Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/06/2020 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning CommissionCollege Station, TX Meeting Agenda Planning and Zoning Commission Phone: 888 475 4499 and Webinar ID: 989 5690 3862 Internet: https://zoom.us/j/98956903862 The City Council may or may not attend the Planning & Zoning Commission Regular Meeting. August 6, 2020 6:00 PM 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77840 College Station, TX Page 1 1.Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request. 2.Hear Visitors. Speaker Protocol: An individual who wishes to address the Commission regarding any item on the  Regular Agenda, shall register with the Commission Secretary prior to 4 p.m. on the day of the  meeting. To register, the individual must provide a name and phone number by calling 979.764.3751  or emailing khejny@cstx.gov prior to 4 p.m. To submit written comments to the Commission, email  khejny@cstx.gov and they will be distributed to the Commission. Upon being called to speak, an  individual must state their name and city of residence, including the state of residence if the city is  located out  of  state. Speakers  are  encouraged  to  identify  their College Station  neighborhood  or  geographic  location. Each  speaker's  remarks  are  limited  to  three  (3)  minutes.  Any  speaker  addressing the Commission through the use of a translator may speak for six (6) minutes. At the  three (3) minute mark, the Commission Secretary will announce that the speaker must conclude their  remarks.  3.Informational Agenda 3.1.Discussion of  new  development applications submitted to  the  City.  New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev 3.2.Discussion of Minor /  Amending Plats approved by staff: Lakeview Acres Phase  II, Block  1, Lots  1A  &  2A  ~  Case #FPCO2020-000007 (Rodriguez) Chimney Hill Retail Plaza Block 1, Lot 2R1A ~ Case #FPCO2020­000002 (Bridges) Brewster Pointe Subdivision Phase I, Block 1, Lot 1R & Common Area 1R and Block 3, Lot 1A­R ~ Case #FP2019­000025 (Stickles) 3.3. Presentation and discussion regarding an update on items heard: A Rezoning for approximately seven acres located at 14565 & 14575 FM 2154 from R Rural to PDD Planned Development District. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on March 5, 2020, and voted (7­0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on July 9, 2020, and voted (6­0) to approve the request. 3.4.Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, BioCorridor  Board, Comprehensive Plan Evaluation Committee. Planning and Zoning Commission Page 2 August 6, 2020 3.5.Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: Thursday, August 13, 2020 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Virtual Meeting ~ See Agenda for Meeting Times (Liaison - Mather) Thursday, August 20, 2020 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Virtual Meeting ~ 6:00 p.m. Thursday, August 27, 2020 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Virtual Meeting ~ See Agenda for Meeting Times (Liaison - Christiansen) Friday, August 28, 2020 ~ City Council / P&Z Joint Meeting ~ 9:00 a.m. ~ CSU Meeting & Training Facility, 1601 Graham Road Thursday, September 3, 2020 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Virtual Meeting ~ 6:00 p.m. 4.Consent Agenda All matters listed under the Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Commission and will be  enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans and final plats, where staff has found  compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved  with any and all staff recommendations. Since there will not be separate discussion of these items,  citizens wishing to address the Commission regarding one or more items on the Consent Agenda  may address the Commission at this time as well. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on  the Consent Agenda it may be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration.  4.1.Consideration, discussion and possible action to approve meeting minutes.  Attachments:1.July 2 2020 4.2.Presentation, discussion,  and possible action  regarding  an  extension of  Preliminary  Plan  approval for the Antioch Community Church subdivision, generally located between Holleman  Drive South and Towers Parkway. Case #PP2018­000010 Sponsors:Jesse Dimeolo Attachments:1.Staff Report 2.Vicinity Map, Aerial, Small Area Map 3.Approved Preliminary Plan for Antioch Community Church 4.Antioch Community Church PP extension letter 4.3.Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a Final Plat for Winding Creek Estates  Phase 2 on approximately 21.8 acres generally located east of the intersection of Stousland  Road  and  Rolling Meadow  Drive,  in  the  College  Station  Extraterritorial  Jurisdiction.  Case  #FP2019-000011 Sponsors:Ciarra Greer Attachments:1.Staff Report 2.Vicinity Map, Aerial, Small Area Map 3.Final Plat Planning and Zoning Commission Page 3 August 6, 2020 4.4.Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a Final Plat for Winding Creek Estates  Phase  3  on  approximately  24.9  acres  generally located  northeast  of  the intersection of  Stousland Road and Rolling Meadow Drive, in the College Station Extraterritorial Jurisdiction.  Case #FP2019­000017 Sponsors:Ciarra Greer Attachments:1.Staff Report 2.Vicinity, Aerial, Small Area Map 3.Final Plat 5.1.Public Hearing, presentation, discussion and possible action regarding an ordinance amending  Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance, “Article 4, Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official  Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the  zoning  district boundary  from  T  Townhouse  to  PDD  Planned Development  District  on  approximately 4 acres located at 3914 Alamosa Street, generally located west of Harvey Road  and South of Summit Crossing Lane. Case # REZ2020­000005 (Note: Final action of this item  will be considered at the August 27, 2020 City Council Meeting – Subject to change). Sponsors:Jesse Dimeolo Attachments:1.Staff Report 2.Vicinity Map, Aerial and Small Area Map 3.Rezoning Exhibit 4.Background Information 5.Applicant's Supporting Information 6.Rezoning Map 7.Concept Plan 6.Consideration, discussion, and  possible action  on  items  removed  from  the Consent Agenda by Commission action. 7.Discussion and possible action on future agenda items. A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A  statement  of  specific factual  information  or  the  recitation  of existing  policy  may  be  given. Any  deliberation  shall  be  limited  to  a proposal  to place  the  subject  on  an  agenda  for  a  subsequent  meeting.  8.Adjourn The Planning and Zoning Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed  on the agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion.  I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted at College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue,  College Station, Texas, on July 31 2020 at 5:00 p.m.  5.Regular Agenda Planning and Zoning Commission Page 4 August 6, 2020  City Secretary This  building  is  wheelchair  accessible.  Persons  with  disabilities  who  plan  to  attend  this meeting    and    who    may    need    accommodations,    auxiliary    aids,    or    services    such    as interpreters,   readers,  or  large  print  are  asked  to  contact  the  City  Secretary’s  Office  at  (979) 764­3541,  TDD   at  1­800­735­2989,  or  email  adaassistance@cstx.gov  at  least  two  business days  prior  to  the   meeting   so   that   appropriate  arrangements   can   be   made.   If   the   City   does  not   receive   notification  at  least  two  business  days  prior  to  the  meeting,  the  City  will  make  a reasonable  attempt to provide the necessary accommodations. Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun. "Pursuant  to  Section  30.07,  Penal  Code  (Trespass  by  License  Holder  with  an  Openly  Carried     Handgun)     A     Person     Licensed     under     Subchapter     H,     Chapter     411,  Government   Code   (Handgun   Licensing   Law),   may   not   enter   this   Property   with   a  Handgun that is Carried Openly."  Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia. “Conforme  a  la  Seccion  30.07 del  codigo  penal  (traspasar  portando  armas  de  mano al    aire   libre   con   licencia),   personas   con   licencia   bajo   del   Sub-Capitulo   H,   Capitulo  411,  Codigo  de  Gobierno  (Ley  de  licencias  de  arma  de  mano),  no  deben  entrar  a  esta  propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.” July 2, 2020 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 4 MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting July 2, 2020 6:00 p.m. Phone: 888 475 4499 and Webinar ID: 940 2655 1712 Internet: https://zoom.us/j/94026551712 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Dennis Christiansen, Jeremy Osborne, Elizabeth Cunha, Joe Guerra, Bobby Mirza, Bill Mather COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Paul Gunnels COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Linda Harvell CITY STAFF PRESENT: Jennifer Prochazka, Molly Hitchcock, Carol Cotter, Erika Bridges, Anthony Armstrong, Jason Schubert, Alma Guerra, Alyssa Halle-Schramm, Jesse DiMeolo, Treston Rodriguez, Carla Robinson, Robin Macias and Kristen Hejny 1. Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request. Chairman Christiansen called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 2. Hear Visitors No visitors spoke. 3. Consent Agenda 3.1 Consideration, discussion and possible action to approve meeting minutes. • June 18, 2020 Commissioner Osborne motioned to approve the Consent Agenda. Commissioner Mather seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). Regular Agenda 4. Consideration, discussion and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission Action. No items were removed from the Consent Agenda. 5. Informational 5.1 Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev Page 5 of 39 July 2, 2020 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 4 There was no discussion. 5.2 Discussion of Minor / Amending Plats approved by staff. • Amending Plat ~ Mission Ranch Phase 102 ~ Case #FP2020-000018 (DiMeolo) • Minor Plat ~ West Park Addition Block 1, Lots 1-R1 & 1-R2 ~ Case #FP2020-000001 (Rodriguez) 5.3 Presentation and discussion regarding pattern zoning and the City of Bryan Midtown Area Plan. Long Range Planning Administrator Halle-Schramm presented this item to the Commission. Commissioner Cunha asked if using pre-approved building plans, permit approval can be done in a few days, how long is the permitting process if not using pre-approved plans. Long Range Planning Administrator Halle-Schramm stated that there is typically a two day turn around for building plan review on pre-approved plans, however, new designs may take longer with several rounds of reviews. Commissioner Guerra asked if the overlay area is redevelopment area. Long Range Planning Administrator Halle-Schramm confirmed that this is a redevelopment area containing both residential and commercial area. Commissioner Guerra asked if the existing residents in that area are ok with the plan, and if this area is primarily a rental district. Long Range Planning Administrator Halle-Schramm stated that a market study was performed within the plan. Ms. Halle-Schramm further stated that the City does not have statistics regarding occupied/not occupied homes in the area, however, the City of Bryan conducted four public workshops, providing surveying opportunities, where public input was requested on each district. Chairman Christiansen stated that the boundary of study is the City of College Station city limits, asking how the City of College Station is coordinating. Mr. Christiansen also asked if there is an anticipated pattern zoning application in College Station. Long Range Planning Administrator Halle-Schramm stated that the City of College Station did have a representative serve on the area plan committee, further stating that a pattern zoning application can be considered. 5.4 Presentation and discussion regarding an update on items heard: • A Rezoning of approximately 33 acres located at 5604 Rock Prairie Road from R Rural to PDD Planned Development District. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on June 18, 2020 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on June 25, 2020, and voted (6-0) to approve the request. There was no discussion. Page 6 of 39 July 2, 2020 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 4 5.5 Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: • Thursday, July 9, 2020 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Virtual Meeting ~ Workshop & Regular – see Council agenda for start times (Liaison – Osborne) • Thursday, July 16, 2020 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Virtual Meeting ~ 6:00 P.M. • Thursday, July 23 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Virtual Meeting ~ Workshop & Regular – see Council agenda for start times (Liaison – Mirza) • Thursday, August 6, 2020 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Virtual Meeting ~ 6:00 p.m. There was no discussion. 5.6 Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, BioCorridor Board, Comprehensive Plan Evaluation Committee. There was general discussion. 6. Regular Agenda 6.1 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a Final Plat for West Park Addition Lots 2-R1 & 2-R2, being a replat of West Park Addition Lot 2-R on approximately 0.33 acres located at 303 Luther Street. Case #FP2020-000009 Staff Planner DiMeolo presented the Final Plat to the Commission, recommending approval. Chairman Christiansen opened the public hearing. No one spoke. Chairman Christiansen closed the public hearing. Commissioner Osborne motioned to approve the Final Plat. Chairman Christiansen seconded the motion, the motion passed (6-0). 7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items – A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. Commissioner Cunha requested a refresher on ministerial items, and Commission’s purview on items in the City’s extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ). Assistant City Manager Prochazka stated that the Commission has purview on ministerial and ETJ plats. Adjourn The meeting adjourned at 6:42 p.m. Approved: Attest: Page 7 of 39 July 2, 2020 P&Z Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 4 ______________________________ ________________________________ Dennis Christiansen, Chairman Kristen Hejny, Admin Support Specialist Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services Page 8 of 39 Planning & Zoning Commission August 6, 2020 Scale 1 lot on approximately 8.2 acres Location Generally between Holleman Drive South and Towers Parkway, located at 3197 Holleman Drive South. Property Owner Antioch Community Church of CS Applicant Schultz Engineering LLC Project Manager Jesse DiMeolo, Staff Planner jdimeolo@cstx.gov Project Overview A preliminary plan for one lot zoned R Rural and GS General Suburban. Preliminary Plan Originally approved September 6, 2018 Public Infrastructure Capital Improvement Project ST1607 was under construction at the time of review. This includes a sidewalk along the western property line (adjacent to Holleman Drive South). Parkland Dedication Not required Traffic Impact Analysis Not required Compliant with Comprehensive Plan (including Master Plans) and Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Yes Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes, a waiver was granted to block length and street projection requirements. Staff Recommendation According to Section 3.4.E.1.d.3 of the UDO, the Planning and Zoning Commission may extend the approval of a Preliminary Plan for a one- time additional twelve-month period. This must be requested by the applicant at least 30 days before the Preliminary Plan approval expires. The expiration date is September 6, 2020. Staff recommends approval of the 12-month extension. Supporting Materials 1.Vicinity Map, Aerial, and Small Area Map 2.Previously Approved Preliminary Plan 3.Antioch Community Church extension letter 12-month extension of Approved Preliminary Plan for Antioch Community Church at 3197 Holleman Dr. S PP2018-000010 Page 9 of 39 Page 10 of 39 Page 11 of 39 Page 12 of 39 HOLLEMAN DRIVE SOUTHBABY BEAR DRIVE TOWERS PARKWAYPUBLIC ALLEY 3GUNNER TRAIL8.181 AC. BLOCK 2 LOT 1 COMMON AREA0.05 ACRES LOT 2 LOT 3 LOT 4 BLOCK 3 COMMON AREA 0.10 ACRES LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 LOT 4 LOT 5 LOT 6 LOT 7 LOT 8 LOT 9 LOT 10PROPOSED DRIVEWAYLOT 1BLOCK 1 TBPE NO. 12327911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840  (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER: PRELIMINARY PLAN ANTIOCH COMMUNITY CHURCH SUBDIVISION 8.181 ACRES CRAWFORD BURNETT LEAGUE, A-7 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS SURVEYOR: McCLURE & BROWNEENGINEERING /SURVEYING, INC. 1008 WOODCREEK DR., SUITE 103COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 (979) 693-3838 SCALE: 1" = 40'AUGUST 2018 OWNER/DEVELOPER: ANTIOCH COMMUNITY CHURCH OF CS 1803 BRIARCREST DR.BRYAN, TX 77802 (979) 229-2899 PRELIMINARY PLAN NOT FOR RECORD LOT 1, BLOCK 1 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE HOLLEMAN DR IVE SOUTH TO W E R S P A R K W A Y GU N N E R T R A I L DEACON DRIVE WESTBABY BEAR DRIVEF:\________18-627 Antioch Church Barracks\PRELIMINARY PLAN\18-627 PRELIMINARY PLAN.dwg, Layout1September 6, 2018 Page 13 of 39 Page 14 of 39 Planning & Zoning Commission August 6, 2020 Scale 11 single-family lots and 2 common areas on approximately 21.8 acres Location Generally located west of the existing Saddle Creek Subdivision Property Owner Wellborn Winding Creek, LLC Applicant Schultz Engineering, LLC Project Manager Ciarra Greer, Planning Technician cgreer@cstx.gov Project Overview The proposed subdivision is located within the City of College Station Extraterritorial Jurisdiction as part of the Winding Creek Estates Preliminary Plan consisting of 87 lots and common area on approximately 145 acres. The proposed final plat is the second of six planned phases within the Winding Creek Subdivision. Preliminary Plan April 2019 Public Infrastructure Total linear feet proposed: 1933 Streets (Brazos County) 554 Storm Sewers (Brazos County) 2105 Water Lines (Wellborn SUD) Parkland Dedication $625 per single-family lot will be required at the time of Final Plat Traffic Impact Analysis Not required Compliant with Comprehensive Plan (including Master Plans) and Unified Development Ordinance Yes Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes Staff Recommendation Approval Supporting Materials 1. Vicinity Map, Aerial, and Small Area Map 2. Final Plat Final Plat for Winding Creek Estates Phase 2 FP2019-000011 Page 15 of 39 Page 16 of 39 Page 17 of 39 Page 18 of 39 R O L L I N G M E A D O W D R I V E LOT 14 LOT 16 LOT 19 FF=258.0 LOT 15 FF=258.0 1.265 AC. 1.546AC. 1.049 AC. 1.005 AC.LOT 38 LOT 42 LOT 78LOT 79 LOT 81 LOT 82 FF=259.0 FF=259.0 FF=262.0 FF=259.0 FF=260.0 FF=260.0 LOT 39 LOT 40 LOT 41 LOT 80 FF=258.0 FF=260.0 ROL L I N G M E A D O W D R I V E COMMONAREA 1 FF=262.0BENDING BRANCHDRIVESILENT BROOK COURT ROLLING M E A D O W D R I V E LOT 37 FF=259.0 ROL L I N G M E A D O W D R I V E BLOCK 2 BLOCK 4 BLOCK 4 BLOCK 4 BLOCK 2 1.877 AC. 1.026 AC. 1.023 AC. 1.449 AC. 1.495 AC. 1.151 AC. 1.015 AC. 1.328 AC. 1.578 AC. 1.275 AC. 1.891AC. COMMONAREA 2 FF=259.0 1.745 AC. 1.299AC. LEGEND TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.College Station, Texas 77840 (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER: FINAL PLAT WINDING CREEK ESTATES PHASE 2 21.810 ACRES J.C. STUTEVILLE SURVEY, A-216 BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS 11 LOTS BLOCK 4, LOTS 37-42 BLOCK 2, LOTS 78-82 COMMON AREAS 1 & 2 SURVEYOR: Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave.Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 SCALE 1'' = 100'JUNE 2020 OWNER/DEVELOPER: Wellborn Winding Creek, LLC 3000 Briarcrest Drive, Suite 302 Bryan, TX 77802 (281) 642-4924 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE WE L L B O R N R D METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION OF ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE J. C. STUTEVILLE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 216, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS. SAID TRACTBEING A PORTION OF THE REMAINDER OF A CALLED 31.915 ACRE TRACT AS DESCRIBED BY A DEED TO WELLBORN WINDING CREEK, LLC, RECORDED IN VOLUME 14161, PAGE 110 OF THE OFFICIALPUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, A PORTION OF THE REMAINDER OF A CALLED 50.00 ACRE TRACT AS DESCRIBED BY A DEED TO WELLBORN WINDING CREEK, LLC RECORDED INVOLUME 14429, PAGE 38 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, A PORTION OF A CALLED 10.65 ACRE TRACT DESCRIBED AS TRACT 1 AND A PORTION OF A CALLED 50.10 ACRE TRACTDESCRIBED AS TRACT 2 BY A DEED TO WELLBORN WINDING CREEK, LLC, RECORDED IN VOLUME 14484, PAGE 126 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS. SAID TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP MARKED “KERR 4502” FOUND ON A WESTERLY LINE OF SAID REMAINDER OF 50.00 ACRE TRACT MARKING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 19,BLOCK 2, WINDING CREEK ESTATES, PHASE 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 15161, PAGE 134 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID IRON RODFOUND BEING ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF ROLLING MEADOW DRIVE (100' R.O.W.). COORDINATES AND BEARING SYSTEM SHOWN HEREIN ARE NAD83 (TEXAS STATE PLANE CENTRAL ZONE GRIDNORTH) BASED ON THE PUBLISHED COORDINATES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION GEODETIC CONTROL STATION 14RQU5945778027 MON 4 (N:10771032.038, E:3567536.952) AND AS ESTABLISHEDFROM GPS OBSERVATION. DISTANCE SHOWN HEREIN ARE GRID DISTANCES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. TO OBTAIN SURFACE DISTANCES MULTIPLY BY A COMBINED SCALE FACTOR OF1.00007571045057 (CALCULATED USING GEOID 12B). THENCE: N 83° 58' 51" E ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF ROLLING MEADOW DRIVE FOR A DISTANCE OF 2.35 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP MARKED “KERR 4502” FOUND; THENCE: N 06° 01' 09" W ACROSS THE PLATTED END OF ROLLING MEADOW DRIVE FOR A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP MARKED “KERR 4502” FOUND; THENCE: THROUGH SAID REMAINDER OF 50.00 ACRE TRACT, SAID 10.65 ACRE TRACT, SAID 50.10 ACRE TRACT AND SAID REMAINDER OF 31.915 ACRE TRACT FOR THE FOLLOWING CALLS: N 09° 06' 51” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 258.33 FEET; N 75° 31' 44” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 30.15 FEET; N 87° 47' 06” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 34.92 FEET; N 20° 09' 50” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 221.15 FEET; N 49° 31' 39” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 450.48 FEET; S 25° 10' 40” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 45.57 FEET; S 33° 05' 33” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 60.12 FEET; S 60° 42' 38” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 76.61 FEET; N 74° 18' 14” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 38.97 FEET; N 08° 19' 57” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 97.07 FEET; N 29° 34' 51” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 90.24 FEET; N 28° 41' 26” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 109.20 FEET; N 45° 45' 32” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 294.11 FEET; S 22° 51' 11” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 301.70 FEET; N 67° 08' 49” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 105.00 FEET; N 22° 51' 11” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 166.18 FEET; N 65° 12' 46” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 242.07 FEET; S 23° 22' 59” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 274.61 FEET; S 34° 53' 01” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 187.76 FEET; S 66° 32' 51” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 85.20 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CLOCKWISE CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 797.50 FEET; ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02° 02' 36” FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 28.44 FEET (CHORD BEARS: N 23° 52' 29” W - 28.44 FEET) TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; N 22° 51' 11” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 21.09 FEET; S 67° 08' 49” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 105.00 FEET; S 22° 51' 11” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 21.09 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A COUNTERCLOCKWISE CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 902.50 FEET; ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16° 57' 41” FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 267.17 FEET (CHORD BEARS: S 31° 20' 01” E - 266.20 FEET) TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; S 66° 59' 02” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 96.81 FEET; S 63° 27' 57” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 13.77 FEET; S 85° 44' 43” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 42.28 FEET; S 05° 54' 58” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 12.28 FEET; S 13° 02' 45” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 24.72 FEET; S 24° 10' 32” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 63.62 FEET; S 32° 02' 17” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 50.62 FEET; S 13° 20' 48” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 57.69 FEET; S 06° 20' 15” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 65.77 FEET; S 00° 20' 15” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 47.21 FEET; S 29° 27' 55” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.93 FEET; S 46° 03' 54” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 110.09 FEET; S 60° 15' 41” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 31.09 FEET; S 87° 05' 28” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 21.42 FEET; N 85° 53' 52” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 44.92 FEET; S 59° 13' 02” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 45.57 FEET; S 22° 23' 32” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 28.38 FEET; S 12° 51' 09” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 41.66 FEET S 02° 43' 44” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 18.58 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 14, BLOCK 2, WINDING CREEK ESTATES, PHASE 1; THENCE:ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID REMAINDER OF 31.915 ACRE TRACT, SAID REMAINDER OF 50.00 ACRE TRACT AND WINDING CREEK ESTATES, PHASE 1, FOR THE FOLLOWING CALLS: S 78° 27' 28” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 123.70 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP MARKED “KERR 4502” FOUND; N 53° 55' 43” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 89.89 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP MARKED “KERR 4502” FOUND; S 51° 00' 57” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 258.63 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP MARKED “KERR 4502” FOUND; S 78° 33' 12” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 257.52 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP MARKED “KERR 4502” FOUND; N 06° 01' 09” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 204.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING CONTAINING 21.810 ACRES OF LAND, AS SURVEYED ON THE GROUND. Page 19 of 39 LEGEND ROLLING MEADOW DRIVE ROLLING MEADOW DRIVE TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.College Station, Texas 77840 (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER: FINAL PLAT WINDING CREEK ESTATES PHASE 2 21.810 ACRES J.C. STUTEVILLE SURVEY, A-216 BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS 11 LOTS BLOCK 4, LOTS 37-42 BLOCK 2, LOTS 78-82 COMMON AREAS 1 & 2 SURVEYOR: Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave.Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 SCALE 1'' = 100'JUNE 2020 OWNER/DEVELOPER: Wellborn Winding Creek, LLC 3000 Briarcrest Drive, Suite 302 Bryan, TX 77802 (281) 642-4924 INSET "A" 1" = 40' INSET "B" 1" = 40' INSET "C" 1" = 20' INSET "D" 1" = 20' INSET "E" 1" = 20' Page 20 of 39 Planning & Zoning Commission August 6, 2020 Scale 18 single-family lots on approximately 24.9 acres Location Generally located west of the existing Saddle Creek Subdivision Property Owner Wellborn Winding Creek, LLC Applicant Schultz Engineering, LLC Project Manager Ciarra Greer, Planning Technician cgreer@cstx.gov Project Overview The proposed subdivision is located within the City of College Station Extraterritorial Jurisdiction as part of the Winding Creek Estates Preliminary Plan consisting of 87 lots and common area on approximately 145 acres. The proposed final plat is the third of six planned phases within the Winding Creek Subdivision. Preliminary Plan April 2019 Public Infrastructure Total linear feet proposed 2068 Streets (Brazos County) 327 Storm Sewers (Brazos County) 359 Water Lines (Wellborn SUD) Parkland Dedication $625 per single-family dwelling unit will be required at the time of Final Plat Traffic Impact Analysis Not required Compliant with Comprehensive Plan (including Master Plans) and Unified Development Ordinance Yes Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes Staff Recommendation Approval Supporting Materials 1. Vicinity Map, Aerial, and Small Area Map 2. Final Plat Final Plat for Winding Creek Estates Phase 3 FP2019-000017 Page 21 of 39 Page 22 of 39 Page 23 of 39 Page 24 of 39 ROLLING MEADOW DRIVERAIN MEADOW DRIVE LOT 1 LOT 19 LOT 15 1.020 AC. 1.546AC. 1.005 AC. STOUSLAND ROAD RAIN MEADOW DRIVE RAIN MEADOW DRIVEAPRIL VISTA COURTLOT 28 LOT 43LOT 44 BLOCK 3LOT 45LOT 46LOT 47LOT 48LOT 49BLOCK 3LOT 51 LOT 50 LOT 27BLOCK 4 LOT 20BLOCK 4 LOT 21 LOT 22 LOT 26 FF=262.0FF=262.0 1.000 AC.1.003 AC.1.001 AC.1.005 AC.1.003 AC.1.004 AC.1.005 AC.1.003 AC.1.004 AC. 1.398 AC. 1.019 AC. 1.241AC.BIG TRAILLOT 42 LOT 81 LOT 82 LOT 39 LOT 40 LOT 41 LOT 80 BLOCK 4 BLOCK 4 BLOCK 2 1.026 AC. 1.023 AC.1.449 AC. 1.151 AC. 1.015 AC. 1.578 AC. 1.275 AC.SILENT BROOK COURTROLLING MEADOW DR IVE 1.312 AC.1.883 AC. 1.177 AC. FF=269.0 FF=269.0 FF=263.0 LOT 23 LOT 24 LOT 25 1.191 AC. 1.293 AC. 1.089 AC. FF=266.0 LEGEND RAIN MEADOWDRIVE LOT 44 LOT 21 TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.College Station, Texas 77840 (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER: FINAL PLAT WINDING CREEK ESTATES PHASE 3 BLOCK 4, LOTS 20-28 BLOCK 3, LOTS 43-51 24.938 ACRES J.C. STUTEVILLE SURVEY, A-216 BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS 18 LOTS SURVEYOR: Brad Kerr, RPLS No. 4502 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave.Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 SCALE 1'' = 100'JULY 2020 OWNER/DEVELOPER: Wellborn Winding Creek, LLC 3000 Briarcrest Drive, Suite 302 Bryan, TX 77802 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE WE L L B O R N R D INSET "A" 1" = 30' EXISTING PHASE LINE METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION OF ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE J. C. STUTEVILLE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 216, BRAZOS COUNTY,TEXAS. SAID TRACT BEING A PORTION OF THE REMAINDER OF A CALLED 50.00 ACRE TRACT AS DESCRIBED BY A DEED TO WELLBORN WINDING CREEK, LLC RECORDED IN VOLUME 14429, PAGE39 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, A PORTION OF THE REMAINDER OF A CALLED 10.65 ACRE TRACT DESCRIBED AS TRACT ONE AND A PORTION OF THEREMAINDER OF A CALLED 50.10 ACRE TRACT DESCRIBED AS TRACT TWO BY A DEED TO WELLBORN WINDING CREEK, LLC RECORDED IN VOLUME 14484, PAGE 126 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLICRECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS. SAID TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP MARKED “KERR 4502” FOUND ON THE EAST LINE OF STOUSLAND ROAD AND THE NORTH LINE OF ROLLING MEADOW DRIVE (100' R.O.W.)MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WINDING CREEK ESTATES, PHASE 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 15161, PAGE 134 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOSCOUNTY, TEXAS. FOR REFERENCE A CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND ON THE EAST LINE OF STOUSLAND ROAD MARKING AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID LINE BEARS: S 06° 01' 09” E FOR A DISTANCEOF 1027.86 FEET. COORDINATES AND BEARING SYSTEM SHOWN HEREIN ARE NAD 83 (TEXAS STATE PLAIN CENTRAL ZONE GRID NORTH) BASED ON THE PUBLISHED COORDINATES OF THE CITYOF COLLEGE STATION GEODETIC CONTROL STATION 14RQU5945778027 MON 4 (N:10771032.038, E:3567536.952) AND AS ESTABLISHED FROM GPS OBSERVATION. DISTANCES SHOWN HEREIN AREGRID DISTANCES. TO OBTAIN SURFACE DISTANCES MULTIPLY BY A COMBINED SCALE FACTOR OF 1.00007571045057 (CALCULATED USING GEOID 12B). THENCE: N 06° 01' 09” W ALONG THE EAST LINE OF STOUSLAND ROAD FOR A DISTANCE OF 1470.23 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THIS HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT; THENCE: THROUGH SAID REMAINDER OF 50.10 ACRE TRACT, SAID REMAINDER OF 10.65 ACRE TRACT AND SAID REMAINDER OF 50.00 ACRE TRACT FOR THE FOLLOWING CALLS: N 84° 11' 46” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.77 FEET; S 50° 54' 41” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 35.42 FEET; N 83° 58' 51” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 6.68 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CLOCKWISE CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 335.00 FEET; ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 23° 50' 50” FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 139.43 FEET (CHORD BEARS: S 84° 05' 44” E - 138.43 FEET) TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; S 72° 10' 19” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 142.62 FEET; N 64° 39' 19” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 34.21 FEET; S 68° 31' 04” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 70.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CLOCKWISE CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 265.00 FEET; ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06° 10' 27” FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 28.56 FEET (CHORD BEARS: N 24° 32' 48” E - 28.54 FEET) TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; S 62° 21' 59” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 402.06 FEET; S 38° 39' 07” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 181.40 FEET; S 25° 24' 23” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 76.51 FEET; S 53° 09' 11” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 117.19 FEET; S 36° 08' 32” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 107.33 FEET; S 25° 10' 40” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 39.85 FEET; S 49° 31' 39” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 450.48 FEET; S 20° 09' 50” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 221.15 FEET; S 87° 47' 06” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 34.92 FEET; S 75° 31' 44” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 30.15 FEET; S 09° 06' 51” E FOR A DISTANCE OF 258.33 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP FOUND MARKED “KERR 4502” FOUND ON THE NORTH LINE OF ROLLING MEADOW DRIVE MARKINGTHE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THIS HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT; THENCE: ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF ROLLING MEADOW DRIVE FOR THE FOLLOWING CALLS: S 83° 58' 51” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 262.01 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP MARKED “KERR 4502” FOUND; N 51° 01' 09” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 35.36 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP MARKED “KERR 4502” FOUND; S 83° 58' 51” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 70.00 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP MARKED “KERR 4502” FOUND; S 38° 58' 51” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 35.36 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP MARKED “KERR 4502” FOUND; S 83° 58' 51” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 238.33 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP MARKED “KERR 4502” FOUND; N 51° 03' 30” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 35.33 FEET TO A ½ INCH IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC CAP MARKED “KERR 4502” FOUND; S 83° 58' 51” W FOR A DISTANCE OF 30.48 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING CONTAINING 24.938 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, AS SURVEYED ON THE GROUND. Page 25 of 39 August 6, 2020 Regular Agenda Rezoning – Summit Crossing Ph 3B & 3C PDD To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Jesse DiMeolo, Staff Planner Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, discussion and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance, “Article 4, Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from T Townhouse to PDD Planned Development District on approximately 4 acres located at 3914 Alamosa Street, generally located west of Harvey Road and South of Summit Crossing Lane. Case # REZ2020-000005 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the August 27, 2020 City Council Meeting – Subject to change). Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request and associated concept plan. Summary: The applicant has proposed a PDD Planned Development District with a base zoning of GS General Suburban for approximately 4 acres located in the Summit Crossing Subdivision. The rezoning from T Townhouse to PDD is intended to address changes in the market and provide small-lot single- family homes intended as starter homes for families. REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map designates the subject property as Urban. The Comprehensive Plan generally describes urban land uses as areas with a very intense level of development activities that tend to consist of townhomes, duplexes, and high- density apartments. The applicant is proposing a base zoning of GS General Suburban with modifications to setbacks and lots widths to remain consistent with the dense residential land uses identified in the urban designation of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of the surrounding area: The subject property is adjacent to PDD Planned Development District zoning to the southwest that allows townhomes and duplexes, R Rural to the west, parkland and open space to the east that was dedicated to the City as Summit Crossing Park, and T Townhouse to the north. Much of the surrounding property is previous phases of the Summit Crossing Subdivision that consists of townhomes and duplexes. The proposed PDD zoning, allowing for small-lot, single-family detached homes, is compatible with the neighboring residential uses. 3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district: The applicant is proposing to rezone approximately 4 acres that are primarily located on Alamosa Street and Buena Vista. These areas are part of the larger Summit Crossing development and are suitable for development, fitting into the surrounding neighborhood and having access to Harvey Road. Page 26 of 39 4. Whether there is available water, sanitary sewer, storm water, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district: Water and sanitary sewer service are provided by the City of College Station. Water, sanitary sewer, drainage and transportation infrastructure were constructed with the previous phases of Summit Crossing. No new utility lines will be needed with this development. Due to the change from the more dense T Townhouse zoning to a GS General Suburban base zoning, there will be a decrease in anticipated water and sewer demands from the development than were previously accounted for and acceptable. Likewise, the anticipated traffic demand is a decrease from the originally proposed T Townhouse zoning. 5. The marketability of the property: The property can be marketed under the current zoning of T Townhouse which allows for denser single-family attached residences. The applicant is requesting the PDD to allow for small-lot detached single-family homes with the intent of marketing these as affordable starter homes for families. REVIEW OF CONCEPT PLAN The Concept Plan provides an illustration of the general layout of the proposed building areas as well as other site related features. In proposing a PDD, an applicant may also request variations to the general platting and site development standards provided that those variations are outweighed by demonstrated community benefits of the proposed development. The Unified Development Ordinance provides the following review criteria as the basis for reviewing PDD Concept Plans: 1.The proposal will constitute an environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding area; 2.The proposal is in conformity with the policies, goals, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, and any subsequently adopted Plans, and will be consistent with the intent and purpose of this Section; 3.The proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not adversely affect adjacent development; 4.Every dwelling unit need not front on a public street but shall have access to a public street directly or via a court, walkway, public area, or area owned by a homeowners association; 5.The development includes provision of adequate public improvements, including, but not limited to, parks, schools, and other public facilities; 6.The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 7.The development will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use and other uses reasonably anticipated in the area considering existing zoning and land uses in the area. Purpose, Intent and Community Benefit: The City’s Comprehensive Plan establishes the intent of this area developing as an urban environment with an intense level of density for residential development that places residents in close proximity to Page 27 of 39 commercial corridors along Harvey Road and FM 158. The applicant proposes the following enhancements in exchange for the requested modifications listed in the next section. Comparable densities to townhouse development will be required to meet the qualifications of the urban land use designation. The proposed PDD rezoning will result in approximately 9 dwelling units per acre compared to 10.75 dwelling units per acre for the current T townhouse zoning. This provides a density higher than the maximum allowed for GS General Suburban (8 dwelling units per acre) and slightly less than the current density of 10.75 dwelling units per acre. Another proposed community benefit is that each lot will be required to have a two car garage and a driveway minimum geometry of 18 feet wide by 20 feet deep. This will help meet the future parking demands of the community. Base Zoning District: The PDD Planned Development District zoning includes the following base zoning district and all requirements associated with the base zoning district shall apply except where specifically modified herein. The PDD Planned Development District zoning includes base zoning district of GS General Suburban with modifications (for the areas highlighted in the Concept Plan) to realize the high density, single-family residential proposal. Modifications: The requested modifications are as follows: Section 12-5.2 Residential Dimensional Standards o Modifications to the General Suburban standards for the PDD Planned Development District area. GS Proposed PDD Min. Lot Width 50’40’ Min. Front Setback(H)25’20' Min. Side Setback 7.5’5' Max. Dwelling Units/Acre 8 9 Floodplain & Detention: This tract of land does not lie within the FEMA floodplain. Existing detention was constructed with the initial phase of Summit Crossing to adequately discharge site runoff to pre-development runoff rates. This proposed development will capture surface runoff and convey it, via existing underground storm sewer systems, to the existing detention facilities. Parkland: Parkland consisting of 8.81 acres was dedicated to the City of College Station in neighborhood park phase one of the Summit Crossing development, volume 9490, page 296. No additional land dedication is proposed with the PDD. Page 28 of 39 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the PDD Planned Development District rezoning request and associated Concept Plan. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Vicinity, Aerial, and Small Area Map 2.Rezoning Exhibit 3. Background Information 4. Applicant’s Supporting Information 5. Rezoning Map 6. Concept Plan Page 29 of 39 Page 30 of 39 Page 31 of 39 Page 32 of 39 Page 33 of 39 BACKGROUND INFORMATION NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: August 6, 2020 Advertised Council Hearing Date: August 27, 2020 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: Summit Crossing HOA Property owner notices mailed: 39 Contacts in support: None at the time of this report Contacts in opposition: None at the time of this report Inquiry contacts: Seven at the time of this report ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North Urban T Townhouse Undeveloped South Urban PDD Planned Development District Townhomes East Urban T Townhouse and MF Multi Family Undeveloped West Urban R Rural Undeveloped DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: 1980 Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open upon annexation Rezoned from A-O to PDD Planned Development District (2003) Rezoned from PDD to T Townhouse (2016) Final Plat: FP2016-000043 (Phase 3B, Block 3) FP2016-000044 (Phase 3C, Blocks 4-6) Site development: Summit Crossing Phase 3B, Block 3 is undeveloped Summit Crossing Phase 3B, Blocks 1, 2, and 4 have townhomes under construction Summit Crossing Phase 3C, Blocks 4-6 are undeveloped Page 34 of 39 REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION SUMMIT CROSSING – PHASE 3B & 3C Page - 1 REQUIRED INFORMATION: AREA CONDITIONS: List the changed or changing conditions in the area, or in the City, which make this zone change necessary. The desired zoning would change the use of the proposed property from Townhomes – Single-Family (attached) to Single-Family (detached). COMPATIBILITY: How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood? This use and nature of development would conform to existing developments within the Summit Crossing development areas. Density of the proposed area will be similar in nature, Urban in nature, and consistent with the remainder of the Summit Crossing subdivision. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. Yes. The current Townhome zoning has a base districts of Urban. The proposed zoning change would accommodate high-density residential that is comparable in nature and style. REZONING SUITABILITY: Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested. This type of development is a compatible fit for the existing uses adjacent and comparable to the surrounding existing developments. CURRENT SUITABILITY: Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. Provide affordable “starter” homes for single-family uses. PROPERTY MARKETABILITY: Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. Provide affordable “starter” homes for single-family uses. OTHER REASONS: List any other reasons to support this zone change. The proposed PD Zoning and Concept Plan will generate the following desirable conditions and are as follows: (1) High-density Single-Family (attached) and consistent and supported by the existing infrastructure; (2) accommodate development similar in characteristic to the surrounding Summit Crossing subdivision and provide transitional zoning to neighboring developments (single-family to Multi- family, Office & Retail which are located within the regional area); Page 35 of 39 REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION SUMMIT CROSSING – PHASE 3B & 3C Page - 2 CONCEPT PLANS: BUILDING HEIGHTS: Provide the range of future building heights. Conform with Single-Family (detached) residential standards. PROPOSED DRAINAGE: Provide a general statement regarding the proposed drainage. Existing detention was provided/construction with the initial phase to adequately discharge site runoff to pre-development runoff rates. This proposed development will capture surface runoff and convey it, via underground storm sewer systems, to the existing detention facilities. VARIOUS SOUGHT: List the general bulk or dimensional variations sought. Setbacks Single-Family Land Uses – Areas designated as single family detached shall conform to General Suburban zoning district land uses and all dimensional standards with the following exceptions:  Minimum front setback reduced from 25’ to 20’.  Minimum side setback reduced from 7.5’ to 5’.  Minimum lot width of 40’. COMMUNITY BENEFITS: If variations are sought, please provide a list of community benefits and/or innovative design concepts to justify the request. The following additional enhancements are proposed in exchange for the requested modifications:  Comparable densities with the approved Townhomes (single family-attached) to Single Family-detached with an actual density of 10.75 dwelling units per acre to approximately 9 DU/acre.  Attached and/or detached two car garages are required with each dwelling unit. SUSTAINED STABILITY: Explain how the concept plan proposal will constitute an environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding area. This use and nature of development will generally conform to existing development that is adjacent. CONFORMITY: Explain how the proposal is in conformity with the policies, goals, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Page 36 of 39 REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION SUMMIT CROSSING – PHASE 3B & 3C Page - 3 Same as “Sustained Stability”. COMPATIBILITY w/USE: Explain how the concept plan proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not adversely affect adjacent development. Same as “Sustained Stability”. ACCESS TO STREETS: State how dwelling units shall have access to a public street, if they do not front on a public street. Full access will be provided via Buena Vista, Alamosa Street & Summit Crossing Ln. These streets have access to Harvey Road East (SH 30). PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: State how the development has provided adequate public improvements, including, but not limited to parks, schools, and other public facilities. Water and sanitary sewer is currently constructed and is provided by the City of College Station. PUBLIC HEALTH: Explain how the concept plan proposal will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Same as “Sustained Stability”. SAFETY: Explain how the concept plan proposal will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use and other uses reasonably anticipated in the area considering existing zoning and land uses in the area. The total peak generation, anticipated for this project, is approximately 37.7 trips/hour. This is well within the capacity of the surrounding roadway infrastructure. Page 37 of 39 Page 39 of 39