Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/14/2003 - Regular Agenda Packet - Design Review Board AGENDA Design Review Board CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS Training Room 1101 Texas Avenue Friday, November 14, 2003 11:00 AM Agenda Item No. 1: Consider absence requests. Richard Benning Dr. Tabb Agenda Item No. 2: Approval of meeting minutes from October 24, 2003 • Agenda Item No. 3: Discussion, consideration and possible action on a site plan for Cavender's Boot City located at 2300 Earl Rudder Freeway South. (03-264 MH) Agenda Item No. 4: Discussion, consideration and possible action on a concept plan for Castlegate Section 5 located north of Greens Prairie Road, west of proposed State Highway 40. (03-280 JR) Agenda Item No. 5: Discussion, consideration and possible action on future agenda items. Agenda Item No. 6: Adjourn. This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretation services must be made before the meeting. To make arrangements call 979-764-3517 or(TDD) 1-800-735-2989. • FROM BENNING PHONE NO. : 409 6946766 Nov. 05 2003 06:03PM P1 • City of`College Station Absence Request Form For Elected and Appointed Officers Name el G4/z �i�.�✓�� Request Submitted on Date: ///Z-/ 3 i I will not be in attendance at the meeting of l/- !4/-_ C,3 for the reason(s) specified: (Date) Signature This request shall be sub»utted to Deborah Grace one weekprior to meeting date. Fax 764-3496. City of College Station, 1101 Texas.Avenue, College Station, Texas 77840 Attn:Deborah Grace • o:eounciV&b9aueq doc Nov 05 03 05; 48p p' 1 • w City of College Station Absence Request Form For Elected and Appointed Officers Name Phillip Tabb Request Submitted on Date: 11/5/03 I will not be in attendance at the meeting of for the reason(s) specified: (Date) JA A 1 � Signature This request shall be submitted to Deborah Grace one week prior to meeting date. Fax 764-3496. City of College Station, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas 77840 Attn: Deborah Grace aoaxriUat�azegdx . r Minutes Design Review Board October 24, 2003 10:30 AM Board Members Present: Scott Shafer, Stanton Ware, Dr. Tabb, Alan King, Richard Benning& Bill Trainor. Board Members Absent: George McLean Staff Present: Staff Assistant Deborah Grace, Staff Planners' Molly Hitchcock&Jennifer Prochazka, Planning Intern Lauren Harrell, Assistant City Engineer Brett McCully, City Planner Jane Kee, Development Review Coordinator Natalie Ruiz, Development Services Director Kelly Templin& Director of Economic Development Kim Foutz. Others Present: John Holleman, Kerri & Daniel Brightwell, Joanne and Darrell Barrington, Dale O'Riley, Morris Hamilton, Randy Klien, Joe Schultz& Bill Lero. AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 Consideration of absence requests. George McLean Dr. Tabb made the motion to approve the request. Mr. Benning seconded the motion, which passed unopposed(6-0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Discussion,consideration and possible action on signs and fagade changes for Mad Hatter's located at 317 University Drive in Northgate. The applicant's proposal is for approximately 28-sq. ft. of signage (20 on the front facade and 8 on the rear). The applicant is also proposed to brick the front fagade. Ms. Hitchcock told the Board the proposed sign does meet the technical requirements and the fagade changes are at the Board's discretion. Mr. Benning commended the applicants for coming to the Board for approval. He stated that there are at least 25 illegal signs in Northgate and he does not understand why the city chooses to ignore them. Mr. Benning asked if there is an indentation once the plywood was removed from the fagade would the sign be placed in that indentation. The applicants replied yes. L Mr. King made the motion to approve the request with the Board's recommendation that the signs be centered, of earth tone colors and be placed in the indentation (if there is one) once the plywood was removed from the facade. Mr. Trainor seconded the motion, which passed unopposed(6-0). Ms. Ruiz told the Board that there have been some changes in the Code Enforcement Office. Several Staff Planner's have rode with Code Enforcement Officers in Northgate and they did identify a lot of signs that are in violation. It will be over the next couple of weeks that staff will be working with the merchants on bringing the signs in compliance. AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Discussion, consideration and possible action on a driveway variance at 5108 Whistling Straits in the Pebble Creek 7-131 Subdivision. A single-family residence at this address was permitted with a single access driveway meeting UDO requirements. During a building inspection, it was noted that a second driveway was added without permit, and the combination appeared-far in excess of the allowable 28-feet. A submittal by the builder, who is the applicant for this variance, shows two 20-foot wide drives. A site inspection by the Development Engineer determined that because the island between the drives did not reach the property line, that the width as measured along the property line was approximately 70-feet. The site inspection yielded no obvious need for the excessive width. The applicant stated that the lot is odd shaped and it has a drop off. The purpose for the • circular drive was to fill in the area and create a retainer wall to protect an oak tree next to the house. Dr. Tabb made the motion to approve a variance by taking off approximately I-%feet of the circular area on the street side and maintaining the 20 feet on the right & left sides. Mr. Benning seconded the motion, which passed(5-1). Mr. King voted against the variance. Mr. King stated that not having a circular drive would be a better solution. AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Discussion, consideration and possible action on a driveway variance at 303 Walton Drive in College Hills Estates Subdivision. The residence at 303 Walton is a rental home that fronts Walton Drive and has an existing driveway onto that street. The rear of the property fronts a public alleyway that is overgrown with mature vegetation. A small section of the rear of the property also fronts directly onto Lincoln, which is designed as a Major Collector. The lot has a detached garage that the owner uses to store personal equipment and property. It is the desire of the owner to construct a second driveway into the rear of the lot to be able to occasionally access the garage without having to move the tenant's from the existing driveway. r At first the applicant requested that the city clear the alley from the vegetation so he could access the rear property consistent with the alley designation. Upon further investigation of the site, it is clear that the vegetation in the alley is serving as a significant buffer between the single-family and the apartments across the alley. The applicant is therefore requesting to have a driveway directly onto Lincoln. Mr. King made the motion to approve the variance with the following limitations: the applicant shall place a gate at the end of the driveway apron, run a fence up to the vegetation in the alley and clear the vegetation close to the road for site distance purposes. Mr. Trainor seconded the motion, which passed unopposed(6-0). AGENDA ITEM NO. S: Discussion, consideration and possible action on a site plan for Cross Street Warehouse Apartments located on a portion of the 400 block of College Main and 400 block of Tauber in the Boyett Addition Subdivision in Northgate. The proposed apartment development will have 43 multi-family dwelling units for a total of 123 bedrooms. There is also a proposed retail space on the ground floor of this development. The proposed site plan shows 36 on-site parking spaces and 4 off-street spaced located on the adjacent property. The property is located on the corner opposite the Northgate parking garage. The garage has a total of 725 parking spaces. Cross Street Warehouse will have an option of leasing up to 70 parking spaces per year in the Northgate garage. Parking spaces are also available for lease by any individual on a monthly basis. This development is required to have one interior interior-parking island, provided somewhere within the interior-parking row. The applicant is requesting a variance to this requirement in order to use this area for an extra parking space. The applicant showed the Board brick and roof color samples. He explained the goal is to make the building look like a warehouse that has been there for 75 years and is being converted into lofts. Mr. King made the motion to approve the site plan with staff recommendations as noted in the staff comments # I and for the approval of the parking variance. Mr. Trainor seconded the motion, which passed unopposed(6-0). Mr. Benning questioned the parking agreement for the 70 parking spaces and requested that the City advise the DRB of the number of parking spaces in the garage that will be available to multi-family developers. He also wanted to know the number so he can decide if we are reserving enough parking spaces for the existing businesses. Ms. Foutz replied that she would have to consult with her Director. • Mr. Shafer asked Ms. Foutz to come back to the next meeting and update the Board on her findings. AGENDA ITEM NO. 6: Discussion, consideration and possible action on a concept plan for Villas of Harvey located off of SH-30 near the intersection of SH-30 and FM-158. The applicant is proposing to construct attached residences on individually platted lots. A decorative main entry with water features from Harvey Road is contingent upon approval of the design by the Army Corps of Engineers. Mr. Templin explained the plan to the Board. Dr. Tabb was concerned about having too much pavement and not enough landscaping to absorb the heat. Mr. Benning made the motion to approve the concept plan as submitted with staff recommendations. Mr. Trainor seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0-1. Dr. Tabb obstained from voting. AGENDA ITEM NO. 7. Adjourn. • APPROVED: Scott Shafer ATTEST: Deborah Grace, Staff Assistant • r . DESIGN REVIEW BOARD WOLF PEN CREEK DESIGN DISTRICT STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Molly Hitchcock Date: November 14, 2003 E-mail: mhitchcock@cstx.gov For CAVENDER'S BOOT CITY (SDSP) — DESIGN DISTRICT REVIEW (PROJ) Location: 2300 East Bypass (comer of Holleman and the southbound frontage road) Applicant: George Warren Item Summary: The applicant is planning to redevelop the old Wolfe Nursery site, expanding the existing building and eventually adding on to create multiple lease spaces. The property is also in the process of being replatted into two lots, which will be viewed as a building plot. The proposed Cavender's site plan on Lot 2-R Block One of the Sutton Place Subdivision may be approved separately from future building additions on Lot 1-R, which will have to return to the DRB for consideration when they are ready for development. Material samples will be available at the meeting. Administrator Recommendations: ■ Staff Review Comments are met. ■ Further consideration be given to building facades and mechanical equipment screening. Issues/items for Review: 1. Exterior lighting 2. Solid waste 3. Relationship of buildings to site 4. Relationship of buildings and site to adjoining area 5. Building design 6. Miscellaneous structures and street hardware 7. Landscaping 8. Signage Attachments: 1. Application 2. Site plan 3. Elevations of all building sides 4. Staff Review Comments • FOR OFFICE U E NLY YLVIft' r CASE NO� "' a DATE SUBMITTED �IIJ—l '0 393 r y 0 DESIGN DISTRICT BUILDING & SIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Design Review Board (Check one) ❑ NG-1 ❑ NG-2 ❑ NG-3 �PC MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Application completed in full. $200.00 Special District Application fee Ten (10) folded copies of facade details (including signage) with dimensions. (for Facades only) ✓ Ten (10) folded copies of sign details with dimensions. (for signs only) Color and material samples. If attached signage is proposed, provide ten (10) copies of a building elevation showing sign placement. Date of Preapplication Conference: NAME OF BUSINESS G, VEO G)EW s B007- CIT>l ADDRESS 30Z AoyiqL 0#4k5 E)P, 6,eEEAjv1L LF', Tje 75-*o Z LEGAL DESCRIPTION L.aT z ) BLaCt� (pr-SUrTo,V PC c6 , _57a8DII/SIOA A093Ac PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY VkC �L PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY k9Tr9l�-. APPLICANT'S INFORMATION: Name Geo)e&E�, kIRP—PE'/(J Street Address 30Z eD YR L D,9,_--5 , City G,e,l=EAJV1 LL�' State T� Zip Code 7,54407- E-Mail ,544DyE-Mail Address IPId I W 1? C 12 PMCt/o7Y-, e p,P7,j Phone Number y%9 —/9. 39 Fax Number 903—415 44- 1ZO? PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name PAUL_ C G MZk-, Street Address 3605595-r `S�". ..S(/lTr= /00 ` City 6,eyAA/I4%1JE9-'F- 5"MrldAlState 7 Zip Code 77802- E-Mail 7802E-Mail Address iac 2*7e&clarkew,yyrc2(hatn, 67orn Phone Number v�2�" g�lo"'�:38'�j'� Fax Number DESIGN-1.130C 7/3/2003 1 of 2 A DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED EXTERIOR CHANGES )=)Qo1yj /J9, 4052 5F rO / 7, t,4lt$0 �tioe6p-S)E U)166 Occorle- 41-OA.)6— SPO-r" -+ W,65-r- 5101F5 COY,�V �?(15VA)a- 5-,qC v�e;- w17-1-4 5--rLJ0Qu ( ,DZYV1T-) , ,90,0 C-900py 4c as ---/eo/v-r w17-1-1 IrW910WAJ 7 /z-,tc-- ,�OOr— , AND/OR 8--' ATTACHED SIGN A) 41 FREESTANDING SIGN Square Footage /:r-7:5 P Square Footage All applications must be reviewed by the Design Review Board. Once a meeting is scheduled, the applicant will be notified of the date and time so that he can be present to discuss the proposal with the Board. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correct. 1611-Y Signature oqOwner, Agent or Applicant Date 0 DESIGN-I.DOC 7/3/2003 2of2 • STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 1 Project: CAVENDER'S BOOT CITY (SDSP) — 03-262 PLANNING 1. On the site plan, please identify the owner(s) of lots 1-R and 2-R, Block One Sutton Place Subdivision, and the zoning of Lot 1-R and 3. 2. Please identify in the Legend the different types of fencing proposed that will screen the mechanical area and dumpster. 3. Please identify all fire lanes necessary to provide adequate fire coverage. 4. Please take note: Signage will be permitted separately. 5. Please call out how tall the concrete block edging wall will be. 6. Provide a general note that all roof and ground-mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from view or isolated so as not to be visible from any public right- of-way or residential district within 150' of the subject lot, measured from a point five feet above grade. Such screening shall be coordinated with the building architecture and scale to maintain a unified appearance. LANDSCAPING/STREETSCAPING/BUFFER 1. Provide a general note that 100% coverage of groundcover, decorative paving, decorative rock, or a perennial grass is required in parking lot islands, swales and • drainage areas, the parking lot setback, rights-of-way, and adjacent property disturbed during construction. 2. In the Plant List (Newly Planted), please identify the minimum individual cane size as 1.25" for the crepe myrtles. 3. In General Note #8, please clarify that the system will be installed and approved before C.O. DESIGN DISTRICT BUILDING AND SIGN REVIEW 1. The freestanding sign proposed on the site plan will have to be reviewed by the DRB before a building permit may be issued. Please provide sign details if the intent is for it to be reviewed at this time. 2. Please provide material samples for signage and architectural details. Reviewed by: Molly Hitchcock Date: October 27, 2003 ENGINEERING 1. Site Plan can not be approved until the Replat has been filed. 2. There is a 20' PUE that is being required on the Replat, which will need to be shown on the Site Plan. 3. Show water and sewer services to the building. 4. The fire lane hammerhead turnaround requires a minimum of 60 feet from the top of • the arm to the end of the lane. Current dimension measures only 50 feet. 5. Show pavement detail. NOTE: Any changes made to the plans,that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and'bubbled"on your plans.Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City,will constitute a completely new review Page 2 of 3 r • 6. Please provide grading information. What are drainage plans? 7. Grading and Erosion Control Plans are required for DP. Reviewed by: Carol Cotter Date: October 29, 2003 ELECTRICAL 1. Developer installs conduit per city specs and design. 2. Developer provides 30' of rigid conduit for riser poles. Developer installs first 10'. City installs remainder. 3. Developer pours transformer pad(s) per city specs and design. 4. Developer installs pull boxes as per city specs and design.(pull boxes provided by the city. 5. Developer provides digital AutoCAD 2002 version of plat and/or site plan. email to rbolin O1..cstx.aov 6. Developer provides load data for project. 7. Developer provides temporary blanket easement for construction purposes. 8. Developer provides easements for electric infrastructure as installed for electric lines. Reviewed by: Ronnie Bolin Date: 10-23-03 MISCELLANEOUS 1. Irrigation system must be protected by either a Pressure Vacuum Breaker, a Reduced Pressure Principle Back Flow Device, or a Double-Check Back Flow Device, and installed as per City Ordinance 2394. 2. All BackFlow devices must be installed and tested upon installation as per City Ordinance 2394. • NOTE: Any changes made to the plans,that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and"bubbled"on your plans.Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City,will constitute a completely new review. Page 3 of 3 v • DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PDD CONCEPT PLAN STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Jennifer Reeves Date: 11-04-03 E-mail: jreeves@cstx.gov For GREENS PRAIRIE INVESTORS (CPDD) (03-00500280) A Concept Plan shall be required prior to any development of property zoned Planned Development District(PDD). or Planned Mixed-Use District(P-MUD). Zoning District: PDD Approved Land Uses: Single family, public and private parks, and open space Location: 32.138 acres north on Greens Prairie Road, west of proposed SH 40 Applicant: Greens Prairie Investors, Ltd. Item Summary: The developer wishes to continue the development as it was originally envisioned and implemented in the previous Sections 1-4 of the Castlegate Subdivision. The Planned Development District is the only available district that provides for the meritorious modifications of the regulations. Allowable building heights are listed from 15 to 35 feet. Requested building setbacks are requested as follows (UDO standards follow in parenthesis): Front: 20' minimum, (25') Side: 7.5' (7.5') Side Street: 15' (15') Rear: 20'for lots > 100' in depth (20') 15'for lots < 100' in depth (20') Minimum lot dimensions for lots that are located adjacent to the floodplain or greenway areas are proposed as follows: Minimum Lot Area: 6000 SF (5000 SF) Minimum Lot Width: 50' at front or rear setback line (50') 35' at street right-of-way Minimum Lot Depth: 87.5' (100') • • - r s • Street pavement width for residential streets are proposed as follows: 24' width for cul-de-sac streets (27') 27' width for other residential streets (27') Parks and Recreation Board Recommendations: The Parks Board has previously approved the Castlegate Master Plan for parkland dedication. Greenways Program Manager Recommendations: The developer has also worked with the Greenways Program Manager to finalize plans for dedicating a 5.3-acre greenway area in another portion of Castlegate. Administrator Recommendations: The administrator recommends approval of the plan as submitted. Review Criteria: 1. The proposal will constitute an environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding area; 2. The proposal is in conformity with the policies, goals, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, and any subsequently adopted Plans, and will be consistent with the intent and purpose of this Section; 3. The proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not adversely affect adjacent development; 4. Every dwelling unit need not front on a public street but shall have access to a public street directly or via a court, walkway, public area, or area owned by a homeowners association; 5. The development includes provision of adequate public improvements, including, but not limited to, parks, schools, and other public facilities; 6. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 7. The development will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use and other uses reasonably anticipated in the area considering existing zoning and land uses in the area. Minimum Requirements: Unless otherwise indicated in the approved Concept Plan, the minimum requirements for this development shall be those stated in the Unified Development Ordinance for R-1 Single Family Residential Attachments: 1. Application 2. Concept Plan 3. Planning &Zoning Minutes from October 16, 2003 • FOR OFFICE 7USE ONLY CASE NO. DATE SUBMITTED 1121 / CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW FOR PDD / P-MUD M PDD-H (Housing) ❑ PDD-I (Industrial) ❑ PDD-B (Business) ❑ P-MUD MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Application completed in full. $200.00 application fee. -� Ten (10) copies of the Concept Plan in accordance with Section 3.4.D of the UDO. -7 Written legal description of subject property (metes &bounds or lot & block of subdivision, whichever is applicable). f✓ Concept Plan Information sheet completed in full. _ Proof that the Greenways Manager has reviewed and approved your conceptual plan. _ Proof that the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board has reviewed and approved your conceptual plan. �r�arklan� �ecilcp ien 'ITii(emf4 hd.� 171&11 kpeo m4. Date of Required Preapplication Conference: APPLICANTS INFORMATION;,-, �T / 11 Name(s) ��e0iaS Crfr'i-8 J. • Street Address City Ce 1 e State -TY Zip CodeS E-Mail Address Phone Number - —77-SD Fax Number x`70 -i0*1 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: /_ Name(s) (�1 "4S 1riG.�- Vtw, T S, �• Street Address D Odsibont D?4✓e City a State -T& — Zip Code E-Mail Address Phone Number ? - 90 -7Z55-0 Fax Number 070 This property was conveyed to owner by deed, dated and recorded in VolumeQ� Page SS of the Brazos County Deed Records. General Location of Property: MrA oP 4rpls&irie Pk, ukw4-ocenpased S Address of Property: hor Legal Description: Robert- 5fe✓en5a1•7 .<11Arre'4 . Total Acreage: 32, /506gc.e_5 Existing Zoning: /F-© Requested Zoning: Present Use of Property: GaD►riIr I"nai • Proposed Use of Property: J 1' �vr, m6zde4�cVl conccht plan rcvicw08/04/03 1 of 4 • I CONCEPT PLAN INFORMATION Purpose and intent of proposed development, as approved by the City Council as part of the PDD zoning: List and explanation of the land uses approved by the City Council as part of the PDD zoning: �n i i�e�t�' l SC�evno2n�ntCe�, Cc ►d�pareas . `A1 recti bels, ha is re angeof uu rue building 1, aheights: LS' 3S Please provide a general statement regarding the proposed drainage: A S-*rm Sew ei- 5a54em KA4 be cai5,*ur4rJ :& rangy/ Ae erai6lc a.✓rd 41::& �a�� -Ir r�r►o�G� ;✓oto a �r;b►�fary r, Cast ►a eVdI I/ beep con ofmade i ' �Wleh`' 'o-rsas a M JCA List the g ne al u k or d mens on ariatio s sought: S�-p rxtyP�i tf H,, l-�SrebdeC-kr 2"J t�stalev��i'a,� Sfi^.ee,l'S �,lk. re�uirernPn�s �r �PG�Ur' �Y��Py►�� �'�.2.�5. bu,� i na �1c / n e c�c'sfa 5, �yi,(J n i i y m 161 A't fdimem 0' "5 tak �iDece LDYKn=�Ql loy, A 1A 7a arm ("—w atdiaGenf A At acn fit--1w4m areas a,&ad Urlvv tPd DH-5�-ee-� vas k-f�g I,c. rem If variations are sought, please provide a list of community benefits and /or innovative design concepts to rt ' r justify the request: Sem (rl (ic�ec� JuS�= �r���6�„ �r 1nU� �vr«�S �dJtcc_T1._j �o C-'• kl SA-6,ACJ 5,1 (Please note that a "complete site plan" must be submitted to Development Services for a formal review after the "conceptual" plan has been approved by the Design Review Board prior to the issuance of a building permit-except for single-family development) The applicant has prepared this application and supporting information and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correct. IF APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A POWER OF ATTORNEY STATEMENT FROM THE OWNER. • ��. l0/2�/03 Signature of owner or aplollicant Date I =gra t MINUTES Planning and Zoning Commission • CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1101 Texas Avenue October 16, 2003 7:00 P.M. 7. Public hearing, discussion and possible action on a Rezoning for Castlegate Section 5 from A-O Agricultural Open to PDD Planned Development District consisting of 32.138 acres of the Robert Stevenson Survey A-54, generally located north of Greens Prairie Road, west of proposed State Highway 40. (03-177) Staff Planner Reeves explained that the PD District is the only available district that provides for the meritorious modifications of the regulations that allow for the developer to continue the development as it was originally envisioned and implemented in the previous Sections 1-4 of the Castlegate Subdivision. Ms. Reeves stated that Staff recommends approval of the zone change with the condition that the flood plain portion of the property be used for the H.O.A. and not developed. The proposed single family housing is in compliance with the Land Use Plan which shows the subject area as medium density single family residential with a corresponding density of 3-6 dwelling units • per acre. In closing, Ms. Reeves stated that the proposed concept plan is going before the Design Review Board(DRB)for approval of design standards. Chairman Shafer opened the public hearing. The Castlegate developer, Wallace Phillips, spoke in favor of the rezoning. Chairman Shafer closed the public hearing. Commissioner Trapani motioned to approve the rezoning with Staff Comments as stated. Commissioner Williams seconded the motion. The motion carried 7-0. FOR: Shafer, Trapani, Williams, White, Hall, Reynolds and Davis. AGAINST: None. • P&Z Minutes October 16,2003 Page 1 of 1