Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZoning Reconsidered 020905ange Reconsidered . By PAT LESTER Eagle Staff Writer W. D. Fitch of Area Progress Corp. withdrew his request for rezoning Lots B and C, section 11 of the Glade Addition Mon- day night at the College Station City Council meeting after residents of the subdivision expressed their disapproval of the proposed zoning change. However, Fitch said, "I don't think the area we picked for townhouse units would devalue the property on Laura Lane or even Glade Street provided E there is adequate access. 1 "The problem really is one r of traffic. All the traffic in that end of town unfortunately has a to go up Glade Street." The subdivision residents contended that the zoning change from single family dwelling district to apartment house district would devalue their property. According to Roger G. Feldman of 1304 Glade St., spokesman for the subdivision residents "The majority of Vestal of 1503 Laura Lane, "With the growth of the university, we are going to need apartments. I urge the City Council to plan for this growth - properly zoned without in- fringing upon the people who have invested in relatively expensive residences." Vestal suggested that the City Council "draw up a master plan where the community knows where commercial, apartments and residences will be located." In other business involving rezoning, the council rezoned Lots 1-9, Bock 23 of the Boyett Addition from second dwelling house district to apartment house district. Charles F. Hall of 511 Nagle St. said, "Apartments should go in this area (north College Station). But I think when areas are to be rezoned for apart- ments or dwellings of this type, the city has the responsibility to see that the streets are adequate, or are made (See ZONING, Page 3) people who live in that par- -t I ticular area of College Station (Continued From Page 1) live there because it was adequate, for the increase in represented to them as an area traffic and to see that the of restricted residendes." drainage is adequate for the I Fldman also emphasized 'hat increase in run off that results. Feldman also emphasized that "The City has not accepted v Separating Lots B and C f- { `N N•+G.msidencru ' ua 1 this responsibility in the past. ) O One only has to look at Nagle 1 a - 111 01 aoop s uo3 p0ou ~i3aP L' sl 0 19 C Street to see that." e - 111 9Aarlaq 0M„ lsur> ` . Mayor D. A. (Andy) Anderson U 1. : slsanbai ,xj aallai{}nd ; replied, "There are two str,Pets 0 N ' ' C 1aIA ur:,: ; 111 P a that have high priority in next r 0 ' ' t; x111 Io IIL" e ' ` - lua gaeas pal I ar ua:. y s street improvement L V aid. 4ed Zq Aeugfs ratjar W them. Also, the City Council voted iV' to call public hearings on E 'rezoning tracts one and two of D Al Culpepper Plaza from first M business district to apartment 28 house district and amending the Sl t zoning ordinance by adding a C. o neighborhood business district. to I "A neighborhood business T( di i str ct would have more restrictions imposed upon it 1 and, therefore, would not be a 7 fully commercial district, as C- o 1, Mayor Anderson com- t, mented. a In other business, the City f, Council opened bids on two fire h n trucks which were referred to City Manager Ran Boswell for study and consideration. a - The bids were as follows: bi Ward La France, $73,950; Mack to Truck Inc., $64,800 and $66,800 W for the alternate; Fire Trucks ai Inc., $73,170.76; Houston Fire l and Safety Equipment Co., th $69,976; and American Fire V , „ Aparatus Co., $75,527.60. Finally, the Councilmen ap- If, proved the West Knoll Cr preliminary plat, the street design for the 29th Street ex- C tension and the Cemetery . Committee recommendations s J for bhe beautification of the I. College Station City Cemetery. I 4 1rfrll ('art.. Fi rnirnd f!,