Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFY 2011-2012 -- Approved Annual BudgetCity of College Station, Texas Approved Budget for Fiscal Year 2012 October 1, 2011 to September 30, 2012 Principal City Officials, October 2011 Elected Officials Mayor ....................................................................................................................................................................... Nancy Berry City Council Place 1 ................................................................................................................................................ Blanche Brick City Council Place 2 ..................................................................................................................................................... Jess Fields City Council Place 3 ................................................................................................................................................. Karl Mooney City Council Place 4 ........................................................................................................................................... Katy-Marie Lyles City Council Place 5 .................................................................................................................................................. Julie Schultz City Council Place 6/Mayor Pro Tem...................................................................................................................... Dave Ruesink City Administration City Manager .......................................................................................................................................................... David Neeley Deputy City Manager ............................................................................................................................................. Kathy Merrill Deputy City Manager ........................................................................................................................................... Frank Simpson Executive Director, Business Services ...................................................................................................................... Jeff Kersten Executive Director, Planning and Development Services .................................................................................... Bob Cowell, Jr. Director of Public Communications .............................................................................................................................. Jay Socol Director of Water Services Department ............................................................................................................. David Coleman Director of Electric Utility ...................................................................................................................................... David Massey Chief of Police ........................................................................................................................................................ Jeffrey Capps Fire Chief ............................................................................................................................................................. Robert B. Alley Director of Public Works ..................................................................................................................................... Charles Gilman Director of Parks and Recreation .......................................................................................................................... David Schmitz Director of Information Technology .......................................................................................................................... Ben Roper Director of Human Resources .................................................................................................................................. Alison Pond City Attorney ....................................................................................................................................................... Carla Robinson City Secretary .................................................................................................................................................. Sherry Mashburn Internal Auditor ............................................................................................................................................................. Ty Elliott The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) presented a Distinguished Budget Presentation Award to City of College Station, Texas for its annual budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2010. In order to receive this award, a government unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, as an operations guide, as a financial plan, and as a communication device. This award is valid for a period of one year only. We believe our current budget continues to conform to program requirements, and we are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility for another award. Information as of February, 2011 Source: http://www.cstx.gov/index.aspx?page=2011 Community Profile City of College Station – Home of Texas A&M University Global Crossroads in the Heart of Texas Nothing defines a city better than its people. In College Station you will find some of the friendliest and most patriotic people in the nation. It is home to Texas A&M University, one of the largest research institutions and public universities in the nation. Texas A&M has also developed many military leaders over the years who have lead our nation in times of war. It is a Big XII Conference school, which makes college sports such as football, baseball, and basketball and many others highlights of the community. College Station is the largest city in the metropolitan area, with a population of 96,666 in 2011. Due to the international influence of Texas A&M, there is a healthy diversity of race, culture and nationality to College Station that reflects much of the vibrancy, tradition and spirit that make it a special place. College Station is in the "heart" of central Texas. Only 100 miles from Houston and Austin and 160 miles from Dallas and San Antonio, College Station is within three hours driving time of most major cities. A network of well-maintained highways and a nearby regional airport serviced by major airlines facilitates quick transportation between College Station and the rest of the country. Information as of February, 2011 Source: http://www.cstx.gov/index.aspx?page=2011 Quality Resources for Quality Living Education is a major focus of the College Station community. College Station Independent School District has received many state and national awards and has been honored with numerous National Merit Finalists, National Merit Semi-Finalists, National Hispanic Recognition Program Finalists, and other State and National champions and finalists. The George Bush Presidential Library and Museum is one of the region's most popular tourist attractions with approximately 700,000 visitors annually. Former President George H. W. Bush and Barbara are often seen on campus or around town as they make College Station their second home. College Station is also one of the safest and most family-friendly places to live in all of Texas. The city consistently maintains one of the lowest crime rates in the state, giving peace of mind and a sense of security to residents and business owners. The Wisdom of Simple Pleasures Nature is an integral part of life in College Station, with over 1300 acres of beautifully maintained public parks and sports facilities enhancing the city. Recreational activities are plentiful, with numerous golf courses, lush nature trails, challenging bike paths and sports leagues of every kind, including national, state and local tournaments. A Bright Business Future College Station...where business meets knowledge. Business and technology companies are maximizing their relationships with Texas A&M University, home to the nation's largest engineering school and some of the smartest students in the United States. Companies are taking advantage of this asset, finding energetic, quality employees among annual college graduates, and the city's economic future is as bright as the sky over Texas. George Bush Presidential Library and Museum on the campus of Texas A&M University Wolf Pen Creek Park & Amphitheater Information as of February, 2011 Source: http://www.cstx.gov/index.aspx?page=2011 Brief College Station History The City of College Station is a young municipality, with its beginnings in the founding of Texas A&M College. Texas' first state institution of higher education, the College was inaugurated in 1876. Because of the school's isolation, school administrators provided facilities for those who were associated with the college. The campus became the focal point of community development. The area was designated "College Station, Texas" by the Postal Service in 1877. The name was derived from the train station located to the west of the campus. Growth of both the community and college influenced residents' desire to create a municipal government. The City of College Station was incorporated in 1938. The incorporation was a result of a petition, by 23 men representing on and off campus interests, to the Board of Directors of Texas A&M College. The Board of Directors had no objection to the annexation, and suggested that a belt around the campus be included in the proposed city. Citizens voted 217 to 39 on October 19, 1938 to incorporate the City of College Station. The first City Council meeting was held on February 25, 1939 in the Administration Building on the A&M campus. The Council became interested in adopting a governmental structure similar to the council-manager form of government. At the time of incorporation, state law did not allow a general law city to hire a city manager. As a result, College Station employed a business manager until 1943 when state law was changed to permit general law cities to make use of the council-manager form of government. College Station became the first general law city in the State of Texas to employ a city manager. In 1952, once College Station's population exceeded 5,000, College Station voters approved a home rule charter that provided for the council-manager form of government. The first College Station City Council, 1938-1939 TABLE OF CONTENTS  Coversheet - Statement Required by Texas House Bill 3195 ........................................................ i Transmittal Letter .......................................................................................................................... iii Executive Summary Executive Summary ................................................................................................................1 Budget Overview ..................................................................................................................14 Fiscal Year Comparison Summary .......................................................................................34 Graph of Net Budget .............................................................................................................35 Combined Summary of Revenue & Expenditures ................................................................36 All Funds Operations & Maintenance Summary ..................................................................38 Analysis of Tax Rate .............................................................................................................39 Analysis of Property Valuations ...........................................................................................40 City Organization Chart ........................................................................................................41 Strategic Planning and Budget Process.................................................................................42 Governmental Funds General Fund .......................................................................................................................43 Police Department .....................................................................................................48 Fire Department ........................................................................................................56 Public Works .............................................................................................................63 Parks and Recreation.................................................................................................70 Library.......................................................................................................................77 Planning and Development Services ........................................................................80 Information Technology ...........................................................................................90 Fiscal Services ..........................................................................................................93 General Government ...............................................................................................100 Debt Service Fund...............................................................................................................104 Economic Development Fund .............................................................................................109 TABLE OF CONTENTS  Efficiency Time Payment Fund ..........................................................................................111 Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency (BVSWMA) Fund ...............................112 Governmental Capital Improvement Projects .....................................................................115 Street Fund ..............................................................................................................120 Parks and Recreation Projects Fund .......................................................................124 Facilities & Technology Fund ................................................................................126 Business Park Fund .................................................................................................128 Chimney Hill Fund .................................................................................................130 Estimated Operations and Maintenance Costs ........................................................132 Enterprise Funds Combined Utility Funds ......................................................................................................133 Electric Utility .....................................................................................................................136 Water Services Department ................................................................................................141 Water .....................................................................................................................142 Wastewater ..............................................................................................................146 Sanitation ............................................................................................................................150 Northgate Parking Enterprise Fund ....................................................................................154 Utility Capital Improvement Projects .................................................................................159 Electric ....................................................................................................................164 Water .......................................................................................................................166 Wastewater ..............................................................................................................170 Estimated Operations and Maintenance Costs ........................................................174 Special Revenue Services Hotel Tax Fund ...................................................................................................................175 Community Development Fund ..........................................................................................177 TABLE OF CONTENTS  Recreation Fund ..................................................................................................................182 American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) Fund .....................................189 Traffic Safety Fund .............................................................................................................191 Wolf Pen Creek TIF ............................................................................................................193 Municipal Court Fee Funds ................................................................................................194 Court Technology Fee Fund ...................................................................................195 Court Security Fee Fund .........................................................................................196 Juvenile Case Manager Fee Fund ...........................................................................198 Police Seizure Fund ............................................................................................................200 Memorial Cemetery Fund ...................................................................................................201 Memorial Cemetery Perpetual Care Fund ..........................................................................202 Cemetery Perpetual Care Fund ...........................................................................................203 Special Revenue Capital Improvement Projects .................................................................204 Parkland Dedication ................................................................................................206 Drainage Fund .........................................................................................................208 Estimated Operations and Maintenance Costs ........................................................210 Internal Service Funds Insurance Funds ..................................................................................................................211 Property Casualty Fund...........................................................................................212 Employee Benefits Fund .........................................................................................214 Workers Compensation Fund .................................................................................216 Unemployment Compensation Fund ......................................................................218 Equipment Replacement Fund ............................................................................................219 Utility Customer Service.....................................................................................................223 Fleet Maintenance Fund ......................................................................................................227 TABLE OF CONTENTS  Appendices Budget Ordinances ............................................................................................................. A-1 Service Level Adjustments List ..........................................................................................B-1 Personnel .............................................................................................................................C-1 Revenue History and Budget Estimates ............................................................................. D-1 Budget Provision Stated in Charter..................................................................................... E-1 Fiscal and Budgetary Policy Statements ............................................................................. F-1 Miscellaneous Statistical Data ........................................................................................... G-1 Debt Service Schedules...................................................................................................... H-1 General and Administrative Transfers ................................................................................. I-1 Outside Agency Funding ..................................................................................................... J-1 Glossary ............................................................................................................................. K-1 Cover Page City of College Station Statement Required by Texas House Bill 3195 This budget will raise more total property taxes than last year's budget by $738,343, or 3%, and of that amount $646,832 is tax revenue to be raised from new property added to the tax roll this year. i ii October 1, 2011 Honorable Mayor and City Council: I am pleased to present the Approved Annual Budget for Fiscal Year 2011 – 2012 for the City of College Station. The approved budget totals $246,554,877 for all funds. Of this amount $209,205,084 is for the operations and maintenance budget, and $37,349,793 is for the capital budget. This budget results in a 5.62 percent increase from the FY11 approved budget. The majority of this increase is for Utility Capital projects. These projects include major infrastructure improvements in the Electric, Water, and Wastewater capital funds. This budget was put together using policy parameters provided by the City Council through the Strategic Plan, the Fiscal and Budgetary Policies, and other policy direction provided by the City Council. The 2011 – 2012 Approved Annual Budget is about planning for the future of College Station. The following key budget policy points have driven the preparation of this budget.  Economic uncertainty  Organization restructuring  Utility transfer policy  Tax rate  Utility rates  Public safety  Pay and benefits The following are the City Council strategic initiatives that provided direction in budget preparation. As the budget was prepared, resources were allocated to address these initiatives.  Financially Sustainable City  Core Services and Infrastructure  Neighborhood Integrity  Diverse Growing Economy  Improved Mobility  Sustainable City Preparation of this year’s budget has been especially challenging. The economic conditions that the City has faced over the last several years have resulted in slower revenue growth, which has impacted the long term financial condition of the City. Adding to this challenge is the uncertainty in State funding for education at all levels in Texas; increasing demands for services in a growing community, including the operating costs for Fire Station #6; and policy changes to reduce the Return on Investment transfer from the Electric Fund to the General Fund. Economic Conditions Impact Budget Preparation The past year continued to be a difficult one for the economy at all levels, including locally. This year the State Legislature ultimately passed a budget that reduced funding for education at all levels in the State. It is still not known what the ultimate impact of these reductions will be to the local economy, but higher education jobs are the primary driver of the local job market. The uncertainty in the economy results in lower spending levels, which impacts key revenue streams such as sales tax. iii Reorganization Plan and Budget Reductions After completing a thorough assessment of the City’s organizational structure, taking into consideration the fiscal condition, as well as the 2012 budget proposals from the departments, the City Manager’s Office implemented a reorganization plan. The reorganization has an impact on several departments that will result in considerable recurring cost saving to the City, and significantly improve efficiency by refocusing resources on core services. These reductions include the reorganization of the Department of Economic and Community Development by eliminating the Economic Development Division. This was accomplished by moving the economic development responsibilities to the City Manager’s Office (CMO), and shifting some of the remaining resources to the CMO. The Community Development and Northgate divisions previously in the Economic and Community Development Department were moved to the Planning and Development Services Department. There was also a significant restructuring of the Parks and Recreation Department to better organize the management structure in the department. There were other restructuring and reductions throughout the organization as well. In total, these reductions will save $1,231,885 from the General Fund and $284,489 from other funds. These reductions eliminated 27.25 budgeted Full Time Equivalent positions throughout the organization; 11 of those positions were filled. The decisions that were made in regards to the reductions and eliminations were exceptionally difficult. However, these changes are necessary to meet the City’s current and anticipated fiscal challenges and opportunities; and will refocus the organization’s service levels and delivery more appropriately on core services until some sustained economic recovery is seen. Over the past several years, it has been necessary to reduce the budget due to lower than anticipated revenues. In FY09, the General Fund budget was reduced by a total of $954,175. The FY10 budget was reduced by a total of $3,393,098, and of this amount, $2,193,338 was reduced from the General Fund. The FY11 budget included budget reductions of $1,175,096. The General Fund portion of the FY11 budget reductions is $993,096. The FY12 budget was reduced by $1,624,696, the General Fund portion was $1,333,207. Over the last four years, a total of $7,147,065 has been removed from the City of College Station operations and maintenance budget. This includes the elimination of 43.75 Full Time Equivalent positions in FY11 and FY12. This includes the reorganization reductions outlined earlier in this letter. It also includes the elimination of two Director level positions (Capital Projects Director and Economic and Community Development Director), as well as middle management and entry level positions. During this same timeframe 35 public safety positions have been added to the budget. City staff continues to look for efficiencies in the way services are provided. Utility Transfer Policy Changes The approved budget was prepared with changes to the Return on Investment (ROI) transfer from the Electric Fund to the General Fund. The existing policy caps this transfer at 10.5% of electric operating revenues. The electric portion of this transfer was budgeted at approximately $8.81 million in FY11, and has increased in recent years as revenues in the Electric Fund have increased due to increases in purchased power costs. This new plan changes the Return on Investment transfer from the Electric Utility Fund from a 2 part transfer including an “in lieu of franchise fee” and a “return on investment” to the General Fund, to an “in lieu of franchise fee” capped at 6% of electric revenues. In the future the transfer will be adjusted as electric sales increase based on KWH usage figures. The transfer will be reduced in FY12 by $2.0 million and an additional $1.0 million in FY13, for a total reduction of $3 million over the next two year years. This reduction in transfer is necessary to ensure the long term financial health of the Electric Utility, which has seen rate increases in recent years due to increases in purchased power costs. While a 4% rate increase in the Electric Fund was forecast in FY12, no rate increase is included in the FY12 budget. With the reductions in the ROI transfer, and other approved transfers into the Electric Fund, a rate increase was not recommended in FY12, but is forecasted for FY13. iv The challenging part of this reduction in transfer from the Electric Fund is it becomes necessary to reduce expenditures or increase revenues to make up this loss of revenue in the General Fund. Pay Plan and Benefits The FY12 approved budget also includes appropriations for some modest pay increases for City personnel. While the City has recently undergone an organizational restructuring and reduction in workforce to assist in reducing the overall budget, it is imperative that the City retain the best, most highly qualified and talented staff. Therefore, a 2.5% performance based increase in pay is included in this year’s budget. As the city has implemented several workforce reductions in recent years, we have asked our employees to be more innovative and do more work. During that same time, our employees have also seen an increase to their share of the cost for benefits, such as an 10% increase for health benefits in 2012 and more benefits becoming voluntary. Employees have not received a substantial base pay increase all while coping with rising inflation costs. While there were performance increases on a sliding scale averaging 2.5% for lower paid employees and 1% lump sum increase for mid-level employees in FY11, the actual pay structure (minimums to maximums) has not moved for the past four years. This means that our competition most likely has hiring salaries higher than those at the City and have the ability to pay at a higher rate on the scale. This budget does not recommend moving the scale this year, however, the performance increase this year will help mitigate the current trend and improve employee morale until adjusting the scale can be made a priority in future years. The approved budget also includes funding for the third phase of a step plan in the College Station Police Department. It is anticipated that continuing the implementation of the step pay plan will allow the Police Department to be more competitive in recruiting and retaining officers. Since FY09 through what is included in the FY12 budget, the City of Bryan will have approved a total of 10.0% in merit increases while College Station has provided merit increases on the order of 8.0% within the same time span. Additionally, executive management has not received any increase in base pay since January 2009. It is important to recognize that College Station is not alone in its budget situation, nor is it alone in implementing strategies to retain and attract high performing personnel. According Mercer’s 2011/2012 U.S. Compensation Planning Survey report, 97 percent of U.S. organizations are planning to award base pay increases in 2012. Mercer expects the average increase in base pay for U.S. workers to be 3 percent in 2012, up slightly from 2.9 percent in 2011 and 2.7 percent in 2010. Of the organizations that project higher 2012 pay increases vs. 2011, half of them cited expected labor shortages and greater competition for workers as the main reason. Capital Projects The approved Capital Improvements Budget for FY12 totals $37,349,793 for all funds that include capital projects. This budget amount does not, however, reflect all projected capital expenditures for FY12. The total projected to be spent on capital projects including both new appropriations as well as existing appropriations is approximately $56 million. The approved budget also reflects delaying some capital projects in order to avoid having to take on additional operations and maintenance costs. Increased Service Levels Public Safety - Fire Department – Fire Station #6 Operations and Maintenance The approved Fire Department budget includes $1,853,555 for the addition of 18 positions for the staffing of the new Fire Station #6 (9 were added in FY11 and 9 are included for FY12). The construction of Fire Station #6 was approved in the 2008 bond authorization. The project has been designed and construction v has recently begun. This is a significant increase in cost to get this new Fire Station operational. Also included in the FY12 budget is $80,000 for maintenance and repairs to Fire Station #4. Transportation - Public Works – Street Overlays Funds in the amount of $350,000 are included in the Public Works budget for thoroughfare street overlay projects. Street overlay projects proposed for next fiscal year with these funds include Rock Prairie West, Brothers Blvd, Post Oak Circle, Murifield Village, Jones Butler, and Hardwood. In FY11, $200,000 was included for overlays. It is important to be able to continue to put funds aside for street rehabilitation projects. These funds are from one-time dollars available in the General Fund above the 15% Fund Balance policy. The following are some of the other additions in the approved budget:  $50,000 for a small area plan in the recently annexed Wellborn area.  $25,000 for a structural study of the Conference Center on George Bush Drive.  $18,000 one-time and $25,000 recurring for the replacement of Registration/Reservation software in the Parks and Recreation Department.  $22,200 for new athletic field equipment.  $13,275 for ongoing costs associated with the new codification service in the City Secretary’s Office.  $54,431 for an additional employee in the City Auditor’s Office.  $80,000 for additional security cameras in the Northgate Parking Garage.  $19,000 in Hotel Tax funds for the Texas Pool Council Annual Conference.  $23,661 in the Utility Customer Service Fund for the replacement of Hand Held Meter reading equipment.  $75,000 in the Economic Development Fund for an economic development plan. A full listing of the budget additions can be found Appendix B of this document. Tax Rate The total certified value of property in the City of College Station for 2011 is $5,738,615,002. This is an increase over last year of 5.2%. This increase was due in part to new property values from new construction of $147,680,330 added to the tax rolls. Existing property values increased by approximately 2% in 2011. Based on these final property value numbers received from the Brazos County Appraisal District – the effective tax rate for next year is calculated to be 43.7995 cents. The effective tax rate is the rate that will raise the same revenues on the same properties this year as last year. The FY12 budget was prepared using the effective tax rate of 43.7995 cents per $100 assessed valuation. This is a net decrease of 0.9548 cents from the FY11 tax rate of 44.7543 cents. The tax rate is comprised of two components: the Debt Service component and the General Fund component. The FY12 approved tax rate reduces the Debt Service portion of the tax rate by 1.8658, and increases the General Fund portion of the tax rate by 0.9110 cents. This reallocation of the tax rate will help fund additional Fire Department resources. The resulting tax rate reflects a net decrease of 0.9548 cents. The following chart shows the two components of the tax rate, and the impact of the approved tax rate for FY 2012 as compared to the FY 2011 tax rate. vi Each cent on the tax rate will generate approximately $533,000 in additional property tax revenue. FY 2012 Utilities Electric Fund The approved budget does not include an increase in electric rates, although a 4% rate increase was originally forecast for this year. There have been rate increases over the last 6 years to address increases in purchased power costs, and staff understands the difficulty in having an additional rate increase this year. The rate increase originally forecast for FY12 is now forecast for FY13. This future increase is needed to continue the planned increases in purchased power costs that have been phased in over the last several years. The planned increases in purchased power costs are included in the FY12 approved Electric Utility budget. Wastewater Fund The approved budget includes a 5% increase in wastewater utility rates. This rate increase is needed to fund the projected operating, debt service, and capital costs for the wastewater utility system. The approved budget does not include any rate increases for the Water Fund, Sanitation Fund or Drainage Fund. Conclusion This FY12 Approved Annual Budget is about planning for the future of College Station. While this was a difficult budget to prepare and strides have been made to adjust the way services are provided, it will likely be necessary to make additional budget reductions in future years, especially if revenue growth continues to be slow to modest. These additional budget reductions will require policy decisions about what services the City will provide, how those services will be provided, and how those services will be paid for in the future. These are challenging times, but I am confident that the City will meet these challenges head on, and believe this budget makes the future of College Station a little more secure. In closing, I would like to thank all of the staff who have worked hard to put this proposed budget together. I especially want to thank the budget team who have put many hours into the preparation of this document. Sincerely, David Neeley City Manager Approved FY11 Approved FY12 Debt Service Portion 22.0194 (1.8658) 20.1536  General Fund Portion 22.7349 0.9110 23.6459  44.7543  (0.9548)  43.7995  vii Executive Summary City of College Station Mission Statement  On behalf of the citizens of College Station, home of Texas A&M University, we will continue to promote and advance the community’s quality of life. The following is a summary of key elements included in the Fiscal Year 2011-2012 Approved Budget for the City of College Station. The 2012 fiscal year begins October 1, 2011 and ends September 30, 2012. This budget provides the framework to implement the mission and vision of the City as outlined by City Council. The budget is prepared in the context of the Financial Forecast. The forecast predicts the fiscal impact of current and future budgetary decisions in a five-year forecast based on a set of assumptions regarding revenues and expenditures. The budget also continues the implementation of decisions made by Council. The budget is submitted to Council approximately 45 days prior to the end of the fiscal year. Copies are placed with the City Secretary and in the Larry J. Ringer Library for citizen review. The budget is also available on the City’s internet site at www.cstx.gov. The budget document is presented by fund and is designed to provide decision makers with an overview of City resources and how resources are utilized to accomplish the policy direction of Council. The budget shows the City’s commitments and how the City meets the financial policies approved by Council. The document is also designed to show services provided and associated costs. Below is a summary of the Fiscal Year 2011-2012 Approved Net Budget. FY12 Approved Net Budget Summary Fund Type Approved Net Budget Governmental Funds 69,178,447$        Enterprise Funds 131,186,504        Special Revenue Funds 8,840,133             Subtotal O&M 209,205,084$      3,345,000             Capital Projects 34,004,793          Total Approved Net Budget 246,554,877$      Fund Balance/Working Cap Transfer to CIP   Budget Format  The budget is presented in three sections: the Budget Summary, Fund Sections, and Appendices. Budget Summary Section  The Budget Summary section provides a general overview of the approved budget and identifies key changes from the prior year. This section includes the Transmittal Letter and Executive Summary.    1 Fund Sections  The Fund sections of the budget provide a view of various services provided by the City and are organized around the Governmental, Enterprise, Special Revenue, and Internal Service funds. This part of the budget is designed to show services that are provided and the budget resources available. Performance expectations are shown in the form of service levels and performance measures for each major activity. The service levels show the services that different functions and programs in the organization provide. Performance measures are specific measures that illustrate how well levels of service are being met. Also included in these sections are budget summaries that provide a brief description of the activity, the approved budget, and the number of personnel included in the activity. Fund summaries and department summaries include prior year (FY10) actual revenues and expenditures, revised FY11 budget revenues and expenditures, FY11 year- end estimates, FY12 base departmental requests, and the total FY12 approved budget. Appendices  The final section of the budget is the Appendix, which includes supplemental information to meet specific Charter requirements and provide an overview of the community. The appendices include a detail of positions in the budget, the Fiscal and Budgetary Policies, and other schedules necessary for a comprehensive budget document. Budget Basis  The City organization is composed of various departments or general service areas. Several departments are represented within more than one fund. Each department consists of one or more divisions and each division may have one or more activity (cost) centers. Routine budget controls are exercised within activity centers at the category level (groupings of accounting objects into the categories: salaries and benefits, supplies, maintenance, purchased services, and capital outlay). On an annual basis, fiscal control is at the department level in the General Fund and at the fund level for other funds. Also included in the budget is a summary of the approved Capital Improvement Projects Budget for FY12. This includes the General Government Capital Projects, Utility Capital Projects and Special Revenue Capital Projects. Budgetary Management     The strategic planning and budget processes are integrated to ensure that policy direction is implemented through the budget cycle. The development of the budget begins early in the calendar year with Budget staff preparing salary and benefit information based on Council pay policy for the upcoming budget year. The process continues through the spring and summer as departments prepare budget requests. All salary and benefit amounts for regular full and part-time positions are budgeted approximately three percent lower than actual salary costs to account for anticipated vacancies that may occur during the fiscal year. The Budget staff evaluated the FY11 budget prior to developing target budgets for FY12. Part of the analysis involved identifying and removal of all “one-time” expenditures (expenditures for capital, special studies and other like items) included in the current budget. Only one-time items not anticipated to be completed in FY11 are included in the FY12 base budget. The target budgets were distributed to the departments to determine any changes that were needed to reflect the department’s ability to provide services at the same level as the prior year. A detailed review of departmental submissions was conducted to ensure that requests were complete and within the guidelines set forth by City Council. The Budget Office prepared and provided budget estimates to departments for many costs including salaries and benefits, equipment replacement, utilities, and other operating costs. Certain costs within the budget were adjusted for inflationary factors. The base budgets were prepared by the departments and were designed to provide the resources needed to maintain current service levels. This year, the base budgets were reduced to reflect organizational restructuring needed to ensure a balanced budget. While it is recognized that these reductions will have an impact on the services provided by the City of College Station, the intent in developing these budgets was to minimize this impact as much as 2 possible. Any material changes in services were submitted as a Service Level Adjustment (SLA) and reviewed by Council during the budget workshops. SLA’s – for increases and reductions - are added to the budget based on several criteria: a) mandates due to federal or state statutes or regulations, contractual agreements, local policies, and capital projects; b) items directly related to the strategic goals of Council; c) other items of general value to the City, either as additions or replacements of added efficiencies or improved services; d) items that maintain or reduce existing service levels in light of fluctuating demands for service. For FY12, due to limited available resources, minimal SLA’s were prepared and submitted. The SLA list was reviewed with department directors and very few approved SLA’s are included in the budget. The Approved SLA list is included in Appendix B. Economic conditions made budget preparation challenging. In order to meet lower than anticipated revenues, expenditures were reduced in FY09, FY10, FY11 and for FY12. The FY09 budget was amended to reduce the budget by $954,175. During FY10, the budget was further reduced by $3,393,098, of which $2,193,338 was from the General Fund. The FY11 budget reductions included 16.5 full time equivalent (FTE) vacant position eliminations along with other budget reductions totaling $1,175,096 City-wide including $993,093 from the General Fund budget. This Approved Budget includes an additional FTE reduction of 27.25 positions, 11 of which were filled. The budget was reduced by a net expenditure reduction of $1,624,696, of which $1,333,207 impacts the General Fund. The City will continue to monitor revenues and expenditures closely during FY12 to ensure the budget remains in balance. Financial Fund Structure  The accounts of the City are organized by fund, each of which operates separately and independently of one another. The operations of each fund are accounted for with a separate set of self-balancing accounts that are comprised of assets, liabilities, fund equity, revenues, and expenditures. Major funds are any governmental fund that has revenues, expenditures, assets and/or liabilities that constitute more than 10% of the revenues, expenditures, assets, or liabilities of the total governmental funds budget. Additionally, the fund must be 5% of the total revenues, expenditures, assets and/or liabilities for the combined governmental funds and enterprise funds budget. Any fund the government feels is of considerable importance to financial statement readers may also be designated as a major fund. Governmental Funds  Governmental funds focus on near-term inflows and outflows of spendable resources. The budgets for the Governmental Funds are prepared using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. This is the same measurement focus and basis of accounting used for governmental fund financial statement reporting. Revenues are recognized as soon as they are both measurable and available. Revenues are considered to be available when they are collectible within the current period. The City considers revenues to be available if they are collected within 30 days of the end of the fiscal year. Expenditures are recognized when the related fund liability is incurred, with the exception of several items. The full listing of these items can be found in the Financial Policies beginning on Appendix page F-1. Major Governmental Funds  The General Fund is the City’s primary operating fund. All general tax revenues and other receipts that are not restricted by law or contractual agreement to some other fund are accounted for in this fund. General operating expenditures, fixed charges, and capital improvement costs that are not paid through other funds are paid from the General Fund. The Debt Service Fund accounts for the financial resources accumulated for the payment of principal, interest and related costs on long-term debt paid primarily from taxes levied by the City. The fund balance of the Debt Service Fund is reserved to signify that the amounts are restricted exclusively for debt service expenditures. The Streets Capital Projects Fund accounts for the costs of street construction and improvements and traffic signalization made with funds primarily provided by proceeds from the sale of long term debt (general obligation bonds and certificates of obligation) and by investing those proceeds. 3 Non‐Major (General) Governmental Funds  Non-major governmental funds include the Economic Development Fund, Efficiency Time Payment Fee Fund, Chimney Hill Fund, Business Park Fund and the College Station portion of the Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency (BVSWMA) Fund. For financial statement reporting purposes, the funds listed above are reported as a part of the Governmental Funds. They are combined into the Governmental Funds in the Summaries of Revenues and Other Financing Sources, and Expenditures and Other Financing Uses for the prior year actual, current year budget, estimated current year actual, and approved budget contained in the Executive Summary section of this budget document. The above listed funds are budgeted as distinct funds. They are prepared using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Non‐Major Governmental Capital Projects Funds  Non-major governmental capital projects funds are used to account for financial resources to be used for the acquisition or construction of significant capital facilities. Funds include the Parks and Recreation Capital Projects Fund and the Facilities and Technology (General Government) Capital Projects Fund. These funds, combined with the Special Revenue Funds, are reported as Non-Major Governmental Funds for financial statement purposes. They are displayed in this format in the Summaries of Revenues and Other Financing Sources, and Expenditures and Other Financing Uses for the prior year actual, current year budget, estimated current year actual and approved budget contained in the Executive Summary section of this budget document. Special Revenue Funds  Special revenue funds are used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are legally restricted to expenditures for specific purposes. Funds include the Hotel Tax Fund, Community Development Fund, American Recovery Reinvestment Act Fund (ARRA), Traffic Safety Fund, Wolf Pen Creek Tax Increment Financing District Fund, Court Technology Fee Fund, Court Security Fee Fund, Juvenile Case Manager Fee Fund, Police Seizure Fund, Recreation Fund, Parkland Dedication (Parks Escrow) Fund, the Memorial Cemetery Fund, the Memorial Cemetery Perpetual Care Fund, the Cemetery Perpetual Care Fund and the Drainage Fund. All special revenue funds are considered non-major and are prepared using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Enterprise Funds  Enterprise funds account for the acquisition, operation and maintenance of government facilities and services that are self-supported by user fees. The budgets for these funds are also prepared using the modified accrual basis of accounting and the current financial resources measurement focus. The budget measures the net change in working capital (current assets less current liabilities). Enterprise Fund financial statements are prepared using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting, where revenues are recorded when earned. Expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Thus, a measurement focus adjustment is necessary to arrive at Actual Working Capital because the enterprise funds’ working capital results from using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting for financial statement purposes. The City’s enterprise funds are listed below. Major Enterprise Funds  The Electric Fund accounts for the activities necessary to provide electric services to the residents of the City. These activities include administration, distribution system operations and maintenance, transmission system operations and maintenance, capital improvements, financing, and related debt service. Billing and collection services are accounted for separately as an internal service fund. The Water Fund accounts for the activities necessary to provide water services to the residents of the City. These activities include administrative services, water production and distribution system operations and maintenance, capital improvements, financing, and related debt service. Billing and collection services are accounted for as an internal service fund. 4 The Wastewater Fund accounts for the activities necessary to provide sewer collection and treatment services to the residents of the City. These activities include administrative services, wastewater system operations and maintenance, capital improvements, financing, and related debt service. Billing and collection services are accounted for as an internal service fund. Non‐Major Enterprise Funds  The City’s Sanitation Fund and Parking Enterprise Fund are non-major enterprise funds. Additionally, the City has several impact fee funds that are not budgeted. These include the Harley Davidson Area, Service Area 92-01, Spring Creek Area, Alum Creek Area, and Steeplechase Area Funds. Internal Service Funds  Internal service funds account for services and/or commodities furnished by a designated program to other programs within the City. Funds include the Self-Insurance Funds (Property Casualty, Employee Benefits, Workers Compensation, and Unemployment), Equipment Replacement Fund, Utility Customer Service Fund, and the Fleet Maintenance Fund. The funds are considered non-major and are budgeted on the modified accrual basis of accounting. All Funds Governmental Funds Capital Projects Funds Streets, Traffic, Sidewalks, and Trails (Major Fund) Parks & Recreation Projects Facilities & Technology Business Park Fun d Drainage Fund Water Fund (Major Fund) Wastewater Fund (Major Fund) Sanitation Fund Parking Enterprise Fund BVSWMA Fund Capital Projects Funds Electric Water Wastewater Electric Fund (Major Fund) Enterprise Funds Memorial Cemetery Perpetual Care Fund Cemetery Perpetual Care Fund Hotel Tax Fund Community Development Fund ARRA of 2009 Fund Traffic Safety Fund Wolf Pen Creek TIF Fund Court Technology Fee Fund Court Security Fee Fund Juvenile Case Manager Fee Fund Police Seizure Fund Parkland Dedication Fund City of College Station Fund Structure General Fund (Major Fund) Debt Service Fund (Major Fund) Economic Development Fund Recreation Fund Efficiency Time Payment Fee Fund Memorial Cemetery Fund Chimney Hill Fund Special Revenue Funds Internal Service Funds Insurance Funds Equipment Replacement Fund Utility Customer Service Fund Fleet Maintenance Fund 5 Fiscal and Budgetary Policies  Each year as part of the budget process, Fiscal and Budgetary Policies are reviewed. These policies are included as Appendix F in this document. These policies serve as the framework for preparing the budget as well as for the financial management of the City. During the budget preparation process these policies are reviewed with Council. Strategic Plan   In College Station, we continually strive for excellence. We conduct daily business as a City aiming to provide our citizens with the best quality of life possible. The City Council and City staff work hard to ensure that we are moving in a direction that is best for the overall character and betterment of our community based on the voices and opinions of those living in College Station. A highly qualified workforce, an extremely engaged citizenry and a set of focused goals are the cornerstones of what make this a successful community. This is a one-of-a-kind community with a unique set of service demands from our citizens. As such, we demand a higher degree of innovation, technology and overall performance from our employees and staff. We have some of the most motivated and highly productive employees in their respective fields and they focus on forward thinking policies that retain the integrity and standard of service to which our citizens have become accustomed. The Strategic Plan is a collaboration of the City Council and the numerous City departments working together to create a cohesive forward direction for College Station in the upcoming years. Updates were made to the plan as a result of the City Council’s annual strategic planning retreat. The following is an outline for the goals and practices we have set to achieve in the near future so that each citizen may enjoy a greater quality of life than ever before. Mission Statement  ON BEHALF OF THE CITIZENS OF COLLEGE STATION, HOME OF TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY, WE WILL CONTINUE TO PROMOTE AND ADVANCE THE COMMUNITY'S QUALITY OF LIFE. Community Vision   College Station, the proud home of Texas A&M University and the heart of the Brazos Valley, will be a vibrant, progressive, knowledge-based community which promotes the highest quality of life by…  ensuring safe, tranquil, clean, and healthy neighborhoods with enduring character;  increasing and maintaining the mobility of College Station citizens through a well planned and constructed inter-modal transportation system;  expecting sensitive development and management of the built and natural environment;  supporting well planned, quality and sustainable growth;  valuing and protecting our cultural and historical community resources;  developing and maintaining quality cost-effective community facilities, infrastructure and services which ensure our city is cohesive and well connected; and  pro-actively creating and maintaining economic and educational opportunities for all citizens College Station will remain among the friendliest and most responsive of communities and a demonstrated partner in maintaining and enhancing all that is good and celebrated in the Brazos Valley. It will forever be a place where Texans and the world come to learn. City of College Station Core Values   To promote:  The health, safety, and general well being of the community  Excellence in customer service  Fiscal responsibility  Involvement and participation of the citizenry  Collaboration and cooperation  Regionalism: active member of the Brazos Valley community and beyond  Activities that promote municipal empowerment 6 Organizational Values:  Respect everyone  Deliver excellent service  Risk, Create, Innovate  Be one city, one team  Be personally responsible  Do the right thing - act with integrity and honesty  Have fun Using the community vision, mission statement, and values as a spring board, the College Station City Council has set the strategic direction for the city government through development of six goals with supporting action agendas. The Strategic Plan focuses organizational resources and identifies those intentional actions to be undertaken by city government to achieve the desired outcomes. I. Financially Sustainable City   Wise stewardship of the financial resources provided to the City resulting in its ability to meet current service demands and obligations without compromising the ability of future generations to do the same. II. Providing Core Services and Infrastructure  Efficiently, effectively and strategically placed core services and infrastructure that maintains citizens’ health, safety, and general welfare and enables the city’s economic growth and physical development.  III. Neighborhood Integrity  Long-term viable and appealing neighborhoods. IV. Diverse Growing Economy  Diversified economy generating quality, stable full-time jobs, bolstering the sales and property tax base and contributing to a high quality of life. V. Improving Mobility  Safe, efficient and well-connected multi-modal transportation system designed to contribute to a high-quality of life and be sensitive to surrounding uses. VI. Sustainable City  Wise stewardship of the natural resources and features needed to meet current demands without compromising the ability of future generations to do the same. College Station Growth Trends  The following sections highlight some of the key factors used in the preparation of the FY12 budget. These include a summary of the City’s key economic indicators and the financial forecast. Economic Indicators  The past year continued to be a difficult one for the economy at all levels, including locally. This year the State Legislature ultimately passed a budget that reduced funding for education at all levels in the State. It is still not known what the ultimate impact of these reductions will be to the local economy, but higher education jobs are the primary driver of the local job market. The uncertainty in the economy results in lower spending levels impacting key revenue streams such as sales tax. Historically, growth has provided some of the additional resources needed to maintain service levels to the citizens and visitors of College Station. Indicators of growth include population increases, building activity, unemployment rate, ad valorem tax revenues, and sales tax revenues. Economic conditions will continue to be closely monitored this next year, and if sales tax and other revenues do not perform as forecasted certain proposals in the budget will be delayed or will not occur. 7 The 1990 Census reported the population of College Station to be 52,456. The 2000 Census reported the population to be 67,890. In 2010 the population Census count was 93,857. The current estimated population, provided by Planning & Development Services, through September 2011, is 96,666. This is a 42% increase in population since 2000, and an 84% increase since 1990. The population is projected to grow by approximately two percent per year over the next five years. *The above graph shows population growth in College Station over the last several years and projects an average 2% growth from 2012 - 2014. 2011 reflects actual through September 2011(source: Planning and Development Services Department). 1. Building Permits and Development: In 2010, the value of building permits issued was approximately $255 million. The new property value added to the ad valorem tax base in 2011 was approximately $148 million. Single family residential permit activity has decreased so far this year from last year, while commercial and apartment permitting has increased. From January through September 2011, 348 single family home permits, 53 new commercial permits and 49 apartment permits were issued; whereas, 386 single family home permits, 46 new commercial permits and 9 apartment permits were issued for this period last year. 2. From January through September 2011, the City issued permits with a value of approximately $146.1 million. Of this amount, $59.4 million in commercial construction was permitted and $86.6 million in residential construction was permitted. Much of this permitted value will likely turn into new taxable assessed value in the next 1-2 years. 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 *2011 *2012 *2013 *2014 College  Station Population The above chart gives an overview of development over the last 10 years as well as the year to date actual through September 2011. 8 2. Unemployment Rate: The most recent statistics available from the Texas Work Force Commission show an average unemployment rate of 6.3% through September of 2011. 3. Ad Valorem Valuations: Beginning in 1995, total taxable assessment rose from approximately $1.5 billion to over $5.5 billion in 2010. The certified values for 2011 are $5,738,615,002. This represents an increase of $280,921,622 or 5.2% over 2010. Of this increase, 53% or $147,680,330 is due to new value being added to the tax rolls, and 47% or $133,241,292 is due to increases in existing values. Increases in ad valorem value this year are directly related to new construction and increases in existing value in the City. Current residential and commercial projects underway are anticipated to add to the ad valorem tax base in 2012. As taxable ad valorem value increases, particularly through growth, it provides additional resources for both capital projects and operating and maintenance costs of providing services for both the General Fund and the Debt Service Fund. This increase provides additional revenues needed to meet increasing service demands associated with growth in the City. The ad valorem tax rate approved for FY12 totals 43.7995 cents per $100 valuation. The approved tax rate is equal to the effective tax rate which is the tax rate needed to generate the same revenues on the same properties this year as last year. 4. Sales Tax Revenues: Sales tax is the largest single revenue source for the General Fund, accounting for approximately 37% of General Fund revenues. College Station saw sales tax numbers decline in FY09 and FY10. FY11 estimated year end sales tax revenues are projected to increase approximately 3% over the sales tax received in FY10. In FY12, sales tax revenues are projected to grow by 2% over the FY11 estimate. Moderate growth is projected for future years. 5. Total Utility Revenues: Utility revenues continue to increase from year to year. Changes in revenues have been affected by increased purchased power costs, rate changes, and weather conditions. Financial Forecast  The financial forecast is a tool used to indicate the actual and possible results of decisions made by Council over a number of years. The forecast has become an integral part of the planning and budget preparation processes. The forecast provides an opportunity to think strategically about the best ways to address growing service demand issues in the next several years. It also serves as the foundation for continued financial planning in the next 12 to 18 months. An overview of the financial forecast will be reviewed with Council as part of the budget review process, and Council will continue to be updated throughout FY12. It will be critical to monitor revenues and expenditures closely in FY12 to ensure that any slowdown in revenues can be proactively addressed. If revenues flatten out or decline, it will be necessary to consider further budget reductions. In addition, alternatives on how services are delivered, as well as how some of these additional needs are funded in the future, are being reviewed. Efforts continue to examine new and different revenue streams. $13.5 $13.8 $15.0 $15.4 $16.7 $18.0 $19.8 $19.4 $19.3 $20.0 $20.4 $21.2 $21.6 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 estFY12 estFY13 estFY14 estMillions of $Sales Tax  Revenue This chart shows sales tax revenues received by the City of College Station. 9 Property Tax Rate  The approved tax rate of 43.7995 cents per $100 of valuation allows the City to fund growing demands for service. This rate provides for a diversified revenue stream for the City of College Station, which continues to have one of the lowest tax rates among surveyed Texas cities. The chart below reflects the FY12 approved rates.     Utility Rates  The approved budget includes a 5% increase in the Wastewater rates (effective January 1, 2012) to cover operating and capital costs. No rate increases are included for the Electric, Water, Drainage and Sanitation Funds. Positions in the FY12 Budget  As a service providing organization, salaries and benefits account for the largest percentage of City operating expenses. College Station is similar to other cities in this respect. Human resources are also one of the primary assets of the City. When the cost of purchased power is excluded, personnel expenditures account for approximately 65% of total City operating and maintenance expenditures. The FY12 approved budget, including SLA’s, funds 916.25 Full Time Equivalent (FTE) positions. A result of the organizational restructuring implemented by the City Manager’s Office was the elimination of 27.25 FTE positions throughout the organization. Eleven of the eliminated positions were filled. The eliminated positions College Station continues to have one of the lowest tax rates among surveyed Texas cities with a population of 50,000 to 100,000. 10 included two Director level positions, as well as middle management positions and entry-level positions. The decisions leading up to the elimination of these positions were exceptionally difficult, but will result in the refocusing of resources on core services. It is important to point out that eliminating these positions may have an impact on services that can be provided by the City of College Station, yet these reductions were necessary to address the current budget conditions. The FY12 Approved Budget does, however, fund several new positions including the addition of an Assistant Internal Auditor, created through the SLA process, which will support the operations of the City’s Internal Auditor. Additionally, a total of $1,853,555 has been included in the FY12 budget for the operations and maintenance associated with the opening of Fire Station #6. This includes the salary and benefits for the hiring of an ambulance crew (nine personnel) and an engine crew (nine personnel). Nine of these positions were approved as part of the FY11 Approved Budget, but the positions were not filled due to the delay in the construction of the fire station. The remaining nine positions were approved and added to the FY12 budget as part of the SLA process. The City budgets for temporary/seasonal employees by calculating the number of hours worked and approximating the number of FTE positions. The approved budget includes approximately 57.75 FTE temporary/seasonal positions. The Parks and Recreation Department makes extensive use of these funds for seasonal programs and other departments also utilize these resources. Approved Budget Changes (from Proposed)  The FY12 Approved Budget includes a number of changes from the original FY12 Proposed Budget. These changes were approved by the City Council to be incorporated into the FY12 Approved Budget and result in a net reduction of $108,322 across all funds from the FY12 Proposed Budget to the FY12 Approved Budget. Of this reduction, $101,322 is included in the General Fund budget. Changes include the reallocation of $100,000 from the General Fund to the Hotel Tax Fund for the funding of affiliate organizations that apply for funding through the Arts Council of the Brazos Valley, a reduction of $14,000 from the Mayor and Council’s budget to reduce travel and training for one year, a $21,753 reduction in funding for the Brazos Valley Animal Shelter, a $25,000 reduction in funding for the Research Valley Partnership, an increase of $5,000 to fund planning and organization of the City’s upcoming 75th Anniversary celebration, and a $54,431 increase for the aforementioned addition of the Assistant Internal Auditor position. 804.50 804.75  832.75  867.25  886.75  904.00  935.50 941.00 935.50  916.25  2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011  Revised 2012  Approved Full Time Equivalent Positions The above graph is based on Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) which include full and part-time positions, as well as temporary/seasonal positions, over the last 10 years. 11 As mentioned previously, the Hotel Tax Fund budget was increased by $100,000 to fund affiliate organizations through the Arts Council of the Brazos Valley. In addition, funding in the Hotel Tax Fund was reduced by $62,000 to reflect a reduction in funding to the Brazos Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau (CVB). This resulted in a net $38,000 increase to the Hotel Tax Fund budget. Additionally, $50,000 in Hotel Tax funding for the George Bush Library that was previously passed to the Library through the CVB will be funded directly from the Hotel Tax Fund in FY12. This last change will have no net impact on the fund. Other changes reflected in the approved budget include the elimination of transfers totalling $45,000 from Enterprise Funds to the Economic Development Fund. This includes a $12,500 transfer from the Water Fund, a $20,000 transfer from the Wastewater Fund and a $12,500 transfer from the Sanitation Fund. Finally, the approved budget reflects a delay of three months in the 5% rate increase that was approved in the Wastewater Fund. The rate increase will be effective January 1, 2012. Pay Changes  The FY12 Approved Budget includes $1,228,580 in performance based pay increases. This represents an average 2.5% increase in pay and related benefits. It is imperative that we retain the best, most highly qualified and talented staff and these increases should help keep the city pay competitive. These pay increases are scheduled to go into effect beginning October 2011. These approved pay increases are only possible due to the other reductions that have been made in the approved budget. The approved budget also includes funding for the continuation of the step plan in the College Station Police Department. The first phase was implemented in FY10, with an additional phase in FY11. Funding for the final phase, which will impact Sergeants and Lieutenants, is included in the FY12 Approved Budget. It is anticipated that the full implementation of the step pay plan will allow the Police Department to be more competitive in recruiting and retaining officers. Capital Improvement Projects  The approved Capital Improvements Program Budget for FY12 totals $37,349,793 for all funds that include capital projects. This budget amount does not, however, reflect all projected capital expenditures for FY12. In the case of projects for which funds have already been approved and budgeted, the City may continue to spend money to complete these projects without including the projected FY12 expense as a new appropriation. The project budgets that have been appropriated carry forward until the project is complete. Only portions of the projects that have not been previously appropriated are included as new appropriations in the FY12 budget. The total projected to be spent on capital projects including both new appropriations as well as existing appropriations is approximately $56 million. In FY12, it is anticipated that capital project expenditures for both general government and utility capital projects will be significant. Infrastructure rehabilitation and improvement projects are also scheduled in FY12. Projects underway include a number of street projects from the 2003 and 2008 bond authorizations, such as street rehabilitation and extension projects, facility, park and fire station projects. There are a number of Water and Wastewater capital projects that will incur expense in FY12. These projects are discussed in greater detail later in the budget overview and in the capital projects section of this document.   12 Net Budget Expenditure Comparison  The table to the right shows the approved net operating and maintenance expenditures for FY12. Expenditures are budgeted to be $246,554,877, a 5.61% increase from the FY11 original budget. The majority of this increase is in the capital budget. Transfers from the fund balance for capital projects in FY12 are budgeted to be $3,345,000, and the net approved capital budget is $34,004,793. The latter two items will provide a total of $37,349,793 of new budget appropriation for capital projects. Fund Approved FY11  Budget Approved FY12  Budget Percent   Change General Fund 54,617,067 54,898,894 0.52% Combined Utilities 122,498,153 122,670,715 0.14% Sanitation 7,014,768 7,430,014 5.92% BVSWMA 1,457,339 1,393,401 -4.39% Drainage 1,270,182 1,367,058 7.63% General Debt Service 12,581,958 12,649,002 0.53% Hotel Tax 2,200,335 2,123,142 -3.51% Parking Fund 1,748,592 1,085,775 -37.91% Parks Xtra Education 114,769 - -100.00% Recreation Fund 407,335 1,198,016 194.11% Police Seizure 20,847 40,000 91.87% Wolf Pen Creek TIF - - N/A Municipal Court Funds 310,426 296,820 -4.38% Business Park Fund 250,000 112,150 -55.14% Chimney Hill Fund - 125,000 N/A Community Development 3,558,960 3,667,138 3.04% Traffic Safety Fund 60,000 72,959 21.60% Internal Services Fund 44,416 - -100.00% Cemetery Perpetual Care - - N/A Memorial Cemetery Perpetual Care Fund 10,000 10,000 0.00% Memorial Cemetery Fund 2,764 - -100.00% ARRA Fund 65,000 65,000 0.00% Total O&M Expenditures 208,232,911 209,205,084 0.47% Combined Utilities 6,075,000 3,070,000 -49.47% Community Development - 275,000 N/A Fund Balance/Working Xfers to CIP 6,075,000 3,345,000 -44.94% General Gov’t CIP 9,752,561 10,707,214 9.79% Utilities CIP 4,699,639 19,881,562 323.04% Community Dev. CIP 561,500 1,070,634 90.67% Special Revenue CIP 1,111,013 2,345,383 111.10% Wolf Pen TIF CIP 3,033,313 - -100.00% Total Capital Expenditures 19,158,026 34,004,793 77.50% TOTAL $ 233,465,937 $ 246,554,877 5.61% 13 Budget Overview The text below focuses on the various City departments and functions provided by each department. The majority of the departmental budgets below reflect recurring reductions amounting to $1.624 million in the FY12 budget. Governmental Funds Police Department $14,974,044 The Police Department provides a number of services that help to keep the community safe. Services provided include: 1) police patrol with certified police officers who are assigned to specific areas of the city and who are equipped with police vehicles and all necessary equipment; 2) criminal investigation for the investigation of reported crimes; 3) animal control; 4) communications and emergency medical dispatch support for police, fire and EMS; 5) short term jail/detention facilities that reduce the processing time of arrests; and 6) a recruiting and training division that serves as a support and training function for the Department. The Police Department FY12 approved budget includes one service level adjustment (SLA). Fit Life Testing, in the amount of $22,375, will provide employees with a cardio risk profile that has been found useful in identifying health risks. This SLA will be reimbursed by the Employee Benefits Fund by the end of the fiscal year. The approved budget also includes funding for the next phase of the step plan for the College Station Police Department. This phase will increase the pay levels for sergeants and lieutenants. The continuation of the step pay plan will allow the Police Department to be more competitive in recruiting and retaining officers. In order to address the ongoing budget conditions, the FY12 base budget for the Police Department included the removal of two full-time Parking Enforcement Officer positions. Fire Department $13,555,824 The Fire Department provides services to College Station, City of Bryan—through an automatic aid program—and to rural areas around College Station through mutual aid agreements. The Fire Department operates out of five stations located throughout the City. The basic services provided by the Fire Department include: 1) fire response; 2) emergency medical response; 3) fire prevention services, including commercial fire safety inspections and fire prevention training at local schools and various functions; and 4) hazardous material response. There are four approved service level adjustments in the Fire Department. Three of these SLA’s are for anticipated O&M costs associated with the opening of Fire Station #6. A total of $1,853,555 has been included in the FY12 budget for this purpose. This includes the salary and benefits for the hiring of an ambulance crew (nine personnel) and an engine crew (nine personnel). Nine of these positions were approved as part of the FY11 Approved Budget, but the positions were not filled due to the delay in the construction of the fire station. The remaining nine positions were approved in the FY12 budget as part of the SLA process. Other O&M costs related to Fire Station #6 that are The above graph illustrates incidents responded to by the Fire Department over the last several years. The above graph illustrates calls for service. A “call for service” is defined as any event or situation, reported by a citizen that requires a response from the Police Department. 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 est.Number of IncidentsIncidents Dispatched EMS FIRE 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 est. Calls for Service 14 in the approved budget includes funding for various supplies and maintenance, as well as purchased services such as utility costs. The fourth SLA, in the amount of $80,000, has been included in the approved budget for maintenance costs at Fire Station #4 (located at Easterwood Airport). This maintenance will include the replacement of flooring in high travel areas, the cleaning of HVAC system and a major overhaul of bay doors which is needed to address ongoing issues with delays to emergency response. Half of the cost of this SLA will be reimbursed by Texas A&M University. Public Works Department $6,823,880 The Public Works Department maintains streets, drainage, and the City’s traffic control system. It is also responsible for refuse collection as well as fleet and facilities maintenance. The Drainage Maintenance Division, previously reimbursed by the Drainage Fund, will be funded directly out of the Drainage Fund beginning in FY12. In addition, the Capital Projects Department was moved into the Public Works Department for FY12. Public Works submitted the following ongoing reductions in FY12: $2,059 for travel and training in Traffic Engineering; $10,000 for office painting in Facilities Maintenance; $17,000 in Streets Maintenance for charge back utility cut repair costs; and $4,800 in savings by converting a take home vehicle to a pool vehicle. The Traffic Engineering Division conducts and reviews traffic engineering studies & plans and evaluates on-street parking throughout the City. Additionally, the Traffic Engineering Division engages in public education, special programs, and project management of related capital projects. The Facilities Maintenance Division provides support services to City departments through the maintenance of City facilities. This includes heating, ventilation and cooling systems. Additionally, Facilities Maintenance performs minor building construction and remodeling activities. The Division also repairs and/or replaces equipment in a timely manner. The Facilities Maintenance division submitted an SLA for $25,000 to fund a structural evaluation of the College Station Conference Center which is included in the FY12 approved budget. The Streets Maintenance Division of the Public Works Department strives to ensure that the street system within the City of College Station is properly maintained. This is done through a number of programs, including a street rehabilitation program that addresses street repair before more expensive reconstruction measures are needed. The Streets Division coordinates with the Engineering and Capital Projects Divisions to plan and develop major street projects. The Streets Division also provides routine pothole patching and other maintenance services. The Streets Division measures the effectiveness of this service by determining whether 95% of the streets in the City have a grade of 85 or better using the Pavement Management System. Funds in the amount of $350,000 are included in the approved budget for thoroughfare street overlay projects. Street overlay projects approved for next fiscal year with these funds include Rock Prairie Road West, Brothers Blvd, Post Oak Circle, Muirfield Village, Jones Butler, and Hardwood. The Traffic Signs & Markings and Traffic Signals Divisions in College Station service and maintain integral traffic flow control mechanisms throughout the City. The system is critical to City operations, most notably during peak traffic times such as the very busy Texas A&M football season. These divisions are also responsible for maintaining and repairing traffic signals and school warning devices in order to provide safe and efficient movement of vehicles and pedestrians. The Capital Projects Division is responsible for the administration of the City’s capital improvement plan. This includes the management of projects approved with bond elections such as streets, fire stations, libraries, and others. Some of the capital projects for public utilities such as Electric, Water, Wastewater, and Drainage are also handled in this division. 300,000 500,000 969,806 489,008 500,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 est. Streets Maintenance Division: Number of Asphalt Failure Repairs (square feet) 15 Parks and Recreation Department General Fund: $5,044,666 Recreation Fund: $3,811,342 The Parks and Recreation Department (PARD) is responsible for College Station park facilities and recreational programs. The PARD budget is split between the Recreation Fund and the General Fund. The Recreation Fund includes Sports Programs, Aquatics, Xtra Education programs, Teen and Senior programs and Conference Center operations. The remaining Parks and Recreation activities, such as maintenance of park facilities, heritage programs, athletic tournaments, special events at the Wolf Pen Creek Amphitheater and other park locations throughout the City, and cemetery maintenance and operations are budgeted in the General Fund. The Parks and Recreation Department recently underwent a management reorganization resulting in the net elimination of 6.5 FTEs. Recreation Fund Divisions: Each program within the Recreation Fund has a fully costed budget, which not only includes revenue and direct costs, but also includes indirect administrative costs, field costs, General and Administrative transfers, as well as the subsidy provided by the General Fund. The Sports Division approved budget is $1,365,850 and includes programs such as Adult Softball, Adult Volleyball, Youth Basketball, Youth Football, Girls Softball, Youth Volleyball, Adult Kickball, Challenger Sports, Tennis, and several non-fee programs. The Instruction Division is comprised of the Xtra Education Program which has an approved budget of $244,156 and provides citizens of all ages the opportunity to enhance their quality of life through various continuing education programs that are offered at various sites throughout the City. The Aquatics Division approved budget of $1,137,816 supports three City pools, programs at the CSISD Natatorium, the splash pad at the Lincoln Center, swim lessons, water fitness, the swim team and stroke clinic. The budget for the Southwood Center and Lincoln Center Division totals $704,846. Several teen and senior activities take place daily at the Southwood Center and the Lincoln Center is a community/recreation center that provides positive programming and serves as a satellite center for social services. The Conference Center Division is operated to provide meeting space for various groups and organizations and the approved budget for FY12 is $358,674. The PARD Recreation Fund budget includes three approved service level adjustments which would reduce expenditures by a net of $131,623. The first SLA is for the elimination of the Concessions as a separate cost center. The concessions will only be managed by the City for Adult Softball and at Adamson Lagoon. This is estimated to save $12,000 in Temporary/Seasonal employee costs. The next SLA changes the programming at the CSISD 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 est. Conference Center Attendance The above graphs illustrate the fluctuations in attendance at pool facilities and the Conference Center. 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 est. Pool Attendance 16 Natatorium, which is estimated to save a net $56,129. The final SLA discontinues and/or reduces the seasons for a few of the sports programs, including flag football, adult volleyball, and adult kickball for an additional reduction of $63,494 and one (1) FTE. Also approved is to move the responsibility of the youth fastpitch softball program to the Brazos Valley Girls Softball Association, with whom the City already partners to facilitate the program. General Fund Divisions: The Parks and Recreation Department (PARD) Administration Division budget of $498,060 serves as the primary point of contact for its customers and provides administrative support to the rest of the department. This division also provides coordination, design and administration of some of the parks and recreation capital improvement projects, graphics support, marketing development, emergency shelter operations and website administration. The PARD Recreation Division budget of $895,213 oversees Youth and Adult Athletics, Aquatics, Instruction programs, Tournament events and Kids Klub. The Kids Klub is an after school care program, operated in collaboration with the College Station Independent School District (CSISD). The PARD Special Facilities Division budget of $87,915 is responsible for the operations of the Lincoln Center, the Conference Center, the Southwood Center (Teens and Senior programs), Heritage Programs, and the Larry J. Ringer Library. Also, within this division, is the oversight of special events held at the Wolf Pen Creek Amphitheater as well as other locations throughout the City. One of the changes resulting from the management reorganization was the combination of the Operations Division and the Urban Landscapes Division. This division is responsible for maintenance and operations of the City park facilities, athletic facilities, selected streetscape areas, the City Cemetery and the new Memorial Cemetery. This division also provides support for special events, programs and other City activities. The approved buget for the Operations and Urban Landscapes Divisions are $2,408,518 and $1,154,960, respectively. The Parks and Recreation Department General Fund budget includes four approved service level adjustments in the amount of $45,200. The first SLA in the amount of $18,000 one-time funds and $25,000 recurring costs will replace the current registration and reservation software that PARD uses. The second SLA, for $22,200, will provide funding for athletic fields maintenance equipment. The third SLA provides for the reduction and relocation of Christmas in the Park for a savings of $25,000 annually. The last SLA provides $5,000 in one-time funds for the funding of the City of College Station 75th Birthday Celebration. Larry J. Ringer Library $1,071,654 The Larry J. Ringer Library facility is overseen by the City’s Parks and Recreation Department. This facility is operated in collaboration with City of Bryan, which provides staffing for the College Station facility. The graph to the right illustrates the circulation of the College Station Library over the last several years. Planning and Development Services Department $3,761,302 The Planning and Development Services Department provides oversight for development planning within the City of College Station. Planning and Development Services consists of the following components; Planning & Development Administration, Community Development, Engineering, Code Enforcement, Neighborhood Services, Northgate District, and Strategic Planning. Planning and Development Services reinforces compliance with zoning, subdivision, and drainage regulations as well as other City ordinances. This department works with citizens and other City departments to ensure City development in a manner consistent with policies established by Council. 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 est. Library Circulation 17 As part of the ongoing reductions, Planning and Development Services FY12 base budget includes the permanent elimination of one full-time GIS Technician, one full-time Code Enforcement Officer, and one full-time Planning Administrator. In addition, grant funds from the Community Development Block Grant will be utilized to fund one half of a full-time Building Inspector position. The FY12 budget includes a one-time SLA in the amount of $50,000 for the Wellborn Small Area Plan. This project supports the creation of a district plan for the recently annexed area that respects and preserves the appeal of the area. The focus of this district plan should be working with the residents to identify and retain the elements of the community that contribute to its rural character. Information Technology Department $3,975,499 Information Technology implements and maintains the technology and computer based information systems used by all City Departments. The Information Technology department includes IT Administration, Management Information Services (MIS), Geographic Information Services (GIS), E-Government, Mail, and Communication Services. The MIS division implements and supports computing platforms and applications for all City Departments, including Computer Aided Dispatch (911) for Public Safety, and connectivity to the Internet. The GIS division is responsible for the coordination of all geographic data and its presentation to the public. The E-Government division is responsible for the City website, interactive web service provision, and the City’s Intranet. Communications provides connectivity within the city for cable and fiber. Funding in the amount of $196,876 is included in the approved budget for the Brazos Valley Wide Area Communications System (BVWACS) which provides a wide area communications system that promotes radio system interoperability for public safety and emergency management operations. Due to an ongoing need for budget reductions, one full-time Systems Analyst, one half-time Mail Clerk, and one temporary / seasonal GIS Intern position have been permanently eliminated from Information Technology’s approved base budget. The FY12 approved budget also includes a reduction of $17,140 in overtime for the MIS division. Fiscal Services Department $3,054,633 The Fiscal Services Department provides Fiscal Administration, Treasury, Accounting, Purchasing, and Budgeting services to the City. This department also oversees the operations of Municipal Court and Utility Customer Service. Treasury handles cash and debt issues for the City while ensuring all funds are prudently invested. The Accounting and Purchasing Divisions work closely together to ensure that purchases are made and recorded according to mandates. Municipal Court collects fines and fees for the City while providing the City with administration for cases filed for enforcement of Class C misdemeanors. The Office of Budget and Strategic Planning prepares, monitors, and reviews the annual budget. In order to address the ongoing budget conditions, the FY12 base budget for the Fiscal Services department includes removing one full-time Secretary position. No service level adjustments were submitted for Fiscal Services. General Government Department $3,674,203 The General Government Department includes many of the administrative functions of the City. The Mayor and Council Division accounts for expenditures related to Council functions such as education and training. The approved budget for this division is $30,276. Additional one time reductions in travel and training in the amount of $14,000 were submitted as savings for the Mayor and Council division. The City Secretary Division is responsible for elections, records management, City Council support and other activities. The FY12 approved budget is $385,346. This includes one service level adjustment in the amount of $13,275 for ongoing maintenance fees to provide codification services for the city. 18 The Internal Auditor Division conducts independent financial and performance audits to provide the Council and the Mayor with objective information to assist in determining whether governmental operations are adequately controlled and to assure that a high degree of public accountability is maintained. The Internal Audit approved FY12 budget is $177,379, which includes an SLA with $2,196 in one-time and $52,235 in recurring costs for a new, Assistant Internal Auditor. The City Manager Division is responsible for the day to day operations of the City, making recommendations to the City Council, and providing short and long-term direction to the organization. The FY12 City Manager’s approved budget is $901,097. The approved budget includes reductions in goodwill, food and ice, and supplies for an ongoing savings of $2,460. Economic Development is responsible for coordinating economic development activities in College Station. For FY12, the Economic Development division was restructured and will have one Economic Development Analyst position which will be moved to the City Manager’s Office. One Assistant Director and one half of a Staff Assistant position will move to the Planning and Development Services Department, and one analyst will fill a vacant Budget/Management Analyst position. The Director position will be eliminated. Overall there will be a net budget reduction of $324,170. The Legal Division provides legal services and support to City Council and City staff. Among the services provided by this office are legal advice, contract writing, and litigation. The Legal Office budget is $944,591 which includes the reclassification of one First Assistant City Attorney position to an Assistant City Attorney position which will provide ongoing salary and benefits savings. The Public Communications Division provides for the dissemination of City information through various media outlets. The total FY12 approved budget is $691,556, which includes the elimination of funds used for internships. The approved budget submission includes ongoing reductions in contract services, food and ice, and postage in the amount of $3,750. Funds are included for Educational and Governmental (EG) franchise dollars in the amount of $30,000. These funds can only be used to purchase, replace, or help produce the College Station educational television channel. The Human Resources Division consists of Human Resources and Risk Management (which is funded by the Insurance Funds). The Human Resources Division is responsible for the strategy and implementation of the compensation & benefits program for all employees. The division also provides the recruiting and hiring of qualified candidates for City positions. In addition, policy interpretation and performance management programs are coordinated through Human Resources. The Risk Management function seeks to limit the exposure of the City to physical and financial losses through a number of programs that address worker safety. Included in the approved budget is the elimination of the Safety Officer position. Other General Fund Expenditures $4,631,544 There are a number of expenditures budgeted in the General Fund that do not fall under the purview of any one department. Miscellaneous expenditures within the General Fund include $932,563 for public agency funding, $271,098 for contingency transfers and $3,427,883 for other various expenditures and transfers. These various expenditures and transfers include the General Fund Subsidy Transfer to the Recreation Fund, the transfer to the Economic Development Fund, and State Legislative Consulting services. Debt Service Fund $12,649,002 The Debt Service Fund is used to account for ad valorem tax revenue collected to pay for authorized general government debt. The approved debt service portion of the ad valorem tax totals 20.1536 cents per $100 valuation, which accounts for approximately 46% of the tax levy. This is a reduction of nearly 2 cents from the FY11 debt service portion of the tax rate. Economic Development Fund $728,454 The City created an Economic Development Fund to account for resources and expenditures directed at providing incentives for businesses and industries that are planning to locate in College Station. Resources set aside for economic development purposes will be transferred into this fund and remain in the fund until expended. In FY12, $398,900 is budgeted in this fund for economic development cash assistance incentives. The city’s Economic 19 Development activities have been restructured and will be managed by the City Manager’s Office. The FY12 Approved Budget includes an SLA in the amount of $75,000 for the development of an Economic Development plan. A $250,000 transfer to the Electric Fund is also scheduled in FY12. Efficiency Time Payment Fee Fund $0 The Efficiency Time Payment Fee can be used for the purpose of improving the efficiency of the administration of justice in College Station. Anticipated revenues in FY12 total $7,962. There are no approved expenditures in FY12 for this fund. Chimney Hill Fund $125,000 The Chimney Hill Fund accounts for the receipt and expenditure of funds received by the City for the operation and maintenance of a convention center. In FY12, an expenditure of $125,000 has been included for maintenance costs related to the Chimney Hill property on which a convention center is proposed to be built. These expenses will be offset by lease revenue received from existing tenants. Business Park Fund $112,150 Resources are included in the budget for economic development activities. In FY12, it is projected that $112,150 will be transferred from the Business Park Fund to the Economic Development Fund for the Research Valley Partnership’s Texas A&M Institute for Pre-Clinical Studies project. This transfer reflects the balance of the funds in the Business Park Fund with the intent that this fund will be closed at the end of FY12. Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency (BVSWMA) Fund $1,393,401 The City of College Station and City of Bryan set up a corporation to take over the operations of the landfill. The Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency Inc. was created last year. As part of this organization the City of College Station will continue to have landfill employees who will, through an agreement with BVSWMA Inc., provide landfill services. The BVSWMA portion of the budget accounted for in the City of College Station budget is the salary and benefit portion for the College Station landfill employees, which is reimbursed by BVSWMA Inc. Enterprise Funds Electric Fund $98,236,372 College Station's Electric Utility provides the construction of new facilities needed to extend electrical service to new consumers, performs repairs and maintenance as needed to maintain the electric system, and installs and maintains street lights and rental lights. Electric Utility personnel maintain over 20 miles of electric transmission lines, 5 electrical substations, and over 400 miles of overhead and underground electric distribution lines. Two Service Level Adjustments (SLA’s) were included in the FY12 Approved Budget that will reduce expenditures. The first reduction SLA, in the amount of $50,500, results in the elimination of the Goodwill Tree Program that has been included in the electric budget since FY08. Projects funded in the past by this program include trees planted following phase I of the W.D. Fitch Parkway Widening and partial funding of the trees planted at the University Drive/SH 6 interchange. The budget includes shifting these funds from the tree program to a padmount transformer and equipment maintenance program, which is described in more detail below. A second reduction SLA is for the reduction in the Sun Source Solar Photovoltaic Rebate Program. The previous budget for this program was $75,000. The FY12 SLA reduces the budget for this program to $37,500. The program previously paid on a per AC watt installation of $3.00 per watt up to a maximum rebate of $12,000 per customer. In FY12, the per AC watt payment be reduced by one half, or to $1.50 per AC watt, with a maximum rebate of $6,000 per customer. Six SLA’s are included in the Electric Fund’s approved budget that will result in budget increases. The first SLA, in the amount of $102,000, is for the transmission tree-trimming program. The North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) regulations require the Electric Utility to have an ongoing vegetation management program in order to maintain access to the transmission system for system reliability. This program is on a three-year maintenance cycle and this is the second iteration of an ongoing maintenance plan to achieve the requirements. A second SLA is for the addition of training funds to the dispatch division in the amount of $10,000. These funds are needed in order to comply with NERC regulations that require all Transmission Operators to have NERC-certified 20 operating personnel on shift in required positions at all times. The third SLA, in the amount of $50,500, is for the implementation of a padmount transformer and equipment maintenance program. This pilot program will restore the exterior cabinets of padmount transformers and equipment that have been damaged by corrosion from exposure to weather, sprinkler systems and fertilizer. As mentioned above, the budget from the Goodwill Tree Program will be reallocated to fund this program. A fourth SLA is to provide funds for the contracting of services in order to meet Federal guidelines for regular and systematic testing of components comprising our electric system. The Electric Utility must demonstrate how and when the testing was performed and must keep records of such testing as prescribed by mandated protocols. This SLA will provide a budget of $60,000 for the outsourcing of these services. The fifth SLA, in the amount of $65,000, is for the outsourcing of a commercial meter testing program. The program will allow for the testing of 300 commercial meter installations per year. A final SLA will provide the budget needed for the operating costs associated with the new dispatch facility. Construction on the new dispatch facility should be complete in late 2011. This SLA will allocate $14,500 for these costs. In addition to the SLA’s, reductions were made to the base budget as a result of restructuring how certain processes will be handled by the department. Funds for two temporary/seasonal positions were removed from the budget. One of these positions, within the Administration Division, has not been filled in several years. The second position, in the Warehouse Division, was a filled position. Water Fund $14,476,402 The City of College Station has the capacity to produce approximately 30 million gallons per day of potable water. The Water Division has developed high standards of reliability that assures customers’ needs are met with a water supply that meets or exceeds all federal and state mandated standards. As a City enterprise, the full cost of service for water production, transmission and distribution is recovered by charging customers for consumption on a per unit basis. Two SLA’s were included that reduced the FY12 Water Fund approved budget by $45,480. The first SLA, which reduced the budget by $41,480, is for the discontinuation of the addition of fluoride to the drinking water. The addition of fluoride to the drinking water is not legally required and discontinuing the program will result in O&M and capital savings and will improve employee safety by removing this hazardous chemical from the work place. The water supply naturally contains approximately one-half of the recommended level. In addition, a reduction SLA of $4,000 is included to reduce the budget allocated for the conservation rebate program. The current budget for rebates is $8,000. The remaining $4,000 is consistent with rebate payments made in the past two fiscal years, but may limit the program in future years if popularity increases. In addition to the SLA’s, several reductions were made to the base budget as a result of restructuring how certain processes will be handled by the department. A net total of $31,008 was reduced from the budget due to the elimination of the Water Auditor position. When this position became vacant in FY11, it was not filled and the water audit services were contracted out. It has been determined that this is a less costly way to handle the water audits and the results of the audits are comparable. Therefore, the position has been eliminated in FY12. $15,000, however, has been included to offset the cost of contracting out the service. The FY11 budget included the addition of a 0.5 FTE Regulatory Compliance Assistant. This position was responsible for assisting Water Services with evaluating and meeting EPA/TCEQ requirements. The position was shared with the Public Works Department. In FY12, the 0.5 FTE position will be removed from the Water Fund and return at 1.0 FTE to the Public Works Department. A third reduction to the base budget will result in savings of $658. This is for the formal discontinuation of the backflow program. The backflow program was one in which residential lawn irrigation systems were tested on a five year schedule to address potential backflow issues. This testing has not been done in several years. This reduction will result in the formal discontinuation of the program and will reduce the budget for the remaining costs associated with mailings that would need to be done if the program was still in place. Base budget changes included three additions, two of which reflect mandated increases in costs. The first is the addition of $55,000 for an increase in fees assessed by TCEQ that must be paid in order to maintain regulatory compliance. The second is for the addition of $21,622 for an increase in fees assessed by the Brazos Valley Conservation District. These fees are assessed based on the amount of water used by the City. Finally, the base budget was increased by $8,500 to cover the cost of charge-backs that are being proposed by the Public Works Department. Currently, when utility line repairs that are made as part of a streets maintenance O&M project, the cost is covered by the Public Works Department. This base budget was increased in the Water Fund so that the cost can be charged back. 21 Finally, a Council directed change was made to the FY12 Approved Budget that eliminated a transfer in the amount of $12,500 from the Wastewater Fund to the Economic Development Fund. Wastewater Fund $13,027,941 Effective sanitary sewer collection and treatment is essential to public health in an urban environment. Over the last several decades, standards have increased for this infrastructure. Past upgrades to the Carters Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant were directly related to changing standards. As the system continues to grow, additional capital is needed for line extensions. The existing system will have to be maintained with line replacements and plant enhancements and expansions. Wastewater services are provided as an enterprise function with service related fees paying for the cost of service. One SLA is included in the Wastewater Fund that results in an increase of $132,000 to the approved budget. This SLA is for the implementation of a wastewater interceptor cleaning/evaluation program. There are six major wastewater interceptors that collect all of the City's wastewater and transport it to the treatment plants. Currently the City does not own the equipment and technology to perform analysis on pipe of this diameter. By outsourcing the cleaning, capacity analysis and visual construction evaluation of the interceptors, the City can better plan, design and construct infrastructure to meet the increasing development driven demand. The program will allow for this analysis to be performed on one interceptor per year. In addition to the SLA, a reduction was made to the base budget as a result of restructuring how certain processes will be handled by the department. $68,199 was reduced from the budget due to the elimination of the Utilities Analyst position. When this position became vacant in FY11, it was not filled. It has been determined that the functions performed by this position can been allocated to Budget staff in the Finance Department as well as to staff within the Water and Wastewater Departments. Therefore, the position has been eliminated in FY12. Base budget changes included an increase of $8,500 to cover the cost of charge-backs that were approved by the Public Works Department. Currently, when utility line repairs that are made as part of a streets maintenance O&M project, the cost is covered by the Public Works Department. This base budget was increased in the Wastewater Fund so that the cost can be charged back. Finally, a Council directed change was made to the FY12 Approved Budget that eliminated a transfer in the amount of $12,500 from the Wastewater Fund to the Economic Development Fund. Sanitation Fund $7,430,014 The Sanitation Division of Public Works provides services that meet the City’s solid waste collection needs. These services include providing residential containers, curbside recycling, brush and grass clipping collection, street sweeping and the removal of waste. Commercial services are also provided to local businesses and offers collection in small and large containers. Customers with greater volumes have the option of using roll-off containers that are serviced by front load collection equipment. The operating portion of the Sanitation fund for residential and commercial operations is approved for FY12 to be $6,720,027, or 6.67% higher than the FY11 Revised Budget. A portion of this increase is due to an increase in forecasted fuel costs as well as increased equipment replacement contribution amounts due to new EPA standards. Approved non-operating expenditures are $709,987, and include the fund’s Return on Investment to the General Fund. Revenues for FY12 in the fund are estimated to be $7,242,423. Northgate Parking Enterprise Fund $1,085,775 The Northgate Parking Enterprise Fund accounts for parking operations in the Northgate district of the City. This includes the surface parking lot on Patricia Street, the College Main Parking Garage and on-street parking in the - 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 est.In TonsRefuse Collected Residential Commercial 22 district. The approved FY12 budget for parking operations is $448,597, which does not include $220,633 in non- parking related expenditures that will be paid for by a transfer from the General Fund. One-time SLA funding for Capital expenditures in the amount of $80,000 is included. This funding will be used to expand the use of security cameras in the parking garage to the upper parking levels. Northgate Parking Enterprise fund revenues are projected to be $1,159,689 in FY12. Special Revenue Funds Hotel Tax Fund $2,123,142 The City receives a tax of 7% on room rental rates from persons staying in hotels within the City. The City’s use of Hotel Tax funds is limited by State law to be used for the promotion of tourism in the City of College Station. The approved FY12 budget includes $545,698 for City Operations including Wolf Pen Creek event operations and other PARD programs and events that are eligible for Hotel Tax Funds. This includes annual funding in the amount of $200,000 for soliciting and hosting of sports tournaments in College Station. The FY12 debt service payment of $224,444 for the land purchased by the City for a Convention Center project will be transferred to the Debt Service fund for payment. $1,303,000 of Hotel Tax funding is included in the FY12 approved budget for the Bryan/College Station Convention and Visitors Bureau, the Arts Council of the Brazos Valley, the George Bush Presidential Library Foundation, the Brazos Valley Veterans Memorial, Northgate advertising through the Northgate District Association, and the Bryan-College Station Chamber of Commerce. For FY12, $5,500,000 of the fund balance has been reserved for expansion of the City’s Veteran’s Park sports complex. Community Development Fund $5,012,772 Community Development helps provide low cost housing and other public assistance through Community Development Block Grant and Home Grant funds from the federal government. These funds are used to assist low to moderate-income residents of College Station. Assistance is provided through housing services, public agency funding, public facility improvements, and economic development activities. American Recovery Reinvestment Act Fund $65,000 The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Fund accounts for revenue received and expenditures made by the City through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act enacted in 2009. These funds are primarily for one-time equipment and other purchases. ARRA Fund expenditures are estimated to be $65,000 in FY12. This represents the grant funded Sustainability Coordinator position in General Government. The grant will fund this position for a total of 3 years, from FY10 to FY12. Traffic Safety Fund $72,959 The Texas Legislature passed SB 1119 which became effective on September 1, 2007. This bill authorizes and controls the municipal use of red light camera equipment and was codified in the Texas Transportation Code, Section 707.003. Revenue sharing provisions are mandatory: after accounting for program expenditures, one half of all revenues received must be remitted to the state. The state will be using their portion of the revenue received to fund regional trauma centers. The remaining revenue retained by the City must be spent on traffic safety programs, intersection improvements, pedestrian safety programs, public safety programs and/or traffic enforcement programs. The City implemented the red light camera program in calendar year 2008 with 4 monitored intersections. In FY10, cameras were added to 5 additional intersection approaches. On November 3, 2009, an election was held in which the majority of the voters voted to end the red light camera program. The FY12 approved budget of $72,959 includes a 1-time SLA of $50,000 to fund the City’s participation in the B/CS Mobility Initiative. $22,959 in approved expenditures will use the remaining funds for traffic safety programs and intersection improvements, which will close out the fund at the end of FY12. Wolf Pen Creek TIF Fund $0 The Wolf Pen Creek Tax Increment Finance (TIF) Zone generates revenues that must be utilized within the Wolf Pen Creek District. The TIF expired December 31st, 2009. A balance of approximately $3.2 million remains in the WPC TIF Fund. A determination will be made in FY12 as to how the remaining balance will be spent. 23 Court Technology Fee Fund $133,880 The Court Technology Fee Fund can be used to fund technology projects at the Municipal Court Facility. Approved expenditures of $133,880 will be used for technology related purchases such as computer hardware and software for court facilities. Court Security Fee Fund $65,040 The Court Security Fee Fund is used to fund security projects at the Municipal Court building. Approved expenditures of $65,040 are included for court security personnel in this fund. To address the limited revenues in this fund, a full-time Marshal position was moved into the General Fund Municipal Court budget beginning in FY12. Juvenile Case Manager Fee Fund $97,900 The Juvenile Case Manager Fee Fund is used to fund the salary and benefits of a Juvenile Case Manager, as well as cover the salary and benefits of staff time spent administering Teen Court. The total approved budget of $97,900 includes travel and training funds for the Juvenile Case Manager that were recently approved by legislation. Police Seizure Fund $40,000 The Police Seizure Fund accounts for revenues and expenditures related to property seized by College Station Police Department. Expenditures for FY12 are budgeted at $40,000. These funds are used for one-time equipment and other purchases to assist in police activities. Memorial Cemetery Fund $0 This fund accounts for two thirds of cemetery lot sales as well as other revenue that is collected through the Memorial Cemetery and Aggie Field of Honor. The fund also accounts for expenditures on projects that take place at this location. No expenditures have been included in the FY12 approved budget for the Memorial Cemetery Fund. The maintenance and operations for this cemetery is budgeted in the General Fund in the Parks and Recreation Department. Memorial Cemetery Perpetual Care Fund $10,000 This fund accounts for the remaining one third of the sales of cemetery lots that are accrued through the Memorial Cemetery Fund, which includes the Aggie Field of Honor. FY12 expenditures include $10,000 for the continued marketing efforts of the new cemetery. Cemetery Perpetual Care Fund $0 This fund accounts for the sale of cemetery lots and other revenues that are collected through the College Station cemetery. The fund also accounts for expenditures on projects that take place in the cemetery. There are no expenditures anticipated in this fund in FY12. The maintenance and operations for this cemetery is budgeted in the General Fund in the Parks and Recreation Department. Internal Service Funds The City has established several internal service funds for areas where goods and services are provided to City departments on a cost-reimbursement basis. The Internal Service Funds include the Insurance Funds, the Equipment Replacement Fund, the Utility Customer Service Fund, and Fleet Maintenance Fund. Each of these funds receives revenues from City departments to which services are provided. Base budget revenues for the funds reflect the above policies. Internal Service funds have revenues transferred from departmental budgets on a monthly basis to ensure that funds are available for related expenses. Insurance Funds The City of College Station has four funds for insurance purposes, all of which are self-funded. 24 Property Casualty Fund $1,637,161 The Property Casualty Fund ensures that the City can adequately cover potential property and liability losses. The FY12 estimated revenues for the Property Casualty fund are $1,492,910. Approved expenditures total $1,637,161. Contributions to this fund have increased over prior years to offset prolonged legal expenses. Employee Benefits Fund $9,138,943 The Employee Benefits Fund is self-funded and provides medical coverage to covered City employees and dependents. Estimated revenues for the employee benefits fund total $9,003,244 for FY12, and budgeted expenditures total $9,138,943. Funds for wellness programs have been included in the budget in an effort to mitigate future estimated claims costs. In addition, expanded choices for coverage, including a high deductible plan, continued to be offered in an effort to offset rising health care costs. One approved service level adjustment, totaling $22,375, is included in the Benefits budget to provide Fit Life testing for police officers. Workers Compensation Fund $747,874 The Workers Compensation Fund provides coverage against losses sustained through on the job injuries to employees. Revenues anticipated in the Workers Compensation fund are $805,538; expenditures total $747,874. Funds in the amount of $22,500 are included to provide city workers with reimbursement for the purchase of safety boots. A one-time transfer in the amount of $200,000 will be made to help offset anticipated claims in the Unemployment Compensation Fund in FY12. The ending fund balance is anticipated to be sufficient to meet worker’s compensation needs. Unemployment Compensation Fund $260,600 Revenues in the Unemployment Compensation Fund are estimated to be $230,042. This includes a one-time transfer in from the Workers Compensation Fund to increase the fund balance. Expenditures in this fund are budgeted to be $260,600. Claims costs are anticipated to increase in FY12. Equipment Replacement Fund $4,084,826 The City has a fund that serves to accumulate resources for the replacement of vehicles and large motorized equipment, the telephone and radio systems, to provide replacement assets for the existing major technological infrastructure, and the replacement of copiers. Anticipated revenues for FY12 total $3,592,926; expenditures total $4,084,826. $3,933,000 is included for fleet replacement and new purchases. Funding is also included for replacement copiers, mobile data terminals, and uninterruptible power supplies. Utility Customer Service Fund $2,342,713 The Utility Customer Service Division is the primary interface with the City’s utility customers. Responsibilities include setting up customer accounts, connecting and disconnecting utility services, reading meters, billing and collecting utility customer accounts and addressing customer concerns. FY12 approved expenses are $2,342,713. There is one SLA included for Meter Services for the replacement of hand held meters in the division. The total cost of replacement is $23,661. The chart to the right illustrates the number of meters read annually over the last several years. Fleet Maintenance Fund $1,659,149 The Public Works Fleet Services Division manages the vehicle and equipment fleet. The division also performs preventive maintenance and vehicle repair. The City maintains a fleet of vehicles and heavy equipment to provide 640,554 670,913 694,270 708,672 717,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 est. Number of Meters Read Annually 25 services to the citizens of College Station. Some of these services include Police and Fire response, Solid Waste Collection, Public Utilities, Building Inspection, and Parks operations. In FY12, revenues in the Fleet Fund are projected to be $1,577,410. FY12 budgeted expenditures are $1,659,149. Capital Project Funds $37,349,793 The City has a number of capital project funds. General obligation bonds form the basic resource for general government projects such as streets, parks, traffic, public facilities and other such needs. However, the City has several other resources that may be used to supplement those resources and help to hold down the ad valorem taxes necessary to pay for general obligation bonds. In addition to the general government projects, the City has bond funds for each of the utilities operated by the City. For FY12, operating funds from both the Water and Wastewater Funds in the amount of $3,070,000 are projected to be used to fund capital projects in lieu of the issuance of additional debt. Other resources to fund capital projects include the Wolf Pen Creek Tax Increment Financing District, the Drainage Utility and Parkland Dedication Funds. Each provides resources that will be used to complete a number of projects over the next five years. General Government Capital Projects The following is a brief summary of some of the key general government projects included in the FY12 Approved Budget. More details of these projects can be found in the capital project summaries preceding each capital projects section in the budget document. The funds expended on these projects are considered significant and nonroutine. STREETS, TRAFFIC, SIDEWALKS AND TRAIL CAPITAL PROJECTS Street Rehabilitation Projects In FY12, funds in the amount of $145,384 are included for the Tauber and Stasney Rehabilitation project. These streets are located in the Northgate area. The project includes the rehabilitation of Tauber Street and Stasney Street from University Drive to Cherry Street as well as the design and construction of new sidewalks on College Main. The project also includes the water and wastewater line rehabilitation. The majority of the construction on these streets should be complete in FY11, but the FY12 estimate reflects remaining expenditures. Other rehabilitation projects estimated for FY12 include the Bird Pond Rehabilitation project. This project is for the rehabilitation of Bird Pond Road from the city limits to Rock Prairie Road. Funding for this project will come from the authorization related to the Barron Road Widening Phase II project. The Barron Road Widening Phase II project is under construction and is anticipated to come in well below the amount authorized through the GOB. An additional rehabilitation project included in the FY12 Approved Budget is the Cooner Street Rehabilitation project. This project includes the rehabilitation of paving and water and wastewater lines along Cooner Street. The project may include concrete pavement, curb, gutter, storm drainage and sidewalks. The majority of the funding for the Streets component of this project will be from Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. $1,075,634 of the $1,203,000 Streets budget will be funded with CDBG funds. The balance of the budget will come from Barron Road Widening Phase II authorization. Street Extension Projects $5,302,598 is the estimated expenditure included for various street extension and widening projects. Included in this is $572,611 for Oversize Participation (OP) projects that may arise throughout the fiscal year. These funds are used for building increased capacity into the streets that are being constructed by developers. Of this amount, $472,611 is from OP funds authorized as part of the 2003 GOB. An additional $100,000 of OP funds is budgeted and reflects assessments expected to be received as a result of the Holleman Extension project. It is estimated that $500,000 in assessments will be received over the next five years as the area adjacent to Holleman Drive develops. As a significant portion of the Holleman Extension project budget was funded using OP funds, the received assessments will be earmarked for future OP projects. These funds will not be available for expenditure until they are received. Other street extension projects include the extension of Victoria Avenue. It is estimated that $316,519 will be spent in FY12 to extend Victoria Avenue from Southern Plantation Drive to connect with William D. Fitch Parkway (SH40), aligning with the existing Victoria Avenue on the south side of William D. Fitch Parkway (SH40). The 26 roadway will be a major collector consisting of two travel lanes and a center turn lane with bike lanes, sidewalks, landscaping and storm drainage. Water and wastewater upgrades will also be made as part of this project. The project is being completed in advance of the new College Station ISD (CSISD) high school, which is expected to open in August of 2012. An estimated $575,692 is projected for the extension of Jones-Butler Drive. This project includes the design and construction of a major collector from the intersection of Luther Street & Jones-Butler to the intersection of George Bush & Penberthy Road. The project will also include sidewalks, bike lanes and an equestrian crossing. $500,000 is projected in FY12 for the design of the Health Science Center Parkway. This project is a component of the Bio-Medical Corridor agreement. The budget also includes an estimated FY12 expenditure of $931,684 for the Rock Prairie Road East Widening project. These funds will be used for design and right-of-way acquisition costs related to the future widening of Rock Prairie Road. Construction funds are not included in the project budget. $266,379 is the projected FY12 expenditure for the Rock Prairie Road West right-of-way project. This project includes the purchase of additional right-of-way from State Highway 6 to Normand Drive to provide for the future widening of that section of Rock Prairie Road. Funds have also been estimated for the design of the Rock Prairie Road Bridge Widening project. This project was added in late FY11. The City of College Station will design the bridge widening and TxDOT will construct the project. The bridge will be widened to six lanes with U-turn lanes constructed at the north and south ends of the existing bridge. The project will also include sidewalks and bike lanes or a multi-use path. In addition, acceleration/deceleration lanes will be added along the frontage roads. The design will be paid for by the City of College Station using the remaining unallocated Barron Road Widening Phase II authorization (2008 GOB). The construction will be paid for by TxDOT using Proposition 12 funds received from the State that must be used on bridges and overpasses. Design began late FY11 with construction estimated to begin in FY13. In addition, $1,125,429 is the estimated FY12 expenditure for the phase II of construction to Barron Road from Decatur Drive to William D. Fitch Parkway (SH40). This project will widen Barron Road from Decatur Drive to Barron Cutoff Road on the southwest side of William D. Fitch Parkway (SH40). The existing Barron Road is a two lane rural road. Upon completion of this project, Barron Road will be expanded to a divided four lane minor arterial roadway with medians, bicycle lanes and sidewalks. In addition, new traffic signals will be installed at the intersection of Barron Road and Victoria Avenue and at Barron Road and William D. Fitch Parkway (SH40). This project is anticipated to be completed in advance of the opening of the new CSISD high school in August of 2012. Finally, $710,000 is included for design work on the Barron Road East/Lakeway extension project. This project will extend Barron Road from State Highway 6 east at the existing Barron Road to a future intersection with the extension of Lakeway Drive. The Barron Road extension will be combined with the Lakeway Drive extension. Street TxDOT Projects Projected expenditures include $91,562 for the Wellborn Widening Reimbursement project. As part of an AFA with TxDOT, the City is required to reimburse 10% of the right-of-way costs associated with the Wellborn Widening project. The majority of the reimbursement was paid in prior years, but it is anticipated that a final payment will need to be made in FY12. Traffic Projects The FY12 Approved Budget includes an estimated $842,574 for traffic projects throughout the City. Funds are included for a new traffic signal at the intersection of Wellborn and F&B and a signal at the intersection of State Highway 30 and Copperfield. In addition, $65,000 is included for the design of a signal at FM 2818 and FM 60. $23,790 is included for traffic system safety improvement projects and $32,536 is included for traffic signal communication projects. These projects support traffic signal connectivity as well as other City data and voice services. Sidewalk and Trail Projects The City of College Station has worked over the years to ensure adequate transportation infrastructure is constructed for pedestrians and bicyclists. The City has an adopted Bicycle, Pedestrian and Greenways Master Plan. In FY12, $200,000 is included for sidewalk improvement projects throughout the City. The specific projects on which these funds will be used are in the process of being identified. $224,000 is estimated to be spent on Phase II of the Hike and Bike Trail Completion project. This project will continue the 10' wide multi-use trail from Welsh Avenue to the Campus Village trail to the west. The trail will also be extended from the northern connection of the Campus Village Trail through Southwest Park as part of the Southwest Park development, providing continuity of the hike & 27 bike trail system from Texas Avenue to Southwest Parkway. In addition, $508,000 is projected to be used toward the design of the Lick Creek Hike and Bike Trail. This project is for the construction of approximately three miles of hike and bike trails along Lick Creek between Westfield Park and Lick Creek Park. The trails will connect residential neighborhoods and CSISD property. An estimated $679,500 will be spent toward the design of Phase II of the University Drive Pedestrian Improvements project. This project consists of implementing the remaining phases (2 through 5) of the Pedestrian Improvements on University Drive. The project is designed to improve pedestrian travel in the Northgate area of College Station, especially to facilitate pedestrian movement across and along University Drive between Boyett Street and South College Avenue. Finally, funds in the amount of $637,000 are estimated for the construction of the College Main Plaza Improvements. This project is for the construction of a pedestrian plaza with bike lane from University Drive to Patricia Street. In addition, intersection improvements will be made along Lodge Street and Patricia Street. Funding for this project will come from several sources. A portion will come from the balance of the Discovery Drive project, which is complete and came in under budget. The balance of the budget will come from Certificates of Obligation (CO’s) issued in prior years for the Police Station Improvements project ($208,707) and the completion of the 2nd floor of the Municipal Court building ($18,376). Use of these funds is limited to certain types of projects, but they may be used for the College Main Plaza Improvements project. PARKS AND RECREATION CAPITAL PROJECTS In FY12, expenditures in the amount of $2,271,230 are estimated for Parks and Recreation capital improvement projects. Included is $68,384 for field redevelopment projects. A portion of the funds will be used for replacement and repairs to numerous athletic facilities and parks throughout the City. The funds for these projects are collected from the fees paid by players and teams from both City leagues and outside user groups. The funds are used to pay for replacement items and facility upgrades at City athletic facilities. $81,696 is the estimated expenditure for improvements at University Park. This project will consist of the addition of 14 parking spaces to the existing parking lot. Also included in the project is the addition of a landscape island, sidewalks, curb and gutter, and relocation of the irrigation system, as needed. Funds in the amount of $293,843 are estimated for the purchase of park land throughout the City as part of the Neighborhood Parks Revolving Fund project. These funds are used for acquiring properties for neighborhood parks in advance of development. $792,307 is included for improvements at Stephen C. Beachy Central Park. These include the construction of a new concession complex and restroom building. An estimated $100,000 is included for the Lick Creek Park Iron Bridge Trail Completion. This project is for the construction of a compacted gravel trail over the existing dirt trail in Lick Creek Park. $198,000 has been included for the design of the East District Maintenance Shop Replacement. These funds will be used to replace the existing shop. Finally, funds are included for the detailed design of the Lick Creek Nature Center. This center, proposed to be built at Lick Creek Park, will serve as a nature center for visitors who want to learn more about the park. GENERAL GOVERNMENT AND CAPITAL EQUIPMENT CAPITAL PROJECTS General government and capital equipment projects are planned assets that have value to more than one specific area of City operations. The two main divisions within this category are public facilities and technology projects. Estimated expenditures for public facility projects in FY12 include $6,349,265 for the construction of Fire Station #6. Fire Station #6 will serve the busy University Drive corridor. Construction is expected to be completed in FY12. In addition, $599,000 is included in the budget for the purchase and installation of a Fire Emergency Response Alerting System. This system will replace the fire station alerting system and the PA systems in stations 1, 2 and 4. A portion of the funding for this system will come from the balance of budget remaining from the Fire Station #3 Relocation project. Certificates of Obligation in the amount of $239,409 remain and may be used toward this project. The additional needed budget will come from the balance of the Radio System Replacement project, which is complete and came in under budget. The budget for the Radio System Replacement project was a combination of CO debt and Equipment Replacement Funds. Finally, $20,000 is included for the purchase of library books. The funds for the purchase of these books come from donations collected for this purpose. The FY12 Approved Budget also includes a projected expenditure of $832,000 for technology projects. Included is $300,000 for the replacement of the City’s Mobile Data Terminal system. This project is for the replacement of the electronic equipment that provides the interface between the radio frequency system (800 MHz radio system) and the Internet Protocol system (Computer Aided Dispatch). The goal of the project is to provide a public safety radio system that meets current and anticipated needs. $122,500 is projected for the Fiber Optic Infrastructure 28 project. This project will support the installation of fiber optic cable to continue expansion of the city's network to new buildings and facilities, and to permit the connection of existing facilities that are not currently on the network. An estimated $224,500 is included for the E-mail and File System Migration project. This project will migrate the city E-mail system from GroupWise to another e-mail system. The project will also implement a new e-mail archive system and will move file and print management. Finally, $185,000 has been included for a Network and Data Security Upgrade project. This project will examine city wide data security standards, policies and procedures and will result in establishing guidelines and business practices that will bring the city more closely in alignment with industry best practices for information security. These latter two projects, as well as $200,000 of the MDT System Replacement budget, will be funded using a portion of the balance of the Radio System Replacement project, which is complete and came in under budget. Finally, funds in the amount of $763,286 will be transferred to the Electric Fund. These funds reflect the balance of the Radio System Replacement project. In addition, as mentioned in the Sidewalks and Trails section of the Streets Capital overview, $227,083 will be transferred to the Streets Capital Improvement Projects Fund for use on the College Main Plaza Improvements project. UTILITY CAPITAL PROJECTS Below are descriptions of the utility capital projects included in the FY12 Approved Budget. The funds expended on these projects are considered significant and nonroutine. Electric Capital Projects $9,571,100 is the approved budgeted appropriation for electric capital projects in FY12. Funds in the amount of $3,000,000 are budgeted for Production projects in FY12. It is anticipated that these funds will be used for a methane gas production project at the Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency (BVSWMA) landfill. $650,000 is included for General Plant projects. These include the replacement of the mapping system, enhancements to the SCADA system and plant upgrades. Also included is $250,000 for the design of renovations to the Utility Service Center Building. Funds in the amount of $1,160,000 are estimated for Overhead System Improvement projects. These funds will be used for the construction of overhead feeder extensions and upgrades of existing overhead electric infrastructure. This includes the annual utility pole replacement program. Funds in the amount of $1,150,000 are estimated for Underground System Improvement projects. These funds will be used for the construction of new underground electric projects and for conversion of overhead power lines to underground. $1,380,000 is included in the approved budget for New Service and System Extension projects. These funds will be used to provide electrical system services for new customer additions (residential, commercial, apartments and subdivisions). $95,000 is included in the approved budget for Residential Street Lighting projects. These funds are used for new residential street lighting projects and improvement to existing residential street lighting. Funds in the amount of $150,000 are estimated for Thoroughfare Street Lighting projects. These funds will be used are for new thoroughfare street lighting projects and improvements to existing thoroughfare street lights. $759,000 is included in the approved budget for Distribution projects and $1,175,000 is included for Transmission projects. These funds will be used for the construction of electric transmission and distribution projects to provide electric capacity to the City of College Station. Major substation replacement equipment is included in this funding. The FY12 Approved Budget includes a projected debt issue of $8,825,000 for Electric Utility capital projects. Water Capital Projects In FY12, $8,456,117 is the approved new appropriation included for water capital projects. Appropriations from prior years carry forward on capital projects. In some cases, the total new appropriations exceed the total estimate for capital expenditures because the new appropriations may cover not only the current fiscal year, but future fiscal years as well. The new appropriations included for FY12 exceed the FY12 projected expenditures for this reason. Total expenditures in FY12 for Water capital projects are projected to be $8,033,942. Water Production projects include an estimated FY12 expenditure of $5,728,440. $800,000 is included for the purchase of land for future well sites. As capacity needs grow, the City is preparing for the construction of new wells. A component of this is the land acquisition for new future wells. An estimated $418,000 is included for the Sandy Point Chemical System Replacement project. The chemical feed and storage facilities at Sandy Point Pump Station require upgrading to accommodate current expansion of the water production infrastructure and to be in compliance with current fire codes. As part of the project, the existing chlorine disinfection system will be replaced to improve personnel safety, 29 operating reliability and cost efficiency. $3,116,645 is included for high service water pump improvements. This project will increase the pumping capacity of the Dowling Road Pump Station. This project is in response to analysis of the water system capacities in relation to Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) requirements. It is anticipated that these improvements will be completed in FY13. $625,000 is included in the approved budget for the Cooling Tower Expansion project. This project is for the design and construction of an additional water cooling tower and all of the associated appurtenances to connect this new equipment into the existing system. The additional tower is needed to meet the increased production capacity of the water system. $371,295 is included for the completion of the 3 Million Gallon Ground Storage Reservoir (MG GSR) Rehabilitation project. As part of this project, the interior coating of the reservoir will be replaced and some structural upgrades will be made to ensure that it meets TCEQ guidelines. In addition, $45,000 is included for the design of the same improvements at the 5 Million Gallon Ground Storage Reservoir (MG GSR). $37,500 is included for the design of renovations at the Utility Service Center. The cost of the renovations is being shared by the Electric, Water and Wastewater utilities as all three are housed in this facility. It is anticipated that the renovations will occur in future fiscal years. $25,000 is projected for the continuation of the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) man machine interface project. This project is for the evaluation, procurement and implementation of software packages available to improve the SCADA man machine interface or graphical software. New servers are included to increase flexibility and reduce vulnerabilities and down time. An additional $50,000 is included for Well #7 Fiber. This project is for the installation of fiber from Sandy Point pump station to Water Well #7 to create wireless access point for Water Wells #5, #6, #8 and future wells. Finally, $240,000 is included for the Water Redundant Communications project. This project is for data communication improvements. These improvements will allow for built-in redundancy, wireless co mmunications, mobile work force and unforeseen communication plans not related to construction projects. The main focus is to construct fiber loops which provide multiple paths to all facilities. Funds in the amount of $997,500 are projected to be expended on Water Distribution projects in FY12. This includes $100,000 of general Oversize Participation (OP) funds. These funds are used to help meet future capacity needs by oversizing water lines above the minimum size required to serve a development. $557,000 is the projected FY12 expenditure for the Wellborn Widening project. This project was for the relocation of water lines outside of pavement areas in conjunction with Wellborn Widening. This final phase should be completed in FY12. A portion of the expenditures for this project will be reimbursed by TxDOT. It is estimated that approximately $1,000,000 will be received in FY13 following the completion of the project. Approximately $2,400,000 was received in FY10 for a portion of the project that has already been completed. $108,500 is the estimated FY12 expenditure for the Raymond Stotzer West Water Line project. This project is for the design and construction of water infrastructure to provide service to an area that was annexed by the City of College Station in 1995. This area is near the intersection of Raymond Stotzer West and FM 2818. In addition, $137,000 is included for the City of Bryan Raymond Stotzer Phase I water line. This project will consist of the construction of a 12" waterline along Health Science Center Parkway from FM 47 to Turkey Creek Road, and for the construction of a 16" waterline along F&B Road from Turkey Creek Road to FM 2818. This project will be designed and constructed by the City of Bryan, but will be paid for by the City of College Station. This project is a component of the Bio-Medical Corridor agreement. Finally, $95,000 is estimated in FY12 for the construction of an 8-inch water distribution line to serve the necessary fire protection for the approved Carter Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (CCWWTP) Lab/SCADA building. Rehabilitation projects included in the FY12 Approved Budget include $634,150 for the South Knoll/The Glade project. This project is for the replacement of water lines in the area bounded by Haines, Southwest Parkway, Glade and Langford. These aging lines were identified in a 2003 water study as in need of replacement. In addition, $78,534 has been included for the completion of the Southwood 5-7 project. Construction on this project began in FY11 and should be completed in FY12. This project is for the replacement of water lines in an area bounded by Southwest Parkway, Harvey Mitchell Parkway, Welsh and Shadowood. Other rehabilitation projects include the Cooner Street Rehabilitation project and the Plantation Oaks Water Line Rehabilitation project. The Cooner Street Rehabilitation project includes the rehabilitation of water and wastewater lines and paving along Cooner Street from Texas Avenue to the street terminus. The water distribution lines are in need of replacement due to an increase in service disruptions caused by deteriorating lines. The FY12 estimate is for the design of the project. Funding for the majority of the cost of the project design will come from Community Development Block Grant funds. Construction of the water portion of the project, which will follow in FY13, will be paid for with water utility revenue. The Plantation Oaks Water Line Rehabilitation project is for the rehabilitation of a 12-inch water line along 30 Harvey Rd, between Scarlett O’Hara Drive and Munson Avenue. This segment of the line is being replaced due to continuing failures that are causing service disruptions to customers in this area. Contingency in the amount of $150,000 has been included in the FY12 Approved Budget. These funds will be available for use on unanticipated projects as well as to offset project overruns. Finally, $150,000 has been included for the meter replacement program that was implemented in FY08. This program is for the replacement of water meters on a routine basis to ensure efficient water readings. The FY12 Approved Budget includes an estimated $1,950,000 in current revenues that will be transferred from operations to fund water capital projects. Additionally, a debt issue of $6,100,000 is projected in FY12 for Water capital projects. Wastewater Capital Projects The FY12 Approved Budget includes $4,815,757 in new appropriations for numerous wastewater capital projects. Appropriations from prior years carry forward on capital projects. Therefore, the projected expenditures exceed the new appropriations included for FY12. Total expenditures in FY12 for Wastewater capital projects are projected to be $9,144,828. Wastewater Collection projects include $100,000 for oversize participation and planning. These funds are available to meet future anticipated capacity in the construction of wastewater lines above the minimum size needed to serve the development. An estimate of $325,000 is included for the East Side FM 158 Sewer Line project. This project will construct gravity sewer lines, lift station and forced main to serve properties along FM 158 south of the intersection with FM 30 in service territory acquired from the City of Bryan and within the City of Bryan's corporate limits. This project is the result of a service territory swap coordinated as part of the Bio-Medical Corridor agreement. Design of the line is estimated to begin in FY12 with construction following in FY13 and FY14. $44,965 has been estimated in FY12 for upgrades to the wastewater infrastructure that are being completed as part of the Victoria Avenue Extension project. In FY12, $934,758 is the estimated expenditure for the Scott and White Sewer Line/Lift Station project. This project consists of the design, construction, and land acquisition required for a new lift station facility (on the Scott & White property) and a force main along State Highway 6 that will connect to the Spring Creek trunk line. Funding for this project will come from the Economic Development Fund, from Scott and White and from wastewater utility revenue. Funding is also included in the FY12 approved budget for the design of the Bee Creek Parallel Trunkline. The existing Bee Creek Trunkline sub-basin currently serves areas along FM2818, from areas north of Wellborn Road to the Carters Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant. This project will install a gravity line to increase the system capacity of the Bee Creek Trunkline sub-basin to accept the ultimate build-out demand anticipated in this respective area. This project is expected to span several years with construction being completed in FY14. $225,000 is included in the approved budget for the design of the FM 2154 Sewer Trunkline. This project is for the design, easement acquisition and construction of a gravity sanitary sewer line along the east side of FM2154, a lift station in the proximity of the intersection of FM2154/Greens Prairie Trail and a force main along the south side of Greens Prairie Trail. This project is also expected to span several fiscal years, with completion estimated for FY15. Rehabilitation projects included in the FY12 Approved Budget include South Knoll/The Glade. This project is for the replacement of wastewater lines in the area bounded by Haines, Southwest Parkway, Glade and Langford. These aging lines were identified in a 2003 water study as in need of replacement. In addition, $136,331 has been included for the completion of the Southwood 5-7 project. Construction on this project began in FY11 and should be completed in FY12. This project is for the replacement of wastewater lines in an area bounded by Southwest Parkway, Harvey Mitchell Parkway, Welsh and Shadowood. Also included in the FY12 Approved Budget is the Cooner Street Rehabilitation project. The Cooner Street Rehabilitation project includes the rehabilitation of water and wastewater lines and paving along Cooner Street. The sanitary sewer lines are in need of replacement due to an increase in service disruptions caused by deteriorating lines. The FY12 estimate is for the design of the project. Funding for the majority of the cost of the project design will come from Community Development Block Grant funds. Construction of the wastewater portion of the project, which will follow in FY13, will be paid for with wastewater utility revenue. Finally, funds in the amount of $309,029 are included in the approved budget for the Northeast Trunkline Rehabilitation. A study conducted in 2010 identified major defects within the Northeast Trunkline. The intent of this project is to repair/replace the most critical segments of this interceptor. Funds in the amount of $3,271,047 have been estimated for Treatment and Disposal projects. $924,509 is included for the Carter Creek Headworks Improvements project. This project will replace or refurbish components of the 31 existing headworks that have become unserviceable. $167,000 is the projected expenditure for the construction of catwalks around the Lick Creek clarifiers. The catwalks will provide safe access for the operators to operate and maintain the clarifiers. An estimated $155,000 is included for centrifuge improvements at the Lick Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (LCWWTP). Improvements include installing a larger sludge discharge hopper, a sludge conveyor and a work platform around the centrifuge. $156,100 is included for completion of the Lick Creek Sludge Holding Tank Improvements. This project will ultimately expand the size of the waste sludge holding tank at the Lick Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant. An additional $168,438 is estimated for the completion of the Lick Creek Return Activated Sludge Modifications project. The Return Activated Sludge Pumps are not consistently pumping return activated sludge at an appropriate rate. This is a critical function essential to meeting TCEQ mandated treatment requirements. This project will reconfigure the sludge piping so that the pumps will perform acceptably. $200,000 is included for the Lick Creek Sludge Blower Replacement project. This project will replace the current blower units which are at the end of their service life. New blowers are needed to maintain quality of sludge during storage prior to dewatering. $850,000 is included for the Lick Creek Centrifuge Replacement project. This project will replace the sludge dewatering centrifuge at the LCWWTP. The current centrifuge has exceeded its useful life. An estimated $650,000 is included for the Carter Creek Digested Sludge Aerator Replacement project. This project will replace the current aeration diffusers in Digested Sludge Holding Tanks #1 and #2 at the CCWWTP. Continued failures of the existing diffusers make replacement essential. Funds in the amount of $34,768 are estimated for the SCADA replacement project. This project will replace the control equipment that has exceeded its useful life. $592,808 is the projected expenditure for the completion of the Carters Creek Lab and SCADA Building project. The existing building no longer meets laboratory standards. In addition, $99,006 is estimated for Process Control Improvements at LCWWTP. This project will be for the purchase and installation of improved process control instrumentation at the Plant. An additional $117,259 has been included in FY12 for the installation of SCADA at the new lift stations. This will allow for monitoring and alarming of the new lift stations. $120,000 is included for the Carter Creek Fiber Ring project. This project will provide for data communication improvements that will allow for built-in redundancy, wireless communications, mobile work force, and unforeseen communication plans not related to construction projects. The main focus is to construct fiber loops which provide multiple paths to all facilities. $37,500 is included for the design of renovations at the Utility Service Center. The cost of the renovations is being shared by the Electric, Water and Wastewater utilities as all three are housed in the facility. It is anticipated that the renovations will occur in future fiscal years. Finally, $111,172 is included for the Aggie Acres Fiber Optic Conduit project. This project will connect the Aggie Acres lift station in the ETJ to the City's sewer system. Finally, contingency in the amount of $150,000 has been included in the FY12 Approved Budget. These funds will be available for use on unanticipated projects as well as to offset project overruns. A total of $1,120,000 in current revenues from operations is estimated to be used to fund Wastewater capital projects. Additionally, a debt issue of $7,580,000 is projected in FY12 for wastewater capital projects. SPECIAL REVENUE CAPITAL PROJECTS Below are descriptions of the special revenue capital projects included in the FY12 Approved Budget. The funds expended on these projects are considered significant and nonroutine. Park Land Dedication Capital Improvement Projects The Park Land Dedication Funds account for the receipt and expenditure of funds received by the City from residential land developers who dedicate land, or money in lieu of land, for use in the development of neighborhood parks in residential areas. The projects in the Park Land Dedication Capital Improvement Projects Funds are funded using the dedicated park land funds. Park Land dedication funds must be used for the development of parks within the zone to which the funds are dedicated. In FY12, expenditures for Park Land Dedication projects are estimated at $1,420,175 for projects that are anticipated to be completed in the various park zones. Funds in the amount of $4,895 are included for improvements at University Park. These improvements will include additional parking and a retaining wall at the large dog pond. The Park Land Dedication funds for this project will be supplemented with Neighborhood Park Improvement bond funds. An estimated $36,000 is included for improvements at Carter Crossing Park. The park will be constructed in phases as funds become available and is planned to ultimately include sidewalks, an entry 32 plaza, a tot playground, creek crossings, benches and trees with irrigation. $208,280 is the FY12 estimated expenditure for improvements at Southwest Park. This phase of the project will be the construction of a 10 foot wide hike and bike trail through Southwest Park. The trail will connect with the north end of the Campus Village Trail and will continue to Southwest Parkway. The project will include a bridge crossing, retaining wall, and box culverts. The project will be designed in-house by Public Works staff. It is estimated that $10,000 will be spent in FY12 for phase III of John Crompton Park. The total project budget for this phase is $149,000. The FY12 expenditure reflects the estimate of what is needed to complete this phase of the project. Additional funds are projected in a number of Park Land zones but these funds have not yet been obligated to specific projects. These funds are available to be used for projects that arise throughout the year within the applicable zones. Funds not used in the fiscal year will carry over to future fiscal years. Drainage Capital Improvement Projects Drainage capital projects are funded by revenue generated through a drainage utility fee that is collected from residential and commercial utility users. Significant projects include a projected $355,000 for Greenways land acquisition throughout the City. The City’s Greenways Master Plan calls for future trail development in urban and suburban greenways. The funds for this project were from prior years’ debt issue. $200,000 is included for Minor Drainage Improvement projects. These funds are used for minor unscheduled drainage projects that arise throughout the fiscal year. $286,000 is included for Erosion Control in the Wolf Pen Creek trail area. Bank stabilization measures will be designed and constructed to protect the trails, irrigation, benches and other improvements in the upper trails area from erosion. An estimated $50,070 is included for Stormwater Mapping projects. These funds will be used for mapping of the City’s stormwater infrastructure. Finally, $500,000 is included for the completion of a Drainage Master Plan. The results of the study will be an inventory of existing infrastructure and a twenty (20) year maintenance and infrastructure improvement plan for those portions of the drainage basins that lie within the city limits. The plan will form the foundation for future infrastructure projects. Wolf Pen Creek TIF Capital Projects The Wolf Pen Creek (WPC) TIF Fund accounts for ad valorem tax and other revenues that are accrued to the WPC TIF District. The fund also accounts for expenditures on projects that take place in the district. The TIF expired on December 31, 2009. A balance of approximately $3.2 million remains in the WPC TIF Fund. A determination will be made in FY12 as to how the remaining balance will be spent. ADDITIONAL O&M COSTS The FY12 Approved Budget includes a number of capital projects that have been recently completed and have added operations and maintenance (O&M) expense. In particular, the City’s General Fund has been and will continue to be impacted by capital projects as they come online. In some situations, the O&M cost of a project is minimal and can be absorbed by the City department that is benefiting the most from the project. In other situations, the O&M cost is more significant and funding for these additional expenses is addressed through the Service Level Adjustment (SLA) process. In these situations, SLAs are submitted for the O&M needs of the capital projects and funding is considered as part of the budget process. Departments are expected to consider the impact of current and planned capital improvement projects on operations and maintenance (O&M) budgets. This analysis is a component of the 5-year Strategic Business Plans that are completed by all City departments. Projections as to the impact of capital projects on O&M budgets that are included in the Strategic Business Plans are used by the Finance Office in financial forecasting. Conclusion The previous discussion provided an overview of the FY12 budget and key changes from the FY11 budget. The following sections of the budget document provide additional discussion of the approved budget by fund. 33 City of College Station Fiscal Year Comparison Summary FY12 Approved FY12 Approved Net Operating % Change Fiscal Year 2011-2012 Total Funds Total Appropriation Transfers and Capital from Prior Approved Budget Available of Funds in Budget Fiscal Year General Fund 64,170,592$ 60,567,249$ (5,668,355)$ 54,898,894$ 0.52% Debt Service Fund 16,861,615 12,649,002 - 12,649,002 0.53% Economic Development Fund 1,061,818 728,454 (728,454) - N/A Parks Xtra Education Fund - - - - N/A Recreation Fund 1,198,016 3,811,342 (2,613,326) 1,198,016 194.11% Municipal Court Funds 1,116,423 296,820 - 296,820 -4.38% Police Seizure Fund 82,278 40,000 - 40,000 91.87% Utility Funds 132,359,370 122,670,715 - 122,670,715 0.14% Sanitation Fund 9,189,929 7,430,014 - 7,430,014 5.92% Parking Enterprise Fund 1,469,188 1,085,775 - 1,085,775 -37.91% BVSWMA Fund 1,393,401 1,393,401 1,393,401 -4.39% Hotel Tax Fund 8,233,195 2,123,142 - 2,123,142 -3.51% Community Development Fund 6,521,698 3,667,138 - 3,667,138 3.04% Traffic Safety Fund 72,959 72,959 - 72,959 21.60% Insurance Funds 16,579,857 11,784,578 (11,784,578) - N/A Utility Customer Service Fund 2,475,366 2,342,713 (2,342,713) - N/A Internal Services Funds 11,799,461 5,743,975 (5,743,975) - N/A Drainage Fund 2,690,722 1,367,058 - 1,367,058 7.63% Business Park Fund 112,150 112,150 - 112,150 -55.14% Chimney Hill Fund 2,291,054 125,000 - 125,000 N/A Cemetery Perpetual Care Fund 1,733,982 - - - N/A Memorial Cemetery Perpetual Care Fund 505,785 10,000 - 10,000 0.00% Memorial Cemetery Fund 1,254,713 - - - N/A ARRA of 2009 Fund 66,999 65,000 - 65,000 0.00% Subtotal of Operations & Maintenance 283,240,571$ 238,086,485$ (28,881,401)$ 209,205,084$ 0.47% Utility Funds Transfer to CIP 3,070,000 3,070,000 - 3,070,000 -49.47% Community Development Transfer to CIP 275,000 275,000 - 275,000 N/A Hotel Tax Fund Transfer to CIP - - - - N/A Capital Transfers to CIP 3,345,000$ 3,345,000$ -$ 3,345,000$ -44.94% General Government Capital Imp. Proj.27,735,901$ 10,862,214$ (155,000)$ 10,707,214$ 9.79% Utility Capital Improvement Projects 27,064,909 23,071,562 (3,190,000) 19,881,562 323.04% Community Development Capital Imp Proj.1,070,634 1,070,634 - 1,070,634 90.67% Special Revenue Capital Imp. Proj.3,444,428 2,345,383 - 2,345,383 111.10% Wolf Pen Creek TIF Capital Imp. Proj.3,240,548 - - - -100.00% Subtotal of Capital Expenditures 62,556,420$ 37,349,793$ (3,345,000)$ 34,004,793$ 77.50% Totals 349,141,991$ 278,781,278$ (32,226,401)$ 246,554,877$ 5.61% FY11 Approved FY11 Approved Net Operating % Change Fiscal Year 2010-2011 Total Funds Total Appropriation Transfers and Capital from Prior Approved Budget Available of Funds in Budget Fiscal Year General Fund 63,374,363$ 60,687,507$ (6,070,440)$ 54,617,067$ 1.10% Debt Service Fund 17,932,018 12,581,958 - 12,581,958 2.94% Economic Development Fund 1,853,604 658,825 (658,825) - N/A Parks Xtra Education Fund 118,898 114,769 - 114,769 2.01% Recreation Fund 407,335 935,459 (528,124) 407,335 N/A Municipal Court Funds 1,041,948 310,426 - 310,426 -7.66% Police Seizure Fund 88,690 20,847 - 20,847 0.25% Utility Funds 131,326,847 122,498,153 - 122,498,153 6.73% Sanitation Fund 8,655,550 7,014,768 - 7,014,768 3.52% Parking Enterprise Fund 1,952,617 1,748,592 - 1,748,592 8.03% BVSWMA Fund 1,457,339 1,457,339 1,457,339 -73.97% Hotel Tax Fund 7,016,217 2,200,335 - 2,200,335 -50.63% Community Development Fund 4,629,365 3,558,960 - 3,558,960 23.84% Traffic Safety Fund 161,924 60,000 - 60,000 -96.82% Insurance Funds 15,362,264 11,392,989 (11,392,989) - N/A Utility Customer Service Fund 2,435,404 2,258,503 (2,258,503) - N/A Internal Services Funds 12,528,883 6,823,868 (6,779,452) 44,416 N/A Drainage Fund 3,652,598 1,270,182 - 1,270,182 2.96% Business Park Fund 371,613 250,000 - 250,000 0.00% Chimney Hill Fund - - - - N/A Cemetery Perpetual Care Fund 1,735,694 - - - N/A Memorial Cemetery Perpetual Care Fund 441,775 10,000 - 10,000 -86.67% Memorial Cemetery Fund 1,137,490 2,764 - 2,764 N/A ARRA of 2009 Fund 73,369 65,000 - 65,000 189.71% Subtotal of Operations & Maintenance 277,755,805$ 235,921,244$ (27,688,333)$ 208,232,911$ 0.94% Utility Funds Transfer to CIP 6,075,000 6,075,000 - 6,075,000 -37.37% Community Development Transfer to CIP - - - - N/A Hotel Tax Fund Transfer to CIP - - - - N/A Capital Transfers to CIP 6,075,000$ 6,075,000$ -$ 6,075,000$ -37.37% General Government Capital Imp. Proj. 37,972,658$ 9,752,561$ -$ 9,752,561$ -48.52% Utility Capital Improvement Projects 24,189,330 10,774,639 (6,075,000) 4,699,639 -72.45% Community Development Capital Imp Proj. 561,500 561,500 - 561,500 N/A Special Revenue Capital Imp. Proj. 3,562,596 1,111,013 - 1,111,013 -31.04% Wolf Pen Creek TIF Capital Imp. Proj. 3,331,634 3,033,313 - 3,033,313 -10.78% Subtotal of Capital Expenditures 69,617,718$ 25,233,026$ (6,075,000)$ 19,158,026$ -55.97% Totals 353,448,523$ 267,229,270$ (33,763,333)$ 233,465,937$ -10.03% 11/4/2011 16:20 34 General Fund 22.27% Debt Service Fund 5.13% Recreation Fund 0.49% Other Governmental Funds 0.10% Hotel Tax Fund 0.86% Community Development Fund 1.49%Other Special Revenue Funds 0.75% Utility Funds 49.75% Sanitation Fund 3.01% Parking Enterprise Fund 0.44% BVSWMA Fund 0.57% Internal Services 0.00% Memorial Cemetery Perpetual Care Fund 0.00% Utility Funds Transfer to CIP 1.36% General Government CIP 4.34% Utilities CIP 8.06% Other CIP 1.39% City of College Station Net Budget -$246,554,877 35 2011‐2012 Approved Annual Budget Combined Summary of Revenues & Expenditures With Comparisons to 2010‐11 Budget Governmental Funds Enterprise Funds General Fund Debt Service (1) Other (2) Utilities Sanitation Parking Enterprise Hotel Tax Community Development Recreation Fund ARRA of 2009 Traffic Safety Fund (3) Court Funds Police Seizure Parkland Dedication BEGINNING BALANCE 9,909,630$ 4,569,410$ 2,794,102$ 8,250,733$ 1,947,506$ 309,499$ 4,832,515$ 2,477,060$ -$ 1,749$ 71,559$ 777,152$ 61,753$ 1,587,848$ REVENUES: Ad Valorem Tax 13,627,371 11,623,526 - - - Sales Tax 20,350,000 - - - Other Taxes 2,422,300 - - 3,372,680 - Licenses & Permits 968,866 - - - Intergovernmental 241,305 - - 5,390,272 65,250 - Charges for Services 2,759,510 - 123,525,851 7,229,423 999,394 1,198,016 - Fines, Forfeits & Penalties 3,401,529 7,750 - 144,949 286,000 20,000 Investment Earnings 67,016 45,000 26,212 217,500 12,000 11,346 28,000 1,400 4,189 525 5,000 Other 362,795 1,817,291 3,355,286 1,000 4,000 - 300,000 Return on Investment 10,060,270 - - - Transfers In 623,679 262,150 80,000 - Long Term Debt Issuance - - - Total Revenues 54,260,962$ 12,292,205$ 2,113,403$ 127,178,637$ 7,242,423$ 1,159,689$ 3,400,680$ 5,390,272$ 1,198,016$ 65,250$ 1,400$ 290,189$ 20,525$ 305,000$ TOTAL AVAILABLE RESOURCES 64,170,592 16,861,615 4,907,505 135,429,370 9,189,929 1,469,188 8,233,195 7,867,332 1,198,016 66,999 72,959 1,067,341 82,278 1,892,848 EXPENDITURES: General Government 3,674,203 - - - Fiscal Services 3,054,633 - - - Police 14,974,044 - - - Fire 13,555,824 - - - Planning & Development Services 3,761,302 - - - Public Works 6,823,880 - - - Parks & Recreation 5,044,666 - - 3,640,283 - Information Services 3,975,499 - - - Library 1,071,654 - - - Utilities - 94,275,494 - CIP Department - - - Projects/Direct Capital - 575,735 - Sanitation - - 5,962,610 - Parking Enterprise - - 749,230 - BVSWMA 1,393,401 - - Community Development - - 2,877,123 - Outside Agency Funding 932,563 - - 50,240 1,303,000 121,795 - Debt Service 12,629,002 - 13,758,325 464,000 224,444 - Return on Investment - 9,350,283 709,987 - Contingency 271,098 - 150,000 80,000 1,649 50,000 - Internal Services Special Revenue Funds Internal Services - - - Self-Insurance - - - Other/Other Transfers 2,753,575 20,000 965,604 1,918,849 152,077 (220,633) 219,000 (2,613,326) 65,000 72,959 296,820 40,000 (26,373) General & Administrative Transfers (4,994,047) - 2,642,029 475,100 91,529 326,698 121,808 171,059 - 26,373 CIP Expenditures Less G&A Xfers*- - 1,617,046 - 1,223,373 Transfers to CIP Funds - 3,070,000 275,000 - Total Expenditures 54,898,894$ 12,649,002$ 2,359,005$ 125,740,715$ 7,430,014$ 1,085,775$ 2,123,142$ 5,012,772$ 1,198,016$ 65,000$ 72,959$ 296,820$ 40,000$ 1,223,373$ Change in Fund Balance (637,932) (356,797) (245,602) 1,437,922 (187,591) 73,914 1,277,538 377,500 - 250 (71,559) (6,631) (19,475) (918,373) ENDING FUND BALANCE 9,271,698$ 4,212,613$ 2,548,500$ 9,688,655$ 1,759,915$ 383,413$ 6,110,053$ 2,854,560$ -$ 1,999$ -$ 770,521$ 42,278$ 669,475$ (1) Other Governmental Funds comprised of the BVSWMA, Economic Development, Business Park, Chimney Hill, and Efficiency Time Payment Funds. (2) Utilities comprised of the Electric, Water and Wastewater Funds (3) Court Funds comprised of Court Technology, Court Security and Juvenile Case Manager Funds (4) Governmental Capital Funds comprised of Streets, Parks, Facilities & Technology Funds (5) Internal Services Funds comprised of Fleet Maintenance, Utility Customer Service, and Equipment Replacement (6) Self-Insurance Funds comprised of Workers Compensation, Employee Benefits, Property Casualty and Unemployment Funds *Total CIP expenditures reflected does not include General and Administative transfers. General and Administrative transfers are reflected on a separate line. 36 FY 2011-2012 FY 2010-2011 FY 2009-2010 Capital Projects Funds Internal Services Funds Total Less Transfers Net Total Adopted Amended Actual Memorial Cemetery Drainage Wolf Pen Creek TIF Cemetery Perpetual Mem Cemetery Endowment (4) Governmental Funds (2) Utility Funds (5) Internal Services (6) Self Insurance All Funds All Funds 2011-2012 2010-2011 2010-2011 2009-2010 1,022,420$ 2,244,529$ 3,230,548$ 1,710,982$ 391,834$ 18,661,770$ 1,358,909$ 6,761,378$ 5,048,123$ 78,021,009$ (11,809,501)$ 66,211,508$ -$ 275,383,701$ - - - - 25,250,897 - 25,250,897 24,511,840 24,511,840 24,523,183 - - - - 20,350,000 - 20,350,000 19,077,164 19,077,164 19,328,577 - - - - 5,794,980 - 5,794,980 5,914,000 5,914,000 6,050,043 - - - - 968,866 - 968,866 843,285 843,285 964,344 555,000 - - - 6,251,827 - 6,251,827 4,492,285 4,683,307 5,078,273 1,976,200 81,600 - 195,000 - 137,964,994 - 137,964,994 134,827,807 135,003,949 134,309,622 - - - - 3,860,228 - 3,860,228 3,898,704 3,898,704 4,500,447 5,000 8,100 10,000 8,000 2,000 65,000 26,000 43,950 25,255 611,493 - 611,493 1,233,943 1,233,543 716,447 227,293 13,473 15,000 111,951 - - 75,000 1,646,644 7,929,733 - 7,929,733 7,276,092 7,133,350 4,104,808 - - - - 10,060,270 - 10,060,270 11,979,347 11,979,347 12,254,762 227,083 3,190,000 7,199,099 9,859,835 21,441,846 (21,441,846) - 24,216,543 25,750,388 20,665,290 8,145,000 22,505,000 - - 30,650,000 - 30,650,000 23,745,000 24,745,000 20,740,736 232,293$ 1,997,773$ 10,000$ 23,000$ 113,951$ 9,073,683$ 25,721,000$ 7,513,049$ 11,531,734$ 271,135,134$ (21,441,846)$ 249,693,288$ 262,016,010$ 264,773,877$ 253,236,532$ 1,254,713 4,242,302 3,240,548 1,733,982 505,785 27,735,453 27,079,909 14,274,427 16,579,857 349,156,143 (33,251,347) 315,904,796 262,016,010 264,773,877 528,620,233 - - - - - - 3,674,203 - 3,674,203 4,264,204 4,408,362 4,098,364 - - - - 3,054,633 - 3,054,633 3,113,654 3,113,654 3,086,275 - - - - 14,974,044 - 14,974,044 14,626,374 14,742,851 13,724,355 - - - - 13,555,824 - 13,555,824 11,899,890 12,043,131 11,414,188 - - - - 3,761,302 - 3,761,302 3,513,042 3,513,042 2,456,322 - - - - 6,823,880 - 6,823,880 6,821,413 6,913,690 6,099,189 - - - - 8,684,949 - 8,684,949 9,284,486 9,099,992 8,295,138 - - - - 3,975,499 - 3,975,499 3,946,682 4,012,060 3,886,102 - - - - 1,071,654 - 1,071,654 1,049,801 1,059,173 1,080,030 - - - - 94,275,494 - 94,275,494 92,388,636 95,246,900 103,053,825 - - - - - - - 911,632 911,632 129,005 - - - - 575,735 - 575,735 670,660 713,255 5,904,740 - - - - 5,962,610 - 5,962,610 5,617,694 5,617,694 6,081,577 - - - - 749,230 - 749,230 785,504 1,147,980 790,085 - - - - 1,393,401 - 1,393,401 1,442,276 1,442,276 4,532,799 - - - - 2,877,123 - 2,877,123 3,292,340 3,292,340 3,062,903 - - - - 2,407,598 - 2,407,598 1,951,276 1,951,276 - - - - - 27,075,771 - 27,075,771 27,351,496 27,351,496 18,897,184 - - - - 10,060,270 - 10,060,270 11,978,499 11,978,499 12,254,762 - - - - 552,747 - 552,747 806,598 820,378 - 8 086 688 8 086 688 (8 086 688)9 082 371 9 250 020 9 269 947- - 8,086,688 - 8,086,688 (8,086,688) - 9,082,371 9,250,020 9,269,947 - - - 11,722,203 11,722,203 (11,722,203) - 11,352,989 11,352,989 10,335,903 696,934 10,000 (501,071) (160,688) - - 3,688,727 (790,829) 2,897,898 3,457,088 7,032,305 (25,282,731) 415,317 501,071 160,688 - 62,375 - - - - - 1,376,817 10,862,214 23,071,562 - - 38,151,012 (3,345,000) 34,806,012 24,947,101 30,092,101 27,821,126 - - - - 3,345,000 - 3,345,000 6,075,000 6,075,000 - -$ 2,489,068$ -$ -$ 10,000$ 10,862,214$ 23,071,562$ 8,086,688$ 11,784,578$ 270,499,597$ (23,944,720)$ 246,554,877$ 260,630,706$ 273,182,096$ 230,991,088$ 232,293 (491,295) 10,000 23,000 103,951 (1,788,531) 2,649,438 (573,639) (252,844) 635,537 2,502,874 3,138,411 1,385,304 (8,408,219) 22,245,444 1,254,713$ 1,753,234$ 3,240,548$ 1,733,982$ 495,785$ 16,873,239$ 4,008,347$ 6,187,739$ 4,795,279$ 78,656,546$ (9,306,627)$ 69,349,919$ 1,385,304$ (8,408,219)$ 297,629,145$ Total Revenues 219,043,288$ -$ 219,043,288$ Transfers In 21,441,846 (21,441,846) - Long Term Debt Issuance 30,650,000 - 30,650,000 Decrease in Fund Balance (635,537) (2,502,874) (3,138,411) Total Appropriations 270,499,597$ (23,944,720)$ 246,554,877$ 37 City of College Station All Funds Operations & Maintenance Summary EXPENDITURE BY FUND Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FUND FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 General Fund 56,612,853 56,082,928 55,007,530 53,805,869 55,935,705 -0.26% Court Security Fund 118,807 118,298 122,701 65,040 65,040 -45.02% Juvenile Case Mgr Fund 80,084 91,566 82,055 97,900 97,900 6.92% Recreation Fund - 3,935,961 4,024,856 3,978,090 3,811,342 -3.17% ARRA Fund 617,108 443,488 389,180 65,000 65,000 -85.34% Traffic Safety Fund 358,008 80,540 80,540 72,959 72,959 -9.41% Community Development 271,797 319,740 319,740 293,263 288,263 -9.84% Parking Enterprise Fund 619,033 1,147,980 1,039,724 448,596 528,596 -53.95% Electric Fund 81,151,646 83,449,285 85,565,298 84,723,170 84,937,170 1.78% Water Fund 3,981,406 4,518,557 4,404,378 4,573,356 4,527,876 0.21% Wastewater Fund 5,155,696 5,207,057 5,172,557 5,254,183 5,386,183 3.44% Sanitation Fund 5,363,758 5,617,694 5,635,203 5,962,610 5,962,610 6.14% Property Casualty 96,155 120,353 127,362 91,161 91,161 -24.26% Employee Benefits 71,238 71,841 74,340 74,808 74,808 4.13% Workers Comp 127,070 151,553 149,858 114,185 114,185 -24.66% Utility Customer Service Fund 2,114,091 2,260,593 2,290,925 2,319,052 2,342,713 3.63% Fleet Fund 1,589,074 1,665,548 1,695,726 1,638,940 1,638,940 -1.60% Drainage Fund - - - 1,016,013 1,016,013 N/A BVSWMA Fund - 1,442,276 1,442,276 1,380,635 1,380,635 -4.27% COMBINED FUND TOTAL 158,327,824$ 166,725,258 167,624,249 165,974,830$ 168,337,099$ 0.97% EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from CLASSIFICATION FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Salaries & Benefits 55,974,904$ 59,231,327 58,384,030 59,104,245$ 60,148,359$ 1.55% Supplies 5,650,004 5,730,850 5,631,887 5,607,697 6,024,511 5.12% Maintenance 4,498,887 5,058,190 4,954,827 5,113,710 5,149,810 1.81% Purchased Services 17,732,299 19,387,396 19,003,085 18,995,900 19,666,441 1.44% Capital Outlay 776,409 1,933,623 2,050,420 701,785 896,485 -53.64% Purchased Power 73,695,321 75,383,872 77,600,000 76,451,493 76,451,493 1.42% COMBINED FUND TOTAL 158,327,824$ 166,725,258$ 167,624,249$ 165,974,830$ 168,337,099$ 0.97% PERSONNEL SUMMARY BY FUND Revised Approved Approved % Change in Actual Actual Budget Base Budget Budget Budget from FUND FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 General Fund 652.75 664.75 611.55 577.80 587.80 -3.88% Court Security Fund 2.50 2.50 2.00 1.00 1.00 -50.00% Juvenile Case Mgr Fund 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 0.00% Recreation Fund - - 51.70 50.70 49.70 -3.87% ARRA Fund - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00% Traffic Safety Fund 1.00 1.00 - - - 0.00% Community Development Fund 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 0.00% Parking Enterprise Fund 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 0.00% Electric Fund 68.50 68.50 68.50 67.50 67.50 -1.46% Water Fund 29.00 29.00 29.50 28.00 28.00 -5.08% Wastewater Fund 49.00 49.00 50.00 49.00 49.00 -2.00% Sanitation Fund 35.25 35.25 35.50 35.50 35.50 0.00% Property Casualty 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.00 1.00 -33.33% Employee Benefits 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00% Workers Comp 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.00 1.00 -33.33% Utility Customer Service Fund 29.50 29.50 28.50 28.50 28.50 0.00% Fleet Fund 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 0.00% Communications Fund 7.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Drainage Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.00 14.00 0.00% BVSWMA Fund 27.25 27.25 24.00 22.00 22.00 -8.33% COMBINED FUND TOTAL 935.00 941.00 935.50 907.25 916.25 -2.06% 38 Analysis of Tax Rate Fiscal Year 2011‐2012 Approved Approved FY 11 FY 12 Assessed Valuation of Real and Exempt Property $6,325,818,517 $6,645,750,780 (Based on 100% of Market Value) Less: Exempt Property $682,997,015 $710,703,184 Less: Agricultural Loss $99,032,310 $108,313,840 Less: Over 65 and Veterans Exemptions $73,949,425 $79,342,785 Less: House Bill 366 $141,432 $167,256 Less: Abatements $7,918,958 $0 Less: Proration $394,577 $236,525 Less: CHODO $0 $127,100 Less: Freeport $5,952,339 $8,245,088 Taxable Assessed Value $5,455,432,461 $5,738,615,002 Freeze Taxable $370,846,447 $404,589,120 Freeze Adjusted Taxable $5,084,586,014 $5,334,025,882 O&M and Debt Service Portion $5,455,432,461 $5,738,615,002 TIF Captured Value $0 $0 Total $5,455,432,461 $5,738,615,002 Apply Tax Rate per/$100 Valuation 0.447543/$100 0.437995/$100 Freeze Actual Tax $1,549,131 $1,680,416 Amount lost to Tax Freeze $80,368 $91,664 Total Tax Levy $24,304,840 $25,043,183 Estimate 100% Collection $24,304,840 $25,043,183 Tax Rate Per Percent Estimated $100 Valuation Of Levy Collections Debt Service 0.201536 46.0%$11,523,198 Estimate General Fund 0.236459 54.0%$13,519,985 Estimate Approved Tax Rate 0.437995 100%$25,043,183 Estimate 39 Analysis of Property ValuationsAnalysis of Property Valuationsypy Appraisal Total Market Exempt Total Taxableppp Y Vl ti Vl Vl *Year Valuation Value Value * 2002 3 151 961 166 428 395 713 2 723 565 45320023,151,961,166 428,395,713 2,723,565,453 2003 3 522 272 128 493 364 734 3 028 907 39420033,522,272,128 493,364,734 3,028,907,394 2004 3 847 854 578 556 723 136 3 291 131 44220043,847,854,578 556,723,136 3,291,131,442 2005 4 260 094 126 614 609 545 3 645 484 58120054,260,094,126 614,609,545 3,645,484,581 2006 4,698,557,824 643,387,278 4,055,170,54620064,698,557,824 643,387,278 4,055,170,546 2007 5,223,363,290 677,645,842 4,545,717,448,,,,,,,, 2008 5 726 153 143 701 998 930 5 024 154 21320085,726,153,143 701,998,930 5,024,154,213 2009 6 235 564 687 844 182 607 5 391 382 08020096,235,564,687 844,182,607 5,391,382,080 2010 6 325 818 517 870 386 056 5 455 432 46120106,325,818,517 870,386,056 5,455,432,461 2011 6 537 436 940 798 821 938 5 738 615 00220116,537,436,940 798,821,938 5,738,615,002 City of College Station Ad Valorem Tax ValuationCity of College Station Ad Valorem  Tax  Valuation 7 0007,000  6 0006,000  5,000 $4 000S $4,000 NS3 000ON3,000 LLIMIL2,000 M1,0001,000  00  2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20112002200320042005200620072008200920102011 * Assessed value is 100% of the estimated value Assessed value is 100% of the estimated value. 40 CITY ORGANIZATION City Manager Executive Director Business Services Deputy City Manager Deputy City Manager Public Communications Executive Director Planning and Development Services Fire / EOC Police Parks and Recreation Human Resources Intergov’t Relations TAMU, County, Bryan, CSISD Public Works Water Services Electric Utility Economic Development Legislative Affairs Planning & Development Community Development Engineering Code Enforcement Neighborhood Services Northgate District Utility Customer Services Treasury Budget Purchasing Accounting Municipal Court Fiscal Services Strategic Planning Information Technology 41 Strategic Planning and Budget Process – FY 2011‐2012  January  Budget staff meets to go over general action plans for the upcoming budget season and assign  duties and responsibilities.   Preliminary work begins on upcoming fiscal year budget for the Operating and Capital  Improvement Program (CIP) budgets.   Personnel summaries and salary data is sent to City departments to begin preparation of the  Salary and Benefits portion of the budget.  February  Requests for fixed cost information as well as vehicle and equipment replacement data are  sent out to the City departments.   Budget Staff prepares and distributes 1st quarter financial reports and departmental forecasts.  March  Budget analysts prepare Department and Fund summaries, prepare and update the computer  system, and finalize budget amounts for fixed costs.   Budget analysts develop and analyze forecasts and preliminary rate models.   Budget Staff meets with City Departments to review/discuss/revise CIP budget submissions.  April  Budget department kicks off new budget year with City departments.    Analysts begin preliminary work with Departments and assist Departments in preparing their  budget submittal.   Continue analysis and preparation of the CIP budget.  May  Department budgets are due back to the Budget Office.    Budget Analysts analyze and review base budget requests, requests for increases in funding via  service level adjustments (SLAs), as well as budget reduction submittals with departments.   Budget Staff prepares and distributes 2nd quarter financial reports and departmental forecasts.   Budget Staff and Capital Projects Department meet with City Manager to review proposed CIP.  June  Budget Staff prepares Proposed Budgets and meets with Department Directors and City  Manager to discuss budget requests and service levels.    City Council participates in a Strategic Planning Retreat to review mission and vision statements  and identify strategic priorities for the upcoming fiscal year.   Budget Staff and Capital Project Department present the proposed CIP to the Planning and  Zoning Commission and Parks and Recreation Board.  July  Budget Staff prepares Proposed Budget Document.  August  Present Proposed Budget to City Council.   Conduct televised budget workshops during scheduled Council meetings to review Proposed  Operating and Capital Improvement Program budgets.   Budget Staff prepares and distributes 3rd quarter financial reports and departmental forecasts.  September  Publish required Tax Notices.   Conduct required Public Hearings.   Council adoption of Budget and Tax Rate.  October  Prepare Approved Budget Document and Approved Capital Improvement Programs Document.  November‐  December   Budget Staff prepares and distributes 4th quarter financial reports and departmental forecasts.   Conduct Departmental Reviews and Special Projects.   Monitor Budget.   Request for CIP budget submissions sent out to Departments.  42 General Fund The General Fund accounts for all activities typically considered governmental functions of the City. These include Public Safety, Public Works, Parks and Recreation, as well as Planning and Development Services. Also included are the primary support services for these areas such as Fiscal Services, Information Technology, and administrative services in General Government. The General Fund is budgeted using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. This is the same measurement focus and basis of accounting used for governmental fund financial statement reporting. Revenues are recognized when they become measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. Expenditures are recognized when the related fund liability is incurred with the exception of several items. The full listing of these exceptions can be found in the Financial Policies on page F-1. The General Fund is influenced by current policies and approved policy changes. The policies include inter-fund equity; maintaining a balance between revenues and expenditures; and maintaining the level of service currently provided as the city experiences residential and commercial growth. Total projected FY12 General Fund revenues are $54,260,962. This is a 1.7% increase from the FY11 revised budget. This increase is primarily due to an increase in Ad Valorem Tax revenue, which is the result of a shift in the debt service portion of the effective tax rate to the operation and maintenance portion of the tax rate. The shift of 0.9110 cents per $100 valuation increases the estimated revenue for the General Fund by just over $1 million. Also, in anticipation of a very slight upturn in the economy, projected sales tax revenue has been budgeted as a 2% increase over the FY11 year end estimate. Revenue projections are realistic estimates relative to historical trends and consider economic variables that affect the City’s revenue stream. Revenue streams such as Sales Tax, which historically, have been steady with consistent growth, are flat or very slightly increased in some cases. Appendix D provides historic data on all General Fund revenue categories. Major revenue estimates and assumptions are explained below. 1. Property Taxes in FY12 are projected to be $13,627,371. The anticipated revenues are based on the approved operations and maintenance (O&M) tax rate of 23.6459 cents per $100 valuation. The O&M portion of the tax rate reflects a 0.9110 cent increase over the FY11 O&M portion of the tax rate, due to a shift from the debt portion of the tax rate in FY12. The additional revenue generated by this increase will be used to fund additional Fire personnel. 2. Sales Tax is projected to be $20,350,000 in FY12; this projection reflects a 2% increase over the FY11 year end estimate. Sales Tax revenue estimates are based on analysis of historic revenues and expected future retail sales and employment. Sales tax is the largest revenue stream in the General Fund, and makes up approximately 37% of overall General Fund revenues. 3. Mixed Drink and Franchise Taxes are projected to be $2,422,300, which is 3.9% below the FY11 revised budget. Mixed Drink Tax revenue decreased due to recent state budget changes which reduce the City portion of the state’s mixed drink tax. Franchise taxes include phone, cable, and natural gas. 4. Permit Revenue for FY12 is estimated to be $968,866. This is a decrease in projected permit revenue by 2% from FY 2011 year end estimate. This slight decrease is based on recent trends in single-family construction through June, 2011. 5. Intergovernmental Revenues for FY12 are anticipated to be $241,305, or 48% lower than the FY11 year end estimate. The FY11 year end estimate includes grant funds received in FY11 - grant funds are not budgeted until they are approved or received. Among the intergovernmental revenues the City anticipates receiving in FY12 are reimbursement from TAMU for staffing Fire Station #4, and reimbursement from City of Bryan, TAMU, and Brazos County for a portion of the staff assistant position for the Joint Emergency Operations Center. 43 6. Parks and Recreation revenues are estimated to be $80,500 in FY12. This is a 6.9% decrease from the FY11 revised budget. Most of the Parks and Recreation revenue is recorded in the Recreation Fund. 7. Other Service Charges include miscellaneous charges and fees from various departments within the general fund, including Development Services, Police, Fire, and Municipal Court. These revenues are projected to be $2,679,010 in FY12. This is an increase over the prior year’s budget due primarily to the increase in EMS transport fees based on recent trends. 8. Fines, Forfeits, and Penalties are principally ticket and court fines from Municipal Court. These fines are generated primarily through traffic citations. Fines, forfeits, and penalties are projected to be $3,401,529 in FY12, which is in line with the FY11 year-end estimate. 9. Investment earnings are projected to be $67,016 in FY12. Investment earnings in FY11 were adjusted down to reflect the economic downturn and very low interest rates. FY12 projected earnings are anticipated to be even lower based on the timing of the maturity of some of the higher earning investments. 10. Miscellaneous Revenues include such items as rents and royalties, various donations, collection service fees, sale of abandoned property, sale of fixed assets, etc. FY12 estimated revenue is $362,795. 11. Return on Investment (ROI) transfers from the enterprise funds are projected to be $10,060,270 for FY12. The approved budget includes a reduction in the Electric ROI of $2M. Approved Net Expenditures for FY12 are $54,898,894 or 1.8% lower than the FY11 revised budget. The approved General Fund budget includes additional funds for public safety, street maintenance, and minimal salary increases. The final step in changing the Police Department pay structure to a step pay program is for sergeants and lieutenants increases, which is included in the FY12 approved budget at $206,155. Also included in the approved budget for the Police Department is funding for Fitlife testing of $22,375 to help ensure the health and fitness of the police force. Funds in the amount of $1,214,485 recurring and $639,070 one-time are included for the addition of nine firefighters and their related equipment purchases to the Fire Department for the operations of Fire Station #6. Also, budgeted is $80,000 in one-time expenditures for upgrades needed at Fire Station #4 – one-half of the cost of these upgrades will be reimbursed by Texas A&M University. $350,000 is budgeted in Public Works for thoroughfare street rehabilitation projects, and $25,000 for a structural study of the Conference Center. One-time funds in the amount of $50,000 are included in the Planning and Development Department for a Wellborn Small Area Plan. Also approved is one-time funding for Parks and Recreation registration software of $18,000 along with recurring costs of $25,000. Athletic Fields equipment one-time costs are included $22,200, and savings of $25,000 for reduction and relocation of Christmas in the Park. $13,275 in recurring funding is included for the City Secretary Office for codification maintenance costs. Finally, $54,431 in recurring funding is budgeted for the addition of one position to the City’s Internal Audit department. In addition to the $206,155 for the police pay increases mentioned above, funds in the amount of $699,093 are included in the FY12 approved General Fund budget for a pay plan. The total approved pay plan funding for the General Fund is $905,248. A total of 587.80 positions are included in the approved General Fund budget. A total of 21.25 full-time equivalent positions were permanently reduced from the FY12 budget. An additional 9.0 Firefighters have been added in the FY12 approved budget. Also, a signal tech position was added in the Public Works Department and an Internal Audit position was added to General Government. Through the restructuring process, 13.5 net positions were transferred to various departments in the City. This results in an overall decrease of 23.75 positions in the General Fund from the FY11 Revised Budget. A full listing of personnel can be found in Appendix C. 44 FY10 Actual FY11 Revised Budget FY11 Year- End Estimate FY12 Approved Base Budget FY12 Approved Budget % Change in Budget FY11-FY12 Beginning Fund Balance 8,192,824$ $ 11,651,288 $ 11,651,288 $ 9,909,630 $ 9,909,630 REVENUES: Ad Valorem Tax 11,172,907$ 12,453,704$ 12,444,704$ 13,627,371$ 13,627,371$ 9.4% Sales Tax 19,328,577 19,077,164 19,950,000 20,350,000 20,350,000 6.7% Mixed Drink & Franchise 2,633,328 2,520,000 2,506,000 2,422,300 2,422,300 -3.9% Licenses & Permits 964,345 843,285 988,635 968,866 968,866 14.9% Intergovernmental 692,354 176,305 465,005 241,305 241,305 36.9% Parks & Recreation 1,143,076 86,500 85,000 80,500 80,500 -6.9% Other Charges for Services 2,749,982 2,285,087 2,683,500 2,639,010 2,679,010 17.2% Fines, Forfeits & Penalties 3,445,152 3,436,065 3,334,950 3,401,529 3,401,529 -1.0% Investment Earnings 55,089 115,000 66,352 67,016 67,016 -41.7% Miscellaneous 675,790 367,745 372,075 362,795 362,795 -1.3% Return on Investment 12,254,762 11,979,347 10,479,347 10,060,270 10,060,270 -16.0% Other - - - - - TOTAL REVENUES 55,115,362$ 53,340,202$ 53,375,568$ 54,220,962$ 54,260,962$ 1.7% TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE 63,308,186$ 64,991,490$ 65,026,856$ 64,130,592$ 64,170,592$ -1.3% EXPENDITURES: Police Department 13,733,023$ 14,742,851$ 14,894,279$ 14,951,669$ 14,974,044$ 1.6% Fire Department 11,487,939 12,043,131 11,441,598 11,622,269 13,555,824 12.6% Public Works Department 7,922,794 7,825,322 7,538,748 6,798,880 6,823,880 -12.8% Parks & Recreation Department 8,760,312 5,350,883 5,314,491 4,999,466 5,044,666 -5.7% Public Library 1,079,973 1,059,173 1,047,475 1,071,654 1,071,654 1.2% Planning & Development Services 2,539,478 3,513,042 3,469,595 3,711,302 3,761,302 7.1% Information Technology 3,948,754 4,012,060 3,995,222 3,975,499 3,975,499 -0.9% Fiscal Services 3,078,934 3,113,654 3,051,854 3,054,633 3,054,633 -1.9% General Government 4,061,646 4,422,812 4,254,268 3,620,497 3,674,203 -16.9% Pay Plan - - - - - Total Operating Expenditures 56,612,853$ 56,082,928$ 55,007,530$ 53,805,869$ 55,935,705$ -0.3% General & Administrative Transfers (6,219,706)$ (6,238,087)$ (6,070,440)$ (5,645,980)$ (5,668,355)$ -9.1% Public Agency Funding 779,883$ 742,442$ 742,442$ 932,563$ 932,563$ 25.6% Other/Other Transfers Out 422,000 4,880,583 5,014,805 3,427,883 3,427,883 -29.8% Contingency 50,000 451,393 422,889 271,098 271,098 -39.9% Total Other Financing (Sources) Uses 1,251,883$ 6,074,418$ 6,180,136$ 4,631,544$ 4,631,544$ -23.8% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 51,645,030$ 55,919,259$ 55,117,226$ 52,791,433$ 54,898,894$ -1.8% Increase (Decrease) In Fund Balance 3,470,332 (2,579,057) (1,741,658) 1,429,529 (637,932) Adjust to tie to CAFR (11,868) Ending Fund Balance 11,651,288$ 9,072,231$ 9,909,630$ 11,339,159$ 9,271,698$ City of College Station General Fund Fund Summary 45 Ad Valorem Tax 25.11% Sales Tax 37.50% Mixed Drink &  Franchise 4.46% Licenses & Permits 1.79% Intergovernmental 0.44%Parks & Recreation 0.15% Other Charges for  Services 4.94% Fines, Forfeits &  Penalties 6.27% Investment Earnings 0.12% Miscellaneous 0.67% Return on Investment 18.54% General Fund ‐Sources Fire Department 22.38% Public Works  Department General Fund ‐Uses Police Department 24.72% 22.38%Department 11.27% Parks & Recreation  Department 8.33% Public Library 1.77% Planning &  Development Services 6.21% Information  Technology 6.56%Fiscal Services 5.04% General Government 6.07% Public Agency Funding 1.54% Other/Other Transfers  Out 5.66% Contingency 0.45% 46 City of College Station General Fund Operations & Maintenance Summary EXPENDITURE BY DEPARTMENT Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Police 13,733,023$ 14,742,851$ 14,894,279$ 14,951,669$ 14,974,044$ 1.57% Fire 11,487,939 12,043,131 11,441,598 11,622,269 13,555,824 12.56% Public Works 7,021,372 6,913,690 6,740,917 6,798,880 6,823,880 -1.30% CIP 901,422 911,632 797,831 - - -100.00% Parks and Recreation 8,760,312 5,350,883 5,314,491 4,999,466 5,044,666 -5.72% Library 1,079,973 1,059,173 1,047,475 1,071,654 1,071,654 1.18% Planning and Development Services 2,539,478 3,513,042 3,469,595 3,711,302 3,761,302 7.07% Information Technology 3,948,754 4,012,060 3,995,222 3,975,499 3,975,499 -0.91% Fiscal Services 3,078,934 3,113,654 3,051,854 3,054,633 3,054,633 -1.90% General Government 4,061,646 4,422,812 4,254,268 3,620,497 3,674,203 -16.93% TOTAL 56,612,853$ 56,082,928$ 55,007,530$ 53,805,869$ 55,935,705$ -0.26% EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Salaries & Benefits 41,761,810$ 41,231,473$ 40,447,636$ 40,403,492$ 41,585,026$ 0.86% Supplies 2,854,441 2,504,529 2,507,492 2,305,984 2,748,635 9.75% Maintenance 3,534,693 3,964,737 3,852,490 3,968,634 4,004,734 1.01% Purchased Services 8,290,716 7,889,188 7,704,988 7,001,709 7,356,560 -6.75% Capital Outlay 171,193 493,001 494,924 126,050 240,750 -51.17% TOTAL 56,612,853$ 56,082,928$ 55,007,530$ 53,805,869$ 55,935,705$ -0.26% PERSONNEL Revised Approved Approved % Change in Actual Actual Budget Base Budget Budget Budget from FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Police 177.50 181.50 184.50 182.50 182.50 -1.08% Fire 122.00 122.00 130.00 130.00 139.00 6.92% Public Works 64.00 64.00 57.00 49.50 49.50 -13.16% CIP 10.00 10.00 10.00 - - -100.00% Parks and Recreation 133.00 133.00 72.30 67.80 67.80 -6.22% Library - - - - - N/A Planning and Development Services 39.50 39.50 47.50 46.00 46.00 -3.16% Information Technology 26.25 33.25 32.25 30.50 30.50 -5.43% Fiscal Services 40.50 40.50 38.50 38.50 38.50 0.00% General Government 40.00 41.00 39.50 33.00 34.00 -13.92% TOTAL 652.75 664.75 611.55 577.80 587.80 -3.88% 47 City Manager Deputy City Manager Chief of Police Internal Affairs Staff Assistant Field Operations Bureau Chief Day Shift / Sector B Evening Shift / Sector C Night Shift / Sector A Special Operations Operational Support Bureau Chief Criminal Investigations Training & Recruiting Community Services Administrative Services Bureau Chief Policy and Accreditation Information Services Technical Coordinator Communications Purchasing / Quartermaster POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 48 City of College Station Police  Department Summary EXPENDITURE BY DIVISION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Police Administration 873,108$ 950,795$ 988,045$ 1,003,779$ 1,003,779$ 5.57% Uniform Patrol*6,324,392 6,849,358 7,065,335 6,977,193 6,977,193 1.87% Criminal Investigation 1,681,846 1,605,240 1,628,032 1,717,632 1,717,632 7.00% Recruiting and Training 473,619 437,852 477,818 471,880 494,255 12.88% Quartermaster Division 1,671,812 1,940,284 1,997,267 1,814,848 1,814,848 -6.46% Communication / Jail 1,688,614 1,772,356 1,645,231 1,811,699 1,811,699 2.22% Special Services 697,907 754,540 736,677 792,596 792,596 5.04% Information Services 321,725 432,426 355,874 362,042 362,042 -16.28% TOTAL 13,733,023$ 14,742,851$ 14,894,279$ 14,951,669$ 14,974,044$ 1.57% EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Salaries & Benefits 11,577,541$ 12,213,081$ 12,301,686$ 12,701,650$ 12,701,650$ 4.00% Supplies 500,829 513,790 593,923 601,469 601,469 17.07% Maintenance 265,479 244,860 235,333 241,609 241,609 -1.33% Purchased Services*1,324,747 1,657,659 1,650,017 1,406,941 1,429,316 -13.78% Capital Outlay 64,427 113,461 113,320 - - -100.00% TOTAL 13,733,023$ 14,742,851$ 14,894,279$ 14,951,669$ 14,974,044$ 1.57% PERSONNEL Revised Approved Approved % Change in Actual Actual Budget Base Budget Budget Budget from FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Police Administration 11.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 0.00% Uniform Patrol 90.50 97.50 96.50 96.50 96.50 0.00% Criminal Investigation 21.00 19.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 0.00% Recruiting and Training 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.00% Quartermaster Division 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00% Communication / Jail 32.00 33.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 0.00% Special Services 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 0.00% Information Services 9.00 8.00 9.00 7.00 7.00 -22.22% TOTAL 177.50 181.50 184.50 182.50 182.50 -1.08% * Funding for Brazos Valley Animal Shelter moved from Police Department to Other Expenditures in the General Fund in FY12 Service Level Adjustments One-Time Recurring Total Fit Life Testing -$ 22,375$ 22,375$ Police SLA TOTAL -$ 22,375$ 22,375$ 49 POLICE DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION Description & Budget Explanation The Administration Division is responsible for the administrative support of all divisions in the Police Department. Program Name: Administration Service Level: To ensure that Departmental programs and activities are in line with the department mission statement and accomplished within budgetary limitations. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Complaints are investigated within 30 days of assignment. 73% 85% 65% 85% Efficiency - The Department stays within budget overall. 100% 100% 100% 100% Output - Percent chapters of policy reviewed annually per CALEA. 100% 100% 100% 100% POLICE DEPARTMENT UNIFORM PATROL Description & Budget Explanation: The Uniform Patrol Division is responsible for providing/coordinating police patrol, special operations, special events, traffic enforcement, animal control and parking enforcement duties. Program Name: Uniform Patrol Service Level: Provide timely initial police services on a 24 hour basis incorporating a geographical accountability model of policing with an emphasis on community engagement and problem solving Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Percent of citizens satisfied with service provided. * 90% 90% 90% * The measurement tool used did not allow for compilation of this data. Efficiency - Percent of Patrol Officers' time that is Unobligated 55% 50% 45% 50% Obligated 45% 50% 55% 50% - Average response time on high priority calls. 6:52 7:00 6:35 6:15 - Average response time on low priority calls. 9:00 10:00 9:00 9:00 Output - No. of high priority calls handled 6,258 6,600 6,600 6,800 - No. of low priority calls handled 52,398 54,000 54,000 55,620 - No. of Total calls handled. 58,656 60,000 60,600 62,420 - No. of Community Oriented Projects addressed. 41 60 40 45 50 Program Name: Special Enforcement Section Service Level: Provide traffic safety through various means in a professional manner. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Percent of citizens satisfied with service provided. * 85% 85% 85% * The measurement tool used did not allow for compilation of this data. Efficiency - Avg. number of hours spent in School Enforcement zones. 584 525 hrs. 585 600 - Avg. number of hours spent in High Crash locations. 1634 575 hrs. 1475 1200 Output - No. of school zone enforcement calls. 852 650 650 650 - No. of school zone enforcement contacts. 1727 1350 1350 1,350 - No. of directed traffic patrols worked. 2141 850 1610 1600 - No. of directed traffic patrols contacts. 4,120 1,400 2,700 2,700 Program Name : Animal Control Service Level: To provide adequate and professional animal control services to the citizens and visitors to the City of College Station. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Percent of citizens satisfied with service. 98% 85% 85% 85% * The measurement tool used does not allow for compilation of this data. Efficiency - Percent of on-duty, animal calls responded to within 15 minutes.80% 80% 80% 82% Output - Calls for service per year 7,127 6,800 7,000 7,000 - No. of animals handled per year 2,247 2,300 2,000 2,000 - No. of special events participated per year. 3 4 4 4 POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION Description & Budget Explanation: The Criminal Investigation Division is responsible for the investigation of serious criminal offenses within the City of College Station. Program Name: Criminal Investigations Service Level:1) To provide effective and efficient investigation of serious criminal offenses within a 2) To provide critical event counseling and advocacy to crime victims and witnesses. 3) To review all offense and arrest reports for thoroughness and accuracy. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness -83% 80% 83% 80% -79% 75% 65% 75% -28% 30% 38% 30% Efficiency - 73% 75% 75% 75% - 100% 100% 100% 100% -17,638 19,000 18,700 19,000 -2,098 2,500 2,500 2,500 -1,631 1,900 1,600 1,900 -529 550 610 550 reasonable amount of time. Percent satisfied on customer survey: Percent cleared on follow-up cases: Percent cleared cases that are cleared by arrest: Number of cases assigned: Number of cases cleared: Number of cases cleared by arrest: Percent of assigned cases disposed of within 60 days: Percent of serious crime victims who receive personal contact from Crime Victims' Advocate: Output Number of cases reviewed: 51 POLICE DEPARTMENT RECRUITING AND TRAINING Description & Budget Explanation: The Recruiting and Training Division recruits, selects and trains sworn and civilian employees. Additionally, the Division provides continuing training to employees. Program Name: Recruiting & Training Service Level: To provide continuing education and training for the enhancement of the professional skills of employees. Performance Measures:FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Percentage of employees that receive that receive 40 hours of in-house training. FY 12 propose removing in-house 100%100%40% 100% - Percentage of civilian employees that receive of 10 hours of in-house training. FY 12 propose removing in-house 100%100%42% 100% Efficiency - Avg. number of training hours provided per employee not including orientation/field training 161 180 140 180 - Avg. number of training hours provided per employee not including orientation/field training 99 126 16 20 Output - No. of in-house training hours 17,765 20,000 11,200 15,000 - No. of outside training hours 5,269 7,500 5,669 6,000 - No. of sworn applications processed 543 500 364 400 - No. of volunteer hours worked *** 1,200 - No. of media inquiries answered ***500 - No. of news releases written ***20 - No. of media appearances ***100 - No. of civilian applications processed ***400 - No. of sworn personnel hired ***10 - No. of civilian personnel hired ***10 - No. of recruiting trips 12 10 4 2 - Orientation/Training hours Sworn 10,646 5,000 16,315 6,400 - Orientation/Training hours Civilian 3,789 3,000 7,991 3,000 * New performance measures for FY12 POLICE DEPARTMENT QUARTERMASTER Description & Budget Explanation: The Quartermaster Division is responsible for maintenance, equipment, and supplies purchased for the Police Department. The duties include the ordering and dispersal of supply and equipment items for use by all Department employees, and coordinating repairs for all the Department's facility and equipment needs. Program Name: Quartermaster Service Level: Provide equipment, supplies and maintenance for the Department. Performance Measures:FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - % satisfied on employee survey.No survey sent out 95%95%93% Efficiency - % of Supply requests filled within 5 working days.99%95%99%93% Output - No. of supply requests filled within 5 working days.1270 850 1800 1900 52 POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS/JAIL Description & Budget Explanation: The Communications/Jail Division is responsible for police communications and dispatch, provides safe and secure detention operations, and provides report taking capabilities for low priority calls. Program Name: Public Safety Communications Service Level: Processing of Police, Fire, and EMS calls for service. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - % satisfied on Citizen Survey. 92% 90% 90% 90% - Number of Citizen Complaints n/a n/a n/a 3 - Attrition Rate n/a n/a n/a 20% Efficiency - Percent of priority 1 police calls dispatched within 3 minutes. 96% 95% 95% 95% - Percent of priority 1 fire calls* dispatched within 60 seconds 93% 95% 50% 90% - Percent of priority 1 fire calls dispatched within 90 seconds n/a n/a n/a 99% - Percent of 911 calls answered within 10 seconds. 99% 95% 99% 95% - Percentage EMD compliance n/a n/a n/a 90% Output - Phone calls processed monthly. 21,936 22,500 22,030 22,500 - Phone calls processed monthly (8am-5pm). 11,187 11,475 10,909 11,250 - 911 phone calls monthly 2,491 2,689 2,303 2,500 - Total police incidents monthly. 11,473 11,703 11,759 11,800 - Total fire incidents monthly.562 607 545 550 - No. of reports taken by Communication Personnel monthly.n/a n/a n/a 100 Program Name: Jail Service Level: Processing of prisoners allowing patrol officers to reduce transport and processing. time of prisoners; keeping an officer in service by taking low priority calls for service over the phone or in person. Performance Measures FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Attrition Rate n/a n/a n/a 30% - Number of Citizen Complaints n/a n/a n/a 3 Efficiency - No. of reports taken by Jail Personnel monthly.** 249 119 250 60 - Average booking time (minutes) n/a n/a n/a 30 Output - No. of meals served per month*** 4,808 3,466 5,076 495 - Average number of hours detainees held per month 12 9 12 12 - No. of prisoners booked monthly.**** 629 578 700 375 *Processsing time has increased due to implementation of call-handling software. We are splitting out the fire stats to better represent the information NFPA is looking for in standard compliance. **Department is recalculating monthly reports and looking at hard copy reports written only by Jail personnel. Previously this included incidents handled in dispatch and reports done by communication operators. ***Updated from' per year' to 'per month' to match other output indicators. ****This number was reduced by half to eliminater previous years' double counting (admission and discharge). This measure now prevents duplicate booking data. 53 POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY SERVICES Description & Budget Explanation: The Community Services Division is responsible for the coordination of the School Resource Officer Program at A&M Consolidated High School and both Middle Schools. The Division is also responsible for a number of programs that involve the community and the public school system, in crime prevention and safety education for our children. Program Name: School Resource Officer Program Service Level: Coordinate the School Resource Officer Program at A&M Consolidated High and Middle Schools while establishing positive relationships with students, faculty, staff and mentoring At-Risk Students. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Annual faculty and staff survey approval rate.93% 90% 94% 90% Efficiency - No. of requests for assistance by teachers and administrators 347 80 600 400 Output - No. of hours monitoring school campuses 1,856 400 1,800 1,500 - No. of at-risk students helped with mentoring sessions.672 700 500 300 Program Name: Taxi and Wrecker Permits Service Level: To assist wrecker and taxi company owners with the permitting of their drivers and vehicles according to state laws and city ordinances. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - No. of citizens, officers and businesses 165 160 190 160 receiving assistance Efficiency - % of complaints completed within 30 days N/A N/A N/A 90% Output - No. of taxis and wreckers receiving permits 166 120 150 120 54 Program Name: Crime Prevention and Community Safety Service Level: To facilitate the exchange of expertise and experience; to promote good practice; and to help identify successful strategies for addressing issues of crime, crime prevention and reduction, and overall community safety and security. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Percentage of citizens satisfied with Crime Prevention presentations given to businesses and community groups N/A N/A N/A 90% Efficiency - Percentage of follow-up action conducted by division personnel within three business days of a request by a citizen or business. N/A N/A N/A 90% Output - No. of Programs and Presentations made 140 150 120 120 - No. of citizens attending. 4,259 2,500 5,000 4,000 POLICE DEPARTMENT INFORMATION SERVICES Description & Budget Services The Information Services Division is responsible for processing and maintaining police records and evidence. Program Name: Information Services Service Level: Process and maintain accurate police records and evidence and provide for the effective and efficient retrieval, distribution, and storage of departmental records and evidence so that information requested by other divisions of the department, prosecutors, and the citizens is readily available. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Percent satisfied on annual customer survey.74% 90% 90% 85% - Percent of time that all incoming records/ evidence are processed correctly. 99% 99% 99% 99% Efficiency - Percent of time reports and supplements rec'd by 8 a.m. are processed by 2 p.m. (noon) 69% 90% 90% 90% - Percent of time mail requests are answered within 48 hours of receipt 80% 95% 90% 90% Output - No. of reports processed annually. 15,401 17,059 16,563 16,894 - No. of Record Technicians used to process reports.334 4 - No. of boxes scanned (avg. 5000 pages per box) 8 12 11 12 - No. of evidence/property items processed annually.10,504 12,274 11,305 11,531 - No. of evidence/property items disposed 7,067 6,200 8,100 10,500 55 City Manager Deputy City Manager Fire Chief Research & Planning Public Information Accreditation Assistant Fire Chief Training Division Quartermaster "A" Shift "B" Shift "C" Shift Emergency Management Coordinator Staff Assistant Fire Marshal Fire Inspection Fire Investigation Public Education Staff Assistant Secretary FIRE DEPARTMENT CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 56 City of College Station Fire Department Summary EXPENDITURE BY DIVISION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Fire Administration 464,603$ 486,281$ 493,720$ 504,590$ 504,590$ 3.77% Emergency Management 263,119 252,270 247,616 246,899 246,899 -2.13% Fire Suppression 7,354,631 7,177,835 7,194,824 7,326,868 8,400,201 17.03% Fire Prevention 638,417 708,125 709,249 686,170 686,170 -3.10% Emergency Medical Services 2,767,169 3,418,620 2,796,189 2,857,742 3,717,964 8.76% TOTAL 11,487,939$ 12,043,131$ 11,441,598$ 11,622,269$ 13,555,824$ 12.56% EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Salaries & Benefits 9,590,120$ 10,005,468$ 9,601,589$ 9,891,017$ 11,032,772$ 10.27% Supplies 848,973 653,858 512,442 493,071 935,526 43.08% Maintenance 162,090 178,738 171,748 189,431 225,531 26.18% Purchased Services 879,940 1,157,669 1,108,421 1,048,750 1,269,495 9.66% Capital Outlay 6,816 47,398 47,398 - 92,500 95.16% TOTAL 11,487,939$ 12,043,131$ 11,441,598$ 11,622,269$ 13,555,824$ 12.56% PERSONNEL Revised Approved Approved % Change in Actual Actual Budget Base Budget Budget Budget from FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Fire Administration 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.00% Emergency Management 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00% Fire Suppression 77.00 78.00 78.00 78.00 87.00 11.54% Fire Prevention 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 0.00% Emergency Medical Services 31.00 30.00 39.00 39.00 39.00 0.00% TOTAL 122.00 122.00 130.00 130.00 139.00 6.92% Service Level Adjustments One-Time Recurring Total Fire Station #6 Ambulance Crew 281,630$ 578,592$ 860,222$ Fire Station #6 Engine Crew & O&M 250,790 591,523 842,313 Fire Station #6 O&M 106,650 44,370 151,020 Station #4 Capital Maintenance 80,000 - 80,000 Fire SLA TOTAL 719,070$ 1,214,485$ 1,933,555$ 57 FIRE DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION Description & Budget Explanation: The Administration Division is responsible for the administrative oversight and administrative support of all divisions and operating units within the Fire Department. Program Name: Administration Service Level: Provide comprehensive planning, operational oversight, interdepartment communication, and budget preparation and monitoring for all divisions and functions within the Fire Department. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Ensure other divisions within the department regularly monitor and report their performance measures. 100% 98% 100% 98% Efficiency - The department operates within Approved budget.100% 97% 97% 97% Output - Percent of policies annually reviewed and revised as needed. 100% 100% 100% 100% - Quarterly company officers meetings conducted. 100% 100% 100% 100% - Monthly battalion chiefs meetings conducted. 92% 90% 90% 90% - Monthly operations division meetings conducted 100% 100% 100% 100% - Weekly department management team meeting conducted 94% 90% 90% 90% FIRE DEPARTMENT HOMELAND SECURITY & EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Description & Budget Explanation: The Division of Homeland Security & Emergency Management is responsible for protecting the city from all hazards through coordinating emergency and/or disaster training, mitigation, preparedness, planning, response and recovery. Program Name: Homeland Security and Emergency Management Service Level:Coordinate Homeland Security and Emergency Management efforts to provide for disaster training, mitigation, preparedness, planning, response and recovery for all hazards in the City. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - State Rating for Planning Preparedness Advanced Advanced Advanced Advanced - State Rating for Training Preparedness Advanced Intermediate Advanced Intermediate - State Rating for Exercise Preparedness Advanced Intermediate Advanced Intermediate - Homeland Security grant management Advanced Advanced Advanced Advanced IAW State & Federal Guidelines Efficiency - Percentage of Annexes Updated 100% 100% 100% 100% - Number of Exercises participated in 10 3 3 3 Output - Number of Public Information & Education Hours 37 30 30 30 - Number of Attendees of Public Information & Education 2471 1500 350 300 - Staff complete 2 State/Federal Approved Courses 12666 - Conduct Emergency Operations Related Training Events 26 6 20 20 - Conduct annual Emergency Management Academy.1111 58 FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE SUPPRESSION Description & Budget Explanation: The Fire Suppression Division provides emergency response to fire, aircraft, EMS, rescue and hazardous materials incidents. Training is another major portion of the Fire Operations function, this includes training with neighboring agencies to allow a more integrated emergency response to the community. Additionally, Fire Suppression assists Fire Prevention with the majority of public education programs. Program Name: Fire Department Suppression Service Level: Provide prompt, effective, and efficient response and mitigation for fire, rescue, and Haz-Mat emergencies. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Percent of response time, which consists of dispatch to first arriving unit on scene (Response time consist of dispatch time*, turnout time, and drive time) >6 30% 27% 30% 30% <6 69% 70% 68% 68% <5 43% 45% 44% 44% <4 25% 25% 24% 23% <3 6% 6% 5% 5% - Percent of time fire damage is confined to the room/structure of origin. 97% 96% 96% 96% - Percent of time a stop loss*** on Haz-Mat incidents are achieved within 1 hour of on scene time. 98% 98% 98% 98% Output - Total number of unit responses. 3,059 3,800 3,395 3,735 - Total number of Fire incidents. 2,301 2,600 2,054 2,450 *Dispatch time is tracked in Police Department's Communication Service Level ***Stop loss is the point in time in which the spread of a material has been contained Service Level: Provide non emergency services to enhance the survivability of citizens, visitors and emergency response personnel in our community. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Output - Total no. of station tours 145 150 160 150 - Total no. of station tour visitors 1,230 1,500 1,650 1,500 - Staff hours committed to station tours 480 500 600 500 - Total no. of public education appearances 160 150 175 150 - Staff hours committed to public education appearances 2,350 2,000 2,100 2,000 - Staff hours committed to reviewing SOP'S / SOG'S 600 750 780 750 - Total no. of EMS riders 450 200 250 200 - Staff hours committed to EMS riders. 3,650 2,400 3,450 2,500 59 Program Name: Training Service Level: Coordinate training, testing, and support necessary to provide prompt, effective and efficient response and mitigation for fire, rescue and Haz-Mat emergencies. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Required/actual continuing education hours: Fire 2200/2604 2200/2200 2200 / 2200 2200 / 2200 ARFF (Aircraft Rescue Fire Fighting) 120/370 120/120 120 / 120 120 / 120 Haz-Mat (Hazardous Materials) 270/425 216/216 216 / 216 216 / 216 - No. of required/actual certifications maintained. 257/340 222/323 222 / 323 222 / 323 - No. of joint training hours with outside agencies 110 100 150 100 Output - No. of TXFIRS reports generated by CSFD* 6,688 7,500 7,315 8,045 - No. of total fire training hours 3,399 5,600 5,670 5,600 *TXFIRS reports now generated on every response 60 FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION Description & Budget Explanation: The Fire Prevention Division does a number of things related to safety to prevent fires as well as investigative services to determine the cause and origin of fires. Fire Prevention is involved in the development process including attendance in PAC meetings, site plans reviews, Fire sprinkler, alarm systems plan reviews and testing. Inspection of new buildings to ensure compliance with the fire code for certificates of occupancy. Public safety and education programs are provided to the citizens of College Station. Program Name: Fire Prevention Service Level: Provide prompt and thorough system acceptance tests and conduct building fire safety inspections to ensure code compliance. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Percent of time acceptance tests are conducted within 1 working day of requests. 100% 98% 100% 98% - Percent of time new business final inspections are held within one working day of requests. 100% 100% 100% 100% Efficiency - No. of inspections per month per officer. 49 30 44 35 - Per capita operating expenditures (for all Fire Prevention/Code Enforcement activities).* $6.79 $7.05 $7.18 $7.06 Output - Total # of new construction-and redevelopment sites. 865 400 400 400 - No. of systems tests conducted per year. 207 100 100 100 - No. of fire safety inspections of businesses. 1,364 600 800 800 - Major violation complaint to response time. 1 day 1day 1 day 1 day - Minor violation complaint to response time. 1 day 1day 1 day 1 day * Major violations are any problems that pose an immediate threat to life, property or the environment. (Locked exits, sprinkler systems out of service, dumping of hazardous materials, unauthorized burning) Service Level: Determine fire cause and origin of all fires responses and location by occupancy of fire injuries/deaths. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Percent of time fire cause and origin are determined when an investigator is called 89% 92% 80% 80% Service Level: Provide public safety education programs. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Percent of class participants satisfied or very satisfied with public safety education programs. 98% 98% 98% 98% - Percent of College Station Citizens receiving public safety education programs 25% 20% 22% 22% Output - No. of fire safety classes. 193 170 170 170 - No. of participants in fire safety classes. 23,995 20,000 21,000 20,000 61 FIRE DEPARTMENT EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE Description & Budget Explanation: The Emergency Medical Service division provides emergency response to medically related emergency calls for assistance in College Station and South Brazos County. Automatic and mutual aid agreements with neighboring entities allow more integrated EMS response to the community. Training and quality assurance are also a major function of the division. Program Name: Emergency Medical Services Service Level: Provide timely response, prompt patient assessment, quality treatment, and transport. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Percent of ALS response time, which consists of dispatch to first arriving unit on scene (Response time consist of dispatch time*, turnout time, and drive time) >6 42% 45% 50% 50% <6 58% 55% 50% 50% <5 39% 39% 39% 39% <4 15% 16% 16% 15% <3 5% 5% 3% 3% - Percent of time patient's condition remained the same or improved during transport. 96% 96% 97% 96% Output - No. of ALS/BLS responses.** 2325/2814 2800/3500 1921/ 3784 2100 / 4160 - Total no. of unit responses. 5,646 6,600 5,485 6,700 - Total no. of incidents. 5,414 6,000 6,600 7,620 *Dispatch time is tracked in Police Department's Communication Service Level. **Advanced life support (ALS) treatment including the administration of medications, defibrillation/cardio version (electric shocks to the heart), intravenous (IV) fluid therapy, advanced airway management, such as intubation, and blood pressure control with MAST (military anti-shock trousers). Basic life support (BLS) treatment including CPR, splitting, bandaging, spinal immobilization, and oxygen therapy. Service Level: Coordinate training, medical direction, and support necessary to provide timely response, prompt patient assessment, quality treatment and transport. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Required/actual continuing education hours: EMT-Basic 20/35 20/20 20 / 20 20 / 20 EMT-Intermediate 28/35 28/28 28 / 28 28 / 28 EMT-Paramedic 36/36 36/36 36 / 36 36 / 36 - No. of required/actual certifications maintained. 297/337 258/310 258 / 310 258 / 310 - No. of staff hours committed to protocol review 1,200 1,000 1,250 1,000 Output - No. of EMS patient reports generated by CSFD.5,414 6,000 6,600 6,700 - No. of EMS training hours. 3,708 4,200 3,500 3,600 62 City Manager Deputy City Manager Director Assistant Director Facilities Maintenance Sanitation Streets , Drainage & Irrigation Traffic Systems Fleet Services Assistant Director Capital Projects Land Acquisition Traffic Engineering Management Support Analyst Administration PUBLIC WORKS CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 63 City of College Station Public Works Department Summary EXPENDITURE BY DIVISION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Public Works Administration 458,183$ 437,484$ 462,578$ 414,103$ 414,103$ -5.34% Traffic Engineering 104,660 127,721 113,760 111,157 111,157 -12.97% Facilities Maintenance 1,224,790 1,358,918 1,268,713 1,272,454 1,297,454 -4.52% Capital Projects - - - 804,573 804,573 N/A Streets Maintenance 2,790,829 2,965,913 2,976,952 3,063,888 3,063,888 3.30% Drainage Maintenance 817,634 937,879 820,288 - - -100.00% Traffic Signs and Markings 327,656 354,852 356,592 341,102 341,102 -3.87% Irrigation Maintenance - 63,951 70,863 106,842 106,842 67.07% Public Works Engineering 709,926 - - - - N/A Traffic Signals 587,694 666,972 671,171 684,761 684,761 2.67% TOTAL 7,021,372$ 6,913,690$ 6,740,917$ 6,798,880$ 6,823,880$ -1.30% EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Salaries & Benefits 3,582,992$ 3,064,092$ 2,922,108$ 3,179,637$ 3,179,637$ 3.77% Supplies 385,028 385,501 439,609 307,565 307,565 -20.22% Maintenance 1,823,019 1,999,502 1,882,240 1,886,636 1,886,636 -5.64% Purchased Services 1,230,333 1,414,595 1,446,960 1,425,042 1,450,042 2.51% Capital Outlay - 50,000 50,000 - - -100.00% TOTAL 7,021,372$ 6,913,690$ 6,740,917$ 6,798,880$ 6,823,880$ -1.30% PERSONNEL Revised Approved Approved % Change in Actual Actual Budget Base Budget Budget Budget from FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Public Works Administration 5.00 4.00 4.00 3.50 3.50 -12.50% Traffic Engineering - 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 -50.00% Facilities Maintenance 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 0.00% Capital Projects*- - - 9.00 9.00 N/A Streets Maintenance 22.00 22.00 19.00 18.00 18.00 -5.26% Drainage Maintenance**12.00 12.00 15.00 - - -100.00% Traffic Signs and Markings 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00% Irrigation Maintenance - - 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00% Public Works Engineering***10.00 9.00 - - - N/A Traffic Signals 5.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 6.00 20.00% TOTAL 64.00 64.00 57.00 49.50 49.50 -13.16% * The Capital Projects Department moved into the Public Works Department in FY12. ** The Drainage Maintenance Division moved into the Drainage Fund in FY12 *** The Public Works Engineering Division moved to the Planning & Development Services Department in FY11. Service Level Adjustments One-Time Recurring Total Facilities - Conference Center A/E Structural Evaluation 25,000$ -$ 25,000$ Public Works SLA TOTAL 25,000$ -$ 25,000$ 64 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION Description & Budget Explanation: The Administration Division serves as the primary customer contact point, and provides administrative support for the nine divisions of the Public Works Department. Program Name: Administration Service Level:Provide prompt and reliable service to our customers both internal and external. Performance Measures FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Dashboard Indicator -% variance of expenditure to budget 1.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% Effectiveness -Percent of internal customers satisfied on customer survey. 95% 95% 95% 95% Efficiency -% of reports submitted on time 100% 100% 100% 100% Output -No. of quarterly reports annually. 4 4 4 4 PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Description & Budget Explanation: The Traffic Engineering Division serves as the primary contact point for citizens, staff and outside agencies. Program Name: Traffic Engineering Service Level:Provide prompt and reliable service to our customers. Performance Measures FY 10 FY 11 FY11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Dashboard Indicator -# transportation issues studied per year N/A 4 4 4 Effectiveness -% studied per year N/A 1 100% 100% Efficiency -% studied before complaint received N/A 0.5 50% 50% Output -No. of reports submitted N/A 4 3 2 65 PUBLIC WORKS FACILITIES MAINTENANCE Description & Budget Explanation: The Facilities Maintenance Division is responsible for the maintenance of the City's office spaces and buildings. Program Name: Facilities Maintenance Service Level:Maintain clean, safe, and comfortable working environment for City employees, customers, and citizens. Performance Measures FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness -Percent satisfied on customer survey. 90% 85% 85% 85% Efficiency -Average response time to emergency repairs.1 Day 1 Day 1 Day 1 Day -Ratio of emergency repair hours to total of all maintenance hours. 2% 4% 3% 3% -Work orders per employee.425 400 425 -Total direct dollar cost/square foot of all maintained facilities $2.75 $2.75 $2.75 $2.75 -Custodial cost per square foot. $1.20 $1.20 $1.20 $1.20 Output -No. of Work orders annually. 1,950 2,200 1,900 2,000 -Total No. of labor hours to Work orders. 8,848 8,900 8,800 9,000 -Labor hrs to preventative maintenance. 1,880 2,000 1,800 1,800 -No of labor hrs to maintenance projects. 1,884 2,000 1,800 1,800 -No of labor hours to emergency repairs. 190 250 200 250 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL PROJECTS DEPARTMENT Description & Budget Explanation: The Capital Projects Department is responsible for managing a significant portion of the capital projects that are included in the City’s capital improvement plan (CIP). Capital projects managed by this department include Street, Park, Facility, Utility and Drainage projects. Program Name: Capital Project Management Service Level:Deliver quality projects to the citizens of College Station within the defined scope, timeline and budget. Performance Measures FY 10 FY 11 FY11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness† Change order percentage relative to construction contract amount: - Construction contract of $249,000 or less 2.0% 5.0% 4.5% 5.0% - Construction contract of $250,000 - $999,000 0.9% 4.0% 3.0% 4.0% - Construction contract of $1 million or greater 3.1% 3.0% 2.0% 3.0% range of the construction bids: - Conceptual Phase Budget: ±30% of Lowest Responsive Bidder 66.7% 85.0% 80.0% 85.0% - Detailed Design Phase Budget: Efficiency † Number of projects that will reach industry accepted milestone completion levels: - Preliminary Engineering N/A 2 1 4 -30% Detailed Design N/A 3 2 4 -60% Detailed Design N/A 5 4 6 -90% Detailed Design N/A 6 5 8 -Final Design N/A 11 12 11 -Bidding Advertisement N/A 14 12 15 -30% Construction N/A 17 15 18 -60% Construction N/A 15 12 14 -90% Construction N/A 12 12 14 - Completion N/A 12 10 14 66 Program Name: Land Acquisition Service Level:Acquire real property, easements and right-of-way in a timely manner . Performance Measures FY 10 FY 11 FY11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness† Amount of time spent on land acquisition: - Land acquisition on small assignments (1 - 5 parcels) 8.2 w/in 9 months 8.5 w/in 9 months - Land acquisition on medium assignments (6-15 parcels) 14.5 w/in 16 months 14.5 w/in 16 months - Land acquisition on large assignments (16-25 parcels) N/A w/in 24 months 24.0 w/in 24 months † Assumes the CMO, City Council, and Client Department (PW, Elec, WS, etc) do not initiate a change that alters the scope, schedule, or budget of the project or assignment. Performance measure does not apply to projects in Northgate or involve the acquisition of land or easements owned by private utility companies (entities other than CSU or Water Services). PUBLIC WORKS STREET MAINTENANCE Description & Budget Explanation: This Division is responsible for the repair and maintenance of City streets and the annual residential street rehabilitation program. The Streets Maintenance Division also provides barricades for special events such as football games, parades, etc. and emergencies such as flooding, fires, ice storms and hazardous materials spills. Program Name: Street Maintenance Service Level: Provide regular maintenance and care of city streets. Performance Measures FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Workload Indicators - Asphalt Failure Repairs: Square Feet 489,008 5,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 - Pothole Operations: # of square feet repaired 68,548 60,000 60,000 30,000 - Street Sweeping: # of curb miles 5,595 6,500 6,000 6,000 - Seal Coat Pavement: # of lane miles 1 20 5 10 - Overlay Program: # of lane miles 2 10 10 10 Efficiency Indicators - Sq. Ft. of Asphalt per Man Hour 65 65 65 65.00 Effectiveness Indicators - Percentage of Planned Seal Coat Program 100% 100% 100% 100% - Percentage of Planned Overlay Program 100% 100% 100% 100% 67 PUBLIC WORKS DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE Description & Budget Explanation: The Drainage Maintenance Division is responsible for the care and maintenance of the drainage ways throughout the City. Program Name: Drainage Maintenance Service Level: Provide a drainage maintenance program that keeps the storm carrying capacity of the system adequate in College Station. Performance Measures FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Workload Indicators - Drainage Maintenance: # of linear feet cleaned 10,465 3,000 15,000 15,000 - Drainage Maintenance: # of linear feet improved 5,254 1,000 1,000 1,000 - ROW Mowing: # of curb miles 5,788 5,000 5,000 5,000 - Finish Mowing: # of curb miles 5,179 3,000 2,500 3,000 - Herbicide Spraying: # of curb miles 983 1,000 1,000 500 - Mosquito Control: # of dunks / # of gallons applied 36,861 350/10 20/0 35/0 Efficiency Indicators - Curb Miles per man hour of mowed ROW 2.5 3 2 2.00 Effectiveness Indicators - Percentage of Creeks Cleaned during year 50% 50% 50% 50% PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC SIGNS AND MARKINGS Description & Budget Explanation: This division is responsible for the installation and maintenance of traffic signs and pavement markings. Program Name: Traffic Signs and Markings Service Level: Maintain, repair, and install street signs and pavement markings to provide safe and efficient movement of motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Performance Measures FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Missing stop sign replacement time 1 hr 1 hr 1 hr 1 hr - Replacement time for all other regulatory signs 72 hrs 72 hrs 72 hrs 72 hrs Efficiency - Cost per work order $270 $380 $300 $350 - No. of work orders per employee 384 375 508 500 Output - Total No. of work orders per year 1,154 1,125 1,525 1,500 - No. of stop signs replaced 213 200 200 180 68 PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC SIGNALS Description & Budget Explanation: The Traffic Division is responsible for the repair and maintenance of traffic signals. Program Name: Traffic Signals Service Level: Maintain and repair traffic signals and school warning devices to provide safe and efficient movement of vehicles and pedestrians. Performance Measures FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Percentage of system available 100% 100% 100% 100% Efficiency - Cost per work order $367 $425 $425 $475 - Cost per intersection $6,500 $6,500 $7,500 $8,000 - Total system downtime per year 0 hrs 0 hr 0 0 - Response time to after-hours calls 1 hr 1 hr 1 hr 1 hr Output - No. of maintenance and repair work orders 1,417 1,350 1,375 1,395 - No. of signal heads replaced & repaired 25 20 10 15 - No. of operation hours per year 585,680 604,440 604,440 638,480 69 City Manager Deputy City Manager Director Administration Assistant Director Operations Senior Park Planner Park Operations West District East District South District Urban Landscapes & Cemetery Recreation Adult Athletics Aquatics Youth Athletics Instruction H/M Athletic Events Kids Klub Special Facilities Conference Center Lincoln Center Special Events Southwood Center Library Heritage Programs PARKS AND RECREATION CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 70 City of College Station Parks and Recreation  Department Summary EXPENDITURE BY DIVISION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Administration 795,514$ 589,540$ 531,997$ 455,060$ 498,060$ -15.52% Recreation 2,034,871 990,784 998,719 920,213 895,213 -9.65% Special Facilities 2,153,332 113,026 116,851 82,915 87,915 -22.22% Parks Operations 2,361,120 2,258,051 2,257,049 2,386,318 2,408,518 6.66% Urban Forestry 1,415,475 1,399,482 1,409,875 1,154,960 1,154,960 -17.47% TOTAL 8,760,312$ 5,350,883$ 5,314,491$ 4,999,466$ 5,044,666$ -5.72% EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Salaries & Benefits* 5,731,929$ 3,804,919$ 3,780,819$ 3,517,900$ 3,511,105$ -7.72% Supplies 607,720 364,940 390,565 367,184 361,184 -1.03% Maintenance 322,935 531,772 542,693 653,093 653,093 22.81% Purchased Services 2,097,728 539,252 490,414 461,289 497,084 -7.82% Capital Outlay - 110,000 110,000 - 22,200 -79.82% TOTAL 8,760,312$ 5,350,883$ 5,314,491$ 4,999,466$ 5,044,666$ -5.72% PERSONNEL Revised Approved Approved % Change in Actual Actual Budget Base Budget Budget Budget from FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Administration 10.50 10.50 10.50 9.50 9.50 -9.52% Recreation*17.50 17.50 9.30 9.30 9.30 0.00% Special Facilities 45.50 45.50 2.00 1.50 1.50 -25.00% Parks Operations 40.00 40.00 35.00 34.00 34.00 -2.86% Urban Landscapes 19.50 19.50 15.50 13.50 13.50 -12.90% TOTAL 133.00 133.00 72.30 67.80 67.80 -6.22% * In both FY11 and FY12, certain PARD positions were moved from the General Fund to the Recreation Fund Service Level Adjustments One-Time Recurring Total Replace Registration / Reservation Software 18,000$ 25,000$ 43,000$ Athletic Field Maintenance 22,200 - 22,200 Reduction & Relocation of Christmas in the Park - (25,000) (25,000) City of College Station 75th Birthday Funding 5,000 - 5,000 Parks and Recreation SLA TOTAL 45,200$ -$ 45,200$ 71 PARKS AND RECREATION ADMINISTRATION Description & Budget Explanation: The Administration Division provides design and administration for all approved Parks capital improvement projects and provides graphics support. The Division serves as a primary customer contact point, and provides administrative assistance to other Departments and Divisions. Program Name: Administration Service Level: Provide departmental administration, customer service, facility rentals, cemetery sales and records administration, all program registration and support, design and administration for all approved capital projects and graphic support. Administration of Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, Cemetery Advisory Committee and Mayor's Council on Physical Fitness meetings. FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Performance Measures: Actual Approved Estimate Approved -Ongoing compliance with requirements for Agency Accreditation 98% 98% 98%98 - Number of Capital Projects and Park Land Dedication Projects over $50,000 - In Progress 14 6 10 3 - Number of construction projects under $50,000 - In Progress 12 6 6 3 - Percentage of drafting work orders completed satisfactorily 97% 97% 97% 97% - Number of acres of neighborhood and mini park land per 1,000 citizens*3.56 3.6 3.6 3.62 - Number of acres of community park land per 1,000 citizens*3.2 3.2 3.2 3.13 Workload & Efficiency Indicators - Number of CIP and Park Land Dedication projects completed.8 12 16 6 - Number of CIP assistance projects (landscape irrigation design) 17 2 2 2 - Number of pavilion and athletic field rental transactions administered 1431 1375 1375 1375 - Number of program registration transactions administered 10,610 8,400 8,400 8400 - Total revenue generated from pavilion rentals**$57,340 $34,000 $34,000 $55,400 - Number of Cemetery transactions administered***826 4,450 3,000 3,000 * Population estimates received from Office of Planning and Development Services - 95,579 as of June 2011. (Formula: Current population is divided by 1,000 = X. Park acreage divided by X = Acres per 1,000) **Revenue is based on approved amounts from performance measures. ***Cemetery transaction administered total = the number of paperwork generated for: space sales, transfers, and interments, the number of documents scanned, data input into the cemetery database, monument permits scanned, and the number of documents scanned, data input into the cemetery database, monument permits scanned, and all above QA'd by a second person. Other transactions include all registration, pavilion rentals, refunds, transfers and cancellations processed. 72 PARKS AND RECREATION RECREATION ADMINISTRATION Description & Budget Explanation: The Recreation Administration Division has several programs that are all directly related to providing recreational, leisure and educational programs and opportunities. Program Name: Athletics Service Level: Provide athletic programs to meet the needs and desires of citizens of all ages, interests and skill levels; host high quality athletic events that will attract out-of-town visitors to our community & increase the economic prosperity of the local community through athletic events that will generate tourist dollars, assist organizations with planning and conducting athletic events that also attract tourists and generate economic growth in our community. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Percent satisfied on customer survey: 97% 98% 98% 98% Swim Team**100% 98% 98% to Rec Fund Swim Clinic**100% 98% 98% to Rec Fund Challenger Sports Program**100% 98% 98% to Rec Fund Efficiency - No. of participants for sponsored tournaments 3,690 7,000 7,000 7,000 Output - No of City Sponsored & Serviced Events 47 15 15 15 - No of Hotel Room nights generated from City Sponsored and Supported Events*21,711 5,000 5,000 5,000 *Will not have 160 team ASA tournament in FY 11 **Moved to Recreation Fund 73 Program Name: Programs and Special Events Service Levels: Provide a variety of special events for the enjoyment of local citizens, and sponsor, co-sponsor and facilitate special events that will enhance local tourism, promote community pride, increase business revenues and increase hotel/motel sales tax revenues. Finally, provide and assist with programs that enhance the arts through encouragement, promotion, improvement, and application of the arts, including, but not limited to instrumental and vocal music, dance, drama, and other arts related, to the presentation, performance, execution and exhibition of these major art forms. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Percentage satisfied on promoter survey. 99% 95% 95% 95% Efficiency - No. of participants at WPC events. 58,091 20,000 20,000 20,000 - No. of participants, non WPC events. 141,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Output -Total programs and special events revenue. *N/A $38,200 $38,200 $30,000 - No. of events at WPC amphitheater. 32 15 15 15 - No. of City programs offered (non WPC). 5 5 5 5 - No. of assisted non city programs/events. 5 5 5 5 * Reduced per Duck Jam Sponsorship Agreement. Program Name: Kids Klub Service Levels: Utilizing school district facilities to make after-school recreation program for children available for the citizens of College Station and provide the opportunity for the participants to experience activities that will result in positive cognitive, physical, social and emotional youth development. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Percent satisfied on customer survey 96% 95% 95% 95% (parents and Kids Klub participants). Efficiency -No. of CSISD students served by 1,020 1,025 1,025 1,025 Kids Klub. - Maintain a counselor to student ratio of 1:12 Number of Counselors. (Months Met) 9 9 9 9 74 PARKS AND RECREATION SPECIAL FACILITIES ‐ HISTORIC PRESERVATION Description & Budget Explanation: Program Name: Heritage Programs Service Level: FY 10 FY 11 FY11 FY12 Performance Measures: Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness -Total no. of Exploring History Lunch Lectures 12 11 11 11 - Total no. of persons attending Historic Lunch Lectures 1296 1,100 1,100 1,100 -Total no. of pages scanned for Project Hold 6493 2,000 2,000 5,000 -Total no. of historic markers awarded 0 3 3 3 - Total no. of awards granted 0 1 1 1 - Total no. of volunteer hours worked 616.75 2,000 2,000 2,000 Efficiency - Average estimated cost per person for lunch lectures 1.59 1.00*1.00$ 1.00$ - Total estimated dollars contributed for lunch lectures 4305 5,500$ 5,500$ 5,500$ Output - Total no. of Exploring History Lunch Lectures 12 11 11 11 - Total no. of oral history interviews 4 5 5 5 - Total no. of community presentations 43 32 32 32 - Total no.of exhibits 3 2 2 2 - Total no. of persons in attendance at community presentations 2361 2,500 2,500 2,500 *Lunch sponsors are secured for the lectures. PARKS AND RECREATION OPERATIONS Description & Budget Explanation: The Operations Division is responsible for park grounds maintenance, facilities repairs and replacements, and recreation programs support. Program Name: Parks Operations Service Level:Provide clean, safe and well-maintained leisure facilities and provide support for recreation programs and special events. Performance Measures FY 10 FY 11 FY11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness -Percent of overall park maintenance standards met. 87.0% 90.0% 90.0% 90.0% Efficiency - Number of parks maintained through contract.N/A N/A 43 43 Output -No. of pavilions regularly maintained.7 7 7 7 -No. of play courts regularly maintained.39 41.5 41.5 41.5 -No. of athletic fields regularly maintained.46 46 46 46 -No. of park lights regularly maintained.2,379 2,404 2,404 2,404 -No. of parks mowed and trimmed.42 48 48 48 -No. of play units inspected and maintained.63 66 66 66 -No. of special event ceremonies supported.81 90 90 90 The Historic Preservation programs include the Historic Preservation Committee work products: Project HOLD, Exploring History Lunch Lecture series, and the Historic Marker program. To aid in the collection and preservation of the history of the City of College Station and its environs, and to provide for education of citizens on the 75 Program Name: Cemetery Service Level: Provide grounds maintenance and customer service for the municipal cemetery system. Performance Measures:FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY 12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Workload Indicators - Revenue generated by space sales College Station Municipal Cemetery:$26,150 $11,250 $11,250 $11,250 Memorial Cemetery of College Station:$312,276 $827,625 $243,250 $243,250 - Number of burials (all types) College Station Municipal Cemetery:82 45 80 80 Memorial Cemetery of College Station:39 50 50 50 Effectiveness Indicators - College Station Municipal Cemetery: Standard:22 10 10 10 Cremate:2 0 5 5 Infant:4 0 1 1 Memorial Cemetery of College Station Municipal: Standard:86 109 70 70 Niche:0 0 16 16 Infant:1 0 1 1 AFOH: Standard:88 300 70 70 Niche:36 0 16 16 Program Name: Urban Landscapes Service Level: Provide landscape and grounds maintenance operations throughout the park system, and provide support for special events, programs, and activities. Performance Measures:FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY 12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Workload Indicators - No. of labor-hours on Urban Forest Management: 3,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 - No. of labor-hours on horticultural maintenance:4,579 4,300 3,000 3,000 - No. of labor-hours on irrigation system checks, repairs, and improvements:3,914 4,000 4,000 4,000 - No. of labor-hours on special events:5,352 1,500 3,000 3,000 Effectiveness Indicators - On-going compliance with the requirements for Yes Yes Yes Yes agency accreditation Number of spaces sold per year 76 City Manager Deputy City Manager Parks and Recreation Director Special Facilities Admin. Community Librarian COLLEGE STATION LIBRARY CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 77 City of College Station Library Department Summary EXPENDITURE BY DIVISION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Library 1,079,973$ 1,059,173$ 1,047,475$ 1,071,654$ 1,071,654$ 1.18% TOTAL 1,079,973$ 1,059,173$ 1,047,475$ 1,071,654$ 1,071,654$ 1.18% EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Salaries & Benefits -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ N/A Supplies 2,568 1,026 1,845 1,152 1,152 12.28% Maintenance 1,708 1,875 750 1,900 1,900 1.33% Purchased Services 1,035,697 1,026,900 1,024,880 1,028,602 1,028,602 0.17% Capital Outlay 40,000 29,372 20,000 40,000 40,000 36.18% TOTAL 1,079,973$ 1,059,173$ 1,047,475$ 1,071,654$ 1,071,654$ 1.18% PERSONNEL Revised Approved Approved % Change in Actual Actual Budget Base Budget Budget Budget from FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Library - - - - - N/A TOTAL - - - - - N/A 78 PARKS AND RECREATION LIBRARY SERVICES Description & Budget Explanation: The Community Library System is responsible for library services in Brazos County. The Larry J. Ringer Library serves as the College Station component of that system. *The Library is operated through a contract with the City of Bryan, all Library staff are employed by the City of Bryan. These positions are presented only in conjunction with these performance measures and are not reflected in any other portion of this budget document. Program Name: Library Services Service Level: Provide a helpful, friendly, customer oriented library service to Brazos County residents as a part of the Community Library System. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Percent satisfaction level of high or very high on citizen survey. 90.0% 90% 90% 90% - Collection Turnover Rate. 6.52 5 5 5 Efficiency - Collection per staff (21 staff) 4,900 4,900 4,900 4,900 - Library cost per capita (95,337 in Apr. 2011) $11.45 $12.54 $12.54 $12.54 - Circulation per capita (95,337 in Apr. 2011) 6.09 4.95 4.95 4.95 Output - Circulation. 574,454 450 450 450 - Collection size. 88,000 88,000 88,000 88,000 - Reference transactions. 14,057 15,000 15,000 15,000 - Number of Library visits. 249,378 233,900 234,000 234,000 79 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT   SERVICES  CITY OF COLLEGE STATION City Manager Executive Director Planning and Development Services Community  Development Northgate  Operations Assistant  Director (DS) Development  Coordination Building Code  Enforcement Assistant  Director (C&NS) Planning Neighborhood  Services Greenways GIS City Engineer Transportation 80 City of College Station Planning and Development Services Department Summary EXPENDITURE BY DIVISION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Administration 320,897$ 305,176$ 339,646$ 556,741$ 556,741$ 82.43% Civil Engineering - 763,921 749,354 777,037 777,037 1.72% Building 467,852 511,324 489,096 527,780 527,780 3.22% Development Coordination 435,766 495,314 492,947 546,804 546,804 10.40% Code Enforcement 391,620 366,464 348,145 333,390 333,390 -9.03% Planning 607,691 638,346 634,274 584,312 634,312 -0.63% Neighborhood Services 69,933 99,486 94,433 86,727 86,727 -12.82% Transportation 95,907 124,096 125,955 113,170 113,170 -8.80% Greenways 82,855 111,933 111,737 115,502 115,502 3.19% Geographic Info. Services 66,957 96,982 84,008 69,839 69,839 -27.99% TOTAL 2,539,478$ 3,513,042$ 3,469,595$ 3,711,302$ 3,761,302$ 7.07% EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Salaries & Benefits 2,261,480$ 3,029,874$ 2,973,702$ 3,222,028$ 3,222,028$ 6.34% Supplies 49,423 106,345 97,023 86,838 89,838 -15.52% Maintenance 20,108 40,046 39,458 41,067 41,067 2.55% Purchased Services 208,467 336,777 359,412 361,369 408,369 21.26% Capital Outlay - - - - - N/A TOTAL 2,539,478$ 3,513,042$ 3,469,595$ 3,711,302$ 3,761,302$ 7.07% PERSONNEL Revised Approved Approved % Change in Actual Actual Budget Base Budget Budget Budget from FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Administration 3.00 3.00 3.00 4.50 4.50 50.00% Civil Engineering*- - 9.00 9.00 9.00 0.00% Building 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 0.00% Development Coordination 8.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 0.00% Code Enforcement 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 -16.67% Planning 8.50 8.50 8.25 7.50 7.50 -9.09% Neighborhood Services 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00% Transportation 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00% Greenways 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00% Geographic Info. Services 2.00 2.00 2.25 1.00 1.00 -55.56% TOTAL 39.50 39.50 47.50 46.00 46.00 -3.16% * In FY11, the Civil Engineering Division moved from the Public Works Department to the Planning & Development Services Department. Service Level Adjustments One-Time Recurring Total Wellborn Small Area Plan 50,000$ -$ 50,000$ Planning and Development Services SLA Total 50,000$ -$ 50,000$ 81 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Description & Budget Explanation: Administration is responsible for providing support and leadership to the Planning, Building, Development Coordination, Transportation, Greenways, and GIS functions. Many of the implementation plans within the City Council's strategic plan are overseen by this division. Administration establishes and monitors the successful application of the Department's budget, engages in educational outreach opportunities, as well as disseminates important development information to the community. Program Name: Administration ServProvide effective leadership for the Department. Efficiently manage all Department activities. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Workload Indicators - No. of staff supervised 42 46 43 57 - $ of operating budget $2.8 mil $3.5 mil $3.5 mil $4.48 mil Efficiency Indicators -Percent of operating budget recovered through fees 73% 66% 50%40% - No. of staff supervised 42 46 43 57 Effectiveness Indicators - No. of newsletter articles prepared annually 9101010 - Percent of staff participating in professional training 100% 100% 100% 100% 82 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING Description & Budget Explanation: Engineering is responsible for the administration of the applicable engineering regulations specifically involving the engineering review and permitting of development projects as well as oversight of the inspection of construction of all public infrastructure with Development and CIP projects. Also manage FEMA floodplains, ROW Abandonments, Oversized Participation, Oil and Gas Permits, Impact Fees, TxDOT permits, driveway permits, surety documents, TCEQ permits, etc. Program Name: Engineering Service Level: Provide excellent customer service protecting the public interest thorough, efficient engineering standards, processes, and review of permitting of development projects including ensuring quality construction through inspection of public infrastructure. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Valuation of Development Permits INSPECTED / Inspector1 $2,149,683 $2,275,128 $3,000,000 $3,200,000 - Valuation of Capital Improvement Projects requiring Inspection / Inspector2 $2,622,261 $4,927,301 $3,000,000 $6,000,000 - Combined Valuation of Permits and Projects requiring Inspection / Inspector3 $4,771,945 $7,199,429 $6,000,000 $9,200,000 Efficiency - Number of Development Permits Issued per review Engineer4 36.0 35.0 35.0 36.0 - Valuation of Development Permits Issued per review Engineer5 $4,102,012 $4,865,819 $7,500,000 $6,400,000 Output -Number of Development Permits Issued6 71 70 70 72.0 - Valuation of Development Permits INSPECTED7 $9,167,707 $11,522,870 $12,000,000 $12,800,000 - Valuation of Capital Improvement requiring Inspection8 $10,770,907 $19,697,203 $12,000,000 $24,000,000 - Total Valuation of Permits and Projects requiring Inspection9 $19,938,614 $31,220,073 $24,000,000 $36,800,000 1 Portion of valuation of development project completed within period divided by 4 inspectors 2 Portion of valuation of CIP completed within period divided by 4 inspectors 3 Sum of portions of valuation of development projects and CIP completed within period divided by 4 inspectors 4 Number of Development permits approved and issued within period divided by 2 engineers 5 Total valuation of development permits approved and issued within period divided by 2 engineers 6 Number of Development permits approved and issued within period 7 Total valuation of development permits approved and issued within period 8 Portion of valuation of CIP completed within period 9 Sum of portion of valuation of development projects and CIP completed within period * Valuation of CIP being inspected by Capital Project Engineers within period per Engineer (5) $4,800,000 Actual number of CIP projects inspected during period 20 83 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Description & Budget Explanation: The Development Services Division is responsible for providing support and leadership to the planning, building, and development coordination functions. Building and Development Coordination are included within the Development Services Division which is responsible for processing, reviewing, and coordinating all new public and private development within the City. Program Name: Building Service Level: Perform thorough and efficient building plan review, inspection services and permit administration. Perform efficient administration of property maintenance code. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness Indicators -% of commercial plans reviewed within 5 days. 94% 90% 94% 90% -% of buildings inspected within one half day of request.99% 98% 98% 98% -Update and adopt new codes within 18 months of publication N/A N/A 100 100 -% of complaints regarding unsafe structures responded to within one week 98% 95% 98% 95% -Periodic minor amendments 1 2 1 2 Efficiency Indicators -% of single family permits reviewed within 24 hrs. 94% 90% 94% 90% -No. of inspections per day per inspector. 17 14 12 12 Output -Multi-family and commercial plans reviewed. 260 225 175 200 -Annual inspections performed. 11,926 13,000 11,500 11,500 -No. of building inspections per inspector. 2,865 3,250 2,875 2,875 -100% 100% 100% 100% -No. of construction board meetings 1 2 5 6 -No. of presentations 4 10 6 6 -No. of articles prepared 13 20 10 10 % of building department personnel maintaining minimum established educational training hours 84 Program Name: Development Coordination Service Level: Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Workload Indicators - No. of customer contacts 36,642 26,000 30,000 32,000 - No. of development and engr. projects processed 452 400 380 N/A - No. of submittals processed 1,330 1,200 1,100 1,150 - No. of building permits processed 5,972 5,500 5,500 5,600 - No. of inspections processed 12,379 12,000 12,000 12,100 - No. of rental registrations 11,552 7,200 8,850 8,850 -No. of comm., board, and special meetings 174 150 65 85 - No. of easements 50 60 50 N/A - No. of public notifications (ads)110 80 85 85 - No. of public notices (letters)1,187 650 650 675 - No. of code enforcement letters 3,504 4,000 1,000 N/A - No. of public hearing signs posted 57 40 38 N/A - No. of open records requests 160 175 125 N/A - No. of minor building permits reviewed 508 500 350 375 - No. of PACs 114 120 80 N/A - Amount of fees processed $2,069,099 1.8 mil 2.1 mil 2.2 mil Efficiency Indicators - No. of customer contacts per support staff 4,580 3,250 3,750 3,555 -No. of development submittals processed per CSR 615 400 370 383 -No. of building permits processed per CSR 2,915 1,833 1,833 1,865 -No. of inspections processed per CSR 5,644 4,000 4,000 4,000 -No. of commission, board, and special meetings coordinated per Staff Asst 44 30 13 17 -No. of public notifications processed per Staff Assistant 594 400 325 338 -Amount of fees processed per CSR $689,700 $600,000 $700,000 $733,333 Effectiveness Indicators -% of CSRs certified as Permit Technicians 66%66%66%N/A -% of notifications processed within deadlines 100% 100% 100% 100% -% of meeting minutes prepared within two meeting cycles 100% 100% 100% 100% -% of inspections input within one hour N/A 95%95%95% -% of staff participating in professional development 100% 100% 100% 100% Input - No. of staff 8 8 8 9 Provide comprehensive administrative support to all department staff, including Public Works Engineering staff, as well as the P&Z Commission and all other Boards and Committees. Process all permits and inspection requests, as well as all development submittals in a timely manner. Coordinate with various entities to secure appropriate addresses for all developing 85 Program Name: Code Enforcement Service Level: Ensure a healthy and safe community through the timely, proactive, and reactive enforcement of property standards, codes and ordinances. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Workload Indicators - Percent of staff time spent on proactive code enforcement. 96% 97% 94% 92% - Percent of cases resolved within 30 days. 96% 96% 98% 98% - Percent of cases resolved by voluntary compliance. 99% 99% 99% 99% - % of cases requiring administrative action. 1% 1% 1% 1% Efficiency Indicators - No. of cases resolved per code officer 1,920 1,729 1,284 1,200 - No. of Citizen Complaint investigations** ** 700 482 500 - No. of Loud Party contacts** ** 540 9 20 - No. of Good Job contacts** ** 600 0 0 - No. of New Business' Welcomed** ** 100 69 55 - No. of HOA Events attended** ** 30 30 30 - No. of Multi-Family contacts** ** 40 42 20 - No. of Personal Contacts ** 2,752 2,828 2,500 Output - Total no. of cases. 11,408 10,586 8,965 8,900 - No. of cases resolved. 11,525 10,374 6,420 6,400 - No. of proactive cases. 10,948 10,286 8,212 8,188 - No. of cases taking 30 days or more. 468 423 144 140 - No. of cases resolved by voluntary compliance. 11,476 10,480 6,356 6,336 - No. of cases requiring administrative action. 49 105 64 64 - No. of Weeds & Grass cases. 2,955 1,190 1,214 1,200 - No. of Open storage cases. 721 851 265 250 - No. of sanitation related cases. 1,617 2,800 2,611 2,500 - No. of Junk/abandoned vehicle cases. 190 182 109 100 - No. of landscape and land-use zoning cases* 2,590 N/A N/A - No. of Rental Registration/UDO cases** NA 1,500 2,925 2,925 - No. of signs-handbills cases. 1,081 745 387 350 - No. of parking tickets issued. 162 229 94 90 - No. of other code enforcement cases. 2,254 3,318 1,184 1,575 - No. of inter-departmental (joint) cases. 143 110 126 120 Note: * Indicates a performance measure that will be discontinued beginning FY '11 ** Indicates a new performance measure effective FY '11 86 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING Description & Budget Explanation: Planning is responsible for providing expertise in the field of urban planning to City leadership, citizens, developers, and City staff. Planning will provide current and long-range planning services through the Development Services Division and Community and Neighborhood Planning Division functions to help create a community that enhances and protects the quality of life in College Station. Program Name: Planning Service Level:The Planning function is multifaceted and responsible for maintaining, monitoring and implementing the City's Comprehensive Plan, as well as having project management functions for the thorough and efficient review of platting, zoning and other development cases. Development Review Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Workload Indicators -265 222 202 206 -64 58 68 65 -175 130 148 151 -131 97 104 101 -10 6 7 * -1379 1405 1133 1156 -411 361 175 193 -30 19 21 * -17 12 16 * -29 33 38 * -240 305 152 * - No. of CO inspections ** ** ** 127 Efficiency Indicators -44 37 34 * -29 22 11 * -22 16 25 * -28% 43% 43% * -No. of planner-on-call contacts per planner* 197 201 162 * -Number of development review submittals ** ** **618 -Percentage of staff with over two years of tenure ** ** **57% Effectiveness Indicators -% of development review cases reviewed within five (5) working days.* 89% 89% 92% * - No. of collaborative projects with other community organizations* 4 3 4 * -100% 100% 100% * - Percentage of development review projects approved within three months ** ** ** 75% -57% 100% 57% 57% Community & Neighborhood Planning Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Workload Indicators -** ** ** 2 -** ** ** 3 - Number of prioritized code amendments ** ** ** 4 Efficiency Indicators -** ** ** 80% -** ** ** 25% - ** ** ** 90% -Percentage of staff with over two years of tenure ** ** ** 90% Effectiveness Indicators -Completion of Comprehensive Plan Annual Report ** ** ** Yes - Completion of UDO Annual Report ** ** ** Yes -** ** ** 2 - Number of prioritized code amendments adopted ** ** ** 4 Number of demographic reports distributed ** ** ** 12 -** ** ** 57% -No. of staff 8 8.5 8 7 ** New measure beginning in FY12 * Measures removed for FY12 Number of plans adopted % of non-exempt staff AICP Number of plan implementation programs being managed Percentage of plan deadlines met Percentage of prioritized amendments actively being pursued Percentage of demographic updates distributed within the first week of the month Number of neighborhood, district, and corridor plans initiated % of professional staff maintaining minimum educational training hours* % of non-exempt staff AICP No. of staff reports per planner* No. of board and commission presentations per planner* % City Council appointees participating in prof. training* No. of development review projects No. of board and commission meetings No. of staff reports / coversheets produced No. of presentations to boards and commissions No. of development review projects reviewed per Planner* No. of educational training hours* No. of code amendments* No. of Planner on Call contacts No. of administrative permits No. presentations in the community* No. of meetings with other community orgs.* No. of outreach articles, brochures, etc.* 87 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING Description & Budget Explanation: Community & Neighborhood Planning evaluates current conditions, identifies trends, projects future issues and opportunities and aids the community in planning to achieve its goals for the future. Program Name: Neighborhood Services Service Level: Develop and administer a neighborhood services program that includes association support, Historic Preservation Committee support, planning, hosting related events. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Number of neighborhoods using Mosquito Abatement Program 7 15 5 15 - Number of NEW neighborhood associations registered 2 10 8 15 Efficiency - Average estimated cost per person for sponsored events $7.50 6.00 7.50 $6.50 - Dollars reimbursed for Mosquito Abatement $800.00 0.00 158.00 $1,200 - Dollars disbursed for Gateway Grants $6,724.00 15,000.00 13,500.00 $15,000 Output - Number of Neighborhood Events sponsored 8 12 12 8 - Total number of registered Neighborhood Associations 67 85 70 80 Program Name: Transportation Service Level: Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Workload Indicators -No. of TxDOT permits processed annually 14 15 15 15 -No. of TIAs reviewed annually 14 15 15 15 -No. of newsletter articles written annually 4666 - No. of Comp Plan updates supported annually 3 2 2 3 Efficiency Indicators - Percent of staff participating in professional training 100% 100% 100% 100% - Percent of thoroughfares counted annually thru TIA review 20%20%20% 20% Input - No. of staff 1111 Plans and implements a multi-modal transportation system that provides a high degree of mobility for citizens and visitors to the City of College Station. To lead long-range planning efforts related to transportation and to provide support as different aspects of the transportation 88 Program Name: Greenways Service Level: Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - No. of acres/year acquired for greenways 117 10 10 10 Input - No. of staff 1 1 1 1 Program Name: GIS Mapping Service Level: Produce professional, accurate, high-quality data, maps, programs and analyses in a responsive, timely and efficient manner. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Workload Indicators -No of SAMS and aerials produced for development cases annually 274 220 220 210 -No. of plans, studies, updates, and special projects supported 6 566 Efficiency Indicators -Percent of routine map requests produced W/I 24 hours 90%90% 90% 90% -Percent of GIS database updates completed W/I 5 days of approval 90%90% 90% 90% Effectiveness Indicators -Percent of staff participating in GIS or other professional training 100%100% 100% 100% -Number of GISP certified staff 0000 Input - No. of staff 1211 Maintain, update, and implement the Greenways Master Plan. Preserve greenways and park land through the development process and processing of targeted greenway acquisitions. 89 City Manager Executive Director Business Services Director Assistant Director GIS GIS Coordinator GIS Technician GIS Intern E-GOV E-GOV Technician Business Sysems Manager Systems Analyst MIS Microcomputer Coordinator Microcomputer Specialist Network Analyst Network Admin Communications Communications Services Coordinator Senior Communications Technician Communications Technician IT Support Center Mail INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 90 City of College Station Information Technology Department Summary EXPENDITURE BY DIVISION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Information Technology Administration 446,198$ 457,625$ 460,636$ 465,154$ 465,154$ 1.65% E-Government 150,232 80,568 80,987 79,871 79,871 -0.87% Geographic Information Services 159,730 185,554 179,690 184,384 184,384 -0.63% Mail 106,920 111,321 105,841 91,144 91,144 -18.13% Management Information Services 2,377,613 2,464,894 2,453,208 2,349,310 2,349,310 -4.69% Communication Services* 708,061 712,098 714,860 805,636 805,636 13.14% TOTAL 3,948,754$ 4,012,060$ 3,995,222$ 3,975,499$ 3,975,499$ -0.91% EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Salaries & Benefits 2,347,784$ 2,310,809$ 2,303,781$ 2,246,460$ 2,246,460$ -2.78% Supplies 222,131 260,457 257,429 263,934 263,934 1.33% Maintenance 925,570 939,380 936,571 945,751 945,751 0.68% Purchased Services 405,071 377,208 373,235 463,304 463,304 22.82% Capital Outlay 48,198 124,206 124,206 56,050 56,050 -54.87% TOTAL 3,948,754$ 4,012,060$ 3,995,222$ 3,975,499$ 3,975,499$ -0.91% PERSONNEL Revised Approved Approved % Change in Actual Actual Budget Base Budget Budget Budget from FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Information Technology Administration 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.00% E-Government 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00% Geographic Information Services 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.25 2.25 -10.00% Mail 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.25 1.25 -28.57% Management Information Services 15.00 16.00 16.00 15.00 15.00 -6.25% Communication Services*- 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 0.00% TOTAL 26.25 33.25 32.25 30.50 30.50 -5.43% * In FY10 the Communications Services Department moved from the Communication Fund to the Information Techology Department in the General Fund. 91 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Description & Budget Explanation: Performance Measures*FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Admin/Support Center -Percent Satisfied on IT Customer Satisifaction Survey 85% 85% 85% 85% -Percent total help calls closed by Support Center 35% 33% 33% 33% GIS -Percent Satisfied on IT Customer Satisifaction Survey 85% 85% 85% 85% -Percent GIS system availability 99% 99% 99% 99% E-Government -Percent Satisfied on IT Customer Satisifaction Survey 85% 85% 85% 99% - Percent Web site maintenance requests responded to within 1 business day 100% 100% 99% 100% Communications -Percent satisfied on IT Customer Satisifaction Survey 85% 85% 85.0% 85% -Percent Tier 1 Server and equipment uptime 99.9% 99.9% 99.0% 100% (*As identified in the IT Business Continuity and Recovery Plan) -Percent critial system* availablility connectivity, paging system). 99.9% 99.9% 99.0% 100% (*800 MHz radio system, fiber optic network, telephone system, network MIS -Percent Satisfied on IT Customer Satisifaction Survey 85% 85% 85% 85% - Percent Completion of E-Help work order projects, including Capital projects, by established completion date (Sys Analysts)99% 99% 99% 99% - Percent support calls responded to within established criteria (Micros) 99% 99% 99% 99% - Cost per Call (Micros) $175 $175 $200 $175 - Percent Tier 1 Server and equipment* uptime (Network Analysts) [*As identified in the IT Business Continuity and Recovery Plan]99.9% 99.9% 99.0% 99.0% - Percent Virtual Server CPU Utilization Rate (Network Analysts)40-55% 40-55% 40-55% 40-55% - Achieve designated Percent per year server environment cost reduction for 5 years - base cost $7,020 (Network Analysts)5% 5% 5% 5% Mail -Percent Satisfied on IT Customer Satisifaction Survey 85% 85% 85% 85% -Daily mail pickup and delivery 99% 99% 99% 99% * Information Technology has realigned their performance measures to better reflect the Strategic Plan. The Information Technology department provides services in the following divisions. Administraion / Support Center provides a help desk and City-wide technology support. E-Government maintains and updateds the City Internet and Intranet sites. Geographic Informations Services creates and maintains the City's Geographic Information System (GIS). Management Information Servics (MIS) manages all of the computers, networks, operating systems and applications for all City users. The level of customer service, as judged by our customers, should be the overreaching performance measurement for all Department Divisions. The additional performance measures deal primarily with our response time to customer service requests and server\critical system uptimes. 92 City Manager Executive Director Business Services Assistant Finance Director Accounting Assistant Finance Director Administration Purchasing Municipal Court Budget & Strategic Planning Utility Customer Service Treasurer FISCAL SERVICES CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 93 City of College Station Fiscal Services Department Summary EXPENDITURE BY DIVISION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Fiscal Administration* 560,541$ 576,967$ 561,613$ 310,624$ 310,624$ -46.16% Accounting 674,346 683,972 673,093 749,599 749,599 9.59% Purchasing 324,735 331,685 330,222 339,637 339,637 2.40% Budget and Strategic Planning 385,217 395,405 355,513 411,212 411,212 4.00% Municipal Court 989,019 977,582 982,196 1,090,851 1,090,851 11.59% Judiciary 145,076 148,043 149,217 152,710 152,710 3.15% TOTAL 3,078,934$ 3,113,654$ 3,051,854$ 3,054,633$ 3,054,633$ -1.90% EXPENDITURES BY CLASSIFICATION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Salaries & Benefits 2,351,777$ 2,405,069$ 2,361,608$ 2,584,334$ 2,584,334$ 7.45% Supplies 43,410 35,300 37,033 35,003 35,003 -0.84% Maintenance 5,709 7,224 6,416 6,212 6,212 -14.01% Purchased Services*678,038 666,061 646,797 429,084 429,084 -35.58% Capital Outlay - - - - - N/A TOTAL 3,078,934$ 3,113,654$ 3,051,854$ 3,054,633$ 3,054,633$ -1.90% PERSONNEL Revised Approved Approved % Change in Actual Actual Budget Base Budget Budget Budget from FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Fiscal Administration 3.50 4.50 4.00 3.00 3.00 -25.00% Accounting 10.00 9.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 0.00% Purchasing 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.00% Budget and Strategic Planning 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.00% Municipal Court 16.50 16.50 16.00 17.00 17.00 6.25% Judiciary 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 0.00% TOTAL 40.50 40.50 38.50 38.50 38.50 0.00% *Beginning in FY12, Appraisal District fees will be budgeted and paid for by General Fund Non-Departmental funds. 94 FISCAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Description & Budget Explanation The Fiscal Services Administration Division assists departments in delivering services through effective financial management. This activity is accomplished through the review of financial aspects of contracts, and administration of the finance, accounting, purchasing, risk management, and municipal court functions. Cash and debt management is also performed by this office. Program Name: Fiscal Services - Information Service Level:Provide accurate and timely information to the council and staff for use in planning, setting goals, and monitoring programs. Performance Measures FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Annual internal survey of satisfaction rate. N/A N/A N/A N/A Efficiency -Percent of all contracts reviewed within 2 working days of receipt. 95% 95% 95% 95% -Percent of reports completed within 20 working days of the 100% 100% 100% 100% end of the period. Output -No. of contracts reviewed annually. 288 380 340 350 -No. of quarterly investment reports.4444 Program Name: Treasury Service Level:Administer cash and debt operations of City through management of cash flows, investments, and payments. Performance Measures FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness -Portfolio rate of return as a percentage of similarly weighted average maturity treasury notes. 100% 100% 100% 100% Efficiency -Percent of available cash invested. 77% 76% 75% 75% Output -Annual dollar amount of investment income earned. $1,146,000 $700,000 $730,000 $500,000 -Provide monthly investment market-to-market report. 12 12 12 12 95 FISCAL SERVICES ACCOUNTING Description & Budget Explanation: The Accounting Division is responsible for processing, recording, and reporting all financial transactions of the City. Program Name: Accounting Service Level:Provide accurate and timely information to customers. Performance Measures FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness -Receive the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting from GFOA for the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.Yes Yes Yes Yes -Receive an unqualified audit opinion from external auditors.Yes Yes Yes Yes Efficiency -Percent of month-end transactions recorded by the 10th business day of each month.100% 100% 100% 100% -Complete and submit CAFR to GFOA by March 31 No(a)Yes No(a)Yes -Complete financial statements by January 31 No(a)Yes No(a)Yes Output -No. of month-end transactions recorded by the 10th business day of each month.47 45 47 45 (a) We were granted a 30 day extension. Service Level:Process and record all financial transactions for the City in an accurate, efficient, and timely manner. Performance Measures:FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness -Percent of vendor invoices paid within 30 days of invoice date.99%99%99%99% -Receive an unqualified audit opinion from external auditors.Yes Yes Yes Yes -Clearing account reconciled by the 15th working day after the period close Yes Yes Yes Yes -Contributed capital properly captured and recorded quarterly Yes Yes Yes Yes -Capital asset inventory properly updated and maintained Yes Yes Yes Yes -Annual physical inventory No Yes No Yes -Intergovernmental reports submitted on time Yes Yes Yes Yes Efficiency -Hours spent keying in other's time sheets 240 240 130 130 -Hours spent stuffing paper pay stubs for direct deposit payroll 240 240 60 60 Output -No. of p-card transactions processed 14,014 16,000 12,134 32,000 -No. of EFT's processed for vendor invoices 2,052 2,125 2,070 2,125 -No. of wire transactions.236 15 12 10 -No. of A/P checks.9,770 10,808 8,416 8,000 - No. of Manual Payroll Checks including Gainsharing 119 475 384 400 -No. of payroll direct deposit "checks"26,313 29,440 20,354 30,000 -Amounts billed.6,977,893 6,000,000 6,430,884 6,500,000 -No. of credit card/ACH deposits processed 308,775 300,000 377,304 450,000 -No. of cash receipt transactions.27,083 20,000 9,404 9500 -No. of general ledger reconciliations completed within 30 days.510 450 132 450 -No. of year end journal entries 257 250 250 200 96 FISCAL SERVICES PURCHASING Description & Budget Explanation: The Purchasing Division assists City departments in acquiring quality products and services in an efficient manner and at favorable prices. Purchasing also maintains open communication with City departments and vendors Program Name: Purchasing Service Level:Acquire quality goods and services in a timely and efficient manner within legal parameters for continued City operations. Performance Measures FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness -Satisfaction percentage on annual survey of departments.N/A 90%90%90% -Satisfaction percentage on annual vendor survey.N/A 90%90%90% -Percent of total expenditures done through cooperative purchasing agreements.11%10%10%10% -Percent of City's purchase transactions processed through field purchase orders and procurement cards.94%95%94%95% -Percent of City's dollars handled through the purchasing department for commodities and services.92%91%93%92% -Percent of total dollars utilizing blanket contracts.25%22%22%23% Efficiency -Average cost per purchase order.$275 $262 $257 $266 Output -Total dollar value of all City purchases.$71,037,053 $81,500,000 $81,000,000 $80,000,000 -No. of cooperative agreements in which the City participates.24 24 24 25 -No. of FPO’s and procurement card transactions processed by departments.19,699 25,560 25,000 23,500 -Dollar value of P.O.’s processed by Purchasing staff.$65,572,267 $75,000,000 $78,500,000 $77,000,000 -No. of the following purchasing activities: one-time bids 73 80 75 73 annual bids 21 25 20 23 formal contracts/agreements 340 325 325 330 1 External Vendor Survey conducted December 2009 Service Level:Effectively and efficiently manage and dispose of surplus assets to obtain the greatest value for the City. Performance Measures:FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness -Percentage of all surplus disposed within 6 months of being identified as surplus.100%100%100% 100% Efficiency -Asset recovery percentage on surplus property.unknown 22%20%23% Output -Net amount received after expenses of disposition.$359,398 $300,000 $250,000 $350,000 97 FISCAL SERVICES OFFICE OF BUDGET AND STRATEGIC PLANNING Description & Budget Explanation: Program Name: Budget Preparation, Monitoring and Review Service Level: Prepare, monitor and review all aspects of the annual budget. Performance Measures FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness -Yes Yes Yes Yes Output -Prepare & analyze 5 year revenue & expenditure forecasts monthly 27 27 25 25 -Prepare and distribute operations financial reports to management monthly monthly quarterly monthly -Prepare & analyze CIP financial reports for distribution to management annually 11 11 11 11 -35 35 35 35 -4444 -No. of Outside Agency contracts Managed 15 15 12 11 -No. of Outside Agency reports submitted and reviewed 15 15 48 44 The Office of Budget and Strategic Planning is responsible for preparing, monitoring and reviewing the City’s annual budget. The office works to ensure the overall policy goals of the City are reflected in fund allocation and spending. The office facilitates City Strategic Planning efforts, which involves working with City Council and departments to actively plan for future growth. Ongoing organizational reviews are also conducted to strive towards continuous improvement of city processes. Annual budget document meets requirements for GFOA reporting excellence? No. of Approved Budget Reports prepared and distributed within 90 day of Council approval No. Budget analysis and reports to City Council and Dept. Directors through annual Budget workshops 98 FISCAL SERVICES MUNICIPAL COURT Description & Budget Explanation: Program Name: Case Maintenance Service Level:Provide quality service while providing the City with administration for cases filed for enforcement of Class C misdemeanors. Performance Measures FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Input -n/a 27,000 27,305 28,000 Effectiveness - n/a 80% 80% 80% - n/a 80% 80% 80% Output -n/a 26,000 25,500 27,000 Program Name: Court Collections Service Level:Provide quick and efficient collection of funds from citations issued by public safety officials. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Efficiency -n/a $2,700,000 $2,636,008 $2,700,000 -n/a $3,100,000 $2,855,676 $3,100,000 -n/a $175 $175 $175 Output -n/a $5,368,016 $5,107,266 $5,800,000 Program Name: Hearing Process Service Level:Maintain effective and efficient court procedures in order to earn a high level of public confidence. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness -Percent of case paperwork prepared with notification to all parties ready at least 3 weeks prior to trial. n/a 98% 98% 98% Output -n/a 1,800 1,500 1,700 -n/a 400 450 500 -n/a 250 300 350 Municipal Court provides a competent court system with quality service through the utilization of effective and efficient operating procedures. Total Amount Collected No. of contested cases set. No. of summons issued. Percent of citizen survey respondents rating Court personnel as somewhat or very courteous Percent of citizens survey respondents rating Court personnel as somewhat or very Total Number of Citations Issued No. of subpoenas issued. No. of cases disposed. Amount collected by Court Collections Staff Amount collected by walk-ins Amount collected per citation 99 GENERAL GOVERNMENT CITY OF COLLEGE STATION City Council Internal Auditor City Manager's Office Public Communications & Marketing Human Resources City Secretary Legal 100 City of College Station General Government  Department Summary EXPENDITURE BY DIVISION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Mayor & Council 46,229$ 49,374$ 48,237$ 44,276$ 30,276$ -38.68% City Secretary’s Office 417,406 419,543 453,871 372,071 385,346 -8.15% Internal Auditor 115,995 118,725 118,864 122,948 177,379 49.40% City Manager’s Office 799,380 858,146 827,767 901,097 901,097 5.01% Legal 967,920 987,321 933,472 944,591 944,591 -4.33% Economic Development 517,623 556,913 542,048 - - -100.00% Public Communications 673,230 716,455 707,223 691,556 691,556 -3.48% Human Resources 523,863 716,335 622,786 543,958 543,958 -24.06% TOTAL 4,061,646$ 4,422,812$ 4,254,268$ 3,620,497$ 3,674,203$ -16.93% EXPENDITURES BY CLASSIFICATION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Salaries & Benefits 3,450,988$ 3,528,140$ 3,445,460$ 3,060,466$ 3,107,040$ -11.94% Supplies 190,985 178,716 173,261 149,768 152,964 -14.41% Maintenance 6,480 19,865 35,775 2,935 2,935 -85.23% Purchased Services 401,441 677,527 569,772 377,328 381,264 -43.73% Capital Outlay 11,752 18,564 30,000 30,000 30,000 61.60% TOTAL 4,061,646$ 4,422,812$ 4,254,268$ 3,620,497$ 3,674,203$ -16.93% PERSONNEL Revised Approved Approved % Change in Actual Actual Budget Base Budget Budget Budget from FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Mayor & Council - - - - - N/A City Secretary’s Office 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.00% Internal Auditor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 100.00% City Manager’s Office 5.50 5.50 5.50 6.00 6.00 9.09% Legal 10.00 10.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 0.00% Economic Development** 7.00 7.00 6.50 - - -100.00% Community Programs* 1.00 - - - - N/A Public Communications 4.50 6.50 6.50 6.00 6.00 -7.69% Human Resources 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 0.00% TOTAL 40.00 41.00 39.50 33.00 34.00 -13.92% * The Community Programs Division merged with the Public Communications Division in FY10. ** The Economic Development Division was eliminated in FY12 and the function was reassigned to the City Manager's Division as part of a restructuring of the City's departmen Service Level Adjustments One-Time Recurring Total Mayor / Council One Year Removal of Travel / Training and Professional Services (14,000)$ -$ (14,000)$ City Secretary Codification Maintenance Costs - 13,275 13,275 Internal Auditor Internal Auditor Assistant 2,196 52,235 54,431 General Government SLA TOTAL (11,804)$ 65,510$ 53,706$ 101 GENERAL GOVERNMENT CITY SECRETARY Description & Budget Explanation: The City Secretary Department provides services to the citizens of College Station and administrative support to the City Council in fulfilling its duties and responsibilities. Program Name: Council Services Service Level:Provide coordination and timely administrative support to the Council and Mayor. Performance Measures FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Efficiency -No. of City-Wide Committee agendas 287 265 260 275 -No. of Council public activities 278 290 150 215 -No. of Mayor appointments & presentations 1,022 720 745 820 -No. of Council minutes prepared 58 50 60 60 Program Name: Public Records and Information Service Level:To maintain and provide public information in an efficient manner. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Efficiency -No. of birth and death records reported to State Health Dept. 1,862 2,055 1,950 2,050 -No. of birth certificate request processed 942 1,125 950 965 -No. of death certificate request processed. 2,290 2,455 2,250 2,200 -Median No. of days for open records request to be completed.6666 -No. of open records request received.175 115 215 180 -No. of Legal Notices Published 52 60 55 50 102 GENERAL GOVERNMENT PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Description & Budget Explanation: The Public Communications Division is responsible for the city's website, TV19, marketing, media relations and all external communications. Program Name: Public Information Function Service Level: Provide timely and accurate city information to residents, media and general public through all available delivery methods. Performance Measures FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Department Efficiency Internal satisfaction rate via annual survey N/A N/A N/A N/A Media Effectiveness Media satisfaction rate via annual survey 94.45% N/A 93% 93% Percentage of positive news coverage 23% 27% 30% 28% Percentage of neutral news coverage 67% 68% 57% 60% Percentage of negative news coverage 10% 5% 13% 12% Web Effectiveness Total page views 2,798,470 2,900,000 2,300,000 2,300,000 Total visitors 923,350 950,000 800,000 800,000 Returning visitors (loyalty)486,573 500,000 406,000 400,000 New visitors 436,777 450,000 394,000 400,000 Video Services Number of video elements produced 107 115 120 115 Value of produced video products $250,000 $115,000 $148,000 $150,000 Number of CDs/DVDs reproduced 500 500 360 400 103 Debt Service Fund The City’s basic debt management policies are explained in the Financial Policy Statements included in the appendix to this document. The City continues to review its debt management policies and to address the particular concerns and needs of the citizens. The City strives to issue debt only to meet capital needs. This fund is prepared on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Under this basis, revenues are recognized when they become measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. Expenditures are recognized when the related fund liability is incurred with the exception of several items. The full listing of these exceptions can be found in the Financial Policies on page F-1. State law in Texas sets the maximum ad valorem tax rate, including all obligations of the city, for a home rule city, such as College Station, at $2.50 per $100 valuation. The approved FY12 tax rate to finance general governmental services, including debt service, is 43.7995 cents per $100 of valuation. Current policy is to maintain at least 8.33% of annual appropriated expenditures and any associated fees as the Debt Service Fund balance at fiscal year end. The fund is in compliance with that policy. The most recent debt issued by the City of College Station has earned ratings* from Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s as shown below: Bond Type Standard & Poor's Moody's General Obligation AA Aa2 Utility Revenue A+ Aa2 Certificates of Obligation AA Aa2 Revenues in the Debt Service Fund are anticipated to decrease in FY12 by 3.8% from the FY11 revised budget. Ad valorem taxes are projected to decrease by 3.6% due to a reduction in the debt service portion of the tax rate. The transfers in from other funds are budgeted at $623,679. These transfers reflect debt that is paid for out of the debt service fund, but that is funded using resources from another source. Funds from the BVSWMA, Inc. (for the BVSWMA landfill debt) and the Hotel Tax Fund (for the convention center debt) will be transferred in to the Debt Service Fund for payment of the applicable debt service. The payment of this debt service is reflected as part of the Certificates of Obligation expenditures. The approved FY12 debt service portion of the tax rate is 20.1536 cents per $100 of valuation. Total revenues projected to pay on the City’s existing debt in FY12 are estimated to be $12,292,205. Total expenditures out of the Debt Service Fund are estimated to be $12,649,002. Of that total, expenditures on General Obligation Bonds are estimated at $9,176,313 and Certificates of Obligation at $3,452,689. An additional $20,000 is included for agent fees associated with issuing debt. In November 2003, the citizens of College Station approved $38,405,000 in future General Obligation Bond (GOB) authorization for streets, traffic, police and fire station projects, the City Center project, and parks projects including the second phase of Veterans Park. A small amount of the 03 GOB debt remains to be issued. In November of 2008, voters approved $76,950,000 in future GOB authorization for streets, traffic, a new fire station, the Library expansion project, and parks and recreation projects including an addition at the Lincoln Center and the Lick Creek Park Nature Center. In FY11, $1,960,000 in General Obligation debt was issued. In FY12, it is projected that $8,045,000 in General Obligation Bonds will be issued. Th ese funds are estimated be used as follows:  $4,730,000 for Street and Transportation projects  $600,000 for Traffic Signals projects  $2,715,000 for Parks and Recreation projects It is also anticipated that the City will issue $100,000 in Certificates of Obligation for General Government Capital projects. This amount is for the Fiber Optic Infrastructure project. Each year, an analysis is done to determine what resources are needed and if refunding and call options are available and in the best interest of the City. It is not known at this time whether refunding will be done in FY12. The following section contains a schedule of requirements and a summary of requirements for all General Obligation Bonds and Certificates of Obligation . The detailed information for each individual GOB and CO is found in Appendix H. The schedule of requirements and the individual detailed information for all Utility Revenue Bonds are also found in Appendix H. * The ratings are standard ratings of Moody’s and S&P. The highest rating available on S&P is AAA and the lowest “investment grade” debt issue is BBB. In contrast, Moody’s highest rating is Aaa and the lowest “investment grade" is Bbb. 104 City of College Station Debt Service Fund Summary 10/25/11 1:09 PM FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 % Change in FY10 Revised Year-End Approved Approved Budget from Actual Budget Estimate Base Budget Budget FY11-FY12 Beginning Fund Balance 3,901,210$ 4,119,966$ 4,119,966$ 4,569,410$ 4,569,410$ REVENUES Ad Valorem Taxes 12,191,613$ 12,058,136$ 12,058,136$ 11,623,526$ 11,623,526$ -3.60% Investment Earnings 51,826 100,000 40,000 45,000 45,000 -55.00% Other 30 - - - - N/A Transfers 223,615 617,938 222,519 623,679 623,679 0.93% Proceeds/Long Term Debt 4,340,183 - 12,372,070 - - N/A Total Revenues 16,807,267$ 12,776,074$ 24,692,725$ 12,292,205$ 12,292,205$ -3.79% Total Funds Available 20,708,477$ 16,896,040$ 28,812,691$ 16,861,615$ 16,861,615$ -0.20% EXPENDITURES & TRANSFERS General Obligation Bonds 6,629,105$ 8,142,338$ 8,142,338$ 9,176,313$ 9,176,313$ 12.70% Certificates of Obligation 5,554,528 4,036,928 3,641,512 3,452,689 3,452,689 -14.47% Agent Fees, Other Costs 104,757 25,900 55,672 20,000 20,000 -22.78% Advance Refunding 4,283,647 376,792 12,403,760 - - -100.00% Total Operating Expenses/Transfers 16,572,037$ 12,581,958$ 24,243,281$ 12,649,002$ 12,649,002$ 0.53% Increase in Fund Balance 235,230$ 194,116$ 449,444$ (356,797)$ (356,797)$ Measurement Focus Adjustment (16,474) Ending Fund Balance 4,119,966$ 4,314,082$ 4,569,410$ 4,212,613$ 4,212,613$ Debt Service Fund ‐Sources Debt Service Fund ‐Uses Ad Valorem  Taxes 94.56% Investment  Earnings  0.37% Transfers  5.07% General  Obligation  Bonds  72.55% Certificates of  Obligation  27.30% Agent Fees,  Other Costs  0.16% 105 DEBT SERVICE SUMMARY OF REQUIREMENTS CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION & GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS ALL SERIES FY 2011-2012 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS ISSUE - PRINCIPAL GENERAL DEBT ASSOCIATED PARKING ENTERPRISE ASSOCIATED ELECTRIC FUND ASSOCIATED WATER FUND ASSOCIATED WASTE WATER FUND ASSOCIATED TOTAL G.O. Series 2002 300,000 - - - - 300,000 G.O. Series 2003 225,000 - - - - 225,000 G.O. Series 2004 1,135,000 - - - - 1,135,000 G.O. Series 2005 205,000 - - - - 205,000 G.O. Series 2006 250,000 - - - - 250,000 G.O. Series 2006 Refunding 1,370,000 - - - - 1,370,000 G.O. Series 2007 100,000 - - - - 100,000 G.O. Series 2008 290,000 - - - - 290,000 G.O. Series 2009 110,000 - - - - 110,000 G.O. Series 2009 Refunding 420,000 380,000 - - - 800,000 G.O. Series 2010 635,000 - - - - 635,000 G.O. Series 2010 Refunding 445,000 - 75,000 760,000 730,000 2,010,000 G.O. Series 2011 (estimated) 750,000 - - - - 750,000 TOTAL PRINCIPAL 6,235,000$ 380,000$ 75,000$ 760,000$ 730,000$ 8,180,000$ ISSUE - INTEREST G.O. Series 2002 6,750 - - - - 6,750 G.O. Series 2003 122,475 - - - - 122,475 G.O. Series 2004 274,108 - - - - 274,108 G.O. Series 2005 174,563 - - - - 174,563 G.O. Series 2006 254,294 - - - - 254,294 G.O. Series 2006 Refunding 383,450 - - - - 383,450 C.O. Series 2007 112,331 - - - - 112,331 G.O. Series 2008 324,069 - - - - 324,069 G.O. Series 2009 125,283 - - - - 125,283 G.O. Series 2009 Refunding 93,650 84,000 - - - 177,650 G.O. Series 2010 535,656 - - - - 535,656 G.O. Series 2010 Refunding 472,425 - 119,875 504,400 436,650 1,533,350 G.O. Series 2011 (estimated)62,260 - - - - 62,260 TOTAL INTEREST 2,941,313$ 84,000$ 119,875$ 504,400$ 436,650$ 4,086,238$ TOTAL PAYMENT 9,176,313$ 464,000$ 1 194,875$ 1 1,264,400$ 1 1,166,650$ 1 12,266,238$ 1. The bonds for the projects in these funds were originally issued as Certificates of Obligation (CO's). When the CO's were refunded, all refunded bonds were reissued as General Obligation Bonds as a cost saving measure. To have reissued as both General Obligation Bonds and CO bonds would have resulted in increased debt issuance costs. CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION BONDS ISSUE - PRINCIPAL GENERAL DEBT ASSOCIATED ELECTRIC FUND ASSOCIATED WATER FUND ASSOCIATED WASTE WATER FUND ASSOCIATED NEW MUNICIPAL CEMETERY ASSOCIATED CONVENTION CENTER ASSOCIATED BVSWMA ASSOCIATED TOTAL C.O. Series 2002 600,000 - - - - - - 600,000 C.O. Series 2003A 35,000 - - - - - - 35,000 C.O. Series 2004 - 215,000 - 185,000 - - - 400,000 C.O. Series 2005 135,000 - - - 60,000 - - 195,000 C.O. Series 2006 245,000 - - - 100,000 - - 345,000 C.O. Series 2007 85,000 - - - 20,000 - - 105,000 C.O. Series 2008 115,000 235,000 240,000 75,000 235,000 - - 900,000 C.O. Series 2009 150,000 485,000 290,000 - 20,000 105,000 215,000 1,265,000 C.O. Series 2010 70,000 85,000 - 10,000 - - - 165,000 C.O. Series 2011 (estimated)15,000 170,000 - 110,000 - - - 295,000 TOTAL PRINCIPAL 1,450,000$ 1,190,000$ 530,000$ 380,000$ 435,000$ 105,000$ 215,000$ 4,305,000$ ISSUE - INTEREST C.O. Series 2002 13,500 - - - - - - 13,500 C.O. Series 2003A 20,828 - - - - - - 20,828 C.O. Series 2004 - 158,776 - 134,875 - - - 293,651 C.O. Series 2005 109,049 - - - 9,276 - - 118,325 C.O. Series 2006 248,219 - - - 22,812 - - 271,031 C.O. Series 2007 88,505 - - - 24,626 - - 113,131 C.O. Series 2008 97,836 256,339 263,704 84,166 258,063 - - 960,108 C. O. Series 2009 21,600 439,074 274,391 - 20,215 119,444 184,235 1,058,959 C. O. Series 2010 9,213 70,481 - 8,300 - - - 87,994 C.O. Series 2011 (estimated)268 189,571 - 123,899 - - - 313,738 TOTAL INTEREST 609,018$ 1,114,241$ 538,095$ 351,240$ 334,992$ 119,444$ 184,235$ 3,251,264$ TOTAL PAYMENT 2,059,018$ 1 2,304,241$ 2 1,068,095$ 2 731,240$ 2 769,992$ 1 224,444$ 3 399,235$ 4 7,556,264$ 1. This portion of the CO debt will be paid put of the Debt Service Fund. 2. The Utility portion of the CO debt will be paid directly out of the Utility fund with which the debt is associated. 3. Convention Center associated debt will be paid out of the Debt Service Fund, but funds for the debt service payment will be transferred into the Debt Service Fund from the Hotel Tax Fund. 4. Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency (BVSWMA) associated debt will be paid out of the Debt Service Fund, but funds for the debt service payment will be transferred into the Debt Service Fund from BVSWMA, Inc. 106 FISCAL YEAR PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL DUE EACH YEAR PRINCIPAL OUTSTANDING AS OF OCTOBER 1 FY 12 8,180,000 4,086,237 12,266,237 106,710,000 FY 13 8,495,000 3,785,137 12,280,137 98,530,000 FY 14 8,495,000 3,459,953 11,954,953 90,035,000 FY 15 8,655,000 3,129,421 11,784,421 81,540,000 FY 16 8,685,000 2,777,656 11,462,656 72,885,000 FY 17 9,135,000 2,398,039 11,533,039 64,200,000 FY 18 8,245,000 2,025,204 10,270,204 55,065,000 FY 19 7,520,000 1,697,643 9,217,643 46,820,000 FY 20 7,860,000 1,395,265 9,255,265 39,300,000 FY 21 6,635,000 1,108,354 7,743,354 31,440,000 FY 22 4,465,000 887,891 5,352,891 24,805,000 FY 23 3,605,000 726,563 4,331,563 20,340,000 FY 24 3,400,000 584,986 3,984,986 16,735,000 FY 25 3,035,000 454,708 3,489,708 13,335,000 FY 26 2,750,000 338,678 3,088,678 10,300,000 FY 27 2,310,000 239,231 2,549,231 7,550,000 FY 28 2,195,000 152,231 2,347,231 5,240,000 FY 29 1,620,000 79,720 1,699,720 3,045,000 FY 30 1,425,000 24,938 1,449,938 1,425,000 FY 31 0 0 0 0 ALL SERIES GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS DEBT SERVICE 0 2,000,000 4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 14,000,000 FY 12FY 14FY 16FY 18FY 20FY 22FY 24FY 26FY 28FY 30G.O.B. PRINCIPAL & INTEREST PRINCIPAL INTEREST 107 FISCAL YEAR PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL DUE ANNUALLY PRINCIPAL OUTSTANDING AS OF OCTOBER 1 FY 12 4,305,000 3,251,264 7,556,264 80,450,000 FY 13 3,845,000 3,141,143 6,986,143 76,145,000 FY 14 4,025,000 3,001,679 7,026,679 72,300,000 FY 15 4,225,000 2,852,091 7,077,091 68,275,000 FY 16 4,330,000 2,689,478 7,019,478 64,050,000 FY 17 3,945,000 2,523,751 6,468,751 59,720,000 FY 18 4,050,000 2,363,051 6,413,051 55,775,000 FY 19 4,265,000 2,197,166 6,462,166 51,725,000 FY 20 4,470,000 2,017,994 6,487,994 47,460,000 FY 21 4,700,000 1,826,431 6,526,431 42,990,000 FY 22 4,940,000 1,622,757 6,562,757 38,290,000 FY 23 5,190,000 1,405,939 6,595,939 33,350,000 FY 24 5,400,000 1,174,994 6,574,994 28,160,000 FY 25 4,975,000 940,041 5,915,041 22,760,000 FY 26 4,935,000 713,741 5,648,741 17,785,000 FY 27 4,635,000 498,819 5,133,819 12,850,000 FY 28 4,620,000 290,299 4,910,299 8,215,000 FY 29 2,825,000 122,483 2,947,483 3,595,000 FY 30 770,000 42,600 812,600 770,000 FY 31 585,000 13,163 598,163 0 ALL SERIES CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS DEBT SERVICE 0 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 7,000,000 8,000,000 FY 12FY 14FY 16FY 18FY 20FY 22FY 24FY 26FY 28FY 30C.O. PRINCIPAL & INTEREST PRINCIPAL INTEREST 108 Economic Development Fund The Economic Development Fund is utilized to account for funds that are to be used for business attraction and retention. This fund is prepared on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Using this method, revenues are recognized when they become measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. Expenditures are recognized when the related fund liability is incurred with the exception of several items. The full listing of these exceptions can be found in the Financial Policies in the Appendix. Revenues for the Economic Development Fund are collected from the General Fund and the Business Park Fund. Due to current economic conditions affecting the City’s General Fund, the transfer from the General Fund to the Economic Development Fund for FY12 has been reduced from $200,000 to $150,000. FY12 approved total transfers in to the fund total $307,150. Investment earnings of approximately $16,000 are also included for FY12. The Economic Development Fund expenditures are comprised of “Cash Assistance” payments to various business prospects. This assistance is aimed at providing prospective businesses with start-up resources and provides existing businesses the opportunity to expand operations. $398,900 is available in the FY12 Approved Budget for cash assistance. Expenditures of $250,000 will be used for Research Valley Partnership Texas A&M Institute for Pre-Clinical Studies (TIPS), $93,900 will be available for Northgate Radakor, and $55,000 will be available for other economic development prospects. If uncommitted at year-end, these funds will contribute to the fund balance carried over from year to year. This flexibility allows the City to recruit new and existing business, and ensures that College Station has a diverse and vibrant economy. Also included in the FY12 approved expenditure budget is $4,554 is included for maintenance expenditures related to the First Street property in the Northgate District, a $250,000 transfer to the Electric Fund, and $75,000 in SLA funding for an economic development plan study. Total approved expenditures for FY12 are $728,454. The FY12 estimated ending working capital is anticipated to decrease 53% when compared to the FY11 estimated ending working capital. This is due, in part, to the $250,000 one-time transfer to the Electric Fund to repay the utility for contributions that have been made to the Economic Development fund in prior years. Additionally, fund balance is decreased by the removal of $45,000 in transfers from the various utilities in FY12. Organization FY11 Year End Est FY12 Approved RVP TIPS 250,000 250,000 Northgate Radakor 300,000 93,900 Other 55,000 55,000 Total $605,000 $398,900 Economic Development Cash Assistance 109 City of College Station Economic Development Fund Fund Summary 11/4/2011 13:11 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 % Change in FY10 Revised Year-End Approved Approved Budget from Actual Budget Estimate Base Budget Budget FY11 to FY12 BEGINNING BALANCE 1,133,823$ 1,754,418$ 1,754,418$ 783,668$ 783,668$ REVENUES Operating transfers General Fund 315,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ -25.00% Water Fund 12,500 12,500 12,500 - - -100.00% Wastewater Fund 20,000 20,000 20,000 - - -100.00% Sanitation Fund 12,500 12,500 12,500 - - -100.00% Business Park Fund 250,000 250,000 250,000 112,150 112,150 -55.14% Investment Earnings 16,773 20,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 -20.00% Other Revenues 50,000 - - - - N/A Total Revenues 676,773$ 515,000$ 511,000$ 278,150$ 278,150$ -45.99% Total Funds Available 1,810,596$ 2,269,418$ 2,265,418$ 1,061,818$ 1,061,818$ -53.21% EXPENDITURES & TRANSFERS Cash Assistance 40,000$ 605,000$ 605,000$ 398,900$ 398,900$ -34.07% Professional Services - 245,539 245,539 - 75,000 -69.45% Transfers Out - - - 250,000 250,000 N/A Other 7,242 631,211 631,211 4,554 4,554 -99.28% Total Operating Expenses & Xfers 47,242 1,481,750 1,481,750$ 653,454$ 728,454$ -50.84% Increase/Decrease in Fund Balance 629,531$ (966,750)$ (970,750)$ (375,304)$ (450,304)$ -53.42% Measurement Focus Adjustment (8,936) Ending Fund Balance 1,754,418$ 787,668$ 783,668$ 408,364$ 333,364$ General Fund 57% Business Park Fund 43% Economic Development Fund -Sources Cash Assistance 55% Professional Services 10% Transfers Out 34% Other 1% Economic Development Fund -Uses 110 City of College Station Efficiency Time Payment Fee Fund Summary FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 % Change in FY10 Revised Year-End Approved Approved Budget from Actual Budget Estimate Base Budget Budget FY11 to FY12 Beginning Fund Balance 34,519$ 33,136$ 33,136$ 41,120$ 41,120$ REVENUES Efficiency Time Payment Fees 8,142$ 8,000$ 7,782$ 7,750$ 7,750$ -3.13% Interest Earnings 293 363 202 212 212 -41.57% Total Revenues 8,435$ 8,363$ 7,984$ 7,962$ 7,962$ -4.79% Total Funds Available 42,954$ 41,499$ 41,120$ 49,082$ 49,082$ EXPENDITURES General & Administrative Transfer 9,685$ -$ -$ -$ -$ N/A Total Expenditures 9,685$ -$ -$ -$ -$ N/A Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance (1,250)$ 8,363$ 7,984$ 7,962$ 7,962$ -4.79% Measurement Focus Adjustment (133)$ Ending Fund Balance 33,136$ 41,499$ 41,120$ 49,082$ 49,082$ Efficiency Time Payment Fees Efficiency Time Payment  Fund ‐Sources Efficiency Time Payment Fees 97% Interest Earnings 3% The Efficiency Time Payment Fee can be used for the purpose of improving the efficiency of the administration of justice in College Station. Approved revenues in FY12 total $7,962. There are no approved expenditures in FY12 for this fund. The FY12 estimated ending fund balance is anticipated to increase 19% when compared to the FY11 estimated ending fund balance. The expected increase in fund balance is due to the fee collection and investment earning revenue estimated to be received in the fund in FY12. 111 Brazos Valley  Solid Waste  Management Agency Fund  In FY10, the City of College Station and City of Bryan set up a corporation, Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency, Inc. (BVSWMA, Inc.), to take over the operations of the landfill. As part of this organization the City of College Station will continue to have landfill employees who will, through an agreement with BVSWMA, Inc., provide landfill services. The BVSWMA, Inc. portion of the budget accounted for in the City of College Station budget is the salary and benefits of the College Station landfill employees. These expenses will be reimbursed by BVSWMA, Inc. each year. As vacancies in these positions occur, the positions will become employees of BVSWMA, Inc. FY12 approved expenditures total $1,393,401. 112 City of College Station Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency (BVSWMA) Fund Fund Summary FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 % Change in FY10 Revised Year-End Approved Approved Budget from Actual Budget Estimate Base Budget Budget FY11 To FY12 REVENUES BVSWMA, Inc. Charges -$ 1,442,276$ 1,442,276$ 1,393,401$ 1,393,401$ -3.39% Landfill Charges 6,752,565 - - - - N/A Other Sales - Methane Gas 705 - - - - N/A Investment Earnings 30,787 - - - - N/A Intergovernmental 55,451 - - - N/A Other (77,367) - - - - N/A Total Revenues 6,762,141$ 1,442,276$ 1,442,276$ 1,393,401$ 1,393,401$ -3.39% EXPENDITURES AND TRANSFERS Landfill Operations 4,068,746$ 1,354,258$ 1,354,258$ 1,304,698$ 1,304,698$ -3.66% Administration 318,918 88,018 88,018 75,937 75,937 -13.73% Pay Plan Contingency - - - 12,766 12,766 N/A Total Operating Expenditures & Transfers 4,387,664$ 1,442,276$ 1,442,276$ 1,393,401$ 1,393,401$ NONOPERATING EXPENDITURES General Capital 5,904,740 - - - - Host Fees 145,135 - - - - N/A Intergovernmental 199,065 - - - - N/A Debt Service 249,768 - - - - N/A Other 1,210 - - - - N/A General & Administrative Transfers 260,370 - - - - N/A Total Non-Operating Expenditures 6,760,288$ -$ -$ -$ -$ N/A Total Operating & Non Operating Expenditures 11,147,952 1,442,276 1,442,276 1,393,401 1,393,401 Increase (Decrease) in Working Capital, Modified Accrual Basis of Accounting $ (4,385,811) $ - $ - $ - $ - Measurement Focus Adjustment (765,053)$ Beginning Working Capital, Accrual Basis of Accounting $ 5,150,864 $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Working Capital, Accrual Basis of Accounting $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - BVSWMA, Inc. Charges 100% BVSWMA Fund -Sources Landfill Operations 94% Administration 5%Pay Plan Contingency 1% BVSWMA Fund -Uses 113 City of College Station Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency (BVSWMA) Fund Operations & Maintenance Summary EXPENDITURE BY DIVISION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Landfill Operations -$ 1,354,258$ 1,354,258$ 1,304,698$ 1,304,698$ -3.66% Administration - 88,018 88,018 75,937 75,937 -13.73% TOTAL -$ 1,442,276$ 1,442,276$ 1,380,635$ 1,380,635$ -4.27% EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Salaries & Benefits -$ 1,442,276$ 1,442,276$ 1,380,635$ 1,380,635$ -4.27% Supplies - - - - - N/A Maintenance - - - - - N/A Purchased Services - - - - - N/A General Capital - - - - - N/A TOTAL -$ 1,442,276$ 1,442,276$ 1,380,635$ 1,380,635$ -4.27% PERSONNEL SUMMARY BY ACTIVITY Revised Approved Approved % Change in Actual Actual Budget Base Budget Budget Budget from FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Landfill Operations 24.50 24.50 24.00 21.00 21.00 -12.50% Administration 2.75 2.75 2.50 1.00 1.00 -60.00% TOTAL 27.25 27.25 24.00 22.00 22.00 -8.33% 114 Governmental  Capital Improvement Project Budgets  On an annual basis, the City of College Station prepares a five-year Capital Improvements Program (CIP). The CIP is presented for City Council review as part of the annual budget process. The program consolidates all anticipated capital needs for which funding authorization exists. The program is divided into several sections depending on the services provided and the funding source. Two categories of capital expenditures are defined by the City. The first category of capital expenditure is for major capital projects. Major capital projects are projects that cost more than $50,000 and provide a fixed asset or equipment that has a useful life of three years or more. The second category of capital expenditure is for minor capital projects. Minor capital projects are projects that cost more than $5,000 and less than $50,000 and provide a fixed asset or equipment that has a useful life of three years or more. The City only has legal authority to issue General Obligation (GO) debt after a successful citizen referendum. GO debt is debt that obligates the City to repay the issue with ad valorem tax revenues. The City uses GO debt for the acquisition and development of parks and recreation facilities; rights-of-way acquisition; construction and reconstruction of streets; and for public buildings such as City offices, libraries, fire stations and other general use facilities. The most recent General Obligation bond election was held in November of 2008. Voters approved $76,950,000 in General Obligation Bond (GOB) authorization to be issued over 7 years for streets, traffic, and fire station projects, the Library expansion project, and parks projects including an addition at the Lincoln Center and the Lick Creek Park Nature Center. In November 2003, the citizens of College Station approved $38,405,000 in GOB authorization for street, traffic, police and fire station projects, the City Center project, and parks projects including the second phase of Veterans Park. A small amount of the 03 GOB debt remains to be issued. In FY11, the City issued $1,960,000 in GOB debt for various General Government capital projects. Of this, $700,000 was issued for street, traffic and sidewalk projects. This includes $100,000 for sidewalk improvements. It is anticipated that these funds will be used for the construction of sidewalks along Lincoln Avenue. $400,000 was included for the Barron Road East/Lakeway project. $50,000 was issued for the Rock Prairie Road West right-of-way project. In addition, $150,000 was issued for the Lick Creek Hike and Bike Trail project. $1,260,000 was issued for Parks and Recreation projects. This includes $100,000 for the master planning related to the Lick Creek Nature Center and $380,000 for various neighborhood park improvements. Also included was $780,000 for the replacement of the concession and restroom complex at Central Park. The FY12 Approved Budget includes the projected issuance of $8,045,000 in GO’s. Included is $5,330,000 for street, sidewalk, traffic and transportation projects. This includes $440,000 for street oversize participation projects. These funds will be used toward building increased capacity into the streets that are being constructed by developers. $500,000 is projected to be used toward the construction of the Jones Butler extension. This project includes the design and construction of a major collector from the intersection of Luther Street & Jones-Butler to the intersection of George Bush & Penberthy Road. An additional $600,000 has been included for new traffic signal projects throughout the City. An estimated $500,000 is projected to be issued for the design of the Health Science Center Parkway. These funds will come from the authorization related to the Barron Road Widening Phase II project. The Barron Road Widening Phase II project is under construction and is anticipated to come in well below the amount authorized through the GOB. The remaining Barron Road Widening Phase II authorization in the amount of $990,000 has been projected to be issued in FY12 for other street improvement projects. Included in this is $567,000 for the Rock Prairie Road Bridge Widening project that was added in FY11. $700,000 is projected for the Barron Road East/Lakeway project which will extend Barron Road from State Highway 6 east at the existing Barron Road to a future intersection with the extension of Lakeway Drive. An estimated $200,000 is projected to be issued for sidewalk projects to be constructed in FY12. The specific projects on which these funds will be used are in the process of being identified. $250,000 is estimated to be issued for the Rock Prairie Road West right-of-way project. This project is for the purchase of additional right-of-way from State Highway 6 to Normand Drive to provide for the future widening of that section of Rock Prairie Road. It is estimated that $450,000 will be issued for the design work related to the Lick Creek Hike and Bike Trail. Finally, $700,000 is projected for the University Drive Pedestrian Improvement Phase II-IV project. This project consists of implementing the remaining phases (2 through 5) of the pedestrian improvements on University Drive. The project is to improve pedestrian travel in the Northgate area of College Station, especially to facilitate pedestrian movement across and along University Drive between Boyett Street and South College Avenue. GOB debt in the amount of $2,715,000 is projected for Parks and Recreation projects. $220,000 is included for the purchase of land for neighborhood parks. $100,000 is estimated to be issued for the completion of the Lick Creek Trail. This park 115 project is for construction of a compacted gravel trail over the existing dirt trail in Lick Creek Park. $1,645,000 has been projected for the East District Maintenance Shop Replacement. These funds will be used to replace the existing shop. Finally, $750,000 is included for design and construction work on the Lick Creek Nature Center. The City has statutory authority, and City Council policy allows for the use of non-voter authorized debt instruments such as certificates of obligation and contract obligations (generally referred to as CO's). City Council policy allows the City to use such instruments for capital items such as the following:  The purchase and replacement of major computer systems and other technology-based items that have useful lives of not more than ten years.  The purchase and replacement of major equipment items such as fire-fighting equipment. The City has, however, developed policies and procedures to provide almost all of this equipment without issuing debt.  The purchase of land and development of land for economic development uses.  Over the past 4 years, at the recommendation of the City’s financial advisors, the City has issued CO’s in lieu of Utility Revenue Bonds, for the Electric, Water and Wastewater utilities. In FY11, the City did not issue any CO debt for General Government projects. $7,835,000 in CO debt was issued in FY11 for Utility projects. Prior to FY08, Utility Revenue Bond debt had been used for the Utility projects. However, based on the recommendations from the City’s financial advisors, and due to the marketability of the bonds as well as the volatility of the bond market, CO debt has been issued for utility projects from FY08 forward. $4,735,000 was issued for Electric projects and $3,100,000 for Wastewater projects. In addition, $100,000 was issued to cover debt issuance costs. The FY12 Approved Budget includes the issuance of $100,000 in CO debt for General Government projects. This amount will be used for the Fiber Optic Infrastructure project. This project will support the installation of fiber optic cable to continue expansion of the city's network to new buildings and facilities, and to permit the connection of existing facilities that are not currently on the network. It is anticipated that Certificates of Obligation will be issued in FY12 for Utility capital projects. Funds in the amount of $6,100,000 are estimated for Water capital projects and funds in the amount of $7,580,000 are estimated for Wastewater capital projects, and funds in the amount of $8,825,000 are estimated for Electric capital projects. GOVERNMENTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS   Below are descriptions of the governmental capital projects included in the FY12 Approved Budget. The funds expended on these projects are considered significant and nonroutine. STREETS, TRAFFIC, SIDEWALKS AND TRAIL CAPITAL PROJECTS  Street Rehabilitation Projects  In FY12, funds in the amount of $145,384 are included for the Tauber and Stasney Rehabilitation project. These streets are located in the Northgate area. The project includes the rehabilitation of Tauber Street and Stasney Street from University Drive to Cherry Street as well as the design and construction of new sidewalks on College Main. The project also includes the water and wastewater line rehabilitation. The majority of the construction on these streets should be complete in FY11, but the FY12 estimate reflects remaining expenditures. Other rehabilitation projects estimated for FY12 include the Bird Pond Rehabilitation project. This project is for the rehabilitation of Bird Pond Road from the city limits to Rock Prairie Road. Funding for this project will come from the authorization related to the Barron Road Widening Phase II project. The Barron Road Widening Phase II project is under construction and is anticipated to come in well below the amount authorized through the GOB. An additional rehabilitation project included in the FY12 Approved Budget is the Cooner Street Rehabilitation project. This project includes the rehabilitation of paving and water and wastewater lines along Cooner Street. The project may include concrete pavement, curb, gutter, storm drainage and sidewalks. The majority of the funding for the Streets component of this project will be from Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. $1,075,634 of the $1,203,000 Streets budget will be funded with CDBG funds. The balance of the budget will come from Barron Road Widening Phase II authorization. Street Extension Projects  $5,302,598 is the estimated expenditure included for various street extension and widening projects. Included in this is $572,611 for Oversize Participation (OP) projects that may arise throughout the fiscal year. These funds are used for building increased capacity into the streets that are being constructed by developers. Of this amount, $472,611 is from OP 116 funds authorized as part of the 2003 GOB. An additional $100,000 of OP funds is budgeted and reflects assessments expected to be received as a result of the Holleman Extension project. It is estimated that $500,000 in assessments will be received over the next five years as the area adjacent to Holleman Drive develops. As a significant portion of the Holleman Extension project budget was funded using OP funds, the received assessments will be earmarked for future OP projects. These funds will not be available for expenditure until they are received. Other street extension projects include the extension of Victoria Avenue. It is estimated that $316,519 will be spent in FY12 to extend Victoria Avenue from Southern Plantation Drive to connect with William D. Fitch Parkway (SH40), aligning with the existing Victoria Avenue on the south side of William D. Fitch Parkway (SH40). The roadway will be a major collector consisting of two travel lanes and a center turn lane with bike lanes, sidewalks, landscaping and storm drainage. Water and wastewater upgrades will also be made as part of this project. The project is being completed in advance of the new College Station ISD (CSISD) high school, which is expected to open in August of 2012. An estimated $575,692 is projected for the extension of Jones-Butler Drive. This project includes the design and construction of a major collector from the intersection of Luther Street & Jones-Butler to the intersection of George Bush & Penberthy Road. The project will also include sidewalks, bike lanes and an equestrian crossing. $500,000 is projected in FY12 for the design of the Health Science Center Parkway. This project is a component of the Bio-Medical Corridor agreement. The budget also includes an estimated FY12 expenditure of $931,684 for the Rock Prairie Road East Widening project. These funds will be used for design and right-of-way acquisition costs related to the future widening of Rock Prairie Road. Construction funds are not included in the project budget. $266,379 is the projected FY12 expenditure for the Rock Prairie Road West right-of-way project. This project includes the purchase of additional right-of-way from State Highway 6 to Normand Drive to provide for the future widening of that section of Rock Prairie Road. Funds have also been estimated for the design of the Rock Prairie Road Bridge Widening project. This project was added in late FY11. The City of College Station will design the bridge widening and TxDOT will construct the project. The bridge will be widened to six lanes with U-turn lanes constructed at the north and south ends of the existing bridge. The project will also include sidewalks and bike lanes or a multi-use path. In addition, acceleration/deceleration lanes will be added along the frontage roads. The design will be paid for by the City of College Station using the remaining unallocated Barron Road Widening Phase II authorization (2008 GOB). The construction will be paid for by TxDOT using Proposition 12 funds received from the State that must be used on bridges and overpasses. Design began late FY11 with construction estimated to begin in FY13. In addition, $1,125,429 is the estimated FY12 expenditure for the phase II of construction to Barron Road from Decatur Drive to William D. Fitch Parkway (SH40). This project will widen Barron Road from Decatur Drive to Barron Cutoff Road on the southwest side of William D. Fitch Parkway (SH40). The existing Barron Road is a two lane rural road. Upon completion of this project, Barron Road will be expanded to a divided four lane minor arterial roadway with medians, bicycle lanes and sidewalks. In addition, new traffic signals will be installed at the intersection of Barron Road and Victoria Avenue and at Barron Road and William D. Fitch Parkway (SH40). This project is anticipated to be completed in advance of the opening of the new CSISD high school in August of 2012. Finally, $710,000 is included for design work on the Barron Road East/Lakeway extension project. This project will extend Barron Road from State Highway 6 east at the existing Barron Road to a future intersection with the extension of Lakeway Drive. The Barron Road extension will be combined with the Lakeway Drive extension. Street TxDOT Projects  Projected expenditures include $91,562 for the Wellborn Widening Reimbursement project. As part of an AFA with TxDOT, the City is required to reimburse 10% of the right-of-way costs associated with the Wellborn Widening project. The majority of the reimbursement was paid in prior years, but it is anticipated that a final payment will need to be made in FY12. Traffic Projects  The FY12 Approved Budget includes an estimated $842,574 for traffic projects throughout the City. Funds are included for a new traffic signal at the intersection of Wellborn and F&B and a signal at the intersection of State Highway 30 and Copperfield. In addition, $65,000 is included for the design of a signal at FM 2818 and FM 60. $23,790 is included for traffic system safety improvement projects and $32,536 is included for traffic signal communication projects. These projects support traffic signal connectivity as well as other City data and voice services.   Sidewalk and Trail Projects  The City of College Station has worked over the years to ensure adequate transportation infrastructure is constructed for pedestrians and bicyclists. The City has an adopted Bicycle, Pedestrian and Greenways Master Plan. In FY12, $200,000 is included for sidewalk improvement projects throughout the City. The specific projects on which these funds will be used are in the process of being identified. $224,000 is estimated to be spent on Phase II of the Hike and Bike Trail Completion 117 project. This project will continue the 10' wide multi-use trail from Welsh Avenue to the Campus Village trail to the west. The trail will also be extended from the northern connection of the Campus Village Trail through Southwest Park as part of the Southwest Park development, providing continuity of the hike & bike trail system from Texas Avenue to Southwest Parkway. In addition, $508,000 is projected to be used toward the design of the Lick Creek Hike and Bike Trail. This project is for the construction of approximately three miles of hike and bike trails along Lick Creek between Westfield Park and Lick Creek Park. The trails will connect residential neighborhoods and CSISD property. An estimated $679,500 will be spent toward the design of Phase II of the University Drive Pedestrian Improvements project. This project consists of implementing the remaining phases (2 through 5) of the Pedestrian Improvements on University Drive. The project is designed to improve pedestrian travel in the Northgate area of College Station, especially to facilitate pedestrian movement across and along University Drive between Boyett Street and South College Avenue. Finally, funds in the amount of $637,000 are estimated for the construction of the College Main Plaza Improvements. This project is for the construction of a pedestrian plaza with bike lane from University Drive to Patricia Street. In addition, intersection improvements will be made along Lodge Street and Patricia Street. Funding for this project will come from several sources. A portion will come from the balance of the Discovery Drive project, which is complete and came in under budget. The balance of the budget will come from Certificates of Obligation (CO’s) issued in prior years for the Police Station Improvements project ($208,707) and the completion of the 2nd floor of the Municipal Court building ($18,376). Use of these funds is limited to certain types of projects, but they may be used for the College Main Plaza Improvements project. PARKS AND RECREATION CAPITAL PROJECTS  In FY12, expenditures in the amount of $2,271,230 are estimated for Parks and Recreation capital improvement projects. Included is $68,384 for field redevelopment projects. A portion of the funds will be used for replacement and repairs to numerous athletic facilities and parks throughout the City. The funds for these projects are collected from the fees paid by players and teams from both City leagues and outside user groups. The funds are used to pay for replacement items and facility upgrades at City athletic facilities. $81,696 is the estimated expenditure for improvements at University Park. This project will consist of the addition of 14 parking spaces to the existing parking lot. Also included in the project is the addition of a landscape island, sidewalks, curb and gutter, and relocation of the irrigation system, as needed. Funds in the amount of $293,843 are estimated for the purchase of park land throughout the City as part of the Neighborhood Parks Revolving Fund project. These funds are used for acquiring properties for neighborhood parks in advance of development. $792,307 is included for improvements at Stephen C. Beachy Central Park. These include the construction of a new concession complex and restroom building. An estimated $100,000 is included for the Lick Creek Park Iron Bridge Trail Completion. This project is for the construction of a compacted gravel trail over the existing dirt trail in Lick Creek Park. $198,000 has been included for the design of the East District Maintenance Shop Replacement. These funds will be used to replace the existing shop. Finally, funds are included for the detailed design of the Lick Creek Nature Center. This center, proposed to be built at Lick Creek Park, will serve as a nature center for visitors who want to learn more about the park. GENERAL GOVERNMENT AND CAPITAL EQUIPMENT CAPITAL PROJECTS  General government and capital equipment projects are planned assets that have value to more than one specific area of City operations. The two main divisions within this category are public facilities and technology projects. Estimated expenditures for public facility projects in FY12 include $6,349,265 for the construction of Fire Station #6. Fire Station #6 will serve the busy University Drive corridor. Construction is expected to be completed in FY12. In addition, $599,000 is included in the budget for the purchase and installation of a Fire Emergency Response Alerting System. This system will replace the fire station alerting system and the PA systems in stations 1, 2 and 4. A portion of the funding for this system will come from the balance of budget remaining from the Fire Station #3 Relocation project. Certificates of Obligation in the amount of $239,409 remain and may be used toward this project. The additional needed budget will come from the balance of the Radio System Replacement project, which is complete and came in under budget. The budget for the Radio System Replacement project was a combination of CO debt and Equipment Replacement Funds. Finally, $20,000 is included for the purchase of library books. The funds for the purchase of these books come from donations collected for this purpose. The FY12 Approved Budget also includes a projected expenditure of $832,000 for technology projects. Included is $300,000 for the replacement of the City’s Mobile Data Terminal system. This project is for the replacement of the electronic equipment that provides the interface between the radio frequency system (800 MHz radio system) and the Internet Protocol system (Computer Aided Dispatch). The goal of the project is to provide a public safety radio system that meets current and anticipated needs. $122,500 is projected for the Fiber Optic Infrastructure project. This project will support the installation of fiber optic cable to continue expansion of the city's network to new buildings and facilities, and to permit the connection of existing facilities that are not currently on the network. An estimated $224,500 is included for the E-mail and File System Migration project. This project will migrate the city E-mail system from GroupWise to another e-mail system. The project will also implement a new e-mail archive system and will move file and print management. Finally, $185,000 has 118 been included for a Network and Data Security Upgrade project. This project will examine city wide data security standards, policies and procedures and will result in establishing guidelines and business practices that will bring the city more closely in alignment with industry best practices for information security. These latter two projects, as well as $200,000 of the MDT System Replacement budget, will be funded using a portion of the balance of the Radio System Replacement project, which is complete and came in under budget. Finally, funds in the amount of $763,286 will be transferred to the Electric Fund. These funds reflect the balance of the Radio System Replacement project. In addition, as mentioned in the Sidewalks and Trails section of the Streets Capital overview, $227,083 will be transferred to the Streets Capital Improvement Projects Fund for use on the College Main Plaza Improvements project. ADDITIONAL O&M COSTS  The FY12 Approved Budget includes a number of governmental capital projects that have been recently completed and have added operations and maintenance (O&M) expense. In particular, the City’s General Fund has been and will continue to be impacted by capital projects as they come on line. In some situations, the O&M cost of a project is minimal and can be absorbed by the City department that is benefiting the most from the project. In other situations, the O&M cost is more significant and funding for these additional expenses is addressed through the Service Level Adjustment (SLA) process. In these situations, SLAs are submitted for the O&M needs of the capital projects and funding is considered as part of the budget process (i.e. for additional personnel). In some situations the anticipated O&M cost is added to the base budget (i.e. additional budget for utility costs). Departments are expected to consider the impact of current and planned capital improvement projects on operations and maintenance (O&M) budgets. This analysis is a component of the 5-year Strategic Business Plans that are completed by all City departments. Projections as to the impact of capital projects on O&M budgets that are included in the Strategic Business Plans are used by the Finance Office in financial forecasting. The FY12 Approved Budget includes funds that will be used toward the anticipated O&M costs associated with the opening of Fire Station #6. A total of $1,853,555 has been included in the FY12 budget for this purpose. This includes the salary and benefits for the hiring of an ambulance crew (nine personnel) and an engine crew (nine personnel). Nine of these positions were approved as part of the FY11 Approved Budget, but the positions were not filled due to the delay in the construction of the fire station. The remaining nine positions will be added to the FY12 budget as part of the SLA process. Other O&M costs related to Fire Station #6 that are in the budget include budget for various supplies and maintenance, as well as purchased services such as utility costs. The FY12 Approved Budget also includes budget for O&M costs associated with several street projects. Budget for street sweeping, landscaping and irrigation has been included in the Public Works base budget for the Tauber and Stasney Rehabilitation project, the Holleman Extension project, the Victoria Avenue Extension project and the Royder Road project. In addition, budget for the utility costs associated with several new traffic signals, as well as budget for maintenance of several hike and bike trails, is also included in the Public Works base budget. Finally, included in the approved Parks and Recreation base budget are funds for the O&M costs associated with the Skate Park, as well as budget for the maintenance costs associated with the improvements at Emerald Forest Park. A more detailed sheet at the end of this section reflects the estimated O&M costs associated with the governmental capital projects. It is anticipated that the availability of funding for the O&M costs will be limited in upcoming years. Therefore, departments will continue to evaluate current operations before increases in budget will be approved. Recommendations may also be made to delay projects for which O&M funding does not exist. 119 GENERAL GOVERNMENT STREETS, TRAFFIC, SIDEWALKS, AND TRAILS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 PROJECT REVISED APPROVED PROJECT BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS FY 10 - 11 FY 11 - 12 NUMBER AMOUNT THROUGH FY10 APPROPRIATIONS APPROPRIATIONS BEGINNING FUND BALANCE:17,758,173 7,431,751 ADDITIONAL RESOURCES: GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS (03 GOB)440,000 440,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS (08 GOB)2,960,000 4,890,000 CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATIONS - - INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS - 227,083 INTRAGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS - 555,000 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 160,000 25,000 OTHER - - SUBTOTAL ADDITIONAL RESOURCES 3,560,000$ 6,137,083$ TOTAL RESOURCES AVAILABLE 21,318,173$ 13,568,834$ STREET REHABILITATION PROJECTS 1/2 TAUBER AND STASNEY REHAB/NG SIDEWALKS ST0505 2,760,523 2,760,523 - - 3 BIRD POND ROAD REHABILITATION ST1112 1,800,000 1,800,000 - - 1/3 COONER STREET REHAB ST1201 1,203,000 - - 164,000 CLOSED PROJECTS SUBTOTAL 4,560,523$ -$ 164,000$ STREET EXTENSION PROJECTS 2 OVERSIZE PARTICIPATION (OP)ST0519 472,611 - 472,611 - * OP (HOLLEMAN ASSESSMENT)ST1204 500,000 - - 100,000 2 HOLLEMAN EXTENSION ST0913 2,125,000 2,125,000 - - 3 VICTORIA AVENUE EXT ST0903 2,455,000 2,455,000 - - 3 JONES BUTLER (PENBERTHY) EXTENSION ST0905 3,283,500 369,365 2,914,135 - 3 ROYDER ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ST1037 1,000,000 1,000,000 - - 3 HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER PARKWAY ST1205 2,500,000 - - 2,500,000 ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD PROJECTS - 2 ROCK PRAIRIE RD WIDENING - DESIGN & ROW ST0417 2,969,000 2,969,000 - - 3 ROCK PRAIRIE RD WEST ROW ST1025 740,000 115,000 - 250,000 ** ROCK PRAIRIE RD BRIDGE WIDENING DESIGN ST1118 567,000 567,000 - - BARRON ROAD PROJECTS - 3 BARRON ROAD WIDENING PHASE II ST1026 5,363,779 7,801,145 - - 3 BARRON ROAD EAST/LAKEWAY ST1101 15,135,000 190,000 210,000 1,100,000 *** CLOSED PROJECTS - - SUBTOTAL 17,591,510$ 3,596,746$ 3,950,000$ STREET TXDOT PROJECTS WELLBORN WIDENING REIMBURSEMENT ST0510 780,633 780,633 - - NORTHGATE PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS AFA ST1117 274,570 274,570 - - CLOSED TXDOT PROJECTS - - SUBTOTAL 1,055,203$ -$ -$ BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS 120 GENERAL GOVERNMENT STREETS, TRAFFIC, SIDEWALKS, AND TRAILS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 PROJECT EXPENDITURES ACTUAL ESTIMATE PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED THROUGH FY09 FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 13,747,959 21,886,547 7,431,751 2,751,417 1,138,832 537,252 286,252 155,512 1,080,000 - 440,000 - - - - - 11,445,000 700,000 4,890,000 14,355,000 15,800,000 600,000 600,000 - - - - - - - - - 5,500 291,290 227,083 - - - - - - 55,790 555,000 1,020,634 100,000 100,000 44,210 - 21,033 72,000 25,000 25,000 10,000 5,000 4,000 2,000 6,415 - - - - - - - 12,557,948$ 1,119,081$ 6,137,083$ 15,400,634$ 15,910,000$ 705,000$ 648,210$ 2,000$ 26,305,907$ 23,005,628$ 13,568,834$ 18,152,051$ 17,048,832$ 1,242,252$ 934,462$ 157,512$ 477,846 146,103 1,991,190 145,384 - - - - - - - 175,000 1,625,000 - - - - - - - - 154,000 1,049,000 - - - - 118,209 - - - - - - 477,846$ 264,311$ 2,166,190$ 1,924,384$ 1,049,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - - - 472,611 - - - - - - - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 77,364 910,186 1,137,450 - - - - - - 78,105 122,709 1,937,667 316,519 - - - - - 7,769 58,689 214,205 575,692 2,427,145 - - - - - 44,278 955,722 - - - - - - - - - 500,000 2,000,000 - - - - 747,026 4,607 354,000 931,684 931,683 - - - - - 34,721 54,629 266,379 384,271 - - - - - - 500 226,300 226,800 113,400 - - - - 104,350 4,134,000 1,125,429 - - - - - - - 330,000 710,000 4,614,320 9,480,680 - - - 724,975 1,557,749 269,007 77,984 - - - - 1,635,238$ 2,837,289$ 9,387,180$ 5,302,598$ 10,684,219$ 9,694,080$ 100,000$ 100,000$ -$ 453,680 - 235,391 91,562 - - - - - - - 274,570 - - - - - - 978,193 160,858 99,247 3,875 1,431,872$ 160,858$ 609,208$ 95,437$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ PROJECTED EXPENDITURES 121 GENERAL GOVERNMENT STREETS, TRAFFIC, SIDEWALKS, AND TRAILS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 PROJECT REVISED APPROVED PROJECT BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS FY 10 - 11 FY 11 - 12 NUMBER AMOUNT THROUGH FY10 APPROPRIATIONS APPROPRIATIONS BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS TRAFFIC PROJECTS 2 TRAFFIC SYSTEM SAFETY IMPR.ST0511 43,203 43,203 - - 2 SIGNAL @ BARRON/SH40 ST1029 75,000 75,000 - - 2/3 SIGNAL @ TEXAS/KRENEK TAP ST1105 200,000 200,000 - - SIGNAL @ GB DRIVE EAST & DOMINIK ST0205 170,000 170,000 - - 3 NEW TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROJECTS (2008 GOB)ST1027 1,904,198 - 292,698 3 SIGNAL @ WELLBORN/F&B ST1031 250,000 250,000 - - 2/3 SIGNAL @ SH30/COPPERFIELD ST1106 525,000 286,248 238,752 - 2/3 SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY ST1107 42,000 28,450 13,550 - 3 SIGNAL @2818/FM 60 ST1207 380,000 - - - 3 SIGNAL @ UNIVERSITY DR/UNIVERSITY TOWN CTR TBD 100,000 - - - 2 TRAFFIC SIGNAL COMMUNICATIONS ST0411 90,091 90,091 - - CLOSED PROJECTS SUBTOTAL 1,142,992$ 545,000$ -$ SIDEWALKS & TRAILS 2005 BIKE LOOP - BIKE LOOP COMPLETION ST0530 327,202 327,202 - - MISC. BIKE TRAILS - BIKE LOOP COMPLETION ST9803 169,000 169,000 - - 2 HIKE AND BIKE TRAILS - LONGMIRE IMPROVEMENTS ST0521 1,033,624 1,033,624 - - 3 SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS (2008 GOB)ST1028 200,000 - - 200,000 2/3 LINCOLN SIDEWALKS ST0910 249,167 249,167 - - 3 HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL COMPLETION ST0904 749,000 749,000 - - 3 HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL COMPLETION PHASE II ST1103 251,000 251,000 - - 3 LICK CREEK HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL ST1104 4,410,000 - 100,000 563,000 3 UNIVERSITY DR PEDESTRIAN IMP Ph II ST1206 7,055,000 - - 829,500 COLLEGE MAIN PLAZA IMPROVEMENTS ST1113 692,000 692,000 - - CLOSED PROJECTS SUBTOTAL 3,470,993$ 100,000$ 1,592,500$ CAPITAL PROJECTS SUBTOTAL 27,821,221$ 4,241,746$ 5,706,500$ OTHER 779,228 - DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS 12,000 35,000 GENERAL & ADMIN. CHARGES 377,517 368,924 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5,410,491$ 6,110,424$ CAFR Adjustment ENDING FUND BALANCE:15,907,682$ 7,458,410$ * Estimated $500,000 to be received through future assessments related to Holleman Extension project. Funds will not be available for expenditure until they are received. **Project added to FY11 Revised Budget. Budget transferred from Barron Rd Widening Phase II. ***FY12 closed Projects includes balance of ST0804 ($73,984) - Discovery Drive Extension. 1 - Funded through CDBG Funds. 2 - Indicates projects funded through 2003 G.O. Bond Authorization 3 - Indicates projects funded through 2008 G.O. Bond Authorization 122 GENERAL GOVERNMENT STREETS, TRAFFIC, SIDEWALKS, AND TRAILS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 PROJECT EXPENDITURES ACTUAL ESTIMATE PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED THROUGH FY09 FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 PROJECTED EXPENDITURES - - 19,413 23,790 - - - - - 138 40,524 34,338 - - - - - - - - 200,000 - - - - - - 33,373 - 136,627 - - - - - - - - - 11,248 120,000 600,000 600,000 572,950 - - - - 250,000 - - - - - - - 65,000 460,000 - - - - - - - 42,000 - - - - - - - - - 65,000 315,000 - - - - - - - - 100,000 - - - - 27,555 - 30,000 32,536 - - - - - 6,713 304,422 111,832 - - - - - 67,778$ 344,946$ 639,210$ 842,574$ 535,000$ 600,000$ 600,000$ 572,950$ -$ - - 327,202 - - - - - - 59,063 - 109,937 - - - - - - 820,519 39,770 173,335 - - - - - - - - - 200,000 - - - - - 82 254 248,831 - - - - - - 41,392 126,501 581,107 - - - - - - - - 27,000 224,000 - - - - - - - 50,000 508,000 1,151,000 2,701,000 - - - - - - 679,500 3,194,000 3,181,500 - - - - - 55,000 637,000 - - - - - 14,112 230,544 34,932 - - - - - - 935,168$ 397,069$ 1,607,344$ 2,248,500$ 4,345,000$ 5,882,500$ -$ -$ -$ 4,547,903$ 4,004,473$ 14,409,132$ 10,413,493$ 16,613,219$ 16,176,580$ 700,000$ 672,950$ -$ 20,585 779,228 - - - - - - 11,846 8,000 35,000 50,000 60,000 6,000 6,000 - 566,845 377,517 368,924 350,000 275,000 250,000 100,000 100,000 4,603,749$ 15,573,877$ 10,817,417$ 17,013,219$ 16,511,580$ 956,000$ 778,950$ 100,000$ 184,389 21,886,547$ 7,431,751$ 2,751,417$ 1,138,832$ 537,252$ 286,252$ 155,512$ 57,512$ 123 GENERAL GOVERNMENT PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 PROJECT REVISED APPROVED PROJECT BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS FY 10 - 11 FY 11 - 12 NUMBER AMOUNT THROUGH FY10 APPROPRIATIONS APPROPRIATIONS BEGINNING FUND BALANCE:$904,245 $1,448,747 ADDITIONAL RESOURCES: GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS (2003 GOB)- - GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS (2008 GOB)2,180,000 2,715,000 CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATIONS - - INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS - - INTRAGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS 235,910 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 7,000 15,000 OTHER 81,600 81,600 SUBTOTAL ADDITIONAL RESOURCES $2,504,510 $2,811,600 TOTAL RESOURCES AVAILABLE $3,408,755 $4,260,347 PARK PROJECTS FIELD REDEVELOPMENT PK0300 ANNUAL - - 68,384 1 CREEK VIEW NEIGHBORHOOD PARK PK0906 515,000 515,000 - - 1 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK IMP PROJECTS PK0910 10,907 4,868 6,039 - 1 EMERALD FOREST PARK IMPROVEMENTS PK0713 106,000 106,000 - - 1 UNIVERSITY PARK IMPROVEMENTS PK0410 93,000 - 93,000 - 1 SANDSTONE SHADE COVER PK1108 27,750 3,192 24,558 - 1 THOMAS PARK SHADE COVER PK1112 30,000 16,850 13,150 - 1 WOODCREEK PARK SITE IMPROVEMENTS PK1114 72,850 - 72,850 - 1 SKATE PARK PK0911 924,451 924,451 - - 1 NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS REVOLVING FUND PK0912 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 1 BEACHY CENTRAL PARK IMPROVEMENTS PK1001 930,000 150,000 780,000 - 1 LICK CREEK PK IRON BRIDGE TRAIL COMPL PK1201 100,000 - - 100,000 1 LINCOLN CENTER ADDITION TBD 4,285,000 - - - 1 EAST DISTRICT MAINTENANCE SHOP REP PK1101 1,645,000 - 1,645,000 - 1 LICK CREEK NATURE CENTER PK1102 2,495,000 - 100,000 2,395,000 CLOSED PROJECTS 5,227 100,403 CAPITAL PROJECTS SUBTOTAL $2,725,588 $2,835,000 $2,563,384 MISCELLANEOUS - - DEBT ISSUANCE COST 10,000 20,000 GENERAL & ADMIN. CHARGES 52,759 43,029 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $2,897,759 $2,626,413 CAFR Adjustment ENDING FUND BALANCE:$510,996 $1,633,934 1 - Indicates projects funded through 2008 G.O. Bond Authorization BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS 124 GENERAL GOVERNMENT PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 PROJECT EXPENDITURES ACTUAL ESTIMATE PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED THROUGH FY09 FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 $1,335,947 $1,796,539 $1,448,747 $1,926,088 $401,474 $184,953 $137,245 $123,050 - - - - - - - - 870,000 1,260,000 2,715,000 2,175,000 395,000 3,840,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 235,910 - - - - - 3,731 14,000 15,000 15,000 9,000 5,000 2,500 2,500 82,232 80,000 81,600 83,200 84,900 86,600 88,300 90,100 $955,963 $1,589,910 $2,811,600 $2,273,200 $488,900 $3,931,600 $90,800 $92,600 $2,291,910 $3,386,449 $4,260,347 $4,199,288 $890,374 $4,116,553 $228,045 $215,650 344,108 10,315 83,115 68,384 86,772 265,421 64,308 84,995 126,322 3,289 15,669 8,000 - 488,042 - - - - - - 10,907 - - - - - - - 4,539 101,461 - - - - - - - 2,304 9,000 81,696 - - 27,750 - - - - - - - - 30,000 - - - - - - - - 72,850 - - - - - - 28,709 112,725 783,017 - - - - - - 417,400 12,534 276,223 293,843 - - - - - - 70,193 67,500 792,307 - - - - - - - - 100,000 - - - - - - - - - 50,000 395,000 3,840,000 - - - - 2,000 198,000 1,445,000 - - - - - - 100,000 737,000 1,658,000 - - - - 202,241 298,120 - - - - - - $793,506 $430,520 $1,869,943 $2,271,230 $3,727,814 $660,421 $3,904,308 $84,995 $126,322 - - - - - - - - 787 15,000 20,000 20,000 5,000 35,000 - - 93,578 52,759 43,029 50,000 40,000 40,000 20,000 10,000 $524,885 $1,937,702 $2,334,259 $3,797,814 $705,421 $3,979,308 $104,995 $136,322 29,514 $1,796,539 $1,448,747 $1,926,088 $401,474 $184,953 $137,245 $123,050 $79,328 PROJECTED EXPENDITURES 125 GENERAL GOVERNMENT FACILITIES AND TECHNOLOGY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 PROJECT REVISED APPROVED BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS FY10-11 FY11-12 AMOUNT THROUGH FY10 APPROPRIATIONS APPROPRIATIONS BEGINNING FUND BALANCE:11,507,268$ 9,781,490$ ADDITIONAL RESOURCES: GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS (03 GOB)500,000$ -$ GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS (08 GOB)- - CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATIONS 380,000 100,000 INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS - - INTRAGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS 231,040 - INVESTMENT EARNINGS 133,000 25,000 OTHER - - SUBTOTAL ADDITIONAL RESOURCES 1,244,040$ 125,000$ TOTAL RESOURCES AVAILABLE 12,751,308$ 9,906,490$ PUBLIC FACILITIES LIBRARY BOOK DONATIONS GG9901 291,348 291,348 - - NORTHGATE IMPROVEMENTS GG0803 180,495 180,495 - - 2 FIRE STATION #6 GG0903 6,990,000 6,990,000 - - FIRE EMERGENCY RESPONSE ALERTING GG1201 599,000 - - 599,000 2 LIBRARY EXPANSION GG1010 8,385,000 932,000 - - * CLOSED PROJECTS - - FACILITY PROJECTS SUBTOTAL -$ -$ 599,000$ TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS 0 MDT SYSTEM REPLACEMENT CO0701 300,000 300,000 - - WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE CO0704 200,000 200,000 - - FIBER OPTIC INFRASTRUCTURE CO0902 1,000,000 375,390 25,534 36,390 E-MAIL AND FILE SYSTEM MIGRATION CO1201 224,500 - - 224,500 NETWORK & DATA SECURITY UPGRADE CO1202 185,000 - - 185,000 * CLOSED PROJECTS 431,040 IT PROJECTS SUBTOTAL 875,390$ 456,574$ 445,890$ CAPITAL PROJECTS SUBTOTAL 875,390$ 456,574$ 1,044,890$ DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS 5,000$ 1,000$ TRANSFERS 1,331,832 990,369 OTHER - - GENERAL & ADMIN. CHARGES 92,942 89,118 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,886,348$ 2,125,377$ CAFR Adjustment ENDING FUND BALANCE:10,864,960$ 7,781,113$ 1 - Indicates projects funded through 2003 G.O. Bond Authorization 2 - Indicates projects funded through 2008 G.O. Bond Authorization BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS 126 GENERAL GOVERNMENT FACILITIES AND TECHNOLOGY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 PROJECT EXPENDITURES ACTUAL ESTIMATE PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED THROUGH FY09 FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY16-17 9,118,722$ 13,351,649$ 9,781,490$ 594,972$ 571,823$ 592,767$ 344,031$ 209,031$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6,240,000 - - 400,000 4,000,000 3,985,000 - - 1,050,000 - 100,000 100,000 100,000 225,000 - - - - - - - - - - 7,111 108,500 - - - - - - 14,704 58,000 25,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 2,500 2,500 82,512 - - - - - - - 7,394,327$ 166,500$ 125,000$ 505,000$ 4,105,000$ 4,215,000$ 2,500$ 2,500$ 16,513,049$ 13,518,149$ 9,906,490$ 1,099,972$ 4,676,823$ 4,807,767$ 346,531$ 211,531$ 178,722 18,766 40,000 20,000 20,000 13,860 - - - 79,497 9,301 91,697 - - - - - - 9,715 226,020 405,000 6,349,265 - - - - - - - - 599,000 - - - - - - 6,919 - - 315,149 3,819,696 4,243,236 - - 788,496 567,525 430,766 - - - - - 267,934$ 1,049,502$ 1,104,222$ 7,399,031$ 335,149$ 3,833,556$ 4,243,236$ -$ -$ - - - 300,000 - - - - - 76,114 4,866 99,020 - - - - - - 33,093 58,986 186,345 122,500 113,000 134,500 103,500 135,000 113,076 - - - 224,500 - - - - - - - - 185,000 - - - - - 1,859,760 917,298 - - - - - - 109,207$ 1,923,612$ 1,202,663$ 832,000$ 113,000$ 134,500$ 103,500$ 135,000$ 113,076$ 2,973,114$ 2,306,885$ 8,231,031$ 448,149$ 3,968,056$ 4,346,736$ 135,000$ 113,076$ 109,565$ 5,000$ 1,000$ 5,000$ 41,000$ 42,000$ -$ -$ - 1,331,832 990,369 - - - - 2,857 - - - - - - - 113,708 92,942 89,118 75,000 75,000 75,000 2,500 2,500 3,199,244$ 3,736,659$ 9,311,518$ 528,149$ 4,084,056$ 4,463,736$ 137,500$ 115,576$ 37,844$ 13,351,649$ 9,781,490$ 594,972$ 571,823$ 592,767$ 344,031$ 209,031$ 95,955$ PROJECTED EXPENDITURES 127 GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUSINESS PARK CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 PROJECT REVISED APPROVED PROJECT BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS FY 10-11 FY 11-12 NUMBER AMOUNT THROUGH FY10 APPROPRIATIONS APPROPRIATIONS BEGINNING FUND BALANCE:366,613$ 111,150$ ADDITIONAL RESOURCES: CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATIONS -$ -$ INTRAGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS - - INVESTMENT EARNINGS 5,000 1,000 OTHER - - SUBTOTAL ADDITIONAL RESOURCES 5,000$ 1,000$ TOTAL RESOURCES AVAILABLE 371,613$ 112,150$ BUSINESS PARK FUND CLOSED PROJECTS - - CAPITAL PROJECTS SUBTOTAL -$ -$ OTHER - - DEBT ISSUANCE COST - - TRANSFER OUT 250,000 112,150 GENERAL & ADMIN CHARGES - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES 250,000$ 112,150$ ENDING FUND BALANCE:121,613$ -$ BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS 128 GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUSINESS PARK CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 PROJECT EXPENDITURES ACTUAL PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED THROUGH FY09 FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 609,113$ 359,650$ 111,150$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - - - - - - - - 2,587 1,500 1,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2,587$ 1,500$ 1,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 611,700$ 361,150$ 112,150$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - 1,884 - - - - - - - -$ 1,884$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 166 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 250,000 250,000 112,150 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 252,050$ 250,000$ 112,150$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 359,650$ 111,150$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ PROJECTED EXPENDITURES 129 GENERAL GOVERNMENT CHIMNEY HILL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 PROJECT REVISED APPROVED PROJECT BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS FY10-11 FY11-12 NUMBER AMOUNT THROUGH FY10 APPROPRIATIONS APPROPRIATIONS BEGINNING FUND BALANCE:1,502,929$ 1,858,164$ ADDITIONAL RESOURCES: CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION -$ -$ INTERGOVERNMENTAL - - INTRAGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS - - INVESTMENT EARNINGS 24,600 9,000 OTHER 400,000 423,890 SUBTOTAL ADDITIONAL RESOURCES 424,600$ 432,890$ TOTAL RESOURCES AVAILABLE 1,927,529$ 2,291,054$ PUBLIC FACILITIES CONVENTION CNTR GG0907 TBD 9,600,000$ -$ -$ CLOSED PROJECTS CAPITAL PROJECTS SUBTOTAL -$ -$ OTHER 138,179 125,000 TRANSFER OUT - - DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS - - GENERAL & ADMIN CHARGES - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES 138,179$ 125,000$ ENDING FUND BALANCE:1,789,350$ 2,166,054$ BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS 130 GENERAL GOVERNMENT CHIMNEY HILL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 PROJECT EXPENDITURES ACTUAL PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED THROUGH FY09 FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 1,286,665$ 1,563,332$ 1,858,164$ 2,166,054$ 2,456,054$ 2,751,054$ 3,046,054$ 3,346,054$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6,152 8,000 9,000 15,000 20,000 20,000 25,000 25,000 437,161 436,832 423,890 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 443,313$ 444,832$ 432,890$ 415,000$ 420,000$ 420,000$ 425,000$ 425,000$ 1,729,978$ 2,008,164$ 2,291,054$ 2,581,054$ 2,876,054$ 3,171,054$ 3,471,054$ 3,771,054$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 166,646 150,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 166,646$ 150,000$ 125,000$ 125,000$ 125,000$ 125,000$ 125,000$ 125,000$ 1,563,332$ 1,858,164$ 2,166,054$ 2,456,054$ 2,751,054$ 3,046,054$ 3,346,054$ 3,646,054$ PROJECTED EXPENDITURES 131 Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 Comments Street/Traffic Projects Tauber and Stasney Rehab 8,112 8,355 8,606 8,864 9,130 9,404 Sweeping, landscaping, irrigation Bird Pond Rehab - 5,000 5,150 5,305 5,464 5,628 Sweeping, landscaping, irrigation Cooner Street Rehab - - 1,800 1,854 1,910 1,967 Sweeping, landscaping, irrigation Holleman Extension 4,810 4,954 5,103 5,256 5,414 5,576 Sweeping, landscaping, irrigation Victoria Avenue Extension 4,425 4,558 4,694 4,835 4,980 5,130 Sweeping, landscaping, irrigation Jones Butler Extension - - 4,233 4,360 4,491 4,626 Sweeping, landscaping, irrigation Royder Road 2,886 2,973 3,062 3,154 3,248 3,346 Sweeping, landscaping, irrigation Health Science Center Parkway - - TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Barron Road Widening Phase II - 20,054 20,656 21,275 21,914 22,571 Sweeping, landscaping, irrigation Barron Road East/Lakeway Drive - - - 11,543 11,889 12,246 Sweeping, landscaping, irrigation Signal at SH40/Barron 2,045 2,106 2,170 2,235 2,302 2,371 Supply, maintenance and utility costs Signal at Barron/Victoria 2,045 2,106 2,170 2,235 2,302 2,371 Utility costs Traffic Signal at George Bush/Dominik 2,045 2,106 2,170 2,235 2,302 2,371 Utility costs New Traffic Signals (2008 GOB)- 2,045 8,548 14,744 20,937 21,565 Utility costs Signal at Wellborn/F&B - 2,045 2,106 2,170 2,235 2,302 Utility costs Signal at Texas/Krenek Tap 2,045 2,106 2,170 2,235 2,302 2,371 Utility costs Signal at SH30/Copperfield - 2,045 2,106 2,170 2,235 2,302 Utility costs Signal at 2818/FM 60 - - 2,045 2,106 2,170 2,235 Utility costs Signal at University Dr/University Town Center - - 2,045 2,106 2,170 2,235 Utility costs Bike Loop - 2005 1,450 1,494 1,538 1,584 1,632 1,681 Maintenance costs Hike and Bike Trails - Longmire Improvements 200 206 212 219 225 232 Maintenance costs Hike and Bike Trail Completion 1,000 1,030 1,061 1,093 1,126 1,159 Trail Maintenance costs Hike and Bike Trail Completion - Phase 2 2,000 2,060 2,122 2,185 2,251 2,319 Trail Maintenance costs Lick Creek Hike and Bike Trail - - - 8,000 8,240 8,487 Trail Maintenance costs University Drive Pedestrian Improvements Ph II - - - - - - TBD - O&M estimated to begin FY15 Street/Traffic Project Totals 33,063$ 65,244$ 83,766$ 111,762$ 120,865$ 124,491$ Parks Projects Creek View Neighborhood Park - - 23,140 23,834 24,549 25,286 Personnel, supplies, maintenance, landscaping and utility costs Emerald Forest Park 775 798 822 847 872 898 Mainteinance costs University Park - 200 206 212 219 225 Mainteinance costs Skate Park 7,400 7,622 7,851 8,086 8,329 8,579 Maintenance and utility costs Lick Creek Park Iron Bridge Trail Completion - 2,700 2,781 2,864 2,950 3,039 Trail Maintenance costs Lincoln Center Addition - - - - 98,050 100,992 Personnel, supplies, utility costs and facilities maintenance Lick Creek Nature Center - - 247,650 255,080 262,732 270,614 Personnel (2 FT + temp/seasonal); supplies; utility costs; facilities maintenance; and other services Parks Project Totals 8,175$ 11,320$ 282,450$ 290,923$ 397,701$ 409,632$ Facility and Technology Projects Fire Station #6 1,853,555 1,348,130 1,382,470 1,417,837 1,454,265 1,491,783 Personnel: ambulance company (9 FTE), engine company (9 FTE); vehicle maintenance and replacement; utility and landscaping service costs; and supplies. Library Expansion - - - - 206,000 212,180 Personnel (3 positions), supplies, utility costs, book replacement and facilities maintenance MDT System Replacement - 11,000 11,330 11,670 12,020 12,381 Maintenance Agreement E-mail and File System Migration - 61,391 57,233 58,950 60,718 62,540 Licensing Agreement and server cost Network and Data Security Upgrade - 10,000 10,300 10,609 10,927 11,255 Network and Application Security Testing Facilities and Technology Project Totals $ 1,853,555 $ 1,430,521 $ 1,461,333 $ 1,499,066 $ 1,743,930 $ 1,790,138 Total Estimated O&M Costs 1,894,793$ 1,507,085$ 1,827,549$ 1,901,751$ 2,262,497$ 2,324,262$ Governmental Funds Capital Improvement Projects Estimated Operations and Maintenance Costs* *The Operations and Maintenance costs reflected above are estimates based on anticipated costs associated with each project. In some situations, the O&M cost of a project is minimal and can be absorbed by the City department that is benefiting the most from the project. In other situations, the O&M cost is more significant and funding for these additional expenses is addressed through the Service Level Adjustment (SLA) process. As the projects become better defined, the O&M estimates may be revised. 132 Utility Funds The utility funds account for revenues and expenditures in the Electric, Water and Wastewater funds. The Electric, Water and Wastewater Funds’ budgets are prepared using the modified accrual basis of accounting and the current financial resources measurement focus. The budget measures the net change in working capital. The measurement focus adjustment to arrive at Actual 2010 Working Capital is necessary because the proprietary funds’ financial statements are prepared using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. The Electric Fund, the Water Fund and the Wastewater Fund account for the operation and maintenance of these Utility services that are self-supported by user fees. Electric Fund The FY12 Electric Fund revenue is estimated to be $100,623,786. This is a 1.1% increase from the FY11 year end estimate of $99,535,667. The FY11 year end estimate reflects the unusually hot temperatures that occurred in the spring and summer. The FY12 revenue estimate reflects more typical weather patterns. Included as part of the other nonoperating revenue is a transfer in the amount of $763,286 to the Electric Fund from the General Government Capital Improvement Projects Fund. This reflects the balance of the Radio System Replacement project. Also included is a transfer in the amount of $250,000 to the Electric Fund from the Economic Development Fund. No rate increase is included in the Electric Fund in FY12. FY12 operating expenditures in the Electric Fund are projected to be $86,529,268. This reflects a 1.37% decrease from the FY11 revised budget. Two Service Level Adjustments (SLA’s) were included in the FY12 Approved Budget that will reduce expenditures. The first reduction SLA, in the amount of $50,500, results in the elimination of the Goodwill Tree Program that has been included in the electric budget since FY08. Projects funded in the past by this program include trees planted following phase I of the W.D. Fitch Parkway Widening and partial funding of the trees planted at the University Drive/SH 6 interchange. The budget includes shifting these funds from the tree program to a padmount transformer and equipment maintenance program, which is described in more detail below. A second reduction SLA is for the reduction in the Sun Source Solar Photovoltaic Rebate Program. The previous budget for this program was $75,000. The FY12 SLA reduces the budget for this program to $37,500. The program previously paid on a per AC watt installation of $3.00 per watt up to a maximum rebate of $12,000 per customer. In FY12, the per AC watt payment be reduced by one half, or to $1.50 per AC watt, with a maximum rebate of $6,000 per customer. Six SLA’s are included in the Electric Fund’s approved budget that will result in budget increases. The first SLA, in the amount of $102,000, is for the transmission tree-trimming program. The North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) regulations require the Electric Utility to have an ongoing vegetation management program in order to maintain access to the transmission system for system reliability. This program is on a three-year maintenance cycle and this is the second iteration of an ongoing maintenance plan to achieve the requirements. A second SLA is for the addition of training funds to the dispatch division in the amount of $10,000. These funds are needed in order to comply with NERC regulations that require all Transmission Operators to have NERC-certified operating personnel on shift in required positions at all times. The third SLA, in the amount of $50,500, is for the implementation of a padmount transformer and equipment maintenance program. This pilot program will restore the exterior cabinets of padmount transformers and equipment that have been damaged by corrosion from exposure to weather, sprinkler systems and fertilizer. As mentioned above, the budget from the Goodwill Tree Program will be reallocated to fund this program. A fourth SLA is to provide funds for the contracting of services in order to meet Federal guidelines for regular and systematic testing of components comprising our electric system. The Electric Utility must demonstrate how and when the testing was performed and must keep records of such testing as prescribed by mandated protocols. This SLA will provide a budget of $60,000 for the outsourcing of these services. The fifth SLA, in the amount of $65,000, is for the outsourcing of a commercial meter testing program. The program will allow for the testing of 300 commercial meter installations per year. A final SLA will provide the budget needed for the operating costs associated with the new dispatch facility. Construction on the new dispatch facility should be complete in late 2011. This SLA will allocate $14,500 for these costs. In addition to the SLA’s, reductions were made to the base budget as a result of restructuring how certain processes will be handled by the department. Funds for two temporary/seasonal positions were removed from the budget. One of these positions, within the Administration Division, has not been filled in several years. The second position, in the Warehouse Division, was a filled position. The FY12 non-operating expenditures are $11,707,104 or 12.9% below the FY11 revised non-operating budget. This is primarily due to a decrease in the Return-on-Investment (ROI) transfer that is made from the Electric Fund to the General Fund. For FY12, the ROI has been reduced by $2,000,000. It is anticipated that the ROI will be reduced a further $1,000,000 in FY13, for a total reduction of $3,000,000. The FY12 estimated ending working capital is anticipated to increase 65% when 133 compared to the FY11 estimated ending working capital. This is due, in part, to the reduction of the ROI. In addition, the working capital is projected to increase over the next several years in order to meet the 15% reserve policy. Water Fund Water Fund revenue for FY12 is estimated to be $13,780,000. This is an 8.98% decrease from the FY11 year end estimate of $15,140,260. The FY11 year end estimate reflects extreme drought conditions and resultant record high water usage. The FY12 revenue estimate reflects more typical water usage patterns. Revenue received in FY11 above what was originally forecasted will be used to fund capital projects and will mitigate future rate increases. Customer growth in FY12 is projected to be 3% based on historical trends, overall economic indicators and population projections; however, as mentioned above, weather conditions impact water consumption. No rate increase is included for residential and commercial users the Water Fund in FY12. FY12 operating expenditures in the Water Fund are projected to be $6,345,907 or 2.53% above the FY11 revised budget. A component of this is due to an increase in the General and Administrative (G&A) transfer. A portion of the increase is attributable to an increase in the transfer to the Electric Fund. The facility operating costs of the buildings occupied by the Water, Wastewater and Electric utilities are budgeted in the Electric budget. In addition, costs for support staff and warehouse staff that are shared by the three utilities is also budgeted in the Electric budget. A transfer is made from the Water Fund to cover the Water Department’s cost of these services. An increase in costs occurred in FY12, which resulted in an increase in this transfer. The G&A also includes a transfer to the General Fund to cover administrative costs that are centralized in the General Fund, i.e. HR, finance, legal, etc. This portion of the transfer also increased in FY12. Two SLA’s were included that reduced the FY12 Water Fund approved budget by $45,480. The first SLA, which reduced the budget by $41,480, is for the discontinuation of the addition of fluoride to the drinking water. The addition of fluoride to the drinking water is not legally required and discontinuing the program will result in O&M and capital savings and will improve employee safety by removing this hazardous chemical from the work place. The water supply naturally contains approximately one-half of the recommended level. In addition, a reduction SLA of $4,000 is included to reduce the budget allocated for the conservation rebate program. The current budget for rebates is $8,000. The remaining $4,000 is consistent with rebate payments made in the past two fiscal years, but may limit the program in future years if popularity increases. In addition to the SLA’s, several reductions were made to the base budget as a result of restructuring how certain processes will be handled by the department. A net total of $31,008 was reduced from the budget due to the elimination of the Water Auditor position. When this position became vacant in FY11, it was not filled and the water audit services were contracted out. It has been determined that this is a less costly way to handle the water audits and the results of the audits are comparable. Therefore, the position has been eliminated in FY12. $15,000, however, has been included to offset the cost of contracting out the service. The FY11 budget included the addition of a 0.5 FTE Regulatory Compliance Assistant. This position was responsible for assisting Water Services with evaluating and meeting EPA/TCEQ requirement s. The position was shared with the Public Works Department. In FY12, the 0.5 FTE position will be removed from the Water Fund and return at 1.0 FTE to the Public Works Department. A third reduction to the base budget will result in savings of $658. This i s for the formal discontinuation of the backflow program. The backflow program was one in which residential lawn irrigation systems were tested on a five year schedule to address potential backflow issues. This testing has not been done in several years. This reduction will result in the formal discontinuation of the program and will reduce the budget for the remaining costs associated with mailings that would need to be done if the program was still in place. Base budget changes included three additions, two of which reflect mandated increases in costs. The first is the addition of $55,000 for an increase in fees assessed by TCEQ that must be paid in order to maintain regulatory compliance. The second is for the addition of $21,622 for an increase in fees assessed by the Brazos Valley Conservation District. These fees are assessed based on the amount of water used by the City. Finally, the base budget was increased by $8,500 to cover the cost of charge-backs that are being proposed by the Public Works Department. Currently, when utility line repairs that are made as part of a streets maintenance O&M project, the cost is covered by the Public Works Department. This base budget was increased in the Water Fund so that the cost can be charged back. Finally, a Council directed change was made to the FY12 Approved Budget that eliminated a transfer in the amount of $12,500 from the Wastewater Fund to the Economic Development Fund. The FY12 non-operating expenditures are $8,130,495 or 30% below the FY11 revised non-operating budget. This is primarily due to a decrease from $5,250,000 to $1,950,000 in the amount budgeted to be transferred in FY12 to the capital budget for capital projects. These funds are transferred in lieu of additional debt issuance. The reduction also reflects a decrease in the debt service costs which is a result of the refunding done in FY11. The FY12 estimated ending working capital is anticipated to decrease 26.4% when compared to the FY11 estimated ending working capital. This is due primarily to the anticipated $1,950,000 transfer to the Water capital projects fund. Fund balance above the required 15% reserve is transferred to the capital fund to be used in lieu of the issuance of additional debt for Water capital projects. 134 Wastewater Fund The total Wastewater Fund revenue for FY12 is estimated to be $12,774,851. This is a 2.79% increase over the FY11 year end estimate of $12,428,380. A rate increase of 5% is included for the Wastewater Fund in the FY12 Approved Budget to meet the operating, non-operating, capital and debt service coverage requirements in the Fund. This rate increase will be effective January 1, 2012. Wastewater Fund operating expenditures in FY12 are $6,536,932 or 3.96% greater than the FY11 revised budget of $6,287,843. A portion of this is due to an increase in the General and Administrative (G&A) transfer. A portion of this is attributable to an increase in the transfer to the Electric Fund. The facility operating costs of the buildings occupied by the Water, Wastewater and Electric utilities are budgeted in the Electric budget. In addition, costs for support staff and warehouse staff that are shared by the three utilities is also budgeted in the Electric budget. A transfer is made from the Wastewater Fund to cover the Wastewater Department’s cost of these services. An increase in costs occurred in FY12, which resulted in an increase in this transfer. The G&A also includes a transfer to the General Fund to cover administrative costs that are centralized in the General Fund, i.e. HR, finance, legal, etc. This portion of the transfer also increased in FY12. One SLA is included in the Wastewater Fund that results in an increase of $132,000 to the approved budget. This SLA is for the implementation of a wastewater interceptor cleaning/evaluation program. There are six major wastewater interceptors that collect all of the City's wastewater and transport it to the treatment plants. Currently the City does not own the equipment and technology to perform analysis on pipe of this diameter. By outsourcing the cleaning, capacity analysis and visual construction evaluation of the interceptors, the City can better plan, design and construct infrastructure to meet the increasing development driven demand. The program will allow for this analysis to be performed on one interceptor per year. In addition to the SLA, a reduction was made to the base budget as a result of restructuring how certain processes will be handled by the department. $68,199 was reduced from the budget due to the elimination of the Utilities Analyst position. When this position became vacant in FY11, it was not filled. It has been determined that the functions performed by this position can been allocated to Budget staff in the Finance Department as well as to staff within the Water and Wastewater Departments. Therefore, the position has been eliminated in FY12. Base budget changes included an increase of $8,500 to cover the cost of charge-backs that are being proposed by the Public Works Department. Currently, when utility line repairs that are made as part of a streets maintenance O&M project, the cost is covered by the Public Works Department. This base budget was increased in the Wastewater Fund so that the cost can be charged back. Finally, a Council directed change was made to the FY12 Approved Budget that eliminated a transfer in the amount of $12,500 from the Wastewater Fund to the Economic Development Fund. FY12 Approved Wastewater Fund non-operating expenditures are budgeted at $6,491,009 or 4.36% above the FY11 revised non-operating budget. This is primarily due to an increase from $825,000 to $1,120,000 in the amount budgeted to be transferred in FY12 to the capital budget for capital projects. These funds are transferred in lieu of additional debt issuance. The FY12 estimated ending working capital is anticipated to decrease 12.84% when compared to the FY11 estimated ending working capital. This is due primarily to the anticipated $1,120,000 transfer to the Wastewater capital projects fund. Fund balance above the required 15% reserve is transferred to the capital fund to be used in lieu of the issuance of additional debt for Water capital projects. Utility Revenue Bonds are traditionally issued to provide for capital expansion and replacements for the various utility services. In FY11, Certificates of Obligation are projected to be issued in lieu of utility revenue bonds. In FY12, either Utility Revenue Bonds or Certificates of Obligation will be issued for Utility capital projects. Funds in the amount of $8,825,000 are projected to be issued for Electric capital projects, $6,100,000 is projected for Water capital projects and $7,580,000 is projected for Wastewater capital projects. 135 ELECTRIC UTILITY CITY OF COLLEGE STATION City Manager Deputy City Manager Electric Utility Director Utility Dispatch Operations Superintendent UDO Supervisors Dispatchers Substation Metering Superintendent SCADA System Analyst SCADA Technician Substation Supervisor Substation Technicians Metering Supervisor Metering Technicians Energy Coordinator Key Accounts Representative Energy Auditor Utility Administration Manager Electric Compliance/Records Coordinator Administrative Support Staff Warehouse Supervisor Warehouse Assistants Electric Transmission & Distribution Superintendent ET&D Supervisors ET&D Foremen ET&D Line Techs Assistant Director Electrical MappingWorkorder / Purchase RequisitionsElectric Planning 136 City of College Station Electric Fund Fund Summary FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 % Change in FY10 Revised Year-End Approved Approved Budget from Actual Budget Estimate Base Budget Budget FY11-FY12 REVENUES Residential 49,807,196$ 53,484,840 52,993,967$ 53,410,000$ 53,410,000$ -0.14% Commerical/Industrial 35,080,749 38,308,860 37,885,888 38,527,000 38,527,000 0.57% TDA 3,883,994 3,999,235 5,216,694 5,156,000 5,156,000 28.92% Other Sales 126,791 142,000 118,165 126,000 126,000 -11.27% Other Operating 2,036,612 2,110,000 2,230,000 2,190,000 2,190,000 3.79% Investment Earnings 90,254 120,000 90,000 90,500 90,500 -24.58% Other Nonoperating 219,248 241,686 1,000,953 1,124,286 1,124,286 365.18% Total Revenues 91,244,844$ 98,406,621$ 99,535,667$ 100,623,786$ 100,623,786$ 2.25% EXPENDITURES AND TRANSFERS Administration 1,812,058$ 1,816,021$ 1,740,759$ 1,822,794$ 1,837,294$ 1.17% Transmission/Distribution 5,343,752 5,835,797 5,633,707 6,026,883 6,226,383 6.69% Purchased Power 73,695,320 78,100,945 78,100,945 76,451,493 76,451,493 -2.11% Pay Plan Contingency - 3,541 - - - -100.00% Direct Capital 300,516 413,595 590,832 422,000 422,000 2.03% Net Gen/Admin Transfers 1,505,862 1,481,899 1,481,899 1,592,098 1,592,098 7.44% Other (34,693) 77,386 - - - -100.00% Total Operating, Expenditures and Transfers 82,622,815$ 87,729,184$ 87,548,142$ 86,315,268$ 86,529,268$ -1.37% NONOPERATING EXPENDITURES Debt Service - URB 2,517,198$ 2,395,456$ 2,379,631$ 2,348,097$ 2,348,097$ -1.98% Debt Service - CO's 1,714,933 1,960,116 1,923,726 2,304,241 2,304,241 17.56% Debt Service - Refunded GO's - 126,013 126,013 194,875 194,875 54.65% Contingency - 150,000 - 50,000 50,000 -66.67% Return on Investment 8,909,890 8,809,891 7,309,891 6,809,891 6,809,891 -22.70% Other - - - - - N/A Capital Projects Funding - - 886,953 - - Total Non Operating Expenditures 13,142,022$ 13,441,476$ 12,626,214$ 11,707,104$ 11,707,104$ -12.90% TtlE dit dT f 95 764 837$101 170 660$100 174 356$98 022 372$98 236 372$2 90%Total Expenditures and Transfers 95,764,837$ 101,170,660$ 100,174,356$ 98,022,372$ 98,236,372$ -2.90% Increase/Decrease in Working Capital, modified accrual budgetary basis (4,519,993)$ (2,764,039)$ (638,689)$ 2,601,414$ 2,387,414$ Measurement Focus Adjustment (718,132)$ Beginning Working Capital, accrual basis of accounting 9,522,549$ 4,284,424$ 4,284,424$ 3,645,735$ 3,645,735$ Ending Working Capital, accrual basis of accounting 4,284,424$ 1,520,385$ 3,645,735$ 6,247,149$ 6,033,149$ Residential 53.08%Commerical/ Industrial 38.78% TDA 5.12% Other Sales 0.13% Other  Operating 2.18% Investment  Earnings 0.09% Other  Nonoperating 1.12% Electric Fund ‐Sources Administration 1.87% Transmission/D istribution 6.34% Purchased  Power 77.82% Direct Capital 0.43% Net  Gen/Admin  Xfers 1.62% Debt Service 4.93% Contingency 0.05% Return on  Investment 6.93% Electric Fund ‐Uses 137 City of College Station Electric Fund Operations & Maintenance Summary EXPENDITURE BY DIVISION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Warehouse 239,064$ 245,343$ 247,972$ 251,759$ 251,759$ 2.62% Operations Administration 1,572,993 1,570,678 1,492,787 1,571,035 1,585,535 0.95% Substations 78,075 106,374 85,266 206,072 331,072 211.23% Utility Dispatch 13,067 23,273 18,727 23,273 33,273 42.97% Engineering & Design 50,856 208,591 166,919 208,591 208,591 0.00% Energy Conservation 253,171 369,871 305,586 369,871 332,371 -10.14% Tranmission / Distribution 4,948,583 5,127,688 5,057,209 5,219,076 5,321,076 3.77% Purchased Power 73,695,321 75,383,872 77,600,000 76,451,493 76,451,493 1.42% Direct Capital 300,516 413,595 590,832 422,000 422,000 2.03% TOTAL 81,151,646$ 83,449,285$ 85,565,298$ 84,723,170$ 84,937,170$ 1.78% EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Salaries & Benefits 4,863,680$ 4,942,408$ 4,949,634$ 5,143,129$ 5,143,129$ 4.06% Supplies 462,054 529,424 461,933 541,561 541,561 2.29% Maintenance 184,652 218,007 181,809 185,038 185,038 -15.12% Purchased Services 1,413,609 1,636,391 1,506,090 1,654,361 1,905,861 16.47% Direct Capital 300,516 413,595 590,832 422,000 422,000 0.00% Purchased Power 73,695,321 75,383,872 77,600,000 76,451,493 76,451,493 1.42% Other Purchased Services 231,814 325,588 275,000 325,588 288,088 -11.52% TOTAL 81,151,646$ 83,449,285$ 85,565,298$ 84,723,170$ 84,937,170$ 1.78% PERSONNEL Revised Approved Approved % Change in Actual Actual Budget Base Budget Budget Budget from FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Warehouse / Operations Administration 11.50 10.50 10.50 9.50 9.50 -9.52% Transmission / Distribution Administration 57.00 58.00 58.00 58.00 58.00 0.00% TOTAL 68.50 68.50 68.50 67.50 67.50 -1.46% Service Level Adjustments One- Time Recurring Total Tree Trimming - Transmission 102,000$ -$ 102,000$ NERC Certification Pay - 10,000 10,000 Goodwill Tree Program - (50,500) (50,500) Transformer Maintenance - 50,500 50,500 Sun Source Solar Program - (37,500) (37,500) Electric Substations General Labor Program - 60,000 60,000 Meter Testing - 65,000 65,000 Dispatch Center Operating Costs - 14,500 14,500 Electric Total 102,000$ 112,000$ 214,000$ 138 ELECTRIC FUND OPERATIONS Description & Budget Explanation: The Operations Division is responsible for the warehousing of supplies used in City operations, and the purchase and distribution of electric power to the customers of the electric utility. Program Name: Electrical Division Service Level: Provide reliable electric service to the citizens of College Station. Performance Measures FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Total % of time customer will be with power for the previous 12 months 99.99% 99.99% 99.99% 99.99% - Avg. outage time in min. experienced per interruption (CAIDI -Customer Average 44 30 50 30 Interruption Duration Index) - Avg. number of outages experienced per customer (SAIFI - System Average 0.04 0.48 0.12 0.48 Interruption Frequency Index) Output - Number of residential job orders consisting of temporary services installed and removed, conduit installation and service conductor 1,627 1,500 1,100 1,300 - Number of primary conductor in ft. installed 118,665 90,000 70,000 90,000 - Number of customer service job orders consisting of trouble calls, street and security light repairs, and customer concerns 1,428 2,000 1,100 1,200 - Number of commercial electric revenue meters tested 585 1,650 900 1,650 - Number of residential electric revenue meters tested 957 1,000 898 1,000 - Estimated average revenue savings $18,504 $20,000 $24,630 $25,000 Service Level:Provide education and incentives to increase existing and new home efficiencies in College Station Performance Measures FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness -Number of certified Good Cents homes and high efficiency air conditioner replacements for fiscal year 342 204 428 176 -Annual kW. Avoided/reduced 887 510 1,070 380 - Cumulative avoided/reduced kW based on 10 yr. equipment lifespan 58,051 48,149 64,803 67,463 - Number of on-site energy audits performed on commercial and residential 257 213 226 150 - Annual estimated savings to customer $285.29 $286.41 $359.94 $236.67 139  Debt Service Requirements Electric Fund ALL URB SERIES FISCAL YEAR PRINCIPAL INTEREST FISCAL YEAR PAYMENT PRINCIPAL OUTSTANDING OCT. 1 FY12 1,547,368 800,729 2,348,097 18,779,542 FY13 1,540,546 726,652 2,267,198 17,232,174 FY14 1,503,817 656,869 2,160,686 15,691,628 FY15 1,296,972 593,975 1,890,947 14,187,811 FY16 1,358,550 535,278 1,893,828 12,890,840 FY17 1,352,552 476,527 1,829,079 11,532,289 FY18 1,215,141 422,139 1,637,280 10,179,737 FY19 1,059,069 374,666 1,433,736 8,964,597 FY20 1,114,638 328,512 1,443,150 7,905,527 FY21 1,177,646 279,425 1,457,071 6,790,889 FY22 1,238,325 227,108 1,465,433 5,613,243 FY23 1,310,011 170,913 1,480,924 4,374,918 FY24 996,023 118,946 1,114,969 3,064,907 FY25 1,050,489 71,796 1,122,285 2,068,884 FY26 820,956 28,148 849,104 1,018,395 FY27 197,439 4,442 201,882 197,439 2 500 000 Electric Fund Debt Service 0 250,000 500,000 750,000 1,000,000 1,250,000 1,500,000 1,750,000 2,000,000 2,250,000 2,500,000 FY12FY13FY14FY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26FY27PRINCIPAL INTEREST 140 WATER SERVICES CITY OF COLLEGE STATION City Manager Deputy City Manager Director Assistant Director Environmental & Training Manager Lead Environmental Technician Environmental Technicians Program Coordinator Plant Operations Superintendent Support Staff Water Production Supervisor Operators SCADA Systems Analyst Technicians Lead Electrician Electrician Wastewater Treatment Supervisor Lead Operators Operators Asset System Administrator Graduate Civil Engineer Field Operations Superintendent Supervisors Crew Leader Operators GIS Analyst 141 City of College Station Water Fund Fund Summary 11/4/11 3:07 PM FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 % Change in FY10 Revised Year-End Approved Approved Budget from Actual Budget Estimate Base Budget Budget FY11 to FY12 REVENUES Residential 9,361,705$ * 7,765,280$ * 8,888,660$ 8,081,000$ 8,081,000$ 4.07% Commercial/ Industrial 2,950,130 * 5,104,128 * 5,769,400 5,214,000 5,214,000 2.15% Other Operating 321,035 325,433 306,000 330,000 330,000 1.40% Investment Earnings 73,569 100,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 -25.00% Other Non-Operating 86,204 73,000 101,200 80,000 80,000 9.59% Total Revenues 12,792,643$ 13,367,841$ 15,140,260$ 13,780,000$ 13,780,000$ 3.08% EXPENDITURES AND TRANSFERS Production** 1,947,871$ 2,274,416$ 2,347,528$ 2,445,248$ 2,403,768$ 5.69% Distribution** 1,977,831 2,121,846 1,984,850 2,035,083 2,031,083 -4.28% Direct Capital** 55,704 127,950 72,000 93,025 93,025 -27.30% General & Administrative Transfers 1,735,923 1,664,893 1,664,893 1,818,031 1,818,031 9.20% Other (618) - - - - N/A Total Operating Expenditures & Transfers 5,716,711$ 6,189,105$ 6,069,271$ 6,391,387$ 6,345,907$ 2.53% NONOPERATING EXPENDITURES Economic Development 12,500$ 12,500$ 12,500$ 12,500$ -$ -100.00% Debt Service - URB 3,923,216 3,427,408 3,337,690 2,464,150 2,464,150 -28.10% Debt Service - CO's 1,008,315 1,059,514 1,059,514 1,068,095 1,068,095 0.81% Debt Service - Refunding: GO's - 537,975 537,975 1,264,400 1,264,400 135.03% Capital Projects 4,000,000 5,250,000 5,750,000 1,950,000 1,950,000 -62.86% Contingency - 32,588 5,655 50,000 50,000 53.43% Return on Investment 1,408,505 1,295,000 1,295,000 1,333,850 1,333,850 3.00% Total Nonoperating Expenditures 10,352,536$ 11,614,985$ 11,998,334$ 8,142,995$ 8,130,495$ -30.00% Total Expenditures & Transfers 16,069,247$ 17,804,090$ 18,067,605$ 14,534,382$ 14,476,402$ -18.69% Increase/Decrease in Working Capital, modified accrual budgetary basis (3,276,604)$ (4,436,249)$ (2,927,345)$ (754,382)$ (696,402)$ gy (,,)(,,)(,,)(,)(,) Measurement Focus Adjustment (2,550,901)$ Beginning Working Capital, accrual basis of accounting 11,388,792$ 5,561,287$ 5,561,287$ 2,633,942$ 2,633,942$ Ending Working Capital, accrual basis of accounting 5,561,287$ 1,125,038$ 2,633,942$ 1,879,560$ 1,937,540$ *In FY11, the account coding for mulit-family customers was changed from residential to commercial/industrial, which resulted in a shift from residential to commercial/industrial in the categorization of the revenue. **Production, Distribution and Direct Capital make up the Operations & Maintenance portion of the Water Budget. Residential 58.64% Commercial/  Industrial 37.84% Other Operating 2.39% Investment  Earnings 0.54% Other Non‐ Operating 0.58% Water Fund ‐Sources Production*  16.60% Distribution*  14.03%Direct Capital*  0.64% General &  Administrative  Transfers  12.56% Debt Service  Transfer ‐URB  7.38% Debt Service  Transfer ‐CO's  8.73% Debt Service ‐ Refunding:  GO's 13.47% Capital Projects  0.35% Contingency  9.21% Water  Fund ‐Uses 142 City of College Station Water Fund Operations & Maintenance Summary EXPENDITURE BY DIVISION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Production 1,947,871$ 2,268,761$ 2,347,528$ 2,445,248$ 2,403,768$ 5.95% Distribution 1,977,831 2,121,846 1,984,850 2,035,083 2,031,083 -4.28% Direct Capital 55,704 127,950 72,000 93,025 93,025 -27.30% TOTAL 3,981,406$ 4,518,557$ 4,404,378$ 4,573,356$ 4,527,876$ 0.21% EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Salaries & Benefits 1,715,746$ 1,832,140$ 1,726,924$ 1,773,534$ 1,773,534$ -3.20% Supplies 473,328 469,375 488,836 534,122 492,642 4.96% Maintenance 87,423 88,788 85,301 85,419 85,419 -3.79% Purchased Services 1,457,750 1,813,926 1,839,468 1,879,256 1,879,256 3.60% Other Purchased Services 191,455 186,378 191,849 208,000 204,000 0.00% Direct Capital 55,704 127,950 72,000 93,025 93,025 -27.30% TOTAL 3,981,406$ 4,518,557$ 4,404,378$ 4,573,356$ 4,527,876$ 0.21% PERSONNEL Revised Approved Approved % Change in Actual Actual Budget Base Budget Budget Budget from FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Production 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.00% Distribution 24.00 24.00 24.50 23.00 23.00 0.00% TOTAL 29.00 29.00 29.50 28.00 28.00 -5.08% Service Level Adjustments One -Time Recurring Total Discontinuation of Fluoridation -$ (41,480)$ (41,480)$ Reduction of Conservation Rebate Program - (4,000) (4,000) Water Services Total -$ (45,480)$ (45,480)$ 143 WATER FUND WATER OPERATIONS Description & Budget Explanation: The Water Operations Division is responsible for the supply and delivery of water. Program Name: Water Production & Distribution Service Level: Provide reliable water service to the citizens of College Station. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Average customer outage duration in minutes for the previous 12 months. 5.96 8.00 8.00 8.00 - Average outage time in hours experienced per interruption. 1.26 1.00 1.00 1.00 - Average number of outages experienced per customer. 0.0019 0.03 0.03 0.03 - Compliance with all regulatory requirements. 100% 100% 100% 100% - Compliance with all water quality monitoring requirements. 100% 100% 100% 100% Efficiency - Maintain O & M cost within +/- 10% of $1.27 per 1,000 gal. $0.96 $1.43 $1.43 $1.43 - Percent of unaccounted water 5% 10% 10% 10% Output - Number of new services completed. 396 1,230 1,230 1,230 - Number of water meters tested. 2,009 1,600 1,600 1,600 Service Level: Provide education and incentives to increase awareness of water and wastewater system, and reduce overall per capita consumption. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Annual per person (capita) water use per day.131 140 140 140 - Avoided water and wastewater consumption through direct conservation programs (million gallons)N/A 3.0 3.0 3.0 Output - Total number of customers contacted through all outreach and training programs.1,768 7,000 7,000 7,000 -Total number of customers trained on water and wastewater resource issues 260 1,000 1,000 1,000 144  Debt Service Requirements Water Fund All URB Series FISCAL YEAR PRINICIPAL INTEREST FISCAL YEAR PAYMENT PRINCIPAL OUTSTANDING OCT. 1 FY12 1,475,068 989,082 2,464,151 22,226,519 FY13 1,414,163 913,694 2,327,857 20,751,450 FY14 1,477,170 840,439 2,317,609 19,337,287 FY15 1,536,607 763,794 2,300,401 17,860,116 FY16 1,614,241 688,896 2,303,137 16,323,509 FY17 1,594,123 617,488 2,211,611 14,709,268 FY18 1,387,609 552,968 1,940,576 13,115,145 FY19 1,160,566 498,863 1,659,429 11,727,536 FY20 1,221,812 447,454 1,669,266 10,566,970 FY21 1,292,409 392,699 1,685,108 9,345,158 FY22 1,361,226 334,208 1,695,434 8,052,748 FY23 1,439,399 271,675 1,711,074 6,691,522 FY24 1,514,675 204,892 1,719,566 5,252,123 FY25 1,598,638 133,999 1,732,637 3,737,449 FY26 1,289,822 67,831 1,357,652 2,138,810 FY27 848,989 19,102 868,091 848,989 4,000,000 4,500,000 Water  Debt Service 0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,500,000 FY12FY13FY14FY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26FY27INTEREST PRINICIPAL 145 City of College Station Wastewater Fund Fund Summary FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 % Change in FY10 Revised Year-End Approved Approved Budget from Actual Budget Estimate Base Budget Budget FY11 to FY12 REVENUES Residential 9,424,604$ 9,801,697$ 10,177,590$ 10,038,000$ 10,406,594$ 6.17% Commercial/ Industrial 1,892,613 2,040,350 2,000,790 2,036,000 2,110,257 3.43% Other Operating 173,560 207,143 150,000 165,000 165,000 -20.34% Investment Earnings 65,025 114,000 60,000 52,000 52,000 -54.39% Other Non-Operating 30,551 40,000 40,000 41,000 41,000 2.50% Total Revenues 11,586,353$ 12,203,190$ 12,428,380$ 12,332,000$ 12,774,851$ 4.68% EXPENDITURES AND TRANSFERS Sewer Treatment*3,049,734$ 3,175,690$ 3,205,753$ 3,263,994$ 3,263,994$ 2.78% Sewer Collection*2,052,323 1,950,930 1,866,804 1,929,479 2,061,479 5.67% Direct Capital*53,639 134,710 100,000 60,710 60,710 -54.93% Gen/Admin Transfer 978,555 1,026,513 1,026,513 1,150,749 1,150,749 12.10% Other - - 120,000 - - N/A Total Operating Expeditures and Transfers 6,134,251$ 6,287,843$ 6,319,070$ 6,404,932$ 6,536,932$ 3.96% NONOPERATING EXPENDITURES Economic Development 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ -$ -100.00% Debt Service - URB 3,852,722 3,234,796 3,153,981 2,216,577 2,216,577 -31.48% Debt Service - CO's 477,193 496,928 491,064 731,240 731,240 47.15% Debt Service - Refunding: GO's - 471,713 471,713 1,166,650 1,166,650 147.32% Capital Projects 2,700,000 825,000 2,625,000 1,120,000 1,120,000 35.76% Other (486) - - - - N/A Contingency - - 25,528 50,000 50,000 N/A Return on Investment 1,219,722 1,171,400 1,171,400 1,206,542 1,206,542 3.00% Total Nonoperating Expenditures 8,269,151$ 6,219,837$ 7,958,686$ 6,511,009$ 6,491,009$ 4.36% Total Expenditures and Transfers 14,403,402$ 12,507,680$ 14,277,756$ 12,915,941$ 13,027,941$ 4.16% Increase/Decrease in Working Capital, gp, modified accrual budgetary basis (2,817,049)$ (304,490)$ (1,849,376)$ (583,941)$ (253,090)$ Measurement Focus Adjustment (482,626)$ - Beginning Working Capital, accrual basis of accounting 7,120,107$ 3,820,432$ 3,820,432$ 1,971,056$ 1,971,056$ Ending Working Capital, accrual basis of accounting 3,820,432$ 3,515,942$ 1,971,056$ 1,387,115$ 1,717,966$ * Sewer Treatment, Sewer Collection and Direct Capital make up the Operations & Maintenance portion of the Wastewater Budget. Residential 81.72% Commercial/  Industrial 16.57% Other Operating 1.30% Investment  Earnings 0.41% Wastewater Fund ‐Sources Sewer Treatment* 25.05% Sewer Collection* 15.82%Direct Capital* 0.47% Gen/Admin  Transfer 8.83% Debt Service  Transfer ‐URB 5.61% Debt Service  Transfer ‐CO's 8.95% Debt Service ‐ Refunding: GO's 8.60% Capital Projects 0.38% Contingency 9.26% Wastewater Fund ‐Uses 146 City of College Station Wastewater Fund Operations & Maintenance Summary EXPENDITURE BY DIVISION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Sewer Treatment 3,049,734$ 3,141,290$ 3,205,753$ 3,263,994$ 3,263,994$ 3.91% Sewer Collection 2,052,323 1,931,057 1,866,804 1,929,479 2,061,479 6.75% Direct Capital 53,639 134,710 100,000 60,710 60,710 -54.93% TOTAL 5,155,696$ 5,207,057$ 5,172,557$ 5,254,183$ 5,386,183$ 3.44% EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Salaries & Benefits 2,670,317$ 2,809,161$ 2,770,719$ 2,840,775$ 2,840,775$ 1.13% Supplies 566,931 599,236 643,073 643,143 643,143 7.33% Maintenance 159,506 158,492 158,749 156,978 156,978 -0.96% Purchased Services 1,705,303 1,505,458 1,500,016 1,552,577 1,684,577 11.90% Direct Capital 53,639 134,710 100,000 60,710 60,710 -54.93% TOTAL 5,155,696$ 5,207,057$ 5,172,557$ 5,254,183$ 5,386,183$ 3.44% PERSONNEL Revised Approved Approved % Change in Actual Actual Budget Base Budget Budget Budget from FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Sewer Treatment 25.00 25.00 26.00 26.00 26.00 0.00% Sewer Collection 24.00 24.00 24.00 23.00 23.00 -4.17% TOTAL 49.00 49.00 50.00 49.00 49.00 -2.00% Service Level Adjustments One -Time Recurring Total Interceptor Cleaning/Evaluation Program -$ 132,000$ 132,000$ Wastewater Total -$ 132,000$ 132,000$ 147 WASTEWATER FUND WASTEWATER OPERATIONS Description & Budget Explanation: The Wastewater Operations Division is responsible for the collection and treatment of wastewater in the City. Program Name: Wastewater Collection & Treatment Service Level: Provide reliable wastewater service to the citizens of College Station. Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimated Approved Effectiveness -Average customer stoppage duration in minutes.23.15 40.00 40.00 40.00 -Average number of stoppages experienced per customer.0.00029 0.003 0.003 0.003 -Compliance with all Regulatory requirements.100%100%100%100% -Compliance with all water quality monitoring requirements.100%100%100%100% -Compliance with all permit reporting requirements.100%100%100%100% Efficiency -Maintain O & M cost (within +/- 10% of $1.85 /1,000 gal.)$2.09 $2.09 $2.09 $2.09 Output -Number of new services completed.377 1,140 1,140 1,140 148 Debt Service Requirements Wastewater All URB Series FISCAL YEAR PRINCIPAL INTEREST FISCAL YEAR PAYMENT PRINCIPAL OUTSTANDING OCT. 1 FY12 1,627,564 589,013 2,216,577 13,488,939 FY13 1,635,291 513,097 2,148,388 11,861,375 FY14 1,509,013 438,601 1,947,613 10,226,085 FY15 1,076,421 374,049 1,450,470 8,717,072 FY16 1,127,208 319,251 1,446,459 7,640,651 FY17 1,058,325 267,802 1,326,127 6,513,443 FY18 762,251 227,022 989,272 5,455,118 FY 19 440,364 201,493 641,858 4,692,867 FY 20 463,550 181,721 645,271 4,252,503 FY 21 489,944 160,710 650,655 3,788,953 FY 22 515,449 138,403 653,851 3,299,009 FY 23 545,590 114,561 660,151 2,783,560 FY 24 574,303 89,100 663,402 2,237,970 FY 25 605,873 62,124 667,997 1,663,667 FY 26 639,223 33,521 672,744 1,057,795 FY 27 418,571 9,418 427,989 418,572 2 500 000 Wastewater  Debt Service 0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 FY12FY13FY14FY15FY16FY17FY18FY 19FY 20FY 21FY 22FY 23FY 24FY 25FY 26FY 27PRINCIPAL INTEREST 149 Sanitation Fund  The Sanitation Fund is a user-fee self-supported enterprise fund that accounts for the activities of collecting and disposing of residential and commercial refuse in the City. This service includes once a week residential collection, once a week bulky item pickup, once a week brush/yard clippings pick up, and once per week recycling pick up. The recycling program and Clean Green activities are designed to help reduce the amount of solid waste deposited into the landfill. The Sanitation Fund also funds the street sweeping operations of the City. This fund is budgeted using the modified accrual basis of accounting and the current financial resources measurement focus. The budget measures the net change in working capital. The measurement focus adjustment to arrive at Actual 2010 Working Capital is necessary because the proprietary fund’s financial statements are prepared using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues for the Sanitation Fund are forecasted to be $7,242,423 in FY12. This is a increase of 1.90% from the FY11 revised budget and is due to minor growth projections for Residential and Commercial collections. Operating expenditures for FY12 are expected to increase by 6.67% from the FY11 revised budget. A portion of this increase is due to an increase in forecasted fuel costs as well as increased equipment replacement contribution amounts due to new EPA standards. The approved Return on Investment for FY12 is $709,987. The total FY12 approved expenditures for the Sanitation Fund are $7,430,014. Historically, the Sanitation Fund has provided funding for Keep Brazos Beautiful, an Outside Agency dedicated to beautification and litter abatement. Keep Brazos Beautiful funding in the amount of $50,240 is included in the FY12 Sanitation approved budget. 150 City of College Station Sanitation Fund Fund Summary FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 % Change in 11/4/11 3:11 PM FY10 Revised Year-End Approved Approved Budget from Actual Budget Estimate Base Budget Budget FY11 to FY12 REVENUES Residential 4,693,295$ 4,748,404$ 4,789,004$ 4,860,839$ 4,860,839$ 2.37% Commercial / Industrial 2,172,126 2,259,390 2,259,390 2,281,984 2,281,984 1.00% Other Operating 92,163 86,600 46,000 86,600 86,600 0.00% Investment Earnings 276,593 12,000 305,325 12,000 12,000 0.00% Other Non Operating 151,078 1,000 1,300 1,000 1,000 0.00% Total Revenues 7,385,255$ 7,107,394$ 7,401,019$ 7,242,423$ 7,242,423$ 1.90% EXPENDITURES AND TRANSFERS Residential*3,104,372$ 3,215,025$ 3,274,584$ 3,425,430$ 3,425,430$ 6.54% Commercial*2,259,386 2,402,669 2,360,619 2,537,180 2,537,180 5.60% General & Admin Transfers 535,425 561,716 561,716 627,177 627,177 11.65% Outside Agency Funding 53,240 50,240 50,240 50,240 50,240 0.00% Contingency - 70,410 - 80,000 80,000 13.62% Inventory Loss 647 - - - - N/A Total Operating Expenditures & Transfers 5,953,070$ 6,300,060$ 6,247,159$ 6,720,027$ 6,720,027$ 6.67% NONOPERATING EXPENDITURES Economic Development 12,500$ 12,500$ 12,500$ -$ -$ -100.00% Return on Investment 716,644 702,208 702,208 709,987 709,987 1.11% Debt Service 376,207 - - - - N/A Total Non Operating Expenditures 1,105,351$ 714,708$ 714,708$ 709,987$ 709,987$ -0.66% Total Operating & Non Operating Expenditures 7,058,421$ 7,014,768$ 6,961,867$ 7,430,014$ 7,430,014$ 5.92% Increase/Decrease in Working Capital, modified accrual budgetary basis 326,834$ 92,626$ 439,152$ (187,591)$ (187,591)$ Measurement Focus Adjustment (9,889,203)$ Beginning Working Capital, accrual basis of accounting 11,070,723$ 1,508,354$ 1,508,354$ 1,947,506$ 1,947,506$ Ending Working Capital, accrual basis of accounting 1,508,354$ 1,600,980$ 1,947,506$ 1,759,915$ 1,759,915$ *Residential and Commercial Operations make up the O&M portion of the Sanitation Fund budget Residential 67.12% Commercial /  Industrial 31.51% Other  Operating 1.20% Investment  Earnings 0.17% Other Non  Operating 0.01% Sanitation Fund ‐Sources Residential* 46.10%Commercial* 34.15% General &  Admin  Transfers 8.44% Outside Agency  Funding 0.68% Contingency 1.08% Return on  Investment 9.56% Sanitation Fund ‐Uses 151 City of College Station Sanitation Fund  Operations & Maintenance Summary EXPENDITURE BY DIVISION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Residential Collection 3,104,372$ 3,215,025$ 3,274,584$ 3,425,430$ 3,425,430$ 6.54% Commercial Collection 2,259,386 2,402,669 2,360,619 2,537,180 2,537,180 5.60% TOTAL 5,363,758$ 5,617,694$ 5,635,203$ 5,962,610$ 5,962,610$ 6.14% EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Salaries & Benefits 1,810,782$ 1,847,668$ 1,929,228$ 1,948,677$ 1,948,677$ 5.47% Supplies 329,197 360,856 416,726 433,442 433,442 20.11% Maintenance 441,937 459,701 458,888 479,725 479,725 4.36% Purchased Services 2,781,842 2,949,469 2,830,361 3,100,766 3,100,766 5.13% Capital Outlay - - - - N/A TOTAL 5,363,758$ 5,617,694$ 5,635,203$ 5,962,610$ 5,962,610$ 6.14% PERSONNEL Revised Approved Approved % Change in Actual Actual Budget Base Budget Budget Budget from FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Residential Collection 24.15 24.15 23.25 23.25 23.25 0.00% Commercial Collection 11.10 11.10 12.25 12.25 12.25 0.00% TOTAL 35.25 35.25 35.50 35.50 35.50 0.00% 152 PUBLIC WORKS SANITATION Description & Budget Explanation: The Sanitation Division is responsible for the collection of all municipal refuse, recycling and commercial refuse. Program Name: Residential Collection Service Level: Provide residential solid waste collection to College Station citizens. Performance Measures FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Percent of missed collection reports per week 0.08% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% Efficiency - No. of labor hours per ton of household garbage 0.83 1.7 1.7 1.7 - No. of labor hours per ton of bulky waste 2.72 4.9 4.9 4.9 - No. of labor hours per ton of Clean Green 3.29 6.5 6.5 6.5 - Cost per ton of household garbage $59.52 $80.00 $80.00 $80.00 - Cost per ton of bulky waste $194.65 $240.00 $240.00 $240.00 - Cost per ton of Clean Green $235.73 $320.00 $320.00 $320.00 - Residential monthly rate $14.40 $14.40 $14.40 $14.40 Output - No. of household tons collected 19,238 18,564 20,628 21,041 - No. of bulky tons collected 6,257 6,222 7,502 7,652 - No. of Clean Green tons collected 2,956 2,856 2,360 2,407 Program Name: Residential Recycling Service Level: Provide residential recycling collection to College Station citizens. Performance Measures FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Percent of missed collection reports per week 0.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% - Percent of Residential Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) diverted annually 16.77% 22.00% 22.00% 22.00% - Lbs. Collected per household 7.2 15 15 15 Efficiency - Cost per ton, recycling $277.14 $220.00 $220.00 $220.00 - Revenue per ton, recycling $45.76 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 - Net cost per ton, recycling (cost-revenues- avoided disposal costs)$208 $180 $180 $180 Output - No. of tons collected, recycling 1,053 1,159 1,182 1,206 - Avoided landfill costs $24,746 $29,808 $30,404 $31,012 Program Name: Commercial Collection Service Level: Provide sanitation to College Station businesses and apartments. Performance Measures FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Percent of missed collection reports 0.012% 1.000% 1.000% 1.000% Efficiency - Labor-hours per ton 0.71 1.00 1.00 1.00 - Cost per ton $50.87 $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 Output - No. of tons collected 36,558 39,735 35,880 36,598 153 Northgate Parking Enterprise Fund The Northgate Parking Enterprise Fund accounts for revenues and expenditures from the City’s Northgate parking facilities. These revenues come from the Patricia Street Promenade Surface Lot, the College Main Parking Garage, and metered street parking in the Northgate area. This fund is budgeted using the modified accrual basis of accounting and the current financial resources measurement focus. The budget measures the net change in working capital. The measurement focus adjustment to arrive at Actual 2010 Working Capital is necessary because the proprietary fund’s financial statements are prepared using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues from all parking fees and fines are estimated to be $1,142,343 in FY12. Total revenues in FY12 are estimated to be $1,159,689. Approved expenditures related to the parking operations performed by Northgate District Management staff are $448,597. This amount does not include estimated expenditures related to non-parking activities of $220,633, which will be covered by a transfer from the General Fund. Additionally, an $80,000 approved Service Level Adjustment (SLA) is included in the FY12 budget for the expansion of the video surveillance system located in the College Main Parking Garage. Currently, only the first level and stairwells of the parking garage are equipped with security cameras. This SLA will expand surveillance coverage to the remaining levels of the parking structure. Beginning in FY10, the Northgate Parking Enterprise Fund began to fully cover the debt service related to the College Main Parking Garage. The original Certificates of Obligation, issued in 2000, were refunded in FY10. The FY12 debt service payment after the debt refunding is $464,000. Total approved fund expenditures are $1,085,775. The FY12 estimated ending working capital is anticipated to increase 24% when compared to the FY11 estimated ending working capital. This is due, in part, the $220,633 transfer that will occur from the General Fund in FY12 to cover non- parking activities that occur in the fund. 154 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 % Change in FY10 Revised Year-End Approved Approved Budget from Actual Budget Estimate Base Budget Budget FY11 to FY12 REVENUES Parking Fees 977,902$ 1,014,692$ 965,084$ 997,394$ 997,394$ (1.70%) Parking Fines 162,932 160,000 144,949 144,949 144,949 (9.41%) Investment Earnings 11,381 17,529 17,529 11,346 11,346 (35.27%) Other 14,553 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 0.00% Total Revenues 1,166,768$ 1,198,221$ 1,133,562$ 1,159,689$ 1,159,689$ (3.22%) EXPENDITURES Parking Operations 581,749$ 642,391$ 611,371$ 448,597$ 448,597$ (30.17%) General & Administrative Transfers 103,067 98,736 98,736 91,529 91,529 (7.30%) Capital Outlay 37,286 508,383 428,353 - 80,000 (84.26%) Transfers 1,243 - - - - N/A Debt Service 518,864 863,000 863,000 464,000 464,000 (46.23%) Other 1,341 - - - - N/A Contingency - 1,352 - 1,649 1,649 21.97% Total Expenditures 1,243,550$ 2,113,862$ 2,001,460$ 1,005,775$ 1,085,775$ (48.64%) Increase/Decrease in Working Capital (76,782)$ (915,641)$ (867,898)$ 153,914$ 73,914$ Measurement focus adjustment 327,893$ Beginning Working Capital 926,286$ 1,177,397$ 1,177,397$ 309,499$ 309,499$ Ending Working Capital 1,177,397$ 261,756$ 309,499$ 463,413$ 383,413$ City of College Station Northgate Parking Enterprise Fund Fund Summary Northgate Parking Enterprise Fund UsesNorthgateParkingEnterpriseFund‐Sources Parking  Operations 41.3%G&A Transfers 8.4% Capital Outlay 7.4% Debt Service 42.7% Contingency 0.2% Northgate Parking Enterprise Fund ‐Uses Parking Fees 86.0% Parking Fines 12.5% Investment  Earnings 1.0% Other 0.5% Northgate Parking Enterprise Fund ‐Sources 155 City of College Station Northgate Parking Enterprise Fund Operations & Maintenance Summary Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Parking 619,033$ 1,147,980$ 1,039,724$ 448,596$ 528,596$ (53.95%) TOTAL 619,033$ 1,147,980$ 1,039,724$ 448,596$ 528,596$ (53.95%) Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Salaries & Benefits 271,739$ 306,119$ 282,773$ 181,938 181,938$ (40.57%) Supplies 12,530 18,171 20,595 10,866 10,866 (40.20%) Maintenance 34,743 50,444 40,641 18,239 18,239 (63.84%) Purchased Services 262,735 264,893 267,362 237,553 237,553 (10.32%) General Capital 37,286 508,353 428,353 - 80,000 (84.26%) TOTAL 619,033$ 1,147,980$ 1,039,724$ 448,596$ 528,596$ (53.95%) Revised Approved Approved % Change in Actual Actual Budget Base Budget Budget Budget from FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Parking 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 0.00% TOTAL 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 0.00% Service Level Adjustments One-Time Recurring Total Parking Parking Garage Camera Expansion 80,000$ -$ 80,000$ Parking SLA TOTAL 80,000$ -$ 80,000$ EXPENDITURE BY DIVISION EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION PERSONNEL 156 NORTHGATE PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND NORTHGATE DISTRICT MANAGEMENT Description & Budget Explanation: The Northgate District Management Division is responsible for the operations of and coordinating efforts to promote the Northgate District to citizens and visitors alike. The Northgate District has been one of the key City Council issues in recent years. Line of Business: Asset Management, Protection and Maintenance Service Levels:1) Manage twenty-four (24) hour operations of revenue producing parking assets 2) Clean public parking facilities daily 3) Manage third-party contracts involving maintaining City assets in Northgate 4) Maintain aesthetic condition of entire District daily 5) Deploy directional traffic devices effectively and efficiently Performance Measures FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimated Approved Effectiveness - Percent of Revenue-Producing Assets in excellent condition 60% 80% 80% 95% - Percent of Non-Parking Assets in excellent condition 90% 90% 90% 95% - Percent Barricades deployed on-time and without incident N/A 90% 90% 93% Output - Dollars spent improving assets - $364,500 $345,353.00 $250,000 - Dollars spent maintaining assets $50,000.00 $45,000 40,000 $30,000 Line of Business: District Administration Service Levels:1) Administration of Division budgets and fiscal reporting documents 2) Provide assistance to stakeholders pursuing assorted projects in the District per year 3) Manage approximately fifty (50) community service workers per year Performance Measures FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimated Approved Efficiency - Expenditure to revenue ratio (dollars spent : dollars returned) - $1.35 : $1.00 $1.26 : $1.00 $1.13 : $1.00 - Percentage of hours spent on non-parking related operations - 30% 43% 45% Output -Number of community service work hours supervised N/A 240 400 480 -Value of community service worker hours N/A - $5,516.00 $6,620.00 157 Line of Business: Parking Services and Enforcement Service Levels:1) Manage transient and contracted parking patron's needs 2) Administer parking enforcement activities throughout the District 3) Respond to parking facility questions and complaints 4) Maintain all equipment related to parking services Performance Measures FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimated Approved Effectiveness - Percentage dispatched parking complaints responded within 30 m N/A 85% 85% 90% - Percentage of parking citations paid N/A 74% 59% 75% - Ratio of transactions to number of citations issued 42 : 1 48 : 1 67 : 1 68 : 1 -Ratio of total transactions to pre-paid transactions N/A - - 10 : 1 -Ratio of citations issued vs. dismissed 55 : 1 58 : 1 63 : 1 65 : 1 -Ratio of online purchases : other contract purchases N/A N/A 15 : 1 25 : 1 Output -Number of long-term parking passes purchased N/A 325 385 400 -Number of online contract purchases N/A N/A N/A 100 -Number of updated public communications efforts N/A 2 2 4 -Number of pre-paid parking passes purchased N/A N/A 1,500 3,500 Line of Business: Organization and Management of Special Events Service Levels:1) Support the planning and coordination of special events in the District Performance Measures FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimated Approved Output -No. of special events organized - - 3 2 -No. in attendance annually at special events - - 200 1,500 Line of Business: Creation of a Quality Customer Experience Service Levels:1) Administers necessary resources to contract security services for College Main Garage 2) Manage and execute the safe and timely clearing of the Parking Garage 3) Facilitate effective surveillance and assist other Departments in preventing and/or solving crime 4) Coordinate the monitoring and reporting of various code violations to the appropriate Department Performance Measures FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimated Approved Efficiency - Ratio of Total Parking Transactions to number of Significant Activity Reports generated by the Police --- 10,000 : 1 - Percent of time in which garage is cleared within 1 hour of bars closing -75% 80% 90% Output -No. of proposed customer service enhancements identified --3 5 by District. - No. of work incident reports --10 8 158 Utilities  Capital Projects Budget  On an annual basis, the City of College Station prepares a five-year Capital Improvements Program (CIP). The CIP is presented for City Council review as part of the annual budget process. The program consolidates all anticipated capital needs for which funding authorization exists. The program is divided into several sections depending on the services provided and the funding source. Two categories of capital expenditures are defined by the City. The first category of capital expenditure is for major capital projects. Major capital projects are projects that cost more than $50,000 and provide a fixed asset or equipment that has a useful life of three years or more. The second category of capital expenditure is for minor capital projects. Minor capital projects are projects that cost more than $5,000 and less than $50,000 and provide a fixed asset or equipment that has a useful life of three years or more. Traditionally, utility revenue bonds are issued when there is a need for financing capital construction or acquisition and when the asset will reside in one or more of the City's enterprise funds. The City's enterprise funds include Electric, Water, Wastewater and Sanitation. In FY11, based on the recommendations from the City’s financial advisors, Certificates of Obligation were issued in lieu of utility revenue bonds. In FY12, either Utility Revenue Bonds or Certificates of Obligation will be issued for Utility capital projects. Generally, Certificates of Obligation and Utility Revenue Bonds do not require voter approval. The debt will be repaid from revenues generated by the utilities. Funds in the amount of $8,825,000 are estimated to be issued for Electric capital projects in FY12, $6,100,000 is estimated to be issued for Water capital projects in FY12 and $7,580,000 is estimated to be issued for Wastewater capital projects in FY12. Among the decisions and proposals that accompany capital project recommendations is an analysis of potential ongoing costs and any potential impact on utility rates that a project may have. UTILITY CAPITAL PROJECTS Below are descriptions of the utility capital projects included in the FY12 Approved Budget. The funds expended on these projects are considered significant and nonroutine. Electric Capital Projects  $9,571,100 is the approved budgeted appropriation for electric capital projects in FY12. Funds in the amount of $3,000,000 are budgeted for Production projects in FY12. It is anticipated that these funds will be used for a methane gas production project at the Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency (BVSWMA) landfill. $650,000 is included for General Plant projects. These include the replacement of the mapping system, enhancements to the SCADA system and plant upgrades. Also included is $250,000 for the design of renovations to the Utility Service Center Building. Funds in the amount of $1,160,000 are estimated for Overhead System Improvement projects. These funds will be used for the construction of overhead feeder extensions and upgrades of existing overhead electric infrastructure. This includes the annual utility pole replacement program. Funds in the amount of $1,150,000 are estimated for Underground System Improvement projects. These funds will be used for the construction of new underground electric projects and for conversion of overhead power lines to underground. $1,380,000 is included in the approved budget for New Service and System Extension projects. These funds will be used to provide electrical system services for new customer additions (residential, commercial, apartments and subdivisions). $95,000 is included in the approved budget for Residential Street Lighting projects. These funds are used for new residential street lighting projects and improvement to existing residential street lighting. Funds in the amount of $150,000 are estimated for Thoroughfare Street Lighting projects. These funds will be used are for new thoroughfare street lighting projects and improvements to existing thoroughfare street lights. $759,000 is included in the approved budget for Distribution projects and $1,175,000 is included for Transmission projects. These funds will be used for the construction of electric transmission and distribution projects to provide electric capacity to the City of College Station. Major substation replacement equipment is included in this funding. The FY12 Approved Budget includes a projected debt issue of $8,825,000 for Electric Utility capital projects. Water Capital Projects In FY12, $8,456,117 is the approved new appropriation included for water capital projects. Appropriations from prior years carry forward on capital projects. In some cases, the total new appropriations exceed the total estimate for capital expenditures because the new appropriations may cover not only the current fiscal year, but future fiscal years as well. The new appropriations included for FY12 exceed the FY12 projected expenditures for this reason. Total expenditures in FY12 for Water capital projects are projected to be $8,033,942. Water Production projects include an estimated FY12 expenditure 159 of $5,728,440. $800,000 is included for the purchase of land for future well sites. As capacity needs grow, the City is preparing for the construction of new wells. A component of this is the land acquisition for new future wells. An estimated $418,000 is included for the Sandy Point Chemical System Replacement project. The chemical feed and storage facilities at Sandy Point Pump Station require upgrading to accommodate current expansion of the water production infrastructure and to be in compliance with current fire codes. As part of the project, the existing chlorine disinfection system will be replaced to improve personnel safety, operating reliability and cost efficiency. $3,116,645 is included for high service water pump improvements. This project will increase the pumping capacity of the Dowling Road Pump Station. This project is in response to analysis of the water system capacities in relation to Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) requirements. It is anticipated that these improvements will be completed in FY13. $625,000 is included in the approved budget for the Cooling Tower Expansion project. This project is for the design and construction of an additional water cooling tower and all of the associated appurtenances to connect this new equipment into the existing system. The additional tower is needed to meet the increased production capacity of the water system. $371,295 is included for the completion of the 3 Million Gallon Ground Storage Reservoir (MG GSR) Rehabilitation project. As part of this project, the interior coating of the reservoir will be replaced and some structural upgrades will be made to ensure that it meets TCEQ guidelines. In addition, $45,000 is included for the design of the same improvements at the 5 Million Gallon Ground Storage Reservoir (MG GSR). $37,500 is included for the design of renovations at the Utility Service Center. The cost of the renovations is being shared by the Electric, Water and Wastewater utilities as all three are housed in this facility. It is anticipated that the renovations will occur in future fiscal years. $25,000 is projected for the continuation of the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) man machine interface project. This project is for the evaluation, procurement and implementation of software packages available to improve the SCADA man machine interface or graphical software. New servers are included to increase flexibility and reduce vulnerabilities and down time. An additional $50,000 is included for Well #7 Fiber. This project is for the installation of fiber from Sandy Point pump station to Water Well #7 to create wireless access point for Water Wells #5, #6, #8 and future wells. Finally, $240,000 is included for the Water Redundant Communications project. This project is for data communication improvements. These improvements will allow for built-in redundancy, wireless communications, mobile work force and unforeseen communication plans not related to construction projects. The main focus is to construct fiber loops which provide multiple paths to all facilities. Funds in the amount of $997,500 are projected to be expended on Water Distribution projects in FY12. This includes $100,000 of general Oversize Participation (OP) funds. These funds are used to help meet future capacity needs by oversizing water lines above the minimum size required to serve a development. $557,000 is the projected FY12 expenditure for the Wellborn Widening project. This project was for the relocation of water lines outside of pavement areas in conjunction with Wellborn Widening. This final phase should be completed in FY12. A portion of the expenditures for this project will be reimbursed by TxDOT. It is estimated that approximately $1,000,000 will be received in FY13 following the completion of the project. Approximately $2,400,000 was received in FY10 for a portion of the project that has already been completed. $108,500 is the estimated FY12 expenditure for the Raymond Stotzer West Water Line project. This project is for the design and construction of water infrastructure to provide service to an area that was annexed by the City of College Station in 1995. This area is near the intersection of Raymond Stotzer West and FM 2818. In addition, $137,000 is included for the City of Bryan Raymond Stotzer Phase I water line. This project will consist of the construction of a 12" waterline along Health Science Center Parkway from FM 47 to Turkey Creek Road, and for the construction of a 16" waterline along F&B Road from Turkey Creek Road to FM 2818. This project will be designed and constructed by the City of Bryan, but will be paid for by the City of College Station. This project is a component of the Bio-Medical Corridor agreement. Finally, $95,000 is estimated in FY12 for the construction of an 8-inch water distribution line to serve the necessary fire protection for the approved Carter Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (CCWWTP) Lab/SCADA building. Rehabilitation projects included in the FY12 Approved Budget include $634,150 for the South Knoll/The Glade project. This project is for the replacement of water lines in the area bounded by Haines, Southwest Parkway, Glade and Langford. These aging lines were identified in a 2003 water study as in need of replacement. In addition, $78,534 has been included for the completion of the Southwood 5-7 project. Construction on this project began in FY11 and should be completed in FY12. This project is for the replacement of water lines in an area bounded by Southwest Parkway, Harvey Mitchell Parkway, Welsh and Shadowood. Other rehabilitation projects include the Cooner Street Rehabilitation project and the Plantation Oaks Water Line Rehabilitation project. The Cooner Street Rehabilitation project includes the rehabilitation of water and wastewater lines and paving along Cooner Street from Texas Avenue to the street terminus. The water distribution lines are in need of replacement due to an increase in service disruptions caused by deteriorating lines. The FY12 estimate is for the design of the project. Funding for the majority of the cost of the project design will come from Community Development Block Grant funds. Construction of the water portion of the project, which will follow in FY13, will be paid for with water utility revenue. The Plantation Oaks Water Line Rehabilitation project is for the rehabilitation of a 12-inch water line along 160 Harvey Rd, between Scarlett O’Hara Drive and Munson Avenue. This segment of the line is being replaced due to continuing failures that are causing service disruptions to customers in this area. Contingency in the amount of $150,000 has been included in the FY12 Approved Budget. These funds will be available for use on unanticipated projects as well as to offset project overruns. Finally, $150,000 has been included for the meter replacement program that was implemented in FY08. This program is for the replacement of water meters on a routine basis to ensure efficient water readings. The FY12 Approved Budget includes an estimated $1,950,000 in current revenues that will be transferred from operations to fund water capital projects. Additionally, a debt issue of $6,100,000 is projected in FY12 for Water capital projects. Wastewater Capital Projects The FY12 Approved Budget includes $4,815,757 in new appropriations for numerous wastewater capital projects. Appropriations from prior years carry forward on capital projects. Therefore, the projected expenditures exceed the new appropriations included for FY12. Total expenditures in FY12 for Wastewater capital projects are projected to be $9,144,828. Wastewater Collection projects include $100,000 for oversize participation and planning. These funds are available to meet future anticipated capacity in the construction of wastewater lines above the minimum size needed to serve the development. An estimate of $325,000 is included for the East Side FM 158 Sewer Line project. This project will construct gravity sewer lines, lift station and forced main to serve properties along FM 158 south of the intersection with FM 30 in service territory acquired from the City of Bryan and within the City of Bryan's corporate limits. This project is the result of a service territory swap coordinated as part of the Bio-Medical Corridor agreement. Design of the line is estimated to begin in FY12 with construction following in FY13 and FY14. $44,965 has been estimated in FY12 for upgrades to the wastewater infrastructure that are being completed as part of the Victoria Avenue Extension project. In FY12, $934,758 is the estimated expenditure for the Scott and White Sewer Line/Lift Station project. This project consists of the design, construction, and land acquisition required for a new lift station facility (on the Scott & White property) and a force main along State Highway 6 that will connect to the Spring Creek trunk line. Funding for this project will come from the Economic Development Fund, from Scott and White and from wastewater utility revenue. Funding is also included in the FY12 approved budget for the design of the Bee Creek Parallel Trunkline. The existing Bee Creek Trunkline sub-basin currently serves areas along FM2818, from areas north of Wellborn Road to the Carters Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant. This project will install a gravity line to increase the system capacity of the Bee Creek Trunkline sub-basin to accept the ultimate build-out demand anticipated in this respective area. This project is expected to span several years with construction being completed in FY14. $225,000 is included in the approved budget for the design of the FM 2154 Sewer Trunkline. This project is for the design, easement acquisition and construction of a gravity sanitary sewer line along the east side of FM2154, a lift station in the proximity of the intersection of FM2154/Greens Prairie Trail and a force main along the south side of Greens Prairie Trail. This project is also expected to span several fiscal years, with completion estimated for FY15. Rehabilitation projects included in the FY12 Approved Budget include South Knoll/The Glade. This project is for the replacement of wastewater lines in the area bounded by Haines, Southwest Parkway, Glade and Langford. These aging lines were identified in a 2003 water study as in need of replacement. In addition, $136,331 has been included for the completion of the Southwood 5-7 project. Construction on this project began in FY11 and should be completed in FY12. This project is for the replacement of wastewater lines in an area bounded by Southwest Parkway, Harvey Mitchell Parkway, Welsh and Shadowood. Also included in the FY12 Approved Budget is the Cooner Street Rehabilitation project. The Cooner Street Rehabilitation project includes the rehabilitation of water and wastewater lines and paving along Cooner Street. The sanitary sewer lines are in need of replacement due to an increase in service disruptions caused by deteriorating lines. The FY12 estimate is for the design of the project. Funding for the majority of the cost of the project design will come from Community Development Block Grant funds. Construction of the wastewater portion of the project, which will follow in FY13, will be paid for with wastewater utility revenue. Finally, funds in the amount of $309,029 are included in the approved budget for the Northeast Trunkline Rehabilitation. A study conducted in 2010 identified major defects within the Northeast Trunkline. The intent of this project is to repair/replace the most critical segments of this interceptor. Funds in the amount of $3,271,047 have been estimated for Treatment and Disposal projects. $924,509 is included for the Carter Creek Headworks Improvements project. This project will replace or refurbish components of the existing headworks that have become unserviceable. $167,000 is the projected expenditure for the construction of catwalks around the Lick Creek clarifiers. The catwalks will provide safe access for the operators to operate and maintain the clarifiers. An estimated $155,000 is included for centrifuge improvements at the Lick Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (LCWWTP). Improvements include installing a larger sludge discharge hopper, a sludge conveyor and a work platform around the 161 centrifuge. $156,100 is included for completion of the Lick Creek Sludge Holding Tank Improvements. This project will ultimately expand the size of the waste sludge holding tank at the Lick Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant. An additional $168,438 is estimated for the completion of the Lick Creek Return Activated Sludge Modifications project. The Return Activated Sludge Pumps are not consistently pumping return activated sludge at an appropriate rate. This is a critical function essential to meeting TCEQ mandated treatment requirements. This project will reconfigure the sludge piping so that the pumps will perform acceptably. $200,000 is included for the Lick Creek Sludge Blower Replacement project. This project will replace the current blower units which are at the end of their service life. New blowers are needed to maintain quality of sludge during storage prior to dewatering. $850,000 is included for the Lick Creek Centrifuge Replacement project. This project will replace the sludge dewatering centrifuge at the LCWWTP. The current centrifuge has exceeded its useful life. An estimated $650,000 is included for the Carter Creek Digested Sludge Aerator Replacement project. This project will replace the current aeration diffusers in Digested Sludge Holding Tanks #1 and #2 at the CCWWTP. Continued failures of the existing diffusers make replacement essential. Funds in the amount of $34,768 are estimated for the SCADA replacement project. This project will replace the control equipment that has exceeded its useful life. $592,808 is the projected expenditure for the completion of the Carters Creek Lab and SCADA Building project. The existing building no longer meets laboratory standards. In addition, $99,006 is estimated for Process Control Improvements at LCWWTP. This project will be for the purchase and installation of improved process control instrumentation at the Plant. An additional $117,259 has been included in FY12 for the installation of SCADA at the new lift stations. This will allow for monitoring and alarming of the new lift stations. $120,000 is included for the Carter Creek Fiber Ring project. This project will provide for data communication improvements that will allow for built-in redundancy, wireless communications, mobile work force, and unforeseen communication plans not related to construction projects. The main focus is to construct fiber loops which provide multiple paths to all facilities. $37,500 is included for the design of renovations at the Utility Service Center. The cost of the renovations is being shared by the Electric, Water and Wastewater utilities as all three are housed in the facility. It is anticipated that the renovations will occur in future fiscal years. Finally, $111,172 is included for the Aggie Acres Fiber Optic Conduit project. This project will connect the Aggie Acres lift station in the ETJ to the City's sewer system. Finally, contingency in the amount of $150,000 has been included in the FY12 Approved Budget. These funds will be available for use on unanticipated projects as well as to offset project overruns. A total of $1,120,000 in current revenues from operations is estimated to be used to fund Wastewater capital projects. Additionally, a debt issue of $7,580,000 is projected in FY12 for wastewater capital projects. ADDITIONAL O&M COSTS The City of College Station strives to provide superior electric, water, and wastewater services to its citizens. Part of this effort includes investment in the capital that makes up the infrastructure. These investments take place in the form of capital improvement projects. Some of these improvements require additional operating and maintenance (O&M) costs. These costs are identified and ultimately become part of the cost of providing these utility services. In some situations, the O&M cost of a project is minimal and can be absorbed by the City department that is benefiting the most from the project. In these situations, SLAs are submitted for the O&M needs of the capital projects and funding is considered as part of the budget process (i.e. for additional personnel). In some situations the anticipated O&M cost is added to the base budget (i.e. additional budget for utility costs). Several increases were made to the FY12 base budget for additional O&M costs related to new capital projects. Funds in the amount of $20,000 were included in the Water Production O&M budget for the electric utility costs related to phase I of the Water Reclamation project. This project should be completed in FY11. Budget was also included in the Water Production O&M budget for electric utility costs related to Well #8. Finally, budget was included in the Wastewater Treatment O&M budget for electric utility costs related to the Carters Creek Service Water Improvements project. Departments are expected to consider the impact of current and planned capital improvement projects on operations and maintenance (O&M) budgets. This analysis is a component of the 5-year Strategic Business Plans that are completed by all City departments. Projections as to the impact of capital projects on O&M budgets that are included in the Strategic Business Plans are used by the Finance Office in financial forecasting. A more detailed sheet at the end of this section reflects the estimated O&M costs associated with the utility capital projects. The departments will continue to evaluate current operations before increases in budget will be approved. 162 163 ELECTRIC SERVICE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 FY10-11 FY 09-10 REVISED FY 10-11 ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE BEGINNING FUND BALANCE:$994,199 $535,220 $831,557 UTILITY REVENUE BONDS/CO's $7,655,377 $5,410,000 $4,735,000 INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS (1,671) 6,000 6,000 OTHER - - - INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS - - 886,953 INTRAGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS - - - SUBTOTAL ADDITIONAL RESOURCES $7,653,706 $5,416,000 $5,627,953 TOTAL RESOURCES AVAILABLE $8,647,905 $5,951,220 $6,459,510 CAPITAL PROJECTS: PRODUCTION - - - GENERAL PLANT 168,398 1,050,000 1,050,000 OVERHEAD SYSTEM IMPROV. 1,194,338 1,100,000 1,060,000 UNDERGROUND SYSTEM IMPROV. 910,036 1,200,000 993,000 NEW SERVICES & SYSTEM EXT. 1,038,215 1,294,000 1,056,168 RES. STREET LIGHTING 365,040 85,000 86,000 THOR. STREET LIGHTING 589,541 250,000 247,000 ,,, DISTRIBUTION 2,460,530 523,000 690,000 TRANSMISSION 2,098,919 373,000 483,068 GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE 26,210 23,215 23,215 DEBT ISSUANCE COST 3,950 25,000 15,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 8,855,177$ 5,923,215$ 5,703,451$ MEASUREMENT FOCUS ADJUSTMENT 1,038,829$ ENDING FUND BALANCE:$831,557 $28,005 $756,059 164 ELECTRIC SERVICE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 FY11-12 APPROVED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED BUDGET FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 FY15-16 $756,059 $15,959 $9,959 $28,959 $3,959 $8,825,000 $9,115,000 $4,160,000 $4,200,000 $1,900,000 6,000 4,000 4,000 6,000 6,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3,500,000 $8,831,000 $9,119,000 $4,164,000 $4,206,000 $5,406,000 $9,587,059 $9,134,959 $4,173,959 $4,234,959 $5,409,959 3,000,000 - - - - 650,000 1,050,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 1,160,000 1,100,000 950,000 950,000 950,000 1,150,000 1,300,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,050,000 1,380,000 1,294,000 1,380,000 1,466,000 1,553,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 150,000 150,000 450,000 450,000 570,000 ,,,,, 759,000 1,981,000 75,000 75,000 1,075,000 1,175,000 2,100,000 - - - 22,100 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 30,000 30,000 20,000 20,000 10,000 9,571,100$ 9,125,000$ 4,145,000$ 4,231,000$ 5,378,000$ $15,959 $9,959 $28,959 $3,959 $31,959 165 WATER SERVICE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 FY12 REVISED APPROVED PROJECT WORK REQUEST APPROVED APPROPRIATIONS FY10 - 11 FY11 - 12 NUMBER NUMBER BUDGET THROUGH FY10 APPROPRIATIONS APPROPRIATIONS BEGINNING FUND BALANCE:74,998$ 74,998$ ADDITIONAL RESOURCES: UTILITY REVENUE BONDS/CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION 5,450,000$ 6,100,000$ INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 7,200 10,000 TRANSFERS FROM OPERATIONS 5,250,000 1,950,000 OTHER 130,000 48,000 SUBTOTAL ADDITIONAL RESOURCES 10,837,200$ 8,108,000$ TOTAL RESOURCES AVAILABLE 10,912,198$ 8,182,998$ PRODUCTION PROJECTS SOURCE AND SUPPLY PLANT - WSWOC LAND ACQUISITION - WELLS WT0206 WF0377324 5,862,507 6,667,217 - - WELL #9 TBD 3,846,000 - - - WELL #9 COLLECTION LINE WF1249597 1,875,000 25,000 - - WELL FIELD COLLECTION SYSTEM LOOP TBD 900,000 - - - WATER PUMPING AND TREATMENT PLANT - WPWOC - SANDY POINT CHEMICAL SYS REPLACEMENT -WF1440357 1,733,400 - - 1,733,400 HIGH SERVICE WATER PUMP IMPROVEMENTS -WF1223117 3,553,000 500,000 2,000,000 1,053,000 2010 WELL REHABILITATION -WF1241047 238,215 400,000 - - COOLING TOWER EXPANSION -WF1440344 3,182,000 - - 3,182,000 COOLING TOWER MEDIA REPLACEMENT -WF1343612 300,000 - 300,000 - WELLS 1,2,3, & 5 CONTROLS UPGRADE WF1337893 80,000 - 80,000 - 3 MG GSR REHAB WF1330166 408,745 - 400,000 8,745 5 MG GSR REHAB WF1440668 560,000 - - 80,000 WATER WELL SOFT STARTERS TBD 272,000 - - - WATER GENERAL PLANT - WGWOC - UTILITY SERVICE CENTER RENOVATIONS -WF1441516 348,000 - 37,500 - SCADA MAN MACHINE INTERFACE WF1442533 205,000 - 205,000 - WELL #7 FIBER WF1440359 50,000 - - 50,000 WATER REDUNDANT COMMUNICATIONS WF1440364 500,000 - - 500,000 CLOSED PROJECTS SUBTOTAL DISTRIBUTION PROJECTS TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION PLANT - WTWOC OVERSIZED PARTICIPATION -WF1366201 ANNUAL - 70,270 100,000 CASTLEGATE II, SECTION 200 -WF1366201/001 29,730 - 29,730 - WATER RECLAMATION PHASE I WT0110 WF0995711 3,362,000 3,606,730 - - WELLBORN WIDENING -WF0613546 4,540,115 4,250,000 600,194 - BARRON ROAD WATER SERVICE EXT -WF1325560 1,413,531 1,584,940 - - RAYMOND STOTZER WEST WATER LINE -WF1111167 890,000 1,000,000 - - COB RAYMOND STOTZER PH I WATER LINE WF1440674 1,125,200 - - 1,125,200 VICTORIA AVENUE EXTENSION -WF1158553 228,375 228,375 - - BARRON ROAD WIDENING PHASE II -WF1332871 50,000 50,000 - - BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS 166 WATER SERVICE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 PROJECT EXPENDITURES ACTUAL ESTIMATE PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED THROUGH FY09 FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 6,812,804$ 2,658,750$ 74,998$ 29,762$ 20,835$ 40,785$ 24,550$ 34,950$ -$ -$ 6,100,000$ 7,275,000$ 900,000$ 5,750,000$ 3,900,000$ 2,475,000$ 12,413 10,000 10,000 10,000 5,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 4,000,000 5,750,000 1,950,000 775,000 1,200,000 1,550,000 1,375,000 1,525,000 (92,484) - 48,000 1,039,369 - - - - 3,919,929$ 5,760,000$ 8,108,000$ 9,099,369$ 2,105,000$ 7,310,000$ 5,285,000$ 4,010,000$ 10,732,733$ 8,418,750$ 8,182,998$ 9,129,130$ 2,125,835$ 7,350,785$ 5,309,550$ 4,044,950$ 4,835,713 26,794 200,000 800,000 - - - - - - - - - - - 939,000 2,907,000 - - 2,612 14,100 - - - 245,688 1,612,600 - - - - - - - - - 900,000 - - - 418,000 1,315,400 - - - - - 98,355 290,000 3,116,645 48,000 - - - - - 100,715 137,500 - - - - - - - - - 625,000 2,557,000 - - - - - - 300,000 - - - - - - - - 80,000 - - - - - - - - 37,450 371,295 - - - - - - - - 45,000 515,000 - - - - - - - - - 272,000 - - - - - - 37,500 50,000 260,500 - - - - - 150,000 25,000 30,000 - - - - - - - 50,000 - - - - - - - - 240,000 260,000 - - - - 966,632 6,546,037 261,304 5,802,345$ 6,774,513$ 1,470,354$ 5,728,440$ 4,775,400$ 532,500$ 1,184,688$ 4,519,600$ 900,000$ - - 70,270 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 - 29,730 - - - - - - 293,942 232,460 2,835,598 - - - - - - 3,320,194 102,921 560,000 557,000 - - - - - 1,201,863 - 211,668 - - - - - - 9,557 15,348 16,500 108,500 740,095 - - - - - - - 137,000 988,200 - - - - 6,270 2,130 219,975 - - - - - - - - 50,000 - - - - - - PROJECT EXPENDITURES 167 WATER SERVICE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 FY12 REVISED APPROVED PROJECT WORK REQUEST APPROVED APPROPRIATIONS FY10 - 11 FY11 - 12 NUMBER NUMBER BUDGET THROUGH FY10 APPROPRIATIONS APPROPRIATIONS BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS SH 40 WATER LINE - GRAHAM TO BARRON -TBD 2,535,000 25,000 - - SH 40 WATER LINE - Sonoma Subdivision to Victoria -TBD 643,000 - - - PATRICIA STREET WATER LINE -WF1246445 115,000 150,000 - - FM2818/JONES BUTLER WATER LINE CONFLICT -WF1272122 225,000 225,000 - - VILLA MARIA/FM 2818 WATER LINE CONFLUCT -WF1344704 251,429 251,429 - - AREA 2 WATER LINE EXTENSION TBD 1,112,568 - - - CCWWTP LAB & SCADA BUILDING - WATER LINE WF1352985 127,000 106,923 20,077 - DONATED WATER NA - - CLOSED PROJECTS - SUBTOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS: TAUBER & STASNEY -WF0625888 296,403 415,044 - - SOUTH KNOLL/THE GLADE -WF1044480 2,265,192 2,246,738 - 18,454 SOUTHWOOD 5-7 -WF1105425 1,966,311 2,197,663 - - EASTGATE REHAB -TBD 2,642,029 - - - COLLEGE HEIGHTS REHAB -TBD 2,423,844 - - - McCULLOCH UTILITY REHAB -TBD 2,789,947 - - - COONER UTILITY REHAB -WF1440709 446,000 - - 65,000 PLANTATION OAKS WATER LINE -WF1433732 240,318 - - 240,318 CLOSED PROJECTS SUBTOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS CONTINGENCY -TBD 129,923 150,000 METER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM -WF1128579 150,000 140,000 10,000 150,000 CAPITAL PROJECTS SUBTOTAL 53,781,859 3,882,694$ 8,456,117$ GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE 70,269 69,294 DEBT ISSUANCE COST 15,000 50,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,967,963$ 8,575,411$ MEASUREMENT FOCUS ADJUSTMENT ENDING FUND BALANCE:6,944,235$ (392,413)$ 168 WATER SERVICE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 PROJECT EXPENDITURES ACTUAL ESTIMATE PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED THROUGH FY09 FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 PROJECT EXPENDITURES - - - - 148,500 470,700 1,915,800 - - - - - - 100,000 100,000 443,000 - - - 43 114,957 - - - - - - - - 225,000 - - - - - - - - 251,429 - - - - - - - - - - - 221,850 890,718 - - - - 32,000 95,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 188,310 361,246 40,334 5,020,136$ 714,148$ 4,657,461$ 997,500$ 2,076,795$ 892,550$ 3,349,518$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 21,403 - 275,000 - - - - - - 100,525 79,167 21,250 634,150 1,430,100 - - - - 124,088 74,488 1,689,201 78,534 - - - - - - - - - - 275,000 2,367,029 - - - - - - - - - 250,000 2,173,844 - - - - - - - - 449,799 - - - 55,000 391,000 - - - - - - - 240,318 - - - - - 179,047 246,016$ 332,702$ 1,985,451$ 1,008,002$ 1,821,100$ 275,000$ 2,367,029$ 250,000$ 2,623,643$ - - - 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 - 214,313 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 11,068,497$ 8,035,677$ 8,263,266$ 8,033,942$ 8,973,295$ 2,000,050$ 7,201,235$ 5,169,600$ 3,923,643$ 83,757 80,487 69,294 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 2,280 - 50,000 60,000 10,000 50,000 30,000 15,000 8,121,714$ 8,343,753$ 8,153,236$ 9,108,295$ 2,085,050$ 7,326,235$ 5,274,600$ 4,013,643$ 47,731$ 2,658,750$ 74,998$ 29,762$ 20,835$ 40,785$ 24,550$ 34,950$ 31,307$ 169 WASTEWATER SERVICE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 FY12 REVISED APPROVED PROJECT WORK REQUEST APPROVED APPROPRIATIONS FY10-11 FY11-12 NUMBER NUMBER BUDGET THROUGH FY10 APPROPRIATIONS APPROPRIATIONS BEGINNING FUND BALANCE:512,852$ 512,852$ ADDITIONAL RESOURCES: UTILITY REVENUE BONDS/CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION 6,425,000$ 7,580,000$ INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 7,900 10,000 TRANSFERS FROM OPERATIONS 825,000 1,120,000 INTERGOVERNMENTAL - - OTHER 500,000 72,000 SUBTOTAL ADDITIONAL RESOURCES 7,757,900$ 8,782,000$ TOTAL RESOURCES AVAILABLE 8,270,752$ 9,294,852$ COLLECTION PROJECTS COLLECTION PLANT - SCWOC OVERSIZE PARTICIPATION - TBD 100,000 - 100,000 100,000 RAYMOND STOTZER WEST - WF1111168 45,952 631,130 - - EAST SIDE FM 158 SEWER LINE WF1382208 1,538,000 - - 735,000 NANTUCKET GRAVITY SEWER WF1094676 432,938 516,000 15,000 - LICK CREEK PARALLEL TRUNK LINE - PHASE I WF0912284 2,825,000 395,496 - - VICTORIA AVENUE EXTENSION - WF1158560 47,000 47,000 - - SCOTT AND WHITE SEWER LINE/LIFT STATION WF1338390 1,207,758 - 1,500,000 - BEE CREEK PARALLEL TRUNKLINE WF1369909 14,703,625 - 2,000,000 106,997 FM 2154 SEWER SERVICE WF1369908 3,332,836 - 500,000 - SUBTOTAL REHABILITATION PROJECTS EMERALD PKWY / BENT OAK -WF0626151 297,064 297,064 - - TAUBER & STASNEY REHAB -WF0625893 450,626 594,109 - - SOUTH KNOLL / THE GLADE -WF1044485 3,005,683 2,052,223 - 953,460 SOUTHWOOD 5-7 -WF1105424 2,983,734 2,983,734 - - EASTGATE REHAB -TBD 2,805,830 - - - COLLEGE HEIGHTS REHAB -TBD 1,302,844 - - - COONER UTILITY REHAB -WF1440708 657,000 - - 92,000 McCULLOCH UTILITY REHAB TBD 2,381,515 - - - NORTHEAST TRUNK LINE REHAB WF1440716 309,029 - - 309,029 CLOSED PROJECTS SUBTOTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS 170 WASTEWATER SERVICE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 PROJECT EXPENDITURES ACTUAL ESTIMATE PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED THROUGH FY09 FY09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 929,734$ 1,184,795$ 512,852$ 40,730$ 31,311$ 38,332$ 5,869$ 27,122$ 300,468$ 3,130,000$ 7,580,000$ 13,175,000$ 3,860,000$ 5,300,000$ 3,145,000$ 5,575,000$ 3,342 7,900 10,000 15,000 10,000 10,000 5,000 7,500 2,700,000 2,625,000 1,120,000 775,000 940,000 1,610,000 1,175,000 1,240,000 - - - - - - - - - 500,000 72,000 250,000 - - - - 3,003,810$ 6,262,900$ 8,782,000$ 14,215,000$ 4,810,000$ 6,920,000$ 4,325,000$ 6,822,500$ 3,933,544$ 7,447,695$ 9,294,852$ 14,255,730$ 4,841,311$ 6,958,332$ 4,330,869$ 6,849,622$ - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 18,241 22,569 5,142 - - - - - - - - - 325,000 831,000 382,000 - - - 33,938 239,825 159,175 - - - - - - 10,422 - - - - - - 1,683,747 1,130,831 2,035 - - 44,965 - - - - - - - 273,000 934,758 - - - - - - - 100,000 1,606,997 9,671,149 3,325,479 - - 75,000 225,000 370,000 210,000 2,452,836 - - 64,636$ 262,394$ 712,317$ 3,236,720$ 10,972,149$ 4,017,479$ 2,552,836$ 1,783,747$ 1,230,831$ 6,006 39 291,019 - - - - - - 85,626 - 365,000 - - - - - - 66,995 52,796 110,000 847,188 1,928,704 - - - - 110,940 113,303 2,623,160 136,331 - - - - - - - - - 275,000 2,530,830 - - - - - - - - - 250,000 1,052,844 - - - 82,000 575,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - 449,799 - - - 309,029 224,277 884,994 2,281 493,844$ 1,051,132$ 3,391,460$ 1,374,548$ 2,503,704$ 275,000$ 2,530,830$ 250,000$ 1,502,643$ PROJECT EXPENDITURES 171 WASTEWATER SERVICE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 FY12 REVISED APPROVED PROJECT WORK REQUEST APPROVED APPROPRIATIONS FY10-11 FY11-12 NUMBER NUMBER BUDGET THROUGH FY10 APPROPRIATIONS APPROPRIATIONS BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS TREATMENT & DISPOSAL PROJECTS TREATMENT & DISPOSAL/PUMPING PLANT - SPWOC CARTERS CREEK HEADWORKS IMP WF1223116 1,508,550 500,000 - 1,008,550 LICK CREEK CLARIFIER CATWALKS WF1042497 413,470 387,500 - 25,970 SLUDGE TREATMENT & DISPOSAL/PUMPING PLANT - SSWOC LICK CREEK CENTRIFUGE IMPROVEMENTS WF1142617 405,571 400,000 85,575 - LICK CREEK SLUDGE HOLDING TANK IMP WF1142618 452,739 500,000 - - CARTERS CREEK ATAD IMPROVEMENTS WF1104547 238,593 914,000 - - LICK CREEK RETURN ACTIVATED SLUDGE MODIFICATIONS WF1142623 433,144 250,000 - 183,144 CC CENTRIFUGE IMPROVEMENTS TBD 2,182,000 - - - LICK CREEK SLUDGE BLOWER REPLACEMENT WF1440712 200,000 - - 200,000 CC TREATMENT STRUCTURE COATINGS REPLACEMENT TBD 366,000 - - - LICK CREEK DIGESTION FACILITY TBD 4,097,000 - - - LICK CREEK CAPACITY EXPANSION TBD 7,127,000 - - - LICK CREEK CENTRIFUGE REPLACEMENT WF1433858 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 - CC DIGESTED SLUDGE AERATOR REPLACEMENT WF1441829 650,000 - - 650,000 LIFT STATION FORCE MAIN REHAB TBD 71,797 - - - CLOSED PROJECTS SEWER GENERAL PLANT - SGWOC SCADA REPLACEMENT -WF0742950 545,340 445,340 100,000 - CARTERS CREEK LAB AND SCADA BUILDING WF1129844 1,267,000 838,087 327,000 - LICK CREEK PROCESS CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS WF1142624 278,435 203,000 - 75,435 SCADA - NEW LIFT STATIONS WF1359125 275,000 80,000 80,000 115,000 REMOTE PLANT SECURITY -WF1219655 300,000 300,000 - - CC FIBER RING WF1440366 450,000 120,000 - - CC ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMENTS -TBD 1,323,000 - - - UTILITY SERVICE CENTER RENOVATIONS WF1441517 348,000 - 37,500 - AGGIE ACRES FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT -WF1440367 111,172 - - 111,172 CLOSED PROJECTS -- - SUBTOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS CONTINGENCY TBD - 33,087 150,000 CAPITAL PROJECTS SUBTOTAL 62,470,245 5,778,162$ 4,815,757$ GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE 70,299 69,294 DEBT ISSUANCE COST 35,000 40,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5,883,461$ 4,925,051$ MEASUREMENT FOCUS ADJUSTMENT ENDING FUND BALANCE:2,387,291$ 4,369,801$ 172 WASTEWATER SERVICE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 PROJECT EXPENDITURES ACTUAL ESTIMATE PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED THROUGH FY09 FY09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 PROJECT EXPENDITURES - 52,402 227,223 924,509 304,416 - - - - 8,374 17,877 220,219 167,000 - - - - - 4,575 50,469 195,527 155,000 - - - - - 4,893 33,776 257,970 156,100 - - - - - 10,641 88,675 139,277 - - - - - - 676 31,080 232,950 168,438 - - - - - - - - - - - 475,000 1,068,000 639,000 - - - 200,000 - - - - - - - - - - - 366,000 - - - - - - - - - - 2,635,000 - - - - - - - - 540,000 - - 150,000 850,000 - - - 650,000 - - - - - - 71,797 77,152 721,248 47,056 149,038 48,626 312,908 34,768 - - - - - 19,087 110,857 544,248 592,808 - - - - - 2,811 24,553 152,065 99,006 - - - - - - - 63,591 117,259 94,150 - - - - - 137,693 162,307 - - - - - - - - - 120,000 - - 330,000 - - - - - - - 696,000 627,000 - - - - 37,500 50,000 260,500 - - - - - - 111,172 - - - - - 85,957 400,906 45,426 363,204$ 1,718,162$ 2,750,767$ 4,383,560$ 448,566$ 260,500$ 1,608,797$ 2,025,000$ 3,814,000$ - 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 921,684$ 3,031,688$ 6,854,544$ 9,144,828$ 14,074,419$ 4,702,979$ 6,842,463$ 4,208,747$ 6,697,474$ 77,890 70,299 69,294 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 103 10,000 40,000 80,000 30,000 40,000 25,000 40,000 3,109,681$ 6,934,843$ 9,254,122$ 14,224,419$ 4,802,979$ 6,952,463$ 4,303,747$ 6,807,474$ 360,931$ 1,184,795$ 512,852$ 40,730$ 31,311$ 38,332$ 5,869$ 27,122$ 42,148$ 173 Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 Comments Water Projects Well #9 - - - - - 92,800 Personnel, supplies, maintenance and utility costs Well #9 Collection Line - - - - - 1,600 Line Maintenance Wellfield Collection System Loop - - - - - - Maintenance - estimated to begin in FY18 Dowling Road 10 MG Storage Tank - - - - - - TBD - O&M estimated to begin FY17 SPPS Chemical System Replacement - - 41,200 42,436 43,709 45,020 Supplies and maintenance High Service Water Pump Improvements - - 67,000 69,010 71,080 73,213 Maintenance, utility costs and instrument calibration Cooling Tower Expansion - - 61,000 62,830 64,715 66,656 Supplies and utility costs Distribution SCADA - - - 5,000 5,150 5,305 Supply costs Reclaimed Water - Irrigation Phase I 46,000 47,380 48,801 50,265 51,773 53,327 Supplies, maintenance and utility costs Water Project Totals 46,000$ 47,380$ 218,001$ 229,541$ 236,428$ 337,921$ Wastewater Projects East Side FM 158 Sewer Service - - - 12,800 13,184 13,580 Supplies and maintenance costs FM 2154 Sewer Line - - - - 200 206 Utility costs Emerald Parkway/Bent Oak 3,125 3,219 3,315 3,415 3,517 3,623 Line Maintenance Carters Creek Centrifuge Improvements - - - - 10,500 10,815 Supplies and maintenance Lick Creek Digestion Facility - - - - - 60,750 Personnel, maintenance and utility costs Wastewater Project Totals 3,125$ 3,219$ 3,315$ 16,215$ 27,401$ 88,973$ Total Estimated O&M Costs 49,125$ 50,599$ 221,317$ 245,756$ 263,829$ 426,894$ *The Operations and Maintenance costs reflected above are estimates based on anticipated costs associated with each project. In some situations, the O&M cost of a project is minimal and can be absorbed by the City department that is benefiting the most from the project. In other situations, the O&M cost is more significant and funding for these additional expenses is addressed through the Service Level Adjustment (SLA) process. As the projects become better defined, the O&M estimates may be revised. Enterprise Funds Capital Improvement Projects Estimated Operations and Maintenance Costs* 174 Hotel Tax Fund The primary funding source for the Hotel Tax Fund is the Hotel tax, a consumption type tax authorized under state statute. This tax allows the City to collect up to its current tax rate of 7% on rental income of hotels and motels within the city limits. Funds derived from the Hotel Tax Fund can only be spent if the following two-part test is met: I. Every expenditure must directly enhance and promote tourism and the convention and hotel industry. II. Every expenditure must clearly fit into one of eight statutorily provided categories for expenditure of local hotel occupancy tax revenues. 1. Funding the establishment, improvement, or maintenance of a convention or visitor information center. 2. Paying for the administrative costs for facilitating convention registration. 3. Paying for tourism related advertising, and promotion of the city or its vicinity. 4. Funding programs that enhance the arts. 5. Funding historical restoration or preservation projects. 6. Sporting events where the majority of participants are tourists in cities located in a county with a population of 290,000 or less. 7. Enhancing and upgrading existing sport facilities or fields for certain municipalities 8. Funding transportation systems for tourists This fund is prepared on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Under this basis, revenues are recognized when they become measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period . Expenditures are recognized when the related fund liability is incurred with the exception of several items. The full listing of these exceptions can be found in the Financial Policies on page F-1. Hotel Tax revenue is projected to increase 1% from the FY11 year-end estimate to $3,372,680. Investment earnings are in line with the FY11 revised budget. Revenues are forecasted to be relatively flat due to the recent downturn in the economy. Total approved expenditures and transfers out of the Hotel Tax Fund are $2,123,142. This is a 3.51% decrease from the FY11 revised budget due to the the removal of $89,000 in budgeted expenditures for the Arts Council of Brazos Valley that are being shifted to the General Fund in FY12 . In FY09, the city purchased 7 acres of land on University Dr. for the anticipated future construction of a Convention Center. A transfer of $224,444 to the Debt Service Fund for the Convention Center land purchase is scheduled to be made from the Hotel Tax Fund in FY12. $326,698 in approved expenditures related to Parks and Recreation Programs & Events are included in the FY12 budget. Programs in the budget include items such as the Starlight Music Series, National & Regional Athletic Tournaments, and other events that are eligible for Hotel Tax funds. $19,000 in SLA funding is included for hosting the annual TPPC Annual Aquatic Conference and $200,000 is included for soliciting and hosting of sports tournaments in College Station. The Hotel Tax Fund also includes $1,303,000 in approved Outside Agency funding expenditures. Outside Agencies receiving funding from the Hotel Tax Fund include the Bryan/College Station Convention & Visitors Bureau, the Arts Council of Brazos Valley, the George Bush Presidenial Library Foundation, the Bryan-College Station Chamber of Commerce, the Northgate District Association, and the Brazos Valley Veterans Memorial. SLA Funding in the amount of $50,000 is included for Outside Agency expenditures. Funding for the George Bush Library will increase by $25,000 to $50,000 for increased marketing in the Houston metro area as well as the American Airlines in-flight magazine. Additionally, $3,000 is included for Northgate advertising to attract visitors to the district during the annual fire school at the TEEX Brayton Fire Training Field. Finally, $25,000 in SLA funding is approved for funding design and construction of additional war memorials along the Lynn Stuart Pathway at Veterans Park. For FY12, $5,500,000 of the fund balance has been reserved for capital projects that meet the requirements for use of Hotel Tax Funds. 175 City of College Station Hotel Tax Fund Fund Summary 11/4/11 2:15 PM FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 % Change in FY10 Revised Year-End Approved Approved Budget from Actual Budget Estimate Base Budget Budget FY11 to FY12 Beginning Fund Balance 1,939,266$ 3,241,580$ 3,241,580$ 4,832,515$ 4,832,515$ REVENUES Taxes 3,416,713$ 3,394,000$ 3,339,287$ 3,372,680$ 3,372,680$ -0.63% Investment Earnings 24,973 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 0.00% Other - - 249,243 - - N/A Total Revenues 3,441,686$ 3,422,000$ 3,616,530$ 3,400,680$ 3,400,680$ -0.62% Total Funds Available 5,380,952$ 6,663,580$ 6,858,110$ 8,233,195$ 8,233,195$ 23.56% EXPENDITURES & TRANSFERS City Operations: Parks Programs & Events 422,092$ 347,816$ 314,576$ 326,698$ 326,698$ -6.07% Sports Tournament Revolving Funds - 200,000 113,000 200,000 200,000 0.00% Miscellaneous Programs & Events 9,398 10,000 4,500 - 19,000 90.00% Convention Center Land Debt Service 223,615 222,519 222,519 224,444 224,444 0.86% Credit Card Fees 18,773 24,000 25,000 - - -100.00% Total City Operations Expenditures 673,878$ 804,335$ 679,595$ 751,142$ 770,142$ -4.25% Outside Agency Funding Expenditures: B/CS Convention & Visitors Bureau 1,107,000$ 1,057,000$ 1,057,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ -5.39% Arts Council of Brazos Valley 286,635 289,000 289,000 200,000 200,000 -30.80% George Bush Presidential Library Foundation 50,000 - - 25,000 50,000 N/A Veterans Memorial 10,000 - - - 25,000 N/A Northgate Advertising - - - 3,000 3,000 N/A B/CS Chamber of Commerce - - - 25,000 25,000 N/A Total Outside Agency Funding Expenditures 1,453,635$ 1,346,000$ 1,346,000$ 1,253,000$ 1,303,000$ -3.19% Contingency -$ 50,000$ -$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 0.00% Total Operating Expenses & Transfers 2,127,513$ 2,200,335$ 2,025,595$ 2,054,142$ 2,123,142$ -3.51% Measurement Focus Adjustment (11,859) Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 1,314,173$ 1,221,665$ 1,590,935$ 1,346,538$ 1,277,538$ Reserve for Capital Projects -$ -$ -$ 5,500,000$ 5,500,000$ Unreserved Fund Balance 3,241,580 4,463,245 4,832,515 679,053 610,053 Ending Fund Balance 3,241,580$ 4,463,245$ 4,832,515$ 6,179,053$ 6,110,053$ Taxes 99.2% Investment Earnings 0.8% Hotel Tax Fund -Sources Parks Programs & Events 15.4% Sports Tournament Revolving Funds 9.4% Miscellaneous Programs & Events 0.9% Convention Center Land Debt Service 10.6% Outside Agencies 61.4% Contingency 2.4% Hotel Tax Fund -Uses 176 Community Development Fund  The Community Development Fund is used to account for grants received by the City for use in revitalizing low-income areas and addressing the needs of low and moderate income citizens. The City has submitted an action plan to HUD for FY12 to receive the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and the Home Grant. The CDBG program is a federal entitlement program that provides basic funding for general programs and administration. The grant allows administrators flexibility in the use of funds for a wide variety of eligible activities. The Home Grant is a yearly entitlement grant that can only be used for housing programs that assist Low/Moderate Income (LMI) individuals. Community Development Block Grant funds are allocated to projects including housing assistance and rehabilitation, demolition projects and acquisitions. Other eligible expenditures include interim assistance, public service agency funding, and Code Enforcement activities. The City currently uses Home Grant funds for owner-occupied rehabilitation assistance and down payment assistance. Funds are also approved for Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDO) activities, new construction, and Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA). Community Development funds are also used for capital projects in areas that qualify for these funds. Both CDBG and HOME allocations are based on a formula that includes criteria such as the age and condition of a community’s housing stock, incidents of overcrowding, and the demographic characteristics of the city. This fund is prepared on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Under this basis revenues are recognized when they become measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. Expenditures are recognized when the related fund liability is incurred with the exception of several items. The full listing of these exceptions can be found in the Financial Policies on page F-1. For FY12, the City anticipates receiving $5,390,272 in total authorizations from the federal government. This amount is comprised of new and unspent authorizations from the prior fiscal year. The City anticipates receiving $2,303,828 in CDBG funds and an additional $377,500 in recaptured funds. Approved FY12 HOME authorizations total $2,708,944. Total appropriations for FY12 are $5,012,772. Of this total, $2,303,828 is allocated for CDBG elegible expenditures and $2,708,944 is allocated for HOME grant expenditures. One reduction SLA of $5,000 is included in the FY12 Approved Budget that will reduce the amount of funding to Project Unity from $10,000 to $5,000. Approved CDBG appropriations include Public Facility projects that are intended to expand, improve and/or add public facilities and infrastructure when and where needed for designated low to moderate income areas of the city. Improvements include streets, parks, neighborhood centers, community centers, and sidewalk projects. Approved FY12 expenditures for ongoing Public Facility projects include the College Main Rehab project ($348,890), which will rehabilitate approximately 230 feet of existing roadway, sidewalks, and drainage facilities along College Main between the College Station & Bryan city limits and Spruce Street. Georgie K. Fitch Park Improvements ($103,629) include the addition of a lighted concrete jogging loop and associated landscaping in Georgie K. Fitch Park. FY12 appropriations include $1,345,634 for new Public Facility Projects. The Cooner Street Rehab and Reconstruction project ($1,195,634) includes the rehabilitation of water lines, wastewater lines, and pavement along Cooner street. Additional funds for this project will come from the Streets Capital Improvements Fund, Water Capital Improvments Fund, and Wastewater Capital Improvement Fund. FM 2154 Sidewalk Improvements ($75,000) include the design of a sidewalk along one side of FM 2154 from Luther Street to Southwest Parkway. University Drive Sidewalk Improvements ($75,000) include the design of a sidewalk on the south side of University Drive from Texas Avenue to Lions Park. Construction of these sidewalk projects is not currently funded. Approved FY12 Public Facility appropriations total $1,798,153. 177 City of College Station Community Development Fund Fund Summary FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 % Change in FY10 Revised Year-End Approved Approved Budget from Actual Budget Estimate Base Budget Budget FY11 to FY12 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 1,589,299$ 2,204,560$ 2,204,560$ 2,477,060$ 2,477,060$ REVENUES Grants Community Development Block Grant 2,834,136$ 1,681,406$ 577,695$ 2,303,828 2,303,828$ 37.02% Home Grant 804,300 1,789,054 442,581 2,708,944 2,708,944 51.42% Other Revenue 9,850 - - - - N/A Recaptured Funds 21,330 650,000 272,500 377,500 377,500 -41.92% Total Revenues 3,669,616$ 4,120,460$ 1,292,776$ 5,390,272$ 5,390,272$ 30.82% TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE 5,258,915$ 6,325,020$ 3,497,336$ 7,867,332$ 7,867,332$ 24.38% EXPENDITURES AND TRANSFERS Community Development Block Grant Housing Assistance/Rehab 9,156$ 15,000$ -$ 15,000$ 15,000$ 0.00% Clearance/Demolition - 10,000 - 10,000 10,000 0.00% Acquisitions 2,388,039 350,410 - - - -100.00% Interim Assistance - 5,000 - 5,000 5,000 0.00% Housing Services - - 12,761 30,000 30,000 N/A Public Service Agency Funding 138,663 164,094 205,844 154,395 154,395 -5.91% Code Enforcement - Planning & Dev.83,298 88,684 75,696 85,416 85,416 -3.68% Code Enforcement - Econ. & Comm. Dev.- 36,899 - - - -100.00% Administrative Fees 160,081 196,651 169,413 210,864 205,864 4.68% Public Facilities Projects - 253,168 - - -100.00% College Main Rehab - 398,000 50,777 348,890 348,890 -12.34% George K Fitch Park Improvements - 103,500 1,538 103,629 103,629 0.12% W.A. Tarrow Park Improvements - 60,000 61,666 - - -100.00% Cooner Street Rehab - - - 1,195,634 1,195,634 N/A Wellborn Road Sidewalks - - - 75,000 75,000 N/A University Drive Sidewalks - - - 75,000 75,000 N/A Total CDBG Expenditures 2,779,237$ 1,681,406$ 577,695$ 2,308,828$ 2,303,828$ 37.02% Home Grant Housing Assistance/Rehab -$ 107,159$ -$ 107,159$ 107,159$ 0.00% Homebuyer’s Assistance 67,233 203,818 112,245 200,000 200,000 -1.87% CHDO 147,526 555,577 185,782 454,802 454,802 -18.14% New Construction 420 131 1 291 986 41 067 1 726 720 1 726 720 33 65%New Construction 420,131 1,291,986 41,067 1,726,720 1,726,720 33.65% Tenant Based Rental Assistance 9,649 91,566 9,150 88,016 88,016 -3.88% CHDO Operating Expenses 7,899 87,585 35,615 69,071 69,071 -21.14% Administrative Fees 71,648 71,363 58,722 63,176 63,176 -11.47% Housing Services - 30,000 - - - -100.00% Total Home Expenditures 724,086$ 2,439,054$ 442,581$ 2,708,944$ 2,708,944$ 11.07% Total Operating Expenses & Transfers 3,503,323$ 4,120,460$ 1,020,276$ 5,017,772$ 5,012,772$ 21.66% Expenditures Under (Over) Revenues 166,293$ -$ 272,500$ 372,500$ 377,500$ Measurement Focus Adjustment 448,968 - - - - ENDING FUND BALANCE 2,204,560$ 2,204,560$ 2,477,060$ 2,849,560$ 2,854,560$ Community  Development  Block Grant 46% Home Grant 54% Community Development Fund ‐Sources Total CDBG  Expenditures 46% Total Home  Expenditures 54% Community Development Fund ‐Uses 178 City of College Station Community Development Fund Operations & Maintenance Summary EXPENDITURE BY DIVISION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Community Development 271,797$ 319,740$ 319,740$ 293,263$ 288,263$ -9.84% TOTAL 271,797$ 319,740$ 319,740$ 293,263$ 288,263$ -9.84% EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Salaries & Benefits 235,313$ 278,175$ 278,175$ 251,375 251,375$ -9.63% Supplies 3,926 4,544 4,544 4,792 4,792 5.46% Maintenance - - - - - N/A Purchased Services 32,558 37,021 37,021 37,096 32,096 -13.30% Capital Outlay - - - - - N/A TOTAL 271,797$ 319,740$ 319,740$ 293,263$ 288,263$ -9.84% PERSONNEL Revised Approved Approved % Change in Actual Actual Budget Base Budget Budget Budget from FY09* FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Community Development 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 0.00% TOTAL 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 0.00% *Community Development personnel was accounted for in the General Fund until FY10 Service Level Adjustments One-Time Recurring Total Community Development Reduction in Project Unity Funding -$ (5,000)$ (5,000)$ Community Development SLA TOTAL -$ (5,000)$ (5,000)$ 179 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Description & Budget Explanation: The Community Development Division is responsible for providing affordable housing and public assistance to benefit low/moderate Income individuals through the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnership grants from the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Programs include housing rehabilitation, down payment assistance, public facility improvements, public service agency assistance, and general administrative oversight. Community Development was moved to the Community Development Fund in FY 08. Line of Business: Facilitate Strong and Effective Partnerships with Public Service Agencies Service Levels:1) Funding and oversight of health and human service programs 2) Provide technical assistance 3) Attend and participate in stakeholder meetings 4) Assess program efficacy Performance Measures FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Efficiency -Number of desk / on-site monitorings*24 30 41 34 Output - Number of programs provided technical assistance **22 10 16 10 - Number of social service programs funded **10 7 8 5 - Total clients assisted **572 5,000 4,775 1,265 * Includes technical assistance provided to both agencies funded by the City and those seeking funding and receiving assistance in program assessment and development ** As level or reduced CDBG funding is expected, the number of public service agency programs funded is likely to remain the same. Ultimately, the number of programs funded and monitored and number of clients served is recommended by the JRFRC and approved by City Council based on local need. Client numbers reported following the 1st quarter. Line of Business: Provide Affordable Housing Service Levels:1) Promote new affordable housing 2) Renovate or replace existing sub-standard housing 3) Demolish dilapidated housing 4) Facilitate the provision of Tenant-Based Rental Assistance Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Efficiency - Percentage of available HOME funds disbursed 53% 80% 18% 80% - Percentage of available CDBG funds disbursed NA 70% 53% 75% Output - Home buyers assisted / 2 12 5 12 -Homeownership Counseling Sessions 8 30 20 55 - TBRA Applications processed 20 65 28 60 - Affordable units replaced, renovated, or constructed *4536 - Dilapidated structures demolished 0111 * Affordable units include owner-occupied repaired and replaced units, as well as newly constructed affordable units built by: the City, CHDO, Habitat for Humanity and other affordable housing developers, to include Housing Tax Credit prospects. 180 Program Name: Development of Public Facilities and Infrastructure Service Levels:1) Identify and assess public facility projects 2) Prioritize projects 3) Perform environmental reviews and other clearance approvals 4) Monitor bid process and provide project oversight Performance Measures:FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Output - Number of projects identified and funded 0333 - Number of citizen input opportunities facilitated *0 2 10 2 - Number of compliance procedures initiated / completed **0 16 18 28 - Number of infrastructure projects completed ***0203 No Public Facility activities funded with CDBG in FY 2010. * Number of public hearings, neighborhood meetings and website and published notices are examples of citizen input opportunities ** Number of environmental reviews, labor relations reviews and bidding processes completed . *** Number of projects may include those currently approved and underway from previous budget years Program Name: Neighborhood Reinvestment and Development Service Levels:1) Identify and provide funding for code enforcement and reinvestment efforts 2) Engage and educate citizens and neighborhood groups 3) Encourage sustainable development / redevelopment 4) Facilitate inter-departmental cooperation Performance Measures: FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Output - Number of code enforcement cases processed 1,977 4,000 4,000 5,000 - Technical Assistance Provided 2 12 8 12 - Contact with neighborhood groups * 3222 - Contact with other City departments and stakeholders ** 10 2 10 2 * Contact include public hearing in low-income neighborhoods, and meetings with neighborhood representative/organizations via telephone, email, regular mail and/or personal meetings ** Stakeholders include involved City departments, neighborhood representatives and developers Program Name: Grant Planning, Implementation and Administration Service Levels:1) Perform budget, payroll and payment reconciliation and processing 2) Provide effective interdepartmental and external communication 3) Perform and publish mandatory reviews, reports and publications Performance Measures:FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness - Resources Secured $161,814 $1,711,404 $1,032,392 $2,037,688 CDBG / HOME $371,779 $2,409,053 $442,581 $2,708,974 Efficiency - Major plans and reports completed and submitted on time * 8 10 10 37 - Percentage of grant resources allocated for administration ** 5.0% 10.0% 6.0% 5.00% Output -Pre-bid / pre-construction meetings *** 3467 - Project-based stakeholders engaged 5 3 5 10 * Includes Annual Action Plan and Budget, CAPER, Labor Relations Reports and Environmental Reviews ** Administrative expenses are projected to drop slightly due to increased staffing efficiencies and anticipated reductions in future grant allocations *** Includes pre-bid and pre-construction meetings for both public facility projects, housing and demolitions projects 181 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 % Change in FY10 Revised Year-End Approved Approved Budget from Actual Budget Estimate Base Budget Budget FY11 to FY12 REVENUES Sports Programs -$ 300,000$ 293,477$ 387,288$ 358,663$ 19.55% Aquatics - 306,550 320,760 474,169 467,669 52.56% Concessions - 114,000 123,500 - - (100.00%) Instruction - 234,759 249,142 96,654 96,654 (58.83%) SW Center, Lincoln Center - 41,755 62,694 51,780 51,780 24.01% Conference Center - 156,247 168,411 222,850 222,850 42.63% Investment Earnings - 400 400 400 400 0.00% Other - - - - - N/A Total Revenues -$ 1,153,711$ 1,218,384$ 1,233,141$ 1,198,016$ 3.84% EXPENDITURES Sports Programs -$ 1,336,185$ 1,412,057$ 1,457,969$ 1,365,850$ 2.22% Aquatics - 933,725 1,005,726 1,200,445 1,137,816 21.86% Concessions - 114,000 126,557 12,000 - (100.00%) Instruction - 463,598 427,911 244,156 244,156 (47.33%) SW Center, Lincoln Center - 738,985 734,901 704,846 704,846 (4.62%) Conference Center - 349,468 317,704 358,674 358,674 2.63% Total Expenditures -$ 3,935,961$ 4,024,856$ 3,978,090$ 3,811,342$ (3.17%) GENERAL FUND SUBSIDY -$ (2,782,250)$ (2,806,472)$ (2,744,949)$ (2,613,326)$ (6.07%) Increase/Decrease in Working Capital -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ N/A Beginning Working Capital -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ N/A Ending Working Capital -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ N/A City of College Station Recreation Fund Fund Summary Established in FY11, the Recreation Fund is designed to help the city identify costs and revenues associated with various recreational sports, concessions, Senior/Teen Centers, Lincoln Center, Conference Center, and various instruction programs. Ultimately the fund will help identify how much the General Fund is subsidizing these programs. For FY12, some programs have been categorized differently than they were in FY11, resulting in the year-over-year budget differences. These changes are reflected in the Program Budget Report on the next page. This fund is prepared on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Under this basis revenues are recognized when they become measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. Expenditures are recognized when the related fund liability is incurred with the exception of several items. The full listing of these exceptions can be found in the Financial Policies in the Appendix F. Sports Programs 30% Aquatics 39% Instruction 8% SW Center, Lincoln Center 4% Conference Center 19% Recreation Fund Sources Sports Programs 36% Aquatics 30% Instruction 6% SW Center, Lincoln Center 19% Conference Center 9% Recreation Fund Uses 182 PROGRAM REVENUE DIRECT COST INDIRECT COST FIELD COST G&A TOTAL COST % OF REV RECOVERY SUBSIDY Adult Softball 198,840$ 159,653$ 99,900$ 45,468$ 11,176$ 316,197$ 62.88% (117,357)$ Adult Volleyball 14,000 17,192 23,185 - 1,203 41,580 33.67% (27,580) Youth Basketball 51,600 62,635 16,383 - 4,384 83,402 61.87% (31,802) Youth Football 25,250 39,801 28,894 14,603 2,786 86,084 29.33% (60,834) Girls Softball 9,000 30,716 62,722 12,125 2,150 107,713 8.36% (98,713) Youth Volleyball 22,980 36,338 16,383 - 2,544 55,265 41.58% (32,285) Adult Kickball 4,853 4,934 33,611 5,389 345 44,279 10.96% (39,426) Challenger Sports 1,540 17,901 20,289 - 1,253 39,443 3.90% (37,903) Tennis 30,600 28,296 15,178 - 1,981 45,455 67.32% (14,855) No-Fee Programs - 19,110 324,234 201,750 1,338 546,432 0.00% (546,432) TOTAL SPORTS 358,663$ 416,576$ 640,779$ 279,335$ 29,160$ 1,365,850$ 26.26% (1,007,187)$ Xtra Ed 96,654$ 184,274$ 46,983$ - 12,899$ 244,156$ 39.59% (147,502)$ TOTAL INSTRUCT 96,654$ 184,274$ 46,983$ - 12,899$ 244,156$ 39.59% (147,502)$ SW Pool 91,800$ 220,589$ 13,788$ - 15,441$ 249,818$ 36.75% (158,018)$ Thomas Pool 30,600 153,881 11,378 - 10,772 176,031 17.38% (145,431) Adamson Lagoon 196,156 326,723 19,813 - 22,871 369,407 53.10% (173,251) CSISD Natatorium 10,000 35,512 8,968 - 2,486 46,966 21.29% (36,966) Splash Pads - 26,380 8,968 - 1,847 37,195 0.00% (37,195) Swim Lessons 112,200 145,550 19,813 - 10,188 175,551 63.91% (63,351) Water Fitness - 17,113 8,968 - 1,198 27,279 0.00% (27,279) Swim Team 22,644 24,030 10,173 - 1,682 35,885 63.10% (13,241) Stroke Clinic 4,269 10,015 8,968 - 701 19,684 21.69% (15,415) TOTAL AQUATICS 467,669$ 959,793$ 110,837$ - 67,186$ 1,137,816$ 41.10% (670,147)$ SW Center-Teen 10,000$ 176,706$ 23,265$ - 12,369$ 212,340$ 4.71% (202,340)$ SW Center-Senior 2,000 60,135 23,265 - 4,209 87,609 2.28% (85,609) Lincoln Center 39,780 345,806 34,885 - 24,206 404,897 9.82% (365,117) TOTAL CENTERS 51,780$ 582,647$ 81,415$ - 40,784$ 704,846$ 7.35% (653,066)$ Conference Center 222,850$ 300,430$ 37,214$ - 21,030$ 358,674$ 62.13% (135,824)$ TOTAL CONF CTR 222,850$ 300,430$ 37,214$ - 21,030$ 358,674$ 62.13% (135,824)$ TOTAL 1,197,616$ 2,443,720$ 917,228$ 279,335$ 171,059$ 3,811,342$ 31.42% (2,613,726)$ FY12 APPROVED BUDGET - RECREATION PROGRAMS CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 183 City of College Station Recreation Fund  Operations & Maintenance Summary EXPENDITURE BY DIVISION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Sports Programs - 1,336,185 1,412,057 1,457,969$ 1,365,850$ 2.22% Aquatics - 933,725 1,005,726 1,200,445 1,137,816 21.86% Concessions - 114,000 126,557 12,000 - -100.00% Instruction - 463,598 427,911 244,156 244,156 -47.33% SW Center, Lincoln Center - 738,985 734,901 704,846 704,846 -4.62% Conference Center - 349,468 317,704 358,674 358,674 2.63% TOTAL - 3,935,961 4,024,856 3,978,090$ 3,811,342$ -3.17% EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Salaries & Benefits - 1,781,226 1,757,301 1,746,216$ 1,608,796$ -9.68% Supplies - 281,668 299,662 289,219 281,201 -0.17% Maintenance - 60,679 124,231 60,745 60,745 0.11% Purchased Services - 1,812,388 1,843,662 1,881,910 1,860,600 2.66% Capital Outlay - - - - - N/A TOTAL - 3,935,961 4,024,856 3,978,090$ 3,811,342$ -3.17% PERSONNEL Revised Approved Approved % Change in Actual Actual Budget Base Budget Budget Budget from FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Sports Programs - - 2.00 2.00 1.00 N/A Aquatics - - 2.00 2.00 2.00 N/A Concessions - - 0.20 0.20 0.20 N/A Instruction - - 2.00 2.00 2.00 N/A SW Center, Lincoln Center - - 4.50 3.50 3.50 N/A Conference Center - - 3.00 3.00 3.00 N/A Temp/Seasonal - - 38.00 38.00 38.00 N/A TOTAL - - 51.70 50.70 49.70 N/A NOTE: The following programs were moved from Sports Programs to Aquatics for FY12: Swim Team, Stroke Clinic. The following programs were moved from Instruction to Aquatics for FY12: Swim Lessons, Water Fitness. The following programs were moved from Instruction to Sports Programs for FY12: Tennis Lessons. Service Level Adjustments One-Time Recurring Total Eliminate Concessions Cost Center -$ (12,000)$ (12,000)$ Discontinue Programming Elements at Natatorium - (62,629) (62,629) Discontinue/Reduce Recreation Programming - (92,119) (92,119) Recreation Fund SLA TOTAL -$ (166,748)$ (166,748)$ 184 RECREATION FUND Description & Budget Explanation: The Recreation Fund is designed to help the city identify costs and revenues associated with sports, concessions, Southwood Community Center, and instruction programs. Program Name: Sports Programs Service Level: Provide athletic programs to meet the needs and desires of citizens of all ages, interests and skill levels; host high quality athletic events that will attract out-of-town visitors to our community & increase the economic prosperity of the local community through athletic events that will generate tourist dollars, assist organizations with planning and conducting athletic events that also attract tourist and generate economic growth in our community. Performance Measures:FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness -Percent satisfied on customer survey:97%98%98%98% Adult Softball 94%98%98%98% Adult Flag Football 100%98%98%98% Girls Fast pitch Softball 99%98%98%98% Youth Basketball 98%98%98%98% Adult Kickball N/A 98%98%98% Youth Flag Football 100%98%98%98% Adult Volleyball In session 98%98%98% Youth Volleyball In session 98%98%98% Tennis N/A 98%98%98% Efficiency -No. of adult teams City Leagues 571 581 581 581 -No. of youth participants City Leagues 4,096 1,370 1,370 1,370 -No. of participants for sponsored tournaments 3,690 N/A 3,690 3,690 Output -General Fund Subsidy amount by program Adult Softball N/A $115,295 $124,037 $117,357 Adult Flag Football N/A $34,198 $36,353 Elim. Girls Fast pitch Softball N/A $106,328 $121,717 $98,713 Youth Basketball N/A $19,745 $14,137 $31,082 Adult Kickball N/A $45,336 $41,219 $39,426 Youth Flag Football N/A $46,333 $51,891 $60,834 Adult Volleyball N/A $26,361 $30,479 $27,580 Youth Volleyball N/A $20,227 $21,352 $32,285 Tennis N/A $23,359 $16,266 $14,855 Output -% of Revenue Recovery Per Program Adult Softball N/A 49.6%46.3%62.9% Adult Flag Football N/A 19.2%0.0%Elim. Girls Fast pitch Softball N/A 17.5%12.9%8.4% Youth Basketball N/A 27.7%79.0%61.9% Adult Kickball N/A 13.8%24.3%11.0% Youth Flag Football N/A 35.3%31.6%29.3% Adult Volleyball N/A 44.3%36.9%33.7% Youth Volleyball N/A 53.2%54.0%41.6% Tennis N/A 55.1%48.0%67.3% 185 Program Name: Instruction Service Level: To meet the needs and desires of the youth, adult and senior populations in our community through continuing education programs, instructional and leisure activities that encourage positive mental physical and social development of citizens. Performance Measures:FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness -Percentage of satisfied customers on survey.98%98%98%98% Efficiency -Total No. of Instructional Classes Offered 376 370 370 370 -Percent expenditure covered by 100%49%69%40% revenue in Xtra Ed. -Total No. of Xtra Ed. Classes Offered.356 340 340 340 Output -Revenues from Xtra Education Classes $89,000 $95,159 $113,797 $96,654 -Total no. of Instructional participants.3,112 3,000 3,000 3,000 -No. of Xtra Ed Catalogs distributed.100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 -Total no. of Xtra Ed Participants.2,775 2,500 2,500 2,500 Program Name: Aquatics Service Level: Provide the public with safe, clean, attractive, professional operation of three city owned pools and one school owned pool for a reasonable fee. Activities include open swim, adult lap swim, pool parties, rentals, as well as support of the swim instruction program, competitive swim program, and Texas Public Pool Council. Performance Measure:FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Aproved Estimate Approved Effectiveness -Percent satisfied on customer survey.98%98%98%98% -Meet standards on all International Pool & Waterpark life guard audits.Exceeds Standards Exceeds Standards Exceeds Standards Exceeds Standards Efficiency -Percentage of expenditures covered by revenues.40.0%32.8%31.9%41.1% -Average annual cost per participant $8.93 $6.27 $6.27 $6.27 Output -Revenue.$336,380 $306,550 $320,760 $467,669 -No. of customers.93,302 138,885 138,885 138,885 -National Pool & Waterpark audits.3 3 3 3 -Conduct a minimum of 4 hours/ month/ guard staff safety training .3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 -Guard staff licensed through Ellis & Assoc.1 1 1 1 -No. of rentals:378 265 265 265 Theme Parties 4 6 6 6 After Hours Parties 174 159 159 159 Catered Pizza Parties 17 48 48 48 Pavilion Parties 183 52 52 52 Number of seasonal employees supervised 80 89 89 89 NOTE: Bad weather has a huge effect on these outputs and should be considered during review of such. Southwood Hallaran has required some major renovations that were not part of the original budget. Problems with the Adamson slide complex have also resulted in our expenditure level being higher than last year. 186 Program Name: Southwood Community Center-Teen Service Level: Utilizing city-owned and operated teen center, park facilities and resources, as well as school and privately owned facilities and resources, to provide and make easily accessible programs and activities for College Station's youth population that will create positive mental, physical and social youth development. Performance Measures:FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness -Percentage satisfied on customer survey.NA 95%95%95% Efficiency -No. of Teen Center members.NA 250 250 250 -No. of participants served through leisure/rec. activities.NA 15,500 15,500 15,500 -No. of participants served through educational activities.NA 1,400 1,400 1,400 -Staff to youth ratio.NA 1 to 8 1 to 8 1 to 8 Output -No. of leisure/rec. activities provided.NA 300 300 300 -No. of educational programs provided.NA 30 30 30 -Revenue generated through fees to participants (youth and rentals).NA $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 -No. of memberships retained NA 0.00%0.00%0% -No. of participants.NA 17,000 17,000 17,000 -No. of memberships sold.NA 250 250 250 -No. of days Southwood Center open.NA 246 246 246 -No. of rentals for external adult groups NA 75 75 75 -No. of rentals for external youth groups / Individuals NA 75 75 75 -Number of seasonal employees supervised NA 20 20 20 Output -General Fund Subsidy amount by program Southwood Community Center NA 202,621 $190,577 $202,340 Output -% of Revenue Recovery Per Program NA 1.3%9.5%4.7% 187 Program Name: Southwood Community Center-Senior Service Level: To meet the needs and desires of the adult and senior populations in our community through continuing education programs, instructional and leisure activities that encourage positive mental, physical and social development of citizens. Performance Measures:FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness -Percentage of satisfied customers on survey.98%98%98%98% Efficiency -Total No. of Senior Citizen Programs Offered.130 70 70 70 -Total No. of Senior Special Events Offered.20 7 7 7 -Total No. of Senior Participants Served.11,092 5,000 5,000 5,000 * Reduced due to new way of counting programs Output -General Fund Subsidy amount by program Southwood Center NA $81,096 $107,181 $85,609 Output -% of Revenue Recovery Per Program NA 0.2%3.4%2.3% 188 City of College Station ARRA Fund Fund Summary FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 % Change in FY10 Revised Year-End Approved Approved Budget from Actual Budget Estimate Base Budget Budget FY11 to FY12 Beginning Fund Balance 149$ 1,229$ 1,229$ 12$ 12$ REVENUES Stimulus Grant 529,442$ 196,658$ 351,469$ 65,000$ 65,000$ -66.95% Byrne Justice Asst. Grant 50,644 41,491 17,415 - - -100.00% Investment Earnings 1,080 520 224 250 250 -51.92% Transfers In 37,022 17,773 18,855 - - -100.00% Total Revenues 618,188$ 256,442$ 387,963$ 65,250$ 65,250$ -74.56% Total Funds Available 618,337$ 257,671$ 389,192$ 65,262$ 65,262$ -74.67% EXPENDITURES General Government Grants 566,464$ 401,897$ 372,134$ 65,000$ 65,000$ -83.83% Police Grants 50,644 41,591 17,046 - - -100.00% Total Expenditures 617,108$ 443,488$ 389,180$ 65,000$ 65,000$ -85.34% Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 1,080$ (187,046)$ (1,217)$ 250$ 250$ Ending Fund Balance 1,229$ (185,817)$ 12$ 262$ 262$ Inter. Govt.  Revenue 99% Byrne Justice  Asst. Grant 0% ARRA Fund ‐Sources ARRA Fund ‐Uses This fund is prepared using the modified accrual basis of accounting. This accounting method recognizes revenues when they become measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. Expenditures are recognized when the related fund liability is incurred with the exception of several items. The full listing of these exceptions can be found in the Financial Policies on page F-1. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Fund accounts for revenue received and expenditures made by the City through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act enacted in 2009. These funds are primarily for one-time equipment and other purchases. Approved ARRA Fund revenues and expenditures are $65,000 in FY12. This represents the grant funded Sustainability Coordinator position in General Government. The grant will fund this position in ARRA for 3 years, from FY10 to FY12. General  Government  Grants 100% 189 City of College Station ARRA Operations and Maintenance Summary EXPENDITURE BY DIVISION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from DIVISION FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 ARRA Fund 617,108$ 443,488$ 389,180$ 65,000$ 65,000$ -83.30% ARRA Fund Total 617,108$ 443,488$ 389,180$ 65,000$ 65,000$ -85.34% EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from CLASSIFICATION FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Salaries & Benefits 27,573$ 65,000$ 65,544$ 65,000$ 65,000$ -0.83% Supplies 134,092 191,022 4,116 - - -100.00% Maintenance - - - - - N/A Purchased Services 300,972 - 5,209 - - -100.00% Capital Outlay 154,471 187,466 314,311 - - -100.00% ARRA Fund Total 617,108$ 443,488$ 389,180$ 65,000$ 65,000$ -85.34% PERSONNEL SUMMARY BY DIVISION Revised Approved Approved % Change in Actual Actual Budget Base Budget Budget Budget from DIVISION FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 General Government Grants - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00% ARRA Fund Total - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00% 190 Traffic Safety Fund  This fund is budgeted using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Under this basis, revenues are recognized when they become measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. Expenditures are recognized when the related fund liability is incurred with the exception of several items. The full listing of these exceptions can be found in the Financial Policies. The Texas Legislature passed SB 1119 which became effective on September 1, 2007. This bill authorizes and controls the municipal use of red light camera equipment and was codified in the Texas Transportation Code, Section 707.003. Revenue sharing provisions are mandatory: after accounting for program expenditures, one half of all revenues received must be remitted to the state. The state will be using their portion of the revenue received to fund regional trauma centers. The remaining revenue retained by the City must be spent on traffic safety programs, intersection improvements, pedestrian safety programs, public safety programs and/or traffic enforcement programs. The City implemented the red light camera program in calendar year 2008 with 4 monitored intersections. In FY09, cameras were added to 5 additional intersection approaches. On November 3, 2009, an election was held in which the majority of the voters voted to end the red light camera program. The FY12 approved budget includes the expenditure of $50,000 for the City of College Station’s participation in the B/CS Mobility Initiative. The B/CS Mobility Initiative is a collaboration between the cities of College Station and Bryan, Brazos County, Texas A&M University, the Bryan district of the Texas Department of Transportation, the Bryan/College Station Metropolitan Planning Organization, and the Texas Transportation Institute to improve the quality of transportation in the region through the coordination of traffic signals, data collection, and special events planning. This expenditure will use a portion of the remaining funds from the red light camera program. The remaining funds are proposed to be spent on miscellaneous traffic safety initiatives and improvents under the direction of the Public Works department and the fund will be closed out during FY12. Total FY12 approved expenditures total $72,959. 191 City of College Station Traffic Safety Fund Fund Summary FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 % Change in FY10 Revised Year-End Approved Approved Budget from Actual Budget Estimate Base Budget Budget FY11 to FY12 Beginning Fund Balance 170,470$ 149,764$ 149,764$ 71,559$ 71,559$ REVENUES Red Light Camera Citations 347,671$ -$ 1,035$ -$ -$ N/A Investment Earnings 3,959 1,603 1,300 1,400 1,400 -12.66% Total Revenues 351,630$ 1,603$ 2,335$ 1,400$ 1,400$ -12.66% Total Funds Available 522,100$ 151,367$ 152,099$ 72,959$ 72,959$ -51.80% EXPENDITURES & TRANSFERS Vendor Service Fees 170,148$ -$ -$ -$ -$ N/A B/CS Mobility Initiative - 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 0.00% General & Administrative Transfers 10,052 - - - - N/A Traffic Safety Programs 187,860 30,540 30,540 22,959 22,959 -24.82% Total Operating Expenditures and Transfers 368,060$ 80,540$ 80,540$ 72,959$ 72,959$ -9.41% Increase/Decrease in Fund Balance (16,430)$ (78,937)$ (78,205)$ (71,559)$ (71,559)$ -9.35% Measurement Focus Adjustment (4,276) Ending Fund Balance 149,764$ 70,827$ 71,559$ -$ -$ Traffic Safety Fund ‐Sources Traffic Safety Fund ‐Uses Red Light  Camera  Citations 0% Investment  Earnings 100% B/CS  Mobility  Initiative 69% Traffic Safety  Programs 31% 192 ########## FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 % Change in FY10 Revised Year-End Approved Approved Budget from Actual Budget Estimate Base Budget Budget FY11-FY12 BEGINNING BALANCE 2,587,367$ 3,256,768$ 3,256,768$ 3,230,548$ 3,230,548$ REVENUES Ad Valorem Taxes COCS 301,674$ -$ -$ -$ -$ N/A Ad Valorem Taxes CSISD 585,180 - - - - N/A Ad Valorem Taxes Brazos County 271,809 - - - - N/A Investment Earnings 9,928 15,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 -33.33% Total Revenues 1,168,592$ 15,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ -33.33% TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE 3,755,959$ 3,271,768$ 3,266,768$ 3,240,548$ 3,240,548$ -0.95% EXPENDITURES & TRANSFERS WPC Festival Site/Water Feature 431,141$ 3,033,313$ 35,934$ -$ -$ -100.00% Other 619 - 285 - - N/A Total Expenditures & Transfers 431,760$ 3,033,313$ 36,219$ -$ -$ -100.00% Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 736,832$ (3,018,313)$ (26,219)$ 10,000$ 10,000$ -100.33% Measurement Focus Adjustment (67,431) Reserved for Capital Projects -$ -$ -$ 3,026,177$ 3,026,177$ Unreserved Fund Balance 3,256,768 238,455 3,230,548 214,371 214,371 ENDING FUND BALANCE 3,256,768$ 238,455$ 3,230,548$ 3,240,548$ 3,240,548$ City of College Station Wolf Pen Creek TIF Fund Fund Summary The Wolf Pen Creek (WPC) TIF Fund accounts for ad valorem tax and other revenues that are accrued to the WPC TIF District. The fund also accounts for expenditures on projects that take place in the district. This fund is prepared on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Under this basis, revenues are recognized when they become measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. Expenditures are recognized when the related fund liability is incurred with the exception of several items. The full listing of these exceptions can be found in the Financial Policies on page F-1. The TIF expired on December 31, 2009. Therefore, no ad valorem revenue is estimated to be received in FY11 or FY12. In years past, the TIF received ad valorem taxes from the City of College Station, College Station Independent School District and Brazos County on the incremental increase in assessed valuation (captured value) over the base year (1989). The FY11 year end estimate includes expenditures of $35,934 for engineering work related to the construction of a Festival Site and Water Feature in the Wolf Pen Creek area. A total of $3,500,000 was budgeted in prior years for this project. Appropriations for capital projects carry forward from year to year until the project is complete. The balance of the total budget is estimated to be expended in FY12. 193 Municipal Court Fee Funds  The College Station Municipal Court collects a number of special fees that are authorized by the Texas State Legislature. These fees are the Court Technology Fee, Court Security Fee, Efficiency Time Payment Fee, and Juvenile Case Manager Fee. Other fees collected specifically for child safety are collected in the General Fund and are used to pay for school crossing guards. These fees are paid by those who pay tickets at College Station Municipal Court. These funds are prepared using the modified accrual basis of accounting. This accounting method realizes revenues when they become measurable and available to finance expenditures for the current period. Expenditures are recognized when the related fund liability is incurred with the exception of several items. The full listing of these exceptions can be found in the Financial Policies on page F-1. Court Technology Fee Fund  The Court Technology Fee Fund revenues can be used to fund technology projects at the Municipal Court Facility. Projects can include enhancements and improvements to the Municipal Court computer system and other improvements that involve technology. Defendants convicted of a misdemeanor offense in the municipal court shall pay a municipal court technology fee of $4.00 in addition to any other fines, penalties, or court costs required by city ordinance, state, or federal law. The Court Technology Fee Fund generates revenues from Court Technology fees. Total approved revenues are $101,750 in FY12. Revenues in this fund are anticipated to increase slightly in FY12 due to a shift in how credit card fees are being collected. Approved expenditures in the amount of $133,880 will be used for technology related purchases such as computer hardware and software for court facilities. Court Security Fee Fund  The Court Security Fee Fund revenues can be used to fund security personnel, security devices and security services for any building housing a municipal court of the city. Defendants convicted of a misdemeanor offense in the municipal court shall pay a municipal court building security fee of $3.00 in addition to any other fines, penalties, or court costs required by city ordinance, state, or federal law. Approved revenues in the fund are $58,750 in FY12. The total approved expenditures are $65,040 for court security personnel. Due to less than anticipated revenues, funding for one full-time Marshal position moved to the General Fund. Efficiency Time Payment Fund  The Efficiency Time Payment Fee can be used for the purpose of improving the efficiency of the administration of justice in College Station. Approved revenues in FY12 total $7,962. There are no approved expenditures in FY12 for this fund. For Financial Statement purposes, this fund is located in the Governmental Funds section of this book.  Juvenile Case Manager Fee Fund  The Juvenile Case Manager Fee revenues are used to fund the salary and benefits of a Juvenile Case Manager, as well as cover the salary and benefits of staff time spent administering the Teen Court program. As of June 2011, legislature has approved the use of these funds for training, travel, office supplies, and other necessary expenses relating to the position of the juvenile case manager to be paid from the Juvenile Case Manager fund. Defendants convicted of a misdemeanor offense in the municipal court shall pay a juvenile case manager fee of $5.00 in addition to any other fines, penalties, or court costs required by city ordinance, state, or federal law. Revenues in the Juvenile Case Manager Fund are $129,689 in FY12. FY12 expenditures in the amount of $97,900 will provide funding for the salary and benefits of the Juvenile Case Manager and the Community Programs Assistant positions. 194 City of College Station Court Technology Fee Fund Fund Summary 10/25/2011 14:43 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 % Change in FY10 Revised Year End Approved Approved Budget from Actual Budget Estimate Base Budget Budget FY11 to FY12 Beginning Fund Balance 320,305$ 332,433$ 332,433$ 346,080$ 346,080$ REVENUES Court Technology Fees 86,178$ 82,000$ 77,934$ 82,000$ 82,000$ 0.00% Investment Interest 2,995 3,220 1,860 1,750 1,750 -45.65% Other - - 9,413 18,000 18,000 N/A Total Revenues 89,173$ 85,220$ 89,207$ 101,750$ 101,750$ 19.40% Total Funds Available 409,478$ 417,653$ 421,640$ 447,830$ 447,830$ EXPENDITURES Court Technology Projects 75,710$ 101,980$ 75,560$ 133,880$ 133,880$ 31.28% Total Expenditures 75,710$ 101,980$ 75,560$ 133,880$ 133,880$ 31.28% Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 13,463$ (16,760)$ 13,647$ (32,130)$ (32,130)$ Measurement Focus Adjustment (1,335)$ Ending Fund Balance 332,433$ 315,673$ 346,080$ 313,950$ 313,950$ Court Technology Fund ‐Sources Court Technology Fund ‐Uses Court  Technology  Fees 98% Investment  Interest 2% Court  Technology  Projects 100% 195 City of College Station Court Security Fee Fund Fund Summary 10/25/2011 14:45 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 % Change in FY10 Revised Year End Approved Approved Budget from Actual Budget Estimate Base Budget Budget FY11 to FY12 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 209,889$ 156,611$ 156,611$ 93,188$ 93,188$ REVENUES Court Security Fees 64,628$ 64,640$ 58,441$ 58,000$ 58,000$ -10.27% Investment Interest 1,526 2,368 837 750 750 -68.33% Other - - - - - N/A Total Revenues 66,154$ 67,008$ 59,278$ 58,750$ 58,750$ -12.32% Total Funds Available 276,043$ 223,619$ 215,889$ 151,938$ 151,938$ EXPENDITURES Court Security 118,806$ 118,298$ 122,701$ 65,040$ 65,040$ -45.02% Total Expenditures 118,806$ 118,298$ 122,701$ 65,040$ 65,040$ -45.02% Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance (52,652)$ (51,290)$ (63,423)$ (6,290)$ (6,290)$ Measurement Focus Adjustment (626)$ Ending Fund Balance 156,611$ 105,321$ 93,188$ 86,898$ 86,898$ Court Security Fees Court Security Fund ‐Sources 98.72% Investment Interest 1.28% Court Security 100% Court Security Fund ‐Uses 196 City of College Station Court Security Fund  Operations & Maintenance Summary EXPENDITURE BY DIVISION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Court Security 118,807$ 118,298$ 122,701$ 65,040$ 65,040$ -45.02% TOTAL 118,807$ 118,298$ 122,701$ 65,040$ 65,040$ -45.02% EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Salaries & Benefits 118,202$ 118,298$ 122,551$ 64,836$ 64,836$ -45.19% Supplies 605 - 150 204 204 N/A Maintenance - - - - - N/A Purchased Services - - - - - N/A Capital Outlay - - - - - N/A TOTAL 118,807$ 118,298$ 122,701$ 65,040$ 65,040$ -45.02% PERSONNEL Revised Approved Approved % Change in Actual Actual Budget Base Budget Budget Budget from FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Court Security 2.50 2.50 2.00 1.00 1.00 -50.00% TOTAL 2.50 2.50 2.00 1.00 1.00 -50.00% * One full-time Marshal position was moved into the General Fund Court budget beginning in FY12. 197 City of College Station Juvenile Case Manager Fee Fund FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 % Change in FY10 Revised Year-End Approved Approved Budget from Actual Budget Estimate Base Budget Budget FY11 to FY12 Beginning Fund Balance 240,331$ 290,800$ 290,800$ 337,884$ 337,884$ REVENUES Juvenile Case Manager Fees 129,387$ 128,000$ 126,495$ 128,000$ 128,000$ 0.00% Interest Earnings 2,329 2,776 2,644 1,689 1,689 -39.16% Total Revenues 131,716$ 130,776$ 129,139$ 129,689$ 129,689$ -0.83% Total Funds Available 372,047$ 421,576$ 419,939$ 467,573$ 467,573$ EXPENDITURES Operating Expenditures 80,084$ 90,148$ 82,055$ 97,900$ 97,900$ 8.60% Total Expenditures 80,084$ 90,148$ 82,055$ 97,900$ 97,900$ 8.60% Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 51,632$ 40,628$ 47,084$ 31,789$ 31,789$ Measurement Focus Adjustment (1,163)$ Ending Fund Balance 290,800$ 331,428$ 337,884$ 369,673$ 369,673$ Juvenile Case Manager Fees 99% Juvenile Case Manager Fund ‐Sources 99% Interest Earnings 1% Operating Expenditures 100% Juvenile Case Manager Fund ‐Uses 198 City of College Station Juvenile Case Manager Fee Fund  Operations & Maintenance Summary EXPENDITURE BY DIVISION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Juvenile Case Manager 80,084$ 91,566$ 82,055$ 97,900$ 97,900$ 6.92% TOTAL 80,084$ 91,566$ 82,055$ 97,900$ 97,900$ 6.92% EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Salaries & Benefits 80,084$ 91,566$ 82,055$ 92,995$ 92,995$ 1.56% Supplies - - - - - N/A Maintenance - - - - - N/A Purchased Services - - - 4,905 4,905 N/A Capital Outlay - - - - - N/A TOTAL 80,084$ 91,566$ 82,055$ 97,900$ 97,900$ 6.92% PERSONNEL Revised Approved Approved % Change in Actual Actual Budget Base Budget Budget Budget from FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Juvenile Case Manager 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 0.00% TOTAL 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 0.00% 199 City of College Staiton Police Seizure Fund Summary 11/4/2011 15:25 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 % Change in FY10 Revised Year-End Approved Approved Budget from Actual Budget Estimate Base Budget Budget FY11 to FY12 Beginning Fund Balance 52,723$ 62,100$ 62,100$ 61,753$ 61,753$ REVENUES Police Seizure Revenues 54,889$ 20,000$ 12,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 0.00% Investment Earnings 648 735 500 525 525 -28.57% Other - - - - - N/A Total Revenues 55,537$ 20,735$ 12,500$ 20,525$ 20,525$ -1.01% Total Funds Available 108,260 82,835$ 74,600$ 82,278$ 82,278$ -0.67% EXPENDITURES Police Seizure Programs 46,382$ 20,000$ 12,000$ 40,000$ 40,000$ 100.00% Contingency - - - - - N/A General & Administrative Transfer 796 847 847 - - -100.00% Total Expenditures 47,178$ 20,847$ 12,847$ 40,000$ 40,000$ 91.87% Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 8,359$ (112)$ (347)$ (19,475)$ (19,475)$ Measurement Focus Adjustment 1,018$ Ending Fund Balance 62,100$ 61,988$ 61,753$ 42,278$ 42,278$ Police Seizure Fund ‐Sources Police Seizure  P Police Seizure Fund ‐Uses This fund is prepared using the modified accrual basis of accounting. This accounting method recognizes revenues when they become measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. Expenditures are recognized when the related fund liability is incurred with the exception of several items. The full listing of these exceptions can be found in the Financial Policies on page F-1. The Police Seizure Fund accounts for items received by the City through the Police Department as a result of criminal investigations. These funds are used for one-time equipment and other purchases to assist in police activities. Police Seizure Fund revenues are estimated to be $20,525 in FY12. Expenditures of $40,000 are budgeted in FY12. The FY12 ending fund balance is anticipated to decrease 31.5% when compared to the FY11 estimated ending fund balance. The expected decrease in fund balance is due appropriations being increased from $20,000 to $40,000 in FY12 for the one-time purchase of additional equipment. Police Seizure  Revenues 97% Investment  Earnings 3% Programs 100% 200 DRAFT ######## 11/4/11 3:26 PM FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 % Change in FY10 Revised Year-End Approved Approved Budget From Actual Budget Estimate Base Budget Budget FY11-FY12 REVENUES Lot Sales 212,583$ 250,547$ 218,172$ 227,293$ 227,293$ (9.28%) Investment Earnings 3,082 15,700 5,000 5,000 5,000 (68.15%) Other - - - - - N/A Total Revenues 215,665$ 266,247$ 223,172$ 232,293$ 232,293$ (12.75%) EXPENDITURES General & Administrative Transfers -$ 2,764$ 2,764$ -$ -$ (100.00%) Total Expenditures -$ 2,764$ 2,764$ -$ -$ (100.00%) Increase/Decrease in Fund Balance 215,665$ 263,483$ 220,408$ 232,293$ 232,293 Beginning Fund Balance 586,347$ 802,012$ 802,012$ 1,022,420$ 1,022,420$ Ending Fund Balance 802,012$ 1,065,495$ 1,022,420$ 1,254,713$ 1,254,713$ City of College Station Memorial Cemetery Fund Fund Summary Lot Sales 98% Memorial Cemetery Fund ‐Sources This fund is prepared on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Under this basis, revenues are recognized when they become measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. Expenditures are recognized when the related fund liability is incurred with the exception of several items. The full listing of these exceptions can be found in the Financial Policies. The Memorial Cemetery Fund is a Special Revenue Fund that accounts for two thirds of the sales of cemetery lots and other revenues that are accrued through the new Memorial Cemetery, which includes the Aggie Field of Honor. For FY12, estimated revenue earnings are included at $232,293. Revenues are anticipated from the sale of lots at the new site and from investment earnings. No expenditures are included in the FY12 approved budget in the Memorial Cemetery Fund. The Operations and Maintenance costs associated with the Memorial Cemetery Fund are included in the General Fund Parks and Recreation Department budget. The FY12 estimated ending fund balance is anticipated to increase 22.72% when compared to the FY11 estimated ending fund balance. The expected increase in fund balance is due to the lot sale and investment earning revenue estimated to be received in the fund in FY12. Investment  Earnings 2% 201 DRAFT 11/4/11 12:37 PM ############ FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 % Change in FY10 Revised Year-End Approved Approved Budget From Actual Budget Estimate Base Budget Budget FY11-FY12 REVENUES Lot Sales 100,419$ 123,404$ 107,458$ 111,951$ 111,951$ (9.28%) Investment Earnings 1,227 5,400 2,000 2,000 2,000 (62.96%) Other - - - - - N/A Total Revenues 101,646$ 128,804$ 109,458$ 113,951$ 113,951$ (11.53%) EXPENDITURES Advertising 50,696$ 13,395$ 13,395$ 10,000$ 10,000$ (25.35%) Other - - 24 - - N/A Total Expenditures 50,696$ 13,395$ 13,419$ 10,000$ 10,000$ (25.35%) Increase/Decrease in Fund Balance 50,950$ 115,409$ 96,039$ 103,951$ 103,951$ Beginning Fund Balance 244,845$ 295,795$ 295,795$ 391,834$ 391,834$ Ending Fund Balance 295,795$ 411,204$ 391,834$ 495,785$ 495,785$ City of College Station Memorial Cemetery Perpetual Care Fund Fund Summary Lot Sales 98% Memorial Cemetery Perpetual   Care Fund ‐Sources Advertising 100% Memorial Cemetery Perpetual   Care Fund ‐Uses This fund is prepared on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Under this basis, revenues are recognized when they become measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. Expenditures are recognized when the related fund liability is incurred with the exception of several items. The full listing of these exceptions can be found in the Financial Policies. The Memorial Cemetery Perpetual Care Fund is Special Revenue Fund that accounts for one third of cemetery lot sales that are accrued through the Memorial Cemetery. For FY12, revenues are projected at $113,951. Revenues are projected to come from the sale of lots at the new site and from interest earnings. FY12 expenditures are estimated to be $10,000 for additional marketing efforts of the cemetery. The FY12 estimated ending fund balance is anticipated to increase approximately 27% when compared to the FY11 estimated ending fund balance. The expected increase in fund balance is due to the lot sale and investment earnings revenue estimated to be received in the fund in FY12. Investment  Earnings 2% 202 City of College Station Cemetery Perpetual Care Fund Fund Summary ############# FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 % Change in FY10 Revised Year-End Approved Approved Budget from Actual Budget Estimate Base Budget Budget FY11 to FY12 Beginning Fund Balance 1,654,570$ 1,683,022$ 1,683,022$ 1,710,982$ 1,710,982$ REVENUES Sale of Cemetery Lots 24,725$ 15,000$ 20,000$ 15,000$ 15,000$ 0.00% Investment Income 7,640 20,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 (60.00%) Other (800) - - - - N/A Total Revenues 31,565$ 35,000$ 28,000$ -$ 23,000$ (34.29%) Total Funds Available 1,686,135$ 1,718,022$ 1,711,022$ 1,710,982$ 1,733,982$ 0.93% EXPENDITURES & TRANSFERS Other 3,113$ -$ 40$ -$ -$ N/A Total Expenditures & Transfers 3,113$ -$ 40$ -$ -$ N/A Increase in Fund Balance 28,452$ 35,000$ 27,960$ -$ 23,000$ Ending Fund Balance 1,683,022$ 1,718,022$ 1,710,982$ 1,710,982$ 1,733,982$ Cemetery Perpetual Care Fund ‐Sources This fund is budgeted using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Under this basis, revenues are recognized when they become measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. Expenditures are recognized when the related fund liability is incurred with the exception of several items. The full listing of these exceptions can be found in the Financial Policies. The Cemetery Perpetual Care Fund is a Special Revenue Fund that accounts for sales of cemetery lots and other revenues that are accrued through the College Station Cemetery. No expenditures are budgeted in this fund for FY12. The Operations and Maintenance costs associated with the Cemetery Perpetual Care Fund are included in the General Fund Parks and Recreation Department budget. For FY12, revenues are budgeted at $23,000. The College Station Cemetery has a limited number of lots remaining for sale and, therefore, revenues are projected to decrease. Sale of Cemetery Lots 65% Investment Income 35% 203 Special Revenue   Capital Improvement Projects  These funds are budgeted using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Under this basis, revenues are recognized when they become measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. Expenditures are recognized when the related fund liability is incurred with the exception of several items. The full listing of these exceptions can be found in the Financial Policies. SPECIAL REVENUE CAPITAL PROJECTS Below are descriptions of the special revenue capital projects included in the FY12 Approved Budget. The funds expended on these projects are considered significant and non-routine. Park Land Dedication Capital Improvement Projects The Park Land Dedication Funds account for the receipt and expenditure of funds received by the City from residential land developers who dedicate land, or money in lieu of land, for use in the development of neighborhood parks in residential areas. The projects in the Park Land Dedication Capital Improvement Projects Funds are funded using the dedicated park land funds. Park Land dedication funds must be used for the development of parks within the zone to which the funds are dedicated. In FY12, expenditures for Park Land Dedication projects are estimated at $1,420,175 for projects that are anticipated to be completed in the various park zones. Funds in the amount of $4,895 are included for improvements at University Park. These improvements will include additional parking and a retaining wall at the large dog pond. The Park Land Dedication funds for this project will be supplemented with Neighborhood Park Improvement bond funds. An estimated $36,000 is included for improvements at Carter Crossing Park. The park will be constructed in phases as funds become available and is planned to ultimately include sidewalks, an entry plaza, a tot playground, creek crossings, benches and trees with irrigation. $208,280 is the FY12 estimated expenditure for improvements at Southwest Park. This phase of the project will be the construction of a 10 foot wide hike and bike trail through Southwest Park. The trail will connect with the north end of the Campus Village Trail and will continue to Southwest Parkway. The project will include a bridge crossing, retaining wall, and box culverts. The project will be designed in-house by Public Works staff. It is estimated that $10,000 will be spent in FY12 for phase III of John Crompton Park. The total project budget for this phase is $149,000. The FY12 expenditure reflects the estimate of what is needed to complete this phase of the project. Additional funds are projected in a number of Park Land zones but these funds have not yet been obligated to specific projects. These funds are available to be used for projects that arise throughout the year within the applicable zones. Funds not used in the fiscal year will carry over to future fiscal years. Drainage Capital Improvement Projects  Drainage capital projects are funded by revenue generated through a drainage utility fee that is collected from residential and commercial utility users. Significant projects include a projected $355,000 for Greenways land acquisition throughout the City. The City’s Greenways Master Plan calls for future trail development in urban and suburban greenways. The funds for this project were from prior years’ debt issue. $200,000 is included for Minor Drainage Improvement projects. These funds are used for minor unscheduled drainage projects that arise throughout the fiscal year. $286,000 is included for Erosion Control in the Wolf Pen Creek trail area. Bank stabilization measures will be designed and constructed to protect the trails, irrigation, benches and other improvements in the upper trails area from erosion. An estimated $50,070 is included for Stormwater Mapping projects. These funds will be used for mapping of the City’s stormwater infrastructure. Finally, $500,000 is included for the completion of a Drainage Master Plan. The results of the study will be an inventory of existing infrastructure and a twenty (20) year maintenance and infrastructure improvement plan for those portions of the drainage basins that lie within the city limits. The plan will form the foundation for future infrastructure projects. Wolf Pen Creek TIF Capital Projects  The Wolf Pen Creek (WPC) TIF Fund accounts for ad valorem tax and other revenues that are accrued to the WPC TIF District. The fund also accounts for expenditures on projects that take place in the district. The TIF expired on December 31, 2009. A balance of approximately $3.2 million remains in the WPC TIF Fund. A determination will be made in FY12 as to how the remaining balance will be spent. Additional O&M Costs The FY12 Approved Budget includes a number of special revenue capital projects that have been recently completed and 204 have added operations and maintenance (O&M) expense. In some situations, the O&M cost of a project is minimal and can be absorbed by the City department that is benefiting the most from the project. In other situations, the O&M cost is more significant and funding for these additional expenses is addressed through the Service Level Adjustment (SLA) process. In these situations, SLAs are submitted for the O&M needs of the capital projects and funding is considered as part of the budget process (i.e. for additional personnel). In some situations the anticipated O&M cost is added to the base budget (i.e. additional budget for utility costs). Funds have been included in the FY12 Approved Parks and Recreation base budget for estimated O&M costs associated with several Special Revenue capital projects. $15,000 has been included to cover estimated supply and landscaping costs in Southwest Park. In addition, $150 has been included for electric utility costs related to the Rain Water Harvesting project that is anticipated will be completed in FY11. Finally, $92,000 has been for estimated O&M costs associated with capital projects in the WPC TIF area. Estimated costs include funds for temporary/seasonal personnel, supplies, contract labor and utility costs. Departments are expected to consider the impact of current and planned capital improvement projects on operations and maintenance (O&M) budgets. This analysis is a component of the 5-year Strategic Business Plans that are completed by all City departments. Projections as to the impact of capital projects on O&M budgets that are included in the Strategic Business Plans are used by the Finance Office in financial forecasting. A more detailed sheet at the end of this section reflects the estimated O&M costs associated with the special revenue capital projects. It is anticipated that the availability of funding for the O&M costs will be limited in upcoming years. Therefore, departments will continue to evaluate current operations before increases in budget will be approved. Recommendations may also be made to delay projects for which O&M funding does not exist. 205 GENERAL GOVERNMENT PARK LAND DEDICATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 PROJECT REVISED APPROVED PROJECT BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS FY 10-11 FY 11-12 NUMBER AMOUNT THROUGH FY10 APPROPRIATIONS APPROPRIATIONS BEGINNING FUND BALANCE:1,319,067$ 1,587,848$ ADDITIONAL RESOURCES: CONTRIBUTIONS 300,000$ 300,000$ INVESTMENT EARNINGS 16,000 5,000 INTRAGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS - - OTHER - - SUBTOTAL ADDITIONAL RESOURCES 316,000$ 305,000$ TOTAL RESOURCES AVAILABLE 1,635,067$ 1,892,848$ PARKLAND DEDICATION FUND ZONE 1 PARK PK0051 15,000 - 18,000 15,000 ZONE 2 PARK PK0052 20,000 - - 20,000 UNIVERSITY PARK PK0410 12,000 - 12,000 - ZONE 3 PARK PK0053 85,000 - 70,000 85,000 CENTRAL PK RAINWATER HARVESTING PK1013 50,000 50,000 - - ZONE 4 PARK PK0054 - - 37,000 - CARTER CROSSING PARK PK1202 36,000 - - 36,000 ZONE 5 PARK PK0055 - - - - ZONE 6 PARK PK0056 95,000 - 95,000 95,000 SOUTHWEST PARK DEVELOPMENT PK0806 268,000 258,000 10,000 - ZONE 7 PARK PK0057 10,000 - - 10,000 JOHN CROMPTON PARK PHASE III PK0904 149,000 114,000 35,000 - ZONE 8 PARK PK0058 - - - - EMERALD FOREST PARK IMP.PK0713 63,000 48,000 15,000 - ZONE 9 PARK PK0059 20,000 - - 20,000 ZONE 10 PARK PK0060 285,000 170,000 285,000 ZONE 11 PARK PK0061 - - 32,000 - ZONE 12 PARK PK0824 24,000 - 24,000 24,000 ZONE 13 PARK PK0807 - - - - ZONE 14 PARK PK0717 77,000 - 77,000 77,000 ZONE 15 PARK PK0808 325,000 - 268,000 325,000 COMMUNITY PARK ZONE B PK1203 155,000 - - 155,000 SOUTHWOOD VALLEY IMP PK1117 60,000 - 60,000 - COMMUNITY PARK ZONE C PK1204 35,000 - - 35,000 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK ZONE 24 PK1205 15,000 - - 15,000 CLOSED PROJECTS 103,500 - CAPITAL PROJECTS SUBTOTAL 470,000$ 1,026,500$ 1,197,000$ OTHER - - GENERAL & ADMIN. CHARGES 19,513 26,373 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,046,013$ 1,223,373$ CAFR Adjustment ENDING FUND BALANCE:589,054$ 669,475$ BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS 206 GENERAL GOVERNMENT PARK LAND DEDICATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 PROJECT EXPENDITURES ACTUAL ESTIMATE PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED THROUGH FY09 FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 1,489,259$ 1,669,186$ 1,587,848$ 453,160$ 431,787$ 416,787$ 401,787$ 386,787$ 590,487$ 300,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,879 8,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 596,366$ 308,000$ 305,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 2,085,625$ 1,977,186$ 1,892,848$ 458,160$ 436,787$ 421,787$ 406,787$ 391,787$ - - - 15,000 - - - - - - - - 20,000 - - - - - 1,785 5,320 4,895 - - - - - - - - 85,000 - - - - - - - 50,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - 36,000 - - - - - - 650 - - - - - - - - 502 - 95,000 - - - - - 220 - 59,500 208,280 - - - - - - - - 10,000 - - - - - 54,957 27,956 56,087 10,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 63,000 - - - - - - - - - 20,000 - - - - - - - - 285,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 24,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 77,000 - - - - - - 6 - 325,000 - - - - - - - - 155,000 - - - - - - - 60,000 - - - - - - - - - 35,000 - - - - - - - - 15,000 - - - - - 372,767 82,000 55,177$ 403,666$ 375,907$ 1,420,175$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - - - - - - - 13,431 19,513 26,373 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 417,097$ 389,338$ 1,439,688$ 26,373$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 658$ 1,669,186$ 1,587,848$ 453,160$ 431,787$ 416,787$ 401,787$ 386,787$ 371,787$ PROJECTED EXPENDITURES 207 DRAINAGE UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 PROJECT REVISED APPROVED PROJECT BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS FY10-11 FY11-12 NUMBER AMOUNT THROUGH FY10 APPROPRIATIONS APPROPRIATIONS BEGINNING FUND BALANCE:2,216,320$ 2,244,529$ ADDITIONAL RESOURCES: UTILITY REVENUES 1,886,800$ 1,976,200$ INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 29,900 8,100 BOND PROCEEDS - - INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS - - INTRAGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS 14,000 13,473 TRANSFERS OUT - - OTHER - - SUBTOTAL ADDITIONAL RESOURCES 1,930,700$ 1,997,773$ TOTAL RESOURCES AVAILABLE 4,147,020$ 4,242,302$ DRAINAGE CAPITAL GREENWAYS PROJECTS SD9903 3,640,000$ 3,640,000 - - MINOR DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS SD1201 ANNUAL 70,407 123,851 200,000 EMERALD FOREST DRAINAGE IMP SD1006 257,120$ 237,120 20,000 - SOUTHWOOD 5-7 SD1103 56,149$ - 56,149 - WOLF PEN CREEK EROSION CONTROL SD1102 312,000$ - 50,500 261,500 STORMWATER MAPPING SD0523 67,070$ 34,070 16,000 - MTIGATION FENCING - ARRINGTON/DECATUR SD0901 100,000$ 100,000 - - DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN SD1202 500,000$ - - 500,000 CLOSED PROJECTS - - - CAPITAL G&A 212,922 160,510 CAPITAL PROJECTS SUBTOTAL 479,422$ 1,122,010$ BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS DRAINAGE OPERATIONS DRAINAGE INSPECTION (PLANNING & DEV SERVICES) ANNUAL - 74,300 DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS (PUBLIC WORKS)ANNUAL 869,531 941,713 PAY PLAN CONTINGENCY - - MOSQUITO ABATEMENT 7,200 7,200 BEE CREEK MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING (SD0902)28,000 13,000 TRANSFERS OUT 65,000 - GENERAL & ADMIN. 315,451 330,845 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,764,604$ 2,489,068$ Measurement Focus Adjustment ENDING FUND BALANCE: 2,382,416$ 1,753,234$ 208 DRAINAGE UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 PROJECT EXPENDITURES ACTUAL ESTIMATED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED THROUGH FY09 FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 2,932,126$ 2,505,270$ 2,244,529$ 1,323,664$ 1,276,382$ 1,568,615$ 1,883,773$ 2,216,317$ 1,895,263$ 1,918,632$ 1,976,200$ 2,035,500$ 2,096,600$ 2,159,500$ 2,224,300$ 2,291,000$ 14,915 12,000 8,100 10,000 10,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 13,473 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,910,178$ 1,930,632$ 1,997,773$ 2,045,500$ 2,106,600$ 2,169,500$ 2,236,300$ 2,305,000$ 4,842,304$ 4,435,902$ 4,242,302$ 3,369,164$ 3,382,982$ 3,738,115$ 4,120,073$ 4,521,317$ 2,356,401 493,106 127,500 355,000 307,993 - - - - - 194,258 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 - 41,192 215,928 - - - - - - - - 56,149 - - - - - - - - 26,000 286,000 - - - - - - - - 50,070 17,000 - - - - 2,944 15,764 40,800 - - - - - - - - - 500,000 - - - - - 409,121 81,877 212,922 160,510 165,325 170,285 175,394 180,655 186,075 959,182$ 955,434$ 1,551,580$ 690,318$ 370,285$ 375,394$ 380,655$ 386,075$ PROJECTED EXPENDITURES - - 74,300 76,529 78,825 81,190 83,625 86,134 817,631 820,288 941,713 969,964 999,063 1,029,035 1,059,906 1,091,703 - - - - - - 17,760 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 - 28,000 13,000 8,000 8,000 - - - - 65,000 - - - - - - 555,426 315,451 330,845 340,770 350,993 361,523 372,369 383,540 2,349,999$ 2,191,373$ 2,918,638$ 2,092,782$ 1,814,367$ 1,854,342$ 1,903,756$ 1,954,653$ 12,965 2,505,270$ 2,244,529$ 1,323,664$ 1,276,382$ 1,568,615$ 1,883,773$ 2,216,317$ 2,566,665$ 209 Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 Comments Parkland Dedication Southwest Park Development 15,000 15,450 15,914 16,391 16,883 17,389 Supplies and landscaping contract Rain Water Harvesting 150 155 159 164 169 174 Electric utility costs Parkland Projects Totals 15,150$ 15,605$ 16,073$ 16,555$ 17,051$ 17,563$ Wolf Pen Creek (WPC) TIF Projects WPC TIF Capital Projects 92,000 94,760 97,603 100,531 103,547 106,653 Temporary/seasonal personnel, supplies, chemicals, contract labor and utility costs WPC Projects Totals 92,000$ 94,760$ 97,603$ 100,531$ 103,547$ 106,653$ Total Estimated O&M Costs 107,150$ 110,365$ 113,675$ 117,086$ 120,598$ 124,216$ Special Revenue Funds Capital Improvement Projects Estimated Operations and Maintenance Costs* *The Operations and Maintenance costs reflected above are estimates based on anticipated costs associated with each project. In some situations, the O&M cost of a project is minimal and can be absorbed by the City department that is benefiting the most from the project. In other situations, the O&M cost is more significant and funding for these additional expenses is addressed through the Service Level Adjustment (SLA) process. As the projects become better defined, the O&M estimates may be revised. 210 Insurance Funds  The City of College Station is partially self-insured for property casualty and general liability, workers compensation and unemployment compensation. The City became self-funded for employee and dependent health care in January 2004. The current program is administered by Blue Cross/Blue Shield. These Insurance Funds are accounted for as Internal Service Funds. Actuarially-based charges are made to each of the operating funds using relevant bases (i.e., health insurance is charged monthly per full-time participating employee, while unemployment and worker’s compensation are charged as a percentage of gross salary). This method of funding allows the City to more accurately reflect the costs of claims against the various funds and to minimize potential risks. For financial statement reporting, Insurance Funds (Internal Service Funds) are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. The Insurance Funds (Internal Service Funds) are budgeted using the modified accrual basis of accounting and the current financial resources measurement focus. The budget measures the net change in working capital (current assets less current liabilities). The measurement focus adjustment to arrive at Actual 2010 Working Capital is necessary because the insurance funds’ (internal service funds’) working capital results from using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting for financial reporting purposes. Property and Casualty Fund Property casualty costs are anticipated to increase in the future as the cost of insurance and litigation rises. Changes that have occurred in the last several years include increasing the deductibles for the City and implementing risk management and safety programs that better controls claims and costs. FY12 revenue premiums are based on the actual amounts assigned to the various operating activity centers. Approved investment earnings are $1,000 and other revenues $30,000. The total approved revenues for the Property Casualty Fund are $1,492,910. Approved expenditures in this fund are $1,637,161. Legal expenses due to ongoing litigation have resulted in higher costs in recent years. Claim costs are projected to be higher this year and premiums are anticipated to remain fairly flat. The FY12 estimated ending working capital is anticipated to decrease 73% when compared to the FY11 estimated ending working capital. Contributions to this fund were increased in FY11 to increase the fund balance. The contribution level has been brought back down in FY12. Employee Benefits Fund The City has developed several health care plans for city employees to help meet the needs of rising health care costs. Approved revenues in this fund are $9,003,244. Efforts over the last several years to increase the balance in this fund have been successful. Through education and training programs, efforts are being made to reduce claims incurred. Plan changes are being put in place to help control costs. These changes include increasing deductibles and copayments. City contributions and employee contributions will increase by 10% this fiscal year. FY12 expenditures are based on estimates of future claims, premiums, and other miscellaneous costs. The total approved expenditures for the Benefits Fund is $9,138,943. Workers Compensation Fund Budgeted premiums are based on the actual amounts charged to departments to cover the City’s Workers Compensation costs. Approved FY12 revenues in this fund are $805,538. In FY11, premiums were reduced in this fund to provide for a one- time contribution to the Property Casualty Fund. For FY12, the premiums have been restored to FY10 contribution levels. The total approved expenditures in this fund for FY12 are $747,874. There are adequate resources in the working capital of the fund to absorb these expenditures. Unemployment Fund Revenues in this fund are collected based as a percentage of each employee’s salary. The total revenues for FY12 are $230,042. Claims costs are anticipated to rise in FY12, approved expenditures in this fund are $260,600. The FY12 estimated ending working capital is anticipated to decrease 15% compared to the FY11 estimated ending working capital. This is a result of FY12 claims cost being higher than in FY11. 211 City of College Station Property Casualty Fund Summary FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 % Change in FY10 Revised Year-End Approved Approved Budget from Actual Budget Estimate Base Budget Budget FY11 to FY12 Beginning Working Capital, accrual basis of accounting 180,072$ (224,418)$ (224,418)$ 197,037$ 197,037$ REVENUES Premiums 944,618$ 1,721,200$ 1,721,200$ 1,461,910$ 1,461,910$ -15.06% Investment Earnings 2,344 3,400 3,400 1,000 1,000 -70.59% Other 114,604 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 0.00% Total Revenues 1,061,567$ 1,754,600$ 1,754,600$ 1,492,910$ 1,492,910$ -14.91% EXPENDITURES AND TRANSFERS Administration 90,155$ 114,353$ 116,862$ 80,661$ 80,661$ -29.46% Professional Services 6,000 6,000 10,500 10,500 10,500 75.00% Administration Fees (Appraisals)- 22,880 - - - -100.00% Defense Costs 899,685 615,000 600,000 924,000 924,000 50.24% Third Party Administraton Fees - - 26,000 26,000 26,000 N/A Claims 196,164 300,000 330,000 346,500 346,500 15.50% Premiums 265,758 284,000 236,283 248,000 248,000 -12.68% Reimbursed Administration - - 12,000 - - N/A Other Operating 2,208 - 1,500 1,500 1,500 N/A Pay Plan - 542 - - - -100.00% Total Operating Expenses & Xfers 1,459,969$ 1,342,775$ 1,333,145$ 1,637,161$ 1,637,161$ 21.92% Increase (Decrease) in Working Capital, modified accrual budgetary basis (398,401)$ 411,825$ 421,455$ (144,251)$ (144,251)$ Measurement Focus Adjustment (6,089)$ Ending Working Capital, accrual basis of accounting (224,418)$ 187,407$ 197,037$ 52,786$ 52,786$ Year-End Estimate: premiums based on once yearly payment to 3rd party insurance (Malpractice EMS & EM Advisor, special event coverage (parks) and prop/casualty premiums). Premiums 97.92% Investment  Earnings 0.07% Other 2.01% Property Casualty Fund ‐Sources Administration 4.93% Professional  Services 0.64% Administration  Fees  (Appraisals) 0.00% Defense Costs 56.44% Third Party  Administraton  Fees 1.59% Claims 21.16% Premiums 15.15% Other Operating 0.09% Property Casualty Fund ‐Uses 212 City of College Station Property Casualty Fund  Operations & Maintenance Summary EXPENDITURE BY DIVISION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Property Casualty 96,155$ 120,353$ 127,362$ 91,161$ 91,161$ -24.26% TOTAL 96,155$ 120,353$ 127,362$ 91,161$ 91,161$ -24.26% EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Salaries & Benefits 90,155$ 114,353$ 116,862$ 80,661$ 80,661$ -29.46% Supplies - - - - - N/A Maintenance - - - - - N/A Purchased Services 6,000 6,000 10,500 10,500 10,500 75.00% Capital Outlay - - - - - N/A TOTAL 96,155$ 120,353$ 127,362$ 91,161$ 91,161$ -24.26% PERSONNEL Revised Approved Approved % Change in Actual Actual Budget Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Property Casualty 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 -33.33% TOTAL 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 0.00% 213 City of College Station Employee Benefits Fund Summary 11/4/2011 14:08 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 % Change in FY10 Revised Year-End Approved Approved Budget from Actual Budget Estimate Base Budget Budget FY11 to FY12 Beginning Working Capital, accrual basis of accounting 4,332,763$ 3,352,789$ 3,352,789$ 2,918,176$ 2,918,176$ REVENUES City Contribution 5,571,809$ 6,528,909$ 6,404,833$ 7,390,188$ 7,390,188$ 13.19% Employee Contribution 1,574,933 1,588,000 1,378,200 1,513,800 1,513,800 -4.67% COBRA Premiums 25,069 10,000 10,000 10,100 10,100 1.00% Other Operating Revenues 66,559 71,015 71,015 74,566 74,566 5.00% Investment Earnings 44,289 29,583 29,583 14,590 14,590 -50.68% Intergovernmental 13,914 - 5,000 - - N/A Total Revenues 7,296,573$ 8,227,507$ 7,898,631$ 9,003,244$ 9,003,244$ 9.43% Total Funds Available 11,629,336$ 11,580,296$ 11,251,420$ 11,921,420$ 11,921,420$ 2.95% EXPENDITURES & TRANSFERS Administration 71,238$ 71,841$ 74,340$ 74,808$ 74,808$ 4.13% Administration Fees 484,467 504,711 508,067 533,038 533,038 5.61% Claims 6,712,577 7,627,890 6,570,713 7,259,389 7,259,389 -4.83% Premiums 789,566 922,381 987,613 1,029,863 1,029,863 11.65% General & Administrative Transfers 29,248 40,000 40,000 40,000 62,375 55.94% Other Operating 91,377 168,617 152,511 154,470 154,470 -8.39% Contingency - 25,000 - 25,000 25,000 0.00% Pay Plan - 533 - - - -100.00% Total Operating Expenses & Transfers 8,178,473$ 9,360,973$ 8,333,244$ 9,116,568$ 9,138,943$ -2.37% Increase (Decrease) in Working Capital, modified accrual budgetary basis (881,900)$ (1,133,466)$ (434,613)$ (113,324)$ (135,699)$ Measurement Focus Adjustment (98,074)$ Ending Working Capital, accrual basis of accounting 3,352,789$ 2,219,323$ 2,918,176$ 2,804,852$ 2,782,477$ Admin 0.75% Admin Fees 5.39% Claims 79.43% Premiums 11.27%G&ATransfers 0.68% Other  Operating 1.69% Pay Plan 0.00% Employee Benefits Fund ‐Uses City  Contribution 82.08% Employee  Contribution 16.81% COBRA  Premiums 0.11% Other  Operating  Revenue 0.83% Investment  Earnings 0.16% Employee Benefits Fund ‐Sources 214 City of College Station Employee Benefits Fund  Operations & Maintenance Summary EXPENDITURE BY DIVISION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Employee Benefits 71,238$ 71,841$ 74,340$ 74,808$ 74,808$ 4.13% TOTAL 71,238$ 71,841$ 74,340$ 74,808$ 74,808$ 4.13% EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Salaries & Benefits 71,031$ 71,841$ 74,067$ 74,376$ 74,376$ 3.53% Supplies - - - - - N/A Maintenance - - - - - N/A Purchased Services 207 - 273 432 432 N/A Capital Outlay - - - - - N/A TOTAL 71,238$ 71,841$ 74,340$ 74,808$ 74,808$ 4.13% PERSONNEL Revised Approved Approved % Change in Actual Actual Budget Base Budget Budget Budget from FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Employee Benefits 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.00% TOTAL 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.00% 215 City of College Station Workers Compensation Fund Summary FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 % Change in FY10 Revised Year End Approved Approved Budget from Actual Budget Estimate Base Budget Budget FY11 to FY12 Beginning Working Capital, accrual basis of accounting 1,741,901$ 1,895,642$ 1,895,642$ 1,724,322$ 1,724,322$ REVENUES Premiums 775,244$ 420,845$ 386,149$ 794,416$ 794,416$ 88.77% Other Operating Revenues 1,464 1,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 100.00% Investment Earnings 18,639 20,530 10,857 8,622 8,622 -58.00% Reimbursed Expenses - - 20,000 500 500 N/A Total Revenues 795,347$ 442,375$ 419,006$ 805,538$ 805,538$ 82.09% EXPENDITURES AND TRANSFERS Administration 127,070$ 114,353$ 116,858$ 80,660 80,660 -29.46% Professional Services - 14,700 10,500 11,025 11,025 -25.00% Safety Boots - 22,500 22,500 22,500 22,500 0.00% Administration Fee 52,000 96,800 26,000 27,300 27,300 -71.80% Other Operating Expenses 426 - 400 404 404 N/A Claims 305,028 225,000 301,701 288,000 288,000 28.00% Premiums 144,900 181,016 112,367 117,985 117,985 -34.82% Pay Plan - 542 - - - -100.00% Other Transfers - - - 200,000 200,000 N/A Total Operating Expenses & Xfers 629,424$ 654,911$ 590,326$ 747,874$ 747,874$ 14.19% Increase (Decrease) in Working Capital, modified accrual budgetary basis 165,923$ (212,536)$ (171,320)$ 57,664$ 57,664$ Measurement Focus Adjustment (12,182)$ Ending Working Capital, accrual basis of accounting 1,895,642$ 1,683,106$ 1,724,322$ 1,781,986$ 1,781,986$ Premiums 98.68% Other  Operating  Revenues 0.25% Investment  Earnings 1.07% Workers Compensation Fund ‐Sources Admin 10.55% Professional  Services 1.47% Safety Boots  3.01% Admin Fee 3.65% Other  Operating  Expenses 0.05% Claims 38.51% Premiums 15.78%Other  Transfers 26.74% Workers Compensation Fund ‐Uses 216 City of College Station Workers Compensation Fund  Operations & Maintenance Summary EXPENDITURE BY DIVISION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Workers Compensation 127,070$ 151,553$ 149,858$ 114,185$ 114,185$ -24.66% TOTAL 127,070$ 151,553$ 149,858$ 114,185$ 114,185$ -24.66% EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Salaries & Benefits 90,563$ 114,353$ 116,858$ 80,660$ 80,660$ -29.46% Supplies 21,807 22,500 22,500 22,500 22,500 0.00% Maintenance - - - - - N/A Purchased Services 14,700 14,700 10,500 11,025 11,025 -25.00% Capital Outlay - - - - - N/A TOTAL 127,070$ 151,553$ 149,858$ 114,185$ 114,185$ -24.66% PERSONNEL Proposed Approved Approved % Change in Actual Actual Budget Base Budget Budget Budget from FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Workers Compensation 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.00 1.00 -33.33% TOTAL 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.00 1.00 0.00% 217 City of College Station Unemployment Compensation Fund Summary FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 % Change in FY10 Revised Year End Approved Approved Budget from Actual Budget Estimate Base Budget Budget FY11 to FY12 Beginning Working Capital, accrual basis of accounting 207,008$ 234,020$ 234,020$ 208,588$ 208,588$ REVENUES Premiums 55,211$ 32,568$ 32,568$ 28,999$ 28,999$ -10.96% Investment Earnings 1,977 4,188 2,000 1,043 1,043 -75.10% Other Transfers In - - - 200,000 200,000 N/A Total Revenues 57,188$ 36,756$ 34,568$ 230,042$ 230,042$ 525.86% EXPENDITURES Claims 29,240$ 34,330$ 60,000$ 260,600$ 260,600$ 659.10% Total Operating Expenses & Transfers 29,240$ 34,330$ 60,000$ 260,600$ 260,600$ 659.10% Increase (Decrease) in Working Capital, modified accrual budgetary basis 27,948$ 2,426$ (25,432)$ (30,558)$ (30,558)$ Measurement Focus Adjustment (936)$ Ending Working Capital, accrual basis of accounting 234,020$ 236,446$ 208,588$ 178,030$ 178,030$ Premiums 96.53% Unemployment Compensation Fund ‐Sources Unemployment Compensation Fund ‐Uses Investment  Earnings 3.47% Claims 100.00% 218 Equipment Replacement Fund  The Equipment Replacement Fund is an internal service fund that provides equipment and fleet replacements within the City of College Station. In an effort to better control costs, the fund receives rental charges from departments based on the economic life of their equipment and vehicles. The fund then purchases replacements as scheduled and/or as conditions warrant. This fund is prepared on the modified accrual basis where cash transactions are included in the budget presentation in lieu of non-cash transactions such as depreciation. The focus is on the net change in working capital. Specific rental charges are based upon the estimated replacement price of the individual items. Approved replacement policies include the following: 1. All qualified existing fleet equipment will be replaced through the equipment replacement fund. Other equipment will be replaced through the budget process. 2. Each department will be charged an annual replacement fee based on the useful life and anticipated replacement cost of each vehicle assigned to that department. Each year, the fleet superintendent meets with various departments and determines what items need to be replaced and if funds are available to replace needed equipment. The list is then submitted to the Budget Office for inclusion in the annual budget after it has been approved by the director of each department. 3. Each department has been charged for the phone system based on the number of phone lines assigned. Charges for the 800 MHz radio system were charged based on the number of radio units (portable and mobile combined) assigned to the department. 4. Police, Fire, and Emergency Management are charged for Mobile Data Terminals (MDTs). The Information Technology department evaluates the hardware and software required to operate the system each year to determine what hardware may need to be replaced. The anticipated life of the MDT units is approximately five years. 5. Each department will be charged an annual copier replacement rental fee based upon the number of authorized copiers. Each year, the company that has the contract to maintain copiers evaluates each copier and determines which copiers need to be replaced. The list is provided to Fiscal Services and Information Technology representatives who further evaluate the approved replacement list based on funds available. New (additions to the inventory) copiers are funded through individual department’s operating budget. 6. Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) provide temporary battery power to run critical equipment in the event of a power interruption. These units generally serve equipment that supports all departments. The UPS at approved locations are funded from the equipment replacement fund and each department contributes to their replacement and maintenance. 7. Other equipment, not specifically detailed above, will be handled in a similar manner. Representatives of affected departments will be responsible for meeting with Fiscal Services to determine if inclusion in the Equipment Replacement Fund is warranted. The revenues are automatically transferred from departmental budgets on a monthly basis to ensure that sufficient funds will be available to fund expenses related to the specific functions. Budgeted revenues for the fund reflect the Equipment Replacement policies, with the exception of item number three. Due to economic conditions, charges for phone system and radio system replacement have not been included in the fund since FY11. The management restructuring that occurred in FY11 has allowed the City to reduce the number of replacement vehicles that will need to be purchased in FY12. The elimination of 2 parking officer positions in the Police Department allowed one vehicle to be transferred to Fiscal Services for use by the Meter Services division. Additionally, the restructuring of the Parks and Recreation Operations activities allowed a vacated vehicle to replace another PARD vehicle that was eligible for replacement in FY12. These changes will save the city $58,000 in equipment replacement expenditures in FY12. On some vehicle purchases, a trade-in is anticipated and the trade-in value is used to offset the expected cost of the vehicle. A list outlining the vehicles to be replaced is included on the following pages. 219 11/4/2011 14:12 11/4/2011 14:12 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 % Change in FY10 Revised Year-End Approved Approved Budget from Actual Budget Estimate Base Budget Budget FY11 to FY12 REVENUES Fleet Rentals 2,986,632$ 2,987,265$ 2,987,265$ 3,230,844$ 3,230,844$ 8.15% Phone System Rentals 29,930 - - - - N/A Radio System Rentals 63,446 - - - - N/A Mobile Data Terminal Rentals 118,244 62,018 62,018 87,945 87,945 41.81% Mobile Video Camera Systems 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 0.00% Copier Rentals 66,387 66,328 66,328 67,382 67,382 1.59% Uninterruptible Power Supply Rentals 24,875 26,732 26,732 26,755 26,755 0.09% Investment Income 44,440 83,110 45,000 40,000 40,000 -51.87% Certificates of Obligation Income - 1,000,000 - - - -100.00% Transfers In - 1,038,691 2,038,691 - - -100.00% Other Non Operating Revenues 84,315 200,000 200,000 75,000 75,000 -62.50% Total Revenues 3,483,269$ 5,529,144$ 5,491,034$ 3,592,926$ 3,592,926$ -35.02% EXPENDITURES Fleet Purchase & Replacement 3,017,044$ 5,047,895$ 4,747,478$ 3,933,000$ 3,933,000$ -22.09% Copier Replacement 13,345 68,523 68,523 35,445 35,445 -48.27% Mobile Data Terminal Replacement 295,103 66,459 4,075 45,461 45,461 -31.60% Mobile Video Camera Systems 50,103 - - - - N/A Uninterruptible Power Supply Replacement 7,111 31,455 27,380 30,920 30,920 -1.70% Contingency - 40,000 - 40,000 40,000 0.00% Other 1,181,461 - - - - N/A Total Expenditures 4,564,167$ 5,254,332$ 4,847,456$ 4,084,826$ 4,084,826$ -22.26% Increase (Decrease) in Working Capital, modified accrual budgetary basis (1,080,898)$ 274,812$ 643,578$ (491,900)$ (491,900)$ Measurement Focus Adjustment 1,328,512$ City of College Station Equipment Replacement Fund Fund Summary Beginning Working Capital, accrual basis of accounting 5,390,420$ 5,638,034$ 5,638,034$ 6,281,612$ 6,281,612$ Ending Working Capital, accrual basis of accounting 5,638,034$ 5,912,846$ 6,281,612$ 5,789,712$ 5,789,712$ Fleet Rentals 89.9% Mobile Data  Terminal  Rentals 2.4% Mobile Video  Camera  Systems 1.8% Copier Rentals 1.9% UPS Rentals 0.7% Investment  Income 1.1% Other Non  Operating  Revenues 2.1% Equipment Replacement Fund ‐Sources Fleet Purchase  & Replacement 96.3% Copier  Replacement 0.9%MDT  Replacement 1.1% UPS  Replacement 0.8% Contingency 1.0% Equipment Replacement Fund ‐Uses 220 Department Ref #Year Description  Replacement  Cost  Police 4167 2008 Ford Police Interceptor 42,000$ Police 4168 2008 Ford Police Interceptor 42,000 Police 4169 2008 Ford Police Interceptor 42,000 Police 4170 2008 Ford Police Interceptor 42,000 Police 4171 2008 Ford Police Interceptor 42,000 Police 4172 2008 Ford Police Interceptor 42,000 Police 4809 2006 Ford F150 Truck 29,000 Police Department Total 281,000$ Public Works 1910 1999 Ford F250 Truck 35,000$ Public Works 3175 2002 Wirtgen Milling Machine 400,000 Public Works 3109 2003 Ford F250 Truck 29,000 Public Works 3170 1998 Woods D80 Shredder 6,000 Public Works Total 470,000$ Parks and Recreation 8207 2003 Ford E350 Bus 43,000$ Parks and Recreation 8208 2003 Ford E350 Bus 43,000 Parks and Recreation 8318 1998 Trim Trailer 3,000 Parks and Recreation 8322 2001 Ford Crew Cab 1 Ton w/ Utility 40,000 Parks and Recreation 8346 2001 Ford Crew Cab 1 Ton w/ Utility 40,000 Parks and Recreation 8353 2002 Chevrolet Crew Cab 1 Ton 40,000 Parks and Recreation 8365 2006 Toro 4100 33,000 Parks and Recreation 8424 2000 Ford F450 Truck 40,000 Parks and Recreation 8426 2004 Grasshopper Mower 15,000 Parks and Recreation Total 297,000$ General Fund Total 1,048,000$ Electric 9269 2002 Ford F350 Utility Truck 40,000$ Electric Fund Total 40,000$ Water 9424 2003 Ford F350 Crew Cab Truck 40,000 Water Fund Total 40,000$ Wastewater 9529 1995 Ford Flatbed Truck 29,000$ Wastewater 9536 2003 GMC G3500 Van with Camera 210,000 Wastewater 9537 2005 Ford F350 Crew Cab w/ Utility 40,000 Wastewater Fund Total 279,000$ Sanitation 7115 2005 GMC Manual Side Loader 138,000$ Sanitation 7136 2005 Autocar Automated Side Loader 285,000 Sanitation 7137 2005 Autocar Automated Side Loader 285,000 Sanitation 7138 2005 Sterling Rear Loader 222,000 Sanitation 7139 2005 Sterling Rear Loader 222,000 Sanitation 7202 2004 Volvo Roll Off 230,000 Sanitation 7218 2007 Autocar Front Loader 290,000 Sanitation 7219 2007 Autocar Front Loader 290,000 Sanitation 7222 2002 Ford 1/2 Ton Truck 29,000 Sanitation 7228 2004 Autocar Side Loader 285,000 Sanitation Total 2,276,000$ Total Vehicle Replacement Costs (All Funds)3,683,000$ FY12 Approved Fleet Replacement Schedule 221 FY12 Approved New Fleet Purchases Department Description  Replacement  Cost  Fire Ambulance for FS #6 250,000$ Total New Fleet Purchases 250,000$ Total Vehicle Replacement Costs and New Fleet Purchases 3,933,000$ FY12 Approved Copier Replacement Schedule Department Description  Replacement  Cost  Planning & Development Services IR5020/10503760 13,085$ Parks & Recreation IR7200/10504019 22,360 Total Copier Replacement Costs 35,445$ FY12 Approved Mobile Data Terminal (MDT) Replacement Schedule Department Description  Replacement  Cost  Fire Panasonic Toughbook 19 (13)45,461$ Total MDT Replacement Costs 45,461$ 222 Utility Customer Service Fund  The Utility Customer Service Fund is an Internal Service Fund used to account for expenses associated with reading electric and water meters within the city limits of College Station, completing connect and disconnect work requests, and providing Customer Service activities including billing and collections for Electric, Water, Wastewater, Sanitation, and Drainage utilities. For financial statement reporting, Internal Service Funds are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. The Utility Customer Service Fund (Internal Service Fund) is budgeted using the modified accrual basis of accounting and the current financial resources measurement focus. The budget measures the net change in working capital (current assets less current liabilities). The measurement focus adjustment to arrive at Actual 2010 Working Capital is necessary because the (internal service) fund’s working capital results from using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting for financial reporting purposes. Revenues in the Utility Customer Service Fund are received as service charges from the various enterprise funds and the Drainage Fund. Revenues of $2,342,713 are approved for fiscal year 2012. FY12 approved expenses are $2,342,713. One service level adjustment totaling $23,661 was approved in FY12 for the replacement of hand held meters in the Meter Services division. 223 Fund Summary FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 % Change in FY10 Revised Year-End Approved Approved Budget from Actual Bud get Estimate Base Budget Budget FY11 to FY12 BEGINNING WORKING CAPITAL 33,745$ 192,414$ 192,414$ 132,253$ 132,253$ REVENUES & SERVICE CHARGES Service Charges 2,081,929$ 2,037,889$ 2,037,889$ 2,123,302$ 2,146,963$ 5.35% Other Operating Revenues 188,875 220,198 191,900 195,000 195,000 (11.44%) Investment Income 316 416 975 750 750 80.29% Reimbursed Expenses 12,360 - - - - N/A Non Operating 6,894 - - - - N/A Total Revenues 2,290,374$ 2,258,503$ 2,230,764$ 2,319,052$ 2,342,713$ 3.73% Total Funds Available 2,324,119$ 2,450,917$ 2,423,178$ 2,451,305$ 2,474,966$ 0.98% EXPENDITURES Collections* 1,558,114$ 1,642,399$ 1,665,848$ 1,716,676$ 1,716,676$ 4.52% Meter Service* 555,977 618,194 625,077 602,376 626,037 1.27% Contingency - (2,090) - - - (100.00%) Other - 33,000 - - - (100.00%) Total Expenditures 2,114,091$ 2,291,503$ 2,290,925$ 2,319,052$ 2,342,713$ 2.23% Increase/Decrease in Working Capital 176,283$ (33,000)$ (60,161)$ -$ -$ Measurement Focus Adjustment (17,614)$ ENDING WORKING CAPITAL 192,414$ 159,414$ 132,253$ 132,253$ 132,253$ Utility Customer Service Fund City of College Station Utility Customer Service Fund ‐Utility Customer Service Fund ‐Uses * Collections and Meter services make up the Operations & Maintenance portion of the Utility Customer Service Budget. Service  Charges 91.64% Other  Operating  Revenues 8.32% Investment  Income 0.03% Utility Customer Service Fund ‐ Sources Collections* 73.28% Meter  Service* 26.72% Utility Customer Service Fund ‐Uses 224 City of College Station Utility Customer Service Fund Operations & Maintenance Summary EXPENDITURE BY DIVISION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Billing/Collections 1,558,114$ 1,642,399$ 1,665,848$ 1,716,676$ 1,716,676$ 4.52% Meter Services 555,977 618,194 625,077 602,376 626,037 1.27% TOTAL 2,114,091$ 2,260,593$ 2,290,925$ 2,319,052$ 2,342,713$ 3.63% EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Salaries & Benefits 1,316,958$ 1,377,422$ 1,396,583$ 1,409,188$ 1,409,188$ 2.31% Supplies 54,158 60,535 58,033 64,965 88,626 46.40% Maintenance 19,376 24,420 20,220 24,455 24,455 0.14% Purchased Services 719,999 779,668 816,089 820,444 820,444 5.23% Capital Outlay 3,600 18,548 - - - -100.00% TOTAL 2,114,091$ 2,260,593$ 2,290,925$ 2,319,052$ 2,342,713$ 3.63% PERSONNEL Revised Approved Approved % Change in Actual Actual Budget Base Budget Budget Budget from FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Billing Collections 19.00 19.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 -5.26% Meter Services 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 0.00% TOTAL 29.50 29.50 28.50 28.50 28.50 -3.39% Service Level Adjustments One-Time Recurring Total Hand Held Meter Replacement (Meter Services)23,661$ -$ 23,661$ Utility Customer Service SLA Totals 23,661$ -$ 23,661$ 225 FISCAL SERVICES UTILITY CUSTOMER SERVICE Description & Budget Explanation: The Utility Customer Service Division is responsible for connecting and disconnecting water and electric meters reading those meters and provide billing and collection services for the city to all customers of electric, water, sewer, sanitation and drainage services. Program Name: Utility Customer Service Service Level:Provide exceptional customer service to support the delivery of electric, water, sewer, sanitation and drainage services to the citizens of College Station. Performance Measures FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Efficiency -No. of customers per day per walk-up employee. 69 70 70 80 -Annual number of processed bills per employee. 24,266 27,900 -Cost per bill. $4.43 $4.15 $5.35 $5.40 -Percent of bad debt expense annually. 0.40% 1.00% 0.45% 0.45% Output -No. of incoming calls. 85,212 93,000 85,000 85,000 -No. of bills annually. 461,058 530,250 430,000 430,000 -No. of payments. 467,262 540,000 432,000 432,000 -No. of walk-up customers. 51,596 54,000 51,380 68,000 -No. of service orders. 91,097 96,900 91,266 92,000 Program Name: Meter Service Service Level:Provide timely connection and disconnection of electric and water services. Maintain service installations to ensure accurate recording of utility consumption. Obtain accurate and timely readings for all electric and water meters. Performance Measures FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness -Same day service percentage. 99.99% 99.99% 99.99% 99.99% -Read accuracy percentage. 99.97% 99.90% 99.98% 99.95% Efficiency -No. of completed service orders per person. 40,436 44,500 40,500 40,500 -No. of completed routine checks of electric meters per person annually. 1,449 1,800 1,300 1,400 -No. of meters read daily, per person. 471 478 450 450 -Cost per meter read $0.34 $0.33 $0.39 $0.40 Output -No. of service orders completed. 80,872 88,000 81,000 82,000 -No. of meters/readings checked out. 2,898 3,400 2,500 2,500 -No. of theft/tampering incidents discovered. 46 55 65 65 -No. of meters read annually. 708,672 717,000 719,000 720,000 Input -No. of full-time technicians/commercial meter reader. 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 -No. of full-time meter readers 3.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 226 Fleet Maintenance Fund  The Fleet Maintenance Fund is an Internal Service Fund which receives revenue based on expected costs of departmental transportation and uses those funds to pay for maintaining the city’s fleet of vehicles. Internal Service Funds are budgeted using the modified accrual basis of accounting and the current financial resources measurement focus. The budget measures the net change in working capital (current assets less current liabilities) to arrive at Actual 2010 Working Capital. This is necessary because the internal service fund’s working capital results from using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting for financial reporting purposes. Estimates for annual funding levels have been developed using a number of techniques that forecast fleet maintenance costs. Each department with assigned vehicles will be charged an annual maintenance fee to cover inspections and maintenance problems. The revenues are transferred from departmental budgets on a monthly basis to ensure that sufficient funds will be available to fund all expenses related to the specific functions. In FY12, estimated Fleet Maintenance revenues in the Fleet Maintenance Fund are $1,574,210. Total revenues are forecasted to total $1,577,410, which is slightly higher than the FY11 revised budget. The approved appropriations for Fleet Maintenance expenditures in FY12 are $1,659,149. 227 City of College Station Fleet Maintenance Fund Fund Summary FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 % Change in FY10 Revised Year-End Approved Approved Budget from Actual Budget Estimate Base Budget Budget FY11 To FY12 REVENUES Fleet Charges 1,665,602$ 1,574,210$ 1,574,210$ 1,574,210$ 1,574,210$ 0.00% Interest Earnings 3,166 2,022 3,200 3,200 3,200 58.26% Other 407 - - - - N/A Total Revenues 1,669,175$ 1,576,232$ 1,577,410$ 1,577,410$ 1,577,410$ 0.07% EXPENDITURES Parts 106,027$ 145,860$ 146,244$ 99,951 99,951$ -31.47% Fleet Maintenance 1,483,047 1,519,688 1,549,482$ 1,523,989 1,523,989 0.28% Contingency - 20,864 - 15,000 15,000 -28.11% Pay Plan - - - 20,209 20,209 Other 2,657 - - - - N/A Total Expenditures 1,591,731$ 1,686,412$ 1,695,726$ 1,659,149$ 1,659,149$ -1.62% Increase (Decrease) in Working Capital, Modified Accrual Basis of Accounting $ 77,444 $ (110,180) $ (118,316) $ (81,739) $ (81,739) Measurement Focus Adjustment (147)$ Beginning Working Capital, Accrual Basis of Accounting $ 388,532 $ 465,829 $ 465,829 $ 347,513 $ 347,513 Ending Working Capital, Accrual Basis of Accounting $ 465,829 $ 355,649 $ 347,513 $ 265,774 $ 265,774 Fleet Maintenance Fund ‐Sources Fleet Maintenance Fund ‐Uses Fleet Charges 99.80% Interest  Earnings 0.20% Fleet Maintenance Fund Sources Parts 6.10% Fleet  Maintenance 92.99% Contingency 0.92% Fleet Maintenance Fund Uses 228 City of College Station Fleet Maintenance Fund  Operations & Maintenance Summary EXPENDITURE BY DIVISION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Parts 106,027$ 145,860$ 146,244$ 99,951$ 99,951$ -31.47% Administration 1,483,047 1,519,688 1,549,482 1,538,989 1,538,989 1.27% TOTAL 1,589,074$ 1,665,548$ 1,695,726$ 1,638,940$ 1,638,940$ -1.60% EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION Revised Estimated Approved Approved % Change in Actual Budget Year-End Base Budget Budget Budget from FY10 FY11 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Salaries & Benefits 794,620$ 807,848$ 824,844$ 845,610 845,610$ 4.67% Supplies 712,247 688,990 704,227 686,379 686,379 -0.38% Maintenance 14,219 12,382 11,958 13,788 13,788 11.36% Purchased Services 67,988 106,328 104,697 93,163 93,163 -12.38% General Capital - 50,000 50,000 - - N/A TOTAL 1,589,074$ 1,665,548$ 1,695,726$ 1,638,940$ 1,638,940$ -1.60% PERSONNEL Revised Approved Approved % Change in Actual Actual Budget Base Budget Budget Budget from FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY11 to FY12 Parts 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00% Administration 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 0.00% TOTAL 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 0.00% 229 PUBLIC WORKS FLEET Description & Budget Explanation: The Fleet Services Division is responsible for the care and maintenance of all vehicles and equipment in the City fleet. Program Name: Fleet Services Service Level:Provide prompt, reliable maintenance service at cost effective rates. Performance Measures FY 10 FY 11 FY 11 FY12 Actual Approved Estimate Approved Effectiveness -% of satisfaction with service provided 94% 92% 93% 92% -% of rework on work orders 2%3% 3% 3% Efficiency -% of road side assistance within 1 hour.98% 95% 96% 95% -% of PMs completed on time 93% 92% 94% 93% -% of PM turn around within 24 hours 95% 95% 96% 95% Output -No. of vehicles per mechanic.64 60 64 60 -No. of PMs per day- heavy duty 2 222 -No. of PMs per day- light duty 5 454 230 A-1 Budget Ordinances A-2 Budget Ordinances A-3 Budget Ordinances A-4 Budget Ordinances A-5 Budget Ordinances A-6 Budget Ordinances FY2012 SERVICE LEVEL ADJUSTMENT (SLA) RECOMMENDED LISTING One-Time Recurring Net Increase Increase Fund Department Description Cost Cost Total Revenue Total FTE Vehicle GENERAL FUND Police Fit Life Testing - 22,375 22,375 - 22,375 - - TOTAL POLICE - 22,375 22,375 - 22,375 - - SLA Fo Fire Fire Station #6 Ambulance Crew 281,630 578,592 860,222 - 860,222 - - Fire Fire Station #6 Engine Crew 250,790 591,523 842,313 - 842,313 9.00 - Fire Fire Station #6 O&M 106,650 44,370 151,020 - 151,020 - - Fire Station #4 Capital Maintenance 80,000 - 80,000 - 80,000 - - TOTAL FIRE 719,070 1,214,485 1,933,555 - 1,933,555 9.00 - Public Works Facilities - Conference Center A/E Structural Evaluation 25,000 - 25,000 - 25,000 - - TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 25,000 - 25,000 - 25,000 - - SLA Fo PARD Replace Registration / Reservation Software 18,000 25,000 43,000 - 43,000 - - PARD Athletic Fields Maintenance Equipment 22,200 - 22,200 - 22,200 - - PARD Reduction and Relocation of Christmas in the Park - (25,000) (25,000) - (25,000) - - PARD City of College Station 75th Birthday Funding 5,000 - 5,000 - 5,000 - - TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION 45,200 - 45,200 - 45,200 - - Planning & Dev Wellborn Small Area Plan 50,000 - 50,000 - 50,000 - - TOTAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 50,000 - 50,000 - 50,000 - - Mayor / Council One Year Removal of Travel / Training and Professional Srv (14,000) - (14,000) - (14,000) - - City Secretary Codification Maintenance Costs - 13,275 13,275 - 13,275 - - City Auditor Assistant City Auditor 2,196 52,235 54,431 - 54,431 1.00 - TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT (11,804) 65,510 53,706 - 53,706 1.00 - TOTAL GENERAL FUND 827,466 1,302,370 2,129,836 - 2,129,836 10.00 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND ED Economic Development Plan 75,000 - 75,000 - 75,000 - - TOTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND 75,000 - 75,000 - 75,000 - - RECREATION FUND SLA Fo Concessions Eliminate Concessions Cost Center (Temp / Seasonal)- (12,000) (12,000) - (12,000) - - Aquatics Change Programming at Natatorium - (62,629) (62,629) (6,500) (56,129) - - Recreation Discontinue / Reduce Recreation Programming - (92,119) (92,119) (28,625) (63,494) (1.00) - TOTAL RECREATION FUND - (166,748) (166,748) (35,125) (131,623) (1.00) - HOTEL TAX FUND Hotel Tax Texas Pool Council Annual Conference 19,000 - 19,000 - 19,000 - - Hotel Tax CVB Increase for Bush Library - 25,000 25,000 - 25,000 - - Hotel Tax CVB Medical and Biomedical Programs - 30,000 30,000 - 30,000 - - Hotel Tax Veteran's Memorial Funding 25,000 - 25,000 - 25,000 - - TOTAL HOTEL TAX FUND 44,000 55,000 99,000 - 99,000 - - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND Community Dev Reduction in Funding to Project Unity - (5,000) (5,000) - (5,000) - - TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND - (5,000) (5,000) - (5,000) - - NORTHGATE PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND Parking Garage Security Camera Expansion 80,000 - 80,000 - 80,000 - - TOTAL NORTHGATE PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND 80,000 - 80,000 - 80,000 - - ELECTRIC FUND Electric Tree Trimming - Transmission 102,000 - 102,000 - 102,000 - - Electric NERC Certification Pay - 10,000 10,000 - 10,000 - - Electric Goodwill Tree Program - (50,500) (50,500) - (50,500) - - Electric Transformer Maintenance - 50,500 50,500 - 50,500 - - Electric Sun Source Solar Program - (37,500) (37,500) - (37,500) - - Electric Electric Substations General Labor Program - 60,000 60,000 - 60,000 - - Electric Meter Testing - 65,000 65,000 - 65,000 - - Electric Dispatch Center Operating Costs - 14,500 14,500 - 14,500 - - TOTAL ELECTRIC FUND 102,000 112,000 214,000 - 214,000 - - WATER FUND Water Discontinue Fluoridation - (41,480) (41,480) - (41,480) - - Water Eliminate Conservation Rebate Program - (4,000) (4,000) - (4,000) - - TOTAL WATER FUND - (45,480) (45,480) - (45,480) - - WASTEWATER FUND WasteWater Interceptor Cleaning / Evaluation - 132,000 132,000 - 132,000 - - TOTAL WASTEWATER FUND - 132,000 132,000 - 132,000 - - INSURANCE FUNDS SLA Fo Employee Benefits Reimburse Police Department for Fit Life Testing - 22,375 22,375 - 22,375 - - TOTAL INSURANCE FUNDS - 22,375 22,375 - 22,375 - - UTILITY CUSTOMER SERVICE FUND Meter Services Hand Held Meter Replacement 23,661 - 23,661 - 23,661 - - TOTAL UTILITY CUSTOMER SERVICE FUND 23,661 - 23,661 - 23,661 - - TOTAL ALL FUNDS 1,152,127 1,406,517 2,558,644 (35,125) 2,593,769 9.00 - B-1 Service Level Adjustments Personnel List Revised Revised Revisions Approved Budget Budget & SLAs Budget Revised Revised Base Revisions Approved FTE FTE FTE FTE Budget Budget Budget & SLAs Budget FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY12 Police Department Administration Division Police Chief 1.00 1.00 1.00 135,872$ 123,337$ 123,337$ -$ 123,337$ Assistant Chief 3.00 3.00 3.00 285,033 285,033 284,253 - 284,253 Lieutenant 1.00 1.00 1.00 71,540 71,540 71,540 - 71,540 Tech. Svcs. Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 65,116 65,116 65,116 - 65,116 Accreditation Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 55,689 62,000 63,000 - 63,000 Staff Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 38,481 38,481 38,481 - 38,481 Secretary 2.00 2.00 2.00 47,200 53,959 54,517 - 54,517 Total 10.00 10.00 0.00 10.00 698,931$ 699,466$ 700,244$ -$ 700,244$ Uniform Patrol Division Lieutenant 4.00 4.00 4.00 276,335$ 276,335$ 266,074$ -$ 266,074$ Sergeant 12.00 12.00 12.00 729,291 785,291 659,443 - 659,443 Master Officer 18.00 0.00 0.00 952,501 - - - - Senior Officer 13.00 0.00 0.00 593,469 - - - - Police Officer 42.00 72.00 72.00 1,553,359 3,240,329 3,251,206 - 3,251,206 Animal Control Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 39,900 39,900 41,392 - 41,392 Animal Control Officer 3.00 3.00 3.00 78,736 78,736 78,166 - 78,166 Parking Enforcement Officer 2.00 2.00 0.00 30,853 30,853 - - - Police Assistant 0.00 0.00 2.00 - - 60,445 - 60,445 *School Crossing Guard (temp/seasonal)2.50 2.50 2.50 42,106 42,222 42,338 - 42,338 Total 97.50 96.50 0.00 96.50 4,296,550$ 4,493,666$ 4,399,064$ -$ 4,399,064$ Criminal Investigation Division Lieutenant 1.00 1.00 1.00 84,012$ 84,012$ 72,696$ -$ 72,696$ Sergeant 2.00 2.00 2.00 128,334 85,556 133,432 - 133,432 Master Officer 11.00 0.00 0.00 597,683 - - - - Senior Officer 2.00 0.00 0.00 90,394 - - - - Police Officer 0.00 13.00 13.00 - 688,077 664,518 - 664,518 Criminal Intelligence Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 52,706 52,706 54,138 - 54,138 Victim Advocate 1.00 1.00 1.00 52,433 52,433 53,875 - 53,875 Civilian Forensic Tech 0.00 1.00 1.00 - 76,057 47,199 - 47,199 Secretary 1.00 1.00 1.00 22,693 22,693 23,317 - 23,317 Total 19.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 1,028,255$ 1,061,534$ 1,049,175$ -$ 1,049,175$ Recruiting and Training Division Lieutenant 1.00 1.00 1.00 72,812$ 72,812$ 74,069$ -$ 74,069$ Sergeant 1.00 1.00 1.00 67,765 67,765 60,715 - 60,715 Master Officer 2.00 0.00 0.00 111,127 - - - - Police Officer 0.00 2.00 2.00 - 111,127 111,613 - 111,613 Total 4.00 4.00 0.00 4.00 251,704$ 251,704$ 246,397$ -$ 246,397$ Quartermaster Division Quartermaster 1.00 1.00 1.00 27,010$ 27,010$ 29,931$ -$ 29,931$ Total 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 27,010$ 27,010$ 29,931$ -$ 29,931$ Communication/Jail Division Communication Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 72,023$ 72,023$ 71,228$ -$ 71,228$ Communication Supervisor 3.00 3.00 3.00 167,691 167,691 153,379 - 153,379 Sr. Communications Operator 4.00 4.00 4.00 148,983 148,983 146,460 - 146,460 Communications Operator 16.00 16.00 16.00 473,979 473,979 470,112 - 470,112 Detention Officer 7.00 9.00 9.00 199,749 281,117 264,627 - 264,627 Holding Facility Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 39,900 39,900 41,392 - 41,392 Dispatch Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 30,577 30,577 22,692 - 22,692 Total 33.00 35.00 0.00 35.00 1,132,902$ 1,214,270$ 1,169,890$ -$ 1,169,890$ Special Services Division Lieutenant 1.00 1.00 1.00 67,223$ 67,223$ 68,370$ -$ 68,370$ Master Officer 3.00 0.00 0.00 166,732 - - - - Senior Officer 3.00 0.00 0.00 140,035 - - - - Sergeant 1.00 1.00 1.00 65,053 65,053 67,475 - 67,475 Police Officer 0.00 6.00 6.00 - 306,676 333,516 - 333,516 Police Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 27,511 27,511 28,267 - 28,267 Total 9.00 9.00 0.00 9.00 466,554$ 466,463$ 497,628$ -$ 497,628$ Information Services Division Information Services Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 62,489$ 62,489$ 63,564$ -$ 63,564$ Evidence Technician 1.00 2.00 2.00 33,392 78,856 69,264 - 69,264 Records Technician 3.00 3.00 3.00 71,352 71,352 68,806 - 68,806 Sr. Records Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 33,392 33,392 34,632 - 34,632 Police Assistant 2.00 2.00 0.00 59,339 59,339 - - - Total 8.00 9.00 0.00 7.00 259,964$ 305,428$ 236,266$ -$ 236,266$ Police Full Time Total 179.00 182.00 0.00 180.00 8,119,764$ 8,477,319$ 8,286,257$ -$ 8,286,257$ *Temp/Seasonal Total 2.50 2.50 0.00 2.50 42,106$ 42,222$ 42,338$ -$ 42,338$ Police Department Totals 181.50 184.50 0.00 182.50 8,161,870$ 8,519,541$ 8,328,595$ -$ 8,328,595$ Fire Department Fire Administration Fire Chief 1.00 1.00 1.00 134,870$ 134,870$ 134,500$ -$ 134,500$ Planning and Research Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 67,684 67,684 69,514 - 69,514 Staff Assistant 2.00 2.00 2.00 73,250 73,250 74,443 - 74,443 Secretary 1.00 1.00 1.00 25,529 25,529 26,728 - 26,728 Total 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 301,333$ 301,333$ 305,185$ -$ 305,185$ * Temporary / Seasonal Position C-1 Personnel Personnel List Revised Revised Revisions Approved Budget Budget & SLAs Budget Revised Revised Base Revisions Approved FTE FTE FTE FTE Budget Budget Budget & SLAs Budget FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY12 Emergency Management Emergency Management Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 58,124$ 58,124$ 59,704$ -$ 59,704$ Asst. Emergency Management Coordinator 1.00 0.00 0.00 32,871 - - - - Staff Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 31,745 31,745 32,926 - 32,926 Total 3.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 122,740$ 89,869$ 92,630$ -$ 92,630$ Fire Suppression Division Asst. Fire Chief 1.00 1.00 1.00 100,120$ 100,120$ 100,120$ -$ 100,120$ Battalion Chief 3.00 3.00 3.00 238,780 238,780 243,556 - 243,556 Captain 4.00 4.00 4.00 273,378 273,378 281,988 - 281,988 Lieutenant 11.00 11.00 11.00 669,585 669,585 669,612 - 669,612 Apparatus Operator 18.00 18.00 18.00 982,171 982,171 943,160 - 943,160 Firefighter I 29.00 29.00 29.00 1,358,764 1,358,764 1,383,258 - 1,383,258 Firefighter II 8.00 8.00 8.00 320,032 320,032 320,032 - 320,032 Firefighter III 4.00 4.00 9.00 13.00 152,774 152,774 152,772 370,078 522,850 Total 78.00 78.00 9.00 87.00 4,095,604$ 4,095,604$ 4,094,498$ 370,078$ 4,464,576$ Fire Prevention Division Fire Marshal 1.00 1.00 1.00 103,570$ 103,570$ 103,569$ -$ 103,569$ Deputy Fire Marshal 4.00 4.00 4.00 245,091 245,091 252,809 - 252,809 Public Education Officer 1.00 1.00 1.00 58,500 58,500 60,255 - 60,255 Total 6.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 407,161$ 407,161$ 416,633$ -$ 416,633$ EMS Division Fire/EMS Training Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 70,831$ 70,831$ 72,958$ -$ 72,958$ Lieutenant - Fire 3.00 3.00 4.00 177,586 177,586 245,717 - 245,717 Apparatus Operator 6.00 6.00 6.00 323,770 323,770 330,222 - 330,222 Firefighter I 14.00 14.00 16.00 650,138 650,138 754,029 - 754,029 Firefighter II 5.00 14.00 11.00 200,020 688,512 80,008 - 80,008 Firefighter III 1.00 1.00 1.00 38,194 38,194 36,471 359,882 396,353 Total 30.00 39.00 0.00 39.00 1,460,539$ 1,949,031$ 1,519,405$ 359,882$ 1,879,287$ Fire Full Time Total 122.00 130.00 9.00 139.00 6,387,377$ 6,842,998$ 6,428,351$ 729,960$ 7,158,311$ *Temp/Seasonal Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Fire Department Totals 122.00 130.00 9.00 139.00 6,387,377$ 6,842,998$ 6,428,351$ 729,960$ 7,158,311$ Public Works Department Public Works Admin. Division Director of Public Works/Special Projects 1.00 1.00 1.00 129,856$ 129,856$ 121,332$ -$ 121,332$ Asst. Public Works Director***1.00 1.00 0.75 92,494 92,494 67,203 - 67,203 Public Works Analyst***0.00 0.00 0.75 - - 27,281 - 27,281 Customer Service Representative 2.00 2.00 1.00 53,269 53,269 26,979 - 26,979 Total 4.00 4.00 0.00 3.50 275,619$ 275,619$ 242,795$ -$ 242,795$ Traffic Engineering Assistant City Engineer 1.00 1.00 1.00 71,982$ 71,982$ 73,422$ -$ 73,422$ *Public Works Intern 0.50 0.50 0.00 8,089 8,112 - - - *Engineering Intern (temp/seasonal)0.50 0.50 0.00 8,089 8,112 - - - Total 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 88,160$ 88,205$ 73,422$ -$ 73,422$ Facilities Maintenance Division Facility Maint. Superintendent 1.00 1.00 1.00 73,209$ 73,209$ 73,429$ -$ 73,429$ Sr. Facility Maint. Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 50,399 50,399 50,391 - 50,391 Facility Maint. Technician 5.00 5.00 5.00 198,289 198,289 191,405 - 191,405 Total 7.00 7.00 0.00 7.00 321,897$ 321,897$ 315,225$ -$ 315,225$ Capital Projects Assistant Director of Capital Projects 0.00 0.00 1.00 -$ -$ 90,000$ -$ 90,000$ Assistant City Engineer 0.00 0.00 4.00 - - 257,799 - 257,799 Graduate Civil Engineer 0.00 0.00 1.00 - - 60,270 - 60,270 Land Agent 0.00 0.00 1.00 - - 67,000 - 67,000 Assistant Land Agent 0.00 0.00 1.00 - - 39,522 - 39,522 Staff Assistant 0.00 0.00 1.00 - - 38,376 - 38,376 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.00 -$ -$ 552,967$ -$ 552,967$ Streets Maintenance Division Street Superintendent 1.00 1.00 1.00 69,110$ 69,110$ 70,492$ -$ 70,492$ Crew Leader 2.00 2.00 2.00 78,486 78,486 74,251 - 74,251 Equipment Operator 15.00 15.00 13.00 430,699 430,699 373,087 - 373,087 Light Equipment Operator 4.00 1.00 2.00 100,657 25,164 19,957 - 19,957 Total 22.00 19.00 0.00 18.00 678,952$ 603,459$ 537,787$ -$ 537,787$ Drainage Division Foreman 1.00 1.00 0.00 50,495$ 50,495$ -$ -$ -$ Crew Leader 1.00 1.00 0.00 36,041 36,041 - - - Equipment Operator 7.00 8.00 0.00 197,976 195,139 - - - Drainage Inspector 1.00 1.00 0.00 45,823 45,823 - - - GIS Technician 1.00 1.00 0.00 34,769 34,769 - - - Light Equipment Operator 1.00 3.00 0.00 23,673 83,919 - - - Total 12.00 15.00 0.00 0.00 388,777$ 446,186$ -$ -$ -$ Traffic Signs/ Markings Division Signs Technician 3.00 3.00 3.00 105,203$ 105,203$ 95,713$ -$ 95,713$ Total 3.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 105,203$ 105,203$ 95,713$ -$ 95,713$ * Temporary / Seasonal Position C-2 Personnel Personnel List Revised Revised Revisions Approved Budget Budget & SLAs Budget Revised Revised Base Revisions Approved FTE FTE FTE FTE Budget Budget Budget & SLAs Budget FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY12 Irrigation Maintenance Irrigation Specialist 0.00 2.00 2.00 -$ -$ 54,228$ -$ 54,228$ Total 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 -$ -$ 54,228$ -$ 54,228$ Public Works Engineering City Engineer 1.00 0.00 0.00 92,494$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Senior Asst. City Engineer 1.00 0.00 0.00 75,952 - - - - Assistant City Engineer 1.00 0.00 0.00 65,798 - - - - Graduate Civil Engineer 1.00 0.00 0.00 51,642 - - - - Construction Inspector 5.00 0.00 0.00 215,954 - - - - Total 9.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 501,840$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Traffic Signal Systems Traffic Systems Superintendent 1.00 1.00 1.00 73,429$ 73,429$ 73,429$ -$ 73,429$ Traffic Systems Foreman 1.00 1.00 1.00 57,816 57,816 53,269 - 53,269 Traffic Signal Technician 3.00 3.00 4.00 146,646 191,646 160,381 - 160,381 Total 5.00 5.00 0.00 6.00 277,891$ 322,891$ 287,079$ -$ 287,079$ Public Works Full Time Total 63.00 56.00 0.00 49.50 2,622,161$ 2,147,237$ 2,159,216$ -$ 2,159,216$ *Temp/Seasonal Total 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 16,178$ 16,223$ -$ -$ -$ Public Works Department Totals 64.00 57.00 0.00 49.50 2,638,339$ 2,163,460$ 2,159,216$ -$ 2,159,216$ *** Public Works Assistant Director funded from Oct - Jan, PW Analyst funded from Jan - Oct for FY12 Capital Projects Department Director of Capital Projects 1.00 1.00 0.00 115,316$ 115,316$ -$ -$ -$ Assistant Director of Capital Projects 1.00 1.00 0.00 90,247 90,247 - - - Assistant City Engineer 2.00 2.00 0.00 128,860 128,860 - - - Graduate Civil Engineer 3.00 3.00 0.00 174,055 174,055 - - - Land Agent 1.00 1.00 0.00 65,866 65,866 - - - Assistant Land Agent 1.00 1.00 0.00 36,860 36,860 - - - Staff Assistant 1.00 1.00 0.00 38,481 38,481 - - - Total 10.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 649,685$ 649,685$ -$ -$ -$ Capital Projects Department Full Time Total 10.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 649,685$ 649,685$ -$ -$ -$ *Temp/Seasonal Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Capital Projects Department Totals 10.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 649,685$ 649,685$ -$ -$ -$ Parks & Recreation Department Parks & Recreation Administration Division Director of Parks & Rec.1.00 1.00 1.00 126,346$ 126,346$ 113,000$ -$ 113,000$ Asst. Director of Parks & Rec.1.00 1.00 1.00 82,225 82,225 86,100 - 86,100 Sr. Parks Planner 1.00 1.00 1.00 66,439 66,439 67,582 - 67,582 Parks Planner 2.00 2.00 0.00 117,451 117,451 - - - Marketing Coordinator 0.00 0.00 1.00 - - 43,500 - 43,500 Administrative Support Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 44,437 44,437 45,645 - 45,645 Staff Assistant 2.00 2.00 2.00 60,841 60,841 62,774 - 62,774 Secretary 2.00 2.00 2.00 53,289 53,289 53,082 - 53,082 *Secretary (temp/seasonal)0.50 0.50 0.50 1,835 1,840 1,845 - 1,845 Total 10.50 10.50 0.00 9.50 552,863$ 670,319$ 473,528$ -$ 473,528$ Hotel Tax Fund Programs Activity Center Recreation Supervisor 0.00 1.00 1.00 -$ 60,003$ 61,209$ -$ 61,209$ *Special Events Workers (temp/seasonal)0.50 0.50 0.50 9,123 9,148 9,173 - 9,173 Total 0.50 1.50 0.00 1.50 9,123$ 69,151$ 70,382$ -$ 70,382$ Recreation Administration Activity Center Recreation Superintendent 1.00 1.00 1.00 71,914$ 71,914$ 73,151$ -$ 73,151$ Recreation Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 60,079 60,079 61,209 - 61,209 Event Marketing & Development Supervisor 0.00 0.80 0.80 - - 39,038 - 39,038 Assistant Recreation Supervisor - School Age Care 1.00 1.00 1.00 39,775 39,775 41,246 - 41,246 *Custodian (temp/seasonal)0.50 0.50 0.50 3,316 825 827 - 827 Total 3.50 4.30 0.00 4.30 175,084$ 172,593$ 215,471$ -$ 215,471$ Recreation Athletics Activity Center Recreation Supervisor 2.00 0.00 0.00 121,380$ 61,377$ -$ -$ -$ Asst. Recreation Supervisor 1.00 0.00 0.00 41,860 41,860 - - - *Special Events Worker (temp/seasonal)3.00 0.00 0.00 66,576 33,278 - - - Total 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 229,816$ 136,515$ -$ -$ -$ Recreation Concession Activity Center Concession Supervisor 1.00 0.00 0.00 48,151$ -$ -$ -$ -$ *Concession Worker (temp/seasonal)2.00 0.00 0.00 43,495 - - - - Total 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 91,646$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Special Events Activity Center Recreation Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 61,377$ 61,377$ 61,209$ -$ 61,209$ *Recreation Assistant/ Special Events (temp/seasonal) 1.50 1.50 1.50 33,230 28,406 62,908 - 62,908 *Special Events Workers (temp/seasonal)1.00 1.00 1.00 54,356 52,753 41,938 (5,028) 36,910 Total 3.50 3.50 0.00 3.50 148,963$ 142,536$ 166,055$ (5,028)$ 161,027$ Senior Services Activity Center Senior Services Coordinator (PT Regular)0.50 0.00 0.00 25,039$ -$ -$ -$ -$ *Program Assistant (temp/seasonal)0.50 0.00 0.00 9,135 - - - - * Temporary / Seasonal Position C-3 Personnel Personnel List Revised Revised Revisions Approved Budget Budget & SLAs Budget Revised Revised Base Revisions Approved FTE FTE FTE FTE Budget Budget Budget & SLAs Budget FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY12 Total 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34,174$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Instruction Activity Center Recreation Supervisor 1.00 0.00 0.00 61,377$ 61,377$ -$ -$ -$ Asst. Recreation Supervisor 1.00 0.00 0.00 42,068 42,068 - - - *Tennis Leaders (temp/seasonal)0.50 0.00 0.00 16,308 - - - - *Water Safety Instructor (temp/seasonal)4.00 0.00 0.00 65,233 65,412 - - - Total 6.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 184,986$ 168,857$ -$ -$ -$ Hotel Tax Programs - Heritage Programs Heritage Programs Staff Assistant 1.00 1.00 0.50 27,494$ 27,495$ 14,560$ -$ 14,560$ Total 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.50 27,494$ 27,495$ 14,560$ -$ 14,560$ Special Facilities Administration Activity Center Recreation Superintendent 1.00 1.00 1.00 69,615$ 69,615$ 70,813$ -$ 70,813$ Total 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 69,615$ 69,615$ 70,813$ -$ 70,813$ Special Facilities Aquatic Activity Center Pools Supervisor 1.00 0.00 0.00 61,377$ 61,377$ -$ -$ -$ Asst. Pools Supervisor 1.00 0.00 0.00 40,421 40,421 - - - *Pool Manager/ Asst. Manager (temp/seasonal)6.00 0.00 0.00 110,661 110,696 - - - *Lifeguards (temp/seasonal)12.00 0.00 0.00 330,909 332,087 - - - Total 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 543,368$ 544,581$ -$ -$ -$ Special Facilities Conference Center Activity Center Conference Center Supervisor 1.00 0.00 0.00 61,377$ 61,377$ -$ -$ -$ Assist. Conference Center Supervisor 1.00 0.00 0.00 34,831 34,831 - - - Secretary 1.00 0.00 0.00 24,799 24,799 - - - *Part-time Receptionist (temp/seasonal)1.00 0.00 0.00 14,338 14,941 - - - *Building Attendant (temp/seasonal)2.50 0.00 0.00 35,328 34,861 - - - Total 6.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 170,673$ 170,809$ -$ -$ -$ Special Facilities Lincoln Center Activity Center Center Supervisor 1.00 0.00 0.00 60,053$ 60,053$ -$ -$ -$ Center Assistant Supervisor 2.00 0.00 0.00 78,819 78,819 - - - *Recreation Assistant (temp/seasonal)3.50 0.00 0.00 75,944 76,153 - - - Total 6.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 214,816$ 215,025$ -$ -$ -$ Youth Recreation Recreation Supervisor 1.00 0.00 0.00 58,836$ -$ -$ -$ -$ *Teen Center Staff Attendant (temp/seasonal)3.00 0.00 0.00 69,933 - - - - Total 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 128,769$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Operations Administration Activity Center Parks Superintendent 1.00 1.00 0.00 70,480$ 70,480$ -$ -$ -$ Total 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 70,480$ 70,480$ -$ -$ -$ East District Operations Activity Center Parks Operations Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 44,467$ 44,467$ 46,114$ -$ 46,114$ Parks Crew Leader 3.00 3.00 3.00 109,916 109,916 111,842 - 111,842 Light Equipment Operator 4.00 4.00 4.00 109,978 109,978 111,634 - 111,634 Grounds Worker 5.00 4.00 4.00 136,571 115,109 93,122 - 93,122 *Part-time Groundsworker (temp/seasonal)2.00 2.00 2.00 39,425 39,533 26,042 - 26,042 Total 15.00 14.00 0.00 14.00 440,357$ 419,003$ 388,754$ -$ 388,754$ South District Operations Activity Center Parks Operations Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 41,735$ 41,735$ 41,787$ -$ 41,787$ Parks Crew Leader 2.00 2.00 2.00 76,191 76,191 76,752 - 76,752 Light Equipment Operator 2.00 2.00 2.00 54,083 54,083 56,638 - 56,638 Grounds Worker 6.00 5.00 5.00 138,531 117,069 115,856 - 115,856 *Part-time Groundsworker (temp/seasonal)1.00 1.00 1.00 15,022 15,043 20,007 - 20,007 Total 12.00 11.00 0.00 11.00 325,562$ 304,121$ 311,040$ -$ 311,040$ West District Parks Operations Activity Center Parks Operations Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 43,175$ 43,175$ 43,285$ -$ 43,285$ Parks Crew Leader 2.00 1.00 1.00 71,728 71,728 35,776 - 35,776 Light Equipment Operator 2.00 2.00 2.00 55,209 55,209 57,803 - 57,803 Grounds Worker 6.00 4.00 4.00 146,124 124,662 104,749 - 104,749 *Part-time Groundsworker (temp/seasonal)1.00 1.00 1.00 15,015 15,056 15,097 - 15,097 Total 12.00 9.00 0.00 9.00 331,251$ 309,830$ 256,710$ -$ 256,710$ Cemetery Activity Center Cemetery Sexton 1.00 1.00 1.00 43,174$ 43,174$ 44,782$ -$ 44,782$ Cemetery Crew Leader 1.00 1.00 1.00 30,806 30,806 31,949 - 31,949 Groundsworker 3.00 3.00 3.00 69,476 69,476 71,011 - 71,011 Total 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 143,456$ 143,456$ 147,742$ -$ 147,742$ Urban Landscape Activity Center Urban Landscape Manager 1.00 1.00 0.00 76,425$ 76,425$ -$ -$ -$ Urban Landscape Supervisor 1.00 1.00 0.00 49,536 49,536 - - - Horticulture Crew Leader 2.00 2.00 2.00 68,182 68,182 71,469 - 71,469 Urban Landscape Crew Leader 1.00 1.00 1.00 31,911 31,911 33,092 - 33,092 Urban Landscape / Horticulture Worker 6.00 4.00 4.00 161,225 136,968 117,228 - 117,228 Irrigation Specialist 3.00 1.00 1.00 90,040 90,040 28,392 - 28,392 *Urban Landscape / Horticulture Worker (temp/seasonal) 0.50 0.50 0.50 11,763 - - - - Total 14.50 10.50 0.00 8.50 489,082$ 453,062$ 250,181$ -$ 250,181$ * Temporary / Seasonal Position C-4 Personnel Personnel List Revised Revised Revisions Approved Budget Budget & SLAs Budget Revised Revised Base Revisions Approved FTE FTE FTE FTE Budget Budget Budget & SLAs Budget FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY12 Parks & Recreation Full Time Total 86.50 63.80 0.00 59.30 3,360,633$ 3,257,416$ 2,187,399$ -$ 2,187,399$ *Temp/Seasonal Total 46.50 8.50 0.00 8.50 1,020,945$ 830,032$ 177,837$ (5,028)$ 172,809$ Parks & Recreation Department Totals 133.00 72.30 0.00 67.80 4,381,578$ 4,087,448$ 2,365,236$ (5,028)$ 2,360,208$ Planning & Development Services Department Administration Executive Director of Development Services 1.00 1.00 1.00 117,321$ 117,321$ 122,850$ -$ 122,850$ Asst. Dir. Planning & Development Services 2.00 2.00 2.00 182,741 182,741 184,986 - 184,986 Community Development Manager 0.00 0.00 1.00 - - 70,989 - 70,989 Total 3.00 3.00 0.00 4.00 300,062$ 300,062$ 378,825$ -$ 378,825$ Engineering City Engineer 0.00 1.00 1.00 -$ 92,494$ 92,494$ - 92,494$ Senior Asst. City Engineer 0.00 1.00 1.00 - 75,952 75,951 - 75,951 Assistant City Engineer 0.00 1.00 1.00 - 65,798 67,113 - 67,113 Graduate Civil Engineer 0.00 1.00 1.00 - 51,642 53,191 - 53,191 Construction Inspector 0.00 5.00 5.00 - 215,954 211,094 - 211,094 Total 0.00 9.00 0.00 9.00 -$ 501,840$ 499,843$ - 499,843$ Building Inspection Building Official 1.00 1.00 1.00 76,957$ 76,957$ 76,957$ -$ 76,957$ Plans Examiner 2.00 2.00 2.00 98,904 98,904 100,782 - 100,782 Combination Building Inspector 4.00 4.00 4.00 143,788 143,788 150,920 - 150,920 Total 7.00 7.00 0.00 7.00 319,649$ 319,649$ 328,659$ -$ 328,659$ Development Coordination Development Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 68,916$ 68,916$ 70,294$ -$ 70,294$ Staff Assistant 5.00 4.00 4.50 160,119 128,937 155,627 - 155,627 Administrative Support Specialist 0.00 1.00 1.00 - 34,289 35,666 - 35,666 CSR/Permit Technician 0.00 1.00 2.00 - 28,574 59,401 - 59,401 Customer Service Representative 3.00 2.00 1.00 79,278 49,201 24,966 - 24,966 Total 9.00 9.00 0.00 9.50 308,313$ 309,917$ 345,954$ -$ 345,954$ Code Enforcement Code Enforcement Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 46,887$ 46,887$ 47,824$ -$ 47,824$ Code Enforcement Officer 6.00 5.00 4.00 190,425 160,391 132,755 - 132,755 Total 7.00 6.00 0.00 5.00 237,312$ 207,278$ 180,579$ -$ 180,579$ Planning Division Planning Administrator 1.00 1.00 0.00 75,438$ 75,438$ -$ -$ -$ Sr. Planner 2.00 3.00 4.00 120,068 120,068 223,449 - 223,449 Staff Planner 4.00 3.00 2.00 182,901 182,901 91,037 - 91,037 Planning Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 28,538 28,538 35,457 - 35,457 *Development Review-Intern (temp/seasonal)0.50 0.25 0.50 11,565 1,597 1,601 - 1,601 Total 8.50 8.25 0.00 7.50 418,510$ 408,542$ 351,544$ -$ 351,544$ Neighborhood Services Neighborhood & Community Relations Coord.1.00 1.00 1.00 49,467$ 49,467$ 50,951$ -$ 50,951$ *Neighborhood Intern (temp/seasonal)0.00 0.00 0.00 - - - - - Total 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 49,467$ 49,467$ 50,951$ -$ 50,951$ Transportation Transportation Planning Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 69,704$ 69,716$ 71,110$ -$ 71,110$ Total 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 69,704$ 69,716$ 71,110$ -$ 71,110$ Greenways Greenways Program Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 57,467$ 57,467$ 58,616$ -$ 58,616$ Total 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 57,467$ 57,467$ 58,616$ -$ 58,616$ Geographic Information Services GIS Technician 2.00 2.00 1.00 70,351$ 57,467$ 34,946$ -$ 34,946$ *GIS Intern 0.00 0.25 0.00 - 20,000 - - - Total 2.00 2.25 0.00 1.00 70,351$ 77,467$ 34,946$ -$ 34,946$ Planning & Development Services Full Time Total 39.00 47.00 0.00 45.50 1,819,270$ 2,279,808$ 2,299,426$ -$ 2,299,426$ *Temp/Seasonal Total 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.50 11,565$ 21,597$ 1,601$ -$ 1,601$ Planning & Development Services Dept. Totals 39.50 47.50 0.00 46.00 1,830,835$ 2,301,405$ 2,301,027$ -$ 2,301,027$ Information Technology IT Administration Division Director of Information Technology 1.00 1.00 1.00 108,297$ 108,297$ 108,297$ -$ 108,297$ Asst. Director of Information Technology 1.00 1.00 1.00 82,420 82,420 82,420 - 82,420 IT Support Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 50,391 50,391 50,391 - 50,391 IT Support Representative 2.00 2.00 2.00 59,402 59,402 61,612 - 61,612 Total 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 300,510$ 300,510$ 302,720$ -$ 302,720$ E-Government E-Government Coordinator 1.00 0.00 0.00 56,419$ -$ -$ -$ -$ E-Government Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 33,976 33,976 35,165 - 35,165 Total 2.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 90,395$ 33,976$ 35,165$ -$ 35,165$ Geographic Information Services GIS Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 61,669$ 61,669$ 62,902$ -$ 62,902$ * Temporary / Seasonal Position C-5 Personnel Personnel List Revised Revised Revisions Approved Budget Budget & SLAs Budget Revised Revised Base Revisions Approved FTE FTE FTE FTE Budget Budget Budget & SLAs Budget FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY12 GIS Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 37,751 37,751 38,002 - 38,002 *GIS Intern (temp/seasonal)0.50 0.50 0.25 17,927 17,976 11,716 - 11,716 Total 2.50 2.50 0.00 2.25 117,347$ 117,396$ 112,620$ -$ 112,620$ Mail Postal Clerk (Part time regular)0.75 0.75 0.75 17,207$ 17,207$ 17,160$ -$ 17,160$ Mail Clerk (Part time regular)1.00 1.00 0.50 24,830 24,830 13,536 - 13,536 Total 1.75 1.75 0.00 1.25 42,037$ 42,037$ 30,696$ -$ 30,696$ Management Information Systems Division Business Systems Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 65,801$ 65,801$ 66,788$ -$ 66,788$ Systems Analyst 6.00 6.00 5.00 357,721 357,721 301,092 - 301,092 Network Systems Analyst 2.00 2.00 2.00 129,398 129,398 130,232 - 130,232 Network Systems Administrator 1.00 1.00 1.00 50,391 50,391 50,391 50,391 MicroComputer Coord.1.00 1.00 1.00 59,359 59,359 61,132 - 61,132 MicroComputer Specialist 5.00 5.00 5.00 168,379 210,114 212,888 - 212,888 Total 16.00 16.00 0.00 15.00 831,049$ 872,784$ 822,523$ -$ 822,523$ Communication Services Division Communication Services Coord.1.00 1.00 1.00 56,690$ 56,690$ 49,431$ -$ 49,431$ Sr. Communications Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 49,077 49,077 51,037 - 51,037 Communications Technician 4.00 4.00 4.00 166,335 166,335 167,149 - 167,149 Total 6.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 272,102$ 272,102$ 267,617$ -$ 267,617$ Information Technology Full Time Total 32.75 31.75 0.00 30.25 1,635,513$ 1,620,829$ 1,559,625$ -$ 1,559,625$ *Temp/Seasonal Total 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.25 17,927$ 17,976$ 11,716$ -$ 11,716$ Information Technology Department Totals 33.25 32.25 0.00 30.50 1,653,440$ 1,638,805$ 1,571,341$ -$ 1,571,341$ Fiscal Services Department Fiscal Administration Division Executive Director of Business Services 1.00 1.00 1.00 115,316$ 115,316$ 122,850$ -$ 122,850$ Treasurer 1.00 1.00 1.00 58,400 58,400 59,276 - 59,276 Staff Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 31,160 31,160 29,012 - 29,012 Secretary 1.00 1.00 0.00 26,322 26,322 - - - *Quality Document Reader (temp/seasonal)0.50 0.00 0.00 10,000 - - - - Total 4.50 4.00 0.00 3.00 241,198$ 231,198$ 211,138$ -$ 211,138$ Accounting Division Asst. Fiscal Services Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 77,044$ 77,044$ 79,740$ -$ 79,740$ Staff Accountant 2.00 2.00 2.00 101,784 101,784 102,328 - 102,328 Acct. Customer Service Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 49,674 49,674 51,164 - 51,164 Payroll Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 38,481 38,481 38,481 - 38,481 Accounting Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 35,457 35,457 36,875 - 36,875 Payment Compliance Rep.1.00 0.00 0.00 33,997 - - - - Acct. Customer Service Rep.2.00 2.00 2.00 49,389 49,389 51,371 - 51,371 Total 9.00 8.00 0.00 8.00 385,826$ 351,829$ 359,959$ -$ 359,959$ Purchasing Division Asst. Fiscal Services Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 81,235$ 81,235$ 81,235$ -$ 81,235$ Buyer 2.00 2.00 2.00 111,231 111,231 112,780 - 112,780 Assistant Buyer 1.00 1.00 1.00 33,705 33,705 34,039 - 34,039 Total 4.00 4.00 0.00 4.00 226,171$ 226,171$ 228,054$ -$ 228,054$ Office of Budget & Strategic Planning Budget & Strategic Planning Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 64,195$ 64,195$ 65,157$ -$ 65,157$ Budget & Management Analyst 4.00 4.00 4.00 211,612 211,612 215,511 - 215,511 Total 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 275,807$ 275,807$ 280,668$ -$ 280,668$ Municipal Court Division Municipal Court Administrator 1.00 1.00 1.00 73,239$ 73,239$ 73,239$ -$ 73,239$ Court Operations Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 54,406 54,406 56,038 - 56,038 Collections Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 43,174 43,174 44,905 - 44,905 Customer Service Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 33,914 33,914 35,269 - 35,269 Asst. Collections Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 34,060 34,060 35,248 - 35,248 Docket Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 30,723 30,723 31,807 - 31,807 Payment Compliance Representative 2.00 2.00 2.00 55,146 55,146 57,503 - 57,503 Deputy Court Clerk 6.00 6.00 6.00 150,273 150,273 156,574 - 156,574 City Marshal 1.00 1.00 1.00 57,733 57,733 51,100 - 51,100 Deputy City Marshal 1.00 1.00 2.00 47,241 47,241 91,134 - 91,134 *Court Customer Service Rep. (temp/seasonal)0.50 0.00 0.00 10,083 - - - - Total 16.50 16.00 0.00 17.00 589,992$ 579,909$ 632,817$ -$ 632,817$ Municipal Court Judges Division Municipal Court Judge 1.00 1.00 1.00 99,597$ 99,597$ 99,597$ -$ 99,597$ *Part-time Municipal Court Judge (temp/seasonal)0.50 0.50 0.50 10,175 6,195 6,212 - 6,212 Total 1.50 1.50 0.00 1.50 109,772$ 105,792$ 105,809$ -$ 105,809$ Fiscal Services Full Time Total 39.00 38.00 0.00 38.00 1,798,508$ 1,764,511$ 1,812,233$ -$ 1,812,233$ *Temp/Seasonal Total 1.50 0.50 0.00 0.50 30,258$ 6,195$ 6,212$ -$ 6,212$ Fiscal Services Department Totals 40.50 38.50 0.00 38.50 1,828,766$ 1,770,706$ 1,818,445$ -$ 1,818,445$ General Government City Secretary Division City Secretary 1.00 1.00 1.00 77,445$ 77,445$ 77,713$ -$ 77,713$ * Temporary / Seasonal Position C-6 Personnel Personnel List Revised Revised Revisions Approved Budget Budget & SLAs Budget Revised Revised Base Revisions Approved FTE FTE FTE FTE Budget Budget Budget & SLAs Budget FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY12 Deputy City Secretary 1.00 1.00 1.00 39,733 39,733 40,922 - 40,922 Council Administrative Services Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 32,224 32,224 33,517 - 33,517 Deputy Local Registrar 1.00 1.00 1.00 28,887 28,887 30,264 - 30,264 Secretary 1.00 1.00 1.00 27,135 27,135 24,966 - 24,966 Total 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 205,425$ 205,425$ 207,382$ -$ 207,382$ Internal Audit Division Internal Auditor 1.00 1.00 1.00 79,779$ 79,779$ 79,779$ -$ 79,779$ Internal Auditor Assistant 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 - - - 45,000 45,000 Total 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 79,779$ -$ 79,779$ 45,000$ 124,779$ City Manager Division City Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 172,927$ 172,927$ 165,453$ -$ 165,453$ Deputy City Manager 0.00 0.00 2.00 - - 287,794 - 287,794 Assistant City Manager 2.00 2.00 0.00 289,500 289,500 - - - Assistant to CM 1.00 1.00 1.00 46,739 46,739 50,137 - 50,137 Executive Assistant to the City Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 43,133 43,133 44,864 - 44,864 Economic Devopment Analyst 0.00 0.00 1.00 - - 44,902 - 44,902 *Internship (temp/seasonal)0.50 0.50 0.00 9,386 - - - - Total 5.50 5.50 0.00 6.00 561,684$ 552,298$ 593,150$ -$ 593,150$ Legal Division City Attorney 1.00 1.00 1.00 142,350$ 142,350$ 137,877$ -$ 137,877$ First Asst. City Attorney 2.00 2.00 1.00 236,100 236,100 117,296 - 117,296 Senior Asst. City Attorney 1.00 1.00 1.00 62,217 62,217 72,189 - 72,189 Asst. City Attorney 2.00 1.00 2.00 118,185 62,518 106,372 - 106,372 Legal Assistant/Office Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 48,910 48,910 49,390 - 49,390 Legal Assistant 2.00 2.00 2.00 75,086 75,086 77,004 - 77,004 Legal Secretary 1.00 1.00 1.00 27,406 27,406 29,012 - 29,012 Total 10.00 9.00 0.00 9.00 710,254$ 654,586$ 589,140$ -$ 589,140$ Economic Development Division Director of Economic Dev.1.00 1.00 0.00 113,801$ 113,801$ -$ -$ -$ Asst. Dir. Economic and Community Dev 1.00 1.00 0.00 68,860 68,860 - - - Economic Development Analyst 3.00 3.00 0.00 133,629 133,629 - - - Staff Assistant 0.50 0.50 0.00 27,992 27,992 - - - *Economic Development Specialist 1.50 1.00 0.00 35,447 22,211 - - - Total 7.00 6.50 0.00 0.00 379,729$ 366,493$ -$ -$ -$ Public Communications Public Communications Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 97,768$ 97,768$ 103,283$ -$ 103,283$ Communications & Marketing Specialist 1.00 1.00 1.00 70,365 70,000 73,642 - 73,642 Broadcast Media Specialist 2.00 2.00 2.00 112,665 112,665 114,394 - 114,394 Multi-Media Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 55,007 55,007 56,657 - 56,657 Public Communications Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 23,000 33,100 - 33,100 *College Intern 0.50 0.50 0.00 11,138 8,681 - - - Total 6.50 6.50 0.00 6.00 346,943$ 367,121$ 381,076$ -$ 381,076$ Human Resources Division Human Resources Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 113,609$ 113,609$ 110,302$ -$ 110,302$ Human Resources Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 52,242 52,242 53,810 - 53,810 Human Resources Advisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 49,441 50,639 - 50,639 Recruiter 1.00 1.00 1.00 53,707 53,707 43,026 - 43,026 Staff Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 33,809 33,809 34,831 - 34,831 Secretary 1.00 1.00 1.00 27,511 27,511 27,510 - 27,510 Total 6.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 367,665$ 330,319$ 320,118$ -$ 320,118$ General Government Full Time Total 38.50 37.50 1.00 34.00 2,595,508$ 2,445,351$ 2,170,645$ 45,000$ 2,215,645$ *Temp/Seasonal Total 2.50 2.00 0.00 0.00 55,970 30,892$ -$ -$ -$ General Government Department Totals 41.00 39.50 1.00 34.00 2,651,478$ 2,476,243$ 2,170,645$ 45,000$ 2,215,645$ General Fund Position Totals Full Time Total 609.75 596.05 10.00 575.55 28,988,417$ 29,485,152$ 26,903,152$ 774,960$ 27,678,112$ *Temp/Seasonal Total 55.00 15.50 0.00 12.25 1,194,949$ 965,137$ 239,704$ (5,028)$ 234,676$ GENERAL FUND TOTALS 664.75 611.55 10.00 587.80 30,183,367$ 30,450,289$ 27,142,856$ 769,932$ 27,912,788$ Court Security Division Deputy City Marshal 2.00 2.00 1.00 85,535$ 85,535$ 41,205$ -$ 41,205$ Bailiff 0.50 0.00 0.00 28,950 - - - - Total 2.50 2.00 0.00 1.00 114,484$ 85,535$ 41,205$ -$ 41,205$ Court Security Fee Fund Position Totals Full Time Total 2.50 2.00 0.00 1.00 114,484$ 85,535$ 41,205$ -$ 41,205$ *Temp/Seasonal Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ COURT SECURITY FEE FUND TOTALS 2.50 2.00 0.00 1.00 114,484$ 85,535$ 41,205$ -$ 41,205$ Juvenile Case Manager Division Juvenile Case Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 34,039$ 34,039$ 35,394$ -$ 35,394$ Community Programs Assistant 0.75 0.75 0.75 38,481 38,481 28,861 - 28,861 Total 1.75 1.75 0.00 1.75 72,520$ 72,520$ 64,255$ -$ 64,255$ Juvenile Case Manager Fee Fund Position Totals Full Time Total 1.75 1.75 0.00 1.75 72,520$ 72,520$ 64,255$ -$ 64,255$ *Temp/Seasonal Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ * Temporary / Seasonal Position C-7 Personnel Personnel List Revised Revised Revisions Approved Budget Budget & SLAs Budget Revised Revised Base Revisions Approved FTE FTE FTE FTE Budget Budget Budget & SLAs Budget FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY12 JUVENILE CASE MANAGER FEE FUND TOTALS 1.75 1.75 0.00 1.75 72,520$ 72,520$ 64,255$ -$ 64,255$ Recreation Fund Recreation - Supervisor 0.00 1.00 1.00 121,380$ 61,377$ 61,377$ -$ 61,377$ Recreation - Asst. Supervisor 0.00 1.00 -1.00 0.00 41,860 41,860 42,069 (42,069) - Concessions - Supervisor 0.00 0.20 0.20 - 48,151 39,291 - 39,291 Senior Services Coord. (PT Regular)0.00 0.50 0.50 - 25,039 25,790 25,790 Aquatics - Pools Supervisor 0.00 1.00 1.00 - - 61,377 - 61,377 Aquatics - Asst. Pools Supervisor 0.00 1.00 1.00 - - 42,048 - 42,048 Instruction - Recreation Supervisor 0.00 1.00 1.00 - - 61,377 - 61,377 Instruction - Asst. Recreation Supervisor 0.00 1.00 1.00 - - 42,069 - 42,069 SW Center (Teen) - Rec. Supervisor 0.00 1.00 1.00 - 25,039 60,602 - 60,602 Lincoln Center - Supervisor 0.00 1.00 1.00 - - 61,377 - 61,377 Lincoln Center - Assistant Supervisor 0.00 2.00 1.00 - - 21,035 - 21,035 Conference Center - Supervisor 0.00 1.00 1.00 - - 61,377 - 61,377 Conference Center - Asst. Supervisor 0.00 1.00 1.00 - - 34,831 - 34,831 Conference Center - Secretary 0.00 1.00 1.00 - - 26,030 - 26,030 *Temp / Seasonal 0.00 38.00 38.00 66,576 142,088 759,899 (11,012) 748,887 Total 0.00 51.70 -1.00 49.70 229,816$ 343,554$ 1,400,549$ (53,081)$ 1,347,468$ Recreation Fund Totals Full Time Total 0.00 13.70 -1.00 11.70 -$ 201,466$ 640,650$ (42,069)$ 598,581$ *Temp/Seasonal Total 0.00 38.00 0.00 38.00 66,576$ 142,088$ 759,899$ (11,012)$ 748,887$ RECREATION FUND TOTALS 0.00 51.70 -1.00 49.70 229,816$ 343,554$ 1,400,549$ (53,081)$ 1,347,468$ American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) Division Sustainability Coordinator**1.00 1.00 1.00 -$ 46,359$ 47,793$ -$ 47,793$ Total 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 -$ 46,359$ 47,793$ -$ 47,793$ American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) Fund Totals Full Time Total 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 -$ 46,359$ 47,793$ -$ 47,793$ *Temp/Seasonal Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ ARRA FUND TOTALS 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 -$ 46,359$ 47,793$ -$ 47,793$ ** Sustainability Coordinator funded from FY10 - FY12. Traffic Safety Fund Traffic Signal Technician 1.00 0.00 0.00 39,316$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 39,316$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Traffic Safety Fund Totals Full Time Total 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 39,316$ -$ -$ -$ -$ *Temp/Seasonal Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND TOTALS 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 39,316$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Community Development Division CD Housing Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 46,303$ 45,616$ 42,788$ -$ 42,788$ Community Development Analyst 2.00 2.00 2.00 91,918 89,884 93,275 93,275 Staff Assistant 0.50 0.50 0.50 24,048 24,048 23,983 - 23,983 CD Project Specialist 1.00 1.00 1.00 23,350 42,224 23,349 (7,063) 16,286 Total 4.50 4.50 0.00 4.50 185,619$ 201,772$ 183,395$ (7,063)$ 176,332$ Community Development Fund Position Totals Full Time Total 4.50 4.50 0.00 4.50 185,619$ 201,772$ 183,395$ (7,063)$ 176,332$ *Temp/Seasonal Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND TOTALS 4.50 4.50 0.00 4.50 185,619$ 201,772$ 183,395$ (7,063)$ 176,332$ Northgate Parking Enterprise Fund District Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 44,014$ 44,014$ 45,334$ -$ 45,334$ District Sr. Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 33,809 33,809 34,654 - 34,654 District Coordinator 2.00 2.00 2.00 39,865 39,865 51,913 - 51,913 *District Specialist (temp/seasonal)4.00 4.00 4.00 101,004 101,281 101,559 - 101,559 Total 8.00 8.00 0.00 8.00 218,692$ 218,969$ 233,460$ -$ 233,460$ Northgate Parking Enterprise Fund Position Totals Full Time Total 4.00 4.00 0.00 4.00 117,688$ 117,688$ 131,901$ -$ 131,901$ *Temp/Seasonal Total 4.00 4.00 0.00 4.00 101,004$ 101,281$ 101,559$ -$ 101,559$ NORTHGATE PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND TOTALS 8.00 8.00 0.00 8.00 218,692$ 218,969$ 233,460$ -$ 233,460$ Electric Fund Operations Administration Division Warehouse Operations Activity Center Warehouse Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 58,004$ 58,004$ 60,319$ -$ 60,319$ Warehouse Assistant 3.00 3.00 3.00 99,804 99,804 105,912 - 105,912 *Warehouse Clerk (temp/seasonal)0.50 0.50 0.50 6,457 6,475 6,493 - 6,493 *Facility Attendant (temp/seasonal)0.50 0.50 0.00 6,457 6,475 - - - Total 5.00 5.00 0.00 4.50 170,722$ 170,758$ 172,724$ -$ 172,724$ Administration Activity Center Utilities Admin. Mgr.1.00 1.00 1.00 76,211$ 76,211$ 77,735$ -$ 77,735$ Electric Complianace/Records Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 51,278 51,278 52,817 - 52,817 Customer Service Rep 1.00 1.00 1.00 30,285 30,285 30,576 - 30,576 Secretary 2.00 2.00 2.00 52,602 52,602 54,854 - 54,854 *PUD Intern (temp/seasonal)0.50 0.50 0.00 7,088 7,108 - - - Total 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.00 217,464$ 217,484$ 215,982$ -$ 215,982$ * Temporary / Seasonal Position C-8 Personnel Personnel List Revised Revised Revisions Approved Budget Budget & SLAs Budget Revised Revised Base Revisions Approved FTE FTE FTE FTE Budget Budget Budget & SLAs Budget FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY12 Operations Adm. Division Totals 10.50 10.50 0.00 9.50 388,186$ 388,242$ 388,706$ -$ 388,706$ Electrical Transmission & Distribution Division Director of Electric Utility 1.00 1.00 1.00 136,875$ 136,875$ 136,875$ -$ 136,875$ Assistant Director of Electric Utility 1.00 1.00 1.00 110,553 110,553 110,553 - 110,553 Elect Trans/Dist Foreman 6.00 6.00 6.00 316,097 316,097 367,992 - 367,992 Elect Trans/Dist Supervisor 3.00 3.00 3.00 196,262 196,262 201,882 - 201,882 Electric Projects Coordinator 4.00 4.00 4.00 206,924 206,924 207,465 - 207,465 *Electric Utility Asst (temp/seasonal) 1.00 1.00 1.00 9,162 9,187 9,212 - 9,212 Electrical Inspector Lead 1.00 1.00 1.00 51,329 51,329 52,748 - 52,748 Electrical Meters Technician 3.00 3.00 3.00 294,670 294,670 164,750 - 164,750 Elec. Sub/ Metering Superintendent 1.00 1.00 1.00 69,725 69,725 71,110 - 71,110 Electrical Substation Technician 3.00 3.00 3.00 294,670 294,670 154,947 - 154,947 Electrical Systems Operator 4.00 4.00 4.00 172,885 172,885 188,193 - 188,193 Electrical Trans/Dist Superintendent 1.00 1.00 1.00 85,234 85,234 86,938 - 86,938 Energy Auditor 1.00 1.00 1.00 52,769 52,769 54,875 - 52,769 Energy Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 66,181 66,181 68,167 - 68,167 Key Accounts Rep 1.00 1.00 1.00 36,141 36,141 56,544 - 56,544 Line Locator 1.00 1.00 1.00 37,543 37,543 38,627 - 38,627 Line Technician 13.00 13.00 13.00 557,178 557,178 592,320 - 592,320 Metering Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 127,450 127,450 65,584 - 65,584 SCADA System Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 71,436 71,436 72,666 - 72,666 SCADA Systems Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 57,169 57,169 46,240 - 46,240 Substation Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 127,450 127,450 65,689 - 65,689 Utility Dispatch Operator 4.00 4.00 4.00 156,512 156,512 160,808 - 160,808 Utility Dispatch Ops Supervisor 2.00 2.00 2.00 101,574 101,574 98,821 - 98,821 Utility Dispatch Ops Superint.1.00 1.00 1.00 79,720 79,720 80,000 - 80,000 Work Order/Prop. Rec. Coord.1.00 1.00 1.00 50,203 50,203 51,913 - 51,913 Total 58.00 58.00 0.00 58.00 3,465,711$ 3,465,736$ 3,204,919$ -$ 3,204,919$ Full Time Total 66.00 66.00 0.00 66.00 3,824,734$ 3,824,734$ 3,577,920$ -$ 3,577,920$ *Temp/Seasonal Total 2.50 2.50 0.00 1.50 29,164$ 29,245$ 15,705$ -$ 15,705$ ELECTRIC FUND TOTALS 68.50 68.50 0.00 67.50 3,853,897$ 3,853,979$ 3,593,625$ -$ 3,593,625$ Water Fund Water Production Activity Center Water Production Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 51,851$ 51,851$ 42,319$ -$ 42,319$ Lead Water Production Operator 1.00 1.00 1.00 36,625 36,625 36,625 - 36,625 Water Production Operator 3.00 3.00 3.00 102,283 102,283 104,369 - 104,369 Total 5.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 190,759$ 190,759$ 183,313$ -$ 183,313$ Water Distribution Activity Center Director of Water/Wastewater Utility 1.00 1.00 1.00 116,820$ 116,820$ 116,820$ -$ 116,820$ Regulatory Compliance Assistant 0.00 0.50 0.00 - 42,875 - - - Field Operations Superintendent 1.00 1.00 1.00 70,155 70,155 71,557 - 71,557 Water Services Program Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 59,376 59,376 61,157 - 61,157 Graduate Civil Engineer 1.00 1.00 1.00 56,293 56,293 57,978 - 57,978 Mainatenance Supervisor 2.00 2.00 2.00 100,573 100,573 103,576 - 103,576 GIS Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 48,701 48,701 50,162 - 50,162 Water Auditor 1.00 1.00 0.00 37,126 37,126 - - - Crew Leader 6.00 6.00 6.00 220,668 220,668 221,127 - 221,127 Environmental Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 36,041 36,041 37,480 - 37,480 W/WW Systems Operator 8.00 8.00 8.00 241,129 241,129 239,982 239,982 *Part-time Environmental Technician (temp/seasonal)0.50 0.50 0.50 5,170 5,185 5,199 - 5,199 *Part-time GIS Technician (temp/seasonal)0.50 0.50 0.50 5,170 5,185 5,199 - 5,199 Total 24.00 24.50 0.00 23.00 997,222$ 1,040,126$ 970,237$ -$ 970,237$ Water Fund Position Totals Full Time Total 28.00 28.50 0.00 27.00 1,177,641$ 1,220,516$ 1,143,152$ -$ 1,143,152$ *Temp/Seasonal Total 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 10,340$ 10,369$ 10,398$ -$ 10,398$ WATER FUND TOTALS 29.00 29.50 0.00 28.00 1,187,981$ 1,230,885$ 1,153,550$ -$ 1,153,550$ Wastewater Fund Wastewater Collection Activity Center Asst Director of Water/Wastewater Utility 1.00 1.00 1.00 80,896$ 80,896$ 80,896$ -$ 80,896$ Environmental Compliance Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 73,423 73,423 73,429 - 73,429 Utilities Analyst 1.00 1.00 0.00 49,100 49,100 - - - Lead Environmental Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 45,030 45,030 45,823 - 45,823 Environmental Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 36,041 36,041 36,229 - 36,229 Asset System Administrator 1.00 1.00 1.00 43,758 43,758 43,758 - 43,758 Maintenance Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 54,437 54,437 56,064 - 56,064 Crew Leader 5.00 5.00 5.00 196,140 196,140 158,681 - 158,681 W/WW Systems Operator 12.00 12.00 12.00 342,349 342,349 334,536 - 334,536 Total 24.00 24.00 0.00 23.00 921,174$ 921,174$ 829,416$ -$ 829,416$ Wastewater Treatment Activity Center Plant Operations Superintendent 1.00 1.00 1.00 63,518$ 63,518$ 64,789$ -$ 64,789$ WWTP Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 54,437 54,437 56,064 - 56,064 SCADA Systems Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 60,694 60,694 62,509 - 62,509 SCADA Systems Technician 1.00 2.00 2.00 47,721 95,145 96,944 - 96,944 Lead WWTP Operator 3.00 3.00 3.00 127,333 127,333 132,171 - 132,171 W/W Plant Operator 12.00 12.00 12.00 379,328 379,328 384,732 - 384,732 Lead Plant Operations Electrician 1.00 1.00 1.00 42,423 42,423 43,696 - 43,696 Plant Operations Electrician 1.00 1.00 1.00 33,037 33,037 33,288 - 33,288 Staff Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 32,913 32,913 28,678 - 28,678 * Temporary / Seasonal Position C-9 Personnel Personnel List Revised Revised Revisions Approved Budget Budget & SLAs Budget Revised Revised Base Revisions Approved FTE FTE FTE FTE Budget Budget Budget & SLAs Budget FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY12 Lead Lab Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 36,625 36,625 38,085 - 38,085 Lab Technician 2.00 2.00 2.00 58,692 58,692 62,196 - 62,196 Total 25.00 26.00 0.00 26.00 936,721$ 984,145$ 1,003,152$ -$ 1,003,152$ Wastewater Fund Position Totals Full Time Total 49.00 50.00 0.00 49.00 1,857,895$ 1,905,319$ 1,832,568$ -$ 1,832,568$ *Temp/Seasonal Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ WASTEWATER FUND TOTALS 49.00 50.00 0.00 49.00 1,857,895$ 1,905,319$ 1,832,568$ -$ 1,832,568$ Water Services Full Time Total 77.00 78.50 0.00 76.00 3,035,536$ 3,125,835$ 2,975,720$ -$ 2,975,720$ *Temp/Seasonal Total 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 10,340 10,369 10,398 - 10,398 Water Services Department Total 78.00 79.50 0.00 77.00 3,045,876$ 3,136,204$ 2,986,118$ -$ 2,986,118$ Sanitation Fund Residential Collection Activity Center Assistant Director of Public Works 0.15 0.25 0.25 15,028$ 21,438$ 22,100$ -$ 22,100$ Sanitation Superintendent 1.00 1.00 1.00 63,908 63,908 65,185 - 65,185 Sanitation Foreman 1.00 1.00 1.00 50,391 50,391 50,391 - 50,391 Route Manager 16.00 15.00 15.00 515,401 515,401 475,333 - 475,333 Light Equipment Operator 1.00 1.00 1.00 28,679 28,679 29,826 - 29,826 Equipment Operator 2.00 2.00 2.00 64,157 64,157 65,658 - 65,658 Recycling Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 44,014 44,014 45,334 - 45,334 Customer Service Representative 1.00 1.00 1.00 30,577 30,577 30,576 - 30,576 *Part-time Public Works Intern (temp/seasonal)1.00 1.00 1.00 9,380 9,406 9,406 - 9,406 Total 24.15 23.25 0.00 23.25 821,535$ 827,970$ 793,809$ -$ 793,809$ Commercial Collection Activity Center Assistant Director of Public Works 0.10 0.25 0.25 10,608$ 21,438$ 22,100$ -$ 22,100$ Sanitation Foreman 1.00 1.00 1.00 48,117 48,117 50,036 - 50,036 Container Coordinator 2.00 2.00 2.00 65,992 65,992 68,870 - 68,870 Route Manager 8.00 9.00 9.00 250,995 250,995 271,413 - 271,413 Total 11.10 12.25 0.00 12.25 375,712$ 386,542$ 412,419$ -$ 412,419$ Sanitation Fund Position Totals Full Time Total 34.25 34.50 0.00 34.50 1,187,867$ 1,205,106$ 1,196,823$ -$ 1,196,823$ *Temp/Seasonal Total 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 9,380$ 9,406$ 9,406$ -$ 9,406$ SANITATION FUND TOTALS 35.25 35.50 0.00 35.50 1,197,247$ 1,214,512$ 1,206,229$ -$ 1,206,229$ Property Casualty Division Risk Manager 0.50 0.50 0.50 27,844$ 27,844$ 35,798$ -$ 35,798$ Risk Claims Coordinator 0.50 0.50 0.50 23,141 23,141 23,830 - 23,830 Safety Officer 0.50 0.50 0.00 25,216 25,216 - - - Total 1.50 1.50 0.00 1.00 76,202$ 76,202$ 59,628$ -$ 59,628$ Property Casualty Fund Position Totals Full Time Total 1.50 1.50 0.00 1.00 76,202$ 76,202$ 59,628$ -$ 59,628$ *Temp/Seasonal Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ PROPERTY CASUALTY FUND TOTALS 1.50 1.50 0.00 1.00 76,202$ 76,202$ 59,628$ -$ 59,628$ Employee Benefits Division Employee Benefits Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 53,842$ 53,842$ 55,458$ -$ 55,458$ Total 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 53,842$ 53,842$ 55,458$ -$ 55,458$ Employee Benefits Fund Position Totals Full Time Total 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 53,842$ 53,842$ 55,458$ -$ 55,458$ *Temp/Seasonal Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND TOTALS 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 53,842$ 53,842$ 55,458$ -$ 55,458$ Worker's Compensation Division Risk Manager 0.50 0.50 0.50 27,844$ 27,844$ 35,798$ -$ 35,798$ Risk Claims Coordinator 0.50 0.50 0.50 23,141 23,141 23,830 - 23,830 Safety Officer 0.50 0.50 0.00 25,216 25,216 - - - Total 1.50 1.50 0.00 1.00 76,202$ 76,202$ 59,628$ -$ 59,628$ Worker's Compensation Fund Position Totals Full Time Total 1.50 1.50 0.00 1.00 76,202$ 76,202$ 59,628$ -$ 59,628$ *Temp/Seasonal Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ WORKER'S COMPENSATION FUND TOTALS 1.50 1.50 0.00 1.00 76,202$ 76,202$ 59,628$ -$ 59,628$ Utility Customer Service Fund Utility Customer Service Activity Center Utilities Office Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 71,828$ 71,828$ 72,905$ -$ 72,905$ Customer Service Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 46,214 46,214 47,601 - 47,601 Utilities Analyst 1.00 0.00 0.00 61,841 - - - - Senior Customer Serv. Rep.3.00 3.00 3.00 115,443 115,443 115,444 - 115,444 Customer Service Rep.12.00 12.00 12.00 349,478 326,098 348,376 - 348,376 Part-time Cust. Serv. Rep. (PT Regular)1.00 1.00 1.00 24,621 24,621 25,487 - 25,487 Total 19.00 18.00 0.00 18.00 669,425$ 584,204$ 609,813$ -$ 609,813$ Meter Services Activity Center Meter Services Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 52,852$ 52,852$ 54,958$ -$ 54,958$ Meter Tech Crew Leader 1.00 1.00 1.00 38,210 38,210 61,654 - 61,654 Meter Services Technician 2.00 2.00 2.00 71,789 71,789 73,104 - 73,104 Meter Services Crew Leader 2.00 2.00 2.00 59,421 59,421 38,481 - 38,481 * Temporary / Seasonal Position C-10 Personnel Personnel List Revised Revised Revisions Approved Budget Budget & SLAs Budget Revised Revised Base Revisions Approved FTE FTE FTE FTE Budget Budget Budget & SLAs Budget FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 FY12 Meter Services Field Rep.4.00 4.00 4.00 88,559 88,559 92,021 - 92,021 Meter Services Field Rep- (PT Regular)0.50 0.50 0.50 10,293 10,293 10,606 - 10,606 Total 10.50 10.50 0.00 10.50 321,124$ 321,124$ 330,824$ -$ 330,824$ Utility Customer Service Position Totals Full Time Total 29.50 28.50 0.00 28.50 990,549$ 905,328$ 940,637$ -$ 940,637$ *Temp/Seasonal Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ UTILITY CUSTOMER SERVICE FUND TOTALS 29.50 28.50 0.00 28.50 990,549$ 905,328$ 940,637$ -$ 940,637$ Fleet Maintenance Fund Fleet Services Parts Activity Center Assistant Buyer 1.00 1.00 1.00 34,831$ 34,831$ 36,229$ -$ 36,229$ Warehouse Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 28,699 28,699 30,138 - 30,138 Total 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 63,530$ 63,530$ 66,367$ -$ 66,367$ Fleet Services Admin. Activity Center Fleet Services Superintendent 1.00 1.00 1.00 71,832$ 71,832$ 73,268$ -$ 73,268$ Customer Service Rep.1.00 1.00 1.00 28,136 28,136 29,534 - 29,534 Shop Foreman 1.00 1.00 1.00 44,676 44,676 46,470 - 46,470 Mechanic 10.00 10.00 10.00 349,732 349,732 358,804 - 358,804 Total 13.00 13.00 0.00 13.00 494,376$ 494,376$ 508,076$ -$ 508,076$ Fleet Fund Full-time Position Totals Full Time Total 15.00 15.00 0.00 15.00 557,906$ 557,906$ 574,443$ -$ 574,443$ *Temp/Seasonal Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FLEET FUND TOTALS 15.00 15.00 0.00 15.00 557,906$ 557,906$ 574,443$ -$ 574,443$ Drainage Fund Engineering Division Drainage Inspector 0.00 0.00 1.00 -$ -$ 45,823$ -$ 45,823$ Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 -$ -$ 45,823$ -$ 45,823$ Drainage Division Foreman 0.00 0.00 1.00 -$ -$ 50,495$ -$ 50,495$ Crew Leader 0.00 0.00 1.00 - - 37,480 - 37,480 Equipment Operator 0.00 0.00 7.00 - - 188,011 - 188,011 GIS Technician 0.00 0.00 1.00 - - 35,812 - 35,812 Light Equipment Operator 0.00 0.00 3.00 - - 74,668 - 74,668 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.00 -$ -$ 386,466$ -$ 386,466$ Drainage Full-time Position Totals Full Time Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.00 -$ -$ 432,289$ -$ 432,289$ *Temp/Seasonal Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ DRAINAGE FUND TOTALS 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.00 -$ -$ 432,289$ -$ 432,289$ Brazos Valley Solid Waste Management Agency Fund Operations Activity Center Sanitary Landfill Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 73,429$ 73,429$ 73,429$ -$ 73,429$ Landfill Operations Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 50,390 50,390 50,391 - 50,391 Landfill Crew Leader 2.00 2.00 2.00 82,406 82,406 83,428 - 83,428 Equipment Operator 10.00 10.00 8.00 312,978 312,978 255,624 - 255,624 Environmental Compliance Officer 1.00 1.00 1.00 50,408 50,408 58,174 - 58,174 Spotter 1.00 1.00 1.00 26,634 26,634 25,320 - 25,320 Secretary/Office Asst./Scale Operator 3.00 3.00 3.00 74,563 74,563 83,324 - 83,324 Mechanic 2.00 2.00 2.00 63,259 63,259 71,373 - 71,373 Landfill Groundsworker 1.00 1.00 1.00 23,568 23,568 24,757 - 24,757 *Temp. Landfill Groundsworker (temp/seasonal)0.50 0.00 0.00 14,759 14,799 - - - *Part-time Equip. Operator (temp/seasonal)0.50 0.00 0.00 14,759 14,799 - - - *Field Service Person (temp/seasonal)0.50 0.00 0.00 14,759 14,799 - - - Waste Screener 1.00 1.00 1.00 31,431 31,431 32,683 - 32,683 Total 24.50 23.00 0.00 21.00 833,343$ 833,463$ 758,503$ -$ 758,503$ Administration Activity Center Asst Dir Public Works/BVSWMA 0.75 0.00 0.00 62,765 - -$ - - BVSWMA Program Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 54,048 54,048 55,128 - 55,128 *BVSWMA Intern (temp/seasonal)1.00 0.00 0.00 14,533 14,573 - - - Total 2.75 1.00 0.00 1.00 131,345$ 68,621$ 55,128$ -$ 55,128$ BVSWMA Fund Full-time Position Totals Full Time Total 24.75 24.00 0.00 22.00 905,879$ 843,114$ 813,631$ -$ 813,631$ *Temp/Seasonal Total 2.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 58,810$ 58,970$ -$ -$ -$ BVSWMA FUND TOTALS 27.25 24.00 0.00 22.00 964,688$ 902,084$ 813,631$ -$ 813,631$ All Funds Full-time Total 875.00 873.50 9.00 858.50 40,226,760$ 40,878,760$ 38,698,525$ 725,828$ 39,424,353$ ALL FUNDS TOTAL 941.00 935.50 9.00 916.25 41,630,407$ 42,195,256$ 39,835,196$ 709,788$ 40,544,984$ * Temporary / Seasonal Position C-11 Personnel Description FY06 Actual FY07 Actual FY08 Actual FY09 Actual FY10 Actual FY11 Revised Budget FY11 Year-End Estimate FY12 Approved Budget General Fund Revenues Current taxes 6,798,030 7,580,859 8,554,331 9,459,010 11,068,594 12,346,704 12,346,704 13,520,371 Delinquent taxes 37,079 70,432 51,408 68,757 58,032 65,000 56,000 65,000 Penalty and interest 29,848 46,649 46,250 43,843 46,281 42,000 42,000 42,000 Ad Valorem Taxes 6,864,957$ 7,697,940$ 8,651,989$ 9,571,610$ 11,172,907$ 12,453,704$ 12,444,704$ 13,627,371$ Local Sales Tax 16,748,283 18,068,595 19,824,512 19,436,672 19,328,577 19,077,164 19,950,000 20,350,000 Local Sales Tax 16,748,283$ 18,068,595$ 19,824,512$ 19,436,672$ 19,328,577$ 19,077,164$ 19,950,000$ 20,350,000$ Mixed drink tax 330,762 371,758 419,067 435,034 422,426 420,000 420,000 315,000 Natural gas franchise taxes 414,171 396,620 442,205 477,833 475,280 475,000 380,000 383,800 Telecable franchise taxes 680,995 724,901 830,216 1,003,111 1,100,979 1,050,000 1,050,000 1,050,000 Telephone franchise taxes 973,635 796,149 756,412 661,884 584,159 520,000 570,000 541,500 Oil & gas franchise taxes 53,370 - 41,567 43,755 35,131 35,000 34,000 34,000 Use of streets 10,170 13,525 20,379 31,035 15,353 20,000 18,000 18,000 BTU Franchise Taxes - - - - - - 34,000 80,000 Mixed Drink & Franchise 2,463,103$ 2,302,954$ 2,509,846$ 2,652,652$ 2,633,328$ 2,520,000$ 2,506,000$ 2,422,300$ Mixed drink 24,090 28,035 27,682 34,055 32,923 33,000 33,000 33,000 Bldg contractors license 17,858 19,830 17,933 18,194 17,076 16,500 16,500 16,500 Electrical licenses 3,974 3,750 2,550 2,650 3,386 2,500 5,000 5,000 Taxi licenses - - - - - - - - Itinerant vendor licenses 414 115 312 462 613 350 500 500 Irrigation licenses 1,012 700 950 1,000 1,112 800 900 900 Mechanical licenses 2,512 2,950 2,250 2,346 3,328 2,500 3,600 3,600 Plumbing licenses 1,762 2,200 2,050 2,150 100 - - - Grave Openers - - - - - - 100 100 Ambulance licenses 1,400 1,550 830 825 1,775 1,600 1,000 1,000 Wrecker licenses 6,355 5,875 7,280 8,585 7,705 7,000 7,000 7,000 Builders permits 588,141 771,350 716,576 578,988 543,352 475,000 580,000 550,000 Electrical permits 59,294 81,276 93,905 55,454 58,743 47,500 47,500 48,925 Plumbing permits 89,246 119,941 124,355 92,542 82,411 69,000 75,000 77,250 Mechanical permits 55,972 61,229 65,980 56,220 58,066 43,000 60,000 61,800 Rental Registration Fees - - - 63,194 60,525 55,000 70,000 72,100 Street cut permits - - - - - - - - Irrigation permits 11,520 10,320 10,320 8,800 11,060 8,500 7,500 7,725 Child safety programs 82,043 81,954 81,805 81,511 82,136 81,000 81,000 83,430 Bicycle permits - - - - - - - - Livestock - 30 125 175 35 35 35 36 Licenses and Permits 945,593$ 1,191,105$ 1,154,903$ 1,007,151$ 964,345$ 843,285$ 988,635$ 968,866$ General government grants 110,432 350,229 136,689 182 147,366 - 131,226 - Fiscal Grants - - - 3,860 - - - - Public Works Grants - - - 7,792 - - - - Federal Parks grants - - - - 7,000 - 2,917 - Federal Police grants 44,626 28,899 69,731 6,089 33,835 - 24,372 - Planning grants - - - - - - 3,000 - Federal Fire grants - - - 80,676 257,367 - 54,633 - State Parks grants - - - 278,417 (914) - - - State Police grants - - - - - - - - State Fire department 179,687 185,077 251,894 319,936 176,305 176,305 176,305 176,305 Police grants 2,000 - - - - - - - Reimbursed costs 272,499 23,147 39,386 106,926 71,395 - 47,552 40,000 Fiscal Reimb Costs - 25,000 25,000 Other - 17,000 - - - - - ` Intergovernmental Revenue 609,244$ 604,352$ 497,700$ 803,878$ 692,354$ 176,305$ 465,005$ 241,305$ Concessions 21,533 70,834 100,933 118,110 119,991 - - - Non-taxable - - - - 6,503 - - - Adamson pool revenues 148,167 159,315 171,601 154,253 198,830 - - - Cs jr high natatorium 5,401 7,364 4,628 7,409 6,635 - - - Southwood pool revenues 92,156 79,874 91,140 88,254 84,192 - - - Thomas pool revenues 24,578 21,781 30,787 36,720 31,514 - - - Swimming 104,827 91,456 116,651 116,429 105,669 - - - Tennis program 24,707 34,637 39,099 30,796 19,954 - - - Misc sports instruction 7,133 5,333 6,404 4,886 6,124 - - - Sports programs 294,307 284,209 286,683 306,231 313,396 - - - Tournament Fees - 141,420 70,796 64,307 204,164 55,000 60,000 55,000 WPC ticket sales (nt)2,375 3,820 - 1,367 7,562 2,000 2,000 2,000 Reimbursed expenses 13,562 17,637 7,365 27,575 5,094 18,000 18,000 18,000 Serior services programs 273 220 285 240 160 - - - Heritage programs - - - - 4,305 3,500 2,500 2,500 Teen center admissions 79 320 - - 374 - - - Revenue for Major Funds D-1 Revenue History and Budget Estimates Description FY06 Actual FY07 Actual FY08 Actual FY09 Actual FY10 Actual FY11 Revised Budget FY11 Year-End Estimate FY12 Approved Budget Revenue for Major Funds Teen center memberships 1,310 1,360 1,860 2,410 1,884 - - - Miscellaneous 297 - - - - - - - Lincoln center passes 16,677 21,525 17,583 21,758 15,480 - - - Other parks revenue (nt)15,019 23,576 4,777 7,341 9,085 - - - Misc parks revenue 4,254 12,344 12,036 18,019 2,160 8,000 2,500 3,000 Parks and Recreation 776,655$ 977,024$ 962,628$ 1,006,105$ 1,143,076$ 86,500$ 85,000$ 80,500$ Fingerprinting 8,678 6,684 6,362 7,924 6,822 6,900 5,500 5,610 Police reports 13,573 9,706 10,114 12,673 9,681 11,000 14,500 14,790 Records checks 359 354 382 320 344 300 500 510 Arrest fees 104,849 104,030 110,185 107,323 128,999 111,100 115,000 117,300 Warrant service fees - - - - - - - - Escort services 25,262 27,725 28,316 28,394 28,846 28,000 30,000 30,600 False alarms 9,975 14,235 15,925 11,325 11,025 11,300 7,500 7,650 Credit Card Convenience - 150 150 Restitution 1,761 7,808 810 - 28 100 1,400 1,428 Other 266,401 320,677 337,143 302,448 305,353 300,000 233,389 131,869 Police Department 430,858$ 491,217$ 509,237$ 470,407$ 491,098$ 468,700$ 407,939$ 309,907$ EMS transport (ambulance)618,084 421,894 198,070 306,946 283,949 222,200 250,000 255,000 EMS transport - NRS - 405,704 602,521 580,492 38,483 - 1,500 1,530 EMS Transport - Emergicon - - - 3,712 1,356,971 1,040,000 1,400,000 1,428,000 EMS Athletic Standbys - - 500 400 2,800 2,800 675 689 Other EMS standbys 1,238 713 - - - - - - EMS reports 377 269 82 54 39 100 10 10 Hazard materials response 7,027 4,231 - 31,011 - - - - Fire inspection fees - - - - - - - - Auto hood test 720 630 1,050 800 550 500 1,450 1,479 Auto fire alarm 1,273 431 4,246 7,890 3,113 2,000 5,000 5,100 Day care centers 360 360 640 927 850 800 800 816 Foster homes 120 300 300 405 630 400 500 510 Health care facilities 150 200 100 300 600 450 1,200 1,224 Nursing homes 50 100 550 300 150 150 150 153 Fire sprinkler/standpipe 2,240 8,557 8,262 11,585 4,236 5,000 8,000 8,160 Natural gas system - 4 - - - - - - Fuel line leak - - 100 - 600 - 1,200 1,224 Fuel tank leak - - - - - - - - Administration fee 1,440 1,320 960 720 360 - 250 255 Mowing charges 5,145 3,126 2,036 1,703 535 - 5,000 5,100 Restitution - - 388 202,121 5,222 4,000 6,000 6,120 Fire Reports - 4 - - 44 44 - - Other - - 885 - - - - 48,400 Fire Department 638,224$ 847,842$ 820,690$ 1,149,366$ 1,699,132$ 1,278,444$ 1,681,735$ 1,763,770$ Accident Fees - 3 - (5) (5) - - - General admin fees 56,331 55,714 44,875 46,510 65,200 61,200 52,000 53,040 Notary Fees - 125 125 Expungement Fee - 30 30 Court dismissal fees 6,620 7,730 12,410 17,680 26,100 25,500 20,000 20,400 Time pmt fee/unreserved 37,135 34,993 34,158 29,491 32,270 33,757 30,000 30,600 City omni 24,994 22,335 22,989 22,994 23,663 26,447 19,000 19,380 Warrant service fees 157,472 157,306 146,367 131,625 146,372 148,292 120,000 122,400 FTA Warrant service fees - 1,200 1,200 General admin fees 1,788 1,627 1,278 1,210 1,320 1,224 1,300 1,326 Credit Card Convenience - 8,000 8,000 Judicial/Courts 284,340$ 279,707$ 262,077$ 249,505$ 294,921$ 296,420$ 251,655$ 256,501$ Lot mowing - - - - - - - - Miscellaneous charges 15,766 25,175 19,773 17,576 12,945 15,300 9,000 9,180 Filing fees 125,255 134,977 135,856 78,973 199,966 174,000 290,000 295,800 Zoning letters 760 1,711 1,198 640 1,200 714 - - Misc planning charges 4,521 2,828 6,097 3,985 2,235 2,550 2,750 2,805 O & G pipeline admin fees 102,760 4,880 42,312 5,725 9,202 9,384 8,600 8,600 Maps/plans/ordinances 557 490 330 279 244 306 20 20 Misc engineering charges 2,768 2,177 1,679 6,747 1,757 2,040 0 0 Miscellaneous - - - - - - 501 500 Development Services 252,387$ 172,238$ 207,245$ 113,925$ 227,549$ 204,294$ 310,871$ 316,905$ Certificate searches 26,517 31,344 30,599 34,245 34,957 35,700 30,000 30,600 Preservation fee 2 - - - - - - - Xerox/repro charges 685 222 520 1,712 2,217 1,530 900 918 Postage/Certificate Mail - - - - 109 - 200 205 Notary Fees - 50 51 D-2 Revenue History and Budget Estimates Description FY06 Actual FY07 Actual FY08 Actual FY09 Actual FY10 Actual FY11 Revised Budget FY11 Year-End Estimate FY12 Approved Budget Revenue for Major Funds CSO Miscellaneous - 150 153 General Government 27,204$ 31,566$ 31,119$ 35,957$ 37,283$ 37,230$ 31,300$ 31,927$ Charges for Services 1,633,013$ 1,822,571$ 1,830,368$ 2,019,160$ 2,749,983$ 2,285,088$ 2,683,500$ 2,679,010$ Child safety seat 45,854 43,906 44,626 30,600 41,778 40,000 40,000 40,800 Child Safety Fund - 6,000 6,000 City parking fines 1,347 1,038 316 1,194 3,364 3,570 750 765 Civil parking fines 3,828 2,917 4,612 3,267 2,073 2,315 1,200 1,224 City pedestrian fines - - - - - - - - Traffic fines 44,874 39,974 41,243 35,676 44,672 40,000 37,000 37,740 Other mun court fines 3,190,004 3,168,653 3,322,030 3,204,096 3,353,090 3,350,000 3,250,000 3,315,000 Misc fines and penalties - - - - 175 179 - - Forfeited deposits - - - - - - - - Fines and Forfeits 3,285,907$ 3,256,488$ 3,412,827$ 3,274,833$ 3,445,152$ 3,436,064$ 3,334,950$ 3,401,529$ Bank account interest 432 - - - - - - - Interest on investments 456,832 604,901 458,641 208,072 98,191 115,000 65,200 65,852 Realized gain/loss (628) 398 25,269 74 696 - 1,152 1,164 Net Inc/Dec in FMV - 92,113 10,939 - (43,798) - - - Other - - 753 - - - - - Investment Income 456,636$ 697,412$ 495,602$ 208,146$ 55,089$ 115,000$ 66,352$ 67,016$ Capital imprvmnts assmnts 131,823 - 914 - - - - - Ballfield rentals 30,040 32,583 29,153 35,480 38,255 35,800 45,000 45,900 Lincoln rentals 12,050 13,148 16,382 14,572 16,783 - - - Park pavilion rentals 22,210 23,460 27,703 32,558 35,500 34,000 34,000 34,680 Teen center rentals 1,935 938 725 350 2,765 - - - Mineral royalty interests 3,231 3,700 1,836 513 - - 1,800 1,800 Conference center rentals 197 - - - - - - - Conf ctr rent (taxable)9,059 9,494 10,691 5,228 4,225 - - - Conf Ctr rent (nontaxable)109,795 128,165 132,539 134,590 151,209 - - - WPC ampitheatre 3,050 3,000 5,096 16,320 10,346 7,575 12,000 12,240 Equip rental (nontaxable)- - - - - - - - Misc rents and royalties 53,298 46,738 54,880 53,049 53,392 53,631 45,000 45,900 Police 1,832 7,199 5,001 4,841 3,326 1,520 275 275 Fire - - 2,000 70 - - 5,000 5,000 Parks and recreation 5,449 7,906 1,545 1,254 540 758 12,000 - Library - 16,500 16,500 16,500 11,500 11,615 10,000 10,000 Miscellaneous 5,000 - - 60 - - - - Damage reimbursement 1,099 266 426 - - - - - Animal control services 26,153 11,400 - - - - - - Fire 13,362 20,231 23,789 24,424 103,396 21,210 15,000 15,000 Other reimbursed expenses 14,765 (13,824) - - - - 1,100 1,100 Other misc revenue - 215 817 6 - - 15,000 15,000 Cash over/short 446 400 (297) 1,105 (2,511) - - - Collection service fees 1,117 1,401 889 615 445 404 400 400 Municipal court 124,087 120,749 116,082 105,486 135,494 121,200 100,000 100,000 Sale of abandoned proprty - - - - - - - - Sale of scrap 2,426 13,851 2,455 3,090 7,928 4,545 2,500 2,500 Other 57,714 72,411 32,555 58,722 63,784 52,520 30,000 30,000 Other misc rev/taxable - - - - - - - - Other misc rev/nontaxable 9,053 7,000 7,000 21,429 20,000 20,200 43,000 43,000 Thoroughfare rehab fund - - - - - - - - Police Seizure fund 5,968 - - - - - - - General fund (contra)- - - - - - - - Community development 3,947 9,868 8,200 16,624 13,800 - - - Red Light Camera Fund - - 28,233 - - - - - General Govt. Proj. fund 24,421 32,000 - - - - - - Sale of gen fixed assets 17,500 11,080 13,621 5,606 5,615 2,767 - - Miscellaneous 691,025$ 579,879$ 538,735$ 552,492$ 675,792$ 367,745$ 372,075$ 362,795$ Electric 5,417,000 6,556,620 7,641,082 8,244,343 8,909,891 8,809,891 7,309,891 6,809,891 Water 925,000 1,039,600 1,107,238 1,109,573 1,408,505 1,295,000 1,295,000 1,333,850 Sewer 982,000 1,021,900 1,092,115 1,125,885 1,219,722 1,171,400 1,171,400 1,206,542 Solid Waste collection 369,000 409,000 463,000 487,000 716,644 703,056 703,056 709,987 Return on Investment 7,693,000$ 9,027,120$ 10,303,435$ 10,966,801$ 12,254,762$ 11,979,347$ 10,479,347$ 10,060,270$ General Fund Total $ 42,167,415 $ 46,225,440 $ 50,182,545 $ 51,499,500 $ 55,115,362 $ 53,340,202 $ 53,375,568 $ 54,260,962 Recreation Fund Revenues Sports - - - - - 300,000 308,477 358,663 Aquatics - - - - - 306,550 320,760 467,669 D-3 Revenue History and Budget Estimates Description FY06 Actual FY07 Actual FY08 Actual FY09 Actual FY10 Actual FY11 Revised Budget FY11 Year-End Estimate FY12 Approved Budget Revenue for Major Funds Concessions - - - - - 114,000 123,500 - Instruction - - - - - 234,759 234,142 96,654 SW Center/Lincoln Center - - - - - 41,755 62,694 51,780 Conference Center - - - - - 156,247 168,411 222,850 Interest - - - - - 400 200 400 Rec Rund Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,153,711$ 1,218,184$ 1,198,016$ Hotel Tax Fund Revenues Hotel/motel tax revenue 2,671,417 2,980,250 3,585,512 3,574,649 3,416,685 3,394,000 3,339,287 3,372,680 Penalty and interest - - - - 28 - - - Interest on investments 153,589 246,468 263,489 12,683 24,767 28,000 28,000 28,000 Realized gain/loss (159) 136 13,111 16 206 - - - Net Inc/Dec in FMV - 46,487 7,454 - - - - - Hist pres proj revenue 88 500 2,025 - - - - - Other - - - - - - 249,243 - Hotel Tax Fund Total 2,824,935$ 3,273,841$ 3,871,591$ 3,587,348$ 3,441,686$ 3,422,000$ 3,616,530$ 3,400,680$ Debt Service Fund Revenues Current taxes 8,941,462 9,896,134 10,917,976 12,001,683 12,064,837 11,958,136 11,958,136 11,523,526 Delinquent taxes 40,208 78,354 46,365 85,729 73,859 62,551 62,551 58,260 Penalty and interest 34,614 56,265 48,099 51,325 52,917 37,449 37,449 41,740 Interest on investments 155,870 246,286 284,105 111,370 50,259 100,000 40,000 45,000 Realized gain/loss (160) 305 9,344 1,102 250 - - - Net Inc/Dec in FMV - 27,757 3,658 - - - - Accrued bond interest 52,369 39,503 53,637 - 1,317 - - - Proceeds/Long Term Debt - - - - 4,265,000 - - - Premiums on Bonds Sold - - - - 75,183 - - - Wolf Pen Creek TIF Fund *1,108,452 1,078,776 1,042,475 - - - - Electric Fund *375,026 376,014 - - - - - Wastewater Fund *317,819 318,656 - - - - - Ngate Parking Garage Fund *- - - (285,548) - - - Equipment replacement *587,123 551,625 379,688 180,350 - - - Convention Center Fund*- - - - 222,519 222,519 224,444 Hotel Tax Fund*- - - - 223,615 - - - BVSWMA, Inc*- - - - 395,419 - 399,235 Other 17,567 10,628,648 - - 30 - 12,372,070 - Debt Service Fund Total 11,630,350$ 23,298,321$ 12,785,347$ 12,146,011$ 16,807,267$ 12,776,074$ 24,692,725$ 12,292,205$ * Transfers in from other funds Electric Fund Revenues Residental/taxable 33,689,254 36,779,268 42,727,931 46,465,656 51,954,211 55,724,838 55,719,843 56,400,500 Commer-industrial/taxable 18,496,501 21,468,912 24,374,504 25,289,099 27,280,846 30,247,342 30,079,121 30,308,370 Comm-ind sales/nontaxable 5,913,587 6,783,500 7,909,696 8,628,692 9,536,882 9,820,755 10,297,585 10,384,130 Security lights 73,875 82,774 92,328 90,758 98,581 110,000 95,665 98,000 Other electric sales 37,915 40,100 30,830 25,500 28,210 32,000 22,500 28,000 Electric property rental 45,888 20,783 20,783 - - - - - Pole Contact and Use - 9,110 - 189,926 193,146 200,000 212,000 212,000 Forf/discounts/penalties 984,154 1,177,828 1,296,292 1,386,323 1,440,802 1,500,000 1,590,000 1,545,000 Connect fees 227,720 235,765 248,215 231,690 220,540 235,000 235,000 243,000 Misc operating revenues 66,891 38,388 72,520 126,060 182,124 175,000 193,000 190,000 Interest on investments 416,984 653,687 451,283 278,399 89,484 120,000 90,000 90,500 Realized gain/(loss) (372) 305 25,152 124 770 - - - Net Incr/Decr in FMV - 98,917 14,921 - - - - - Reimbursed Exp/UG Const - - - - - - 886,953 - Street lighting - - - - - - - - Damage reimbursement 24,454 15,186 17,953 20,478 5,765 10,300 5,000 5,000 Other reimbursed expenses 200,505 132,331 156,125 255,153 26,434 20,000 4,000 4,000 Customers/taxable - - - - - - - - Cash over/short 57 (353) (254) (357) (0) - - - Collection service fees 5,670 7,151 7,988 8,276 9,644 9,000 10,000 10,000 Mineral royalty interest 272 473 199 43 - - - - Sale of scrap 19,882 11,030 3,404 25,036 41,922 30,000 35,000 32,000 Gain on sale of property 4,399 - - 127,440 - - - Misc nonoperating revenue 20,428 30,104 40,892 10,740 7,907 55,000 20,000 20,000 Other revenue (616) - - - - - - - General Fund - - 40,000 - 40,000 40,000 40,000 Other Misc Revenue 256 - 55 - 136 - - - Transfers In: Equipment Replacement - - 164,408 - - - - Transfers In General Gov't Fund - - - - - - - 763,286 Transfers In: Economic Development Fun - - - - - 77,386 - 250,000 Intergovernmental Revenue: Grants - - 18,941 - - - - Electric Fund Total 60,227,704$ 67,585,260$ 77,490,817$ 83,254,945$ 91,244,844$ 98,406,621$ 99,535,667$ 100,623,786$ Water Fund Revenues Residential 8,131,832 7,240,159 8,667,800 10,473,028 9,361,705 7,765,280 8,888,660 8,131,000 Commercial 2,192,864 2,017,945 2,593,545 3,408,045 2,950,130 5,104,128 5,769,400 5,164,000 D-4 Revenue History and Budget Estimates Description FY06 Actual FY07 Actual FY08 Actual FY09 Actual FY10 Actual FY11 Revised Budget FY11 Year-End Estimate FY12 Approved Budget Revenue for Major Funds Connect fees 72,870 83,996 82,490 74,130 71,680 72,048 73,000 75,000 Water taps 380,339 577,798 412,900 242,472 247,140 251,885 230,000 253,000 Misc operating revenues 1,750 134,702 2,610 1,700 2,215 1,500 3,000 2,000 Interest on investments 339,266 150,007 230,729 162,528 73,182 100,000 75,000 75,000 Realized gain/(loss)(376) 88 11,705 86 387 - - - Net Incr/Decr in FMV - - 7,414 - - - - - Damage reimbursement - 40,801 28,859 - - - - - Subrogation recovered 4,711 - 3,287 27,582 (163) - - - Other reimbursed expenses 2,175 - 55,607 13,084 - - - - Developers - - - - - - - - Land Rentals/Leases - - 20,000 28,269 31,269 25,000 22,000 25,000 Sale of Scrap - - 34,795 8,090 28,486 8,000 20,000 15,000 Gain on sale of property 1,000 - - - 15,763 - - - Misc nonoperating revenue 34,783 10,778 294 - 10,800 - 19,200 - Other revenue - - - - 49 - - - General Fund - - - 40,000 - 40,000 40,000 40,000 Other Transfers In / Equipment Replacem - - - 127,880 - - - - Water Fund Total 11,161,214$ 10,256,274$ 12,152,034$ 14,606,894$ 12,792,643$ 13,367,841$ 15,140,260$ 13,780,000$ Wastewater Fund Revenues Residential 8,050,560 8,370,414 8,966,761 9,515,950 9,424,604 9,801,697 10,177,590 10,406,594 Commercial 1,802,108 1,913,339 2,004,960 1,962,868 1,892,613 2,040,350 2,000,790 2,110,257 Sewer taps 228,400 237,080 197,965 203,055 173,560 202,143 143,000 160,000 Misc operating revenues 17,942 (17,738)6,719 7,152 - 5,000 7,000 5,000 Interest on investments 214,545 239,756 248,558 156,881 64,686 114,000 60,000 52,000 Realized gain/(loss)(236) 118 12,575 80 339 - - - Net Incr/Decr in FMV - 63,292 7,554 - - - - - Subrogation recovered - 2,986 - - - - - - Other reimbursed expenses 2,948 - - - - - - - Developers - - - - - - - - Sale of scrap 3,543 - - 128 1,550 - - - Gain on sale of property 7,700 - - - 23,183 - - - Misc nonoperating revenue 6,786 18,804 7,711 80 5,818 - - - Other revenue - 6,968 - - - - - 1,000 General Fund - - - 40,000 - 40,000 40,000 40,000 Other Transfers In / Equipment Replacem - - - 605,314 - - - - Wastewater Fund Total 10,334,296$ 10,835,019$ 11,452,803$ 12,491,508$ 11,586,353$ 12,203,190$ 12,428,380$ 12,774,851$ Sanitation Fund Revenues Residential/taxable 3,623,173 4,094,400 4,312,679 4,549,527 4,671,826 4,728,634 4,757,911 4,829,280 Residential sales/nontax 16,137 17,930 18,592 20,806 21,469 19,770 31,093 31,559 Commercial/taxable 1,695,480 1,930,969 2,010,993 1,961,770 1,858,658 1,928,232 1,939,903 1,967,496 Commercial/nontaxable 261,732 300,923 314,591 323,801 311,689 331,158 319,487 314,488 State surcharge/taxable 1,385 3,505 2,797 1,667 1,771 1,600 1,000 1,600 State surcharge/nontax - 4 3 - 7 - - - Dead animal pickup 552 - - - - - - - Rolloff rental/taxable 15,773 21,379 20,534 18,628 17,355 14,000 14,000 14,000 Rolloff rental/nontaxable 1,669 1,796 1,554 1,966 1,275 1,600 - 1,600 Misc fees for servcs/tax 12,399 11,304 12,341 17,489 23,448 21,000 16,000 21,000 Misc fees for servcs/ntax 807 498 999 1,094 1,904 2,400 - 2,400 Dumpster sales 80 74 30 - - - - - Other operating: recycling 50,238 64,584 86,452 46,462 48,182 46,000 15,000 46,000 Misc operating revenues 6,344 - - - - - - - Interest on investments 18,929 9,427 15,315 59,450 276,404 12,000 305,325 12,000 Realized gain/(loss)(27) 1 846 99 189 - - - Net Incr/Decr in FMV - 1,353 349 - - - - - Other reimbursed expenses 2,655 2,280 85 - - - - - State Grants - - - 17,792 - - - - Collection service fees 1,636 2,061 2,184 2,065 1,472 1,000 1,300 1,000 Sale of scrap - - - 6,657 - - - - Gain on Sale of Property - - (632) - (25,394) - - - Misc nonoperating revenue - 4,509 (27) 3,940 175,000 - - - Other revenue 370 - - - - - - - Other Misc Revenue - (37,737)- - - - - - Sanitation Fund Total 5,709,332$ 6,429,259$ 6,799,685$ 7,033,213$ 7,385,255$ 7,107,394$ 7,401,019$ 7,242,423$ Drainage Fund Revenues Other reimbursed expenses - 6,680 - 14,000 - 13,473 Residential 922,539 956,378 1,001,871 1,480,027 1,529,287 1,558,957 1,537,922 1,584,060 Commercial 236,573 243,187 251,370 313,147 365,976 327,843 380,710 392,140 Interest on investments 258,976 227,207 120,152 58,652 24,372 29,900 12,000 8,100 Realized gain/loss - - 6,025 25 159 - - Net Incr/Decr in FMV - 2,895 (1,850) (9,616)- - Other 15,009 - 648 - - - Drainage Fund Total 1,433,097$ 1,426,772$ 1,389,641$ 1,850,002$ 1,910,178$ 1,930,700$ 1,930,632$ 1,997,773$ Major Funds Revenue Total 145,488,346$ 169,330,186$ 176,124,462$ 186,469,421$ 200,283,588$ 258,201,646$ 320,092,816$ 309,392,498$ D-5 Revenue History and Budget Estimates College Station City Charter Amended 5132006-Page 10 ARTICLE V THE BUDGET Fiscal Year Section 45. The fiscal year of the City of College Station shall be determined by ordinance of the Council. Such fiscal year shall also constitute the budget and accounting year. Preparation and Submission of Budget Section 46. The City Manager, between thirty (30) and ninety (90) days prior to the beginning of each fiscal year, shall submit to the City Council a proposed budget which shall provide a complete financial plan for the fiscal year. Proposed Expenditures Compared With Other Years Section 47. The City Manager shall, in the preparation of the budget, place in parallel columns opposite the various items of expenditures the actual amount of such items of expenditures for the last completed fiscal year, the estimated for the current fiscal year, and the proposed amount for the ensuing fiscal year. Budget a Public Record Section 48. The budget and all supporting schedules shall be filed with the City Secretary when submitted to the City Council and shall be a public record for inspection by anyone. The City Manager shall cause copies to be made for distribution to all interested persons. Notice of Public Hearing on Budget Section 49. At the meeting at which the budget is submitted, the City Council shall fix the time and place of a public hearing on the budget and shall cause to be published a notice of the hearing setting forth the time and place thereof at least five (5) days before the date of the hearing. Public Hearing on Budget Section 50. At the time and place set for a public hearing on the budget, or at any time and place to which such public hearing shall from time to time be adjourned, the City Council shall hold a public hearing on the budget submitted, and all interested persons shall be given an opportunity to be heard for or against any item or the amount of any item therein contained. Proceedings on Budget After Public Hearing Amending or Supplementing Budget Section 51. After the conclusion of such public hearing, the City Council may insert new items or may increase or decrease the items of the budget, except items in proposed expenditures fixed by law. Before inserting any additional item or increasing any item of appropriation which will increase the total budget by three (3%) percent or more, it must cause to be published a notice setting forth the nature of the proposed increases and fixing a place and time, not less than five (5) days after publication, at which the City Council will hold a public hearing thereon. E-1 Budget Provision Stated in Charter College Station City Charter Amended 5132006-Page 11 Proceedings on Adoption of Budget Section 52. After such further hearing, the City Council may insert the additional item or items, and make the increase or increases, to the amount in each case indicated by the published notice, or to a lesser amount; but where it shall increase the total proposed expenditures, it shall also provide for an increase in the total anticipated revenue to at least equal such total proposed expenditures. Vote Required for Adoption Section 53. The budget shall be adopted by the favorable vote of a majority of the members of the entire City Council. Date of Final Adoption; Failure to Adopt Section 54. The budget shall be finally adopted not later than the twenty-seventh day of the last month of the fiscal year. Should the City Council take no final action on or prior to such day, the budget as submitted by the City Manager shall be deemed to have been finally adopted. Effective Date of Budget; Certification; Copies Made Available Section 55. Upon final adoption, the budget shall be filed with the City Secretary. The final budget shall be printed, or otherwise reproduced, and a reasonable number of copies shall be made available for the use of all offices, departments and agencies, and for the use of interested persons and civic organizations. Budget Establishes Appropriations Section 56. From the effective date of the budget, the several amounts stated therein as proposed expenditures shall be and become appropriated to the several objects and purposes therein named. Budget Establishes Amount to be Raised by Property Tax Section 57. From the effective date of the budget, the amount stated therein as the amount to be raised by property tax shall constitute a determination of the amount of the levy for the purposes of the City in the corresponding tax year. Contingent Appropriation Section 58. Provision shall be made in the annual budget and in the appropriation ordinance for a contingent appropriation in an amount not more than three (3) percent of the total budget expenditure, to be used in case of unforeseen items of expenditures. Such contingent appropriation shall be under the control of the City Manager and distributed by him, after approval by the City Council. Expenditures from this appropriation shall be made only in case of established emergencies and a detailed account of such expenditures shall be recorded and reported. The proceeds of the contingent appropriation shall be disbursed only by transfer to other departmental appropriation, the spending of which shall be charged to the departments or activities for which the appropriations are made. Estimated Expenditures Shall Not Exceed Estimated Resources Section 59. The total estimated expenditures of the general fund and debt fund shall not exceed the total estimated resources of each fund. The City Council may by ordinance amend the budget during a fiscal year if one of the following conditions exists: 1. If during the fiscal year the City Manager certifies that there are available for appropriation revenues in excess of those estimated in the budget, the City Council, by ordinance, may make supplemental appropriations for the year up to the amount of such excess. Before approval, the Council shall hold a public hearing on the proposed budget amendment. A notice of the time and place of a public hearing on E-2 Budget Provision Stated in Charter College Station City Charter Amended 5132006-Page 12 the supplemental appropriation shall be published in the official newspaper of the City of College Station. The notice shall be placed in the newspaper at least five (5) working days before the date of the hearing. 2. To meet a public emergency affecting life, health and property of the public peace, the City Council may make emergency appropriations. Such appropriations may be made by emergency ordinance. To the extent that there are no available unappropriated revenues or a sufficient fund balance to meet such appropriations, the Council may by such emergency ordinance authorize the issuance of emergency notes, which may be renewed from time to time, but the emergency notes and renewals of any such notes made during a fiscal year shall be paid not later than the last day of the fiscal year next succeeding that in which the emergency appropriation was made. 3. If at any time during the fiscal year it appears probable to the City Manager that the revenues or fund balances available will be insufficient to meet the amounts appropriated, he shall report to the City Council without delay, indicating the estimated amount of the deficit, any remedial action taken by him and his recommendations as to any other steps to be taken. The Council shall then take such further action as it deems necessary to prevent or reduce any deficit and for that purpose it may by ordinance reduce one or more appropriations. Lapse of Appropriation Section 60. All appropriations shall lapse at the end of the fiscal year to the extent that they shall not have been expended or lawfully encumbered. E-3 Budget Provision Stated in Charter FISCAL AND BUDGETARY  POLICY STATEMENTS  I. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE The broader intent of the following Fiscal and Budgetary Policy Statements is to enable the City to achieve a long-term stable and positive financial condition. The watchwords of the City’s financial management include integrity, prudent stewardship, planning, accountability, and full disclosure. The more specific purpose is to provide guidelines to the Chief Financial Officer in planning and directing the City’s day- to-day financial affairs and in developing recommendations to the City Manager and City Council. The scope of these policies generally spans, among other issues, accounting, purchasing, auditing, financial reporting, internal controls, operating and capital budgeting, revenue management, cash and investment management, expenditure control, asset management, debt management, and planning concepts, in order to: A. Present fairly and with full disclosure the financial position and results of the financial operations of the City in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and B. Determine and demonstrate compliance with finance related legal and contractual issues in accordance with provisions of the Texas Local Government Code and other pertinent legal documents and mandates. The City Council will annually review and approve the Fiscal and Budgetary Policy Statements as part of the budget process. II. OPERATING BUDGET A. PREPARATION. Budgeting is an essential element of the financial planning, control, and evaluation process of municipal government. The “operating budget” is the City’s annual financial operating plan. The budget includes all of the operating departments of the City, the debt service fund, all capital projects funds, and the internal service funds of the City. The budgets for the General Funds and Special Revenue Funds are prepared in the Office of Budget and Strategic Planning on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Under this basis, revenues are recognized when they become measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. Expenditures are recognized when the related fund liability is incurred with the exception of: unmatured interest on long term debt which is recognized when due, and certain compensated absences and claims and judgments such as accrued vacation leave which are recognized when the obligations are expected to be liquidated with expendable resources. The budgets for the Enterprise and Internal Service Funds are similarly prepared on the modified accrual basis of accounting where cash transactions are included in the budget presentation in lieu of non cash transactions such as depreciation. The focus is on the net change in working capital (current assets less current liabilities). The budget is prepared with the cooperation of all City Departments, and is submitted to the City Manager who makes any necessary changes and transmits the document to the City Council. The budget shall be presented to the City Council no later than six weeks prior to fiscal year end, and shall be enacted by the City Council on or before the twenty-seventh day of the last month of the preceding fiscal year. 1. APPROVED BUDGET. An approved budget shall be prepared by the Manager with the participation of all of the City’s Department Directors within the provisions of the City Charter. a. The budget shall include four basic segments for review and evaluation: (1) personnel costs, (2) base budget for operations and maintenance costs, (3) service level adjustments for increases or decreases to existing service levels, and (4) revenues. F-1 Fiscal and Budgetary Policy Statements b. The budget review process shall include Council participation in the development of each of the four segments of the approved budget and a public hearing to allow for citizen participation in the budget preparation. c. The budget process shall span sufficient time to address policy and fiscal issues by the Council. d. A copy of the approved budget shall be filed with the City Secretary when it is submitted to the City Council in accordance with the provisions of the City Charter. 2. ADOPTION. Upon the presentation of an approved budget document to the Council, the Council shall call and publicize a public hearing. The Council will subsequently adopt by ordinance such budget as it may have been amended as the City’s Annual Budget, effective for the fiscal year beginning October 1. 3. BUDGET AWARD. The operating budget will be submitted annually to the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) for evaluation and consideration for the Award for Distinguished Budget Presentation. B. BALANCED BUDGET. The operating budget will be balanced with current revenues, exclusive of beginning resources, greater than or equal to current expenditures/expenses. Excess balances shall be used as capital funds or other non-recurring expenditures. C. PLANNING. The budget process will be coordinated so as to identify major policy issues for City Council. The budget process will be a part of an overall strategic planning process for the City. D. REPORTING. Periodic financial reports will be prepared to enable the Department Directors to assess their budgetary and operational performance and to enable the Office of Budget and Strategic Planning to monitor and control the budget as authorized by the City Manager. Summary financial reports will be presented to the City Council quarterly within thirty (30) working days after the end of each quarter. Such reports will be in a format appropriate to enable the City Council to understand the big picture budget status. E. CONTROL. Operating expense control is addressed in Section IV. of these Policies. F. CONTINGENT APPROPRIATION. Pursuant to Section 58 of the Charter of the City of College Station, the City will establish an adequate contingent appropriation in each of the operating funds. The expenditure for this appropriation shall be made only in cases of emergency, and a detailed account shall be recorded and reported. The proceeds shall be disbursed only by transfer to departmental appropriation. The transfer of this budget appropriation shall be under the control of the City Manager and may be distributed by him in amounts not exceeding $15,000. Any transfer involving more than such amounts must be expressly approved in advance by the City Council. All transfers from the contingent appropriation will be evaluated using the following criteria: 1. Is the request of such an emergency nature that it must be made immediately? 2. Why was the item not budgeted in the normal budget process? 3. Why can’t the transfer be made within the division or department? III. REVENUE MANAGEMENT. A. OPTIMUM CHARACTERISTICS. The City will strive for the following optimum characteristics in its revenue system: 1. SIMPLICITY. The City, where possible and without sacrificing accuracy, will strive to keep the revenue system simple in order to reduce compliance costs for the taxpayer or service recipient. A corresponding decrease in the City’s cost of collection and a reduction in avoidance to pay will thus result. The City will avoid nuisance taxes or charges as revenue sources. F-2 Fiscal and Budgetary Policy Statements 2. CERTAINTY. A knowledge and understanding of revenue sources increases the reliability of the revenue system. The City will understand its revenue sources and enact consistent collection policies to provide assurances that the revenue base will materialize according to budgets and plans. 3. EQUITY. The City shall make every effort to maintain equity in its revenue system; i.e., the City shall seek to minimize or eliminate all forms of subsidization between entities, funds, services, utilities, and customer classes. 4. REVENUE ADEQUACY. The City shall require that there be a balance in the revenue system; i.e., the revenue base will have the characteristic of fairness and neutrality as it applies to cost of service, willingness to pay, and ability to pay. 5. ADMINISTRATION. The benefits of a revenue source will exceed the cost of levying and collecting that revenue. The cost of collection will be reviewed annually for cost effectiveness as a part of the indirect cost and cost of service analysis. Where appropriate, the City will use the administrative processes of State or Federal collection agencies in order to reduce administrative costs. 6. DIVERSIFICATION AND STABILITY. A diversified revenue system with a stable source of income shall be maintained. This approach will help avoid instabilities in particular revenue sources due to factors such as fluctuations in the economy and variations in the weather. Stability is achieved by a balance between elastic and inelastic revenue sources. B. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS. The following considerations and issues will guide the City in its revenue policies concerning specific sources of funds: 1. COST/BENEFIT OF INCENTIVES FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. The City will use due caution in the analysis of any tax or fee incentives that are used to encourage development. Ideally, a cost/benefit (fiscal impact) analysis will be performed as part of such evaluation. 2. NON-RECURRING REVENUES. One-time or non-recurring revenues will not be used to finance ongoing operations. Non-recurring revenues should be used only for one-time expenditures such as long-lived capital needs. They will not be used for budget balancing purposes. 3. PROPERTY TAX REVENUES. All real and business personal property located within the City shall be valued at 100% of the fair market value for any given year based on the current appraisal supplied to the City by the Brazos County Appraisal District. Reappraisal and reassessment shall be done at a minimum of once every three years. A ninety-six and one half percent (96.5%) collection rate shall serve each year as a minimum goal for tax collections. The City Manager may, for budget and forecasting purposes, use up to the tax rate in effect for the current year’s budget. This policy will require that the City Manager justify a tax rate that is different from the current tax rate. The justification will be based on City Council directions, needs arising from voter authorized bonds, or other extraordinary conditions as may arise from time to time. 4. INVESTMENT INCOME. Earnings from investment (both interest and capital gains) of available monies, whether pooled or not, will be distributed to the funds in accordance with the equity balance of the fund from which monies were provided to be invested. 5. USER-BASED FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES. For services associated with a user fee or charge, the direct and indirect costs of that service will be offset by a fee where possible. There will be a review of fees and charges no less than once every three years to ensure that fees provide adequate coverage of costs of services. User charges may be classified as “full cost recovery,” “partial cost recovery,” and “minimal cost recovery,” based upon City Council policy. F-3 Fiscal and Budgetary Policy Statements a. Full fee support (80-100%) will be obtained from enterprise operations such as utilities, sanitation service, landfill, cemetery and licenses and permits. b. Partial fee support (50-80%) will be generated by charges for emergency medical services, miscellaneous licenses and fines, and all adults’ sports programs. c. Minimum fee support (0-50%) will be obtained from other parks, recreational, cultural, and youth programs and activities. 6. ENTERPRISE FUND RATES. The City will review and adopt utility rates as needed to generate revenues required to fully cover operating expenses, meet the legal restrictions of all applicable bond covenants, and provide for an adequate level of working capital. Additionally, enterprise activity rates will include transfers to and receive credits from other funds as follows: a. General and Administrative (G&A) Charges. G&A costs will be charged to all funds for services of general overhead, such as administration, finance, customer billing, personnel, technology, engineering, legal counsel, and other costs as appropriate. The charges will be determined through an indirect cost allocation study following accepted practices and procedures. b. Payment for Return on Investment. The intent of this transfer is to provide a benefit to the citizens for the ownership of the various utility operations they own. This transfer will be made in accordance with the following two methods, not to exceed 10% of the total estimated operating revenues for the Water and Wastewater Funds, 10.5% for the Electric fund, and 10% for the Sanitation Fund: (1) In-Lieu-of-Franchise-Fee. In-lieu-of-franchise fee will be included as a part of the rate computation at 4% of gross sales consistent with the franchise rates charged to investor owned utilities franchised to operate within the City. (2) Return on Investment. The Return on Investment will be calculated at 8% of total Fund Equity. 7. INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUES. Reliance on intergovernmental revenues (grants) will be eliminated or reduced. Any potential grants will be examined for matching and continuation of program requirements. These revenue sources should be used only for projects and programs where operating and maintenance costs that have been included in the financial forecast and their ultimate effect on operations and revenue requirements are anticipated. 8. REVENUE MONITORING. Revenues as they are received will be regularly compared to budgeted revenues and variances will be investigated. This process will be summarized in the appropriate budget report. IV. EXPENDITURE CONTROL A. APPROPRIATIONS. The point of budgetary control is at the department level in the General Fund and at the fund level in all other funds. When budget adjustments among Departments and/or funds are necessary, they must be approved by the City Council and must meet other requirements as outlined in the City Charter. Budget appropriation amendments at lower levels of control shall be made in accordance with the applicable administrative procedures. B. AMENDMENTS TO THE BUDGET. In accordance with the City Charter, the budget may be amended after the following conditions are met: 1. The City Manager certifies that there are available revenues in excess of those estimated in the Budget. 2. The City Council holds a public hearing on the supplemental appropriation. 3. The City Council approves the supplemental appropriation. F-4 Fiscal and Budgetary Policy Statements C. CENTRAL CONTROL. Modifications within the operating categories (salaries, supplies, maintenance, services, capital etc.) can be made with the approval of the City Manager. Modifications to reserve categories and interdepartmental budget totals will be done only by City Council consent with formal briefing and council action. D. PURCHASING. The City shall make expenditures to promote the best interests of the citizens of College Station. The City shall encourage free and unrestricted competition on bids and purchases, ensuring the taxpayers the best possible return on and use of their tax dollars. It shall be the policy of the City to fully comply with and make purchases or expenditures pursuant to the City’s Purchasing Manual which includes policies, rules, regulations, procedures, state and federal law. The Purchasing office, a division of Fiscal Services, is the central authority for all purchasing activity $3,000 and greater. The City Manager or his designee, in consultation with appropriate City Departments, may determine the procurement method for goods and services that provides the best value to the City. The purchase of goods or services by the City at a total cost of less than $3,000 may be approved by the applicable department in accordance with the department’s internal control procedures. E. PROMPT PAYMENT. All invoices approved for payment by the proper City authorities shall be paid within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of goods or services or invoice date, whichever is later, in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 2251 of the Local Government Code. The Chief Financial Officer shall establish and maintain proper procedures which will enable the City to take advantage of all purchase discounts, when possible, except in the instance where payments can be reasonably and legally delayed in order to maximize the City’s investable cash. F. RISK MANAGEMENT. The City will aggressively pursue every opportunity to provide for the Public’s and City employees’ safety and to manage its risks. The goal shall be to minimize the risk of loss of resources through liability claims with an emphasis on safety programs. All reasonable options will be investigated to finance risks. Such options may include risk transfer, insurance, and risk retention. Where risk is retained, reserves will be established based upon actuarial determinations and not be used for purposes other than for financing losses. G. REPORTING. Summary reports will be prepared showing actual expenditures as compared to the original budget and prior year expenditures. V. CAPITAL BUDGET AND PROGRAM A. PREPARATION. The City’s capital budget will include all capital projects funds and all capital resources. The budget will be prepared annually on a project basis. The capital budget will be prepared by the Office of Budget and Strategic Planning with the involvement of responsible departments. B. CONTROL. All capital project expenditures must be appropriated in the capital budget. The Chief Financial Officer must certify the availability of resources before any capital project contract is presented to the City Council for approval. C. PROGRAM PLANNING. The capital budget will be taken from the capital improvements project plan for future years. The planning time frame for the capital improvements project plan should normally be five years, with a minimum of at least three years. The replacement and maintenance for capital items should also be projected for the next five years. Future maintenance and operational costs will be considered so that these costs can be included as appropriate in the annual budget. D. FINANCING PROGRAMS. Where applicable, assessments, impact fees, pro-rata charges, or other fees should be used to fund capital projects which have a primary benefit to specific, identifiable property owners. F-5 Fiscal and Budgetary Policy Statements Recognizing that long-term debt is usually a more expensive financing method, alternative financing sources will be explored before debt is issued. When debt is issued, it will be used to acquire major assets with expected lives which equal or exceed the average life of the debt issue. E. REPORTING. Periodic financial reports will be prepared to enable the Department Directors to manage their capital budgets and to enable the Office of Budget and Strategic Planning to monitor and control the capital budget as authorized by the City Manager. Summary capital project status reports will be presented to the City Council monthly. VI. CAPITAL MAINTENANCE & REPLACEMENT The City recognizes that deferred maintenance and not anticipating capital replacements increases future capital costs. In order to address these issues, the City Council has approved a number of policies to address these issues. A. STREETS CAPITAL MAINTENANCE AND REPLACEMENT. It is the policy of the City to annually provide significant funding for the Streets Division within the Public Works Department to use for a residential street maintenance program. B. BUILDING CAPITAL MAINTENANCE AND REPLACEMENT. It is the policy of the City to annually provide significant funding for major maintenance on its buildings such as roof air conditioning, flooring and other replacements. C. PARKING LOTS AND INTERNAL ROADWAYS. It is the policy of the City to annually provide significant funding to pay for major maintenance of parking lots and internal roadways. D. TECHNOLOGY. It is the policy of the City to fund the maintenance and replacement of its personal computers and network servers. The funding is 10% of the original cost of the equipment and the software. Additionally, funding for integration solutions and upgrades to the mid-range systems is $90,000 annually. Major replacements for the computer systems including hardware and software will be anticipated for a five-year period and included with the capital projects lists presented in the annual budget. E. FLEET REPLACEMENT. The City has a major investment in its fleet of cars, trucks, tractors, backhoes, and other equipment. The City will anticipate replacing existing equipment, as necessary and will establish charges that are assigned to departments to account for the cost of that replacement. The replacement fund may be used to provide funding for new equipment providing a charge to departments that recovers the initial investment and lost opportunity costs and maintains the ability of the fund to provide for replacement of all covered equipment. F. RADIOS, COPIERS, OTHER EQUIPMENT, AND TELEPHONES. The City has a major investment in its radios, copiers, and telephone equipment. As a part of the on going infrastructure maintenance and replacement, the City has anticipated the useful life of such equipment and established a means of charging the cost of replacement of that equipment to the various departments in order to recognize the city’s continuing need. VlI. ACCOUNTING, AUDITING, AND FINANCIAL REPORTING A. ACCOUNTING. The City is solely responsible for the recording and reporting of its financial affairs, both internally and externally. The Chief Financial Officer is the City’s Chief Fiscal Officer and is responsible for establishing the structure for the City’s Chart of Accounts and for assuring that procedures are in place to properly record financial transactions and report the City’s financial position. B. AUDITING. 1. QUALIFICATIONS OF THE AUDITOR. In conformance with the City’s Charter and according to the provisions of Texas Local Government Code, Title 4, Chapter 103, the City will be audited annually by outside independent accountants (“auditor”). The auditor must be a CPA firm of regional reputation and must demonstrate F-6 Fiscal and Budgetary Policy Statements that it has the breadth and depth of staff to conduct the City’s audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS) and contractual requirements. The auditor must be registered as a partnership or corporation of certified public accountants, holding a license under Chapter 901 Texas Occupations Code, capable of demonstrating that it has sufficient staff which will enable it to conduct the City’s audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards as required by the City Charter and applicable state and federal laws. The auditor’s report on the City’s financial statements will be completed and filed with the City Secretary within 120 days of the City’s fiscal year end, and the auditor will jointly review the management letter with the City Council within 30 days of its receipt by the staff. In conjunction with their review, the Chief Financial Officer shall respond in writing to the City Manager and City Council regarding the auditor’s Management Letter, addressing the issues contained therein. The Council shall schedule its formal acceptance of the auditor’s report upon the resolution of any issues resulting from the joint review. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF AUDITOR TO CITY COUNCIL. The auditor is retained by and is accountable directly to the City Council and will have access to direct communication with the City Council if the City Staff is unresponsive to auditor recommendations or if the auditor considers such communication necessary to fulfill its legal and professional responsibilities. 3. SELECTION OF AUDITOR. The City will not require a periodic rotation of outside auditors, but will circulate requests for proposal for audit services at least every five years. Authorization for the City’s annual audit shall occur no less than 30 days prior to the end of the fiscal year. 4. CITY INTERNAL AUDITOR. Pursuant to Article III, Section 30 of the City Charter, the City map appoint an officer of the City to be the City Internal Auditor. The internal auditor will assist management in preventing, detecting and deterring fraud by monitoring the design and proper functioning of internal control policies and procedures. The internal auditor may conduct performance audits, special investigations, and special studies under the direction of the City Council or Audit Committee. C. FINANCIAL REPORTING. 1. EXTERNAL REPORTING. The City shall prepare a written Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) that shall be presented to the Council within 120 calendar days of the City’s fiscal year end. Accuracy and timeliness of the CAFR are the responsibility of City staff. The CAFR shall be prepared in accordance with GAAP and shall be presented annually to the Government Finance Officer’s Association (GFOA) for evaluation and consideration for the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting. If City staffing limitations preclude such timely reporting, the Chief Financial Officer will inform the City Council of the delay and the reasons therefore. 2. INTERNAL REPORTING. The Fiscal Services Department will prepare internal financial reports, sufficient to plan, monitor, and control the City’s financial affairs. Internal financial reporting objectives are addressed throughout these policies. VIII. ASSET MANAGEMENT A. INVESTMENTS. The Chief Financial Officer or the designee shall promptly invest all City funds with the depository bank in accordance with the provisions of the current Bank Depository Agreement or in any negotiable instrument authorized by the City Council under the provisions of the Public Funds Investment Act of 1987 as amended, and in accordance with the City Council’s approved Investment Policies. An investment report will be provided to the City Council quarterly. This report shall provide both summary and detailed information on the City’s investment portfolio. F-7 Fiscal and Budgetary Policy Statements B. CASH MANAGEMENT. The City’s cash flow will be managed to maximize the cash available to invest. Such cash management will entail the centralization of cash collections, where feasible, including utility bills, building and related permits and licenses, fines, fees, and other collection offices as appropriate. Periodic review of cash flow position will be performed to determine performance of cash management and conformance to investment policies. The underlying theme will be that idle cash will be invested with the intent to 1) safeguard assets, 2) maintain liquidity, and 3) maximize return. Where legally permitted, pooling of investments will be done. C. FIXED ASSETS AND INVENTORY. These assets will be reasonably safeguarded and properly accounted for, and prudently insured. A fixed asset of the City shall be defined as a purchased or otherwise acquired piece of equipment, vehicle, furniture, fixture, capital improvement, addition to existing capital investments, land, buildings or accessioned Library materials which has an original cost or value of at least $5,000 and a useful life of more than three years. All expenditures related to specific capital projects are exceptions to the rule. Assets owned by the electric utility will be capitalized in accordance with Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) guidelines. Furthermore, assets owned by either the water or wastewater utilities will be capitalized in accordance with the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) guidelines. The City’s fixed assets shall be reasonably safeguarded and properly accounted for and sufficiently insured. Responsibility for the safeguarding of the City’s fixed assets lies with the department director in whose department the fixed asset is assigned. The Fiscal Services Department shall maintain the permanent records of the City’s fixed assets including description, cost, department of responsibility, date of acquisition, depreciation and expected useful life. D. COMPUTER SYSTEM/DATA SECURITY. The City shall provide security of its computer/network system and data files through physical and logical security systems that will include, but not limited to, double back-to-back firewalls and a two-tier spam/virus protection system. The physical location of computer/network systems shall be in locations inaccessible to unauthorized personnel. IX. DEBT MANAGEMENT A. DEBT ISSUANCE. The City will issue debt only for the purpose of acquiring or constructing capital assets for the general benefit of its citizens and to allow it to fulfill its various missions as a city. Debt may be issued for the purposes of purchasing land or rights-of-way and/or improvements to land, for construction projects to provide for the general good, and for capital equipment. 1. GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS (GO’s). GO’s will be used only to fund capital assets of the general government and are not to be used to fund operating needs of the City. GO’s are backed by the full faith and credit of the City as well as the ad valorem tax authority of the City, to the extent allowed by law. The term of a bond issue will not exceed the useful life of the asset(s) funded by the bond issue and will generally be limited to no more than twenty (20) years. General obligation bonds must be authorized by a vote of the citizens of the City of College Station. 2. REVENUE BONDS (RB’s). RB’S will be issued to provide for the capital needs of any activities where the capital requirements are necessary for continuation or expansion of a service which produces a revenue and for which the asset may reasonably be expected to provide for a revenue stream to fund the debt service requirements. The term of the obligation should not exceed the useful life of the asset(s) to be funded by the bond issue and will generally be limited to no more than twenty (20) years. 3. CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION, Contract Obligations, etc. (CO’s). CO’s will be used in order to fund capital requirements that are not otherwise covered under either revenue bonds or general obligation bonds. Debt service for CO’s may be either from general revenues or backed by a specific revenue stream or streams or by a combination of both. Generally CO’s will be used to fund capital assets when GO’s and RB’s are not appropriate F-8 Fiscal and Budgetary Policy Statements and when authorized under law. The term of the obligation may not exceed the useful life of the asset(s) to be funded by the proceeds of the debt issue and will generally be limited to no more than ten (10) years, but may extend to twenty (20) years when the asset is of a nature that its anticipated useful life exceeds 20 years. B. METHOD OF ISSUANCE AND BIDDING PARAMETERS. 1. METHOD OF SALE. The City will use a competitive bidding process in the sale of bonds unless the nature of the issue warrants a negotiated bid. In situations where a competitive bidding process is not elected, the City will publicly present the reasons why, and the City will participate with the financial advisor in the selection of the underwriter or direct purchaser. 2. BIDDING PARAMETERS. The notice of sale will be carefully constructed so as to ensure the best possible bid for the City, in light of the existing market conditions and other prevailing factors. C. ANALYSIS OF FINANCING ALTERNATIVES. Staff will explore alternatives to the issuance of debt for capital acquisitions and construction projects. These alternatives will include, but not be limited to, 1) grants in aid, 2) use of reserves, 3) use of current revenues, 4) contributions from developers and others, 5) leases, and 6) impact fees. D. DISCLOSURE. Full disclosure of operating costs along with capital costs will be made to the bond rating agencies and other users of financial information. The City staff, with the assistance of financial advisors and bond counsel, will prepare the necessary materials for presentation to the rating agencies, will aid in the production of Preliminary Official Statements, and will take responsibility for the accuracy of all financial information released. E. FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. The City will maintain procedures to comply with arbitrage rebate and other Federal requirements. F. DEBT STRUCTURING. The City will issue bonds for 20 years or less, not to exceed the life of the asset acquired. The structure should approximate level annual debt service unless operational matters dictate otherwise or if market conditions indicate potential savings could result from modifying the level payment stream. Consideration of market factors, such as the tax-exempt qualification, minimum tax alternative, and so forth will be given during the structuring of long-term debt instruments. X. FINANCIAL CONDITIONS, RESERVES, AND STABILITY RATIOS A. OPERATIONAL COVERAGE. (NO OPERATING DEFICITS). The City will maintain an operational coverage of 1.00, such that current operating revenues will at least equal or exceed current operating expenditures. Deferrals, short-term loans, or one-time sources will be avoided as budget balancing techniques. Reserves will be used only for emergencies or non-recurring expenditures, except when balances can be reduced because their levels exceed guideline minimums as stated in Paragraph B, following. B. OPERATING RESERVES/FUND BALANCES 1. The unobligated fund balance in the General Fund should be at least 15% of the annual budgeted General Fund expenses. This percentage is the equivalent of 55 days expenditures. An additional amount of up to 3.0% should be maintained for extraordinary items or contingencies. Cash and investments alone should be equivalent to 30 days of operating expenditures. 2. The working capital (current assets less current liabilities) in the enterprise funds should be maintained at 15% of total operating expenses or the equivalent of 55 days. Cash and Investments alone should be equivalent to 30 days of operations. F-9 Fiscal and Budgetary Policy Statements 3. The Hotel Tax Fund fund balance should be at least 15% of the annual budgeted expenditures. -Adequate reserves are essential due to the nature of this revenue source and the reliance organizations have on this revenue source to maintain ongoing operations. 4. The Internal Service Funds will attain and retain fund balance/working capital balances appropriate for the fund. (a) Some funds such as Fleet Maintenance and Utility Customer Service need only a minimal working capital balance in order to meet the needs of the fund. (b) Other funds-such as the various insurance funds where risk is retained by the City in a self-insurance mode, a reserve will be established based upon an actuarial determination. Such reserve will be used for no other purposes than for financing losses under the insurance program. (c) The Replacement Fund will have a working capital balance that will provide resources to replace covered equipment when it is necessary to be replaced. The funds will be replenished based on anticipated life of equipment and adjusted based on changes in the costs the covered equipment. C. LIABILITIES AND RECEIVABLES. Procedures will be followed to maximize discounts and reduce penalties offered by creditors. Current liabilities will be paid within 30 days of the invoice date or on receipt of the goods or services, whichever is later. Accounts Receivable procedures will target collection for a maximum of 30 days from service, with any receivables aging past 90 days to go to a collection agency. The Chief Financial Officer is authorized to write-off uncollectible accounts that are delinquent for more than 365 days, if the proper delinquency procedures have been followed. D. CAPITAL AND DEBT SERVICE FUNDS. 1. Monies in the capital projects funds will be used within 36 months of receipt. Balances will be used to generate interest income to offset increases in construction costs or other associated costs. Capital project funds are intended to be expended. 2. Revenues in the General Debt Service Fund are stable, based on property tax revenues and transfers from other funds. Remaining balances are maintained to meet contingencies and to make certain that the next year’s debt service payments may be met in a timely manner. The fund balance should not fall below 81/3% (one month) of average budgeted expenditures (in line with IRS guidelines). XI. INTERNAL CONTROLS A. WRITTEN PROCEDURES. Wherever possible, written procedures will be established and maintained by the Chief Financial Officer for all functions involving purchasing, cash handling and/or accounting throughout the City. These procedures will embrace the general concepts of fiscal responsibility set forth in this policy statement. B. DEPARTMENT DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES. Each department Director is responsible for ensuring that good internal controls are followed throughout his or her Department, that all Fiscal Services Department directives or internal controls are implemented, and that all independent auditor internal control recommendations are addressed. Departments will develop and periodically update written internal control procedures. C. INTERNAL REVIEWS/AUDITS. The Accounting Division will complete a review/audit of any department or procedure as directed by the Chief Financial Officer. Audits of petty cash and cash receipts will be randomly scheduled and conducted on an annual basis. F-10 Fiscal and Budgetary Policy Statements City of College Station Land Area and Public Safety Statistics (as of October 2011) Date incorporated:October, 1938 Date first charter adopted:October, 1938 Date present charter adopted:May, 1992 Date of last charter amendment:November, 2008 Form of government:Council-Manager Elections: Number of registered voters in last municipal election:43,371 Number of votes cast in last municipal election:6,013 Percentage of registered voters voting in last municipal election:13.86% Miles of streets Lane Miles 958.41 Centerline Miles 463 Miles of Sanitary Sewer Line:313 linear miles Fire Protection Number of stations:5 Number of full-time employees:139 Police Protection Number of full-time employees:182 Number of patrol units:30 One jail facility with a capacity of:17 Year Square Miles 1938 2.00 1940 2.51 1950 2.91 1960 6.34 1970 16.00 1980 24.01 1984 28.47 1994 32.55 1995 38.14 1996 40.69 2003 47.22 2004 47.23 2008 49.60 2009 49.60 2010 49.60 2011 50.60 Area in Square Miles G-1 Miscellaneous Statistical Data City of College Station Population and Demographic Estimates Census 2011 + 96,666 Count 2010 93,857 2000 67,890 1990 52,456 1980 37,296 1970 17,676 1960 11,396 1950 7,925 Sex and Age Male 50.8% Female 49.2% Under 5 years ##4.8% 5 to 9 years ##4.2% 10 to 14 years ##3.6% 15 to 19 years ##16.6% 20 to 24 years ##32.9% 25 to 34 years ##14.8% 35 to 44 years ##7.6% 45 to 54 years ##6.2% 55 to 59 years ##2.6% 60 to 64 years ##2.0% 65 to 74 years ##2.7% 75 to 84 years ##1.5%y % 85 years and older ##0.5% Median Age 22.3 Race White ##77.2% Black or African American ##6.8% Hispanic or Latino ##14.0% American Indian and Alaska Native ##0.4% Asian ##9.1% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander ##0.1% Some other race 52 4.0% Two or more races ##2.4% Source for Above: Source: 2010 U.S. Census Bureau + Estimate based upon Certificates of Occupancies. Source: City of College Station, Department of Planning and Development Services. G-2 Miscellaneous Statistical Data (as of September 2011) TOTAL NUMBER NUMBER PERCENT YEAR LABOR FORCE EMPLOYED UNEMPLOYED UNEMPLOYED 2001 30,881 30,349 532 1.7 2002 31,941 31,315 626 2.0 2003 33,566 32,906 660 2.0 2004 36,745 35,116 1,629 4.4 2005 39,927 38,233 1,694 4.2 2006 40,182 38,490 1,692 4.2 2007 41,099 39,521 1,578 3.8 2008 43,729 41,888 1,841 4.2 2009 46,102 43,648 2,454 5.3 2010 47,301 44,488 2,813 5.9 *2011 49,136 46,048 3,088 6.3 Primary Labor Force for College Station 2001 ‐ 2011 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 30,000  35,000  40,000  45,000  50,000  Source: Texas Workforce Commission *2011 represents labor force and employment through September. **In 2005, the Bureau of Labor Statistics introduced a new methodology for calculating the unemployment rate. Along with the new calculation method, Robertson and Grimes county were added to the Bryan/College Station MSA. 0.0 1.0 2.0 15,000  20,000  25,000  2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total Labor Force % Unemployed G-3 Miscellaneous Statistical Data City of College Station Economic Characteristics Civilian Labor Force Occupations for College Station Civilian employed population 16 years and over:## Management, professional, and related occupations ##45.1% Service occupations ##17.2% Sales and office occupations ##24.6% Farming, fishing, and forestry occupations 72 0.1% Construction, extraction, maintenance and repair occupations ##6.2% Production, transportation, and material moving occupations ##6.9% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2007-2009 American Community Survey 3-year Estimate Income and Benefits for College Station (in 2009 Inflation-Adjusted Dollars) Households Less than $10,000 ##27.6% $10,000 to $14,999 ##7.8% $15,000 to $24,999 ##11.2% $25,000 to $34,999 ##8.2% $35,000 to $49,999 ##9.8% $50,000 to $74,999 ##13.2% $75,000 to $99,999 ##7.5% $100,000 to $149,999 ##7.1% $150,000 to $199,999 ##4.0% $200,000 or more ##3.6% Median household income (dollars) $29,414 Mean household income (dollars) $51,401 Families Less than $10,000 ##13.0% $10,000 to $14,999 ##4.8% $15,000 to $24,999 ##6.7% $25,000 to $34,999 ##8.2% $35,000 to $49,999 ##9.7% $50,000 to $74,999 ##15.8% $75,000 to $99,999 ##13.1% $100,000 to $149,999 ##13.2% $150,000 to $199,999 ##8.2% $200,000 or more ##7.2% Median household income (dollars) $63,461 Mean household income (dollars) $81,034 Non-family Households Median household income (dollars) $13,647 Mean household income (dollars) $24,132 Mean travel time to work 16.5 minutes Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2007-2009 American Community Survey 3-year Estimate G-4 Miscellaneous Statistical Data UNIVERSITY YEAR ENROLLMENT 2001 44,618 2002 45,083 2003 44,813 2004 44,435 2005 44,578 2006 45,380 2007 46,542 2008 48,036 2009 48 787 Texas A&M University Enrollment 2000 ‐ 2011 42,000 44,000 46,000 48,000 50,000 TAMU  Enrollment Established in 1876, Texas A&M University became the first public higher education institution in Texas. Today, more than 49,000 students are enrolled in one of 10 colleges and 75 departments. Texas A&M has the largest engineering school in the U.S. Research spending at the University recently topped $600 million per year. With such a unique past, Texas A&M University gives College Station great tradition. 2009 48,787 2010 49,129 2011 49,861 Source: Texas A&M News & Information, TAMU OISP 40,000 G-5 Miscellaneous Statistical Data City of College Station Principal Taxpayers (as of September 2011) Percent of 2011 Total Assessed College Station - Top 10 Taxpayers Type of Business Assessed Valuation Valuation Post Oak Mall - College Station LLC Retail Mall $55,414,060 1.02% College Station Hospital LP Medical 54,541,320 1.00% SHP - The Callaway House Apartments 46,305,230 0.85% Woodlands of College Station Apartments 40,940,710 0.75% JamesPoint Management Housing 39,938,660 0.73% BVP 2818 Place LP Apartments 39,710,800 0.73% SW Meadows Point LP Apartments 37,998,415 0.70% Weinberg, Isreal & David Alkosser Housing 37,820,430 0.69% Jefferson Enclave LP Apartments 37,581,280 0.69% Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust Retail 37,218,030 0.68% $427,468,935 7.84% Top 5 Commercial Taxpayers *Type of Business Assessed Valuation Valuation Post Oak Mall - College Station LLC Retail Mall $55,195,720 1.01% College Station Hospital LP Medical 53,351,260 0.98% Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust Retail 37,218,030 0.68% H-E-B Retail 29,009,330 0.53% Adam Development Properties LP Retail 23,453,200 0.43% $198,227,540 3.63% Top 5 Industrial Taxpayers *Type of Business Assessed Valuation Valuation Dealer Computer Services Inc Retail $22,059,220 0.40% O I Corporation Retail 8,384,070 0.15% AT&T Mobility LLC Telecommunications 4,553,490 0.08% Dallas MTA LP Telecommunications 3,035,840 0.06% Lawson Properties II LLC Retail 2,145,050 0.04% $40,177,670 0.74% Source: Brazos County Appraisal District *Taxpayers may own additional land that is not classified as commercial or industrial therefore the value is not picked up on the commercial and industrial value report. G-6 Miscellaneous Statistical Data Cit f Cll St tiCity of College StationCtyoCo ege Stat o CiPiConstruction Permits Last Ten Calendar YearsLast Ten Calendar Years CResidentialCommercial Construction Construction TotalConstructionConstructionTotal Number Number Number Year Value Value Value Number of Permits Number of Permits Number of PermitsYearValueValue Valueof Permits of Permits of Permits 2001 975 101,703,574 313 44,592,967 1288 146,296,541 2002 1207 107 907 265 307 38 926 808 1514 146 834 07320021207107,907,265 307 38,926,808 1514 146,834,073 2003 1127 138,484,780 315 49,408,634 1442 187,893,414 2004 985 100 504 006 366 114 543 138 1351 215 047 1442004985100,504,006 366 114,543,138 1351 215,047,144 2005 *1991 127,265,816 419 31,169,195 2410 158,435,011 2006 1048 126 249 768 410 57 162 203 1458 183 411 97120061048126,249,768 410 57,162,203 1458 183,411,971 2007 990 161,466,990 413 74,683,795 1403 236,150,785 2008 1131 164 494 779 346 154 313 994 1477 318 808 77320081131164,494,779 346 154,313,994 1477 318,808,773 2009 792 82,316,558 243 46,947,099 1035 129,263,657 2010 860 93 158 066 309 162 053 510 1169 255 211 576201086093,158,066 309 162,053,510 1169 255,211,576 350 000 0002500350,000,000 2500 300,000,000,, 20002000 250,000,000 ,,$d200 000 000 1500 e $ued200,000,000 1500 luessuVas Is150 000 000 al Vmits150,000,000 1000 otarm1000 ToPer100 000 000# P100,000,000  500 50 000 000 500 50,000,000  0 0 00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Res. Permits Comm. Permits Total Permit Value * NOTE: NOTE: R id ti l C t ti i l d Si l f il d lli D l d A t t ll id ti l d l l b f Residential Construction includes: Single family dwellings, Duplexes and Apartments as well as residential remodels, slabs, roofs, t/ dii lstorage/accessory, and swimming pools. Commercial Construction includes: Commercial new construction, slab, remodel, and addition, as well as Hotel/Motel/Inn, demolition and sign permits.gp * Overall in 2005, residential and commercial construction permits are higher than other years due to an increase in roofing permits Overall in 2005, residential and commercial construction permits are higher than other years due to an increase in roofing permits because of a hailstorm in CS.because of a hailstorm in CS. S Th Cit f C ll St ti Pl i d D l t S iSource:The City of College Station, Planning and Development Services G-7 Miscellaneous Statistical Data City of College Station  Parks and Recreation Facilities (as of October 2011) Recreation:1 57 26 4 1 1 30 1 36 1 2 76 1 1 3 1 1 5 4 Number of history walks/miles 1 1 1 2 1 6 1 8 10 34 36 34 12 4 Number of tennis courts (Includes 9 courts at A&M Consolidated HS 27 and 4 at Willowbranch Middle School) Parks: Facility Acres Facility Acres Anderson 8.94 Merry Oaks 4.60 Arboretum/Bee Creek 43.50 1.59 Billie Madeley 5.14 Oaks 7.50 Brison 9.20 Parkway 1.90 Brother's Pond 16.12 Pebble Creek 10.20 7.34 Raintree 13.00 Castlegate 8.26 Reatta Meadows 3.00 Castlerock 5.86 Richard Carter 7.14 Cemetery 18.50 Sandstone 15.21 Cemetery - Memorial & AFOH 56.50 Smith Tract 11.80 Conference Center 2.30 Sonoma 7.16 Cove of Nantucket 3.92 Southeast 66.68 Creekview 14.01 Southern Oaks 14.49 Crescent Pointe 5.00 Southwest 9.42 Cy Miller 2.50 Southwood Athletic Complex 44.70 Eastgate 1.80 Steeplechase 9.00 Edelweiss 12.30 Stephen C. Beachy Central 47.20 Edelweiss Gartens 13.60 8.81 Emerald Forest 4.59 Thomas 16.10 Gabbard 10.67 University 10.20 Georgie K. Fitch 11.30 Veterans Park & Athletic Complex 150.00 Hensel (TAMU) 29.70 W.A. Tarrow (includes Lincoln) 21.26 Jack and Dorothy Miller 10.00 Windwood 1.37 John Crompton 15.26 Wolf Pen Creek 47.17 Lemontree 15.40 Woodcreek 6.60 Lick Creek 515.54 Woodland Hills 14.40 Lions 1.50 Longmire 4.16 Luther Jones 1.80 Total Park Acreage Maintained: 1,405.21 (Includes both Cemeteries and Conference Center) 52 Total Number of batting cages Number of cricket fields Number of regional athletic parks Number of regional nature parks Number of cemeteries Number of libraries Number of disc golf courses Number of water features or ponds Number of nature trails Number of open play areas Number of picnic shelters, pavilions, & gazebos Number of jogging/walking trails Summit Crossing Northgate Carter's Crossing Number of softball/baseball fields (Includes practice fields) Number of conference centers Number of picnic units Number of gyms Number of volleyball courts Number of dog parks Number of exercise stations along park trails Number of parks with State of Texas Historic Markers Number of arboretums Number of memorials/memorial sites within parks Number of outdoor plazas Number of green rooms Number of recreation centers Number of soccer fields (Includes practice fields) Number of amphitheaters Number of playground units Number of basketball courts Number of swimming pools (Includes one CSISD-owned Natatorium) Number of spray parks Number of teen centers G-8 Miscellaneous Statistical Data City of College StationCity of College Stationy g College Station Utilities StatisticsCollege Station Utilities Statistics (as of October 2011)(as of October 2011) Utility Funds:Utility Funds: Electric Users (Units Served)38,255ect c Use s (U ts Se ed)38, 55 Average Electrical Consumption:65 049 732 kwh/moAverage Electrical Consumption:65,049,732 kwh/mo. Water Users (Units Served)37 596Water Users (Units Served)37,596 AWtC ti 301 399 /Average Water Consumption:301,399 mgw/mo.gp ,g Nb fElNumber of Employees:py Electric 68 5Electric68.5 Wt 29 5Water29.5 Sewer 49Sewer49 Water Capacity:Water Capacity: Nb fWll 9Number of Wells 9 Water Production Capacity 27 000 000Water Production Capacity 27,000,000 Number of Ground Storage Tanks 2Number of Ground Storage Tanks 2 Total capacity (gallons)8,000,000 Total capacity (gallons)8,000,000 Number of Elevated Storage Tanks 2Number of Elevated Storage Tanks 2 Total capacity (gallons)5,000,000 Total capacity (gallons)5,000,000 Miles of Water Lines 395Miles of Water Lines 395 Average Daily Water Use 11.4 Million GallonsAverage Daily Water Use 11.4 Million Gallons Electric System:y Maximum Demand 200 megawattsMaximum Demand 200 megawatts Number of Stations 6 Miles of Distribution Lines 440Miles of Distribution Lines 440 Sanitation Fund:Sanitation Fund: Number of Residential Tons Collected 13,223Number of Residential Tons Collected 13,223 Nb fC ilT Cll d 3 133Number of Commercial Tons Collected 35,133, RliT 1 168Recycling Tonnage 1,168 Clean/Green Tonnage 2 252Clean/Green Tonnage 2,252 Landfill size 20 acres at Twin Oaks LandfillLandfill size 20 acres at Twin Oaks Landfill G-9 Miscellaneous Statistical Data DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS G.O.B. SERIES 2002 MARCH 1, 2002 - PRINCIPAL $6,445,000 Streets - $3,781,000; Traffic Management/Signals - $720,000; Fire Station 5 - $250,000 Parks - $129,000; Drainage - $785,000; and City Center Land - $780,000 DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 6,445,000 2-15-12 300,000 4.500%6,750 306,750 8-15-12 - 0 306,750 3,540,000 Net Interest 616,128 H-1 Debt Service Schedules DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS G.O.B. SERIES 2003 - JULY 9, 2003 PRINCIPAL - $4,790,000 AT 3.75% INTEREST Streets - $973,000; Traffic Management - $720,000; City Facilities - $780,000 Fire Station 5 - $1,317,000; and Drainage - $1,000,000 DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 4,790,000 2-15-12 225,000 3.000%62,925 287,925 8-15-12 59,550 59,550 347,475 3,190,000 2-15-13 230,000 3.000%59,550 289,550 8-15-13 56,100 56,100 345,650 2,960,000 2-15-14 240,000 3.125%56,100 296,100 8-15-14 52,350 52,350 348,450 2,720,000 2-15-15 250,000 3.375%52,350 302,350 8-15-15 48,131 48,131 350,481 2,470,000 2-15-16 260,000 3.500%48,131 308,131 8-15-16 43,581 43,581 351,713 2,210,000 2-15-17 275,000 3.625%43,581 318,581 8-15-17 38,597 38,597 357,178 1,935,000 2-15-18 285,000 3.750%38,597 323,597 8-15-18 33,253 33,253 356,850 1,650,000 2-15-19 300,000 3.875%33,253 333,253 8-15-19 27,441 27,441 360,694 1,350,000 2-15-20 315,000 4.000%27,441 342,441 8-15-20 21,141 21,141 363,581 1,035,000 2-15-21 330,000 4.000%21,141 351,141 8-15-21 14,541 14,541 365,681 705,000 2-15-22 345,000 4.125%14,541 359,541 8-15-22 7,425 7,425 366,966 360,000 2-15-23 360,000 4.125%7,425 367,425 367,425 Total Interest:2,130,580$ H-2 Debt Service Schedules DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS G.O.B. SERIES 2004 AND REFUNDING PRINCIPAL - $12,940,000 Streets - $1,050,000; Traffic Signals and Safety System Improvements - $550,000; Police Station New addditon/Renovations - $3,310,000; City Centre Building $645,000 Park Facility Upgrades - $150,000; Fire Station #3 Relocation - $400,000 Drainage - $855,000; Refund Series 1991 - $750,000; Refund Series 1994 - $2,750,000; Refund Series 1995 - $2,650,000 DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 12,940,000 2-15-12 1,135,000 5.00%151,241 1,286,241 8-15-12 122,866 122,866 1,409,108 5,575,000 2-15-13 895,000 4.00%122,866 1,017,866 8-15-13 104,966 104,966 1,122,833 4,680,000 2-15-14 550,000 4.00%104,966 654,966 8-15-14 93,966 93,966 748,933 4,130,000 2-15-15 335,000 4.13%93,966 428,966 8-15-15 87,057 87,057 516,023 3,795,000 2-15-16 350,000 4.25%87,057 437,057 8-15-16 79,619 79,619 516,676 3,445,000 2-15-17 365,000 4.30%79,619 444,619 8-15-17 71,772 71,772 516,391 3,080,000 2-15-18 380,000 4.38%71,772 451,772 8-15-18 63,459 63,459 515,231 2,700,000 2-15-19 400,000 4.50%63,459 463,459 8-15-19 54,459 54,459 517,919 2,300,000 2-15-20 420,000 4.50%54,459 474,459 8-15-20 45,009 45,009 519,469 1,880,000 2-15-21 435,000 4.63%45,009 480,009 8-15-21 34,950 34,950 514,959 1,445,000 2-15-22 460,000 4.75%34,950 494,950 8-15-22 24,025 24,025 518,975 985,000 2-15-23 480,000 4.75%24,025 504,025 8-15-23 12,625 12,625 516,650 505,000 2-15-24 505,000 5.00%12,625 517,625 8-15-24 0 0 517,625 0 Total Interest:5,015,056 H-3 Debt Service Schedules DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS G.O.B. SERIES 2005 PRINCIPAL - $5,710,000 Streets - $2,997,000; Traffic Signals and Safety System Improvements - $553,000; Veteran's Park Phase II Development - $690,000; Park Facility Upgrades - $160,000; Fire Station #3 Relocation - $1,310,000 DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 5,710,0008-15-08 104,106 104,106 378,163 4,790,000 2-15-12 205,000 4.00%89,331 294,331 8-15-12 85,231 85,231 379,563 4,030,000 2-15-13 220,000 4.00%85,231 305,231 8-15-13 80,831 80,831 386,063 3,810,000 2-15-14 230,000 4.00%80,831 310,831 8-15-14 76,231 76,231 387,063 3,580,000 2-15-15 245,000 4.00%76,231 321,231 8-15-15 71,331 71,331 392,563 3,335,000 2-15-16 255,000 4.00%71,331 326,331 8-15-16 66,231 66,231 392,563 3,080,000 2-15-17 270,000 4.00%66,231 336,231 8-15-17 60,831 60,831 397,063 2,810,000 2-15-18 285,000 4.13%60,831 345,831 8-15-18 54,953 54,953 400,784 2,525,000 2-15-19 305,000 4.13%54,953 359,953 8-15-19 48,663 48,663 408,616 2,220,000 2-15-20 320,000 4.25%48,663 368,663 8-15-20 41,863 41,863 410,525 1,900,000 2-15-21 340,000 4.25%41,863 381,863 8-15-21 34,638 34,638 416,500 1,560,000 2-15-22 360,000 4.38%34,638 394,638 8-15-22 26,763 26,763 421,400 1,200,000 2-15-23 380,000 4.38%26,763 406,763 8-15-23 18,450 18,450 425,213 820,000 2-15-24 400,000 4.50%18,450 418,450 8-15-24 9,450 9,450 427,900 420,000 2-15-25 420,000 4.50%9,450 429,450 429,450 0 Total Interest:2,778,135 H-4 Debt Service Schedules DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS G.O.B. SERIES 2006 PRINCIPAL - $7,375,000 Streets - $1,300,000; Traffic Signals and Safety System Improvements - $240,000; Veteran's Park Phase II Development - $5,735,000; Park Facility Upgrades - $100,000; DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT ESTIMATED INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 7,375,000 2-15-12 250,000 6.375%131,131 381,131 8-15-12 123,163 123,163 504,294 5,440,000 2-15-13 265,000 4.375%123,163 388,163 8-15-13 117,366 117,366 505,528 5,175,000 2-15-14 280,000 4.375%117,366 397,366 8-15-14 111,241 111,241 508,606 4,895,000 2-15-15 295,000 4.375%111,241 406,241 8-15-15 104,788 104,788 511,028 4,600,000 2-15-16 315,000 4.375%104,788 419,788 8-15-16 97,897 97,897 517,684 4,285,000 2-15-17 330,000 4.375%97,897 427,897 8-15-17 90,678 90,678 518,575 3,955,000 2-15-18 350,000 4.375%90,678 440,678 8-15-18 83,022 83,022 523,700 3,605,000 2-15-19 370,000 4.500%83,022 453,022 8-15-19 74,697 74,697 527,719 3,235,000 2-15-20 390,000 4.500%74,697 464,697 8-15-20 65,922 65,922 530,619 2,845,000 2-15-21 410,000 4.500%65,922 475,922 8-15-21 56,697 56,697 532,619 2,435,000 2-15-22 435,000 4.500%56,697 491,697 8-15-22 46,909 46,909 538,606 2,000,000 2-15-23 460,000 4.625%46,909 506,909 8-15-23 36,272 36,272 543,181 1,540,000 2-15-24 485,000 4.625%36,272 521,272 8-15-24 25,056 25,056 546,328 1,055,000 2-15-25 515,000 4.750%25,056 540,056 8-15-25 12,825 12,825 552,881 540,000 2-15-26 540,000 4.750%12,825 552,825 552,825 0 Interest 3,778,792 H-5 Debt Service Schedules DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS G.O.B. 2006 Refunding PRINCIPAL - $10,255,000 DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 10,255,000 2-15-12 1,370,000 4.000%205,425 1,575,425 8-15-12 178,025 178,025 1,753,450 8,005,000 2-15-13 1,430,000 4.280%178,025 1,608,025 8-15-13 147,425 147,425 1,755,450 6,575,000 2-15-14 1,505,000 5.000%147,425 1,652,425 8-15-14 109,800 109,800 1,762,225 5,070,000 2-15-15 1,580,000 4.250%109,800 1,689,800 8-15-15 76,225 76,225 1,766,025 3,490,000 2-15-16 1,285,000 5.000%76,225 1,361,225 8-15-16 44,100 44,100 1,405,325 2,205,000 2-15-17 1,340,000 4.000%44,100 1,384,100 8-15-17 17,300 17,300 1,401,400 865,000 2-15-18 865,000 4.000%17,300 882,300 8-15-18 0 0 882,300 0 Interest 3,412,086 H-6 Debt Service Schedules DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS G.O.B. Series 2007 PRINCIPAL - $3,930,000 DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 3,930,000 2-15-12 100,000 5.500%57,541 157,541 8-15-12 54,791 54,791 212,331 2,405,000 2-15-13 110,000 5.500%54,791 164,791 8-15-13 51,766 51,766 216,556 2,295,000 2-15-14 115,000 5.500%51,766 166,766 8-15-14 48,603 48,603 215,369 2,180,000 2-15-15 120,000 5.000%48,603 168,603 8-15-15 45,603 45,603 214,206 2,060,000 2-15-16 125,000 4.250%45,603 170,603 8-15-16 42,947 42,947 213,550 1,935,000 2-15-17 135,000 4.250%42,947 177,947 8-15-17 40,078 40,078 218,025 1,800,000 2-15-18 140,000 4.250%40,078 180,078 8-15-18 37,103 37,103 217,181 1,660,000 2-15-19 150,000 4.250%37,103 187,103 8-15-19 33,916 33,916 221,019 1,510,000 2-15-20 155,000 4.375%33,916 188,916 8-15-20 30,525 30,525 219,441 1,355,000 2-15-21 165,000 4.375%30,525 195,525 8-15-21 26,916 26,916 222,441 1,190,000 2-15-22 175,000 4.500%26,916 201,916 8-15-22 22,978 22,978 224,894 1,015,000 2-15-23 185,000 4.500%22,978 207,978 8-15-23 18,816 18,816 226,794 830,000 2-15-24 190,000 4.500%18,816 208,816 8-15-24 14,541 14,541 223,356 640,000 2-15-25 200,000 4.500%14,541 214,541 8-15-25 10,041 10,041 224,581 440,000 2-15-26 215,000 4.500%10,041 225,041 8-15-26 5,203 5,203 230,244 225,000 2-15-27 225,000 4.625%5,203 230,203 230,203 Interest 1,554,288 Streets Projects: $2,700,000; Parks Projects: $1,230,000 H-7 Debt Service Schedules DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS G.O.B. SERIES 2008 PRINCIPAL - $9,455,000 Streets - $8,813,000; Traffic Signals and Safety System Improvements - $602,000; Park Projects $40,000; DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 9,455,000 2-15-12 290,000 5.000%165,659 455,659 8-15-12 158,409 158,409 614,069 7,305,000 2-15-13 305,000 5.000%158,409 463,409 8-15-13 150,784 150,784 614,194 7,000,000 2-15-14 320,000 5.000%150,784 470,784 8-15-14 142,784 142,784 613,569 6,680,000 2-15-15 340,000 4.000%142,784 482,784 8-15-15 135,984 135,984 618,769 6,340,000 2-15-16 355,000 4.000%135,984 490,984 8-15-16 128,884 128,884 619,869 5,985,000 2-15-17 375,000 4.000%128,884 503,884 8-15-17 121,384 121,384 625,269 5,610,000 2-15-18 395,000 4.000%121,384 516,384 8-15-18 113,484 113,484 629,869 5,215,000 2-15-19 410,000 4.000%113,484 523,484 8-15-19 105,284 105,284 628,769 4,805,000 2-15-20 435,000 4.125%105,284 540,284 8-15-20 96,313 96,313 636,597 4,370,000 2-15-21 455,000 4.125%96,313 551,313 8-15-21 86,928 86,928 638,241 3,915,000 2-15-22 480,000 4.250%86,928 566,928 8-15-22 76,728 76,728 643,656 3,435,000 2-15-23 505,000 4.250%76,728 581,728 8-15-23 65,997 65,997 647,725 2,930,000 2-15-24 530,000 4.375%65,997 595,997 8-15-24 54,403 54,403 650,400 2,400,000 2-15-25 555,000 4.500%54,403 609,403 8-15-25 41,916 41,916 651,319 1,845,000 2-15-26 585,000 4.500%41,916 626,916 8-15-26 28,753 28,753 655,669 1,260,000 2-15-27 615,000 4.500%28,753 643,753 8-15-27 14,916 14,916 658,669 645,000 2-15-28 645,000 4.625%14,916 659,916 659,916 0 Interest 4,273,914 H-8 Debt Service Schedules DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS G.O.B. SERIES 2009 PRINCIPAL - $3,335,000 Streets - $595,000; Traffic Signals and Safety System Improvements - $455,000; Park Projects $1,535,000; Fire Station #6 - $750,000 DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 3,335,000 2-15-12 110,000 3.500%63,604 173,604 8-15-12 61,679 61,679 235,283 3,025,000 2-15-13 120,000 3.500%61,679 181,679 8-15-13 59,579 59,579 241,258 2,905,000 2-15-14 120,000 3.500%59,579 179,579 8-15-14 57,479 57,479 237,058 2,785,000 2-15-15 130,000 3.500%57,479 187,479 8-15-15 55,204 55,204 242,683 2,655,000 2-15-16 130,000 3.500%55,204 185,204 8-15-16 52,929 52,929 238,133 2,525,000 2-15-17 140,000 3.500%52,929 192,929 8-15-17 50,479 50,479 243,408 2,385,000 2-15-18 155,000 3.500%50,479 205,479 8-15-18 47,766 47,766 253,245 2,230,000 2-15-19 155,000 3.700%47,766 202,766 8-15-19 44,899 44,899 247,665 2,075,000 2-15-20 160,000 3.900%44,899 204,899 8-15-20 41,779 41,779 246,678 1,915,000 2-15-21 175,000 4.000%41,779 216,779 8-15-21 38,279 38,279 255,058 1,740,000 2-15-22 180,000 4.050%38,279 218,279 8-15-22 34,634 34,634 252,913 1,560,000 2-15-23 195,000 4.050%34,634 229,634 8-15-23 30,685 30,685 260,319 1,365,000 2-15-24 200,000 4.300%30,685 230,685 8-15-24 26,385 26,385 257,070 1,165,000 2-15-25 210,000 4.300%26,385 236,385 8-15-25 21,870 21,870 258,255 955,000 2-15-26 220,000 4.500%21,870 241,870 8-15-26 16,920 16,920 258,790 735,000 2-15-27 225,000 4.500%16,920 241,920 8-15-27 11,858 11,858 253,778 510,000 2-15-28 250,000 4.650%11,858 261,858 8-18-28 6,045 6,045 267,903 260,000 2-15-29 260,000 4.650%6,045 266,045 266,045 0 Interest 1,646,531 H-9 Debt Service Schedules DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS G.O.B. SERIES 2009 (Refunding) PRINCIPAL - $8.095,000 Refunding of Series 1998 (GOB), 1999 (GOB), 2000 (GOB and CO) and 2000A (CO) DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 8,095,000 2-15-12 800,000 2.000%92,825 892,825 8-15-12 84,825 84,825 977,650 5,690,000 2-15-13 820,000 2.000%84,825 904,825 8-15-13 76,625 76,625 981,450 4,870,000 2-15-14 840,000 2.500%76,625 916,625 8-15-14 66,125 66,125 982,750 4,030,000 2-15-15 865,000 3.000%66,125 931,125 8-15-15 53,150 53,150 984,275 3,165,000 2-15-16 895,000 3.000%53,150 948,150 8-15-16 39,725 39,725 987,875 2,270,000 2-15-17 930,000 3.250%39,725 969,725 8-15-17 24,613 24,613 994,338 1,340,000 2-15-18 430,000 3.500%24,613 454,613 8-15-18 17,088 17,088 471,700 910,000 2-15-19 445,000 3.500%17,088 462,088 8-15-19 9,300 9,300 471,388 465,000 2-15-20 465,000 4.000%9,300 474,300 474,300 Interest 1,053,475 H-10 Debt Service Schedules DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS G.O.B. SERIES 2010 PRINCIPAL - $19,635,000 Streets - $12,525,000; Park Projects $870,000; Fire Station #6 - $6,240,000 DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 19,635,000 2-15-12 635,000 2.000%271,003 906,003 8-15-12 264,653 264,653 1,170,656 17,980,000 2-15-13 665,000 2.000%264,653 929,653 8-15-13 258,003 258,003 1,187,656 17,315,000 2-15-14 695,000 2.000%258,003 953,003 8-15-14 251,053 251,053 1,204,056 16,620,000 2-15-15 725,000 2.000%251,053 976,053 8-15-15 243,803 243,803 1,219,856 15,895,000 2-15-16 760,000 2.000%243,803 1,003,803 8-15-16 236,203 236,203 1,240,006 15,135,000 2-15-17 795,000 2.000%236,203 1,031,203 8-15-17 228,253 228,253 1,259,456 14,340,000 2-15-18 830,000 3.000%228,253 1,058,253 8-15-18 215,803 215,803 1,274,056 13,510,000 2-15-19 870,000 3.000%215,803 1,085,803 8-15-19 202,753 202,753 1,288,556 12,640,000 2-15-20 910,000 3.000%202,753 1,112,753 8-15-20 189,103 189,103 1,301,856 11,730,000 2-15-21 950,000 3.000%189,103 1,139,103 8-15-21 174,853 174,853 1,313,956 10,780,000 2-15-22 995,000 3.000%174,853 1,169,853 8-15-22 159,928 159,928 1,329,781 9,785,000 2-15-23 1,040,000 3.000%159,928 1,199,928 8-15-23 144,328 144,328 1,344,256 8,745,000 2-15-24 1,090,000 3.000%144,328 1,234,328 8-15-24 127,978 127,978 1,362,306 7,655,000 2-15-25 1,135,000 3.125%127,978 1,262,978 8-15-25 110,244 110,244 1,373,222 6,520,000 2-15-26 1,190,000 3.250%110,244 1,300,244 8-15-26 90,906 90,906 1,391,150 5,330,000 2-15-27 1,245,000 3.250%90,906 1,335,906 8-15-27 70,675 70,675 1,406,581 4,085,000 2-15-28 1,300,000 3.375%70,675 1,370,675 8-18-28 48,738 48,738 1,419,413 2,785,000 2-15-29 1,360,000 3.500%48,738 1,408,738 8-15-29 24,938 24,938 1,433,675 1,425,000 2-15-30 1,425,000 3.500%24,938 1,449,938 1,449,938 0 Interest 6,848,276 *Principal and interest payment amounts estimated prior to debt issue. Actuals received after proposed budget was submitted to Council. H-11 Debt Service Schedules DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS G.O.B. SERIES 2010 (Refunding) PRINCIPAL - $37,150,000 Refunding of Series DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 37,150,000 2-15-12 2,010,000 3.000%781,750 2,791,750 8-15-12 751,600 751,600 3,543,350 34,675,000 2-15-13 3,255,000 4.000%751,600 4,006,600 8-15-13 686,500 686,500 4,693,100 31,420,000 2-15-14 3,410,000 4.000%686,500 4,096,500 8-15-14 618,300 618,300 4,714,800 28,010,000 2-15-15 3,575,000 4.000%618,300 4,193,300 8-15-15 546,800 546,800 4,740,100 24,435,000 2-15-16 3,750,000 5.000%546,800 4,296,800 8-15-16 453,050 453,050 4,749,850 20,685,000 2-15-17 3,965,000 5.000%453,050 4,418,050 8-15-17 353,925 353,925 4,771,975 16,720,000 2-15-18 3,905,000 5.000%353,925 4,258,925 8-15-18 256,300 256,300 4,515,225 12,815,000 2-15-19 4,115,000 4.000%256,300 4,371,300 8-15-19 174,000 174,000 4,545,300 8,700,000 2-15-20 4,290,000 4.000%174,000 4,464,000 8-15-20 88,200 88,200 4,552,200 4,410,000 2-15-21 3,375,000 4.000%88,200 3,463,200 8-15-21 20,700 20,700 3,483,900 1,035,000 2-15-22 1,035,000 4.000%20,700 1,055,700 1,055,700 Interest 9,856,613 H-12 Debt Service Schedules DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS G.O.B. SERIES 2011 (Estimate)* PRINCIPAL - $1,960,000 Streets/Transportation Projects - $700,000; Parks and Recreation Projects - $1,260,000 DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 1,960,000 2-15-12 750,000 4.500%35,035 785,035 8-15-12 27,225 27,225 812,260 1,210,000 2-15-13 180,000 4.500%27,225 207,225 8-15-13 23,175 23,175 230,400 1,030,000 2-15-14 190,000 4.500%23,175 213,175 8-15-14 18,900 18,900 232,075 840,000 2-15-15 195,000 4.500%18,900 213,900 8-15-15 14,513 14,513 228,413 645,000 2-15-16 205,000 4.500%14,513 219,513 8-15-16 9,900 9,900 229,413 440,000 2-15-17 215,000 4.500%9,900 224,900 8-15-17 5,063 5,063 229,963 225,000 2-15-18 225,000 4.500%5,063 230,063 8-15-18 0 0 230,063 0 Interest 232,585 *Reflects principal and interest payment amounts estimated prior to debt issue. H-13 Debt Service Schedules DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS Certificates of Obligation, Series 2002 March 1, 2002 - Principal $14,480,000 City Facilities - $2,255,000; Wolf Pen Creek - $2,300,000 Street Projects - $8,891,000 Debt Issuance Cost $67,000 PAYMENT DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH FISCAL YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 2-15-12 600,000 4.50%13,500 613,500 8-15-12 0 0 613,500 0 Net Interest: 1,571,194$ Equipment and Technology - $967,000; H-14 Debt Service Schedules DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS Certificates of Obligation, Series 2003 A July 9, 2003 - Principal $780,000 Streets Project $750,000 Debt Issuance Cost $30,000 PAYMENT DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH FISCAL YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 780,000 2-15-12 35,000 3.000% 10,676 45,676 8-15-12 10,151 10,151 55,828 520,000 2-15-13 40,000 3.200% 10,151 50,151 8-15-13 9,511 9,511 59,663 480,000 2-15-14 40,000 3.400% 9,511 49,511 8-15-14 8,831 8,831 58,343 440,000 2-15-15 40,000 3.600% 8,831 48,831 8-15-15 8,111 8,111 56,943 400,000 2-15-16 40,000 3.700% 8,111 48,111 8-15-16 7,371 7,371 55,483 360,000 2-15-17 45,000 3.900% 7,371 52,371 8-15-17 6,494 6,494 58,865 315,000 2-15-18 45,000 4.000% 6,494 51,494 8-15-18 5,594 5,594 57,088 270,000 2-15-19 50,000 4.000% 5,594 55,594 8-15-19 4,594 4,594 60,188 220,000 2-15-20 50,000 4.150% 4,594 54,594 8-15-20 3,556 3,556 58,150 170,000 2-15-21 55,000 4.150% 3,556 58,556 8-15-21 2,415 2,415 60,971 115,000 2-15-22 55,000 4.200% 2,415 57,415 8-15-22 1,260 1,260 58,675 60,000 2-15-23 60,000 4.200% 1,260 61,260 61,260 Net Interest: 355,196$ H-15 Debt Service Schedules DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION SERIES 2004 PRINCIPAL - $9,415,000 Electric Projects $4,720,000; Wastewater Projects $4,000,000 Business Park $500,000, Debt Issuance $195,000 DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 9,415,000 2-15-12 400,000 4.00%150,826 550,826 8-15-12 142,826 142,826 693,651 6,380,000 2-15-13 415,000 4.00%142,826 557,826 8-15-13 134,526 134,526 692,351 5,965,000 2-15-14 430,000 4.00%134,526 564,526 8-15-14 125,926 125,926 690,451 5,535,000 2-15-15 450,000 4.13%125,926 575,926 8-15-15 116,644 116,644 692,570 5,085,000 2-15-16 470,000 4.25%116,644 586,644 8-15-16 106,657 106,657 693,301 4,615,000 2-15-17 490,000 4.30%106,657 596,657 8-15-17 96,122 96,122 692,779 4,125,000 2-15-18 510,000 4.38%96,122 606,122 8-15-18 84,966 84,966 691,088 3,615,000 2-15-19 535,000 4.50%84,966 619,966 8-15-19 72,928 72,928 692,894 3,080,000 2-15-20 560,000 4.50%72,928 632,928 8-15-20 60,328 60,328 693,256 2,520,000 2-15-21 585,000 4.63%60,328 645,328 8-15-21 46,800 46,800 692,128 1,935,000 2-15-22 615,000 4.75%46,800 661,800 8-15-22 32,194 32,194 693,994 1,320,000 2-15-23 645,000 4.75%32,194 677,194 8-15-23 16,875 16,875 694,069 675,000 2-15-24 675,000 5.00%16,875 691,875 691,875 0 Interest:4,733,745 H-16 Debt Service Schedules DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS Certificates of Obligation, Series 2005 Principal- $7,595,000 Street Projects $1,150,000; Park Projects$975,000; Northgate Projects $625,000 Technology Projects $950,000; Fire Ladder Truck $850,000; Business Park $500,000 Wolf Pen Creek Projects $1,860,000; Cemetery Projects $600,000; Issuance Costs $85,000 PAYMENT DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH FISCAL YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 7,595,000 2-15-12 195,000 3.50%60,869 255,869 8-15-12 57,456 57,456 313,325 2,740,000 2-15-13 205,000 3.50%57,456 262,456 8-15-13 53,869 53,869 316,325 2,535,000 2-15-14 215,000 4.25%53,869 268,869 8-15-14 49,300 49,300 318,169 2,320,000 2-15-15 230,000 4.00%49,300 279,300 8-15-15 44,700 44,700 324,000 2,090,000 2-15-16 160,000 4.00%44,700 204,700 8-15-16 41,500 41,500 246,200 1,930,000 2-15-17 170,000 4.00% 41,500 211,500 8-15-17 38,100 38,100 249,600 1,760,000 2-15-18 180,000 4.13% 38,100 218,100 8-15-18 34,388 34,388 252,488 1,580,000 2-15-19 190,000 4.13% 34,388 224,388 8-15-19 30,469 30,469 254,856 1,390,000 2-15-20 200,000 4.25% 30,469 230,469 8-15-20 26,219 26,219 256,688 1,190,000 2-15-21 215,000 4.25% 26,219 241,219 8-15-21 21,650 21,650 262,869 975,000 2-15-22 225,000 4.38% 21,650 246,650 8-15-22 16,728 16,728 263,378 750,000 2-15-23 235,000 4.38% 16,728 251,728 8-15-23 11,588 11,588 263,316 515,000 2-15-24 250,000 4.50% 11,588 261,588 8-15-24 5,963 5,963 267,550 265,000 2-15-25 265,000 4.50% 5,963 270,963 270,963 0 7,595,000 Net Interest: 2,129,607$ H-17 Debt Service Schedules DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS Certificates of Obligation, Series 2006 PRINCIPAL - $8,325,000 Street Projects $6,200,000; Park Projects $400,000; Wolf Pen Creek Projects $300,000; Cemetery Projects $1,000,000; Police Station Addition/Renovation $300,000; Issuance Costs $125,000 PAYMENT DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 8,325,000 2-15-12 345,000 4.500% 139,397 484,397 8-15-12 131,634 131,634 616,031 5,830,000 2-15-13 370,000 4.375% 131,634 501,634 8-15-13 123,541 123,541 625,175 5,460,000 2-15-14 390,000 4.375% 123,541 513,541 8-15-14 115,009 115,009 628,550 5,070,000 2-15-15 410,000 4.375% 115,009 525,009 8-15-15 106,041 106,041 631,050 4,660,000 2-15-16 435,000 4.375% 106,041 541,041 8-15-16 96,525 96,525 637,566 4,225,000 2-15-17 325,000 4.375% 96,525 421,525 8-15-17 89,416 89,416 510,941 3,900,000 2-15-18 345,000 4.375% 89,416 434,416 8-15-18 81,869 81,869 516,284 3,555,000 2-15-19 365,000 4.500% 81,869 446,869 8-15-19 73,656 73,656 520,525 3,190,000 2-15-20 385,000 4.500% 73,656 458,656 8-15-20 64,994 64,994 523,650 2,805,000 2-15-21 405,000 4.500% 64,994 469,994 8-15-21 55,881 55,881 525,875 2,400,000 2-15-22 430,000 4.500% 55,881 485,881 8-15-22 46,206 46,206 532,088 1,970,000 2-15-23 450,000 4.625% 46,206 496,206 8-15-23 35,800 35,800 532,006 1,520,000 2-15-24 480,000 4.625% 35,800 515,800 8-15-24 24,700 24,700 540,500 1,040,000 2-15-25 505,000 4.750% 24,700 529,700 8-15-25 12,706 12,706 542,406 535,000 2-15-26 535,000 4.750% 12,706 547,706 547,706 0 Interest 3,967,899 H-18 Debt Service Schedules DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS C.O. Series 2007 PRINCIPAL - $3,960,000 DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 3,960,000 2-15-12 105,000 5.500%58,009 163,009 8-15-12 55,122 55,122 218,131 2,420,000 2-15-13 110,000 5.500%55,122 165,122 8-15-13 52,097 52,097 217,219 2,310,000 2-15-14 115,000 5.500%52,097 167,097 8-15-14 48,934 48,934 216,031 2,195,000 2-15-15 120,000 5.000%48,934 168,934 8-15-15 45,934 45,934 214,869 2,075,000 2-15-16 130,000 4.250%45,934 175,934 8-15-16 43,172 43,172 219,106 1,945,000 2-15-17 135,000 4.250%43,172 178,172 8-15-17 40,303 40,303 218,475 1,810,000 2-15-18 140,000 4.250%40,303 180,303 8-15-18 37,328 37,328 217,631 1,670,000 2-15-19 150,000 4.250%37,328 187,328 8-15-19 34,141 34,141 221,469 1,520,000 2-15-20 155,000 4.375%34,141 189,141 8-15-20 30,750 30,750 219,891 1,365,000 2-15-21 165,000 4.375%30,750 195,750 8-15-21 27,141 27,141 222,891 1,200,000 2-15-22 175,000 4.500%27,141 202,141 8-15-22 23,203 23,203 225,344 1,025,000 2-15-23 185,000 4.500%23,203 208,203 8-15-23 19,041 19,041 227,244 840,000 2-15-24 195,000 4.500%19,041 214,041 8-15-24 14,653 14,653 228,694 645,000 2-15-25 205,000 4.500%14,653 219,653 8-15-25 10,041 10,041 229,694 440,000 2-15-26 215,000 4.500%10,041 225,041 8-15-26 5,203 5,203 230,244 225,000 2-15-27 225,000 4.625%5,203 230,203 230,203 Interest 1,566,714 General Government Projects: $3,466,000; Parks Projects: $405,000; debt issuance costs: $89,000 H-19 Debt Service Schedules DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS Certificates of Obligation, Series 2008 PRINCIPAL - $26,440,000 Street Projects $1,800,000; Park Projects $1,427,000; Cemetery Project $6,748,000; Municipal Facility Improvements $250,000; Wireless Infrastructure $200,000; Electric Projects $6,700,000; Water Projects $6,900,000; WW Projects $2,200,000; Issuance Costs $215,000 PAYMENT DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 26,440,000 2-15-12 900,000 3.500% 487,929 1,387,929 8-15-12 472,179 472,179 1,860,108 21,955,000 2-15-13 945,000 3.500% 472,179 1,417,179 8-15-13 455,641 455,641 1,872,820 21,010,000 2-15-14 995,000 3.500% 455,641 1,450,641 8-15-14 438,229 438,229 1,888,870 20,015,000 2-15-15 1,045,000 4.000% 438,229 1,483,229 8-15-15 417,329 417,329 1,900,558 18,970,000 2-15-16 1,060,000 5.000% 417,329 1,477,329 8-15-16 390,829 390,829 1,868,158 17,910,000 2-15-17 1,115,000 4.750% 390,829 1,505,829 8-15-17 364,348 364,348 1,870,176 16,795,000 2-15-18 1,170,000 4.000% 364,348 1,534,348 8-15-18 340,948 340,948 1,875,295 15,625,000 2-15-19 1,235,000 4.000% 340,948 1,575,948 8-15-19 316,248 316,248 1,892,195 14,390,000 2-15-20 1,300,000 4.125% 316,248 1,616,248 8-15-20 289,435 289,435 1,905,683 13,090,000 2-15-21 1,360,000 4.125% 289,435 1,649,435 8-15-21 261,385 261,385 1,910,820 11,730,000 2-15-22 1,435,000 4.250% 261,385 1,696,385 8-15-22 230,891 230,891 1,927,276 10,295,000 2-15-23 1,510,000 4.250% 230,891 1,740,891 8-15-23 198,804 198,804 1,939,695 8,785,000 2-15-24 1,585,000 4.375% 198,804 1,783,804 8-15-24 164,132 164,132 1,947,936 7,200,000 2-15-25 1,670,000 4.500% 164,132 1,834,132 8-15-25 126,557 126,557 1,960,689 5,530,000 2-15-26 1,750,000 4.500% 126,557 1,876,557 8-15-26 87,182 87,182 1,963,739 3,780,000 2-15-27 1,845,000 4.600% 87,182 1,932,182 8-15-27 44,747 44,747 1,976,929 1,935,000 2-15-28 1,935,000 4.625% 44,747 1,979,747 1,979,747 0 Interest 12,741,094 H-20 Debt Service Schedules DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS Certificates of Obligation, Series 2009 PRINCIPAL - $31,315,000 Cemetery Project - $540,000; Technology Projects - $2,710,000; Convention Center - $3,200,000; Landfill - $10,240,000; Electric Projects - $6,975,000; Water Projects - $7,500,000; Debt Issuance Cost - $150,000 PAYMENT DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 31,315,000 2-15-12 1,265,000 3.000% 538,967 1,803,967 8-15-12 519,992 519,992 2,323,959 26,205,000 2-15-13 1,325,000 3.000% 519,992 1,844,992 8-15-13 500,117 500,117 2,345,109 24,880,000 2-15-14 1,390,000 3.000% 500,117 1,890,117 8-15-14 479,267 479,267 2,369,384 23,490,000 2-15-15 1,470,000 3.000% 479,267 1,949,267 8-15-15 457,217 457,217 2,406,484 22,020,000 2-15-16 1,545,000 3.000% 457,217 2,002,217 8-15-16 434,042 434,042 2,436,259 20,475,000 2-15-17 1,145,000 3.500% 434,042 1,579,042 8-15-17 414,004 414,004 1,993,046 19,330,000 2-15-18 1,210,000 3.500% 414,004 1,624,004 8-15-18 392,829 392,829 2,016,834 18,120,000 2-15-19 1,270,000 3.750% 392,829 1,662,829 8-15-19 369,017 369,017 2,031,846 16,850,000 2-15-20 1,330,000 4.000% 369,017 1,699,017 8-15-20 342,417 342,417 2,041,434 15,520,000 2-15-21 1,405,000 4.000% 342,417 1,747,417 8-15-21 314,317 314,317 2,061,734 14,115,000 2-15-22 1,470,000 4.000% 314,317 1,784,317 8-15-22 284,917 284,917 2,069,234 12,645,000 2-15-23 1,545,000 4.125% 284,917 1,829,917 8-15-23 253,051 253,051 2,082,968 11,100,000 2-15-24 1,625,000 4.250% 253,051 1,878,051 8-15-24 218,520 218,520 2,096,571 9,475,000 2-15-25 1,715,000 5.000% 218,520 1,933,520 8-15-25 175,645 175,645 2,109,165 7,760,000 2-15-26 1,795,000 4.500% 175,645 1,970,645 8-15-26 135,258 135,258 2,105,903 5,965,000 2-15-27 1,890,000 4.500% 135,258 2,025,258 8-15-27 92,733 92,733 2,117,990 4,075,000 2-15-28 1,985,000 4.500% 92,733 2,077,733 8-15-28 48,070 48,070 2,125,803 2,090,000 2-15-29 2,090,000 4.600% 48,070 2,138,070 2,138,070 0 Interest 13,681,015 H-21 Debt Service Schedules DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS Certificates of Obligation, Series 2010 PRINCIPAL - $3,900,000 Arts Council of Brazos Valley Building - $520,000; Electric Projects - $2,530,000; Information Technology Projects - $410,000; Wastewater Projects - $300,000; Debt Issuance Cost - $140,000 PAYMENT DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 3,900,000 2-15-12 165,000 2.000%44,822 209,822 8-15-12 43,172 43,172 252,994 3,040,000 2-15-13 170,000 2.000%43,172 213,172 8-15-13 41,472 41,472 254,644 2,870,000 2-15-14 175,000 2.000%41,472 216,472 8-15-14 39,722 39,722 256,194 2,695,000 2-15-15 180,000 2.250%39,722 219,722 8-15-15 37,697 37,697 257,419 2,515,000 2-15-16 190,000 2.250%37,697 227,697 8-15-16 35,559 35,559 263,256 2,325,000 2-15-17 205,000 2.500%35,559 240,559 8-15-17 32,997 32,997 273,556 2,120,000 2-15-18 125,000 2.500%32,997 157,997 8-15-18 31,434 31,434 189,431 1,995,000 2-15-19 130,000 2.500%31,434 161,434 8-15-19 29,809 29,809 191,244 1,865,000 2-15-20 135,000 2.500%29,809 164,809 8-15-20 28,122 28,122 192,931 1,730,000 2-15-21 140,000 3.000%28,122 168,122 8-15-21 26,022 26,022 194,144 1,590,000 2-15-22 145,000 3.000%26,022 171,022 8-15-22 23,847 23,847 194,869 1,445,000 2-15-23 155,000 3.000%23,847 178,847 8-15-23 21,522 21,522 200,369 1,290,000 2-15-24 160,000 3.000%21,522 181,522 8-15-24 19,122 19,122 200,644 1,130,000 2-15-25 170,000 3.125%19,122 189,122 8-15-25 16,466 16,466 205,588 960,000 2-15-26 175,000 3.250%16,466 191,466 8-15-26 13,622 13,622 205,088 785,000 2-15-27 185,000 3.375%13,622 198,622 8-15-27 10,500 10,500 209,122 600,000 2-15-28 190,000 3.500%10,500 200,500 8-15-28 7,175 7,175 207,675 410,000 2-15-29 200,000 3.500%7,175 207,175 8-15-29 3,675 3,675 210,850 210,000 2-15-30 210,000 3.500%3,675 213,675 213,675 0 Interest 1,054,355 H-22 Debt Service Schedules DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS Certificates of Obligation, Series 2011 estimate* PRINCIPAL - $7,935,000 Electric Projects - $4,790,000; Wastewater Projects - $3,130,000; Gen'l Gov't Debt Issuance Costs - $15,000 PAYMENT DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 7,935,000 2-15-12 295,000 4.500% 141,838 436,838 8-15-12 171,900 171,900 608,738 7,640,000 2-15-13 265,000 4.500% 171,900 436,900 8-15-13 165,938 165,938 602,838 7,375,000 2-15-14 275,000 4.500% 165,938 440,938 8-15-14 159,750 159,750 600,688 7,100,000 2-15-15 280,000 4.500% 159,750 439,750 8-15-15 153,450 153,450 593,200 6,820,000 2-15-16 300,000 4.500% 153,450 453,450 8-15-16 146,700 146,700 600,150 6,520,000 2-15-17 315,000 4.500% 146,700 461,700 8-15-17 139,613 139,613 601,313 6,205,000 2-15-18 325,000 4.500% 139,613 464,613 8-15-18 132,300 132,300 596,913 5,880,000 2-15-19 340,000 4.500% 132,300 472,300 8-15-19 124,650 124,650 596,950 5,540,000 2-15-20 355,000 4.500% 124,650 479,650 8-15-20 116,663 116,663 596,313 5,185,000 2-15-21 370,000 4.500% 116,663 486,663 8-15-21 108,338 108,338 595,000 4,815,000 2-15-22 390,000 4.500% 108,338 498,338 8-15-22 99,563 99,563 597,900 4,425,000 2-15-23 405,000 4.500% 99,563 504,563 8-15-23 90,450 90,450 595,013 4,020,000 2-15-24 430,000 4.500% 90,450 520,450 8-15-24 80,775 80,775 601,225 3,590,000 2-15-25 445,000 4.500% 80,775 525,775 8-15-25 70,763 70,763 596,538 3,145,000 2-15-26 465,000 4.500% 70,763 535,763 8-15-26 60,300 60,300 596,063 2,680,000 2-15-27 490,000 4.500% 60,300 550,300 8-15-27 49,275 49,275 599,575 2,190,000 2-15-28 510,000 4.500% 49,275 559,275 8-15-28 37,800 37,800 597,075 1,680,000 2-15-29 535,000 4.500% 37,800 572,800 8-15-29 25,763 25,763 598,563 1,145,000 2-15-30 560,000 4.500% 25,763 585,763 8-15-30 13,163 13,163 598,925 585,000 2-15-31 585,000 4.500% 13,163 598,163 598,163 0 Interest 4,036,138 *Reflects principal and interest payment amounts estimated prior to debt issue. H-23 Debt Service Schedules DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS U.R.B. SERIES 2002 March 1, 2002 - PRINCIPAL $18,215,000 Electric Projects $4,440,000; Water Projects $6,300,000, Wastewater Projects $10,000,000 DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 18,215,000 2-15-12 850,000 6.00%25,500 875,500 8-15-12 0 0 875,500 0 Total Interest 1,890,591 H-24 Debt Service Schedules DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS U.R.B. SERIES 2003 REFUNDING December 5, 2002 - PRINCIPAL $11,160,000 REFUNDING URB SERIES 1993 YEARS 2004-2013, AND URB SERIES 1994 YEARS 2005-2014 Electric Projects; Water Projects, Wastewater Projects DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 2-15-12 1,055,000 4.00%58,703 1,113,703 8-15-12 37,603 37,603 1,151,306 1,800,000 2-15-13 1,035,000 4.13%37,603 1,072,603 8-15-13 16,256 16,256 1,088,859 765,000 2-15-14 765,000 4.25%16,256 781,256 781,256 Total Interest 2,799,655 H-25 Debt Service Schedules DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS U.R.B. SERIES 2003 A JULY 9, 2003 - PRINCIPAL $4,850,000 Electric Projects $4,850,000 DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 4,850,000 2-15-12 225,000 4.000%65,816 290,816 8-15-12 61,316 61,316 352,131 3,220,000 2-15-13 235,000 4.000%61,316 296,316 8-15-13 56,616 56,616 352,931 2,985,000 2-15-14 245,000 3.125%56,616 301,616 8-15-14 52,788 52,788 354,403 2,740,000 2-15-15 255,000 3.250%52,788 307,788 8-15-15 48,644 48,644 356,431 2,485,000 2-15-16 265,000 3.500%48,644 313,644 8-15-16 44,006 44,006 357,650 2,220,000 2-15-17 275,000 3.625%44,006 319,006 8-15-17 39,022 39,022 358,028 1,945,000 2-15-18 290,000 3.750%39,022 329,022 8-15-18 33,584 33,584 362,606 1,655,000 2-15-19 300,000 3.875%33,584 333,584 8-15-19 27,772 27,772 361,356 1,355,000 2-15-20 315,000 4.000%27,772 342,772 8-15-20 21,472 21,472 364,244 1,040,000 2-15-21 330,000 4.000%21,472 351,472 8-15-21 14,872 14,872 366,344 710,000 2-15-22 345,000 4.125%14,872 359,872 8-15-22 7,756 7,756 367,628 365,000 2-15-23 365,000 4.250%7,756 372,756 372,756 0 Interest:2,169,066 H-26 Debt Service Schedules DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS U.R.B. SERIES 2005 PRINCIPAL - $8,035,000 Electric Projects 3,350,000; Water Projects $4,600,000, Issuance Costs $85,000 PAYMENT DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 8,035,000 2-15-12 320,000 5.50%143,209 463,209 8-15-12 134,409 134,409 597,619 6,220,000 2-15-13 335,000 5.00%134,409 469,409 8-15-13 126,034 126,034 595,444 5,885,000 2-15-14 355,000 5.00%126,034 481,034 8-15-14 117,159 117,159 598,194 5,530,000 2-15-15 375,000 4.00%117,159 492,159 8-15-15 109,659 109,659 601,819 5,155,000 2-15-16 395,000 4.00%109,659 504,659 8-15-16 101,759 101,759 606,419 4,760,000 2-15-17 420,000 4.00%101,759 521,759 8-15-17 93,359 93,359 615,119 4,340,000 2-15-18 445,000 4.00%93,359 538,359 8-15-18 84,459 84,459 622,819 3,895,000 2-15-19 470,000 4.13%84,459 554,459 8-15-19 74,766 74,766 629,225 3,425,000 2-15-20 495,000 4.13%74,766 569,766 8-15-20 64,556 64,556 634,322 2,930,000 2-15-21 525,000 4.25%64,556 589,556 8-15-21 53,400 53,400 642,956 2,405,000 2-15-22 555,000 4.38%53,400 608,400 8-15-22 41,259 41,259 649,659 1,850,000 2-15-23 585,000 4.38%41,259 626,259 8-15-23 28,463 28,463 654,722 1,265,000 2-15-24 615,000 4.50%28,463 643,463 8-15-24 14,625 14,625 658,088 650,000 2-15-25 650,000 4.50%14,625 664,625 664,625 0 Total Interest:4,303,414 H-27 Debt Service Schedules DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS U.R.B. REFUNDING SERIES 2005 A PRINCIPAL - $12,995,000 Electric Projects $3,196,770; Water Projects $4,459,884; Wastewater Projects $5,338,346 PAYMENT DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 12,995,000 2-15-12 905,000 3.63%247,772 1,152,772 8-15-12 231,369 231,369 1,384,141 9,335,000 2-15-13 1,615,000 5.00%231,369 1,846,369 8-15-13 190,994 190,994 2,037,363 7,720,000 2-15-14 1,680,000 5.00%190,994 1,870,994 8-15-14 148,994 148,994 2,019,988 6,040,000 2-15-15 1,755,000 5.25%148,994 1,903,994 8-15-15 102,925 102,925 2,006,919 4,285,000 2-15-16 1,830,000 5.00%102,925 1,932,925 8-15-16 57,175 57,175 1,990,100 2,455,000 2-15-17 1,615,000 5.00%57,175 1,672,175 8-15-17 16,800 16,800 1,688,975 840,000 2-15-18 840,000 4.00%16,800 856,800 8-15-18 0 0 856,800 0 Total Interest:5,100,609 H-28 Debt Service Schedules DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS U.R.B. SERIES 2006 PRINCIPAL - $16,950,000 Electric Projects $7,850,000; Water Projects $6,000,000; Wastewater Projects $3,000,000; debt issuance costs $100,000 PAYMENT DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 16,950,000 2-15-12 630,000 6.375%332,575 962,575 8-15-12 312,494 312,494 1,275,069 13,650,000 2-15-13 665,000 5.250%312,494 977,494 8-15-13 295,038 295,038 1,272,531 12,985,000 2-15-14 705,000 4.375%295,038 1,000,038 8-15-14 279,616 279,616 1,279,653 12,280,000 2-15-15 745,000 4.375%279,616 1,024,616 8-15-15 263,319 263,319 1,287,934 11,535,000 2-15-16 785,000 4.375%263,319 1,048,319 8-15-16 246,147 246,147 1,294,466 10,750,000 2-15-17 830,000 4.375%246,147 1,076,147 8-15-17 227,991 227,991 1,304,138 9,920,000 2-15-18 875,000 4.500%227,991 1,102,991 8-15-18 208,303 208,303 1,311,294 9,045,000 2-15-19 925,000 4.500%208,303 1,133,303 8-15-19 187,491 187,491 1,320,794 8,120,000 2-15-20 975,000 4.500%187,491 1,162,491 8-15-20 165,553 165,553 1,328,044 7,145,000 2-15-21 1,035,000 4.500%165,553 1,200,553 8-15-21 142,266 142,266 1,342,819 6,110,000 2-15-22 1,090,000 4.500%142,266 1,232,266 8-15-22 117,741 117,741 1,350,006 5,020,000 2-15-23 1,155,000 4.625%117,741 1,272,741 8-15-23 91,031 91,031 1,363,772 3,865,000 2-15-24 1,220,000 4.625%91,031 1,311,031 8-15-24 62,819 62,819 1,373,850 2,645,000 2-15-25 1,285,000 4.750%62,819 1,347,819 8-15-25 32,300 32,300 1,380,119 1,360,000 2-15-26 1,360,000 4.750%32,300 1,392,300 1,392,300 0 Total Interest:9,437,445 H-29 Debt Service Schedules DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE OF REQUIREMENTS U.R.B. SERIES 2007 PRINCIPAL - $18,665,000 Water Projects $10,750,000; Electric $2,500,000; WW $5,300,000; issuance costs: $115,000 DATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INTEREST RATE INTEREST AMOUNT TOTAL DUE ON PAYMENT DATE TOTAL DUE EACH YEAR PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OUTSTANDING 18,665,000 2-15-12 665,000 5.75%373,589 1,038,589 8-15-12 354,470 354,470 1,393,059 15,620,000 2-15-13 705,000 5.00%354,470 1,059,470 8-15-13 336,845 336,845 1,396,315 14,915,000 2-15-14 740,000 5.75%336,845 1,076,845 8-15-14 315,570 315,570 1,392,415 14,175,000 2-15-15 780,000 5.75%315,570 1,095,570 8-15-15 293,145 293,145 1,388,715 13,395,000 2-15-16 825,000 4.00%293,145 1,118,145 8-15-16 276,645 276,645 1,394,790 12,570,000 2-15-17 865,000 4.10%276,645 1,141,645 8-15-17 258,913 258,913 1,400,558 11,705,000 2-15-18 915,000 4.20%258,913 1,173,913 8-15-18 239,698 239,698 1,413,610 10,790,000 2-15-19 965,000 4.30%239,698 1,204,698 8-15-19 218,950 218,950 1,423,648 9,825,000 2-15-20 1,015,000 4.30%218,950 1,233,950 8-15-20 197,128 197,128 1,431,078 8,810,000 2-15-21 1,070,000 4.40%197,128 1,267,128 8-15-21 173,588 173,588 1,440,715 7,740,000 2-15-22 1,125,000 4.40%173,588 1,298,588 8-15-22 148,838 148,838 1,447,425 6,615,000 2-15-23 1,190,000 4.50%148,838 1,338,838 8-15-23 122,063 122,063 1,460,900 5,425,000 2-15-24 1,250,000 4.50%122,063 1,372,063 8-15-24 93,938 93,938 1,466,000 4,175,000 2-15-25 1,320,000 4.50%93,938 1,413,938 8-15-25 64,238 64,238 1,478,175 2,855,000 2-15-26 1,390,000 4.50%64,238 1,454,238 8-15-26 32,963 32,963 1,487,200 1,465,000 2-15-27 1,465,000 4.50%32,963 1,497,963 1,497,963 0 Interest 9,822,342 H-30 Debt Service Schedules General and Administrative Transfers  The General and Administrative (G&A) transfers are used to reflect the cost of two types of activities, reimbursed administration costs and cost recovery. The first is to recover the costs of administrative services to the areas which are using those services. For example, transfers are used to reflect the cost of services received from administrative activities in the General Fund, such as accounting, purchasing, technology, and human resources services. Costs are allocated based on the results of an annual cost allocation plan done in the early part of the budget process. The transfers are also used as a mechanism to recover the cost of projects that may be budgeted in an operating fund, but are being funded from a different source. For example, the Parks and Recreation Department budgets for a number of activities that are funded from the Hotel Tax Fund through the General and Administrative transfer. The following page includes the schedule for the General and Administrative transfers for FY12. Most of the transfers come into the General Fund from other operating funds receiving General Fund services. Approximately $5.67 million is budgeted to be allocated to the General Fund from various other funds. This includes $121,808 for Community Development and $326,698 for parks related projects and special events funded out of the Hotel Tax Fund. Approximately $2.15 million is budgeted to be allocated to the Utility Customer Service Fund from the five utility funds. Funds are also transferred from the Water and Wastewater Funds to the Electric Fund for administrative services provided by the Electric Fund. I-1 General and Administrative Transfers 10/27/2011 15:45 FY11 FY12 FY12 Revised Base Approved Budget Budget Budget To General Fund: Community Development 102,484$ 121,808$ 121,808$ Hotel Tax 347,816 326,698 326,698 Drainage Operations 1,113,676 254,807 254,807 Electric 1,092,346 1,245,677 1,245,677 Water 675,286 743,491 743,491 Wastewater 581,702 652,861 652,861 Sanitation 419,104 475,100 475,100 Parking Enterprise 98,736 91,529 91,529 Police Seizure Fund 847 - - Memorial Cemetery Fund 2,764 - - Recreation Fund 186,861 171,059 171,059 Insurance Funds Employee Benefits 40,000 40,000 62,375 General Capital Projects Street Projects 377,517 368,924 368,924 Parks Projects 52,759 43,029 43,029 General Government 92,942 89,118 89,118 Parks Escrow Projects 19,513 26,373 26,373 Project Management 657,029 674,308 674,308 Utility Capital Projects Electric Projects 23,215 22,100 22,100 Water Projects 70,269 69,294 69,294 Wastewater Projects 70,299 69,294 69,294 Drainage 212,922 160,510 160,510 General Fund Total 6,238,087$ 5,645,980$ 5,668,355$ To Utility Customer Service: Electric 1,014,933$ 1,066,325$ 1,066,325$ Water 666,426 700,447 700,447 Wastewater 142,612 152,077 152,077 Drainage 71,306 76,038 76,038 Sanitation 142,612 152,077 152,077 Utility Customer Service 2,037,889$ 2,146,963$ 2,146,963$ To Electric Fund: Water 323,181$ 374,093$ 374,093$ Wastewater 302,199 345,811 345,811 Electric Fund Total 625,380$ 719,904$ 719,904$ Total All Funds 8,901,356$ 8,512,847$ 8,535,222$ FY12 Approved General and Administrative Transfer Worksheet I-2 General and Administrative Transfers Outside Agency Funding The City funds a number of outside agencies each fiscal year that provide services for the citizens of College Station. The amount of funding received by each agency depends on Council direction and the availability of funds. Agencies have been funded from various funds, including: General Fund, Community Development Fund, Hotel Tax Fund, and Sanitation Fund. City Council approved a resolution adopting a new Outside Agency Funding Policy in February 2007. This policy established four categories of Outside Agencies: Contract Partners, Department Budget Agencies, non-CDBG eligible Agencies, and CDBG eligible Agencies. Contract Partners are agencies that have been identified based on their economic impact and the community services provided to the City. The Contract Partner agencies are: the Convention and Visitors Bureau (CVB), The Research Valley Partnership (RVP), the Arts Council of Brazos Valley (ACBV), and the Brazos Valley Animal Shelter (BVAS). Department Budget Agencies are Agencies whose work directly supports the goals of a City Department. The Department Budget Agencies are: College Station Noon Lions Club, George Bush Presidential Library Foundation, Brazos Valley Veterans Memorial, and Keep Brazos Beautiful. During the preparation of the FY09 budget, agencies that were not eligible for CDBG funding went through an application process. These applications were reviewed by the Outside Agency Funding Review Committee (OAFRC) and the Committee’s recommendations were presented to Council for consideration. Since then, the City has not funded any new non-CDBG eligible agencies through the OAFRC process, and no OAFRC agency funding is included in the FY12 approved budget. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) eligible agencies go through a selection process through the Joint Relief Funding Review Committee (JRFRC). This committee is made up of members from College Station and Bryan. The JRFRC reviews all requests for CDBG Funds available for public agencies and makes recommendations to both cities on which agencies should receive funding. A total of $121,795 is included for CDBG eligible organizations listed on the following page. The RVP is an organization established to promote economic development in the area and is funded by the Cities of College Station and Bryan, and Brazos County. Funding for the RVP in the amount of $325,000 is budgeted for FY12 from the General Fund. Additionally, $100,550 is included for ACBV operations and maintenance funding. $10,000 is budgeted for agency funding from the General Fund for the Noon Lions Club. This $10,000 will be provided to the Noon Lions Club for the costs associated with the annual community 4th of July celebration. General Fund Outside Agency funding also includes $326,500 for the Brazos County Health District , $191,266 for the Brazos Valley Animal Shelter, and $1,000 for the Brazos Valley Council of Governments. Outside Agency funding from the Hotel Tax Fund is approved in the amount of $1,303,000. Outside Agencies receiving funding from the Hotel Tax Fund include the Bryan/College Station Convention & Visitors Bureau, the Arts Council of Brazos Valley, the George Bush Presidential Library Foundation, the Bryan-College Station Chamber of Commerce, and the Brazos Valley Veterans Memorial. SLA Funding in the amount of $50,000 is included for Outside Agency expenditures. Funding for the George Bush Library will increase by $25,000 to $50,000 for increased marketing in the Houston metro area as well as the American Airlines in-flight magazine. Finally, $25,000 in SLA funding is included for funding design and construction of additional war memorials along the Lynn Stuart Pathway at Veterans Park. Keep Brazos Beautiful funding is approved for $50,240 from the Sanitation Fund. This funding includes $33,240 for operations and maintenance and $17,000 for beautification grants and sponsorships. Keep Brazos Beautiful promotes litter abatement and beautification programs throughout the Brazos Valley thus supporting one of the Sanitation Department’s objectives. Total outside agency funding by the City of College Station is $2,407,598 in FY12. J-1 Outside Agency Funding City of College Station FY12 Approved Outside Agency Funding FY10 FY11 FY12 FY12 Total Total Base Total Approved Approved Approved Approved GENERAL FUND DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER ** 5,000$ ** 2,500$ ** -$ -$ RESEARCH VALLEY PARTNERSHIP 300,000 300,000 325,000 325,000 TEXAS COOPERATIVE WILDLIFE COLLECTION ** 2,383 ** 1,192 ** - - ARTS COUNCIL OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE 100,000 75,000 100,550 100,550 CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE BRAZOS VALLEY ** 7,500 ** - ** - - NOON LIONS CLUB - 4TH OF JULY 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 BRAZOS ANIMAL SHELTER 71,214 169,513 169,513 169,513 SISTER CITIES ** 2,500 ** 1,250 ** - BRAZOS CO. HEALTH DISTRICT 351,500 351,500 326,500 326,500 BRAZOS VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS - 1,000 1,000 1,000 850,097$ 911,955$ 932,563$ 932,563$ HOTEL TAX FUND ARTS COUNCIL OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE 108,000$ 89,000$ -$ -$ ARTS COUNCIL AFFILIATE FUNDING 181,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU (CVB)1,107,000 1,057,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 BUSH PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY FOUNDATION 50,000 - 25,000 50,000 B/CS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE - - 25,000 25,000 NORTHGATE DISTRICT ASSOCIATION - - 3,000 3,000 VETERANS MEMORIAL 10,000 - - 25,000 1,456,000$ 1,346,000$ 1,253,000$ 1,303,000$ SANITATION FUND KEEP BRAZOS BEAUTIFUL 60,240$ 50,240$ 50,240$ 50,240$ 60,240$ 50,240$ 50,240$ 50,240$ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL TEXAS 12,000$ 12,000$ -$ -$ BRAZOS FOOD BANK - 22,325 - - BRAZOS VALLEY REHABILITATION CENTER 14,000 - 26,891 26,891 BRAZOS MATERNAL & CHILD HEALTH CLINIC 22,000 25,000 - - CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEPARTMENT PROGRAMS 34,800 38,800 - - HEALTH FOR ALL 17,220 - - - JUNCTION FIVE-O-FIVE - - - - MHMR AUTHORITY OF BRAZOS VALLEY 2,773 29,873 25,961 25,961 PROJECT UNITY - - 9,583 9,583 RAPE CRISIS CENTER 18,500 12,380 - - SCOTTY'S HOUSE 17,224 - - - TCM - THE BRIDGE 30,896 - 29,934 29,934 VOICES FOR CHILDREN - 23,716 29,426 29,426 169,413$ 164,094$ 121,795$ 121,795$ TOTAL AGENCY FUNDING 2,535,750$ 2,472,289$ 2,357,598$ 2,407,598$ * estimate from BCAD ** Recommendations from FY09 Outside Agency Funding Review Committee (OAFRC) J-2 Outside Agency Funding Glossary of Terms     CAFR: Comprehensive Annual Financial Report CDBG: Community Development Block Grant CIP: Capital Improvement Program CO: Certificates of Obligation FTE: Full-time equivalent FY: Fiscal Year GAAP: Generally Accepted Accounting Principles GFOA: Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada. GIS: Geographical Information System GASB: Governmental Accounting Standards Board GOB: General Obligation Bonds ARRA: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 SLA: Service Level Adjustment O&M: Operations and Maintenance   A  Account: A separate financial reporting unit for budgeting, management, or accounting purposes. Accrual Basis of Accounting: A method of accounting in which revenues are recorded when measurable and earned, and expenses are recognized when a good or service is used. Activity Center: The lowest level at which costs for operations are maintained. Ad Valorem Tax: A tax based on the value of property. Appropriation: A legal authorization granted by the Council to make or incur expenditures/expenses for specific purposes. Audit: An examination, usually by an official or private accounting firm retained by the council, which reports on the accuracy of the annual financial report prepared by the accounting department. B  Balanced Budget: A balanced budget indicates that there is no budget shortage or budget surplus present during a specific time period. Base Budget: A budget process in which departments are provided with a maximum level for their annual budget requests. The budget office requires separate justification for proposed spending levels that exceed the target which are submitted as Service Level Adjustments (SLAs). Bond: A promise to repay borrowed money on a particular date, often ten or twenty years into the future, generally to obtain long-term financing for capital projects. Budget: A plan, approved by the Council, of financial operation embodying an estimate of proposed expenditures/expenses for the fiscal year and the proposed means of funding these expenditure estimates. Budget Amendment: A revision of the adopted budget that, when approved by the council, replaces the original budget appropriation. Budget Calendar: A timetable showing when particular tasks must be completed in order for the council to approve the spending plan before the beginning of the next fiscal year. Budgetary Control: The control or management of a government or enterprise in accordance with an approved budget to keep expenditures within the limitations of available appropriations and available revenues. C  Capital Budget: A spending plan for improvements to or acquisition of land, facilities, and infrastructure. K-1 Glossary Capital Improvement Program (CIP): A multi-year program of projects that addresses repair and replacement of existing infrastructure, as well as development of new facilities to accommodate future growth. Capital/Major Project Expenditure/Expense: An expenditure/expense that results in the acquisition or addition of a fixed asset or the improvement to an existing fixed asset. Major capital expenditures are more than $50,000 and provide a fixed asset or equipment that has a useful life of three years or more. Minor capital expenditures are more than $5,000 and less than $50,000 and provide a fixed asset or equipment that has a useful life of three years or more. Capital Outlay: A disbursement of money which results in the acquisition or addition to fixed assets. Capital Projects Funds: Funds used to account for and report financial resources that are restricted, committed, or assigned to expenditure for capital outlays including the acquisition or construction of capital facilities and other capital assets. Cash Basis: Method of accounting and budgeting that recognizes revenues when received and expenditures when paid. Certificate of Obligation (CO): Long-term debt that is authorized by the City Council and does not require prior voter approval. Charter of Accounts: A chart detailing the system of general ledger accounts. City Council: The current elected officials of the City as set forth in the City's Charter. City Manager: The individual appointed by City Council who is responsible for the administration of City affairs. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR): The published results of the City’s annual audit. Competitive bidding process: The process following Until August 31, 2007, state law requiring that for purchases of $15,000 or more, a city must advertise, solicit, and publicly open sealed bids from prospective vendors. After a review period, the Council then awards the bid to the successful bidder. Effective September 1, 2007, the statutory limit increased to $50,000. Contingency: A budgeted appropriation within a fund for unanticipated expenditure requirements. Contract Obligation Bonds: Long-term debt that places the assets purchased or constructed as a part of the security for the issue. Current Expense: An obligation as a result of an incurred expenditure/expense due for payment within a twelve (12) month period. Current Revenue: The revenues or resources of a City convertible to cash within a twelve (12) month period. D  Debt Service: The annual amount of money necessary to pay the interest and principal (or sinking fund contribution) on outstanding debt. Deficit: The excess of expenditures over revenues during an accounting period. Department: Separate branch of operation in the organization structure. Division: Unit of a department. E  Effective Tax Rate: The effective tax rate is the rate that will raise the same revenues on the same properties this year as last year. Effectiveness Measure: Measure that demonstrates whether a program is accomplishing its intended results. These should show the impact of the program. Efficiency Measure: This is a ratio of inputs to outputs. For example: cost per inspection, calls for service per officer. K-2 Glossary Emergency: An unexpected occurrence, i.e., damaging weather conditions that require the unplanned use of City funds. Encumbrance: Obligation to expend appropriated monies as a result of a processed purchase order or a contract for purchases legally entered on behalf of the City. Enterprise Funds: Funds that are used to represent the economic results of activities that are maintained similar to those of private business, where revenues are recorded when earned and expenses are recorded as resources are used. Equity: See Fund Balance. Expenditure/Expense: Decrease in net financial resources for the purpose of acquiring goods or services. The General Fund recognizes expenditures and the Proprietary Funds recognize expenses. F  Fiscal Year: A twelve month reporting period, for the City of College Station, the fiscal year is from October 1st through the following September 30th. Fixed Assets: Asset of a long-term nature which is intended to continue to be held or used, such as land, building, improvements other than buildings, machinery, and equipment. Full Time Equivalent: A position that is equivalent to a full-time 40 hour work week. This is the method by which full-time, part-time, and temporary/seasonal employees are accounted for. Fund: An independent fiscal and accounting entity with a self-balancing set of accounts recording cash and/or other resources together with all related liabilities, obligations, reserves, and equities which are segregated for the purpose of carrying on specific activities or attaining certain objectives. Fund Balance (Equity): The excess of fund assets over liabilities. Accumulated balances are the result of continual excess of revenues over expenditures/expenses. A negative fund balance is a deficit balance. G  General and Administrative Costs: Costs associated with the administration of City services. General Fund: The City fund used to account for all financial resource and expenditures of the City except those required to be accounted for in another fund. General Ledger: The collection of accounts reflecting the financial position and results of operations for the City. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP): Uniform minimum standards of and guidelines to financial accounting and reporting as set forth by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). General Obligation (GO) Bonds: Bonds for whose payment the full faith and credit of the City has been pledged. Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB): The authoritative accounting and financial reporting standard- setting body of government agencies. Governmental Funds: Funds that are maintained on a modified accrual basis with an emphasis on when cash is expended or obligated and revenues are recorded when measurable and available. Grant: A payment of money from one governmental unit to another or from a governmental unit to a not-for-profit agency for a specific program or purpose. I  Interfund Borrowing: A transfer of money from a fund that has a surplus to a fund that has a temporary revenue shortfall. Interfund Transfer: The transfer of money from one fund to another in a governmental unit. Internal Service Funds: Generally accounted for similar to enterprise funds. These funds are used to account for enterprise types of activities for the benefit of city departments such as fleet maintenance, self insurance, and print/mail. K-3 Glossary Implementation Plan: The specific actions that will be taken to implement a strategy within the City’s strategic plan. Investments: Securities held for the production of income, generally in the form of interest. L  Line Item Budget: The presentation of the City's adopted budget in a format presenting each Department's approved expenditure/expense by specific account. Long-Term Debt: Obligation of the City with a remaining maturity term of more that one (1) year. M  Major Funds: Any governmental fund that has revenues, expenditures, assets and/or liabilities that constitute more than 10% of the revenues, expenditures, assets, or liabilities of the total governmental funds budget. Additionally, the fund must be 5% of the total revenues, expenditures, assets and/or liabilities for the combined governmental funds and enterprise funds budget. Any fund the government feels is of considerable importance to financial statement readers may also be designated as a major fund. Mission Statement: Purpose of the organization; why the organization exists and whom it benefits. Modified Accrual Basis of Accounting: The basis of accounting in which revenues are recognized when they become measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. Expenditures are recognized when the goods or services are received. N  Net Working Capital: Current Assets less Current Liabilities in an enterprise or internal service fund. Non-Recurring Revenues: Resources recognized by the City that are unique and occur only one time or without pattern. O  Official Budget: The budget as adopted by Council. One-Time Revenues: See Non-Recurring Revenues. Operating Budget: A plan, approved by the Council, of financial operations embodying an estimate of proposed expenditures/expenses for the fiscal year and the proposed means of financing them. Output Measure: This is the quantity of work produced or generated. P  Performance Measure: Tool to determine the levels of service are being provided by the organization. Proprietary Funds: See Enterprise Funds. Public Hearing: An open meeting regarding proposed operating or capital budget allocations, which provides the citizens with an opportunity to voice their views on the merits of the proposals. R  Reserves: An account used to designate a portion of the fund balance (equity) as legally segregated for a specific future use. Retained Earnings: The equity account reflecting the accumulated earnings of the Utility Funds. Revenues (Resources): An increase in assets due to the performance of a service or the sale of goods. In the General Fund, revenues are recognized when earned, measurable, and reasonably assured to be received within 60 days. Risk: The liability, either realized or potential, related to the City's daily operations. K-4 Glossary Rollback rate: The rollback rate is the highest rate that can be adopted before citizens can initiate a petition to rollback the tax rate to the rollback rate. S  Service Level: The current outcomes and services provided to citizens and customers by the City as approved in the annual budget. Service Level Adjustment (SLA): Request for additional resources requiring a decision by management and council and justified on the basis of adding to or reducing services and/or performance improvements. Sinking Fund: A fund which is accumulated through periodic contributions which must be placed in the sinking fund so that the total contributions plus their compounded earnings will be sufficient to redeem the sinking fund bonds when they mature. Special Revenue Fund: A fund used to account for revenues legally earmarked for a specific purpose used to account for and report the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are restricted or committed to expenditure for specific purposes other than debt service or capital projects. Strategy: A policy choice that identifies purposes, policies, programs, actions, decisions, or resource allocations that define what path the City will take to move toward the visions and why that path has been chosen. T  Tax Levy: The total amount of taxes imposed by the City on taxable property, as determined by the Brazos County Appraisal District, within the City's corporate limits. Transfers: A legally authorized funding transfer between funds in which one fund is responsible for the initial receipt and the other fund is responsible for the actual disbursement. User-Based Fee/Charge: A monetary fee or charge placed upon the user of services of the City. U  Utility Funds: The funds used to account for the operations of the City's electric, water, sanitary sewer, and solid waste disposal activities. Undesignated Fund Balance: The portion of the fund balance that is unencumbered from any obligation of the City. Utility Revenue Bond: Debt issued by the City and approved by the Council for which payment is secured by pledged utility revenue. W  Working Capital: Current Assets – Current Liabilities = Working Capital. K-5 Glossary