HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/03/2026 - Regular Agenda Packet - Zoning Board of Adjustments
College Station, TX
Meeting Agenda
Zoning Board of Adjustment
1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, TX 77840
Internet: www.microsoft.com/microsoft-teams/join-a-meeting
Meeting ID: 273 738 885 177 25 | Passcode: wU2iu6KW
Phone: 833-240-7855
The City Council may or may not attend this meeting.
March 3, 2026 6:00 PM Council Chambers
College Station, TX Page 1
Notice is hereby given that a quorum of the meeting body will be present in the physical location
stated above where citizens may also attend in order to view a member(s) participating by
videoconference call as allowed by 551.127, Texas Government Code. The City uses a thirdparty
vendor to host the virtual portion of the meeting; if virtual access is unavailable, meeting access
and participation will be in-person only.
1. Call meeting to order and consider absence requests.
2. Agenda Items.
2.1. Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes.
Attachments: 1. January 6, 2026
2.2. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a height variance to the
Easterwood Airport Zoning Ordinance, for the property located at Culpepper At TAMU
Subdivision Phase 2, Block 1, Lot 2, generally located at 725 University Drive (referred to as 801
Legacy Point Drive). The subject property is zoned NG-2 Transitional Northgate. Case
#AWV2025-000107
Sponsors: Jeff Howell
Attachments: 1. Staff Report
2. Small Area Map and Aerial
3. Applicants Supporting Information
4. Federal Aviation Administration Documentation
5. Applicant's Supporting Information to Federal Aviation Administration
6. TAMU System Documentation
7. Easterwood Airport Management Documentation
8. Exhibit
3. Adjourn.
Adjournment into Executive Session may occur in order to consider any item listed on the agenda if a
matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion.
I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the website and at College Station City Hall,
1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on February 23, 2026 at 5:00 p.m.
Page 1 of 53
Zoning Board of Adjustment
Page 2 March 3, 2026
City Secretary
This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting
and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters,
readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD
at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the
meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification
at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to
provide the necessary accommodations.
Page 2 of 53
January 6, 2026 Zoning Board of Adjustments Minutes Page 1 of 3
Minutes
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Regular Meeting
January 6, 2026
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Bill Lartigue, Justin Collins, Michael Martinez, and
James Hutchins
MEMBERS ABSENT: Jaymeson Hacker
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Assistant Director of Planning & Development Services Molly
Hitchcock, Staff Planner Gabriel Schrum, Assistant City Attorney David Purnell, Technology
Service Specialist Lillian Wells, Administrative Support Specialist Kristen Hejny, and Staff
Assistant Jocelyne Mora.
1. Call meeting to order.
Chairperson Lartigue called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
2. Agenda Items
2.1. Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes:
• October 7, 2025
Board Member Collins moved to approve the meeting minutes from October 7, 2025,
Board Member Martinez seconded the motion, the motion passed 4-0.
2.2. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding variance to the
maximum size of accessory structures per the Unified Development Ordinance Section
6.5.B.1 ‘Accessory Structures,’ for the property located at Woodland Acres, Lot 6 (Front
419’ of), Acres 1.4445, generally located at 904 Ashburn Avenue. The property is zoned
GS General Suburban. Case #AWV2025-000091.
Staff Planner Schrum presented the item to the Board and stated that the applicant is
requesting an increase in accessory structure size to go beyond the allowed 25% of the
principal structure maximum allowance for a proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU).
Staff recommended denial of the request due to the fact that it does not meet the
specified criteria. Specifically:
1. There are no extraordinary conditions affecting the land depriving the
owner of its use.
2. The granting of the variance is not necessary for the enjoyment of a
substantial property right.
Page 3 of 53
January 6, 2026 Zoning Board of Adjustments Minutes Page 2 of 3
3. The conditions generally apply to other property in the vicinity.
4. The hardship is a result of the applicant’s own actions.
5. That because of these conditions, the application of the UDO would not
effectively prohibit or unreasonably restrict the utilization of the property.
Chairperson Lartigue opened the public hearing.
Brandon Spears, Applicant, presented to the Board and was available for questions.
Board Member Hutchins asked if the applicant were to build onto their home, would
this allow them to build a bigger accessory dwelling unit.
Staff Planner Schrum confirmed that a remodel of the main structure would increase
the 25% accessory dwelling unit allowance based on the new square footage of the
home.
Board Member Hutchins asked if the applicant could construct an attached garage
similar to neighboring properties.
Board Member Collins seconded clarification on if the properties that were mentioned
in the applicant’s presentation were considered garages and not accessory dwelling
units.
Staff Planner Schrum confirmed that the other properties presented were all if not the
majority permitted and used as detached garages, even though some have existing
living spaces in them. The 25% principal structure maximum allowance is looked at
for an accessory dwelling unit utilization.
Board Member Martinez asked for confirmation is it being considered an accessory
dwelling unit is because it would occupied.
Staff Planner Schrum confirmed that permitting is based on its use as an accessory
dwelling unit. All residential building plans are looked over when they come in for
review.
Board Member Martinez and Board Member Hutchins asked if there are any cases
where staff allow accessory dwelling units permitted over the 25% principal structure
max allowance. If so, was this option given to the applicant.
Staff Planner Schrum confirmed staff does offer a mix of adjustments. A 10%
administrative adjustment to the 25% maximum allowance can be requested but
anything beyond that is the purview of the Zoning Board of Adjustment. The
administrative adjustment is always an option but was not necessarily presented due
to the square footage of the proposed accessory dwelling unit far exceeding the limits
of the administrative adjustment.
Page 4 of 53
January 6, 2026 Zoning Board of Adjustments Minutes Page 3 of 3
Mary Wells, 1106 Ashburn Avenue, College Station, spoke in favor of the variance.
Chairperson Lartigue closed the public hearing.
Board Member Martinez stated that the Board must uphold Unified Development
Ordinance (UDO) standards.
Board Member Hutchins asked what is being affected, what happens to the UDO down the
line, and what happens to the property in 20 years.
Board Member Martinez requested recommendations from staff on what could be possibly
proposed as conditions.
Assistant City Attorney David Purnell explained that this meeting is the proper legal forum
to decide whether to grant a variance. He noted that the additional 10% beyond the allowed
25% would be considered an administrative adjustment and is within the administrator’s
discretion. Staff must follow the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) adopted by the
democratically elected governing body and adhere to the established procedures. Under
Chapter 211 of the Texas Local Government Code, the Board must determine whether
granting a variance would preserve the spirit and intent of the zoning regulations. If the
applicant meets all required criteria, the Board may grant the variance.
Board Member Martines asked Assistant City Attorney David Purnell if this was either a
yes or no type of circumstance.
Assistant City Attorney David Purnell confirmed.
Board Member Collins stated that the variance does not meet the necessary nine criteria.
Board Member Martinez agreed that the variance does not meet the necessary nine criteria.
Board Member Collins motioned to deny the variance as it does not meet the
necessary nine criteria, Board Member Hutchinson seconded the motion, the motion
to deny passed 4-0.
3. Adjourn.
The meeting adjourned at 6:40 p.m.
Approved: Attest:
______________________________ ________________________________
Bill Lartigue, Chairperson Jocelyne Mora, Board Secretary
Page 5 of 53
Airport Zoning Board of Adjustment
March 3, 2026
Page 1 of 3
AIRPORT ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
AIRPORT HEIGHT VARIANCE REQUEST
FOR
725 University Drive
(referred to as 801 Legacy Point Drive)
AWV2025-000107
REQUEST: Height variance to the Easterwood Airport Zoning Ordinance
LOCATION: 725 University Drive (referred to as 801 Legacy Point Drive)
Culpepper at TAMU Subdivision Phase 2, Block 1, Lot 2
ZONING: NG-2 Transitional Northgate
PROPERTY OWNER: Culpepper Family LP
APPLICANT: Kimley-Horn
PROJECT MANAGER: Jeff Howell, Senior Planner
jhowell@cstx.gov
RECOMMENDATION: Approval
BACKGROUND: The applicant is proposing a new student high rise development in Northgate
encompassing one lot at the corner of Legacy Point Drive and Church Avenue.
The building is anticipated to have commercial use, lobby and residential
amenities with parking on the ground floor, along with a parking garage and
residential units above similar to the character of other developments in the
area. The structure is anticipated to be 25 stories in height, and the tallest
corner will sit at 620’-8” Above Mean Sea Level (AMSL) or 282’-8” Above
Ground Level (AGL). Per the Airport Zoning Ordinance for the Easterwood
Airport, the maximum height limitation for this site is 520.6’ AMSL. The
applicant is requesting a height variance for the building, any tolerances during
construction or any additional rooftop equipment such as the FAA light of
approximately 117.4’ (638’ AMSL/300’ AGL).
Page 6 of 53
Airport Zoning Board of Adjustment
March 3, 2026
Page 2 of 3
ORDINANCE INTENT: The purpose of the Airport Zoning Ordinance is to establish clear and
unambiguous regulations for the protection of the lives and property of users,
owners, and occupants of and in the vicinity of Easterwood Field Airport and for
the protection of airport operations.
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Board Hearing Date: March 3, 2026
Property owner notices mailed: 12
Contacts in support: None at time of staff report
Contacts in opposition: None at time of staff report
Inquiry contacts: None at time of staff report
ZONING AND LAND USES
Direction Zoning Land Use
North NG-2 Transitional Northgate Parking lot
East NG-2 Transitional Northgate Restaurant, University Drive (Right-of-Way)
South NG-2 Transitional Northgate Legacy Point Drive (Right-of-Way)
West NG-2 Transitional Northgate Multifamily, Legacy Point Drive (Right-of-
Way)
REVIEW CRITERIA
According to the Texas Local Government Code Section 241.034 Variances, the Board shall allow a variance
from an airport zoning regulation if all of the following criteria are met:
1. A literal application or enforcement of the regulation would result in practical difficulty
or unnecessary hardship.
2. The granting of the relief would result in substantial justice being done.
3. The granting of the relief would not be contrary to the public interest.
4. The granting of the relief would be in accordance with the spirit of the regulation.
The board may impose any reasonable conditions on the variance that it considers necessary to accomplish
the purpose of airport zoning.
The variance request is to allow for an increase in maximum height for a new proposed mixed-use structure.
The height variance request of 117.4-feet for the building structure will allow for the height of the building,
building tolerances that may change during construction and any additional rooftop equipment (such as the
FAA light) that is needed to develop the newly proposed mixed-use structure. The overall building height will sit
at a maximum of 620’-8” Above Mean Sea Level or 282’-8” Above Ground Level.
Page 7 of 53
Airport Zoning Board of Adjustment
March 3, 2026
Page 3 of 3
The FAA has made the determination that No Hazard to Air Navigation is present for the building (638 AMSL/300’
AGL). In consultation with the EAM team, the TAMU System has no objections to the granting of a variance for
the building.
Allowing the height encroachment for building would result in substantial justice being done. The relief would
not be contrary to the public interest as it has been deemed acceptable by the FAA, Easterwood Airport and the
TAMU System with additional safety precautions and communication processes between the applicant and
airport required. The relief would be in accordance with the spirit of the regulation to allow development while
protecting lives, property, and airport operations.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
After reviewing the request and the related criteria, the information provided by the FAA, EAM and TAMUS,
staff recommends approval of the request. The granting of the variance would result in substantial justice
being done without being contrary to the public interest, and the spirit of the regulation remains.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Small Area Map and Aerial
2. Applicant’s Supporting Information
3. Federal Aviation Administration Documentation
4. Applicant's Supporting Information to Federal Aviation Administration
5. Easterwood Airport Management Documentation
6. TAMU System Documentation
7. Exhibit
Page 8 of 53
Page 9 of 53
Page 10 of 53
Name of Project: CULPEPPER PHASE 2-HEIGHT VARIANCE (BUILDING ONLY) (AWV2025-000107)
Address: 725 UNIVERSITY DR
Legal Description: A005001, J E SCOTT (ICL), TRACT 100, 0.1763 ACRES, PT OF UNIVERSITY SQUARE
Applicant: Kimley-Horn
Property Owner: CULPEPPER FAMILY LP
Applicable ordinance section being appealed/seeking waiver from:
Easterwood Field Airport Zoning Ordinance
The following specific variation to the ordinance is requested:
The proposed structure will exceed the airport height zoning limit. The request is 300’ to match FAA height,
however the building will be 282’8” as coordinated with the NRA documents. This request allows for
appurtenances such as the FAA light and building tolerances.
The unnecessary hardship(s) involved by meeting the provisions of the ordinance other than financial
hardship is/are:
Compliance would result in not being able to meet the minimum parking requirements and still be financially
feasible.
The following alternatives to the requested variance are possible:
Without this variance developing this site is not financially feasible.
APPEAL/WAIVER APPLICATION
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
The variance will not be contrary to public interest due to:
This variance allows for more quality student housing in very close proximity to campus. This project is part of a
3-phase project that will ultimately connect the North-gate district with Century Square which will ultimately
strengthen the overall College Station economy. Additionally, this project is making provisions to allow for a
potential future pedestrian underpass connecting North Gate and TAMU campus.
The following special condition exists:
The irregular parcel shape forces an inefficient parking layout which requires additional levels of parking to
meet code minimums.
Page 1 of 1
Page 11 of 53
Mail Processing Center
Federal Aviation Administration
Southwest Regional Office
Obstruction Evaluation Group
10101 Hillwood Parkway
Fort Worth, TX 76177
Aeronautical Study No.
2025-ASW-5520-OE
Page 1 of 8
Issued Date: 08/07/2025
LV COLLECTIVE
MAURICIO VISBAL
801 Congress Ave
Suite 200
Austin, TX 78701
** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION **
The Federal Aviation Administration has conducted an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C.,
Section 44718 and if applicable Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 77, concerning:
Structure:Building North Extent of Building
County, State:Brazos, Texas
Collected Point(s):
Label Latitude Longitude SE DET AGL AMSL
North Extent of Building 30-37-21.61N 96-20-34.86W 338 Ft 300 Ft 638 Ft
This aeronautical study revealed that the structure would have no substantial adverse effect on the safe
and efficient utilization of the navigable airspace by aircraft or on the operation of air navigation facilities.
Therefore, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, it is hereby determined that the structure would not be a
hazard to air navigation provided the following condition(s) is(are) met:
As a condition to this Determination, the structure is to be marked/lighted in accordance with FAA Advisory
circular 70/7460-1 M Change 1, Obstruction Marking and Lighting, red lights-Chapters 4,5(Red),&15.
Any failure or malfunction that lasts more than thirty (30) minutes and affects a top light or flashing obstruction
light, regardless of its position, should be reported immediately to (877) 487-6867 so a Notice to Airmen
(NOTAM) can be issued. As soon as the normal operation is restored, notify the same number.
It is required that FAA Form 7460-2, Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, be e-filed any time the
project is abandoned or:
_____ At least 10 days prior to start of construction (7460-2, Part 1)
__X__ Within 5 days after the construction reaches its greatest height (7460-2, Part 2)
See attachment for additional condition(s) or information.
This determination expires on 02/07/2027 unless:
Page 12 of 53
Page 2 of 8
(a)the construction is started (not necessarily completed) and FAA Form 7460-2, Notice of Actual
Construction or Alteration, is received by this office.
(b)extended, revised, or terminated by the issuing office.
(c)the construction is subject to the licensing authority of the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) and an application for a construction permit has been filed, as required by the FCC, within
6 months of the date of this determination. In such case, the determination expires on the date
prescribed by the FCC for completion of construction, or the date the FCC denies the application.
NOTE: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THIS DETERMINATION MUST
BE E-FILED AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE. AFTER RE-EVALUATION
OF CURRENT OPERATIONS IN THE AREA OF THE STRUCTURE TO DETERMINE THAT NO
SIGNIFICANT AERONAUTICAL CHANGES HAVE OCCURRED, YOUR DETERMINATION MAY BE
ELIGIBLE FOR ONE EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD.
This determination is subject to review if an interested party files a petition that is received by the FAA on or
before September 06, 2025. In the event an interested party files a petition for review, it must contain a full
statement of the basis upon which the petition is made. Petitions can be submitted to the Manager, Rules and
Regulations Group via email at OEPetitions@faa.gov, or via mail to Federal Aviation Administration, Air
Traffic Organization, Rules and Regulations Group, 5th floor, 600 Independence Ave, SW., Washington, DC
20597. FAA encourages the use of email to ensure timely processing.
This determination becomes final on September 16, 2025 unless a petition is timely filed. In which case, this
determination will not become final pending disposition of the petition. Interested parties will be notified of the
grant of any review. Any questions regarding your petition, contact Rules and Regulations Group via telephone
(202) 267-8783.
This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates, heights,
frequency(ies) and power. Any changes in coordinates, heights and frequencies or use of greater power, except
those frequencies specified in the Colo Void Clause Coalition; Antenna System Co-Location; Voluntary Best
Practices, will void this determination. Any future construction or alteration, including increase to heights,
power or the addition of other transmitters, requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination includes all
previously filed frequencies and power for this structure.
If construction or alteration is dismantled or destroyed, you must submit notice to the FAA within 5 days after
the construction or alteration is dismantled or destroyed.
This determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes, derricks, etc., which may be
used during actual construction of the structure. However, this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as
indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the
FAA.
This determination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace
by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or
regulation of any Federal, State, or local government body.
This aeronautical study considered and analyzed the impact on existing and proposed arrival, departure, and
en route procedures for aircraft operating under both visual flight rules and instrument flight rules; the impact
on all existing and planned public-use airports, military airports and aeronautical facilities; and the cumulative
impact resulting from the studied structure when combined with the impact of other existing or proposed
Page 13 of 53
Page 3 of 8
structures. The study disclosed that the described structure would have no substantial adverse effect on air
navigation.
An account of the study findings, aeronautical objections received by the FAA during the study (if any), and the
basis for the FAA's decision in this matter can be found on the following page(s).
If we can be of further assistance, please contact andrew.hollie@faa.gov, at 1-817-222-5933, or
andrew.hollie@faa.gov. On any future correspondence concerning this matter, please refer to Aeronautical
Study Number 2025-ASW-5520-OE.
Signature Control No: 656344182-672799783 ( DNH )
Julie A. Morgan
Manager, Obstruction Evaluation Group
Attachment(s)
Additional Information
Case Description
Map(s)
Page 14 of 53
Page 4 of 8
Additional information for ASN 2025-ASW-5520-OE
Abbreviations
AGL = Above Ground Level
MSL = Mean Sea Level
NM = Nautical Mile
RWY = Runway
NEH = No Effect Height
Part 77 = Title 14 CFR Part 77, Safe, Efficient Use and Preservation of the Navigable Airspace
Our study has disclosed that this proposed building project is composed of four studies that represent the
corners of the building, located approximately 2.26 nm northeast of the airport reference point, is within the
protected surfaces at Easterwood Field (CLL), College Station, TX.
The four studies are:
Aeronautical Study AGL / MSL Direct distance from runway end 16
2025-ASW-5520-OE 300 / 638 11340 feet / 1.86 nm
2025-ASW-5521-OE 300 / 633 11245 feet / 1.85 nm
2025-ASW-5522-OE 300 / 633 11123 feet / 1.83 nm
2025-ASW-5523-OE 300 / 637 11281 feet / 1.85 nm
Aeronautical study number 2025-ASW-5522-OE is being circulated for public comment as the closest point
with the greatest impact. All comments for this study will be a comment on the project.
At the proposed height, this structure will penetrate these protected airport surfaces:
> 77.17 (a)(2) A height that is 200 feet AGL, or above the established airport elevation, whichever is higher,
within 3 nautical miles of the established reference point of an airport with its longest runway more than 3,200
feet in actual length, and that height increases in the proportion of 100 feet for each additional nautical mile
from the airport up to a maximum of 499 feet.
2025-ASW-5520-OE exceeds by 100 feet.
2025-ASW-5521-OE exceeds by 100 feet.
2025-ASW-5522-OE exceeds by 100 feet.
2025-ASW-5523-OE exceeds by 100 feet.
> 77.17 (a)(5) The surface of a takeoff and landing area of an airport or any imaginary surface established under
77.19, 77.21, or 77.23.
77.19 (b) Conical surface. A surface extending outward and upward from the periphery of the horizontal surface
at a slope of 20 to 1 for a horizontal distance of 4,000 feet.
2025-ASW-5520-OE exceeds by 108 feet.
2025-ASW-5521-OE exceeds by 107 feet.
2025-ASW-5522-OE exceeds by 114 feet.
2025-ASW-5523-OE exceeds by 110 feet.
Page 15 of 53
Page 5 of 8
**Part 77 obstruction standards are used to screen the many proposals submitted in order to identify those
which warrant further aeronautical study. This study is conducted in order to determine if the proposal would
have a significant adverse effect on protected aeronautical operations and airspace. While part 77 obstruction
standards trigger formal aeronautical study, including public circularization, these obstruction standards do
not constitute absolute or arbitrary criteria for identification of hazards to air navigation. Accordingly, the fact
that a proposed structure exceeds certain obstruction standards of part 77 is in itself not sufficient grounds for
issuance of a determination of hazard to air navigation.
The proposal was circularized for public comment on 06/25/2025 to 4961 email respondents with no response
returned.
AERONAUTICAL STUDY FOR POSSIBLE INSTRUMENT FLIGHT RULES (IFR) EFFECT DISCLOSED
THE FOLLOWING:
> The proposed structure would have no effect on any existing or proposed IFR arrival/departure routes,
operations, or procedures.
> The proposed structure would have no effect on any existing or proposed IFR en route routes, operations, or
procedures.
> The proposed structure would have no effect on any existing or proposed IFR minimum flight altitudes.
AERONAUTICAL STUDY FOR POSSIBLE VISUAL FLIGHT RULES (VFR) EFFECT DISCLOSED THE
FOLLOWING:
> The proposed structure would have no effect on any existing or proposed VFR arrival or departure routes,
operations or procedures.
> The proposed structure would not conflict with airspace required to conduct normal VFR traffic pattern
operations at any known public use or military airports.
> The proposed structure would not penetrate those altitudes normally considered available to airmen for VFR
en route flight.
The cumulative impact of the proposed structure, when combined with other existing structures is not
considered significant. Study did not disclose any adverse effect on existing or proposed public-use or military
airports or navigational facilities. Nor would the proposal affect the capacity of any known existing or planned
public-use or military airport.
Therefore, it is determined that the proposed construction would not have a substantial adverse effect on the
safe and efficient utilization of the navigable airspace by aircraft or on any air navigation facility and would not
be a hazard to air navigation.
Page 16 of 53
Page 6 of 8
Case Description for ASN 2025-ASW-5520-OE
Filing proposed building development project and temporary cranes; College Station, TX.
Page 17 of 53
Page 7 of 8
TOPO Map for ASN 2025-ASW-5520-OE
Page 18 of 53
Page 8 of 8
Sectional Map for ASN 2025-ASW-5520-OE
Page 19 of 53
Mail Processing Center
Federal Aviation Administration
Southwest Regional Office
Obstruction Evaluation Group
10101 Hillwood Parkway
Fort Worth, TX 76177
Aeronautical Study No.
2025-ASW-5521-OE
Page 1 of 8
Issued Date: 08/07/2025
LV COLLECTIVE
MAURICIO VISBAL
801 Congress Ave
Suite 200
Austin, TX 78701
** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION **
The Federal Aviation Administration has conducted an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C.,
Section 44718 and if applicable Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 77, concerning:
Structure:Building East Extent of Building
County, State:Brazos, Texas
Collected Point(s):
Label Latitude Longitude SE DET AGL AMSL
East Extent of Building 30-37-19.08N 96-20-32.48W 333 Ft 300 Ft 633 Ft
This aeronautical study revealed that the structure would have no substantial adverse effect on the safe
and efficient utilization of the navigable airspace by aircraft or on the operation of air navigation facilities.
Therefore, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, it is hereby determined that the structure would not be a
hazard to air navigation provided the following condition(s) is(are) met:
As a condition to this Determination, the structure is to be marked/lighted in accordance with FAA Advisory
circular 70/7460-1 M Change 1, Obstruction Marking and Lighting, red lights-Chapters 4,5(Red),&15.
Any failure or malfunction that lasts more than thirty (30) minutes and affects a top light or flashing obstruction
light, regardless of its position, should be reported immediately to (877) 487-6867 so a Notice to Airmen
(NOTAM) can be issued. As soon as the normal operation is restored, notify the same number.
It is required that FAA Form 7460-2, Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, be e-filed any time the
project is abandoned or:
_____ At least 10 days prior to start of construction (7460-2, Part 1)
__X__ Within 5 days after the construction reaches its greatest height (7460-2, Part 2)
See attachment for additional condition(s) or information.
This determination expires on 02/07/2027 unless:
Page 20 of 53
Page 2 of 8
(a)the construction is started (not necessarily completed) and FAA Form 7460-2, Notice of Actual
Construction or Alteration, is received by this office.
(b)extended, revised, or terminated by the issuing office.
(c)the construction is subject to the licensing authority of the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) and an application for a construction permit has been filed, as required by the FCC, within
6 months of the date of this determination. In such case, the determination expires on the date
prescribed by the FCC for completion of construction, or the date the FCC denies the application.
NOTE: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THIS DETERMINATION MUST
BE E-FILED AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE. AFTER RE-EVALUATION
OF CURRENT OPERATIONS IN THE AREA OF THE STRUCTURE TO DETERMINE THAT NO
SIGNIFICANT AERONAUTICAL CHANGES HAVE OCCURRED, YOUR DETERMINATION MAY BE
ELIGIBLE FOR ONE EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD.
This determination is subject to review if an interested party files a petition that is received by the FAA on or
before September 06, 2025. In the event an interested party files a petition for review, it must contain a full
statement of the basis upon which the petition is made. Petitions can be submitted to the Manager, Rules and
Regulations Group via email at OEPetitions@faa.gov, or via mail to Federal Aviation Administration, Air
Traffic Organization, Rules and Regulations Group, 5th floor, 600 Independence Ave, SW., Washington, DC
20597. FAA encourages the use of email to ensure timely processing.
This determination becomes final on September 16, 2025 unless a petition is timely filed. In which case, this
determination will not become final pending disposition of the petition. Interested parties will be notified of the
grant of any review. Any questions regarding your petition, contact Rules and Regulations Group via telephone
(202) 267-8783.
This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates, heights,
frequency(ies) and power. Any changes in coordinates, heights and frequencies or use of greater power, except
those frequencies specified in the Colo Void Clause Coalition; Antenna System Co-Location; Voluntary Best
Practices, will void this determination. Any future construction or alteration, including increase to heights,
power or the addition of other transmitters, requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination includes all
previously filed frequencies and power for this structure.
If construction or alteration is dismantled or destroyed, you must submit notice to the FAA within 5 days after
the construction or alteration is dismantled or destroyed.
This determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes, derricks, etc., which may be
used during actual construction of the structure. However, this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as
indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the
FAA.
This determination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace
by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or
regulation of any Federal, State, or local government body.
This aeronautical study considered and analyzed the impact on existing and proposed arrival, departure, and
en route procedures for aircraft operating under both visual flight rules and instrument flight rules; the impact
on all existing and planned public-use airports, military airports and aeronautical facilities; and the cumulative
impact resulting from the studied structure when combined with the impact of other existing or proposed
Page 21 of 53
Page 3 of 8
structures. The study disclosed that the described structure would have no substantial adverse effect on air
navigation.
An account of the study findings, aeronautical objections received by the FAA during the study (if any), and the
basis for the FAA's decision in this matter can be found on the following page(s).
If we can be of further assistance, please contact andrew.hollie@faa.gov, at 1-817-222-5933, or
andrew.hollie@faa.gov. On any future correspondence concerning this matter, please refer to Aeronautical
Study Number 2025-ASW-5521-OE.
Signature Control No: 656344183-672799786 ( DNH )
Julie A. Morgan
Manager, Obstruction Evaluation Group
Attachment(s)
Additional Information
Case Description
Map(s)
Page 22 of 53
Page 4 of 8
Additional information for ASN 2025-ASW-5521-OE
Abbreviations
AGL = Above Ground Level
MSL = Mean Sea Level
NM = Nautical Mile
RWY = Runway
NEH = No Effect Height
Part 77 = Title 14 CFR Part 77, Safe, Efficient Use and Preservation of the Navigable Airspace
Our study has disclosed that this proposed building project is composed of four studies that represent the
corners of the building, located approximately 2.26 nm northeast of the airport reference point, is within the
protected surfaces at Easterwood Field (CLL), College Station, TX.
The four studies are:
Aeronautical Study AGL / MSL Direct distance from runway end 16
2025-ASW-5520-OE 300 / 638 11340 feet / 1.86 nm
2025-ASW-5521-OE 300 / 633 11245 feet / 1.85 nm
2025-ASW-5522-OE 300 / 633 11123 feet / 1.83 nm
2025-ASW-5523-OE 300 / 637 11281 feet / 1.85 nm
Aeronautical study number 2025-ASW-5522-OE is being circulated for public comment as the closest point
with the greatest impact. All comments for this study will be a comment on the project.
At the proposed height, this structure will penetrate these protected airport surfaces:
> 77.17 (a)(2) A height that is 200 feet AGL, or above the established airport elevation, whichever is higher,
within 3 nautical miles of the established reference point of an airport with its longest runway more than 3,200
feet in actual length, and that height increases in the proportion of 100 feet for each additional nautical mile
from the airport up to a maximum of 499 feet.
2025-ASW-5520-OE exceeds by 100 feet.
2025-ASW-5521-OE exceeds by 100 feet.
2025-ASW-5522-OE exceeds by 100 feet.
2025-ASW-5523-OE exceeds by 100 feet.
> 77.17 (a)(5) The surface of a takeoff and landing area of an airport or any imaginary surface established under
77.19, 77.21, or 77.23.
77.19 (b) Conical surface. A surface extending outward and upward from the periphery of the horizontal surface
at a slope of 20 to 1 for a horizontal distance of 4,000 feet.
2025-ASW-5520-OE exceeds by 108 feet.
2025-ASW-5521-OE exceeds by 107 feet.
2025-ASW-5522-OE exceeds by 114 feet.
2025-ASW-5523-OE exceeds by 110 feet.
Page 23 of 53
Page 5 of 8
**Part 77 obstruction standards are used to screen the many proposals submitted in order to identify those
which warrant further aeronautical study. This study is conducted in order to determine if the proposal would
have a significant adverse effect on protected aeronautical operations and airspace. While part 77 obstruction
standards trigger formal aeronautical study, including public circularization, these obstruction standards do
not constitute absolute or arbitrary criteria for identification of hazards to air navigation. Accordingly, the fact
that a proposed structure exceeds certain obstruction standards of part 77 is in itself not sufficient grounds for
issuance of a determination of hazard to air navigation.
The proposal was circularized for public comment on 06/25/2025 to 4961 email respondents with no response
returned.
AERONAUTICAL STUDY FOR POSSIBLE INSTRUMENT FLIGHT RULES (IFR) EFFECT DISCLOSED
THE FOLLOWING:
> The proposed structure would have no effect on any existing or proposed IFR arrival/departure routes,
operations, or procedures.
> The proposed structure would have no effect on any existing or proposed IFR en route routes, operations, or
procedures.
> The proposed structure would have no effect on any existing or proposed IFR minimum flight altitudes.
AERONAUTICAL STUDY FOR POSSIBLE VISUAL FLIGHT RULES (VFR) EFFECT DISCLOSED THE
FOLLOWING:
> The proposed structure would have no effect on any existing or proposed VFR arrival or departure routes,
operations or procedures.
> The proposed structure would not conflict with airspace required to conduct normal VFR traffic pattern
operations at any known public use or military airports.
> The proposed structure would not penetrate those altitudes normally considered available to airmen for VFR
en route flight.
The cumulative impact of the proposed structure, when combined with other existing structures is not
considered significant. Study did not disclose any adverse effect on existing or proposed public-use or military
airports or navigational facilities. Nor would the proposal affect the capacity of any known existing or planned
public-use or military airport.
Therefore, it is determined that the proposed construction would not have a substantial adverse effect on the
safe and efficient utilization of the navigable airspace by aircraft or on any air navigation facility and would not
be a hazard to air navigation.
Page 24 of 53
Page 6 of 8
Case Description for ASN 2025-ASW-5521-OE
Filing proposed building development project and temporary cranes; College Station, TX.
Page 25 of 53
Page 7 of 8
TOPO Map for ASN 2025-ASW-5521-OE
Page 26 of 53
Page 8 of 8
Sectional Map for ASN 2025-ASW-5521-OE
Page 27 of 53
Mail Processing Center
Federal Aviation Administration
Southwest Regional Office
Obstruction Evaluation Group
10101 Hillwood Parkway
Fort Worth, TX 76177
Aeronautical Study No.
2025-ASW-5522-OE
Page 1 of 8
Issued Date: 08/07/2025
LV COLLECTIVE
MAURICIO VISBAL
801 Congress Ave
Suite 200
Austin, TX 78701
** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION **
The Federal Aviation Administration has conducted an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C.,
Section 44718 and if applicable Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 77, concerning:
Structure:Building South Extent of Building
County, State:Brazos, Texas
Collected Point(s):
Label Latitude Longitude SE DET AGL AMSL
South Extent of Building 30-37-18.20N 96-20-33.47W 333 Ft 300 Ft 633 Ft
This aeronautical study revealed that the structure would have no substantial adverse effect on the safe
and efficient utilization of the navigable airspace by aircraft or on the operation of air navigation facilities.
Therefore, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, it is hereby determined that the structure would not be a
hazard to air navigation provided the following condition(s) is(are) met:
As a condition to this Determination, the structure is to be marked/lighted in accordance with FAA Advisory
circular 70/7460-1 M Change 1, Obstruction Marking and Lighting, red lights-Chapters 4,5(Red),&15.
Any failure or malfunction that lasts more than thirty (30) minutes and affects a top light or flashing obstruction
light, regardless of its position, should be reported immediately to (877) 487-6867 so a Notice to Airmen
(NOTAM) can be issued. As soon as the normal operation is restored, notify the same number.
It is required that FAA Form 7460-2, Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, be e-filed any time the
project is abandoned or:
_____ At least 10 days prior to start of construction (7460-2, Part 1)
__X__ Within 5 days after the construction reaches its greatest height (7460-2, Part 2)
See attachment for additional condition(s) or information.
This determination expires on 02/07/2027 unless:
Page 28 of 53
Page 2 of 8
(a)the construction is started (not necessarily completed) and FAA Form 7460-2, Notice of Actual
Construction or Alteration, is received by this office.
(b)extended, revised, or terminated by the issuing office.
(c)the construction is subject to the licensing authority of the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) and an application for a construction permit has been filed, as required by the FCC, within
6 months of the date of this determination. In such case, the determination expires on the date
prescribed by the FCC for completion of construction, or the date the FCC denies the application.
NOTE: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THIS DETERMINATION MUST
BE E-FILED AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE. AFTER RE-EVALUATION
OF CURRENT OPERATIONS IN THE AREA OF THE STRUCTURE TO DETERMINE THAT NO
SIGNIFICANT AERONAUTICAL CHANGES HAVE OCCURRED, YOUR DETERMINATION MAY BE
ELIGIBLE FOR ONE EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD.
This determination is subject to review if an interested party files a petition that is received by the FAA on or
before September 06, 2025. In the event an interested party files a petition for review, it must contain a full
statement of the basis upon which the petition is made. Petitions can be submitted to the Manager, Rules and
Regulations Group via email at OEPetitions@faa.gov, or via mail to Federal Aviation Administration, Air
Traffic Organization, Rules and Regulations Group, 5th floor, 600 Independence Ave, SW., Washington, DC
20597. FAA encourages the use of email to ensure timely processing.
This determination becomes final on September 16, 2025 unless a petition is timely filed. In which case, this
determination will not become final pending disposition of the petition. Interested parties will be notified of the
grant of any review. Any questions regarding your petition, contact Rules and Regulations Group via telephone
(202) 267-8783.
This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates, heights,
frequency(ies) and power. Any changes in coordinates, heights and frequencies or use of greater power, except
those frequencies specified in the Colo Void Clause Coalition; Antenna System Co-Location; Voluntary Best
Practices, will void this determination. Any future construction or alteration, including increase to heights,
power or the addition of other transmitters, requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination includes all
previously filed frequencies and power for this structure.
If construction or alteration is dismantled or destroyed, you must submit notice to the FAA within 5 days after
the construction or alteration is dismantled or destroyed.
This determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes, derricks, etc., which may be
used during actual construction of the structure. However, this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as
indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the
FAA.
This determination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace
by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or
regulation of any Federal, State, or local government body.
This aeronautical study considered and analyzed the impact on existing and proposed arrival, departure, and
en route procedures for aircraft operating under both visual flight rules and instrument flight rules; the impact
on all existing and planned public-use airports, military airports and aeronautical facilities; and the cumulative
impact resulting from the studied structure when combined with the impact of other existing or proposed
Page 29 of 53
Page 3 of 8
structures. The study disclosed that the described structure would have no substantial adverse effect on air
navigation.
An account of the study findings, aeronautical objections received by the FAA during the study (if any), and the
basis for the FAA's decision in this matter can be found on the following page(s).
If we can be of further assistance, please contact andrew.hollie@faa.gov, at 1-817-222-5933, or
andrew.hollie@faa.gov. On any future correspondence concerning this matter, please refer to Aeronautical
Study Number 2025-ASW-5522-OE.
Signature Control No: 656344184-672799784 ( DNH )
Julie A. Morgan
Manager, Obstruction Evaluation Group
Attachment(s)
Additional Information
Case Description
Map(s)
Page 30 of 53
Page 4 of 8
Additional information for ASN 2025-ASW-5522-OE
Abbreviations
AGL = Above Ground Level
MSL = Mean Sea Level
NM = Nautical Mile
RWY = Runway
NEH = No Effect Height
Part 77 = Title 14 CFR Part 77, Safe, Efficient Use and Preservation of the Navigable Airspace
Our study has disclosed that this proposed building project is composed of four studies that represent the
corners of the building, located approximately 2.26 nm northeast of the airport reference point, is within the
protected surfaces at Easterwood Field (CLL), College Station, TX.
The four studies are:
Aeronautical Study AGL / MSL Direct distance from runway end 16
2025-ASW-5520-OE 300 / 638 11340 feet / 1.86 nm
2025-ASW-5521-OE 300 / 633 11245 feet / 1.85 nm
2025-ASW-5522-OE 300 / 633 11123 feet / 1.83 nm
2025-ASW-5523-OE 300 / 637 11281 feet / 1.85 nm
Aeronautical study number 2025-ASW-5522-OE is being circulated for public comment as the closest point
with the greatest impact. All comments for this study will be a comment on the project.
At the proposed height, this structure will penetrate these protected airport surfaces:
> 77.17 (a)(2) A height that is 200 feet AGL, or above the established airport elevation, whichever is higher,
within 3 nautical miles of the established reference point of an airport with its longest runway more than 3,200
feet in actual length, and that height increases in the proportion of 100 feet for each additional nautical mile
from the airport up to a maximum of 499 feet.
2025-ASW-5520-OE exceeds by 100 feet.
2025-ASW-5521-OE exceeds by 100 feet.
2025-ASW-5522-OE exceeds by 100 feet.
2025-ASW-5523-OE exceeds by 100 feet.
> 77.17 (a)(5) The surface of a takeoff and landing area of an airport or any imaginary surface established under
77.19, 77.21, or 77.23.
77.19 (b) Conical surface. A surface extending outward and upward from the periphery of the horizontal surface
at a slope of 20 to 1 for a horizontal distance of 4,000 feet.
2025-ASW-5520-OE exceeds by 108 feet.
2025-ASW-5521-OE exceeds by 107 feet.
2025-ASW-5522-OE exceeds by 114 feet.
2025-ASW-5523-OE exceeds by 110 feet.
Page 31 of 53
Page 5 of 8
**Part 77 obstruction standards are used to screen the many proposals submitted in order to identify those
which warrant further aeronautical study. This study is conducted in order to determine if the proposal would
have a significant adverse effect on protected aeronautical operations and airspace. While part 77 obstruction
standards trigger formal aeronautical study, including public circularization, these obstruction standards do
not constitute absolute or arbitrary criteria for identification of hazards to air navigation. Accordingly, the fact
that a proposed structure exceeds certain obstruction standards of part 77 is in itself not sufficient grounds for
issuance of a determination of hazard to air navigation.
The proposal was circularized for public comment on 06/25/2025 to 4961 email respondents with no response
returned.
AERONAUTICAL STUDY FOR POSSIBLE INSTRUMENT FLIGHT RULES (IFR) EFFECT DISCLOSED
THE FOLLOWING:
> The proposed structure would have no effect on any existing or proposed IFR arrival/departure routes,
operations, or procedures.
> The proposed structure would have no effect on any existing or proposed IFR en route routes, operations, or
procedures.
> The proposed structure would have no effect on any existing or proposed IFR minimum flight altitudes.
AERONAUTICAL STUDY FOR POSSIBLE VISUAL FLIGHT RULES (VFR) EFFECT DISCLOSED THE
FOLLOWING:
> The proposed structure would have no effect on any existing or proposed VFR arrival or departure routes,
operations or procedures.
> The proposed structure would not conflict with airspace required to conduct normal VFR traffic pattern
operations at any known public use or military airports.
> The proposed structure would not penetrate those altitudes normally considered available to airmen for VFR
en route flight.
The cumulative impact of the proposed structure, when combined with other existing structures is not
considered significant. Study did not disclose any adverse effect on existing or proposed public-use or military
airports or navigational facilities. Nor would the proposal affect the capacity of any known existing or planned
public-use or military airport.
Therefore, it is determined that the proposed construction would not have a substantial adverse effect on the
safe and efficient utilization of the navigable airspace by aircraft or on any air navigation facility and would not
be a hazard to air navigation.
Page 32 of 53
Page 6 of 8
Case Description for ASN 2025-ASW-5522-OE
Filing proposed building development project and temporary cranes; College Station, TX.
Page 33 of 53
Page 7 of 8
TOPO Map for ASN 2025-ASW-5522-OE
Page 34 of 53
Page 8 of 8
Sectional Map for ASN 2025-ASW-5522-OE
Page 35 of 53
Mail Processing Center
Federal Aviation Administration
Southwest Regional Office
Obstruction Evaluation Group
10101 Hillwood Parkway
Fort Worth, TX 76177
Aeronautical Study No.
2025-ASW-5523-OE
Page 1 of 8
Issued Date: 08/07/2025
LV COLLECTIVE
MAURICIO VISBAL
801 Congress Ave
Suite 200
Austin, TX 78701
** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION **
The Federal Aviation Administration has conducted an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C.,
Section 44718 and if applicable Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 77, concerning:
Structure:Building West Extent of Building
County, State:Brazos, Texas
Collected Point(s):
Label Latitude Longitude SE DET AGL AMSL
West Extent of Building 30-37-21.19N 96-20-35.34W 337 Ft 300 Ft 637 Ft
This aeronautical study revealed that the structure would have no substantial adverse effect on the safe
and efficient utilization of the navigable airspace by aircraft or on the operation of air navigation facilities.
Therefore, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, it is hereby determined that the structure would not be a
hazard to air navigation provided the following condition(s) is(are) met:
As a condition to this Determination, the structure is to be marked/lighted in accordance with FAA Advisory
circular 70/7460-1 M Change 1, Obstruction Marking and Lighting, red lights-Chapters 4,5(Red),&15.
Any failure or malfunction that lasts more than thirty (30) minutes and affects a top light or flashing obstruction
light, regardless of its position, should be reported immediately to (877) 487-6867 so a Notice to Airmen
(NOTAM) can be issued. As soon as the normal operation is restored, notify the same number.
It is required that FAA Form 7460-2, Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, be e-filed any time the
project is abandoned or:
_____ At least 10 days prior to start of construction (7460-2, Part 1)
__X__ Within 5 days after the construction reaches its greatest height (7460-2, Part 2)
See attachment for additional condition(s) or information.
This determination expires on 02/07/2027 unless:
Page 36 of 53
Page 2 of 8
(a)the construction is started (not necessarily completed) and FAA Form 7460-2, Notice of Actual
Construction or Alteration, is received by this office.
(b)extended, revised, or terminated by the issuing office.
(c)the construction is subject to the licensing authority of the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) and an application for a construction permit has been filed, as required by the FCC, within
6 months of the date of this determination. In such case, the determination expires on the date
prescribed by the FCC for completion of construction, or the date the FCC denies the application.
NOTE: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THIS DETERMINATION MUST
BE E-FILED AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE. AFTER RE-EVALUATION
OF CURRENT OPERATIONS IN THE AREA OF THE STRUCTURE TO DETERMINE THAT NO
SIGNIFICANT AERONAUTICAL CHANGES HAVE OCCURRED, YOUR DETERMINATION MAY BE
ELIGIBLE FOR ONE EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD.
This determination is subject to review if an interested party files a petition that is received by the FAA on or
before September 06, 2025. In the event an interested party files a petition for review, it must contain a full
statement of the basis upon which the petition is made. Petitions can be submitted to the Manager, Rules and
Regulations Group via email at OEPetitions@faa.gov, or via mail to Federal Aviation Administration, Air
Traffic Organization, Rules and Regulations Group, 5th floor, 600 Independence Ave, SW., Washington, DC
20597. FAA encourages the use of email to ensure timely processing.
This determination becomes final on September 16, 2025 unless a petition is timely filed. In which case, this
determination will not become final pending disposition of the petition. Interested parties will be notified of the
grant of any review. Any questions regarding your petition, contact Rules and Regulations Group via telephone
(202) 267-8783.
This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates, heights,
frequency(ies) and power. Any changes in coordinates, heights and frequencies or use of greater power, except
those frequencies specified in the Colo Void Clause Coalition; Antenna System Co-Location; Voluntary Best
Practices, will void this determination. Any future construction or alteration, including increase to heights,
power or the addition of other transmitters, requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination includes all
previously filed frequencies and power for this structure.
If construction or alteration is dismantled or destroyed, you must submit notice to the FAA within 5 days after
the construction or alteration is dismantled or destroyed.
This determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes, derricks, etc., which may be
used during actual construction of the structure. However, this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as
indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the
FAA.
This determination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace
by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or
regulation of any Federal, State, or local government body.
This aeronautical study considered and analyzed the impact on existing and proposed arrival, departure, and
en route procedures for aircraft operating under both visual flight rules and instrument flight rules; the impact
on all existing and planned public-use airports, military airports and aeronautical facilities; and the cumulative
impact resulting from the studied structure when combined with the impact of other existing or proposed
Page 37 of 53
Page 3 of 8
structures. The study disclosed that the described structure would have no substantial adverse effect on air
navigation.
An account of the study findings, aeronautical objections received by the FAA during the study (if any), and the
basis for the FAA's decision in this matter can be found on the following page(s).
If we can be of further assistance, please contact andrew.hollie@faa.gov, at 1-817-222-5933, or
andrew.hollie@faa.gov. On any future correspondence concerning this matter, please refer to Aeronautical
Study Number 2025-ASW-5523-OE.
Signature Control No: 656344188-672799785 ( DNH )
Julie A. Morgan
Manager, Obstruction Evaluation Group
Attachment(s)
Additional Information
Case Description
Map(s)
Page 38 of 53
Page 4 of 8
Additional information for ASN 2025-ASW-5523-OE
Abbreviations
AGL = Above Ground Level
MSL = Mean Sea Level
NM = Nautical Mile
RWY = Runway
NEH = No Effect Height
Part 77 = Title 14 CFR Part 77, Safe, Efficient Use and Preservation of the Navigable Airspace
Our study has disclosed that this proposed building project is composed of four studies that represent the
corners of the building, located approximately 2.26 nm northeast of the airport reference point, is within the
protected surfaces at Easterwood Field (CLL), College Station, TX.
The four studies are:
Aeronautical Study AGL / MSL Direct distance from runway end 16
2025-ASW-5520-OE 300 / 638 11340 feet / 1.86 nm
2025-ASW-5521-OE 300 / 633 11245 feet / 1.85 nm
2025-ASW-5522-OE 300 / 633 11123 feet / 1.83 nm
2025-ASW-5523-OE 300 / 637 11281 feet / 1.85 nm
Aeronautical study number 2025-ASW-5522-OE is being circulated for public comment as the closest point
with the greatest impact. All comments for this study will be a comment on the project.
At the proposed height, this structure will penetrate these protected airport surfaces:
> 77.17 (a)(2) A height that is 200 feet AGL, or above the established airport elevation, whichever is higher,
within 3 nautical miles of the established reference point of an airport with its longest runway more than 3,200
feet in actual length, and that height increases in the proportion of 100 feet for each additional nautical mile
from the airport up to a maximum of 499 feet.
2025-ASW-5520-OE exceeds by 100 feet.
2025-ASW-5521-OE exceeds by 100 feet.
2025-ASW-5522-OE exceeds by 100 feet.
2025-ASW-5523-OE exceeds by 100 feet.
> 77.17 (a)(5) The surface of a takeoff and landing area of an airport or any imaginary surface established under
77.19, 77.21, or 77.23.
77.19 (b) Conical surface. A surface extending outward and upward from the periphery of the horizontal surface
at a slope of 20 to 1 for a horizontal distance of 4,000 feet.
2025-ASW-5520-OE exceeds by 108 feet.
2025-ASW-5521-OE exceeds by 107 feet.
2025-ASW-5522-OE exceeds by 114 feet.
2025-ASW-5523-OE exceeds by 110 feet.
Page 39 of 53
Page 5 of 8
**Part 77 obstruction standards are used to screen the many proposals submitted in order to identify those
which warrant further aeronautical study. This study is conducted in order to determine if the proposal would
have a significant adverse effect on protected aeronautical operations and airspace. While part 77 obstruction
standards trigger formal aeronautical study, including public circularization, these obstruction standards do
not constitute absolute or arbitrary criteria for identification of hazards to air navigation. Accordingly, the fact
that a proposed structure exceeds certain obstruction standards of part 77 is in itself not sufficient grounds for
issuance of a determination of hazard to air navigation.
The proposal was circularized for public comment on 06/25/2025 to 4961 email respondents with no response
returned.
AERONAUTICAL STUDY FOR POSSIBLE INSTRUMENT FLIGHT RULES (IFR) EFFECT DISCLOSED
THE FOLLOWING:
> The proposed structure would have no effect on any existing or proposed IFR arrival/departure routes,
operations, or procedures.
> The proposed structure would have no effect on any existing or proposed IFR en route routes, operations, or
procedures.
> The proposed structure would have no effect on any existing or proposed IFR minimum flight altitudes.
AERONAUTICAL STUDY FOR POSSIBLE VISUAL FLIGHT RULES (VFR) EFFECT DISCLOSED THE
FOLLOWING:
> The proposed structure would have no effect on any existing or proposed VFR arrival or departure routes,
operations or procedures.
> The proposed structure would not conflict with airspace required to conduct normal VFR traffic pattern
operations at any known public use or military airports.
> The proposed structure would not penetrate those altitudes normally considered available to airmen for VFR
en route flight.
The cumulative impact of the proposed structure, when combined with other existing structures is not
considered significant. Study did not disclose any adverse effect on existing or proposed public-use or military
airports or navigational facilities. Nor would the proposal affect the capacity of any known existing or planned
public-use or military airport.
Therefore, it is determined that the proposed construction would not have a substantial adverse effect on the
safe and efficient utilization of the navigable airspace by aircraft or on any air navigation facility and would not
be a hazard to air navigation.
Page 40 of 53
Page 6 of 8
Case Description for ASN 2025-ASW-5523-OE
Filing proposed building development project and temporary cranes; College Station, TX.
Page 41 of 53
Page 7 of 8
TOPO Map for ASN 2025-ASW-5523-OE
Page 42 of 53
Page 8 of 8
Sectional Map for ASN 2025-ASW-5523-OE
Page 43 of 53
Page 44 of 53
Page 45 of 53
From:Robin Macias
To:Jeff Howell
Subject:FW: Height Variance Request - 725 University Drive
Date:Thursday, December 18, 2025 8:52:27 AM
Attachments:Height Variance Letter for 725 University Student Housing, Tower Crane, Mobile Crane Letter.pdf
FAA Letters 725 University.pdf
From: O'Neill, John <joneill@tamus.edu>
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2025 8:45 AM
To: Anthony Armstrong <aarmstrong@cstx.gov>; Robin Macias <rmacias@cstx.gov>
Cc: Kevin Davis <kdavis@easterwoodairport.com>
Subject: Height Variance Request - 725 University Drive
***** This is an email from an EXTERNAL source. DO NOT click links or open
attachments without positive sender verification of purpose. Never enter USERNAME,
PASSWORD or sensitive information on linked pages from this email. *****
Anthony,
The Texas A&M University System (TAMUS) relies on the expertise of the Easterwood
Airport Management (EAM) team and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to
determine the impacts of height variance requests which would or could affect the
airport’s operations.
At this time, the Easterwood Airport Management team has no objections to granting the
height variance request for the proposed construction of a 300-foot-tall building,
utilizing a 375 foot tower crane and a 400 foot helper crane, at 725 University Drive, so
long as the builder complies with the conditions as outlined in the FAA Letters (see
attached).
In consultation with the EAM team, the TAMU System has no objections based on the
determinations made by our subject matter experts in the field, as long as all conditions,
as outlined in the attached documents, have been met.
Thanks, and should you need anything else, please feel free to contact me,
John
John J. O’Neill, MBA | Executive Director
Business Affairs
joneill@tamus.edu
1262 TAMU | College Station, TX 77840-7896
Tel. 979.458.6234 | Fax 979.458.6247 | www.tamus.edu
Moore/Connally Building
301 Tarrow St., 5th Floor
College Station, TX 77840-7896
Page 46 of 53
THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM
Page 47 of 53
Easterwood Airport Management
1 McKenzie Terminal Blvd,
College Station, TX 77845
November 19, 2025
Anthony Armstrong, P.E., CFM,
Land Development Review Administrator
City Of College Station
1101 Texas Ave.
College Station, TX 77840
Re: Building, Tower Crane, and Helper Crane at 725 University Dr.
Dear Mr. Armstrong:
Easterwood Airport Management has reviewed the application requesting a height variance
for the construction of a 300-foot-tall building, a 375-foot-tall tower crane, and a 400-foot-
tall temporary helper crane at 725 University Dr. We have also reviewed the FAA’s
"Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation" for the temporary structure.
Easterwood Airport Management has no objection to the approval of these height variances,
provided that all conditions specified in the FAA determinations are fully met by the
builder.
Respectfully,
Kevin Davis
Easterwood Airport Management
Page 48 of 53
LEVEL 1
100'-0"
LEVEL 2A
125'-10"
LEVEL 3
135'-4"2 / A-300LEVEL 8
182'-10"
LEVEL 10
209'-10"
LEVEL 11
219'-10"
LEVEL 12
229'-10"
LEVEL 13
239'-10"
LEVEL 14
249'-10"
LEVEL 15
259'-10"
LEVEL 16
269'-10"
LEVEL 17
279'-10"
LEVEL 18
289'-10"
LEVEL 19
299'-10"
LEVEL 20
309'-10"
LEVEL 21
319'-10"
LEVEL 22
329'-10"
LEVEL 23
339'-10"
LEVEL 24
350'-10"
B.O. ROOF STRUCTURE
363'-0"
11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 112
T.O. HIGH ROOF STRUCT
375'-2"
LEVEL 1A
106'-10"
LEVEL 2
116'-4"
LEVEL 4
144'-10"
LEVEL 5
154'-4"
LEVEL 6
163'-10"
LEVEL 7
173'-4"
LEVEL 9
195'-10"
23.1
3 / A-3114 / A-3104 / A-3113'-0" 6'-10" 9'-6" 9'-6" 9'-6" 9'-6" 9'-6" 9'-6" 9'-6" 9'-6"13'-0" 14'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 11'-0" 12'-2"12'-2"278'-5"13
8.03
8.02
7.09
3.01
4.01
4.01
8.03
A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1
A2 A2 A2 A2 A2 A2 A2
A1 A1 A1 A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1
A2 A2 A2 A2
A1A1
A2 A2 A2 A2A2A2A2A2A3A3
A2C1 A2 A2 A2 A2 A2A2A2A2A2A2A2A2
A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1 A1 A1
A1A1A1
A1A1A1
A1A1A1
A1A1A1
A1A1A1
A1A1A1
A1A1A1
A1A1A1
A1A1A1
A1A1A1
A1A1A1
A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1
A2
A2 A2 A2 A2 A2 A2 A2
A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1
B1B1
B1B1
B1B1
B1B1
B1B1
B1B1
B1B1
B1B1
B1B1
B1B1
B1B1
B1B1
A3A3
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
D1 D1
D1
D1
5.09
LEVEL 0
97'-0"
A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1C1C1
A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1C1C1
23.03
B1
B1
B1
B1
26.0626.0626.0626.06
SF20
SF9
05 73 00
5.03
8.03
7.09
7.09
7.09
7.09
7.09
7.05
23.03
@ LEVEL 911'-0" TYP@ LVLS 10-228'-6" TYP23.03@ LEVEL 2411'-0" TYP@ LEVEL 239'-2" TYP23.03
23.03
A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1C1
A1 A1 A1 A1 C1 A1 A1 A1
5.1A
SF4 SF3 SF2 SF1
4.1B
SF25 3 / A-300A / A-541
5.10
5.16
282'-8"26'-8" 2'-8"
44 VERT BRICKS
9'-8"3'-0"
26.07
4'-3"22.10
9'-4 7/8"14'-8"14'-8"14'-8"14'-8"14'-8"14'-8"14'-8"14'-8"14'-8"14'-8"
2'-0"2'-8"2'-8"
EQ EQ
22.11
22.10
22.10 22.10
334.00
337.16
336.92
337.11
337.01
3'-8"
98'-0"
96'-0"
95'-4"
22.11
335.08
94'-0"94'-8"
95'-4"
23.06
21.03
S1 S2
B1M1
M2 C1S1
G1
G3
G2
G2G2
S2
S3
G3 S3
4.07
4.07
4.07
07 95 13
7.13
32 31 00.A1 182.3VARIANCE REQUEST117.4HEIGHT BY RIGHT 520.60
VARIANCE REQUEST HEIGHT 638.00
1. CONTROL JOINTS AND PANEL JOINTS TO ALIGN WITH OPENINGS AND PANEL JOINTS U.N.O.
2. INTAKE / EXHAUST VENTS TO BE ALIGNED WITH WINDOW OPENINGS AND PANEL JOINTS U.N.O.
MAINTAIN 3'-0" MIN FROM OPERABLE OPENINGS.
3. REFER TO WALL SECTIONS AND PLANS FOR WALL TYPES.
4. REFER TO CIVIL PLANS FOR FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS.
5. COORDINATE LOCATION OF FDC AND KNOX BOX WITH FIRE DEPARTMENT AND ARCHITECT PRIOR
TO INSTALL.
6. COORDINATE LOCATION OF EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURES WITH ARCHITECT.
7. REFER TO A-500 SERIES FOR MATERIAL TRANSITIONS
8. PAINT ALL EXPOSED MATERIALS NOT FACTORY FINISHED TO MATCH SURROUNDING WALL FINISH
MATERIALS.
BUILDING ELEVATION NOTES
MODULAR BRICK
COLOR: BLEND BLACK GLAZED/
BLACK IRON/BLACK DIAMOND
MFR: ACME
RESIDENTIAL GLAZING
MFR:INTUS
COLOR: BLACK FRAME
EXTERIOR MATERIALS LEGEND
EIFS PANEL
COLOR: 31137
MFR: STO
EIFS PANEL
COLOR: 37105
MFR: STO
EFIS PANEL
COLOR: 37101
MFR: STO
METAL PANEL
COLOR: CHAMPAGNE
MFR: LUX
MESH SCREEN
COLOR: DARK GRAY
MFR: FLEX FACADE
STOREFRONT GLAZING WITH
COMPRESSION CAPS
MFR: YKK
FIN: DARK BRONZE FRAME
METAL SILL/COPING/FLASHING
/HEADER/CANOPY/LOUVERS
COLOR: DARK GRAY
MFR: VARIES
B1
S1
S2
S3
M1
M2
G1
G2
M3
G3
EXPOSED CONCRETE
COLOR: DARK GRAY
MFR: TBD
C1
FRAMELESS GLASS GUARDRAIL
COLOR: BLACK POSTS
MFR: TBD
G4
WINDOW WALL GLAZING WITH
SOLID SLAB COVERS
MFR: YKK
FIN: DARK BRONZE FRAME
*G1, G2, G3, AND G4 GLASS TO BE CLEAR AND NOT REFLECTIVE PER SECTION 5.8.B.4.b.2
SOLID WOOD DOOR
COLOR: STAINED CEDAR
MFR: TBD
W1GRAPHIC REPRESENTATIONPHOTOGRAPHIC REPRESENTATIONPHOTOTRANSFORMER SCREEN
MFR: WESTERN STATES METAL
ROOFING
COLOR: CHARCOAL GRAY
M4
KEY PLAN
A B
PROJECT NUMBER:
DATE:
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE:
ISSUED FOR:
REVISIONS:1/27/2026 9:16:35 AMAutodesk Docs://125035.00 TAMU 2.0/124035_TAMU 2.0_A24.rvtRAMBLER NORTHGATE801 LEGACY POINT DRIVECOLLEGE STATION, TX 77840125035
01/30/2026
PERMIT
BUILDING ELEVATION -
NORTH
A-2003/32" = 1'-0"
NORTH ELEVATION1
PROJECT FLAGNOTES
3.01 CONCRETE COLUMN WITH CUSTOM FORM LINER, RE: STRUCTURAL
4.01 VERTICAL STACKED BRICK WITH PROTRUDING GLAZED BRICKS (GLEN GERY, BLACK GLAZED) @ SET
PATTERN
4.07 DEFLECTION JOINT, ALIGN WITH BOTTOM OF L SHAPE, RE: STRUCTURAL
05 73 00 GLASS AND GLAZED HANDRAILS
5.03 STEEL CHANNEL, RE: STRUCT, PAINTED WITH HIGH PERFORMANCE PAINT SYSTEM
5.09 METAL GUARDRAIL WITH TPO BOOT FLASHINGS @ ROOF PENETRATIONS
5.10 METAL LADDER, TYP.
5.16 DEFLECTION JOINT, ALIGN WITH BOTTOM OF SLAB, TYP
07 95 13 EXPANSION JOINT COVER
7.05 22 GA PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET CAP W/ REVEAL PROFILE
7.09 22 GA PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET CAP
7.13 METAL SIDING HORIZONTAL Z CHANNEL
8.02 FIXED WINDOW
8.03 WINDOW WALL
21.03 FDC
22.10 DOWNSPOUT NOZZLE, RE: PLUMBING
22.11 HOSE BIB, RE: PLUMBING
23.03 X-VENT FOR DRYER/BATHROOM VENT, RE: MECHANICAL
23.06 MECH LOUVER, RE: MECH
26.06 EXTERIOR LIGHTING MOUNTED TO CONCRETE COLUMN, PROVIDE CONDUIT AND J BOX IN COLUMN
26.07 FAA LIGHTING TOWER TO COMPLY WITH ALL FAA REGULATIONS
32 31 00.A1 CHAIN LINK FENCE
1
0'4'8'16'32'
NO DATE DESCRIPTION
Page 49 of 53
1. CONTROL JOINTS AND PANEL JOINTS TO ALIGN WITH OPENINGS AND PANEL JOINTS U.N.O.
2. INTAKE / EXHAUST VENTS TO BE ALIGNED WITH WINDOW OPENINGS AND PANEL JOINTS U.N.O.
MAINTAIN 3'-0" MIN FROM OPERABLE OPENINGS.
3. REFER TO WALL SECTIONS AND PLANS FOR WALL TYPES.
4. REFER TO CIVIL PLANS FOR FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS.
5. COORDINATE LOCATION OF FDC AND KNOX BOX WITH FIRE DEPARTMENT AND ARCHITECT PRIOR
TO INSTALL.
6. COORDINATE LOCATION OF EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURES WITH ARCHITECT.
7. REFER TO A-500 SERIES FOR MATERIAL TRANSITIONS
8. PAINT ALL EXPOSED MATERIALS NOT FACTORY FINISHED TO MATCH SURROUNDING WALL FINISH
MATERIALS.
BUILDING ELEVATION NOTES
LEVEL 1
100'-0"
LEVEL 2A
125'-10"
LEVEL 3
135'-4"
LEVEL 8
182'-10"
LEVEL 10
209'-10"
LEVEL 11
219'-10"
LEVEL 12
229'-10"
LEVEL 13
239'-10"
LEVEL 14
249'-10"
LEVEL 15
259'-10"
LEVEL 16
269'-10"
LEVEL 17
279'-10"
LEVEL 18
289'-10"
LEVEL 19
299'-10"
LEVEL 20
309'-10"
LEVEL 21
319'-10"
LEVEL 22
329'-10"
LEVEL 23
339'-10"
LEVEL 24
350'-10"
B.O. ROOF STRUCTURE
363'-0"
ABC
1 / A-300T.O. HIGH ROOF STRUCT
375'-2"
LEVEL 1A
106'-10"
LEVEL 2
116'-4"
LEVEL 4
144'-10"
LEVEL 5
154'-4"
LEVEL 6
163'-10"
LEVEL 7
173'-4"
LEVEL 9
195'-10"
J
4 / A-3124 / A-3134 / A-3141 / A-3183 / A-3123 / A-3133 / A-314G
12'-2"12'-2"11'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"14'-0"13'-0"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"6'-10"3'-0"2 / A-318DEFH
8.03
8.02
7.09
8.03
A1 A1
A1 A1
A1 A1
A1 A1
A2A2
A1 A1
A1 A1
A1 A1
A1 A1
A1 A1
A1 A1
A1 A1
A1 A1
A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1 A1 A1
A2 A2 A2 A2
A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 C1
A2 D1
A1
A2 A2A2D1
C1 C1
C1 C1
C1 C1
C1 C1
C1 C1
C1 C1
C1 C1
C1 C1
C1 C1
A1 A1 A1 A1C1C1
A1 A1 A1 A1C1C1
A1 A1 A1 A1C1C1
D1 D1
D1
A1
A1
A1
LEVEL 0
97'-0"
A1 C1
C1A1
A1 C1
A1 C1
A1 C1
A1 C1
A1 A1 A1 A1
A1 A1 A1 A1
C1 C1
C1 C1
C1
C1
C1
C1
7.09
5.097.09
8.03
7.05
SF21
23.03
3.02
5.02
A1 A1
5.1B
A1A1
A1 C1
A1
A1 C1
C1
2.5A
L2
L2
L2273'-6"2'-0"5.16
A2 D1 A2
22.10
334.00334.00334.47
334.59 95'-4"
14'-8" 14'-8" 14'-8" 14'-8" 14'-8" 14'-8" 14'-8" 9'-4 7/8"4'-8"1'-7 5/8"7.05
EQ EQ
10 VERT BRICKS
2'-2 1/4"
2'-8"
23.02
EQ EQ
10'-0"22.10L3
EQEQEQ
22.11
S1
B1
M2 C1S1
G1 G3S2
S2
G2G4
S3
G3
G3
G3
B1
S3
4.07
4.07
4.07
MODULAR BRICK
COLOR: BLEND BLACK GLAZED/
BLACK IRON/BLACK DIAMOND
MFR: ACME
RESIDENTIAL GLAZING
MFR:INTUS
COLOR: BLACK FRAME
EXTERIOR MATERIALS LEGEND
EIFS PANEL
COLOR: 31137
MFR: STO
EIFS PANEL
COLOR: 37105
MFR: STO
EFIS PANEL
COLOR: 37101
MFR: STO
METAL PANEL
COLOR: CHAMPAGNE
MFR: LUX
MESH SCREEN
COLOR: DARK GRAY
MFR: FLEX FACADE
STOREFRONT GLAZING WITH
COMPRESSION CAPS
MFR: YKK
FIN: DARK BRONZE FRAME
METAL SILL/COPING/FLASHING
/HEADER/CANOPY/LOUVERS
COLOR: DARK GRAY
MFR: VARIES
B1
S1
S2
S3
M1
M2
G1
G2
M3
G3
EXPOSED CONCRETE
COLOR: DARK GRAY
MFR: TBD
C1
FRAMELESS GLASS GUARDRAIL
COLOR: BLACK POSTS
MFR: TBD
G4
WINDOW WALL GLAZING WITH
SOLID SLAB COVERS
MFR: YKK
FIN: DARK BRONZE FRAME
*G1, G2, G3, AND G4 GLASS TO BE CLEAR AND NOT REFLECTIVE PER SECTION 5.8.B.4.b.2
SOLID WOOD DOOR
COLOR: STAINED CEDAR
MFR: TBD
W1GRAPHIC REPRESENTATIONPHOTOGRAPHIC REPRESENTATIONPHOTOTRANSFORMER SCREEN
MFR: WESTERN STATES METAL
ROOFING
COLOR: CHARCOAL GRAY
M4
3/32" = 1'-0"
EAST ELEVATION1
KEY PLAN
A B
PROJECT NUMBER:
DATE:
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE:
ISSUED FOR:
REVISIONS:1/27/2026 9:16:55 AMAutodesk Docs://125035.00 TAMU 2.0/124035_TAMU 2.0_A24.rvtRAMBLER NORTHGATE801 LEGACY POINT DRIVECOLLEGE STATION, TX 77840125035
01/30/2026
PERMIT
BUILDING ELEVATION -
EAST
A-20110'4'8'16'32'
PROJECT FLAGNOTES
3.02 PAINT CONCRETE CRASH WALLS WHERE EXPOSED TO EXTERIOR, TYP
4.07 DEFLECTION JOINT, ALIGN WITH BOTTOM OF L SHAPE, RE: STRUCTURAL
5.02 METAL SCREEN, 50% OPEN AIR
5.09 METAL GUARDRAIL WITH TPO BOOT FLASHINGS @ ROOF PENETRATIONS
5.16 DEFLECTION JOINT, ALIGN WITH BOTTOM OF SLAB, TYP
7.05 22 GA PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET CAP W/ REVEAL PROFILE
7.09 22 GA PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET CAP
8.02 FIXED WINDOW
8.03 WINDOW WALL
22.10 DOWNSPOUT NOZZLE, RE: PLUMBING
22.11 HOSE BIB, RE: PLUMBING
23.02 GAS METER, RE: MECH
23.03 X-VENT FOR DRYER/BATHROOM VENT, RE: MECHANICAL
NO DATE DESCRIPTION
Page 50 of 53
1. CONTROL JOINTS AND PANEL JOINTS TO ALIGN WITH OPENINGS AND PANEL JOINTS U.N.O.
2. INTAKE / EXHAUST VENTS TO BE ALIGNED WITH WINDOW OPENINGS AND PANEL JOINTS U.N.O.
MAINTAIN 3'-0" MIN FROM OPERABLE OPENINGS.
3. REFER TO WALL SECTIONS AND PLANS FOR WALL TYPES.
4. REFER TO CIVIL PLANS FOR FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS.
5. COORDINATE LOCATION OF FDC AND KNOX BOX WITH FIRE DEPARTMENT AND ARCHITECT PRIOR
TO INSTALL.
6. COORDINATE LOCATION OF EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURES WITH ARCHITECT.
7. REFER TO A-500 SERIES FOR MATERIAL TRANSITIONS
8. PAINT ALL EXPOSED MATERIALS NOT FACTORY FINISHED TO MATCH SURROUNDING WALL FINISH
MATERIALS.
BUILDING ELEVATION NOTES
LEVEL 1
100'-0"
LEVEL 2A
125'-10"
LEVEL 3
135'-4"2 / A-300LEVEL 8
182'-10"
LEVEL 10
209'-10"
LEVEL 11
219'-10"
LEVEL 12
229'-10"
LEVEL 13
239'-10"
LEVEL 14
249'-10"
LEVEL 15
259'-10"
LEVEL 16
269'-10"
LEVEL 17
279'-10"
LEVEL 18
289'-10"
LEVEL 19
299'-10"
LEVEL 20
309'-10"
LEVEL 21
319'-10"
LEVEL 22
329'-10"
LEVEL 23
339'-10"
LEVEL 24
350'-10"
B.O. ROOF STRUCTURE
363'-0"
111098765431 12
T.O. HIGH ROOF STRUCT
375'-2"
LEVEL 1A
106'-10"
LEVEL 2
116'-4"
LEVEL 4
144'-10"
LEVEL 5
154'-4"
LEVEL 6
163'-10"
LEVEL 7
173'-4"
LEVEL 9
195'-10"
2 3.1
1 / A-3163'-3"12'-2"12'-2"11'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"14'-0"13'-0"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"6'-10"3'-0"282'-8"13
2 / A-3197.09
5.06
5.05
3.02
5.03
21.03
A1A1A1A1
A1A1A1A1
A1A1A1A1
A1A1A1A1
A1A1A1A1
A1A1A1A1
A1A1A1A1
A1A1A1A1
A1A1A1A1
A1A1A1A1
A1A1A1A1
A1A1A1A1
A1 A1A1A1 A4A1A1A1A4
B1A1A1A1B1
B1A1A1A1B1
B1A1A1A1B1
B1A1A1A1B1
B1A1A1A1B1
B1A1A1A1B1
B1A1A1A1B1
B1A1A1A1B1
B1A1A1A1B1
B1A1A1A1B1
B1A1A1A1B1
B1A1A1A1B1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A2 D1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1A1
A2
A1
A2 A2 A2
A1
A1 C1 A1A1A1 A1A1
A2A2A2
A1A1A1A1A1 A1
A1
A2
A2 A2 A2A2A2A2
A1 A1A1A1
A2 A2 A2 A2A2A2A2A2A2
B1B1
B1B1
B1B1
B1B1
B1B1
B1B1
B1B1
B1B1
B1B1
B1B1
B1B1
B1B1
B1B1
A1 A1A1A1
A1 A1A1A1
A1 A1A1A1
A1 A1A1A1
A1 A1A1A1
A1 A1A1A1
A1 A1A1A1
A1 A1A1A1
A1 A1A1A1
A1 A1A1A1
A1 A1A1A1
A1 A1A1A1
8.03
8.02
C1 A1A1A1 A1A1
C1 A1A1A1 A1A1
C1 A1A1A1 A1A1
LEVEL 0
97'-0"
D1
A1A1A1 A1A1
A1A1A1 A1A1
A1A1A1 A1A1
A1A1A1 A1A1
A1A1A1 A1A1
A1A1A1 A1A1
A2
2 / A-316A2 A2 A2 A2A2A2A2A2A2
A1A1A1A1A1B1B1 B1A1A1A1B1
A3 A3 A3 A3
A1
A1
A1
A1 C1
C1A1
A1 C1
C1A1
A1 C1
C1
C1A1
A1
8.04
7.05
7.09
8.01
8.03
3.02
23.03
11.05
5.02
A1 C1 A1A1A1 A1A1
C1 A1A1A1 A1A1
C1 A1A1A1 A1A1A1
A1
2.5B2.3A
L13 / A-3005.16
8 VERT BRICK5'-4"4'-3"334.75
334.47
333.00334.11
334.23
334.67
334.82335.25
336.92
337.90
94'-0"
95'-4"95'-4"
99'-4"98'-0"
15'-8"15'-8"5'-4"
S1 S2S3
B1
B1
M1
M2 C1S1
G1 G3
G2
G2
G4
G2
G3
G3
G3G3
G3
B1
M2
B1
S1
S1
S2
MODULAR BRICK
COLOR: BLEND BLACK GLAZED/
BLACK IRON/BLACK DIAMOND
MFR: ACME
RESIDENTIAL GLAZING
MFR:INTUS
COLOR: BLACK FRAME
EXTERIOR MATERIALS LEGEND
EIFS PANEL
COLOR: 31137
MFR: STO
EIFS PANEL
COLOR: 37105
MFR: STO
EFIS PANEL
COLOR: 37101
MFR: STO
METAL PANEL
COLOR: CHAMPAGNE
MFR: LUX
MESH SCREEN
COLOR: DARK GRAY
MFR: FLEX FACADE
STOREFRONT GLAZING WITH
COMPRESSION CAPS
MFR: YKK
FIN: DARK BRONZE FRAME
METAL SILL/COPING/FLASHING
/HEADER/CANOPY/LOUVERS
COLOR: DARK GRAY
MFR: VARIES
B1
S1
S2
S3
M1
M2
G1
G2
M3
G3
EXPOSED CONCRETE
COLOR: DARK GRAY
MFR: TBD
C1
FRAMELESS GLASS GUARDRAIL
COLOR: BLACK POSTS
MFR: TBD
G4
WINDOW WALL GLAZING WITH
SOLID SLAB COVERS
MFR: YKK
FIN: DARK BRONZE FRAME
*G1, G2, G3, AND G4 GLASS TO BE CLEAR AND NOT REFLECTIVE PER SECTION 5.8.B.4.b.2
SOLID WOOD DOOR
COLOR: STAINED CEDAR
MFR: TBD
W1GRAPHIC REPRESENTATIONPHOTOGRAPHIC REPRESENTATIONPHOTOTRANSFORMER SCREEN
MFR: WESTERN STATES METAL
ROOFING
COLOR: CHARCOAL GRAY
M4
3/32" = 1'-0"
SOUTH ELEVATION1
KEY PLAN
A B
PROJECT NUMBER:
DATE:
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE:
ISSUED FOR:
REVISIONS:1/27/2026 9:17:22 AMAutodesk Docs://125035.00 TAMU 2.0/124035_TAMU 2.0_A24.rvtRAMBLER NORTHGATE801 LEGACY POINT DRIVECOLLEGE STATION, TX 77840125035
01/30/2026
PERMIT
BUILDING ELEVATION -
SOUTH
A-202
1
0'4'8'16'32'
PROJECT FLAGNOTES
3.02 PAINT CONCRETE CRASH WALLS WHERE EXPOSED TO EXTERIOR, TYP
5.02 METAL SCREEN, 50% OPEN AIR
5.03 STEEL CHANNEL, RE: STRUCT, PAINTED WITH HIGH PERFORMANCE PAINT SYSTEM
5.05 METAL SCREEN WALL MOUNTED TO STEEL POST SUPPORTS
5.06 METAL GATE @ TRANSFORMERS
5.16 DEFLECTION JOINT, ALIGN WITH BOTTOM OF SLAB, TYP
7.05 22 GA PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET CAP W/ REVEAL PROFILE
7.09 22 GA PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET CAP
8.01 GLASS WINDSCREEN
8.02 FIXED WINDOW
8.03 WINDOW WALL
8.04 HIGH SPEED COILING DOOR
11.05 JUMBOTRON SCREEN AND SPEAKERS
21.03 FDC
23.03 X-VENT FOR DRYER/BATHROOM VENT, RE: MECHANICAL
NO DATE DESCRIPTION
Page 51 of 53