HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/07/2013 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning Commission (-lq
r 44r�
ITY OF Co ]J,]-.GJ� STNTION
Home of Texas A&M Unzversi�y
Planning & Zoning
Commission
November 7, 2013
City Hall Council Chambers
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas
Workshop Meeting 6:30 PM
Regular Meeting 7:00 PM
(*Orq"
AGENDA
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Home ofTexasA&M University` PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
WORKSHOP MEETING
NOVEMBER 7, 2013,AT 6:30 P.M.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1101 TEXAS AVENUE
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
1. Call the meeting to order.
2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items.
3. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. [_New Development
List]
4. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the status of items within the 2013
P&Z Plan of Work(see attached). (J.Schubert)
5. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming
Meetings.
• Thursday, November 14, 2013 — City Council Meeting — Council Chambers —
Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. (Liaison—Ashfield)
• Tuesday, November 19, 2013 — Joint P&Z Meeting with City of Bryan — College
Station Utilities Training Facility— 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
• Thursday, November 21, 2013 P&Z Meeting — Council Chambers — Workshop
6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m.
• Monday, November 25, 2013 City Council Meeting Council Chambers —
Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. (Liaison—Miles)
6. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review
Board, Joint Parks / Planning & Zoning Subcommittee, BioCorridor Board, and Zoning
District Subcommittee.
7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning & Zoning Member
may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific
factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation
shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
8. Adjourn.
AGENDA
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Howe of Texas A&M University"
REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 7,20139 AT 7:00 P.M.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1101 TEXAS AVENUE
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
1. Call meeting to order.
2. Pledge of Allegiance.
3. Hear Citizens. At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to
address the Commission on planning and zoning issues not already scheduled on tonight's
agenda. The citizen presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to
accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate
time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information,
ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for
discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for
the record.)
All matters listed under Item 4, Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Planning &
Zoning Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans
and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All
items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. There will not
be separate discussion of these items. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the
Consent Agenda it will be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration.
4. Consent Agenda
4.1 Consideration, possible action, and discussion to approve Meeting Minutes.
• October 17, 2013 —Workshop
• October 17, 2013 —Regular
4.2 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Castlegate II Section
204 consisting of 41 single-family residential lots on approximately 18.8 acres
generally located west of the Castlegate Subdivision along W.S. Phillips Parkway.
Case#13-00900198 (M. Robinson)
4.3 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Preliminary Plan for Summit
Crossing Phase 2A consisting of 46 townhome lots on approximately 5.6 acres
generally located east of Crescent Pointe and north of the existing Summit Crossing
development along Harvey Road . Case#13-00900200 (M. Robinson)
Regular Agenda
5. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent
Agenda by Commission action.
6. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Caprock
Crossing Lots 1R and 2R, Block 2 being a replat of Caprock Crossing Lot 1, Block 2,
consisting of two lots on approximately 8.2 acres located at 4446 State Highway 6 South.
Case#13-00900121 (M. Robinson)
7. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an amendment to
Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by rezoning approximately
4.4 acres being Glenhaven Estates Phase 6, Block 16 located at 1600 University Drive
East, generally located at the corner of University Drive East and Glenhaven Drive, from
O Office to GC General Commercial. Case #13-00900197 (M. Hester) (Note: Final
action on this item is scheduled for the November 25, 2013 City Council Meeting -
subject to change)
8. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning & Zoning Member
may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific
factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation
shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
9. Adjourn.
2013 Planning & Zoning Commission Plan of Work
Comprehensive Plan Implementation
Implementation of Adopted Plans
Summary: Project Dates:
Implementation of adopted master plans and 2/14/13: Council discussion regarding board
neighborhood, district, and corridor plans, namely: compositions for Medical District MMD#1 .
Central College Station, Eastgate, and Southside Area 6/20/2013: Discussion regarding CIP development
neighborhood plans, and Bicycle, Pedestrian, and process at P&Z Regular meeting.
Greenways, Parks and Recreation, Water, Waste 7/18/13: Recommendation for FY14 CIP proposal at
Water, and Medical District master plans. P&Z Regular meeting.
10/17/13: Comprehensive Plan Annual Review at
P&Z.
10/24/13: Comprehensive Plan Annual Review at
Council.
Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff lAnticipated Completion: On-going
Wellborn Community Plan
Summary: Project Dates:
Development of a district plan for the recently annexed 4/1/13: Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory
Wellborn area that contains elements of a rural historic Board recommended approval of the Plan.
community with a unique character that residents of the 4/4/13: P&Z recommended approval of proposed plan.
area desire to retain. 4/25/13: Council adopted plan.
Staff Assigned: M. Robinson Completed: April 2013
Economic Development Master Plan
Summary: Project Dates:
Development of a Master Plan to provide consistent 2/7/13: Master Plan update at P&Z Workshop.
direction on how the City will help ensure its economic 7/18/13: P&Z Workshop on draft Master Plan.
health for years to come while providing a positive 9/5/13: P&Z recommended approval of plan.
business development environment. 1 9/12/13 Council adopted plan.
Staff Assigned: R. Heye Completed: September 2013
South Knoll Area Neighborhood Plan
Summary: Project Dates:
8/5/13: Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory
Development of a neighborhood plan for a number of Board recommendation on proposed plan.
unique neighborhood areas. The plan area is generally
bounded by Holleman Drive, Welsh Avenue, Wellborn 8/15/13: P&Z recommended approval of plan with
Road, Harvey Mitchell Parkway, and Texas Avenue. some conditions.
9/26/13: Council adopted an amended plan.
Staff Assigned: J. Prochazka, M. Hester Completed: September 2013
Page 1 of 4
Neighborhood Parking
Summary: Project Dates:
Analyze neighborhood parking issues by engaging 2/21/13: Task Force Final Report presented to P&Z.
stakeholders and working in a Joint Task Force 2/28/13: Task Force Final Report presented to
Subcommittee with Council. Implement recommended Council.
solutions. 7/9/13-8/5/13: Stakeholder comment period.
9/5/13: P&Z recommended approval of ordinance.
9/12/13: Council adopted proposed ordinance.
Staff Assigned: B. Cowell, T. Rogers Completed: September 2013
Residential Zoning Districts
Summary: Project Dates:
Create and adopt new residential zoning districts to 4/9/13: Public meeting regarding single family and
implement the future land use and character duplex zoning concepts.
designations identified in the Comprehensive Plan. 4/19/13: P&Z Subcommittee meeting.
5/31/13: P&Z Subcommittee meeting.
6/7/13-7/7/13: Stakeholder comment period for draft
zoning ordinance changes.
9/5/13: P&Z recommended approval of ordinance.
9/12/13: Council adopted proposed ordinance.
Staff Assigned: J. Prochazka, T. Rogers Completed: September 2013
Medical District Zoning Districts
Summary: Project Dates:
Create and adopt Medical and Urban Village zoning 5/2/13: Presentation regarding Plan implementation at
districts to implement the new future land use and P&Z Workshop.
character designations established by the Medical 8/15/13: Presentation of district concepts at P&Z
District Master Plan. I Workshop.
Staff Assigned: J. Prochazka, M. Robinson JAnticipated Completion:
Research and Education
Plan Implementation
Summary: Project Dates:
The linkage between the Comprehensive Plan, Master
Plans, and Neighborhood, District, and Corridor Plans.
The linkage between regulations, funding, etc and plan
implementation.
• Overview of concept—provide a review of how this 5/2/13: Discussion at P&Z Regular meeting.
system is built in College Station and intended to be
used (link between vision, comprehensive plan,
strategic plan, etc).
Page 2 of 4
Link between Comprehensive Plan and Master Plans 5/2/13: Discussion at P&Z Regular meeting.
—this would include an overview of each of the adopted
Master Plans and a demonstration of how for example
we plan wastewater to serve the proposed land use and
how for example the BPG Master Plan, if implemented
responds to the desired character of the City, etc.
Link between adopted plans and regulations/ 6/6/13: Discussion at P&Z Workshop.
standards —this would include examples of how we use
regs (for example new zoning districts or block length)
to further the objectives/goals contained in the policy
documents/plans and to help highlight how the success
of those plans is impacted by the regs selected (or not)
—for example how a certain type of block length yields
a certain development pattern and connectivity whereas
a different block length will yield a different pattern.
Link between plans and funding—this would include 6/20/13: Discussion at P&Z Regular meeting.
how the plans have been fiscally constrained and how
funding plays a role in their successful implementation
and how if not adequately funded they will fall short of
expectations.
Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff JAnticipated Completion:
Character and Community Design
Summary: Project Dates:
The purpose and definition of community character,
community design, and the role they play in community
vitality and success.
Overview of community character (versus just a focus 5/16/13: Discussion at P&Z Workshop.
on land use/protection from incompatible uses)—this
would include an overview of what our plans say about
this and again what best practices are in these areas.
Link between community design and livability—this TBD: Discussion at P&Z Retreat.
would be an overview of what the principles of good
community design are, where these principles have (or
have not) been used in College Station and where
livability has been improved (or negatively impacted)as
a result.
Link between community design and economic vitality TBD: Discussion at P&Z Retreat.
—this would be an overview of how community design
impacts land values (and thus tax revenues)creates
new economic opportunities, etc.
Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff JAnticipated Completion:
Page 3 of 4
Affordable Housing and Community Development
Summary: Project Dates:
Receive updates regarding affordable housing and
other community development efforts.
Overview of the City's current approach to addressing 7/18/13: Discussion at P&Z Workshop.
affordable housing needs.
Overview of the Department's revised approach to 7/18/13: Discussion at P&Z Workshop.
community development—this would be an overview of
a Community Development Master Plan.
On-going updates as needed (annual action plan, 8/8/13: Council adopted Annual Action Plan.
Community Development Master Plan, etc).
Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff JAnticipated Completion: On-going
Single-Family and Multi-Family Housing Markets
Summary: Project Dates:
Discuss impact of large amount of new multi-family
units and single-family dwellings being used for student
rental purposes on the local housing market.
Overview of the issue/questions —this would be an 5/16/13: Discussion of methodology and scope at P&Z
overview of what the perceived issues/questions are Regular meeting.
and what others might have looked at in other
communities when asking similar questions to devise a
methodology.
Overview of the new multi-family market—this would
be what is being built, by whom, how are they
performing, who is moving into them, etc. may include
surveys, focus groups, guest speakers, etc.
Overview of existing multi-family market—this would
be what exists, who owns it, what are they doing to
maintain and rent it, how are they performing, who is
moving into them, etc. may include surveys, focus
groups, guest speakers, etc.
Overview of the single-family rental market—what is
being built, who is managing what and how, who is
renting, what are the implications/benefits of this
market, etc. may include surveys, focus groups, guest
speakers, etc.
What, if any, response are needed/appropriate by the
City to address issues.
Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff Anticipated Completion:
Page 4 of 4
MINUTES
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Home of Tmo AdM Univrniiy' Workshop Meeting
October 17, 2013, 6:00 p.m.
City Hall Council Chambers
College Station, Texas
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Mike Ashfield, Jodi Warner, Brad Corrier, and Jerome
Rektorik
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Jim Ross and Bo Miles
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: None
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Bob Cowell, Lance Simms, Jennifer Prochazka, Jason Schubert,
Matt Robinson, Morgan Hester, Jenifer Paz, Alan Gibbs, Danielle Singh, Erika Bridges, Robin
Cross, Timothy Green, and Brittany Caldwell
1. Call the meeting to order.
Chairman Ashfield called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items.
There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding Consent Agenda Items
4.4 and 4.5
Chairman Ashfield stated that Commissioner Miles was absent from the meeting and an
absence request needed to be added to Consent Agenda Item 4.2
3. Discussion of Minor and Amending Plats approved by Staff.
• Final Plat — Amending — Sutton Place Lots 1R, 2R, & 3 — 3 Lots — 2300 Earl Rudder
Freeway Case# 13-00900118 (T.Rogers)
• Final Plat — Minor — Spring Creek Townhomes Ph. 2 Block 2 Lots 17R-18R — 2 Lots
4309 Dawn Lynn Drive Case# 13-00900177 (J.Paz)
• Final Plat — Minor — The Business Center at College Station — 2 Lots — 210
Technology Way Case# 13-00900179 (M.Hester)
There was no discussion regarding Plats approved by Staff.
4. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. [New Development
List]
There was no discussion regarding development applications submitted to the City.
October 17,2013 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 3
5. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the status of items within the 2013
P&Z Plan of Work(see attached). (J.Schubert)
Principal Planner Schubert gave an update regarding the P&Z Plan of Work.
6. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an update on the following items:
• An ordinance amending the Unified Development Ordinance to address single-family
parking requirements. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August
15th and voted 5-0 to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on
September 12th and voted 5-1 to approve the ordinance.
• An ordinance amending the Unified Development Ordinance, changing the street
network and block length requirements. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard
this item on September 5th and voted 5-1 to recommend denial. The City Council heard
this item on September 12th and voted 4-2 to approve the ordinance.
• An ordinance amending the Unified Development Ordinance, changing the one- and
two-family residential zoning districts in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan.
The Planning& Zoning Commission heard this item on September 5th and voted 6-0 to
recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on September 12th and voted
5-1 to approve the ordinance.
• An ordinance amending the College Station Comprehensive Plan by adopting the
Economic Development Master Plan. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this
item on September 5th and voted 6-0 to recommend approval. The City Council heard
this item on September 12th and voted 5-1 to approve the ordinance.
• A rezoning from NG-3 (Residential Northgate) to NG-2 (Transitional Northgate) for
St. Mary's Church in Northgate. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item
on September 5th and voted 6-0 to recommend approval. The City Council heard this
item on September 26th and voted 7-0 to approve the rezoning.
• Adoption of the South Knoll Area Neighborhood Plan. The Planning and Zoning
Commission heard this item on August 15th and voted 5-0 to recommend approval of
the plan with a change to the on-street parking removal option. The City Council heard
this item on September 26th and voted 7-0 to adopt the plan after removing a proposal
to reduce the number of unrelated individuals (from four to two), modifying the
process to request removal of on-street parking, removing the requirement for
additional rental registration information, and removing the prohibition of on-street
parking from 2:00 am until 6:00 am.
There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding items approved by
City Council.
7. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming
Meetings.
October 17,2013 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3
• Thursday, October 24, 2013 — City Council Meeting — Council Chambers —Workshop
6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. (Liaison— Corrier)
• Thursday, November 7, 2013 — P&Z Meeting — Council Chambers — Workshop 6:00
p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m.
There was no discussion regarding upcoming meetings.
8. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review
Board, Joint Parks / Planning & Zoning Subcommittee, BioCorridor Board, and Zoning
District Subcommittee.
There was no discussion regarding the above meetings.
9. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning & Zoning Member
may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific
factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation
shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
Commissioner Warner asked for a future agenda item regarding development in Area 5 of
Southside; specifically developers building five-bedroom homes.
10. Adjourn.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:20 p.m.
Approved: Attest:
Mike Ashfield, Chairman Brittany Caldwell,Admin. Support Specialist
Planning &Zoning Commission Planning &Development Services
October 17,2013 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3
(*OF""
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION MINUTES
Home of Tffz A&M UniversiV* PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
October 17, 2013, 6:30 p.m.
City Hall Council Chambers
College Station, Texas
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Mike Ashfield, Jodi Warner, Brad Corrier, and Jerome
Rektorik
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Jim Ross and Bo Miles
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Julie Schultz
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Bob Cowell, Lance Simms, Jennifer Prochazka, Jason Schubert,
Matt Robinson, Teresa Rogers, Morgan Hester, Jenifer Paz, Alan Gibbs, Danielle Singh, Erika
Bridges, Robin Cross, Timothy Green, and Brittany Caldwell
L Call Meeting to Order
Chairman Ashfield called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. Pledte of Allegiance
3. Hear Citizens
No one spoke.
4. Consent Agenda
All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations.
4.1 Consideration, possible action, and discussion to approve Meeting Minutes.
• September 19, 2013 —Workshop
• September 19, 2013 —Regular
4.2 Consideration, discussion, and possible action on Absence Requests from meetings.
• Jim Ross —October 17, 2013
4.3 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Indian Lakes Phase
17 consisting of 19 residential lots on approximately 36.4 acres generally located east
of Matoska Ridge Drive in the Indian Lakes Subdivision, approximately one mile
southwest of State Highway 6 South in the City's Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. Case
#13-00900191 (M.Hester)
October 17,2013 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 6
4.4 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Creek Meadows
Section 3 Phase 1 consisting of 24 residential lots on approximately 5.9 acres
generally located at the corner of Creek Meadows Boulevard North and Greens
Prairie Trail. Case#12-00500009 (M.Hester)
4.5 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Preliminary Plan for Reatta Corner
Subdivision consisting of two commercial lots on approximately 3.661 acres
generally located at 4001 Victoria Avenue, southeast corner of Barron Road and
Victoria Avenue. Case#13-00900186 (J.Paz)
4.6 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Reatta Corner
Subdivision consisting of two commercial lots on approximately 3.661 acres
generally located at 4001 Victoria Avenue, southeast corner of Barron Road and
Victoria Avenue. Case#13-00900187 (J.Paz)
4.7 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Castlegate II Section
103 consisting of 39 single-family residential lots on approximately 9.6 acres
generally located at the intersection of Victoria Avenue and Norwich Drive. Case
#13-00900181 (M.Robinson)
Commissioner Warner motioned to approve Consent Agenda Items 4.1 - 4.7
with the addition of Commissioner Miles being added to Item 4.2 for the October
17th meeting. Commissioner Rektorik seconded the motion, motion passed (4-0).
Regular Agenda
5. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent
Agenda by Commission action.
No items were removed from the Consent Agenda.
6. Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a waiver request to Unified Development
Ordinance Section 12-8.3.H.2, "Platting and Replatting in Older Subdivisions," regarding
average lot width and public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a
Final Plat for Breezy Heights Addition Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12, Block 1 being a Replat of
Breezy Heights Addition 1.26 acres, Block 1 consisting of 4 lots on approximately 1.3
acres located at 900 Hereford Street. Case# 13-00900159 (T.Rogers)
Staff Planner Rogers presented the waiver request to average lot width and the replat and
recommended approval.
Trey Guseman, 3131 Briarcrest Drive Suite 111, Bryan, Texas, stated that the lots were
replatted into four lots at an earlier Planning and Zoning meeting, but after speaking with
the neighbors decided that the existing historic house would remain and three lots could
front Welsh Avenue.
Commissioner Corrier motioned to approve the waiver request to average lot width.
Commissioner Rektorik seconded the motion, motion passed (4-0).
October 17,2013 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 6
Chairman Ashfield opened the public hearing.
No one spoke during the public hearing
Chairman Ashfield closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Rektorik motioned to approve the replat. Commissioner Corrier
seconded the motion, motion passed (4-0).
7. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an amendment to
Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by rezoning approximately
7.4 acres in the Crawford Burnett League, Abstract No. 7, College Station, Brazos
County, Texas. Said tract being the same tract of land as described by a deed to Texas
A&M Foundation Trust Company, trustee of the Wanona Carol Randolph charitable
remainder unitrust recorded in Volume 9361, Page 87 of the Official Public Records of
Brazos County, Texas, more generally located at 2900 North Graham Road from PDD
Planned Development District to BPI Business Park Industrial. Case #13-00900189
(T.Rogers)
Staff Planner Rogers presented the rezoning and recommended approval.
Chairman Ashfield opened the public hearing.
No one spoke during the public hearing.
Chairman Ashfield closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Warner motioned to recommend approval of the rezoning.
Commissioner Rektorik seconded the motion, motion passed (4-0).
8. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance
amending the Comprehensive Plan — Future Land Use & Character Map from
Institutional/Public to General Commercial for approximately 4.4 acres for the property
located at 1600 University Drive East at the corner of University Drive East and
Glenhaven Drive. Case#13-00900196 (M.Hester)
Staff Planner Hester presented the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and gave the
following options for action:
• Denial — The property would remain Institutional/Public as currently designated on
the Comprehensive Plan;
• Accept the applicant's proposal of amending the Comprehensive Plan to a General
Commercial designation;
• Propose an alternative land use and character designation for the property.
October 17,2013 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 6
There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding buffer requirements.
Jesse Durden, 2809 Earl Rudder Freeway South, College Station, Texas, gave a
presentation in support of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and stated that the
property is a great location for a General Commercial use because of it being a gateway
into the City. He also said that General Commercial conforms with the existing uses on
University Drive.
Cully Lipsey, 1021 University Drive East, College Station, Texas, representing Scott &
White,read letters from Pappas and Scott&White.
Chairman Ashfield opened the public hearing.
Janet Fanguy, 705 Summerglen, College Station, Texas, expressed concern about the
potential of a restaurant being located on the property and the traffic and noise that would
produce.
Chairman Ashfield closed the public hearing.
There was more discussion amongst the Commission regarding buffers.
Commissioner Corrier motioned to recommend that the City Council accept the
applicant's proposal of amending the Comprehensive Plan to a General Commercial
designation. Commissioner Rektorik seconded the motion, then withdrew his
motion,then seconded the motion again, motion passed (4-0)
9. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance
amending the Comprehensive Plan — Future Land Use & Character Map from Estate to
General Commercial for approximately 5.4 acres for the property located at 1201 Norton
Lane at the corner of Wellborn Road and Norton Lane. Case#13-00900193 (M.Hester)
Staff Planner Hester presented the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and gave the
following options for action:
• Denial — The property would remain Institutional/Public as currently designated on
the Comprehensive Plan;
• Accept the applicant's proposal of amending the Comprehensive Plan to a General
Commercial designation;
• Propose an alternative land use and character designation for the property.
J L Taylor, representative for the church, said that there were inquires on the property,
but only for commercial, not residential. The concerns were the railroad tracks and FM
2154.
There was general discussion amongst the Commission and Staff regarding the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment.
October 17,2013 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 6
Chairman Ashfield opened the public hearing.
Ray Bomnskie, 4691 River Valley Drive, College Station, Texas, said that the property
would be difficult to sell with the Estate designation due to the property being located
next to a mobile home park and its proximity to the railroad tracks.
Janette Dale, 3130 Norton Lane, College Station, Texas, stated that she was opposed to a
large-commercial development on the property.
Juan Rocha, 14097 FM 2154, College Station, Texas, stated that he felt that the property
is better suited for a residential development.
Chairman Ashfield closed the public hearing.
There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding the rezoning.
Commissioner Corrier motioned to recommend that the City Council accept the
applicant's proposal of amending the Comprehensive Plan to a General Commercial
designation. Commissioner Warner seconded the motion, motion passed (3-1).
Commissioner Rektorik was in opposition.
10. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the annual review
of the Comprehensive Plan and the Unified Development Ordinance. (B.Cowell)
Executive Director Cowell gave an overview of the item.
Principal Planner Prochazka presented the annual review of the Comprehensive Plan and
the Unified Development Ordinance.
Chairman Ashfield opened the public hearing.
Ron Gay, 1106 Deacon Drive, College Station, Texas, representing St. Thomas Aquinas
Church, stated that the church would like a larger sign.
Jim Jett, 5004 Congressional Court, College Station, Texas, requested a change to the
Comprehensive Plan. He said that he was currently developing Aggieland Business Park
and recently acquired a 5.5-acre tract on State Highway 47 that he was interested in
changing from Business Park to General Commercial.
John Dylan, 351 Adriatic Parkway,McKinney, Texas, stated that he was the owner of the
20-acre tract adjacent to Mr. Jett's property. He said that he was in support and concurred
with Mr. Jett's recommendation for the land use to be changed from Business Park to
General Commercial.
Kim Eubanks, 351 Adriatic Parkway, McKinney, Texas, bought the property 6 years ago
with Mr. Dylan and agreed that the land use be changed to General Commercial.
October 17,2013 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 6
Chairman Ashfield closed the public hearing.
The Commission concurred with the potential land use change from Business Park to
General Commercial and said that it could be considered as part of a study of the area.
11. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning & Zoning Member
may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific
factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation
shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
There was no discussion regarding future agenda items.
12. Adj ourn.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m.
Approved: Attest:
Mike Ashfield, Chairman Brittany Caldwell,Admin. Support Specialist
Planning &Zoning Commission Planning&Development Services
October 17,2013 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 6
40
(*Arq5*
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
FINAL PLAT
for
Castlegate II Sec 204
13-00900181
SCALE: 41 lots on approximately 18.8 acres
LOCATION: 4401 Toddington Lane
ZONING: GS General Suburban
APPLICANT: Wallace Phillips IV, 3-D Development LLC
PROJECT MANAGER: Matt Robinson, AICP, Senior Planner
mrobinson@cstx.gov
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat.
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 1 of 3
November 7, 2013
J
k
1
M
c
V.
r
m
00
Xc�
y` •Y ' '°�
. `
Al
rQVI
AF W
(D
LU
LU
z, t,.
W
4`
LL
s � ? r-T
i 3. LU
mm
a-
LU
LU
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 2 of 3
November 7, 2013
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: 1995
Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open (upon annexation) to A-O Agricultural Open
and R-1 Single-Family Residential (2007), Renamed to GS
General Suburban.
Preliminary Plat: Castlegate II preliminary plat was approved in January 2011 and
subsequently revised in March 2012.
Site Development: Infrastructure is currently under construction for Sections 101, 103
and 203, with Sections 100 and 200-202 currently platted with
homes under construction.
COMMENTS
Parkland Dedication: Land dedication was provided with the first Final Plat of the
Castlegate II subdivision and the developer is currently
constructing neighborhood park improvements. Community
Parkland dedication fees of$25,625 (41 lots X $625) are due prior
to filing of the Final Plat.
Greenways: N/A
Pedestrian Connectivity: Sidewalks are required and will be provided on both sides of all
thoroughfares and on one side of all local streets. In addition,
sidewalks are proposed to be provided in designated common
areas throughout the development.
Bicycle Connectivity: Bike lanes will be provided along W.S. Phillips Parkway.
Impact Fees: The subject tract is located in the Spring Creek Sanitary Sewer
Impact Fee Area and will be assessed $98.39 per Living Unit
Equivalent (LUE).
REVIEW CRITERIA
Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The proposed Final Plat is in compliance with the
Subdivision Requirements contained in the Unified Development Ordinance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Application
2. Copy of Final Plat
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 3 of 3
November 7, 2013
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO. 1-3— 1ol0
(*Orq"
DATE SUBMITTED:CITY OF COId,1 GI STATION TIME: ' 30A
Hone of Texas AcW University' STAFF: 7
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
(Check one) ❑ Minor ❑ Amending X❑ Final ❑ vacating ❑Replat
($700) ($700) ($932) ($932) ($932)
Is this plat in the ETJ? ❑ Yes ❑ No Is this plat Commercial ❑ or Residential ❑X
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
C1 $7004932 Final Plat Application Fee (see above).
ab $233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee(if applicable).
$600 (minimum) Development Permit Application / Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is
1% of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is> $600, the balance is
due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit).
Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and
tTwo
may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
ourteen (14)folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.)
(2)copies of the grading, drainage, and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report.
Two(2)copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable).
tl Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats(if applicable).
E, Title report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate
current within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership, liens,
encumbrances, etc.
['x,i Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D.
[x] The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
NOTE: A mylar of the approved preliminary plan must be on file before a final plat application will be considered
complete. If the mylar is submitted with the final plat application, it shall be considered a submittal for the
preliminary plan project and processed and reviewed as such. Until the mylar has been confirmed by staff
to be correct, the final plat application will be considered incomplete.
Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference N/A
NAME OF PROJECT Castlegate ll Subdivision-Section 204
ADDRESS Intersection of WS Phillips Parkway and Greens Prairie Road
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT:
Southeast of Castlegate 11 Subdivision, Section 200
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name Wallace Phillips IV E-mail dustyphillips52@yahoo.com
Street Address 4490 Castlegate Drive
City College Station State TX _ Zip Code 77845
Phone Number 979.690.7250 Fax Number 979.690.1041
1/11 Page 1 of 9
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (All owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple
owners):
Name 3-D Development, LLC E-mail dustyphillips52@yahoo.com
Street Address 4490 Castlegate Drive
City College Station State TX Zip Code 77845
Phone Number 979.690.7250 Fax Number 979.690.1041
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name Schultz Engineering, LLC-Joe Schultz E-mail loeschultz84@verizon.net
Street Address 2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A
City College Station _ State TX Zip Code 77845
Phone Number 979.764.3900 Fax Number 979.764.3910
Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property? ❑x Yes ❑ No
Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property?If so, please provide the Volume 10392 and Page No. 276
Total Acreage 18.848 Total No. of Lots 41 R-O-W Acreage 7.28359
Existing Use Agricultural- Vacant Proposed Use Single Family Residential
Number of Lots By Zoning District 41 / R1 / !
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
0.228 / R1
Floodplain Acreage n/a
Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? rj Yes rj No
This informationis necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
rX'J Yes
F-, No
If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name: Castlegate II Preliminary Plat
City Project Number(if known): 12-00500004
Date/Timeframe when submitted: January 2012
1/11 Page 2 of 9
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan (if applicable):
none
Requested waiver to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable):
none -
Regarding the waiver request, explain how:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the
subdivision Tegulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.
2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other
property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance.
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable):
1. F-J11 An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way;
2. F._1 The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the
purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan;
3. F- A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12) months;
4. Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate/
rural context;
5. F_.i When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Master Plan;
1/11 Page 3 of 9
6. Fj The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and
Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO; or
7. F'j The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway I Expressway as designated by Map 6.6,
Thoroughfare Plan- Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Detailed explanation of condition identified above:
NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the
same time by the Planning &Zoning Commission.
Requested Oversize Participation
Total Linear Footage of parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
Proposed Public:
4445Streets ACREAGE:
8400 No. of acres to be dedicated +$ development fee
_ _Sidewalks
1No. of acres in floodplain
220
Sanitary Sewer Lines
2085 Water Lines No. of acres in detention
No. of acres in greenways
- Channels
1165OR
Storm Sewers
- Bike Lanes/Paths FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
No. of SF Dwelling Units X$ _ $
(date)Approved by Parks& Recreation Advisory Board
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are
true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more
than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. LIEN
HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as
described above.
r6, 1"7
Signature and title Date
1/11 Page 4 of 9
P-X-U-M.—D
M7
..........
.pa.p.
q..j
WN,
11 L
i5i5 T4
v
24 1UR
LEE
pp polo
HMO
MaQ
3 -zr
M1 1 1
Solna; 111 01 1 oz m 1
1WIRMI ULUMUMBRI MI LK U 1
................
Hil M1 He 11w 11 0 pi
ON 1 M
HIM N W
MUM
H1011-1 - - "I R Ri
lei WHINHHHURM M IM
1111 H 11 H 1 N 10 U!'"11
im 1 RM h HSI
!gig j $se ash
13I
SUM
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
PRELIMINARY PLAN
for
Summit Crossing Phase 2A
13-00900200
SCALE: 46 lots on 5.607 acres
LOCATION: 1447 Buena Vista, generally north of Harvey Road and east of
Crescent Pointe
ZONING: PDD Planned Development District
APPLICANT: Rabon Metcalf, RME Consulting Engineers
PROJECT MANAGER: Matt Robinson, AICP, Senior Planner
mrobinson@cstx.gov
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 1 of 4
November 7, 2013
_ w
AF
IL
LU
IL
CD
CD
Ilk,
Xr0-
/.`y.' (f)
s .y
411
J
" s
�x LU.00 •
rr �
J
Lk
M 4
LU
h rt`f
It
jaojj�— -116
yy y
r C
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 2 of 4
November 7,2013
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: 1980
Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open to PDD Planned Development District
(2003); revision to PDD Planned Development District (2007)
Site development: Phase 1 of Summit Crossing is currently developed with
townhomes.
COMMENTS
Water: There are existing 8-inch waterlines along Lonetree Drive and
Buena Vista. Domestic and fire flow demands will necessitate
future water main extensions with the Final Plat. These utilities
will be required to be designed and constructed in accordance
with the BCS Unified Design Guidelines.
Sewer: Sanitary sewer service will be provided from existing 6-inch and 8-
inch mains which were extended to serve this phase with the
construction of Summit Crossing Phase 1. A sewer report for the
subdivision is required with the Final Plat, but preliminary analysis
of the existing system has indicated that there is available
capacity to serve this development. Sewer is to be provided to
each lot in accordance with the BCS Unified Design Guidelines.
Off-site Easements: An offsite private drainage easement will be needed for private
detention and drainage infrastructure with the Final Plat.
Drainage: The subject tract is located in the Hudson Creek drainage basin.
Development of the subject tract will be required to meet the
requirements of the BCS Unified Stormwater Design Guidelines.
Detention will be required when the property is final platted.
Flood Plain: No portion of the property has been designated FEMA Special
Flood Hazard Area.
Greenways: No greenway dedication is required or proposed.
Pedestrian Connectivity: Sidewalks will be continued along Buena Vista and Lone Tree
Drive.
Bicycle Connectivity: There are no planned bicycle improvements proposed with the
Preliminary Plan and none called for as part of the Bicycle,
Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan.
Streets: The proposed development will continue Buena Vista and Lone
Tree Drive, which connect to Harvey Road to the south.
Oversize Request: None at this time.
Parkland Dedication Fees: Park land dedication was previously dedicated with initial
development (Summit Crossing Phase 1). Neighborhood parkland
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 3 of 4
November 7, 2013
development fees of$16,468 (46 lots x $358) will be due prior to
filing of the Final Plat.
Impact Fees: None in this area currently.
REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance: The
subject property is designated Urban on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and
Character Map. The property is currently zoned PDD Planned Development District with
townhomes the intended use as proposed with this Preliminary Plan.
2. Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The proposed Preliminary Plan is in
compliance with the Subdivision Regulations contained in the Unified Development
Ordinance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Application
2. Copy of Preliminary Plan
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 4 of 4
November 7, 2013
" FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
(*O
CASE NO.: v5
DATE SUBMITTED: 13
CITY OF COLIIIGE STATION TIME: : D
STAFF: ki
Home of Texru A&M Univenity"
PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
$932 Preliminary Plan Application Fee.
[]_.$233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee(if applicable).
Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used
Nand may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pager if additional information is provided.
rX7 ,Fourteen(14)folded copies of plan.A revised mylar original must be submitted after approval.
[I Title report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate
current within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership, liens,
encumbrances, etc.
[] impact study(if oversized participation is requested).
The attached Preliminary Plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are
not.
Date of Optional Preapplication Conference
NAME OF PROJECT Summit Crossing-Phase 2A
ADDRESS N/A
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION:
SW(back side of existing subdivision) of Summit Crossing, Phase One
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name RME Consulting Engineers(c/o Rabon Metcalf) E-mail rabon@rmengineer.com
Street Address 3800 S.H. No. 6 South, Suite 108G
City College Station State TX Zip Code 77845
Phone Number (979) 764-0704 Fax Number (979) 764-0704
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (ALL owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple
owners):
Name The Summit Crossing, LLC(c%Jim Easterly) E-mail limeasterly@gmail.com
Street Address 809 University Drive E, Ste. 1018
College Station State TX _Zip Code 77840
City _
Phone Number (979)218-6775 Fax Number
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name Same As Applicant E-mail
Street Address
City State Zip Code
Phone Number Fax Number
1111 Page 1 of 6
Total Acreage 5-608 Total No. of Lots 46 R-O-W Acreage 1.480
Number of Lots By Zoning District 46 / PD l 1
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
0.090 / PD
Floodplain Acreage 0.00
NOTE: Appropriate zoning for the proposed subdivision must be in place before this application can be
considered complete.
Are you proposing to dedicate park land by acreage or fee in lieu of land? NAA
Are you proposing to F_ develop the park I— dedicate the development fee?(Check one)
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s)and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
rX Yes
F- No
If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications(provide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name: Summit Crossing
City Project Number(in known):
Date/Timeframe when submitted: July 2007 to September 2007
Requested wavier to subdivision regulations and reason for same(if applicable):
1111 Page 2 of 6
Regarding the waiver request, explain how:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the
subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.
2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other
property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
(accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance.
1
I
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition(if applicable):
1. F An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way;
2. F The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the
purposes and goals of the LIDO or the City's comprehensive Plan;
3. r A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve(12) months;
4. r Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate/
rural context;
5. F_ When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Master Plan;
1111 Page 3 of 6
6. r The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and
Replotting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO;or
7. f The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway I Expressway as designated by Map 6.6,
Thoroughfare Plan-Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan,
Detailed explanation of condition identified above:
NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the
same time by the Planning&Zoning Commission.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached
hereto are true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE
OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from
the owner. if thane is more than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney, if
the owner is a company, the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's
representative to sigh the application on its behalf LIEN HOLDERS identified in the title report are also
considered owners and the appropriate signatures musl be provided as described above.
"- A q�aa- — q -, to , (3
Signat e a d title r Date
l e4 JuCI PL 0-
Page 4 of 6
i7•d 7.R97.R97.fi/B Bulssoa0 I!wwnS dZti:£0 £l. 0l• deS
A AM, oil Z
Nn
�13
Fgo
PLO oil
C)
a"
5 -
pg,,jp,jj11 gy Hill!
lit, �D
gull 0
1;is in is ail eg i 55 a
Nj ,
_40- 1 1 .2 1
T--
------- -- --------- 552-1 F-28&Od
TV—
CL
ImgF daill
goJJt—
imRAM RI � 8
O .8.8.8
ASO=me S
I IR I
---F-7----t---t---
1 SO
ADVOk A kXMkP N
d W
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
FINAL PLAT
for
Caprock Crossing Lots 1 R &2R, Block 2
Being a Replat of
Caprock Crossing Lot 1, Block 2
13-00900121
SCALE: Two lots on 8.15 acres
LOCATION: 950 William D Fitch Pkwy
ZONING: GC General Commercial
OV Corridor Overlay
APPLICANT: Jesse Durden, CapRock Texas
PROJECT MANAGER: Matt Robinson, AICP, Senior Planner
mrobinson@cstx.gov
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat.
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 1 of 3
November 7, 2013
qac <c
5l q M
N
14
U
is Y
U7 m
t I� Uc\I
Y °n
0 -
IL
rIL o
Q J
uj
U
W
4
w
J i '-
i '
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 2 of 3
November 7, 2013
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: 1983
Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open upon annexation; A-O Agricultural Open to
C-1 General Commercial (1983, 2004 & 2006); C-1 General
Commercial to C-1 General Commercial and OV Corridor Overlay
(2006); C-1 General Commercial renamed to GC General
Commercial (2012)
Preliminary Plat: 2012
Site Development: Vacant
COMMENTS
Parkland Dedication: None required — non-residential development.
Greenways: N/A
Pedestrian Connectivity: Public Ways are proposed throughout the development which
include 5-foot sidewalks along both sides of the drive aisle.
Bicycle Connectivity: Bike lanes and routes are not proposed nor required within the
development. The nearest bike lane is located on Arrington Road.
Impact Fees: The subject property is located within the Alum Creek Impact Fee
Area. Impact fees are assessed at the time of Final Plat. The
current impact fees for Alum Creek are $59.42 per LUE.
REVIEW CRITERIA
Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The Final Plat is in compliance with the
Subdivision Requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Application
2. Copy of Final Plat
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 3 of 3
November 7, 2013
FOR OFFIC E Y
CASE NO.:
DATE SUBMI D: I
CITY OF COLLTSGI s STAI'ION TIME:
Home of Texas A6M University' STAF
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
(Check one) ❑ Minor ❑ Amending ❑ Final ❑ Vacating , Replat
($700) ($700) ($932) ($932) ($932)
Is this plat in the ETJ? ❑ Yes 0 No Is this plat Commercial ❑ or Residential ❑
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
$700-$932 Final Plat Application Fee(§iee above).
[] $233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee(if applicable).
$600 (minimum) Development Permit Application / Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is
1%of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is > $600, the balance is
due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit).
Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and
may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
Fourteen (14)folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.)
❑ Two (2)copies of the grading, drainage, and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report.
C] Two (2)copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents(if applicable).
]] Gopy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats(if applicable).
Title report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate
current within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership, liens,
encumbrances, etc.
Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D.
] The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
NOTE: A mylar of the approved preliminary plan must be on file before a final plat application will be considered
complete. If the mylar is submitted with the final plat application, it shall be considered a submittal for the
preliminary plan project and processed and reviewed as such. Until the mylar has been confirmed by staff
to be correct, the final plat application will be considered incomplete.
Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference
NAME OF PROJECT Caprock Crossing Lot 1, Block 2 Replat
ADDRESS y,A41t'SH6 South
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT:
Louth of the intersection of William D. Fitch Parkway and SH 6 South
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name CapRock Texas E-mail Jesse.durden@caprocktx.com
Street Address 110 Lincoln Avenue, Suite 103
City College Station State Texas Zip Code 77840
Phone Number 979-307-0321 Fax Number 979-314-7606
1/11 Page 1 of
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (All owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple
owners): ,n,) /� n�try
Name Brazos Texas Land Development, LLC. E-mail a
5
Street Address 1203 University Drive East
City College Station State Texas Zip Code 77840
Phone Number Fax Number 979-314-7606
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name Schultz Engineering, LLC. -Deven Doyen, P.E. E-mail deven@schultzengineeringllc.com
Street Address 2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A
City College Station State Texas _ Zip Code 77845
Phone Number 979-764-3900 Fax Number 979-764-3910
Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property? ❑ Yes ❑X No
Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so, please provide the Volume and Page No.
Total Acreage 8.15 Total No. of Lots 2 R-O-W Acreage 0
Existing Use Vacant Proposed Use Commercial
Number of Lots By Zoning District 2 / C1 1 /
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
Floodplain Acreage N/A
Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels)on the property? r Yes r No
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s)and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
F- Yes
17 No
If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications(provide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name:
City Project Number(if known):
Date/Timeframe when submitted:
1/11 Page 2 of 9
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan (if applicable).
Lot 1, Blockas been divided into two lots-
Requested
o s.Requested waiver to subdivision regulations and reason for same if applicable):
None --
Regarding the waiver request, explain how:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the
subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.
A
2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
NIA
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other
property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
NIA
4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance.
/A
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable):
1. r An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way;
2. r The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the
purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan;
3. F A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve(12) months;
4. r Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate/
rural context;
5. r When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Master Plan;
1/11 Page 3 of 9
6. F The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and
Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO; or
7. F The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway I Expressway as designated by Map 6.6,
Thoroughfare Plan -Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Detailed explanation of condition identified above:
NIA
NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the
same time by the Planning &Zoning Commission.
Requested Oversize Participation NIA
Total Linear Footage of Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
Proposed Public:
ACREAGE:
Streets
0 Sidewalks 0
No. of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee
747Sanitary Sewer Lines
0 No. of acres in floodplain
No. of acres in detention
� Water Lines 0 _Channels Q
No. of acres in greenways
OR
0 Storm Sewers
Bike Lanes/Paths FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
No. of SF Dwelling Units X$ _ $
(date)Approved by Parks& Recreation Advisory Board
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are
true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more
than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. LIEN
HOLDERS identified in the title report are also co ' ere wners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as
described above.
� r
Signature and title Date
�kl l �S M Pry L D 10900(�
1/11 Page 4 of 9
2 0
-- -------------- --
I��.. ^. -'� �not !a!
NH
i
yi
ao
iia EBpiz oil
sIpiS lf
PH
> af
pu p
�JI�--I��g
11M
0
Aw Ise?
1
'you
wS
OWN
Qe zm= ---------- ---
01 OEM,
Will
PH
"LA
UPS
was its-
'VOR,
5UNI -0
Joe;
A >0 I
IN.
(*t/q"
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Horne of Texas Ad-M University®
REZONING REQUEST
FOR
1600 UNIVERSITY DR EAST
13-00900197
REQUEST: O Office with OV Corridor Overlay to GC General Commercial with
OV Corridor Overlay
SCALE: One lot on approximately 4.4 acres
LOCATION: 1600 University Dr East, generally located at the southwest corner
of Glenhaven Drive and University Drive East
APPLICANT: Jesse Durden, CapRock Texas
PROJECT MANAGER: Morgan Hester, Staff Planner
mhester@cstx.gov
RECOMMENDATION: A request has been submitted for this property to amend the
Comprehensive Plan from Institutional/Public to General
Commercial. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this
request on October 17, 2013 and recommended approval with a
4-0 vote. City Council will hear this request and make the final
action at their November 14, 2013 meeting. Contingent on City
Council's approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment
request, Staff recommends approval of the proposed rezoning.
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 1 of 6
November 7, 2013
W
Ali j;
LU
LY
a LU
co
tv
M
l
1 —
ah ,
� F i uj
uj
W
i41
d _ ❑_
i W
uj
t, w
ai
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 2 of 6
November 7, 2013
�a [a o 0
4 C7
e�A� op o 0 _ U
LU
oozes= ani '
o� ao w
y' ❑ o mat o-3 > E
S9 U •N pyo o_"a of
V a o a) o
� N 'S0'a`LD .
�j aa [.o p CJ I p
hq• t? CJ p {h{h C?7p0
o,� - 0 m a zzz4Lrs
4 .
OD
60
)
u
Sr.
♦ / � cn o a c a
[Y7 C L C
1 r N C�'7 ,p" CO M Z
mzJ J=CJ�a
o w p w
LO
m u Qc a
w �
Ln o
{ LI) Ik W w
l
N
� - o�.a� o
\r Itr m ga EECy r
h • x f CD a5 7 m o
LU
N
4h
Q {
r
w
di �, � LU
LU
.. . . .
1
Q LJ
LULU
[}i r3 P-5
't � �w�ChulpF
LO
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 3 of 6
November 7,2013
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: November 7, 2013
Advertised Council Hearing Dates: November 25, 2013
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station's
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
Summerglen HOA
Post Oak Forest HOA
Contacts in support: None at the time of this report.
Contacts in opposition: None at the time of this report.
Inquiry contacts: None at the time of this report.
ADJACENT LAND USES
Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use
General Commercial
North (across Restaurants and
University Drive East) General Commercial with OV Corridor retail
Overlay
Neighborhood T Town home with Glenhaven Estates
South Conservation NPO Neighborhood (Single-family
Prevailing Overlay residential)
East (across General Commercial
Glenhaven Drive) Institutional/Public with OV Corridor Scott &White Clinic
Overlay
Neighborhood T Town home with Glenhaven Estates
West Conservation NPO Neighborhood (Single-family
Prevailing Overlay residential)
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: August 1958
Zoning: R-3 Townhouse (back portion of property) March 1981
A-P Administrative Professional (front portion of property) March 1981
A-P Administrative Professional (back portion of property) December
1984
OV Corridor Overlay January 1992
Final Plat: June 1985 Glenhaven Estates Phase 6
Site development: Scott &White Offices
REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject property is designated at
Institutional/Public on the Comprehensive Plan. GC General Commercial is not consistent
with this designation. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment request is currently being
processed for this property to amend the Future Land Use and Character Map from
Institutional/Public to General Commercial.
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 4 of 6
November 7, 2013
2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and
with the character of the neighborhood: The subject property is currently zoned O Office
and abuts a single-family area, designated as Neighborhood Conservation on the
Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The existing medical clinic acts as a transition between the
single-family residential areas and University Drive East and the major commercial activities
that occur along it.
With the proposed General Commercial zoning, an increased amount of traffic can be
anticipated. The Unified Development Ordinance requires screening and buffering between
commercial and residential properties. Permitted development would include all uses within
the General Commercial zoning district.
3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The proposed
rezoning for this property is GC General Commercial from O Office. Immediately adjacent to
this property is an area zoned T Townhome, a single-family use in an area designated as
Neighborhood Conservation on the Comprehensive Plan. A GC General Commercial
zoning will allow for development that is more intense than what is permitted in the current O
Office zoning district. Requirements are in place to protect single-family properties that abut
commercial developments, such as a buffering, allowable building height, and permitted site
lighting, but these will not mitigate all impacts. This property is a corner lot along a major
arterial with a signalized intersection.
4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The current
O Office zoning of the property acts as a transitional buffer from University Drive East to the
abutting single-family development. Office uses typically operate during working hours of
8:00 am to 5:00 pm which limits the amount of noise and need for site lighting in the
evening. Uses that are permitted in this zoning typically do not cater to the general public
and create less traffic than a commercial development.
5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The
applicant states as a justification for the request that the Scott &White clinic will relocate to
the new hospital in the Medical District, leaving this property with an office land use that will
no longer be marketable. It is understood that the current owner is restricting the use of the
property so it may not be used for medical use. Adjacent property, across Glenhaven Drive,
owned by the same party is currently zoned GC General Commercial though also
designated Institutional/Public on the Comprehensive Plan.
6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally
suitable and adequate for the proposed use: Water service to the property is provided by
an existing 16-inch water main running along the south side of University Drive East and an
8-inch waterline along the west side of Glenhaven Drive. Domestic and fire flow demands
may necessitate future water main extensions at the time of site development. There are
currently two 8-inch sanitary sewer mains extending across Glenhaven Drive to serve the
property. The proposed General Commercial land use may create more intensity and
preliminary analysis of the system has indicated that there is available capacity to serve this
type of development.
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 5 of 6
November 7, 2013
The subject tract is located in the Carters Creek drainage basin. No portion of the property
has been designated FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area. Development of the subject tract
will be required to meet the requirements of the City's Storm Water Design Guidelines, and
site development impacts on the drainage system will be evaluated further at that time.
The current zoning is O Office and could generate up to approximately 749 vehicles per day
(VPD). The proposed GC General Commercial zoning could generate up to approximately
2,200 VPD, a net increase of 1,451 VPD. TxDOT's 2009 traffic counts along University
Drive East in this area are 34,000 VPD and the City's travel demand model projected to
2011 indicates a volume of 42,000 VPD. In this area, University Drive East has a capacity
of 60,000 VPD with a level of service (LOS) "D" being at 50,000 VPD. University Drive
East's capacity is sufficient; however, changes may have to be made to the traffic signal
timing along this corridor. At the time of site changes, a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) will be
required if more than 150 vehicle trips are generated in the peak hour.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
A request has been submitted for this property to amend the Comprehensive Plan from
Institutional/Public to General Commercial. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this
request on October 17, 2013 and recommended approval with a 4-0 vote. City Council will hear
this request and make the final action at their November 14, 2013 meeting. Contingent on City
Council's approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment request, Staff recommends
approval of the proposed rezoning.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Application
2. Rezoning map
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 6 of 6
November 7, 2013
i
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO.:
DATE SUBMITTED: ' l 3�
TIME:
CATYor.coyix.Gi;SrirlON STAFF: A�T
Hanrr of Tarnrd�hf Unlrenirj
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING) APPLICATION
GENERAL
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
i
$1,165 Rezoning Application Fee.
LXJ Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used
and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional Information is provided.
;/TraImpact Analysis or calculations of projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA is not necessary for
the proposed request.
ffic
One(1)copy of a fully dimensioned map on 24"x 36"paper showing:
a. Land affected;
b. Legal description of area of proposed change:
c. Present zoning;
d. Zoning classification of all abutting land;and
e. All public and private rights-of-way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land.
Written legal description of subject property(metes& bounds or lot&block of subdivision,whichever is
applicable).
E] A CAD(dxf/dwg)-model space State Plane NAD 83 or GIS(shp)digital fife(e-mailed to
p&DS_Digital_Submittal@cstx.gov).
NOTE: If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shall not be filed
within a period of 180 days from the date of denial,except with permission of the Planning&Zoning Commission.
Date of Optional Preapplication Conference
NAME OF PROJECT 1600 University Drive ReZoning
ADDRESS 1600 University Drive, Cottage Station, TX 77840 1
i
LEGAL DESCRIPTION(Lot,Block, Subdivision) Stock 16, Glenhaven Subdivision
GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPERTY, IF NOT PLATTED:
TOTAL ACREAGE 4.37
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION(Primary contact for the project):
Name CapRock Texas E-mail Jesse.durden@ceprocktx.com
Street Address 2809 Earl Rudder Freeway S, Ste. 203
College Station State TX Zip Code 77845
City g j
Phone Number 979-307-0321 Fax Number 979-314-7606
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name Scott&White Memorial Hospital c%Hoelscher, Lipsey, Elmore&Pool E-mail culiy@hle.com
Street Address 1021 University Drive East
City College station State TX Zip Code 77840
Phone Number 979-314-1172 Fax Number 979-846-4725
Page 1 of 3
tato
OTHER CONTACTS(Please specify type of contact,i.e. project manager,potential buyer,local contact,etc.):
Name E-mail
Street Address
City State Zip Code
Phone Number Fax Number
I
This property was conveyed to owner by deed dated Oct. 16, 9987 and recorded in Volume 1006 , page 230
of the Brazos County Official Records.
Existing Zoning O-Office Proposed Zoning GC-General Commercial w/Corridor Over
Present Use of Property Medical Clinic
Proposed Use of Property General Commercial
I
REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION
1. List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary.
For nearly 3 decades,the subject tract has been operated as a medical facility by Scott&White Memorial Hospital
("SW"). With the opening of the now SW Hospital and relocation of SW personnel to the Medical Corridor, the tract
needs to be repositioned to achieve its highest and best use for the Owner and the City. General commercial
zoning supports strong tax generating Industries like retail,restaurants and hotels. The tract is located at the
gateway into College Station,and therefore should be zoned In a manner that encourages uses that create regional
demand.
i
i
I
2. Indicate whether or not this zone change is In accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not,explain why the
Plan is incorrect.
Due to the longevity of SW s operation, the Comprehensive Plan designation for the tract has remained
"Institutional/Public". Because SW has now vacated the facility, this Land Use and Character designation Is no
longer appropriate.
The Owner and Applicant have submitted a Comprehensive Plan Amendment application which is currently being
review by the City. That application aligns directly with this rezoning request.
3. How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with
the character of the neighborhood?
The requested rezoning will result in uses that are 1)compatible with nearby uses, 2)responsible, and 3)
reasonable given the tract's location,adjacency to University Drive and State Highway 6, and its size(nearly 4.5
acres).Per the UDO, General Commercial zoned properties are those that"provide locations for general
commercial purposes, that is,retail sales and service uses that function to serve the entire community and its
visitors."This tract is situated In the heart of College Stations restaurant and retail corridor on a light-controlled hard
corner and is no doubt a superb and well-suited General Commercial tract.
10110 Page 2 of 3
4. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested.
If rezoned to General Commercial,the property will be a premier redevelopment site at the main gateway Into
College Station. General Commercial zoning will make possible the highest and best use of the property,and will
surely help attract first-class developments that create regional draws and have regional impacts. Zoning the
property to enything other that General Commercial will limit its potential to becoming a distinctive and renowned
site.
I
5. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
As currently zoned,the tract is unsuitable for redevelopment and reinvestment or for occupancy by medical office
users. Without a rezoning, economic factors and medical use restrictions will ensure the property remains in its
current state-likely becoming a dark spot on the otherwise bustling University Drive. Even if rezoned to Suburban
Commercial,the tract will be potentlally void of reinvestment. Suburban Commercial zoning will limit restaurant
sizes to a maximum of 8,000 SF-not nearly large enough fore 4+acre tract. In short,by keeping the current
zoning designation or applying a designation of Suburban Commercial, the City will fall to realize the intent of the I
Comprehensive Plan and the great potential for the property.
6. Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
The tract,as currently zoned,is highly unmarketable. Other medical providers will have no use for the facility,as
SW must restrict the tract against use by other medical providers in order to remain competitive and ensure the
success of their new hospital. For other office users,the cost of the land and the function obsolescence of the
building make it undesirable. The best opportunity for the City and the Owner is incentivize redevelopment and
reinvestment In the area by allowing those general commercial uses that have major local and regional impacts.
7. List any other reasons to support this zone change.
i
Given a successful rezoning, there is no doubt that the property will redevelop and emerge as a premier site that
creates regional opportunities for tourism,retail,restaurants,and/or other commerce. The tract,once properly
ositioned, will create a real opportunity for economic development and a sizeable expansion of the City's tax base.
i
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,
correct and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION iS FiLED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more
than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. It the owner is a company, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf.
Signature and title Date
S'AAHtrJ MoTat
Fam m&- -, �N D eea
4040- SCO-r-I 4_W H 11r—Mr?n&*+L%A Print Form Page 3 of 3
kesPiT.4-t
.L
� c
Y -
73 e.
5
_ az
. y I LU
ul l >
IJ. gy q. ist _
t d W
• c GOFyu�
r
� UjLLJ
Lu
v v
�-
, II
u.