE � ��
CITY of COLLEGE STATION
PRELIMINARY PLAN
for
Reatta Corner Subdivision
13-00900186
SCALE: Two commercial lots on 3.661 acres
LOCATION: 4001 Victoria Avenue, located at the south east corner of Barron
Road and Victoria Avenue.
ZONING: SC Suburban Commercial
APPLICANT: Natalie Ruiz, IPS Group
PROJECT MANAGER: Jenifer Paz, Staff Planner
jpaz@cstx.gov
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan with the
condition that the attached Staff Review Comment be addressed.
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 1 of 4
October 17, 2013
� z
W
OV
CO
r" 2
CU
z
t
4 p'.
• ~ .F {f7
'x
W
d...r z
ui
i
i.
ui
' l .k
e
y W
LU
lift, LU
,t41
W
W
oE
Ad
f C'
t5 S
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 2 of 4
October 17, 2013
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: June 1995
Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open, upon annexation
SC Suburban Commercial, May 2013
Site development: Vacant.
COMMENTS
Water: The property will be served by City of College Station. There is an
existing12-inch water main along Victoria Avenue that will serve
the property.
Sewer: The property will be served by City of College Station. Public
sanitary sewer will be required to be extended to serve both lots in
accordance with the B/CS Unified Design Guidelines with platting.
Off-site Easements: No off-site easements are being proposed.
Drainage: The property is located within the Spring Creek Drainage Basin.
Drainage required with site development shall be designed and
constructed in accordance with the B/CS Unified Design
Guidelines.
Flood Plain: There is no FEMA regulated floodplain located on the property.
Greenways: No greenway dedication is required or proposed.
Pedestrian Connectivity: Sidewalks exists along Victoria Avenue and Barron Road.
Bicycle Connectivity: Bike lanes exist along Victoria Avenue and Barron Road.
Streets: The Thoroughfare Plan designates Barron Road a 4-lane Minor
Arterial and Victoria Avenue a 2-lane Major Collector. A public
access easement is being dedicated on Victoria Avenue for a
future right turn lane and an acceleration lane on Barron Road. A
private access easement is proposed off Victoria Avenue that will
serve both lots.
Oversize Request: None requested.
Parkland Dedication Fees: No parkland dedication is required or proposed.
Impact Fees: Property is located within the Spring Creek Sanitary Sewer Impact
Fee area. Fees in the amount of$98.39/LUE will be due with the
Building Permit.
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 3 of 4
October 17, 2013
REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance: The
property is designated as Suburban Commercial on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land
Use and Character Map. The proposed Preliminary Plan is consistent with this designation.
2. Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The proposed Preliminary Plan is in
compliance with the Subdivisions Regulations contained in the Unified Development
Ordinance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan with the condition that the attached Staff
Review Comment be addressed.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Staff Review Comment
2. Application
3. Copy of Preliminary Plan
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 4 of 4
October 17, 2013
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
Project: REATTA CORNER SUBDIVISION (PP) - 13-00900186
PLANNING
1. Provide a minimum 10-foot Public Utility Easement (PUE) along Barron Road and Victoria
Avenue right-of-way. The PUE is to overlap the proposed public access easement and
widen to be 10 feet beyond said access easement.
Reviewed by: Jenifer Paz Date: October 9, 2013
Home of Texas A&M University
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO.: i, I KP
DATE SU IT ED: I
CITY OF CO 1.f;GE STATION TIME:
Hoine of'rcaas A6-M University' STAFF: /l
PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
I] $932 Preliminary Plan Application Fee.
$233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable).
Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used
and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
Fourteen (14)folded copies of plan. A revised mylar original must be submitted after approval.
I] Title report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate
current within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership, liens,
encumbrances, etc.
Impact study (if oversized participation is requested).
FX-1 The attached Preliminary Plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are
not.
Date of Optional Preapplication Conference
NAME OF PROJECT Reatta Corner Subdivision
ADDRESS unknown
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION:
southeast corner of Barron Road and Victoria Avenue
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name Natalie Ruiz E-mail natalie@ipsgroup.us
Street Address 511 University Drive East Suite 204
City College Station State Texas Zip Code 77840
Phone Number 979-846-9259 Fax Number 979-260-3564
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (ALL owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple
owners):
Name Gary Seaback Estate c% Theresa Holland E-mail theresaholland14@gmail.com
Street Address 1711 Fawn Court
City San Antonio State Texas Zip Code 78248
Phone Number 210-771-5822 Fax Number 866-924-4399
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name James Batenhorst E-mail lames@mitchel/andmorgan.cot^
Street Address 511 University Drive East Suite 204
City College Station State Texas Zip Code 77840
Phone Number 979-260-6963 Fax Number 979-260-3564
1/11 Pagel of
Total Acreage 3.661 acres Total No. of Lots 2 R-O-W Acreage 0
Number of Lots By Zoning District 2 / SC 1 /
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
Floodplain Acreage 0
NOTE: Appropriate zoning for the proposed subdivision must be in place before this application can be
considered complete.
Are you proposing to dedicate park land by acreage or fee in lieu of land? N/A
Are you proposing to F- develop the park f— dedicate the development fee? (Check one)
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
F- Yes
FX No
If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name:
City Project Number(in known).
Date/Timeframe when submitted:
Requested wavier to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable)
one
1/11 Page 2 of 6
Regarding the waiver request, explain how:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the
subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.
2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other
property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance.
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable):
1. F An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way;
2. F The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the
purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan;
3. F A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12) months;
4. r Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate/
rural context;
5. r When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Master Plan;
1/11 Page 3 of 6
6. F The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and
Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO; or
7. F The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway I Expressway as designated by Map 6.6,
Thoroughfare Plan- Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Detailed explanation of condition identified above:
NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the
same time by the Planning &Zoning Commission.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached
hereto are true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE
OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from
the owner. If there is more than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If
the owner is a company, the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's
representative to sign the application on its behalf. LIEN HOLDERS identified in the title report are also
considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as described above.
V3Qk3
Signature and title Date
1/11 Page 4 of 6
d x` a
v
so—
mU ¢� o
F Z yz
\` H
QSp
Zt
w
o m
jI 65Ymm
✓:� � �ao � � ��8x
Sil
Q -
' l
AN _
41
AN
�£3x
tv
AN
15
t
� 3n
(i
*ArA�
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
FINAL PLAT
for
Reatta Corner Subdivision
13-00900187
SCALE: Two commercial lots on 3.661 acres
LOCATION: 4001 Victoria Avenue, located at the southeast corner of Barron
Road and Victoria Avenue.
ZONING: SC Suburban Commercial
APPLICANT: Natalie Ruiz, IPS Group
PROJECT MANAGER: Jenifer Paz, Staff Planner
jpaz@cstx.gov
RECOMMENDATION: If the Preliminary Plan is approved, Staff recommends approval of
the Final Plat with the condition that the attached Staff Review
Comments be addressed.
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 1 of 3
October 17, 2013
0-
ti
bw
A¢
\ , rf W LL O
CD
LU
n
LU
L J s
III
W
LUe
ui
ti.
c
!
,.
ui
. Lij
�
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 2 of 3
October 17, 2013
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: June 1995
Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open (upon annexation) to SC Suburban
Commercial (May 2013)
Preliminary Plan: Reatta Corner Subdivision preliminary plan will be presented to
the Commission on the same agenda; the Final Plat is contingent
on the approval of the Preliminary Plan.
Site Development: Vacant.
COMMENTS
Parkland Dedication: No parkland dedication is required or proposed.
Greenways: No greenway dedication is required or proposed.
Pedestrian Connectivity: Six-foot sidewalks exist along Victoria Avenue and Barron Road.
Bicycle Connectivity: Bike lanes exist along Victoria Avenue and Barron Road.
Impact Fees: Property is located within the Spring Creek Sanitary Sewer Impact
Fee area. Fees in the amount of$98.39/LUE will be due with the
Building Permit.
REVIEW CRITERIA
Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The proposed Final Plat is in compliance with
the Subdivision Regulations contained in the Unified Development Ordinance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
If the Preliminary Plan is approved, Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat with the
condition that the attached Staff Review Comments be addressed.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Staff review comments
2. Application
3. Copy of Final Plat
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 3 of 3
October 17, 2013
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
Project: REATTA CORNER SUBDIVISION (FP) - 13-00900187
PLANNING
1. The Public Utility Easement must be adjacent to the right-of-way to allow the necessary
public utilities to be provided. The PUE must include Public Access Easements along
Barron & Victoria, but provide 10' beyond said access easement.
Reviewed by: Jenifer Paz Date: October 9, 2013
Home of Texas A&M University
1 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO.: I
DATE SUBMITTED::
Q-1, 36
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION TIME: - i
Home of Texas AdMUniueniry' STAFF:
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
(Check one) ❑ Minor ❑ Amending ❑X Final ❑ Vacating ❑Replat
($700) ($700) ($932) ($932) ($932)
Is this plat in the ETJ? ❑ Yes ❑X No Is this plat Commercial ❑X or Residential
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
xi $700-$932 Final Plat Application Fee (see above).
��1 $233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable).
❑X $600 (minimum) Development Permit Application / Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is
1% of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is > $600, the balance is
due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit).
Q Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and
may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
U Fourteen (14)folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.)
Two (2) copies of the grading, drainage, and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report.
k Two (2) copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable).
IfCopy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable).
Title report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate
current within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership, liens,
encumbrances, etc.
Ix1 Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D.
0 The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
NOTE: A mylar of the approved preliminary plan must be on file before a final plat application will be considered
complete. If the mylar is submitted with the final plat application, it shall be considered a submittal for the
preliminary plan project and processed and reviewed as such. Until the mylar has been confirmed by staff
to be correct, the final plat application will be considered incomplete.
Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference N/A
NAME OF PROJECT Reatta Corner Subdivision
ADDRESS unknown
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT:
southeast corner of Barron Road and Victoria Avenue
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name Natalie Ruiz E-mail natalie@ipsgroup.us
Street Address 511 University Drive East Suite 204
City College Station State Texas Zip Code 77840
Phone Number 979-846-9259 Fax Number 979-260-3564
1111 Page 1 of 9
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (All owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple
owners):
Name Gary Seaback Estate c% Theresa Holland E-mail theresaholland14@gmail.com
Street Address 1711 Fawn Court
City San Antonio State Texas Zip Code 78248
Phone Number 210-771-5822 Fax Number 866-924-4399
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name James Batenhorst E-mail James@mitchellandmorgan.com
Street Address 511 University Drive East Suite 204
City College Station State Texas Zip Code 77840
Phone Number 979-260-6963 Fax Number 979-260-3564
Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property? ❑ Yes ❑X No
Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so, please provide the Volume and Page No.
Total Acreage 3.661 acres Total No. of Lots 2 R-O-W Acreage 0
Existing Use vacant Proposed Use commercial
Number of Lots By Zoning District 2 / SC f f
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
Floodplain Acreage 0
Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels)on the property? F Yes rX No
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
F Yes
jX No
If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name:
City Project Number(if known).
Date/Timeframe when submitted:
1/11 Page 2 of 9
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan (if applicable):
�o►tie
Requested waiver to subdivision regulations and reason for same if applicable).
one -
Regarding the waiver request, explain how:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the
subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.`
2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other
property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance.
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable):
1. I— An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way;
2. F The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the
purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan;
3. F A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12) months;
4. F_ Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate/
rural context;
5. I_ When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Master Plan;
1/11 Page 3 of 9
6. F The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and
Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO; or
7. r The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway/Expressway as designated by Map 6.6,
Thoroughfare Plan - Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Detailed explanation of condition identified above:
NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the
same time by the Planning &Zoning Commission.
Requested Oversize Participationnone
Total Linear Footage of Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
Proposed Public:
ACREAGE:
Streets N/A
No. of acres to be dedicated +$ development fee
�
Sidewalks
_
No. of acres in floodplain
,a"If Sanitary Sewer Lines
0 Water Lines No. of acres in detention
0 Channels No. of acres in greenways
0 Storm Sewers OR
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
� Bike Lanes/Paths N/A
No. of SF Dwelling Units X$ _ $
(date)Approved by Parks & Recreation Advisory Board
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are
true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more
than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. LIEN
HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as
described above.
Signature and title Date
1/11 Page 4 of 9
CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT
Owner Certification:
1. No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued.
2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein.
3. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re-issued.
4. Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued.
5. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance.
6. Other permits may be required to fulfill local, state, and federal requirements. Owner will obtain or show
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOI and SWPPP.
7. If required, Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-
pour) and post construction.
8. Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify
compliance.
9. If, stormwater mitigation is required, including detention ponds proposed as part of this project, it shall be
designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
10. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken
to insure that all debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or
existing drainage facilities. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to
and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the
City of College Station shall apply.
11. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines Technical Specifications, and Standard Details. All development has been designed in
accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal
Regulations.
12. Release of plans to (name or firm) is authorized for bidding purposes
only. I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on
contractor signature on approved Development Permit.
13. I, THE OWNER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR
THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION, ARE,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE,AND
ACCURATE.
V13
4operty Owner(s) Date �/.tom o%
Engineer Certification: CO I
1. The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds, proposed as part
of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence.
2. I will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local, State and Federal Permits prior to construction
including NOI and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES: i.e., projects over 10 acres may
require a sedimentation basin.
3. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances
of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations.
4. THE ENGINEER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS
F'R THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND
CURATE.
Engineer Date
1/11 Page 5 of 9
The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas.
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, Fill / Grading Permits, and Clearing Only
Permits:*
A. i, certify, as demonstrated in the attached drainage study, that the
alterations or development covered by this permit, shall not: W°
(i) increase the Base Flood elevation; =AJ
(ii) create additional areas of Special Flood Hazard Area;
(iii) decrease the conveyance capacity to that part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway
and where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood event is greater than one foot per second. This area can
also be approximated to be either areas within 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or
areas where the depth of from the BFE to natural ground is 18 inches or greater;
(iv) reduce the Base Flood water storage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond
the floodway and conveyance area where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than
one foot per second without acceptable compensation as set forth in the City of College Station Code of
Ordinances, Chapter 13 concerning encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area; nor
(v) increase Base Flood velocities.
beyond those areas exempted by ordinance in Section 5.11.3a of Chapter 13 Code of Ordinances.
Engineer Date
Initial
f * If a platting-status exemption to this requirement is asserted, provide written justification under separate
letter in lieu of certification.
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, and Fill /Grading Permits:
B. I, tAL& _ , certify to the following; 11)0 ~
(i) that any nonresiden ial or multi-family structure on or proposed to be okaln i site as part oft is appllt Tion is
designed to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100-year storm.
Engineer Date
Additional certificativi f r Floodway Encroachments:
C. I, , certify that the construction, improvement, or fill covered by this
permit shall not increase t6 base flood elevation. I will apply for a variance to the Zoning Board of Adjustments.
Engineer Date
1/11 Page 6 of 9
Required for all projects proposing structures in Special Flood Hazard Area (Elevation Certificate
required).
Residential Structures:
D. I, , certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any residential stricture shall have the lowest floor, including all utilities, ductwork and any basement, at an
elevation at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation. Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with
elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-pour)and post construction.
Engineer/ Surveyor Date
Commercial Structures:
E. I. certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement
of any commercial, industrial, or other non-residential structure are designed to have the lowest floor, including all
utilities, ductwork and basements, elevated at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation
Engineer/ Surveyor Date
OR
1, certify that the structure with its attendant utility, ductwork,
basement and sanita facilities is designed to be flood-proofed so that the structure and utilities, ductwork,
basement and sanitary facilities are designed to be watertight and impermeable to the intrusion of water in all
areas below the Base Flood Elevation, and shall resist the structural loads and buoyancy effects from the
hydrostatic and hydrodynamic conditions.
Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-
pour)and post construction.
Engineer/ Surveyor Date
Conditions or comments as part of approval.
1/11 Page 7 of 9
_ Q s W `t
W cc
M Qu)C:
Hai
2x
-
����
sg` a Eli
39
56 ga
4b IE�s� oS of _ 2$
lip
a
v
�4
as
�0011l]
40
(*Arq5*
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
FINAL PLAT
for
Castlegate II Sec 103
13-00900181
SCALE: 39 lots on approximately 9.6 acres
LOCATION: 2517 Kimbolton Dr
ZONING: GS General Suburban
APPLICANT: Wallace Phillips IV, 3-D Development LLC
PROJECT MANAGER: Matt Robinson, AICP, Senior Planner
mrobinson@cstx.gov
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat.
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 1 of 3
October 17, 2013
3 .4 � -3 ✓ y �� 06
g
y�
y i 4i'
JT
4
Ai yy
:� � .�"?,y� �� � '{ �� 3� fib �` r �:4`•
{ � a
s'y
14.
r .
tN
„ft
^� ;
{
�sYJ W RF
V a�`.vv'�" 3�` �`'� " +`i r k�•4s 'fin gs*q"'r 'sF'r.4°s. hd• a
_ x_ �h.� x %� ��:a' �,: .T+."aB R°{�•I,�E�' �:�r P°3' Y� �' p t C Ys�'�
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: 1995
Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open (upon annexation) to A-O Agricultural Open
and R-1 Single-Family Residential (2007); R-1 Single-Family
Residential renamed to GS General Suburban (Sept. 2013)
Preliminary Plat: Castlegate II preliminary plat was approved in January 2011 and
subsequently revised in March 2012.
Site Development: Infrastructure is currently under construction for Sections 101 and
203, with Sections 100 and 200-202 currently platted with homes
under construction.
COMMENTS
Parkland Dedication: Land dedication was provided with the first Final Plat of the
Castlegate II subdivision and the developer is currently
constructing neighborhood park improvements. Community
Parkland dedication fees of$16,250 (26 lots X $625) are due prior
to filing of the Final Plat.
Greenways: N/A
Pedestrian Connectivity: Sidewalks are required and will be provided on both sides of all
thoroughfares and on one side of all local streets. In addition,
sidewalks are proposed to be provided in designated common
areas throughout the development.
Bicycle Connectivity: Bike lanes will be provided along W.S. Phillips Parkway.
Impact Fees: The subject tract is located in the Spring Creek Sanitary Sewer
Impact Fee Area and will be assessed $98.39 per Living Unit
Equivalent (LUE).
REVIEW CRITERIA
Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The proposed Final Plat is in compliance with the
Subdivision Requirements contained in the Unified Development Ordinance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Application
2. Copy of Final Plat
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 3 of 3
October 17, 2013
FOR OFFI(;EASE
CASE NO.: !,9 I ++
DATE SUBMITTED: r
CITY OF COI.I.I,GI?STATION TIME:
Home of Texas A&M University' STAFF:
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
(Check one) ❑ Minor ❑ Amending ❑ Final ❑ Vacating ❑Replat
($700) ($700) ($932) ($932) ($932)
Is this plat in the ETJ? ❑ Yes ❑ No Is this plat Commercial ❑ or Residential ❑X
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
$700-$932 Final Plat Application Fee (see above).
liN $233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee(if applicable).
$600 (minimum) Development Permit Application / Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is
1.% of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is > $600, the balance is
.due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit).
Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and
,may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
VVourteen (14)folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.)
7Two(2)copies of the grading, drainage, and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report.
Two (2)copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable).
fNJ& Qopy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable).
'Title report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate
current within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership, liens,
,encumbrances, etc.
f,Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D.
The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
NOTE: A mylar of the approved preliminary plan must be on file before a final plat application will be considered
complete. If the mylar is submitted with the final plat application, it shall be considered a submittal for the
preliminary plan project and processed and reviewed as such. Until the mylar has been confirmed by staff
to be correct, the final plat application will be considered incomplete.
Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference N/A
NAME OF PROJECT Castlegate 11 Subdivision- Section 103
ADDRESS Intersection of Norwich Drive and Victoria Avenue
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT:
Southwest of Castlegate 11 Subdivision, Section 100
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name Wallace Phillips IV E-mail dustyphillips52@yahoo.com
Street Address 4490 Castlegate Drive
City College Station State TX _ - Zip Code 77845
Phone Number 979.690.7250 Fax Number 979.690.1041
1/11 Page 1 of 9
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMAL d (All owners must be identified. Please ach an additional sheet for multiple
owners):
Name 3-D Development, LLC E-mail dustyphillips52@yahoo.com
Street Address 4490 Castlegate Drive
City College Station State TX _ Zip Code 77845
Phone Number 979.690.7250 Fax Number 979.690.1041
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name Schultz Engineering, LLC-Joe Schultz E-mail loeschultz84@verizon.net
Street Address 2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A
City College Station State TX Zip Code 77845
Phone Number 979.764.3900 Fax Number 979.764.3910
Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property? ❑x Yes ❑ No
Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so, please provide the Volume 10392 and Page No. 276
Total Acreage 9.605 Total No. of Lots 39 R-O-W Acreage 3.50
Existing Use Agricultural- Vacant Proposed Use Single Family Residential
Number of Lots By Zoning District 39 / R1 1 1
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
0.157 / RI
Floodplain Acreage n/a
Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? [7Yes F> No
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
F3 Yes
rI No
If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name: Castlegate II Preliminary Plat
City Project Number(if known): 12-00500004
Date/Timeframe when submitted: January 2012
1/11 Page 2 of 9
6. [ The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and
Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO; or
7. F The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway I Expressway as designated by Map 6.6,
Thoroughfare Plan - Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Detailed explanation of condition identified above:
NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the
same time by the Planning &Zoning Commission.
Requested Oversize Participation
Total Linear Footage of parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
Proposed Public:
2585 Streets ACREAGE:
4000Sidewalks No. of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee
1323Sanitary Sewer Lines No. of acres in floodplain
2029Water Lines No. of acres in detention.-
- Channels
No. of acres in greenways
2630OR
Storm Sewers
- Bike Lanes/ Paths FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
No. of SF Dwelling Units X$ _ $
(date)Approved by Parks& Recreation Advisory Board
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are
true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more
than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. LIEN
HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as
described above.
Signature and title Date
1/11 Page 4 of 9
A"
C/)
d-K 3
pc�C>
'A-, -j gp
PLI Z
wt ix 1 7 N 7
te S.. 8� So 8o
0, 6 bE t
S - -! tl
.Tx, W9 Ev - - - mW E r
An r ^ems
ma
— R , -. . �13 . .
g. M, g g; 0., ug
XF2 In 'd
.--8� -N
la N
N
Wi p
i
-.3 -
Us 2moo -!It 41
Z
sP ac s
'Ido %Ig 1 h N .-a H N 5D :59 Vi-a gl--.8
A
.6g
gj
IN Uh
W
-T
P
43—
it.
iq '11n
z
H SAM,
———————————— Z.-.0.Li —————---
anUOAV UP0431A
.......as....... .
_ N'ag'Ye. � .mom ,m.v mw sv�w� mx � 8a aaa saacae
N !Z8
i.
-aro 89
nj
a wjjoqmT
AU
.. ..
?
,4m
I s--j2 7 1 1
fl -1 5111 Jill fl �Rj fl �tl
lu
et
(*APrq4
CITE' OF COLLEGE STATION
FINAL PLAT
for
Breezy Heights Lots 9-12, Blk 1
Being a Replat of
1.2607 acres in Block 1 of Breezy Heights Addition
13-00900159
SCALE: Four lots on 1.26 acres
LOCATION: 900 Hereford St
ZONING: GS General Suburban
APPLICANT: Adam Wallace, ATM Surveying
PROJECT MANAGER: Teresa Rogers, Staff Planner
trogers@cstx.gov
PROJECT OVERVIEW: A Final Plat was approved by the Planning & Zoning Commission in
May 2013, which created four single-family residential lots in
compliance with the Unified Development Ordinance Subdivision
Regulations Section 8.3.H.2 Platting and Replatting within Older
Residential Subdivisions; however this plat has not been filed. At the
request of adjacent property owners, the applicant has since
reconfigured the lots in order to create three smaller lots on Welsh
Avenue and one larger lot on Hereford Street in order to preserve the
existing house located there. The proposed Final Plat is a replat of
one GS General Suburban building plot into four GS General
Suburban lots in an area designated Neighborhood Conservation in
the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed configuration includes
smaller lot sizes on Welsh Avenue, similar to the existing lots along
the block face and preserves the large lot size on Hereford Street.
This configuration of the lots requires waivers to be granted.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat and the associated
waiver request to reduced average lot width along Welsh Avenue.
Staff believes the Final Plat conserves the neighborhood character
along the block faces of Welsh Avenue and Hereford Street with the
proposed lot configuration. The applicant has stated he is revising
his request based on the desire of surrounding neighbors in this area
to maintain the large lot located on Hereford Street. If the waiver is
approved, Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat. If the waiver
request is denied, the Final Plat must also be denied.
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 1 of 4
October 17, 2013
LU
IOW.`
Te F
LO
x
in
r�
r^�► '] W
Ackf
tot
COP
ILLI
x `
�.
'pr p
Th ui
� c
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 2 of 4
October 17, 2013
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: October 1938
Zoning: GS General Suburban (previously named R-1 Single-Family
Residential)
Preliminary Plat: The subject tract is considered a building plot according to Section
8.3.H.2 Platting and Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions
of the Unified Development Ordinance. The original Final Plat for this
area is from 1946.
Site Development: A single-family structure currently exists on the building plot.
COMMENTS
Parkland Dedication: Fees in lieu of parkland dedication will be assessed on three newly
established single-family lots for a total of$3,783 (3x$1,261) and will
be due before the Final Plat is filed.
Greenways: No dedication is proposed or required with this plat.
Pedestrian Connectivity: There is an existing sidewalk along Welsh Avenue. No dedication is
proposed or required with this plat.
Bicycle Connectivity: There is an existing bike route along Welsh Avenue. No dedication is
proposed or required with this plat.
Impact Fees: N/A
REVIEW CRITERIA
Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: As proposed, the plat requires the following waiver
to the subdivision regulations contained in the Unified Development Ordinance:
Section 8.3.H.2 — Platting and Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions requires replatted
lots meet or exceed the average width of the lots along the street frontage for all lots in the block.
The average lot width of the block is 78 feet and 64 feet lot widths are proposed along Welsh
Avenue.
In accordance with the Subdivision Regulations, when considering a waiver, the Planning
and Zoning Commission should make the following findings to approve the waiver:
1. That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such
that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of
the reasonable use of his land;
A plat was previously approved for this property which subdivided the existing plot into four
equal lots, with two located on Welsh Avenue and two located on Hereford Street. In order
to file this plat the applicant would have to remove the existing older home on Hereford
Street to be in compliance with subdivision regulations, which requires existing structures be
located outside the setback of the new property line. At the request of the adjacent property
owners, the applicant has agreed to a compromise which would preserve the large lot on
Hereford Street and allow the existing older house to remain. It should be noted that while
proposed lot 9 on Hereford Street allows the existing house to remain, the proposed lot area
is large enough to be subdivided into two lots in the future, without needing a waiver.
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 3 of 4
October 17, 2013
2. That the waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial
property right of the applicant;
The applicant has stated the resubdivision and development of four lots is necessary for the
project to be financially feasible. In order to preserve the existing large lot on Hereford
Street the applicant needs to create three lots on the Welsh Avenue side of the property for
the project to be viable.
3. That the granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering this
chapter; and
The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or
injurious to other property in the area, as the proposed lots are similar to the existing lots on
each block face, with average widths of 64 feet on Welsh Avenue and 127 feet on Hereford
Street.
4. That the granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly
subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of the Unified
Development Ordinance.
The granting of the requested waiver will not prevent future development as all
abutting properties have been developed.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat and the associated waiver request to reduced average
lot width along Welsh Avenue. Staff believes the Final Plat conserves the neighborhood character
along the block faces of Welsh Avenue and Hereford Street with the proposed lot configuration.
The applicant has stated he is revising his request based on the desire of surrounding neighbors in
this area to maintain the large lot located on Hereford Street. If the waiver is approved, Staff
recommends approval of the Final Plat. If the waiver request is denied, the Final Plat must also be
denied.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Application
2. Copy of Final Plat
3. Support Letters from Neighbors
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 4 of 4
October 17, 2013