HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/03/2025 - Regular Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning Commission
College Station, TX
Meeting Agenda
Planning and Zoning Commission
1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, TX 77840
Internet: www.microsoft.com/microsoft-teams/join-a-meeting
Meeting ID: 242 663 945 277 | Passcode: ov9Sa9Ed
Phone: 833-240-7855 | Phone Conference ID: 960 422 366#
The City Council may or may not attend this meeting.
April 3, 2025 6:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers
College Station, TX Page 1
Notice is hereby given that a quorum of the meeting body will be present in the physical location
stated above where citizens may also attend in order to view a member(s) participating by
videoconference call as allowed by 551.127, Texas Government Code. The City uses a third-
party vendor to host the virtual portion of the meeting; if virtual access is unavailable, meeting
access and participation will be in-person only.
1. Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request.
2. Hear Visitors
At this time, the Chairperson will open the floor to visitors wishing to address the Commission on issues
not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The visitor presentations will be limited to three minutes in
order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time
for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look
into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the
meeting; please give your name and address for the record.)
3. Consent Agenda
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Commission and will be
enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans and final plats, where staff has found
compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with
any and all staff recommendations. Since there will not be separate discussion of these items, citizens
wishing to address the Commission regarding one or more items on the Consent Agenda may address
the Commission at this time as well. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent
Agenda it may be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration.
3.1. Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes:
Attachments: 1. March 6 2025
4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent
Agenda by Commission action.
5. Regular Agenda
5.1. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the 2024 College Station Existing
Conditions Report.
Sponsors: Heather Wade
Attachments: 1. 2024 Existing Conditions Report
Page 1 of 108
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 2 April 3, 2025
5.2. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding Planning & Zoning commissioners'
feedback to staff for inclusion in the 2025 Comprehensive Plan 5-Year Evaluation & Appraisal
Report.
Sponsors: Christine Leal
Attachments: 1. Evaluation Questionnaire
6. Informational Agenda
6.1. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City.
New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev
6.2. Presentation and discussion regarding an update on items heard:
• A rezoning of approximately two acres of land located at 101, 103, 105, 107, 109, and 110-
119 Knox Drive from PDD Planned Development District to MH Middle Housing and HOO
High Occupancy Overlay. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on March 6,
2025 and voted (5-2) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on March
27, 2025 and voted (4-1-1) to approve the request.
• A rezoning of approximately .4 of an acre of land located at 418, 420, 422, 424, and 426
Baby Bear Drive from PDD Planned Development District to MH Middle Housing and HOO
High Occupancy Overlay. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on March 6,
2025 and voted (5-2) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on March
27, 2025 and voted (4-1-1) to approve the request.
• A rezoning of approximately .4 of an acre of land located at 133, 135, 137, 139, and 141
Deacon Drive West from PDD Planned Development District to MH Middle Housing and
HOO High Occupancy Overlay. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on
March 6, 2025 and voted (5-2) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item
on March 27, 2025 and voted (4-1-1) to approve the request.
6.3. Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings:
• Thursday, April 10, 2025 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 6:00
p.m.
• Tuesday, April 15, 2025 ~ Northgate Small Area Plan Committee Meeting ~ Council
Chambers ~ 3:00 p.m.
• Thursday, April 17, 2025 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m.
• Thursday, April 24, 2025 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 6:00
p.m.
• Thursday, May 1, 2025 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m.
6.4. Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board and BioCorridor
Board.
• None
7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items.
A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A
statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any
deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
Page 2 of 108
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 3 April 3, 2025
8. Adjourn.
The Planning and Zoning Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed
on the agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion.
I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the website and at College Station City Hall,
1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on March 31, 2025 at 5:00 p.m.
City Secretary
This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting
and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters,
readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD
at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the
meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification
at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to
provide the necessary accommodations.
Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun.
"Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly
Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411,
Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a
Handgun that is Carried Openly."
Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia.
“Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al aire
libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411,
Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad
portando arma de mano al aire libre.”
Page 3 of 108
March 6, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 7
Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission
Regular Meeting March 6, 2025
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairperson Jason Cornelius, Commissioners Aron Collins,
Marcus Chaloupka, Warren Finch, David Higdon, Michael Buckley, and Tre Watson
COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmember David White CITY STAFF PRESENT: Assistant Director of Planning & Development Services Molly
Hitchcock, Long Range Planning Administrator Christine Leal, Land Development Review
Administrator Robin Macias, Senior Planner Jeff Howell, Deputy City Attorney Leslie Whitten, Administrative Support Specialist Kristen Hejny, and Lead Technology Services Specialist Lillian Wells
1. Call Meeting to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request.
Chairperson Cornelius called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
2. Hear Visitors
No visitors spoke.
3. Consent Agenda
3.1 Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes.
• February 20, 2025
Commissioner Collins moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Commissioner Chaloupka seconded the motion, the motion passed 7-0. 4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent
Agenda by Commission Action.
No items were removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. 5. Regular Agenda
5.1 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from PDD Planned Development District to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately
1.152 acres at 101, 103, 105, 107, 109, and 110-119 Knox Drive, being Lots 18-27, Block
Page 4 of 108
March 6, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 7
29 and Lots 12-16, Block 31 of The Barracks II Subdivision Phase 401, generally located southwest of the intersection of Knox Drive and Old Wellborn Road. Case #REZ2024-
000030.
5.2 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College
Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from PDD Planned Development
District to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 0.412 acres at 418, 420, 422, 424, and 426 Baby Bear Drive, being Lots 1-5, Block 32 of The Barracks II Subdivision Phase 109, generally located northeast of the intersection of Baby Bear Drive and Towers Parkway.
5.3 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from PDD Planned Development
District to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately
0.406 acres at 133, 135, 137, 139, and 141 Deacon Drive West, being Lots 1-5, Block 21 of The Barracks II Subdivision Phase 107, generally located northeast of the intersection of Deacon Drive West and General Parkway.
Presentations, discussion, and public hearings on agenda items #5.1, #5.2, and #5.3 were
held together. Senior Planner Howell presented the rezoning requests for agenda items #5.1, #5.2, and #5.3 recommending approval of all.
Commissioner Collins asked why only these certain areas were being rezoned. Senior Planner Howell clarified that these applications were submitted by the individual property owners as they were not part of the City-initiated rezoning to middle housing since
they are zoned as PDD Planned Development District.
Commissioner Collins asked if this area could be a future candidate for City-initiated rezoning.
Senior Planner Howell clarified that this area could potentially be part of a larger scale
City-initiated rezoning. Commissioner Collins asked if townhouse developments can be built within a MH Middle Housing zoning district.
Senior Planner Howell confirmed that townhouse developments can be built within a MH Middle Housing zoning district.
Page 5 of 108
March 6, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 7
Commissioner Higdon asked for clarification on the definition of shared housing.
Senior Planner Howell clarified that a shared housing use allows for occupancy beyond
that of a family. Commissioner Higdon asked if this would create a restricted housing adjacent to shared housing.
Senior Planner Howell clarified that if a shared housing use was established through a minor site plan process, a restricted housing would be adjacent to a shared housing product.
Commissioner Collins asked if staff sees any concerns with putting a high occupancy use
adjacent to a single-family use. Senior Planner Howell clarified that the PDD Planned Development District zoning district did provide for modifications to the setbacks which is in line with a MH Middle Housing
zoning district, other properties in the area could also apply for the HOO High Occupancy
Overlay. Commissioner Chaloupka asked if the City sees any issues with rezoning certain areas within a larger area, asking if it would lead to a City-initiated rezoning in the future.
Chairperson Cornelius added that the Commission sees an issue with smaller area rezonings because of the individual property ownership. Senior Planner Howell clarified that additional adjacent common ownerships could request
a rezoning; these specific areas are commonly owned within a larger area. Mr. Howell also
clarified that a larger-scale rezoning could be pursued at the direction of the City Council and explained that the methodology of the working group for the City-initiated rezonings excluded PDD Planned Development Districts.
Commissioner Finch asked for the bedroom count within the townhomes.
Senior Planner Howell deferred to the applicant regarding a bedroom count. Commissioner Watson asked for clarification that the City requires a majority vote from a
subdivision for a ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay, however the City does not require
neighborhood approval for a HOO High Occupancy Overlay. Senior Planner Howell confirmed that approval from the neighborhood for a HOO High Occupancy Overlay through the shared housing use is not required.
Page 6 of 108
March 6, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 7
Commissioner Higdon stated that property owners in the subdivision purchased homes in a single-family area, asking if the HOO High Occupancy Overlay would change the
dynamic throughout the development.
Senior Planner Howell clarified that to gain the shared housing use, the applicant would have to go through the minor site plan process, adding that if parking and bedroom ratios were not met, a shared housing use would not be allowed.
Commissioner Collins asked for the public hearing notification boundary. Senior Planner Howell stated that all property owners within 200-feet of the subject properties were notified of the public hearing.
Commissioner Collins asked if staff received any comments or objections on the rezonings. Senior Planner Howell confirmed that there were no inquires.
Chairperson Cornelius shared his concerns with spot zoning.
Senior Planner Howell clarified that this area is designated as mixed-residential on the Comprehensive Plan, and MH Middle Housing is an appropriate zoning district.
Commissioner Higdon asked if there is a Homeowner’s Association within the subdivision.
Senior Planner Howell confirmed there is a Homeowner’s Association, and they were notified of the public hearing.
Commissioner Higdon asked if this changes the deed restrictions.
Senior Planner Howell clarified that deed restrictions are a privately enforced matter. Ricky Flores, Applicant, Schultz Engineering, was available to address the Commission,
clarifying that a minor site plan will address the bedroom to parking ratio, and stating that
the subdivision was not included in City-initiated rezonings because of its PDD Planned Development District zoning. Chairperson Cornelius asked for clarification that most properties adjacent to the
subdivision have already been rezoned to HOO High Occupancy Overlay, stating that this
subdivision was excluded. Senior Planner Howell confirmed that there are several HOO High Occupancy Overlays and MH Middle Housing zoning districts in the area.
Commissioner Collins asked for the minimum size product in a MH Middle Housing zoning district with a HOO High Occupancy Overlay.
Page 7 of 108
March 6, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 7
Senior Planner Howell clarified that the product size depends on the product type; allowed types such as townhouse and single-family developments have their own density and
dimensional standards.
Commissioner Collins stated that a ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay limits the way you can use the property, however the HOO High Occupancy Overlay does not have the same level of restriction so it can still be used for lower density but allowing for a higher density.
Senior Planner Howell confirmed that a HOO High Occupancy Overlay does not require high occupancy. MH Middle Housing includes flexibility depending on the product type. Commissioner Higdon asked if a single property owner could pursue a HOO High
Occupancy Overly.
Senior Planner Howell clarified that a single property owner could request a HOO High Occupancy Overlay, however since these are attached units, they would have to come in together.
Administrator Macias clarified that a single property could request a HOO High Occupancy Overlay, however staff would not recommend approval as HOO High Occupancy Overlays would be placed over a larger area.
Chairperson Cornelius opened the public hearing for agenda items #5.1, #5.2, and #5.3.
No visitors spoke. Chairperson Cornelius closed the public hearing for agenda items #5.1, #5.2, and #5.3.
Commissioner Collins moved to recommend approval of agenda item #5.1, Commissioner Finch seconded the motion. Commissioner Higdon expressed concerns about a counterintuitive spot zoning nature with
the HOO High Occupancy Overlay.
Chairperson Cornelius clarified that the main reason this area was not included in the City- initiated rezoning was because of its PDD Planned Development District zoning, which were excluded from the process.
Senior Planner Howell confirmed that the area was excluded because it was part of the methodology that PDD Planned Development Districts were automatically taken off the City-initiated rezoning table.
Commissioner Chaloupka expressed concerns for spot zoning. The motion passed 5-2 with Commissioners Higdon and Buckley voting in opposition.
Page 8 of 108
March 6, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 7
Commissioner Finch moved to recommend approval of agenda item #5.2, Commissioner Chaloupka seconded the motion, the motion passed 5-2 with
Commissioners Higdon and Buckley voting in opposition. Commissioner Chaloupka moved to recommend approval of agenda item #5.3, Commissioner Collins seconded the motion.
Commissioner Watson expressed concern that HOO High Occupancy Overlays do not need
neighborhood approval like the ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlays. The motion passed 5-2 with Commissioners Higdon and Buckley voting in opposition.
6. Informational Agenda
6.1 Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City.
New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev
There was no discussion.
6.2 Presentation and discussion regarding an update on items heard:
• A comprehensive plan amendment for approximately 3.6 acres of land located at 3768 McCullough Road from Estate Residential to Neighborhood Commercial. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on February 6, 2025 and voted (7-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on February 27, 2025 and voted (6-0) to approve the request.
• A rezoning of approximately 15 acres of land located within Glenhaven Phase II Subdivision to establish a ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on February 6, 2025 and voted (7-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on February 27, 2025
and voted (6-0) to approve the request.
• A rezoning of approximately two acres of land located at 810 Southwest Parkway East from R-4 Multi-Family to GC General Commercial. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on February 6, 2025 and voted
(7-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on February 27, 2025 and voted (6-0) to approve the request.
There was no discussion.
6.3 Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings:
• Thursday, March 13, 2025 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open
Meeting 6:00 p.m.
• Tuesday, March 18, 2025 ~ Northgate Small Area Plan Committee Meeting ~ 3:00 p.m.
Page 9 of 108
March 6, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 7
• Thursday, March 20, 2025 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m.
• Thursday, March 27, 2025 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 6:00 p.m.
• Tuesday, April 1, 2025 ~ Northgate Small Area Plan Committee Meeting ~ 3:00 p.m.
• Thursday, April 3, 2025 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m.
There was no discussion.
6.4 Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board and BioCorridor Board.
• None
There was no discussion.
7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items. Chairperson Cornelius asked for a bigger view on PDD Planned Development Districts
within the City of College Station and where they could fall under future City-initiated
zoning requests. Commissioner Higdon requested that the Commission prepare a recommendation to the City Council to support efforts to retain occupancy regulations.
Commissioner Chaloupka provided updates to the Commission on the Northgate Small Area Plan meetings. Commissioner Collins commended staff on the Northgate Small Area Plan meetings.
8. Adjourn
The meeting adjourned at 6:36 p.m.
Approved: Attest:
__________________________________ _________________________________ Jason Cornelius, Chairperson Kristen Hejny, Board Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services
Page 10 of 108
April 3, 2025
Item No. 5.1.
2024 College Station Existing Conditions Report
Sponsor: Heather Wade, Principal Planner
Reviewed By CBC: N/A
Agenda Caption: Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the 2024 College Station
Existing Conditions Report.
Relationship to Strategic Goals:
• Good Governance
• Financially Sustainable City
• Core Services and Infrastructure
• Neighborhood Integrity
• Diverse Growing Economy
• Improving Mobility
• Sustainable City
Recommendation(s): Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission receive the 2024
Existing Conditions Report and provide feedback as appropriate. The City Council will receive this
update at their April 10, 2025 meeting.
Summary: As part of the development and periodic evaluation of the Comprehensive Plan, it is
important to have a foundation on which to base future expectations. The Existing Conditions Report
is updated approximately every five years to assess the changing conditions in the community and
inform future planning efforts. The 2024 Existing Conditions Report provides a snapshot of the
current conditions in College Station between 2019 and 2023.
This report includes current conditions and trends for the following key areas: local context, natural
environment, demographics, economic development, land use, public facilities, and
transportation. The city looks at these key areas holistically to determine the appropriate
expectations and direction of the Comprehensive Plan, including its implementation, monitoring, and
evaluation.
Budget & Financial Summary:
Attachments:
1. 2024 Existing Conditions Report
Page 11 of 108
EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT
Page 12 of 108
Contents
INTRODUCTION
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
DEMOGRAPHICS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
LAND USE
PUBLIC FACILITIES
TRANSPORTATION
NEXT STEPS
REFERENCES
3
7
10
27
40
56
75
91
93
Page 13 of 108
As part of the development and periodic evaluation of the Comprehensive Plan, it is important to have a
foundation on which to base future expectations. The Existing Conditions Report is updated approximately
every five years to assess the changing conditions in the community and inform future planning efforts. The
2024 Existing Conditions Report provides a snapshot of the current conditions that exist in College Station
between 2019 and 2023.
This report includes current conditions and trends for the following key areas: local context, natural
environment, demographics, economic development, land use, public facilities, and transportation. The
city looks at these key areas holistically to determine the appropriate expectations and direction of the
Comprehensive Plan, including its implementation, monitoring, and evaluation.
INTRODUCTION
3
Page 14 of 108
Location
College Station is a city in Brazos County, situated at the eastern
edge of the Central Texas region. Located in the center of the Texas
Triangle, College Station is within a three-hour drive of five of the
nation’s 20 largest cities: Houston, San Antonio, Dallas, Austin,
and Fort Worth. (Figure 1). College Station is positioned along
State Highway 6 running north and south and in near proximity
to State Highway 21 running west and east. Commuting to the
larger cities (especially the Houston and Austin metro areas) and/
or telecommuting from College Station is an increasing reality for
residents.
The City encompasses approximately 51.2 square miles and has
an Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) of 160.87 square miles. In 2018,
when the City’s population exceeded 100,000 residents, the City’s
ETJ expanded in accordance with Chapter 42 of the Texas Local Government Code. Currently, the City’s ETJ
extends five miles from the City limits, except where it abuts the City of Bryan and where the two cities have
negotiated their ETJ’s.
The City shares a portion of its northern city limit line with the City of Bryan, and together the two cities
form the core of the College Station-Bryan Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). The College Station-Bryan
MSA is made up of Brazos, Burleson, and Robertson Counties and is home to approximately 278,000
residents. It is the 14th largest MSA in Texas and ranks fifth in the state for percent change in population,
showing an 18.6% growth in population between 2012 and 2022 (Table 1).
Table 1: Population by Metropolitan Statistical Area, Texas, 2012 vs. 2022 Ranked by Percent Change; Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Population and Housing Unit Estimates Program; Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts analysis
Top 10 fastest growing Metropolitan Statistical Areas in Texas Percent Change from 2012 to 2022
Texas MSA Total Change Percent Change
Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos 586,254 32.0%
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington 1,299,166 19.6%
San Antonio-New Braunfels 418,266 18.7%
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands 1,158,391 18.7%
College Station-Bryan 43,636 18.6%
Sherman-Denison 21,265 17.4%
Killeen-Temple 72,525 17.1%
Midland 24,875 16.3%
Tyler 27,098 12.6%
Odessa 16,397 11.3%
College Station is home to the main campus of Texas A&M University, the flagship institution of the Texas
A&M University System. In the fall of 2023, 68,115 students attended the College Station campus1. Texas
A&M University is the oldest public institution of higher education in Texas, and the Texas A&M University
Foundation had over $3.2 billion dollars of endowment in 2023. The university has a triple designation as a
land, sea, and space grant institution, reflecting the broad scope of the research endeavors it brings to the
city, including ongoing projects funded by agencies such as NASA, the National Institutes of Health, the
National Science Foundation, and the Office of Naval Research.
Figure 1:The cities and counties in or near the Texas Triangle, a megaregion of the U.S. state of Texas; Source: Planning and Development Services 2024
1 Includes Distance Education students.4
Page 15 of 108
History
The City of College Station is a young municipality, with its beginnings in the founding of Texas A&M
College in 1876. Because of the school’s isolation, school administrators provided facilities for those who
were associated with the College and the campus became the focal point of community development. The
area was designated “College Station, Texas” by the Postal Service in 1877, who derived the name from
the train station located to the west of the campus. Growth of both the community and College influenced
residents’ desire to create a municipal government. The City of College Station was incorporated in 1938 as
a result of a petition by 23 men representing on and off-campus interests to the Board of Directors of Texas
A&M.
College Station witnessed growth to the north, east and south during the 1940s; however, the city’s status
as a general law city limited officials’ ability to annex territory. Without a city charter, the council could
only annex property in areas where residents petitioned for inclusion into the city limits. While the home
rule amendment from 1912 allowed Texas cities with at least 5,000 inhabitants the legal right to compose
and amend their own charters, College Station did not meet the required population threshold until the
late 1940s. The City was the first general law city in the state to employ a City Manager in the 1940s and
employed a “business manager” before that. The 1950 Census recorded College Station’s population
at 7,268, and on January 8, 1952, residents voted 220-11 to adopt a home rule charter with a council-
manager form of government. The City first adopted zoning regulations in 1940, shortly after incorporation,
to encourage orderly and desired growth of the City. The City began formal planning for growth and
development in the 1960s.
The Comprehensive Plan
The City of College Station aims to be a vibrant, forward-thinking, knowledge-based community, that
promotes the highest quality of life for its residents and visitors. City leaders, stakeholders, and staff strive
toward creating distinctive places, strong neighborhoods, a prosperous economy, engaging spaces,
integrated mobility, exceptional services, managed growth, and collaborative partnerships. This vision and
associated aspirations are laid out in the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
Figure 2: City Aspirations
5
Page 16 of 108
College Station’s third Comprehensive Plan was originally adopted in May 2009 after thousands of hours
of citizen participation. The plan covered a 20-year horizon and guided the city’s growth and development.
The 2009 Comprehensive Plan was conceived as a “living document” and recommended that the City
regularly evaluate and update the Plan as conditions change in the community.
In 2019, City leadership and staff launched the 10-year evaluation of the plan – branded The Next 10
– that engaged over 800 citizens and stakeholders across the community and culminated in the 10-
Year Evaluation & Appraisal Report. The report, officially adopted by the City Council in October 2020,
recommended modifications to the Comprehensive Plan in response to changing conditions. Throughout
2021, City staff implemented the recommended changes which included revisions to goals, policies, actions,
narrative, and maps, as well as the maps in associated master plans. The City Council adopted the updated
Comprehensive Plan in October 2021.
Recognitions and Rankings
In recent years, College Station has received many national recognitions and rankings in a variety of
economic and social categories. Since 2019, College Station has gradually risen in the ranking for many
quality-of-life metrics related to public schools, raising a family, and retirement. The City of College Station
is also recognized as a high performing organization by several national accreditation agencies. Currently
the City is among a small group of municipalities in Texas to simultaneously have national accreditations in
police, fire, public safety communications, parks and recreation, water, and public works.
The City of College Station boasts a long history of planning excellence. In 2024, the City was recognized
for the 18th year by the Richard R. Lillie FAICP Planning Excellence Program. This program recognizes
municipalities that take a wholistic approach to community planning. The City is also known for its award-
winning Comprehensive Plan, which was awarded the 2022 Comprehensive Plan Award by the Texas
Chapter of the American Planning Association and the Central Texas section of the Texas APA Chapter.
These two awards recognized the City’s Comprehensive Plan for advancing “the science and art of
planning.”
6
Page 17 of 108
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
Climate and Weather
Located about 367-feet above sea level, College Station has a subtropical and temperate climate. The
winters are mild with periods of low temperatures that usually last less than two months (Figure 3). Snow
and ice are rare, but several winter storms, including 2021 Winter Storm Uri, have changed the average
snowfall. Summers are hot and humid with the primary variation in weather being occasional rain showers
(Figure 3).
Annual high temperature 79°F
Annual low temperature 59°F
Average annual precip.40.06” inch
Figure 3: Average Temperatures and Precipitation by Month; Source: U.S. Climate Data
Average precipitation (inches) Average high (°F) Average low (°F)Temperature (°F)Precipitation (Inches)Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
3.246141
2.856544
3.177251
2.667958
4.338667
4.459273
2.149575
2.689674
3.189169
4.918160
3.227151
3.236242
7
Page 18 of 108
Soils
According to the United States
Department of Agriculture’s 2008
(spatial) and 2012 (tabular) Soil Survey
of Brazos County, Texas, its soils
are affected by post oak savannah
(creating light and sandy soil with dense
clay subsoil less than a foot under
the surface) and prairie vegetation
(creating dark loams and clays). Most
of the city is comprised of loamy soil
that has high shrink-swell, potentially
creating challenges to foundation work
necessary for urban development. Land
around the floodplains is predominantly
sandy and loamy, also impacting the
shrinking and swelling of the soil. The
floodplains consist of loamy and clayey
soils that are not considered appropriate
for urban development (See Figure 4).
052.5 Miles
BRAZOS COUNTY SOILS
ROBERTSONCOUNTY
MADISONCOUNTY
GRIMESCOUNTY
WASHINGTONCOUNTY
BURLESONCOUNTY
UPLAND SOILS
STREAM TERRACE SOILS
FLOODPLAIN SOILS
DATA SOURCE: USDA
COLLEGESTATIONCOLLEGESTATION
BRYANBRYAN
Ecoregion
College Station is in the East Central Texas Plains, also known as the Post Oak Savannah or the Texas
Claypan Area. The terrain of the Post Oak Savannah ranges from nearly flat to irregular rolling plains, and
the landscape is moderately dissected by a low density of streams, flowing into several broad river systems.
The City of College Station is flanked by the Brazos River to the southwest and Navasota River to the east,
with the natural topography ranging from gently hilly in the center of town to relatively level terrain along the
Brazos and Navasota River floodplains.
The undeveloped landscape is characterized by a mosaic of post oak woodland and grassland. Drought,
grazing, and fire are the primary natural processes that have affected this ecoregion over time. Historically,
this region would have experienced frequent low-intensity fire, maintaining the savannah structure with
large mature trees and an understory of grasses. The combination of fire suppression and heavy livestock
grazing has increased the cover of low-growing woody plants with poor fire-resistance, particularly Eastern
Red Cedar and Honey Mesquite.
8
Page 19 of 108
BBRRAAZZOOSS RRII
VVEE
RRBRAZOSRIVE
R NANAVVASASOOTATARRII
VVERERNAVASOTARI
VERDATA SOURCE: FEMA
100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN
CITY LIMITS
RIVERS & STREAMS
ETJ
GRIMESCOUNTY
BURLESONCOUNTY
BRAZOSCOUNTY
021Miles
Floodplain
The city resides in the Region 8 Lower Brazos Flood Planning Region as identified by the Texas Water
Development Board. The Lower Brazos Region encompasses approximately 23,442 square miles and
includes 30 major lakes and reservoirs. The Lower Brazos River runs west of College Station, along the
border between Brazos County and Burleson County, on its way to the coast, where it enters the Gulf of
Mexico near Lake Jackson and Freeport. A network of waterways exists throughout the City of College
Station. The largest is Carter Creek, with Wolf Pen Creek, Bee Creek, Lick Creek, Spring Creek, and Alum
Creek running into it. There are approximately 3,959.30 acres of floodplain in the City limits, which accounts
for 8.3 % of the city’s land area.
The City employs development standards, future land use planning, and zoning provisions to protect and
preserve the natural function of the floodplains. The future land use designation of Natural & Open Areas
and the zoning district of Natural Areas Protected (NAP) are used to conserve natural areas and provide
conveyance of floodwaters. Currently, 87.7 acres of floodplains are preserved in College Station through
Natural Areas Protected (NAP) zoning. Additionally, the City proactively purchased a number of properties
in the floodplain in order to mitigate disruptions to natural conveyance structures. Currently, the City of
College Station owns 803.6 acres of floodplain in the City limits; most of this land is programed as city
parks, greenways, and open spaces for the public’s enjoyment.
The City’s floodplain management program helps citizens minimize flood-related property damage as well
as protect water quality, provide ideal wildlife habitat, and maintain dynamic travel corridors. The National
Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) has designated the College Station as a Class-6 Community in recognition
of the city’s flood management efforts beyond the minimum National Flood Insurance Program standards.
Subsequently, the flood insurance rates in College Station have been reduced by twenty (20) percent for
structures in Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA) and ten (10) percent in all areas outside of the SFHA since
2020.
9
Page 20 of 108
DEMOGRAPHICS
Population
The estimated population of College Station as of December 2023 was 128,370 (Planning and Development
Services, 2024). Over the last five years, the City’s population grew by approximately 7.9%, with an average
annual growth rate of 1.5% (Table 2). This slower growth rate reflects the impact of the COVID-19
pandemic, particularly through reduced student movement and the shift to distance learning during 2020
and early 2021.
10
Page 21 of 108
Table 2: College Station Population 2009-2023; Source: Planning and Development Services
Year Estimated
Population
Annual
Growth Rate
5-Year
Growth Rate
2009 93,450 2.81%
10.1%
2010 94,929 1.58%
2011 96,767 1.94%
2012 98,085 1.36%
2013 100,096 2.05%
2014 102,332 2.23%
18.9%
2015 106,581 4.15%
2016 109,927 3.14%
2017 116,893 6.34%
2018 118,967 1.77%
2019 121,489 2.12%
7.9%
2020 122,085 0.49%
2021 124,511 1.99%
2022 126,005 1.20%
2023 128,370 1.88%
The City’s population estimates are calculated by adding projected population
growth to a base number; typically, the population estimate from the most recent
decennial census. Population growth is calculated by multiplying the number of
demolition permits and recently issued residential certificates of occupancy by a
multiplier. The multiplier is based on the average household size and occupancy
rate from the most recent American Community Survey data releases.
11
Page 22 of 108
Growth Projections for 2030
Population projections for College Station were conducted at 2%, 2.5%, and 3% annual growth rates. Figure
7 compares trends and projections for 2030 against those from 2018 and 2023. Between 2014 and 2018, the
City experienced an 18.9% growth rate, which influenced higher projections for 2030. However, the 2020 dip
in growth altered this trajectory, leading to more conservative estimates.
Figure 6: 2030 Population Projections for College Station; Source: Planning and Development Services
STATE AND REGIONAL PROJECTIONS
In 2022, the Texas State Demographer projected the state’s population to reach between 44.4 million and
54.4 million by 2060. For Brazos County, the conservative estimate was 356,762, with a high-end projection
of 458,282 (Figure 6). The College Station-Bryan metropolitan area is expected to grow to 424,700 by 2060,
ranking 36th among 384 U.S. metropolitan areas (Stebbins, 2022).
200,000
180,000
160,000
140,000
120,000
100,000
80,000
60,000
40,000
20,000
0 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
2018 Projections 2023 Projections Recorded Population
109,927(2016)
128,370(2023)
3.0%, 156,7172.5%, 151,6532.0%, 146,729
12
Page 23 of 108
Density
The mean population density by block group in College Station is 8.75 people per acre, with the densest
block group reaching 31 people per acre. Figure 7 illustrates population density across the City, where red
areas indicate high-density zones, and green areas represent lower-density regions.
Figure 7: Population Density by Block Group, 2022 5-Year Estimate
Age Distribution
The demographic structure of College Station reflects its status as a university town, with 25.6% of
the population aged 20-24. Adjacent age groups (15-19 and 25-29) also constitute notable segments,
highlighting the City’s youthful character. Conversely, individuals aged 60 and above represent 11.2% of the
population, with those 75 and older accounting for only 3%.
The City’s 2023 population pyramid shows the largest proportion of residents in the university-age cohort.
Comparisons with 2018 reveal stable trends, but notable increases in the 85+ and 50-54 age groups.
021Miles
POPULATION
DENSITY
DATA SOURCE: ACS 2022 5-YEAR ESTIMATES
MID
POPULATION DENSITYPER SQUARE MILE
LOW HIGH
13
Page 24 of 108
Figure 8: College Station Population Pyramid. 2023 1-Year Estimate
Figure 9: Percent Population Change by Age Category 2018-2023; Source: U.S. Census Bureau
85 years and over
80 to 84 years
75 to 79 years
70 to 74 years
65 to 69 years
60 to 64 years
55 to 59 years
50 to 54 years
45 to 49 years
40 to 44 years
35 to 39 years
30 to 34 years
25 to 29 years
20 to 24 years
15 to 19 years
10 to 14 years
5 to 9 years
Under 5 years
20000 15000 10000 5000 0 5000 10000 15000 20000
Female Male
85 years and over
80 to 84 years
75 to 79 years
70 to 74 years
65 to 69 years
60 to 64 years
55 to 59 years
50 to 54 years
45 to 49 years
40 to 44 years
35 to 39 years
30 to 34 years
25 to 29 years
20 to 24 years
15 to 19 years
10 to 14 years
5 to 9 years
Under 5 years
-40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
-27.9%
-17.5%
-6.2%
-20.5%
-1.6%
-0.3%
77.2%
25.0%
18.0%
19.2%
15.1%
48.7%
31.4%
13.8%
1.5%
21.8%
22.0%
17.4%
14
Page 25 of 108
Ethnicity and Race
As of 2023, 89.1% of College Station’s population identified as one race, while 10.9% identified as two or
more races. The racial composition includes 67% White, 8.8% Black, 9.6% Asian, and 3.3% “some other
race.” Hispanic or Latino residents comprise 18.4% of the population. Between 2010 and 2023, the Black,
Hispanic, Asian, and “some other race” populations grew significantly, with increases of 56.9%, 84.5%,
34.3%, and 34.9%, respectively (Table 3).
Approximately 22.3% of residents speak a language other than English at home, with Spanish (11%), Indo-
European languages (5.3%), and Asian/Pacific Islander languages (4.3%) being the most common.
White
Asian
Black or African American
Some other race
American Indian and Alaska Native
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander
67.0%
9.6%
8.8%
3.3%
0.3%
0.1%
Figure 10: 2023 Race and Ethnicity; Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 2023 5-Year Estimates
Table 3: College Station Race and Ethnicity 2010-2023; Source: U.S. Census Bureau.
Race/Ethnicity 2010 2023 Numerical Change Percent Change
White 72,502 81,524 9,002 12.42%
Black 6,383 10,068 3,632 56.90%
Asian 8,576 11,573 2,942 34.31%
Hispanic 13,165 24,329 11,123 84.49%
Some Other Race 4,361 5,884 1,523 34.92%
15
Page 26 of 108
Education
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
A substantial portion of College Station’s population is highly educated. As of 2023, 59.1% of residents
held a bachelor’s degree or higher, while 5.7% had an associate’s degree. Around 11% of the population
was enrolled in K-12 schools. College students represent a significant demographic, with 35% of the total
population enrolled in undergraduate or graduate programs.
Figure 11: Educational Attainment; Source: U.S. Census Bureau ACS 2023 1-Year Estimate
HIGHER EDUCATION ENROLLMENT
The growth of Texas A&M University significantly influences College Station’s population trends. Since the
1960s, the university’s expanded enrollment, including the removal of its 50,000-student cap, has driven
demographic changes. In 2024, the University’s Capacity Study recommended pausing undergraduate
growth for five years due to infrastructure constraints.
Figure 12: exas A&M University Fall Enrollment; Source: Texas A&M University Office of Academic and Business Performance Analytics: Note: In 2013, Texas A&M added the School of Law campus enrollment to its enrollment counts. In 2014, the university added Galveston, Qatar, and other campuses to the enrollment count.
Graduate or professional degree
Bachelor’s degree
Associate’s degree
Some college, no degree
High school or equivalent degree
0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00%
26.80%
32.30%
5.70%
15.50%
14.40%
2018 Projections 2023 Projections Recorded Population
80,000
70,000
60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
1923 1933 1943 1953 1963 1973 1983 1993 2003 2013 2023
16
Page 27 of 108
Enrollment figures increased from 56,948 in 2014 to 71,127 in 2023, due to the university including other
campuses in its enrollment counts, such as Qatar and the School of Law, and the removal of the 50,000
student enrollment cap. The College Station student enrollment in the fall 2023 semester was 68,115.
Table 4: College Station Campus In Person Fall Enrollment Student Headcount; Source: Texas A&M University
Fall Term Students*
2020 63,280
2021 64,902
2022 65,914
2023 68,115
*Note: enrollment numbers include both in person and distance education students enrolled at College Station campus.
Blinn College, though smaller, also impacts the local student population. From 2019 to 2023, Texas A&M
University saw a 9% enrollment increase. Campuses in the City of Bryan, Blinn College and Texas A&M
Health Science Center, experienced a 5.7% decline and 19.6% increase, respectively, during the same
period (Table 5).
Table 5: Institutions of Higher Education and Enrollments, Fall 2019 and Fall 2023; Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board
Institution Institution Type Fall 2019
Enrollment
Fall 2023
Enrollment*
Percent Change in
Enrollment
Texas A&M University University 63,859 69,598 9.0%
Blinn College District*Junior or Community
College 14,082 9,905 -29.7%
Texas A&M Health Science
Center Health Science School 2,887 3,454 19.6%
Total N/A 135,079 138,320 2.4%
17
Page 28 of 108
MAIN CAMPUS1
ANIMAL SCIENCE COMPLEX2
HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER3
4 RELLIS CAMPUS
5 BLINN COLLEGE
W SH 21
FM 60SH
4
7
S
H
6
SH 30
HIGHER
EDUCATION
S
H
6
DATA SOURCE: TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY & BLINN COLLEGE
0 2.51.25 Miles
1
2
3
4
5
EASTERWOOD
AIRPORT
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY PROPERTY
BLINN COLLEGE PROPERTY
COLLEGE STATION CITY LIMITS
BRYAN CITY LIMITS
Figure 13: Map of Texas A&M University Property; Source: Planning and Development Services
Page 29 of 108
Income
The 2023 median household income in College Station was $47,632, significantly lower than Texas’ median
of $75,780. Poverty rates vary by age, with 13.5% of children, 36.8% of working-age adults, and 9.6% of
seniors living below the poverty line. Family households have a median income of $91,354, while married-
couple families earn significantly more at $112,420. Nonfamily households report a much lower median
income of $31,102.
Figure 14: Median Income in the Past 12 Months Comparisons; Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2023 1-Year Estimate
Vulnerable Populations
In College Station, several factors contribute to the vulnerability of specific population groups, including
children, the elderly, non-English speakers, individuals with disabilities, and those living below the income
poverty threshold. Notably, 7.3% of the City’s population lacks health insurance, limiting access to essential
healthcare services. Approximately 22.3% of residents speak a language other than English at home, with
Spanish being the most common (11%) (Figure 15). Of those who speak a non-English language, 5.4%
report speaking English less than “very well.”
Figure 15: Language Spoken at Home; Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 2023 1-Year Estimate
$120,000
$100,000
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$0 College Station
$91,354
$112,420
$31,102
Brazos County
$85,214
$107,292
$35,412
Texas
$91,467
$109,997
$47,822
Families
Married-couple familiesNonfamily households
Faimilies Married-couple families Nonfamily households
English only
Spanish
Other Indo-European languages
Asian and Pacific Islander languages
Other languages
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
1.70%
4.30%
5.30%
11.00%
77.70%
19
Page 30 of 108
Approximately 8.8% of the total population (11,023 people) has a disability. Disability types were categorized
across age groups, reflecting varying impacts.
Figure 16: Population with a Disability by Type; Source: U.S. Census Bureau ACS 2023 1-Year Estimate
Household Size and Composition
Data on household composition and occupancy patterns in College Station highlights the diversity of living
arrangements and housing units, reflecting the City’s demographic makeup, substantial student population,
and variety of household types.
HOUSEHOLDS AND FAMILY COMPOSITION
College Station is home to approximately 47,029 households, with 35.4% consisting of married couples,
29.9% of male householders without spouses or partners, and 29.7% of female householders in similar
circumstances. Individuals living alone represent 17.8% of households, with only 3.4% involving individuals
aged 65 or older living alone. Additionally, 22.7% of households include children under 18 years old, and
14.7% have members aged 65 or older. The average household size is 2.37, slightly lower than the average
family size of 3.05.
HOUSEHOLD SIZE AND OCCUPANCY
Occupied housing units in College Station predominantly consist of smaller households. Single-person
households account for 31.5% of all units, with renters representing a significant majority (37.5%) compared
to owners (20.4%). Two-person households are also prevalent, making up 32.9% of all units, with a
more balanced distribution between owner-occupied (35.4%) and renter-occupied (31.6%) units. Larger
households with four or more occupants are more common among homeowners (24.8%) compared to
renters (16.7%), indicating that larger family units are more likely to own their homes.
2.30%
2.40%
3.90%
3.40%
1.80%
3.50%Independent living diiculty
Self-care diiculty
Ambulatory diiculty
Cognitive diiculty
Vision diiculty
Hearing diiculty
20
Page 31 of 108
FAMILY AND NONFAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
Figure 17: Households by Type; Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Family households make up 45.6% of all housing units, with significant differences between owner-
occupied and renter-occupied units. Among owner-occupied housing, 76.0% are family households, while
renters are predominantly nonfamily households (70.7%). Married-couple families dominate the family
household category for owners (68.8%), whereas renters have higher shares of other family types (11.8%)
and single-parent households.
Nonfamily households form the majority (54.4%) of all housing units, with renters accounting for 70.7% of
this group. Single-person households (37.5% of renters) are particularly common, consistent with a student-
oriented rental market. Renters are also more likely to live with roommates or other nonfamily members
(33.2%) compared to homeowners (3.6%).
PRESENCE OF CHILDREN
Figure 18: Household Composition – Children, Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Family households with children are more common among homeowners. Approximately 22.3% of
households have children under 18, with 35.7% of owner-occupied units falling into this category compared
to 15.1% of renter-occupied units. Renters with children are more likely to have younger children, whereas
homeowners are more likely to have children aged 6 to 17 years.
Texas
College-Station Bryan MSA
College Station
67.4% 32.6%
55.9% 44.1%
45.6% 54.4%
Family Households Non-family Households
Households with Children under 18 Households without Children under 18
21.0% 79.0%
23.2% 76.8%
2023
2018
21
Page 32 of 108
RENTER- VS. OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING
The data reflects a clear divide between owner-occupied and renter-occupied housing in College Station.
Renters dominate the housing landscape, particularly among younger, smaller households and nonfamily
living arrangements, indicative of the university influence on the local housing market. Meanwhile, owner-
occupied housing has more families, older residents, and larger households. These trends highlight the
unique housing dynamics shaped by the city’s diverse population and economic drivers.
Figure 19: Owner vs Renter Occupied Housing Units Comparisons; Source: U.S. Census Bureau ACS 2023 1-Year Estimates
A clear divide exists between owner-occupied and renter-occupied housing in College Station. Renters
dominate the housing landscape, particularly among younger, smaller households and nonfamily living
arrangements, reflecting the influence of the local university. Owner-occupied housing is more prevalent
among families, older residents, and larger households, underscoring the varied housing dynamics shaped
by the city’s diverse population and economic drivers.
Texas
College Station - Bryan MSA
College Station
Owner Occupied Renter Occupied
62.5% 37.4%
50.2% 49.8%
34.9% 65.1%
Housing
STOCK AND INVENTORY
From 2019 to 2023, residential construction permits fluctuated across housing types. Single-family detached
homes dominated, peaking at 610 permits in 2021 before declining to 410 in 2023. Multi-family units saw
volatility, with a sharp increase in 2020 and 2021 but subsequent declines. Duplex permits fell consistently,
while townhomes showed moderate activity.
Housing units reflect a diverse
mix: 54.3% have two or three
bedrooms, 28.6% have four or
more bedrooms, and smaller units
account for the remainder. Most
housing stock is relatively modern,
with 45.6% built between 2000
and 2019 and an additional 4.57%
constructed since 2020.
Year
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
1,366
1,049
1,302
722
1,177
Figure 20: Housing Units Issued a Certificate of Occupancy by Year; Source: Planning and Development Services
22
Page 33 of 108
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
790
945
1,321
1,127
889
Figure 21: New Residential Permits 2019-2023, Source: Planning and Development Services
Table 6: New Residential Permits 2019-2023; Source: Planning and Development Services
Residential Permit Type 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Duplex 30 13 4 12 10
Multi-Family 3 21 21 3 12
Single Family Attached Townhome 25 55 76 64 47
Single Family Detached 366 428 610 524 410
Table 7: New Residential Housing Units 2019-2023, Source: Planning and Development Services
Residential Type 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Duplex 53 26 8 24 12
Multi-Family 157 655 657 22 277
Single Family Attached Townhome 28 55 76 64 47
Single Family Detached 366 428 610 524 410
23
Page 34 of 108
4 or more bedrooms
No bedroom
One bedroom
2 or 3 bedrooms 3.0%
14.2%
54.3%
28.6%
Figure 22: Housing Units by Bedroom Count; Source: U.S. Census Bureau ACS 2023 1-Year Estimate
The occupied housing stock in College Station reflects a dynamic growth pattern over the decades, with
the majority of housing units being relatively modern. Table 8 highlights a relatively young and expanding
housing landscape in College Station.
Table 8: Age of Occupied Housing Stock by Year Built; Source: U.S. Census Bureau ACS 2023 1-Year Estimate
Year Structure Built Housing Units Percent
1939 or earlier 164 0.35%
1940-1959 1,375 2.92%
1960-1979 8,583 18.25%
1980-1999 13,309 28.30%
2000-2019 21,447 45.60%
2020-2023 2,151 4.57%
The 2023 estimate of housing stock in College Station reveals significant diversity in housing types, with a
substantial presence of multi-family and single-family units.
Figure 23: Housing Units by Housing Type; Source: U.S. Census Bureau ACS 2023 1-Year
Multi-Family
Single-Family
Townhouses
Duplex
Mobile homes
Other
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000
23,913
22,074
3,462
3,224
515
61
24
Page 35 of 108
Occupancy and Tenure
HOUSING OCCUPANCY
Figure 24: Housing Occupancy Status Comparisons; Source: U.S. Census Bureau ACS 2023 1-Year Estimate
Figure 25: Occupied Housing Units by Housing Type and Owner-Renter Status; Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2023 1-Year Estimates
Occupancy and tenure data provide insights into the local housing market, reflecting patterns of ownership,
rental activity, and housing characteristics. College Station has an estimated total of 52,687 housing units,
with 89.3% of these units being occupied and 10.7% vacant (ACS 2023). The homeowner vacancy rate is
a low 1.7%, indicating strong demand for owner-occupied housing, while the rental vacancy rate is higher
at 5.3%, reflecting greater availability in the rental market. These figures suggest a relatively tight housing
market, particularly for homeowners.
Texas
College Station - Bryan MSA
College Station
Occupied Vacant
91.4%8.6%
91.0%9.0%
92.0%8.0%
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000
Single-Family
Multi-Family
Duplex
Townhouses
Mobile homes
Boat, RV, Van, etc.
Owner-occupied housing units
Renter-occupied housing units
Boat, RV, Van, etc.Mobile Homes Townhouses Duplex Multi-Family Single-Family
9 244 634 53 572 14456
52 211 2326 2594 17442 5436
25
Page 36 of 108
RENTALS
Renters dominate the housing market, comprising 65.1% of occupied units, consistent with the City’s
student population. Registered rental properties account for 32% of single-family and duplex units, with
concentrations near Texas A&M University. High turnover rates are evident, with 55.6% of householders
moving into their homes since 2021.
Figure 26: Rental Registration Density; Source: City of College Station
ON-CAMPUS HOUSING
Texas A&M University’s on-campus housing consists of 25 residence halls, two university apartments, and
the Corp of Cadets dormitory. While the university has an enrollment of 47,721 students in College Station,
these options hold a capacity of approximately 11,000 students. In its 2024 Capacity Study, Texas A&M
University reported that on-campus housing is at full capacity, and recommends the university increase the
number of beds by 2,500 (2024 Capacity Study Report, Texas A&M University).
010.5 Miles
RENTAL REGISTRATION DENSITY
MIDLOW HIGH
DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
THE BARRACKS
SPRING LOOP AREA SUMMIT CROSSING
HORSE HAVEN
STEEPLECHASE
WOLF PEN CREEK AREA
SOUTHWOOD VALLEY
DOVE CROSSING
EDELWEISS GARTENS
SPRING CREEKTOWNHOMES
CREEK MEADOWS
COLLEGE HILLS
26
Page 37 of 108
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Employment
Between 2018 and 2023, the total number of people employed in the College Station – Bryan MSA
increased by 16.2%, a larger percent increase than both the state and neighboring MSAs (Table 9). Texas
A&M University continues to be the largest employer in the Brazos Valley.
27
Page 38 of 108
Table 9: Total Nonfarm Employment (2023) and Changes in Employment Levels (2018-2023);
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
Region Total Employed
2018
Total Employed
2023
% Change,
2018-2023
United States 148,908,000 156,051,000 4.8%
Texas 12,523,300 13,912,700 11.1%
College Station - Bryan MSA 119,700 139,100 16.2%
Killeen- Temple MSA 143,100 153,500 7.3%
Waco MSA 123,400 135,000 9.4%
Table 10: Leading Employers – College Station; Source: Greater Brazos Partnership, 2024
Number of Employees Employer
5,000+ Texas A&M University
1,000 - 4,999 City of College Station
College Station Independent School District
500 - 999
Baylor Scott and White
FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies
Reynolds and Reynolds
250 - 499 Cognizant Technology Solutions
G-CON Manufacturing
100 - 249
C.C. Creations
Kelsey-Seybold Clinic
Matica Biotechnology
28
Page 39 of 108
Table 11: MSA Employment by Industry, Bureau of Labor Statistics
MSA Employment by Industry % Total Employment in MSA
2018 2023
Government
Federal Government 0.7%0.6%
State Government 23.3%22.8%
Local Government 9.6%8.8%
Private
Natural Resources and Mining 2.8%2.2%
Construction 5.1%4.5%
Manufacturing 5.0%4.7%
Trade, Transportation, and Utilities 14.1%13.9%
Information 0.0%1.1%
Financial Activities 3.4%3.4%
Professional and Business Services 7.8%9.5%
Education and Health Services 10.4%11.7%
Leisure and Hospitality 14.3%14.6%
Other Services 2.2%2.2%
Public Administration 0.0%0.0%
Unclassified 0.0%0.1%
College Station has a growing, educated labor force and low unemployment rate (Figure 59). The average
annual unemployment rate for College Station in 2023 was 3.2%, while the unemployment rate for the State
of Texas was 3.9%.
Table 12: Average Annual Unemployment Rate Comparisons
Average Annual Unemployment Rate
Year College Station CS-B MSA Texas
2018 2.9% 3.0% 3.9%
2019 2.8% 2.8% 3.5%
2020 5.0% 5.5% 7.7%
2021 3.8% 4.2% 5.6%
2022 3.1% 3.2% 3.9%
2023 3.2% 3.2% 3.9%
29
Page 40 of 108
14%
12%
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
CS-B MSA Texas
Figure 27: College Station-Bryan MSA Unemployment Rate 2018-2024; Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024
While employment in the CS-B MSA grew at a faster rate than both the state and the nation, it had notably
lower average annual wages. Median earnings are also lower in the MSA when compared to the median
earnings of individuals with similar education levels across the state.
Table 13: Average Annual Pay for Nonfarm Employment (2023) and Changes in Average Annual Pay (2018-2023); Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
Region Average Annual
Pay 2018
Average Annual
Pay 2023
% Change
2018-2023
United States $57,266 $72,360 26.4%
Texas $57,747 $72,318 25.2%
College Station - Bryan MSA $41,882 $52,739 25.9%
Killeen- Temple MSA $46,034 $57,659 25.3%
Waco MSA $46,096 $57,388 24.5%
30
Page 41 of 108
Graduate or Professional Degree
Bachelor Degree
Some College or Associate Degree
High School Graduate or GED
No High School Diploma
$66,899
$66,474
$45,447
$37,086
$30,388
$55,613
$41,572
$32,179
$20,819
Texas College Station
$83,517
Figure 28: Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months; 2023 ACS 1-Year Estimate, US Census Bureau
Between 2018 and 2022, there was a loss of about 5,000 primary jobs in College Station (LEHD, Census
Bureau). The largest losses occurred in 2020 and were most likely related to labor market changes brought
on by the COVID-19 Pandemic. Since 2018 the percentage of primary jobs in College Station held by
workers who live outside the city has increased. The top places where workers live outside of College
Station and Bryan are Houston, Austin, and San Antonio.
COLLEGE STATION INFLOW/OUTFLOW JOB COUNTS IN 2022 – ALL WORKERS
Figure 29: College Station, TX Inflow/Outflow Jobs Counts (Primary Jobs); Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics, US Census Bureau
Employed in
College Station,
Lives outside
Employed
and Lives in
College Station
Lives in
College Station,
Employed Outside
36,705 14,924 25,764
31
Page 42 of 108
Table 14: College Station, TX Inflow/Outflow Jobs Counts (Primary Jobs);
Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics, US Census Bureau
Inflow/Outflow Job Count (Primary Jobs) 2018 2022
Employed in College Station 56,610 51,629
Lives Outside 39,605 70.0% 36,705 71.1%
Lives Inside 17,005 30.0% 14,924 28.9%
Lives in College Station 37,047 40,688
Employed Outside 20,042 54.1% 25,764 63.3%
Employed Inside 17,005 45.9% 14,924 36.7%
Housing Market
The median home sale
price in College Station
has shown a consistent
upward trajectory from
2011 to 2023. In 2011,
the median home sale
price was approximately
$150,000, but by 2023, it
had more than doubled,
exceeding $300,000. This
sharp increase highlights
the city’s economic
growth, increased
housing demand, and
rising construction costs
over the past decade.
$350,000
$300,000
$250,000
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
$0
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
$0 - $69K$70K - $99K$100K - 149K$150K - $199K$200K - $249K$250K - $299K$300K - $399K$400K - $499K$500K - $749K$750K - $999K$1M+2018 2023
Figure 30: Median Home Sale Price 2011-2023; Source: Texas Real Estate Center
Figure 31: College Station Housing Sales Price Distribution 2018 vs 2023; Source: Texas Real Estate Center32
Page 43 of 108
INVENTORY AND SUPPLY DYNAMICS
The inventory of active listings and months of inventory fluctuated significantly since the last Existing
Conditions report in 2018. In the early years (2018-2019), inventory levels were higher, with months of
inventory consistently above 4 months, reflecting a balanced market. However, during the pandemic years
(2020-2021), inventory levels dropped dramatically as demand outpaced supply. By December 2021, months
of inventory fell to just 0.42, marking a seller’s market.
Starting in 2022, inventory levels began to recover as market conditions shifted. By the end of 2023, months
of inventory reached 2.47, signaling a move toward more balanced market conditions.
Property Tax and Assessed Value
Over the last decade, College Station’s total taxable assessed value has almost doubled (Figure 68).
Between 2018 and 2023 alone, total taxable assessed value increased by 34%, primarily fueled by rising
prices and added value through new construction.
Figure 32: Total Taxable Assessed Value 2014-2023; City of College Station 2023 ACFR
The total appraised value for all property in the City of College Station is over $17.6 billion (2023 Certified
Tax Roll, Brazos County Appraisal District). Residential properties make up $9.1 billion dollars in valuation
and commercial properties make up $7.8 billion dollars. The remainder is largely comprised of vacant and
agricultural land valued at $844 million.
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
$6.23 $6.65 $7.16
$7.95
$8.90 $9.38 $9.92 $10.07 $10.48
$11.96
33
Page 44 of 108
BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITEHOSPITAL & CLINIC
MIDTOWN CITY CENTER
MIDTOWN
CAPROCK CROSSINGAPARTMENTS
THE RANCH AT
ARRINGTON
SUMMIT CROSSING
THE BARRACKS
MISSION RANCH
VIASAT
LAKE WALK AT
TRADITIONSAPARTMENTS
PARK WEST
CITYVIEWSOUTHWEST
GREENS PRAIRIE RESERVE
THE GEORGE HOTEL
ASPIRE COLLEGE STATION
RISE AT NORTHGATE
TEXAS A&M HOTEL &
CONFERENCE CENTERTHE HUDSON
REV NORTHGATE
STUDENT LIVING
THE STANDARD
THE CALLAWAY HOUSE EMBASSY SUITES
CAMBRIDGE
CREEK MEADOWS
PEBBLE CREEK
GARDEN
THE CROSSINGAT LICK CREEK
Texas A&M Campus property is excluded from map**
APPRAISED PROPERTY VALUES
PROPERTY VALUE PER ACRE
MIDLOW HIGH
375K 1M 1.5M 2M 2.5M 5M 45M020M10M750K
DATA SOURCE: BRAZOS CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT CERTIFIED 2023 VALUES
Figure 33: Appraised Property Values Per Acre; Source: Planning and Development Services
Page 45 of 108
Table 15: City Property Tax Rate Over Time;
Source: Brazos County Appraisal District
Year City Property Tax Rate
2014 0.452500
2015 0.452500
2016 0.472500
2017 0.497500
2018 0.505841
2019 0.534618
2020 0.534618
2021 0.534618
2022 0.524613
2023 0.513086
College Station’s property tax rate is very
competitive and among the lowest in the State
for cities of its size. The FY2023 property tax rate
was set at 51.3086¢ per $100 of assessed value, up
20.5% from FY2014.
Over the last ten years, the City’s annual property
tax collection grew by 130%.
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
$26.2 $29.4 $31.7
$36.8
$42.8 $46.6
$51.4 $52.1 $53.8
$60.3
Figure 34: Property Tax Collections within Fiscal Year of the Levy; Source: City of College Station 2023 ACFR
Residential Commercial
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
$69.0
$107.6
$100.2
$160.5
$163.5
$215.8 $144.9
$160.8
$268.8
$167.7
Figure 35: New Construction Valuation; Source: Planning & Development Services
While single family construction
represented the largest portion of new
residential construction valuation (69%),
the number of single-family permits
declined over the last two years. Though
multi-family permits only make up 0.44%
of all residential permits issued between
2019-2023, it accounted for 21% of new
residential construction valuation. New
Commercial development between 2019-
2023 was valued at $746,453,119.
35
Page 46 of 108
Table 16: Residential Valuation by Residential Type 2019-2023
Residential Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Duplex $7,967,765 $3,737,724 $1,119,640 $3,102,623 $1,888,360
Townhome $3,321,540 $6,930,368 $33,629,063 $9,218,976 $6,951,686
Single Family Detached $81,003,819 $90,321,188 $132,201,798 $145,697,386 $114,059,008
Multifamily $15,340,000 $59,463,389 $48,863,692 $2,825,000 $44,824,217
Total $107,633,124 $160,452,669 $215,814,193 $160,843,985 $167,723,271
Sales Tax
The City receives 1.5% of sales tax on goods and beverages sold within the city limits (Figure 74). Retail
and food services make up approximately 71% of the College Station sales tax base, with professional and
general services accounting for an additional 21% (Figure 46).
Figure 36: Sales Tax by Industry Type; City of College Station 2023-2024 Approved Annual Budget
While the nominal
amount of sales
tax has steadily
increased over
the last decade,
when adjusted
for inflation, the
amount of sales that
received by the city
has been relatively
flat since 2017.
Retail
Professional & General Services
Accomodation & Food Services
Other
19.65%
8.28%
20.47%
51.60%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
$24.57 $26.69 $27.16 $28.56 $28.80 $30.73 $30.06
$34.84
$39.17 $40.98
Figure 37: Tax Revenue by Source, Governmental Funds; City of College Station ACFR 2023
36
Page 47 of 108
Tourism
College Station boasts many key attractions including the Brazos Valley Veterans Memorial, the Benjamin
Knox Gallery, Century Square, Dixie Chicken, Kyle Field, Hullabaloo Diner, and more. Another major
attraction in College Station is the George Bush Presidential Library and Museum, which attracts an
average of 128,630 visitors annually. The City also works in partnership with attractions in its extraterritorial
jurisdiction, like Santa’s Wonderland, that bring tourists into the city.
In alignment with national trends, travel and tourism related spending dropped significantly in 2020 due to
the COVID-19 Pandemic. In 2021, tourism spending recovered slightly, and by 2023 the City experienced an
all-time high in Hotel Occupancy Tax Revenues, Visitor Spending, and Sales Tax Generated by Visitors. In
2023, College Station’s tourism sector generated 5,200 jobs worth 169.4 million dollars in payroll.
SOLD AVAILABLE PERCENT OCCUPIED
Figure 38: Hotel Indicators; Source: City of College Station
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
$5.1M $5.3M $5.3M $5.2M
$5.7M $5.8M
$3.8M
$4.3M
$6.5M
$7.4M
Figure 39: Hotel Occupancy Tax Fund Revenues; City of College Station ACFR 2023
37
Page 48 of 108
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
$343.6 $332.7 $330.6 $353.3
$385.2 $390.4
$255.4
$365.8
$428.0 $433.1
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
$9.2M $9.3M $9.6M
$11.0M
$12.3M $12.6M
$8.6M
$13.2M
$15.1M $15.5M
Figure 40: Total Direct Travel Spending;
Office of the Governor – Economic Development & Tourism
Figure 41: Local Tax Receipts Generated by Travel Spending;
Office of the Governor – Economic Development & Tourism
Page 49 of 108
HOTEL ROOMS
>300
200-300
150-200
100-150
50-100
<50
#OF ROOMS
010.5 Miles
DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
TEXAS AVE TEXAS AVE S
GEORGE BUSH DRUNIVERSITY DRWELLBORN RD
WELLBORN RDUNIVERSITYDR EMUNSON AVE
HARVEY RDSH 6 S
SH 6 SROCK PRAIRIE RDROCK PRAIRIE RDDEACONDRFM 2818SOUTHWEST PKWYHOLLEMANDRPARK PLACEGRAHAM RDEAGLE AVENGMIRE DRLO
Figure 42: Hotel Rooms by Number of Rooms; Source: City of College Station
The City currently has 40 hotels that have a combined total of 4,354 hotel rooms (Figure 42).
Page 50 of 108
LAND USE
This section examines the land use patterns and planning strategies in College Station. It covers the City’s
growth and annexation history, current and future land use designations, zoning regulations, and the
challenges and opportunities facing land use planning in the City. Understanding these elements is crucial
for guiding the City’s development and ensuring a balanced, sustainable urban environment.
The data on future land use, zoning, and existing land use provides a comprehensive view of how College
Station is planning and managing its growth.
City Growth and Annexation
Annexation is a tool for cities to extend land development regulations – particularly zoning – to manage
growth and land use to implement the comprehensive plan. Subsequently, annexation also extends the
City’s ETJ boundaries, enabling it to regulate the subdivision of land over a larger area.
Since incorporation in 1938, the City of College Station has actively annexed property into its City limits.
Between 1938 and 1960, the areas primarily surrounding Texas A&M University were brought into the City
limits. By 1980, the City had expanded along Earl Rudder Freeway (State Highway 6) down to Greens
Prairie Road, currently referred to as William D. Fitch Parkway. Annexations after 1990 expanded the City
limit lines further east along Carter Creek and south and west along Wellborn Road.
40
Page 51 of 108
ANNEXATION
021Miles
DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
< 1959
1960-1979
1980-1999
2000-2019
DECADE
ANNEXED
Figure 44: Annexation by Decade Map; Source: City of College Station
1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Figure 43: Growth of College Station’s City Limits (1940-2020); Source: City of College Station
41
Page 52 of 108
NON-ANNEXATION
AGREEMENTS
2028
2031
EXPIRATION
YEAR
DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
0 2.51.25 Miles
At the time of incorporation, the City’s ETJ extended one mile beyond the City limits. As a result of
annexations and population growth, the City’s ETJ expanded as prescribed by the Texas Local Government
Code.
Table 17: Extent of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Over Time; Source: City of College Station
ETJ Boundary – Miles beyond City Limits Population threshold Year of Expansion
2 25,000 1974
3.5 50,000 1980
5 100,000+ 2018
In 2006, the City began the process of creating an annexation program for properties in the ETJ with an
agricultural exemption. The Texas legislature enacted a State law to preserve agricultural land and protect it
from municipal annexation. As a part of the law, the City was required to offer development agreements to
the property owners of agriculturally appraised land, which protects the land from annexation for 10 years
if the property maintains agricultural status and remains undeveloped. As of 2018, the City has entered into
development agreements that cover 2,211 acres of agricultural land initially proposed for annexation.
Figure 45: Non-Annexation Agreements Map; Source: City of College Station
42
Page 53 of 108
On May 24, 2019, municipal annexation as it existed over the last century was stopped by House Bill 347
(HB347), removing the ability of cities to unilaterally annex new territory. Prior to HB347, annexations were a
key tool for cities to manage population growth and ensure financial security for infrastructure and facilities
that provide municipal services (Texas Municipal League 2019). This landmark legislation significantly
altered the landscape for municipal growth in Texas, requiring most annexations by cities in Texas to receive
landowner or voter approval. The City of College Station annexed four acres at the request of the property
owner in 2019 under the new annexation regulations. This property was surrounded by the College Station
city limits and as so situated, did not expand the city’s extra-territorial jurisdiction.
State law allows cities to annex areas without consent if the area is subject to a Strategic Partnership
Agreement, which defines the option and timing for future annexation through the agreement. College
Station currently has two Strategic Partnership Agreements—one for Brazos County Municipal Utility
District No. 1 (Southern Pointe), and one for Brazos County MUD No. 2 (Millican Reserve). MUDs also allow
cities to control growth through Development Agreements.
PLATTED GROWTH
Platting involves creating a detailed map of a property showing how it will be divided into lots. The platting
process prepares a property for development and subdivision by ensuring it can be properly served by
utilities, can access the transportation network, and meets zoning requirements. Growth and platting
activity during College Station’s early years reflects the influence of Texas A&M University as the physical,
economic, and social center. Over the years, platting activity has steadily expanded outward, particularly to
the south. By interlocal agreement, the City does not review plats in the portions of the ETJ within Burleson
County. From 2019 to 2023, the city processed 67 final plats covering 738 acres.
Figure 46: Platted Growth Over Time; Source: City of College Station
0 2.51.25 Miles
DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
PLATTED GROWTH
HISTORY
1960-1979
< 1959
1980-1999
2000-2019
2020-2024
UNPLATTED
43
Page 54 of 108
FUTURE LAND USE & CHARACTER
DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
0 1.50.75 Miles
URBAN CENTER
NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER
GENERAL COMMERCIAL
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL
BUSINESS CENTER
URBAN RESIDENTIAL
MIXED RESIDENTIAL
SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL
ESTATE RESIDENTIAL
RURAL
NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION
MEDICAL
INSTITUTIONAL/PUBLIC
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY
PARKS & GREENWAYS
NATURAL & OPEN AREAS
REDEVELOPMENT AREAS
The Future Land Use and Character
Map (FLU Map) is the part of the
City’s Comprehensive Plan that
represents the community’s desired
future land use pattern. The future
land use categories included within
the Comprehensive Plan (Chapter
2, Distinctive Places) serve as policy
guides and set expectations for how
land within the City of College Station
should be developed and used in
the future. Those who seek a zoning
change either need to comply with
the Future Land Use and Character
Map or seek a Comprehensive Plan
amendment.
Figure 47: Future Land Use and Character Map; Source City of College Station
Page 55 of 108
Table 18: Acres of Future Land Use by Type; Source: Planning and Development Services
Land Use Type Acres Percent
Residential 14,835.6 45.54%
Natural Areas 5,129.4 15.74%
Texas A&M University 4,884.1 14.99%
Commercial/Industrial 4,745.8 14.57%
Mixed-Use 1,591.5 4.89%
Civic 1,145 3.51%
Rural 247.9 0.76%
Figure 48: Acres of Future Land Use by Type; Source: Planning and Development Services
Table 19: Percent of Residential Land Use Types; Source: Planning and Development Services
Residential Land Use Type Percent
Suburban Residential 47.71%
Estate Residential 24.91%
Neighborhood Conservation 12.10%
Mixed Residential 8.78%
Urban Residential 6.50%
Table 20: Percentage of Commercial Land Use Types; Source: City of College Station
Commercial Land Use Type Percent
General Commercial 42.45%
Business Center 40.41%
Neighborhood Commercial 17.14%
While the Future Land Use and Character Map provides a vision for College Station’s development, there
are notable differences between planned land use and zoning.
Residential
Natural Areas
Texas A&M University
Commercial/Industrial
Mixed-Use
Civic
Rural
14,835.6
5,129.4
4,884.1
4,745.8
1,591.5
1,145.0
247.9
45
Page 56 of 108
Table 21: Comparisons of Future Land Use and Zoning by Category
Category Future Land Use Zoning
Residential 14,836 11,697
Commercial 4,746 3,680
Mixed-Use 1,592 537
Rural 248 9,705
Comprehensive Plan Amendments
The Comprehensive Plan is a living document, subject to amendments as the community’s needs
and circumstances change. The Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) requires that all zoning map
amendments (rezoning) follow the Comprehensive Plan. The majority of amendments that are considered
are at the request of a property owner as they seek a zoning designation for their property that is not
aligned with the Future Land Use and Character Map.
Table 22: Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2019-2023
Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Grand Total
APPROVED 5 2 3 6 3 19
DENIED 1 2 1 0 0 4
TOTAL 6 4 4 6 3 23
PERCENT APPROVED 83%50%75%100%100%83%
From 2019 to 2023, a total of 23 Comprehensive Plan amendments were considered by the City Council,
with 19 ultimately approved, resulting in an overall approval rate of 83%. The majority of the amendments
considered were initiated by private property owners, while 7 of the CPAs were city-initiated amendments,
as listed in Table 25.
Table 23: City Initiated Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan 2019-2023
City-Initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendment Status Date
Thoroughfare Plan – Thousand Oaks Ranch Approved 02/11/2020
Economic Development Master Plan Approved 03/31/2020
10-Year Comprehensive Plan Update Approved 07/20/2021
Plan Update – Neighborhood Center Amendment Approved 03/07/2022
Sunsetting Small Area Plans Approved 10/04/2022
Northeast Gateway Redevelopment Plan Approved 07/14/2023
Wellborn District Plan Update Approved 07/14/2023
Zoning
Properties in the city limits are subject to zoning, which provides a property’s legal entitlements regarding
the types of allowed land uses, dimensional standards, and form. At the time of annexation, land is given
the residential/agricultural zoning classification of Rural, with the expectation that a rezoning request will be
made for new development that requires a more intense classification.
46
Page 57 of 108
C-3 Light Commercial
R-1B Single Family Residential
R-4 Multi-Family
R-6 High Density Multi-Family
R&D Research and Development
M-1 Light Industrial
M-2 Heavy Industrial
OV Corridor Overlay
RDD Redevelopment District
NPO Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay
NCO Neighborhood Conservation Overlay
NAP Natural Areas Protected
R Rural
E Estate
RS Restricted Suburban
GS General Suburban
D Duplex
T Townhouse
MF Multi-Family
MU Mixed-Use
MHP Manufactured Homes
O O ice
WE Wellborn EstateWW
WRS Wellborn Restricted SuburbanWW
SC Suburban Commercial
GC General Commercial
CI Commercial Industrial
BP Business Park
BPI Business Park Industrial
C-U College and University
P-MUD Planned Mixed-Use Development
PDD Planned Development District
NG-1 Core Northgate
NG-2 Transitional Northgate
NG-3 Residential Northgate
WPC Wolf Pen Creek
WC Wellborn CommercialWW
MH Middle Housing
ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay
HOO High Occupancy Overlay
ZONING
0 1.50.75 Miles
DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Figure 49: Zoning Map of College Station, Texas; Source: City of College Station
Page 58 of 108
Zoning data reveals that residential zones dominate at 32.35%, with GS General Suburban zoning
accounting for 60.21% of this category. Multi-family and High-Density Multi-Family zones together
represent less than 15%.
Commercial and industrial zoning makes up 10.68%, with the majority being GC General Commercial
(60.09%).
Table 24: Acres of Zoning by Category; Source: Planning and Development Services
Zoning Category Acres Percent
Residential 10,301 32.35%
Rural 9705 30.47%
Texas A&M University 5,472 17.18%
Commercial/Industrial 3,400 10.68%
Planned Development District 2,604 8.18%
Design Districts 273 0.86%
Natural Areas Protected 87 0.27%
Mixed-Use 3.7 0.01%
Figure 50: Acres of Zoning by Category; Source: Planning and Development Services
Residential
Rural
Texas A&M University
Commercial/Industrial
Planned Development District
Design Districts
Natural Areas Protected
Mixed-Use
10,301
9,705
5,472
3,400
2,604
273
87
4
48
Page 59 of 108
Table 25: Acres of Residential Zoning by Type; Source: Planning and Development Services
Residential Zoning Type Acres Percent
General Suburban 6,203 60.21%
Estate 893 8.67%
Multi-Family 805 7.82%
High Density Multi-Family 754 7.32%
Restricted Suburban 724 7.03%
Middle Housing 365 3.55%
Duplex 187 1.81%
Townhouse 175 1.70%
Single-Family Residential 116 1.12%
Wellborn Restricted Suburban 55 0.53%
Manufactured Home Park 25 0.24%
Within the broader zoning framework, College Station employs special overlay districts to address specific
characteristics and concerns. Two key examples are the neighborhood Restricted Occupancy Overlay
(ROO) and High Occupancy Overlay (HOO) districts, which regulate the number of unrelated individuals
who can live in a single-family home. The city has 219 acres of High Occupancy Overlay, approximately
11.4% of available acreage (middle housing, mixed use, and multifamily zoning districts). 112.8 acres of
Restricted Occupancy Overlay have been established, just 1.8% of all general suburban/ single-family
acreage.
Table 26: Acres of Commercial and Industrial Zoning by Type; Source: Planning and Development Services
Commercial / Industrial Zoning Type Acres Percent
General Commercial 2,043 60.09%
Light Industrial 804.7 23.67%
Office 177.1 5.21%
Commercial Industrial 134.7 3.96%
Suburban Commercial 74.8 2.20%
Light Commercial 66.6 1.96%
Heavy Industrial 37.6 1.11%
Research & Development 24.9 0.73%
Business Park 15.9 0.47%
Wellborn Commercial 13.5 0.40%
Business Park Industrial 7.4 0.22%
49
Page 60 of 108
Existing Land Use
Existing land use shows a substantial portion (40.83%) of the city’s land remains undeveloped or used for
agriculture. Currently, residential use makes up 33.23% (11,738.4 acres) of the city’s land, dominated by
single-family homes (80.69%). There are smaller percentages of multi-family housing (12.17%) and mixed-
use developments (0.15%). Existing commercial and industrial uses currently make up only 4.59% (1,619.9
acres) of land use, with commercial dominating this category.
Table 27: Acres of Existing Land Uses by Category; Source: Planning and Development Services
Existing Land Use Category Acres Percent
Undeveloped & Agricultural 14,422.1 40.83%
Residential 11,738.4 33.23%
Texas A&M University 5,339.2 15.11%
Civic 1,825.8 5.17%
Commercial & Industrial 1,619.9 4.59%
Other 379.6 1.07%
Undeveloped & Agricultural
Residential
Texas A&M University
Civic
Commercial & Industrial
Other
11,738.4
14,422.1
5,339.2
1,825.8
1,619.9
379.6
Figure 51: Existing Land Uses by Category; Source: Planning and Development Services
50
Page 61 of 108
0 1.50.75 Miles
DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
EXISTING LAND USE
IN THE CITY LIMITS
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (INCLUDING TOWNHOUSE)
DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL
MULTI-FAMILY
MIXED-USE
GROUP QUARTERS (NURSING HOME, DORM, ETC)
MOBILE/MANUFACTURED HOME
COMMERCIAL RETAIL (BANKS, HOTELS, ETC)
COMMERCIAL OFFICE
COMMERCIAL OTHER (AMUSEMENT,
SERVICE STATION, ETC)
COMMERCIAL - INDUSTRIAL
(WAREHOUSING/DISTRIBUTION)
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
PUBLIC FACILITIES (COCS, CSISD, LIBRARY, ETC)
SEMI-PUBLIC (RELIGIOUS, HOSPITALS, ETC)
TAMU (EASTERWOOD)
TRANSPORTATION, UTILITIES & COMMUNICATION
PARK (PRIVATE & PUBLIC)
GREENWAY
DRAINAGE
COMMON AREA
AGRICULTURAL
RURAL (LARGE LOT, >= 5 ACRES)
UNIMPROVED
Figure 52: Existing Land Uses; Source: City of College Station
Page 62 of 108
RESIDENTIAL
LAND USES
DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
021Miles
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (INCLUDING TOWNHOUSES)
DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL
MULTI-FAMILY
GROUP QUARTERS (NURSING HOMES, DORMS, ETC.)
MOB ILE/MANUFACTURED HOMES
EXISTING RESIDENTIAL LAND USES
College Station offers a variety of housing types, from single-
family homes on different lot sizes to apartments, duplexes, and
townhomes. About 32% of land in College Station is used for non-
rural residential. In addition to this increase in residential acreage, the
City has also seen projects with increased density, particularly in the
Northgate Redevelopment Area.
Figure 53: Existing Residential Uses by Type; Source: City of College Station
Table 28: Acres of Existing Residential Uses by Type; Source: City of College Station
Existing Residential
Uses by Type Acres Percent
Single-Family Residential 9472 80.69%
Multi-Family 1428.1 12.17%
Duplex Residential 389.1 3.31%
Mobile/Manufactured Home 356.6 3.04%
Group Quarters 75.4 0.64%
Mixed-Use 17.2 0.15%
Page 63 of 108
COMMERCIAL &
INDUSTRIAL
LAND USES
COMMERCIAL RETAIL (BANKS, HOTELS, ETC.)
COMMERCIAL OFFICE
COMMERCIAL OTHER (AMUSEMENT, SERVICE STATION, ETC.)
COMMERCIAL - INDUSTRIAL (WAREHOUSING/DISTRIBUTION)
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
EXISTING COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL LAND USES
DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
021Miles
Figure 54: Existing Commercial and Industrial Land Uses; Source: City of College Station
Just over half of the land area that has been planned for
commercial and industrial uses has been developed for
such uses. Approximately 1,920 acres of land within College
Station have been commercially or industrially developed, the
majority for retail commercial uses.
Table 29: Existing Commercial and Industrial Land Uses; Source: City of College Station
Existing Commercial/Industrial
Uses by Type Acres Percent
Commercial Retail 1149 54.51%
Commercial Office 390 18.50%
Commercial Other 329.8 15.65%
Light Industrial 151 7.17%
Commercial - Industrial 88 4.17%
Page 64 of 108
UNDEVELOPED &
AGRICULTURAL
LAND USES
DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
021Miles
AGRICULTURAL
RURAL (LARGE LOTS, >= 5 ACRES)
UNIMPROVED
EXISTING UNDEVELOPED, RURAL
& AGRICULTURAL LAND USES
Agricultural land accounts for 528.3 acres, representing 3.66% of
the total land use in this category. Undeveloped, unplatted land
makes up the largest share, totaling 8,557.1 acres or 59.33% of the
area. Undeveloped platted land follows with 2,715.6 acres (18.83%).
Rural land, defined as large lots of five acres or more, covers 1,627.4
acres, equivalent to 11.28%. Finally, common areas encompass
993.6 acres, representing 6.89%.
Figure 55: Existing Undeveloped and Agricultural Land Uses; Source: City of College Station
Table 30: Existing Undeveloped and Agricultural Land Uses; Source: City of College Station
Existing Undeveloped and
Agricultural Uses by Type Acres Percent
Undeveloped Unplatted 8557 59.33%
Undeveloped Platted 2716 18.83%
Rural 1627 11.28%
Common Area 994 6.89%
Agricultural 528 3.66%
Page 65 of 108
Parks constitute the largest portion of civic uses, covering 1,501.6 acres or 45.13% of the total. Public
facilities account for 997.1 acres, representing 29.97%, followed by semi-public spaces at 459.2 acres
(13.80%). Greenways, which include open and natural spaces, make up the smallest share, totaling 369.3
acres or 11.10%.
Table 31: Existing Civic Uses by Type; Source: City of College Station
Existing Civic Uses by Type Acres Percent
Parks 1502 45.13%
Public Facilities 997 29.97%
Semi-Public 460 13.80%
Greenways 369 11.10%
55
Page 66 of 108
PUBLIC FACILITIES
The City plans, maintains and invests in the infrastructure, facilities, services, personnel, and equipment
required to meet projected needs and opportunities to accommodate growth. This section includes updated
information regarding electric, water, wastewater, sanitation, police, fire, parks, K-12 education, and higher
education related to the city’s growth and development patterns.
Public Lands and City Facilities
The City has 152 municipal buildings and 73 park areas. Park areas cover 2,004.6 acres of land and
consist of 50 neighborhood parks, 15 community parks, 6 recreational areas, and 2 cemeteries. College
Station Independent School District (CSISD) has 19 school properties and Texas A&M University has 130
properties, including Easterwood Airport.
56
Page 67 of 108
PARKS*
CEMETERIES
CITY LIMITS
K-12 EDUCATION*
TAMU PROPERTY*
* More detailed maps on the following pages
4
1
2
3
4 5
6
7 8
9 10
11 12 13 14 15
16 17
18
19 20
21
MUNICIPAL COURT11
UTILITY CUSTOMER SERVICE12
POLICE STATION13
PARKS & RECREATION14
CARTER CREEK WWTP15
SOUTHWOOD COMMUNITY CENTER16
UTILITY SERVICE CENTER17
FIRE STATION #318
ARTS CENTER19
FIRE STATION #520
LICK CREEK WWTP21
LARRY J RINGER LIBRARY9
FIRE STATION #210
LINCOLN RECREATION CENTER6
FIRE STATION #17
MEYER SENIOR & COMMUNITY CENTER8
VISITOR CENTER5
FIRE STATION #62
FIRE STATION #43
CITY HALL4
NORTHGATE PARKING GARAGE1
CITY FACILITY BUILDINGS
PUBLIC LANDS &
CITY FACILITIES
SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
021Miles
Figure 56: Public Lands & City Facilities Map; Source: City of College Station
Page 68 of 108
Electric
College Station’s primary electric provider is
College Station Utilities (CSU), which is a wholesale
power purchaser and does not have generation
capabilities. The data on electricity consumption
and infrastructure in College Station offers insights
into the city’s energy demand and the capacity of its
electrical system. Over the years, annual electricity
consumption has steadily increased, reflecting
growth in population, development, and economic
activities. The consumption figures, from 913 million
kWh in 2019 to just under 1 billion kWh in 2023,
signify a consistent rise in energy needs. The peak
in 2022 at 998.4 million kWh suggests that both
residential and commercial activities have surged in
recent years.
Table 32: Annual Electric Consumption; Source: College Station Utilities
Year KwH (in Millions)
2019 913
2020 884
2021 919
2022 998
2023 993
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
YearKwH in MillionsFigure 57: Annual Electric Consumption; Source: College Station Utilities
Figure 58: Electric Service Indicators
College Station’s electrical infrastructure
includes 548 miles of electrical lines,
supported by 8 substations, serving a total
of 44,654 customers—41,038 residential
and 3,616 commercial. This indicates a
robust distribution network designed
to meet both the current and growing
energy demands. Figure 84 highlights the
utility service areas within College Station,
showcasing how the infrastructure is
spread across the city.
58
Page 69 of 108
ELECTRIC SERVICE
AREAS
021Miles
DATA SOURCE: PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS
COLLEGE STATION UTILITIES
BRYAN TEXAS UTILITIES
MIDSOUTH ELECTRIC CO-OP
CITY LIMITS
ETJ
Figure 59: Electric Service Area Map; Source: Public Utility Commission of Texas
Page 70 of 108
Water Services
WATER
College Station pumps water from deep wells located on city-owned land over the Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer,
in the Carrizo, Sparta, and Simsboro Sand formations. College Station disinfects its drinking water with gas
chlorine to provide an effective chlorine residual. After the water is disinfected, it is pumped into the water
distribution system, which includes elevated storage tanks. The elevated storage tanks provide an adequate
supply of water pressure for homes, businesses, and fire protection within the College Station water
certificated area (CCN).
College Station’s water system includes over 490 miles of water distribution lines, 10 groundwater wells,
2 pump stations, 2 ground water storage tanks, and 3 elevated storage tanks. The water system is rated
“Superior” by the State of Texas and has received awards for outstanding operations and maintenance from
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The city has approximately 117,571 residential water consumers
and sees an average consumption of 130 GPCD per person per day. Notably, the City saw annual water
consumption exceed 5,000 million gallons of water starting in 2022. Due to the recent increase in water
consumption, the average annual water consumption between 2019 and 2023 was 5,004.92 million gallons.
Currently the City has approved well permits for the construction of three new groundwater wells.
Water consumption also reflects a growth pattern, with usage steadily increasing from around 4,000 million
gallons (MG) in 2014 to over 5,900 MG in 2022.
Figure 60: Water Consumption by Year; Source: College Station Water Services
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
YearMG
60
Page 71 of 108
0 2.51.25 Miles
WATER SERVICE
AREAS
DATA SOURCE: PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS
PARK PLACE
ROCK PRAIRIE
GREENS PRAIRIE
COLLEGE STATION UTILITIES
WATER TOWER
CITY OF BRYAN
WELLBORN SUD
CITY LIMITS
ETJ
WICKSON CREEK SUD
Figure 61: Water Service Areas; Source: Public Utility Commission of Texas
Page 72 of 108
Wastewater
The City’s wastewater collection system consists of a network of 397 miles of collector mains, interceptors and force mains, 17 lift stations, and three wastewater treatment facilities. The Carters Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP)
has a current permitted capacity of 9.5 MGD average daily flow. The Lick Creek WWTP has a current permitted capacity of 5 MGD average daily flow. All water leaving College Station’s wastewater treatment facilities must meet regulatory
limits set by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the permits for each wastewater treatment facility. Wastewater in College Station is treated using screening and grit
removal (to remove grease, grit and large objects), aeration, clarification, biosolids digestion and dewatering, and disinfection.
Figure 62: Wastewater Service Areas; Source: Public Utility Commission of Texas
WASTEWATER
SERVICE AREAS
021Miles
DATA SOURCE: PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS
COLLEGE STATION UTILITIES
CITY OF BRYAN
CITY LIMITS
ETJ
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
CARTER CREEK
CARTER
LAKE
LICK CREEK
Page 73 of 108
Solid Waste
The Cities of Bryan and College Station joined together in 1990 to create the Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency. BVSWMA operates from the Twin Oaks Landfill, a Subtitle D landfill situated on 610-acres off of Highway 30 in
Grimes County. Recycling is currently contracted to BVR Waste and Recycling for single-family residences. Each residential customer receives weekly services for garbage, bulk trash and brush, and recycling.
Figure 63: Twin Oaks Landfill; Source: Brazos Central Appraisal District
BVSWMA PROPERTY
CITY LIMITS
TWIN OAKS
LANDFILL
DATA SOURCE: BRAZOS CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT
021Miles
TWIN OAKS
SH 30
S
H
6FM 60FM
2
1
5
4 SH 40S
H
6
Page 74 of 108
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
5,723
24,415
5,527
28,435
6,044
30,746
5,516
28,218
5,467
29,343
Residential Recycling (Tons)
Garbage Collected (Tons)
Garbage Collected (Tons) Residential Recycling (Tons)
Figure 64: Residential Tons of Garbage and Recycling Collected by Year; Source: City of College Station
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
70,000
60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
5,000
0
16,912
42,423
18,977
36,434
19,035
42,975
20,083
44,354
18,662
44,196
Commercial Recycling (Tons)Commercial Garbage (Tons)
Commercial Garbage (Tons) Commercial Recycling (Tons)
Figure 65: Commercial Tons of Garbage and Recycling Collected by Year; Source: City of College Station
The total tons of garbage collected annually have seen fluctuations. Residential garbage increased notably
from 2019 to 2021, peaking at 30,745.8 tons in 2021 before declining slightly in 2022 and 2023. Commercial
garbage also fluctuated, with a significant dip in 2020 (36,433.7 tons) likely due to reduced commercial
activity during the pandemic. Collection volumes rebounded in 2021 and remained stable in 2022 and
2023. Residential recycling peaked in 2021 at 6,044 tons but declined slightly in the subsequent years.
Commercial recycling increased steadily from 2019 to 2022, reaching 20,083.1 tons, but saw a decline in
2023 to 18,662 tons.
64
Page 75 of 108
CITY PARKS & PUBLIC ART
0 1.50.75 Miles
DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
SCULPTURES
DIANA'S QUEST4 SERVICE WITH HONOR16
ETERNAL WINDS5 SKY CUTTER17
FFA DONOR WALL6 SPIRIT GATE18
FREE FLIGHT7 STAKING THE CLAIM19
GENESIS8 TIGER PRIDE20
HALFTIME9 VETERAN'S MEMORIAL21
AGGIE SPIRIT1 OUR LADY OF VICTORY13
CAMBRIA2 PETUNIA14
CHILDREN OF PEACE3 SERVICE WITH COURAGE15
HOLD ON10 22 WAR ON TERRORL
I "HEART" AGGIELANDT11 23 WILDERNESS AWAKENED
LYNN STUART PATHWAYSCULPTURES12 24 XIGGEROTTS
DEVELOPED PARKS
ETONBURY21
30 LIONS
31 LONGMIRE
27 JOHN CROMPTON
28 LEMONTREE
29 LICK CREEK
26 JACK & DOROTHY MILLER
23 GABBARD
24 GEORGIE K FITCH
25 GREENS PRAIRIE RESERVE
22 FIRST DOWN
32 LUTHER JONES
33 MERRY OAKS
34 MIDTOWN RESERVE
35 NORTHGATE
36 OAKS
ANDERSON1 37 PARKWAY
ART & MYRA BRIGHT2 38 PEBBLE CREEK
BARRACKS II3 39 PHILLIPS
BEE CREEK4 40 REATTA MEADOWS
BILLIE MADELEY5 41 RICHARD CARTER
BRIAN BACHMANN6 42 SANDSTONE
BRIDGEWOOD7 43 SOUTHERN OAKS
BRISON8 44 SOUTHWEST
BROTHERS POND9 45 STEEPLECHASE
CARTER'S CROSSING10 46 STEPHEN C BEACHY CENTRAL
CASTLE ROCK11 47 THOMAS
CASTLEGATE12 48 UNIVERSITY
COVE OF NANTUCKET13 49 VETERANS PARK &
ATHLETIC COMPLEX
CREEK VIEW14 50 W A TARROW
CRESCENT POINTE15 51 WALLACE LAKE
CY MILLER16 52 WILDWOOD
EASTGATE17 53 WINDWOOD
EDELWEISS18 54 WOLF PEN CREEK
EDELWEISS GARTENS19 55 WOODCREEK
EMERALD FOREST20 56 WOODLAND HILLS
22 23
24
25
26
16
17
18
19
20
21
9
10
6
7
8
5
2
3
4
1
11
12
13
14
15
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35 36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
22
23
24
16
17
18
19
20
21
9
10
6
7
8
5
2
3
4
1
11
12
13
14
15
DEVELOPED PARKS
UNDEVELOPED PARKS
SCULPTURES#
Figure 66: Parks and Monuments; Source: City of College Station
Parks and Recreation
Page 76 of 108
The City of College Station provides parks and recreational opportunities through its Parks and Recreation
Department, whose mission is “to provide a diversity of facilities and leisure services that are geographically
and demographically accessible.” The department is responsible for the design, construction, and operation
of park facilities, along with the development and implementation of recreation programs.
College Station has extensive parkland and recreational amenities, with a total of 1,895.35 acres of parkland
spread across 58 parks and supported by 70 buildings and facilities. The city boasts a well-distributed
network of neighborhood parks (50), community parks (15), recreational areas (6), and cemeteries (2),
catering to diverse community needs. Key features include various specialized facilities, such as three
disc golf courses located in Oaks, Wolf Pen Creek, and Southern Oaks Parks, offering both recreational
and social engagement opportunities. Wolf Pen Creek, the largest of these parks, spans 63.71 acres, while
Southern Oaks and Oaks Parks are smaller but provide accessible 9-hole courses.
The City also supports active recreation with facilities such as pickleball courts in Brian Bachmann and
Bee Creek Parks. Brian Bachmann Park, covering 42.32 acres, stands out with its wide array of amenities,
including a community pool, multiple sports fields, and a pavilion, making it a hub for community activity.
Similarly, Bee Creek Park’s 44.60 acres house softball fields, playgrounds, and trails, emphasizing multi-
functional recreational spaces. Paved trails are a staple in most parks, while unpaved trails in Lick Creek,
Bee Creek, and Billie Madeley Parks offer opportunities for nature exploration.
Page 77 of 108
Law Enforcement and Emergency Services
POLICE
The College Station Police Department (CSPD) is primarily responsible for the protection of life, liberty,
and property for people that are within the City limits. It provides these services through various means
including enforcement of criminal laws and ordinances, providing education, recovery of property, animal
control, traffic enforcement, and investigation of crimes.
CSPD is made up of three bureaus: the Administrative Services Bureau, Field Operations Bureau, and
Operational Support Bureau. The Administrative Services Bureau includes many different divisions within
the department that supplement and enhance the overall operations of the department. These include
divisions for Information Services, Communications, Support Services, and Technical Services. The Field
Operations Bureau is the largest bureau in CSPD and encompasses uniformed patrol, police assistants,
traffic enforcement unit, and the College Station Tourism and Entertainment Policing. The Uniformed Patrol
Division is the largest division in CSPD and includes 91 Officers, 13 Sergeants, 3 Lieutenants, 2 K9s, and a
Drone Team. The Operational Support Bureau includes the Criminal Investigations Division, the Recruiting
and Training Division, and the Special Operations Division.
The College Station Police Department (CSPD) has been accredited by the Commission on Accreditation
for Law Enforcement Agencies (CALEA) since 1991. The CSPD has an Advanced certification and a
Meritorious designation. CALEA accreditation recognizes agencies that demonstrate professionalism,
integrity, and other qualities. The CSPD’s Communication Division was the first accredited program of its
kind in Texas in 2003. The CSPD recently received reaccreditation awards for law enforcement and public
safety communications.
67
Page 78 of 108
POLICE TERRITORY
ASSIGNMENTS
021Miles
DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
12
7
10
8
9
11
1
4
2
3
5
6
0
POLICE BEATS
POLICE STATION
POLICE FACILITIES
Figure 67: Police Beats Map; Source: City of College Station
Page 79 of 108
CSPD officers are assigned to sectors and beats.
The structure divides the City into three sectors. The
sectors are further divided into beats with a total of
twelve beats. Two Community Enhancement Unit
(CEU) Officers are assigned to each sector. The CEU
Officers have primary responsibility for the quality of
life and crime issues affecting their assigned sectors.
Patrol Officers are assigned to beats or sectors for
the duration of each shift, with officers regularly
being assigned to the same areas for familiarity.
Table 33: Major Offenses 2019-2023
Offense Count
Murder 3
Robbery 8
Burglaries 643
Vehicle Burglaries 449
Sexual Assault 84
Theft of a Firearm 105
Aggressive Assault 97
Alcohol-related
Non-reportable
Fatality
Minor
Major
96
170
4
972
599
Non-Traic Warnings
Traic Warnings
Non-Traic Citations
Traic Citations
1,559
16,533
4,226
10,942
Figure 68: Traffic Accidents 2023; Source: City of College Station
Figure 69: Citations and Warnings 2023; Source: City of College Station
ARRESTS AND CITATIONS
TRAFFIC AND ACCIDENTS
69
Page 80 of 108
Fire
The College Station Fire Department (CSFD) provides prevention, suppression, advanced life support,
emergency medical services and transport, community risk reduction programs, and special operations
along with Advanced Life Support to the southern half of Brazos County and fire suppression to the
Texas A&M campus. CSFD employed 166 professional staff. CSFD has one building facility (dispatch
and administration) and six fire stations. CSFD staffs 5 fire engines, 2 platform ladder trucks, 1 quint,
4 ambulances, 1 water tender, 1 airport truck, 1 safety officer, and 3 battalion chiefs. Additionally, the
department operates special teams that includes hazardous materials, wildland, swift water, bicycle
response, medical task force, and search and rescue. A seventh fire station is currently in the development
process.
CSFD is an accredited agency by the Commission on Fire Accreditation International (CFAI). CFAI
determines accreditation by ensuring CSFD meets or exceeds the highest standards of performance and
safety and requires reaccreditation every five years. Additionally, CSFD holds an Insurance Service Office
(ISO) Class 1/8Y Public Protection Classification (PPC) rating. Effective April 1, 2019, an ISO Class 1 Rating
places CSFD in the top-tier of agencies in the United States that provide fire protection. The enhanced
rating validates that fire protection, water service, and communications are in the top-tier. The PPC score
is a measure of the community’s overall ability to reduce property losses due to fires. The scale of a
PPC rating ranges from 1-10, with Class 1 being the highest rating. Finally, College Station has a premier
collection of emergency response training facilities in its backyard: Brayton Fire Training Field, Disaster
City®, and the Emergency Operations Training Center — all operated by the Texas A&M Engineering
Extension Service (TEEX).
Emergency Medical Services (EMS) of the CSFD ensures that all department vehicles, including
ambulances, fire engines, and ladder trucks have the capability to perform advanced-level medical care
up to the Mobile Intensive Care Unit (MICU) level. The capabilities of these units include defibrillation,
cardioversion, pacing, ECG and EKG interpretation, IV therapy, IO Access, medication administration,
advanced airway management and intubation, chest decompression, and other advanced skills. CSFD EMS
provides Medical Standy for community events.
Since the City’s last fire station opened in 2012, the population has grown by 34%, and the call volume for
emergency fire/EMS services has increased by 83%. The proposed $18M fire station #7 will be strategically
located to improve response times in the City’s southern portion.
70
Page 81 of 108
FIRE DISTRICTS
& STATIONS
021Miles
DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
FIRE DISTRICTS
1
6
4
A
2
3
5
7*
FIRE FACILITIES
FUTURE FIRE STATION*
EXISTING FIRE STATION#
FIRE ADMINA
Figure 70: Fire Districts and Stations; Source: City of College Station
Page 82 of 108
FIRE DEPARTMENT AND EMS ACTIVITY
The fire department’s activities highlight a diverse set of responsibilities. In 2023, fire calls numbered
251, while public assistance/service calls (1,098) and false alarms (1,171) formed a substantial share of
their workload, showcasing their broader community role. Specialized incidents like hazardous materials
cases (355) and technical rescues (71) point to the complexity of modern fire service operations. The EMS
breakdown shows 7,072 total calls attended to 8,561 patients, with significant emphasis on advanced life
support (6,065 cases) and transports (5,576 cases).
Figure 71: 2023 Fire Department Calls by Type; Source: City of College Station
Public K-12 Education
College Station Independent School District (CSISD) has been a consolidated district since 1941, when
the public school was moved from the Texas A&M University campus to facilities on Timber Street. The
district encompasses approximately 102 square miles in the southern portion of Brazos County, and it is
fully accredited by the Texas Education Agency. CSISD operates three high schools, three middle schools,
three intermediate schools, and ten elementary schools across College Station. The school district has also
constructed a 44-acre transportation facility off William D. Fitch Parkway.
Other
False Alarm
Good Intent
Motor Vehicle Accidents
Public Assist/Service
Fire
Hazardous Materials
Technical Rescues
Explosions/Overheats
Aircraft Rescues/Standbys
Animal Rescues
4
1,171
1,091
743
1,098
251
355
71
19
17
4
72
Page 83 of 108
021Miles
SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
K-12 EDUCATION
1 COLLEGE HILLS
2 CREEK VIEW
3 FOREST RIDGE
4 GREENS PRAIRIE
5 PEBBLE CREEK
6 RIVER BEND
7 ROCK PRAIRIE
8 SOUTH KNOLL
9 SOUTHWOOD VALLEY
10 SPRING CREEK
11 CYPRESS GROVE
12 OAKWOOD
13 PECAN TRAIL
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
INTERMEDIATE SCHOOLS
MIDDLE SCHOOLS
HIGH SCHOOLS
14 A&M CONSOLIDATED
15 COLLEGE STATION
16 WELLBORN
A&M CONSOLIDATED17
COLLEGE STATION18
COLLEGE VIEW19
20 INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIPOF TEXAS HIGH SCHOOL
INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIPOF TEXAS K-8 SCHOOL
CHARTER SCHOOLS
21
1
2
3
4
56
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Figure 72: CSISD Facilities; Source: City of College Station
Page 84 of 108
The data for the CSISD highlights growth in educational outcomes and resource allocation. For the 2023-
2024 school year, the district served 14,430 students across its elementary, intermediate, middle, and high
schools, with high schools seeing the largest enrollment at 4,423 students. 31% of enrolled students were
in high school, 15% in middle school, 14% in intermediate, and 40% in elementary. Graduation rates have
consistently increased over the years, climbing from 91.9% in 2014 to 95.1% in 2022.
College Station’s first public charter school, International Leadership of Texas, has been open since the
2018-2019 school year. Two other school districts serve a small proportion of students in College Station
and its extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ). Generally, Bryan ISD serves College Station residents east of Carter
Creek and on the west side of Easterwood Airport. Navasota ISD serves the southernmost portion of
College Station’s ETJ, just south of Peach Creek.
Figure 73: 2023-2024 K-12 Enrollment; Source: College Station Independent School District
Figure 74: CSISD Graduate Rate 2014-2022; Source: College Station Independent School District
High School
Middle School
Intermediate School
Elementary School
4,423
2,169
2,016
5,822
96
95
94
93
92
91
90
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
74
Page 85 of 108
TRANSPORTATION
The average travel time to work in College Station is 18.8 minutes (ACS 2023), which is less than the
average travel time to work in Texas (27.2 minutes). Most residents’ means of transportation to work is to
drive alone (74.8%), while 6.3% carpool, 3.5% use public transit, 4% walk, 2.3% travel by bicycle, and 8%
work remotely.
The availability of vehicles among residents also highlights the area’s demographic characteristics. About
5.5% of occupied housing units have no vehicles available, while 37.2% of units have one vehicle, and 38.1%
have two vehicles.
Thoroughfares
College Station’s economic vitality, character, and identity rely on a well-connected transportation system.
The City’s thoroughfare network applies context-sensitive design principles to address multi-modal
transportation needs while aligning with land use and character objectives.
The Thoroughfare Plan, part of the Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 6: Mobility), outlines a long-term vision
for the major street network required to support future mobility demands. It serves as a guide for future
transportation investments and classifies roadways based on their function, including access to adjacent
land uses, mobility for through traffic, and surrounding context. The plan identifies the locations of
planned and existing roadways classified as minor collectors or higher within College Station and its ETJ
(extraterritorial jurisdiction).
75
Page 86 of 108
THOROUGHFARE PLAN
0 2.51.25 Miles
DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
FREEWAY/EXPRESSWAY
PROPOSED FREEWAY/EXPRESSWAY
6 LANE MAJOR ARTERIAL
PROPOSED 6 LANE MAJOR ARTERIAL
4 LANE MAJOR ARTERIAL
PROPOSED 4 LANE MAJOR ARTERIAL
MINOR ARTERIAL
PROPOSED MINOR ARTERIAL
MAJOR COLLECTOR
PROPOSED MAJOR COLLECTOR
MINOR COLLECTOR
PROPOSED MINOR COLLECTOR
CITY LIMITS
ETJ
PROPOSED GRADE SEPARATED CROSSING
GRADE SEPARATED CROSSING UNIVERSITY DRGEORGE BUSH DRFM 60F
M
2
1
5
4
PRAIRIEHARVEY RDWILLIAM D FITCH PKWYSH 30
HOLLEMAN DR
SBARRON RDGREENS PRAIRIE RD S
H
6
S
H
6
RD
ROCK
FM
2
1
5
4
TE
X
A
S
A
V
E
S
FM 2818F
M
2
8
1
8
Figure 75: Thoroughfare Plan Map; Source: City of College Station
Page 87 of 108
Figure 76: Thoroughfare Expansions and Improvements Map; Source: City of College Station
FUTURE THOROUGHFARES
& EXPANSIONS
0 2.51.25 Miles
DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
FUTURE EXPANSIONS
FUTURE THOROUGHFARES
CITY LIMITS
ETJ
FUTURE GRADE SEPARATED CROSSINGS UNIVERSITY DRGEORGE BUSH DRFM 60FM
2
1
5
4
PRAIRIEHARVEY RDWILLIAM D FITCH PKWYSH 30
HOLLEMAN DR
SBARRON RDGREENS PRAIRIE RD SH
6
S
H
6
RD
ROCK
FM
2
1
5
4
TE
X
A
S
A
V
E
S
FM 2818
F
M
2
8
1
8
EALGE AVEGRAHAM RDGRAHAM RDDEACONDRUNIVERSITY DR EHOLLEMAN DRSOUTH
WE
S TPKWYPage 88 of 108
The Future Thoroughfare and Expansions Map outlines future thoroughfare plans and expansions within the
City of College Station. Future road expansions aim to improve connectivity, particularly in areas currently
underserved by major roads. Proposed grade separated crossings are strategically placed to reduce
congestion and improve safety at major intersections or railroad crossings. The planned infrastructure
also aims to accommodate growth outside the existing municipal boundaries. The Plan highlights a
concentration of thoroughfare development along major routes such as Rock Prairie Road and FM 2154.
The future thoroughfares are designed to enhance regional connectivity, linking College Station with
neighboring areas, particularly along SH 30 and other routes heading outward.
PARKING
Off-street parking requirements are detailed in the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) under Article
5 (“District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards,”) and Article 7 (“General Development
Standards,”). On August 10, 2023, the City of College Station adopted Ordinance #2023-4454, which
updated the off-street parking requirements as follows:
1. established off-street parking maximums for commercial parking;
2. reduced the minimum off-street parking required for commercial parking in half; and
3. removed minimum requirement for off-street parking for commercial developments that are in
Redevelopment areas.
On-street parking is generally permitted in both residential and non-residential areas if streets meet specific
standards to ensure emergency access (UDO Section 8.3.V). Specifically, streets wider than 27 feet allow
parking on both sides, streets 24 to 27 feet wide permit parking on one side, and streets narrower than 24
feet have parking removed on both sides. In the Northgate District, 104 marked ParkMobile spaces are
available on Nagle, Stasney, Tauber, Lodge, and Cross streets.
TRAFFIC
The Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) is a critical metric to understand traffic flow dynamics. The data
analyzed are from 2023. Stations on Highway 6 show consistent increases in AADT over the years. These
stations report recent values exceeding 70,000 vehicles per day, highlighting the corridor’s significance as a
major arterial route. Some routes, such as Harvey Mitchell Parkway, show significant year-to-year variation,
reflecting potential external influences such as the academic calendar of Texas A&M University. Some
roads, particularly minor or regional routes, show declining traffic or stagnation.
78
Page 89 of 108
2023 ESTIMATED DAILY
TRAFFIC VOLUME
DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
021MilesFM 60FM
2
8
1
8
FM 2154SH 40SH
6
S
H
6 HARVEY RDUNIVERSITY DRGEORGE BUSH DRFM
215
4
FM 281 8TE
XAS
AV
E
S
ROCK PRAIRIE RD
GREENS PRAIRIE RDBARRON RDEAGLE AVEGRAHAM RDDEACON DRSOUTHWEST PKWYHOLLEMAN DR
SF
M
2
1
5
4 UNIVERSITY DRE0-5,000
5,001-15,000
15,001-25,000
25,001-40,000
40,001-65,000
65,001 +
NUMBER OF
VEHICLES PER DAY
Figure 77: Estimated Daily Traffic Volume Map; Source: Texas Department of Transportation
Page 90 of 108
HIGHWAYS
Traffic stations on Highway 6 consistently report the highest AADT values, with volumes exceeding 60,000
to 70,000 vehicles daily. This reflects its importance as a major thoroughfare for long-distance and regional
travel. Traffic fluctuations between years may indicate periodic maintenance or alternate routing during
construction.
MAJOR ROADS
Traffic along Harvey Mitchell Parkway (FM 2818) varies. AADT values range from 20,000 to 40,000
depending on the segment. Major arterial roadways like Texas Avenue, University Drive, and Harvey Mitchell
Parkway highlight higher traffic volumes in proximity to city centers and intersections. Moderate but steady
traffic is reported along University Drive (FM 60), with stations reporting AADT around 30,000.
COLLECTOR ROADS
Traffic levels are significantly lower on collector roads. These roads typically range from 1,000 to 10,000
AADT depending on the segment. Examples include Longmire (3,936 AADT) and Lincoln (5,255 AADT).
GEOSPATIAL TRAFFIC PATTERNS
Traffic patterns can be spatially analyzed, and three primary themes emerge: urban core traffic, periphery
roads traffic, and directional variations in traffic (Figure 82). Stations near the city’s core report the highest
AADT values. This aligns with the density of development and associated economic activities. As distance
from the City increases, traffic volumes decrease. Finally, northbound and southbound lanes sometimes
show differing AADT, indicating directional traffic surges likely driven by commuting patterns.
80
Page 91 of 108
Crashes
Analyzing crash patterns can help us identify crash locations, severity, road types, and intersections with
the highest crash occurrences.
CRASH LOCATIONS
The distribution of crashes by location from 2019 to 2023 reveals several trends (Figure 78). Non-
Intersection Areas account for the highest number of crashes, nearing 10,000 incidents in the five-year
period. Intersections follow as the second most common crash location, highlighting the need for enhanced
traffic management at these points. Intersection-Related Crashes (occurring near intersections) also
contribute significantly, suggesting challenges in areas transitioning into or out of intersections. Driveway
Access Points have the fewest crashes, but they still represent a noteworthy safety concern for vehicles
entering or exiting properties.
Figure 78: Crashes by Intersection Code, 2019-2023; Source: City of College Station
CRASH SEVERITY
The most common category for crash severity is the “Not Injured” category, with over 11,000 cases between
2019 and 2023. In this time frame, 96% crashes in the City are categorized as minor crashes, including
crashes that had suspected minor injuries, possible injuries, or no injuries. Suspected Minor Injuries are the
second most common outcome, followed by Possible Injuries. Fatalities and Serious Injuries are relatively
rare. 2.86% of crashes in College Station were categorized as major crashes. Major crashes include those
that have fatalities or suspected serious injuries.
NON INTERSECTION
INTERSECTION RELATED
INTERSECTION
DRIVEWAY ACCESS
9,483
4,997
6,706
2,109
NOT INJURED
FATAL INJURY
POSSIBLE INJURY
SUSPECTED MINOR INJURY
SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY
UNKNOWN 250
547
5,250
3,608
54
11,293
Figure 79: Crashes by Severity; Source: Texas Department of Transportation
81
Page 92 of 108
CRASH DATA
CRASH DENSITY
MIDLOW HIGH DATA SOURCE: TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
0 1.50.75 Miles
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 TEXAS AVE & POPLAR ST
2 WELLBORN RD & GEORGE BUSH DR
3 HOLLEMAN DR S & HARVEY MITCHELL PKWY S
4 SH 6 S & UNIVERSITY DR E
5 TEXAS AVE S & HOLLEMAN DR E
6 TEXAS AVE & LINCOLN AVE
7 TEXAS AVE S & HARVEY MITCHELL PKWY S
8 TEXAS AVE S & SOUTHWEST PKWY E
9 SH 6 S & HARVEY RD
10 SH 6 S & ROCK PRAIRIE RD
TOP 10 INTERSECTIONS WITH CRASHES
TOP 10 INTERSECTIONS
The intersections with the highest crash frequencies include Texas Avenue and Poplar Street, Wellborn Road and George Bush Road, and Holleman Dr South and Harvey Mitchell Parkway South. Texas Avenue S and Poplar Street ranks as
the most crash-prone intersection, which is heavily influenced by the number of crashes at intersections directly North and South of the intersection (e.g., Texas and University and Texas and Live Oak intersections, respectively). In response
to the high number of crashes at that intersection, the median opening at Texas Avenue and Live Oak Street was closed in 2024 and crashes have since decreased in this area and are expected to continue this decline in crashes in the
future. Wellborn Road and George Bush Road and other intersections along major thoroughfares like Texas Avenue and Earl Rudder Freeway feature prominently in the top 10.
Figure 80: Intersection Crash Hotspots Map
Table 34: Top Ten Intersection Crash Hotspots; Source: Texas Department of Transportation
Rank Intersection
1 Texas Ave / Poplar St
2 Wellborn Rd / George Bush Rd
3 Holleman Dr S / Harvey Mitchell Pw S
4 Earl Rudder Fwy S / University Dr E
5 Texas Ave / Holleman Dr E
6 Texas Ave / Lincoln Ave
7 Texas Ave / Harvey Mitchell Pw S
8 Texas Ave / Southwest Pw E
9 Earl Rudder Fwy S / Harvey Rd
10 Earl Rudder Fwy S / Rock Prairie Rd
Page 93 of 108
Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility
The City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Program aims to improve
connectivity and accessibility, enhance safety, promote outdoor
activity, and encourage environmental stewardship. Currently,
the city maintains 57.7 miles of bike lanes, 21.2 miles of bike
routes, 387.7 miles of sidewalks, and 40.6 miles of multiuse
paths.
BICYCLE PLAN
The City contains a network of existing bicycle lanes
concentrated in urbanized areas and major corridors. This
indicates current efforts to facilitate bicycle commuting within
the city core. Existing shared-use paths complement bicycle
lanes, offering additional off-road options for cyclists and
connecting recreational spaces or less urbanized areas.
83
Page 94 of 108
BICYCLE PLAN
021Miles
DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
PROPOSED GRADE SEPARATED CROSSINGS
FUNDED GRADE SEPARATED CROSSINGS
EXISTING GRADE SEPARATED CROSSINGS
EXISTING BICYCLE LANES
FUNDED BICYCLE FACILITIES*
PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITIES*
EXISTING BICYCLE ROUTES
PROPOSED BICYCLE ROUTES
EXISTING SHARED USE PATHS
FUNDED SHARED USE PATHS
PROPOSED SHARED USE PATHS
CITY LIMITS
ETJ
*Bicycle facilities could be bicycle lanes, buered bicycle lanes, or separated bicycle lanes.
Figure 81: Bicycle Plan Map; Source: Planning and Development Services
Page 95 of 108
The large network of proposed bicycle facilities (dashed red) and proposed bicycle routes indicates
significant future investment to fill gaps in the current infrastructure. The proposed infrastructure focuses on
extending connectivity into peripheral areas, including the ETJ.
Table 35: Bike Plan Category by Total Miles; Source: City of College Station
Bike Category Miles
Bike Facility Proposed 87.42
Bike Lane Existing 56.55
Bike Lane Funded 4.54
Bike Route Existing 21.17
Bike Route Proposed 70.41
Multi-use Path Existing 41.21
Multi-use Path Funded 14.65
Multi-use Path Proposed 82.85
The combination of shared-use paths and dedicated bicycle facilities reflects a multi-modal approach,
supporting both pedestrian and bicycle traffic. In 2020, the City was designated a bronze level “Bicycle
Friendly Community” by the League of American Bicyclists. In 2024, the City received the recognition again,
as well as the silver level “Bicycle Friendly Business” designation for the new City Hall constructed in 2021.
85
Page 96 of 108
Figure 82: Pedestrian Plan Map; Source: City of College Station
PROPOSED GRADE SEPARATED CROSSINGS
FUNDED GRADE SEPARATED CROSSINGS
EXISTING GRADE SEPARATED CROSSINGS
EXISTING SIDEWALKS
FUNDED SIDEWALKS
PROPOSED SIDEWALKS
EXISTING SHARED USE PATHS
FUNDED SHARED USE PATHS
PROPOSED SHARED USE PATHS
CITY LIMITS
ETJ
PEDESTRIAN PLAN
021Miles
DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
PEDESTRIAN PLAN
A robust network of existing sidewalks is already in place, particularly in the city center and key corridors. Existing shared-use paths are primarily located along major routes or connecting recreational and urban spaces, supporting both
pedestrians and cyclists. A smaller number of existing grade-separated crossings indicate limited infrastructure for safe pedestrian crossings over high-traffic or natural barriers. Proposed grade-separated crossings at critical points signal
efforts to improve pedestrian safety where traffic or topographic barriers exist.
Table 36: Pedestrian Plan Category by Total Miles; Source: City of College Station
Pedestrian Category Miles
Multi-use Path Existing 40.75
Multi-use Path Funded 11.63
Multi-use Path Proposed 82.72
Sidewalk Existing 388.14
Sidewalk Funded 4.02
Sidewalk Proposed 86.59
Page 97 of 108
Bus Transit
BRAZOS TRANSIT DISTRICT
The Brazos Transit District (BTD) is a public transportation provider providing services to the seven counties
of the Brazos Valley. The BTD operates Fixed Routes, ADA Paratransit Service, and Demand and Response
transit options. BTD operates nine routes within the City of College Station (Brazos Transit District, 2024).
The ridership fluctuated in FY 2021, with total ridership at 1.5 million trips. Ridership increased substantially
in FY 2023, increasing to 5.88 million trips. There were notable declines in winter months and early summer,
with peaks in the late summer, likely due to seasonal variations such as student activity and the university.
1,000,000
900,000
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
20 Sep20 Oct20 Nov20 Dec20 Jan20 Feb20 Mar20 Apr20 May20 Jun20 Jul20 AugRidership Fiscal Year 2021 Ridership Fiscal Year 2023
Figure 83: Brazos Transit District Ridership FY21 vs FY23; Source: Texas Department of Transportation
87
Page 98 of 108
Texas A&M Transportation
Texas A&M University’s transit program, AggieSpirit Transit, operates a fleet of 92 full-size buses and 4
smaller buses. Of these, 70 buses are used for daily routes, while the remainder are designated for charters.
The buses accommodate approximately 35–40 passengers each, depending on the design and layout.
The transit system supports an estimated annual ridership of over 6.4 million. Daily ridership averages
18,000 on-campus passengers and 30,000 off-campus passengers across seven on-campus and twelve
off-campus routes.
Figure 84: Brazos Transit and Aggie Spirit Bus Routes; Source: City of College Station
BUS ROUTES
COLLEGE STATION CITY LIMITS
BRYAN CITY LIMITS
BRAZOS TRANSIT DISTRICT
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY
DATA SOURCE: BRAZOS TRANSIT DISTRICT & TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY
01.50.75 Miles
E WJB PKWY
FM
2
8
1
8
FM 60
FM
2
1
5
4 WILLIAM D FITCH PKWYHOLLEMAN DR
SBARRON RDGREENS PRAIRIE RD SH
6
SH
6
GRAHAM RDTE
X
A
S
A
V
E
SFM
2
8
1
8
S
H
6
ROCK PRAI
DEACONDR
S
C
O
L
L
E
G
E
A
V
E
S
T
E
X
A
S
A
V
E
N
T
E
X
A
S
A
V
E
FE
A
T
H
E
R
R
D
FI
N
FM
2
8
1
8 E SH 21W SH
21
SH
4
7 ERSITY DR EW VILLA MARIBRIARCREST DRW 28TH ST
UNIVEAGLE AVERIERD
MI
D
T
OWN
D
R
FM 2818HARVEY RDARDS
H
6
88
Page 99 of 108
Railroad
Union Pacific operates the rail line paralleling Wellborn Road. College Station has seven at-grade railroad crossings and two grade-separated crossings. Plans include the addition of three more grade-separated crossings, replacing two
existing at-grade crossings.
Figure 85: Railroad Crossings Map; Source: City of College Station
RAILROAD CROSSINGS
010.5 MilesF&B RDFM 60GEORGE BUSH DRUNIVERSITY DRFM 281 8 FM 2818ROYDER RD
SH 6
HOLLEMAN DRSOUTHWESTPKWYTEXAS
A
V
E
S
DEACONDRROCK PRAIRIERDPKGREENS PRAIRIE RDVICTORIA AVERAILROAD CROSSING
AT CAPSTONE DRIVE PLANNED
TO BE REMOVED & RELOCATED
TO BARRON ROAD
RAILROAD CROSSING AT
SOUTH DOWLING DRIVE PLANNED
TO BE REMOVED & RELOCATED
TO REALIGNED ROYDER ROAD
EXISTING AT GRADE RAILROAD
CROSSING TO BE REMOVED
EXISTING GRADE
SEPARATED CROSSING
EXISTING AT GRADE RAILROAD
CROSSING
PROPOSED GRADE
SEPARATED CROSSING
PROPOSED RELOCATION OF AT
GRADE RAILROAD CROSSING
* At Grade Railroad Crossing - Level with the street
* Grade Separated Crossing - An overpass or underpass
DATA SOURCE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Page 100 of 108
Air Travel
Easterwood Airport is a non-hub regional airport and is currently owned and operated by the Texas A&M
University System. The 700-acre airport is located on the west side of the University, in northwest College
Station. Its elevation is 320.6 feet and there are two runways in operation. The William A. McKenzie Terminal
provides commuter flights to the cities of Dallas and Houston. Easterwood supplies fuel and flight planning
for Life Flights and Military Medi-vac flights. In 2022, United Airlines discontinued flights out of Easterwood
Airport to George Bush International Airport. Additionally, the extension of FM 249 and its toll facility has
improved travel access to Houston airports.
Page 101 of 108
NEXT STEPS
The Existing Conditions Report serves as the foundation for the 5-year comprehensive plan update process,
providing critical insights into current trends and future needs. The information outlined in this report will
shape the development of the updated Comprehensive Plan and guide its implementation, monitoring, and
evaluation. This iterative approach ensures the plan remains adaptable and responsive to the community’s
evolving needs and priorities. Next steps will focus on collaboration and engagement with key stakeholders,
including residents, local businesses, and city officials, to ensure the updated plan reflects shared goals
and values. The evaluation and appraisal of the plan will be overseen by an appointed Comprehensive Plan
Evaluation Committee, which will provide recommendations to inform the update process.
91
Page 102 of 108
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
PROJECT TEAM
Heather Wade, Principal Planner, Project Manager
Christine Leal, Long Range Planning Administrator
Ashley Klein, Staff Planner
Matt Cline, GIS Analyst
Julie Svetlik, GIS Analyst
Molly Hitchcock, Assistant Director
Jason Schubert, Transportation Planning Administrator
Jesse Dimeolo, Senior Planner
OTHER CONTRIBUTORS
Ramiro Martinez, PE, Engineering Operations Manager, Water Services
Kim Voitier, Utilities Administration Manager, Utilities
Debbie Eller, Director, Community Services
Gustavo Roman, Assistant Director, Community Services
David Brower, Community Development Analyst, Community Services
Joshua Brooks, Community Development Analyst, Community Services
Brian Piscacek, Assistant Director, Economic Development and Tourism
Stacey Vasquez, Economic Development Coordinator
Richard Mann, Fire Chief
Stuart Marrs, Fire Captain
Mary Ellen Leonard, CPA, Director, Fiscal Services
Michael Isermann, Assistant Director, Parks and Recreation
Billy Couch, Police Chief, Police
Caroline Ask, Division Manager - Solid Waste, Public Works
Page 103 of 108
References
Bureau of Labor Statistics (n.d.). OEWS Chart. Www.bls.gov. https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/area_lq_chart/area_lq_chart.htm#
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION APPROVED ANNUAL BUDGET. (n.d.). https://cdnsm5-hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_12410832/File/Departments/Fiscal%20Services/Budget.pdf
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Water and Wastewater Impact Fees Effective August 7, 2023 WATER METER SIZE WATER IMPACT FEES Building Permit Application Date Residential Non-Residential. (n.d.). Retrieved November 8, 2024, from https://cdnsm5-hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_12410832/File/Departments/PDS/ENGR/Water%20and%20Wastewater%20Impact%20Fees.pdf
Forbes, J. (2024, January 30). The 10 Most Bikeable Cities in Texas. Redfin | Real Estate Tips for Home Buying, Selling & More. https://www.redfin.com/blog/most-bikeable-cities-in-texas/
Houston, S. (n.d.). MUNICIPAL ANNEXATION IN TEXAS. https://www.tml.org/DocumentCenter/View/1233/Annexation-Paper-TML-July-2019PDF
LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE CHAPTER 43. MUNICIPAL ANNEXATION. (n.d.). Statutes.capitol.texas.gov. https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/LG/htm/LG.43.htm
Parks and Recreation Department. (2024). Parks and Recreation Map. Arcgis.com. https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/0e8f97be3d544d1ab0045144a9aa968c/#data_s=id%3AdataSource_1-18bb9a71a1a-layer-2%3A5
Pedestrian Safety Campaign. (n.d.). Www.txdot.gov. https://www.txdot.gov/safety/traffic-safety-campaigns/pedestrian-safety.html
Poole, J.M., W.R. Carr, D.M. Price, and J.R. Singhurst. 2007. Rare Plants of Texas. Texas A&M University Press, College Station.
Recognitions/Rankings. (2024). Cstx.gov. https://www.cstx.gov/our_community/recognitions__rankings
Realtor.com, Housing Inventory: Median Listing Price in College Station-Bryan, TX (CBSA) [MEDLISPRI17780], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEDLISPRI17780, September 16, 2024.
Realtor.com, Housing Inventory: Median Listing Price per Square Feet in College Station-Bryan, TX (CBSA) [MEDLISPRIPERSQUFEE17780], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEDLISPRIPERSQUFEE17780, September 16, 2024.
Ricketts, T.H. et al. 1999. Terrestrial Ecoregions of North America: A Conservation Assessment. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
Stebbins, Samual. 2022. College Station, TX Will be Among the Fastest Growing Cities by 2060. https://247wallst.com/city/college-station-tx-will-be-among-the-fastest-growing-cities-by-2060/
SATP - HOME. (2020). Mysocialpinpoint.com. https://burnsmcd.mysocialpinpoint.com/txdot-statewide-active-transportation-plan/home/
Statewide Active Transportation Plan. (2024). Txdot.gov. https://www.txdot.gov/projects/projects-studies/statewide/statewide-active-transportation-plan.html
Texas Comptroller. 2024. “CENTRAL TEXAS REGION 2024 Regional Report.” https://comptroller.texas.gov/economy/economic-data/regions/2024/central.php. The 2024 regional reports utilize sources from JobsEQ, REMI, Texas A&M Real Estate Center, Texas Department of Transportation, U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts.
Texas Demographic Center (2022). Projections of the Total Population of Texas and Counties in Texas, 2020-2060 (0.5 Migration Scenario). Retrieved February 21, 2024, from https://demographics.texas.gov/Resources/TPEPP/Projections/2022/2022statetotsex_mig100.csv
Texas Department of Transportation. 2024. Bryan District Bicycle Plan Story Map.https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/dc4a6d0571e041d784aad9cdc114cfcd
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. “Target Species East Central Texas Plains (Post Oak Savannah) Ecoregion.” https://tpwd.texas.gov/huntwild/wild/wildlife_diversity/texas_nature_trackers/target_species/east_central_plains.phtml#collapseSix. Accessed on June 17, 2024.
Texas Water Development Board. (2022). Texas.gov. https://www.twdb.texas.gov/flood/planning/regions/8/index.asp
U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Selected Characteristics of Health Insurance Coverage in the United States.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S2701, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2023.S2701?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024.
U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Physical Housing Characteristics for Occupied Housing Units.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S2504, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2023.S2504?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024.
93
Page 104 of 108
U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Demographic Characteristics for Occupied Housing Units.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S2502, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2023.S2502?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024.
U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Occupancy Characteristics.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S2501, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2023.S2501?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024.
U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Occupation by Class of Worker for the Civilian Employed Population 16 Years and Over.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S2406, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2023.S2406?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024.
U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Occupation by Sex for the Civilian Employed Population 16 Years and Over.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S2401, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2023.S2401?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024.
U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Disability Characteristics.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S1810, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2023.S1810?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024.
U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Language Spoken at Home.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S1601, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2023.S1601?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024.
U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Educational Attainment.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S1501, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2023.S1501?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024.
U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “School Enrollment.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S1401, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2023.S1401?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024.
U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Marital Status.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S1201, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2023.S1201?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024.
U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Commuting Characteristics by Sex.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S0801, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2023.S0801?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024.
U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Geographic Mobility by Selected Characteristics in the United States.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S0701, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2023.S0701?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024.
U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Age and Sex.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S0101, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST1Y2023.S0101?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024.
U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “ACS Demographic and Housing Estimates.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Data Profiles, Table DP05, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSDP1Y2023.DP05?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024.
U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Selected Housing Characteristics.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Data Profiles, Table DP04, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSDP1Y2023.DP04?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024.
U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Selected Economic Characteristics.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Data Profiles, Table DP03, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSDP1Y2023.DP03?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024.
U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce. “Selected Social Characteristics in the United States.” American Community Survey, ACS 1-Year Estimates Data Profiles, Table DP02, 2023, https://data.census.gov/table/ACSDP1Y2023.DP02?g=160XX00US4815976. Accessed on November 27, 2024.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2024). Explore Census Data. Census.gov. https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST5Y2022.S2504?g=160XX00US4815976
U.S. Climate Data. (2024). https://www.usclimatedata.com/climate/college-station/texas/united-states/ustx2165. Accessed on July 1, 2024.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data (CCD), “Local Education Agency (School District) Universe Survey”, 2016-17 v.2a, 2017-18 v.1a, 2018-19 v.1a, 2019-20 v.1a, 2020-21 v.1a, 2021-22 v.1a, 2022-23 v.1a.
U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency, All-Transactions House Price Index for College Station-Bryan, TX (MSA) [ATNHPIUS17780Q], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ATNHPIUS17780Q, September 16, 2024.
94
Page 105 of 108
cstx.gov/CompPlan
Page 106 of 108
April 3, 2025
Item No. 5.2.
2025 Comprehensive Plan 5-year Evaluation Questionnaire
Sponsor: Christine Leal, Long Range Planning Administrator
Reviewed By CBC: N/A
Agenda Caption: Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding Planning & Zoning
commissioners' feedback to staff for inclusion in the 2025 Comprehensive Plan 5-Year Evaluation &
Appraisal Report.
Relationship to Strategic Goals:
• Good Governance
• Financially Sustainable City
• Core Services and Infrastructure
• Neighborhood Integrity
• Diverse Growing Economy
• Improving Mobility
• Sustainable City
Recommendation(s): Staff recommends commissioners provide verbal or written responses to the
questionnaire regarding the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Summary: The City's Comprehensive Plan directs staff to conduct an evaluation of the plan every
five years, which was last conducted during the 10-year update process in 2020. The Plan
specifically directs staff to elicit feedback from "the Planning and Zoning Commission, and other
appropriate boards and commissions." In alignment with this directive, Planning & Development
Services staff are seeking feedback from the Planning and Zoning Commissioners on the successes
and shortcomings of the current Comprehensive Plan. Staff have prepared a list of six questions to
help facilitate discussion and feedback from the commission; however, any comments regarding the
Comprehensive Plan are appreciated and will be incorporated in the Evaluation & Appraisal Report.
Budget & Financial Summary:
Attachments:
1. Evaluation Questionnaire
Page 107 of 108
1.What should the City of College Station prioritize over the next five
years? Choose the top three:
2.What are some of the successes of the current Comprehensive Plan?
3.Are there any shortcomings of the Comprehensive Plan or specific
obstacles to implementing any part of the Plan? If so, please explain.
4.Are there any trends or major changes in the community that are not
adequately addressed by the current Plan?
5.Are there any parts of the Plan that should be refined or reexamined? If
so, which parts?
6.Please share any additional comments regarding the growth and
development of College Station.
Community image or appearance Drainage and flooding
Environmental protection Historic buildings and areas
Housing needs Jobs and economic development
Neighborhood integrity Parks and recreation facilities
Planning for compatible land uses Public safety services
Redevelopment efforts Traffic circulation
Utilities (water, sewer, electricity)
2025 Comprehensive Plan
5-Year Evaluation Questionnaire
Boards & Commissions
Explore the Comprehensive Plan and take the survey.
Share your thoughts on growth, development, and quality of life.
Page 108 of 108