HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/02/2021 - Agenda Packet - Impact Fee Advisory CommitteeCollege Station, TX
Meeting Agenda
Impact Fee Advisory Committee
1101 Texas Ave, College Station, TX 77840
Internet: https//zoom.us/j/89341147689
*Phone: 888 475 4499 and Meeting ID: 893 4114 7689
The City Council may or may not attend the Impact Fee Advisory Committee Regular Meeting.
September 2, 2021 6:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers
College Station, TX Page 1
This meeting will offer both inperson and remote participation following both the City’s
Guidelines for inperson, virtual attendance, and the speaker protocol in the agenda. The city
uses a thirdparty vendor to help host the meeting and if the callin number is not functioning
access will be through the internet link only.
1.Call to Order, Consider Absence Request.
2.Hear Visitors.
At this time, the Chairperson will open the floor to visitors wishing to address the Committee on
issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. An individual who wishes to address the
Committee regarding any item on the agenda shall register with the Committee Secretary prior to 4
p.m. on the day of the meeting. To register, the individual must provide a name and phone number
by calling 979.764.3751 or emailing khejny@cstx.gov prior to 4 p.m. To submit written comments to
the Committee, email khejny@cstx.gov and they will be distributed to the Committee. The visitor
presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to
address the Committee and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The
Committee will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter
on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and
address for the record.)
3.Consent Agenda
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Commission and will be
enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans and final plats, where staff has found
compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved
with any and all staff recommendations. Since there will not be separate discussion of these items,
citizens wishing to address the Commission regarding one or more items on the Consent Agenda
may address the Commission at this time as well. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on
the Consent Agenda it may be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration.
3.1.Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes.
Sponsors:Kristen Hejny
Attachments:1.August 5 2021 IFAC
Page 1 of 29
Impact Fee Advisory Committee
Page 2 September 2, 2021
4.Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent
Agenda by Commission action.
5.Regular Agenda
5.1.Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding draft land use
assumptions, capital improvement plans, and roadway costing template for the upcoming 5
year study updates of roadway, water, and wastewater impact fees.
Sponsors:Jason Schubert
Attachments:1.Roadway LUA draft
2.Water & Wastewater LUA draft
3.Roadway CIP Tracking Changes draft
4.Roadway CIP draft
5.Water & Wastewater Impact Fee CIP draft
6.Roadway Costing Template
6.Discussion and possible action on future agenda items.
An Impact Fee Advisory Committee Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not
been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be
given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a
subsequent meeting.
7.Adjourn.
The Impact Fee Advisory Committee may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed
on the agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion.
I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the website and at College Station City Hall,
1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on August 27, 2021 at 5:00 p.m.
City Secretary
This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting
and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters,
readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 7643541, TDD
at 18007352989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the
meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive
notification at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable
attempt to provide the necessary accommodations.
Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun.
Page 2 of 29
Impact Fee Advisory Committee
Page 3 September 2, 2021
"Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly
Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411,
Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a
Handgun that is Carried Openly."
Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia.
“Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al
aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del SubCapitulo H, Capitulo
411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta
propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.”
Page 3 of 29
August 5, 2021 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 3
MINUTES IMPACT FEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
August 5, 2021 6:00 p.m. Phone: *888 475 4499 and Webinar ID: 958 6873 6981 Internet: https://zoom.us/s/95868736981
IFAC MEMBERS PRESENT: Dennis Christiansen, Jeremy Osborne, Joe Guerra, Bobby Mirza, William Wright, Jason Cornelius, Jim Jones, Richard Woodward, and James Murr
IFAC MEMBERS ABSENT: Bill Mather COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Linda Harvell CITY STAFF PRESENT: Michael Ostrowski, Molly Hitchcock, Carol Cotter, Erika Bridges, Jason Schubert, Parker Mathews, Amy Milanes, Gary Melcher, Stephen Maldonado, Alyssa Halle-Schramm, Amy Albright, Leslie Whitten, and Kristen Hejny 1. Call Meeting to Order, Consider Absence Request.
Chairman Christiansen called the meeting to order at 6:16 p.m.
2. Hear Visitors
No visitors spoke.
3. Regular Agenda
3.1 Public Hearing, presentation and discussion regarding an overview of the City-wide roadway, water and wastewater impact fees.
Transportation Planning Coordinator Schubert opened the presentation on this item.
Chairman Christiansen asked for the Committee’s action responsibility on this item.
Transportation Planning Coordinator Schubert stated that this is an informational item only, and no action is requested from the Committee at this meeting.
Jeff Whitaker, Kimley-Horn, presented the impact fees overview to the Committee.
Committee Member Guerra asked why a section is being removed from the Water Service Area.
Richard Weatherly, Freese Nichols, stated that this section is excluded as part of the Municipal Utility District (MUD) agreement.
Committee Member Woodward stated that parts of area A and parts of area B are similar concentric circles in terms of impacts and asked why the City is divided into four sections.
Page 4 of 29
August 5, 2021 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3
Director of Planning and Development Services Ostrowski also stated that new annexation laws limit the City’s ability to grow, and therefore may not make financial sense to expand in some
areas.
Mr. Whitaker stated that they looked at a travel demand model and found that Texas Avenue was a natural east and west split, and Rock Prairie Road was a natural north and south split.
Committee Member Woodward asked why multi-family calculations were off.
Mr. Whitaker stated that a developer in an area may have built something different than originally projected.
Committee Member Woodward asked if the stub off William D. Fitch was necessitated or arbitrary to new development.
Mr. Whitaker stated that they are reevaluating that area now.
Committee Member Guerra asked how Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT) facilities for area B work.
Mr. Whitaker stated that they look at City’s contribution a project, which is about 10-20% on roadways.
Committee Member Guerra asked if the same should be done for all TXDOT facilities.
Mr. Whitaker stated that they are looking at all TXDOT facilities with City contribution.
Committee Member Murr asked about developers paying into impact fees.
Mr. Whitaker stated that developers will receive credits back on new roads or may have fees
credited if a road is already built.
Committee Member Guerra stated that AM peak traffic numbers are different than PM peak traffic numbers and asked if the highest trip generation is used.
Mr. Whitaker stated that they use the PM peak traffic numbers.
Committee Member Guerra requested that the City use the highest trip generation.
Mr. Whitaker stated that they can reevaluate if needed.
Chairman Christiansen stated that the Traffic Demand Model includes streets that are not on the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) model and asked if the MPO and City model agree.
Mr. Whitaker stated that they started with the MPO model and revised roadway map to match more roads than the MPO.
Committee Member Woodward asked about the multi-family collection rate.
Mr. Whitaker stated that multi-family is about two-thirds the cost of single-family.
Page 5 of 29
August 5, 2021 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3
Committee Member Woodward asked if development building in area D, which has impacts beyond area D gets counted.
Mr. Whitaker stated that state law caps service area size.
Committee Member Osborne asked for clarification on the difference between roadway impact fees and street maintenance fees.
Mr. Whitaker stated that maintenance fees are for maintenance such as potholes, and impact fees are for future growth.
Committee Member Murr asked that the Committee receive the presentation and of the LUA and IFCIP data calculations a week in advance of the September 2, 2021, IFAC meeting. Director of Planning and Development Services Ostrowski stated that staff plans to have documents ready and distributed a week prior to the meeting. 4. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items. An Impact Fee Advisory Committee Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not
been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
There was no discussion. 8. Adjourn
The meeting adjourned at 7:32 p.m. Approved: Attest: ______________________________ ________________________________ Dennis Christiansen, Chairman Kristen Hejny, Admin Support Specialist
Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services
Page 6 of 29
September 2, 2021
Item No. 5.1.
Draft land use assumptions, capital improvement plans, and roadway costing template for the
upcoming 5-year study updates of roadway, water, and wastewater impact fees
Sponsor:Jason Schubert
Reviewed By CBC:N/A
Agenda Caption:Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding draft land
use assumptions, capital improvement plans, and roadway costing template for the upcoming 5-year
study updates of roadway, water, and wastewater impact fees.
Relationship to Strategic Goals:
Core Services & Infrastructure
Diverse & Growing Economy
Recommendation(s): Staff requests feedback on the drafted items.
Summary: This item is to discuss and receive feedback regarding the draft land use assumptions
(LUA) and capital improvements plans (CIP), and roadway costing template for the 5-year study
updates of roadway, water, and wastewater impact fees.
On August 5th, the Impact Fee Advisory Committee (IFAC) received an overview of impact fees for
roadway, water, and wastewater. The City has contracted with Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. (KHA)
to perform the roadway impact fee study update and Freese and Nichols, Inc. (FNI) for the water and
wastewater impact fee study updates. Staff met with a stakeholder group on August 23rd to discuss
draft roadway impact fee documents and a summary of their feedback will be provided at the
meeting. The draft documents are scheduled to be presented to City Council on September 23rd.
Budget & Financial Summary: Budgetary implications are dependent upon the maximum
assessable fee that will be calculated from the finalized land use assumptions and CIP list, the
collection rate that City Council adopts, and the amount of development that occurs.
Attachments:
1.Roadway LUA draft
2.Water & Wastewater LUA draft
3.Roadway CIP Tracking Changes draft
4.Roadway CIP draft
5.Water & Wastewater Impact Fee CIP draft
6.Roadway Costing Template
Page 7 of 29
2021 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update 6 July 2021
City of College Station, Texas
3.ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CALCULATION INPUTS
LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS
Purpose
Impact Fees are a mechanism for funding the public infrastructure necessitated by growth. In
the most basic terms, impact fees are meant to recover the incremental cost of the impact of
each new unit of development growth creating new infrastructure needs. In order to assess
an impact fee, Land Use Assumptions must be developed to provide the basis for residential
and employment growth projections within a municipality. As defined by Chapter 395 of the
Texas Local Government Code, these assumptions include a description of changes in land
uses, densities, and development in the service area. The land use assumptions are then used
in determining the need and timing of transportation improvements to serve future
development.
The section documents the process used to develop the Land Use Assumptions for the City of
College Station Impact Fee study. In accordance with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local
Government Code, street impact fees must be calculated based on reasonable expectations
of residential and employment growth within the next ten years (2021 – 2031). The
following resources provided the information required to complete the Land Use Assumptions:
•Detailed historical building permit data
•Projected new developments and focus areas data
•Currently platted developments
•College Station Future Land Use Plan / Comprehensive Plan
•City of College Station Staff
Components of the Land Use Assumptions Chapter
The Land Use Assumptions include the following components:
1.Impact Fee Study Service Areas - Explanation of the divisions of College Station into
service areas for roadway service areas.Preliminary DraftPage 8 of 29
2021 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update 7 July 2021
City of College Station, Texas
2.Land Use Assumptions Methodology - An overview of the general methodology
used to generate the land use assumptions.
3.Ten-Year Growth Assumptions - Walk-through of the growth projections for 2021-
2031.
Impact Fee Study Service Areas
Service Area Definition
According to Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code, a Service Area refers to the area
within the corporate boundaries or extraterritorial jurisdiction of the political subdivision to
be served by the capital improvement or facilities specified in the Capital Improvement Plan.
Funds collected in the specific service areas must be spent in the service area collected.
Chapter 395 specifies that “the service area is limited to an area within the corporate
boundaries of the political subdivision and shall not exceed six (6) miles.” This resulted in the
creation of four (4) service areas in the City of College Station. There is no change from the
initial establishment of the service areas in the 2016 study except for minor changes due to
City Limit modifications.
Roadway Impact Fee Service Areas
The geographic boundaries of the four (4) impact fee service areas for roadway facilities
are shown in Exhibit 1. For roadway facilities, the service areas are limited to those areas
within the current corporate limits. Therefore, areas within the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ)
are excluded from this study.
The service areas east/west boundary is Texas Avenue, while a combination of Rock Prairie
Road, Graham Road, and Bird Pond Road compose the north/south boundaries. At locations
where service area boundaries follow a thoroughfare facility, the proposed boundary is
intended to follow the centerline of the roadway. In cases where a service area boundary
follows the City Limits, only those portions of the facility within the City Limits area are
included in the service area. Preliminary DraftPage 9 of 29
B
D
A
C SH
6
GRAHAM ROAD NROCK PRAIRIE ROADS T
E
X
A
S
A
V
E
N
U
E
BIRD POND ROADEsri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community
Legend
City Limits
Service Areas
A
B
C
D
NExhibit 1Service Areas
July 2021
0 10.5 MilesPreliminary DraftPage 10 of 29
2021 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update 9 July 2021
City of College Station, Texas
Land Use Assumptions Methodology
The following factors were considered in developing the residential and employment
projections:
• Character, type, density, location and quantity of existing development;
• Growth trends;
• Location of vacant land;
• Future Land Use Map and Growth Areas;
• Physical restrictions (i.e. flood plains); and
• Planned development data.
The residential and employment estimates were all compiled in accordance with the following
categories:
Residential Units - Number of residential dwelling units, including single-family and
multi-family
Employment - Square feet of building area based on three (3) different
classifications. Each classification has unique trip making characteristics.
Basic - Land use activities that produce goods and services, including those
that are exported outside the local economy (i.e. manufacturing, construction,
transportation, wholesale, trade, warehousing, and other industrial uses)
Service - Land use activities which provide personal and professional services
such as government and other professional offices
Retail - Land use activities which provide for the retail sale of goods that
primarily serve households and whose location choice is oriented toward the
household sector (i.e. grocery stores and restaurants)
Preliminary DraftPage 11 of 29
2021 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update 10 July 2021
City of College Station, Texas
The above categories in the Land Use Assumptions match those used to develop the City’s
travel demand modeling and are the broader land use categories that are used in the
development of the assumptions for impact fees. In the calculation of the specific Street
Impact Fee, a more specific and expanded classification based on the Institute of
Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual will be utilized.
Growth projections for the next 10 years (2021 – 2031) for the City of College Station were
established using three data sources: known residential developments, specific focus areas,
and other City-identified infill growth areas.
Known Residential Developments
The City provided existing data for known residential developments that was used to project
for residential needs.
Specific Focus Areas
Four (4) focus areas of growth are projected to experience growth from 2021 – 2031 and
based on information from the City detailed growth projects were developed. These four
areas included University Drive East in Service Area A, Northgate and Research Valley
BioCorridor in Service Area B, and Midtown in Service Area D.
City-Identified Infill Growth Areas
The City-identified infill growth areas consist of many locations, varying in size and land use
of vacant land that would be infilled. Different land use densities or floor area ratios were
applied based on the land use classification of each development identified in the Future
Land Use Plan.
Preliminary DraftPage 12 of 29
2021 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update 11 July 2021
City of College Station, Texas
10-Year Growth Assumptions
Table 1 summarizes the growth projections by service area.
Table 1. Residential and Employment Land Use Assumptions Growth Projections (2021-2031)
Service Area Single-Family
(Units)
Multi-Family
(Units)
Basic
(Sq. Ft.)
Service
(Sq. Ft.)
Retail
(Sq. Ft.)
SA A 410 2,038 - 1,174,000 1,480,000
SA B 429 1,937 350,000 1,063,000 953,000
SA C 1,824 127 - 506,000 469,000
SA D 693 751 984,000 1,089,000 895,000
Total 3,356 4,853 1,334,000 3,832,000 3,797,000
For comparison purposes, College Station had 12,774 units of residential growth (single-
family and multi-family) and approximately 8,000,000 square feet of employment growth
(basic, service, and retail) from 2011 – 2020. College Station experienced record growth
during this time period. Based on the next ten-year growth projections within College Station
City Limits shows residential growth is projected to slow but employment is consistent.
Preliminary DraftPage 13 of 29
Land Use Assumptions
•Establishes Infrastructure Demands used in Master Plans
•Population and Housing Unit Projections obtained from projected new developments
•Coordinating with Future Land Use Plan
Page 14 of 29
Process
2021
Water
Service Area
To be removed from
Impact Fee Service Area
Impact Fee Service Area
to be reviewed by IFAC
Year LUEs Growth in
LUEs
2021 55,940 -
2031 69,824 13,884
Buildout 77,881 8,057
Page 15 of 29
Process
2021
Wastewater
Service Area
To be removed from
Impact Fee Service Area
To be added to Impact
Fee Service Area
Impact Fee Service Area
to be reviewed by IFAC
Year LUEs Growth in
LUEs
2021 58,683 -
2031 72,522 13,839
Buildout 83,280 10,758
Page 16 of 29
!
!
!
!
!
!HARVEY MITCHELL PARKW AY SSH 6WE
L
L
B
O
R
N R
O
A
DUNIVERSITY DRIVEWILLIAM D. FITCH PARKWAYBOONVILLE ROAD
TEXAS AVENUE S
UNIVERSITY DRIVES
H 6
Legend
!
!
!
RETAIN - PROJECT IN EXISTING IMPACT FEE STUDY AND RETAINED IN UPDATED STUDY
ADDITION - PROJECT NOT IN EXISTING IMPACT FEE STUDY AND BEING ADDED WITH UPDATED STUDY
REMOVE - PROJECT IN EXISTING IMPACT FEE STUDY AND NOT RETAINED WITH UPDATED STUDY
FUTURE - OTHER THOROUGHFARE PROJECTS NOT INCLUDED IN THE UPDATED STUDY
NTracking Changes for Roadway Impact Fee CIP - Service Area A
August 2021
0 10.5 Miles
Roadways that were removed from the Thoroughfare Plan since 2016 do not show up on this update map but areremoved as well.Preliminary DraftPage 17 of 29
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
SH 6
WELLBORN ROAD
HARV EY MITCH E LL PA RK WAY S
SH 47
WILLIAM D. FITCH PARKWAYUNIVERSITY DRIVEU N IV E R SIT Y D R IV E ETEXAS AVENUE S
RAYMOND STOTZER PARKWAYSH 6Legend
!
!
!
RETAIN - PROJECT IN EXISTING IMPACT FEE STUDY AND RETAINED IN UPDATED STUDY
ADDITION - PROJECT NOT IN EXISTING IMPACT FEE STUDY AND BEING ADDED WITH UPDATED STUD
REMOVE - PROJECT IN EXISTING IMPACT FEE STUDY AND NOT RETAINED WITH UPDATED STUDY
FUTURE - OTHER THOROUGHFARE PROJECTS NOT INCLUDED IN THE UPDATED STUDY
NTracking Changes for Roadway Impact FeeCIP - Service Area B
August 2021
0 10.5 Miles
Roadways that were removed from the Thoroughfare Plan since 2016 do not show up on this update map but areremoved as well.Preliminary DraftPage 18 of 29
!!
!
!
!
!
!
SH 6
WELLBORN ROAD WILLIAM D. FITCH PARKWAYHARVEY M ITCHELL PARKW AY STEXAS AVEN
U
E SSH 6Legend
!
!
!
RETAIN - PROJECT IN EXISTING IMPACT FEE STUDY AND RETAINED IN UPDATED STUDY
ADDITION - PROJECT NOT IN EXISTING IMPACT FEE STUDY AND BEING ADDED WITH UPDATED STUDY
REMOVE - PROJECT IN EXISTING IMPACT FEE STUDY AND NOT RETAINED WITH UPDATED STUDY
FUTURE - OTHER THOROUGHFARE PROJECTS NOT INCLUDED IN THE UPDATED STUDY
NTracking Changes for Roadway Impact FeeCIP - Service Area C
August 2021
0 10.5 Miles
Roadways that were removed from the Thoroughfare Plan since 2016 do not show up on this update map but areremoved as well.Preliminary DraftPage 19 of 29
SH 6 WILLIAM D. FITCH PARKWAYWELLBORN ROADHARVEY MITCHELL PARKWAY SSH 30
TEXAS AVEN
UE SSH 6TEXAS AVENUE S
Legend
!
!
!
RETAIN - PROJECT IN EXISTING IMPACT FEE STUDY AND RETAINED IN UPDATED STUDY
ADDITION - PROJECT NOT IN EXISTING IMPACT FEE STUDY AND BEING ADDED WITH UPDATED STUD
REMOVE - PROJECT IN EXISTING IMPACT FEE STUDY AND NOT RETAINED WITH UPDATED STUDY
FUTURE - OTHER THOROUGHFARE PROJECTS NOT INCLUDED IN THE UPDATED STUDY
NTracking Changes for Roadway Impact Fee CIP - Service Area D
August 2021
0 10.5 Miles
Roadways that were removed from the Thoroughfare Plan since 2016 do not show up on this update map but areremoved as well.Preliminary DraftPage 20 of 29
!
!
!
S
H
6
TEX
A
S UNIVERSITYHARVEYBIRD BONDD
ARTMOUTH
ROCK PRAIRIESOUTHWESTCOP
P
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
TARROWLAS
S
I
EGEORGEBUSHE
Legend
FUTURE THOROUGHFARE
WIDENING
PARTIAL WIDENING
CONSTRUCTED - EXCESS CAPACITY
OTHER THOROUGHFARES
!INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT - FUTURE
!INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT - EXISTING
NExhibit 2CIP - Service Area A
August 2021
0 10.5 MilesPreliminary DraftPage 21 of 29
!
!
!
!
!
!
TEX
A
S
WE
L
L
B
O
R
N
HAR
V
E
Y
M
I
T
C
H
E
L
LF & B ROADHOL
LEM
A
N
HO
P
E
C
R
E
E
K GEORGE BUSHN DOWLINGSOUTHWESTROCK PRAIRIERAYMOND STOTZERSH
6
ROCK P R AIRIEWUNIVERSITYCO
L
L
E
G
E
LUTHERJONES
B
U
T
L
E
RTU
R
K
E
Y
C
R
E
E
K
PE
N
B
E
R
T
H
Y
Legend
FUTURE THOROUGHFARE
WIDENING
PARTIAL WIDENING
CONSTRUCTED - EXCESS CAPACITY
OTHER THOROUGHFARE
!INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT - FUTURE
!INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT - CONSTRUCTED
NExhibit 2CIP - Service Area B
August 2021
0 10.5 MilesPreliminary DraftPage 22 of 29
!
!
!
!
!
!
SH
6
I-GNWELLBORNROCK PRAIRI
E
BARRONHOLLEMA
N
WS
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S ARRINGTONGREENS PRAIRIEWILLIAM D FITCHRO
Y
D
E
R
TOWERS
R O CKPRA IRIEWPEBBLE
C
R
EE
K
HARVEY MITCHEL L
C O R PORATE
LAKE
W
A
YN A NTUCKETCAPSTONE TOWNLAKEMI
D
T
O
W
N
VICT
ORIAROCK PRAIRIESH
6
WE
L
L
B
O
R
N
SH
6
WILLIAM D FIT CH
Legend
Future Thoroughfare
Widening
Partial Widening
Constructed - Excess Capacity
Other Thoroughfares
!Intersection Improvement - Future
!Intersection Improvement - Constructed
NExhibit 2CIP - Service Area C
August 2021
0 10.5 MilesPreliminary DraftPage 23 of 29
!
!
!
SH
6
ROCK PRAIRI
E
WILLIAM D FITCHPE
B
B
L
E
C
R
E
E
KBIRD PONDN A N T UCKETC O RPORATE
LAKEWAYTOWNLAKEMI
D
T
O
W
N
SOUTHERNPOINTELegend
!INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT - FUTURE
!INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT - CONSTRUCTED
FUTURE THOROUGHFARE
WIDENING
PARTIAL WIDENING
CONSTRUCTED - EXCESS CAPACITY
OTHER THOROUGHFARES
NExhibit 2CIP - Service Area D
August 2021
0 10.5 MilesPreliminary DraftPage 24 of 29
2021 Water
Impact Fee CIP
Page 25 of 29
Process
2021 Wastewater
Impact Fee CIP
Page 26 of 29
Project Description of Project
A Royder/Live Oak Sewer Service
B Bee Creek Interceptor Phase 1, 2, and Design of 3
C Lick Creek Trunk Line
D Medical District Trunk Line Phase 1 (Participation Agreement)
E Northeast Trunk Line Phase 1, 2, and Design of 3
F Southwood Valley Trunk Line Phase 1
G Eastside Gravity Line, Lift Station, and Force Main
H Carters Creek Diversion Lift Station Phase 1
I Lick Creek WWTP Phase 1 Expansion
J Creek Meadows Lift Station Upsizing and Force Main
K Nagle Student Housing Sewer Oversize Participation
L 2021 Impact Fee Update
Project Description of Project
A High Service Pumping Improvements
B Bio-Corridor Water Line
C Area 2 Water Line Extension
D Cooling Tower Expansion
E Well No. 10 Land Acquisition
F SH 6 Water Line
G Well No. 9 and Collection Line
H Midtown Drive 12-Inch Water Line
I 3.0 MG Elevated Storage Tank and Pressure Reducing Valves
J Dowling Road Pump Station North Water Line Replacement
K The Crossing at Lick Creek Phase 1 –3 Oversize Participation
L Embassy Suites Water Line Oversize Participation
M Brazos Valley Auto Complex Oversize Participation
N Castlegate II Oversize Participation
O Greens Prairie Oversize Participation
P Summit Crossing Ph 3A Oversize Participation
Q Traditions Water Oversize Participation
R 2021 Impact Fee Study
Recently constructed improvements with
excess capacity to accommodate growth
Wastewater Impact Fee Existing CIP Water Impact Fee Existing CIP
Page 27 of 29
Project
Number Project Name
1 New and Replacement 12-inch Rock Prairie
Road Water Line
2 New 18-Inch Midtown Business Center
Water Line
3 SH 40 Water Line Extension –Graham
Road to Barron Road
4 SH 40 Water Line Extension -Sonoma
Subdivision to Victoria Avenue
5 BioCorridor Water Line Improvements
6 Water Supply Well No. 10
7 Harvey Mitchel Parkway Water Line
Replacement
Project
Number Project Name
1 30/36-Inch Northeast Interceptor Phase 3
2 27-Inch Northeast Interceptor Phase 4
3 Medical District Interceptor Phase 2
4 Hensel Park Lift Station Expansion (to 4.5 MGD) and 24-Inch Gravity Line
5 42/48-Inch Bee Creek Interceptor Phase 3
6 15/18/24/30/36-Inch Southwood Valley Interceptor Phase 2
7 Lick Creek WWTP Phase 2 Expansion (to 8.0 MGD)
8 Replacement 18/21-Inch Alum Creek Trunk Line
9 New and Replacement 18-Inch Alum Creek Trunk Line
10 8-Inch Creek Meadows Force Main Re-Routed to Alum Creek Trunk Line
11 Medical District Interceptor Phase 3
12 21/24-Inch Harvey Road Replacement Gravity Line
13 Eastside Lift Station Expansion (to 1.3 MGD)
Wastewater Impact Fee Proposed CIP Water Impact Fee Proposed CIP
Page 28 of 29
City of College Station Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
2021 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update updated:8/19/2021
Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection
Project Information:Description:Project No.11
Name:Example Minor Arterial
Limits:ONE MILE
Impact Fee Class:4 LANE MINOR ARTERIAL
Length (lf):5,280
Service Area(s):TBD
Roadway Construction Cost Projection
No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost
109 Unclassified Street Excavation 21,120 cy 9.00$ 190,080$
209 8" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 36#/sy)41,067 sy 7.00$ 287,467$
309 Reinforced Concrete Pavement with Integral Curb 38,720 sy 65.00$ 2,516,800$
409 4" Topsoil 15,840 sy 4.00$ 63,360$
509 6' Concrete Sidewalk 63,360 sf 6.00$ 380,160$
609 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 4,987 sy 72.00$ 359,040$
Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:3,796,907$
Major Construction Component Allowances**:
Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost
√Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%189,845$
√Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Bicycle Facilties 3%113,907$
√Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 25%949,227$
√Illumination 6%227,814$
Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0%-$
√Water Minor Adjustments 3%113,907$
√Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%75,938$
√Landscaping and Irrigation 4%151,876$
Miscellaneous:$0 -$
**Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,822,515$
Paving and Allowance Subtotal:5,619,422$
Construction Contingency:15%842,913$
Mobilization 5%280,971$
Prep ROW 3%168,583$
Construction Cost TOTAL:6,912,000$
Impact Fee Project Cost Summary
Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost
Construction:- 6,912,000$
Engineering/Survey/Testing:12%829,440$
Previous City contribution
Other
ROW/Easement Acquisition:TBD -$
Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:7,741,000$
This project consists of the construction of a 4-lane
minor arterial.
NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future
Capital Improvement Planning within the City of College Station.
The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project.
2021 Roadway Impact Fee Study
City of College Station, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost ProjectionsPreliminary DraftPage 29 of 29