HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/05/2014 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning Commission College Station, 1 /� College St teon,Xv77840
V/44*4
Meeting Agenda
Planning and Zoning Workshop
Thursday, June 5, 2014 6:30 PM City Hall Council Chambers
1 . Call the meeting to order.
2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items.
3. Discussion of Minor and Amending Plats approved by Staff.
• Final Plat — Minor Plat West Park Block 9 Lots 23R-1 , 23R-2, and 24R Case
#14-00900085 (M. Hester)
• Final Plat Minor Plat Castlegate Business Center Block 1 Lots 1 RA and 2 Case
#14-00900062 (J. Paz)
4. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. New Development
List
5. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the status of items within the
2014 P&Z Plan of Work (see attached). (J. Schubert)
Attachments: 2014 P&Z Plan of Work
6. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an update on the following items:
• A rezoning of approximately 8 acres located at 701 and 715 University Drive East from
GC (General Commercial) and OV (Corridor Overlay) to PDD (Planned Development
District). The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on May 1 and voted
4-0-1 to recommend approval. Chairman Miles abstained. The City Council heard this
item on May 12 and voted 6-0 to approve the request.
• A rezoning of approximately 2 acres located at 1806 Welsh Avenue from GC (General
Commercial) to Cl (Commercial Industrial). The Planning & Zoning Commission heard
this item on May 1 and voted 5-0 to recommend approval. The City Council heard this
item on May 22 and voted 7-0 to approve the request.
7. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design
Review Board, Joint Parks/Planning & Zoning Subcommittee, BioCorridor Board,
BioCorridor Plan Process, 5-Year Comprehensive Plan Review Subcommittee, and
Zoning District Subcommittee.
College Station, TX Page 1 Printed on 513012014
Planning and Zoning Workshop Meeting Agenda June 5, 2014
8. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning & Zoning Member
may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of
specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any
deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a
subsequent meeting.
9. Adjourn.
Consultation with Attorney (Gov't Code Section 551 .0711 ; possible action.
The Planning and Zoning Commission may seek advice from its attorney regarding a
pending and contemplated litigation subject or attorney-client privileged information. After
executive session discussion, any final action or vote taken will be in public. If litigation or
attorney-client privileged information issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this
Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, an executive session will be held.
Notice is hereby given that a Workshop Meeting of the College Station Planning & Zoning
Commission, College Station, Texas will be held on June 5, 2014 at 6:30 PM at City Hall
Council Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas. The following subjects
will be discussed, to wit: See Agenda.
Posted this the 30th day of May, 2014, at 5:00 p.m.
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
By:
Sherry Mashburn, City Secretary
By:
Kelly Templin, City Manager
I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the above Notice of the Workshop Meeting of the
Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of College Station, Texas, is a true and correct
copy of said Notice and that I posted a true and correct copy of said notice on the bulletin
board at City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, in College Station, Texas, and the City's website,
www.cstx.gov. The Agenda and Notice are readily accessible to the general public at all
times. Said Notice and Agenda were posted on May 30, 2014, at 5:00 p.m. and remained
so posted continuously for at least 72 hours preceding the scheduled time of said
meeting.
College Station, TX Page 2 Printed on 513012014
Planning and Zoning Workshop Meeting Agenda June 5, 2014
This public notice was removed from the official posting board at the College Station City
Hall on the following date and time: by
Dated this day of , 2014.
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
By
Subscribed and sworn to before me on this the day of , 2014.
Notary Public- Brazos County, Texas
My commission expires:
This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any
request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To
make arrangements call (979) 764-3541 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. Agendas may be
viewed on www.cstx.gov. Planning and Zoning Commission meetings are broadcast live
on Cable Access Channel 19.
College Station, TX Page 3 Printed on 513012014
2014 Planning & Zoning Commission Plan of Work
Comprehensive Plan Implementation
Implementation of Adopted Plans
Summary: Project Dates:
Implementation of adopted master plans and
neighborhood, district, and corridor plans, namely:
Central College Station, Eastgate, Southside Area,
Wellborn Community, and South Knoll Area
neighborhood plans, and Bicycle, Pedestrian &
Greenways, Parks and Recreation, Water, Waste
Water, Medical District, and Economic Development
master plans.
Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff jAnticipated Completion: On-going
Five-Year Comprehensive Plan Report
Summary: Project Dates:
As called for in the Comprehensive Plan, complete a 4/23/14: Joint subcommittee meeting.
five-year evaluation and appraisal report to assess 5/9/14: Joint subcommittee meeting.
existing Plan and its success in achieving the 6/3/14: Joint subcommittee meeting.
community's goals.
Staff Assigned: J. Prochazka JAnticipated Completion: Summer 2014
Five-Year Comprehensive Plan Report Implementation
Summary: Project Dates:
Begin implementation of items and tasks identified in
the Five-Year Comprehensive Plan Report.
Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff Anticipated Completion:
Multi-Family & Mixed Use Zoning Districts
Summary: Project Dates:
Create and adopt new zoning districts for Urban and
Urban Mixed Use designations to implement these
future land use and character designations identified in
the Comprehensive Plan.
Staff Assigned: J. Prochazka Anticipated Completion: Summer 2014
Walton Drive Commercial Overlay
Summary: Project Dates:
Create and adopt a zoning overlay to address parking 12/11/13: Stakeholder meeting with property owners to
and other non-conformities for the commercial area at introduce possible overlay concept.
Walton Drive and Texas Avenue as identified in the 5/15/14: Presentation at P&Z Workshop.
Eastgate Neighborhood Plan.
Staff Assigned: J. Schubert lAnticipated Completion: Summer 2014
Wellborn Zoning Districts
Summary: Project Dates:
Create and adopt new or modified zoning districts as
identifed in the Wellborn Community Plan.
Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff JAnticipated Completion: Fall 2014
Page 1 of 3
Research and Education
College Station Population
Summary: Project Dates:
Overview of College Station's current population 5/1/14: Presentation at P&Z Workshop.
estimate and report on implications of exceeding the
100,000 mark.
Staff Assigned: M. Hester I Item Completed: May 2014
Easterwood Airport Master Plan
Summary: Project Dates:
Report on Easterwood Airport Master Plan and
consideration of potential implications of any future
plans for expansion.
Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff JAnticipated Completion:
Non-Residential Architecture Standards
Summary: Project Dates:
Review existing standards to evaluate if updates are 6/19/14: Presentation at P&Z Workshop.
needed to reflect current practices and allow more
flexibility in design.
Staff Assigned: Jason Schubert JAnticipated Completion:
Planning & Development Services Organizational Review Implementation
Summary: Project Dates:
Continue implementation of the review by completing
identified policy discussions, ordinance revisions, and
process and service improvements.
Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff JAnticipated Completion:
Recently-Adopted Zoning Districts
Summary: Project Dates:
Overview of the recently adopted zoning disticts. 4/17/14: Presentation at P&Z Workshop.
Staff Assigned: T. Rogers Item Completed: April 2014
Review of Adopted Plans
Summary: Project Dates:
This item includes after action review of Northgate, 6/5/14: Tour during P&Z Workshop to include sites in
BioCorridor, and Medical Districts, update on Northgate, BioCorridor, and Medical District.
Water/Wastewater Master Plan, and update on
implementation of adopted neighborhood and small
area plans.
Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff JAnticipated Completion:
Page 2 of 3
Sign Regulations
Summary: Project Dates:
Evaluate sign regulations related to electronic message 5/12/14: Presentation at Council Workshop to receive
boards. direction from Council.
7/3/14: Proposed sign ordinance revisions
presented to P&Z for recommendation to Council.
Staff Assigned: M. Hester/J. Schubert JAnticipated Completion:
Transportation Planning
Summary: Project Dates:
Update regarding Metropolitan Planning Organization
(MPO) transportation planning initiatives.
Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff Anticipated Completion:
Page 3 of 3
College Station, 1X College St teon,Xv77840
V/44*4
Meeting Agenda
Planning and Zoning Commission
Regular
The City Council may or may not attend the Planning& Zoning
Commission Regular Meeting.
Thursday, June 5, 2014 7:00 PM Council Chambers
1 . Call meeting to order.
2. Pledge of Allegiance.
3. Hear Citizens.
At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address the
Commission on issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The citizen
presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who
wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the
agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into
the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is
made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.)
All matters listed under Item 4, Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the
Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans
and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision
regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff
recommendations. There will not be separate discussion of these items. If any
Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it will be moved to the
Regular Agenda for further consideration.
4. Consent Agenda
4.1 Consideration, possible action, and discussion regarding Absence Requests from
meetings.
* Casey Oldham - July 3, 2014
Attachments: PZ Absent Request Form 07 03 2014.pdf
4.2 Consideration, possible action, and discussion to approve meeting minutes.
* May 15, 2014 - Workshop
* May 15, 2014 - Regular
Attachments: May 15, 2014 Workshop.docx
May 15, 2014 Regular.docx
4.3 Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Indian Lakes
College Station, TX Page 1 Printed on 513012014
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda June 5, 2014
Regular
Phase 18 consisting of four residential lots on approximately 17.93 acres generally
located south of Anasazi Bluff Drive in the Indian Lakes Subdivision, approximately one
mile southwest of State Highway 6 in the City's Extraterritorial Jurisdiction.
Case#14-00900060 (M. Hester)
Attachments: Aerial
Application
Copy of Final Plat
Regular Agenda
5. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent
Agenda by Commission action.
6. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding waiver requests to Unified
Development Ordinance Section 12-8.3.G 'Blocks', Subdivision Regulations Section 8-J
'Blocks' (2006 Subdivision Regulations) , Section 12-8.3.V 'Private Streets and Gating of
Roadways', and Section 12-8.3.K 'Sidewalks' and a presentation, possible action, and
discussion on a Preliminary Plan for Mission Ranch (Great Oaks) Subdivision consisting of
523 single-family residential lots on approximately 289.2 acres generally located west of
Holleman Drive South and north of Rock Prairie Road West, bounded by the existing
Great Oaks Subdivision to the west, Rock Prairie Road West to the south, Quail Run
Subdivision to the north, and Holleman Drive South to the east. Case#14-00900012 (M.
Hester)
Attachments: Aerial
Application
Copy of Preliminary Plan
7. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a request to pay a fee into the
sidewalk fund in lieu of constructing the required sidewalk on Holleman Drive and public
hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat of the Woodson
Village, Fifth Installment Section 1 Lots 9R, Block 11 being a Replat of Woodson Village,
Fifth Installment Section 1 Lots 9, Block 11 and the adjoining former Hawthorne Street
right-of-way consisting of one lot on approximately 0.48 acres, located at 811 Holleman
Drive. Case#14-00900083 (J. Paz)
Attachments: Aerial & SAM.docx
Application.pdf
Copy of Final Plat.pdf
8. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an amendment to
Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by change the zoning
district boundaries from R Rural to GS General Suburban for approximately 3 acres for
the property Robertson Stevenson Survey Abstract No. 54 as described in Volume 8070,
Coiiege Station, TX Page 2 Printed on 5/30/2014
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda June 5, 2014
Regular
Page 226 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas, and more generally
located at 2668 Barron Road. Case #14-00900113 (J. Paz) (Note: Final action on this
item is scheduled for the June 12, 2014 City Council meeting - subject to change)
Attachments: Aerial & SAM.docx
Background Information.docx
Application.pdf
Rezoning Map.pdf
9. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance
approving a conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 12, "Unified Development
Ordinance," Section 12-3.16 "Development Review Procedures, Conditional Use Permit",
of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, to permit a Major
Wireless Telecommunication Facility (WTF) in R Rural zoning within a 26.25-acre tract
generally located at 1241 Flying Ace Circle along Rock Prairie Road. Case#14-00900030
(J. Paz) (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the June 26, 2014 City
Council meeting - subject to change)
Attachments: SAM&Aerial
Application
Site Plan
Visual Impact Analysis
10. Adjourn
The Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on this
agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion. An
announcement will be made of the basis for the Executive Session discussion.
College Station, TX Page 3 Printed on 513012014
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda June 5, 2014
Regular
APPROVED
City Manager
Notice is hereby given that a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of College
Station, Texas will be held on the June 5, 2014 at 7:OOPM at the City Hall Council
Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas. The following subjects will be
discussed, to wit: See Agenda.
Posted this 30th day of May 2014
City Secretary
I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the above Notice of Meeting of the Governing
Body of the City of College Station, Texas, is a true and correct copy of said Notice and
that I posted a true and correct copy of said notice on the bulletin board at City Hall ,
1101 Texas Avenue, in College Station, Texas, and the City's website, www.cstx.gov .
The Agenda and Notice are readily accessible to the general public at all times. Said
Notice and Agenda were posted on May 30, 2014 at 5:OOp.m. and remained so posted
continuously for at least 72 hours proceeding the scheduled time of said meeting. This
public notice was removed from the official posting board at the College Station City
Hall on the following:
date and time: by
Dated this _ day ,2014 By
College Station, TX Page 4 Printed on 5/30/2014
College Station, TX 1101 Texas Ave
College Station,TX 77840
�� �'
CITY 0COLLt Gh STATION
H...FZ z a�-M Gs—rs
Legislation Details (With Text)
File M 14-503 Version: 2 Name:
Type: Absence Request Status: Consent Agenda
File created: 5/27/2014 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission Regular
On agenda: 6/5/2014 Final action:
Title: Consideration, possible action, and discussion regarding Absence Requests from meetings.
* Casey Oldham —July 3, 2014
Sponsors:
Indexes:
Code sections:
Attachments: PZ Absent Request Form 07 03 2014.pdf
Date Ver. Action By Action Result
Consideration, possible action, and discussion regarding Absence Requests from meetings.
* Casey Oldham — July 3, 2014
College Station,TX Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/30/2014
powered by LegistarT"^
(*Or""
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Planning&Development Services
Absence Request Form
For Elected and Appointed Officers
Name Casey Oldham
Request Submitted on May 23, 2014
I will not be in attendance at the meeting of July 3, 2014
for the reason(s) specified: (Date)
Traveling
College Station, TX 1101 Texas Ave
4*0r,5"', College Station,TX 77840
CITY OE COLLEGE STATION
f
H...r,A&M Giinersi
Legislation Details (With Text)
File#: 14-504 Version: 1 Name:
Type: Minutes Status: Consent Agenda
File created: 5/27/2014 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission Regular
On agenda: 6/5/2014 Final action:
Title: Consideration, possible action, and discussion to approve meeting minutes.
* May 15, 2014 —Workshop
* May 15, 2014 — Regular
Sponsors:
Indexes:
Code sections:
Attachments: May 15, 2014 Workshop.pdf
May 15, 2014 Regular.pdf
Date Ver. Action By Action Result
Consideration, possible action, and discussion to approve meeting minutes.
* May 15, 2014 - Workshop
* May 15, 2014 - Regular
College Station,TX Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/30/2014
powered by LegistarTM
MINUTES
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Home ofTmzA&M Univeniiy' Workshop Meeting
May 15, 2014., 6:00 p.m.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
College Station, Texas
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Bo Miles, Jerome Rektorik, Jodi Warner, Jim Ross, Casey
Oldham
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Jane Kee
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Karl Mooney
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Lance Simms, Molly Hitchcock, Alan Gibbs, Jason Schubert,
Jennifer Prochazka, Danielle Singh, Morgan Hester, Jenifer Paz, Adam Falco, Jordan Wood,
Jeremy Alderete, and Brittany Caldwell
1. Call the meeting to order.
Chairman Miles called the meeting to order at 6:03 p.m.
2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items.
There was no discussion regarding consent and regular agenda items.
3. Discussion of Minor and Amending Plats approved by Staff.
• Final Plat—Amending Plat— Sherwood Heights Section 1, Lots 15R, 16R, & 17,
Block 1 Case#14-00900025 (J.Paz)
• Final Plat—Minor Replat—Northpoint Crossing Lots lA & 2A, Block 1 Case#14-
00900068 (J. Schubert)
Staff Planner Paz gave an overview of the Amending Plat for Sherwood Heights.
4. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. [New Development
List]
There was no discussion regarding new development applications submitted to the City.
5. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the status of items within the 2014
P&Z Plan of Work(see attached). (J. Schubert)
Principal Planner Schubert gave an update regarding the 2014 P&Z Plan of Work.
There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding the Plan of Work.
May 15,2014 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 3
6. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an overview of the Attendance
Policy for appointed officials serving on Boards and Commissions. (L. Simms)
Director Simms gave an overview of the Attendance Policy.
There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding the Policy.
7. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an overview of the Walton Drive
Commercial Overlay. (J. Schubert)
Principal Planner Schubert gave an overview of the Walton Drive Commercial Overlay.
There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding the Overlay.
8. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming
Meetings.
• Thursday, May 22, 2014 — City Council Meeting — Council Chambers — Workshop
6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. (Liaison—Warner)
• Thursday, May 29, 2014 — Joint P&Z Meeting with the City of Bryan — 11:30 a.m. to
1:00 p.m. — City of Bryan Council Chambers
• Thursday, June 5, 2014 — P&Z Meeting — Council Chambers — P&Z Tour 4:30 p.m.
and Regular 7:00 p.m.
Chairman Miles reviewed the meeting dates with the Commission.
9. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review
Board, Joint Parks / Planning & Zoning Subcommittee, BioCorridor Board, BioCorridor
Plan Process, 5-Year Comprehensive Plan Review Subcommittee, and Zoning District
Subcommittee.
Chairman Miles gave an update regarding the Design Review Board.
10. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning & Zoning Member
may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific
factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation
shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
There was no discussion regarding future agenda items.
11. Adjourn.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:59 p.m.
May 15,2014 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3
Approved: Attest:
Bo Miles,Chairman Brittany Caldwell,Admin. Support Specialist
Planning&Zoning Commission Planning&Development Services
May 15,2014 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION MINUTES
Home ofT"mA&M University* PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
May 15, 2014, 7:00 p.m.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
College Station, Texas
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Bo Miles, Jerome Rektorik, Jodi Warner, Jim Ross, Casey
Oldham
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Jane Kee
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Karl Mooney
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Lance Simms, Molly Hitchcock, Alan Gibbs, Jason Schubert,
Jennifer Prochazka, Danielle Singh, Morgan Hester, Jenifer Paz, Adam Falco, Jordan Wood,
Jeremy Alderete, and Brittany Caldwell
1. Call Meeting to Order
Chairman Miles called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m.
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Hear Citizens
No citizens spoke.
4. Consent Agenda
4.1 Consideration, possible action, and discussion on Absence Requests from
meetings.
• Jane Kee —May 1 and May 15, 2014
4.2 Consideration, possible action, and discussion to approve Meeting Minutes.
• May 1, 2014 —Workshop
• May 1, 2014 —Regular
Commissioner Rektorik motioned to approve Consent Agenda Items 4.1 and 4.2.
Commissioner Ross seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0).
May 15,2014 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 3
Regular Agenda
5. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent
Agenda by Commission action.
6. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an amendment to
Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12.4.2, "Official Zoning Map,"
of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by rezoning
approximately 21.8 acres for an approximate 7.2-acre tract of land in the Crawford
Burnett League, A-7, Abstract No. 7, College Station, Brazos County, Texas. Said tract
being a portion of the remainder of a called 22.91-acre tract as described by a deed to
Charles I Turner and Mery E Turner recorded in Volume 3331, Page 61 of the official
public records of Brazos County, Texas and an approximate 14.6-acre tract of land in the
Crawford Burnett League, A-7, College Station, Brazos County, Texas. Said tract being
a portion of the remainder of a called 22.97-acre tract as described by a deed to Charles I
Turner and Mary E Turner recorded in Volume 3331, Page 61 of the official public
records of Brazos County, Texas from R Rural to GS General Suburban and T
Townhouse. Case #14-00900067 (M. Hester) (Note: Final action on this item is
scheduled for the June 12,2014 City Council meeting— subject to change)
Staff Planner Hester presented the rezoning and recommended approval with the
condition that the gross density not exceed eight units per acre overall.
There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding the rezoning.
Chairman Miles opened the public hearing.
Joe Schultz, 3208 Innsbruck, College Station, Texas, engineer for the applicant, stated
that he was available for questions.
Chairman Miles closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Oldham motioned to recommend approval with the condition that
the gross density not exceed eight units per acre overall. Commissioner Ross
seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0).
7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning & Zoning Member
may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific
factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation
shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
There was no discussion regarding future agenda items.
8. Adjourn.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:07 p.m.
May 15,2014 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3
Approved: Attest:
Bo Miles,Chairman Brittany Caldwell,Admin. Support Specialist
Planning&Zoning Commission Planning &Development Services
May 15,2014 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3
College Station, TX College
S Texas Ave
College Station,TX 77840
CITY OE COLLEGE STATION
f
H...r,A&M Gii—Vrs
Legislation Details (With Text)
File#: 14-510 Version: 1 Name: Indian Lakes Ph 18 FP
Type: Final Plat Status: Consent Agenda
File created: 5/29/2014 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission Regular
On agenda: 6/5/2014 Final action:
Title: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Indian Lakes Phase 18
consisting of four residential lots on approximately 17.93 acres generally located south of Anasazi
Bluff Drive in the Indian Lakes Subdivision, approximately one mile southwest of State Highway 6 in
the City's Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. Case#14-00900060 (M. Hester)
Sponsors: Morgan Hester
Indexes:
Code sections:
Attachments: Aerial
Application
Copy of Final Plat
Date Ver. Action By Action Result
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Final Plat for Indian Lakes Phase 18 consisting of
four residential lots on approximately 17.93 acres generally located south of Anasazi Bluff Drive in the Indian
Lakes Subdivision, approximately one mile southwest of State Highway 6 in the City's Extraterritorial
Jurisdiction. Case#14-00900060 (M. Hester)
FINAL PLAT
for
Indian Lakes Ph 18
14-00900060
SCALE: Four residential lots on approximately 17.93 acres
LOCATION: Generally located south of Anasazi Bluff Drive in the Indian Lakes Subdivision, approximately
one mile southwest of State Highway 6 in the City's Extraterritorial Jurisdiction
ZONING: N/A (ETJ)
APPLICANT: Travis Martinek, Smiling Mallard Development, Ltd.
PROJECT MANAGER: Morgan Hester, Staff Planner
mhester(a-)cstx.gov
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat.
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: N/A (ETJ)
Zoning: N/A (ETJ)
College Station,TX Page 1 of 2 Printed on 5/30/2014
powered by LegistarTM
File #: 14-510, Version: 1
Preliminary Plat: September 2013
Site Development: Vacant. Four residential lots are proposed, ranging from 1.71 acres to 5.3 acres.
COMMENTS
Parkland Dedication: This development was approved as a Master Plan in the ETJ prior to parkland
dedication requirements being applicable in the ETJ. Therefore, no parkland dedication is required.
Greenways: N/A
Pedestrian Connectivity: This site is located in the ETJ so sidewalks are not required.
Bicycle Connectivity: This site is located in the ETJ and no specific facilities for bicycle connectivity are
required.
Impact Fees: N/A
REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance: The
Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Rural. The City, however, does not have land use authority
in the ETJ. The proposed lots will have access through rural residential streets that connect to Anasazi
Bluff Drive.
2. Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The Final Plat complies with the applicable
Subdivision Regulations contained in the Unified Development Ordinance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Aerial
2. Application
3. Copy of Final Plat
College Station,TX Page 2 of 2 Printed on 5/30/2014
powered by LegistarTM
by
z
C4 tEROKEE❑R
O
.. r
N
V
CO
— LL
[{L T LL
J
(1) m
w —
w3
U)
Z <
v Q Z
o
s — (D
Q � �
a z
�a
G
ry
p w
10 � d w
d C 0�
F-
w
-j
LUa
w
in
Planning &Zoning Commission
June 5, 2014
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY('�
CASE NO.. '"�
DATE SUBMITTED--=
1Il��v
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION TIME: am; `2: J
Home of Texas A&M University*
STAFF::
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
(Check one) ❑ Minor ❑ Amending ❑X Final ❑ Vacating ❑Replat
($700) ($700) ($932) ($932) ($932)
Is this plat in the ETJI? Fx-] Yes ❑ No Is this plat Commercial ❑ or Residential ❑X
// MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
VD $700-$932 Final Plat Application Fee (see above).
❑ $233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable).
❑ $600 (minimum) Development Permit Application / Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is
1%of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is> $600, the balance is
// due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit).
✓❑x Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and
may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
/�[X] Fourteen (14) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.)
❑ Two (2) copies of the grading, drainage, and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report.
Two (2) copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable).
Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable).
x Title report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate
current within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership, liens,
encumbrances, etc.
Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D.
The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
NOTE: A mylar of the approved preliminary plan must be on file before a final plat application will be considered
complete. If the mylar is submitted with the final plat application, it shall be considered a submittal for the
preliminary plan project and processed and reviewed as such. Until the mylar has been confirmed by staff
to be correct, the final plat application will be considered incomplete.
Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference N/A
NAME OF PROJECT Indian Lakes Phase 18
ADDRESS End of Anasazi Bluff Drive
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT:
End of Anasazi Bluff Drive
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name Travis Martinek E-mail travis@clarkewyndham.com
Street Address 3608 East 29th Street, Suite 100
City Bryan State Texas Zip Code 77802
Phone Number (979) 846-4384 Fax Number (979) 846-1461
1/11 Page 1 of 9
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (All owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple
owners):
Name Smiling Mallard Development, Ltd. E-mail travis@clarkewyndham.com
Street Address 3608 East 29th Street, Suite 100
City Bryan State Texas Zip Code 77802
Phone Number (979) 846-4384 Fax Number (979) 846-1461
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name McClure & Browne, Inc. E-mail leffr@mcc/urebrowne.com
Street Address 1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103
City College Station State Texas Zip Code 77845
Phone Number (979) 693-3838 Fax Number (979) 693-2554
Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property? ❑X Yes ❑ No
Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so, please provide the Volume NIA and Page No. N/A
Total Acreage 17.940 Total No. of Lots 4 R-O-W Acreage 0.000
Existing Use Vacant Proposed Use Single Family Residential
Number of Lots By Zoning District N/A / N/A N/A / N/A N/A / N/A
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
N/A / N/A N/A / N/A N/A / N/A N/A / N/A
Floodplain Acreage 0.000
Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? r Yes r No
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
rX Yes
F_ No
If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name: Indian Lakes
City Project Number(if known): Unknown
Date/Timeframe when submitted: 2000
1/11 Page 2 of 9
}
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan (if applicable):
/A
Requested waiver to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable):
/A
Regarding the waiver request, explain how:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the
subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.
/A
2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
/A
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other
property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
/A
4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance.
/A
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable):
1. r An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way;
2. r The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the
purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan;
3. F A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12) months;
4. r Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate/
rural context;
5. r When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Master Plan;
1/11 Page 3 of 9
6. r The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and
Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO; or
7. r The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway/ Expressway as designated by Map 6.6,
Thoroughfare Plan - Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Detailed explanation of condition identified above:
N/A
NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the
same time by the Planning &Zoning Commission.
Requested Oversize ParticipationN/A
Total Linear Footage of Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
Proposed Public:
ACREAGE:
Streets
No. of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee
Sidewalks
No. of acres in floodplain
Sanitary Sewer Lines
No. of acres in detention
Water Lines
No. of acres in greenways
Channels
OR
Storm Sewers
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
Bike Lanes/Paths
No. of SF Dwelling Units X$ _ $
(date)Approved by Parks & Recreation Advisory Board
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are
true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more
than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. LIEN
HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as
described above.
Signature and i Date
1/11 Page 4 of 9
FINAL PLAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
(Requirements based on field survey and marked by monuments and markers.)
❑x Drawn on 24" x 36" sheet to scale of 100' per inch.
FX_1 Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in
relationship to College Station and its City Limits. No scale required but include north arrow.
Title Block with the following information:
❑X Name and address of subdivider, recorded owner, planner, engineer and surveyor.
❑X Proposed name of subdivision. (Subdivision name & street names will be approved through Brazos
County 911.)
❑x Date of preparation.
FX Engineer's scale in feet.
❑x Total area intended to be developed.
❑X North Arrow.
❑X Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines.
❑X If more than 1 sheet, an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or
larger.
❑x All applicable certifications based on the type of final plat.
❑x Ownership and Dedication
❑x Surveyor and/or Engineer
❑x City Engineer(and City Planner, if a minor plat)
❑X Planning and Zoning Commission (delete if minor plat)
❑X Brazos County Clerk
Fx Brazos County Commissioners Court Approval (ETJ Plats only)
FX If submitting a replat where there are existing improvements, submit a survey of the subject property
showing the improvements to ensure that no encroachments will be created.
0 If using private septic systems, add a general note on the plat that no private sewage facility may be
installed on any lot in this subdivision without the issuance of a license by the Brazos County
Health Unit under the provisions of the private facility regulations adopted by the Commissioner's
Court of Brazos County, pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.084 of the Texas Water Code.
❑x Location of the 100-Year Floodplain and floodway, if applicable, according to the most recent available
data.
Lot corner markers and survey monuments (by symbol) and clearly tied to basic survey data.
❑X Matches the approved preliminary plan or qualifies as minor amendments (LIDO Section 3.3.E.2).
Fx7 The location and description with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii, area, center
angle, degree of curvature, tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the
following: (Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a
boundary with the subdivision, as well as, those within the subdivision).
Existing Proposed
F ❑X Streets. Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac, stubbed out streets must end into a temp
turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet.
Q ❑X Public and private R.O.W. locations and widths. (All existing and proposed R.O.W.'s
sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan.)
❑X ❑X Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance.
1/11 Page 8 of 9
S
Existing Proposed
❑X ❑X Alleys.
0 Easements.
0 ❑X A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block(numbered sequentially).
0 ❑X Parkland dedication/greenbelt area/park linkages. All proposed dedications must be
reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and documentation of their
recommendation provided prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration.
❑X Construction documents for all public infrastructure drawn on 24" x 36" sheets and properly
sealed by a Licensed Texas Professional Engineer that include the following:
❑X Street, alley and sidewalk plans, profiles and sections. One sheet must show the overall
street, alley and/or sidewalk layout of the subdivision. (may be combined with other
utilities).
F Sewer Design Report.
❑X Sanitary sewer plan and profile showing depth and grades. One sheet must show the
overall sewer layout of the subdivision. (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility
master plan and any future growth areas.)
❑X Water Design Report and/or Fire Flow Report.
❑X Water line plan showing fire hydrants, valves, etc. with plan and profile lines showing
depth and grades. One sheet must show the overall water layout of the subdivision.
(Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth
areas.)
❑X Storm drainage system plan with contours, street profile, inlets, storm sewer and
drainage channels, with profiles and sections. Drainage and runoff areas, and runoff
based on 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 year rain intensity. Detailed drainage structure design,
channel lining design & detention if used. One sheet must show the overall drainage
layout of the subdivision.
F Detailed cost estimates for all public infrastructure listed above sealed by Texas P.E.
❑X Letter of completion for public infrastructure or guarantee/surety in accordance with UDO
Section 8.6.
❑X Drainage Report with a Technical Design Summary.
Fx-i Erosion Control Plan (must be included in construction plans).
All off-site easements necessary for infrastructure construction must be shown on the final plat with a
volume and page listed to indicate where the separate instrument easements were filed.
Separate instrument easements must be provided in recordable form to the City prior to being scheduled
for P&Z Commission consideration.
❑X Are there impact fees associated with this development? ❑ Yes ❑X No
Impact fees must be paid prior to building permit.
❑X Will any construction occur in TxDOT rights-of-way? ❑ Yes ❑X No
If yes, TxDOT permit must be submitted along with the construction documents.
NOTE: 1. We will be requesting the corrected Final Plat to be submitted in digital form if available prior to filing
the plat at the Courthouse.
2. If the construction area is greater than 5 acres, EPA Notice of Intent(NOI) must be submitted prior to
issuance of a development permit.
Print Form
1/11 Page 9 or 9
t-
9c� m �
�'V,\
•' ' vim. _ _ ,6 Q '�tl'411 � � `, � Q� �J N$ ���$6
U + -
m m E
° sa i/o- mli
3a p• Egs§ _' t I
1M g��fr 1 � �e � •I as
aim 51 ilk
OR
a�
g 3 sa3 � a
n= g
r f\
o 9
�sr
r-4
T
Y�m m m---"n n !r iJ r i 1 5� 4 ♦♦ =ffr
J
^grl1Y
�C I i I I 11
ft 1`
1116 �I III IIL —_--gp'o — -- 'I
b —— —
----
�_�
It a�a 'ge a g� a a� .< � •€; a a5a rz B
Y`s3'pu�'�� ,='sire"
e:s .
51 S # PR Oe'�",
e Ee.. § �aF� ee# EF" -&i- °� Sys•
a s ,.. 'sa ses
h=z � g-3 ;�'
€ ,sash:s co gkv2 OSP
:s'F� -= s §
'€$_g OMNI
3eS X `ۥ
$a Na��M°e gg 5 He
AIR sa°8�� 4 �E'�d t�§$€�e�a_ ��e#�$'�s:" •'afr s sus x ��
9�€ e� `s'= ?• ieou g8==s ->,.egE �€ E. Fagg s., s:� .a
e_ag='8"s 5 s m€ '^'S` sa§^E °pass° i i ss6 NJ!�3 R =;'a£aS€�'='>°8 S xgsa-°-°! s--
5sg8F€ T .at �Sas:t« . g-e€ :#�€$r .€8'q €p 35 r3 5�� " eta F`g
{sS
F�€ s€:€ a ag�e a�t�����.��"�� 5FB$�� F�� x.
8� f e= ;§�e g ` U`" a #C a@ Dg &- e= sg € &3 Hu A
so zt ae� a €_$ zee 65HUH§ z' ase $.5= j$3$ eea egp ;P3 3 €$ �€
®o -�• +¢ saLL s -x 8k= ,aa . Fa4 t
ph p g ses° A°-s#° .
���N y I NOR^ 9a'ss 3 :dia�mg g
€[fi•fi -g38 Mon.
3 so x° R..s YCF�y� ±§i�^ a%S:$g$ S ffi d
i-s•fi`"'x�'_fi �. a�='a'sie�� ,.€a' �€ �� � g° �x a $.:>➢n:asam a s e�g @@'x Y
S 66£54'Ec°A 36 2=� •5 .d H., s E i$ H °dv.. S Sid
E^'E"cgs =0 9sx Esa9a a€ a°a -# €sffi sa � „�c«-._ ."^ _ . �
` €�€a�? §bj ma3sa �€ eG sa
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
PRELIMINARY PLAN
for
Mission Ranch Subdivision
14-00900012
SCALE: 523 single-family residential lots on approximately 289.2 acres
LOCATION: Generally located west of Holleman Drive South and north of Rock
Prairie Road West, bounded by the existing Great Oaks
Subdivision to the west, Rock Prairie Road West to the South,
Quail Run Subdivision to the north, and Holleman Drive South to
the east.
ZONING: RS Restricted Suburban
APPLICANT: Clint Cooper, BCS Rock Prairie, LP
PROJECT MANAGER: Morgan Hester, Staff Planner
mhester@cstx.gov
PROJECT OVERVIEW: The proposal is to plat 523 single-family residential lots, zoned RS
Restricted Suburban. The northern portion of the subdivision was
part of the original Great Oaks master plan area is vested to 2006
regulations; however, the southern half of this development is
subject to current Subdivision Regulations. The applicant is
seeking waivers to block length, gating of a public street, and
sidewalks requirements.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the block length waivers and the
gating of Haverford Road, a public street. Staff recommends
approval of the sidewalk waiver request with the condition that the
proposed private trails and sidewalks be constructed. If the
Planning & Zoning Commission approves all of the waivers, the
Preliminary Plan will be in compliance with the remaining
Subdivision Regulations and Staff would recommend approval. If
any of the waiver requests are denied, the Preliminary Plan must
also be denied.
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 1 of 6
June 5, 2014
!y F D Q
a°s sa <
LU
Od,
04.4#
9
$ 4 0
4 4p p r
19.
AL ° M
4M� D .s
ac��o
. t 0
❑ ❑
off& W
(0 �
4 a u IL
Q U
7 y
00
W o0
m D� r—
�° ���� LU
LU
w
Q
0-
0
� J
2 W
o LU
a
Y�
�G
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 2 of 6
June 5,2014
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: March 2008
Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open upon annexation
R-1 B Single-Family Residential May 2008 (retired 2013)
A-O Agricultural Open renamed R Rural (2013)
RS Restricted Suburban January 2014
Site development: Vacant. 523 single-family residential lots are proposed averaging
13,000 square feet in size.
COMMENTS
Water: The subject tract is located in Wellborn Special Utility District
water service area.
Sewer: A portion of the tract is located in the Steeplechase Sanitary
Sewer Impact Fee Area. A 12-inch sanitary sewer line has been
extended to the property. A lift station is proposed to be built with
this development to serve the property.
Off-site Easements: None at this time.
Drainage: The subject tract is located in the Hopes Creek Drainage Basin.
Development of the subject tract will be required to meet the City's
Storm Water Design Guidelines.
Flood Plain: There is no FEMA regulated flood plain on the property.
Greenways: N/A
Pedestrian Connectivity: The vested portion of Great Oaks was originally Master Planned in
the ETJ; therefore, no sidewalks are proposed or required. In the
new portion, sidewalks will be required for pedestrian connectivity.
Portions are proposed to be privately maintained. A waiver to the
requirement of providing sidewalks on both sides of the street is
being sought.
Bicycle Connectivity: The vested portion of Great Oaks was originally Master Planned in
the ETJ; therefore, no bike lanes are proposed or required. In the
new portion, bikes lanes on both sides of Deacon Drive and
Feather Run will be required.
Streets: Access will be provided to the development via Feather Run, an
existing road from Quail Run Estates, and Deacon Drive.
Oversize Request: None at this time.
Parkland Dedication Fees: The vested portion of Great Oaks was originally Master Planned in
the ETJ prior to parkland dedication requirements and therefore
no parkland dedication is required. The new portion is subject to
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 3 of 6
June 5, 2014
Parkland Dedication fees and this will be assessed on 333 lots,
totaling $419,913.
Impact Fees: A portion of the subject tract is located within the Steeplechase
Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Area and will be required to pay
$144.87/LUE with building permits.
REVIEW CRITERIA
Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and Subdivision Regulations: The
Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Restricted Suburban. New residential zoning
districts were adopted in September 2013 to be synonymous with the Comprehensive Plan and
Great Oaks (Mission Ranch) Subdivision is the first to utilize RS Restricted Suburban. This
portion of Rock Prairie Road West is shown as a future 2-lane major collector on the
Thoroughfare Plan. Four 2-lane minor collectors are shown on the Thoroughfare Plan that was
adopted in 2009. This Preliminary Plan is in general compliance with the Future Land Use and
Character Restricted Suburban designation on the Comprehensive Plan.
Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The proposed Preliminary Plan was reviewed
using both the Subdivision Regulations applicable to the project when the master plan was
originally approved in January 2007 (the northern portion) and the current UDO's Subdivision
Regulations, implemented in 2013 (the southern portion). It is in compliance with all
requirements with the exception of the following waiver requests:
• UDO Section 12-8.3.G 'Blocks' - The applicant is requesting a waiver to the twelve-
hundred (1,200) feet maximum block length along Rock Prairie Road West, Holleman
Drive South, and Deacon Drive West. The proposed block lengths exceed the maximum
by approximately five-hundred (500) feet, eight-hundred eighty-five (885) feet, and six-
hundred seventy (670) feet, respectively.
• Subdivision Regulations Section 8-J 'Blocks' (2006 Subdivision Regulations) - The
applicant is requesting a waiver to the twelve-hundred (1,200) feet maximum block
length in Section 8-J for Feather Run. This portion of the roadway is located in the
vested half of Great Oaks (Mission Ranch) Subdivision. The proposed block length
exceeds the maximum by approximately six-hundred eighty (680) feet.
• UDO Section 12-8.3.V 'Private Streets and Gating of Roadways' - The applicant is
requesting a waiver to the prohibition of gating a public roadway on Haverford Road, the
street connecting the subdivision to University Heights, a single-family residential
subdivision to the east. By gating this street, the applicant believes traffic through
University Heights and Mission Ranch will be reduced.
• UDO Section 12-8.3.K 'Sidewalks' - The applicant is requesting a waiver to the
requirement of providing a public sidewalk on both sides of all streets in the non-vested
portion of the subdivision. Private trails through common areas and some public
sidewalks on streets throughout the vested and non-vested portions of the subdivision
have been proposed.
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 4 of 6
June 5, 2014
In accordance with the Subdivision Regulations, when considering a waiver, the Planning and
Zoning Commission should make the following findings to approve the waiver:
1) That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved
such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant
of the reasonable use of his land;
The applicant states that they do not feel that additional connections are necessary for
circulation within the subdivision; however, there is no restriction to the land that prohibits
compliance with established ordinances. Additionally, not providing adequate access has
the potential to create traffic and safety concerns within the development and adjacent to the
future CSISD school site on Holleman Drive West and Rock Prairie Road West by
concentrating traffic at few intersections.
The applicant states that gating Haverford Road will decrease traffic through the subdivision
and University Heights, the adjacent single-family residential subdivision to the east.
Special circumstances or conditions that give merit to preventing access between single-
family subdivisions do not exist.
Sidewalks and trails will be provided through the vested portion of the subdivision, which are
not required, on one side of the street as well as on one side of some streets in the non-
vested portion. Because of this, the applicant feels that the intent of providing sidewalks
throughout the subdivision has been met. Special circumstances do not exist that would not
prevent the applicant from meeting this ordinance requirement of providing sidewalks on
both sides of the street in the non-vested portion.
2) That the waivers are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial
property right of the applicant;
The applicant states that because they are creating a product that provides adequate
access, drainage and utilities in a different way that standard procedure, they are being
denied their property rights in determining what is ultimately best for their development.
3) That the granting of the waivers will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,
or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering
this chapter; and
The intent of maximum block length requirement is to create uniform access and circulation.
By increasing the distance between connecting streets, the potential increases for traffic
choke points and delay or reduced access for emergency services to navigate through and
around the subdivision. In this case, granting the block length waivers may be detrimental
to the public health, safety, and welfare.
4) That the granting of the waivers will not have the effect of preventing the orderly
subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this
chapter.
As mentioned previously, the intent of block length requirements is to allow for uniform
access and circulation through developments and between them. Increasing the length
between connecting streets can prevent the orderly subdivision of land in the area.
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 5 of 6
June 5, 2014
Additionally, when a street is gated, connectivity is lost and a larger, less efficient block is
created. If Haverford Road is gated, the traffic circulation is limited and common access
between the Mission Ranch and University Heights subdivisions will be effectively broken.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends denial of the block length waivers and the gating of Haverford Road, a public
street. Staff recommends approval of the sidewalk waiver request with the condition that the
proposed private trails and sidewalks be constructed. If the Planning & Zoning Commission
approves the waivers, the Preliminary Plan will be in compliance with the remaining Subdivision
Regulations and Staff would recommend approval. If the waiver requests are denied, the
Preliminary Plan must also be denied.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Aerial
2. Application
3. Copy of Preliminary Plan
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 6 of 6
June 5, 2014
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO.: I �i
_ DATE SUBMITTED: �a I
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION TIME:
Home of Texas A6M- University' STAFF:
PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
[J $932 Preliminary Plan Application Fee.
$233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable).
X Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used
and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
Fourteen (14)folded copies of plan.A revised mylar original must be submitted after approval.
Title report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate
current within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership, liens,
encumbrances, etc.
[ Impact study (if oversized participation is requested).
[XI The attached Preliminary Plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are
not.
Date of Optional Preapplication Conference
NAME OF PROJECT Great Oaks Subdivision
ADDRESS Rock Prairie Road West and Holleman Drive
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION:
At the northwest corner of Rock Prairie Road West and Holleman Drive
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name BCS Rock Prairie, LP E-mail ccooper@caldwellcos.com
Street Address 1700 Research Pkwy Ste 110
City College Station State Tx —Zip Code 77845
Phone Number 979-260-7000 Fax Number
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (ALL owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple
owners):
Name Same as applicant E-mail
Street Address
City State Zip Code
Phone Number Fax Number
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name McClure and Browne Engineering(Jeff Robertson) E-mail jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com
Street Address 1008 Woodcreek
City College Station State Tx Zip Code 77845
Phone Number 979-693-3838 Fax Number
1/11 Page 1 of
Total Acreage 289.2 Total No. of Lots 523 R-O-W Acreage 55.8
Number of Lots By Zoning District 523 / RS
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
0.30 / RS
Floodplain Acreage 0
NOTE: Appropriate zoning for the proposed subdivision must be in place before this application can be
considered complete.
Are you proposing to dedicate park land by acreage or fee in lieu of land?
Are you proposing to r-, develop the park r dedicate the development fee? (Check one)
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s)and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
�; Yes
F- No
If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name: Great Oaks Subdivision
City Project Number(in known):
Date/Timeframe when submitted: 2007
Requested wavier to subdivision regulations and reason for same(if applicable):
1/11 Page 2 of 6
Regarding the waiver request, explain how:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the
subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.
2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other
property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance.
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable):
1. r An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way;
2. r The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the
purposes and goals of the LIDO or the City's comprehensive Plan;
3. r A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12) months;
4. r Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate/
rural context;
5. r When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Master Plan;
1/11 Page 3 of 6
6. r-1 The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria In Platting and
Replalling within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO;or
7. [I The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway I Expressway as designated by Map 6.6,
Thoroughfare Plan-Functional Classification, In the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Detailed explanation of condition Identified above:
NOTE; A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee In lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the
same time by the Planning&Zoning Commission.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached
hereto are true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE
OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from
the owner. If there is more than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If
the owner is a company, the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's
representative to sign the application on its behalf. LIEN HOLDERS Identified In the title report are also
considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as described above.
`vl l
Signature and title Date y
�/� Page 4 of 6
Block Length Waivers I
Regarding the waiver request, explain how:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the
subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.
rs su ivision h as been master planned y land p a-nners, architects, ari engineers w o i notee a di[ror�aJ
connections to Rock Prairie Road, Holleman Drive, Haverford Road or Deacon Drive are necessary for circulation
within the subdivision or regional traffic flow. Keeping the number of connections to the major thoroughfares low will
improve the traffic conditions on those roadways as well.
2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
Tod deny a developer, w o wJs es o create a product that provides adequate access, drainage, and utilities in a way
that is slightly different than the standard procedure is a denial of the developer's 'enjoyment of substantial property
rights.'
_ 1
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other
property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
h duc[ror7 of street ir�tersec sans and conr�ectrons t�7 a r roadways wr �nerease pu itic sa ety y reducing the
umber of potential traffic conflict points.
4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance.
ost a t e blockeng r waivers are notadjacentto other developments. a ave Diel Road waiver is adjacent n to
roject that is currently being developed(University Heights). That development has access to Holleman Drive and
he neighboring properties.
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable):
1. r An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way;
2. I— The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the
purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan;
3. F A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve(12)months;
4. f Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate/
rural context;
5. r` When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Master Plan;
Revised 4/14 Page 3 of 6
Haverford Road Gate Waiver
Regarding the waiver request, explain how:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the
subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.
public connection to University Heights will increase the tra is on the residential streets in University Heights an
the through the Mission Ranch subdivision. University Heights has adequate connections to Holleman Drive and the
neighboring property.
2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
To deny a developer, who wishes to create a product that provides adequate access, dramage, and unities in a way
that is slightly different than the standard procedure is a denial of the developer's 'enjoyment of substantial property
rights.'
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other
property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
The reduction of public street intersections and connections to other roadways wili increase public safety by reducing
the number of potential traffic conflict points.
4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance.
The Haverford Roadwaiver is adjacent to project that is currently being developed(University Heig ts). That
development has access to Holleman Drive and the neighboring properties.
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable).
1. F An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way;
2. r The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the LIDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the
purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan;
3. F A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12) months;
4. F_ Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate/
rural context;
5. F_ When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Master Plan;
Revised 4/14 Page 3 of 6
Sidewalk Plan Waiver
Regarding the waiver request, explain how:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the
subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.
'The northern half of this site is vested to a previous master plan that did nat requira sidewalks along the roadways,
The southern half is a new application and would normally be required to provide sidewalks on both sides of streets.
In order to make the development feel congruent between the two sides, the developer wants to build a sidewalk an
raft systern that will provide a sidewalk on one side of most streets and a large trail along the main roads.
2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
a deny a developer, who wrs es to create a product a provides adequate access, drainage, an u t I Res in a way
that is slightly different than the standard procedure is a denial of the developer's 'enjoyment of substantial property
rights'.
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other
property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
The development wr prove e a wa irig sys em or pe es mans along t e roadways. Many of these sidewalks will
'rrreander'away from the roadway to provide additional distance between the traffic and the pedestrians. This will
have a positive impact on the safety of the pedestrians.
4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance.
he walk system will be internal to the development and will not cause any effect on neighboring props tes.
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable):
1. I— An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way;
2. F_ The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the
purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan;
3. F A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12) months;
4. r" Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate/
rural context;
5. F- When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Master Plan;
1/11 Page 3 of 6
E Jov .L J Nm
r
HSA
nix
HIS H
BUR
ell IoaO 10
Nh
QQ
10
LL I'l
fqv
j0-
slit
171
-At Nk hq
Ilio —=�_-2_ `_'_� \ '�111�3H"�'L6'lY - m _.,J � I "! �,� u��_
Am,
iw
T 711—
AN
�V
-7- Jr
2
f--A
JL ... ... . . . .
Jr
----------
Y
t e
V � g
1^w Q! �ern a :hcgyA
VM 0
hh �
O gN3ry�
_ m
%♦� iu.o --.,,__ �a�_ �I - nnnnnrn
_ �" I" � sasses"aa"sasses
T.....�aa
a � � n ,. . , �I 33333533333333
I I _ – \ r em� — –nm�� ` ffi�a�0 g •E m "� �aa9=«^_sggC^°'R
gg4gL�q $
r$d$
d
�jq
el
) J O/ � � - $Pa/ �� m\r"� �.P"h�4 o sCN ✓ � �j\�8� .\/ „� � I Ni I/ w�
J `
r I s
sem rno
_ k
I
Y
t e
V � g
1^w Q! �ern a :hcgyA
VM 0
O
cry � L V1 �i5m2
V1,4 GO
O gN3N
El
AL / / ��/' o ,, 0 bbbbbnbnbnbnbb
_-_
lall
a
y
// ah�l��• � , e m awE m m� din �m /
Y
t e
V � g
1^w Q! �ern a :hcgyA
VM 0
� o
O gN3N
III W ��
asasaffiaffiaffia�aa
_...7T..... ,
J�/ t �� ��
.... ..-.-^--
--------------
fill sill
�7
n,J•F iii�i /?�j \�' _ i ?,y///;'/ l
I J J/
_ � d
E f�j 6 ��,q, l r�!�l,� ����� �/�—����� ��I j ��� ill ✓ 0.'
i I�
F—
.-7
�b—,s,M.
KI
Oz
Qp 44V
L �L / JJ L
If
Y
t e
V � g
1^w Q! �ern a :hcgyA
VM 0
JO
— �l tiQ=�oru E _ 6� 33333533333333
�p
-i. 4 �„
4/V ko
T \ IN
/
W
11 � ® �
� w X61
College Station, TX College
S Texas Ave
College Station,TX 77840
CITY OE COLLEGE STATION
f
H...r nA&M Giro Vrs
Legislation Details (With Text)
File#: 14-478 Version: 1 Name: Woodson Village Fifth Installment
Type: Replat Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 5/22/2014 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission Regular
On agenda: 6/5/2014 Final action:
Title: Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a request to pay a fee into the sidewalk fund
in lieu of constructing the required sidewalk on Holleman Drive and public hearing, presentation,
possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat of the Woodson Village, Fifth Installment Section 1
Lots 9R, Block 11 being a Replat of Woodson Village, Fifth Installment Section 1 Lots 9, Block 11 and
the adjoining former Hawthorne Street right-of-way consisting of one lot on approximately 0.48 acres,
located at 811 Holleman Drive. Case#14-00900083 (J. Paz)
Sponsors:
Indexes:
Code sections:
Attachments: Aerial &SAM.pdf
Application.pdf
Copy of Final Plat.pdf
Date Ver. Action By Action Result
Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a request to pay a fee into the sidewalk fund in lieu of
constructing the required sidewalk on Holleman Drive and public hearing, presentation, possible action, and
discussion on a Final Plat of the Woodson Village, Fifth Installment Section 1 Lots 9R, Block 11 being a Replat
of Woodson Village, Fifth Installment Section 1 Lots 9, Block 11 and the adjoining former Hawthorne Street
right-of-way consisting of one lot on approximately 0.48 acres, located at 811 Holleman Drive.
Case#14-00900083 (J. Paz)
FINAL PLAT
for
Woodson Village, Fifth Installment Section 1 Lots 9R, Block 11
being a Replat of
Woodson Village, Fifth Installment Section 1 Lots 9, Block 11 and the adjoining former Hawthorne
Street Right-of-Way
14-00900083
SCALE: One single-family lot on 0.48 acres
LOCATION: 811 Holleman Drive
ZONING: GS General Suburban
APPLICANT: Jill Giroir, Owner
PROJECT MANAGER: Jenifer Paz, Staff Planner
Ipaz(a)cstx.gov
College Station,TX Page 1 of 2 Printed on 5/30/2014
powered by LegistarTM
File #: 14-478, Version: 1
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the applicant's request to pay $1,870 into the
sidewalk fund in lieu of construction of the sidewalks. If use of the sidewalk fund is approved, staff
recommends approval of the Final Plat.
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: May 1956
Zoning: R-1 Single-Family Residential renamed to GS General Suburban (2013)
Preliminary Plan: Property was platted prior to the requirement of Preliminary Plans.
Site Development: Single-family and former Hawthorne Street right-of-way abandoned by the City Council
on February 27, 2014 (Ordinance No. 3553).
COMMENTS
Parkland Dedication: This replat is not creating any additional residential lots.
Greenways: None.
Pedestrian Connectivity: Sidewalks along the north side of Holleman Drive are proposed on the Bike,
Pedestrian and Greenways Master Plan. The applicant is requesting to pay into the sidewalk fund (Sidewalk
Zone 3) in lieu of construction of the sidewalk.
Bicycle Connectivity: Bike lanes currently exist on Holleman Drive
Impact Fees: None.
REVIEW CRITERIA
Compliance with Subdivision Regulations:
The applicant has requested that the Commission approve a request to pay into the sidewalk fund in lieu of
construction of the required sidewalk. The Commission may authorize a fee in lieu of sidewalk construction
when it is determined a condition exists as stated in the Subdivision Regulations. The subject property is
located in Sidewalk Zone 3 and the fee in lieu amount is $1,870 (62 linear feet x 6-foot wide sidewalk x $5 per
square foot). The Thoroughfare Plan designates Holleman Drive as a two-lane Major Collector which requires
a standard right-of-way width of 77 feet and there is currently only 50 feet of right-of-way. Additionally, the
Bike, Pedestrian and Greenways Master Plan proposes a sidewalk on the north side of Holleman Drive, from
the existing sidewalk at HEB, on the corner of Holleman Drive and Texas Avenue, to Wellborn Road as a long-
term priority given that there is insufficient right-of-way. The proposed Final Plat otherwise complies with the
Subdivision Requirements contained in the Unified Development Ordinance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of the applicant's request to pay $1,870 into the sidewalk fund in lieu of
construction of the sidewalks. If use of the sidewalk fund is approved, staff recommends approval of the Final
Plat.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Aerial and Small Area Map (SAM)
2. Application
3. Copy of Final Plat
College Station,TX Page 2 of 2 Printed on 5/30/2014
powered by LegistarTM
f _
A
?7Cj
LIJ
H � a
LLJ
•�,� wJ
f
� J
Z Q
PJ W
P¢ uj
J r"
J Ca
z
.� O
0' N
` Aq o
ir
t LU
z
LU
a
J
I W
3
W
4]
2
r o,
r w N 0 � S
CD LU obi a R m N Q
c0 N r M1 L1 p J
T. N R N X `x V v a '� CL
01) 4 LLLLJ
w0,G p N« 9 O U
r u7 �kp N *t Gs in N rc0�1_ c m 4
a x r a 9 d
it
P e+l
OD -4 V
LE) r ry M
r) C7 t7 SA 9[l C
- LL
r LO m
N
M -/ N cri
d' -
y6� 494
r E r
N . z r r
LnN Fai p p
dry
r V 8
r�(] two
to '� $ "� $'9LL� jr
r
ar-- [; r N 7� r• Vr ry�pj �
qlp
O9 t3�- r r r d a I .1 cli
4tl P
s �•
* r Lf) w
lSy� r ry C \` m J
r r wQ
oaD T ,r r to
co "
ca IL
N t0
r N � s R O ¢ en \\ LO
� r
I.L f W) Lo N cU t_
61 03 r LL 9 q
IP41 o
(v m M a �a ou',t,eam
to
w r �� R . 1110 V' n Eli
in
CD
LL7 eu'Q m. III
C.1 a LL7 !K LL? I t
Lo O /'tri In
rr.
CD r ,. L1J
CY
[+1
R
I.Li
to
'• m LOy \ rn E
O - -�I 1 I
r LLI
y I I 1`
++Y v Y r � C m
r .,.r N NW�47�0F
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO.:
DATE SUBMITTED:
CITY OF COLLEGE✓STATION TIME:
P4�
4,1
Home ofT4=A6-A9 Vmvers!V* V e �J s, `,1 �f STAFF:
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
(Check one) ❑ Minor ❑ Amending ❑ Final ❑ Vacating ❑Replat
($700) ($700) ($932) ($932) ($932)
Is this plat in the ETJ7 ❑ Yes D?No Is this plat Commercial ❑ or Residential
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
$700-$932 Final Plat Application Fee(see above).
$233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee(if applicable).
$600 (minimum) Development Permit Application / Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is
1%of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum(if fee is>$600,the balance is
due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit).
Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and
may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
Fourteen(14)folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.)
Two(2)copies of the grading, drainage, and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report.
Two(2)copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents(if applicable).
Nr Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats(if applicable).
Title report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate
current within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership, liens,
encumbrances, etc.
Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D.
The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
NOTE: A mylar of the approved preliminary plan must be on file before a final plat application will be considered
complete. If the mylar is submitted with the final plat application, it shall be considered a submittal for the
preliminary plan project and processed and reviewed as such. Until the mylar has been confirmed by staff
to be correct, the final plat application will be considered incomplete.
Date of Optional Preapplication or Storm+water Management Conference
NAME OF PROJECTIII
�,i �c�Ix
ADDRESS X(I _
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT:
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION(Primary contact for the project):
Name a 1 G , .c'c r' .— E-mail -} w, ,c,a on
Street Address
City Lr4 lrc c .S+C,A k`4?�n State � Zip Code
Phone Number0 I Fax Number
1111 Page 1 of 9
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan(if applicable):
Requested waiver to subdivision regulations and reason for same if a licable):
��,A -- .J1
Regarding the waiver request, explain how:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the
_subdivislon ro utations will de rive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.
2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other
property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance.
Fee In lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition(if applicable):
1. [7 An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way;
2. X The presence of unique or unusual topographic,vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the
purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan;
3. 7 A capital improvement project is imminent that will Include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve(12)months;
4. r,— Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate/
rural context;
5. r When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Master Plan;
1111 Page 3 of 9
6. F; The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and
Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO;or
7. F The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway/Expressway as designated by Map 6.6,
Thoroughfare Plan- Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Detailed explanation of condition identified above:
The proposed sidewalk along the north side of Holleman Drive is a long-term priority on the Pedestrian Master
Plan so requiring the construction of the sidewalk at this time is not in keeping with the purposes and goals of the
ODO or Comprehensive Plan. m
NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the
same time by the Planning&Zoning Commission.
Requested Oversize Participation
Total Linear Footage of Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
Proposed Public:
ACREAGE:
Streets
Sidewalks No. of acres to be dedicated +$ development fee
Sanitary Sewer Lines No, of acres in floodplain
Water Lines No. of'acres in detention
No. of acres in greenways
Channels
OR
Storm Sewers
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
Bike Lanes/Paths
No. of SF Dwelling Units X$ _ $
(date)Approved by Parks&Recreation Advisory Board
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are
true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more
than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. LIEN
HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as
described above.
Executive Vice President & CEO 05/06/14
Signature and title Date
Revised 4/14 Page 4 of 9
Z z U)
w Ew ;�N w :� w
0F-
81'
2 B11:ILI
W w uj .1
u
-LjQzQOw LLJ
m C.4 W,LM
it -Z<
0 = ro 0
O
w>
0
z 0 0
0 0
C)
0
x L
i 9L
SSSSSbrl
fit
all
tg
is
R11i
pp
-j
(n
34M thow,
so
KljY
Gc jig
SI ---
I
N
51
College Station, TX College
S Texas Ave
College Station,TX 77840
CITY OE COLLEGE STATION
f
H...r nA&M Giro Vrs
Legislation Details (With Text)
File#: 14-470 Version: 1 Name: Traditions Montessori School Rezoning
Type: Rezoning Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 5/21/2014 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission Regular
On agenda: 6/5/2014 Final action:
Title: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an amendment to Chapter 12,
"Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of
the City of College Station, Texas, by change the zoning district boundaries from R Rural to GS
General Suburban for approximately 3 acres for the property Robertson Stevenson Survey Abstract
No. 54 as described in Volume 8070, Page 226 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County,
Texas, and more generally located at 2668 Barron Road. Case#14-00900113 (J. Paz) (Note: Final
action on this item is scheduled for the June 12, 2014 City Council meeting -subject to change)
Sponsors:
Indexes:
Code sections:
Attachments: Aerial &SAM.pdf
Background Information.pdf
Application.pdf
Rezoning Map.pdf
Date Ver. Action By Action Result
Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an amendment to Chapter 12, "Unified
Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of
College Station, Texas, by change the zoning district boundaries from R Rural to GS General Suburban for
approximately 3 acres for the property Robertson Stevenson Survey Abstract No. 54 as described in Volume
8070, Page 226 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas, and more generally located at 2668
Barron Road. Case#14-00900113 (J. Paz) (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the June 12,
2014 City Council meeting - subject to change)
Relationship to Strategic Goals:
• Diverse Growing Economy
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning based on its compatibility with the Comprehensive
Plan Future Land Use and Character Map.
Summary: This request is to rezone the property from R Rural to GS General Suburban. The rezoning would allow for a
portion of the tract to be subdivided off and included as part of a proposed single-family subdivision.
The Unified Development Ordinance provides the following review criteria for zoning map amendments:
REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject property is designated as General Suburban on the
Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map. The proposed rezoning is consistent with this
designation.
College Station,TX Page 1 of 2 Printed on 5/30/2014
powered by LegistarTM
File #: 14-470, Version: 1
2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of
the neighborhood: The proposed rezoning would allow for the subdivision of the property and the development of
single-family residential, which is intended for areas designated General Suburban in the Comprehensive Plan. The
current zoning does not allow for further subdivision of this tract as lots must be a minimum of 3 acres. The adjacent
tract to the west and north are zoned GS General Suburban and are being Preliminary Planned as the Barron Crest
Subdivision. A portion of this tract is proposed to be subdivided and incorporated into Barron Crest Subdivision.
Adjacent properties to the north, east and west are also designated General Suburban on the Comprehensive Plan.
3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district that would be
made applicable by the proposed amendment: The proposed rezoning for uses permitted by the district is
appropriate for this area given the character of the surrounding properties and compliance with the Comprehensive
Plan. The property would be allowed to subdivide into smaller lots.
4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the
property at the time of the proposed amendment: The current R Rural zoning would not allow for further
subdivision or the proposed Barron Crest Subdivision to incorporate a portion of this tract. The proposed zoning
would enable further subdivision and be in keeping with the vision of the Comprehensive Plan.
5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to
the property at the time of the proposed amendment: Under the current zoning district, the property is limited in
density. The proposed zoning would allow for a portion of the tract to be incorporated into the proposed Barron Crest
Subdivision.
6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and
adequate for the proposed use: The subject tract is located in College Station's water and sanitary sewer service
areas. Currently, the property has access to water and sanitary sewer. The tract has frontage to Barron Road, which
is a four-lane Minor Arterial on the City's Thoroughfare Plan. Any future development of the tract will be required to
meet the City's minimum fire flow requirements.
Budget& Financial Summary: N/A
Reviewed and Approved by Legal: N/A
Attachments:
1. Aerial &Small Area Map (SAM)
2. Background Information
3. Application
4. Rezoning Map
College Station,TX Page 2 of 2 Printed on 5/30/2014
powered by LegistarTM
{c
�°' f F•1 A y} Y
y F
Ira S
y per.. a a .. � � �•_ •
m S
C
� a + � I
p• M
Flo • a p L° to] o n
rd p c
�- W a' gvro�cea
w
8 O `S+�
40C a O C 0 7
'\ W sir S1MtR w a.a p� B t -,
Em mt 0
v o v c {5 0
�' p ffimcaF � a �� 2
6LI� a m' J it`�aa cn 0
Q 0
_a
m�Zci �csiraCr
W Z
cry
Z co
eyN�'� ..• ` E ILL m 0 N
mr - � m n
m }
o CL
00
C �
zx �0En Um
n
f� i •1 N dp f r cIL
C'�� TM2o ( %] W
an Cr qyLLI
W
Q Y '"•t G Grp
s' W
V W
p \p A W
v
� 1.} .M r' ,� •� � n-II q �I � pry N '
b
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: June 5, 2014
Advertised Council Hearing Date: June 12, 2014
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station's
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
Edelweiss Gartens HOA
Sonoma HOA
Property owner notices mailed: 14
Contacts in support: None at the time of the report.
Contacts in opposition: None at the time of the report.
Inquiry contacts: None at the time of the report.
ADJACENT LAND USES
Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use
North General Suburban GS General Suburban Single-family residential —
Future Barron Crest
subdivision (unplatted)
South General Suburban GS General Suburban Single-family residential —
(across & Rural Sonoma Subdivision;
Barron School — College Station
Road) High School
East General Suburban R Rural Single-family residential
(unplatted)
West General Suburban GS General Suburban Single-family residential —
Future Barron Crest
Subdivision (unplatted)
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: June 1995
Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open upon annexation
A-O Agricultural Open renamed to R Rural (2013)
Final Plat: The property is currently unplatted.
Site development: Single-family home being converted into private school (Traditions
Montessori School)
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO.: }}
_ DATE SUBMITTED: ��l1
CITY OF COUEGE STATION TIME: 9 •so
Home ofTexasA6MUnivehy' STAFF: KT
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING) APPLICATION
GENERAL
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
❑X $1,165 Rezoning Application Fee.
❑X Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used
and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
Fx] Traffic Impact Analysis or calculations of projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA is not necessary for
the proposed request.
0 One (1) copy of a fully dimensioned map on 24"x 36" paper showing:
a. Land affected;
b. Legal description of area of proposed change;
C. Present zoning;
d. Zoning classification of all abutting land; and
e. All public and private rights-of-way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land.
Fx-] Written legal description of subject property (metes & bounds or lot & block of subdivision, whichever is
applicable).4 66151 rYIpe#> PP►ftPry � ►�i�l� I l6Je*,,m 4v6.)
❑X A CAD (dxf/dwg)-model space State Plane NAD 83 or GIS (shp) digital file (e-mailed to
P&DS_Digital_Submittal@cstx.gov).
NOTE: If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shall not be filed
within a period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with permission of the Planning &Zoning Commission.
Date of Optional Preapplication Conference
NAME OF PROJECT Traditions Montessorri School Rezoning
ADDRESS 2668 Barron Road
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision) Lot 1, Block 1 Traditions Montessorri School Subdivision
GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPERTY, IF NOT PLATTED:
TOTAL ACREAGE 2.92
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name Diana Bethke & Sheila Keelan E-mail traditionsmontessorri@gmail.co
Street Address 2911 Texas Ave, Ste 201
City College station State Tx Zip Code 77845
Phone Number 979-693-8500 Fax Number
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name Same as applicant E-mail
Street Address
City State Zip Code
Phone Number Fax Number
10/10 Page 1 of 3
OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact, i.e. project manager, potential buyer, local contact, etc.):
Name Jeff Robertson(McClure &Browne) E-mail leffr@mcclurebrowne.com
Street Address 1008 Woodcreek
City College Station State TX Zip Code 77845
Phone Number 979-693-3838 Fax Number
This property was conveyed to owner by deed dated 5/31/2013 and recorded in Volume 11384 Page 281
of the Brazos County Official Records.
Existing Zoning Rural Proposed Zoning General Suburban
Present Use of Property Single House
Proposed Use of Property School
REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION
1. List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary.
In order to develop the rear 25'of the property as proposed, the property must be rezoned to General Suburban per
the UDO.
2. Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the
Plan is incorrect.
It is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan.
3_ How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with
the character of the neighborhood?
The zoning will match the surrounding properties to the north and west. The property to the east will likely have to
be rezoned to General Suburban if it is developed in the future.
10/10 Page 2 of 3
4. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested.
The land is suitable for a school and single family houses as proposed.
5. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
The current zoning(rural)is very limited in the uses that are allowed. The single family homes proposed would not
be allowed.
6. Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
The land not highly marketable as a rural zoned property. Most uses allowed in rural are not conducive to
properties located such as this one_
7. List any other reasons to support this zone change.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,
correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more
than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf.
� -
Signature and title Date
10/10 I Print Form Page 3 of 3
4. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested
5. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
6. Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
7. List any other reasons to support this zone change.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,
correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more
than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf.
1
L 44 -��
Signatur d tit a Date
10/10 print Form Page 3 of 3
Ij
I .
I �
� I
,—=—M MOON
h
Amy gg ala
`off 4� e
N
,gps�—3.fdf fli S
1wa3
1
I
College Station, TX College
S Texas Ave
College Station,TX 77840
CITY OE COLLEGE STATION
f
H...r nA&M Giro Vrs
Legislation Details (With Text)
File#: 14-512 Version: 1 Name: AT&T Lake Placid CUP
Type: Rezoning Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 5/29/2014 In control: Planning and Zoning Commission Regular
On agenda: 6/5/2014 Final action:
Title: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance approving a
conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-3.16
"Development Review Procedures, Conditional Use Permit", of the Code of Ordinances of the City of
College Station, Texas, to permit a Major Wireless Telecommunication Facility (WTF) in R Rural
zoning within a 26.25-acre tract generally located at 1241 Flying Ace Circle along Rock Prairie Road.
Case#14-00900030 (J. Paz) (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the June 26, 2014 City
Council meeting - subject to change)
Sponsors: Jenifer Paz
Indexes:
Code sections:
Attachments: SAM&Aerial
Application
Site Plan
Visual Impact Analysis
Date Ver. Action By Action Result
Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance approving a conditional
use permit pursuant to Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-3.16 "Development Review
Procedures, Conditional Use Permit", of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, to
permit a Major Wireless Telecommunication Facility (WTF) in R Rural zoning within a 26.25-acre tract
generally located at 1241 Flying Ace Circle along Rock Prairie Road. Case#14-00900030 (J. Paz) (Note:
Final action on this item is scheduled for the June 26, 2014 City Council meeting - subject to change)
Relationship to Strategic Initiatives: Diverse Growing Economy
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the request.
Summary: The purpose of the conditional use permit application is to facilitate the construction of a 100-foot
major telecommunication tower. The tower is proposed to locate on the 26.25 acre Flying Ace development
tract, located northeast of the intersection of Bird Pond Road and Rock Prairie Road. The transmission tower
is proposed to occupying 4,225 square feet on the northeast corner of the tract. This site was initially
developed prior to annexation in November 2002. This site is zoned R Rural and is not platted. No
development activity has occurred recently on the property.
REVIEW CRITERIA
Section 12-3.16 of the Unified Development Ordinance authorizes City Council the discretionary approval
of uses with unique or widely-varying operating characteristics or unusual site development features,
subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the UDO. The City Council may approve an application for
a conditional use where it reasonably determines that there will be no significant negative impact upon
residents of surrounding property or upon the general public. The City Council shall consider the following
College Station,TX Page 1 of 3 Printed on 5/30/2014
powered by LegistarTM
File #: 14-512, Version: 1
criteria in its review:
1. Purpose and Intent of UDO. The proposed use shall meet the purpose and intent of this UDO and the
use shall meet all the minimum standards established in this UDO for this type of use.
The proposed WTF tower meets all the minimum standards established in the UDO. This section of Rock
Prairie Road is a two-lane Major Collector. As the proposed Wireless Telecommunication Facility(WTF)
tower is considered a Major WTF, it is to be setback the height of the tower by a factor of three from all
thoroughfares; in this case the required setback is 300 feet. The proposed transmission tower is setback
over 1,000 feet from both Bird Pond Road and Rock Prairie Road. Additionally, transmission towers over
75 feet in height must be separated from any existing tower by at least 3,500 feet. The nearest tower is
2.32 miles from the proposed tower. It will also be placed equal distance to the height of the tower away
from surrounding residential structures. Landscaping and a wood fence are proposed to screen the
mechanical equipment at the base of the tower.
2. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan. The proposed use shall be consistent with the development
policies and goals and objectives as embodied in the Comprehensive Plan for development of the City.
The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map designates this area as Estate, which is
intended for low density single-family on minimum one acre lots. Currently, the property is zoned R Rural,
which allows the development of a WTF with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The transmission
tower is proposed to locate at the northeast corner of the tract in an area with minimal development.
3. Compatibility with Surrounding Area. The proposed use shall not be detrimental to the health,
welfare, or safety of the surrounding neighborhood or its occupants, nor be substantially or permanently
injurious to neighboring property.
The proposed telecommunication facility is at least equal the height of the tower(100 feet) from all existing
residential structures. The facility is expected to improve the service coverage for AT&T users in the
surrounding area.
4. Harmonious with Character of Surrounding Area. The proposed site plan and circulation plan shall
be harmonious with the character of the surrounding area.
The proposed lease area for the telecommunication facility is 65 feet by 65 feet located in the northeast
portion of the tract and is primarily used for agricultural purposes. Bird Pond Estates, an acreage rural
residential subdivision, is located by the proposed location.
5. Infrastructure Impacts Minimized. The proposed use shall not negatively impact existing uses in the
area or in the City through impacts on public infrastructure such as roads, parking facilities, electrical, or
water and sewer systems, or on public services such as police and fire protection, solid waste collection, or
the ability of existing infrastructure and services to adequately provide services.
The subject area is outside of the College Station utilities; water, sanitary sewer and electric service areas.
The owner has granted AT&T a private access easement from Rock Prairie Road to access the
telecommunication facility.
6. Effect on Environment. The proposed use shall not negatively impact existing uses in the area or in
the City.
If the proposed telecommunication facility is approved, no other facility will be permitted in close proximity.
The proposed facility will allow for collocation abilities. The surrounding areas are of low density
College Station,TX Page 2 of 3 Printed on 5/30/2014
powered by LegistarTM
File #: 14-512, Version: 1
development. The proposed tower is meeting all standards for Major VVTFs as required by the UDO based
on current conditions.
Commission Action Options: The Commission is tasked with reviewing the conditional use application
based on the criteria listed above and recommend to the City Council such action as the Planning and Zoning
Commission deems proper. The final consideration for the Conditional Use Permit request will be by City
Council at their June 26, 2014 regular meeting.
INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES
Water: The subject area is outside of the College Station Water CCN.
Sewer: The subject area is outside of the College Station Wastewater CCN.
Streets: Rock Prairie Road is a Two-Lane Major Collector on the Thoroughfare Plan
Off-site Easements: None for this improvement.
Drainage: None for this improvement.
Flood Plain: This site is not within a floodplain.
Oversize request: None.
Impact Fees: None.
Notification:
Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle; May 19, 2014
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: June 5, 2014
Advertised Council Hearing Date: June 26, 2014
Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': 5
Response Received: One inquiry at the time of this report.
Supporting Materials:
1. Small Area Map (SAM) and Aerial Map
2. Application
3. Copy of Site Plan
4. Visual Impact Analysis Images
College Station,TX Page 3 of 3 Printed on 5/30/2014
powered by LegistarTM