Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
07/12/2005 - Regular Minutes - Parks Board
, ye w e - ��. ���' '� t W l, z i l •; r,-;:?.::::,151A„1 *14,4,::'.. "' s t y ' '` � ° '.,s n i i q, . . ll" . t11+ r>� V i r r "` 1 " aj', gild it, '' v 4 ii t 4"; a ' * € .dig vi �; y t ka a ii,' li...,,-,:j:,- `1‘4,t,4:.t:,:., h,,,Vk,%414,,,, ,,Ki„,",!i..,',:14, 14.,:i ,.°-;f,'--::1,1":t7,,,,,,,,,1::::t„.‘.1.peitr,-;:::.4.111,':t.,,,::::,?,,,!1,,,441... ./,:::::',E;,,,,,..„Al Ki,' ,.'itk''.',1:1".,,,::'.,:i.,,,t, ,i,.,', � a k Staff Present: Steve Beachy, Director; Ric Ploeger, Assistant Director; Pamela Springfield, Staff Assistant Members Present: Jodi Warner; Jeannie McCandless; Glenn Schroeder; Don Allison; Larry Farnsworth; Gary Erwin; Gary Thomas; Carol Blaschke Members Absent: Kathleen Ireland Guests Present: No guests were present 1. Call to order. The meeting was called to order by Jodi Warner, Chair at 7:00 p.m. 2. Pardon N possible action concerning requests for absences of members from meeting. Kathleen Ireland had submitted a request for absence. Glenn S. moved to accept the request for Kathy and also to accept Gary Thomas' request from the June meeting, which had not been presented for approval. Larry F. seconded. All were in favor and the motion passed unanimously. 3. Hear visitors. Hearing none this item was closed. 4. Discussion, consideration, and Possible approval of minutes from Regular Board meeting on June 14, 2005. Glenn S. moved to accept the minutes from the June 14, 2005 regular meeting. Gary E. seconded, and the vote was called. The motion carried unanimously and the minutes were approved. 5. Discussion, consideration, and Possible action regarding Park Land Dedication requests for: • Callaway Villa Apartments ,.► This was a request for a proposed multi-family complex in Park Zone 7 located on Marion Pugh, close to the intersection of Wellborn and George Bush Drive - very close to the railroad tracks. The only park in that zone is John Crompton Park and staff was recommending acceptance of the cash dedication in order to use the money to enhance Crompton Park. It would be particularly helpful for developing the additional acreage that the city had just acquired to finish out Crompton Park. After brief discussion, Glenn S. moved acceptance of the recommendation to take the cash dedication in lieu of land, and Gary T. seconded. The vote was called. All were in favor and the motion carried unanimously. The building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive services must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call(979) 764-3517 or(TDD) 1-800-735-2989. 6. Report, discussion and possible action reciardinci potential changes to the Park Land Dedication Ordinance. Steve stated that this revision had been ongoing for over a year and was the latest version adapting the Park Land Dedication Ordinance into the Unified Development Ordinance. The Park Land Dedication Ordinance was basically the same - none of the fee amount requirements had changed nor had the purpose of the ordinance changed. The current changes for review were discussed. • If a phased development goes in, the developer will now have to dedicate all of the property dedication up front. This will probably be an item of contention with some developers. Development Services will have to push the developer now to master plan all of the property. • Cash and land dedications (three acres or less) below a certain amount could be processed on an administrative level with a recommendation straight to Planning & Zoning. This would provide a means of taking the Parks Board out of the loop. There would be criteria in place, and if the land didn't meet the criteria it would come back to the Parks Board. Since Planning & Zoning meets twice a month and Parks board only meets once, it could save thirty days or more, from the developer's standpoint, towards moving the development process forward. The needs of the Parks Board could be met with a monthly report and staff would still see the proposed dedications in order to catch possible problems. Jodi's reservation was that once this became part of the ordinance, it might cause the city to miss out on future pocket parks. Ric said this would only eliminate the dedications that were being subdivided or that were straightforward. Jodi requested that the board continue to be advised by a monthly report if this clause was approved. • The developer would now have the option to develop the park. There would be a series of items that would allow staff to control the process, with the developer being given certain standards and set dates that he would be required to meet, as well as conditions of acceptance and warranty requirements. This topic was the major reason that the Park Land Dedication Ordinance had been redone. If the developer built the park, the city would not have to bid out the project and do all of the contract administration. A developer could probably build the park cheaper than the city and it would save time since the park would be developed sooner, along with the subdivision. The list of standards was pretty inclusive as to the quality and scope of what would be accepted. The manual had been completed already and would be given to the developers. • Floodplain. Historically, the city has accepted floodplain at a greater ratio than has been required but those terms had never been spelled out. • Warranty Requirements. Warranty requirements had been included which were not in the original ordinance, with the language straight out of the city's construction contract. Steve stated that Planning and Zoning had not reviewed the draft yet and he wanted to hold a joint meeting in order to discuss this with them at one of their regular meetings. Gary T. suggested that the ordinance include a clause stating that if a park land dedication was going to be less than three acres, the Parks Board had to be notified. Glenn S. stated that on page 7, under item 'e', the terminology stated that "an administrator could allow an extension". He stated that this was the only place he saw "Administrator" and wanted to know if that was the city manager or his designee. Steve said he would have to check and see who was being referred to. Steve said he would pass along the suggestions given. Page 2 of 4 Don A. made a recommendation to move forward with this and to schedule a joint discussion/meeting with Planning & Zoning. Glenn S. seconded. Jodi stated that, being a recommendation, no vote was required. 7. Review, discussion, and possible action concerning Board and Departmental Goals and Objectives, and City Council Strategic Plan. • As reported at the last meeting, the first appraisal for the regional park had been received for 4,600± acres of land. The contract with the appraiser had been amended to do an appraisal on the entire 10,000 acres, which had been received. That appraisal had come in at a little over $872 per acre. The appraisal would be presented to the TMPA Board on September 8th in Denton. The State Conservation Fund and Grimes County representatives will be in attendance at that meeting. The Conservation Fund will also assist Grimes County with funding through grants with other non-profit organizations. Steve stated that on July 13th he, John Crompton, and Don Fazzino would be meeting with local representative for Chet Edwards, Lindsay Davis, to see if there was the potential for federal funding. There was also the potential for funding through Texas Highway Department. • The construction for Steeplechase Park would probably start in the fall and was currently in the design phase. • Jodi asked if anything was in the works for a park in Northgate. Steve stated that a water fountain was planned to go in, but there was no park plan at the present time. • One of the members asked about the status of the Urban Forest Management Plan and if anything had been done to move forward with it. Steve stated that nothing was being done at the present time. Steve passed out a copy of the report prepared by the consultant facilitating the recent council retreat to all the members. The four main issues that came out of the retreat as being priorities were: • growth management; • economic development; • collaboration - (College Station was not viewed as being open to collaboration with other agencies); and • neighborhood issues. Steve encouraged the Board to read through the report. Hearing no further discussion, this item was closed. 8. Report, discussion, and possible action concerning the Capital Improvement Program. • The Park Land Dedication Project List had been included in the members' packets. The most important project at present was Crompton Park. A lot of progress was being made. An important factor was that the purchase had been completed on the adjacent land. Ric stated that he been working on that purchase for approximately ten years. A lot of underbrush would need to be cleared to get to the pond and for the disc golf course, but this would be a great park once it was completed. • The Capital Improvement Project List had been included in members' packets. • Veterans Park and Athletic Complex, Phase II N The design for this project was moving forward. • Steeplechase N This project was about ten days away from going out to bid. Page 3 of 4 • The Spray Park change order for a filter recirculation system had been approved at the last council meeting and the design for that was moving forward. • Construction on the Jack & Dorothy Miller Park basketball court cover was beginning. 9. Discussion of next meeting dates and possible agenda items. • Next Regular Meeting would be August 9, 2005. At that meeting a report will be given about the landfill park site in Colorado visited by Ross Albrecht. A recreation center report based on that same visit will be given in October. • September Regular Meeting N September 13, 2005 • National Kids Day will be held at the Lincoln Center this year to take advantage of the new pavilion. The new fitness room there will be dedicated at same time. Lincoln Center had received the fitness equipment for the room from the College Station Medical Center. • Recognition plaques were given to outgoing board members Larry Farnsworth and Don Allison for their support and service on the board. Steve stated that everyone appreciated their leadership and guidance and that they would be missed. 10. Adjourn. Don A. moved to adjourn the meeting, with a second from Larry F. Jodi called for vote. All were in favor, and the meeting adjourned at 8:35 p.m. Page 4 of 4 Park Land Dedication Ordinance Project Review Checklist Date Received: 06-15-05 Park Zone: 7 Current Zone Balance: $233,649 Project Location: Marion Pugh Drive Name of Development: Callaway Villa Apartments Phase: N/A Applicant: American Campus Address: 805 Las Cimas Parkway#400 City/State/Zip: Austin, Texas 78746 Phone Number/Fax: 512-732-1000 Fax Number: 512-732-2453 E-mail: Engineer/Planner: Rabon Metcalf Engineering Address: P.O. Box 9253 City/StateZip: College Station, Texas 77842 Phone Number/Fax: 979-690-0329 Fax Number: 979-690-0329 E-Mail: rmengineer(a�iuno.com REQUIRED COMPLIANCE Section 10-B-1: Land Dedication Single Family Dwelling Units: 0 Multi-Family Dwelling Units: 236 Total Land Requirement: 1.888 Acres Proposed Dedication: 0 Section 10-B-2: Fee in Lieu of Land Has the Planning and Zoning Commission's approval been obtained? NO Land Fee: Single Family Fee ($198/dwelling unit): N/A Multi-Family Fee ($160/dwelling unit): $160 x 236 = $37,760 Total Acquisition Fee: $37,760 Section 10-B-3: Park Development Fee Single Family Fee ($358/dwelling unit): 0 Multi-family Fee ($292/dwelling unit): $292 x 236 = $68,912 Total Fee Amounts: Total Single Family Fee ($556/dwelling Unit): 0 Multi-Family Fee ($452/dwelling Unit): $452 x 236 = $106,672 Section 10-B-4: Park Development in Lieu of Fee Required development cost: N/A Staff review date and comment: June 15, 2005 Parks Board review and decision: N/A Section 10-B-5: Minimum Park Size Is the proposed park less than five (5) acres? N/A - CASH DEDICATION If yes, staff recommends: Section 10-B-7: Prior Park Acquisition John Crompton Park is located approximately 1/4 - Is there an existing park that can serve the proposed development? 1/2 mile away If yes, staff recommends: Acceptance of fees for both land and development Section 10-E: Comprehensive Plan Is the proposed park dedication in compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Recreation, Park, and Open Space Master Plan? Yes Comments: John Crompton Park is intended to serve the entire park zone 7 Section 10-F: Additional Information 1. Is land in the 100-year floodplain? N/A Percentage: a. Detention/Retention? N/A Size: Meets Board Policy? Acreage in floodplain: N/A Percentage: Acreage in detention: N/A Percentage: Acreage in greenways: N/A Percentage: Comments: Section 10-F (of the Park Land Dedication Ordinance) 10-F. 1 Any land dedication to the City under this section must be suitable for park and recreation uses. Consideration will be given to land that is in the floodplain or may be considered "floodable" even though not in a federally regulated floodplain as long as, due to its elevation, it is suitable for park improvements. NO LAND DEDICATION IS PROPOSED (a) Neighborhood park sites should be adjacent to residential areas in a manner that serves the greatest number of users. Comments: (b) Neighborhood park sites should be located so that users are not required to cross arterial roadways to access them. Comments: (c) Sites should not be severely sloped or have unusual topography which would render the land unusable for organized recreational activities. Comments: (d) Sites should have existing trees or other scenic elements. Comments: (e) Detention/retention areas will not be accepted as part of the required dedication, but may be accepted in addition to the required dedication. If accepted as part of the park, the detention/retention area design must be approved by the City staff and must meet specific parks specifications. Comments: 10-F. 2 Parks should be easy to access and open to public view so as to benefit area development, enhance the visual character of the city, protect public safety, and minimize conflict with adjacent land uses. The following guidelines should be used in designing parks and adjacent development: NO LAND DEDICATION IS PROPOSED (a) Where physically feasible, park sites should be located adjacent to greenways and/or schools in order to encourage both shared facilities and the potential co-development of new sites. Comments: (b) A proposed subdivision adjacent to a park may not be designed to restrict reasonable access to the park from other area subdivisions. Street and greenway connections to existing or future adjoining subdivisions may be required to provide reasonable access to parks. Comments: (c) Where a non-residential use must directly abut a park, the use must be separated by a screening wall or fence and landscaping. Access points to the park may be allowed by the Planning and Zoning Commission if a public benefit is established. Comments: (d) It is desirable that a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the perimeter of a park should abut a public street. In all cases, the City shall approve the proposed street alignment fronting on city parks. Comments: (e) Streets abutting a park shall be built in accordance with the thoroughfare plan and the standards of this ordinance; however, the City may require any residential street built adjacent to a park to be constructed to collector width to ensure access and prevent traffic congestion. The developer may request oversize participation in such an instance. Comments: Staff Recommendations: Acceptance of fees for land and development. Park Zone 7 is served by the new John Crompton Park (15.26 acres) located at the intersection of Holleman and the future extension of Jones Butler Road. Section 10-G: Approval: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board: At the regular meeting of the Board on July 12, 2005, the Board voted unanimously to accept the staff recommendation of the fees for land and development in the amount of$106,672. Planning & Zoning Commission: City Council: PI AN NOTES; • METCALF.E IPQ.pq I. REFER TO ONE SHEET b®nmil c1.IR FOR CONTINUATION OF F.M. 2154 ENGINEERING 0A0 Nit PLAN&001&Ls. WEU 0RN�R OAR,u,�� ��`a` UNION P�C«FIC RAS)OAD .E,,..n. (° '' 6S 46'43-W �� 36 66. .6. 10.00' IS rr E 966.06_ i vos .0,01 iS =w.,g --j-.21' �� .ws s ORN RTf OAD r F.M. 2154 w... """�"` .w,E 26' 1Y�E-__372‘t--•°. _ •- 8 .rr�.a,� s"�� :� r .rs, wai_B p�CIFIC BA RD n.[ N 63"46'43'E �� _- r_-r_r'a ) %1 •. rm...". _ UNION_ MOO' t�- --- ®G y .9.99, .., .." ildi NHHH� t a2-2-"4 artR.AK U°`i.. .o./i w COMM. rerr ,2-.. flr4•7.1.5•••••''.2--- 6.13_..�1Y E-:T4-." .. ��L']li�� ,.. _�,. m Q�a�^, )-I° •., jl� A�.�i l I 4 �r����0� 9046 COMPLETE cAL,A9Ay 900.p.99.4[,wE ES wort "w.R a O 4m. • �ar►�--� REVIEW ONLY 4 _ .. s 2 - -•0 • ., ',AFC ' MIN/I•V� -�' ' NOT FOR x A 044,1 PO L+RZm ��/m�F 1 7 O .m.. '�I /■���� n.� : :nNO. NOT 4,,::::,=;,,,,� - Vii` .- 7 I s s d �: _ ■ va;Fk . 6127105 I I � © �" 1 m1�IT ® I ,,x• I �W •, 1 •.�■6666 Ap a,.•MMES.• ,R ,a IR >.�� ,n,,,.,,..,,., 2-6„.96. y el �b �VNs �� ��_ .,, ., �M ''''I▪ "'":73,1•0::::::7>."7:7,111-ft',.,°•:77 ! 2-I" a LEC... PRELIMINARY O CONMVNITY • ' I I ,.. p I ®- II Y. ir I MS.WY.SCO <' .M.©1.ofrte I cENro( II co>„wx 6 666.,-- , ® ; . ' MS. .ea N/w5 O IL n51- .a4 -Y-1 ...a...w. 1 '�O,• .�5 i • �' 771E u,IE I F.A .q0 ' 70.... .. a '/i �^ I �< I'? Q ,® ;• ...z`-- 1'11,_ ,. ■ i .9050mp • ,.4»wO F ©� 9. m.0 SRC •''' S. L R� . ../ Q�' 11) 1n ;,... ®�.�- �o. I I • ,�r i o wa m - *n� = w,z %4 W 1= I ' O .w 1 13 CL ©mow 1p .-4.-. 111.9 m.mQ�<.. ". w km.., '.-.. „w °,.117,- , .. 0100 x;. © .., _ . ' I.. V~1 ` R ■W■■■ ■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■.w r/■ '3'.', ".M rt..°',w .Irri ■�l.rir y- CiC=i=�- O W _J----_ • .44 04 Ce W ..[xa.x.• 1...,. ,•6x50 �` ,.,w.. .,i:. �`""` .moi JJ.'.,ll ";,,, a...01...r�_1,.,..x�,.�. a...,. MARIONwPUGGH DRIVE J O MARION PUGH DRIVE ,�1..,Fw N .....,1%.1.: 6,66,6,. ,......• •P4, I a+["o,[[rn; 'iw,eo.muc,w� ,.Y,..,.. Q Q in L„1 Nu•0•71.-0-4.) •18'4Z 3r W-1014.76' ,.W coutcx.) Jean ww sE1x•rr,nxa. .O4,aw..o manor 66 66.., 4w.E... 0 r7 -- -- -- - -- w.sop O[t ,. - -- -- -- ---• f- --- - -- -- 50'".96 --------------------- - Q -< ILL .,1 ow.,r 041 MI 177 mom,EE.:�...0BUM. 1,„.".1.,.,.x+4 4... ..a a_ ` W k m;,14.,Aa w "o r: o[w�,ro`: COM.,Rs«a„ ::e2-OF a 6 SISE ww o1..T"...'..,•o["°`•[.Ct COMMo e....sx'N.w...e:,aa a, xo. m SOISS:'°,°...."i Sort`.._.•.,x) r o ucw �-0 '°m°'r..o `I I .r � �✓ / _r Z i.0-P...c ,24 20001 00 .Y.uwo. r PP .MAWS OM..uw:rte�✓ Q A3, Ora-•,uw n.x a4 200.CP r.SN n.".92-.9,2-.9. n sec -.•-aK.a.o u. �^UNE.4•„h. ,: :; nA w .. BMOC.A..,�.1 MO.CMC N, FS A..N.F 4.. .� • x°:: �m::.`n_e.w N s.N ).1 sra NOT. /,, �� v H d •w•-w.A^P641 05«w DO 0.[:"t «6x.1 4,.10,4..E x456. 0 177.. In.69 ar g FtA..m,e.t...� ..me..ow: 1III ti i no a,, - O: IN c it °I\i, OH' °■',• .1 - O I, 1', _ iii IL N-' ri ■ -"-+ �� i RT I nr R.-2M II =&i 1St NII' i !.! 'PIM •n ■ 6 ■ r : 4,,• , 1 :.N9 ti . ° xi , I .1!,. ,_. 'ii, 1 Nom; ,' to Vii° °:�, .„ snir A :° . : wa-9f 1 i� 1. •� - 1�I1\ ;gip 11 I immlIIIIS 4-1° 'fid , N ` ° " ■ ■ 41! :RE• _ O : f".411,�I F A11 � n: 1 ■' 3 a I\y I.e. E lo Er— • ■ n co a ■ 14 e I, ® '*R' ■• 11! ;A` N1 q� y nu. a 4I� °' : I gtio�t o +`, 1 *N' t _iMi 'so ;0 n ql LIlTl Q * 4'I P. t° 0 'u had i I, ,i' 1 _am L —d•■ j•ia N iso a.4 11 '.> IE _*kiiii ', I. °p,, A n, I 1 Q IS !- A -y ■ Yui: _ ■. „. . _iii _k;• •. Iilr nl *A� t• _hoig_ go_ °.� ;Ba rR;8.: MIL o,R1 s3 ' ,il i,mem Li Aid of SR R��� �i'�`~ f ;A 1Q 1 i lg., 7 ii iiiiiPigri 4 i dx ( �A IL s-••� 4 ��0�0•©• ,d E 4';4d '9 iE Im°9F- *� .��� �� iJ F 1411i!��` $ __ ❑ ° `G,�..., t• �l+9.10*.„_d i .0„04 p y- `d� RyS" S ° .� • •••. �r�' . e� �4a i�.5 I 3 i j r.-- o• •-0,'soks, ,�A2- •:i to R I �,.% .�r'.t i 61. pi h i l m .��41ti.:, t // ER°slc IR s I1"I:I"d:l"C lift l �' ;r, 1 SOUTH-HALF gg ,a;v b RR aic RR!t to z m§6 ,,,,3,. CALLAWAY VILLA 9$M$A a o Ae,1� �€ ` ' .;` i a§_;:iSi-,141 CIVIL 1 .1d =:'22 5. 0 ,i - a 1_1' APARTMENTS liar ii°ag , ..L 120 6 -t n. e SITE PITA g„cgioc5 1 #,, S g ! A 305 MARION PUGH DRIVE 0,54 a �Ax s g t€ � ''' PLAN COLLEGE STATION,TX i1`^it< 'z '< 1 t :7 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 9, "SUBDIVISIONS", AND CHAPTER 12, "UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS AS SET OUT BELOW; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That Chapter 9, "Subdivisions", and Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance", of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of this ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: That if any provisions of any section of this ordinance shall be held to be void or unconstitutional, such holding shall in no way effect the validity of the remaining provisions or sections of this ordinance, which shall remain in full force and effect. PART 3: That any person, firm, or corporation violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than Twenty Five Dollars ($25.00) nor more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each day such violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. Said Ordinance, being a penal ordinance, becomes effective ten (10) days after its date of passage by the City Council, as provided by Section 35 of the Charter of the City of College Station. PASSED, ADOPTED and APPROVED this day of , 2005. APPROVED: RON SILVIA, Mayor ATTEST: Connie Hooks, City Secretary APPROVED: City Attorney O/group/legal/ordinance/amendmentform.doc ORDINANCE NO. Page 2 EXHIBIT "A" That Chapter 9, "Subdivisions", of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: 1. By amending SECTION 10: "Requirements for Park Land Dedication" by deleting the entire section. 2. By amending SECTION 12: "Rural Residential Subdivision Regulations" by deleting the current paragraph 12-B "Applicable Sections", to read as follows. "Sections 1 — 7, 9 of this ordinance and Article 8.4 of the Unified Development Ordinance are applicable in their entirety to rural residential subdivisions." That Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance", of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby amended as follows: 3. By amending ARTICLE 8: "Subdivision Design and Improvements" adding a new Section 8.5, "Requirements For Parkland Dedication" to read as follows. 8.5 Requirements For Parkland Dedication A. Purpose This section is adopted to provide recreational areas in the form of neighborhood parks as a function of subdivision and site development in the City of College Station. This section is enacted in accordance with the home rule powers of the City of College Station, granted under the Texas Constitution, and the statutes of the State of Texas, including, but not by way of limitation, Texas Local Government Code Chapter 212 (Vernon 1999; Vernon Supp. 2004-2005). It is hereby declared by the City Council that recreational areas in the form of neighborhood parks are necessary and in the public welfare, and that the only adequate procedure to provide for neighborhood parks is by integrating such a requirement into the procedure for planning and developing property or subdivisions in the city, whether such development consists of new construction on vacant land or rebuilding and remodeling of structures on existing residential property. Neighborhood parks are those parks providing for a variety of outdoor recreational opportunities and located within convenient distances from a majority of the culc.Idocume-Ilpsprin-Illocals-Iltemplchapter 9 amendment parkland.doc 7/7/05 ORDINANCE NO. Page 3 residences to be served thereby. The park zones established by the Parks and Recreation Department and shown on the official Parks and Recreation map for the City of College Station shall be prima facie proof that any park located therein is within such a convenient distance from any residence located therein. The primary cost of neighborhood parks should be borne by the ultimate residential property owners who, by reason of the proximity of their property to such parks, shall be the primary beneficiaries of such facilities. Therefore, the following requirements are adopted to affect the purposes stated above and shall apply to any land to be used for residential purposes: B. General Requirements The City Manager or his designee shall administer this Section 8.5, Requirements for Parkland Dedication with certain review, recommendation and approval authorities being assigned to the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. Dedications shall cover both land acquisition and development costs for neighborhood parkland for all types of residential development. Dedications shall be based on actual dwelling units for the entire development. Increases or decreases in final unit count prior to final plat will require an adjustment in fees paid or land dedicated. If the actual number of dwelling units exceeds the original estimate additional parkland shall be dedicated in accordance with the requirements in this Section 8.5 with the filing of a final plat. The methodology used to calculate fees and land dedications is attached hereto as Appendix 1 and incorporated and made a part of this ordinance for all purposes. Fees paid under this Section may be used only for development or acquisition of a neighborhood park located within the same zone as the development. i. Land Dedication For single family developments the area of land to be dedicated for parkland purposes shall be equal to one (1) acre for each one hundred one (101) dwelling units. For duplex and other multi-family development this area shall be equal to one (1) acre for each one hundred twenty-five (125) dwelling units. cuk.. docume-Ilpsprin-Illocals-Iliemplchapler 9 amendment parkland doe 7/7/05 ORDINANCE NO. Page 4 The total amount of land dedicated for the development shall be dedicated in fee simple by plat: a. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for multi-family development, or where a plat is not required under the Unified Development Ordinance or b. For a phased development the entire park shall be platted concurrently with the plat of the first phase of the development. 2. Fee in Lieu of Land The amount of the Fee-in-Lieu of Land ("Fee") shall be set at an amount sufficient to cover the costs of the acquisition of neighborhood parkland. A landowner may elect to meet the requirements of Section 8.5.B.1., in whole or in part, by paying a fee in the amount set forth below. Before making this election, for any required dedication greater than three (3) acres, or for any development containing floodplain or greenway, the landowner must: a. Obtain a recommendation from the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and b. Obtain approval from the Planning& Zoning Commission pursuant to the Plat Approval Procedures in Article 3.3 of the Unified Development Ordinance. The fee shall be calculated as follows: • One hundred ninety-eight dollars ($198.00)per dwelling unit for single family development • One hundred sixty dollars ($160.00)per dwelling unit for duplex and multi-family development. culc.Idocume-llpsprin-Illocals-lltemplchapter 9 amendment parkland doc 7/7/05 ORDINANCE NO. Page 5 The total amount of the Fee calculated for the development shall be remitted: • Prior to the issuance of any building permits for multi family development, or where a plat is not required under the Unified Development Ordinance or • Upon submission of each final plat for single family, duplex or townhouse development. Fees may be used only for acquisition or development of a neighborhood park located within the same zone as the development. The City Manager or his designee is authorized to accept the Fee for dedications of less than three (3) acres where: • There is no floodplain or greenway • If there is a sufficient amount of parkland existing in the park zone of the proposed development or • The proposed dedication is insufficient for a Neighborhood Park site. cu l c:Idocume--/Ipsprin--1 llocals-4I tempt chapter 9 amendment parkland.doc 7/7/05 ORDINANCE NO. Page 6 This determination shall be made based on the Recreation, Park & Open Space Master Plan, as amended from time to time. 3. Park Development Fee In addition to the land dedication, there shall also be a fee established that is sufficient to develop the land to meet the Manual of Neighborhood Park Improvements Standards to serve the zone in which such development is located. This fee shall be computed on the basis of three hundred fifty-eight dollars ($358.00) per dwelling unit for single family developments and two hundred ninety-two ($292.00) for duplex and multi-family development. The total fee shall be paid upon submission of each final plat or upon application for a building permit, whichever is applicable. 4. Park Development Option in Lieu of Fee A landowner may elect to construct the neighborhood park improvements in lieu of paying the Park Development Fee under the following terms and conditions: a. A park concept plan, developed in cooperation with the Parks and Recreation Department staff must be submitted to the City Manager or his designee for review. A concept plan approved by the Director of Parks and Recreation and Parks and Recreation Advisory Board is required upon submission of each final plat or upon application for a building permit, whichever is applicable. b. Within twelve (12) months from the date of said submission or application the landowner shall submit detailed plans and specifications in compliance with the Concept Plan to the City Manager or his designee for review and approval. c. All plans and specifications shall meet or exceed the Manual of Neighborhood Park Improvement Standards in effect at the time of the submission. culc.Idocume—llpsprin-11locals—Iltemplchapter 9 amendment parkland doc 7/7/05 ORDINANCE NO. Page 7 d. If the improvements are constructed on land that has already been dedicated and/or is owned by the City, then the Developer must post Payment and Performance Bonds to guarantee the payment of all subcontractors and suppliers and to guarantee Developer completes the work in accordance with the approved plans, specifications, ordinances, other applicable laws and that City has issued a Certificate of Acceptance for the improvements. e. The construction of all improvements must be completed within two (2)years from the date of the approval of the plans and specifications. A final, one-time extension of twelve months may be granted by the Administrator upon demonstration of substantial progress and the lack of changed or changing conditions in the area. f. Completion and Acceptance—Park development will be considered complete and a letter of completion will be issued after the following requirements are met: (1) Improvements must have been constructed in accordance with the Approved Plans (2) All parkland upon which the improvements have been constructed has been dedicated as required under this ordinance (3) All manufacturer's warranties have been provided for any equipment g. Upon issuance of a Certificate of Completion, Landowner warrants for a period of one (1)year as per the requirements in the Manual of Neighborhood Park Improvements Standards. h. The developer shall be liable for any costs required to complete park development if (1) Developer fails to complete the improvements in accordance with the Approved Plans (2) Developer fails to complete any warranty work (3) Developer fails to dedicate the parkland on which the improvements are constructed culc:Idocume-4 psprin—lllocals—lltemplchapter 9 amendment parkland.doc 7/7/05 ORDINANCE NO. Page 8 5. Reimbursement for City Acquired Parkland The City may from time to time acquire land for parks in or near an area of actual or potential development. If the City does acquire park land in a park zone, the City may require subsequent parkland dedications for that zone to be in Fee-in Lieu-of-Land only. This will be to reimburse the City for the cost(s) of acquisition. Once the City has been reimbursed entirely for all such parkland within a park zone, this Section shall cease to apply, and the other Sections of Section 8.5 shall again be applicable. C. Prior Dedication or Absence of Prior Dedication If a dedication requirement arose prior to enactment of this Section 8.5, that dedication requirement shall be controlled by the ordinance in effect at the time such obligation arose, except that additional dedication shall be required if the actual density of structures constructed upon property is greater than the former assumed density. Additional dedication shall be required only for the increase in density and shall be based upon the ratio set forth in Section 8.5.B. (Credit shall be given for land dedicated or fees paid pursuant to prior parkland Ordinance Nos. 690, 983 or 2546.) D. Comprehensive Plan Considerations The Recreation, Park and Open Space Master Plan is intended to provide the College Station Parks and Recreation Advisory Board with a guide upon which to base its recommendations. Because of the need to consider specific characteristics in the site selection process, the park locations indicated on the Plan are general. The actual locations, sizes, and number of parks will be determined when development occurs. The Plan will also be used to locate desirable park sites before development occurs, and those sites may be acquired by the City or received as donations. Park Zones are established by the City's Comprehensive Plan, in the Park and Open Space element and are configured to indicate service areas for neighborhood parks. Zone boundaries are established that follow key topographic features such as major thoroughfares, streams, and city limit lines. E. Special Fund; Right to Refund cult:Idocume-llpsprin--lllocals-lltemplchapter 9 amendment parkland.doc 7/7/05 • ORDINANCE NO. Page 9 1. All parkland fees will be deposited in a fund referenced to the park zone involved. Funds deposited into a particular park zone fund may only be expended for land or improvements in that zone. 2. The City shall account for all fees-in-lieu-of land paid under this Section with reference to the individual plat(s) involved. Any fees paid for such purposes must be expended by the City within five (5) years from the date received by the City for acquisition and/or development of a neighborhood park as defined herein. Such funds shall be considered to be spent on a first-in, first-out basis. If not so expended, the landowners of the property on the expiration of such period shall be entitled to a prorated refund of such sum, computed on a square footage of area basis. The owners of such property must request such refund within one (1) year of entitlement, in writing, or such right shall be barred. F. Parkland Guidelines and Requirements Parks should be easy to access and open to public view so as to benefit area development, enhance the visual character of the city, protect public safety and minimize conflict with adjacent land uses. The following guidelines and requirements shall be used in designing parks and adjacent development. 1. Any land dedicated to the city under this section must be suitable for park and recreation uses. The dedication shall be free and clear of any and all liens and encumbrances that interfere with its use for park purposes. The City Manager or his designee shall determine whether any encumbrances interfere with park use. Minerals may be reserved from the conveyance provided that there is a complete waiver of the surface use by all mineral owners and lessees. A current title report must be provided with the land dedication. The property owner shall pay all taxes or assessments owed on the property up to the date of acceptance of the dedication by the City. A tax certificate from the Brazos County Tax Assessor shall be submitted with the dedication or plat. ,,,,.. docume-Ilpsprin-41locals--Illemplchapter 9 amendment parkland.doc 7/7/05 ORDINANCE NO. Page 10 2. Consideration will be given to land that is in the floodplain or may be considered "floodable" even though not in a federally regulated floodplain as long as, due to its elevation, it is suitable for park improvements. Sites should not be severely sloping or have unusual topography which would render the land unusable for organized recreational activities. 3. Land in floodplains or designated greenways will be considered on a two for one basis. Two acres of floodplain or greenway will be equal to one acre of parkland 4. Where feasible, park sites should be located adjacent to greenways and/or schools in order to encourage both shared facilities and the potential co-development of new sites. 5. Neighborhood park sites should be adjacent to residential areas in a manner that serves the greatest number of users and should be located so that users are not required to cross arterial roadways to access them. 6. Sites should have existing trees or other scenic elements. 7. Detention /retention areas will not be accepted as part of the required dedication, but may be accepted in addition to the required dedication. If accepted as part of the park, the detention / retention area design must be approved by the City Manager or his designee and must meet specific parks specifications in the Manual of Neighborhood Park Improvements Standards. 8. Where park sites are adjacent to Greenways, Schools existing or proposed subdivisions, access ways may be required to facilitate public access to provide public access to parks. 9. It is desirable that fifty percent (50%) of the perimeter of a park should abut a public street. G. Consideration and Approval culc:Idocume—llpsprin—lllocals—lltemplchapter 9 amendment parkland.doc 7/7/05 ORDINANCE NO. Page 11 Any proposal considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission under this Section shall have been reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board or the City Manager or his designee as provided herein, and a recommendation given to the Commission. The Commission may make a decision contrary to the recommendation by a majority vote. H. Review of Land Dedication Requirements and Dedication and Development Fee The City shall review the Fees established and amount of land dedication required at least once every three (3) years. The City shall take into account inflation as it affects land acquisition and park development costs as well as the City's targeted level of service for parkland per one thousand population. Fees are authorized to be set by resolution of the City Council. I. Warranty Required: All materials and equipment provided to the City shall be new unless otherwise approved in advance by the City Manager or his designee and that all work will be of good quality, free from faults and defects, and in conformance with the designs, plans, specifications, and drawings, and recognized industry standards. This warranty, any other warranties express or implied, and any other consumer rights, shall inure to the benefit of the City only and are not made for the benefit of any party other than the City. All work not conforming to these requirements, including but not limited to unapproved substitutions, may be considered defective. This warranty is in addition to any rights or warranties expressed or implied by law. Where more than a one (1) year warranty is specified in the applicable plans, specifications, or submittals for individual products, work, or materials, the longer warranty shall govern. This warranty obligation shall be covered by any performance or payment bonds tendered in compliance with this Ordinance. Defective Work Discovered During Warranty Period. If any of the work is found or determined to be either defective, including obvious defects, or otherwise not in accordance with this ordinance, the designs, plans, drawings or specifications within cute:Idocume-llpsprin—lllocals—lltemplchapter 9 amendment parkland.doc 7/7/05 ORDINANCE NO. Page 12 one (1) year after the date of the issuance of a certificate of Final Completion of the work or a designated portion thereof, whichever is longer, or within one (1) year after acceptance by the City of designated equipment, or within such longer period of time as may be prescribed by law or by the terms of any applicable special warranty required by this ordinance, Developer shall promptly correct the defective work at no cost to the City. During the applicable warranty period and after receipt of written notice from the City to begin corrective work, Developer shall promptly begin the corrective work. The obligation to correct any defective work shall be enforceable under this code of ordinances. The guarantee to correct the defective work shall not constitute the exclusive remedy of the City, nor shall other remedies be limited to the terms of either the warranty or the guarantee. If within twenty(20) calendar days after the City has notified Developer of a defect, failure, or abnormality in the work, Developer has not started to make the necessary corrections or adjustments, the City is hereby authorized to make the corrections or adjustments, or to order the work to be done by a third party. The cost of the work shall be paid by Developer. The cost of all materials, parts, labor, transportation, supervision, special instruments, and supplies required for the replacement or repair of parts and for correction of defects shall be paid by Developer, its contractors, or subcontractors or by the surety. The guarantee shall be extended to cover all repairs and replacements furnished, and the term of the guarantee for each repair or replacement shall be one (1) year after the installation or completion. The one (1) year warranty shall cover all work, equipment, and materials that are part of the improvements made under this section of the ordinance. Cu lcldocume—llpsprin—Illocals—lltemplchapter 9 amendment parkland.doc 7/7/05 Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Goals & Objectives FY2005 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION (Not Prioritized) 1. Support Regional Park Initiative (Parks & Leisure, Strategy 4) QComplete appraisal of property Appraiser chosen. Appraisal received May 27, 2005. Develop action plan Meeting scheduled with US Representative Edwards staff on July 13, 2005 Tour for Parks & Recreation Advisory Board members in fall 2. Andy Anderson Arboretum at Bee Creek (Parks & Leisure, Strategy 1) Develop long-term plan for redevelopment once drainage issues are addressed ElMake additional trail improvements Install new trail markers 3. Oversee planning process for Steeplechase Park (Parks & Leisure, Strategy 2) Conduct public hearings First held on February 23rd; second hearing on March 29th; Board approval on April 12th 0 Develop Master Plan QComplete design process Design process complete. Bid project 4. Crompton Park (Parks & Leisure, Strategy 2) QComplete design process Design complete. Bid project Project pre-bid meeting held on March 3rd; bid opening on March 10th; City Council consideration April 14th Complete construction Construction underway. Begin operation and maintenance EjConduct dedication ceremony Approved by Parks&Recreation Advisory Board: October 12, 2004 Page 1 of 4 Updated:July 8, 2005 5. Veterans Park, Phase II (Parks & Leisure, Strategy 2) ElAssist with Veterans Memorial expansion project Memorial wall expansion complete November, 2004. 2 Veterans Day Ceremony November 11, 2004 Ceremony complete. Complete lighting of four existing soccer fields Project is complete Complete Phase II design plans Design contract approval at October 21, 2004 City Council meeting. In conceptual design phase - plans reviewed by VPAC, Phase II Subcommittee on February 11th. 6. Continued interaction with other City Boards (Lincoln Center, Bryan Parks Board, Conference Center, P&Z, Seniors) (Parks & Leisure, Strategy 2) ElJoint meeting with ORB Presentation and discussion of the film 'Small Urban Spaces"and discussion of park concepts for Northgate on February 1.1th. LIReport from Lincoln Center Advisory Committee Scheduled for May regular meeting EJReport from Conference Center Advisory Committee V42) 2 Report from Senior Advisory Committee Monthly updates included in Board packets. Report1d68418d-tir May 17t regular meeting. Joint meeting with Planning and Zoning Commission El Joint meeting with City Council 7. Park Land Dedication Ordinance Update (Planning & Development, Strategy 1) Review and approval of recommendations Draft ordinance prepared; discussion at Parks & Recreation Board meeting July 11th. E] Approval by City Council 8. Urban Forest Management Plan (Parks & Leisure, Strategy 1) LIRevisit or new direction? 9. Capital Improvement Projects oversight. (Parks & Leisure, Strategy 2) BZIIntergenerational Park Improvements (See CIP& Park Land Dedication Projects list for status.) Update given at the regular October meeting. Intergenerational Park Improvements construction contract Council approval on March 10th. Project underway. E] Spray Park at Lincoln Center Conceptual design complete; notice to proceed with preliminary design has been given; change order required LIDetermine use for old buildings at Lincoln Center Meeting with Lincoln Former Students held in April; funds requested for testing services Approved by Parks & Recreation Advisory Board: October 12, 2004 Page 2 of 4 Updated:July 8, 2005 0 Basketball pavilion at Jack and Dorothy Miller Park (Zone 5) Construction in progress. E1 Park Land Dedication Projects (Zone 10) 10. Needs Assessment for facilities and programs. (Parks & Leisure, Strategy 2) QConduct focus group meetings QConduct public hearings Meeting conducted on March 3rd 0 Develop survey instrument Survey underway. 0 Review and accept final report Parks Board: Council review: Meeting held with RPTS students to go over scope of the project on Nov 11th 2004 11. Park Maintenance Standards Review and Direction. (Parks & Leisure, Strategy 1) 0 First quarter standards report Report given at January 11th regular meeting 0 Second quarter stan. - rds report Report given at regular meeting along with Playground Replacement Report EiThird quarter s - lards repo 7 ❑ Fourth quarter standards report 7 ❑ Develop recommendations for improvement A v b -- (71/7 12. Southern Oaks Park (Parks & Leisure, Strategy 2) 0 Neighborhood celebration/dedication of park 0 Review park plan for additional improvements 13. Support Greenways Program (Parks & Leisure, Strategy #2) 0 Review and assist with update of Hike and Bike Master Plan Kristan Clann review of Hike and Bike Trail Plan at regular meeting of November 9, 2004 0 Review and assist with update of Greenways Master Plan QContinued support of Hike and Bike Task Force Ken Fogle update at June 14 regular Parks Board meeting. 14. City Center Project support. 0 Parks and Recreation office recommendations Approved by Parks&Recreation Advisory Board: October 12, 2004 Page 3 of 4 Updated:July 8, 2005 RIParks and open space area recommendations City Council presentations made May 12th and 26th Community Center facility recommendations Staff scheduled report to Board planned for August 15. Develop plan of action for Northgate Park. Ei Review existing Northgate Redevelopment Plan Develop recommendations for neighborhood parks 16. Explore new leisure programs and activities (Parks & Leisure, Strategy 2) El Passport program for Seniors Fall session complete Passport program for Teens El Senior Olympics Planning senior Olympics for 2006. EI International faculty and scholars picnic Held successfully at Central Park pavilion on October 26, 2004 ElDog splash day at Hallaran Pool Held on October 24, 2004. 17. Revision of By-Laws for the Board EDPrepare draft By-Laws Draft turned over for review by Legal. Draft received back from Legal, October12, 2004 RIBoard approval with revised By-Laws Review and approval at November 9th Regular meeting. El By-Laws approval by City Council Approved by Council at the February 10th meeting Approved by Parks&Recreation Advisory Board: October 12, 2004 Page 4 of 4 Updated:July 8, 2005 (*if 14 a IIII- 11111 I I I I Parks & Recreation Department Goals & Objectives FY2005 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION (Not Prioritized) • Implementation of the CIP Program • Implementation of City Council Strategic Issues • Continuation of Staff Development • Implementation of Special Projects & Programs Implementation of the CIP Program FY 2005 CIP Projects (Parks & Leisure, #2) Status: Ongoing. Monthly report given to Board El FY 2005 Park Land Dedication Projects (Parks & Leisure, #2) Status: Ongoing. Monthly report given to Board Continuation of Staff Development El Complete Management Academy Status: The Assistant Director and all superintendents have completed the course. Complete Supervisory Academy (Mollie Binion, Darrel Harvey, Cameron Parker) Status: Graduation November 16, 2004 Ej Complete Emergency Management Academy (Cheletia Thomas, Darrell Harvey) Status: Wednesdays January 12 - March 2 Complete NRPA Revenue Management School (David Gerling) Status: Peter Lamont completed the two-year course; David Gerling completed the first year. 3jComplete TRAPS Conference (Steve Beachy, Eric Ploeger, Peter Lamont, Curtis Bingham, Sheila Walker, Cheletia Thomas, Eli Williamson, Vera Solis, Zach Lowy, Carisse Depew, Scott Hooks, Geri Marsh. Status: Complete J Conduct Arbor Master Training (Parks & Leisure, #1) Status: Working on schedule for fall session E Attend the 11th Annual Southeast Texas Grounds Maintenance Conference Status: Complete Ej Attend the Texas Cooperative Extension Forestry Unit's `Arboriculture 101' (Curtis Schoessow, Scott Deffendoll, and David Pemberton) Status: Four Saturdays in January 2005 Coordinate and prepare for TRAPS Regional Workshop in Fall 2005 Status: 2005 conference scheduled for November in College Station Attend Texas Turfgrass Conference (Scott Hooks, Gary Marske, Paul Rucker, Keith Fails) Status: Conference attended, December 6th- 8th. Updated:July 8, 2005 Page 1 of 3 Implementation of City Council Strategic Issues El Acquire new cemetery site and develop Master Plan (Core Services, #1) Status: Appraisals complete; negotiations in progress Ei Continued implementation of Park Maintenance Standards (Parks & Leisure, #1) Status: FY 2004 overall 89% rating; FY 2005 goal- 90% overall; quarterly reports given to Parks Board. E Continued implementation of the Urban Forest Management Plan?? (Parks & Leisure, #1) Status: On hold pending further directions Ej Continue efforts to make parks more intergenerational (Parks & Leisure, #2) Status: Report given at October, 2004 regular meeting; construction contract approved on March 10th and under construction. E] Review leisure service programs ( Parks & Leisure, #2) Status: Softball program report October 12, 2004. Fall "Senior Passport"program complete; cricket league proposal received. 0 Pursue cooperative efforts with the City of Bryan on joint programming (Parks & Leisure, #2) Status: Planning Senior Olympics for 2006; Men's D State softball tournaments July15-17 2005 0 Develop Veterans Park & Athletic Complex, Phase II (Parks & Leisure, #2) Status: Design contract approval at October 21, 2004 City Council meeting; In conceptual design phase - plans reviewed by VPAC Phase II Subcommittee on February 11th. 1:1 Promote performing arts (Parks & Leisure, #3) Status: 2005 starlight concert series underway. El Continued implementation of regional planning and development initiative (Parks & Leisure, #4) Status: Funding approval in BVSWMA FY 2005 budget; Appraisal complete; meeting scheduled with Congressman Chet Edwards July 13th. 0 Develop action plan for Northgate Park (Parks & Leisure, #2) Status: On hold pending staff discussions E Develop Master Plan for Steeplechase (Parks & Leisure, #2) Status: First public hearing held on February 23rd, Second on March 29th, Board review scheduled for May regular meeting. El Implement Arboretum improvement plan (Parks & Leisure, #2) Status: Implementation of Special Projects and Programs 0 Implementation of the remote sports lighting system (Parks & Leisure, #2) Status: Complete; New soccer lights will include Sky Logic 2 Continue implementation of automated registration software (RecWare) Status: In progress; software installed; testing completed; training completed and software in use. E] Conduct benchmark survey of similar cities Status: On-line survey completed January 27th. Results collected from all Big 12 Conference Schools. Results will be received by all involved. 0 Continue investigation of the feasibility for NRPA departmental accreditation Status: Inventory with current level of compliance complete 0 Continue investigation of the feasibility of implementing a Donations Program for the Department Updated:July 8, 2005 Page 2 of 3 Status: Draft program complete E,Conduct Program and Facilities Needs Assessment (Parks & Leisure, #2) Status: Agreement with TAMU's RPTS department approved; February - focus groups complete; public hearing held on March 3rd; Parks Board focus group on March 8th; all focus groups complete; survey in progress Acquire and implement AED's at select PARD facilities Status: Funding approved in FY 2005 budget; acquisition complete; training held April 1-2. Acquire and install Wolf Pen Creek street banners (Economic Development, #1) Status: Banner design complete; bid awarded for 36 steel banners; signs received; installation pending until light poles can be painted. Ei Facilitate Cricket program (Parks & Leisure, #2) Status: Facilitate start of user group; site identified for facility; organization of group in progress El Northgate Music Series (Parks & Leisure, #3) Status: Initial funding approved El Investigate Lincoln Center staffing possibilities Status: Reorganization with existing positions complete. Two Assistant Center Supervisors in place as of February 15t. 0 Decide what should be done with old buildings at Lincoln Center Status: Staff met with Lincoln Former Students in April; funding requested for testing services. Updated:July 8, 2005 Page 3 of 3 STRATEGIC PLANS IMPLEMENTATION CALENDAR APRIL 2005 - JUNE 2005 STATEMENT SUBJECT TEAM APRIL MAY Core services,: Provide EffectiveSteve Moss Design firm gathers input from JUNE j r , Cemetery Committee completes S; Cemetery,Services Rier staff,Cemetery Committee and proposed operational issues for new the community ON HOLD site.Presentation to City Mgr.for ljetarL., ", Integration with financial software approval. ON HOLD Core Services Technology Services i S,1 ,,` ' '" Davkt Begin begins. accepting credit cards., Core Services City Marketing Plan °'' ,. Core Services Employee S 3 Communication Pla•n Core Services „Advisory Board S 3 '. Communication Core Services . Cooperation with. -S 5 TxDOT for, Landscaping Capital Projects' Core Services .Employee S 6 ' Recognition Systems Core Services Performance $;$ ” Evaluation Systems g. , Steve, Present results of 20.quarter,park' Parks&Leisure Parks Maintenance Rl,surds, .ma,ntenant swveys tca Parks • 5' Services Standards Pass s and Recreation Board ", .: 311 'Parks&Leisure Urban Forest "> Steve, Services ''''' `.Management pian Ross 51' ,�. Parks&Leisure Greenwa 1GBikewa , ,O oy r nspe0taon I is n at4 Services Y ,l4peauiarrdnat Plans i'f - Parks&Leisure Public Appearance.; Services issues f 31. Parks&Leisure Steve,ftic, Cor trllC#ion t�®gins ; Inter enerational `" Under oonstructioit' Services Parks Pete V.aavld ''' '''1 '''''' ''P'•ogrem evaluations due Survey in progress Parks&,Leisure Leisure Service Steve, Division 8'1'Program Evaluations Services $2 Programs Peter t r Complete David G ,, •Parks&Leisure Planking urtde+way"for Senior Cooperative Efforts Steve, Games Services ,.. with the City of Bryan ,PeterL., S 2 David G ;' Parks&Leisure Veterans Park Steve,R1cr Services y Phased Deveiopment' :;Curtls Ross, $2 Peter'L Rive-year Parks Parks 'Leisure Capital improvement Steve;trio, Services Projects Pete'tii, S 2 iarirflVLi NOTE: Shaded items have been completed. Parks Leisure i rs tied at vRac and s situ SNices„ . > Soder Fief nL1911t- Lights 5 2 direction F Parks&,' Leisure Activities That 14�Ever Rod Run June 11 Services enhance&Serve the;,': S 7 ' Commun1ty Parks&Leisure �r., Star girt Series begins promote the StarltttSenes ends Serrvices Apo arming Arte S!3 Parks;&Leisurei Serrrioes�� Strategic Piace rnent S . of Pubiic'Art Parks c Leisure Appraisal c MPA propeity in Services Regional Planning& Sieve,141c1 Gomes. rimes County Complete. S 4 Development 1�arks`Board `initiatives Planning&, Update Park Land Steve, `: Development Dedication Ordinance: Ale SI Economic "P mote Commercial:, Development Development in the S 1 WPC Dtstricfi.. STRATEGIC PLANS IMPLEMENTATION CALENDAR JULY 2005 - SEPTEMBER 2005 STATEMENT SUBJECT TEAM JULY -Care SBrvices„ '` �� AUGUST SEPTEMBER Provide ffectiv@ S�feYB �k , Design firm delivers Master Plan Construction to begin next month on S'1 Cemetery services / &Phase I construction docs. Phase I. Staff develops FY 06 budget ON HOLD requirements for construction and operations for Phase I ON HOLD Core Services Technology Services' " « ` Integration between RecWare and S'i David G HTE complete Credit cards accepted at all sites Care Servloes City Marketing Plan S°3 Core'SerViCes Employee • S 3 -'''Communication Plan e Core Services , "Advisory Board S 3 Communication Core Services. Cooperation with S 5 TxDOT far Landscaping Capital Projects' Core Services S 6 "Recognition"Systems Core Services, Performance S 6 Evaluation'Systems ; . darks Maintenance ' ? '"'F"Steve Present results of 3b quarter park Parks&Leisure' Services Rk,Curtis,"",, maintenance surveys to Parks& Standards Rt>sS Board. Parks&Leisure- urban Forest Staves Services; Management Plan Foss S1 "Par$ Laisrvk es ure Greenway f Bikeway S 1 Plans Parks&Leisure Public Appearance, Services 2 Issues S.1 Parks&LeisureSteve Ric, Intergenerational ! Complete intergenerational features Services . II Devid. installation S 2. Parks -fol!‘ fi Needs Assessment Report To Report to Parks Board Parks&Leisure Leisure Service Stairs, City Council For Consideration . Services Programs,4 Peters,., MOVED TO OCTOBER S 2 David G. r. Parks&Leisure p Mens Slow Pitch State Softball Services Coo erative Efforts $te'e, Tournament S 2 ; with the City of Bryan Peters.,. .; David G Parks&Leisure Complete Phase II design Services ` Veterans Park Steve,Rir Phage ii Development Curtis,Ffass�,i.' S 2Peter!. Five»year.Parks Complete intergenerational features. Parks&Leisure Car it l'Imprpvemen{ „#eve,Rio, Services` Aare V prrl�eCtE` , + Complete VPAC Phase II design S 2 DavidzW. Bid Project NOTE: Shaded items have been completed. Parks&Leisure Soccer Field Light, Services Direction S2 • Parks&Leisure A,ctivities that Services „ S Enhance&"Servethe N ; Cammunitr Parks.&LeisureiPromote the N. Serlrices Performing Arts;` ' S3 Parks&LeisureStrategic t iacement Services • of Public Art S3 Parks&Leisure Regional Planning& Steve,'Ric, Services " Development Parks•-Bo• ard:, S 4 , Initiatives Planning& Update Park Land < Steve,v Report/update to Board at regular Development Dedication Ordinance', Ric July meeting •Economic Promote Commercial .' Development Development in the, S 1 " : WPC District " pARks & - RECREATION -- College Station Park System Inventory COI.IEgE STATION o i- w a W = oz = ww vyw ¢ ¢ _, a F J o o ti w a Q ¢ - LLLLa w = z W = m � < 7i o a 0 PARK NAME ¢ ow h Q Q V r° 2 0 < d Q o ti a a a o a i o ', m 2 2 m y a R.R. OTHER ' DERSON' N'"'''',- 8.94 -D ...0 ...0 , *r'• a•1 ,'+r a BEE CREEK C 26.50 D 0 0 1 14 •3 • •1/4 BILLIE MADELEY' 3• v 2 04 • 0 237 _: N � .,5.14' D „� . , BRISON N 9.20 D • 01/3 BROTHERS POND , N 18.12 D"' • -,` • • 10 3 2 -'+M. 1►):PN. • 0112 •`. •1f2 �:? . CASTLEGATE N 8.26 D • 02 •2 • 0 3P r•1/3 • CEMETERY. 18.50 D ✓.:., 2 . ., '''4'•- ., $tat®HiStGrtC'!'. CENTRAL C 47.20 D 0 •2 0 1 y 110 01 • •2FP • 0 1 01 •3 04% 0 2 • CONFERENCE CENTER ' 2.3�. D 'Ci 1-. 297 • Park Office CY MILLER M 2.50 D • •1 , •` *FP '' T" 76'" .. 'ParkAnnex •1/3 0 Police DA"ANDY"ARBORETUM. , A, ;1,1.00, 04..j'''' EASTGATE M 1.80 D • V ' 0 EDELWEISS ' ,N.','' 12.30 D x ' • ,� i 002'.,‘,'•;, •112 "�+11`', ,F,; f. '.�P< ! 10 EDELWEISS GARTENS N 7.74 U EMERALD FOREST N . 4.58 D : .•2; 01 , ;' ,„04' •113 `01/2 4'' ':' GABBARD _ N 10.70 D • •1 •1 • •FP •1/3 F F F GEORGIE K.FITCH ' ; , N 11.30 D ' •. , •2., .1 .1IIP" ' ;• ' .'0,1 P° °F HENSEL(TAMU) C 29.70 D 0 02 0 3 14 • •1/3 • 70 TAMU JACK&'DOROTHYMILLER ' N -10.00 .0. :' • , 2 • ,.f:',""1",. ' 41/3 "• .'r•1 .., °, ' ,, tF JOHN CROMPTON N 15.28 U LEMONTREE' N_ 15.40, D '-0' •3'f s I1; '• T; •,,.' •3/4 01/2 01:;::' 30 LICK CREEK R 515.50 D • •1.8 60 LIONS, . M` ' 1.50 ''D 03 =01 '.. 01/2 ,, , „ ' .10 LONGMIRE N 4.16 D 12 LUTHER"JONES. M 1.80; D y 1 Ikf,° MERRY OAKS N 4.60 D 102 •2 • • •1/3 •1 OAKS '- , ','":14- 7.50„ 'D "0 0 •7 •I ;•.'3 , ".111/4 0 1 67, ,40- PARKWAY M 1.90 D •1 •2 • PEBBLE CREEK , N 10.20, D '',77,• , v 2" • ,.•3 :•'i .;.,..4;'''.''' '.`+1/2 -,I1 F,0 F F 6''.; RAINTREE N 13.00 D • 12 02 • •1/3 F • RICHARD CARTER 'N' ' '' 7.14'- 0 '-'''.;,,-;,.±? . .,i wl , •„'" ," = •. " state Historic SANDSTONE N 15.21 D • •1 • '1/3 • •1 F F F 48 SOUTHEAST C 64.00 U, SOUTHERN OAKS N 14.47 D • • 02 • •1/3 •1 SOUTHWEST. N' 4.78 U xt SOUTHWOOD ATHLETIC C 44.70 D 0 0 02 • 0 2 0 5 0 6 0 4 • O 544 Teen Center STEEPLECHASE N 9.00, "UVK ;.:11,,,', . THOMAS C 16.10 D 0 0 15 •4 • 0 3/4 • 02 F 0 2 0 27 UNIVERSITY" , N' 10.20"'_ {/, , x P,`''' '414-'1;''' VETERANS ATHLETIC RA 150.00 D 0 • 02•4„,,0 2 406, 0 Vet Memorial W.A.TARROW(W.Smith), C 21«26 D 7o., '<.{)',,, „• 10 3 -''..,,i'=.101;13..:,1:1 0'..2 F '' ''0',"Y '0 3 206 • sate" lrtc WESTFIELD N 4.29 U WINDWOOD M , .,1.37 " D ,gi 42, •1I 10",_,'"''' WOLF PEN CREEK C 19.49 D 0 0 0 •1 01 • W 03/4 36 0 Amphitheater WOODCREEK N l 6.60: D '„,',.*21i".,(3.1 '''',, 51 `01/3 . ',01/2 4,..; 0 WOODLAND HILLS N 13.91 U PARK SUMMARY* QUANTITY PARK TYPE TOTAL ACREAGE 6 Mini 10,87 C - Community Park R - Regional Park 27 Neighborhood 251.52 D - Developed RA - Regional Athletic Park 8 Community 256.25 FP - Fishing Pond State Historic - State Marker on site 1 Regional Nature 515.50 M - Mini Park U - Undeveloped 1 Regional Athletic 150.00 N - Neighborhood Park W - Wetlands P - Pond(Non-fishing) F - Open Practice Fields 43 Total Parks-1,192.46 Total Park Acreage * 0 - Lighted Facilities • - Unlighted Facilities Hensel Park,Cemetery,and Conference Center are not included in acreage totals. 0./Parks Inventories/Park System Inventory.doc Revised July 7,2005 PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT& PARK LAND DEDICATION PROJECTS FY'05 July 6, 2005 Ca•ital Im•rovement Pro"ects Capital Improvement Project Project Completion Projects Status Manager # Budget Source Funding ate Final � � �° � � �, Expected/Actual Cost Southeast Community,Park Two-Acre Purchase Comp eta M 4McAuliffe $40000, v 4,04 Gen Fund 12/04.,, $40 000 Eastgate Improvements Com lete avid • 0270 p D PK0404 ,$40 0 0, Brazos Beautiful 8/04° ti/04'.. 3, 4 $44,270: Wolf Pen Creek Trees Complete Pete $12,e00 Gen Fuad FY:'04 11!01104 11)01 $6,360 Wolf Peri Creek Signs Complete ;.bete WP0400 $70,500, General Fund FY 514 4 9104', . 4/04 34,500- Central Park Soccer Field Light Design Complete Pete PK0406 $20,000 General Funds 10/04 , Krenek Crossing Landscaping Complete Pete GG002 $20,000 , City Centre 11/04 1/05 15,606 Lick Creek Park Bike,Rocks,Benches,&Slabs 'Complete Pete PI(0069 $7,000 '98 Bond 12/31/04 , 1/05 $6,650 Lincoln Center Expansion/Improvements Complete Ric - P1<0319 $984,000 CDBG Funds 3/05 1/05 $818,448 Greens Prairie Rd Landscaping&Irrigation Design) Complete :. David ST0214 $60,000 Street project Fund 4/05 3/28 . $80,000 Parkway Park 1 Complete Pete - P1(0409 $50,000 '03 G.O.+Zone 2 - 3/05 3/25 $44,795 Central Park Soccer Lights Complete Pete P1(0406 $285,000 General Fund 6/05 4/05 $224,174 Rock Prairie Rd Medians Landscape Complete Pete St9923 $40,000 , '98 Bond 3/05 3/16 $23,903 Thomas Pool Collector Tank Repair Complete Ric P1(0528 $20,000 , '05 General Fund 5/05 5/15/05 $270,470 VPAC Soccer Lights Complete , Pete PK0511 $400,000 , General Fund 5/05 , 5/12/05 $10,819 Veterans Park Phase II In Design Ric P0501 $6,925,000 '03 Bond 10/07 To Bid Lincoln Playground July 26 Pete PK0533 $50,000 '05 Gen.fund 10/05 Steeplechase Park Development In Design David Pk0502 $315,000 Community Dev. 12/05 W.A.Tarrow Spray Park In Design Ric PK0503 $245,000 Community Dev. Cemetery Land Acquisition Pending Land Contract Ross GG9905 $275,000 '98 G.O. Unknown Jack&Dorothy Miller Park Basketball Court Cover Under Construction Pete PK0512 $175,000 '05 General Fund 9/05 WPC Multipurpose Building In Design Ric $700,000 WPC T.I.F. 5/06 Intergenerational Park Additions Under Construction David PK0513 $310,000 03 Bond 9/05 Economic Development Business Park Sign Under Construction Pete GG0302 $50,000 Business Center Fund 5/05 North ate Restrooms No status Ric $300,000 FY'05 I-Intergenerational Project CompleAteal 14," Under Construction 3 Under Contract 0 Pending Contracts 1 Bids Received 0 Out to Bid/Re-Bid 1 In Design 3 Pending Land Contract 1 On Hold 0 No status 1 24 Park Land Dedication Pro"ects Park Land Dedication Project Project Funding Co Datetion Final Projects Prioritized Status Manager # Budget Source __-- ZONE 1 -$203,143 11ectedi Cost North.ate Park Ac•uisition On Hold === Zone 1 Funds ZONE 2-$76,319 ---- Richard Carter Park,$Idevvaiks Zone 2& $21,435 Com.tete _. Pete PK0411 $20 000 Re•tacement 10/31/04 Richard Carter Park.Landscape&Irrigation Corn.Iete Pete PK0520 ,15 000 Park Zone 2 6/05 8/3/05 $15 883 Thomas Park Track Com•tete David = 'Pk $110 000 Zone 2 Funds 5/05 6121 $87 596 ZONE 3-$82,520 _----- Central Park Life Trail In Desi.n David ----- Central Pond Sailfish Walk Com.lete David PK0405 48,500 Zone 3 Funds 10/15/04 12/3/04 $46,690 ZONE 4-$22,239 -_----- Raintree Im•rovements Concrete Walks Zone 4 + In Desi•n Pete NA $p $ts,000'98 98 BBoond Windwood Im•rovements Concrete Walks In Desi.n Pete NA $0 Zone 4 Funds ZONE 5-$25,065 Jack&Doroth Miller Park Trail L titin® C"om.1et9 =Pete P 040 $55 000 Zone'S Funds , 16/04 1105 $45 862 ZONE 6-$88,697 -_----- Southwest Park Develo.ment On Hold Pete/David _ $90,000 Zone 6 Funds Lemontree Park Disc Golf Com.lete Pete V PK0527 $5 000 Zone 6 Funds 5/15/05 04/15/05 $3 725 Gabbard Park Sidewalk I On Hold David NA $0 Zone 6 Funds ZONE 7-$233,648 -■-_---_- John Crompton Park Development 1 Under Construction Pete PK9803 $710,000 Zone 7 Funds Oct. 1/05 ZONE 8-$41,679 -_ ---- ZONE 9-$34,389 ---_- ZONE 10-$175,978 Desi.n Edelweiss Gartens On Hold Pete/David ZONE 11 -$41,643 -_---_- Pebble Creek Park improvements/Tot Playground 1 Cam.Iete .' Pete P1(0403 $38 500 Zone 11 Funds 11/04 12/04 $38 325 ZONE12-$ 5 $ ,===--- ZONE 13-$58080 --- I-Intergenerational Project Park Land Dedication Summary Completed 7 Under Construction 1 Under Contract o Bids Received 0 Pending Contracts 0 Out to Bid 0 In Design 3 Pending Land Acquisition 0 On Hold 4 Total 15 O:/Projects/CIP/CIP&Park Land Ded Project List.doc Page 2