Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
09/12/1996 - Regular Agenda Packet - Parks Board
City of College Station Parks and Recreation Board Regular Meeting September 12, 1996 -- 7:00 p.m. City Hall - Training Room 1101 Texas Avenue South AGEA 1. Appointment of Advisory Committee Members a. Lincoln Center Advisory Committee b. Conference Center Advisory Committee 2. Adjourn City of College Station ,‘ pARks & , Parks &Recreation Department , gr, , RECREATION Post Office Box 9960 , , cCollege Station, Texas 77842-9960 oaiE STATION it i . (409)764-3 7 73 September 4, 1996 Dear Board Member: The next regular board meeting has been moved back two days from Tuesday to - Thursday. It wilt be held in conjunction with the next Council meeting which is scheduled for Thursday, September 12, at 5:00 p.m. in Council Chambers. This meeting will be a closed session due to the discussion of the athletic park site. Dinner will be provided due to the time of the meeting. ...._ Also, you are encouraged to attend the first Public Hearing on the Comprehensive Plan which Will be held on Wednesday, September 11, at 7:00 pm. in Council Chambers. If you have any questions regarding the meetings, please call me at 764-3414. Thank you! Sincerely, f / i(tdeitiApj tryik_. Bridyii ett George CPS l Staff Assistant, Parks &Recreation Department ..,,,..,.. ,:.,,,,i0.0m-x-%;:-,I..,.:i.::::.•x•mizNia:1::::,,...„ .....:'."::.: rt4WWWWIMAMIINItammemmism . ..,:,.. ozw. vcs: , 0:,:,.„„!.„,:;:::,:;.,:::;:::,:m.m:,:,:;:;:;:;:;::;,;:;„:,;;;;:;:;*,000.;:;:::,:;:,:,:;„:;:;„,,,„:„ ROBERT E. LELAN D Head Coach College StationlBryan Aquatics 1028 Walton Drive College Station,Texas Telephone 409-696-4142 Steve Linda Dana Vera Over the past year I have greatly appreciated the participation with you and your staff. Many times you have gone to bat to bring on board the College Station/Bryan Swim Club I do not see the USSro am as a new program because of my years of aquatics in this p �' community both as an athlete and professional. My hope is that I can serve program needs asq p art of the "aquatics family" and cooperate as programs f n d their balance. United States Swimming is simply developing age group swimmers. It can encourage the league swimmer, support the high school swimmer,participate with the masters swimmer, and link the local programs to the state and national. The community is where this type of program belongs and I am pleased that our program has come back to the City of College Station. As I read thep ole taken from our local teens, I see that swimming is a popular item. I note that there is a lot of interest at the 7th-8th grade level. We have targeted the 4th and 5th grades for years and we have a lot of interest but I think these kids are just looking for a stable program as a prep for there high school years. We have the talent and opportunity to produce conditions for these athletes that will fit their needs. It will take some time to accept the extra burden oflearning and success. I know you have made many concessions, as I have,but a "team effort" will be successful Communications,patience and support will encourage the local swimming structure to grow and the conditions will find a balance. Thanks for all you do. Coach Bob Leland .:Y'::.Y•:.Y•:r.YY v Y:.Y'.titi'r•:'..':.r':.•.::.YY.•:.r•r':.•.•• YY YY•r CSBA L•: A....m.......... S1S.....{......•............................ ....ri r ril.r r.t..........•..•r..r r.r r.......S.....1:'TICS�.S.....•..L.:.._...•.....•..t•:.St•.L•.•.SL••�:.S:•:::rLr:.::.•L•r1•:.t•:.t::L: L ._......_....... t :. •11'rSSSSY:rS':.�.S t•.t•:.SL•.LLLS..SY.1•:rL��:rlre t•::.t•:.S•.S•.S:•:••SiLSL•:SSS•::•:.S•:.t ,, Abur, Ali &Aysen Murat 3208 Sunflower Trail Co lege Station TX 77845 696-1596 email possible©TAMU Adams, Lynn Amy 1701 Brookhollow Drive Bryan TX 77802 779-0290 696-1674;775-9025 Aikman, Grace &Larry Katherine 1706 Austin Co lege Station TX 77845 693-8697 845-0478 Baker, Kimel &James Jessica& Michael James 1119 Ashburn Ave. Co lege Station TX 77840 696-7185 845-7057 Baldauf, Karen &Jack Ryan & Brandan 16505 Riva Ridge Rd. Co lege Station D( 77845 690-6962 776-2872K;845-9297J Beladi, Kathy& Michael Mahtaj &Joevan P.C . Box 2031 Co lege Station TX 77841 693-5504 845-5337 her work Bergbreiter, Dave &Lynn Amy& Sarah 10134 Dogwood Trail Co lege Station TX 77845 846-4198 Boutton, Tom &Janet Kelly 1034 Rose Circle Co lege Station TX 77840 764-1676 Burgess, Suzie Kab & Brenner 827 Dominik Co lege Station TX 77840 696-4858 Capps, K.S. & Cathy Nikki 1805 Song Sparrow Co lege Station TX 77845 690-0226 Champ, Lew& Linda Shaye & Chelsea 1303 Haley Place Co lege Station D( 77845 764-9049 823-5451 lew;776-5636 li Crithfield, Eva &Richard Laurie 2904 Brothers Blvd. Co lege Station TX 77845 696-7162 845-2167 hisW Crompton, John & Liz Joanne 1000 Rose Circle Co lege Station TX 77840 696-0825 Cross, William &Janet Lee& Katie 121 Royal Bryan D( 77801 846-7515 Crow, JoAnn & Rick John & Kelly 1106 Westover Co lege Station TX 77840 696-1409 845-1068hisW Daniels, Chris& Lee Marie 1001 Oakhaven Cir. Co lege Station TX 77840 846-7943 845-3726iee;846-8771chri Delvo, Sam & Barb Kristy 128 Apollo Drive Bismark ND 58501 846-4161 (Wyler) 701-667-1333 his;701-32 Deslarzes, Ken & Lori Simone 1105 Dominik Drive Co lege Station TX 77840 764-6110 847-9296 ken Dew, Tom &Cindy Stephanie 1011 James Parkway Co lege Station TX 77840 696-4449 845-5511T;764-55740 Downey, Jay & Linda Jacob&Jerry 3943 Blue Jay Ct. Co lege Station TX 77845 690-6573 409-825-4250him;409-56 Duarte Alejandra Elbel, David & Bonnie Brian 1106 Neal Pickett Drive Co lege Station TX 77840 693-0587 Evans, Donald &Jolene Hillary 3701 Forestwood Bryan TX 77801 775-5682 Felderhoff, Chris&Sandy Kelly 1817 Quail Run Co lege Station TX 77845 696-6728 845-6000 Fink, Bob& Debbie Barbara & Doug 900 Lazy Lane Bryan TX 77802-3730 846-0021 Franco, Victor P.O. Box 10069 Co lege Station TX 77842 775-3406 Age 30;693-0257office French, Flip 9 Commons Lobby, K 436 TAMU Co lege Station TX 77840-9522 847-3291 Fred&Diane French 505- Fulton, Ron &Taffy Katie 3101 Missouri Bryan TX 77803 778-0199 845-8908 his;776-4932 he Gardinali, Piero & Martha Carlos& Mariana 3206 Wildrye Co lege Station TX 77845 696-4115 Giner, Oscar& Margaita Sara 1 800 Song Sparrow Co lege Station TX 77845 690-6388 Glover, Diane & Charles James 4742 Renwick Drive Bryan TX 77802 776-1584 Goodall, Deborah &Gary Ann & Becca 11667 North Dowling Road 'Co lege Station TX 77845 693-2862 Hair, Beth 220 lnlow Bryan TX 77801 846-6729 Hall, Ken &Frieda Keith & Krysta 1401 Mil'creek Court Co lege Station TX 77845 696-3579 Hann, Roy & Martha Heather Eileen 1300 Walton Co lege Station TX 77840 696-7414 846-9096 herW;845-3012 Heddy, Merrill &Greta Benjamin 5101 Leonard Road#121 Bryan TX 77807 822-9243 Hermann, Lonnie &Jeanette Daniel, Lauren, Allison &John 205 McNair Navasota TX 77868 409-825-7588 409-825-6444W Holt, Thom & Diane Robert&Meredith 2903 Colton Place College Station TX 77845 693-1133 Hudgens, Randy & Kathy Rachel & Katherine 1210 Walton Drive College Station TX 77840 764-7573 Jones, Linda &Dan Bryan &Allan 2712 Normand Drive College Station TX 77840 693-8660 Kezunovic, Mladen &Vesna Milica 3210 Sunflower Trail College Station TX 77845 696-8623 845-7509 hisW Kirby, Jim &Judi Cara 1003 Carmel Place College Station TX 77845 693-6381 776-0750 both work;Gil 2 Lane, Becky&Fred Michael & Daniel 2817 Adrienne Drive College Station TX 77845 693-8265 764-5590her Leland, Bob& Mia Kacie & Brad 514 Southwest Parkway West College Station TX 77845 696-4142 Liles, Ben &Cathy Benjamin &Garrison 1804 Sabine Court College Station TX 77840 693-3449 ............ Wednesday,August 2 v)6 Page 1 CSBA : :: • {. `1:x51• •LS iYr. vrti. .: vvv r1Y.Y•.v :vti1'.'.YYVYr'..:'. '•Y+. • s vY:VYv.i.'..i•• is.•.•.' :' . s0 t r1 S Yv . 4 : : :. 1vr Linger, Mike& Nancy Gayle 1 502 Feather Run College Station TX 77845 693-1 461 Liu, Jinggao&Zhenhong Jin Howard Liu 814 Azalea Court College Station TX 77840 764-6996 260-9232 hisW;845-7010 Loupot, Judson & Phyllis Sara Lynn 2847 Oakside Drive Bryan TX 77802 846-7345 224-1339P;846-6312J;84 Love, Marshall Suite#6 2105 South College Bryan TX 77801 775-1906 Manning, Mary Hohl/Timothy Evan 1106 Glade College Station TX 77840 696-1964 845-1934hisW;776-2872h Mathews, Mike &Penne Mindy 1503 Lemontree College Station TX 77840 764-7626 Mills, Gail &Robert Katie& Sarah 1004 Huntington Drive College Station TX 77845 693-4188 260-9665 work;696-6885 Mitchell, Lawrence &Jeanne Andrew 2100 Briar Oaks Bryan TX 77802 846-2673 Moores, Greg/Margrit Gwendolyn &Silas 1104 Goode Street College Station TX 77840 693-5642 845-1011 Morgan, Betty &Bill John & David 3505 Oak Hill Bryan TX 77802 846-0520 Nelson, Al &Joyce Catherine 1397 Harpers Ferry College Station TX 77845 690-6966 Orozco, Cathie& Daniel Alison & Hannah 3006 Lodgepole College Station TX 77845 696-3560 Owens, Dave &Mimi Will 2729 San Felipe College Station TX 77845 764-3137 845-0910 Pace, Lila & Gandy, Charles Aleah P.Q. Box 10051 College Station TX 77842 764-6696 Parkhurst, Jon T. 401 Harvey Road, Suite 262 College Station TX 77840 696-2615 Pradhan, Dhiraj & Lynn Meera &Shara 4901 Firestone Drive College Station TX 77845 690-6539 Rau, Sarah &Wade Molli &Maggi 603 Jackson Brenham TX 77833 409-836-6653 409-836-6644;409-836-44 Rhodes, Bobby&Sonya Gillian & Katie 1021 James Parkway College Station TX 77840 693-3926 7643702 work Rice, John &Joanne Nicholas& Lisa 50 Presidents Lane Quincy MA 02169 Rodriguez, Yolanda & Robert Valentina 1525 East 29th St., Suite 512 Bryan TX 77802 823-1630 845-0077 W:his Rose, Bill & Kathy Billy 2906 Missouri Avenue Bryan TX 77803 778-7283 Ruoff, Lynn &Dub Brett 3733 McCullough Road College Station TX 77845 690-0060 Sahm, David &Janice Jessica & Rachel 1017 James Parkway College Station TX 77840 764-7816 862-4311 his ;845-8066 Sams, Alan &Gretchen Mitchell 2811 Woodmeadow Drive Bryan TX 77802 268-0734 862-1518;224-2561 Schueckler, Leslie& Larry Alan 15206 Post Oak Bend College Station TX 77845 • 690-8540 7645411 leslie;846-2775 Schultz, Phil & Pamela Justin &Jessica 4582 Cricket Pass College Station TX 77845 690-6485 Sen, Arunabha &Swati Abheek 8703 Sandstone College Station TX 77845 693-7305 Sheffield, Susan W. Rebecca 3122 Camelot, #22 Bryan TX 77802 776-0797 Simpson, Jeff&Cindy Christopher& Natalie 2810 Arroyo Court North College Station TX 77845 693-9210 693-9210her;845-3799hi Slowey, Mall & Michelle Shane&Alison 604 Coachlight College Station TX 77845 696-6881 Sproule, Michelle Leigh P.O. Box 8824 College Station TX 77844 775-5545 Stagner, Wendy Wood &Brian Dylan &Garrett 2809 Brothers Boulevard College Station TX 77845 693-0738 Sutton, Mark& Margaret Sarah 2411 Delee, Suite 16 Bryan TX 77802-0656 774-4380 847-8590 MarkFax Tuttle, Kenny& Carole Michelle 528 Scott Big Spring TX 79720 915-634-9334 (old)409-542-8081 kenny; Valdez-Flores, Ciriaco/Nancy Martin & Natalia 3506 Regal Row Ct. College Station TX 77845 694-2945 845-1735herW;846-2743 Van Erman, Kent& Lynn Lauren 1204 Tracy Lee Brenham TX 77833 409-830-1409 409-836-7911 kent;409-8 Vaughn, Tad &Anjel Chrissy &Jack&Joe 1504 Quail's Nest College Station TX 77845 696-1262 Watkins, William & Geneva Kevin 3013 Candy Lane Bryan TX 77803 778-8732 Weems, Heather 1301 Barthelow, Suite 7C College Station TX 77840 694-1089 Virginia/Charles(713)498- Wiggins, Caspar&Connie Laura 4581 Cricket Pass College Station TX 77845 690-0517 845-3784 Wilson, Mike& Becky Erin P.O. Box 10270 College Station TX 77842 693-9850 693-7815 work; 777-9342 Wooten, Philip 410 South Texas Avenue College Station TX 77840 268-4449 Mary&Stephen Wooten Yen, John &Taiyu (Michelle) Philip&Angela 2908 Bolero College Station TX 77845 696-3621 845-5466hisW Zawieja, Cynthia& David Danica 1207 Broadmoor Drive Bryan TX 77802 846-3713 Wednesday,August" 196 Page 2 ........... -----'''''."''""'••••••••••••••••,•:•••••••••••••••.........:• .., • • ... ..,.:..........,,.............„. .. ;1 r i ..,-, • ; f _ Fr�� ......:!::"...1:.:.!..::.: ::(,..k".((. '' H: - ''''::.:::•':::•:: :.":... ...,......:1:.'.•;:..::':::,...........:...H.,. ..::::::.:::::1::::::::::.;:-....... f, t t i ,,,,..........17(._*„.,,4 [:'•''...i!;:i''''...11'''''''''::::5.::::::::::::.:::..H.: ) ‘ ''0'-i.... : .,•:•"....,f1 .......... ....:17::::::::.:.:( ...f • ...................*.':.'...'.'.....:••••:':....'.:.' ...............•.:::','''••• . ' y p •Z Z;t�R n1G [ka. e ai 4 s 1.y ;¢Ij::' • j. A,. .....:.:.:•:„#• • .'.:• . • .. ...:::IS • ...... .. l'...,:......:1:::;.............i.,',...,....';...................::.:::•...:•••••••::....... -:-. . l'••• THE..........,,:!•C.............::Q... ..... .T...'........,,•:•......tp...........E........,••$........: STATION .. . . ' . ..• •• ......„,...„.„...,..,......,..,.............:................ :,&:.... CITY . ...............4.,..............L.:::,............2.,.......::.:.....,.::.:::::,......,........ ............. .................:,...............,.......: .... . .......:... . OF COLLEGE:` STATION,: ..................::::::.....i........:,...........::,..... 1 AS ..........••...,.....•......„........• .... .. ,... .... ...... .. •......•..•:.:......:.....,..........f .........................„........ :.......,:................:,.."..f. .............:::::::::•!...,......................;!................::•.......:........:::::..y..... ......:!....;:......,....i........:."...,....,:,.........,.....................................,.......,:::::,:::•••:......ii.,....;:::i.........,........:4•.:(-....:.......,::::„.:::iii...,.....,.......„.............:,:,,.......::::.::11...,.................,••,,,.,..............:.................:. ' .. ... ..:.... ..::::.'.:.. .......:..: 1 ,.....).........H..... ... . .............................................,....„.;•,...,......................,.........:::::::.,:„.........:..„.......;:„„:,...::........,.....„.....:::•;•::„.....,.. , . AUGUST PREPARED BY: • HELLMUTH, OBATA + KASSABAUM INC.........2.....'.....;...............::::::......,:i i ........... ......... .DALE ► A5 •TEX ■ AS S ARTQN-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES INC. • , DALLAS ■ TEXAS'`;; CAMP L7 R ES5 ER`& MCKEE, INC. • DA i.:;'::•::::.•.':•,.'•:.,:.:'..i::':•.4i'•.,.ij...?:::;::' .• i ..... .....:.::::..:::::.... .. L LAS■ TEXAS 1 . ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Mayor and Council Lynn Mcillhaney - Mayor (1996 - present) Larry Ringer - Mayor (1986 - 1996) Bill Fox - Place 1 Hubbard Kennady Place 2 (Mayor Pro Tem) Nancy Crouch - Place 3 (Former) Larry Marriott- Place 4 David Hickson - Place 5 Dick Birdwell - Place 6 Planning& Zoning Kyle Hawthorne Chair Commissioners Winnie Garner Julius Gribou, AIA Craig Hall Mike Lane Larry R. Lightfoot Charles Smith Steve Parker James Massey City Staff Administration • George L. Noe - City Manager • Tom Brymer - Assistant City Manager Planning •Jane Kee, AICP - City Planner •Jim Callaway - Director of Development Services • Sabine Kuenzel, AICP - Senior Planner • Ed Hard, AICP - Transportation Planner •Joey Dunn, AICP - Staff Planner g ) • Natalie Thomas - Planning Technician •Jennifer Evans - Entry Level Staff Planner Engineering • Kent Laza, PE - City Engineer • Veronica Morgan - Assistant City Engineer • Steve Homeyer - Graduate Civil Engineer Economic & Community Development • Elrey Ash - Director •Jo Carrot - Community Development Administrator • Andy Gillies Housing Program Coordinator Utilities • Bill Riley - Water and Wastewater Superintendent I 1 MEW .............................................. . ..................................................................................................................... E4; i 1 Consultant Team �-{el muth, Obata + Kassabaum, Inc. } • Donal Simpson, AIA, AICP, ASIA-- Principal-in-Charge • Joseph A. Pobiner,AICP- Project Director 1 • Mark Bowers, AICP, ASLA l'- • Rick Leisner,AICP,ASIA , ( 'I • Carolyn Lussier Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. • Rod Kelly, PE • Eddie Haas a George Naylor Mike Wailer Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. , • Mike McKay, P E , o Allen Woelke, PE r • , c ' I S • V is PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER r1 College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas a' ni SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION 1.01 `Background The City of College Station is located in Brazos County, roughly Y equidistant between HoustonAustin. The and he City of Bryan (the Brazos County seat) is the only other a Station. y incorporated municipality that abuts Celle g Figure No. I shows the location of College tatson : . g Figure No. I = Location Map Waco*/ • Temple rdi 771 z •ilege tatio ..b•g Austin ' ;4 7. .. . Houston •1-1 o I 111.711 . • 1/San Antonio r.: Since the adoption of the City's previous Comprehensive Plan in 1980, which was updated in 1 9$9 College has continued P g Station to grow, thus compelling the City to re-study its planning assumptions and conditions ons and to look 20 years into the future. in 1994, the City selected a consulting ;" team lead by Hellmuth, Obata + Kassabaum, Inc. (Dallas, Texas) to update and revise the Comprehensive �ep Plan. The planning team also included Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. (Dallas, Texas), responsible for the transportation and thoroughfare plan, and Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.responsible for � Texas(Dallas, �' the water and wastewater system plan. 4 •tb • August 1996 Page 1 College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas The area covered by the Plan includes the entire incorporated area of the City of College Station along with most of the City's extraterritorial --.. jurisdiction (ETD and some portion of unincorporated Brazos County. .•'' It was determined that the City would not seek to grow beyond major • natural barriers including the Carter Creek and Brazos River floodplains. . All subsequent references in this report to "College Station"will include this entire planning area. This document replaces the City's 1980 Comprehensive Plan (and its 1989 update) and is divided into the following sections: • Section 1 - Introduction. • Section 2 -Visioning. • • Section 3— Land Use Plan. • Section 4 - Park and Open Space Plan. • Section 5 -Thoroughfare Plan. • Section 6 - Water and Wastewater System Plans. • Section 7- Urban Design Plan. 1 • Section 8 - Iniple.thentation. • Section 9 Summary. 1 • Appendices. 1.02 - History Although the City of College Station was incorporated in 1938, its. roots as a community go back to the founding of the Texas Agricultural • • and Mechanical College (now Texas A & M University). Established in 1876 as a land grant college, the University's closest incorporated cities at that time were Hearne (incorporated in 1864), Navasota (incorporated in 1866), and Bryan (incorporated in 1872). Before the City of College. .Station was incorporated, several • neighborhoods began to develop around the perimeter of the campus: • Northgate (north of University Drive) was the principal commercial area of the community ' and contained many campus-oriented businesses. After the City was incorporated, College Station's first City Hall was located in the Northgate area (initially at College Main and Patricia Street in a lease space, then in a building at . .Church Avenue and Wellborn Road). • The Eastgate/College Hills neighborhood (east of the campus) was comprised of mostly residential uses, with some commercial development along Highway 6, now known as Texas Avenue. o The Southgate neighborhood (S6Uth,, •of the campus) was also - , comprised,'of mostly residential ..uses, with some commercial development along Highway Many of the City's historically- significant homes and''structures are located in the Southgate neighborhOod. . • The majority of new growth in College Station continued to be located I adjacent to the university through the 1970's. Due to the physical . I constraints of the City of Bryan to the north, the Brazos River to the west, and Carter's Creek to the east, the 1980 Comprehensive Plan directed future growth to the south of existing development. 11' August 1996 Page 2 College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas in response to the 1980 plan, the City made numerous infrastructure .. :.. .'.. .... improvements to the south including expansion of SH 6 and the Lick Creek wastewater treatment plant The City's growth and prosperity has mirrored that of Texas A & M University. By the 1990s, the University's student population exceeded rt. 0,000,:.making it one of the largest campuses in the nation. As the region's principal employer, most College Station residents work either directly for the University or for a business that directly (or indirectly) supports the Universitymarket (students, faculty, and staff). The non-University development in College Station - banks, hotels, shopping centers, medical offices, industries, restaurants, etc. - provide employment opportunities for both College Station and Brazos County residents alike. Recently, many former students have been returning to College Station as a retirement destination because of the University, lifestyle amenities, and healthcare facilities. Texas A & M University currently has capped its student enrollment at approximately 42,000. if the University continues to "cap" its enrollment, other types of development will be necessary to sustain the region if it is to continue to grow. As College Station heads into the next century, its challenge is to continue to encourage quality growth while expanding other forms of residential and non-residential developments which are more independent from a university-based P P economy. 1.03 Population According to Census counts taken since 1950, College Station's Growth population has been steadily increasing. In fact, the City's most prolific decade was 1970-1980, when its annual growth rate was 11.1%, growing from 17,676 persons (1970) to 37,272 persons (1980). The high growth rate of the 1970's continued into the 1980's with the City experiencing close to a 10% annual growth rate during the first three years of that decade. College Station's proximity to the University and to employment areas in the City of Bryan have been a significant influence on its growth. College Station's growth has continued to increase since the 1990 Census, :albeit more modestly. The 1995 estimated population was approximately 58,000 - an average annual growth rate of over 2.1% since 1990. Table No. 1 details the City's growth from 1950 to 1995. �.'. Table No. 1 - Population Growth - 1950-1995 Year Census Average Annual Count Growth Rate 950 7,925 r 960 11,396 4.4% 970 17,676 5.5% 980 37,272 11.1% 990 52,456 4.1% q 995 (estimated) 58,000 2.1% August 1996 Page 3 " College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas Table No. 2 projects the City's 20-year population within a more controlled growth eryironment. College Station's ability to serve areas .• , with infrastructure and utilities will determine its ability to grow. Based on the 1989 Comprehensive Plan Update population analysis, and after meeting with City offici* and the public regarding future growth, a growth rate range of.:.between 2% and 4% was determined as being . realistic for the next 20 years in College Station. This growth rate • assumption yields, ,range of 46,200 to 127,000 persons. This population range is the basis for determining the population capacity requirements of the Comprehensive Master Plan. Table No. - Projected Population Growth - 1995-2015 • • . . . . Year . • Low Mid High • - (4%) 1995 58,000 58,000 58,000 20.09 64,000 67,200 70,500 • • 2005 70,700 78,000 85,800 2010 78,000 . 90,400 104,400 015 , 86,200 104,700 127,000 • 1.04 - Housing During the course of this study, the City requested a survey and count of the residential housing supply in the City limits and portions of the City's ETJ and unincorporated Brazos County. A letter report was presented to City staff in June 1995.. A total of 22,953 dwellingunits were counted College Station. 21,339 dwelling. units (93.0%) were in the city limits of College Station. o 1;559 dwelling units (6.8%) were within the City's ETJ area. o 55 dwelling units (0.2%) were.in unincorporated Brazos County outside the City's ETJ. • Dwelling units surveyed were divided into three distinct types: • Single-Family Homes - Dwelling units which are usually owner- occupied and detached, as well as units that may be attached such as patio homes, townhornes, zero-lot-line homes, etc. In College Station, it is not uncommon for detached houses to be renter- occupied due to several factors, including the large percentage of student population, o . • , Multiplex - These include dwelling units which are usually renter- occupied and attached, consisting of between 2 and 4 dwelling units per building. Developments that have more than one 4-unit building which are visibly a part of the same management company are considered to be an apartment. August 1996 Page 4 • College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas • Apartments - Dwelling units which are renter-occupied and attached, such as apartment complexes, small apartment buildings, homes divided into smaller rental units, and similar dwelling units. This also includes buildings with more than 4 dwelling units, complexes with both large multi-tenant buildings and 2-to-4 unit buildings, and developments with more than one 4-unit building. (Boarding/rooming houses, dormitories, fraternity/sorority houses, and other group quarters are considered as "institutional uses" and are not regarded as City residential uses). A total of 22,953 dwelling units were counted. Of these, 8,488 units (37.0%) were single family, 10,638 units (46.3%) were apartments, and 3,827 units (16.7%) were multiplexes. Table No. 3 summarizes the housing survey. ...• Table No. 3 - Residential Housing Survey Housing College City Uninc. Total Type Station ETJ County Single Family 6,968 1,469 51 8,488 Apartment 10,638 . 0 0 10,638 Multiplex 3,733 90 4 3,827 Total 21,339 1,559 55 22,953 The letter report submitted to the City in June 1995 also surveyed the condition of these homes. Homes were rated as follows: -• • Good - In satisfactory or better condition with no visible evidence of physical or cosmetic problems. • Deteriorating - Visibly in need of structural and/or cosmetic repairs and may not be in compliance with existing City codes. A "deteriorating" dwelling unit exhibits roof damage, foundation cracks, damage to structural elements, damage to permanent improvements (driveways, patios, siding, etc.), extensive peeling paint, neglected/overgrown landscaping, or similar problems. • Dilapidated - Visibly severe structural problems that threaten the health and safety of occupants, and warrant condemnation or removal. "Dilapidated" structures require extensive repairs and rebuilding which may exceed the structure's market value. 20,576 dwelling units - 89.6% - were rated as being in good condition, 2,231 homes (9.7%) were rated as deteriorating, and a small number of homes (146 dwelling units, 0.7%) were rated as dilapidated. Table No. 4 summarizes the housing condition survey (a complete copy of the letter report for the count and condition survey appears in Appendix A of this document). August 1996 Page 5 , College Station Comprehensive Plan [DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas ( ' . Table No. 4 - Residential Housing Condition Survey -. I HousingiType..b Area , %. . .• ' . . .. ....:. ' Dwelling Units 'Good 'Deteriorating Dilapidated Total City: Single Family 6,507 422 39 6,968 Apartment 9,490 1,148 0 10,638 Multiplex 3,361 368 4 3,733 Total City 19,358 1,938 43 21,339 City ETJ: Single Family 1,115 253 101 1,469 Apartment 0 . 0 0 0 Multiplex 60 30 0 90 Total City ETJ 1,175 283 101 1,559 County: Single Family 39 10 2 51 Apartment 0 0 0 0 Multiplex 4 0 0 4 Total County 43 '. , 10 2 55 Total Area: Single Family 7,661 685 142 8,488 Apartment 9,490 1,148 0 10,638 Multiplex 3,425 398 4 3,827 Total Area 20,576 2,231 146 22,953 \ = . . • . , . . .. • ( . August 1996 Page 6 -..........--. — r• i F6'•.8�8��-•PCFi�'� .. .. ... SECTION 2 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES • Y.1 4 Mr, 71 ;!. College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas SECTION 2 - GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 2.01 - Methodology The process of developing a plan for a community, whether it be from • scratch or revising an existing plan, must include numerous opportunities for public participation. The public participation process for the College Station Comprehensive Plan consisted of three steps: o A series bf one-on-one interviews with the City's elected and appointed officials - specifically, the members of the City Council, and the Planning& Zoning Commission. A series of stakeholder interviews in small groups. "Stakeholders" were comprised of homeowners, business representatives, church leaders, developers, and others with an interest in the future of College Station. A total of 31 stakeholders were interviewed. A community-wide survey printed in the local newspaper. • Approximately 21,000 survey forms were distributed throughout the College Station/Bryan area. A total of 171 households responded to the survey (equivalent to approximately 477 individuals). Public participation in the planning process was also encouraged during • the project. A series of Community Workshops were conducted during 1994, 1995 and 1996, in addition to public hearings conducted by the College Station Planning& Zoning Commission and City Council. Based on the input received during the interview/survey process (summarized in Appendices B and C), a list of goals and objectives was developed. These goals and objectives replace the City's existing goals and objectives as contained in the City's 1990 document entitled "Comprehensive Planning Program Volume II - Development Guide". 2.02 - Existing City The College Station City Council has adopted the following mission End-Statements statement and series of end-statements to help guide the City's growth. Existing City Mission Statement On behalf of the citizens of College Station, the City Council will promote the safety, health, and general well-being of our community within the bounds of fiscal responsibility while preserving and advancing the quality of life for its citizens. August 1996 Page 7 4'74 College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas Existing City End-Statements d Transportation - Citizens benefit from the ability to move into, out of, and within College Station in a safe and efficient manner. •p,_ ..: - • Parks and Recreation- Citizens benefit from parks and recreational activities that aregeographicallyand demographically accessible and serve a diversity of interests. • • Health and Public Safety - Citizens benefit from a reasonably ; safe and secure environment. = _g. • Education and Information - Citizens benefit from access to broad-based information and knowledge. • Quality Services - Citizens benefit from value and quality services Y:8t delivered at a reasonable tax rate. • Cultural Arts - Citizens benefit from a participation in the arts. • Employment and Prosperity - Citizens benefit from an environment that is conducive to providing diverse employment opportunities. • Civic Pride - Citizens benefit from well-planned, attractive residential and commercial areas, and from preserving historic areas. After reviewing the City's current mission statement and end- statements, it was determined that these statements remain valid for College Station. The interview survey results were combined with the City's existing goals and objectives (the "Volume document) to arrive at the k s following list ofgoals and toguide the development of the ��;�� g objectivesP Comprehensive Plan. UI 2.03 - Land Use Goal #1 - College Station should continue to provide and Goals and locate adequate amounts of appropriately zoned land for all £F Objectives necessary types of land uses in an efficient, convenient, harmonious, and ecologically sound manner. • Objective 1.1 -- College Station should plan future land uses together with thoroughfare and utility improvements/extensions in order to assure appropriate access/service for new growth. • Objective 1: - College Station should promote the use of vacant land in the existing sewershed area where City infrastructure and services are readily available in order to avoid costs to the City of �s§ eR providing extended services. UT .,: : August .... 1996 Page xip Q 8 College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas • • Objective 1.3 College Station should continue to avoid strip commercial development (such as that along Texas Avenue) and encourage centralized commercial development which encourages multi-modal access. (‘, • Objective 1.4 - College Statiot's should identify the most appropriate land use for all undeveloped parcels within its City limits and its Ell and use its developmentpowers (including zoning and capital improvement programs) to guide the locations of desired r" development. ° Objective 1.5 - college Station should maintain its Comprehensive Plan through periodic updates changes occur in growth rates or Major development policies. Goal #2 - College Station should continue to provide for the orderly development of existing and future land uses. • Objective 2.1 - College, Station should develop standards for providing appropriate k)Offerir.ig. and screening between residential and non-residential uses. • Objective 2.2. - College Station should develop standards that promote a • reduction of land use intensity as development approaches'established and future residential areas. • Objective 2.3 - College Station should encourage compatible in-fill development in areas between neighborhoods, such as neighborhood retail. • Objective 2.4 - College Station should develop zoning districts . which allow a mixture of residential and non-residential uses which complement and support each other. Goal#3 - College Station should continue to protect, preserve and enhance existing and future neighborhoods. • Objective, 3.1. - College Station, should continue to protect the integrity of residential areas by: minimizing intrutiie and incompatible land uses. • „ Objective 3.2 College Station hould encourage compatible in-fill development, such as:small-scale neighborhood retail, adjacent to residntial neighborhoods. • • Objective 3.3 - College Station should encourage mixed-use developments which ..provide, for an appropriate combination of residential and support uses; „ • . • , Goal #4 College Stition should continue to encourage community participation and involvement. • • Objective 4.1 - College Station should continue to actively involve citizens and business interests in 'the development review and approval process. August 1996 Page 9 College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas • Goal #5 - College Station should encourage development that is in harmony with the environment. • Objective 5.1 - College Station should minimize reclamation of the 100-year floodplain associated with Carter Creek, Lick Creek, Wolf • Pen Creek, and the Brazos River in order to prevent upstream flooding, avoid long term structural and erosion problems • associated with floodplain reclamation, and to provide a city wide network of natural open space. • Objective 5.2 - College Station should allow compact, "village"-style development patterns in appropriate areas such as in Northgate and Eastgate/College Hills. • Objective 5.3 - College Station should continue to comply with all existing and future State and Federal regulations that identify and protect natural areas. • Objective 5.4 - College Station should identify all environmentally- sensitive areas, including wetlands, prime farmlands, and habitats of endangered and threatened species. • Objective 5.5 - College Station may consider new land uses and development patterns that were not anticipated by the Compre- hensive Plan, provided these new land uses and development patterns are compatible with the environment and any surrounding development.. Goal #6 - College Station should continue to preserve/protect significant features, such as culturally and architecturally significant historic buildings. • Objective 6.1 - College Station should inventory all historically significant structures and landmarks within the City limits and ETJ to be used for State and National preservation designation, as appropriate. !•1 • Objective 6.2 - College Station should develop a "Historic Overlay" zoning district which may be applied to historically-significant areas. Goal #7 - College Station should continue to designate open space and public space areas for recreation and preservation uses. • Objective 7.1 - College Station should modify its parkland donation/purchase policy to allow "cash in lieu of land" payments to be escrowed for a maximum of 5 years. August 1996 Page 10 College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas • Objective 7.2 - College Station should continue to provide recreational opportunities in new neighborhoods and other developed and "urbanized" areas, such as Northgate. • Objective 7.3 - College Station should continue to jointly develop and maintain future parks and recreation areas with other public agencies, including the College Station Independent School District, the Bryan Independent School District, the University, the City of Bryan, and Brazos County. Goal #8 - College Station should designate special districts and corridors in the City limits for unique types of development. • Objective 8.1 - College Station should continue to develop the Wolf Pen Creek District with recreational, retail, office, and residential uses. • Objective 8.2 - College Station should implement the Northgate Redevelopment Plan as adopted by City Council in December 1995. • Objective 8.3 - College Station should study the Eastgate/College Hills neighborhood and develop a redevelopment/revitalization plan for this area. • Objective 8.4 - College Station should study the Southgate neighborhood and -develop a preservation/enhancement plan for this area. • Objective 8.5 - College Station should designate Texas Avenue, • George Bush Drive, FM 2818, and Wellborn Road as "special corridors" for enhancement and protection. • Objective 8.6 - College Station should designate the East Bypass (fromHarvey Road to Graham Road) as a "special district" to protect existing and future residential developments from adjacent incompatible uses. Goal #9 - College Station should continue to review and revise its development ordinances. • Objective 9.1 - College Station should reformat its development ordinances into a single document (a Land Development Guide) for ease of reference. Any areas of incompatibility and conflict should be identified and resolved. • Objective 9.2 - College Station should update its Zoning Ordinance to make it compatible with the revised Comprehensive Plan. a Objective 9.3 - College Station should update its Subdivision Regulations Ordinance to make it compatible with the revised Comprehensive Plan. August 1996 Page II College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas Goal #10 - College Station should monitor growth over the next 20 years to assure that the Comprehensive Plan is kept current. • Objective 10.1 - College Station should review and update of the Comprehensive Plan as warranted based upon changes in population growth, A&M enrollment policies and economic development. • Objective 10.2 - College Station should monitor its residential growth rate to determine if the annual rate is between 2% and 4%. If the residential growth rate is not within this range, the City may positively manage its growth through such mechanisms as the 11;•: Capital Improvements Program, annexation, and other growth management tools. • Objective 10.3 - College Station should annex land only when that area has been platted and is ready to be developed and served by City utilities. College Station should refrain from annexing new areas that are undeveloped or unserved by utilities, as has been done previously. • Objective 10.4 - The cities of College Station and Bryan should, continue to abide by the joint resolution which determines the ultimate extension of each city's boundary. 2.04 Housing Goals Goal #1 - College Station should continue to provide an and Objectives appropriate supply of housing with a wide variety of housing types and costs. • Objective 1.1 - College Station should continue to maintain the integrity of the existing housing supply by enforcement of the housing code and other controls. • Objective 1.2 - College Station should continue to review and upgrade the minimum building codes in order to ensure quality and economic construction. • Objective 1.3 - College Station should continue to encourage new construction which is energy efficient. • Objective 1.4 - College Station should continue to upgrade neighborhoods and individual structures which are deteriorated or dilapidated. • Objective 1.5 - College Station should continue to encourage the development of diversified housing types for low- and fixed-income residents through Community Development Block Grant-funded programs and other financial resources. • Objective 1.6 - College Station should continue to evaluate existing codes relative to advances in technology and materials. August 1996 Page 12 I , II College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] c City of College Station,Texas I 4 2.05 - Community Goal #1 - College Station should continue toP romote a Appearance Goals beautiful and safe environment. and Objectives �f ' • Objective I. - College Station should continue to improve and maintain the appearance of its municipal properties. Objective 1.2 - College Station should continue topromote good site design, provide >g g , a good appearance, minimize drainage impacts, and increase pedestrian safety. The City should continue to use high`quality design of public buildings and landscaping to serve as a model for the private sector. Objective 1.3 College Station should develop solutions to abate flooding and drainage problems in the City. • Objective 1.4 - College Station should continue to minimize and eliminate unsightly conditions such as junkyards, abandoned vehicles, dilapidated buildings/structures/fences, and excessive weeds and rubbish. The City should assure maintenance of signs and fences and the longevity of required landscaping through effective code enforcement. s Objective 1.5 - College Station should continue toP romote community-wide pride in the City. m Objective 1.6 -- College Station should continue to implement its street tree planting program in coordination with the Streetscape Plan (as previously adopted by the City Council). • Objective 1.7 - College Station should continue to use high quality design of public buildings and landscaping to serve as a model for `... the private sector. • Objective 1.8 - College Station should continue to implement the r .W main gateways into the City along major corridors, including Texas Avenue, SH 6, Wellborn Road `and FM 2818. • Objective 1.9 - College Station should establish a "Main-Street" program in the vicinity of the Northgate, Eastgate, and Southgate districts. , 2.06 Economic . Goal #1 - College Station should continue to encourage g Development Goals diversification of the local economy. . and Objectives y • Objective I.I - College Station should continue to encourage industrial, commercial, and residential development to serve residents needs, which is in harmony with the environment and surrounding development ment patterns. P f ( ' August 1996 Page 13 'Sy3S aeF«:'J+t*.af.a:a:,:l:.wne,u.aekrn9.:vr,oywuae,ww+Daae....-o-v.rn.r.ba-.....+u.i.....,....m....,.................................f�_.......,..........-......_-•-.-_..._............................. s►a College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas sp • Objective 1.2 -- College Station should.continue to encourage the retention and expansion of existing retail in accordance with the .. Comprehensive Plan, especially in older redeveloping areas like the Northgate district. ▪ Objective 1.3 - College Station should continue to attract other .; professional businesses that would enhance the area's quality of life, including medical care, restaurants, and small professional offices. Objective 1.4 - College Station should continue to promote tourism and convention business, especially with regard to facilities such as the George Bush Presidential Library Center and the University. Objective 1.5 - College Station should encourage the development of compatible uses to complement the University, such as additional lodging, restaurant or conference facilities. • Objective 1.6 - College Station should encourage the development of additional retirement communities and support services. • Goal #2 - College Station should continue to work cooperatively with the University, the College Station ISD, the City of Bryan, and Brazos Countyregarding proposed future plans. • Objective v Obj i e 2.1 College Station, the University, the College Station ISD, the City of Bryan, and Brazos County should continue to work closely together to determine creative and innovative solutions that benefit all parties. L -.Objective 2.2 - College Station, the University, the College Station ISD, the City of Bryan, and Brazos County should annually review their goals and objectives to determine if the statements are still valid or if revisions are warranted. a Objective 2.3 - College Station, the University, the College Station ISD, the Cityof Bryan, and Brazos County an '! should work cooperatively to attract new industries and developments to the region. M4`:T 2.07 Transporta- Goal #1 - College Station should balance the development of tion Goals and all modes of transportation to assure the fast, convenient, Objectives efficient and safe movement of people and goods to, from, and fay.= within. the community while continuing to protect the integrity of neighborhoods. • Objective 1.1 College Station should continue to work with TxDOT to provide for the development/redevelopment of major arterial routes - including Texas Avenue, Wellborn .Road, Harvey Road, University Drive, and George Bush Drive - as necessary to help ease traffic congestion. • August 1996 Page 14 • C7 College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas • Objective 1.2 - College Station should develop and improve minor arterial and collector streets which parallel Texas Avenue to accommodate the need for north/south mobility. • • Objective 1.3 - College Station should continue to develop • adequate, safe systems for pedestrian and bicycle movement between neighborhoods, schools, parks, retail/office areas, and the University. • Objective 1.4 - College Station should continue to work with the University and Brazos Valley Transit to monitor the need for further development of public transportation systems. cr. Objective 1.5 - College Station should continue to cooperate with other local entities in efforts to minimize adverse effects of the railroad tracks paralleling Wellborn Road and at-grade crossings on access to the City and the University campus. • Objective 1.6 - College Station should continue to work with the University to provide adequate air transportation by continuing the development of air transportation facilities as part of an overall transportation plan and connections to the ground transportation system. The City should also continue to support the on-going development of Easterwood Airport through runway extensions, terminal improvements, and additional air carrier service, as on ebeided. • ective 1.7 - College Station should continue to provide for the routing of goods and services delivery vehicles to assure minimal adverse impacts on residential neighborhoods. ▪ Objective 1.8 - College Station should provide incentives to encourage the reduction of travel through demand management techniques such as carpooling and van-pooling. dGeovaello#p2m- College, asnhdouolpdercaotniotninuoef atosafeen,suefrflecitehnet . . and effective transportation system to serve the City. o Objective 2.1 - College Station should continue to develop and maintain a transportation planning process which addresses long range needs and emphasizes short and mid-range.. problem-solving. o Objective 2.2 - College Station should continue to develop and maintain regularly-scheduled programs and funding strategies to • implement new thoroughfare plan street improvements, ensuring adequate capacity at the least cost to the City without compromising service, delivery, or quality. • Objective 2.3 - College Station should continue an organized preventative maintenance program, including the residential street pavement management programs, to ensure safety and long, economical life. August I 996 Page I 5 . . ,}f• College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas • Objective 2.4 - College Station should continue to provide a system of bikeways and walkways throughout the City and provide incentives for the use of non-motorized transport. The City should also continue to revise and update its Citywide Bikeway Master Plan. • Objective 2.5 - College Station should encourage the provision of railroad facilities, and service to the City's established and future industrial areas, which are compatible with traffic operations and safety considerations. • Objective 2.6 - College Station should encourage the provision of a fiscally responsible transit system which gives consideration to journey-to-work trips, the needs of transit dependent persons, and opportunities for inter-modal transfer. Goal #3 - College Station should continue to ensure a balanced relationship between land use development and the transportation system. • Objective 3.1 - College Station should maintain administrative procedures and responsibilities for the preparation, review and approval of transportation plans which are directly related to proposed land use development plans. • Objective 3.2 - College Station should continue to maintain a Master Thoroughfare Plan which is coordinated with the land use development considerations represented in the Comprehensive plan which permits the following: Ff2, a. Right-of-way dedications as specified by the Master Thoroughfare Plan. b. Right-of-way acquisition necessary to improve intersection capacity and thoroughfare continuity. c. Intersection designs and street alignments to meet existing and projected traffic demand. d. Dedication of street system rights-of-way in those areas of the community that are undeveloped. • Objective 3.3 - College Station should continue to enforce street design criteria for all new developments. • Objective 3.4 - College Station should continue to coordinate local, State and Federal street/highway improvement project planning with existing and projected land uses. • Objective 3.5 - College Station should locate and design thoroughfares to provide a high level of design amenity and neighborhood preservation, including the consideration of neighborhood traffic management programs in developed areas. August 1996 Page 16 College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFTS City of College Station,Texas • • Objective 3.6 - College Station should continue to promote its functional classification system to provide for the graduation of traffic flow from the movement function to the access function. r . • objective 3.7 - College Station* should continue to promote a program of access management to minimize vehicular conflicts on collector and arterial streets. Goal #4 - College Station should develop a street and parking system whichensures economically healthy cultural, historic, civic, and commercial areas. • Objective 4.1 - College Station should provide adequate and strategically located parking to serve business, government, and cultural activities in existing areas and in the proposed Civic Center area as contained in the Comprehensive Plan. • Objective 4.2 - College Station should provide for physical and operational improvements to the street system which enhance the orderly, safe and efficient movement of vehicular traffic and pedestrians.to, through, and within existing businesses and cultural areas and the proposed Civic Center area. as contained in the Comprehensive Plan. • Objective 4.3 - College Station should continue to promote and maintain a program to minimize the use of on-street parking where it interferes with or otherwise impedes the flow of traffic on collector and arterial streets. Goal #5 - * College tation should provide for the safe movement of pedestrians and bicyclists within College Station. • • Objective 5.1 - College Station should continue to encourage the use of alternate modes of transportation to reduce air pollution and traffic congestion, including transit, bicycle, and pedestrian. • Objective 5.2 ; College Station should continue to encourage that new developments, be designed to minimize cut-through traffic, especially in residential neighborhoods and pedestrian areas, such as Eastgate/College Hills, the East Bypass neighborhoods, and Southgate. • Objective 5.3 -:College Station should continue to provide sidewalk access in all residential areas, and maintain the existing sidewalk network. • . College Station should adopt street design standardsards and parking policies which are"bicycle-friendly". o Objective 5.5 - CollegeStation.should continue to provide bikeways between residential areas, parks, schools, the University, and retail/employment centers. • �X' A August 1996 Page 17 College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas • Goal #6 - College Station should continue to work with the ..... Brazos valley Transit System and the University to provide for efficient bus service within the community. •• Objective 6.1 - College Station should institute bus incentives to ■ - encourage the use of transit to reduce air pollution and traffic congestion, such as: a. Transit facilities for existing and new developments. 6.bF b. Texas A & M University Shuttle and Urban Trolley transit service between all residential areas, the University, retail and employment centers, and between regional destinations • Objective 6.2 - College Station should examine and promote land use concepts which enhance transit usage. • 2.08 - Parks and Goal #1 - College Station should continue to enhance its µgk Recreation Goals system of parks, recreation facilities, and open space. and Objectives aM: • Objective 1.1 - College Station should continue to maintain the high quality and wide variety of park and recreation resources now available to residents and visitors, and to provide for expansion as needed. • Objective 1.2 College Station should encourage additional connections between selected parks/recreation areas and ) residential areas by a system of linear parks/parkways which utilize creek beds, drainage ways,and other natural features. Goal #2 - College Station should continue to provide the highest qualityparks and recreational facilities. g • Objective 2.1 - College Station should continue to maintain,and improve all existing City parks, equipment, and grounds. • Objective 2.2 - College Station should continue to develop and maintain a variety of parks and park improvements, including • neighborhood playgrounds, "vest-pocket" parks, linear natural corridors, and special streetscape areas in locations such as Northgate and along Texas Avenue. • Objective 2.3- College Station should continue to jointly develop . and maintain parks and recreation areas with other public agencies, including theUniversity, College Station Independent School clu District, and Brazos County. Goal #3 - Develop greenbelts to connect park and residential areas. August 1996 Page 18 fir•" College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas • Objective 3.1 - College Station should develop a donation/purchase policy to acquire remaining parcels that are within the 100-year t'. floodplain that may have been platted and developed. 1 • Objective 3.2 - College Station should designate undeveloped parcels within the 100-year floodplain as "natural corridors" that are to be used for open space and passive recreation uses. 2.09 - Utility Goal #1 - College Station should continue to provide the Goals and quantity and quality of utilities needed to assure public health, Objectives safety, and accommodation of growth. • Objective 1.1 - College Station should investigate and develop, if necessary, surface water sources to meet current and future needs. • Objective 1.2 - College Station should update the water and wastewater master system plan every 10 years and perform a detailed master plan review every 5 years. • Objective 1.3 - College Station should review and adjust its financial plan to maintain and enhance the City's bond rating to minimize the cost of major capital expenditures. Goal #2 - College Station should continue to provide the • 'highest level of water service. • Objective 2.1 - College Station should continue to serve all developed parcels within the city limits with City water service. Water service should be extended to undeveloped areas outside the city limits only as a condition of annexation. • Objective 2.2 - College Station should develop a water distribution system replacement schedule for older lines in the system, such as the Northgate and Eastgate/College Hills areas, to increase the reliability of the'system in these areas. • Objective 2.3 - College Station should continue to expand both ground and elevated water storage capacity to increase pressure and fire-flow as growth occurs. Goal #3 - Provide the highest level of sanitary sewer service. • Objective 3.1 - College Station should continue to serve all developed parcels within the city limits with City sanitary sewer service. Sewer'service should be extended to undeveloped areas outside the city limits only as a condition of annexation. • Objective 3.2 - College Station should identify the older parts of the sanitary sewer collection system and develop a plan for replacement and/or rehabilitation of these lines to reduce system infiltration and increase system reliability. • August 1996 Page 19 ............... •rf, ti� College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas Goal #4 - College Station should continue to provide for adequate storm drainage and stormwater management. Objective 4.1 - College Station should develop .a plan to manage current and projected stormwater run-off in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan., o Objective 4.2. - College Station should begin addressing stormwater quality in addition to stormwater quantity as part of an overall stormwater management plan. Goal #5 - College Station should continue to provide the highest quality and most efficient solid waste disposal system. Objective 5.1 - College Station should encourage the reduction of the total amount of municipal solid waste generated by 10% a year for the next 4 years. o Objective 5.2 - College Station should project the useable life-span of its existing landfill and begin planning needed expansions or land ,1 acquisitions 5-10 years in advance of actual need. • Objective 5.3 - College Station should utilize a mulching/composting facility at a central location to handle yard waste. • • August 1996 Page 20 ....................... College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas Of those surveys, a total of 171 households responded. The specific -- goals and objectives developed as a part of the interviews and surveys are located in Section 2 of this report. in 1993, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board developed a survey �Mry � of the College Station City Council, Park's staff, and its' own members in which the top five park master plan issues for each group were identified. Those issues were incorporated into the planning process and are located in Appendix D. As the Park and Open Space Plan was being developed, Community workshops and Public Hearings were held in 1994, 1995 and 1996, and comments received during those meetings were incorporated into the plan• The Comprehensive Plan considers parks to be as viable a land use as single-family residential, offices, retail, or any other classification. `'+¢= While College Station has done a good job in providing a variety of tlF'° parks, the potential for future development, as shown in the Land Use a� i d i Pl atrevisit theof n, n c es the needto process siting ng and developing additional parks. If College Station is projected to effectively double in population over the next 20 years, there will need to be a parallel increase in park and open space development. The process of projecting future; park and open space needs, therefore, re, is driven by two key factors - population and location: Population is a key factor in determining the appropriate number of. o =•P m future parks and their size. Accepted park standards from .5 organizations such as the National Recreation and Park Association help determine the appropriate number and size of parks based on population levels. Location is also key for park siting as are visibility, security and �e, accessibility. Strategic parcels should be identified well in advance in j. �x order to preserve them for future park use. Sites along creeks, rivers, floodplains, along gently rolling terrain, and heavily treed areas are often most desirable for parks. Additionally, care must be xr taken in siting parks that attract pedestrians and bicyclists so that the crossing of major thoroughfares is minimized or eliminated. 4.02 - Existing In the existingand future land use tables presented earlier in this Core Parks report, parks and open space were classified as "undeveloped". In the ,..g strictest sense of the word, parks and open space are not developed as p ^I tax-revenue generating uses. They are, however, recreation sites that may have site improvements such as grading, fields, courts, playgrounds, small`buildings, etc. For the purpose of this report, parks and open space will beconsidered cons as 'undeveloped' land uses, inasmuch as they are not commercially or residentially developed. Thei Station id bli C ty of College is the Prov provider of parks and public open space in College.Station. The park and open space needs of . College Station are unique due to the existence of Texas A & M University within the city limits, the proximity to the City of Bryan, and A the expectation on the part of the citizens of College Station for the City to continue to provide a high level of park service. i5v August 1996 Page 66 .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................... . ................................................................. s College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas SECTION 4 - PARK AND OPEN SPACE PLAN 1 ( . L — '•rd --,fr— . . (2_, f 1. ----c). :/tige7: .j`N.4'. , , , .. .1 ' i. .... ,,,, '3 '"I- : 11110410(44""k 4 ., '' - .'. 'V if -'''',: r-,-- , , ,, .. . . : . , f .r f t s • L • , ' (. j ,,i, 54.,.,--- , ,. . • . ','''j, -.'.f4. .„,,,. ....r--,1r21,-11'-)- ...):..1.j.,, _.-.T..A cr. j . . ,, i . :. v,,., , ..4„,, _ c.,.,,. " ....., .,, .., " T �- ‘2 : . L f .� .. i •J ..fir '',"' r . ,. • ,./ .slilt tJ -..w f I.•,. Rpi: :q � 1 ~���r .. sl- Fir �r� 7/!�w`� �� ::1 ,: . 7.---------,.... . .,..„-. ..... - ,.....,,,,... �q A � •rte ,r + V,...... ,_, . :,e"*\--N,ork..)1\: __.. . . - . . 1.'.. ' , _ : . .. 41.-.-,-, .. \tie , - .4,4 . , -41( :.-,,,,_--:-,,,-... -....r."--.1 1 i( �" a��'.-1.•- ' r ../y r w, A.,....-... 4 /1„.0..i • . A,,. j i ' ,..........1.4..,—.rwM.r�.ww.R �■.r..rwr • wr.n `rrw...�.r.r.wr . , . . . . . . . . . . . . , 4.01:.- P r ecess Man of thegreat communities of the United States have emphasized Y , ' parks and open space as,..an integral part of their land use and comprehensive plannin•g.: Cities with..celebrated park systems, including Kansas City, Cleveland, Austin, FPasadena, and Boston, intentionally set aside areas for park development. • Unfortunates over.the past:4V,,years, many other cities have relegated:: . .. .arks and open space;?to odd-sized and "left-over parcels, in.favor,of. P maximizing development. The City. :of Calle e.Station:.Park€ and -Open Space Plan was begun in • : w }.. �,:, . - : . . with the [994• in conjunction with the.:com rehensive Plan. As P , cop'.10.1.-Obef)siV .Pln,.• e a .goals.and objectives were developed through a ' series-of interviews with._members:of the College Station City Council, Planning and Zonis Co mission and Parks and.Recreation Advisory g. g Board,:,as well: as. ,,selected homeowners, business representatives, ' clurch':3.leaders,.,develo. ers and others:with an interest in the future of . ti diti survey wasprintedin College Sia on. .Ad . anally a connmur.)4--wide s rve the local newspaper with approximately, 21,000 survey forms being . distributed. (See.Appendix C) , ' (,.. . , August 1996 Page 65 1 Y` i i Ii %cs r:a r.. ti a. + SECTION 4 PARK ANIS OPEN SPACE PLAN Y P 1 :I((yyy College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas At Texas A & M University, many of the student, faculty and staff park and open space needs are provided on campus through the provision of balifields, sports courts, and passive open space areas. The University also operates Hensel Park within the College Station city limits which is a joint-use facility for students and College Station residents. However, it should not be assumed that all of the University related park and open space needs are being met on campus due to the distribution of University students, faculty and staff throughout the region, and the availability of organized athletic leagues within the City. The proximity of College Station to the City of Bryan may also be impacting the park and open space needs in the City of College Station. If now or in the future, the need for parks and open space is not being met within the City of Bryan, some Bryan citizens may choose to utilize facilities available in the City of College Station. However, it is not believed that College Station's proximity to the City of Bryan has as large an impact upon the park and open space needs within the City as does the existence of Texas A & M University. In all, a total of 418.80 acres of parkland are provided for 58,000 persons - an average of 7.22 acres of parkland and open space per 1,000 population excluding regional parks (see Table No, 8). College Station is also divided into park zones for the purpose of existing and future park planning. Eleven park zones currently exist, with a total of 17 zones being identified for future needs. A total of 32 parks currently exist in College Station with 31 developed and one undeveloped. Existing private parks have not been included in this study due to the lack of guarantee of future levels of service. To determine the appropriate amount of parkland for College Station, the Plan utilized standards developed by the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) - an independent, non-profit organization whose purpose is to "advocate quality parks for the American people". Both the 1983 Recreation, Park and Open Space Standards and Guidelines, and the 1995 Park, Recreation, Open Space and Greenway Guidelines published by the National Recreation and Park Association were utilized. While the 1995 guidelines have shifted away from absolute numerical standards and encourage community self direction in which park acreage is based upon citizen's desires and specific regional needs, it was determined that because of the high level of service that has been provided in College Station in the past, the national parkland dedication standards developed in the past are still appropriate for the City. Those standards were reviewed in light of the unique factors impacting College Station's park and open space needs, as well as the existing policies and desires of the City of College Station Park and Recreation Department and citizens, in order to determine a level of • parkland dedication appropriate for the City. The NRPA has researched the park and open space needs of communities and makes • the following recommendations for"core" parkland: • Mini-Park- A mini-park serves a small area and may include picnic areas, playgrounds, and seating. Many school and church playgrounds often function as de facto mini-parks. The NRPA recommends that Mini-parks be approximately I to 2 acres each and be provided at the ratio of 0.25 to 0.5 acres per 1,000 population. The City currently has six mini-parks with a total of 9.70 acres. August 1996 Page 67 r 1 if College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas • Neighborhood Park - A neighborhood park serves a larger population than a mini-park and may also include more intense ... recreational activities such as field games, court games and ( swimming pools. The NRPA recommends that Neighborhood parks be approximately 15 to 20 acres each and be provided at the ratio of 1 to 2 acres per 1,000 population. The City currently has . 1 twentyneighborhood parks with a total of 201.62 acres. The city's i policy s to provide for activities that focus on youth and families such as practice areas for soccer, softball, baseball and basketball, and, playground, tennis and picnic facilities. In College Station, • neighborhood parks will generally be 10 to 15 acres. . Community Park - Community parks tends to serve many neighborhoodsand provide many of the same types of facilities as . neighborhood parks with the addition of athletic complexes, large swimming pools, community centers, and nature preserves. The NRPA recommends that Community parks be approximately 25 to 30 acres each and be provided at the:ratio of 5 to 8 acres per 1,000 population. The City currently has six community parks with a total I , of 207.48 acres. In College Station, community parks will generally - ' be 40•-• 50 acres and serve one park zone. • Regional Park - Regional parks serve entire cities or regions. . Activities available in regional parks may include picnicking, boating, • fishing, swimming, camping, trail use, a golf course, etc. Regional , parks tend to be large (over 200 acres) and should be provided at ,,_the' ratio of 5 to 10 acres per 1,000 population. Because of their regional nature, regional parks are usually not figured into the "core" parkland provided by a city. A.city or a region may only be (1 . able to support one or two regional parks. The City currently has one Regional Park with a total of 515 acres. ,. O Athletic Complex - Athletic complexes typically consolidate ., , 1 . . heavily programmed athletic facilities for activities such as softball, baseball and soccer into a few strategically located sites throughout ., ii-iiiommunity. The location.of these facilities is important due to traffic, lighting and noise that areoften associated with them. I • • SouthwoO , . d Park in College Station currently serves as a . . . Community Park as well as the City's only athletic complex. Voter • . approval was received in 1995 to,acquire land for a 150 acre 1 . , regional athletic park.' . _ . . , • Recreation! Community Centers - Recreation and community • . centers typically provide a facility for a community's indoor. recreation needs.. , . ,Gymnasiums, group activity rooms and swimming , . pools are often. located within these facilities. In College Station, the Lincoln Center is utilized for youth activities and . . ' programmed indoor sportrecreational programs. The City intends to continue the existing policy of utilizing the multi-purpose ... ' buildings at schools for recreation centers and intends to provide . . ., , future'recreation centers in College Station as needed. . , I , . , . .. Table No. 8 presents the existing "core" parkland divided by park zone , and park type. 'Additionally,the City owns Lick Creek Park, a 515 acre regional preserve. The acreage of Lick Creek Park has not been. . included in calculation of park needs under NRPA standards. . . ,. 1 • August 1996 Page 68 • College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas Table No. 8 - Existing Core Parkland ss: !", t Park Park Existing Parks(acres) Total • =_ Acres- Mini-Park Zone Name , Mini-Park Neighborhd. Community kb2 : 1 Hensel Park -- .._ 29.70 29.70 Total-Zone l _.. -- 29.70 29.70 s . 2 Eastgate Park 1.00 -. -- 1 r00 Lions Park 1.50 -- -.. 1.50 Merry Oaks Park -- 4.60 -- 4.60 Oaks Park -- 7.50 -- 7.50 ,: e=. New parksite (Undeveloped) F:.., Parkway -Park 1.90 -- - 1.90 Richard Carter Park Thomas Park -- -- 16.10 16.10 Total-Zone 2 4.40 29.70 16.10 50.20 3 Central Park -- -- 47.20 47.20 nw Cy Miller Park . 2.50 -- -- 2.50 Wolf Pen Creek Park -- 19.47 -.. 19.47 Total - Zone 3 2.50 19.47 47.20 69.17 4 Raintree Park -- 13.00 -- 13.00 .. . :.-.... M Windwood Park 1.03 ...� 1.00 -°. Total r.Zone 4 1.00 13.00 _.. 14.00 5 Brothers Pond Park -- 1 6.1 0 -- 16.10 '" Edelweiss Park -. 10.90 -- 10.90 Georgie K. Fitch Park - 11.30 -.. 11.30 Longmire Park -.. 4.20 -- 4.20 Southwood Park -- -- 44.70 44.70 Jack& Dorothy Miller Park - 10.00 I.- Total Zone 5 -- 52.50 44.70 97.20 6 Anderson Park 8,90 -- 8.90 Bee Creek Park -- -- 43.50 43.50 Brison Park ..- 9.20 ..- 9.20 Fairview Park 1.80 -- -- 1.80 Gabbard Park -- 10.70 -- 10.70 Lemontree Park .... 15.40 -- 15.40 Wayne Smith Park -- 26.28 26.28 Total -Zone 6 1.80 44.20 69.78 115.78 • 7 Woodway Park 6.45 -- 6.45 F: Total - Zone 7 .. 6.45 -- 6.45 8 Emerald Forest Park -- 4.50 -- 4.50 ko Sandstone Park -- 15.00 -- 15.00 Woodcreek Park =�.;. 6.60 -- 6.60 Total -Zone 8 -- 26.10 •.- 26.10 .&= 9 (No existing parks in Zone 9) -- N.- .0- -. �°s a` 10 (No existing parks in Zone 10) -- -- -- --- 1 1 Pebble Creek Park -- 10.20 -_ 10.20 ;, -- 10.20 -- 10.20 Teta[ �Zane l 1 w TOTAL 9.70 201. 2 207.48 ss ....-- } °� 9 ' August 1996 Page 69 •cE Rg College Station Comprehensive:Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas 4.03 - Projected The NRPA recommends an average of 6.25 to 10 ,.,: .5 acres of mini, . , Future Needs neighborhood and community parks per 1,000 population. The City of ..„. College Station currently provides ari average of 7.22 acres of parkland and open space per 1,000 populatiop. It is recommended that the City provide a ratio of parkland closer to the 10.5 acres per 1,000 .,. population due to the City's young population, a high percentage of ( .' . . rental properties, the citizen's expectation of a high level of park ,,, ..•,,,7: service,and opportunities to encourage visitors and tourism. By projecting population for each park zone, the ratio of parkland by type and overall parkland per 1,000 persons can also be projected. In ..., some park zones, the average may exceed the 10.5 average . recommended by the NRPA, while in others, it may be less,than the 10.5 average. This can be attributed to a park zone.already exceeding 11 the 10.5 average and expecting little or no future growth; or a. park zone that is proposed to be developed at 'a very low density having a need for a neighborhood or community park, but not having a ..,,.. population to support the minimum park size recommended. In these cases, two park zones were combined in order to share a park facility and provide the level of service needed by both zones. In other zones, Y: the average may be less than the 10.5 average. Overall, the 10.5 figure is used as a guide for College Station in area wide park and open space I.' development. Table No. 9 shows the projected population for each park zone and the projected future additional parkland required. The projected ,Land Use Plan population capacity of 118,049 is within the range Of projected future population for College Station. The.total amount of parkland is „. 1, 60.80 acres - an average provision of approximately 10.68 acres per 0 1,000 population. This is acceptable for College Station*, .although it is slightly higher than the recommended NRPA standard. . ,. Table No. 9 - Projected Park Needs by Zone ( .,.. Park Future Proposed . .Existing Future New Zone 'Pop. Ratio Parkland Parkland Parkland (acres .(acres) (acres) Needed per (acres) . 1,000) , 1 4,759 10.44 29.70 '49.70 20.00 ' 2 11,886 10.11 50.20 120.20 70.00 3 7,260 11.59 69.17 84.17 15.00 • 4 2,286 12.69 14.00 .2.9.00 15.00 5 16,667 9.61 97.20 _ 160.20 63.00 " , • 6 15,914 9.73 115.78 154.78 39.00 7 3,452 13.46 6.45 46.45 40.00 8 1,332 19.59 26.10 26.10 . 0.00 .., . 9 1,993 25.09 0.0 50.00 50.00 0 14,925 8.38 0.0 - 1245.00 125.00 1 7,423 12.15 19.20 90.20 80.00 2 8,205 9.75 0.0 80.00 80.00 3 8,408 7.73 0.0 65.00 65.00 4 2,047 24.43 0.0 50.00 50.00 5 6,803 9.55 0.0 ,,,,65.0C) _,65.00 6 2,565 19.49 0.0 50.00 50.00 , .. „ 7 2,124 7.06 0.0 15.00 15.00 Total 118,049 10.68 . 418.80 1,260.80. 8474.09 . August 1996 Page 70 ‘/. 'it'M'iggki4g:t4rVi''K':;:a15V.tha0::.::"iN9P;'iV!.i:,'i:,a•Wit:''5"Ng;':,'-*:::','Nita,''i:S ..NQ;ViVdk:M'AZtt''Z:V.tNK*N,;Nl*:::35N;ai',-::5g''ieg-'gaNa' L.'Lf.N:',- -"'::;:'-P'?'',"'X:A-Ik :-';::i;iIs. ' '--.; '..r.-1-7,,,n'tc,f,-. ...-',. ;'2,qt;. .:i.5fiaWligigi:KIA.VZ,':'eP-4,::*rriA,T,..,',i--;-n.,:i,‘,YWRC:ij,•; :11,V-':'-'3'.'j-fr:M.;-,V5k!:?::-. College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas • The Plan will be used to locate desirable park sites before development occurs, and those sites will be purchased by the City or will be received as donations. • Parks will be co-located with future school sites. In all cases, site specific characteristics will need to be considered before the locations of parks can be finalized. In addition to the 1,260.80 acres of future "core" parkland, the Plan proposes that all of the presently undeveloped 100-year floodplains within College Station remain open space or natural areas as discussed in Section 3 Land Use Plan. These lands may be preserved in either public or private hands; however, it is recommended that the City require that developers provide an easement to the City, adjacent to the floodplain, for the construction of trails and for access of maintenance personnel and vehicles. Additional opportunities for the preservation of open space exist with the assistance of private groups such as the Nature Conservancy of Texas, the Sierra Club, or other non-profit organizations. In order to benefit from these groups, a survey will be required that identifies sites that may warrant preservation. These sites may include post oak savanna, native prairies, wetlands, or other significant natural sites. Floodplains are proposed to be linked together by open space :!! "connections" in order to complete the open space system. Because these systems are connections and do not follow any natural feature, the locations shown on the Park and Open Space Plan are general, While it is desirable that the connections be located in a manner that will incorporate some of the City's scenic elements such as ponds and forests into the system, in some cases it may be necessary that they be • located along property boundaries and public rights-of-way because of YY7,:• the difficulty associated with acquiring easements. Table No. 10 shows the individual recommended park improvements by park zone and Figure No. 17 shows the Park and Open Space Plan. In all, a total of 1,260.80 acres of"core" parkland is proposed, comprised of mini-parks, neighborhood parks,and community parics. August 1996 Page 73 College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas There are several specific areas that were reviewed during this process: • Lick Creek Park - At 515 acres, Lick Creek Park is the City's principal regional park. Because of endangered plant species and indications of prehistoric human habitation sites, Lick Creek Park has been designated by the City staff and Parks Board to remain a natural area. The City's vision for this park is to fully develop the trail system with bridges across low-lying areas and directional and interpretive markers, and to provide a visitor center for exhibits and meetings. • • Wolf Pen Creek - At this time, a revised master plan is being developed for the Wolf Pen Creek corridor. This process will be completed in 1997 and recommendations will be made at that time for additional improvements. The Land Use Plan and Urban Design Plan show this area as being integral to providing continuous off- street pedestrian and bicycle connections within the- urbanized portion of College Station. There has been an on-going City concern with silting and maintenance at the Wolf Pen Creek amphitheater. It is recommended that City staff continue to pursue •,f engineering options to address these drainage and maintenance concerns. The 1995 Park, Recreation, Open Space and Greenway Guidelines published by the NRPA recommend that projected park facility needs be based upon citizen's desires and specific regional needs. Based upon a review of current facility use and deficiencies by the Park and Recreation Advisory Board and Park's staff, the following are the projected facility needs for College Station: Basketball Courts (Indoor or Outdoor) - 1 per neighborhood park and 2 per community park. Currently, 20 basketball courts exist. • Racquetball Courts - None. It is expected that the private sector and the University will continue to provide these facilities as needed. • Tennis Courts - 60 total, including a tennis center Currently, 12 tennis courts exist. Baseball Fields (Little League) - 27 total. Currently, 9 exist serving 1300 players. Each field accommodates 150 players. Additional fields will be required in the near future as the number of players increases. • Softball Fields - 12 adult and 8 youth for a total of 20 fields. Currently, 4 adult and 4 youth fields exist. Current demand would support 6 adult and 4 youth fields. • Football Fields - 4 total. Currently, no football fields exist. • Soccer Fields - 36 total. Currently 18 soccer fields exist. • Swimming Pools (Outdoor) - 6 total. Currently, 3 outdoor swimming pools exist. August 19% Page 71 College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas • Recreation Center - 3 total. Currently, I recreation center exists. , The above facilities will support College StationsYI rojected 20 year population. P 4.04 - Park and ThePark and Open Space Plan is intended to provide the College Open Space Plan Station Parks and Recreation Advisory Board with a guide upon which to base future decisions. Following the concept of the Land Use Plan, the number of acres of parkland required per person in each park zone determines the location of that acreage on the Plan while observing the following criteria: r • Sites should be located substantially outside of the floodplain. • Neighborhood park sites should be adjacent to residential areas in a manner that serves the greatest number of users. • Neighborhood park sites should be located so that users are not required to cross major thoroughfares to access them. • Sites should be located adjacent to schools, where possible, in order to encourage both shared facilities and the potential co- development of new sites. • Sites should be located adjacent to the open space system so that connections to the trail network may be easily achieved. • Sites should not be severely sloping and should have existing trees or other scenic elements. a Parks should be developed in a way that allows for maximum visibility into the site from surrounding residential roads in order to maximize security and discourage illegal activities. • Parks should have multiple access points to facilitate access from surrounding neighborhoods. • Community parks*located within residential neighborhoods should be developed in a manner that protects the residences from objectionable light, noise and traffic. Because of the need to consider specific characteristics in the site selection process, the'park locations indicated on the Plan are general. The actual locations, { sizes, and 'number of parks will likely be determined in one of the following manners: • • The Plan will be used to determine the number of acres of parkland dedication required of developers and to regulate the best locations for those parks. August 1996 Page 72 .........:............................_....._.,,_,_......,-....,.,«„-..,..........,.....--.........-..,..... ,...-a..m.........,n..--m...,«b.......1....a...,.._...«..w.:w....:.:...:o.x,-x-:ut:x..xss:a'.r:.-.we..'tr sd:tMiiC4S:,:eeLp; •ad-.1 College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas , - 4,; ' Table No. 10 (continued) Park Park Total Parks(acres) Total Zone Name Acres Mini-Park Neighborhd. Community 6 Anderson Park -- 8.90 - 8.90 .., Bee Creek Park ..... .... 43.50 43.50 Brison Park ..... 9.20 -- 9.20 Fairview Park 1.80 ..... - 1.80 Gabbard Park -- 10.70 -- 10.70 Lemontree Park .... 15.40 - 15.40 Wayne Smith Park -- ... 26.28 26.28 Future Park"6-A" .... -- 35.00 35.00 Future Park"6-B" 2.00 -- .... 2.00 Future Park"6-C" 2.00 .... -- 2.00 Total - Zone 6 5.80 44.20 104.78 154.78 7 Woodway Park .... 6.45 __ 6.45 Future Park"7-A" -- -- 40.00 40.00 Total - Zone 7 ..... 6.45 40.00 46.45 ,..;..,,,,,,......: 8 Emerald Forest Park __ 4.50 __ 4.50 Sandstone Park ... 15.00 -- 15.00 Woodcreek Park ...... 6.60 -- 6.60 Total - Zone 8 10 I. 26.10 - 26.10 9 Future Park"9-A" ...„ __ 40.00 40.00 Future Park"9-B" ... 10.00 -- 10.00 Total - Zone 9 .... 10.00 40.00 50.00 •:..z°,i;:, 10 Future Park" 0-A" -- .._ 50.00 50.00 Future Park" 0-B" -- 15.00 -- 15.00 Future Park" 0-C" .... 15.00 -- 15.00 Future Park" 0-D" __ 15.00 -- 15.00 11 Future Park" 0-E" .... 15.00 -- 15.00 Future Park" 0-F" -- 15.00 -- 15.00 Total - Zone 10 -- 75.00 50.00 125.00 v.-.. 11 Pebble Creek Park -- 10.20 -- 10.20 Future Park"11-A" - .... 15.00 ..... 15.00 Future Park"11-B" -- 15.00 -- 15.00 ,.':.:,,..•': Future Park"11-C" ..... 10.00 .... 10.00 r .... Future Park"11-D" .... ..... 40.00 40.00 Total - Zone 11 .... 50.20 40.00 90.20 -•';-,,,--il.: '...,...tr.;.:,- ---`.. August 1996 Page 15 College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas • The Plan will be used to locate desirable park sites before development occurs, and those sites will be purchased by the City or will be received as donations. • Pirks will be co-located with future school slies. In all cases, site specific characteristics will need to be considered before the locations of parks can be finalized. In addition to the 1,260.80 acres of future "core" parkland, the Plan proposes'that all of the presently undeveloped 100-year floodplains within College Station remain open space or natural areas as discussed,in Section 3: Land Use Plan. These lands may be preserved in either public or private hands; however, it is recommended that the City require that:developers provide an easement to the City, adjacent to, the floodplain, for the construction of'trails and for access of maintenance 0i-sonnet and vehicles. . - Additional opportunities for the preservation of,open space exist with the assistance of private groups such as the Nature Conservancy of Texas, the Sierra' Club, or other non-profit organizations. In order to benefit from these groups, a survey will be required that identifies sites that may warrant preservation. These sites ,rp4.y include; post oak savanna, native prairies, wetlands, or other significant natural sites. Flopdplains are proposed to be linked togetl?er, by 'open space "connections" in order to complete the open space system. Because these systems are connections and do not folloW any natural feature, ) the locations shown on the Park and Open.Space"Plan are general, While it is desirable that the connections be located in a manner that Will incorporate iz:;me of the City's scenic elementssuch as ponds and forests into the,system, in some cases it may be necessary that they be located along property boundaries and public righ4-of-way,because of the difficulty associated with acquiring easements. . Table No. 10 shows the individual recommended,park improvements by park zone and Figure No. 17 shows the Park and.Open Space Plan. In ..; all, a total of 1,260.80 acres of "core" parkland is,:proposed, comprised of mini-parks, neighborhood parks, and community parks. • August 1996 Page 73 --y,rrc���,r•x ,•�v ?� d� xs�%�:s}�'�.,...r�y^9�?;'�.';'e "'�.'i=al�f _ -�s ..3� �i �z < '�7 �;a:s Tr-' C �j •Mswa�"u �..Y�_:r,.a," "T .�,:.,x��'��-!�q��.'..d,�,,yy_+; s c>•{..''F.i t1�,._, S;.ry.f�F��k'. n;;r s::,'frh�;� :fr..PF• r 1 �. - i,'-.ii=:` E> t .T,:C `•`S'�ci"fr-�•"-.'x`-r'3,_�;YO I '� . '�'�!-'�,a�Ir:r Vi;,,R'*�''Y:'�3t•u3'>f i.-:;•l�s�a:;-'�t#r'-�.'.:;^:F .... ,7... ! :s-s'^'_'=*�r•'�--,;�i:#� .d �is�'�s�'w'•���:�'�`:�:�...:v_:st:�i t•�.�,•�3r^"t-f a7�'�•'-�� �s:�-_ ,: .� 'n?Tib:i7,Lyy s,i i�ri;�j�'i•;.•w..: _ .� - - f .Ei: ..v.r^,rt4{{3yy:C`�3L.��51i-•i'�'i�i�ee��+i;�,., '�€�_�:.t�,=Df}�i�.''.lr' �":'.�; }='t_« v`�.�-[' °••'•'�- -f _ .4..i .�Iii? �! �'�f-:w�.' I Co re a sive Plan R1wY1S1~[7 DRAFT] :-_ College Statlnn ITt 1l St +:• _ [rtTt�€'•3: t ... :;- CI„or Cf ii ge 5tatlon Texas :�:`� = � ,'�w •,•.i�r;.^.l r.• r �. ,i., i=];1,f_• ��1-�:-i*J.... .:i•.:.ai .'-�°.,,-+ ;j':''-::7j::-.;;-:T;7;,7::•:' .:fil.. ::',:::!,:::$:: :-..'17:411,;;;4.::::-. :i,.:. -:- .: '-'ii&:•:ii.'..-' ':-........:: -:'''.'.'...':''''''::;-4.-::7-.i::'''''-'''' :---7.1....r. „11,, ikm, ,,..,-,;-_ .: .„,„,_.;_,,-__: . _. ,,:,_,_,„..ii, . ,,,..,,:. ....„-_-...-.,.... . 1 :y ,:_.--:„., ; ,Park Zone ",,,,,i4140111r __�• .�, �= _.. . A , ,c •' College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas .,-.. Table No. 10 - Future Core Parkland ( , \. . i . . Park 'Park' Total Parks(acres) Total Zone -Name.. Acres z . Mini-Park. .fseighborhd. Community . . - . • , Hensel Park - .... II.... 29.70 29.70 Future Park"I-A" ..... 20.00 ..... 20.00 Total-Zone I -- 20.00 29.70 49.70 2 Eastgate Park 1.00 .... .... 1.00 .:.: Lions Park 1.50 I.** ...... 1.50 Merry Oaks Park ..... 4.60 .... 4.60 Oaks Park . N..1. 7.50 ..... 7.50 , 5 Existing park site ...... 10.20 ..4. 10.20 Parkway Park 1.90 ...... .... 1.90 Richard Carter Park .... 7.40 .... 7.40 Thomas Park -- -- 16.10 16.10 Future Park n2- .An Future Park"2-B" , _ , __ _ .-- 35.00 35,00 35.00 35.00 Total-Zone 2 4.40 29.70 86.10 120.20 3 Central Park C --2.50 7 .Olt 47.20 --.. 47.20 Cy Miller Park 2.50 Wolf Pen Creek Park .... 19.47 . ..., 19.47 Future Park"3-A" ..... 15.00 .... 15.00 Total-Zone 3 2.50 34.47 47.20 84.17 4 ,Raintree Park' .•-- 13.00 .... 13.00 VVindvvood Park 1.00 .... .... 1.00 ( Future Park"4-A" • Total-Zone 4 -- 15.00 1.00 • 28.00 -- 15.00 .... 29.00 5 Brothers Pond Park . ..... 16.10 .... 16.10 Edelweiss Park • , -- 10.90 -- 10.90 Georgie K. Fitch Park ' -- 11.30 -- 11.30 Longmire Park .... . 4 20 ..... 4.20 Southwood Park ' .... ..... 44.70 ' 44.70 I.thJack& Dorothy Miller Park -- 10.00 --• Souwood.Park expansion (5-A) . .. , .. . 17.00 10.00 17.00 Future Park"5-B" 40.00 40.00 Future Park"5-C" 2.00 ..... ..... 2.00 Future Park"5-D" Future Park"5-E" 2.00 -- -- 2.00 2.00 --. -- 2.00 Total-Zone 5 6.00 52.50 101.70 160.20 I I •. . I ( 'h • ' August 1996 Page 74 1 -- 1 . . College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] .. . City of College Station,Texas , . . Table No. 10 (continued) Park.' : Park Total Parks(acres) Total 11 Zone Name Acres . ',. ,'.•.", '., .',.,' Islini.;Park.. .Neighborhd. Community . • , . ' 6 Anderson Park ..--.. _ . 8.90 ...._. ,,, 8.9P Bee Creek Park .... -- 43.50 , - 43.50 Brison Park.- . .... 9.20 ' -- 9.20 Fairview Park . , Gabbard Park' 1.80 ...... . 10.70 -- ..... .. ...I. 1.80 10.70 Lemontree Park -- 15.40 15.40 - - 15.40 •Wayne Smith:Park , ..... ... ' 26.28 26.28 Future Park"6-A" . - --2.00 ----.. .35.00' 35.00 Future Park"6-B" 2.0p Future Park"6-C" 2.00 .... ..... 2.00 Total -Zone 6 , 5.80 44.20 . 11)4.78 - ' 154.78 7 Woodway Park . -- 6.45 ... . ., .: ..,. .... 6.45 • Future Park"7-A" . ... .1. 40.00- ' 40.001 Total- Zone 7 ' . ..... 6.45 -40.00 . 46.45 8 . Emerald Forest Park ..... 4.50 ..... 4.50 Sandstone Park . --. 15.00 15.00 -- .Woodcreek Park -,, , ... 6.60 ... ' 6.60 Total-Zone 8 __ 26.10 -- ; . 26.10 9 Future Park"9-A" , , ...... .... 40.00 . ' 40.00 „......., fk ) Future Park."9-B". . ..... 10.00. 10.00 . ,. 'Total - Zone.9 ,,. , ..,,. , .,., 10.00 40.00 , 50.00 10 Future Park"10-A" --. ,,. .. , . ..... 50.00' Future Park"10-B"- , . -- , .., _ 15.00 . -- , . 15.00 ,Future Park"10-C" -- 15.b0 , . , 15. , , . . Future Park"10-D" ..-- 15.00 00 ...., - 15.00 Future Park"10-E" .... 15.00 ... 15.00 Future Park"10-F" ..... 15.00 .... 15.00 Total -Zone 10 --. 75.00 10.20 50.00 125.00 11 Pebble Creek Park -- 10.2010.20 Future Park"11-A" - .... 15.00 .... 15.00 Future Park"11-B" -- 15.00 -- 15.00 Future Park"11-C" 10.00 --. -- 10.00 Future Park"11-D" .... -- 40.00 40.00 Total - Zone 11 -- 50.20 40.00 90.20 .,: i .. 1 . , , I 1 . August 1996 . Page 75 . - ..._ . •....... , College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas I Table No. 10 (continued) ( Park .Park Total Parks (acres) Total Zone Name Acres .Mini..Park: •Nelghborhd. Community 12 Existing park site -- 15.00 .... 15.€0 Future Park"12-A" -- -- 50.00 50.00 Future Park"12-B" .... 15.00 --. 15.00 Total-Zone 12 -- 30.00 50.00 80.00 13 Future Park"13-A" ..... 50.00 50.00 Future Park"13-B" __ 15.00 -- 15.00 Total- .' one 13 .._ 15.00 50.00 65.00 14 Future Park"14-A" - .... 40.00 40.00 Future Park"14-B" -- 10.00.00 ' -- 10.00 Total- Zone 14 - 10.00 40.00 50.00 .. �� 50.00 `50. D15 Future Park"15-A` Future Park"15- " �- 15.00 -�.... 15.00 Total-Zo 15 .w_ 15.00 50.00 65.00 16 Future Park"16-A" 40 NM ........ 40.00, 40.00 Future Park"16-B" _- 10.00 -_ ' 10.00 Total-Zone 16 -- 10.00 40.00 54,00 M.- -.15.00 .. 15.00 17 :: Future Pari"17-A" .... 15.00 �,� -- � � � 15.00 TotalZane 17 ( ' TOTAL 19.70 471.62 769.48 - '1,260.80 r w_...M....__�,�..._».-..-.�....-...__.._..r.<-_._..,...__...., ....-....»........-,..-..--..v_-......._.._..-,_..o-�--._..m.._....-.....- �....-,�..b�....�._.........,.._-,-_..,.,......_.,-«..--.«......._.-..�n.,.._.�-._-..,. �..............,-,,.w..�-.,.M.._......f.�. __ .........,, _..._._._ »_�._._.._.,....._.....p........w.... ....„-..._-_.......•-_..-,__,-..._.._m�.-..�,,.,..r.w-.....�.....a....._.__......... �.._.._ __._......_-u. [Note: Afuture Athletic Complex may be developed either as a part of a future coinmunity park or as a separate regional pat*" • 4 • . ( ' ' August 1996 '' Page 76 College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas Mini-Park Improvements A total of 19.7 acres (1.6%) are dedicated to mini-parks. The existing 6 mini-parks - Eastgate, Lions, Parkway, Cy Miller, 'Windwood, and Fairview -comprise 9.7 acres. Five new 2-acre mini-parks are added for a total of 11 mini-parks (an additional 10 acres). The City's current policy is to minimize the designation of mini-parks due to the high costs associated with equipping and maintaining numerous small parks. It is recommended that in College Station, new mini-parks be limited to developed areas that have no available land for larger facilities, but that do not currently have adequate park acreage. In undeveloped areas, the acreage that would have been set aside for mini-parks should be added to the acreage of the new neighborhood parks. Neighborhood Park Improvements A total of 471.62 acres (37.4%) are dedicated to neighborhood parks. The 20 existing neighborhood parks - Merry Oaks, Oaks, Undeveloped Park Site, Richard Carter, Wolf Pen Creek, Raintree, Brothers Pond, Edelweiss, Georgie K. Fitch, Longmire, Jack & Dorothy Miller, Anderson, Brison, Gabbard, Lemontree, Woodway, Emerald Forest, Sandstone, Woodcreek, and Pebble Creek- comprise 216.62 acres. Eighteen new neighborhood parks are added for a total of 38 neighborhood parks (an additional 255 acres). New neighborhood parks are proposed in park zones 1, 3,4, and 9-17. It is recommended that future neighborhood parks. be 10 to 15 acres in size in order to provide fewer park sites to equip and maintain which is in accordance with existing policy. Community Park Improvements A total of 769.48 acres (61.0%) are dedicated to community parks. The 6 existing community parks - Hensel, Thomas, Central, Southwood, Bee Creek, and Wayne Smith - comprise 207.48 acres. One existing community park is proposed to expand by 17.0 acres. Thirteen new community parks are added for a total of 19 community parks (an additional 545 acres). New community parks are proposed in park zones 2, 5,6, 7, and 10-16. Regional Park Improvements It is recommended that the City preserve all of the 100 year floodplain as open space connectors in order to develop a regional trail network to link new developments as well as existing and future parks. In the development of regional parks, it is also recommended that the City continue to find opportunities to preserve wetlands, native prairie sites, post oak savanna's and other natural and ecologically significant areas for regional parks. , August 1996 Page 78 • College Station Comprehensive Plan (REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas it is also recommended that the City continue to implement many of the recommendations of the Brazos 2020 study such as making open • space and trail linkages along Carter Creek into Bryan. Athletic Complexes In College Station, little league baseball has been growing at a.rate equal to the population growth, and soccer has been growing at a rate higher than the population. This growth 114s placed a great strain on the existing park facilities and created a need far a new athletic complex. It is recommended 'that any new athletic complex be adjacent to non- residential land uses; or if located adjacent to residential uses, large vegetative buffers should be provided between the complex and the surrounding residential use. A suitable location for this 150 usable acre facility is being studied by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and the City will acquire the most suitable site for this facility within the. next two years. Golf Courses At the present,there is no municipal golf course within College Station. Golfing facilities are located on the main campus of the University, at Pebble Creek, a commercial driving range on SH 6, and a par 3 golf. course on SH 6. The Pebble Creek course is proposed to be expanded in the near future. There are no indications at this time that a municipal golf course is needed. However, should the demand surface, it is. recommended that the City,consider purchasing some of the floodplain and floodprone areas along either Carter Creek or Lick Creek for a future-golf course. A minimum of 150 to 200 acres would be needed, depending on the course's layout • 4.05 - Potential Once future park and open space sites have been identified, it is Impkni6nEatiorland important to develop ameans to implement the Plan. The City of Funding Strategies* College Station currently has the following means of acquiring parkland and open space: Park Dedication,- At the time of platting, developers are required to dedicate park land as identified by the Comprehensive Plan and . as directed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and City Council (I acre per 133 dwelling units as per the Subdivision Regulations Ordinance). The advantage to this method is that it parkland is provided at no cost to the City. The disadvantage is that the land may not be where it is most needed and individual dedications result in small, scattered parks. 4 , • Cash in Lieu of Land ,,At the time pf platting, developers may be able to make a.cash, payment as fie'termined by the City instead of land dedication. The advantage to' :this method is that the City has more flexibility in assembling parcels and developing parks. The disadvantage is that the cash payment must be spent within 2 years and must be used within the park zone where the development is occurring. August 1996 Page 79 .•. , .• ...• `," College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas Property Purchase- If there is a specific parcel of land the City is interested in, it may choose to purchase it outright at market value. The advantage to this method is that the City gets the parcel it desires. The obvious disadvantage is that it is a cost to the City. • Gifts - Occasionally, local residents may give or will land for public use. The advantage to this method is that land is acquired free-of- charge. The disadvantage is that the land may not fit in with the Park and Open Space Plan. • Easements - To preserve park trails or perimeter park roads, the City may place a easement on the site. Access to the easement would be required regardless of future development. While this does preserve land for future park use, easements tend to be narrow and are usually purchased. • Federal/State Funding - Programs and funding for park development are available through various State and Federal agencies such as the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department and the US Army Corps of Engineers. There is usually a fair amount of competition for State and Federal funding with no guarantees applications will be accepted. State and Federal funding usually is accompanied by additional requirements in order to qualify. • Public/Private Partnerships - Working together with private interests, either non-profit or for-profit, a city can jointly develop new park sites. However, partnering may require the city to give up some of its rights or uses to the land (restricted hours, user fees, etc.). • Co-Development - Developers of parks and playgrounds tend to be cities, counties, the State, schools, and churches. Many cities have successfully co-developed parks with these entities, resulting in a synergistic approach to park development Private Parks - Some cities have allowed the privatization of their parks which are, in turn, run by private corporations. Fort Worth's Arc Park - a large softball/baseball complex - is an example of a private park. To implement the Park and Open Space Plan, it is recommended that. the City consider the following recommendations: • Implement the Comprehensive Plan - While this may seem an obvious suggestion, cities often pass plans with no thought towards implementation. Should a proposed future development not be in . compliance with the Plan, the City should require the proposed developer to conform with the Comprehensive Plan, including the locations of potential park sites. The City may also negotiate with the developer to provide alternate sites which meet the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board's goals. It is important to coordinate park locations and access points between adjacent developments as . well as within individual developments. This process of "master plan approval"will be further discussed in this report. August 1996 Page 80 1 . . . . , • , College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas 1 . Set Park•Dedication Standards - Instead of accepting small 1 . parcels of land through parkland dedication, the city and parks t- Board could determine the most appropriate locations for parks by • type in each zone and require full or pro-rata dedication of each site ' 1 atthe time of platting. T:ismeho dpresumeshatdevielopment wilialwaysproceeti: adiectionwhereparkiandisidettifiedand needed. Ihsorcase : pakswiilbenecessarypriorto development of adjacent properties. . . • Set Standards for Gift Acceptance - The City should set reasonable standards for accepting property and real estate donations for park use. 'Donations that are too small or are in inconvenient ilocationt may not serve the City in the most efficient manner. . Escrow "Cash in Lieu of Land" - The "cash in lieu of land" 1 , ' method has been favored by many cities for quite some time. . ,. Developers also favor this approach because developable land is not relinquished and costs'.can- be passed onto individual property 1 . . buyers. -,The trick is to amass enough cash within the two-year requirement to make. any. significant parkland purchases. It is H ' suggested that the City escrow these funds in an interest-bearing account in order to increase their buying power: In the short-term, / . the City would advance itself the needed "seed" funding to build parks sooner. It is recommended that the City investigate whether money can escrow'for a period longer than two years in order to I . allow more money to accumulate. . Evaluate Parkland Dedication Requirements - The City . ( • should aggressively use the provision in the Subdivision Regulations \. . that allows the City to be reimbursed .through the Parkland Dedication Ordinance for parkland acquisition and development. 1 • PuirChase.Through.Capital Improvement Program/Bonds - For particularly significant park projects, the City should consider the'efficacy of outright'purchases. CIP issues are often politically- . , , • i . • sensitive and'approval s, not guaranteed. Funds from the general I , . . '• • cit},1bUdget may impact the City's ability to purchase other needed items. The City can also-obtaii, reimbursement for capital expenses through future parkland dedications. . . „ . , ' • . '•: 'Establish Open Space Easements - For park trails, greenbelt • connections, and perimeter park roads, the City should consider the.use of easements. The'Thoroughfare Plan should also be used . ,. to' identify roads:,adjacent to parks to define the park's perimeter, • '' . ' ' . rather thanlocating backyards against the park edge. By keeping the park edge visible and accessible, its value, visual character, and security can:be enhanced.' This type of development can enhance 'th .value of properties fronting on the parkland. , , • , • . .,,. ., ,• ,,,.;, ••,.. . • •. : : - ' i‘ ','‘' : 'i..Apply. for Federal/State Funding .- While it may require a • • . .,•: .. •. degree Of,, ni grantsanShip,,, the City should not rule out Federal and : . State grants for ofk!'deVetopirient Given the uncertain nature of i: • ' their.'-availability, ' 'these sources should, be pursued with the knowledge that there is great competition for them. .. . August 1996 . , Page 81' • , , ........".".." ••• . , . „.. . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . ..• • . , . . , • , , . . , . • , . .,...... . . . . ,. . . . . . . . , . . . , . . . . . . . . . , . , • . . , . . . . . . . . „. . „.. . . . F . . . . . , , . " -..". - • . .„. _ . , . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . : . ..,• . . . . ‘•••••• •••,...: . . , 1 . . . , College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] „ City of College Station,Texas 1 • Public/Private Partnerships - The City should work with groups like the Nature Conservancy and the Sierra Club to determine if partnering opportunities are appropriate. The City must take care '.., to assure that the rights of its own taxpayers are not compromised 1 by any restrictions that might be required by the association. • Co-Development - The City should consider park co- development principally with the school district. This approach is more appropriate for the development of mini-parks, neighborhood parks and community parks. • Private Parks - The City should be careful of privatizing its park system. This may be viewed as a "loss" of municipal services by residents. Private parks may be considered on an individual basis, based on the location/type of facility proposed and the proposal's merit. However, the loss of municipal control may lead to reduced levels of service for the citizens. ( I . , i .. • August 1996 Page 82 ._. . .._ ___......_ ..._, College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas APPENDIX D CITY PARK MASTER PLAN ISSUES D.0 I Issues The following are the top five Park Master Plan issues from the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, Park Staff, and the City Council: What changes, if any, do you recommend for the PARD? Council: 1) Combine activities, such as Open House and Christmas Lighting ceremony 2) Be more involved in tourism and convention attraction 3) More passive type programs and activities 4) Look for ways to save money 5) Broaden age range of participation activities Staff: I) Restructure department to include tourism and other functions (separate Forestry and Horticulture) 2) Approval of new programs and facilities to include evaluation of total package 3) Additional districts within the City 4) Programs to combat social ills/problems 5) Approve and follow master plan What changes, if any, do you recommend for the PARD Board? Council: I) Seek a range of age, expertise, and demographics 2) Establish a calendar (schedule of Board work) 3) Orientation for new Board members and tours of parks; more members 4) Market/monitor OP Board programs related to PARD 5) More interactive role with park users Board: 1) Orientation for new members and park tours annually 2) Seek a variety of ages, demographics, and expertise for Board; r-4 Provide liaison to other significant organizations 3) Citizen surveys at least every two years for input 4) Work more closely with Bryan/TAM/Brazos County and other governmental agencies 5) Be a more pro-active Board. Neighborhood Parks: Council: I) Increased safety and security measures; area lighting on trails and playgrounds 2) Communication centers (Kiosks) for information about City '41* 3) Water play features for kids where appropriate 4) Seating in conversational groupings 5) More open spaces and play equipment August 1996 Page D-1 cinsn=zmmgmwatnaasuaaniamw.....---__ ...................................................... .. .......................................................................................................... .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. .................................... • College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] r City g of College Station,Texas ... i z; Board: I) More flowers, shade trees, grass, native plants, irrigation ' systems, use of water features .ma 2) Increase security and safety measures , 3) Active and passive leisure areas in the same park. z 4) Area lighting for trails and playgrounds 5) More shelters tiA & 4 I) . Aesthetically pleasing areas 2) All playgrounds safe; handicap accessible including bridges and trails 3} Appropriate funds for maintenance of grounds 4) More staff for care/ ecurity/payphones/security lighting 5) Neighborhood involvement planning, maintenance, operation, vandalism ' community Parks: 'Council» • I) More space for,mini-cultural events 2) Water features and fountains 3) Areas,for activities such as kite flying, model plane flying, etc. 4) ' Hike, bike,and nature'trails ' 5) Basketball,tennis courts, ballf College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas Board: I) Historical Appreciate Site/Heritage park 2) Inter-connected hike and bike trails with the City bikeway •E: system 3) Public plaza 4) Community-wide landscape with an abundance of trees 5) landscape of major vehicular corridors/senior citizen facility/joint city-school park projects StaM I) Wolf Pen - expand and finish Phase I; more restrooms 2) Wolf Pen -fully developed with Conference Center, museum, library,water sculpture, botanical garden/education features, and accessible to handicapped 3) Recreation Center- large with indoor pool attached to athletic park 4) Lick Creek development 5) Barbara Bush Park/Gardens Recreation Programs: Council: I) Community Centers similar to Lincoln Center 2) Teen center"disco" bar for 14-18 year olds 3) Outward Bound type programs 4) Make athletic programs more self-supporting 5) Programs for senior citizens Board: I) River walk 2) Family programs 3) Community Gardens 4) Programs for teens, other than sports 5) Senior programs, such as Olympics Staff: I) Expand after-school care programs; combine with teen center r;-•• to include 7th grade;target at-risk teens in middle and junior high school 2) City administer all youth sports; concentrate on pre-teen programs 3) Solicit more conference and tournaments 4) Operation of more youth centers 5) Increase programs for underprivileged youth in their neighborhoods August 1996 Page D-3 0,r- ..................................................................................................................................... ................ .............................. • �. College Station Comprehensive Plan [REVISED DRAFT] City of College Station,Texas Collaboration: "'ouncil o..r I) BISDICSISD Olympic size pool and recreation center 2) TAMU - art in the park 3) TAMU - Park facility west of Welborn Road to serve student population 4) Apply I for grants with other organization;fund raising for specific needs 5) TAMU - Historic Home Park Board: I) Work with A 11 for River Park, Prairie Farm, camping, botanical gardens 2) Develop Barbara Bush Park 3) B/CS joint facility 4) Economic Development Council Brazos Valley 5) Promote tourism with Chamber of Commerce and Convention Visitors Bureau Staff: 1 Work with planners, architects, etc. 2) TAMU - recreational sports/facilities/zoo 3) CSISD - property usage 4) -Community-wide bulletin board "electronic marquee" 5) Coordinate inter-and intra-departmentally on marketing and promotion 1 1 r[t`1yA i { August 1996 Page D-4 3 ,�*.•n x•17.: -•;w;.�..;..•w'*.•.Ni•.!+C::{w.�Y:!{IrY!.�.11Y.:.r.l•i-.'.'�.h:wr...w.{.'..•.t w�f..'.nl'�Y��h:- .. ................................... ...................................... s i 1 i I r •i! �1 �,If� t• i-I - l��� .t.• ,� a r. � .. •.r ii'�j', T 1'_ �i , • • ....., ...... .... �...... a.. , ...., .':: { .1 1 r •I li` "' r•.:: 11 .......... it . t 1 s >. r ,•.••.. ' � �.• •...i.��. •�„i 11� •1..�.,.. .:,•. ,fi.. i 1. ',� a y':��",'.(( •.!1":i tfi ,r•a;��:i'��..".:..' t - S • .� .1 .. ��..w>. f ., , �1.. .-..�:..,4 k...• :,,. r!' :r.:' Vit, - [.�1{• i={ ,.�I• �:7e�' 'r�. :,'s,"• 1. p i,,•: ':ter- '!i' F. .{.,i � a ,r. •, .f•)1 a -1.�:�. �' S 1 ! 4 ii. i :ii � . :f' 1•'•'f 1[ 4'it ,. ''I'� tdrPrip:i,:,;•:Q,Trxtk7rt.�+ ,,.y ii.i' 3• •, 1i f 1�'��� g f .+ , � 'a 1� .!q:�. vY ��nn _ 11 a • .t t s, r' t' .r i x •1...ill r . , , � ��',:, ff� Bvx,9968' . � ast ce �:�� exas' rrenue a5i r:� 'r'e`p•• sx ... . .,. .. - • 1 ..'., 1 �Ii, � Cci�e a�tat�vn�;Texas 4Q 3 7643588 • August 21, 1996 Dr. John L. Crompton 1000 Rose Circle College Station,Texas 77840 Dear John: Thank you for your recent letter concerning financial conditions associated with the College • Station-Bryan Swim Club w I. fully understand•the problems inherent with the operation of a competitive swim club and recognize the importance of maintaining this service. Therefore, I am waiving the•pool fees that had previously•.been agreed to. This should help the club regain sound ;i financial standing without adverse impact upon the•membership.. • • . • • I ask that the club provide assistance to:our staff ini any way,possible to reduce••our overall costs to• • • operate the pools for this program. `I:he•continued..cooperation.of coaches,.swimmers, and parents is essential to the smooth operation of our crowded••facilities. The aquatics'staff will appreciate your efforts in this area. We will be reviewing•our user.fee structure in.the near future. As..part of that process,•the City • . Council may reconsider the current Pees Policy Statement as it applies to third party agencies and organizations that are supported by the City:as well as.fees charged to participants in:our internal • • • • • • programs. This may necessitate some type of reimbursement or direct fee•by the club.in the future. I will notify you of any meetings or actions related to this once they are known. •.+•tip • I hope that the combined.effort between the City and the club will result in a stronger overall program.that better serves•our citizens. Thank you for your tireless efforts on behalf of the swim club. The benefits to the youth and to the community are considerable. • Since ely 4 i f • , l f 1 Steve Beachy Director, dir Parks and Recreation copies: Skip Noe, City Manager Parks &Recreation Staff Home of Texas A&M University .................................................. ................ ,co ❑ oo 000 Q d COLLEGE STATION BRYAN AQUATICS Mr. Steve Beachy 1000 Rose Circle Director, Parks and Recreation College Station, TX 77840 College Station Dear Steve, The Board of the College Station- Bryan Swim Club have asked me to contact you requesting that the city waive pool/lifeguard fees incurred by the club's use of city pool facilities in the past few months and also that all such pool/lifeguard fees be waived in the future. As you are aware, the club has had free use of the Texas A& M pools for most of the past 10 years. The dues structure and the coaches' salaries have been predicated on that premise. Over the past three or four months, it has become obvious that the club does not have the capacity to remain financially viable if it is required to pay the pool/lifeguard fees accessed by the city. if the club is requested to pay pool and/or lifeguard fees, then financial survival can only be achieved by imposing both substantial dues increases and cuts in our coaching staff. Either of these actions would result in a down-grading of the program which is contrary tot e goals of both the city and the club. • We believe there is precedent for this request, and that waiving of these pool/lifeguard fees would be consistent with existing city policy. For example, Little League are not charged for the use of the Southwood Park complex, even though the city's maintenance and operation costs for that facility exceed $10,000 per year. Just as the Little League fields cannot be used unless they are well maintained, so the pool can not be used without lifeguards. The role of maintenance people and lifeguards in these two contexts is similar in that they are the key to children being able to use the facility. The city's willingness to adopt the College Station -Bryan Swim Club is much appreciated. We look forward to working with you over next few years to gradually integrate it into the City's existing swim programs. We perceive the waiving of pool/lifeguard fees to be critical to furthering this goal, and would be very appreciative if you are able to grant this request. • r John L. Crompton President College y1► TfC] rf' r • College Station IndependentSchool District; x� � ,..4._......C'.... ...:.:w.. rZ:'ox..._...,��:°�°,.� _.a+a. _._^, �.�. ,-�,,.r�, a:.e• ;a,�". ��er:: wi rP:;'.6�.t �+�-...����,a','.j.•F" .- p�«:mp vib.�' ... ::aeq .:^��"[ °%"' :=T •[4.a.. - .t�!',f ,�� � ;.`` 1101 Williams 409-764-5565 College StatiOn,TX 77840 August 14, 1996 City of College Station Dept.of Parks and Recreation 1000 Krenek Tap Rd. • College Station,TX 77840 • Dear Sir: Thank you very much for your'donation of the gift.certificat for one family swim pass,to. our Scarecrow Festival.. We are looking forward to'a very successful Festival this year thanks to you and many other genenous community-minded benefactors. The PTO,and especially the children of College Hills Elementary School,appreciate your thoughtful contribution. Sincerely, Marty Gittings, Donations Committee • • • ROBERT GARNER JIM SCALES,Ph.D. Principal Superintendent of Schools MEMORANDUM { DATE: August 14, 1996 TO: Mr. Steve Beachy FROM: Carissa Blair Aquatics Office RE: Customer Concerns About Southwood Valley Pool Hours CC: Vera Solis In response to the patrons that wrote to us with their concerns about the closing . of Southwood Valley Pool, I have prepared a personalized letter informing them of Southwood Valley's new pool hours. Enclosed with the letter is a flyer listing the pool hours for all College Station pools. I have also personally contacted those patrons who provided phone numbers. Those that I have spoken to are thrilled that Southwood will stay open during the weekdays -they greatly appreciated the efforts we made! Enclosed is a copy of the letter the patrons sent to Vera, a copy of the letter I am sending to the patrons, and a copy of the new swimming pool flyer. • CITY OF COLLEGE STATION : s - � Post Office Box 9964 1101 Texas Avenue College Station,Texas 77842-9964 (409)7643544 Ms. Kristina M. Parker 3303 Bahia Drive College Station, Texas 77845 August 14, 1996 Dear Ms. Kristina M. Parker, We would like to extend a sincere thank you for your letter concerning the early closing of Southwood Valley Swimming Pool. The Aquatics Department reviewed all aspects of the situation and have decided to keep Southwood Valley Pool open during the weekdays until September 15th. The hours during the weekdays will be from 9 -- 12 noon and 5:30 - 8 pm. Hours for Saturdays and Sundays will be from 12 noon- 7 pm. For your convenience I have enclosed a flyer listing the newswimming pool hours for all City of College Station swimming pools. Once again, we do appreciate your comments and suggestions. Ify ou have other concerns regarding the city pools, please feel free to contact us at any time. We openly p y welcome any suggestions that may better the swimmingpool's operations. We hope that p the new Southwood Valley pool hours will be of some benefit to you and your family. Sincerely, Vera Solis Aquatics Director rt .,f 0:_xaas A&M University • . . , pARks & RECREATION •..:'r.'''''', Co 11 EqE STATiON 0 0 t PooI t,.. _. ':', -..„ .,' r S, r',• ., ^V•• P , '1.• , ''':''''''r"',.,':',, '''';: r:::, :',11:II:',' '•-* :::, :.i. ',4, '''' .,,1,, , •• • i , •, ' ,- .• ‘ .= •,:,, • ••,.: t •;• ,j• "-.,: ',,,::: ',''''' ',': ',:: :,,,,,••,, ':.:. 'ii:,. '.,, 11' •,. • ' ,,,• e ..., .•• Southwood Pool .... , . ..... .. . ,. .., ...:!:.....:.:.. ,, :;,,...,,! will stay open, for the following weekend dates: ....... . ...„,...., ,.. . ..... . ,,:.. ...... . August 24, 25, 31 and ... L :• ,:. • .. .. .... . .., „..... .. September 1 , 79 89 14, 15 ::,.:..,.. ...„..„_..i.:...:, .: .:,....,::, 12 noon - 7 pm for General Public ....,.,.. ,.. ...:),..,,.. .,.: _. _..„.. ......... . August 19th - September 15th , .. ,,......,.., .„ .. .. ,:-. „ _.. . ...„ Monday - Friday, 9 am - 12 noon, General Public .... .., ... .. ..„::.„,. 5:30 pm - 8 pm, General Public Entryfee: $1.50 per person, (3 years and older) .. .,. )College Station Indepen . ent School District • :.. Natatorium will be open Monday - Friday: . ..,, . .. • • .... - , .... •.. ..... .• .. . August 19th - November 30th ,-, 5:30 - 6:30 am for Adult Lap Swim September 16th - November 30th 7 pm - 8 pm for General Public September 21st - November 30th Saturday Hours: 12 noon - 5:00 pm for General Public Entry Fee: S2.00 per person (3 years and older) Adamson Lagoon will be open the following weekends: August 249 25, 31 September1 , 7, 8, 14, 15 ) 12 noon - 7 pm Entry Fee: $3.00 per person (3 years and older) . For more information call: 764-3773 July 13, 1996 Ms. Vera Solis College Station Parks and Recreation Dept. Central Park Krenek Tap Road College Station, TX 77840 Dear Ms. Solis, I just wanted to let you know how upset I was when I read that Southwood Valley pool would be closing on August 18. I'm sure you realize that that is the middle of the hottest part of the year here, and temperatures each day for the 6 weeks following that date would most likely be at or above 100 degrees. I can't understand why a pool in this state would . be closed that early in the season. Even in Ohio, where we moved from last year, all pools are open until Labor Day. Our family really appreciated being able to swim at Southwood Valley pool last Sept., both during the morning and evening hours, and there were a lot of other people using it also during those blistering 100 degree days. I hope that the reason for closing the pool so early is not because you think people are going to want to be swimming at the Natatorium. Who wants to swim inside when it is 100 degrees outside? And, more importantly, the Natatorium is not a place for families with children under the age of 8. It is no fun for kids or parents to swim in a place where they can't touch bottom. The water temperature in the Natatorium is also kept too cold for kids. I hope you and the City of College Station can find a way to keep Southwood Valley pool open daily until at least mid-Sept. When I bought our family season swim pass at the • beginning of June I assumed we would still be using it during the hottest part of the summer. It will be a great disservice to College Station Wit and the other pools are allowed to close before summer is even close to being over. • Best regards, • gaA,U1-4i VAT-V,Laf:X.,ik Laura Hudock 3402 Bahia Dr. College Station, TX 77845 693-6377 ) Ms. Vera Solis Director of Aquatic Recreation College Station Parks and Recreation Department 1000 Krenek Tap Road College Station, Texas 77840 August 7, 1996 Dear Ms. Solis: We, the undersigned, are writing to express our desire for the outdoor City pools to remain open for a longer season. We would like the outdoor pools to be open, this fall, during the month of September and thru mid-October, for the same hours they have been open during the rest of the summer. Additionally we think that the outdoor pools should open, in the spring, in mid-May. The temperatures during these months render outdoor recreation, other than swimming, difficult during the day here in College Station. Young children, in particular, need the opportunity for daily outdoor physical activity. Many of us with two or more small children are unable to take them to the Natatorium safely, due to the lack of an area safe for young children. We are glad to know that the pool we most often use, Southwood Pool,will now be opened on weekends after August 18th. The Southwood Pool is a wonderful resource many of us greatly appreciate. However,the policy of closing the pool on weekdays during September and early October, this season, leaves many of us very few alternatives for outdoor activity here in College State on those upcoming hot days. We appreciate your consideration of our request to keep the outdoor City pools open longer, and hope that you will reconsider the present policy. Sincerely, 6/./jCv.P `.�wi rJM .S Aff4citkivir- C-- (vil .3v 1 4,7„a,te cii 4t,(clic. e,5,--, 1 7,7,-5-. 1,-e:-- C9- L r. 01 80/ l 2S::rs c',r .. ‘ . i --YIC-1/1 60\--Lf OR , EIS (,-Ft 3- ( 3'r) ' .: L,cs1/4.,L,c0„ \-\0 occ-k---- ,c), , r _ . 3 i r (An,tA. •kt h LN. C _f-. 1,ci 3_53 7 5.77z. 1 '„ , - -2, k,? (Y\ u c:V rl c.\ L Y.\ ' (I-1-1 : 1 eal ( '.::'..X\, '1‘. (-fii.;(1 (”- j ci - -- - ______,, c, . . 7(cm ( )-04 kj 6 i?Vcd-Of V 7 i ..-71-' / /Z/0 0 -''' . A/frie??7,:-!-':-/Z)6,../ i1f .412-(4 0, a Oct,t,,I.-e,e-i--- s /-----, ,,,, C-Th .,,t -:-.-' ti ,_ IL. -2 iz:. k :\ ,,_„ _,,,,.. , _, I.,...fi r (-- ----7,--,1.• f r- 7.-- cr- „..,, ( , , - ,,,,)_,u1,,,,,\ .(r: L.,. • f,_ - ; - f/C)'•4-# - 1 ::).l') 'f;5 47/11.1 ?'��r A i{i{It '”6 --- i f .) 0 iti, / 0 Y11 - .-.1� , f 1 i -,i j I ►.w. � f W <-d'j\l/1.)-- -,,h-fl\ vf - lo 0 0.j_., o \ ' (25(� ,;;✓L- am..' n . 1 I 1 \-4--)'„), 0 ,,,,,,,f(i„__,-1-g2 4- -c-, \ I 1 '0 6) Ci' ' ir ' \-i \C\C.\N'V-T , 1 A- .., �� c t\S 1- /--. I' '---,c'-0711/Cr .?< t _ 1°69 V OV\ , . _7. -7 O.\ �- ___,P.tAt 4 I- --- h 0-1-)3-- o) . c,,,D 10\ 4- ,re)2,,\,. _,,,,,,,:c, Ili , . wxycj 0.9-rif*-- 0 1_,6z. Z.- ._ I .<7.7, -') '...i,4,-----S ,..) ,r c, ri, tt, ,YP - ‘:7 h r' c.„.k.,L),L-1--- . . 3 ) ' ,,,,1 e9 u 7,Le.,- 1 1.A' (I) 11"WI r att .,_ - "(--Th?.1 • :). 1cf.) . . --' , , 5. 0 1.;\ i . . , _...,------., ..-07S1--'v vit,,, ,,,A c.,2 . r,j )) '') i \JAArvi y( ,,, - e.,) \,...A..4-6A, , 0 - ,, if , , ' ‘, � V- rkv I f-ck-s4\171 '4\01. 1si,a. ,„., `. ! ,. 00-) r ti V -,,,, ,...) r, - . r c4Lt--- --6-0-1D , j\jf�tfj�J, 0,,,,,. ���f,\f- . is-n A, ,, ,y0.-v. . <. --, , . „., a)(11726:- c ti c 1-7ZL--'. f\t‘ ,,' \,fra,-V‘ 64 s ult 'V kyllr-6-‘-yoy ;\ ClaClea- t_J .,-1' • -4,00 - ii,,c' '1" <r' :),:::„‘gr)--L.'0'61-1-- c„,,,,,41-vic-f-4',2D ` •C-0 ,, ,--./ — ' 51, /A, G,r)--)wt ,(Y\ 6 ' L? -,Afr\-C9\--)-( (7):\,sc)- .10(7),) ') i iv -(31 I'. ' - --v-OtQfc6\3 \-) ‘ .• \,'>' f Yr1-1-'1 i Q S'1--.-E-- 5- n ,,,,,,-,,,,,„-(0,-,-(3-0-) ho (.. k., ..,-,Af-voorc \rfq, 0 ',. ' t -,-S-2, -9---(II-. , rrt IT ' ' F C I...LEGE STATION PARKS & RECRE,10; POST OFFICE BOX 9960 COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS 77842-9960 (409)764-3773 • MEMORANDUM TO: Parks & Recreation Board FROM: Steve Beachy, Director of Parks & Recreation DATE: September 5, 1996 RE: Items of Interest I. The Texas Amateur Softball Association District 30 Staff and the College Station and Bryan Parks & Recreation Departments successfully hosted the 1996 ASA Men's Class "C" Fast Pitch National Championships this past weekend. 57 teams from across the United States played 113 games at the Central Park Softball Complex in College Station and the Larry Alan Parker Softball Fields in Bryan. The top men's fast pitch softball teams from across the country competed for the 1996 ASA National Championship. The following states were represented; Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Tennessee, Ohio, Indiana, Pennsylvariia, New Jersey, New York, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Kansas, Missouri, New Mexico, Arizona, California, Oregon, Washington, South Dakota, Utah, Colorado, Maryland, Nebraska, Nevada and Illinois. There were over 1,500 visitors to B/CS associated with this ASA National Softball Tournament- players,tournament staff,family's and guests. As with any outdoor venue, rain delayed the start of this tournament 24 hours. The ballfield crews and P&R staff members took our hospitality to new heights by preparing the ball-fields in 5 hours after more than a week of rain. It is without a doubt, the quality of people in B/CS, that make these beneficial community events so successful. Looking ahead: 1997 will bring the ASA Men's 40+ Fast Pitch Nationals to B/CS with 70 - 80 teams expected. The dates are August 20 - 24, 1997. This November we will be bidding for 1998 ASA National Tournaments in St. Louis, Missouri. We provide good things in life! APPLICATION FOR CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PARKS & RECREATION BOARD APPOINTED ADVISORY COMMITTEES NOTE: As an applicant for the City of College Station Advisory Committee, your name, address, and phone number will be available to the press and the public. All other information will remain confidential. Applications remain on file for a period of two years or until the applicant receives an appointment. Incumbents whose terms expire and who are eligible for reappointment will be sent a new application prior to the expiration date. Please type or print clearly NAME: U.V 101011,5 TELEPHONE: 6 f • ADDRESS: (Residence) 76 Ugt /IA (Mailing) ? I have lived in College Station 3 9 years. DO YOU RESIDE WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF COLLEGE STATION? e)ES NO VOTER REGISTRATION NO. OCCUPATION OR AREA OF EXPERTISE: h hie 6 Of retired, please indicate former occupation or profession). EDUCATION (Optional): PROFESSIONAL AND/OR COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: ADDITIONAL PERTINENT INFORMATION/REFERENCES: PLEASE INDICATE THE COMMITTEE YOU ARE INTERESTED IN SERVING. (List in order of preference) 0 Conference Center Advisory Committee 121-;ncoln Center Advisory Committee (Signature of Applicant (Date) APPLICATIONS FOR PARKS :OARD APPOINTED COMMITTEES ARE KEPT ON FILE AT THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OFFICE (764-3414). Please indicate if you have served on a board/commission/committee and the years served. Name of Board/Commission/Committee Dates h4L1L 9 II-2-h 0-1Q-Pt CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT AUGUST, 1996 1. PEBBLE CREEK PARK DEVELOPMENT Project Number: PK9504 Budget: $200,000 Contract Amount: $194,169 Project Manager: Eric Pioegpr Project Design: PARD Planning Comments/Status: Initial meetings with CSISD staff have occurred to prioritize needed facilities. Public hearings were held October 10 and November 12, 1995. The preliminary site plan was approved by the school board on November 20, 1995. The plan was presented to the City Council on December 13, 1995. Competitive bids for the park's construction were opened April 15, 1996, The project was awarded to Marek Brothers of College Station, Construction started the week of May 13, 1996. Task: Project Design: January- February 1996 Advertisement&Award: March -April 1996 Complete: September 1996 2. LINCOLN CENTER/WAYNE SMITH BASEBALL COMPLEX Project Number: PK9505 Budget: $1,230,000 - 1995 Bond Contract Amount: Design $84,490 Project Manager: Eric Ploeger Project Design: HSI Consulting Architects Comments/Status: After review of 16 proposals by Architectural firms, the staff recommended HSI Architects of Bryan to the City Council, The City Council approved this selection. The contract was signed in early February and the initial meeting with staff took place on February 27. The project has moved to the final design phase with cost estimates expected in early September. Task: Project Design: February-September 1996 Advertisement&Award: September-October 1996 Complete: August 1997 CIP Report 9/5/96 Page 1 of 1 i vvri PPv. NOTICE OF MEETING OF THE (///------ PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD of the City of College Station Notice is hereby given that a (Regular) (Special) ( REGULAR ) meeting of the PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD of the City of'College Station, State of Texas, will be held on the / I. day of SEPTEMBER , 1996,at7:00 i, .M.)(P.m.)i ai 11Q1. SOUTH TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842 _____ The following subjects will be discussed, to-wit: SEE AGENDA Dated this the 5th day of SEPTEMBER ,. 1996. CI, OF COLLEGE STATIO i A : ,/1 „,,, i---,ii 1-74---e CONNIE HOOKS, CITY SECRETARY I, the undersigned authority, do hereby certify that the above Notice of Meeting of the regular meeting of the Parks and Recreation Board of the City of College Station, Texas, is a true and correct copy of said Notice and that I posted a true and correct copy of said Notice on the bulletin board in the City Hall of said College Station, Texas, a place convenient and readily accessible to the general public at all times, and said Notice was posted on SEPTEMBER 5 , 1996, at 5:00 o'clock gAv1s)(13.M.). Dated this the W-M\clav of ___. 3 0 (1i2...., , 1996. .... ....- /-P Cl / . OF COLLEGE STATION Tr A 5 i .., l 4/ /I • 40 ''' i 1 By--. '-. ' CONNIE HOOKS, CITY SECRETARY --- SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS 1)1 THE 1---1DAY OF 1 tO 111 i ' , 1996. 04,4.„ 1 1 \ i YVONNE S. CASARES . 0 4 ta 1 :- '.. * Notary Public,State of Texas 'f NO i'11'Y PUBLIC-BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS 0,. .. ''. ; My CA.9.rnis.ppn_.t)lires i -4.:f 0 1:,). P'UL1Ubl 0 19W6 . ) :tidal My commission expires: I .-- *--9 5 i.....a: • City of College Station Parks and Recreation Board Regular Meeting September 12, 1996 -- 7:00 p.m. • City Hall - Training Room 1101 Texas Avenue South AGENDA 1. Appointment of Advisory Committee Members a. Lincoln Center Advisory Committee b. Conference Center Advisory Committee 2. Adjourn