Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/07/2013 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning Commission д¿²²·²¹ ú Ʊ²·²¹ ݱ³³·­­·±² Ú»¾®«¿®§ éô îðïí ɱ®µ­¸±° Ó»»¬·²¹ êæðð ÐÓ Î»¹«´¿® Ó»»¬·²¹ éæðð ÐÓ  ï AGENDA PLANNING&ZONINGCOMMISSION WM ORKSHOP EETING F7,2013,6:00PM EBRUARY AT CHCC ITY ALLOUNCIL HAMBERS 1101TA EXAS VENUE CS,T OLLEGE TATIONEXAS 1.Call the meeting to order. 2.Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. 3.Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the adoption of the proposed 2013 (J. Schubert) P&Z Plan of Work (see attached). 4.Presentation, discussion, and possible action of a Semi-Annual Report on Impact Fees (C.Cotter) 92-01, 97-01, 97-02B, 99-01, and 03-02. 5.Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an update on the Economic (B. Cowell) Development Master Plan. 6.Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an update on the following items: A rezoning from CI Commercial Industrial, to GC General Commercial, for approximately 1.2 acres at 3800 State Highway 6 South. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on December 6 and voted 6-0 to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on January 10 and voted 7-0 to approve the rezoning request. An amendment to the Unified Development Ordinance, providing a reference to the Easterwood Field Airport Zoning Ordinance. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on December 20 and voted 4-0 to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on January 10 and voted 7-0 to approve the amendment. 7.Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings. Tuesday, February 12, 2013 ~ South Knoll Neighborhood Plan Public Meeting (Biking & Walking Facilities) ~ South Knoll Elementary School cafeteria ~ 7:00 p.m. Thursday, February 14, 2013 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ (Liaison V. Gay) Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, February 18, 2013 ~ Design Workshop for Wellborn District Plan ~ Wellborn Community Center ~ 9:00 a.m. 4:00 p.m. î Monday, February 19, 2013 ~ Design Workshop for Wellborn District Plan ~ Wellborn Community Center ~ 1:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. 7:00 p.m. (Public Presentation) Tuesday, February 19, 2013 ~ South Knoll Neighborhood Plan Public Meeting (HOA & Neighborhood Assoc.) ~ South Knoll Elementary School cafeteria ~ 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, February 26, 2013 ~ South Knoll Neighborhood Plan Public Meeting (On- Street Parking) ~ South Knoll Elementary School cafeteria ~ 7:00 p.m. Thursday, February 21, 2013 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. 8.Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, Joint Parks / Planning & Zoning Subcommittee, South Knoll Neighborhood Plan Resource Team, BioCorridor Committee, Zoning District Subcommittee, Joint Task Force on Neighborhood Parking Issues, and Wellborn District Plan Resource Team. 9.Discussion and possible action on future agenda items A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 10.Adjourn. Consultation with Attorney {Gov't Code Section 551.071} ; possible action. The Planning and Zoning Commission may seek advice from its attorney regarding a pending and contemplated litigation subject or attorney-client privileged information. After executive session discussion, any final action or vote taken will be in public. If litigation or attorney-client privileged information issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, an executive session will be held. Notice is hereby given that a Workshop Meeting of the College Station Planning & Zoning Commission, College Station, Texas will be held on February 7, 2013 at 6:00 PM at City Hall Council Chamber,1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas. The following subjects will be discussed, to wit: See Agenda. Posted this the day of February,2013 at . , CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS By _____________________________ Sherry Mashburn, City Secretary By _____________________________ Frank Simpson, City Manager I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the above Notice of the Workshop Meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of College Station, Texas, is a true and correct copy of said Notice and that I posted a true and correct copy of said notice on the bulletin board at City Hall, 1101 Texas www.cstx.gov. The Agenda and Notice are readily accessible to the general public at all times. Said Notice and Agenda were posted on February ,2013, at and remained so posted continuously for at least 72 hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting. This public notice was removed from the official posting board at the College Station City Hall on the following date and time: ______________________ by _________________________. Dated this _____ day of_____________, 2013. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS By_____________________________ Subscribed and sworn to before me on this the day of_______________, 2013. Notary Public- Brazos County, Texas My commission expires: This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3541 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. Agendas may be viewed onwww.cstx.gov. Planning and Zoning Commission meetings are broadcast live on Cable Access Channel 19. í AGENDA PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RM EGULAR EETING F7,2013,7:00.. EBRUARY AT PM CHCC ITY ALLOUNCIL HAMBERS 1101A TEXAS VENUE CS,T OLLEGE TATIONEXAS 1.Call meeting to order. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. Hear Citizens. 3.At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address the Commission on planning and zoning issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The citizen presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.) All matters listed under Item 4, Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Planning & Zoning Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. There will not be separate discussion of these items. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it will be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration. Consent Agenda 4.. 4.1Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting Minutes. January 17, 2012 ~ Workshop January 17, 2012 ~ Regular Regular Agenda 5.Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. 6.Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an amendment to the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by rezoning approximately 1.27 acres from R-1 Single-Family Residential to O Office for the property located at 1402 Earl Rudder Freeway South, generally located at the northwest corner of the Earl Case #13-900002 Rudder Freeway South frontage road and University Oaks Boulevard. (M. Hester) (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the February 28, 2013 City Council Meeting -subject to change) ì 7.Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an amendment to the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by rezoning approximately 6.3 acres from PDD Planned Development District to PDD Planned Development District Case #12- to amend the concept plan for the property located at 301 Southwest Parkway. 00500247 (T. Rogers) (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the February 28, 2013 City Council Meeting -subject to change) 8.Presentation, discussion, and possible action on an update to the Commission regarding the creation of new residential zoning districts in compliance with the Comprehensive Case #13-00900030 (T. Rogers/J. Prochazka) Plan. 9.Discussion and possible action on future agenda items A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 10.Adjourn. Consultation with Attorney {Gov't Code Section 551.071} ; possible action. The Planning and Zoning Commission may seek advice from its attorney regarding a pending and contemplated litigation subject or attorney- client privileged information. After executive session discussion, any final action or vote taken will be in public. If litigation or attorney-client privileged information issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, an executive session will be held. Notice is hereby given that a Regular Meeting of the College Station Planning & Zoning Commission, College Station, Texas will be held on February 7, 2013 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall Council Chambers,1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas. The following subjects will be discussed, to wit: See Agenda. Posted this the _____ day of February, 2013, at _______ CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS By _____________________________ Sherry Mashburn, City Secretary By _____________________________ Frank Simpson, City Manager I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the above Notice of Meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of College Station, Texas, is a true and correct copy of said Notice and that I posted a true and correct copy of said notice on the bulletin board at www.cstx.gov. The Agenda and Notice are readily accessible to the general public at all times. Said Notice and Agenda were posted on February ___, 2013, at _______ and remained so posted continuously for at least 72 hours preceding the scheduled time of said meeting. This public notice was removed from the official posting board at the College Station City Hall on the following date and time: ______________________ by _________________________. Dated this _____ day of_____________, 2013. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS By_____________________________ Subscribed and sworn to before me on this the day of_______________, 2013. Notary Public- Brazos County, Texas My commission expires: This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicap parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3541 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. Agendas may be viewed on www.cstx.gov.Planning and Zoning Commission meetings are broadcast live on Cable Access Channel 19. ë 2013 Planning & Zoning Commission Plan of Work Comprehensive Plan Implementation Implementation of Adopted Plans Summary:Project Dates: Implementation of adopted master plans and neighborhood, district, and corridor plans, namely: Central College Station, Eastgate, and Southside Area neighborhood plans, and Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways, Parks and Recreation, Water, Waste Water, and Medical District master plans. Staff Assigned: P&DS StaffAnticipated Completion: On-going Wellborn District Plan Summary:Project Dates: 2/11/13: Wellborn Resource Team meeting at Development of a district plan for the recently annexed Greens Prairie Elementary at 6:30 pm. Wellborn area that contains elements of a rural historic community with a unique character that residents of the 2/18/13: Design Charette at Wellborn Community area desire to retain. Center from 9am-4pm. 2/19/13: Design Charette at Wellborn Community Ctr from 1-4pm; Open House 6-7pm Staff Assigned: M. Robinson, L. HovdeAnticipated Completion: Spring 2013 Economic Development Master Plan Summary:Project Dates: 2/7/12: Master Plan update at P&Z Workshop. Development of a Master Plan to provide consistent direction on how the City will help ensure its economic health for years to come while providing a positive business development environment. Staff Assigned: R. HeyeAnticipated Completion: Spring 2013 South Knoll Area Neighborhood Plan Summary:Project Dates: 2/12/13: Public meeting regarding biking and Development of a neighborhood plan for a number of walking at South Knoll Elementary at 7 pm. unique neighborhood areas. The plan area is generally 2/19/13: Public meeting regarding HOAs and bounded by Holleman Drive, Welsh Avenue, Wellborn neighborhood associations at South Knoll Road, Harvey Mitchell Parkway, and Texas Avenue. Elementary at 7 pm. 2/26/13: Public meeting regarding on-street parking at South Knoll Elementary at 7 pm. Staff Assigned: J. Prochazka, M. HesterAnticipated Completion: Summer 2013 Neighborhood Parking Summary:Project Dates: 2/21/13: Task Force Final Report presented at P&Z Analyze neighborhood parking issues by engaging Regular meeting. stakeholders and working in a Joint Task Force Subcommittee with Council. Implement recommended 2/28/13: Task Force Final Report presented at solutions. Council Regular meeting. Staff Assigned: B. Cowell, T. RogersAnticipated Completion: Winter 2012/2013 ê Residential Zoning Districts Summary:Project Dates: Create and adopt new residential zoning districts to 2/7/12: Outline presented at P&Z Regular meeting. implement the future land use and character designations identified in the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Assigned: J. Prochazka, T. RogersAnticipated Completion: Medical District Zoning Districts Summary:Project Dates: Create and adopt Medical and Urban Village zoning districts to implement the new future land use and character designations established by the Medical District Master Plan. Staff Assigned: J. Prochazka, M. RobinsonAnticipated Completion: Research and Education Plan Implementation Summary:Project Dates: The linkage between the Comprehensive Plan, Master Plans, and Neighborhood, District, and Corridor Plans. The linkage between regulations, funding, etc and plan implementation. Staff Assigned: P&DS StaffAnticipated Completion: Character and Urban Design Summary:Project Dates: The purpose and definition of community character, urban design, and the role they play in community vitality and success. Staff Assigned: P&DS Staff Anticipated Completion: Affordable Housing and Community Development Summary:Project Dates: Receive updates regarding affordable housing and other community development efforts. Staff Assigned: P&DS StaffAnticipated Completion: On-going Single-Family and Multi-Family Housing Markets Summary:Project Dates: Discuss impact of large amount of new multi-family units and single-family dwellings being used for student rental purposes on the local housing market. Staff Assigned: P&DS StaffAnticipated Completion: é 1101 Texas Avenue South, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 / Fax 979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM DATE: February 7, 2013 TO:The Planning & Zoning Commission FROM:Carol Cotter, P.E., Sr. Asst. City Engineer SUBJECT:Semi-Annual Report – Impact Fees92-01, 97-01, 97-02B, 99-01, 03-02 Local Government Code requires semi-annual reporting in order to monitor the progress of impact fees and to determine when and update to the fee study is necessary. An update was recommended and is currently under way. There have been no major changes over the last reporting period. Staff recommends that the Advisory Committee forward this report to City Council for their status update. The City of College Station Ordinance Chapter 15, Impact Fees, designates the Planning and Zoning Commission as the Advisory Committee for review, advisement, and monitoring of proposed and existing impact fees. More specifically, the Advisory Committee is established to: 1.Advise and assist the City in adopting Land Use assumptions. 2.Review the Capital Improvements Plan and file written comments. 3.Monitor and evaluate implementation of the Capital Improvements Plan. 4.File semi-annual reports with respect to the progress of the Capital Improvements Plan. 5.Advise the City Council of the need to update or revise the Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvements Plan, and Impact Fees. Currently the City of College Station has five impact fees in existence of which all associated construction is complete. All five of the impact fees underwent a 5-Year Update in either 2008 or 2009 (as noted below) in accordance with State Law. The following is a current statusreport for each of the fiveimpact fees. (To facilitate review data changes from previous 6 months are presented in bold font.): è 92-01Sanitary Sewer (Graham Road )( 508 ac. )__ $316.07/LUE This fee wasinitially implemented in 1992 at$152.18 /LUE and was revised in 1996 to $289.77/LUE after approval of updated Land use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan (CIP), revised again to the $232.04/LUE in 2000 and to the current amount in April of 2008. The CIP consists of three phases originally estimated at $543,000 whichhave all been completed at a combined cost of $473,518.72. Fees collected over the last 6 months are $0.00for total amount of $325,082.55(per Account #250-0000-287.51-13).The remaining amount eligible for collection is about $16,631.The total amountto be recovered through impact fees is anticipated at 72%of original constructioncost. 97-01Sanitary Sewer ( Spring Creek – Pebble Hills) ( 2000 ac.) $98.39/LUE This fee was implementedin December 1997at $349.55/LUE and was revised to the current amount in April of 2008. The CIP consists of Phase I (east of Hwy 6 ) and Phase II (west of Hwy 6 ). Phase I estimated to cost $1,000,000 was completed in 1999 at a cost of $631,214.59. Phase II was estimated to cost $1,350,000andwas completed at a cost of $813,752.00. The total actual cost was $1,444,966.59. Fees collected over the last 6 months are $5,017.90for total amount of $575,703.70(per Acct #251-0000-287.51-13). The remaining amount eligible for collection is about $181,193. The total amount to be recovered through impact fees is anticipated at 52% of original constructioncost. 97-02B Sanitary Sewer ( Alum Creek – Nantucket) ( 608 ac. )$59.42/LUE This fee was implemented inDecember 1997at 243.38/LUE and was revised to the current amount in April of 2008. The CIP consisted of running a 15" sanitary sewer line from the south end of the College Station Business Park westerly along Alum Creek to the east ROW of Highway 6. The project was estimated to cost $390,000 and was completed in 1999 at a cost of $214,270.87. Feescollected over the last 6 months are $237.68for total amount of $22,068.65(per Acct #252- 0000-287.51-13). The remaining amount eligible for collection is about $181,536. The total amount to be recovered through impact fees is anticipatedat 95% of original construction cost. 99-01Water ( Harley )( 158 ac. )$769.91/LUE This fee was implemented in April 1999at $550.00/LUE and was revised to the current amount in April of 2008. The CIP consists of running an 18" water line south along the east ROW of Highway 6 approximately 4800'. The line was estimated to cost $312,000 (the impact fee is based on an 8" line @ $165,000 ). A 2400' section of the 18" line was constructed in 1999 from the south end at a total cost of $342,977.73. Fees collected over the last 6 months are $0.00for total amount of $64,740.88(per Acct #240-0000-287.51-13). The remaining amount eligible for collection is about $246,372. The total amount to be recovered through impact fees is anticipated at 91% of original constructioncost. ç 03-02 Sanitary Sewer (Steeplechase) (715 ac. ) $357.74/LUE This fee was initially implemented in June 2003 at$300.00/LUEand was revised to the current amount in May of 2009.This CIP was constructed in two phases of sanitary sewer line construction in compliance with the proposed construction in the original report establishing the fee. Phase one crossed Wellborn Road and terminated at Old Wellborn Road consisting of 2,347 linear feet of 18 inch sewer line with a construction cost of $296,642. Phase two was completed in 2006 and continued the line along Old Wellborn Road and terminated across RPR West. Phase two consisted of 6,281 linear feet of 12 inch line and 2,062 linear feet of 18 inch line for a construction cost of $529,088 and a land cost of $87,133. The design cost for the combined phases was $148,023. The total actual cost was $1,091,886 which was less than the original report estimated at $1,596,137.Fees collectedover the last 6 months are $4,650.62for total amount of $97,157.82(per Acct #253-0000-287.51-13). The remaining amount eligible for collection is about $698,001. The total amount to be recovered through impact fees is anticipated at 72% of original construction cost. A previous reportshowed changes in the projected densities in several of the Impact Fee areas related to the Land Uses adopted with theComprehensive Land Use Plan in2009.As presented in the Table below, the densities expectedwith the Land Use Plan adopted in 2009 are significantly different in several of the Impact Fee Areas.An update to incorporate these changes had beenin progress butneededto consider the Water and WastewaterMaster Plans that wereunder development,as well as, a City Wide Impact Fee Study that wasunderway.With the completion of both projects, the update is now proceeding and will be presentedin the coming months. Remaining EffectiveCurrentAnticipated LUECapital Impact Fee AreaBuildoutImpact Buildout AdjustmentInvestment LUEFee RateLUE to Recoup 1775+ 224$ 17,000 92-01 Graham1551$ 316.07 8384+3959$181,000 97-01 Spring Creek4425$ 98.39 2139-1093$182,000 97-02B Alum3232$ 59.42 440-10$246,000 99-01 Harley450$ 769.91 7816+ 4987$698,000 03-02 Steeplechase2838$ 357.74 Total$1,324,000 Attachments:Impact Fee Service Areas Map Land Use at Adoption Mapper Impact Fee Area Current Land Use Mapper Impact Fee Area ïð ïî ïí ïì ïë ïê Ûºº»½¬·ª» Ô¿²¼ Ë­» Ý«®®»²¬ Ô¿²¼ Ë­» Ü»²­·¬§ ÔËÛñß½®» Ü»²­·¬§ ÔËÛñß½®» ïòðð ðòðð ïòêîøïòèé÷ ïòðð îòïð øîòíí÷ ðòîð îòèé øíòðï÷ ïòðð êòëç ìòïç øèòð÷ ìòëî øîð÷ ïíòê ìòðé øëòë÷ íòééøìòëë÷ íòééøìòëë÷ ìòðé øëòëë÷ ïòêî øîòð÷ ðòðð îòðð ïíòðð ðòì ðòðð ìòë ðòîð ðòðð öøý÷ ·²¼·½¿¬»­ ÔËÛ º±® É¿¬»® ׳°¿½¬ Ú»» ß®»¿ ¿²¼ ±²´§ ¿°°´·»­ ¬± ¬¸» ççóðï Ø¿®´»§ ׳°¿½¬ Ú»» ß®»¿ò ïé Ó×ÒËÌÛÍ ÐÔßÒÒ×ÒÙ ú ÆÑÒ×ÒÙ ÝÑÓÓ×ÍÍ×ÑÒ É±®µ­¸±° Ó»»¬·²¹ Ö¿²«¿®§ ïéô îðïíô êæíð °ò³ò Ý·¬§ Ø¿´´ ݱ«²½·´ ݸ¿³¾»®­ ݱ´´»¹» ͬ¿¬·±²ô Ì»¨¿­ COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Mike Ashfield, Jodi Warner, Brad Corrier, Bo Miles and Jerome Rektorik COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Jim Ross and Vergel Gay CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: None CITY STAFF PRESENT: Bob Cowell, Lance Simms, Jason Schubert, Matt Robinson, Joe Guerra, Adam Falco, Jordan Wood, Jennifer Pate, and Brittany Caldwell 1.Call the meeting to order. Chairman Ashfield called the meeting to order at 6:26 p.m. 2.Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. Chairman Ashfield stated that the applicant requested that Regular Agenda Item 6 be removed from the agenda. There was general discussion amongst the Commission regarding Consent Agenda Item 4.3. 3.Discussion of Minor and Amending Plats approved by Staff. Final Plat ~ Amending Plat ~ Sandstone Addition ~ Lots 5R1 & 5R2 ~ 2008 Oakwood (M. Hester) Trail Principal Planner Schubert reviewed the Amending Plat reviewed by Staff. 4.Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the status of items within the 2012 P&Z Plan of Work and the development of the draft 2013 P&Z Plan of Work (see (J. Schubert) attached). Principal Planner Schubert gave an update regarding the 2012 P&Z Plan of Work. 5.Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an update on Texas A&M Design (B. Cowell) Week. Executive Director Cowell gave an update on Texas A&M Design Week. January 17, 2013 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 2 ïè 6.Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings. Thursday, January 24, 2013 ~ Joint City Council and Planning & Zoning Workshop (Liaison Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. B. Corrier) Thursday, February 7, 2013 ~ Planning & Zoning Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. Thursday, February 14, 2013 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ (Liaison V. Gay) Workshop 6:00 p.m. and Regular 7:00 p.m. Chairman Ashfield reviewed the upcoming meeting dates with the Planning and Zoning Commission. 7.Discussion, review and possible action regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board, Joint Parks / Planning & Zoning Subcommittee, South Knoll Neighborhood Plan Resource Team, BioCorridor Committee, Zoning District Subcommittee, Joint Task Force on Neighborhood Parking Issues, and Wellborn District Plan Resource Team. Commissioner Warner gave an update regarding the South Knoll Neighborhood Plan. Senior Planner Robinson gave an update regarding the Wellborn District Plan. 8.Discussion and possible action on future agenda items A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. There was no discussion regarding future agenda items. 9.Adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 6:57p.m. Approved: Attest: ______________________________ ________________________________ Mike Ashfield, Chairman Brittany Caldwell, Admin. Support Specialist Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services January 17, 2013 P&Z Workshop Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 2 ïç Ó×ÒËÌÛÍ ÐÔßÒÒ×ÒÙ ú ÆÑÒ×ÒÙ ÝÑÓÓ×ÍÍ×ÑÒ Î»¹«´¿® Ó»»¬·²¹ Ö¿²«¿®§ ïéô îðïíô éæðð °ò³ò Ý·¬§ Ø¿´´ ݱ«²½·´ ݸ¿³¾»®­ ݱ´´»¹» ͬ¿¬·±²ô Ì»¨¿­ COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Mike Ashfield, Jodi Warner, Brad Corrier, Bo Miles and Jerome Rektorik COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Jim Ross and Vergel Gay CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Jess Fields CITY STAFF PRESENT: Bob Cowell, Lance Simms, Jason Schubert, Matt Robinson, Joe Guerra, Adam Falco, Jordan Wood, Jennifer Pate, and Brittany Caldwell Call Meeting to Order 1. Chairman Ashfieldcalled the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Hear Citizens 3. No one spoke. Consent Agenda 4. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. 4.1Consideration, discussion, and possible action on Absence Requests from meetings. Jim Ross ~ January 3 Mike Ashfield ~ January 3 4.2Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting Minutes. December 20, 2012 ~ Workshop December 20, 2012 ~ Regular January 3, 2013 ~ Workshop January 3, 2013 ~ Regular January 17, 2013 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 2 îð 4.3Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for the Castlegate II Section 100 Subdivision consisting of 41 lots on 12.437 acres located at 4298 W.S. Case #12- Phillips Parkway, generally located west of the Castlegate Subdivision. 00500237 (M. Robinson) Commissioner Miles motioned to approve Consent Agenda Items 4.1 4.3. Commissioner Rektorik seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). Regular Agenda 5.Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. No items were removed from the Consent Agenda. 6.Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an amendment to Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance", Section 4.2, "Official Zoning Map" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by rezoning approximately 6.3 acres located at 301 Southwest Parkway from PDD Planned Development District to Case # 12-00500247 PDD Planned Development District to amend the Concept Plan. (T.Rogers) (Note: Final action on this item is scheduled for the February 14, 2013 City Council Meeting -subject to change) This item was removed from the agend 7.Discussion and possible action on future agenda items A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. There was no discussion regarding future agenda items. 8.Adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 7:02 p.m. Approved: Attest: ______________________________ ________________________________ Mike Ashfield, Chairman Brittany Caldwell, Admin. Support Specialist Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services January 17, 2013 P&Z Regular Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 2 îï REZONING REQUEST FOR EARL RUDDER AT UNIVERISTY OAKS BUSINESS PARK 13-00900002 REQUEST: R-1 Single-Family Residential to O Office SCALE: One lot on approximately 1.27 acres LOCATION: 1402 Earl Rudder Fwy S APPLICANTS: Glenn Jones, J4 Engineering PROJECT MANAGER: Morgan Hester,Staff Planner mhester@cstx.gov PROJECT OVERVIEW: The request is to rezone a 1.27-acre tract to O Office so that the site may be developedfor uses other than R-1 Single-Family Residential as it is currently designated. The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Mapwas recently amended for this tract from General Suburban to Suburban Commercialso that more uses would be permitted. The property owner plans to develop the lot with office usesutilizing access from the frontage road of Earl Rudder Freeway South. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approvalof the proposed rezoning based on its compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map. îî îí îì NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date:February 7, 2013 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: February 28, 2013 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: N/A Property owner notices mailed: 13 Contacts in support:N/A Contacts in opposition:N/A Inquiry contacts:None at the time of this report. ADJACENT LAND USES DirectionComprehensivePlanZoningLand Use North General SuburbanR-1 Single-Family Single-Family Homes Residential South(across Natural Areas –GC General Vacant University Oaks Reservedand Urban Commercial Blvd) Redevelopment East(across Earl General CommercialGC General Sam’s Club, Lock & Rudder Freeway CommercialRoll Storage South) WestGeneral SuburbanR-1 Single-Family Single-Family Homes Residential DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: 1958 Zoning: R-1 Single-Family Residential Final Plat: This property is currently unplatted. Site development: Vacant REVIEW CRITERIA 1.Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject property is designated as Suburban Commercial on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map. The proposed rezoning is consistent with this designation. 2.Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood: The proposed rezoning will allow for the development of offices which typically generate lower trafficcounts and requires limited identification. 3.Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The proposed îë rezoning is appropriate for this area due to its location onthe frontage road of Earl Rudder Freeway South and its proximity to single-family land uses. 4.Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: Currently, the subject property is zoned R-1 Single-Family which is not suitable for this area due to it only having frontage to Earl Rudder Freeway S. As an office use, the development will act as a buffer to the single-family development. 5.Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The current zoning is not marketable to single-family development due to its proximity to Earl Rudder Freeway South and basic site constraints. 6.Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for the proposed use: There are existing 6- and 12-inch water mains available to serve thisproperty. There is adequate sanitary sewer capacity in the downstream system to accommodate the proposed use, however sewer mains will still need to be extended to serve the property with site development. Drainage is mainly to the south within the Carters Creek Drainage Basin. Access to the site will be available via the Earl Rudder Freeway South Frontage Road. Drainage and other public infrastructure required with site development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design Guidelines. Existing infrastructure, with the exception of the referenced sanitary sewer extension, appears to be adequate for the proposed use. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the proposed rezoning based on its compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1.Application 2.Rezoning map îê îé îè îç REZONING REQUEST FOR COPPER CREEK CONDOS 12-00500247 REQUEST: PDD Planned Development District to PDD Planned Development District to amend the Concept Plan. SCALE: One lot on approximately 6.3 acres LOCATION: 301 Southwest Pkwy APPLICANT: Alton Ofczarzak, TDG Management, LP PROJECT MANAGER: Teresa Rogers, Staff Planner trogers@cstx.gov PROJECT OVERVIEW: This request is to amend the Concept Plan of this PDD Planned Development District. The existing Concept Plan currently allows the development of 1, 2, and 3 bedroom units. It requires the preservation of the floodplain as open space and the development of a multi-use path. Under the current Concept Plan, the development must meet neighborhood protection standards, including increased buffer standards and height restrictions. The applicant is requesting modifications to the parking and building layout adjacent to single-family residential properties. The amendment of the Concept Plan also includes a revision to the number of bedrooms allowed, a reduction in the total number of units, and the addition of a building, office, and pool, while increasing the number of bedrooms, partially located in the existing floodplain. Most significantly, a modification to the existing floodplain has been proposed. At the time of this report the revised study addressing floodplain modifications fails to demonstrate that the proposal does not impact the subject property or adjacent properties where known flooding of parking and structures occurs. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the rezoning. Planning and Zoning Commission Page 1 of 7 February 7, 2013 íï Planning and Zoning Commission Page 2 of 7 February 7, 2013 íî Planning and Zoning Commission Page 3 of 7 February 7, 2013 íí NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: February 7, 2013 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: February 28, 2013 The following neighborhood or Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: None Property owner notices mailed: 29 Contacts in support: None Contacts in opposition: None Inquiry contacts: 2 ADJACENT LAND USES DirectionComprehensive PlanZoningLand Use North General SuburbanR-1 Single-Family single-family Residentialresidences, Southland Subdivision South (across General Commercial and PDD Planned undeveloped Southwest Natural Areas Development District Parkway) Reserved East Natural Areas R-4 Multi-Familyapartment complex Reserved, Urban West General CommercialGC General shopping center Commercial DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: 1969 Zoning: R-1 Single-Family Residential upon annexation (1969), R-1 Single-Family Residential to C-1 General Commercial (1975) C-1 General Commercial to PDD Planned Development District (2010) Final Plat: Subject property was final platted as part of William Brooke Hunter Estates in 2004 and subsequently replatted in 2006. Site development: A portion of the property has been developed as a driveway access for the existing Southwest Crossing shopping center. In 2009, portions of the site, including part of the Natural Areas Reserved, were graded and filled to accommodate commercial development. Planning and Zoning Commission Page 4 of 7 February 7, 2013 íì REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject property is designated as Urban and Natural Areas Reserved on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map. The Concept Plan depicts buildings and a pool in the existing 100-year floodplain. Therefore, the proposed rezoning is not consistent with this designation. 2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood: The existing zoning and conforming uses of nearby property are consistent with the proposed use. The proposed multi-family use specified in the PDD is compatible with existing multi-family developments that exist primarily along Southwest Parkway from Welsh Avenue to Wellborn Road. In addition, multi- family uses can serve as a step down intensity from more intense commercial development. The subject property and the adjacent multi-family development to the east are bound by 100-year floodplain and floodway. There is known flooding in the area including flooding of adjacent homes. The applicant has not demonstrated that the proposed development will not further impact adjacent properties.There may also be design and long-term maintenance impacts as a result of the proposed floodplain alterations on the proposed multi-use path. 3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment: The proposed PDD would permit the development of multi-family dwelling units. The property is suitable for the development of multi-family uses. However, further data is needed from the applicant to confirm the impact of the revised floodplain. Asmall portion of the property is proposed to remain undeveloped, to function in its natural state, as floodplain with the exception of a proposed multi-use path as shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian and Greenways Master Plan. The proposed Concept Plan depicts a pool, office structure, and portion of one residential building in the existing 100-year floodplain. A revised floodplain study has been submitted by the applicant, additional data and analysis is necessary to determine if these structures remain in the 100-year floodplain in the proposed configuration and of any associated impacts on the floodplain and surrounding properties. 4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The property is currently zoned PDD Planned Development District, which allows for the development of multi-family uses. Any planned development on the subject property will be required to utilize the shared driveway access off of Southwest Parkway that currently exists. 5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment: The property can currently be marketed under the existing PDD Planned Development District zoning. However, special planning should be done with regard to the existing floodplain located on the property. 6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for the proposed use: There is an existing 12-inch water main available to serve this property. Sanitary sewer service to the property is available via an existing 10-inch main. Drainage is mainly to the east within the drainage basin of Bee Creek Planning and Zoning Commission Page 5 of 7 February 7, 2013 íë Tributary B. The property is partially encumbered by 100-year floodplain and floodway. All utilities shall be designed in accordance with BCS Unified Design Guidelines at the time of site development. Access to the property is available through Southwest Parkway or an existing 50-foot Access Easement with the adjacent property to the west. Existing utilities and access are adequate for the proposed use at this time. REVIEW OF CONCEPT PLAN The following land uses are proposed for the PDD: natural areas of floodplain and open space; and multi-family residential units consisting of approximately 12 dwelling units per acre. The stated purpose statement of the PDD is as follows: -family development. The project will preserve the floodplain as open space and dedicate and develop a multi-use path as shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan. The development will meet neighborhood protection standards to protect the single- The Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) provides the following review criteria for PDD Concept Plans: 1. The proposal will constitute an environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding area; The applicant has proposed a multi- family residential land use, which conforms to the existing character along the segment of Southwest Parkway from Welsh Avenue to Wellborn Road. The majority of property within this area is developed as some form of multi-family dwelling. The Concept Plan calls for the preservation of the flood plain as open space, however the applicant is proposing structures in the existing floodplain. The applicant has proposed a revised floodplain line, but this study does not provide enough detailed information to demonstrate that there will not be impacts on this and adjacent properties.Additional data and analysis is necessary. 2. The proposal is in conformity with the policies, goals, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, and any subsequently adopted Plans, and will be consistent with the intent and purpose of this Section: The proposed Concept Plan is not in conformity with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan because it is not sensitive to its surroundings. Approximately one third of the property is in the floodplain and should remain undeveloped as open space with the exception of the proposed multi-use path. The applicant has failed to provide the necessary data to ensure that the floodplain will be adequately preserved and not adversely impact surrounding properties. In addition, the Concept Plan proposes the development and dedication of a multi- and Greenways Master Plan, but does not take in to consideration additional costs and . design considerations that may be necessary if the floodplain is further revised 3. The proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not adversely affect adjacent development: Currently, it is unknown if the proposed development will adversely affect the adjacent developments. Additional revised data is necessary from the revised floodplain study in order to determine if flooding issues will be increased with the construction of this development 4. Every dwelling unit need not front on a public street but shall have access to a public street directly or via a court, walkway, public area, or area owned by a homeowners association: The proposed development will take access to Southwest Parkway via a shared driveway access with the Southwest Crossing shopping center to the west and have Planning and Zoning Commission Page 6 of 7 February 7, 2013 íê at least one access point within the development to the multi-use path. 5. The development includes provision of adequate public improvements, including, but not limited to, parks, schools, and other public facilities: The development includes the dedication and development of a multi-use path as shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian and Greenways Master Plan. At the April 13, 2010 Parks and Recreation Advisory Board meeting, the Board approved the request to allocate a portion of Parkland Dedication funds towards the development and construction of the multi-use path. 6. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity: The Concept Plan proposes modifications to the existing floodplain. It is unknown at this time if the development will be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 7. The development will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle, or pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use and other uses reasonably anticipated in the area considering existing zoning and land uses in the area: The increased number of trips of 33 vehicles at the peak hour will have minimal affect on the transportation system and no Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is required. However, due to the location of the proposed multi- use path, mid block safety improvements will have to be provided such as a raised median for pedestrian refuge, signage, pavement markers and pedestrian flashers. This improvement would also help with the current safety concern of students crossing at this location for the existing bus stop. These improvements will be the responsibility of the City to provide at a future date. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends denial of the proposed rezoning. SUPPORTING MATERIALS 1. Application 2. Rezoning map 3. Existing Concept Plan (adopted on 7/8/2010, ordinance no. 3256) 4. Proposed Concept Plan Planning and Zoning Commission Page 7 of 7 February 7, 2013 íé íè íç ìð ìï ìî ìí ïïðï Ì»¨¿­ ߪ»²«»ô ÐÑ Þ±¨ ççêð ݱ´´»¹» ͬ¿¬·±²ô Ì»¨¿­ ééèìî и±²» çéçòéêìòíëéð ñ Ú¿¨ çéçòéêìòíìçê ÓÛÓÑÎßÒÜËÓ Ö¿²«¿®§ íðô îðïí ÌÑæ ̸» д¿²²·²¹ ú Ʊ²·²¹ ݱ³³·­­·±² ÚÎÑÓæ Ì»®»­¿ α¹»®­ô ͬ¿ºº д¿²²»® ÍËÞÖÛÝÌæ λ­·¼»²¬·¿´ Ʊ²·²¹ Ü·­¬®·½¬­ ׬»³æ Ю»­»²¬¿¬·±²ô °±­­·¾´» ¿½¬·±²ô ¿²¼ ¼·­½«­­·±² ±² ¿² «°¼¿¬» ¬± ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ®»¹¿®¼·²¹ ¬¸» ½®»¿¬·±² ±º ²»© ®»­·¼»²¬·¿´ ¦±²·²¹ ¼·­¬®·½¬­ ·² ½±³°´·¿²½» ©·¬¸ ¬¸» ݱ³°®»¸»²­·ª» д¿²ò Ý¿­» ýïíóððçðððíð Ѿ¶»½¬·ª»æ ׳°´»³»²¬¿¬·±² ±º ¬¸» ݱ³°®»¸»²­·ª» д¿² ¬¸®±«¹¸ ¬¸» ½®»¿¬·±² ¿²¼ ½±²­±´·¼¿¬·±² ±º ¦±²·²¹ ¼·­¬®·½¬­ ¿²¼ ¿­­±½·¿¬»¼ ¿³»²¼³»²¬­ ¬± ¬¸» Ý·¬§ ±º ݱ´´»¹» ͬ¿¬·±² ˲·º·»¼ Ü»ª»´±°³»²¬ Ñ®¼·²¿²½» øËÜÑ÷ò Þ¿½µ¹®±«²¼æ ̸» ݱ³°®»¸»²­·ª» д¿² ©¿­ ¿¼±°¬»¼ ·² îððç ¿²¼ ¿½¬­ ¿­ ¿ ¹«·¼» ¬± »²­«®» ¬¸» ¹±¿´­ ¿²¼ ±¾¶»½¬·ª»­ ±º ¬¸» Ý·¬§ ¿®» ·³°´»³»²¬»¼ ¾§ ¿½¬·²¹ ¿­ ¿ ´±²¹ó®¿²¹» °´¿²²·²¹ ¿²¼ °±´·½§ ­¬®«½¬«®» º±® º«¬«®» ¹®±©¬¸ ±º ¬¸» Ý·¬§ò ̸» ݱ³°®»¸»²­·ª» д¿² ¿°°®±¿½¸»­ ¬¸» ¹®±©¬¸ ±º ݱ´´»¹» ͬ¿¬·±² ·² ¿ ³¿²²»® ¼·ºº»®»²¬ º®±³ ¬¸» Ý·¬§­ °®»ª·±«­ °´¿²­å ·¬ º±½«­»­ ±² ¬¸» ½®»¿¬·±² ¿²¼ »²¸¿²½»³»²¬ ±º °´¿½»­ ±º ¼·­¬·²½¬·±² ·² ݱ´´»¹» ͬ¿¬·±²ò ̸» д¿² ®»½±¹²·¦»­ ¬¸» ·³°±®¬¿²½» ±º ½¸¿®¿½¬»® ¿²¼ ½¿°·¬¿´·¦»­ ±² ¬¸¿¬ ¬± ±ºº»® ¬¸» ¹®»¿¬»­¬ º´»¨·¾·´·¬·»­ º±® ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ô ©¸·´» °®±¬»½¬·²¹ ­°»½·¿´ °´¿½»­ò ̸» ݱ³°®»¸»²­·ª» д¿² ·¼»²¬·º·»­ ïë «²·¯«» Ú«¬«®» Ô¿²¼ Ë­» ¿²¼ ݸ¿®¿½¬»® ¼»­·¹²¿¬·±²­ ¿²¼ ½¿´´­ º±® ¬¸» ½®»¿¬·±² ±º ¦±²·²¹ ¼·­¬®·½¬­ ¬¸¿¬ ¿´·¹² ©·¬¸ ¬¸» ±¾¶»½¬·ª»­ ±º ¬¸» д¿² ¿­ ±²» ³»¿²­ ±º ·³°´»³»²¬¿¬·±²ò ̸» ·²¬»²¬ ·­ ¬¸¿¬ ²»© ¦±²·²¹ ¼·­¬®·½¬­ ¾» ¼»ª»´±°»¼ º±® »¿½¸ ±º ¬¸» ´¿²¼ «­» ½´¿­­·º·½¿¬·±²­ ¬± ¾±¬¸ ¿´·¹² ©·¬¸ ¬¸» ·²¬»²¬ ±º ¬¸» ݱ³°®»¸»²­·ª» д¿² ¿²¼ ¬± ­·³°´·º§ ¬¸» ²±³»²½´¿¬«®»ò Ʊ²·²¹ ¿²¼ ·¬­ ¿­­±½·¿¬»¼ ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ ½®·¬»®·¿ ¸»´° ¬± »²­«®» ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» º±®³ô ½¸¿®¿½¬»®ô ¿²¼ ¯«¿´·¬§ ±º ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ ®»º´»½¬ ¬¸» Ý·¬§­ °´¿²²·²¹ ±¾¶»½¬·ª»­ò ̸» ݱ³°®»¸»²­·ª» д¿²­ ݱ²½»°¬ Ó¿° ·¼»²¬·º·»­ Ù®±©¬¸ ß®»¿­ ¬¸»­» ¿®» ¿®»¿­ ©¸»®» º«¬«®» ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ ·­ »¨°»½¬»¼ ¬± ¸¿ª» ´·¬¬´» ·³°¿½¬ ±² »¨·­¬·²¹ ²»·¹¸¾±®¸±±¼­ò Ù®±©¬¸ ß®»¿­ ¿®» ·²¬»²¼»¼ ¬± ¸¿ª» ¹®»¿¬»® ³¿®µ»¬ º´»¨·¾·´·¬§ ¿²¼ »¨°¿²¼»¼ ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ ±°¬·±²­ô ©¸·´» °®±ª·¼·²¹ ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ ¬¸¿¬ »²¸¿²½»­ ¬¸» ±ª»®¿´´ ½¸¿®¿½¬»® ±º ¬¸» Ý·¬§ò Ý«®®»²¬´§ô ¬¸» Ý·¬§ ®»½±³³»²¼­ô ¿²¼ ¼»ª»´±°»®­ñ°®±°»®¬§ ±©²»®­ ¸¿ª» «­»¼ô д¿²²»¼ Ü»ª»´±°³»²¬ Ü·­¬®·½¬­ øÐÜÜ­÷ ¬± ·³°´»³»²¬ ¬¸» д¿² ·² Ù®±©¬¸ ß®»¿­ò ײ ¬¸» ­¸±®¬ó¬»®³ô ·¬ ·­ »¨°»½¬»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ÐÜÜ­ ©·´´ ½±²¬·²«» ¬± ¾» «­»¼ò ײ ¬¸» º«¬«®»ô ·¬ ·­ »¨°»½¬»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ¦±²·²¹ ­°»½·º·½ ¬± Ù®±©¬¸ ß®»¿­ ©·´´ ¾» ½®»¿¬»¼ ¬± ®»¼«½» ¬¸» ²«³¾»® ±º ­¬»°­ ·² ¬¸» ¦±²·²¹ °®±½»­­ô ©¸·´» ­¬·´´ °®±ª·¼·²¹ ¬¸» º´»¨·¾·´·¬§ ¬¸¿¬ ©¿­ ·²¬»²¼»¼ò 1 ß°°®±¿½¸æ ͬ¿ºº ¸¿­ ¼»ª»´±°»¼ ¿ °¸¿­»¼ ¿°°®±¿½¸ ¬± ¬¸» ½®»¿¬·±² ¿²¼ ¿¼±°¬·±² ±º ¬¸» ²»© ¦±²·²¹ ¼·­¬®·½¬­ô ©¸·½¸ ¸¿ª» ¾»»² ½¿¬»¹±®·¦»¼ ·²¬± ²±²ó®»­·¼»²¬·¿´ô ®»­·¼»²¬·¿´ô ¿²¼ ¹®±©¬¸ ¿®»¿ ¼·­¬®·½¬­ò ̸» ½±³°´»¬·±² ±º и¿­» × ®»­«´¬»¼ ·² ¬¸» ¿¼±°¬·±² ±º ²»© ²±²ó®»­·¼»²¬·¿´ ¦±²·²¹ ¼·­¬®·½¬­ ¾§ ݱ«²½·´ ·² Í»°¬»³¾»® îðïîò Ò»© ¼·­¬®·½¬­ ·²½´«¼» ÒßÐ Ò¿¬«®¿´ ß®»¿­ Ю»­»®ª»¼ô ÍÝ Í«¾«®¾¿² ݱ³³»®½·¿´ô ÞÐ Þ«­·²»­­ п®µô ¿²¼ ÞÐ× Þ«­·²»­­ п®µ ײ¼«­¬®·¿´ò ߬ ¬¸¿¬ ¬·³»ô »¨·­¬·²¹ ²±²ó®»­·¼»²¬·¿´ ¼·­¬®·½¬­ ©»®» »·¬¸»® ®»²¿³»¼ ±® ®»¬·®»¼ ¿­ °¿®¬ ±º ¬¸» ¿³»²¼³»²¬­ ¬± ¬¸» ˲·º·»¼ Ü»ª»´±°³»²¬ Ñ®¼·²¿²½»ò ͬ¿ºº ©·´´ ²±© ©±®µ ©·¬¸ ¿ ­«¾ó½±³³·¬¬»» ±º ¬¸» д¿²²·²¹ ú Ʊ²·²¹ ݱ³³·­­·±² ¬± ½®»¿¬» ¬¸» ²»© ®»­·¼»²¬·¿´ ¦±²·²¹ ¼·­¬®·½¬­ò Ò»© ®»­·¼»²¬·¿´ ¼·­¬®·½¬­ ©·´´ ·²½´«¼» ÎÎî Ϋ®¿´ λ­·¼»²¬·¿´ î ¿½®»­ô Û Û­¬¿¬»ô ÎÍ Î»­¬®·½¬»¼ Í«¾«®¾¿²ô ÙÍ Ù»²»®¿´ Í«¾«®¾¿²ô Ë Ë®¾¿²ô ËÑ Ë®¾¿² Ñ°»²ô ¿²¼ ËÓË Ë®¾¿² Ó·¨»¼óË­»ò ß¹¿·²ô ©·¬¸ ¬¸»­» ¿³»²¼³»²¬­ô »¨·­¬·²¹ ®»­·¼»²¬·¿´ ¼·­¬®·½¬­ ©·´´ ¾» »·¬¸»® ®»²¿³»¼ ±® ®»¬·®»¼ò Ѳ½» ¬¸» ®»­·¼»²¬·¿´ ¼·­¬®·½¬­ ¿®» ¿¼±°¬»¼ô ͬ¿ºº ©·´´ ¾»¹·² ©±®µ ±² ¿ ­°»½·º·½ ¦±²·²¹ ¿°°®±¿½¸ º±® ¬¸» Ù®±©¬¸ ß®»¿­ò и¿­» îæ Ý«®®»²¬´§ô ͬ¿ºº ·­ ©±®µ·²¹ ±² ¼»ª»´±°·²¹ ¬¸» ®»­·¼»²¬·¿´ ¼·­¬®·½¬­ò ̸»­» ¼·­¬®·½¬­ ©·´´ ¾» ­·³·´¿® ¬± ±«® »¨·­¬·²¹ ­»¬ ±º ¦±²·²¹ ¼·­¬®·½¬­ô ³»¿²·²¹ ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸»§ ©·´´ ´¿®¹»´§ ¾» «­»ó¾¿­»¼ô ©·¬¸ ­±³» ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ °»®º±®³¿²½» ­¬¿²¼¿®¼­ò Í»ª»®¿´ ±¬¸»® »¨·­¬·²¹ ¼·­¬®·½¬­ ©·´´ ¾» ®»²¿³»¼ ¬± ­·³°´·º§ ¬¸» ²±³»²½´¿¬«®»ô ¾«¬ ¬¸» ­¬¿²¼¿®¼­ ©·´´ ®»³¿·² ¬¸» ­¿³»ò λ¬·®»¼ ¼·­¬®·½¬­ ©·´´ ®»³¿·² »ºº»½¬·ª» º±® °®±°»®¬·»­ô ¾«¬ ©·´´ ²±¬ ¾» ¿ª¿·´¿¾´» º±® º«¬«®» ®»¦±²·²¹ °®±°±­¿´­ò ̸» ¼·­¬®·½¬­ ¬± ¾» ½®»¿¬»¼ô ®»²¿³»¼ô ¿²¼ ®»¬·®»¼ ¿®» ¿­ º±´´±©­æ Ý®»¿¬»æ ÎÎî Ϋ®¿´ λ­·¼»²¬·¿´ î ¿½®»­ Û Û­¬¿¬» ÎÍ Î»­¬®·½¬»¼ Í«¾«®¾¿² ÙÍ Ù»²»®¿´ Í«¾«®¾¿² Ë Ë®¾¿² ËÑ Ë®¾¿² Ñ°»² ËÓË Ë®¾¿² Ó·¨»¼ Ë­» λ²¿³»æ ßóÑ ß¹®·½«´¬«®¿´ Ñ°»² ¬± ΠΫ®¿´ ßóÑΠΫ®¿´ λ­·¼»²¬·¿´ Í«¾¼·ª·­·±² ¬± ÎÎï Ϋ®¿´ λ­·¼»²¬·¿´ ï ¿½®» Îóí ̱©²¸±«­» ¬± Ì Ì±©²¸±«­» Îóî Ü«°´»¨ ¬± Ü Ü«°´»¨ Îóé Ó¿²«º¿½¬«®»¼ ر³» п®µ ¬± ÓØÐ Ó¿²«º¿½¬«®»¼ ر³» п®µ λ¬·®»æ ÎïóÞ Í·²¹´» Ú¿³·´§ λ­·¼»²¬·¿´ Îóï Í·²¹´» Ú¿³·´§ λ­·¼»²¬·¿´ Îóì Ó«´¬·óÚ¿³·´§ λ­·¼»²¬·¿´ Îóê Ø·¹¸ Ü»²­·¬§ Ó«´¬·óÚ¿³·´§ ß ­«¾ó½±³³·¬¬»» ±º ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ©·´´ ³»»¬ ±ª»® ¬¸» ²»¨¬ ­»ª»®¿´ ³±²¬¸­ ¬± ¼»ª»´±° ¬¸» ¿°°®±°®·¿¬» ´¿²¼ «­»­ ¿²¼ ¿­­±½·¿¬»¼ ®»¹«´¿¬·±²­ò ͬ¿µ»¸±´¼»®­ ³¿§ ¾» »²¹¿¹»¼ ¼«®·²¹ ¼·­½«­­·±² ±º ­°»½·º·½ ¬±°·½­ ±® ¯«»­¬·±²­ò 2