The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01/02/2014 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning Commission C-4q *-A- 44r� CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home of Texas A&M University Planning & Zoning Commission January 2, 2014 City Hall Council Chambers 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas Workshop Meeting 6:30 PM Regular Meeting 7 :00 PM (*Or"" AGENDA CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home ofTexatAd-M University PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MEETING JANUARY 2,20149 AT 6:30 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 1. Call the meeting to order. 2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. 3. Discussion of Minor and Amending Plats approved by Staff. • Final Plat — Amending — Graham Corner Plaza Block 1 Lots 6R-2A — 4042 State Highway 6 South Case# 13-00900256 (T.Rogers) • Final Plat — Minor — Southland Addition Block 1 Lots 9R & IOR — 109 Southland Street Case# 13-00900210 (M.Hester) 4. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. [New Development List] 5. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the status of items within the 2013 P&Z Plan of Work(see attached). (J.Schubert) 6. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an update on the following items: • An ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan — Future Land Use & Character Map from Suburban Commercial and Natural Areas-Reserved to General Commercial and Natural Areas-Reserved for approximately 11.4 acres for the property located at 2560 Earl Rudder Freeway South at the corner of Earl Rudder Freeway South and Harvey Mitchell Parkway. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on November 21 and voted (4-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on December 12 and voted (7-0) to approve the item. • An ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12- 3.4, "Plat Review," and Section 12-3.18, "Administrative Adjustments," regarding title reports, tax certificates, and administrative adjustments. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on December 5 and voted (5-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on December 12 and voted (7-0) to approve the item. 2 7. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings. • Thursday, January 9, 2014 — City Council Meeting — Council Chambers — Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. (Liaison—Rektorik) • Thursday, January 16, 2014 — P&Z Meeting — Council Chambers — Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. 8. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, Joint Parks / Planning & Zoning Subcommittee, BioCorridor Board, BioCorridor Plan Process, 5-Year Comprehensive Plan Review Subcommittee, and Zoning District Subcommittee. 9. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 10. Adjourn. 3 AGENDA CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Howe of Texas A&M University' REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 2,20149 AT 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 1. Call meeting to order. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Hear Citizens. At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address the Commission on planning and zoning issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The citizen presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.) All matters listed under Item 4, Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Planning & Zoning Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. There will not be separate discussion of these items. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it will be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration. 4. Consent Agenda 4.1 Consideration, possible action, and discussion on Absence Requests from meetings. • Jim Ross—January 2, 2014 4.2 Consideration,possible action, and discussion to approve Meeting Minutes. • December 5, 2013 —Workshop • December 5, 2013 —Regular Regular Agenda 5. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. 4 6. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a request to seek reapplication of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Future Land Use & Character Map within 180 days of the denial of a previous request for approximately 5.4 acres for the property located at 1201 Norton Lane at the corner of Wellborn Road and Norton Lane. Case#13-00900259 (M.Hester) 7. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a waiver request to Unified Development Ordinance Section 8.3.H.2 "Platting and Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions", and a public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for McCulloch's Subdivision Lots 12R, 13R, & 14R, Block 3 being a replat of McCulloch's Subdivision Lots 12, 13, 14, & 15, Block 3 on approximately 0.45 acres located at 1117 Phoenix Street. Case #13-00900214 (M.Hester) 8. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an amendment to Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 4.2, "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by rezoning approximately 294 acres of R-1 B Single-Family Residential and R Rural to RS Restricted Suburban in the area of the Great Oaks Subdivision, generally bounded by the existing Great Oaks Subdivision to the west, Rock Prairie Road West to the south, Quail Run Subdivision to the north, and Holleman Drive South to the east. Case#13-00900246 (M.Hester) (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the January 23,2014 City Council Meeting - subject to change) 9. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan — Future Land Use & Character Map from Suburban Commercial, Urban, and Natural Areas Reserved to Urban and Natural Areas Reserved for the property located at 2021 Harvey Mitchell Parkway South, generally located at the intersection of Rio Grande Boulevard and Harvey Mitchell Parkway. Case #13- 00900247 (M.Hester) (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the January 23,2014 City Council Meeting -subject to change) 10. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 11. Adjourn. 5 (*01"" CITY OF COLLEGE,STATION Planning ear Development Services Absence Request Form For Elected and Appointed Officers Name Jim Ross Request Submitted on 12/9/2013 I will not be in attendance at the meeting on 1/2/2014 for the reason specified: (Date) Out of Town Signature Jim Ross 6 MINUTES CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Home of Tmo AdM Univrniiy' Workshop Meeting December 5, 2013, 6:00 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Mike Ashfield, Jim Ross,Bo Miles, and Brad Corrier COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Jerome Rektorik and Jodi Warner CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: John Nichols CITY STAFF PRESENT: Bob Cowell, Lance Simms, Molly Hitchcock, Jennifer Prochazka, Jason Schubert, Teresa Rogers, Morgan Hester, Jenifer Paz, Danielle Singh, Alan Gibbs, David Schmitz, Debbie Eller, David Brower, Charles Michalewicz, Brian Piscacek, Betty Vermeire, Brittany Caldwell, and Timothy Green 1. Call the meeting to order. Chairman Ashfield called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding Regular Agenda Item 7. 3. Discussion of Minor and Amending Plats approved by Staff. • Final Plat — Minor — West Park Block 9 Lots 9R & 10 — 206 Grove Street Case # 13- 00900192 (M.Hester) • Final Plat — Amending — Caprock Crossing Block 1 Lots 2-3, Block 2 Lot 1, Block 3 Lot 1 —950 William D. Fitch Parkway Case# 13-00900216 (M.Robinson) • Final Plat — Minor — Tower Point Phase 3 Block 3 Lot 28AR — 943 William D. Fitch Parkway Case# 13-00900227 (J.Paz) • Final Plat—Amending— Plazas at Rock Prairie Phase 3 —3975 State Highway 6 South Case# 13-00900180 (T.Rogers) • Final Plat — Minor — Saddlecreek Phase 3 Block 6 Lot 128R Case # 13-00900225 (M.Hester) There was no discussion regarding minor and amending plats. 4. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. [New Development List] December 5,2013 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 3 7 There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding new development activity in the City. 5. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the status of items within the 2013 P&Z Plan of Work(see attached). (J.Schubert) There was no discussion regarding the 2013 P&Z Plan of Work. 6. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an update on the following items: • An ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan—Future Land Use & Character Map from Estate to General Commercial for approximately 5.4 acres for the property located at 1201 Norton Lane at the corner of Wellborn Road and Norton Lane. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on October 17 and voted 3-1 to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on November 14 and a motion to approve the request failed by a vote of 3-4. • An ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan—Future Land Use & Character Map from Institutional/Public to General Commercial for approximately 4.4 acres for the property located at 1600 University Drive East at the corner of University Drive East and Glenhaven Drive. The Planning& Zoning Commission heard this item on October 17 and voted 4-0 to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on November 14 and voted 7-0 to approve the request. • A rezoning of approximately 7.4 acres located at 2900 North Graham Road from PDD (Planned Development District) to BPI (Business Park Industrial). The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on October 17 and voted 4-0 to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on November 14 and voted 7-0 to approve the request. • An ordinance amending and updating the water and wastewater impact fees and associated land use assumptions and capital improvements plan. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on September 19 and voted 6-0 to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on November 14 and voted 7-0 to approve the item. • A rezoning of approximately 4.4 acres located at 1600 University Drive East from O (Office) to GC (General Commercial). The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on October 17 and voted (4-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on November 26 and voted (7-0) to approve the item. There was no discussion regarding the above-mentioned items heard by City Council. 7. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the Phase 1: Existing Conditions Report of the City of College Station Community Development Master Plan. (D.Brower/B.Piscacek) Executive Director Cowell introduced the item. December 5,2013 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3 8 Community Development Analysts Piscacek and Brower gave a presentation regarding the Phase 1 of the Community Development Master Plan. 8. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings. • Thursday, December 12, 2013 — City Council Meeting — Council Chambers — Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. (Liaison— Corrier) • Thursday, December 19, 2013 — P&Z Meeting — Council Chambers —Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. Chairman Ashfield reviewed the upcoming meeting dates with the Planning and Zoning Commission. Executive Director Cowell stated that the December 19th Planning & Zoning meeting was tentatively cancelled. 9. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, Joint Parks / Planning & Zoning Subcommittee, BioCorridor Board, BioCorridor Plan Process, 5-Year Comprehensive Plan Review Subcommittee, and Zoning District Subcommittee. There was general discussion amongst the Commission and Staff regarding upcoming meetings. 10. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. There was no discussion regarding future agenda items. 11. Adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 6:41 p.m. Approved: Attest: Mike Ashfield, Chairman Brittany Caldwell,Admin. Support Specialist Planning&Zoning Commission Planning&Development Services December 5,2013 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3 9 (*OF"" CITY OF COLLEGE STATION MINUTES Home of Tffz A&M UniversiV* PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting December 5, 2013, 7:00 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Mike Ashfield, Jodi Warner, Jim Ross, Bo Miles, and Brad Corrier COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Jerome Rekotrik CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: John Nichols and Steve Aldrick CITY STAFF PRESENT: Bob Cowell, Lance Simms, Molly Hitchcock, Jennifer Prochazka, Jason Schubert, Teresa Rogers, Morgan Hester, Jenifer Paz, Danielle Singh, Alan Gibbs, Brittany Caldwell, and Timothy Green 1. Call Meeting to Order Chairman Ashfield called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Hear Citizens No citizens spoke. 4. Consent Agenda All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. 4.1 Consideration, possible action, and discussion on Absence Requests from meetings. • Jerome Rektorik—December 5, 2013 4.2 Consideration,possible action, and discussion to approve Meeting Minutes. • November 19, 2013 —Joint Workshop with City of Bryan P&Z • November 21, 2013 —Workshop • November 21, 2013 —Regular Commissioner Miles motioned to approve Consent Agenda Items 4.1 and 4.2. Commissioner Warner seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). December 5,2013 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 4 10 Regular Agenda 5. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. No items were removed from the Consent Agenda. 6. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for the Memorial Cemetery of College Station Section M2A and M2X being a replat of Memorial Cemetery of College Station Section 2 on approximately 32.5 acres located at 3800 Raymond Stotzer Parkway, generally located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Raymond Stotzer Parkway and Harvey Mitchell Parkway South. Case #13-00900233 (M.Hester) Staff Planner Hester presented the replat and recommended approval. Chairman Ashfield opened the public hearing. No one spoke during the public hearing. Chairman Ashfield closed the public hearing. Commissioner Ross motioned to approve the replat. Commissioner Miles seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). 7. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan — Future Land Use & Character Map from Estate to General Commercial for the property located at 13913 FM 2154; approximately 1.3 acres generally located north of the intersection of Norton Lane and Wellborn Road. Case #13-00900228 (M.Hester) (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the January 9,2014 City Council Meeting - subject to change) Staff Planner Hester presented the staff report and stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council are requested to make a policy decision. At least three options for action are available as noted below: • Accept the applicant's proposal of amending the Comprehensive Plan to General Commercial and Natural Areas-Reserved designation; • Deny the applicant's proposal and maintain Suburban Commercial and Natural Areas-Reserved designation on the Comprehensive Plan; • Propose an alternative land use and character designation for this property. Glenn Jones, J4 Engineering, stated that he was available for questions. Jane Cohen, 3655 McCullough Road, College Station, Texas; Carol Fontaine, 14380 Cheyenne Drive, College Station, Texas; Fiona Trizard, 3180 Barron Road, College December 5,2013 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 4 11 Station, Texas; Linda Hale, 4042 Cody Drive, College Station, Texas. The citizens spoke in opposition of the request and stated that the neighborhood integrity needed to be respected. Dr. Baines, 902 Wingfoot, College Station, Texas, spoke in favor of the request. Mr. Jones stated that additional right-of-way had been taken and utilities had been removed and expanded to accommodate the widening. He said that the intended use for the property is a church. Chairman Ashfield closed the public hearing. There was general discussion amongst Commission regarding the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Commissioner Corrier motioned to recommend denial of the request. Commissioner Warner seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). 8. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-7.5, "Signs," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas regarding sign regulations for Places of Worship. Case #13-00900229 (T.Rogers) (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the January 9,2014 City Council Meeting - subject to change) Staff Planner Rogers presented the ordinance amendment regarding sign regulations for Places of Worship. There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding the ordinance amendment. Chairman Ashfield opened the public hearing. Sherry Ellison, 2705 Brookway Drive, College Station, Texas, expressed concern about the signs affecting the neighborhoods. Natalie Ruiz, 511 University Drive East, College Station, Texas, spoke in support of the ordinance amendment. Chairman Ashfield closed the public hearing. Commissioner Warner motioned to recommend approval of the ordinance amendment. Commissioner Corrier seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). 9. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-3.4, "Plat Review," December 5,2013 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 4 12 and Section 12-3.18, "Administrative Adjustment," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas regarding title reports, tax certificates, and administrative adjustments. Case #13-00900236 (J.Schubert) (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the December 12,2013 City Council Meeting - subject to change) Principal Planner Schubert presented the ordinance amendment regarding title reports, tax certificates, and administrative adjustments. There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding the amendment and the process for Nothing Further Certificates. Chairman Ashfield opened the public hearing. Veronica Morgan, 511 University Drive East, College Station, Texas spoke in favor of the ordinance amendment and also expressed concern regarding the process for Nothing Further Certificates. Chairman Ashfield closed the public hearing. Commissioner Ross motioned to recommend approval of the ordinance amendment. Commissioner Miles seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). 10. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. There was no discussion regarding future agenda items. 11. Adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 8:05 p.m. Approved: Attest: Mike Ashfield,Chairman Brittany Caldwell,Admin. Support Specialist Planning&Zoning Commission Planning&Development Services December 5,2013 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 4 13 (*400r� CITY OF COIJ FGF~STATION Nome of Texas A&M University' MEMORANDUM DATE: January 2, 2014 TO: Members of the Planning &Zoning Commission FROM: Morgan Hester, Staff Planner SUBJECT: Request to Reapply for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for 1201 Norton Lane Item: Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a request to seek reapplication of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Future Land Use & Character Map within 180 days of the denial of a previous request for approximately 5.4 acres for the property located at 1201 Norton Lane at the corner of Wellborn Road and Norton Lane. Case#13-00900259(M. Hester) Background: On November 14, 2013, City Council denied a Comprehensive Plan Amendment request for the property located at 1201 Norton Lane and owned by Brazos Valley Church of Christ. The request proposed to amend the Future Land Use & Character Map from Estate to General Commercial. Unified Development Ordinance Section 12-3.22.E "Limitation on Reapplication" states that "if a petition for a plan amendment is denied by the City Council, another petition for reclassification of the same property or any portion thereof shall not be considered within a period of one hundred eighty (180) days from the date of denial, unless the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that one (1) of the following factors are applicable: 1. There is a substantial change in circumstances relevant to the issues and/or facts considered during review of the application that might reasonably affect the decision-making body's application of the relevant review standards to the development proposed in the application; or 2. New or additional information is available that was not available at the time of the review that might reasonably affect the decision-making body's application of the relevant review standards to the development proposed; or 3. A new application is proposed to be submitted that is materially different from the prior application (e.g., proposes new uses or a substantial decrease in proposed densities or intensities); or 4. The final decision on the application was based on a material mistake of fact." As provided in the attached letter, the applicant is seeking the consent of the Commission to reapply for a different designation, Suburban Commercial. If consent is provided, the applicant will submit a new application for future consideration. If denied, the applicant can reapply after the 180-day period ends. Attachment: 1. Request Letter from Brazos Valley Church of Christ Planning&Development Services P.O.BOX 9960 • 1101 TEXAS AVENUE-COLLEGE STATION •TEXAS •77842 TEL.979.764.3570 •FAX. 979.764.3496 cstK.gov/d4veservices December 5,2013 Jason Schubert Principal Planner City of College Station P.O.Box 9960 College Station,Texas 77842 Re.: Brazos Vally Church of Christ Comprehensive Plan Amendment COCS No. 13-00900259 Dear Mr. Schubert: In accordance with the Unified Developmetn Ordiance(UDO) Section 12-3.22.E.,a comprehensive plan amendment may not be requested within 180 days of a denial of the City Council of a comprehensive plan amendment request for a subject property. However,Section 12-3.22.E.states that the Planning and Zoning(P&Z)Commission may wave this requirement if one of the four following factors are applicable: 1. There is a substantial change in circumstances relevant to the issues and/or facts considered during review of the application that might reasonably affect the decision-making body's application of the relevant review.standards to the development proposed in the application;or 2. New or additional information is available that was not available at the time of the review that might reasonably affect the decision-making body's application of the relevant review standards to the development proposed;or 3. A new application is proposed to be submitted that is materially different from the prior application (e.g.,proposes new uses or a substantial decrease in proposed densities or intensities);or 4. The final decision on the application was based on a material mistake of fact. Based on comments and additional information recieved during the recent City Council meeting,we believe that the subject property would be more suited for a suburban commercial zoning and would like to resubmit a new comprehensive plan amendment application as soon as possible. In accordance with Section 12-3.22.E.2(new/additional information)and E.3 (proposed new use),we believe the P&Z Commission has the authority to allow the property owner to request a comprehensive plan amendment within 180 days of the City Council denial of the last request. Therefore,we respectfully request the P&Z Commission's approval to allow the submission of a new/different comprehensive plan amendment application within the 180-day City Council denial period, Thank you for your consideration and we look forward to your decission. Respectfully, Ray Bomnskie Brazos Vally Church of Christ 15 Z00/Z00 'd 617L HS E6Wfl 0111M8 �311JL X1 77 :01 H07, 01 it (i *Ar� CITY OF COLLEGE STATION FINAL PLAT for McCulloch's Subdivision Lots 12R,13R &14R, Block 3 Being a Replat of McCulloch's Subdivision Lots 12, 13, 14, & 15, Block 3 13-00900214 SCALE: Three lots on approximately 0.45 acres LOCATION: 1117 Phoenix Street ZONING: GS General Suburban APPLICANT: Marco Maina, Habitat for Humanity PROJECT MANAGER: Morgan Hester, Staff Planner mhester@cstx.gov PROJECT OVERVIEW: The proposed Final Plat re-plats one GS General Suburban building plot into three GS General Suburban lots. This property is located in an area designated at Neighborhood Conservation on the Comprehensive Plan and must comply with the regulations set in UDO Section 8.3.1-1.2. Due to the deficit in the minimum lot sizes and widths of the proposed lots, waivers are being requested through the Planning & Zoning Commission. RECOMMENDATION: If the waiver requests are approved, Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat. If the waiver requests are denied, the Final Plat must be denied. Planning &Zoning Commission Page 1 of 5 January 2, 2014 16 EL v 6� ` 1 � r v e f co ��• U 1Q, LU LUn W nil AO _LJ LLJ LU LU 'z v \ LLJ Planning &Zoning Commission Page 2 of 5 January 2, 2014 17 DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: March 1956 Zoning: R-1 Single-Family, renamed GS General Suburban in 2013 Preliminary Plat: The subject tract is considered a building plot according to Section 8.3.H.2. `Platting and Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions' of the Unified Development Ordinance. The original Final Plat for this property is from 1946. Site Development: Vacant COMMENTS Parkland Dedication: Dedication will be assessed on two newly-established single- family lots for a total of$2,522. Greenways: No dedication is proposed or required with this plat. Pedestrian Connectivity: A 5-foot sidewalk is required with this development and is being provided. Bicycle Connectivity: No dedication is proposed or required with this plat. Impact Fees: N/A REVIEW CRITERIA Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: For properties designated as Neighborhood Conservation on the Comprehensive Future Land Use and Character Map, Section 8.3.H.2 `Platting and Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions' of the Unified Development Ordinance states that a plat involving a building plot created prior to June 1970, which creates an additional lot or building plot, must meet or exceed the average lot width within the block and each lot must be at least 8,500 square feet in area. The proposed Final Plat requires waivers to Section 8.3.H.2 `Platting and Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions' of the Unified Development Ordinance, regarding lot with requirements and lot size requirements for platting in older subdivisions. The average lot width within the subject block, bounded by Holleman Drive, Phoenix Street, Alabama Street, and Carolina Street, is approximately 85.5 linear feet. The three lots being created require the following waivers: Lot Number Proposed Lot Width Waiver Requested Lot 12R 66.67 square feet 18.83 square feet Lot 13R 66.67 square feet 18.83 square feet Lot 14R 66.66 square feet 18.84 square feet Planning &Zoning Commission Page 3 of 5 January 2, 2014 18 The three lots being created require the following waivers to the 8,500 square foot lot size: Lot Number Proposed Lot Size Waiver Requested Lot 12R 6,667 square feet 1,833 square feet Lot 13R 6,667 square feet 1,833 square feet Lot 14R 6,667 square feet 1,833 square feet The subject property is within the Southside Area Neighborhood Plan boundary adopted in 2012. During the Neighborhood Plan process, area neighborhood residents and property owners worked together to develop recommendations for land use. The residents and property owners in the McCulloch Subdivision also expressed their desire to see the pattern of development remain primarily as it is today with varying building plot sizes. Prior to the adoption of the Southside Area Neighborhood Plan, this area was designated as General Suburban and Urban on the Comprehensive Future Land Use and Character Map and to help ensure that the character remains compatible with the existing single-family homes in the area, a change was initiated. Through that effort, the McCulloch Subdivision is currently designated as Neighborhood Conservation on the Comprehensive Plan. In accordance with the Subdivision Regulations, when considering a waiver, the Planning and Zoning Commission should make the following findings to approve the waiver: 1) That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; A special circumstance does not exist for the property due to the Southside Area Neighborhood Plan. 2) That the waivers are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; The building plot currently allows for one structure. The property could be subdivided into two lots without necessitating waivers. Several two lot building plots exist in the block. 3) That the granting of the waivers will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering this chapter; and The granting of the requested waivers will not be detrimental to the public health or safety, or welfare. Granting the waivers will not keep with the recommendation of the Southside Planning &Zoning Commission Page 4 of 5 January 2, 2014 19 Area Neighborhood Plan in maintaining the lot size and width within the McCulloch Subdivision. 4) That the granting of the waivers will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. The granting of the requested waivers will not affect the future orderly subdivision of property in the area. The McCulloch Subdivision was originally platted in 1946 and some of the lots have become commonly owned, which has increased the average lot width. Additionally, the Southside Area Neighborhood Plan has recommended that the properties in this area be restricted by Section 8.3.1-1.2 of the Unified Development Ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION If the waiver requests are approved, Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat. If the waiver requests are denied, the Final Plat must be denied. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Application 2. Copy of Final Plat Planning &Zoning Commission Page 5 of 5 January 2, 2014 20 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASE NO.: DATE SUBMITTED: TIME: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Home of Texas AcW University' STAFF: FINAL PLAT APPLICATION (Check one) ❑ Minor ❑ Amending ❑ Final ❑ Vacating X❑Replat ($700) ($700) ($932) ($932) ($932) Is this plat in the ETJ? ❑ Yes ❑X No Is this plat Commercial ❑ or Residential ❑X MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ❑X $700-$932 Final Plat Application Fee(see above). ❑ $233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable). 0 $600 (minimum) Development Permit Application / Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is 1%of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is> $600, the balance is due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit). Q Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided. ❑X Fourteen (14)folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.) ❑ Two (2) copies of the grading, drainage, and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report. ❑X Two (2) copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable). ❑ Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable). ❑X Title report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate current within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership, liens, encumbrances, etc. ❑ Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. 0 The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. NOTE: A mylar of the approved preliminary plan must be on file before a final plat application will be considered complete. If the mylar is submitted with the final plat application, it shall be considered a submittal for the preliminary plan project and processed and reviewed as such. Until the mylar has been confirmed by staff to be correct, the final plat application will be considered incomplete. Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference August 12, 2013 NAME OF PROJECT Final Plat of Lots 12R, 13R& 14R, Block 3, Mcuculloch's Subdivision ADDRESS 1117 Phoenix Street SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT: FNortheast quadrant of the intersection of Phoenix and Alabama Street APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name Marco Maina, Executive Director E-mail property@habitatbcs.org Street Address 119 Lake Street City Bryan State Texas Zip Code 77801 Phone Number 979-823-7200 Fax Number 979-775-7412 1/11 Page 1 of 9 21 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (All owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple owners): Name B/CS Habitat for Humanity E-mail property@habitatbcs.org Street Address 119 Lake Street City Byran State Texas Zip Code 77801 Phone Number 979-823-7200 Fax Number 979-775-7412 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name Christian A. Galindo, P.E., R.P.L.S. E-mail chris@gepinc.net Street Address 3833 South Texas Ave City Bryan State Texas Zip Code 77802 Phone Number 979-846-8868 Fax Number 979-846-8868 Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property? ❑ Yes ❑X No Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so, please provide the Volume and Page No. Total Acreage 0.4517 Total No. of Lots 3 R-O-W Acreage Existing Use R-1 Proposed Use R-1 Number of Lots By Zoning District 3 / R-1 I / Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: 0.153 / R-1 Floodplain Acreage None Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? r Yes JX No This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made, vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law. Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable? F_ Yes FX_ No If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide additional sheets if necessary): Project Name: City Project Number(if known). Date/Timeframe when submitted: 1/11 Page 2 of 9 22 A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan (if applicable) i Requested waiver to subdivision rec,�ulations and reason four sae(if aap_plicable): Allow rep offing the current 4 lots into 3 t us deviating from atyC" s ouimerit requirements- — Regarding the waiver request, explain how: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. 1e exisling 44 tots are of srrhslan dar s/ze or currenfsvec�i lov pment However their reconfiguration OF Ir_tS or oss would demand the construction of larger homes that would in turn defeat the reason for Habitat's existence.. 2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. BIC-13 Habitat for Humanity, a non-profit organrza ion, exists or tl�e purpose o providing a:l ordable times. Higher value homes would be beyond the reach of Habitat's market and would work against the final users in this market. 3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. 7T[re r strrictrrreneve opment o e proposed times, wit i floe exceptior7 0 arirestic watersr,rpply, aiready exists. An extension of this waterline is part of the project. There will be no other changes to the existing conditions in the area. Habitat homes are single family homes. The prospective buyers are carefully selected and are keenly ware of the value of home ownership and of maintaining a good standing within the community. 4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. FO is is an of er neig r or oo in t e rty. 3epropose replat promotes its continue orde y eve.opsin the ighborhood. An analysis of the replat, according to current requirements, indicates that the tract could be renfigured from 4 lots into 2.3!ots. Due to this fractional excess the proposed number of lots is being rounded off to 3(three). Please see this analysis in the attached Exhibit(2 pages). Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable): 1. An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way; 2. The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the LIDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the purposes and goals of the LIDO or the City's comprehensive Pian; 3. F A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12) months; 4. F Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate/ rural context; 5. I— When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan; 1/11 Page 3 of 9 23 6. F The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO; or 7. F- The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway/Expressway as designated by Map 6.6, Thoroughfare Plan-Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Detailed explanation of condition identified above: NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the same time by the Planning &Zoning Commission. Requested Oversize Participation Total Linear Footage of Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: Proposed Public: ACREAGE: IVO.VE Streets 200 Sidewalks No. of acres to be dedicated + $ , development fee Sanitary Sewer Lines No. of acres in floodplain 241Water Lines _ No. of acres in detention Channels No. of acres in greenways OR Storm Sewers FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: Bike Lanes I Paths No. of SF Dwelling Units X$ _ $ (date)Approved by Parks & Recreation Advisory Board NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. LIEN HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as described above. &,�a4lvc bi'e'(C�ar m ature and title [late 1/11 Page 4 of 9 24 CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT Owner Certification: 1. No work of any kind may start until a permit is issued. 2. The permit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein. 3. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re-issued. 4. Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. 5. The permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance. 6. Other permits may be required to fulfill local, state, and federal requirements. Owner will obtain or show compliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOI and SWPPP. 7. If required, Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre- pour)and post construction. 8. Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify compliance. 9. If, stormwater mitigation is required, including detention ponds proposed as part of this project, it shall be designed and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project. 10. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that all debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities.All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project.All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall apply. 11. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines Technical Specifications, and Standard Details. All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. 12. Release of plans to (name or firm) is authorized for bidding purposes only. I understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on contractor signature on approved Development Permit. 13. I, THE OWNER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION,ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND ACCURATE. Propert Owners) Date Engineer Certification: 1. The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds, proposed as part of the project will be constructed first in the construction sequence. 2. 1 will obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local, State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NOI and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES: i.e., projects over 10 acres may require a sedimentation basin. 3. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified Design Guidelines.All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations. 4. I, THE ENGINEER, AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN, AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION, ARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, AND ACCURATE. "7 i I mCT, /D, 20/3 Engineer- _ � J Date 1/11 Page 5 of 9 25 EXHIBIT o °o �oaoo O0, a4 'JO 0L7. I 1}1 $Q. p Gp 0. 00, C, A ASO �0 00• o o. -per 1po C, 00. 1-10 rocs �o 'to'00. . .00. s 0 Oi. Lf 0� S pQ. ks a.p U. 1po OC7. 00. SUBDIVISION AREA=19,685 S.F. SUBDIVISION LENGTH=200.00 `��• # LOTS ALLOWED: 'j• BY AREA: 2.3 BY WIDTH: 2.3 130 F r 0 O '00. '0a. l�J` N 0 75 `% 00. � o BLOCK 3 ANALYSIS: TOTAL AREA 138,725 S.F. Q TOTAL LENGTH 705 L.F IDENTIFIED TRACTS ON PHOENIX: 8 0 IDENTIFIED TRACTS ON CAROLINA: 8 ooq AVE. LOT AREA: 8,670 S.F. AVE. LOT WIDTH: 88 L.F. 26 y a t Brazos CAD -• Map of Property ID 32270 for Year 2013 .2920 �• `- . 29549 �f2954729J31 7 " 2360 70 29*ri29J4$ 1353 19 T{3 32351 ff 29S5ra 29551 32ZS7 323;34 41.;; 32362 3235,5 47021 { r 322J5 32378- �. 29555: ti � f � 37335 323SE''�� r' `'47022,£# 1' p�, / 29552 32294. 32346 4, 32330 z� j4 32379 , ♦' -3236„ . �? 295' �� 1, 32380 '4702. _ 32298 32307 1337 2 X54 ��29554 r �,. X97449 ' 322$3 ,``� 3219`3323084 /� :236532381^ f 4r 32300 ti 32304 j� 3233F3, �, � f ,. � 31382 10383e 32262' 32272 / 79370 ,323v�iu � f l f �• 32301 32339' .31367.` 'tD32383� -322)3 e : �32314`� ', 132224^ 32255 32-311 3 3d0 Wr2315 8 - t '1 '32 29582 ff t 32213 32266 32274 , 32312 at. 32341 3, '� .,v,, i �e r �,�32' t 323#2 2369 f r f 32222 322,3 `t. 32267 3 2275 '�,,.�'� t •` \29563 \ `32268 32276 fvX3477373i344\ 4 3731332j.15'2343 2370• ,. i ., 31244 32221 32245 32269 Uri 3 i/� �*k'%' a3253237 y 3230 +P. . 1 ' 32277' ' . .�, 3Y2'h33. 73211? s224s 5' 3234' 32203> 248 rxP { 32324 323.737528 f 32 1 1�1 f - "y 32225 `� 32325!* �, Dr37529^S s''% 32274,�3,2278 32315 ' , 32348 r 37512 .375 0 32204 `132126 32249 3 7ti 3 �� 32327-"e 3231 r2Z27 / 32287 32318' f 3 3753.1 I f r X13 :ti'AG s�Sa2.322 oS f 3222 rr y 311 28 f. i .r3,514• f 32106 32 23 0 81G43 32279 32281# 32`° ✓ gat] -3753 /� \ Lot Line, f ; 0 453 7 3 7515 ' ter' / 1038 97 syr, Er' r r � 37534' 32207 32253 r 32290 \\ — streets r ss Feec -3 d 51 J� x 3223.1 31281 , i� 375351 22191`. r 322Q9- ,/ 32732,32254..�� 3221 �eolected PrcauftYl Property Details Account Property ID: 32270 Geo ID: 403500-0003-0120 Type: Real Legal Description: MCCULL OCH {GEORGE), Location BLOCK 3, LOT 12-15 { Situs Address: 1117 PHOENIX ST Neighborhood: C-C#1;CS CENTRAL 1 Mapsco: Owner Jurisdictions: C2, CAD, G1, S2, ZRFND Owner Name: RUSSELL RUTH L ESTATE r Mailing Address: % WATSON SHANTRELL ADMINISTRATOR, 1754 DANIEL CT, FAIRFIELD, CA 94533-4157 Property Appraised Value: $28,000.00 https://propaccess.trueautomation,com/Map/View/Map/65/32270/2013 G PropertyACCES5 :Map Disclaimer:Thi,product is for inf"n'-weal P�,poses on'y and n':ay nu:have been prepared fo'o:be$u-ble for legal,enoineerin,or surveying approximate re�aove location of properz1 boundanIs.Thr.Brazos rou,� 9 yng purposes,]t does no[eoprr:enk Mn pn-9-go.•�rugiLl su v y and iepre:-en`s only the h,Appraisal D;stnct ex Pr essay disclaims any antl all!:aL•ility in cpnnec[ian he re,v�b5. 27 gei N X z NN gggg 4F, Q CQ IT, adillp i4pVski N INHAREM191i 'A'09 NIA 112 a Q as rte o [six Iry I g 1141i (i *Ar� CITY OF COLLEGE STATION REZONING REQUEST For Great Oaks 13-00900246 REQUEST: R1-B Single-Family Residential and R Rural to RS Restricted Suburban SCALE: Approximately 294 acres LOCATION: Great Oaks Subdivision, generally located west of Holleman Drive South and north of Rock Prairie Road West, bounded by the existing Great Oaks Subdivision to the west, Rock Prairie Road West to the South, Quail Run Subdivision to the north, and Holleman Drive South to the east. APPLICANTS: Veronica Morgan, Mitchell & Morgan, LLP PROJECT MANAGER: Morgan Hester, Staff Planner mhester@cstx.gov RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request based on its compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map. Planning &Zoning Commission Page 1 of 6 January 2, 2014 29 W . i q CL °' 3 o ❑ LU k < J PLU 0 S CD o CN CID c� � 4�g 2� W LU LU IL J W W o Planning &Zoning Commission Page 2 of 6 January 2, 2014 30 ¢ pR�C o�c5 W rs SUZPN v _ z i '0 ❑ a== a i a N M a0 axaxo �Y Ju cv ID 0 ' s m41 oMw m 14 m 2 J J=L) d ❑ a�� N= a 0 � ❑ P dQ I I ubc �L z M ux < Q c D 77 a LU QLU J fl � S� a _ CV .2 CID E E �? d iE o " 2 frd �5• � �x�O m� r�m O • I x u L) cpm W_ W LU o � m _ W \ h a LU 4 a� W y��R�°� 6ti� o�a� N N � ❑ r, o ° J�a � w cm7 a Planning&Zoning Commission Page 3 of 6 January 2,2014 31 NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: January 2, 2014 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: January 23, 2014 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station's Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: Great Oaks HOA The Barracks HOA Property owner notices mailed: Sixty-four (64). Contacts in support: None at the time of the report. Contacts in opposition: None at the time of the report. Inquiry contacts: None at the time of the report. ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use Single-Family North (ETJ) Rural N/A - ETJ Residential - Quail Run Estates South Single-Family (Across Rock Prairie Restricted Suburban R Rural Residential, golf Road West) driving range, vacant GS General Urban, Suburban, Vacant, Las Palomas East T Townhouse, General Suburban R-4 Multi-Family, Subdivision R Rural Single-Family West Estate, R Rural E Estate Residential - Great Restricted Suburban Oaks Phases 1 and 1B DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: March 2008 Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open upon annexation R-1 B Single-Family Residential May 2008 (retired 2013) A-O Agricultural Open renamed R Rural (2013) Final Plat: This property is currently unplatted Site development: Vacant REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject property is designated as Restricted Suburban on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map. The proposed rezoning is consistent with this designation. Planning &Zoning Commission Page 4 of 6 January 2, 2014 32 2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood: The proposed rezoning will allow for the development permitted in RS Restricted Suburban, both the zoning district and land use designation. This rezoning would allow for transition in the subdivision pattern found in the existing phases of the Great Oaks Subdivision adjacent to the subject area. Although the development to the north, Quail Run Estates, is located in the Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ), the large lot pattern of the subdivision is similar to that of the existing phases of Great Oaks Subdivision. Smaller lots are planned to be developed within the future phases of Great Oaks which will help transition to small lots in the Las Palomas Subdivision, University Heights, and Barracks II. 3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: Although the current zoning allows for a residential development, RS Restricted Suburban allows more flexibility in the design of the subdivision. This new residential zoning district of RS Restricted Suburban was adopted in 2013 and R-1 B Single-Family Residential was retired. RS Restricted Suburban allows for detached medium-density, single-family residential development and more design options that the current zoning classification. Additionally, through cluster development, the absolute minimum permitted lot size is 6,500 square feet with an average of 10,000 square feet. 4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The current zoning designation of R-1 B Single-Family Residential permits development of lots with a minimum of 8,000 square feet with no minimum lot width or depth. The applicant states that they wish to cluster their development and have lot sizes that are smaller than the minimum permitted lot size in the R-1 B Single-Family Residential zoning district. 5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The applicant states that the existing R-1 B Single-Family Residential zoning classification is not viable for their development. Additionally, they will be permitted to cluster while being sensitive to the environment within the area based on the options included in the recent zoning classification amendment. 6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for the proposed use: The subject tract is located in Wellborn Special Utility District's water service area. Future development of the tract will have to meet the City's minimum fire flow requirements. The subject tract has access to a 12-inch sanitary sewer main which extends to the north east property boundary. A portion of the tract is located in the Steeplechase Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Area. The subject tract is in the Hope's Creek drainage basin. The subject tract is not located within a FEMA regulated Special Flood Hazard Area. Future development of the tract will have to meet the requirements of the City's Storm Water Design Guidelines. The subject tract is located adjacent to Rock Prairie Road West, a 2-Lane Major Collector, to the south and Holleman Drive South, a 4-Lane Major Collector, to the east. Three future 2-Lane Minor Collectors cross the subject property; Deacon Drive, Cain Road, and Feather Run. Planning &Zoning Commission Page 5 of 6 January 2, 2014 33 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request based on its compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Application 2. Rezoning map Planning &Zoning Commission Page 6 of 6 January 2, 2014 34 FOR OFFICE SE ONLY CASE NO.: DATE SUBMITTED.J1 0.17S TIME: , CITY OF COLLEGE,STATION STAFF: Hone ofTexa;A#.+Af Union ity' ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING) APPLICATION GENERAL MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: :$i,165 Rezoning Application Fee. Applicatlon completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided. Traffic Impact Analysis or calculations of projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA is not necessary for the proposed request. One(1)copy of a fully dimensioned map on 24"x 36"paper showing: a. Land affected; b. Legal description of area of proposed change; c. Present zoning; d. Zoning classification of all abutting land;and e. All public and private rights-of-way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land. Written legal description of subject property (metes& bounds or lot&block of subdivision,whichever is applicable). A CAD(dxf/dwg)-model space State Plane NAD 83 or GIS(shp)digital file(e-mailed to P&DS_Digital_S u bm ittal @cstx.gov). NOTE: If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shall not be filed within a period of 180 days from the date of denial,except with permission of the Planning&Zoning Commission. Date of Optional Preapplication Conference Aust 2013 NAME OF PROJECT Great Oaks Subdivision ADDRESS N/A LEGAL DESCRIPTION(Lot,Block,Subdivision) NIA GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPERTY, IF NOT PLATTED: r_,,_de�uy t e existing reat a s u ivision on t e wes, oc raine oad on the sout , existing uai un bdivision on the north and Holleman Drive on the east. TOTAL ACREAGE 294 acres APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION(Primary contact for the project): Name Mitchell&Morgan, LLP clo Veronica Morgan E-mail v@mitchellandmorgan.com Street Address 511 University Dr East Suite 204 City College Station State Texas Zip Code 77840 Phone Number 979-260-6963 Fax Number 979-260-3564 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name BCS Rock Prairie LP c%Clint Cooper E-mail ccooper@caldwellcos.com Street Address 1700 Research Parkway, Suite 110 City College Station State 7X Zip Code 77845 Phone Number 979-260-7000 Fax Number 10110 Page 1 of 3 35 i OTHER CONTACTS(Please specify type of contact,i.e.project manager,potential buyer, local contact,etc.): Name McClure&Browne c%Jeff Robertson E-mail jeffr@mcclurebrowne.com Street Address 1008 Woodcreek Drive Suite 103 City College Station State TX Zip Code 77845 Phone Number 979-693-3838 Fax Number This property was conveyed to owner by deed dated see attached info sheet and recorded in Volume Page of the Brazos County Official Records. Existing Zoning R-1B&R-Rural Proposed Zoning RS-Restricted Suburban Present Use of Property Vacant Proposed Use of Property Single Family Residential REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION 1. List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. See attached supplemental information sheet. 2. Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. Yes this zone change Is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood? The RS-Restricted Suburban zoning district is the district of choice when stepping up or down between the E- Estate, GS-General Suburban and U-Urban zoning districts, which encompass this area.RS Is the closest zoning district to the current R-1B zoning, but it allows the cluster development which will help in making the transition between E-Estate, GS-General Suburban&U-Urban districts. The design flexibility allowed within the clustering option lands itself to an environmentally sensitive design incorporating the large creeks and natural areas contained in the property. 10/10 Page 2 of 3 36 i 4. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested. The property Is situated in a unique area of College Station with its mixture of surrounding densities and unique topography. The rural developments of Quail Run&existing Great Oaks Subdivisions surround this property on 2 sides. The remaining boundaries consist of a mix of suburban densities such as Las Palomas Subdivision, Rolling Ridge Mobile Home Park, the Barracks and the Cain Road duplexes. The significant difference in densities and types of these developments justify a residential zoning district which can span and coexist between the variety of these existing developments. 5. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. The current zoning district, R-1 B is suitable for the area but we now have the availability of a zoning district with similar lot sizes to R-IB but with much more design flexibility. This allows the design to work with the topography of the property within its cluster development dimensional standards. The R-Rural zoning district on the remainder of the property is not in compliance with the city Land Use Plan. B. Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. As discussed above, the ability to layout and market this property as R-IB without the benefits of the dimensional standards flexibility is not extremely viable. 7. List any other reasons to support this zone change. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. if there is more than one owner,all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. if the owner is a company, the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. — n A �-o 4It t� Sign re and ti Date 10110 )5fF Y Page 3 of 3 37 SL�l lono 41� MIMn 85 SZ, 5 4,,mm I ,R�6 NgE A I lei E L J-1 I (*Arq" CITY OF COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR Harvey Mitchell Parkway South & Rio Grande Boulevard 13-00900247 REQUEST: Suburban Commercial, Urban, and Natural Areas Reserved to Urban and Natural Areas Reserved SCALE: Approximately 7.3 acres LOCATION: 2021 Harvey Mitchell Parkway South, generally located across from the intersection of Rio Grande Boulevard and Harvey Mitchell Parkway South adjacent to the City of College Station electric substations APPLICANT: Veronica Morgan, Mitchell & Morgan, LLP PROJECT MANAGER: Morgan Hester, Staff Planner mhester@cstx.gov PREVIOUS ACTIONS: Prior to this request, the following cases on this property were heard by the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council: • November 2007 — Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Institutional and Floodplain & Streams to Planned Development District and Floodplain & Streams. No official action was taken. • November 2008 —A Preliminary Plat was approved for four lots on approximately 8.255 acres, included in this property RECOMMENDATION: The Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council are requested to make a policy decision. At least three options for action are available as noted below: • Approval —Accept the applicant's proposal of amending the Comprehensive Plan to a Urban and Natural Areas Reserved designation; • Denial —The property will remain Suburban Commercial, Urban, and Natural Areas Reserved as currently designated on the Comprehensive Plan; • Propose an alternative land use and character designation for the subject property. Planning &Zoning Commission Page 1 of 8 January 2, 2014 39 Q� pQ4 W 2 0 W e � c _ r . •.. C-� ❑�¢ °��. .x - \\\ `Tyr d- a cn o \ "ii g e �fj J LU c� s ' 4 w r� o CNLU LU O � �e ' w IL 0 W LU — S o Planning &Zoning Commission Page 2 of 8 January 2, 2014 40 _ S � W a o LLI s _ �a O W vLLI as 1 }- d as x0 c�Y \, - 4• E ai f U -.2-, � m 2 J J a I U dEL _Q F1 HI c W � A LU s > � E �Y 2 EE ` o E IM U H LL a = ` E t Fi r c v a W_ � •P •\ !� `f \y ) W z W EL Z Q � qv&fir f 2� ❑O IM 2 W M N 4 LLJ L W F vi x { O "- <U)S w c7 in a ~ U= m Planning &Zoning Commission Page 3 of 8 January 2,2014 41 �a Q ca Vc- CL C Q EL 4-0 f ca co � R — # t," . � L cu co IN r Rte'. '. .0 L r co I - - - - - Tl;,\\X Planning &Zoning Commission Page 4 of 8 January 2, 2014 42 NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: January 2, 2014 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: January 23, 2014 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station's Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: Augustine-Angelina HOA Lawyer Place HOA Property owner notices mailed: Twenty-six (26). Contacts in support: None at the time of this report. Contacts in opposition: None at the time of this report. Inquiry contacts: None at the time of this report. The applicant and developer held a meeting on December 11, 2013 at the City of College Station Fire Station #3 in which nearby property owners were invited. Six residents representing four households were present. Some of the residents expressed concerns about potential flooding, additional traffic, and lighting as a result of the proposed development. There were also concerns regarding buffering requirements between the development and single- family residences. ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use Natural Areas Reserved, Single-Family North Neighborhood GS General Suburban Residences Conservation South (across Peace Lutheran Harvey Mitchell Suburban R-6 High-Density Church, Friends Parkway) Commercial Multi-Family Congregational Church R-6 High-Density Multi-Family Urban, Suburban development, East Commercial Multi-Family, GC commercial General Commercial businesses Natural Areas R Rural, C-3 Light Vacant, City of West Reserved Commercial College Station Electrical Substation DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: May 1969 Zoning: R-3 Townhome 1978 Currently zoned R Rural, T Townhome, and C-3 Light Commercial Final Plat: Unplatted Site development: Vacant REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Changed or changing conditions in the subject area or the City: The applicant has stated that the Suburban Commercial designation along the frontage of the property has made it difficult for the property to sell and develop. In communication with the applicant, Planning &Zoning Commission Page 5 of 8 January 2, 2014 43 the stated intent is to develop townhouse-style apartments on the site not to exceed 30 dwelling units per acre, the maximum density allowed in R-6 High-Density Multi-Family zoning district. Other than developer-stated market opportunities, there appears to be no change in conditions in the subject area that would invalidate the current land use and character designations for the area. As designated by the Comprehensive Plan, this area is designated as an area of future study for neighborhood plans. In September 2013, the South Knoll Area Neighborhood was adopted. Through this effort, the neighborhood worked with Staff and recommended that any change to the land use of this area be discussed prior to moving forward through Planning & Zoning and the City Council. The applicant met with area residents on December 11, 2013 to discuss future plans for the property. 2. Scope of the request: This request is to amend the Comprehensive Plan Future Lane Use and Character Map designations on this property from Suburban Commercial, Urban, and Natural Areas Reserved to Urban and Natural Areas Reserved. This amendment will eliminate Suburban Commercial on this tract and enlarge the Urban land use while reducing the Natural Areas Reserved. Through the South Knoll Area Neighborhood Plan adopted in 2013, this property was identified as an area that the current zoning and land use designations were in conflict with one another. A City-initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendment was proposed in order to revise the land use on the subject property to be more synonymous with the zoning. Prior to the adoption of the Plan, the property owner indicated that they would not be interested in the proposed amendment. 3. Availability of adequate information: R-6 High-Density Multi-Family is the maximum density for the proposed development on the site. The existing water/waste water facilities are able to support a single-family neighborhood of densities comparable to that which already exist in the area. More intense development would need to be reviewed further. Staff can determine trips generated by the proposed land use to assess the traffic impact. In addition, Staff has 2009 TxDOT traffic counts on Harvey Mitchell Parkway (FM 2818). Harvey Mitchell Parkway South has a capacity of approximately 40,000 VPD. A traffic impact analysis may be required at the time of rezoning to propose any necessary mitigation due to the additional traffic. The change in land use designation is not expected to generate significantly more trips than the current land use designation. At the time of rezoning, a determination will be made if a Traffic Impact Analysis is necessary. 4. Consistency with the goals and strategies set forth in the Plan: The goal for College Station's Future Lane Use and Character is to create a community with strong, unique neighborhoods, protected rural areas, special districts, distinct corridors, and a protected and enhanced natural environment. Relevant Strategies identified in the Plan to achieve this goal include: • Establish and protect distinct boundaries between various character areas: o The existing land use designation acts as a transitional buffer from Harvey Mitchell Parkway South to Neighborhood Conservation areas. o Natural Areas — Reserved allows for protection of Bee Creek in this area as well as a wide buffer from the adjacent neighborhoods. Planning &Zoning Commission Page 6 of 8 January 2, 2014 44 • Promote public and private development and design practices that ensure distinct neighborhoods, districts, and corridors: o The South Knoll Area Neighborhood Plan was designated as an area for further study. In 2013, a Plan was adopted to enhance the area's character. To that end, the Plan established the following goals and reinforced neighborhood integrity and community character: ■ Reduce character impact of high-density housing in the neighborhood; ■ Continue investment in and maintenance of area schools, parks, and trails; ■ Preserve the existing larger-lot development patterns and eclectic architecture; and ■ Create and encourage effective neighborhood organizations. 5. Consideration of the Future Land Use & Character and/or Thoroughfare Plans: The subject tract is currently designated as Natural Areas — Reserved, Urban, and Suburban Commercial on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map. Through this proposed amendment, the Urban area would increase and the Natural Areas — Reserved would be reduced. The Suburban Commercial designation would be eliminated. The proposed Urban designation is suitable for an intense level of development activity. These areas tend to consist of townhouses, duplexes and high-density apartments. Urban allows for a higher density, equivalent to R-6 High-Density Multi-Family standards. The Comprehensive Plan identifies a considerable amount of Urban extending from this property along Harvey Mitchell Parkway towards the intersection with Texas Avenue. The Thoroughfare Plan identifies Harvey Mitchell Parkway South as a 6-lane major arterial and is currently constructed as 4-lanes with a central median and turn lanes. The traffic produced by this type of development is not anticipated to generate a significant increase, but will need to be studied when the property is rezoned or a site plan is submitted. 6. Compatibility with the surrounding area: As stated previously, the amendment request is from Suburban Commercial, Urban, and Natural Areas Reserved to Urban and Natural Areas Reserved. An Urban designation would permit townhomes, duplexes, and high- density apartments. With this type of development, an increased amount of traffic, population, and infrastructure demands can be expected. 7. Impacts on infrastructure including water, wastewater, drainage, and the transportation network: Water service to the tract can be provided by an existing 24-inch water main located along the north side of Harvey Mitchell Parkway South. There is a 21- inch sanitary sewer main west of the property along Bee Creek Tributary B available to serve the property. The Sanitary Sewer Master Plan has identified this sewer line as needing to be upsized in the future. As the property develops, water and sanitary sewer mains will need to be extended into the property in accordance with the Unified Design Guidelines. The change in land use designation is not expected to generate significantly more trips than the current land use designation. As stated earlier, st the time of rezoning, a determination will be made if a Traffic Impact Analysis is necessary. Planning &Zoning Commission Page 7 of 8 January 2, 2014 45 8. Impact on the City's ability to provide, fund, and maintain services: The proposed land use amendment will not impact the City's ability to provide, fund, and maintain services. 9. Impact on environmentally sensitive and natural areas: The subject property is located in the Bee Creek drainage basin and contains FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area. The land use designation for a portion of the 100-year floodplain is proposed to be changed from Natural Areas-Reserved to Urban. This change could increase the intensity of the development allowed on an area of land that is currently undeveloped and intended to be preserved in its natural state for conveyance of floodwaters. No mitigation or analysis has been submitted and it is unclear at this point what impacts site development will have on the drainage system in this area and surrounding areas. 10. Contribution to the overall direction and character of the community as captured in the Plan's vision and goals: The goal for College Station's Future Lane Use and Character is to create a community with strong, unique neighborhoods, protected rural areas, special districts, distinct corridors, and a protected and enhanced natural environment. The tract is located at the perimeter of at the South Knoll Area Neighborhood. The South Knoll Area Plan was adopted in 2013 which calls for further protection of the character of the neighborhood. OPTIONS FOR ACTION The Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council are requested to make a policy decision. At least three options for action are available as noted below: • Approval —Accept the applicant's proposal of amending the Comprehensive Plan to a Urban and Natural Areas Reserved designation; • Denial —The property will remain Suburban Commercial, Urban, and Natural Areas Reserved as currently designated on the Comprehensive Plan; • Propose an alternative land use and character designation for the subject property. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Application 2. Copy of Land Use Amendment Map Planning &Zoning Commission Page 8 of 8 January 2, 2014 46 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY E 454 CASE NO.: s DATE SUBMITTED: TIME: � ~ CITY OF COLLEGE STATION STAFF: HomeofTexasA&MUniversity* COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION (Check all applicable) 7 Related to Community Character ❑ Related to Transportation ❑ Related to Other MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: $1,165 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application Fee. Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided. Two (2) copies of a fully dimensioned map on 24"X 36" paper showing (if applicable): a. Land affected; b. Present zoning of property and zoning classification of all abutting property; c. Current Concept Map and Future Land Use and Character Map classifications and proposed classifications; d. Current Concept Map and Future Land Use and Character Map classifications of all abutting property; e. Current and proposed thoroughfare alignments; f. Currently planned utility infrastructure and proposed utility infrastructure; g. General location and address of property; and h. Total acres of property. Date of Optional Preapplication Conference NAME OF PROJECT Harvey Mitchell/Rio Grande Townhomes ADDRESS N/A LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision) N/A GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPERTY, IF NOT PLATTED: Ion FM2818 east of the CS Electrical Substation near Rio Grande@FM2818 TOTAL ACREAGE 7.267 Acres APPLICANT/ PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project): Name Mitchell&Morgan c/o Veronica Morgan E-mail v@mitchellandmorgan.com Street Address 511 University Dr East Suite 204 City College Station State Tx Zip Code 77840 Phone Number 979-260-6963 Fax Number 979-260-3564 10/10 47 Page 1 of 3 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name Unisource Estate Investments, LLC c%Kamal Rahman E-mail kamal@texasbizx.com Street Address 1910 Labrisa Dr City Bryan State TX Zip Code 77807 Phone Number 979-775-3546 Fax Number 866-281-6724 ANSWER ALL OF THE FOLLOWING: 1. What specific element of the Comprehensive Plan (for example, Land Use and Character designation, Thoroughfare Plan Context Class, or thoroughfare alignment) and at what specific location (if applicable) is requested to be amended? The element we are seeking to amend is the Land Use and Character Designation on the property east of the CS Electrical Substation on FM2818 near the Rio Grande intersection. 2. What is the amendment request? The amendment request is to modify the Land Use from SC- Suburban Commercial, U- Urban and NAR-Natural Areas Reserved to U- Urban and NAR-Natural Areas Reserved. 3. Explain the reason for this amendment. This property is located at the dead end of the FM2818 northern frontage road. Given its location, the tract is much better suited to develop as a single townhouse development rather than a strip of commercial and townhomes hidden behind it. 4. Identify the conditions that have changed to warrant this change to the existing Comprehensive Plan. With regard to the NAR area-the floodplain limits have changed along this section of Bee Creek. We intend to retain NAR along the floodplain and a 20ft buffer beyond the new floodplain limits. This is reflected on this Land Use Plan Amendment map. With regard to the SC- Suburban Commercial to U- Urban, the limited access to FM2818 poses difficulties to the marketability and long term viability of commercial property at this location. Residential uses are adaptable and more suited to deal with limited access and driveway access issues. The ability to market this location as commercial is very difficult. 5. Explain why the existing element of the Comprehensive Plan in question is no longer appropriate. The existing Land Use of SC-Suburban Commercial along the FM2818 northern frontage road will be challenging because of its location and limited access to FM2818. Forcing the continuation of strip commercial along a dead end frontage road is not the most appropriate land use for this property. A residential land use can adapt much better to these access limitations. The existing Land Use of NAR-Natural Area Reserved developed during the Comprehensive Plan adoption used a different floodplain boundary than exists today on the property. The floodplain boundary has been reduced significantly. 6. How does the requested amendment further the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan? The goal of the Comprehensive Plan future land use and character is to "be a community with strong, unique neighborhoods, protected rural areas, special districts, distinct corridors and a protected and enhanced natural environment. With this amendment we are: -protecting the floodplain and a 20ft buffer area along the creek -allowing for the addition to the property tax base -creating a sustainable development appropriate along the limited access provided by the FM2818 frontage road 10/10 48 Page 2 of 3 P 313 2013-11-06 23:57 SULTAN 28185; 1» 9792603554 7.What other information are you providing to support the proposed amendment(for example,transportation impact study)? r!7 7 ---- I The applicant has prepared this applicatlon and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. IF T141S APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the applicafon on its behalf. L It Slgn and title Date Page 3 of 3 10!10 Print Form 49 dH n a95E-09Z(616) 9 i969-09Z(616) XL'NOt171S 3937700 ,/ 3 QbBtC 1 3eF 1,--o7 r aoz�.s as 3 .e 41,--n ITS S3WOHNM01 30NIYtl9 Olt! sroht1-0pue—usWaba]insuoD 1773HO11WA3AUVI4 a T�'°ea ow s uaw°w 1N3WON9kVV 9Sn ONG7 E � 6 0 V mo� � LL�m W£ry�Vo�3" - iJ' N� a 6 CL ( -�v_ E �tt EE °o q U o )d 30N aa�ora o m E = c — V — TZN o E//�� n4AnlnneYlf gym' Q c E ab \ m F : X NpQ� W S 9 �j2 �Oto 1 :I