HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/02/2021 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning CommissionCollege Station, TX
Meeting AgendaPlanning and Zoning Commission
1101 Texas Ave, College Station, TX 77840Internet: https//zoom.us/j/89341147689*Phone: 888 475 4499 and Meeting ID: 893 4114 7689
The City Council may or may not attend the Planning & Zoning Commission Regular Meeting.
September 2, 2021 6:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers
College Station, TX Page 1
This meeting will offer both in-person and remote participation following both the City’s
Guidelines for in-person, virtual attendance, and the speaker protocol in the agenda. The city
uses a third-party vendor to help host the meeting and if the call-in number is not functioning
access will be through the internet link only.
1.Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request.
2.Hear Visitors.
At this time, the Chairperson will open the floor to visitors wishing to address the Commission on
issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. An individual who wishes to address the
Commission regarding any item on the agenda shall register with the Commission Secretary prior to
4 p.m. on the day of the meeting. To register, the individual must provide a name and phone number
by calling 979.764.3751 or emailing khejny@cstx.gov prior to 4 p.m. To submit written comments to
the Commission, email khejny@cstx.gov and they will be distributed to the Commission. The visitor
presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to
address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The
Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or w ill place the matter
on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and
address for the record.)
3.Informational
3.1.Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City.
New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev
3.2.Discussion of Minor / Amending Plats approved by Staff:
Saddle Creek Subdivision; Phase 3, Block 6, Lots 128R-A & 128R-B ~ Case #FP2021-
000020
Sponsors:Robin Macias
Page 1 of 16
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 2 September 2, 2021
3.3.Presentation, and discussion regarding an update on items heard:
A Rezoning from R Rural to WC Wellborn Commercial on approximately one acre
located at 14899 - 14895 FM 2154. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item
on August 19, 2021 and voted (5-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this
item on August 26, 2021 and voted (7-0) to approve the request.
3.4.Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings:
Thursday, September 9, 2021 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open
Meeting 5:00 p.m. (Liaison - Mirza)
Thursday, September 16, 2021 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m
Thursday, September 23, 2021 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open
Meeting 5:00 p.m. (Liaison - Christiansen)
Thursday, October 7, 2021 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m
3.5. Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, BioCorridor
Board.
4.Consent Agenda
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Commission and will be
enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans and final plats, where staff has found
compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved
with any and all staff recommendations. Since there will not be separate discussion of these items,
citizens wishing to address the Commission regarding one or more items on the Consent Agenda
may address the Commission at this time as well. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on
the Consent Agenda it may be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration.
4.1.Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes.
Attachments:1.August 19 2021
4.2.Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a Final Plat for Pershing Pointe
Subdivision Phase 2B and 2C on approximately 5 acres, generally located between Holleman
Drive South and Towers Parkway, south of Deacon West Drive. Case #FP2021-000024
Sponsors:Jesse Dimeolo
Attachments:1.Staff Report
2.Vicinity Map, Aerial, and Small Area Map
3.Final Plat
5.Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent
Agenda by Commission action.
Page 2 of 16
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 3 September 2, 2021
6.Discussion and possible action on future agenda items.
A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A
statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any
deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent
meeting.
7.Adjourn.
The Planning and Zoning Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed
on the agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion.
I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the website and at College Station City Hall,
1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on August 27, 2021 at 5:00 p.m.
City Secretary
This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters,
readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations.
Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun."Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a Handgun that is Carried Openly."
Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia.“Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.”
Page 3 of 16
August 19, 2021 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 8
MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
August 19, 2021 6:00 p.m. Phone: *888 475 4499 and Webinar ID: 969 1926 3533 Internet: https://zoom.us/s/96919263533
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Dennis Christiansen, Joe Guerra, Bobby Mirza, William Wright, and Jason Cornelius
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Bill Mather and Jeremy Osborne COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Elizabeth Cunha CITY STAFF PRESENT: Michael Ostrowski, Molly Hitchcock, Carol Cotter, Erika Bridges, Jason Schubert, Anthony Armstrong, Alma Guerra, Parker Mathews, Amy Milanes, Rachel Lazo, Jesse DiMeolo, Amy Albright, Venessa Garza, Carla Robinson, and Kristen Hejny 1. Call Meeting to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request.
Chairman Christiansen called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
2. Hear Visitors
No visitors spoke.
3. Informational Agenda
3.1 Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City
New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev
There was no discussion.
3.2 Discussion of Minor / Amending Plats approved by Staff:
• Waters Edge Subdivision; Block 1, Lots 1 & 2 ~ Case #FPCO2021-000003
There was no discussion.
Agenda Item #3.3 was heard after Agenda Item #6.3
3.3 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on the City’s proposed Thoroughfare Plan. Transportation Planning Coordinator Schubert presented this informational item to the Commission. Commissioner Guerra spoke on the high-speed rail and a shuttle run by Brazos Transit District. Mr. Guerra also requested staff explore other funding options.
Page 4 of 16
August 19, 2021 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 8
Commissioner Guerra spoke on the current Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT) project for State Highway 6 and asked if it is reflective in the current level of service.
Transportation Planning Coordinator Schubert stated that the consultant has been advised to update the network and model to what is proposed with the State Highway 6 project with the interchanges and lane additions, however they did not update the level of service calculations. Commissioner Guerra spoke on the Rock Prairie Road at Longmire Drive upgrades and the proposed Barron Road extension to State Highway 6. Commissioner Guerra spoke on State Highway 40, stating that the 2015 level of service map is green and in the 2021 map, it is red.
Transportation Planning Coordinator Schubert stated that this is currently in the model as a limited access roadway.
Commissioner Guerra stated that this level of service is unacceptable because of the development happening in this area.
Commissioner Guerra recommended developing a Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) corridor along State Highway 40 to capture TIF funds from new development to negotiate with TXDOT on payments. Commissioner Guerra pointed out the unacceptable levels of service at the intersection of Arrington Road and Greens Prairie Road. Mr. Guerra asked if staff has explored putting a thoroughfare between Castlegate Drive and Arrington Road to provide an alternative route. Transportation Planning Coordinator Schubert stated that there is not a proposed thoroughfare in this area. Commissioner Guerra stated that around the Texas A&M Campus there are not any roadway
networks on campus and asked if the travel demand model took into account that there are traffic movements within campus. Transportation Planning Coordinator Schubert stated that the travel demand model does take into account campus connections and has been reflected.
Commissioner Guerra stated that the Southern Point Development has very few connections to State Highway 6 and the existing connections and thoroughfares are overloaded. Transportation Planning Coordinator Schubert stated that throughfares such as Darlington Avenue is constructed but not reflected in the model, as well as Pipeline Road to the east of the development would add capacity and connectivity. Commissioner Guerra commented on connections to the future interstate west of Carter Creek, and noted that there are not many thoroughfares on the level of service map and there needs to be connections to that area.
Page 5 of 16
August 19, 2021 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 8
Transportation Planning Coordinator Schubert stated that Carter Creek has limited crossings, but along the corridor there are University Drive, Harvey Road, William D. Fitch Parkway, Bird Pond
Road and N. Forest Parkway as connections. Chairman Christiansen stated that there is a 10-year integrated mobility plan but no stated goals to accomplish it. Mr. Christiansen also stated that congestion is the citizen’s biggest concern.
3.4 Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings:
• Thursday, August 26, 2021 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 5:00 p.m. (Liaison - Osborne)
• Thursday, September 2, 2021 ~ P&Z Meeting and Impact Fee Advisory Committee (IFAC) ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m.
• Thursday, September 9, 2021 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 5:00 p.m. (Liaison – Mirza)
• Thursday, September 16, 2021 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m.
There was no discussion. 3.5 Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, BioCorridor Board. There was no discussion
Consent Agenda
4.1 Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes.
• August 5, 2021
4.2 Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a Final Plat for Winding Creek Estates Phase 4 on approximately 25.3 acres, generally located northeast of the intersection of Stousland Road and Big Trail in the College Station Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). Case #FP2020-000038
Commissioner Wright motioned to approve the Consent Agenda. Commissioner Guerra seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). 5. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission Action.
No items were removed from the Consent Agenda. 6. Regular Agenda 6.1 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4, “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2
“Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from R Rural to WC Wellborn Commercial on approximately one acre located in the Benjamin Graham Subdivision, Block B, Lots 1-6, generally located at 14889 –
Page 6 of 16
August 19, 2021 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 8
14895 FM 2154. Case #REZ2021-000005 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the August 26, 2021 City Council Meeting – subject to change). Staff Planner DiMeolo presented the rezoning to the Commission and recommended approval. Chairman Christiansen asked if the Rural zoning designation was imposed upon annexation. Staff Planner DiMeolo confirmed that the property was annexed with the Rural zoning designation. Chairman Christiansen opened the public hearing. No one spoke.
Chairman Christiansen closed the public hearing. Commissioner Wright motioned to recommend approval of the Rezoning. Commissioner Mirza seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). 6.2 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending
the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map from Suburban Commercial to Urban for approximately 10 acres, generally located at 1660 Graham Road. Case #CPA2021-000002 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 9, 2021 City Council Meeting – subject to change). Senior Planner Lazo presented the Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Commission and recommended approval. Chairman Christiansen asked for the attendance on the second neighborhood meeting held by the applicant.
Senior Planner Lazo stated that the meeting drew 10 – 15 citizens. Chairman Christiansen requested clarification that only townhouses can be built using this land use. Senior Planner Lazo confirmed that the developer can only build townhomes.
Commissioner Guerra asked for the number of dwelling units proposed with the density cap of 11 dwelling units per acre. Senior Planner Lazo stated that the gross density allows 11 dwelling units per acre, amounting to 110 dwelling units in total. Commissioner Guerra asked if the development would have a Homeowners Association (HOA). Developer Matthew Stewart confirmed that the development will have an HOA.
Commissioner Guerra asked if the development will be gated.
Page 7 of 16
August 19, 2021 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 8
Mr. Stewart confirmed that the community will not be gated.
Commissioner Guerra commented on the petition opposing the development, containing 230 signatures asking for a list of the contended items. Senior Planner Lazo clarified that the petition did not have commentary. Commissioner Guerra asked if an Urban designation would allow for a mix of townhomes and restaurants. Senior Planner Lazo stated that an Urban designation would not allow a mix. Commissioner Mirza stated that this development will have two access points and asked how
traffic will be mitigated. Transportation Planning Coordinator Schubert stated that there will be one access point to Graham
Road. Commissioner Cornelius asked for the citizen opposition during the neighborhood meeting.
Senior Planner Lazo stated that residents were opposed to a specific layout which were addressed with community benefits. Ms. Lazo also stated that residents were more favorable toward a Suburban Commercial designation. Applicant, Crissy Hartl, Mitchell & Morgan Engineers, College Station, presented to the Commission. Chairman Christiansen opened the public hearing. Property Owner, Mary Elizabeth Herring, College Station, spoke in favor of the Comprehensive
Plan amendment. Developer, Matthew Stewart, College Station, spoke in favor of the Comprehensive Plan amendment. Commissioner Guerra asked if these homes will be owner occupied.
Mr. Stewart confirmed that the intent is that these homes will be owner occupied. Kyle Bryant, College Station, presented to the Commission and spoke in opposition of the Comprehensive Plan amendment citing concerns for non-owner-occupied homes and a need for retail in the area. Commissioner Wright asked for clarification on why the residents started a petition. Mr. Bryant stated that residents would prefer the property stay with a Suburban Commercial designation.
Page 8 of 16
August 19, 2021 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 8
Applicant, Veronica Morgan, Mitchell & Morgan Engineers, College Station, spoke in favor of the Comprehensive Plan amendment stating that a product more compatible has been presented to the
Commission and residents. Ms. Morgan also stated that a Suburban Commercial designation is not the best use of the property. Andrew Spellman, College Station, Dove Crossing, spoke in opposition of the Comprehensive Plan amendment citing concerns for aesthetics, privacy, and traffic. Chairman Christiansen closed the public hearing. Commissioner Guerra asked since this is a Planned Development District if the Commission can suggest modifications with a motion.
City Attorney Robinson stated that the Commission can legally make a conditional PDD recommendation, however the Commission cannot take action to recommend a use that would be more dense than proposed and legally posted for.
Commissioner Guerra recommended a compromise in setting aside a couple of acres for restaurant use along with the townhome use.
Mr. Stewart clarified that he is only interested in the land use and rezoning changes that are proposed. Director of Planning & Development Services Ostrowski clarified that even though the land use and rezoning requests were presented together by staff, two separate motions and votes will be required. Commissioner Guerra motioned to recommend denial of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The motion was not seconded. There was general discussion amongst the Commission. Commissioner Guerra stated that a townhome development is appropriate for this location and suggested either postponing the vote or voting against the change until the developer can reach a compromise with neighborhood.
Commissioner Cornelius asked if Mr. Bryant or Mr. Spellman attended the neighborhood meetings. Both Mr. Bryant and Mr. Spellman confirmed they were in attendance. There was general discussion amongst the Commission. Commissioner Wright motioned to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Commissioner Cornelius seconded the motion. There was general discussion
The motion passed (5-0).
Page 9 of 16
August 19, 2021 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 7 of 8
6.3 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 4, “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2
“Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from R Rural to PDD Planned Development District on approximately 10 acres of land generally located at 1660 Graham Road. Case #REZ2021-000006 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 9, 2021 City Council Meeting – subject to change). Commissioner Wright asked for the repercussions if the developer develops illegally. City Attorney Robinson stated that the City would be in the position of enforcing the Unified Development Ordinance against the applicant.
Ms. Hartl stated that a Site Plan would not be processed, a plat would not be filed, and building permits would not be issued to the developer if there were illegal development.
Mr. Stewart spoke on landscaping, buffer requirements to be utilized. Chairman Christiansen opened the public hearing.
Kyle Bryant, College Station, spoke on the Rezoning, citing concerns for affordable housing and not wanting apartments on the property. Chairman Christiansen closed the public hearing. Commissioner Wright motioned to recommend approval of the Rezoning. Commissioner Cornelius seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). Chairman Christiansen adjourned the meeting for a five-minute break at 7:30 p.m.
The Meeting reconvened at 7:35 with agenda item #3.3. 7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items. A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any
deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. There was no discussion. 8. Adjourn
The meeting adjourned at 8:53 p.m. Approved: Attest:
______________________________ ________________________________
Page 10 of 16
August 19, 2021 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 8 of 8
Dennis Christiansen, Chairman Kristen Hejny, Admin Support Specialist Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services
Page 11 of 16
Planning & Zoning Commission
September 2, 2021
Scale 50 residential lots on approximately 5 acres
Location Generally between Holleman Dr. South and Towers Parkway, south of
Deacon West Dr.
Property Owner DWS Development Inc.
Applicant Schultz Engineering LLC
Project Manager Jesse DiMeolo, Staff Planner
jdimeolo@cstx.gov
Project Overview This plat will establish lots within the Pershing Pointe Subdivision. These
two phases of the development will consist of 50 residential lots, and
two common areas. The zoning is Planned Development District (PDD)
with a base zoning of T Townhouse.
Preliminary Plan March 2020
Public Infrastructure 20 water and sewer connections are being installed to service the
subdivision
Parkland Dedication Parkland dedication fee-in-lieu for 50 single-family lots, totaling $63,050,
will be due prior to filing of the plat.
Traffic Impact Analysis Not required
Compliant with Comprehensive Plan
(including Master Plans) and Unified
Development Ordinance
Yes
Compliant with Subdivision
Regulations
Yes
Staff Recommendation Approval
Supporting Materials
1. Vicinity Map, Aerial, and Small Area Map
2. Final Plat
Final Plat
of
Pershing Pointe Subdivision Phases 2B and 2C
FP2021-000024
Page 12 of 16
Page 13 of 16
Page 14 of 16
Page 15 of 16
12
1
12
1 2
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
7
21 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 3322 12
1
12
1 2
19
20
21
22
2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10
14
15
16
17
18
COMMON
AREA 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
COMMON
AREA 5
& PRIVATE
DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
5
COMMONAREA7R
3R
2R
1R
13R 14R12R11R10R9R8R7R6R5R4R
BLOCK 4
BLOCK 5 BLOCK 5
BLOCK 1
BLOCK 1
BLOCK 2
BLOCK 4
BLOCK 4
BLOCK 5
BLOCK 5
BLOCK 5
BLOCK 5
BLOCK 4 BLOCK 4
HAYES LANEHOLLEMANDRIVE SOUTHMOMMA BEARDRIVEMOMMA BEAR DRIVE
HAYES LANEHAYES LANE
PAPA BEAR DRIVEHAYES LANE
MOMMA BEARDRIVEMOMMA BEAR DRIVE
EXPEDITION WAYTOWERS PARKWAYHAYES LANE
HAYES
L
A
N
E
PAPA BEAR DRIVEPHASE 2A
PERSHING POINTEVILLAS PHASE 1VOL 14370, PG 149
PERSHING POINTEVILLAS PHASE 2AVOL 16057, PG 81
PERSHING POINTEVILLAS PHASE 1VOL 14370, PG 149
PERSHING POINTE VILLASPHASE 1 REPLATVOL 16655, PG 134
1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 105 11 12
COMMON
AREA 8 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 COMMONAREA 9 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31
BLOCK 3 BLOCK 3
BLOCK 4BLOCK 4BLOCK 4
PERSHING POINTEVILLAS PHASE 2AVOL 14370, PG 149
PERSHING POINTEVILLAS PHASE 1VOL 14370, PG 149
PERSHING POINTEVILLAS PHASE 1VOL 14370, PG 149
PERSHING POINTEVILLAS PHASE 1VOL 14370, PG 149
PHASE 2B
PHASE 2C
TBPE NO. 12327
911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.College Station, Texas 77840
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER:
FINAL PLAT
PERSHING POINTE VILLAS
SUBDIVISION
PHASE 2B
2.905 ACRES
29 LOTS
BLOCK 4, LOTS 31-59
COMMON AREA 9PHASE 2C
1.972 ACRES
21 LOTS
BLOCK 3, LOTS 1-21
COMMON AREA 8
CRAWFORD BURNETT LEAGUE, A-7
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
SURVEYOR:
Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502
Kerr Surveying, LLC409 N. Texas Ave.
Bryan, TX 77803
(979) 268-3195TBPELS FIRM # 10018500
SCALE 1'' = 40'AUGUST, 2021
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
DWS Development Inc.
1289 North Harvey Mitchell Pkwy
Bryan, TX 77803(979) 779-7209
LEGEND
LEGEND
HOLLEMAN DR
S
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE DEACON W DRW
E
L
L
B
O
R
N
R
D
ROCK PRAIRIE RD WDEACON W DRTO
W
E
R
S
P
K
W
Y
PAGE 1 OF 2
Page 16 of 16
College Station, TX
Meeting AgendaImpact Fee Advisory Committee
1101 Texas Ave, College Station, TX 77840
Internet: https//zoom.us/j/89341147689
*Phone: 888 475 4499 and Meeting ID: 893 4114 7689
The City Council may or may not attend the Impact Fee Advisory Committee Regular Meeting.
September 2, 2021 6:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers
College Station, TX Page 1
This meeting will offer both inperson and remote participation following both the City’s
Guidelines for inperson, virtual attendance, and the speaker protocol in the agenda. The city
uses a third-party vendor to help host the meeting and if the call-in number is not functioning
access will be through the internet link only.
1.Call to Order, Consider Absence Request.
2.Hear Visitors.
At this time, the Chairperson will open the floor to visitors wishing to address the Committee on
issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. An individual who wishes to address the
Committee regarding any item on the agenda shall register with the Committee Secretary prior to 4
p.m. on the day of the meeting. To register, the individual must provide a name and phone number
by calling 979.764.3751 or emailing khejny@cstx.gov prior to 4 p.m. To submit written comments to
the Committee, email khejny@cstx.gov and they will be distributed to the Committee. The visitor
presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to
address the Committee and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The
Committee will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter
on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and
address for the record.)
3.Consent Agenda
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Commission and will be
enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans and final plats, where staff has found
compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved
with any and all staff recommendations. Since there will not be separate discussion of these items,
citizens wishing to address the Commission regarding one or more items on the Consent Agenda
may address the Commission at this time as well. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on
the Consent Agenda it may be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration.
3.1.Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes.
Sponsors:Kristen Hejny
Attachments:1.August 5 2021 IFAC
Page 1 of 29
Impact Fee Advisory Committee
Page 2 September 2, 2021
4.Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent
Agenda by Commission action.
5.Regular Agenda
5.1.Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding draft land use
assumptions, capital improvement plans, and roadway costing template for the upcoming 5-
year study updates of roadway, water, and wastewater impact fees.
Sponsors:Jason Schubert
Attachments:1.Roadway LUA draft
2.Water & Wastewater LUA draft
3.Roadway CIP Tracking Changes draft
4.Roadway CIP draft
5.Water & Wastewater Impact Fee CIP draft
6.Roadway Costing Template
6.Discussion and possible action on future agenda items.
An Impact Fee Advisory Committee Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not
been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be
given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a
subsequent meeting.
7.Adjourn.
The Impact Fee Advisory Committee may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed
on the agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion.
I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the website and at College Station City Hall,
1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on August 27, 2021 at 5:00 p.m.
City Secretary
This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters,
readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD
at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations.
Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun.
Page 2 of 29
Impact Fee Advisory Committee
Page 3 September 2, 2021
"Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a Handgun that is Carried Openly."
Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia.“Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.”
Page 3 of 29
August 5, 2021 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 3
MINUTES IMPACT FEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
August 5, 2021 6:00 p.m. Phone: *888 475 4499 and Webinar ID: 958 6873 6981 Internet: https://zoom.us/s/95868736981
IFAC MEMBERS PRESENT: Dennis Christiansen, Jeremy Osborne, Joe Guerra, Bobby Mirza, William Wright, Jason Cornelius, Jim Jones, Richard Woodward, and James Murr
IFAC MEMBERS ABSENT: Bill Mather COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Linda Harvell CITY STAFF PRESENT: Michael Ostrowski, Molly Hitchcock, Carol Cotter, Erika Bridges, Jason Schubert, Parker Mathews, Amy Milanes, Gary Melcher, Stephen Maldonado, Alyssa Halle-Schramm, Amy Albright, Leslie Whitten, and Kristen Hejny 1. Call Meeting to Order, Consider Absence Request.
Chairman Christiansen called the meeting to order at 6:16 p.m.
2. Hear Visitors
No visitors spoke.
3. Regular Agenda
3.1 Public Hearing, presentation and discussion regarding an overview of the City-wide roadway, water and wastewater impact fees.
Transportation Planning Coordinator Schubert opened the presentation on this item.
Chairman Christiansen asked for the Committee’s action responsibility on this item.
Transportation Planning Coordinator Schubert stated that this is an informational item only, and no action is requested from the Committee at this meeting.
Jeff Whitaker, Kimley-Horn, presented the impact fees overview to the Committee.
Committee Member Guerra asked why a section is being removed from the Water Service Area.
Richard Weatherly, Freese Nichols, stated that this section is excluded as part of the Municipal Utility District (MUD) agreement.
Committee Member Woodward stated that parts of area A and parts of area B are similar concentric circles in terms of impacts and asked why the City is divided into four sections.
Page 4 of 29
August 5, 2021 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3
Director of Planning and Development Services Ostrowski also stated that new annexation laws limit the City’s ability to grow, and therefore may not make financial sense to expand in some
areas.
Mr. Whitaker stated that they looked at a travel demand model and found that Texas Avenue was a natural east and west split, and Rock Prairie Road was a natural north and south split.
Committee Member Woodward asked why multi-family calculations were off.
Mr. Whitaker stated that a developer in an area may have built something different than originally projected.
Committee Member Woodward asked if the stub off William D. Fitch was necessitated or arbitrary to new development.
Mr. Whitaker stated that they are reevaluating that area now.
Committee Member Guerra asked how Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT) facilities for area B work.
Mr. Whitaker stated that they look at City’s contribution a project, which is about 10-20% on roadways.
Committee Member Guerra asked if the same should be done for all TXDOT facilities.
Mr. Whitaker stated that they are looking at all TXDOT facilities with City contribution.
Committee Member Murr asked about developers paying into impact fees.
Mr. Whitaker stated that developers will receive credits back on new roads or may have fees
credited if a road is already built.
Committee Member Guerra stated that AM peak traffic numbers are different than PM peak traffic numbers and asked if the highest trip generation is used.
Mr. Whitaker stated that they use the PM peak traffic numbers.
Committee Member Guerra requested that the City use the highest trip generation.
Mr. Whitaker stated that they can reevaluate if needed.
Chairman Christiansen stated that the Traffic Demand Model includes streets that are not on the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) model and asked if the MPO and City model agree.
Mr. Whitaker stated that they started with the MPO model and revised roadway map to match more roads than the MPO.
Committee Member Woodward asked about the multi-family collection rate.
Mr. Whitaker stated that multi-family is about two-thirds the cost of single-family.
Page 5 of 29
August 5, 2021 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3
Committee Member Woodward asked if development building in area D, which has impacts beyond area D gets counted.
Mr. Whitaker stated that state law caps service area size.
Committee Member Osborne asked for clarification on the difference between roadway impact fees and street maintenance fees.
Mr. Whitaker stated that maintenance fees are for maintenance such as potholes, and impact fees are for future growth.
Committee Member Murr asked that the Committee receive the presentation and of the LUA and IFCIP data calculations a week in advance of the September 2, 2021, IFAC meeting. Director of Planning and Development Services Ostrowski stated that staff plans to have documents ready and distributed a week prior to the meeting. 4. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items. An Impact Fee Advisory Committee Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not
been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
There was no discussion. 8. Adjourn
The meeting adjourned at 7:32 p.m. Approved: Attest: ______________________________ ________________________________ Dennis Christiansen, Chairman Kristen Hejny, Admin Support Specialist
Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services
Page 6 of 29
September 2, 2021
Item No. 5.1.
Draft land use assumptions, capital improvement plans, and roadway costing template for the
upcoming 5-year study updates of roadway, water, and wastewater impact fees
Sponsor:Jason Schubert
Reviewed By CBC:N/A
Agenda Caption:Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding draft land
use assumptions, capital improvement plans, and roadway costing template for the upcoming 5-year
study updates of roadway, water, and wastewater impact fees.
Relationship to Strategic Goals:
Core Services & Infrastructure
Diverse & Growing Economy
Recommendation(s): Staff requests feedback on the drafted items.
Summary: This item is to discuss and receive feedback regarding the draft land use assumptions
(LUA) and capital improvements plans (CIP), and roadway costing template for the 5-year study
updates of roadway, water, and wastewater impact fees.
On August 5th, the Impact Fee Advisory Committee (IFAC) received an overview of impact fees for
roadway, water, and wastewater. The City has contracted with Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. (KHA)
to perform the roadway impact fee study update and Freese and Nichols, Inc. (FNI) for the water and
wastewater impact fee study updates. Staff met with a stakeholder group on August 23rd to discuss
draft roadway impact fee documents and a summary of their feedback will be provided at the
meeting. The draft documents are scheduled to be presented to City Council on September 23rd.
Budget & Financial Summary: Budgetary implications are dependent upon the maximum
assessable fee that will be calculated from the finalized land use assumptions and CIP list, the
collection rate that City Council adopts, and the amount of development that occurs.
Attachments:
1.Roadway LUA draft
2.Water & Wastewater LUA draft
3.Roadway CIP Tracking Changes draft
4.Roadway CIP draft
5.Water & Wastewater Impact Fee CIP draft
6.Roadway Costing Template
Page 7 of 29
2021 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update 6 July 2021
City of College Station, Texas
3.ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CALCULATION INPUTS
LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS
Purpose
Impact Fees are a mechanism for funding the public infrastructure necessitated by growth. In
the most basic terms, impact fees are meant to recover the incremental cost of the impact of
each new unit of development growth creating new infrastructure needs. In order to assess
an impact fee, Land Use Assumptions must be developed to provide the basis for residential
and employment growth projections within a municipality. As defined by Chapter 395 of the
Texas Local Government Code, these assumptions include a description of changes in land
uses, densities, and development in the service area. The land use assumptions are then used
in determining the need and timing of transportation improvements to serve future
development.
The section documents the process used to develop the Land Use Assumptions for the City of
College Station Impact Fee study. In accordance with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local
Government Code, street impact fees must be calculated based on reasonable expectations
of residential and employment growth within the next ten years (2021 – 2031). The
following resources provided the information required to complete the Land Use Assumptions:
•Detailed historical building permit data
•Projected new developments and focus areas data
•Currently platted developments
•College Station Future Land Use Plan / Comprehensive Plan
•City of College Station Staff
Components of the Land Use Assumptions Chapter
The Land Use Assumptions include the following components:
1.Impact Fee Study Service Areas - Explanation of the divisions of College Station into
service areas for roadway service areas.Preliminary DraftPage 8 of 29
2021 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update 7 July 2021
City of College Station, Texas
2.Land Use Assumptions Methodology - An overview of the general methodology
used to generate the land use assumptions.
3.Ten-Year Growth Assumptions - Walk-through of the growth projections for 2021-
2031.
Impact Fee Study Service Areas
Service Area Definition
According to Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code, a Service Area refers to the area
within the corporate boundaries or extraterritorial jurisdiction of the political subdivision to
be served by the capital improvement or facilities specified in the Capital Improvement Plan.
Funds collected in the specific service areas must be spent in the service area collected.
Chapter 395 specifies that “the service area is limited to an area within the corporate
boundaries of the political subdivision and shall not exceed six (6) miles.” This resulted in the
creation of four (4) service areas in the City of College Station. There is no change from the
initial establishment of the service areas in the 2016 study except for minor changes due to
City Limit modifications.
Roadway Impact Fee Service Areas
The geographic boundaries of the four (4) impact fee service areas for roadway facilities
are shown in Exhibit 1. For roadway facilities, the service areas are limited to those areas
within the current corporate limits. Therefore, areas within the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ)
are excluded from this study.
The service areas east/west boundary is Texas Avenue, while a combination of Rock Prairie
Road, Graham Road, and Bird Pond Road compose the north/south boundaries. At locations
where service area boundaries follow a thoroughfare facility, the proposed boundary is
intended to follow the centerline of the roadway. In cases where a service area boundary
follows the City Limits, only those portions of the facility within the City Limits area are
included in the service area. Preliminary DraftPage 9 of 29
B
D
A
C
SH
6
GRAHAM ROAD NROCK PRAIRIE ROADS T
E
X
A
S
A
V
E
N
U
E
BIRD POND ROADEsri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community
Legend
City Limits
Service Areas
A
B
C
D
NExhibit 1Service Areas
July 2021
0 10.5 MilesPreliminary DraftPage 10 of 29
2021 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update 9 July 2021
City of College Station, Texas
Land Use Assumptions Methodology
The following factors were considered in developing the residential and employment
projections:
• Character, type, density, location and quantity of existing development;
• Growth trends;
• Location of vacant land;
• Future Land Use Map and Growth Areas;
• Physical restrictions (i.e. flood plains); and
• Planned development data.
The residential and employment estimates were all compiled in accordance with the following
categories:
Residential Units - Number of residential dwelling units, including single-family and
multi-family
Employment - Square feet of building area based on three (3) different
classifications. Each classification has unique trip making characteristics.
Basic - Land use activities that produce goods and services, including those
that are exported outside the local economy (i.e. manufacturing, construction,
transportation, wholesale, trade, warehousing, and other industrial uses)
Service - Land use activities which provide personal and professional services
such as government and other professional offices
Retail - Land use activities which provide for the retail sale of goods that
primarily serve households and whose location choice is oriented toward the
household sector (i.e. grocery stores and restaurants)
Preliminary DraftPage 11 of 29
2021 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update 10 July 2021
City of College Station, Texas
The above categories in the Land Use Assumptions match those used to develop the City’s
travel demand modeling and are the broader land use categories that are used in the
development of the assumptions for impact fees. In the calculation of the specific Street
Impact Fee, a more specific and expanded classification based on the Institute of
Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual will be utilized.
Growth projections for the next 10 years (2021 – 2031) for the City of College Station were
established using three data sources: known residential developments, specific focus areas,
and other City-identified infill growth areas.
Known Residential Developments
The City provided existing data for known residential developments that was used to project
for residential needs.
Specific Focus Areas
Four (4) focus areas of growth are projected to experience growth from 2021 – 2031 and
based on information from the City detailed growth projects were developed. These four
areas included University Drive East in Service Area A, Northgate and Research Valley
BioCorridor in Service Area B, and Midtown in Service Area D.
City-Identified Infill Growth Areas
The City-identified infill growth areas consist of many locations, varying in size and land use
of vacant land that would be infilled. Different land use densities or floor area ratios were
applied based on the land use classification of each development identified in the Future
Land Use Plan.
Preliminary DraftPage 12 of 29
2021 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update 11 July 2021
City of College Station, Texas
10-Year Growth Assumptions
Table 1 summarizes the growth projections by service area.
Table 1. Residential and Employment Land Use Assumptions Growth Projections (2021-2031)
Service Area Single-Family
(Units) Multi-Family
(Units) Basic
(Sq. Ft.) Service
(Sq. Ft.) Retail
(Sq. Ft.)
SA A 410 2,038 - 1,174,000 1,480,000
SA B 429 1,937 350,000 1,063,000 953,000
SA C 1,824 127 - 506,000 469,000
SA D 693 751 984,000 1,089,000 895,000
Total 3,356 4,853 1,334,000 3,832,000 3,797,000
For comparison purposes, College Station had 12,774 units of residential growth (single-
family and multi-family) and approximately 8,000,000 square feet of employment growth
(basic, service, and retail) from 2011 – 2020. College Station experienced record growth
during this time period. Based on the next ten-year growth projections within College Station
City Limits shows residential growth is projected to slow but employment is consistent.
Preliminary DraftPage 13 of 29
Land Use Assumptions
•Establishes Infrastructure Demands used in Master Plans
•Population and Housing Unit Projections obtained from projected new developments
•Coordinating with Future Land Use Plan
Page 14 of 29
Process
2021
Water
Service Area
To be removed from
Impact Fee Service Area
Impact Fee Service Area
to be reviewed by IFAC
Year LUEs Growth in
LUEs
2021 55,940 -
2031 69,824 13,884
Buildout 77,881 8,057
Page 15 of 29
Process
2021
Wastewater
Service Area
To be removed from
Impact Fee Service Area
To be added to Impact
Fee Service Area
Impact Fee Service Area
to be reviewed by IFAC
Year LUEs Growth in
LUEs
2021 58,683 -
2031 72,522 13,839
Buildout 83,280 10,758
Page 16 of 29
!
!
!
!
!
!
HARV
E
Y
MI
T
C
H
ELL
P
A
R
K
W
A
Y
S SH 6WEL
L
BORN
ROADUNIVERSITY DRIVEWILLIAM D. FITCH PARKWAYBOON
V
I
L
L
E
R
O
A
D
TE
X
A
S
A
V
E
N
U
E
S
UNIVERSITY DRIVESH
6
Legend
!
!
!
RETAIN - PROJECT IN EXISTING IMPACT FEE STUDY AND RETAINED IN UPDATED STUDY
ADDITION - PROJECT NOT IN EXISTING IMPACT FEE STUDY AND BEING ADDED WITH UPDATED STUDY
REMOVE - PROJECT IN EXISTING IMPACT FEE STUDY AND NOT RETAINED WITH UPDATED STUDY
FUTURE - OTHER THOROUGHFARE PROJECTS NOT INCLUDED IN THE UPDATED STUDY
NTracking Changes for Roadway Impact Fee
CIP - Service Area A
August 2021
0 10.5 Miles
Roadways that were removed from the Thoroughfare Plan
since 2016 do not show up on this update map but areremoved as well.Preliminary DraftPage 17 of 29
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
S
H
6
W
E
L
L
B
O
R
N
R
O
A
D
HARVEY MITCHELL PARKWAY S
SH 47
WILLIAM D. FITCH PARKWAYUNIVERSITY DRIVEUNIVER
SI
T
Y
D
RI
V
E
E
TE
X
A
S
A
V
E
N
U
E
S
RAYMOND STOTZER PARKWAY SH 6Legend
!
!
!
RETAIN - PROJECT IN EXISTING IMPACT FEE STUDY AND RETAINED IN UPDATED STUDY
ADDITION - PROJECT NOT IN EXISTING IMPACT FEE STUDY AND BEING ADDED WITH UPDATED STUD
REMOVE - PROJECT IN EXISTING IMPACT FEE STUDY AND NOT RETAINED WITH UPDATED STUDY
FUTURE - OTHER THOROUGHFARE PROJECTS NOT INCLUDED IN THE UPDATED STUDY
NTracking Changes for Roadway Impact Fee
CIP - Service Area B
August 2021
0 10.5 Miles
Roadways that were removed from the Thoroughfare Plan
since 2016 do not show up on this update map but areremoved as well.Preliminary DraftPage 18 of 29
!!
!
!
!
!
!
SH
6
W
E
L
L
B
O
R
N
R
O
A
D WILLIAM D. FITCH PARKWAYHARV
E
Y
MI
T
C
H
EL
L
P
A
R
K
W
A
Y
S
T
E
X
A
S
A
V
E
N
U
E
SSH 6Legend
!
!
!
RETAIN - PROJECT IN EXISTING IMPACT FEE STUDY AND RETAINED IN UPDATED STUDY
ADDITION - PROJECT NOT IN EXISTING IMPACT FEE STUDY AND BEING ADDED WITH UPDATED STUDY
REMOVE - PROJECT IN EXISTING IMPACT FEE STUDY AND NOT RETAINED WITH UPDATED STUDY
FUTURE - OTHER THOROUGHFARE PROJECTS NOT INCLUDED IN THE UPDATED STUDY
NTracking Changes for Roadway Impact Fee
CIP - Service Area C
August 2021
0 10.5 Miles
Roadways that were removed from the Thoroughfare Plan
since 2016 do not show up on this update map but areremoved as well.Preliminary DraftPage 19 of 29
SH
6 WILLIAM D. FITCH PARKWAYW
E
L
L
B
O
R
N
R
O
A
DHARVEY MITCHELL PARKWAY SS
H
3
0
T
E
X
A
S
A
V
E
N
U
E
SSH 6TE
X
A
S
A
V
E
N
U
E
S
Legend
!
!
!
RETAIN - PROJECT IN EXISTING IMPACT FEE STUDY AND RETAINED IN UPDATED STUDY
ADDITION - PROJECT NOT IN EXISTING IMPACT FEE STUDY AND BEING ADDED WITH UPDATED STUD
REMOVE - PROJECT IN EXISTING IMPACT FEE STUDY AND NOT RETAINED WITH UPDATED STUDY
FUTURE - OTHER THOROUGHFARE PROJECTS NOT INCLUDED IN THE UPDATED STUDY
NTracking Changes for Roadway Impact Fee
CIP - Service Area D
August 2021
0 10.5 Miles
Roadways that were removed from the Thoroughfare Plan
since 2016 do not show up on this update map but areremoved as well.Preliminary DraftPage 20 of 29
!
!
!
SH
6
TE
X
A
S UNIVERSITY HARVEYBIRD BONDDA
RTM
O
U
TH
ROCK PRAIRIESOUTHWESTCO
P
P
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
TARROWLA
S
S
I
EGEORGEBUSH
E
Legend
FUTURE THOROUGHFARE
WIDENING
PARTIAL WIDENING
CONSTRUCTED - EXCESS CAPACITY
OTHER THOROUGHFARES
!INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT - FUTURE
!INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT - EXISTING
NExhibit 2CIP - Service Area A
August 2021
0 10.5 MilesPreliminary DraftPage 21 of 29
!
!
!
!
!
!
TE
X
A
S
W
E
L
L
B
O
R
N
HA
R
V
E
Y
M
I
T
C
H
E
L
LF & B ROADHOLLEMANH
O
P
E
C
R
E
E
K GEORGE BUSHN DOWLINGSOUTH
W
EST
ROCK PR
AI
RIERAYMOND STOTZERS
H
6
ROCK P R A IRIEWUNIVERSITYCO
L
L
E
G
E
LUTHERJONES
B
UTLERT
U
R
K
E
Y
C
R
E
E
K
P
E
N
B
E
R
T
H
Y
Legend
FUTURE THOROUGHFARE
WIDENING
PARTIAL WIDENING
CONSTRUCTED - EXCESS CAPACITY
OTHER THOROUGHFARE
!INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT - FUTURE
!INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT - CONSTRUCTED
NExhibit 2CIP - Service Area B
August 2021
0 10.5 MilesPreliminary DraftPage 22 of 29
!
!
!
!
!
!
SH
6
I
-GNWELLBORNROCK PR
A
I
R
I
E
BARRONHOLLEMANW
S
P
H
I
L
L
I
P
S ARRINGTONGREENS PRAIRIEWILLIAM D FITCHR
O
Y
D
E
R
TOWE
R
S
R O C K P R A IR IE W
P
E
B
B
L
E
C
R
E
E
K
HARVEY MITCHEL L
C O R PORATE
LAKE
W
A
YN A N TU C KETCAPSTON
E TOWNLAKEMI
D
T
O
W
N
VICT
ORIAROCK P
RAI
RIE
S
H
6
W
E
L
L
B
O
R
N
SH
6
WILLIAM D FITCH
Legend
Future Thoroughfare
Widening
Partial Widening
Constructed - Excess Capacity
Other Thoroughfares
!Intersection Improvement - Future
!Intersection Improvement - Constructed
NExhibit 2CIP - Service Area C
August 2021
0 10.5 MilesPreliminary DraftPage 23 of 29
!
!
!
SH
6
ROCK PRA
I
R
I
E
WILLIAM D FITCH
PE
B
B
L
E
C
R
E
E
KBIRD PONDN A N T U CK ETC O RPORATE
LAKEWAYTOWNLAKEMI
D
T
O
W
N
SOUTHERNPOINTELegend
!INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT - FUTURE
!INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT - CONSTRUCTED
FUTURE THOROUGHFARE
WIDENING
PARTIAL WIDENING
CONSTRUCTED - EXCESS CAPACITY
OTHER THOROUGHFARES
NExhibit 2CIP - Service Area D
August 2021
0 10.5 MilesPreliminary DraftPage 24 of 29
2021 Water
Impact Fee CIP
Page 25 of 29
Process
2021 Wastewater
Impact Fee CIP
Page 26 of 29
Project Description of Project
A Royder/Live Oak Sewer Service
B Bee Creek Interceptor Phase 1, 2, and Design of 3
C Lick Creek Trunk Line
D Medical District Trunk Line Phase 1 (Participation Agreement)
E Northeast Trunk Line Phase 1, 2, and Design of 3
F Southwood Valley Trunk Line Phase 1
G Eastside Gravity Line, Lift Station, and Force Main
H Carters Creek Diversion Lift Station Phase 1
I Lick Creek WWTP Phase 1 Expansion
J Creek Meadows Lift Station Upsizing and Force Main
K Nagle Student Housing Sewer Oversize Participation
L 2021 Impact Fee Update
Project Description of Project
A High Service Pumping Improvements
B Bio-Corridor Water Line
C Area 2 Water Line Extension
D Cooling Tower Expansion
E Well No. 10 Land Acquisition
F SH 6 Water Line
G Well No. 9 and Collection Line
H Midtown Drive 12-Inch Water Line
I 3.0 MG Elevated Storage Tank and Pressure Reducing Valves
J Dowling Road Pump Station North Water Line Replacement
K The Crossing at Lick Creek Phase 1 –3 Oversize Participation
L Embassy Suites Water Line Oversize Participation
M Brazos Valley Auto Complex Oversize Participation
N Castlegate II Oversize Participation
O Greens Prairie Oversize Participation
P Summit Crossing Ph 3A Oversize Participation
Q Traditions Water Oversize Participation
R 2021 Impact Fee Study
Recently constructed improvements with
excess capacity to accommodate growth
Wastewater Impact Fee Existing CIP Water Impact Fee Existing CIP
Page 27 of 29
Project
Number Project Name
1 New and Replacement 12-inch Rock Prairie
Road Water Line
2 New 18-Inch Midtown Business Center
Water Line
3 SH 40 Water Line Extension –Graham
Road to Barron Road
4 SH 40 Water Line Extension -Sonoma
Subdivision to Victoria Avenue
5 BioCorridor Water Line Improvements
6 Water Supply Well No. 10
7 Harvey Mitchel Parkway Water Line
Replacement
Project
Number Project Name
1 30/36-Inch Northeast Interceptor Phase 3
2 27-Inch Northeast Interceptor Phase 4
3 Medical District Interceptor Phase 2
4 Hensel Park Lift Station Expansion (to 4.5 MGD) and 24-Inch Gravity Line
5 42/48-Inch Bee Creek Interceptor Phase 3
6 15/18/24/30/36-Inch Southwood Valley Interceptor Phase 2
7 Lick Creek WWTP Phase 2 Expansion (to 8.0 MGD)
8 Replacement 18/21-Inch Alum Creek Trunk Line
9 New and Replacement 18-Inch Alum Creek Trunk Line
10 8-Inch Creek Meadows Force Main Re-Routed to Alum Creek Trunk Line
11 Medical District Interceptor Phase 3
12 21/24-Inch Harvey Road Replacement Gravity Line
13 Eastside Lift Station Expansion (to 1.3 MGD)
Wastewater Impact Fee Proposed CIP Water Impact Fee Proposed CIP
Page 28 of 29
City of College Station Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
2021 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update updated:8/19/2021
Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection
Project Information:Description:Project No.11
Name:Example Minor ArterialLimits:ONE MILEImpact Fee Class:4 LANE MINOR ARTERIAL
Length (lf):5,280Service Area(s):TBD
Roadway Construction Cost Projection
No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost
109 Unclassified Street Excavation 21,120 cy 9.00$ 190,080$
209 8" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 36#/sy)41,067 sy 7.00$ 287,467$
309 Reinforced Concrete Pavement with Integral Curb 38,720 sy 65.00$ 2,516,800$ 409 4" Topsoil 15,840 sy 4.00$ 63,360$
509 6' Concrete Sidewalk 63,360 sf 6.00$ 380,160$ 609 Turn Lanes and Median Openings 4,987 sy 72.00$ 359,040$
Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:3,796,907$
Major Construction Component Allowances**:Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost
√Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%189,845$ √Pavement Markings/Signs/Posts Includes Striping/Signs for Bicycle Facilties 3%113,907$
√Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 25%949,227$ √Illumination 6%227,814$
Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0%-$
√Water Minor Adjustments 3%113,907$
√Sewer Minor Adjustments 2%75,938$ √Landscaping and Irrigation 4%151,876$
Miscellaneous:$0 -$
**Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,822,515$
Paving and Allowance Subtotal:5,619,422$ Construction Contingency:15%842,913$
Mobilization 5%280,971$ Prep ROW 3%168,583$ Construction Cost TOTAL:6,912,000$
Impact Fee Project Cost Summary
Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost
Construction:- 6,912,000$
Engineering/Survey/Testing:12%829,440$ Previous City contribution
OtherROW/Easement Acquisition:TBD -$
Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:7,741,000$
This project consists of the construction of a 4-lane
minor arterial.
NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future
Capital Improvement Planning within the City of College Station.
The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project.
2021 Roadway Impact Fee Study
City of College Station, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost ProjectionsPreliminary DraftPage 29 of 29