Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
08/17/2026 - Regular Agenda Packet - Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board
College Station, TX Meeting Agenda Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, TX 77840 Internet:www.microsoft.com/microsoft-teams/join-a-meeting Meeting ID: 283 217 264 064 007 | Passcode: 6aW3aA9z Phone: +1 979-431-4880 | Phone Conference: 355 683 545# The City Council may or may not attend this meeting. August 17, 2026 3:30 PM Bush 4141 Community Room College Station, TX Page 1 Notice is hereby given that a quorum of the meeting body will be present in the physical location stated above where citizens may also attend in order to view a member(s) participating by videoconference call as allowed by 551.127, Texas Government Code. The City uses a third party vendor to host the virtual portion of the meeting; if virtual access is unavailable, meeting access and participation will be in-person only. 1. Call meeting to order and consider absence requests. 2. Hear Visitors. At this time, the Chairperson will open the floor to citizens wishing to address issues not already scheduled on today's agenda. Each citizen’s presentation will be limited to three minutes in order to allow adequate time for the completion of the agenda items. Comments will be received and city staff may be asked to look into the matter, or the matter may be placed on a future agenda for discussion. A recording may be made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record. 3. Agenda Items. 3.1. Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes. Attachments: 1. July 20 2026 Minutes 3.2. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an Ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan by amending the Thoroughfare Plan and the Active Transportation Master Plan for the proposed Savannah Oaks Subdivision in south College Station, to realign four thoroughfares, reclassify two thoroughfares, remove a future bicycle pedestrian grade separated crossing, realign the future Alum Creek shared use path, and modify future bike lanes and sidewalks to shared use paths. Case #CPA2026-000008 Sponsors: Jesse DiMeolo Attachments: 1. Thoroughfare Plan Amendment Exhibit 2. Bicycle Plan Amendment Exhibit 3. Pedestrian Plan Amendment Exhibit 4. Applicants Supporting Information 3.3. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the implementation of a walk and bike audit program. Sponsors: Carl Ahrens Attachments: 1. Walk Audit Form 2. Bike Audit Form Page 1 of 39 Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board Page 2 August 17, 2026 3.4. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the development of a fall community bike ride. Sponsors: Carl Ahrens 3.5. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an update to the status of unfunded standalone sidewalk, shared use path, and bike lane projects. Sponsors: Jesse DiMeolo Attachments: 1. Sidewalks Priorities List 2. Shared Use Paths - Along Street Priorities List 3. Shared Use Paths - Off-Street Priorities List 4. Bike Lanes-Bike Facility Priorities List 3.6. Presentation and discussion regarding the following items related to biking, walking, and greenways. a. Public Meetings of Interest b. Capital and Private Updates 3.7. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board calendar of upcoming meetings. • September 14, 2026 ~ Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board Meeting ~ 3:30 p.m. ~ Bush 4141 Community Room 4. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items. A member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 5. Adjourn. Adjournment into Executive Session may occur in order to consider any item listed on the agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion. I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the website and at College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on August 10, 2026 at 5:00 p.m. City Secretary This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters, readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations. Page 2 of 39 Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board Page 3 August 17, 2026 Page 3 of 39 MINUTES BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, AND GREENWAYS ADVISORY BOARD MEETING July 20, 2026 MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Scott Shafer, Carla Robinson, Thomas Woodfin, Neo Jang, Matthew Jackson, and Kathy Langlotz MEMBERS ABSENT: Joy Chmelar STAFF PRESENT: Assistant Director of Planning and Development Services Molly Hitchcock, Public Works Graduate Engineer Deanna Ordoñez, Transportation Planning Administrator Jason Schubert, Senior Planner Jesse DiMeolo, Staff Planner Carl Ahrens, and Board Secretary Grecia Fuentes AGENDA ITEM NO. 1: Call to Order, introductions and consider absence requests. Chairperson Shafer called the meeting to order at 3:31 p.m. AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Hear Visitors. Robert Rose, College Station resident in Crescent Pointe, talked about a situation that claimed the life of a cyclist in a fatal accident with a vehicle this past weekend in Brazos County. He suggested the Board make a motion to consider a response to this event and draft a resolution asking our state leadership to make a legislation named after Hannah Rapp. AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Agenda Items. AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.1: Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes. Board Member Woodfin motioned to approve the meeting minutes from May 11th. Board Member Robinson seconded the motion, the minutes were approved 5-0. AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.2: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Chapter 2 “Administration,” Article I “In General,” Section 2-3 “City Boards, Commissions, and Committees,” and Appendix A, “Unified Development Ordinance,” Article 2 “Development Review Bodies,” Sections 2.1.B.1 “Appointments” and 2.6 “Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board,” Article 3 Page 4 of 39 “Development Review Procedures,” Section 3.5.C “Concept Plan Approval Process,” Article 8 “Subdivision Design and Improvements,” Sections 8.3.K.2 “Required Sidewalks,” 8.3.K.3 “Sidewalk Exceptions,” 8.3.L.2 “Timing,” 8.3.V.1 “General Requirements,” and 8.4.T “Private Streets and Gating of Roadways,” and Article 11 “Definitions,” Section 11.2 “Defined Terms” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by amending certain sections related to the name, membership, and duties of the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board and references to the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan. Case #ORDA2026-000010 (Note: This item will be considered at the August 6, 2026 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting with final action considered at the August 27, 2026 City Council meeting ~ Subject to change). Senior Planner DiMeolo presented changes to Unified Development Ordinance due to the new Active Transportation Master Plan. Board Member Woodfin asked for clarification on what the program management added language referred to. Planner DiMeolo clarified that it included but was not limited to programs such as health and safety, education, encouragement, and special events. The Board agreed to change the language to “event and program management”. Board Member Jang joined the meeting at 3:52 p.m. Board Member Robinson asked for the reason for removing the reviewing of plats and site plans listed under Section 2.6 D.1c. on Powers and Duties. Administrator Schubert said that the change was to reflect how development applications are processed as city staff provide a technical review within a two-week period and the Board only meets monthly so would not be able to complete that in a timely manner. He added that staff bring regular updates of projects of note and informs the Board of upcoming meetings for capital projects done by the City so the Board could have more involvement in the development of those. Assistant Director Hitchcock added that some development applications must be approved within a certain timeframe otherwise they get approved automatically. She said that staff was trying to focus the input of the Board where there could be a greater impact. Board Member Robinson motioned to recommend the approval of the changes to the Unified Development Ordinance including the specific language change for “event and program management.” Board Member Woodfin seconded the motion. Motion was approved 6-0. AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.3: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an Ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan by amending the Thoroughfare Plan and Active Transportation Master Plan to remove the future extension of Corporate Parkway, a Major Collector, between Midtown Drive and William D. Fitch Parkway Page 5 of 39 including associated future bike lanes and sidewalks along with the realignment of the future Spring Creek trail to the existing Lick Creek trail. Case #CPA2026-000010 (Note: This item is tentatively scheduled for the August 6, 2026 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting with final action tentatively scheduled for the August 27, 2026 City Council meeting ~ Subject to change). Administrator Schubert presented the changes to the Comprehensive Plan to the Board by recommending the removal of the future extension of Corporate Parkway and related changes. Chairperson Shafer asked if as the city developed infrastructure in that area if there would be bike and pedestrian facilities built with capital improvement projects. Administration Schubert said that the design being developed by the City is there are streets that will be built within the development that are planned to have shared-use paths on both sides and the existing Lick Creek trail and future Spring Creek trail would remain. Chairperson Shafer shared his and the committee’s concern for a reasonable buffer from the existing Lick Creek trail and reasonable connectivity for people traveling through the area of the park to the ballfields. Board Member Woodfin raised concern about drainage from the ballfields near the trail. Chairperson Shafer asked staff, if possible, for the Board to look at the plans and discuss them to have their recommendations to City Council. Administrator Schubert said that ultimately City Council will make the decision on the details like if there is a required buffer from the Lick Creek trail and other details. Chairperson Shafer opened the Public Hearing. Robert Rose, resident of Crescent Pointe, shared a concern on how people would travel through the park and how it will affect the active transportation users since the trail would be taking them around the park and not through it. Chairperson Shafer closed the Public Hearing. Board Member Woodfin moved to recommend approval of the amendment of the Thoroughfare Plan and Active Transportation Master Plan. Board Member Jang seconded the motion. Motion was approved 6-0. AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.4: Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the development of a fall community bike ride. Staff Planner Ahrens presented a fall bike ride proposed for Saturday, October 10th. The route will start at City Hall, go to Midtown Park in Bryan where the local Farmer’s Market will be held, and return to City Hall. Chairperson Shafer asked to share details on the grant. Page 6 of 39 Chuck Martinez, Board Secretary of Bryan College Station Sister Cities Association, spoke about the mission of this association to be able to facilitate cultural understanding, education, relationships and technical and economic development exchange and the development of the grant. Board Member Jang asked if there would be some kind of protection for participants along the route. Planner Ahrens said that each city would be working through it to review any street closures, police escorts or C-STEP Team helping block intersections. More details will be provided at upcoming meetings as they are available. AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.5: Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the implementation of a walk and bike audit program The Board agreed to postpone this item to August Board meeting. AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.6: Presentation and discussion regarding the following items related to biking, walking, and greenways. a) Public Meetings of Interest – • Administrator Schubert said the Harvey District Plan had its kick-off meeting on June 23rd and the planning effort will include bicycle and pedestrian feasibility study of select corridors as done last year that will be brought to the Board at a future meeting. • Board Member Jang said there will be a candlelight vigil for Hannah Rapp on Wednesday, July 22nd at 8:30pm at the Bryan Box Gym. • Board Member Langlotz stated that Hannah’s funeral was scheduled for the afternoon of Thursday, July 23rd. b) Capital and Private Project Updates – • Administrator Schubert said CDBG is funding the construction of sidewalks on Welsh Avenue down to Nevada Street and that the design is currently at 90%. AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.7: Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board calendar of upcoming meetings. a) August 17, 2026 ~ Bicycle, Pedestrian and Greenways Advisory Board Meeting AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Discussion and possible action on future agenda items. A Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Advisory Board Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. Chairperson Shafer asked to follow up on the crossing at Southwest Parkway and Lemon tree and Bee Creek Trail. He asked the Board to think about how to use activated signage to make motorized more aware of these crossings. Page 7 of 39 Board Member Woodfin shared a map from Madison Wisconsin Dane County bike map. The map is labeled at levels of Most Comfortable, Somewhat Comfortable and Least Comfortable. Board Member Jang shared his experience with the new raised crossings on Welsh Avenue at A&M Consolidated High School. He mentioned that the elevation was subtle and what could be done of the depth of these midblock crossings. Board Member Jackson stated an issue on Eagle Ave he has experienced where there is not a pedestrian ramp on the opposite side of the street to cross and get on the sidewalk. AGENDA ITEM NO. 5: Adjourn The meeting adjourned at 5:07 p.m. APPROVED: ATTEST: ____________________________ ____________________________ Scott Shafer, Chairperson Grecia Fuentes, Board Secretary Page 8 of 39 August 17, 2026 Item No. 3.2. Savannah Oaks Thoroughfare Plan and Active Transportation Master Plan Amendments Sponsor: Jesse DiMeolo Reviewed By CBC: Bicycle, Pedestrian, & Greenways Advisory Board Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an Ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan by amending the Thoroughfare Plan and the Active Transportation Master Plan for the proposed Savannah Oaks Subdivision in south College Station, to realign four thoroughfares, reclassify two thoroughfares, remove a future bicycle pedestrian grade separated crossing, realign the future Alum Creek shared use path, and modify future bike lanes and sidewalks to shared use paths. Case #CPA2026-000008 Relationship to Strategic Goals: Improving Mobility Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of the request. Summary: The Savannah Oaks property is an approximately 1,266-acre tract located along State Highway 6 between the Pebble Creek and Southern Pointe developments. The applicant is requesting amendments to the City's Thoroughfare Plan to modify several planned roadway alignments and classifications within and adjacent to the property. At a broad level, the proposed changes to the Thoroughfare Plan include realigning a future minor arterial and two future major collectors and reclassifying a future major collector to a minor collector and a future minor collector to a major collector. The requested amendments to the Active Transportation Master Plan include removing a future bicycle/pedestrian grade separation of future Lakeway Drive, converting future bike lanes and sidewalks into future shared use paths along all thoroughfares within the development, and modifying the alignment and extent of the future Alum Creek shared use path. The location of each specific change is identified in the attached exhibits. The proposed amendments are being considered in conjunction with a request to rezone the property to a Planned Development District (PDD), which is currently under review. Together, these requests would establish a revised framework for the future development of the Savannah Oaks property and the surrounding transportation network as the area continues to grow and develop. REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Changed or changing conditions in the subject area of the City: The subject property and many of the properties to the north, east, and south are designated as Suburban Residential and Natural & Open Areas. The Suburban Residential land use designation is generally for areas that are appropriate for single-family residential areas that consist of low to moderate density single-family lots. Properties to the west along State Highway 6 are designated as General Commercial. This designation is for areas of commercial activities that cater to both nearby residents and to the larger community or region. Generally, these areas tend to be large and located along regionally significant roads. Due to their context, these areas tend to prioritize automobile mobility. Since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan and subsequent updates to the Thoroughfare Plan and Active Transportation Master Plan, development activity in southeast College Station has Page 9 of 39 changed. As a result, the planned transportation network can be refined to better reflect existing development patterns, property boundaries, environmental constraints, anticipated travel demand, and access needs. The proposed amendments update the functional classification and alignment of several planned roadways and modify the alignment and extent of the future Alum Creek trail to better connect the area while at the same time protecting an environmentally sensitive watershed. 2. Compatibility with the existing uses, development patterns, and character of the immediate area concerned, the general area, and the City as a whole: The City's Thoroughfare Plan and Active Transportation Master Plan include numerous planned roadway and active transportation facilities traversing this approximately 1,200-acre tract, making this Comprehensive Plan amendment request more extensive and involved. The subject tract is currently known as the future Savannah Oaks development and is located within a developing area of southeast College Station where large master-planned developments, including Southern Pointe and Pebble Creek, are shaping the future transportation network. As development has progressed, the locations of utility corridors, environmental features, property boundaries, and planned access points have become more defined, allowing for refinement of the City's long-range transportation plans within the development. The proposed amendment modifies the alignment and functional classification of several planned roadways and active transportation facilities to better coordinate with the proposed development pattern and existing site constraints. The amendments continue to provide multimodal connectivity throughout the area while improving the relationship between the transportation network and adjacent land uses. Overall, the proposed changes are compatible with the evolving development pattern of the immediate area and support the orderly expansion of the City's transportation network as development occurs. 3. Impact on environmentally sensitive and natural areas: A significant portion of the Savannah Oaks property is designated as Natural and Open Areas in the City's Comprehensive Plan and contains environmentally sensitive features associated with the Alum Creek tributary and its adjacent floodplain. As part of the associated Planned Development District (PDD) rezoning request, the City's Parks and Recreation Department is continuing to evaluate which portions of these areas will ultimately be accepted as parkland dedication. Consequently, the final extent and configuration of publicly dedicated open space has not yet been determined. The proposed amendment provides flexibility for the future active transportation network to respond to these environmental features while preserving connectivity throughout the site. Rather than establishing a fixed alignment through the floodplain at this stage, the amendment allows the shared use path to generally follow the Alum Creek corridor, with the final alignment to be determined during the Preliminary Plan process once parkland dedication, drainage improvements, and environmental constraints have been finalized. This approach allows the trail to be designed in coordination with the ultimate park configuration while minimizing impacts on environmentally sensitive areas and maintaining the City's long-term active transportation objectives. 4. Impacts on infrastructure including water, wastewater, drainage, and the transportation network: Water and wastewater services will be provided by the City of College Station. The subject property is in the Alum Creek Drainage Basin and drains to Tributaries 2 & 4 of Alum Creek as well as to Alum Creek directly. Drainage and any other infrastructure required for site development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design Guidelines. Page 10 of 39 The subject property has frontage to State Highway 6 South, which is designated as a Freeway/Expressway on the City’s Thoroughfare Plan. Several other thoroughfares are planned to be stubbed to the subject tract. They are as follows: • Lakeway Drive (from the north) • Mather Parkway (from Southern Pointe to the south) • Southern Pointe Parkway (from Southern Pointe to the west) • Pipeline Road (from the south) • Two pairs of Minor Arterial and Minor Collector roadways (from the east in the ETJ) A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was submitted in support of the associated PDD rezoning request and will be discussed with the rezoning staff report. In the attached “Thoroughfare Plan” exhibit, callout item #3 shows the proposed reclassification of the north-south roadway from a major collector to a minor collector and is the amendment most directly supported by the TIA. The analysis projects approximately 2,750 average daily trips (ADT) on this roadway in the future. Based on this projected traffic volume, the applicant states that a two-lane minor collector, consistent with the Bryan-College Station Unified Design Guidelines, is sufficient to accommodate the anticipated traffic demand. 5. Consistency with the goals and strategies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan: The proposed amendment remains consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's vision of providing a safe, connected, and context-sensitive multimodal transportation network while allowing the City's long-range transportation plans to evolve as development occurs. The amendment refines the planned roadway and active transportation network to better reflect existing site conditions, environmental features, projected travel demand, and the proposed development pattern for Savannah Oaks. The proposed changes support Comprehensive Plan Strategic Action 6.1 by promoting context- sensitive transportation planning and Strategic Action 5.14, which prioritizes connections between parks, greenways, community facilities, and other destinations as identified in both the Active Transportation Master Plan and the Parks Master Plan. While the amendment modifies the alignment of the proposed shared use path, it maintains the intent of these plans by preserving multimodal connectivity while allowing the final trail alignment to be coordinated with future parkland dedication, environmental features, and the Preliminary Plan process. Although the amendment modifies the location and functional classification of several planned transportation facilities, the overall objective of providing a connected multimodal transportation system is maintained. Budget & Financial Summary: Attachments: 1. Thoroughfare Plan Amendment Exhibit 2. Bicycle Plan Amendment Exhibit 3. Pedestrian Plan Amendment Exhibit 4. Applicants Supporting Information Page 11 of 39 Page 12 of 39 Page 13 of 39 Page 14 of 39 COMP PLAN APPLICATION SUPPORTING INFORMATION Updated 6/26/2026 Name of Project: ROADWAY AND SHARED USE PATH CHANGES (CPA2026-000008) Address: N/A Legal Description: A021001, S D SMITH (ICL), TRACT 21, 1265.851 ACRES, & A020201 SW ROBERTSON Total Acreage: 1266 Applicant: SILVERFIN LAND DEVELOPMENT LLC Property Owner: SILVERFIN CS LAND LLC What element of the Comprehensive Plan and at what location is requested to be amended? As demonstrated on the attached exhibits, the alignment of shared use paths and the alignment of the road network within Savannah Oaks. What is the amendment requested? The alignment of shared use paths and the alignment of the road network within Savannah Oaks What is the reason for the amendment? The current alignment has signiflcant impact on the development potential for the property. The proposed realignment improves connectivity, reduces confiict points between pedestrians/cyclists and vehicular traffic, and refiects the proposed development conditions while increasing the commercial and residential offerings. In addition, the proposed alignment strategically utilizes existing pipeline corridors and natural topography creating more efficient and functional land use. By incorporating these existing constraints and natural features into the overall planning framework, the development is able to maximize usable acreage, improve site circulation, reduce grading impacts, and support a more cohesive integration of residential, commercial and open space areas. Page 15 of 39 How will this change be compatible with the existing uses, development patterns, and character of the immediate area concerned, the general area, and the city as a whole? The broader context within the subject area of the City refiects ongoing growth and development pressures, along with a continued emphasis on aligning infrastructure with current and anticipated land-use patterns. As surrounding areas continue to develop, there is an increasing need for roadway and pedestrian networks that support efficient traffic distribution, phased development, and improved multimodal connectivity. The revised Savannah Oaks alignment responds to these evolving conditions by better integrating transportation infrastructure with existing easements, topography, and planned development in the area. In contrast, the removal of the Pebble Creek Parkway connection creates a signiflcant gap in the planned east– west roadway network, eliminating a key element of continuity intended to support regional circulation. This change alters the intended function of the overall roadway system and reduces the effectiveness of the broader network by limiting planned connectivity and interdependence between internal and external routes. As a result, the roadway system would not operate as originally envisioned in the approved framework, reinforcing the need to reevaluate and adjust the alignment to ensure the network functions as intended. Given the improved efficiency, development coordination, and mobility beneflts provided by the revised Savannah Oaks alignments, and the substantial adverse impacts associated with removing the Pebble Creek Parkway connection, a Comprehensive Plan amendment is warranted to formally adopt the proposed roadway and shared-use path network revisions. Explain the impact on environmentally sensitive and natural areas and infrastructure, including water, wastewater, drainage and transportation network. The revised alignments maintain the intended function of the shared use paths while better integrating with surrounding land uses and existing development patterns. The proposed road network changes better align with current and future roadway access for adjacent properties and remain consistent with the scale and character of Savannah Oaks and the surrounding area of the College Station. In addition, the proposed alignment strategically utilizes existing pipeline corridors and responds to the natural topography of the site to create more efficient and functional land use patterns. By incorporating these existing constraints and natural features into the overall planning framework, the development can maximize usable acreage, improve site circulation, reduce grading impacts, and support cohesive integration between residential, commercial, open space elements. The modiflcations also provide appropriate transitions between land uses, reinforce planned connectivity throughout the area, and support coordinated infrastructure placement. Overall, the proposed changes are compatible with the character and development patterns of the immediate Page 16 of 39 area and further the broader planning objectives of the City by promoting orderly growth, efficient infrastructure, and thoughtful site design. Explain how this change will be consistent with the goals and strategies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. The revised alignments maintain the intended function of the shared use paths while better integrating with surrounding land uses and existing development patterns. The proposed road network changes better align with current and future roadway access for adjacent properties and remain consistent with the scale and character of Savannah Oaks and the surrounding area of the College Station. In addition, the proposed alignment strategically utilizes existing pipeline corridors and responds to the natural topography of the site to create more efficient and functional land use patterns. By incorporating these existing constraints and natural features into the overall planning framework, the development can maximize usable acreage, improve site circulation, reduce grading impacts, and support cohesive integration between land uses. The modiflcations also provide appropriate transitions between land uses, reinforce planned connectivity throughout the area, and support coordinated infrastructure placement. Overall, the proposed changes are compatible with the character and development patterns of the immediate area and further the broader planning objectives of the City by promoting orderly growth, efficient infrastructure, and thoughtful site design. Environmental Impact The proposed roadway and shared-use path modiflcations are intended to minimize impacts to environmentally sensitive areas while maintaining the overall connectivity objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The revised shared-use path alignment avoids portions of the site characterized by signiflcant topographic variation, mature-wooded areas, and other environmental constraints. Construction of the originally planned alignment would require substantial clearing, grading, drainage improvements, and long-term maintenance activities within areas containing natural environmental features. By relocating portions of the shared-use path to the Savannah Oaks Boulevard corridor and utilizing planned transportation infrastructure corridors, the amendment substantially reduces disturbance to existing vegetation, preserves larger contiguous natural open space areas, and minimizes encroachment into environmentally sensitive portions of the site. The amendment also removes the previously contemplated shared-use path extension between Lakeway Drive and the Highway 6 frontage road. The original alignment would require the path to traverse areas constrained by Alum Creek, challenging topography, and proposed commercial Page 17 of 39 development. The revised approach directs users to the planned shared-use path network along Lakeway Drive and Savannah Oaks Boulevard, maintaining equivalent connectivity while avoiding construction impacts within environmentally constrained areas and reducing potential confiicts associated with routing a shared-use path through commercial development. The roadway modiflcations similarly reduce environmental impacts by utilizing existing utility and infrastructure corridors where feasible and by responding to the site's natural topography. The proposed roadway network promotes efficient land use patterns and maximizes double-loaded street segments, reducing the need for additional roadway infrastructure, clearing, grading, and associated utility extensions. No signiflcant impacts to planned water, wastewater, or drainage infrastructure are anticipated. The proposed roadway and shared-use path modiflcations remain consistent with the overall utility and drainage framework previously contemplated for the development. Overall, the amendment better balances transportation objectives, environmental stewardship, and efficient infrastructure planning while preserving the functionality of the City's planned transportation network. Infrastructure Impact No signiflcant impacts to water, wastewater, or drainage infrastructure are anticipated as a result of the proposed changes. The revised alignments remain consistent with the planned utility framework and do not materially increase overall utility demand or alter the established drainage strategy for the site. Goals and Objectives The proposed amendment remains consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's goals related to transportation, connectivity, environmental stewardship, and coordinated infrastructure planning. The proposed shared-use path modiflcations continue to provide connectivity between residential areas, parks, open spaces, commercial destinations, and the broader shared-use path network. While portions of the alignment are relocated from a greenway setting to the Savannah Oaks Boulevard corridor, the revised alignment maintains the intended network connections and continues to support pedestrian and bicycle mobility throughout the development and to adjacent destinations, including Lick Creek Park. The amendment also advances Comprehensive Plan objectives related to efficient infrastructure placement and responsible environmental management. The revised alignment avoids areas with signiflcant topographic constraints, mature vegetation, and other natural features that would require substantial disturbance to accommodate construction. By locating portions of the shared- use path within planned transportation corridors, the amendment reduces environmental impacts, minimizes grading requirements, and improves long-term maintainability of public infrastructure. Page 18 of 39 The roadway modiflcations further support Comprehensive Plan policies encouraging coordinated transportation planning and efficient use of infrastructure corridors. Several roadway alignments have been reflned to better respond to existing utility easements, pipeline corridors, adjacent development patterns, and projected traffic demands identifled in the Traffic Impact Analysis. In particular, the proposed roadway classiflcation adjustments refiect current traffic projections while recognizing physical constraints associated with existing utility infrastructure. The amendment preserves the overall connectivity and function of the transportation network while allowing infrastructure to be located in a manner that is more compatible with existing site conditions and future development patterns. Collectively, the proposed changes support the Comprehensive Plan's broader objectives of orderly growth, efficient infrastructure investment, environmental preservation, and development of a connected transportation system. Page 19 of 39 JOB NO. DATE DESIGNER CHECKED SHEET DRAWN THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN PRODUCED FROM MATERIAL THAT WAS STORED AND/OR TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY AND MAY HAVE BEEN INADVERTENTLY ALTERED. RELY ONLY ON FINAL HARDCOPY MATERIALS BEARING THE CONSULTANT'S ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL.AERIAL IMAGERY PROVIDED BY GOOGLE © UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. Imagery ©2026, CAPCOG,Digital Globe,Texas Orthoimagery Program, USDA Farm Service Agency.Date: Jun 16, 2026 10:53 AM User: acoleFile: O:\Users\ACole\Exhibits\CTran\260311_SavannahOaks_Zoning\SavannahOaks.aprx Layout: SavannahOaks_ExistingRoadways_11x17L Map: CStat_ExistingRoadways1672 INDEPENDENCE DR, STE 102 I NEW BRAUNFELS, TX 78132 I 830.632.5633TEXAS ENGINEERING FIRM #470 | TEXAS SURVEYING FIRM #10028800F RO N T A G E 6 R D FR ONTAGE6RD H A R P ERSFERRYRD P EB B L E C R E EK P KW Y MATHER PKWYSTANDREWSDRROY A L A D ELADE D R Q U A LIT Y CIR Q U A R R Y O A K S D R L A KE W AY D RPATRI O T D RNANTUCKETDR DARLI N GT O N A V E W A Y F A R E R L N PRESTW ICKCTMARINERSCVVER ON AD RWINDJAMMER CT ROYA L A DELADELOO P BIRKDALEDRCA S C ADESD R C ONGR ESSIONALDRDA Y TO N A D RSYCAMOR E HIL L S DR GA TE W A Y B L V D R OCK F ORD DRTUC K E R N U C K RI VI ERACTPLUMHOLLOW DR SOUTHERNPO IN TE P K W Y OAKS DR P IN E VALLEY D RSCRIMSHAW LN B A L L C IRE LDO R A D R MISTY L N P A T R I O T D RFARAWAYISLANDDR SPART A N D R PI P E L I N E RD S TA T E H I G HW A Y 6 S T A T E H I G H W A Y 6 South Hampton Cove of Nantucket Southern Pointe Pebble Creek Legend Proposed Site College Station Existing Thoroughfare Plan Minor Collector Major Collector Minor Arterial Freeway/Expressway Grade Seperation College Station Bike Plan Bike Facility Proposed Bike Lane Existing Bike Route Proposed Grade Separation Proposed Shared Use Path Existing Shared Use Path Proposed 1.0 CT AC HF Jun 2026 30099-00 COLLEGE STATION, TEXASEXISTING ROADWAYS EXHIBITSAVANNAH OAKS³ 0 1,000 Feet Page 20 of 39 JOB NO. DATE DESIGNER CHECKED SHEET DRAWN THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN PRODUCED FROM MATERIAL THAT WAS STORED AND/OR TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY AND MAY HAVE BEEN INADVERTENTLY ALTERED. RELY ONLY ON FINAL HARDCOPY MATERIALS BEARING THE CONSULTANT'S ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL.AERIAL IMAGERY PROVIDED BY GOOGLE © UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. Imagery ©2026, CAPCOG,Digital Globe,Texas Orthoimagery Program, USDA Farm Service Agency.Date: Jun 25, 2026 11:25 AM User: acoleFile: O:\Users\ACole\Exhibits\CTran\260311_SavannahOaks_Zoning\SavannahOaks.aprx Layout: SavannahOaks_ProposedRoadways_11x17L Map: CStat_ProposedRoadways1672 INDEPENDENCE DR, STE 102 I NEW BRAUNFELS, TX 78132 I 830.632.5633TEXAS ENGINEERING FIRM #470 | TEXAS SURVEYING FIRM #10028800F RO N T A G E 6 R D FR ONTAGE6RD H A R P ERSFERRYRD P EB B L E C R E EK P KW Y MATHER PKWYSTANDREWSDRRO Y A L A D ELADE DR Q U A LIT Y CIR Q U A R R Y O A K S D R L A KE W AY D RPATRI O T D RNANTUCKETDR DARLI N GT O N A V E W A Y F A R E R L N PRESTW ICKCTMARINERSCVVER ON AD RWINDJAMMER CT ROYA L A DELADELOO P BIRKDALEDRCA S C ADESD R C ONGR ESSIONALDRDA Y TO N A D RSYCAMOR E HIL L S DR GA TE W A Y B L V D R OCK F ORD DRTUC K E R N U C K RI VI ERACTPLUMHOLLOW DR SOUTHERNPO IN TE P K W Y OAKS DR P IN E VALLEY D RSCRIMSHAW LN B A L L C IRE LDO R A D R MISTY L N P A T R I O T D RFARAWAYISLANDDR SPART A N D R PI P E L I N E RD S TA T E H I G HW A Y 6 S T A T E H I G H W A Y 6 South Hampton Cove of Nantucket Southern Pointe Pebble Creek 1 2 35 45 6 Legend Proposed Site Proposed Thoroughfare Minor Collector Major Collector Minor Arterial Freeway/Expressway Grade Separation Proposed Trails Bike Facility Proposed Bike Lane Existing Bike Route Proposed Shared Use Path Existing Shared Use Path Proposed 1.0 CT AC HF Jun 2026 30099-00 COLLEGE STATION, TEXASPROPOSED ROADWAYS EXHIBITSAVANNAH OAKS³ 0 1,000 Feet Connection to be made by Savannah Oaks developer Page 21 of 39 August 17, 2026 Item No. 3.3. Walk and Bike Audit Program Sponsor: Carl Ahrens, Staff Planner Reviewed By CBC: Bicycle, Pedestrian, & Greenways Advisory Board Agenda Caption: Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the implementation of a walk and bike audit program. Relationship to Strategic Goals: Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of creating the audit program. Summary: Aligning with Active Transportation Master Plan Implementation Task 5.23, a walk and bike audit program is being initiated for staff and residents to identify the status of and potential concerns for the active transportation network and help provide input for future project and planning considerations. Staff have developed separate walk and bike audit forms to utilize for this program that were adapted using forms from AARP and the U.S. Department of Transportation. The audit forms will be available on the City's website and can be submitted at any time by individuals, neighborhoods, classes, or other groups. The audit forms that are submitted will be reviewed, filed internally and utilized for future project considerations. Items of immediate maintenance concern, however, should be submitted and reported through the City's See-Click-Fix application. Staff-led audits are planned to occur twice a year and be performed as part of the City's long-range planning efforts, such as small area plans or district plans, applicable design projects, and feasibility studies. The walk audit and bike audit forms are attached in their final draft stage for any final revisions recommended by the Board. Staff will forward them to the Public Communications department to complete as fillable forms and upload them to the City's website. The forms can be completed digitally or printed out and completed by hand. This program will play a valuable role in gathering initial feedback for concerns regarding the active transportation network. Budget & Financial Summary: Attachments: 1. Walk Audit Form 2. Bike Audit Form Page 22 of 39 Walk Audit Sidewalks, Streets, and Crossings Location/Street Name(s): Audit Date: Start time: AM|PM End time: AM|PM If more than one lane: Does the roadway have ☐ a median and/or ☐ pedestrian island? The street has: ☐ No sidewalk ☐ No sidewalk but needs one ☐ No sidewalk but needs two ☐ Partial sidewalks ☐ A sidewalk on one side of the street ☐ Sidewalks on both sides of the street YES|NO|OTHER Skip any statements that don’t apply THE SIDEWALK: ☐ ☐ ☐ 1. Is in good condition, without cracks, gaps, breaks, or raised/uneven sections ☐ ☐ ☐ 2. Is free of obstacles (hydrants, utility poles, low hanging trees, trash receptacles, benches) ☐ ☐ ☐ 3. Has few driveway conflicts ☐ ☐ ☐ 4. Is separated from the street by a barrier or buffer (a curb, grass, landscaping) ☐ ☐ ☐ 5. Is continuous (no missing segments) and complete (does not abruptly end) ☐ ☐ ☐ 6. Is wide enough (at least 5 feet) for two people to walk side by side or pass one another ☐ ☐ ☐ 7. Has an ADA ramp wherever the sidewalk is interrupted by a street THE STREET: ☐ ☐ ☐ 1. Has traffic signals and/or stop signs at intersections ☐ ☐ ☐ 2. The traffic signals and/or stop signs are clearly visible to drivers and pedestrians ☐ ☐ ☐ 3. Has crosswalks ☐ ☐ ☐ 4. The crosswalks are well marked and clearly visible to drivers and pedestrians ☐ ☐ ☐ 5. Has signage alerting drivers to the presence of pedestrians ☐ ☐ ☐ 6. Has designated bicycle lanes ☐ ☐ ☐ 7. Has a pedestrian crossing signal or push button (If yes, complete next section) THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGNAL OR PUSH BUTTON: ☐ ☐ ☐ 1. Are working ☐ ☐ ☐ 2. Have a push-to-walk functionality, meaning pedestrians have to push to activate ☐ ☐ ☐ 3. Have audible prompts (calling out street name that can be crossed) for people with vision impairment ☐ ☐ ☐ 4. Are placed in appropriate locations ☐ ☐ ☐ 5. Provide enough time to cross (amount of time provided:___minutes ___seconds) ☐ ☐ ☐ 6. Provide suitable opportunities to cross (indicate amount of time pedestrians must wait for a traffic light change in order to cross:___minutes ___seconds) NOTES OR OTHER OBSERVATIONS: Text box to be placed here I would describe walking this area as: ☐ Comfortable for all ages and abilities ☐ Comfortable but not for young children and seniors ☐ Comfortable for adults ☐ Not comfortable for anyone Page 23 of 39 Walk Audit Street Safety and Appeal Location/Street Name(s): Audit Date: Start time: AM|PM End time: AM|PM YES|NO|OTHER Skip any statements that don’t apply THE LOCATION HAS: ☐ ☐ ☐ 1. Places to sit ☐ ☐ ☐ 2. Shade trees ☐ ☐ ☐ 3. Grass, flowers, and landscaping ☐ ☐ ☐ 4. Awnings, outdoor umbrellas or other shelter from rain and other weather conditions ☐ ☐ ☐ 5. Drinking fountains (if yes, are they working and clean?__) ☐ ☐ ☐ 6. Public restrooms ☐ ☐ ☐ 7. A transit or bus shelter ☐ ☐ ☐ 8. Trash receptacles ☐ ☐ ☐ 9. Informative signage ☐ ☐ ☐ 10. Well-placed signage ☐ ☐ ☐ 11. Streetscape features (art, signage, etc.) ☐ ☐ ☐ 12. Pedestrian-scaled lighting ☐ ☐ ☐ 13. A posted speed limit that seems suitable IMPRESSIONS: ☐ ☐ ☐ 1. The location/street is a safe and appealing destination ☐ ☐ ☐ 2. The location/street is a safe and appealing travel route ☐ ☐ ☐ 3. The location/street appears to be safe for users of all ages and abilities ☐ ☐ ☐ 4. The location/street appears to be safe for pedestrians during both the day and night ☐ ☐ ☐ 5. Pedestrians appear to be safe from moving vehicles For “No” or “Other” answers, use the space below or on the back of this worksheet to briefly explain the response NOTES OR OTHER OBSERVATIONS: Text box to be placed here I would describe walking this area as: ☐ Comfortable for all ages and abilities ☐ Comfortable but not for young children and seniors ☐ Comfortable for adults ☐ Not comfortable for anyone Page 24 of 39 Bike Audit Streets and Crossings Location/Street Name(s): Audit Date: Start time: AM|PM End time: AM|PM Starting Location: Ending Location: Posted speed limit(s): Do the motorists appear to be obeying the speed limit(s)? Yes ☐ No ☐ Number of vehicle lanes: The street is: one-way ☐|two-way ☐ If more than one lane: the roadway has a median ☐| a pedestrian island ☐ Does the street have a sidewalk? No ☐| Yes, on one side of the street ☐| Yes, on both sides of the street ☐ Is a sidewalk needed? No ☐| Yes, on one side of the street ☐| Yes, on both sides of the street ☐ Does the street have a bike lane? No ☐| Yes, on one side of the street ☐| Yes, on both sides of the street ☐ Is a bike lane needed? No ☐| Yes, on one side of the street ☐| Yes, on both sides of the street ☐ YES|NO|OTHER Skip any statements that don’t apply THE STREET: ☐ ☐ ☐ 1. Has traffic lights and/or stop sign at intersectfons and crossings ☐ ☐ ☐ 2. Has traffic lights and/or stop signs that are clearly visible to drivers and other roadway users ☐ ☐ ☐ 3. Allows motorists to make a right turn on red ☐ ☐ ☐ 4. Has dedicated traffic lights for bicyclists ☐ ☐ ☐ 5. Has crosswalks ☐ ☐ ☐ 6. The crosswalks are well marked and clearly visible to drivers and pedestrians ☐ ☐ ☐ 7. Has signage alertfng drivers to the presence of bicyclists ☐ ☐ ☐ 8. Has signage and road markings that help users navigate ☐ ☐ ☐ 9. Has a pedestrian crossing signal or push button (If yes, complete next sectfon) THE CROSSING SIGNALS: ☐ ☐ ☐ 1. Are working ☐ ☐ ☐ 2. Have a push-to-walk/bike functfonality, meaning cyclists have to push to actfvate ☐ ☐ ☐ 3. Are placed in appropriate locatfons ☐ ☐ ☐ 4. Provide audible as well as visual prompts ☐ ☐ ☐ 5. Provide enough tfme to walk or ride a bicycle from one side of the street to the other (indicate the amount of tfme: minutes seconds) ☐ ☐ ☐ 6. Provide suitable opportunitfes to cross (indicate the amount of tfme pedestrians/cyclists must wait for a traffic light to change in order to cross: minutes seconds) THE RIDING SURFACE: ☐ ☐ ☐ 1. Is good or adequate ☐ ☐ ☐ 2. The surface is concrete ☐ ☐ ☐ 3. Has potholes, cracks, gaps or uneven spots ☐ ☐ ☐ 4. Has debris (trash, broken glass, etc.) ☐ ☐ ☐ 5. Has dangerous obstructfons (drain gates, utflity covers, metal plates, rumble strips, etc.) ☐ ☐ ☐ 6. Is very slippery when wet NOTES OR OTHER OBSERVATIONS: Text box to be placed here I would describe walking this area as: ☐ Comfortable for all ages and abilitfes ☐ Comfortable but not for young children and seniors ☐ Comfortable for adults ☐ Not comfortable for anyone Page 25 of 39 Bike Audit Street, Path, or Trail Safety and Appeal Location/Street Name(s): Audit Date: Start time: AM|PM End time: AM|PM YES|NO|OTHER Skip any statements that don’t apply THE LOCATION HAS: ☐ ☐ ☐ 1. Places to sit ☐ ☐ ☐ 2. Shade trees ☐ ☐ ☐ 3. Awnings, outdoor umbrellas or similar shelter from rain, the sun, or other weather ☐ ☐ ☐ 4. Grass and landscaping ☐ ☐ ☐ 5. Drinking fountains ☐ ☐ ☐ 6. Public restrooms ☐ ☐ ☐ 7. Trash receptacles ☐ ☐ ☐ 8. Informatfve signage ☐ ☐ ☐ 9. Well-placed signage ☐ ☐ ☐ 10. A bike “fix-it” statfon ☐ ☐ ☐ 11. Secure parking for bikes ☐ ☐ ☐ 12. Streetscape features (art, signage, etc.) ☐ ☐ ☐ 13. Pedestrian scaled lightfng ☐ ☐ ☐ 14. A sensible speed limit ☐ ☐ ☐ 15. Emergency call buttons or kiosks PERSONAL IMPRESSIONS ☐ ☐ ☐ 1. The locatfon/street is safe and appealing ☐ ☐ ☐ 2. The locatfon/street if a safe and appealing travel route ☐ ☐ ☐ 3. The locatfon/street appears to be safe for users of all ages, abilitfes, demographics, etc. ☐ ☐ ☐ 4. The locatfon appears to be safe for cyclists during the day ☐ ☐ ☐ 5. The locatfon appears to be safe for cyclists after dark ☐ ☐ ☐ 6. Pedestrians and cyclists appear to be safe from moving vehicles ☐ ☐ ☐ 7. Drivers appear to be following the traffic rules and are respectiul of cyclist safety NOTES OR OTHER OBSERVATIONS: Text box to be placed here I would describe walking this area as: ☐ Comfortable for all ages and abilitfes ☐ Comfortable but not for young children and seniors ☐ Comfortable for adults ☐ Not comfortable for anyone Page 26 of 39 August 17, 2026 Item No. 3.4. Fall Community Bike Ride Sponsor: Carl Ahrens, Staff Planner Reviewed By CBC: Bicycle, Pedestrian, & Greenways Advisory Board Agenda Caption: Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the development of a fall community bike ride. Relationship to Strategic Goals: Recommendation(s): Staff requests the Board provide input regarding the proposed event. Summary: The cities of College Station and Bryan have been coordinating with Bryan-College Station Sister Cities on securing grant funding through the Sister Cities organization to host a "Biketober" themed ride and event that would promote German and cycling culture in creative ways while also putting a focus on cycling safety. The event date is Saturday, October 10, 2026 which is a weekend without a home Texas A&M football game. Bryan-College Station Sister Cities has indicated that they are being awarded the grant funding and partnering agencies have been moving forward with the planning of the event. We are the only area in Texas to receive this type of funding, and one of only two in the United States. The proposed bike route is anticipated to start at College Station City Hall and travel to Bryan's Midtown Park and farmer's market before looping back and ending back at City Hall with cultural activities available at each location. In late August, City representatives from College Station and Bryan will meet with Ambassador Christina Beinhoff, Head of the Directorate-General for Culture and Communication of the German Federal Foreign Office, which represents Germany’s interests to the world to discuss having exchange relationships with German society to enrich our community's involvement in international cross-cultural learning programs, educational networks, and communications to advance citizen diplomacy. This will also serve as the opportunity to provide a grant award announcement that will help launch the campaign for the Biketober event. Staff will provide more details as they are developed and become available. Budget & Financial Summary: Attachments: None Page 27 of 39 August 17, 2026 Item No. 3.5. Project Prioritization Update Sponsor: Jesse DiMeolo Reviewed By CBC: Bicycle, Pedestrian, & Greenways Advisory Board Agenda Caption: Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an update to the status of unfunded standalone sidewalk, shared use path, and bike lane projects. Relationship to Strategic Goals: Recommendation(s): Summary: This item provides an update on the Board's previously adopted prioritization of unfunded, standalone sidewalk, shared use path, and bike lane projects. Beginning in October 2023, the Board worked with City staff to develop and refine a project prioritization methodology, culminating in the adoption of final project rankings in Spring 2024. The final rankings were established using Board member priority votes to order projects within the high, medium, and low priority categories. Since that time, several projects have advanced through design, secured funding, been completed, or otherwise changed status. This update summarizes those changes and provides the Board with the current status of the prioritized project lists for sidewalks, shared use paths, and bike lanes for informational purposes. Budget & Financial Summary: Attachments: 1. Sidewalks Priorities List 2. Shared Use Paths - Along Street Priorities List 3. Shared Use Paths - Off-Street Priorities List 4. Bike Lanes-Bike Facility Priorities List Page 28 of 39 Sidewalks Priorities List 2024 BPG Board Rank Street Name From To Miles Cost Estimate Status Notes 1 HOLLEMAN DRIVE 5 430FT N OF VILLAGE DR ANDERSON ST 0.16 190,000$ Funded for Construction Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) project under design - TxDOT letting Feb 2027 2 PARK PLACE 1 ANDERSON ST BACK OF HEB 0.34 405,000$ Preliminary Design Feasibility study completed in 2025 3 GEORGE BUSH DR E 1 DOMINIK DR UNIVERSITY OAKS BL 0.12 180,000$ Funded for Construction Under design - 2028 completion 4 ANDERSON STREET VILLAGE DR.HOLLEMAN DR.0.11 129,000$ Funded for Construction HSIP project under design - TxDOT letting Feb 2027 5 TIMBER STREET 630 FT SE OF GEORGE BUSH DR PARK PLACE 0.20 271,000$ Funded for Construction Under design - 2028 completion 6 DEXTER DRIVE SOUTH 1 WINDING RD HAINES DR 0.25 190,000$ Funded for Construction Under design - 2028 completion 7 ASH STREET 2 EISENHOWER ST NIMITZ ST 0.06 130,000$ Funded for Construction Under design - 2028 completion 8 UNIVERSITY OAKS BLVD 445 FT NE of GEORGE BUSH DR E GEORGE BUSH DR E 0.08 100,000$ Preliminary Design Harvey District Plan Corridor Feasibility 9 UNIVERSITY OAKS BLVD 3 OLYMPIA WY STALLINGS DR 0.14 165,000$ Preliminary Design Harvey District Plan Corridor Feasibility 10 FAIRVIEW AVENUE GEORGE BUSH DR LUTHER ST 0.39 473,000$ Preliminary Design Feasibility study completed in 2025 11 FOSTER AVENUE LINCOLN AVE WALTON DR 0.10 155,000$ Funded for Construction Under design - 2028 completion 12 NUECES DRIVE GUADALUPE DR HARVEY MITCHELL PW S 0.07 150,000$ Funded for Construction Under design - 2028 completion 13 LIVE OAK ST 1 EISENHOWER ST TURNER ST 0.13 161,000$ 14 WALTON DRIVE FOSTER AV PURYEAR DR 0.22 175,000$ Funded for Construction Under design - 2028 completion 15 WALTON DRIVE 1 NUNN ST FRANCIS DR 0.26 200,000$ Funded for Construction Under design - 2028 completion 16 GROVE ST WELLBORN RD 135 FT NE OF WELLBORN RD 0.03 32,000$ 17 HARVEST DRIVE SPRINGFIELD DR WESTFIELD DR 0.03 36,000$ 18 FLOWER MOUND DRIVE WESTFIELD DR SPRINGFIELD DR 0.03 37,000$ 19 HOLLEMAN DRIVE 2 ANDERSON ST WELSH AVE 0.68 815,000$ Partially Removed Portion from Glade to Welsh was removed with the Active Transportation Master Plan 20 POPLAR ST 2 EISENHOWER ST 445 FT SW OF EISENHOWER ST 0.08 102,000$ HIGH PRIORITY 1 Page 29 of 39 Sidewalks Priorities List 2024 BPG Board Rank Street Name From To Miles Cost Estimate Status Notes 21 TURNER ST POPLAR ST 145 FT SE OF ASH ST 0.13 161,000$ 22 NAGLE STREET INLOW BL CROSS ST 0.13 151,000$ 23 EISENHOWER ST 1 UNIVERSITY DR E ASH ST 0.18 220,000$ 24 HOLLEMAN DRIVE 1 FAIRVEW AVE GEORGIA ST 0.03 37,000$ 25 HOLLEMAN DRIVE 3 375 FT NE OF ELEANOR ST ELEANOR ST 0.07 85,000$ 26 SCARLETT OHARA DRIVE UNIVERSITY OAKS BL HARVEY RD 0.15 179,000$ 27 UNIVERSITY OAKS BLVD 2 TARA CT RHETT BUTLER DR 0.42 499,000$ Preliminary Design Harvey District Plan Corridor Feasibility 28 ANDERSON STREET 1 SOUTHWEST PKWY ENTRANCE OF COLLEGE STATION CITY CEMETARY 0.17 204,000$ Preliminary Design Feasibility study completed in 2025 29 ELEANOR STREET MONTCLAIR AVE THOMPSON ST.0.06 71,000$ Preliminary Design Feasibility study completed in 2025 30 KYLE AVENUE PURYEAR DR 130 FT SW OF PURYEAR DR 0.04 42,000$ 31 JAMES PARKWAY NORTHSIDE FRANCIS DR SOUTHSIDE FRANCIS DR 0.03 36,000$ 32 PHOENIX STREET HOLLEMAN DR 445 FT SE OF HOLLEMAN DR 0.08 101,000$ 33 FIDELITY ST WELLBORN RD MONTCLAIR AV 0.21 253,000$ 34 WELSH AVENUE 1 NEVADA ST SOUTHWEST PW 0.19 234,000$ Funded for Construction Under design - start construction beginning of 2027 35 WELSH AVENUE 2 SOUTHWEST PW HARVEY MITCHELL PW S 0.46 547,000$ Funded for Construction Under construction 36 NEVADA STREET WELSH AV PHOENIX ST 0.19 229,000$ 37 HONDO DRIVE SOUTHWEST PW NUECES DR 0.21 251,000$ 38 HOLLEMAN DRIVE WEST 1 MARION PUGH DR CORREGIDOR DR 0.43 521,000$ Partially Constructed Private development constructed from Marion Pugh to Jones Butler MEDIUM PRIORITY 2 Page 30 of 39 Sidewalks Priorities List 2024 BPG Board Rank Street Name From To Miles Cost Estimate Status Notes 39 TARROW STREET E 29TH ST PEYTON ST 0.50 603,000$ Preliminary Design Feasibility study completed in 2025 40 TODD TRAIL SOUTHWOOD DR RIO GRANDE BL 0.36 438,000$ 41 HARVEY ROAD EARL RUDDER FW S FRONTAGE RD W 740FT NE OF RHETT BUTLER DR 0.32 378,000$ 42 MOSS ST TEXAS AV FOSTER AV 0.09 106,000$ 43 POPLAR ST 4 EISENHOWER ST TURNER ST 0.14 162,000$ 44 CAUDILL STREET HOLLEMAN DR GUNSMITH ST 0.37 449,000$ 45 GUNSMITH STREET TRIGGER ST CAUDILL ST 0.09 111,000$ 46 TRIGGER STREET GUNSMITH ST DEXTER DR S 0.12 142,000$ 47 BRENTWOOD DRIVE EAST BRENTWOOD DR E BRENTWOOD DR (ACROSS TEXAS AVE S) 0.05 57,000$ 48 HAINES DRIVE TAURUS AV LANGFORD ST 0.27 323,000$ 49 WELLESLEY COURT UNIVERSITY TOWN CENTER CONNECTOR TARROW ST 0.15 175,000$ 50 HOLLEMAN DRIVE 4 ARIZONA ST WELLBORN RD 0.18 218,000$ 51 WELSH AVENUE HOLLEMAN DR SWISS CT 0.15 185,000$ 52 MERRY OAKS DRIVE DOMINIK DR MAGNOLIA DR 0.05 59,000$ 53 DEXTER DRIVE SOUTH LLANO PL CONCHO PL 0.11 132,000$ 54 GILCHRIST AVE EAST FOSTER AV PURYEAR DR 0.16 188,000$ Funded for Construction Part of the Thomas Park improvements 55 PURYEAR DRIVE KYLE AV DOMINIK DR 0.03 38,000$ 56 PEDERNALES DRIVE SAN BENITO DR VAL VERDE DR 0.05 58,000$ 57 SOUTHLAND STREET ONEY HERVEY DR WELLBORN RD 0.20 239,000$ 58 GEORGIA STREET HOLLEMAN DR NEVADA ST 0.25 294,000$ 59 VALLEY VIEW DRIVE LONGMIRE DR SOUTHWOOD DR 0.28 330,000$ 60 PHOENIX STREET 1 680 FT NW OF NEVADA ST NEVADA ST 0.13 151,000$ 3 Page 31 of 39 Sidewalks Priorities List 2024 BPG Board Rank Street Name From To Miles Cost Estimate Status Notes 61 VAL VERDE DRIVE RIO GRANDE BL PEDERNALES DR 0.20 234,000$ 62 COMAL TO ARBOLES CONNECTION COMAL CIRCLE ARBOLES CIRCLE 0.07 81,000$ 63 MANUEL DRIVE CREST ST CORNELL DR 0.26 310,000$ 64 TODD TRAIL 1 LONGMIRE DR BROTHERS BL 0.27 329,000$ 65 WALTON DR 2 TEXAS AVE S WALTON DR 0.10 119,000$ 66 EISENHOWER ST 3 180 FT SE OF COONER ST COONER ST 0.03 41,000$ 67 HOLLEMAN DRIVE WEST WOODWAY DR LEGACY LN 0.27 320,000$ Preliminary Design HSIP project under design - TxDOT letting Feb 2029 - sidewalks on east side 68 NIMITZ ST 415 FT SE OF COONER ST COONER ST 0.08 95,000$ 69 NAVARRO DRIVE WELSH AV PINTAIL LN 0.09 103,000$ 70 HEARTHSTONE CIRCLE CHIMNEY HILL CR TARROW ST 0.04 46,000$ 71 AUTUMN CIRCLE TARROW ST 130 FT E OF TARROW ST 0.02 27,000$ Preliminary Design Feasibility study completed in 2025 72 NORMAND DRIVE DEACON DR PONDEROSA DR 0.47 560,000$ 73 PONDEROSA DRIVE SH 6 S FRONTAGE RD W LONGMIRE DR 0.03 35,000$ 74 FOXFIRE DRIVE SEBESTA RD.CONCORD CR.0.46 549,000$ 75 RAINTREE DRIVE WILDERNESS DR N FOREST OAKS DR 0.19 230,000$ 76 WOODCREEK CONNECTOR BROOKWATER CR.SHADOWCREST DR 0.06 73,000$ 77 SANDSTONE DRIVE EMERALD PW SEBESTA RD 0.12 149,000$ 78 SHADOWCREST DRIVE TIMBER KNOLL DR WOODCREEK DR 0.24 286,000$ 79 DECATUR DRIVE FRONT ROYAL DR.PUBLIC ALLEY 0.17 202,000$ 80 TARROW STREET EAST TARROW ST UNIVERSITY DR E 0.20 238,000$ Preliminary Design Changed to SUP with Active Transportation Master Plan 81 DEACON DRIVE DURANGO CT FRATERNITY ROW 0.06 72,000$ LOW PRIORITY 4 Page 32 of 39 Sidewalks Priorities List 2024 BPG Board Rank Street Name From To Miles Cost Estimate Status Notes 82 RHETT BUTLER DRIVE BAYOU WOODS DR HARDWOOD LN 0.06 73,000$ 83 FM 2818 SERVICE ROAD 1 LONGMIRE DR 250 FT SW FROM LONGMIRE DR 0.05 59,000$ Removed Parallel SUP built along FM 2818 84 FM 2818 SERVICE ROAD HILLTOP DR.500FT SW OF LONGMIRE DR.0.09 110,000$ Removed Parallel SUP built along FM 2818 85 MACARTHUR ST 1 UNIVERSITY DR E COONER ST 0.13 161,000$ 86 COONER STREET 2 260 FT NE OF MACARTHUR ST END OF COONER ST 0.05 56,000$ 87 UNIVERSITY OAKS BLVD 1 TARA CT MERRY OAKS DR 0.04 47,000$ Preliminary Design Harvey District Plan Corridor Feasibility 88 ARGUELLO DRIVE CHIMNEY HILL DR TARROW ST 0.11 137,000$ 89 AIRLINE DRIVE SOUTHWOOD DR SHENANDOAH DR 0.20 242,000$ 90 BAYOU WOODS DRIVE RHETT BUTLER DR.HARDWOOD LN.0.17 203,000$ 91 WOODWAY DRIVE WOODSMAN DR HOLLEMAN DR W 0.03 38,000$ 92 FRATERNITY ROW 1 FM 2154 FRATERNITY ROW PARKING LOT ENTRANCE 0.02 24,000$ 93 SHADY DRIVE FOREST DR FRANCIS DR 0.15 184,000$ Removed Removed with Active Transportation Master Plan 94 GATEWAY BLVD LAKEWAY DR SH 6 0.20 236,000$ Completed Constructed by private development 95 SOUTHERN PLANTATION DRIVE SH 6 S STONY CREEK LN 0.46 558,000$ 96 JANE ST 1 135 FT SE OF COONER ST COONER ST 0.03 31,000$ 97 FRATERNITY ROW DEACON DR FRATERNITY ROW CORNER 0.11 129,000$ 98 WILDERNESS DRIVE NORTH BUTLER RIDGE DR RAINTREE DR 0.08 92,000$ 99 GREAT OAKS DRIVE ARBOLEDA DR ROCK PRAIRIE RD W 0.76 912,000$ 100 ARBOLEDA DRIVE QUAIL RUN GREAT OAKS DR 0.33 400,000$ 5 Page 33 of 39 Shared Use Paths along Streets 2024 BPG Board Rank Street Name From To Miles Cost Estimate Status Notes 1 WILLIAM D. FITCH PARKWAY 1 BARRON RD GRAHAM RD 0.82 $1,648,000.00 Preliminary design and Partially completed Portion between Barron Road and Hofburg Dr constructed by private development, remainder part of corridor feasbility study 2 WILLIAM D. FITCH PARKWAY 1A SH 6 BARRON RD 2.17 $4,336,000.00 Preliminary Design Partially studied w/ corridor feasibility study 3 HARVEY ROAD WEST 1 TEXAS AVE DARTMOUTH ST 0.67 $1,348,000.00 Preliminary Design Design by City, construction as MPO/TxDOT project 4 WELLBORN ROAD 1 PARK PLACE LUTHER ST 0.06 250,000$ 5 TEXAS AVENUE HARVEY MITCHELL DEACON DR 0.69 $1,383,000.00 6 HARVEY ROAD WEST 2 MUNSON AVE SH 6 0.57 $1,143,000.00 Preliminary Design Design by City, construction as MPO/TxDOT project 7 TEXAS AVE LINCOLN AVE UNIVERSITY DR E 0.32 642,000$ 8 UNIVERSITY DRIVE EAST TEXAS AVE LINCOLN AVE 1.13 2,261,000$ 9 RAYMOND STOTZER PARKWAY 2 WELLBORN RD HARVEY MITCHELL PKWY 1.06 2,123,000$ 10 ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD 2 BRIAN BACHMANN NORMAND DR 0.52 1,047,000$ 11 HARVEY ROAD EAST 1 SUMMIT CROSSING LANE SH 6 1.47 2,947,000$ Preliminary Design TxDOT/County project under design 12 SOUTHWEST PKWY SOUTHSIDE 2 SOUTHWEST PARK WELSH AVE 0.40 793,000$ 13 SOUTHWEST PKWY SOUTHSIDE 5 WELLBORN RD SOUTHWEST PARK 0.10 194,000$ 14 SOUTHWEST PKWY NORTHSIDE 3 WELLBORN RD WELSH AVE 0.54 1,075,000$ 15 ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD 3 WELLBORN RD BRIAN BACHMANN PARK CONNECTOR 2 0.80 1,595,000$ 16 TARROW STREET AUTUMN CIRCLE BRYAN CITY LIMIT 0.03 55,000$ Funded for Construction MPO Category 9 Funding 17 SOUTHWEST PKWY NORTHSIDE 1 WELSH AVE BEE CREEK TRAIL 0.83 1,662,000$ 18 SOUTHWEST PKWY SOUTHSIDE 3 WELSH AVE BEE CREEK TRAIL 0.84 1,677,000$ HIGH PRIORITY MEDIUM PRIORITY 1 Page 34 of 39 2024 BPG Board Rank Street Name From To Miles Cost Estimate Status Notes 19 ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD 1 NORMAND DR LONGMIRE DR 0.32 644,000$ 20 GEORGE BUSH DRIVE HARVEY MITCHELL PKWY WELLBORN RD 1.25 2,494,000$ 21 HARVEY ROAD EAST 2 FM 158 ASCEND LANE 0.70 1,397,000$ Preliminary Design TxDOT/County project under design 22 F&B HARVEY MITCHELL PKWY TURKEY CREEK RD 0.52 1,044,000$ 23 SOUTHWEST PKWY NORTHSIDE 4 BEE CREEK TRAIL DARTMOUTH ST 0.82 1,641,000$ 24 SOUTHWEST PKWY SOUTHSIDE 4 DARTMOUTH ST SH 6 0.65 1,307,000$ 25 RAYMOND STOTZER PARKWAY 1 HARVEY MITCHELL PKWY TURKEY CREEK RD 0.36 723,000$ Partially completed Constructed by private development 26 WOODLAKE DR VICTORIA AVE GREENS PRARIE RD 0.52 1,033,000$ 27 VICTORIA AVE WELLBORN RD WOODLAKE DR 0.71 1,418,000$ Funded for Construction - Partial Under design for portion from Creek Meadows Blvd to Woodlake Dr for fall 2027 completion 28 MCCULLOUGH RD WELLBORN RD BREWSTER DR EXTENSION 0.48 963,000$ 29 SOUTHWEST PKWY NORTHSIDE 2 DARTMOUTH ST SH 6 0.66 1,319,000$ 30 WILLIAM D. FITCH PARKWAY 2 ROCK PRAIRIE RD CARTER'S CREEK 0.91 1,814,000$ 31 LONGMIRE DRIVE ROCK PRAIRIE RD GRAHAM RD 0.35 697,000$ Removed Removed with Active Transportation Master Plan 32 SPRING CREEK 3 SOCO APTS SPRING CREEK 2 0.08 161,000$ 33 ARNOLD ROAD BRIAN BACHMANN PARK CONNECTOR 1 ARNOLD RD TRAIL 0.12 243,000$ 34 PEBBLE CREEK PARKWAY LICK CREEK TRAIL ROYAL ADELADE DR 0.59 1,174,000$ 35 ALEXANDRIA AVENUE SOUTHERN PLANTATION DR SPRING CREEK 4 0.33 661,000$ 36 SOUTHWEST PKWY SOUTHSIDE 1 BEE CREEK TRAIL DARTMOUTH ST 0.82 1,631,000$ LOW PRIORITY 2 Page 35 of 39 2024 BPG Board Rank Project Name From To Miles Cost Estimate Status Notes 1 BEE CREEK 2 HARVEY MITCHELL PKWY BEE CREEK PARK 0.57 1,330,000$ Funded for Construction Under Design - 2028 completion date 2 GULF STATES UTILITY EASEMENT 1 BRYAN CITY LIMIT SOUTHERN POINT PKWY 8.18 $16,356,000 3 WOLF PEN CREEK GEORGE BUSH DR E TEXAS AVE 0.24 489,000$ 4 JOHN CROMPTON PARK CONNECTOR HOLLEMAN DR W JONES BUTLER RD 0.39 781,000$ Removed Removed with the Active Transportation Master Plan 5 BRIAN BACHMANN PARK CONNECTOR 2 ROCK PRAIRIE RD ARNOLD RD TRAIL 0.23 457,000$ 6 BEE CREEK TRIB B HOLLEMAN DR SOUTHLAND ST 0.26 700,000$ Funded for Construction Under Design - 2028 completion date 7 SPRING CREEK 4 BRIDGEWATER DR SOCO APTS 0.21 450,000$ Funded for Construction Under Design - 2028 completion date - Alexandria Ave not Bridgewater Drive 8 BRIAN BACHMANN PARK CONNECTOR 1 ROCK PRAIRIE RD ARNOLD RD 0.23 455,000$ Partially complete 9 LEMON TREE PARK CONNECTOR GLADE ST LEMON TREE PARK TRAIL 0.10 197,000$ 10 SPRING CREEK 1 SH 6 LICK CREEK TRAIL 1.29 2,578,000$ Preliminary Design Preliminary plan under review 11 SPRING CREEK 2 SH 6 S ARRINGTON RD 0.37 748,000$ 12 STEPHEN C. BEACHY CENTRAL PARK CONNECTOR SH 6 CENTRAL PARK 0.08 159,000$ 13 SPRING CREEK 7 REATTA MEADOWS PARK VICTORIA AVE 0.28 562,000$ Preliminary Design Preliminary plan under review for private development 14 SPRING CREEK 8 VICTORIA AVE SONOMA PARK 0.42 833,000$ 15 SWITCH STATION ROAD CONNECTOR APPOMATTOX DR GULF STATES TRAIL 0.21 430,000$ Removed Relocated to Brookway Drive 16 APPOMATTOX DRIVE CONNECTOR HORSE HAVEN LN APPOMATTOX DR 0.15 298,000$ Removed 17 BEE CREEK TRIB 3 DARTMOUTH ST CENTRAL PARK 0.23 463,000$ 18 BILLY MADELY PARK TRL 1 COONER ST BILLY MADELY PARK 0.10 198,000$ 19 SPRING CREEK WOODLAND HILLS CONNECTOR WOODLAND HILLS PARK SPRING CREEK CONNECTOR 0.09 174,000$ Preliminary Design Preliminary plan under review HIGH PRIORITY MEDIUM PRIORITY Off-Street Shared Use Paths 1 Page 36 of 39 2024 BPG Board Rank Project Name From To Miles Cost Estimate Status Notes 20 LICK CREEK 1 LONGMIRE DR HIBISCUS ST ROW TRAIL 0.84 1,672,000$ 21 UNIVERSITY DRIVE CONNECTOR UNIVERSITY DR E SHADY DR 0.17 333,000$ Removed 22 SPRING CREEK CONNECTOR SPRING MEADOWS SUBDIVISION SPRING CREEK TRAIL 1 0.18 351,000$ Preliminary Design Preliminary plan under review 23 SPRING CREEK 6 REATTA MEADOWS PARK BRIDGEWATER DR 0.29 580,000$ Preliminary Design Preliminary plan under review for private development 24 BEE CREEK 1 SH 6 GULF STATES TRAIL 0.79 1,583,000$ 25 WOLF PEN CREEK CONNECTOR POST OAK MALL WOLF PEN CREEK TRAIL 0.08 160,000$ 26 LICK CREEK 2 HUNTINGTON APTS LICK CREEK TRAIL 0.66 1,327,000$ Realigned Modified to go through Independence Park 27 SPRING CREEK 5 SOUTHERN OAKS PARK SPRING CREEK 6 0.24 478,000$ 28 SPRING CREEK TRIB 7 WILLIAM D FITCH PKWY SPRING CREEK 6 0.43 857,000$ Constructed Constructed by private development 29 LICK CREEK TRIB 10 MIDTOWN RESERVE SUBDIVISION LICK CREEK TRIB 11 1 0.31 627,000$ Constructed Constructed by private development 30 GULF STATES UTILITY EASEMENT CONNECTOR HORSE HAVEN SUBDIVSION GULF STATES TRAIL 0.09 187,000$ Removed Nearby projection from Halter Loop exists 31 ALUM CREEK TRIB 1 LAKEWAY DR ALUM CREEK TRAIL 0.99 1,972,000$ 32 ALUM CREEK SH 6 PEBBLE CREEK PKWY EXTENSION 1.16 2,312,000$ 33 ALUM CREEK TRIB 4 NANTUCKET DR EXTENSION ALUM CREEK TRAIL 0.37 731,000$ 34 ALUM CREEK TRIB 2 LICK CREEK PARK PEBBLE CREEK PKWY EXTENSION 1.07 2,145,000$ LOW PRIORITY 2 Page 37 of 39 2024 BPG Board Rank Street From To Miles Status Notes 1 TIMBER ST GEORGE BUSH DR PARK PL 0.33 Preliminary Design Feasibility study completed in 2025 2 HOLLEMAN DR WEST MARION PUGH DR HARVEY MITCHELL PKWY S 0.62 3 DOMINIK DR TEXAS AVE S MUNSON AVE 0.79 Preliminary Design Harvey District Plan Corridor Feasibility 4 GLADE ST 2 PARK PL HOLLEMAN DR 0.36 5 ANDERSON ST SOUTHWEST PKWY BEE CREEK 0.32 Preliminary Design Feasibility study completed in 2025 6 BRENTWOOD DRIVE DARTMOUTH ST ANDERSON ST 0.74 7 STALLINGS DR 1 DOMINIK DR UNIVERSITY OAKS BLVD 0.15 Removed Changed to future Bike Route with Active Transportation Master Plan 8 MUNSON AVE GILCHRIST AVE HARVEY RD 0.36 Preliminary Design Harvey District Plan Corridor Feasibility 9 SPRING LOOP TARROW ST UNIVERSITY DR E 0.60 10 UNIVERSITY OAKS BLVD GEORGE BUSH DR S SH 6 FRONTAGE RD W 1.19 Preliminary Design Harvey District Plan Corridor Feasibility 11 NAGLE ST INLOW BLVD CHURCH AVE 0.28 Completed 12 SCARLETT OHARA DR UNIVERSITY OAKS BLVD HARVEY RD 0.16 13 NEWPORT LN EAGLE AVE SOUTHERN PLANTATION DR 0.72 14 NAVARRO DR WELLBORN RD WELSH AVE 0.58 15 BROTHERS BLVD TEXAS AVE S LONGMIRE DR 0.25 16 DEACON DR 1 RIO GRANDE BLVD BROTHERS BLVD 0.30 17 GENERAL PARKWAY 2 140 FT NW OF CAPPS DR ROCK PRARIE RD W 0.26 18 GLENHAVEN DR UNIVERSITY DR E DOMINIK DR 0.57 19 RIO GRANDE BLVD 80 FT SE OF GAIL PL PONDEROSA DR 0.17 20 SCHAFFER ROAD 160 FT NW OF BOUGAINVILLEA ST GRAHAM RD 0.38 21 ALEXANDRIA AVE GRAHAM RD SOUTHERN PLANTATION DR 1.12 22 DECATUR DR BARRON RD 150 FT SE OF ALEXANDRIA AVE 0.65 23 SOUTHERN PLANTATION DR 2 SAN MAR DR SH 6 FRONTAGE RD W 0.96 24 CASTLE ROCK PW 1 630 FT W OF ROCKY CREEK TR 50 FT N OF WILLIAM D FITCH PKWY 0.41 Bike Lanes / Bike Facility HIGH PRIORITY MEDIUM PRIORITY Page 38 of 39 2024 BPG Board Rank Street From To Miles Status Notes 25 CASTLEGATE DR VICTORIA AVE GREENS PRARIE RD 0.86 26 SPEARMAN DR 2 150 FT N OF FORE CT ST ANDREWS DR 0.47 27 LAKEWAY DR 2 AGATE DR VENTURE DR 0.22 28 PARKVIEW DR LAKEWAY DR SPEARMAN DR 0.38 29 BIRMINGHAM RD NORMAND DR SH 6 FRONTAGE RD W 0.37 30 CORSAIR DR EMERALD PKWY PAVILION AVE 0.32 31 CREEK MEADOW BLVD 2 CREEK MEADOW BLVD N COTTONWOOD CREEK LN 0.32 32 APPOMATTOX DR 1 HARVEY RD SWITCH STATION RD 0.40 33 CREEK MEADOW BLVD 1 VICTORIA AVE CREEK MEADOW BLVD N 0.58 34 PAVILION AV 1 CORSAIR DR SEBESTA RD 0.12 35 EMERALD PKWY 290 FT E OF SH 6 ROSEWOOD DR 0.30 36 NORTH FOREST PKWY 1 SH 6 FRONTAGE RD E APPOMATTOX DR 0.50 37 APPOMATTOX DR 4 PALM CT NORTH FOREST PKWY 0.17 38 STONEBROOK DR CONCORD CIR ROCK PRARIE RD 0.57 39 WOODCREEK DR WHITNEY LN FONTAINE DR 0.05 40 APPOMATTOX DR 5 NORTH FOREST PKWY EMERALD PKWY 0.68 LOW PRIORITY Bike Lanes / Bike Facility Page 39 of 39