HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/11/1999 - Regular Agenda - Parks Board3 t
E+CRE TI
`MEE1
1. Approval of Minutes from April 13, 1999
2. Hear Visitors
3. Discussion and Resolution of support for Texas Parks and Wildlife trails grant
application
4. Discussion of proposed FY00 surcharge fees
5. Status report and discussion of Kids Klub program
6. Discussion of Greenways Report — from Public Hearing on April 29, 1999
7. Discussion of Parks Master Plan
8. Discussion of Parks and Playground Safety
9. Discussion of additional lights at A&M Consolidated High School tennis courts
10. Discussion of Richard Carter Park landscape volunteer program
11. Wolf Pen Creek update
12. Items:
Capital Improvement Report
Discussion of next meeting date and agenda
13. Adjourn
The building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available.
Any request for sign interpretive services must be made 48 hours before the meeting.
To make arrangements call (409) 764-3517 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. Agendas
posted on Internet Website http;_a_w i_ wile _$_tati.on_,tx. us. and Cable Access
Channel 19.
o:board/may99.doc
Staff Present: Steve Beachy, Director of Parks and Recreation; Eric Ploeger,
Assistant Director; Linda Waltman, Recreation Superintendent; Curtis
Bingham, Operations Superintendent; Jana Wood, Kids Klub
Supervisor; Kris Startzman, Board Secretary.
Board Members Present: Chris Barzilla, Chairman; Glen Davis; John Crompton;
Susan Allen; John Nichols; George Dresser; Sarah
Birkhold.
Guest: Dr. Scott Schaeffer, Department of Recreation, Park and Tourism Sciences,
Texas A&M University.
The meeting was called to order at 6:50 p.m.
1. Approval of Minutes from April 13, 1999 - Glen Davis made a motion to table
the minutes and move the item to the next Board meeting. The motion was
seconded by John Nichols. The motion passed 7-0.
2. Hear Visitors - There were no visitors.
3. Discussion and Resolution of support for Texas Parks and Wildlife trails
grant application - Steve Beachy said that this is an opportunity that is
available through the Texas Parks & Wildlife Department. There is a grant
application that is currently available with a deadline of June 1st. This grant is
related to two trails, and the construction and development of trails that is
separate from the grants that are filed for the development of parks. He went on
to say that this is a 4-1 match, up to $100,000. The Department feels that Lick
Creek Park would be most appropriate for this type of grant. When the bond
issue was passed for Lick Creek Park, there was $400,000 in there. There was
about $800,000 projected to develop the park, with the understanding that the
Department would try to get matching grants. He said that Dr. Scott Schaeffer
from the Department of Recreation, Park and Tourism Sciences agreed to work
on this as a class project. Scott divided his class up into teams and let them
look at the Lick Creek Park Master Plan to develop different scenarios for parks
grants. Steve urged the Board to chose the best approach, and pending the
Regular Meeting
May 11, 1999
Page 1
approval of the Parks Board, submit it to Parks and Wildlife. Dr. Schaeffer laid
out two maps and discussed different approaches to recreational trails. The first
approach would include three different zones: The first zone - no use; the
second - mufti -purpose use (including equestrian); and the third - conservation
and education with foot -only traffic. The student estimates ran about $111,000
total, $90,000+ of which would come from federal funds. One concern was
voiced about whether bikes would be allowed. The second approach was to
have two loops with connectors between the two. One loop would be for multiple
use, including horses, bicycles and pedestrians. The second loop would be for
education and conservation, with foot traffic only. Potentially, it would include
four bridges. The estimate for the total of the second approach ran about
$85,000 to $122,000, around $97,000 of which would be from federal funds.
This proposal was the more expensive, because it included four bridges,
whereas the first had only one. Steve said that he prefers the second plan
because it is easier to adapt to present circumstances. John Crompton made a
motion to submit a grant application to construct bridges as the first priority, and
then include as many other priorities as can be fitted into $100,000. George
Dresser seconded the motion. The Board was in favor and the motion passed
7-0.
4. Discussion of proposed FY2000 surcharge fees - Steve said that this item
was brought back from the last meeting. He said that last year, the Board
passed a motion that would apply a 25 percent surcharge to adult softball fees,
to become effective in fiscal year 2000. Glen Davis asked if the Board could
make the $5 surcharge fee uniform, across the board. John C. explained that
this is what was discussed during the last user fees meeting (see Athletic
Renovation and Improvement Funds policy statement draft). (In this draft, it was
suggested charging $5 per person, per team). Glen asked the $5 fee would
apply to both youths and adults. Linda Waltman said it would include Little
League, Youth Soccer, Swim Team, and anyone that uses a City facility.
John C. made a motion to collect $75 per team for softball, soccer and flag
football, excluding special tournaments. He moved for approval of the draft, and
forwarding it to City Council with recommendations. John N. seconded the
motion. The Board was in favor and the motion passed 7-0. Steve said that the
Department will include this as part of its budget submittal.
5. Status report and discussion of Kids Klub program - Steve said that this
was a question that came up during the last Board meeting and it was asked that
the Department give a status report. Two items that were discussed were the
levels of support for those children that are receiving subsidies from our
Community Development Program and the Enrichment Program (Kids Klub), and
what is done in those areas. Jana Wood, the program administrator for Kids
Klub, described the enrichment program as a joint project between the College
Station School District and the Parks Department. The Parks Department is
responsible for the administration of the program, the hiring, the training of the
Regular Meeting
May 11, 1999
Page 2
staff, and the development of the curriculum. The School District is responsible
for the maintenance of the financial end. Jana talked about the Kids Klub
Enrichment Program. She mentioned that there are approximately 720 children
enrolled in the program, with approximately 120 of them on reduced tuition. Kids
Klub is self supporting and it operates mainly off of parent tuition fees. She went
on to say that no one participates in the program for free. This year, regular
tuition is $75/month. Reduced tuition participants pay $20-$40/month. Jana
discussed a typical day at Kids Klub. John C. asked about the evaluation report
that came out a few years ago. He said that one of the concerns was that the
program was not reaching all of those underprivileged families of the community
that we should be. He said that in the last few years, there has been substantial
growth to the program. He asked Jana if that growth in the program reflects
success in reaching more of the underprivileged children, or is there still a
problem? She said that right now the program is doing okay, but some of the
problems that they are facing in the future are inflation, rising costs of salaries
for staff and equipment, and the possible necessity of reducing the ratio between
staff and children. Community Development funds were discussed as a source
of funding, but it was pointed out that they are not a permanent source of cash,
but only "seed money". John C. made a motion that the Parks Board
recommend to the City Council that they provide supplemental funding to
support each of those children in the Kids Klub (Enrichment Program) who are
on reduced tuition. Chris Barzilla added that since the School District also
benefits from the program, the School Board should also be petitioned. George
Dresser seconded the motion. The Board was in favor and the motion passed
7-0.
6. Discussion of Greenways Report — from Public Hearing on April 29, 1999 -
Steve said that this did pass and it will go to the City Council for their approval.
John N. made a motion to adopt the minutes as they were distributed. George
D. seconded the motion. The motion passed 7-0.
7. Discussion of Parks Master Plan - Steve said that good progress is being
made on the proposed plan. He went on to say that a draft of the plan will be put
together and sent out to all of the Board members in ample time for them to
review it before the Special Board meeting on May 25th. He went on to say that
he spoke with a representative from Texas Parks and Wildlife to let the
Department know that a copy of the plan will be submitted to them for
preliminary review. He said that after the Board reviews the plan, at least one
public hearing will be held and then it will be submitted to the City Council for
consideration. The public hearing will be held on June 8th with the Board's
regular meeting. This will be held in the Council Chambers at City Hall.
Regular Meeting
May 11, 1999
Page 3
8. Discussion of Parks and Playground Safety - Steve said that this item comes
from a student report done at Texas A&M that identified some deficient
playgrounds. Steve said that the Department had some key staff members go
through a Certified Playground Inspectors course that is administered by the
National Recreation and Parks Association. He went on to say that three people
on staff have passed the course. Curtis Bingham talked about the playgrounds
that he inspected, which are mainly the wood structure playgrounds. He pointed
out that some deficiencies noted were manufacturing deficiencies that the
Department had no control over. Some deficiencies Parks can take care of,
such as separating children swings from infant swings, and making sure that tire
swings have enough space between them. He mentioned that some of the main
playground units that he looked at were Merry Oaks and Lions Park, Georgie K.
Fitch, Brothers, Raintree, Lemontree and Gabbard Park. A lot of these units are
going to be addressed by CIP (Capital Improvement Program) and are
scheduled to be changed out by the end of 2001. John C. mentioned that he
wanted to make sure that by 2001 Parks is in total compliance with the
Consumer Product Safety Standards. Curtis said that they do give a
reasonable amount of time to bring all play units up to standard. John C. asked
about the $50,000 replacement fund. Curtis said that this was a one-time
$50,000, approved by the City Council to repair or replace things like playground
equipment. The Department is hoping that this will become a permanent fund.
Eric Ploeger thinks that the Department is in pretty good shape, as long as this
fund continues. There was some discussion regarding how much full
compliance with standards would protect the City against future lawsuits. It was
pointed out that even total compliance doesn't completely protect the City, but
that the courts do refer to the standards when considering lawsuits. These
safety standards are not the law, but recommendations and guidelines to make
play structures safer.
9. Discussion of additional lights at ABM Consolidated High School tennis
courts - Steve B. said that he did not have much information on this item.
Currently, there are nine tennis courts at the high school, three of them are lit.
He mentioned that some of the courts looked as if they were designed for adding
lights later, but he did not have cost estimates on adding additional lights at this
time. Chris B. pointed out that he feels that the City needs additional tennis
courts, which could be remedied by working with the School District. George D.
asked if the courts could be used by the public, when they are not being used by
the school — this would give the City additional courts to use — and asked if this
was something that could be discussed with the School District. Chris B. would
like to get a feel of what it would cost to add lights to these courts, and take the
cost to the City Council for approval. Steve B. will follow up with this and put on
a later agenda.
10. Discussion of Richard Carter Park Landscape Volunteer Program - Steve B.
said he did not have much information on this item. He is meeting with students
Regular Meeting
May 11, 1999
Page 4
who started work on this project a couple of months ago. They are using
Richard Carter Park as one of their project sites. Steve will have more
information on this for the next meeting.
11. Wolf Pen Creek Update - Steve B. said that Parks has begun working with the
Public Works Department, trying to figure out what to do with the old lake area.
They have cut a drainage ditch around the current overflow area so that the City
can start working on the creek bottom area. He said that the ditch did draw the
water down, and at this point, they have accomplished what they were trying to
do, but there is still some water around the amphitheater that they haven't been
able to drain. He said that signs have been put up, stating what is being done,
why it is being done, and when it is being done. The Public Works Department
will follow up with news releases. There is a phone number available in case the
public has questions. The work is being done in-house.
12. Consent Items:
— Capital Improvement Report -
John C. asked Steve B. if he had a status report on the meeting with Gary
Seaback. Steve said he has met with Mr. Seaback. Mr. Seaback had voiced
some concerns, but that he was generally favorable to what the Department
wanted to do. John C. asked what would happen next. Steve said that Parks
will have staff meetings with Public Works, Public Utilities and Development
Services and then go to the City Council this month to request permission to
begin negotiations with Mr. Seaback. He mentioned that at this time, price has
not been discussed - the Department will also request permission to secure
appraisals.
Madeley Park - Chris B. wanted to know the Board's position on the
purchase of this land, so that the Board can go to City Council and ask their
permission to acquire the property. Steve said that the reason the Board visited
the site (before the Board meeting) was to determine if the Board wanted to
pursue the acquisition of this property, or if they had any reservations. Steve
asked: if the owner doesn't want to sell the property, does the Board want to go
as far as condemnation? Eric Ploeger said that he thinks that Shabeer Jaffar
(the owner) is interested in selling, but agreeing on a price might be difficult. He
went on to say that condemnation is always the last resort. Steve B. said that
any decision would have to go to the City Council for approval. George D.
made a motion to proceed with steps for acquisition, short of condemnation. The
motion was seconded by John N. The Board was in favor and the motion
passed 7-0.
Discussion of next meeting date and agenda -
® John C. would like to see the archeological study of Lick Creek Park put on
the next agenda.
Regular Meeting
May 11, 1999
Page 5
13. Adjourn - John N. moved to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Chris B.
The Board was in favor and the motion passed 7-0. The meeting was adjourned
at 9:27 p.m.
Approved:
Attest:
Regular Meeting
May 11, 1999
Chris Barzilla, Chair
Date
Kris Startzman
Date
Page 6
Staff Present: Steve Beachy, Director of Parks & Recreation; Eric Ploeger, Assistant
Director; Peter Vanecek, Senior Parks Planner; Kris Startzman, Board
Secretary.
Board Members Present: Chris Barzilla, Chair; John Crompton; Sarah Birkhold; John
Nichols; Susan Allen; Glen Davis.
Members Absent: George Dresser, Co -Chair.
1. Call to Order: The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m.
2. Hear Visitors: There were no visitors at the meeting.
3. Discussion of and possible action on the proposed Recreation, Park, and Open
Space Master Plan: Steve Beachy said that the Staff has tried to incorporate all of the
changes into the plan from the last subcommittee meeting. He mentioned that the
Master Plan will be a working document. He went over the implementation schedule
for the plan and said the Board would make the determination whether the plan should
be amended again or sent directly for public review. After changes are made, the
Department will advertise for the Public Hearing in the newspaper and on cable
television. He went on to say that the plan will be available for public review at the
College Station Library, the Parks Department, and the Development Services
Department.
Some general discussion included:
o Making subheadings to the Table of Contents.
• Putting page and section numbers in parenthesis after references for maps, figures
and tables.
® Executive Summary [list priorities from Section VII (Prioritization of Needs)].
® Section I - Location Map of College Station [adding Madisonville].
• Section I - Location Map of Veterans Park and Athletic Complex [taking out the
word "Map"].
® Section I, Page 13, - "Programs" [changing wording from "Effective Fiscal Year
2000, the Department is proposing a surcharge on athletic team fees," to "Effective
Fiscal Year 2000, the Department is proposing a surcharge on all athletic team fees
(excluding basketball and volleyball)"].
® Section II [making sure that Specific Goals were consistent with the ranking order
for the Department's annual goals].
® Section IV, Table 4 [adding a bold line at the bottom of the table, separating Total
Park Acres (Developed and Undeveloped) from the rest of the table].
® Section VI, Table 11 [adding soccer participation numbers to the table].
® Section VII, Appendix 1 - `Improvement Program Schedule Approved and Funded
Projects' [adding "not prioritized" in parenthesis after the title].
® Section VII, Appendix 5 - 'City of College Station Parks & Recreation Board
Annual Goals 99/00' [prioritize the Department annual goals]. A suggestion was
made to take out the descriptions of the goals and make the goals bold with roman
numerals.
John Nichols moved that after Staff makes the changes to the plan discussed, it be forwarded
to Texas Parks and Wildlife and made available for public review and consideration. Susan
Allen seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion passed 6-0.
4. The meeting adjourned at 8:10 p.m.
** For reference to these minutes, please see the City of College Station Recreation, Park,
and Open Space Master Plan.
Billie Madeley Park'
University Dr,
Madeley Park Location map
Athletic Renovation and Improvement Funds
The CIP Committee recommended multiple lighting, irrigation, shade structures,
pathway and backstop projects on athletic fields as part of the 1998 bond program
that was approved by the City Council and the citizens. They were assured that this
would restore all athletic fields to the City's desirable standard.
However, the CIP Committee noted that it was unreasonable to fund these short-
term projects which had an expected life of considerably less than 25 years with 25
year bonds, since future taxpayers would be paying for assets that no longer existed.
The Council concurred with the Committee's strong recommendation that a
surcharge should be required of all teams using athletic fields to pay for the
replacement of items that have deteriorated as a result of their use, and for any
improvements in the existing standard of facilities they would like to have.
In response to this mandate, the Parks and Recreation Department is preparing a
rolling 10 year schedule which projects the renovations and improvements required
at each athletic field complex. Input from representatives of the athletic field users
will be solicited in preparing this schedule. The costs of implementing the 10 year
program will be calculated, with allowances made for likely future cost increases,
and divided into equal annual amounts.
The surcharge will be sufficient to pay each user groups' prorated share of the fields'
annual renovations and improvements. This money will be retained in a separate
capital fund for each athletic field complex, and will be used exclusively for
renovating or improving that complex. The Parks and Recreation Department will
consult with representatives from the athletic groups contributing to a fund before
money can be appropriated from it.
It is likely to take some months for the staff to carefully develop and cost the 10 year
plans. However, it is desirable to implement the program as soon as possible, since
delays will increase the surcharge amounts that will be needed in future years. This
policy will be implemented on October 1,1999 at the commencement of FY2000.
In lieu of the availability of the 10 years plan, the Parks and Recreation Board
recommended a surcharge be leveled on each item that equates to approximately $5
per person, per team in FY2000. This will be reviewed with athletic team
representatives before the FY2001 budget cycle when the rolling 10 year plan is
available, and revisions, if necessary, will be made to this $5 amount to reflect the
financial needs of the fields. This procedure will be replicated annually in future
years.
o:/group/board/subcom/fees/athletic
Kris Startzman - Parks Board Info ::::: :::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::
.Page
From: Jana Wood
To: KSTARTZMAN
Date: 5/5/99 10:30AM
Subject: Parks Board Info
Per Steve's request I am sending you this information pertaining to Kids Klub tuition.
Regular tuition for Kids Klub is $75.00 per month. Participants that qualify for free lunch pay $20.00 per
month and reduced lunch participants pay $40.00. Below is a list of the number of participants in each
reduced category 1997-98 and 1998-99.
1997 -1998
Free - 75
Reduced - 16
Total - 91
1998 - 1999
Free - 98
Reduced - 29
Total - 127
Because Kids Klub is a self supporting enterprise, and we have such a large number of reduced tuition
participants, we have requested funding from Community Development through the Block Grant
program. This year we are requesting $46,504. This is considerably more than we have requested in
the past ($19,000 and $24,000). However, our enrollment, fees, costs, etc are increasing. The figure of
$46,504 is the difference between what reduced participants are paying and the regular tuition fee.
am meeting with Gary Balmain, Grant Coordinator, this Friday, May 7, to discuss reducing the amount
of the request. The request goes to Council on May 13.
SUBSTANDARD PLAY STRUCTURES
Several play units were inspected as to how they meet the U. S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission (CPSC) guidelines. The play units that were inspected were mostly the older
15 to 20 year old play structures made of wood and found in the following parks: Merry
Oaks Park, Lions Park, Georgie K. Fitch Park, Brothers Pond Park, Raintree Park,
Lemontree Park and Gabbard Park. All these play units were substandard in similar areas.
The metal play unit in Lions Park is an example of a newer play unit (1994) that also does
not meet CPSC standards. The comments pertaining to the play units only address the
areas that would take a considerable amount of money to correct. None of the play units
specified use for any particular age group. The wood structure at Thomas Park Pool was
not included in this list due to the fact that it is presently in the process of being replaced.
Merry Oaks Park (wood structure)
Concrete containment for pea gravel does not meet 6 ft. fall zone requirement.
Fall zone for swings does not meet the 2 x height requirement.
Swings should be separate from play structure.
Wood decking is within the 6 ft. fall zone.
Play unit contains areas of catch points and head entrapment.
Lions Park (wood structure)
Play unit contains areas of catch points and head entrapment.
Obstacles are within the 6 ft. fall zone requirement.
Fall surface is compacted.
Tire swing does not meet the 6 ft. fall zone requirement and should be separate
from play unit and does not meet distance requirements between tire swing and
supports.
Free standing slide does not meet the 6 ft. fall zone requirement.
Toy digging equipment has protrusions and pinch points.
(metal structure)
The concrete borders for pea gravel does not meet the 6 ft. fall zone requirement.
The swings should be separate from the play unit, do not meet the 2 x height fall
zone requirement and does not meet the distance requirements between the swings
and between the swings and supports.
Play unit has head entrapment areas at the top of stairs and at the top of the bar
climber.
Fall surface is compacted.
Georgie K. Fitch Park (wood structure)
- Fall surface is compacted.
- Play unit contains areas of catch points and head entrapment.
Concrete border for pea gravel does not meet 6 ft. fall zone requirements.
Tire swing should be separate from play unit and does not meet the distance
requirement between the tire swing and supports.
Brothers Pond Park (wood structure)
Swings should be separate from play unit and do not meet the distance
requirements between swings and between swings and supports.
Concrete border for pea gravel does not meet 6 ft. fall zone requirement.
- Play unit contains areas of catch points and head entrapment.
Insufficient pea gravel depth for fall zone.
Raintree Park (wood structure)
Fall surface is compacted.
Swings should be separate from play unit and do not meet the distance
requirements between swings and between swings and supports.
Concrete border for pea gravel does not meet the 6 ft. fall zone requirement.
Play unit contains areas of catch points and head entrapment.
Tire swing should be separate from play unit and does not meet distance
requirement between the tire swing and supports.
Lemontree Park (wood structure)
- Fall surface is compacted.
Swings should be separate from play unit and do not meet the distance
requirements between swings and between swings and supports.
Play unit contains areas of catch points and head entrapment.
Concrete border for pea gravel does not meet the 6 ft. fall zone requirement.
Gabbard Park (wood structure)
Insufficient pea gravel depth for fall zone.
Swings should be separate from play unit and do not meet the distance
requirements between swings and between swings and supports and do not meet
the 2 x height fall zone requirement.
- Concrete border for pea gravel does not meet the 6 ft. fall zone requirement.
Play unit contains areas of catch points and head entrapment.
Tire swing should be separate from the play unit and does not meet distance
requirement between tire swing and supports.
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
MAY, 1999
1. TEEN CENTER
Project Number:
Budget:
Contract Amount:
Project Manager:
Project Design:
Comments/Status:
recommendation was
PK9807
$400,000
$358,200
Eric Ploeger
Patterson Architects
Qualification statements were opened February 4, 1998. A staff
sent to Council, for selection of an architect, on the February 26,
1998, Council meeting. Council accepted the recommendation of Patterson Architects of
Bryan. Preliminary design was discussed at the June Parks & Recreation Board meeting.
The plan was presented to Council on July 9, 1998, and staff was directed to review the
plans with the Teen Advisory Board and report back to Council. The Council approved the
recommendation of the Teen Advisory Board to add funding to the project during the August
27, City Council meeting. The project was bid on January 7. Bids were opened January
22, 1999, and Marek Brothers Construction, Inc., was the low bidder. The slab for the
building was pored on April 7, 1999.
Task: Project Design:
Advertisement & Award:
Complete:
2. MADELEY PARK/LAND ACQUISITION
Project Number:
Budget:
Contract Amount:
Project Manager:
Project Design:
CD 1230
$ 150,000
N/A
Eric Ploeger
In -House
March - November 1998
January 1999
August 1999
Comments/Status: An appraisal has been completed on the Jaffar property. A title
report has been ordered and an offer will be made based on the appraisal. The project is
now on hold pending further review by the Parks Board. A Parks Board Tour is planned
for May 11, 1999.
Task: Project Design:
Advertisement & Award:
Complete:
CIP Report
o:board/cip/cip.doc
4-May-99 Page 1 of 3
3. WPC LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
Project Number:
Budget:
Contract Amount:
Project Manager:
Project Design:
PK9505
N/A
N/A
Peter Vanecek
In-house
Comments/Status: Improvements for the northwest corner of the Dartmouth/Holleman
intersection. Development of a flowerbed, sign, and handrail improvements to compliment
the existing development on the southeast comer. This project was reviewed by the WPC
Oversight Committee on January 11, 1999. The Committee recommended that the
project be reviewed by McClure Engineering who is contracted to conduct the drainage
engineering in the corridor. After review, it has been decided to delay this project until
McClure Engineering can complete its conceptual design of the corridor. A second
project to construct a small bridge and trail between the Kona Steak House and Johnny
Corinas on Hwy. 30 is currently being designed by the Parks Planning staff.
Task: Project Design:
Advertisement & Award:
Complete:
4. ATHLETIC PARK MASTER PLAN
Project Number:
Budget:
Contract Amount:
Project Manager:
Project Design:
Comments/Status: A meeting with leaders of the soccer community was held in
October. This was to discuss needs and ideas to begin master plan development by the
planning staff. A similar meeting with experienced members of the softball community was
held. Concepts will be developed for public hearings and Parks and Recreation Board.
discussions. This project is on hold until the Parks Master Plan is completed.
Task: Project Design:
Advertisement & Award:
Complete:
5. ADAMSON POOL RENOVATION
Project Number: N/A
Budget: $ 65,000
Design Contract Amount: $51,100
Project Manager: Eric Ploeger
Project Design: Waterscape Consultants
CIP Report
o:board/cip/cip.doc
4-May-99 Page 2 of 3
Comments/Status: Waterscape Consultants completed a conditions report on the
condition of Adamson Pool along with recommendations for renovations in May '98. Funds
for renovation design were budgeted in the FY98-99 budget. The design contract was
approved by the City Council on December 10, 1998. The design process began in
January, 1999. Budget numbers are expected by May, 1999 for the upcoming budget
process.
Task: Project Design: January - June 1999
Advertisement & Award: August - October 1999
Complete: May 2000
6. EDELWEISS PARK MASTER PLAN
Project Number: PK9910
Budget: $ 213,000 Parkland Dedication and 1998 Bond Funds
Contract Amount: N/A
Project Manager: Peter Vanecek
Project Design: In-house
Comments/Status: The first public hearing in the design process was held October 19,
1998. The second was held December 8, 1998. The final was held on January 12, 1999.
Approval of the site plan will be requested of council during the February 11, 1999 council
meeting. The project bids were be opened on April 23, 1999 and a recommendation
forwarded to Council for the May 13, City Council Meeting.
Task: Project Design: October - March 1999
Advertisement & Award: April 1999
Complete: October 1999
7. WEST DISTRICT MAINTENANCE SHOP
Project Number: PK9927
Budget: $481,000
Design Contract Amount:
Project Manager: Eric Ploeger
Project Design: Holster and Associates
Comments/Status: Request For Qualifications (RFQs) for an architect have been received
and a selection was referred to the City Council during the February 11, 1999 council
meeting. Holster and Associates was selected to complete the design. The conceptual
design is nearing completion.
Task: Project Design: March - June 1999
Advertisement & Award: July 1999
Complete: January 2000
CIP Report
o:board/cip/cip.doc
4-May-99 Page 3 of 3
Items of Interest
May, 1999
Brazos Valley Bluegrass Music Festival
The International Bluegrass Music Association has designated May as "Worldwide
Bluegrass Music Month". In the Lone Star State and around the world, bluegrass
musicians will organize festivals and stage inpromptu performances in this celebration.
Governor George W. Bush has proclaimed May 1999 as Bluegrass Music Month in
Texas, and has urged suitable recognition. Appropriately, the College Station Parks
and Recreation Department will be hosting the Brazos Valley Bluegrass Music Festival
on Saturday, June 5th, 1999. The Festivities will take place at College Stations
Central Park from 12 noon to 10 PM. Admission is free. The Festival is being
produced by Rodney O'Connor with Promotional Entertainment Concepts. Mr.
O'Connor has an extensive background and interest in Bluegrass music. The bands
being featured at the festival are Cedar Creek (Bryan, TX), Brazos County Grass
(Bryan, TX), Red Eye (Austin, TX), Saltgrass (Brazoria, TX), Possum Ridge (Hubbard,
TX), and Pine Island Station (Waller, TX). In addition to the Bluegrass Music there will
be arts and craft booths and many free children's activities. The Festival will go on rain
or shine. Everyone is encouraged to bring their own lawn chairs and picnic baskets.
May is Older American's Month
May 6th at 10AM at the Lincoln Center - Seniors group will be able to utilize the
computer lab at the Lincoln Center while the children are not at the center
May 13th - City Council Meeting, proclamation of May 26th as "National Senior
Health and Fitness Day"
May 18th from 6PM-7:30PM - College Station celebrates seniors with an ice cream
social at the Central Park Pavilion. Entertainment is planned
May 26th from 9AM - 12:30PM at Post Oak Mall - National Senior Health and Fitness
Day. There will be information booths on health and fitness along with entertainment
and audience participation in exercise
College Station Little League
P. O. Box 9041
College Station/ Texas 77842
April 26, 1999
Mayor Lynn Mcflhaney
City of College Station
P. O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Dear Mayor Mcflhaney:
With the unanimous approval by the College Station City Council on April 22, 1999 to sell municipal
bonds for the Parks and Recreation Department to begin future planning in the new Veterans and
community parks, College Station Little League requests input into future youth athletic facilities.
With continued growth of College Station over the next five to ten years, the existing facilities will
be overcrowded. Today, we schedule 900+ games over an approximate 60 day period for College
Station youth to participate in the Little League program. We would like to request two or three Little
League baseball fields similar to the new Wayne Smith Baseball Fields to be included in the new
community park along the new Highway 40 corridor.
College Station Little League requests the building of a "big" league field at the new Veterans Park.
This field could serve a dual purpose if designed to have both eighty foot and ninety foot base
paths. By creating such a facility, College Station would provide a place for young men and adults
ages 13 and up to play baseball. The Lamar Little League has similar facilities in Richmond, Texas.
As our community continues to grow, we wish to provide our youth with the best state of the art
facilities in the entire State of Texas.
Linda Jeffre', CSCL Chairman
8409 Wildewood Circle
College Station, Texas 77845
Sharon Gable, American League President
3011 Lodgepole
College Station, Texas 77845
Ron Carter, CSLL Trustee
1308 Leacrest Drive
College Station, Texas 77840
Colette Gibbs, National League President
13700 I-GN Road
College Station, Texas 77845
c: S. Beachy, CSLL Secretary
P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue • College Station, TX 77842
Tel: 409 764 3500
May 3, 1999
Ms. Linda Jeffress
College Station Little League
8409 Wildewood Circle
College Station, Texas 77845
Dear Linda:
Thank you for your recent letter to Mayor Mcllhaney concerning future baseball facilities for our
community. The city has begun the initial process for the acquisition of a community park site
south of Barron Road and west of Texas Avenue. The site is expected to be approximately 40-50
acres and will serve a variety of community needs including youth sports. Actual design of this
future park will occur several years from now as that area of the city develops. There are no funds
approved for the development of this site at the present time.
The land for Veterans Park and Athletic Complex was acquired last year. The site includes 150
acres with frontage on University Drive and Harvey Road. The master plan for this site has not
been completed. Funding for the initial development was approved in the 1998 bond election. The
priority for the first facilities is soccer fields and adult softball facilities. Both of these programs
are seriously affected by the current lack of facilities. Full development of this large regional park
will take at least 10 years to complete. The possibility of a "big" league field has been discussed,
however, no plans have been completed or approved at this point.
The department will solicit public input concerning the development of these two parks. This is a
standard practice for our projects and interested groups will be asked to participate. This process
includes formal hearings and review by the Parks and Recreation Board prior to consideration by
the City Council.
Thanks for your interest and concern in these projects.
Sincer
Steve Beachy
Director of Parks & Recreation
copies:
Mayor Mcllhaney
Skip Noe, City Manager
Parks & Recreation Board
Home of Texas A&M University
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
PARKS & RECREATION
POST OFFICE BOX 9960
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842-9960
(409) 764-3773
MEMORANDUM
TO: Historic Preservation Committee
FROM: Steve Beachy, Director of Parks & Recreation
DATE: April 27, 1999
SUBJECT: Request to Review Park Changes in Designated Areas
The City of College Station's Parks and Recreation Board appreciates all of the hard
work you do for our community and understands that you would like to be kept
informed of upcoming events and changes. The Board is also interested in the
historical aspect of our city and will be happy to work with you on any concerns that
you have. We will be communicating through your Committee Liaison, David Gerling,
to inform you of future meetings or upcoming events. The Board welcomes you to
attend any of the Parks Board Meetings that are held on the second Tuesday of every
month. Please pass any information or concerns to David Gerling and we will be
happy to address them. Thank you for your concerns and we will be looking forward
to hearing your input.
cc: Parks & Recreation Board
David Gerling, Special Facilities Superintendent
We provide good things in life!
Lincoln Recreation Center Advisory Board Meeting
Advisory Board Regular Meeting
Minutes
Monday, May 3, 1999
Time: 6:00 p.m.
Lincoln Recreation Center
Board Members Present:
Linda Preston -Shepard, Cathy Watson, Barbara
Clemmons, Faye Daily, and alternate Board Member,
Merilyn Rucker
Board Members Absent: Franklin, Williams, Clark, III
Staff Present: Lance Jackson
LFS Representative: James Steen
Visitors Present: Mike Thomas (Brazos Christian School)
I. Call to Order -Roll Call
o Meeting was called to order by President Linda Preston -Shepard. Absent Members
included: Joe Dan Franklin, Carolyn Williams, and Rev. A.C. Clark, III
II. Approval of Minutes from previous Meeting
o The Minutes from the previous meeting were approved as- read.
III. Petitions or Communications from Visitors
❑ Presentation of scoreboard Awards to Donors Jackson presented award to Mike
Thomas (who accepted award in the absence of Mr. James Carter) from Brazos
Christian School and thanked the donors for their continued generosity.
❑ Lincoln Recreation Phone System Merilyn Rucker informed the Board that the
current LRC phone system needed modifications. There needed to be some way to
have a caller speak to a person rather than the machine.
❑ Board agreed Jackson would have another phone line installed at the LRC to
alleviate the problems with the current phone system.
IV. Treasury Report
❑ Jackson informed Board members that the balance of the Treasury as of May 3,
1999, was $1,962.46.
❑ Preston informed the Board that she would follow-up and complete the process of
establishing a checking account.
2
V. Other Business/Board Concerns:
❑ Consideration of purchase of African Software —Jackson infoiiiied the Board
members that the African American software would be purchased at a price of
$49.99.
o Juneteenth Considerations Jackson informed the Board, Judge Ronnie
McDonald, of Bastrop, Texas would be the guest speaker at the Juneteenth
Celebration, Barbara Clemmons, would be the MC and Erik Watson would be
introducing McDonald. The length of program would be approximately one and one
half-hours, with the program starting at 6:00 p.m.
o Letters would be sent out to local churches regarding the purchase of T-shirts
commemorating Juneteenth.
o Jackson informed the Board of the purchase of a speaker podium for the LRC.
❑ Jackson informed the Board members he would be mailing copies of the LRC
budget that has been previously submitted.
❑ Jackson informed the Board members of an upcoming public hearing to be held
regarding nearby properties and told the members he would contact them
regarding time and date.
❑ Board members decided, upon notification from Jackson of the time and date of
public hearing, a special meeting of the LRC Board members would be called.
❑ Board members agreed to draft and submit a letter addressing the parking needs
to the Parks Board
Other Announcements:
❑ May 17-18, City Council Annual retreat. Boards need to provide input prior to May
14th.
❑ Concerned Black Men's Banquet to be held at the LRC.
o June 7-11, Community Vacation Bible School would be held at the LRC.
❑ The Lincoln Former Student Class Reunion will take place July 2-4 at the Lincoln
Recreation Center (LRC). More information to follow at the June Meeting.
Motion made by Rucker, seconded by Watson, Meeting adjourned 7:00 p.m.
Next Advisory Board Meeting— Monday, June 14,1999 at 6:00 p.m. Lincoln
Recreation Center