Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/05/1986 - Minutes - Planning & Zoning CommissionMINUTES • CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS Planning and Zoning Commission June 5, 1986 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: All present, including Council Liaison Bond who arrived at approximately 7:30 p.m. MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Al Mayo, Director of Planning, Assistant Directtor of Planning Callaway, City Engineer Pullen, Assistant City Attorney Elmore, and Planning Technician Volk AGBNDA ITEM NO. 1: Approval of ainutes - meeting of May 15, 19811. Mr. Brochu made a motion to approve the minutes as shown; Mr. Wendler seconded the motion which carried by a vote of 6-0-1 (Dresser abstained). AGBNDA ITBM NO. 2: Hear visitors. Jim Gardner came forward to address the current study of the city's Comprehensive Plan, and stated that he believes there should be a definite leader to coordinate this study, then asked who that leader will be. He also asked if this study will result in an updating or a revision of the existing plan, or if it will be a new • comprehensive plan, starting from scratch. He suggested that a new plan not 'be done, but rather that the existing plan should be updated. He asked if each section will have a workshop session between P&Z, staff and Council as did the goals and objectives approximately one week ago, with revisions to each section completed and brought before the public. He then asked how the public would be involved in this updating or revision of the existing plan and suggested specific work sessions to be held to give all sides of any questions the opportunity to be heard. Real Ransom representing a new business, Texas Body on Texas Avenue, came forward to ask what he could do to obtain a Certificate of Occupancy for this business without having the landscaping complete. He said the superintendent of construction has been in the hospital which is the reason for not having the landscaping finished, but added that it is very important for the business to open without any further delays. Mr. Kaiser mentioned the possibility of the company posting a bond and then advised him to confer with Mr. Mayo after the meeting to try to resolve this problem. AGBNDA ITBM N0. 3: 86-109: A public hearing on the question of rezoning Lots 22 & 23 Block 5 Hrdlicka Addition subdivision (813 & 815 Wellborn Road) from R-1 Single Family Residential to C-1 General Coanercial. Applicant is Myrna Hughes. Mr. Callaway explained the request, located the tracts, pointed out area zoning and existing land uses, adding that the area is reflected as commercial and medium density residential on the adopted land use plan, as well as the fact that these tracts were located in an area recently studied by a P&Z subcommittee and that group recommended that lots in the area should be zoned commercial when consolidated into • larger parcels. He went on to point out that the lots front on Wellborn Road., and are bounded by commercial and high density residential uses, thus the current single family zoning is not compatible with the adjacent uses, nor is the zoning in 1 compliance with either the adopted comprehensive plan or the subcommittee • recommendations following study of the area. He went on to say that the lot:. do not comply with the commercial development policies included in the plan with re~;pect to depth, and because the lots are locked in between Wellborn Road and developed tracts, no additional depth is available. He explained that the Wellborn Road Corridor Study recommended that the residential lots along this portion of Wellborn be zoned commercial "provided lots are consolidated with existing commercially zoned lots/tracts", further explaining that requiring a replat consolidating small lots with larger lots is an effort to minimize the problems associated with numerous small commercial lots and to provide for commercial development that is more in compliance with the city's commercial development policies, at the same time providing a vehicle which will allow F~roblems of conflicting access points, lack of access from one lot to another without entering traffic, signage or other restrictions to be addressed (on a replat). He then stated that rezoning contingent upon replatting has been approved by the Council in at least nine commercial rezoning cases since 1982, therefore staff recommends approval of C-1 zoning on the subject tracts contingent upon the lots being replatted in accordance with the recommendations of the Wellborn Corridor Study. Discussion followed concerning access to the existing high density apartment:;, if a remaining R-1 zoned tract could be developed, how to address that small "left:over" R-1 tract in the future, with Mr. Callaway advising that the P&Z can initiate re~:oning of a tract of land if it deems it the appropriate action to take. • The public hearing was opened. Don Jones, a partner in the partnership which holds title to the two subject tracts, came forward to state that it is his opinion that this rezoning would accomplish 2 things: That of cleaning up some vacant, urikept lots with dilapidated buildings, and would also provide land to house much-needed commercial services to an area where such services are lacking. Mr. Kaiser risked Mr. Jones if he had studied staff's recommendation regarding rezoning contingent upon replatting (consolidation) of the lots and Mr. Jones replied that the partnership is prepared to replat Lot 2B Block A of the Petterak Subdivision with Lots 23 & 22 being considered tonight, but he could not include Lot 2A Block A Petterak Subdivision as he does not hold title to it. He also pointed out that the two subject lots are not really platted as shown on the drawing enclosed in the packets, but rather hF~ve been sold in the past by metes and bounds. Access, joint access, and existing structures were discussed with Mr. Dresser stating that he would be reluctant to rezone these two lots without the condition of the replat referred to earlier in the discussion. Janice Burke, manager of the Southgate Apartments came forward to ask how thcs subject rezoning would affect the apartment complex and what impact commercial zoninf; would have on the complex. Mr. Kaiser explained the various uses which would be a7llowed in a C-1 zoning district, adding to clarify a misconception of Ms. Burke's that the subject rezoning only affects the land Mr. Jones' group owns, and if the P&Z decides to recommend rezoning of the small R-1 tract the apartment complex owns, she would have the opportunity to address that particular rezoning at that time. Mr. Efrochu further clarified by explaining that the subject rezoning request being cons~ldered at this meeting would not cause the apartment complex to lose any of its properi;y, and it would still have complete control over all the property under its ownersh'Lp. • No one else spoke. The public hearing was closed. Mr. Dresser asked if the:;e tracts are rezoned, is there anything to preclude the use of the existing buildings for commercial uses to which Mr. Callaway replied that with any change of use, cE>rtain P&Z Minutes 6-5-86 Page 2 building code regulations must be met which in this instance would most like]_y not be • cost effective. Mr. Kaiser asked if staff has any recommendation for the remaining small R-1 zoned tract to which Mr. Callaway replied that although staff has rio recommendation for that lot at this time, to change it to C-1 would not be he:lpful as long as it is owned by the apartment complex, although R-6 zoning might allow the complex better use of the land. Mr. Wendler said he sees no need to chfmge the zoning of that small tract unless it changes ownership. Mr. Mayo pointed out; that if it were rezoned to R-6, it would result in changing a non-conforming use to Fi conforming use. Mr. MacGilvray stated that he believes that this rezoning request fits in with the Wellborn Road study recommendations if it is made contingent upon replatting, and then made a motion to approve the rezoning of Lots 22 & 23 Hrdlicka subdivision from R-1 to C-1 contingent upon a replat of those lots combining them with Lot 2B Block A Petterak subdivision. Mrs. Sawtelle seconded the motion which carried unanimously (7-0). AGBNDA ITEM N0. 4: 86-110: A public hearing on the question of rezoning 10.701 acres in the Morgan Rector Survey A-46 located south of and adjacent to the Sandstone subdivision, (proposed Batates of Indian Trail subdivision) fros A-O Agriculture-Open to R-1 Single Family Residential. Applicant is the Cambridge Group. Mr. Callaway explained the request has been submitted by the owners to establish upon annexation a permanent zoning district for this subdivision, reminding the Commissioners that they have previously approved both a preliminary plat and a final plat for this subdivision, as well as having recommended annexation of this :land • upon receipt of a petition from the owners. He further explained that although the final rezoning of the area cannot take place prior to annexation, the public hearing can be held, and since staff has worked closely with the owners, the final ruling on the annexation should take place at the meeting just prior to the meeting at which the consideration of the rezoning request will go before the Council. The public hearing was opened. Nancy Fletcher who lives across Sandstone Drive from the land under consideration tonight came forward to ask what R-1 zoning would allow to which Mr. Mayo replied it will allow only single family residential devel~~pment, adding that this particular subdivision has lots much larger than the minimwn size required by ordinance, and in fact, has been platted for only 6 very large lets. Ms. Fletcher then said that the size of the lots and the condition of Sandstone ]Drive are of concern to her, and she would like to have the assurance of the city that it will look at the road when considering this rezoning as heavy traffic has already caused problems. She then asked who to talk to about the condition of the road and City Engineer Pullen referred her to the Department of Public Services. Mr. Kaiser stated that Ms. Fletcher's concern seems to be a maintenance problem and suggested that she consult with the designated staff or to take her complaint to the Council if she desires. The public hearing was closed. Discussion of the various concerns expressed about this subdivision, including the length of the cul-de-sac, maintenance of the doughnut hole in the middle of the cul- de-sac, whether or not these lots can be replatted into smaller lots followed. After the discussion, Mr. Wendler made a motion to recommend approval of this rezoning request from A-0 to R-1; Mr. Brochu seconded the motion which carried • unanimously (7-0). P&Z Minutes 6-5-86 Page 3 AGBNDA ITBM N0. 5: 86-111: A public hearing on the question of • rezoning two tracts totalling 29.34 acres located on the east side of Wellborn Road apx. 5500 feet south of the intersection of Wellborn & FM2818 (proposed Southwood Valley Sectin 28) from R-4 Apartment/Low Density and C-1 General Commercial to R-5 Apartment/Medium Density. Applicant is Area Progress Corporation. Mr. Callaway explained this rezoning, located the subject land and area zoning, pointed out the subject land is vacant and is reflected as commercial, high rind medium density residential on the adopted land use plan, thus the request is in compliance. He added that area densities were substantially lowered when 36„6 acres of R-4 zoning in this area were rezoned in 1985 to R-l, and went on to state that staff recommends approval of the requested zoning because it is in compliancE~ with the land use plan and is compatible with adjacent zoning districts and is well buffered from any low density residential areas. Mr. Kaiser asked the densii~y differences between R-4 and R-5 zoning and Mr. Callaway replied R-4 allows uF~ to 16 dwelling units per acre whereas R-5 allows up to 24 dwelling units per acre. The public hearing was opened. Dan Sears, representative of Area Progress Corporation came forward to explain that his company has been working with s~sveral fraternities to locate a suitable site for fraternity development, and this urea seems to be the best location which provides good access, good circulation and is located in an undeveloped area so when it begins to develop, the people will know exactly what is going to be there. He went on to explain platting plans and other area rezoning plans. Mr. Callaway pointed out that appropriate zoning of this tract is the only question to be considered with this request, and if fraternity/s~~rority houses are planned in the future, conditional use permits will have to be app?roved • and are subject to P&Z approval in accordance with Section 14 of the Zoning Ordinance. No one else spoke. The public hearing was closed. After additional discussion regarding the pros and cons of establishing several fraternities in one area, Mr. Brochu made a motion to approve this rezoning request from C-1 and R-4 to R-'~. Mr. Dresser seconded the motion which carried unanimously (7-0}. AGBNDA ITBM N0. 6: 86-304: Preliminary Plat - Woodcreek Section 3. Mr. Mayo explained this plat showing on a revised Master Preliminary Plat of the entire subdivision how this plat differs from what was originally proposed and approved. Mr. Mayo and Mr. Callaway explained that this area is part of an approved PITD development which was being developed in phases, with Mr. Mayo explaining that if an approved PUD is not developed, the area reverts back to the original zoning, with Mr. Callaway pointing out that a PUD does not preclude R-1 development. Mr. Kaiser asked what effect approval of these larger lots will have on an already approved PUD and Mr. Mayo stated that staff recommends approval of this preliminary plat and will check with the city attorney's office regarding any legal aspects. Mr. Wendler made a motion to approve this preliminary plat; Mr. Stewart seconded the motion which carried unanimously (7-0). AGBNDA ITBM N0. 7: Other business. • Mr. Kaiser asked Mr. Mayo to respond to the questions regarding updating Plan 2000 raised by Mr. Gardner at the beginning of the meeting and Mr. Mayo replied that the current plans are to have the entire plan reviewed and updated in-house by the Planning staff, 3 of whom are professional planners. He stated that plans are to P&Z Minutes 6-5-86 Page 4 have this review/revision or update to be completed by the end of the year. Mr. • Kaiser asked if there are plans to hold public hearings to solicit public input, or workshop sessions to provide information for the public that is interested. Mr. Mayo said that he has no problem with doing both except for the time frame, which will not allow for many. Mr. MacGilvray asked if there is any way to actively pursue publicity; perhaps contact can be made with various advocacy groups, adding that there are many people who would provide input (such as the Chamber of Commerce, the Historical Commission, etc.}, and he thinks this would be a good idea, even :if the process is somewhat delayed. Mr. Kaiser suggested that segments or elements of the Plan should be individually approached rather than handling it all together. Mr. Wendler expressed hope that when changes are proposed, they would be handled in much the same manner that the revision of the Zoning Ordinance was handled, with ~~ld and new language being shown with different type. He also suggested that perhaps if a master Plan was written in 13 sections, the newspaper might print each individual section simply as a public service, and then a public hearing could be scheduled after the publication of a particular section. He stated that how~sver it is handled, before a public hearing is held on the new Plan the public should be informed. Mr. Kaiser asked Mr. Mayo to please put together some type of plan as to how the P&Z can be a part of this revision or update, including a schedule of what will take place and when, and then the Commission can help decide if staff should develop that. section or if a workshop is needed. He asked Mr. Mayo to please put that plan on the next P&Z agenda. Mr. Kaiser then appointed Dan MacGilvray as the Vice Chairman of P&Z for the next year. • AGBNDA ITBM N0. 8: Adjourn. Mr. Dresser made a motion to adjourn; Mr. MacGilvray seconded the motion which carried unanimously. ATTEST: ----------------------------- City Secretary, Dian Jones r 1 ~J APPROVED: ,' ~ / ice Chairman, Daniel F. MacGily ay { P&Z Minutes 6-5-86 page 5 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION GUEST REGISTER DATE June 5, 1986 NAME ADDRESS .; .. -_ ~. -, ~ -, r, i ~ . (~ -. ., ;~ ~ r~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 . ~ ~;,_ t ~, ~ f,_. , Yr, ~ ;, ,z ~~, v~. _ _ , ~' r ~_~- ~~ -- 9. 10. ~ 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. • 24. 25. 6. Y r-~,,~> ,~ 'i -,, ~,~ ,. :~~ 7 . 'L~ ~ ~ ~ k _ ~.: 1. !, - ,,,~ L~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ I ~~ ~~ '~~~ ,f _, ,~;, 'f - ~ ~ , ~~ r~, , C *** REGISTRATION FORM *** (FOR PERSONS WHO WISH TO ADDRESS T E COMMISSION) i Date of Meeting ~-~t.''~ -" Commission Agenda tem No. v Name Address ~`-' House No. Street City IF SPEAKING FOR AN ORGANIZATION, Name of Organizatio~__ And, Speaker's Official Capacity: SUBJECT ON WHICH~B,ER13~ WISHES TO SPEAK Please remember to step to the podium as soon as you are recognized by the chair; hand your completed reg(stratlon form to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR COMMISSION FILES. The Commission will appreciate each speaker limiting an address on any one item to flue minutes. Thank you for your cooperation. *** REGISTRATION FORM *** (FOR PERSONS WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE(C^OMMISSION) Date of Meeting ~/ IF SPEAKING FOR AN ORGANIZATION, Name of Organization: And, Speaker's Official Capacity: C7h1 hf ~ { CommissQlon Agenda Iyt~e/m No, Name ~C. ~, ~ \ ~~Q 1 ~ Address ~ V ~./V ~~s ~V ~ l.I J House No. Street City IRJECT ON WHICH PERSON WISHES TO SPEAK C~~j~i'r\~'n q Ol C , 0 Please remember to step to the podium as soon as you are recognized by [he chair; hand your completed registration form to the presldfng officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have ...:tten notes you wish [o present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR COMMISSION FILES. The Commission will appreciate each speaker limiting an address on any one Item to flue minutes. Thank you for your cooperation. *** REGISTRATION FORM *** (FOR PERSONS WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION) r Date of Meeting I^, '~ ~ "" Commission Agenda Item No. -~, _. _ Name _ .fin?,~L° `1 C~w`~~ Address 1 q[i/ ~ +-~ ~'"/_/~~-i"(/~Rf ~~ -~ House No ~ Street Clty IF SPEAKING FOR AN ORGANIZATION, Name of Organization: \ And, Speaker's Official Capacity: ,~~ t SUBJECT ON WHICH PERSON WISHES TO SPEAK Please remember to step to the podium as soon as you are recognized by the chair; hand your completed registration form to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before Deglnning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish to present [o the Canmission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR COMMISSION FILES. The Commission will appreciate each speaker limiting an address on any one Item to flue minutes. Thank you for your cooperation. *** REGISTRATION FORM *'* (FOR PERSONS WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION) Date of Meeting ~j~ /~ / ~~ Commission Agenda Item No, p ~p - /~ g Name v Vl ~ l i G ~ rr~^^ y` ~ I Address ' / ~ t] ~~ LW ~ ~R~q~ House No. Street Ci y • IF SPEAKING FOR AN ORGANIZATION, Name of Organization: ~~7.~ i ,I~C~'ITC '~iGCf~C~ And, Speaker's Official Capacity: SUBJECT ON WHICH PERSON WISHES TO SPEAK The Commission will appreciate each speaker limiting an address on any one Item to flue minutes. Thank you for your cooperation. • Please remember to step to the podium as soon as you are recognized by [he chair; hand your completed reglseration form to [he presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. If you have written notes you wish eo present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR COMMISSION FILES. *** REGISTRATION FORM *** (FOR PERSONS WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION) Da [e of Meeting ~/ V Vy a ~1D Commission Agenda Item No 86 -/// Name lJV ~/~~C~~/s /1 ` x Address ~~V ( r~~V~ `~V ~ `~ ~"• House No. Street City IF SPEAKING FOR AN ORGANIZATION, Name of Organization: ~l'l7 ~S !~ ys ~ v fir, ~'~~ And, Speaker's Official Capacity: e w~/7lar~- - /7y - 7~~ ~~ SUBJECT ON WHICH PERSON WISHES TO SPEAK Please remember to step to the podium as soon as you are recognized by [he chair; hand your completed registration form to the presiding officer and state your name and residence before beginning your presentation. if you have written notes you wish to present to the Commission, PLEASE FURNISH AN EXTRA COPY FOR COMMISSION FILES. The Commission will appre~ate each speaker limiting an address on any one Item to flue minutes. Tha k you for your cooperation.