Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/11/2010 - Regular Agenda Packet - Design Review BoardCITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home of Texas AeTM University' Design Review Board June 11, 2010 11:00 A.M. City Hall Administrative Conference Room 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas AGENDA DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Friday, June 11, 20100, 11:00 AM Administrative Conference Room College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas, 77840 1. Call to Order 2. Consideration, discussion and possible action on absence requests. 3. Consideration, discussion and possible action to approve meeting minutes. • March 9th, 2010 4. Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a sign package for Tutta Pasta at The Lofts at Wolf Pen Creek, located at 614 Holleman Drive East, in the Wolf Pen Creek District. Case #10-00500102 (LH) 4. Presentation, possible action, and discussion on waivers to the requirement for sidewalk width, street trees, and street benches in the Northgate zoning district for Aquarium Bar, located at 209 University Drive. Case #08-00500162 (LH) 5. Possible action and discussion on future agenda items - A Design Review Board Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 6. Adjourn. Notice is hereby given that a Regular Meeting of the Design Review Board of the City of College Station, Texas will be held on the Friday, June 11, 2010 at 11:00 a.m. at the City Hall Administrative Conference Room, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas. The following subjects will be discussed, to wit: See Agenda Posted this the day of . 2010 at p.m. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS Connie Hooks, City Secretary I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the above Notice of Meeting of the Design Review Board of the City of College Station, Texas, is a true and correct copy of said Notice and that I posted a true and correct copy of said notice on the bulletin board at City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, in College Station, Texas, and the City's website, ww3y.cs12S.aov. The Agenda and Notice are readily accessible to the general public at all times. Said Notice and Agenda were posted on , 2010 and remained so posted continuously for at least 72 hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting. This public notice was removed from the official posting board at the College Station City Hall on the following date and time: by Dated this day of , 2010. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS Subscribed and sworn to before me on this the day of . 2010. Notary Public- Brazos County, Texas My commission expires: This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3517 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. Agendas may be viewed on &ww.cstx.aov. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning 6- Development Services Minutes Design Review Board In Joint Session with the Wolf Pen Creek Oversight Committee Tuesday, March 09, 2010, 1:30 PM Training Room Carter Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant 2200 North Forest Parkway College Station, Texas, 77840 Board Members Present: Acting Chairman Ward Wells, Jason Kinnard, Alan King, and Katy Jackson Board Members Absent: John Nichols and Hunter Goodwin Staff Present: Assistant Director Lance Simms and Senior Planner Jason Schubert AGENDA ITEM NO. 1: Call to order. Acting Chairman Ward Wells called the meeting to order at 1:52 p.m. AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the concept drawings for the Wolf Pen Creek water feature and festival area in joint session with the Wolf Pen Creek Oversight Committee Donald Harmon, Assistant Director of Capital Projects presented an overview of the proposed Wolf Pen Creek water feature and festival area project. There was general discussion regarding the overall project layout and the estimated timeframe for project completion. AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the Code Coordination Sub-Committee and appointment of membership to the same. (LS) Lance Simms, Assistant Director of Planning & Development Services, informed the Board members that Chairman Nichols appointed Jason Kinnard to serve as the DRB representative on the recently created Code Coordination Subcommittee. AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Possible action and discussion on future agenda items - A Design Review Board Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. None AGENDA ITEM NO. 5: Adjourn The meeting was adjourned at 2:42 pm APPROVED: Ward Wells, Acting Chairman ATTEST: Mandi Alford, Staff Assistant CITY OP COId,F?GFs STATION Home of Texas A&M University" DESIGN REVIEW BOARD for Tutta Pasta (10-00500102) REQUEST: Attached Sign LOCATION: 614 Holleman Dr E Suite 1100 ZONING DISTRICT: WPC Wolf Pen Creek District APPLICANT: Joseph Labarbera, Tutta Pasta PROJECT MANAGER: Lauren Hovde, Staff Planner Ihovde@cstx.gov RECOMMENDATION: Approval Design Review Board Page 1 of 3 June 11, 2010 CITY OF COLLEGE. STATION Hvmr of Texas A6'M University' FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.: DATE SUBMITTED: STAFF: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION WOLF PEN CREEK DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (Check all that apply. Note: All items checked must be presented to the Design Review Board at the same time): ❑ Site Plan / Building ❑ Building Sign MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: $250 Design Review Board Application Fee. Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided. For Site Plan / Building consideration: ❑ $668 Site Plan Application Fee. ❑ $600 (minimum) Development Permit Application / Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is 0.75% of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is > $600, the balance is due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit). ❑ $250 Non-Residential Architectural Standards Building Review Application Fee (if applicable). ❑ Fourteen (14) folded copies of site plan. ❑ One (1) folded copy of the landscape plan. ❑ One (1) copy of the following for building review (if applicable). ❑ Building elevations for all buildings. ❑ A list of building materials for all facade and screening. ❑ Color samples for all buildings or list colors to be used from the approved color palette. ❑ Two (2) copies of the grading, drainage, and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report. ❑ Two (2) copies of the public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable). ❑ Notice of Intent (NOI) if disturbed area is greater than five (5) acres cumulatively. ❑ The attached Site Plan and Non-Residential Architectural Standards Building Review checklists (if applicable) with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not check off. For Building consideration: ❑ $250 Non-Residential Architectural Standards Building Review Application Fee (if applicable). ❑ One (1) copy of building elevations for all buildings. ❑ A list of building materials for all facades'and screening. ❑ Color samples for all buildings or list colors to be used from the approved color palette. ❑ The attached Non-Residential Architectural Standards Building Review checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not checked off (if applicable). F Sign consideration: Ten (10) copies of sign details with dimensions. Ten (10) copies of the building elevation showing sign placement (if attached signage is proposed). Ten (10) copies of color samples. Material samples. NOTE: Proposed development in Wolf Pen Creek must be reviewed by the Design Review Board. When staff has completed their technical review of the proposal, it will be scheduled for consideration by the Design Review Board. Ten (10) copies of all current design plans and color samples will be required for the Board. 1/10 Page 1 of 11 Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference NAME OF PROJECT T:N1 "I~h~ mo~6~c.~r ADDRESS'_ V 'k...1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision) APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name __oSepl,, S. Lo.o.r~~v-o E-mail Street Address a O 14 C L~i 11 City m n nAwal,, State Zip Code Phone Number Sl a - 'A etc - c+,%Ic~ Fax Number PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name GsS Q plus E-mail Street Address S to c5.vq ~Q 1 DQ Sd~ oS o City Lc aSz6y State _r X, Zip Code Phone Number (l t 31 a S2 - 59c, o Fax Number Proposed use of property Res ~a v r ah L "P+ lapar I rv`a1}~ Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? ❑ Yes ❑ No Square footage of attached sign Square footage of freestanding sign For Site Plan consideration, describe how the following proposed elements meet the goals of the special district plan and related regulations: Site Lighting: Solid Waste: Relationship of building(s) to site: Building footprint design: Miscellaneous structures and street hardware: Landscaping: Site Maintenance: 1110 Page 3 of 11 Maintenance: The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. pwft n 19 Date Page 4 of 1 t Design Review Board Page 2 of 3 June 11, 2010 ITEM SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to add a reverse-lit channel letter attached sign that incorporates three colors including black and deep red letters with an olive green leaf graphic over the name. The deep red closely resembles the approved Honeybaked Ham sign. The proposed attached sign is approximately 41 square feet in size, which is less than the 66 square feet allowed. As such, the proposed sign is meeting the technical requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance, Section 7.4.1 Attached Signs as it relates to allowable size and placement. The recently approved Honeybaked Ham sign is also 41 square feet in area. ITEM BACKGROUND: Tutta Pasta is proposing to add an attached sign to their commercial tenant space at The Lofts at Wolf Pen Creek. All signs in the Wolf Pen Creek District must be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board prior to receiving a sign permit from the Planning & Development Services Department. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed attached sign described above, as it is in Staffs opinion that the colors and materials proposed are restrained and harmonious with the existing building and signage and the number of graphical elements are being held to a minimum. In addition, the proposed sign meets all technical requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance Section 7.4.1 Attached Signs. ITEMS FOR REVIEW: 1. Signage - The UDO provides the Design Review Board with the following guidance when considering signs in the Wolf Pen Creek District: Section 5.6.A.11 Signs a. Every sign shall be designed as an integral architectural element of the building and site to which it principally relates. b. Every sign shall have good scale and proportion in its design and in its visual relationship to buildings and surroundings. c. The colors, materials, and lighting of every sign shall be restrained and harmonious with the building and site to which it principally relates. d. The number of graphic elements on a sign shall be held to the minimum needed to convey the sign's major message and shall be composed in proportion to the area of the sign face. e. Each sign shall be compatible with signs on adjoining premises and shall not compete for attention. Design Review Board Page 3 of 3 June 11, 2010 f. Identification signs of a prototype design and corporation logos shall conform to the criteria for all other signs. SUPPORTING MATERIALS: 1. Application 2. Sign details (provided in packet) 3. Color Sample (provided at meeting) Design Review Board Page 4 of 3 June 11, 2010 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD for Aquarium Bar (08-00500162) REQUEST: Waiver to Northgate District standards regarding sidewalk widths, street trees, and street benches LOCATION: Aquarium Bar, located at 209 University Drive ZONING DISTRICT: NG-1, Core Northgate APPLICANT: Bill Scarmardo PROJECT MANAGER: Lauren Hovde, Staff Planner Ihovde@cstx.gov RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the sidewalk width and street tree waiver request based on the existing constraints of the site and the future TxDOT widening project along University Drive. Staff recommends denial of the street bench waiver request as these are required and installed in 8 to10-foot sidewalks as in other areas of Northgate and they can be relocated without damaging the bench. Design Review Board Page 1 of 3 June 11, 2010 CITY OF COU T.GF1 S-rxrTON Home of Trans Ati A9 Uniun_uty MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: 12 $250 Design Review Board Application Fee. ❑X Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided. ❑ Ten (10) samples of the proposed color (if applicable). ❑ Ten (10) copies of all alternative color/material schemes the chain or franchise has used (if applicable). ❑ Ten (10) copies of a letter from a licensed engineer or architect (if applicable). ❑ Ten (10) copies of the site plan showing the requested parking lot concept plan (if applicable). ❑ Ten (10) copies of the proposed mural (if applicable). Ten (10) copies of a parking study that supports a decrease in parking based upon reasonable assumptions of parking availability (if applicable). Additional materials may be required of the applicant such as material samples, elevations, site plans, and landscaping plans. The applicant shall be informed of any extra materials required. Date of Optional Preapplication Conference NAME OF PROJECT Aquarium Bar ADDRESS 209 University Drive LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision) Lot 2 Blk 8, W.C. Boyette Estate Addition APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name Bill Scarmardo Street Address 3200 CRANE AVE. City Bryan Phone Number 979.779.3336 State Texas PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name 200 University Drive, L.L.C. E-mail bill@scarmardo.com DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION APPEALS & WAIVERS - NORTHGATE DISTRICT STANDARDS Street Address 4928 Laure Street City Bellaire Phone Number Current zoning: NG-1 6.B.8.b.1, Sidewalk Standards Zip Code 77801 E-mail State Texas Fax Number waiver from: ewa enc es 5.6.B.9.a.1, Street trees Fax Number 979.779.3424 Zip Code 77401 10/09 Page 1 of 3 NORTHGATE DISTRICT STANDARDS APPEALSMAIVER REQUEST 1. The followin s ecific alternative to/waiver from the ordinance is requested: ttac ment 2. The unnecessary hardship(s) involved by meeting the provisions of the ordinance other than financial hardship is/are: 3. The following alternatives to the requested appeal/waiver are IN ADDITION, ANSWER THE FOLLOWING AS APPLICABLE (see the Unified Development Ordinance Section 5.6.6 Northgate Districts for more information): For the substitution of building materials, answer at least one of the following: Describe how the building material is a new or innovative material that has not been previously available to the market or verifv that the material is not listed as an allowed or prohibited material. 3. Explain how the material is an integral part of a themed building (e.g,. chrome on a 1950's-type diner). Explain why the allowed materials cannot be utilized without a structural alteration to the existing building. FdM Page 2 of 3 2. Explain how the material is similar and comparable in quality and appearance to the allowed For alternative materials on facade work on an existing building, answer the following: 2. Provide copies of a letter from a licensed engineer or architect verifying that a structural alteration is required to apply the permitted facade materials to the building. For waiver requests to building orientation and access, building transparency, sidewalk width, landscape, streetscape, and/or height requirements for existing buildings, describe the inherent site characteristics that constrain the proposed project from meeting ordinance requirements. For alternative building orientation and access for new buildings or existing building expansions or additions, answer at least one of the following: Describe the physical characteristics that limit the site from meeting ordinance requirements. 2. Describe the physical characteristics that provide unique orientation and access opportunities. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. Date I~ZloI lD 0 Print Form Page 3 of 3 For alternative building transparency for new construction, describe how the proposal substantially provides a level of Design Review Board Page 2 of 3 June 11, 2010 ITEM SUMMARY: UDO Section 5.6.B.8.b.1 requires a minimum 12-foot sidewalk along University Drive. The portion of sidewalk within the subject property ranges from 8 to10-foot wide. The existing sidewalk is constrained between the building's front facade wall and the TxDOT right-of-way which contains metered parallel parking spaces. The applicant is requesting a waiver to the required widening of the sidewalk based on these constraints. UDO Section 5.6.B.9.a.1 requires a 4-inch caliper street tree every 25 feet along University Drive. As part of this requirement, street trees are to be placed within the 5- foot square tree grate found in the City's Site Design Standards. Along with the street tree, a street bench is required every 50 feet of frontage per UDO Section 5.6.B.9.c. The applicant is requesting a waiver to both standards based on the existing width of the sidewalk. Street trees and benches are required on all streets in Northgate, including other streets where sidewalks are only required to be 8 to 10-feet wide. Staff has identified maintaining and enhancing the existing planter box at the front as a possible alternative to the street tree. Another alternative would be to place a large portable planter along the front facade. ITEM BACKGROUND: The Aquarium Bar is a new business that is proposed to be located in the old floral shop between Schozti's and Zapatos fronting University Drive near Wellborn Road. The interior and roof of the building were demolished in 2008 leaving the perimeter walls and foundation. A full site plan is required for this development which is being vertically extended to add a second floor for a roof top bar. The Texas Department of Transportation is currently discussing plans for the future widening of University Drive through the Northgate District. These discussions have also involved the streetscaping and sidewalk improvements along this right-of-way. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the sidewalk width waiver request based on the existing constraints of the site. Staff also recommends approval of an alternative to the required street tree due to the future TxDOT widening project along University Drive. Staff recommends denial of the street bench waiver request as these are required and installed in 8 to10-foot sidewalks as in other areas of Northgate and they can be relocated without damaging the bench. ISSUES FOR REVIEW: 1. Section 5.6.B.4.o - Relief from the sidewalk width standard when bringing an existing sidewalk up to current standard where existing physical conditions prohibit the sidewalk expansion. 2. Section 5.6.B.4.p - Alternatives to the Landscape and Streetscape Standards for projects utilizing an existing structure if it can be proven by the applicant that Design Review Board Page 3 of 3 June 11, 2010