The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity of College Station Water Production & Water Distribution Scrapbook00 [N Water Production Water Distribution 1� �pq REGION 6 1991 EPA Environmental Excellence Award BRYAN—COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS HISTORY OF COLLEGE STATION The City of College Station, incorporated in 1938, is a young municipality, but its community began when the Texas A&M College was founded. As the first state institution of higher education, it was inaugurated in 1876 and was located four miles south of the City of Bryan amid DALLAS sparsely settled farmland. F T . WORTH • • Because of the school's isolation, school administrators provided facilities on its campus for those who were associated with the college. The campus became the focal point of the community and its development. The area was designated "College Station, Texas" by the Postal Service in 1877. The name derived from the train station located to the west of the campus. The integration of the community and the college influenced the development and future of the municipality. College Station was incorporated in 1938, when the University had grown to the point that school officials could no longer furnish the necessary facilties for those who lived on campus. — -I \1% Lo Sots 07 l �9✓ <P V VITAL STATISTICS The City of College Station encompases 17,737.65 acres, 3,211 of which comprises the campus of Texas A&M University. The population of College Station, as of the 1990 census, is 52,456. Of this number 27,000 are students at the University. N �� WACO • BRYAN J COLLEGE AUSTIN • STATION • ,✓j • HOUSTON SAN ANTONIO. J LEGE STATION 1 9 9 1 P R O J E C T S Waterline Sewerline JAN (feet) (feet) FEB Albertson's 689.67 1578.69 Randall's 1728. 361. MAR Emerald Forest Phase 8 0. 376.56 Stonebrook Drive 0. 0. APR Callie Circle 183.20 72.52 MAY Chili's Sprinkler Vault 25, 0, Glade Section 12 185.50 0. Pebble Creek Golf Course 871.62 1271.24 Woodcreek Sections 4 and 5 3761.67 3518.21 Ponderosa Place Section 2, Tract A 214.40 JUN Dexter Street 0. 0. Wolf Pen Creek Park 0. 2264.11 JUL Brandon Heights Phase 2 7454.30 4132.51 HEB Pantry 1532.89 432. James Coney Island 0. 0. SAM'S 2256. 794.36 AUG SEP OCT Landfill: Waterline 327.98 0. Totals as of October 23 19230.23 14801.20 r ♦ � of w 91 WATER SERVICES College Station Water System Historical Information Prior to 1968 College Station purchased their water from the City of Bryan and Texas A&M University. 1968 University Drive Pump Station was built. 2 m.g. Ground Storage Reservoir 1 m.g. Elevated Tank located on Texas Ave. 1976 In production; May University Drive Well, leased from Whalen Corp. 1979 No longer on the City of Bryan's water system, Jan. (meters locked), still purchasing water from Texas A&M. 1981 In production,- Nov. roduction,Nov. Sandy Point Well #1 Sandy Point Well #2 Sand Point p Point Pump Station Dowlin Road Pum Station 3 m.�. round Storage Reservoir Cooling Tower #1 at Sandy Point 1982 bi production; Nov. Sandy Point Well #3, leased from Whalen Corp. 1985 M use; Oct. 1985 1988 Feb. 1989 May 2 m.g. Elevated Storage Tank located at Green T, . . " ' ' I " ' Z" f--" - - I* -- - T-- ---- -un -L 0--- -1 T -' City of College Station named U.S. Environmental Protection agency Region 6 1991 Environmental Excellence Award Winner The College Station Water Production and Distribution System was selected as the Regional winner for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's, Region 6, Regional Administration's Environmental Excellence Award for Public Water Supply. The City received this award based on judgment of the following criteria: quality of water produced; facility operations and maintenance; administrative and financial management; and customer relations. It was judged by a twelve member panel which included representatives from state regulatory agencies, the American Water Works Association, the National Rural Water Association, EPA Region 6, and the League of Women Voters. Region 6 is made up of Water Utilities Departments from Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, New Mexico and Arkansas. A ceremony for the presentation of this award was held in Dallas on August 15, 1991 where the City received a certificate, flag, and plaque. On September 19, 1991 another ceremony was held by the EPA honoring all Water Production and Distribution employees. They were each recognized for their continued efforts in providing our City with "Quality, Service and Performance - Our Promise To You!" CITY OF COLLEGE STATION U T I L I T I E S 1990 CURRENT WELL CAPACITY (4 Major Wells & 1 Minor Well) COOLING TOWER CAPACITY PUMPING CAPACITY FROM WELL FIELD (3 Pumps) TRANSMISSION LINE CAPACITY (Without Intermediate Pump Station) PUMPING CAPACITY TO DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (4 Pumps) GROUND STORAGE CAPACITY ELEVATED STORAGE CAPACITY PEAK DAY DEMAND - 1990 8/26/90 ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY DEMAND - 1990 17.0 MGD 17.0 MGD 20 MGD 20 MGD 29 MGD 10 3 MG MG MG MGD Where does College Station's water come from ... and how is it treated? College Statio gets all of its ater from deep wells located about ten miles nort of the city, in t e vicinity of Sandy Point Road and Old San Anton o Road. These ells draw water from the Simsboro Sands, which s approximately 3000 feet underground and in the middle of the ilcox Aquifer. a temperature of the water as it flows from and rground is- 118 degre To reduce the temperature, the water is p mped through cooling towe a a tion. This process lowers the temperature to around 90 e s Fahrenheit. The well Ovate is then chlorinated to assure it is disi fected, the pumped throu h 12 miles of transmission pipeline rom the we. field tot e owling Road Pump Station. The chlo ne residual is checked again and is brought up to the level requir cl by th Department of Health. Fluoride is then added to b ng t ater up t optimum level for maximum dental care preve on. Fin%eevated the water is pumped into the water di rib tion system and the stor s. This process ass es adequate of pressu e for use our homes us esses and pr des fire prote o or the resid is ollege St on. MARLIN 19 i fit( HEARNE CAMERON ;p• .0. SS► FE1D s fr BRYAN i s J. ROQCOAL.[ '. COLLEGE STATION CALDWELL EXPLANATION SIMSEORO OUTCROP • s o IMES OUTCROP OF SIMSBORO SAND FIGURE I THE MIDDLE PORTION OF CARRIZO/WILCOX AOUIFER EXPLANATION MAJOR AQUIFERS Yields large quantities of water in large areas of the State High Plains (Ogallala) ElAlluvium and Bolson Deposits Edwards -Trinity (Plateau) Edwards (Balcones Fault Zone -San Antonio Region) Edwards (Balcones Fault Zone -Austin Region) OUTCROP DOWNDIP Trinity Group OUTCROP OOWNDIP ', Carrizo-Wilcox Gulf Coast Major Aquifers CYPRESS -' -SABINE \, �NECHES %NECHES- ••'�. , -J� TRINITY TRINITY DA .-TRINITY- SAN JACINTO +� SAN JACINTO - SAN JACINTO- BRAZOS BRAZOS- �_COLORADO- COLORADO LAVACA LAVACA LAVACA- GUADALUPF GUADALUPE SAN ANTONIO- NUECES —SAN ANTONIO NUECES STATE OF TEXAS _NUECES- RIO GRANDE Texas Water Development Board N.mw 8, Texas Water Corrmasion ■ - z. S.M.-b. tsee IMARTLEY NDOME ON IN- ROKRTS il IEMIPI ILL II CANApIAN (CARSON 15Wy- RED - --- --r ------- PARMER T.3"ft iORISCOEHALL CBAILEY -,LAMB' HALE IMIDTLEY BRAZOS i I iWL&AW INA f&E4i1iN1HDCKLEY WARY BAYL01111 JAI YOAKUM wtLYNN rENT isT;. ��LL I TMF=K- ! IMO"i COLORADO _L IVER IJONES.il::Ijivip EAST RIO GRANDE 7 MIDLAND 0 _M CD,(E FR�#Wcs - BROWN ........... 4TI:w -- —----------- JE" LECHER < PRESiDI&-.-.__ X, ikiCL E L vAL VERDE RDS It iNNN y iUVALDE I MEDINA 14 MAVE K ZRALA IF EXPLANATION MINOR AQUIFERS Yields large quantities of water in small areas or relatively small quantities of water in large areas of the State ----"'-"i l._._._._._. OUTCROP DOWNDIP Woodbine Blaine Gypsum EsQueen City Igneous Rocks Sparta Marathon Limestone Edwards -Trinity (High Plains) Bone Spring and Vittorio Peak Limestones z iihiiiiii--T F-1 Santa Rosa Capitan Limestone Hickory Sandstone Rustler Ellenburger-San Saba Nacatoch Sand MMarble Falls Limestone Blossom Sand Note Other Aquifers Undifferentiated (Not Shown) Minor Aquifers SULPHUR COLLI WISE OPKIN ER i _'TORR LLAS I IKAW4 U CYPRESS Nam Go 111111111110LA_� �E SABINE .1 eosouE L STON VMC LENINAN �ORKLL 44V4 X.1 TRINITY r K ,TYLER (IMILAM A ILLIAMSON 1 1 ... ... 'GRII Avis r L -,y MoNrOOME TTF Tell 00MA1L XAR 1 LUPE BEND NECHES NECHES- X TRINITY 'A IA TRINITY TRINITY- WITT MAT RDA SAN JACINTO IA SAN JACINTO SAN JACINTO- IC BRAZOS BRAZOS- WUG -ILK COLORADO jI OAK COLORADO- LAVACA LAVACA LAVACA- CE GUADALUPE GUADALUPE jKLEK SAN ANTONIO- NUECES HOGG SAN ANTONIO IKENED, --NUECES NUECES- STATE OF TEXAS RIO GRANDE hipaiOW Tam W@W DeveI Board PI 9, Texas WI Cwnmissmn wILLACr LM CAMERON TYPICAL GRAVEL WALL WELL VERTICAL JIOLLOWSHAFT ELECTRIC MOTOR SHAFT DISCHARGE SCREENED VENT- HEAD CONCRETE FOUNDATION COLUMN PIPE STATIC WATER LEVEL CONDUCTOR ----PUMPING WATER CASING LEVEL GROUT _PUMP BOWL ASSEMBLY LINER SUCTION PIPE & CASING-----%, CONE STRAINER WELL SCREEN GRAVEL PACK SAND WATER BEARING FORMATION CLAY CLAY SAND WATER BEARING FORMATION _:777Z ...... ...... CLAY CLAY ...... - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - WATER BEARING FORMATION SAND I ;t.7--)L4gyj&L� PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT Facility: City of College Station Date: 7/23/91 Location: Well #2 WELL PUMP DATA Manufacturer: Johnston Serial #: N/A Bowl Type: 14" DC Stages: 5 Column Size: 12" x 3 1/2" x 2 3/16" Setting: 420 feet Design Point: 2100 GPM a 420' TDH MOTOR DATA Manufacturer: Westinghouse Serial #: 79-F55770 Horsepower: 400 Frame: 5008P20 Amps/Volts: 453/460 RPM: 1778 PERFORMANCE TEST DATA Static Level (ft) 165 10 Min Static 169 Operating Pressure (PSI) 46 (pump side of orifice plate) CCapacity (GPM) 2384 Pumping Level (ft) 221 Drawdown (ft) 56 Specific Capacity 42.6 Field Head (ft) 327 Water Horsepower 197.2 Overall Eff. 66.30% Horsepower Input 297.5 Kilowatt Input 222.0 Amp Draw 313-316-311 Actual Shaft Speed (RPM) 1782 Sand (oz./100 Gal) Clear Time (min) 60 ADDITIONAL DATA Pump Submergence (ft) 199 Meter Accuracy KWH/Million Gallons 1552 Airline Functional N/A Remarks: Flowmeter registers 2232 GPM Vibration analysis completed U rhiG'G�UDGI�v PE yr 1t + t t: v._. wa llon Support so*clalllfs j.. Facility: City of College Station Location: Well #1 WELL PUMP DATA Manufacturer: Johnston Bowl Type: 14" DC Column Size: 12" x 3 1/2•' x 2 3/ Design Point: 2100 GPM A 336' TDH MOTOR DATA Manufacturer: Westinghouse Horsepower: 400 Amps/Volts: 453/460 G-111 SERVICES Well Performance Evaluation Testing for City of College Station July - 1991 PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT Facility: City of College Station Date: 7/23/91 Location: Well #4 WELL PUMP DATA Manufacturer: Peerless Serial #: N/A Bowl Type: 14" HXB Stages: 6 Column Size: 12" x 3 1/2" x 2 3/16" Setting: 400 feet Design Point: 2800 GPM a 340 feet MOTOR DATA Manufacturer: U.S. Motors Serial #: P12P3350431 Horsepower: 400 Frame: 5008PH Amps/Volts: 436/460 RPM: 1775 PERFORMANCE TEST DATA Static Level (ft) 166 93. 10 Min Static 177 PERFORMANCE TEST DATA Static Level (ft) 172 10 Min Static 175 Operating Pressure 28 Capacity (GPM) 2322 Pumping Level (ft) 230 Drawdown (ft) 58 Specific Capacity 40.0 Field Head (ft) 295 Water Horsepower 173.0 Overall Eff. 71.87% Horsepower Input 240.7 Kilowatt Input 179.6 Amp Draw 269-261-253 Actual Shaft Speed (RPM) 1784 Sand (oz./100 Gal) Clear Time (min) 60 ADDITIONAL DATA Pump Submergence (ft) 180 Meter Accuracy 101. KWH/Million Gallons 1289 HP Utilization 54. Airline Functional No Remarks: Flowmeter registers 2345 GPM at 28 PSI discharge pressure. Vibration analysis completed on well pump. V ?MANCE TEST REPORT Date: 7/23/91 Serial #: N/A Stages: 5 Setting: 430 feet Serial #: 1S-82-06 Frame: 5008P20 RPM: 1772 PERFORMANCE TEST DATA Static Level (ft) 152 10 Min Static 155 Operating Pressure 17 Capacity (GPM) 3035 Pumping Level (ft) 225 Drawdown (ft) 73 Specific Capacity 41.6 Field Head (ft) 264 Water Horsepower 202.7 Overall Eff. 61.76% Horsepower Input 328.3 Kilowatt Input 245.0 Amp Draw 319-334-321 Actual Shaft Speed (RPM) 1782 Sand (oz./100 Gal) Clear Time (min) 60 ADDITIONAL DATA Pump Submergence (ft) 205 Meter Accuracy 99.5% KWH/Million Gallons 1345 HP Utilization 74.7% Airline Functional N/A Remarks: Flowmeter registers 3019 GPM at 17 PSI discharge pressure. Oil leak detected in upper section of motor. Vibration analysis completed on well pump. P.O. BOX 690309 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77269-0309 TELEPHONE (713) 894-8971 P.O. BOX 890309 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77269-0309 TELEPHONE (713) 894-8971 WATER ANALYSIS REPORT TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DIVISION OF WATER HYGIENE 1100 WEST 49TH STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS 78756 COLLEGE STATION CITY OF WATER SUPPLY #: 0210002 LABORATORY NO: EP902710 PO BOX 9960 SAMPLE TYPE: DISTRIBUTION COLLEGE STATION TX 77840 COLLECTOR REMARKS: COMPOSITE SAMPLES -GIT SOURCE: WELLS 1, 2, 3, & WHA DATE COLLECTED: 12/16/88 DATE RECEIVED: 12/20/88 DATE REPORTED: 2/15/89 CONSTITUENT NAME RESULT UNITS Calcium 4 mg/1 Chloride 54 mg/1 Fluoride 0.4 mg/1 Magnesium < 1 mg/1 Nitrate (as N) 0.04 mg/1 Sodium 202 mg/1 Sulfate 8 mg/1 Total Hardness/CaCO3 10 mg/1 pH 8.7 Dil. Conduct (umhos/cm) 903 Tot. Alka. as CaCO3 370 mg/1 Bicarbonate 429 mg/1 Carbonate 11 mg/1 Dissolved solids 492 mg/1 P. Alkalinity /CaCO3 9 mg/1 Arsenic < 0.010 mg/1 Barium 0.06 mg/1 Cadmium < 0.005 mg/1 Chromium < 0.02 mg/1 Copper < 0.02 mg/1 Iron < 0.02 mg/1 Lead < 0.0200 Mg/1 Manganese < 0.02 mg/1 Mercury < 0.0002 mg/1 Selenium < 0.002 mg/1 Silver < 0.01 mg/1 Zinc < 0.02 mg/1 Texas Department of Health Robert Bernstein, M.D., F.A.C.P. Commissioner February 11, 1991 Honorable Larry J. Ringer Mayor of College Station P. 0. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 1100 West 49th Street Austin, Texas 78756-3199 (512) 458-7111 Subject: Public Drinking Water Supply City of College Station - I.D. #0210002 Brazos County, Texas Dear Mayor Ringer: Robert A. MacLean, M.D. Deputy Commissioner Professional Services On January 3, 1991, our representative, Jane R. Montgomery, R.S., in company with Ed Hein and Tom Milson, Certified Operators, conducted a sanitary survey of the subject water system. As - a result of this survey, we find that your water system is currently being operated and maintained in general compliance with State Statutes and this Department's regulations and continues to merit its recognition as a State "Approved" system. We wish to commend you and your operating personnel for your continued efforts. In conclusion, we wish to express our thanks and appreciation for the courte- sies extended during the survey. Should clarification of this letter be desired or if we may be of other assistance, please contact our Austin office at (512) 458-7497 or ur regional office at (817) 778-6744. Sincerely, S. Oran S. Buckner, Jr U, P.E., R.S. Assistant Regional Director for Environmental & Consumer Health Protection OSB:JRM:bw ccs: Charles. -Otto, --Assistant .Superintendent John Woody, Director of Public Works Brazos County Health Department Public Health Region 1 6/25/91 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION RECORDED WATER PRODUCTION BY CALENDAR YEAR YEAR WATER PURCHASED WATER PRODUCED TOTAL WATER # OF WATER CONNECTIONS 1970 533, 839, 000 NONE 533, 839, 000 3,296 1971 561, 464, 000 NONE 561, 464, 000 31422 1972 595, 097, 000 NONE 595, 097, 000 3,581 1973 541, 999, 000 NONE 541, 999, 000 31782 1974 699, 759, 000 NONE 699, 759, 000 3,959 1975 696,214,000 NONE 696,214,000 4,233 1976 934, 356, 000 125, 664, 000 1, 060, 020, 000 49815 1977 1, 045, 648, 000 207, 473, 000 1,253,121,000 5,384 1978 1, 070, 598, 000 185, 340, 000 1, 255, 938, 000 5,755 1979 966, 047, 000 162, 560, 000 1,128, 607, 000 63118 1980 1, 212, 546, 000 188, 933, 000 1, 401, 479, 000 6,594 1981 1, 362, 639, 000 187, 518, 000 1,550,157,000 7,585 1982 161, 981, 000 1, 650, 648, 000 1, 812, 629, 000 8,476 1983 55, 426, 000 1,778,196,000 1, 833, 622, 000 9,025 1984 40, 730, 000 2,119, 288, 000 2,160, 018, 000 95262 1985 89, 574, 000 2,122, 386, 000 2, 211, 960, 000 9,390 1986 103, 862, 000 2, 026, 319, 000 2,130,181, 000 9,427 1987 161,160, 000 2, 048, 226, 000 2, 209, 386, 000 9,581 1988 225, 906, 000 2, 257, 235, 000 21483,141,000 9,767 1989 138, 957, 000 2,197, 293, 000 2, 336, 250, 000 9,930 1990 143,125, 000 2, 200, 070, 000 2,343,195,000 10,065 -4., 0 v 0 .i w co 0 Q0 Ul -o CD a r�l V , N a C7 a cALLaNS - - N N 0 0 0 o a 0 o a o 0 o a o 0 0 o a o 0 0 a o o a o 0 m m 0 0 m v m v a m m l► m 0 v c v 0 Z W 0 a N 0 D D m D m m 33 r � � D A 0 m C� A m to 0 0 m m 0 0 m v m v a m m l► m 0 v c v 0 Z W 0 a N AWARD WINNING WATER .. . Water quality is maintained on a regular basis through scheduled and random testing. DATE LOCATION PITOT READING LENGTH OP TIME FLUSHED TO'CAI. GALLONS CHLORINE RESIDUAL COMMENTS N orthg e �ll�;l 15 u S ��>�) 00 l• ZLus� e „,t m c. Y Chimney Hill F#g•9 1 -4L�go— End of Winter Park Street — 2" Blowoff ��Z/ 3 -� Windwood Results End of Appomattox — 2" Blowoff A a Ce �3/5�a9Y � 30 940 Raintree Results End of Raintree Drive — 2" Blowoff GID 5 Emerald Forest P 99 Results End of Appomattox near Pool — 2" BO /p2 6 S e b e s t a Road 7//- 9� Results Sebesta Road at Nash's — 2" Blowoff W o o d c r e e k 7,'1�9 Results -� 2 c7ctr. � — ci �, rm n Q.y�n B- 0-13 End of Woodcreek Drive — 2" Blowoff �i-icc••.•v 8 5 u./ �.�.�. � plc Results �� r ✓�r�c..�✓ v�-I+CC.L-Y_ 9 Shenandoah P41 9,9 �yK.C/C/ �/U _North End of Decatur — 2" Blowoff 10 Wes tri d g e per% Results End of Westridge Drive — 2" Blowoff A 11 R a n d o �N&7 Results «�. / . &9D /ami, 3 WEEKLY CHLOE ESIDUALTEST DATE:P N orthg e �ll�;l Results Normandy Square Apts — Bldg T501 2 Chimney Hill F#g•9 Results End of Winter Park Street — 2" Blowoff ��Z/ 3 -� Windwood Results End of Appomattox — 2" Blowoff A a 4 �3/5�a9Y � 30 940 Raintree Results End of Raintree Drive — 2" Blowoff GID 5 Emerald Forest P 99 Results End of Appomattox near Pool — 2" BO /p2 6 S e b e s t a Road 7//- 9� Results Sebesta Road at Nash's — 2" Blowoff W o o d c r e e k 7,'1�9 Results End of Woodcreek Drive — 2" Blowoff /"3 8 Southwest Parkway 7#A0 Results SW Prky at Holleman — 2" Blowoff 9 Shenandoah P41 9,9 Results _North End of Decatur — 2" Blowoff 10 Wes tri d g e per% Results End of Westridge Drive — 2" Blowoff A 11 R a n d o �N&7 Results I , m WATER FLOW TESTS .. . WAJ'Ff2 FLOW I -ES]" SUMMAIZY SI-IEL For Engineering, Design, and Analysis Purposes. CA E V _•_ `� / ter+ �• I N r f i, E -N- 8CALE: 1' 400' 'POST O K SHO PING CENTER to 4 Is''�� -- EXHIBIT. 'C' t c4R` �� TEST NO. 1 �V- �i UNDEVELOPED HYDRANT B ` 100+ STATIC UNDEVELOPED •�95+RESIDUAL •�''. SUBJECT PROPERTY \\ LEGEND ��' •� O RIRE HYDRANT 1 �` T VALVE HYDRANT Ale \ ,/ • / w� 94+ PITOT Ic'w 1627 GPM FURROW , dw CA E V _•_ `� / ter+ �• I N r f i, E -N- 8CALE: 1' 400' 'POST O K SHO PING CENTER to 4 Is''�� -- EXHIBIT. 'C' t c4R` �� TEST NO. 1 Water Distribution Statistics Meter Change Main Line Service/Meter Outs Leaks Leaks 1988-1989 October 10 19 57 November 22 22 48 December 9 15 43 January 10 16 25 February 7 12 44 March 16 16 35 April 13 9 16 May 4 7 31 June 20 8 29 July 16 13 42 t. August 32 15 53 h September 13 20 33 Owner Problem Calls 104 21 23 22 29 28 37 21 21 22 24 32 Total 172 172 456 384 1989-1990 October 19 25 42 36 November 14 17 51 23 December 30 14 31 194 January 22 14 48 23 February 9 11 39 16 March 9 14 45 32 April 4 9 33 36 May 7 11 39 26 June 9 15 35 34 July 6 21 37 26 August 18 39 71 35 September 15 30 76 46 Total 162 220 547 527 1990-1991 October 14 17 58 39 November 9 16 45 39 December 14 14 39 73 January 4 16 30 48 February 5 28 48 32 March 9 9 42 42 April 8 18 38 35 May 4 10 32 26 June 4 7 48 17 July 2 29 54 45 August 4 20 59 41 September 6 17 42 32 83 IF77 AMEN 201 535 469 *see attached graph no 1 1 1 . 1 II ►� i 1990-1991 WATER TAPS October 8 November 6 December November 10 9 Ate' 11 December 8 April 17 May January 11 16 July 9 February 13 September 13 March 26 April 20 May 13 June 16 - July 24 t August 22 September 10 .:-• '-�' Total 181 At 1988-1989 October 7 November 6 December 6 January 9 Ate' 11 March 16 April 17 May 20 June 16 July 9 August October 7 November 6 December 6 January 9 February 11 March 16 April 17 May 20 June 16 July 9 August 12 September 13 Total 142 October 11 November 8 December 8 ' January 11 February 16 ' March 10'' April 34 May 10 June 42 - • �`� : �• _ .. July 10 _ August 6�' September 11 Total 177 *see attached graph Alt tun :PK - I Water Production Water Distribution 1990 Training (1460 Total Hours 1991 Training (1274 Total Hours) ♦ ^f%. 42% 0 Certification 1:1 Safety 0 Misc 36% SUPPORTS RVICES Customer Service Community Education Community Booths: 1%� Water awareness booths are displayed throughout the year for a wide variety of activities. These booths contain a vast assortment of literature, balloons, stickers, ice water, and current water statistics. Some of the events in which the booths are displayed are local festivals, health fairs, and drug awareness rallies. Our Divisions also recognize and celebrate "National Water Utilities Awareness Week" in May each year. During this week we host poster contests, conduct a large amount of programs within the schools, submit articles to the local media for public awareness, and appreciate our employee's for outstanding work within the water industry. Youth Education Public Awareness School Programs: '%� Programs are constructed around the age level. These programs usually consist of a short video, a discussion about water evolution, a history about College Station water, a description pointing out the process of producing water, question and answer time, and pamphlets are then handed out at the close. Tours: Tours are conducted at either the Water Production facility or the Wastewater Treatment Plant. These tours are also constructed around the age level of the customer. They include an in depth discussion on the operations of the systems, and include a walk through the facility. U) 2'. Q 4%T' > Li Q m D m 'n z J) 5? C) Ww Q! LL- 0 LL 7 z , 0 7 0 CL LLJ LL low 0 ♦ z F� tiU um C4 0 z an y *- INHOUSE MAINTENANCE WELDING/FABRICATION ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE/ REPAIR PUMP/MOTOR MAINTENANCE LUBRICATION FLOWMETER CALIBRATION MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE/ REPAIR PLUMBING SAND BLASTING/PAINTING GROUNDS MAINTENANCE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/ REPAIR WASTEWATER SERVICES College Station Wastewater Treatment Plant Historical Information 1956 In service: May Plant #I was built - 600,000 gallons per day capacity 1973 In service: Oct. Plant #2 was built - 2,000,000 gallons per day capacity Drying beds were built 1978 In service: Aug. Plant #3 was built - 2,900,000 gallons per day capacity Centrifuge #I was placed in service Additional sludge handling capabilities 1985 In service: Mar. Plants #4 & #5 were placed in service - 4,000,000 gallons per day capacity Centrifuge #2 was built Plant #I taken out of service 1988 In service: May Lick Creek WWTP built - .5 million gallons per day capacity 1991 In service: Aug. Chlorination / Dechlorination facilities built Sludge storage apron built Sludge piping modifications installed CITY OF COLLEGE STATION U T I L I T I E S 1990 WASTEWATER PERMITTED TREATMENT PLANT CAPACITY Discharge Permit No. 10024 9.4 MGD Outfall No. 001 4.9 MGD Outfall No. 002 4.0 MGD Outfall No. 003 0.5 MGD PEAK DAY FLOW - 1990 Outfall No. 001 4/25/90 4.7 MGD Outfall No. 002 12/10/90 11.5 MGD Outfall No. 003 8/16/90 .045 MGD ANNUAL DAILY AVERAGE FLOW - 1990 Outfall No. 001 2.7 MGD Outfall No. 002 2.9 MGD Outfall No. 003 .012 MGD `, > � r �;�- : /•'�F. �..i if��.�.. .amu-. �-. �•�a• .� �`,. r m• ml CITY OF COLLEGE STATION ER I S TP 4&5 COLLEGE STATION'S LARGEST TREATMENT FACILITY, COMPLETED IN 1985, CONTINUES TO UNDERGO MODIFICATION TO MEET FUTURE EPA PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 3 ED z CLI Q L,J U CL CZ A Li [L 71 CL 2: cu 0a_ U 5- 0 z F--4 O cy— U LJ U Z Z 0 C/) 2: F-- 06-1 af CL w0 < >-- f� —J 12L cl- r -I z L.Li L.Li L.Li U .41 ) QC < zu CL Li < < zu a- L.Li < CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Plant No. 00/ Date: �' /` %/' WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT PLANT No. 00/ City of Colle a Station TOTAL SUSPENDED ( NON -FILTERABLE) SOLIDS,mg/liter DAILY NFORMATION FLOW FROM OUR WATERUALITY Q LAB Wastewater Treatment Lab Report CHECKED BALANCE USING --.20 -- GRAM WEIGHT 6 t-esLJ-, j j Sample Settleable Solids Biochemical Total SuspenEd Dissolved Fecal Coliforms 1 Description Plant No. CJ Oxygen Demand Solids Oxy,ggen # Colonies/l00 MLS PH Date a Time Collected (SS) (BOD) (TSS) (D(7) Sample Collector Station t . , i _ Description _ Raw Sample - Temperature 4 Filter Identification Observations 18 77 Final y, S TIME: 11"01) 6";z 7 7 Creek -Above Test Performed By:-c�Q , Technician. 7 1 st. Weight of Fi I t er Plus Residua (g) O, /� 9 z lJ, /z / V Discharge 8 2nd Weight of Filter Plus Residue (g) U /zq O, /2 /V 0, IZl� 9 Creek -Below Discharge p I p 10 y,y /i',,/ i q pff taken at on Final pIl taken at 1/lr ^— on Raw pH taken at on Above pH taken at on Below By Lab Technician: n Social J 460-92-5839 V Security No. 463-48-0380 0 Sample Collection Samples Co Coller_tion Flow Milliliters Raw Sa Time Reading Colle>, ted P 10 A.M. MGD ?� c 11 A.M. o MGD 300 MGD 01 12 A.M. C' fro A 1 P.M. MGD >,< Bioche f 2 P.M. 3 P.M. MGD I MGD .3 L2``(� Fecal C Settleab Total Su i Final Temperature r oC ^7 cl °F SAMPLE City of Colleg SAMPLE Wastewater Trea Identification 1 � Plant No. CJ I', Fecal Coliform T ,,Or M1 Membrane Filter (MF) Ih i Date a Time Collected /p- /&_ 91 Sample Type THUR 3 PM Jl Sample Collector Station t . , i _ Description _ 72 Sample - Temperature 4 Filter Identification Observations 18 l c' ti Date & Time of Collection Date 8 Time Analysis Began Flow at Time of Collection TIME: 11"01) Time Sample Tested 6 Date&TlmeofColonyExamination hq -Z— el / ,7 Test Performed By:-c�Q , Technician. MIS Filtered Colony Count Remarks I y o L1 '4-'1 I ( . 4 Procedure from Standard Methods 17th E¢. page 9-94 (9222 p) - Comments: SUSPENDED SOLIDS SAMPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE /2c,, Identification RAW FINALI FINAL2 I', Type (grab, etc.) 6 PART - COM OSITE: 10 AM THUR 3 PM 2� Date a Time Collected /p- /&_ 91 10 AM THUR 3 PM 3' Sample Collector 6'rea, 0. 72 cD 4 Filter Identification GELMAN A/E 18 l c' ti 5 Date 8 Time Analysis Began 77 TIME: 11"01) 6 mi. Sample Fi It ered 50 250 250 7 1 st. Weight of Fi I t er Plus Residua (g) O, /� 9 z lJ, /z / V 0,/2- I (� 8 2nd Weight of Filter Plus Residue (g) U /zq O, /2 /V 0, IZl� 9 Difference ( Ist.-2nd.) p o p 10 o /� 9z o• /� / el O. 12 13 /2c,, D, 12 0 0 O. /,zo g 14 15 700g� D- ODa 6 0,000S %. 16 /72 2,1 3.Z OLUCO OLUTAMIC ACID 72 cD 1 1-3.1 ' / 72 rh5/L 3 mg /L ° r 18 l c' ti DO BEFORE INCUBATION: 7.7 77 TIME: 11"01) 3 3 DATE: r 0 --z - 9 TECHNICIANi (i' < 3y ? 8 > 1 DO AFTER INCUBATI'0 J 1 7• % e"� 1 TIME: WA' '7" DATE: 141-7-2 I DEPLETIO CORRECTED MLS 0 BOD JOF BOD DEPLETION SAMPLE SAMPLE MG !L AVERAGE y,y /i',,/ i q VA SEED CORRECTION ( RAW INFLUENT* SEED) 21CI X 3,c, e • to 7 —7 2m1. USED IN 2/cj X j, t e , (V C, CHLORINATED SAMPLES AND 2 /1,;-x y S- GLUCO- GLUTAMIC ACID. DEPLETION — SEED CORRECTION = CORRECTED DEPLETION BOD p. 525 STANDARD METHODS 16 th Ed BELOW STREAM BELOW STREAM �u BOD WATER DILUTION %. OLUCO OLUTAMIC ACID 72 cD 1 1-3.1 ' 5 1 l c' ti 71 77 3, c(':7y,o 3 3 3y ? 8 > j7.7 c-o e"� SEED CORRECTION ( RAW INFLUENT* SEED) 21CI X 3,c, e • to 7 —7 2m1. USED IN 2/cj X j, t e , (V C, CHLORINATED SAMPLES AND 2 /1,;-x y S- GLUCO- GLUTAMIC ACID. DEPLETION — SEED CORRECTION = CORRECTED DEPLETION BOD p. 525 STANDARD METHODS 16 th Ed CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Plant No. 00/ Date: �' /` %/' WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT PLANT No. 00/ City of Colle a Station TOTAL SUSPENDED ( NON -FILTERABLE) SOLIDS,mg/liter DAILY NFORMATION FLOW FROM OUR WATERUALITY Q LAB Wastewater Treatment Lab Report CHECKED BALANCE USING --.20 -- GRAM WEIGHT 6 t-esLJ-, j j Sample Settleable Solids Biochemical Total SuspenEd Dissolved Fecal Coliforms 1 Description Plant No. CJ Oxygen Demand Solids Oxy,ggen # Colonies/l00 MLS PH Date a Time Collected (SS) (BOD) (TSS) (D(7) Sample Collector Station t . , i _ Description _ Raw Sample - Temperature 4 Filter Identification Observations 1 77 Final y, S 3, c(':7y,o 6";z 7 7 Creek -Above Test Performed By:-c�Q , Technician. 7 1 st. Weight of Fi I t er Plus Residua (g) O, /� 9 z lJ, /z / V Discharge 8 2nd Weight of Filter Plus Residue (g) U /zq O, /2 /V 0, IZl� 9 Creek -Below Discharge p I p 10 y,y /i',,/ i q pff taken at on Final pIl taken at 1/lr ^— on Raw pH taken at on Above pH taken at on Below By Lab Technician: n Social J 460-92-5839 V Security No. 463-48-0380 0 Sample Collection Samples Co Coller_tion Flow Milliliters Raw Sa Time Reading Colle>, ted P 10 A.M. MGD ?� c 11 A.M. o MGD 300 MGD 01 12 A.M. C' fro A 1 P.M. MGD >,< Bioche f 2 P.M. 3 P.M. MGD I MGD .3 L2``(� Fecal C Settleab Total Su i Final Temperature r oC ^7 cl °F SAMPLE City of Colleg SAMPLE Wastewater Trea Identification 1 � Plant No. CJ I', Fecal Coliform T ,,Or M1 Membrane Filter (MF) Ih i Date a Time Collected /p- /&_ 91 Sample Type THUR 3 PM Jl Sample Collector Station t . , i _ Description _ 72 Sample - Temperature 4 Filter Identification Observations 1 DO BEFORE INCUBATION: 7.7 Date & Time of Collection Date 8 Time Analysis Began Flow at Time of Collection 3, c(':7y,o Time Sample Tested 6 Date&TlmeofColonyExamination hq -Z— el / ,7 Test Performed By:-c�Q , Technician. MIS Filtered Colony Count Remarks I y o L1 '4-'1 I ( . 4 Procedure from Standard Methods 17th E¢. page 9-94 (9222 p) - Comments: SUSPENDED SOLIDS SAMPLE SAMPLE SAMPLE D, 12 0 0 O. /,zo g Identification RAW FINALI FINAL2 I', Type (grab, etc.) 6 PART - COM OSITE: 10 AM THUR 3 PM 2� Date a Time Collected /p- /&_ 91 10 AM THUR 3 PM 3' Sample Collector 6'rea, 0. 72 cD 4 Filter Identification GELMAN A/E 1 DO BEFORE INCUBATION: 7.7 5 Date 8 Time Analysis Began TIME: 11"01) 3, c(':7y,o 6 mi. Sample Fi It ered 50 250 250 7 1 st. Weight of Fi I t er Plus Residua (g) O, /� 9 z lJ, /z / V 0,/2- I (� 8 2nd Weight of Filter Plus Residue (g) U /zq O, /2 /V 0, IZl� 9 Difference ( Ist.-2nd.) p o p 10 o /� 9z o• /� / el O. 12 13 /2c,, D, 12 0 0 O. /,zo g 14 15 700g� D- ODa 6 0,000S �u BOD WATER DILUTION %. 16 /72 2,1 3.Z OLUCO OLUTAMIC ACID 72 cD 1 / 72 rh5/L 3 mg /L ° r 18 1 DO BEFORE INCUBATION: 7.7 71 TIME: 11"01) 3, c(':7y,o DATE: r 0 --z - 9 TECHNICIANi (i' < 1 DO AFTER INCUBATI'0 J 1 7• % j7.7 c-o 1 TIME: WA' '7" DATE: 141-7-2 I DEPLETIO CORRECTED MLS 0 BOD JOF BOD DEPLETION SAMPLE SAMPLE MG !L AVERAGE y,y /i',,/ i q VA SEED CORRECTION ( RAW INFLUENT* SEED) 21CI X 3,c, e • to 7 —7 2m1. USED IN 2/cj X j, t e , (V C, CHLORINATED SAMPLES AND 2 /1,;-x y S- GLUCO- GLUTAMIC ACID. DEPLETION — SEED CORRECTION = CORRECTED DEPLETION BOD p. 525 STANDARD METHODS 16 th Ed BELOW STREAM BELOW STREAM �u BOD WATER DILUTION %. OLUCO OLUTAMIC ACID 72 cD 1 1-3.1 ' 5 1 l c' ti 71 77 3, c(':7y,o 3 3 3y ? 8 > j7.7 c-o e"� SEED CORRECTION ( RAW INFLUENT* SEED) 21CI X 3,c, e • to 7 —7 2m1. USED IN 2/cj X j, t e , (V C, CHLORINATED SAMPLES AND 2 /1,;-x y S- GLUCO- GLUTAMIC ACID. DEPLETION — SEED CORRECTION = CORRECTED DEPLETION BOD p. 525 STANDARD METHODS 16 th Ed 71 .., , ".—F 0.8 OCTECTO. Ilillljl IT L t , 'i UAL ( ,' l (l , Isis 1 i I f �_ I I i �. �. i i Ili _j _I__+- ►; � r!�'I— i j i 1`II ,r IIII I I �;I i I II ��Ii I � '�'+' � I ' I I �; I I i I� JLi I I '�,�-�,- '�4� , •-...W, . �_ .��-��-��..�.T,. .��. _ _,.� FlIP CHEMICAL ANALYSIS IS INTEGRATED tRONIC CONTROLLER TO PROVIDE �I f f I I ! ! w S� �� 1 1 � I9CESS REGULATION (; 'i I,' it I ijl'i;l j, i�1i 1.f11.;' ll ! ( I I � Ijr ! f .Ilj M�,�1+ Il;!��I! ! I'iii�� i'i`i�l'I''�I I Ir (('(! I I I�I�III lill!�I 11, I I ,I ; t -r! • 1 �i!� jl� 11, IIII�>• .� F—T i •�� I ,• IT Illi i I! 11 �I��I LI_ 1-411 �!!�i 'Ili► !7 17! y1 ' f I! ! I I C !'3 �I I li i I�'-i1�� ;I II? II,I I �H ijI�'1 6 (i I !i I i � , Ir I !I(I� II lil'I' i i _..a?) _ � III �I Iv I�I!; � 'I�I !�' Hil! Illi jI I�IIi; i 11'llli Illllill,; I li i � IIII►ili,r,jil 1!I' IIII , � �i��i ! ' � I i #''IIII 1�� l �!�I{ I I 1i � (I l � !I� I► ;II i1 i f l iii � !1 I!! I I, ►il`I) iIIII` _ L! !J _ _..}_� � I � 1 '_.� _! I l± l l l l l l (I l i i� lI , ;��r_ , I I�;II II • ,,�_ ! ' I !IIII ' I !�;,.�. I. T(II�1�1!Iji!Iilj iII) ili i NHIR10 T_�.. �.,x ! _ t -,--I ! �_..,,..- - ,_lz..l... . ,. I.o.! ��.;. .._.L -M � ! .. . r,..��-.1.y,o.! !•....�� i I `�+ � I! ,I ,+ it I iS 71 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION TEXAS WATER COMMISSION MONTH OF SEPTEMBER 1991 CARTER CREEK MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT PERMIT NO. WO -10024-001 DATE RIR PREC. _ SEWAGE FLOW RRWINFLUENT ___ __ FINAL_____- EFFLUENT-_____ ____CL2_mg/1 ----- _ _ TEMP INCHES TREATED BYPASSED S.S. 800 TSS S.S. BOD TSS D.O. FECAL pH TEMP BEFORE AFTER CL2 S02 F gpd gpd ml/1 mg/1 mg/1 ml/1 mg/1 III mg/1 COL. F S02 SO2 LBS LBS 1 75 1.93 3485000 .74 .04 140 19 2 76 .16 3055000 .6 0 120 36 3 72 .46 3483000 30 90 388 .1 7 4 6 - 14 7.7 64 .82 .01 160 37 4 72 .28 3119000 6 110 188 .1 4 2 6.1 13 7.7 62 .83 .02 180 38 5 72 .05 3150000 34 7.7 82 1.07 .03 180 35 6 74 .11 3289000 51 7.7 80 1 .04 120 39 7 75 .21 3788000 1.13 0 180 43 9 76 .77 4028000 .64 0 10 51 Effluent Quality 9 74 .2 3602000 17 7.7 80 - .83 0 1550 19 10 75 - CLR 3253000 1.5 85 74 - .1 4 1 6.2 18 7.7 85 .46 0 180 34 11 75 - CLR 2990000 2.5 97 92 .1 4 1 6.2 37 7.8 84 - .77 .02 140 35 12 73 - CLR 2988000 20 7.8 84 1.13 .01 140 33 Required Reporting 13 74 CLR 29340001.13 .03 160 37 14 77 - CLR 3089000 .74 0 140 39 15 79 - CLOY 3363000 .71 .01 160 34 16 76 - .03 3282000 71 7.7 83 .76 .05 180 40 17 77 - CLR 3006000 5 83 146 .1 4 1 6.2 84* 7.7 85 - .84 .01 160 31 19 63 - CLOY 2864000 4.5 100 118 ' 2 2 6.1 62 7.7 879 .4e .03 . 160 31 TEXAS WATER COMMISSION 20 59 - CLOY 2795000 .64 ° 280 31 P. O. BOX 13087 • CAPITOL STATION . AUSTIN. TEXAS 78711 21 57 - CLR 2654000 .4 .02 140 27 MONTHLY EFFLUENT REPORT 22 58 - CLR 2868000 .61 .03 150 28 23 73 - CLOY 2886000 41 7.7 81 .25 0 110 24 24 73 - CLOY 3059000 5 89 112 .1 4 3 6 52 7.7 83 .64 .01 160 29 OLLEGE STATION, CITY OF 25 54 - 1.1 3016000 5.5 79 84 .1 4 2 6.1 71 7.7 78 .53 .01 180 30 26 59 - CLR 2842000 40 7.7 80 .48 .02 160 30 PAGE 1 OF 2 27 59 - CLR 2945000 .59 .04 120 31 .0 . B 0 X 9960 1 I: 0 28 66 - CLR 2924000 .38 .01 140 31 OOLEGE STATION, TEXAS 29 66 - CLR 3012000 .58 0 160 32 7 7 8 4 2 J `9 3U 64 - CLR 3056000 120 7.7- 84 .34 .01 120 37 31 m rE TOTRL 2098 5.32 93951000 0 60 733 1202 .8 33 16 49. 8.4417 131 1398 20.86 .47 4690 993 W 4 ti PERMIT NUMBER YEAR MO. AVG 70 .1773 3131700 0 7.5 92 150 .1 4 2 6 7.7 82 .6953 .0157 156 33 �f MFiXIF1UM 1.93 4020000 0 30 110 388 .1 7 4 6.2 120 7.8 85 1.13 J:::.�5 2817 51 BE USED FOR OTT tt ��77 LLICK CREEK FACILITY INSTRUCTIONS AND D�FINTTIONS TWC COPY MINIMUM .03 2654000 - 0 1.5 79 74 .1 2 1 6 13 7.7 78 .25 110 19 EFFLUENT CONDITION No. FREQUENCY SAMPLE R VALUE UNITS EX. OF ANALYSIS I TYPE SIGNRTURE-- OF OPERATOR _______ CERTIFICATE NO. 45542304 GRADE B REPORTED CP iF PERMITTED DAYS " + NA 000045342 REPORTED BYPASS PERMITTED DAYS/MTH AREA CODE 1 NUMBER 003101024 REPORTED a°Ds MAJOR Form Approved. 0M8 No. 2040-0004. DLY.AVG. PERMITTED 0°3101050 REPORTED 8005 (69.701 DLY.MAX. PERMITTED 003102024 REPORTED BOD5 YEAR MO DAY OLY.AVG. PERMITTED 004006080 REPORTED PH ### NO DISCHARGE NATF• R..A inar.uetiDn[ h.}Or. eemd.tina this form - MAXIMUM PERMITTED 004006081 REPORTED PH M I NI MU M PERMITTED 005301024 REPORTED TSS n LWEE MG/L,- DLY.AYG. PERMITTED 005301050 REPORTED TSS OLY.MAX. PERMITTED 1 CERTIFY THAT 1 AM FAMILIAR WITH THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT AND THAT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF SUCH INFORMATION IS TRUE AND COMPLETE AND ACCURATE, TELEPHONE NO. I I I 1111L- (J Card Only) QUANTITY (46-13) OR LOADING (J4 61) AREA CODE 1 NUMBER P[RMITT[[ NAM[/ADORES, (Inciudf F.cdily N..RE/LOc.Ib. I/dNJJrrr.1/ ADDRE•f �/] (�� ']i 11 NATIONAL. PDLLOTA IT DI.CH..GT [L.MINAT.ON.YET.M DISCHARGE MONITORING a -Ir) T Y 0047163 (NPD£S) REPORT IDMR) 1779 U 01 A MAJOR Form Approved. 0M8 No. 2040-0004. _--SDLIL_��T�1L`IL---��(�_ _ P[RMITNVMB[R oI•TH.•�.N�M••• F - FINAIPPP(ovalexpires 6-30-91. ------------------ (69.701 MONITORING PERIOD TOTAL FACILITY DISCHARGE ►AClm-mUI -AL-DIL-F-19P ------ YEAR M� DAY YEAR MO DAY ---�g-77�4Q- .. .. .. .. ... ..-.. .. ... -.... ... .... .. .. .. .. .. ►woM To .__ _.. .., ... ,. .. ### NO DISCHARGE NATF• R..A inar.uetiDn[ h.}Or. eemd.tina this form - PARAMETER (J Card Only) QUANTITY (46-13) OR LOADING (J4 61) (, C.Td O.ly) QUALITY (JE -d!) ORCONCENTRATION (,6 -JJ) (71-61) NO Fp[pu[NCr of EX ...LYS.. SAM►LE TYPE (JJ -J7) AVERAGE MAXIMUM UNIT[ MINIMUM AVER AO[ MAXIMUM UNIT[ 6761) (6160) (69.701 OYY.;EN, DISS3LV90 SAMPLE 19) (Da) .$;',�40.0�lxa(aaa;: "�'s<� �VICE/ RAB 00300 11 ri 7 MIT ###aa#`.; ##### ### EFFLUENT GROSS VAL(1 REQUIREMENT 4(k £ #### `° N � < �ti` n LWEE MG/L,- BOB, 5 -DAY [AMPLE r t F# ( 26) 19) (20 DF.;F. :) MEASUREMENT Oaa # 20 ,; 30 4 �, gICF/ One -6 00310 1 0 7 PERMIT -� 817 aaaaa ZFPLUBNT G?9SS VAI.0 REQUIREMENT 30DA A0 LBS D 00 4`TMC/L� PIIEAMPL[ MEASUREMENT 1.2) 00400 1 0 9 PERMIT y EFFLUENT GROSi YkLU. RHQUIR[NtNT so SOLIDS, TOTAL SAMPLE #a##411 ( 26) as#### ( 19) SUSPENDED MEASUREMENT WICE/ OMP -6 00533 1 0 0 PERMIT ^ 817��` REQUIREMENT Q. Y' s °Vk `�Y EFFLUENT GROSS VALtI 30D Bim/Asa I �V FLOG, IN CONDUIT OR SAMPLE ( 03) THRll TREATMENT PLAN1 MEASUREMENT ## #g �` A�#�# QII,TM OT1LZ 50050 1 0 0 PERMIT `` R�:PORT ' Rt#QRx ` ### EFFLUENT GROSS VALU . R[OUIRFM[NT '30DA AVG` �� G „ .€1., `R•; ;'`4' CHLJRINE, TOTAL SAMPLE 19) R:SIDUAL MEASUREMENT 7 50060 A 0 0 PcRMIT L# aaa ?', 41` ##a Q DISINFECT PROS C'IPL RrQUIREMJtNr #### aaa#aa COLIFORM, FP.CAL SAMPLE ####a# #a#aaa ( ! ( 13) GENERAL MEASUREMENT 74055 1 0 0 b PERMIT 14#0409EFFLUENT #044�g# �#� GROSS VALUE RrQUIREM FII S •r.: r• ,: Cfi� ;: .a I.-. NAM[/TITLE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE TYPED OR PRINTED OFFICER I CERTIFY UNDIES RNALTY OF ANO AM FAMILMA WITH THE ON MV MVOY OF THOS[ OST -43 THE ~ORMAT"N .S TMA ACCURATE ANO COMPLETE A0 ANT PENALT.S FOR SaNBMITTIK TNL POSSISAITY OF FI.E AND 11 u S C 1 I ] 1, Ih.Ml1✓I ..d.. +.I rrN.Nw. I..N•�•+••-•I ��•+^•6-14...d1 LAW THAT I HAVE PERSONALLY INFORMATION SUSA.TTEO HEREIN AND WAXVIDUALS RWEOIATELV MESPONSISLE I BELIEVE THE SIB..T TED WIORMATION . AM AWARE THAI T.IERE FALSE ~ORMATION AI"WIONAENT SE[ IB JLC I .AFT I.Ir.. I.HId. /.A.. A, ...n. ESANNNED BASED NOR AA[ SIG .ICLUQNG IOo. wN0 SIGNATURE A. III. II+. OFFICER OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OR AUTHORIZED AGENT TELEPHONE D A T E NUMBER YEAR MO DAYCOOK DAYS 0 MG/L 20.00 MG/L 45.00 LBS/DAY 83.00 STD UNIT 9.00 STO UNIT 6.00 MG/L 20.0 MG/L 145-0- NAME PLANT OPERATOR EXECUTIVE OFFICER 1/WEEK 1/WEEK 1/MEEK 2/MONTH 2/MONTH NA NA 3 -PRT CC 3 -PRT CC 3 -PRT CO GRABPKLC GRABPKLO 1/WEEK 10513 -PRT CC 11411/WEEK SIGNATURE PLANT OPERATOR EXECUTIVE OFFICER 3 -PRT CO DATE YEAR MO YEAR MO � \ •' �, it �•, (-! v � r Y'�r r+ 7 r) � // s'+ a r� �;• r �r"�, � r r .1'� , 4 � \-' � �.. 3 �I.l�i�+'�' ,'.: , 5� S,a .t , • .��'+ �` I• � '�L: r+'T ��- �,'�� ("'`y, �� -!M r.ry,.�*h .�' ♦ Sk.�l�h`y-� �'r.�. xr �� M, AP +. `: r • r ►; �- �� r' �` - � �" ±yid �..�:� ,�• 4 •t �- �' " _ �' yr .Y. ».:•. %`. s,'. �!`,�'" •s!r• 4 ~ .r'fjly.4•�'"' /. ' ,I.- i'7 IV �vw!1(�i ^r.'�'1�. ►.•. '�4 i'� flikl;.. •� �'` 1'• r✓gs'Jri�f+W,_w ( J�: ,I �:2'-` I'' .��;. `•. a +41 N 1•I.�: fir �T.��r .{',�i �� :S'�#.t ?- t t�I. .r..^4 �['i. •, •��;�'._•,�`►s��_ �, M 't „� • .r '�e J•. � a (� `';�' '�,i•��R�a� .t�.., r itrt'�, "` ',•�+t�t - ,4 j++' , ,.-� r.X y _- r��e ' d' •i�a'y��{� % .J j. t ;'.t'� r � _ K 'h •, � .•t<. 4 _'� � ,�� .� � , .r„� , '^'L •r� J } } e i 1' 'X:... '� ,Y a' +•� •.a1. .lid �: .,��•AV . s� �' I ''�-�' ti� " ;:ir' w! w•: � %� •:� b �'G �., 'I •�"k,- '7' �,> -,� •� ( i 'S: a••a R < •+ •�D: QCT :!a"�' ...I t dh i v,Y "I iii` •� j .ai. 1:�� t�Y� i .r r��.: � L�. • �i . r -�, .p,i � ,�.• y"�'a v- .� II•• �` i � 't,'._� ( •j`4. '�� a .i ,r�*.'r� ;y,> :�'�°':-_. e..►+f :'�R;. -."„ r! ._ . �� 1. }�,.. 06i:•u,, �. a..�;h yi +^ ^' .�. a r •� .fir �, ;�� 4 - l _ � - . � ' r.1• •�r'',� X15•. ,,�, � '.�: .> �� 7IN i, - g;� y r� ;� - - .. _.�� .J4. ` •� I ♦ \ rA r -til 1} .� •Tr r!' -r�� r. f -9•W i.t ,est ' "� 7 1. -y'r,: - - :/k' � i�� 1( •`, . ��,1 �� . M,. t / I _ Ir. a4.�; � t l v i� � � •' 1 �r.: � 'lr •t^ `6" . �•+�#� i, XTS • i jk' lb y gy IMF • q� '��'b4. NTI IDA i rQC:C:V Xnie-1 INFRARED TECHNOLOGY SERVICES :.k� .ITS .. Date: 09/09/91 1458 Time. Location: Waste Water Treat- ment plant Grit Pump MCC "C" Description: A phase blade switch Tgt Temp: 173 Ambient Temp: 134 Temp Rise: 39 Tape #: 10 counter: 5882 Recommendations: Corrective measures should be taken "r -1 .8i ASAP. r' AVN r, ROUTE ALL WIRES THROUGH WIRE CLIP NONE- PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM INCLUDES ROUTINE THERMAL SCANNING OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. Li iD z CL CL LTJ (Y) CU > Lli U Li T. tY LLJ LLJ F- Li z V) LLJ LIJ L Cl LD 1---4 1:21 V LL -J U I:zl Oj (Y) 4 33: W LJ V) V) CZ Li LTJ 0^ U) V) Li LD Ln F - Ln cy- < 0 4- L.Li W t- F- U (4 CL- C:) 06 Li 0110 U) v- 1!' 4r- p P:l < z < z LLJ t— Qz Li z Ln u LLI LD < 4 z Y< LLI u 06 y _ L, J 7- u Lj Li Z Z z < N �.� C:) i _j Lr) 13- �- Ln C:) PCI %3- 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 X J Cubic Yards of Sludge 1988 1989 1990 1991 Ilk I SLUDGE DISPOSAL BY BENEFICIAL LAND APPLICATION PASTURE LAND BEFORE APPLICATION OF MUNICIPAL SLUDGE THE SAME LAND 3 MONTHS AFTER APPLICATION WASTEWATER COLLECTION STATISTICS Main Line Service Line Stoppages Stoppages 1988-1989 October 5 0 November 5 2 December 11 2 January 10 5 February 9 5 March 4 2 April 10 7 May 9 1 June 6 7 July 5 6 August 2 12 September 6 11 Total 82 60 1989-1990 October 6 21 November 11 10 December 7 17 January 6 14 February 7 7 March 5 11 April 10 5 May 9 1 June 1 7 July 6 6 August 7 5 September 7 5 Total 82 109 1990-1991 October 17 6 November 15 8 December 9 12 January 17 20 February 2 15 March 9 12 April 9 16 May 1 7 June 3 7 July 5 9 August 4 6 September 4 7 Total 95 i i/V *see attached graph mm on so on I ■EMEMBE r� moon r �� SIMMONS moon mom 0i om moon 00.09 p s I Ono R Con 0 ONO 0001001012500 0 00 FAA r . on melanoma. -Mon SEWER TAPS 1990-1991 October 10 November 6 December 7 January 8 February 15 March 29 April 21 May 11 June 16 July 16 August 19 September 9 Total 167 1988-1989 October 10 November 4 December 10 January 9 February 9 March 16 April 17 May 17 June 42 July 16 August 5 September 9 Total 164 s.. .t ` Ne. J 1989-1990 October 11 November 6 December 6 January 9 February 9 March 12 April 19 May 13 June 16 July 19 August 5 September 14 Total 139 *see attached graph ii OR ON CITY OF COLLEGE STATION T.V. INSPECTION SYSTEM The City of College Station T.V. Inspection System was placed in service in January of 1990, and as of the middle October 1991, we have inspected over 150,000 feet of wastewater collection lines as well as several storm sewers and unusually deep manholes. This process has specifically identified numerous sources of infiltration which have since been corrected resulting in a substantial savings in the area of wastewater treatment. The ability to pinpoint exact footages has also saved time and money in the area of collection line repairs or replacement. The table included in this report reflects the approximate monthly footages achieved since the induction of this system. With the aid of the Hansen Wastewater Collection Management System (WC MS) program, we are able to access data on any given line or manhole that has been inspected and generate workorders or reports in a matter of minutes. Equipment usage is input as the workorders are completed, and activity costs are automatically computed and stored. We have included a sample T.V. Inspection Hardcopy as well as a sample Mainline Workorder. We've also included an Activity Cost Report for t.v. inspection from the first of October to date. T.V. INSPECTION STATISTICS 1991 MONTH FOOTAGES January 5,663 February 69020 March 39555 April 59645 May 79601 June 8,939 July 119282 August 39791 September 79755 October 7,825 Total 689076 MONTH FOOTAGES January 49426 February 109493 March 89918 April 29692 May 16,556 June 89910 July 3,362 August 39663 September 5,808 October 4,517 November 29996 December 19215 Total 731,556 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION LINE CLEANING ACTIVITIES This section of our report reflects the line cleaning activities for the City of College Station through our fiscal years from October 1988 to September 1991 and include, not only the washing of various lines, but also root and grease removal. Our Vac -con sewer cleaning system was put into operation in November 1990. Prior to its induction, we relied primarily on a much smaller FMC sewer cleaning unit to handle our washing activities and an Aquatech SR312-39 rodding machine to cope with roots or heavy grease build-up. Since the incorporation of the Vac -con unit, our total line cleaning footage has increased while recurring stoppages have subsequently decreased. This is primarily due to the effectiveness of our root cutter and the vacuum system powered by the Vac -con unit. Workorders and reports for our line cleaning activities are produced and maintained by the Hansen Wastewater Collection Management System (WCMS) and are similar to the workorders and reports produced for the T.V. Inspection System. Please refer to that section for samples of these documents. a LINE CLEANING STATISTICS MONTH FOOTAGES October 19370 November 19777 December 1,922 January 29054 February 29479 March 19234 April 39247 May 1,025 June 5,000 July 5,220 August 79356 September 19315 Total 339999 1990-1991 MONTH FOOTAGES October 69809 November 59122 December 19325 January 29460 February 49760 March 79320 April 89600 May 2,550 June 4,200 July 79889 August 7,570 September 3,300 Total 61,905 1989-1994 MONTH FOOTAGES October 29290 November 2,528 December 1,160 January 5,000 February 69115 March 19851 April 11312 May 89030 June 79764 July 3,669 August 21150 September 910 Total 42,779 HANSEN Wastewater Collection Management System AZX-006 , A2X-005 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION - DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES TV INSPECTION REPORT A2X.-007 , A2X-006 MAIN LINE ACTIVITY COST REPORT A2X-008, A^X-007 i REPORT NO. CRT = 51 Ro PAGE 1 REPORT DATE 10/19/91 10:20 PM AX -250 , AX -205 MANHOLE NUMBERS AX -760 TO AX -355 REQUESTED BY PON SHARP REPORT NO. CRZ451LA '0/11/91 =.0 24.74 94.50 DWN ADDRESS 450: COLLEGE MAIN QUAL SW CORNER IN STREET AX -735 ,5 AREA MAIN TRUNK A; BRANCH 9 LOCATION EASEMENT, POOR ACCESS PAGE 1 SURFACE TREES/SHRUBS PIPE TYPE VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE ACTIVITY TVI FROM 10!01/91 TO 10/19/91 AX -375 , A-09:0 COMPLETED BY RS RON SHARP AX -S85 , AX -780 WEATHER DRY DWN DEPTH 4.3 STRUCTURAL f? 10/10/91 7.5 61.Bh 236.25 VTR FORMAT VHS JOINT LENGTH 4 I/I p ACTIVITY TVI T V INSPECTION TAPE NUMBER FLOW DEPTH 0.0 ROOT 0 10/11/91 i.0 24.74 105.00 VTR INDEX TO MAIN LINE 0 AX -470 , AX -425 SUMMARY: MED. TO HEAVY ROOTS, CRACKS, AND MISALIGNED JOINTS THROUGHOUT LINE MANHOLE NUMBERS TOTAL LABOR EQUIPMENT MATERIALS TOTAL DATE INITIATED HOURS COST COST COST COST Ai -145 , A1-140 /2"W, l' -2'L 0 2 TIME INITIATED 2:00 MANHOLE SOURCE INITIATED BY PRIORITY 211W, ` L 6 10/04/91 S 2-W, `• L o 3.0 24.74 67.50 0.00 112.24 Al -145 , Al -140 PROBLEM 25 ROUTINE INSPECTION AT 0 FEET JT - MEDIUM 0 c MAF REF. NO. DIAMETER 6.00 LENGTH 10/07/91 2.o 17.43 87.50 G. p0 11,4.93 Al -150 Al -145 GROUND WATER LEVEL 0 S - LIGHT 0 1 AREA A9 MAIN TRUNK A; BRANCH 9 LAST TV DATE 09/25/91 - CON5IDERA B-E EVIDENCE 4 !0/07/91 "W, 1' -2"L 2 NUMBER OF LINES 1 i> 6.0 52.29 297.50 0.00 549.79 Al -150 Al -145 FOUND: ROOTS GREASE SOLIDS OTHER CITY OF COLLEGE STATION - DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES , 10/04/91 MAIN LINE ACTIVITY COST REPORT 9.0 74.22 262.50 0.00 336.72 Al -150 , 10/03/91 Ai -145 6.0 52.29 262.50 0.00 714.79 Al -153 10/07/91 , Al -150 3.0 24.74 175.10 u 199.74 Ai -157 , Al -153 PERCENT SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE 16.7 19.1 23.6 DATE COMPLETED COMPLETED BY S2 PERCENT SCHEDULED T.V. INSPECTION 8=.3 60.9 76.4 10/03/91 PERCENT SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE 16.7 19.1 2.6 2.0 17.43 57.50 Al -160 , Al -157 10/03/91 4.0 34.86 175. 00 - HANSEN Wastewater Collection Management System AZX-006 , A2X-005 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION - DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES 10/09/91 7.0 24.74 ?4.5`> TV INSPECTION REPORT A2X.-007 , A2X-006 10/09/91 4.5 =7.12 178.25 REPORT DATE 10/19/91 10: 1T PM REQUESTED BY RON SHARP A2X-008, A^X-007 i REPORT NO. CRT = 51 Ro PAGE 1 10/09/91 3. 0 24.74 98. 00 AX -250 , AX -205 MANHOLE NUMBERS AX -760 TO AX -355 10/i5/91 15.0 123.70 507.50 AX -700 , A-0880 UFS ADDRESS 604 BOYETT ST QUAL NW CNF BY STREET '0/11/91 =.0 24.74 94.50 DWN ADDRESS 450: COLLEGE MAIN QUAL SW CORNER IN STREET AX -735 ,5 AREA MAIN TRUNK A; BRANCH 9 LOCATION EASEMENT, POOR ACCESS 10/09/91 7.5 61.86 276.25 SURFACE TREES/SHRUBS PIPE TYPE VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE AX -'70 , AX -760 PROJECT NG PIPE WIDTH/DIAM 6.00 PIPE DETER N 10/02/91 14.0 122.01 647.50 JOB NUMBER REVERSE SET UF' N SKETCH N AX -375 , A-09:0 TV DATE 09/25/91 LENGTH 582 PRIOR HISTORY N 10/06/91 7.0 24.74 105.00 OPERATOR RS UFS DEPTH 8.0 CONDITION RATINGS: AX -S85 , AX -780 WEATHER DRY DWN DEPTH 4.3 STRUCTURAL f? 10/10/91 7.5 61.Bh 236.25 VTR FORMAT VHS JOINT LENGTH 4 I/I p AX -425 , A-0950 TAPE NUMBER FLOW DEPTH 0.0 ROOT 0 10/11/91 i.0 24.74 105.00 VTR INDEX TO MAIN LINE 0 AX -470 , AX -425 SUMMARY: MED. TO HEAVY ROOTS, CRACKS, AND MISALIGNED JOINTS THROUGHOUT LINE 10/08/91 6.0 49.48 192.50 RECOMMEND ------ C= ENTIRE LINE DESCRIPTION OF CLOCK WEIGHTED PIC DEFECT FOS. FACTOR # CITY OF COLLEGE STATION - DEPARTMENT OF 0 PUBLIC UTILITIES /2"W, > 2'L 6/`..W, MAIN LINE UNSCHEDULED WORE:: � 2•L 6 ORDER 6 LAPSED REPORT NO. CR1751LA 10:2b PM REPORT DATE 10/19/91 FE DATE INITIATED 09/06/91A ACTIVITY TVI T V INSPECTION /2"W, l' -2'L 0 2 TIME INITIATED 2:00 MANHOLE SOURCE INITIATED BY PRIORITY 211W, ` L 6 AS -=60 TO AX -155 F FS RON SnARP S 2-W, `• L o APSED v UFS ADDR 604 BOYETT ST UFS QUAL NW CNR BY STREET DUE TO COLLAPSED FIFE DWN ADDR 4507 COLLEGE MAIN DWN QUAL SW CORNER IN STREET T 2 - _ ri 1 PROBLEM 25 ROUTINE INSPECTION AT 0 FEET JT - MEDIUM 0 c MAF REF. NO. DIAMETER 6.00 LENGTH 112 PIPE TYPE VCR' UPS DEPTH 8.0 DWN DEPTH 4.7 LINE TYPE S MH TYPE JS MH MATERIAL BRA` - SOME EVIDENCE 2 LINE LOCATION EASEMENT, POOR ACCESS CRITICAL RATING - CONS I DERABLE E :' i DENCE u 4 SURFACE COVER TREES/SHRUBS GROUND WATER LEVEL 0 S - LIGHT 0 1 AREA A9 MAIN TRUNK A; BRANCH 9 LAST TV DATE 09/25/91 - CON5IDERA B-E EVIDENCE 4 SUB -AREA "W, 1' -2"L 2 NUMBER OF LINES 1 i> S - LI&HT 1 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: - SOME EVIDENCE - COMMENTS: VIDEO MAINLINE IN NOR•THGATE AS A ROUTINE INSPECTION :CONTINUED) FOUND: ROOTS GREASE SOLIDS OTHER CITY OF COLLEGE STATION - DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES MAIN LINE ACTIVITY COST REPORT REMARKS: REPORT DATE 10/19/91 10:20 PM REQUESTED BY PON SHARP REPORT NO. CR2451LA PAGE _ -- ACTIVITY TVI FROM 10/01./91 TO 10/19%91 JOB CLASS HOURS EQUIPMENT HRS/MILES MATER COMPLETED BY RS RON SHARE' MAIN LINE ACTIVITY COST TOTAL -- AVG. HOURS AVG. COST NO. TOTAL TOTAL ACTIVITY PER JOB PER: JOB JOBS HOURS COST _ - - - _ 5.4 245.17 _. __-.5 7,7S7.SZ PERCENT SCHEDULED T.V. INSPECTION 8s.= 80.9 76.4 PERCENT SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE 16.7 19.1 23.6 DATE COMPLETED COMPLETED BY S2 PERCENT SCHEDULED T.V. INSPECTION 8=.3 60.9 76.4 PERCENT SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE 16.7 19.1 2.6 Wastewater Treatment E'� Wastewater Collection 1990 Training (1710 Total Hours) 1991 Training (1702 Total Hours) ♦ 95% ei 41% 0 Certification ❑Safety M Misc 44%