HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/11/2025 - Regular Minutes - City CouncilMINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
IN -PERSON WITH TELECONFERENCE PARTICIPATION
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
SEPTEMBER 11, 2025
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF BRAZOS
Present:
John Nichols, Mayor
Council:
Mark Smith, Mayor ProTem
William Wright
David White
Melissa McIlhaney
Bob Yancy
Scott Shafer
Citv Staff:
Jeff Capps, Deputy City Manager
Jeff Kersten, Assistant City Manager
Adam Falco, City Attorney
Leslie Whitten, Deputy City Attorney
Tanya Smith, City Secretary
Kim Dickey, Records Management Administrator
1. Call to Order and Announce a Ouorum is Present.
With a quorum present, the meeting of the College Station City Council was called to order by Mayor
Nichols via In -Person and Teleconference at 4:00 p.m. on September 11, 2025, in the Council
Chambers of the City of College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas 77840.
2. Executive Session Agenda.
In accordance with the Texas Government Code §551.07 1 -Consultation with Attorney, §551.072-Real
Estate, §551.074-Personnel, §551.086-Competitive Matters and §551.087-Economic Incentive
Negotiations, and the College Station City Council convened into Executive Session at 4:01 p.m. on
September 11, 2025, to continue discussing matters pertaining to:
2.1. Consultation with Attornev to seek advice regarding pending or contemplated litigation, to
wit:
• Shana Elliott and Lawrence Kalke v. City of College Station, et al., Cause No. 22-001122-CV-
85, in the 85th District Court, Brazos County, Texas; and
• The City of College Station v. The Public Utility Commission of Texas, Cause No. D-1-GN-
24-005680 in the 200th District Court, Travis County, Texas; and
• Legal advice related to the Texas Open Meetings Act.
2.2. Deliberation on the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property; to wit:
CCM 091125 Minutes Page 1
• Approximately 300 acres generally located at Corporate Parkway and Midtown Drive in the
Midtown Business Park.
2.3. Deliberation on the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline,
or dismissal of a public officer; to wit:
• Council Self -Evaluation
2.4. Deliberation on a competitive matter as that term is defined in Gov't Code Section 552.133;
to wit:
• Power Supply
2.5. Deliberation on an offer of financial or other incentives for a business prospect that the
Council seeks to have locate, stay or expand in or near the City; to wit:
• Economic development agreement with Corinth Group, Inc.
3. The Open Meeting Will Reconvene No Earlier than 6:00 PM from Executive Session and City
Council will take action, if any.
Executive Session recessed at 6:05 p.m.
4. Pledge of Allegiance, Invocation, consider absence request.
Invocation given by College Station Police Department Rev. Ben Hailey.
5. PRESENTATION - PROCLAMATIONS, AWARDS, AND RECOGNITIONS.
5.1. Presentation proclaiming September 17th through 23rd as "Constitution Week."
Mayor Nichols presented a proclamation to the La Villita Chapter Daughters of the American
Revolution declaring September 17-23, 2025, as "Constitution Week."
6. Hear Visitors Comments.
Chuck Elliott, College Station stated that SB 1567 has led to more trash, speeding cars, and noise,
affecting peace and safety. Fred Dupree previously highlighted poor enforcement of occupancy rules
and suggested checking cars before 7:30 AM, but no changes were made. With SB 1567, enforcement
is now focused on safety, though challenges remain and effective enforcement is essential to uphold
standards. Mr. Elliott explained that protecting community character should be a priority, and city
staff must consider citizen input.
Ansley Brent, from College Station, raised concerns about the city's contract transparency, feeling it
is lacking. She pointed out that the one -week notice for meetings is insufficient for community
members with hourly jobs, who need two weeks' notice to attend. This short notice also limits
community members' ability to file Freedom of Information requests, which take ten days. Ms. Brent
asked Council Member Wright if the same notice would apply to a nuclear power plant proposal, and
he confirmed it would. She believes the community needs more time to organize, research, and
communicate with representatives.
7. CONSENT ITEMS
CCM 091125 Minutes Page 2
Presentation, discussion, and possible action on consent items which consist of ministerial, or
"housekeeping" items as allowed by law: A Councilmember may request additional information
at this time. Anv Councilmember may remove an item from the Consent Agenda for a separate
vote.
Items (7.4) and (7.8) were pulled by the Council for clarification.
(7.4) Ross Brady, Chief of Staff, stated that the last rate increase for Atmos was around this time last
year. Annual increases do not always occur, but when they do, they must be approved by September
30th. This year, 181 cities are involved, totaling $205 million, with a higher per -person increase than
last year's $9. The $200 million figure applies to all Atmos customers, not just city residents.
(7.8) Michael Ostrowski, Chief Development Officer, explained that the contract will remain
unchanged except for an extension. The contract includes an option for the property to remove the
back portion within 180 days of phase one's first building occupancy, with a $50,000 fee. He stated
that negotiations are progressing after recent discussions with the Economic Development Committee.
It is anticipated that the development agreement will be finalized in 60 to 90 days.
7.1. Presentation, discussion, and possible action of minutes for:
• August 28, 2025 Council Meeting
7.2. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on Resolution No. 09-11-25-7.2 regarding the
Citv's investment volicv, reviewing and recording changes to the volicv and strategv, and on a
collateral volicv, and designating investment officers for the fiscal vear ending September 30,
2026, stating that the Citv Council has reviewed and approved the Citv's investment volicv,
broker -dealer list and investment strategv.
7.3. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding Ordinance No. 2025-4616 amending
Chapter 38 "Traffic and Vehicles", Article VI "Traffic Schedules", Section 38-1008 "Traffic
Schedule VIII, No Right Turn and No Left Turn", to add No Left Turn sign on Edelweiss
Avenue.
7.4. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on approval of the Atmos Mid -Tex 2025 Rate
Review Mechanism (RRM) Settlement and Rate Ordinance No. 2025-4617.
7.5. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an Interlocal Agreement with the
Citv of Brvan for the management of the Larry J. Ringer Librarv.
7.6. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a contract with Milsoft Utilitv Solutions, Inc
for Electric Line Design/Staking and a Work Order Software Svstem to replace the existing
software systems in the one-time amount of $301,000 and an annual recurring cost of $111,300.
7.7. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a three-vear contract with AESI-US, Inc.
not to exceed $356,129 for North American Electric Reliabilitv Corporation (NERC) compliance
consulting.
7.8. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on approval of an agreement with Virginia
Transformer Corporation for the purchase and installation of an electric substation power
transformer at the Northwest Substation, not to exceed $2,337,317.
CCM 091125 Minutes Page 3
7.9. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on bid awards to KBS Electrical Distributors
for $1,342,774 and Intellouic Engineering, Inc. for $16,200 for the purchase of Single Phase and
Three Phase Electric Transformers for Electric Warehouse Inventorv. Total awards not to
exceed $1,358,974.
7.10. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a signal interconnect agreement with
Union Pacific Railroad Company for the FM 2154 and John Kimbrough traffic signal.
7.11. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a signal interconnect agreement with
Union Pacific Railroad Comoanv for the FM 2154 and Old Main traffic signal.
7.12. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on Contract Amendment No. 1 with Corn's
Collision Center, Inc., to authorize the expenditure of additional funds for hailstorm and
weather -related damage repairs to Citv-owned vehicles, not -to -exceed $395,000.
7.13. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a construction contract with Brazos
Paving, Inc., in the amount of $4,305,576.94 for the rehabilitation of William D. Fitch Parkwav
from Tonkawav Lake Drive to Rock Prairie Road, plus the Citv's contingencv in the amount of
$430,557.69, for a total appropriation of $4.736,134.63. Approval of this item grants authoritv
for the Citv Manager to authorize oroiect expenditures up to the Citv's contingencv amount.
7.14. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a construction contract with American
Generator Services NA, LLC. in the amount of $153,515.75 for the replacement of the generator
at Fire Station 1 and the Utilities Customer Service building.
7.15. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on the purchase of three 600-horsepower
water well motors from Integrated Power Services LLC for $233,662.20.
7.16. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on approving the annual purchase of chlorine
gas and sodium hvpochlorite from PVS DX, Inc. Based on current unit pricing, the estimated
annual expenditure for both items is $448,880.
7.17. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on an Oversized Participation Agreement
with Boardwalk Estates, LLC and Site Utilities and Construction, LLC for an amount not to
exceed $165,991 for the construction of a water line along portions of Richards Street, Sterling
Street, and Crest Street.
7.18. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an amendment to the real estate
contract with The Corinth Group, Inc.
MOTION: Upon a motion made by Councilmember Yancy and a second by Councilmember
Mcllhaney, the City Council voted seven (7) for and none (0) opposed, to approve the Consent agenda.
The motion carried unanimously.
8. WORKSHOP ITEMS — (8.1 through 8.3 pulled to future agenda)
8.1. Presentation, discussion, and possible action related to a Water Services Department annual
update.
8.2. Presentation, discussion, and possible action related to an Electric Department annual
update.
CCM 091125 Minutes Page 4
8.3. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the Citv's new external website
(cstx.gov), which was scheduled to launch on Tuesday. Sent. 9.
9. REGULAR ITEMS
Regular Item No. 9.5 was presented P.
9.1. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding Ordinance No. 2025-
4618 on Budget Amendment 3 amending Ordinance No. 2024-4539 which will amend the budget
for the 2024-2025 Fiscal Year in the amount of $774,978.
Michael DeHaven, Assistant Finance Director, stated that the proposed budget amendment aims to
increase the FY25 appropriations by $744,978. This is mainly for Police department grants and
additional IT replacements due to aging equipment. Approval is also requested for using working
capital from the Property Casualty and Fleet Maintenance Fund for vehicle damage from the March
2025 hailstorm and further fleet repairs. These uses do not increase the budget. The amendment
includes an interfund transfer from Hotel Tax Fund to General Fund for the USA Track & Field event,
which does not affect the net budget amount. If approved, the revised 2024-2025 budget
appropriations will be $559,290,088.
SUMMARY OF BUDGET AMENDMENT #3
Amount
2.1,072
151,281
20,625
552,000
S 774,978
Amount
200,000
150,000
5 350,000
�- Fund Amount
HOT W General Fund for USA Track and Field expenses HOT to General 135,742
"" Working Capital Uses and Interfund Transfer Items have no impact on the budget
REVISED NET BUDGET SUMMARY
Approved Budget $ 541,450,694
Budget Amendment #1 14,718,759
Budget Amendment #2 2,375,667
Budget Amendment #3 774,978
Revised Budget S 559,290,088
Required Council Actions
Hold the Public Hearing
Consider Ordinance and Budget Amount
• Approve two Working Capital Uses
Approve one Interfund Transfer
CCM 091125 Minutes Page 5
At approximately 12:11 p.m., Mayor Nichols opened the Public Hearing.
There being no further comments, the Public Hearing was closed at 12:11 p.m.
MOTION: Upon a motion made by Councilmember Smith and a second by Councilmember Wright,
the City Council voted seven (7) for and none (0) opposed, to adopt Ordinance No. 2025-4618, Budget
Amendment 3 amending Ordinance No. 2024-4539 which will amend the budget for the 2024-2025
Fiscal Year in the amount of $774,978. The motion carried unanimously.
9.2. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding Ordinance No. 2025-
4619 amending Appendix A. Unified Development Ordinance, Article 11 "Definitions", Section
11.2 "Defined Terms" of the Code of Ordinances of the Citv of College Station, Texas, by
amending certain sections regarding the definition of familv.
Regular Items 9.2 and 9.3 were presented together.
9.3. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding Ordinance No. 2025-
4620 amending Appendix A. Unified Development Ordinance, Article 1 "General Provisions",
Section 1.10 "Transitional Provisions," Article 3 "Development Review Procedures", Section 3.4
"Official Zoning Map Amendments (Rezonings)," Article 4 "Zoning Districts", Section 4.1
"Establishment of Districts," Article 5 "District Purpose Statements and Supplemental
Standards", Section 5.10 "Overlav Districts" and Section 5.11 "Single-Familv Overlav
Districts," and Article 6 "Use Regulations", Section 6.3 "Twes of Use" of the Code of
Ordinances of the Citv of College Station, Texas, by amending certain sections regarding the
ROO Restricted Occupancv Overlav zoning district and HOO High Occupancv Overlav zoning
district.
Heather Wade from Planning and Development announced that, effective September 1, 2025, Senate
Bill 1567 (SB 1567) will stop Texas cities from regulating home occupancy based on relationships.
The City will amend zoning rules, removing ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay and HOO High
Occupancy Overlay districts. This step updates the UDO definition of "family." The first phase will
amend UDO sections related to these overlays, followed by rezoning properties without these overlays
starting in September.
Item 5.1 — Definition of Family in UDO
• Proposed amendment to the definition of family
Family: A family is any number of persons occupying a single dwelling unit. The term family
shall not be construed to mean a club, a lodge, or a fraternity or sorority house.
Item 5.2 — Sections Related to Occupancy Overlays in UDO
• Proposed amendments to relevant sections:
o Article 1 "General Provisions", Section 1.10 "Transitional Provisions,"
o Article 3 "Development Review Procedures", Section 3.4 "Official Zoning Map Amendments
(Rezonings),"
o Article 4 "Zoning Districts", Section 4.1 "Establishment of Districts,"
o Article 5 "District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards", Section 5.10 "Overlay
Districts" and Section 5.11 "Single -Family Overlay Districts,"
o Article 6 "Use Regulations", Section 6.3 "Types of Use."
CCM 091125 Minutes Page 6
Staff recommend approval of the amendment to the Unified Development Ordinance to comply with
Senate Bill 1567, which prohibits the regulation of occupancy based on familial or relationship status.
At approximately 12:25 p.m., Mayor Nichols opened the Public Hearing.
Fred Dupriest from College Station proposed that the definition of "family" should be universal, not
just for occupancy. He recommended continuing the current non -enforcement and reviewing all uses
of "family" in key documents like the UDO, Comprehensive Plan, and CBDG programs to ensure the
definition is clear and assess legal liabilities. Mr. Dupriest requested Council to consider defining a
family as any number of people living together in a single dwelling unit, related by various means, or
as part of a group home for disabled persons.
There being no further comments, the Public Hearing was closed at 12:40 p.m.
(9.2) MOTION: Upon a motion made by Councilmember McIlhaney and a second by
Councilmember Wright, the City Council voted seven (7) for and none (0) opposed, to adopt
Ordinance No. 2025-4619, amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 11
"Definitions", Section 11.2 "Defined Terms" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station,
Texas, by amending certain sections regarding the definition of family. The motion carried
unanimously.
(9.3) MOTION: Upon a motion made by Councilmember Wright and a second by Councilmember
Smith, the City Council voted seven (7) for and none (0) opposed, to adopt Ordinance No. 2025-4620,
amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 1 "General Provisions", Section 1.10
"Transitional Provisions," Article 3 "Development Review Procedures", Section 3.4 "Official Zoning
Map Amendments (Rezonings)," Article 4 "Zoning Districts", Section 4.1 "Establishment of
Districts," Article 5 "District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards", Section 5.10
"Overlay Districts" and Section 5.11 "Single -Family Overlay Districts," and Article 6 "Use
Regulations", Section 6.3 "Types of Use" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station,
Texas, by amending certain sections regarding the ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay zoning district
and HOO High Occupancy Overlay zoning district. The motion carried unanimously.
9.4. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a third amendment to the Construction
Manager at Risk (CMAR) Contract with Garnev Construction, Inc. accepting the Guaranteed
Maximum Price No. 3 (GMP No. 3) of $9,466,684.15 for the materials procurement packages
for the Wells 10,11 and 12 project, plus the Citv's continuncv in the amount of $946,668.42 for
a total appropriation of $10,413,352.57.
Stephen Maldonado, Assistant Director of Water, mentioned this is the third amendment to the
contract with Gamey Construction. It covers procuring pipe materials, valves, generators, and fuel
tanks for designing and constructing three new water wells and a collection line. Each well will pump
3,300 GPM using a Motor Control Cabinet, Variable Frequency drive, and backup generator. Mr.
Maldonado explained that the project also includes building internal roads, power distribution, and a
12,000-foot collection line to Sandy Point Road. Coordination with BTU, Union Pacific, TXDOT,
and land acquisition are also required.
MOTION: Upon a motion made by Councilmember Yancy and a second by Councilmember Shafer,
the City Council voted seven (7) for and none (0) opposed, to approve the third amendment to the
Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) Contract with Gamey Construction, Inc. accepting the
Guaranteed Maximum Price No. 3 (GMP No. 3) of $9,466,684.15 for the materials procurement
CCM 091125 Minutes Page 7
packages for the Wells 10,11 and 12 project, plus the City's contingency in the amount of $946,668.42
for a total appropriation of $10,413,352.57. The motion carried unanimously.
9.5. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a real estate contract with Prioritv
Power Management, LLC for the sale of approximately 200 acres of land in the Midtown
Business Park at the intersection of Midtown Drive and Corporate Parkwav in the amount of
$150,000 per acre. The final square footage of the property and the City's remaining property,
if anv, will be identified on the approved replat. (Presented this item 119
Michael Ostrowski, Chief Development Officer, stated that The City of College Station owns roughly
300 acres of land east of Corporate Parkway's terminus at Midtown Drive. About 200 acres are
developable, with the rest being natural areas. This M-1 Light Industrial -zoned property will become
the Midtown Business Park, allowing various uses like manufacturing and storage. Priority Power
Management LLC has proposed buying all developable acres for a data center project, contingent on
securing sufficient power. Founded in 2001 and based in Texas, Priority Power is an energy
management firm serving over 8,500 clients. The city has had this property for sale for years, but its
limited access and utilities have hindered sales compared to other parks like the College Station
Business Center. Extending Corporate Parkway through the site would cost $25-$30 million, but if
the data center project proceeds, this extension may not be necessary as it wouldn't generate much
traffic. Mr. Ostrowski emphasized that a power supply study is necessary before finalizing the project
details and scope. Benefits for the city include land sales revenue, ongoing tax revenue, and
infrastructure savings, but noise, power, and water concerns need addressing. A large vegetative
buffer, further studies, and agreements can help mitigate these issues. A site map shows boundaries,
residential distances, and a potential 600MW facility with two two-story buildings but building sizes
will adjust based on electrical capacity post -study.
Project
• 2-3 story data center project in Midtown Business Park; could be multiple data centers based
on power capacity
• Will design around power capacity — power study needed
• $144 billion in capital expenditures
• Jobs — 45 FTE, 2,500 construction
• Timeline — due diligence is 6-14 months, construction is 18 months
Concerns
• Noise
o Required sound study
o Noise ordinance, 63/56 decibels
o Vegetative buffer (600-900 feet)
o Increased setbacks
• Power
o Additional agreement
• Water
o Additional agreement
Potential Options
1. Approve as presented: This option still requires additional agreements for power and water, as
well as a sound study.
2. Approve with amendments: This option allows for modifications to the proposal.
3. Deny: This option rejects the proposal.
4. Postpone for future consideration: This option postpones the decision to a future meeting to gather
more public input and address any questions.
CCM 091125 Minutes Page 8
Mayor Nichols opened for Citizen Comments.
Robert Rose, College Station, discussed the numerous uncertainties regarding this large project,
stating there has not been enough time to fully understand its implications. He emphasized that
historically, the council's guiding principle has been the health and safety of College Station residents.
Therefore, Mr. Rose urges a -no vote on this project due to the many unknowns prioritizing what is
best for the community's wellbeing.
Kati Stoddard, College Station, shared her concerns about a new proposal due to the potential energy
strains and pollution related to fossil fuels. She's also worried about generator emissions and noise
near residential areas, daycares, schools, and a planned $21 million park. Ms. Stoddard questioned the
community benefits of the project and urged the rejection of the proposal for better alternatives.
Commissioner Fred Brown, College Station, addressed the Council, acknowledging the difficulty of
their decision. He expressed concern about the project's location, emphasizing its potential negative
impact on first-time home buyers in the area and property values. Additionally, Commissioner Brown
highlighted uncertainties regarding power and water usage that could affect the entire county. He
urged the Council to make the right decision and thanked them for their leadership. When asked if
these concerns would apply no matter where the project is located in the county, he affirmed they
would.
Shelby Behm, College Station, expressed concerns to the Council about a potential data center in
Midtown. After visiting a similar facility in Schneider, Texas, she felt the city abandoned its promise
of a neighborhood with recreational and commercial amenities. She disapproved of the lack of city
support and accountability, suggesting undue pressure on developer James Murr. Mrs. Behm
highlighted community opposition to the data center and urged the Council to uphold their original
vision for Midtown, that benefits residents.
Jeffery Hughes, President of College Station's HOA, raised concerns about the high energy
consumption (200-300 MW), noise, electromagnetic fields, and potential health risks related to the
project. He stressed that past city actions have eroded trust, questioned the integrity of the decision -
making process, and warned that approval would harm residents' quality of life and further diminish
trust in city leaders.
Jeffery Herring, College Station, expressed concerns about the poor timing of the proposal, stating
that the community was given only four days to respond. He emphasized distrust in decision -makers
due to this short notice. He strongly opposed the project in their neighborhoods, citing its disruptive
impact. Mr. Herring argued this specific development is unsuitable for the area. He concluded by
reiterating the community's opposition to the project.
James Murr from College Station has expressed concerns regarding the city's deviation from the
original Midtown vision. He noted that development plans now include a data center which will
provide only 45 jobs on land originally intended to support thousands of jobs and foster community
engagement. Mr. Murr highlighted that the Midtown plan initially called for significant infrastructure
investments and public -private partnerships. He further observed that collaborative efforts led by the
city are not reflected in current planning documents. He believes that the city has abandoned this
vision, leaving him to pursue it independently.
Citizens expressed their opposition to the real estate contract with Priority Power Management, LLC
for the sale of approximately 200 acres of land in the Midtown Business Park at the intersection of
Midtown Drive and Corporate Parkway. The concerns cited include distrust, pollution, noise, safety,
CCM 091125 Minutes Page 9
long-term implications, potential tax increases, water and power supply, health issues, decreased
property values, family impact, infrastructure strain, limited economic benefits, environmental
problems, loss of rights, negative effects on growth and revenue, and diminished quality of life:
• Lloyd Davis
•
Timothy Regetz
•
Jodi Warner
• Noor Shaikh
•
James Murr
•
Wendy Letendre
• Ansley Brent
•
Jobi Brock
•
Amy Alge
• Jeff Braun
•
Laura Rosenau
•
Vicki Brent
• Matthew McGarr
•
Mariana Feldman
•
Stacey Nehring
• Valen Cepak
•
Robert Grande
•
DJ Kwiatkowski
• Brian Worth
•
Travis Vollmering
•
Courtney Cannon
• Nancy Hefner
•
Carlos Candia
•
Kip Gilts
• Amber Schafnitz-
•
Carson McCain
•
Bob Brick
Sherman
•
Warren Reichel
•
Blanche Brick
• Nic Graham
•
James Distefano
• Steve Martin
•
Janet Handley
Mayor Nichols recessed the meeting at 9:54 p.m.
The meeting was reconvened at 10:04 p.m.
Dennis Maloney, College Station, spoke about his past work on Council revising zoning maps for
long-term growth. He highlighted securing land for a future business park, introducing the medical
corridor, and Spring Creek business park with a "live, work, play" approach. Mr. Maloney urged
maintaining this vision and avoiding large land tracts going to a single developer to ensure balanced
development.
Additional citizens who expressed opposition to the real estate contract include:
• John N. Newell
•
Stacy Dieffenbach
•
William Giles
• Jen Zweiacker
•
Tracey S. Hodges
•
Travis Scott
• Heath Shannon
•
Patrick Hoang
•
Justin Walther
• James Rodgers
•
Lisa Cadena Craig
•
Bob Achgill
• David Moody
•
Jadyn Warner
•
Courtney E. Bartlett
• Craig York
•
Tyler Pierce
•
David Inbody
• Thomas Behne
•
Dylon Edmunds
•
Chris Conrey
• Peter Bastian
•
Alexandra Powell
•
Lauren Youngblood
• Shawnee Chavez
•
Amy Friese
•
Tanya Geffert
• Kyle Eubank
•
Nathan Ezell
•
& 108 Written Comments
There being no further comments, Citizen Comments was closed.
MOTION: Upon a motion made by Councilmember McIlhaney and a second by Councilmember
White, the City Council voted seven (7) for and none (0) opposed, to deny a real estate contract with
Priority Power Management, LLC for the sale of approximately 200 acres of land in the Midtown
Business Park at the intersection of Midtown Drive and Corporate Parkway in the amount of $150,000
per acre. The final square footage of the property and the City's remaining property, if any, will be
identified on the approved replat. The motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Nichols recessed the meeting at 11:58 p.m.
The meeting was reconvened at 12:07 a.m.
CCM 091125 Minutes Page 10
10. Items of Communitv Interest and Council Calendar: The Council may discuss upcoming
events and receive reports from a Council Member or Citv Staff about items of community
interest for which notice has not been given, including: expressions of thanks, congratulations
or condolence, information regarding holidav schedules, honorary or salutary recognitions of a
public official, public employee, or other citizen, reminders of upcoming events organized or
sponsored by the Citv of College Station, information about a social, ceremonial or community
event organized or sponsored by an entity other than the City of College Station that is scheduled
to be attended by a Council Member, another citv official or staff of the Citv of College Station;
and announcements involving an imminent threat to the public health and safety of people in
the Citv of College Station that has arisen after the posting of the agenda.
Mayor Nichols announced the upcoming public meeting on September 30th, which will gather
feedback on potential overnight parking restrictions.
11. Council Reports on Committees, Boards, and Commission: A Council Member may make a
report regarding meetings of Citv Council boards and commissions or meetings of boards and
committees on which a Council Member serves as a representative that have met since the last
council meeting. (Committees listed in Coversheet)
Councilmember Wright reported on the Legislative Engagement Committee.
Councilmember Shafer reported on the Bicycle, Pedestrian and Greenway Board.
12. Future Agenda Items and Review of Standing List of Council Generated Future Agenda
Items: A Council Member may make a request to Citv Council to place an item for which no
notice has been given on a future agenda or may inquire about the status of an item on the
standing list of council generated future agenda items. A Council Member's or Citv Staff's
response to the request or inquiry will be limited to a statement of specific factual information
related to the request or inquiry or the recitation of existing policv in response to the request or
inquirv. Anv deliberation of or decision about the subiect of a request will be limited to a
proposal to place the subiect on the agenda for a subsequent meeting.
Councilmember White request a workshop item on the definition of "family."
Councilmember Mcllhaney requested a workshop to discuss types of plans for the Midtown Business
Park area.
13. Adiournment.
There being no further business, Mayor Nichols adjourned the meeting of the City Council at 1:02
a.m. on Friday, September 12, 2025.
?P v
P. Mayor
ATTEST:
Tanya Smith, City Secretary
CCM 091125 Minutes Page 11