Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSanitary Sewer Improvements 1970 DAA -74 -70 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION COLLEGE STATION, 't` E xA8 June 29, 1970 MEMORANDUM TO City Council FROM: Mayor SUBJECT: Sewage Disposal Pltnt and 'eater Extension, EDA Grant 1. I attach hereto a copy of a memorandum and attachments as received from Codie Wells on above subject, which are self - explanatory. 2. A seven percent increase is a lot of money and is a reason why, as I indicated earlier, we should proceed soon with our proposed bond issue on this and other matters, for which we are currently getting information. DAA:las Enclosures co: C. 1). Wells (without enclosures ) City Manager titan Boswell CODIE D. WELLS, P.E. C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R 1202 ASHBURN AVE. E COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS PHONE 846.7969 June 20, 1970 Mayor D. A. Anderson. City of College Station College Station, Texas. Dear sir: Our "Summary Engineering Report of Sewerage, Sewage Treatment and Water Main Requirements for the City of College Station, Tex- as" for the year 1969, provides an estimate of construction con- tract cost for the work to be placed under contract in the latter part of 1969. This estimate was the basis for a grant application made to the EDA under date of May 1969, and was made a part of the application under Exhibit #19. It is our understanding that the City has now received appro- val of a grant in aid for this project, and that it is proposed to finance the balance of the cost through a revenue bond issue. Since the project has been delayed and the construction bid date must be moved forward, it follows that the original estimate of contract cost must be increased to reflect the rising cost of construction. Here again I must assume a date for receiving bids, and would recommend that bids be received in December 1970. This will allow two months for voting and sale of the bonds and then four months for completion of plans and specifications and the receipt of bids. 1 might add that December is generally a good month to receive bids, based on past bidding records. Thus the bid date is moved forward one year. The Engineering News Record 2nd. Quarterly Cost summary and forecast, dated June 18, 1970, shown an ENR cost rise on this class of construction of 10% per year. It quotes FWQA, U.S. Dept. of Interior estimate 6% per year. I am using 7% and feel that this is adequate i ve use the 10% project contingency figure as- provided in the EDA Estimated Project Cost, which is on page 4 of the EDA application form. In order that all coats of the project will be clearly shown, I am attaching a copy of the original estimate, which shows the escalation and all calculations. If 1 can be of further service please advise. C . D. ells. PE Consulting Engineer. IV. FINANCIAL DATA NOTEt .lf Basic Grant Is b•Ing ebtalned from another Federal Agency and only • Suppl.montery Grant Is being requested from EDA, Applicant Is NOT r.qulr.d to furnish breakdown of costs es shown In (torn 22. Instead, Insert total polite cost as It.m 224. `' 22. Estimated Project Cost: See Exhibit #22A ' . , A. Preliminary Expense (Compton tshMNf f ?A and Insert fefal hers) •t $ 3,390.00 r B. Land and Rights-of-Way ..: • ♦ • .,s • , s 1 • • $ , 1, 000. 00 s 1 I 1 u•l iv -- C. Construction by Contract . ( V Q F�.$t 4-Pit .7°i. 4 . Q� e . .xg �F.) . • • • • re • • . • • , ;4 ti D. Machinery and Equipment not included in Construction Contract • $ - 0 E. A/E Services provided under an agreement or contracts 33,969.00 „. r� 1 (1) A /E Fees • Vpr.cQ$tnipt •r0Ob a( � , o••.•o •••.o..e 1 41r440.8A (2) Resident Inspection , $ 7, 200. 00 . (j) Test Borings $ 0 (4) Other (sp.o/fy) •■■■•••■■■■••• 1', 0 Attseh sxplanatioe as Exhibit 21E(4) 41,160.00 TOTAL. (item E) ... $, — 30,-4401-40-- F. Legal and Administrative Expense .••. • ••ee•o•ooe•eoe••• ••••.• o . • 900 o• $, 15,000,00 G. Capitalized Interest: (1) During Construction • • • • . o . • .. • • • . • .. • . • . • .,. . _ _ 0 (2) During Development •,,, $ 0 ', TOTAL Minn 0)... . • • • • $ 0 \ 626,550.00 H. TOTAL (Items A • G) .. • : • • •' • • • • s .. . .. $ —686 , 62,655.00 I. Project Contingency (10% of Item H) • • • . • • • $ ` — ., 689,000.00 J. 7070E Estimated Project Cost (Bunt H end I) (revised June 20 ` 1970) .. _ -- 646 -,-OOO 60-- , e '1,0/.r011 :n31110, By: C. D. Wells. •., %;-90-.., , pE - r ` P, `T F - Consulting Engineer° • * ,k' t, ', C. D. WELLS ‘ 93 4a �� `'.`Z� s T s..5.--,..4`;' � .` 4 uscoMM -oe 741ss -r•• • CODIE D. WELLS, P.E. C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R 1202 ASHBURN AVE. E Ca1..EGE,STAT` .h TEXAS a y I1 PHON! 846 -7369 Mayor D. A. Anderson City of College Station College Station, Texas. Re: Sewage Treatment Plant and Sewerage Main and Water Main Expansion. Dear sir: This is supplemental to and supercedes our letter of June 20, 1970 concerning sewage treatment plant expansion and sewer main and water main extensions. I am now advised by the City Manager that the date for consideration of a bond issue has been moved forward to February 1971, which will advance the date of receit of bids on construction to the latter part of 1971. This is two years after the date as originally contem- plated so the estimated cost must be increased to reflect the rising cost of construction. The Engineering News Lecord 4th. quarterly cost surr:lary and forecast of Dec. 17, 1970, shows the Federal Water Quality Administration forecast of increased cost for 1970 of 6% was in error and the actual cost increase was 9 %, and the esti- mated cost increase for 1971 is 9 %. Thus we have a cumulative increase for the two years of 19. I ara therefore attaching a copy of the original estimate of the project cost, escalated for the beginning of construction in the latter part of 1971 which 1 believe is self explan- atory, however if I can be of further service please advise. Respectfully submitted C. D. Wells. PE Consulting Engineer. IV. FINANCIAL DATA r � j , NOTE: If Boslc Gront is being obtained from onother Fedu :ct Agency and only o Supplementary Gront Is being requested from EDA, ,Applicant Is NOT required to furnish breokdown of costs as shown In Item 22. Instead, Insert total project cost os Item 22 -J. 22. Estimated Project Cost: See Exhibit #22A ' . A. Preliminary Expense (Comp!•:• Exhibit 2241 and Insert total hors) $ 3, 390.00 v` B. Land and Rights-of -Way .... a • .. • 1, 000.00 escalation of 19% for two years. = 629,500.00 C. Construction by Contract $ -- 40010O:OG -- i" I D. Machinery and Equipment not included in Construction Contract $ 0 I E. A/E Services provided under an agreement or contract: i - 37,770.00 ` (1) A/E Fees .VPT.CQ$tnict r S7 r -31 744)': (2) Resident Inspection. $ 7, 200.00 ; (3) fast Borings $ 0 (4) Other (speclty) ..$• 0 Attach explanation as Exhibit 22E(4) ,. . , 44,970.00 TOTAL (Item E) $ • -3 O (}; OG- • F. Legal and Administrative Expense O.O. • • • • Q 15, 000. 00 G. Capitalized Interest: (1) During Construction . $ 0 (2) During Development q TOTAL (Item 0)... • • • • • $ 0 I • 693,860.00 11. T, .. (Items A • G) .. .. ..... ... $ , -- •86,-00 -44 -- 69,386.00 I. Project Contingency (10% of Item H) • • • • • • 3 58,-040•`414- - 763,000.00 j. TOTAL Estimated Project Cost (Sum 113 md 1) .(.x2IT7 -+s.Q,G .Jr «..2.,..19.7•1.1 • $ _ — 6 4 a - - . . r, /' � -- eL rte `` J /. CC ,, C . a By C. D. Wells. PE 2.-.,\-.. %),' ' - ' ,. _ . . Consulting Engineer. ' <? , •lea L:al. 1 •fit - f. ' • • . UDC.7MM-DC 74t:.. „4 „., y f • ,., .-. : srr . .m :.s ; _•i 1 'r' _.n 1. G f '`f - .. t,,. f l 44 ..sa75 '7"75~ ;a, v, / 97/ L 5. i Jt /i 7 nefAi<oC wri- . - -. - - , 1 I f �� � J61, wt',2 e... `� .5� wNr � �a f er 1 ; % o�: I � r — , ll 1 ` !V iL ,, ; ;?cr�� =x /;,V1 1 004 / 1 13`ie / 00 3 ✓Y II: I ;I ,,, I I I • li - 11 /,ik/, Rc'Wi ; i 1 9cc ; � ;1"6 I I 1 I jl G :l5 6 c,l / - re 7 C t _5 &C 1 6.1- � 5 e.' ,' ' t n 2 4 , ' �P2� el,. '' I _ 1 6 II II ; i , �,y ri.-e c.? �> z!� 1.2: V ,..3F.5!) 1 12 r/.� ` I 3 77yj 1 / I j G Ii • !'L.eyy/ z /) >,, /_"x / 8 bor `'° c � � �a I ' 1 I I' • • 11 .1 I I i F _ 1 z. II �7.'cl 9 2C2o, 72.23.x; k2/6‘.5: is i. 6e I i , , I aI I ,r� + , 7! 1 _ I I, I -- �J f .L'i //J _!1 '/ef - /C .•:' /' I_ - ' l lc.� r ,-? 3' I 1 I y 8C, , - .. Ij /c ,/ 0 - f - /,: , I 17`71') e 52 C6 ' / 1 246 : . I i 1 1 i _ _i _ • I , II C- sGG ` ` j i t I { � I . 1 i J 1 I I I� 11 I - I. II { { i I t j {1 , I I S f II I ` l I . I , I ' , I H n IV. FINANCIAL DATA / --- ` , �1 NOTE: If Basic Groot Is b.ing ebteln.d from onothst Federal Agency and only • Supplint...tory Otani Is b•Ing requested from EDA, Applicant Is NOT ',milted to furnish breakdown of costs •s shown In Item 22. Instead, Inset, total point :l cost as Item 224. . 22. Estimated Project Cost* '1 See Exhibit #22A ' . • 3 390. A. Preliminary Expense (Cewplet• IttAlalt IRA and Insert total A•r•) ••• • • s • s $, r B. Land and Rights-of-Way .. • • • , _ 1, 000. 00 escalation of 19% for two years• = 629,500.00 . ' C. Construction by Contract ar r• ••. •`i• . 1 , -- 628 -- ' D. Machinery and Equipment not included in Construction Centraet ...e.1 4 , 0 • E. A/E Services provided under an agreement et contracts 37,770.00 ; (1) A/E Fees .1 P% rr--si me- (2) Resident Inspection t $ 7, 200.00 • ()) Test Borings $ 0 , (4) Other (Specify) . .11. 0 • Attach explanation as Exhibit 22E(4) . ' • t • , t 44 ,97 0 . 00 TOTAL (item E).....••••• ........• 4 • – 89i0OOTOG ,• F. Legal and Administrative Expe•n • • •:•• • . • II • 15, 000, 00 G. Capitalized Interest* • (1) During Construction • 8 0 (2) During Development . $ 0 TOTAL (item 0)... . • . • • $ 0 • 693,860.00 H. TOTAL (Items A • 0) .. ..... • . • . $ --5 r- OOOrO8 -- 69,386.00 I. Project Contingency ( lOiGof Item H) ....•.o. .....•...•.••. •••• s •:••.•r • ' 48 r -00444— 763 000 00 at N j. TOTAL Estimated Project Coot (Se and 1) .(�eiaSe.cc .J 8.ri 14.187x.) ... $ _ 46, g ba: By: C; ; D . Wells. PE %,. \ ( I) • Consulting Engine 'r.. � _ *' . s, GV ;x': l C. D. WELLS , � ` e, e? 1 /0tiAL E� ' 41 111m to- r 4 VaCOMM•OC 741111114 • F • • • GUIDELINES FOR SECTION 8 GRANTS TO PROJECTS TREATING INDUSTRIAL WASTE • j 1. No grant shall be given to a project or portion thereof treating 100 percent industrial wastes unless: (A) That project is otherwise eligible for federal financial. • assistance under. the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 PL 89 -136 or any'other federal law designed • to stimulate economic development or to ease the impact of • federal action. or • (B) In exceptional cases, where the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of FWQA that the public benefits of the project greatly outweigh any benefits to industry. All such cases must be forwarded, together with pertinent details and appropriate recommendations, to Headquarters for review. A project may be considered to treat "100 percent industrial Wastes even if it treats the domestic wastes generated within the industrial facility or from a small number of nearby houses. 2. In all cases where 30 percent or more of the total volume or strength of the waste load to be treated by a project is generated by a single industrial facility, operation or concern, the applicant 'shall give assurance of the likelihood of the continued operation • and waste loadings from such facility, operation or concern during the expected life of the treatment facility. Substantial prepayment of service fees or other financial commitment by the industry • concerned will be considered as part of such assurance. 3. Where pretreatment of industrial waste is necessary to preclude damage to a treatment - facility or its operation, . such pretreatment shall be .provided. Projects or portions thereof intended for the pretreatment of industrial wastes are not eligible for grant support. 4. No grant shall be given for a project treating industrial wastes if the applicant does not have, or will not have in effect at the time of operation, an ecui_table system of cost recovery, pursuant to 18 CFR 601.34 (C). The regulation requires that industrial users of a system repay the applicant for the costs • incurred by the applicant in treating the industrial waste. The appointment of the costs to industrial users must bear a relationship to the individual industrial user's contribution to the•waste load. - It is the responsiblity of the applicant to demonstrate to FWQA that his system is indeed equitable. FWQA will approve any system that appears to be reasonable and that satisfies the intent of the . regulation. - • • o • 5. If a project which would otherwise be eligible for grant support serves a "Fugitive Industry" (I.E., an industry which is - relocating for the purpose of avoiding compliance with ' established Water Quality Standards or conformance with other State and Federal Water Quality requirements), the project costs • • attributable to treating that Industry's wastes are ineligible for grant support. 6. There may be cases where, notwithstanding the eligibility of a project for support under federal rules and regulations, the propriety of federal assistance is questionable. The public • benefits to be derived by the construction, the relation of the ultimate cost of constructing and:maintaining the works to the public interest or public necessity for the works, or the provisions for proper and efficient operation and maintenance may be such as to not warrant federal financial assistance in the project. In such instances, the case is to be forwarded together with the pertinent details and appropriate recommenda- tions, to Headquarters for review. • • • • • • • • • • • • i { A i t • 1 1 '1OL'S and Pumping Stations There has been considerable confusion in the past as to the . definition of an interceptor, within the context of the Federal . Water Pollution Control. Act. Vhile many cases. are..c.lear and can • be readily decided, th&re are other cases where it is difficult • • to decide as to whether the sewer classifies as an interceptor or. collector. The purpose of this memorandum is to provide soma general guidelines to assist the Regions in making determinations for those cases which may not be clear. ' • • The distinction between an interceptor sewer and an • • ineligible sewer depends upon the primary function of the line. An interceptor may be defined as a sewer wh)se primary purpose is • ..to transport rather than to collect wastes. Thus, sewers that • primarily collect waste from homes and other structures, street laterals, and trunk sewers are not considered t.o'be interceptor sewers. Nor is a sewer line considered. to be an eligible • interceptor merely because it parallels a watercourse or waterbody. • A sewer. line can he considered eligible for a grant under Section 8 of the Act if It performs one or more of the following functions • as its primary purpose; • • a. 'It intercepts wastes from a final point in a collection system . and conveys such wastes directly to a treatmeot facility. • / • • • b. It serves in place of a.treatment facility and transports the • • collected wastes to an adjoining collection system or interceptor • sewer for treatment. • c. It transports the wastes from one or•more municipal collection systems to another municipality or to a regional plant for treatment. d . It intercepts an existing major discharge of raw or inadequately • treated waste water for transport directly to another interceptor • or to a treatment plant. • /A sewer with a minor number of building or lateral connections . • may be considered an interceptor sewer if it performs one or more . of the functions listed above. Eligibility of stations will • be determined on the basis of the sewers which they serve, in accordance • with these guidelines. Where doubt exists as to the application of these guidelines in specific instances, such cases should he referred to Headquarters for decision. • • September 15, 1971 Mr. Don Dillon City Attorney Pest Office Box 3520 Bryan, Texas 77801 Dear Mr. Dillon: Enclosed is a copy of a letter from Mr. Hugh M. Farmer of the U. S. Department of Commerce pertaining to the contract with the City of Bryan for electrical power, water and sanitary sewer services. After you have had time to study this communi- cation, please call so that we may have an opportunity to discuss what we should do. Sincerely, R:in Boswell City Manager RB /nr Enclosure • THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATI Ei U 1 1 0 1 TEXAS AVENUE • 77840 ► 1 TEXAS • 1 •3 e • • September 15, 1971 Mr. Fred Sandlin 401 Helena �0 Bryan, Texas 77801 Dear Mr. Sandlin: Enclosed is a copy of a letter from Mr. Hugh M. Farmer of the U. S. Department of Commerce pertaining to the contract with the City of Bryan for electrical power, water and sanitary sewer services. After you have had time to study this communi- cation, please call so that we may have an opportunity to discuss what we should do. Sincerely, V Ran Boswell City Manager RB /nr Enclosure ya.Ol o,v yp O j U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 7�e �pyf ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION ■t� pig SOUTHWESTERN REGIONAL OFFICE 702 COLORADO STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 September 13, 1971 PMr. Ran Bozwell City Manager City of College Station 101 Church Street, N. College Station, Texas 77840 L Re: 08 -1 -00959 City of College Station Dear Mr. Boswell: In reference to your September 3, 1971 letter and enclosures, we have reviewed the documents relevant to your compliance with Special Condition A of the Offer of Grant. From the documents presently in our possession, it appears that Special Condition A has not been satisfied. The Agreement be- tween the cities of Bryan and College Station for electric, water, and sewer services is dated November 29, 1965 and is for a term of five years. It therefore expired on November 29, 1970. Thus, the Amendment dated January 25, 1971 could apparently have no effect on the expired Agreement and the change in billing dates by the Amendment would be void. Further, the Amendment changes the term of the Agreement from five years to three years. Therefore, on the basis of the documents presently in our posses- sion, Special Condition A has not been satisfied, unless the November 29, 1965 Agreement was amended prior to the November 29, 1970 amendment. Please explain or prepare and execute another contract which will cover at least another five year period. As to Special Condition B, the documentation clearly demonstrates that it has been complied with. Sincerely, /j/C ugh M. Farmer, P.E. Chief, Technical Support Division cc: Riewe & Wischmeyer, Inc. 1Ziewe & C LOiocitsttever, CONSULTING ENGINEERS 8533 FERNDALE ROAD • DALLAS ,TEXAS 75238 • 214/348 - 3255 E. M. RIEWE September 24, 1971 W.J. WISCHMEYER Mr. John Marino, P.E. Project Manager Economic Developement Administration 702 Colorado St. Austin, Texas 78701 Re: 08 -1 -00959 City of College Station, Texas Dear Mr. Marino: Attached please find a copy of our engineering contract with the City of College Station. The contract scope includes the following service: (1) Provides for plans and specifications per section (4) and provides for other contract documents under section (1)B (2) Attends bid openings and prepare and submit bid tabulations per section (1)B (3) Review bidders qualifications and make recommendations concerning award per section (1)1 (4) Provide surveillance of project construction to assure compliance section (1)C and (2) (5) Prepare change orders included in final estimate per section (1)C (6) The engineer hereby agrees to submit a monthly report covering general progress of the project. (7) Review and approve monthly estimates per section (1)C (8) The ingineer hereby agrees to certify partial payments to contractor (9) The engineer agrees to a 10% retainage to be withheld from all partial payments on construction contracts. (10) Prepare "as built" drawings per section (1)C (11) Review and approval of shop drawings per section (1)C (12) The Engineer hereby agrees to comply with all applicable provisions of the Regulations of the U.S. Dept. of Commerce (Part 8 of Subtitle 15 of the Code of Federal Regulations) issued pursuant to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, in regard to non discrimination in employment, because of race, creed, color, or national origin. You may attach this to our contract to become a part of our contract. Very truly yours, W. J Wischmeyer, P.E. WJW /dkw cc: Mr. Ran Boswell, City Manager City Hall College Station, Texas �" U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE • °s ,7 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION �e _ ~ SOUTHWESTERN REGIONAL OFFICE jr +ns Of ' 702 COLORADO STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 October 7, 1971 M r. Ran Bozwell City Manager City of College Station 101 Church Street, N. L College Station, Texas 77840 RE: EDA Project No. 08 -1 -00959 City of College Station, Texas Dear Mr. Bozwell: Your Engineering Agreement with Riewe & Wischmeyer, Inc., Dallas, Texas, for engineering services on the above project is approved. This agreement is approved subject to the engineering basic fee of 8% remaining within the approved line item for Engineering Services (total amount of $42,300.00). If you have any questions on the above item, or if you require additional information pertinent thereto, please contact Mr. John Marino, Project Engineer, telephone no. 512/475 -5826. Sincerely, H gh M. Farmer, P.E. Chief, Technical Support Division cc: Riewe & Wischmeyer, Inc. 0 /0T OP y0 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE f - o ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION Nits ; SOUTHWESTERN REGIONAL OFFICE 702 COLORADO STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 October 13, 1971 n Mr. Ran Bozwell City Manager City of College Station 101 Church Street, N. F ollege Station, Texas 77840 Re: EDA Project No. 08 -1 -00959 City of College Station, Texas Dear Mr. Bozwell: The following items remain to be submitted for approval prior to advertisement for bids, as required by our "Requirements for Approved Projects" and as discussed with Mr. John Marino, Project Engineer, during his September 1, 1971, visit to your office: 1. A copy of your Attorney Agreement. 2. Construction Finance Plan, including Interim Financing, with a Cash Flow Diagram. 3. Proof of Honesty Bond, in the amount of $50,000. 4. Special Conditions to the Grant Agreement. 5. Form ED -1004, "Depository Bank Acceptance and Confirma- tion Statement." 6. CM -FF -1, "Certificates as to Project Site, Rights -of- Way and Easements." 7. EPA and State Health Department approvals. 8. Project Schedule. 9. Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimate. 10. Form ED -151 (Engineer Certification). Shall accompany Item No. 9. At least 45 days prior to Advertisement for Bids you should make a letter request to this office for Federal Wate Rates. This request should be accompanied by a copy of the current State Wage Decision and the latest Federal Wage Decision, if available. If you have any questions on the above matter, or if you require additional information pertinent thereto, please contact Mr. John Marino, Project Engineer, Telephone No. AC 512/475 -5826. Sincerely, ( 2— LAM,S1_,— H h M. Farmer, P.E. Chief, Technical Support Division cc: Riewe & Wischmeyer, Inc. • , Or C� p` s�e r U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION �p SOUTHWESTERN REGIONAL OFFICE 4 t47ti Of 702 COLORADO STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 October 15, 1971 Mr. Ran Bozwell City Manager 101 Church Street, N. College Station, Texas 77840 L Re: EDA Project No. 08 -1 -00959 City of College Station, Texas Dear Mr. Bozwell: • The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policy Act of 1970 ( "Act ") was enacted and became effective January 2, 1971. The Act provides for specified payments and other assistance to individuals, businesses, and farm opera- tions which are displaced as the result of the acquisition of Real Property for Federal and Federally- assisted projects and prescribes certain uniform real property acquisition policies for such projects. Additional information and a copy of the Act are attached. In order.to determine if and in what manner referenced project is affected by the Act, it is 'requested that you and your attorney complete the attached Relocation Assistance Certificate ( "Certificate "). In addition to the opinion specified in the Certificate, it is requested that your attorney provide an opinion, including appropriate citations to applicable law, if there are any sections or portions of such sections of. the Act with which you can comply at this time (but could not as of January 2, 1971) as a result of state or local enabling legis- lation enacted subsequent to January 2, 1971. This opinion should include the effective date of the enabling legislation. The Relocation Assistance Certificate is to be completed in • triplicate, with distribution as follows: One copy, with attorney's opinion attached, to: Hugh M. Farmer, P.E. Chief, Technical Support Division Economic Development Administration 702 Colorado Street Austin, Texas 78701 • 2 • One copy, without the attorney's opinion, to: George T. Karras Director, Office of Public Works EDA, U. S. Department of Commerce Room 7884 Main Commerce Building Washington, D. C. 202.30 One copy for your file. It is requested that the Certificate be remitted to the above addresses within thirty days after receipt of this letter. If you have any questions on the above matter, or if you require additional information pertinent thereto, please • contact Mr. John F. Marino , Project Engineer, telephone number AC 512/475 -5826. Sincerely; 1 h M. Farmer, P.E. Chief, Technical Support Division 4 Enclosures: Relocation Assistance Certificate (3 copies) Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 . Notice to Recipients of EDA Assistance -- Compliance with PL 91 -646 Memorandum to Recipients of EDA Assistance -- Implementation of PL 91 -646 • 4r• 11 Or co.4. #ts U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE l y ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION �r�Tas SOUTHWESTERN REGIONAL OFFICE M 702 COLORADO STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 January 13, 1972 1 Riewe & Wischmeyer, Inc. 8533 Ferndale Road Dallas, TeXas 75238 L • Re: EDA Project No. 08 -1 -00959 City of College Station, Texas Gentlemen: In keeping with Section I, paragraph 9 of the booklet Requirements for Approved Projects, you are requested to submit the information called for in the attached ,guideline in order to obtain a "Certificate of Adequacy of Treatment" for the above project. Sincerely, u gh M. Farmer, P.E. Chief, Technical Support Division Enclosure cc: Mr. Ran Bozwell, City Manager, College Station Honorable J. B. Hervey . Mayor, City of College Station Kiewe Oc q/i6eitmeyer, ' E14. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 8527 FERNDALE ROAD DALLAS.TEXAS 75238 • 214 /348 - 3255 E. M. RIEWE W. J. WISCHMEYER 14 January 1972 U.S. Department of Commerce, E D A Regional Office, 702 Colorado Street, Austin, Texas 78701 Res College Station, Texas L D A Project No. 08-1 -00959 Gentlemen: Regarding your letter dated 13 January, '72 please be advised that we plan to submit engineering information for Certificate of Adequacy of treatment at the time we submit the plans and specifications. At that time we will submit sale to all State and Federal Agencies. Very truly yours, i jk\j"k" J. wischneyer, F.E. VJw /cj CCs Mr. Ran Boswell, City Mgr. City Hall, College Station, Texas Zie113e (idcIwteyer, ✓ HC• CONSULTING ENGINEERS 8527 FERNDALE ROAD • DALLAS,TEXAS 75238 • 214 348-3255 E. M. RIEWE j5 January, 1472 W WISCHMEYER Mr. John Marino, P.E. Project Manager Economic Development Adr;inistration 702 Colorado Street, Austin, Texas Re: 08 -1 -00959 City of College Station, Texas Dear Mr. Marino: We hereby request your obtaining for us a heavy construction Wage Rate Determination from the U S Dept. of Labor for subject project. Attached please find a copy of a recent determination beinz used in the area, about 8 riles distant from this project. In addition to these skills the following are required: Bricklayers Electricians Painters Roofers Very truly yours, AV S13 W. J. Wischmeyer, P. E. WJw /c j CC: Ran Boswell, City Mgr. P.G. Pox 9960 College Station, Texas 77840 • 'iewe Ot aoctimeyer, ✓ HC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 8533 FERNDALE ROAD • DALLAS,TEXAS 75238 • 214/348 - February 7, 1972 E. M. RIEWE W. J. WISCHMEYER Texas State Department of Health Plans & Specifications Division of Wastewater Technology Austin, Texas Attn: Mr. David Cochran, P.E. Mr, Chandler J. McCoy, P.E. Re: College Station, Texas Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements Gentlemen: We are this date mailing to you under separate cover one (1) set of plans and specifications for subject project. This work is being funded in part by the U. S. Department of Commerce, Economic Developement Administration thru a grant. s an Please review this project at your earliest convenience.SDt requiresgaf�e approval letter from your office. Should you have any q lle further informr:tion please advise. Very truly,yours, W. J. Wischmeyer, P.B. WJW /dkw Encl. Design Data cc: Mr. John Marino Ran Boswell, City Manager 'iewe & c iZiochmeyer, ✓ItC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 8533 FERNDALE ROAD • DALLAS,TEXAS 75238 • 214/348 -3255 E. M. RIEWE February 7, 1972 W. WISCHMEYER Mr. John Marino, P.E. , Project Manager Economic Developement Administration 702 Colorado Street Austin, Texas 78701 Re: 08 -1 -00959 City of College Station Dear Mr. Marino: We are this date mailing to you under separate cover one (1) set of plans and specifications for subject project. We will submit shortly the remaining items as required by your "Requirements for Approved Projects." Very truly yours, W. J. Wi chmeyer, P . WJW /dkw cc: Mr. Ran Boswell, City Manager P 0 Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77840 IZiewe & Oj1CItmeyer, � HC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 8527 FERNDALE ROAD • DALLAS .TEXAS 75238 • 214/348 E. M. R I E W E 8 February, 1972 W. J. WISCHMEYER Mr John Marino, P.E., Project Mgr. Economic Development Administration, . 702 Colorado Street, Austin, Texas 78701 Re: EDA Project No. 08-1 -00959 Dear Mr. Marino: The City of College Station is applying this week for a 55% Federal grant and 25% State aid for the construction of Sanitary Sewers. The scope of this grant request is outlined in the attached Engineering Information Form CG -123, the Cost Estimate, and the Plan Attachment No. 1. This program will immediately follow the current grant program with EDA for the construction of a 1.5 MGD Addition to the Waste Treatment facility and Water Line Extensions. ' ) Very truly ours, iti W. J. Wis hmeyer, P.E. WJW /cj ENC: Engineering Information Form CG Cost Estimate & Attachment No. 1 levee widcllwne yer,'rtC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 8527 FERNDALE ROAD • DALLAS,TEXAS 75238 • 214/348-3255 8 February, 1972 E. M. RIEWE W. J. WISCHMEYER Mr. John Marino, P.E. Project Engineer Economic Development Administration, 702 Colorado Street, Austin, Texas 78701 Re: EDA Project No. 08 -1 -00959 Dear Mr. Marino: During 1966 an extensive study was performed relative to the effect of local soils conditions and water on the then existing water distribution system. Existing asbestos- cement pipe had undergone severe leeching and softening of the interior of the pipe due to the very soft well water carried by the system. Beam breaks had occurred due to the extreme swelling and shrinkage nature of the local soils. Experience indicated that piping materials utilizing portland cement as the principal agent for imparting structural strength to the pipe suffer serious degrada- tion in a relatively short period. To effectively resist internal and external corrosion and offer high resistance to severe bending stresses, it was recommended that cast iron or ductile iron pipe encased in 8 mil thick polyethylene, be used. For all the reasons stated above we, as consultants for the City have recommended and have limited the water line materials on this project to those in the proposal, namely cast iron and ductile iron pipe. Very truly yours, a __ W. J. Wi chmeyer, P.E. WJW /cj CC: Mr. Ran Boswell, City Mgr. P.O. Box 9960, College Station, Texas 77840 I • . LCWe & 'Wi1Cllme yer, D14C. CONSULTING ENGINEERS • 8533 FERNDALE ROAD • DALLAS,TEXAS 75238 • 214/348-3255 E. M. RIEWE 8 February, 1972 W.J. WISCHMEYER • Mr. Ran Boswell, City Manager P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77840 Re: Financial Assistance for Sewerage Improvements Texas Water Quality Board, and Texas Water Development Board Dear Mr. Boswell: In order that the City may qualify for a 55% grant the State aid portion of 25% should be applied for. Attached you will find a copy of the Joint Rules and Regulations in this regard. We further bring to your attention, Section 205.2 Component QuuLd .I.vu "S" as shown on page 10. This material is financial in character and will necessarily have to be answered by your financial advisor or bond attorney and should be submitted in triplicate on your own form. This should accompany your application packet which we are submitting to you today. Very truly yours, W. J Wischmeyer, WJW/cj ENC: Joint Rules & Regulations JOINT RULES, REGULATIONS, AND POLICIES OF THE TEXAS WATER QUALITY BOARD AND TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD RELATING TO FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TREATMENT WORKS c r� • TABLE OF CONTENTS RULES, REGULATIONS, AND POLICIES CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Page 100. DEFINITIONS 1 100.1 Definition of Terms 1 105. GENERAL PROCEDURES 4 105.1 Mailing and Submission Requirements 4 105.2 Number of Copies Required 5 105.3 Communications 5 105.4 Fees 5 105.5 Approval and Amendment of Rules 5 110. POLICY 5 110.1 State Policy 5 110.2 Administrative Policies 5 (a) Bonds Eligible for Purchase 5 (b) Income Pledges for Revenue Bonds 6 (c) Requirements as to Maturities 6 (d) Considerations in Passing on Application 6 (e) Inspection Procedures During Actual Construction 7 (f) Testing of Materials 8 ii r . . - TABLE OF CONTENTS - (Cont'd.) Page (g) Approval of Plans and Specifications 8 (h) Construction Contracts 8 CHAPTER II FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PURCHASE OF BONDS OR OTHER OBLIGATIONS INTRODUCTION 9 PROCEDURE TO INITIATE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE 200. APPLICANT 9 200.1 Functions of Applicant 9 205. APPLICATION FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE BY SALE OF BONDS AND FEDERAL GRANT 10 • 205.1 Application Information 10 205.2 Required General Information (Component "5") 10 205.3 Required Federal Grant Data and Technical Information (Component "F ") 15 210. FORMAL ACTION BY THE QUALITY BOARD 15 210.1 Quality Board Consideration of Application 15 210.2 Action of the Quality Board on Application 16 210.3 Staff Certification of Project 16 210.4 Engineering Data Prerequisite to Staff Certification 17 iii • • TABLE OF CONTENTS - (Cont'd.) Page 210.5 Legal Documents Prerequisite to Staff Certification 18 215. CLOSING PROCEDURE 19 215.1 Instruments Required for Closing 19 220. ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PHASE FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROJECTS 20 220.1 General Information 20 220.2 Awarding Contracts for Actual Construction 21 220.3 Supervision of Actual Construction 21 220.4 Alterations in Approved Plans and Specifications 21 220.5 Actual Construction Cost Overruns 22 CHAPTER III FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE DIRECT LOANS AND OBLIGATIONS OTHER THAN BONDS 300. POLICY 23 300.1 State Policy �3 305. FORMAL ACTION BY THE QUALITY BOARD 23 305.1 Quality Board Consideration of Application 23 305.2 Loan Agreement 24 305.3 Application Information 24 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS - (Cont'd.) CHAPTER IV FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE STATE OF TEXAS WATER POLLUTION CONTROL COMPACT BONDS Page INTRODUCTION 25 APPENDIX OF FORMS A -1 v JOINT RULES, REGULATIONS, AND POLICIES OF THE TEXAS WATER QUALITY BOARD AND TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD RELATING TO FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TREATMENT WORKS CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION These Rules are adopted jointly by the Texas Water Quality Board and the Texas Water Development Board, as authorized by Subchapter G of the Texas Water Quality Act (Chapter 21, Subchapter I, Texas Water Code), for the purpose of making Water Quality Enhancement Funds authorized by Arti- cle III, Section 49 -d -1, Texas Constitution, available to political sub- divisions of the State for use as State matching funds for obtaining maxi- mum Federal grants for the construction of treatment works. 100. DEFINITIONS 100.1 DEFINITION OF TERMS The following definitions of terms apply where used in these Rules or in proceedings relating to the subject of these Rules unless otherwise specifically indicated: (a) "Quality Board" means the Texas Water Quality Board. (b) "Development Board" means the Texas Water Development Board. (c) "EPA" means the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or its successor. (d) "Actual construction" means that outlined in Rule 100.1(i)4. (e) "Applicant" means the political subdivision applying for State financial assistance for construction of treatment works pursuant to the statutory provision. (f) "Certificate of final project completion" means a certificate issued by the Executive Director of the Quality Board, that the construction of treatment works pursuant to contract financed in whole or in part by water quality enhancement funds has been completed in compliance with these rules. (g) "Change order" means the documents issued by the contractor, applicant or project engineer, authorizing a change, alteration, or variance in previously approved engineering plans and speci- fications, including but not limited to additions or deletions of work to be performed pursuant to the contract or a change in costs for work performed pursuant to contract. (h) "Closing" or "date of closing" means the time of actual transfer of funds from the Water Quality Enhancement Account to an appli- cant for purpose of constructing treatment works. (i) "Compact" means State of Texas Water Polution Control Compact. (j) "Construction" means: (1) preliminary planning to determine the economic and engineering feasibility of the project; (2) engineering, architectural, legal, fiscal and economic investigations and studies; (3) surveys, designs, plans, working drawings, specifications, procedures and other actions necessary to the construction of the project; (4) erection, building, acquisition, alteration, remodeling, improvement and extension; and (5) inspection and supervision. (k) "Contractor" means the prime or general contractor who contracts with the applicant for construction of treatment works. (1) "Development Fund Manager" means the fiscal administrator of the Texas Water Development Fund. (m) "Estimated project costs" means the eligible project costs as defined by EPA. (n) "Financial assistance" means any loan of water quality enhancement funds made to a political subdivision for the construction of treatment works through the purchase of bonds or other obligations of the political subdivision or pursuant to a loan agreement. 2 (o) "Loan" means purchase by the State of the bonds or other obligations of a political subdivision with water quality enhancement funds or entry by the State into a loan agree- ment with any political subdivision for a direct loan of water quality enhancement funds. (p) "Order of Conditional Approval" means the action of the Quality Board conditionally approving an application for financial assistance and directing the Development Board to deliver water quality enhancement funds pursuant to the statutory provision. (q) "Political subdivision" means the State, a county, city, or other body politic or corporate of the State, including any district or authority created under Article III, Section 52, or Article XVI, Section 59, Texas Constitution, and including any interstate compact commission to which the State is a party. (r) "Project engineer" means the engineer or engineering firm re- tained by the applicant to prepare engineering data and analyses required for the treatment works and to supervise actual con- struction of the treatment works. (s) "Rules" means these Joint Rules, Regulations, and Policies of the Quality Board and Development Board as approved by the Attorney General of Texas and filed with the Secretary of State in accordance with law. (t) "State Priority Rating" means the Quality Board numerical rating system which establishes the relative priority between treatment works and is used in allocating State and Federal financial assistance between applicants. (u) "Statutory provision" means Subchapter G of the Texas Water Quality Act (Chapter 21, Subchapter I, Texas Water Code). (v) "Treatment works" means the various devices used in the treatment of waste, including necessary intercepting sewers, outfall sewers, pumping, power and other equipment and their appurtenances and any extension, improvements, remodeling and alteration of and additions to these devices. (w) "Water quality enhancement" means the construction of treatment works by political subdivisions with loans provided pursuant to the statutory provision. (x) "Water quality enhancement funds" means the proceeds from the sale of Texas Water Development Bonds issued under the authority 3 of Article III, Section 49 -d -1, Texas Constitution, and the statutory provision. (y) "Water Quality Enhancement Account" means the separate account created in the Texas Water Development Fund by the Rules and the statutory provision. The proceeds derived from the sale of Texas Water Development Bonds issued pursuant to Article III, Section 49 -d -1, Texas Constitution, for the purpose of making loans to political subdivisions for use as State - matching funds to obtain maximum Federal grants in construction of treatment works shall be deposited into this account. (z) "Water Quality Enhancement Clearance Account" means that sep arate account created by the Development Board in the Texas Water Development Clearance Fund. All monies received by the Development Board under the Water Quality Enhancement Program shall be deposited in this account, except proceeds from the sale of Texas Water Development Bonds and from the resale of bonds purchased from political subdivisions. Monies in this account may be transferred to the Water Quality Enhancement Interest and Sinking Account at any time. (aa) "Water Quality Enhancement Interest and Sinking Account" means the separate account created by the Development Board in the Texas Water Development Interest and Sinking Fund. Sufficient funds to pay all interest and principal becoming due during the ensuing fiscal year on Texas Water Development Bonds issued under Article III, Section 49 -d -1, Texas Constitution, shall be accumu- lated in this account. (bb) "Water Quality Enhancement Reserve" means that reserve in the Water Quality Enhancement Interest and Sinking Account equal to the average annual principal and interest requirements on all outstanding bonds issued under Article III, Section 49 -d -1, Texas Constitution. 105. GENERAL PROCEDURES 105.1 MAILING AND SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS All formal instruments required to be filed by these Rules may be delivered personally by the applicant's representative, or by United States Mail, to the Texas Water Quality Board, Capitol Station, Austin, Texas, 78711. 4 105.2 NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED Four (4) copies of all applications for financial assistance are required. The Quality Board will transmit two (2) copies to EPA and one (1) copy to the Development Fund Manager. 105.3 COMMUNICATIONS Official communications shall be directed to the Texas Water Quality Board. The Quality Board shall be the State agency to communicate with EPA. 105.4 FEES No filing fees are required for filing any application for financial assistance or other instrument with the Quality Board or the Development Board. 105.5 APPROVAL AND AMENDMENT OF RULES These Rules have been approved by the Attorney General of Texas and shall not be amended without approval of the Quality Board, the Development Board, and the Attorney General of Texas. Having been approved, the Rules shall be filed with the Secretary of State in accordance with Article 6252-13, Vernon's Civil Statutes. 110. POLICY 110.1 STATE POLICY It is the policy of the State of Texas to maintain the quality of water in the State consistent with the public health and enjoyment, the propagation and protection of terrestrial and aquatic life, the operation of existing industries, and the economic development of the State; to encourage and pro- mote the development and use of regional and area -wide waste collection, treatment, and disposal systems to serve the waste disposal needs of the citizens of the State; to provide financial assistance to cities and other public agencies for water quality enhancement purposes; and to require the use of all reasonable methods to implement this policy. 110.2 ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES (a) BONDS ELIGIBLE FOR PURCHASE - Securities eligible for purchase may be in one or more of the following categories: 5 • (1) General obligation bonds, limited tax (2) General obligation bonds, unlimited tax (3) Revenue bonds, prior lien (4) Combination tax and revenue The Quality Board may consider the applicant's issuance of junior lien revenue bonds or other obligations when the delivery of prior lien revenue bonds to the Development Board is precluded by conditions contained in for - mer bond resolutions or ordinances adopted by the governing body of the applicants, or by other causes. (b) INCOME PLEDGES FOR REVENUE BONDS - Bonds which are payable in whole or in part from revenues shall include an appropriate pledge of revenues. (c) REQUIREMENTS AS TO MATURITIES - Bonds shall have a final maturity not exceeding forty (40) years from their date. Serial maturities shall be arranged to create a schedule of debt service require- ments which is reasonably uniform over the life of the issue where circumstances permit such arrangement. However, where warranted, principal maturities may be arranged to accomodate reasonably expected future growth in payment ability; or, under appropriate conditions, term bonds may be acceptable. Bonds may made callable at the option of the issuer on any interest payment date on and after ten (10) years from the date of the bonds at par plus accrued interest. Junior lien revenue bonds may be made callable at any time, at par plus accrued interest. Principal of all bonds shall mature January 10 and /or July 10 and interest payment dates shall be January 10 and July 10, except when pro- hibited by prior bond resolutions or ordinances. (d) CONSIDERATIONS IN PASSING ON APPLICATION - In passing on an application from a political subdivision for financial assist- ance, the Quality Board shall consider: (1) The public benefit to be derived from the treatment works and the propriety of State participation; (2) The availability of revenue to the political subdivision, from all sources, for the ultimate repayment of the cost of the treatment works, including interest; and (3) Such other considerations deemed necessary by the Quality Board to implement State policy. 6 (e) INSPECTION PROCEDURES DURING ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION - The following principles shall apply to all inspection during actual construction of treatment works financed in part by funds from the Water Quality Enhancement Account. _ (1) In the event construction procedures or materials are deter- mined by the Quality Board or the Executive Director of the Quality Board to be substandard or otherwise unsatisfactory, or not in conformity with approved plans and specifications, the Quality Board or the Executive Director of the Quality Board may order that construction shall cease, pending the adoption of corrective measures. (2) The Quality Board's inspectors are authorized to inspect all work performed and materials furnished. Such inspection may extend to all or to any part of the work and to the prepara- tion or manufacture of the materials to be used therein. An inspector may be stationed at the actual construction site to report to the Executive Director of the Quality Board on the manner and progress of the construction, or to report conditions relating to the materials furnished and the com- pliance by the contractor with approved plans and specifi- cations. Such inspection will not release the contractor from any obligation to perform the work in accordance with the requirements of the contract documents. (3) In those instances where the Quality Board's inspector finds construction procedures or materials to be substandard or otherwise unsatisfactory, or not in conformity with the approved plans and specifications, the inspector shall request the appli- cant's project engineer to reject questionable materials and or suspend further construction until all issues are resolved by the Quality Board. (4) The inspector shall not be authorized to revoke, alter, en- large, or release any requirement of the contract documents, nor to approve or accept any portion of the work, nor to issue instructions contrary to the contract documents. He shall not perform the duties of the contractor or engineer, nor inter- fere with the management of the work. (5) The contractor shall furnish the Quality Board's inspector with every reasonable facility for ascertaining whether or not the work performed is in accordance with the requirements and intent of the contract. (6) Defects in workmanship or materials may be corrected by the Quality Board, and the expense thereof shall be borne by the contractor. The applicant shall pay such expenditures for 7 the contractor from funds withheld from the contractor pursuant to the provisions of Rule 220.1. (f) TESTING OF MATERIALS - Tests by the Quality Board will be in addition to normal testing procedures provided pursuant to con- tract between the applicant and the project engineer. Samples for testing shall be furnished free of cost to the Quality Board, upon request, from materials on the construction site. (g) APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS - Advertising for bids, the execution of a contract for actual construction, or the com- mencement of actual construction prior to the approval of engi- neering plans and specifications may jeopardize the applicant's ability to receive a Federal grant. Therefore except for good cause shown to the Quality Board, financial assistance shall not be provided in the event engineering plans and specifications have not been approved by the Executive Director of the Quality Board and EPA prior to (1) advertising for bids, (2) the execution of a contract for actual construction, or (3) the commencement of actual construction. (h) CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS - All contracts for actual construction shall provide that progress payments shall not exceed ninety percent (90 %) of the amount due at the time of any payment as shown by the project engineer. Such a contract shall also require that upon completion of the contract, the remaining percentage due thereunder may be paid only (1) after approval by the project engineer and (2) after issuance of a certificate of final pro- ject completion by the Executive Director of the Quality Board. The Executive Director of the Quality Board may refuse to give a certificate of final project completion whenever he finds that the applicant has failed to obtain approval of any change in the contract which (1) makes any major alteration in the work re- quired by the plans and specifications or (2) which raises the approved cost. Such a contract shall also require the contractor to observe all Rules of the Quality Board, which contract pro- vision shall constitute an agreement for the benefit of the Quality Board under principles applicable to third party bene- ficiary contracts. In the absence of legally prohibitive cir- cumstance, three certified copies of every contract for actual construction entered into and executed by the political sub - division for the construction of the treatment works shall be submitted to the Executive Director of the Quality Board for approval before loan closure proceedings are initiated. 8 CHAPTER II FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PURCHASE OF BONDS OR OTHER OBLIGATIONS INTRODUCTION These Rules are designed to implement Subchapter G of the Texas Water Quality Act authorizing the sale of bonds, to obtain funds to provide State financial assistance, for construction of treatment works by political sub- divisions. The Development Board is authorized to issue the bonds, which are secured by the general credit of the State of Texas, when directed to do so by the Quality Board. For proper fiscal management, the following accounts will be established: (a) Water Quality Enhancement Account. (b) Water Quality Enhancement Clearance Account. (c) Water Quality Enhancement Interest and Sinking Account. (d) Water Quality Enhancement Reserve. The Water Quality Enhancement Program will be administered to operate on a self supporting basis. To fulfill this objective, bonds purchased for this program must, to the extent possible, be serially retired on scheduled maturity dates to assure State funds will be available to pay principal and interest on bonds issued to provide water quality enhancement funds. To this end, an applicant shall offer bonds of highest grade avail- able (either revenue or tax) and shall set bond maturities as close as practicable to the maturities on State bonds sold to finance the program. PROCEDURE TO INITIATE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE 200. APPLICANT 200.1 FUNCTIONS OF APPLICANT All communications normally will be between the Quality Board and the applicant. The applicant shall oversee the preparation and submission of application documents, represent other participating political subdivisions 9 3 (if any) before the Quality Board, receive and disseminate communications from the Quality Board, and perform other functions prescribed by the Quality Board. 205. APPLICATION FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE BY SALE OF BONDS AND FEDERAL GRANT 205.1 APPLICATION INFORMATION Four (4) copies of the application will be submitted to the Quality Board. The complete application will consist of a transmittal letter and two major components- -one principally in support of State financial assistance, and one principally in support of a Federal grant. This latter component also will provide the necessary technical information for Quality Board action. The component in support of State financial assistance shall be referred to as "S ", and that in support of the Federal grant as "F ". For expeditious administrative preparation and handling, each component shall be separately organized and labeled. Printed forms for Component "S" are not supplied by the Quality Board; however, by following the schedule set forth in Rule 205.2, the application will be in a form acceptable to the Quality Board. Printed forms are available for Component "F" and will be supplied by the Quality Board. Exhibits may be attached in explanation of any item of information requested, but such exhibits shall be identified with the name of the applicant and cross - referenced with the numbered items of the application. Applications not in conformity herewith shall be rejected and returned to the applicant by the Quality Board. Also the Executive Director of the Quality Board, or those acting under his direction, may request additional information as may be reasonably required by the Quality Board or the Development Board for an adequate understanding of the application. Appli- cant's representatives seeking to initiate Quality Board's financial assistance in treatment works construction should visit the offices of the Quality Board and the development fund manager for a preliminary review of proposals. 205.2 REQUIRED GENERAL INFORMATION (COMPONENT "S ") The following items of information are required as part of the appli- cation for financial assistance: 10 (a) The name of the applicant and its principal officers. (b) Name, title, and address of official correspondent or repre- sentative. (c) Name and address of bond counsel and /or other legal counsel. (d) Name and address of financial advisor. (e) A citation of the law(s) under which the political subdivision operates and was created. (f) The total estimated cost of the treatment works. (g) The amount of State financial assistance requested. (h) The method for obtaining the financial assistance, whether by purchase of bonds or other obligations of the political sub - division, by direct loan, or by a combination of these two methods. (i) The plan for repaying the financial assistance. (j) The following information is to be furnished with respect to bonds to be sold to the Development Board and with respect to bonds to be sold in commercial channels to provide funds to pay for cost of treatment works: (1) Citation of statutory authority for issuance. (2) Type of bonds (i.e., general obligation, revenue or combi- nation). If revenues are to be pledged, statement of source and nature of such revenues. (3) Amount of the issue. (4) Full name of the issue. (5) Approximate date of the issue. (6) Proposed maturities. (7) Details of any option for prior payments. (k) Amount and source of any funds to be expended on the treatment works, which are to be derived from sources other than sale of bonds. (1) If political subdivision is authorized by law to levy and collect ad valorem taxes, give following information: 11 • (1) If such right and power have been exercised, give the fol- lowing information for each of the five (5) preceding years: a. Assessed valuation of taxable property. b. Ratio of assessed valuation to actual market value in a specified year. c. Maximum tax rate permitted by law per $100 of assessed valuation. d. Aggregate rate of all taxes levied and aggregate amount in dollars of taxes levied. e. Total dollar value of taxes collected. f. Distribution of tax rate between Interest and Sinking Fund and other purposes. (2) If political subdivision is newly created, or if it has never exercised its taxing power, give the following infor- mation: a. Assessed valuation of taxable property if valuations have been established, and if not, the estimated total amount of the assessed valuation of taxable property, indicating whether the figure represents actual valu- ation or an estimate. b. Maximum tax rate permitted by law per $100 of assessed valuation. c. Ratio of assessed valuation to actual market if assessed valuation has been established. When actual valuation or an estimate is reflected for a. above, indicate pro- posed basis of assessment to be employed by applicant. (m) Give details of any limitation governing amount of bonded or general obligation debt which political subdivision may incur. (n) If political subdivision has bonds outstanding which are payable wholly or in part from advalorem taxes, the following information shall be submitted: (1) A financial statement of outstanding general obligation debt including balances in the various interest and sinding funds. (2) Consolidated schedule of future requirements of principal and interest extended so as to reflect total annual require- ments. 12 (o) If financing treatment works will involve sale of bonds or other obligations to the Development Board or others payable wholly or in part from ad valorem taxes, the following information shall be submitted: (1) Schedule of proposed future maturities of principal and interest of proposed bonds plus total maturities of any out- standing bonds from Rule 205.2(n) above. (2) Rate of interest assumed in computing future interest maturities on proposed bonds. (p) If treatment works for which financial assistance is desired for purpose of extending, enlarging, or improving an existing system or facility, the following shall be submitted for each of the five (5) preceding years, if available: (1) Statement of income and expense for the system. (2) Schedule of service charges. (3) Number of customers. (q) Schedule of proposed service charges or rates required for financing the treatment works under consideration, if different from Rule 205.2(p) above. (r) If political subdivision has bonds outstanding which are payable either wholly or in part from net revenues of a system or facil- ities in connection with which the current treatment works is planned, the following information shall be submitted: (1) A statement of outstanding special obligation debt, including balances in the various interest and sinking funds, and reserves. (2) Consolidated schedule of future requirements of principal and interest extended so as to reflect total annual require ments. (s) If financing of the treatment works will require the sale of bonds to the Development Board or others payable from net revenues of the system, the following additional information shall be submitted: (1) Schedule of proposed future maturities of principal and interest on proposed bonds plus total maturities of any out- standing bonds referred to in Rule 205.2(r) above. 13 (2) Rate of interest assumed in computing future interest re- quirements on proposed bonds. (t) If financing of the treatment works will require the sale of bonds to the Development Board payable either wholly or in part from revenues of contracts with others, a copy of any actual or proposed contract under which as much as 10% of the applicant's gross income is expected to accrue shall be furnished. A copy of such contracts also shall be submitted to the Attorney General of Texas with the bond transcript. (u) Statement as to whether or not there has been a default in pay - ment of items of matured principal or interest, and if so, give details. (v) Annual audit or financial report prepared by an independent auditor as of the close of the last preceding fiscal year. (Not required if applicant has no operating history.) Any item of information required in (1) through (u) may be omitted when contained in the annual audit or financial report. (w) A schedule of the project engineer's estimate of future income A / and expense, showing the estimated amount of pledged net revenues '' to accrue in each year during the life of any revenue bonds to be issued. (x) If a bond election was necessary to authorize bonds to be issued to finance the treatment works, give the election date and elec- tion results as to each proposition submitted. If an election is to be held, then such information shall be furnished after election. (y) A certified copy of a resolution of the governing body requesting financial assistance, authorizing the submission of the appli- cation, designating the official representative for executing the application and appearance before the Quality Board. (z) A pro forma draft of an ordinance, resolution, or similar instrument to be adopted by the governing body and authorizing the issuance of each of the bond issues described in Rules 205.2(o) and 205.2(s). Such ordinance, resolution, or similar instrument shall contain, in addition to the usual provisions, a section providing for final accounting to the Quality Board of the total cost of the treatment works upon completion. Such resolution also shall provide that if the project is finally completed at a total cost less than estimated, the political subdivision shall return to the Development Board the amount of such excess, to the nearest multiple of the denomination of the bonds sold; whereupon the Development Board shall cancel and return a like amount of the bonds. 14 (aa) If bonds to be sold to the Development Board are revenue bonds secured by a subordinate lien, then a copy of a bond resolution of the prior lien bonds shall be furnished. (bb) Schedule of voted, but unissued, sanitary sewer general obliga- tion bonds and water and /or sewer revenue bonds. (cc) A copy of the rule, regulation, order or ordinance of the political subdivision controlling the discharge of material to its waste collection system, and establishing equitable charges to the users of the system, as required by Section 5.06 of the Texas Water Quality Act. (dd) A statement on behalf of the political subdivision executed in affidavit form by the official representative that the facts contained in Component "S" of the application are true and correct according to his best knowledge and belief. 205.3 REQUIRED FEDERAL GRANT DATA AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION (COMPONENT "F ") State and Federal forms are available which, when properly executed, generally cover the requirements for Component "F" of the application. Such forms and the current instructions, are available in the Quality Board offices in Austin, and potential applicants should communicate with the Quality Board staff in this regard. 210. FORMAL ACTION BY THE QUALITY BOARD 210.1 QUALITY BOARD CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION (a) After all requirements and data have been submitted and routine processing by the Quality Board staff is completed, the Executive Director of the Quality Board shall submit the application to the Quality Board, together with his comments and recommendations, and the comments and recommendations of the development fund mana- ger. The comments and recommendations of the development fund manager shall be specific as to the best method for making finan- cial assistance available. (b) In passing upon the application, the Quality Board shall consider: (1) The public benefit to be derived from the treatment works and the propriety of State participation; (2) The development fund manager's recommendations on avail- ' ability of revenue to the political subdivision, from all 1 15 sources, for the ultimate repayment of the cost of the treatment works, including interest; and (3) Such other considerations deemed necessary by the Quality Board to implement State policy. 210.2 ACTION OF THE QUALITY BOARD ON APPLICATION Following consideration of the application and all relevant factors pertaining thereto, the Quality Board may adopt an order of conditional approval with respect to such application. When an order of conditional approval is adopted, it shall set forth the State Priority Rating of the application and shall be a binding commit- ment to provide State financial assistance at the level required to qualify the applicant for the maximum Federal grant possible under Section 8(b) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. 1158, or other applicable Federal law. The order of conditional approval shall be subject to EPA approval of the Federal grant; compliance with the rules; and compliance with the following requirements: (a) Certification by the Executive Director of the Quality Board in the manner provided by Rule 210.3. The certification shall be a condition precedent to the vesting of any right or claim to, or upon, the Texas Water Development Fund, or the Quality Board. (b) Agreement by applicant to indemnify and hold harmless the State of Texas against any and all claims arising from construction of the treatment works. (c) Approval of the applicant's bond ordinance, resolution, or similar instrument by the Executive Director of the Quality Board based on the recommendations of the Development Board acting through the development fund manager. 210.3 STAFF CERTIFICATION OF PROJECT Subsequent to adoption by the Quality Board of an order of conditional approval, the Executive Director of the Quality Board shall review the pro- ject with reference to the terms, conditions, and provisions contained in such order. If he finds that all conditions and stipulations required of the applicant have been satisfied; that final engineering data, including all plans and specifications, are acceptable; and that transmittal of Water Quality Enhancement Funds to the applicant should be accomplished, he shall so certify to the Quality Board. 16 210.4 ENGINEERING DATA PREREQUISITE TO STAFF CERTIFICATION (a) The applicant shall submit for approval copies of plans, speci- fications, and an engineering report, which data shall be as detailed as would be required for submission to contractors bidding on the work, and which shall embrace: (1) The location and description. (2) The existing facilities to be acquired or replaced. (3) The proposed improvements or extensions of existing facilities. (4) The basis of design. (5) The feasibility. (6) The need for the improvements. (7) The itemized estimated cost of construction, including appraisal of any existing facilities to be acquired. (8) The estimated cost of operation and maintenance. (9) The analyses of quality and quantity of sewage transported and /or treated; and impact of waste water on the receiving waters. (10) All details necessary for complete analysis of stresses in the structure and details of arrangement of all works in order that a study of these features may be accomplished. (11) Analyses of infiltration and bypassing. (12) An analysis of flood hazard to the treatment works. (b) Plans, specifications, and estimated costs of proposed improve- ments shall be prepared by a registered professional engineer. (c) Maps prepared and submitted in conjunction with the works shall measure 22" or 24" x 36" outside, with a 2" binding edge at the left; other margins shall be not less than 1/2" wide. (d) All engineering sheets, maps, etc., shall bear a title in the lower right -hand corner showing the facility name, the name and address of the applicant, the county, the sheet number, total number of sheets, a description of details on sheet, and shall 17 bear the seal of a professional engineer registered in the State of Texas. (e) Each set of complete engineering plans and specifications shall be accompanied by a series of maps with scale not less than - 2000' showing: (1) The location and extent of works. (2) The location of lines, pumping plants, treatment plants, and other pertinent structural appurtenances. (3) The course of the river, stream, or other routes of effluent discharge, with the direction of flow indicated. (f) All materials and workmanship shall conform to such engineering specifications adopted by the Quality Board and in effect at the time of filing the application. (g) The actual construction contract shall include a provision requiring general supervision by a registered professional engineer during construction and for inspection by the Quality Board at any time during the construction period. (h) In order to be current, the engineering report required by this section shall have been prepared during that six -month period immediately prior to its submission to the Board in conjunction with an application. If prepared earlier than six months prior to submission, then such engineering report shall be accepted only if accompanied by a statement from the project engineer that he has reviewed the report as originally prepared, and finds that it is substantially current in view of all existing circumstances. (i) Subsequent to staff certification as described by Rule 210.3, neither plans nor specifications shall be changed so as to result in a major alteration or raise the approved cost. 210.5 LEGAL DOCUMENTS PREREQUISITE TO STAFF CERTIFICATION The documents which shall be required prior to staff certification by the Executive Director of the Quality Board shall include the following: (a) Affidavit of project engineer as to sufficiency of funds, including proceeds to be derived from sale of bonds to the Development Board and to others, and any other available funds to complete the pro- ject, including the Federal grant. 18 (b) In those projects involving the sale of revenue bonds to the Development Board or to others, a binder of a corporate surety company authorized to do business in Texas, to execute a Contractor's Performance Bond in an amount equal to One Hundred Percent (100 %) of the actual construction contract cost. (c) Three copies of each actual construction contract to be entered into and executed by the applicant for construction of the treat- ment works. (d) Such other instruments or documents as the Quality Board may determine to be in the public interest and containing such terms and conditions as the order of conditional approval may require. 215. CLOSING PROCEDURE 215.1 INSTRUMENTS REQUIRED FOR CLOSING Upon certification by the Executive Director of the Quality Board as provided in Rule 210.3, the applicant shall make closing arrangements with the development fund manager for the delivery of bonds to be purchased by the Development Board, and for the actual transfer of water quality enhancement funds to the applicant. The applicant shall assume the responsibility for delivery of the bonds in proper form to the Development Board at the office of the State Treasurer, Austin, Texas, accompanied by written instructions to the development fund manager for delivering the proceeds of the bonds, i.e., instructions as to whom the state warrant shall be made payable, and to whom it shall be delivered. Bonds which the Development Board may purchase are required by statute to bear an interest rate, or combination of interest rates, equivalent to the weighted average interest cost for all Texas Water Development Bonds previously issued to provide water quality enhancement funds. Should the Quality Board request the Development Board to issue and sell additional Texas Water Development Bonds prior to date of closing, an adjustment in the purchase price may be made so as to comply with the statutory require ment. Documents which shall be required by the Development Board prior to closing shall include the following: (a) Certification of the Executive Director of the Quality Board to the Quality Board that all conditions and stipulations required of the applicant have been satisfied; that final engineering data, including all specifications are acceptable; and that 19 actual transmittal of Water Development Funds to the applicant should be accomplished. (b) Executed copy of ordinance, resolution, or similar instrument adopted by the governing body authorizing issuance of bonds or other obligations sold to the Development Board, as approved pursuant to Rule 210.2(c). (c) Executed copies of each contract required by Rule 205.2(t). (d) Unqualified approving opinions of the Attorney General of Texas as to the legality of bonds sold to the Development Board, and also as to any bonds sold to finance the balance of the treat- ment works cost, on each of which opinions shall appear a certification from the State Comptroller of Public Accounts that such bonds have been registered in his office. (e) Unqualified approving opinion by a recognized bond attorney acceptable to the Development Board as to legality of bonds or other obligations, sold to the Development Board and to others, if any. Such attorney shall also furnish the Development Board a tran- script of the proceedings relating to the bonds or other obli- gations purchased by the Development Board which shall contain those instruments normally furnished a purchaser of a bond issue; however, the applicant need not duplicate any material previously supplied to the Development Board. 220. ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION PHASE FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROJECTS 220.1 GENERAL INFORMATION Although the legal relationship of the State to the applicant under the Financial Assistance Program is primarily that of a bond holder, the Constitution and statutes authorizing the Financial Assistance Program impose additional responsibilities and restrictions, on both the Quality Board and the applicant, designed to provide additional assurance for the stability and security of the Water Quality Enhancement Program. Additional restrictions include the requirement for withholding not less than ten (10 %) of the construction installment payments pending final certification by the Executive Director of the Quality Board of the completed project in accordance with statutorily prescribed criteria. Incidental to this retainage and final treatment works approval requirement is the right of inspection during construction, and the duty to review for approval all 20 proposed changes in the engineering plans of treatment works when such changes are of a substantial or material nature. Consequently, by virtue of the legal requirements of continuing con- trol and supervision by the Quality Board of the construction progress, the relationship between the Quality Board and applicant represents more than that of mere lender and borrower, and in many respects approaches a type of partnership for the enhancement of water resources from which the entire State will ultimately benefit. 220.2 AWARDING CONTRACTS FOR ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION The applicant shall be responsible for assuring that every appro- priate procedure and incidental legal requirement is observed prior to advertising for bids and awarding the contract for actual construction including required EPA approvals. The text of the contract for actual construction shall be approved by the Quality Board prior to advertisement of bids for actual construction. 220.3 SUPERVISION OF ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION After the contract for actual construction is awarded, the applicant shall provide for adequate supervision of the project by the project engineer to assure that the work is performed in a satisfactory manner in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, and approved alter- ations, and in accordance with sound engineering principles and practices. The Quality Board, or its authorized agent, shall have the privilege of inspecting the actual construction of any treatment works at any time in order to assure that plans and specifications are being followed, and that the works are being constructed in accordance with sound engineering principles and practices, but such inspection shall never subject the State of Texas to any action for damages. The Quality Board's inspector shall bring to the attention of both the applicant's project engineer and the contractor any variances from the approved plans and specifications. The project engineer shall initiate necessary corrective action. 220.4 ALTERATIONS IN APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS If after Quality Board approval of engineering plans and specifi- cations, it becomes apparent that changes are necessary in such plans and /or specifications and that these changes would result in a major alteration or raise the approved cost, they shall be submitted to the Executive Director of the Quality Board for approval, and when possible, well in advance of the construction alteration. If there is an immediate danger to life or property, tentative approval of change orders may be 21 secured from the Executive Director of the Quality Board by telephone and confirmed by letter or telegram. A proposed change order should be accompanied by a cost estimate and contain sufficient information, with plans or sketches, to enable the Quality Board staff to evaluate the pro- posed change order. Engineering computation shall be included if struc- tural changes are involved. After approval of the proposed alterations by the Executive Director of the Quality Board and EPA, copies of the ap- proved change order shall be forwarded to the applicant, the project engineer, and appropriate contractors. 220.5 ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION COST OVERRUNS Should any bid exceed the amount estimated by the project engineer but be nevertheless recommended as acceptable by the project engineer, a report thereof immediately shall be made by the applicant to the Quality Board, which shall have the right to require a delay in the award of the contract until such time as the Quality Board may determine that such award will not jeopardize completion of construction of the treatment works by reason of expenditure of funds in excess of the amount available and necessary to meet all required construction expenditures. Whenever the project engineer makes a new estimate of treatment works costs which exceeds the estimated costs approved by the Quality Board and EPA, the applicant may submit an application to the Quality Board for an increase in State finan- cial assistance and an increase in the Federal grant. 22 CHAPTER III FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE DIRECT LOANS AND OBLIGATIONS OTHER THAN BONDS 300. POLICY 300.1 STATE POLICY It is the intent that bonds purchased by the Development Board will be marketable in the municipal bond market, thereby providing a revolving fund for the continuing purchasing of political subdivision bonds, and extending the use of the State bond program for water quality enhancement. Direct loans and obligations other than bonds are not marketable in the public market. Therefore, it is the policy of the State of Texas to utilize direct loans or to purchase obligations other than bonds, to provide water quality enhancement funds only as a last resort. A polit- ical subdivision will not be regarded as being unable to issue bonds because it is inconvenient or because an election will be required to authorize the issuance of bonds. In the event of an unsuccessful election, and in other appropriate cases, the purchase of bonds pursuant to the Compact will be given preference over a direct loan or the purchase of obligations other than bonds. 305. FORMAL ACTION BY THE QUALITY BOARD 305.1 QUALITY BOARD CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION No application for a direct loan shall be granted unless the Quality Board, on the advice of the Executive Director of the Quality Board and on the recommendations of the Development Board acting through the development fund manager, shall find, after consideration as outlined in Rule 110.2(d), that: (a) the applicant is unable to issue bonds or other obligations for construction of treatment works for which a Federal grant is to be made, and, (b) the applicant has sources of revenue which can be pledged, of not less than the amount necessary to repay the principal of and interest on the loan over a period of time. 23 305.2 LOAN AGREEMENT Before the delivery of any water quality enhancement funds to the appli- cant, the Quality Board shall, with the advice of the Executive Director of the Quality Board and on the recommendations of the Development Board acting through the development fund manager, execute a loan agreement pro- viding the time period for proper payment of principal and interest to the appropriate account. Such loan agreement shall be agreeable to the Development Board and shall be approved by the Attorney General of Texas. Such loan agreement shall be accompanied by proof of the matter set forth in Section 7.10(e) of Subchapter G of the Texas Water Quality Act (Section 21.10(e), Texas Water Code). If the loan agreement is payable from revenues, the appli- cant shall submit copies of rate orders and /or ordinances setting utility rates, as well as certified copies of the engineer's projections of in- come. 305.3 APPLICATION INFORMATION Applicants contemplating financial assistance by a direct loan shall comply with the provisions of Sections 205.1, 205.2, and 205.3, as appro- priate, of these Rules. It is especially important that these applicants consult with the staff of the Quality Board prior to submitting an appli- cation so as to be properly informed as to the information which will be required. The Executive Director of the Quality Board will refer appli- cants to the Development Board where necessary for further consultation on the submission of an application. 24 CHAPTER IV FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE STATE OF TEXAS WATER POLLUTION CONTROL COMPACT BONDS INTRODUCTION; USE OF THE COMPACT The State of Texas Water Pollution Control Compact may be used to provide the required State payment in each instance when a political sub- division wishes to use and proceed through a Signatory to the Compact in applying for and obtaining a Federal grant pursuant to the Compact, under terms and conditions mutually agreeable to the political subdivision and such Signatory. When the Compact is so used, it shall constitute a proper method for making the required State payment, as provided in the Compact, and as provided by Section 21.095 of the Texas Water Code, and in each such instance the political subdivision and the Signatory to the Compact shall execute and file with the Quality Board a memorandum agreement between the political subdivision and the Signatory evidencing compliance with the Compact. Bonds issued by a Signatory to the State of Texas Water Pollution Control Compact pursuant to the Compact and Section 21.095 of the Texas Water Code shall be purchased by the Development Board, upon the direction of the Quality Board, with money received from the sale of Texas Water Development Bonds pursuant to Article III, Section 49 -d -1, Texas Consti- tution. These bonds will be purchased under terms and conditions that are mutually agreeable to the Signatory, the Quality Board, and the Development Board. 25 APPENDIX OF FORMS (For Illustration Only) AN ORDER OF THE TEXAS WATER QUALITY BOARD CONDITIONALLY APPROVING AN APPLICATION TO PURCHASE BONDS ISSUED BY A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, the XYZ Authority, to be hereinafter referred to as the Authority" has proposed to construct sewage treatment works project located (here follows complete description) , to be herein referred to as "the project ", and WHEREAS, the Authority, on the day of , 19 , filed an application with the Texas Water Quality Board for a Federal grant and for State financial assistance in the construction of the project in the amount of ($ ) Dollars, as authorized by Section 49 -d -1 of Article III of the Texas Constitution, Subchapter G of the Texas Water Quality Act, and by the Joint Rules, Regulations, and Policies of the Texas Water Quality Board and the Texas Water Development Board; and WHEREAS, funds totaling ($ ) Dollars, are required for construction of the proposed project, all as appears more fully in the application and other instruments filed in con- junction therewith to which reference is made for all purposes; and WHEREAS, the Authority proposes to issue and offer for sale to the Development Board its bonds as security for the loan totaling ($ ) Dollars; and A -2 WHEREAS, in accordance with Subchapter G of the Water Quality Act, the Quality Board has carefully considered all matters required by law and in particular the following: 1. The public benefit to be derived from the project and the propriety of State participation; 2. The availability of revenue to the political subdivision, from all sources, for the ultimate repayment of the cost of the project, including interest; and 3. Other relevant factors; NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDERED by the Quality Board that the State Priority Rating of Authority is ; and BE IT FURTHER ORDERED by the Quality Board that said Board hereby finds that the public interest requires State participation in the project of the Authority in the total amount of ($ ) Dollars; that the maximum Federal grant cannot be ob- tained without State financial assistance in the amount of ($ ) Dollars; that the revenues pledged by the Authority will be sufficient to meet all obligations assumed by said Authority within the repayment period, which is not more than forty (40) years; and based on the foregoing, financial assistance to the Authority, in the total amount of ($ ) A -3 Dollars, is hereby conditionally approved SUBJECT TO AND CONDITIONED UPON the following terms, conditions, and provisions: 1. Provided the Authority shall submit to the Executive Director of the Quality Board final engineering plans and specifications for the treatment works, which engineering plans and specifications shall be unconditionally approved and certified in the manner provided by Rule 210.2 of the Joint Rules, Regulations, and Policies of the Quality Board, and the Development Board. 2. Provided the Authority shall indemnify and hold harmless the State of Texas against any and all claims and causes of action arising from the construction, acquisition, operation, and maintenance of the project. 3. Provided the Executive Director of the Quality Board shall review the project with reference to the terms, conditions, and provisions related herein and contained in the Joint Rules, Regulations, and Policies of the Texas Water Quality Board and the Texas Water Development Board, and on the basis of such review, shall certify that all terms, con- ditions, and provisions required by (1) the Constitution and Laws of the State of Texas; (2) the Joint Rules, Regulations, and Policies of the Texas Water Quality Board and the Texas Water Development Board; and (3) the specific A -4 fl stipulations herein contained and recorded, have been satisfied. The certification of the Executive Director of 4 the Texas Water Quality Board shall be a condition precedent to vesting of any right or claim to or upon the Texas Water Development Fund or the Quality Board. 4. Provided the Authority shall promptly tender a final accounting of all project costs and expenditures, such accounting shall be in a form and manner acceptable to the Quality Board and certified correct by a Certified Public Accountant. ( 5. Provided the Executive Director of the Quality Board, based upon the recommendations of the Development Board acting through the development fund manager, shall subsequently approve the Authority's bond ordinance, resolution, or sim- ilar instruments authorizing the issuance of bonds to finance the project herein described. 6. Provided that if the project is finally completed at a total cost less than estimated, the Authority shall return to the Development Board the amount of such excess to the nearest multiple of ($ ) Dollars, whereupon the Development Board shall cancel and deliver to the Authority a like amount of the Authority's bonds held by the Development Board. x E A -5 r • BE IT RESOLVED that the consulting engineer firm of , which firm has been nominated by the Authority to perform the functions of project engineer, is deemed to be qualified and acceptable to be employed for such responsibility, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the actual construction contract and successfully bidding contractor shall be approved by the Quality Board, acting through its Executive Director. Adopted this day of , 19 _ , A.D. A -6 I 2.4 VA . U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION .��. e fr,*[S O` �+ SOUTHWESTERN REGIONAL OFFICE 702 COLORADO STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 February 14, 1972 7 Mr. Ran Boswell City Manager 101 Church Street, N. College Station, Texas 77840 L __ Re: EDA Project No. 08 -1 -00959 City of College Station, Texas Dear Mr. Boswell: Our review of the plans and specifications, submitted for the above project, discloses that the following items must be received and approved before we can authorize you to advertise for bids: A. Contract Documents 1. EDA Form ED -116, Item No. 1: Change the bid holding period from 30 to 60 days. 2. EDA Form ED-118, Contract B: Change the bid holding period from 30 to 60 days. 3. Part H, Special Instructions, Page No. H -2, H.6: Photographs; delete entire item. Photographs must be paid for by the Owner. 4. Part X, Detail Specifications: Item 8h, Page XX -11 and Items Nos. 13h and 15, Page XX -16, the words "or equal" must be inserted after brand names of equipment. 5. Part C, Structural Concrete, Item C.28, Design and Testing: All expenses for the design of the concrete mixture and the 1 testing of the cylinders taken during construction will be paid for by the Owner. i B. Plans The sewer collection lines, designated in the project applica- tion, are not included in the proposed construction. Please advise this office of your plans regarding this part of the 4 project. 4 4 2 In addition, the following items remain to be submitted for approval prior to our approval of advertisement for bids, as required by the EDA "Requirements for Approved Projects ": 1. CM- FF -(1) and (2), "Certificates as to Project Site, Rights -of -Way and Easements ". 2. Documentation to clear Special Condition "A" to the Grant Agreement. 3. An executed copy of the Uniform Relocation Assistance Certificate. 4. EPA and State Health Department approvals of the plans and specifications. 5. Form ED -151 (Engineer Certification). 6. Form ED -1004, "Depository Bank Acceptance and Confirmation Statement ". 7. Proof of honesty bond in the amount of $50,000. 8. Construction finance plan, including interim financing, with a cash flow diagram. 9. A copy of your Attorney Agreement (letter). 10. Your current Engineer's cost estimate. If you have any questions on the above items, or if you require additional information pertinent thereto, please contact Mr. John Marino, Project Engineer, Telephone No. AC 512/397 -5826. Sincerely, ugh M. Farmer, P.E. Chief, Technical Support Division cc: Riewe & Wischmeyer, Inc. Mayor Dick Hervey P R., R 7 A j gxas $ta !parimrtt of Pruitt! JAMES E. PEAVY, M.O., M.P.H. BOARD OF HEALTH COMMISSIONER OF - HEALTH AUSTIN, TEXAS HAMPTON C. ROBINSON, M.D., CHAIRMAN ROBERT D. MORETON, M.D., VICE - CHAIRMAN W. KENNETH THURMOND, D.D.S., SECRETARY J. B. COP EL AND. M.D. N. L. BARKER JR., M.D. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHARLES MAX COLE, M. D. February 16, 1972 JOHN M GSMITH ,IR.. ^. D D. MICKIE JESS WAYNE WEST, R. PH. ROYCE E. WISENBAK ER, M. 5. ENG. S -CJMc Riewe and Wischmeyer, RE: College Station, Texas Incorporated Waste Treatment Consulting Engineers Plant Improvements 8533 Ferndale Road EDA Project Dallas, Texas 75238 Number 08 -1 -00959 Gentlemen: We have completed our review of your plans and specifications for the above referenced project. The plans for improvement conform to the Design Criteria of the Texas State Department of Health and are here- with approved. Your attention is called to the hydraulic transfer point between the mixing and re - aeration basin and it is our suggestion that some meth- od of flow control between the two chambers be installed. It is our understanding that you intend to install an additional 1.5 M G D contact stabilization unit, complete with measuring device, mech- anical grit removal facilities, additional sludge drying beds, storm water clarifier, chlorination facilities, mechanical bar screen, and lift station. Riewe and Wischmeyer, Incorporated Page Two February 16, 1972 If we may be of any further assistance to you, please let us know. Very truly yours, 7 Chandler J. McE., Engineer III Plans and Specifications Division of Wastewater Technology and Surveillance CJMc /dec ccs: Honorable A. B. Hervey, Mayor City of College Station Ran Boswell, City Manager City of College Station Economic Development Administration ATTN: John Marino Bryan - Brazos County Health Department Local Health Services Region IV Texas Water Quality Board ATTN: Robert G. Fleming, P.E. 2 2. Documentation to clear Special Condition "A" to the Grant Agreement. 3. An executed copy of the Uniform Relocation Assistance Certificate. 4. EPA Certificate of Adequacy of Treatment. 5. Form ED -151, "Engineer's Certificate ". 6. Form ED -1004, "Depository Bank Acceptance and Confirmation Statement ". 7. Proof of honesty bond in the amount of $50,000. 8. Construction finance plan, including interim financing, with a cash flow diagram. 9. A copy of your Attorney Agreement (letter). If you have any questions on the above items, or if you require additional information pertinent thereto, please contact Mr. John Marino, Project Engineer, Telephone No. AC 512/397 -5826. Sincerely, Yl t. 6f 2k-V h M. Farmer, P.E. Chief, Technical Support Division cc: Riewe & Wischmeyer, Inc. Mayor Dick Hervey i March 13, 1972 Mr. Hugh M. Farmer, P. E. Chief, Technical Support Division Economic Development Administration 702 Colorado Street Austin, Texas 78701 Re: EDA Project No. 08 -1 -00959 Waste Water Treatment Plang and Water System Improvements College Station, Texas Dear Mr. Farmer: This is to advise you that the University National Bank of College Station, Texas, has agreed to provide interim financing for the above numbered pro - ject. The amount of the loan will be 25% of the project cost, with an annual percentage rate of 4 %. If any other information is needed regarding this financing, please let us know. Sincerely, Ran Boswell City Manager City of College Station, Texas RB /nr t 1 ' . THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATI I 1 1101 TEXAS AVENUE• 77840 I I TEXAS •1• March 15, 1972 4 Mr. Hugh M. Farmer, P. E. Chief, Technical Support Division Economic Development Administration 702 Colorado Street Austin, Texas 78701 Re: EDA Project No. 08 -1 -00959 City of College Station, Texas Dear Mr. Farmer: This letter is in reference to your correspondence of February 28, 1972 pertaining to the above project. Relative to Paragraph 2, it is agreed that the City of College Station will hear all expenses for the design of concrete mixture and testing of cylinders taken during trie construction of the project. In Paragraph 3 concerning certain collector lines that were designed in the original appli- cation which were deleted in this project, we wish to advise that the lines have either been installed by City forces or found that they were not feasible at this time. In Paragraph 4, you had a question about the over -run and whether or not the City was in a position to pay this cost. The College Station City Council realizes that there will be an over -run on this project and is in a position to pay the proposed over -run. In the final design of the waste water plant, the City Council directed the engineer to increase the capacity of the plant and at the same time obligated certain City funds to pay the cost of the increased capacity. } Relative to the requirements referred to in Paragraph 5: 1. At this time we have not secured all of the easements that are required in this project, however, we hope to have all of the easements within ten days. At that time we will mail you the proper forms of certification as to project site and right -of -way easements. 2. This information is being mailed to you in a special communication. ' 3. We are enclosing an executed copy of the uniform relocation assistance certificate. 4. The engineer is handling this item for us. 5. The engineer is also handling the "Engineer's Certificate', form ED -151. 1 • Page 2 6. We are enclosing form #ED -1004 which is signed by Mr. Joe R. Sawyer, President of the University National Bank of College Station, that has to do with depository bank • acceptance and confirmation statement. 7. We are enclosing a copy of the honesty bond in the amount of $50, 000.00 for • Florence Neelley, Director of Finance, and $50, 000.00 for Ran Boswell, City Manager. I wish to refer you to Rider 2 which is dated February 10, 1972, which is made a part of the insurance policy dated January 31, 1971. 8. We are enclosing a project flow of funds for this project. We are also enclosing a letter to you under my signature advising you that the University National Bank of College Station, Texas has agreed to provide interim financing. The amount of the loan will be 25% of the project cost with an annual percentage rate of 4 %. Also enclosed is a letter from Mr. Joe R. Sawyer, President, University National Bank, concerning interim financing. 9. This item has been taken care of in a recent communication to you. If you need further information, please contact us. Sincerely, 199 „if • Ran Boswel City Manager RB /nr Enclosures • • 4. RELOCATION ASSISTANCE CERTIFICATE • • Name of Project Water and Sewer Imps o'vements • City and State College Station, Texas Project Nuclbcr 08 -1- 00.959 • TEx is $ta Prpartnwitt of peu1f1 JAMES E. PEAVY, M.D., M.P.H. BOARD OF HEALTH COMMISSIONER OF HEALTH AUSTIN, TEXAS HAMPTON C. ROBINSON, M.D., CHAIRMAN ROBERT D. MORETON. M.D., VICE- CHAIRMAN W. KENNETH THURMOND, D.D.S., SECRETARY J. B. COPEL AND, M.D. N. L. BARKER JR., M.D. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHARLES MAX COLE, M. D. MICKIE G. HOLCOMB, D. O. JOHN M. SMITH JR., M. D. JESS WAYNE WEST, R. PH. February 17, 1972 ROYCE E. WI SEN BAK ER, M. S. ENG. Riewe and Wischmeyer, Inc. Consulting Engineers 8533 Ferndale Road Dallas, Texas 75238 Attention: W. J. Wischmeyer, P. E. Subject: EDA Financed Water System Improvements City of College Station Brazos County, Texas Gentlemen: We are in receipt of plans and specifications for the subject system. It is noted that the proposed improvements are to consist of the installation of 8,300 linear feet of 18 inch Ductile Iron Pipe, 6,200 linear feet of 12 inch Cast Iron Pipe, 40 linear feet of 8 inch Cast Iron Pipe and related appurtenances. We have completed our review of the above planning material and it appears to be prepared in general conformity with good public health engineering practices and our current standards. Your cooperation in submitting this planning material for our review is appreciated, and it is hoped that the proposed facilities can be provided at an early date. • • :i)]e to comply fully with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Land .1,cqui sition Policies Act: of 1970, 34 Stat. 1594, including, but not limited • to, sections 210, 213(b) (3) and 305 thereof, If I have indicated that the crantee /l3orro\ :e1: or Applicant is not able to • comply, • I have attached my opinion • indicating with which sections or portions of such sections tale Grantee /Borrower • Or Applicant is not able to comply and the basis for my opinion including appropriate citations to applicable law. I do further certify that I shall inform the appropriate E111 Regional Offices of any changes in State or loch law which will modify my opinion as delivered , to you herewith. . • Dated this -13th day 62 March • , 1972. • • Signature Don Dillon I • • City of College Station, Texas Attorney for Grantee /Borrower or Appli'can . For the purpose of this Certificate, the term: 1. "displaced person" means any individual, partnership, corporation, or association who moves from real property or moves his personal property, business or farm operation from real property as a result of the acquisition in whole or in part of, or the written order to vacate, real property in connection with the abo -named project; • 2. "business" means any lawful activity, excepting a farm operation, conducted primarily - (a) For the purchase, sale, lease and rental of personal and real property, and for the manufacture, processing or marketing of products, commodities, or any other personal property; • . (b) For the sale of services to the public; (c) By a non - profit organization; or • (d) For assisting in the purchase, sale, resale, manufacture, processing, or marketing of products, commodities, personal property, or services by the erection and maintenance of an outdoor advertising display or displays, whether or not such display or displays are located on the premises on which any of the above activities arc conducted; and • • • 3 • • • 3. farm operation moans any activity conducted solely or primarily for the production Of One or more agricultural products or commodities, • including timber, for sa]e or home use, and customarily producing such products or commodities in sufficient quantity to be capable of cont:r. i.but:- ,• inf materially to the operator's support. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I DudAct Du re.0 No. 41- k23641 Ayyrov.l Expire frec.mb., i . 1771 •c, E0.1004 U.S. OEPART,. CNT Or COMMt:RCC Project No. I 11i -..1 ECONOMIC O[VCLOPM[NT AOMINIaTItAT1ON 08 -1 -00959 � ' Project Title Waste Treatment Plant Improvements DEPOSITORY BANK ACCEPTANCE AND & Water System Improvement • CONFIRMATION STATEMENT Date March 13, 1972 Name of Gr•ntee /Borrower City of College Station, Texas I. re will accept from time to time, for deposit, monies of the Grantee /Borrower named above and the Economic Develeymenc . Administration for defraying the coat of the project identified above and will at all times keep such monies in • separate I account or accounts designated. • Fund Series 1971 B S Revenue Bond F Water „d + OP I 11. We wish to advise that •s of the date of this Statement the Grantee /Borrower named above has deposited • $ 420 000 1 into the above -named account of accounts., t E III. This banit. is • member of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation i k IV. Only the following t Y s persons have been I authorized to make disbursements from ( the account described above. f University National Bank I Coryotate Name of an Florence Neelley •College Station, Texas ■ Ran Boswell Address • ` By s .� .L� Signature of Authorized Officer I iJ i i March 13, 19'72 President i 1 Date Title of Officer i I STATEMENT OF GRANTEE /BORROWER E r 1 1 I (We) understand that disbursements from the account described above may be made only foe authorized costs of the raj• -r noted. 1 S ,,...a.,----z_Lie-4 . • . 1 • ----., Authorized Aepresentat ve of the Grantee /Borrower. 1 . City Manager Title G -- I - . l • oacOMM -OC •)3 * -••• I Ex•`� i5 is E. e) l i E . PUBLIC EMPLOYEES BLANKET BOND FIDE L ITYAND )' EPOSI t I COMPANY OF MARYLAND A STOCK COMPANY— ESTABLISHED 1890 — BALTIMORE, MO. 21203 (Herein Called Surety) ::--; ir i co N No. 84 85 _ O6 9 DECLARATIONS ITEM 1. Name of Obligee: � INSURANCEaNDBONDS siNCE 18� -' " ri ...! „, _ r , ,/ CITY OF COLLEGE STATION ' ' - c' ' //Z / r COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS �^, i ITEM 2. Name of Insured: f CITY OF COLLEGE STATION COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS ITEM 3. Bond Period: from the beginning of January 31st, 1 9 7 1 Month Day Year to 12 o'clock night on the effective date of the cancelation or termination of this Bond as an entirety. ITEM 4. Table of Limits of Liability: INSURING AGREEMENT 1— Honesty Blanket Bond Coverage $ ........._AT:.__ INSURING AGREEMENT 2— Honesty Blanket Position Bond Coverage $._._.__11.11._..._._. INSURING AGREEMENT 3— Faithful Performance Blanket Bond Coverage $_...__._..L!71. INSURING AGREEMENT 4— Faithful Performance Blanket Position Bond Coverage $._...2,.5ASL QQ ITEM 5. The liability of the Surety is subject to the terms of the following riders attached hereto: RIDER 1 TEXAS RIDER (F4683) ITEM 6. The Obligee and the Insured by the acceptance of this Bond give notice to Surety terminating or canceling prior bond(s) I\'o.(s).__._.._____._. _ NO EXCEPTIONS such termination or cancelation to be effective as of the time this Bond becomes effective. ' , i (d _cCountersigned by �`' k..-- Authorized Representative P111 -5M, 3 -68 177796 Revised to May, 1958 (SR 5655) PEBB - Page 1 of 4 RIDER 1 To be attached to and form part of Bond No 84 85 906 Obligee__._ _ CITY OF COLLE STATION 1wO.LL 5.I °,.TI.Q TE X^;S Insured_____ .......... _...... __ _..... _. CITY OF C O L L E C I E STATION COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS It is agreed that: 1. Additional indemnity, in accordance with the terms of such of the Insuring Agreements in force under the attached bond as are specifically designated opposite the following positions, respectively, is granted by this rider on Employees performing the duties of such positions, to the amount set opposite the names of such positions, respectively. 2. The liability of the Surety under this rider on account of any one Employee in any one or more of such positions (in the original or an increased or decreased amount) shall not exceed the largest single amount of indemnity on any one position occupied by such Employee. 3. No losses shall be recoverable under this rider unless caused by an Employee who has been identified as having caused such loss, anything to the contrary in said bond or this rider notwithstanding. Total Number Amount of Position Location Insuring of Employees Additional Agreement in each Indemnity on Position each Employee DIRECTOR OF FINANCE COLLEGE STATION, IV 1 $7,500.00 TEXAS 4. This rider is effective as of..._____ _anuary 31st, 1971 FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND ATTEST: By ,/ 4 Secretary President Countersigned bye_ _.__ ._. . __ Authorised Representative P198 -5M, 3 -68 177798 Additional Indemnity Rider—For use with Public Employees Blanket Bond and Public School System Employees Blanket Bond, to provide additional indemnity coverage. Revised to May, 1958. (SR 5661) The Surety, in consideration of the payment of the premium, and subject to the Declarations made a part hereof, the General Agreement, Conditions and Limitations and other terms of this Bond, agrees, in accordance with such . of the Insuring Agreements hereof as arc specifically designated by the insertion of an amount of indemnity in the Table of Limits of Liability, to indemnify the Obligee for the use and benefit of the Insured for: INSURING AGREEMENTS Honesty Blanket Bond Coverage 1. Loss sustained by the Insured through any fraudulent or dishonest act or acts committed by any of the Employees, acting alone or in collusion with others, during the Bond Period, to an amount not exceeding in the aggregate the amount stated in the Table of Limits of Liability applicable to this Insuring Agreement 1. Honesty Blanket Position Bond Coverage 2. Loss sustained by the Insured through any fraudulent or dishonest act or acts committed by any of the Employees acting alone or in collusion with others, during the Bond Period, the amount of indemnity on each of such Employees being the amount stated in the Table of Limits of Liability applicable to this Insuring Agreement 2. Faithful Performance Blanket Bond Coverage 3. Loss caused to the Insured through the failure of any of the Employees, acting alone or in collusion with others, to perform faithfully his duties or to account properly for all monies and property received by virtue of his position or employment during the Bond Period to an amount not exceeding in the aggregate the amount stated in the Table of Limits of Liability applicable to this Insuring Agreement 3. Faithful Performance Blanket Position Bond Coverage 4. Loss caused to the Insured through the failure of any of the Employees, acting alone or in collusion with others, to perform faithfully his duties or to account properly for all monies and property received by virtue of his position or employment during the Bond Period, the amount of indemnity on each of such Employees being the amount stated in the Table of Limits of Liability applicable to this Insuring Agreement 4. GENERAL AGREEMENT Loss Under Prior Bond If the coverage of an Insuring Agreement of this Bond is substituted for any prior bond carried by the Insured or by any predecessor in interest of the Insured which prior bond is terminated, canceled or allowed to expire as of the time of such substitution, the Surety agrees that such Insuring Agreement applies to loss sustained by, or caused to, the Insured, as the case may be, prior to or during the Bond Period, provided that such loss is discovered after the beginning of the Bond Period and prior to the expiration of three years from the cancelation of this Bond as an entirety and that such loss would have been recoverable by the Insured or such predecessor under such prior bond except for the fact that the time within which to bring suit, action or proceeding of any kind thereunder had expired, and provided further: (1) the indemnity afforded by this General Agreement shall be a part of and not in addition to the amount of coverage afforded by the - applicable Insuring Agreement of this Bond; and (2) such loss would have been covered under such Insuring Agreement had such Insuring Agreement with its agreements, conditions and limitations as of the time of such substitution been in force when the acts or defaults causing such loss were committed; and (3) recovery under such Insuring Agreement on account of such loss shall in no event exceed the amount which would have been recover- able under such Insuring Agreement in the amount for which it is written as of the time of such substitution, had such Insuring Agreement been in force when such acts or defaults were committed, or the amount which would have been recoverable under such prior bond had such prior bond continued in force until the discovery of such loss if the latter amount be smaller. THE FOREGOING INSURING AGREEMENTS AND GENERAL AGREEMENT ARE SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS: Definitions Unidentifiable Employee SECTION 1. The following terms, as used in this Bond, shall have. SECTION 2. In case a loss is alleged to have been caused to the the respective meanings stated in this Section: Insured through acts or defaults by an Employee covered under an "Employee" as used in Insuring Agreements 1 and 2 means a applicable Insuring Agreement of this Bond, while such Insuring person while in the employ of the Insured during the Bond Period Agreement is in full force and effect and the Insured shall be unable who is not required by law to give bond conditioned for the faithful to designate the specific Employee causing such loss, the Insured st ies and who is a member of the staff or per- shall nevertheless have the benefit of such insuring Agreement pro- not mean any Treasurer or Tax Col- vided that the evidence submitted reasonably establihes that the lc known. loss was in fact caused by such Employee through such acts or de- , c as used in Insuring Agreements 3 and 4 means a per- faults and provided, further, that regardless of the number of such son while in the employ of the Insured during the Bond Period who Employees concerned or implicated in such loss, the aggregate lia- is not required by law to furnish an Individual Bond to qualify for bility of the Surety for any such loss shall not exceed the amount office and who is a member of the staff or personnel of the Insured stated in Item 4 of the Declarations applicable to such Insuring but does not mean any Treasurer or Tax Collector by whatever title Agreement. known. PEBB - Page 2 of 4 • RIDER 1 To be attached to and form part of Bond No 84 85 9O6 Obligee _.__________ ___ CITY OF COLLE:1E STATION • EO.LL :::E ,TI.Q `:�.TF Y,A S Insured CITY OF C O L I_ E i E STATION COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS I t is agreed that: • 1 1. Additional indemnity, in accordance with the terms of such of the Insuring Agreements in force under the attached bond as are I specifically designated opposite the following positions, respectively, is granted by this rider on Employees performing the duties of such i positions, to the amount set opposite the names of such positions, respectively. 2. The liability of the Surety under this rider on account of any one Employee in any one or more of such positions (in the original or an increased or decreased amount) shall not exceed the largest single amount of indemnity on any one position occupied by such Employee. 3. No losses shall be recoverable under this rider unless caused by an Employee who has been identified as having caused such loss, anything to the contrary in said bond or this rider notwithstanding. Total Number Amount of Position Location Insuring of Employees Additional Agreement in each Indemnity on Position each Employee ) i 1 DIRECTOR OF FINANCE COLLEGE STATION, IV 1 $7,500.00 i TEXAS i i j I • • • 4. This rider is effective as of January 31st, 1971 FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND ATTEST: BY (' • ,,,e,(2.44.••••• # Algot Secretary President Countersigned by:._....._: " / ' `" `-'Z /...- ` �� -✓ Authorised Representative P198-5M, 3 -68 177798 Addition.1 Indemnity Rider —For use with Public Employees Blanket Bond and Public School System Employee. Blanket Bond, to provide additional indemnity coverage. Revised to May, 1958. (SR 5661) ti RIDER 2 To be attached to and form part of Bond No...1i:...51...9Q _.. _. _ Oblit;t�- — .._.._.._.— - -- QI�C. 'T([TIOIj_ -- _......_._ ._.._.._ College Station, Texas.....».._..... ....._._. » .................... - ----- .._... _ , Insured ......_...._.._._._.._._._._ —.._... » Q I `TX...QQ CQ.JtL i.CaT+ TATJ Q Caleg.....S....on.,...- .oxaa _...._. __._...___ In consideration of certain premium adjustments, it is agreed that the Additional Indemnity Rider attached to and forming part of the attached bond is hereby amended, effective on and after the date set opposite the designation of each position, respectively, as hereinafter set forth: 1. By deleting therefrom the following: Effective Insuring ocat Number of Amount of Add Date Position Location Agreement Employees ees in tional Indemnit eac h Position on each Employee 2 - 10 - 72 DIRECTOR OF FINANCE College Station, IV 1 $7,500.00 Texas • 2. By adding thereto the following: Effective Insuring ocat Number of Amount of Addi- Date Position Lion Agreement Employees in tional Indemnity each Position on each Employee • 2 -10 -72 DIRECTOR OF FINANCE College Station, IV 1 $50,000.00 Texas 2 -10 -72 MANAGER College Station, IV 1 $50,000.00 �, Texas i're • . ;it any amendment herein reduces the amount of additional indemnity on any Employee performing the duties of aa)• t tue liability of the Surety under the applicable Insuring Agreement with respect to any loss through acts or defaults of such Employee committed on or after the date set opposite the designation of such position or committed prior to the last mentioned date and discovered after the expiration of three years from such last mentioned date shall not exceed the amount set forth in paragraph numbered 2 hereof opposite the designation of such position; (b) in case any Employee, performing the duties of any position added to said Additional Indemnity Rider by this rider, has been previously covered under the applicable Insuring Agreement of the attached bond, liability on account of such Employee for acts or defaults committed during the period of such prior coverage, or during each of the periods of such prior coverages, if more than one, and during the period of the coverage added to said Additional Indemnity Rider by this rider, shall not be cumulative. FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND . ATTEST: t ' Se& a ary � BY • � �7 (id�..s.�..�... d e/V. President Countersigned ��jj( `--�- -r' —�� g ed by:_��!' �_ Authorized Representative Accepted • CITY OF COLTEGE STATIO P183-5M. 3 -68 177799 Changes in Additional Indemnity Rider —For use with Public Employees Blanket Bond and Public School System Employees Blanket Bond. to make changes in the additional indemnity rider. • Revised to May, 1958. (SR 5662) NOTE To increase or decrease the number of Employees or the amount of Additional Indemnity under the Additional Indemnity Rider insert the existing coverage in paragraph numbered 1 above and the new coverage in paragraph numberei 2 above. If no entry is to be made in paragraph numbered 2, insert the word "None" in the Position Column thereof. It G optional with the Surety to list on the reverse hereof a summary of all Additional Indemnity in force after the effective date of this rider including all of above amendments. (ovaa) • RIDER To be attached to P EMPLOYEES BLANKET BONO 4 �; 9 Bond No. ....._..., issued by FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, in favor of . ____............_.._.. ».. ».._.. CITY OF COLLEGE STi \TION COLLEGE ST'1TION, TEXAS and dated the 3 1 s t day of January . 19 71 In consideration of the premium charged for the attached bond, it is understood and agreed as follows: 1. Anything in the attached bond to the contrary notwithstanding, proof of loss shall be given in accordance with sub - section (a), as hereinafter set forth, and legal proceedings shall be commenced in accordance with sub - section (b), as hereinafter set forth: (a) Filing of Claim: Within 100 days after discovery of loss under said bond by the insured or, if a corporation, by any director thereof or by any officer thereof not in collusion with the person in default, the insured shall furnish to the_.._- ._..... n de r4 r it e r affirmative proof of Toss with full particulars in writing, including dates and items of loss, duly sworn to. (b) Filing of Suit: Legal proceedings for recovery of loss under said bond shall not be brought after the expiration of 28 months after the cause of action shall have accrued. 2. The attached bond shall be subject to all its terms, agreements, limitations and conditions except as herein expressly modified. 3. This rider shall become effective as of noon of the 3 1 5 t ._- —..day of January i9 71 Signed, sealed and dated this _. _ 1 St .__ of of January ., 19 71 • FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND ATTEST: al,novz BY C • Secretary President • Countersigned by. /t (-64. �- -- -� g Authorized Representative F4683 -2500. 5 -70 185425 Te :a• hider —For use with all forms (except Texas Forms Nos. 1 to 6 Inclusive) of Fidelity. Blanket Fidelity. Financial Institution or Forgery Bonds. Revised to March 1, 1946. Instructions— Conform to the wording of the attached bond by Inserting In each of the first two blank spaces In subdivision (a) of paragraph 1 the proper designation— "Insured," "Obligee." "Em- ployer" or "Assured " — whichever Is applicable. Insert In the third blank space In subdivision (a) of paragraph 1 the proper designation— "Surety." "Underwriter.' Company" OT "In- surer" whichever Is applicable. Revised to March 1. 1946. SR 5015 . NATI ONAL BANK C O L L E G E S T A T I O N . T E X A S • A F U L L S E R V I C E BANK • JOE R. SAWYER PRESIDENT March 14, 1972 Mr. Ran Boswell City Manager City of College Station College Station, Texas Re: EDA Project No. 08 -1 -00959 Waste Water Treatment Plang and Water System Improvements College Station, Texas Dear Mr. Boswell: Please accept this letter as our commitment to provide interim financing to the City of College Station, Texas, for the above numbered project. We understand that the amount of the loan will be 25 per cent of the project cost and agree to an annual percentage rate of 4 per cent. It is always a pleasure for this bank to be of service to you and our City. Yours very truly, Joe R. Sawyer President JRS /jt ON THE SIDE OF TEXAS A & "M THE CITY OF COLLEGE STAT1 >' 1 1 1101 TEXAS AVENUE • 77840 I 1 TEXAS • 1 4 March 13, 1972 Mr. Hugh M. Farmer, P. E. Chief, Technical Support Division Economic Development Administration 702 Colorado Street Austin, Texas 78701 Re: EDA Project No. 08 -1 -00959 Waste Water Treatment Plant and Water System Improvements College Station, Texas Dear Mr. Farmer: This is to advise you that the University National Bank of College Station, Texas, has agreed to provide interim financing for the above numbered pro- ject. The amount of the loan will be 25% of the project cost, with an annual percentage rate of 4 %. If any .other information is needed regarding this financing, please let us know. Sincerely, Ran Boswell City Manager City of College Station, Texas RB /nr fa, i ; H .. A (' ', i o U 7 ' r o no I 1 ■ 5 o 3i H .4-), 011 111111111111111111111 ': R • w o o W II I 1111111 1E11 O I O 9 11111111111 G Y a 17; ,,,. ! . o • 1 S to � 3 U ° . d fl k] J ! ! .. Ei o a o ; r ' r 9) r ^ fl ro j H +� ►—! T J o n Y � ____ _ di 111 ill 1 I W U 0 O -I I i v O r^ • ..9 D O o a x 0+3) r r r b ° . a d ¢ EOM _ 9 0 ` r'A 0 w 1 'In 3 sV1 V � c r i s � cd to N � 4 o F° — r' Y 7, Q v W H r r w W ,) a 1 ,U O ' a O U] •rI Q 0 .� .5._ O cir .I p g • • G cn,4 , .ctiiia.,,, 2 ;� ,_ . llIIIIIlIUlIIIIIIlIIIIII d u .. o i O _ ri ,,/` d • • W a— O ni c U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE FORM ED-117 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINI ION 5 -6 -66 BID FOR TAMP SUM CONTRACTS Place Col l pg# Sta ti nn , Texas Date 4 - '7 7%z Project No. 08 -1 -00959 Proposal of R . B. BUTLER INC (hereinafter called � "Bidder'')* a corporation, organized and existing under the laws of the the State of * a partnership, or an individual doing business as To the City of College Station, Texas (hereinafter called "Owner") Gentlemen: The Bidder, in compliance with your invitation for bids for the construction of a Contract A - Waste Treatment ,Pl.ant,ImnrovemprIts having examined the plans and specifications with related documents and the site of the proposed work, and being familiar with all of the conditions surrounding the construction of the proposed project including the availability of materials and labor, hereby proposes to furnish all labor, materials, and supplies, and to construct the project in accordance with the Contract Documents, within the time set forth therein, and at the prices stated below. These prices are to cover all expenses incurred in performing the work required under the Contract Documents, of which this proposal is a part. Bidder hereby agrees to commence work under'this contract on or before a date to be specified in written "Notice to Proceed" of the Owner and to fully complete the project within 300 consecutive calendar days thereafter as stipulated in the specifications. Bidder further agrees to pay as liquidated damages, the sum of $ 100.00 for each consecutive calendar day thereafter as hereinafter provided in Paragraph 19 of the General Conditions. Bidder acknowledges receipt of the following addendum: A/ / del /ec/ Fe G, // /?7Z cta 7 e c/ • * Insert corporation, partnership or individual as applicable. • US COMM -DC NOD{ -PS -2- BASE PROPOSAL: Bidder agrees to perform all of the Waste Treatment Plant Improvements work described in the specifications and shown on the plans for the sum of See attached sheets ($ ) (Amount shall be shown in both words and figures. In case of discrepancy, the amount shown in words will govern.) • ALTERNATE PROPOSALS: • Alternate No. 1: Deduct the suxn of. ($ ) UNIT PRICES For changing quantities of work items from those indicated by the contract drawings upon written instructions from the architect /engineer, the following unit prices shall prevail: 1. $, 2. $ 3. $ The above unit prices shall include all labor, materials, bailing, shoring, removal, overhead, profit, insurance, etc., to cover the finished work of the several kinds called for. Changes shall be processed in accordance with para- graph 17(a) of the General Conditions. Bidder understands that the Owner reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to waive any informalities in the bidding. The bidder agrees that this bid shall be good and may not be withdrawn for a period of XOCcalendar days after the scheduled closing time for receiving bids. 60 — days Upon receipt of written notice of the acceptance of this bid, Bidder will. execute the formal contract attached within 10 days and deliver a Surety Bond or Bonds as required by Paragraph 29 of the General Conditions. The bid security attached in the sum of is to become the property of the O:'ner in the e'ent the contract and bond are not executed within the time set forth, as liquidated damages for the delay and additional expense to the Omer caused thereby. Respectfully submitted: /7 By � �� ��� [.� . , ,4-e P L (SEAL - if bid is by a corporation) (Title) We C Pro S Lde' '1- Pie tI ei JGi (Business Address) '7'jBD C3 r y - a n r, K .� The undersigned Bidder proposes to perform and complete the said work. within the required time, and furnish all required quantities for the folic- "ina prices (Amount shall be shown in script form and figures; the script amount will govern) to wit: Item No. of Item and Unit Price (Fill Total No. Units Units in both Script and Figures) Amount PA.1 1 Lump Sum For furnishing all material, labor ^.rid equipment for the construction of Waste Treatment: Plant Improvements including all excavation, grading, structures, yard piping, equipment, pumps, motors, and electrical, all complete in place as shown on the plans and described herein, for the lump sum of ✓` i JC /CJNQ.�GU % -, /.0 7 i r i - c %Nt'(' " 7/1 Z.! s -477 Dollars /L,/n Cents ($ C E 5, 3 o c; . `=9, Per lump sum $ e, 3 ?icy', �c In accordance with Rule No. 9 of the State of Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, the estimated cost of materials to be used in the performance of this Contract which will be exempt from payment of sales tax is $ 4 ? -� �' r �' DEDUCTIVE ALTERNATE NO. 1 (LUMP SUM) For deducting from lump sum bid PA.1 the clarifier mechanism for the 85 foot diameter storm water clarifier, including the drive, access bridge, drive cage and collector arms, influent well center pier, and starter. The space for the starter shall remain in the cubicle. The inboard effluent trough located as shown on the drawings shall not be deleted. Furnish anchor bolts for future center pier and 30 inch 0.D. stub center pier up to elevation 236.0 fabricated from 3/16 inch steel plate. Deduct the lump sum amount of $ 1 :? (,. DEDUCTIVE ALTERNATE NO. 2 (LUMP SUM) For deducting from lump sum bid PA.1 the filter media all as specified and required by Section X18.2 Deduct the lump sum amount of $ 1 0 DEDUCTIVE ALTERNATE NO. 3 (LUMP SUM), For deducting from the lump sum bid PA. 1 the rotary distributor all as specified and required by Section X18.3 thru X18.9 inclusive Deduct the lump sum amount of $ 9 7 3 ) r • FORM ED -119 OMB No. 41 -R2433 (REV. 12 -711 Approval Expires August 31, 1973 II.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION CERTIFICATION OF BIDDER REGARDING EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY • GENERAL In accordance with Executive Order 11246 (30 F.R. 12319 -25), the implementing rules and regulations thereof, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, a Certification regarding Equal Opportunity is required of bidders or prospective contractors and their proposed subcontractors prior to the. award of contracts or subcontracts. CERTIFICATION OF BIDDER Bidder's Name R , B. BUTLER, INC. Address �a 3 �a /E) B ry Af7 z r P x Internal Revenue Service Employer Identification Number 1. Participation in a previous contract or subcontract. a. Bidder has participated in a previous contract or subcontract subject to the Equal Opportunity Clause [P Yes Q No b. Compliance reports were required to be filed in connection with such contract or subcontract Res n No c. Bidder has filed all compliance reports required by Executive Orders 10925, 11114, 11246 or by regulations of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights !` ct of 1964 . .. ... .. ... • j2es No d. If answer to item c is "No," please explain in detail on reverse side of this certification. 2. Dollar amount of bid $ 3. Anticipated performance period � days. 4. Expected total number of employees who will perform the proposed construction 5. Nonsegregated facilities a. Notice to Prospective Federally- Assisted Construction Contractors (1) A Certification of Nonsegregated Facilities, as required by the May 9, 1967, order (32 F.R. 7439, May 19, 1967) on Elimination of Segregated Facilities, by the Secretary of Labor, must be submitted to the recipient prior to the award of a federally- assisted construction contract exceeding $10,000 which is not exempt from the provisions of the Equal Opportunity clause. (2) Contractors receiving federally - assisted construction contract awards exceeding $10,000 which are not exempt from the provisions of the Equal Opportunity clause will be required to provide for the forv-nrding of the following notice to prospective subcontractors for supplies and construction contracts where the subcontracts exceed $10,000 and are not exempt from the provisions of the Equal Opportunity clause: USCOMM -DC 59880•P72 b. Notice to Prospective Subcontractors of Requirement for Certification of Nonsegregated Facilities (1) A Certification of Nonsegregated Facilities, as required by the May 9, 1967, order (32 F.R. 7439, May 19, 1967) on Elimination of Segregated Facilities, by the Secretary of Labor, must be submitted prior to the award of a subcontract exceeding $10,000 which is not exempt from the provisions of the Equal Opportunity clause. • (2) Contractors receiving subcontract awards exceeding $10,000 which are not exempt from the provisions of the Equal Opportunity clause will be required to provide for the forwarding of this notice to prospective subcontractors for supplies and construction contracts where the subcontracts exceed $10,000 and are not exempt from the provisions of the Equal Opportunity clause. c. Certification of Nonsegregated facilities The federally- assisted construction contractor certifies that he does not maintain or provide for his employees any segregated facilities at any of his establishments, and that he does not permit his employees to perform their services at any location, under his control, where segregated facilities are maintained. The federally - assisted construction contractor certifies further that he will not maintain or provide for his employees any segregated facilities at any of his establishments, and that he will not permit his employees to perform their services at any location, under his control, where segregated facilities are maintained. The federally - assisted construction contractor agrees that a breach of this certification is a violation of the Equal Oppor- tunity clause in this contract. As used in this certification, the term "segregated facilities" means any wait- ing rooms, work areas, rest rooms and wash rooms, restaurants and other eating areas, time clocks, locker rooms and other storage or dressing areas, parking lots, drinking fountains, recreation or entertainment areas, transportation, and housing facilities provided for employees which are segregated by explicit directive or are in fact segregated on the basis of race, creed, color, or national origin, because of habit, local custom, or otherwise. The federally - assisted construction contractor agrees that (except where he has obtained identical certifications from proposed subcontractors for specific time periods) he will obtain identical certifications in duplicate from proposed subcontractors prior to the award of subcontracts exceeding $10,000 which are not ex- empt from the provisions of the Equal Opportunity clause, and that he will retain the duplicate of such certifi- cations in his files. The contractor will include the original' in his Bid Package. 6. Race or ethnic group designation of bidder. Enter race or ethnic group in the appropriate box: [] Negro [] Spanish American [] Oriental [] American Indian [] Eskimo [] Aleut [lr White (other than Spanish American) REMARKS: Certification - The information above is true and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. 6 Lip Pi 7 ///1/ ! / 14; c c' es /chef -If' Name and title of signtt (Please type) rJ c �i em / , L€ e 4 -- - Signature Date NOTE: The penalty for making false statements in offers is prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 1001. u8COMM -OC 593110.P72 FORM ED•119 (REV. 12.71) FORM ED -121 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Budget Bureau Approval 12 -701 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION Not Requited RID BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we, the undersigned, R. B. Butler, Inc. as Principal, and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company as Surety , are hereby held and firmly bound unto City of Cp1 lAgp StAti nn, Te ri s as Owner in the penal sum of 5% of the Bid for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, we hereby jointly and severally bind our- selves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and. assigns. Signed, this 27th. day of April , 1972. The Condition of the above obligation is such that whereas the Principal has submitted to City of College Station, Texas a certain Bid, attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof to enter into a contract in writing, for the Contract A, waste treatment plant • NOW, THEREFORE, (a) If said Bid shall be rejected, or in the alternate, (b) If said Bid shall be accepted and the Principal shall execute and deliver a contract in the Form of Contract attached hereto (properly completed in accordance with said Bid) and shall furnish a bond for his faithful performance of said contract, and for the pay- ment of all persons performing labor or furnishing materials in connection therewith,and shall in all other respects perform the agreement created by the acceptance of said Bid, then this obligation shall be void, otherwise the same shall remain in force and effect; it being expressly understood and agreed that the liability of the Surety for any and all claims hereunder shall, in no event, exceed the penal amount of this obligation as herein stated. (More) USCOMM -DC 2e471.P70 (2) The Surety, for value received, hereby stipulated and agrees that the obligations of said Surety and its bond shall be in no way impaired or affected by any extension of the time within which the Owner may accept such Bid; and said Surety does hereby waive notice of any such extension. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Principal and the Surety have hereunto set their hands and seals, and such of them as are corporations have caused their corporate seals to be hereto affixed and these presents to be signed by their proper officers, the day and year first set forth above. R. B. BUTLER, INC. BY: ri v 74- -e ✓i: e i(- lenAL.S.) Principal ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE IfSURANC;F 0 PANY Surety By: ✓/�l� +� /� . rl�f .��� —sue �` ATTOR Y -IN -FACT GEORGE K. MALLARD IMPORTANT - Surety companies executing bonds must appear on the Treasury Department's most current list (Circular 570 as amended) and be authorized to transact business in the state where the project is located. FORM ED-121 (2.70) USCOMM•DC 28471•R70 �r+M '0.138 Budget Bureau No. 41 -R2479 is- 17 -s91 Approval Expires February 28, 1972 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION BID FOR UNIT PRICE CONTRACTS Place College Station, Texas Date Project No. 08 -1 -00959 W.B.F. CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. Proposal of (hereinafter called "Bidder "), organized and existing under the laws of the State of, 4./3./ doing business as C��'.� A *•' To the City of College Station, Texas (hereinafter called "Owner ") Gentlemen: The Bidder, in compliance with your invitation for bids for the construction of a Contract R - Water Lines having examined the plans and specifications with related documents and the site of the proposed work, and being familiar with all of the conditions surrounding the construction of the proposed project including the availability of materials and labor, hereby proposes to furnish all labor, materials, and supplies, and to construct the project in accordance with the contract documents, within the time set forth therein, and at the prices stated below. These prices are to cover all expenses incurred in performing the work required under the contract documents, of which this proposal is a part. Bidder hereby agrees to commence work under this contract on or before a date to be specified in written "Notice to Proceed" of the Owner and to fully complete the project within 180 consecutive calendar days thereafter as stipulated in the specifications. Bidder further agrees to pay as liquidated damages, the sum of $__60,(Q for each consecutive calendar day thereafter as hereinafter provided in Paragraph 19 of the General Conditions. Bidder acknowledges receipt of the following addendum: t.41-1 *Insert "a corporation ", "a partnership ", or "an individual" as applicable. u5COMM -DC 2 )eo5•PPG - 2 - Bidder agrees to perform all the Water Line work described in the specifications and shown on the plans, for the following unit prices: Item Est. Unit Price No. Qty. Description (Each) Total 1 See attached sheets Dollars and Dollars and Cents Cents ($ ) ($ ) 2 Dollars and Dollars and Cents Cents ($ ) ($ 3 Dollars and Dollars and Cents • Cents (� ) (8 ) TOTAL OF BID $ (Amounts are to be shown in both words and figures. In case of discrepancy, the amount shown in words will govern.) The above unit prices shall include all labor, materials, bailing, shoring, removal, overhead, profit, insurance, etc., to cover the finished work of the several kinds called for. Bidder understands that the Owner reserves the right to reject any or all bids. The bidder agrees that this bid shall be good and may not be withdrawn for a period of 30 cal- endar days after the scheduled closing time for receiving bids. Upon receipt of written notice of the acceptance of this bid, bidder will execute the formal con- tract attached within 10 days and deliver a Surety Bond or Bonds as requited tzy Paragra of_the, General Conditions. The bid security attached in the sum of jr' $ is to become the property of the Owner in the event the contract and bond are not executed within the time above set forth, as liquidated damages for the delay and additional expense to the Owner caused thereby. W.B.F. CONSTRUCTION CO., INC Respectfully submitted: P. O. Box 29070 DALLAS, TEXAS 7 24 By . %r/ (Title) (SEAL - if bid is by a corporation) (Business Address) FORM ED -116 (3- 17 -69) U$COMM•OC 200064P09 The undersigned Bidder proposes to perform and complete the said work within the required time, and furnish all required quantities for the following prices (Amount shall be shown in script form and figures; the script amount will govern) to wit: Item No. of Item and Unit Price (Fill Total No. Units Units in both Script and Figures) Amount P.B. 1 43944 L.F. For furnishing and installing eighteen (18 ") inch Class 200/1 Ductile Iron Pipe including trenching, bedding, backfill, water jetting, sterilizing, testing, 8 mil polyethelene wrap and final cleanup, complete in place, the sum of Dollars - �� _ Cents -=- ���� ($ // l� ), Per linear foot $ : _ , 4zc P.B. 2 $. L.F. For furnishing and installing twelve (12 ") inch Class 200/21 Cast Iron Pipe including trenching, bedding, backfill, water jetting, sterilizing, testing, 8 mil polyethelene wrap and final cleanup, complete in place, the sum of Dollars Cents �� a ($ / = ), Per linear foot $ P.B. 3 40 L.F. For furnishing and installing eight (8 ") inch Class 200/21 Cast Iron Pipe including trenching, bedding, backfill, water jetting, sterilizing, testing, 8 mil polyethelene wrap and final cleanup, complete in place, the sum of Dollars Cents C �h,_ . (I ) Per linear foot 7 !/ - PB-1 - Item No, of Item and Unit Price (Fill Total No, Units Units in both Script and Figures) Amount P.B. 4 : 3 Eaci Furnish and install 18 inch Gate Valve with mechanical joint or slip joint ends concrete slab and 5 foot diameter manhole, :� complete in place, the sum of ti l , d,, ' Y / - -,- ' . Dollars L�- ----- Cents b- ( . A,/ ,4�.�� ,':=), Per Each 5 (j, P.B. 5 .z Each Furnish and install 12 inch Gate Valve with mechanical joint or slip joint ends, and valve box, complete in place, the sum of ✓ '�'�, ,,. -� , ' - .- x r : ,( -- Dollars Cents / / el r ( l 7 `O ), Per Each $ � f 7 t l 4 P.B. 6 = Each Furnish and install 8 inch Gate Valve with mechanical joint or slip joint ends, and valve box, • complete in place, the sum of '"-1 , , Y..;. ._.../ 1 }:// Doll AA, Cents /0 ($ / 7 v.- f_2 ), Per Each $ 7 (3c% P.B. 7 7', Tons For furnishing and installing Cast Iron Fittings, complete in • place, the / -sum of . '`. - , 7 /1- /-i - r ! 1,,• f r ! Dollars . /1, Cents c7O /O ($ '' E" 0 �) Per Ton $ e l» n -- P.B. 8 , Each For furnishing and installing Fire Hydrant including special anchor pipes, 6 inch gate valve with valve bore' and drain gravel, complete in place, the sum of d —r �,— r. c 1�- �. � . i' -L Dollars /` 10 , _ Cents �/ 6 es I (0 2 0 C , Per Each ?1 ��� 3 n - PB-2 - I I • Item No. of Item and Unit Price (Fill Total No. Units Units in both Script and Figures) Amount P.B. 9 Each For completing Wet Connections as shown on the plans, the / sum of • -'1ic' =d` �r.;, jC'� r�V'' 7 � Dollars Cents 4 C ($ /17 J e', `'-= ), Per Each $ 72%.? • P.B. 10 70 L. F, ' For furnishing and installing • 30 inch reinforced Concrete Pipe Class IV in boring, complete in place, the sum of j' Dollars • A's, Cents n ($' ' '', ), Per linear foot $ 7 n P.B. 70 L.F. For furnishing and installing 30 inch reinforced Concrete Pipe • Class IV in open cut, complete in place, the sum of Dollars Cents a r, ( j 0- ), Per linear foot $ Z . 7'j P.B. 12 _40-. ea. Furnish and install Class C Concrete Encasement, complete in • place per table on appurtenance sheet, the sum of { Dollars . Cents v p ($ '.;)� Per cubic yard $ / R l �, PS-3 - Item No. of Item and Unit Price (Fill Total No. Units Units in both Script and Figures) Amount P.B. 13 300 C.Y, For furnishing and installing Class A gravel or crushed stone for Type 4 granular Embedment to stabilize ditch, complete in place, the sum of Aollars Cents C e ( 3 , o o ), Per cubic yard $ � ( Total Amount Bid - Proposal "B" Items P.B.1 thru P.B.13 incl. $ j ` In accordance with Rule 9 of State Comptroller of Public Accounts, the estimated cost of materials to be used in t contract which ,x.11 be exempt from the . payment of sales tax, is $ ��'' �Y /��.� zsnn, PB.4 ADDENDUM NO. 1 11 February, 1972 EDIT PROJECT NO. 06 -1- CO 59 CITY OF COLLF,GE STATION. TEXAS CONTRACT A - Waste Treatment Plant Improvements CONTRACT B - Water Lines Riewe & Wischmeyer, Inc. Dallas, Texas 1) Reference Specifications: Section X16.3 Flow Receiver Page X -39. Delete: reference to chart speed as weekly. Add: Chart speed shall be daily. 2) Reference Specifications: Form ED-116 Information for Bidders. Paragraph 1. Delete: reference to "withdraw bid within 30 days." Change to read: "No bidder may withdraw a bid within 60 days after the actual date of the opening thereof." 3) Reference Specifications: Form ED-118 Page 2 of Bid for Unit Price Contracts. Delete: reference to " 30 days for withdrawing bids." Change to read: "The bidder agrees that his bid shall be good and may not be withdrawn for a period of 60 calendar days after the scheduled closing time for receiving bids." 4) Reference Specifications: Section H Page H -2 paragraph H.6 Photographs. Delete: entire paragraph. 5) Reference Specifications: Section XX Electrical. add or equal to the following equipment paragraphs; 8.a, 13.g, 13.h, and 15.a. 6) Reference Proposal P.B.; the following changes and additions shall be made to the proposal as follows: Item No. P.B. 1 Delete: 160 L.F. of 18" D.I.P. making bid item read: 8140 L.F. P.B. 2 Add: 200 L.F. of 12" C.I.P. making bid item read: 6400 L.F. P.B. 5 Add: 1 Each 12" Gate Valve making bid item read: 5 Each. - A-1 - Item No. P.B. 6 Add: 2 Each 8" Gate Valves - making bid item read: 4 Each P.B. 7 Add: 3 Tons Fittings - making bid item read: 10 Tons P.B. 8 Delete: 1 Each Fire Hydrant - making bid item read: 10 Each P.B. 9 Add: 2 Each Wet Connections - making bid item read: 6 Each P.B. 12 Add: 35 C.Y. Concrete Encasement- making bid item read; 7; C.Y. P.B. 14 Add Bid Item P.B.14 as follows: 140 L.F. For furnishing and installing 21 inch reinforced Concrete Pipe, Class IV in boring, complete in place, the aam of ,;4. —el .-i- , -t- Dollars /10 Cents , 6 c ($ c% ), Per L.F. $ LJ-)0, Add DEDUCTIVE ALTERNATE NO. 1 For deducting 4260 L.F. of 12" C.I.P. in Waldo Road and F M Hwy 2154 the amount .i + ,f of , Per L. F. c. ( Total Amount $ ; 4S'. ) The Bidder shall acknowledge receipt of this Addendum No. 1 consisting of two (2) \ pages. Wi11 J. Wischmeyer, .E. - A-2 - • FORM ED -119 OMB No. 41 -R2433 (REV. 12.71) Approval Expires August 31, 1973 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION CERTIFICATION OF BIDDER REGARDING EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY GENERAL In accordance with Executive Order 11246 (30 F.R. 12319 -25), the implementing rules and regulations thereof, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, a Certification regarding Equal Opportunity is required of bidders or prospective contractors and their proposed subcontractors prior to the. award of contracts or subcontracts. CERTIFICATION OF BIDDER W.B.F. CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. Bidder's Name P. O. BOX 29070 Address DALLAS, TEXAS 75220 9 Internal Revenue Service Employer Identification Number 7 o^ - / r 71 7 8' 7 i . • 1. Participation in a previous contract or subcontract. a. Bidder has participated in a previous contract or subcontract subject to the Equal Opportunity Clause [] Yes L b. Compliance reports were required to be filed in connection with such contract or subcontract [] Yes Ei - 0 c. Bidder has filed all compliance reports required by Executive Orders 10925, 11114, 11246 or by regulations of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued "i I I pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights 1' of 1964. d. If answer to item c is ' i ,�Jo," please explain in detail on reverse side of this certification. I ll. / ( 2. Dollar amount of bid $ ill / O Q 3. Anticipated performance period / e' days. 4. Expected total number of employees who will perform the proposed construction / 5. Nonsegregated facilities a. Notice to Prospective Eederally- Assisted Construction Contractors (1) A Certification of Nonsegregated Facilities, as required by the May 9, 1967,. order (32 F.R. 7439, May 19, 1967) on Elimination of Segregated Facilities, by the Secretary of Labor, must be submitted to the recipient prior to the award of a federally- assisted construction contract exceeding $10,000 which is not exempt from the provisions of the Equal Opportunity clause. (2) Contractors receiving federally- assisted construction contract awards exceeding $10,000 which are not exempt from the provisions of the Equal Opportunity clause will be required to provide for the forwarding of the following notice to prospective subcontractors for supplies and construction contracts where the subcontracts exceed $10,000 and are not exempt from the provisions of the Equal Opportunity clause: USCOMM -DC 59380 -P72 b. Notice to Prospective Subcontractors of Requirement for Certification of Nonsegregated Facilities (1) A Certification of Nonsegregated Facilities, as required by the May 9, 1967, order (32 F.R. 7439, May 19, 1967) on T.:Iimination of Segregated Facilities, by the Secretary of Labor, must be submitted prior to the award of a subcontract exceeding $10,000 which is not exempt from the provisions of the Equal Opportunity clause. (2) Contractors receiving subcontract awards exceeding $10,000 which are not exempt from the provisions of the Equal Opportunity clause will be required to provide for the forwarding of this notice to prospective subcontractors for supplies and construction contracts where the subcontracts exceed $10,000 and are not exempt from the provisions of the Equal Opportunity clause. c. Certification of Nonsegregated facilities The federally- assisted construction contractor certifies that he does not maintain or provide for his employees any segregated facilities at any of his establishments, and that he does not permit his employees to perform their services at any location, under his control, where segregated facilities are maintained. The federally- assisted construction contractor certifies further that he will not maintain or provide for his employees any segregated facilities at any of his establishments, and that he will not permit his employees to perform their services at any location, under his control, where segregated facilities are maintained. The federally - assisted construction contractor agrees that a breach of this certification is a violation of the Equal Oppor- tunity clause in this contract. As used in this certification, the term "segregated facilities" means any wait- ing rooms, work areas, rest rooms and wash rooms, restaurants and other eating areas, time clocks, locker rooms and other storage or dressing areas, parking lots, drinking fountains, recreation or entertainment areas, transportation, and housing facilities provided for employees which are segregated by explicit directive or are in fact segregated on the basis of race, creed, color, or national origin, because of habit, local custom, or otherwise. The federally - assisted construction contractor agrees that (except where he has obtained identical certifications from proposed subcontractors for specific time periods) he will obtain identical certifications in duplicate from proposed subcontractors prior to the award of subcontracts exceeding $10,000 which are not ex- empt from the provisions of the Equal Opportunity clause, and that he will retain the duplicate of such certifi- cations in his files. The contractor will include the originar in his Bid Package. 6. Ruce oo ethnic group designation of bidder. Enter race or ethnic group in the appropriate box: [_'Negro [2'Spanish American [] Oriental [] American Indian [] Eskimo [] Aleut [iite (other than Spanish American) REMARKS: Certification - The information above is true and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. • W 0. F Name and title of signer (Please type) • ,' 7;1_7,71_1) / t77 - 7 02 Signature Date NOTE: The penalty for making false statements in offers is prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 1001. • FORM ED-119 (REV. 12•711 U3COMM•DC 692e0 -p72 FORM ED -121 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Budget Bureau Approval (2 -70) ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION Not Required BID BON!) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we, the undersigned, W. B. F. Construction Company, Inc. as Principal, end The Travelers Indemnity Company as Surety , are hereby held and firmly bound unto The City of College Station, Texzs as Owner in the penal sum of ---Five Percent (5 %) of the greatest amount bid in Dollars for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, we hereby jointly and severally bind our- selves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. Signed, this 27th day of April , 1 2 The Condition of the above obligation is such that whereas the Principal has submitted to The City of College Station, Texas a certain Bid, attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof to enter into a contract in writing, for the construction of Water Lines — Cont. B NOW, THEREFORE, (a) If said Bid shall be rejected, or in the alternate, (b) If said Bid shall be accepted and the Principal shall execute and deliver a contract in the Form of Contract attached hereto (properly completed in accordance with said Bid) and shall furnish a bond for his faithful performance of said contract, and for the pay- ment of all persons performing labor or furnishing materials in connection therewith,and shall in all other respects perform the agreement created by the acceptance of said Bid, then this obligation shall be void, otherwise the same shall remain in force and effect; it being expressly understood and agreed that the liability of the Surety for any and all claims hereunder shall, in no event, exceed the penal amount of this obligation as herein stated. (More) USCOMM -DC 26471 -P70 1 (2) The Surety, for value received, hereby stipulated and agrees that the obligations of said Surety and its bond shall be in no way impaired or affected by any extension of the time within which the Owner may accept such Bid; and said Surety does hereby waive notice of any such extension. LN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Principal and the Surety have hereunto set their hands and seals, and such of them as are corporations have caused their corporate seals to be hereto affixed and these presents to be signed by their proper officers, the day and year first set forth above. W. B. F. Construction Company, Inc.. by: , � . � ; f ' • - - t 1 . /� ✓• `' - ��J (A' - (L.S.) • Principal The Travelers Indemnity Company Surety By: Charles L. Shaw, III, Attorney — in — Fact IMPORTANT - Surety companies executing bonds must appear on the Treasury Department's most current list (Circular 570 as amended) and be authorized to transact business in the state where the project is located. FORM ED-(2) (2 -70) USCOMM•DC 28471 -P70 • GORDON FULCHER TEXAS � E QUALITY �iw BOARD JAMES U. CROSS CHAIRMAN I LESTER CLARK J. E. PEAVY, MD VICE - CHAIRMAN • 'ft ed' n � BYRON TUNNELL J. DOUG TOOLE � M > . HUGH C. YANTIS, JR. • HARRY P. BURLEIGH WWW EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR PH. 475-2651 A.C. 512 314 WEST 11TH STREET 78701 P.O. BOX 13246 CAPITOL STATION 78711 AUSTIN. TEXAS July 12, 1972 TO: Parties interested in the application of CITY OF COLLEGE STATION AMEND WASTE CONTROL ORDER NO. 10024 Gentlemen: The enclosed Hearing Commission Report will be presented to the Texas Water Quality Board at 9:00 a.m. on July 26, 1972 at the Sheraton Crest Inn, Madrid - Granada Rooms, 1st Floor, 111 East 1st Street, Austin, Texas. In order that the Board may render a final decision that takes into account review and research by the Board's staff, the Board will generally receive only testimony concerning matters that were presented at the hearing conducted by the Board's staff. Testimony will be admissible to point out deficiencies or omissions in the hearing report, statements made in clarification of the report findings, or changes which have occurred since the original hearing. The Board may, in its discretion, also permit oral arguments on issues not raised at the previous hearing, but persons who make requests to present new material should be prepared to show that the delay in bringing forward the new information was not their fault. We request that written exceptions and written requests to be heard at the Board Meeting be transmitted to the Board's staff at least three (3) ,days prior to the Board Meeting. If the request to speak or the written exceptions are in the nature of protest to the issuance of a waste control order, out of fairness to the applicant, the person making the protest should furnish a copy of it to the applicant at least three (3) days prior to the Board Meeting. Ver ly yours, cc. Office of the Attorney General 4 State Health Department Jai -- Showen, Director Air Control Board H- ings and Enforcement Texas Water Development Board Parks and Wildlife Department EIR:tt TWQB District No. 3 s • T HEARING COMMISSION REPORT SYNOPSIS • I. Applicant A. Name: City of College Station B. Address: P. O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77840 II. Discharge A. Volume: Not to exceed an average of 2,000,000 gallons per day. B. Type: Treated municipal sewage effluent. C. Course: Into Carters Creek, thence into the Navasota River, thence into the Brazos River. III. Hearing A. Date: May 31, 1972 B. Location: Austin, Texas C. Hearing Commission: J. Randel Hill, Presiding Officer Merton J. Coloton, Industrial Services D. Appearances: 1) Proponents: Mr. George R. Ford • Mr. Bennie H. Luedke Mr. William J. Wischmeyer 2) Opponents: None IV. Findi._nas A. The proposed additional sewage treatment facilities will provide improved treatment over that being provided by the presently overloaded system. B. As evidenced by approval of plans and specifications by the Texas State Department of Health, the proposed sewage treatment facilities are capable of conforming to the terms and conditions of the Proposed Waste Control Order. V. Recommendations A. Waste Control Order Granted: Yes B. Effective Date of Board Action: July 26, 1972 C. Status: Final approval SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE The City of College Station has applied for an amendment to its exist- ing waste control order for an average discharge of 2,000,000 gallons per day of treated domestic sewage from its proposed expanded munici- pal sewage treatment plant. The effluent will flow into Carters Creek and thence into the Navasota and Brazos Rivers. A public hear- ing concerning this application was held on May 31, 1972 in Austin, Texas. Mailed and published notice, both timely, preceded the hearing. • 1 r Hearing Commission Report City of College Station Page 2 In order to provide for expansion, the city proposes to add a contact stabilization type sewage treatment plant with a design flow capacity. of 1,500,000 gallons per day to its existing facility. The existing trickling filter plant has a 500,000 gallon per day design capacity. Plans and specifications for the project have been approved by the Texas State Department of Health, and federal funding will be pro- vided through the Economic Development Agency. The Texas Water Development Board and the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department have expressed no objection to the application, which has been unprotested. In view of the evidence, the Hearing Commission recommends that the Texas Water Quality Board grant final approval to the application for amendment to Waste Control Order No. 10024. EDR:tt J. andel Hill, Presiding Officer • Merton J. Coloton, Industrial Services July 6, 1972 • 1 PROPOSED WASTE CONTROL ORDER 41976 Page 1. Except as specified in the Special Provisions herein, this amend- . ment supersedes and replaces Page 1 (issued October 31, 1962) of Waste Control Order No. 10024. • NAME: City of College Station ADDRESS: P. 0. Box 9960 CITY: College Station, Texas 77840 TYPE OF WASTE CONTROL ORDER: Amendment to Waste Control Order No. 10024 NATURE OF BUSINESS PRODUCING WASTE: Municipal Sewerage System GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION OF WASTE DISPOSAL SYSTEM: Description: A sewage treatment plant consisting of lift station, bar screen, and grit chamber. The flow is split to a trickling filter plant and contact stabilization plant (design flows of 0.5 mgd and 1.5 mgd respectively). The trickling filter plant consists of lift station, two spiragesters in parallel, standard rate trickling filter, final clarifier, and sludge drying beds. The contact stabilization plant consists of aeration tanks, clarifier, aerobic digester, and sludge drying beds. The flows recombine and pass through a flow meter and chlorine detention tanks. The chlorine detention tank also receives excess storm flows for clarification and chlorination prior to discharge. Location: Located adjacent to Carters Creek approximately one (1) mile east of the City of College Station, Brazos County, Texas and as shown on the maps submitted with the application. CONDITIONS OF THE WASTE CONTROL ORDER: Character: Treated municipal sewage effluent Volume: Not to exceed an average of 2,000,000 gallons per day Not to exceed a maximum of 4,000,000 gallons per day Not to exceed a maximum of 3,500 gallons per minute Quality: NOT TO EXCEED Monthly 24 -hour Daily Individual Item Average Composite Sample B.O.D. 20 mg /1 25 mg /1 30 mg /1 Total Suspended Solids 20 mg /1 25 mg /1 30 mg /1 . A chlorine residual of not less than 1.0 mg /1 shall be maintained after at least a 20- minute detention time (based on peak flow). • • Proposed Waste Control Order - Page 2 City of College Station Point of Discharge: An outlet from a 30 inch pipeline into Carters Creek in Brazos County, Texas; thence to the Navasota River; thence to the Brazos River in the Brazos River Basin. • SPECIAL PROVISIONS: This order is granted subject to the policy of the Board to encourage the development of area -wide waste collection, treatment and disposal systems, The Board reserves the right to amend this order in accordance with applicable procedural requirements to require the system covered by this order to be integrated into an area -wide system, should such be developed; to require the delivery of the wastes authorized to be collected in, treated by or discharged from said system, to such area - wide system; or to amend this order in any other particular to effectuate the Board's policy, Such amendments may be made when, in the judgment of the Board, the changes required thereby are advisable for water quality control purposes and are feasible on the basis of waste treatment technology, engineering, financial, and related con- siderations existing at the time the changes are required, exclusive of the loss of investment in or revenues from any then existing or proposed waste collection, treatment or disposal system_ These public sewerage facilities shall be operated and maintained by a sewage plant operator holding a valid certificate of competency issued under the direction of the Texas State Health Department as required by Section 20 (a) of Article 4477 -1, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes, Operation and maintenance of the facilities described by this waste control order shall be in accordance with accepted practices for this type of waste treatment facility and shall include related maintenance such as painting, proper disposal of solid waste, and weed and grass cutting. The order holder shall comply with the provisions of Board Order No. 69- 1219 -1 relative to monitoring and reporting data on effluent described in "Conditions of the Waste Control Order ". The control order holder shall comply with the conditions of Page 1 of Waste Control Order No. 10024 (effective October 31, 1962) until the facilities described by this amendment have been completed. The estimated completion date for the facilities described by this waste control order is April 1, 1973. The order holder shall immediately notify the Austin office and the District office of the Board in writing upon completion of the facilities described by this waste control order. This waste control order becomes effective upon date of Board approval and is valid until amended, cancelled or revoked by the Board. MJC :sc . , ( II .'3$ 1 14,*%, • Nt. 4 iir- i ...,.... ....• • Nor -7--. e' \ 9�i / � � � \ \ n • DSO r ! . , , a 6. • , t 1 ', • \ ...tj „ \ ..t ' I AL . G Gj OP • : - r -i V i" 4. i': . "'. 7 ai ` ) :: ..../ .i. -4, r- , .\ :,:sr,...,,,,„,,, ,,,. ,..„ • 1'.; 4;41° WA E WA:E...R D . �' ' . TREATMENT � �� ' ., . ,..., • \—;/ /�w �. 1` •� �" ' V` \ ' • , , , p.....r.,2,. sr,,.0:),...,J • — 1 `� t � 1° � • ` \ • . i .J� / ` / ■ , . . k , . . , �� , ••,..4, ,. t ,, • . -.6- .. . ,-,- . .4, - - __:-. ; \,‘ // I / 4. t t C 3 fir - . � V A/ Z :11. 44.te / l ,..J , ..?? . , w ‘0 '-'-' P . A 11 '\ - 4' / . i ; .4. i ,..,„ 1 , t• 1 • .., c, ..... 1 . i • 0 ./1 I ...a? �� . = . ' i / • / � • I . i , s ' ..:( - '4: . / \ \‘‘ r . . • . rt . - -(/'"? Q. )," ,.......... - r w ,,�' y f • l e . ....." 1.$, by `�.. 7 4 i ; t r , t S ; • 4 \ /. -;...- I ? if .177.1„..\). . t :1 1 - I I /° • /- ',(,-,\ 11 • ,, 1 11 _,.. • I ■‘'.-....-Atie: • � q • .. ; 1R- I . • • �L•Y I'n 11.° � , • A. �.� 'S� 1 :28°'41( • • „:„..... N ., i . ..... .. , ,:h • ;� j ` `o e EXISTING TRUNK MAIN SEWS ° � , li-e."--;.--/-.. .‘ 44"."(1 '',.‘1 0 4) i • .......... - ' , .... ..._ \ I.) i : I August 17, 1972 Mr. Nicholas °v. Classen, P. E. Municipal Services 314 West 11th Street Austin, Texas 78701 Re: College Station, Texas WPC- Tex -1003 Dear Mr. Classen: In response to your letter to Mr. Ran Boswell, dated August 9, 1972, please see enclosed map, as per your request. If additional information is required, please let us know. Sincerely, George R. Ford City Engineer GRF/nr Enclosure cc: Ran Boswell ✓ Riewe & Vvischmeyer, Inc. Kiewe & Widcitme yer, HC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 8527 FERNDALE ROAD • DALLAS,TEXAS 75238 2141348 -3255 E. M. RIEWE W . WISCHMEYER 2 May, 1972 Mr. John Marino, Project Engineer Economic Development Administration 702 Colorado Street, Austin, Texas 78701 Re: EDA Project No. 08 -1 -00959 College Station, Texas Dear Mr. Marino: To support the proposed award of contracts for subject project we submit the following: 1) Proof of bidders' qualifications 2) Proof of Publication 3) Tabulation of bids with letter of recommendation from engineer 4) Proposal of low bidders Very truly yours, W. J. Wischmeyer, P.E. WJW /cj ENC: