HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/26/1989 - Workshop Minutes City Council MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING
WEDNESDAY, JULY 26v 1989
4:00 P.M.
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT:
Mayor Ringer, Councilmembers Brown,
McIlhaney, Gardner, Haddox, Birdwe11
COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:
Councilman Schneider
STAFF PRESENT:
City Manager Ragland, City Secretary
Jones, Assistant City Manager Brymer,
City Attorney Locke, Assistant City
Manager Woody, Traffic Engineer Black,
Director of Development Services Ash,
Planning Director Callaway, CD
Director Fette, Energy Specialist
Shear, Budget Director Schroeder,
Finance Director Harrison, Public
Information Officer Calliham,
Assistant City Secretary Hooks
VISITORS PRESENT:
See guest register.
Aqenda Item No. i - Presentation of report from the Ad Hoc Sidewalk
Committee. ( Council Issue No. 10).
Traffic Engineer John Black stated that he enjoyed working with the
Sidewalk Committee. Ms. Jane Sielken, Vice-Chairman of the Sidewalk
Committee, explained the study and gave an overhead presentation.
She pointed out that the committee prioritized the sidewalks which
they thought were the most important. She noted that $50,000 was
set aside for this program at the direction of the Council, and the
top eight streets listed were the committee's choices for these
designated monies.
Councilman Haddox inquired about the numerous streets listed below
the first eight streets. Ms. Sielken replied that these streets are
to be included in the Capital Improvement Program 1991-1993.
Mrs. Sielken described each of the eight priority streets.
Councilman McIlhaney asked if the sidewalks would be located on the
city's right-of-way. Mr. Black responded that the city crew is
doing a survey to determine easements, tree locations, and property
lines, so that sidewalk location can be addressed.
Councilman Gardner commented on the practicality of locating the
sidewalks so that existing landscaping will not be disturbed.
Councilman Birdwell stated that the city's present ordinance should
be reviewed in regard to requirements for sidewalks; he pointed out
that sidewalk requirements should be considered as development takes
007361
City Council Workshop Meeting
Wednesday, July 26, 1989
Page 2
place He suggested that sidewalk requirements could be included as
part of the building permit process. Mayor Ringer asked the com-
mittee to look at current city ordinances and see if other guide-
lines should be established.
Development Services Director Elrey Ash announced that Traffic
Engineer John Black will be leaving the city; he thanked John for
his hard work and dedication during the last ten years.
Councilman Brown moved to direct staff to implement the
recommendations made by the Sidewalk Committee. Councilman
McIlhaney seconded the motion, which carried unanimously, 6-0.
After additional discussion, Councilman Birdwell moved to ask staff
to look into the possibility of an assessment program to recover a
portion of the sidewalk funds.
Councilman Gardner seconded the motion.
The motion was defeated by a vote of 1-5, as follows:
FOR: Councilman Birdwell
AGAINST: Mayor Ringer, Councilmen Brown, McIlhaney, Gardner, and
Haddox
Agenda Item No. 2 - Discussion of 1989 General Obliqation Bond Issue
and related Capital Construction Project. (Council Issue No. 3 and
No. 12)
Finance Director Harrison and Financial Advisor David Fetzer
presented this item. Mr. Harrison stated that as part of the FY
1989, the Council approved the issuance of $3,225,000 in authorized
but un-issued general obligation bonds. He explained that bond
proceeds are to be used for $1,600,000 in street improvements,
$700,000 in right-of-way acquisition, and $925,000 for completion of
the Public Services building.
Mr. Fetzer presented the Council with a proposed amortization
schedule at 7% and other schedules showing annual payments.
Mr. Schroeder showed overhead transparencies indicating projections
based on the last issue for the next few years without additional
revenues. He added that the debt issue for the Chamber of Commerce
will be paid in FY 1991-92.
Councilman Gardner asked if there are any bonds that were sold but
the money not spent. Mr. Harrison replied that there is
approximately $5.6 million of utility revenue bonds, but this money
can only be spent for authorized projects.
Mr. Fetzer explained that under the current tax code and regulations
of the Internal Revenue Service, the city could earn arbitrage if
the bond issue is kept under $5 million. Discussion followed.
007362
City Council Workshop Meeting
Wednesday, July 26, 1989
Page 3
Agenda Item No. 3 - (Item Removed}.
This item was removed by staff prior to the meeting.
Agenda Item No. 5 - Discussion of the 1989-90 Community Development
budqet, inclusive of the 1989-90 Community Development Final State-
ment.
CD Director Fette presented this item. He explained the anticipated
end of fiscal year balances. Staff proposed to transfer the balance
of $22,000 from administration to Housing Assistance. Staff has
also applied for a $100,000 rental rehabilitation grant from the
Texas Department of Commerce. He pointed out the total balance of
the Community Development budget, $1,451,600.
Aqenda Item No. 4 - Discussion of desiqnatinq additional Community
Development target areas. (Councll Issues No. 2 and No. 7)
Mr. Fette pointed out two additional target areas that are eligible
for designated CD monies, where a large number of residents are
classified as low-to-moderate income and where the need for
improvements is relatively large. He showed a colored map and
indicated the present CD target areas. Mr. Fette addressed the
status of the North Gate area and pointed out that the largest
direct result of this designation would occur through the avail-
ability of CD funds for infrastructure and public facilities.
Presently, the City is allocating $175,000 a year of its CD grant
for these purposes. He stated that a survey of the Welsh Street
area is currently being made.
After general discussion of the areas, Mayor Ringer suggested that
the council, at the regular meeting, might direct staff to include
an additional two blocks in the area northeast of Fairview if the
survey proves the area to be eligible. He added that the complete
street should be renovated.
Mr. Ash asked council for authorization to begin the project already
scheduled for Luther Street, and to include this portion of Luther
Street on the future street program, if the additional area is
eligible.
Aqenda Item No. 6 - Presentation an disousslon of Enerqyscape -
Residential Shading for Energy Cost Savings in College Station,
(Council Issue No. 8)
Energy Specialist Charlie Shear presented this item. He began by
stating that the Energy Management Center in the Governor's office
is requesting proposals from local governments for the Local
Governments Competitive Grants. This program is funded with oil
overcharge refunds in accordance with the Oil Overcharge Restitu-
tionary Act. He introduced two consultants, Dr. Bill Hazard and Mr.
Ettis Oliver.
007363
City Council Workshop Meeting
Wednesday, July 26, 1989
Page 4
Mr. Shear introduced the objective of the program, Energyscape,
developed by Dr. Bill Hazard.
Mr. Oliver explained that the goal of the program is to design an
energy efficient landscape program for single family residences in
College Station. The primary source of funds for this program will
be the Energy Management Center in the Governor's office. He
described the four primary sources of wasted energy in homes. This
program relates to three of these sources, solar radiation through
windows, conductive heat transmission, and heat retention by walls
and attic.
He presented five stages to this program as follows:
1. Acquire and annotate existing topographic maps at a scale of 1"
to 100' showing several factors of this program.
2. Conduct a new stereo aerial photography of the city.
3. Update the existing maps onto video disks.
4. Prepare an interactive computer graphics program showing the
placement of landscaping.
5. Train city personnel to select landscaping and shading
symbols for entry into the interactive computer graphics program.
Mr. Shear explained the funding aspect of the project. He stated
that the cost of the program is $158,160, of which $140,640 is
requested from the Local Competitive Grants Program and will be
allocated to the contracted work; the remaining $17,520 is requested
from the Energy Project Fund, (current balance of this fund is
$381,000). Existing staff will be utilized for the program. Mr.
Shear added that this proposal must be submitted by August 4th.
Councilman Gardner stated several concerns.
Councilman McIlhaney asked if this program has been established in
other cities. Mr. Shear replied that this program is unique.
Councilman Haddox asked if the money could be applied to purchase
trees. Mr. Shear replied that there, is no available space to
maintain the trees. Mr. Haddox suggested that some monies be
allocated from the Energy Fund to buy trees. Mr. Shear explained
that the proposal must be competitive, transferable to other cities,
and unique. Mr. Haddox stated that he would be interested in
furnishing trees to citizens who participate in the energy savings
program. Councilman Brown recommended that the city go with the
program, then at a later time, the city could look into the
possibility of a tree give-away program. Mr. Oliver remarked that
the local nurseries will participate actively in the program.
Councilman Haddox suggested that the amount proposed be raised to
$200,000 and a tree give-away incentive be added. Mr. Shear agreed
that the additional activity would greatly enhance the program.
007364
City Council Workshop Meeting
Wednesday, July 26, 1989
Page 5
Agenda Item No. 10 - City Manaqer Concerns.
City Manager Ragland announced that tickets are available for the
City of College Station Recognition Banquet.
He reported on the meeting of the 911 Board of Directors; he stated
that the city has agreed to wait on participating in the purchase of
the enhanced 911 system. Bryan and Brazos County have pursued
consolidated dispatch, and they have agreed to order the equipment
for College Station, for a future date when College Station decides
to participate in a consolidated dispatch operation. He noted that
at the next meeting, the County will make a presentation on this
topic.
He provided a safety policies and procedures manual to each council
member. He also presented copies of the MIS status report.
Councilman Haddox commented that he would like to see the city
participate in a cooperative education program with Texas A&M
University. The City of Bryan currently employs this program.
Mr. Ragland stated that the Personnel Department is looking into
this arrangement.
Mayor Ringer and City Manager Ragland left the meeting.
Mayor Pro-tem Brown presided over the meeting.
Aqenda Item No. 7 - Discussion of a proposed ordinance amendinq
Section 6C and Section 9 of Chapter 9 of the Code requirinq the
submission of a master development plan as a part of the preliminary
subdivision plat application requirements and amendinq the oversize
participation provisions of the subdivision ordinance (Council Issue
No. 9).
City Engineer Pullen described the item. He stated that staff met
with two developers who were interested in the proposed changes. He
listed the developer's five items of concern, as follows:
1) In regard to oversize participation, the proposed ordinance
appears to favor small developers over large developers.
2) The proposed ordinance has an impact study requirement for
traffic, water, and sanitary sewer.
3) The proposed amendment does not state a minimize size for street
participation.
4) The developers proposed a year for construction to begin, instead
of the six months allowed in the draft ordinance.
5) The developers stated concern about the possibility that Council
may deny requests for oversize participation.
Mr. Pullen referred to 9-B.6. He clarified that the process for
oversized participation requests has reversed. Currently, the
council hears requests during the preliminary plat stage.
007365
city Council Workshop Meeting
Wednesday, July 26, 1989
Page 6
Councilman Birdwell mentioned that he has no problem with changing
the time period from six months to one year.
Agenda Item No. 8 - Discussion of code enforcement policies and
procedures pertaining to land use and structural standards (Council
Issue No. 6)
Assistant City Manager Brymer introduced this item and stated that
it was placed on the agenda in response to council issue no. 6 and
discussion held at the council retreat regarding the council's
choice of action on code enforcement (pro-active basis or a reactive
basis).
Director of Planning Callaway presented slides to illustrate his
comments. He stated that code enforcement refers to other issues
along with weeds, rubbish, and anti-neglect; such as, zoning,
structural standards, vehicle regulations, building, electrical, and
plumbing. He recognized several benefits of the code enforcement
program. Mr. Callaway listed several advantages and disadvantages
to the reactive program. He commented on the advantages and
disadvantages of the pro-active enforcement.
Mr. Callaway continued by defining the tools for code enforcement as
being 1) ordinances, and 2) staff participation, including the
Building Department staff, Zoning staff, and other departments.
He added that the code enforcement issue also relates to council
issues no. 6 and no. 7. Staff recommended several solutions,
including 1) to initiate a pro-active enforcement on areas where
codes are enforced effectively; and, 2) to select ordinances with
impact, primarily the anti-neglect ordinance, weed ordinance,
structural standards, and other land use violations that are
visible.
Mr. Callaway mentioned two ways in which code enforcement can be
accomplished. 1) Staff can continue their current approach and
change the emphasis by shifting resources and priorities.
2) Centralize the code enforcement efforts by developing a full time
position for a code enforcement officer. A decision package for
this purpose will be provided in the budget. He added that the
costs of the position could be offset by community development block
grants. Funding could be allocated by the CD Administration budget
or the Park Planning funds.
Mr. Callaway noted that the code enforcement could generate revenue
through fines and permit fees.
Councilman Haddox mentioned the response taken by the Omni Building
owners to the letter sent by the city regarding security and broken
glass at the vacant location. Mr. Haddox also mentioned that the
owner of Sunset Gardens responded to the city's letter about the
condition of his lot. He indicated that he believes the pro-active
enforcement to be the right concept.
007366
City Council Workshop Meeting
Wednesday, July 26, 1989
Page 7
Councilm~n Gardner asked if the staff has been burdened by
complaints. Mr. Callaway responded that the biggest increase in the
number of complaints relates to weeds; difficulty has transpired in
following up after the initial response; however, no emphasis has
been placed on a concentrated area.
Agenda Item No. 9 - Council Concerns.
Councilman Birdwell expressed concern about the notification process
to the owner or occupant, in relation to the "No Parking on Grass"
ordinance. City Attorney Locke noted that the ordinance was
structured from a complaint standpoint, and the notices are sent to
the owner/occupant or the person in control of the premises.
Councilman McIlhaney reported that she received a call regarding the
fire ant problem at one of the city parks. She suggested to staff
to contact the TAMU Experiment Station to find out if the city could
participate in some of their experimental programs relating to this
problem. Mrs. McIlhaney mentioned that the traffic light at Highway
30 and the East Bypass frontage road has been out of order several
times recently and the situation creates a terrible traffic
congestion problem. She also commended the Public Utilities
Department for a citizen who called expressing her appreciation for
their good attitude and service.
Councilman Haddox referred to the letter written by a citizen whose
utilities were disconnected while he was out of town and his check
did not reach the city in time for payment. Also, he asked the
Council to consider participating in the Texas A&M Cooperative
Program.
Agenda Item No. 10 - City Manager Concerns.
This item was previously discussed.
Agenda Item No. 11 - Adjourn.
The meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m.
ATTEST:
City Secr~y' Dian Jones
APPROVED:
Ma~--r ng~
GUEST REGISTER
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING
WEDNESDAY, JULY 26, 1989
4:00 P.M.
12.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
10.
20
007368