Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/11/2008 - Regular Agenda Packet - City CouncilMayor Councilmembers Ben White John Crompton Mayor Pro Tem James Massey Lynn McIlhaney Dennis Maloney City Manager Lawrence Stewart Glenn Brown David Ruesink Agenda College Station City Council Regular Meeting Thursday, September 11, 2008 at 7:00 PM City Hall Council Chamber, 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 1. Pledge of Allegiance, Invocation, Consider absence request. Presentation of Historic Home Marker #83. Hear Visitors: A citizen may address the City Council on any item which does not appear on the posted Agenda. Registration forms are available in the lobby and at the desk of the City Secretary. This form should be completed and delivered to the City Secretary by 6:30 pm. Please limit remarks to three minutes. A timer alarm will sound after 2 1/2 minutes to signal thirty seconds remaining to conclude your remarks. The City Council will receive the information, ask staff to look into the matter, or place the issue on a future agenda. Topics of operational concerns shall be directed to the City Manager. ON BEHALF OF THE CITIZENS OF COLLEGE STATION, HOME OF TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY, WE WILL CONTINUE TO PROMOTE AND ADVANCE THE COMMUNITY 'S QUALITY OF LIFE. Consent Agenda Individuals who wish to address the City Council on a consent or regular agenda item not posted as a public hearing shall register with the City Secretary prior to the Mayor’s reading of the agenda item. Registration forms are available in the lobby and at the desk of the City Secretary. The Mayor will recognize individuals who wish to come forward to speak for or against the item. The speaker will state their name and address for the record and allowed three minutes. A timer will sound at 2 1/2 minutes to signal thirty seconds remaining for remarks. 2. Presentation, possible action and discussion of consent agenda items which consists of ministerial or "housekeeping" items required by law. Items may be removed from the consent agenda by majority vote of the Council. a. Presentation, possible action, and discussion of minutes for City Council Workshop and Regular Meetings August 28, 2008. 1 City Council Regular Meeting Page 2 Thursday, September 11, 2008 b. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding resolutions to be considered by the Texas Municipal League. c. Presentation, possible action and discussion on the award of bid #08-84 to Brazos Paving, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $411,000.00 for the annual blanket order of concrete curb/gutter & flatwork used to maintain City infrastructure. d. Presentation, possible action and discussion regarding a resolution to approve contract #08-284 in an amount not to exceed $193,010.00 with Envirosolve, Inc. to provide Household Hazardous Waste Collection Services. e. Presentation, possible action, and discussion of a user agreement between Texas A&M University and the City of College Station authorizing Texas A&M University to provide the University Services Building parking lot area and ingress/egress roads on October 4, 2008 to the Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency for the fall Household Hazardous Waste & Computer Collection event. f. Presentation, possible action and discussion regarding award of bid #08-89 to Ergon Asphalt & Emulsions to provide Emulsified Asphalt products for the maintenance of streets in an amount not to exceed $478,104.00. g. Presentation, possible action, and discussion on consideration of an ordinance amending Chapter 10, “Traffic Code,” creating an operational speed limit on F&B Road between FM 2818 and Turkey Creek Road. h. Presentation, possible action, and discussion on consideration of an ordinance amending Chapter 10, “Traffic Code,” which creates an operational speed limit on Old Wellborn Road. i. Presentation, possible action and discussion on extending the bank depository agreement with Citibank Texas, N.A. for one additional year. j. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding acceptance of Bid Proposal from Bid # 08- 76 for construction of a new bathhouse at the Adamson Lagoon Swimming Pool, in the amount of $1,141,179. k. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Renewal Agreement for an Annual Landscape Maintenance Service Contract for thirty-one (31) sites comprised of municipal buildings, municipal sites, parks, and street medians to Green Teams, Inc. (d.b.a., The Greenery) for an annual expenditure of $312,852.75. l. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Change Order to an existing Landscape Maintenance Service Contract with Green Teams, Inc. (d.b.a. The Greenery), in the amount of $30,423.00, to add the annual landscape maintenance functions for Cove of Nantucket Park, Fire Station #3B, Texas Avenue Phase II, and additional maintenance areas for W.D. Fitch Parkway. m. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a change order to Contract #07-273 in the amount of $28,526.68 to JaCody, Inc. for construction work associated with Police Department Renovations Project. 2 City Council Regular Meeting Page 3 Thursday, September 11, 2008 n. Presentation, possible action and discussion regarding adoption of a resolution awarding contract #08-277 for the College Park/Breezy Heights Rehabilitation Project to Brazos Valley Services in the amount of $4,116,581.28. o. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the approval of a construction contract (Contract #08-273) with Siemens Building Technologies Inc. in the amount of $104,471.45 for the installation of access and security equipment at the College Station Police Department Building. p. Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Professional Services Contract with Kimley- Horn and Associates, Inc. (KHA), in the amount of $87,000.00, for the engineering development and implementation of a Roadway Impact Fee program. q. Presentation, possible action, and discussion of the City Council’s 2008-2013 Strategic Plan. r. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding contract for Third Party Claims Administration with A S & G Claims Administration, Inc. for an annual expenditure of $52,000. Anticipated workers compensation claims for FY09 are $401,000 and anticipated liability claims for FY09 are $330,000. Regular Agenda Individuals who wish to address the City Council on a regular agenda item not posted as a public hearing shall register with the City Secretary prior to the Mayor’s reading of the agenda item. The Mayor will recognize you to come forward to speak for or against the item. The speaker will state their name and address for the record and allowed three minutes. A timer will sound at 2 1/2 minutes to signal thirty seconds remaining for remarks. Individuals who wish to address the City Council on an item posted as a public hearing shall register with the City Secretary prior to the Mayor’s announcement to open the public hearing. The Mayor will recognize individuals who wish to come forward to speak for or against the item. The speaker will state their name and address for the record and allowed three minutes. A timer alarm will sound at 2 1/2 minutes to signal thirty seconds remaining to conclude remarks. After a public hearing is closed, there shall be no additional public comments. If Council needs additional information from the general public, some limited comments may be allowed at the discretion of the Mayor. If an individual does not wish to address the City Council, but still wishes to be recorded in the official minutes as being in support or opposition to an agenda item, the individual may complete the registration form provided in the lobby by providing the name, address, and comments about a city related subject. These comments will be referred to the City Council and City Manager. 1. Public hearing, presentation, possible action and discussion on the City of College Station 2008-2009 advertised ad valorem tax rate of $0.450000 per $100 valuation. Also discussion and possible action on announcing the meeting date, time and place to adopt the tax rate. 2. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on the City of College Station 2008-2009 proposed budget. 3 City Council Regular Meeting Page 4 Thursday, September 11, 2008 3. Public Hearing, possible action, and discussion on an ordinance Budget Amendment #3 amending ordinance number 2999 which will amend the budget for the 2007-2008 Fiscal Year and authorizing amended expenditures in the amount of $11,061,623 and presentation, possible action and discussion on several contingency transfers and an interfund loan. 4. Public Hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion concerning approval to advertise for construction bids for the Bike Loop project which includes pedestrian improvements to the intersection of Longmire and Harvey Mitchell Parkway. 5. Public hearing, presentation, possible action and discussion concerning approval to advertise for the William D. Fitch Pkwy Widening Phase II project construction bid. 6. Public hearing, Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an Amendment to Resolutions Determining Need associated with the Rock Prairie Road East Widening, Design and ROW Project. 7. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on amendments to Chapter 12, City of College Station Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Ordinance Article 2 Development Review Bodies, Article 3 Development Procedures, Section 4.1 Establishment of Districts, Article 5 District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards, Article 10 Enforcement, and Section 11.2 Defined Terms as they relate to the creation of a Landmark Commission and Historic Preservation Overlay District. 8. Public hearing, presentation, possible action and discussion on an ordinance rezoning 34.06 acres from A-O, Agricultural-Open to R-1, Single Family Residential (17.48) acres, R-3, Townhouse (10.09 acres), and R-4, Multi-Family Residential (6.49 acres) located off Jones- Butler Road and near Cain Road, adjacent to the Las Palomas Subdivision. 9. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance approving an increase in rates for Atmos Energy pursuant to the Rate Review Mechanism tariff approved earlier this year. 10. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a draft of the 2008 bond referendum brochure. 11. Adjourn. If litigation issues arise to the posted subject matter of this Council Meeting an executive session will be held. APPROVED: ________________________________ City Manager Notice is hereby given that a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of College Station, Texas will be held on the Thursday, September 11, 2008 at 7:00 PM at the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas. The following subjects will be discussed, to wit: See Agenda. 4 City Council Regular Meeting Page 5 Thursday, September 11, 2008 Posted this 8th day of September, 2008 at 3:00 pm. E-Signed by Connie Hooks VERIFY authenticity with ApproveIt ________________________________ City Secretary I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the above Notice of Meeting of the Governing Body of the City of College Station, Texas, is a true and correct copy of said Notice and that I posted a true and correct copy of said notice on the bulletin board at City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, in College Station, Texas, and the City’s website, www.cstx.gov . The Agenda and Notice are readily accessible to the general public at all times. Said Notice and Agenda were posted on September 8, 2008 at 3:00 pm and remained so posted continuously for at least 72 hours proceeding the scheduled time of said meeting. This public notice was removed from the official posting board at the College Station City Hall on the following date and time: __________________________ by ________________________. Dated this _____day of ________________, 2008. By______________________________________ Subscribed and sworn to before me on this the _____day of ________________, 2008. ______________________________ Notary Public – Brazos County, Texas My commission expires: ___________ The building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764- 3517 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. Agendas may be viewed on www.cstx.gov . Council meetings are broadcast live on Cable Access Channel 19. 5 September 11, 2008 Consent Agenda Item No. 2b TML Resolutions To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Kathy Merrill, Assistant City Manager Agenda Caption: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding resolutions to be considered by the Texas Municipal League. Recommendation(s): Approve the resolution prepared by the Shelleys for submittal to the Texas Municipal League Resolutions Committee. Summary: Dan Shelley, College Station’s state legislative consultant, attended the Council’s August 28 meeting to provide an update on expected legislative trends for the 2009 session. Mr. Shelley and Mrs. Rodriguez also received Council feedback on certain issues as well as receiving input from the Council for resolutions to be submitted to the Texas Municipal League from the City of College Station. This item involves approving a Resolution regarding the funding of transportation projects. The resolution was prepared by the Shelleys, and once approved by Council, will be submitted for possible adoption at TML’s 2008 conference. Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. The Resolution will be sent to Council prior to the meeting 6 September 11, 2008 Consent Agenda Item No. 2c Annual Curb, Gutter & Flatwork Price Agreement To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Mark Smith, Director of Public Works Agenda Caption: Presentation, discussion and possible action on the award of bid #08-84 to Brazos Paving, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $411,000.00 for the annual blanket order of concrete curb/gutter & flatwork used to maintain City infrastructure. Recommendation(s): Staff recommends award of Bid #08-84 to Brazos Paving, Inc. in the amount not to exceed $411,000.00 annually. Summary: Maintenance of flatwork, curbs and gutters is contracted on an as needed basis, by the Public Works Department and College Station Utilities. Bids were received from 5 (five) companies with the lowest bid submitted by Brazos Paving, Inc. Brazos Paving $411,000.00 Acklam Construction $543,000.00 Myers Concrete Construction $552,000.00 Knife River $592,200.00 Brazos Valley Services $600,000.00 Budget & Financial Summary: Funding for this service comes from the operating budgets for streets, drainage and utility maintenance. Attachments: 1. Bid tabulation #08-84 2. Resolution 7 Co n c r e t e F l a t w o r k , C u r b & G u t t e r i n g BI D # 0 8 - 8 4 - S t r e e t s 08 / 1 4 / 0 8 It e m Es t . Y e a r l y Un i t T o t a l U n i t T o t a l U n i t T o t a l U n i t T o t a l U n i t T o t a l No . Qu a n t i t y De s c r i p t i o n P r i c e P r i c e P r i c e P r i c e P r i c e P r i c e P r i c e P r i c e P r i c e P r i c e BA S E B I D : 1 6, 0 0 0 l i n . f t . Re m o v e & R e p l a c e C o n c r e t e C u r b & G u t t e r , in a c c o r d a n c e w i t h T S D H P T 1 9 9 3 S t a n d a r d Sp e c s , i t e m # 3 6 0 , & a c c o r d i n g t o C o l l e g e St a t i o n S p e c s 4 0 1 & 7 0 2 , 5 0 1 , 5 0 2 , 5 0 3 , 5 0 4 (c o p y a t t a c h e d ) $ 2 6 . 0 0 $ 1 5 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 9 . 5 0 $ 1 7 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 3 . 0 0 $ 1 9 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 6 . 0 0 $ 2 1 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 2 4 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 60 0 c u . y d . Re m o v e & R e p l a c e C o n c r e t e F l a t w o r k (s i d e w a l k s , d r i v e w a y s , a p r o n s , g u t t e r s ) i n ac c o r d a n c e w i t h T S D H P T 1 9 9 3 S t a n d a r d Sp e c s , I t e m # 3 6 0 , & a c c o r d i n g t o C o l l e g e St a t i o n S p e c s 7 0 2 , 4 0 2 , 5 0 1 , 5 0 2 , 5 0 3 , 5 0 4 (c o p y a t t a c h e d ) $ 4 2 5 . 0 0 $ 2 5 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 1 0 . 0 0 $ 3 6 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 9 0 . 0 0 $ 3 5 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 2 7 . 0 0 $ 3 7 6 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 6 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 Ba s e P r i c e $ 4 1 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 4 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 5 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 9 2 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 Brazos Valley Services Br a z o s P a v i n g A c k l a m C o n s t r u c t i o n K n i f e R i v e r My e r s C o n c r e t e Page 1 of 1 8 RESOLUTION NO._______________ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, APPROVING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE ANNUAL CURB, GUTTER & FLATWORK PRICE AGREEMENT PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS. WHEREAS, the City of College Station, Texas, solicited bids for the construction phase of the Annual Curb, Gutter & Flatwork Price Agreement Project; and WHEREAS, the selection of Brazos Paving Inc. is being recommended as the lowest responsible bidder for the construction services related to Annual Curb, Gutter & Flatwork Price Agreement; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That the City Council hereby finds that Brazos Paving Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder. PART 2: That the City Council hereby approves the contract with Brazos Paving Inc. for $411,000.0 for the labor, materials and equipment required for the improvements related to the Annual Curb, Gutter & Flatwork Price Agreement Project. PART 3: That the funding for this Contract shall be as budgeted from the Drainage and Utility Funds, Drainage and Water Divisions, in the amount of $411,000.00. PART 4: That this resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its passage. ADOPTED this day of , A.D. 2008. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary MAYOR APPROVED: E-Signed by Mary Ann Powell VERIFY authenticity with ApproveIt City Attorney 9 NEW COVERSHEET FORMAT EXAMPLE 1 September 11, 2008 Consent Agenda Item No. 2d Contract for Household Hazardous Waste Collection Services To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Mark Smith, Director of Public Works Agenda Caption: Presentation, possible action and discussion regarding a resolution to approve contract #08-284 in an amount not to exceed $193,010.00 with Envirosolve, Inc. to provide Household Hazardous Waste Collection Services. Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of the contract. Summary: This purchase is for collection and disposal services for household hazardous waste. The Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency (BVSWMA) in cooperation with the City of Bryan and City of College Station Sanitation Division conducts a semi-annual event at the TAMU University Services Building. These events (each spring and fall) allow individual households in the Brazos Valley to bring their household hazardous wastes to the Brazos Center free of charge. The contractor is responsible for disposing of these wastes in accordance with all local, state, and federal environmental laws. The contractor is also responsible for submitting to BVSWMA a detailed analysis of all the waste collected and the disposal methods used. Envirosolve, Inc. was the lowest of three responding bidders for Invitation to Bid #08-88, which opened on August 18, 2008. This is an annual contract to supply BVSWMA with collection, categorization, packaging, transportation, recycling and disposal services for household hazardous waste. This 2008 contract #08-284 is in an amount not to exceed $193,010.00 for two events. The 2007 contract amount was $179,474.00 and the actual amount spent for the last two events was $145,980.19. BVSWMA will only be charged for the actual amount of waste received, processed, and disposed of by the contractor. Budget & Financial Summary: Funds are available and budgeted in the Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency Fund. As this contract is in excess of $50,000, it will require the approval of the Bryan City Council. Attachments: 1. HHW Collection Resolution 2. HHW Collection Bid Tabulation 10 RESOLUTION NO._______________ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, APPROVING A CONTRACT FOR THE COLLECTION OF HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS. WHEREAS, the City of College Station, Texas, solicited bids for the Collection of Household Hazardous Waste; and WHEREAS, the selection of Envirosolve, Inc. is being recommended as the lowest responsible bidder for the services related to the Collection of Household Hazardous Waste ; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of College Station, Texas: PART 1: That the City Council hereby finds that Envirosolve, Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder. PART 2: That the City Council hereby approves the contract with Envirosolve, Inc. for $193,010.00 for the labor, materials and equipment required for the Collection of Household Hazardous Waste. PART 3: That the funding for these services shall be as budgeted from the Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency Account in the amount of $193,010.00. PART 4: That this resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its passage. ADOPTED this day of , A.D. 2008. ATTEST: APPROVED: CONNIE HOOKS, City Secretary BEN WHITE, Mayor APPROVED: E-Signed by Mary Ann Powell VERIFY authenticity with ApproveIt City Attorney 11 HH H W C O L L E C T I O N S E R V I C E S BI D T A B U L A T I O N # 0 8 - 8 8 BV S W M A En v i r o s o l v e , I n c . C l e a n H a r b o r s Ph i l i p R e c l a m a t i o n S v c s . Un i t I t e m U n i t I t e m U n i t I t e m De s c r i p t i o n P r i c e T o t a l P r i c e T o t a l P r i c e T o t a l Re c y c l a b l e P a i n t $ 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 3 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 7 1 , 8 7 5 . 0 0 $ 2 3 0 . 0 0 $ 3 1 6 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 No n - R e c y c l a b l e P a i n t $ 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 7 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 9 5 . 0 0 $ 2 1 , 7 8 0 . 0 0 $ 5 3 5 . 0 0 $ 2 3 , 5 4 0 . 0 0 Cl e a n e r s , A c i d s , B a s e s $ 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 1 5 . 0 0 $ 3 , 8 7 0 . 0 0 Ox i d e s $ 2 2 5 . 0 0 $ 4 , 7 2 5 . 0 0 $ 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 2 9 3 . 0 0 $ 6 , 1 5 3 . 0 0 Fl a m m a b l e L i q u i d s $ 1 1 5 . 0 0 $ 5 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 $ 7 5 . 0 0 $ 3 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 Fl a m m a b l e S o l i d s $ 5 5 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 9 5 0 . 0 0 $ 5 9 5 . 0 0 $ 5 , 3 5 5 . 0 0 $ 6 0 5 . 0 0 $ 5 , 4 4 5 . 0 0 Pe s t i c i d e L i q u i d s $ 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 4 , 6 2 5 . 0 0 $ 2 1 0 . 0 0 $ 9 , 4 5 0 . 0 0 Pe s t i c i d e S o l i d s $ 5 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 6 5 0 . 0 0 $ 9 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 9 2 . 0 0 $ 2 , 0 7 6 . 0 0 PC B ' s $ 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 2 0 . 0 0 $ 2 2 0 . 0 0 $ 4 9 5 . 0 0 $ 4 9 5 . 0 0 Wa t e r R e a c t i v e s $ 1 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 0 . 0 0 Cy a n i d e s $ 1 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 0 . 0 0 Su l f u r $ 2 7 5 . 0 0 $ 2 7 5 . 0 0 $ 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 2 1 5 . 0 0 $ 2 1 5 . 0 0 Or g a n i c P e r o x i d e s $ 1 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 0 . 0 0 As b e s t o s $ 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 1 0 . 0 0 $ 1 1 0 . 0 0 Ar s e n i c a l P e s t i c i e s $ 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 0 5 . 0 0 $ 3 0 5 . 0 0 $ 2 1 5 . 0 0 $ 2 1 5 . 0 0 Me r c u r y ( M F D , A r t i c l e s ) $ 1 2 5 . 0 0 $ 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 7 5 . 0 0 $ 3 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 8 . 0 0 $ 2 5 6 . 0 0 Me r c u r y ( e l e m e n t a l ) $ 1 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 7 5 . 0 0 $ 1 7 5 . 0 0 $ 1 2 8 . 0 0 $ 1 2 8 . 0 0 Re c y c l a b l e B a t t e r i e s $ 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 0 . 0 0 No n - R e c y c l a b l e B a t t e r i e s $ 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 9 5 . 0 0 $ 2 9 5 . 0 0 $ 3 1 0 . 0 0 $ 3 1 0 . 0 0 Ae r o s o l s $ 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 1 5 . 0 0 $ 1 , 7 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 6 2 . 0 0 $ 1 , 2 9 6 . 0 0 Pr o p a n e $ 2 2 5 . 0 0 $ 4 5 0 . 0 0 $ 4 8 9 . 0 0 $ 9 7 8 . 0 0 $ 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 5 0 0 . 0 0 Ga s C y l i n d e r s ( e x c . P r o p a n e ) $ 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 2 5 . 0 0 $ 2 2 5 . 0 0 $ 4 5 0 . 0 0 $ 4 5 0 . 0 0 Em p t y N o n - D O T D r u m $ 2 0 . 0 0 $ 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 . 0 0 $ 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 . 0 0 $ 5 0 0 . 0 0 Fl u o r e s c e n t B u l b s n o n - P C B $ 1 7 5 . 0 0 $ 3 5 0 . 0 0 $ 9 5 . 0 0 $ 1 9 0 . 0 0 $ 1 6 0 . 0 0 $ 3 2 0 . 0 0 Fl u o r e s c e n t B u l b s w i t h P C B $ 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 3 5 . 0 0 $ 2 3 5 . 0 0 An t i f r e e z e $ 6 0 . 0 0 $ 3 6 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 Us e d M o t o r O i l $ 6 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 Se c t i o n I T o t a l $1 9 3 , 0 1 0 . 0 0 $ 2 3 5 , 4 4 3 . 0 0 $ 3 7 9 , 8 1 4 . 0 0 Mo b i l i z a t i o n $ 1 8 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 $ 3 6 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8 , 2 4 2 . 0 0 $ 1 6 , 4 8 4 . 0 0 Se c t i o n I I T o t a l $3 6 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 6 , 4 8 4 . 0 0 GR A N D T O T A L ( S e c t i o n s I & I I ) $ 2 2 9 , 5 1 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 3 , 4 4 3 . 0 0 $ 3 9 6 , 2 9 8 . 0 0 12 September 11, 2008 Consent Agenda Item No. 2e BVSWMA TAMU Household Hazardous Waste Collection Event User Agreement To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Mark Smith, Director of Public Works Agenda Caption: Presentation, possible action, and discussion of a user agreement between Texas A&M University and the City of College Station authorizing Texas A&M University to provide the University Services Building parking lot area and ingress/egress roads on October 4, 2008 to the Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency for the fall Household Hazardous Waste & Computer Collection event. Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of the user agreement authorizing Texas A&M University to provide the University Services Building parking lot area, and ingress/egress roads on October 4, 2008 to the Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency for the fall Household Hazardous Waste & Computer Collection Event. Summary: The Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency has a semi-annual regional Household Hazardous Waste & Computer Collection Event for the safe disposal and recycling of household hazardous waste. The Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency has held the past two events at the location, which provides a safe environment for the disposal of hazardous waste at the University Services Building. Budget & Financial Summary: None. Attachments: 1. User Agreement 2. Location Map 13 Office of Facilities Coordination August 28,2008 Shelia Davis McQueen Prograni Coordi~iator City of College Station Public WorksIBVSWMA Shelia, The approvals from Texas A&M University for use of the University Services Building (USB) by BVSWMA for the October 2008 Household Hazardous Waste Collection event have been finalized and are included on the attached contract. Please note the need for City of College Station approvals on the contract. Terms and conditions of the use remain basically the same as in the two previous events. The one significant change is increasing the access window to include the Monday after the weekend event. Please return the signed, f~~lly executed agreement to this office prior to the event. Please let us know if we may be of further assistance. Thank you. Sincerely, David A. ~orrisonl Manager of Facilities Information 1001 General Services Complex 1 369TAM U College Station, TX 77843-1 369 Tel. 979.845.8661 http://fcor.tamu.edu/ 14 Site Use Agreement This Site Use Agreement is entered into by and between Texas A&M University, a component of the Texas A&M University System, an agency of the State of Texas ("University") and the City of College Station, a Home Rule Municipal Corporation, on behalf of the Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency ("BVSWMA"). Whereas, BVSWMA conducts, on a semi-annual basis, its Household Hazardous Waste and Computer Collection Event ("Event") for the benefit of the citizens of Brazos and surrounding counties, and Whereas, Texas A&M University System Policy 33.04 Use of System Property states, "No TAMUS employee shall entrust state property to any state official or employee or to anyone else to be used for other than state purposes. . .", and Whereas, Texas A&M University Rule 41.05.02.Ml Space and Land Use Management states, "The President will oversee the day-to-day management and maintenance of real property and improvements located on thecollege Station Campus. The President delegates this authority for space assignment and land use to (1) Vice President for Administration for non-academic unit space assignments and general land use...", and Whereas, University agrees to grant BVSWMA the privilege of hosting Event on certain facilities of Texas A&M University and University will provide parking area, ingress and egress to BVSWMA and the end users of the Event. The facility is referred to by TAMU as the University Service Building, located at 3380 University Dr. East and as further shown in the attached Exhibit A ("Site"), Therefore, in consideration of the mutual premises, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the University and BVSWMA agree as follows: 1. The times and dates of access granted to BVSWMA begin at 8:00 a.m. on Friday, October 3,2008 and end at 5:00 p.m. on Monday, October 6, 2008. The schedule for collection activities is 9:OOa.m. through 4:00 p.m. on October 4, 2008. Access is granted for Event set-up, Event and Event clean-up during the times stated above. 2. BVSWMA will be solely responsible, at its sole cost and expense, for arranging personnel including, but not limited to, hazardous waste collection contractors, employees volunteers and sufficient law enforcement personnel to assist with traff~c control, and all equipment necessary for the conduct of Event. 3. BVSWMA will be responsible for applying herbicide and cleaning of access asphalt road from Site to Harvey Rd. TAMU and BVSWMA will evaluate the asphalt road at the conclusion of the event to determine if the level of traffic necessitates repair to the road. In the event repairs are needed, BVSWMA and University will enter into a separate written agreement to establish the terms and conditions for such repairs. 4. BVSWMA will be responsible for Event advertising, Event set up, including all coordination with and direction of contractors, employees, volunteers at the Site, conduct of the Event, including the installation of electronic traffic signs and hiring of sufficient law enforcement personnel to assist with traffic flowldirection, and all Event clean up activities. 5. BVSWMA will be solely responsible for cleaning all debris, refuse or any waste produced as a result of event and shall return University's premises to original condition as found prior to BVSWMA use of premises. Should University incur any costs or otherwise be obligated to clean or restore the area to its original condition, BVSWMA shall reimburse University for all such costs upon receipt of invoice from University. BVSWMA 191 04 (2) 15 6. SUBJECT TO THE LIMITATION AS TO DAMAGES IN THE TEXAS TORT CLAIMS ACT, BVSWMA WILL INDEMNIFY, DEFEND, AND HOLD HARMLESS UNIVERSITY AND ANY OF ITS COMPONENTS, OFFICERS OR EMPLOYEES FROM ANY CLAIM, DEMAND OR SUIT WHATSOEVER, WHETHER BASED UPON PERSONAL INJLRY, INCLUDING DEATH, OR PROPERTY DAMAGE, OR OTHERWISE, WHICH RELATES IN ANY WAY TO THE USE OF UNIVERSITY PROPERTY BY BVSWMA FOR THE EVENT AS SET FORTH HEREIN CAUSED BY THE BVSWMA'S NEGLIGENCE. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, NEITHER THE CITY NOR BVSWMA CONSENT TO SUIT OR WAIVE THEIR RESPECTIVE GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY. 7. BVSWMA will be responsible for assuring BVSWMA employees and guests are made aware of and comply with appropriate University rules and regulations and shall be held responsible for their conduct while occupying University property. 8. BVSWMA, as host of the event, is responsible for defraying all costs associated with the Event either through sponsorship or direct payment with BVSWMA funds. 9. It is understood that this Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes any and all prior agreements, arrangements, diagrams or understandings between the parties relating to the subject matter. No oral understandings, statements, promises, or inducements contrary to the terms of this Agreement exist. IN WITNESS OF THIS AGREEMENT, BVSWMA and University, through their duly appointed agents, have executed this Agreement in duplicate originals. EXECUTED this the day of ,2008 by University and BVSWMA. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION (BVSWMA) Terry Pankratz Ben White Vice President and Chief Financial Officer May or ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED: City Manager University Contracts Officer I City Attorney Chief Financial Officer BVSWMA 19104 (2) 16 0 150 300 Household Hazardous Waste Traffic Control Plan ~~~t 17 VETERANS PARKVETERANS PARK BRAZOS VALLEY PHYSICIANSBRAZOS VALLEY PHYSICIANS H a r v e y R d U n i v e r s i t y D r E Do m i n i k Dr C o p p e r f i e l d D r G l e n h a v e n D r U n i v e r s i t y O a k s B l v d Fr a n c i s D r A p p o m a tt o x D r W o o d c r e s t D r O L D T I R D 18 September 11, 2008 Consent Agenda Item No. 2f Emulsified Asphalt Price Agreement To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Mark Smith, Director of Public Works Agenda Caption: Presentation, discussion and possible action regarding award of bid #08-89 to Ergon Asphalt & Emulsions to provide Emulsified Asphalt products for the maintenance of streets in an amount not to exceed $478,104.00. Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of the bid award for one year to Ergon Asphalt & Emulsions. Summary: Ergon Asphalt & Emulsions submitted the only acceptable of two bids for each of three options for a new blanket purchase agreement to provide Emulsified Asphalt for the maintenance of streets in the City. The recommended bid amount from Ergon Asphalt & Emulsions is $478,104.00 (140,000 gallons maximum). Cleveland Asphalt submitted the second bid in the amount of $425,338.00 but “does not guarantee prices” and also added an additional demurrage charge. The cost per gallon of HFRS delivered for the annual bid has increased 100.16% (from $1.60 per gallon to $3.45) in one year due to the increased cost of asphaltic cement products. The contract supports maintenance operations in the Street Maintenance Division. Budget & Financial Summary: Funding is available in the operating budget of the Street Maintenance Division. Attachments: Tabulation of Bid 08-89 19 Er g o n A s p h a l t & E m u l s i o n s C l e v e l a n d A s p h a l t It e m E s t . U n i t T o t a l U n i t T o t a l No . Q t y . U n i t De s c r i p t i o n P r i c e P r i c e P r i c e P r i c e 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 g a l E m u l s i o n , H F R S ( D e l i v e r e d ) $3 . 4 5 3 4 5 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ $ 3 . 2 1 3 2 0 , 6 7 0 . 0 0 $ 2 2 0 0 0 0 g a l E m u l s i o n , C R S ( D e l i v e r e d ) 3. 4 0 $ 6 7 , 9 0 4 . 0 0 $ 2 . 7 5 $ 5 5 , 0 6 8 . 0 0 $ To t a l 1 & 2 41 3 , 1 0 4 . 0 0 $ 3 7 5 , 7 3 8 . 0 0 $ 2b 2 0 0 0 0 g a l E m u l s i o n , C R S ( P i c k u p b y C i t y ) 3. 2 5 $ 6 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 . 4 8 $ 4 9 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ To t a l 1 & 2 & 2 b 47 8 , 1 0 4 . 0 0 $ 4 2 5 , 3 3 8 . 0 0 $ Se m i - A n n u a l E s t i m a t e s It e m E s t . U n i t T o t a l U n i t T o t a l No . Q t y . U n i t D e s c r i p t i o n P r i c e P r i c e P r i c e P r i c e 1 5 0 0 0 0 g a l E m u l s i o n , H F R S ( D e l i v e r e d ) $ 3 . 2 0 1 6 0 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ $ 3 . 1 6 1 5 7 , 8 3 5 . 0 0 $ 2 1 0 0 0 0 g a l E m u l s i o n , C R S ( D e l i v e r e d ) 3 . 1 5 $ 3 1 , 4 5 2 . 0 0 $ 2 . 7 5 $ 2 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ To t a l 1 & 2 19 1 , 5 5 2 . 0 0 $ 1 8 5 , 3 3 5 . 0 0 $ 2b 1 0 0 0 0 g a l E m u l s i o n , C R S ( P i c k u p b y C i t y ) 3 . 0 0 $ 3 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 . 4 8 $ 2 4 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ To t a l 1 & 2 & 2 b 22 1 , 5 5 2 . 0 0 $ 2 1 0 , 1 3 5 . 0 0 $ Qu a r t e r l y E s t i m a t e s It e m E s t . U n i t T o t a l U n i t T o t a l No . Q t y . U n i t D e s c r i p t i o n P r i c e P r i c e P r i c e P r i c e 1 3 3 0 0 0 g a l E m u l s i o n , H F R S ( D e l i v e r e d ) $ 2 . 9 5 9 7 , 3 5 0 . 0 0 $ $ 3 . 2 1 1 0 5 , 8 2 1 . 1 0 $ 2 6 6 0 0 g a l E m u l s i o n , C R S ( D e l i v e r e d ) 2 . 8 9 5 2 $ 1 9 , 1 0 8 . 3 2 $ 2 . 7 5 $ 1 8 , 1 7 2 . 4 4 $ To t a l 1 & 2 11 6 , 4 5 8 . 3 2 $ 1 2 3 , 9 9 3 . 5 4 $ 2b 6 6 0 0 g a l E m u l s i o n , C R S ( P i c k u p b y C i t y ) 2 . 7 5 $ 1 8 , 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ 2 . 4 8 $ 1 6 , 3 6 8 . 0 0 $ To t a l 1 & 2 & 2 b 13 4 , 6 0 8 . 3 2 $ 1 4 0 , 3 6 1 . 5 4 $ Ce r t i f i c a t i o n Y Y Ex c e p t i o n s N Y Do e s n o t g u a r a n t e e p r i c e s . Mi n i m u m o r d e r 5 , 0 0 0 g a l l o n s De m u r r a g e C h a r g e o f $ 8 0 . 0 0 / h r . a f t e r 2 f r e e h o u r s An n u a l E s t i m a t e s EM U L S I F I E D A S P H A L T P R O D U C T S BI D T A B U L A T I O N # 0 8 - 8 9 PU B L I C W O R K S - S T R E E T S 20 September 11, 2008 Consent Agenda Item No. 2g F&B Road Speed Zone To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Mark Smith, Director of Public Works Agenda Caption: Presentation, possible action, and discussion on consideration of an ordinance amending Chapter 10, “Traffic Code,” which creates an operational speed limit on F&B Road between FM 2818 and Turkey Creek Road. Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of the ordinance. Summary: There is currently no posted speed limit on this section of roadway. Local streets with no posted speed limit have a 30 mph speed limit. In response to citizen requests staff initiated the process of setting a speed limit. In July, a speed study was conducted on F&B Road between FM 2818 and Turkey Creek Road. The Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices stipulates that the speed limit for a roadway be based on the 85th percentile speed, which is the speed that 85 percent of the vehicles are traveling at or below. At the conclusion of the study, the 85th percentile speed of the roadway was determined to be 40 mph. Budget & Financial Summary: The “Speed Limit” signs are planned operation and maintenance expenses accounted for in the Public Works Traffic Operation budget. Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2. Map 21 O/group/legal/ordinance/amendmentform.doc ORDINANCE NO. ___________ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10, “TRAFFIC CODE”, OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS AS SET OUT BELOW; ESTABLISING A SPEED LIMIT OF 40 MPH ALONG A PORTION OF F&B ROAD NEAR ITS INTERSECTION WITH FM 2818 TO ITS INTERSECTION OF TURKEY CREEK ROAD; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That Chapter 10, “Traffic Code”, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and made a part of this ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: That if any provisions of any section of this ordinance shall be held to be void or unconstitutional, such holding shall in no way effect the validity of the remaining provisions or sections of this ordinance, which shall remain in full force and effect. PART 3: That any person, firm, or corporation violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than Twenty-five Dollars ($25.00) nor more than Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00). Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. Said Ordinance, being a penal ordinance, becomes effective ten (10) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by Section 35 of the Charter of the City of College Station. PASSED, ADOPTED and APPROVED this _________ day of ____________________, 2008. APPROVED: _________________________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: _______________________________ City Secretary APPROVED: E-Signed by Mary Ann Powell VERIFY authenticity with ApproveIt _______________________________ City Attorney 22 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 2 c\p:\group\agen-cal\for legal review\in review\09-11-08\speed limit - f&b road\ordinance.doc 9/2/08 EXHIBIT “A” That Chapter 10, “Traffic Code”, Section 3.E(2)(i), of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended, by modifying paragraph (7), as set out hereafter to read as follows: “(7) F&B Road, for traffic moving east and west, the speed limit shall be 40 mph from the intersection of FM 2818 and F&B Road to the intersection of Turkey Creek Road and F&B Road.” 23 24 September 11, 2008 Consent Agenda Item No. 2h Old Wellborn Road Speed Zone To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Mark Smith, Director of Public Works Agenda Caption: Presentation, possible action, and discussion on consideration of an ordinance amending Chapter 10, “Traffic Code,” which creates an operational speed limit on Old Wellborn Road. Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of the ordinance. Summary: There is currently no posted speed limit on this section of roadway. Local streets with no posted speed limit have a 30 mph speed limit. In response to citizen requests staff initiated the process of setting a speed limit. In July, a speed study was conducted on Old Wellborn Road. The Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices stipulates that the speed limit for a roadway be based on the 85th percentile speed, which is the speed that 85 percent of the vehicles are traveling at or below. At the conclusion of the study, the 85th percentile speed of the roadway was determined to be 45 mph. Budget & Financial Summary: The “Speed Limit” signs are planned operation and maintenance expenses accounted for in the Public Works Traffic Operation budget. Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2. Map 25 O/group/legal/ordinance/amendmentform.doc ORDINANCE NO. ________ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10, “TRAFFIC CODE”, OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS AS SET OUT BELOW; ESTABLISHING A SPEED LIMIT OF 45 MPH FOR VEHICULAR TRAFFIC ALONG A PORTION OF WELLBORN ROAD NEAR ITS MOST NORTHERLY END TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH GRAHAM ROAD; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That Chapter 10, “Traffic Code”, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and made a part of this ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: That if any provisions of any section of this ordinance shall be held to be void or unconstitutional, such holding shall in no way effect the validity of the remaining provisions or sections of this ordinance, which shall remain in full force and effect. PART 3: That any person, firm, or corporation violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than Twenty-five Dollars ($25.00) nor more than Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00). Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. Said Ordinance, being a penal ordinance, becomes effective ten (10) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by Section 35 of the Charter of the City of College Station. PASSED, ADOPTED and APPROVED this _________ day of ____________________, 2008. APPROVED: _________________________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: _______________________________ City Secretary APPROVED: E-Signed by Mary Ann Powell VERIFY authenticity with ApproveIt _______________________________ City Attorney 26 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 2 c\p:\group\agen-cal\for legal review\in review\09-11-08\speed limit - old wellborn road\ordinance.doc 9/2/08 EXHIBIT “A” That Chapter 10, “Traffic Code”, Section 3.E(2)(i), of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended, by adding paragraph (60), as set out hereafter to read as follows: “(60) Old Wellborn Road, for traffic moving north and south, the speed limit shall be 45 mph beginning at its most northern end and ending at its intersection with North Graham Road.” 27 Proposed speed limit of 45 mph Proposed Speed Limit on Old Wellborn Road C a i n R o a d W e l l b o r n R o a d 0 1,000500 Feet´ O l d W e l l b o r n R o a d R o c k P r a i r i e R o a d J o n e s - B u t l e r R o a d FM 2818 D e a c o n D r i v e Welsh Avenue 28 September 11, 2008 Consent Agenda Item No. 2i Bank Depository Agreement Extension To: Glen Brown, City Manager From: Jeff Kersten, Chief Financial Officer Agenda Caption: Discussion and possible action on extending the bank depository agreement with Citibank Texas, N.A. for one additional year. Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of the one-year renewal. Summary: The current bank depository agreement with Citibank expires on September 30, 2008. On November 22, 2005, the Council selected Citibank as the City's depository bank. The depository agreement was for three (3) years with an option for two (2) one-year renewals under the same terms and conditions and upon mutual consent of both parties. Staff requests a one-year renewal to expire on September 30, 2009. Budget & Financial Summary: The annual cost for the services provided by Citibank is not expected to exceed $45,000 annually. The expenditure for banking services is budgeted in the General Fund. The interest rate on the account is the 91-day treasury rate plus 50 basis points. Attachments: 1. Depository Contract Extension, Commercial Banking Services 29 AGREEMENT TO EXTEND THE DEPOSITORY CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS AND CITIBANK TEXAS, N.A. WHEREAS, the City of College Station, Texas entered into a Depository Contract (the "Contract") with Citibank Texas, N.A., on November 22,2005; and WHEREAS, the tern of the Contract expires on September 30,2008; and WHEREAS, the terms of the Contract permit the parties to extend, by written agreement, the Contract up to two (2) additional terms with each term not to exceed one (1) year; and WHEREAS, the Contract provides that the original terms and conditions will apply to any extension; and WHEREAS, the City of College Station, Texas and Citibank Texas, N.A., desire to extend the Contract for one (1) additional term to expire on September 30,2009; now, therefore, FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the recitations above and the covenants expressed herein below, the parties agree to the following: A. Citibank Texas, N.A., Depository, located at 11 11 Briarcrest, Bryan, Texas 77802, Brazos County, State of Texas, and the City of College Station agree to extend the Contract for an additional one (1) yearterrn from October 1,2008, to September 30,2009, (the "one [1] year extension"). B. The parties agree that the original terms and conditions of the Contract will apply to the one (1 ) year extension. C. The parties agree that the rate(s) set under the original Contract will apply to the one (1) year extension. EXECUTED this the day of ,2008. CITIBANK TEXAS, N.A., BRYAN, TEXAS CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS BY: Mayor 1 PcIGROUPMGEN-CALlFor Legal RevieHVn Revieiv\O8-2&08\Ci1ibank Depository RenewaYCiribank- Depository- Renewal 2008.doc 30 ATTEST: City Secretary APPROVED: Citv Manager I City Attorney Chief Financial Officer THE STATE OF TEXAS ) 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENT COLMTY OF BRAZOS ) This instrument was acknowledged before -AMUMK)RD w-~6u wbnlber 30,2010 THE STATE OF TEXAS ) 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENT COLMTY OF BRAZOS ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on this the - day of A 2008, by as Mayor of the CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, a Texas Home-Rule Municipal Corporation, on its behalf Notary Public in and for the State of Texas 2 P:\GROUPMGEN-CAL\For Legal Revieifln ReviewlO8-28-08ICitibank Depository Rene~vaYCitibank - Depository- Renewal 2008.doc 31 September 11, 2008 Consent Agenda Item No. 2j Adamson Lagoon Swimming Pool Bathhouse Replacement Project To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: David Schmitz, Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation Agenda Caption: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding acceptance of Bid Proposal from Bid # 08-76, to JaCody, Inc., in the amount of $1,141,179, for construction of a new bathhouse at the Adamson Lagoon Swimming Pool. Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of bid to the low bidder, JaCody, Inc., for the construction of a new bathhouse at Adamson Lagoon Swimming Pool, including the base bid and all alternates, in the amount of $1,141,179. Summary: This project is for the demolition of the existing bathhouse and construction of a new bathhouse at the Adamson Lagoon Swimming Pool, located in Bee Creek Park. The scope of the project includes the demolition of the existing bathhouse, site preparation, a structural slab, general construction, plumbing, electrical, gas, mechanical work, landscaping and irrigation. On August 11, 2008, three bids were received in response to Bid #08-76. The low bidder was JaCody, Inc., in the amount of $1,141,179 (base bid of $1,023,464 plus all alternates in the amount of $117,715). History on this project is that bids were first solicited in October 2007. At that time, the bids exceeded the budgeted project amount ($900,000 available vs. $ 1,059,650 low base bid), and were rejected. The project scope was revised, and the building size reduced from 5,400sf to 3,958sf. This revised scope is the current project that bids were solicited for. In order to move forward with the project and avoid further price increases, staff is recommending accepting the low bid and adjusting the budgeted amount for the project. The budget adjustment will come from the CO debt issued for the Thomas Swimming Pool Bathhouse Replacement Project that is currently in design. A revised project scope and additional replacement monies for the Thomas Swimming Pool Bathhouse will be sought during the FY09 budget year. The Thomas Swimming Pool Bathhouse Construction project will be postponed for now. Budget & Financial Summary: Funds in the amount of $1,030,000 are budgeted for the Adamson Pool Bath House project in the Parks and Recreation Capital Improvement Projects Fund. Design fees for the project total $90,000. Asbestos abatement, advertising, Accessibility Access Inspection, and a project sign are additional expenses estimated at $10,000. This will leave a balance of approximately $930,000. The difference between this amount and the low bid of $1,141,179 is $211,179. The CO debt issued for the Thomas Pool Bathhouse Replacement Project is $333,000. $33,000 of these funds have been expended or committed for design. It is proposed that a portion of the remaining funds be used to cover the shortfall on the Adamson Pool Bath House project. The full budget for the Thomas Park Pool Bath House project has not yet been appropriated and the remaining appropriation, in the amount of $300,000 will be included on the upcoming FY08 budget amendment, after which point, a portion of the appropriation will be transferred to the Adamson Swimming Pool Bathhouse Replacement Project. Note: The CO debt language is such that the monies can be spent on either or both of these projects. Attachments: 1) Resolution 2) Bid Tabulation #08-76 3) Location Map 32 9/5/2008 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, APPROVING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE ADAMSON LAGOON SWIMMING POOL BATHHOUSE REPLACEMENT PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS. WHEREAS, the City of College Station, Texas, solicited proposals for the Adamson Lagoon Swimming Pool Bathhouse Replacement Project; and WHEREAS, the selection of JaCody, Inc., is being recommended as the lowest responsible bidder for the services related to the Adamson Lagoon Swimming Pool Bathhouse Replacement Project; now, therefore BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That the City Council hereby finds that JaCody, Inc., is the lowest responsible bidder. PART 2: That the City Council hereby approves the contract with JaCody, Inc., for the Base Bid with Alternate Bids 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 for a total of $1,141,179.00 for the labor, materials, and equipment required for the Adamson Lagoon Swimming Pool Bathhouse Replacement Project. PART 3: That the funding for this Contract shall be as budgeted from the Parks Capital Improvement Projects Fund in the amount of $1,141,179.00. PART 4: That this resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its passage. ADOPTED this day of , A.D. 2008. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary MAYOR APPROVED: E-Signed by Carla A. Robinson VERIFY authenticity with ApproveIt City Attorney 33 ADAMSON POOL BATH HOUSE REPLACEMENT BID TABULATION 08-76 PARKS RECREATION Description Unit Price Unit Price Unit Price The amount for the complete construction of A New Building for Adamson Lagoon, for the City of College Station, Including all general, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical work indicated on the Drawings. $1,023,464.00 $1,122,900.00 $1,142,000.00 Alternates The amount for the purchase and installation of concession griddle and exhaust hood as described in both the drawings and specifications.$12,547.00 $15,600.00 $14,400.00 The amount for the complete purchase and installation of interior cabinets and horizontal er blins at indicated rooms as descibed in both the drawings and specifications.$66,100.00 $42,800.00 $35,000.00 The amount for the complete purchase and installation of rolling shutters at windows as described in both the drawings and specifications.$7,707.00 $8,600.00 $6,440.00 The amount for the complete purchase and installation of tile in the toliet, shower, and dressing areas as described in both the drawings and specifications.$24,852.00 $16,300.00 $20,400.00 The amount for the complete purchase and installation of rolling service door as described in both the drawings and specifications.$6,509.00 $6,500.00 $6,650.00 OTHER ADDITIONS TO THE WORK/UNIT PRICES Drilled Piers Per Lineal Foot $20.00 $7.00 $9.00 Lime Stabilized Subgrade Per Square Yard $6.30 $6.00 $6.75 Cement Stabilized Subgrade Per Square Yard $7.50 $6.00 $6.75 1-1/2" Gas Line Per Linear Foot $12.00 $5.00 $5.50 Base Bid $1,023,464.00 $1,122,900.00 $1,142,000.00 Alternate 1 $12,547.00 $15,600.00 $14,400.00 Alternate 2 $66,100.00 $42,800.00 $35,000.00 Alternate 3 $7,707.00 $8,600.00 $6,440.00 Alternate 4 $24,852.00 $16,300.00 $20,400.00 Alternate 5 $6,509.00 $6,500.00 $6,650.00 Base Bid plus Alternates 1 thru 5 $1,141,179.00 $1,212,700.00 $1,224,890.00 Bid Certification Yes Yes Yes Total Calendar Days to Substantial Completion 240 240 210 Bid Bond Yes Yes Yes Addendums Acknowledged 1 1 1 Dudley Construction, Inc. Unit Price No. 1 Unit Price No. 2 Base Bid No.1 JaCody, Inc.Bryan Construction Company Unit Price No. 3 Unit Price No. 4 Alternate No. 1 Alternate No. 2 Alternate No. 3 Alternate No. 4 Alternate No. 5 Page 134 35 September 11, 2008 Consent Agenda Item No. 2k Renewal of a Landscape Maintenance Service Contract For Thirty-One (31) Municipal Sites To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Marco A. Cisneros, Director, Parks and Recreation Agenda Caption: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Renewal Agreement for an Annual Landscape Maintenance Service Contract for thirty-one (31) sites comprised of municipal buildings, municipal sites, parks, and street medians to Green Teams, Inc. (d.b.a., The Greenery) for an annual expenditure of $312,852.75. Recommendation(s): Staff recommends renewing the existing Landscape Maintenance Service Contract in the amount of $312,852.75. Summary: Green Teams, Inc. was the lowest responsible bidder on Bid #06-121 in July 2006. The bid amount of $297,463.00 was for all materials, machinery, equipment, supervision and labor necessary to commence and complete normal turf, ornamental plantings, and irrigation system maintenance operations for thirty-one (31) locations throughout the City. The original term of the contract was October 1, 2006 through September 30, 2007. This Renewal Agreement will cover operations from October 1, 2008 through September 30, 2009. This is the second of two allowed renewals specified in the contract. The Renewal Agreement includes following existing Change Orders: Change Order #1 added two lots on Georgia Street. Change Order #2 added the Providence Church Historical site. Change Order #3 deletes the F.M. 2818/F.M. 60 site and the Georgia Street lots. Change Orders 1, 2 and 3 were approved by the City Manager and/or Department Director. With these existing Change Orders, the total number of sites under this contract remains at 31. Finally, the vendor has requested a 5% increase in pricing, which is allowed by the contract. No price increase was requested with the first renewal period. Locations covered by this contract include: 1. Arts Council 11. G. Bush Dr. Medians 21. Providence Church Site 2. Business Center 12. G. Bush Dr. East 22. Public Works 3. Castlegate Parks 13. Greens Prairie Medians 23. Rock Prairie Medians 4. City Hall/Community Dev. 14. Hereford/Winding Median 24. Tarrow Medians 5. Fire Station #1 15. Krenek Tap Crossing 25. Texas Avenue Phase I 6. Fire Station #2 16. Library 26. Unity Plaza 7. Fire Station #3 17. Municipal Court 27. University Dr. Medians 8. Fire Station #5 18. Northgate Garage 28. Utility Customer Service 9. FM 2818 Crepe Myrtles 19. Northgate Promenade 29. Utility Service Center 10. Freeman Tract 20. Police Dept-Cy Miller Park 30. WPC Park 31. WPC Trails Original Base Bid $297,463.00 Change Order #1: $780.00 Change Order #2: $2,312.00 Change Order #3: ($2,600.00) 5% increase with renewal: $14,897.75 Total $312,852.75 Budget & Financial Summary: Funding for the thirty-one (31) sites included in this Renewal Agreement has been included in the proposed FY 08-09 Budget in the General Fund - Parks and Recreation Department; Hotel Occupancy Tax Fund - Parks and Recreation Department; and the Electric Fund - Public Utilities Department. Attachments: 1. Renewal Agreement Form 36 37 38 September 11, 2008 Consent Agenda Item No. 2l Change Order #4 on an Existing Landscape Maintenance Service Contract To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Marco A. Cisneros, Director, Parks and Recreation Agenda Caption: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Change Order to an existing Landscape Maintenance Service Contract with Green Teams, Inc. (d.b.a. The Greenery), in the amount of $30,423.00, to add the annual landscape maintenance functions for Cove of Nantucket Park, Fire Station #3B, Texas Avenue Phase II, and additional maintenance areas for W.D. Fitch Parkway. Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approving Change Order #4, in the amount of $30,423.00. Summary: Green Teams, Inc. is the current service provider for the annual landscape maintenance functions on thirty-one (31) municipal sites. Change Order #4 will add three sites and additional maintenance functions for a current site to this existing contract. The new sites include Cove of Nantucket Park, Fire Station #3B, and Texas Avenue Phase II. Additional mow, trim, and clean-up functions will be added to the existing W.D. Fitch Parkway site. Contract #06-261 requires that Change Orders greater than $25,000.00 must be approved by the City Council. Budget & Financial Summary: Funding for the sites included in Change Order #4 has been included in the proposed FY 08-09 Budget in the General Fund - Parks and Recreation Department. Original Base Bid: $297,463.00 Change Order #1: $780.00 Change Order #2: $2,312.00 Change Order #3: ($2,600.00) 5% increase with renewal: $14,897.75 Current contract amount as of 9/11/2008 renewal: $312,852.75 Change Order #4: $30,423.00 New contract amount: $343,275.75 Change Order #4, in the amount of $30,423.00, is a 9.724% increase over the current contract amount of $312,852.75, as renewed on September 11, 2008, that included Change Orders 1, 2, and 3. Attachments: 1. Change Order Form 39 40 September 11, 2008 Consent Agenda Item No. 2m Project Number GG0402 Change Order No. 4 for the Police Department Renovations To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Chuck Gilman, Director of Capital Projects Agenda Caption: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a change order to Contract #07-273 in the amount of $28,526.68 to JaCody, Inc. for construction work associated with Police Department Renovations Project. Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of this item. Summary: The renovations of the Police Department will be completed in 5 separate phases. During the demolition portion of the third phase of construction, demolition of an existing wall revealed a four (4) inch diameter electrical conduit that had not been noted on existing plans of the building. Examination of the conduit by the architect, contractor and City staff yielded the conclusion that the conduit could not be moved or removed from the location it occupied. This required the architect to redesign the third phase of the project. The contractor is seeking a change in material quantities and contract time associated with the redesign of the third phase of the project. Work on the building exterior has revealed the need for additional quantities of conduit for exterior electrical connections and a different transfer switch for the new emergency generators than was originally specified in the architect’s plans. Additionally, the contractor has offered to fill the generators with diesel fuel and the City’s purchasing Department has given them the appropriate tax free paperwork information to do so. Additionally, as prior phases have become occupied needs have been found in those areas including replacing thermostats that were not removed with the renovations for better environmental controls, replacing vent grilles in the men’s and women’s restrooms that remained in place but are having functional conflicts due to the new ceiling heights and the need to add more secure door access features to closets that will be used for storing sensitive Police hardware. Budget & Financial Summary: Funds are budgeted and available in the General Government Capital Projects Fund as part of the Police Department Renovations Project. The current project budget is $3,686,000.00. Funds in the amount of $2,863,572.08 have been expended or committed to date. In addition, a construction contract in the amount of $104,471.45 is pending Council approval, which would leave a balance of $717,956.47. Attachments: 1. Change Order No. 4 41 - -~ P.O.# 080210 PROJECT: Police Department Renovations, Project No. GG0402 .............. ............. :. ..... . : : ........... .............. .......................... ...................... :.:::::.: :::::_:.: .: ....... :.:.:.::.:.. : :.:::.:.. ... ..................... :.:.:.:.:.:.:..: ..:::..... ......... : ......:. .................... OWNER: CONTRACTOR: City of College Station P 0. Box 9960 JaCody, Inc. 11070 SH 30 Suite 400 Ph: 1979) 774-5613 ......... College Station, Texas 77842 ~olle~~~tation TX 77840 ax. (979) 774-5693 PURPOSE OF THIS CHANGE ORDER: A. Phase lll~edesiqn: Demolition of the second floor of the Police Department, as part of the on going renovations project, yielded the discovery of a previously unknown four (4) inch electrical conduit in one of the existing walls. The planned renovation would have placed this conduit, which could not be relocated, in the middle of the proposed office space. This required the architect and the contractor to work together to redesign the third phase of the renovat~ons without costing a loss of significant time to the construction activities. While reviewing the Phase Ill design elements during the redesign, concerns were raised by P.D. staff about the lack of a slip proof surface on the northeast stairwell, a highly traveled area by staff members. The concern was that on rainy days the amount of water brought into to this area would cause a slipping risk. The solution arrived at is to install of rubbertreading underfoot (Item 45G). The redesign of Phase Ill changes the functionality of a few areas due to space and room size changes while adding some additional space. Items 45H. 451,45J, and 45K represent the need to change the electrical plan due to the redesign by adding electrical receptacles, two television receptacles, relocating electrical receptacles and additional emergency power receptacles. An additional forty-six feet of wall are to be added as part of the redesign (Item 45M), three additional doors and door frames (Item 45N) and one double door and frame (Item 450) are planned to be added Also, an interior double acting door near the northeast comer of Phase Ill with transom frames and sides is to be added to the design to prevent noise from other work areas from crossing over into administrative office areas (Item 45E). B. Exterior Work: Work on the exterior of the P.D. building includes relocating a storage shed that was adjacent to the existing generator area to the eastern fence line. In order to maintain power to this storage shed, it has been discovered that the planned electrical hook ups will require a new pull box and some additional conduit. (Item 45D). Review of the transfer switch planned for the new generator enclosure has revealed that an N3 style enclosure will be the preferred and recommended type as opposed to the planned N1 enclosure for the switch (Item 45F). The installation of the new generators requires low sulfur diesel fuel to be purchased. The contractor has offered to purchase and fill the generators and the City's purchasing department has given them the appropriate tax free paper work to do so. Item 45L will allow for the contractor to do so and provide full generator tanks upon installation. C. Additional Work in Previous Phases: With Police staff inhabiting previously competed phases some new items have been brought to the attention of P.D. administrative staff. The first is the failure of the existing thermostats (which were left in place) to function properly with the new environmental system. Replacing these thermostats with new pneumatic thermostats will allow staff to be able to have a much improved control over the settings of the office area environmental systems (Item 45A). In addition to the thermostats, restroom grilles will be replaced to improve environmental system function (Item 45B). The grilles, located in the men's and women's restrooms, which remained in place, are not functioning properly with the raised ceilings. New grilles will solve this mechanical problem (Item 458). Also, due to the materials and equipment to be kept certain office and closet space, to be in accordance with the security key plan, doors 24 & 65 will require the instllation of rim panics and core cylinder housing. (Item 45C). ID. Additional Time: The contractor has requested additional time due to the Phase Ill redesign. They have requested seven (7) days for wall redesign and additional wall placement and construction. The contractor has also requested twenty-three (23) days for redesigning the electrical plan and layout for Phase Ill due to the need to wait on the redesign and order additional material that is not on hand and that was not on original plans due to the redesign caused by the discovery of the four (4) inch electrical conduit. ,TEM UNFT ORIGINAL REVISED ADDED NO UNIT .- DESCRETION - PRICE QUANTlTY -QUANTITY -0°C I,. I COST n I 7 I *JL". I0 I I I I " QL,LO, .J. .,----.., 8,-..,:,..,:-.. P- ille in Restroom 1 $1,806.65 1 O I I $1.806.6! . U-,.-:..- <-- n,.... ?A o cr I -4 1-9 m I n I CI 177 ZI Replo~olllcln vr;llllldlguII -- - 45C I EA IR m Pan~cs &Core Cyl.noel , luUDlllY lul YUuIJ LLt I I l lnstallatlon ot pull box and extension ot cond, t to fence llne tor ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT Change Order No. 1 Change Order No. 2 Change Order No. 3 Change Order No. 4 REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT $2,247.634.00 $3,645.35 0.16% CHANGE $23,957.64 1.07% CHANGE $4,238.90 0.19% CHANGE $28,526.68 1.27% CHANGE $2,308,002.57 2.69% TOTAL CHANGE ORIGINAL CONTRACT TIME Time Extension No. 1 Revised Contract Time 270 Days 30 Days 300 Days 1 SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION DATE 22-Oct-08 /> -.&ate CHIEF E CONTRACTOR Date C1 TORNEY " Date ' Y MAYOR Date CITY SECRETARY Date CITY MANAGER Date 42 September 11, 2008 Consent Agenda Item No. 2n College Park/Breezy Heights Rehabilitation Project To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Chuck Gilman, Director of Capital Improvement Department Agenda Caption: Presentation, possible action and discussion regarding adoption of a resolution awarding contract #08-277 for the College Park/Breezy Heights Rehabilitation Project to Brazos Valley Services in the amount of $4,116,581.28. Recommendation(s): Staff recommends Council adopt this resolution. Summary: The College Park/Breezy Heights Rehabilitation Project provides for the construction and rehabilitation of water, waster water, drainage and street surface infrastructure in the Southside area of College Station. The project area is bounded by George Bush Drive, West Dexter, Hereford St, Holleman Dr., Fairview Ave, Eleanor St, and Montclair Ave. During the design phase, staff developed an extensive neighborhood engagement process to ensure feedback and comments from the community were included in the design, including a tree preservation plan. Budget & Financial Summary: Bid #08-85 resulted in two bids being received for the opportunity to provide construction services for the College Park/Breezy Heights Rehabilitation Project. Examination of the base bids in conjunction with the alternate and additive bids found that funds were budgeted and available to include Alternate Bids 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 and Additive Bids 1,2,3,4,5,6. These items were then calculated into the bid amount to arrive the total amount of expenditures for the contract to be issued to the contractor. A summary of the bid results is provided below: Bidder Base Bid Amount With Alternates and Additives Brazos Valley Services $3,858,830.98 $4,116,581.28 Knife River $4,043,260.20 $4,360,141.30 This project is a component of the ongoing Southside Rehabilitation projects. The total budget for the project is $5,851,545.00. $1,640,000.00 is budgeted in the Water Capital Improvement Projects Fund and $1,305,000.00 is budgeted in the Wastewater Capital Improvement Projects Fund for replacement of water and wastewater lines. $2,463,020.00 is budgeted in the Streets Capital Projects Fund. $443,525.00 is budgeted in the Drainage Capital Improvements Projects Fund. $262,341.70 of the Streets Capital funds have been expended or committed to date, leaving a balance of $2,200,678.29 for the construction of the sidewalks and rehabilitation of the streets. $33,600.00 of the Drainage Capital Funds have been expended or committed to date, leaving a balance of $409,925.00 for the construction of drainage improvements. $109,537.57 of the Water Capital Improvements funds have been expended or committed to date, leaving a balance of $1,530,462.43 for the construction and rehabilitation of water infrastructure. $113,934.14 of the Wastewater Capital Improvement funds have been expended or committed to date, leaving a balance of $1,191,065.86 for the construction and rehabilitation of wastewater infrastructure. Attachments: 1.) Resolution 2.) Bid #08-85 Bid Tab – Available in the City Secretary’s Office 3.) Project Location Map 43 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M D E S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L BA S E B I D A. G E N E R A L S I T E W O R K I T E M S 1 Mo b i l i z a t i o n , s e t u p , & p r o j e c t o v e r h e a d f o r a l l e q u i p m e n t , w o r k o n p r o j e c t , in c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e . 1 L S $ 2 5 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 Tr a f f i c c o n t r o l , i n c l u d i n g a l l s i g n a g e , t e m p o r a r y p a v i n g , c o n t i n u o u s a c c e s s t o re s i d e n c e s , t e m p o r a r y A D A r a m p s , w i t h r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1 L S $ 7 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 Tr e n c h s a f e t y & c o n f i n e d s p a c e p l a n p r e p a r e d b y T e x a s R e g i s t e r e d E n g i n e e r fo r e x c a v a t i o n s e x c e e d i n g 5 ' i n d e p t h , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1 L S $ 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 4 Si t e c l e a n - u p i n c l u d i n g t o p s o i l r e p l a c e m e n t , f i n a l g r a d i n g f r o m r i g h t - o f - w a y t o ba c k o f c u r b , & s o d d i n g o f a l l a r e a s d i s t u r b e d b y c o n s t r u c t i o n , c o m p l e t e i n pl a c e 1 L S $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 T r e e p r e s e r v a t i o n a n d p r o t e c t i o n 1 L S $ 2 2 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 2 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 Fi e l d v e r i f y s e r v i c e l i n e t i e i n t o r e s i d e n c e a n d i n s t a l l s e r v i c e l i n e f r o m m e t e r t o re s i d e n c e p l u m b i n g c o n n e c t i o n b y l i c e n s e d p l u m b e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1 L S $ 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 TO T A L S E C T I O N A - G E N E R A L S I T E W O R K I T E M S $6 6 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 1 2 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 B. D E M O L I T I O N I T E M S 7 Re m o v e & D i s p o s e o f e x i s t i n g c o n c r e t e & a s p h a l t p a v e m e n t i n c l u d i n g b a s e ma t e r i a l , c u r b , s a w c u t s , r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1 L S $ 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 8 Re m o v e & D i s p o s e o f e x i s t i n g d r a i n a g e i t e m s i n c l u d i n g c u l v e r t s , c u r b i n l e t s , ju n c t i o n b o x e s , s t o r m s e w e r s , a n d r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1 L S $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 9 Re m o v e & D e l i v e r f i r e h y d r a n t a s s e m b l i e s t o C i t y o f C o l l e g e S t a t i o n P u b l i c Ut i l i t i e s S h o p i n c l u d i n g c a p o n e x i s t i n g w a t e r l i n e w / r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 8 E A $ 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $2 3 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 3 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 C. P A V I N G & D R A I N A G E I T E M S 10 RO W p r e p a r a t i o n f o r i m p r o v e d s t r e e t s i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 28 S T A $ 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 5 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 11 6" l i m e s t a b i l i z e d s u b g r a d e w i t h m i n i m u m o f 6 % l i m e b y w e i g h t c o m p a c t e d t o an a p p a r e n t d r y d e n s i t y o f 9 8 % A S T M D 6 9 8 s t a n d a r d p r o c t o r d e n s i t y @ op t i m u m m o i s t u r e c o n t e n t , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e 9, 3 3 6 S Y $ 4 . 0 0 $ 3 7 , 3 4 4 . 0 0 $ 3 . 3 5 $ 3 1 , 2 7 5 . 6 0 12 L i m e f o r s u b g r a d e s t a b i l i z a t i o n ( 2 7 l b s / S Y ) , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1 2 6 T O N S $ 1 5 7 . 0 0 $ 1 9 , 7 8 2 . 0 0 $ 1 6 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 , 1 6 0 . 0 0 13 MC - 3 0 A s p h a l t p r i m e c o a t ( 0 . 3 G A L / S Y ) , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 5, 8 3 9 S Y $ 2 . 0 0 $ 1 1 , 6 7 8 . 0 0 $ 1 . 6 0 $ 9 , 3 4 2 . 4 0 14 2" T Y P E D H M A C a s p h a l t p a v e m e n t , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 5, 8 3 9 S Y $ 1 1 . 0 0 $ 6 4 , 2 2 9 . 0 0 $ 1 1 . 7 0 $ 6 8 , 3 1 6 . 3 0 TO T A L S E C T I O N B - D E M O L I T I O N I T E M S Br a z o s V a l l e y S e r v i c e s K n i f e R i v e r C o n s t r u c t i o n 1 44 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M D E S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L Br a z o s V a l l e y S e r v i c e s K n i f e R i v e r C o n s t r u c t i o n 15 5" T Y P E C H M A C a s p h a l t p a v e m e n t , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 5, 8 3 9 S Y $ 2 7 . 0 0 $ 1 5 7 , 6 5 3 . 0 0 $ 2 7 . 8 0 $ 1 6 2 , 3 2 4 . 2 0 16 Re i n f o r c e d c o n c r e t e c u r b & g u t t e r , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e 4, 5 4 3 L F $ 1 0 . 8 6 $ 4 9 , 3 3 6 . 9 8 $ 1 3 . 6 0 $ 6 1 , 7 8 4 . 8 0 17 E x i s t i n g l i g h t p o l e t o b e r e m o v e d a n d r e s e t , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 6 E A $ 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 6 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 18 E x i s t i n g p o w e r p o l e t o b e r e m o v e d a n d r e s e t , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 3 E A $ 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 . 0 0 $ 3 . 0 0 19 6" r e i n f o r c e d c o n c r e t e p a v i n g , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 5 4 5 S Y $ 3 8 . 0 0 $ 5 8 , 7 1 0 . 0 0 $ 4 8 . 0 0 $ 7 4 , 1 6 0 . 0 0 20 6" d o w e l o n c u r b i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n pl a c e 69 1 L F $ 5 . 0 0 $ 3 , 4 5 5 . 0 0 $ 5 . 0 0 $ 3 , 4 5 5 . 0 0 21 4" r e i n f o r c e d 6 ' c o n c r e t e s i d e w a l k p a v i n g i n c l u d i n g A D A h a n d i c a p r a m p s a n d su b g r a d e c o m p a c t i o n t o 9 8 % s t a n d a r d p r o c t o r d e n s i t y @ o p t i m u m m o i s t u r e co n t e n t , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 5 9 4 S Y $ 3 6 . 0 0 $ 5 7 , 3 8 4 . 0 0 $ 3 8 . 0 0 $ 6 0 , 5 7 2 . 0 0 22 Re s i d e n t i a l r e i n f o r c e d c o n c r e t e d r i v e w a y t u r n o u t ( w i d t h s v a r y ) i n c l u d i n g re l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 60 8 S Y $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 2 4 , 3 2 0 . 0 0 $ 9 5 . 0 0 $ 5 7 , 7 6 0 . 0 0 23 Re m o v e a n d d i s p o s e o f e x i s t i n g h e a d a n d w i n g w a l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s an d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e ( S h e e t C 4 . 2 1 ) 1 E A $ 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 0 0 . 0 0 24 Ty p e " B " c u r b i n l e t ( R E : D e t a i l ) i n c l u d i n g t o p , r i n g , l i d , g r o u t i n g o f b o t t o m & st o r m s e w e r w / r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 4 E A $ 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 7 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 25 Ty p e " C " c u r b i n l e t ( R E : D e t a i l ) i n c l u d i n g t o p , r i n g , l i d , g r o u t i n g o f b o t t o m & st o r m s e w e r w / r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1 E A $ 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 26 Re m o v e a n d d i s p o s e o f e x i s t i n g R C P p i p e , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 24 7 L F $ 2 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 9 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 8 . 0 0 $ 4 , 4 4 6 . 0 0 27 Co n c r e t e j u n c t i o n b o x i n c l u d i n g t o p , r i n g , l i d , g r o u t i n g o f b o t t o m & s t o r m se w e r w / r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 4 E A $ 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 28 18 " R C P s t o r m s e w e r i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n pl a c e 15 2 L F $ 7 5 . 0 0 $ 1 1 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 9 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 4 8 8 . 0 0 29 24 " R C P s t o r m s e w e r i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n pl a c e 22 9 L F $ 9 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 , 6 1 0 . 0 0 $ 8 4 . 0 0 $ 1 9 , 2 3 6 . 0 0 30 30 " R C P s t o r m s e w e r i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n pl a c e 41 3 L F $ 1 1 0 . 0 0 $ 4 5 , 4 3 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 9 . 0 0 $ 4 5 , 0 1 7 . 0 0 31 36 " R C P s t o r m s e w e r i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n pl a c e 54 L F $ 1 2 5 . 0 0 $ 6 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 3 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 0 2 0 . 0 0 32 Co n n e c t p r o p o s e d R C P s t o r m s e w e r t o e x i s t i n g i n l e t b o x , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 13 E A $ 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 33 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r s t o r m s e w e r r e l a t e d i t e m s w / f u l l d e p t h c e m e n t st a b i l i z e d b a c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 13 6 L F $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 4 4 0 . 0 0 $ 3 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 0 8 0 . 0 0 2 45 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M D E S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L Br a z o s V a l l e y S e r v i c e s K n i f e R i v e r C o n s t r u c t i o n 34 Co n c r e t e p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r s t o r m s e w e r r e l a t e d i t e m s w / f u l l d e p t h c e m e n t st a b i l i z e d b a c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 27 L F $ 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 0 5 0 . 0 0 35 Re m o v e a n d d i s p o s e o f e x i s t i n g c o n c r e t e s i d e w a l k , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s an d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e ( S h e e t C 4 . 2 4 ) 42 S Y $ 1 0 . 0 0 $ 4 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 . 0 0 $ 6 3 0 . 0 0 36 As p h a l t p a v i n g f o r e x i s t i n g d r i v e w a y f o r s m o o t h t r a n s i t i o n f r o m n e w d r i v e w a y tu r n o u t t o l o c a t i o n s s h o w n o n p l a n s i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e 15 S Y $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 5 . 0 0 $ 6 7 5 . 0 0 37 Re i n f o r c e d c o n c r e t e p a v i n g ( 6 " t h i c k ) f o r e x i s t i n g d r i v e w a y f o r s m o o t h tr a n s i t i o n f r o m n e w d r i v e w a y t u r n o u t t o l o c a t i o n s s h o w n o n p l a n s i n c l u d i n g ex p a n s i o n j o i n t s , c o n t r o l j o i n t s , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e 31 7 S Y $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 1 . 0 0 $ 3 2 , 0 1 7 . 0 0 38 Re s h a p e / R e c o m p a c t e x i s t i n g g r a v e l d r i v e w a y f r o m e n d o f n e w t u r n o u t t o lo c a t i o n s s h o w n o n p l a n s f o r s m o o t h t r a n s i t i o n , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 70 S Y $ 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 $ 8 . 0 0 $ 5 6 0 . 0 0 39 Re l o c a t e / R e s e t e x i s t i n g m a i l b o x e s , s t r e e t s i g n s , a n d t r a f f i c s i g n s , i n c l u d i n g re l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 12 E A $ 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 1 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 2 0 . 0 0 40 Co n c r e t e s a f e t y e n d t r e a t m e n t f o r 3 6 " p i p e i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1 E A $ 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 41 Co n c r e t e s a f e t y e n d t r e a t m e n t f o r 1 8 " p i p e i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 2 E A $ 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 42 C o n c r e t e h e a d w a l l f o r 3 0 " p i p e , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1 E A $ 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 43 Re m o v e e x i s t i n g s t o r m s e w e r m a n h o l e a n d r e p l a c e w / 6 ' x 6 ' j u n c t i o n b o x , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1 E A $ 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 44 C o n s t r u c t 5 ' e x t e n s i o n o n e n d o f e x i s t i n g c u r b i n l e t , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1 E A $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 45 Co n c r e t e c u r b a n d g u t t e r r e p a i r i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e 30 L F $ 3 0 . 0 0 $ 9 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 46 Lo w e r e x i s t i n g w a t e r l i n e o n H e r e f o r d S t r e e t , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 30 L F $ 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 9 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 47 A s p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r 6 ' w i d e t r e n c h o n W e s t D e x t e r , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1 9 9 S Y $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 9 6 0 . 0 0 $ 4 5 . 0 0 $ 8 , 9 5 5 . 0 0 48 R o c k r u b b l e ( 1 2 " m i n i m u m d i a m e t e r ) , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 6 6 S Y $ 5 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 6 . 0 0 $ 2 , 3 7 6 . 0 0 $7 2 2 , 2 2 1 . 9 8 $ 8 5 7 , 2 2 3 . 3 0 D. W A T E R S Y S T E M I T E M S 49 12 " C - 9 0 0 P V C W a t e r l i n e i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e 2, 9 4 5 L F $ 4 5 . 0 0 $ 1 3 2 , 5 2 5 . 0 0 $ 5 7 . 0 0 $ 1 6 7 , 8 6 5 . 0 0 50 8" C - 9 0 0 P V C W a t e r l i n e i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d f i t t i n g s , i t e m s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 1 6 6 L F $ 3 7 . 0 0 $ 4 3 , 1 4 2 . 0 0 $ 4 6 . 0 0 $ 5 3 , 6 3 6 . 0 0 51 6" C - 9 0 0 P V C W a t e r l i n e i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e in p l a c e 7, 5 2 5 L F $ 3 4 . 0 0 $ 2 5 5 , 8 5 0 . 0 0 $ 3 7 . 8 0 $ 2 8 4 , 4 4 5 . 0 0 TO T A L S E C T I O N C - P A V I N G & D R A I N A G E I T E M S 3 46 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M D E S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L Br a z o s V a l l e y S e r v i c e s K n i f e R i v e r C o n s t r u c t i o n 52 4" C - 9 0 0 P V C W a t e r l i n e i n c l u d e d r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e in p l a c e 51 3 L F $ 3 2 . 0 0 $ 1 6 , 4 1 6 . 0 0 $ 3 7 . 0 0 $ 1 8 , 9 8 1 . 0 0 53 12 " g a t e v a l v e a n d b o x , i n c l u d i n g m a r k e r a n d r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 13 E A $ 1 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 3 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 9 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 54 8" g a t e v a l v e a n d b o x , i n c l u d i n g m a r k e r a n d r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 8 E A $ 1 , 0 2 5 . 0 0 $ 8 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 3 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 4 4 0 . 0 0 55 6" g a t e v a l v e a n d b o x , i n c l u d i n g m a r k e r a n d r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 37 E A $ 7 6 0 . 0 0 $ 2 8 , 1 2 0 . 0 0 $ 6 8 0 . 0 0 $ 2 5 , 1 6 0 . 0 0 56 4" g a t e v a l v e a n d b o x , i n c l u d i n g m a r k e r a n d r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 3 E A $ 6 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 9 5 0 . 0 0 $ 6 3 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 8 9 0 . 0 0 57 16 " b u t t e r f l y v a l v e , i n c l u d i n g m a r k e r a n d r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1 E A $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 58 12 " C - 9 0 0 C e r t a - L o k P V C w a t e r l i n e i n s t a l l e d b y d i r e c t i o n a l b o r i n g , c o m p l e t e in p l a c e 31 4 L F $ 9 0 . 0 0 $ 2 8 , 2 6 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 5 . 0 0 $ 3 2 , 9 7 0 . 0 0 59 8" C - 9 0 0 C e r t a - L o k P V C w a t e r l i n e i n s t a l l e d b y d i r e c t i o n a l b o r i n g , c o m p l e t e i n pl a c e 31 9 L F $ 6 0 . 0 0 $ 1 9 , 1 4 0 . 0 0 $ 7 7 . 0 0 $ 2 4 , 5 6 3 . 0 0 60 6" C - 9 0 0 C e r t a - L o k P V C w a t e r l i n e i n s t a l l e d b y d i r e c t i o n a l b o r i n g , c o m p l e t e i n pl a c e 56 1 L F $ 5 1 . 0 0 $ 2 8 , 6 1 1 . 0 0 $ 6 1 . 0 0 $ 3 4 , 2 2 1 . 0 0 61 4" Y e l l o w m i n e S D R 1 7 w a t e r l i n e i n s t a l l e d b y d i r e c t i o n a l b o r i n g i n c l u d i n g re l a t e d i t e m s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 38 5 L F $ 3 5 . 0 0 $ 1 3 , 4 7 5 . 0 0 $ 5 2 . 0 0 $ 2 0 , 0 2 0 . 0 0 62 St a n d a r d f i r e h y d r a n t a s s e m b l y i n c l u d i n g 6 " g a t e v a l v e a n d b o x , r e l a t e d fi t t i n g s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 13 E A $ 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 0 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 63 Re l o c a t e & R e c o n n e c t e x i s t i n g w a t e r m e t e r i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 88 E A $ 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 6 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 6 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 64 Lo n g w a t e r s e r v i c e t r a n s f e r i n c l u d i n g 1 " s c h e d u l e 4 0 P V C , r e l a t e d f i t t i n g s , b a l l va l v e s , c o n n e c t i o n t o e x i s t i n g m e t e r & r e l a t e d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n pl a c e 78 E A $ 1 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8 5 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 4 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 65 Lo n g d u a l w a t e r s e r v i c e t r a n s f e r i n c l u d i n g 1 1 / 2 " s c h e d u l e 4 0 P V C , r e l a t e d fi t t i n g s , b a l l v a l v e s , c o n n e c t i o n t o e x i s t i n g m e t e r & r e l a t e d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e 16 E A $ 1 , 4 2 0 . 0 0 $ 2 2 , 7 2 0 . 0 0 $ 9 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 66 Sh o r t d u a l w a t e r s e r v i c e t r a n s f e r i n c l u d i n g 1 1 / 2 " s c h e d u l e 4 0 P V C , r e l a t e d fi t t i n g s , b a l l v a l v e s , c o n n e c t i o n t o e x i s t i n g m e t e r & r e l a t e d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e 6 E A $ 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 67 Sh o r t w a t e r s e r v i c e t r a n s f e r i n c l u d i n g 1 " s c h e d u l e 4 0 P V C , r e l a t e d f i t t i n g s , ba l l v a l v e s , c o n n e c t i o n t o e x i s t i n g m e t e r & r e l a t e d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e in p l a c e 78 E A $ 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 2 0 . 0 0 $ 3 2 , 7 6 0 . 0 0 68 Di s c o n n e c t a n d c a p e x i s t i n g w a t e r l i n e s i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d f i t t i n g s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 47 E A $ 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 7 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 69 14 " s t e e l c a s i n g i n s t a l l e d b y o p e n c u t i n c l u d i n g s p a c e r s , e n d s e a l s , r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 80 L F $ 9 1 . 0 0 $ 7 , 2 8 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 70 18 " s t e e l c a s i n g i n s t a l l e d b y o p e n c u t i n c l u d i n g s p a c e r s , e n d s e a l s , r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 20 L F $ 1 0 7 . 0 0 $ 2 , 1 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 5 . 0 0 $ 2 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 4 47 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M D E S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L Br a z o s V a l l e y S e r v i c e s K n i f e R i v e r C o n s t r u c t i o n 71 20 " s t e e l c a s i n g i n s t a l l e d b y b o r e i n c l u d i n g s p a c e r s , e n d s e a l s , i n c l u d i n g re l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 62 L F $ 1 6 5 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 2 3 0 . 0 0 $ 5 6 0 . 0 0 $ 3 4 , 7 2 0 . 0 0 72 In t e r c o n n e c t p r o p o s e d 1 2 " P V C w a t e r l i n e t o e x i s t i n g 6 " w a t e r l i n e , i n c l u d i n g re l a t e d f i t t i n g a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1 E A $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 73 In t e r c o n n e c t p r o p o s e d 8 " P V C w a t e r l i n e t o e x i s t i n g 8 " w a t e r l i n e , i n c l u d i n g re l a t e d f i t t i n g a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 2 E A $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 74 In t e r c o n n e c t p r o p o s e d 6 " w a t e r l i n e t o e x i s t i n g 1 6 " w a t e r l i n e i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1 E A $ 1 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 75 In t e r c o n n e c t p r o p o s e d 8 " P V C w a t e r l i n e t o e x i s t i n g 1 2 " w a t e r l i n e , i n c l u d i n g re l a t e d f i t t i n g a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1 E A $ 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 76 In t e r c o n n e c t p r o p o s e d 1 2 " p v c w a t e r l i n e t o e x i s t i n g 1 2 " p v c w a t e r l i n e , in c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 3 E A $ 2 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 77 In t e r c o n n e c t p r o p o s e d 1 2 " w a t e r l i n e t o e x i s t i n g 1 6 " w a t e r l i n e i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d fi t t i n g s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1 E A $ 1 0 , 7 8 7 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 7 8 7 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 78 In t e r c o n n e c t p r o p o s e d 6 " p v c w a t e r l i n e t o e x i s t i n g 6 " w a t e r l i n e i n c l u d i n g re l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 7 E A $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 79 In t e r c o n n e c t p r o p o s e d 8 " p v c w a t e r l i n e t o e x i s t i n g 6 " p v c w a t e r l i n e i n c l u d i n g re l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1 E A $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 80 In t e r c o n n e c t p r o p o s e d 4 " w a t e r l i n e t o e x i s t i n g 6 " w a t e r l i n e i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1 E A $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 81 In t e r c o n n e c t p r o p o s e d 6 " p v c w a t e r l i n e t o e x i s t i n g 1 2 " p v c w a t e r l i n e i n c l u d i n g re l a t e d i t e m s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1 E A $ 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 81 A In t e r c o n n e c t p r o p o s e d 6 " p v c w a t e r l i n e t o e x i s t i n g 8 " p v c w a t e r l i n e i n c l u d i n g re l a t e d i t e m s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1 E A $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 82 Re l o c a t e & R e c o n n e c t e x i s t i n g w a t e r m e t e r f r o m b a c k o f r e s i d e n c e t o e d g e o f Ri g h t - o f - W a y i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 19 E A $ 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 83 1" s c h e d u l e 4 0 P V C w a t e r s e r v i c e l i n e f r o m r e l o c a t e d m e t e r t o e x i s t i n g re s i d e n t & p l u m b i n g i n c l u d i n g c o n n e c t i o n b y l i c e n s e d p l u m b e r i n c l u d i n g re l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e . 1, 2 4 5 L F $ 1 5 . 0 0 $ 1 8 , 6 7 5 . 0 0 $ 2 5 . 0 0 $ 3 1 , 1 2 5 . 0 0 84 1" B l o w o f f v a l v e ( F l u s h h y d r a n t ) i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1 E A $ 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 0 0 . 0 0 85 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r w a t e r r e l a t e d i t e m s w / f u l l d e p t h c e m e n t st a b i l i z e d b a c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 2, 1 1 1 L F $ 2 0 . 0 0 $ 4 2 , 2 2 0 . 0 0 $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 8 4 , 4 4 0 . 0 0 86 St r u c t u r a l b a c k f i l l f o r w a t e r r e l a t e d i t e m s w / f u l l d e p t h c e m e n t s t a b i l i z e d ba c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 96 2 L F $ 1 0 . 0 0 $ 9 , 6 2 0 . 0 0 $ 3 0 . 0 0 $ 2 8 , 8 6 0 . 0 0 87 Co n c r e t e p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r w a t e r r e l a t e d i t e m s w / f u l l d e p t h c e m e n t st a b i l i z e d b a c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 43 4 L F $ 3 5 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 1 9 0 . 0 0 $ 9 9 . 0 0 $ 4 2 , 9 6 6 . 0 0 5 48 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M D E S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L Br a z o s V a l l e y S e r v i c e s K n i f e R i v e r C o n s t r u c t i o n 88 Gr a v e l p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r w a t e r r e l a t e d i t e m s w / f u l l d e p t h c e m e n t s t a b i l i z e d ba c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 11 9 L F $ 2 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 3 8 0 . 0 0 $ 3 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 5 7 0 . 0 0 89 Cu r b & g u t t e r r e p a i r f o r w a t e r r e l a t e d c r o s s i n g s w / f u l l d e p t h c e m e n t s t a b i l i z e d sa n d b a c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 12 2 E A $ 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 8 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 7 , 0 8 0 . 0 0 90 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n t r e n c h , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 3, 7 1 1 S Y $ 3 0 . 0 0 $ 1 1 1 , 3 3 0 . 0 0 $ 6 5 . 0 0 $ 2 4 1 , 2 1 5 . 0 0 91 6" C - 9 0 9 P V C W a t e r l i n e i n s t a l l e d b y w e t b o r e i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 14 0 L F $ 4 8 . 0 0 $ 6 , 7 2 0 . 0 0 $ 7 0 . 0 0 $ 9 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 92 Re p l a c e b r i c k p a v e r s , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n pl a c e 1 L F $ 5 0 . 0 0 $ 5 0 . 0 0 $ 4 1 . 0 0 $ 4 1 . 0 0 93 Gr o u t f i l l e x i s t i n g w a t e r l i n e , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e 11 , 9 0 0 L F $ 5 . 0 0 $ 5 9 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 . 5 0 $ 4 1 , 6 5 0 . 0 0 94 Re m o v e a n d r e s e t e x i s t i n g l i g h t p o l e , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 2 E A $ 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 95 Re m o v e a n d r e s e t e x i s t i n g m a i l b o x e s , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 5 E A $ 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 1 0 . 0 0 $ 5 5 0 . 0 0 $1 , 2 2 8 , 4 3 1 . 0 0 $ 1 , 4 6 6 , 5 6 8 . 0 0 E. S A N I T A R Y S E W E R S Y S T E M I T E M S 96 8" S D R 2 6 P V C ( A S T M D 3 0 3 4 ) S a n i t a r y S e w e r L i n e , i n c l u d i n g f i t t i n g s , r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 4 3 2 L F $ 3 2 . 0 0 $ 4 5 , 8 2 4 . 0 0 $ 3 7 . 0 0 $ 5 2 , 9 8 4 . 0 0 97 8" S D R 2 6 P V C ( A S T M D 3 0 3 4 ) S a n i t a r y S e w e r L i n e i n s t a l l e d b y d r y b o r i n g , in c l u d i n g f i t t i n g s , r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 30 4 L F $ 1 8 5 . 0 0 $ 5 6 , 2 4 0 . 0 0 $ 9 6 . 0 0 $ 2 9 , 1 8 4 . 0 0 98 6" S D R 2 6 P V C ( A S T M D 3 0 3 4 ) S a n i t a r y S e w e r L i n e , i n c l u d i n g f i t t i n g s , r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 5, 3 4 8 L F $ 3 0 . 0 0 $ 1 6 0 , 4 4 0 . 0 0 $ 3 5 . 0 0 $ 1 8 7 , 1 8 0 . 0 0 99 6" S D R 2 6 P V C ( A S T M D 3 0 3 4 ) S a n i t a r y S e w e r L i n e i n s t a l l e d b y d r y b o r e , in c l u d i n g f i t t i n g s , r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 60 L F $ 1 8 5 . 0 0 $ 1 1 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 10 0 Pr e c a s t c o n c r e t e m a n h o l e s , w / c o n e , l i d , r i m , s e a l a n t , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 23 E A $ 2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 9 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 10 1 Co n s t r u c t s t a n d a r d c o n c r e t e m a n h o l e o n e x i s t i n g s e w e r l i n e w / l i d , r i m , se a l a n t , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 5 E A $ 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 10 2 Pr e c a s t c o n c r e t e d r o p m a n h o l e o n e x i s t i n g s e w e r l i n e w / l i d , r i m , s e a l a n t , in c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 2 E A $ 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 10 3 Pr e c a s t c o n c r e t e d r o p m a n h o l e s , w / l i d , r i m , s e a l a n t , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 4 E A $ 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 10 4 Fl o w a b l e F i l l ( G r o u t ) C o n c r e t e f o r e x i s t i n g s e w e r l i n e i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 2, 0 3 2 L F $ 5 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 1 6 0 . 0 0 $ 3 . 5 0 $ 7 , 1 1 2 . 0 0 TO T A L S E C T I O N D - W A T E R S Y S T E M I T E M S 6 49 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M D E S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L Br a z o s V a l l e y S e r v i c e s K n i f e R i v e r C o n s t r u c t i o n 10 5 St a n d a r d 6 " c l e a n o u t a s s e m b l y , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e 7 E A $ 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 10 6 Sh o r t s e w e r s e r v i c e t r a n s f e r , i n c l u d i n g s e r v i c e l i n e , r e l a t e d f i t t i n g s i t e m s & ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 50 E A $ 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 4 0 . 0 0 $ 2 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 10 7 Lo n g s e w e r s e r v i c e t r a n s f e r , i n c l u d i n g s e r v i c e l i n e , r e l a t e d f i t t i n g s , i t e m s & ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 38 E A $ 1 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 9 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8 4 0 . 0 0 $ 3 1 , 9 2 0 . 0 0 10 8 Co n n e c t p r o p o s e d s e w e r l i n e t o e x i s t i n g m a n h o l e w / c o r i n g & s e a l i n g o f w a l l pe n e t r a t i o n i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 6 E A $ 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 3 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 3 8 0 . 0 0 10 9 Cu r b a n d g u t t e r r e p a i r f o r s e w e r r e l a t e d c r o s s i n g s i n c l u d i n g f u l l d e p t h c e m e n t st a b i l i z e d s a n d b a c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s 76 E A $ 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 1 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 6 4 0 . 0 0 11 0 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r s e w e r r e l a t e d i t e m s w / f u l l d e p t h c e m e n t st a b i l i z e d b a c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 92 6 L F $ 3 0 . 0 0 $ 2 7 , 7 8 0 . 0 0 $ 6 3 . 0 0 $ 5 8 , 3 3 8 . 0 0 11 1 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r s e w e r m a i n & m a n h o l e c o n s t r u c t i o n w i t h i n ex i s t i n g r o a d w a y w / f u l l d e p t h c e m e n t s t a b i l i z e d b a c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 3, 7 5 0 S Y $ 9 0 . 0 0 $ 3 3 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 7 . 0 0 $ 3 6 3 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 11 2 Co n c r e t e p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r s e w e r r e l a t e d i t e m s w / f u l l d e p t h c e m e n t st a b i l i z e d s a n d b a c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n pl a c e 24 2 L F $ 5 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 5 . 0 0 $ 3 0 , 2 5 0 . 0 0 11 3 Gr a v e l p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r s e w e r r e l a t e d i t e m s w / f u l l d e p t h c e m e n t s t a b i l i z e d sa n d b a c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 99 L F $ 3 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 9 7 0 . 0 0 $ 5 1 . 0 0 $ 5 , 0 4 9 . 0 0 11 4 Di s c o n n e c t a n d c a p e x i s t i n g s e w e r l i n e s i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d f i t t i n g s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 10 E A $ 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 11 5 R e m o v e & d i s p o s e o f e x i s t i n g m a n h o l e , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1 1 E A $ 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 11 6 R e m o v e a n d d i s p o s e o f e x i s t i n g s e w e r l i n e , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 6 7 L F $ 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 4 0 . 0 0 $ 2 7 . 0 0 $ 1 , 8 0 9 . 0 0 11 7 Re m o v e & d i s p o s e o f e x i s t i n g s a n i t a r y s e w e r l i n e a s n e w s a n i t a r y s e w e r l i n e is i n s t a l l e d , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 4, 1 9 4 L F $ 1 0 . 0 0 $ 4 1 , 9 4 0 . 0 0 $ 6 . 1 0 $ 2 5 , 5 8 3 . 4 0 11 8 In s t a l l 8 " S D R 1 1 I P S H D P E b y p i p e b u r s t i n g , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 15 9 L F $ 7 5 . 0 0 $ 1 1 , 9 2 5 . 0 0 $ 1 5 0 . 0 0 $ 2 3 , 8 5 0 . 0 0 11 9 4" S D R 2 6 P V C s e w e r l i n e i n s t a l l e d b y o p e n c u t i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 55 L F $ 3 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 6 5 0 . 0 0 $ 3 3 . 5 0 $ 1 , 8 4 2 . 5 0 12 0 6" d u c t i l e i r o n s e w e r l i n e i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e in p l a c e 19 L F $ 6 4 . 0 0 $ 1 , 2 1 6 . 0 0 $ 5 8 . 0 0 $ 1 , 1 0 2 . 0 0 12 1 I t e m D e l e t e d $0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 12 2 In s t a l l 6 " S D R 1 1 H D P E b y p i p e b u r s t i n g , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 41 5 L F $ 7 1 . 0 0 $ 2 9 , 4 6 5 . 0 0 $ 1 4 0 . 0 0 $ 5 8 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 12 3 Re m o v e , d i s p o s e a n d c o n s t r u c t c o n c r e t e v a l l e y d r a i n , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s an d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 37 3 L F $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 , 9 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 5 . 0 0 $ 3 9 , 1 6 5 . 0 0 7 50 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M D E S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L Br a z o s V a l l e y S e r v i c e s K n i f e R i v e r C o n s t r u c t i o n 12 4 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e 25 S Y $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 1 6 . 0 0 $ 2 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 12 5 St r u c t u r a l b a c k f i l l f o r s e w e r r e l a t e d i t e m s w / f u l l d e p t h c e m e n t s t a b i l i z e d ba c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 50 L F $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 7 . 0 0 $ 2 , 8 5 0 . 0 0 12 6 A 16 " S t a n d a r d w e i g h t s t e e l c a s i n g i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e 30 4 L F $ 1 2 7 . 0 0 $ 3 8 , 6 0 8 . 0 0 $ 1 4 5 . 0 0 $ 4 4 , 0 8 0 . 0 0 12 7 A 14 " S t a n d a r d w e i g h t s t e e l c a s i n g i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e 80 L F $ 1 2 0 . 0 0 $ 9 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 0 . 0 0 $ 9 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 $1 , 0 1 2 , 1 7 8 . 0 0 $ 1 , 1 3 3 , 4 6 8 . 9 0 Y es Y es Y es Y es 33 $3 , 8 5 8 , 8 3 0 . 9 8 Bi d C e r t i f i c a t i o n Bi d B o n d Ad d e n d u m s A c k n o w l e d g e d BA S E B I D T O T A L TO T A L S E C T I O N E - S A N I T A R Y S E W E R S Y S T E M I T E M S $4,043,260.20 8 51 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M DE S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L 13 MC - 3 0 A s p h a l t p r i m e c o a t ( 0 . 3 G A L / S Y ) , i n c l u d i n g re l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 5, 7 0 5 S Y - $ 2 . 0 0 - $ 1 1 , 4 1 0 . 0 0 - $ 1 . 6 0 - $ 9 , 1 2 8 . 0 0 14 2" T Y P E D H M A C a s p h a l t p a v e m e n t , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 5, 7 0 5 S Y - $ 1 1 . 0 0 - $ 6 2 , 7 5 5 . 0 0 - $ 1 1 . 7 0 - $ 6 6 , 7 4 8 . 5 0 15 5" T Y P E C H M A C a s p h a l t p a v e m e n t , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 5, 7 0 5 S Y - $ 2 7 . 0 0 - $ 1 5 4 , 0 3 5 . 0 0 - $ 2 7 . 8 0 - $ 1 5 8 , 5 9 9 . 0 0 16 Re i n f o r c e d c o n c r e t e c u r b & g u t t e r , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 4, 4 2 0 L F - $ 1 0 . 8 6 - $ 4 8 , 0 0 1 . 2 0 - $ 1 3 . 6 0 - $ 6 0 , 1 1 2 . 0 0 -$ 2 7 6 , 2 0 1 . 2 0 - $ 2 9 4 , 5 8 7 . 5 0 16 6" r e i n f o r c e d c o n c r e t e p a v i n g , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 5, 7 0 5 S Y $ 3 8 . 0 0 $ 2 1 6 , 7 9 0 . 0 0 $ 4 5 . 0 0 $ 2 5 6 , 7 2 5 . 0 0 20 6" d o w e l o n c u r b i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 4, 4 2 0 L F $ 3 . 5 0 $ 1 5 , 4 7 0 . 0 0 $ 4 . 0 5 $ 1 7 , 9 0 1 . 0 0 $2 3 2 , 2 6 0 . 0 0 $ 2 7 4 , 6 2 6 . 0 0 Kn i f e R i v e r Co n s t r u c t i o n AL T E R N A T E B I D 1 - C O N C R E T E P A V I N G TO T A L S E C T I O N A - I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D A. I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D Br a z o s V a l l e y Se r v i c e s B. I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L S E C T I O N B - I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L A M O U N T F O R A L T E R N A T E B I D 1 -$ 4 3 , 9 4 1 . 2 0 - $ 1 9 , 9 6 1 . 5 0 52 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M DE S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L 28 18 " R C P s t o r m s e w e r i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 41 0 LF -$ 7 5 . 0 0 - $ 3 0 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 - $ 6 9 . 0 0 - $ 2 8 , 2 9 0 . 0 0 29 24 " R C P s t o r m s e w e r i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 28 1 L F - $ 9 0 . 0 0 - $ 2 5 , 2 9 0 . 0 0 - $ 8 4 . 0 0 - $ 2 3 , 6 0 4 . 0 0 30 30 " R C P s t o r m s e w e r i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 55 3 L F - $ 1 1 0 . 0 0 - $ 6 0 , 8 3 0 . 0 0 - $ 1 0 9 . 0 0 - $ 6 0 , 2 7 7 . 0 0 31 36 " R C P s t o r m s e w e r i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 54 L F - $ 1 2 5 . 0 0 - $ 6 , 7 5 0 . 0 0 - $ 1 3 0 . 0 0 - $ 7 , 0 2 0 . 0 0 -$ 1 2 3 , 6 2 0 . 0 0 - $ 1 1 9 , 1 9 1 . 0 0 28 A 18 " H D P E s t o r m s e w e r i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 41 0 L F $ 6 3 . 0 0 $ 2 5 , 8 3 0 . 0 0 $ 5 9 . 0 0 $ 2 4 , 1 9 0 . 0 0 29 A 24 " H D P E s t o r m s e w e r i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 28 1 L F $ 7 7 . 0 0 $ 2 1 , 6 3 7 . 0 0 $ 7 6 . 0 0 $ 2 1 , 3 5 6 . 0 0 .3 0 A 30 " H D P E s t o r m s e w e r i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 55 3 L F $ 1 1 0 . 0 0 $ 6 0 , 8 3 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 1 . 5 0 $ 5 6 , 1 2 9 . 5 0 31 A 36 " H D P E s t o r m s e w e r i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 54 L F $ 9 6 . 0 0 $ 5 , 1 8 4 . 0 0 $ 1 1 5 . 0 0 $ 6 , 2 1 0 . 0 0 $1 1 3 , 4 8 1 . 0 0 $ 1 0 7 , 8 8 5 . 5 0 Kn i f e R i v e r Co n s t r u c t i o n TO T A L A M O U N T O F A L T E R N A T E B I D 2 TO T A L S E C T I O N B - I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L S E C T I O N A - I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D A. I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D B. I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D -$ 1 0 , 1 3 9 . 0 0 - $ 1 1 , 3 0 5 . 5 0 Br a z o s V a l l e y Se r v i c e s AL T E R N A T E B I D 2 - H D P E S T O R M S E W E R 53 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M DE S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L 15 5" T Y P E C H M A C a s p h a l t p a v e m e n t , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 5, 7 0 5 S Y - $ 2 7 . 0 0 - $ 1 5 4 , 0 3 5 . 0 0 - $ 2 7 . 8 0 - $ 1 5 8 , 5 9 9 . 0 0 -$ 1 5 4 , 0 3 5 . 0 0 - $ 1 5 8 , 5 9 9 . 0 0 11 7 A 2" T Y P E C H M A C a s p h a l t p a v e m e n t , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 5, 7 0 5 S Y $ 1 1 . 0 0 $ 6 2 , 7 5 5 . 0 0 $ 1 1 . 7 0 $ 6 6 , 7 4 8 . 5 0 11 8 A 6" c r u s h e d l i m e s t o n e , T x D O T t y p e " A " , g r a d e 1 co m p a c t e d t o 9 8 % A S T M D 6 9 8 s t a n d a r d p r o c t o r de n s i t y @ o p t i m u m m o i s t u r e c o n t e n t , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d it e m s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 5, 7 0 5 S Y $ 9 . 5 0 $ 5 4 , 1 9 7 . 5 0 $ 1 2 . 3 0 $ 7 0 , 1 7 1 . 5 0 $1 1 6 , 9 5 2 . 5 0 $ 1 3 6 , 9 2 0 . 0 0 -$21,679.00 A. I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D B. I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D Kn i f e R i v e r Co n s t r u c t i o n TO T A L S E C T I O N B - I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L S E C T I O N A - I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D Br a z o s V a l l e y Se r v i c e s AL T E R N A T E B I D 3 - A S P H A L T P A V I N G TO T A L A M O U N T O F A L T E R N A T E B I D 3 -$ 3 7 , 0 8 2 . 5 0 54 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M DE S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L 88 Gr a v e l p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r w a t e r r e l a t e d i t e m s w / f u l l de p t h c e m e n t s t a b i l i z e d b a c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 85 L F - $ 2 0 . 0 0 - $ 1 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 - $ 3 0 . 0 0 - $ 2 , 5 5 0 . 0 0 85 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r w a t e r r e l a t e d i t e m s w / f u l l de p t h c e m e n t s t a b i l i z e d b a c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 11 4 L F - $ 2 0 . 0 0 - $ 2 , 2 8 0 . 0 0 - $ 4 0 . 0 0 - $ 4 , 5 6 0 . 0 0 51 6" C - 9 0 0 P V C W a t e r l i n e i n c l u d e d r e l a t e d f i t t i n g s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 47 9 L F - $ 3 4 . 0 0 - $ 1 6 , 2 8 6 . 0 0 - $ 3 7 . 8 0 - $ 1 8 , 1 0 6 . 2 0 91 6" C - 9 0 0 P V C w a t e r l i n e i n s t a l l e d b y u n c a s e d b o r e , in c l u d i n g f i t t i n g s , r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e 14 0 L F - $ 4 8 . 0 0 - $ 6 , 7 2 0 . 0 0 - $ 7 0 . 0 0 - $ 9 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 -$ 2 6 , 9 8 6 . 0 0 - $ 3 5 , 0 1 6 . 2 0 60 6" C - 9 0 0 C e r t a - L o k P V C w a t e r l i n e i n s t a l l e d b y di r e c t i o n a l b o r i n g , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 47 9 L F $ 5 1 . 0 0 $ 2 4 , 4 2 9 . 0 0 $ 6 5 . 0 0 $ 3 1 , 1 3 5 . 0 0 12 0 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r b o r i n g p i t s i n c l u d i n g re l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 33 S Y $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 6 2 0 . 0 0 $2 5 , 7 4 9 . 0 0 $ 3 5 , 7 5 5 . 0 0 $738.80 AL T E R N A T E B I D 4 - A N G U S S T R E E T D I R E C T I O N A L B O R I N G Kn i f e R i v e r Co n s t r u c t i o n A. I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D B. I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L S E C T I O N A - I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D Br a z o s V a l l e y Se r v i c e s TO T A L S E C T I O N B - I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L A M O U N T O F A L T E R N A T E B I D 4 -$ 1 , 2 3 7 . 0 0 55 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M DE S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L 51 6" C - 9 0 0 P V C W a t e r l i n e i n c l u d e d r e l a t e d f i t t i n g s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 99 6 L F - $ 3 4 . 0 0 - $ 3 3 , 8 6 4 . 0 0 - $ 3 7 . 8 0 - $ 3 7 , 6 4 8 . 8 0 90 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n t r e n c h , in c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n pl a c e 45 6 S Y - $ 4 0 . 0 0 - $ 1 8 , 2 4 0 . 0 0 - $ 6 5 . 0 0 - $ 2 9 , 6 4 0 . 0 0 -$ 5 2 , 1 0 4 . 0 0 - $ 6 7 , 2 8 8 . 8 0 60 6" C - 9 0 0 C e r t a - L o k P V C w a t e r l i n e i n s t a l l e d b y di r e c t i o n a l b o r i n g , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 99 6 L F $ 5 1 . 0 0 $ 5 0 , 7 9 6 . 0 0 $ 5 9 . 0 0 $ 5 8 , 7 6 4 . 0 0 12 1 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r s h o r t s e r v i c e s , c o m p l e t e i n pl a c e 36 L F $ 2 0 . 0 0 $ 7 2 0 . 0 0 $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 4 4 0 . 0 0 12 0 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r b o r i n g p i t s i n c l u d i n g re l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 11 7 S Y $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 6 , 3 8 0 . 0 0 $5 6 , 1 9 6 . 0 0 $ 7 6 , 5 8 4 . 0 0 $9,295.20 AL T E R N A T E B I D 5 - A Y R S H I R E A V E N U E D I R E C T I O N A L B O R I N G Kn i f e R i v e r Co n s t r u c t i o n A. I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D B. I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L S E C T I O N A - I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D Br a z o s V a l l e y Se r v i c e s TO T A L S E C T I O N B - I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L A M O U N T O F A L T E R N A T E B I D 5 $4 , 0 9 2 . 0 0 56 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M DE S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L 51 6" C - 9 0 0 P V C W a t e r l i n e i n c l u d e d r e l a t e d f i t t i n g s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 84 2 L F - $ 3 4 . 0 0 - $ 2 8 , 6 2 8 . 0 0 - $ 3 7 . 8 0 - $ 3 1 , 8 2 7 . 6 0 90 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n t r e n c h , in c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n pl a c e 60 8 L F - $ 3 0 . 0 0 - $ 1 8 , 2 4 0 . 0 0 - $ 4 0 . 0 0 - $ 2 4 , 3 2 0 . 0 0 -$ 4 6 , 8 6 8 . 0 0 - $ 5 6 , 1 4 7 . 6 0 12 1 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r s h o r t s e r v i c e s , c o m p l e t e i n pl a c e 26 L F $ 2 0 . 0 0 $ 5 2 0 . 0 0 $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 0 4 0 . 0 0 60 6" C - 9 0 0 C e r t a - L o k P V C w a t e r l i n e i n s t a l l e d b y di r e c t i o n a l b o r i n g , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 84 2 L F $ 5 1 . 0 0 $ 4 2 , 9 4 2 . 0 0 $ 6 7 . 0 0 $ 5 6 , 4 1 4 . 0 0 12 0 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r b o r i n g p i t s i n c l u d i n g re l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 62 S Y $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 4 8 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 0 . 0 0 $ 8 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 $4 5 , 9 4 2 . 0 0 $ 6 6 , 1 3 4 . 0 0 TO T A L A M O U N T O F A L T E R N A T E B I D 6 -$ 9 2 6 . 0 0 $ 9 , 9 8 6 . 4 0 Kn i f e R i v e r Co n s t r u c t i o n A. I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D AL T E R N A T E B I D 6 - K E R R Y S T R E E T D I R E C T I O N A L B O R I N G Br a z o s V a l l e y Se r v i c e s B. I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L S E C T I O N A - I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D TO T A L S E C T I O N B - I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D 57 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M DE S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L 51 6" C - 9 0 0 P V C W a t e r l i n e i n c l u d e d r e l a t e d f i t t i n g s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 62 0 L F - $ 3 4 . 0 0 - $ 2 1 , 0 8 0 . 0 0 - $ 3 7 . 8 0 - $ 2 3 , 4 3 6 . 0 0 88 Gr a v e l p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r w a t e r r e l a t e d i t e m s w / f u l l de p t h c e m e n t s t a b i l i z e d b a c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 12 L F - $ 2 0 . 0 0 - $ 2 4 0 . 0 0 - $ 3 0 . 0 0 - $ 3 6 0 . 0 0 87 Co n c r e t e p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r w a t e r r e l a t e d i t e m s w / fu l l d e p t h c e m e n t s t a b i l i z e d b a c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 22 L F - $ 3 5 . 0 0 - $ 7 7 0 . 0 0 - $ 9 9 . 0 0 - $ 2 , 1 7 8 . 0 0 90 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n t r e n c h , in c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n pl a c e 17 1 S Y - $ 3 0 . 0 0 - $ 5 , 1 3 0 . 0 0 - $ 6 5 . 0 0 - $ 1 1 , 1 1 5 . 0 0 85 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r w a t e r r e l a t e d i t e m s w / f u l l de p t h c e m e n t s t a b i l i z e d b a c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 49 L F - $ 2 0 . 0 0 - $ 9 8 0 . 0 0 - $ 4 0 . 0 0 - $ 1 , 9 6 0 . 0 0 -$ 2 8 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 - $ 3 9 , 0 4 9 . 0 0 60 6" C - 9 0 0 C e r t a - L o k P V C w a t e r l i n e i n s t a l l e d b y di r e c t i o n a l b o r i n g , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 69 1 L F $ 5 1 . 0 0 $ 3 5 , 2 4 1 . 0 0 $ 6 5 . 0 0 $ 4 4 , 9 1 5 . 0 0 12 0 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r b o r i n g p i t s i n c l u d i n g re l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 45 S Y $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $3 7 , 0 4 1 . 0 0 $ 5 1 , 2 1 5 . 0 0 TO T A L A M O U N T O F A L T E R N A T E B I D 7 $8 , 8 4 1 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 1 6 6 . 0 0 Kn i f e R i v e r Co n s t r u c t i o n AL T E R N A T E B I D 7 - W E S T D E X T E R D I R E C T I O N A L B O R I N G A. I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D Br a z o s V a l l e y Se r v i c e s B. I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L S E C T I O N A - I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D TO T A L S E C T I O N B - I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D 58 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M DE S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L 51 6" C - 9 0 0 P V C W a t e r l i n e i n c l u d e d r e l a t e d f i t t i n g s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 2 4 3 L F - $ 3 4 . 0 0 - $ 4 2 , 2 6 2 . 0 0 - $ 3 7 . 8 0 - $ 4 6 , 9 8 5 . 4 0 90 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n t r e n c h , in c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n pl a c e 1, 2 3 6 S Y - $ 3 0 . 0 0 - $ 3 7 , 0 8 0 . 0 0 - $ 6 5 . 0 0 - $ 8 0 , 3 4 0 . 0 0 49 12 " C - 9 0 0 P V C W a t e r l i n e i n c l u d e d r e l a t e d f i t t i n g s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 3 0 8 L F - $ 4 5 . 0 0 - $ 5 8 , 8 6 0 . 0 0 - $ 5 7 . 0 0 - $ 7 4 , 5 5 6 . 0 0 -$ 1 3 8 , 2 0 2 . 0 0 - $ 2 0 1 , 8 8 1 . 4 0 60 6" C - 9 0 0 C e r t a - L o k P V C w a t e r l i n e i n s t a l l e d b y di r e c t i o n a l b o r i n g , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 2 4 3 L F $ 5 1 . 0 0 $ 6 3 , 3 9 3 . 0 0 $ 6 1 . 0 0 $ 7 5 , 8 2 3 . 0 0 58 12 " C - 9 0 0 C e r t a - L o k P V C w a t e r l i n e i n s t a l l e d b y di r e c t i o n a l b o r i n g , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 3 0 8 L F $ 9 0 . 0 0 $ 1 1 7 , 7 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 3 . 0 0 $ 1 3 4 , 7 2 4 . 0 0 12 1 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r s h o r t s e r v i c e s , c o m p l e t e i n pl a c e 10 0 L F $ 2 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 12 0 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r b o r i n g p i t s i n c l u d i n g re l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 17 7 S Y $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 7 , 0 8 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 0 . 0 0 $ 2 4 , 7 8 0 . 0 0 $1 9 0 , 1 9 3 . 0 0 $ 2 3 9 , 3 2 7 . 0 0 Kn i f e R i v e r Co n s t r u c t i o n TO T A L S E C T I O N A - I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D A. I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D AL T E R N A T E B I D 8 - F A I R V I E W A V E N U E D I R E C T I O N A L B O R I N G Br a z o s V a l l e y Se r v i c e s B. I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L S E C T I O N B - I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L A M O U N T O F A L T E R N A T E B I D 8 $5 1 , 9 9 1 . 0 0 $ 3 7 , 4 4 5 . 6 0 59 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M DE S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L 51 6" C - 9 0 0 P V C W a t e r l i n e i n c l u d e d r e l a t e d f i t t i n g s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 35 7 L F - $ 3 4 . 0 0 - $ 1 2 , 1 3 8 . 0 0 - $ 3 7 . 8 0 - $ 1 3 , 4 9 4 . 6 0 90 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n t r e n c h , in c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n pl a c e 24 0 S Y - $ 3 0 . 0 0 - $ 7 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 - $ 6 5 . 0 0 - $ 1 5 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 -$ 1 9 , 3 3 8 . 0 0 - $ 2 9 , 0 9 4 . 6 0 12 1 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r s h o r t s e r v i c e s , c o m p l e t e i n pl a c e 3 L F $ 2 0 . 0 0 $ 6 0 . 0 0 $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 0 . 0 0 60 6" C - 9 0 0 C e r t a - L o k P V C w a t e r l i n e i n s t a l l e d b y di r e c t i o n a l b o r i n g , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 35 7 L F $ 5 1 . 0 0 $ 1 8 , 2 0 7 . 0 0 $ 6 9 . 0 0 $ 2 4 , 6 3 3 . 0 0 12 0 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r b o r i n g p i t s i n c l u d i n g re l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 33 S Y $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 3 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 0 . 0 0 $ 4 , 6 2 0 . 0 0 $1 9 , 5 8 7 . 0 0 $ 2 9 , 3 7 3 . 0 0 $2 4 9 . 0 0 $ 2 7 8 . 4 0 Kn i f e R i v e r Co n s t r u c t i o n AL T E R N A T E B I D 9 - H E R E F O R D S T R E E T D I R E C T I O N A L B O R I N G A. I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D B. I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L S E C T I O N A - I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D Br a z o s V a l l e y Se r v i c e s TO T A L S E C T I O N B - I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L A M O U N T O F A L T E R N A T E B I D 9 60 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M DE S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L 49 12 " C - 9 0 0 P V C W a t e r l i n e i n c l u d e d r e l a t e d f i t t i n g s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 2 3 8 L F - $ 4 5 . 0 0 - $ 5 5 , 7 1 0 . 0 0 - $ 5 7 . 0 0 - $ 7 0 , 5 6 6 . 0 0 86 St r u c t u r a l b a c k f i l l f o r w a t e r r e l a t e d i t e m s w / f u l l d e p t h ce m e n t s t a b i l i z e d b a c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 22 4 L F - $ 1 0 . 0 0 - $ 2 , 2 4 0 . 0 0 - $ 3 0 . 0 0 - $ 6 , 7 2 0 . 0 0 85 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r w a t e r r e l a t e d i t e m s w / f u l l de p t h c e m e n t s t a b i l i z e d b a c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 38 L F - $ 2 0 . 0 0 - $ 7 6 0 . 0 0 - $ 4 0 . 0 0 - $ 1 , 5 2 0 . 0 0 88 Gr a v e l p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r w a t e r r e l a t e d i t e m s w / f u l l de p t h c e m e n t s t a b i l i z e d b a c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 15 L F - $ 2 0 . 0 0 - $ 3 0 0 . 0 0 - $ 3 0 . 0 0 - $ 4 5 0 . 0 0 -$ 5 9 , 0 1 0 . 0 0 - $ 7 9 , 2 5 6 . 0 0 58 12 " C - 9 0 0 C e r t a - L o k P V C w a t e r l i n e i n s t a l l e d b y di r e c t i o n a l b o r i n g , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 2 3 8 L F $ 9 0 . 0 0 $ 1 1 1 , 4 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 8 . 0 0 $ 1 3 3 , 7 0 4 . 0 0 12 0 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r b o r i n g p i t s i n c l u d i n g re l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 22 S Y $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 8 8 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 0 8 0 . 0 0 $1 1 2 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 3 6 , 7 8 4 . 0 0 $57,528.00 Kn i f e R i v e r Co n s t r u c t i o n AL T E R N A T E B I D 1 0 - W E L S H S T R E E T D I R E C T I O N A L B O R I N G A. I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D B. I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L S E C T I O N A - I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D Br a z o s V a l l e y Se r v i c e s TO T A L S E C T I O N B - I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L A M O U N T O F A L T E R N A T E B I D 1 0 $5 3 , 2 9 0 . 0 0 61 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M DE S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L 51 6" C - 9 0 0 P V C W a t e r l i n e i n c l u d e d r e l a t e d f i t t i n g s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 2 2 3 L F - $ 3 4 . 0 0 - $ 4 1 , 5 8 2 . 0 0 - $ 3 7 . 8 0 - $ 4 6 , 2 2 9 . 4 0 86 St r u c t u r a l b a c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 11 7 L F - $ 1 0 . 0 0 - $ 1 , 1 7 0 . 0 0 - $ 3 0 . 0 0 - $ 3 , 5 1 0 . 0 0 90 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n t r e n c h , in c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n pl a c e 52 1 S Y - $ 3 0 . 0 0 - $ 1 5 , 6 3 0 . 0 0 - $ 6 5 . 0 0 - $ 3 3 , 8 6 5 . 0 0 87 Co n c r e t e p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r w a t e r r e l a t e d i t e m s w / fu l l d e p t h c e m e n t s t a b i l i z e d b a c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 10 L F - $ 3 5 . 0 0 - $ 3 5 0 . 0 0 - $ 9 9 . 0 0 - $ 9 9 0 . 0 0 85 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r w a t e r r e l a t e d i t e m s w / f u l l de p t h c e m e n t s t a b i l i z e d b a c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 48 L F - $ 2 0 . 0 0 - $ 9 6 0 . 0 0 - $ 4 0 . 0 0 - $ 1 , 9 2 0 . 0 0 -$ 5 9 , 6 9 2 . 0 0 - $ 8 6 , 5 1 4 . 4 0 87 Co n c r e t e p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r w a t e r r e l a t e d i t e m s w / fu l l d e p t h c e m e n t s t a b i l i z e d b a c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 11 L F $ 3 5 . 0 0 $ 3 8 5 . 0 0 $ 9 9 . 0 0 $ 1 , 0 8 9 . 0 0 60 6" C - 9 0 0 C e r t a - L o k P V C w a t e r l i n e i n s t a l l e d b y di r e c t i o n a l b o r i n g , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 2 2 3 L F $ 5 1 . 0 0 $ 6 2 , 3 7 3 . 0 0 $ 6 1 . 0 0 $ 7 4 , 6 0 3 . 0 0 12 0 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r b o r i n g p i t s i n c l u d i n g re l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 88 S Y $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 3 , 5 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 3 2 0 . 0 0 $6 6 , 2 7 8 . 0 0 $ 8 8 , 0 1 2 . 0 0 $1,497.60 TO T A L S E C T I O N A - I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D Knife River Co n s t r u c t i o n AL T E R N A T E B I D 1 1 - T H O M P S O N S T R E E T D I R E C T I O N A L B O R I N G A. I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D B. I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D Br a z o s V a l l e y Se r v i c e s TO T A L S E C T I O N B - I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L A M O U N T O F A L T E R N A T E B I D 1 1 $6 , 5 8 6 . 0 0 62 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M DE S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L 51 6" C - 9 0 0 P V C W a t e r l i n e i n c l u d e d r e l a t e d f i t t i n g s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 57 5 L F - $ 3 4 . 0 0 - $ 1 9 , 5 5 0 . 0 0 - $ 3 7 . 8 0 - $ 2 1 , 7 3 5 . 0 0 90 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n t r e n c h , in c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n pl a c e 27 6 S Y - $ 3 0 . 0 0 - $ 8 , 2 8 0 . 0 0 - $ 6 5 . 0 0 - $ 1 7 , 9 4 0 . 0 0 -$ 2 7 , 8 3 0 . 0 0 - $ 3 9 , 6 7 5 . 0 0 60 6" C - 9 0 0 C e r t a - L o k P V C w a t e r l i n e i n s t a l l e d b y di r e c t i o n a l b o r i n g , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 57 5 L F $ 5 1 . 0 0 $ 2 9 , 3 2 5 . 0 0 $ 7 5 . 0 0 $ 4 3 , 1 2 5 . 0 0 12 0 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r b o r i n g p i t s i n c l u d i n g re l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 44 S Y $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 7 6 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 1 6 0 . 0 0 $3 1 , 0 8 5 . 0 0 $ 4 9 , 2 8 5 . 0 0 $9,610.00 Kn i f e R i v e r Co n s t r u c t i o n AL T E R N A T E B I D 1 2 - E D W A R D S T R E E T D I R E C T I O N A L B O R I N G A. I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D B. I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L S E C T I O N A - I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D Br a z o s V a l l e y Se r v i c e s TO T A L S E C T I O N B - I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L A M O U N T O F A L T E R N A T E B I D 1 2 $3 , 2 5 5 . 0 0 63 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M DE S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L 50 8" C - 9 0 0 P V C W a t e r l i n e i n c l u d e d r e l a t e d f i t t i n g s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 0 8 5 L F - $ 3 7 . 0 0 - $ 4 0 , 1 4 5 . 0 0 - $ 4 6 . 0 0 - $ 4 9 , 9 1 0 . 0 0 85 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r w a t e r r e l a t e d i t e m s w / f u l l de p t h c e m e n t s t a b i l i z e d b a c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 12 0 L F - $ 2 0 . 0 0 - $ 2 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 - $ 4 0 . 0 0 - $ 4 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 87 Co n c r e t e p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r w a t e r r e l a t e d i t e m s w / fu l l d e p t h c e m e n t s t a b i l i z e d b a c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 14 9 L F - $ 3 5 . 0 0 - $ 5 , 2 1 5 . 0 0 - $ 9 9 . 0 0 - $ 1 4 , 7 5 1 . 0 0 88 Gr a v e l p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r w a t e r r e l a t e d i t e m s w / f u l l de p t h c e m e n t s t a b i l i z e d b a c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 7 L F - $ 2 0 . 0 0 - $ 1 4 0 . 0 0 - $ 3 0 . 0 0 - $ 2 1 0 . 0 0 -$ 4 7 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 - $ 6 9 , 6 7 1 . 0 0 87 Co n c r e t e p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r w a t e r r e l a t e d i t e m s w / fu l l d e p t h c e m e n t s t a b i l i z e d b a c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 9 L F $ 3 5 . 0 0 $ 3 1 5 . 0 0 $ 9 9 . 0 0 $ 8 9 1 . 0 0 59 8" C - 9 0 0 C e r t a - L o k P V C w a t e r l i n e i n s t a l l e d b y di r e c t i o n a l b o r i n g , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 0 8 5 L F $ 6 0 . 0 0 $ 6 5 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8 3 . 0 0 $ 9 0 , 0 5 5 . 0 0 12 0 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r b o r i n g p i t s i n c l u d i n g re l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 11 S Y $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 4 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 4 0 . 0 0 $6 5 , 8 5 5 . 0 0 $ 9 2 , 4 8 6 . 0 0 $22,815.00 Kn i f e R i v e r Co n s t r u c t i o n AL T E R N A T E B I D 1 3 - E L E A N O R S T R E E T D I R E C T I O N A L B O R I N G A. I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D B. I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L S E C T I O N A - I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D Br a z o s V a l l e y Se r v i c e s TO T A L A M O U N T O F A L T E R N A T E B I D 1 3 TO T A L S E C T I O N B - I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D $1 7 , 9 5 5 . 0 0 64 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M DE S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L 52 4" C - 9 0 0 P V C W a t e r l i n e i n c l u d e d r e l a t e d f i t t i n g s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 51 3 L F - $ 3 2 . 0 0 - $ 1 6 , 4 1 6 . 0 0 - $ 3 7 . 0 0 - $ 1 8 , 9 8 1 . 0 0 85 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r w a t e r r e l a t e d i t e m s w / f u l l de p t h c e m e n t s t a b i l i z e d b a c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 59 L F - $ 2 0 . 0 0 - $ 1 , 1 8 0 . 0 0 - $ 4 0 . 0 0 - $ 2 , 3 6 0 . 0 0 87 Co n c r e t e p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r w a t e r r e l a t e d i t e m s w / fu l l d e p t h c e m e n t s t a b i l i z e d b a c k f i l l i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 81 L F - $ 3 5 . 0 0 - $ 2 , 8 3 5 . 0 0 - $ 9 9 . 0 0 - $ 8 , 0 1 9 . 0 0 -$ 2 0 , 4 3 1 . 0 0 - $ 2 9 , 3 6 0 . 0 0 61 4" Y e l l o w m i n e S D R 1 7 w a t e r l i n e i n s t a l l e d b y d i r e c t i o n a l bo r i n g i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , co m p l e t e i n p l a c e 51 3 L F $ 3 5 . 0 0 $ 1 7 , 9 5 5 . 0 0 $ 6 8 . 0 0 $ 3 4 , 8 8 4 . 0 0 12 0 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r b o r i n g p i t s i n c l u d i n g re l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 11 S Y $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 4 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 5 4 0 . 0 0 $1 8 , 3 9 5 . 0 0 $ 3 6 , 4 2 4 . 0 0 $7,064.00Knife River Construction AL T E R N A T E B I D 1 4 - M O N T C L A I R S T R E E T D I R E C T I O N A L B O R I N G A. I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D B. I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L S E C T I O N A - I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D Br a z o s V a l l e y S e r v i c e s TO T A L S E C T I O N B - I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L A M O U N T O F A L T E R N A T E B I D 1 4 -$ 2 , 0 3 6 . 0 0 65 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M DE S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L 90 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n t r e n c h , in c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s a n d a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n pl a c e 73 S Y - $ 3 0 . 0 0 - $ 2 , 1 9 0 . 0 0 - $ 6 5 . 0 0 - $ 4 , 7 4 5 . 0 0 51 6" C - 9 0 0 P V C W a t e r l i n e i n c l u d e d r e l a t e d f i t t i n g s a n d ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 16 2 L F - $ 3 4 . 0 0 - $ 5 , 5 0 8 . 0 0 - $ 3 7 . 8 0 - $ 6 , 1 2 3 . 6 0 -$ 7 , 6 9 8 . 0 0 - $ 1 0 , 8 6 8 . 6 0 60 6" C - 9 0 0 C e r t a - L o k P V C w a t e r l i n e i n s t a l l e d b y di r e c t i o n a l b o r i n g , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 16 2 L F $ 5 1 . 0 0 $ 8 , 2 6 2 . 0 0 $ 1 0 4 . 0 0 $ 1 6 , 8 4 8 . 0 0 12 0 As p h a l t p a v e m e n t r e p a i r f o r b o r i n g p i t s i n c l u d i n g re l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 44 S Y $ 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 7 6 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 1 6 0 . 0 0 $1 0 , 0 2 2 . 0 0 $ 2 3 , 0 0 8 . 0 0 $12,139.40 Kn i f e R i v e r Co n s t r u c t i o n AL T E R N A T E B I D 1 5 - B E L L S T R E E T D I R E C T I O N A L B O R I N G A. I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D B. I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L S E C T I O N A - I T E M S T O B E D E L E T E D F R O M B A S E B I D Br a z o s V a l l e y Se r v i c e s TO T A L S E C T I O N B - I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L A M O U N T O F A L T E R N A T E B I D 1 5 $2 , 3 2 4 . 0 0 66 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M DE S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L 12 2 A Mi l l & D i s p o s e o f 2 " o f e x i s t i n g a s p h a l t c o n c r e t e (T x D O T S p e c i f i c a t i o n I t e m 3 5 4 ) i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 2, 0 0 6 S Y $ 2 . 5 0 $ 5 , 0 1 5 . 0 0 $ 3 . 3 5 $ 6 , 7 2 0 . 1 0 12 3 A RC - 1 5 A s p h a l t t a c k c o a t ( 0 . 1 5 g a l / s y ) i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 2, 0 0 6 S Y $ 2 . 0 0 $ 4 , 0 1 2 . 0 0 $ 0 . 6 0 $ 1 , 2 0 3 . 6 0 12 4 A 2" T y p e D H M A C A s p h a l t p a v e m e n t , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 2, 0 0 6 S Y $ 1 1 . 0 0 $ 2 2 , 0 6 6 . 0 0 $ 1 1 . 3 5 $ 2 2 , 7 6 8 . 1 0 $3 1 , 0 9 3 . 0 0 $ 3 0 , 6 9 1 . 8 0 $30,691.80 Kn i f e R i v e r Co n s t r u c t i o n AD D I T I V E B I D 1 - M I L L & O V E R L A Y K E R R Y S T R E E T A. I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L S E C T I O N A - I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D Br a z o s V a l l e y Se r v i c e s TO T A L A M O U N T O F A D D I T I V E B I D 1 $3 1 , 0 9 3 . 0 0 67 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M DE S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L 12 2 A Mi l l & D i s p o s e o f 2 " o f e x i s t i n g a s p h a l t c o n c r e t e (T x D O T S p e c i f i c a t i o n I t e m 3 5 4 ) i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 5 4 2 S Y $ 2 . 5 0 $ 3 , 8 5 5 . 0 0 $ 3 . 7 0 $ 5 , 7 0 5 . 4 0 12 3 A RC - 1 5 A s p h a l t t a c k c o a t ( 0 . 1 5 g a l / s y ) i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 5 4 2 S Y $ 2 . 0 0 $ 3 , 0 8 4 . 0 0 $ 0 . 6 0 $ 9 2 5 . 2 0 12 4 A 2" T y p e D H M A C A s p h a l t p a v e m e n t , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 5 4 2 S Y $ 1 1 . 0 0 $ 1 6 , 9 6 2 . 0 0 $ 1 1 . 5 0 $ 1 7 , 7 3 3 . 0 0 $2 3 , 9 0 1 . 0 0 $ 2 4 , 3 6 3 . 6 0 $24,363.60 Kn i f e R i v e r Co n s t r u c t i o n AD D I T I V E B I D 2 - M I L L & O V E R L A Y A Y R S H I R E S T R E E T TO T A L S E C T I O N A - I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D A. I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D Br a z o s V a l l e y Se r v i c e s TO T A L A M O U N T O F A D D I T I V E B I D 2 $2 3 , 9 0 1 . 0 0 68 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M DE S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L 12 2 A Mi l l & D i s p o s e o f 2 " o f e x i s t i n g a s p h a l t c o n c r e t e (T x D O T S p e c i f i c a t i o n I t e m 3 5 4 ) i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 6 3 9 S Y $ 2 . 5 0 $ 4 , 0 9 7 . 5 0 $ 3 . 5 0 $ 5 , 7 3 6 . 5 0 12 3 A RC - 1 5 A s p h a l t t a c k c o a t ( 0 . 1 5 g a l / s y ) i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 6 3 9 S Y $ 2 . 0 0 $ 3 , 2 7 8 . 0 0 $ 0 . 6 0 $ 9 8 3 . 4 0 12 4 A 2" T y p e D H M A C A s p h a l t p a v e m e n t , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 6 3 9 S Y $ 1 1 . 0 0 $ 1 8 , 0 2 9 . 0 0 $ 1 1 . 4 0 $ 1 8 , 6 8 4 . 6 0 $2 5 , 4 0 4 . 5 0 $ 2 5 , 4 0 4 . 5 0 Kn i f e R i v e r Co n s t r u c t i o n TO T A L A M O U N T O F A D D I T I V E B I D 3 TO T A L S E C T I O N A - I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D $2 5 , 4 0 4 . 5 0 $ 2 5 , 4 0 4 . 5 0 A. I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D AD D I T I V E B I D 3 - M I L L & O V E R L A Y H E R E F O R D S T R E E T Br a z o s V a l l e y Se r v i c e s 69 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M DE S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L 12 2 A Mi l l & D i s p o s e o f 2 " o f e x i s t i n g a s p h a l t c o n c r e t e (T x D O T S p e c i f i c a t i o n I t e m 3 5 4 ) i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 5 4 4 S Y $ 2 . 5 0 $ 3 , 8 6 0 . 0 0 $ 3 . 7 0 $ 5 , 7 1 2 . 8 0 12 3 A RC - 1 5 A s p h a l t t a c k c o a t ( 0 . 1 5 g a l / s y ) i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 5 4 4 S Y $ 2 . 0 0 $ 3 , 0 8 8 . 0 0 $ 0 . 6 0 $ 9 2 6 . 4 0 12 4 A 2" T y p e D H M A C A s p h a l t p a v e m e n t , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 5 4 4 S Y $ 1 1 . 0 0 $ 1 6 , 9 8 4 . 0 0 $ 1 1 . 6 0 $ 1 7 , 9 1 0 . 4 0 $2 3 , 9 3 2 . 0 0 $ 2 4 , 5 4 9 . 6 0 Kn i f e R i v e r Co n s t r u c t i o n AD D I T I V E B I D 4 - M I L L & O V E R L A Y T H O M P S O N S T R E E T A. I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L A M O U N T O F A D D I T I V E B I D 4 TO T A L S E C T I O N A - I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D $2 3 , 9 3 2 . 0 0 $ 2 4 , 5 4 9 . 6 0 Br a z o s V a l l e y Se r v i c e s 70 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M DE S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L 12 2 A Mi l l & D i s p o s e o f 2 " o f e x i s t i n g a s p h a l t c o n c r e t e (T x D O T S p e c i f i c a t i o n I t e m 3 5 4 ) i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 4 9 5 S Y $ 2 . 5 0 $ 3 , 7 3 7 . 5 0 $ 3 . 8 0 $ 5 , 6 8 1 . 0 0 12 3 A RC - 1 5 A s p h a l t t a c k c o a t ( 0 . 1 5 g a l / s y ) i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 4 9 5 S Y $ 2 . 0 0 $ 2 , 9 9 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 6 0 $ 8 9 7 . 0 0 12 4 A 2" T y p e D H M A C A s p h a l t p a v e m e n t , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 4 9 5 S Y $ 1 1 . 0 0 $ 1 6 , 4 4 5 . 0 0 $ 1 1 . 6 0 $ 1 7 , 3 4 2 . 0 0 $2 3 , 1 7 2 . 5 0 $ 2 3 , 9 2 0 . 0 0 Kn i f e R i v e r Co n s t r u c t i o n TO T A L A M O U N T O F A D D I T I V E B I D 5 $2 3 , 1 7 2 . 5 0 $ 2 3 , 9 2 0 . 0 0 A. I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L S E C T I O N A - I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D Br a z o s V a l l e y Se r v i c e s AD D I T I V E B I D 5 - M I L L & O V E R L A Y E D W A R D S T R E E T 71 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M DE S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L 12 2 A Mi l l & D i s p o s e o f 2 " o f e x i s t i n g a s p h a l t c o n c r e t e (T x D O T S p e c i f i c a t i o n I t e m 3 5 4 ) i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 2, 5 7 7 S Y $ 2 . 5 0 $ 6 , 4 4 2 . 5 0 $ 3 . 0 0 $ 7 , 7 3 1 . 0 0 12 3 A RC - 1 5 A s p h a l t t a c k c o a t ( 0 . 1 5 g a l / s y ) i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 2, 5 7 7 S Y $ 2 . 0 0 $ 5 , 1 5 4 . 0 0 $ 0 . 6 0 $ 1 , 5 4 6 . 2 0 12 4 A 2" T y p e D H M A C A s p h a l t p a v e m e n t , i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d it e m s & a p p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 2, 5 7 7 S Y $ 1 1 . 0 0 $ 2 8 , 3 4 7 . 0 0 $ 1 1 . 4 0 $ 2 9 , 3 7 7 . 8 0 $3 9 , 9 4 3 . 5 0 $ 3 8 , 6 5 5 . 0 0 Kn i f e R i v e r Co n s t r u c t i o n TO T A L S E C T I O N A - I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L A M O U N T O F A D D I T I V E B I D 6 A. I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D $3 9 , 9 4 3 . 5 0 $ 3 8 , 6 5 5 . 0 0 Br a z o s V a l l e y Se r v i c e s AD D I T I V E B I D 6 - M I L L & O V E R L A Y E L E A N O R S T R E E T 72 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M DE S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L 12 5 A Se a l C o a t s u r f a c e t r e a t m e n t i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 2, 0 0 6 S Y $ 4 . 0 0 $ 8 , 0 2 4 . 0 0 $ 5 . 4 5 $ 1 0 , 9 3 2 . 7 0 $8 , 0 2 4 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 9 3 2 . 7 0 Kn i f e R i v e r Co n s t r u c t i o n A. I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D AD D I T I V E B I D 7 - S U R F A C E T R E A T M E N T - K E R R Y S T R E E T $8 , 0 2 4 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 9 3 2 . 7 0 TO T A L S E C T I O N A - I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L A M O U N T O F A D D I T I V E B I D 7 Br a z o s V a l l e y Se r v i c e s 73 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M DE S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L 12 5 A Se a l C o a t s u r f a c e t r e a t m e n t i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 5 4 2 S Y $ 4 . 0 0 $ 6 , 1 6 8 . 0 0 $ 5 . 7 0 $ 8 , 7 8 9 . 4 0 $6 , 1 6 8 . 0 0 $ 8 , 7 8 9 . 4 0 $8,789.40 Kn i f e R i v e r Co n s t r u c t i o n A. I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D AD D I T I V E B I D 8 - S U R F A C E T R E A T M E N T - A Y R S H I R E S T R E E T TO T A L S E C T I O N A - I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D Br a z o s V a l l e y Se r v i c e s TO T A L A M O U N T O F A D D I T I V E B I D 8 $6 , 1 6 8 . 0 0 74 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M DE S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L 12 5 A Se a l C o a t s u r f a c e t r e a t m e n t i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 6 3 9 S Y $ 4 . 0 0 $ 6 , 5 5 6 . 0 0 $ 5 . 5 0 $ 9 , 0 1 4 . 5 0 $6 , 5 5 6 . 0 0 $ 9 , 0 1 4 . 5 0 Kn i f e R i v e r Co n s t r u c t i o n A. I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L A M O U N T O F A D D I T I V E B I D 9 TO T A L S E C T I O N A - I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D $6 , 5 5 6 . 0 0 $ 9 , 0 1 4 . 5 0 Br a z o s V a l l e y Se r v i c e s AD D I T I V E B I D 9 - S U R F A C E T R E A T M E N T - H E R E F O R D S T R E E T 75 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M DE S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L 12 5 A Se a l C o a t s u r f a c e t r e a t m e n t i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 5 4 4 S Y $ 4 . 0 0 $ 6 , 1 7 6 . 0 0 $ 5 . 7 0 $ 8 , 8 0 0 . 8 0 $6 , 1 7 6 . 0 0 $ 8 , 8 0 0 . 8 0 $8,800.80 Kn i f e R i v e r Co n s t r u c t i o n AD D I T I V E B I D 1 0 - S U R F A C E T R E A T M E N T - T H O M P S O N S T R E E T A. I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L S E C T I O N A - I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D Br a z o s V a l l e y Se r v i c e s TO T A L A M O U N T O F A D D I T I V E B I D 1 0 $6 , 1 7 6 . 0 0 76 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M DE S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L 12 5 A Se a l C o a t s u r f a c e t r e a t m e n t i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 1, 4 9 5 S Y $ 4 . 0 0 $ 5 , 9 8 0 . 0 0 $ 5 . 8 0 $ 8 , 6 7 1 . 0 0 $5 , 9 8 0 . 0 0 $ 8 , 6 7 1 . 0 0 Kn i f e R i v e r Co n s t r u c t i o n AD D I T I V E B I D 1 1 - S U R F A C E T R E A T M E N T - E D W A R D S T R E E T A. I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D TO T A L A M O U N T O F A D D I T I V E B I D 1 1 TO T A L S E C T I O N A - I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D $5 , 9 8 0 . 0 0 $ 8 , 6 7 1 . 0 0 Br a z o s V a l l e y Se r v i c e s 77 Co l l e g e P a r k / B r e e z y H e i g h t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Bi d N o . 0 8 - 8 5 Pr o j e c t N o . S T 0 5 0 7 IT E M DE S C R I P T I O N Q T Y U N I T U N I T P R I C E T O T A L U N I T P R I C E T O T A L 12 5 A Se a l C o a t s u r f a c e t r e a t m e n t i n c l u d i n g r e l a t e d i t e m s & ap p u r t e n a n c e s , c o m p l e t e i n p l a c e 2, 5 7 7 S Y $ 4 . 0 0 $ 1 0 , 3 0 8 . 0 0 $ 4 . 8 0 $ 1 2 , 3 6 9 . 6 0 $1 0 , 3 0 8 . 0 0 $ 1 2 , 3 6 9 . 6 0 $12,369.60 Kn i f e R i v e r Co n s t r u c t i o n A. I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D AD D I T I V E B I D 1 2 - S U R F A C E T R E A T M E N T - E L E A N O R S T R E E T TO T A L S E C T I O N A - I T E M S T O B E A D D E D T O B A S E B I D Br a z o s V a l l e y Se r v i c e s TO T A L A M O U N T O F A D D I T I V E B I D 1 2 $1 0 , 3 0 8 . 0 0 78 v en S t T Hig hla n d St F i d e l i t y S t D e t G e o r g C G r o v e S t M ary e m St S uffolk A v eBurt S t Ti m b er St H a wthorn g h D r Dexter Dr L u t h e r S t R u s s e l l S t N e w t o n R d T o w n p l P a r k P l a c e P a r k P l a c e Windin g R F airvie w A v e A yrs hire St M o ntclair A v e H ereford St T h o m a s S t Dexter Dr WOld J e r s e y S t G u e r n s e y S t B e l l S t W els h A v e P a r k P l a c e J College Park/Breezy Heights Rehabilitation Project Location Map 79 RESOLUTION NO._______________ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, APPROVING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE COLLEGE PARK BREEZY HEIGHTS REHABILITATION PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS. WHEREAS, the City of College Station, Texas, solicited bids for the construction phase of the College Park/Breezy Heights Rehabilitation Project; and WHEREAS, the selection of Brazos Valley Services is being recommended as the lowest responsible bidder for the construction services related to the College Park/Breezy Heights Rehabilitation Project; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That the City Council hereby finds that Brazos Valley Services is the lowest responsible bidder. PART 2: That the City Council hereby approves the contract with Brazos Valley Services for the Base Bid with Alternate Bids 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 and Additive Bids 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 in the total amount of $4,116,581.28 for the labor, materials and equipment required for the improvements related the College Park/Breezy Heights Rehabilitation Project. PART 3: That the funding for this Contract shall be as budgeted from the Streets Capital Fund, Public Works Division, in the amount of $1,531,588.28, from the Drainage Capital Fund, Public Works Division, in the amount of $200,000.00, from the Water Capital Improvements Fund, Utilities Division, in the amount of $1,372,815.00 and from the Wastewater Capital Improvements Fund, Utilities Division, in the amount of $1,012,178.00. PART 4: That this resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its passage. ADOPTED this day of , A.D. 2008. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary MAYOR APPROVED: E-Signed by Carla A. Robinson VERIFY authenticity with ApproveIt City Attorney 80 September 11, 2008 Consent Agenda Item No. 2o Project No. GG0402 Installation of Access and Security Equipment at the College Station Police Department To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Chuck Gilman, Director of Capital Projects Agenda Caption: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the approval of a construction contract (Contract #08-273) with Siemens Building Technologies Inc. in the amount of $104,471.45 for the installation of access and security equipment at the College Station Police Department Building. Recommendation(s): Staff recommends award of the contract to Siemens Building Technologies, Inc. for $104,471.45. Summary: This contract is for the installation of access and security equipment at the College Station Police Department Building. This purchase will be made utilizing the Texas Building and Procurement Commissions Catalog Information Systems Vendor list (C.I.S.V.). Purchases made from the State CISV program satisfy our requirement for competitive bidding. Purchasing this access/security system follows the management team decision to standardize the cities access/security systems. The security improvements at the Police Department Building will include door access devices, audio and video surveillance for the interior of the building, and video surveillance for the exterior of the building. This is work is part of the planned programming being done as a part of current Police Department Renovations Project. Budget & Financial Summary: Funds are budgeted and available through the General Government Capital Fund as part of the Police Department Renovations Project. The current project budget is $3,686,000.00. Funds in the amount of $2,863,572.08 have been expended or committed to date, leaving a balance of $822,427.92. Attachments: 1. Resolution 81 RESOLUTION NO._______________ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, APPROVING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT RENOVATIONS PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS. WHEREAS, the City of College Station, Texas, desires to contract for the installation of access and security equipment as part of the College Station Police Department Renovations Project; and WHEREAS, Siemens Building Technologies, Inc. is being recommended as the contractor selected for the installation of access and security equipment as part of the Police Department Renovations Project; and WHEREAS, this selection is made through the Texas Building and Procurement Commissions Catalog Information Systems Vendor List which satisfies the City’s competitive bidding requirements; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That the City Council hereby selects Siemens Building Technologies, Inc. through the Texas Building and Procurement Commissions Catalog Information Systems Vendor List. PART 2: That the City Council hereby approves the contract with Siemens Building Technologies, Inc. for $104,471.45 for the labor, materials and equipment required for the installation of access and security equipment related the Police Department Renovations Project. PART 3: That the funding for this Contract shall be as budgeted from the General Government Capital Fund in the amount of $104,471.45. PART 4: That this resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its passage. ADOPTED this day of , A.D. 2008. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary MAYOR APPROVED: E-Signed by Carla A. Robinson VERIFY authenticity with ApproveIt City Attorney 82 September 11, 2008 Consent Agenda Item No. 2p Roadway Impact Fees Professional Services Contract To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Mark Smith, Director of Public Works Agenda Caption: Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Professional Services Contract with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (KHA), in the amount of $87,000.00, for the engineering development and implementation of a Roadway Impact Fee program. Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of the Professional Services Contract between the City of College Station and KHA. SUMMARY: At the June 12, 2008 Council Workshop Meeting, City Council directed staff to proceed to get a consultant under contract to begin preparations for a Roadway Impact Fee. Staff has since negotiated the attached Professional Services Contract and associated Scope of Services with KHA. Under this proposed contract, KHA would provide the associated engineering and professional services for Council to ultimately consider an ordinance to implement Roadway Impact Fees. The Scope of Services also includes a number of meetings with City staff, City Council, City committees, and stakeholders. This effort is intended to dovetail with the Comprehensive Plan Update and specifically the Land Use Plan and Thoroughfare Plan updates. The Comprehensive Plan Update is projected to be adopted in Spring 2009, so ordinances(s) for Roadway Impact Fees should follow shortly after that. Budget & Financial Summary: As a professional services contract, this project is exempt from Texas competitive bidding requirements, LGC 252.022 (a)(4). KHA was selected for this project as an extension of the Master Agreement for Transportation Services Contract and the Thoroughfare Plan with the Comprehensive Plan Update Contract. Funds for this item were not included in the FY08 Approved Budget. The proposed Budget Amendment will appropriate funds in the amount of $87,000 for the study. $30,000 of this appropriation will come from General Fund contingency and will be appropriated to the Public Works Engineering budget and $57,000 will be appropriated in the Streets Capital Improvement Projects budget. Attachments: 1. Contract 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 September 11, 2008 Consent Agenda Item No. 2q Council Strategic Plan To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: City Manager’s Office Agenda Caption: Presentation, possible action, and discussion of the City Council’s 2008-2013 Strategic Plan. Recommendation(s): Adopt the 2008-2013 City Council Strategic Plan as modified by Council discussion during the retreat. Summary: The Council Strategic Plan presented with this item is being brought forward as a result of City Council discussion during their Strategic Planning Retreat. The revised Council Strategic Plan contains a few additions to the document adopted last year and these changes are based on the input received by the Council at their July retreat. The main additions to the plan are the inclusion of Neighborhood Integrity and Green College Station as strategic issues. The document also now includes a Council Vision Statement Summary as well as City Management Priorities. Proposed additions and changes to the policy are underlined. Budget & Financial Summary: None. Attachments: 1. 2008-2013 Council Strategic Plan 113 Draft August 2008 Page 1 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Strategic Plan 2008-2013 In College Station, we strive to set the bar. We conduct daily business as a City aiming to provide our citizens with the best quality of life possible. The City Council and City staff work hard to ensure that we are moving in a direction that is best for the overall character and betterment of our community based on the voices and opinions of those living in College Station. A highly qualified workforce, an extremely engaged citizenry and a set of focused goals are the cornerstones of what make this a successful community. As a rapidly growing city, we recognize the importance of neighborhood integrity as well as responsible growth in our communities. We focus on forward thinking policies that retain the integrity and standard of service to which our citizens have become accustomed. Efforts made to Green College Station and constructing a new City Hall are endeavors this City pursues in order to reach the next level. The Strategic Plan is a collaboration of the City Council and the numerous City departments working together to create a cohesive forward direction for College Station in the upcoming years. Updates were made to the plan as a result of the City Council’s annual strategic planning retreat. In addition to adding the two new strategic issues of Neighborhood Integrity and Green College Station, other policy goals and direction are interspersed throughout the document. Following, you will find an outline for the goals and practices we have set to achieve in the near future so that each citizen may enjoy a greater quality of life than ever before. Mission Statement ON BEHALF OF THE CITIZENS OF COLLEGE STATION, HOME OF TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY, WE WILL CONTINUE TO PROMOTE AND ADVANCE THE COMMUNITY'S QUALITY OF LIFE. 114 Draft August 2008 Page 2 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Community Vision Statement College Station, the proud home of Texas A&M University and the heart of the Brazos Valley, will be a vibrant, progressive, knowledge-based community which promotes the highest quality of life by … Ø ensuring safe, tranquil, clean, and healthy neighborhoods with enduring character; Ø increasing and maintaining the mobility of College Station citizens through a well planned and constructed inter-modal transportation system; Ø expecting sensitive development and management of the built and natural environment; Ø supporting well planned, quality and sustainable growth; Ø valuing and protecting our cultural and historical community resources; Ø developing and maintaining quality cost-effective community facilities, infrastructure and services which ensure our city is cohesive and well connected; and Ø pro-actively creating and maintaining economic and educational opportunities for all citizens. College Station will remain among the friendliest and most responsive of communities and a demonstrated partner in maintaining and enhancing all that is good and celebrated in the Brazos Valley. It will forever be a place where Texas and the world come to learn. 115 Draft August 2008 Page 3 STRATEGIC PLAN City of College Station Core Values To promote: • The health, safety, and general well being of the community • Excellence in customer service • Fiscal responsibility • Involvement and participation of the citizenry • Collaboration and cooperation • Regionalism: be active member of the Brazos Valley community and beyond • Activities that promote municipal empowerment Organizational Values • Respect everyone • Deliver excellent service • Risk, Create, Innovate • Be one city, one team • Be personally responsible • Do the right thing – act with integrity and honesty • Have fun Using the community vision, mission statement, and values as a spring board, the College Station City Council has set the strategic direction for the city government through development of ten Strategic Issues and supporting Policy Initiatives. The Strategic Plan focuses organizational resources and identifies those intentional actions to be undertaken by city government to achieve the desired outcomes. 116 Draft August 2008 Page 4 STRATEGIC PLAN Citywide Safety & Security Safety and security of College Station citizens is imperative. We want to ensure all citizens and visitors to the community feel safe while enjoying the quality of life offered by College Station. _______________________________________________________________________ Policy Initiatives § Invest in our public safety infrastructure to provide consistent and high quality public safety services § Benchmark our public safety services with other similar communities to ensure we are setting the pace at a national level Effective Communications Effective two-way communications with both internal and external audiences is essential to the continued success of the many programs and services offered by the City of College Station. Utilizing a variety of media and technology, we will strive to market our services, communicate our mission and values, engage our citizens in the decisions of city government while telling the College Station story to our elected officials, employees, citizens, community partners, and others nationwide. _____________________________________________________________________________ Policy Initiatives § Implement a communication strategy which continually informs our citizens about the city government § Market the City of College Station as a superior service provider § Cultivate citizen trust by fostering and practicing open, accountable and responsible government § Interact with appointed committees to ensure the City Council’s vision and expectations are known and adhered to when discussing policy 117 Draft August 2008 Page 5 STRATEGIC PLAN Growing Sustainable Revenue Sources Balanced with Needs The ability of College Station to finance quality services, meet demands of growing our infrastructure and provide for the quality of life quotient for the community, requires fiscal soundness and growing our revenue sources. We will adhere to sound business practices which obtain true value for dollars spent, diversify our revenue sources through identification of innovative revenue strategies, and implement financial policies which protect city resources. _____________________________________________________________________________ Policy Initiatives § Develop innovative income strategies to diversify and strengthen income base § Re-evaluate and update financial policies to ensure they continually meet our needs as a city government § Improve business practices to ensure we achieve the best value for dollars invested Destination Place to Live and Work We want College Station to be a destination city which attracts visitors, residents, businesses, and investment. In promoting and maintaining a high quality of life, we want to be a community which provides diverse opportunities for work, entertainment, livable neighborhoods, and business development. We want College Station to be among the best cool places to live in the United States. _______________________________________________________________________ Policy Initiatives § Invest in infrastructure and programs that create a sense of place for College Station citizens § Identify and invest in those programs and activities that promote College Station as a cool place to live, work , and play 118 Draft August 2008 Page 6 STRATEGIC PLAN Exceptional Multi-modal Mobility The rapid growth of College Station is impacting our ability to provide an efficient public and private transportation network to ensure mobility and safety to our citizens. Development of an efficient multi-modal transportation system is needed to promote a healthy local economy and support the community’s quality of life. _____________________________________________________________________________ Policy Initiatives § Develop a transportation plan that supports the development of College Station in regard to its land use and transportation needs § Implement our transportation plan to improve our overall transportation network and support development of the community § Improve operational efficiency of our existing transportation network § Implement state of the art transportation management programs and systems § Lobby for state and federal transportation funds to continually improve our transportation systems Sustainable Quality City Workforce Our employees are our most valued asset. We want to ensure the City of College Station work environment is exceptional while encouraging innovation and creativity. We want to be able to attract the best and brightest and retain highly competent individuals who serve the citizens of College Station. _____________________________________________________________________________ Policy Initiatives § Create a work environment that attracts and retains quality employees 119 Draft August 2008 Page 7 STRATEGIC PLAN Exceptional Infrastructure and Core Services Our core mission is the delivery of exceptional services to our citizens. Our infrastructure is the backbone of our service delivery system and we will continually make prudent investments to grow and maintain all infrastructure to support our delivery of services. We will expect our core services to be to of the highest quality. We expect our services to our customer to be focused, timely and cost effective. _____________________________________________________________________________ Policy Initiatives § Ensure our infrastructure is well maintained and expands to meet the needs of our citizens and various city services § Provide core city services that are customer focused, cost effective and of the highest quality Diverse Growing Economy We want to promote through effective policies and programs the continued growth and diversification of our economy. We will provide leadership to encourage the diversification of our economy while actively collaborating with our community partners to produce economic benefit to all citizens. _____________________________________________________________________________ Policy Initiatives § Develop and implement specific plans to enhance and diversify our tax base § Develop and implement plans which promote redevelopment of strategic areas of College Station § Seek economic development opportunities and partnerships which position College Station as a national center for bio-technology § Enhance tourism with the development of needed infrastructure to support the tourism segment of our economy 120 Draft August 2008 Page 8 STRATEGIC PLAN Neighborhood Integrity Neighborhoods are the basic building blocks of our city. Neighborhoods are where we live, raise our families, and socialize with our friends and neighbors. In many ways our city is only as strong and sustainable as our neighborhoods. Our challenge is to welcome the increasing number of students while retaining the strength and vitality of our neighborhoods. _____________________________________________________________________________ Policy Initiatives § Promote comprehensive planning and management of growth § Ensure College Station remains a highly livable city driven by quality of life § Improve the capacity of neighborhoods to deal with planning and quality of life issues § Orient service delivery toward neighborhoods § Enhance the City’s enforcement tools to better address the rental market § Educate key stakeholders and the community § Promote the development of sustainable neighborhoods that address the needs of various population groups 121 Draft August 2008 Page 9 STRATEGIC PLAN Green College Station Sustainability and resource conservation has become a constant on the local government landscape. There is a clear case to be made for sustainability and conservation of resources in College Station. Our emphasis on the quality of life for the community demands that we aggressively work towards creating a culture in the community which embraces sustainability as its mantra. _______________________________________________________________________ Policy Initiatives § Include renewable green energy in a portion of our purchased power while reducing the overall energy consumption § Reduce our overall per capita water consumption § Develop mechanisms to reuse water in the community § Reduce the overall volume of waste generated in the community while developing environmentally sound and economically feasible means to dispose of waste § Develop specific strategies to promote efficient use of our land while protecting our natural resources § Promote open and green space as a prominent component of our community character § Inventory global warming emissions in the City operations as well as in the community and set realistic reduction targets 122 Draft August 2008 Page 10 STRATEGIC PLAN City of College Station Council Vision Statement Summary 2008-2009 Ø Continue development of Neighborhood Integrity Strategy Ø Encourage neighborhood development targeted for students Ø Analyze financial long term stability of the city - making growth pay for itself Ø Promote strong intergenerational parks Ø Define opportunities for improved business and industrial growth Ø Continue building foundation for Green College Station Initiative Ø Convention Center: Future direction Ø Improve overall political health within city government and promote communication between various stakeholders Ø City Hall/ City Center: Goal, Strategy, Actions Ø Evaluate alternative transportation options and address transportation issues Ø Increased interaction with appointed committees to ensure the Council’s vision and expectations are known Ø Secure infrastructure for the next 20+ years Ø Create an accessible wireless system Ø Improve hike and bike trails 123 Draft August 2008 Page 11 STRATEGIC PLAN City of College Station City Management Priorities 2008-2009 Ø Fill vacant upper management positions Ø Green College Station initiatives Ø Successful completion of 2008 bond issue Ø Comprehensive Plan Update Ø Capital Improvement Projects progress Ø Address City Hall needs Ø Make Hotel Convention Center a reality Ø Complete overhaul of Neighborhood Services structure Ø Complete Police Management Review and HR Classification Study Ø Continue to identify ways to motivate and re-energize staff Ø Seek creative ways to fund City government and new initiatives 124 September 11, 2008 Consent Agenda Item 2r Third Party Claims Administration To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Kathy Merrill, Asst. City Manager Agenda Caption: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding contract for Third Party Claims Administration with A S & G Claims Administration, Inc. for an annual expenditure of $52,000. Anticipated workers compensation claims for FY09 are $401,000 and anticipated liability claims for FY09 are $330,000. Recommendation(s): The Cities of Bryan and College Station issued a joint request for proposals for third-party claims administration. Ten responsive proposals were received and reviewed. Staff recommends approval of the contract with A S & G Claims Administration, Inc. for the City’s third-party claims administration, and authorization to pay up to $731,000 for anticipated workers compensation and liability claims. Summary: The City of College Station is self-insured, which requires the services of claims adjustment on all workers compensation claims and significant liability claims. A S & G Claims Administration, Inc. has provided excellent customer service while continuing to assist the City in reducing the costs of claims administration. This contract is effective October 1, 2008, and provides for four (4) one-year renewals. Budget & Financial Summary: Funds are available in the FY09 budget in the Property Casualty Fund and the Workers Compensation Fund. Expenditures for claims administration are increased $2000, or .04 percent over FY08. Attachments: Contract for third-party claims administration is available in the City Secretary’s Office. 125 RESOLUTION NO._______________ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, APPROVING A CONTRACT FOR THIRD PARTY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS. WHEREAS, the City of College Station, Texas, and the City of Bryan, Texas, solicited proposals for a contract for Third Party Claims Administration of Workers Compensation and selected property casualty liability claims; and WHEREAS, the selection of A S & G Claims Administration, Inc. is recommended as the proposal of best value for services related to third-party claims administration; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That the City Council hereby finds that A S & G Claims Administration, Inc. submitted the proposal with the best value. PART 2: That the City Council hereby approves the contract with A S & G Claims Administration, Inc. for $52,000 for workers compensation and selected property casualty liability claims administration. PART 3: That the City Council authorizes $52,000 for claims administration, and $731,000 for workers compensation claims and property casualty liability claims. PART 4: That the funding for this Project shall be as budgeted from the Property Casualty budget in the amount of $330,000, and the Workers Compensation budget in the amount of $401,000 for claims, and $52,000 for claims administration. PART 5: That this resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its passage. ADOPTED this day of , A.D. 2008. ATTEST: APPROVED: City Secretary Mayor APPROVED: E-Signed by Mary Ann Powell VERIFY authenticity with ApproveIt City Attorney 126 September 11, 2008 Regular Agenda Item No. 1 Public Hearing #1 for FY 09 Ad Valorem Tax Rate To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Jeff Kersten, Chief Financial Officer Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, possible action and discussion on the City of College Station 2008-2009 advertised ad valorem tax rate of $0.450000 per $100 valuation. Also discussion and possible action on announcing the meeting date, time and place to adopt the tax rate. Recommendation(s): Hold public hearing and receive citizen input on the tax rate. Summary: The Texas Property Tax Code requires that if an entity wishes to increase tax revenues over the effective tax rate then that entity must call and hold two public hearings on the proposed tax rate. Following each public hearing the City Council must announce the meeting date, time and place to adopt the tax rate. The tax rate that the City Council announced it would hold a public hearing on is $0.450000 per $100 assessed valuation. Holding the public hearing on this tax rate provides the City Council with flexibility in determining what the tax rate will be. The notice of this public hearing was placed in the Eagle, as well as on the City's internet site, and the City's television channel. The second public hearing on the tax rate is scheduled for Wednesday September 17th. The City Council will vote on the tax rate on Thursday September 25. Budgetary and Financial Summary: The public hearing tax rate of $0.450000 per $100 assessed valuation will generate $22,608,694 in taxes. The property taxes are used to fund the general debt service of the City as well as a portion of the operations and maintenance costs of the General Fund. Attachments: N/A 127 September 11, 2008 Regular Agenda Item No. 2 Public Hearing for FY 08- 09 Proposed Budget To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Jeff Kersten, Chief Financial Officer Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on the City of College Station 2008-2009 proposed budget. Recommendation(s): Hold public hearing on proposed budget and receive citizen input. Summary: The City Charter requires that the City Council call and hold a public hearing on the proposed budget; and that after such public hearing, the Council may insert or decrease items so long as the total of any increases and insertions do not increase the total budget by more than 3%. The proposed budget was presented to the City Council on August 18, 2008. Four budget workshops were scheduled to review the proposed budgets. The four workshops were held on August 20th, August 21st, September 3rd, and September 4th. On August 18, 2008, the City Council called a public hearing on the FY 08-09 Proposed Budget. A notice announcing the public hearing was published in accordance with City Charter and State Law requirements. The FY 2008-2009 Budget is scheduled to be adopted on September 25, 2008. Budgetary and Financial Summary: The following is an overall summary of the proposed budget. Subtotal Operation and Maintenance: $196,555,178 Subtotal Capital: 45,649,073 Total Proposed Budget: $242,204,251 Attachments: Please bring Proposed FY 08-09 Budget. 128 September 11, 2008 Regular Agenda Item No. 3 Public Hearing and Consideration of Budget Amendment #3 To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Jeff Kersten, Chief Financial Officer Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, possible action, and discussion on an ordinance Budget Amendment #3 amending ordinance number 2999 which will amend the budget for the 2007-2008 Fiscal Year and authorizing amended expenditures in the amount of $11,061,623 and presentation, possible action and discussion on several contingency transfers and an interfund loan. Recommendation(s): Staff recommends the City Council hold the public hearing on Budget Amendment #3, and approve the budget amendment ordinance. Staff recommends the City Council approve the budget transfers. Summary: The proposed budget amendment is to increase the appropriations for the items listed below by $11,061,623. In addition, several General Fund contingency transfer items are included below. Contingency transfers do not increase or decrease the overall budget. Rather, the contingency transfers shift resources within a fund. Contingency transfers greater than $15,000 require Council approval and are therefore included as part of this Budget Amendment documentation. Finally, interfund loans also require Council approval and are therefore also included as part of this Budget Amendment documentation. Budget & Financial Summary: The City has resources or can reasonably expect resources to cover each of the appropriations in this budget amendment. Budget transfers do not affect the overall budget within a fund, they shift resources within the fund. Attachments: 1. Budget Amendment #3 Detail List, Budget transfer detail list 2. Ordinance 129 Fiscal Year 2007-2008 Budget Amendment #3, Contingency Transfer and Interfund Loan Detail Listing The proposed budget amendment is to increase the appropriations for the items listed below by $11,061,623. In addition, several General Fund contingency transfer items are included below. Contingency transfers do not increase or decrease the overall budget. Rather, the contingency transfers shift resources within a fund. Contingency transfers greater than $15,000 require Council approval and are therefore included as part of this Budget Amendment documentation. Finally, interfund loans also require Council approval and are therefore also included as part of this Budget Amendment documentation. 1. Wellborn Road/Harvey Mitchell Parkway Landscape AFA: $382,054 (Budget Amendment) On August 18, 2008, Council approved an AFA with TxDOT in the amount of $382,054.00 for landscape and hardscape improvements to be included in the vicinity of Wellborn Road and Harvey Mitchell Parkway. These improvements will coincide with the grade separation at this interchange. Funds for this AFA were not included in the FY08 Capital Projects budget, but are available Streets Capital Improvement Project Fund balance. 2. Wellborn Road Landscape AFA – FM 2818 to Highway 40: $3,875 (Budget Amendment) On April 10, 2008, Council approved an AFA with TxDOT in the amount of $92,984 to install, as part of the Wellborn Road Widening project, landscape and hardscape improvements on Wellborn Road from just south of 2818 to just south of State Highway 40. The appropriation for this AFA was included on FY08 Budget Amendment #2. TxDOT has received bids on the project, and the estimate for the City’s share of the project is now $96,859. This item will appropriate the additional budget needed for the project. These funds are available in the Streets Capital Improvement Project Fund balance. 3. Thomas/Adamson Pool Bath Houses: $300,000 (Budget Amendment) The project budget for the Thomas Pool Bath House is $333,000. Design, in the amount of $33,000, was originally planned and budgeted for FY08 and construction, in the amount of $300,000, was planned for FY09. The FY09 funds have not yet been budgeted. The construction bids on the Adamson Pool Bath House were recently received and are over the budget of that project. It is being proposed that a portion of the budget for the Thomas Pool Bath House be used for the Adamson Pool Bath House project. This will result in the need for additional funding on the Thomas Pool Bath House project, and will likely result in the delay of the Thomas Pool Bath House construction. This item will appropriate the remaining budget to the Thomas Pool Bath House project, a portion of which will then be transferred to the Adamson Pool Bath House project. Funding for these projects is from Certificates of Obligation issued in FY08 and these funds are available in the Parks Capital Improvement Projects Fund. The CO debt language was written in such a way that the funds can be used for either or both of these projects. 4. Zone 2 Parkland – University Park: $31,468 (Budget Amendment) On August 18, 2008 Council approved a change order on the construction contract for University Park, Edelweiss Park and Woodland Hills Park. Funds for the portion of the change order applicable to University Park are available in the Parkland Dedication Zone 2 Fund balance, but are not budgeted. This item will appropriate the funds for this project in the Zone 2 Parkland Dedication Fund. 5. Memorial Cemetery: $640,000 (Budget Amendment) On March 27, 2008, Council approved a contract for the construction of the Memorial Cemetery. It is anticipated that an additional funds in the amount of approximately $640,000 will be needed to complete the Memorial Cemetery project. This amount was not included in the original budget and is for items such the Construction Inspector (approved by Council on August 6, 2008), change orders, staff time, easement acquisition and material testing. It is anticipated that funds generated by the Memorial Cemetery lot sales will be used to fund the additional anticipated expenses. However, if sufficient funds are not generated to support the additional expenses, additional Certificates of Obligation may be issued. This item will appropriate the additional funds for the project in the General Government Capital Improvement Projects Fund. 6. Eisenhower Land Purchase: $73,000 (Budget Amendment) On August 18, 2008, Council approved a real estate contract in the amount of $70,000 for the purchase of real estate needed for the future extension of Eisenhower Street. The purchase price of the property is $70,000. Closing costs and associated expenses are estimated at $3,000. This item will appropriate the budget for the land purchase. These funds are available in the Streets Capital Improvement Project Fund balance. 7. Purchased Power: $3,044,000 (Budget Amendment) This item will appropriate funds for the unanticipated increase in the cost of purchased power. The increase in the purchased power costs is due primarily to increased usage by customers and increases due to usage will be offset by revenue received. These funds are available in the Electric Fund balance. 130 8. Channel 19 Improvements – $45,843 (Budget Amendment) The Communications Department Staff requests the remaining EG fee receipts to improve CSTV-19 operations and support programming identified in the Communications Plan. Funds will be used purchase new equipment and supplies for the Channel 19 studio. $45,843 has been received into project GG0407 and is available in the General Fund balance. 9. Replacement of Police Patrol Car - $27,175 (Budget Amendment) This item is for the replacement of a police patrol vehicle that was totaled in a one-vehicle crash on May 14, 2008. The total amount approved for replacement of the vehicle is $27,175 of which the Equipment Replacement Fund will contribute $12,000; the Property Casualty Fund will contribute $14,425 and the Police Department will contribute the $750 deductible. All of the necessary funds are available in the designated fund balances. This item will appropriate the funds in the Equipment Replacement Fund for the replacement of the Police Patrol Car. In addition, as transfers between funds require Council approval, the item will provide for this approval. 10. Convention Center Land Purchase: Convention Center Fund: $1,710,000; Hotel Tax Fund: $2,510,000; Total: $4,220,000 (Budget Amendment) This item will appropriate funds for the costs of a land purchase associated with a new Convention Center. These funds are available in the Hotel Tax Fund balance. The funds will be transferred from the Hotel Tax Fund to the Convention Center Fund for expenditure. 11. Red Light Camera Fund Expenses - $35,000 (Budget Amendment) Staff from departments including Public Works, Finance, Municipal Court and the Police Department has spent time in the administration of the red light camera program. This time has been tracked as part of a project, but the salary and benefit expenses have occurred out of the General Fund. This item will appropriate funds in the Red Light Camera Fund for City staff time and expenses involved with administration of the red light camera program. These funds will be transferred from the Red Light Camera Fund to the General Fund to reimburse for expenses related to the program. 12. Legal Fees: $70,000 (Budget Amendment) This item is for the appropriation of funds in the amount of $70,000 for the estimated legal expenses associated with the litigation with the City of Bryan pertaining to BVSWMA. These funds will be budgeted in the General Fund and are available in the General Fund balance. 13. Economic Development Land Purchase: $1,332,208 Economic Development Fund and $200,000 General Fund (Budget Amendments); $200,000 (General Fund Contingency Transfer); $600,000 (Interfund Loans) On July 10, 2008, Council approved the purchase of land in the Northgate area for Economic Development purposes. $400,000 for the land purchase is from the General Fund balance and $332,208 is from the Economic Development Fund balance. In addition, interfund loans in the amount of $200,000 each ($600,000 total) from the Water, Wastewater and Electric funds will fund the balance of the purchase. The interfund loans will be repaid to the Utilities over a period of five years at $40,000 per year per Utility. This item will appropriate funds in the amount of $1,332,208 in the Economic Development Fund for the purchase of the land. $400,000 of these funds will be transferred from the General Fund to the Economic Development Fund. $200,000 will come from General Fund contingency and $200,000 is available in the General Fund balance. As contingency transfers greater than $15,000 must be approved by Council, this item will provide for approval of the contingency transfer. Finally, the item will provide for approval of the interfund loans from the Water, Wastewater and Electric Utilities as described above. 14. Roadway Impact Fee Study – $57,000 (Budget Amendment); $30,000 (General Fund Contingency Transfer) This item will appropriate funds for a roadway impact fee study as directed by Council. The goal of the study is for the consultant to lead in the development and implementation of a Roadway Impact Fee policy for the City of College Station. Funds for this item were not included in the FY08 Approved Budget. This item will appropriate funds in the amount of $87,000 for the study. $30,000 of this appropriation will come from General Fund contingency and will be appropriated to the Public Works Engineering budget. As contingency transfers greater than $15,000 must be approved by Council, this item will provide for approval of the contingency transfer. The additional $57,000 will be appropriated in the Streets Capital Improvement Projects budget and is available in the Streets Capital Improvement Projects fund balance. 15. Lodging Expenses for the Police Chiefs – $24,083 (General Fund Contingency Transfer) The Police department is requesting funds to cover the lodging expenses for the interim and new Police Chiefs. The Police department has been able to use savings in other areas to cover costs associated with the interim Police Chief as well as a majority of expenses related to the new Police Chief’s benefits package. The $24,083 will cover the ninety days of lodging allowed for both Chief Whitmire and Chief Ikner per their respective 131 contracts. Lodging expenses related to Chief Whitmire total $13,690 and $10,393 for Chief Ikner. Funds for this appropriation are available in General Fund contingency. Per fiscal policy, contingency transfers greater than $15,000 must be approved by Council, this item will provide for approval of the contingency transfer. 16. Internal Auditor Moving Expenses – $15,162 (General Fund Contingency Transfer) The Internal Auditor Division is requesting a general contingency transfer in the amount of $15,162 to cover the contractual benefits package for the Internal Auditor. As a result of this division being budgeted for one individual, there are no areas of savings. Costs associated with this transfer include moving expenses, ninety days of lodging and two house hunting allowances as detailed in the contract. These expenses were not included in the original budget for the Internal Auditor. Funds for this appropriation are available in General Fund contingency. As contingency transfers greater than $15,000 must be approved by Council, this item will provide for approval of the contingency transfer. 132 133 September 11, 2008 Regular Agenda Item No. 4 Bike Loop-Longmire Drive Pedestrian Improvements Project Final Design Presentation To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Chuck Gilman, Director of Capital Projects Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion concerning approval to advertise for construction bids for the Bike Loop project which includes pedestrian improvements to the intersection of Longmire and Harvey Mitchell Parkway. Recommendation(s): Staff recommends proceeding with advertisement for the construction bid of the Longmire intersection improvements, bicycle lanes, and Bee Creek bridge. Summary: The Bike Loop Project includes bicycle lanes on Longmire, Longmire Drive-FM 2818 intersection improvements, a pedestrian bridge across Bee Creek, and completion of the third and final phase of the College Station Bike Loop project. Staff recommends bidding the Bike Loop around Bee Creek Park project separately at a later date and proceeding forward at this time with the bid for the Longmire intersection improvements, bike lanes along Longmire, and the bridge across Bee Creek. The requirements associated with the ISTEA grant for the Bike Loop will likely result in an increase in the construction cost. Staff is recommending that this potential cost increase associated with the grant be limited to only the bike loop phase of the project. Additionally, it is anticipated that TxDOT will need an additional 4 to 6 months to complete the administrative review of the Bike Loop portion of the project. The Longmire Intersection design includes pedestrian improvements with channelized turn lanes, deceleration and acceleration lanes, medians on Longmire, and pedestrian crosswalks and signals. The intersection improvements along with the bike lanes on Longmire and the bridge crossing Bee Creek will increase multimodal mobility within the City. Budget & Financial Summary: The construction cost for the Longmire improvements, striping and bridge is estimated at $590,000. Funds in the amount of $1,477,826 are budgeted for the 2005 Bike Loop project as part of the ST0530 ($327,202 - Bike Loop project), ST9803 ($169,000 - Miscellaneous Bike Trails project) and ST0521 ($981,624 - Hike and Bike Trails project). Funds in the amount of $109,096 have been expended or committed to date, leaving a balance of $1,368,730. Attachments: 1.) Project Map 134 135 September 11, 2008 Regular Agenda Item No. 5 William D. Fitch Parkway Widening Phase II Final Design Presentation To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Chuck Gilman, Director of Capital Projects Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, possible action and discussion concerning approval to advertise for the William D. Fitch Pkwy Widening Phase II project construction bid. Recommendation(s): Staff recommends proceeding with advertisement for the construction bid. Summary: The William D. Fitch Pkwy Widening Phase II Project (ST-0520) will widen W.D. Fitch Pkwy from Pebble Creek Pkwy to Rock Prairie Road from two lanes to four with a raised median. The design includes a bridge over Lick Creek with modifications to the existing bridge, landscaping, sidewalks, bike lanes, street lighting, and drainage facilities. Budget & Financial Summary: The construction cost is estimated at $4,073,500. Funds have been budgeted in the amount of $4,530,000 from the Street Capital Projects Fund and in the amount of $25,000 from the Water Capital Projects Fund. Funds in the amount of $350,576.02 have been expended or committed to date, leaving a balance of $4,204,423.98. Attachments: 1.) Project Map 136 Rock Prairie Rd W i l l i a m D . F i t c h P k w y Spe a r m a n D r R o y a l A d e l a d e Dr St An d r e w s D r C a r l l L n L a k e w a y D r O n y x D r P a r k v i e w D r A g a t e D r P e b b l e C r e e k P k w y F ir e s t o n e D r O l d e n L n A u g u s t a C i r Q u a l i ty C ir W i n g e d F o o t D r S h oal Creek Dr H o g a n A l l e y Be r r y C r e e k L a p i s C t C a s cades D r P u b li c A lley H o l s t o n H i l l s D r P u t t er C t Slic e Ct S a p p hire Ct C o l d S p r i n g D r R o c k S p r i n g C t William D. Fitch Pkwy Phase II (ST-0520) 1 inch equals 1,000 feet ± 137 September 11, 2008 Regular Agenda Item No. 6 Rock Prairie Road East Widening Project Resolution To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Chuck Gilman, Director of Capital Projects Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an Amendment to Resolutions Determining Need associated with the Rock Prairie Road East Widening, Design and ROW Project. Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of the amendment. Summary: Council has previously approved three resolutions associated with right of way acquisition on Rock Prairie Road, from State Highway 6 to William D. Fitch. Since approval of the previous resolutions, the East Side Transportation Study was completed. The acceptance and adoption of this report resulted in an amendment to the City’s Thoroughfare Plan which reclassified Rock Prairie Road. Rock Prairie Road is currently a rural collector. Prior to the Thoroughfare Plan Amendment, Rock Prairie Road was classified as a Major Arterial (120-foot wide ROW) from SH 6 to William D. Fitch. The revisions to the Thoroughfare Plan classify Rock Prairie Road as a Major Arterial (120-foot wide ROW) from SH6 to Bird Pond, a Major Collector (80-foot wide ROW) from Bird Pond to Bradley, and a Minor Arterial (100-foot wide ROW) between Bradley and William D. Fitch. Approval of this amendment will authorize staff to purchase the right-of-way and utility easements along Rock Prairie Road to allow for future roadway expansion projects. Budget & Financial Summary: The total budget for design and land acquisition for the Rock Prairie Road Widening Design and ROW Project is $2,969,000. Funding for this project is from the 2003 general obligation bond authorization. Funds in the amount of $878,569.01 have been expended or committed to date (primarily for design), leaving a balance of $2,090,430.99. Attachments: 1. Resolution 2. Exhibit “A” – Part 1 – On file in the City Secretary’s Office 3. Exhibit “A” – Part 2 – On file in the City Secretary’s Office 4. Map 138 C:\DOCUME~1\tmcnutt\LOCALS~1\Temp\Resolution revised.doc AMENDMENT TO RESOLUTIONS DETERMINING NEED RESOLUTION NO. ________________ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THREE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED RESOLUTIONS DETERMINING NEED BY REPLACING THE PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS OF ALL THREE RESOLUTIONS WITH A NEW PROPERTY DESCRIPTION. WHEREAS, the City Council of the College Station, Texas (“City”) previously authorized three resolutions for the Rock Prairie Widening Project, being Resolution No. 12-14-2006-13.03 on December 14, 2006; Resolution No. 3-8-2007-2c on March 8, 2007; and Resolution No. 3-22-2007-2d on March 22, 2007; and WHEREAS, the City desires to substitute and replace the descriptions of the property to be acquired (the “Right-of-Way and Easements”) in the previously approved resolutions with a new description for the Right of Way and easements; now therefore; BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of College Station, Texas: PART 1: That the City Council of the City of College Station, Texas, hereby officially determines that the Right-of-Way and Easements described in Exhibit “A”, which is attached to this resolution, shall, upon execution of this resolution, substitute and replace the previously approved Right-of-Way and Easements in their entirety and shall become incorporated in the above referenced resolutions as though written fully therein. PART 2: That all other parts of the previously authorized resolutions shall remain unchanged. PART 3: That this resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its passage. ADOPTED this ________ day of ____________________________, A.D. 2008. ATTEST: APPROVED: ____________________________ ______________________________ City Secretary MAYOR APPROVED: E-Signed by Carla A. Robinson VERIFY authenticity with ApproveIt ____________________________ City Attorney 139 EXHIBIT “A” to Resolution Determining Need Proposed Rock Prairie Road Rehabilitation City of College Station Texas Avenue through William D. Fitch Parkway Intersection August 2008 Right-of-Way – Fee Simple Interest – SH 6 to Flying Ace Ranch Being all those tracts or parcels of land necessary to widen the right-of-way of Rock Prairie Road from the east frontage road of Texas Avenue (State Highway 6) to the west line of that tract conveyed to the Flying Ace Ranch by deed recorded in Volume 3767 Page 237 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County. Right of way shall be widened from the present irregular width to a total right of way width of one hundred twenty feet (120’). The proposed north and south right of way boundary lines shall be parallel to the existing centerline of Rock Prairie Road and sixty feet (60’) from the centerline. Said right of way tracts or parcels of land shall be acquired from the following lands: Tract 1 All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being a part of those tracts conveyed to Edward Uvacek, Jr. as 23.233 acre First Tract and 7 acre Second Tract by deed recorded in Volume 321, Page 664 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and a part of that 4.507 acre Tract Two and that 15 acre Tract Four conveyed to Edward Uvacek, Jr. and wife Beatrice Uvacek by deed recorded in Volume 274, Page 383 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 2 All that certain 1.354 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, designated as Lot 1, Block 1 on plat of Riviera Addition described by plat recorded in Volume 6607, Page 97 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 3 All that certain 0.96 acre tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Dr. Roy R. Luepnitz by deed recorded in Volume 4792, Page 42 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 4 All that certain tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being described in deed to Marguerite H. Carroll, trustee, and Linda Carroll Lantz recorded in Volume 4297, Page 194 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 5 All that certain 45.23 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Britton Rice by deed recorded in Volume 3387, Page 115 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 6 All that certain 45.00 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Britt Rice by deed recorded in Volume 3636, Page 85 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 7 All that certain 26.25 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Dale W. Conrad by deed recorded in Volume 460, Page 505 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 27 All that certain 8.026 acre tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Exhibit “A” to Resolution Determining Need Rock Prairie Road – From SH 6 through William D. Fitch Intersection Page 1 of 9 140 Weingarten Investments, Inc. by deed recorded in Volume 8265, Page 152 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 28 All that certain 4.310 acre tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Weingarten Investments, Inc. by deed recorded in Volume 7583, Page 108 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 29 All that certain 6.566 acre tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Weingarten Investments, Inc. by deed recorded in Volume 7282, Page 72 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 30 All that certain 17.21 acre tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that conveyed to Aggieland Realty Group, LLC by deed recorded in Volume 8381, Page 250 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 31 All that certain 30.00 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to College Station Independent School District by deed recorded in Volume 1033, Page 534 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 32 All that certain 25.79 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Stewart Thompson, trustee for the Brian Howard Perry Trust, by deed recorded in Volume 1980, Page 272 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 33 All that certain 10.846 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Jo Ann Atkins by deed recorded in Volume 267, Page 483 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 34 All that certain 341.60 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to W.G. Ritchey by deed recorded in Volume 237, Page 29 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 35 All that certain 11 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Willis S. Ritchey by deed recorded in Volume 260, Page 466 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Right-of-Way – Fee Simple Interest – Flying Ace Ranch to Harris Drive Being all those tracts or parcels of land necessary to widen the right-of-way of Rock Prairie Road from the west line of that tract conveyed to the Flying Ace Ranch by deed recorded in Volume 3767 Page 237 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County to Harris Drive. Right of way shall be widened from the present irregular width to a total right of way width of eighty feet (80’). The proposed south right of way boundary line shall be parallel to the existing centerline of Rock Prairie Road and sixty feet (60’) from the centerline. The proposed north right of way boundary line shall be parallel to the existing centerline of Rock Prairie Road and twenty feet (20’) from the centerline. Said right of way tracts or parcels of land shall be acquired from the following lands: Tract 8 All that certain 26.25 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Flying Ace Ranch, Ltd. by deed recorded in Volume 3767, Page 237 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Exhibit “A” to Resolution Determining Need Rock Prairie Road – From SH 6 through William D. Fitch Intersection Page 2 of 9 141 Tract 9 All that certain 26.25 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Jack P. Friedman by deed recorded in Volume 1102, Page 592 of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 10 All that certain 0.06 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being Tract 3 conveyed to Wellborn Special Utility District by deed recorded in Volume 3991, Page 197 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 11 All that certain 4.45 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Lawrence Wolken by deed recorded in Volume 401, Page 689 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 12 All that certain 210.92 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 7, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Carter Lake Development Corporation by deed recorded in Volume 250, Page 330 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 36 All of Lot 1 of the Rock Prairie Baptist Church addition as described by plat recorded in Volume 7312, Page 207 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas, Tract 37 All that certain 14 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Hoyett Taylor, Jr. by deed recorded in Volume 235, Page 194 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 38 All that certain 2.996 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Regina L. Jamieson by deed recorded in Volume 1199, Page 418 of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 39 All that certain 2.00 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Houston White by deed recorded in Volume 1249, Page 612 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Right-of-Way – Fee Simple Interest – Harris Drive through William D. Fitch Parkway Being all those tracts or parcels of land necessary to widen the right-of-way of Rock Prairie Road from the west line of Harris Drive through the intersection of William D. Fitch Parkway, from the present irregular width to a total right of way width of one hundred feet (100’). The proposed south right of way boundary line shall be parallel to the existing centerline of Rock Prairie Road and sixty feet (60’) from the centerline. The proposed north right of way boundary line shall be parallel to the existing centerline of Rock Prairie Road and forty feet (40’) from the centerline. Additional area will be needed for the intersection of Rock Prairie Road and William D. Fitch Parkway, as depicted on the accompanying exhibit. Said right of way tracts or parcels of land shall be acquired from the following lands: Tract 13 All that certain 3.57 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract designated as Harris Drive and conveyed to Carter Lake Home Owners Corporation by deed recorded in Volume 2414, Page 20 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 14 All that certain tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being Lot 1 in Carter Lake Acres as described by plat recorded in Volume 2517 Page 177 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas and being that tract conveyed to Jonathon Skare by deed recorded in Volume 3089, Page 241 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Exhibit “A” to Resolution Determining Need Rock Prairie Road – From SH 6 through William D. Fitch Intersection Page 3 of 9 142 Tract 15 All that certain 4.24 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Robert Poling by deed recorded in Volume 1326, Page 264 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 16 All that certain 11.0 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Mary B. Bradley, trustee, by deed recorded in Volume 4108, Page 223 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 17 All that certain 1.41 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Roger Pompa by deed recorded in Volume 448, Page 236 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 18 All that certain 10.00 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Marshall C. Durr by deed recorded in Volume 414, Page 238 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 19 All that certain 3.37 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Nita M. Holliday by deed recorded in Volume 4148, Page 164 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 20 All that certain 5.005 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Cutting Edge Self- Storage Adt, L.C. by deed recorded in Volume 8584, Page 30 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 21 All the remainder of that certain 200 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Dolly Dymple Olden by deed recorded in Volume 244, Page 433 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and Arthur D. Olden Family Trust by deed recorded in Volume 3711, Pages 139 and 142 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 22 All that certain 50 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Lily Caroline Watson by deed recorded in Volume 252, Page 375 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 23 All that certain 50 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to James Todd Carll by deed recorded in Volume 252, Page 439 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 24 All that certain 75 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to James T. Carll by deed recorded in Volume 252, Page 434 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 25 All that certain 1.583 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Robert Stanley by deed recorded in Volume 1947, Page 138 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 26 All that certain 35.37 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Hartzell Elkins by deed recorded in Volume 1920, Page 323 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 40 All that certain 19.61 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Archie P. Clark by deed recorded in Volume 561, Page 28 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Exhibit “A” to Resolution Determining Need Rock Prairie Road – From SH 6 through William D. Fitch Intersection Page 4 of 9 143 Tract 41 All that certain 19.69 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Eugene Savage by deed recorded in Volume 4198, Page 108 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 42 All that certain 66.32 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to the City of College Station by deed recorded in Volume 4480, page 135 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 43 All that certain 1.88 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that 1.81 acre tract conveyed to the City of College Station by deed recorded in Volume 6382, Page 234 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas and that 0.07 acre tract described by Quit Claim recorded in Volume 6362, Page 208 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 44 All that certain 75.17 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency by deed recorded in Volume 1235, Page 59 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 45 All that certain 119.53 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency by deed recorded in Volume 1231, Page 288 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 46 All that certain 76.00 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to the City of College Station by deed recorded in Volume 7159, Page 261 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 47 All that certain 44 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to the College Station Independent School District by deed recorded in Volume 8413, Page 291 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Public Utility Easement – SH 6 through William D. Fitch Parkway Being all those tracts or parcels of land necessary to make up a continuous twenty foot (20’) wide public utility easement along and adjoining the north side of the proposed north right of way boundary line of Rock Prairie Road and all those tracts or parcels of land necessary to make up a continuous twenty foot (20’) wide public utility easement along and adjoining the south side of the proposed south right of way boundary line of Rock Prairie Road, from the east frontage road of Texas Avenue (State highway 6) to the east side of William D. Fitch Parkway. Said easement tracts or parcels being part of the following tracts of land: Tract 00 PUE All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Robert Stevenson League, Abstract No 54, in Brazos County, Texas, being a part of the Plazas of Rock Prairie by plat recorded in Volume 7560, Page 225 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 1 PUE All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being a part of those tracts conveyed to Edward Uvacek, Jr. as 23.233 acre First Tract and 7 acre Second Tract by deed recorded in Volume 321, Page 664 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and a part of that 4.507 acre Tract Two and that 15 acre Tract Four conveyed to Edward Uvacek, Jr. and wife Beatrice Uvacek by deed recorded in Volume 274, Page 383 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Exhibit “A” to Resolution Determining Need Rock Prairie Road – From SH 6 through William D. Fitch Intersection Page 5 of 9 144 Tract 2 PUE All that certain 1.354 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, designated as Lot 1, Block 1 on plat of Riviera Addition described by plat recorded in Volume 6607, Page 97 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 3 PUE All that certain 0.96 acre tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Dr. Roy R. Luepnitz by deed recorded in Volume 4792, Page 42 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 4 PUE All that certain tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being described in deed to Marguerite H. Carroll, trustee, and Linda Carroll Lantz recorded in Volume 4297, Page 194 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 5 PUE All that certain 45.23 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Britton Rice by deed recorded in Volume 3387, Page 115 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 6 PUE All that certain 45.00 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Britt Rice by deed recorded in Volume 3636, Page 85 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 7 PUE All that certain 26.25 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Dale W. Conrad by deed recorded in Volume 460, Page 505 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 8 PUE All that certain 26.25 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Flying Ace Ranch, Ltd. by deed recorded in Volume 3767, Page 237 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 9 PUE All that certain 26.25 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Jack P. Friedman by deed recorded in Volume 1102, Page 592 of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 10 PUE All that certain 0.06 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being Tract 3 conveyed to Wellborn Special Utility District by deed recorded in Volume 3991, Page 197 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 11 PUE All that certain 4.45 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Lawrence Wolken by deed recorded in Volume 401, Page 689 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 12 PUE All that certain 210.92 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 7, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Carter Lake Development Corporation by deed recorded in Volume 250, Page 330 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 14 PUE All that certain tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being Lot 1 in Carter Lake Acres as described by plat recorded in Volume 2517 Page 177 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas and all of that tract conveyed to Jonathon Skare by deed recorded in Volume 3089, Page 241 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Exhibit “A” to Resolution Determining Need Rock Prairie Road – From SH 6 through William D. Fitch Intersection Page 6 of 9 145 Tract 15 PUE All that certain 4.24 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Robert Poling by deed recorded in Volume 1326, Page 264 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 16 PUE All that certain 11.0 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Mary B. Bradley, trustee, by deed recorded in Volume 4108, Page 223 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 17 PUE All that certain 1.41 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Roger Pompa by deed recorded in Volume 448, Page 236 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 18 PUE All that certain 10.00 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Marshall C. Durr by deed recorded in Volume 414, Page 238 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 19 PUE All that certain 3.37 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Nita M. Holliday by deed recorded in Volume 4148, Page 164 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 20 PUE All that certain 5.005 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Cutting Edge Self- Storage Adt, L.C. by deed recorded in Volume 8584, Page 30 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 21 PUE All the remainder of that certain 200 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Dolly Dymple Olden by deed recorded in Volume 244, Page 433 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and Arthur D. Olden Family Trust by deed recorded in Volume 3711, Pages 139 and 142 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 22 PUE All that certain 50 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Lily Caroline Watson by deed recorded in Volume 252, Page 375 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 23 PUE All that certain 50 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to James Todd Carll by deed recorded in Volume 252, Page 439 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 24 PUE All that certain 75 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to James T. Carll by deed recorded in Volume 252, Page 434 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 25 PUE All that certain 1.583 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Robert Stanley by deed recorded in Volume 1947, Page 138 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 26 PUE All that certain 35.37 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Hartzell Elkins by deed recorded in Volume 1920, Page 323 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 27 PUE All that certain 8.026 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Weingarten Investments, Inc. by deed recorded in Volume 8265, Page 152 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Exhibit “A” to Resolution Determining Need Rock Prairie Road – From SH 6 through William D. Fitch Intersection Page 7 of 9 146 Tract 28 PUE All that certain 4.310 acre tract of land lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Weingarten Investments, Inc. by deed recorded in Volume 7383, Page 108 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 29 PUE All that certain 6.566 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Weingarten Investments, Inc. by deed recorded in Volume 7282, Page 72 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 30 PUE All that certain 17.21 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that 17.21 tract conveyed to Aggieland Realty Group, LLC by deed recorded in Volume 8381, Page 250 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 31 PUE All that certain 30.00 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to College Station Independent School District by deed recorded in Volume 1033, Page 534 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 32 PUE All that certain 25.79 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Stewart Thompson, trustee for the Brian Howard Perry Trust, by deed recorded in Volume 1980, Page 272 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 33 PUE All that certain 10.846 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Jo Ann Atkins by deed recorded in Volume 267, Page 483 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 34 PUE All that certain 341.60 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to W.G. Ritchey by deed recorded in Volume 237, Page 29 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 35 PUE All that certain 11 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Willis S. Ritchey by deed recorded in Volume 260, Page 466 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 37 PUE All that certain 14 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Hoyett Taylor, Jr. by deed recorded in Volume 235, Page 194 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 38 PUE All that certain 2.996 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Regina L. Jamieson by deed recorded in Volume 1199, Page 418 of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 39 PUE All that certain 2.00 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Houston White by deed recorded in Volume 1249, Page 612 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 40 PUE All that certain 19.61 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Archie P. Clark by deed recorded in Volume 561, Page 28 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. Exhibit “A” to Resolution Determining Need Rock Prairie Road – From SH 6 through William D. Fitch Intersection Page 8 of 9 147 Exhibit “A” to Resolution Determining Need Rock Prairie Road – From SH 6 through William D. Fitch Intersection Page 9 of 9 Tract 41 PUE All that certain 19.69 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Eugene Savage by deed recorded in Volume 4198, Page 108 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 42 PUE All that certain 66.32 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to the City of College Station by deed recorded in Volume 4480, page 135 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 43 PUE All that certain 1.88 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that 1.81 acre tract conveyed to the City of College Station by deed recorded in Volume 6382, Page 234 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas and that 0.07 acre tract described by Quit Claim recorded in Volume 6362, Page 208 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 44 PUE All that certain 75.17 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency by deed recorded in Volume 1235, Page 59 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 45 PUE All that certain 119.53 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency by deed recorded in Volume 1231, Page 288 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 46 PUE All that certain 76.00 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to the City of College Station by deed recorded in Volume 7159, Page 261 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Tract 47 PUE All that certain 44 acre tract lying and being situated in the Thomas Caruthers League, Abstract No. 9, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being that tract conveyed to the College Station Independent School District by deed recorded in Volume 8413, Page 291 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas. 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 q 157 Home of Texas A&M University September 11, 2008 Regular Agenda Item No. 7 UDO Amendment—Historic Preservation Enabling Ordinance To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Bob Cowell, AICP, Director of Planning & Development Services Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on amendments to Chapter 12, City of College Station Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Ordinance Article 2 Development Review Bodies, Article 3 Development Procedures, Section 4.1 Establishment of Districts, Article 5 District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards, Article 10 Enforcement, and Section 11.2 Defined Terms as they relate to the creation of a Landmark Commission and Historic Preservation Overlay District. Recommendation(s): The Planning & Zoning Commission and staff unanimously recommend approval of the ordinance amendment. Summary: At the direction of City Council, Staff has been working on the creation of a historic preservation enabling ordinance that is intended to provide for the protection and preservation of places and areas of historical, cultural, and architectural importance and significance in College Station. While the City currently collects historic information and recognizes properties with historical markers, the current program is a social recognition and does not involve actual regulation of actions that change the property. Through the application of a Historic Preservation Overlay zoning district, property within a Historic Preservation district would be subject to higher standards for and greater regulation of construction, reconstruction, alteration, restoration, and rehabilitation. In summary, the Historic Preservation (HP) Overlay draft ordinance provides for a new Landmark Commission, a member of staff designated as the Historic Preservation Officer, a Historic Preservation Overlay Zoning District, Certificates of Appropriateness and Demolition for properties under the overlay, and specific penalties for violations of the ordinance. Budget & Financial Summary: If adopted, the City would need to establish a Historic Preservation Fund. Funding sources could be from the penalties collected from ordinance violations, grants, donations, hotel/motel taxes, and the City budget. The purpose of the fund would be to promote and implement historic preservation measures in the community. Attachments: 1. Memo to the P&Z dated Jun 19, 2008 2. Minutes from the August 14, 2008 P&Z meeting 3. Ordinance 158 Home of Texas A&M University 159 Home of Texas A&M University 1101 Texas Avenue, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM June 19, 2008 TO: Members of the Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Molly Hitchcock, AICP, Planning Administrator SUBJECT: Historic Preservation Enabling Ordinance Item summary: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on amendments to Chapter 12, City of College Station Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Ordinance Article 2 Development Review Bodies, Article 3 Development Procedures, Section 4.1 Establishment of Districts, Article 5 District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards, Article 10 Enforcement, and Section 11.2 Defined Terms as they relate to the creation of a Landmark Commission and Historic Preservation Overlay District. Item background: At the direction of City Council, Staff has been working on the creation of a historic preservation enabling ordinance that is intended to provide for the protection and preservation of places and areas of historical, cultural, and architectural importance and significance in College Station. While the City currently collects historic information and recognizes properties with historical markers, the current program is a social recognition and does not involve actual regulation of actions that change the property. Through the application of a Historic Preservation Overlay zoning district, property within a Historic Preservation district would be subject to higher standards for and greater regulation of construction, reconstruction, alteration, restoration, and rehabilitation. A draft enabling ordinance from the Texas Historical Commission, enacted ordinances from other Texas communities, discussions with the Texas Historical Commission and other communities, discussions with local stakeholders, and input from the City’s consultant, Quimby McCoy Historic Preservation Architecture, have all contributed to the proposed ordinance for College Station. In summary, the Historic Preservation (HP) Overlay draft ordinance provides for the following: 160 Home of Texas A&M University A new board A Landmark Commission would be created to provide expertise regarding historic preservation as it relates to zoning and development. The Commission’s main duties would be to survey and maintain an inventory of significant historical and cultural resources in College Station, act in an advisory role in regards to the protection of historic resources, make recommendations to the P&Z regarding the application of the HP Overlay, make recommendations to state and federal governments regarding national historic recognition, make recommendations to Council regarding the use of donated funds to promote the use of Historic Preservation Overlay districts, and act upon requests for Certificates of Appropriateness and Certificates of Demolition. New staff responsibilities A member of City staff would be the City’s Historic Preservation Officer (HPO). HPO responsibilities would include acting as the staff liaison for the Landmark Commission and coordinating the activities of the Commission with other preservation organizations. The HPO would review and report on applications related to the Historic Preservation Overlay, and would assist applicants (when necessary) with the completion of Designation Reports for rezoning application. A new overlay zoning district A Historic Preservation Overlay zoning district would be established so that the goal of historic preservation could be forwarded through zoning regulation. As an overlay, actual land uses allowed by the base zoning district would not be affected; therefore, the overlay could be applied to residential property as well as commercial. The overlay would provide for standards greater than for those properties with no overlay. The overlay could be applied to a single property, a group of properties, or a larger area—there would be no minimum or maximum area as long as the criteria for designation were being met. As drafted, to be eligible for consideration of designation, a property or group of properties would have to be a minimum of 40 years old, meet a criteria of historic significance, and possess integrity. The proposed criteria for historic significance are as follows: 1. Possess significance in history, architecture, archeology, and culture; 2. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local, regional, state, or national history; 3. Is associated with events that have made a significant impact in our past; 4. Embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; 5. Represent the work of a master designer, builder, or craftsman; 6. Represent an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood or city; and/or 7. Is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, Recorded Texas Historic Landmark, or a State Archaeological Landmark, as determined by the Texas Historical Commission. 161 Home of Texas A&M University Typically, a rezoning is considered by the Planning & Zoning Commission, who then sends their recommendation to City Council. It is proposed that a request to apply a Historic Preservation Overlay zoning district would first be considered by the Landmark Commission before going to the P&Z. Heightened regulation for properties under the overlay To ensure the integrity of the historic value of a site, virtually all changes to a property or structure that would be visible from a public right-of-way would be subject to regulation. Construction, reconstruction, restoration, rehabilitation, and material and color changes would be subject to the Landmark Commission’s consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA). Appeals to Commission’s decision on a COA would be to City Council. Any proposed demolition or removal of any structure or portion thereof would have to obtain a Certificate of Demolition (COD). For a COD to be approved, a property owner would have to prove that: 1. The structure would be replaced with a new structure that is more appropriate and compatible with the Historic Preservation Overlay district, 2. No economically viable use of the property exists, 3. The structure poses an imminent threat to public health or safety, and/or 4. The structure is noncontributing to the Historic Preservation Overlay district. Provisions are also proposed to prevent demolition by neglect of property in the overlay. Specific penalties for noncompliance A person that violates the ordinance as it relates to COAs and CODs would be held criminally responsible for their actions. They would be required to restore or replicate the damage to the property, and fines collected would be forwarded to a Historic Preservation Fund that would be used to promote and implement historic preservation measures in the community. Staff hosted two community meetings on February 13, 2008 to receive input on the proposed language. The majority of those comments were in general support for the ordinance. There were concerns about the membership of the Landmark Commission that resulted in changes to the draft. There was also some discussion of having a percentage of homeowners apply for a larger district, similar to an application for a single-family overlay. Since the Historic Preservation Overlay could be applied to one or any number of properties and because the overlay would be the most restrictive in the City, the ordinance draft was left as proposed. If a property owner does not want to pursue the overlay for his/her property, the rezoning could be initiated by City Council, the P&Z, or the Administrator. Attachments: 1. Proposed UDO Section 2.4, Landmark Commission (new UDO section) 2. Redlined UDO Section 2.6 Administrator 3. Redlined UDO Section 2.9 Summary of Review Authority 4. Redlined UDO Section 3.1 General Approval Procedures 5. Redlined UDO Section 3.2 Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning) 162 Home of Texas A&M University 6. Proposed UDO Section 3.9 Certificates of Appropriateness (new UDO section) 7. Proposed UDO Section 3.10 Certificates of Demolition (new UDO section) 8. Redlined UDO Section 3.11 Building Permit 9. Redlined UDO Section 4.1 Establishment of Districts 10. Proposed UDO Section 5.10 Historic Preservation Overlay District (new UDO section) 11. Proposed UDO Section 10.5 Specific Penalties for Certificates of Appropriateness and Certificates of Demolition (new UDO section) 12. Redlined UDO Section 11.2 Defined Terms 163 August 14, 2008 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 2 MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting Thursday, August 14, 2008 at 7:00 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Acting Chairman Noel Bauman, Paul Greer, Doug Slack and Hugh Stearn COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Chairman Nichols, Bill Davis and Thomas Woodfin CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: CITY STAFF PRESENT: Senior Planners Jennifer Prochazka and Lindsay Boyer, Staff Planners Jason Schubert and Matt Robinson, Graduate Civil Engineer Erika Bridges, Assistant City Engineer Josh Norton, Senior Assistant City Engineer Carol Cotter, City Engineer Alan Gibbs, Director Bob Cowell, Assistant Director Lance Simms, Assistant Director Gabriel Elliott, Planning Administrator Molly Hitchcock, First Assistant City Attorney Carla Robinson, Action Center Representative Kerry Mullins and Staff Assistant Brittany Caldwell 8. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on amendments to Chapter 12, City of College Station Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Ordinance Article 2 Development Review Bodies, Article 3 Development Procedures, Section 4.1 Establishment of Districts, Article 5 District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards, Article 10 Enforcement, and Section 11.2 Defined Terms as they relate to the creation of a Landmark Commission and Historic Preservation Overlay District. Case #08-00500001 (MH) Molly Hitchcock, Planning Administrator, presented the Historic Preservation Enabling Ordinance. She stated that ordinance currently states that to be eligible for consideration the property must meet one of the criteria for historic significance. The consultant requested that the property meet two of the criteria for historic significance. Acting Chairman Bauman opened the public hearing. Jerry Cooper, 602 Bell Street, College Station, Texas; Judy Hugill, 904 Francis Drive, College Station, Texas; Mike Luther, 614 Welsh Avenue, College Station, Texas. The citizens spoke in favor of the ordinance. Mr. Cooper asked that one of the alternates to the Landmark Commission be a property owner. 164 August 14, 2008 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 2 Acting Chairman Bauman closed the public hearing. Ms. Hitchcock stated that her concern with the alternate being a property owner is there would be a possibility that a quorum will consist of only property owners and there would not be anyone present with a technical background. There was general discussion regarding the ordinance. Commissioner Stearn motioned to recommend approval of the ordinance with the condition that two of the criteria for historical significance are met and one of the two alternates for the Landmark Commission meet the qualifications of category b and the other alternate meet the qualifications of category a, c or d. 165 ORDINANCE NO. ____________ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, “UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE,” SECTION 2.5.B, “ADMINISTRATOR, POWERS AND DUTIES”, SECTION 2.8, “SUMMARY OF REVIEW AUTHORITY”, SECTION 3.1.F, “GENERAL APPROVAL PROCEDURES, REQUIRED PUBLIC NOTICE”, SECTION 3.2, “ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING),” SECTION 3.9.A, “BUILDING PERMIT, BUILDING PERMIT REQUIRED”, SECTION 4.1, “ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICTS,” AND SECTION 11.2, “DEFINED TERMS,” AND ADDING SECTION 2.4, “LANDMARK COMMISSION”, SECTION 3.9, “CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS”, SECTION 3.10, “CERTIFICATE OF DEMOLITION”, SECTION 5.10, “HISTORIC PRESERVATION OVERLAY DISTRICT”, AND SECTION 10.5, “SPECIFIC PENALTIES FOR CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS AND CERTIFICATES OF DEMOLITION” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS AS SET OUT BELOW; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 2.5.B, “Administrator, Powers and Duties”, Section 2.8, “Summary of Review Authority”, Section 3.1.F, “General Approval Procedures, Required Public Notice”, Section 3.2, “Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning),” Section 3.9.A, “Building Permit, Building Permit Required”, Section 4.1, “Establishment of Districts”, and Section 11.2, “Defined Terms”; and adding Section 2.4, “Landmark Commission”, Section 3.9, “Certificate of Appropriateness”, Section 3.10, “Certificate of Demolition”, Section 5.10, “Historic Preservation Overlay District”, and Section 10.5, “Specific Penalties for Certificates of Appropriateness and Certificates of Demolition” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and made a part of this ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: That if any provisions of any section of this ordinance shall be held to be void or unconstitutional, such holding shall in no way effect the validity of the remaining provi- sions or sections of this ordinance, which shall remain in full force and effect. PART 3: That any person, firm, or corporation violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than Twenty-five Dollars ($25.00) nor more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. Said Ordinance, being a penal ordinance, becomes effective ten (10) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by Section 35 of the Charter of the City of College Station. PASSED, ADOPTED and APPROVED this ___11___ day of _September _, 2008. APPROVED: ____________________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: 166 _______________________________ City Secretary APPROVED: _______________________________ City Attorney 167 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 3 EXHIBIT “A” I. That Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 2.5.B, “Administrator, Powers and Duties” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended by amending Sections 2.5.B.4 and 2.5.B.5 to read as follows: 2.5 Administrator B. Powers and Duties The Administrator shall have the following powers and duties: 4. Final Action The Administrator shall review and take final action on the following: a. Sign permits; b. Site plans (not Wolf Pen Creek District site plans); c. Administrative adjustments; d. Minor and amending plats; e. Determination of building plot (Section 7.1, General Provisions); f. Minor Wolf Pen Creek District projects; g. Amendments to the color palette for Northgate roof colors; h. Certificate of Appropriateness Routine Maintenance Work reviews; and i. Alternative parking plans (Section 7.2, Off-Street Parking). 5. Other Duties a. The Administrator, or his designee, shall serve as the Historic Preservation Officer (HPO) for the City of College Station. As such, the HPO shall serve as a representative for the Landmark Commission and shall be responsible for coordinating the Landmark Commission’s preservation activities with the Historic Preservation Advisory Committee, those of state and federal agencies, and with local, state, and national nonprofit preservation organizations. b. The Administrator shall perform other duties imposed under the provisions of the CITY OF COLLEGE STATION CODE OF ORDINANCES, as amended from time-to-time. 168 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 4 II. That Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 2.8, “Summary of Review Authority” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended by amending Section 2.8, “Summary of Review Authority” to read as follows: 2.8 Summary of Review Authority The following table summarizes the authority of the various review bodies and staff. PROCEDURE CC P&Z ZBA DRB LC Admin. BO DE CITY COUNCIL (CC) Oversize Participation D R Development Agreement D RR R Conditional Use permit D R RR Zoning Map Amendment D R RR Zoning Map Amendment (HP) D R RR PDD / P-MUD Concept Plan D R RR Text Amendment D R RR Comp. Plan Amendment D R RR Impact Fee / CIP Priorities D R PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION (P&Z) Zoning Map Amendment (HP) R R RR Master Plans D RR R Preliminary Plat D RR R Final Plat D RR R Development Plat D RR R Waiver of Subdivision Standard D RR R ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (ZBA) Variance D RR RR RR Administrative Appeal D R Zoning Map Interpretation D R DESIGN REVIEW BOARD (DRB) WPC District Site Plan A D R WPC District Building/Sign Review A D R WPC Parking Waivers A D R NG Waivers D R Non-Residential Arch. Standards Waiver D RR Gateway Grants A D RR LANDMARK COMMISSION (LC) Certificates of Appropriateness A D RR Certificates of Demolition A D RR ADMINISTRATOR Interpretation A** A D Sign Permit A D Site Plan A A* D Administrative Adjustment A D WPC District Building or Sign, Minor A D Minor or Amending Plat A D R 169 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 5 PD Concept Plan Minor Amend. A D NG Roof Color Palette Amendment A D Certificate of Appropriateness, Routine A D Alternative Parking Plans A D R BUILDING OFFICIAL (BO) Building Permit D Certificate of Occupancy R D Certificate of Completion R D R DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER (DE) Development Permit D Driveway Application A D Alternative Const. Material A D *Section 3.5.E. Site Plan Review Criteria and 3.6.E. Wolf Pen Creek Design District General Site Plan Review Criteria only. **Subdivision Regs. only. KEY: A=Appeal R=Recommend D=Final Action/Decision RR=Review/Report Per Ordinance No. 2981 (May 24, 2007) Per Ordinance No. 3007 (September 27, 2007) 170 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 6 III. That Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 3.1.F, “General Approval Procedures, Required Public Notice” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended by amending Sections 3.1.F.1 and 3.1.F.4 to read as follows: 3.1 General Approval Procedures F. Required Public Notice 1. Summary of Notice Required Notice shall be required for development review as shown in the following table. Application Type Published Mailed Agenda Posted Comprehensive Plan Amendment X X Zoning Map Amend. (Rezoning) X X X UDO Text Amendment X X Conditional Use Permit X X X Subdivision - Replats* X* X* X Design District - Site Plan/Bldg. X Certificate of Appropriateness X Certificate of Demolition (No economically viable use) X X X Variances – ZBA X X X Appeals – Site Plan & Driveway X Waiver – Subdivision Design X Waiver – Buffer Requirements X Administrative Appeals X X * Only when required per the Local Government Code. 4. Required Public Hearings The following table illustrates the types of review requiring a public hearing and the review body responsible for conducting the hearing. Application Type Zoning Board of Adjustment Landmark Commission Planning and Zoning Commission City Council Comprehensive Plan Amendment X X Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning) X X Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning— Historic Preservation Overlay District) X X X Certificate of Demolition (No economically viable use) X UDO Text Amendment X X Conditional Use Permit X X Subdivision* X Variances – ZBA X Administrative Appeals X * Only when required per the LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE. 171 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 7 IV. That Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 3.2, “Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning)” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended by amending Section 3.2, “Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning)” to read as follows: 3.2 Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning) A. Purpose To establish and maintain sound, stable, and desirable development within the territorial limits of the City, the Official Zoning Map may be amended based upon changed or changing conditions in a particular area or in the City generally, or to rezone an area or extend the boundary of an existing zoning district. All amendments shall be in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan, which may be amended according to the procedure in Section 3.19, Comprehensive Plan Amendment. B. Initiation of Amendments An amendment to the Official Zoning Map may be initiated by: 1. City Council on its own motion; 2. The Planning and Zoning Commission; 3. The Administrator; or 4. The property owner(s). C. Amendment Application A complete application for a zoning map amendment shall be submitted to the Administrator as set forth in Section 3.1.C, Application Forms and Fees. 1. Application requests for a Planned Development District (PDD) and Planned Mixed-Use District (P-MUD) shall provide the following additional information: a. A written statement of the purpose and intent of the proposed development; b. A list and explanation of the potential land uses permitted; and c. A concept plan as described in Section 3.4, Concept Plan Review (PDD and P-MUD Districts). Per Ordinance No. 2981 (May 24, 2007) 2. Application requests for a Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay District (NPO) shall provide the following additional information: a. An original plat of the subdivision; and b. A petition including dated signatures by sixty percent (60%) of current property owners in the subdivision in support of the overlay; and c. Contact information for all Neighborhood Association or Homeowners Association committee members. 3. Application requests for a Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (NCO) shall provide the following additional information: a. An original plat of the subdivision; b. A petition including dated signatures by sixty percent (60%) of the property owners in the subdivision in support of the overlay; c. Contact information for all Neighborhood Association or Homeowners Association committee members; d. A list of six (6) property owners in the neighborhood to serve on neighborhood stakeholder committee; and 172 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 8 e. A checklist of the proposed items to be included in the Conservation Study. 4. Application requests for a Historic Preservation Overlay District shall provide the following additional information: a. An inventory and survey of structures to be included in the rezoning, submitted on a form provided by the Historic Preservation Officer; b. A current photograph of each property included in the rezoning, and its improvements; c. Historical photographs, where available; and d. A completed Designation Report. Upon initiation of the historic designation procedure, the Historic Preservation Officer shall coordinate research to compile a written report regarding the historical, cultural, and architectural significance of the place or area proposed for historic designation at the request of the applicant, but the rezoning application will not be considered complete until the report has been completed. A Designation Report shall include a statement on each of the following to the extent that they apply: 1) A listing of the architectural, archaeological, paleontological, cultural, economic, social, ethnic, political, or historical characteristics upon which the nomination is based; 2) A description of the historical, cultural and architectural significance of the structures and sites; 3) Identification of contributing and noncontributing resources to the proposed district; and 4) A description of the boundaries of the proposed Historic Preservation Overlay District, including subareas and areas where new construction will be prohibited. D. Approval Process 1. Preapplication Conference Prior to the submission of an application for a Zoning Map Amendment, all potential applicants shall request a Preapplication Conference with the Administrator. The purpose of the conference is to respond to any questions that the applicant may have regarding any application procedures, standards, or regulations required by this UDO. If the Administrator determines that the map amendment request is not in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan, he shall not accept the application for the map amendment, and no further processing shall occur until the map amendment is in conformity or a request for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan eliminating the lack of conformity has been submitted by the applicant. 2. Neighborhood Meeting Prior to the submission of an application for a Zoning Map Amendment for a NPO or NCO Overlay Rezoning, all potential applicants shall request a Neighborhood Meeting with City Staff. Prior to the submission of an application for a Zoning Map Amendment for a Historic Preservation Overlay District rezoning, all potential applicants shall request a Neighborhood Meeting with the Historic Preservation Officer. The purpose of the meeting is to present information about the proposed overlay and explain the process of rezoning to the neighborhood. 3. Review and Report by Administrator 173 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 9 With the exception of applications for Historic Preservation Overlay Districts, once the application is complete, the Administrator shall review the proposed amendment to the Official Zoning Map in light of the Comprehensive Plan, subject to the criteria enumerated in Article 4, Zoning Districts, and give a report to the Planning and Zoning Commission on the date of the scheduled public hearing. 4. Review and Report by Historic Preservation Officer An application for a Historic Preservation Overlay District rezoning shall be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Officer, who shall review the proposed amendment in light of the Comprehensive Plan, subject to the criteria enumerated in Article 4, Zoning Districts, and Section 5.10 Historic Preservation Overlay District, and give a report to the Landmark Commission on the date of the scheduled public hearing. 5. Referral To Landmark Commission The Historic Preservation Officer, upon receipt of an application to amend the Official Zoning Map to an Historic Preservation Overlay District, shall refer the same to the Landmark Commission for study, hearing, and report. The Planning and Zoning Commission may not hold a public hearing or make a report to the City Council until it has received a report from the Landmark Commission. 6. Recommendation by Landmark Commission The Landmark Commission shall publish, post, and mail public notice in accordance with Section 3.1.F, Required Public Notice. The Landmark Commission shall hold a public hearing and make a recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Commission. 7. Referral To Planning and Zoning Commission With the exception of applications for Historic Preservation Overlay Districts, the Administrator, upon receipt of an application to amend the Official Zoning Map, shall refer the same to the Commission for study, hearing, and report. For a an application to amend the Official Zoning Map to an Historic Preservation Overlay District, the Historic Preservation Officer shall refer the same to the Planning and Zoning Commission for study, hearing, and report with the report of the Landmark Commission. The City Council may not enact the proposed amendment until the Planning and Zoning Commission makes its report to the City Council. 8. Recommendation by Planning and Zoning Commission The Planning and Zoning Commission shall publish, post, and mail public notice in accordance with Section 3.1.F, Required Public Notice. The Commission shall hold a public hearing and recommend to the City Council such action as the Commission deems proper. 9. City Council Action a. Notice The City Council shall publish, post, and mail public notice in accordance with Section 3.1.F, Required Public Notice, and hold a public hearing before taking final action on an application to amend the Official Zoning Map. b. Public Hearing The City Council shall hold a public hearing and approve, approve with modifications, or disapprove the application to amend the Official Zoning Map. c. Effect of Protest to Proposed Amendment If a proposed change to this UDO or rezoning is protested in accordance with Chapter 211 of the Texas Local Government Code, the proposed change must receive, in order to take effect, the affirmative vote of at least three-fourths of all members of the City Council. The protest must be written and signed by the owners of at least 20 percent of either the area of lots covered by the proposed change, or of the area of the lots or land immediately adjoining the area covered by the proposed change and extending 200 feet from that area. 174 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 10 d. Review Criteria In determining whether to approve, approve with modifications, or disapprove the proposed Official Zoning Map amendment, the City Council shall consider the following matters regarding the proposed amendment: 1) Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan; 2) Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood; 3) Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment; 4) Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment; 5) Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment; and 6) Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for the proposed use. 7) In addition, for proposed amendments to Historic Preservation Overlay Districts, the City Council shall consider if the proposed amendment contains property(ies) and an environmental setting which meets two or more of the criteria for designation of a Historic Preservation Overlay District as described in Section 5.10.C Criteria for Designation of Historic Preservation Overlay Districts. e. Effect of Historic Preservation Overlay District Zoning Upon Official Public Records Upon designation of a property with a Historic Preservation Overlay District, the City Council shall cause the designation to be recorded in the Official Public Records of Real Property of Brazos County, Texas, the tax records of the City of College Station, and the Brazos County Appraisal District, as well as the official zoning map of the City of College Station. E. Limitation on Reapplication If an application for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for reclassification of the same property or any portion thereof shall not be considered within a period of 180 days from the date of denial, unless the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that one of the following factors are applicable: 1. There is a substantial change in circumstances relevant to the issues and/or facts considered during review of the application that might reasonably affect the decision- making body’s application of the relevant review standards to the development proposed in the application; 2. New or additional information is available that was not available at the time of the review that might reasonably affect the decision-making body’s application of the relevant review standards to the development proposed; 3. A new application is proposed to be submitted that is materially different from the prior application (e.g., proposes new uses or a substantial decrease in proposed densities and intensities); or 4. The final decision on the application was based on a material mistake of fact F. Repeal of a Single-Family Overlay District A repeal of a single-family overlay district may be initiated by: 1. City Council on its own motion; 2. The Planning and Zoning Commission; 3. The Administrator; or 4. By petition of sixty percent (60%) of the property owner(s) in the subject district. 175 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 11 A repeal of a single-family overlay district is considered a rezoning and is subject to the Zoning Map Amendment requirements herein. 176 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 12 V. That Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 3.9.A, “Building Permit, Building Permit Required” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended by amending Section 3.9.A, “Building Permit, Building Permit Required” to read as follows: 3.9 Building Permit A. Building Permit Required No building or other structure shall hereafter be erected, moved, added to, structurally altered, repaired, demolished, or occupancy changed without a permit issued by the Building Official except in conformity with the provisions of this section and the 2006 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE as adopted and amended by the City, unless otherwise provided for in the CITY OF COLLEGE STATION CODE OF ORDINANCES. No Building Permit issued under the provisions of this Article for land use or construction in the City shall be considered valid unless signed by the Building Official. Staff Review Application Submittal Building Official Completeness Review 177 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 13 VI. That Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 4.1, “Establishment of Districts,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended by amending Section 4.1, “Establishment of Districts,” to read as follows: 4.1 Establishment of Districts For the purpose of this UDO, portions of the City, as specified on the Official Zoning Map of the City, are hereby divided into the zoning, design, and overlay districts enumerated below. The intensity regulations applicable for such zoning districts are designated in Article 5 and the use regulations are designated in Article 6 of this UDO. Residential Zoning Districts A-O Agricultural-Open A-OR Rural Residential Subdivision R-1 Single-Family Residential R-1B Single-Family Residential R-2 Duplex Residential R-3 Townhouse R-4 Multi-Family R-6 High Density Multi-Family R-7 Manufactured Home Park Non-Residential Zoning Districts A-P Administrative / Professional C-1 General Commercial C-2 Commercial-Industrial C-3 Light Commercial M-1 Light Industrial M-2 Heavy Industrial C-U College and University R & D Research & Development Planned Districts P-MUD Planned Mixed-Use District PDD Planned Development District Design Districts WPC Wolf Pen Creek Development Corridor NG-1 Core Northgate NG-2 Transitional Northgate Northgate NG-3 Residential Northgate Overlay Districts OV Corridor Overlay RDD Redevelopment District KO Krenek Tap Overlay NPO Neighborhood Prevailing Overlay NCO Neighborhood Conservation Overlay HP Historic Preservation Overlay 178 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 14 VII. That Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 11.2, “Defined Terms,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended by amending Section 11.2, “Defined Terms,” to add the following definitions: 11.2 Defined Terms For the purpose of this UDO, certain words as used herein are defined as follows: Historic Preservation Easement: An easement that protects a significant historic, archaeological, or cultural resource. It provides assurance that a property’s intrinsic values will be preserved through future ownership. A building, portion of a building (such as the façade), or a bridge, dam, or any other kind of structure may qualify. A Historic Preservation Easement may also protect a historic landscape, battlefield, traditional cultural place, or archaeological site. Historic Preservation Overlay District definitions (applicable only in reference to Historic Preservation Overlay district): Association: Link of a property that contributes to a Historic Preservation Overlay District with a historic event, activity, or person. Also, the quality of integrity through which a property is linked to a particular past time and place. Contributing Resource: A building, site, structure or object in a Historic Preservation Overlay District that supports the District’s historical significance through Location, Design, Setting, Materials, Workmanship, Feeling, or Association. Design: Quality of integrity applying to the elements that create the physical form, plan, space, structure, and style of a property. Feeling: Quality of integrity through which a property that contributes to a Historic Preservation Overlay District evokes the aesthetic or historic sense of past time and place. Integrity: Authenticity of a property’s historic identity, evidenced by the survival of physical characteristics that existed during the property’s historic or prehistoric period. Location: Quality of integrity retained by a property that contributes to a Historic Preservation Overlay District historic property existing in the same place as it did during the period of significance. Materials: Quality of integrity applying to the physical elements that were combined or deposited in a particular pattern or configuration to form a property that contributes to a Historic Preservation Overlay District. Non-Contributing Resource: A building, site, structure, or object in a Historic Preservation Overlay District that does not support the District’s historical significance through Location, Design, Setting, Materials, Workmanship, Feeling, or Association. Setting: Quality of integrity applying to the physical environment of a property that contributes to a Historic Preservation Overlay District. Workmanship: Quality of integrity applying to the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture, people, or artisan. 179 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 15 VIII. That Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 2, “Development Review Bodies,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended by adding Section 2.4, “Landmark Commission” (which will result in the renumbering of the existing Sections 2.4 – 2.8 to Section 2.5 – 2.9) to read as follows: 2.4 Landmark Commission A. Creation A Landmark Commission is hereby established by the City of College Station for the purpose of enhancing the City’s ability to identify and protect historically and/or culturally significant districts, areas, sites, buildings, and structures by bringing expertise from the community in those areas related to the designation of Historic Preservation Overlay Districts and protection of the contributing elements within them. B. Membership and Terms 1. The Landmark Commission shall consist of seven (7) regular members and two (2) alternate members. Six (6) of the regular members and the two (2) alternate members shall be appointed by the City Council. City Council shall apportion membership according to the following fields of expertise or specialized knowledge: a. One (1) member shall represent one of the following fields or professions: 1) History or 2) Archaeology b. Two (2) members shall be the owners of the following: 1) Property in the City of College Station Historic Marker Program or 2) Property within a Historic Preservation Overlay District. If no Historic Preservation Overlay District has yet been applied to property in the City of College Station, a property owner(s) of land platted prior to 1970 may be considered. c. Two (2) members shall represent any combination of the following fields or professions: 1) Architecture: an architect, previously registered architect, architect registered in another state, or professor in the field of architecture; 2) Landscape architecture: a landscape architect, previously registered landscape architect, landscape architect registered in another state, or professor in the field of landscape architecture; 3) Urban planning: a certified planner, previously certified planner, a planner with at least three (3) years of municipal planning experience, or professor in the field of urban planning; or 4) Historical preservation specialist: an experienced professional who provides technical and strategic expertise to promote the viability, reuse, and integrity of historic buildings and/or property. d. One (1) member shall represent one of the following fields or professions: 1) Banking, finance, or economics; 2) Real estate; or 3) Law. 180 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 16 e. One (1) alternate shall represent the membership criteria identified above in subsection b. f. One (1) alternate shall represent any of the fields identified above in subsections a, c, or d. The seventh regular member shall be the Chairman of the Historic Preservation Advisory Committee or his designee. The City Council shall prioritize Landmark Commission candidates within each subsection above by their demonstrated expertise and interest in historic preservation. In the event any of the memberships assigned to a particular field of expertise or specialized knowledge identified above in subsections a, b, c, or d cannot be timely filled (in the judgment of the City Council) with a qualified candidate, the City Council may appoint citizens-at-large that have demonstrated interest in historic preservation to fill such places. 2. Members shall be appointed for three-year terms or until their successors are appointed. Initially, one (1) member from subsection b and one (1) member from subsection c shall have terms of only one (1) year; the members of subsections a and d shall have terms of only two (2) years; and one member from subsection b and one member from subsection c shall have terms of three (3) years. After the initial appointments, two (2) members shall be appointed each year. 3. The Landmark Commission shall comply with the OPEN MEETINGS ACT. C. Officers, Meetings, Quorum 1. Officers A Chairperson shall be appointed annually by the City Council. The Commission shall select a Vice-Chair from among its members, as needed. 2. Meetings Members of the Landmark Commission shall meet monthly, as needed, and the Chairperson shall designate the time and place of such meetings. All meetings of the Commission where a quorum is present shall be open to the public. 3. Quorum Four (4) members shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of any business. Any recommendation or decision which does not receive a majority of positive votes shall be deemed a negative report. 4. Rules of Proceeding The Landmark Commission shall adopt its own rules of procedure. 5. Minutes The Landmark Commission shall keep minutes of its proceedings, showing the vote, indicating such fact, and shall keep records of its examinations and other official actions, all of which shall be immediately filed in the office of the Administrator and shall be a public record. D. Powers and Duties The Landmark Commission shall have the following powers and duties: 1. Duties a. Review and approve surveys conducted and maintained by the City that include an inventory of significant historic, architectural, and cultural resources within the City of College Station according to guidelines established by the Texas Historical Commission; 181 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 17 b. Utilize such surveys to identify potential property appropriate for the application of Historic Preservation Overlays; c. Review and approve surveys conducted and maintained by the City that include an inventory of all properties located within a Historic Preservation Overlay District within the City of College Station; d. Nominate properties to the National Register of Historic Places; e. Establish an ad hoc three-person Economic Review Panel when a property owner in a Historic Preservation Overlay District requests a Certificate of Demolition based on the reason that no economically viable use of the property exists. The Economic Review Panel must be comprised of three independent experts knowledgeable in one or more of the following fields: the economics of real estate, building renovation, or redevelopment. “Independent” as used in this subparagraph means that the expert has no financial interest in the property, its renovation, or redevelopment; is not an employee of the property owner; is not a city employee; is not a member of the Landmark Commission; and is not compensated for serving on the Economic Review Panel. The Economic Review Panel must consist of one person selected by the Landmark Commission, one person selected by the property owner, and one person selected by the first two appointees. If the first two appointees cannot agree on a third appointee within thirty (30) calendar days after submission of all of the required documentation supporting the application, the third appointee will be selected by the Administrator within five (5) days. Within thirty-five (35) calendar days after submission of all of the required documentation supporting the application, all appointments to the Economic Review Panel shall be made; f. Act in an advisory role to the City Council of the City of College Station, all appointed boards and commissions, and City departments regarding the protection of local historic, architectural, and cultural resources; g. Review and make recommendations to the appropriate County Historical Commission of all proposed National Register nominations for properties within the City of College Station; and h. Prepare and submit annually to the City Council a report summarizing the work completed during the previous year. 2. Recommendations The Landmark Commission shall make recommendations to the Planning and Zoning Commission subject to the terms and conditions set forth for such uses in this UDO for the following: a. The effective coordination of the various City departments, committees, and boards, in implementing the Comprehensive Plan as it relates to historic preservation; b. The adoption of text amendments as they relate to the designation of Historic Preservation Overlay Districts and the processes and standards for properties within Historic Preservation Overlay Districts; and c. The designation of Historic Preservation Overlay Districts. The Landmark Commission shall make recommendations to the City Council for the following: d. The utilization of state, federal, or private funds to promote the preservation of Historic Preservation Overlay Districts within the City of College Station, and e. The acceptance of the dedication of Historic Preservation Easements for the purpose of historic preservation. 3. Final Action The Landmark Commission shall hear and take final action on the following: a. Applications for Certificates of Appropriateness, b. Applications for Certificates of Demolition, and 182 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 18 c. Certifications of properties of Demolition by Neglect, notices to owners of certified Demolition by Neglect properties, and referrals for enforcement. E. Staff The Administrator shall provide staff, including a Historic Preservation Officer, as needed, to the Landmark Commission. 183 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 19 IX. That Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 3, “Development Review Procedures”, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended by adding Section 3.9, “Certificate of Appropriateness” and Section 3.10, “Certificate of Demolition” (which will result in the renumbering of the existing Sections 3.9 – 3.19 to Section 3.11 – 3.21) to read as follows: 3.9 Certificate of Appropriateness A. Applicability 1. Prior to any construction, reconstruction, alteration, restoration, or rehabilitation of any structure or any property within a Historic Preservation Overlay District, or any material change in the light fixtures, signs, sidewalks, fences, steps, paving, or other exterior elements visible from a public right-of-way that affects the appearance and cohesiveness of any structure or any property within a Historic Preservation Overlay District, an applicant must obtain a Certificate of Appropriateness in accordance with this Section. 2. No building permit shall be issued for proposed work within a Historic Preservation Overlay District until a Certificate of Appropriateness has first been issued as required by the UDO. The Certificate of Appropriateness shall be in addition to and not in lieu of any building permit that may be required by any other ordinance of the City of College Station. B. Application Requirements A complete application for a Certificate of Appropriateness shall be submitted to the Administrator as set forth in Section 3.1.C., Application Forms and Fees. The application shall include, where applicable: 1. Detailed description of proposed work; 2. Proposed building plans (this will not constitute a building plan submittal for review for a building permit); 3. Landscaping plans showing landscaping features and vegetation species, sizes, and locations; 4. Landscape protection plans; 5. Location and photographs of the property and adjacent properties; 6. Elevation drawings of the proposed changes, if available; 7. Samples of materials to be used; 8. Specifications for architectural features and materials; and 9. Any other information that the Landmark Commission or Historic Preservation Officer may deem necessary in order to visualize proposed work. C. Certificate of Appropriateness Approval Process Certificate of Appropriateness applications shall be processed in accordance with the following requirements: 1. Preapplication Conference Prior to the submission of an application for Certificate of Appropriateness, all potential applicants may request a preapplication conference with the Administrator. The purpose of the preapplication conference is to respond to any questions that the applicant may have regarding any application procedures, standards, or regulations required by this Staff Review Application Submittal Landmark Commission Completeness Review 184 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 20 UDO; however, the preapplication conference does not fulfill the requirements for formal review or submittal as set forth in this UDO. 2. Review and Report by the Historic Preservation Officer Upon receipt of an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness, the Historic Preservation Officer shall determine whether the application is to be reviewed under the Standard Certificate of Appropriateness Review Procedure or the Routine Maintenance Work Procedure. If the application is to be reviewed under the Standard Certificate of Appropriateness Review Procedure, the following applies. If the application is to be reviewed under the Routine Maintenance Work Procedure, the procedure in subsection E. below will apply. Under the Standard Certificate of Appropriateness Review Procedure, the Historic Preservation Officer will review the application to determine if the proposed plan is consistent with all applicable provisions of this UDO and the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The Historic Preservation Officer will forward his report on the application to the Landmark Commission with a recommendation for approval, denial or conditional approval. 3. Review by the Landmark Commission The Landmark Commission shall review the application in a public meeting and may approve, approve with conditions or deny the application. If the Landmark Commission requires additional information than that presented at a meeting, a decision may be postponed until a specified date when the specified information may be provided. Notice shall be provided by publication of the agenda of the meeting. 4. Final Action by the Landmark Commission If the application is determined to be consistent with all applicable provisions of this UDO, including the applicable district provisions of Section 5.10 Historic Preservation Overlay District and the review criteria below, the Landmark Commission shall approve the plan. A determination that all requirements and provisions have not been satisfied shall result in disapproval of the plan. D. Criteria for Approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness The Landmark Commission shall approve a Certificate of Appropriateness if it finds: 1. For Contributing Resources: a. The proposed work is consistent with any adopted design guidelines for the district, The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation, The Secretary of the Interior’s Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings, Preservation Briefs, and all related interpretative documents published by the US Department of Interior; b. The proposed work will not have an adverse effect on the architectural features of the structure; c. The proposed work will not have an adverse effect on the Historic Preservation Overlay district; and d. The proposed work will not have an adverse effect on the future preservation, maintenance, and use of the structure or the Historic Preservation Overlay District. 2. For Non-Contributing Resources: the proposed work is compatible with the Historic Preservation Overlay District. E. Certificate of Appropriateness Routine Maintenance Work Review Procedure 1. If, upon review of an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness, the Historic Preservation Officer determines that an applicant is seeking a Certificate of Appropriateness to authorize only routine maintenance work, the Historic Preservation Officer shall review the Certificate of Appropriateness application to determine whether the proposed work complies with the regulations contained in this Section and approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application. The Historic Preservation Officer may also forward the application to the Landmark Commission for any reason. 2. Routine Maintenance Work on a property is considered to be: 185 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 21 a. The installation of a chimney located on an accessory building, or on the rear fifty percent (50%) of a main building and not part of a corner side façade; b. The installation of an awning located on an accessory building, or on the rear façade of a primary structure; c. The installation of a wood or chain link fence that is not painted or stained; e. The installation of gutters and downspouts of a color that matches or compliments the dominant trim or roof color; f. The installation of skylights and solar panels; g. The installation of storm windows and doors; j. The restoration of original architectural elements; 3. The applicant may appeal the Historic Preservation Officer’s decision by submitting to the Historic Preservation Officer a written request for appeal within ten (10) calendar days of the decision. Upon the written request for appeal, the Landmark Commission will review the application under the Standard Certificate of Appropriateness Review Procedure. F. Expiration of Approval 1. For plans that do not require the issuance of a building permit, work to complete the plans shall commence and be completed within twenty-four (24) months from the date of approval of the application. The Historic Preservation Officer may authorize a single extension of a Certification of Appropriateness up to six (6) months upon demonstration of substantial progress and the lack of changed or changing conditions in the area. 2. For plans that require the issuance of a building permit, if a building permit has not been issued for the proposed work within twenty-four (24) months from the date of approval of the application, the Historic Preservation Officer may authorize a single extension of a Certification of Appropriateness up to six (6) months upon demonstration of the lack of changed or changing conditions in the area. A Certification of Appropriateness shall be valid as long as there is a valid building permit. G. Appeals An applicant for a Certification of Appropriateness dissatisfied with the action of the Landmark Commission related to the issuance or denial of a Certification of Appropriateness shall have the right to appeal to the City Council within ten (10) calendar days after the date of such action. In considering an appeal, the City Council shall consider the same standards and evidence that the Landmark Commission was required to consider in making the decision. H. Limitation on Reapplication If a final decision is reached denying a Certificate of Appropriateness, no further applications may be considered for the subject matter of the denied Certificate of Appropriateness for one (1) year from the date of the final decision unlessthe Landmark Commission waives the time limitation because the Landmark Commission finds that there are changed circumstances sufficient to warrant a new hearing. I. Revocation The Historic Preservation Officer may, in writing, revoke a Certificate of Appropriateness if: 1. The Certificate of Appropriateness was issued on the basis of incorrect information supplied by the applicant, or 2. The work is not performed in accordance with the Certificate of Appropriateness. J. Amendment to a Certificate of Appropriateness A Certificate of Appropriateness may be amended by submitting a new Certificate of Appropriateness application to the Historic Preservation Officer. The application shall then be subject to either the Standard Certificate of Appropriateness Review Procedure or the Routine Maintenance Work Procedure. 186 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 22 K. Ordinary Maintenance Other than the Routine Maintenance Work listed above, a Certificate of Appropriateness shall not be required for the ordinary maintenance and repair of any exterior architectural feature of a property within a Historic Preservation Overlay District which does not involve a change in design, material, or outward appearance such as: 1. The replacement of a roof of the same or an original material that does not include a change in color; 2. The application of paint that is the same as the existing; 3. Minor repair using the same material and design as the original; 4. The repair of sidewalks and driveways using the same type and color of materials; 5. The process of cleaning (including but not limited to low-pressure water blasting and stripping, but excluding sandblasting and high-pressure water blasting); and 6. The painting, replacing, duplicating, or stabilizing deteriorated or damaged non-original architectural features (including but not limited to roofing, windows, columns, and siding) in order to maintain the structure and to slow deterioration. F. Temporary Emergency Repairs If the Building Official determines that a building or structure in a Historic Preservation Overlay District poses an immediate threat to persons or property, the Building Official may take any action authorized under the CITY OF COLLEGE STATION CODE OF ORDINANCES to make the building or structure safe without the requirement of a Certification of Appropriateness. The Building Official shall send a written report of such actions to the Landmark Commission. 3.10 Certificate of Demolition A. Applicability 1. Prior to any demolition or removal of any structure or portion thereof on any property within a Historic Preservation Overlay District, an applicant must obtain a Certificate of Demolition in accordance with this Section. 2. No building permit shall be issued for proposed work within a Historic Preservation Overlay District until a Certificate of Demolition required by the UDO has first been issued by the Landmark Commission. The Certificate of Demolition shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, any building permit that may be required by any other ordinance of the City of College Station. 3. No permit for the demolition of a structure or property within a Historic Preservation Overlay District, including secondary buildings and landscape features, shall be granted by the Building Official without the review of a completed application for and approval of a Certificate of Demolition by the Landmark Commission. B. Application Requirements A property owner seeking demolition or removal of a structure, including secondary buildings and landscape features, on a property in a Historic Preservation Overlay District shall submit a complete application for a Certificate of Demolition to the Administrator as set forth in Section 3.1.C., Application Forms and Fees. The application shall include: 1. An affidavit in which the owner swears or affirms that all information submitted in the application is true and correct. 2. An indication that the demolition or removal is sought for one or more of the following reasons: Staff Review Application Submittal Landmark Commission Completeness Review Economic Review Panel (when necessary) 187 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 23 a. To replace the structure with a new structure that is more appropriate and compatible with the Historic Preservation Overlay District; b. No economically viable use of the property exists; c. The structure poses an imminent threat to public health or safety; or d. The structure is noncontributing to the Historic Preservation Overlay District because it is newer than the period of historic significance. 3. An application “To replace the structure with a new structure that is more appropriate and compatible with the Historic Preservation Overlay District” shall also include: a. Records depicting the original construction of the structure, including drawings, pictures, or written descriptions where available; b. Records depicting the current condition of the structure, including drawings, pictures, or written descriptions; c. Any conditions proposed to be placed voluntarily on the new structure that would mitigate the loss of the structure; d. Complete architectural drawings of the new structure; and e. A guarantee agreement between the owner and the City that demonstrates the owner’s intent and financial ability to construct the new structure. The guarantee must: 1) Contain a statement of intent to construct the proposed structure by a specific date in accordance with architectural drawings approved by the City through the Certificate of Appropriateness process; 2) Require the owner or construction contractor to post a performance and payment bond, letter of credit, escrow agreement, cash deposit, or other arrangement acceptable to the Administrator to ensure construction of the new structure; and 3) Be approved as to form by the City Attorney. 4. An application that “No economically viable use of the property exists” shall also include: a. The past and current uses of the structure and property; b. The name of the owner. 1) If the owner is a legal entity, the type of entity and states in which it is registered. 2) The date and price of purchase or other acquisition of the structure and property, and the party from whom acquired, and the owner’s current basis in the property. 3) The relationship, if any, between the owner and the party from whom the structure and property were acquired. (If one or both parties to the transaction were legal entities, any relationships between the officers and the board of directors of the entities must be specified.); 4) The assessed value of the structure and property according to the two most recent tax assessments; 5) The amount of real estate taxes on the structure and property for the previous two (2) years; 6) The current fair market value of the structure and property as determined by an independent licensed appraiser; 7) All appraisals obtained by the owner and prospective purchasers within the previous two (2) years in connection with the potential or actual purchase, financing, or ownership of the structure and property; 8) All listings of the structure and property for sale or rent within the previous two (2) years, prices asked, and offers received; 9) A profit and loss statement for the property and structure containing the annual gross income for the previous two (2) years; itemized expenses (including operating and maintenance costs) for the previous two (2) years, including proof that adequate and competent management procedures were followed; the annual cash flow for the previous two (2) years; and proof that the owner 188 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 24 has made reasonable efforts to obtain a reasonable rate of return on the owner's investment and labor; 10) A mortgage history of the property during the previous five (5) years, including the principal balances and interest rates on the mortgages and the annual debt services on the structure and property; 11) All capital expenditures during the current ownership; 12) Records depicting the current conditions of the structure and property, including drawings, pictures, or written descriptions; 13) A study of restoration of the structure or property, performed by a licensed architect, engineer or financial analyst, analyzing the physical feasibility (including architectural and engineering analyses) and financial feasibility (including pro forma profit and loss statements for a ten (10) year period, taking into consideration redevelopment options and all incentives available) of adaptive use of restoration of the structure and property; 14) Any consideration given by the owner to profitable adaptive uses for the structure and property; 15) Construction plans for any proposed development or adaptive reuse, including site plans, floor plans, and elevations; 16) Any conditions proposed to be placed voluntarily on new development that would mitigate the loss of the structure; and 17) Any other evidence that shows that the affirmative obligation to maintain the structure or property makes it impossible to realize a reasonable rate of return. 5. An application to demolish or remove a structure that “Poses an imminent threat to public health or safety” shall also include: a. Records depicting the current condition of the structure, including drawings, pictures, or written descriptions; b. A study regarding the nature, imminence, and severity of the threat, as performed by a licensed architect or engineer; and c. A study regarding both the cost of restoration of the structure and the feasibility (including architectural and engineering analyses) of restoration of the structure, as performed by a licensed architect or engineer. 6. An application to demolish or remove a structure that is “Noncontributing to the Historic Preservation Overlay District because the structure is newer than the period of historic significance” shall also provide: a. Documentation that the structure is noncontributing to the Historic Preservation Overlay District; b. Documentation of the age of the structure; and c. A statement of the purpose of the demolition. 7. Any other evidence the property owner wishes to submit in support of the application. 8. Any other evidence requested by the Landmark Commission or the Historic Preservation Officer. C. Certificate of Demolition Approval Process Certificate of Demolition applications shall be processed in accordance with the following requirements: 1. Preapplication Conference Prior to the submission of an application for Certificate of Demolition, all potential applicants may request a preapplication conference with the Administrator. The purpose of the preapplication conference is to respond to any questions that the applicant may have regarding any application procedures, standards, or regulations required by this UDO; however, the preapplication conference does not fulfill the requirements for formal review or submittal as set forth in this UDO. 189 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 25 2. Application When a complete application for a Certificate of Demolition has been submitted to the City, the application will begin a mandatory sixty (60) day stay of demolition. The Certificate of Demolition approval process will continue concurrently with the stay of demolition, but the Landmark Commission shall not take final action before the stay of demolition has expired. 3. Review and Report by the Historic Preservation Officer If the application is determined to be consistent with all applicable provisions of this UDO and the City’s Comprehensive Plan, or if the application is recommended for denial or conditional approval, the Historic Preservation Officer shall report such consistency, inconsistency, or proposed conditions to the Landmark Commission. 4. Review by an Economic Review Panel For an application that “No economically viable use of the property exists”, within thirty- five (35) days after appointment of the Economic Review Panel as provided in Section 2.4, the Economic Review Panel shall review the submitted documentation; hold a public hearing; consider all options for renovation, adaptive reuse, and redevelopment; and forward a written recommendation to the Landmark Commission. The Historic Preservation Officer shall provide administrative support to the Economic Review Panel. The Economic Review Panel’s recommendation shall be based on the same standard for approval to be used by the Landmark Commission. An application that no economically viable use of the property exists will not be considered complete until the Economic Review Panel has made its recommendation to the Landmark Commission. If the Economic Review Panel is unable to reach a consensus, the report will indicate the majority and minority recommendations. If the Economic Review Panel does not meet within thirty-five (35) days after appointment, a recommendation of no economically viable use of the property will be forwarded to the Landmark Commission. 5. Review by the Landmark Commission The Landmark Commission shall review the application for Certificate of Demolition in a public meeting and may approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application. If the Landmark Commission requires additional information than that presented at a meeting, a decision may be postponed until a specified date when the specified information may be provided. Notice shall be provided by publication of the agenda of the meeting. 6. Final Action by the Landmark Commission If the application is determined to be consistent with all applicable provisions of this UDO, including the applicable district provisions of Section 5.10 Historic Preservation Overlay District, and the review criteria below, the Landmark Commission shall approve the plan. A determination that all such requirements and provision have not been satisfied shall result in disapproval of the plan. The property owner has the burden of proof to establish by clear and convincing evidence the necessary facts to warrant favorable action by the Landmark Commission. D. Criteria for Approval of a Certificate of Demolition In considering an application for a Certificate of Demolition, the Landmark Commission shall deny the application unless it makes the following findings: 1. The Landmark Commission shall deny an application for a Certificate of Demolition to replace a structure with a new structure unless it finds that: a. The new structure is more appropriate and compatible with the Historic Preservation Overlay District than the structure to be demolished or removed; and b. The owner has the financial ability and intent to build the new structure. The Landmark Commission must first approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the proposed new structure and the guarantee agreement to construct the new structure before it may consider the application for a Certificate of Demolition. 190 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 26 2. The Landmark Commission shall deny an application for a Certificate of Demolition to remove a structure because of no economically viable use of the property unless it finds that: a. The structure is incapable of earning a reasonable economic return unless the demolition or removal is allowed (a reasonable economic return does not have to be the most profitable return possible); b. The structure cannot be adapted for any other use, whether by the owner or by a purchaser, which would result in a reasonable economic return; and c. The owner has failed during the last two (2) years to find a developer, financier, purchaser, or tenant that would enable the owner to realize a reasonable economic return, despite having made substantial ongoing efforts to do so. 3. The Landmark Commission shall deny an application for a Certificate of Demolition to remove a structure that poses an imminent threat to public health or safety unless it finds that: a. The structure constitutes a documented major and imminent threat to public health and safety; b. The demolition or removal is required to alleviate the threat to public health and safety; and c. There is no reasonable way, other than demolition or removal, to eliminate the threat in a timely manner. 4. The Landmark Commission shall deny an application for a Certificate of Demolition to remove a structure that is noncontributing to the Historic Preservation Overlay District because it is newer than the period of historic significance unless it finds that: a. The structure is noncontributing to the Historic Preservation Overlay District; b. The structure is newer than the period of historic significance for the Historic Preservation Overlay District; and c. Demolition of the structure will not adversely affect the historic character of the property or the integrity of the Historic Preservation Overlay District. E. Appeals 1. Any interested person may appeal the decision of the Landmark Commission to the City Council by filing a written notice with the Administrator within ten (10) calendar days after the decision of the Landmark Commission. If no appeal is made of a decision to approve a Certificate of Demolition within the 10-day period, the Building Official shall issue the permit to allow demolition or removal. If an appeal is filed, the City Council shall hear and decide the appeal within sixty-five (65) calendars days of its filing. 2. In considering an appeal, the City Council shall consider the same standards and evidence that the Landmark Commission was required to consider in making the decision. F. Limitation on Reapplication If a final decision is reached denying a Certificate of Demolition, no further applications may be considered for the subject matter of the denied Certificate of Demolition for one (1) year from the date of the final decision unless the Landmark Commission waives the time limitation because the Landmark Commission finds that there are changed circumstances sufficient to warrant a new hearing. G. Expiration of Approval A Certificate of Demolition expires if the work authorized by the Certificate of Demolition is not commenced within 180 days from the date of final approval. A final, one-time extension for the commencement of work of 90 days may be granted by the Administrator upon written request by the applicant showing circumstances beyond the control of the applicant. If the Certificate of Demolition expires, a new Certificate of Demolition must first be obtained before the work can commence. 191 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 27 H. Demolition by Neglect 1. Prohibition No owner or person with an interest in real property included within a Historic Preservation Overlay District shall permit the property to fall into a serious state of disrepair so as to result in the deterioration of any exterior architectural feature or structural compromise which would, in the judgment of the Landmark Commission, produce a detrimental effect upon the character of the Historic Preservation Overlay District as a whole or the life and character of the property itself. Examples of such deterioration include, but are not limited to: · Deterioration of the foundation. · Deterioration of floor supports or the addition of floor supports that are insufficient to carry the loads imposed. · Deterioration of walls, windows, doors, or other vertical supports, or the addition of such supports that are of insufficient size or strength to carry the loads imposed. · Deterioration of roof or other horizontal members. · Deterioration of exterior chimneys. · Deterioration or crumbling of exterior stucco or mortar. · Ineffective waterproofing of exterior walls, roof, or foundations, including broken windows or doors. · Defective weather protection or lack of weather protection for exterior wall coverings, including lack of paint or other protective coating. · Any fault, defect, or condition in the structure that renders it structurally unsafe or not properly watertight. · Deterioration of any feature so as to create a hazardous condition which could lead to the claim that demolition is necessary for the public safety. 2. Procedure a. Purpose The purpose of the Demolition by Neglect procedure is to allow the Landmark Commission to work with the property owner to encourage maintenance and stabilization of the structure and identify resources available before any enforcement action is taken. b. Request for investigation Any interested party may request that the Historic Preservation Officer investigate whether a property is being Demolished by Neglect. c. First meeting with the property owner Upon receipt of a request, the Historic Preservation Officer and City Building Official shall meet with the property owner or the property owner’s agent with control of the structure to inspect the structure and discuss the resources available for financing any necessary repairs. After the meeting, the Historic Preservation Officer shall prepare a report for the Landmark Commission on the condition of the structure, the repairs needed to maintain and stabilize the structure, any resources available for financing the repairs, and the amount of time needed to complete the repairs. d. Certification and notice After review of the report in a public meeting, the Landmark Commission may vote to certify the property as a Demolition by Neglect case. If the Landmark Commission certifies the structure as a Demolition by Neglect case, the Landmark Commission shall notify the property owner or the property owner’s agent with control over the structure of the repairs that must be made. The notice must require that repairs be started within thirty (30) days and set a deadline for completion of the repairs. The notice shall be sent by certified mail. e. Second meeting with the property owner 192 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 28 The Historic Preservation Officer and the City Building Official shall meet with the property owner or the property owner’s agent with control over the structure at least within sixty (60) days after the notice was sent to inspect any repairs. f. Referral for enforcement If the property owner or the property owner’s agent with control over the structure fails to start repairs by the deadline set in the notice, fails to make continuous progress toward completion, or fails to complete repairs by the deadline set in the notice, the Landmark Commission may refer the Demolition by Neglect case to the City’s Code Enforcement Division for appropriate enforcement action to prevent Demolition by Neglect. I. Demolition by Condemnation Reasonable attempts to engage a property owner in a Demolition by Neglect procedure shall be made when there is concern for the deterioration of a structure, but when a structure or equipment is found by the City Building Official to be a dangerous structure, the provisions of the City of College Station Code of Ordinances regulating dangerous structures will apply. J. Historic Preservation Fund 1. The City of College Station, in cooperation with community organizations, shall develop appropriate funding structures and shall administer the historic preservation fund. 2. The historic preservation fund is composed of the following funds: a. Outside funding (other than City general funds or capital funds), such as grants and donations, made to the City for the purpose of historic preservation and funding partnerships with community organizations. b. Damages recovered pursuant to TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 315.006 from persons who illegally demolish or adversely affect historic structures. 3. The outside funding may be used for financing the following activities: a. Necessary repairs in Demolition by Neglect cases; b. Full or partial restoration of low-income residential and nonresidential structures; c. Full or partial restoration of publicly owned historic structures; d. Acquisition of historic structures, places, or areas through gift or purchase; e. Public education of the benefits of historic preservation or the regulations governing Historic Preservation Overlay Districts; and f. Identification and cataloging of structures, places, areas, and districts of historical, cultural, or architectural value along with factual verification of their significance. 4. Damages recovered pursuant to Texas Local Government Code Section 315.006 must be used only for the following purposes: a. Construction, using as many of the original materials as possible, of a structure that is a reasonable facsimile of a demolished historic structure; b. Restoration, using as many of the original materials as possible, of the historic structure; and c. Restoration of another historic structure. 193 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 29 XI. That Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 5, “District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards”, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended by adding Section 5.10, “Historic Preservation Overlay District” to read as follows: 5.10 Historic Preservation Overlay District A. Purpose The Historic Preservation Overlay District is intended to provide for the protection and preservation of places and areas of historical, cultural, and architectural importance and significance. Such action is necessary to promote the economic, cultural, educational, and general welfare of the public. Specifically, this district has the following expressed purposes: 1. To protect and enhance the landmarks and districts which represent distinctive elements of College Station’s historic, architectural, and cultural heritage; 2. To foster civic pride in the accomplishments of the past; 3. To protect and enhance College Station’s attractiveness to visitors and the support and stimulus to the economy thereby provided; 4. To insure the harmonious, orderly, and efficient growth and development of the City; 5. To promote economic prosperity and welfare of the community by encouraging the most appropriate use of such property within the City; and 6. To encourage stabilization, restoration, and improvements of such properties and their values. B. Applicability The Historic Preservation Overlay District may be applied to districts, areas, or individual property, regardless of the base zoning district or current use of the property(ies), that: 1. Are at least forty (40) years old; 2. Meet at least two (2) of the criteria listed below; and 3. Possess integrity that is evident through historic qualities including Location, Design, Setting, Materials, Workmanship, Feeling, and Association. C. Criteria for Designation of Historic Preservation Overlay Districts A property or district may be designated if it: 1. Possesses significance in history, architecture, archeology, and culture; 2. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local, regional, state, or national history; 3. Is associated with events that have made a significant impact in our past; 4. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; 5. Represents the work of a master designer, builder, or craftsman; 6. Represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood or city; or 7. Is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, Recorded Texas Historic Landmark, or a State Archaeological Landmark, as determined by the Texas Historical Commission. 194 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 30 D. Removal of a Historic Preservation Overlay District Upon recommendation of the Landmark Commission to the Planning and Zoning Commission based upon new and compelling evidence and negative evaluation according to the same criteria and following the same procedures set forth in this UDO for designation, the Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend to the City Council and the City Council may remove an Historic Preservation Overlay District made under this section. 195 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 31 XII. That Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 10, “Enforcement”, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended by adding Section 10.5, “Specific Penalties for Certificates of Appropriateness and Certificates of Demolition” to read as follows: 10.5 Specific Penalties for Certificates of Appropriateness and Certificates of Demolition A. A person is criminally responsible for a violation of Sections 3.9 Certificate of Appropriateness and 3.10 Certificate of Demolition if: 1. The person owns part or all of the property where the violation occurs, 2. The person is the agent of the owner of the property and is in control of the property, or 3. The person commits the violation or assists in the commission of the violation. B. Any person who adversely affects or demolishes a structure on property in a historic overlay district in violation of Sections 3.9 Certificate of Appropriateness and 3.10 Certificate of Demolition is liable pursuant to TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 315.006 for damages to restore or replicate, using as many of the original materials as possible, the structure to its appearance and setting prior to the violation. No Certificates of Appropriateness or building permits will be issued for construction on the site except to restore or replicate the structure. When these restrictions become applicable to a site, the Administrator shall cause to be filed a verified notice in the county deed records and these restrictions shall be binding on future owners of the property. These restrictions are in addition to any fines imposed. C. Prosecution in municipal court for an offense under this Section does not prevent the use of other enforcement remedies or procedures provided by other City ordinances or state of federal laws applicable to the person(s) charged with or the conduct involved in the offense. 196 September 11, 2008 Regular Agenda Item No. 8 Oakland Ridge Rezoning To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Bob Cowell, AICP, Director of Planning & Development Services Agenda Caption: Public hearing, presentation, possible action and discussion on an ordinance rezoning 34.06 acres from A-O, Agricultural-Open to R-1, Single Family Residential (17.48) acres, R-3, Townhouse (10.09 acres), and R-4, Multi-Family Residential (6.49 acres) located off Jones-Butler Road and near Cain Road, adjacent to the Las Palomas Subdivision. Recommendation(s): The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval in their August 21, 2008 meeting. Staff also recommended approval. Summary: REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: This property is currently undergoing a Comprehensive Plan Amendment which was recommended for approval by the City of College Station Planning and Zoning Commission on July 17, 2008. It is scheduled to be heard by City Council on August 18, 2008. The proposed amendment will allow the uses approved on the Master Plan to be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood: The surrounding properties consist of grandfathered duplexes zoned A-O (Las Palomas Subdivison), a future R-1 development (Great Oaks Subdivison), undeveloped A-O property, and Jones-Butler Road. The proposed rezoning of the subject property will be compatible with the urban density development that is taking place to the south and west of this property. 3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The subject property is sufficiently large enough with direct access to Jones Butler for the mix of uses proposed with this rezoning. The proposed uses were approved with the Master Plan for the development when it began developing in the Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction, and outside the City’s land use authority. 4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The subject property is suitable for agricultural uses and could continued to be used as such; however, the platting of the process for single-family development has already begun and may proceed because of grandfathered allowances in state annexation laws. 5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The marketability will not be affected by this proposed rezoning. The uses have been approved with the Master Plan, and may therefore be developed without rezoning. 6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for the proposed use: The subject property is located adjacent to a 197 12-in City of College Station sanitary sewer main. The subject property is located outside of the City’s water service area; however, staff understands that Wellborn Water has an 8-in water main located adjacent to this property and plans to serve this development. The subject property plans to utilize a detention basin which is located near the southwest portion of the tract. The detention basin was originally built with the Las Palomas Subdivision. The subject property will take access to Jones Butler (Major Collector). Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. Item Background 2. Draft Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes, July 17, 2008 3. Ordinance 198 NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: August 21, 2008 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: September 11, 2008 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: None. Property owner notices mailed: 30 Contacts in support: 0 Contacts in opposition: 0 Inquiry contacts: 2 ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North Rural Residential A-O Agricultural South Rural Residential A-O Las Palomas - duplexes East Major Collector N/A - Thoroughfare Jones-Butler Road West Single- Family Medium Density R-1B Great Oaks - vacant DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: March 2008 Zoning: A-O, Agricultural Open Final Plat: Approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on 11/01/2007, but has not been filed for record Site development: vacant 199 MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting Thursday, July 17, 2008 at 7:00 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman John Nichols, Noel Bauman, Paul Greer, Doug Slack, Hugh Stearn and Thomas Woodfin COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Bill Davis CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Larry Stewart CITY STAFF PRESENT: Senior Planners Jennifer Prochazka and Lindsay Boyer, Staff Planners Jason Schubert and Lauren Hovde, Assistant City Engineer Josh Norton, Senior Assistant City Engineer Carol Cotter, City Engineer Alan Gibbs, Director Bob Cowell, Assistant Director Lance Simms, Planning Administrator Molly Hitchcock, First Assistant City Attorney Carla Robinson, Action Center Representative Kerry Mullins and Staff Assistant Brittany Caldwell 1. Call Meeting to Order. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an amendment to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, from Rural Residential to Single Family Residential Medium Density, Single Family Residential High Density, Residential Attached, and Planned Development for a mix of commercial uses, for 39.873 acres located off Jones-Butler Road and near Cain Road, adjacent to the Las Palomas Subdivision. Case #08-00500130 (LB) Lindsay Boyer, Senior Planner, presented the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and recommended approval. Commissioner Stearns asked if there were issues of connectivity onto Jones Butler Road and if there were buffer requirements between the different uses. Ms. Boyer stated that there were two access points onto Jones Butler Road that meet spacing requirements and a buffer was not required because of the Right-of- Way on the preliminary plat that separates all three uses. Chairman Nichols asked why the applicant chose a PDD zoning rather than C-1, General Commercial. 200 Chairman Nichols opened the public hearing. David Borsack, applicant, stated that he chose the PDD zoning because he did not want uses on the property that C-1, General Commercial allows. Chairman Nichols closed the public hearing. Commissioner Bauman motioned to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Commissioner Woodfin seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 201 ORDINANCE NO. _____ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, “UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE,” SECTION 4.2, “OFFICIAL ZONING MAP,” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AFFECTING CERTAIN PROPERTIES AS DESCRIBED BELOW; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 4.2, “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and made a part of this ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: That any person, firm, or corporation violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than Twenty-five Dollars ($25.00) nor more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. Said Ordinance, being a penal ordinance, becomes effective ten (10) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by Section 35 of the Charter of the City of College Station. PASSED, ADOPTED and APPROVED this 11th day of September, 2008. APPROVED: ____________________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: _______________________________ City Secretary APPROVED: _______________________________ City Attorney 202 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 2 t\c:\docume~1\tmcnutt\locals~1\temp\ordinance revised.doc 9/5/08 EXHIBIT “A” That Chapter 12, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Section 4.2, “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: I. The following property is rezoned from A-O, Agricultural Open to R-1, Single-Family Residential: BEING A 17.48 ACRE TRACT LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE CRAWFORD BURNETT SURVEY – ABSTRACT NO. 7, COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN 39.893 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID S. BORSACK BY DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 3350, PAGES 238 OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT “B”, AND GRAPHICALLY SHOWN IN EXHIBIT “E”. II. The following property is rezoned from A-O, Agricultural Open to R-3, Townhouse: BEING A 10.09 ACRE TRACT LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE CRAWFORD BURNETT SURVEY – ABSTRACT NO. 7, COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN 39.893 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID S. BORSACK BY DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 3350, PAGES 238 OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT “C”, AND GRAPHICALLY SHOWN IN EXHIBIT “E”. III. The following property is rezoned from A-O, Agricultural Open to R-4, Multi-Family: BEING A 6.49 ACRE TRACT LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE CRAWFORD BURNETT SURVEY – ABSTRACT NO. 7, COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN 39.893 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DAVID S. BORSACK BY DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 3350, PAGES 238 OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT “D”, AND GRAPHICALLY SHOWN IN EXHIBIT “E”. 203 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 3 t\c:\docume~1\tmcnutt\locals~1\temp\ordinance revised.doc 9/5/08 EXHIBIT “B” 204 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 4 t\c:\docume~1\tmcnutt\locals~1\temp\ordinance revised.doc 9/5/08 205 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 5 t\c:\docume~1\tmcnutt\locals~1\temp\ordinance revised.doc 9/5/08 EXHIBIT “C” 206 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 6 t\c:\docume~1\tmcnutt\locals~1\temp\ordinance revised.doc 9/5/08 207 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 7 t\c:\docume~1\tmcnutt\locals~1\temp\ordinance revised.doc 9/5/08 EXHIBIT “D” 208 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 8 t\c:\docume~1\tmcnutt\locals~1\temp\ordinance revised.doc 9/5/08 209 ORDINANCE NO.__________________ Page 9 t\c:\docume~1\tmcnutt\locals~1\temp\ordinance revised.doc 9/5/08 EXHIBIT “E” 210 September 11, 2008 Regular Agenda Item No. 9 Ordinance Increasing Atmos Rates To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Hayden Migl, Assistant to the City Manager Agenda Caption: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance approving an increase in rates for Atmos Energy pursuant to the Rate Review Mechanism tariff approved earlier this year. Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of the ordinance. Summary: The City of College Station, along with 150 other cities served by Atmos Energy Mid-Tex Division ("Atmos" or "Company"), is a member of the Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC"). On April 14, 2008, Atmos filed with the City an application to increase natural gas rates pursuant to the Rate Review Mechanism ("RRM") tariff approved by the City earlier this year. The Company's April RRM filing seeks a $33.5 million rate increase. The City worked with ACSC to analyze the schedules and evidence offered by Atmos to support its request to increase rates. The Ordinance and attached tariff approving rates that will increase the Company's revenues by $20 million effective October 1, 2008, are the result of negotiation between ACSC and the Company to resolve issues raised by ACSC during the review and evaluation of ACSC's RRM filing. The monthly bill impact for the average residential customer is $0.81. The ACSC Executive Committee recommends that all ACSC cities adopt the ordinance implementing the rate change. The RRM tariff was approved by cities as part of the settlement agreement to resolve Atmos' 2007 rate increase case. Atmos' rate request represents the first filing pursuant to the three-year trial project known as the RRM process. The RRM process was created collaboratively by the Steering Committee and Atmos as an alternative to the GRIP surcharge process. The RRM process allows for a more comprehensive rate review and annual adjustment that will function as a substitute for future GRIP filings during the three- year trial period specified by the tariff. Budget & Financial Summary: The monthly bill impact for the average residential customer is $0.81. Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2. Tariffs “Attachment A” 3. Proof of Revenue “Attachment B” 4. Model Staff Report 5. Rate Review Mechanism Fact Sheet 6. Memorandum from Rate Case Consultants Lloyd Gosselink Attorneys at Law 211 ORDINANCE NO. ______________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, ("CITY") APPROVING A NEGOTIATED RESOLUTION BETWEEN THE ATMOS CITIES STEERING COMMITTEE AND ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION ("ATMOS MID-TEX" OR "THE COMPANY") REGARDING THE COMPANY'S RATE REVIEW MECHANISM FILING IN ALL CITIES EXERCISING ORIGINAL JURISDICTION; DECLARING EXISTING RATES TO BE UNREASONABLE; ADOPTING TARIFFS THAT REFLECT RATE ADJUSTMENTS CONSISTENT WITH THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT AND FINDING THE RATES TO BE SET BY THE ATTACHED TARIFFS TO BE JUST AND REASONABLE; APPROVING ATMOS' PROOF OF REVENUES; ADOPTING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; DETERMINING THAT THIS ORDINANCE WAS PASSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT; DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND REQUIRING DELIVERY OF THIS ORDINANCE TO THE COMPANY AND LEGAL COUNSEL. WHEREAS, the City of College Station, Texas ("City") is a gas utility customer of Atmos Energy Corp., Mid-Tex Division ("Atmos Mid-Tex" or "the Company"), and a regulatory authority with an interest in the rates and charges of Atmos Mid-Tex; and WHEREAS, the City is a member of the Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC"), a coalition of more than 150 similarly situated cities served by Atmos Mid-Tex that have joined together to facilitate the review and response to natural gas issues affecting rates charged in the Atmos Mid-Tex service area (such participating cities are referred to herein as "ACSC Cities"); and WHEREAS, Atmos and ACSC Cities have been in continuing disagreement, dispute, and litigation over the implementation of GRIP surcharges pursuant to Section 104.301 of the Texas Utilities Code; and WHEREAS, as part of the negotiations to resolve Atmos' 2007 rate case, ACSC Cities and the Company worked collaboratively to develop the Rate Review Mechanism ("RRM") tariff that allows for an expedited rate review process controlled by Cities as a substitute to the current GRIP process instituted by the Legislature; and WHEREAS, the City took action earlier this year to approve a Settlement Agreement with Atmos Mid-Tex resolving the Company's 2007 rate case and authorizing the RRM Tariff; and WHEREAS, on or about April 14, 2008, Atmos Mid-Tex filed with the City its first application pursuant to the RRM tariff to increase natural gas rates by approximately $33.5 million, such increase to be effective in every municipality that has adopted the RRM tariff within its Mid-Tex Division; and 212 ORDINANCE NO. ______________ 2 WHEREAS, ACSC Cities coordinated its review of Atmos' RRM filing and designated a Negotiation Committee made up of ACSC representatives and assisted by ACSC attorneys and consultants to resolve issues identified by ACSC in the Company’s RRM filing; and WHEREAS, the Company has filed evidence that existing rates are unreasonable and should be changed; and WHEREAS, independent analysis by ACSC's rate expert concluded that Atmos is able to justify a rate increase of $19.8 million; and WHEREAS, the ACSC Executive Committee, as well as ACSC lawyers and consultants, recommends ACSC members approve the attached rate tariffs ("Attachment A" to this Ordinance) that will increase the Company's revenue requirement by $20 million; and WHEREAS, the attached tariffs implementing new rates and Atmos' Proof of Revenues ("Attachment B" to this Ordinance) are consistent with the negotiated resolution reached by ACSC Cities (including but not limited to a reduction of the residential customer monthly charge to $7.00 per month) and are just, reasonable, and in the public interest; and WHEREAS, it is the intention of the parties that ACSC Cities receive the benefit of any Settlement Agreement that Atmos enters into with other entities arising out of its RRM or any associated appeals of a decision entered by the Railroad Commission regarding the Company's request to increase rates. The ACSC Cities’ acknowledge that the exercise of this right is conditioned upon the ACSC Cities’ acceptance of all rates, revenues, terms and conditions of any other Settlement Agreement or associated appeals arising out of the Company’s RRM filing in toto; and WHEREAS, the negotiated resolution of the Company's RRM filing and the resulting rates are, as a whole, is in the public interest; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: Section 1. That the findings set forth in this Ordinance are hereby in all things approved. Section 2. That the City Council finds that the existing rates for natural gas service provided by Atmos Mid-Tex are unreasonable and new tariffs and Atmos' proof of revenues, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein as Attachments A and B, are just and reasonable and are hereby adopted. Section 3. That to the extent any resolution or ordinance previously adopted by the Council is inconsistent with this Ordinance, it is hereby repealed. Section 4. That the meeting at which this Ordinance was approved was in all things conducted in strict compliance with the Texas Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. 213 ORDINANCE NO. ______________ 3 Section 5. That if any one or more sections or clauses of this Ordinance is adjudged to be unconstitutional or invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remaining provisions of this Ordinance and the remaining provisions of the Ordinance shall be interpreted as if the offending section or clause never existed. Section 6. That if ACSC Cities determine any rates, revenues, terms and conditions, or benefits resulting from a Final Order or subsequent negotiated settlement approved in any proceeding addressing the issues raised in Atmos' RRM filing would be more beneficial to the ACSC Cities than the terms of the attached tariff, then the more favorable rates, revenues, terms and conditions, or benefits shall additionally accrue to the ACSC Cities. Exercise of this right is conditioned upon ACSC Cities' acceptance of all rates, revenues, terms and conditions of any other Settlement Agreement or associated appeals arising out of the Company’s RRM filing in toto. Section 7. That this Ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage with rates authorized by attached Tariffs to be effective for customer bills delivered on or after October 1, 2008. Section 8. That a copy of this Ordinance shall be sent to Atmos Mid-Tex, care of David Park, Vice President Rates and Regulatory Affairs, at Atmos Energy Corporation, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1800, Dallas, Texas 75240, and to Geoffrey Gay, General Counsel to ACSC, at Lloyd Gosselink Rochelle & Townsend, P.C., P.O. Box 1725, Austin, Texas 78767-1725. PASSED AND APPROVED this _______ day of __________________, 2008. _________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________ City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: E-Signed by Harvey Cargill VERIFY authenticity with ApproveIt ___________________________________ City Attorney 214 ATTACHMENT A 215 ATTACHMENT A 216 ATTACHMENT A 217 ATTACHMENT A 218 ATTACHMENT A 219 ATTACHMENT A 220 ATTACHMENT A 221 ATTACHMENT A 222 ATTACHMENT A 223 ATTACHMENT A 224 ATTACHMENT A 225 ATTACHMENT A 226 ATTACHMENT A 227 ATTACHMENT A 228 ATTACHMENT B 229 ATTACHMENT B 230 ATTACHMENT B 231 Atmos RRM Ordinance Staff Report 1 MODEL STAFF REPORT The City, along with 150 other cities served by Atmos Energy Mid-Tex Division ("Atmos" or "Company"), is a member of the Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSC"). On April 14, 2008, Atmos filed with the City an application to increase natural gas rates pursuant to the Rate Review Mechanism ("RRM") tariff approved by the City earlier this year. The Company's April RRM filing seeks a $33.5 million rate increase. The City worked with ACSC to analyze the schedules and evidence offered by Atmos to support its request to increase rates. The Ordinance and attached tariff approving rates that will increase the Company's revenues by $20 million effective October 1, 2008, are the result of negotiation between ACSC and the Company to resolve issues raised by ACSC during the review and evaluation of ACSC's RRM filing. The monthly bill impact for the average residential customer is $0.81. The ACSC Executive Committee recommends that all ACSC cities adopt the ordinance implementing the rate change. RRM Background: The RRM tariff was approved by cities as part of the settlement agreement to resolve Atmos' 2007 rate increase case. Atmos' rate request represents the first filing pursuant to the three-year trial project known as the RRM process. The RRM process was created collaboratively by the Steering Committee and Atmos as an alternative to the GRIP surcharge process. The RRM process allows for a more comprehensive rate review and annual adjustment that will function as a substitute for future GRIP filings during the three-year trial period specified by the tariff. There are two components to the RRM adjustment. The prospective component adjusts rates for known and measurable changes in O&M and net plant investment. Atmos and ACSC agreed to cap changes to expenses and invested capital at no more than five percent. The true up component evaluates whether the Company has over or underrecovered its earnings for the previous year. For purposes of the RRM true up component, Atmos' rate of return on equity and its capital structure are frozen to avoid the parent company from manipulating the overall rate of return. Costs expressly prohibited from recovery through the RRM include first class air-fare, travel, meals or entertainment for employee's spouse, alcohol, sports events, entertainment, arts and cultural events, sponsorship of sports, arts or cultural events, and social club membership dues. Purpose of the Ordinance: The purpose of the Ordinance is to approve rate tariffs (Attachment A) that reflect the negotiated rate change pursuant to the RRM process. The Ordinance also approves the Company's proof of revenues (Attachment B), a required part of the RRM filing. As a result of the negotiations, ACSC was able to reduce the Company's requested $33.5 million RRM increase by more than 35 percent. Approval of the Ordinance will result in rates that implement a $20 million increase in Atmos' revenues effective October 1, 2008. 232 Atmos RRM Ordinance Staff Report 2 Reasons Justifying Approval of the Negotiated Resolution: During the time that the City has retained original jurisdiction in this case, consultants working on behalf of ACSC cities have investigated the support for the Company's requested rate increase. While the evidence does not support the $33.5 million increase requested by the Company, ACSC consultants agree that the Company can justify an increase in revenues of at least $19.8 million. A contested case proceeding before the RRC on the Company's current application will take several months and cost ratepayers millions of dollars in rate case expenses and would not likely produce a request more favorable than that to be produced by the settlement. The ACSC Executive Committee recommends that ACSC members take action to approve the ordinance authorizing new rate tariffs. Explanation of "Be It Ordained" Paragraphs: 1. This paragraph approves all findings in the ordinance. 2. This section adopts the attached tariffs (Attachment A) and Company's proof of revenues (Attachment B) in all respects and finds the rates set pursuant to the attached tariffs to be just, reasonable and in the public interest. Note that only new tariffs or existing tariffs that are being revised are attached to the Ordinance. Existing tariffs that are not being changed in any way are not attached to the Ordinance. 3. This section repeals any resolution or ordinance that is inconsistent with this Ordinance. 4. This section finds that the meeting was conducted in compliance with the Texas Open Meetings Act, Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. 5. This section is a savings clause, which provides that if any section(s) is later found to be unconstitutional or invalid, that finding shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remaining provisions of this Ordinance. This section further directs that the remaining provisions of the Ordinance are to be interpreted as if the offending section or clause never existed. 6. This section is a "Most Favored Nations" clause, which protects the City by mandating that if a Final Order or subsequent agreement approved in any proceeding addressing the issues raised in Atmos' RRM filing results in rates or terms that would be more beneficial to the ACSC Cities than the terms of this tariff, the City may, at its option, implement such more favorable rates or terms. The exercise of this right is contingent upon the City agreeing to adopt the terms of the Final Order or subsequent agreement in toto. 7. This section provides for an effective date upon passage. 8. This paragraph directs that a copy of the signed resolution be sent to a representative of the Company and legal counsel for ACSC. 233 Rate Review Mechanism Fact Sheet *The Rate Review Mechanism (RRM) was created as part of a collaborative agreement between ACSC and Atmos. It replaces the unworkable and contentious Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program (GRIP) surcharge process. *The RRM authorizes cities to meaningfully review and dispute the company’s annual rate filings in an expedited rate proceeding at the city level. This authority was lacking under the GRIP process. *The RRM will function as a substitute for future GRIP filings during the three-year trial period. *The RRM permits the Company to seek an annual review of its revenues, estimated cost of operations, and capital investments. In most cases, the company cannot seek rate adjustments greater than 5 percent. The Company must provide evidence as part of the annual review process that Cities can assess and, if necessary, challenge. *The RRM process allows Atmos to seek a surcharge from ratepayers if its anticipated expenses exceed its anticipated revenues for a 12 month period. However, if the Company's revenues exceed its authorized rate of return, it must issue refunds. Costs Expressly Prohibited from Recovery Under the RRM: First class air-fare, travel, meals or entertainment for employee's spouse, alcohol, sports events, entertainment, arts and cultural events, sponsorship of sports, arts or cultural events, and social club membership dues. The RRM is applicable only to the Company's base rates - the cost of delivering natural gas to customers. The commodity price of natural gas is a pass-through cost to customers that can change monthly based upon the price of natural gas. Process for RRM Filing: Cities have 90 days to review the Company's RRM filing. After the 90-day "Review Period," the 30-day "Response Period" allows Cities to work with the Company regarding issues identified by the city during the Review Period. Atmos Mid-Tex' first RRM was made April 14, 2008. In subsequent years, Atmos will make its RRM filing with Cities on or after April 1st of each year. (The filing date is referred to as the "Annual Evaluation Date" in the tariff.) The City and the Company commit to act collaboratively during this process. However, if Cities and the Company cannot come to agreement at the end of the Response Period, the Company may appeal a city's action or inaction on the RRM to the Railroad Commission. 234 235 816 Congress Avenue, Suite 1900 Austin, Texas 78701 Telephone: (512) 322-5800 Facsimile: (512) 472-0532 www.lglawfirm.com Ms. Doyle’s Direct Line: (512) 322-5820 Email: kdoyle@lglawfirm.com M E M O R A N D U M TO: Atmos City Steering Committee (ACSC) Members FROM: Geoffrey Gay Kristen Doyle DATE: August 13, 2008 RE: FINAL ACTION BY OCTOBER 1ST – Atmos RRM Settlement The ACSC Settlement Committee (Jay Doegey – Arlington, Danny Reed – Fort Worth, Mark Israelson – Plano, Don Wilson – Eastland, Cathy Cunningham – various ACSC cities, Phil Boyd – Lewisville, Rodney Adams – Irving), with the advice and input of ACSC consultants and lawyers, has worked to resolve the Company's pending $33.5 million Rate Review Mechanism ("RRM") rate increase request without the necessity of a protracted and costly contested case proceeding. The attached tariff that reflects rates that will increase Atmos' revenues by $20 million. The negotiated result represents a 35 percent reduction in Atmos' requested rate increase. The monthly bill impact for an average residential customers is $0.81. The RRM process was created by Atmos and ACSC to eliminate the piecemeal ratemaking GRIP process in favor of an expedited rate review controlled by cities The Company's filing is the first filing pursuant to the agreed RRM process. The ACSC Executive Committee recommends approval of the negotiated resolution because it represents an outcome that is equal to or better than the outcome expected from a lengthy contested case proceeding, and maintains cities' role as a regulator of natural gas rates. Please schedule consideration of the ordinance for your next available council meeting. Final council action to approve the ordinance must take place by October 1st. To assist you, several documents are attached: · An ordinance setting new rates. The approved Ordinance should include the attached Tariff ("Attachment A" to the Ordinance) and Proof of Revenues ("Attachment B") · A model staff report · An explanation of key provisions of the RRM tariff and filing Please contact Kristen (512/322-5820, kdoyle@lglawfirm.com) immediately if your city is unable to meet the October 1st deadline for final action. Once final action has been taken by your city, please forward a copy of the ordinance to Atmos Mid-Tex and to our paralegal, Gary Stiffler (fax number: 512/472-0532, gstiffler@lglawfirm.com). 236 September 11, 2008 Regular Agenda Item No. 10 Bond Referendum Brochure To: Glenn Brown, City Manager From: Wayne Larson, APR, Communications Director Agenda Caption: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a draft of the 2008 bond referendum brochure. Recommendation(s): Provide input to staff and approval of the brochure. Summary: The Public Communications Department is managing a comprehensive voter education campaign for the bond referendum. The campaign includes the use of a brochure to educate voters on the various projects to be considered in the bond referendum. The brochure will be sent to each resident in College Station and will be used to educate voters on project details and costs. The City will use the brochure in concert with other voter education tools: website, mass media, social media, TV19 and more. Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. A draft copy of the brochure will be distributed to Council prior to the meeting. 237