Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/14/2018 - Regular Agenda Packet - Design Review BoardDesign Review Board September 14, 2018 11:00 AM City Hall Administrative Conference Room 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas AGENDA DESIGN REVIEW BOARD September 14, 2018 11:00 AM Administration Conference Room 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas, 77840 The City Council may or may not attend the Design Review Board meeting. 1.Call to Order. 2. Consideration, discussion and possible action to approve meeting minutes. •July 13, 2018 3.Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve Absences from Meetings: •Katherine Cabrera ~ September 14, 2018 4. Presentation, possible action, and discussion to consider Alternative Compliance to theUnified Development Ordinance Section 7.10 Non-Residential Architectural Standards for the City of College Station Police Annex located at 800 Krenek Tap Road. Case# NRA2018- 00047 (A. Helton) 5.Possible action and discussion on future agenda items – A Design Review Board Membermay inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specificfactual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 6. Adjourn. I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted at College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on September 7, 2018 at 5 p.m. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS By________________________________ City Secretary This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters, readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations. Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder With an Openly Carried Handgun. “Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (trespass by license holder with an openly carried handgun), a person licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (handgun licensing law), may not enter this property with a handgun that is carried openly” Codigo Penal §30.07. Trespasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia. “Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre” Minutes Design Review Board July 13, 2018 11:00 AM Administrative Conference Room 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas, 77840 Board Members Present: Jane Kee, William McKinney, Ray Holliday, Jesse Durden, Valerian Miranda, Katherine Cabrera Board Members Absent: Susan McGrail Staff Present: Planning Administrator Justin Golbabai, Senior Planner Justin Constantino, Staff Assistant Crystal Derkowski AGENDA ITEM NO. 1: Call to order. Chairperson Kee called the meeting to order at 11:01 a.m. AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Consideration, discussion and possible action to approve meeting minutes. •April 27, 2018 Board member Durden motioned to approve with the revision of the meeting minutes with the last sentence on Agenda Item No. 4 stating that the minimum height for standing seams should be changed from 2 inches to 1½ inches. Board member McKinney seconded the motion, which passed (5-0). Commissioner Valerian Miranda was absent for this vote. AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Consideration, discussion and possible action to approve absences from meetings. •Susan McGrail ~ July 13, 2018 Board member Cabrera motioned to approve the absence. Board member McKinney seconded the motion, which passed (5-0). Commissioner Valerian Miranda was absent for this vote and came in as we started Agenda Item No.4. AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Presentation, possible action, and discussion to consider Alternative Compliance to the Unified Development Ordinance Section 7.10 Non-Residential Architectural Standards for 707 Texas Avenue Building D. located at 707 Texas Avenue Building D. Case# NRA2018-000030 (J. Constantino) Senior Planner Constantino presented the item to the Board. He stated that the applicant is requesting an alternative compliance to the UDO Non-Residential Architectural Standards. The applicant presented the plans for the building and discussed the type of material that would be used for the building. There was general discussion amongst the Board regarding the look and type of materials that were proposed. Board Member Miranda motioned to approve the request with a change to Façade E, to raise the hardie panel above the top of the windows. Board Member Durden seconded the motion which passed (6-0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 5: Possible action and discussion on future agenda items – A Design Review Board Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. There were no items presented. AGENDA ITEM NO. 6: Adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 11:23 pm. APPROVED: _________________________________ Jane Kee, Chairperson ATTEST: _________________________________ Tiffany Romero, Staff Assistant Absence Request Form For Elected and Appointed Officers Name Katherine Cabrera Request Submitted on 8/31/2018 I will not be in attendance at the meeting of September 14, 2018 for the reason(s) specified: (Date) Work Commitment TR-Via email Design Review Board September 14, 2018 Page 1 of 6 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD For City of College Station Police Annex 800 Krenek Tap Road NRA2018-000047 REQUEST: Alternative compliance to the Non-Residential Architectural Standards LOCATION: 800 Krenek Tap Road ZONING DISTRICT: GS General Suburban APPLICANT: PGAL Architects PROJECT MANAGER: Alaina Helton, Senior Planner ahelton@cstx.gov Design Review Board September 14, 2018 Page 2 of 4 Design Review Board September 14, 2018 Page 3 of 4 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITY As stated in Section 7.10.A of the Unified Development Ordinance, the intent of the Non-Residential Architectural Standards is to: 1)Protect and enhance the character and quality of non-residential buildings andassociated site elements in the interest of the general welfare of the City; 2)Establish minimum design parameters for the appearance of non-residential buildings, including heightened standards for more visible and prominent areas of the community; 3)Not limit architectural creativity or prescribe a specific architectural style; and4)Provide a balance between the community’s economic and aesthetic concerns. The Unified Development Ordinance grants the Design Review Board (DRB) the authority to hear and decide proposals for alternative compliance to the Non-Residential Architectural Standards. Specifically, Section 7.10.D states: The Design Review Board (DRB) may authorize variation to the overall requirements of the Non-Residential Architectural Standards through application from a licensed architect for an alternative compliance approval that would allow innovative or visually interesting design or to address unique circumstances not otherwise permitted through strict adherence to this section. Such requests must show reasonable evidence that the purposes of the requirements as set forth in this section were maintained and the additional design flexibility afforded does not provide a means to permit design of lesser quality. Based on these criteria, the Design Review Board can act upon the proposed request in one of the following ways: 1)Approve the request as proposed2)Approve the request with conditions3)Deny the request ITEM SUMMARY: PGAL Architects are requesting an alternative compliance approval to the overall requirements of the Non-Residential Architectural Standards by seeking to demonstrate that the provided architectural relief elements and building materials are more functional due to the unique nature of the building. CRITERIA: In order to promote quality construction and visually interesting non-residential structures, the UDO specifies minimum architectural standards that include building materials and architectural elements to achieve this goal. While 800 Krenek Tap Road meets some of the requirements, not all elements are compliant with adopted standards. The reasoning for the non-compliant features as highlighted by the applicant are described in more detail below. As the intent of the Design Review Board’s alternative compliance process is to offer an approval option that allows architects and the Board the ability to discuss overall visions and individual design decisions, dialog is not limited to non-compliant design elements. The architect for the project has provided a letter regarding the request, which is attached to this report. These elevations were also presented to City Council on January 11, 2018, for discussion, and Council approved the overall concept and design of the facility as presented today. Design Review Board September 14, 2018 Page 4 of 4 Architectural Relief In order to provide visual interest, the primary façade or façade visible from a public right-of-way must use at least one (1) architectural relief element for every twenty-five (25) horizontal feet of façade length. The applicant believes that the addition of architectural elements to the Annex would draw unwanted public attention to the structure. Roofline Design The horizontal line of a flat roof or parapet along primary entrance façades, facades facing a public street classified as a minor arterial or greater on the Thoroughfare Plan, or façades visible from a public street must vary a minimum of two (2) feet up or down where no more than 66% of the roof line is on the same elevation. The elevation for the Annex submitted by the applicant does not show the required roofline articulation. The applicant states that the Annex is a private and secure building designed for utilitarian purposes and storage and is not meant to be visible to the public or meant to attract public attention. For this reason, the design is kept minimal with a low roof pitch and a 6-foot opaque security fence obscuring public view. Building Materials Facades visible from a public right-of-way must provide a minimum of 10% brick, stone, marble, granite or any concrete product that integrates color and texture/pattern that simulates brick, stone, marble or granite. Wood or cedar siding, stainless steel, chrome, standing seam metal, premium grade architectural metal, or architecturally finished metal panels (not corrugated metal) shall not cover more than 30 percent of any façade. The Annex has two facades visible from a public right-of-way (Dartmouth Street) that do not provide the minimum and maximum material requirement as required. To maintain a sense of material quality, the applicant has proposed that a portion of the building which is visible to passing traffic is constructed of brick. OPTIONS: •Approve the proposed designs and materials •Approve with conditions •Deny SUPPORTING MATERIALS: 1. Application2.Letter from Architect3. Elevations COCS POLICE HEADQUARTERS ANNEX (CIP) (NRA2018-000047) 800 KRENEK TAP RD; Additional Properties: Building Elevations The Building Elevations include the primary building being the Police Headquarters and the Annex Building. See attached letter for Alterntaive Compliance request. Building Materials A list of Building Materials for all facades and screening are shown on the plans. See attached letter for Alterntaive Compliance request. Color Samples NRA Checklist The NRA Checklist will be attached. APPLICANT:PGAL Architects (Austin) OWNER:City of College Station Alternative Compliance Requested Renderings provide overall concept of color scheme. September 5, 2018 Alaina Helton Senior Planner City of College Station Planning & Development Services PO Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 Alaina Helton, This is a letter of intent stating the reasons why the architectural design of the City of College Station Police Headquarters and Annex should be granted Alternative Compliance. The design of the Police Headquarters utilizes several of the Architectural Relief Elements required by the UDO such as roofline articulations, wall plane projections with a minimum of four-foot depth, and a well-defined cornice. However, many of the elements defined in the UDO such as, canopies, decorative awning, balconies, and boxed or bay windows are not appropriate design elements for a police headquarters building. Due to this, we relied on Section 7.10.10.A.10 of the UDO which states that “Other architectural relief elements that provide a visual interest to the affected façade and are of a physical scale to possess architectural significance may be approved by the Administrator.” To add visual interest to the design, we used decorative window lintels and sills, a stone watertable and cap, wing walls, multiple methods of brick articulation, detailed entrance columns, and material changes to create a detailed, interesting, and resolved architectural design. The Annex is a private and secure building designed for utilitarian purposes and storage and is not meant to be visible to the public or meant to attract public attention. The addition of architectural elements to the Annex would draw unwanted public attention to the structure. For this reason, the design is kept minimal with a low roof pitch and a 6’ opaque security fence obscuring public view. To maintain a sense of material quality, the portion of the building which is visible to passing traffic is constructed of brick. Sincerely, Cris Ruebush, AIA, LEED AP Principal COLLEGE STATION POLICE HEADQUARTERS CODE ANALYSIS BUILDING CODE 2015 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE MECHANICAL CODE 2015 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE PLUMBING CODE 2015 INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE ELECTRIC CODE 2014 NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE FIRE CODE 2015 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE ENERGY CODE 2015 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION (IBC SECTION 302): NON-SEPARATED MIXED USE (IBC SECTION 508.3) A-3 ASSEMBLY B BUSINESS S-1 MODERATE-HAZARD STORAGE S-2 LOW-HAZARD STORAGE U UTILITY CONSTRUCTION TYPE (IBC TABLE 601): TYPE IIB, NON-COMBUSTIBLE, UNPROTECTED ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT (IBC TABLE 504) & AREA (IBC TABLE 503): OCCUPANCY TYPE A-3 B S-1 S-2 U TYPE IIB 2 STORIES / 9,500 S.F. 3 STORIES / 23,000 S.F. 2 STORIES / 17,500 S.F. 3 STORIES / 26,000 S.F. 2 STORIES / 8,500 S.F. INCREASE FOR SPRINKER 1 STORY / 19,000 S.F. 1 STORY / 46,000 S.F. 1 STORY / 35,000 S.F. 1 STORY / 52,000 S.F. 1 STORY / 17,000 S.F. INCREASE FOR FRONTAGE 6,460 S.F. 17,250 S.F. 13,125 S.F. 19,500 S.F. 6,375 S.F. TOTAL 34,960 S.F. 84,640 S.F. 64,400 S.F. 95,680 S.F. 31,280 S.F. HEIGHT MODIFICATIONS (IBC SECTION 504): SECTION 504.2 AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM INCREASE H = 20 FT AND THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF STORIES IS INCREASED BY ONE STORY MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED FOR TYPE IIB CONSTRUCTION = 55 FT MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED WITH SPRINKLER SYSTEM = 75 FT FRONTAGE INCREASE (IBC SECTION 506): I(f) = ([F / P] -.25) x (W / 30) I(f) = ([906.5' / 964.5') -.25] x (30 / 30) I(f) = 0.68 TYPE IIB FIRE RESISTANCE RATING REQUIREMENTS FOR EXTERIOR WALLS (IBC TABLE 602): BUILDING ELEMENT FIRE RESITANCE RATING (IN HOURS) FIRE PROTECTION BUILDING DESIGN INFORMATIONCODE ANALYSIS STAIRWAYS (IBC SECTION 1009) EXIT ACCESS STAIRWAY ENCLOSURES SHALL HAVE A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 2 HOURS WHERE CONNECTING FOUR STORIES OR MORE, AND NOT LESS THAN 1 HOUR WHERE CONNECTING LESS THAN FOUR STORIES. 2 STORY BUILDING 1 HOUR RATED EXIT ACCESS STAIRWAY ENCLOSURE PROJECT INFORMATION BUILDING ADDRESS OWNER ADDRESS PROJECT DATA PROJECT LOCATION PRIMARY STRUCTURAL FRAME BEARING WALLS EXTERIOR INTERIOR NON-BEARING WALLS AND PARTITIONS INTERIOR FLOOR CONSTRUCTION AND ASSOCIATED SECONDARY MEMBERS ROOF CONSTRUCTION AND ASSOCIATED SECONDARY MEMBERS 0 0 0 0 0 0 REQUIRED SEPARATION OF OCCUPANICES (IBC TABLE 508.4) OCCUPANICES A-3 AND B A-3 AND S-1 A-3 AND S-2 A-3 AND U B AND S-1 B AND S-2 U AND S-2 SPRINKLERED 1-HOUR 1-HOUR NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED 1-HOUR NOT REQUIRED NON-SPRINKLERED 2-HOUR 2-HOUR 1-HOUR 1-HOUR NOT REQUIRED 2-HOUR NOT REQUIRED OCCUPANCY CALCULATIONS POLICE BUILDING OCCUPANCY TYPE FUNCTION OF SPACE FLOOR AREA LOAD FACTOR TOTAL LOAD LEVEL 1 ASSEMBLY (A-3)EXERCISE ROOM 2,312 S.F.50 46 UNCNCNTRTD ASSEMBLY 1,783 S.F.15 119 BUSINESS (B)BUSINESS 22,036 S.F.100 261 LOCKER ROOM 2,997 S.F.50 58 MECHANICAL 1,690 S.F.300 12 STORAGE (S-1)STORAGE 3,826 S.F.300 15 SEPARATION OF INCIDENTAL USES (IBC TABLE 509): STATIONARY STORAGE BATTERY SYSTEMS HAVING A LIQUID ELECTROLYTE CAPACITY OF MORE THAN 50 GALLONS FOR FLOODED LEAD-ACID, NICKEL CADMIUM OR VRLA, OR MORE THAN 1,000 POUNDS FOR LITHIUM- ION AND LITHIUM METAL POLYMER USED FOR FACILITY STANDBY POWER, EMERGENCY POWER OR UNINTERRUPTABLE POWER SUPPLIES -1 HOUR IN GROUP B, F, M, S, AND U OCCUPANCIES; 2 HOURS IN GROUP A, E, I, AND R OCCUPANCIES. LEVEL 2 BUSINESS (B)BUSINESS 23,482 S.F.100 278 MECHANICAL 810 S.F.300 6 LEVEL 1 TOTAL OCCUPANCY = 512 ANNEX BUILDING OCCUPANCY TYPE FUNCTION OF SPACE FLOOR AREA LOAD FACTOR TOTAL LOAD ASSEMBLY (A-3)EXERCISE ROOM 1,271 S.F.50 26 UNCNCNTRTD ASSEMBLY 448 S.F.15 30 BUSINESS (B)BUSINESS 111 S.F.100 2 STORAGE (S-1)STORAGE 2,531 S.F.300 9 UTILITY (U)PARKING GARAGE 6,129 S.F.200 36 ANNEX TOTAL OCCUPANCY = 107 LEVEL 2 TOTAL OCCUPANCY = 285 TOTAL OCCUPANCY = 797 MEANS OF EGRESS CALCULATIONS PER IBC CHAPTER 10 MEANS OF EGRESS: EXIT WIDTH CALCULATION FOR STAIRWAYS WITH SPRINKLER SYSTEM: OCCUPANDT LOAD 285 EGRESS WIDTH FACTOR .2" TOTAL EGRESS WIDTH (IN) 57" TOTAL EGRESS WIDTH (FT) 4' 9" TOTAL STAIRWAY WIDTH PROVIDED 8'-0" TOTAL STAIRWAYS PROVIDED 2 @ 4'-0" EXIT WIDTH CALCULATION FOR OTHER EGRESS COMPONENTS WITH SPRINKLER SYSTEM: OCCUPANDT LOAD 285 EGRESS WIDTH FACTOR .15" TOTAL EGRESS WIDTH (IN) 42.75" TOTAL EGRESS WIDTH (FT) 3' 8.75" TOTAL EGRESS WIDTH PROVIDED 6'-0" TOTAL EGRESS COMPONENTS PROVIDED 2 EGRESS DRS @ 3'-0" NOTES: 1.EGRESS REQUIREMENTS SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN REQUIRED BY 2015 IBC AND ELSWHERE AS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE CODE, INCLUDING TEXAS ACCESSIBLIITY STANDAREDS (TAS). IN THE EVENT OF DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN CODES, COMPLY WITH THE MORE RESTRICTIVE REQUIRMENT IN ALL CASES. 2.MEANS OF EGRESS DOORS SHALL MEET THE REQUIRMENTS OF THE 2015 IBC AND TAS. DOORS PROVIDED FOR EGRESS PURPOSES IN NUMBERS GREATER THAN REQUIRED BY CODE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THESE SECTIONS. 3. PROJECTIONS INTO THE REQUIRED EGRESS CLEAR OPENING WIDTH, INCLUDING HANDRAILS, SHALL COMPLY WITH IBC SECTION 1003.3.3 AND TAS NOT TO EXCEED 4" BETWEEN 27" AND 80" ABOVE THE FLOOR OR GROUND. 4.EGRESS STAIRWAYS AND HANDRAILS SHALL COMPLY WITH IBC 2018 AND WITH CHAPTER 4 OF THE TEXAS ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS. PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNT MINIMUM NUMBER OF REQUIRED PLUMBING FACILITIES PER CHAPTER 29, TABLE 2902.1 CLASSIFICATION ASSEMBLY A-3 USE GROUP BUSINESS B WATER CLOSETS MALE WATER CLOSETS FEMALE LAVATORIES MALE LAVATORIES FEMALE DRINKING FOUNTAINS SHOWERS 1 PER 125 1 PER 65 1 PER 200 1 PER 200 1 PER 500 - 1 PER 25 FOR FIRST 50 AND 1 PER 50 FOR THE REMAINDER EXCEEDING 50 1 PER 40 FOR THE FIRST 80 AND 1 PER 80 FOR THE REMAINDER EXCEEDING 80 1 PER 100 STORAGE S-1 S-2 1 PER 100 1 PER 1,0001 PER 100 - - OCCUPANCY TOTAL REQUIRED MEN W.C. TOTAL REQUIRED WOMEN W.C. TOTAL REQUIRED MEN LAV. TOTAL REQUIRED WOMEN LAV. TOTAL REQUIRED DRINKING FNTN A-3 B S-1 POLICE BUILDING 1 8 2 5 1 1 1 785 1 1 111 TOTALS 21 14 9 OCCUPANCY TOTAL MEN W.C. PROVIDED TOTAL WOMEN W.C. PROVIDED TOTAL MEN LAV. PROVIDED TOTAL WOMEN LAV. PROVIDED TOTAL DRINKING FNTN PROVIDED TOTALS 35 28 10 TOTAL SHOWER PROVIDED TOTAL SHOWER REQUIRED 9 2611 TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 (979) 764-3601) POLICE HEADQUARTERS 63,633 G.S.F. LEVEL 1 37,392 G.S.F. LEVEL 2 26,241 G.S.F. ANNEX 11,008 G.S.F. TOTAL 74,641 G.S.F. PARKING REQUIREMENTS PER COLLEGE STATION UDO ARTICLE 7.3.H POLICE HEADQUARTERS REQUIRED PARKING PARKING REQUIRED FOR OFFICE BUILDINGS: 1.0 SPOTS PER 250 G.S.F 63,633/250 = 255 PARKING SPACES ANNEX REQUIRED PARKING PARKING REQUIRED FOR WAREHOUSES: 1.0 SPOTS PER 1,000 G.S.F. 11,008/1,000 = 12 TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED -267 TOTAL PROVIDED -314 - - - - PLUMBING INFORMATION APPLICABLE CODES: 800 KRENEK TAP RD COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 POLICE HEADQUARTERS 100% SPRINKLERED BUILDING, WET PIPE SYSTEM ANNEX UNSPRINKLERED MATERIAL BR-01 BRICK COLOR BR-02 STONE RED-BROWN; EXACT COLOR TBD PER MANUFACTURER CREME; EXACT COLOR TBD PER STONE SUPPLIER RF-01 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF CS-01 CAST STONE COLORED TO MATCH BR-02 MD-01 METAL DOOR DESCRIPTION MD-02 OVERHEAD METAL DOOR GREY; EXACT COLOR TBD PER MANUFACTURER GREY; EXACT COLOR TBD PER MANUFACTURER MP-01 MR-01 METAL BUILDING PANEL METAL BUILDING ROOF GREY; EXACT COLOR TBD PER MANUFACTURER GREY; EXACT COLOR TBD PER MANUFACTURER PROJECT MATERIALS AND COLORS CS-02 PRE-CAST CONCRETE WALL CREME; EXACT COLOR TBD PER MANUFACTURER COLOR TBD PER MANUFACTURER EXACT COLORS ARE NOT PROVIDED AT THIS TIME BECAUSE SPECIFIC BRICK AND STONE MATERIALS HAVE NOT BEEN SELECTED. DESIGN INTENT FOR ALL COLORS AND MATERIALS IS SHOWN IN THE EXTERIOR RENDERINGS PROVIDED. COLOR NOTE: CHRISTOPHER RUEBUSH TX20946 THIS DOCUMENT IS RELEASED FOR INTERIM REVIEW UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, BIDDING, PERMIT, OR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES. INTERIM REVIEW www.pgal.com TBPE REG. No. F-2742 PGAL FILE NAME:PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT NAME SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE REGISTRATION DRAWING HISTORY CONSULTANT ARCHITECT CLIENT DATE STAMP: PROJECT NUMBER City of College Station Notes/Approval: 2222 Western Trails Blvd Suite #300 Austin, TX 78745 T (512) 236-1005 C:\@RevitLocals\A-CSPD-1003086_R18_Central Model_WBurger.rvt8/1/2018 8:52:23 AMA-BR 1.00 CODE SHEET College Station Police Headquarters 800 Krenek Tap Rd College Station, TX 77840 College Station PD T (979) 764-3601 Copyright © 2018 2611 Texas Avenue South, College Station, TX 77840 1003086KRENEK TAP RDDARTMOUTH ST№. DATE DESCRIPTION 1 08/01/2018 NRA BUILDING REVIEW ROLLING GATE, SECURITY CHECKPOINT MECH YARD PRE-CAST SECURITY WALL CHAIN LINK FENCE PRE-CAST SECURITY WALL PROPERTY LINE & SETBACK NORTH TRUE 0 60'90'120'30' Graphic Scale: 1 inch = 30 feet CENTRAL PARK CSPD BUILDING DARTMOUTH ST.KRENEK TAP RD.DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE; BR01 ANNEX BUILDING A D A EXISTING CITY SIDEWALK, TYP. PERIMETER OF SITE ROLLING GATE, SECURITY CHECKPOINT 362' PRE-CAST WALL229' PRE-CAST WALL 161' CHAIN LINK FENCE275' C H AIN LIN K F E N C E 209' CHAIN LINK FENCE 163'-5 5/8" PRE-CAST WALL2 1/8" / 1'-0" 5 3' P R E - C A S T WA L L COVERED LOADING AREA A D A A D A ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA A2 A1 ANNEX GROUND LEVEL 263'-0" ANNEX ROOF 281'-0" 1 A7.02 SITE SOUTH 262'-6" 60'-4"18'-0"6"PRE-FINISHED METAL BUILDING R-PANEL SIDING; MP01 PRE-FINISHED METAL BUILDING STANDING SEAM MTL ROOF; MR01 AAABADAFAH ANNEX GROUND LEVEL 263'-0" ANNEX ROOF 281'-0" SITE SOUTH 262'-6" AG 2 A7.02 AE AC 21'-9"25'-9"26'-0"16'-0"32'-0"29'-8"26'-0"6"18'-0"OVERHEAD MTL DOOR; COLOR TBD PER MANUFACTURER PRE-FINISHED METAL BUILDING R-PANEL SIDING; MP01 PRE-FINISHED METAL BUILDING STANDING SEAM MTL ROOF; MR01 BRICK VENEER; BR01 METAL DOOR; MD01 AA AB AD AF AH ANNEX GROUND LEVEL 263'-0" ANNEX ROOF 281'-0" SITE SOUTH 262'-6" AG 2 A7.02 AEAC 21'-9"25'-9"26'-0"16'-0"32'-0"29'-8"26'-0"18'-0"6"OVERHEAD MTL DOOR; MD02 PRE-FINISHED METAL BUILDING R-PANEL SIDING; MP01 PRE-FINISHED METAL BUILDING STANDING SEAM MTL ROOF; MR01 BRICK VENEER; BR01 METAL DOOR; MD01 A2A1 ANNEX GROUND LEVEL 263'-0" ANNEX ROOF 281'-0" 1 A7.02 SITE SOUTH 262'-6" 60'-4" BRICK VENEER; BR01 PRE-FINISHED METAL BUILDING STANDING SEAM MTL ROOF; MR01 18'-0"METAL DOOR; MD01