HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/17/2014 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning Commission CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Home of Texas A&M University
Planning & Zoning
Commission
July 17, 2014
City Hall Council Chambers
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas
Workshop Meeting 6:00 PM
Regular Meeting 7 :00 PM
(*0Fq"
AGENDA
CITY OF COUEGE STATION
Home ofTexarA&M University PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
WORKSHOP MEETING
JULY 17, 2014,AT 6:00 P.M.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1101 TEXAS AVENUE
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
1. Call the meeting to order.
2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items.
3. Discussion of Minor and Amending Plats approved by Staff.
• Final Plat—Minor Plat— College Hills Woodlands Lots 15R— 16R Case#14-
00900041 (J. Schubert)
4. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. [New Development
List]
5. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the status of items within the 2014
P&Z Plan of Work(see attached). (J. Schubert)
6. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the scope and process for pursuing
possible revisions to the non-residential architecture standards. (J.Schubert)
7. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming
Meetings.
• Thursday,July 24,2014—City Council Meeting—Council Chambers—Workshop 6:00
p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. (Liaison— Oldham)
• Thursday, August 7, 2014—P&Z Meeting—Council Chambers —Workshop 6:00 p.m.
and Regular 7:00 p.m.
8. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review
Board, Joint Parks / Planning & Zoning Subcommittee, BioCorridor Board, BioCorridor
Plan Process, 5-Year Comprehensive Plan Review Subcommittee, and Zoning District
Subcommittee.
9. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning & Zoning Member
may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific
factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given.Any deliberation shall
be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
10. Adjourn.
2014 Planning & Zoning Commission Plan of Work
Comprehensive Plan Implementation
Implementation of Adopted Plans
Summary: Project Dates:
Implementation of adopted master plans and
neighborhood, district, and corridor plans, namely:
Central College Station, Eastgate, Southside Area,
Wellborn Community, and South Knoll Area
neighborhood plans, and Bicycle, Pedestrian &
Greenways, Parks and Recreation, Water, Waste
Water, Medical District, and Economic Development
master plans.
Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff jAnticipated Completion: On-going
Five-Year Comprehensive Plan Report
Summary: Project Dates:
As called for in the Comprehensive Plan, complete a 4/23/14: Joint subcommittee meeting.
five-year evaluation and appraisal report to assess 5/9/14: Joint subcommittee meeting.
existing Plan and its success in achieving the 6/3/14: Joint subcommittee meeting.
community's goals. 7/16/14: Joint subcommittee meeting.
Staff Assigned: J. Prochazka lAnticipated Completion: Summer 2014
Five-Year Comprehensive Plan Report Implementation
Summary: Project Dates:
Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff Anticipated Completion:
Multi-Family & Mixed Use Zoning Districts
Summary: Project Dates:
Create and adopt new zoning districts for Urban and
Urban Mixed Use designations to implement these
future land use and character designations identified in
the Comprehensive Plan.
Staff Assigned: J. Prochazka Anticipated Completion: Summer 2014
Walton Drive Commercial Overlay
Summary: Project Dates:
Create and adopt a zoning overlay to address parking 12/11/13: Stakeholder meeting with property owners to
and other non-conformities for the commercial area at introduce possible overlay concept.
Walton Drive and Texas Avenue as identified in the 5/15/14: Presentation at P&Z Workshop.
Eastgate Neighborhood Plan.
Staff Assigned: J. Schubert lAnticipated Completion: Summer 2014
Wellborn Zoning Districts
Summary: Project Dates:
Create and adopt new or modified zoning districts as
identifed in the Wellborn Community Plan.
Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff JAnticipated Completion: Fall 2014
Page 1 of 3
Research and Education
College Station Population
Summary: Project Dates:
Overview of College Station's current population 5/1/14: Presentation at P&Z Workshop.
estimate and report on implications of exceeding the
100,000 mark.
Staff Assigned: M. Hester I Item Completed: May 2014
Easterwood Airport Master Plan
Summary: Project Dates:
Report on Easterwood Airport Master Plan and
consideration of potential implications of any future
plans for expansion.
Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff JAnticipated Completion:
Non-Residential Architecture Standards
Summary: Project Dates:
Review existing standards to evaluate if updates are 6/19/14: Presentation at P&Z Workshop.
needed to reflect current practices and allow more 7/17/14: Discussion of proposed amendment
flexibility in design. Ireview at P&Z Workshop.
Staff Assigned: Jason Schubert JAnticipated Completion:
Planning & Development Services Organizational Review Implementation
Summary: Project Dates:
Continue implementation of the review by completing
identified policy discussions, ordinance revisions, and
process and service improvements.
Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff JAnticipated Completion:
Recently-Adopted Zoning Districts
Summary: Project Dates:
Overview of the recently adopted zoning disticts. 4/17/14: Presentation at P&Z Workshop.
Staff Assigned: T. Rogers Item Completed: April 2014
Review of Adopted Plans
Summary: Project Dates:
This item includes after action review of Northgate, 6/5/14: Tour during P&Z Workshop to include sites in
BioCorridor, and Medical Districts, update on Northgate, BioCorridor, and Medical District.
Water/Wastewater Master Plan, and update on
implementation of adopted neighborhood and small
area plans.
Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff JAnticipated Completion:
Page 2 of 3
Sign Regulations
Summary: Project Dates:
Evaluate sign regulations related to electronic message 5/12/14: Presentation at Council Workshop to receive
boards. direction from Council.
7/3/14: P&Z unanimously recommended approval
of proposed sign ordinance.
7/24/14: Proposed sign ordinance revisions presented
to Council for consideration.
Staff Assigned: M. Hester/J. Schubert JAnticipated Completion:
Transportation Planning
Summary: Project Dates:
Update regarding Metropolitan Planning Organization
(MPO) transportation planning initiatives.
Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff Anticipated Completion:
Page 3 of 3
(*.4/q"
AGENDA
CITY of COLLEGE STATION PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Home ofTexasA&M University'
REGULAR MEETING
JULY 17,20149 AT 7:00 P.M.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1101 TEXAS AVENUE
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
1. Call meeting to order.
2. Pledge of Allegiance.
3. Hear Citizens.At this time,the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address
the Commission on planning and zoning issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda.
The citizen presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate
everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for
completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city
staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A
recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.)
All matters listed under Item 4, ConsentAgenda, are considered routine by the Planning&Zoning
Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans and final
plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items
approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. There will not be
separate discussion of these items. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent
Agenda it will be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration.
4. Consent Agenda
4.1 Consideration, possible action, and discussion to approve Meeting Minutes.
• July 3, 2014 —Workshop
• July 3, 2014—Regular
4.2 Presentation,possible action, and discussion on a Preliminary Plan for Indian Lakes
Phase 25 consisting of 10 lots on approximately 31.53 acres generally located east
of the southern-most end of Indian Lakes Drive in the Indian Lakes Subdivision,
approximately one mile southwest of State Highway 6 in the City's Extraterritorial
Jurisdiction. Case#14-00900117 (J. Schubert)
4.3 Presentation,possible action, and discussion on a Final Plat for Pebble Creek Phase
7-C consisting of 49 residential lots on approximately 29.545 acres located at 1320
Royal Adelade Loop, generally located east of Pebble Creek Parkway and south of
Pebble Creek Subdivision Phases 7A & 7B. Case #13-00900217 (J. Schubert)
Regular Agenda
5. Consideration,possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent Agenda
by Commission action.
6. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a waiver request to Unified
Development Ordinance Section 12-8.3.G`Blocks' and a presentation,possible action, and
discussion on a Preliminary Plan for Barron Crest Subdivision consisting of 31 lots on
approximately 9.892 acres located at 2668, 2670 & 2716 Barron Road, more generally
located across from the Sonoma Subdivision. Case #14-00900053 (J. Schubert)
7. Public hearing, presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding an ordinance
amending Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 12-4.2, "Official
Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing
the zoning district boundaries from GC General Commercial and R-4 Multi-Family to R-4
Multi-Family on approximately 2.6 acres for Herman F. Krenek Subdivision Phase Two
Lot 5B and a 0.752-acre tract described as Tract 1 and 0.393-acre tract described as Tract
2 by a deed to Sylvia H.Robinson recorded in volume 9511,page 270 of the Official Public
Records of Brazos County, Texas, the property generally located at 2315 and 2317 Texas
Avenue South. Case #14-00900144 (J. Schubert) (Note: Final action of this item is
scheduled for the August 14,2014 City Council meeting— subject to change)
8. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning & Zoning Member
may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific
factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation
shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
9. Adjourn.
(*0Fq"
MINUTES
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Home ofTmasA&MUnivenisy' Workshop Meeting
July 3, 2014., 6:30 p.m.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
College Station, Texas
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Bo Miles,Jerome Rektorik,Jane Kee,Jodi Warner,and Rick Floyd
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Casey Oldham and Jim Ross
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Blanche Brick
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Lance Simms, Molly Hitchcock, Alan Gibbs, Jason Schubert, Jennifer
Prochazka,Morgan Hester,Kevin Ferrer,Jessica Bullock,Jerry Cuaron,Adam Falco,Jeremy Alderete,and
Robin Krause
1. Call the meeting to order.
Chairman Miles called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items.
There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding Regular Agenda Item 6.
3. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City.New Development List
There was no discussion regarding new development applications submitted to the City.
4. Presentation,possible action, and discussion regarding the status of items within the 2014 P&Z Plan of
Work(see attached). (J. Schubert)
Principal Planner Schubert gave an update regarding the 2014 P&Z Plan of Work.
5. Presentation, possible action, and discussion regarding a Semi-Annual Report on Impact Fees 92-01,
97-01, 97-02B, 99-01, and 03-02. (A. Gibbs)
City Engineer Gibbs gave a presentation regarding a Semi-Annual Report on Impact Fees.
There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding the Semi-Annual Report.
Commissioner Warner motioned to approve the Semi-Annual Report. Commissioner
Rektorik seconded the motion,motion passed (5-0).
6. Presentation,possible action, and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings.
Thursday,July 10,2014—P&Z Meeting—Council Chambers—Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular
7:00 p.m. (Liaison—Miles)
July 3,2014 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 2
Thursday,July 17,2014—P&Z Meeting—Council Chambers—Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular
7:00 p.m.
Chairman Miles reviewed the above-mentioned meetings and stated that the City Council
meeting on July 10th had been cancelled.
7. Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, Joint
Parks/Planning & Zoning Subcommittee, BioCorridor Board, BioCorridor Plan Process, 5-Year
Comprehensive Plan Review Subcommittee,and Zoning District Subcommittee.
There was general discussion regarding the above-mentioned meetings.
8. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items-A Planning&Zoning Member may inquire about
a subject for which notice has not been given.A statement of specific factual information or the recitation
of existing policy may be given.Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an
agenda for a subsequent meeting
Commissioner Kee asked for a future agenda item regarding parkland dedication and vesting related to
replating lots and building plots.
9. Adjourn.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:56 p.m.
Approved: Attest:
Bo Miles,Chairman Robin Krause,Permit Technician
Planning&Zoning Commission Planning &Development Services
July 3,2014 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 2
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION MINUTES
Home of Texas A&M University* PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
July 3, 2014, 7:00 p.m.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
College Station, Texas
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Bo Miles,Jerome Rektorik,Jane Kee,Jodi Warner, Rick Floyd
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Jim Ross and Casey Oldham
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Blanche Brick
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Lance Simms, Molly Hitchcock, Alan Gibbs, Jason Schubert, Jennifer
Prochazka, Jessica Bullock, Jerry Cuaron, Kevin Ferrer, Morgan Hester, Adam Falco, Jeremy Alderete,
and Robin Krause
1. Call Meeting to Order
Chairman Miles called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m.
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Hear Citizens
No citizens spoke.
4. Consent Agenda
4.1 Consideration,possible action,and discussion to approve meeting minutes.
* June 19,2014—Workshop
* June 19,2014—Regular
Commissioner Rektorik motioned to approve Consent Agenda Item 4.1. Commissioner
Warner seconded the motion,motion passed (5-0).
Regular Agenda
5. Consideration, possible action, and discussion on items removed from the Consent Agenda by
Commission action.
No items were removed from the Consent Agenda.
July 3,2014 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 3
6. Public hearing,presentation,possible action,and discussion on a Final Plat of the West Park 2nd
Addition Lots 9R-11R,Block A being a Replat of West Park 2nd Addtion Lots 9& 10,Block A
consisting of three single-family residential lots on approximately 0.45 acres,located at 703 &705
Wellborn Road, and more generally located at the southwest intersection of Luther Street and
Wellborn Road. Case#14-00900037(M.Hester)
Staff Planner Hester presented the replat and recommended approval with condition that the
existing structure encroaching into setbacks be demolished or moved.
There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding parkland dedication and removal
of the existing structure.
Chairman Miles opened the public hearing.
No one spoke during the public hearing.
Chairman Miles closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Rektorik motioned to approve the replat with the condition that the existing
structure encroaching into setbacks be demolished or moved. Commissioner Warner
seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0).
7. Public hearing,presentation,possible action, and discussion regarding an amendment to Chapter
12—Unified Development Ordinance, Section 12-7.5.0 "Fuel Price Signs"and Section 12-7.5.CC
"Electronic Reader Boards" of the Code of Ordinances regarding sign regulations. Case #14-
00900149 (M.Hester) (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the July 24,2014 City
Council meeting—subject to change)
Staff Planner Hester presented the amendment regarding sign regulations and recommended
approval.
There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding the amendment to the ordinance.
Chairman Miles opened the public hearing.
Ray Hansen, 730 N. Rosemary, Bryan, Texas, gave an overview of the need for larger fuel price
signs.
Sherry Ellison, 2705 Brookway Dr, College Station,Texas,expressed opposition to the change of
"Electronic Reader Board"ordinance.
Chairman Miles closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Warner motioned to recommend approval of the the amendments to the
ordinance regarding sign regulations.Commissioner Kee seconded the motion,motion passed
(5-0).
July 3,2014 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3
8. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items—A Planning&Zoning Member may inquire
about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or
the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to
place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
There was no discussion amongst the Commission regarding future agenda items.
9. Adjourn
The meeting was adjourned at 7:57 p.m.
Approved: Attest:
Bo Miles,Chairman Robin Krause,Permit Technician
Planning&Zoning Commission Planning &Development Services
July 3,2014 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3
CITY OF 'COLLEGE STATION
PRELIMINARY PLAN
for
Indian Lakes Ph 25
14-00900117
SCALE: Ten residential lots on approximately 31.53 acres
LOCATION: Generally located east of the southern-most end of Indian Lakes
Drive in the Indian Lakes Subdivision, approximately one mile
southwest of State Highway 6 in the City's Extraterritorial
Jurisdiction
ZONING: N/A (ETJ)
APPLICANT: Travis Martinek, Smiling Mallard Development, Ltd.
PROJECT MANAGER: Jason Schubert, AICP, Principal Planner
jschubert@cstx.gov
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan.
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 1 of 4
July 17, 2014
�{ ..
_ �,
yh ■
1�� ..
�. 1
�,'` - _ -
_ � �-- � _
�'c I r� ; � I� ,= f
I� 4
_. _ ,;'
y
ti �� ;�
�� - � �.
-�� �r�
��
°r.
tyl � ; I ■
V f }
� ����" �"
! 5. ., �.:
� y ,t��� i �. �`
� �"=R i ,�
`-
��1�..
_� � `
. �
.r; r+ �'
ri � ��;"` _ 1'�
rs � �
. .
� �� '�'
4,� � � - r x
. p' !: �d �.— —
� �� �.
f
. : ..-
� ,
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: N/A (ETJ)
Zoning: N/A (ETJ)
Master Planned: Master Plan approved in 2002. Subsequent preliminary plats and
final plats have been approved every year since 2004.
Site development: Vacant. Ten residential lots are proposed, ranging from 1.15
acres to 2.2 acres.
COMMENTS
Water: Provided by Wellborn Special Utility District.
Sewer: Sanitary sewer service will be provided by private on-septic
systems on each lot. These facilities will be permitted by the
Brazos County Health Department.
Off-site Easements: None at this time.
Drainage: Drainage is generally to the north within the Peach Creek
Drainage Basin.
Flood Plain: There is no FEMA regulated floodplain located on the property.
Greenways: N/A
Pedestrian Connectivity: This site is located in the ETJ so sidewalks are not required.
Bicycle Connectivity: This site is located in the ETJ and no specific facilities for bicycle
connectivity are required.
Streets: Access will be provided from Indian Lakes Phase 10 via Indian
Lakes Drive.
Oversize Request: N/A
Parkland Dedication Fees: This development was approved as a Master Plan in the ETJ prior
to parkland dedication requirements being applicable in the ETJ.
Therefore, no parkland dedication is required.
Impact Fees: N/A
REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance: The
Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Rural. The City, however, does not have land
use authority in the ETJ. The proposed lots will have access through rural residential
streets that connect to Indian Lakes Drive.
2. Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The Preliminary Plat complies with the
applicable Subdivision Regulations contained in the Unified Development Ordinance.
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 3 of 4
July 17, 2014
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Application
2. Copy of Preliminary Plan
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 4 of 4
July 17, 2014
FOR OFFICE USE
ONLY
CASE NO.: I q •
DATE SUBMITTED: e]'
CITY OF COLLEGE TIME ], LSTATION '4O
Home of Texas A&M University' STAFF: t—
PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
�/❑X $932 Preliminary Plan Application Fee.
❑ $233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable).
Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used
and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
t� Six (6)folded copies of plan. A revised mylar original must be submitted after approval.
❑x Title report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate
current within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership, liens,
encumbrances, etc.
f❑ Impact study (if oversized participation is requested).
f❑- The attached Preliminary Plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are
not.
Date of Optional Preapplication Conference N/A
NAME OF PROJECT Indian Lakes-Phase-2;2'* 2S (M TN)
ADDRESS Southeast of the current termination of Indian Lakes Drive
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION:
Southeast of the current termination of Indian Lakes Drive
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name Travis Ma►tinek E-mail travis@clarkewyndham.com
Street Address 3608 East 29th Street, Suite 100
City Bryan State Texas Zip Code 77802
Phone Number (979) 846-4384 Fax Number (979) 846-1461
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (ALL owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple
owners):
Name Smiling Mallard Development, Ltd. E-mail travis@clarkewyndham.com
Street Address 3608 East 29th Street, Suite 100
City Bryan State Texas Zip Code 77802
Phone Number (979) 846-4384 Fax Number (979) 846-1461
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION
Name McClure &Browne, Inc. E-mail leffr@mcclurebrowne.com
Street Address 1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103
City College Station State Texas Zip Code 77845
Phone Number (979) 693-3838 Fax Number (979) 693-2554
Revised 4/14 Page 1 of 6
Total Acreage 31.53 Total No. of Lots 10 R-O-W Acreage 4.88
Number of Lots By Zoning District NIA / N/A N/A / N/A N/A / N/A
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
N/A / N/A N/A / N/A N/A / N/A N/A / N/A
Floodplain Acreage 0.02 AC
NOTE: Appropriate zoning for the proposed subdivision must be in place before this application can be
considered complete.
Are you proposing to dedicate park land by acreage or fee in lieu of land? NIA
Are you proposing to r develop the park r: dedicate the development fee? (Check one)
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
Fx— Yes
r No
If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
additional sheets if necessary)
Project Name: Indian Lakes
City Project Number(in known): Unknown
Date/Timeframe when submitted: 2000
Requested wavier to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable):
N/A
Revised 4/14 Page 2 of 6
Regarding the waiver request, explain how:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the
subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.
N%A
2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
NIA
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other
property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
N/A
4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance.
N/A
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable):
1. F An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way;
2. r The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the
purposes and goals of the LIDO or the City's comprehensive Plan;
3. r A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12) months;
4. r Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate/
rural context;
5. rI When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Master Plan;
Revised 4/14 Page 3 of 6
6. r The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and
Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO; or
7. r The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway/ Expressway as designated by Map 6.6,
Thoroughfare Plan - Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Detailed explanation of condition identified above:
N/A
NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the
same time by the Planning &Zoning Commission.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached
hereto are true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE
OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from
the owner. If there is more than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If
the owner is a company, the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's
representative to sign the application on its behalf. LIEN HOLDERS identified in the title report are also
considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as described above.
�2 6��/,�Lo
Signature and 6t Date
Revised 4/14 Page 4 of 6
iS i�S
� o �
w Q @ s v z ( W
SR0 O
a. O •k
W ry o a _
Z U � lil
W
cr. CC
yN
CZ Qall
LL
mx 4Q4Q
J1 11
Way
y
� Q
LEO
OF
4 i 33.� fes/ .:N1T'73Yd.afl• �m � - � ♦.1r�/% � g�xewm
9
R OO.�....
�o� mom. '� / - �MmR599�3k$88x$$
r
a
/ � s
'41 fes,
—
/ gc
11.1a as 11
y .4 affi g
M �
liggh
e"€
jI
$ �@`
� 'a $W a o9 �s_ s��€
a a a a s gig _ <€
affill IN I-. RUN 11 X
(*Arq"
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
FINAL PLAT
for
Pebble Creek Ph 7C
13-00900217
SCALE: 49 single-family lots on 29.545 acres
LOCATION: 1320 Royal Adelade Loop, generally located east of Pebble Creek
Parkway and south of Pebble Creek Phases 7A & 7B
ZONING: GS General Suburban
APPLICANT: Davis Young, Pebble Creek Development
PROJECT MANAGER: Jason Schubert, AICP, Principal Planner
jschubert@cstx.gov
PROJECT OVERVIEW: This request is for a Final Plat of 49 single-family lots on 29.545
acres. The Preliminary Plan for Phases 7C and 7D was approved
by the Planning and Zoning Commission on September 5, 2013.
The adjacent Phases 7A, 7-131, and 7-132 were final platted in
August 1999 and January 2003, January 2005 respectively.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat.
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 1 of 3
July 17, 2014
i
Mp.Aul �* 'tar{`• °"$ r 'dC'•#'` ,� ct s ``•4 t',��^w§�� -�
Jr
`+ a
Y wa C X-1
e
ppp .L h
p _
v
.� t fEk� � ��I� 1 d t• -�
1�
i
p.
ti
• P
a•
1 �
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: October 1983 and December 1994
Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open (upon annexation)
R-1 Single-Family Residential (2004)
R-1 Single-Family Residential, renamed GS General Suburban
(2013)
Preliminary Plan: Approved by the Commission on September 5, 2013
Site Development: Vacant
COMMENTS
Parkland Dedication: Parkland dedication requirements have been met through land
dedication with previous development of the Pebble Creek
Subdivision.
Greenways: No greenway dedication is required or proposed.
Pedestrian Connectivity: Sidewalks will be constructed along both sides of all proposed
streets.
Bicycle Connectivity: No additional bicycle facilities will be provided with Phase 7C.
Impact Fees: N/A
REVIEW CRITERIA
Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The proposed Final Plat is in compliance with the
Preliminary Plan and Subdivision Regulations contained in the Unified Development Ordinance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Application
2. Copy of Final Plat
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 3 of 3
July 17, 2014
FOR OFFIC-E USE ONLY
CASE NO.:
DATE SUBMITTED: (19
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION TIME: 1:?r eS
Home of Texan AdM Univtrsity' STAFF: _
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
(Check one) ❑ Minor ❑ Amending ❑X Final ❑ Vacating ❑Replat
($700) ($700) ($932) ($932) ($932)
Is this plat in the ETJ? ❑ Yes ❑ No Is this plat Commercial ❑ or Residential ❑
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
U $700-$932 Final Plat Application Fee (see above).
❑ $233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable).
X❑ $600 (minimum) Development Permit Application / Public Infrastructure Review and Inspection Fee. Fee is
1% of acceptable Engineer's Estimate for public infrastructure, $600 minimum (if fee is > $600, the balance is
due prior to the issuance of any plans or development permit).
,/f] Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used and
y� may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
o Fourteen (14)folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after approval.)
V/(]x Two (2) copies of the grading, drainage, and erosion control plans with supporting drainage report.
❑x Two (2) copies of the Public infrastructure plans and supporting documents (if applicable).
Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable).
Title report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate
current within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership, liens,
r
encumbrances, etc.
❑ Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D.
0 The attached Final Plat checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
NOTE: A mylar of the approved preliminary plan must be on file before a final plat application will be considered
complete. If the mylar is submitted with the final plat application, it shall be considered a submittal for the
preliminary plan project and processed and reviewed as such. Until the mylar has been confirmed by staff
to be correct, the final plat application will be considered incomplete.
Date of Optional Preapplication or Stormwater Management Conference
NAME OF PROJECT Pebble Creek Phase 7C
ADDRESS
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLAT:
Adjacent to Phase 7B of the Pebble Creek Subdivision
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name Same as Property Owner E-mail
Street Address
City State Zip Code
Phone Number Fax Number
1/11 Page 1 of 9
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (All owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple
owners):
Name Same as Applicant E-mail
Street Address
City State Zip Code
Phone Number Fax Number
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name McClure & Browne Engineering(Jeff Robertson) E-mail leffr@mcclurebrowne.com
Street Address 1008 Woodcreek
City College Station State Tx Zip Code 77845
Phone Number 979-693-3838 Fax Number
Do any deed restrictions or covenants exist for this property? ❑ Yes ❑X No
Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so, please provide the Volume and Page No.
Total Acreage 29.545 Total No. of Lots 49 R-O-W Acreage 4.6
Existing Use Open Proposed Use Single Family Residential
Number of Lots By Zoning District 49 / GS
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
0.51 GS
Floodplain Acreage 3.0
Is there Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A or Zone AE on FEMA FIRM panels) on the property? FX_ Yes r No
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
F- Yes
F_ No
If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
additional sheets if necessary)
Project Name:
City Project Number(if known):
Date/Timeframe when submitted-
Revised 4/14 Page 2 of 9
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and Preliminary Plan (if applicable):
Requested waiver to subdivision regulations and reason for same if applicable):
Regarding the waiver request, explain how:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the
subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.
2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other
property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance.
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable):
1. r An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way;
2. r The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the
purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan;
3. F A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12) months;
4. F_ Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate/
rural context;
5. r When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Master Plan;
1/11 Page 3 of 9
6. (— The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and
Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO; or
7. The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway i Expressway as designated by Map 6.6,
Thoroughfare Plan- Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Detailed explanation of condition identified above:
NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the
same time by the Planning &Zoning Commission.
Requested Oversize Participation Cost differential between 12"& 8"waterline along Royal Adelade and Bulle Rock Ct.
Total Linear Footage of Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
Proposed Public:
3,330 Streets ACREAGE:
6,327Sidewalks No. of acres to be dedicated +$ development fee
3,417Sanitary Sewer Lines
No. of acres in floodplain
3,567Water Lines
No. of acres in detention
Channels No. of acres in greenways
1 299OR
Storm Sewers
Bike Lanes Paths
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
/
No. of SF Dwelling Units X$ _ $
(date)Approved by Parks & Recreation Advisory Board
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING,.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are
true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more
than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf. LIEN
HOLDERS identified in the title report are also considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as
described above.
1 I
Signature and7 ?7-- Date1
i
1/11 Page 4 of 9
i
i
CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT
i
Owner Certification:
1. Nowork of any kind may start until a permit is issued.
2. Theipermit may be revoked if any false statements are made herein.
3. If revoked, all work must cease until permit is re-issued.
4. Development shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued.
5. The:permit will expire if no significant work is progressing within 24 months of issuance.
6. Oth�r permits may be required to fulfill local,state, and federal requirements. Owner will obtain or show
comaliance with all necessary State and Federal Permits prior to construction including NO[and SWPPP.
7. If required, Elevation Certificates will be provided with elevations certified during construction (forms at slab pre-
pour and post construction,
8. Owner hereby gives consent to City representatives to make reasonable inspections required to verify
com)liance.
9. If,st rmwater mitigation is required, including detention ponds proposed as part of this project, it shall be
desi;ned and constructed first in the construction sequence of the project.
10. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken
to Insure that all debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets,or
existirig drainage facilities.All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to
and 4ppreved by the City Engineer for the above named project.All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the
City f College Station shall apply.
11. The information and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents will comply with the
curre t requirements of the City of College Station,Texas City Code,Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Design Guidelines Technical Specifications,and Standard Details.All development has been designed in
accoi,dance with all applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station and State and Federal
ReguIlations.
12. Release of plans to (name or firm)is authorized for bidding purposes
only. understand that final approval and release of plans and development for construction is contingent on
contr ctor signature on approved Development Permit.
13. I,TH OWNER,AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN,AND IN ATTACHMENTS FOR
THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION,ARE,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,TRUE,AND
ACCORATE.
Propeity Owner Date
Engineer Certification:
1. The project has been designed to ensure that stormwater mitigation, including detention ponds, proposed as part
of thi project will be constructed first in the construction sequence.
2. 1 will,obtain or can show compliance with all necessary Local, State and Federal Permits prior to construction
including NOI and SWPPP. Design will not preclude compliance with TPDES: i.e., projects over 10 acres may
requ re a sedimentation basin.
3. The nformation and conclusions contained in the attached plans and supporting documents comply with the
current requirements of the City of College Station,Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and associated BCS Unified
Desi Guidelines.All development has been designed in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances
of the City of College Station and State and Federal Regulations.
4. I, THENGINEER,AGREE TO AND CERTIFY THAT ALL STATEMENTS HEREIN,AND IN ATTACHMENTS
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION,ARE,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,TRUE,AND
ACC RATE.
I
Engin r' � � Date I -
b'
Revised 4/14 Page 5 of 9
I
The following CERTIFICATIONS apply to development in Special Flood Hazard Areas.
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, Fill / Grading Permits, and Clearing Only
Permits:*
A. !, � 1�j Z_ certify, as demonstrated in the attached drainage study, that the
alterations or development covered by this permit, shall not:
(i) increase the Base Flood elevation;
(ii) create additional areas of Special Flood Hazard Area;
(iii) decrease the conveyance capacity to that part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is not in the floodway
and where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood event is greater than one foot per second. This area can
also be approximated to be either areas within 100 feet of the boundary of the regulatory floodway or
areas where the depth of from the BFE to natural ground is 18 inches or greater;
(iv) reduce the Base Flood water storage volume to the part of the Special Flood Hazard Area that is beyond
the floodway and conveyance area where the velocity of flow in the Base Flood is equal to and less than
one foot per second without acceptable compensation as set forth in the City of College Station Code of
Ordinances, Chapter 13 concerning encroachment into the Special Flood Hazard Area; nor
(v) increase Base Flood velocities.
beyond those areas exempted by ordinance in Section 5.11.3a of Chapter 13 Code of Ordinances.
Engine Date
Initial
* If a platting-status exemption to this requirement is asserted, provide written justification under separate
u letter in lieu of certification.
Required for Site Plans, Final Plats, Construction Plans, and Fill / Grading Permits:
B. I, , certify to the following:
(i) that any nonresidential or multi-family structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is
designed to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100-year storm.
Engineer Date
Additional certification for Floodway Encroachments:
C. I, certify that the construction, improvement, or fill covered by this
permit shall not increase the base flood elevation. I will apply for a variance to the Zoning Board of Adjustments.
Engineer Date
1/11 Page 6 of 9
M N
w $
dell
�8I
spg^ �p �� Y 0 �
i� � � �
t• a b �3 } �e "-a
jig 3
vill as ]$ PqIn
Ali
a U-yyy A
If
Ah
eIR
$a ib 3 `a E s s s� 5;P s Y¢ saa�$'a„ s ?8 18
ar =ea gfr s
a 3, 3} a e a a:8 aY ,; gr =fes a Ysaaa� -Yaa $ .�
111C,
a�t � A341
a k a�E sas s as a o nah=1s a ^g
it • 5€ 'a
"§
s a k d € $g # $a3u JSP
F dg $
/
r-� v / Ar�rii t (*•• � \ � w x 3 s w u w x w z•u w u w w •'i.� ' ^Oyu ry� F$''d��$
�.�� d,v¢ ��� �I � �$Ei 1 Vim• '�3p`� \ '� �tl'N°jk`f��� $
11 111. � es• � r W L , /�{i \�'¢ '7��}'b
_
$ � �� �.�''� ��� ---�s�___ --�- �•� °� �"`ter II �� � \
s
+
_ 01
�R skmaaae"km�nF� r_"""j 1 �� Vo •-:1 --s � .' e k .\
di
$�8$$8$
a$aRRRa��$FFaa
a
$5'n$Rg3a�3'ka$3:s�ig v;
a+ a
="s�c����nc��35a�3 , ,.Wo
00
11110M,RRRa1% eR aCI
silt
a�2�S�q a a�a"_Y$�_ �ja� /'� ,�\`1 •a��a +5ti 8�°
r +
�naasaeas� �
(*Orr
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
PRELIMINARY PLAN
for
Barron Crest Subdivision
14-00900053
SCALE: 31 lots on 9.892 acres
LOCATION: 2668, 2670 & 2716 Barron Road, more generally located across
from the Sonoma Subdivision
ZONING: GS General Suburban
APPLICANT: Blake Cathy and Traditions Montessori School
PROJECT MANAGER: Jason Schubert, AICP, Principal Planner
jschubert@cstx.gov
PROJECT OVERVIEW: The proposed Preliminary Plan creates a 30-lot single-family
subdivision in a predominantly single-family area. The Traditions
Montessori School lot is also included within the boundary of the
Preliminary Plan as the rear 25 feet of their lot is proposed to be
included as part of some of the proposed single-family lots. The
future Final Plat will include a replat of the Traditions Montessori
School lot to subdivide that portion off.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the block length waiver along Hofburg
Drive. If the Planning & Zoning Commission approves the waiver,
the Preliminary Plan will be in compliance with the remaining
Subdivision Regulations and Staff would recommend approval. If
the waiver request is denied, the Preliminary Plan must also be
denied.
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 1 of 5
July 17, 2014
< J
� Q.
Q y I Att
CL
ti
r)
p
\ '{Jr
JI
�l6 z
0
D
m
�J °b (n 0
� m
0 04
Z �
w
M
Q
��J�' p�3`rS f ✓ `i�( �O �
w �y 4L W
` 2fN
W
f rk',"
i
4�ttir'v e.
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 2 of 5
July 17, 2014
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: June 1995
Zoning: A-O Agricultural Open upon annexation;
1.5 acres rezoned R-1 Single Family Residential (2009);
3.4 acres rezoned R-1 Single Family Residential (2011);
A-O Agricultural Open renamed to R Rural and R-1 Single-Family
Residential renamed GS General Suburban (2013);
2 acres rezoned GS General Suburban (2014); and
2.92 acres rezoned GS General Suburban (2014)
Site development: A single-family home exists on the 1.5-acre portion at 2716 Barron
Road. The remaining 3.4 acres of the tract are undeveloped.
A manufactured home exists on the 2-acre portion at 2670 Barron
Road.
A single-family home is being converted into private school
(Traditions Montessori School) on the 2.92-acre portion at 2668
Barron Road.
COMMENTS
Water: The subject tract is located adjacent to an 8-inch water main to the
north and an 18-inch water main to the south, and is proposing to
extend a 6-inch water system through the subdivision.
Sewer: The subject tract is extending a 6-inch sanitary sewer main across
Barron Road from the Sonoma Subdivision and will continue a 6-
inch sanitary sewer system through the subdivision
Off-site Easements: None known at this time.
Drainage: The subject tract is located in the Spring Creek Drainage Basin.
The subject tract is proposing to construct an on-site storm water
detention facility. The proposed development will be required to
comply with the City's Storm Water Design Guidelines and
Standards.
Flood Plain: The subject tract is not located within a FEMA regulated Special
Flood Hazard Area per FEMA FIRM panel 325E.
Greenways: No greenways are proposed or required.
Pedestrian Connectivity: Sidewalks exist on Barron Road and Hofburg Drive and will be
constructed on both sides of Crestmont Drive.
Bicycle Connectivity: Bike lanes exist along Barron Road and no other bicycle facilities
are proposed or required.
Streets: The subject property is located along Barron Road, a four-lane
minor arterial on the Thoroughfare Plan. Hofburg Drive is not on
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 3 of 5
July 17, 2014
the thoroughfare plan but was constructed as a minor collector
with the Edelweiss Gartens subdivision. The subject tract will take
access to Barron Road via Crestmont Drive, a local street.
Based on the subject tract's General Suburban designation on the
Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map, UDO
Section 12-8.3.G requires that block length not exceed 1,200 feet.
Block length requirements are met along Barron Road with the
proposed Crestmont Drive, which is through street (not a cul-de-
sac). Block length measured along Hofburg Drive from William D.
Fitch Parkway to the next public street (Leyla Lane) measures
approximately 1,340 feet. The Preliminary Plan does not meet
block length requirements along Hofburg Drive which could be
accomplished if a street intersected Hofburg Drive at Lambermont
Drive or Noirmont Court.
Oversize Request: None request.
Parkland Dedication Fees: Parkland dedication fees totaling $37,830 (30 residential lots x
$1,261 per lot) will be due upon filling the final plat.
Impact Fees: This property is located within the Spring Creek Sanitary Sewer
Impact Fee area and will be assessed $144.01 per LUE.
REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance: The
subject property is designated as General Suburban on the Future Land Use and Character
Map of the Comprehensive Plan. The General Suburban designation calls for an intense
level of development activities that tend to consist of high-density single-family residential
lots with a minimum 5,000 square-foot lot size. The proposed Preliminary Plan complies with
the Comprehensive Plan and the Unified Development Ordinance requirements for
properties zoned GS General Suburban with the exception of the waiver to block length
requirements discussed below.
2. Compliance with Subdivision Regulations: The proposed Preliminary Plan is in
compliance with all requirements of the Subdivision Regulations contained in the Unified
Development Ordinance except the following waiver request;
• UDO Section 12-8.3.G 'Blocks' —The applicant is requesting a waiver to the 1,200-foot
maximum block length along Hofburg Drive. The existing block length along Hofburg
Drive between William D. Fitch Parkway and Leyla Lane exceeds the maximum by
approximately 140 feet.
In accordance with the Subdivision Regulations, when considering a waiver the Planning and
Zoning Commission should make the following findings to approve the waiver:
1) That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such
that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the
reasonable use of his land;
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 4 of 5
July 17, 2014
There is not a special circumstance where providing a street connection to Hofburg Drive
would deprive the applicant of reasonable use of their land.
2) That the waivers are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial
property right of the applicant;
The applicant has states the residences along Lambermont Drive and Crestmont Drive
expect a low traffic volume roadway and there should not be a connection to Hofburg Drive.
Providing a street connection that aligns with Noirmont Court would provide the required
connection but along a circuitous route such that through movements would be discouraged.
3) That the granting of the waivers will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering this
chapter; and
Granting the waiver will limit street connectivity beyond the minimum requirements of
ordinance and could be detrimental public health, safety, or welfare.
4) That the granting of the waivers will not have the effect of preventing the orderly
subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this
chapter.
Granting of the waiver would require the adjacent tract to the east to provide a connection to
Hofburg Drive or also seek a waiver to block length requirements.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends denial of the block length waiver along Hofburg Drive. If the Planning &
Zoning Commission approves the waiver, the Preliminary Plan would be in compliance with the
remaining Subdivision Regulations and Staff would recommend approval. If the waiver request
is denied, the Preliminary Plan must also be denied.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Application
2. Copy of Preliminary Plan
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 5 of 5
July 17, 2014
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO.:
_ DATE SUBMITTED:
CITY OP COLLEGE STATION TIME:
Home of Texas Ad-M University` STAFF:
PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
❑X $932 Preliminary Plan Application Fee.
X1 $233 Waiver Request to Subdivision Regulations Fee (if applicable).
0 Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used
and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
X❑ Six (6) folded copies of plan.A revised mylar original must be submitted after approval.
0 Title report for property current within ninety (90) days or accompanied by a Nothing Further Certificate
current within ninety (90) days. The report must include applicable information such as ownership, liens,
encumbrances, etc.
❑ Impact study (if oversized participation is requested).
X❑ The attached Preliminary Plan checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are
not.
Date of Optional Preapplication Conference
NAME OF PROJECT Barron Crest Subdivision
ADDRESS
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION:
!At the intersection of Barron Road and Fieldstone Place
L
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name Blake Cathey Traditions Montessord School E-mail blakecathey@yahoo.com traditionsmontessorri@gm
Street Address PO Box 9597 2668 Barron Road
City College Station State Tx Zip Code 77845
Phone Number 979-255-7064 979-229-5904 Fax Number
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (ALL owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple
owners):
Name Same as Applicant E-mail
Street Address
City _ State Zip Code
Phone Number Fax Number
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION.
Name McClure & Browne (Jeff Robertson) E-mail leffr@mcclurebrowne.com
Street Address 9008 Woodcreek
City College Station State Tx _Zip Code 77845
Phone Number 979-693-3838 Fax Number
Revised 4/14 Page 1 of 6
Total Acreage 9.89 Total No. of Lots 31 R-O-W Acreage 9.39
Number of Lots By Zoning District 39 i GS / /
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
.18 / GS
Floodplain Acreage 0
NOTE: Appropriate zoning for the proposed subdivision must be in place before this application can be
considered complete.
Are you proposing to dedicate park land by acreage or fee in lieu of land? Fee
Are you proposing to F- develop the park F- dedicate the development fee? (Check one)
This information is necessary to help staff identify the appropriate standards to review the application and will be used to
help determine if the application qualifies for vesting to a previous ordinance. Notwithstanding any assertion made,
vesting is limited to that which is provided in Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code or other applicable law.
Is this application a continuation of a project that has received prior City platting approval(s) and you are requesting the
application be reviewed under previous ordinance as applicable?
F- Yes
(— No
If yes, provide information regarding the first approved application and any related subsequent applications (provide
additional sheets if necessary):
Project Name
City Project Number(in known):
Dates frame when submitted.
Requested wavier to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable):
Block Length Waiver along Nofburg Drive. if a street is connected to.Nofburg Drive within the Barron Crest Subdivision,
it will cause Lambermont Drive in the Edelweiss Gartens subdivision and Crestmont Drive in the Barron Crest subdivision
unction as collector streets due to the curb cut on Barron Road. Neither Lambermont nor Crestmont are designed to
collector standards.
Revised 4114 Page 2 of 6
Regarding the waiver request, explain how:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the
subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land.
The location of the existing streets In this area
2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
In order for the exlstrng residences on Lambermont Drive and the proposed residences on Cre.st�r�ont Chive to
experience the expected low traffic volume roadway in front of their house, there should not be a connection to
ofburg Drive within the Barron Crest Subdivision
3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other
property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations.
There is adequate street connect/vity.within the surrounding neighborhoods to allow emergency services ru re Sf7nn,,�J
in a timely manner. Additionally, there are only 30 lots on the proposed access point within the Barron Crest
subdivision which is allowable by the International Fire Code.
4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in
accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance.
The proper#y to the north has already been developed. The properties to the east and west have access to Barron
Road and to other collector roadways that will allow adequate access points without needing the connection to
Hofburg Drive from the Barron Crest Subdivision
Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable):
I. r An alternative pedestrian way or multi-use path has been or will be provided outside the right-of-way;
2. F_ The presence of unique or unusual topographic, vegetative, or other natural conditions exist so that strict
adherence to the sidewalk requirements of the UDO is not physically feasible or is not in keeping with the
purposes and goals of the UDO or the City's comprehensive Plan;
3. F_ A capital improvement project is imminent that will include construction of the required sidewalk. Imminent shall
mean the project is funded or projected to commence within twelve (12) months;
4. F Existing streets constructed to rural section that are not identified on the Thoroughfare Plan with an estate/
rural context;
5. r' When a sidewalk is required along a street where a multi-use path is shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Master Plan;
Revised 4/14 Page 3 of 6
6. F The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and
Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the UDO; or
7. r The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway/Expressway as designated by Map 6.6,
Thoroughfare Plan-Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan,
Detailed explanation of condition identified above:
NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the
same time by the Planning &Zoning Commission.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached
hereto are true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE
OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from
the owner. If there is more than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney, If
the owner is a company, the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's
representative to sign the application on its behalf. LIEN HOLDERS identified in the title report are also
considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as described above.
11�L d d44— /—7
Signature and title Date
1/11 Page 4 of 6
6. r The proposed development is within an older residential subdivision meeting the criteria in Platting and
Replatting within Older Residential Subdivisions Section of the LIDO; or
7. r The proposed development contains frontage on a Freeway/Expressway as designated by Map 6.6,
Thoroughfare Plan-Functional Classification, in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Detailed explanation of condition identified above:
t
NOTE: A waiver to the sidewalk requirements and fee in lieu of sidewalk construction shall not be considered at the
same time by the Planning &Zoning Commission.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached
hereto are true, correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE
OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from
the owner. If there is more than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If
the owner is a company, the application must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's
representative to sign the application on its behalf. LIEN HOLDERS identified in the title report are also
considered owners and the appropriate signatures must be provided as described above.
Signatur and title Date
I
l
Revised 4114 Page 4 of 6
f
I
PRELIMINARY PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
Drawn on 24" x 36" sheet to scale of 100' per inch or larger. Include the words "PRELIMINARY PLAN -
NOT FOR RECORD" in letters 1/2" high. If more than 1 sheet, an index sheet showing entire subdivision
at a scale of 500 feet per inch or larger.
® Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in
relationship to College Station and its City Limits. No scale required but include north arrow.
Title Block with the following information:
❑X Name and address of subdivider, recorded owner, engineer and surveyor.
❑X Proposed name of subdivision (subdivision name & street names will be approved
through Brazos County 911).
FX Date of preparation (including the date the plat was submitted and the dates of any
revisions on the plat).
0 Engineer's scale in feet.
0 Total area intended to be developed.
❑X North Arrow
❑X Location of current city limit lines and current zoning district boundary. The appropriate zoning district(s)
must be in place for the proposed land uses before the application for a subdivision.
0 Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines. Boundary must include all of parent tract.
[]X Descriptions by metes and bounds of the subdivision which shall close within accepted land survey
standards. (Labeled on boundary lines, not separate metes and bounds description.)
Q Primary control points or descriptions and ties to such control point, to which , later, all dimensions,
angles, bearings, block numbers, and similar data shall be referred. The plat shall be located with
respect to a corner of the survey or tract, or an original corner of the original survey of which it is a part.
FX Name of contiguous subdivisions and names of owners of contiguous parcels of unsubdivided land, and
an indication whether or not contiguous properties are platted.
[] Location of the 100 Year Floodplain and Floodway, if applicable, according to the most recent available
data.
[]X Topographic information, including contours at two foot(2 ft.) intervals, wooded areas, and flowline
elevation of streams.
0 Proposed land uses (in compliance with existing zoning district)..
7 The location and description with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii, area,
center angle, degree of curvature, tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the following:
(Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a boundary with
the subdivision, as well as, those within the subdivision).
Revised 4/14 Page 5 of 6
Existing Proposed
XIX-1 Streets. Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac, stubbed out streets must end into a temp. turn
around unless they are shorter than 100 feet.
X❑ ❑X Public and private R.O.W. locations and widths. (All existing and proposed R.O.W.'s
sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan.)
❑ 0 Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance.
❑ ❑ Alleys.
❑ ❑ Well site locations.
❑ ❑ Pipelines. If carrying flammable gas or fuel, also show size of line, design pressure and product
transported through the line.
❑X 0 Utility services (water & sanitary sewer). All existing and proposed utilities of sufficient
size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas.
0 [xl Easements.
® jx Drainage structures and improvements including underground storm sewer and all overland
systems (flow line of existing watercourses) and showing where these will discharge. Proposed
channel cross sections, if any.
X❑ ❑X A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block(numbered sequentially).
❑ ❑ Parkland dedication/greenbelt area/park linkages. All proposed dedications must be reviewed
by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and documentation of their recommendation
provided prior to being scheduled for P&Z Commission consideration.
❑ ❑ Greenways dedication.
❑X 0 Public areas.
0 0 Other public improvements, including but not limited to parks, schools and other public
facilities.
❑ Proposed phasing. Each phase must be able to stand alone to meet ordinance requirements and
infrastructure costs shown to be distributed evenly throughout the subdivision. Phases must be final
platted in sequential order as shown or defined on the preliminary plan.
❑X Are there impact fees associated with this development? FX_1 Yes No
Revised 4/14 Print Form Page 6 of 6
2Ill LLQ
Er
66
VP-
;2!p
Rig
AR
j
'N 2 In
nj= 4 g� —'t6
ns,
IL
— — — — — — — — — — —
— — - — — — — — — — — — — —
------------
------------------------
-------------
Jrlli iii i1 t
PH
-------------------
-------------
---—--—--—-- esu---- ------
j L
P,
eq
I ,5k
(*tl""
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Home of Texas AerM University®
REZONING REQUEST
FOR
2315 & 2317 TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH
14-00900144
REQUEST: GC General Commercial and R-4 Multi-Family to R-4 Multi-Family
SCALE: 2.615 acres
LOCATION: 2315 & 2317 Texas Avenue South
Herman F. Krenek Subdivision Phase Two Lot 5B and a 0.752-
acre tract described as Tract 1 and 0.393-acre tract described as
Tract 2 by a deed to Sylvia H. Robinson recorded in volume 9511,
page 270 of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas
APPLICANT: Caleb Venable
PROJECT MANAGER: Jason Schubert, AICP, Principal Planner
jschubert@cstx.gov
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request.
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 1 of 5
July 17, 2014
z
ivy
• PJga� �T�-f
ct
YJ �
4jt
❑ 9
k
o
w
Op
x r
r �
4� w
W
fr
a
r p W
r s W
r re
P
• "! + LU
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 2 of 5
July 17, 2014
�V
1 N sf l4 7 °9-E Z
o LO co rqrj Do
U «2 2 Z
Z N M1 3l� / a d x❑ N
m (N ry �S*r OL QS °o day. / L d M z z`m 00 W
-G 'wao_ 7E
N NLo
NZpma �x
cq
cy
LD D L3 I I 4
N d zzzoQfd
N
CF+ q,M all,
cqW
00 CA E
Ln
Lo
/k9 A wv Ivo
3_N
�nn y CL"U W'E
a N 3 C %
N '"N Q71 tl r"I072mcn
w m.as of a m m W
d
CV .♦/ ¢ V C6¢ I I I A etl� Q
LLI
a dS
` -
❑ E .ca N
ism ways
° any E, cUE`
06 n
Mm1� ay V, xj
m¢ Sym s L1 [n [CSO nUUm w
<' W
v r�
omC, w p
i J
LO N N M F< N N ii W
w
N °�° t'n p' 0
N
w iK li
CE(D fnpF
❑
N �7'II
J � O
��jj L7 m
N' R'W CY R' F
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 3 of 5
July 17, 2014
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: July 17, 2014
Advertised Council Hearing Dates: August 14, 2014
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station's
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
None
Property owner notices mailed: 22
Contacts in support: None at the time of staff report.
Contacts in opposition: None at the time of staff report though one inquiry has
expressed concern about the amount of traffic and
maintenance responsibilities of the cross access
easement.
Inquiry contacts: Two
ADJACENT LAND USES
Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use
North General Commercial GC General Commercial Vacant
South General Commercial GC General Commercial Offices
East Urban R-4 Multi-Family Duplexes and fourplexes
West General Commercial GC General Commercial Hotel and vacant
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexation: 1969
Zoning: R-5 Apartments/Medium Density (1984), consolidated with R-4
Multi-Family (2003)
C-1 General Commercial (1985), renamed GC General
Commercial (2012)
Final Plat: Kirkpatrick (1981); Herman F. Krenek Ph 2 (1984), portion
replatted (2004)
Site development: Part vacant, part single-family home with accessory structures.
REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject property is at the edge of an
area designated General Commercial on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and
Character Map and is located adjacent to an area designated as Urban. As the Future Land
Use and Character Map is not parcel based, the General Commercial/Urban boundary is not
a fixed line. The Urban designation is described as areas for very intense level of
development activities and will tend to consist of townhomes, duplexes, and high-density
apartments. For this request, these properties are considered as part of the Urban
designated area and therefore a request for multi-family can be considered.
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 4 of 5
July 17, 2014
2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and
with the character of the neighborhood: The subject property is located in an area
mostly zoned and developed for commercial uses that is adjacent to multi-family
development. Commercial and multi-family zoning are commonly located in proximity to one
another and multi-family serves as a transition area away from more intense commercial
areas. The proposed zoning is compatible with the present zoning in that it will move the
commercial/multi-family development boundary by enlarging the multi-family area.
3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The subject
property is suitable for the proposed R-4 Multi-Family in that it will locate multi-family near
the core of the City where additional dwellings can be served by existing infrastructure. The
subject property accesses public streets through private access easements over
neighboring commercial property which is not common access for multi-family
developments.
4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The subject
property is located at the rear of a commercially developed area. Access to Texas Avenue
and Brentwood Drive via private access easements increases the commercial potential for
the property, though it is not visible from the surrounding streets as other property has
already developed in front of it. The property could be suitable for commercial uses that are
more destination in nature where visibility from a street is not an important factor.
5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the
district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: Generally
there is not a trend to rezone property from commercial to multi-family use. As the last
property to develop, the lack of visibility limits the marketability of this property and the
applicant states "there is ample commercial land available in College Station and current
buildings for sale that businesses would choose over this location because of its access."
6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally
suitable and adequate for the proposed use: There are existing 6- and 8-inch water
mains available to serve this property. There is also an existing 6-inch sanitary sewer main
on this tract. Drainage is mainly to the south within the Bee Creek Drainage Basin. Access
to the site will be available via private access easements connecting to Texas Avenue South
and Brentwood Drive. Drainage and other public infrastructure required with site
development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design
Guidelines. Existing infrastructure appears to be adequate for the proposed use.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request.
SUPPORTING MATERIALS
1. Application
2. Rezoning map
Planning &Zoning Commission Page 5 of 5
July 17, 2014
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CASE NO. t
DATE SUBMITTED: 4 I'4
CITY Or, COLLEGE-STATION TIME: U "_3(;
Home of Texas AdM University' STAFF: 3
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING) APPLICATION
GENERAL
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
❑ $1,165 Rezoning Application Fee. — C-4Y haS _g,;l -�-o 4 Co. leelte-r;-,c Art,
❑ Application completed in full. This application form provided by the City of College Station must be used
and may not be adjusted or altered. Please attach pages if additional information is provided.
❑ Traffic Impact Analysis or calculations of projected vehicle trips showing that a TIA is not necessary for
the proposed request.
❑ One (1) copy of a fully dimensioned map on 24" x 36" paper showing:
a. Land affected;
b. Legal description of area of proposed change;
c. Present zoning;
d. Zoning classification of all abutting land; and
e. All public and private rights-of-way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land.
❑ Written legal description of subject property (metes & bounds or lot & block of subdivision, whichever is
applicable).
❑ A CAD (dxf/dwg) - model space State Plane NAD 83 or GIS (shp) digital file (e-mailed to
P&DS_Digital_Submittal@cstx.gov).
NOTE: If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shall not be filed
within a period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with permission of the Planning & Zoning Commission.
Date of Optional Preapplication Conference
NAME OF PROJECT Z3 t r d' 231"7 'T--ILA-,.r Avc• Sntti
ADDRESS Z31.5-4- z31-7 Tis At-t- 5- _*-
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Lot, Block, Subdivision) Lof S'f /kr K< e-eA Z ,I- T✓u.d' I yZ
GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPERTY, IF NOT PLATTED: k�I�Prtidr��k s' d,vYrd,�
TOTAL ACREAGE
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary contact for the project):
Name E-mail caltlovevic�lote w�a,l.coN,
Street Address 31Al- Urt x,a
City Zip Code 7-7 Sa3
Phone Number T 9 —7 03— 6 17 q Fax Number
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name E-mail
Street Address
City State Zip Code
Phone Number Fax Number
10/10 Page 1 of 3
OTHER CONTACTS (Please specify type of contact, i.e. project manager, potential buyer, local contact, etc.):
Name Som 5ut. #�z G;v;I CV. ;wee✓ q�n p'-oi-, E-mail do�e5c,l,. 4 84 0ve-f--2-0 net
Street Address '-1 30
City ca State Zip Code -7-7945
Phone Number 79 - 6 Fax Number
This property was conveyed to owner by deed dated 12--09 -03 and recorded in Volume 711 Page '-771
of the Brazos County Official Records.
Existing Zoning ,�je��� G,�,, - Proposed Zoning (Avb,c,,, y
Present Use of Property XiK��[ T=ar ,�;t5� a,.,al V:I.Ca-J— /&--4
Proposed Use of Property 3 s:Fort' �� , ,h �✓:�L ��. o�-, 'ao r �T I►ows e 7c-
V
REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION
i. List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary.
The rental market is outpacing the commercial demand. There is vacant land and available buildings in this central
College Station area for commercial businesses to locate. However, the single family and multi-family buildings in
this area are 100%leased for residential purposes.
2. Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the
Plan is incorrect.
This zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan as the tracts abut Urban Land Use. Chapter Two
of the city of College Station's Comprehensive Plan states that 3000 to 4000 acres of land is needed for
development or redevelopment in order to house the population demand. By utilizing land in the hear`of College
Station it allows for more of a sustainable and walk able community than developing land in commuter locations.
3_ How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with
the character of the neighborhood?
This proposed zone change will match the adjacent existing multifamily property and will be compatible with the
adjacent commercial uses.
10/10 Page 2 of 3
4. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested
Chapter two of the Comprehensive Plan also states that College Station population is estimated to increase by
40,000 by the year 2030. In an effort to accommodate the demand for housing and to keep it more centrally
located in the City. This property is in a great location to accomplish this goal.
5. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
Commercial businesses want to have street frontage. This property does not lend itself to being a desirable
location for business because of the lack of visibility
6. Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
There is amble commercial land available in College Station and current buildings for sale that businesses would
choose over this location because of its access.
7. List any other reasons to support this zone change.
The request is in accordance with Chapter 2 of the comprehensive plan. In order to create a more green
environment and meet the demand for housing.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,
correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more
than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf.
Signature and title Date
10/10 Print Form Page 3 of 3
PROPERTY OWNS `5 INFORMATI(7
Name y - E-mail 1 ASS Ll Yip
Street Address _ � �1� Ave—
{�U
City AC `� State _ Zip Code
Phone Number _ _ - sk '_ Fax Number
ANSWER ALL OF THE FOLLOWING:
1.What specific element of the Comprehensive Plan(for example, Land Use and Character deslgnatlon, Thoroughfare
Plan Context Class, or thoroughfare alignment) and at what specific location (if applicable) Is requested to be
amended?
2.What Is the amendment request?
3. Explain the reason for this amendment.
4. Identify the conditions that have changed to warrant this change to the existing Comprehensive Plan,
5. Explain why the existing element of the Comprehensive Plan in question is no longer appropriate.
6. How does the requested amendment further the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan?
10/10 Page 2 of 3
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name .- >�e-` t`, —�uG�r� rx-�f �~ t bV E-mail _ CziC oLC �C� . a{, }J' r5 n
Street Address ? + L p 4 - -P c- R
city ri'f State _6!1_'� Zip Code
Phone Number �I ' �,� ��r rl c�, '4> Fax Number _/y/A
ANSWER ALL OF THE FOLLOWING:
1. What speck element of the Comprehensive Plan(for example, Land Use and Character designation, Thoroughfare
Plan Context Class, or thoroughfare alignment) and at what specific location (if applicable) is requested to be
amended?
2_What is the amendment request?
i
3. Explain the reason for this amendment,
I
d. Identify the conditions that have changed to warrant this change to the existing Comprehensive Plan-
s. Explain why the existing element of the Comprehensive Plan in question is no longer appropriate.
6, How does the requested amendment further the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan?
10110 Page 2 of 3
4. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested
5. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
6. Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
7. List any other reasons to support this zone change.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,
correct, and complete. IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more
than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the appfi an on its behalf
ignature it Date
10110 Print Form Page 3 of 3
4. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested.
5 Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
6- Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
7. List any other reasons to support this zone change.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,
correct, and complete, IF THIS APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE
PROPERTY, this application must be accompanied by a power of attorney statement from the owner. If there is more
than one owner, all owners must sign the application or the power of attorney. If the owner is a company, the application
must be accompanied by proof of authority for the company's representative to sign the application on its behalf.
Signature and title Date
10110 Print FOrm Page 3 of 3
S g—
(w> .aa�
Lij
J J N Wa o yz
1 m M c v�z c n„eve
N N _
swag���tiaoo
dp0�
F$ �S�'HJ NWS
5 wouswwers NWNPtl S d�o �o ” � I
-n.mwoz 5
sar'✓med lne
g" xo woens asro'N�w
j
s .
ac oQ" Ir - _ O
� -� � I
m so I =g o
���
e �m Uf
magas
I
II i I
II I I
Ij I I
I i
I �
II
I 1 I
i
i
I "
Hunos �m3AV svx=i I