06-27-96-6-E - Resolution - 06/27/1996q so[ution
NO. 6-27:-_~6-6-E
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR IMPACT FEES FOR THE CITY OF
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS.
WHEREAS, on June 11, 1992, the City Council appointed the City's
Planning and Zoning Commission, as the "Advisory Committee" in Reso-
lution No. 6-11-92-1.10; and
WHEREAS, as required by Section 395.058 of the Texas Local Govern-
ment Code (formerly S.B. 336), the commission includes at least one
representative of the real estate, development or building industry who is
not an employee or official of a political subdivision or governmental
entity; and
WHEREAS, the Advisory Committee has reviewed the City's Land Use
Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Advisory Committee filed written comments on the
amended Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan for
Sanitary Service Area "92-01" on June 4, 1996; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Texas Local Government Code Section
395.0515, a public hearing was held on June 13, 1996, at 7:00 P.M.
which consolidated the hearings for the consideration of the amended
Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan and adopted both
plans and set an amended impact fee simultaneously; and
WHEREAS, information about the Land Use Assumptions and Capital
Improvements Plan was made available to the public on May 1, 1996; and
WHEREAS, all public notice and hearing requirements of Section
395.0515 were met, and no objection was filed by the public to the
consolidation of hearings to consider Land Use Assumptions, Capital
Improvements Plan, and impact fees; and
WHEREAS, the Capital Improvements Plan was prepared based on data
contained in the Land Use Assumptions, attached hereto as Exhibit A;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS that the updated Land Use
Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan for Impact Fees, as set out
Resolution No. 6-27-96-6-E Page 2
in Exhibit A entitled "Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements
Plan, Sanitary Sewer Service Area 92-01" is adopted by the City of
College Station, Texas. The revised impact fee established pursuant to
the updated Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan shall
be effective from and after September 25, 1996.
PASSED and APPROVED this 27th day of June, 1996.
APPROVED
LYNI~ MCILHANEY, Mayor~
ATTEST:
CONNIE HOOKS, City Secretary
EXHIBIT A
Land Use Assumptions
and
Capital Improvements Plan
for
Sanitary Sewer Service Area "92-01"
Executive Summary
Land Use Assumptions & Capital Improvements Plan
Sanitary Sewer Service Area "92-01"
The following report was written to serve as the Land Use and Capital Improvement Plan
update for Sanitary Sewer Service Area "92-01", located north of Graham Road, between
Wellborn Road and SH 6. Sanitary Sewer Service Area "92-01", as shown in Figure 5,
consists of approximately 530 acres of agricultural, industrial, low density residential and
institutional uses. The total number of acres in the sanitary sewer service area has
decreased by 24 acres between 1992 and 1996 due to proposed changes in sewer
discharge directions. The area north of Rock Prairie Road in Edelweiss Estates is
proposed to discharge to another sewer area and can no longer be included in sanitary
sewer service area "92-01".
The land use assumptions, as shown herein, are based on the City's Comprehensive Land
Use Plan, the Edelweiss Estates Master Development Plan for the Lieven J. Van Reit, et al
property and the history of development in this area of the city over the past six years.
Projecting the average growth over the last seven years to the next ten year period (2006)
would result in approximately 600 new single family dwelling units to this service area.
As Edelweiss Estates is presently proposed, it will add 428 new units, while, the area east
of Schaffer Road will add 340 new units. Both areas have been estimated at 3.5 dwelling
units per acre. Assuming that the average rate of growth will rise again within the next ten
year period, it is anticipated that the total 768 dwelling units (Edelweiss and the area east
of Schaffer) will build out in the next ten years.
It is also anticipated that all of the multi-family acreage will build-out between 1996 and
2006. Due to a change in zoning, the number of medium density residential acres
anticipated has decreased from the 1992 projection. In addition, the density at which the
current medium density development is occurring, is well below that originally projected in
the 1992 report.
It is not anticipated that the amount of proposed commercial acreage in the service area
will build out within the ten year period from 1996 to 2006. In addition, the industrial
frontage within the service area, along the south side of Graham Road and east of
Schaffer, is more likely to develop between 2006 and 2016.
The Capital Improvement Plan for Sanitary Sewer Service Area "92-01" was developed
using the Land Use Assumptions for the service area. Originally, it consisted of three
phases, as shown in Figure 7. Phase I, as shown on Figure 8, has been constructed since
the impact fee ordinance was adopted in 1992. It extended a gravity sanitary sewerline
from Graham Road on the southeasterly comer of the service area northerly along the
North Fork of Lick Creek to Schaffer Road, where it now serves part of the Van Reit
property and then westerly along Graham Road to Wellborn Road where it serves
properties on both sides of Graham Road, west of Schaff'er Road. The actual project cost
for this phase was $365,000.
Phase II begins where Phase I intersects Schaffer Road and will extend a sewerline
northerly along Schaffer to connect to the Family Tree lift station and will remove the lift
station from service. This phase will serve a part of the developing Edelweiss Estates
property, the undeveloped part of the Westchester Park Subdivision and provide capacity
for growth in the developed areas and schools. The preliminary estimated project cost is
$138,000. The estimated costs related to the dismantling of the existing lif~ station
represent approximately 4% of the cost of this phase and is not eligible for cost recovery
through impact fees.
Phase III consists of extending a sewefline from the existing line in Graham Road at
Schaffer westerly along the south side of Graham Road for a distance of approximately
1900 feet. It will serve an undeveloped 400 foot depth of property which fronts on the
south side of Graham Road. The preliminary cost estimate is $152,000. The total
estimated cost of these sanitary sewer improvements to serve Sanitary Sewer Service Area
"92-01" is $655,000. These costs include engineering and design, land acquisitions,
construction and project management costs.
The costs subject to impact fees are proportioned by the ratio of new Living Unit
Equivalents (LUE's) to the total Living Equivalents served. Below is the cost allocation
factor used in the impact fee calculation, which has been revised for this 1996 update. The
1992 cost allocation and impact fee calculations are shown below for comparison
purposes.
As shown in the cost allocation tables, both the number of new and total living unit
equivalents served (the equivalent number of single family dwellings) has decreased
significantly since 1992. This is due in part to the decreased acreage of medium density
residential property projected to be developed, the decreased density at which the medium
density property already under construction will develop, and the decrease in total service
area by 24 acres. This means there are less units among which to divide the capital
improvement cost.
1992
Cost Allocation
Total New LUE's .................................................................................. 2588
Total LUE's served ................................................................................ 3258
Cost Allocation Factor ....................................................... 2588/3255 = 0.79
ii
1996
Cost Allocation
Total New '
LUE s .................................................................................. 1752
Total LUE's served ................................................................................ 2544
Cost Allocation Factor ....................................................... 1752/2544 = 0.69
In the area of cost recovery, the estimated cost of the capital improvements has increased
over the last 4 years. The total capital cost of the three (3) phase sewer project has risen
from $543,000 to $655,000. Some of this cost increase has been due to general inflation
in construction costs that have occurred recently. The original cost estimate for Phase I
was $315,000 while the total constructed cost was $365,000, an increase in project cost of
13%. All construction costs have been reestimated for this 1996 update. Inflationary
figures are not typically found in impact fee calculations, as the mandatory land use and
capital improvement plan update is designed to allow you to compensate for these
variables. Phase IFs eligible costs have been increased since 1992. Although some of the
costs that will be incurred with Phase II are not recoverable, such as: the removal of the
existing lit~ station, there is more eligible cost in Phase II than originally estimated.
1992
Cost Recove
Phase Estimated Eligible Service Recovery
Cost Cost Distribution 1992-2002 2002-2012
('92-'02) ('02-'12)
I $315,000 $315,000 65% 35% $204,750 $110,250
H $106,000 $ 53,000 100% $ 53,000
III $122,000 $122,000 100% $122,000
Totals $543,000 $490,000 $257,750 $232,250
111
1996
Cost Recove~
Phase Estimated Eligible Service
Cost Cost Distribution
('96='06) ('06-'16)
Recovery
1996-2006 2006-2016
I $365,000 $365,000 80% 20% $292,000 $ 73,000
II $138,000 $133,000 100% $133,000
III $152,000 $152,000 100% $152,000
Totals $655,000 $650,000 $425,000 $225,000
The revised impact fees, once the changes in land use projections and capital costs have
been calculated, show the maximum impact fee to increase by approximately $130.00 per
LUE.
1992
Impact Fee Calculation
Maximum Impact Fee = Cost x cost allocation factor
number of new LUE's
Maximum Impact Fee = $257,750 X .79 / 1338 = $152.18
I
1996
Impact Fee Calculation
Maximum Impact Fee = Cost x cost allocation factor
number of new LUE's
Maximum Impact Fee = $425,000 X .69 / 1012 = $289.77
iv
Land Use Assumptions & Capital Improvements Plan
Sanitary Sewer Service Area "92-01"
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ........................................................................................ i
List of Figures .............................................................................................. vi
List of Tables .............................................................................................. vii
Land Use Assumptions .................................................................................. 1
Description ............................................................................................... 1
Basis For Assumptions ............................................................................. 2
Capital Improvement Plan ............................................................................ 9
Description ............................................................................................... 9
Existing Facilities (1992) .......................................................................... 9
Existing Facilities (1996) ........................................................................ 12
Projected Facilities - Phase II ................................................................. 15
Projected Facilities - Phase III ................................................................ 16
Service Unit Determination .................................................................... 17
Projected Growth of Living Unit Equivalents .......................................... 19
Impact Fee Calculation ........................................................................... 23
Schedule 1 ................................................................................................... 24
Schedule 2 ................................................................................................... 25
Appendix A ............................................................................................... 26
v
List of Figures
Figure 1:
Figure 2:
Figure 3:
Figure 4:
Figure 5:
Figure 6:
Figure 7:
Figure 8:
Existing Land Uses 1992 ........................................................... 3
Existing Land Uses 1996 ........................................................... 4
Land Use Assumptions 1992 ..................................................... 7
Land Use Assumptions 1996 ..................................................... 8
Sanitary Sewer Service Area "92-01" ...................................... 10
Revised Sanitary Sewer Service Area "92-01" ........................ 11
Capital Improvement Plan - 1992 ............................................ 13
Capital Improvement Plan - 1996 ............................................ 14
List of Tables
Table I:
Table II:
Table III:
Table IV:
Table V:
Table VI:
Table VII:
Table VIII:
Table IX:
Table X:
Table XI:
Table XII:
Table XIII:
Table XIV:
Table XV:
Table XVI:
Existing Land Use ..................................................................... 1
Existing Land Use 1996 ............................................................ 1
Original Growth Projections (1992 to 2002) .............................. 5
Revised Growth Projections (1996 to 2006) .............................. 5
Original Growth Projections (2002 to 2012) .............................. 6
Revised Growth Projections (2006 to 2016) .............................. 6
Phase I Actual Construction Costs ........................................... 12
Phase II Estimated Construction Costs .................................... 15
Phase III Estimated Construction Costs ................................... 16
Living Unit Equivalents (Residential) ..................................... 17
Living Unit Equivalents (Non-Residential) ............................. 18
Projected Densities per Land Use Category ............................. 19
Existing LUE's (1992) ........................................................... 20
Existing LUE's (1996) ........................................................... 20
Original Projected Growth in LUE's (1992-2002) .................. 21
Revised Projected Growth in LUE's (1996-2006) .................. 21
Table XVII: Original Projected Growth in LUE's (2002-2012) .................. 22
Table XVIII:Revised Projected Growth in LUE's (2006-2016) .................. 22
vii
Land Use Assumptions
Sanitary Sewer Service Area "92-01
August 1992
Update: March 1996
Description
Sanitary Sewer Service Area "92-01", as shown in Figure 5, consists of about 530 acres of
agricultural, industrial, low density residential and institutional uses. The acreage of
existing land uses, in 1992, is shown in Table I. Table II is the existing acreage as
updated in 1996. The total number of acres in the sanitary sewer service area decreased
by 24 acres between 1992 and 1996 due to proposed changes in sewer discharge
directions. The area North of Rock Prairie in Edelweiss Estates is proposed to discharge
to a different sewer area and can no longer be included in sanitary sewer service area "92-
01". Acreages throughout do not make allowance for street rights-of-way, the reduction
of developable land due to these is taken into account through densities as described on
page 20.
Existing Land Use 1992
Land Use Gross Acres
Low Density 57
Medium Density 0
Commercial/Industrial 40
Parks 11
Schools 35
Agricultural 387
Total 530
Existing Land Use 1996
Land Use
Low Density
Medium Density
Commercial/Industrial
Parks
Schools
Agricultural
Gross Acres
92
0
4O
22
35
317
Total 506
Basis For Assumptions
The land use assumptions are based on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the
Edelweiss Estates Master Development Plan for the Lieven J. Van Reit, et al property and
the history of development in this area of the city over the past six years. Heavy
residential development has been occurring in this Rock Prairie Road area since 1989.
From 1989 through 1991 there were 248 single family dwellings added to the area. This
constituted 61% (percent) of the single family dwellings added city-wide. In the first four
months of 1992, there were $6 dwellings added in this area compared to 108 city-wide
constituting $2% (percent) of the single family dwelling growth. Since April 1992, 140
new single family dwelling units have been added in the sewer service area, constituting
11% of the city-wide additions.
These additions over the last three years and the first quarter of 1992 averaged 8 dwellings
units per month. From April 1992 to March 1996, this growth slowed to an average of 3
dwellings units per month. Projecting the average growth over the last seven years to the
next ten year period (2006) would result in approximately 600 new dwelling units to this
service area. As Edelweiss Estates is presently proposed, it will add 428 new units.
While, the area east of Schaffer Road will add 340 dwelling units with both estimated at
3.5 dwelling units per acre. Single family densities in the area have averaged between 3.5
and 4.5 dwelling units per acre (depending on whether one includes rights-of-ways in the
calculation). Assuming that the average rate of growth will rise again at some point over
the next ten year period, it is anticipated that the total 768 dwelling units (Edelweiss and
the area east of Schaffer) will build out in the next ten years.
It is also anticipated that all of the multi-family acreage will build-out between 1996 and
2006. Due to a change in zoning, the number of medium density residential acres
anticipated has decreased from the 1992 projection. Approximately 170 multi-family
dwelling units will be added to this area within the next two years.
It is not anticipated that the amount of proposed commercial acreage in the service area
will build out within the ten year period from 1996 to 2006. Existing commercial square
footage city-wide has still not been adequately absorbed since the overbuilding during the
early 1980's. It is reasonable to expect neighborhood commercial uses to accompany the
residential development as it occurs. It is also reasonable to expect this neighborhood
commercial development to occur at the intersection of Rock Prairie Road and Wellborn,
when the extension of Rock Prairie is completed. Staff would anticipate 10 acres of
commercial development from 1996 to 2006 with the remainder being developed fi'om
2006 to 2016.
The Graham Road Industrial area includes 10 acres that are still undeveloped. It is
reasonable to expect this remaining acreage in the industrial area to build-out in the next
ten year window with uses similar to existing ones. The City's Business Park, located
near Greens Prairie Road, is another location for possible industrial growth, however, it is
aimed toward R&D and light manufacturing uses. The City is more aggressive in
attracting economic prospects and the industrial acreage in the service area provides an
alternative location for industrial users, who may not locate in the Business Park. The
industrial frontage within the service area, along the south side of Graham Road and east
of Schaffer, is more likely to develop between 2006 and 2016.
2
figure 1
figure2
The land uses and acreage originally projected to develop within the first ten year window
are shown in Table III. The projected land uses as updated in 1996 are shown in Table
IV.
Original Growth Projections
(March 1992 to 2002)
Projected Development
Low Density Residential:
Edelweiss Estates
C-B to Low Density
Area East of Schaffer
Low Density Subtotal:
Gross Acres
124
8
86
218
Medium Density Residential
Commercial/Industrial
Parks
Total:
25
20
274
Revised Growth Projections
(March 1996 to 2006)
Pro,iected Development
Low Density Residential:
Edelweiss Estates
C-B to Low Density
Area East of Schaffer
Low Density Subtotal:
Gross Acres
107
8
97
212
Medium Density Residential
Commercial/Industrial
Parks
20
10
Total: 242
The land uses and acreage originally projected to develop during the second ten year
window are shown in Table V. The 1996 update for the second ten years is shown on
Table VI.
Original Growth Projections
(2002 to 2012)
Projected Development
Commercial/Industrial
Medium Density Residential
Total:
Gross Acres
89
113
Revised Growth Projections
(2006 to 2016)
Projected Development
Gross Acres
Commercial/Industrial
74
Total: 74
6
figure 3
figure 4
Capital Improvement Plan
Sanitary Sewer Service Area "92-01"
August 1992
Update: March 1996
Description
The Sanitary Sewer Service Area "92-01", as discussed on page 1, has decreased by
approximately 24 acres, as shown on Figures 5 and 6. The difference occurs in the area
north of Rock Prairie Road and west of Westchester Park. This area, according to recent
master planning efforts will sewer toward the north to another sewer area. Although there
has been a decrease in the sewer area, the sewerlines constructed to serve this area will not
change in size.
The Capital Improvement Plan for Sanitary Sewer Service Area "92-01" was developed
using the Land Use Assumptions for the service area. Originally, it consisted of three
phases, as shown in Figure 7. Since the original report was written in 1992, construction
has been completed on Phase I of the three phase improvement plan.
Existing Facilities (1992):
Sanitary sewer service area "92-01" is located within the North Fork of Lick Creek
drainage basin. This basin is currently provided sanitary sewer service through an existing
18" gravity sanitary sewerline which is built from the intersection of South Graham and
the Utility Service Center road to a lif~ station at the intersection of the creek and SH 6.
Sewage is pumped from the lit~ station into the Bee Creek basin, where it then flows to the
City's Carter Creek Wastewater Plant for treatment. These existing facilities are all
outside Sanitary Sewer Service Area "92-01". Cost recovery related to the existing
treatment plant and the existing sanitary sewerline, as described above, are not being
considered within this service area at this time.
The city currently operates and maintains the Family Tree lift station, located just south of
and adjacent to Rock Prairie Junior High School, and sanitary sewerlines within the
service area which provide sanitary sewer service to Brandon Heights Phase I, Williams
Court, Westchester Park I, Rock Prairie Elementary School and Rock Prairie Junior High
School. Cost recovery for these existing facilities is not being considered within this
service area.
figure 5
10
figure 6
11
Existing Facilities (1996):
Phase I, as shown on Figure 8, has been constructed since the impact fee was adopted. It
extended a gravity sanitary sewedine from Graham Road on the southeasterly comer of
the service area northerly along the North Fork of Lick Creek to Schaffer Road, where it
now serves part of the Van Reit property (when Phase II is completed, this portion of
Phase I will also serve existing developed areas of Brandon Heights Phase I, Williams
Court, Westchester Park I, the two schools and the city park in the area. Phase I then
continued along Schaffer, southerly to Graham Road, and then westerly along Graham
Road to Wellborn Road where it serves properties on both sides of Graham Road, west of
Schaffer Road. The actual project cost for this phase was $365,000, which included the
following:
PHASE I
ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Item Cost
Construction
Engineering/Land Surveying
Land Acquisition
Total
$307,000
$ 47,000
$11,ooo
$365,000
This sewerline, as constructed, provides capacity for existing land uses and new
residential, commercial and industrial development which is projected to occur through the
year 2016.
12
figure 7
13
figure 8
14
Projected Facilities
Phase I1
Phase II begins where Phase I intersects Scha_ff'er Road and will extend a sewerline
northerly along Schaffer to connect to the Family Tree lit~ station. This phase will serve a
part of the developing Edelweiss Estates property, the undeveloped part of the
Westchester Park Subdivision and provide capacity for growth in the developed areas and
schools. The preliminary estimated project cost is $138,000 which includes the following:
PHASE H
ES TIMA TED CONS TR UC TION COS TS
Item Cost
Construction $ 83,000
Construction (Remove Lif~ Station) $ 5,000
Engineering/Land Surveying $ 18,000
Land Acquisition $ 14,000
Total $138,000
The estimated cost related to the dismantling of the existing lit~ station represent
approximately 4% of the cost of this phase and is not eligible for cost recovery through
impact fees. This phase will serve existing residential land uses, new residential areas and
commercial development which is projected to occur between 1996 and 2006.
15
Projected Facilities
Phase III
Phase HI consists of extending a sewerline from the existing line in Graham Road at
Schaff'er westerly along the south side of Graham Road for a distance of approximately
1900 feet. It will serve an undeveloped 400 foot depth of property which fronts on the
south side of Graham Road. The preliminary cost estimate is $152,000, which includes
the following:
PHASE III
ES TIMA TED CONS TR UC TION COS TS
Item
Construction
Engineering/Land Surveying
Land Acquisition
Cost
$ 96,000
$ 19,000
$18,ooo
Total $152,000
Phase III provides sanitary sewer service to this currently vacant area for industrial
development, which is projected to occur between 2006 and 2016.
The total estimated cost of these sanitary sewer improvements to serve Sanitary Sewer
Service Area "92-01" is $655,000. These costs include engineering and design, land
acquisitions, construction and project management costs. Although state law permits the
inclusion of interest charges and other financing costs in the capital improvements plan,
such costs have not been included in this report. Because projects costs are to be adjusted
through the amendment process mandated by state law, no inflationary factor has been
included in the project estimates.
16
Service Unit Determination
The City of College Station has selected the Living Unit Equivalent as the appropriate
measure of wastewater service consumption by new development in Sanitary Sewer
Service Area "92-01". As used in the Capital Improvement Plan, a "service unit" is
defined as single family residence without regard for the number of bedrooms. A 5/8"
(inch) water meter is the typical size water meter serving a single family residence in the
city. Since water use is directly related to sanitary sewer discharge, the water meter size
will be used to determine Living Unit Equivalents for nonresidential land uses. The 5/8"
(inch) meter is considered one unit. Other meter sizes are proportioned Living Unit
Equivalents according to their flow relationship to the 5/8" (inch) meter. Living Unit
Equivalents for residential structures are shown in Table X, while those for non-residential
structures is shown in Table XI.
Living Unit Equivalents
Residential Structures
Type of Structure
Single Family Dwelling
(all sizes/no, of bedrooms)
Duplex
(all sizes/no, of bedrooms)
Triplex
(all sizes/no, of bedrooms)
Fourplex
(all sizes/no, of bedrooms)
Multi-family
(one and two bedroom units)
(three and more bedroom units)
Mobile Home
(space)
Unit LUE
Structure 1
Duplex 2
Triplex 3
Fourplex 4
Unit 0.75
Unit 1
Mobile Home 0.75
17
Living Unit Equivalents
Non-residential Structures
Meter Size
LUE/Meter Size
5/8 inch simple 1
3/4 inch simple 1.5
1 inch simple 2.5
1 1/2 inch simple 5
:2 inch simple 8
2 inch compound 8
2 inch turbine 10
3 inch compound 16
3 inch turbine 24
4 inch compound 25
4 inch turbine 42
6 inch compound 50
8 inch compound 80
6 inch turbine 92
10 inch compound 115
8 inch turbine 160
10 inch turbine 250
12 inch turbine 330
18
Projected Growth of Living Unit Equivalents
It is necessary to establish relationships between Living Unit Equivalents and the various
land uses. The following density relationships have been determined at, er a review of
developed land uses within the city, a comparison of consumption rates of each land use
category and comparisons with design recommendations of the American Society of Civil
Engineers. The service unit to be applied is a typical single family dwelling without regard
to the number of bedrooms. Such a unit is otherwise referred to as a "dwelling unit" and
for the purpose of this plan the two terms are interchangeable.
Projected Densities Per Land Use Category
Land Use Category Dwelling Units Per Acre
Low Density Residential 3.5
Medium Density Residential 15 ~
Commercial / Industrial 10
Parks 0
Schools 2
Agricultural 0
~ Medium density residential land uses currently within the service area are developing as
retirement/assisted living conununities at 8.5 dwelling units/acre. This number in comparison to the
average medium density residential is too low to be used in computing projected densities for this type of
land use.
19
The existing land use acreages and living unit equivalents as of the original writing in 1992
are shown in Table XIII. The existing land use acreages and living unit equivalents as
updated in 1996 are shown in Table XIV.
Existing L UE'$
(1992)
Land Use Acres LUE/Acre LUE's
Low Density Residential 57 3.5 200
Medium Density Residential 0 0 0
Commercial / Industrial 40 10 400
Parks 11 0 0
Schools 35 2 70
Agricultural 387 0 0
Totals 530 670
Existing L UE'S
(1996)
Land Use Acres LUE/Acre LUE's
Low Density Residential 92 3.5 322
Medium Density Residential 0 0 0
Commercial / Industrial 40 10 400
Parks 22 0 0
Schools 35 2 70
Agricultural 317 0 0
Totals 506 792
20
The acreages and living unit equivalents originally projected to develop within the first ten
year window are shown in Table XV. The projected acreages and living unit equivalents
as updated in 1996 are shown in Table XVI.
Original Projected Growth in L UE's
(1992 - 2002)
Land Use Acres LUE/Acre LUE's
Low Density Residential 218 3.5 763
Medium Density Residential 25 15 375
Commercial / Industrial 20 10 200
Parks 11 0 0
Schools 0 0 0
Agricultural 0 0 0
Totals 274 1338
Revised Projected Growth in LUE's
(1996 - 2006)
Land Use Acres LUE/Acre LUE's
Low Density Residential 212 3.5 742
Medium Density Residential 20 8.5 2 170
Commercial / Industrial 10 10 100
Parks 0 0 0
Schools 0 0 0
Agricultural 0 0 0
Totals 242 1012
See foomote #1.
21
The acreages and living unit equivalents originally projected to develop during the second
ten year window are shown in Table XVII. The 1996 update for the second ten years is
shown on Table XVIII.
Original Projected Growth in L UE's
(2002- 20 2)
Land Use Acres LUE/Acre LUE's
Low Density Residential 0 0 0
Medium Density Residential 24 15 360
Commercial / Industrial 89 10 890
Parks 0 0 0
Schools 0 0 0
Agricultural O 0 0
Totals 113 1250
Revised Projected Growth in LUE's
(2006 - 2016)
Land Use Acres LUE/Acre LUE's
Low Density Residential 0 0 0
Medium Density Residential 0 15 0
Commercial / Industrial 74 10 740
Parks 0 0 0
Schools 0 0 0
Agricultural O 0 0
Totals 74 740
22
Impact Fee Calculation
The costs subject to impact fees are proportioned by the ratio of new Living Unit
Equivalents to the total Living Equivalents served. Below is the cost allocation factor
used in the impact fee calculation, this cost allocation has been revised for this 1996
update. In addition, outlined below is the eligible cost and cost recovery allowable for the
recovery periods. The maximum impact fee as revised with this report is also listed below
and has been calculated at $289.77. The 1992 cost allocation, cost recovery and impact
fee calculations have been retained in this report as Appendix A for reference purposes.
Cost Allocation
(1996 Revised)
Total New LUE's .................................................................................. 1752
Total LUE's served ................................................................................ 2544
Cost Allocation Factor ....................................................... 1752/2544 = 0.69
Cost Recovery,
(1996 Revised)
Phase Estimated Eligible Service Recovery
Cost Cost Distribution 1996-2006 2006-2016
('96-'06) ('06-'16)
I $365,000 $365,000 80% 20% $292,000 $ 73,000
II $138,000 $133,000 100% $133,000
III $152,000 $152,000 100% $152,000
Totals $655,000 $650,000 $425,000 $225,000
Impact Fee Calculation
(1996 Revised)
Maximum Impact Fee = Cost x cost allocation factor
number of new LUE's
Maximum Impact Fee = $425,000 X .69 / 1012 = $289.77
23
Schedule 1
Maximum Impact Fee Per Service Unit
Service Area
Roadway Facilities:
(reserved)
Service Unit
Max Impact Fee
Water Facilities:
(reserved)
Sanitary Sewer Facilities:
92-01 .................................................... LUE ............................................ $289.77
Drainage Facilities
(reserved)
24
Schedule 2
Impact Fees To Be Paid Per Service Unit
(Effective Date September 26, 1996)
Service Area
Service Unit
Max Impact Fee
Roadway Facilities:
(reserved)
Water Facilities
(reserved)
Sanitary Sewer Facilities:
92-01 .................................................... LUE ............................................... $289.77
Drainage Facilities:
(reserved)
25
Appendix A
1992
Cost Allocation
Total NewLUE's .................................................................................. 2588
Total LUE's served ................................................................................ 3258
Cost Allocation Factor ....................................................... 2588/3255 = 0.79
1992
Cost Recovery
Phase Estimated Eligible Service
Cost Cost Distribution
('92-'02) ('02-'12)
Recovery
1992-2002 2002-2012
I $315,000 $315,000 65% 35%
II $106,000 $ 53,000 100%
IH $122,000 $122,000 100%
Totals $543,000 $490,000
$204,750 $110,250
$ 53,000
$122,000
$257,750 $232,250
1992
Impact Fee Calculation
Maximum Impact Fee = Cost x cost allocation factor
number of new LUE's
Maximum Impact Fee = $257,750 X .79 / 1338 = $152.18
I
26