Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
09/05/2013 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning Commission
C-4q *-A- 44r� CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home of Texas A&M University' Planning & Zoning Commission September 5, 2013 City Hall Council Chambers 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas Workshop Meeting 6:00 PM Regular Meeting 7:00 PM (*Orq" AGENDA CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home ofTexasA&M University` PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MEETING SEPTEMBER 5,20139 AT 6:00 PM CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 1. Call the meeting to order. 2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. 3. Discussion of Minor and Amending Plats approved by Staff. • Final Pat — Minor — Richards Addition Lots 29-30 — 2 Lots — 102, 104, 106, 108 Richards Street Case# 13-00900115 (J.Paz) • Final Plat —Minor — Graham Road Industrial Park— 1 Lot— 833 Graham Road Case # 13-00900136 (T.Rogers) • Final Plat — Minor — Graham Corner Plaza — 1846 Graham Road Case # 13-900126 (T.Rogers) 4. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. [New Development List] 5. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the status of items within the 2013 P&Z Plan of Work(see attached). (J.Schubert) 6. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a brief overview of impact fees and the upcoming Impact Fee Update Report. (C.Cotter) 7. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a Semi-Annual Report on Impact Fees 92-01, 97-01, 97-0213, 99-01, and 03-02 (C.Cotter) 8. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an update on the following item: • A rezoning of approximately 59 acres for the property located at 3100 Haupt Road from PDD (Planned Development District) to PDD (Planned Development District) with additional uses and amendments to the previously approved concept plan for the Barracks IL The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August 1St and voted 6-0 to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on August 22nd and voted 6-0-1 to approve the rezoning. 9. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings. • Thursday, September 12, 2013 — City Council Meeting — Council Chambers — Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. (Liaison—Gay) • Thursday, September 19, 2013 — P&Z Meeting — Council Chambers — Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. 10. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, Joint Parks / Planning & Zoning Subcommittee, South Knoll Area Neighborhood Plan Resource Team, BioCorridor Board, and Zoning District Subcommittee. 11. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 12. Adjourn. Consultation with Attorney IGov't Code Section 551.0711;possible action. The Planning and Zoning Commission may seek advice from its attorney regarding a pending and contemplated litigation subject or attorney-client privileged information.After executive session discussion,any final action or vote taken will be in public.If litigation or attorney-client privileged information issues arise as to the posted subject matter ofthis Planning and Zoning Commission meeting,an executive session will be held. Notice is hereby given that a Workshop Meeting of the College Station Planning&Zoning Commission,College Station,Texas will be held on September 5, 2013 at 6:00 PM at City Hall Council Chamber,1101 Texas Avenue,College Station,Texas.The following subjects will be discussed,to wit: See Agenda. Posted this the day of August,2013,at CITY OF COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS By Sherry Mashburn,City Secretary By Kathy Merrill,Interim City Manager 1,the undersigned,do hereby certify that the above Notice of the Workshop Meeting of the Planning&Zoning Commission of the City of College Station, Texas,is a true and correct copy of said Notice and that I posted a true and correct copy of said notice on the bulletin board at City Hall,1101 Texas Avenue,in College Station,Texas,and the City's website,www.cstx.gov.The Agenda and Notice are readily accessible to the general public at all times.Said Notice and Agenda were posted on August ,2013,at and remained so posted continuously for at least 72 hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting. This public notice was removed from the official posting board at the College Station City Hall on the following date and time: by Dated this day of 2013. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS By Subscribed and sworn to before me on this the day of ,2013. Notary Public-Brazos County,Texas My commission expires: This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call(979)764-3541 or(TDD)1-800-735-2989. Agendas may be viewed on www.cstx.gov.Planning and Zoning Commission meetings are broadcast live on Cable Access Channel 19. AGENDA CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Howe of Texas A&M University' REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 5,20139 AT 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 1. Call meeting to order. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Hear Citizens. At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address the Commission on planning and zoning issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The citizen presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.) All matters listed under Item 4, Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Planning & Zoning Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. There will not be separate discussion of these items. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it will be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration. 4. Consent Agenda 4.1 Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve Meeting Minutes. • August 15, 2013 —Workshop • August 15, 2013 —Regular 4.2 Consideration, discussion, and possible action on Absence Requests from meetings. • Vergel Gay —August 15, 2013 • Jim Ross — September 5, 2013 4.3 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Great Oaks Phase 1B consisting of 2 residential lots on approximately 3.03 acres generally located north of Great Oaks Drive in the Great Oaks Subdivision. Case#13-00900147 (M.Hester) 4.4 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Preliminary Plan for Shenandoah Phase 15 consisting of 86 residential lots on approximately 28.41 acres located at 4160 Alexandria Avenue, generally located between Shenandoah Phases 14 and 8B. Case#13-00900155 (T.Rogers) 4.5 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Preliminary Plan for Pebble Creek Phases 7C & 7D consisting of 134 residential lots on approximately 84.4 acres located at 1320 Royal Adelade Loop, generally located east of Pebble Creek Parkway and south of Pebble Creek Phases 7A & 7B. Case #13-00900103 (T.Rogers) Regular Agenda 5. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. 6. Public hearing,presentation,possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Castlegate II Sec. 202 Lots 1R, 2R and Common Area A, Block 11 and Common Area B, Block 17, being a replat of Castlegate II Sec. 202, Lots 1, 2, and Common Area, Block 11 and a Final Plat of Common Area B, Block 17 on approximately 3.1 acres located at 4600 & 4602 Tonbridge Drive and more generally located along Greens Prairie Road West at the entrance to the Castlegate II Subdivision. Case#13-00900154 (M.Robinson) 7. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Saddle Creek Phase 6 and Phase 7B Lot 149R1 being a replat of Saddle Creek Phase 7B Lot 149R and a 1.3 acre tract in the James C. Stuteville League, consisting of 16 residential lots on approximately 25.55 acres generally located northeast of Saddle Creek Drive in Saddle Creek Subdivision, located west of Duck Haven Subdivision, approximately one mile south of Greens Prairie Road in the City's Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. Case #13- 00900146 (M.Hester) 8. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an amendment to Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance", Section 4.2, "Official Zoning Map" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by rezoning 1.35 acres in Oak Terrace Addition, Lots 11-16, Block 12, 1.46 acres in Tauber Subdivision, Lots 1-5 & 16-20 and associated BPP, Block 4, and 1.02 acres in Ramparts Subdivision, Part of Tracts C & D, recorded in Volume 10683, Page 240 of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas and Nagle Street right-of-way between these properties, generally located at 601 Cross Street, 700 Cross Street, and 402 Nagle Street from NG-3 Residential Northgate to NG-2 Transitional Northgate. Case#13-00900165 (T.Rogers) (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the September 26, 2013 City Council Meeting - subject to change) 9. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Sections 12-8.3.E, "Streets," and 12-8.3.G, "Blocks," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas to amend street network and block length requirements. Case #13-00900141 (J.Schubert) (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the September 12, 2013 City Council Meeting -subject to change) 10. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by the creation and amendment of one- and two-family residential zoning districts in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Case#13-00900030 (J.Prochazka) (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the September 12, 2013 City Council Meeting -subject to change) 11. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending the College Station Comprehensive Plan by adopting the Economic Development Master Plan. Case#13-00900143 (B.Cowell) (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the September 12,2013 City Council Meeting -subject to change) 12. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 13. Adjourn. Consultation with Attorney IGov't Code Section 551.0711;possible action. The Planning and Zoning Commission may seek advice from its attorney regarding a pending and contemplated litigation subject or attorney-client privileged information. After executive session discussion,any fmal action or vote taken will be in public. If litigation or attorney-client privileged information issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting,an executive session will be held. Notice is hereby given that a Regular Meeting of the College Station Planning&Zoning Commission,College Station,Texas will be held on September 5, 2013 at 7:00 p.m.at City Hall Council Chambers,1101 Texas Avenue,College Station,Texas. The following subjects will be discussed,to wit: See Agenda. Posted this the day of August,2013,at CITY OF COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS By: Sherry Mashburn,City Secretary By: Kathy Merrill,Interim City Manager I,the undersigned,do hereby certify that the above Notice of Meeting of the Planning&Zoning Commission of the City of College Station,Texas,is a true and correct copy of said Notice and that I posted a true and correct copy of said notice on the bulletin board at City Hall,1101 Texas Avenue,in College Station,Texas,and the City's website,www.cstx.gov. The Agenda and Notice are readily accessible to the general public at all times. Said Notice and Agenda were posted on August_2013,at and remained so posted continuously for at least 72 hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting. This public notice was removed from the official posting board at the College Station City Hall on the following date and time: by Dated this day of 2013. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION,TEXAS By Subscribed and sworn to before me on this the day of 2013. Notary Public-Brazos County,Texas My commission expires: This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call(979)764-3541 or(TDD)1-800-735-2989. Agendas may be viewed on www.cstx.¢ov.Planning and Zoning Commission meetings are broadcast live on Cable Access Channel 19. 2013 Planning & Zoning Commission Plan of Work Comprehensive Plan Implementation Implementation of Adopted Plans Summary: Project Dates: Implementation of adopted master plans and 2/14/13: Council discussion regarding board neighborhood, district, and corridor plans, namely: compositions for Medical District MMD#1 . Central College Station, Eastgate, and Southside Area 6/20/2013: Discussion regarding CIP development neighborhood plans, and Bicycle, Pedestrian, and process at P&Z Regular meeting. Greenways, Parks and Recreation, Water, Waste 7/18/13: Recommendation for FY14 CIP proposal at Water, and Medical District master plans. P&Z Regular meeting. Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff JAnticipated Completion: On-going Wellborn Community Plan Summary: Project Dates: Development of a district plan for the recently annexed 4/1/13: Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Wellborn area that contains elements of a rural historic Board recommended approval of the Plan. community with a unique character that residents of the 4/4/13: P&Z recommended approval of proposed plan. area desire to retain. 4/25/13: Council adopted plan. Staff Assigned: M. Robinson Completed: April 2013 Economic Development Master Plan Summary: Project Dates: Development of a Master Plan to provide consistent 2/7/13: Master Plan update at P&Z Workshop. direction on how the City will help ensure its economic 7/18/13: P&Z Workshop on draft Master Plan. health for years to come while providing a positive 9/5/13: P&Z consideration and recommendation business development environment. regarding proposed plan. 9/12/13: Council consideration of plan adoption. Staff Assigned: R. Heye JAnticipated Completion: Summer 2013 South Knoll Area Neighborhood Plan Summary: Project Dates: 5/21/13: Neighborhood Resource Team meeting. Development of a neighborhood plan for a number of 7/9/13: Plan Open House in Council Chambers. unique neighborhood areas. The plan area is generally bounded by Holleman Drive, Welsh Avenue, Wellborn 7/16/13: Neighborhood Resource Team meeting in Road, Harvey Mitchell Parkway, and Texas Avenue. Council Chambers at 6:30pm. 8/1/13: Delivery of draft plan at P&Z Workshop. 8/5/13: Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board recommendation on proposed plan. 8/15/13: P&Z recommendation approval of plan with some conditions. 9/26/13: Council consideration of plan adoption. Staff Assigned: J. Prochazka, M. Hester JAnticipated Completion: Summer 2013 Page 1 of 4 Neighborhood Parking Summary: Project Dates: Analyze neighborhood parking issues by engaging 2/21/13: Task Force Final Report presented to P&Z. stakeholders and working in a Joint Task Force 2/28/13: Task Force Final Report presented to Subcommittee with Council. Implement recommended Council. solutions. 7/9/13-8/5/13: Stakeholder comment period. 9/5/13: P&Z consideration and recommendation of proposed ordinance. 9/12/13: Council consideration of proposed ordinance. Staff Assigned: B. Cowell, T. Rogers JAnticipated Completion: Summer 2013 Residential Zoning Districts Summary: Project Dates: Create and adopt new residential zoning districts to 4/9/13: Public meeting regarding single family and implement the future land use and character duplex zoning concepts. designations identified in the Comprehensive Plan. 4/19/13: P&Z Subcommittee meeting. 5/31/13: P&Z Subcommittee meeting. 6/7/13-7/7/13: Stakeholder comment period for draft zoning ordinance changes. 9/5/13: P&Z consideration and recommendation of proposed ordinance. 9/12/13: Council consideration of proposed ordinance. Staff Assigned: J. Prochazka, T. Rogers JAnticipated Completion: Summer 2013 Medical District Zoning Districts Summary: Project Dates: Create and adopt Medical and Urban Village zoning 5/2/13: Presentation regarding Plan implementation at districts to implement the new future land use and P&Z Workshop. character designations established by the Medical 8/15/13: Presentation of district concepts at P&Z District Master Plan. I Workshop. Staff Assigned: J. Prochazka, M. Robinson JAnticipated Completion: Research and Education Plan Implementation Summary: Project Dates: The linkage between the Comprehensive Plan, Master Plans, and Neighborhood, District, and Corridor Plans. The linkage between regulations, funding, etc and plan implementation. • Overview of concept—provide a review of how this 5/2/13: Discussion at P&Z Regular meeting. system is built in College Station and intended to be used (link between vision, comprehensive plan, strategic plan, etc). Page 2 of 4 Link between Comprehensive Plan and Master Plans 5/2/13: Discussion at P&Z Regular meeting. —this would include an overview of each of the adopted Master Plans and a demonstration of how for example we plan wastewater to serve the proposed land use and how for example the BPG Master Plan, if implemented responds to the desired character of the City, etc. Link between adopted plans and regulations/ 6/6/13: Discussion at P&Z Workshop. standards —this would include examples of how we use regs (for example new zoning districts or block length) to further the objectives/goals contained in the policy documents/plans and to help highlight how the success of those plans is impacted by the regs selected (or not) —for example how a certain type of block length yields a certain development pattern and connectivity whereas a different block length will yield a different pattern. Link between plans and funding—this would include 6/20/13: Discussion at P&Z Regular meeting. how the plans have been fiscally constrained and how funding plays a role in their successful implementation and how if not adequately funded they will fall short of expectations. Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff JAnticipated Completion: Character and Community Design Summary: Project Dates: The purpose and definition of community character, community design, and the role they play in community vitality and success. Overview of community character (versus just a focus 5/16/13: Discussion at P&Z Workshop. on land use/protection from incompatible uses)—this would include an overview of what our plans say about this and again what best practices are in these areas. Link between community design and livability—this 9/2013: Discussion at P&Z. would be an overview of what the principles of good community design are, where these principles have (or have not) been used in College Station and where livability has been improved (or negatively impacted)as a result. Link between community design and economic vitality 9/2013: Discussion at P&Z. —this would be an overview of how community design impacts land values (and thus tax revenues)creates new economic opportunities, etc. Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff JAnticipated Completion: Page 3 of 4 Affordable Housing and Community Development Summary: Project Dates: Receive updates regarding affordable housing and other community development efforts. Overview of the City's current approach to addressing 7/18/13: Discussion at P&Z Workshop. affordable housing needs. Overview of the Department's revised approach to 7/18/13: Discussion at P&Z Workshop. community development—this would be an overview of a Community Development Master Plan. On-going updates as needed (annual action plan, 8/8/13: Council adopted Annual Action Plan. Community Development Master Plan, etc). Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff JAnticipated Completion: On-going Single-Family and Multi-Family Housing Markets Summary: Project Dates: Discuss impact of large amount of new multi-family units and single-family dwellings being used for student rental purposes on the local housing market. Overview of the issue/questions —this would be an 5/16/13: Discussion of methodology and scope at P&Z overview of what the perceived issues/questions are Regular meeting. and what others might have looked at in other communities when asking similar questions to devise a methodology. Overview of the new multi-family market—this would be what is being built, by whom, how are they performing, who is moving into them, etc. may include surveys, focus groups, guest speakers, etc. Overview of existing multi-family market—this would be what exists, who owns it, what are they doing to maintain and rent it, how are they performing, who is moving into them, etc. may include surveys, focus groups, guest speakers, etc. Overview of the single-family rental market—what is being built, who is managing what and how, who is renting, what are the implications/benefits of this market, etc. may include surveys, focus groups, guest speakers, etc. What, if any, response are needed/appropriate by the City to address issues. Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff Anticipated Completion: Page 4 of 4 (*Orq" CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM DATE: September 5, 2013 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Carol Cotter, P.E., Sr. Asst. City Engineer SUBJECT: Impact Fee Overview A report to update the City's current impact fees is nearing completion and will be presented to you in the coming weeks. This workshop item is a brief overview of our Impact Fees and the upcoming Impact Fee Update Report so that you have some exposure to what will be asked of you as the Impact Fee Advisory Committee. (*Orq" CITY OF COLLEGE STATION 1101 Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM DATE: September 5, 2013 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Carol Cotter, P.E., Sr. Asst. City Engineer SUBJECT: Semi-Annual Report — Impact Fees 92-01 , 97-01, 97-0213, 99-01, 03-02 Local Government Code requires semi-annual reporting in order to monitor the progress of impact fees and to determine when and update to the fee study is necessary. An update was recommended and is currently under way. There have been no major changes over the last reporting period. Staff recommends that the Advisory Committee forward this report to City Council for their status update. The City of College Station Ordinance Chapter 15, Impact Fees, designates the Planning and Zoning Commission as the Advisory Committee for review, advisement, and monitoring of proposed and existing impact fees. More specifically, the Advisory Committee is established to: 1 . Advise and assist the City in adopting Land Use assumptions. 2. Review the Capital Improvements Plan and file written comments. 3. Monitor and evaluate implementation of the Capital Improvements Plan. 4. File semi-annual reports with respect to the progress of the Capital Improvements Plan. 5. Advise the City Council of the need to update or revise the Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvements Plan, and Impact Fees. Currently the City of College Station has five impact fees in existence of which all associated construction is complete. All five of the impact fees underwent a 5-Year Update in either 2008 or 2009 (as noted below) in accordance with State Law. The following is a current status report for each of the five impact fees. (To facilitate review data changes from previous 6 months are presented in bold font.): 92-01 Sanitary Sewer ( Graham Road ) ( 508 ac. ) $316.07/LUE This fee was initially implemented in 1992 at $152.18 /LUE and was revised in 1996 to $289.77/LUE after approval of updated Land use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan (CIP), revised again to the $232.04/LUE in 2000 and to the current amount in April of 2008. The CIP consists of three phases originally estimated at $543,000 which have all been completed at a combined cost of $473,518.72. Fees collected over the last 6 months are $2,528.56 for total amount of$327,611.11 (per Account #250-0000-287.51-13). The remaining amount eligible for collection is about $14,102. The total amount to be recovered through impact fees is anticipated at 72% of original construction cost. 97-01 Sanitary Sewer ( Spring Creek — Pebble Hills ) ( 2000 ac.) $98.39/LUE This fee was implemented in December 1997 at $349.55/LUE and was revised to the current amount in April of 2008. The CIP consists of Phase I (east of Hwy 6 ) and Phase 11 (west of Hwy 6 ). Phase I estimated to cost $1,000,000 was completed in 1999 at a cost of $631 ,214.59. Phase II was estimated to cost $1,350,000 and was completed at a cost of$813,752.00. The total actual cost was $1,444,966.59. Fees collected over the last 6 months are $8,953.49 for total amount of$587,215.33 (per Acct #251-0000-287.51-13). The remaining amount eligible for collection is about $172,239. The total amount to be recovered through impact fees is anticipated at 52% of original construction cost. 97-02B Sanitary Sewer ( Alum Creek— Nantucket ) ( 608 ac. ) $59.42/LUE This fee was implemented in December 1997 at $243.38/LUE and was revised to the current amount in April of 2008. The CIP consisted of running a 15" sanitary sewer line from the south end of the College Station Business Park westerly along Alum Creek to the east ROW of Highway 6. The project was estimated to cost $390,000 and was completed in 1999 at a cost of$214,270.87. Fees collected over the last 6 months are $178.26 for total amount of$22,425.17 (per Acct #252- 0000-287.51-13). The remaining amount eligible for collection is about $181,358. The total amount to be recovered through impact fees is anticipated at 95% of original construction cost. 99-01 Water ( Harley )( 158 ac. ) $769.91/LUE This fee was implemented in April 1999 at $550.00/LUE and was revised to the current amount in April of 2008. The CIP consists of running an 18" water line south along the east ROW of Highway 6 approximately 4800'. The line was estimated to cost $312,000 (the impact fee is based on an 8" line @ $165,000). A 2400' section of the 18" line was constructed in 1999 from the south end at a total cost of $342,977.73. Fees collected over the last 6 months are $0.00 for total amount of $64,740.88 (per Acct #240-0000-287.51-13). The remaining amount eligible for collection is about $246,372. The total amount to be recovered through impact fees is anticipated at 91% of original construction cost. 03-02 Sanitary Sewer ( Steeplechase ) ( 715 ac. ) $357.74/LUE This fee was initially implemented in June 2003 at $300.00/LUE and was revised to the current amount in May of 2009. This CIP was constructed in two phases of sanitary sewer line construction in compliance with the proposed construction in the original report establishing the fee. Phase one crossed Wellborn Road and terminated at Old Wellborn Road consisting of 2,347 linear feet of 18 inch sewer line with a construction cost of$296,642. Phase two was completed in 2006 and continued the line along Old Wellborn Road and terminated across RPR West. Phase two consisted of 6,281 linear feet of 12 inch line and 2,062 linear feet of 18 inch line for a construction cost of$529,088 and a land cost of$87,133. The design cost for the combined phases was $148,023. The total actual cost was $1 ,091 ,886 which was less than the original report estimated at $1,596,137. Fees collected over the last 6 months are $37,562.70 for total amount of$137,582.44 (per Acct #253-0000-287.51-13). The remaining amount eligible for collection is about $660,438. The total amount to be recovered through impact fees is anticipated at 72% of original construction cost. A previous report showed changes in the projected densities in several of the Impact Fee areas related to the Land Uses adopted with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan in 2009. As presented in the Table below, the densities expected with the Land Use Plan adopted in 2009 are significantly different in several of the Impact Fee Areas. An update to incorporate these changes had been in progress but needed to consider the Water and Wastewater Master Plans that were under development, as well as, a City Wide Impact Fee Study that was underway. With the completion of both projects, the update is now proceeding and will be presented in the coming months. Effective Current Anticipated Remaining Impact Fee Area Buildout Impact Buildout LUE Capital LUE Fee Rate LUE Adjustment Investment to Recoup 92-01 Graham 1551 $ 316.07 1775 + 224 $ 14,000 97-01 Spring Creek 4425 $ 98.39 8384 + 3959 $172,000 97-02B Alum 3232 $ 59.42 2139 - 1093 $181,000 99-01 Harley 450 $ 769.91 440 - 10 $246,000 03-02 Steeplechase 2838 $ 357.74 7816 + 4987 $660,000 Total $1,273,000 Attachments: Impact Fee Service Areas Map Land Use at Adoption Map per Impact Fee Area Current Land Use Map per Impact Fee Area r L L LL CL E r Y r k Q Q iD crc CD C T Impact Fee 92-01 Graham Effective Land Use Legend - civic Floodplain and Streams Industrial R and D Institutional - Office Park Planned Development Redevelopment - Residential Attached Retail Neighborhood 9 - Retail Regional Rural S.F Residential High Density S.F.Residential Low Density S.F Residential Medium Density Texas A&M Univeristy ®Transitional Impact Fee 92-01 Graham Legend Current Land Use Land Use Plan FLU-2 111 -Neighborhood Conservation 910- -Rural 130-EstEst ate 109-Restricted Suburban 110-General Suburban _ 120-250-Urban - 275-Urban Mixed Use _ 210-General Commercial 200-Suburban Commercial 310-Business Park _410-Institutional/Public -450-Texas A&M University _ 710-720-Natural Areas-Protected 800-NaturaIAreas-Reserved - 850-Utilities 456-Redevelopment Areas 999-Water Impact Fee 97-01 Spring Creek Effective Land Use Legend - civic - Floodplain and Streams Industrial R and D Institutional s - � Office Park - Planned Development - Redevelopment Residential Attached Retail Neighborhood - Retail Regional Rural S.F Residential High Density S.F,Residential LowDensity S.F Residential Medium Density Texas A&M Univeristy ®Transitional Impact Fee 97-01 Spring Creek Legend Current Land Use an Ilse Plan FLU-2 1i 111 -Neighborhood Conservation 910-100-Rural 130-Estate 109-Restricted Suburban 110-General Suburban _ 120-250-Urban - 275-Urban Mixed Use _ 210-General Commercial 200-Suburban Commercial 310-Business Park _410-Institutional/Public 450-Texas A&M University _ 710-720-Natural Areas-Protected 800-NaturaIAreas-Reserved - 850-Utilities 456-Redevelopment Areas 999-Water Impact Fee 97-026 Alum Creek Effective Land Use Legend - civic - Floodplain and Streams - Industrial R and D Institutional - Office Park - Planned Development - Redevelopment - Residential Attached Retail Neighborhood - Retail Regional Rural - S.F Residential High Density S.F.Residential Low Density S.F Residential Medium Density Texas A&M Univeristy ®Transitional Impact Fee 97-026 Alum Creek Legend Current Land Use Land Use Plan FLU-2 111 -Neighborhood Conservation 910-100-Rural 130-Estate 109-Restricted Suburban 110-General Suburban Q _ 120-250-Urban 275-Urban Mixed Use _ 210-General Commercial 200-Suburban Commercial _ 310-Business Park _410-Institutional/Public -450-Texas A&M University _ 710-720-Natural Areas-Protected 800-NaturaIAreas-Reserved - 850-Utilities 456-Redevelopment Areas 999-Water Impact Fee 99-01 Harley Effective Land Use Legend o d - civic e - Floodplain and Streams - Industrial R and D Institutional Office Park - Planned Development - Redevelopment { Residential Attached Retail Neighborhood - Retail Regional Rural - S.F Residential High Density o S.F.Residential Low Density S.F Residential Medium Density Texas A&M Univeristy ®Transitional Impact Fee 99-01 Harley Current Land Use Legend Land Use Plan o e FLU-2 e 111 -Neighborhood Conservation 910-100-Rural 1 30-Estate 109-Restricted Suburban 110-General Suburban _ 120-250-Urban - 275-Urban Mixed Use _ 210-General Commercial 200-Suburban Commercial _ 310-Business Park _410-Institutional/Public -450-Texas A&M University _ 710-720-Natural Areas-Protected 800-NaturaIAreas-Reserved - 850-Utilities 456-Redevelopment Areas 999-Water Impact Fee 03-02 Steeplechase Effective Land Use Legend civic Floodplain and Streams ® - Industrial R and D Institutional - Office Park - Planned Development - Redevelopment Residential Attached Retail Neighborhood - Retail Regional Rural D - S.F Residential High Density S.F.Residential Low Density S.F Residential Medium Density Texas A&M Univeristy ®Transitional Impact Fee 03-02 Steeplechase Legend Current Land Use Land Use Plan FLU-2 111 -Neighborhood Conservation 910-100-Rural 130-Estate 109-Restricted Suburban 110-General Suburban _ 1 20-250-Urban - 275-Urban Mixed Use d _ 210-General Commercial 200-Suburban Commercial _ 310-Business Park _410-Institutional/Public O -450-Texas A&M University _ 710-720-Natural Areas-Protected 800-NaturaIAreas-Reserved - 850-Utilities 456-Redevelopment Areas 999-Water Effective Land Use Current Land Use Density Legend LUE/Acre Legend Density Land Use Plan ■Civic LUE/Acre 1.00 Floodplain and Streams FLU-2 1.62 (1.87) Industrial R and D 0.00 - 111 -Neighborhood Conservation 2.10(2.33) Institutional 1.00 910- 100- Rural 2.87 (3.01) Office 0.20 130-Estate 1.00 Park 6.59 109-Restricted Suburban ■Planned Development 4.19(8.0) 110- General Suburban Redevelopment 4.52(20) - 120-250- Urban 13.6 ResidentialAttached 275-Urban Mixed Use 3.77 (4.55) Retail Neighborhood 4.07 (5.5) - 210-General Commercial 4.07 (5.55) Retail Regional 3.77 (4.55) 200-Suburban Commercial 0.00 Rural 1.62(2.0) 310-Business Park 13.00 S.F.Residential High Density 2.00 410-Institutional/Public 0.4 S.F.Residential Low Density 450-Texas A&M University 4.5 S.F.Residential Medium Density 0.00 710-720- Natural Areas-Protected Texas A&M U nivert 0.20 800-N atura I Areas-Re served 0.00 ®Transitional dd 850-Utilities 456-Redevelopment Areas 999-Water *(#) indicates LUE for Water Impact Fee Area and only applies to the 99-01 Harley Impact Fee Area. (*01F� MINUTES CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Home of7"e=A&M University' Workshop Meeting August 15, 2013, 6:00 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Mike Ashfield, Jodi Warner, Bo Miles, Jerome Rektorik, and Jim Ross COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Vergel Gay & Brad Corrier CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: None CITY STAFF PRESENT: Bob Cowell, Lance Simms, Jennifer Prochazka, Jason Schubert, Matt Robinson, Morgan Hester, Teresa Rogers, Jenifer Paz, Kelli Schlicher, Alan Gibbs, Carol Cotter, Danielle Singh, Erika Bridges, Venessa Garza, Joe Guerra, Adam Falco, Jordan Wood, and Brittany Caldwell 1. Call the meeting to order. Chairman Ashfield called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. Chairman Ashfield stated that Regular Agenda Item 8 had been pulled from the agenda at the applicant's request. There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding Regular Agenda Item 6. 3. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. [New Development List] There was no discussion regarding new development applications. 4. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the status of items within the 2013 P&Z Plan of Work(see attached). (J. Schubert) Principal Planner Schubert gave an update regarding the 2013 P&Z Plan of Work. 5. Presentation,possible action, and discussion regarding the implementation of the Medical District Master Plan and related zoning codes. (B. Cowell) Executive Director Cowell gave a presentation regarding the Medical District Master Plan and related zoning codes. There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding the presentation. August 15,2013 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 3 6. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update of development in the Northgate area. (L. Simms) Assistant Director Simms gave an update regarding development in the Northgate area. There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding the update. 7. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an update on the following item: • An ordinance amending the Unified Development Ordinance to allow micro-industrial uses as a permitted use within the NG-1 (Core Northgate) and NG-2 (Transitional Northgate) zoning districts. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on July 18th and voted 5-0 to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on July 25th and voted 5-0 to approve the amendment. There was no discussion regarding the update. 8. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings. • Thursday, August 22, 2013 — City Council Meeting — Council Chambers —Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. (Liaison—Corrier) • Thursday, September 5, 2013 — P&Z Meeting — Council Chambers — Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. Chairman Ashfield reviewed the upcoming meeting dates with the Planning and Zoning Commission. 9. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, Joint Parks / Planning & Zoning Subcommittee, South Knoll Area Neighborhood Plan Resource Team, BioCorridor Board, and Zoning District Subcommittee. There was no discussion regarding the above-referenced meetings. 10. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. Commissioner Ross asked for a future agenda item regarding game day housing. August 15,2013 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3 11. Adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 6:50 p.m. Approved: Attest: Mike Ashfield, Chairman Brittany Caldwell,Admin. Support Specialist Planning&Zoning Commission Planning& Development Services August 15,2013 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3 (*0Fq" CITY OF COLLEGE STATION MINUTES Home of Texas A&M University* PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting August 15, 201317:00 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Mike Ashfield, Jodi Warner, Bo Miles, Brad Corrier, Jerome Rektorik, and Jim Ross COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Vergel Gay & Brad Corrier CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nancy Berry, Julie Schultz, John Nichols CITY STAFF PRESENT: Bob Cowell, Lance Simms, Jennifer Prochazka, Jason Schubert, Matt Robinson, Morgan Hester, Teresa Rogers, Jenifer Paz, Kelli Schlicher, Alan Gibbs, Carol Cotter, Danielle Singh, Erika Bridges, Venessa Garza, Joe Guerra, Adam Falco, Jordan Wood, and Brittany Caldwell 1. Call Meeting to Order Chairman Ashfield called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Hear Citizens No one spoke. 4. Consent Agenda All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. 4.1 Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve Meeting Minutes. • July 18, 2013 —Workshop • July 18, 2013 —Regular • August 1, 2013 —Workshop • August 1, 2013 —Regular 4.2 Consideration, discussion, and possible action on Absence Requests from meetings. • Brad Corrier—August 15, 2013 August 15,2013 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 5 4.3 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Great Oaks Phase 14 consisting of 16 residential lots on approximately 22.1 acres generally located east of Arboleda Drive in the Great Oaks Subdivision. Case #13-00900130 (M.Hester) 4.4 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Development Plat for Arrington Tower Site Subdivision consisting of one lot on approximately 1.507 acres generally located at the intersection of South Oaks Drive and Arrington Road in South College Station. Case#13-00900133 (T.Rogers) 4.5 Presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Tower Point Phase 8B Lots 16 &17, Block 3 consisting of two lots on approximately 2.8 acres, generally located at 913 William D. Fitch Parkway. Case#13-009000135 (J.Paz) Commissioner Miles motioned to approve Consent Agenda Items 4.1 — 4.5. Commissioner Ross seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). Regular Agenda 5. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. No items were removed from the Consent Agenda. 6. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending the College Station Comprehensive Plan by adopting the South Knoll Area Neighborhood Plan for the area generally located within the boundaries of Texas Avenue South, Holleman Drive, Welsh Avenue, Southwest Parkway,Wellborn Road, and Harvey Mitchell Parkway. Case #13-00900151 (J.Prochazka) (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the August 22,2013 City Council Meeting-subject to change) Principal Planner Prochazka presented the proposed South Knoll Area Neighborhood Plan. There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding the Plan. Chairman Ashfield opened the public hearing. Mike Gyllenband, Hardwood, Texas; Charles Burn, 1508 Caudill Street, College Station, Texas; Donald Deere, 1500 Frost Drive, College Station, Texas; Robert McGeachin, 1208 Glade Street, College Station, Texas; M.M. Kothmann, 1216 South Ridgefield Circle, College Station, Texas; Dudley Smith, 1810 Shadowwood Drive, College Station, Texas; Phil Banks, 1206 Winding Road, College Station, Texas; Hugh Lindsay, 400 Walton Drive, College Station, Texas; Rodney Boehn, 1911 Langford Street, College Station, Texas; Garry Adams, 1803 Lawyer Place, College Station, Texas; Kendra Perkins, 1717 B Lawyer Street, College Station, Texas; Clayton Powell, 1211 South Ridgefield Circle, College Station, Texas; Christopher Mathewson, 1307 Glade Street, College Station, Texas; Jerry Cooper, 602 Bell Street, College Station, Texas; Amanda August 15,2013 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 5 Hathaway 1901 West Holleman Drive, College Station, Texas; Kathe Hawkins, 1805 Lawyer Street, College Station, Texas; Lorence Bravenec, 1101 Goode Drive, College Station, Texas; Melissa Lesikar, 1716 Ramona Circle, San Marcos, Texas; Sherron McKenzie, 1801 Bee Creek Drive, College Station, Texas; Mike Painter, 1209 Lancelot Circle, College Station, Texas; Whitney Wolf, Steve Strong; Arthur Wright, 1008 Holt Street, College Station, Texas. The citizens spoke regarding the Plan and some expressed concerns regarding rental properties in the area and the proposed parking requirements. Chairman Ashfield closed the public hearing. There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding the Plan Commissioner Warner motioned to recommend approval of the Plan with an amendment that allows for the option for the residents to petition for the parking removal from 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m., in lieu of it applying neighborhood wide; her motion also included that residents be able to petition to allow for parking removal on one side of streets in the area (this is not an amendment to the proposed Plan). Commissioner Ross seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). 7. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a request to utilize the sidewalk fund and presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Development Plat for Salem Baptist Church consisting of one lot on approximately 0.89 acres generally located west of the Creek Meadows Subdivision and more specifically along Royder Road. Case #13- 00900129 (M.Robinson) Senior Planner Robinson presented the applicant's request to utilize the sidewalk fund and the Development Plat and recommended approval. Chris Galindo, 3107 Rolling Lane, Bryan, Texas, stated that the church had owned the property for many years and the church that was at the location was destroyed by a fire about nine years ago. He said that the Development Plat is one of the steps that has to be taken for the church to be rebuilt. Commissioner Warner motioned to approve the applicant's request to utilize the sidewalk fund. Commissioner Miles seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). Commissioner Warner motioned to approve the Development Plat. Commissioner Miles seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). 8. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan — Future Land Use & Character Map from Neighborhood Conservation to Urban for the property located at 900 & 900A Ashburn Avenue approximately 1.6 acres at the corner of Ashburn Avenue and Lincoln Avenue. Case #13-00900140 (M.Hester) (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the September 12,2013 City Council Meeting -subject to change) August 15,2013 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 5 This item was removed from the agenda at the applicant's request. 9. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Articles 3, "Development Review Procedures," 7, "General Development Standards," and 8, "Subdivision Design and Improvements," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by the creation and amendment of single-family parking requirements. Case #13-00900128 (T. Rogers) (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the September 12, 2013 City Council Meeting -subject to change) Staff Planner Rogers presented the amendment regarding the creation and amendment of single-family parking requirements. There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding the amendment. Chairman Ashfield opened the public hearing. Buck Prewitt, 2302 Scotney Court, College Station, Texas, said that cost should be considered as a factor. Chairman Ashfield closed the public hearing. Commissioner Rektorik motioned to recommend approval of the amendment with the condition that townhomes be exempt from the front area coverage requirement on single-family lots. 10. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Sections 12-8.3.E, "Streets," and 12-8.3.G, "Blocks," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas to amend street network and block length requirements. Case #13-00900141 (J.Schubert) (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the August 22, 2013 City Council Meeting -subject to change) Chairman Ashfield opened the public hearing. No one spoke during the public hearing. Chairman Ashfield closed the public hearing. Commissioner Warner motioned to table the item to the September 5th Planning & Zoning Meeting. Commissioner Rektorik seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). 11. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by the creation and amendment of one- and two-family residential zoning districts in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Case #13- August 15,2013 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 5 00900030 (J.Prochazka) (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the September 12,2013 City Council Meeting -subject to change) Chairman Ashfield opened the public hearing. No one spoke during the public hearing. Chairman Ashfield closed the public hearing. Commissioner Warner motioned to table the item to the September 5th Planning & Zoning Meeting. Commissioner Miles seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). 12. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending the College Station Comprehensive Plan by adopting the Economic Development Master Plan. Case #13-00900143 (B.Cowell) (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the August 22,2013 City Council Meeting -subject to change) Chairman Ashfield opened the public hearing. No one spoke during the public hearing. Chairman Ashfield closed the public hearing. Commissioner Warner motioned to table the item to the September 5th Planning & Zoning Meeting. Commissioner Miles seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). 13. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. Commissioner Rektorik asked for a future agenda item regarding traffic calming measures. 14. Adj ourn. The meeting was adjourned at 10:44 p.m. Approved: Attest: Mike Ashfield, Chairman Brittany Caldwell,Admin. Support Specialist Planning&Zoning Commission Planning& Development Services August 15,2013 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 5 (*01"" CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning ear Development Services Absence Request Form For Elected and Appointed Officers Name Vergel Gay Request Submitted on 8/15/2013 I will not be in attendance at the meeting on 8/15/2013 for the reason specified: (Date) Not able to attend. Signature Vergel Gay (*01"" CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning ear Development Services Absence Request Form For Elected and Appointed Officers Name Jim Ross Request Submitted on 8/29/2013 I will not be in attendance at the meeting on 9/5/2013 for the reason specified: (Date) Out of town trip. Signature Jim Ross (i *Ar� CITY OF COLLEGE STATION FINAL PLAT for Great Oaks Ph 1 B 13-00900147 SCALE: Two lots on approximately 3.03 acres LOCATION: Generally located north of Great Oaks Drive in the Great Oaks Subdivision. ZONING: A-OR Rural Residential Subdivision APPLICANT: Clint Cooper, BCS Rock Prairie PROJECT MANAGER: Morgan Hester, Staff Planner mhester@cstx.gov RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat. Planning &Zoning Commission Page 1 of 3 September 5, 2013 d*411 ' IN, . 1 I' 'r IF vo Al 717 Y �' ,�'�'�' `.� �`.'W ' •� e w,,,8�'darn, �' < T .. 4 F wt m 0— U) Q e Q ui C7 �' J D 4� Y W W Of H z W ILIL O J W W R ii A Planning &Zoning Commission Page 2 of 3 September 5, 2013 DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: March 2008 Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open upon annexation A-OR Rural Residential Subdivision in May 2008 Preliminary Plat: Preliminary Plats have been approved for Great Oaks in 2006, 2012, and a recent revision in July 2013. Site Development: Vacant. Two residential lots are proposed with this phase, ranging in size from 1.3 acres to 1.65 acres. COMMENTS Parkland Dedication: This development was Master Planned in the ETJ prior to parkland dedication requirements; therefore, no parkland dedication is required. Greenways: N/A Pedestrian Connectivity: At the time when Great Oaks was master planned, the tract was located in the ETJ; therefore, no sidewalks are proposed or required. Bicycle Connectivity: At the time when Great Oaks was master planned, the tract was located in the ETJ; therefore, no bicycle facilities are proposed or required. Impact Fees: N/A REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Restricted Suburban and the proposed lot sizes exceed what is recommended with this land use. The proposed lots will have access from Great Oaks Drive, a future 2-lane Minor Collector on the Thoroughfare Plan. 2. Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The Final Plat complies with the applicable Subdivision Regulations contained in the Unified Development Ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Application 2. Copy of Final Plat Planning &Zoning Commission Page 3 of 3 September 5, 2013 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO: DATE SUBMITTEDa_C a C ITY 01:(:OLLliGTIME: E STATION Home of 7e=A6YW Univmiy' STAFF �- FINAL PLAT APPLICATION (Check one) ❑ Minor ❑ Amending ® Final ❑ Vacating ❑Replat ($700) ($700) ($932) ($932) ($932) Is this plat in the ETJ? ❑ Yes ❑ No Is this plat Commercial 0 or Residential MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: $700-$932 Final Plat Application Fee(see above). A)&[:] $233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable). n [] $600 (minimum) Development Permit Application / Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is 1% of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is >$600, the balance is due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit). Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided. ® Fourteen (14)folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.) Two(2)copies of the grading, drainage, and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report. AK❑ Two (2)copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable). (,Ip-E] Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable). Q Title report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate current within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership, liens, encumbrances, etc. Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. ® The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. NOTE: A mylar of the approved preliminary plan must be on file before a final plat application will be considered complete. If the mylar is submitted with the final plat application, it shall be considered a submittal for the preliminary plan project and processed and reviewed as such. Until the mylar has been confirmed by staff to be correct, the final plat application will be considered incomplete. Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference NAME OF PROJECT w _1 N!,c ADDRESS SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT: C kA;kCA ` G P 61'Wff � aC E1ei ops APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name 12C- Ilc RAR e f w( !ter E-mail U10�t�l�Co�[e tl Street Address k700 ftAlto City .` State Zip Code 7�8� Phone Number C 7" Fax Number — 1111 Page 1 of 9 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (All owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple owners): Name �/}Mc As 4PP1'C'4'1-t- E-mail Street Address City State _ Zip Code Phone Number Fax Number ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S iNFORMATI Name L(jur(f df lsc6'4r>) E-mail Are- Street Address 160S Wor4CCrc% City CS State Zip Code 7791-5 Phone Number 1,13- 3$3s Fax Number Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property? ❑ Yes © No Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property?If so, please provide the volume and Page No. Total Acreage _2, A k Total No. of Lots Z- R-O-W Acreage 07$ Existing Use ,n Proposed Use Number of Lots By Zoning District Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: Floodplain Acreage Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels)on the property? F Yes No This Information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made, vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law. Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s)and you are requesting the application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable? F es f— No If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide additional sheets if necessary): Project Name: City Project Number(if known): Date/Timeframe when submitted: 1/11 Page 2 of 9 A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan (if applicable); Requested waiver to subdivision regulations and reason for same if a licable ; Regarding the waiver request, explain how: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision re ulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. 2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. 3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. 4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable): 1. r An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way; 2. The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan; 3. f A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve(12)months; 4. r— Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate/ rural context; 5. F_ When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan; 1/11 Page 3 of 9 6, r The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO;or 7. F The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway/Expressway as designated by Map 6.6, Thoroughfare Plan-Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Detailed explanation of condition identified above: NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the same time by the Planning &Zoning Commission. Requested Oversize Participation Total Linear Footage of Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: Proposed Public: Streets ACREAGE: ". Sidewalks No. of acres to be dedicated +$ development fee Sanitary Sewer Lines No. of acres in floodplain No. of acres in detention Water Lines Channels No. of acres in greenways OR Storm Sewers FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: Bike Lanes/Paths No. of SF Dwelling Units X$ _ $ (date)Approved by Parks &Recreation Advisory Board NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. LIEN HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as described above. Sign t re and title Date 1/11 Page 4 of 9 CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT Owner Certification: 1. No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued. 2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein. 3. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re-issued. 4. Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. 5. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance. 6. Other permits may be required to fulfill local, state, and federal requirements. Owner will obtain or show compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOI and SWPPP. 7. If required, Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre- pour)and post construction. 8. Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify compliance. 9. If, stormwater mitigation is required, including detention ponds proposed as part of this project, it shall be designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project. 10. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that all debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities.All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project.All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall apply. 11. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines Technical Specifications, and Standard Details.All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. 12. Release of plans to (name or firm)is authorized for bidding purposes only. I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on contractor signature on approved Development Permit. 13. I, THE OWNER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION,ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE,AND ACCURATE. • '�� Prop y Owner(s) Date Engineer Certification: 1. The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds, proposed as part of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence. 2. 1 will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local, State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOI and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES: i.e., projects over 10 acres may require a sedimentation basin. 3. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station,Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines.All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. 4. I,THE ENGINEER,AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN,AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION,ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE,AND *ngin _ 10-13 Date 1111 Page b of 9 The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas. Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, Fill /Grading Permits, and Clearing Only Permits:* A. I, certify, as demonstrated in the attached drainage study, that the alterations or development covered by this permit, shall not: (i) increase the Base Flood elevation; (ii) create additional areas of Special Flood Hazard Area; (iii) decrease the conveyance capacity to that part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway and where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood event is greater than one foot per second. This area can also be approximated to be either areas within 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or areas where the depth of from the BFE to natural ground is 18 inches or greater; (iv) reduce the Base Flood water storage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond the floodway and conveyance area where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than one foot per second without acceptable compensation as set forth in the City of College Station Code of Ordinances, Chapter 13 concerning encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area; nor (v) increase Base Flood velocities. beyond those areas exempted by ordinance in Section 5.11.3a of Chapter 13 Code of Ordinances. Engineer Date Initial 1' If a platting-status exemption to this requirement is asserted, provide written justification under separate JJ letter in lieu of certification, Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, and Fill / Grading Permits: B. I, , certify to the following: (i) that any nonresidential or multi-family structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is designed to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100-year storm. Engineer Date Additional certification for Floodway Encroachments: C. I, , certify that the construction, improvement, or fill covered by this permit shall not increase the base flood elevation. I will apply for a variance to the Zoning Board of Adjustments. Engineer Date 1111 Page 6 of 9 Required for all projects proposing structures In Special Flood Hazard Area (Elevation Certificate required). Residential Structures: D. I, , certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor, including all utilities, ductwork and any basement, at an elevation at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation. Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-pour)and post construction. Engineer/ Surveyor Date Commercial Structures: E. I, certify that all new construction or any substantial improvement of any commercial, industrial, or other non-residential structure are designed to have the lowest floor, including all utilities, ductwork and basements, elevated at least one foot above the Base Flood Elevation Engineer I Surveyor Date OR certify that the structure with its attendant utility, ductwork, basement and sanitary facilities is designed to be flood-proofed so that the structure and utilities, ductwork, basement and sanitary facilities are designed to be watertight and impermeable to the intrusion of water in all areas below the Base Flood Elevation, and shall resist the structural loads and buoyancy effects from the hydrostatic and hydrodynamic conditions. Required Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre- pour)and post construction. Engineer/ Surveyor Date Conditions or comments as part of approval: 1111 Page 7 of 9 FINAL PLAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: (Requirements based on field survey and marked by monuments and markers.) Drawn on 24"x 36"sheet to scale of 100'per inch. ® Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in relationship to College Station and its City Limits. No scale required but include north arrow. [ Title Block with the following information: ® Name and address of subdivider, recorded owner, planner, engineer and surveyor. [ Proposed name of subdivision. (Subdivision name &street names will be approved through Brazos County 911.) Date of preparation. © Engineer's scale in feet. n Total area intended to be developed. ® North Arrow. Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines. A(&W If more than 1 sheet, an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or larger. All applicable certifications based on the type of final plat. Ownership and Dedication Surveyor and/or Engineer © City Engineer(and City Planner, if a minor plat) ® Planning and Zoning Commission (delete if minor plat) 0 Brazos County Clerk ❑ Brazos County Commissioners Court Approval (ETJ Plats only) ��p❑ If submitting a replat where there are existing improvements, submit a survey of the subject property showing the improvements to ensure that no encroachments will be created. [� If using private septic systems, add a general note on the plat that no private sewage facility may be installed on any lot in this subdivision without the issuance of a license by the Brazos County Health Unit under the provisions of the private facility regulations adopted by the Commissioner's Court of Brazos County, pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.084 of the Texas Water Code. r\�a.❑ Location of the 100-Year Floodplain and floodway, if applicable, according to the most recent available data. �J Lot corner markers and survey monuments (by symbol)and clearly tied to basic survey data. Matches the approved preliminary plan or qualifies as minor amendments (UDO Section 3.3.E.2). The location and description with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii, area, center angle, degree of curvature, tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the following: (Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a boundary with the subdivision, as well as, those within the subdivision). Existing Proposed ❑ KID— ❑ Streets. Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac, stubbed out streets must end into a temp turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet. Public and private R.O.W. locations and widths. (All existing and proposed R.O.W.'s sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan.) © Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance. 1111 Page 8 of 9 Existing Proposed ❑ ❑ Alleys. © -E] Easements. ® ® A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block (numbered sequentially). ❑ ❑ Parkland dedication/greenbelt area/park linkages. All proposed dedications must be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and documentation of their recommendation provided prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration. ^(�❑ Construction documents for all public infrastructure drawn on 24"x 36"sheets and properly sealed by a Licensed Texas Professional Engineer that include the following: ❑ Street, alley and sidewalk plans, profiles and sections. One sheet must show the overall street, alley and/or sidewalk layout of the subdivision. (may be combined with other utilities). ❑ Sewer Design Report. ❑ Sanitary sewer plan and profile showing depth and grades. One sheet must show the overall sewer layout of the subdivision. (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas.) ❑ Water Design Report and/or Fire Flow Report. ❑ Water line plan showing fire hydrants, valves, etc. with plan and profile lines showing depth and grades. One sheet must show the overall water layout of the subdivision. (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas.) ❑ Storm drainage system plan with contours, street profile, inlets, storm sewer and drainage channels, with profiles and sections. Drainage and runoff areas, and runoff based on 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 year rain intensity. Detailed drainage structure design, channel lining design & detention if used. One sheet must show the overall drainage layout of the subdivision. ❑ Detailed cost estimates for all public infrastructure listed above sealed by Texas P.E. ❑ Letter of completion for public infrastructure or guarantee/surety in accordance with UDO Section 8.6. ❑ Drainage Report with a Technical Design Summary. ❑ Erosion Control Plan (must be included in construction plans). ,r���❑ All off-site easements necessary for infrastructure construction must be shown on the final plat with a volume and page listed to indicate where the separate instrument easements were filed. Separate instrument easements must be provided in recordable form to the City prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration. Are there impact fees associated with this development? ❑ Yes No Impact fees must be paid prior to building permit. Will any construction occur in TxDOT rights-of-way? ❑ Yes f7l No If yes, TxDOT permit must be submitted along with the construction documents. NOTE: 1. We will be requesting the corrected Final Plat to be submitted in digital form if available prior to filing the plat at the Courthouse. 2, If the construction area is greater than 5 acres, EPA Notice of Intent(NOI) must be submitted prior to issuance of a development permit. 1/11 Page 9 or 9 Y" Y1 af gqy 6; Q V1 RIS A 1H MIT in 110 Novi" H91 -- 1 - 0- him Nis 2 7;M h 98 77 14 paN ........... ITS O;H!tnm ;g ;Wos da_a, MWf T.ME; ,. ; HL— A g!10 JJ i-F,! MIMMURNK MIN 11011111 1,A -W NPR �31; jaw gj NO ----- Safi$ to t' �i �q� �pa� v� I $$ 'bo � € ij� HER i q, Mi CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PRELIMINARY PLAN for Shenandoah Ph 15 13-00900155 SCALE: 86 lots on 28.41 acres LOCATION: 4160 Alexandria Ave, generally located between Shenandoah Phases 14 and 8B ZONING: R-1 Single-Family Residential APPLICANT: Edward Froehling PROJECT MANAGER: Teresa Rogers, Staff Planner trogers@cstx.gov PROJECT OVERVIEW: This property was included in the Shenandoah Master Development Plan. Phases 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 were final platted in January 2009, October 2007, June 2004, July 2004, and January 2005, respectively. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan. Planning &Zoning Commission Page 1 of 4 September 5, 2013 z d s' B J LLI �y�b ?oaf w air a z LO d Q4 ui r o t.� a1 a x U- o a LLI 60 ocr J bey ly i W z 7 W 0 O �, bh > 5ui ry ��7ve qQ- a'pb ❑ gip,', 1 nsS Planning &Zoning Commission Page 2 of 4 September 5, 2013 DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: June 21, 1995 Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open (upon annexation) R-1 Single-Family Residential (1998) R-1 Single-Family Residential (2004) Site development: Vacant COMMENTS Water: The subject property will be served by City of College Station. There are existing 6 inch and 8 inch water mains adjacent to the site. Public waterlines will be required to be extended through the site in accordance with the B/CS Unified Design Guidelines with platting. Sewer: The subject property will be served by City of College Station. There is an existing 8 inch sanitary sewer line adjacent to the site which will provide service to the site. Public sanitary sewer lines will be required to be extended through the site in accordance with the B/CS Unified Design Guidelines with platting. Off-site Easements: No off-site easements are proposed at this time. Drainage: The subject property is located within the Spring Creek Drainage Basin. Drainage required with site development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the B/CS Unified Design Guidelines. Detention has been provided for this property with previous phases. Flood Plain: A portion of this site is located with FEMA floodplain per panel number 48041 C0325E. Greenways: No greenway dedication is required or proposed. Pedestrian Connectivity: A multi-use path is proposed and will be constructed by the City in the future to run from the City of College Station property south of this subdivision through the west side of the site (through the common area) to the Seaback tract to the west. The multi-use path will be located within a 20-foot public access easement provided with this project, the location of which will be determined at final platting. Sidewalks will also be constructed along both sides of all proposed streets. Bicycle Connectivity: See comment for pedestrian connectivity. Streets: Phases 15 will have access within the Shenandoah Subdivision from Alexandria Drive, a minor collector on the Thoroughfare Plan. Oversize Request: None requested. Planning &Zoning Commission Page 3 of 4 September 5, 2013 Parkland Dedication Fees: The Parks and Recreation Board accepted parkland dedication with the Master Development Plan. Parkland Development of $30,788 (86 x $358) fees will be required prior to the filing of the final plat. Impact Fees: The subject property is located within the Spring Creek Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Area: $98.39/LUE. REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance: The subject property is designated General Suburban and Natural Areas-Reserved on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map. The proposed subdivision is consistent with this designation in addition to the land use designations surrounding the subject tract which include General Suburban and Natural Areas-Reserved. In addition, the applicant is proposing an access easement for a future multi-use path consistent with the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan. 2. Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The proposed Preliminary Plan is in compliance with the Subdivision Regulations contained in the Unified Development Ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Application 2. Copy of Preliminary Plan Planning &Zoning Commission Page 4 of 4 September 5, 2013 FOR OFFIU USE ON CASE NO.: ' DATE SUBMITTE C:1TY O1r Coi.i iE STATIO\ TIME: Holm of Taxan A&YVl 11111 vershy" STAFF: PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: 932 Preliminary Plan Application Fee. 233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable). Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used nd may not be adjusted or altered, Please attach pages if additional information is provided. �ourteen(14)folded copies of plan.A revised mylar original must be submitted after approval. Title report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate current within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership, liens, encumbrances, etc. ql Jfnpact study(if oversized participation is requested). The attached Preliminary Plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. Date of Optional Preapplicatiyo--n Conference NAME OF PROJECT ✓V! n �� ADDRESS SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION: APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name GUAroi A114-V .�I E-mail Street Address 6W)) 4r h LO►'1 CSD w+C. City GS State _ Tx Zip Code -77g-T,5 Phone Number —_-`_��te •_ 1z" Fax Number 71 - 77-4- 0"157 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (ALL owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple owners); Name SA*W- 4W �1rea+�� E-mail Street Address City State __ _ __ Zip Code _ Phone Number Fax Number ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: ''AAnn f 1 Name W C.•lyPt t 17JewAC C3c �tAz.'rr� _ E-mail +►� �r�lYLroeWA-.(yN• Street AddressL j00 [O�po�[ S +I� r1 City State �x Zip Code 77- /S Phone Number A19 -LI3.3-J 31 Fax Number 11111 Page 1 of 6 Total Acreage _Z �TTotal No. of Lots R-O-W Acreage 7• Number of Lots By Zoning District ?)U417 Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: Floodplain Acreage �•7J� NOTE: Appropriate zoning for the proposed subdivision must be in place before this application can be considered complete. Are you proposing to dedicate park land by acreage or fee in lieu of land? Are you proposing to F develop the park r dedicate the development fee?(Check one) This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made, vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law. Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s)and you are requesting the application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable? D(Yes F No If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications(provide additional sheets if necessary): Project Name: 6�COWA4'tk City Project Number(in known): Date/Timeframe when submitted: Requested wavier to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable): 1/19 Page 2 of 6 Regarding the waiver request, explain how: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. 2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. 3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other f property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. q, The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. L - - Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition(if applicable): 1. r- An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way; 2. r The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan; 3. r A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12) months; 4. F_ Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate/ rural context; 5. r When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan; 1111 Page 3 of 6 6. F The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO; or 7. [7'The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway/Expressway as designated by Map 6.6, Thoroughfare Plan-f=unctional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Detailed explanation of condition identified above: NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the same time by the Planning &Zoning Commission. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. LIEN HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as described above. Signwture andlitle Date ��� Page 4 of 6 ti E, 0�IiO !..R Hip iN -IdI , . —7 Lj c ko 411 tz le :74 117 II H4, al 51 I r 4�i F—1 I v _j 7- Ri JR ------ ------- CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PRELIMINARY PLAN for Pebble Creek Ph 7C & 71) 13-00900103 SCALE: 134 lots on 84.4 acres LOCATION: 1320 Royal Adelade Loop, generally located east of Pebble Creek Parkway and south of Pebble Creek Phases 7A & 7B ZONING: R-1 Single-Family Residential APPLICANT: Davis Young, Pebble Creek Development PROJECT MANAGER: Teresa Rogers, Staff Planner trogers@cstx.gov PROJECT OVERVIEW: This request is for a Preliminary Plan of 134 lots on 84.4 acres. A Master Preliminary Plan was approved for Pebble Creek Development in August 1996 and the Preliminary Plat for Phase 7 was approved in 1998. At that time, the Planning & Zoning Commission allowed the delay of construction for Pebble Creek Parkway until Phase 7C was developed. That Preliminary Plat has since expired, requiring the applicant to resubmit a Preliminary Plan application. Phases 7C & 7D include all of the land that was previously proposed as Phase 7C. A portion of Pebble Creek Parkway will be constructed with Phase 7D. Phases 7A, 7-131, and 7-132 were final platted in August 1999 and January 2003, January 2005 respectively. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan. Planning &Zoning Commission Page 1 of 4 September 5, 2013 z 4 � J W Ov l') 0 C'7 IL Ay U v N R 4 f7A g+4`pp$� •$ ly C9 R W �Caq LIJ ca _ = M ` 4 m w ui LLJ O� yp GLIA4CE R RIPP� 0 LIJ LLI Planning &Zoning Commission Page 2 of 4 September 5, 2013 DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: October 1983 and December 1994 Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open (upon annexation) R-1 Single-Family Residential (2004) Site development: vacant COMMENTS Water: The subject property will be served by City of College Station. There are existing 8 inch water mains located adjacent to the site. Public waterlines will be required to be extended through the site in accordance with the B/CS Unified Design Guidelines with platting. Sewer: The subject property will be served by City of College Station. There is an existing 16 inch sanitary sewer line adjacent to the site which will provide service to the site. Public sanitary sewer lines will be required to be extended through the site in accordance with the B/CS Unified Design Guidelines with platting. Off-site Easements: No off-site easements are being proposed at this time. Drainage: The site is located within the Alum Creek watershed. The property is bordered to the north by Alum Creek Tributary 3 and to the south by Alum Creek. Development of the subject tract will be required to meet the City's Storm Water Design Guidelines. Flood Plain: A portion of this property is located in FEMA designated floodplain per panel 48041 C0350E. Greenways: No greenway dedication is required or proposed. Pedestrian Connectivity: A 10-foot multi-use path is being proposed adjacent to Pebble Creek Parkway. The multi-use path will be located within dedicated city parkland. In addition, sidewalks will be constructed along both sides of all proposed local streets. Bicycle Connectivity: See comment for pedestrian connectivity. Streets: Phases 7C & 7D will have access to the future extension of Pebble Creek Parkway, a major collector. In addition, there will be access to Royal Adelade Drive, a local street, which will be extended from Phase 713 and connect to St. Andrews Drive. Oversize Request: A 12 inch water main will be required to be extended through the property as shown in the City's Master Utility Plan. Parkland Dedication Fees: Parkland dedication fees have already been dedicated with previous development of the Pebble Creek Subdivision. Planning &Zoning Commission Page 3 of 4 September 5, 2013 Impact Fees: N/A REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance: The subject property is designated Restricted Suburban on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map. The proposed subdivision lots average approximately 14,000 square feet, which is consistent with this designation. In addition, the applicant is proposing a multi-use path adjacent to Pebble Creek Parkway, consistent with the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan. 2. Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The proposed Preliminary Plan is in compliance with the Subdivision Regulations contained in the Unified Development Ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Application 2. Copy of Preliminary Plan Planning &Zoning Commission Page 4 of 4 September 5, 2013 FOR OFFICE 0 (*Orq" CASE NO.: ' DATE 5L1 MIT,Tf:t]: 4 yt y CITY OF('.OL.LE(GE STATIC)\ TIME: Home of Texru AaM ffmiwslty" STAFF: PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: '] $932 Preliminary Plan Application Fee. ❑ $233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable). Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided. I" Fourteen (14)folded copies of plan.A revised mylar original must be submitted after approval. Title report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate current within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership, liens, encumbrances,etc. J Impact study(if oversized participation is requested). C The attached Preliminary Plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. Date of Optional Preapplication Conference NAME OF PROJECTFe �ble ADDRESS SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION: gdJa«�-� � pry 70b61� k - APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): toeo450-reWecteek.ot' Name i1b6i° 6"ek Iku�{a�•M"f CDa��� n� E-mail � J�ycbbl[cnxk.e�g J Street Address wk, City G's . State �� Zip Code 'T'r8s Phone Number A9.0"7_ - Fax Number PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (ALL owners must be identified, Please attach an additional sheet for multiple owners): Names � a E-mail - Street Address ! City State Zip Code Phone Number Fax Number ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: n Name t;...ne �+eu t t�erN�t l 'T E-mail 'm P iVIGGUPC ir&WAeeA*1 Street Address L' aftheef City C•5 • State '1;( Zip Code1�`l Phone Number - $3$ Fax Number 1111 Page 1 of 6 Total Acreage /• /�-7 �. 2- g b Total No. of Lots ,j-�� �2i't R-O-W Acreage Number of Lots By Zoning District Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: Floodplain Acreage AG. NOTE: Appropriate zoning for the proposed subdivision must be in place before this application can be considered complete. // Are you proposing to dedicate park land by acreage or fee in lieu of land? fteviovb1 y WIC; Z°j Are you proposing to F- develop the park r dedicate the development fee?(Check one) This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made, vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law. Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s)and you are requesting the application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable? F- Yes F- No If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications(provide additional sheets if necessary): Project Name: City Project Number(in known): Date/Timeframe when submitted: Requested wavier to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable): 1111 Page 2 of 6 Regarding the waiver request, explain how: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. 2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. 3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. 4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable): 1. r An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way; 2. f The presence of unique or unusual topographic,vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the LIDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan; 3. r A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12)months; 4. F Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate/ rural context; 5. F When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan; 1111 Page 3 of 6 6. f The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the LIDO; or 7. r The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway I Expressway as designated by Map 6.6, Thoroughfare Plan-Functional Classification,in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Detailed explanation of condition identified above: NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the same time by the Planning&Zoning Commission. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. LIEN HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as described above. '1-11-30113 Signature and ti Cr Date 1/11 Page 4 of 6 126Z "15, off �❑v—� �' ��I I 1 114 a 4�Q ��.. �!rI!' �4� /� _ -I I X11 r� � h y Q _•1 ,� �' \ / I I r Qw ling •+ sus z r �'" I _ I l i — •�_W °� x — --7r a a I H s E In Ij "IA k } I _i nu S L 4 � Ind-.ar «i_�r'�a7° '� " � _ n�s+fw..�'f _ ;xwZ �, �('/4 / \/ ✓�/7 #F` �i riM,�g �"- ��� � 1 1 Iii i CITY OF COLLEGE STATION FINAL PLAT for Castlegate II Section 202, Lots 1 R-2R and Common Areas A & B, Blocks 11 & 17 Being a Replat of Castlegate II Section 202, Lots 1-2, Block 11 13-00900154 SCALE: Two lots on 3.1 acres LOCATION: 4600 & 4602 Tonbridge Drive ZONING: R-1 Single-Family Residential APPLICANT: Wallace Phillips IV, 3-D Development LLC PROJECT MANAGER: Matt Robinson, AICP, Senior Planner mrobinson@cstx.gov PROJECT OVERVIEW: This replat is to adjust property lines and plat common areas along Greens Prairie Road West. The Final Plat for Section 202 was originally approved in 2012. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat. Planning &Zoning Commission Page 1 of 3 September 5, 2013 IL W LO En \ 1 Y 't :a r •Ran \\\ .. ._ g... Q r `�F U 0 t LLI z ► Q m LLI � ���l"' 9p ��.� i; ': .„ . 'si' •� \tip' yam, ,y� ♦ _ \ .1p Y w �a gW '���; ° k:.;:�, -�'a ..xv ate ...�.�{� •+�, �p..k Planning &Zoning Commission Page 2 of 3 September 5, 2013 Annexation: 1995 Zoning: A-O (upon annexation) to A-O Agricultural Open and R-1 Single- Family Residential (2007) Preliminary Plat: Castlegate II preliminary plat was approved in January 2011 and subsequently revised in March 2012. Site Development: Sections 101 and 102 infrastructure is currently under construction, and Sections 100 and 200-202 are currently platted with homes under construction. COMMENTS Parkland Dedication: No new lots are being created and as such no additional parkland dedication is required. Greenways: N/A Pedestrian Connectivity: Sidewalks will be provided along Greens Prairie Road. Bicycle Connectivity: Bike lanes are planned along Greens Prairie Road Impact Fees: The subject tract is located in the Spring Creek Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Area and will be assessed $98.39 per Living Unit Equivalent (LUE). REVIEW CRITERIA Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The proposed replat is in compliance with the Subdivision Requirements contained in the Unified Development Ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Application 2. Copy of Final Plat Planning &Zoning Commission Page 3 of 3 September 5, 2013 FOR OFFIC SE QHLY CASE NO.: 1+�J _ DATE SUBMITTED: aP I a.. TIME: g CITY OF(.Oi jr-,.cE STATION � Home of Teras Ad-M University' STAFF: FINAL PLAT APPLICATION (Check one) ❑ Minor ❑ Amending ❑ Final ❑ Vacating ❑X Replat ($700) ($700) ($932) ($932) ($932) Is this plat in the ETJ? ❑ Yes ❑ No Is this plat Commercial ❑ or Residential ❑X MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: 11 $700-$932 Final Plat Application Fee (see above). N $233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable). $600 (minimum) Development Permit Application / Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is 1% of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is > $600, the balance is due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit). Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided. Fourteen (14)folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.) Two (2) copies of the grading, drainage, and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report. Two(2) copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable). W Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats(if applicable). Title report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate current within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership, liens, encumbrances, etc. f Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. NOTE: A mylar of the approved preliminary plan must be on file before a final plat application will be considered complete. If the mylar is submitted with the final plat application, it shall be considered a submittal for the preliminary plan project and processed and reviewed as such. Until the mylar has been confirmed by staff to be correct, the final plat application will be considered incomplete. Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference N/A NAME OF PROJECT Castlegate 11 Subdivision-Section 202 RePlat ADDRESS Intersection of W. S. Phillips Parkway and Victoria Avenue SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT: Adjacent to Greens Prairie Road APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name Wallace Phillips IV E-mail dustyphillips52@yahoo.com Street Address 4490 Castlegate Drive City College Station State TX Zip Code 77845 Phone Number 979.690.7250 Fax Number 979.690.1041 1/11 Page 1 of 9 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (All owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple owners): Name 3-D Development, LLC/New Vision Custom Homes E-mail dustyphillips52@yahoo.com,r , 1 to Street Address 4490 Castlegate Drive/4209 Rock Creek Court City College Station/College Station State TX1 TX Zip Code 77845/77845 Phone Number 979.690.72501979-703-7933 Fax Number 979.690.1041 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name Schultz Engineering, LLC-Joe Schultz E-mail loeschultz84@verizon.net Street Address 2730 Longmire Drive, Suite A City College Station State TX Zip Code 77845 Phone Number 979.764.3900 Fax Number 979.764.3910 Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property? X❑ Yes ❑ No Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so, please provide the Volume 10392 and Page No. 276 Total Acreage 3.107 Total No. of Lots 2 _ R-O-W Acreage 0.775 Existing Use Single Family Residential Proposed Use Single Family Residential Number of Lots By Zoning District 2 / R1 Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: 0.253 / RI Floodplain Acreage n/a Is there Special Flood Hazard Area(Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels)on the property? r41 Yes IT No This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made, ,vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law. Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable? rXI Yes F-,,,' No If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications(provide additional sheets if necessary): Project Name: Castlegate II Preliminary Plat - CASTLEGATE II SEC 202 (FP) City Project Number(if known): 12-00500004 - 12-00500105 Date/Timeframe when submitted: January 2012 - 05/14/12 1/11 Page 2 of 9 A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan (if applicable) Requested waiver to subdivision regulations and reason for same(if applicable): none Regarding the waiver request, explain how: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. .t 2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. 3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. 4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable): 1. � An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way; 2. F- The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan; 3. A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12) months; 4. rl Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate/ rural context; 5. r When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan; 1/11 Page 3 of 9 6. Fi The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO; or 7. The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway I Expressway as designated by Map 6.6, Thoroughfare Plan- Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Detailed explanation of condition identified above: NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the same time by the Planning &Zoning Commission. Requested Oversize Participation �joY`�' Total Linear Footage of Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: Proposed Public: ACREAGE: Streets 1185Sidewalks No. of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee - Sanitary Sewer Lines No. of acres in floodplain - Water Lines No. of acres in detention Channels No. of acres in greenways - Storm Sewers OR ' Bike Lanes/Paths FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: _ No. of SF Dwelling Units X $ _ $ (date)Approved by Parks& Recreation Advisory Board NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. LIEN HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as described above. 141. Signature and title Date 3 Y-1 45.r w,e0l+ 1/11 Page 4 of 9 CL iz 4n oz RM lz Z2 55 Nx 10 1 N. Gg lag IHN On .Sry - 5 ;A ra I E.1 nllilN 11INK;ggi I i i hp H��flj Hilgilji; di H IN, xam pi 4 DAaxl— cl 110iii T.4