HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/12/2004 - Regular Agenda Packet - Design Review Board CA.
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION I
Planning 6-Development Services 1
I
1
I
Agenda j
College Station Design Review Board
Friday, November 12, 2004
Administrative Conference Room
City Council Office
1101 Texas Avenue
11:00 a.m.
1. Call to Order.
2. Consider absence requests.
3. Discussion, consideration and passible action to approve meeting minutes for
October 18, 2004, and November 5, 2004.
4. Discussion, consideration, and possible action on a site plan for a deck addition and parking
waiver for Ozona Bar and Grill, located at 520 Harvey Road (04-19]P).
5. Discussion of Northgate Ordinance. (KFoutz)
6. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Design Review Board
Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A
statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be
given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an
agenda for a subsequent meeting.
7. Adjourn.
I
The building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive
services must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call
(979) 764-3517 or(TDD) 1-800-735-2989.
•
Minutes
Design Review Board
October 18, 2004
2:00 PM
Board Members Present: George McLean, Bill Trainor, Richard Benning, and Alan
King.
Board Members Absent: Dr. Phil Tabb and Scott Shafer.
Staff Present: Economic Development Director Kim Foutz, Development
Coordinator Bridgette George, Staff Planner Molly
Hitchcock, and Staff Assistant Mandi Alford
Others Present: Veronica Morgan, Wallace Philips, Joe Schultz, and James
Batenhorst
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 Call to order.
• Alan King, acting Chairman, called the meeting to order at 2:05 p.m.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Consider absence requests.for October 18, 2004 meeting
Dr. Phil Tabb
Scott Shafer
A motion was made to approve the absence requests, which passed unopposed(4-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Discussion consideration andossible action to approve
PProve
meeting minutes from October 8,2004.
Mr. Trainor motioned to approve the minutes. Mr. McLean seconded the motion,
which passed unopposed(4-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Discussion, consideration and possible action on a
Concept Plan for Spring Creek Gardens located at 4300 SH 6 South, approximately
%Z mile north of Greens Prairie Rd.west of SH 6 (04-114 MH)
Staff Planner Hitchcock presented the staff report stating that the Spring Creek Gardens
concept plan was originally adopted in June 2004. The applicant is requesting an
amendment to the concept plan allowing for the modification of sanitation standards
• which would allow individual trash containers instead of dumpsters. Ms. Hitchcock
stated that the UDO requires a 50-foot wide lot minimum in order to receive individual
trash containers. The adopted concept plan allows for 45-foot wide lots, for this
development which per the UDO, would require three (3) 12'X12' dumpster enclosures
in common areas allowing individual trash containers.
After some discussion, Mr. Benning motioned to approve the amendment as proposed.
Mr. Trainor seconded the motion, which passed unopposed(4-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5: Discussion of Northgate Ordinance(KF)
Economic Development Director Kim Foutz gave the presentation on bringing NG-2 to
NG-1 standards. She stated there would be some nonconformities such as drive-thrus,
fuel sales, outdoor health clubs, parking as a primary use (no longer conditional) and
retail over 50,000 feet. If an existing drive-thru were to remodel their business they
would not be allowed to continue having the drive-thru. The businesses on major roads
like University Drive and Church would not be able to have parking, office space (with
exceptions), or residential uses on the ground floor. Ms. Foutz stated that NG-2 does not
just have University Drive frontage it goes deeper into the district so the pedestrian
orientation is lost. Mr. Trainor asked if the current zoning map could be redrawn for the
Northgate districts. Mr. Benning expressed the need for the business owners in those
districts to be included in any changes in that area. There was discussion in length about
building design standards, parking, pedestrian access, streetscaping, and landscaping.
After reviewing a zoning map of Northgate, the Board members suggested that this issue
be discussed in the future when they have gone out and looked at the districts more
closely.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6: Presentation and discussion on the color palette for the
Non - Residential Standards Ordinance, Section 7.9 of the Unified Development
Ordinance. (04-169 KF)
Economic Development Director Kim Foutz informed the Board that the Planning and
Zoning Commission approved the DRB being the entity responsible for setting the color
standard palette for non-residential standards. The colors would be used for the primary
portion of certain buildings. Ms. Foutz stated that she would research whether the DRB
could have a say in the percentages of colors that are used. After reviewing the colors,the
Board members accepted the color palette, but stated that they would like to have a case-
by-case variance. Ms. Foutz stated that she would research their recommendation to limit
the ordinance to restaurants, but not to corporate branding. It was suggested that
applicants be required to present some previous work done in other areas so the Board
could review their proposal prior to making a decision.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7 Discussion and possible action on future agenda items—
A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has
not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of
existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place
the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
• No items were brought forward for discussion.
•
AGENDA ITEM NO 8 ADJOURN.
Mr. Trainor motioned to adjourn the meeting which was seconded by Mr. Mclean, and
passed unopposed(4-0).
APPROVED:
Scott Shafer, Chairman
ATTEST:
Mandi Alford, Staff Assistant
•
• Minutes
Design Review Board
November 5, 2004
11:30 a.m.
Board Members Present: Scott Shafer, Bill Trainor, Richard Benning, Alan King,
Nancy Sawtelle, Fred Patterson, and Robert Rayburn.
Board Members Absent: George McLean
Staff Present: Planning and Development Services Director Joey Dunn,
Economic Development Director Kim Foutz, Development
Coordinator Bridgette George, Staff Planner Molly
Hitchcock, Staff Planner Jennifer Prochazka, Staff Planner
Jennifer Reeves, Staff Planner Lindsay Boyer, Senior
Planner Trey Fletcher, Transportation Planner Ken Fogle,
Staff Assistant Deborah Grace, and Staff Assistant Mandi
Alford
• Others Present:
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 Call to order.
Chairman Scott Shafer, called the meeting to order at 11:45 a.m.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Oath of Office and Statement of Appointed Officer.
Staff Assistant Deborah Grace administered the Oath of Office and Statement of
Appointed Officer to Nancy Sawtelle,Fred Patterson and Robert Rayburn.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Training session on Design Review Board
responsibilities and review of the newly adopted Non-Residential Architectural
Standards.
Development Coordinator Bridgette George briefly discussed the meeting times,
locations, and absentee forms for the Design Review Board. Planning and Development
Services Director Joey Dunn and Economic Development Director Kim Foutz reviewed
the Non—Residential Architectural Standards with the Board members. Some discussion
took place regarding the standards including parking lot concepts and landscaping.
•
• DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
WOLF PEN CREEK DESIGN DISTRICT
STAFF REPORT
Project Manager: Jennifer Prochazka, Staff Planner Date: November 12, 2004
E-mail: jprochazka@cstx.gov
For
Ozona Bar& Grill - Deck Addition. — DESIGN DISTRICT REVIEW
Location: 520 Harvey Road
Applicant: NCA Architecture, applicant for Skylar Bell, property owner
Item Summary: The applicant is proposing a deck addition to the east facade of the
existing restaurant. The proposed deck addition is 2,400 square feet and is made of
wood, the two fireplaces included with the addition are made of limestone, and accents
are stainless steel. The deck incorporates several existing trees into the design. The
addition extends into the required Wolf Pen Creek dedication area; this is permitted by
• the Wolf Pen Creek Master Plan.
The applicant is requesting a parking waiver for the deck addition. The Unified
Development Ordinance gives the Design Review Board the ability to waive parking
space requirements if the Board feels that the development meets the goals of the
master plan for the district. Staff contends that the development does meet the intent of
the master plan because the addition is for outdoor dining that is orientation toward the
creek and is providing connections to future walking paths in the area. The requested
waiver is to 38 parking spaces. The site currently has 124 parking spaces on site.
Administrator Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the addition with the
condition that all comments included in Staff Review Comments No. 2 are addressed.
Issues/Items for Review:
1. Treatment of the minimum reservation area
2. Exterior lighting
3. Relationship of buildings to site and to adjoining area
4. Building design
5. Landscaping
Attachments:
1. Application
2. Site plan
• 3. Elevations of all building sides
4. Material samples
• 5. Staff Review Comments No.2
6. Letter requesting parking waiver
•
19 7,/o°' UNIVERSI TY
20 6W DST K
IN 5 OAKS OAKS R 6
0 R
2J T 3 4 ARK UP
32
REGENC
1 2 2
VILLAG
IR
COURTYARD 4 4
\40ACY APTS
VILLAGE B-1
1 . ...... 5
2
Zf T WOLF
WPC DEDICATION
c
4 AREA
B-1
R - 6 CREEK
6 ........
2
I
DFS Lot IB
I + wpc
WPC CATION H O L L E M A N
Lot 1A AREA Jr
C - 1 PLACE
2
41�797 -& 62 63 16
-�IA F& 14 41
ymwv
roam
a,
12
B-1 4 10 C 76 B D11 12
4
8 7A 10
14 8
21 WQJ.F PFN
INW-city'af C011M Station, Texas OZONAfr & GRILL Case: 04-19 RB
1351WOPM �T REVIEW
• STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2
Project: OZONA GRILL & BAR-DECK ADD.(SDSP) - 04-00500019
PLANNING
1. Please note that for a tree to receive 'protected points' the barricade must be
placed no closer to the tree than at the drip line.
2. Any trees that are required to meet planting requirements must be replaced
'caliper for caliper' if it dies.
3. All lighting needs to be approved by the Design Review Board. Please
submit information (including aesthetic information) with your next submittal.
4. All proposed plantings need to be on your property.
5. Please provide caliper information for all non-canopy trees proposed.
6. Please note that the parking islands nearest to the curb cut do not currently
have any approved ground cover. Please note on the plan the ground cover
that you are proposing.
Reviewed by: Jennifer Prochazka Date: September 3, 2004
•
ENGINEERING
1. In regard to the question of floodplain/ floodway location, City staff retrieved
the LOMR study that was done to revise the floodplain map to determine the
intent of the revision. This was done due to the inaccuracy of the FIRM. The
working map shows a similar floodplain/ floodway location as shown on your
plans. The Floodplain Administrator is comfortable with this determination.
2. Erosion control is a required component of construction, especially in the
floodplain.
3. Dedication of the drainage and public access easement is required with this
development.
Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson Date: October 11, 2004
• NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be
explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans
that have not been pointed out to the City,will constitute a completely new review.
2of2
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO.: 64 --
DATE
DATE SUBMITTED: A&-b4
A
R.
DESIGN DISTRICT SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION
Design Review Board
(Check one) ❑ NG-1 [J NG-2 F1 NG-3 ;K`wPC ❑ ov
Staff Review Only
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Special District site plan application completed in full.
$200.00 Application Fee.
$200.00 Special District Review Fee(not required for OV district)
$200.00 Developffi6nt Permit Application Fee. construction of a public
$600.00 Public Infrastructure Inspection Fee if applicable. (This fee is payable if co
waterline, sewedine, sidewalk, street or drainage facilities is involved.)
Ten (10) folded copies of site plan, landscape plan, and dimensioned building elevations (including
signage)
Color and material samples.
A copy of the site plan checklist With all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not
checked off.
Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of
approval(if applicable).
Date of Required Preapplication Conference:
NAME OF PROJECT 62-cHA (211111 L-L ^1417 'stn-. P0CkA1:>V I-r-Lo t4
ADDRESS 15sc 140eoey rz&7. 7g
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
APPLICANTIPROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION(Primary Contact for the Project):
Name SI<yt.^7- (A maflo-a' ,
Street Address 51-0 14A9.VUa-Y ZIP- ULL�C' ipy
State T. Zip Code -*7"78J40 E-Mail Address L4 Lf) q
Phone Number q7q -&JA4- J�Lt&_ Fax Number
PROPERTY OWNERS INFORMATION:
Name q:;V-Z> (2=WP
Street Address ;091-WW A-0115 1,010 6a city b-.0 Tt Pq
State Zip Code --:rJ TSH E-Mail Address
Phone Number M2ft Fax Number li2—
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEERS INFORMATION: 4c�
Nam AA wu
Street Address !6 4110 City .PA Z44--S
State :22M4 Zip Code .. E-Mail Address A&ez'e? Sim.4"11;
Phone Number 'f/9*- Fax Number W"/e
6/13/03 Page 1 of 6
OTHER CONTACTS Pease specify type of contact, i.e.project manager, potential buyer,local contact,etc.)
Name Al/A
Street Address City
State Zip Code E-Mail Address
Phone Number Fax Number
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY &A&Z-4-A-A40 AS&&
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY __0 P1'*PAWV 6_WAP_r I-Al 4.454-'
VARIANCE(S)REQUESTED AND REASON(S)
#OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED JZ /_ #OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED IZA4
MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PARKLAND DEDICATION
Total Acreage #of Multi-Family Dwelling Units
Floodplain Acreage X$452=$
Housing Units #of acres in floodplain
#of 1 Bedroom Units #of acres in detention
#of 2 Bedroom Units #of acres in greenways
#of 3 Bedroom Units date dedication approved by Parks Board
#of 4 Bedroom Units COMMERCIAL
FOR 2 BEDROOM UNITS ONLY Total Acreage /8
#Bedrooms = 132 sq.ft. Building Square Feet /4i/V? 64C
#Bedrooms < 132 sq.ft. Fioodplain Acreage 4,94
NOTE: Parkland Dedication fee is due prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.
The a#plicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached
heret-4-r4p true and correct.
Sign f ID-vtime gent or Applicant Date
6/13/03 Page 2 of 6
"EXHIBIT A"
August 17, 2004
Design Review Board
City of College Station
Development Services
1101 Texas Avenue South, P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
RE: Ozona Grill& Bar-Deck Addition
520 Harvey Rd.
College Station,TX
Members of the Design Review Board-T
In response to city comments dated January 30, 2004,we hereby request a parking waiver for
the Ozona-College Station located at 520 Harvey Road.
Current requirements for the property as of the current date are 124 spaces.We are requesting a
waiver of 38 parking spaces to accommodate the deck expansion to the side of Ozona Grill.
It is our view that the addition of the deck will add to the beauty of the Wolf Pen Creek master
plan.Creek pathway access facilities will be provided for pedestrians to enjoy the creek from
the deck.These facilities will be in the form of a ramp to the deck, stairway and new
landscaping to enhance the deck itself. In addition the side approach of the restaurant will now
be able to better address the many positive aspects of the Wolf Pen Creek preservation area.
If you have any further questions or comments, please feel free to call.
Sincerely,
nca Architecture
Loren Boynton
Associate
6500 Greenville Ave. Suite 307 Dallas,TX 75206 214.361.9901 Fax 361.9906 nca@ncoarchitecture.com
V�'andi Alford - DRB presentation 10-18-04.ppt Page 1
•
e. ;, .3'�$ ,�'rrE:. 5a¢��.. < .�3•' .{;'.>r; � ..RM, ,..... -''.«R _ yy 3'q!'i�f ` 5 .., .. .. tE
•
Mandi Alford - DRB presentation 10-18-04.ppt Page?
•
.. 3
1 M
�', �,, �ar�°;;.? g; ,X ,g � �� q-'�.i ?'•"W��:'-Yia'�X mz, � :?�. r 1';p s, d ..t,
�,1° -x, 'iia• ��-'��
•
Mandi Alford 25FR6Upresentation 10-18-04.ppt M Page 3'1
•
•
r
Man|gfm .DR6§rsnb{o� n1018R4.pp| Page 4 �
�
Mandi Alford - DRB presentation 10-18-04.ppt M p Page 5
•
•
r
I'Mandi Alford- DRB presentation�10-18-04.ppt Page 6
•
•
__ r
fundi Alford - DRB presentation 10-18-04.ppt Page 7
•
"',§' ,.fib'"�: y �n r�a, Y$ ��•� M4,_.x. `�.,�" Ls, .�.. :d,:
•
r
Mandi Alford-DRB presentation 10-18-o4,ppt � M Page 8
•
•
r
_.. _ . m..._ .._ ,�.. __.. ... .. —.
J'NPandi Alford-Di4
eon 10-18-04.pptw _ Page 9
•
�x
•
■
Mandi Alford-,DRB presentation 10-18-04.ppt Page 10
•
• _. . ..
r
Wandi Alford DRB presentation 10-18-0 p Page 11«�
•
.ra.
f
•
r
Mandi Alford-DRB presentation 10-18-04.ppt Page 12
•
WIC OUt Ide S a�
T
!
•
r
tilandi Alford-DRB presentation 10-18-04.ppt Page 13
•
•