Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/24/2025 - Regular Minutes - City CouncilMINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING IN -PERSON WITH TELECONFERENCE PARTICIPATION CITY OF COLLEGE STATION NOVEMBER 24, 2025 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BRAZOS § Present: John Nichols, Mayor Council: Mark Smith, Mayor ProTem William Wright David White Melissa Mcllhaney Bob Yancy Scott Shafer City Staff: Bryan Woods, City Manager Jeff Kersten, Assistant City Manager Adam Falco, City Attorney Leslie Whitten, Deputy City Attorney Tanya Smith, City Secretary Ian Whittenton, Deputy City Secretary 1. Call to Order and Announce a Ouorum is Present. With a quorum present, the meeting of the College Station City Council was called to order by Mayor Nichols via In -Person and Teleconference at 4:00 p.m. on November 24, 2025, in the Council Chambers of the City of College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas 77840. 2. Executive Session Agenda. In accordance with the Texas Government Code §551.071-Consultation with Attorney, §551.074- Personnel, §551.076-Security and §551.086-Competitive Matters, and the College Station City Council convened into Executive Session at 4:00 p.m. on November 24, 2025, to continue discussing matters pertaining to: 2.1. Consultation with Attorney to seek advice regarding pending or contemplated litigation, to wit: • The City of College Station v. The Public Utility Commission of Texas, Cause No. D-1-GN- 24-005680 in the 200th District Court, Travis County, Texas; and 2.2. Deliberation on the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of a public officer: to wit: • City Manager • City Judge • Internal Auditor CCM 112425 Minutes Page 1 • City Attorney • City Secretary • Council Self -Evaluation 2.3. Deliberation on an offer of financial or other incentives for a business prospect that the Council seeks to have locate, stay or expand in or near the City: to wit: • Security Related to City Hall and Council Chambers. 2.4. Deliberation on a competitive matter as that term is defined in Gov't Code Section 552.133; to wit: • Power Supply 3. The Open Meeting Will Reconvene No Earlier than 6:00 PM from Executive Session and City Council will take action, if any. Executive Session recessed at 6:00 p.m. 4. Pledge of Allegiance, Invocation, consider absence request. Invocation given by Captain John Kimbrough, College Station Fire Department. 5. PRESENTATION - PROCLAMATIONS, AWARDS, AND RECOGNITIONS. 5.1. Presentation proclaiming November 2025 as "Lung Cancer Awareness Month." Mayor Nichols presented a proclamation to Anish Senthil declaring November 2025 as "Lung Cancer Awareness Month." 6. Hear Visitors Comments. Ellen Fuller, College Station, expressed gratitude to the Parks and Rec Department for supporting Wreaths Across America (WAA) Brazos Valley since 2015. She mentioned that the department has helped with the annual WAA Ceremony at Aggie Field of Honor Chapel and with placing flags on veterans' graves for Memorial Day and Veterans Day. Additionally, their support was crucial for "The Wall That Helps-Aggieland" event at Veterans Park in 2023, marking the 50th anniversary of the end of the Vietnam War. Mrs. Fuller stated in appreciation, WAA Brazos Valley is donating 3" by 3" medallions with QR codes for "Find A Grave" to help locate loved ones in both City Cemeteries. Neo Jang, College Station, emphasized that children are a reflection of urban health. With nearly 20% of the population under 18, updating the active transportation master plan to ensure safe routes for walking, biking, or rolling will benefit everyone, including parents with strollers, seniors, and people with disabilities. Mr. Jang noted that safer crossings, continuous sidewalks, and protected bikeways improve access between neighborhoods, parks, and schools. Prioritizing youth mobility in the master plan supports long-term benefits and addresses community needs. Cy Williams, College Station, addressed the Council on parking issues in his neighborhood caused by parents from surrounding areas picking up their children. He stated that these individuals, not neighborhood residents, created daily congestion and safety concerns. Although he supports the restrictions placed for public safety, he requested a policy variance allowing residents to obtain permits to park in front of their homes without frequently moving their vehicles or being ticketed. CCM 112425 Minutes Page 2 7. CONSENT ITEMS Presentation, discussion, and possible action on consent items which consist of ministerial, or "housekeeping" items as allowed by law: A Councilmember may request additional information at this time. Any Councilmember may remove an item from the Consent Agenda for a separate vote. Items (7.4), (7.5) and (7.8) were pulled for clarification. (7.4) Emily Fisher, Public Works Director, explained that the item is for temporarily reducing the speed on State Highway 6 and its frontage roads during upcoming construction. The state mandates access control and sets permanent speed limits, but cities can set temporary ones to accommodate work and safety. The goal is to enhance safety by lowering the speed limit. TXDOT recommended reducing the highway speed limit to 60 mph and the frontage road speed limit to 40-45 mph. (7.5) Gene Ballew, Parks Assistant Director, stated that the park upgrades involve both routine replacements and minor improvements. The current priority is replacing aging playgrounds at Castlegate Park, Mary Oaks Park, and Southern Oaks Park, due to their high usage and age. Additionally, several other playgrounds are scheduled for replacement next year. The objective is to commence the next phase early in 2026, with each replacement project expected to take approximately four to five months. (7.8) Sean Beatty, Police Department, explained that the department's current bomb robot is 18 years old, worn out, and replacement parts are no longer available, necessitating the manufacturing of special parts. The new robot significantly enhances our capabilities by allowing bomb technicians to approach devices without direct contact, thanks to an articulating claw arm capable of reaching behind doors and performing complex movements. Additionally, the new robot features six high-grade cameras for improved manipulation and observation. It also integrates with an X-ray machine, enabling the departments to take photos without directly handling objects. This upgrade will serve an 8-county region and will be utilized in collaboration with other bomb units. Mayor opened for Citizen Comments on Consent Item 7.6 Robert Rose, College Station, urged the Council to act promptly to avoid worsening problems with the water supply. He suggested starting surface water and reclaimed water projects, implementing xeriscaping for new developments and incentivizing existing ones, and introducing cool roof requirements. Mr. Rose noted that the top engineering school near College Station has the potential to lead these efforts. Nicole Gallucci, College Station, emphasized prioritizing immediate action over speculation on water shortages. With the recent lawsuit settlement involving College Station, Bryan, and A&M, a local and statewide water crisis is evident. She suggested commissioning a study to identify effective policies and programs for addressing the shortage now and in the future. Additionally, she proposed selecting three projects to begin in 2026, focusing on actionable strategies rather than future predictions to ensure responsible fund usage. Citizen Comments for Consent Item 7.6 was closed. (7.6) Stephen Maldonado, Assistant Water Director, explained the study's goal to address future water issues by exploring solutions now. He stated that staff provide frequent updates on annual water usage, highlighting a decrease in per capita use despite population growth. They also monitor reuse programs, CCM 112425 Minutes Page 3 new projects, and have added three new wells. This effort combines both regulatory and physical water management, with regular departmental updates. 7.1. Presentation, discussion, and possible action of minutes for: • November 13, 2025 Council Meeting 7.2. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a contract with Utility Restoration Services, Inc. for Annual Padmount Equipment Repair and Restoration in the amount of $499,803.52. 7.3. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on the first reading of a franchise agreement with Professional Trash Valet, LLC DBA Brazos Valley Trash Valet & Recvcling for the collection of recvclables from commercial businesses and multi -family locations. 7.4. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding Ordinance No. 2025-4648 temporarily amending Chapter 38, "Traffic and Vehicles," Article VI "Traffic Schedules," Section 38-1013 "Traffic Schedule XIII, Temporary Speed Limits," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas regarding the speed limits on State Highway 6 and frontage roads. 7.5. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a construction contract with The Plavwell Group, Inc. and PlayWorks, Inc. for the demo and installation of three plavgrounds at Castlegate Park, Merry Oaks Park, and Southern Oaks Park in the amount of $546,591.95 plus the Citv's contingency in the amount of $54,659.19 for a total appropriation of $601,251.14 7.6. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on approval of a cost -sharing Interlocal Agreement with Texas A&M University System (TAMUS), the City of College Station (COCS), the City of Bryan (COB), and the Brazos Valley Groundwater Conservation District (BVGCD) to jointly fund a socioeconomic study assessing the impacts of various Desired Future Condition (DFC) scenarios on the communities and economies of Brazos and Robertson counties, in support of balanced water management and sustainabilitv. College Station's twenty-five percent share of the total study cost will be $46,300. 7.7. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a construction contract with Zone Industries for the repair of a failed final clarifier at the Carters Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant, in the amount of $130,000 plus a City contingency of $13,000 for a total appropriation of $143,000. Approval of this item authorizes the City Manager to approve proiect expenditures up to the contingency amount. 7.8. Presentation, discussion, and possible action to authorize the purchase of the Andros Spartan Bomb Robot in the amount of $335,138 from Peraton Remotec for the College Station Police Department Bomb Squad. MOTION: Upon a motion made by Councilmember Smith and a second by Councilmember White, the City Council voted seven (7) for and none (0) opposed, to approve the Consent agenda. The motion carried unanimously. 8. WORKSHOP ITEMS 8.1. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the 2024 Incentive Compliance Report by the Greater Brazos Partnership. CCM 112425 Minutes Page 4 Brian Piscacek, Economic Development Assistant Director, stated that this item is the annual presentation on project compliance from the Greater Brazos Partnership (GBP). GBP staff, along with representatives of Ryan, LLC, a Texas -based tax services and consulting firm, will be present to provide the report. Nicholas LaColla, Representative of Ryan, LLC, presented the compliance report for 2024 with the Greater Brazos Partnership, stating that Fujifilm is the only active agreement. The report indicated that the Fujifilm is in compliance and the agreement was amended to add $30 million in capital investments and require 150 new full-time jobs with an average salary of $80,000, with compliance monitoring to begin in 2028. MOTION: Upon a motion made by Councilmember Wright and a second by Councilmember Shafer, the City Council voted seven (7) for and none (0) opposed, to approve the 2024 Incentive Compliance Report by the Greater Brazos Partnership. The motion carried unanimously. 8.2. Presentation. discussion, and possible action on the Family Definition and Shared Housing. Anthony Armstrong, Planning and Development Director, stated that the City Council updated the definition of "family" in the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) due to Senate Bill 1567, which restricts mentioning familial status. At the September 1 lth, 2025 meeting, Council requested a future agenda item to address citizen concerns about these changes. Additionally, the definition of "Shared Housing" has been unenforceable since September 1st because it mentions familial status. This item discussed potential updates to both definitions for enforcement purposes. Current Definition and Alternatives: • Family_ A family is any number of persons occunvifP- a sin ie dwelling unit. The term family shall not be construed to mean a club. a lodge, ora fraternity or sorority house. • Functional Family • PrGvacy Model - Current definition aligns with this morel • Character Model - Not al[owed under SB 1567 • Density Model ■ No need to define famiiy • Intentional Community • Single House Keeping Unit • Household (unit) off"' CCM 112425 Minutes Page 5 Shared Housing hared Frou;Ing: A alvarnbal dwelling urY prorldesg complete independent It ng ixilmn designed toks[red msupant a *eels of more 1haA one 11 I bendy. fah ple may be Wei -gilled and alNfrMrwted hpal finite resiaerNal uses ty censlarrInp J Somolrlabfn of struCEU[C nr peep:ref charafterrsticsTbat may if USitt balsa cease amlpancy 10 it re mac one 11 F Forney' Such as: {1E R res moral 'Illr>$ arm coorainInEi more Than Four Ca)hetivnores ix able [o house more than four la} peopleuslrtg other morns such as dens, [Mikes. game rooms. or similar spacesrl.aT have rice {fO[ennel [0 trt used far sleepier., Narcoses in accordance *In TAe !Merca[IE1rla' leeselanaat Code 1.1ROarliNcieth of trabeaiale mace. as adevea: {2E Aeeslderlral VnellIrm ants consarnIrpt a similar bedroven-hrbachroom porn,'# In excess of dour {3E kreidenual dvre111r4 writ tentem,n,g B Intl gummy orberdlrOoma wuallyrn caceS0 err lave vb. at which meiE{aN only be accetted Through d Isearobmar other Malt irxh M a dery office, peed [pone 0r yrmlL2r suns {#E A resldermslip5'elllryg [Al the( ben elrcessof one(11story for she -purpose ar Ap1ltlryg the belldIrrg faotpril4 on tine kt to meet I pen9ous cover req[erer iSt The crew fry Miele the res tic rial d,reaarp role Is Wad deer nee et vain a sarage. or If a eamalas a &acme. can supper[ add.Tranal Irving spare: and[ar {61. The properly .ae4•re[be re—Aerrtiat dweeng unit it agate,/{ Priam a pare-Ing ar achat%al OW parking in Og4FLOrr9ur [di [1rrGIS7 Additional Physical Limitations • State law and Building code follow IPMC -70sf for 1 person bedrooms or 50sf per person in a bedroom_ State Law caps at 3 people allowed per bedroom_ (150sf bedroom min.) • Potential additions to Shared Housing Definition: • Absent Master Bedroom • Remove Impervious Cover relief option • Give additional power to Administrator - would include appeal option • Classify shared housing as Congregate Living Facilities (Fire Sprinkling req.) • Additional parking required when no garage • Council ideas/discussion? Ctr,' Mayor Nichols opened for Citizen Comments. Fred Dupriest, College Station, stated that the way he reads SB 1567 the city can use the word marriage, children related, blood related, or any combination of those words to define a family but cannot use that definition of family to limit the number of occupants. He suggested adopting definition of family as "A family is any number of persons occupying a single dwelling unit, including, but not limited to those related by blood, marriage, adoption, or guardianship." There being no further comments, Citizen Comments was closed. CCM 112425 Minutes Page 6 MOTION: Upon a motion made by Councilmember Yancy and a second by Councilmember Mcllhaney, the City Council voted five (5) for and two (2) opposed, with Mayor Nichols and Councilmember Smith voting against, to approve a definition given and refining it closer to Housing and Urban Development: "A family is defined as any number of individuals occupying a single dwelling unit, including but not limited to those related by blood, marriage, adoption, guardianship, or dependency." The motion carried unanimously. 8.3. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on an update on drainage. Emily Fisher, Public Works Director, emphasized that the city encompasses numerous watersheds, with Bee Creek Watershed being one of the largest within the city limits Bee Creek originates near Aggie Park and flows to Carters Creek, incorporating tributaries from densely developed areas such as Southwood Valley. Emerald Forest is notably affected by Bee Creek, where the floodway is depicted in dark blue on FEMA floodplain panels and the 100-year floodplain in light blue. She stated that the original meandering path of Bee Creek was modified in the early '90s with the creation of a more defined diversion channel Mrs. Fisher explained that although the city has limited access to certain easements, the Council approved funding to remove blockages identified along Bee Creek and this work is anticipated to commence at the start of the year. The Rosewood Channel, also referred to as Bee Creek Tributary 2, extends from Sybesta Road behind residential properties to Bee Creek, passing beneath Emerald Parkway. It exists within a 40-foot drainage easement but has been integrated into residential backyards, with various enhancements made by homeowners. Recent developments near the pavilion and Corsair now divert drainage towards a regional detention pond rather than the Southeast Channel. Storm sewers at new construction sites redirect rainwater to this pond, although sandbags currently guide it to the Rosewood Channel during construction. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS ACTUALS PROJECTED EXPENDITURES PROJECT# TOTAL BUDGET THROUGH FY25 FY26 THROUGH FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30 FY31 DRAINAGE UTILITY FUND 139121 * MINOR DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS SD1701 300.000 300,000 530.585 300,000 300,000 300,000 300.000 300.000 300,000 300.000 ** CULVERT @ MILLIFF/REDMOND 5D1604 2,351,500 2,351,500 - 135,032 1,000,000 189,000 - - - - FUTUREDRAINAGEIMPROVEMENTS SD2400 750,000 - 750,000 - - 750,000 BEE CREEK DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS SDTBD 740.000 - 740.000 - - 740.000 CAPITAL PROJECTS SUBTOTAL S 3,379,046 $ 1,790.000 $ 698,350 52.027,126 51,979,000 S 300,000 $ 539.000 $ 300.000 S 300,000 $ 300.000 This project is budgeted at $300,000 annually. ** Approved appropriations Carried Over from a prior fiscal year. Other Considerations • Complete Bee Creek work • CDBG-MIT Flood Hazard Assessment • Funding for an additional flood study • State Flood Plan participation — future grant opportunities • Update Drainage Master Plan Mayor Nichols opened for Citizen Comments. David Higdon, College Station, raised concerns about the Bee Creek watershed affecting Emerald Forest, especially with potential runoff increase from the Highway 6 expansion. He also has concerns about the new College Station Independent School District administrative offices on Sebesta Road may worsen water drainage issues in Emerald Forest. Discussions with staff have focused on clearing the existing detention pond but are complicated by unclear ownership after the Property Owners Association dissolved. Mr. Higdon noted that new developments would likely need more detention CCM 112425 Minutes Page 7 ponds due to increased concrete surfaces and he urged the Council to prioritize drainage issues and collaborate with Emerald Forest residents for citywide benefit. Cheryl Wenck, College Station, stated that the Bee Creek drainage floodplain is an issue that affects the entire city, not just the Emerald Forest area. She notes that upstream developments from Texas Avenue to Highway 6 contribute additional water without adequate detention measures, which increases creek flow. Mrs. Wenck also believes that nearby developments east of Highway 6 also suffer from insufficient detention, with six new projects depending on inadequate ponds, including those located behind HEB, near Walmart, and at the new CSISD facility. There being no further comments, Citizen Comments was closed. The Council directed staff to prioritize improvements around the channel along Rosewood to address concerns from Emerald Forest residents. 8.4. Presentation. discussion. and possible action regarding recommendations of the Housing Plan Advisory Committee to implement the Housing Action Plan. David Brower, Community Development Administrator, announced that the Council adopted the Housing Action Plan as an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan on September 26, 2024. The Plan aims to increase housing unit production and preserve affordable housing. The Housing Plan Advisory Committee met regularly since April 2025 to review conditions and make recommendations. HPAC Recommendation One Goal 1. Strategy 1. Action 1. Proactively rezone priority areas for townhome and middle housing options specifically to encourage homeownership • Set limits that enable growth toward target development goals • Prioritize rezonings near key activity centers and corridors • Direct growth where infrastructure can adequately serve it HPAC Recommendation Two Goal 1. Strategy 1. Action 3. Reduce or waive fees based on how much of the development is dedicated to affordable housing • Define affordable housing as units rented or sold at below -market rate and restricted to low -and moderate -income households HPAC Recommendation Three Goal 1. Strategy 1. Action 3. Investigate a tiered system for fees, reduce or waive fees for smaller square footage to incentivize new / future development. • Investigate impact on the budget from reduced or waived fees • What would the offset from new development be? • How much new development would offset not having impact fees Committee Chair Jerilyn Nolan reported that since April, the committee has been meeting monthly to develop strategies for increasing affordable housing. They aim to serve essential workers, young families, single -parent households, and retirees on fixed incomes. Currently, there is a gap between housing costs and household incomes in College Station. In October, the median home price was $320,000 but the median income for a three -person household was $79,687, requiring an income of CCM 112425 Minutes Page 8 $98,695 to afford such a home. The committee seeks realistic methods to incorporate more affordable housing without drastic measures, focusing on incentives for builders and developers to include affordable options. Mayor Nichols opened for Citizen Comments. Stephen Grove, College Station, is with Sytlecraft builders and thanked the Council for discussing the Midtown project, which offers homes starting at $230,000 and he considers to be an affordability success. He supports forming a committee and working with the city to find solutions and suggested that reducing land and lot requirements and lowering fees would help lower home prices. He expressed enthusiasm for working with the city to explore policy changes and incentives that could support more affordable housing developments. There being no further comments, Citizen Comments was closed. The Council directed staff to staff to move forward with all three Housing Plan Advisory recommendations. Mayor Nichols recessed the meeting at 9:22 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 9:29p.m. 9. REGULAR ITEMS 9.1. Public Hearing. presentation, discussion. and possible action regarding Ordinance No. 2025- 4649 amending Appendix A. Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4. "Zoning Districts," Section 4.2 "Official Zoning Map." of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas. by changing the zoning district boundaries from GC General Commercial to T Townhouse for approximately 0.0175 acres generally located east of the intersection of Holleman Drive South and Cain Road. Jeff Howell, Planning and Development, explained that the request is to rezone 0.0175 acres east of Holleman Drive South and Cain Road from GC General Commercial to T Townhouse. The area includes an un-platted property and part of a common area platted in October 2024 as Barracks West Phase 1 subdivision. Originally rezoned to GC in 2025, this request aims to extend townhouse zoning by 7 feet for uniform standards in the proposed development. The change seeks to increase housing and residential density and permits townhome development meeting district setback requirements. This item was heard at the November 6th Planning and Zoning Commission meeting where the Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval. At approximately 9:30 p.m., Mayor Nichols opened the Public Hearing. There being no further comments, the Public Hearing was closed at 9:30 p.m. MOTION: Upon a motion made by Councilmember Yancy and a second by Councilmember Mcllhaney, the City Council voted seven (7) for and nine (0) opposed, to adopt Ordinance No. 2025- 4649, amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts," Section 4.2 "Official Zoning Map," of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by changing the zoning district boundaries from GC General Commercial to T Townhouse for CCM 112425 Minutes Page 9 approximately 0.0175 acres generally located east of the intersection of Holleman Drive South and Cain Road. The motion carried unanimously. 9.2. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an Ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 3 "Development Review Procedures", Section 3.5 "Concept Plans (P-MUD and PDD Districts)" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by amending certain sections relating to requirements, concept plans, and community benefits for PDD Planned Development Districts. Jeff Howell from Planning and Development explained that the proposed amendment to the Unified Development Ordinance impacts all new PDD Planned Development Districts. The amendment aims to: • Set minimum standards for each PDD; and • Include selective community benefits standards; and • Differentiate requirements for larger and smaller PDD areas; and • Provide more predictability and clarity; and • Detail elements for minor modifications. Concept Plan Modifications Less than 20 acres • Building square footage of 10% or 2500 sqft • Arrangement and number buildings • Change to setbacks or modifications • Building height by 10% • Substantial arrangement of streets, parking, drive aisles • Reduce common open spaces • Additional grading in conservation area Section Request Reason for amendment Provide predictability and clarification as to More than 20 acres Additional elements for minor what is included as minor. Currently the modifications definition is very broad. • Do not change arrangement of zoning 3.51 Differentiation for larger PDD Allow for modifications to larger PDD areas 4 Meritorious modificationsthat may be more general in nature. Areas {Over 20 acres) The Planning and Zoning Commission discussed this in a June 2024 workshop and requested further feedback. An in -person meeting in July 2024 and a virtual meeting in August 2024 included stakeholders who have applied for PDD rezoning in the past decade. Modifications were made based on feedback, and after consulting with the City Attorney's Office, incorporated into the Unified Development Ordinance. This item was heard at the November 6th Planning and Zoning Commission meeting where the Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval. At approximately 9:40 p.m., Mayor Nichols opened the Public Hearing. Veronica Morgan, College Station, spoke to the Council about needing more time to review the presented ordinance. She has concerns, especially regarding how the ordinance might penalize smaller sites. Mrs. Morgan emphasized the importance of small sites for infill development and neighborhood agreements, suggesting a revision of the point system that seems unfairly difficult for small sites. She urged the Council to allow discussions with staff to reach a consensus on the ordinance. CCM 112425 Minutes Page 10 There being no further comments, the Public Hearing was closed at 9:49 p.m. The City Council directed staff to bring the item back to the Council after staff has had a period of engagement with stakeholders and re -presented the item to the Planning and Zoning Commission. 9.3. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an amendment to the on -street parking removal policy and guidelines to establish minimum street pavement widths for on - street parking. Jennifer Prochazka, Assistant City Manager, stated that on October 23, 2025, the Council directed staff to evaluate design standards to address neighborhood parking issues and ensure access for emergency and public service vehicles in Southside. To improve public services while considering street widths and needs, the recommendations for local residential streets are: • Under 27' wide: Remove on -street parking. • 27' to 32' wide: Remove on -street parking on one side. • 32' to 38' wide: Allow on -street parking on both sides. • Over 38' wide: These are Collector roads and may require bicycle facilities; on -street parking may be removed. • Less than 38' wide but designated as a Collector road: May require bicycle facilities; on -street parking may be removed. These standards align with those for new single-family neighborhoods in College Station. Staff recommend adopting them as guidelines for addressing parking removal in existing residential areas when needed. Mayor Nichols opened for Citizen Comments. Lloyd Davis of College Station proposed a city-wide plan for bike lanes, routes, sidewalks, shared - use paths, and access to schools. He suggested that streets must allow double -sided parking plus emergency or sanitation vehicles; otherwise, double -sided parking is prohibited, including near A&M. It is his recommendation that the city collaborate with Texas A&M and other local stakeholders on options like remote parking with bus service (Park & Ride) or bike racks (Park & Pedal). Additionally, the city should assess campus parking demand and work to increase affordable student housing on and off campus. Ainsleigh Broadwell, Student Government Association (SGA), addressed the Council about the absence of a park and ride system for Texas A&M in College Station. This forces off -campus students to buy expensive parking permits or park in neighborhoods, impacting residents and safety. SGA proposes using existing sites like Post Oak Mall and the International Leadership Academy for a quick, low-cost solution. The SGA endorses collaboration between Texas A&M, College Station, and Bryan to develop this option and plan long-term transit and housing strategies. Fred Dupriest, College Station, came before Council to provide Southside NCO preliminary parking recommendations: 1) Eliminate street parking on curb -less streets; 2) Reassess safety of parking on Fairview in proposed bicycle/pedestrian plan; and 3) Adopt a philosophical expectation that the city is not responsible for guaranteeing parking to commercial investors that can provide it to their (residents) customers. There being no further comments, Citizen Comments was closed. CCM 112425 Minutes Page 11 MOTION: Upon a motion made by Councilmember Yancy and a second by Councilmember Shafer, the City Council voted seven (7) for and none (0) opposed, to approve an amendment to the on -street parking removal policy and guidelines to establish minimum street pavement widths for on -street parking. The motion carried unanimously. 10. Items of Community Interest and Council Calendar: The Council may discuss upcoming events and receive reports from a Council Member or City Staff about items of community interest for which notice has not been given, including: expressions of thanks, congratulations or condolence; information regarding holiday schedules; honorary or salutary recognitions of a public official, public employee, or other citizen; reminders of upcoming events organized or sponsored by the City of College Station; information about a social, ceremonial or community event organized or sponsored by an entity other than the City of College Station that is scheduled to be attended by a Council Member, another city official or staff of the City of College Station; and announcements involving an imminent threat to the public health and safety of people in the City of College Station that has arisen after the posting of the agenda. Nothing to report. 11. Council Reports on Committees, Boards, and Commission: A Council Member may make a report regarding meetings of City Council boards and commissions or meetings of boards and committees on which a Council Member serves as a representative that have met since the last council meeting. (Committees listed in Coversheet) Councilmember Yancy reported on IGC Meeting. 12. Future Agenda Items and Review of Standing List of Council Generated Future Agenda Items: A Council Member may make a request to City Council to place an item for which no notice has been given on a future agenda or may inquire about the status of an item on the standing list of council generated future agenda items. A Council Member's or City Staff s response to the request or inquiry will be limited to a statement of specific factual information related to the request or inquiry or the recitation of existing policy in response to the request or inquiry. Any deliberation of or decision about the subject of a request will be limited to a proposal to place the subject on the agenda for a subsequent meeting. Councilmember Yancy requested a Workshop Item on Towing Policy and City Practices. 13. Adjournment. There being no further business, Mayor Nichols adjourned the meeting of the City Council at 11:03 p.m. on Monday, November 24, 2025. JohP. Nichols, Mayor ATTEST: cly44_044 cDfrndi- Tanya Smith, City Secretary CCM 112425 Minutes Page 12