HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/29/2013 - Special Minutes City Council MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL RETREAT
4D CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
JANUARY 29, 2013
STATE OF TEXAS §
§
COUNTY OF BRAZOS §
Present:
Nancy Berry
Council:
Blanche Brick
Jess Fields, arrived after roll call
Karl Mooney
John Nichols
Julie Schultz
James Benham
City Staff:
Frank Simpson, Interim City Manager
Kathy Merrill, Deputy City Manager
Carla Robinson, City Attorney
Sherry Mashburn, City Secretary
1. Call to Order and Announce a Quorum is Present
With a quorum present, the Retreat of the College Station City Council was called to order by
Mayor Nancy Berry at 8:30 a.m. on Tuesday, January 29, 2013 in the College Station Utilities
Training Facility, 1603 Graham Road, College Station, Texas 77842.
2. Presentation and overview of the Retreat Agenda.
Bob Cowell, Executive Director of Planning and Development Services, presented a brief
overview of what he hoped to accomplish today.
3. Executive Session
In accordance with the Texas Government Code §551.086 — Competitive Matters, the College
Station City Council convened into Executive Session at 8:31 a.m. on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
in order to continue discussing matters pertaining to:
C w. A. Deliberation on a competitive matter; to wit:
RTRT012913 Minutes Page 1
• Power supply
The Executive Session adjourned at 9:58 a.m. on Tuesday, January 29, 2013.
4. Take action, if any, on Executive Session.
No action was required from Executive Session.
5. Presentation, possible action and discussion on the Parks and Recreation and Code
Enforcement service level impacts due to the budget reductions of the past few years.
David Schmitz, Director of Parks and Recreation, updated the Council on the budget reductions
and implications on Parks services. A comparison of the past several years was provided. A lot
of changes related to how we provide services to the citizens have occurred. One major
operational change was separating out a Recreation Fund from the General Fund. The Parks
Master Plan changed to address neighborhood and community parks. Grounds maintenance
operations in both public works and parks and recreations were consolidated for a good savings
in the budget. The Aquatics Division was audited and many recommendations were provided; in
2012, the program was converted to a more seasonal -type program. All staff training is now
done through the Red Cross, and we have reduced offerings at the Natatorium due to being
charged for use. In 2012 there was a reduction in staff. The organization was flattened at the top
for a savings; an entire level of supervision was eliminated. They also combined a lot of duties
within the department, and some duties were outsourced to other departments. They have tried
to do all they could to save money without impacting the level of service. Currently, there is a
push to renovate existing parks to bring them back up to speed, but there are some new parks
scheduled for 2013 as new development occurs. They are also looking to purchase a large parcel
of property for another community park. A program survey will be used to determine what the
citizens expect from the parks programs. For FY 13, $15 million is budgeted for Parks and
Recreation projects, such as the artificial turf fields in Veterans Park.
Bob Cowell, Executive Director of Planning and Development Services, updated the Council on
the budget reductions and implications on Code Enforcement services. For years, Code
Enforcement was under the purview of the Fire Department and was moved to Planning and
Development. In the past, there were four code officers and a supervisor; in 2009, we had six
officers, a supervisor and a staff assistant. Due to the 2011 budget cuts, staff was reduced to four
officers and a supervisor. The case load per officer has been fairly stable over the years, with
12,000 cases in 2008 and 10,500 in 2011. 2011 is also when the City introduced See Click Fix.
The cases coming in by See Click Fix are increasing each year. In 2012, we had 9,000 cases.
We moved from being proactive to being more reactive when we made the budget changes in
2011. It is important that we protect the core services of code enforcement, responding to those
complaints submitted. When we shifted to a reactive mode, the number of cases went down
because we weren't out looking for violations. Each individual code officer now handles
commercial enforcement instead of one dedicated officer as in the past. They would like to keep
the case load at no more than 3,000 cases per officer. It has become more manageable because
we have shifted to a reactive mode.
.
RTRT012913 Minutes Page 2
Slow 6. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the planning, financing, and
construction of public infrastructure to development areas within and adjacent to the City
of College Station.
Bob Cowell, Executive Director of Planning and Development Services, provided an overview
on the possible extension of infrastructure. His objectives were to help Council understand how
the City has provided for infrastructure in the past and what has changed that affects that
delivery, where infrastructure is needed, where we are currently constructing and what is need
for the future, and the financing options. Initially, the City's development was compact and the
infrastructure needs were very limited. Development has sprawled, and we are now almost fifty
square miles. Most of our basic infrastructure was delivered through a combination of City,
TXDOT and development. City facilities have been through debt, rates, grants, oversize
participation, and limited impact fees. Things have changed, such as stagnating revenue sources,
less TXDOT funding, aging infrastructure, increased sprawl, increased regulatory requirements,
and increased resistance to financing tools. These mean we have slower growing debt capacity,
needs are going unmet, a greater share of rates and debt are needed for rehabilitation and
replacement. It will be more expensive to deliver a dispersed infrastructure, and a greater share
of rate /debt is needed to meet regulatory compliance. He noted we only have so many tools in
the tool kit; the more tools we reject, the fewer tools we have to use. We will not be able to meet
our future needs if we continue to rely only upon our current policies, tools and resources.
Chuck Gilman, Director of Capital Projects, provided a brief overview of the City's five -year
plan. In the works is the reconstruction of Bird Pond Road, Cooner Street, Rock Prairie Road
East, Luther, and Munson. Also included in the Plan is the extension/widening of Jones Butler,
HSC Parkway, Rock Prairie Road West, Rock Prairie Road Overpass, and Barron East/Lakeway
South. Dave Coleman, Director of Water, noted the water /wastewater infrastructure needed in
association with these projects.
Mr. Cowell reported they have identified six major areas for development: 1) the area by the
Texas Speedway and south of Pebble Creek (area is lacking basic infrastructure); 2) the area by
Arrington (a proposed low density development lacking all basic infrastructure); 3) the Medical
district; 4) the west side by Great Oaks (a fairly dense development lacking basic infrastructure);
5) the area adjacent to George Bush and Wellborn (lacking the infrastructure to accommodate
future needs); and 6) the Biocorridor. He noted that development is also occurring in Northgate;
the infrastructure there now is appropriate, but additional infrastructure will be needed as it
develops. These are all significant pieces of infrastructure. Various Master Plans are needed to
serve future development, such as the Thoroughfare Plan, the Water Master Plan, and the
Wastewater Master Plan, in addition to several others. Mr. Gilman and Mr. Coleman listed the
types of infrastructure that will be needed in these areas.
Mr. Cowell said we need to continue to prioritize projects for future bond initiatives, continue to
use /increase rates, continue to invest in maintenance to avoid expensive replacement, and
maximize the efficiency of systems to defer expensive replacements /expansions. We will, more
than likely, be required to increase our participation in TXDOT projects and seek ways to
( reimburse City expenditures. We should look at targeted impact fees, development agreements,
RTRT012913 Minutes Page 3
assessments, and the strategic use of TIRZ, MUD and MMD. The City needs to focus its
funding on big projects with the traditional tools of debt and rates for arterials, wastewater
treatment plants, water towers, etc. The City should participate in strategic partnerships to fund
projects with the traditional tools of debt and rates. Also, the City should allow /create tools that
will enable reimbursement to the developer who fronts the cost of infrastructure delivery through
tools such as an MMD, MUD, etc. Staff recommends a series of workshops to develop policies
for each of these areas and to tailor our policies and tools for the specific
development/redevelopment areas. They each have their own challenges.
Consensus was to provide the Council with multiple tools (scenarios) with the next development
submission.
7. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the 2013 update of the City
Council's Strategic Plan.
This item did not require further discussion (see minutes from January 28, 2013).
8. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the development of the Lick
Creek Park Nature Center.
This item did not require further discussion (see minutes from January 28, 2013).
9. Presentation, possible action, and discussion on options for the future of the Conference
Center facility and operations. J
This item did not require further discussion (see minutes from January 28, 2013).
10. Presentation, recap and discussion regarding next steps.
Bob Cowell, Executive Director of Planning and Development Services, reviewed the Council's
direction from yesterday's meeting; to wit:
• Revise goal for financially stable city to remove "current"
• Under core services add additional PD strategies - need to talk through what these are
Revise continued support of agencies engaged in community programs and strike specific
programs and add "when they demonstrate good stewardship of public funds Revise
Neighborhood Integrity to reflect that we work with HOA's and NA's to address specific
neighborhood issues /concerns Revise Neighborhood Integrity goal to add "safe"
• Revise diverse growing economy strategy on incompatible encroachments add "medical
district"
• Revise strategy with tourism to add "support & diversification"
• Add "Support diversification and expansion of non - consumer economy - business to
business"
• Revise strategy talking about diversification efforts focused on job growth versus just
biotech Add strategy on supporting private delivery of broadband tech - need language
from James Benham For Improving Mobility revise second strategy to add promoting
-.04)
RTRT012913 Minutes Page 4
"safe" walkability and remove reference to sidewalks, short block length, and
landscaping
• Possible new initiative, revised mission, or incorporation into multiple initiatives
regarding good governance - responsive, accountable, transparent, effective, efficient,
etc. with strategies such as strategic planning, community surveys, etc.
Staff will consolidate /refine the direction given at yesterday's meeting. There will be further
discussion on unresolved items, if necessary. The finalized Plan will be presented to Council for
adoption, possibly in March. Department service plans will also be presented. The budget/mid-
year review will be May -July. Performance measure reports will be provided to the Council
quarterly.
Mayor Berry asked Council to provide an evaluation of the retreat to the City Manager or City
Secretary.
11. Adiournment
MOTION: There being no further business, Mayor Berry adjourned the Retreat of the College
Station City Council at 1:01 p.m. on Tuesday, January 29, 2013.
Nancy Be ,Mayor
ATTEST:
A s k
Sherry M. 4' burn, City Secretary
L
RTRT012913 Minutes Page 5