The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02/20/2025 - Regular Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning Commission College Station, TX Meeting Agenda Planning and Zoning Commission 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, TX 77840 Internet: www.microsoft.com/microsoft-teams/join-a-meeting Meeting ID: 242 663 945 277 | Passcode: ov9Sa9Ed Phone: 833-240-7855 | Phone Conference ID: 960 422 366# The City Council may or may not attend this meeting. February 20, 2025 6:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers College Station, TX Page 1 Notice is hereby given that a quorum of the meeting body will be present in the physical location stated above where citizens may also attend in order to view a member(s) participating by videoconference call as allowed by 551.127, Texas Government Code. The City uses a third- party vendor to host the virtual portion of the meeting; if virtual access is unavailable, meeting access and participation will be in-person only. 1. Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request. 2. Hear Visitors At this time, the Chairperson will open the floor to visitors wishing to address the Commission on issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The visitor presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.) 3. Consent Agenda All matters listed under the Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. Since there will not be separate discussion of these items, citizens wishing to address the Commission regarding one or more items on the Consent Agenda may address the Commission at this time as well. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it may be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration. 3.1. Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes: Attachments: 1. February 6 2025 4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. 5. Regular Agenda 5.1. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding waiver requests to the Unified Development Ordinance Section 8.4.C.8.a, ‘Geometric Standards, Street Design Criteria’ and presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a Preliminary Plan for College Station West Subdivision on approximately 41.8 acres of land, generally located northeast of the Page 1 of 67 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 2 February 20, 2025 intersection of Jones Road and Raymond Stotzer Parkway in the city's Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. Case #PP2024-000014. Sponsors: Jeff Howell Attachments: 1. Staff Report 2. Waiver Request 3. Applicant's Supporting Information 4. Aerial and Small Area Map 5. Preliminary Plan 6. Informational Agenda 6.1. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a recap of the public engagement last November and December for the Active Transportation Master Plan. Sponsors: Jesse Dimeolo Attachments: 1. Memorandum 2. Community Vision Board 3. Online & In-Person Pedestrian Comments 4. Online & In-Person Bicycle Comments 6.2. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev 6.3. Presentation and discussion regarding an update on items heard: • A rezoning of approximately four acres of land located at 15305 FM 2154 from R Rural to WC Wellborn Commercial. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on January 16, 2025 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on February 13, 2025 and voted (7-0) to approve the request. • A rezoning of approximately 12 acres of land located at 2950 Rock Prairie Road West from R Rural to MU Mixed-Use. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on January 16, 2025 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on February 13, 2025 and voted (7-0) to approve the request. 6.4. Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: • Tuesday, February 18, 2025 ~ Northgate Small Area Plan Committee Meeting ~ 3:00 p.m. • Thursday, February 27, 2025 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 6:00 p.m. • Tuesday, March 4, 2025 ~ Northgate Small Area Plan Committee Meeting ~ 3:00 p.m. • Thursday, March 6, 2025 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, March 13, 2025 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 6:00 p.m. • Tuesday, March 18, 2025 ~ Northgate Small Area Plan Committee Meeting ~ 3:00 p.m. • Thursday, March 20, 2025 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m. 6.5. Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board and BioCorridor Board. • None Page 2 of 67 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 3 February 20, 2025 7.Discussion and possible action on future agenda items. A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 8.Adjourn. The Planning and Zoning Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on the agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion. I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the website and at College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on February 17, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters, readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations. Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun. "Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a Handgun that is Carried Openly." Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia. “Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.” Deputy City Secretary Page 3 of 67 February 6, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 8 Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting February 6, 2025 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairperson Jason Cornelius, Commissioners Aron Collins, Marcus Chaloupka, Warren Finch, David Higdon, Michael Buckley, and Tre Watson COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmember Melissa McIlhaney CITY STAFF PRESENT: Director of Planning & Development Services Anthony Armstrong, Assistant Director of Planning & Development Services Molly Hitchcock, Transportation Planning Coordinator Jason Schubert, Land Development Review Administrator Robin Macias, Senior Planner Jeff Howell, Staff Planner Garrett Segraves, Deputy City Attorney Leslie Whitten, Administrative Support Specialist Kristen Hejny, and Technology Services Specialist Roxanna Duran 1. Call Meeting to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request. Chairperson Cornelius called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 2. Hear Visitors No visitors spoke. 3. Consent Agenda 3.1 Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes. • January 16, 2025 Commissioner Chaloupka moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Commissioner Finch seconded the motion, the motion passed 7-0. 4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission Action. No items were removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. 5. Regular Agenda 5.1 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban to GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay on approximately 11.52 acres Page 4 of 67 February 6, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 8 being 33 lots within Glenhaven Estates Phase 2 Subdivision, save and except Glenhaven Drive, Fernhaven Circle, Francis Circle, and Springhaven Circle, generally located between Brazoswood Drive and Summerglen Drive. Case #REZ2024-000028 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the February 27, 2025 City Council meeting – Subject to change) Senior Planner Howell presented the rezoning to the Commission. Commissioner Collins asked for additional information on rental registration grandfathering, asking if a property that is not currently on the rental registration list, would have time to register the property prior to the Restricted Occupancy Overlay going into effect. Senior Planner Howell clarified that the rental registration would have to be in place prior to the Restricted Occupancy Overlay being adopted by City Council. Commissioner Chaloupka asked for the number of properties registered with the rental registration program in the proposed overlay boundary. Senior Planner Howell confirmed that there are currently three active rental registrations within the neighborhood. Commissioner Collins asked for additional information on the calls staff have received in opposition. Senior Planner Howell clarified that calls received in opposition expressed concerns that a restricted occupancy overlay is discriminatory toward students. Chairperson Cornelius asked if an unmarried couple with children are considered a family. Senior Planner Howell confirmed that would be considered a family under the definition of a family, identified through guardianship. Chairperson Cornelius asked for additional information on the neighborhood prevailing overlay. Senior Planner Howell clarified that the old zoning district overlay established in 2008, was used to preserve the neighborhood, identifying lot and open space standards. Mr. Howell confirmed that there are no longer neighborhood prevailing overlays in the code. Chairperson Cornelius asked why 13 signatures were not collected on the petition and asked if any of them are listed on the rental registration list. Senior Planner Howell deferred to the applicant. Page 5 of 67 February 6, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 8 Laurie Chapkin, Applicant/Committee President, Glenhaven Estates Phase 2, was available to answer questions from the Commission. Commissioner Higdon asked if the subdivision currently has a Homeowner’s Association (HOA). Ms. Chapkin confirmed that there is currently no HOA. Commissioner Finch asked why 13 signatures were not collected on the petition. Ms. Chapkin confirmed that four were non-resident owners of which, three are on the rental registration list, four declined signing the petition, and the committee was unable to reach five occupants. Commissioner Finch asked if the committee did a mail-out that would have included the five occupants that were unreachable. Ms. Chapkin confirmed that literature was attached to doors and notices were mailed to all homes. Chairperson Cornelius asked why four occupants declined signing the petition. Ms. Chapkin stated that they declined signing the petition citing concerns for property values, lack of knowledge of the Restricted Occupancy Overlay, and two gave no reason. Chairperson Cornelius opened the public hearing. David Belanger, Glenhaven Estates Phase 2, spoke in opposition the restricted occupancy overlay citing that he was one of the four who had concerns for discrimination toward students. Mary Morgan, Glenhaven Estates Phase 2, spoke in opposition to the restricted occupancy overlay citing concerns for discrimination toward students. Brian Ly, Glenhaven Estates Phase 2, spoke in opposition to the restricted occupancy overlay citing concerns for discrimination toward students. Chairperson Cornelius closed the public hearing. Commissioner Finch moved to recommend approval of the rezoning, Commissioner Chaloupka seconded the motion. Commissioner Buckley asked if the submitted application is complete. Page 6 of 67 February 6, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 8 Senior Planner Howell confirmed that the application was correct, and all criteria have been met. Commissioner Watson expressed support for the Restricted Occupancy Overlay. Commissioner Collins expressed general opposition for Restricted Occupancy Overlays but explained that this is a process available to the citizens set forth by the City Council, and the application meets all criteria. Commissioner Chaloupka asked for clarification on what would happen if a family did not have one of their children living in the home with other students, if they would be able to continue living there. Senior Planner Howell clarified that the Restricted Occupancy Overlay will limit properties to no more than two unrelated occupants and if the property is listed on the rental registration list they would be allowed to continue. Chairperson Cornelius expressed support for students and reiterated that all criteria for this Restricted Occupancy Overlay have been met. The motion passed 7-0. 5.2 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan - Future Land Use & Character Map from Estate Residential to Neighborhood Commercial for approximately 3.60 acres at 3768 McCullough Road, generally located northeast of the intersection of Wellborn Road and McCullough Road. Case #CPA2024-000004 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the February 27, 2025 City Council Meeting- Subject to change). Senior Planner Howell presented the comprehensive plan amendment to the Commission recommending approval. Commissioner Collins asked for the use of the property to the south. Senior Planner Howell confirmed that this property belongs to the Wellborn Baptist Church. Commissioner Collins asked if a church can go on an estate residential land use designated property. Senior Planner Howell confirmed that places of worship are allowed in any zoning district or land use designation. Commissioner Finch asked for the nature of the call in opposition. Page 7 of 67 February 6, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 8 Senior Planner Howell stated that callers in opposition cited concerns for not being notified of the comprehensive plan change and expressed a desire to keep Wellborn rural. Commissioner Finch asked if the applicant wants to use the property for a storage facility. Senior Planner Howell confirmed that the applicant would like to rezone the property in the future to expand the storage facility. Commissioner Chaloupka stated that this is a land locked property, asking if additional access will be added. Senior Planner Howell clarified that both this property and the adjacent property would have to be subdivided. Commissioner Higdon asked if staff received any objections from adjacent property owners. Senior Planner Howell confirmed that there were no objections. Glenn Jones, Applicant, J4 Engineering, was available for questions from the Commission. Chairperson Cornelius opened the public hearing. Mike McCleary, 3649 Barron Cut-Off Road, spoke in opposition of the comprehensive plan amendment citing concerns with a storage facility fitting into a rural community. Commissioner Higdon asked if access to this property will go through Mr. McCleary’s property. Mr. McCleary clarified that currently the church parking lot backs up to this lot and is unaware if access will be granted from Wellborn Road. Tom Marty, Estates of Royder Ridge, spoke in favor of the comprehensive plan amendment and provided the Commission information on access to the property. Commissioner Collins asked for clarification that this item is for a comprehensive plan amendment only. Senior Planner Howell confirmed that this item is for a comprehensive plan amendment. Chairperson Cornelius asked if the property is being sold to the same owner as the adjacent property. Senior Planner Howell confirmed that it is staff’s understanding that the property is being sold to the same owner. Page 8 of 67 February 6, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 8 Commissioner Higdon asked about the notification process for the public hearing. Senior Planner Howell clarified that all property owners within 200 feet of the property were notified. Chairperson Cornelius closed the public hearing. Commissioner Chaloupka asked if the Texas Department of Transportation has granted access to the property from Wellborn Road (FM 2154). Senior Planner Howell clarified that access would be coordinated as part of the site plan for the adjacent property zoned PDD Planned Development District. Director Armstrong further clarified that the existing driveway was approved with the current concept plan as an access point, there is no change in access point. Commissioner Collins moved to recommend approval of the comprehensive plan amendment, Commissioner Buckley seconded the motion, the motion passed 7-0. 5.3 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from R-4 Multi-Family to GC General Commercial on approximately 2.3 acres generally located at 810 Southwest Parkway East. Case #REZ2024-000029 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the February 27, 2025 City Council Meeting – Subject to change). Staff Planner Segraves presented the rezoning to the Commission recommending approval. Chairperson Cornelius asked for clarification on why a place of worship is zoned as R-4 Multi-Family. Staff Planner Segraves clarified that places of worship are allowed in any zoning district. Deven Doyen, Applicant, Schultz Engineering, was available to address and answer questions from the Commission. Chairperson Cornelius opened the public hearing. No visitors spoke. Chairperson Cornelius closed the public hearing. Page 9 of 67 February 6, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 8 Commissioner Collins asked if staff received any calls of opposition to the rezoning. Staff Planner Segraves confirmed that no calls of opposition were received by staff. Commissioner Finch moved to recommend approval of the rezoning Commissioner Chaloupka seconded the motion, the motion passed 7-0. 6. Informational Agenda 6.1 Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev There was no discussion. 6.2 Presentation and discussion regarding an update on items heard: • A comprehensive plan amendment for approximately 1.047 acres of land located at 3423 Cain Road and 3197 Holleman Drive South from Mixed Residential to General Commercial. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on January 16, 2025 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on January 23, 2025 and voted (7-0) to approve the request. • A rezoning of approximately 3.3 acres of land located at 3417 and 3423 Cain Road and 3197 Holleman Drive South from R Rural and T Townhouse to T Townhouse and GC General Commercial. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on January 16, 2025 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on January 23, 2025 and voted (7-0) to approve the request. • A recommendation for appointments to the Comprehensive Plan Evaluation Committee and the BioCorridor Board. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on January 16, 2025 and voted (6-0) to recommend Commissioners Buckley, Watson, and Finch as appointees to the Comprehensive Plan Evaluation Committee, and Commissioners Collins and Higdon as appointees to the BioCorridor Board. The City Council heard this item on January 23, 2025 and voted (7-0) to approve the recommendations. There was no discussion. 6.3 Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: • Thursday, February 13, 2025 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, February 20, 2025 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, February 27, 2025 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 6:00 p.m. Page 10 of 67 February 6, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 8 of 8 • Thursday, March 6, 2025 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m. There was no discussion. 6.4 Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board and BioCorridor Board. • None There was no discussion. 7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items. Commissioner Chaloupka asked for an update on shared housing and student housing. Director Armstrong stated that the City’s Community Service Department is preparing that information as part of a presentation to the City Council, information will be passed to the Commission as well. Chairperson Cornelius asked for High Occupancy and Restricted Occupancy Overlays to be mapped on the City’s website. Director Armstrong stated an update on maps with overlays will be performed with the existing conditions update and the Comprehensive Plan 5-year Update. 8. Adjourn The meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m. Approved: Attest: __________________________________ _________________________________ Jason Cornelius, Chairperson Kristen Hejny, Board Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services Page 11 of 67 Planning & Zoning Commission February 20, 2025 Scale Three residential (multifamily) lots, one commercial lot and common areas on approximately 41.8 acres of land Location Generally located east of the intersection of Jones Road and Raymond Stotzer Parkway, on the south side of Raymond Stotzer Parkway in the city’s extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ). Applicant Lexie England (Kimley-Horn) Project Manager Jeff Howell, Senior Planner jhowell@cstx.gov Project Overview The original preliminary plan was approved in May 2023. This revised preliminary plan includes the reduction of the number of lots, the creation of two common areas, and updated cross-sections for the private streets within the development. Waivers are being requested for right-of way width, as well as the updated cross-section for rural residential street standards. Since the original waivers included specific details of the cross-sections, that is the reason the waivers are requested again in order to update the information. The preliminary plan layout shows three privately maintained roadways (50’ R.O.W) to be projected off the extension of Health Science Center Parkway. Towards the middle of the development, Scott Street is proposed to have a reduced right-of-way width (50’) with 33’ of pavement, which includes on-street parking on one side, and a raised curb and gutter and a 5’ sidewalks on both sides. Mandy Lane towards the bottom of the development is proposed to have a reduced right-of-way width (50’) with 24’ of pavement, no shoulder or open ditches and sloped towards the center of the road. Robin Road at the end of the development is also proposed to have a reduced right-of-way width (50’) with 24’ of pavement, no shoulder or open ditches, and sloped to one side. Therefore, the applicant is requesting modifications to both requirements for each roadway, which are to be privately maintained. Several waivers are requested to amend street standards found in UDO Section 8.4. In all, six subdivision regulation Preliminary Plan for College Station West PP2024-000014 Page 12 of 67 Planning & Zoning Commission February 20, 2025 waivers are being requested to develop the multifamily community. Parkland Dedication Parkland dedication fees will be paid prior to recording of the final plat at a rate of $3,154 per residential lot. Traffic Impact Analysis A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was not required. Compliant with Comprehensive Plan (including Master Plans) and Unified Development Ordinance The preliminary plan is not compliant with the newly updated Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map, however this property is located outside of the City limits in the extra-territorial jurisdiction where the City has no land use authority. Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes, with the exception of six waiver requests previously approved in 2023 and the new updated requests: the first three related to the rural residential street standards regarding right-of-way width in UDO Section 8.4.C.8.a Geometric Standards, Street Design Criteria requirements, which were already approved as part of the previous Preliminary Plan (50’ width). The last three waivers related to the updated details of the cross-section of the rural residential street standards found in the 2020 B/CS Unified Design Guidelines for the same roadways. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the waivers and the Preliminary Plan. Supporting Materials 1. Waiver Request 2. Applicants Supporting Information 3. Aerial and Small Area Map 4. Preliminary Plan Page 13 of 67 SUBDIVISION WAIVER REQUESTS The proposed Preliminary Plan is in compliance with the applicable Subdivision Regulations contained in the UDO except for the following waiver requests: UDO Section 8.4.C.8.a ‘Geometric Standards, Street Design Criteria’ - Per the requirements of this section, right-of-way width for the rural residential street should be 70’. As shown in the attached waiver requests, the first waiver requests are for right- of-way width for Scott Street, Mandy Lane, and Robin Road along the extension of Health Science Center Parkway. This request is to reduce the right-of-way width to 50’. This is below the requirement by 20 feet. While this was previously approved, due to the updated cross-sections, the waiver to the width is being requested again. The applicant is requesting these waivers as their intention is to increase the developable area, accommodate privately maintained roadways, and provide pedestrian access for multifamily communities. Page 14 of 67 UDO Section 8.4.C.8.a ‘Geometric Standards, Street Design Criteria’ -Per the requirements of UDO Section 8.4.C.8, streets shall be constructed to the rural residential standard. As indicated in the 2020 B/CS Unified Design Guidelines, rural residential streets are to have 24’ of pavement width with a 2’ shoulder (ribbon curb) and no sidewalks on either side. As shown in the attached waiver requests, the next waiver requests are for the cross-section for, Scott Street, Mandy Lane, and Robin Road connecting to the extension of Health Science Center Parkway. Scott Street is proposed to have 33’ of pavement width, which includes 24’ of pavement for drive lanes, 8’ parallel parking, 0.5’ pavement to include a curb (raised) and gutter, and a 5’ sidewalk on both sides. This is meeting the 24’ pavement width requirement, however a raised curb, gutter, on-street parking and sidewalks (urban street design elements) are proposed. Page 15 of 67 Mandy Lane is proposed to have with 24’ of pavement with no shoulder or open ditch, with the roadway sloped toward the center. This is below the pavement requirement by 3 feet and provides no shoulder or ditch. Page 16 of 67 Robin Road is proposed to have with 24’ of pavement with no shoulder or open ditch, with the roadway sloped to one side. This is below the pavement requirement by 3 feet and provides no shoulder or ditch. The applicant is requesting these waivers as their intention is to provide pedestrian access for a multifamily community, while providing right-of-of way to meet block length requirements. The applicant states that they are to construct a non-standard, privately maintained road section with curb, gutter, and sidewalks to provide desired frontage for residents of future multifamily communities and amenities (Scott St.). Also, that in the case of the minimal roadway sections, Mandy Ln. is to provide secondary access and fire access to the multifamily development as well as a future connection to Welcome Ln., while Robin Rd. is not an access road for residents and is intended for maintenance. Page 17 of 67 In accordance with the Subdivision Regulations, when considering a waiver, the Planning and Zoning Commission should make the following findings to approve the waiver: 1) That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; As this property is located in the extraterritorial jurisdiction, the right-of-way is being dedicated to Brazos County in order to meet the block length requirements. To increase the amount of developable area for future residents, the applicant is proposing modified roadway width, along with a modified cross-sections (which includes sidewalk, curb and gutter, and on-street parking) that is more desirable for the proposed multifamily development. While sidewalks are not included and these other items shown in the proposed cross-sections are not the standard sections of the rural residential street, Brazos County has determined the privately maintained roadway sections are acceptable and have reviewed the Preliminary Plan as well. 2) That the waivers are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; If the waivers are not granted, the subject property can still be subdivided. However, the applicant has stated that granting the waivers are necessary for the increase in developable area, as well as to make offer a better experience, more parking and access for future residents and guests of the multifamily communities. They have indicated that the Mandy Lane proposed road section will offer a better experience to future residents. They have also indicated that the other modified cross-section (Robin Rd.) will help signal that this particular roadways is not to be used as a access drive for residents. 3) The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering this chapter; and The granting of these waivers would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare of other properties in the area as this development will comply with all other standards and requirements found in the subdivision standards of the Unified Development Ordinance as they apply to properties in the extraterritorial jurisdiction. The applicant has stated that the roadways will still meet the functional requirements of the rural residential street standard ((drainage, lane widths, pavement design), while also providing a sidewalk on those specific streets for future residents. Since the roadways being privately maintained, there is also no cost burden to the City or County for the modified sections. Based on the 2020 B/CS Unified Design Guidelines, the proposed streets in which waivers are being requested are more closely aligned with those standards for typical urban streets found within the City limits, particularly for Residential and Neo-Traditional Design (NTD) Residential streets. Page 18 of 67 4) That the granting of the waivers will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. These waivers will not have a negative effect on the orderly subdivision of land in the area. The right-of-way for these modified streets is being provided in order to meet the block length requirements, which provides for future connection to adjacent un-platted properties to the north and south of the subject property. Page 19 of 67 Page 1 of 2 PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION SUPPORTING INFORMATION Name of Project: SUBDIVISION FOR A PROPOSED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT Address: Applicant:: Lexie England Property Owner: LIGHTSEY THOMAS WHITT ETAL Legal Description: A014400, J H JONES (OCL), TRACT 4, 18.7 ACRES Total Acreage: 41.83 Total No. of Lots: 5 ROW Acreage: 6.83 Floodplain Acreage: 0.00 Number of requested waiver(s) to subdivision regulations, if applicable: Requested waiver(s) to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable): Regarding the waiver request, explain the following: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. 2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantional property right of the applicant. Page 20 of 67 Page 2 of 2 3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. 4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable): Detailed explanation of condition identified above: Requested Oversize Participation: Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat, if applicable: Parkland Development Fee: No. of acres to be dedicated: No. of acres in floodplain: No. of acres in detention: No. of acres in greenways: Parks & Recreation Advisory Board approval date: Page 21 of 67 Page 1 of 2 PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION SUPPORTING INFORMATION Name of Project: SUBDIVISION FOR A PROPOSED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT Address: Applicant:: Lexie England Property Owner: LIGHTSEY THOMAS WHITT ETAL Legal Description: A014400, J H JONES (OCL), TRACT 4, 18.7 ACRES Total Acreage: 41.83 Total No. of Lots: 5 ROW Acreage: 6.83 Floodplain Acreage: 0.00 Number of requested waiver(s) to subdivision regulations, if applicable: Requested waiver(s) to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable): Regarding the waiver request, explain the following: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. 2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantional property right of the applicant. Page 22 of 67 Page 2 of 2 3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. 4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable): Detailed explanation of condition identified above: Requested Oversize Participation: Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat, if applicable: Parkland Development Fee: No. of acres to be dedicated: No. of acres in floodplain: No. of acres in detention: No. of acres in greenways: Parks & Recreation Advisory Board approval date: Page 23 of 67 Page 1 of 2 PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION SUPPORTING INFORMATION Name of Project: SUBDIVISION FOR A PROPOSED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT Address: Applicant:: Lexie England Property Owner: LIGHTSEY THOMAS WHITT ETAL Legal Description: A014400, J H JONES (OCL), TRACT 4, 18.7 ACRES Total Acreage: 41.83 Total No. of Lots: 5 ROW Acreage: 6.83 Floodplain Acreage: 0.00 Number of requested waiver(s) to subdivision regulations, if applicable: Requested waiver(s) to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable): Regarding the waiver request, explain the following: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. 2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantional property right of the applicant. Page 24 of 67 Page 2 of 2 3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. 4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable): Detailed explanation of condition identified above: Requested Oversize Participation: Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat, if applicable: Parkland Development Fee: No. of acres to be dedicated: No. of acres in floodplain: No. of acres in detention: No. of acres in greenways: Parks & Recreation Advisory Board approval date: Page 25 of 67 Page 1 of 2 PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION SUPPORTING INFORMATION Name of Project: SUBDIVISION FOR A PROPOSED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT Address: Applicant:: Lexie England Property Owner: LIGHTSEY THOMAS WHITT ETAL Legal Description: A014400, J H JONES (OCL), TRACT 4, 18.7 ACRES Total Acreage: 41.83 Total No. of Lots: 5 ROW Acreage: 6.83 Floodplain Acreage: 0.00 Number of requested waiver(s) to subdivision regulations, if applicable: Requested waiver(s) to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable): Regarding the waiver request, explain the following: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. 2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantional property right of the applicant. Page 26 of 67 Page 2 of 2 3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. 4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable): Detailed explanation of condition identified above: Requested Oversize Participation: Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat, if applicable: Parkland Development Fee: No. of acres to be dedicated: No. of acres in floodplain: No. of acres in detention: No. of acres in greenways: Parks & Recreation Advisory Board approval date: Page 27 of 67 Page 1 of 2 PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION SUPPORTING INFORMATION Name of Project: SUBDIVISION FOR A PROPOSED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT Address: Applicant:: Lexie England Property Owner: LIGHTSEY THOMAS WHITT ETAL Legal Description: A014400, J H JONES (OCL), TRACT 4, 18.7 ACRES Total Acreage: 41.83 Total No. of Lots: 5 ROW Acreage: 6.83 Floodplain Acreage: 0.00 Number of requested waiver(s) to subdivision regulations, if applicable: Requested waiver(s) to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable): Regarding the waiver request, explain the following: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. 2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantional property right of the applicant. Page 28 of 67 Page 2 of 2 3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. 4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable): Detailed explanation of condition identified above: Requested Oversize Participation: Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat, if applicable: Parkland Development Fee: No. of acres to be dedicated: No. of acres in floodplain: No. of acres in detention: No. of acres in greenways: Parks & Recreation Advisory Board approval date: Page 29 of 67 Page 1 of 2 PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION SUPPORTING INFORMATION Name of Project: SUBDIVISION FOR A PROPOSED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT Address: Applicant:: Lexie England Property Owner: LIGHTSEY THOMAS WHITT ETAL Legal Description: A014400, J H JONES (OCL), TRACT 4, 18.7 ACRES Total Acreage: 41.83 Total No. of Lots: 5 ROW Acreage: 6.83 Floodplain Acreage: 0.00 Number of requested waiver(s) to subdivision regulations, if applicable: Requested waiver(s) to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable): Regarding the waiver request, explain the following: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. 2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantional property right of the applicant. Page 30 of 67 Page 2 of 2 3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. 4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable): Detailed explanation of condition identified above: Requested Oversize Participation: Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat, if applicable: Parkland Development Fee: No. of acres to be dedicated: No. of acres in floodplain: No. of acres in detention: No. of acres in greenways: Parks & Recreation Advisory Board approval date: Page 31 of 67 Page 32 of 67 Page 33 of 67 WELCOME LN(60' ROW)RAYMOND STOTZER PKWY - FM 60(ROW VARIES)RAYMOND STOTZER PKWY - FM 60 COLLEGE STATION WEST BRAZOS COUNTY, TX ©PP-Not for construction or permit purposes. FOR REVIEW ONLY Engineer P.E. No.Date Lexie England 139395 1/28/2025 NOR THPROPERTY LINEEXISTING CONTOUREXISTING EASEMENTPROPOSED EASEMENTEXISTING ROADWAYLEGEND500VICINITY MAPSCALE: 1"=3,000'NORTH1PRELIMINARY PLAN - NOT FOR RECORDNOTES:1.DUE TO THIS PROJECT'S LOCATION WITH THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION ETJ, THERE ARE NOAPPLICABLE BUILDING SETBACKS. THERE ARE NO ADJACENT LOTS WITH ZONING DESIGNATIONS.AMENDED PRELIMINARY PLANFORCOLLEGE STATION WEST41.83 ACRE TRACTBEING ALL OF A CALLED 22.172 ACRE TRACTCONVEYED IN VOLUME 3379, PAGE 21 OPRBCT,THE REMAINDER OF FIVE TRACTS OF LANDCONVEYED IN VOLUME 11072, PAGE 263 OPRBCT,AND THE REMAINDER OF A CALLED 2 ACRE TRACTCONVEYED IN VOLUME 11072, PAGE 266 OPRBCTJOHN H. JONES SURVEY, ABSTRACT 144BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS4 PROPOSED LOTS & COMMON AREAS 1 & 2JANUARY 2025PROPERTY OWNER/DEVELOPERTB COLLEGE STATION DEV, LLC6001-2 W WILLIAM CANNON DRSTE 101AUSTIN, TX 78749PH: (512) 800-4534CONTACT: AARON LEVYSURVEYORKERR SURVEYING409 N TEXAS AVEBRYAN, TX 77803PH: (979) 268-3195CONTACT: NATHAN KERR, R.P.L.S.PRELIMINARY PLAN 1ENGINEERKIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES6800 BURLESON ROADBUILDING 312, SUITE 150AUSTIN, TX 78744PH: (512) 646-2237CONTACT: LEXIE ENGLAND, P.E.Page 34 of 67 WELCOME LN(60' ROW)RAYMOND STOTZER PKWY - FM 60(ROW VARIES)RAYMOND STOTZER PKWY - FM 60 OHE OHE OHE OHE &O//E*E 6T$T,ON:E6T %R$=O6&O8NT<T; 33NRWIRUFRQVWUXFWLRQRUSHUPLWSXUSRVHV )ORRE9,E:ON/< EQJLQHHU 3ENR'DWH /H[LHEQJODQG 5 05 NOR TH3RO3ERT</,NEE;,6T,N*&ONTO8RE;,6T,N*E$6E0ENT3RO3O6E'E$6E0ENTE;,6T,N*RO$':$<RE6,'ENT,$//OT&O00ER&,$//OT$0EN,T,E6/OTO3EN63$&E'ETENT,ON'R$,N$*E/OT3R,9$TE/<0$,NT$,NE'RO$'/E*EN'5003RE/,0,N$R< /$N'86E3/$N3RE/,0,N$R<3/$NNOT)ORRE&OR'&O//E*E6T$T,ON:E6T/$N'86E6800$R<&$TE*OR<3RE/,0,N$R<3/$N$&RE$*E3ER&ENT$*EO)TOT$/$RE$RE6,'ENT,$//OT6&O00ER&,$//OT50&O00ON$RE$&O00ON$RE$ 'R$,N$*EE$6E0ENTR,*HTO):$<0TOT$/0000$0EN'E'3RE/,0,N$R<3/$N)OR&O//E*E6T$T,ON:E6T$&RETR$&T%E,N*$//O)$&$//E'$&RETR$&T&ON9E<E',N9O/80E3$*EO3R%&TTHERE0$,N'ERO)),9ETR$&T6O)/$N'&ON9E<E',N9O/80E03$*EO3R%&T$N'THERE0$,N'ERO)$&$//E'$&RETR$&T&ON9E<E',N9O/80E03$*EO3R%&T-OHNH-ONE668R9E<$%6TR$&T%R$=O6&O8NT<TE;$63RO3O6E'/OT6 &O00ON$RE$6 -$N8$R<053RO3ERT<O:NER'E9E/O3ERT%&O//E*E6T$T,ON'E9//&00::,//,$0&$NNON'R6TE0$86T,NT;3H5005&ONT$&T$$RON/E9<68R9E<OR.ERR68R9E<,N*0NTE;$6$9E%R<$NT;03H5&ONT$&TN$TH$N.ERRR3/6EN*,NEER.,0/E<HORN $66O&,$TE600%8R/E6ONRO$'%8,/',N*68,TE50$86T,NT;3H5&ONT$&T/E;,EEN*/$N'3ENOTE6'8ETOTH,63RO-E&T 6/O&$T,ON:,THTHE&,T<O)&O//E*E6T$T,ONET-THERE$RENO$33/,&$%/E%8,/',N*6ET%$&.6THERE$RENO$'-$&ENT/OT6:,TH=ON,N*'E6,*N$T,ON6&O00ON$RE$ 'R$,N$*E/OT,6RE6ER9E')OR'R$,N$*E'ETENT,ON$N'&ON9E<$N&EPage 35 of 67 WELCOME LN(60' ROW)RAYMOND STOTZER PKWY - FM 60(ROW VARIES)WHITE CREEK RDWHITE CREEK RDRAYMOND STOTZER PKWY - FM 60(ROW VARIES)RIVER RDOHE OHE OHE OHE &O//E*E 6T$T,ON:E6T %R$=O6&O8NT<T; 33NRWIRUFRQVWUXFWLRQRUSHUPLWSXUSRVHV )ORRE9,E:ON/< EQJLQHHU 3ENR'DWH /H[LHEQJODQG 5 05 NOR TH3RO3ERT</,NEE;,6T,N*&ONTO8RE;,6T,N*E$6E0ENT3RO3O6E'E$6E0ENTE;,6T,N*RO$':$<E;,6T,N*:$TER/,NE3RO3O6E'38%/,&:$TER/,NE3RO3O6E'3R,9$TE:$TER/,NEE;,6T,N*:$6TE:$TER/,NE3RO3O6E'3R,9$TE:$6TE:$TER/,NE3RO3O6E'::0$NHO/E3RO3O6E'6TOR0/,NE3RO3O6E'HE$':$///E*EN'5003RE/,0,N$R<3/$NNOT)ORRE&OR'$0EN'E'3RE/,0,N$R<3/$N)OR&O//E*E6T$T,ON:E6T$&RETR$&T%E,N*$//O)$&$//E'$&RETR$&T&ON9E<E',N9O/80E3$*EO3R%&TTHERE0$,N'ERO)),9ETR$&T6O)/$N'&ON9E<E',N9O/80E03$*EO3R%&T$N'THERE0$,N'ERO)$&$//E'$&RETR$&T&ON9E<E',N9O/80E03$*EO3R%&T-OHNH-ONE668R9E<$%6TR$&T%R$=O6&O8NT<TE;$63RO3O6E'/OT6 &O00ON$RE$6 -$N8$R<053RO3ERT<O:NER'E9E/O3ERT%&O//E*E6T$T,ON'E9//&00::,//,$0&$NNON'R6TE0$86T,NT;3H5005&ONT$&T$$RON/E9<68R9E<OR.ERR68R9E<,N*0NTE;$6$9E%R<$NT;03H5&ONT$&TN$TH$N.ERRR3/63RE/,0,N$R< 8T,/,T<3/$NEN*,NEER.,0/E<HORN $66O&,$TE600%8R/E6ONRO$'%8,/',N*68,TE50$86T,NT;3H5&ONT$&T/E;,EEN*/$N'3EPage 36 of 67 COLLEGE STATION WEST BRAZOS COUNTY, TX ©PP-Not for construction or permit purposes. FOR REVIEW ONLY Engineer P.E. No.Date Lexie England 139395 1/28/2025 GENERAL NOTES1.ACCORDING TO FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS FOR BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, MAP NO. 48041C0285E,EFFECTIVE DATE 05/16/2012, NO PART OF THIS TRACT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOOD HAZARD AREA.2.EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY PROVIDED IS BASED ON CONTOURS DERIVED FROM LIDAR DATA COLLECTION.3.THE EXISTING SITE IS UNDEVELOPED.4.DUE TO THE SITE'S LOCATION WITHIN THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION'S ETJ, IT DOES NOT HAVE A ZONINGDESIGNATION.5.THERE ARE NO PHASES PROPOSED WITH THIS PROJECT; THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT IS TO BE BUILTSIMULTANEOUSLY.6.COMMON AREAS WILL BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THEIR RESPECTIVE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATIONS(POA) . POA DOCUMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED WITH THE FINAL PLAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH UDO SECTION 8.4.S"OWNERS ASSOCIATIONS FOR COMMON AREAS AND FACILITIES."7.ALL PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ILLUSTRATED ON THESE PLANS ARE PRELIMINARY IN NATURE AND ARE SUBJECTTO FINAL DESIGN MODIFICATIONS WITH FINAL DESIGN AND PLATTING.8.MAIL SERVICE WILL BE ACCOMMODATED BY CLUSTER MAILBOXES LOCATED THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT.FINAL LOCATIONS WILL BE COORDINATED WITH THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE AND THE CITY OF COLLEGESTATION AS APPROPRIATE.9.ALL LOTS SHALL BE GRADED SUCH AS TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM ALL BUILDINGS. LOT GRADINGSHALL BE PROVIDED SUCH AS TO AVOID DRAINING ONTO ADJACENT DEVELOPABLE LOTS OR PROPERTY. ADETAILED GRADING PLAN SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS.10.COORDINATES AND BEARING SYSTEM SHOWN ARE NAD83 (TEXAS STATE PLANE CENTRAL ZONE GRID NORTH)BASED ON THE PUBLISHED COORDINATES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION CONTROL MONUMENT NO. 203 ANDESTABLISHED BY GPS OBSERVATION.11.THE EXISTING POND AND ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES ARE TO BE REMOVED.12.BUILDING SETBACKS SHALL BE ESTABLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BRAZOS COUNTY SUBDIVISIONREGULATIONS, ARTICLE 7, SECTION A-2.13.THE ORIGINAL VERSION OF THIS PRELIMINARY PLAN AND THE FOLLOWING WAIVERS WERE APPROVED BY THE CITYOF COLLEGE STATION AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING ON 5/18/2023:13.1.SCOTT STREET ROW WAIVER - REDUCED SECTION 8.4.C.8a OF CITY OF COLLEGE STATION CODE OFORDINANCES ROW WIDTH REQUIREMENT FROM 70' TO 50' FOR SCOTT STREET.13.2.MANDY LANE ROW WAIVER - REDUCED SECTION 8.4.C.8a OF CITY OF COLLEGE STATION CODE OF ORDINANCESROW WIDTH REQUIREMENT FROM 70' TO 50' FOR MANDY LANE.13.3.ROBIN ROAD ROW WAIVER - REDUCED SECTION 8.4.C.8a OF CITY OF COLLEGE STATION CODE OF ORDINANCESROW WIDTH REQUIREMENT FROM 70' TO 50' FOR ROBIN ROAD.13.4.SCOTT STREET ROAD SECTION WAIVER - ALLOWS SCOTT STREET TO BE CONSTRUCTED AS A RURALRESIDENTIAL STREET INSTEAD OF A LOCAL STREET PER SECTION 8.4.C.8a OF CITY OF COLLEGE STATION CODEOF ORDINANCES.13.5.MANDY LANE ROAD SECTION WAIVER - ALLOWS MANDY LANE TO BE CONSTRUCTED AS A RURAL RESIDENTIALSTREET INSTEAD OF A LOCAL STREET PER SECTION 8.4.C.8a OF CITY OF COLLEGE STATION CODE OFORDINANCES.13.6.ROBIN ROAD ROAD SECTION WAIVER - ALLOWS ROBIN ROAD TO BE CONSTRUCTED AS A RURAL RESIDENTIALSTREET INSTEAD OF A LOCAL STREET PER SECTION 8.4.C.8a OF CITY OF COLLEGE STATION CODE OFORDINANCES.14.12 INCH IRON RODS WITH BLUE PLASTIC CAPS STAMPED "KERR SURVEYING" SET AT ALL LOT CORNERS AND ANGLEPOINTS UNLESS IN CREEK OR OTHERWISE NOTED.15.(CM) INDICATES CONTROLLING MONUMENT FOUND AND USED TO ESTABLISH PROPERTY LINES.16.DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE SURFACE DISTANCES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. TO OBTAIN GRID DISTANCES(NOT AREAS) DIVIDE BY A COMBINED SCALE FACTOR OF 1.00010246501640 (CALCULATED USING GEOID12B).WATER AND SANITARY SEWER NOTES1.THIS SITE IS TO RECEIVE WATER UTILITY SERVICES FROM THE WELLBORN SPECIAL UTILITY DISTRICT. ALLPROPOSED PUBLIC WATER LINES WILL BE OWNED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED BY THE WELLBORN SPECIAL UTILITYDISTRICT UPON ACCEPTANCE OF SUCH.2.THE SITE IS TO BE SERVED BY A PROPOSED PACKAGE PLANT. TREATED WASTEWATER DISCHARGE HAS BEENAPPROVED BY TCEQ UNDER PERMIT NO. WQ0016377001. BATCH PLANT LOCATION AND DISCHARGE POINT ARESHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY. FINAL DESIGN WILL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY TCEQ.3.ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS (PRIVATE SEPTIC SYSTEMS), IF USED, SHALL BE DESIGNED TO AND MEET ALLREQUIREMENTS OF THE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT. THESE SYSTEMS SHALL BE LICENSED THROUGH THE SAMEAGENCY AND THE LICENSE SHALL BE KEPT CURRENT.4.WATER AND SANITARY SEWER SHOWN ON THE PRELIMINARY PLAN ARE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND ARESUBJECT TO CHANGE. A MASTER HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS FOR EACH SYSTEM WILL BE PROVIDED AT THE FINALSTATES OF PLATTING WHICH WILL DETERMINE RESPECTIVE LINE SIZE(S).STORM DRAINAGE AND DETENTION NOTES1.STORM WATER RUNOFF WILL BE CAPTURED AND CONVEYED BY SWALES AND UNDERGROUND STORM SEWERSYSTEMS TO PROPOSED DETENTION FACILITIES ONSITE. THE DETENTION PONDS WILL BE DESIGNED ANDCONSTRUCTED SUCH AS TO CONTROL THE PEAK RUNOFF DISCHARGE TO PRE-DEVELOPED FLOW RATES PER THEREQUIREMENTS OF THE 2012 B/CS UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES, STANDARDS, AND SPECIFICATIONS UNLESSOTHERWISE INDICATED BY WAY OF A VARIANCE.2.PRIVATE DRAINAGE SWALES, DETENTION FACILITIES, AND STORM SEWER BEYOND THE LIMITS OF RIGHT OF WAYWILL BE MAINTAINED BY THE DEVELOPER.PAVING NOTES1.THE PROPOSED EXTENSION TO HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER PARKWAY (SEE RURAL COLLECTOR SECTION VIEW THISSHEET) WILL BE OWNED, OPERATED, AND MAINTAINED BY BRAZOS COUNTY UPON ACCEPTANCE OF SUCH. ALLREMAINING PROPOSED ROADWAYS, ALTHOUGH DESIGNATED AS PUBLIC, WILL BE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED INACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 8 OF THE BRAZOS COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS.2.CUL-DE-SAC PAVEMENT RADII WILL BE 40' IN DIAMETER, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS.3.ALL PROPOSED STREETS ARE TO BE MADE OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT.EXISTING EASEMENT NOTES1.ELECTRICAL EASEMENT TO THE CITY OF BRYAN (VOL. 144, PG. 68 DRBCT) DOES AFFECT THE PORTION OF THISTRACT CONVEYED IN DEED VOL. 3379, PG. 21 OPRBCT. THIS EASEMENT IS BLANKET IN NATURE AND CALLED TO BE20' WIDE CENTERED ON AERIAL ELECTRIC LINES AS INSTALLED AND AS SHOWN HEREON.2.ELECTRICAL EASEMENT TO THE CITY OF BRYAN (VOL. 144, PG. 109 DRBCT) DOES AFFECT THE PORTION OF THISTRACT CONVEYED IN DEED VOL. 11072, PG. 263 OPRBCT. THIS EASEMENT IS BLANKET IN NATURE AND CALLED TO BE20' WIDE CENTERED ON AERIAL ELECTRIC LINES AS INSTALLED AND CANNOT BE PLOTTED AS NO EXISTING AERIALELECTRIC LINES WERE FOUND IN THIS AREA.3.TELEPHONE EASEMENT TO GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHWEST (VOL. 1011, PG. 606 ORBCT) DOESAFFECT THE PORTION OF THIS TRACT CONVEYED IN DEED VOL. 11702, PG. 266 OPRBCT AS SHOWN HEREON.4.TELEPHONE EASEMENT TO GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHWEST (VOL. 1011, PG. 612 ORBCT) DOESAFFECT THE PORTION OF THIS TRACT CONVEYED IN DEED VOL. 11702, PG. 263 OPRBCT AS SHOWN HEREON.5.WATERLINE EASEMENT TO BRUSH WATER SUPPLY CORP. (VOL. 1302, PG. 341 ORBCT) DOES AFFECT THE PORTIONOF THIS TRACT CONVEYED IN DEED VOL. 11072, PG. 266 OPRBCT.. THE DESCRIBED APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF THISEASEMENT IS SHOWN HEREON. ACTUAL LOCATION OF EASEMENT TO CENTERED ON THE INSTALLED PIPE. BRUSHYWATER SUPPLY CORP ASSIGNED THIS EASEMENT TO WSUD IN VOL. 10359, PG. 62.6.WATERLINE EASEMENT TO BRUSH WATER SUPPLY CORP. (VOL. 1302, PG. 344 ORBCT) DOES AFFECT THE PORTIONOF THIS TRACT CONVEYED IN DEED VOL. 11702, PG. 263 OPRBCT. THE DESCRIBED APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF THISEASEMENT IS SHOWN HEREON. ACTUAL LOCATION OF EASEMENT TO CENTERED ON THE INSTALLED PIPE. BRUSHYWATER SUPPLY CORP ASSIGNED THIS EASEMENT TO WSUD IN VOL. 10359, PG. 62.PRIVATELY MAINTAINED STREETS NOTES:1.IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT ON APPROVAL OF THIS PRELIMINARY PLAN BY THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT OF BRAZOSCOUNTY, TEXAS, THE BUILDING OF ALL STREETS, ROADS AND OTHER PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES DELINEATED ANDSHOWN ON THIS PRELIMINARY PLAN AS PRIVATELY MAINTAINED, AND ALL BRIDGES AND CULVERTS NECESSARY TOBE CONSTRUCTED OR PLACED IN SUCH STREETS, ROADS OTHER PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES, OR IN CONNECTIONTHEREWITH, SHALL REMAIN THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER, HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION/PROPERTYOWNERS ASSOCIATION, OR OTHER MAINTENANCE ENTITY AND/OR APPLICANT OF THE TRACT OF LAND COVERED BYTHIS PRELIMINARY PLAN, IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THECOMMISSIONER'S COURT OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS. THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT ASSUMES NO OBLIGATION TOBUILD THE STREETS, ROADS AND OTHER PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES SHOWN ON THIS PLAT, OR OF CONSTRUCTINGANY BRIDGES OR CULVERTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH.2.PRIVATELY MAINTAINED STREETS SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO SUCH A STANDARD WHICH WILL ALLOW EMERGENCYVEHICLES ACCESS FOR THE ROAD DESIGN SPEED IN PERPETUITY BY THE OWNER AND ALL FUTURE OWNERS OFPROPERTY WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION.3.CERTAIN COUNTY SERVICES MAY NOT BE PROVIDED FOR PRIVATELY MAINTAINED STREETS. AMONG THE SERVICESWHICH MAY NOT BE PROVIDED ARE: ROUTINE LAW ENFORCEMENT PATROLS, ENFORCEMENT OF TRAFFIC ANDPARKING REGULATIONS, AND PREPARATION OF ACCIDENT REPORTS.4.THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION/PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION OR DISTRICT, AS OWNER OF THE PRIVATELYMAINTAINED STREETS AND APPURTENANCES, AGREES TO RELEASE, INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THECOUNTY, ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY, AND ANY PUBLIC UTILITY ENTITY FOR DAMAGES TO PRIVATELYMAINTAINED STREETS THAT MAY BE OCCASIONED BY THE REASONABLE USE OF THE PRIVATELY MAINTAINEDSTREETS BY SAME, OR FOR DAMAGES AND INJURY (INCLUDING DEATH) ARISING FROM THE CONDITION OF THEPRIVATELY MAINTAINED STREETS, USE OF ACCESS GATES OR CROSS-ARMS, OR USE OF THE SUBDIVISION BY THECOUNTY OR ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL OR UTILITY ENTITY.5.EVERY DEED SHALL CONTAIN A NOTICE TO THE GRANTEE THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS SHALL BE PERPETUALLYLIABLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF ALL STREETS DESIGNATED AS PRIVATELY MAINTAINED, AND THAT THE QUALITY OFTHE ROADS MUST BE MAINTAINED AS TO NOT AFFECT ACCESS BY PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES SUCH AS POLICE,FIRE, AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES.GENERAL NOTES 4ROADWAY TYPICAL SECTIONS(NOT TO SCALE)BRAZOS COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONSAPPENDIX G.4 - OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIESIT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER, NOT THE COUNTY, TO ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ALLAPPLICABLE STATE, FEDERAL AND LOCAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO THE PLATTING AND DEVELOPMENT OFTHIS PROPERTY.THE COUNTY ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF REPRESENTATIONS BY THE OTHER PARTIES INTHIS PLAT. FLOODPLAIN DATA, IN PARTICULAR, MAY CHANGE. IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD THAT THE OWNERS OF THETRACT OF LAND COVERED BY THIS PLAT MUST INSTALL AT THEIR OWN EXPENSE ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ANDSIGNAGE THAT MAY BE REQUIRED BEFORE THE ROADS IN THE SUBDIVISION HAVE FINALLY BEEN ACCEPTED FORMAINTENANCE BY THE COUNTY.PRELIMINARY PLAN - NOT FOR RECORDAMENDED PRELIMINARY PLANFORCOLLEGE STATION WEST41.83 ACRE TRACTBEING ALL OF A CALLED 22.172 ACRE TRACTCONVEYED IN VOLUME 3379, PAGE 21 OPRBCT,THE REMAINDER OF FIVE TRACTS OF LANDCONVEYED IN VOLUME 11072, PAGE 263 OPRBCT,AND THE REMAINDER OF A CALLED 2 ACRE TRACTCONVEYED IN VOLUME 11072, PAGE 266 OPRBCTJOHN H. JONES SURVEY, ABSTRACT 144BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS4 PROPOSED LOTS & COMMON AREAS 1 & 2JANUARY 2025PROPERTY OWNER/DEVELOPERTB COLLEGE STATION DEV, LLC6001-2 W WILLIAM CANNON DRSTE 101AUSTIN, TX 78749PH: (512) 800-4534CONTACT: AARON LEVYSURVEYORKERR SURVEYING409 N TEXAS AVEBRYAN, TX 77803PH: (979) 268-3195CONTACT: NATHAN KERR, R.P.L.S.ENGINEERKIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES6800 BURLESON ROADBUILDING 312, SUITE 150AUSTIN, TX 78744PH: (512) 646-2237CONTACT: LEXIE ENGLAND, P.E.Page 37 of 67 Planning & Development Services • 1101 Texas Avenue, PO Box 9960 • College Station, TX 77840 Office 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM February 20, 2025 TO: Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Jesse DiMeolo Senior Planner, Planning & Development Services SUBJECT: Active Transportation Master Plan Initial Public Engagement Recap Item: Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a recap of the public engagement last November and December for the Active Transportation Master Plan. Summary: Last November, the City of College Station Planning and Development Services opened online engagement and an in-person meeting to receive feedback from citizens on the City’s current and proposed pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Attendees also provided comments on their vision for the community and how to increase bicycle and pedestrian activity. The online engagement was active for one month, from November 4th to December 4th. The in-person meeting was on November 20th at City Hall. We collected 202 online comments and 151 comments from the in-person meeting. All these comments can be viewed in the two attached excel spreadsheets. If there is no sticker number, the comment was made online, or a sticker wasn’t placed when a route was drawn. If a comment is blank or states “NC,” no comment was given, just an indication of like, dislike or a route drawn. The three most common responses to the Community Vision Board were increased shade and landscaping to improve comfort levels, more separated bike lanes, and increased safety for all ages and abilities. The common themes from the comment cards are as follows: Bicycle-Related Themes 1. Safety Issues: a. Unsafe bike lanes due to fast-moving traffic and poor separation from vehicles. b. Frequent conflicts with turning cars and unclear intersection rules. c. Visibility challenges and hazardous conditions due to debris or weather-related issues. 2. Infrastructure Improvements: a. Requests for protected bike lanes and multi-use paths for safer cycling. b. Grade-separated crossings to reduce interaction with vehicular traffic. c. Better bike lane maintenance, such as repainting and surface smoothing. Page 38 of 67 3. Connectivity and Accessibility: a. Need for continuous bike lanes connecting key areas like campus, residential neighborhoods, and shopping centers. b. Suggestions for bike racks at parks and public locations. c. Desire for bike-friendly infrastructure that supports commuting as a primary mode of transport. Pedestrian-Related Themes 1. Safety Issues: a. Dangerous intersections for pedestrians due to high traffic speeds and poor driver awareness. b. Lack of crosswalks or unsafe crossing points near major roads and bus stops. c. Poor visibility at corners and congested areas, leading to hazardous situations for pedestrians. 2. Infrastructure Improvements: a. Requests for more sidewalks, particularly in areas near schools, parks, and residential neighborhoods. b. Suggestions for pedestrian bridges or underpasses to improve crossing safety. c. Maintenance concerns, such as overgrown paths and uneven sidewalks. 3. Connectivity: a. Desire for pedestrian paths connecting parks, neighborhoods, and public amenities. b. Calls for efficient pedestrian routes with green spaces incorporated for a better walking experience. If interested in seeing all responses collected from the engagement in a more visual representation, please use the following link for the pedestrian plan comments: https://cstx.maps.arcgis.com/apps/dashboards/d187321fa6f1499191ac864c15d83ad9 Use this link to view comments on the bicycle plan: https://cstx.maps.arcgis.com/apps/dashboards/94faa91da2ca4a7890c5d445a8289f68 After opening the webpages, click on any object ID and it will automatically zoom to where the comment was made. At the next Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board meeting, city staff will propose a draft community vision and goals document with the aim of this being the statement that helps guide all future master planning efforts. Attachments: 1. Memorandum 2. Community Vision Board 3. Online & In-Person Bicycle Comments 4. Online & In-Person Pedestrian Comments Page 39 of 67 Page 40 of 67 Sticker # (In-Person Meeting Comments Only) Comments Type Input Type 1 I would use this to walk to HEB from colleges hills neighborhood because you wouldnt need to wait at light with groceries. I like this In-Person 2 would be cool to connect mall to campus via existing trails. I have an idea or alternative In-Person 3 Here no sidewalks on the west side of hwy 6 down harvey road I have concerns about this In-Person 4 Safe pedestrian travel on east side of hwy 6 on harvey is needed! I have concerns about this In-Person 5 there NEEDS to be a sidewalk on both sides of south college ave. Closer to university. I see students who live at U centre traversing a parking lot to get to the intersection to get to class. This is extremely dangerous because of reckless drivers and theres no designated walkway for pedestrians.I have an idea or alternative In-Person 6 Empty land that has yet to be developed in northgate has no sidewalks. A temporary solution should be put in place in these areas like jersey barriers in the road or even a temporary sidewalk that is kept in place while the lot sits empty and goes through the development process. This is also important to consider for smaller projects such as sidewalk repair that close sidewalks. I have an idea or alternative In-Person 7 this is a busy intersection that could really benefit from increasing pedestrians and bikers safety. There would definitely be an increase in walking and biking traffic then. I would use this intersection more if there was a pedestrian bridge or safe, protected bike lanes. I like this In-Person 8 Would love to have this for running or walking. Especially great if connected to veterans or lick creek I like this In-Person 9 There is no sidewalk on this road connecting CS and Bryan, I work at amarillo national bank and take this route to walk or bike to restaurants for lunch. The bridge makes it hard to travel by foot. I have concerns about this In-Person 13 Since this crossing would be pretty short in length, i think a pedestrian bridge over the road would be really cool and safe I have an idea or alternative In-Person I Like This, I Have Concerns About This, I Have An Idea Or Alternative Pedestrian Point Comments - Place A Point and Make A Comment Using The Types: Page 41 of 67 Sticker # (In-Person Meeting Comments Only) Comments Type Input Type 14 Great use green space. However, i feel this pathway needs better maintenance. I love wide sidewalks! I like this In-Person 25 Ped bridge needed. Bee creek install the bridge first before the pedestrian path. The path is currently use by dog walkers runners and cyclists. I like this In-Person There shoule be another crosswalk somewhere between Southwest and Welsh, I constantly see people dodging traffic to cross, esp. to make it to a bus stop I have an idea or alternative Online The city expanded it's parkland in this area. Would greatly like to see trails built out in this area that connect with Raintree park.I have an idea or alternative Online The existing greenway is the perfect area for easily expanding on the available walk/run/bike trails thru the neighborhood. Would like to see the raintree sidewalks to nowhere expanded to actual trails.I have an idea or alternative Online Make this connection part of the SE Park Improvements I have an idea or alternative Online Stripe & sign cross walk to Brothers park I have an idea or alternative Online Install receiving ped ramp. Sign & stripe cross walk I have an idea or alternative Online this path is not mowed with any frequency and can get overgrown making it difficult to walk through I have concerns about this Online this intersection is very difficult to cross on foot or bike. Cars are driving too fast to make it safe. I have concerns about this Online This intersection is ROUGH. The blinking orange arrows cause near collisions with pedestrians and left turning cars DAILY. The right hand slip lanes cause pedestrians to almost be hit as well.I have concerns about this Online Cars regularly refuse to stop for pedestrians (mostly children walking to school) to safely use the crosswalk.I have concerns about this Online This is a difficult point to cross as well. LOTS of traffic and pedestrians must look out for cars coming through the crosswalk in multiple directions I have concerns about this Online This corner is nearly blind and congested with cars I have concerns about this Online Page 42 of 67 Sticker # (In-Person Meeting Comments Only) Comments Type Input Type This whole area is a problem. The protected lanes in/out of Havarty's/Target to Holleman are difficult to navigate. Pedestrians cross Holleman in the middle of the street to get to the apartments in the area. It is very dangerous.I have concerns about this Online The pedestrian ramp is too narrow and an awkward angle for anyone not walking. Part of the curb needs to be removed.I have concerns about this Online A reasonable way to walk from here to New Main Drive would be greatly appreciated I have concerns about this Online Rare that cars actually know what to do in this intersection.I have concerns about this Online This intersection is pretty unclear. Some cars will stop for pedestrians others fly by. Some pedestrians stop, others wait for cars.I have concerns about this Online not sure if the far right lane is a slip lane but it should not be and "No Right on Red". Drivers constantly ignore stop line and block crosswalk without regard if there are pedestrians or not.I have concerns about this Online The all weather crossings on Butterfly Alley keep washing out.I have concerns about this Online This path crosses my private property. How much ROW is going to be taken, and will I still be able to use the private drive it runs down?I have concerns about this Online Prior to construction on Francis, the cyclepath extended north from Munson all the way to the end of Francis. There is no longer a cycle path along this stretch but one is needed for safe access to and from College Hill Elementary and Texas A&M I have concerns about this Online Traffic on Francis travels much too quickly. This is unsafe for cyclists and pedestrians. Trafic calming measures are needed on this road. I have concerns about this Online Drivers turning west on University do not respect pedestrian light. Solution: When walk button is activated by pedestrian, drivers need to have a RED light, not green.I have concerns about this Online Really excited to have sidewalks here so I can easily get to Blue Baker from City Hall!I like this Online I like the idea of a better bike path/walking path for students to College Station Middle School I like this Online Page 43 of 67 Sticker # (In-Person Meeting Comments Only) Comments Type Input Type I would LOVE a multi use path on this part of Rock Prairie Road!I like this Online I would LOVE to have a multi use path on this side of Harvey Mitchell Pkwy too!I like this Online this path would be great for my commute biking my son to daycare I like this Online Fairview has needed a sidewalk for a long time. Especially for game days.I like this Online The Lick Creek Shared Use Path is a gem of a facility. I walk and ride it regularly!I like this Online The path at Central Park is a wonderful facility!I like this Online I walk regularly at Gabbard park sidewalk and enjoy the pond and community interaction.I like this Online 63 NC Route I Currently Walk In-Person 1 Walking to independence park from fitch, off of bike path Route I Would Like To Walk In-Person 2 Need a bridge to cross bee creek to get to the park. Route I Would Like To Walk In-Person 3 3. rio grande through SW valley is overbuilt and cars go too fast for a neighborhood. Take out turn lane, introduce separated shared use path Route I Would Like To Walk In-Person 4 17 25 5 46 and 48 4. lick creek access, not through pebble creek 17. Veterans park to texas independence park through utility easement shared use path 5. carter creek greenway 48.We would like to be able to walk to veterans park from rain tree Route I Would Like To Walk In-Person 6 6. ped access to jones crossing from holleman Route I Would Like To Walk In-Person 7 20 and 47 grade separated crossings at harvey mitchell, rio grande or welsh 47. We would like to be able to walk to veterans park from rain tree Route I Would Like To Walk In-Person Ped Route Comments - Draw A Route You Currently Walk or Would Like To Walk Page 44 of 67 Sticker # (In-Person Meeting Comments Only) Comments Type Input Type 13 I would like a safe and fast way to walk to HEB. Currently the high speed limit on texas deters me because it is so loud and the stroad is dangerous, cross walk times are slow. Route I Would Like To Walk In-Person 14 14. More ped friendly access to lick creek greenway Route I Would Like To Walk In-Person 15 New castle rock greenway trail Route I Would Like To Walk In-Person 16 16. Expand paths in lick creek. City owns more land that is underutilized, expand the park for more recreation and capacity. Route I Would Like To Walk In-Person 18 18. Bee creek to central park path Route I Would Like To Walk In-Person 19 and 34 19. Bachmann park to greenway Route I Would Like To Walk In-Person 29 I constantly have to cross and see people cross southwest between welsh and southwest. With that distance and with all the apartments, bus stops, restaurants, and park there needs to be a crosswalk somewhere in a halfway point. Route I Currently Walk In-Person 33 In my opinion, rock prairie road is practically unwalkable. Cars are too fast, too loud, and arent paying attention when turning on/off the main road. The most ridiculous thing (and by ridiculous, i mean insulting) is the “press button to cross” crossing in front of st. Joseph hospital. I'm never going to use it because I dont trust drivers to notice me or the flashing lights or slow down for me. Route I Would Like To Walk In-Person 35 I think its important to create ped routes that are efficient, but also incorporate plants/green spaces. Maintenance of ped routes (sidewalks, tree limbs etc.. ) must be considered. Route I Would Like To Walk In-Person 37 Two areas in lick creek park 1. raccoon run trail needs upgrading to the muddy areas (fixing raised walkways) 2. yaupon loop needs some better signage. The area between signs 12 and 13 have some off shoots and its easy to go off the trail.Route I Would Like To Walk In-Person Page 45 of 67 Sticker # (In-Person Meeting Comments Only) Comments Type Input Type 50 I would love to have a bridge across bee creek to access the park here. This would make the park more accessible to nearby neighborhoods. A path along the easement would be nice too. Dirth path is fine! Route I Currently Walk In-Person 51 Regarding the stretch of harvey road from merry oaks to george bush drive east, it would be helpful to have at least one side of the street with a continuous sidewalk so that peds dont have to track through the grass for safe passage. Route I Currently Walk In-Person 52 NC Route I Currently Walk In-Person 53 There is a sidewalk on longmire that ends abruptly, it would be nice to have that continue Route I Currently Walk In-Person 54 Crossing rock prairie at normand is like playing chicken, its very heavy traffic and no ped safe infrastructure. Luckily, i can run fast enough to get to the other side, but its not safe for most people. Even a flashing ped crossing sign wouldnt catch enough attention because speeds are so high and the lanes are so wide. Route I Currently Walk In-Person 61 The lights along university all take far too long to change for peds. It encourages people to risk crossing when the light is red. The lights also only change once the button is pressed. Meaning that if you come up on it just a second late, you have to sit through a whole other cycle. Route I Currently Walk In-Person 68 and 49 I think its important to create ped routes that are efficient, but also incorporate plants/green spaces. Maintenance of ped routes (sidewalks, tree limbs etc.. ) must be considered. Never had issues walking here prior to today (usually walk during day) but this evening me and my friend were almost side swipe by a car turning from texas onto francis. Route I Currently Walk In-Person Page 46 of 67 Sticker # (In-Person Meeting Comments Only) Comments Type Input Type 69 The existing sidewalks on francis and glenhaven are great! There are many people that use them throughout the year. The 8 foot walk on francis is wonderful. It has had a definite impact upon the neighborhood for the better. There needs to be designated bike lanes on both streets for bikes, scooter and skateboards. Thank you! Route I Currently Walk In-Person This is my current running route. I love it, but a sidewalk along Victoria would be much appreciated Route I Currently Walk Online I frequently walk this route for school drop off/pick up and to use the park after school hours. Crossing Deacon Dr and Edelweiss Ave are the most stressful point on this walk. Other families I know try to walk this route as little as possible because of these difficult crossings. Route I Currently Walk Online Currently walk this neighborhood (Wilderness Dr loop) as the sidewalk path connected to raintree park is too short.Route I Currently Walk Online A sidewalk connection here connecting lick creek and william d fitch would be great Route I Currently Walk Online "Parks-Connect" route. Approx. 6 miles according to google maps estimate. Excellent walking route. Many restrooms along the way. The route requires crossing Texas Ave. twice (possible deterant). Route I Currently Walk Online Would love to see a sidewalk down Arboleda and Quail Run. Route I Currently Walk Online daily commute to daycare + neighborhood walking. for the most part it feels safe with a lot of other kids commuting by bike Route I Currently Walk Online daily commute with bike to campus Route I Currently Walk Online To and From Gameday Route I Currently Walk Online main access route into campus from College Hills Estates lacks sidewalk making so it is very unsafe for pedestrians. Route I Currently Walk Online Sidewalk on glade is not always safe due to cracks, unlevel surface, etc.Route I Currently Walk Online Page 47 of 67 Sticker # (In-Person Meeting Comments Only) Comments Type Input Type I would love to use the multi-use path on GPR, but I don't feel safe walking here without sidewalk. I feel safer walking up Victoria without sidewalks. Route I Would Like To Walk Online There is no sidewalk on this side of the road, But there IS a well worn path in the grass/dirt. We should pave it!Route I Would Like To Walk Online Would like to be able to walk on sidewalks from raintree park to the Emerald Forest Park. The greenways that are already cleared would be perfect to extend as a running/walking path.Route I Would Like To Walk Online If WPC trail could connect with trails bulit around the raintree park as well as continued walk/run/bike paths along the existing greenways, that would vastly improve the length & quality of the trails in the city. However the biggest hurdle here is the the highway. If there was a way to connect the two sides via a pedestrian only path, then this could be a great addition. Route I Would Like To Walk Online I live near the Southwest Park. Going through Welsh avenue and then through South Dexter Drive is the only way for me to walk to campus especially on weekends and holidays. The portion of S Dexter Drive I highlighted does not have a sidewalk and would really appreciate if you guys could build one. Route I Would Like To Walk Online Connecting the sidewalk/shared use path across Wellborn Rd at 2818 to make a continuous path from hwy 6 to University Dr. Route I Would Like To Walk Online side walk on the west side of Wellborn.Route I Would Like To Walk Online End of Holleman is narrow road with deep ditches. Need safe place to walk for kids to get to school.Route I Would Like To Walk Online Missing sidewalk Route I Would Like To Walk Online Would like an all weather path connecting the neighborhood to Lick Creek Park Route I Would Like To Walk Online Many familes live in this neighborhood but lack safe space to walk Route I Would Like To Walk Online families live on this road but cannot walk safely to/from school Route I Would Like To Walk Online neighborhood lacks safe access the Thomas Park Route I Would Like To Walk Online sidwalks needs in this family-orientated neighborhood surrounding Parkway Park Route I Would Like To Walk Online Page 48 of 67 Sticker # (In-Person Meeting Comments Only) Comments Type Input Type but it is too busy Route I Would Like To Walk Online Page 49 of 67 Sticker # (In-Person Meeting Comments Only) Comments Type Input Type 1 Add ped signal/crosswalk where bike route intersects big roads (dexter/holleman) I have an idea or alternative In-Person 2 I have nearly been hit by a right turning car every time i have crossed TX northbound. Crossing southbound, left turning cars will keep going after the red, then right turning cars will take over, so the entire time the ped signal is on, its been taken by turning cars. I have concerns about this In-Person 3 There are a lot of 3rd spaces existing down rock prairie that should be easily accessible by foot or bicycle I like this In-Person 6 I love the idea of using the easement for a shared use path! I would ride this all the time. I like this In-Person 9 southwood valley, paths along drainage away from road I like this In-Person 11 Bike lanes/connection on wellborn (shared path) I have an idea or alternative In-Person 12 Bike lanes/connection on wellborn (shared path) I have an idea or alternative In-Person 13 Bus island. So bikes do not come into conflicts with buses/peds/cars. Especially at #13, the hill by park west. When you are going downhill you gain a lot of speed and are forced to make a quick decision to go into the car lane or sidewalk. This could lead to a crash. When a bike is going up hill if they have to stop due to a bus they lose momentum and may be forced to walk up hill. I have an idea or alternative In-Person 25 Bike activated sensor loop in bike lane to activate a change in traffic light at the following intersections: Anderson & Southwest, Anderson & Holleman, Welsh & Southwest, Welsh & 2818, Arrington & Fitch I have concerns about this In-Person 26 Tarrow street/east 29th. Needs better pedestrian sidewalks connecting to Bryan I have an idea or alternative In-Person 36 Would love this for commuting/fun I like this In-Person I Like This, I Have Concerns About This, I Have An Idea Or Alternative Bicycle Point Comments - Place a Point and Make a Comment Using the Types: Page 50 of 67 Sticker # (In-Person Meeting Comments Only) Comments Type Input Type 44 The housing units (woodlands) campus village, lake ridge, red point, gateway etc... are kind of gridlocked by wellborn and harvey mitchell! It would be great to have a bike route directly to HEB on wellborn. It is so annoying going a roundabout way, when the route to HEB (as the crow flies) is much shorter and suitable for micromobility I have an idea or alternative In-Person 73 Grade separation would be great down university/raymond stotzer. Especially with the traffic congestion. I have concerns about this In-Person 74 Grade separation would be great down university/raymond stotzer. Especially with the traffic congestion. I have an idea or alternative In-Person 75 the bike lane on university between hwy 6 and hwy 30 should be protected! I have concerns about this In-Person 76 I commute on university east of hwy 6 and the bike lane is nice BUT often too dirty/bumpy so I ride the sidewalk. The bike lane still provides a buffer from the sidewalk making the commute better. I like this In-Person 78 Safe biking on Harvey Road also pedestrian travel safely would be good. I have an idea or alternative In-Person 78 This intersection and many others in town don’t detect or change for bikes despite having bike lanes on either side. I have concerns about this In-Person 79 need lick creek path crosswalk for when path is flooded. See council minutes! I have concerns about this In-Person 85 Rock prairie and wellborn road has no bike options east of wellborn road. Theres a sidewalk but not appropriate bike paths. I have concerns about this In-Person 86 Grade separation would be great down university/raymond stotzer. Especially with the traffic congestion. I like this In-Person 87 This would be amazing recreationally and would remove a dangerous part of my commute I have concerns about this In-Person 88 Please connect bryan and college station with some kind of bike lane here. Its a blind curve with no sidewalk or bike lane, hardly a shoulder. I have concerns about this In-Person Page 51 of 67 Sticker # (In-Person Meeting Comments Only) Comments Type Input Type 90 There is green painted for bike use at this underpass, but it is still very dangerous at night visibility is challenging with bright tunnel and dark outside. And students don't pay much attention when passing westside of underpass, bike lane disappears and makes you cross parking garage entrance. I have concerns about this In-Person 91 harvey road at post oak mall sign. Need sidewalk or ADA access up the hill! I have concerns about this In-Person 92 Dutch intersection I have an idea or alternative In-Person 99 At the intersection of welsh and southwest, there is sand for a longtime now. This resulted in falling of couple of bikers including me. So if we can keep the red light intersections clean of mud and sand, it will be very helpful. RAJA. I have concerns about this In-Person Jones Buttler under 2818 and out to Holleman should be developed as a major bicycle route. It has incredibly easy access to campus and tons of student housing I have an idea or alternative Online could the middle turning lane be changed to a through lane for cars trying to pass the school, and the existing lane be used as the place to queue the parents trying to drop off students at the school? Thus freeing the bike lane for cyclist's use? I have an idea or alternative Online There needs to be a safe way to cross Holleman while traveling the bike route I have an idea or alternative Online Bike/ ped bridge to the grocery store I have an idea or alternative Online Bus Island to avoid conflicts with aggie spririt and bike/escooter/ebike commuters. The downhill just makes it so hard to stop, and you have to choose between the sidewalk where peds are, or the street where cars whiz by I have an idea or alternative Online Dutch style intersection I have an idea or alternative Online Bus Island I have an idea or alternative Online Page 52 of 67 Sticker # (In-Person Meeting Comments Only) Comments Type Input Type Dutch Intersection. This intersection is chaos. I have an idea or alternative Online Bike lane does not exist on the direction towards park west I have an idea or alternative Online bus island I have an idea or alternative Online curbs separating bikes from cars. Cars go really fast on this road due to wide lanes, and minimal traffic I have an idea or alternative Online The Bike lane going towards John Crompton needs a curb. It is so narrow, and the paint is pretty much gone. A curb would allow physical separation, and would not need to be repainted as often I have an idea or alternative Online This road needs to be car free during the day honestly. Buses and bikes should be able to freely flow through here, or there needs to be designated space for bikes with curb separation. I would suggest a light, but people are always running late for class I think it would make people angry or they wouldn't follow the rule. Maybe a ped bridge? But it would have to be accessible for disabled folks as well I have an idea or alternative Online shared use path for bikes could be on smoother surfaces. Its hard to pedal uphill, and the bumps in the sidewalk kind of slow you down. I have an idea or alternative Online There should be a bicycle priority transportation cross section type that provides for buffered bicycle lanes and cycle tracks. With this type we should designate a priority buffered bicycle spine running north-south along Welsh & Victoria that is all ages and abilities. I have an idea or alternative Online This bicycle plan treats all on-street bicycle facilities the same. There needs to be distinctions between a stripe on the road and temporary and permanent buffered bicycle lanes that are for all ages and abilities. I have an idea or alternative Online Page 53 of 67 Sticker # (In-Person Meeting Comments Only) Comments Type Input Type Can you create more distinction in your bicycle map like the City of Austin has? More nuanced planning will make for better on the ground outcomes:https://austin.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=c7fecf32a2d94 6fabdf062285d58d40c&extent=3052120.7123%2C10036958.1486%2C3179054.0456%2C10 097891.4819%2C102739 I have an idea or alternative Online Can we have grade separation just for bicycles along key routes? It looks like your grade separation is only based on cars but separate grade separations for bicycles would be really beneficial (and cheaper). I have an idea or alternative Online The path should go under Texas Ave. here where the creek goes underneath. Crossing Texas Ave. here is difficult. The pedestrian green light turns green while Harvey traffic also has a green light. I have an idea or alternative Online Please put a "dead end" sign where thepath splits (around the baseball fields and the dead end) for bikers/peds until the bee creek path gets built. Every week I hope the path has been created here and I always forget it doesnt exist. I have an idea or alternative Online This bike lane should not exist. Instead it should continue NE along New Main. There should be an extended right turn lane on New Main with a bike lane to its left, providing an extended stretch of straight road where bikes can move across the right turn lane and continue straight. I have an idea or alternative Online Bicycles and pedestrians proceeding southeast along the multi-use path must cross the turning lane at an awkward location, guessing which cars are going to turn. It would be much safer to have curb ramps and a marked crossing where the turning ramps intersect New Main Drive, even though there wouldn't be a traffic light there. I have an idea or alternative Online Bike route all along Southwest Pkwy is not very safe when sharing road with vehicles exceeding speed limit. I have concerns about this Online 40mph speed limit too high for residential area. I have concerns about this Online traffic calming measures need to be implemented due to speed limit not being followed I have concerns about this Online Page 54 of 67 Sticker # (In-Person Meeting Comments Only) Comments Type Input Type MISSING SIDEWALK BIG BIG BIG PROBLEM HERE I have concerns about this Online No sidewalk here, occasional problem I have concerns about this Online I hate the curb cuts here they're bumpy I have concerns about this Online Ped island gets awkward with more than one bike in it I have concerns about this Online Coming from Bryan and trying to make a left hand turn onto New Main here sucks. *Modified for inappropriate language.* I have concerns about this Online Trying to turn left onto GB from Bizzell sucks I have concerns about this Online ped signal hard to hit on a bike I have concerns about this Online right turning traffic has no respect for peds, bikes, or human life in general I have concerns about this Online There's a retaining wall somewhere in this area that makes this sidewalk really narrow when attempting to pass a ped or another bike I have concerns about this Online lotta disrepect from the cars in this spot I have concerns about this Online double 90 degree angle in a bit of sidewalk around here. Completely (messes up) bikes. *Modified for inappropriate language.* I have concerns about this Online I'm putting another one here because I want you to understand this missing piece of sidewalk is going to be the death of me one day. I will get hit and killed in a car behind the Caldwell Banker and it will be because there's no sidewalk here I have concerns about this Online Not much protection for bikers to cross here. Cars are not looking for cyclists and pedestrians. I have concerns about this Online cars drive/ park in this bike lane daily, despite the signage saying not to. I have concerns about this Online Page 55 of 67 Sticker # (In-Person Meeting Comments Only) Comments Type Input Type Bike lane randomly disappears here I have concerns about this Online There is currently no bike rack to lock bikes at Thomas Park. I think there was a rack at the old swimming pool. It must have been removed along with the swimming pool. I have concerns about this Online I appreciate the pedestrian crosswalk located here at Harvey Rd. and Oak park. However, the traffic sign here is confusing. It's either a stop sign or its not. Some cars stop and others do not. If one car stops there is still another lane that may not be visible. The cars may not stop in that other lane. Perhaps a flashing light or red light for traffic to stop when pedestrians push a button to cross would be a better idea. The sign is confusing as a driver too. Is it a stop sign or not? I feel a yield to pedestrians makes more sense. I have concerns about this Online Sidewalk ramp is blocked partially by curb and is awkward to anyone not walking. The curb needs to be partially removed to accommodate everyone. I have concerns about this Online Map is incorrect: there is no existing bike lane on this dangerous 150' stretch of New Main Dr I have concerns about this Online Waiting to cross Texas is scary with cars turning left from University and coming within three feet of where you wait. There's no protection. I have concerns about this Online Making a left from New Main onto Lamar is challenging. There's no bike lane for turning left, and the traffic lights are timed so that an armada of cars arrives from turning left from Texas Ave just as you're trying to cross lanes of traffic to get on the left side of the road. I have concerns about this Online the bike lane is fine as is, what i dont like is why arent the rest of the bike lanes in College Station the same? I have concerns about this Online this street is currently used as a parking lot for people riding the bus that stops on Rock Prairie. Monday - Thursday there is usually 10 - 12 cars parked on both sides of the street during daylight hours. There is no room for a bike lane unless an alternative parking area is provided for bus riders. I have concerns about this Online Page 56 of 67 Sticker # (In-Person Meeting Comments Only) Comments Type Input Type CSISD bond was approved to create a new parking and student drop off area on Edelweiss and Welch. This needs to be taken into cosideration when planning for a bike lane. Many parents park on both sides of the street when attending events at the school. I have concerns about this Online What does this "bike route" entail? cars still drive through here going 75 mph and even if there is a wide shoulder it still doesn't feel safe. I have concerns about this Online was almost hit here because a car wasn't looking for me on their right hand turn. I have concerns about this Online this intersection is the wild west during classes. I have seen so many scooter and bike wrecks here because they cross without looking around at all. I have concerns about this Online I got knocked over by a car here last week pulling out of this parking lot. There are several parking lots along this part of university that cars frequently pull out of without checking for peds/bikes on the sidewalk! I have concerns about this Online I agree with the other person. This small section of no sidewalk has made my bike commute significantly worse I have concerns about this Online Glad to have a bike lane here but the traffic is pretty fast so it should be protected bike lane from 30 to 6. I have concerns about this Online I agree with the other person I've almost been run over by a pickup here while I was on a bike. I have concerns about this Online My buddy got bumped by a pickup here while they were turning left from ross onto new main. Biking. Needs a left turn bike lane or something. I have concerns about this Online Narrow and somewhat unsafe to turn into I have concerns about this Online Very narrow - Cannot be shared between pedestrians and bicyclists simultaneously. I have concerns about this Online Same comment posted on pedestrian map. Drivers turning west on University do not respect the WALK light. Many times they turn in front of me on bike or walking/running. Possible "solution": When walk light is activated, the traffic light should remain RED! I have concerns about this Online Page 57 of 67 Sticker # (In-Person Meeting Comments Only) Comments Type Input Type Southwest Parkway is a bike route, but is not safe. Signage needs to be more noticieble, more frequent along the corridor, and give uninformed vehicle drivers and cyclists more education about the right of way. For example. "Cyclists can use full lane" would be nice since there is not a bike lane. I have concerns about this Online *waves cane* I remember when there wasn't a left turn for bikes here and it sucked. Thank you so much for putting a left turn lane for bikes here. *Modified for inappropriate language*I like this Online I love this bridge. It was life changing when I lived in CS I like this Online There's a bit of sidewalk here that's just enough of a bump that if your bike is light enough and you go fast enough it feels like you might catch some air and I love it I like this Online Anywhere y'all want to build a shared use paths is fine by me! I LOVE using them!!I like this Online yes please! more multi use paths!I like this Online proposed path will be excellent addition to the City's recreation opportunities I like this Online connecting this to Reatta Meadows would be great!I like this Online I really hope this proposed path along bee creek is created in my lifetime. I like this Online College Station and Bryan need to cooperate on a multi-use path and bridge over Burton Creek. This is the only existing route from north College Station to Bryan, and it's dangerous with a narrow, turning, low-visibility, high-speed road in 29th Street.I like this Online yes please bring this path to life! even a minimal gravel path would work for me.I like this Online love that this path was created!! the finish around the field will make it perfect/I like this Online This would be great because there is not a good long walking/biking path that is not in the street in the nearby neighborhoods.I like this Online It would be nice to have another trail here, esp. if it goes under HWY 6.I like this Online I like that these neighborhoods and new park will be connected to a well used trail I like this Online cycling on the street would be safer than using the shared use path, as the cyclist would then have right-of-way instead of having to use so much caution at each of the street crossings along ws phillips through castlegate ii I like this Online A multi use on Harvey would be so great. Especially if it connected to university before hwy 6.I like this Online Page 58 of 67 Sticker # (In-Person Meeting Comments Only) Comments Type Input Type This shared use trail connecting harvey and university after veterans park would make me love college station!!!I like this Online Please put this awesome trail in. I would cry tears of joy and walk/bike/run it every day. I could even use it to get to work I think.I like this Online I agree with the other person. We need a lane connecting B and CS. They wrote it better than I.I like this Online This would be sick I like this Online This rural loop proposal would be awesome. I used to live out here and could have commuted to work would it been there. If it goes in now, ill bike it recreationally I like this Online 1 Biking to the new independence park along RP from fitch Route I Would Like To Bike In-Person 2 I have nearly been hit by a right turning car every time i have crossed TX northbound. Crossing southbound, left turning cars will keep going after the red, then right turning cars will take over, so the entire time the ped signal is on, its been taken by turning cars. Route I Would Like To Bike In-Person 3 NC Route I Would Like To Bike In-Person 7 put an underpass or overpass at holleman and hwy 6 to switch station road to appomattox to east harvey road to avoid crossing under hwy 6 at harvey (east and west) Route I Would Like To Bike In-Person 8 I would love holleman and southwest to be a little safer for bikes! Route I Currently Bike In-Person Bike Route Comments - Draw A Route You Currently Bike or Would Like To Bike Page 59 of 67 Sticker # (In-Person Meeting Comments Only) Comments Type Input Type 13 On lick creek greenway, there are two areas that need to be improved for bikes. The first and main one is the undercrossing under midtown road. Whenever it rains the water builds up there and with enough rain it becomes muddy and impassable for bikes and peds. The city just finished a major project there, but didnt fix that issue. I was very surprised at that! Some type of raised grate would work. Route I Would Like To Bike In-Person 14 More access and safer parking in major city centers. Things like grocery stores would be somewhere I'd like to cycle to more often. Cycling is NOT just exercise or sport, it can be a main source of transportation. Route I Would Like To Bike In-Person 15 When riding north along the east side of hwy 6, there are basically two ways to get from south to north. 1, via booneville/30, and 2. back streets, with a short section on the frontage road between raintree and horse haven. However, in the southbound direction its impossible to make the connection between horse haven and raintree, which makes booneville/30 the only option. By adding a short connector between these two streets it would open up this whole route and make it much safer! Route I Currently Bike In-Person 15 Route I Would Like To Bike In-Person 17 NC Route I Would Like To Bike In-Person 19 Bike lane combines car lane where people mostly turn right, its hard to go straight. Route I Currently Bike In-Person 19 Bike lane on university drive from lincoln to summerglen to improve access to BSW clinic at 1700 university Route I Would Like To Bike In-Person 20 NC Route I Would Like To Bike In-Person Page 60 of 67 Sticker # (In-Person Meeting Comments Only) Comments Type Input Type 26 I park at elmo weeden and hwy 30 and bike fo amarillo national bank. I would like to bike down elmo weeden but hwy 30 is a bit too dangerous in the mornings as is elmo weeden If university had a separated/protected bike lane, I’d feel more comfortable on that road. Many of my friends bike from around TAMU to veterans Route I Currently Bike In-Person 30 Bee creek area steets can get kind of rough on a bike but lanes down to south college station are pretty good! Route I Currently Bike In-Person 32 Walking or biking from arrington road traffic circle further on private drive C into HEB parking lot there are not helpful ramps if you are using sidewalks. For example, if you need to cross private drive from other side you have to bike off the curb. But there are many terrible spots. Route I Currently Bike In-Person 38 I live off of hardy weedon and bike to commute once or twice a week to TAMU. I would like a protected shared use path/bike lane on hwy 30. Also, a protected lane on university between hwy 30 and hwy 6. the traffic moves really fast here and the lane can feel unsafe! I do enjoy my bike commute, and these changes would go a long way towards making me feel more safe. Route I Currently Bike In-Person 39 More access and safer parking in major city centers. Things like grocery stores would be somewhere I'd like to cycle to more often. Cycling is NOT just exercise or sport, it can be a main source of transportation. Route I Currently Bike In-Person 41 Rock prairie west to longmire Route I Currently Bike In-Person 42 NC Route I Currently Bike In-Person Page 61 of 67 Sticker # (In-Person Meeting Comments Only) Comments Type Input Type 49 Most of the route i bike is well paved as i mainly commute from my apartment near campus to classes. I feel much safer biking on campus than off campus. Even though there are sidewalks along texas ave, i will usually drive to places along texas ave because its safer. I would bike more in CS if i felt like it was safe Route I Currently Bike In-Person 53 Rock prairie at welsh and victoria is a disconnect that needs to be addressed in order for this corridor to be effective. Route I Currently Bike In-Person 54 Rock prairie at welsh and victoria is a disconnect that needs to be addressed in order for this corridor to be effective. Route I Currently Bike In-Person 64 Harvey mitchell and southwest are annoying to cross. They add 1-2 minutes or more if you get caught at the light. Welsh is decent, and i could see it being a major cycling corridor if made safer and more appealing. Separated lanes and more shade would go a long way to making routes more appealing. Route I Currently Bike In-Person 73 After a heavy rain, sand and soil wash onto the path at this curve and it becomes hazardous riding a bike through there. Some type of barrier should be built. Route I Would Like To Bike In-Person 74 Connect north forrest road/switch station to nunn jones to allow access to rural east side Route I Would Like To Bike In-Person 85 This route is to shopping at jones crossing. The circle i drew at wellborn and rock prairie has very poor bike options. There is a path west of wellborn road on RP but there is no path to the east. Theres a multiuse path north on wellborn but it has some unsafe intersections. Route I Would Like To Bike In-Person 86 There is a nice shared use path on the otherside of hwy 6 here, but this intersection is hard to navigate safely on bike or walking Route I Would Like To Bike In-Person Page 62 of 67 Sticker # (In-Person Meeting Comments Only) Comments Type Input Type 62 and 48 Riding in the neighborhood streets is usually okay, sometimes people drive fast. Sharrows would help remind drivers that people bike here. Only needed on highest bike traffic roads (bike routes) Crossing major roads can be tough All along this route there are lights that don’t automatically detect cyclists despite there being bike lanes before and after the lights. This seems like a no-brainer to me. I also design this route to have as many bike paths as possible but am disappointed that they are only built in parks and don’t extend or connect beyond. Route I Currently Bike In-Person Would love to see safer crossing for Harvey Mitchell, there are kids who cross here alone to get to school. Route I Currently Bike Online Glade should have no parking for cars or raised barrier. So many kids cycle to school here alone and could use the extra safety. Route I Currently Bike Online Look I got places to go and everything is on Texas Ave Route I Currently Bike Online I bike this way to drop off my kindergartener every school day. Route I Currently Bike Online I bike from RP elementary to AMCHS to go to work every morning Route I Currently Bike Online love th epath through park to library, super fun with the kids Route I Currently Bike Online bridges over creeks are cool features Route I Currently Bike Online love the greenways Route I Currently Bike Online lick creek greenway and park are awesome Route I Currently Bike Online The way I get to campus Route I Currently Bike Online Page 63 of 67 Sticker # (In-Person Meeting Comments Only) Comments Type Input Type so many people that live at ucenter bike to zach. They just take up the space in the parking lot, but with that lot being bought out, there might not be space on the road for them to continue bike commuting Route I Currently Bike Online Would love if university had some bike lanes/traffic calming. I would love to sit outside carport coffee, or the zachbucks, be able to study outside in peace without the hearing the revving of an engine. University is so noisy, and so many businesses would be so much more appealing if this was more pedestrian friendly. Route I Currently Bike Online Work Commute Route I Currently Bike Online Loop Route I Currently Bike Online Commute to/from work Route I Currently Bike Online Route home from Bryan Route I Currently Bike Online Route from home to Bryan Route I Currently Bike Online Common after-work route Route I Currently Bike Online Route home from southern College Station Route I Currently Bike Online Recreational route Route I Currently Bike Online HEB route Route I Currently Bike Online Recreational route Route I Currently Bike Online Page 64 of 67 Sticker # (In-Person Meeting Comments Only) Comments Type Input Type Alternate recreational route Route I Currently Bike Online Route to/from airport Route I Currently Bike Online Route to/from Bryan Route I Currently Bike Online Starbucks route Route I Currently Bike Online Hopdoddy route Route I Currently Bike Online current commute to work. Glade feels safe to bike on. Wide street and cars give space. Route I Currently Bike Online excercise route. wellborn and the roads around millican often don't have wide enough shoulders. can be scary when a huge dually blows smoke past you. Route I Currently Bike Online home to work route Route I Currently Bike Online home to grocery store Route I Currently Bike Online This is a pleasant bike other than Hardy Weedon and highway 30. If we could get a bike lane on Hardy Weeden that'd be awesome. Route I Currently Bike Online Route to work Route I Currently Bike Online Route to MSC (meeting spot) Route I Currently Bike Online This is a popular route for local cyclists. Route I Currently Bike Online Page 65 of 67 Sticker # (In-Person Meeting Comments Only) Comments Type Input Type Glade is a sketchy route option during times of hte day where there is heavy vehicular traffic and cars parked on both sides of the street. This section has so much potential to be a safe, easy to navigate major bike connector. Consider restricting parking to one side of the street. Route I Currently Bike Online Connects walking path to both sides of wellborn rd Route I Would Like To Bike Online I would like to bike down this portion of Rock Prairie Road Safely. Cars refuse to share the road, and the sidewalks are too narrow to share with pedestrians. Route I Would Like To Bike Online There should be a way for peds/bikes to get along Wellborn Route I Would Like To Bike Online Would cut Bryan biking time by five minutes Route I Would Like To Bike Online Would complete a rural loop Route I Would Like To Bike Online Too dangerous to ride Route I Would Like To Bike Online Need some way to get from Indian Lakes to South College Station that doesn't involve dangerous Arrington Route I Would Like To Bike Online Need more bike lanes/side walks Route I Would Like To Bike Online I ride these roads often for excercise, but it is pretty sketchy without any existing infrastructure. I'm just riding on the tiny shoulder. Route I Would Like To Bike Online It would be nice to have the trails in this park loop. It would also give better access to the shops on Arrington Rd. Route I Would Like To Bike Online This appears to be wide enough for a trail. Route I Would Like To Bike Online continuation of the existing George Bush Dr W bike lanes Route I Would Like To Bike Online Page 66 of 67 Sticker # (In-Person Meeting Comments Only) Comments Type Input Type SW Parkway bike lane (would greatly increase cyclist mobility & safety) Route I Would Like To Bike Online Hardy Weedon/Hwy 30 feel unsafe to bike in the morning Route I Would Like To Bike Online The all weather crossing along this path keeps washing out. Additionally the surface is very rough and washing away. Route I Would Like To Bike Online The surface is very uncomfortable to ride on and the drainage crossings are washing out. Route I Would Like To Bike Online Page 67 of 67