Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
12/10/2004 - Regular Agenda Packet - Design Review Board
F • CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning&Development Services Agenda Design Review Board Friday, December 10, 2004 Administrative Conference Room City Council Office 1101 Texas Avenue 10:30 a.m. 1. Call to Order. 2. Consider absence requests. 3. Discussion, consideration and possible action to approve meeting minutes for November 12, 2004. • 4. Discussion, consideration, and possible action on proposed lighting elements for Wolf Pen Ice Rink, located at 400 Holleman Drive East in the Wolf Pen Creek Design District. (JP 03-316) S. Discussion of Northgate Ordinance. (KFoutz) 6. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Design Review Board Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 7. Adjourn. The building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive services must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3517 or(TDD) 1-800-735-2989. a ■ CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning&Development Services Minutes Design Review Board November 12, 2004 11:00 AM Board Members Present: George McLean, Bill Trainor, Richard Benning, Alan King, Fred Patteson, Scott Shafer, and Nancy Sawtelle. Board Members Absent: None Staff Present: Planning and Development Services Director Joey Dunn, Economic Development Director Kim Foutz, Staff Planners Molly Hitchcock, Jennifer Prochazka, Staff Assistants Mandi Alford, Deborah Grace. Others Present: Larry Haskins, Jessica Jimmerson, Skylar Bell, and Bryan Fetz AGENDA ITEM NO. 1: Call to order. Chairman Shafer called the meeting to order at 11:09 AM. AGENDA ITEM NO.2: Consider absence requests. All were present. AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Discussion, consideration and possible action to approve meeting minutes for October 18,2004, and November 5, 2004. Mr. Trainor motioned to approve the minutes. Mr. King seconded the motion, which passed unopposed(7-0). The applicant was not present for the discussion on Ozona Bar and Grill, therefore, Chairman Shafer moved to agenda item no. 5. • r AGENDA ITEM NO. 5: Discussion of Northgate Ordinance (KFoutz). Economic Development Director Foutz went over the proposed ordinance. After a • lengthy discussion it was decided that it would take several meetings for the Board to cover the Northgate Ordinance thoroughly and therefore agreed to meet December 10, 2004 at 10:30 AM. Chairman Scott Shafer excused himself from the meeting and turned the meeting over to Alan King. AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Discussion, consideration and possible action on a Site Plan for a deck addition and parking waiver for Ozona Bar and Grill, located at 520 Harvey Rd (04-19 JP). Staff Planner Prochazka presented the staff report stating that the applicant is proposing a deck addition to the east fagade of the existing restaurant. The proposed deck addition is 2,400 square feet and is made of wood; the two fireplaces included with the addition are made of limestone, and accents are stainless steel. The deck incorporates several existing trees in the design. The addition extends into the required Wolf Pen Creek dedication area; this is permitted by the Wolf Pen Creek Master Plan. Also, the applicant has requested a parking waiver for the deck addition. The requested waiver is for 38 parking spaces. Lighting samples were also brought forward for approval. Mr. Trainor motioned to approve the lighting as proposed, Mr. McLean seconded the motion, which passed unopposed(6-0). • Mr. Benning motioned to approve the site plan as proposed, Mr. Trainor seconded the motion, which passed unopposed(6-0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 6: Discussion and possible action on future agenda items— A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. ➢ Northgate Ordinance AGENDA ITEM NO 7: ADJOURN. Mrs. Sawtelle motioned to adjourn the meeting which was seconded by Mr. McLean, and passed unopposed(6-0). APPROVED: Scott Shafer, Chairman • ATTEST: Mandi Alford, Staff Assistant • • z ' • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD WOLF PEN CREEK DESIGN DISTRICT STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Jennifer Prochazka Date: December 10, 2004 E-mail:jprochazka@cstx.gov For WOLF PEN CREEK ICE RINK(SDSP)—DESIGN DISTRICT REVIEW 03-316 Location: 400 Holleman Drive East Applicant: Fidelis Ventures, L.L.C. — Bill Mather, owner Item Summary: This is a review of the Wolf Pen Creek Ice Rink lighting details. The site plan, landscaping, and all other design elements were approved by the Design Review Board earlier this year. The proposed lighting meets the requirements of Section 5.6.A.4, Wolf Pen Creek Lighting, and Section 7.10 Lighting of the Unified Development Ordinance. • Items Issued for Review: 1. Lighting details Signage will come before this Board at a later date. Attachments: 1. Application 2. Location map 3. Site plan 4. Details i FOR OFFICE USE ONLY/ n C3 CASE NO.: 0'�l^^-�l ( • �� . \ DATE SUBMITTED./„p(-1� DESIGN DISTRICT SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION ' Design Review Board (Check one) ❑ NG-1 ❑ NG-2 ❑ NG-3 [Et'wPC ❑ Ov Staff Review Only MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Special District site plan application completed in full. $200.00 Application Fee. $200.00 Special District Review Fee (not required for OV district) $200.00 Development Permit Application Fee. $600.00 Public Infrastructure Inspection Fee if applicable. (This fee is payable if construction of a public waterline, sewerline, sidewalk, street or drainage facilities is involved.) t� Ten (10) folded copies of site plan, landscape plan, and dimensioned building elevations (including signage) Color and material samples. a J-s&,� A copy of the site plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief a planation as to why they are not checked off. Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of • approval (if applicable). Date of Required Preapplication Conference: NAME OF PROJECT A/OGf' AEN GifbZ!k lar RINk ADDRESSGlI`/i1'11/ AQ/1lo LEGAL DESCRIPTION _�07` 3,�' lt'ttI. MAW ^.146e APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): Name AVOWS IIM77//2ETl U16 4GAIC I!W 7014VINC- ) Street Address 1IlZ7 . -LA B�'?i Zal eN. City fr'V(ityD/✓ State T�71'/4S Zip Code 77079 E-Mail Address Pirmoo-Mcf e,/�y Phone Number 713/705-4y25 Fax Number 2811966-168'2 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name -5+06 457 I'70 961e IV 7" Street Address City State Zip Code E-Mail Address Phone Number Fax Number ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name 77MV /1'f4WIVG72W hV0 4W-tvGpA/G '5 DAvID St0+17zf-R/ Street Address �I R1t/1l7i !n"If- City &;6 'NA/ is State /}S Zip Code 77,043 E-Mail Address dS/a&C/'V Phone Number 252-1324 Fax Number 6/13/03 Page 1 of 6 • OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact, i.e. project manager, potential buyer, local contact, etc.) Name /_61 v/G gW6W0W) Glo YMPA(/G/4' Mog&W Street Address Olt AA11 VEX6# 101fille, City 6PU466- %*f7VIV State 7tX^ Zip Code 770 E-Mail Address MifG�+tkati�r�e rctAn.Go/» Phone Number 6g63 Fax Number ./ PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY 44,44" T PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY AW IGS SChf7NG AMC VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED AND REASON(S) #OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED #OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED ZZ3 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PARKLAND DEDICATION • Total Acreage #of Multi-Family Dwelling Units Floodplain Acreage X$452 = $ Housing Units #of acres in floodplain #of 1 Bedroom Units #of acres in detention #of 2 Bedroom Units #of acres in greenways #of 3 Bedroom Units date dedication approved by Parks Board #of 4 Bedroom Units COMMERCIAL FOR BEDROOM UNITS ONLY Total Acreage 4(,'Z34- #Bedrooms = 132 sq. ft. Building Square Feet ODD #Bedrooms < 132 sq.ft. Floodplain Acreage d.0 NOTE: Parkland Dedication fee is due prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correct. Signature of Owner,Agent or Applicant Date 6/13/03 Page 2 of 6 2 0 l� 3 �oGT 1RTARD 0 4 4 �P hyo WE T WOLF 5 q 3 WPC DEDICATION B I AREA PC WPC PEN CREEK WOLF PEN 2 CREEK 1 PARK Lot 1B WPC , WPC DEDICATION 10 o s Lot lA AREA H � # A ,,s 2 6^, T97 �\ �O� WP{I 61 16 ny sse 15 car �� �Awe ss 62 14 v- ulav `P9 9 far SFA) \.,� 0 B D 13 poh ��1 a�'�9psv 7 8 Jl 1t 1 7 ti 6 6 h 1 J2 13 C - / Opti 5 B ti 11 \ �� ti 12 2 20, %V 6 6 ti 4 5 B q�\titi 1 vo .� i 1 1 R ?0 7 ti 0Si ti �9 5 \ 8 \ a 14 F� 5 0 4 7A\�ti \� 10 8�� \t ti 13 ti 5A ti 3 ti ti� 8 9 19 34 PEN \ \ 12 13 �� h 8 17 18 1 13� 68 ��Z 2303 33 800 3 ` �\p 11 �� 138 7 ti o 6 \ o 7 T R 0 Y 16 1304 , 67 2302 �� 2305 31 s Z AC / 12 13A h ti 5 h j� 1 G 3 1j0 1309 O 1707i \ry � P A 2 � 1 8 15� PAF,�h 2}0 15 66 2306� 2309p 40 PDD 14 0 �G 1 18 6 C-A 29 39 5 ti",GG ti"�18 17 14 641308 231 28 11�\ 632 39 �� 2 q 13 �. 18 14 31 3 13 11 n 9 OA 0B I �� ti 3 ~ 19 12 5 50� 23 G� 62 1314�� 2401 Q� tipo 8 B 6 38 h p� p 10 11 12 h 10 _`A3 NS\N O 61 1400 1A 7 403 405 401 11 �1� 6( 190 O J �° 7 59 2 ` 2 � r7 84 B8 �� 8 h 9 a PRINCETON CR H 21 502 8 0 58 2909 ' �� 6 �ti' 64 1 Sam 404 406 5 /� 9 oG� 57 14 Ci f College Station, Texas � WOLF ICE RINK I case: RB III DOPMENT REVIEW 03-316 of H Mandi Alford - NG presentation 12-10-04 ppt _ Page 1 • ..:� .. :. • Mandi Alford - NG presentation 12-10-04.ppt Page 2 • ag*,...i. �,.�„"� 'ssi�:. �:�.�X.;..p�,k���•� "Y`w�>i,p � 3* i�iiv�.�',,b „m a rtyy 'have fre signage • Man$Alford - NGpresentation 12100 p% Page � : §� .f � � Mandi Alford - NG presentation 12-10-04.ppt Page 4 • ; x v!' • Mandi Alford - NG presentation 12-10-04.ppt Page 5 • aj i # • ��r �T � ��r�yh Dnp • Man$&ford - NGpee! tion 12100 pM Page � w � Mandi Alford - NG presentation 12-10-04.ppt Page 7 • a .5 •�'.7ve�y��F „< "^ ? g 'r ,�; xgFar �:,a�rW,r �. p r # � .Aa ''.�.� .f..�+�� Ss3 ,:',G'zx.'� v� ���'._ a rib •r'& • 1 Mandi Alford - NG presentation 12-10-04.ppt Page 8 • 4 {,, , .w,., �,,, �� Y •i e�&:��3� �.tea;' .�''>3', � Mandi Alford - NG presentation 12-10-04.ppt Page 9 • �Y tq� AS • Mandi Alford - NG presentation 12-10-04.ppt Page 10 • R �s 3r :.� �k i � �; •�'•' .may>5 •� 5�� �3• ,,, k� x. � �, � '��N'x Mandi Alford - NG presentation 12-10-04.ppt Page 11 fv� • Page 12j' f entation 12-10-04 ppt Mandi Alford -NG pres f 1 Mandi Alford - NG presentation 12-10-04.ppt Page 13 • • �Y 3�w 'sa� k' �,�f a f�:/ �a#" 'AE�,.�6�,��3 =: F d .., :�: w .Y Pf Y#� �.4v4P „ • Mandi Alford - NG presentation 12-10-04.ppt Page 14 0 Yi "red q F � •� 4 � ���' �� y�r' ` III w is �»� „� i a �'> _ xr `• e;, �� ,ass ,$...E A,��� w •�' � u�v.b ��,,. • Mandi Alford - NG presentation 12-10-04.ppt Page 15 i ,� thf�s L, 4 °� .,�, � •� g • ( Man$&%m - NG presentation 12 10 0.p! Page 16 � ,\ `T *x\ ± 49 ^« & � Mandi Alford - NG presentation 12-10-04.ppt Page 17 • y„ .. MAN its T n rn�m �r of c iacPc a1ln�xrPc r i C ,:?` " • r Mandi Alford - NG presentation 12-10-04.ppt Page 18 J • b• • Mandi Alford - NG presentation 12-10-04.ppt Page 19 • 14 Y ". . f. • r Mandi Alford - NG presentation 12-10-04.ppt Page 20 -' ' _:,�. .... ,. .:��_"� m:e asp �?L. ''� z& ,tl5.•,�.•. ;rr ,• .a • Mandi Alford - NG presentation 12-10-04.ppt _ Page 21 ? r rc + +e r� i zo . • Mandi Alford - NG presentation 12-10-04.ppt Page 22 r • I s d"-' .•l- �. . • �,�.__ . d, �. aW`{ 6� � s' J N I l N J l l � 1 1 S � �� ��� �; x� �� _....- A V .A L U M E One look and it's obvious. Site lighting has a sleek new look.A look that immediately says quality. Instant impact both by day and by night. It's Avalume, from Emco. Economy Without Compromise Avalume will cast a long shadow First, because its two-piece housing is diecast. The mounting arm is an integral component of the diecastings, suitable for mounting to both round and square poles. Second, that long shadow will be cast from luminaires with highly efficient lighting distributions... high lumen packages to 400MH enable a signifi- cantly higher mounting and greater distance between poles. The Avalume was designed for a ` horizontally positioned lamps resulting in a cut-off, • Dark Sky friendly luminaire. The result is big savings Note eased edges at every corner to reduce EPA wind loading,and the thoughtful transition from luminaire in initial project and long-term maintenance costs. to pole it's clear that this is the most thoughtful approach to value-priced luminaires to date. Efficiency Without Compromise The quality of a cutoff luminaire is measured by how well it controls and distributes light. The optical reflector r, system of the Avalume adds another dimension to the performance and economy of the luminaire. Precisely aligned to distribute light in controlled patterns, _ this sophisticated segmented optical system provides high efficiencies, uniform distri- bution and superior brightness control. Type 3 and Type F distributions are offered. Glare is of course minimized at normal viewing angles. s The system is also customizable, providing • sharp cutoff of light via a house-side shield for applications such as sites adjacent to residential locations. r JL i Value Without Compromise The Avalume's sleek form is a refreshing, softer form that both cheats the wind and strengthens the assembly. The two-piece .� • diecast aluminum housing is ribbed not only to enhance an already stunning sculpted form, but to act as a heat sink to help lower ballast operating temperatures and extend service life. The tempered flat-glass lens is mated to the luminaire with silicone gaskets to keep out unwanted elements such as insects, dust and moisture and ensure a long-lasting, maintenance-free fixture. The Avalume is also capable of seamlessly mounting to a davit arm or mast arm pole. Specify the mast arm fitter (MF) option for use with these applications. When vandal resistance is a primary concern,Avalume also offers solutions.These luminaires are featured with vandal resistant options that include a stainless steel wire guard, polycarbonate lens(used in tandem with the standard • tempered glass lens)and tamper-resistant hardware. I AVAL. UME 0RDER. ING PREFIX CONFIGURATION DISTRIBUTION WATTAGE VOLTAGE FINISH OPTIONS • — — H � AW AVA 1 3 150HPS 120 BRP Bronze Paint HS External House Side Shield Single Assembly IES Type III 250HPS 208 BLP Black Paint LF In-Pole fusing/In-Line Fusing 2090 F 400HPS 240 WP White Paint (Kit includes in-line fuses) Twin©90° IES Type IV 175MH 277PC Locking Type Photocontrol 2 Forward Throw 250MH 347 NP Natural Paint Receptacle w/Photocontrol Twin @ 180° 40OMH 480 BGP Beige Paint Limited to 1000W maximum combined 3150PSMH OC Optional Color Paint luminaire wattage.(Not available with 48OV) Triple @ 90' 250PSMH Specify RAL designation PCR Locking Type Photocontrol 3®120 40OPSMH as shown in the Color Receptacle Only Triple @ 120° Selection Guide ex: Limited to 1000W maximum combined 4 OG-RAL7024 luminaire wattage. Quad Assembly SC Special Color Paint MF Mast Arm Fitter W HPS High Pressure Sodium (Must supply color chip) PTF2 Pole Top Fitter(2%"x 4") Wall Mount, MH Metal Halide PTF3 Pole Top Fitter(3°-31r,'x 6") Recessed J-Box PSMH Pulse Start Metal Halide PTF4 Pole Top Fitter(31-2'-4"x 6") (J-Box by others) QS Quartz Standby(15OW maximum. Not available with 480V) WG Wire Guard POLY External Polycarbonate Shield A V A L U M E D I M E N S 1 0 N S I I I 5.83"� 16.5' � ti 16° !I QUICK SHIP PROGRAM The Avalume marries quality construction with service.The Avalume in-stock units allow Emco to meet the quick-turn needs of many projects. Quick Ship products are bronze painted only Wattages available are: 250MH,400MH, 250HPS and 400HPS Ballasts are 5 Tap(120/208/240/277/480—tied to 277 Volt). All other configurations(finishes,wattages,etc.)carry a 4-week leadtime. Consult your local Emco representative for all service details. 2661 Alvarado Street San Leandro,CA 94577 800/227-0758 510/357-6900 in California • Fax:510/357-3088 � ® vrww.siteligMing.hting.com LIGHTING O Copyright 2004 Gen/)de Thomas Group LLC • All Rights Reserved • International Copyright Secured • 79304-20/0404 • CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning d Development Services Minutes Design Review Board November 12, 2004 11:00 AM Board Members Present: George McLean, Bill Trainor, Richard Benning,Alan King, Fred Patteson, Scott Shafer, and Nancy Sawtelle. Board Members Absent: None Staff Present: Planning and Development Services Director Joey Dunn, Economic Development Director Kim Foutz, Staff Planners Molly Hitchcock, Jennifer Prochazka, Staff Assistants * Mandi Alford, Deborah Grace. • Others Present: Larry Haskins, Jessica Jimmerson, Skylar Bell, and Bryan Fetz AGENDA ITEM NO. 1: Call to order. Chairman Shafer called the meeting to order at 11:09 AM. AGENDA ITEM NO.2: Consider absence requests. All were present. AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Discussion, consideration and possible action to approve meeting minutes for October 18,2004, and November 5,2004. Mr. Trainor motioned to approve the minutes. Mr. King seconded the motion, which passed unopposed(7-0). The applicant was not present for the discussion on Ozona Bar and Grill, therefore, Chairman Shafer moved to agenda item no. 5. r AGENDA ITEM NO. 5: Discussion of Northgate Ordinance (KFoutz). Economic Development Director Foutz went over the proposed ordinance. After a lengthy discussion it was decided that it would take several meetings for the Board to cover the Northgate Ordinance thoroughly and therefore agreed to meet December 10, 2004 at 10:30 AM. Chairman Scott Shafer excused himself from the meeting and turned the meeting over to Alan King. AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Discussion, consideration and possible action on a Site Plan for a deck addition and parking waiver for Ozona Bar and Grill, located at 520 Harvey Rd (04-19 JP). Staff Planner Prochazka presented the staff report stating that the applicant is proposing a deck addition to the east fagade of the existing restaurant. The proposed deck addition is 2,400 square feet and is made of wood; the two fireplaces included with the addition are made of limestone, and accents are stainless steel. The deck incorporates several existing trees in the design. The addition extends into the required Wolf Pen Creek dedication area; this is permitted by the Wolf Pen Creek Master Plan. Also, the applicant has requested a parking waiver for the deck addition. The requested waiver is for 38 parking spaces. Lighting samples were also brought forward for approval. Mr. Trainor motioned to approve the lighting as proposed, Mr. McLean seconded the motion, which passed unopposed(6-0). • Mr. Benning motioned to approve the site plan as proposed, Mr. Trainor seconded the motion, which passed unopposed(6-0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 6: Discussion and possible action on future agenda items— A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. ➢ Northgate Ordinance AGENDA ITEM NO 7: ADJOURN. Mrs. Sawtelle motioned to adjourn the meeting which was seconded by Mr. McLean, and passed unopposed(6-0). • APPROVED: Scott Shafer, Chairman • ATTEST: Mandi Alford,Staff Assistant • • r • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD WOLF PEN CREEK DESIGN DISTRICT STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Jennifer Prochazka Date: December 10, 2004 E-mail:jprochazka@cstx.gov For WOLF PEN CREEK ICE RINK(SDSP)—DESIGN DISTRICT REVIEW(03-316) Location: 400 Holleman Drive East Applicant: Fidelis Ventures, L.L.C. — Bill Mather, owner Item Summary: This is a review of the Wolf Pen Creek Ice Rink lighting details. The site plan, landscaping, and all other design elements were approved by the Design Review Board earlier this year. The proposed lighting meets the requirements of Section 5.6.A.4, Wolf Pen Creek Lighting, and Section 7.10 Lighting of the Unified Development Ordinance. • Items Issued for Review: 1. Lighting details Signage will come before this Board at a later date. Attachments: 1. Application 2. Location map 3. Site plan 4. Details • FOR OFFICE USE ONLY, n C3A CASE NO.: 0 �) V' • V� DATE SUBMITTED:/,�-I1 - DESIGN DISTRICT SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION Y Design Review Board (Check one) ❑ NG-1 ❑ NG-2 ❑ NG-3 ewPC ❑ Ov Staff Review Only MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS ' Special District site plan application completed in full. $200.00 Application Fee. 14 $200.00 Special District Review Fee (not required for OV district) $200.00 Development Permit Application Fee. $600.00 Public Infrastructure Inspection Fee if applicable. (This fee is payable if construction of a public waterline, sewerline, sidewalk, street or drainage facilities is involved.) V111, Ten (10) folded copies of site plan, landscape plan, and dimensioned building elevations (including signage) Color and material samples. a do&-,bec,, A copy of the site plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief a planation as to why they are not checked off. n► m Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of • approval (if applicable). Date of Required Preapplication Conference: /2-9-o 3 NAME OF PROJECT k1.06f" Aew Clen!k_ /4r R/N,- ADDRESS 1101'aPt 1V P'Q11165 LEGAL DESCRIPTION �07` 3R /"D LLfxMAAt /°cif 6C APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): Name AMUS 1/MOV4 E3, 14,4 lU A/Ot•9'L 1PAV Al tom ) AM, Jul fl t#vZ Street Address 13127 ,(�/h/B1 z f eN. City ffDvsyoN State r�i f� Zip Code 7`7079 E-Mail Address IN einoo-the ' �e74r�I,%Go�J Phone Number Fax Number 28111,66-apra PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name _54W6 If A47f,0Ue -1V7- Street Address City State Zip Code E-Mail Address Phone Number Fax Number ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name DVv1y SzATa—RY / 94YIX6-Azki; AVO -14V-f1/477A11,- 56 P,#V/D S'eof -R/ Street Address -zpev/ A4'?1*ACity • State Tom_ Zip Code 7A043 E-Mail Address dst m&ef Caf-7GiL,i► Phone Number 25.2-?324 Fax Number 713I461-1541 6/13/03 Page 1 of 6 r f � • OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact, i.e. project manager, potential buyer, local contact, etc.) Name A#ff,6GZ 4M A&W,U P EW611VOW) Glo W&ON160f Moitbho Street Address Olt U1V11/BN0jHy P&ff_6 City !vPac6r_- S�QnI State 7tX^ Zip Code 77mD E-Mail Address VAPri1ieh^lone/aArl,co/n Phone Number _giv 2&P- 6g63 Fax Number PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY 41.4 41vr PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY AW 4lX YtPrtNG ,el&C VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED AND REASON(S) #OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED #OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED ZZ-11 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PARKLAND DEDICATION • Total Acreage #of Multi-Family Dwelling Units Floodplain Acreage X$452 = $ Housing Units #of acres in floodplain #of 1 Bedroom Units #of acres in detention #of 2 Bedroom Units #of acres in greenways #of 3 Bedroom Units date dedication approved by Parks Board #of 4 Bedroom Units COMMERCIAL FOR 2 BEDROOM UNITS ONLY Total Acreage ¢•�3¢ #Bedrooms = 132 sq. ft. Building Square Feet 4S;oea # Bedrooms < 132 sq. ft. Floodplain Acreage 0.0 NOTE: Parkland Dedication fee is due prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correct. cz- Signature of Owner, Agent or Applicant Date 6/13/03 Page 2 of 6 2 0 JR oARD 4 � P WE T WOLF 5 A 3 WPC DEDICA B-/ AREA PEN CREEK WOLF PEN 2 CREEK PARK Lot 1B WPC WPC DEDICATION L10 ` Lot to AREA L:E :q: PL p a I97 16 rrP{.I 0�,'�0 `. 62 \s P ,o cm a \ ti a 10 ^� \\ V �� 7 73 " 6 B titiy 11 `0 X12 ti\1 J PEN �, ti 1`0 1J 3 ^�` 18 12 \ B 17 2}p0 1� 2101 A 2\\ ti\� 13B 7 '�\ 6 \ 7 TROY 16 2�, 2�1 68 1301� 210532 Bis A3 C-! \� ' 11 1p Z 13A h °� \° 5 �\ \°6 15 k ��2}0}2�� 67 1104 O 130731 Z A P q ZA 3 4 �p �}� p� 1}p5 15 66 1106 2 TwO PDD 14 �' 16 c 9 TJOB 1JJ ti�\°G��ti�118 17 14 64 � 18 3 4 13 ti v 19 18 1J 1�1 6J?31Jr1 Jl 38 1 \ pti l0 11 12 12 5 G G( 661 1114 77� 2401 2 ti 20 NS�N 24 407 11 0 60 240 2 6PRINCETONCR 11 �b 501 8 7 1—c 558 1404, 7 �n� z5 S sm ►0h 14 9 57 Ci f College Station, Texas III WOLF P ICE RINK I case. RB D OPMENT REVIEW I 03-316 Mandl Alford-NG presentationm12-10-04.pp4 • • a� ^� �`�;,�..�a.,, k .„ rt� ro •�;' <�,,,��«. ..���p,I�'« _`� � .. ..ate:?' . . ,_ -�5�""`.. ',ad: Mand Alford -NG pre sentation'12-10-04.ppt _ Page 2 f • - :; • Mandi Alford- NG resentation 12-10-04. t Page 3] • • • L Mandi Alford - NG presentation 12-10-04. t Page 4 • • k :d • __ r Nlandi Alford - N_ pre 12-10-04. t � . ., PoM. .tl Page 5 r • • LMandf Alford-NGresentation 12-10-04. t dw m ' .... . Page'6 it • •� aW< .f ;atm• •�'a'3., • Mandi Alford - NG presentation 12-10-04.ppt p Pa e 7 • • • � --- -- - --- '-- --==- -- -- --'-- ----'--' - ---- ' -8l � `°e� " . � � � Mandi Alford,-Nb resentation 12-1, -94,.p Pa e 9 • • • Maggi Alford- NG presentation 12-10-04. t " " Page,10 • • • _J Mandi Alford - NG presentation 12-10-04.ppt µ Page 11 • • • -'J�G tpn 1?:16-6 pp Page'l 2 ............... ......... .... Mandi Alford - NG resentation 12-10-04. t Pa a 13 • • • Nlandi Alford - NG resentation 12-10-04. pt Pae 14 • • Mandl Alford-NG presentation 12-10-04.ppt Page 15 • • • [.•—.,. .w m,w...;«. —..•w r.v nn.r .. +v,.mm r„n.r.«n.. ,.,. ..n .. .r• Mandl Alford+_NG presentation 12-10-04.ppt w+ „+ r Page 16 • • p6$ • Mandi Alford - NG presentation 12-10-04. t Pale 17 I • • • Mandi Alford,-- N presentation12-10-04.ppt - Page 18 • • • Nandi Alford-NG resentation 12-10-04 19 • • • Mand,Alford -N4Gmµ'resentation 12-1'0-04. t page 20 • • Mandi Alford-NG'ry resentation 12-10-04. t ' W Page 21 • ' 4 M. . w. • Mandi Alford- NG presentation 12-10-04. t W Page 22 • t • CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning er Development Services Minutes Design Review Board December 10, 2004 10:30 AM Board Members Present: George McLean, Richard Benning, Alan King, Fred Patteson, Scott Shafer, and Nancy Sawtelle. Board Members Absent: Bill Trainor Staff Present: Planning and Development Services Director Joey Dunn, Economic Development Director Kim Foutz, Staff Planners Molly Hitchcock, Jennifer Prochazka, and Staff Assistant Mandi Alford Others Present: Larry Haskins and David Slattery AGENDA ITEM NO. 1: Call to order. Chairman Shafer called the meeting to order at 10:38 AM. AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Consider absence requests. Bill Trainor Mr.King motioned to approve the request. Ms. Sawtelle seconded the motion, which passesd unopposed(6-0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Discussion, consideration and possible action to approve meeting minutes for November 12,2004. Ms. Sawtelle motioned to approve the minutes. Mr. Benning seconded the motion, which passed unopposed(6-0). • AGENDA ITEM NO.4: Discussion, consideration andP ossible action on • proposed lighting elements for Wolf Pen Ice Rink, located at 400 Holleman Drive East in the Wolf Pen Creek Design District. (JP 03-316) • Staff Planner Prochazka presented the staff report stating that this is a review of the Wolf Pen Creek Ice Rink lighting details. Ms. Prochazka stated that the Design Review Board earlier this year had approved the site plan, landscaping plan and all other elements. The proposed lighting meets the requirements of Section 5.6.A.4, Wolf Pen Creek Lighting, and Section 7.10 Lighting of the Unified Development Ordinance. Mr. Benning questioned why the Design Review Board was seeing this case. Ms. Prochazka explained the Design Review Board would see cases if they do not meet the standard lighting already approved for Wolf Pen Creek. Mr. Slattery explained the reasoning for choosing the lighting was that it fit best with the buildings architectural design. Mr. Benning motioned to approve the lighting elements as presented, Mr. McLean seconded the motion, which passed unopposed(6-0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 5: Discussion of Northgate Ordinance(KFoutz). Economic Development Director Foutz presented the board with handouts that described the proposed vision for Northgate / Northgate Ordinance and sample provisions to implement the plan. Ms. Foutz went through the process of implementing the plan. Onsite meetings will be held for property owners on January 12, 2005 in Northgate, for merchants on January 14,2005 in Northgate, and an accumulative of the two will be held on January 18, 2005 at the City Conference Center if there are not any scheduling • conflicts with the Merchants Association. After the meetings the, ordinance will go through work shops and then it would go to the Planning and Zoning Commission and finally to City Council. Mr. Benning asked how the merchants and property owners would be notified of the meetings. Ms. Foutz stated that tax records are used to notify the merchants and property owners and a database from previous leaders of the Merchants Association is also used. There would also be poster put up the district advertising the meetings. Ms. Foutz stated that the look they are trying to acquire in all Northgate Districts is urban and dense type of development. This will continue to emphasize pedestrian orientation, and mixed use. Architectural standards provisions would be somewhat similar to what is in the Unified Development Ordinance for the non-residential standards. However, some of those things are not applicable, such as parking, and some building articulation because it is being looked at from a different scale. Building orientation is important to accomplish the overall redevelopment plan which is trying to focus everything internal to Church Avenue, University Drive and the Promenade. There will be tree-lined streets and wider brick paved sidewalks. There will be specific provisions that if all requirements are met that accomplish the theme of the district, then the administrator could approve the application. However, if the applicant diverges in any respect to any of the provision then the Design Review Board will hear the appeals of the provision. It is recommended because Northgate is a pedestrian oriented area that there will be a limitation on the size of retail tenants. • -__------,The following are proposed visions-for NG-1 Core Commercial. NG-1 will still primarily remain commercial but will allow mix uses. There will be some limitations on residential being on the first floor. There will be a maximum of 10,000 sq. ft. per single retail except with a variance. Zero lot line development and minimum two stories with . minimum floor to area ration will still be allowed which already exists in the ordinance. NG-2 is a transitional area. The area could be commercial only as it currently stands or it could be mixed use. The maximum sq. ft. allowed is 50,000 feet per single unit. All new development would have a requirement of a 20 foot high building. There would be certain uses prohibited in the NG-2 area such as drive-thrus. However, there would be a strong grand fathering clause for drive-thrus. There may be restrictions added to that. There would be a maximum setback, but the number would be higher than the other NG districts. In NG-3 there will be mixed used allowed with limited commercial. The maximum sq. ft. allowed for a single retail tenant is 5,000 feet. Zero lot line will and minimum two stories with minimum floor to area ration will be allowed, which is already in the ordinance. Mr. Shafer suggested to Ms. Foutz that maybe the wording on the handouts to read as a vision statement. Ms. Foutz suggested that the districts may need to be renamed because of the mix used nature. Mr. Shafer agreed as well as Mr. King. Mr. Benning expressed his concerns about parking, if there is not parking then the consumer or businesses will not come to Northgate. Ms. Foutz stated that there is an evaluation in progress to allow on street parking back in certain areas. Ms. Foutz went over some of the provisions for the Northgate Ordinance that applies to all Northgate Districts. There would be build to lines, primary entrance fagade orientation would have to do with the major streets for instance Church Street, and University Drive which has two orientations Church St. or the Promenade depending on how the building is situated. Mr. Shafer suggested that dual facades be encouraged and some how be written in the ordinance. Architectural standards would be similar to the Unified Development Ordinance Non- residential Standards pedestrian scale. Ground floor transparency for commercial uses on facades abutting right of ways will be encouraged. When there is multi-family and the park fees have to be paid, the parks fees that have been collected have not been reinvested into the Northgate area. Ms. Foutz explained that the funds will be lost if they are not spent. Mr. Shafer suggested watching a film that talks about small urban spaces. The film gives suggestions on how to plan small places so people can use them. The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces is the name of the film. After some discussion it was determined that the Design Review Board should try and meet with the Parks Board on January 11, 2004 if there is room on the agenda. • AGENDA ITEM NO. 6: Discussion and possible action on future agenda items— A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given.Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place • the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. ➢ January 11, 2005 meeting with the Parks Board AGENDA ITEM NO 7: ADJOURN. Mrs. Sawtelle motioned to adjourn the meeting which was seconded by Mr. Benning, and passed unopposed(6-0). APPROVED: Scott Shafer, Chairman ATTEST: Mandi Alford,Staff Assistant • • • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Jennifer Prochazka Date: January 20, 2005 Email: jprochazka@cstx.gov For BARBERSHOP BAR (04-289) Zoning District: NG-1, Core Northgate Location: 215 University Drive Applicant: Morgan Pyle Item Summary: The applicant is proposing to open the old Bill's Barbershop as a bar. There have been several facade changes to the building in the past year, including color and alterations to existing windows. Color samples will be provided at the meeting. The proposed sign will be applied to the existing facade, where the previous sign was located. • Item Background: This property came before the Design Review Board in 2004 for facade improvements in 2004. The improvements were never completed. Issues/items for Review: 1. Signage • Type • Design • Placement 2. Color 3. Architectural Elements Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map 2. Application 3. Copy of Sign and Facade Details • FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO. DATE SUBMITTED- -6 03 DESIGN DISTRICT BUILDING & SIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Design Review Board (Check one) NG-1 R NG-2 ❑ NG-3 R WPC D ov Staff Review Only MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Application complebid in full. _IX $200.00 Special District Application fee IvA Ten (10) folded copies of facade details (including signage) with dimensions. (for Facades only) - Ten (10) folded copies of sign details with dimensions. (for signs only) V`� Color and material samples. If attached signage is proposed, provide ten (10) copies of a building elevation showing sign placement. Date of Preapplication Conference: NAME OF BUSINESS Z" �rAiJ—t &i-ZI0(* L&96FtLSH of e*?, ADDRESS #EvAL DESICIRUPT',ON PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY I PjV1LV,&J(r — 0L> �PIVL%S'V-StAOQ PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY NipA) A_bn,:Cir� JZ, CA-,NdAo14 N94 APPLICANT'S INFORMATION: Name Mart, ?11 tf- Street Address Lt A -ew-Lop r,-,- City b(t�A-rJ State _rA Zip Code -77101 E-MailAddress Phone Number q,79- Fax Number PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name Btu- Street Address rz'+ fL_C4,-c F_j<- city State 77 Zip Code 7 age, ? E-Mail Address Phone Number(),"_) Fax Number 6/13/03 Page 1 of 2 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED EXTERIOR CHANGES 616, Jt.l k b-L S I Z-,- a-s C"--a S J�. � � j o,��- ��J- 6 z AND/OR d ATTACHED SIGN ❑ FREESTANDING SIGN Square Footage `� Square Footage All applications(except Overlaistrict applications) must be reviewed by the Design Review Board. Once a meeting is scheduled, th plica t will be notified of the date and time so that he can be present to discuss the proposal with the ard. Th applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated �erein and exhibits ttached h eto are true and correct. .6/� l Z2 /0Y Signur ent or�pplicant Date C r • 6/13/03 Page 2 of 2 n 0 s 0-9 3s -JrJ--.t o t to" 3aj C N b.L -.3 21 31 3;OLLVC3- Z 3 :d NQ+1.10/--"3 V",S a,N4J, 3t fe ore, -3-4L1 Q(J • - �t+a Lbw �$ ,\by �0 Q X311 s » z ivZ:G? tilt rstr�f fry n2 c16 -_ ,� L V a$'a'�� SI-4W +O \l t F k � r I } ;y49+Y a -gin Ift �- ; n :t 4 S i j 4 ` tq fK r �g i { a �-`i „'� 1 NORTHGATE ORDINANCE • PUBLIC INPUT: RE-OCCURING THEMES 1. Grandfathering a. Fagade renovations b. Maintenance of non-conforming structures & sites c. Strong grandfathering language for drive-thrus (behind building) d. When do the new requirements kick in? Do I have to bring my property up to the standard? 2. NG-2 transitional standards 3. Parkland dedication & funds / public space requirements 4. Parking caps 5. Redevelopment - drawing the line between "closer to the vision" vs. realizing the full vision 6. Architectural requirements - allow some "funky"ky"