HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/22/2010 - Regular Agenda Packet - Design Review BoardTable of Contents
Agenda
..2
Hunter Goodwin
Hunter Goodwin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 4
August 27, 2010
August 27, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 5
Presentation, possible action, and discussion on an amendment
to the City of College Station Color Palette to add "Aggie
Maroon" as an approved color. Case #10-00500211 (JP)
Staff memo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 8
Presentation, possible action and discussion on a site plan,
landscape plan, building elevations, signage, and variances
regarding alternative architectural relief elements and substitute
building materials for the Wolf Pen Creek Festival Park located
at the intersection of Holleman Drive and Dartmouth Street.
Case# 10-00500198 (LH)
Staff Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 9
Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 13
1
0-1-4- ()I- C,G S-r:vrxr
Home of Tmu AC 111 (inivenrin.,
1. Call to Order
AGENDA
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
Friday, October 22, 2010, 11:30 AM
Council Chambers
College Station City Hall
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas, 77840
2. Consideration, discussion and possible action on Absence Requests.
Hunter Goodwin
3. Consideration, discussion and possible action to approve meeting Minutes.
August 27, 2010
4. Presentation, possible action, and discussion on an amendment to the City of College
Station Color Palette to add "Aggie Maroon" as an approved color. Case #10-00500211
(J P)
5. Presentation, possible action and discussion on a site plan, landscape plan, building
elevations, signage, and variances regarding alternative architectural relief elements and
substitute building materials for the Wolf Pen Creek Festival Park located at the
intersection of Holleman Drive and Dartmouth Street. Case# 10-00500198 (LH)
6. Possible action and discussion on future agenda items - A Design Review Board Member
may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific
factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation
shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent
meeting.
7. Adjourn.
2
Notice is hereby given that a Regular Meeting of the Design Review Board of the City
of College Station, Texas will be held on the Friday, October 22, 2010 at 11:30 a.m.,
City Hall Council Chambers,1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas. The
following subjects will be discussed, to wit: See Agenda
Posted this the --day of__--_-_-_-_, 2010 at _p.m.
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
Sherry Mashburn, City Secretary
By
I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the above Notice of Meeting of the Design
Review Board of the City of College Station, Texas, is a true and correct copy of said
Notice and that I posted a true and correct copy of said notice on the bulletin board at
City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, in College Station, Texas, and the City's website,
www.cstx.aov. The Agenda and Notice are readily accessible to the general public at
all times. Said Notice and Agenda were posted on2010 and remained so
posted continuously for at least 72 hours preceding the scheduled time of said
meeting.
This public notice was removed from the official posting board at the College Station
City Hall on the following date and time: - by
Dated this day of-_-_--__, 2010.
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
By,
Subscribed and sworn to before me on this the day of--_--__-__, 2010.
Notary Public- Brazos County, Texas
My commission expires:
This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any
request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To
make arrangements call (979) 764-3517 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. Agendas may be
viewed on www.cstx.ciov.
3
(*tl""
CITY OF COLLEGE STA-I-ION
PI aurriraSf c~ • I)eneln firrirnt .Ser•r~irc;r
Absence Request Form
For Elected and Appointed Officers
Name Hunter Goodwin
Request Submitted on
Date: 10/12/10
I will not be in attendance at the meeting of
for the reason(s) specified:
I will be out of town.
10/22/10
(Date)
Email Hunter Goodwin
Signature
This request shall be submitted to Mandi Alford one week prior to
meeting date. Fax 764-3496. City of College Station, 1101 Texas Avenue,
College Station, Texas 77840
4
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Planning & Development Services
Minutes
Design Review Board
Friday, August 27, 2010, 11:00 AM
Administrative Conference Room
1101 Texas Ave
College Station, Texas, 77840
Board Members Present: Chairman Scott Shafer, Jason Kinnard, Alan King, and Hunter
Goodwin
Board Members Absent: Ward Wells, Katy Jackson
Staff Present: Senior Planner Jennifer Prochazka, Staff Planner Matthew
Hilgemeier and Staff Assistant Mandi Alford
Others Present: Kristy Tornga
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1: Call to order.
Chairman Shaffer called the meeting to order at 11:25 am
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2:
Consideration, discussion and possible action on absence
request.
Ward Wells, Katy Jackson for the August 27, 2010 meeting.
Alan King motioned to approve the absence requests; Hunter Goodwin seconded the motion
which passed unopposed (4-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Consideration, discussion and possible action to approve
meeting minutes for June 11, 2010.
Hunter Goodwin motioned to approve the meeting minutes, Alan King seconded the motion
which passed unopposed (4-0).
5
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a variance
request from the Non-Residential Architectural Standards' approved color palette for a
proposed freestanding restaurant located at 4471 State Highway 6 South. Case # 10-
00500153 (MKH)
Staff Planner Matthew Hilgemeier presented the staff report stating that Whataburger is
proposing to construct a new freestanding structure near the intersection of William D. Fitch
Parkway and the State Highway 6 South Frontage Road. When constructed, the new structure
will be part of a building plot that has more than 150,000 gross square feet of floor area.
Section 7.9.f.5 of the Unified Development Ordinance requires that when a building is part of
a building plot with a gross area of 150,000 square feet or more, that accent colors may be
used on no more than 5% of the facade on which the accent color is applied. Accent colors
are those not included on the approved color palette.
This site is also located in the Overlay District, which requires that all building colors be
neutral and harmonious with the existing man-made or natural environment and states that
only compatible accent colors be used. The paint colors for the proposed Whataburger do not
match any colors that are currently utilized on the existing commercial development in the
area. However, the color and type of brick proposed for the new structure will match what is
currently used on the building already developed in this building plot. The requested color
scheme is a part of the Whataburger corporate brand and has been used at other locations
throughout Texas and in College Station.
Hunter Goodwin motioned to approve the Aggie Maroon color as proposed. Alan King
seconded the motion which passed unopposed (4-0).
Alan King motioned to approve the Whataburger Orange color as proposed. Jason Kinnard
seconded the motion which passed unopposed (4-0).
Alan King motioned to deny the use of the Whataburger White color as proposed; since there
are numerous variations of white that are on the approved color palette, Mr. Goodwin
requested the applicant to pick a white color that is in the approved color palette. Hunter
Goodwin seconded the motion which passed unopposed (4-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5: Possible action and discussion on future agenda items - A
Design Review Board Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not
been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing
policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject
on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
Hunter Goodwin suggested adding the trademark color Aggie Maroon to the approved color
palette.
6
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7:
Adjourn
Hunter Goodwin motioned to adjourn the meeting; Jason Kinnard seconded the motion
which passed unopposed (4-0). The meeting was adjourned at 12:10.
APPROVED:
Scott Shafer, Chairman
ATTEST:
Mandi Alford, Staff Assistant
7
(*t1q"
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Planning & Development Services
1101 Texas Avenue South, P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 14, 2010
TO: Members of the Design Review Board
FROM: Jennifer Prochazka, AICP, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: Amendment to the Color Palette
Item: Presentation, possible action, and discussion on an amendment to the City of College Station Color
Palette to add "Aggie Maroon" as an approved color.
Unified Development Ordinance Section 7.9.6.4 "Building Colors" states that all building facades and
roofs shall consist of only colors from the Color Palette approve by the City Council as amended by the
DRB and maintained in the office of the Administrator. All other colors are considered accent colors.
On August 27, 2010, the Board requested a future agenda item to consider amending the Color Palette
to incorporate Pantone® Aggie Maroon, a trademark color for Texas A&M University, as a permitted
color.
Because Aggie Maroon is a custom ink, there is no "PMS number" to refer to and "Aggie Maroon" is not
found in a standard Pantone Swatch Library. The ink formula for Pantone® Aggie Maroon is as follows:
Pantone Yellow 012 = 9.00
Pantone Rubine Red = 36.00
Pantone Black = 25.00
Pantone Trans. White = 30.00
8
(*tl""
CiTYO C0H,I;,GI`, STATION
Horne of Texas A6-M University,
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
for
COCS Wolf Pen Creek Festival Park
10-00500198
REQUEST: Site development including building, water feature, path
extension, landscaping, signage, and variance requests to
Section 7.9.B.2 "Building Mass and Design" and Section 7.9.B.3
"Building Materials" of the Unified Development Ordinance
SCALE: 10.41 acres
LOCATION: 1015 Colgate Drive, generally located at the intersection of
Holleman Drive and Dartmouth Street
ZONING DISTRICT: WPC Wolf Pen Creek
APPLICANTS: Donald Harmon, City of College Station
PROJECT MANAGER: Lauren A. Hovde, Staff Planner
Ihovde@cstx.gov
RECOMMENDATION: Staff is not providing a recommendation for the request since the
proposal is a City of College Station project.
Design Review Board Page 1 of 3
October 22, 2010
9
Design Review Board
October 22, 2010
Page 2 of 3
10
ITEM SUMMARY: The proposal includes an addition to the existing Wolf Pen Creek Park
facility. The subject property is bordered by public rights-of-way on three sides, Holleman Drive
to the north, Dartmouth Street to the west, and Colgate Drive to the south. It is neighbored by
the Arts Council of Brazos Valley building to the south. The project consists of three structures
including a restroom, equipment room, and an arbor. These buildings will be oriented around a
large water feature that is planned as a site amenity. The architectural design and materials
mimic other buildings within the Wolf Pen Creek Park. Parking is provided off the proposed fire
lane/drive-aisle connecting Dartmouth Street and Colgate Drive. In addition to the water feature
area, an extension of the path network is proposed and will include resting areas with benches
and trash receptacles.
The site plan and elevations meet all standards of the Unified Development Ordinance with the
exception of two variance requests to Section 7.9 of the Unified Development Ordinance. The
first request is to Section 7.9.B.3 to allow substitute building materials in order to use
sandblasted concrete. Though this product has been used on other Park buildings, it is not a
pre-approved material and must be granted by the Design Review Board. The second variance
request is to Section 7.9.B.2. for consideration of alternative architectural relief elements
including the distinctive roof design and relief area next to the concrete columns.
ITEM BACKGROUND: Design began for the Festival Park, which will be funded by the Wolf
Pen Creek Tax Increment Fund, after City Council approved a contract with Clark Condon
Associates for a Master Plan on October 8, 2009. During the months that followed, the plan
underwent many renditions and various alternatives, but was narrowed down to a single option
in late 2009 entitled Wolf Pen Creek Water Feature and Festival Area Project. The Design
Review Board met with the Wolf Pen Creek Oversight Committee on March 9, 2010 as an
opportunity to provide their suggestions and comments regarding the proposal. The plans have
changed slightly since this meeting due to budget constraints and the elaboration of design by
the Wolf Pen Creek Oversight Committee.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff is not providing a recommendation for the request since the proposal is a City of College
Station project.
ITEMS FOR REVIEW:
1. Treatment of the minimum reservation area: The majority of the site is left as open space to
accommodate the path network, as well as future festival activities.
2. Exterior lighting: The applicant is proposing to use light fixtures currently utilized by Parks
and Recreation Department in the Wolf Pen Creek District.
3. Solid waste: Trash receptacles will be located throughout the building site and path network.
4. Relationship of buildings to site: The proposed buildings are located at the rear of the
property leaving the front portion as open space.
5. Relationship of buildings and site to adjoining area: The buildings are setback several acres
from the Holleman Drive right-of-way and will be accessible by vehicle from Dartmouth
Street and Colgate Drive. The proposed paths will tie into the existing network within the
previously developed section of the park.
6. Building design: In general, the buildings are a combination of burnished block CMU
simulating granite, stucco, and sandblasted concrete.
Design Review Board
October 22, 2010
Page 3 of 3
11
7. Miscellaneous structures and street hardware: In addition to the three proposed buildings,
the applicant is proposing a water feature and a path extension that includes public benches
and waste facilities.
8. Landscaping: Landscaping is provided in accordance with the Unified Development
Ordinance. The majority of landscaping is existing on site, however, new plants are being
added around the proposed buildings.
9. Signage: The applicant is requesting a freestanding sign to be located between the
proposed restroom and equipment building which will be visible from Dartmouth Street and
Colgate Drive. It will also be visible from Holleman, but most likely not highly legible. The
sign will use colors and materials found on the proposed building with silver lettering.
REQUESTED VARIANCEs TO NON-RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS:
Substitute Building Material- Section 7.9.G.1 allows the Design Review Board to
consider a material that has not been previously approved by Section 7.9.B.3 if it meets
one of the following criteria:
a. The building material is a new or innovative material manufactured that has not
been previously available to the market or the material is not listed as an allowed
or prohibited material;
b. The material is similar and comparable in quality and appearance to the
materials allowed in Section 7.9;
c. The material is an integral part of a themed building (example 50's diner in
chrome).
2. Alternative Architectural Relief Elements- Section 7.9.G.5 allows the Design Review
Board to consider alternatives to the options listed in Section 7.9.B.2 if the alternative
incorporates a minimum of two architectural relief elements with spacing as required by
Section 7.9.B.2.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS:
1. Application
2. Site plan (provided in packet)
3. Elevations of building facades (provided in packet)
4. Sign details (provided in packet)
Design Review Board
October 22, 2010
Page 4 of 3
12
(*hr"
C1'r1 l)I COI.I_WI--S'T T1UN
Hours Ie.accAu'~hl U,uiusiry~`
FOR OFFICESE
CASE NO.
t ,
DATE SUBMITI ED' .
TIME
STAFF
DESIGN REVD BOARD APPLICATION
WOLF PEN CREEK DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
(Check all that apply. Note: All items checked must be presented to the Design Review Board at the
same time): H Site Plan / Building E] Building Y Sign
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
. -,$250--Design-Review Beard °A~ppiication ee. 0 c .,5 J-
Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used
and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
For Site Plan / Building consideration:
...._$668..Site 1?.laaa..Appticatior Feo. :,.F ' rs v x /A/.' c r
U_.___4600-(minimum) Development Permit--Appii-cation /,Public Infrastructure Review-and Inspection Fee. Fee i-s
0,751n_of..acceptabl-e-Engineer's Estimate-#or---public-infrastructure; $60 minimum (if fee-is- $600, the-
.balance-,is-due- .prior.-to--the-issuance-of-any plans or.-development perrnit7. , lg F V, f
._$25D,.Nan Residentia.l.Architectural-Standards Building Review Application Fee (if applicable),
EX] Fourteen (14) folded copies of site plan.'
2] One (1) folded copy of the landscape plan.
L,XJ One (1) copy of the following for building review (if applicable).
Building elevations for all buildings.
A list of building materials for all facade and screening.
Color samples for all buildings or list colors to be used from the approved color palette.
Two (2) copies of the grading, drainage, and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report.
Two (2) copies of the public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable).
Q Notice of Intent (NOI) if disturbed area is greater than five (5) acres cumulatively. L
The attached Site Plan and Non-Residential Architectural Standards Building Review checklists (if
applicable) with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not check off.
For Building consideration:
[]_.__-;250_Non-Residential--Architect-ural_Standards Buitdi-ng-Review Application-Fee(if applicable}:
One (1) copy of building elevations for all buildings.
A list of building materials for all facades and screening.
Color samples for all buildings or list colors to be used from the approved color palette.
( The attached Non-Residential Architectural Standards Building Review checklist with all items checked off
or a brief explanation as to why they are not checked off (if applicable).
For Sign consideration:
El Ten (10) copies of sign details with dimensions.
Ten (10) copies of the building elevation showing sign placement (if attached signage is proposed).
Ten (10) copies of color samples.
a~
Material samples.
NOTE: Proposed development in Wolf Pen Creek must be reviewed by the Design Review Board. When staff has
completed their technical review of the proposal, it will be scheduled for consideration by the Design Review
Board. Ten (10) copies of all current design plans and color samples will be required for the Board.
1/10
Page 1 of 11
13
Date of Optional Preapplication or Storrnwater Management Conference
NAME OF PROJECT Wolf Pen Creek Festival Park
ADDRESS 1015 Colgate Drive College Station TX, 77840
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision) 10.41 acre tract, volume 1673, paqe 215
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
-Amdrow-i4 yl
Name E-mail akonyha@clarlccondon:cor,
Street Address -40401 Steffa-Link-R ad °
City ruloust~rr` -
- ~ State , Texas Zip Code 7.70-
Phone Number -7-13-.-8744'414- '5 C- r ° Fax Number 7 :874 8
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name
Y E-mail
C;L
Street Address
City
Phone Number
Proposed use of property City park and festival venue.
Fax Number
Zip Code
Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? Yes (X No
Square footage of attached sign
Square footage of freestanding sign 32.5 square feet
For Site Plan consideration, describe how the following proposed elements meet the goals of the special district plan and
related regulations:
Site Lighting:
The proposed site lighting will replicate the fixtures used within the existing park and trail system.
Solid Waste:
There is no solid waste collection point proposed for this project. The waste collection will be conducted by CoCS
Parks Department.
Relationship of building(s) to site:
The height and scale of the buildings are compatible and harmonious with other park buildings within Wolf Pen Creek
Pan< and the adjacent Art Center facility.
Relationship of building(s) and site to adjoining areas:
Proposed buildings incorporate building materials and shapes that are compatible with the building materials and
shapes of existing park buildings within Wolf Pen Creek Park and the adjacent Art Center facility.
Building footprint design:
Low maintenance materials have been selected that are harmonious with other buildings within Wolf Pend Creek Park
and the adjacent Art Center facility. All mechanical equipment is screened from public view.
1/10
State
14
Page 2 of 11
Miscellaneous structures and street hardware:
The interior plaza space is shaded by two arbors. These arbors are constructed with similar materials used in the
building construction. The arbors have sconce lighting on the columns that will illuminate the interior plaza space,
Landscaping:
The landscaping will use native/adaptive material and will compliment the existing palette within the park. There is an
interactive water feature that can be used for recreation. The water feature also has a choreographed show mode.
Site Maintenance:
The landscape planting will be low maintenance. CoCS will be supplied comprehensive water feature maintenance
instructions and training at start up (end of construction).
For Building consideration, describe how the following proposed elements meet the goals of the special district plan and
related regulations:
Building Lighting:
Proposed building lighting is minimal. Fixtures have been selected that are compatible and hanmonious with existing
building lighting within Wolf Pen Creek Park, the adjacent Art Center facility and character of the proposed project.
Solid Waste Screening:
There is no solid waste collection point proposed for this project. The waste collection will be conducted by CoCS
Parks Department.
Relationship of building(s) to site:
The height and scale of the buildings are compatible and harmonious with other park buildings within Wolf Pen Creek
Park and the adjacent Art Center facility.
Relationship of building(s) and site to adjoining areas:
Proposed buildings incorporate building materials and shapes that are compatible with the building materials and
shapes of existing park buildings within Wolf Pen Creek Pan< and the adjacent Art Center facility.
Building design:
The curved restroom and fountain equipment buildings flank the main entry portal to the elliptical plaza that contains the
interactive fountain, the centerpiece and main attraction of the proposed Wolf Pen Creek Park expansion.
Maintenance (as related to Building design):
Low maintenance materials such as sandblasted concrete, burnished CMU and standing seam metal roofing have been
selected that are harmonious with other buildings within Wolf Pend Creek Park and the adjacent Art Center facility.
For Sign consideration, describe how the following proposed elements meet the goals of the special district plan and
related regulations:
Signs:
The proposed sign is designed in a manner that it appears as an integral part of the building architecture (although it is
freestanding). The colors of the metal elements will be similar (if not the same) as those of the building.
1/10
Page 3 of 11
15
Maintenance.
Low maintenance materials such as sandblasted concrete columns and galvanized, painted steel have been selected.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,
correct, and complete,
gnature and title 'Aj hee J . Date
1/10
Page 4 of 11
16
CERTIFICATION REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT
Owner Certification:
'1. No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued.
2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein.
3. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re-issued.
4. Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued.
5. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance.
6. Other permits may be required to fulfill local, state, and federal requirements. Owner will obtain or show
compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction.
7. If required, Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab
pre-pour) and post construction.
.8. Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify
compliance,
9. If, stormwater mitigation is required, including detention ponds proposed as part of this project, it shall be
designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
10. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken
to insure that all debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or
existing drainage facilities. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to
and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the
City of College Station shall apply.
11. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the
current requirernents of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines Technical Specifications, and Standard Details. All development has been designed in
accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal
Regulations.
12. Release of plans to (name or firm) is authorized for bidding purposes
only. I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on
contractor signature on approved Development Permit.
13. I, THE OWNER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR
THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND
ACCURATE.
Property Owner(s). Date
- x
.t:
w r, _ r
Engineer Certification:
1. The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds, proposed as part
of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence,
2. -1 -will-obtain or can show-.compliance.with all_necessary-Local,_State and Federal Permits prior to construction._
3. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances
of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations.
4. I, THE ENGINEER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND
ACCURATE,
Engineer Date
1/10
Page 5 of 11
17
t1q"
(,r'I'Y OF COI L GE S'l''MION
Home of fi.wo A6'Al Uninerjh),'
10401 Stella Link Rd.
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
U $250 Design Review Board Application Fee.
❑ Application completed in full. This application farm provided by the City of College Station must be used
and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
❑ Ten (10) copies of all alternative color/material schemes the chain or franchise has used (if applicable).
❑ Ten (10) copies of a letter from a licensed engineer or architect (if applicable).
❑ Ten (10) copies of the site plan showing the requested parking lot concept plan (if applicable).
❑ Additional materials may be required of the applicant such as material samples, elevations, site plans, and
landscaping plans. The applicant shall be informed of any extra materials required.
Date of Optional Preapplication Conference
NAME OF PROJECT Wolf Pen Creek Festival Park - -
ADDRESS 105 Col ate Drlve Collet/o Station 7784
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision) 10.41 acre tract, volume 167,3, page 275 _
APPLICANT°/PR(OJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name Andrew Konyha
Street Address
City Houston
Phone Number 718.871.1414
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
r t v
Name
Street Address
City
Phone Number
Current zoning _
Applicable ordinance section
10/09
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION
APPEALS WAIVERS NON-RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO.: to - a3_1
DATE SUBMITTED: ° G.
TIME:
STAFF: a
E-mail akonyha@clarkcondon.com
State TX
Zip Code 77025
Fax Number 718.871.0888
State
f
E-mail
Pax Number
Zip Code
d/seeking waiver from:
Page: 1 of 3
18
NON-RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS APPEALS / AID/ REQUEST
1. The following specific alternative to / waiver from the ordinance is requested:
2. The unnecessary hardship(s) involved by meeting the provisions of the ordinance other than financial hardship
is/are:
Sandblasted cancrate does naf appear to be sl~eciflcaliy aliower~ sir prohibited y the c~reirrance. Intayral colored
sandblasted concrete using the same cement and aggregate formulation as the burnished face CMU is selected for
the columns and lintels for this project because it provides color and texture hannony with the walls of the proposed
structures and well as the existing structures in the Wolf Pen Creek Park site and is durable and low maintonce.
3. The following alternatives to the requested appeal/waiver are possible:
Stucco wauid be an alternative IiuF cost would be greater, it wor~lef be a less durable material arrcl hnve higher
maintenance.
IN ADDITION, ANSWER THE FOLLOWING AS APPLICABLE (see the Unified Development Ordinance Section 7.9
Non-Residential Architectural Standards for more information):
For the substitution of building materials, answer at least one of the following:
1. Describe how the building material is a new or innovative material that has not been previously available to the
market or verifv that the material is not listed as an allowed or prohibited material.
ntegral co arec! sandblasted concrete does not appear to e specifically al owed or profrlbited by the ®rdinarrce.
l~lrotos of sandblasted concrete columns similar to those proposed and the relationship with burnished CMU wa!!s
is attached for reference.
9 IZxniain how the material is similar and comparable in quality and appearance to the allowed materials.
Integral colored sanr lasted concrete us ng the same camerrt atld aggregate ormulaPion as the burnisl7a ace
CMU is selected for the columns and lintels for this project because it provides color and texture harmony with the
walls of the proposed structures and well as the existing structures in the Wolf Pet) Creek Park site. Color sample
of the ro rosed CMU that the sandblasted concrete will match is included in the materials board.
hxniain hnw the material is an integral part of a themed building (e.g., chrome on a 1950's-type diner).
Integral colored sand lasted concrete using the same cement and aggregate fonnu anon as the units ed face
CMU is selected for the columns and lintels for this project because it provides color and texture harmony with the
walls of the proposed structures and well as the existing structures In the Wolf Pen Creek Park site. Colorsample of
the ro used CMU that the sandblasted concrete wilt match is included in the materials board.
For alternative materials on facade work on an existing building, answer the following:
1 1vrdnin %A/hv tht-Alowed materials cannot be utilized without a structural alteration to the existing building.
..-IIf-....... .-..J
V A.
2. Provide copies of a letter from a licensed engineer or architect verifying that a structural alteration is required to
apply the permitted facade materials to the building.
10/09
Page 2 of 3
19