Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/18/1980 - Regular Minutes - Zoning Board of Adjustments• MTNUTES City of College Station Zoning Board of Adjustment March 18, 1980 Members Present: Chairman Harper, Upham, Daughtey, Mathewson, Wagner,Counci1 Liason Boughton Members Absent: Burke Staff Members Present: Zoning Official Callaway, Planning Assistant Longley Agenda Item No. 1 -Approval of Minutes Meetings of November 20, 1979 and February 20, 1980. Upham moved to approve the minutes of November 20, 1979 with the correction of the spelling of Bill Youngkin wherever it occurred within the minutes. The • motion was seconded by Wagner and passed unanimously. Harper moved to approve the minutes of February 19, 1980. The motion was seconded by Wagner and passed by the following vote: For: Harper, Boughton, Wagner, Daughtey Opposed: None Mathewson abstained due to his absence on February 19. Agenda Item No. 2 - Consideration of an Appeal of a Decision of the Zoning Official in the name of Paul W. Conrad. Callaway explained the case before the Board as being an appeal of the deter- mination of his office to apply Section 6-M.1.(e), Ordinance No. 850 to include a proposed clock-tower sign with chimes. Callaway pointed out that the proposed location, Texas Avenue at Dominik Drive, was near a neighborhood from which complaints about noise from the adjacent commercial area have been received. Conrad explained his proposed sign installation to the Board. After playing a recording of the Westminister Chimes to be utilized in the proposed sign, Conrad stated that the chimes would be played on the hour and half-hour and that the hours of operation of the chimes could be regulated. He further stated that the chime operation would probably be timed to correspond with the • business hours of the adjacent shopping center. Upham asked how the bells could be heard at the south end of the shopping center, one half mile from the sign, and not be heard in the residential area 300 feet from the sign . Minutes • March 18 , 1980 Page 2 Conrad replied that the speakers utilized were directional speakers. Ka theleen Kenefick pointed out that the prevailing winds in this area would carry sound from the sign .towards the residential area. Conrad replied that the volume Leval of the chimes were adjustable and could be lowered when necessary. Upham asked if the amplifier system could be utilized to play tapes and as a public address system. Conrad replied that the system could only play pre-recorded carillion music only available from his firm. He followed his reply by p1-eying a tape of the music that was available. Mathewson asked if this option was available to the bank (the proposed user of the sign). Conrad replied that it was. Harper asked if there were any comments from the audience. Katheleen Kenefick stated that the chimes could possibly disturb a small child. • Elsie Lynch stated that the chimes would constitute just one more noise factor which the neighborhood did not need or want. Mathewson asked if a time limit on the hours of operation of the chimes would offset any problems. Upham stated that any favorable action would probable include some such time limit. Authur Bright stated that he had no objections to the chimes, but that he was concerned. by any deviation from the ordinance. Elsie Lynch said that each thing added in the area had depreciated the value of their property. Upham stated a concern for any precedent that might be established by a favorable action, Harper stated a concern for protecting the residential area along Kyle Street. Mathewson moved to override the Zoning Officials denial of the construction of a bell tower wfith chimes at the new bank, located at the intersection of Texas Avenue and Dominik, with the following conditions: • A, The hours of operation of the chimes are from 9:00 a.m, to 8:00 p,m, ; B. The speakers oriented towards the residential area along Kyle shall not be installed; C. The chime music not exceed sixty minutes of any twenty-four hour period. Minutes • March 18 , 1980 Page 3 Wagner seconded the motion, which failed by the following vote (four votes being necessary for favorable action): For: Mathewson Opposed: Harper, Wagner, Upham, Daughtey Agenda Item No. 3 - Other Business. Callaway discussed the problem of not being able to issue building permits for residential construction, remodeling, etc, when there was a non-conforming structure on the lot. Following a discussion of this problem by the Board, the Board moved to adopt the policy of giving the Zoning Official discretion in approving building permits for modification to the primary habitable structure so long as that structure itself is not in non-conformance, and the non-conformance is due to some ansilur or accessory structure. There being no opposition, the policy was adopted by commom consent. Agenda Item No. 4 - Adjourn. • There being no further business the meeting was adjourned. •