Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/10/2017 - Regular Agenda Packet - Design Review Board AGENDA DESIGN REVIEW BOARD November 10, 2017 11:00 AM Administrative Conference Room 1101 Texas Avenue College Station City Hall College Station, Texas, 77840 The City Council may or may not attend the Design Review Board meeting. 1. Call to Order. 2. Consideration, discussion and possible action to approve absent requests.  November 10, 2017 – Valerian Miranda 3. Consideration, discussion and possible action to approve meeting minutes.  September 8, 2017 4. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a waiver to the Unified Development Ordinance Section 7.7 Buffer Requirements as it applies to the northwestern property boundary of the property located at 3020 Barron Road, generally located at the southwest corner of the intersection of William D. Fitch Parkway and Barron Road. Case #AWV2017- 000036 (L. Hovde) 5. Possible action and discussion on future agenda items – A Design Review Board Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 6. Adjourn. Design Review Board June 23, 2017 Page 2 of 3 APPROVED: By________________________________ City Manager I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted at College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on 2017 at p.m. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS By_________________________________ City Secretary This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters, readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations. Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder With an Openly Carried Handgun. “Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (trespass by license holder with an openly carried handgun), a person licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (handgun licensing law), may not enter this property with a handgun that is carried openly” Codigo Penal §30.07. Trespasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia. “Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre” Absence Request Form For Elected and Appointed Officers Name Valerian Miranda Request Submitted on October 27, 2017 I will not be in attendance at the meeting of November 10, 2017 for the reason(s) specified: (Date) Out of town. DGR-Via email Page 1 of 2 Minutes Design Review Board September 8, 2017 11:00 AM Administrative Conference Room 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas, 77840 Board Members Present: Chairman Jane Kee, Mary Edwards, William McKinney, Susan McGrail, Valerian Miranda, Troy Smith, Elizabeth Natsios Staff Present: Planning Administrator Justin Golbabai, Staff Planner Madison Thomas, Staff Assistant Deborah Grace-Rosier AGENDA ITEM NO. 1: Call to order. Chairperson Kee called the meeting to order at 11:00 a.m. AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Consideration, discussion and possible action to approve absence requests.  June 23, 2017 – Troy Smith  June 23, 2017 – Valerian Miranda  June 23, 2017 – Elizabeth Natsios Board member McKinney motioned to approve all absence requests. Board member Edwards seconded the motion, which passed unopposed (7-0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Consideration, discussion and possible action to approve meeting minutes.  June 23, 2017 Board member McKinney motioned to approve the meeting minutes. Board member Edwards seconded the motion, which passed unopposed (7-0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Presentation, possible action, and discussion to consider proposed signage in the Wolf Pen Creek District generally located at 2400 Earl Rudder Freeway South. # WPC2017-000001 Staff Planner Thomas gave the Board an overview of the Wolf Pen Creek Overlay District and presented the staff report. She told the Board that the applicant is proposing to replace the freestanding sign for Grand Station Entertainment. The proposed sign will be placed in the same general location of the existing sign and the setback from the right of-way is approximately 120 feet. The sign will be approximately 25.6 feet tall with natural stone foundation and a tan monument to hold the signage. She ended her staff report by saying the Page 2 of 2 proposal meets all other required sign regulations per the Unified Development Ordinance sign section and the structural requirements of the building code. Property owner Mike Logan and Mike Haggerty with Wakefield Signs were in attendance to answer any questions of the Board. There was general discussion amongst the Board. Board member McKinney motioned to approve the request as presented. Board Member Natsios seconded the motion, which passed (6-1). Board member McGrail voting against the motion to approve. AGENDA ITEM NO. 5: Possible action and discussion on future agenda items – A Design Review Board Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to p lace the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. There were no items presented. AGEND ITEM NO. 6: Adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 11:27. APPROVED: _________________________________ Jane Kee, Chairperson ATTEST: ____________________________ Deborah Grace-Rosier, Staff Assistant CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home of Texas A?rM University~ DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION APPEALS &WAIVERS -GENERAL MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ~$380 Design Review Board Application Fee. ~1 Application completed in full.This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered.Please attach pages if additional information is provided. ~Ten (10)samples of the proposed color (if applicable). ~Additional materials may be required of the applicant such as material samples,elevations,site plans,and landscaping plans.The applicant shall be informed of any extra materials required. Date of Optional Preapplication Conference N/A NAME OF PROJECT Cityview Southwest Phase I ADDRESS 191150-000I-00I0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot,Block,Subdivision)Lot 1,Block I Cityview Southwest Subdivision APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER’S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name Upper Deck Development -Kyle Shirley E-mail kyle©upperdeckdevelopment.com Street Address 12633 State Highway 30 City College Station State Texas Zip Code 77845 Phone Number 979.776.9105 Fax Number 979.820.3900 PROPERTY OWNER’S INFORMATION: Name Cityview Investments,LLC E-mail pwmurphy@upperdeckdevelopment.com Street Address 12633 State Highway 30 City College Station State Texas Zip Code 77845 Phone Number 979.776.9105 Fax Number ______________________________ Current zoning Suburban Commercial APPEAL/WAIVER REQU ESTED (circle one): ~Buffer Requirements ~Driveways El WPC Parking El Krenek Tap Corridor Overlay District LI Site Plan Review Criteria El Other _______________________________________ Applicable ordinance section being appealed/seeking waiver from: UDO Sec 12-7.7.-Buffer Requirements Explanation of appeal/waiver request: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.. DATE SUBMITTED: TIME: STAFF: We request the buffer requirements be waived for the property along the Southern Trace Subdivision Common Area that ~buts Jeanne Drive. 10/10 Page 1 of2 GENERAL APPEALS/WAIVER REQUEST 1.The following specific alternative to/waiver from the ordinance is requested: We request the buffer requirements for suburban commercial adjacent to single family residential land use be ~reduced to standard streetscaping requirements along the adjacent Southern Trace Subdivision Common Area. 2.The unnecessary hardship(s)involved by meeting the provisions of the ordinance other than financial hardship is/are: 3.The following alternatives to the requested appeal/waiver are possible: IN ADDITION,FOR ALTERNATIVE MATERIALS IN THE KRENEK TAP OVERLAY DISTRICT,ANSWER THE FOLLOWING AS APPLICABLE (see the Unified Development Ordinance Section 5.8 Overlay Districts for more information): 1.For existing buildings,describe existing facade materials. 2.For new construction,describe how this material(s)meet or exceeds the material standards for the KTO. Date Print Form The unnecessary hardship is that the adjacent common area is undevelopable and unbuildable and the suburban commercial site would be buffering a green space.the nearest single family residences are across Jeanne Drive from the suburban commercial site.If the suburban commercial property directly abutted Jeanne Drive there would e no buffer requirements. We request that the landscape requirements be reduced to the equivalent streetscaping requirements instead of the ~uffering requirements. N/A V/A The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct,and complete. Signature 10/10 Page 2of2 Design Review Board November 10, 2017 Page 1 of 3  DESIGN REVIEW BOARD for Cityview Southwest AWV2017-000036 REQUEST: Waiver to Appendix A, Section 7.7 Buffer Requirements as it applies to the property’s northwestern property boundary. LOCATION: Generally located at the southwest intersection of William D. Fitch Parkway and Barron Road ZONING DISTRICT: SC Suburban Commercial APPLICANT: Schultz Engineering, LLC  PROJECT MANAGER: Lauren Hovde, AICP Senior Planner lhovde@cstx.gov STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the waiver request with the proposed alternative. Design Review Board November 10, 2017 Page 2 of 3  Design Review Board November 10, 2017 Page 3 of 3  DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITY: The Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Appendix A Section 2.5.A states that the Design Review Board is established to enhance “the City's ability to review sign, building, and site design issues, including architectural issues as specified in this UDO, by bringing expertise from the community to bear on these issues in designated design districts.” As part of this purpose, UDO Appendix A, Section 7.7.H Appeals grants the Design Review Board with the power and duty to authorize a waiver to the Section 7.7 Buffer Requirement when: “such standards or variance will not be contrary to the public interest where, owing to unique and special conditions not normally found in like areas, a strict enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance by the Administrator would result in unnecessary hardship, and so that the spirit of this Section shall be observed and substantial justice done.” Based on this section, the Design Review Board can act upon the proposed request in one of the following ways: 1) Approve the request as proposed 2) Approve the request with conditions 3) Deny the request ITEM SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting a waiver to Buffer Requirements due to the property’s unique physical characteristics. On its northwestern boundary, the subject property abuts a 10-foot wide residential common area zoned R Rural that separates the property from the public right-of-way of Jeanne Drive. Due to this abutment to a property zoned for single-family purpose, the subject property is required to install a buffer that consists of 20-foot buffer yard and a fence. In addition, the SC Suburban Commercial zoning district requires the subject property to double the buffer planting from those found in other commercial districts and install a wall between any parking area and the impacted property line. If the property had abutted the Right-of-Way rather than this common area, the buffer requirements would not have applied. Cityview Southwest has received approval on a Site Plan and a Landscape Plan that does not contain a waiver to the buffer standards on its northwestern boundary. However, the applicant’s request is for the Design Review Board to consider waiving the Buffer Requirements on the northwester boundary in lieu of allowing the development to meet streetscape requirements found in Section 7.6 Landscaping and Tree Protection so it may revise these plans. A proposed Landscape Plan showing how such standards would apply is included with this report. DESIGN CRITERIA REQUEST OPTIONS:  Approve as requested  Approve with conditions  Deny SUPPORTING MATERIALS: 1. Application 2. Aerial 3. Landscape Plan with required buffer 4. Landscape Plan with showing streetscape alternative WILLIAM D. FITCH PARKWAY STATE HIGHWAY 40 BARRON ROADJEANNE DRIVEBLOCK 1 BLOCK 1 LOT 1R 0.28 AC. LOT 2 0.22 AC. LOT 3 0.22AC. LOT 4 0.22 AC.LOT 5 0.22 AC. LOT 6 0.22 AC. LOT 7 0.22 AC.LOT 8 0.22 AC. LOT 9 0.22 AC. LOT 10 0.32 AC. LOT 11 0.38 AC. LOT 12 0.34 AC. LOT 13 0.25 AC.LOT 14 0.37 AC. LOT 15 0.28 AC. LOT 16 0.29 AC. LOT 17 0.35 AC. COMMON AREA 1 3.32 AC. COMMON AREA 1 3.32 AC. FF = 348.00'FF = 349.00'FF = 350.50'FF = 352.50' FF = 348.00'FF = 349.50'FF = 351.50'FF = 356.00'FF = 360.50'FF = 362.00'FF = 364.50' FF = 366.50'FF = 364.50'FF = 363.00'FF = 360.50 FF = 347.50'FF = 354.50' WILLIAM D. FITCH PARKWAY STATE HIGHWAY 40 BARRON ROADJEANNE DRIVEBLOCK 1 BLOCK 1 LOT 1R 0.28 AC. LOT 2 0.22 AC. LOT 3 0.22AC. LOT 4 0.22 AC.LOT 5 0.22 AC. LOT 6 0.22 AC. LOT 7 0.22 AC.LOT 8 0.22 AC. LOT 9 0.22 AC. LOT 10 0.32 AC. LOT 11 0.38 AC. LOT 12 0.34 AC. LOT 13 0.25 AC.LOT 14 0.37 AC. LOT 15 0.28 AC. LOT 16 0.29 AC. LOT 17 0.35 AC. COMMON AREA 1 3.32 AC. COMMON AREA 1 3.32 AC. FF = 348.00'FF = 349.00'FF = 350.50'FF = 352.50' FF = 348.00'FF = 349.50'FF = 351.50'FF = 356.00'FF = 360.50'FF = 362.00'FF = 364.50' FF = 366.50'FF = 364.50'FF = 363.00'FF = 360.50 FF = 347.50'FF = 354.50' SCALE PLOTTING SCALE: VERTICAL HORIZONTAL SURVEYED DLD DESIGNED DLD DRAWN APPROVED JPS JOB NO.DATE 1:1 16-44516-445 CITYVIEW SOUTHWEST PHASE 1 CITYVIEW SOUTHWEST LOT 1 BLOCK 1 - COLLEGE STATION, TX SEPTEMBER 2017 SHEET FILE NAME:KERR 911 Southwest Pkwy E. College Station, Texas 77840 979.764.3900 TBPE FIRM NO. 12327 1"=40' N/A LANDSCAPE PLAN L1 LANDSCAPE POINTS SYMBOL SIZE NAME & TYPE QUANTITY POINT VALUE TOTAL POINTS 3.5" > CAL LIVE OAK (QUERCUS VIRGINIANA) CANOPY 33 300 9900 1.25" CAL PER CANE CREPE MYRTLE (LAGERSTOEMIA INDICA) NON-CANOPY RED ROCKET OR SIMILAR COLOR 69 40 2760 5 GAL. SEA GREEN JUNIPERS(JUNIPERUS x PFITZERIANA 'SEA GREEN') 41 10 410 STREETSCAPE POINTS 2.1" - 3.4" CAL LIVE OAK (QUERCUS VIRGINIANA) CANOPY 12 150 1800 1.25" CAL PER CANE CREPE MYRTLE (LAGERSTOEMIA INDICA) NON-CANOPY 70 40 2800 TOTAL POINTS:17670 CANOPY TREE POINTS:11700 % POINTS FROM CANOPY TREES:66.21% LANDSCAPE POINT CALCULATIONS PROJECT AREA POINTS PROJECT AREA (SF)1000 SF OF PROJECT AREA 30 POINTS PER 1000 SF TOTAL PROJECT AREA POINTS 344,448 344.4 30 10,333 ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE POINTS FROM STREETSCAPE STREETSCAPE LENGTH (FT) LENGTH OF FRONTAGE - DRIVEWAY WIDTH POINTS PER STREETSPACE SEGMENT LENGTH TOTAL ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE POINTS 1221 6 7,326 TOTAL POINTS REQUIRED:17,659 TOTAL POINTS PROVIDED:17,670 WILLIAM D. FITCH PARKWAY STREETSCAPE STREETSCAPE LENGTH (FT) LENGTH OF FRONTAGE - DRIVEWAY WIDTH CANOPY TREES REQUIRED FOR STREETSCAPE (1 PER 25')CANOPY TREES PROVIDED NON-CANOPY TREES PROVIDED (* 2 NON-CANOPY TREES COUNT AS 1 CANOPY TREE) 861 35 8 54 BARRON ROAD STREETSCAPE STREETSCAPE LENGTH (FT) LENGTH OF FRONTAGE - DRIVEWAY WIDTH CANOPY TREES REQUIRED FOR STREETSCAPE (1 PER *32')CANOPY TREES PROVIDED NON-CANOPY TREES PROVIDED (* 2 NON-CANOPY TREES COUNT AS 1 CANOPY TREE) 360 12 4 16 LANDSCAPE BUFFER POINTS SYMBOL SIZE NAME & TYPE QUANTITY 3.5" > CAL LIVE OAK (QUERCUS VIRGINIANA) CANOPY 109 1.25" CAL PER CANE CREPE MYRTLE (LAGERSTOEMIA INDICA) NON-CANOPY RED ROCKET OR SIMILAR COLOR 91 5 GAL. SEA GREEN JUNIPERS(JUNIPERUS x PFITZERIANA 'SEA GREEN') 442 THIS LANDSCAPE PLAN IS FOR PERMITTING ONLY AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION WILLIAM D. FITCH PARKWAY STATE HIGHWAY 40 BARRON ROADJEANNE DRIVEBLOCK 1 BLOCK 1 LOT 1R 0.28 AC. LOT 2 0.22 AC. LOT 3 0.22AC. LOT 4 0.22 AC.LOT 5 0.22 AC. LOT 6 0.22 AC. LOT 7 0.22 AC.LOT 8 0.22 AC. LOT 9 0.22 AC. LOT 10 0.32 AC. LOT 11 0.38 AC. LOT 12 0.34 AC. LOT 13 0.25 AC.LOT 14 0.37 AC. LOT 15 0.28 AC. LOT 16 0.29 AC. LOT 17 0.35 AC. COMMON AREA 1 3.32 AC. COMMON AREA 1 3.32 AC. FF = 348.00'FF = 349.00'FF = 350.50'FF = 352.50' FF = 348.00'FF = 349.50'FF = 351.50'FF = 356.00'FF = 360.50'FF = 362.00'FF = 364.50' FF = 366.50'FF = 364.50'FF = 363.00'FF = 360.50 FF = 347.50'FF = 354.50' WILLIAM D. FITCH PARKWAY STATE HIGHWAY 40 BARRON ROADJEANNE DRIVEBLOCK 1 BLOCK 1 LOT 1R 0.28 AC. LOT 2 0.22 AC. LOT 3 0.22AC. LOT 4 0.22 AC.LOT 5 0.22 AC. LOT 6 0.22 AC. LOT 7 0.22 AC.LOT 8 0.22 AC. LOT 9 0.22 AC. LOT 10 0.32 AC. LOT 11 0.38 AC. LOT 12 0.34 AC. LOT 13 0.25 AC.LOT 14 0.37 AC. LOT 15 0.28 AC. LOT 16 0.29 AC. LOT 17 0.35 AC. COMMON AREA 1 3.32 AC. COMMON AREA 1 3.32 AC. FF = 348.00'FF = 349.00'FF = 350.50'FF = 352.50' FF = 348.00'FF = 349.50'FF = 351.50'FF = 356.00'FF = 360.50'FF = 362.00'FF = 364.50' FF = 366.50'FF = 364.50'FF = 363.00'FF = 360.50 FF = 347.50'FF = 354.50' SCALE PLOTTING SCALE: VERTICAL HORIZONTAL SURVEYED DLD DESIGNED DLD DRAWN APPROVED JPS JOB NO.DATE 1:1 16-44516-445 CITYVIEW SOUTHWEST PHASE 1 CITYVIEW SOUTHWEST LOT 1 BLOCK 1 - COLLEGE STATION, TX SEPTEMBER 2017 SHEET FILE NAME:KERR 911 Southwest Pkwy E. College Station, Texas 77840 979.764.3900 TBPE FIRM NO. 12327 1"=40' N/AALTERNATIVE LANDSCAPE PLAN L1 LANDSCAPE POINTS SYMBOL SIZE NAME & TYPE QUANTITY POINT VALUE TOTAL POINTS 3.5" > CAL LIVE OAK (QUERCUS VIRGINIANA) CANOPY 33 300 9900 1.25" CAL PER CANE CREPE MYRTLE (LAGERSTOEMIA INDICA) NON-CANOPY RED ROCKET OR SIMILAR COLOR 69 40 2760 5 GAL. SEA GREEN JUNIPERS(JUNIPERUS x PFITZERIANA 'SEA GREEN') 41 10 410 STREETSCAPE POINTS 2.1" - 3.4" CAL LIVE OAK (QUERCUS VIRGINIANA) CANOPY 26 150 3900 1.25" CAL PER CANE CREPE MYRTLE (LAGERSTOEMIA INDICA) NON-CANOPY 70 40 2800 TOTAL POINTS:19770 CANOPY TREE POINTS:13800 % POINTS FROM CANOPY TREES:69.80% LANDSCAPE POINT CALCULATIONS PROJECT AREA POINTS PROJECT AREA (SF)1000 SF OF PROJECT AREA 30 POINTS PER 1000 SF TOTAL PROJECT AREA POINTS 344,448 344.4 30 10,333 ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE POINTS FROM STREETSCAPE STREETSCAPE LENGTH (FT) LENGTH OF FRONTAGE - DRIVEWAY WIDTH POINTS PER STREETSPACE SEGMENT LENGTH TOTAL ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE POINTS 1221 6 7,326 TOTAL POINTS REQUIRED:17,659 TOTAL POINTS PROVIDED:19,770 WILLIAM D. FITCH PARKWAY STREETSCAPE STREETSCAPE LENGTH (FT) LENGTH OF FRONTAGE - DRIVEWAY WIDTH CANOPY TREES REQUIRED FOR STREETSCAPE (1 PER 25')CANOPY TREES PROVIDED NON-CANOPY TREES PROVIDED (* 2 NON-CANOPY TREES COUNT AS 1 CANOPY TREE) 861 35 8 54 BARRON ROAD STREETSCAPE STREETSCAPE LENGTH (FT) LENGTH OF FRONTAGE - DRIVEWAY WIDTH CANOPY TREES REQUIRED FOR STREETSCAPE (1 PER *32')CANOPY TREES PROVIDED NON-CANOPY TREES PROVIDED (* 2 NON-CANOPY TREES COUNT AS 1 CANOPY TREE) 360 12 4 16 JEANNE DRIVE STREETSCAPE STREETSCAPE LENGTH (FT) LENGTH OF FRONTAGE - DRIVEWAY WIDTH CANOPY TREES REQUIRED FOR STREETSCAPE (1 PER *32')CANOPY TREES PROVIDED NON-CANOPY TREES PROVIDED (* 2 NON-CANOPY TREES COUNT AS 1 CANOPY TREE) 438 14 14 0 LANDSCAPE BUFFER POINTS SYMBOL SIZE NAME & TYPE QUANTITY 3.5" > CAL LIVE OAK (QUERCUS VIRGINIANA) CANOPY 109 1.25" CAL PER CANE CREPE MYRTLE (LAGERSTOEMIA INDICA) NON-CANOPY RED ROCKET OR SIMILAR COLOR 91 5 GAL. SEA GREEN JUNIPERS(JUNIPERUS x PFITZERIANA 'SEA GREEN') 442 THIS LANDSCAPE PLAN IS FOR PERMITTING ONLY AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION