HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/06/2025 - Regular Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning Commission
College Station, TX
Meeting Agenda
Planning and Zoning Commission
1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, TX 77840
Internet: www.microsoft.com/microsoft-teams/join-a-meeting
Meeting ID: 242 663 945 277 | Passcode: ov9Sa9Ed
Phone: 833-240-7855 | Phone Conference ID: 960 422 366#
The City Council may or may not attend this meeting.
November 6, 2025 6:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers
College Station, TX Page 1
Notice is hereby given that a quorum of the meeting body will be present in the physical location
stated above where citizens may also attend in order to view a member(s) participating by
videoconference call as allowed by 551.127, Texas Government Code. The City uses a thirdparty
vendor to host the virtual portion of the meeting; if virtual access is unavailable, meeting access
and participation will be in-person only.
1. Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request.
2. Hear Visitors.
At this time, the Chairperson will open the floor to visitors wishing to address the Commission on issues
not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The visitor presentations will be limited to three minutes in
order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time
for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look
into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the
meeting; please give your name and address for the record.)
3. Consent Agenda
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Commission and will be
enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans and final plats, where staff has found
compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with
any and all staff recommendations. Since there will not be separate discussion of these items, citizens
wishing to address the Commission regarding one or more items on the Consent Agenda may address
the Commission at this time as well. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent
Agenda it may be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration.
3.1. Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes.
Attachments: 1. October 16 2025
4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent
Agenda by Commission action.
5. Regular Agenda.
5.1. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending
Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official
Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the
zoning district boundaries from GC General Commercial to T Townhouse for approximately
0.0175 acres generally located east of the intersection of Holleman Drive South and Cain Road.
Page 1 of 72
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 2 November 6, 2025
Case #REZ2025-000023 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the November 24,
2025 City Council Meeting – Subject to change).
Sponsors: Jeff Howell
Attachments: 1. Aerial and Small Area Map
2. Rezoning Exhibit
3. Background Information
4. Applicants Supporting Information
5. Existing Future Land Use Map
6. Rezoning Map
5.2. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending
Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 3 “Development Review Procedures”,
Section 3.5 “Concept Plans (P-MUD and PDD Districts)” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of
College Station, Texas, by amending certain sections relating to requirements, concept plans,
and community benefits for PDD Planned Development Districts. Case #ORDA2024-000004
(Note: Final action on this item will be considered at the November 24, 2025 City Council meeting
- Subject to change).
Sponsors: Jeff Howell
Attachments: 1. Section 3.5 Concept Plans (P-MUD and PDD Districts) redlines
5.3. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the FY2025 Comprehensive Plan and
Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Annual Review.
Sponsors: Ashley Klein
Attachments: 1. FY25 Comprehensive Plan & UDO Annual Review
6. Informational Agenda
6.1. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City.
New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev
6.2. Presentation and discussion regarding an update on items heard:
• A request to rezone approximately five acres of land generally located south of the
intersection of University Drive East and East Crest Drive from GC General Commercial to
MF Multi-Family. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on October 2, 2025
and voted (6-0) to recommend approval of the rezoning. The City Council heard this item
on October 9, 2025 and voted (7-0) to approve the request.
• A request to rezone approximately four acres of land generally located at the corner of
Yaupon Lane and Bradley Road from R Rural to E Estate. The Planning & Zoning
Commission heard this item on September 18, 2025 and voted (6-0) to recommend
approval of the rezoning. The City Council heard this item on October 9, 2025 and voted
(7-0) to approve the request.
6.3. Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings:
• Thursday, November 13, 2025 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting
6:00 p.m.
• Thursday, November 20, 2025 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m.
• Monday, November 24, 2025 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting
6:00 p.m.
Page 2 of 72
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 3 November 6, 2025
• Thursday, December 4, 2025 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m.
6.4. Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board and BioCorridor
Board.
• None
7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items.
A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A
statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any
deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
8. Adjourn.
The Planning and Zoning Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed
on the agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion.
I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the website and at College Station City Hall,
1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on October 29, 2025 at 5:00 p.m.
City Secretary
This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting
and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters,
readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD
at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the
meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification
at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to
provide the necessary accommodations.
Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun.
"Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly
Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411,
Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a
Handgun that is Carried Openly."
Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia.
“Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al aire
libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411,
Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad
portando arma de mano al aire libre.”
Page 3 of 72
October 16, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 8
Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission
Regular Meeting October 16, 2025
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairperson Jason Cornelius, Commissioners Aron Collins,
Tre Watson, Marcus Chaloupka, David Higdon, and Michael Buckley
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Commissioner Warren Finch CITY STAFF PRESENT: Director of Planning & Development Services Anthony Armstrong,
Assistant Director of Planning & Development Molly Hitchcock, City Engineer Carol Cotter,
Transportation Planning Coordinator Jason Schubert, Land Development Review Administrator Robin Macias, Senior Planner Jeff Howell, Staff Planner Garrett Segraves, Assistant City Attorney II Aaron Longoria, Administrative Support Specialist Kristen Hejny, Technology Services Specialist Jeremy Halling
1. Call Meeting to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request.
Chairperson Cornelius called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
2. Hear Visitors
No visitors spoke.
3. Consent Agenda 3.1 Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes.
• October 2, 2025
Commissioner Chaloupka moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Commissioner Higdon seconded the motion, the motion passed 5-0.
4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission Action. No items were removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion.
5. Regular Agenda 5.1 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts", Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from GS General Suburban to
Page 4 of 72
October 16, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 8
MH Middle Housing on approximately 0.5 acres generally located at 1612 Park Place A & B. Case #REZ2025-000020
Staff Planner Segraves presented the rezoning to the Commission recommending approval. Chairperson Cornelius asked for clarification on the appropriate uses for MH Middle
Housing and GS General Suburban zoning districts.
Staff Planner Segraves clarified that townhouse, duplex, and single-family uses are allowed within an MH Middle Housing zoning district, and single-family uses are allowed within a GS General Suburban zoning district.
Commissioner Collins asked for the current use on the properties. Staff Planner Segraves clarified that the properties are currently being used for single- family housing.
Chairperson Cornelius asked for plans on surrounding developments in the area rezoning to MH Middle Housing. Staff Planner Segraves clarified that there are no additional applications for rezoning in the
area.
Commissioner Collins asked if a MH Middle Housing zoning district is appropriate for a mixed-residential land use.
Staff Planner Segraves confirmed that a MH Middle Housing zoning district is appropriate
for a mixed-residential land use. Chairperson Cornelius asked if there was concern for the MH Middle Housing zoning district not fitting the surrounding areas and uses.
Staff Planner Segraves confirmed that the MH Middle Housing zoning district is in line with the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Collins asked for clarification that property owners within a 200-foot radius
were notified of the rezoning.
Staff Planner Segraves confirmed that property owners within a 200-foot radius were notified of the rezoning.
Glenn Jones, Applicant, J4 Engineering, was available to address the Commission
clarifying that the zoning fits the use.
Page 5 of 72
October 16, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 8
Commissioner Watson arrived at 6:07 p.m.
Commissioner Chaloupka asked for the proposal on the property’s development.
Mr. Jones clarified that there is no proposal to change the use at this time. Commissioner Collins asked if the development could meet the parking requirements.
Mr. Jones clarified that the parking requirements are currently met and will not change. Chairperson Cornelius opened the public hearing.
Clifton Groce, Kapchinski Subdivision, College Station, addressed the Commission asking
why the property is being rezoned from GS General Suburban to MH Middle Housing when the use will stay the same. Mr. Groce also asked about the development plans. Commissioner Collins asked for clarification that the MH Middle Housing zoning district
came to existence four years ago, and when this property was zoned, a MH Middle Housing
zoning district was not an option. Staff Planner Segraves confirmed the MH Middle Housing zoning district was not available at the time this property was originally zoned and further clarified that the MH
Middle Housing zoning district will allow single-family and duplex development, bringing
the development in line with the surrounding zoning. Chairperson Cornelius closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Chaloupka shared concerns about spot zoning.
Commissioner Collins clarified that the rezoning does meet the rezoning criteria and fits the Future Land Use Plan.
Commissioner Higdon asked for the height limitation on the development.
Staff Planner Segraves clarified that the development is limited to 35 feet. Commissioner Collins moved to recommend approval of the rezoning.
Commissioner Chaloupka seconded the motion. Chairperson Cornelius clarified that this rezoning would bring the property in line with the existing surrounding developments.
The motion was approved 6-0.
Page 6 of 72
October 16, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 8
5.2 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,”
Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College
Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from R Rural to PDD Planned Development District for approximately 3.60 acres at 3768 McCullough Road, generally located northeast of the intersection of Wellborn Road and McCullough Road. Case #REZ2025-000006
Senior Planner Howell presented the rezoning to the Commission recommending approval.
Commissioner Chaloupka asked if there were questions from the previous adjacent
property owners regarding this request.
Senior Planner Howell clarified that a comprehensive plan amendment was brought before the Commission and the City Council previously, and the request was approved. Mr. Howell further clarified that staff did receive inquiries about the future development of this
property and the public hearing notification process.
Commissioner Watson asked if staff has received any complaints about parking.
Senior Planner Howell stated that staff received no complaints about parking.
Commissioner Higdon asked if staff received retention pond inquiries regarding rainwater flowing across McCullough Road.
Senior Planner Howell stated no inquiries were received and that detention would
be evaluated with a site plan application.
Commissioner Collins asked why the applicant is requesting a waiver for parking.
Senior Planner Howell clarified that the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) does not
allow for parking to be provided between the building and residential uses, to make the
modification, the applicant is requesting that change.
Chairperson Cornelius asked for clarification that there would be no access from the development to McCullough Road.
Senior Planner Howell clarified that proposed access is to Wellborn Road only.
Chairperson Cornelius asked for clarification on why three additional uses, in addition to self-storage, needed to be included in the rezoning request.
Senior Planner Howell clarified that the three additional uses are to provide consistency with the adjacent planned development district.
Page 7 of 72
October 16, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 8
Glenn Jones, Applicant, J4 Engineering, was available to address the Commission.
Chairperson Cornelius opened the public hearing.
Jane Cohen, Wellborn Community, College Station, spoke in opposition of the rezoning citing concerns for the Wellborn Community Plan, drainage, landscaping, screening along the property line, lighting, historical character, architectural standards, electric lines, public
hearing notification process, and driveway flooding.
Tom Marty, Wellborn Baptist Church, College Station, clarified that this development is an extension of what has already been approved for the area, also stating that members of the Wellborn Baptist Church voted to approve the sale of this land for development.
Jane Cohen, Wellborn Community, College Station, spoke on the Wellborn Community Plan implementation. Chairperson Cornelius closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Collins clarified that all adjacent properties are being utilized as commercial developments and stated that this property is marked as commercial on the Future Land Use Plan, which is consistent.
Commissioner Watson asked for clarification on self-storage not being allowed in the
Wellborn area, as stated the Wellborn Community Plan. Senior Planner Howell clarified that the Wellborn Community Plan and the UDO both state that self-storage is not a permitted use in the Wellborn Commercial zoning district unless
it existed prior to 2011.
Commissioner Collins asked for clarification on staff’s approval of the contradictory rezoning and use.
Senior Planner Howell clarified that the adjacent planned development district was
approved with the same modifications, and this development is an extension of the existing use approval. Commissioner Higdon asked for additional clarification on why staff’s recommendation of
approval of the use circumvents the Wellborn Community Plan.
Director Armstrong clarified that the prohibition of self-storage uses was on the original Wellborn Community Plan in 2012; stating that the current 2022 adopted plan does not speak to self-storage, which is a permitted use in WC Wellborn Commercial zoning
district.
Page 8 of 72
October 16, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 8
Chairperson Cornelius asked for clarification that this rezoning is bringing this property in line with what has already been approved.
Director Armstrong further clarified that self-storage use is allowed under the WC Wellborn Commercial zoning district. Commissioner Watson asked for further clarification that the City of College Station did
not state that self-storage was not allowed in this area.
Director Armstrong confirmed that in the current Wellborn Community Plan, self-storage is not mentioned or prohibited.
Commissioner Chaloupka moved to recommend approval of the rezoning. Commissioner Watson seconded the motion, the motion was approved 6-0. 6. Informational Agenda
6.1 Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. New Development
Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev
There was no discussion.
6.2 Presentation and discussion regarding an update on items heard:
• An Ordinance Amendment amending Appendix A, Unified Development
Ordinance, Article 2, Development Review Bodies, Section 2.2, Planning and
Zoning Commission, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by removing powers and duties related to impact fees. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on September 18, 2025 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval of the ordinance amendment. The City Council heard this
item on September 25, 2025 and voted (7-0) to approve the request.
• A request for a rezoning repealing ordinances, in their entirety, Ordinance 2023-4477, Ordinance 2023-4479, Ordinance 2023-4481, Ordinance 2024-4499, Ordinance 2024-4528, Ordinance 2024-4543, Ordinance 2024-4549, Ordinance 2025-4583, Ordinance 2025-4584, and Ordinance 2025-4585, and
amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay to MH Middle Housing. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on September
18, 2025 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval of the rezoning. The City Council heard this item on September 25, 2025 and voted (7-0) to approve the request.
• A request for a rezoning repealing Ordinance No. 2022-4391 in its entirety, for
approximately 9.95 acres from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted
Page 9 of 72
October 16, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 8
Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban being 26 lots and a common area generally located within North Forest Estates. The Planning & Zoning
Commission heard this item on September 18, 2025 and voted (6-0) to
recommend approval of the rezoning. The City Council heard this item on September 25, 2025 and voted (7-0) to approve the request.
• A request for a rezoning repealing Ordinance No. 2022-4438 in its entirety, for
approximately 27.1 acres from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted
Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban being 39 lots generally located within Southwood Phase 21. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on September 18, 2025 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval of the rezoning. The City Council heard this item on September 25, 2025 and voted
(7-0) to approve the request.
• A request for a rezoning repealing Ordinance No. 2022-4466 in its entirety, for approximately 54.56 acres from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban being 103 lots generally located within Southwood Section 1, Southwood Section 2, Southwood Section 2A,
Southwood Sections 6, 7, and 9, and Southwood Section 10. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on September 18, 2025 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval of the rezoning. The City Council heard this item on September 25, 2025 and voted (7-0) to approve the request.
• A request for a rezoning repealing Ordinance No. 2022-4513 in its entirety, for approximately 21.21 acres from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban being 49 lots and a common area generally located within Cat Hollow Phase 1 Subdivision and Glenhaven Estates Phase 8 Subdivision. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this
item on September 18, 2025 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval of the rezoning. The City Council heard this item on September 25, 2025 and voted (7-0) to approve the request.
• A request for a rezoning repealing Ordinance No. 2022-4536 in its entirety, for
approximately 118.56 acres from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted
Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban being 147 lots generally located within Sweet Briar, College Hills Woodlands, and Woodland Acres subdivisions. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on September 18, 2025 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval of the rezoning.
The City Council heard this item on September 25, 2025 and voted (7-0) to
approve the request.
• A request for a rezoning repealing Ordinance No. 2022-4541 in its entirety, for approximately 32.26 acres from GS General Suburban or PDD Planned Development District and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General
Suburban or PDD Planned Development District being 130 lots and common area generally located within Woodcreek Section One Subdivision, save and except Woodcreek Drive. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on September 18, 2025 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval of the rezoning.
The City Council heard this item on September 25, 2025 and voted (7-0) to
approve the request.
Page 10 of 72
October 16, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 8 of 8
• A request for a rezoning repealing Ordinance No. 2022-4577 in its entirety, for
approximately 11.52 acres from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted
Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban being 33 lots generally located within Glenhaven Estates Phase 2 Subdivision, save and except Glenhaven Drive, Fernhaven Circle, Francis Circle, and Springhaven Circle. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on September 18, 2025 and voted (6-0)
to recommend approval of the rezoning. The City Council heard this item on
September 25, 2025 and voted (7-0) to approve the request.
There was no discussion.
6.3 Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings:
• Thursday, October 23, 2025 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~
Open Meeting 6:00 p.m.
• Thursday, November 6, 2025 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m.
• Thursday, November 13, 2025 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~
Open Meeting 6:00 p.m.
• Thursday, November 20, 2025 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m.
There was no discussion.
6.4 Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board and BioCorridor Board.
• None
There was no discussion.
7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items.
There was no discussion.
8. Adjourn
The meeting adjourned at 6:34 p.m.
Approved: Attest:
_____________________________ _________________________________ Jason Cornelius, Chairperson Kristen Hejny, Board Secretary
Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services
Page 11 of 72
November 6, 2025
Item No. 5.1.
Barracks West Phase 3
Sponsor: Jeff Howell, Senior Planner
Reviewed By CBC: N/A
Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an
ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, “Zoning Districts,”
Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by
changing the zoning district boundaries from GC General Commercial to T Townhouse for
approximately 0.0175 acres generally located east of the intersection of Holleman Drive South and
Cain Road. Case #REZ2025-000023 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the
November 24, 2025 City Council Meeting – Subject to change).
Relationship to Strategic Goals:
Diverse and Growing Economy
Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request.
Summary: This request is to rezone approximately 0.0175 acres of land generally located east of the
intersection of Holleman Drive South and Cain Road from GC General Commercial to T
Townhouse. The tract proposed to be rezoned consists of an un-platted property and a portion of
common area which was platted in October 2024 as part of Barracks West Phase 1 subdivision. The
property was recently rezoned to GC General Commercial in 2025, however this request is to provide
a correction and extend the townhouse zoning by about 7 feet to allow for consistent standards for
the proposed townhouse development. This zoning request is in effort to provide additional housing
and residential density to this area. The applicant is requesting the zoning district change to allow for
a proposed townhome development which would not be allowed on properties zoned GC General
Commercial and meet the zoning setbacks as required by the district.
REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA
1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan:
The subject tract was previously designated as Mixed Residential on the Comprehensive Plan Future
Land Use & Character Map. For the Mixed Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan provides
the following:
Areas appropriate for a mix of moderate density residential development including, townhomes,
duplexes, small multifamily buildings (3-12 units), and limited small-lot single family. These areas are
appropriate for residential infill and redevelopment that allows the original character to evolve. These
areas may serve as buffers between more intense multi-family residential or mixed-use development
and suburban residential or neighborhood conservation areas.
The intent of the Mixed Residential land use is to accommodate a walkable pattern of small lots,
small blocks, and well-connected street pattern that supports surrounding neighborhoods.
Developments in this district should prioritize a mix of housing types and scales located near
community facilities or adjacent to commercial or neighborhood centers. A portion of this
development is aligned with that vision.
The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within the Mixed Residential land use include:
Page 12 of 72
Middle Housing, Duplex, Townhouse, and limited-scale single-family zoning.
The subject tract is now designated as General Commercial on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land
Use & Character Map. For the General Commercial land use, the Comprehensive Plan provides the
following:
Areas appropriate for concentrated areas of commercial activities that cater to both nearby residents
and to the larger community or region. Generally, these areas tend to be large and located along
regionally significant roads. Due to their context, these areas tend to prioritize automobile mobility.
The intent of the General Commercial land use is to accommodate a commercial uses, concentrate
development at major intersections, and encourage shared surface parking.
The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within the General Commercial land use include:
General commercial, office, and mixed-use zoning.
The Comprehensive Plan serves as a guide to achieve the community’s vision for the future. It
anticipates and guides physical development in a manner that provides College Station with a
balance of land uses that promote economic development while retaining the quality of life. The
future land use designations are generally flexible and are not tied to a specific boundary as
compared to the zoning district. This is also more apparent as the property has not been subdivided
or there are no natural features dictating the boundary (i.e. floodplain).
The proposed rezoning request to T Townhouse is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as the
request will be providing a development with permitted uses allowed by the zoning district.
2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the
context of the surrounding area:
The subject property is near other existing townhouse uses which are located across Towers
Parkway to the east and Three Bear Drive to the south. The area to the east and south was recently
rezoned to allow for the continuation of townhouse uses as well. There is an existing single-family
attached residential development also near the subject property to the north across Cain Road. Along
Holleman Drive South to the northwest, there is an existing commercial development as well as
further to the south which includes a convenience store as well. The proposed zoning district is
appropriate in the context of the area as it would allow for infill with additional housing options to the
area.
3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district:
The size and location of the subject property is suitable for a townhouse with the additional area
proposed to be rezoned, and the site has adequate space to meet the minimal dimensional
standards as set forth in the Unified Development Ordinance.
4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district:
The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of this
development. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with site redevelopment shall be
designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design Guidelines. The subject
property is located near the intersection of Holleman Drive South and Cain Road, as well as adjacent
to Three Bears Drive. Holleman Drive South is identified as a Minor Arterial on the Thoroughfare
Page 13 of 72
Plan. The existing use is expected to generate less than 150 trips in any peak hour; therefore, a
Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was not required to be submitted with the application.
5. The marketability of the property:
The applicant states the strip of General Commercial has no independent marketability for
commercial use. It functions only as part of the townhouse project, making Townhouse zoning the
practical and marketable option.
Budget & Financial Summary: N/A
Attachments:
1. Aerial and Small Area Map
2. Rezoning Exhibit
3. Background Information
4. Applicants Supporting Information
5. Existing Future Land Use Map
6. Rezoning Map
Page 14 of 72
Page 15 of 72
Page 16 of 72
15
16
14
13 12
11
COMMON AREA B
6
7
COMMON
AREA A
AND Pr.D.E.
123
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10PUBLIC ALLEY 3HOLLEMAN DRIVE SOUTHCAIN ROAD
GUNNER TRAILTHREE BEARS DRIVE
KODIAK DRIVE3
2
3
1
39
TBPE NO. 12327
911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.
College Station, Texas 77840
www
(979) 764-3900
ENGINEER:
REZONING EXHIBIT
THE BARRACKS WEST SUBDIVISION
PHASE 3
0.0175 ACRES
EXISTING ZONING - GENERAL COMMERCIAL
PROPOSED ZONING - TOWNHOUSE
COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS
SURVEYOR:
McClure & Browne
Engineering/Surveying, Inc.
1008 Woodcreek Dr., Suite 103
College Station, TX 77845
(979) 693-3838
SCALE: 1"=30'
OCTOBER 2025
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
CM Delta Ridge LLC
PO BOX 12236
College Station, TX 77842
(936) 545-6050
LEGEND VICINITY MAP
HOLLEMAN DRIVE SOUTHGUNNER TRAILTOWERS PARKWAYBABY BEAR DRIVE
OLD IRONSIDES DRIVE
PALOMA RIDGE DRIVE
CAIN ROAD
NOT TO SCALE
EXISTING ZONING
PROPOSED ZONING
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF 0.0175 ACRE TRACT:
BEING ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING
SITUATED IN THE CRAWFORD BURNETT LEAGUE, ABSTRACT NO. 7, IN COLLEGE
STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING PART OF THE CALLED 3.252 ACRE
TRACT DESCRIBED IN THE DEED FROM MARK GOLDEN TO CM DELTA RIDGE LLC
RECORDED IN VOLUME 19345, PAGE 200 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF
BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS (O.P.R.B.C.), SAID TRACT ALSO BEING PART OF THE
CALLED 0.072 ACRE COMMON AREA B, BARRACKS WEST SUBDIVISION, PHASE 1
ACCORDING TO THE FINAL PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 19506, PAGE 128
(O.P.R.B.C.).
EXISTING ZONING:
GENERAL COMMERCIAL
PROPOSED ZONING:
TOWNHOUSE
0.0175 ACRES
NOTE:
0.002 ACRES OF THE REZONING ARE WITHIN COMMON AREA B, BARRACKS WEST
SUBDIVISION, PHASE 1.P:\25-309 Barracks West Subdivision Phase 3 - Documents\REZONING\Rezoning Exhibit.dwg, EXPage 17 of 72
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
NOTIFICATIONS
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: November 6, 2025
Advertised Council Hearing Date: November 24, 2025
The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s
Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing:
The Barracks at Rock Prairie
Property owner notices mailed: 4
Contacts in support: None at the time of this report
Contacts in opposition: None at the time of this report
Inquiry contacts: None at the time of this report
ADJACENT LAND USES
Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use
North Mixed Residential T Townhouse Vacant
South Mixed Residential T Townhouse Vacant, Three Bears Drive
(local street)
East Mixed Residential T Townhouse Vacant
West General Commercial GC General Commercial Vacant
DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Annexed: November 2002
Zoning: A-O Agricultural-Open (upon annexation 2002)
A-O Agricultural-Open renamed to R Rural (2013)
0.002 acre property
from R Rural to T Townhouse (2023)
R Rural and T Townhouse to GC General Commercial (2025)
Final Plat: Unplatted
0.002 acre property: platted as Common Area B (Barracks West Phase 1 -
recorded 10/31/2024)
Site Development: Single-family detached, Vacant
Page 18 of 72
Name of Project:BARRACKS WEST PHASE 3 REZONING FROM GC to T (0.01 acres) (REZ2025-
000023)
Address:3423 CAIN RD
Legal Description:A000701, CRAWFORD BURNETT (ICL), TRACT 43, 1.979 ACRES
Total Acreage:0.0175
Applicant::
Property Owner:CM Delta Ridge LLC
SCHULTZ ENGINEERING
List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change
necessary.
Final townhouse design and lotting revealed the need for an extra ~6 feet to properly align buildings and
setbacks. This small adjustment shifts 0.0175 acres from General Commercial into Townhouse, correcting the
zoning boundary to match the development already underway and surrounding townhouse uses.
Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not,
explain why the Plan is incorrect.
The zoning is compatible with the land use.
How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby
property and with the character of the neighborhood?
The tract is already part of an active townhouse subdivision. Extending the Townhouse zoning by 6 feet allows
consistent lot width, building placement, and utility layout, making the property fully suitable for townhouse use.
REZONING APPLICATION
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Page 1 of 2
Page 19 of 72
Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested.
The rezoning is an extension of existing zoning
Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
The rezoning is an extension of existing zoning
Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district.
At only 0.0175 acres, the strip of General Commercial has no independent marketability for commercial use. It
functions only as part of the townhouse project, making Townhouse zoning the practical and marketable option.
List any other reasons to support this zone change.
The change is a technical correction that improves clarity without increasing density or altering impacts.
Page 2 of 2
Page 20 of 72
Page 21 of 72
Page 22 of 72
November 6, 2025
Item No. 5.2.
Unified Development Ordinance Amendment - Concept Plans (P-MUD and PDD Districts)
Sponsor: Jeff Howell, Senior Planner
Reviewed By CBC: N/A
Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an
ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 3 “Development Review
Procedures”, Section 3.5 “Concept Plans (P-MUD and PDD Districts)” of the Code of Ordinances of
the City of College Station, Texas, by amending certain sections relating to requirements, concept
plans, and community benefits for PDD Planned Development Districts. Case #ORDA2024-000004
(Note: Final action on this item will be considered at the November 24, 2025 City Council meeting -
Subject to change).
Relationship to Strategic Goals:
Good Governance
Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval.
Summary: This proposed Unified Development Ordinance amendment affects all new proposed
PDD Planned Development Districts. Specifically, the amendment modifies this Section in order to:
1. Provide minimum standards that each PDD must include;
2. Include selective standards for community benefits;
3. Clarifies and differentiates requirements for larger vs. smaller sized PDD areas;
4. Provide more predictability and clarification;
5. For minor modifications, providing more detailed elements to provide.
Background: This topic was presented and discussed at a Planning and Zoning Commission for a
workshop item in June 2024. Several modifications were requested including a request to receive
additional stakeholder feedback. An in-person meeting was held in July 2024, with an additional
virtual meeting in August 2024 was held with those applicants and design professionals who have
submitted several rezoning applications to PDD Planned Development District in the past 10 years
who were invited to hear about the proposed Unified Development Ordinance amendment and
provide feedback. The meetings were primarily attended by several interested parties. Modifications
were made to the proposed standards and after working with the City Attorneys Office incorporated
them into the UDO.
Budget & Financial Summary: N/A
Attachments:
1. Section 3.5 Concept Plans (P-MUD and PDD Districts) redlines
Page 23 of 72
Sec. 3.5. Concept Plans (P-MUD and PDD Districts).
Concept Plan Review Process
Page 24 of 72
A. Applicability.
A concept plan shall accompany a P-MUD Planned Mixed-Use District or PDD Planned Development District
rezoning application to ensure the intent of the UDO is met by the proposed planned district standards.
B. Application Requirements.
A complete application for a concept plan shall be submitted to the Administrator with a P-MUD Planned
Mixed-Use District or PDD Planned Development District rezoning application as set forth in the General
Approval Procedures Section above unless otherwise specified in this Section.
C. Concept Plan Approval Process.
1. Pre-Application Conference.
Prior to submitting a concept plan, applicants are encouraged to schedule and attend an optional pre-
application conference in accordance with the Pre-Application Conference Subsection of the General
Approval Procedures Section above.
2. Review and Report by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board.
If the proposed area involves any required or voluntary parkland dedication, the concept plan must be
reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
recommendations shall be forwarded to the City Council.
3. Review and Report by the Greenways Program Manager.
If the proposed area includes a greenway dedication as shown on the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and
Greenways Master Plan, or if the applicant is proposing greenway dedication or voluntary sale, the
Page 25 of 72
concept plan must be reviewed by the Greenways Program Manager. The Greenways Program
Manager's recommendation shall be forwarded to the City Council.
4. Review and Recommendation by the Administrator.
The Administrator shall review the concept plan and recommend approval, approval with conditions,
or disapproval of the same.
5. Review and Recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the concept plan and recommend to the City Council
approval, approval with conditions, or disapproval of the same.
6. City Council Final Action.
The City Council shall review the concept plan and approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove.
D. Concept Plan Requirements.
A concept plan shall not be considered or reviewed as a complete site plan application. The concept plan for
the proposed development shall include the following:
1. 1. A general layout plan showing the location and relationship of the various land uses permitted in
the development; which is to include the following as applicable:
a. 2. Overall property boundary of the area to be included as part of the PDD Planned
Development District or P-MUD Planned Mixed-Use District;
b. General arrangement of existing and proposed streets;
c. The general location of building and parking areas;
d. A range of proposed building heights; (minimum and maximum) to be permitted;
3. A written statement addressing the drainage development of the site;
e. 4. General arrangement of existing and proposed sidewalks to show connectivity provided
to adjacent properties;
f. Proposed base zoning districts;
g. General arrangement of lots and/or blocks to be subdivided to illustrate proposed density;
h. Existing land uses on the property and on adjacent properties;
i. The general location of detention/retention ponds and other major drainage structures;
j. 5. Open spaces, parkland, conservation areas, greenways, parks, trails and other special
features of the development;
k. Location of landscape buffer to adjacent land uses, or enhanced landscape areas; and
l. Density of proposed development (residential units per acre).
2. For a PDD Planned Development District encompassing twenty (20) acres or more, the development may
be phased into areas to provide more detailed Concept Plans. If phased, the Concept Plan would not
need to include above referenced items but shall provide an overall general layout of areas to include the
proposed zoning and vehicular circulation. If development is to be phased, the Concept Plan must state
the phases which are intended to be developed in sequential order. Prior to development of each phase
as identified on the Concept Plan, a Concept Plan for each phase must meet all of the requirements
above and shall be required to be submitted for review to the Planning and Zoning Commission and
adoption by City Council. Each phase must be stated in the ordinance and provide reference to the
original Concept Plan.
3. A written statement addressing the drainage development of the site;
Page 26 of 72
4. A list of general bulk or dimensional variations sought; and
6. 5. If general bulk or dimensional variations are sought, provide a list of tangible community benefits
and/or innovative design concepts to justify the request. For City consideration, each tangible
community benefit and/or innovative design concepts must be enforceable via site plan or subdivision
plat regulations. Community benefits include items which provide an offset to the modifications being
requested. Examples include items such as, but not limited to providing a landscape buffer, multi-use
path, or fence/wall for screening where not required, or removal of permitted uses from the base zoning
district that may be incompatible with adjacent development. provide a list of community benefits
and/or innovative design concepts to justify the request ; .
7. The general location of the building and parking areas;
8. Open spaces, parkland, conservation areas, greenways, parks, trails, and other special features of the
development; and
9. Buffer areas or a statement indicating buffering proposed
E. Review Criteria.
The Administrator and Planning and Zoning Commission shall recommend approval and the City Council may
approve a concept plan if, in addition to the City Council Action-Review Criteria in Section 3.4.D.9.d, it finds
that the concept plan meets the following criteria:
1. The proposal will constitute an environment of sustained stability and will be in harmony with the
character of the surrounding area;
2. The proposal conforms with the policies, goals, and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, including
any associated plans or studies subsequently adopted by the City Council, and will be consistent with
the intent and purpose of this Section;
3. The proposal is compatible with existing or permitted uses on abutting sites and will not adversely
affect adjacent development;
4. Every dwelling unit need not front on a public street but shall have access to a public street directly or
via a court, walkway, public area, or area owned by an owners association;
5. 4. The development includes the provision of adequate public improvements, including, but not
limited to, parks, schools, and other public facilities;
6. 5. The development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
7. 6. The development will not adversely affect the safety and convenience of vehicular, bicycle, or
pedestrian circulation in the vicinity, including traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the
proposed use and other usesdevelopment reasonably anticipated in the area considering existing
zoning; and land uses in the area.
7. The development will provide a greater level of building design quality, community amenities, or
connectivity than would be required if the project were not being developed in a PDD Planned
Development District or P-MUD Planned Mixed-Use District.
F. Minimum Requirements.
Unless otherwise indicated in the approved concept Concept planPlan, the minimum requirements for each
development shall be those stated in this UDO for subdivisions and the requirements of the most restrictive
standard zoning district in which designated uses are permitted. Modification of these standards may be
considered during the approval process of the concept Concept planPlan. If modification of these standards
is granted with the concept plan, the Administrator will determine the specific minimum requirements.
Page 27 of 72
1. A PDD Planned Development District five (5) acres or more must comply with the following requirements:
a. Provide at least ten (10) percent of the property as common open space. Common open space
may include amenities such as, but not limited to, private outdoor recreation facilities, natural
areas, trails, agricultural lands, or stormwater management facilities designed as a neighborhood
amenity, all subject to approval by Administrator;
b. Exceed the minimum landscape points required in the Landscaping and Tree Protection
Subsection of Article 7, General Development Standards of this UDO by ten (10) percent or more
where required by the base zoning district; and
c. Must contain at least one (1) of the items listed in Section 3.5.F.1.c.. The listed items include
tangible community benefits which may offset the effects of modifications being requested. A
proposed PDD Planned Development District does not need to provide all of these items. Items
provided as tangible community benefits are subject to approval by the Administrator. The
Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council may require any other criteria it deems
appropriate to offset the modifications.
i. Provide at least twenty-five (25) percent of the property used to be as common open space
(inclusive of the common open space area requirements previously listed in Section 3.5.F.1.a.);
ii. Provide landscape buffer of fifteen (15) feet where not required or increased by more than
fifty (50) percent where already required in the Buffer Requirements Subsection of Article 7,
General Development Standards of this UDO;
iii. Provide a six (6) foot fence/wall where fence/wall is not required along the perimeter of the
area abutting property lines;
iv. Reduction from maximum impervious cover requirements for residential uses as indicated in
the Residential Zoning District Standards Subsection of Article 5, District Purpose Statements and
Supplemental Standards of this UDO by more than ten (10) percent;
v. Provide a minimum ten (10) feet wide multi-use path within the proposed development
connecting to one (1) or more adjacent properties; and/or
vi. Other innovative concepts not listed as determined appropriate by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council.
2. A PDD Planned Development District less than five (5) acres and not located in a Redevelopment Area must
comply with the following standards:
a. For a PDD Planned Development District between 4.00 and 4.99 acres, a minimum total of four
(4) points for tangible community benefits must be provided. A PDD Planned Development
District proposed between 3.00 and 3.99 acres must provide a minimum total of five (5) points
for tangible community benefits. A PDD Planned Development District proposed less than 3.00
acres must provide a minimum total of seven (7) points for tangible community benefits.
b. Points values for tangible community benefits.
i. Point values will be awarded for the PDD Planned Development District providing the following
community benefits, which will receive one (1) point each:
1. Increasing the required landscaping point requirements as determined in the
Landscaping and Tree Protection Subsection of Article 7, General Development
Standards of this UDO by ten (10) percent or more;
Page 28 of 72
2. Providing mechanical equipment screening where not already required for properties
zoned SC Suburban Commercial as found in the Non-Residential Architectural Standards
Subsection of Article 7, General Development Standards of this UDO;
3. Removing more intense uses from proposed base zoning that may be incompatible with
the surrounding area as determined by the Administrator;
4. Prohibiting internally lit signage when property is adjacent to a residential zoning district
or use;
5. Allowing only Low-Profile signs where Freestanding signs are allowed as determined in
the Signs Subsection of Article 7, General Development Standards of this UDO;
6. Allowing only Attached signs where only Low-Profile signs are allowed as determined in
the Signs Subsection of Article 7, General Development Standards of this UDO;
7. Exceeding the number of Non-Residential Architectural relief elements found in the
Non-Residential Architectural Standards Subsection of Article 7, General Development
Standards of this UDO by more than twenty-five (25) percent or two (2) elements
whichever is greater where required;
8. Meeting the SC Suburban Commercial Non-Residential Architectural Standards relief
element requirements where not already required as found in the Non-Residential
Architectural Standards Subsection of Article 7, General Development Standards of this
UDO;
9. Providing thirty (30) percent building transparency between zero (0) feet and eight (8)
feet on all façades facing right-of-way; and/or
10. Meeting the building material requirements as listed in the Non-Residential
Architectural Standards Subsection of Article 7, General Development Standards of this
UDO.
ii. Point values will be awarded for the following community benefit items, which will receive two
(2) points each:
1. Increasing the landscaping point requirements as determined in the Landscaping and
Tree Protection Subsection of Article 7, General Development Standards of this UDO by
twenty-five (25) percent or more;
2. Preserving existing canopy trees at least six (6) inches to eight (8) inches as found in the
Landscaping and Tree Protection Subsection of Article 7, General Development
Standards of this UDO;
3. Reducing the maximum building height as found in the Residential District Dimensional
Standards Subsection of Article 5, and/or Non-Residential District Dimensions Standards
Subsection of Article 5, District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards by ten
(10) feet when adjacent to a residential zoning district or use or limiting to one (1) story
when adjacent to a residential zoning district or use;
4. Providing Low-Density Residential Height Protection for property adjacent to a
residential zoning district or use where not required by the General Provisions
Subsection of Article 7, General Development Standards of this UDO; and/or
Page 29 of 72
5. Providing Non-Residential Architectural relief elements as found in the Non-Residential
Architectural Standards Subsection of Article 7, General Development Standards of this
UDO required on all facades (not facing or visible), regardless of building orientation at
one (1) element for every forty (40) feet.
iii. Point values will be awarded for the following community benefit items, which will receive
three (3) points each:
1. Increasing the landscaping point requirements as determined in the Landscaping and
Tree Protection Subsection of Article 7, General Development Standards of this UDO by
fifty (50) percent or more;
2. Providing parking screening from all property lines for all off-street parking spaces
where not required by the Landscaping and Tree Protection Subsection of Article 7,
General Development Standards of this UDO;
3. Providing connectivity to at least one (1) adjacent development through pedestrian
facilities (via internal sidewalks) within the property;
4. Providing a plaza area as indicated in the General Provisions Subsection of Article 7,
General Development Standards of this UDO;
5. Increasing the landscape buffer width requirements as determined in the Buffer
Requirements Subsection of Article 7, General Development Standards of this UDO by
an additional fifty (50) percent; and/or
6. Increasing the landscape buffer planting requirements as determined in the Buffer
Requirements Subsection of Article 7, General Development Standards of this UDO by
an additional fifty (50) percent.
iv. Items provided as tangible community benefits are subject to approval by the Administrator.
v. Where applicable, tangible community benefits that could be inclusive of one another cannot
be combined and do not provide additional/combined point values (e.g., ten (10) percent,
twenty-five (25) percent, and fifty (50) percent landscape points do not combine point values,
but only result in the individual highest point value of three (3) points for increasing landscaping
points by fifty (50) percent).
G. Compliance with Other Regulations.
The approval of a concept plan shall not relieve the developer from responsibility for complying with all
other applicable sections of this UDO and other codes and ordinances of the City of College Station unless
such relief is granted in the approved concept plan.
H. Owners Association Required.
An owners association will be required if other satisfactory arrangements have not been made for providing,
operating, and maintaining common facilities including streets, drives, service, and parking areas, common
open spaces, buffer areas, and common recreational areas at the time the development plan is submitted. If
an owners association is required, documentation must be submitted to the City at the time of platting to
assure compliance with the provisions of this UDO.
I. Modifications.
Any deviations from the approved concept plan shall require City Council approval except as provided in the
Minor Amendment to Concept Plan Subsection below.
J. Minor Amendment to Concept Plan.
Page 30 of 72
1. Minor additions and modifications to the approved concept planplans for areas less than twenty (20) acres
meeting the following criteria may be approved by the Administrator:
1. Minor additions to structures as determined by the Administrator;
2. Minor new accessory structures if the location does not interfere with the existing site layout (e.g.,
circulation, parking, loading, stormwater management facilities, open space, landscaping, buffering);
3. Minor additions to parking lots;
4. Clearinga. Do not change the total square footage of each building by more than the lesser of ten (10)
percent or two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet;
b. Do not substantially alter the arrangement of buildings from the original Concept Plan;
c. Do not increase the number of buildings (which are greater than one hundred twenty (120) square
feet);
d. Do not change the use of a building or change a required setback;
e. Do not increase the height of a building by more than ten (10) percent;
f. Do not substantially alter the configuration of streets, parking areas, drive aisles or lots from the
original Concept Plan;
g. Do not reduce common open space areas;
h. Do not propose the clearing or grading of areas not depicted on the concept Concept Pplan as a
conservation area, greenway, or park; and 5. Final
i. Do not change the final determination of the specific meritorious modifications such as setbacks, lot
size, dimensional standards, etc., granted generally as part of the concept Concept planPlan.; or
j. Do not conflict with other regulations established for the PDD Planned Development Districts.
2. Minor additions and modifications to the approved Concept Plan for a PDD Planned Development District
twenty (20) acres or more meeting the following criteria may be approved by the Administrator:
a. Do not change the arrangement or size of base zoning districts; or
b. Do not change of the final determination of the specific meritorious modifications such as setbacks, lot
size, dimensional standards, etc., granted generally as part of the Concept Plan.
(Ord. No. 2023-4453, Pt. 1(Exh. A), 8-10-2023)
Page 31 of 72
November 6, 2025
Item No. 5.3.
FY2025 Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance Annual Review
Sponsor: Ashley Klein, Staff Planner
Reviewed By CBC: N/A
Agenda Caption: Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the FY2025
Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Annual Review.
Relationship to Strategic Goals:
• Good Governance
• Financially Sustainable City
• Core Services and Infrastructure
• Neighborhood Integrity
• Diverse Growing Economy
• Improving Mobility
• Sustainable City
Recommendation(s): Staff recommends the acceptance of the annual review.
Summary: The FY2025 Comprehensive Plan & Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Annual
Review highlights the major Comprehensive Plan initiatives that occurred during FY2025. It covers
the Comprehensive Plan and all associated master plans, programs, and small area plans. The
review also includes amendments that were made to the UDO, which helps implement the
Comprehensive Plan’s vision.
In 2022, the City began using collaborative, project management software to track the
implementation progress of every action item in the Comprehensive Plan. City staff utilize this
software to establish project milestones, assign tasks, set due dates, and generate automated
update reminders. This software enables staff to manage projects more efficiently and supports the
City’s commitment to transparent reporting. Of the 98 action items in the Comprehensive Plan,
approximately 8% have been achieved, 74% are on track, 6% are off track, and 11% have not yet
been started.
Budget & Financial Summary: N/A
Attachments:
1. FY25 Comprehensive Plan & UDO Annual Review
Page 32 of 72
FY2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & UNIFIED
DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE ANNUAL REVIEW
Page 33 of 72
Contents
INTRODUCTION
Chapter 2: DISTINCTIVE PLACES
Chapter 3: STRONG NEIGHBOHOODS
Chapter 4: A PROSPEROUS ECONOMY
Chapter 5: ENGAGING SPACES
Chapter 6: INTEGRATED MOBILITY
Chapter 7: EXCEPTIONAL SERVICES
Chapter 8: MANAGED GROWTH
Chapter 9: COLLABORATIVE
PARTNERSHIPS
3
5
11
16
19
24
28
34
37
Page 34 of 72
The Comprehensive Plan identifies 98 action items intended to achieve the community’s vision and goals for the
future. This report compiles the status updates of each action item over the fiscal year 2025 (FY2025).
The FY2025 Comprehensive Plan & Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Annual Review covers the
Comprehensive Plan and all associated master plans, programs, and small area plans. The review also includes amendments that were made to the UDO, which helps implement the Comprehensive Plan’s vision and goals.
SUMMARY
In 2022, the City began using collaborative, project management software to track the implementation progress of every action item in the Comprehensive Plan. City staff utilize this software to establish project milestones,
assign tasks, set due dates, and generate automated update reminders. This software enables staff to manage projects more efficiently and supports the City’s commitment to transparent reporting. This report details the
current status of each action item as of September 30, 2025.
INTRODUCTION
3
Page 35 of 72
STATUSES
On track: The action item is progressing as expected.
Off track: The item is not progressing as expected; there are issues or delays.At risk: The action item is in danger of not being achieved. If the issues are resolved, the action item may still be
completed.Not started: The action item has not yet begun.
Achieved: The action item has been completed and resulted in the intended outcome.Not achieved: The action item has been completed but did not result in the intended outcome.
Canceled: Progress of the action item has been stopped and will not proceed further.
The breakdown by status for all 98 action items is listed below.
• Achieved - 8
• On Track - 73
• Off Track - 6
• At Risk - 0
• Not Started – 11
UDO AMENDMENTS
Family Definition Ordinance Amendment
• Adopted 09/11/2025.• Amended the definition of family to comply with Senate Bill 1567, which prohibits the regulation of occupancy
based on familial or relationship status.
Overlay District Removal Ordinance Amendment• Adopted 09/11/2025.
• Amended applicable sections by removing all language on ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlays and HOO
High Occupancy Overlays in compliance with Senate Bill 1567.
Conditional Use Permits and Nonconforming Uses Ordinance Amendment
• Adopted 10/24/2024. • Modified conditional use permit requirements and the expiration of conditional use permits and
nonconforming uses. Required nightclubs, bars, and taverns in NG-1 Core Northgate and NG-2 Transitional
Northgate to follow the conditional use permit process.
4
Page 36 of 72
DISTINCTIVE PLACES
GOAL: Vibrant and distinct districts, attractive neighborhoods,
revitalized gateways and corridors, and conserved natural areas,
grounded in environmental stewardship and resiliency.
CHAPTER 2
5
Page 37 of 72
6
Page 38 of 72
7
Page 39 of 72
ACTION ITEM STATUSES
2.1 On Track Review and undertake amendments to the Unified Development Ordinance’s zoning districts.
• Overlay District Removal Ordinance Amendment.
• Adopted 09/11/2025.
• Amended applicable sections by removing all language on ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlays and
HOO High Occupancy Overlays in compliance with Senate Bill 1567.
• Conditional Use Permits and Nonconforming Uses Ordinance Amendment.
• Adopted 10/24/2024.
• Modified conditional use permit requirements and the expiration of conditional use permits and nonconforming uses. Required nightclubs, bars, and taverns in NG-1 and NG-2 to follow the
conditional use permit process.
• The Planning & Development Services Department developed a policy guide and minor updates to UDO language to help residents and developers understand requirements for PDD Planned Development
Districts.
2.2 On Track Prioritize and undertake detailed plans for priority neighborhoods, districts, corridors, or redevelopment areas.
• The Greater Northgate Small Area Plan Engagement Report was presented to City Council on 7/10/2025.
During the main engagement effort, the City conducted 8 public meetings, with the largest meeting gathering 100 attendees.
2.3 On Track Creative incentives and programs to revitalize existing areas and established neighborhoods.
• The Community Development Division operated multiple housing assistance programs for income-
qualified applicants at or below 80% area median income. These programs include Down Payment Assistance, Housing Minor Repairs, Housing Rehabilitation Loans, Housing Reconstruction Loans, and
Tenant-Based Rental Assistance.
2.4 On Track Evaluate existing policies and create incentives for low impact and sustainable development.
• The Planning & Development Services Department is updating the Landscape Requirements, creating
a more user-friendly format for customers and staff, providing alternative landscaping guidelines (xeriscaping), and alleviating urban heat island effects through the protection of existing canopy trees and
new canopy tree placement.
8
Page 40 of 72
2.5 On Track Pursue feasibility of a tree preservation and/or tree planting incentive program.
• In December 2024, the Parks and Recreation Department coordinated two tree giveaways: • Texas Native Tree Giveaway (1,450 trees).
›Many of the 15-gallon and all the 3-gallon trees were donated by Trees for Houston, a non-profit
organization created to help get trees in ground in neighborhoods around Texas.
• Loblolly Pine Tree Giveaway (1,500 seedlings).
›Volunteers and 2 part-time staff from Lick Creek Park gave away 1,500 seedlings to people exiting
Christmas in the Park.
2.6 Achieved
FY2022
Create additional incentives for conservation design and evaluate the effectiveness of cluster development standards in the Unified Development Ordinance.
2.7 On Track Integrate parks, greenways, and community facilities within new neighborhoods.
• The Planning & Development Services Department formalized connectivity through the platting process. • Incorporated connectivity to Texas Independence Park in the expansion of the Midtown Reserve
subdivision, with Midtown’s preliminary plan ensuring connections to the park.
2.8 On Track Evaluate and update development standards in the Unified Development Ordinance.
• The Planning & Development Services Department started looking at minor amendments to the Shared Housing Use.
9
Page 41 of 72
2.9 Not Started Develop or refine incentives to promote high quality design.
2.10 On Track Encourage parking alternatives to support redevelopment opportunities.
2.11 On Track Continue to initiate proactive zoning map updates.
• In FY2025, Planning & Development staff implemented proactive zoning map updates in order to comply
with recent state legislation. In particular, City staff removed all ROO and HOO zoning overlays.
2.12 On Track Continue beautification programs.
• The Public Works Department participated in several beautification programs.• Relocated over fifty trees from the SH 6 and University Drive intersection over the last two years.
›These trees would have otherwise been removed for the widening project. They were moved to
various locations, including near the intersection of Texas Avenue and FM 2818 and in front of the College Station post office.
• Partnered with Keep Brazos Beautiful.
• Evaluated plantings for several medians of recently completed road projects.
›Drought tolerant native plantings are used to enhance medians while using little or no irrigation.
10
Page 42 of 72
STRONG NEIGHBORHOODS
CHAPTER 3
GOAL: Viable and attractive neighborhoods that maintain long-
term neighborhood integrity while collectively providing a
wide range of housing options and other services for a diverse
population.
11
Page 43 of 72
12
Page 44 of 72
ACTION ITEM STATUSES
3.1 Not Started Evaluate the effectiveness and refine neighborhood compatibility standards in the UDO.
3.2 Achieved
FY2024 Create a neighborhood planning toolkit.
3.3 On Track Create and promote a housing maintenance educational program.
• The Community Development Division collaborated with the Public Communications Department to
develop a series of public service announcements focused on home maintenance. The goal of this series is
to share helpful tips and timely reminders with residents on key aspects of maintaining their homes.
3.4 On Track Expand affordable housing and workforce housing.
• The Community Development Division expanded affordable and workforce housing through several projects.• Rehabilitated 3 rental units and 8 owner housing units.
• The Down Payment Assistance program added 10 housing units.
• Section 108/CDBG Rental Housing led to the rehabilitation of 50 units of low-income senior housing.
• Utilized federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships
Program (HOME) funding to advance the housing goals outlined in the 2020–2024 Consolidated Plan.
• Progressed on the development of the 2025–2029 Consolidated Plan through data analysis and
community engagement efforts.
• The Housing Plan Advisory Committee was created, appointed, met regularly and evaluated the City’s
Housing Action Plan by prioritizing its recommended actions.
• Completed the final rehabilitative efforts on the LULAC Oak Hill Apartment Complex, acquired and began rehabilitative work at 1116 Detroit to convert the property into a unit of affordable housing.
• Reworked the Down Payment Assistance Program (DAP) guidelines to restore its viability in the contemporary housing market.
• Released the 2024 Affordable Housing Request for Proposals but received none.
3.5 On Track Develop a parking strategy for neighborhoods near the university.
• City Council directed staff to evaluate the potential for implementing restricted on-street overnight parking
in areas zoned for single family housing within a mile radius of the university. In the final quarter of FY 2025, staff conducted public engagement to gather feedback from residents and community members on
a potential proposal.
13
Page 45 of 72
3.6 Achieved
FY2024
Develop and refine data monitoring processes to analyze housing trends and define a strategic set of actions to address housing affordability, diversity, and gentrification.
3.7 On Track Continue to track neighborhood change.
• Code Enforcement and the Community Development Division conducted a 5-year windshield survey to
evaluate the condition of all residential structures in the city.
• The Community Development Division tracked neighborhood character through ongoing updates to its
Rental Registered Property and Short-Term Rental lists, using 3rd party analysis and internal screenings to
develop a better understanding of neighborhood character.
3.8 Achieved
FY2024 Evaluate relevancy of neighborhood and small area plans that are beyond their planning horizon.
3.9 On Track Continue partnering with local nonprofit organizations and area partners to support affordable housing options.
• The Community Development Division partnered with local nonprofit organizations and area partners to support affordable housing options. • Participated in the Brazos Home Ownership Coalition, a group of nonprofits, governmental entities, and real-estate professionals that are committed to finding realistic pathways to homeownership for
working families.
• Participated with Elder-Aid, funding their purchase and rehabilitation of duplex units with Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnership Grant (HOME) funds.
• Used HOME funds to provide security deposit assistance for those receiving a Housing Choice Voucher (Section 8) through the Brazos Valley Council of Governments (BVCOG) and moving into a
unit in College Station.
• Non-Housing Public Service Activities totaled 1237 persons served.
• Housing Public Service Activities totaled to 658 persons served.
• Utilized TBRA Security Deposits to address homelessness.
›Tenant-based rental assistance/Rapid Rehousing: 50 Households assisted.
14
Page 46 of 72
3.10 On Track Continue outreach and educational efforts to support existing and encourage new neighborhood organizations.
• The Neighborhood Services Department operated several programs for residents to stay informed of City
activities.
• Sent a weekly Neighborhood Newsletter to registered homeowners and neighborhood associations.
• Hosted monthly Seminar Supper to highlight a topic of conversation or updates for different neighborhood stakeholders.
• Conducted the Annual Citizens University, 12- week behind the scenes program that allows citizens to
see how the City of College Station operates.
• Hosted a monthly Community Living Course, where people aged 18-24 who are sent by the Municipal
Court Judge take a class that features information on being a good neighbor, City ordinances, and more.
3.11 On Track Continue to fund the Neighborhood Grant Program.
• The Neighborhood Services Department received 2 new applications in FY2025.
3.12 Achieved
FY2022 Require neighborhood meetings for certain development applications.
3.13 On Track Maintain property maintenance enforcement efforts.
• Code Officers maintained property maintenance standards through the International Property Maintenance and Fire codes on all owner occupied/rental properties, and apartment complexes
throughout College Station. • The Fire Marshal and Code Officers worked with owners/management companies to support the quality of
life at various housing complexes.
3.14 On Track Evaluate the effectiveness of short-term rental regulations.
• Code Enforcement utilized a third-party vendor to identify properties operating without a license. • As of 05/15/2025, there were roughly 400 active licensed properties, and between 1/1/25 and 3/31/25,
68 properties were added to the list.
3.15 On Track Evaluate and refine the rental registration program.
• Code Enforcement utilized GIS analysis when identifying properties that are unregistered rentals. • As of 05/15/2025, there were roughly 9,000 registered properties. Through analysis and investigations,
250 long-term properties were added to that list.
15
Page 47 of 72
PROSPEROUS ECONOMY
CHAPTER 4
GOAL: A diversified economy with a wide variety of competitive
jobs and support for entrepreneurs that provides a tax base to
support the City’s ability to foster a high quality of life where
economic prosperity is widespread.
Unlike the other chapters of the Comprehensive Plan, the action items in chapter 4 are contained in a separate
Master Plan. The College Station Economic Development Master Plan was adopted by the City council in 2020 and guides the community’s economic development path for the next 5-10 years.
The following table contains the action items and status updates of the Economic Development Master Plan.
16
Page 48 of 72
Retail Recruitment
• Entered a real estate contract to sell the 28+ acres next to Costco in the Midtown Business Park for the
future development of a mixed-use center consisting of retail, entertainment, and public space.
• This project is currently in the feasibility period as staff negotiates public amenities.
• Maintained routine collaboration with a retail consultant regarding recruitment focus and activities.
• Attended national and local trade shows to recruit targeted retailers and developers.
Industry Recruitment
• Completed the sale of two lots in the College Station Business Center to a local animal health company, generating $3.3 million in sales proceeds.
• This local business outgrew its current facility and will construct a headquarters and manufacturing facility for diagnostics and biologicals.
• Generated continued interest in the 200-acre Midtown Business Park, pursuing negotiations on a prospective project.
• Key areas of focus include biotechnology and life sciences, healthcare and medical services, hospitality and tourism, professional and business services, and innovation and entrepreneurship.
• Developed workforce development partnerships through Blinn and Texas A&M University and strengthened partnerships with Small Business Development Center, the McFerrin Center for
Entrepreneurship, Brazos County, the City of Bryan, and the Chamber of Commerce. • With expanded staff capacity dedicated to industry-specific business retention and recruitment, College
Station’s 2025 strategy was intentional, data-driven, and collaborative, positioning the City as a competitive and attractive location for industry growth.
Business Retention & Expansion
• Hosted the quarterly Business Over Breakfast series, produced the monthly Hospitality Insider newsletter,
and collaborated with regional partners to align activities and initiatives that promote local economic
development and support local businesses.• Co-led the launch of CONNECT in partnership with the Small Business Development Center and the
McFerrin Center for Entrepreneurship. CONNECT is a collaborative initiative that brings regional agencies
together to support small businesses and entrepreneurs through coordinated services and knowledge
sharing. • Expanded Economic Development team by adding staff dedicated to Business Retention & Expansion
(BRE) in industry. • Organized and facilitated focus groups engaging 200+ local business leaders to inform the City’s
economic development strategic planning process with TIP Strategies.
17
Page 49 of 72
Christmas in College Station Campaign
• Executed the “Christmas in College Station” campaign for the 5th consecutive year to position College
Station as a premier holiday destination including an ongoing partnership with Santa’s Wonderland,
engagement with local businesses and stakeholders, and hosting signature events in entertainment
districts to attract visitors and boost the local economy.
• A partnership with the Texas Music Scene provided a memorable experience for attendees and infused
energy into the campaign while highlighting The Tap, a local music venue.
Destination Entertainment Venues
- Wolf Pen Creek Park & Northgate
• Continued to organize and promote recurring events in the Northgate District such as “Homegrown at
Northgate” vendor markets in the fall and spring, as well as “Howdy Holly Days”, the signature family-friendly Christmas market. • Pursued a music grant program to active the Patricia Street Prominade. Initiated discussions on a prospective partnership to bring improved facilities and additional events at the Wolf Pen Creek
Amphitheater site. • Pursued a Request for Proposals process for a prospective redevelopment of the City-owned surface lot in
Northgate.
Amplifying Existing Events
• The Economic Development team held the inaugural Aggieland Music Industry Summit, featuring panel
discussion with professionals from across the music industry. • Hosted the Homegrown Tailgates prior to home A&M football games, with new additions including shuttle
service to and from the stadium as well as a media partnership with Candy 95, a local radio station. • Christmas events provided an opportunity to give back, as staff partnered with Twin City Mission, the local
homeless services provider, on a blanket drive during events. • Introduced a charitable partnership with Chrissy’s Closet by encouraging attendees to donate items to
support College Station Independent School District students in need.
Marketing & Promotional Strategies
• Expanded the “Business over Breakfast” series and engaged with various stakeholder groups through various community presentations. • The ongoing update to the Economic Development Master Plan provided additional opportunities for collaboration and storytelling about business recruitment, retention and expansion activities, and
partnerships. Staff coordinated with Public Communications on a new grow.cstx.gov website.• Visit College Station repositioned its brand story, established a novel marketing campaign, updated creative content, and produced all-new print and digital collateral.
18
Page 50 of 72
ENGAGING SPACES
CHAPTER 5
GOAL: Highly desirable parks, greenways, arts and cultural
amenities that support high-quality experiences for residents and
visitors.
19
Page 51 of 72
20
Page 52 of 72
ACTION ITEM STATUSES
5.1 On Track Continue to support, promote, and operate major arts, entertainment, sporting, and cultural destinations through cumulative actions.
• The City hosted numerous events in FY25:
• Soccer, softball, and 7v7 sports tournaments with over 600 teams.
• The I Heart America Signature Event drew 7,700+ attendees for Independence Day.
• The Texas Amateur Athletic Federation, a collaboration with Bryan that brought in 7,110 athletes.
• Three Starlight Music Series concerts with over 6,000 people across the three concerts.
• The 41st MLK Keeping the Dream Alive event at the Lincoln Center.
• The BCS Marathon.
• The Christmas in the Park event, brought in over 5,000 participants in two days.
5.2 On Track Maintain and expand community-based greenway and open space preservation programs.
• The Adopt-a-Greenway program engaged community volunteers to help maintain parks and greenways. • The Parks & Recreation Department recently assumed stewardship for greenways and is currently in the process of hiring a new events coordinator.
5.3 On Track Continue to expand outreach about the parks and greenway system.
• The Parks & Recreation Department hired a marketing coordinator and updated the E-Newsletter and Recreation Connection magazine, as well as the website. • The Parks program guide was renovated to provide program information twice a year as Recreation Connection with the first edition being January 1-July 31.
5.4 On Track Support a community-wide public art program.
• Installed public art at G. Hysmith Skate Park at Brian Bachmann Community Park.
• The City collaborated with Juvenile Services and the Purple Turtle Art Studio to host the A.R.T. for Life program.
5.5 On Track Continue leisure, health, and educational programming.
• The Parks & Recreation Department offered a variety of leisure, health, and educational programming for all citizens through the Recreation Connection guide.
5.6 On Track Identify and secure public and private funds for the acquisition of parks, greenways, and facilities.
21
Page 53 of 72
• The Parks & Recreation Department received several grants from the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department.
• Recreational Trails Program Request: $287,997 Match: $71,999 Total Project Cost: $359,996 Phase two
if Independence Park, a 67-acre passive, nature-based park facility. Includes west side recreational
trails.
• Received a grant award notification in January for a matching amount of $750,000 for trails and
connectivity at Texas Independence Park.
5.7 On Track Continue inter-agency coordination and establish new public-private partnerships to provide additional amenities, funding, networking, and co-production opportunities.
• The Parks & Recreation Department coordinated several public-private partnerships.
• Solicited $15,000 worth of sponsorships for I Heart America Celebration.
• Sought sponsorships and partnerships for Games of Texas.
• Received approval for an additional staff member responsible for volunteer and community engagement and their start date was in March.
• Partnered with the City of Bryan and various other businesses and organizations to host the 2025 Games of Texas in July.
• Successfully launched the Community Sponsorship Opportunities, raising $25,000.
5.8 Not Started Evaluate, amend, and develop relevant ordinances to protect natural resources, habitats, and green-water infrastructure.
5.9 Not Started Investigate the feasibility of incorporating riparian buffer standards to preserve sensitive land along waterways.
5.10 On Track Consider new and enhanced natural resource management strategies that promote environmental sustainability and stewardship and improve quality of life.
• Parks & Recreation staff partnered with the Native Plant Society to provide volunteer opportunities once
a month for plant pulls. Programing at Lick Creek Park offers Birding 101 in partnership with the Audubon
Society.• The Parks & Recreation Department hosted a residential giveaway for over 3,000 trees of various sizes to
residents to support the Cooling College Station Plan.
22
Page 54 of 72
5.11 On Track Invest in the redevelopment of existing parks.
• In the FY25 budget, the Parks & Recreation Department received 1.25 million dollars in funding to support
the upgrade and replacement of various amenities within the parks to include playground structures,
gazebos, and other items as needed.• Completed the new playground for 2-5 year-old children in the Fun For All Playground located within
Central Park.• Installed 4 outdoor courts for pickleball, futsal, and other sports with LED lighting.
• Includes additional parking.
• Bee Creek and Central Park Tennis Courts.
• Surface rehabilitation.
• Structural rehabilitation at Bee Creek.
• Replaced chain link fences to reduce the gap between support poles and the slab.
• Removed and selectively replaced overhead lights with LED poles.
5.12 On Track Conduct community-wide parks and recreation needs assessments and pursue recommended improvements.
• Initiated an update to the Parks, Recreation, and Open Spaces Master Plan.• The Parks & Recreation Department conducted a parks conditions assessment to evaluate the entire park inventory and will be making recommendations for improvements and replacements.
5.13 Not Started Identify a land acquisition strategy and integrate additional greenspace.
5.14 On Track Create connections between key elements of the parks, recreation, greenways systems, and destinations.
• The Parks & Recreation Department worked with City’s Transportation Planning Division to update the
Active Transportation Master Plan (update to the Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan).
5.15 On Track Design and construct inclusive, accessible, and sustainable parks and greenway trails.
23
Page 55 of 72
INTEGRATED MOBILITY
CHAPTER 6
GOAL: An innovative, safe, and well-connected, multi-modal
mobility system serving all user types that is designed to support
the surrounding land uses.
24
Page 56 of 72
25
Page 57 of 72
ACTION ITEM STATUSES
6.1 On Track Implement complete street and context sensitive design.
• The creation of a new Active Transportation Master Plan is underway and will consider updating the City’s
thoroughfare cross sections to propose alternatives in street design and construction and include prioritize
mode corridors.
6.2 Achieved
FY2025 Conduct a Thoroughfare Plan audit.
• A Traffic Congestion & Mobility Analysis was completed that assessed the traffic congestion at 50 intersections around the City and identified potential modifications to relieve traffic congestion while
accommodating other modes of travel.
6.3 On Track Enhance and upgrade intersections.
• Capital Projects Department staff managed several intersection upgrade projects in 2025. In total, more
than 20 street projects with intersection upgrades are under design or construction. Many of these will continue in FY26.
6.4 On Track Continue to evaluate and implement best management practices to increase bicycle and pedestrian use.
• The Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan is currently in the update process as a new Active
Transportation Master Plan and will include a level of traffic stress assessment for the existing bicycle and pedestrian network, updates programming efforts, and new thoroughfare cross section alternatives to
provide additional methods for bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure to be implemented.
6.5 On Track Undertake streetscape improvements within gateways and image corridors.
• The third gateway sign located at the intersection of Highway 47 and Raymond Stotzer Parkway was
completed in the last quarter of FY2025.
6.6 On Track Evaluate transit funding partnerships.
• The City Council approved shared funding in the amount of $334,000 for FY2025. City Management participates in a new Urbanized Area committee that the Brazos Transit District formed for input into
operations in the urbanized area of Brazos County.
26
Page 58 of 72
6.7 Not Started Prioritize programs and improvements that will reduce vehicular demand.
6.8 On Track Maintain the various funding programs for mobility projects.
• The Planning & Development Department assisted the Bryan-College Station Metropolitan Planning
Organization (MPO) in developing and updating its 25-year Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP). It includes future TxDOT funding for projects along high priority corridors of SH 6, FM 2154 (Wellborn Road),
SH 30 (Harvey Road), SH 40 (William D. Fitch Pkwy), FM 2818 (Harvey Mitchell Pkwy), FM 2347 (George Bush Drive), and the Bush/Wellborn Interchange. Implementation of the projects in the approved City
capital improvements program, including those from the 2022 bond election, is on-going.
6.9 On Track Fund bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure and safety improvements.
• A design contract was awarded for the construction of 8 high priority sidewalk segments and 3 shared use
path segments.• The City was awarded a Transportation Alternatives grant for funding bicycle and pedestrian
improvements at the intersection of George Bush Drive and Timber Street.• A sidewalk was extended along Foster Ave between Walton Dr and Francis Dr and Gilchrist Ave and
George Bush Dr E using Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds.
6.10 Not Started Develop performance measures, collect transportation data, and monitor trends.
6.11 Not Started Evaluate Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) requirements.
6.12 Not Started Evaluate and update access management strategies.
6.13 Not Started Develop and implement a travel demand management program.
27
Page 59 of 72
EXCEPTIONAL SERVICES
CHAPTER 7
GOAL: Exceptional municipal facilities and services that meet
community needs, contribute to community character, exhibit
environmental stewardship and resiliency, support surrounding
land uses, incorporate full life-cycle costs, and are coordinated
and fiscally responsible.
28
Page 60 of 72
29
Page 61 of 72
ACTION ITEM STATUSES
7.1 On Track Prioritize utility and service improvements in existing areas.
• Foster Avenue Sidewalks.
• Safety improvements from Walton to Francis and Gilchrist to George Bush.
• Greens Prairie Extension (Phase 2) - Arrington to City Limits.
• Reconstruction of Greens Prairie to replace asphalt with concrete roadway with curb, gutter, UG storm
sewer and sidewalks.
• Arrington to City Limits.
• Stallings/University Oaks Culverts.
• Upgrade drainage at Stallings Dr. and University Oaks Blvd.
7.2 On Track Develop a comprehensive facilities plan.
• The first iteration of the facilities master plan was completed in April 2024.• An additional two phases of the Facilities Master Plan are being considered to provide a comprehensive analysis of all City facilities.
• Phase 2 would capture all other City buildings not included in Phase 1 (approximately 39 buildings).
• Phase 3 would provide a lifecycle analysis for all buildings addressed in phases 1 and 2.
7.3 On Track Continue capitalizing on opportunities to achieve multiple community objectives through coordinated infrastructure projects.
• Capital Projects staff coordinated with Public Works, Water Services, Electric, and Planning & Development Services on all capital projects as needed and appropriate.
• College Heights Utility Rehabilitation.
• McCulloch Utility Rehabilitation.
• Krenek Tap Reconstruction.
• 2818 Transmission Line Relocation.
›Relocated multiple utilities along FM2818 from FM2154 to FM60.
›University Drive to Jones Butler Dr.
• Cain/Deacon Railroad Switch.
›Designed and constructed Railroad crossing at Deacon and closing Cain Railroad crossing.
7.4 On Track Continue to build resiliency in municipal operations and services.
7.5 Achieved
FY2023 Evaluate the utilization of community paramedicine.
30
Page 62 of 72
7.6 On Track Continue to pursue recognition, credentials, and accreditations City-wide.
• The City received the Texas Comptroller’s Transparency Trailblazer award for fiscal transparency. College
Station is one of only 10 cities in Texas to be recognized in all six categories.
7.7 On Track Continue to sustain and grow emergency management preparedness.
7.8 On Track Continue using business intelligence, data analytics, and data visualization tools.
• The Information Technology Department continued to assist City departments in their desire to leverage
these tools.
• Departments can collect and analyze data from various sources, including citizen feedback, social
media, traffic data, and sensor data, to gain valuable insights to provide enhanced services.
7.9 On Track Continue to expand wi-fi to public buildings.
• The Information Technology Department ensured all new or renovated city buildings have sufficient wi-fi
services.
• All wi-fi services include a free public option and a secure employee-only internal city network.
7.10 On Track Update public service plans.
• Master Plans are in progress for Economic Development, Tourism, Parks & Recreation, Active
Transportation, Water/Wastewater.• Updated the Solid Waste Service and Rate Study, including rates and routes/schedules.
7.11 On Track Utilize municipal service cost-benefit assessments in planning utility expansion.
• In FY2025, the City completed a Solid Waste Rate Study.
7.12 Not Started Evaluate ways to reduce energy consumption.
31
Page 63 of 72
7.13 On Track Pursue and support local water conservation and reuse initiatives.
• The Water Services Department pursued and supported local water conservation and reuse initiatives in
several ways.
• Utilized reclaimed water at Veteran’s Park.
• Monitored City water usage and encouraged conservation.
7.14 On Track Continue outreach and educational programs to reduce resource consumption.
• The Solid Waste Division encouraged participation in single stream recycling through public outreach
including radio appearances, podcasts, blog posts, keeping Recollect mobile app updated, and updating and distributing the Solid Waste and Recycling Guide for 2024-2026. Assisted the Twin Oaks Landfill with
Household Hazardous Waste Collection twice a year.
7.15 On Track Continue to implement best practices in meeting or exceeding State and Federal standards for stormwater management.
• The Planning & Development Services Department progressed on yearly Stormwater Management Plan
Best Management Practices.
• Submitted the Annual Storm Water Management Plan certification in March 2025. Stormwater
Management Program meeting next 5-year’s Texas Commission on Environmental Quality General
Permit was posted in May 2025.
7.16 On Track Advance sound floodplain management practices.
• The Planning & Development Department implemented the higher flood plain management standards
identified with the Federal Emergency Management Agency National Flood Insurance Program Class 6 Rating.
32
Page 64 of 72
7.17 On Track Continue to meet or exceed State and Federal water quality standards for drinking water sources.
7.18 On Track Continue to keep wastewater collection and treatment capacities ahead of demand.
• As of 7/1/2025, wastewater collection and treatment capacity are at 68%.
• Carters Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Equipment Buildings and Fueling Station.
›Designed and constructed pre-engineered manufactured building with 6 bays adjacent to a
2-pump fuel island.
• Carters Creek Blower Building #2 Replacement.
›Replacement of the existing aeration blowers.
• Carters Creek Blower Building #3 Replacement.
›Replacement of existing aeration buildings.
• Decommissioned Carter Lake Wastewater Treatment Plant.
›Constructed low flow lift station and 2” force main from Carter Lake to Green Jay Drive.
7.19 On Track Continue coordinated electric planning along with area partners.
• Participated in electric infrastructure planning with area partners.
7.20 On Track Design high-quality public facilities that reflect the character of their surroundings.
• The Capital Improvement Projects Department worked with stakeholders and residents to develop public facilities that reflect and serve their community.
7.21 On Track Design City facilities and infrastructure to incorporate sustainable and resilient practices.
• The Capital Improvement Projects Department worked to incorporate sustainability and resilience in City
facilities and infrastructure.
• Several projects in FY2025 worked to achieve this action, including upgrades at the Arnold Road fuel
station and the future installation of generators at the Lincoln Center and the Bob & Wanda Meyer Senior Center.
7.22 Off Track Provide public safety facilities to maintain adequate service and response times.
• Total response times do not meet department benchmarks for EMS responses.
• The City broke ground for Fire Station #7, which will provide additional support for service and
response times once established.
33
Page 65 of 72
MANAGED GROWTH
CHAPTER 8
GOAL: Fiscally responsible and carefully managed development
that is aligned with growth expectations and the ability to provide
safe, timely, and efficient infrastructure and services.
34
Page 66 of 72
ACTION ITEM STATUSES
8.1 On Track Prioritize proactive infrastructure investments and programs in strategic redevelopment and infill areas.
• Completed road improvement projects in the Northeast Gateways (Lincoln Road Rehabilitation, Foster
Street Shared-Use Paths) and added new bike lanes to Nagle Street in the Northgate Redevelopment
Area.
8.2 On Track Amend the zoning map and consider regulatory incentives to encourage infill and redevelopment.
8.3 On Track Re-envision underutilized retail uses and incentivize redevelopment and/or reuse of vacant buildings and properties.
• The Economic Development & Tourism Department maintained routine collaboration with a retail
consultant regarding recruitment focus and activities. • Attended national and local trade shows to recruit targeted retailers and developers.
8.4 On Track Evaluate the utilization of impact fees that provide revenues to support infrastructure demands.
• The Planning & Development Services Department implemented the second of three residential collection rate annual increases for water and roadway impact fees January 1, 2025, as programmed. Semi-annual
reporting was presented to Impact Fee Advisory Committee and City Council in compliance with Local Government Code.
8.5 Achieved
FY2023 Evaluate and revise the Water/Sanitary Sewer Extension Policy.
8.6 On Track Conduct fiscal impact analyses.
• The Economic Development Department led several staff training courses on the model, which is currently
in the testing phase.
8.7 On Track Continue the City’s Oversize Participation practice, where appropriate.
• Residential high-rise development, Aspire II, received approval for funding of a sanitary sewer line in 2024.
The project recently completed construction and is in process of requesting reimbursement.
35
Page 67 of 72
8.8 On Track Use available tools to strategically manage growth pressure in the ETJ.
• At the 7/10/2025 City Council meeting, the City entered into a development agreement for a property on
Arrington Road, which will petition for annexation before the City approves preliminary plans.
• Throughout the fall of 2024, the City met and corresponded with elected officials and staff in the state
legislature, stating the City’s position and seeking clarification and a resolution to the constitutional conflict
created by SB 2038.
36
Page 68 of 72
COLLABORATIVE PARTNERSHIPS
CHAPTER 9
GOAL: Well-coordinated planning at all levels and effective
engagement with local jurisdictions, institutions, and
organizations to further realize the City’s vision and support the
broad community.
37
Page 69 of 72
ACTION ITEM STATUSES
9.1 On Track Reference the Comprehensive Plan actions within City master plans.
9.2 Off Track Reference the Comprehensive Plan and City master plans in Capital Improvements Planning, departmental work programs, and budgeting processes.
• Several departments reference the Comprehensive Plan to guide their annual work plans and prioritize
funding for certain Capital Improvement Projects.
9.3 Off Track Establish a university/City annual agenda.
• Quarterly meetings with the Texas A&M University president continued, but a 12-month agenda was not
created.
9.4 On Track Gather growth expectations.
• In FY2025, Planning & Development staff completed the City of College Station Existing Conditions Report, which documents trends and growth patterns in the city. Staff also developed an online dashboard
to report monthly population estimates to the public.
9.5 Off Track Formalize ongoing collaborations and establish a planning coordination task force with Texas A&M University and the City.
• A planning coordination task force was not created and is not in progress. • The City collaborated with Texas A&M on plans to redevelop Hensel Park.
9.6 On Track Continue “good neighbor” initiatives with Texas A&M for permanent and temporary residents.
• Neighborhood Services staff supported several “Good Neighbor” initiatives.
• Partnered with Code Enforcement officers to administer parking flyers in neighborhoods with
significant parking issues.
• Conducted quarterly meetings with City staff and Texas A&M Off-Campus Student Services
Department.
• Met with Texas A&M faculty, participated in the National Night Out and the Off Campus Student
Services Luncheon, and lead 3 instances of the Community Living Course.
38
Page 70 of 72
9.7 On Track Contribute to a joint branding effort with Texas A&M University.
9.8 On Track Expand tourism opportunities with Texas A&M University.
9.9 Off Track Pursue partnerships with Texas A&M University regarding environmental stewardship.
• This action item is not currently being pursued.
9.10 On Track Convene coordination meetings with neighboring jurisdictions and regional planning organizations.
• As Brazos Transit District entered an “urbanized area” (UZA) classification, a UZA governance committee was created.
• The City is a member of the committee and is seeking more effective transit options in College Station through the FY2025 and FY2026 funding agreements.
9.11 On Track Pursue interlocal cooperation agreements.
• The City and Texas A&M University entered an Interlocal Agreement for fire services on campus, in which
Texas A&M will reimburse the City for the services it provides.• Signed the Northeast Trunk Line (NETL) Phase 4 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). The MOU
states that the City of College Station’s NETL will not pass through the City of Bryan. In exchange, the City
of Bryan is giving College Station easements and right of way and $250,000 to remove a lift station on the
west side, as well as agreeing to serve areas on the west side and when they complete construction of a
new sewer plant they will utilize its capacity to serve an area currently serviced by one of the lift stations.
9.12 On Track Continue to coordinate with the College Station Independent School District and public charter schools.
• College Station Independent School District (CSISD) has members of the Recreation Center Advisory Committee and the Baseball Field Advisory Committee.• Members of the Planning & Development Services Department met with the Chief Financial Officer of CSISD to share demographic and growth data.• Engineers from the Planning & Development Services Department participate in regular coordination meetings with CSISD.
39
Page 71 of 72
9.13 On Track Continue to participate in regional mobility initiatives.
• The Planning & Development Services Department participated in several regional mobility initiatives.
These included assisting the Bryan-College Station Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) in
developing its 25-year Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), which involves future funding for several
high priority corridors in Brazos County. Staff also collaborated with Brazos County regarding the design
of Harvey Road (SH 30) corridor and TxDOT regarding SH 6, FM 2154 (Wellborn Road), Bush/Wellborn
interchange, and other safety funded projects.
40
Page 72 of 72