No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/14/2008 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning Commission ÐÔßÒÒ×ÒÙ ú ÆÑÒ×ÒÙ ÝÑÓÓ×ÍÍ×ÑÒ ß«¹«­¬ ïìô îððè êæðð ÐÓ Ý·¬§ Ø¿´´ ݱ«²½·´ ݸ¿³¾»®­ ïïðï Ì»¨¿­ ߪ»²«»ô ݱ´´»¹» ͬ¿¬·±²ô Ì»¨¿­ д¿²²·²¹ ú Ʊ²·²¹ ݱ³³·­­·±² Ó»»¬·²¹ ß«¹«­¬ ïìô îððè Ì¿¾´» ±º ݱ²¬»²¬­ ¢ ɱ®µ­¸±° ß¹»²¼¿ ¢ ÐúÆ Ð´¿² ±º ɱ®µòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòê ¢ ݱ²­»²¬ ß¹»²¼¿ ¢ ß¾­»²½» λ¯«»­¬­òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòïî Ö«´§ ïéô îððè ɱ®µ­¸±° ú λ¹«´¿® Ó»»¬·²¹ Ó·²«¬»­òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòïì Ю»´·³·²¿®§ д¿¬ º±® ̱©»® б·²¬òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòîì Ú·²¿´ д¿¬ º±® Ñ¿µ´¿²¼ η¼¹»òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòíî ¢ λ¹«´¿® ß¹»²¼¿ ¢ Ю»´·³·²¿®§ д¿¬ º±® Ù®¿¸¿³ α¿¼ ײ¼«­¬®·¿´ п®µòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòíé ÷ÔÏÜÑíÑÜÉ×ÎËíÎÎÕiÊíÜËÒòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòìë ݱ³°®»¸»²­·ª» д¿² ß³»²¼³»²¬ º±® Ý¿°­¬±²» ݱ¬¬¿¹»­ ¿¬ ÚÓ îèïèòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòëð Ø·­¬±®·½ Ю»­»®ª¿¬·±² Û²¿¾´·²¹ Ñ®¼·²¿²½»òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòêí AGENDA PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Workshop Meeting Thursday, August 14, 2008, at 6:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 1.Call the meeting to order. 2.Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. 3.Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the proposed Historic Preservation (MH) Enabling Ordinance. 4.Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update to the Commission on (JS) the status of items within the 2008 P&Z Plan of Work (see attached). 5.Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings. August 12, 2008 ~ Tree Preservation Meeting ~ City Hall Council Chambers ~ 5:30 p.m. August 18, 2008 ~ City Council Meeting ~ City Hall Council Chambers ~ 7:00 p.m. August 19, 2008 ~ CPAC Meeting ~ Conference Center ~ 5:30 p.m. August 21, 2008 ~ Planning & Zoning Meeting ~ City Hall Council Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. August 28, 2008 ~ City Council Meeting ~ City Hall Council Chambers ~ 7:00 p.m. October 1 - 4, 2008 ~ Galveston Convention Center ~ APA Conference 6.Presentation, discussion and possible action regarding the Comprehensive Planning process. 7.Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, CIP Bond Committee, Council Transportation Committee, Joint Bryan P&Z/College Station P&Z Committee on Common Gateways and Corridors, Joint Parks/Planning & Zoning Subcommittee, CSISD Rezoning Committee, CSISD Long Range Education Planning Committee. 8.Discussion and possible action regarding subcommittee appointments. 9.Discussion and possible action on future agenda items – A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 10.Adjourn. Consultation with Attorney {Gov't Code Section 551.071} ; possible action. The Planning and Zoning Commission may seek advice from its attorney regarding a pending and contemplated litigation subject or attorney- client privileged information. After executive session discussion, any final action or vote taken will be in public. If litigation or attorney-client privileged information issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, an executive session will be held. Notice is hereby given that a Workshop Meeting of the College Station Planning and Zoning Commission, College Station, Texas will be held on the Thursday, August 14, 2008 at 6:00 PM at the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas. The following subjects will be discussed, to wit: See Agenda. Posted this the _____ day of August, 2008, at _______ CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS By _____________________________ Connie Hooks, City Secretary I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the above Notice of the Workshop Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of College Station, Texas, is a true and correct copy of said Notice and that I posted a true and correct copy of said notice on the bulletin board at City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, in College Station, Texas, and the City’s website, www.cstx.gov. The Agenda and Notice are readily accessible to the general public at all times. Said Notice and Agenda were posted on August ___, 2008, at _______ and remained so posted continuously for at least 72 hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting. This public notice was removed from the official posting board at the College Station City Hall on the following date and time: ______________________ by _________________________. Dated this _____ day of_____________, 2008. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS By_____________________________ Subscribed and sworn to before me on this the day of_______________, 2008. Notary Public- Brazos County, Texas My commission expires: This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3517 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. Agendas may be viewed on www.cstx.gov. Planning and Zoning Commission meetings are broadcast live on Cable Access Channel 19. AGENDA PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting Thursday, August 14, 2008, at 7:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 1.Call meeting to order. Hear Citizens. 2. At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address the Commission on planning and zoning issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The citizen presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.) All matters listed under Item 3, Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Planning and Zoning Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. There will not be separate discussion of these items. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it will be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration. Consent Agenda 3.. 3.1Consideration, discussion and possible action on Absence Requests from meetings. John Nichols ~ August 14, 2008 ~ Workshop & Regular Thomas Woodfin ~ August 14, 2008 ~ Workshop & Regular 3.2Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting Minutes. July 17, 2008 ~ Workshop July 17, 2008 ~ Regular 3.3Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Preliminary Plat for Tower Point Subdivision consisting of 23 lots on 128.3 acres located at 951 William D. Fitch Parkway generally located at the northwest corner of William D. Fitch Case #08-00500153 (LB) Parkway and State Highway 6 South. 3.4Presentation, possible action, and discussion on the Oakland Ridge Phase 1 Final Plat for 39.873 acres off Jones-Butler Road and near Cain Road, adjacent to the Case #08-00500154. (LH) Las Palomas Subdivision. Regular Agenda 4.Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. 5.Presentation, possible action, and discussion on Variance Requests to Section 8-G.2, Relation to Adjoining Street Systems, and Section 8-J.2, Block Length of the Subdivision Regulations; and presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Preliminary Plat for Graham Road Industrial Park, consisting of 1 lot on 8.973 acres generally located along Case #08-00500150 (MR) Graham Road behind the Texas A&M Research Foundation. 6.Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat of Lots 1R and 2R, Block 2 of the Pooh's Park Subdivision Section One, being a replat of Lot 1, Block 2 of the Pooh's Park Subdivision Section One, consisting of 2.998 acres located at Case #08-00500103(MR) 300 Holleman Drive East. 7.Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an amendment to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan from Industrial / R & D, Single Family Residential Low Density, and Floodplain & Streams to Planned Development for 120.76 acres located at 1430 Harvey Mitchell Parkway generally located opposite the intersection with Case #08-500136 (JS) Holleman Drive. 8.Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on amendments to Chapter 12, City of College Station Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Ordinance Article 2 Development Review Bodies, Article 3 Development Procedures, Section 4.1 Establishment of Districts, Article 5 District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards, Article 10 Enforcement, and Section 11.2 Defined Terms as they relate to the Case creation of a Landmark Commission and Historic Preservation Overlay District. #08-00500001 (MH) 9.Discussion and possible action on future agenda items – A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 10.Adjourn. Consultation with Attorney {Gov't Code Section 551.071} ; possible action. The Planning and Zoning Commission may seek advice from its attorney regarding a pending and contemplated litigation subject or attorney- client privileged information. After executive session discussion, any final action or vote taken will be in public. If litigation or attorney-client privileged information issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, an executive session will be held. Notice is hereby given that a Regular Meeting of the College Station Planning and Zoning Commission, College Station, Texas will be held on the Thursday, August 14, 2008 at 7:00 PM at the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas. The following subjects will be discussed, to wit: See Agenda. Posted this the _____ day of August, 2008, at _______ CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS  By _____________________________ Connie Hooks, City Secretary I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the above Notice of Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of College Station, Texas, is a true and correct copy of said Notice and that I posted a true and correct copy of said notice on the bulletin board at City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, in College Station, Texas, and the City’s website, www.cstx.gov. The Agenda and Notice are readily accessible to the general public at all times. Said Notice and Agenda were posted on August___, 2008, at _______ and remained so posted continuously for at least 72 hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting. This public notice was removed from the official posting board at the College Station City Hall on the following date and time: ______________________ by _________________________. Dated this _____ day of_____________, 2008. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS By_____________________________ Subscribed and sworn to before me on this the day of_______________, 2008. Notary Public- Brazos County, Texas My commission expires: This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3517 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. Agendas may be viewed on www.cstx.gov. Planning and Zoning Commission meetings are broadcast live on Cable Access Channel 19.  Planning&ZoningCommission2008PlanofWork Active and Completed Items Community & Neighborhood Planning ComprehensivePlanPhase 2 éÇÏÏÛÊÃìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÛÈ×É ùÍÎÈÓÎÇÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÇÌØÛÈ×ÈÍùÍÏÌÊ×Ô×ÎÉÓÆ×ìÐÛÎ  òÍÓÎÈåÍÊÑÉÔÍÌÅÓÈÔùÍÇÎÙÓÐÖÍÊÏÓØÌÍÓÎÈÇÌØÛÈ× ìÔÛÉ× Ê×ÉÇÐÈÉÓÎÈÔ×ÖÍÊÏÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÙÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎÍÖÍÎùÍÏÌÊ×Ô×ÎÉÓÆ×ìÐÛÎ ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÉÈÔÛÈÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÈÔ×ÙÔÛÌÈ×ÊÉÍÊ   ùìûùÏ××ÈÓÎÕ ×Ð×Ï×ÎÈÉÍÖÈÔ×ùÍÏÌÊ×Ô×ÎÉÓÆ×ìÐÛÎ8/19/08:CPACmeeting éÈÛÖÖûÉÉÓÕÎ×ØòììøééÈÛÖÖûÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØùÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎ ÉÈëÇÛÊÈ×Ê  Annexation éÇÏÏÛÊÃìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÛÈ×É 9/4/08:tentative datethat nextround of potential ùÍÏÌÐ×È×ÛÎÎ×ÄÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×Ø×Ä×ÏÌÈÛÊ×ÛÉ ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÛÕÊ××Ï×ÎÈÉÛÎØÉ×ÊÆÓÙ×ÌÐÛÎ annexationareas will be presentedatP&Z workshop óØ×ÎÈÓÖÃÍÈÔ×ÊÛÊ×ÛÉÖÍÊÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ Ã×ÛÊÛÎÎ×ÄÛÈÓÍÎ 9/25/08:tentative datethat nextround of potential ÌÐÛÎÛÉØÓÊ×ÙÈ×ØÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ùÍÏÌÊ×Ô×ÎÉÓÆ×ìÐÛÎ annexationareas will be presentedtoCouncil éÈÛÖÖûÉÉÓÕÎ×ØðéùôóÈ×ÏùÍÏÌÐ×È×ØïÛÊÙÔ  ÉÈ×Ä×ÏÌÈÌÛÙÑÛÕ× NeighborhoodIntegrity éÇÏÏÛÊÃìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÛÈ×É 8/14/08:HistoricPreservationEnabling Ordinanceto be ùÍÇÎÙÓÐóÎÓÈÓÛÈÓÆ×íÚÈÛÓÎÉÈÛÑ×ÔÍÐØ×ÊÓÎÌÇÈÛÎØ presentedatP&Z workshopandregularmeeting 8/28/08:Council workshop item on neighborhood Õ×Î×ÊÛÐÙÍÎÙ×ÎÉÇÉÖÍÊÈÔ×ÖÍÊÏÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ× overlayfeeresolutionand percentages Î×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÓÎÈ×ÕÊÓÈÃÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙ 9/11/08:HistoricPreservationEnabling Ordinanceto be ÌÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×É presentedtoCouncil éÈÛÖÖûÉÉÓÕÎ×ØðúïôúùûÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØùÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎ ÉÈëÇÛÊÈ×Ê  CapitalImprovementProjects éÇÏÏÛÊÃìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÛÈ×É ùÍÇÎÙÓÐóÎÓÈÓÛÈÓÆ×óØ×ÎÈÓÖÃÙÛÌÓÈÛÐÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ× ìâåÍÊÑÉÔÍÌÓÈ×ÏÍÎÈÓÏ×ÐÓÎ×ÛÎØÌÊÍÕÊ×ÉÉÍÖ ÖÍÊÛÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐîÍÆ ÚÍÎØ×Ð×ÙÈÓÍÎÓÎÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÍÎ ùóìÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉ ÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ùÛÌÓÈÛÐóÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈìÊÍÕÊÛÏùÓÈÓÂ×Î  ìâÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØùóìûØÆÓÉÍÊÃùÍÏÏÓÈÈ×× ûØÆÓÉÍÊÃùÍÏÏÓÈÈ××ÛÎØÍÈÔ×ÊÖÇÈÇÊ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÛÉ Ê×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÊ×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØ×ØÈÍùÍÇÎÙÓÐ ØÓÊ×ÙÈ×ØÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ùÍÏÌÊ×Ô×ÎÉÓÆ×ìÐÛÎ ùÍÇÎÙÓÐÔ×ÛÊØÊ×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÛÈÓÍÎÉ éÈÛÖÖûÉÉÓÕÎ×ØùôïÛÊÑéÏÓÈÔûÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØùÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎ ÊØëÇÛÊÈ×Ê  DensityaroundtheUniversityArea éÇÏÏÛÊÃìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÛÈ×É ìâóÎÓÈÓÛÈÓÆ×ûÉÌÛÊÈÍÖÈÔ×ùÍÏÌÊ×Ô×ÎÉÓÆ×ìÐÛÎ ÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×Ø×ÎÉÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎØÐÛÎØÇÉ×É ÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕÈÔ×è×ÄÛÉûïçÎÓÆ×ÊÉÓÈÃÙÛÏÌÇÉ withComprehensivePlan éÈÛÖÖûÉÉÓÕÎ×ØìøééÈÛÖÖûÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØùÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎ Overlays éÇÏÏÛÊÃìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÛÈ×É ìâóÎÓÈÓÛÈÓÆ×ûÉÌÛÊÈÍÖùÍÏÌÊ×Ô×ÎÉÓÆ×ìÐÛÎ ÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÃÛÊ×ÛÉÈÔÛÈÏÛÃÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÍÆ×ÊÐÛà ÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÚ×ÃÍÎØÕ×Î×ÊÛÐØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ìÛÕ× ÍÖ  withComprehensivePlan éÈÛÖÖûÉÉÓÕÎ×ØìøééÈÛÖÖûÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØùÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎ ìÛÕ× ÍÖ  Redevelopment éÇÏÏÛÊÃìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÛÈ×É ûÉÌÛÊÈÍÖÈÔ×ùÍÏÌÊ×Ô×ÎÉÓÆ×ìÐÛÎÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÃÛÊ×ÛÉ ÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ØÍÊ×ÎÙÍÇÊÛÕ×ØÖÍÊ Ê×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ withComprehensivePlan éÈÛÖÖûÉÉÓÕÎ×ØìøééÈÛÖÖûÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØùÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎ TransportationPlan éÇÏÏÛÊÃìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÛÈ×É ùÍÇÎÙÓÐóÎÓÈÓÛÈÓÆ×ùÍÎØÇÙÈÛÎÛÐÃÉÓÉÍÖÈÔÍÊÍÇÕÔÖÛÊ× ÌÐÛÎÓÎÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÍÎÅÓÈÔÛÊ×ÆÓÉ×ØÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÌÐÛÎÛÎØ ÍÈÔ×Ê×Ð×Ï×ÎÈÉÌÛÊÈÍÖÈÔ×ùÍÏÌÊ×Ô×ÎÉÓÆ×ìÐÛÎ withComprehensivePlan éÈÛÖÖûÉÉÓÕÎ×ØìøééÈÛÖÖûÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØùÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎ Data Collection & Analysis Indicators éÇÏÏÛÊÃìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÛÈ×É ìøéúÇÉÓÎ×ÉÉìÐÛÎóÎÓÈÛÈÓÆ×ø×ÖÓÎ×ÛÎØÖÍÊÏÇÐÛÈ×Û  óÈ×ÏÌÊ×É×ÎÈ×ØÛÈìâåÍÊÑÉÔÍÌ ÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉÈÔÛÈÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ÉÛÎØÈÊÛÙÑÉÑ×ÃÓÎØÓÙÛÈÍÊÉÛÎØ Ú×ÎÙÔÏÛÊÑÉÈÍÔ×ÐÌ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎØ Ø×ÙÓÉÓÍÎÉÛÊ×ÅÍÊÑÓÎÕÈÍÛÙÙÍÏÌÐÓÉÔÈÔ×ÕÍÛÐÉÍÖÈÔ× ùÍÏÌÊ×Ô×ÎÉÓÆ×ìÐÛÎ éÈÛÖÖûÉÉÓÕÎ×ØòìóÈ×ÏùÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø   Development Services SubdivisionRegulations éÇÏÏÛÊÃìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÛÈ×É ùÍÇÎÙÓÐóÎÓÈÓÛÈÓÆ×ïÇÐÈÓÌÔÛÉ×Ø×ÖÖÍÊÈÍÖÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ× ùÍÇÎÙÓÐÊ×Ö×ÊÊ×ØÕÊÍÅÈÔÏÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈÓÈ×ÏÉÚÛÙÑÈÍ ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉÈÔÛÈÅÓÐÐÓÎÈ×ÕÊÛÈ×ÈÔ×ê×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÓÎÈÍÈÔ×ùìûù çøíÊ×ÏÍÆ×ÓÎÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÙÓ×ÉÛÎØÓÎÙÐÇØ×Ê×ÆÓÉ×ØéÇÏÏ×Ê éÈÛÖÖÈÍÚÊÓÎÕÓÎÈ×ÕÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖéÇÚØÓÆÓÉÓÍÎ ÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉ×ÉÛÎØÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉê×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÓÎÈÍçøíÛÈÖÇÈÇÊ×Ï××ÈÓÎÕ éÈÛÖÖûÉÉÓÕÎ×ØòéûõúùûÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØùÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎ ÉÈëÇÛÊÈ×Ê ÖÓÊÉÈÌÔÛÉ× Tree Ordinance éÇÏÏÛÊÃìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÛÈ×É ùÍÇÎÙÓÐÛÉÑ×ØéÈÛÖÖÈÍÌÊÍÙ××ØÅÓÈÔØÊÛÖÈÓÎÕ ùÍÇÎÙÓÐóÎÓÈÓÛÈÓÆ×÷ÆÛÐÇÛÈ×Ö×ÛÉÓÚÓÐÓÈÃÍÖÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎÕ ÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÈÊ××ÌÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉ Fall2008:Drafttree preservation ordinance éÈÛÖÖûÉÉÓÕÎ×ØùôúùûÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØùÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎ ëÇÛÊÈ×Ê  SubdivisionRegulations-differencesbetweenCity&ETJ éÇÏÏÛÊÃìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÛÈ×É ìâóÎÓÈÓÛÈÓÆ×ìÊ×É×ÎÈØÓÖÖ×Ê×ÎÙ×ÉÓÎÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉÖÍÊ óÎÓÈÓÛÐÍÆ×ÊÆÓ×ÅÌÊ×É×ÎÈ×ØÛÈåÍÊÑÉÔÍÌ ÉÇÚØÓÆÓÉÓÍÎÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÛÎØÓÎÈÔ×÷èòóÈ×ÏÅÓÐÐ Ú×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÚ×ÖÍÊ×ÛÎØÛÖÈ×ÊÕÊÍÅÈÔÏÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈ ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ éÈÛÖÖûÉÉÓÕÎ×ØûõûÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØùÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎ ÉÈëÇÛÊÈ×Ê  ìÛÕ× ÍÖ  TrafficImpactAnalysis éÇÏÏÛÊÃìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÛÈ×É ùÍÇÎÙÓÐÊ×Ö×ÊÊ×ØÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÚÛÙÑÈÍìâÖÍÊ ìâóÎÓÈÓÛÈÓÆ×ìÊÍÌÍÉ×ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉÈÍçøíÈÔÛÈÅÓÐÐ ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎ Ê×ÆÓÉ×ÈÔ×èóûÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉÖÍÊÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÛÎØÎÍÎ   ìâÈÍÊ×ÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ× Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ 8/28/08: ùÍÇÎÙÓÐÈÍÙÍÎÉØÓ×ÊÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ× éÈÛÖÖûÉÉÓÕÎ×ØúùòéûÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØùÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎ ÉÈëÇÛÊÈ×Ê  CondoZoning éÇÏÏÛÊÃìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÛÈ×É ìâóÎÓÈÓÛÈÓÆ×éÇÊÆ×ÃÔÍÅÍÈÔ×ÊÂÍÎÓÎÕÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×É óÈ×ÏÌÊ×É×ÎÈ×ØÛÈìâåÍÊÑÉÔÍÌ ÛØØÊ×ÉÉÙÍÎØÍÇÉ×ÉÛÎØ×ÆÛÐÇÛÈ×Ö×ÛÉÓÚÓÐÓÈÃÍÖÙÊ×ÛÈÓÎÕ ÛÙÍÎØÍÂÍÎÓÎÕØÓÉÈÊÓÙÈ×ÄÙÐÇÉÓÆ×ÍÖÍÈÔ×ÊÕ×Î×ÊÛÐÏÇÐÈÓ ÖÛÏÓÐÃØÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÉ éÈÛÖÖûÉÉÓÕÎ×ØïêóÈ×ÏùÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø  Non-residentialArchitectureStandards(NRA)Results éÇÏÏÛÊÃìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÛÈ×É ìâóÎÓÈÓÛÈÓÆ×éÇÊÆ×ÃÛÎØÊ×ÆÓ×ÅÈÔ××ÎØÌÊÍØÇÙÈÍÖ   óÈ×ÏÌÊ×É×ÎÈ×ØÛÈìâåÍÊÑÉÔÍÌ ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×ØÎÍÎÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÈÔÛÈÅ×Ê×Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ø 8/28/08óÈ×ÏÈÍÚ×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈ×ØÛÈùÍÇÎÙÓÐåÍÊÑÉÔÍÌ ÈÍÏ××ÈÈÔ×îêûÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÛØÍÌÈ×ØÓÎ óÈ×Ï ÏÛÃÓÎÆÍÐÆ×ÐÍÙÛÐÙÛÉ×ÉÈÇØÓ×ÉìâÈÍÇÊÍÖÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÛÎØÉÇÊÆ×ÃÍÖÍÈÔ×ÊÙÓÈÓ×É éÈÛÖÖûÉÉÓÕÎ×ØòéùôóÈ×ÏùÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø   StreetscapeUpdate éÇÏÏÛÊÃìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÛÈ×É ìâóÎÓÈÓÛÈÓÆ×éÇÊÆ×ÃÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÍÖÍÈÔ×ÊÙÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎØ   óÈ×ÏÌÊ×É×ÎÈ×ØÛÈìâåÍÊÑÉÔÍÌ Ê×ÆÓ×Å×ÖÖ×ÙÈÓÆ×Î×ÉÉÍÖ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕéÈÛÖÖÉÇÊÆ×ÃÍÖÉÈÊ××ÈÉÙÛÌ×ÈÍÍÙÙÇÊÛÉÈÓÏ×Ì×ÊÏÓÈÉ ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÅÓÈÔÓÎÙÓÈÃÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉÛÎØÙÍÎÈ×ÄÈÇÛÐ ÈÔÍÊÍÇÕÔÖÛÊ×É éÈÛÖÖûÉÉÓÕÎ×ØðôóÈ×ÏùÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø   Outreach & Communications JointSubcommitteewithCityofBryanP&Z éÇÏÏÛÊÃìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÛÈ×É ìâÓÎÓÈÓÛÈÓÆ×÷ÄÌÐÍÊ×ÛÎØÉ××ÑÍÌÌÍÊÈÇÎÓÈÓ×ÉÖÍÊ  éÇÚÙÍÏÏÓÈÈ××Ï××ÈÓÎÕüúÊÃÛÎùÓÈÃôÛÐÐ ÌÛÊÈÎ×ÊÉÔÓÌÛÎØÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÖÍÊÕÛÈ×ÅÛÃÉÛÎØ 8/26/08:Subcommitteemeeting@CSCityHall ÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÉÙÍÏÏÍÎÈÍùÍÐÐ×Õ×éÈÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØúÊÃÛÎSept/October:JointP&Zmeeting withBryanP&Z éÈÛÖÖûÉÉÓÕÎ×ØòéûÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØùÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎ ÉÈëÇÛÊÈ×Ê  CommunityEducationaboutZoningIssues,Processes,etc éÇÏÏÛÊÃìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÛÈ×É ìøéúÇÉÓÎ×ÉÉìÐÛÎóÎÓÈÓÛÈÓÆ×ìÊÍÆÓØ×ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐ   ìÊ×É×ÎÈ×ØÛÉÌÛÊÈÍÖûÎÎÇÛÐê×ÌÍÊÈÛÈìâ Ï×ÈÔÍØÉÛÎØÖÍÊÇÏÉÈÍØÓÉ×ÏÓÎÛÈ×ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕåÍÊÑÉÔÍÌ ÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉ×ÉÛÎØÓÉÉÇ×É StaffAssigned:BC óÈ×ÏùÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø   ìÛÕ×ÍÖ  Outreach&EducationviaChannel19andWebsite éÇÏÏÛÊÃìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÛÈ×É ìøéúÇÉÓÎ×ÉÉìÐÛÎóÎÓÈÓÛÈÓÆ×÷ÎÔÛÎÙ×ÈÔ×   ìÊ×É×ÎÈ×ØÛÉÌÛÊÈÍÖûÎÎÇÛÐê×ÌÍÊÈÛÈìâ ÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÓÐÓÈÃÛÎØ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÓÆ×Î×ÉÉÍÖÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÙÛÈÓÍÎ åÍÊÑÉÔÍÌ ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÍÎÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÉÙÛÚÐ× ÙÔÛÎÎ×ÐÛÎØÅ×ÚÉÓÈ× éÈÛÖÖûÉÉÓÕÎ×ØúùóÈ×ÏùÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø   Pending Items EmploymentZoning éÇÏÏÛÊÃìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÛÈ×É Itemto bescheduled in future pendingcompletion of ìâóÎÓÈÓÛÈÓÆ×÷ÆÛÐÇÛÈ×ÂÍÎÓÎÕØÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÉÖÍÊÌ×ÊÏÓÈÈ×Ø É×ÊÆÓÙ× ÓÎØÇÉÈÊÓÛÐÚÛÉ×ØÇÉ×ÉÛÎØÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÃÐÛÎØÇÉ×Council initiatives. ÙÔÛÊÛÙÈ×ÊÈÓÉÈÓÙÉÖÍÊÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈ Former éÈÛÖÖûÉÉÓÕÎ×Øïê ðôûÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØùÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎ ÊØëÇÛÊÈ×Ê  ParkDevelopment éÇÏÏÛÊÃìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÛÈ×É Itemto bescheduled in future pendingcompletion of ìâóÎÓÈÓÛÈÓÆ×óÎÙÍÐÛÚÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÅÓÈÔìÛÊÑÉúÍÛÊØ ØÓÉÙÇÉÉÔÍÅÎ×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÛÎØÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÌÛÊÑÉÉ×ÊÆ×Council initiatives. ÈÔ×ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÛÎØÙÔÛÐÐ×ÎÕ×ÉÓÎÌÛÊÑÖÇÎØÓÎÕÛÎØ ÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ× Former éÈÛÖÖûÉÉÓÕÎ×ØìøééÈÛÖÖûÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØùÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎ ÊØëÇÛÊÈ×Ê  ContextualResidentialStandards éÇÏÏÛÊÃìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÛÈ×É Itemto bescheduled in future pendingcompletion of ìâóÎÓÈÓÛÈÓÆ×÷ÄÌÐÍÊ×ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÚÇÓÐØÓÎÕÏÛÉÉ É×ÈÚÛÙÑÛÎØÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÖÍÊÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÉÓÎ Council initiatives. Ê×ÐÛÈÓÍÎÈÍÈÔ×ÙÍÎÈ×ÄÈÓÎÅÔÓÙÔÈÔ×ÃÛÊ×ÌÐÛÙ×Ø Former éÈÛÖÖûÉÉÓÕÎ×ØìøééÈÛÖÖûÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØùÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎÈÔëÇÛÊÈ×Ê  Parking OrdinanceUpdate éÇÏÏÛÊÃìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÛÈ×É Itemto bescheduled in future pendingcompletion of ìâóÎÓÈÓÛÈÓÆ×éÇÊÆ×ÃÌ××ÊÙÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎØ×ÆÛÐÇÛÈ×ÌÛÊÑÓÎÕ ÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÖÍÊØÓÖÖ×Ê×ÎÈÈÃÌ×ÉÍÖÇÉ×ÉÌÛÊÈÓÙÇÐÛÊÐà Council initiatives. ÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÖÍÊÉÔÍÌÌÓÎÕÙ×ÎÈ×ÊÉ Former éÈÛÖÖûÉÉÓÕÎ×ØìøééÈÛÖÖûÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØùÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎÈÔëÇÛÊÈ×Ê  Connectivity éÇÏÏÛÊÃìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÛÈ×É ìâÓÎÓÈÓÛÈÓÆ×ê×ÆÓ×ÅÍÖùÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÆÓÈÃê×ÌÍÊÈ éÈÇØà New Item ÛÎØ×ÆÛÐÇÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×ÌÍÐÓÙÓ×ÉÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛÛÎØ ÍÊ ÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÉÈÍÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÛÈ×ÛÐÐÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎÏÍØ×É éÈÛÖÖûÉÉÓÕÎ×ØìøééÈÛÖÖûÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØùÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎ ImpactFeeFunding éÇÏÏÛÊÃìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÛÈ×É New Item ìâÓÎÓÈÓÛÈÓÆ×÷ÆÛÐÇÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×Ï×ÙÔÛÎÓÉÏÉÖÍÊ ÖÇÎØÓÎÕÛÎØÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÎÕÌÇÚÐÓÙÓÎÖÊÛÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ× éÈÛÖÖûÉÉÓÕÎ×ØìøééÈÛÖÖûÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØùÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎ ìÛÕ×ÍÖ Planning&ZoningCommission2008PlanofWork AnticipatedCompletionofPlanofWorkItems ã×ÛÊ ùÍÏÌ ëÇÛÊÈ×Ê ÉÈ ÊØÈÔ ÉÈìÐÛÎ Community&NeighborhoodPlanning ùÍÏÌÊ×Ô×ÎÉÓÆ×ìÐÛÎìÔÛÉ× ä ûÎÎ×ÄÛÈÓÍÎ î×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØóÎÈ×ÕÊÓÈÃää ùÛÌÓÈÛÐóÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ø×ÎÉÓÈÃÛÊÍÇÎØÈÔ×çÎÓÆ×ÊÉÓÈÃûÊ×Ûä íÆ×ÊÐÛÃÉä ê×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈä èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎìÐÛÎä DataCollection&Analysis óÎØÓÙÛÈÍÊÉ DevelopmentServices éÇÚØÓÆÓÉÓÍÎê×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉää èÊ××íÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ä éÇÚØÓÆÓÉÓÍÎê×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉØÓÖÖ×Ê×ÎÙ×ÉÚ×ÈÅ××ÎùÓÈÃ÷èòä èÊÛÖÖÓÙóÏÌÛÙÈûÎÛÐÃÉÓÉ îÍÎÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐûÊÙÔÓÈ×ÙÈÇÊ×éÈÛÎØÛÊØÉîêûê×ÉÇÐÈÉ éÈÊ××ÈÉÙÛÌ×ÇÌØÛÈ× ùÍÎØÍâÍÎÓÎÕ ÷ÏÌÐÍÃÏ×ÎÈâÍÎÓÎÕ ìÛÊÑø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ùÍÎÈ×ÄÈÇÛÐê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐéÈÛÎØÛÊØÉ ìÛÊÑÓÎÕíÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÇÌØÛÈ× Connectivity ImpactFeeFunding Outreach&Communications òÍÓÎÈéÇÚÙÍÏÏÓÈÈ××ÅÓÈÔùÓÈÃÍÖúÊÃÛÎìâä íÇÈÊ×ÛÙÔ÷ØÇÙÛÈÓÍÎÆÓÛùÔÛÎÎ×Ð ÛÎØå×ÚÉÓÈ× ùÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃ÷ØÇÙÛÈÓÍÎÛÚÍÇÈâÍÎÓÎÕóÉÉÇ×ÉìÊÍÙ×ÉÉ×ÈÙ Mid-YearReviewofPlanofWork äûÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×ØùÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎ 9 óÈ×ÏùÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø MINUTES PZC LANNING AND ONING OMMISSION Workshop Meeting Thursday, July 17, 2008 at 6:00 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman John Nichols, Noel Bauman, Paul Greer, Doug Slack and Thomas Woodfin COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Bill Davis CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Larry Stewart CITY STAFF PRESENT: Senior Planners Jennifer Prochazka and Lindsay Boyer, Staff Planners Jason Schubert and Lauren Hovde, Assistant City Engineer Josh Norton, Senior Assistant City Engineer Carol Cotter, City Engineer Alan Gibbs, Director Bob Cowell, Assistant Director Lance Simms, Planning Administrator Molly Hitchcock, First Assistant City Attorney Carla Robinson, Action Center Representative Kerry Mullins and Staff Assistant Brittany Caldwell 1.Call the meeting to order. Chairman Nichols called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. 2.Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. There was general discussion regarding consent agenda items 3.4 and 3.5 and regular agenda item 13. 3.Discussion of Minor and Amending Plats approved by Staff. South Hampton Phase 4 Final Plat - Replat (07-00500259) Staff reviewed the Plat that was approved at the staff level. 4.Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding Planning and Development Services Department activities 2007-2008 and proposed activities for 2008-2013 based (BC) on the adopted Business Plan. Director Cowell gave an update on the activities for the Planning and Development Services Department. He stated that Neighborhood Services and Code Enforcement had been added to the department. He also reviewed the department performance measures.  July 17, 2008 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 3 5.Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the 2008 P&Z Plan of Work and (BC) conducting its mid-year review (see attached). Jason Schubert, Staff Planner, gave an update on the 2008 P&Z Plan of Work. 6.Presentation, possible action and discussion regarding an update on the following item(s): A rezoning of 14.15 acres from A-O Agricultural-Open to A-P Administrative Professional for the properties located at 3690 and 3695 Longmire Drive, generally located on both the east and west sides of Longmire Drive, south of the intersection of Longmire Drive and Bridle Gate Drive. The Commission heard this item on 15 May and voted 5-0 to recommend approval. The Council heard this item on 12 June and voted 7-0 for approval. A rezoning from A-O, Agricultural Open to PDD, Planned Development District for 293.233 acres of the Creek Meadows Subdivision generally located on Greens Prairie Trail between the intersections of Greens Prairie Trail with Greens Prairie Road West and Royder Ridge. The Commission heard this item on 15 May and voted 5-0 to recommend approval. The Council heard this item on 12 June and voted 7-0 for approval. Chairman Nichols reviewed the above-referenced items that had been heard by the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council. 7.Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings. August 7, 2008 ~ Planning & Zoning Meeting ~ City Hall Council Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. & Regular 7:00 p.m. August 19, 2008 ~ CPAC Meeting ~ Conference Center ~ 5:30 p.m. Director Cowell reviewed the upcoming meeting dates for the Planning & Zoning th Commission. He stated that the August 7 Planning & Zoning Meeting was moved to th August 14. He also stated that an Economic Outlook Briefing was being held at The th Hilton on July 24 from 11:45 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. 8.Presentation, discussion and possible action regarding the Comprehensive Planning process. Jennifer Prochazka, Senior Planner, stated that the next meeting would be held on August 19, 2008 at the Conference Center. 9.Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, CIP Bond Committee, Council Transportation Committee, Joint College Station P&Z / Bryan P&Z Committee on Common Gateways and Corridors, Joint Parks/Planning & Zoning Subcommittee, CSISD Rezoning Committee, CSISD Long Range Education Planning Committee.  July 17, 2008 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3 Commissioner Bauman stated that the Joint College Station P&Z/Bryan P&Z Committee on Common Gateways met and discussed the Northgate area and the similarities and difference between College Station and Bryan in that area. 10.Discussion and possible action on future agenda items – A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. Commissioner Stearns stated that he would like an update on connectivity and a review of impact fees. 11.Adjourn. Commissioner Bauman motioned to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner Woodfin seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). Meeting adjourned at 7:05 p.m. Approved: ________________________________ John Nichols, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Attest: _____________________________________ Brittany Caldwell, Staff Assistant Planning and Development Services  July 17, 2008 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3 MINUTES PZC LANNING AND ONING OMMISSION Regular Meeting Thursday, July 17, 2008 at 7:00 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman John Nichols, Noel Bauman, Paul Greer, Doug Slack and Thomas Woodfin COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Bill Davis CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Larry Stewart CITY STAFF PRESENT: Senior Planners Jennifer Prochazka and Lindsay Boyer, Staff Planners Jason Schubert and Lauren Hovde, Assistant City Engineer Josh Norton, Senior Assistant City Engineer Carol Cotter, City Engineer Alan Gibbs, Director Bob Cowell, Assistant Director Lance Simms, Planning Administrator Molly Hitchcock, First Assistant City Attorney Carla Robinson, Action Center Representative Kerry Mullins and Staff Assistant Brittany Caldwell 1. Call Meeting to Order. Chairman John Nichols called the meeting to order at 7:12 p.m. 2.Hear Citizens. Consent Agenda 3.. 3.1Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting Minutes. June 5, 2008 Workshop June 5, 2008 Regular June 19, 2008 Workshop June 19, 2008 Regular 3.2Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Preliminary Plat for The Barracks Subdivision, consisting of 108 lots on 13.416 acres located at 2950 Rock Case #08- Prairie Road West, generally located 700 feet west of Wellborn Road. 00500133 (JS)  July 17, 2008 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 7 3.3Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Indian Lakes Ph. 11, consisting of 35 lots on 76.85 acres generally located along the future extension of Anasazi Bluff Drive in the southern portion of the subdivision and Case #08-00500131 (MR) located in the City's Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction. 3.4Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for the Ware Addition, consisting of one lot on 1.371 acres, located at 2800 University Drive Case #08- East, generally located at the northwest corner of Veterans Park. 00500100 (JS) 3.5Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Kyle View Estates, consisting of 127 lots on 45.19 acres, located at 3455 Capstone Drive, generally located at the southwest corner of Capstone Drive and Wellborn Road. Case #08-00500129 (JP) Commissioner Bauman motioned to approve items 3.1-3.5 on the consent agenda. Commissioner Slack seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). Regular Agenda 4.Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. No items were removed from the Consent Agenda. 5.Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an annexation (LS) petition for 1.02 acres located in the 3200 block of Rock Prairie Road West. Lance Simms, Assistant Director, presented the annexation petition and recommended approval. Chairman Nichols opened the public hearing. No one spoke during the public hearing. Chairman Nichols closed the public hearing. Commissioner Bauman motioned to recommend approval. Commissioner Stearns seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 6.Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an amendment to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan from Single Family Residential Medium Density to Industrial / R & D for 2.04 acres located at 3227 Rock Prairie Road West generally located south of the Williamsgate Subdivision and 2,000 feet west of the intersection with Case #08-00500115 (JS) Wellborn Road. Jason Schubert, Staff Planner, presented the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and recommended approval.  July 17, 2008 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 7 Chairman Nichols opened the public hearing. No one spoke during the public hearing. Chairman Nichols closed the public hearing. Commissioner Bauman motioned to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Commissioner Slack seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 7.Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a rezoning from A-O Agricultural Open to C-2 Commercial-Industrial for 2.04 acres located at 3227 Rock Prairie Road West generally located south of the Williamsgate Subdivision and 2,000 feet Case #08-00500114 (JS) west of the intersection with Wellborn Road. Jason Schubert, Staff Planner, presented the rezoning and recommended approval with the condition that the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is approved and the portion of the property outside the City limits is annexed. Chairman Nichols opened the public hearing. No one spoke during the public hearing. Chairman Nichols closed the public hearing. Commissioner Woodfin motioned to recommend approval of the rezoning. Commissioner Slack seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 8.Public hearing, presentation, possible action and discussion on a Final Plat for Horse Haven Estates Phase 4, including a replat of Horse Haven Estates Lot 2C, consisting of 74 lots on 14.47 acres located at 2691 Horse Haven Lane, generally located north of Case #08-00500106 (JP) Horse Haven Lane and south of Switch Station Road. Jennifer Prochazka, Senior Planner, presented the replat and recommended approval. There was general discussion regarding the replat. Chairman Nichols opened the public hearing. Sherry Ellison, 2705 Brookway Drive, expressed concern about the traffic and stability of the neighborhood. She stated that that neighborhood was too dense. Chairman Nichols closed the public hearing. Commissioner Slack asked if the new Appomattox would be the same width as the existing. Ms. Prochazka stated that the new Appomattox would be narrower with striped bike lanes unlike the existing Appomattox.  July 17, 2008 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 7 Commissioner Stearn motioned to approve the replat. Commissioner Slack seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 9.Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a rezoning from A-O Agricultural Open to R-1 Single-Family for 2.93 acres located at 13881, 13889 and 13909 Renee Lane, generally located southwest of Victoria Avenue at the end of Renee Case #08-00500127 (JP) Lane. Jennifer Prochazka, Senior Planner, presented the rezoning and recommended approval. She stated that the property is owned by three different parties. There was general discussion regarding the rezoning. Chairman Nichols opened the public hearing. Rick Tobias, 13889 Renee Lane, stated that there is currently only one dwelling unit on the property. Chairman Nichols closed the public hearing. Commissioner Bauman motioned to recommend approval of the rezoning. Commissioner Woodfin seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 10.Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a rezoning from R- 1 Single Family Residential to R-4 Multi-Family Residential for 0.4848 acres located on Case #08- the northwest corner of Harvey Mitchell Parkway and Jones-Butler Road. 00500135 (LH) Lauren Hovde, Staff Planner, presented the rezoning and recommended approval. Chairman Nichols opened the public hearing. No one spoke during the public hearing. Chairman Nichols closed the public hearing. Commissioner Woodfin motioned to recommend approval of the rezoning. Commissioner Bauman seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 11.Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an amendment to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, from Rural Residential to Single Family Residential Medium Density, Single Family Residential High Density, Residential Attached, and Planned Development for a mix of commercial uses, for 39.873 acres located off Jones- Case #08- Butler Road and near Cain Road, adjacent to the Las Palomas Subdivision. 00500130 (LB) Lindsay Boyer, Senior Planner, presented the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and recommended approval. July 17, 2008 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 7 Commissioner Stearns asked if there were issues of connectivity onto Jones Butler Road and if there were buffer requirements between the different uses. Ms. Boyer stated that there were two access points onto Jones Butler Road that meet spacing requirements and a buffer was not required because of the Right-of-Way on the preliminary plat that separates all three uses. Chairman Nichols asked why the applicant chose a PDD zoning rather than C-1, General Commercial. Chairman Nichols opened the public hearing. David Borsack, applicant, stated that he chose the PDD zoning because he did not want uses on the property that C-1, General Commercial allows. Chairman Nichols closed the public hearing. Commissioner Bauman motioned to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Commissioner Woodfin seconded the motion, motion passed (6- 0). 12.Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amendment to Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Ordinance Case #08-0050001 (MH) Section 2.4 Design Review Board regarding membership. Molly Hitchcock, Planning Administrator, presented the ordinance amendment regarding Design Review Board membership. There was general discussion regarding the ordinance amendment. Chairman Nichols opened the public hearing. No one spoke during the public hearing. Chairman Nichols closed the public hearing. Commissioner Slack motioned to recommend approval of the ordinance amendment. Commissioner Stearns seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 13.Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amendment to Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Ordinance Section 7.9.B.6, Traffic Impact Analysis; Section 7.9.H, Submittal Requirements; and Case #08-00500001 (BC) adding Section 7.12, Traffic Impact Analysis. Director Cowell presented the ordinance amendment regarding Traffic Impact Analysis. Commissioner Woodfin stated that he was in favor of the ordinance amendment, but said that the existing model does not need to be replicated. July 17, 2008 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 7 Commissioner Stearns stated that developers need to be given options. Chairman Nichols opened the public hearing. Sherry Ellison, 2705 Brookway Drive, stated that she supported the ordinance amendment and said that it would be beneficial to new developments. Ed Theriot, Mitchell Planning Group, stated that he was representing the Home Builders Association. He expressed concern about the cost, timing and discretion in the ordinance. Randy French, 4301 Cupstone, stated that he did not believe that the Traffic Impact Analysis was need for residential developments. He also expressed concern about the cost. He said that staff should be able to make those decisions. Chairman Nichols closed the public hearing. Commissioner Bauman motioned to recommend approval of the ordinance amendment with the condition that staff present an alternative to the maximum units per acre for residential developments so that it would reflect current as-built conditions. Commissioner Slack seconded the motion. Commissioner Stearns stated that the trips generated needed to be reduced. Commissioner Stearns motioned to amend the existing motion to state that the trip generation be reduced to 50 trips during peak time. Commissioner Slack seconded the motion, motion failed (1-5). Commissioner Stearns was in favor of the amended motion. The original motion passed (6-0). 14.Discussion and possible action on future agenda items – A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. None 15.Adjourn. Commissioner Bauman motioned to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner Stearns seconded the motion, motioned passed (6-0). Meeting adjourned at 10:15 p.m. Approved: July 17, 2008 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 7 ________________________________ John Nichols, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Attest: _____________________________________ Brittany Caldwell, Staff Assistant Planning and Development Services July 17, 2008 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 7 of 7 PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR TOWER POINT 08-00500153 SCALE: ù ÛÎØûìÐÍÈÉÍÎ  ûÙÊ×É LOCATION:  åÓÐÐÓÛÏøöÓÈÙÔìÑÅÃÎÍÊÈÔÅ×ÉÈÙÍÊÎ×ÊÍÖéô ÛÎØéô ZONING: ù õ×Î×ÊÛÐùÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐÛÙÊ×É ûìûØÏÓÎÓÉÈÊÛÈÓÆ×ìÊÍÖ×ÉÉÓÍÎÛÐ ÛÙÊ×É ûíûÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐíÌ×Î ÛÙÊ×É íæùÍÊÊÓØÍÊíÆ×ÊÐÛà ÛÙÊ×É APPLICANT: ùÔÇÙÑ÷ÐÐÓÉÍÎÛÈÈÍÊÎ×ÃÖÍÊÈÔ×ÍÅÎ×ÊùÍÐÐ×Õ×éÈÛÈÓÍÎïÛÊÑ×ÈÌÐÛÙ× PROJECT MANAGER: ðÓÎØÉÛÃúÍÃ×Êûóùìé×ÎÓÍÊìÐÛÎÎ×Ê ÐÚÍÃ×ÊüÙÉÈÄÕÍÆ RECOMMENDATION: ûÌÌÊÍÆÛÐÅÓÈÔéÈÛÖÖê×ÆÓ×ÅùÍÏÏ×ÎÈÉ ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕâÍÎÓÎÕï××ÈÓÎÕìÛÕ× ÍÖ ûÇÕÇÉÈ    ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕâÍÎÓÎÕï××ÈÓÎÕìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕâÍÎÓÎÕï××ÈÓÎÕìÛÕ× ìÛÕ× ÍÖ ûÇÕÇÉÈ  ûÇÕÇÉÈ    DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation:   ÛÎØ   Zoning: ûíûÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐíÌ×ÎÈÍù õ×Î×ÊÛÐùÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐ ûí ûÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐíÌ×ÎÈÍù õ×Î×ÊÛÐùÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐÛÎØûìûØÏÓÎÓÉÈÊÛÈÓÆ× ìÊÍÖ×ÉÉÓÍÎÛЦø×ÙÛÈÇÊøÊÓÆ×ìÊÍÌ×ÊÈà  ùÍÊÊÓØÍÊíÆ×ÊÐÛà  Site development: æÛÙÛÎÈ COMMENTS Water: èÔ×Ê×ÛÊ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÅÛÈ×ÊÏÛÓÎÉÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×Ì×ÊÓÏ×È×ÊÛÎØÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÊÍÛØÅÛÃÉÍÖ Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈûØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÌÇÚÐÓÙÅÛÈ×ÊÏÛÓÎÉÛÊ×Ê×ËÇÓÊ×ØÈÍÚ××ÄÈ×ÎØ×ØÈÍÛÐÐ ÐÍÈÉ Sewer: èÔ×Ê×ÛÊ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÉÛÎÓÈÛÊÃÉ×Å×ÊÈÊÇÎÑÐÓÎ×ÉÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃûÌÇÚÐÓÙ É×Å×ÊÏÛÓÎÓÉÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ØÈÍÚ××ÄÈ×ÎØ×ØÈÍÛÐÐÐÍÈÉ Streets: ûùÛÌÓÈÛÐóÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÉÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÃÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÎÕûÊÊÓÎÕÈÍÎêÍÛØÛÎØ ø×ÙÛÈÇÊøÊÓÆ× Off-site Easements: îÍÎ×ÛÈÈÔÓÉÈÓÏ× Drainage: èÔ×Ê×ÓÉÛÎ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÊ×ÕÓÍÎÛÐØ×È×ÎÈÓÍÎÖÛÙÓÐÓÈà Flood Plain: ö÷ïûØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØÖÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎÖÍÊéÌÊÓÎÕùÊ××ÑÓÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÍÎÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃû ðíïêÓÉÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÃÚ×ÓÎÕÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÖÍÊÉÇÚÏÓÈÈÛÐÈÍö÷ïûÈÍÊ×ÖÐ×ÙÈÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉöÓÎÓÉÔ×ØöÐÍÍÊ×Ð×ÆÛÈÓÍÎÉÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ØÖÍÊÈÔ×ÐÍÈÉ ÓÏÌÛÙÈ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ÖÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎ Oversize Request: îÍÎ×Ê×ËÇ×ÉÈ×Ø Impact Fees: èÔ×ÏÛÒÍÊÓÈÃÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÓÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÔ×éÌÊÓÎÕùÊ××Ñé×Å×ÊóÏÌÛÙÈö×× ûÊ×Û ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÃÈÔ×óÏÌÛÙÈö××ÖÍÊÈÔÓÉÛÊ×ÛÓÉ Ì×ÊðÓÆÓÎÕçÎÓÈ ÷ËÇÓÆÛÐ×ÎÈóÏÌÛÙÈö××ÉÛÊ×ØÇ×ÛÈÈÓÏ×ÍÖúÇÓÐØÓÎÕì×ÊÏÓÈ REVIEW CRITERIA Compliance with Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance: èÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊ×ÐÓÏÓÎÛÊÃÌÐÛÈÓÉÓÎÙÍÏÌÐÓÛÎÙ×ÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ùÍÏÌÊ×Ô×ÎÉÓÆ×ìÐÛÎÖÍÊê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐê×ÈÛÓÐ ÛÎØíÖÖÓÙ×ÍÎÈÔ×ÈÊÛÙÈÛÉÅ×ÐÐÛÉÅÓÈÔÈÔ×èÔÍÊÍÇÕÔÖÛÊ×ìÐÛÎÛÎØïÛÉÈ×ÊçÈÓÐÓÈÃìÐÛÎ Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌÊ×ÐÓÏÓÎÛÊÃÌÐÛÈÓÉÓÎ ÙÍÏÌÐÓÛÎÙ×ÅÓÈÔÈÔ×éÇÚØÓÆÓÉÓÍÎê×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉúÐÍÙÑÐ×ÎÕÈÔÆÛÊÓÛÎÙ×ÉÛÐÍÎÕûÊÊÓÎÕÈÍÎêÍÛØ éÈÛÈ×ôÓÕÔÅÛÃÛÎØéÈÛÈ×ôÓÕÔÅÛà Å×Ê×ÕÊÛÎÈ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕÛÎØâÍÎÓÎÕ ùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÌÊ×ÆÓÍÇÉèÍÅ×ÊìÍÓÎÈìÊ×ÐÓÏÓÎÛÊÃìÐÛÈÍÎòÛÎÇÛÊà èÔÓÉÌÐÛÈÓÉ ÛÏ×ÎØÓÎÕÈÔ×ÌÔÛÉÓÎÕÖÍÊÈÔ×ÌÐÛÈÛÎØÔÛÉÏÍØÓÖÓ×ØÉÍÏ×ÐÍÈÙÍÎÖÓÕÇÊÛÈÓÍÎÉÉÓÎÙ×ÈÔ× ÌÊ×ÆÓÍÇÉÌÊ×ÐÓÏÓÎÛÊÃÌÐÛÈÅÛÉÛÌÌÊÍÆ×Ø STAFF RECOMMENDATION éÈÛÖÖÊ×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÉÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐÅÓÈÔéÈÛÖÖê×ÆÓ×ÅùÍÏÏ×ÎÈÉ ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕâÍÎÓÎÕï××ÈÓÎÕìÛÕ× ÍÖ ûÇÕÇÉÈ    SUPPORTING MATERIALS ûÌÌÐÓÙÛÈÓÍÎ éÈÛÖÖê×ÆÓ×ÅùÍÏÏ×ÎÈÉ ùÍÌÃÍÖìÊ×ÐÓÏÓÎÛÊÃìÐÛÈÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÓÎÌÛÙÑ×È ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕâÍÎÓÎÕï××ÈÓÎÕìÛÕ×ÍÖ ûÇÕÇÉÈ      STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2 èÔ×ÛÙÙ×ÉÉ×ÛÉ×Ï×ÎÈÍÎðÍÈúÐÍÙÑ ÓÉØ×ÎÍÈ×ØÛÉ ªÓÎÅÓØÈÔÚÇÈÍÎÐÃÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×É ª ñ××ÌÓÎÏÓÎØÈÔÛÈÈÔÓÉÛÙÙ×ÉÉÅÓÐÐÏÍÉÈÐÓÑ×ÐÃÊ×ËÇÓÊ× ªÚ×ÖÍÊ×ÖÓÊÉÈÌÍÓÎÈÍÖÙÍÎÖÐÓÙÈéÍÈÔ× ÛÙÙ×ÉÉ×ÛÉ×Ï×ÎÈÎ××ØÉÈÍ×ÄÈ×ÎØÖÇÊÈÔ×ÊÓÎÈÍÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈà èÔ×ðíïêÖÍÊéÌÊÓÎÕùÊ××ÑØ×ÌÓÙÈ×ØÍÎÃÍÇÊÌÐÛÈÓÉÉÈÓÐÐÚ×ÓÎÕÌÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÛÎØÔÛÉÎÍÈÚ××Î ÛØÍÌÈ×ØÚÃö÷ïûóÎØÓÙÛÈ×ÈÔ×É×ÖÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎÐÓÏÓÈÉÛÉÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÌ×ÊåÛÐÈ×ÊìïÍÍÊ×ðíïê ãÍÇÛÐÉÍÎ××ØÈÍÉÔÍÅÈÔ×ÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÓÆ×ÖÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎÐÓÏÓÈÉúÍÈÔÐÓÏÓÈÉÎ××ØÈÍÚ×Ø×ÌÓÙÈ×Ø ÍÎÈÔ×ÌÐÛÈ èÔ×ÐÛÃÍÇÈÍÖÈÔ×ÇÈÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÓÉÍÎÐÃÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ØÙÍÎÙ×ÌÈÇÛÐÐÃðÓÎ×ÉÓÂ×ÛÎØÛÎÃÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÐÍÍÌÓÎÕ Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉÅÓÐÐÚ×Ø×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ØÅÓÈÔ×ÎÕÓÎ××ÊÓÎÕÊ×ÌÍÊÈÉÛÈöÓÎÛÐìÐÛÈ ê×ÆÓ×Å×ØÚÃùÛÊÍÐùÍÈÈ×ÊøÛÈ×ûÇÕÇÉÈ  FINAL PLAT FOR OAKLAND RIDGE (FP) 08-00500154 SCALE: ÐÍÈÉÍÎ  ÛÙÊ×É LOCATION: íÖÖòÍÎ×ÉúÇÈÐ×ÊêÍÛØÛÎØÎ×ÛÊùÛÓÎêÍÛØÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÈÍÈÔ×ðÛÉ ìÛÐÍÏÛÉéÇÚØÓÆÓÉÓÍÎ ZONING ûíûÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐíÌ×Î APPLICANT: øÛÆÓØúÍÊÉÛÙÑÍÅÎ×ÊÛÎØØ×Æ×ÐÍÌ×Ê PROJECT MANAGER: ðÓÎØÉÛÃúÍÃ×Êé×ÎÓÍÊìÐÛÎÎ×Êûóùì ðÛÇÊ×ÎûôÍÆØ×éÈÛÖÖìÐÛÎÎ×Ê ÐÔÍÆØ×üÙÉÈÄÕÍÆ RECOMMENDATION: ûÌÌÊÍÆÛÐ ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕâÍÎÓÎÕùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎìÛÕ× ÍÖ  ûÇÕÇÉÈ   ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕâÍÎÓÎÕùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎìÛÕ× ÍÖ  ûÇÕÇÉÈ   DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: ïÛÊÙÔ  Zoning: ûíûÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐíÌ×Î Preliminary Plat:   Final Plat: ûÌÌÊÍÆ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕÛÎØâÍÎÓÎÕùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÍÎ  ÚÇÈÔÛÉÎÍÈÚ××ÎÖÓÐ×ØÖÍÊÊ×ÙÍÊØ Site development: ÆÛÙÛÎÈ COMMENTS Parkland Dedication: îÍÎ×Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ø èÔ×ÏÛÉÈ×ÊÌÐÛÎÅÛÉÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÍÐÐ×Õ×éÈÛÈÓÍÎìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕÛÎØâÍÎÓÎÕùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎ Ú×ÖÍÊ×ÈÔ×÷èòìÛÊÑÐÛÎØø×ØÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉÅ×Ê×ÛØÍÌÈ×ØÛÎØÌÊÓÍÊÈÍÛÎÎ×ÄÛÈÓÍÎ REVIEW CRITERIA Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: èÔÓÉÖÓÎÛÐÌÐÛÈÓÉÓÎÙÍÏÌÐÓÛÎÙ×ÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÛÌÌÊÍÆ×Ø ïÛÉÈ×ÊìÐÛÎÛÎØìÊ×ÐÓÏÓÎÛÊÃìÐÛÈÛÉÅ×ÐÐÛÉÈÔ×éÇÚØÓÆÓÉÓÍÎê×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉûÌÊ×ÆÓÍÇÉÖÓÎÛÐÌÐÛÈ ÖÍÊìÔÛÉ× ÅÛÉÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕÛÎØâÍÎÓÎÕùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÍÎîÍÆ×ÏÚ×Ê  èÔÓÉ Ê×ÆÓÉ×ØÌÐÛÈÓÉØ×ØÓÙÛÈÓÎÕÈÔ×ÛÐÐ×ÃÚ×ÔÓÎØÈÔ×ÈÍÅÎÔÍÏ×É×ÙÈÓÍÎÛÉÌÇÚÐÓÙÓÎÉÈ×ÛØÍÖÌÊÓÆÛÈ×ÛÉ ÓÈÅÛÉÓÐÐÇÉÈÊÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ÌÊ×ÆÓÍÇÉÌÐÛÈ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS éÈÛÖÖÊ×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÉÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐÛÉÈÔ×Ê×ËÇ×ÉÈ×ØÌÐÛÈÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÓÉÓÎÑ××ÌÓÎÕÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÛÌÌÊÍÆ×Ø ïÛÉÈ×ÊìÐÛÎÖÍÊíÛÑÐÛÎØêÓØÕ×éÇÚØÓÆÓÉÓÍÎ SUPPORTING MATERIALS ûÌÌÐÓÙÛÈÓÍÎ ùÍÌÃÍÖöÓÎÛÐìÐÛÈÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÓÎÌÛÙÑ×È ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕâÍÎÓÎÕùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎìÛÕ× ÍÖ  ûÇÕÇÉÈ    PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR GRAHAM RD INDUSTRIAL PARK (PP) 08-00500150 SCALE: ÐÍÈÍÎ ÛÙÊ×É LOCATION:  õÊÛÔÛÏêØ ZONING: ï ðÓÕÔÈóÎØÇÉÈÊÓÛÐ APPLICANT: ûéÙÍÈÈåÓÐÐÓÛÏÉè×ÄÛÉûïçÎÓÆ×ÊÉÓÈà PROJECT MANAGER: ïÛÈÈêÍÚÓÎÉÍÎéÈÛÖÖìÐÛÎÎ×Ê ÏÊÍÚÓÎÉÍÎüÙÉÈÄÕÍÆ RECOMMENDATION: óÖÈÔ×Ê×ËÇ×ÉÈ×ØÆÛÊÓÛÎÙ×ÉÛÊ×ÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ØéÈÛÖÖÊ×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÉ ÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐ ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕâÍÎÓÎÕï××ÈÓÎÕìÛÕ× ÍÖ ûÇÕÇÉÈ    ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕâÍÎÓÎÕï××ÈÓÎÕìÛÕ× ÍÖ ûÇÕÇÉÈ    DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation:    Zoning: ûíÈÍê  ÛÎØêÈÍï   Site development: æÛÙÛÎÈ COMMENTS Water: èÔ×ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÓÉÎÍÈÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÈÍÛÎ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÌÇÚÐÓÙÅÛÈ×Ê ÏÛÓÎôÍÅ×Æ×ÊÈÔ×ùÓÈêÉïÛÉÈ×ÊçÈÓÐÓÈÃìÐÛÎØÍ×ÉÓÐÐÇÉÈÊÛÈ×ÈÔ×ÖÇÈÇÊ× ×ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÍÎÍÖÛÅÛÈ×ÊÏÛÓÎÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ××ÛÉÈ×ÊÎÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÐÓÎ×ÍÊÛÚÛÎØÍÎ×Ø éÙÔÛÖÖ×ÊêÍÛØêíåèÔÓÉ×ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÍÎÓÉÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×ÛÉÈÔ×Ê×ÓÉÛ ÓÎÅÛÈ×Ê ÏÛÓÎÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÎ×ÛÊÈÔ×ÉÍÇÈÔ×ÛÉÈ×ÊÎÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÙÍÊÎ×ÊÛÉÅ×ÐÐÛÉÛÓÎ ÅÛÈ×ÊÏÛÓÎÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÎ×ÛÊÈÔ×ÎÍÊÈÔ×ÛÉÈ×ÊÎÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÙÍÊÎ×ÊöÇÈÇÊ× Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÍÊÖÓÎÛÐÌÐÛÈÈÓÎÕÍÖÈÔÓÉÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÅÍÇÐØÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÈÔÛÈÈÔÓÉ ×ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÍÎÍÖÓÎÖÊÛÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×Ú×ÏÛØ×ÓÎÍÊØ×ÊÈÍÛØ×ËÇÛÈ×ÐÃÉ×ÊÆ×ÈÔÓÉ ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈà Sewer: èÔ×ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÓÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÈÍÛ ÓÎÉÛÎÓÈÛÊÃÉ×Å×ÊÏÛÓÎ ÅÔÓÙÔÊÇÎÉÛÐÍÎÕõÊÛÔÛÏêÍÛØÛÉÅ×ÐÐÛÉÛ ÓÎÉÛÎÓÈÛÊÃÉ×Å×ÊÏÛÓÎ ÅÔÓÙÔÓÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÎ×ÛÊÈÔ×ÎÍÊÈÔ×ÛÉÈ×ÊÎÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÙÍÊÎ×Ê Streets: õÊÛÔÛÏêØÓÉÛÏÛÒÍÊÙÍÐÐ×ÙÈÍÊÛÉÉÔÍÅÍÎÈÔ×ùÓÈêÉèÔÍÊÍÇÕÔÖÛÊ×ìÐÛÎ îÍÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐØ×ØÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÛÊ×Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ø Off-site Easements: éÍÏ×ÍÖÖÉÓÈ××ÛÉ×Ï×ÎÈÉÔÛÆ×Ú××ÎÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ØÍÎÈÔ×ÌÊ×ÐÓÏÓÎÛÊÃÌÐÛÈÛÎØ ÛÊ×ÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÍÎÈÔ×ÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÈÍÈÔ×ÉÍÇÈÔóÈÛÌÌ×ÛÊÉ ÈÔÛÈÈÔ×É×ÍÖÖÉÓÈ××ÛÉ×Ï×ÎÈÉÛÊ×Ú×ÓÎÕÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÓÎÍÊØ×ÊÈÍÕÓÆ×ÈÔ× ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÛØ×ËÇÛÈ×ÛÙÙ×ÉÉÈÍÉÈÊ××ÈÉÛÎØÇÈÓÐÓÈÓ×É Drainage: èÔ×ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÓÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ðÓÙÑùÊ××ÑøÊÛÓÎÛÕ×úÛÉÓÎöÇÈÇÊ× Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÍÖÈÔ×ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÈÊÛÙÈÅÓÐÐÚ×Ê×ËÇÓÊ×ØÈÍÏ××ÈÈÔ×ÏÓÎÓÏÇÏ ÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÍÖÈÔ×ùÓÈêÉøÊÛÓÎÛÕ×õÇÓØ×ÐÓÎ×É Flood Plain: èÔÓÉÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÓÉÎÍÈÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎö÷ïûØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØÖÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎ Oversize Request: îÍÎ×ÑÎÍÅÎÛÈÈÔÓÉÈÓÏ× Parkland Dedication Fees: îÍÎ×Ê×ËÇÓÊ×ØÛÈÈÔÓÉÈÓÏ× Impact Fees: èÔ×ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÓÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×õÊÛÔÛÏéÛÎÓÈÛÊÃé×Å×ÊóÏÌÛÙÈ ö××ûÊ×ÛÅÔÓÙÔÓÉ   ðç÷ REVIEW CRITERIA Compliance with Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance: èÔ× ùÍÏÌÊ×Ô×ÎÉÓÆ×ìÐÛÎØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ÉÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×Ðà ÍÖÈÔ×Å×ÉÈ×ÊÎÌÍÊÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔÓÉÈÊÛÙÈÛÉ ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐûÈÈÛÙÔ×ØÅÓÈÔÈÔ×Ê×ÏÛÓÎØ×ÊÍÖÈÔ×ÈÊÛÙÈØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØÛÉóÎØÇÉÈÊÓÛÐêøèÔ× ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÅÛÉÂÍÎ×ØêûÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈï×ØÓÇÏø×ÎÉÓÈÃÉÔÍÊÈÐÃÛÖÈ×ÊÓÈÅÛÉÛÎÎ×Ä×ØÓÎ  óÎ ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕâÍÎÓÎÕï××ÈÓÎÕìÛÕ× ÍÖ ûÇÕÇÉÈ    ÈÔ×ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÈÊÛÙÈÅÛÉÊ×ÂÍÎ×ØÖÊÍÏêûÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈï×ØÓÇÏø×ÎÉÓÈÃÈÍï ðÓÕÔÈ óÎØÇÉÈÊÓÛÐèÔ×ÌÐÛÈÙÍÏÌÐÓ×ÉÅÓÈÔÈÔ×Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉÍÖÛÎï ÐÍÈ Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: èÔ×ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÓÉÐÛÎØÐÍÙÑ×ØÛÎØÛÉ ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÈÔ×ÌÊ×ÐÓÏÓÎÛÊÃÌÐÛÈÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÉÛÆÛÊÓÛÎÙ×ÈÍé×ÙÈÓÍÎõ ê×ÐÛÈÓÍÎÈÍûØÒÍÓÎÓÎÕ éÈÊ××ÈéÃÉÈ×ÏÉÅÔÓÙÔÊ×ËÇÓÊ×ÉÈÔ×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÉÈÊ××ÈÉÓÎÈÍÛÊ×ÛÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ÎÍÈÉÇÚØÓÆÓØ×Ø èÔ×ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÎÈÓÉÊ×ËÇ×ÉÈÓÎÕÈÍÆÛÊÃÖÊÍÏÈÔ×Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÍÎÈÔ×ÚÛÉÓÉÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈà ÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕÈÔ×ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÈÊÛÙÈÓÉÛÐÊ×ÛØÃØ×Æ×ÐÍÌ×ØÛÎØÎÍÉÈÊ××ÈÉÅ×Ê×ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ×ØÈÍÈÔ×ÈÊÛÙÈ èÔ×ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÎÈÔÛÉÛÐÉÍÊ×ËÇ×ÉÈ×ØÛÆÛÊÓÛÎÙ×ÈÍé×ÙÈÓÍÎò úÐÍÙÑð×ÎÕÈÔÅÔÓÙÔÉÈÛÈ×É ÈÔÛÈÚÐÍÙÑÐ×ÎÕÈÔÉÔÛÐÐÎÍÈ×ÄÙ××Ø Ö××ÈèÔ×ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÎÈÓÉÊ×ËÇ×ÉÈÓÎÕÛÚÐÍÙÑÐ×ÎÕÈÔÍÖ  Ö××ÈÛÎØÔÛÉÊ×ËÇ×ÉÈ×ØÈÍÆÛÊÃÖÊÍÏÈÔÓÉÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÍÎÈÔ×ÚÛÉÓÉÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕ ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÓÉÛÐÊ×ÛØÃØ×Æ×ÐÍÌ×ØÛÎØÈÔÛÈÈÔ×Ê×ÓÉÎÍÈÛÎ××ØÖÍÊÌÇÚÐÓÙÉÈÊ××ÈÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÛÎ ÓÎØÇÉÈÊÓÛÐÇÉ×ÉÇÚØÓÆÓÉÓÍÎ óÎÛÙÙÍÊØÛÎÙ×ÅÓÈÔÈÔ×éÇÚØÓÆÓÉÓÍÎê×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÅÔ×ÎÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÓÎÕÈÔ×ÆÛÊÓÛÎÙ×ÉÈÔ× ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕÛÎØâÍÎÓÎÕùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÔÍÇÐØÏÛÑ×ÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÖÓÎØÓÎÕÉÈÍÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ÈÔ× ÆÛÊÓÛÎÙ×É èÔÛÈÈÔ×Ê×ÛÊ×ÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÙÓÊÙÇÏÉÈÛÎÙ×ÉÍÊÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉÛÖÖ×ÙÈÓÎÕÈÔ×ÐÛÎØÓÎÆÍÐÆ×ØÉÇÙÔ ÈÔÛÈÉÈÊÓÙÈÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎÉÍÖÈÔÓÉÙÔÛÌÈ×ÊÅÓÐÐØ×ÌÊÓÆ×ÈÔ×ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÎÈÍÖÈÔ× Ê×ÛÉÍÎÛÚÐ×ÇÉ×ÍÖÔÓÉÐÛÎØ èÔÛÈÈÔ×ÆÛÊÓÛÎÙ×ÉÛÊ×Î×Ù×ÉÉÛÊÃÖÍÊÈÔ×ÌÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØ×ÎÒÍÃÏ×ÎÈÍÖÛÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐ ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÊÓÕÔÈÍÖÈÔ×ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÎÈ èÔÛÈÈÔ×ÕÊÛÎÈÓÎÕÍÖÈÔ×ÆÛÊÓÛÎÙ×ÉÅÓÐÐÎÍÈÚ×Ø×ÈÊÓÏ×ÎÈÛÐÈÍÈÔ×ÌÇÚÐÓÙÔ×ÛÐÈÔÉÛÖ×Èà ÍÊÅ×ÐÖÛÊ×ÍÊÓÎÒÇÊÓÍÇÉÈÍÍÈÔ×ÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÓÎÈÔ×ÛÊ×ÛÍÊÈÍÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÓÎÛØÏÓÎÓÉÈ×ÊÓÎÕÈÔÓÉ ÙÔÛÌÈ×ÊÛÎØ èÔÛÈÈÔ×ÕÊÛÎÈÓÎÕÍÖÈÔ×ÆÛÊÓÛÎÙ×ÉÅÓÐÐÎÍÈÔÛÆ×ÈÔ××ÖÖ×ÙÈÍÖÌÊ×Æ×ÎÈÓÎÕÈÔ×ÍÊØ×ÊÐà ÉÇÚØÓÆÓÉÓÍÎÍÖÍÈÔ×ÊÐÛÎØÓÎÈÔ×ÛÊ×ÛÓÎÛÙÙÍÊØÛÎÙ×ÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎÉÍÖÈÔÓÉÙÔÛÌÈ×Ê åÓÈÔÈÔ××ÄÙ×ÌÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×Ê×ËÇ×ÉÈ×ØÆÛÊÓÛÎÙ×ÉÈÔ×ÌÐÛÈÓÉÓÎÙÍÏÌÐÓÛÎÙ×ÅÓÈÔÈÔ×éÇÚØÓÆÓÉÓÍÎ ê×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉ STAFF RECOMMENDATION óÖÈÔ×ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕâÍÎÓÎÕùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ÉÈÔ×Ê×ËÇ×ÉÈ×ØÆÛÊÓÛÎÙ×ÉÈÔ×ÎéÈÛÖÖ Ê×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÉÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐÍÖÈÔ×ÌÐÛÈ SUPPORTING MATERIALS ûÌÌÐÓÙÛÈÓÍÎ æÛÊÓÛÎÙ×ð×ÈÈ×Ê ùÍÌÃÍÖìÊ×ÐÓÏÓÎÛÊÃìÐÛÈÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÓÎÌÛÙÑ×È ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕâÍÎÓÎÕï××ÈÓÎÕìÛÕ×ÍÖ ûÇÕÇÉÈ    FINAL PLAT FOR POOHS PARK (FP-REPLAT) 08-00500103 SCALE: ÐÍÈÉÍÎ ÛÙÊ×É LOCATION: ðÍÈ úÐÍÙÑ ÍÖÈÔ×ìÍÍÔªÉìÛÊÑéÇÚØÓÆÓÉÓÍÎé×ÙÈÓÍÎíÎ× ÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÛÈ ÷ÛÉÈôÍÐÐ×ÏÛÎøÊÓÆ× ZONING: ù õ×Î×ÊÛÐùÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐ APPLICANT: ùÛÊÐÍÏÛÕÎÍéÇÊÆ×ÃÓÎÕ PROJECT MANAGER: ïÛÈÈêÍÚÓÎÉÍÎéÈÛÖÖìÐÛÎÎ×Ê ÏÊÍÚÓÎÉÍÎüÙÉÈÄÕÍÆ RECOMMENDATION: ûÌÌÊÍÆÛÐ ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕâÍÎÓÎÕùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎìÛÕ× ÍÖ  ûÇÕÇÉÈ    ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕâÍÎÓÎÕùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎìÛÕ× ÍÖ  ûÇÕÇÉÈ    DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation:  Zoning: ù õ×Î×ÊÛÐùÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐ Plat: ìÍÍÔªÉìÛÊÑéÇÚØÓÆÓÉÓÍÎé×ÙÈÓÍÎíÎ×   Site Development: ÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕæ×ÊÓÂÍÎùÍÏÏÇÎÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÙÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐÚÇÓÐØÓÎÕ COMMENTS Parkland Dedication: îÍÌÛÊÑÐÛÎØØ×ØÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÓÉÊ×ËÇÓÊ×Ø Streets: êÓÕÔÈÍÖÅÛÃØ×ØÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÍÖ ªÓÉÚ×ÓÎÕÕÓÆ×ÎÛÐÍÎÕðÛÉÉÓ×ðÛÎ×ÛÖÇÈÇÊ×ÏÛÒÍÊ ÙÍÐÐ×ÙÈÍÊÛÉÉÔÍÅÎÍÎÈÔ×ÈÔÍÊÍÇÕÔÖÛÊ×ÌÐÛÎóÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎ ªÊÓÕÔÈÍÖÅÛÃØ×ØÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÓÉÚ×ÓÎÕ ÕÓÆ×ÎÛÐÍÎÕôÍÐÐ×ÏÛÎøÊÓÆ×÷ÛÉÈÛÏÓÎÍÊÛÊÈ×ÊÓÛÐÛÉÉÔÍÅÎÍÎÈÔ×ÈÔÍÊÍÇÕÔÖÛÊ×ÌÐÛÎ REVIEW CRITERIA Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: èÔÓÉÌÐÛÈÓÉÓÎÙÍÏÌÐÓÛÎÙ×ÅÓÈÔÈÔ×éÇÚØÓÆÓÉÓÍÎ ê×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS éÈÛÖÖÊ×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÉÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐ SUPPORTING MATERIALS ûÌÌÐÓÙÛÈÓÍÎ ùÍÌÃÍÖöÓÎÛÐìÐÛÈÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÓÎÌÛÙÑ×È ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕâÍÎÓÎÕùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎìÛÕ× ÍÖ  ûÇÕÇÉÈ    COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR CAPSTONE COTTAGES AT FM 2818 (COMP) 08-00500136 REQUEST: óÎØÇÉÈÊÓÛÐ êøéÓÎÕÐ×öÛÏÓÐÃê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐðÍÅø×ÎÉÓÈÃÛÎØ öÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎéÈÊ×ÛÏÉÈÍìÐÛÎÎ×Øø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ SCALE:  ÛÙÊ×É LOCATION:  ôÛÊÆ×ÃïÓÈÙÔ×ÐÐìÛÊÑÅÛÃÕ×Î×ÊÛÐÐÃÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÍÌÌÍÉÓÈ×ÈÔ× ÓÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎÅÓÈÔôÍÐÐ×ÏÛÎøÊÓÆ× APPLICANT: úÊÇÙ×éÏÓÈÔèðéìÊÍÌ×ÊÈÓ×É PROJECT MANAGER: òÛÉÍÎéÙÔÇÚ×ÊÈûóùìéÈÛÖÖìÐÛÎÎ×Ê ÒÉÙÔÇÚ×ÊÈüÙÉÈÄÕÍÆ RECOMMENDATION: ûÌÌÊÍÆÛÐÅÓÈÔÈÔ××ÄÙ×ÌÈÓÍÎÈÔÛÈÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕöÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎéÈÊ×ÛÏÉ ÛÊ×ÛÊ×ÏÛÓÎÉÛÉØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØÛÎØÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÈÔÛÈÈÔ× ÌÇÊÌÍÉ×ÉÈÛÈ×Ï×ÎÈÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÓÎÈÔ×éÈÛÖÖê×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÛÈÓÍÎÛÈÈÔ× ×ÎØÍÖÈÔÓÉÊ×ÌÍÊÈÚ×ÓÎÙÍÊÌÍÊÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÍÈÔ×ÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ× ÕÇÓØÛÎÙ×ÓÎÈÔ×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈà ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕâÍÎÓÎÕùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎìÛÕ× ÍÖ ûÇÕÇÉÈ    ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕâÍÎÓÎÕùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎìÛÕ× ÍÖ ûÇÕÇÉÈ    ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕâÍÎÓÎÕùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎìÛÕ× ÍÖ ûÇÕÇÉÈ    ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕâÍÎÓÎÕùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎìÛÕ×ÍÖ ûÇÕÇÉÈ    NOTIFICATIONS ûØÆ×ÊÈÓÉ×ØùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎô×ÛÊÓÎÕøÛÈ×ûÇÕÇÉÈ   ûØÆ×ÊÈÓÉ×ØùÍÇÎÙÓÐô×ÛÊÓÎÕøÛÈ×ÉûÇÕÇÉÈ   èÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÎ×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÍÊÕÛÎÓÂÛÈÓÍÎÉÈÔÛÈÛÊ×Ê×ÕÓÉÈ×Ê×ØÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÍÖùÍÐÐ×Õ×éÈÛÈÓÍΪÉ î×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØé×ÊÆÓÙ×ÉÔÛÆ×Ê×Ù×ÓÆ×ØÛÙÍÇÊÈ×ÉÃÐ×ÈÈ×ÊÍÖÎÍÈÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔÓÉÌÇÚÐÓÙÔ×ÛÊÓÎÕ îÍÎ× ùÍÎÈÛÙÈÉÓÎÉÇÌÌÍÊÈîÍÎ× ùÍÎÈÛÙÈÉÓÎÍÌÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎîÍÎ× óÎËÇÓÊÃÙÍÎÈÛÙÈÉîÍÎ× ADJACENT LAND USES DirectionComprehensive Plan ZoningLand Use ôÛÊÆ×ÃïÓÈÙÔ×ÐÐ North èÔÍÊÍÇÕÔÖÛÊ×ôÓÕÔÅÛÃî û ìÛÊÑÅÛà èÔÍÊÍÇÕÔÖÛÊצïÛÒÍÊ î ûîøÍÅÐÓÎÕêÍÛØ ùÍÐÐ×ÙÈÍÊ South éÓÎÕÐ×öÛÏÓÐÃê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛЦ î û÷èòëÇÛÓÐêÇÎ÷ÉÈÛÈ×É ðÍÅø×ÎÉÓÈÃ ê ¦éÓÎÕÐ×æÛÙÛÎÈÖÇÈÇÊ×ùÓÈà öÛÏÓÐÃê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÉÇÚÉÈÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØ East óÎØÇÉÈÊÓÛÐ êø ÛÎØûí¦×ÄÌÛÎØ×ØÅÛÈ×Ê ûÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐíÌ×ÎÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×É ê¦ïÇÐÈÓÖÛÏÓÐà ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐûÈÈÛÙÔ×ØÛÎØø×Æ×ÐÍÌÓÎÕÛÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈ ÛÎØûí¦ öÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎéÈÊ×ÛÏÉÙÍÏÌÐ×Ä ûÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐíÌ×Î West è×ÄÛÉûïçÎÓÆ×ÊÉÓÈÃæÛÙÛÎÈ ùç¦ùÍÐÐ×Õ×ÛÎØ éÓÎÕÐ×öÛÏÓÐÃê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐèÔ×åÍÍØÐÛÎØÉ çÎÓÆ×ÊÉÓÈà ðÍÅø×ÎÉÓÈÃù×ØÛÊêÓØÕ× î û÷èò DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation:  ÖÍÊÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÛ ÖÍÍÈØ×ÌÈÔÛÐÍÎÕôÛÊÆ×ÃïÓÈÙÔ×ÐÐ ìÛÊÑÅÛà ÖÍÊÊ×ÏÛÓÎØ×ÊÈÔ×ÈÊÛÙÈ Zoning: ê ÖÍÊÛÊ×ÛÛÎÎ×Ä×ØÓÎ  ûíÖÍÊÛÊ×ÛÛÎÎ×Ä×ØÓÎ  Final Plat: çÎÌÐÛÈÈ×ØìÊ×ÐÓÏÓÎÛÊÃìÐÛÈÓÎö×ÚÊÇÛÊà  Site development: ðÛÊÕ×ÐÃÆÛÙÛÎÈÅÓÈÔÛÎÍÓÐÅ×ÐÐÓÎÈÔ×ÎÍÊÈÔ×ÛÉÈÙÍÊÎ×ÊÍÖÈÔ×ÉÓÈ× ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕâÍÎÓÎÕùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎìÛÕ×ÍÖ ûÇÕÇÉÈ    REVIEW CRITERIA Changed or changing conditions in the subject area or the City: óÎòÇÐà ÈÔ× ùÍÇÎÙÓÐÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ØÛÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÖÊÍÏóÎØÇÉÈÊÓÛÐ êøÛÎØöÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎéÈÊ×ÛÏÉÈÍ ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐûÈÈÛÙÔ×ØÛÎØöÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎéÈÊ×ÛÏÉÖÍÊÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×Ðà ÛÙÊ×ÉÖÍÊÈÔ×ÏÇÐÈÓ ÖÛÏÓÐÃØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÈÍÈÔ×Å×ÉÈÍÖÈÔ×ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈà èÔ×ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÓÉÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈÈÍôÛÊÆ×ÃïÓÈÙÔ×ÐÐìÛÊÑÅÛÃÛôÓÕÔÅÛÃÓÎÈÔÓÉÛÊ×ÛÍÎÈÔ× èÔÍÊÍÇÕÔÖÛÊ×ìÐÛÎóÎíÙÈÍÚ×Ê ÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÓÎÉÈÛÐÐ×ØÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÉÓÕÎÛÐÉÍÎôÛÊÆ×ÃïÓÈÙÔ×ÐÐ ìÛÊÑÅÛÃÛÈÈÔ×ÓÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉÅÓÈÔôÍÐÐ×ÏÛÎøÊÓÆ×ÛÎØðÇÈÔ×ÊéÈÊ××Èå×ÉÈóÎö×ÚÊÇÛÊÃÍÖ ÈÔÓÉÃ×ÛÊÈÔ×ùÍÇÎÙÓÐÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ØÛèÔÍÊÍÇÕÔÖÛÊ×ìÐÛÎûÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÎÈ ÅÔÓÙÔÊ×ÛÐÓÕÎÉòÍÎ×ÉúÇÈÐ×ÊêÍÛØÛïÛÒÍÊùÍÐÐ×ÙÈÍÊÖÊÍÏÓÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÎÕôÛÊÆ×ÃïÓÈÙÔ×ÐÐ ìÛÊÑÅÛÃÛÈÓÈÉÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÈÍÈÔ×ÓÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎôÍÐÐ×ÏÛÎøÊÓÆ×îøÍÅÐÓÎÕêÍÛØÛïÛÒÍÊ ùÍÐÐ×ÙÈÍÊÅÛÉÛÐÉÍÊ×ÛÐÓÕÎ×ØÈÍÈ×ÊÏÓÎÛÈ×ÓÎÈÍÈÔ×Ê×ÛÐÓÕÎ×ØòÍÎ×ÉúÇÈÐ×ÊêÍÛØÛÎØÖÍÊÏÛÈ ÓÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎèÔ×èÔÍÊÍÇÕÔÖÛÊ×ìÐÛÎÅÛÉÛÏ×ÎØ×ØØÇ×ÈÍèÄøíèÌÐÛÎÉÈÍÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÛ ÚÊÓØÕ×ÖÍÊôÛÊÆ×ÃïÓÈÙÔ×ÐÐìÛÊÑÅÛÃÍÆ×Êå×ÐÐÚÍÊÎêÍÛØÛÎØÈÔ×çÎÓÍÎìÛÙÓÖÓÙêÛÓÐÊÍÛØ èÔÓÉÖÇÈÇÊ××Ð×ÆÛÈ×ØÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÛÐÐÍÅÖÍÊòÍÎ×ÉúÇÈÐ×ÊêÍÛØÈÍÙÍÎÈÓÎÇ×ØÓÊ×ÙÈÐà ÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÛÉÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÃ×ÄÓÉÈÉ óÎïÛÃÍÖÈÔÓÉÃ×ÛÊùÍÇÎÙÓÐÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ØÛÎ×ÄÙÔÛÎÕ×ÍÖÛÚÍÇÈÛÙÊ×ÉÍÖÐÛÎØèÔÓÉ×ÄÙÔÛÎÕ× ÅÛÉÊ×ÐÛÈ×ØÈÍÔÍÅÈÔ×Ê×ÛÐÓÕÎ×ØÉÈÊ××ÈÉÓÎÈÔ×èÔÍÊÍÇÕÔÖÛÊ×ìÐÛÎÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÌÊ×ÆÓÍÇÉÐà Ï×ÎÈÓÍÎ×ØÛÖÖ×ÙÈ×ØùÓÈÃÌÐÛÎÉÖÍÊÛÎ×ÅÉÇÚÉÈÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØ×ÄÌÛÎÉÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÅÛÈ×Ê ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÓÎÈÔ×ÛÊ×ÛÛÎØÛÐÐÍÅ×ØÈÔ×ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÈÍÚ×ÏÍÊ×ÙÍÎÈÓÕÇÍÇÉ Compatibility with the remainder of the Comprehensive Plan: èÔ×ùÍÏÌÊ×Ô×ÎÉÓÆ×ìÐÛÎ ÉÈÛÈ×ÉÈÔ×óÎØÇÉÈÊÓÛÐ ê×É×ÛÊÙÔø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈÓÍÎÓÉÖÍÊ©Ï×ØÓÇÏÈÍÐÛÊÕ×ÉÙÛÐ× Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÍÖÈÛÄÕ×Î×ÊÛÈÓÎÕØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÉÉÇÙÔÛÉÓÎØÇÉÈÊÓÛÐ êøÌÛÊÑÉÈ×ÙÔÎÍÐÍÕà Ù×ÎÈ×ÊÉÙÐ×ÛÎÏÛÎÇÖÛÙÈÇÊÓÎÕÛÎØÛÉÉ×ÏÚÐà ØÓÉÈÊÓÚÇÈÓÍÎèÔ×É×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÉÛÊ×Æ×Êà Ø×Ì×ÎØ×ÎÈÇÌÍÎÕÍÍØÛÙÙ×ÉÉÈÍÔÓÕÔÅÛÃÉÊÛÓÐÐÓÎ×ÉÛÎØ ÍÊÛÓÊÌÍÊÈɨèÔ×ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈà ÓÉÐÛÊÕ×ÓÎÉÙÛÐ×ÛÎØÓÉÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÍÎÛÔÓÕÔÅÛÃÛÈÛÎ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÈÊÛÖÖÓÙÉÓÕÎÛÐÛÎØÓÉÓÎÊ×ÐÛÈÓÆ× ÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÈÍÈÔ×ÛÓÊÌÍÊÈóÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÈÔ×ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÐÓ×ÉÅÓÈÔÓÎÈÔ×Õ×Î×ÊÛÐÖÐÓÕÔÈÌÛÈÔÍÖ ÈÔ×É×ÙÍÎØÛÊÃÊÇÎÅÛÃÍÖ÷ÛÉÈÅÍÍØûÓÊÌÍÊÈûÎÍÓÐÅ×ÐÐÓÉÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÃÐÍÙÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ÎÍÊÈÔ×ÛÉÈ ÙÍÊÎ×ÊÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÛÎØÛÖÇÈÇÊ××Ð×ÙÈÊÓÙÉÇÚÉÈÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØ×ÄÌÛÎØ×ØÅÛÈ×ÊÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÛÊ× ÛÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×Ø×ÛÉÈÍÖÈÔ×ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃùÍÎÆ×ÊÉ×ÐÃÈÔ×ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÓÉÛÐÉÍÓÎÙÐÍÉ× ÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÈÍëÇÛÓÐêÇÎ÷ÉÈÛÈ×ÉÛÎØèÔ×åÍÍØÐÛÎØÉÉÇÚØÓÆÓÉÓÍÎÉÚÍÈÔÉÓÎÕÐ×ÖÛÏÓÐà Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÉÅÓÈÔÐÍÈÉÍÖÛÈÐ×ÛÉÈÍÎ×ÛÙÊ×ÓÎÉÓÂ× èÔ×ìÐÛÎÎ×Øø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈÓÍÎÅÛÉÛØØ×ØÈÍÈÔ×ùÍÏÌÊ×Ô×ÎÉÓÆ×ìÐÛÎÓÎ ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ×ÛØÍÌÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔשíÌÌÍÊÈÇÎÓÈÓ×ÉÖÍÊïÓÄ×ØçÉ×ÓÎùÍÐÐ×Õ×éÈÛÈÓÍΨÉÈÇØÃûÉÉÈÛÈ×ØÓÎÈÔ× ÉÈÇØÃìÐÛÎÎ×Øø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ©ÓÉÈÍÚ×ÇÉ×ØÅÔ×Ê×ÐÛÊÕ×ÛÊ×ÛÉÍÖÐÛÎØÏÛÃÚ×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌ×Ø ÅÓÈÔÛÏÓÄÍÊÙÍÐÐ×ÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÇÉ×ÉÚÇÈÎÍÈÎ×Ù×ÉÉÛÊÓÐÃÛÏÓÄ×ØÇÉ×ÌÛÈÈ×ÊÎèÔ×ÌÐÛÎÎ×Ø Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÙÛÈ×ÕÍÊÃ×ÏÌÔÛÉÓÂ×ÉÈÔ×Î××ØÈÍÏÛÉÈ×ÊÌÐÛÎÈÔ×ÛÊ×ÛÈÍ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ× ÌÐÛÙ×Ï×ÎÈÍÖØÓÖÖ×Ê×ÎÈÇÉ×ÉèÔ×ìøøÂÍÎÓÎÕØÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÉÏÛÃÚ×ÈÔ×Ú×ÉÈÛÌÌÊÍÛÙÔÖÍÊÂÍÎÓÎÕ ÖÍÊØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÓÎÈÔ×É×ÛÊ×ÛÉèÔ×ÛÌÌÊÍÛÙÔÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÉÏÛÄÓÏÇÏÖÐ×ÄÓÚÓÐÓÈÃÖÍÊÈÔ×ÏÛÊÑ×È ÛÎØØ×Æ×ÐÍÌ×ÊÅÔÓÐ××ÎÉÇÊÓÎÕÛÙÍÏÌÛÈÓÚÐ×ÌÛÈÈ×ÊÎÍÖÇÉ×É èÔ×öÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎéÈÊ×ÛÏÉØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈÓÍÎÍÊÓÕÓÎÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ùÍÏÌÊ×Ô×ÎÉÓÆ×ìÐÛÎÓÎ ÛÎØ ÓÉÓÎÈ×ÎØ×ØÈÍÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÈÔ×ö÷ïû Ã×ÛÊÖÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎÖÊÍÏØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÌÐÇÉÌÊÍÆÓØ× ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÛÊ×ÛÉÈÍÚ×Ê×É×ÊÆ×ØÖÍÊÍÌ×ÎÉÌÛÙ×èÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÊ×ÏÍÆ×É öÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎéÈÊ×ÛÏÉÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÙÍÎÆ×ÊÈÓÎÕÓÈ×ÎÈÓÊ×ÐÃÈÍÛìÐÛÎÎ×Øø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ Ø×ÉÓÕÎÛÈÓÍÎåÓÈÔìÐÛÎÎ×Øø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÍÎÈÔ×ùÍÏÌÊ×Ô×ÎÉÓÆ×ìÐÛÎðÛÎØçÉ×ïÛÌÛ ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕâÍÎÓÎÕùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎìÛÕ×ÍÖ ûÇÕÇÉÈ    ÌÐÛÎÎ×ØÂÍÎÓÎÕØÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÊ×ËÇ×ÉÈÅÓÐÐÚ×Ê×ËÇÓÊ×ØÈÍÊ×ÂÍÎ×ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃèÔ×É×ÈÃÌ×ÉÍÖ Ê×ÂÍÎÓÎÕÉÛÊ×ÛÙÙÍÏÌÛÎÓ×ØÚÃÛÙÍÎÙ×ÌÈÌÐÛÎÈÔÛÈÓÐÐÇÉÈÊÛÈ×ÈÔ×Õ×Î×ÊÛÐÊ×ÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÔÓÌÍÖ ÉÈÊ××ÈÉÚÇÓÐØÓÎÕÉÛÎØÇÉ×ÉÌÛÊÑÓÎÕÍÌ×ÎÉÌÛÙ×ÉÚÇÖÖ×ÊÉÛÎØÍÈÔ×ÊÖ×ÛÈÇÊ×ÉèÔÛÈÙÍÎÙ×ÌÈ ÌÐÛÎÅÓÐÐÈÔ×ÎÉ×ÊÆ×ÛÉÈÔ×ÚÛÉÓÉÖÍÊÊ×ÆÓ×ÅÍÖÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÉÓÈ×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈåÔ×ÎÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ×öÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎéÈÊ×ÛÏÉØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈÓÍÎÓÉÊ×ÂÍÎ×ØÈÔ×Õ×Î×ÊÛÐÌÍÐÓÙÃÓÉÈÍÌÊ×É×ÊÆ×ÈÔ× ÛØÍÌÈ×Øö÷ïû Ã×ÛÊÖÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎÛÊ×ÛÛÐÍÎÕÅÓÈÔÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÛÊ×ÛÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×ØÍÎÈÔ× õÊ××ÎÅÛÃÉïÛÉÈ×ÊìÐÛÎÛÉÛÎûíûÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐíÌ×ÎÂÍÎÓÎÕØÓÉÈÊÓÙÈèÔÓÉÔ×ÐÌÉÌÊ×É×ÊÆ×ÓÈ ÛÉÛÎÛÈÇÊÛÐØÊÛÓÎÛÕ×ÛÊ×ÛÛÎØÛÐÐÍÅÓÈÈÍÊ×ÏÛÓÎÛÉÍÌ×ÎÉÌÛÙ× åÓÈÔìÐÛÎÎ×Øø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÍÎÈÔ×ðÛÎØçÉ×ìÐÛÎÓÈÓÉÓÏÌÍÊÈÛÎÈÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÛÎ ÍÇÈÐÓÎ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÈÃÌ×ÉÍÖÌ×ÊÏÓÈÈ×ØÇÉ×ÉÈÔ×ÓÊÊ×ÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÔÓÌÈÍÍÎ×ÛÎÍÈÔ×ÊÛÎØÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈ ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÓ×ÉÛÎØÍÈÔ×ÊÙÔÛÊÛÙÈ×ÊÓÉÈÓÙÉÈÔÛÈÖÊÛÏ×ÈÔ×ÇÎÓËÇ×ÎÛÈÇÊ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÛÊ×ÛûÉÌÛÊÈÍÖÈÔ× ÛÈÈÛÙÔ×ØÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÐ×ÈÈ×ÊÈÔ×ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÎÈÉÈÛÈ×ÉÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØðÛÎØçÉ×ûÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÓÉÈÍ ÛÐÐÍÅÛ©ÏÛÉÈ×ÊÌÐÛÎÎ×ØÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃáÈÔÛÈßÅÓÐÐÙÍÎÉÓÉÈÍÖÛÙÍÈÈÛÕ×ÙÍÎÙ×ÌÈÖ×ÛÈÇÊÓÎÕÛÊÈÉ ÙÊÛÖÈÉÓÎÉÌÓÊ×ØÛÊÙÔÓÈ×ÙÈÇÊ×ÉÈÃÐ×ÅÓÈÔÙÍÈÈÛÕ×ÏÛÎÍÊÔÍÏ×ÐÍØÕ×ÛÎØØÇÌÐ×ÄÇÎÓÈÉèÔ×Ê× ÅÓÐÐÚ×ÛÊ×ÉÍÊÈÉÈÃÐ×ÙÐÇÚÔÍÇÉ×ÌÍÍÐÛÎØÐÛÊÕ×ÍÌ×ÎÉÌÛÙ×ÕÊ××ÎÛÊ×ÛÉÅÓÈÔÛÐÐÙÍÈÈÛÕ×ÉÉ×È ÍÎÌÊÓÆÛÈ×ÉÈÊ××ÈÉÙÍÎÈÛÓÎ×ØÅÓÈÔÓÎÛÕÛÈ×ØÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃóÎÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÈÔ×Ê×ÅÓÐÐÚ×Û Î×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÉÈÃÐ×Ê×ÈÛÓÐÙ×ÎÈ×ÊÈÍÉ×ÊÆ×ÈÔ×ÙÍÈÈÛÕ×ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÛÎØÈÔ×ÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕ Î×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØɨèÔÓÉÉÈÛÈ×Ï×ÎÈÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÉÛÕÍÍØØ×ÉÙÊÓÌÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÈÔ× ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÎÈÓÉÇÐÈÓÏÛÈ×ÐÃÌÊÍÌÍÉÓÎÕÚÇÈÓÉÏÍÊ×Ø×ÈÛÓÐ×ØÈÔÛÎÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ÖÍÊùÍÏÌÊ×Ô×ÎÉÓÆ× ìÐÛÎØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈÓÍÎÉÅÔÓÙÔÛÊ×ÓÎÈ×ÎØ×ØÈÍÚ×Ê×ÐÛÈÓÆ×ÐÃÕ×Î×ÊÛÐÓÎÎÛÈÇÊ×úÛÉ×ØÍÎÈÔ×ÛÚÍÆ× Ø×ÉÙÊÓÌÈÓÍÎÛÎØÇÉÓÎÕÈ×ÊÏÉØ×ÖÓÎ×ØÓÎÈÔ×çÎÓÖÓ×Øø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈíÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉÛÐ ÙÛÎÚ×ÉÇÏÏÛÊÓÂ×ØÛÉÛÏÇÐÈÓÖÛÏÓÐÃØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕÉÓÎÕÐ×Ø×ÈÛÙÔ×ØÇÎÓÈÉ ØÇÌÐ×Ä×ÉÛÎØÉ×Æ×ÊÛÐÇÎÓÈÉÌ×ÊÚÇÓÐØÓÎÕÛÎØÎ×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÙÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐÈÔÛÈÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÉÈÔ× Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÛÎØÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕÎ×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÉûÏ×ÎÓÈÓ×ÉÍÌ×ÎÉÌÛÙ×ÛÎØÚÇÖÖ×ÊÛÊ×ÛÉÛÊ× ÓÎÈ×ÕÊÛÐÈÍÈÔ×Ê×ÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÔÓÌÍÖÈÔ×É×ÇÉ×ÉÈÍ×ÛÙÔÍÈÔ×ÊÈÔ×ÎÛÈÇÊÛÐØÊÛÓÎÛÕ×ÛÊ×ÛÉÍÎÈÔ× ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÛÎØÈÔ×ÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕÐÍÅØ×ÎÉÓÈÃÉÓÎÕÐ×ÖÛÏÓÐÃÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÎ×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÉ STAFF RECOMMENDATION õÓÆ×ÎÈÔ×ÖÛÙÈÉÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÛÎØ×ÆÛÐÇÛÈÓÍÎØ×ÉÙÊÓÚ×ØÛÚÍÆ×éÈÛÖÖÊ×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÉÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐÍÖÈÔ× Ê×ËÇ×ÉÈÈÍìÐÛÎÎ×Øø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÅÓÈÔÈÔ××ÄÙ×ÌÈÓÍÎÈÔÛÈÈÔ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕöÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎéÈÊ×ÛÏÉÛÊ×Û Ê×ÏÛÓÎÉÛÉØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×ØèÔÍÇÕÔóÎØÇÉÈÊÓÛÐ êøÏÛÃÉÈÓÐÐÚ×ÛÉÇÓÈÛÚÐ×ÐÍÎÕÈ×ÊÏÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÖÍÊ ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØìÐÛÎÎ×Øø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÛÐÐÍÅÉÖÍÊÛÏÓÄÈÇÊ×ÍÖÏÇÐÈÓÖÛÏÓÐÃÛÎØ Î×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÙÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐÇÉ×ÉÈÔÛÈÙÛÎÚ×ÏÍÊ×ÓÎÈ×ÕÊÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÇÉ×É çÉÓÎÕÈÔ×ÉÈÛÈ×Ï×ÎÈÉÛÚÍÆ×ÛÉÅ×ÐÐÛÉÍÈÔ×ÊÉÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÓÎÈÔ×ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÎȪÉÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÐ×ÈÈ×ÊÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐ ÓÉÛÐÉÍÊ×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØ×ØÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕÌÇÊÌÍÉ×ÉÈÛÈ×Ï×ÎÈÚ×ÓÎÙÐÇØ×ØÓÎÈÔ× ÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÕÇÓØÛÎÙ×ÈÍØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈéèÔ×ÌÇÊÌÍÉ×ÍÖÈÔÓÉìÐÛÎÎ×Ø ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈÓÍÎÓÉÖÍÊÛÏÇÐÈÓÖÛÏÓÐÃØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÈÔÛÈÏÛÃÙÍÎÉÓÉÈÍÖÉÓÎÕÐ×Ø×ÈÛÙÔ×Ø ÇÎÓÈÉØÇÌÐ×Ä×ÉÛÎØÛÈÈÛÙÔ×ØÇÎÓÈÉÛÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔÉÏÛÐÐÉÙÛÐ×Î×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÙÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐÇÉ×É ÌÐÛÙ×ØÛÐÍÎÕÈÔ×Ê×ÛÐÓÕÎ×ØòÍÎ×ÉúÇÈÐ×ÊêÍÛØÛÎØÓÎÊ×ÐÛÈÓÆ×ÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÈÍôÛÊÆ×ÃïÓÈÙÔ×ÐÐ ìÛÊÑÅÛÃÈÔÛÈÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÈÔ×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÛÎØÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕÎ×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÉê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÇÉ×ÉÛÊ×ÈÍ Ú×ÉÙÛÐ×ØÍÊÓ×ÎÈ×ØÛÎØÚÇÖÖ×Ê×ØÉÍÛÉÎÍÈÈÍÚ×ÓÎÈÊÇÉÓÆ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÉÇÊÊÍÇÎØÓÎÕÉÓÎÕÐ×ÖÛÏÓÐà Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÉîÛÈÇÊÛÐÛÊ×ÛÉÛÊ×ÈÍÚ×ÌÊ×É×ÊÆ×ØÛÎØÐÛÊÕ×ÍÌ×ÎÉÌÛÙ×ÕÊ××ÎÛÊ×ÛÉÛÊ×ÈÍÚ× ÌÊÍÆÓØ×ØÖÍÊÈÔ××ÖÖÓÙÓ×ÎÈÇÉ×ÍÖÐÛÎØÛÎØÈÍÉ×ÊÆ×ÛÉÛÎÛÏ×ÎÓÈÃÈÍÈÔ×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÌÊÍÆÓØ× Ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÍÌÌÍÊÈÇÎÓÈÓ×ÉÛÎØÌÊ×É×ÊÆ××ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕÆ×Õ×ÈÛÈÓÍÎÖÐÍÍØÌÐÛÓÎÛÎØØÊÛÓÎÛÕ×Ö×ÛÈÇÊ×ɨ SUPPORTING MATERIALS ûÌÌÐÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÅÓÈÔéÇÌÌÍÊÈð×ÈÈ×Ê ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕâÍÎÓÎÕùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎìÛÕ×ÍÖ ûÇÕÇÉÈ    è×ÄÛÉûÆ×ÎÇ×ìíúÍÄ  ùÍÐÐ×Õ×éÈÛÈÓÍÎè×ÄÛÉ  ìÔÍÎ×   öÛÄ  MEMORANDUM òÇÎ×   èíï×ÏÚ×ÊÉÍÖÈÔ×ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕâÍÎÓÎÕùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎ öêíïïÍÐÐÃôÓÈÙÔÙÍÙÑûóùììÐÛÎÎÓÎÕûØÏÓÎÓÉÈÊÛÈÍÊ Historic Preservation Enabling Ordinance éçúò÷ùè Item summary: ìÇÚÐÓÙÔ×ÛÊÓÎÕÌÊ×É×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ×ÛÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØØÓÉÙÇÉÉÓÍÎÍÎÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÈÍùÔÛÌÈ×Ê ùÓÈÃÍÖùÍÐÐ×Õ×éÈÛÈÓÍÎùÍØ×ÍÖíÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÉçÎÓÖÓ×Øø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈíÊØÓÎÛÎÙ× ûÊÈÓÙÐ× ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈê×ÆÓ×ÅúÍØÓ×ÉûÊÈÓÙÐ× ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈìÊÍÙ×ØÇÊ×Éé×ÙÈÓÍÎ  ÷ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔÏ×ÎÈÍÖøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÉûÊÈÓÙÐ×øÓÉÈÊÓÙÈìÇÊÌÍÉ×éÈÛÈ×Ï×ÎÈÉÛÎØéÇÌÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÐéÈÛÎØÛÊØÉ ûÊÈÓÙÐ× ÷ÎÖÍÊÙ×Ï×ÎÈÛÎØé×ÙÈÓÍÎ  ø×ÖÓÎ×Øè×ÊÏÉÛÉÈÔ×ÃÊ×ÐÛÈ×ÈÍÈÔ×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÛ ðÛÎØÏÛÊÑùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÛÎØôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙìÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎíÆ×ÊÐÛÃøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈ Item background: ûÈÈÔ×ØÓÊ×ÙÈÓÍÎÍÖùÓÈÃùÍÇÎÙÓÐéÈÛÖÖÔÛÉÚ××ÎÅÍÊÑÓÎÕÍÎÈÔ×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÛ ÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÌÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎ×ÎÛÚÐÓÎÕÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÈÔÛÈÓÉÓÎÈ×ÎØ×ØÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÖÍÊÈÔ×ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÛÎØ ÌÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÌÐÛÙ×ÉÛÎØÛÊ×ÛÉÍÖÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÛÎØÛÊÙÔÓÈ×ÙÈÇÊÛÐÓÏÌÍÊÈÛÎÙ×ÛÎØ ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÓÎùÍÐÐ×Õ×éÈÛÈÓÍÎåÔÓÐ×ÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐÃÙÍÐÐ×ÙÈÉÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØ Ê×ÙÍÕÎÓÂ×ÉÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÓ×ÉÅÓÈÔÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐÏÛÊÑ×ÊÉÈÔ×ÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÓÉÛÉÍÙÓÛÐÊ×ÙÍÕÎÓÈÓÍÎÛÎØ ØÍ×ÉÎÍÈÓÎÆÍÐÆ×ÛÙÈÇÛÐÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÛÙÈÓÍÎÉÈÔÛÈÙÔÛÎÕ×ÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃèÔÊÍÇÕÔÈÔ×ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÈÓÍÎ ÍÖÛôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙìÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎíÆ×ÊÐÛÃÂÍÎÓÎÕØÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÅÓÈÔÓÎÛôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙìÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎØÓÉÈÊÓÙÈ ÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÈÍÔÓÕÔ×ÊÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉÖÍÊÛÎØÕÊ×ÛÈ×ÊÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÊ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÛÐÈ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÊ×ÔÛÚÓÐÓÈÛÈÓÍÎ ûØÊÛÖÈ×ÎÛÚÐÓÎÕÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÖÊÍÏÈÔ×è×ÄÛÉôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎ×ÎÛÙÈ×ØÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÉÖÊÍÏ ÍÈÔ×Êè×ÄÛÉÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÓ×ÉØÓÉÙÇÉÉÓÍÎÉÅÓÈÔÈÔ×è×ÄÛÉôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÛÎØÍÈÔ×Ê ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÓ×ÉØÓÉÙÇÉÉÓÍÎÉÅÓÈÔÐÍÙÛÐÉÈÛÑ×ÔÍÐØ×ÊÉÛÎØÓÎÌÇÈÖÊÍÏÈÔ×ùÓÈêÉÙÍÎÉÇÐÈÛÎÈëÇÓÏÚà ïÙùÍÃôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙìÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎûÊÙÔÓÈ×ÙÈÇÊ×ÔÛÆ×ÛÐÐÙÍÎÈÊÓÚÇÈ×ØÈÍÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÖÍÊ ùÍÐÐ×Õ×éÈÛÈÓÍÎ óÎÉÇÏÏÛÊÃÈÔ×ôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙìÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎôìíÆ×ÊÐÛÃØÊÛÖÈÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÉÖÍÊÈÔ×ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕ Home of Texas A&M University  ûÎ×ÅÚÍÛÊØ ûðÛÎØÏÛÊÑùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÙÊ×ÛÈ×ØÈÍÌÊÍÆÓØ××ÄÌ×ÊÈÓÉ×Ê×ÕÛÊØÓÎÕÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÌÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎ ÛÉÓÈÊ×ÐÛÈ×ÉÈÍÂÍÎÓÎÕÛÎØØ×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈèÔ×ùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍΪÉÏÛÓÎØÇÈÓ×ÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÈÍÉÇÊÆ×ÃÛÎØ ÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÛÎÓÎÆ×ÎÈÍÊÃÍÖÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐÛÎØÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÓÎùÍÐÐ×Õ×éÈÛÈÓÍÎÛÙÈÓÎÛÎ ÛØÆÓÉÍÊÃÊÍÐ×ÓÎÊ×ÕÛÊØÉÈÍÈÔ×ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎÍÖÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÊ×ÉÍÇÊÙ×ÉÏÛÑ×Ê×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÛÈÓÍÎÉÈÍÈÔ× ìâÊ×ÕÛÊØÓÎÕÈÔ×ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÈÔ×ôìíÆ×ÊÐÛÃÏÛÑ×Ê×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÛÈÓÍÎÉÈÍÉÈÛÈ×ÛÎØÖ×Ø×ÊÛÐ ÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÉÊ×ÕÛÊØÓÎÕÎÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÊ×ÙÍÕÎÓÈÓÍÎÏÛÑ×Ê×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÛÈÓÍÎÉÈÍùÍÇÎÙÓÐ Ê×ÕÛÊØÓÎÕÈÔ×ÇÉ×ÍÖØÍÎÛÈ×ØÖÇÎØÉÈÍÌÊÍÏÍÈ×ÈÔ×ÇÉ×ÍÖôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙìÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎíÆ×ÊÐÛÃØÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÉ ÛÎØÛÙÈÇÌÍÎÊ×ËÇ×ÉÈÉÖÍÊù×ÊÈÓÖÓÙÛÈ×ÉÍÖûÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×Î×ÉÉÛÎØù×ÊÈÓÖÓÙÛÈ×ÉÍÖø×ÏÍÐÓÈÓÍÎ î×ÅÉÈÛÖÖÊ×ÉÌÍÎÉÓÚÓÐÓÈÓ×É ûÏ×ÏÚ×ÊÍÖùÓÈÃÉÈÛÖÖÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÈÔ×ùÓÈêÉôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙìÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎíÖÖÓÙ×Êôìíôìí Ê×ÉÌÍÎÉÓÚÓÐÓÈÓ×ÉÅÍÇÐØÓÎÙÐÇØ×ÛÙÈÓÎÕÛÉÈÔ×ÉÈÛÖÖÐÓÛÓÉÍÎÖÍÊÈÔ×ðÛÎØÏÛÊÑùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÛÎØ ÙÍÍÊØÓÎÛÈÓÎÕÈÔ×ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×ÉÍÖÈÔ×ùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÅÓÈÔÍÈÔ×ÊÌÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎÍÊÕÛÎÓÂÛÈÓÍÎÉèÔ×ôìí ÅÍÇÐØÊ×ÆÓ×ÅÛÎØÊ×ÌÍÊÈÍÎÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉÊ×ÐÛÈ×ØÈÍÈÔ×ôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙìÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎíÆ×ÊÐÛÃÛÎØÅÍÇÐØ ÛÉÉÓÉÈÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÎÈÉÅÔ×ÎÎ×Ù×ÉÉÛÊÃÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ÙÍÏÌÐ×ÈÓÍÎÍÖø×ÉÓÕÎÛÈÓÍÎê×ÌÍÊÈÉÖÍÊÊ×ÂÍÎÓÎÕ ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÈÓÍÎ ûÎ×ÅÍÆ×ÊÐÛÃÂÍÎÓÎÕØÓÉÈÊÓÙÈ ûôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙìÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎíÆ×ÊÐÛÃÂÍÎÓÎÕØÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÅÍÇÐØÚ××ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔ×ØÉÍÈÔÛÈÈÔ×ÕÍÛÐÍÖÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙ ÌÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎÙÍÇÐØÚ×ÖÍÊÅÛÊØ×ØÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÂÍÎÓÎÕÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎûÉÛÎÍÆ×ÊÐÛÃÛÙÈÇÛÐÐÛÎØÇÉ×É ÛÐÐÍÅ×ØÚÃÈÔ×ÚÛÉ×ÂÍÎÓÎÕØÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÅÍÇÐØÎÍÈÚ×ÛÖÖ×ÙÈ×ØÈÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ×ÈÔ×ÍÆ×ÊÐÛÃÙÍÇÐØÚ× ÛÌÌÐÓ×ØÈÍÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÛÉÅ×ÐÐÛÉÙÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐèÔ×ÍÆ×ÊÐÛÃÅÍÇÐØÌÊÍÆÓØ×ÖÍÊÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉ ÕÊ×ÛÈ×ÊÈÔÛÎÖÍÊÈÔÍÉ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÓ×ÉÅÓÈÔÎÍÍÆ×ÊÐÛÃèÔ×ÍÆ×ÊÐÛÃÙÍÇÐØÚ×ÛÌÌÐÓ×ØÈÍÛÉÓÎÕÐ× ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÛÕÊÍÇÌÍÖÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÓ×ÉÍÊÛÐÛÊÕ×ÊÛÊ×Û¥ÈÔ×Ê×ÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÎÍÏÓÎÓÏÇÏÍÊÏÛÄÓÏÇÏÛÊ×Û ÛÉÐÍÎÕÛÉÈÔ×ÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛÖÍÊØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈÓÍÎÅ×Ê×Ú×ÓÎÕÏ×È ûÉØÊÛÖÈ×ØÈÍÚ××ÐÓÕÓÚÐ×ÖÍÊÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖØ×ÉÓÕÎÛÈÓÍÎÛÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÍÊÕÊÍÇÌÍÖÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÓ×É ÅÍÇÐØÔÛÆ×ÈÍÚ×ÛÏÓÎÓÏÇÏÍÖ Ã×ÛÊÉÍÐØÏ××ÈÛÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛÍÖÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÛÎØ ÌÍÉÉ×ÉÉÓÎÈ×ÕÊÓÈÃèÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛÖÍÊÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÛÊ×ÛÉÖÍÐÐÍÅÉ ìÍÉÉ×ÉÉÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÙ×ÓÎÔÓÉÈÍÊÃÛÊÙÔÓÈ×ÙÈÇÊ×ÛÊÙÔ×ÍÐÍÕÃÛÎØÙÇÐÈÇÊ× óÉÛÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔ×Æ×ÎÈÉÈÔÛÈÔÛÆ×ÏÛØ×ÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÙÍÎÈÊÓÚÇÈÓÍÎÈÍÈÔ×ÚÊÍÛØÌÛÈÈ×ÊÎÉ ÍÖÐÍÙÛÐÊ×ÕÓÍÎÛÐÉÈÛÈ×ÍÊÎÛÈÓÍÎÛÐÔÓÉÈÍÊà óÉÛÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×ØÅÓÈÔ×Æ×ÎÈÉÈÔÛÈÔÛÆ×ÏÛØ×ÛÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÓÏÌÛÙÈÓÎÍÇÊÌÛÉÈ ÷ÏÚÍØÃÈÔ×ØÓÉÈÓÎÙÈÓÆ×ÙÔÛÊÛÙÈ×ÊÓÉÈÓÙÉÍÖÛÈÃÌ×Ì×ÊÓÍØÍÊÏ×ÈÔÍØÍÖÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ê×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÈÔ×ÅÍÊÑÍÖÛÏÛÉÈ×ÊØ×ÉÓÕÎ×ÊÚÇÓÐØ×ÊÍÊÙÊÛÖÈÉÏÛÎ ê×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÛÎ×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔ×ØÛÎØÖÛÏÓÐÓÛÊÆÓÉÇÛÐÖ×ÛÈÇÊ×ÍÖÈÔ×Î×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÍÊÙÓÈÃÛÎØ ÍÊ óÉ×ÐÓÕÓÚÐ×ÖÍÊÐÓÉÈÓÎÕÍÎÈÔ×îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐê×ÕÓÉÈ×ÊÍÖôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙìÐÛÙ×Éê×ÙÍÊØ×Øè×ÄÛÉôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙ ðÛÎØÏÛÊÑÍÊÛéÈÛÈ×ûÊÙÔÛ×ÍÐÍÕÓÙÛÐðÛÎØÏÛÊÑÛÉØ×È×ÊÏÓÎ×ØÚÃÈÔ×è×ÄÛÉôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐ ùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎ Home of Texas A&M University  èÃÌÓÙÛÐÐÃÛÊ×ÂÍÎÓÎÕÓÉÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÚÃÈÔ×ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕâÍÎÓÎÕùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÅÔÍÈÔ×ÎÉ×ÎØÉÈÔ×ÓÊ Ê×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÛÈÓÍÎÈÍùÓÈÃùÍÇÎÙÓÐóÈÓÉÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÈÔÛÈÛÊ×ËÇ×ÉÈÈÍÛÌÌÐÃÛôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙìÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎ íÆ×ÊÐÛÃÂÍÎÓÎÕØÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÅÍÇÐØÖÓÊÉÈÚ×ÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê×ØÚÃÈÔ×ðÛÎØÏÛÊÑùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÚ×ÖÍÊ×ÕÍÓÎÕÈÍ ÈÔ×ìâ ô×ÓÕÔÈ×Î×ØÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÖÍÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÓ×ÉÇÎØ×ÊÈÔ×ÍÆ×ÊÐÛà èÍ×ÎÉÇÊ×ÈÔ×ÓÎÈ×ÕÊÓÈÃÍÖÈÔ×ÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÆÛÐÇ×ÍÖÛÉÓÈ×ÆÓÊÈÇÛÐÐÃÛÐÐÙÔÛÎÕ×ÉÈÍÛÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÍÊ ÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÆÓÉÓÚÐ×ÖÊÍÏÛÌÇÚÐÓÙÊÓÕÔÈÍÖÅÛÃÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÈÍÊ×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ ùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÊ×ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎÊ×ÉÈÍÊÛÈÓÍÎÊ×ÔÛÚÓÐÓÈÛÈÓÍÎÛÎØÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÛÎØÙÍÐÍÊÙÔÛÎÕ×ÉÅÍÇÐØ Ú×ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈÈÍÈÔ×ðÛÎØÏÛÊÑùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍΪÉÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎÍÖÛù×ÊÈÓÖÓÙÛÈ×ÍÖûÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×Î×ÉÉ ùíûûÌÌ×ÛÐÉÈÍùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍΪÉØ×ÙÓÉÓÍÎÍÎÛùíûÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÈÍùÓÈÃùÍÇÎÙÓÐ ûÎÃÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØØ×ÏÍÐÓÈÓÍÎÍÊÊ×ÏÍÆÛÐÍÖÛÎÃÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÍÊÌÍÊÈÓÍÎÈÔ×Ê×ÍÖÅÍÇÐØÔÛÆ×ÈÍÍÚÈÛÓÎÛ ù×ÊÈÓÖÓÙÛÈ×ÍÖø×ÏÍÐÓÈÓÍÎùíøöÍÊÛùíøÈÍÚ×ÛÌÌÊÍÆ×ØÛÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÍÅÎ×ÊÅÍÇÐØÔÛÆ×ÈÍ ÌÊÍÆ×ÈÔÛÈ èÔ×ÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ÌÐÛÙ×ØÅÓÈÔÛÎ×ÅÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÈÔÛÈÓÉÏÍÊ×ÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×ÛÎØ ÙÍÏÌÛÈÓÚÐ×ÅÓÈÔÈÔ×ôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙìÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎíÆ×ÊÐÛÃØÓÉÈÊÓÙÈ îÍ×ÙÍÎÍÏÓÙÛÐÐÃÆÓÛÚÐ×ÇÉ×ÍÖÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃ×ÄÓÉÈÉ èÔ×ÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÌÍÉ×ÉÛÎÓÏÏÓÎ×ÎÈÈÔÊ×ÛÈÈÍÌÇÚÐÓÙÔ×ÛÐÈÔÍÊÉÛÖ×ÈÃÛÎØ ÍÊ èÔ×ÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ×ÓÉÎÍÎÙÍÎÈÊÓÚÇÈÓÎÕÈÍÈÔ×ôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙìÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎíÆ×ÊÐÛÃØÓÉÈÊÓÙÈ ìÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎÉÛÊ×ÛÐÉÍÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØÈÍÌÊ×Æ×ÎÈØ×ÏÍÐÓÈÓÍÎÚÃÎ×ÕÐ×ÙÈÍÖÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÓÎÈÔ×ÍÆ×ÊÐÛà éÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÌ×ÎÛÐÈÓ×ÉÖÍÊÎÍÎÙÍÏÌÐÓÛÎÙ× ûÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÔÛÈÆÓÍÐÛÈ×ÉÈÔ×ÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ÛÉÓÈÊ×ÐÛÈ×ÉÈÍùíûÉÛÎØùíøÉÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ô×ÐØÙÊÓÏÓÎÛÐÐà Ê×ÉÌÍÎÉÓÚÐ×ÖÍÊÈÔ×ÓÊÛÙÈÓÍÎÉèÔ×ÃÅÍÇÐØÚ×Ê×ËÇÓÊ×ØÈÍÊ×ÉÈÍÊ×ÍÊÊ×ÌÐÓÙÛÈ×ÈÔ×ØÛÏÛÕ×ÈÍÈÔ× ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÛÎØÖÓÎ×ÉÙÍÐÐ×ÙÈ×ØÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÖÍÊÅÛÊØ×ØÈÍÛôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙìÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎöÇÎØÈÔÛÈÅÍÇÐØÚ× ÇÉ×ØÈÍÌÊÍÏÍÈ×ÛÎØÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÌÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎÏ×ÛÉÇÊ×ÉÓÎÈÔ×ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈà éÈÛÖÖÔÍÉÈ×ØÈÅÍÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÏ××ÈÓÎÕÉÍÎö×ÚÊÇÛÊà  ÈÍÊ×Ù×ÓÆ×ÓÎÌÇÈÍÎÈÔ×ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÐÛÎÕÇÛÕ×èÔ×ÏÛÒÍÊÓÈÃÍÖÈÔÍÉ×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎÈÉÅ×Ê×ÓÎÕ×Î×ÊÛÐÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÖÍÊÈÔ×ÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×èÔ×Ê× Å×Ê×ÙÍÎÙ×ÊÎÉÛÚÍÇÈÈÔ×Ï×ÏÚ×ÊÉÔÓÌÍÖÈÔ×ðÛÎØÏÛÊÑùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÈÔÛÈÊ×ÉÇÐÈ×ØÓÎÙÔÛÎÕ×ÉÈÍ ÈÔ×ØÊÛÖÈèÔ×Ê×ÅÛÉÛÐÉÍÉÍÏ×ØÓÉÙÇÉÉÓÍÎÍÖÔÛÆÓÎÕÛÌ×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×ÍÖÔÍÏ×ÍÅÎ×ÊÉÛÌÌÐÃÖÍÊÛ ÐÛÊÕ×ÊØÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÉÓÏÓÐÛÊÈÍÛÎÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÖÍÊÛÉÓÎÕÐ×ÖÛÏÓÐÃÍÆ×ÊÐÛÃéÓÎÙ×ÈÔ×ôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙ ìÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎíÆ×ÊÐÛÃÙÍÇÐØÚ×ÛÌÌÐÓ×ØÈÍÍÎ×ÍÊÛÎÃÎÇÏÚ×ÊÍÖÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÓ×ÉÛÎØÚ×ÙÛÇÉ×ÈÔ× ÍÆ×ÊÐÛÃÅÍÇÐØÚ×ÈÔ×ÏÍÉÈÊ×ÉÈÊÓÙÈÓÆ×ÓÎÈÔ×ùÓÈÃÈÔ×ÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ×ØÊÛÖÈÅÛÉÐ×ÖÈÛÉÌÊÍÌÍÉ×ØóÖÛ ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÍÅÎ×ÊØÍ×ÉÎÍÈÅÛÎÈÈÍÌÇÊÉÇ×ÈÔ×ÍÆ×ÊÐÛÃÖÍÊÔÓÉ Ô×ÊÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃÈÔ×Ê×ÂÍÎÓÎÕÙÍÇÐØÚ× ÓÎÓÈÓÛÈ×ØÚÃùÓÈÃùÍÇÎÙÓÐÈÔ×ìâÍÊÈÔ×ûØÏÓÎÓÉÈÊÛÈÍÊ Attachments: 1. ìÊÍÌÍÉ×Øçøíé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ðÛÎØÏÛÊÑùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÎ×ÅçøíÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎ 2. ê×ØÐÓÎ×Øçøíé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ûØÏÓÎÓÉÈÊÛÈÍÊ 3. ê×ØÐÓÎ×Øçøíé×ÙÈÓÍÎ éÇÏÏÛÊÃÍÖê×ÆÓ×ÅûÇÈÔÍÊÓÈà 4. ê×ØÐÓÎ×Øçøíé×ÙÈÓÍÎ  õ×Î×ÊÛÐûÌÌÊÍÆÛÐìÊÍÙ×ØÇÊ×É 5. ê×ØÐÓÎ×Øçøíé×ÙÈÓÍÎ  âÍÎÓÎÕïÛÌûÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈê×ÂÍÎÓÎÕ Home of Texas A&M University  6. ìÊÍÌÍÉ×Øçøíé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ù×ÊÈÓÖÓÙÛÈ×ÉÍÖûÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×Î×ÉÉÎ×ÅçøíÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎ 7. ìÊÍÌÍÉ×Øçøíé×ÙÈÓÍÎ  ù×ÊÈÓÖÓÙÛÈ×ÉÍÖø×ÏÍÐÓÈÓÍÎÎ×ÅçøíÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎ 8. ê×ØÐÓÎ×Øçøíé×ÙÈÓÍÎ  úÇÓÐØÓÎÕì×ÊÏÓÈ 9. ê×ØÐÓÎ×Øçøíé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÷ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔÏ×ÎÈÍÖøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÉ 10. ìÊÍÌÍÉ×Øçøíé×ÙÈÓÍÎ ôÓÉÈÍÊÓÙìÊ×É×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎíÆ×ÊÐÛÃøÓÉÈÊÓÙÈÎ×ÅçøíÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎ 11. ìÊÍÌÍÉ×Øçøíé×ÙÈÓÍÎ éÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙì×ÎÛÐÈÓ×ÉÖÍÊù×ÊÈÓÖÙÛÈ×ÉÍÖûÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×Î×ÉÉÛÎØ ù×ÊÈÓÖÓÙÛÈ×ÉÍÖø×ÏÍÐÓÈÓÍÎÎ×ÅçøíÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎ ê×ØÐÓÎ×Øçøíé×ÙÈÓÍÎ  ø×ÖÓÎ×Øè×ÊÏÉ ïîò Home of Texas A&M University  Article 2. Development Review Bodies Section 2.4 Landmark Commission 2.4Landmark Commission A.Creation A Landmark Commission is hereby established by the City of College Station for the purpose of enhancing the City’s ability to identify and protect historically and/or culturally significant districts, areas, sites, buildings, and structures by bringing expertise from the community in those areas related to the designation of Historic Preservation Overlay Districts and protection of the contributing elements within them. B.Membership and Terms 1.The Landmark Commission shall consist of seven (7) regular members and two (2) alternate members. Six (6) of the regular members and the two (2) alternate members shall be appointed by the City Council. City Council shall apportion membership according to the following fields of expertise or specialized knowledge: a.One (1) member shall represent one of the following fields or professions: 1) History or 2) Archaeology b.Two (2) members shall be the owners of the following: 1) Property in the City of College Station Historic Marker Program or 2) Property within a Historic Preservation Overlay District. If no Historic Preservation Overlay District has yet been applied to property in the City of College Station, a property owner(s) of land platted prior to 1970 may be considered. c.Two (2) members shall represent any combination of the following fields or professions: 1) Architecture: an architect, previously registered architect, architect registered in another state, or professor in the field of architecture; 2) Landscape architecture: a landscape architect, previously registered landscape architect, landscape architect registered in another state, or professor in the field of landscape architecture; 3) Urban planning: a certified planner, previously certified planner, a planner with at least three (3) years of municipal planning experience, or professor in the field of urban planning; or 4) Historical preservation specialist: an experienced professional who provides technical and strategic expertise to promote the viability, reuse, and integrity of historic buildings and/or property. d.One (1) member shall represent one of the following fields or professions: 1) Banking, finance, or economics; 2) Real estate; or 3) Law. e. The two (2) alternates may represent any of the fields identified above in subsections a, b, c, or d. The seventh regular member shall be the Chairman of the Historic Preservation Advisory Committee or his designee. The City Council shall prioritize Landmark Commission candidates within each subsection above by their demonstrated expertise and interest in historic preservation. In the event any of the memberships assigned to a particular field of expertise or specialized knowledge identified above in subsections a, b, c, or d cannot be timely filled (in the judgment of the City Council) with a qualified candidate, the City Council  Article 2. Development Review Bodies Section 2.4 Design Review Board may appoint citizens-at-large that have demonstrated interest in historic preservation to fill such places. 2.Members shall be appointed for three-year terms or until their successors are appointed. Initially, one (1) member from subsection b and one (1) member from subsection c shall have terms of only one (1) year; the members of subsections a and d shall have terms of only two (2) years; and one member from subsection b and one member from subsection c shall have terms of three (3) years. After the initial appointments, two (2) members shall be appointed each year. 3.The Landmark Commission shall comply with the OMA. PEN EETINGS CT C.Officers, Meetings, Quorum 1.Officers A Chairperson shall be appointed annually by the City Council. The Commission shall select a Vice-Chair from among its members, as needed. 2.Meetings Members of the Landmark Commission shall meet monthly and the Chairperson shall designate the time and place of such meetings. All meetings of the Commission where a quorum is present shall be open to the public. 3.Quorum Four (4) members shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of any business. Any recommendation or decision which does not receive a majority of positive votes shall be deemed a negative report. 4.Rules of Proceeding The Landmark Commission shall adopt its own rules of procedure. 5.Minutes The Landmark Commission shall keep minutes of its proceedings, showing the vote, indicating such fact, and shall keep records of its examinations and other official actions, all of which shall be immediately filed in the office of the Administrator and shall be a public record. D.Powers and Duties The Landmark Commission shall have the following powers and duties: 1.Duties a.Review and approve surveys conducted and maintained by the City that include an inventory of significant historic, architectural, and cultural resources within the City of College Station according to guidelines established by the Texas Historical Commission; b.Utilize such surveys to identify potential property appropriate for the application of Historic Preservation Overlays; c.Review and approve surveys conducted and maintained by the City that include an inventory of all properties located within a Historic Preservation Overlay District within the City of College Station; d.Nominate properties to the National Register of Historic Places; e.Establish an ad hoc three-person Economic Review Panel when a property owner in a Historic Preservation Overlay District requests a Certificate of Demolition based on the reason that no economically viable use of the property exists. The Economic Review Panel must be comprised of three independent experts knowledgeable in one or more of the following fields: the economics of real estate, building renovation, or redevelopment. “Independent” as used in this  Article 2. Development Review Bodies Section 2.4 Landmark Commission subparagraph means that the expert has no financial interest in the property, its renovation, or redevelopment; is not an employee of the property owner; is not a city employee; is not a member of the Landmark Commission; and is not compensated for serving on the Economic Review Panel. The Economic Review Panel must consist of one person selected by the Landmark Commission, one person selected by the property owner, and one person selected by the first two appointees. If the first two appointees cannot agree on a third appointee within thirty (30) calendar days after submission of all of the required documentation supporting the application, the third appointee will be selected by the Administrator within five (5) days. Within thirty-five (35) calendar days after submission of all of the required documentation supporting the application, all appointments to the Economic Review Panel shall be made; a.Act in an advisory role to the City Council of the City of College Station, all appointed boards and commissions, and City departments regarding the protection of local historic, architectural, and cultural resources; b.Review and make recommendations to the appropriate County Historical Commission of all proposed National Registration nominations for properties within the City of College Station; and c.Prepare and submit annually to the City Council a report summarizing the work completed during the previous year. 2.Recommendations The Landmark Commission shall make recommendations to the Planning and Zoning Commission subject to the terms and conditions set forth for such uses in this UDO for the following: a.The effective coordination of the various City departments, committees, and boards, in implementing the Comprehensive Plan as it relates to historic preservation; b.The adoption of text amendments as they relate to the designation of Historic Preservation Overlay Districts and the processes and standards for properties within Historic Preservation Overlay Districts; and c.The designation of Historic Preservation Overlay Districts. The Landmark Commission shall make recommendations to the City Council for the following: a.The utilization of state, federal, or private funds to promote the preservation of Historic Preservation Overlay Districts within the City of College Station, and b.The acceptance of the dedication of Historic Preservation Easements for the purpose of historic preservation. 3.Final Action The Landmark Commission shall hear and take final action on the following: a.Applications for Certificates of Appropriateness, b.Applications for Certificates of Demolition, and c.Certifications of properties of Demolition by Neglect, notices to owners of certified Demolition by Neglect properties, and referrals for enforcement. E. Staff The Administrator shall provide staff, including a Historic Preservation Officer, as needed, to the Landmark Commission.  Article 2. Development Review Bodies Section 2.5 Administrator 2.6Administrator A.Designation The City Manager shall designate the Administrator for the City of College Station. Where this UDO assigns a responsibility, power, or duty to the Administrator, the Administrator may delegate that responsibility, power, or duty to any other agent or employee of the City whom the Administrator may reasonably determine. B.Powers and Duties The Administrator shall have the following powers and duties: 1.Administration and Enforcement The Administrator shall administer and enforce the provisions of this UDO. 2.Interpretation The Administrator is responsible for interpreting the provisions of this UDO and the provisions of C9CCSCO(S HAPTER OF THE ITY OF OLLEGE TATION ODE OF RDINANCES UBDIVISION R). The Administrator shall make written interpretations of this UDO and EGULATIONS SR, when requested, setting forth the reasons and explanation UBDIVISION EGULATIONS therefore. 3.Building Permits The Administrator shall review and certify that the proposed construction, moving, alteration, or use of the land either does or does not comply with the provisions of this UDO prior to issuance of a Building Permit by the Building Official. 4.Final Action The Administrator shall review and take final action on the following: a.Sign permits; b.Site plans (not Wolf Pen Creek District site plans); c.Administrative adjustments; d.Minor and amending plats; e.Determination of building plot (Section 7.1, General Provisions); f.Minor Wolf Pen Creek District projects; g.Amendments to the color palette for Northgate roof colors; h.Certificate of Appropriateness Routine Maintenance Work reviews; and i.Alternative parking plans (Section 7.2, Off-Street Parking). 5.Other Duties The Administrator, or his designee, shall serve as the Historic Preservation a. Officer (HPO) for the City of College Station. As such, the HPO shall serve as a representative of the Landmark Commission and shall be responsible for coordinating the Landmark Commission’s preservation activities with the Historic Preservation Advisory Committee, those of state and federal agencies, and with local, state, and national nonprofit preservation organizations. The Administrator shall perform other duties imposed under the provisions b. of the CCSCO, as amended from time- ITY OF OLLEGETATIONODE OF RDINANCES to-time.  Article 2. Development Review Bodies Section 2.8 Summary of Review Authority 2.9Summary of Review Authority The following table summarizes the authority of the various review bodies and staff. PROCEDURE CCP&Z ZBADRB LCAdmin. BODE CITY COUNCIL (CC) Oversize Participation DR Development Agreement DRRR Conditional Use permit DRRR Zoning Map Amendment DRRR Zoning Map Amendment (HP) DRRR PDD / P-MUD Concept Plan DRRR Text Amendment DRRR Comp. Plan Amendment DRRR Impact Fee / CIP Priorities DR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION (P&Z) Zoning Map Amendment (HP) RRRR Master Plans DRRR Preliminary Plat DRRR Final Plat DRRR Development Plat DRRR Waiver of Subdivision Standard DRRR ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (ZBA) Variance DRRRRRR Administrative Appeal DR Zoning Map Interpretation D R DESIGN REVIEW BOARD (DRB) WPC District Site Plan ADR WPC District Building/Sign Review ADR WPC Parking Waivers ADR NG Waivers DR Non-Residential Arch. Standards Waiver DRR Gateway Grants ADRR LANDMARK COMMISSION (LC) Certificates of AppropriatenessADRR Certificates of Demolition ADRR ADMINISTRATOR Interpretation A** AD SignPermit AD Site Plan AA*D Administrative Adjustment AD WPC District Building or Sign, Minor AD Minor or Amending Plat ADR PD Concept Plan Minor Amend. AD NG Roof Color Palette Amendment AD Certificate of Appropriateness, Routine AD Alternative Parking Plans ADR BUILDING OFFICIAL (BO) Building Permit D Certificate of Occupancy RD Certificate of Completion RDR DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER (DE)  Article 2. Development Review Bodies Section 2.8 Summary of Review Authority Development Permit D Driveway Application AD Alternative Const. Material AD *Section 3.5.E. Site Plan Review Criteria and 3.6.E. Wolf Pen Creek Design District General Site Plan Review Criteria only. **Subdivision Regs. only. KEY: A=Appeal R=RecommendD=Final Action/Decision RR=Review/Report Per Ordinance No. 2981 (May 24, 2007) Per Ordinance No. 3007 (September 27, 2007)  Article 3. Development Review Procedures Section 3.1 General Approval Procedures Article 3. Development Review Procedures 3.1General Approval Procedures F.Required Public Notice 1.Summary of Notice Required Notice shall be required for development review as shown in the following table. Application Type PublishedMailedAgenda Posted Comprehensive Plan Amendment X X Zoning Map Amend. (Rezoning) X X X UDO Text Amendment X X Conditional Use Permit X X X Subdivision - Replats* X* X* X Design District - Site Plan/Bldg. X Certificate of Appropriateness X Certificate of Demolition (No X X X economically viable use) Variances – ZBA X X X Appeals – Site Plan & Driveway X Waiver – Subdivision Design X Waiver – Buffer Requirements X Administrative Appeals X X * Only when required per the Local Government Code. 2.Specific Notice Requirements Published Notice a. A Public Hearing Notice shall be placed by the Administrator at least once in the th official newspaper of the City before the 15 day before the date of the hearing for the purpose of notifying the public of the time and place of such public hearing and the substance of the public hearing agenda items that may be considered or reviewed. Per Ordinance No. 2906 (June 22, 2006) Mailed Notice b. A notice of public hearing shall be sent to owners of record of real property, as indicated by the most recently approved municipal tax roll, within 200 feet of the parcel under consideration. The notice may be served by its deposit in the th municipality, properly addressed with postage paid, in U.S. mail before the 15 day before the date of the hearing. Content of Notice c. A published or mailed notice shall provide at least the following specific information: The general location of land that is the subject of the application; 1) The substance of the application, including the magnitude of proposed 2) development and the current zoning district; The time, date, and location of the public hearing; and 3) A phone number to contact the City. 4) 3.Public Hearing Signs For the purpose of notifying the public, the Administrator may require the installation of a sign on the property prior to the public hearing. The specifications including size, location, and content of public hearing signs shall be established by the Administrator. 3-1  Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station, Texas Article 3. Development Review Procedures Section 3.1 General Approval Procedures 4.Required Public Hearings The following table illustrates the types of review requiring a public hearing and the review body responsible for conducting the hearing. Zoning LandmarkPlanning and City Application Type Board of Commission Zoning Council Adjustment Commission Comprehensive Plan Amendment XX Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning) XX Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning—Historic Preservation XXX Overlay District) Certificate of Demolition (No X economically viable use) UDO Text Amendment XX Conditional Use Permit XX Subdivision* X Variances – ZBA X Administrative Appeals X * Only when required per the LGC. OCALOVERNMENT ODE G.Simultaneous Processing of Applications Whenever two or more forms of review and approval are required under this UDO, the applications for those development approvals may, at the option of the Administrator, be processed simultaneously, so long as the approval procedures for each individual application can be completed pursuant to the requirements of this UDO. Such processing shall occur at the applicant’s own risk. H.Appeals An appeal of any final decision shall be filed with the appropriate entity within 30 days of the decision by the Administrator or the applicant. If no appeal is filed within 30 days, the decision shall be final. 3-2  Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station, Texas Article 3. Development Review Procedures Section 3.2 Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning) Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning) 3.2 A.Purpose To establish and maintain sound, stable, and desirable development within the territorial limits of the City, the Official Zoning Map may be amended based upon changed or changing conditions in a particular area or in the City generally, or to rezone an area or extend the boundary of an existing zoning district. All amendments shall be in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan, which may be amended according to the procedure in Section 3.19, Comprehensive Plan Amendment. B.Initiation of Amendments An amendment to the Official Zoning Map may be initiated by: 1.City Council on its own motion; 2.The Planning and Zoning Commission; 3.The Administrator; or 4.The property owner(s). C.Amendment Application A complete application for a zoning map amendment shall be submitted to the Administrator as set forth in Section 3.1.C, Application Forms and Fees. 1. Application requests for a Planned Development District (PDD) and Planned Mixed- Use District (P-MUD) shall provide the following additional information: a.A written statement of the purpose and intent of the proposed development; b.A list and explanation of the potential land uses permitted; and c.A concept plan as described in Section 3.4, Concept Plan Review (PDD and P- MUD Districts). Per Ordinance No. 2981 (May 24, 2007) 2.Application requests for a Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay District (NPO) shall provide the following additional information: a.An original plat of the subdivision; and b. A petition including dated signatures by sixty percent (60%) of current property owners in the subdivision in support of the overlay; and c. Contact information for all Neighborhood Association or Homeowners Association committee members. 3. Application requests for a Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (NCO) shall provide the following additional information: a.An original plat of the subdivision; b.A petition including dated signatures by sixty percent (60%) of the property owners in the subdivision in support of the overlay; c.Contact information for all Neighborhood Association or Homeowners Association committee members; d.A list of six (6) property owners in the neighborhood to serve on neighborhood stakeholder committee; and e.A checklist of the proposed items to be included in the Conservation Study. 4. Application requests for a Historic Preservation Overlay District shall provide the following additional information: a.An inventory and survey of structures to be included in the rezoning, submitted on a form provided by the Historic Preservation Officer; 3-1 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station, Texas  Article 3. Development Review Procedures Section 3.2 Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning) b.A current photograph of each property included in the rezoning, and its improvements; c.Historical photographs, where available; and d. A completed Designation Report. Upon initiation of the historic designation procedure, the Historic Preservation Officer shall coordinate research to compile a written report regarding the historical, cultural, and architectural significance of the place or area proposed for historic designation at the request of the applicant, but the rezoning application will not be considered complete until the report has been completed. A Designation Report shall include a statement on each of the following to the extent that they apply: 1.A listing of the architectural, archaeological, paleontological, cultural, economic, social, ethnic, political, or historical characteristics upon which the nomination is based; 2. A description of the historical, cultural and architectural significance of the structures and sites; 3. Identification of contributing and noncontributing resources to the proposed district; and 4. A description of the boundaries of the proposed Historic Preservation Overlay District, including subareas and areas where new construction will be prohibited. D.Approval Process 1.Preapplication Conference Prior to the submission of an application for a Zoning Map Amendment, all potential applicants shall request a Preapplication Conference with the Administrator. The purpose of the conference is to respond to any questions that the applicant may have regarding any application procedures, standards, or regulations required by this UDO. If the Administrator determines that the map amendment request is not in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan, he shall not accept the application for the map amendment, and no further processing shall occur until the map amendment is in conformity or a request for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan eliminating the lack of conformity has been submitted by the applicant. 2.Neighborhood Meeting Prior to the submission of an application for a Zoning Map Amendment for a NPO or NCO Overlay Rezoning, all potential applicants shall request a Neighborhood Meeting with City Staff. Prior to the submission of an application for a Zoning Map Amendment for a Historic Preservation Overlay District rezoning, all potential applicants shall request a Neighborhood Meeting with the Historic Preservation Officer. The purpose of the meeting is to present information about the proposed overlay and explain the process of rezoning to the neighborhood. 3.Review and Report by Administrator With the exception of applications for Historic Preservation Overlay Districts, once the application is complete, the Administrator shall review the proposed amendment to the Official Zoning Map in light of the Comprehensive Plan, subject to the criteria enumerated in Article 4, Zoning Districts, and give a report to the Planning and Zoning Commission on the date of the scheduled public hearing. 4. Review and Report by Historic Preservation Officer An application for a Historic Preservation Overlay District rezoning shall be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Officer, who shall review the proposed amendment in light of the Comprehensive Plan, subject to the criteria enumerated in Article 4, Zoning Districts, and Section 5.10 Historic Preservation Overlay District, and give a 3-2 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station, Texas  Article 3. Development Review Procedures Section 3.2 Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning) report to the Landmark Commission on the date of the scheduled public hearing. 5.Referral To Landmark Commission The Historic Preservation Officer, upon receipt of an application to amend the Official Zoning Map to an Historic Preservation Overlay District, shall refer the same to the Landmark Commission for study, hearing, and report. The Planning and Zoning Commission may not hold a public hearing or make a report to the City Council until it has received a report from the Landmark Commission. 6.Recommendation by Landmark Commission The Landmark Commission shall publish, post, and mail public notice in accordance with Section 3.1.F, Required Public Notice. The Landmark Commission shall hold a public hearing and make a recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Commission. 7.Referral To Planning and Zoning Commission With the exception of applications for Historic Preservation Overlay Districts, the Administrator, upon receipt of an application to amend the Official Zoning Map, shall refer the same to the Commission for study, hearing, and report. For a an application to amend the Official Zoning Map to an Historic Preservation Overlay District, the Historic Preservation Officer shall refer the same to the Planning and Zoning Commission for study, hearing, and report with the report of the Landmark Commission. The City Council may not enact the proposed amendment until the Planning and Zoning Commission makes its report to the City Council. 8.Recommendation by Planning and Zoning Commission The Planning and Zoning Commission shall publish, post, and mail public notice in accordance with Section 3.1.F, Required Public Notice. The Commission shall hold a public hearing and recommend to the City Council such action as the Commission deems proper. 9.City Council Action Notice a. The City Council shall publish, post, and mail public notice in accordance with Section 3.1.F, Required Public Notice, and hold a public hearing before taking final action on an application to amend the Official Zoning Map. PublicHearing b. The City Council shall hold a public hearing and approve, approve with modifications, or disapprove the application to amend the Official Zoning Map. Effect of Protest to Proposed Amendment c. If a proposed change to this UDO or rezoning is protested in accordance with Chapter 211 of the Texas Local Government Code, the proposed change must receive, in order to take effect, the affirmative vote of at least three-fourths of all members of the City Council. The protest must be written and signed by the owners of at least 20 percent of either the area of lots covered by the proposed change, or of the area of the lots or land immediately adjoining the area covered by the proposed change and extending 200 feet from that area. Review Criteria d. In determining whether to approve, approve with modifications, or disapprove the proposed Official Zoning Map amendment, the City Council shall consider the following matters regarding the proposed amendment: Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan; 1) Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby 2) property and with the character of the neighborhood; 3-3 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station, Texas  Article 3. Development Review Procedures Section 3.2 Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning) Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted 3) by the district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment; Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted 4) by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment; Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses 5) permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment; and Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation 6) facilities generally suitable and adequate for the proposed use. In addition, for proposed amendments to Historic Preservation Overlay 7) Districts, the City Council shall consider if the proposed amendment contains property(ies) and an environmental setting which meets two or more of the criteria for designation of a Historic Preservation Overlay District as described in Section 5.10.C Criteria for Designation of Historic Preservation Overlay Districts. Effect of Historic Preservation Overlay District Zoning Upon Official e. Public Records Upon designation of a property with a Historic Preservation Overlay District, the City Council shall cause the designation to be recorded in the Official Public Records of Real Property of Brazos County, Texas, the tax records of the City of College Station, and the Brazos County Appraisal District, as well as the official zoning map of the City of College Station. E.Limitation on Reapplication If an application for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for reclassification of the same property or any portion thereof shall not be considered within a period of 180 days from the date of denial, unless the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that one of the following factors are applicable: 1.There is a substantial change in circumstances relevant to the issues and/or facts considered during review of the application that might reasonably affect the decision-making body’s application of the relevant review standards to the development proposed in the application; 2.New or additional information is available that was not available at the time of the review that might reasonably affect the decision-making body’s application of the relevant review standards to the development proposed; 3.A new application is proposed to be submitted that is materially different from the prior application (e.g., proposes new uses or a substantial decrease in proposed densities and intensities); or 4.The final decision on the application was based on a material mistake of fact F.Repeal of a Single-Family Overlay District A repeal of a single-family overlay district may be initiated by: 1.City Council on its own motion; 2.The Planning and Zoning Commission; 3.The Administrator; or 4.By petition of sixty percent (60%) of the property owner(s) in the subject district. A repeal of a single-family overlay district is considered a rezoning and is subject to the Zoning Map Amendment requirements herein. 3-4 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station, Texas  Article 3. Development Review Procedures Section 3.9 Certificate of Appropriateness 3.9Certificate of Appropriateness A.Applicability 1. Prior to any construction, reconstruction, alteration, restoration, or Application rehabilitation of any structure or any property within a Historic Submittal Preservation Overlay District, or any material change in the light fixtures, signs, sidewalks, fences, steps, paving, or other exterior Staff Review elements visible from a public right-of-way that affects the appearance and cohesiveness of any structure or any property Completeness Review within a Historic Preservation Overlay District, an applicant must obtain a Certificate of Appropriateness in accordance with this Section. 2. No building permit shall be issued for proposed work within a Historic Preservation Overlay District until a Certificate of Landmark Appropriateness has first been issued as required by the UDO. The Commission Certificate of Appropriateness shall be in addition to and not in lieu of any building permit that may be required by any other ordinance of the City of College Station. B. Application Requirements A complete application for a Certificate of Appropriateness shall be submitted to the Administrator as set forth in Section 3.1.C., Application Forms and Fees. The application shall include, where applicable: 1.Detailed description of proposed work; 2.Proposed building plans (this will not constitute a building plan submittal for review for a building permit); 3.Landscaping plans showing landscaping features and vegetation species, sizes, and locations; 4.Landscape protection plans; 5.Location and photographs of the property and adjacent properties; 6.Elevation drawings of the proposed changes, if available; 7.Samples of materials to be used; 8.Specifications for architectural features and materials; and 9.Any other information that the Landmark Commission or Historic Preservation Officer may deem necessary in order to visualize proposed work. C. Certificate of Appropriateness Approval Process Certificate of Appropriateness applications shall be processed in accordance with the following requirements: 1.Preapplication Conference Prior to the submission of an application for Certificate of Appropriateness, all potential applicants may request a preapplication conference with the Administrator. The purpose of the preapplication conference is to respond to any questions that the applicant may have regarding any application procedures, standards, or regulations required by this UDO; however, the preapplication conference does not fulfill the requirements for formal review or submittal as set forth in this UDO. 2.Review and Report by the Historic Preservation Officer Upon receipt of an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness, the Historic Preservation Officer shall determine whether the application is to be reviewed under the Standard Certificate of Appropriateness Review Procedure or the Routine Maintenance Work Procedure. If the application is to be reviewed under the Standard Certificate of Appropriateness Review Procedure, the following applies. If the application is to be reviewed under the Routine Maintenance Work Procedure, the procedure in subsection E. below will apply.  Article 3. Development Review Procedures Section 3.9 Certificate of Appropriateness 3.Under the Standard Certificate of Appropriateness Review Procedure, the Historic Preservation Officer will review the application to determine if the proposed plan is consistent with all applicable provisions of this UDO and the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The Historic Preservation Officer will forward his report on the application to the Landmark Commission with a recommendation for approval, denial or conditional approval. 4.Review by the Landmark Commission The Landmark Commission shall review the application in a public meeting and may approve, approve with conditions or deny the application. If the Landmark Commission requires additional information than that presented at a meeting, a decision may be postponed until a specified date when the specified information may be provided. Notice shall be provided by publication of the agenda of the meeting. 5.Final Action by the Landmark Commission If the application is determined to be consistent with all applicable provisions of this UDO, including the applicable district provisions of Section 5.10 Historic Preservation Overlay District and the review criteria below, the Landmark Commission shall approve the plan. A determination that all requirements and provisions have not been satisfied shall result in disapproval of the plan. D. Criteria for Approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness The Landmark Commission shall approve a Certificate of Appropriateness if it finds: 1.For Contributing Resources: a. The proposed work is consistent with The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation,The Secretary of the Interior’s Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings,Preservation Briefs, and all related interpretative documents published by the US Department of Interior; b. The proposed work will not have an adverse effect on the architectural features of the structure; c. The proposed work will not have an adverse effect on the Historic Preservation Overlay district; and d. The proposed work will not have an adverse effect on the future preservation, maintenance, and use of the structure or the Historic Preservation Overlay District. 2.For Non-Contributing Resources: the proposed work is compatible with the Historic Preservation Overlay District. E. Certificate of Appropriateness Routine Maintenance Work Review Procedure 1.If, upon review of an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness, the Historic Preservation Officer determines that an applicant is seeking a Certificate of Appropriateness to authorize only routine maintenance work, the Historic Preservation Officer shall review the Certificate of Appropriateness application to determine whether the proposed work complies with the regulations contained in this Section and approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application. The Historic Preservation Officer may also forward the application to the Landmark Commission for any reason. 2. Routine Maintenance Work on a property is considered to be: a.The installation of a chimney located on an accessory building, or on the rear fifty percent (50%) of a main building and not part of a corner side façade; b. The installation of an awning located on an accessory building, or on the rear façade of a primary structure; c. The installation of a wood or chain link fence that is not painted or stained; e. The installation of gutters and downspouts of a color that matches or compliments the dominant trim or roof color;  Article 3. Development Review Procedures Section 3.9 Certificate of Appropriateness f. The installation of skylights and solar panels; g. The installation of storm windows and doors; j. The restoration of original architectural elements; 3.The applicant may appeal the Historic Preservation Officer’s decision by submitting to the Historic Preservation Officer a written request for appeal within ten (10) calendar days of the decision. Upon the written request for appeal, the Landmark Commission will review the application under the Standard Certificate of Appropriateness Review Procedure. F. Expiration of Approval 1.For plans that do not require the issuance of a building permit, work to complete the plans shall commence and be completed within twenty-four (24) months from the date of approval of the application. The Historic Preservation Officer may authorize a single extension of a Certification of Appropriateness up to six (6) months upon demonstration of substantial progress and the lack of changed or changing conditions in the area. 2.For plans that require the issuance of a building permit, if a building permit has not been issued for the proposed work within twenty-four (24) months from the date of approval of the application, the Historic Preservation Officer may authorize a single extension of a Certification of Appropriateness up to six (6) months upon demonstration of the lack of changed or changing conditions in the area. A Certification of Appropriateness shall be valid as long as there is a valid building permit. G. Appeals An applicant for a Certification of Appropriateness dissatisfied with the action of the Landmark Commission related to the issuance or denial of a Certification of Appropriateness shall have the right to appeal to the City Council within ten (10) calendar days after the date of such action. In considering an appeal, the City Council shall consider the same standards and evidence that the Landmark Commission was required to consider in making the decision. H. Limitation on Reapplication If a final decision is reached denying a Certificate of Appropriateness, no further applications may be considered for the subject matter of the denied Certificate of Appropriateness for one (1) year from the date of the final decision unlessthe Landmark Commission waives the time limitation because the Landmark Commission finds that there are changed circumstances sufficient to warrant a new hearing. I.Revocation The Historic Preservation Officer may, in writing, revoke a Certificate of Appropriateness if: 1.The Certificate of Appropriateness was issued on the basis of incorrect information supplied by the applicant, or 2.The work is not performed in accordance with the Certificate of Appropriateness. J.Amendment to a Certificate of Appropriateness A Certificate of Appropriateness may be amended by submitting a new Certificate of Appropriateness application to the Historic Preservation Officer. The application shall then be subject to either the Standard Certificate of Appropriateness Review Procedure or the Routine Maintenance Work Procedure. K.Ordinary Maintenance Other than the Routine Maintenance Work listed above, a Certificate of Appropriateness shall not be required for the ordinary maintenance and repair of any exterior architectural feature of a property within a Historic Preservation Overlay District which does not involve a change in design, material, or outward appearance such as:  Article 3. Development Review Procedures Section 3.9 Certificate of Appropriateness 1. The replacement of a roof of the same or an original material that does not include a change in color; 2. The application of paint that is the same as the existing; 3. Minor repair using the same material and design as the original; 4. The repair of sidewalks and driveways using the same type and color of materials; 5. The process of cleaning (including but not limited to low-pressure water blasting and stripping, but excluding sandblasting and high-pressure water blasting); and 6.The painting, replacing, duplicating, or stabilizing deteriorated or damaged non-original architectural features (including but not limited to roofing, windows, columns, and siding) in order to maintain the structure and to slow deterioration. F. Temporary Emergency Repairs If the Building Official determines that a building or structure in a Historic Preservation Overlay District poses an immediate threat to persons or property, the Building Official may take any action authorized under the CCSCO to make the ITY OF OLLEGE TATION ODE OF RDINANCES building or structure safe without the requirement of a Certification of Appropriateness. The Building Official shall send a written report of such actions to the Landmark Commission.  Article 3. Development Review Procedures Section 3.10 Certificate of Demolition 3.10 Certificate of Demolition A.Applicability 1. Prior to any demolition or removal of any structure or portion Application thereof on any property within a Historic Preservation Overlay Submittal District, an applicant must obtain a Certificate of Demolition in accordance with this Section. Staff Review 2. No building permit shall be issued for proposed work within a Historic Preservation Overlay District until a Certificate of Completeness Review Demolition required by the UDO has first been issued by the Landmark Commission. The Certificate of Demolition shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, any building permit that may be Economic Review required by any other ordinance of the City of College Station. Formatted: Font: 6 pt Panel (when necessary) 3. No permit for the demolition of a structure or property within a Formatted: Centered Historic Preservation Overlay District, including secondary buildings Formatted: Font: 6 pt and landscape features, shall be granted by the Building Official without the review of a completed application for and approval of a Formatted: Font: 8 pt Certificate of Demolition by the Landmark Commission. Landmark B.Application Requirements Commission A property owner seeking demolition or removal of a structure, including secondary buildings and landscape features, on a property in a Historic Preservation Overlay District shall submit a complete application for a Certificate of Demolition to the Administrator as set forth in Section 3.1.C., Application Forms and Fees. The application shall include: 1. An affidavit in which the owner swears or affirms that all information submitted in the application is true and correct. 2. An indication that the demolition or removal is sought for one or more of the following reasons: a. To replace the structure with a new structure that is more appropriate and compatible with the Historic Preservation Overlay District; b. No economically viable use of the property exists; c.The structure poses an imminent threat to public health or safety; or d. The structure is noncontributing to the Historic Preservation Overlay District because it is newer than the period of historic significance. 3. An application “To replace the structure with a new structure that is more appropriate and compatible with the Historic Preservation Overlay District” shall also include: a. Records depicting the original construction of the structure, including drawings, pictures, or written descriptions where available; b. Records depicting the current condition of the structure, including drawings, pictures, or written descriptions; c. Any conditions proposed to be placed voluntarily on the new structure that would mitigate the loss of the structure; d. Complete architectural drawings of the new structure; and e. A guarantee agreement between the owner and the City that demonstrates the owner’s intent and financial ability to construct the new structure. The guarantee must: 1) Contain a statement of intent to construct the proposed structure by a specific date in accordance with architectural drawings approved by the City through the Certificate of Appropriateness process; 2) Require the owner or construction contractor to post a performance and payment bond, letter of credit, escrow agreement, cash deposit, or other arrangement acceptable to the Administrator to ensure construction of the new structure; and 3) Be approved as to form by the City Attorney.  Article 3. Development Review Procedures Section 3.10 Certificate of Demolition 4. An application that “No economically viable use of the property exists” shall also include: a. The past and current uses of the structure and property; b. The name of the owner. 1)If the owner is a legal entity, the type of entity and states in which it is registered. 2) The date and price of purchase or other acquisition of the structure and property, and the party from whom acquired, and the owner’s current basis in the property. 3)The relationship, if any, between the owner and the party from whom the structure and property were acquired. (If one or both parties to the transaction were legal entities, any relationships between the officers and the board of directors of the entities must be specified.); 4)The assessed value of the structure and property according to the two most recent tax assessments; 5) The amount of real estate taxes on the structure and property for the previous two (2) years; 6) The current fair market value of the structure and property as determined by an independent licensed appraiser; 7) All appraisals obtained by the owner and prospective purchasers within the previous two (2) years in connection with the potential or actual purchase, financing, or ownership of the structure and property; 8) All listings of the structure and property for sale or rent within the previous two (2) years, prices asked, and offers received; 9) A profit and loss statement for the property and structure containing the annual gross income for the previous two (2) years; itemized expenses (including operating and maintenance costs) for the previous two (2) years, including proof that adequate and competent management procedures were followed; the annual cash flow for the previous two (2) years; and proof that the owner has made reasonable efforts to obtain a reasonable rate of return on the owner's investment and labor; 10) A mortgage history of the property during the previous five (5) years, including the principal balances and interest rates on the mortgages and the annual debt services on the structure and property; 11) All capital expenditures during the current ownership; 12) Records depicting the current conditions of the structure and property, including drawings, pictures, or written descriptions; 13) A study of restoration of the structure or property, performed by a licensed architect, engineer or financial analyst, analyzing the physical feasibility (including architectural and engineering analyses) and financial feasibility (including pro forma profit and loss statements for a ten (10) year period, taking into consideration redevelopment options and all incentives available) of adaptive use of restoration of the structure and property; 14) Any consideration given by the owner to profitable adaptive uses for the structure and property; 15) Construction plans for any proposed development or adaptive reuse, including site plans, floor plans, and elevations; 16) Any conditions proposed to be placed voluntarily on new development that would mitigate the loss of the structure; and 17) Any other evidence that shows that the affirmative obligation to maintain the structure or property makes it impossible to realize a reasonable rate of return. 5. An application to demolish or remove a structure that “Poses an imminent threat to public health or safety” shall also include: a. Records depicting the current condition of the structure, including drawings, pictures, or written descriptions; b. A study regarding the nature, imminence, and severity of the threat, as performed by a licensed architect or engineer; and c.A study regarding both the cost of restoration of the structure and the feasibility (including architectural and engineering analyses) of restoration of the structure, as performed by a licensed architect or engineer.  Article 3. Development Review Procedures Section 3.10 Certificate of Demolition 6. An application to demolish or remove a structure that is “Noncontributing to the Historic Preservation Overlay District because the structure is newer than the period of historic significance” shall also provide: a. Documentation that the structure is noncontributing to the Historic Preservation Overlay District; b. Documentation of the age of the structure; and c.A statement of the purpose of the demolition. 7. Any other evidence the property owner wishes to submit in support of the application. 8. Any other evidence requested by the Landmark Commission or the Historic Preservation Officer. C. Certificate of Demolition Approval Process Certificate of Demolition applications shall be processed in accordance with the following requirements: 1.Preapplication Conference Prior to the submission of an application for Certificate of Demolition, all potential applicants may request a preapplication conference with the Administrator. The purpose of the preapplication conference is to respond to any questions that the applicant may have regarding any application procedures, standards, or regulations required by this UDO; however, the preapplication conference does not fulfill the requirements for formal review or submittal as set forth in this UDO. 2.Application When a complete application for a Certificate of Demolition has been submitted to the City, the application will begin a mandatory sixty (60) day stay of demolition. The Certificate of Demolition approval process will continue concurrently with the stay of demolition, but the Landmark Commission shall not take final action before the stay of demolition has expired. 3.Review and Report by the Historic Preservation Officer If the application is determined to be consistent with all applicable provisions of this UDO and the City’s Comprehensive Plan, or if the application is recommended for denial or conditional approval, the Historic Preservation Officer shall report such consistency, inconsistency, or proposed conditions to the Landmark Commission. 4.Review by an Economic Review Panel For an application that “No economically viable use of the property exists”, within thirty- five (35) days after appointment of the Economic Review Panel as provided in Section 2.4, the Economic Review Panel shall review the submitted documentation; hold a public hearing; consider all options for renovation, adaptive reuse, and redevelopment; and forward a written recommendation to the Landmark Commission. The Historic Preservation Officer shall provide administrative support to the Economic Review Panel. The Economic Review Panel’s recommendation shall be based on the same standard for approval to be used by the Landmark Commission. An application that no economically viable use of the property exists will not be considered complete until the Economic Review Panel has made its recommendation to the Landmark Commission. If the Economic Review Panel is unable to reach a consensus, the report will indicate the majority and minority recommendations. If the Economic Review Panel does not meet within thirty-five (35) days after appointment, a recommendation of no economically viable use of the property will be forwarded to the Landmark Commission. 5.Review by the Landmark Commission The Landmark Commission shall review the application for Certificate of Demolition in a public meeting and may approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application. If the Landmark Commission requires additional information than that presented at a meeting, a decision may be postponed until a specified date when the specified information may be provided. Notice shall be provided by publication of the agenda of the meeting.  Article 3. Development Review Procedures Section 3.10 Certificate of Demolition 6.Final Action by the Landmark Commission If the application is determined to be consistent with all applicable provisions of this UDO, including the applicable district provisions of Section 5.10 Historic Preservation Overlay District, and the review criteria below, the Landmark Commission shall approve the plan. A determination that all such requirements and provision have not been satisfied shall result in disapproval of the plan. The property owner has the burden of proof to establish by clear and convincing evidence the necessary facts to warrant favorable action by the Landmark Commission. D. Criteria for Approval of a Certificate of Demolition In considering an application for a Certificate of Demolition, the Landmark Commission shall deny the application unless it makes the following findings: 1. The Landmark Commission shall deny an application for a Certificate of Demolition to replace a structure with a new structure unless it finds that: a. The new structure is more appropriate and compatible with the Historic Preservation Overlay District than the structure to be demolished or removed; and b. The owner has the financial ability and intent to build the new structure. The Landmark Commission must first approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the proposed new structure and the guarantee agreement to construct the new structure before it may consider the application for a Certificate of Demolition. 2. The Landmark Commission shall deny an application for a Certificate of Demolition to remove a structure because of no economically viable use of the property unless it finds that: a. The structure is incapable of earning a reasonable economic return unless the demolition or removal is allowed (a reasonable economic return does not have to be the most profitable return possible); b. The structure cannot be adapted for any other use, whether by the owner or by a purchaser, which would result in a reasonable economic return; and c.The owner has failed during the last two (2) years to find a developer, financier, purchaser, or tenant that would enable the owner to realize a reasonable economic return, despite having made substantial ongoing efforts to do so. 3. The Landmark Commission shall deny an application for a Certificate of Demolition to remove a structure that poses an imminent threat to public health or safety unless it finds that: a. The structure constitutes a documented major and imminent threat to public health and safety; b. The demolition or removal is required to alleviate the threat to public health and safety; and c.There is no reasonable way, other than demolition or removal, to eliminate the threat in a timely manner. 4. The Landmark Commission shall deny an application for a Certificate of Demolition to remove a structure that is noncontributing to the Historic Preservation Overlay District because it is newer than the period of historic significance unless it finds that: a. The structure is noncontributing to the Historic Preservation Overlay District; b. The structure is newer than the period of historic significance for the Historic Preservation Overlay District; and c.Demolition of the structure will not adversely affect the historic character of the property or the integrity of the Historic Preservation Overlay District. E.Appeals 1. Any interested person may appeal the decision of the Landmark Commission to the City Council by filing a written notice with the Administrator within ten (10) calendar days after the decision of the Landmark Commission. If no appeal is made of a decision to approve a Certificate of Demolition within the 10-day period, the Building Official shall issue the permit to allow demolition or removal. If an appeal is filed, the City Council shall hear and decide the appeal within sixty-five (65) calendars days of its filing. 2. In considering an appeal, the City Council shall consider the same standards and evidence that the Landmark Commission was required to consider in making the decision.  Article 3. Development Review Procedures Section 3.10 Certificate of Demolition F.Limitation on Reapplication If a final decision is reached denying a Certificate of Demolition, no further applications may be considered for the subject matter of the denied Certificate of Demolition for one (1) year from the date of the final decision unless the Landmark Commission waives the time limitation because the Landmark Commission finds that there are changed circumstances sufficient to warrant a new hearing. G.Expiration of Approval A Certificate of Demolition expires if the work authorized by the Certificate of Demolition is not commenced within 180 days from the date of final approval. A final, one-time extension for the commencement of work of 90 days may be granted by the Administrator upon written request by the applicant showing circumstances beyond the control of the applicant. If the Certificate of Demolition expires, a new Certificate of Demolition must first be obtained before the work can commence. H.Demolition by Neglect 1. Prohibition No owner or person with an interest in real property included within a Historic Preservation Overlay District shall permit the property to fall into a serious state of disrepair so as to result in the deterioration of any exterior architectural feature or structural compromise which would, in the judgment of the Landmark Commission, produce a detrimental effect upon the character of the Historic Preservation Overlay District as a whole or the life and character of the property itself. Examples of such deterioration include, but are not limited to: Deterioration of the foundation. Deterioration of floor supports or the addition of floor supports that are insufficient to carry the loads imposed. Deterioration of walls, windows, doors, or other vertical supports, or the addition of such supports that are of insufficient size or strength to carry the loads imposed. Deterioration of roof or other horizontal members. Deterioration of exterior chimneys. Deterioration or crumbling of exterior stucco or mortar. Ineffective waterproofing of exterior walls, roof, or foundations, including broken windows or doors. Defective weather protection or lack of weather protection for exterior wall coverings, including lack of paint or other protective coating. Any fault, defect, or condition in the structure that renders it structurally unsafe or not properly watertight. Deterioration of any feature so as to create a hazardous condition which could lead to the claim that demolition is necessary for the public safety. 2.Procedure a. Purpose The purpose of the Demolition by Neglect procedure is to allow the Landmark Commission to work with the property owner to encourage maintenance and stabilization of the structure and identify resources available before any enforcement action is taken. b. Request for investigation Any interested party may request that the Historic Preservation Officer investigate whether a property is being Demolished by Neglect. c. First meeting with the property owner Upon receipt of a request, the Historic Preservation Officer and City Building Official shall meet with the property owner or the property owner’s agent with control of the structure to inspect the structure and discuss the resources available for financing any necessary repairs. After the meeting, the Historic Preservation Officer shall prepare a report for the Landmark Commission on the condition of the structure, the repairs needed to maintain and stabilize the structure, any resources available for financing the repairs, and the amount of time needed to complete the repairs. d. Certification and notice After review of the report in a public meeting, the Landmark Commission may vote to certify the property as a Demolition by Neglect case. If the Landmark  Article 3. Development Review Procedures Section 3.10 Certificate of Demolition Commission certifies the structure as a Demolition by Neglect case, the Landmark Commission shall notify the property owner or the property owner’s agent with control over the structure of the repairs that must be made. The notice must require that repairs be started within thirty (30) days and set a deadline for completion of the repairs. The notice shall be sent by certified mail. e. Second meeting with the property owner The Historic Preservation Officer and the City Building Official shall meet with the property owner or the property owner’s agent with control over the structure at least within sixty (60) days after the notice was sent to inspect any repairs. f. Referral for enforcement If the property owner or the property owner’s agent with control over the structure fails to start repairs by the deadline set in the notice, fails to make continuous progress toward completion, or fails to complete repairs by the deadline set in the notice, the Landmark Commission may refer the Demolition by Neglect case to the City’s Code Enforcement Division for appropriate enforcement action to prevent Demolition by Neglect. I. Demolition by Condemnation Reasonable attempts to engage a property owner in a Demolition by Neglect procedure shall be made when there is concern for the deterioration of a structure, but when a structure or equipment is found by the City Building Official to be a dangerous structure, the provisions of the City of College Station Code of Ordinances regulating dangerous structures will apply. J. Historic Preservation Fund 1. The City of College Station, in cooperation with community organizations, shall develop appropriate funding structures and shall administer the historic preservation fund. 2. The historic preservation fund is composed of the following funds: a. Outside funding (other than City general funds or capital funds), such as grants and donations, made to the City for the purpose of historic preservation and funding partnerships with community organizations. b. Damages recovered pursuant to TLGCS315.006from EXAS OCAL OVERNMENT ODE ECTION persons who illegally demolish or adversely affect historic structures. 3. The outside funding may be used for financing the following activities: a. Necessary repairs in Demolition by Neglect cases; b. Full or partial restoration of low-income residential and nonresidential structures; c.Full or partial restoration of publicly owned historic structures; d. Acquisition of historic structures, places, or areas through gift or purchase; e. Public education of the benefits of historic preservation or the regulations governing Historic Preservation Overlay Districts; and f.Identification and cataloging of structures, places, areas, and districts of historical, cultural, or architectural value along with factual verification of their significance. 4. Damages recovered pursuant to Texas Local Government Code Section 315.006 must be used only for the following purposes: a. Construction, using as many of the original materials as possible, of a structure that is a reasonable facsimile of a demolished historic structure; b. Restoration, using as many of the original materials as possible, of the historic structure; and c. Restoration of another historic structure.  Article 3. Development Review Procedures Section 3.11 Building Permit 3.11 Building Permit A.Building Permit Required Application Submittal No building or other structure shall hereafter be erected, moved, added to, structurally altered, repaired, demolished, or occupancy Staff changed without a permit issued by the Building Official except in Review conformity with the provisions of this section and the 2006 Completeness IBC as adopted and amended by the City, NTERNATIONAL UILDING ODE Review unless otherwise provided for in the C CSC ITY OF OLLEGE TATION ODE OF O. No Building Permit issued under the provisions of this RDINANCES Article for land use or construction in the City shall be considered valid unless signed by the Building Official. Building Official  Article 4. Zoning Districts Section 4.1 Establishment of Districts 4.1Establishment of Districts For the purpose of this UDO, portions of the City, as specified on the Official Zoning Map of the City, are hereby divided into the zoning, design, and overlay districts enumerated below. The intensity regulations applicable for such zoning districts are designated in Article 5 and the use regulations are designated in Article 6 of this UDO. Residential Zoning Districts A-O Agricultural-Open A-OR Rural Residential Subdivision R-1 Single-Family Residential R-1B Single-Family Residential R-2 Duplex Residential R-3 Townhouse R-4 Multi-Family R-6 High Density Multi-Family R-7 Manufactured Home Park Non-Residential Zoning Districts A-P Administrative / Professional C-1 General Commercial C-2 Commercial-Industrial C-3 Light Commercial M-1 Light Industrial M-2 Heavy Industrial C-U College and University R & D Research & Development Planned Districts P-MUD Planned Mixed-Use District PDD Planned Development District Design Districts WPC Wolf Pen Creek Development Corridor NG-1 Core Northgate NG-2 Transitional Northgate Northgate NG-3 Residential Northgate Overlay Districts OV Corridor Overlay RDD Redevelopment District KO Krenek Tap Overlay NPO Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay NCO Neighborhood Conservation Overlay HP Historic Preservation Overlay Per Ordinance No. 2881 (March 23, 2006) 4-1 Unified Development Ordinance 6/25/07 City of College Station, Texas  Article 5. District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards 5.9 Single-Family Overlay Districts 5.10Historic Preservation Overlay District A.Purpose The Historic Preservation Overlay District is intended to provide for the protection and preservation of places and areas of historical, cultural, and architectural importance and significance. Such action is necessary to promote the economic, cultural, educational, and general welfare of the public. Specifically, this district has the following expressed purposes: 1.To protect and enhance the landmarks and districts which represent distinctive elements of College Station’s historic, architectural, and cultural heritage; 2.To foster civic pride in the accomplishments of the past; 3.To protect and enhance College Station’s attractiveness to visitors and the support and stimulus to the economy thereby provided; 4.To insure the harmonious, orderly, and efficient growth and development of the City; 5.To promote economic prosperity and welfare of the community by encouraging the most appropriate use of such property within the City; and 6.To encourage stabilization, restoration, and improvements of such properties and their values. B.Applicability The Historic Preservation Overlay District may be applied to districts, areas, or individual property, regardless of the base zoning district or current use of the property(ies), that: 1. Are at least forty (40) years old; 2. Meet at least one of the criteria listed below; and 3. Possess integrity that is evident through historic qualities including Location, Design, Setting, Materials, Workmanship, Feeling, and Association. C.Criteria for Designation of Historic Preservation Overlay Districts A property or district may be designated if it: 1.Possesses significance in history, architecture, archeology, and culture; 2.Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local, regional, state, or national history; 3.Is associated with events that have made a significant impact in our past; 4.Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; 5.Represents the work of a master designer, builder, or craftsman; 6.Represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood or city; or 7.Is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, Recorded Texas Historic Landmark, or a State Archaeological Landmark, as determined by the Texas Historical Commission. D.Removal of a Historic Preservation Overlay District Upon recommendation of the Landmark Commission to the Planning and Zoning Commission based upon new and compelling evidence and negative evaluation according to the same criteria and following the same procedures set forth in this UDO for designation, the Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend to the City Council and the City Council may remove an Historic Preservation Overlay District made under this section.   Unified Development Ordinance City of College Station, Texas     Article 10. Enforcement Section 10.5 Specific Penalties for Certificates of Appropriateness and Certificates of Demolition Article 10.Enforcement 10.5Specific Penalties for Certificates of Appropriateness and Certificates of Demolition A.A person is criminally responsible for a violation of Sections 3.9 Certificate of Appropriateness and 3.10 Certificate of Demolition if: 1.The person owns part or all of the property where the violation occurs, 2.The person is the agent of the owner of the property and is in control of the property, or 3. The person commits the violation or assists in the commission of the violation. B.Any person who adversely affects or demolishes a structure on property in a historic overlay district in violation of Sections 3.9 Certificate of Appropriateness and 3.10 Certificate of Demolition is liable pursuant to TLGCS EXASOCALOVERNMENT ODEECTION 315.006 for damages to restore or replicate, using as many of the original materials as possible, the structure to its appearance and setting prior to the violation. No Certificates of Appropriateness or building permits will be issued for construction on the site except to restore or replicate the structure. When these restrictions become applicable to a site, the Administrator shall cause to be filed a verified notice in the county deed records and these restrictions shall be binding on future owners of the property. These restrictions are in addition to any fines imposed. C.Prosecution in municipal court for an offense under this Section does not prevent the use of other enforcement remedies or procedures provided by other City ordinances or state of federal laws applicable to the person(s) charged with or the conduct involved in the offense. 10-1  Unified Development Ordinance 12/24/07 City of College Station, Texas Article 11. Definitions Section 11.2 Defined Terms Article 11. Definitions 11.2 Defined Terms Historic Preservation Easement: An easement that protects a significant historic, archaeological, or cultural resource. It provides assurance that a property’s intrinsic values will be preserved through future ownership. A building, portion of a building (such as the façade), or a bridge, dam, or any other kind of structure may qualify. A Historic Preservation Easement may also protect a historic landscape, battlefield, traditional cultural place, or archaeological site. Historic Preservation Overlay District definitions (applicable only in reference to Historic Preservation Overlay district): Association: Link of a property that contributes to a Historic Preservation Overlay District with a historic event, activity, or person. Also, the quality of integrity through which a property is linked to a particular past time and place. Contributing Resource: A building, site, structure or object in a Historic Preservation Overlay District that supports the District’s historical significance through Location, Design, Setting, Materials, Workmanship, Feeling, or Association. Design: Quality of integrity applying to the elements that create the physical form, plan, space, structure, and style of a property. Feeling:Quality of integrity through which a property that contributes to a Historic Preservation Overlay District evokes the aesthetic or historic sense of past time and place. Integrity: Authenticity of a property’s historic identity, evidenced by the survival of physical characteristics that existed during the property’s historic or prehistoric period. Location: Quality of integrity retained by a property that contributes to a Historic Preservation Overlay District historic property existing in the same place as it did during the period of significance. Materials:Quality of integrity applying to the physical elements that were combined or deposited in a particular pattern or configuration to form a property that contributes to a Historic Preservation Overlay District. Non-Contributing Resource: A building, site, structure, or object in a Historic Preservation Overlay District that does not support the District’s historical significance through Location, Design, Setting, Materials, Workmanship, Feeling, or Association. Setting: Quality of integrity applying to the physical environment of a property that contributes to a Historic Preservation Overlay District. Workmanship: Quality of integrity applying to the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture, people, or artisan.