Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/02/2025 - Regular Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning Commission College Station, TX Meeting Agenda Planning and Zoning Commission 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, TX 77840 Internet: www.microsoft.com/microsoft-teams/join-a-meeting Meeting ID: 242 663 945 277 | Passcode: ov9Sa9Ed Phone: 833-240-7855 | Phone Conference ID: 960 422 366# The City Council may or may not attend this meeting. October 2, 2025 6:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers College Station, TX Page 1 Notice is hereby given that a quorum of the meeting body will be present in the physical location stated above where citizens may also attend in order to view a member(s) participating by videoconference call as allowed by 551.127, Texas Government Code. The City uses a thirdparty vendor to host the virtual portion of the meeting; if virtual access is unavailable, meeting access and participation will be in-person only. 1. Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request. 2. Hear Visitors At this time, the Chairperson will open the floor to visitors wishing to address the Commission on issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The visitor presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.) 3. Consent Agenda All matters listed under the Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. Since there will not be separate discussion of these items, citizens wishing to address the Commission regarding one or more items on the Consent Agenda may address the Commission at this time as well. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it may be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration. 3.1. Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes. Attachments: 1. September 18, 2025 4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. 5. Regular Agenda 5.1. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a waiver request to the Unified Development Ordinance Section 8.3.G.2.a. ‘Blocks’ and presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a Preliminary Plan for Culpepper At TAMU Subdivision on approximately 10.84 acres of land, generally located at the intersection of College Avenue and University Drive, specifically on the west side of University Drive. Case #PP2025-000008. Page 1 of 54 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 2 October 2, 2025 Sponsors: Jeff Howell Attachments: 1. Staff Report 2. Waiver Request 3. Applicants Supporting Information 4. Aerial and Small Area Map 5. Preliminary Plan 5.2. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a waiver request to the Unified Development Ordinance Section 8.4.E.1 ‘Blocks’ and Unified Development Ordinance Section 8.4.C.3.a 'Street Projection' and presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a Preliminary Plan for Bertram Grove Subdivision on approximately 50 acres of land, generally located along Royder Rd. Case #PP2025-000009. Sponsors: Gabriel Schrum Attachments: 1. Waiver Request 2. Staff Report 3. Preliminary Plan 5.3. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GC General Commercial to MF Multi-Family for approximately 4.71 acres generally located south of the intersection of University Drive East and East Crest Drive. Case #REZ2025-000022 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the October 9, 2025 City Council Meeting – Subject to change) Sponsors: Jeff Howell Attachments: 1. Aerial and Small Area Map 2. Rezoning Exhibit 3. Background Information 4. Applicant’s Supporting Information 5. Rezoning Map 6. Existing Future Land Use Map 6. Informational Agenda 6.1. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev 6.2. Presentation and discussion regarding an update on items heard: • An ordinance amendment amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 11 “Definitions”, Section 11.2 “Defined Terms” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by amending certain sections regarding the definition of family. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on September 4, 2025, and voted (4-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on September 11, 2025 and voted (7-0) to approve the request. • An ordinance amendment amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 1 “General Provisions”, Section 1.10 “Transitional Provisions,” Article 3 “Development Review Procedures”, Section 3.4 “Official Zoning Map Amendments (Rezonings),” Article 4 “Zoning Districts”, Section 4.1 “Establishment of Districts,” Article 5 “District Purpose Statements and Supplemental Standards”, Section 5.10 “Overlay Districts” and Section 5.11 “Single-Family Overlay Districts,” and Article 6 “Use Regulations”, Section 6.3 “Types of Use” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by amending Page 2 of 54 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 3 October 2, 2025 certain sections regarding the ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay zoning district and HOO High Occupancy Overlay zoning district. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on September 4, 2025, and voted (4-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on September 11, 2025 and voted (7-0) to approve the request. 6.3. Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: • Thursday, October 9, 2025 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, October 16, 2025 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, October 23, 2025 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, November 6, 2025 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m. 6.4. Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board and BioCorridor Board. • None 7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items. A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 8. Adjourn. The Planning and Zoning Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on the agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion. I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the website and at College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on September 25, 2025 at 5:00 p.m. City Secretary This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters, readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations. Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun. "Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Page 3 of 54 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 4 October 2, 2025 Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a Handgun that is Carried Openly." Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia. “Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.” Page 4 of 54 September 18, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 15 Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting September 18, 2025 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairperson Jason Cornelius, Commissioners Aron Collins, Tre Watson, Warren Finch, Marcus Chaloupka, and Michael Buckley COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Commissioner David Higdon COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmember David White CITY STAFF PRESENT: Director of Planning & Development Anthony Armstrong, Assistant Director of Planning & Development Molly Hitchcock, City Engineer Carol Cotter, Transportation Planning Coordinator Jason Schubert, Land Development Review Administrator Robin Macias, Long Range Planning Administrator Christine Leal, Principal Planner Heather Wade, Staff Planners Bekha Blasingame and Garrett Segraves, Graduate Engineer I Gillian Sitler, Deputy City Attorney Leslie Whitten, Administrative Support Specialist Kristen Hejny, Technology Services Specialist Trey Bransom 1. Call Meeting to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request. Chairperson Cornelius called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 2. Hear Visitors No visitors spoke. 3. Consent Agenda 3.1 Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes. • September 4, 2025 Commissioner Watson moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Commissioner Chaloupka seconded the motion, the motion passed 6-0. 4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission Action. No items were removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. 5. Regular Agenda 5.1 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Page 5 of 54 September 18, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 15 Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from R Rural to E Estate on approximately 4 acres generally located at the corner of Yaupon Lane and Bradley Road. Case #REZ2025-000011 Planner Segraves presented the rezoning to the Commission recommending approval. Commissioner Collins asked for clarification that an E Estate zoning district has a maximum of one dwelling unit per acre, creating a maximum of four dwelling units on this development. Planner Segraves confirmed that an E Estate zoning district has a maximum of one dwelling unit per acre, this rezoning would allow for four dwelling units. Commissioner Chaloupka asked for clarification that adjacent developments contain one dwelling unit per acre. Planner Segraves clarified that the adjacent developments are single-family homes on rural lots. Chuck Moreau, Property Owner, Carter Creek Subdivision, College Station, was available to address the Commission. Joe Schultz, Applicant, Schultz Engineering, was available to address the Commission’s questions on deed restrictions. Chairperson Cornelius opened the public hearing. No visitors spoke. Chairperson Cornelius closed the public hearing. Commissioner Collins moved to recommend approval of the rezoning. Commissioner Finch seconded the motion, the motion was approved 6-0. 5.2 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from R Rural to GS General Suburban, for approximately 237.65 acres, generally located on Greens Prairie Road, east of the intersection of Greens Prairie Road and W.S. Phillips Parkway. Case #REZ2025- 000007 Page 6 of 54 September 18, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 15 Planner Blasingame presented the rezoning to the Commission recommending approval. Commissioner Chaloupka asked if there were any transportation or infrastructure concerns regarding a potential College Station school (CSISD), and if the school owned any surrounding property. Director Armstrong clarified that CSISD does not own property in this direct vicinity, however, they do own approximately 40 acres on Arrington Road. Mr. Armstrong also clarified that the school district is notified of all rezonings to collect information for projections. Commissioner Chaloupka asked if this development would consist of entry level homes. Director Armstrong clarified that these homes are in compliance with the zoning. Commissioner Collins asked for the future land use designation for this property. Planner Blasingame confirmed that this property is designated as Suburban Residential on the Future Land Use Plan. Chairperson Cornelius asked for clarification that based on the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) of approximately 800 dwelling units, a new TIA would be required for additional dwelling units to be developed. Coordinator Schubert confirmed that development over the TIA’s assumption of 886 dwelling units would require a new TIA. The TIA assumes 886 dwelling units, and the analysis shows the additional growth will be mitigated by a required new signal at Greens Prairie Road and William D. Fitch Parkway. Chairperson Cornelius asked for the maximum number of developable dwelling units based on the current TIA. Coordinator Schubert stated that the current TIA assumes 886 established dwelling units based on roadway capacity. Commissioner Collins asked if water, wastewater, and storm sewer capacities have been addressed. Planner Blasingame stated that water, wastewater, and storm capacities support the development and proposed extensions. Commissioner Collins asked if the use is appropriate. Page 7 of 54 September 18, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 15 Planner Blasingame clarified that this zoning will allow use for residential single-family detached houses. Chairperson Cornleius asked for the desired number of dwelling units to be developed by the applicant. Adam Kurtz, Applicant, DR Horton, stated that the developer is planning to construct 886 single-family detached homes. Commissioner Watson asked for the applicant’s aimed demographic. Mr. Kurtz confirmed that the target audience is families. Chairperson Cornelius opened the public hearing. Frank Diaz-Garelli, Greens Prairie Reserve, College Station, spoke in opposition to the rezoning citing concerns for increased traffic and out of town developers. Dolores Kmiecik Graham, Greens Prairie Reserve, College Station, spoke in opposition to the rezoning citing concerns for incompatibility with surrounding areas, water and wastewater facility stress, the creation of a Municipal Utility District, high density backing up to Greens Prairie Reserve, property values, and out of town developers. Colleen Deeb, Saddle Creek, College Station, spoke in opposition to the rezoning citing concerns for property values, safety, DR Horton warranty issues, incompatibility, neighborhood integrity, legal challenges, inspection capacity, infrastructure strain, unsafe commutes, delayed emergency response, and stressed utilities. Greg Talcott, Estates of Royder Ridge, College Station, spoke in opposition to the rezoning citing concerns for traffic, crime, lower property values, and horizontal multi-family developments. Laura Lewis, Creek Meadows Subdivision, College Station, spoke in opposition to the rezoning citing concerns for the plan for the property, deed restriction violations, and homeowner complaints to the builder. Robert Todd, Woodlake Subdivision, College Station, spoke in opposition to the rezoning citing concerns for property taxes, traffic, and environmental concerns. Mr. Todd asked who would be responsible for the water supply. Director Armstrong clarified that the City of College Station is the water provider for this area. Jeff Coppernoll, Woodlake Subdivision, College Station, spoke in opposition to the rezoning citing concerns for traffic, and an inconsistency with the surrounding area. Page 8 of 54 September 18, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 15 Randy Decker, Castlegate Subdivision, College Station, asked if someone is responsible for ensuring that new developments have drainage mitigation. Engineer Sitler stated that storm sewer mitigation will be reviewed through the platting process, clarifying that there are FEMA tributaries on the tract that would require a flood study. Ms. Sitler also clarified that the developer must abide by state legislature that no increased flow to adjacent properties is allowed. Austin Pitman, Greens Prairie Reserve, College Station, asked if there are criteria that must be met to keep with the consistency of the surrounding areas. Mr. Pitman also shared concerns for traffic. Commissioner Collins asked for clarification on the number of dwelling units on an estate residential land use and a GS General Suburban zoning district. Planner Blasingame stated that the maximum number of dwelling units for E Estate is one dwelling unit per acre and a maximum of eight dwelling units per acre in a GS General Suburban zoning district. Hannah Lopez, Shenandoah Phase 15, College Station, asked if there were any plans to build an additional CSISD school in the area to meet capacities of the new development. Chairperson Cornelius clarified that CSISD zoning is outside of the Commission’s purview. Jonah Willians, Royal Oaks Gardens, Bryan, asked if there was an exception or clause that would bar the development from expanding past 886 dwelling units, and if there would be a possibility that the layout would prevent future expansion. Deputy City Attorney Whitten stated that the Commission could decide that there is a condition related to public safety, health, or general welfare, and condition could be placed on the approval of the rezoning. Planner Blasingame stated there is currently no condition on the rezoning to prevent future expansion or future growth. Director Armstrong stated that the City of College Station can require what the Comprehensive Plan shows and what properties are zoned as. The City of College Station cannot legally look at an end user. Jerry Ransom, Sweetwater Subdivision, College Station, addressed the Commission and staff asking why the applicant has chosen not to rezone to RS Restricted Suburban citing concerns with compatibility. Page 9 of 54 September 18, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 15 Planner Blasingame clarified that the applicant has applied to rezone the property to GS General Suburban. Commissioner Collins asked if an RS Restricted Suburban zoning district complies with the Future Land Use Plan. Planner Blasingame clarified that both RS Restricted Suburban and GS General Suburban zoning districts are appropriate. Commissioner Collins asked for the most appropriate zoning district to abut an estate residential land use. Director Armstrong confirmed that both RS Restricted Suburban and GS General Suburban zoning districts are allowed in this area. The adjacent estate residential land use district is in the City’s Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) and is not represented by the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Ken Welch, Woodlake Phase 1, College Station, spoke in opposition to the rezoning citing concerns for runoff, and erosion. Chairperson Cornelius closed the public hearing. Mr. Kurtz addressed the concerns from adjacent property owners, stating that at the planned 3.74 units per acre, the development is in line with the Future Land Use Plan. Commissioner Collins asked for clarification that the Commission will approve the preliminary plan for the development. Director Armstrong clarified that preliminary plans are approved at staff level if the plan is in direct compliance with the Subdivision Regulations; the Commission would only act on a preliminary plan if the plan contained discretionary items or waivers. Chairperson Cornelius asked if the TIA included the Greens Prairie Road at Arrington Road interchange. Coordinator Schubert clarified that the TIA did not include the intersection of Greens Prairie Road and Arrington Road and stated that there is a project funded to work on the intersection at William D. Fitch Parkway and Arrington Road. Chairperson Cornelius asked what other safeguards are in place to limit the number of developable homes other than the TIA. Director Armstrong clarified that there is parkland dedication, drainage design guidelines, and floodplain that must be protected, stating that this area has several creeks and large areas designated to floodplain that will limit the developable area. Page 10 of 54 September 18, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 15 Chairperson Cornelius asked for an estimate of parkland, right-of-way, and floodplain that would consume the developable area of the property. Director Armstrong clarified that around 20% to 30% of this property is comprised of parkland, future right-of-way, floodplain, and open spaces. Chairperson Cornleius asked for clarification that zoning requests do not reflect the applicant and what can be addressed with the request. Director Armstrong confirmed that this zoning is a pure land use determination. Commissioner Chaloupka asked for clarification on the two empty adjacent lots. Planner Blasingame confirmed that the square parcel on the west side of the development is the City of College Station Fire Station #7. Mr. Kurtz clarified that the adjacent empty area is not under contract with DR Horton at this time. Commissioner Chaloupka asked for clarification that adjacent property to the northwest are four homes to an acre. Planner Blasingame clarified that the Castlegate II Subdivision is zoned GS General Suburban and has 4.2 – 5 dwelling units per acre. Commissioner Chaloupka asked about the notification process for the rezoning. Planner Blasingame clarified that all property owners within a 200-foot buffer radius were notified. Director Armstrong added additional clarification on notifications that all property owners within a 200-foot buffer radius were notified as well as all HOAs in the area. Commissioner Collins asked why the applicant is requesting a GS General Suburban zoning rather than an RS Restricted Suburban zoning. Mr. Kurtz clarified that the Future Land Use Plan indicates a GS General Suburban zoning which is also consistent with the adjacent zoning. Commissioner Collins asked if zoning the property to an RS Restricted Suburban zoning district would inhibit the ability to use the property. Mr. Kurtz stated that he is unsure of the utilization of the property if zoned to an RS Restricted Suburban zoning district. Page 11 of 54 September 18, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 8 of 15 Commissioner Chaloupka asked about the parkland, right-of-way, floodplain, and open spaces, and how it affects the developments estimate of 886 dwelling units. Director Armstrong clarified that the TIA’s calculation of 886 dwelling units is based on use. Commissioner Finch asked if the Commission could recommend a larger lot size. Director Armstrong clarified that the Commission could recommend a different zoning district or a density cap with a condition based on a public safety, health, or general welfare issue. Chairperson Cornelius asked the applicant how the timeline of development would change if the Commission recommended a change in zoning or placed a condition on the zoning. Mr. Kurtz stated that he is unsure of the changes in timeline for the development if the Commission were to recommend a different zoning district or placed a condition on the zoning. Commissioner Collins commented that an RS Restricted Suburban zoning designation is a more suitable land use and would not inhibit the use of the property. Commissioner Collins moved to recommend approval of the rezoning. Commissioner Finch seconded the motion, the motion to recommend approval failed 0-6. 5.3 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2022-4391 in its entirety and amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban for approximately 9.95 acres being 26 lots and a common area within North Forest Estates, Block 1 and 2, generally located along Justin Avenue. Case #REZ2025-000013 5.4 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2023-4438 in its entirety and amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban for approximately 27.1 acres being 39 lots within Southwood Phase 21, Block 3 and 4, generally located along Bee Creek Drive and Southwood Drive. Case #REZ2025-000014 5.5 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2023-4466 in its entirety and amending Appendix A, Unified Page 12 of 54 September 18, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 9 of 15 Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban for approximately 54.56 acres being 20 lots within Southwood Section 1, Block 1 and 2, 13 lots within Southwood Section 2, Block 2, 4 lots within Southwood Section 2A, Block 3, 38 lots within Southwood Section 6,7,9 Block 3, Block 7, Block 8, and 9, 8 lots within Southwood Section 10, Block 1, and 20 lots within Camelot Section 2, Block 1 and 2, generally located between Southwest Parkway and Guadalupe Drive. Case #REZ2025-000015 5.6 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2024-4513 in its entirety and amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban for approximately 21.21 acres being 49 lots and a common area within Cat Hollow Phase 1 Subdivision and Glenhaven Estates Phase 8 Subdivision, generally located between Brazoswood Drive and Dominik Drive. Case #REZ2025- 000016 5.7 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2024-4536 in its entirety and amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban for approximately 118.56 acres being 147 lots within Sweet Briar, College Hills Woodlands, and Woodland Acres subdivisions, generally located between Lincoln Drive and Dominik Drive along Ashburn Avenue. Case #REZ2025-000017 5.8 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2024-4541 in its entirety and amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban or PDD Planned Development District and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban or PDD Planned Development District for approximately 32.26 acres being 130 lots and common area within Woodcreek Section One Subdivision, save and except Woodcreek Drive from State Highway 6 S to Lake Forest Court S. Case #REZ2025-000018 5.9 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2025-4577 in its entirety and amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GS General Suburban and ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay to GS General Suburban for approximately 11.52 acres being 33 lots within Glenhaven Page 13 of 54 September 18, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 10 of 15 Estates Phase 2 Subdivision, save and except Glenhaven Drive, Fernhaven Circle, Francis Circle, and Springhaven Circle, generally located between Brazoswood Drive and Summerglen Drive. Case #REZ2025-000019 5.10 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2023-4477 for the property described herein and amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from MH Middle Housing, R-4 Multi-Family and HOO High Occupancy Overlay to MH Middle Housing and R-4 Multi-Family for 2.85 acres being The Cooner Addition, Block 1, Lots 10-19, generally located along Cooner Street. Case #REZ2025-000012 5.11 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing in part Ordinance 2024-4542 and amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay to MH Middle Housing, provided associated conditions are met, for approximately 3.66 acres being all of that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Richard Carter league, abstract no. 8, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, including portions of Lot 5 and Lot 6 of the D.A. Smith Subdivision as described by plat recorded in volume 49, page 106 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and subsequent replats of portions of these two lots, within an area generally bounded by Lincoln Avenue, Nimitz Street, and Eisenhower Street. Case #REZ2025-000012 5.12 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance repealing, in their entirety, Ordinance 2023-4477, Ordinance 2023-4479, Ordinance 2023- 4481, Ordinance 2024-4499, Ordinance 2024-4528, Ordinance 2024-4543, Ordinance 2024-4549, Ordinance 2025-4583, Ordinance 2025-4584, and Ordinance 2025-4585, and amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay to MH Middle Housing for the following twenty-three areas: approximately 1.152 acres at 101, 103, 105, 107, 109, and 110-119 Knox Drive, being Lots 18-27, Block 29 and Lots 12-16, Block 31 of The Barracks II Subdivision Phase 401, generally located southwest of the intersection of Knox Drive and Old Wellborn Road; approximately 0.412 acres at 418, 420, 422, 424, and 426 Baby Bear Drive, being Lots 1- 5, Block 32 of The Barracks II Subdivision Phase 109, generally located northeast of the intersection of Baby Bear Drive and Towers Parkway; approximately 0.406 acres at 133, 135, 137, 139, and 141 Deacon Drive West, being Lots 1-5, Block 21 of The Barracks II Subdivision Phase 107, generally located northeast of the intersection of Deacon Drive West and General Parkway; approximately 2.01 acres being The Barracks II Phase 400 Block 36, Lots 27R & 28-40, generally located at the south corner of Tang Cake Drive and Old Wellborn Road; approximately 1.05 acres of the of the D.A. Smith Subdivision Page 14 of 54 September 18, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 11 of 15 recorded in Volume 19506, Page 169, and generally located along Avenue A; approximately 4.66 acres Little-Knight Addition, Lots 1-18, generally located on Aurora Court; approximately 23.62 acres being all of that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Joseph E. Scott league, abstract no. 50, and Crawford Burnett league, abstract no. 7, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, including all of the W.M. Sparks Subdivision as described by plat recorded in volume 139, page 261, and portions of West Park Addition and West Park 2nd Addition as described by plats recorded in volume 102, page 198 and volume 128, page 574, respectively, of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, as well as subsequent replats of portions of these subdivisions in an area generally bounded by Luther Street, Montclair Avenue, Grove Street, and Maryem Street; approximately 8.15 acres being Pecan Tree Estates Phase One Subdivision and Pecan Tree Estates Phase Two Subdivision, save and except 0.687 acres labeled "park," generally located along Oney Hervey Drive; approximately 4.6 acres being The Cooner Addition, Block 1, Lots 20-30, Block 5, Lots 1-8, generally located along Cooner Street; approximately 5.4 acres being College Vista, Block E, Lots 1-14, Block F, Lots 1-10, Block G, Lots 1-5, Block H Lots 1-3, 4R-5R, and 6-7, generally located along Live Oak Street and Ash Street; approximately 2.02 acres being Lincoln Place Phase 2, Block C, Lots 1-16 and 17R, generally located along Lincoln Avenue; approximately 5.11 acres being University Oaks Phase 2, Block 5, Lots 1-13, 14R1-14R2, 15A1-15A2, 16A1-16A2, 21- 23, 24A1-24A2, and 25R, generally located at along Dominik Drive; approximately 4.12 acres being Timber Ridge Addition Phase 1, Block 2, Lots 13-24, Block 3, Lots 12-22, generally located along University Oaks Blvd; approximately 1.10 acres being all of that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Richard Carter league, abstract no. 8, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being a portion of Lot 12 of the D.A. Smith Subdivision as described by plat recorded in volume 49, page 106 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and the northeast half (approximate) of the adjoining right-of-way of Turner Street , generally for the properties located along Gilbert Street and Turner Street; 0.23 of an acre being all of a called 0.13 acre tract recorded in Volume 13901, Page 36 OPRBCT and all of a tract of land called to be Lot 27 of Pasler Addition recorded in Volume 18475, Page 202 OPRBCT Richard Carter League Survey, Abstract, generally located along Turner Street; approximately 12.85 acres being The Barracks II Phase 111 Subdivision, and The Barracks II Phase 112, Block 38, Lots 1-24, Block 39, Lots 1-10, Common Area 13 and Parkland 12, generally bounded by Towers Parkway, Goldilocks Lane, and Cain Road; approximately 18.83 acres being Pershing Pointe Villas Phase 1 Subdivision, Volume 14370, Page 149, and Pershing Pointe Villas Phase 2A Subdivision, generally bounded by Deacon Drive W, Towers Parkway, Oak Crest, and Holleman Drive S; approximately 6.71 acres being Parkway Plaza Phase 5, Block 1, Lots 1-15, Block 2, Lots 1- 12, generally located on Pine Ridge Dr.; approximately 55.49 acres being The Barracks Phase 1 Subdivision, The Barracks Phase 2 Subdivision, Williamsgate Phase 1 Subdivision, Buena Vida Subdivision, 12 at Rock Prairie Phase 1 Subdivision, 12 at Rock Prairie Phase 2 Subdivision, and 12 at Rock Prairie Phase 3 Subdivision, generally bounded by Rock Prairie Road W, Towers Parkway, Deacon Drive W, and General Parkway; approximately 28.4 acres being University Heights Phase 1 Subdivision, save and except Common Area 4, and University Heights Phase 2 and 3 Subdivision, generally bounded by Paloma Ridge Drive, Feather Run, Davidson Drive, and Holleman Drive Page 15 of 54 September 18, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 12 of 15 South; approximately 8.8 acres being Las Palomas Subdivision, generally bounded by Abbate Road, Feather Run, Kenyon Drive, and Holleman Drive South; approximately 28.14 acres all of that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Morgan Rector league, abstract no. 46, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, including portions of the Richards Subdivision as described by plat recorded in volume 137, page 25 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and subsequent replats of portions of it, and generally being the majority of the properties which front on Richards Street, Crest Street and Sterling Street; approximately 19.34 acres being Autumn Chase, Block 1, Lots 1-7, Brentwood Section Two, Block 4, Lots 1-30, Block 5, Lots 1-23, Block 6, Lots 1-4, and Brentwood Section Three Subdivision, generally located along Cornell Dr., Brentwood Dr., and Southwest Pkwy; and approximately 5.8 acres being Ashford Square Subdivision Replat, volume 3202, page 61, generally located along Ashford Dr. Case #REZ2025- 000012 Presentation, discussion, and public hearing on agenda items #5.3 – 5.12 were held together. Principal Planner Wade presented agenda items #5.3 - #5.12 to the Commission recommending approval of all. Chairperson Cornelius opened the public hearing. Gordon Evans, Camelot Phase 4, College Station, shared concerns for the impact shared housing has on on-street parking and safety. Will McCauley, Southwood Phase 10, College Station, recommended that the staff, Commission, and City Council notify owners on occupancy restriction changes. Chairperson Cornelius asked if the City of College Station has a plan to inform citizens of the repeal. Director Armstrong clarified that HOAs can continue to enforce occupancy; there is no longer enforcement opportunity for the City of College Station. Leslie Winkey, North Forest Estates, College Station, asked if an HOA can restrict occupancy, why are there changes to the Restricted Occupancy Overlay. Chairperson Cornelius clarified that a restricted occupancy overlay was a way for the City of College Station to help with occupancy. Beth Hadden, Dobrovolny Subdivision, College Station, spoke with concerns on not having an HOA to control occupancy. Chairperson Cornelius closed the public hearing. Page 16 of 54 September 18, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 13 of 15 Commissioner Finch moved to recommend approval of agenda item #5.3. Commissioner Collins seconded the motion. Commissioner Chaloupka shared concerns for local government. The motion was approved 6-0. Commissioner Finch moved to recommend approval of agenda item #5.4. Commissioner Collins seconded the motion, the motion was approved 6-0. Commissioner Finch moved to recommend approval of agenda item #5.5. Commissioner Collins seconded the motion, the motion was approved 6-0. Commissioner Finch moved to recommend approval of agenda item #5.6. Commissioner Collins seconded the motion, the motion was approved 6-0. Commissioner Finch moved to recommend approval of agenda item #5.7. Commissioner Collins seconded the motion, the motion was approved 6-0. Commissioner Finch moved to recommend approval of the agenda item #5.8. Commissioner Collins seconded the motion, the motion was approved 6-0. Commissioner Finch moved to recommend approval of the agenda item #5.9. Commissioner Collins seconded the motion, the motion was approved 6-0. Commissioner Finch moved to recommend approval of the agenda item #5.10. Commissioner Collins seconded the motion, the motion was approved 6-0. Commissioner Finch moved to recommend approval of the agenda item #5.11. Commissioner Collins seconded the motion, the motion was approved 6-0. Commissioner Finch moved to recommend approval of the agenda item #5.12. Commissioner Collins seconded the motion, the motion was approved 6-0. 5.13 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 2, “Development Review Bodies,” Section 2.2, “Planning and Zoning Commission,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, regarding the removal of the Planning and Zoning Commission’s designation as the Impact Fee Advisory Committee. Case #ORDA2025- 000008 City Engineer Cotter presented the ordinance amendment to the Commission recommending approval. Page 17 of 54 September 18, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 14 of 15 Chairperson Cornelius asked if this ordinance amendment to was to align with state statue. City Engineer Cotter confirmed that this ordinance amendment is to align with SB1883. Chairperson Cornelius asked if there has been any additional clarification on if two Commissioners could be ad hoc members of the Committee if they choose. Director Armstrong clarified that the Commissioners could choose to do either. Chairperson Cornelius opened the public hearing. No visitors spoke. Chairperson Cornelius closed the public hearing. Commissioner Collins moved to recommend approval of the ordinance amendment. Commissioner Watson seconded the motion, the motion was approved 6-0. 5.14 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the Comprehensive Plan 5-Year Evaluation & Appraisal Report and associated appendices. Administrator Leal presented the evaluation and appraisal report to the Commission recommending approval for implementation and forwarding to the City Council. Chairperson Cornelius opened the public hearing. Kerry Roper, Pebble Creek Phase 7D, spoke in opposition to the Pebble Creek Parkway extension. Katie Roper, Castlegate Section 2, spoke in opposition to the Pebble Creek Parkway extension. Anna Lou Busboom, Pebble Creek Phase 7D, spoke in opposition to the Pebble Creek Parkway extension. Chairperson Cornelius closed the public hearing. Chairperson Cornelius asked what final effect the Comprehensive Plan and Throughfare Plan have on roadway extensions; do either have final authority. Director Armstrong confirmed that the Comprehensive Plan and Throughfare Plan are the ultimate authority. Pebble Creek Parkway already shows a street projection south and would be required to continue south per subdivision regulations. Page 18 of 54 September 18, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 15 of 15 Commissioner Chaloupka moved to recommend approval of the report to implement changes to the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Finch seconded the motion, the motion was approved 6-0. 6. Informational Agenda 6.1 Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev There was no discussion. 6.2 Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: • Thursday, September 25, 2025 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, October 2, 2025 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, October 9, 2025 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, October 16, 2025 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m. There was no discussion. 6.3 Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board and BioCorridor Board. • None There was no discussion. 7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items. Commissioner Chaloupka asked for an update on shared housing parking. Director Armstrong clarified that parking would revert to following the parking rules and regulations established prior to shared housing, restricted occupancy, and high occupancy overlays. 8. Adjourn The meeting adjourned at 8:28 p.m. Approved: Attest: __________________________________ _________________________________ Jason Cornelius, Chairperson Kristen Hejny, Board Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services Page 19 of 54 Planning & Zoning Commission October 2, 2025 Scale Three (3) lots on approximately 10.84 acres of land Location Generally located at the intersection of College Avenue and University Drive, specifically on the west side of University Drive. Applicant Kimley-Horn Project Manager Jeff Howell, Senior Planner jhowell@cstx.gov Project Overview The original preliminary plan was approved in October 2024. This revised preliminary plan includes the addition of one lot, updated phasing, and the modified location of a public way. A waiver to block length is being requested. This waiver is specifically for the public way identified as Legacy Point Drive. Two other public ways are located within the Preliminary Plan which also connect to the existing street network. This preliminary plan is for a development consisting of a mixed-use development located in the Northgate Design District. Parkland Dedication Parkland dedication fees will be paid at the time of building permit at a rate of $1,505 per bedroom for the multi-family portion. Traffic Impact Analysis An intersection analysis of Legacy Point Drive and Church Avenue was provided as part of the original preliminary plan. No mitigation was deemed necessary as a result of the proposed development. Compliant with Comprehensive Plan (including Master Plans) and Unified Development Ordinance The preliminary plan is compliant with the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map, which is classified as Urban Center. This property is also located within a Redevelopment Area. Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes, with the exception of five (5) waiver requests previously approved in 2024 and the new waiver request (1). This waiver is related to block length (Section 8.3.G.2.a.) for Legacy Point Drive between Spirit Drive and University Drive. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the waiver and the Preliminary Plan. Preliminary Plan for CULPEPPER AT TAMU PP2025-000008 Page 20 of 54 Planning & Zoning Commission October 2, 2025 Supporting Materials 1. Waiver Request 2. Applicants Supporting Information 3. Aerial and Small Area Map 4. Preliminary Plan Page 21 of 54 SUBDIVISION WAIVER REQUEST The proposed Preliminary Plan is in compliance with the applicable Subdivision Regulations contained in the UDO except for the following waiver request: UDO Section 8.3.G.2.a. ‘Blocks’ -Per the requirements of this section, block length shall not exceed 660’ for Urban Core context zones. As indicated in the waiver request, the request is for an increase in block length, which in this case extends along Legacy Point Drive. As indicated in the graphic provided, the block length on Legacy Point Drive is 885.90’ (as shown below in pink). While a similar request was previously approved for Culpepper Drive, due to the updated location of the public way, the waiver to block length is being requested again. This extends along Legacy Point Drive/Church Avenue between Spirit Drive and University Drive. The applicant states that due to the special circumstances the continuation of Culpepper Drive is not feasible due to the requirements for a public way as well as an eventual underpass between the two existing developments. It has been indicated this would also cause disruption to existing and future operations. Page 22 of 54 The applicant is requesting this waiver as their intention is to provide a new mixed-use development in the Northgate District. The applicant states that granting of the waivers will not affect the subdivision of the adjacent property as they have already been developed as well as under common ownership. The applicant is also providing the ability for future access points through the property which are encompassed within public access easements to provide future connectivity to the existing roadways. In accordance with the Subdivision Regulations, when considering a waiver the Planning and Zoning Commission should make the following findings to approve the waiver: 1) That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; The applicant is proposing a public right-of-way which is not meeting the block length requirements. The property is large, encompassing several non-platted properties under common ownership located adjacent to existing development. These properties are also located within the Northgate Design District. As part of the existing developments abutting this Preliminary Plan, three public ways (Culpepper Drive, Legacy Point Drive, and Spirit Drive) extend through the property and are uniquely configured. The other abutting roadways adjacent to the development are TXDOT roadways as well as a portion of Church Avenue. As part of this development, an existing driveway to College Avenue is proposed to be removed. Also, public access easements have been added to provide for future accessibility through the property, however these will not be formally identified as public ways. 2) That the waivers are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; If the waiver is not granted, the subject property can still be subdivided. The property is over 10 acres in size and there is no minimum lot size within the Northgate Design Districts. While the subdivision is proposed to include three lots, it may be reconfigured to still meet the requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance. However, the applicant has stated the due to the special circumstances of the adjacent development and the future development at University Drive, the development specifically on Lot 2 would be disrupted and modifications would be necessary. 3) The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering this chapter; and The granting of these waivers would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare of other properties in the area as this development will comply with all other standards and requirements found in the subdivision standards of the Unified Development Ordinance as they apply to properties located within the City of College Station. Page 23 of 54 The applicant has stated this waiver is an effort to preserve existing access to adjacent developments. A public access easement is proposed in this area, however it is not formally designated or designed as a public way. Spirit Drive is a public way proposed within the development to provide access from Legacy Point Drive to University Drive. Sidewalks and street trees are proposed within the public way. 4) That the granting of the waivers will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. This waiver will not have a negative effect on the orderly subdivision of land in the area. The public access easement encompassing the public ways are being provided to connect to existing subdivisions as well as to provide for a future connection to the adjacent TXDOT roadway. With the exception of the waivers requested, they will be meeting the requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance. If the Commission approves the waiver, the Commission shall incorporate the findings of the waiver into the official minutes of the meetings at which such waiver is granted. If the waiver is denied, then the preliminary plan is also denied. For this preliminary plan to be approved as proposed, the waiver needs to be accepted. Waivers may be granted only when in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this UDO so that public health, safety, and welfare may be secured and substantial justice done. Staff is recommending approval of the waiver request. Page 24 of 54 Page 1 of 3 PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION SUPPORTING INFORMATION Name of Project: CULPEPPER STUDENT HOUSING (PP2025-000008) Address: R13579, R13581, R13588, R13589, R13591, R13590, R13576, R38611 Applicant: Kimley-Horn Property Owner: CULPEPPER FAMILY LP Legal Description: A005001, J E SCOTT (ICL), TRACT 100.5, 4.662 ACRES, "PT OF UNIVERSITY SQUARE (GROCERY STORE SECTION)" Total Acreage: 10.84 Total No. of Lots: 3 ROW Acreage: 0 Floodplain Acreage: 0.00 Number of requested waiver(s) to subdivision regulations, if applicable: 1 Requested waiver(s) to subdivision regulations and reason for same (if applicable): Sec. 8.3. – General Requirements and Minimum Standards of Design for Subdivisions within the City Limits – G. Blocks (2.a). The developer requests a waiver to exceed the maximum allowable block length of 660 feet in an Urban Core context zone on the east side of a Public Way (Legacy Point Drive). The proposed block lengths for each curbline are shown on Waiver Exhibit 1. Regarding the waiver request, explain the following: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. If the block length requirement were to be met on the east side of Legacy Point Drive, the only place that the block length could be broken would be at the extension of Culpepper Drive by making that public access easement a public way. However, the requirement from the City would be to connect that Public Way to University Drive between the existing Taco Bell and McDonald’s properties. This is not feasible because 1) the public way would require sidewalks and street trees that would block access to the existing McDonald’s and Taco Page 25 of 54 Page 2 of 3 Bell parking lots off of that driveway where there are existing private access easements that cannot be abandoned and 2) the eventual pedestrian underpass from this property to Texas A&M under University Drive will go in this area and would prevent an extension to University Drive. 2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Without grating this waiver, the public way extension to University Drive would have to be torn up in the future to accommodate the pedestrian underpass from this property to Texas A&M under University Drive, disrupting access and operations to the proposed building on the Phase 2/Lot 2 property. Additionally, modifications to the drive would have to be made anyways to stub it north as currently proposed. 3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. No other properties in the area will be affected by this waiver. In fact, this waiver is submitted in an effort to preserve existing access for the adjacent Taco Bell and McDonald’s properties. The rest of the surrounding property is under common ownership. There are no public health, safety, or welfare considerations. 4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance. The granting of this waiver will not prevent the orderly subdivision of other land in the area, as shown on the proposed Preliminary Plan. Fee in lieu of sidewalk construction is being requested because of the following condition (if applicable): N/A Detailed explanation of condition identified above: N/A Requested Oversize Participation: Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat, if applicable: N/A Parkland Development Fee: N/A No. of acres to be dedicated: No. of acres in floodplain: N/A No. of acres in detention: N/A No. of acres in greenways: N/A Page 26 of 54 Page 3 of 3 Parks & Recreation Advisory Board approval date: N/A Page 27 of 54 FLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL FL HR HR HR HR HR HR HR HR HRHRHRHRHR BLOCK LENGTH: 885.90'COLLEGE AVENUEPUBLIC WAY - CULPEPPER DRIVEPUBLIC WAY - LEGACY POINT DRIVE PUBLIC WAY - CULPEPPER DRIVE CULPEPPER DRIVE(A 40' PUBLIC ROW)EX. PUBLIC WAY/PUBLICACCESS EASEMENTCHURCH AVENUEUNIVERSITY DRIVE BLOCK LENGTH: 224.74'PUBLIC WAY - SPIRIT DRIVE[PHASE 3]PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT [PHASE 3]PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT[PHASE 2]EXISTING PUBLICACCESS EASEMENTEXISTING PUBLICACCESS EASEMENTEXISTING PUBLICACCESS EASEMENTPROPOSED PUBLICACCESS EASEMENTPROPOSED PUBLICACCESS EASEMENTPROPOSED PUBLICACCESS EASEMENTPROPOSED PUBLICACCESS EASEMENTBY DATE AS SHOWN REVISIONSNo.DATESHEET NUMBERCHECKED BY SCALE DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY KHA PROJECT 069294106 09/03/2025 PDJ PAW PDJ © 2025 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 614 HOLLEMAN DRIVE EAST, SUITE 1100 COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 PHONE: 979-775-9595 FAX: 979-775-9599 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM FIRM NO. F-928BENCHMARKSCAUTION!!EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IN THE AREA CONTRACTORIS RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THE HORIZONTAL ANDVERTICAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY REPAIRS TOEXISTING UTILITIES DUE TO DAMAGE INCURRED DURINGCONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OFANY DISCREPANCIES ON THE PLANS.Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallCULPEPPER AT TAMU PHASE 2 PUBLIC INFRA. PLANS PREPARED FOR LV COLLECTIVE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS Bearing system is based on TexasCoordinate System of 1983, CentralZone (4203). Distances shown heronare surface distances unlessotherwise noted. To obtain griddistances divide by a combined scalefactor of 1.00009532165377BM 1 - 5/8" IR W/CAPN: 102113356.28E: 3551333.64ELEV: 334.47BM 2 - 5/8" IR W/CAPN: 10213101.83E: 35551609.20ELEV: 339.69BM 4 - 'X' CUT IN CONCRETEN: 10212323.83E: 3551567.82ELEV: 334.24BM 5 - 'X' CUT IN CONCRETEN: 10212455.71E: 3551358.95ELEV: 337.44NOR T H WAIVER EXHIBIT 1EX. 1LEGENDEXISTING PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENTPROPOSED PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENTPROPOSED PUBLIC WAYPage 28 of 54 Page 29 of 54 Page 30 of 54 HR HR HR HR HR HR HRHRHRHR NO PAR K I N G HR HR HR HR HR HR HRHRHRHR NO PAR K I N G HR HR HR HR HR HR HRHRHRHR NO PAR K I N G PHASE 1COMPLETED.SHOWN FORREFERENCE ONLY.T TCT SGSGSGAGVAGVAGVSGAGVAGVSGSGSGT TCT SGSGSGAGVAGVAGVSGAGVAGVSGSGSGT TCT SGSGSGAGVAGVAGVSGAGVAGVSGSGSGGAS GAS GAS PROP IRPROP IRPROP IRPROP IREX. SIDEWALK TOREMAIN (TYP.)EX. SIDEWALK TOREMAIN (TYP.)EX. PROPERTY LINE TO BE ADJUSTEDEX. PROPERTY LINE TO BE ADJUSTEDEX. PROPERTY LINETO BE ADJUSTEDEX. PROPERTY LINETO BE ADJUSTEDEX. SIDEWALK TO BEREMOVED (PHASE 3)EX. DRIVEWAY TO BEREMOVED (PHASE 3)EX. SIDEWALK TO BEREMOVED (PHASE 3)335340332333334336337338339 337 337337337 337 338339 335333 334 333 335335334336335 333333334 336 33 7 33 8 34034 0 337 337338338339335335335 334 336 33 6 336 337 338 3 3 6 33 6 33 7 338 33933933833833533433633733833533433633733733733 7 338340 338 339 340 337337338339 341 341 337338339 333333333334335333 334336337 337337337338339 EX. DRIVEWAY TO BEREMOVED AT THEEND OF PHASE 2CONSTRUCTIONEX. PROPERTY LINETO BE ADJUSTEDCIT Y O F C O L L E G E S T A T I O N MO N U M E N T C S 9 4 - 1 1 0 B E A R S S 63 ° 1 4 ' 1 4 " W 2 , 8 5 5 . 8 9 'REMAINDER OF LOT 1R4512/277 OPRBCT(PLATTED)TRACT "B"477/145 DRBCT(PLATTED)N/FMCDONALD'S USA, LLCCALLED 0.885 ACRE TRACT 13830/83 OPRBCT(UNPLATTED)N/FAUSTACO II REALESTATE PARTNERS,LTDCALLED 0.516 ACRETRACT 2233/93 ORBCT(UNPLATTED)LOT 1R, BLOCK 1211493/203 OPRBCT(PLATTED)NORTH RAMPARTS CONDOSN/FTHE HAMLETS CORPORATION465/605 DRBCT(PLATTED)EX 482 SQ. FT. UGELEC & COMMESMT (4661/24OPRBCT)EX 20' WIDEUTILITY ESMT(291/807DRBCT) TOBEABANDONEDEX 7.5'-10' WIDEUTILITY ESMT(335/476 DRBCT)EX 20' WIDE UGSANITARY SEWERESMT(1389/222 ORBCT) TOBE ABANDONEDEX 6,704 SQ. FT.INGRESS & EGRESSESMT(1389/231 ORBCT)EX 20' WIDEAERIAL ELEC &COMM ESMT(1396/139 ORBCT)TO BEABANDONEDEX 646 SQ. FT. UGWATER LINE ESMT(EXHIBIT 'F', 4090/242OPRBCT) TO BEABANDONEDEX 0.369 ACRE UG WATERLINE ESMT(EXHIBIT 'C', 4090/242 OPRBCT)TO BE ABANDONEDEX 0.369 ACRE UG WATERLINE ESMT(EXHIBIT 'C', 4090/242 OPRBCT)EX 30' WIDE 'NOBARRIER' AREA(726/494 ORBCT,PARTIALLYRELEASED IN1389/217 ORBCT)EX 30' WIDE 'USE INCOMMON' ESMT (319/15DRBCT)EX LICENSETO ENCROACH(1589/17ORBCT)EX 4,101 SQ. FT.PUBLIC UTILITYESMT(12294/73OPRBCT)EX 9.5' WIDE PUBLICACCESS AND LANDSCAPEESMT(12294/89 OPRBCT)EX 10' WIDEDRAINAGE,SEWER & PUBILCUTILITY ESMT(200/621 DRBCT)L6L7L8L9 L10L11L12L13L14 L17 L16C1C3C4LOT 1, BLOCK 1CULPEPPER AT TAMUSUBDIVISION 19599/63OPRBCT (PLATTED)4.931 ACRESLOT 3, BLOCK 1PHASE 34.302 ACRESL15EX 20' UTILITY ESMT(516/253 DRBCT)EX VARIABLE WIDTHPUBLIC UTILITY ESMT12294/73 OPRBCTEX 4,129 SQ. FT. UG WATER LINE ESMT(EXHIBIT 'D', 4090/242 OPRBCT)EX 780 SQ. FT. UG WATER LINE ESMT(EXHIBIT 'E', 4090/242 OPRBCT)EX 115 SQ. FT. UG WATERLINE ESMT(EXHIBIT 'G', 4090/242OPRBCT) TO BEABANDONEDEX 1,195 UG SQ. FT. WATERLINE ESMT(EXHIBIT 'B', 4090/242 OPRBCT)20' WIDE STRIP OFLAND152/237 DRBCT(OWNERSHIPUNKNOWN)EX 30' WIDEPUBLICACCESS ESMT12294/89OPRBCTEX 13.5' WIDE PUBLICACCESS ANDLANDSCAPE ESMT12294/89 OPRBCTL1EX VARIABLE WIDTHPUBLIC UTILITY ESMT12294/73 OPRBCT10-YEAR ELECTRICEASEMENT(12186/255 OPRBCT)[CURRENTLYEXPIRED]10-YEARELECTRICEASEMENT(12186/255OPRBCT)[CURRENTLYEXPIRED]10' PUE ANDPLANTING SCREENEASEMENT(152/237 DRBCT)10' RIGHT-OF-WAYACCESS EASEMENT(12999/275 OPRBCT)N/FTHE TEXAS A&MUNIVERSITY SYSTEM(1146/571 ORBCT)(PLATTED)N/FCULPEPPER FAMILY L.P.(4073/40 OPRBCT)(PLATTED)UTILITYEASEMENT(3883/301OPRBCT)L2L3L4L5LOT 2, BLOCK1PHASE 21.607 ACRESL81L82C2L83L84L85L86 L87PUBLIC WAY - CULPEPPER DRIVEPUBLIC WAY - LEGACY POINT DRIVE PUBLIC WAY - CULPEPPER DRIVE COLLEGE AVEUNIVERSITY DR CHURCH ST CROSS ST NAGLE STAS SHOWNAMENDED PRELIMINARY PLANCULPEPPER AT TAMULOTS 1, 2, & 3, BLOCK 1.10.84 ACRES(TOTAL NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS: 3)LOT 1, BLOCK 1 VOLUME-PAGE: 19599-63.& JOSEPH E. SCOTT LEAGUE SURVEY,ABSTRACT 50, COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOSCOUNTY, TEXASScaleDrawn byChecked byDateProject No.Sheet No.COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840614 HOLLEMAN DRIVE E, SUITE 1100Tel. No. (979) 775-9595Fax No. (979) 775-9599FIRM NO. F-928PDJ / JVCPDJSEP. 2025069294106CITY PROJECT NUMBER: PP2025-000008SURVEYOR:KERR SURVEYING, LLC.TBPELS FIRM #10018500SURVEY DATE: 3/19/20251718 BRIARCREST DRIVEBRYAN, TX 77802CONTACT: BRETT LAWLERPHONE: 979-268-3195PROPERTY OWNER:CULPEPPER FAMILY LP1700 GEORGE BUSH DRIVE E.COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840CONTACT: JOHN CULPEPPERPHONE: 979-696-1444NOR T H VICINITY MAPN.T.S.EXISTING PROPERTY LINEPROPOSED PROPERTY LINEADJACENT PROPERTY LINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINE TO BEADJUSTEDEXISTING EASEMENTPROPOSED PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT(PHASE 2) - SEE SHEET 2 FOR MOREDETAILSPROPOSED PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT(PHASE 3) - SEE SHEET 2 FOR MOREDETAILSPROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT -SEE SHEET 3 FOR MORE DETAILSEXISTING CURBLINES (PUBLIC ROAD)EXISTING CONTOURSEXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRICEXISTING ELECTRIC POLEEXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMAINEXISTING PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVEDLEGEND1.NUMBER OF LOTS PROPOSED: 3. LOT 1 HAS ALREADY BEEN PLATTED.2.NUMBER OF PHASES PROPOSED: 3. PHASE 1 HAS ALREADY BEEN PLATTED.3.EXISTING STRUCTURES: LOT 3: EXISTING STRUCTURES "IHOP", "SCHLOTZSKY'S", "CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL", AND THREE ACCESSORYSTRUCTURES ARE TO BE DEMOLISHED WITH PHASE 3.4.PROPOSED LAND USES: MULTIFAMILY, MIXED-USE, RETAIL.5.EXISTING ZONING: NG-26.ELECTRIC SERVICE AND STREET LIGHTING FOR THIS SUBDIVISION WILL BE PROVIDED BY COLLEGE STATION UTILITIES (CSU).7.ALL LOTS WILL MEET SETBACK AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS AS SPECIFIED IN THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION UNIFIED DEVELOPMENTORDINANCE FOR THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION IN WHICH THEY LAY.8.THE WATER SUPPLIER FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT IS COLLEGE STATION UTILITIES. THE WATERLINES WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TOTHE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS AND WILL BE LOCATED IN UTILITY EASEMENTS THROUGHOUT THE SUBJECTPROPERTY. THESE WATERLINES WILL PROVIDE THE REQUIRED FLOW TO FIRE HYDRANTS TO MEET FIRE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS.9.THIS PROPERTY FALLS WITHIN THE FLIGHT PATHS FOR TAKEOFFS AND LANDINGS OF THE EASTERWOOD AIRPORT AND MAY EXPERIENCENOISE AND POSSIBLE VIBRATION FROM AIRCRAFT.10.NO PORTION OF THIS TRACT IS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN ACCORDING TO THE F.E.M.A. FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR BRAZOSCOUNTY AND INCORPORATED AREAS, MAP NO. 48041C0305F, EFFECTIVE DATE: 04/02/2014.11.PUBLIC WAYS WILL BE MAINTAINED BY LEGACY POINT PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION.12.POA DOCUMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED WITH THE FINAL PLAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH UDO SECTION 8.3.U OWNERS ASSOCIATIONS FORFACILITIES.13.CHANGES MADE BETWEEN PP2024-000009 AND NOW INCLUDE MAKING THE EXTENSION OF CULPEPPER DRIVE PAST LEGACY POINT DRIVE ONLYA PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT, AND NOT A PUBLIC WAY, TURNING IT NORTH TO NOT CONNECT TO UNIVERSITY DRIVE, RUNNING A NEW PUBLICWAY "SPIRIT DRIVE" BETWEEN LEGACY POINT DRIVE AND UNIVERSITY DRIVE, AND UPDATING THE PROPOSED LOTS FROM 2 TO 3.14.WITHIN PHASE 1, WAIVERS REQUESTED TO BE GRANTED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WERE APPROVED ON 10/17/2024 FORBLOCK LENGTHS, STREET EXTENSIONS, AND PUBLIC WAY REQUIREMENTS.15.THREE STREET TREES SHOWN ON THE PHASE 1 PRELIMINARY PLAN AND SITE PLAN WILL NOT BE INSTALLED WITH PHASE 1 IN ORDER TOPREVENT HAVING TO REMOVE THEM DURING PHASE 3. AN AMENDED PHASE 1 SITE PLAN WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY SHOWING THISREVISION AND REPLACING OTHER TREES ALONG LEGACY POINT DRIVE WITH CANOPY TREES TO ACCOUNT FOR THE LANDSCAPE POINTDIFFERENTIAL ON PHASE 1.NOTESOHE334PRELIMINARY NOT FOR RECORD1 OF 4THE FOLLOWING NOTES ARE TAKEN FROM THE LAND TITLE SURVEY PLAT PREPARED BY KERR SURVEYING INCLUDED WITHTHIS PRELIMINARY PLAN:1.COORDINATES AND BEARING SYSTEM SHOWN ARE NAD83 (TEXAS STATE PLANE CENTRAL ZONE GRID NORTH) BASEDON THE PUBLISHED COORDINATES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION CONTROL MONUMENT CS94-110 (N:10211269.23,E:3548882.98) AND AS ESTABLISHED BY GPS OBSERVATION.2.DISTANCES SHOWN HERON ARE SURFACE DISTANCES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. TO OBTAIN GRID DISTANCES (NOTAREAS) DIVIDE BY A COMBINED SCALE FACTOR OF 1.00009532165377 (CALCULATED USING GEOID12B).3.THE SURVEY PLAT DATED 8/9/2024 WAS PREPARED TO REFLECT THE NOTHING FURTHER CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY FIRSTAMERICAN TITLE COMPANY, LLC, FILE NO. 1002-399137-RTT, DATED: 06-05-2024. THIS CERTIFICATE ONLY REFLECTS APORTION OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN. ITEMS LISTED ARE ADDRESSED AS FOLLOWS:3.1.ITEM c: (4485/142 OPRBCT) RECIPROCAL EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT DOES NOT CROSS THIS TRACT.3.2.ITEM f: (4661/24 OPRBCT) UTILITY RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT DOES CROSS THIS TRACT AS SHOWN.3.3.ALL OTHER ITEMS ARE NOT SURVEY ITEMS AND/OR ARE NOT ADDRESS BY THE PLAT.4.THE SURVEY PLAT WAS PREPARED TO REFLECT THE NOTHING FURTHER CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY FIRST AMERICANTITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, FILE NO. 1002-399137-A-RTT, DATED: 07-01-2025. THIS CERTIFICATE ONLY REFLECTS APORTION OF THE PROPRETY SHOWN. ITEMS LISTED ARE ADDRESSED AS FOLLOWS:4.1.ITEM a: (12294/73 OPRBCT) PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT DOES CROSS THIS TRACT AS SHOWN.4.2.ITEM b: (12294/89 OPRBCT) PUBLIC ACCESS AND LANDSCAPE EASEMENT DOES CROSS THIS TRACT AS SHOWN.4.3.ALL OTHER ITEMS ARE NOT SURVEY ITEMS AND/OR ARE NOT ADDRESSED BY THE PLAT.5.THE SURVEY PLAT WAS PREPARED TO REFLECT THE NOTHING FURTHER CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY FIRST AMERICANTITLE COMPANY, FILE NO. 1002-399137-A-RTT, DATED 07-01-2025. THIS CERTIFICATE ONLY REFLECTS A PORTION OF THEPROPERTY SHOWN. ITEMS LISTED ARE ADDRESSED AS FOLLOWS:5.1.ITEM a: (17612/246 OPRBCT) SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED WITH VENDOR'S LIEN DOES APPLY TO THE 0.412 ACRETRACT.5.2.ALL OTHER ITEMS ARE NOT SURVEY ITEMS AND/OR ARE NOT ADDRESSED BY THIS PLAT.6.THE SURVEY PLAT DATED 8/9/2024 WAS PREPARED TO REFLECT THE TITLE COMMITMENT ISSUED BY REPUBLIC TITLE OFTEXAS, INC., GF NO. NCS-1170483-CHI2, EFFECTIVE DATE: 03-05-2023. THIS COMMITMENT ONLY REFLECTS A PORTION OFTHE PROPERTY SHOWN. ITEMS LISTED ON SCHEDULE B ARE ADDRESSED AS FOLLOWS:6.1.ITEM 10e: (291/807 DRBCT) UTILITY EASEMENT DOES CROSS THIS TRACT AS SHOWN.6.2.ITEM 10f: (335/476 DRBCT) UTILITY EASEMENT DOES CROSS THIS TRACT AS SHOWN.6.3.ITEM 10g: (1389/222 ORBCT) SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT DOES CROSS THIS TRACT AS SHOWN.6.4.ITEM 10h: (1389/231 ORBCT) INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT DOES CROSS THIS TRACT AS SHOWN.6.5.ITEM 10i: (1396/139 ORBCT) 20' WIDE AERIAL UTILITY EASEMENT DOES CROSS THIS TRACT AS SHOWN.6.6.ITEM 10j: (4090/242 OPRBCT) WATER LINE EASEMENT DOES CROSS THIS TRACT AS SHOWN.6.7.ITEM 10l: (726/494 ORBCT) 30' SIDE "NO BARRIER" AREAS DO AFFECT THIS TRACT AS SHOWN.6.8.ITEM 10m: (319/15 DRBCT) 30' WIDE "USE IN COMMON" AREA APPLIES TO THE CURB CUT ON THE NORTHWESTSIDE OF THE MCDONALD'S TRACT AS SHOWN.6.9.ITEM 10n: (1387/323 ORBCT) POWER LINE EASEMENT DOES AFFECT THIS TRACT AS SHOWN.6.10.ITEM 10o: (1589/17 ORBCT) LICENSE TO ENCROACH DOES AFFECT THIS TRACT AS SHOWN.6.11.ITEM 10p: (1389/240 ORBCT) PARKING LICENSE AGREEMENT NO LONGER AFFECTS THIS TRACT (AREA NOW LIESWITHIN THE DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY OF CHURCH AVENUE).6.12.ITEM 10q: (12294/73 OPRBCT) PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT DOES CROSS THIS TRACT AS SHOWN.6.13.ITEM 10r: (12294/73 OPRBCT) PUBLIC ACCESS AND LANDSCAPE EASEMENT DOES CROSS THIS TRACT ASSHOWN.6.14.ALL OTHER ITEMS ARE NOT SURVEY ITEMS AND/OR ARE NOT ADDRESSED BY THIS PLAT.7.(286/543 DRBCT) MEMORANDUM OF SHOPPING CENTER LEASE BETWEEN JOHN C. CULPEPPER, SR., "LANDLORD", ANDALBERTSON'S, INC., "TENANT" PREVIOUSLY APPLIED TO A PORTION THIS TRACT AND APPEARS TO NOW BE VACANT.8.(372/410 DRBCT) MEMORANDUM OF LEASE CONTRACT BETWEEN JOHN C. CULPEPPER, JR., "LANDLORD", AND COLLEGESTATION-WEINER'S INC., "TENANT" DOES APPEAR (NOW OR FORMERLY) TO APPLY TO A PORTION OF THIS TRACT,EXHIBIT "F", BEING CALLED THE 5.13 ACRE TRACT, THE CALLED 4.963 ACRE TRACT HEREON (FORMERLY CALLED 4.96ACRE TRACT), AND TO THE CALLED 0.668 ACRE TRACT HEREON (FORMERLY CALLED 0.667 ACRE TRACT).NOTES·EX = EXISTING·IR = IRON ROD·PAE = PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT·PROP = PROPOSED·PUE = PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT·VW = VARIABLE WIDTH·TYP = TYPICALABBREVIATIONSPage 31 of 54 T TCT SGSGSGAGVAGVAGVSGAGVAGVSGSGSGSSSSDDDDDDDDDDDDDHR HR HR HR HR HR HRHRHRHR NO PAR K I N G SWSWSWSW8 3 . 4 0 ° ' 9 0 . 0 0 ° 'EX. TURN LANE(PHASE 1, BY 313COLLEGE AVENUEOWNER, LLC)PUBLIC WAY - CULPEPPER DRIVEPUBLIC WAY - CULPEPPER DRIVEPUBLIC WAY - LEGACY POINT DRIVE EX. 10' PUBLICSIDEWALK (TYP.)EX. 8' PUBLICSIDEWALK (TYP.)EX. 8' PUBLICSIDEWALK (TYP.)EX. 12' PUBLICSIDEWALK (TYP.)8.00'26.00'8.00'26.00'10.00'3 0 . 0 0 ' 12.00' 8.00'EX. 8' PUBLICSIDEWALK (TYP.)PROP 12' PUBLICSIDEWALK (TYP.)1 2 . 9 6 'EX ~12.5' PUBLICSIDEWALK (MATCHEX. SIDEWALKWIDTH)1 0 . 5 0 'EX. 10' PUBLICSIDEWALK(MATCH EX.SIDEWALK WIDTH)CONNECT TO EX. SIDEWALK7.52'EX. ~7.5' PUBLICSIDEWALKPROP. VW PAEAREA EXCLUDEDFROM EX. VW PAE43.88'43.00'PROP 12' PAE49.95'SIDEWALK TO BE BUILT WITHPHASE 1 TO BE REMOVED WITHPHASE 3PUBLIC WAY - SPIRIT DRIVE[PHASE 3]224.74'886.70 LF BLOCK LENGTHPROP. VW PAEPROP. VW PAE43.00'43.00' 43.00'PROP 8' PUBLICSIDEWALK (TYP.)PROP 8' PUBLICSIDEWALK (TYP.)PROP 8' PUBLICSIDEWALK (TYP.)8.50'26.00'8.50' 8.50'26.00'8.50'PROP 15' PUBLICSIDEWALKPUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT [PHASE 3]PUBLIC ACCESSEASEMENT[PHASE 2]885.90 LF50.00'PHASE 1 PLATTED.SHOWN FOR REFERENCEONLY.43.00'EX 482 SQ. FT. UGELEC & COMMESMT (4661/24OPRBCT)EX 20' WIDEUTILITY ESMT(291/807DRBCT) TOBEABANDONEDEX 7.5'-10' WIDEUTILITY ESMT(335/476 DRBCT)EX 20' WIDE UGSANITARY SEWERESMT(1389/222 ORBCT) TOBE ABANDONEDEX 6,704 SQ. FT.INGRESS & EGRESSESMT(1389/231 ORBCT)EX 20' WIDEAERIAL ELEC &COMM ESMT(1396/139 ORBCT)TO BEABANDONEDEX 646 SQ. FT. UGWATER LINE ESMT(EXHIBIT 'F', 4090/242OPRBCT) TO BEABANDONEDEX 0.369 ACRE UG WATERLINE ESMT(EXHIBIT 'C', 4090/242 OPRBCT)TO BE ABANDONEDEX 0.369 ACRE UG WATERLINE ESMT(EXHIBIT 'C', 4090/242 OPRBCT)EX 30' WIDE 'NOBARRIER' AREA(726/494 ORBCT,PARTIALLYRELEASED IN1389/217 ORBCT)EX 30' WIDE 'USE INCOMMON' ESMT (319/15DRBCT)EX LICENSETO ENCROACH(1589/17ORBCT)EX 4,101 SQ. FT.PUBLIC UTILITYESMT(12294/73OPRBCT)EX 9.5' WIDE PUBLICACCESS AND LANDSCAPEESMT(12294/89 OPRBCT)EX 10' WIDEDRAINAGE,SEWER & PUBILCUTILITY ESMT(200/621 DRBCT)LOT 1, BLOCK 1CULPEPPER AT TAMUSUBDIVISION 19599/63OPRBCT (PLATTED)4.931 ACRESLOT 3, BLOCK 1PHASE 34.302 ACRESEX 20' UTILITY ESMT(516/253 DRBCT)EX VARIABLE WIDTHPUBLIC UTILITY ESMT12294/73 OPRBCTEX 4,129 SQ. FT. UG WATER LINE ESMT(EXHIBIT 'D', 4090/242 OPRBCT)EX 780 SQ. FT. UG WATER LINE ESMT(EXHIBIT 'E', 4090/242 OPRBCT)EX 115 SQ. FT. UG WATERLINE ESMT(EXHIBIT 'G', 4090/242OPRBCT) TO BEABANDONEDEX 1,195 UG SQ. FT. WATERLINE ESMT(EXHIBIT 'B', 4090/242 OPRBCT)EX 30' WIDEPUBLICACCESS ESMT12294/89OPRBCTEX 13.5' WIDE PUBLICACCESS ANDLANDSCAPE ESMT12294/89 OPRBCTEX VARIABLE WIDTHPUBLIC UTILITY ESMT12294/73 OPRBCT10-YEAR ELECTRICEASEMENT(12186/255 OPRBCT)[CURRENTLYEXPIRED]10-YEARELECTRICEASEMENT(12186/255OPRBCT)[CURRENTLYEXPIRED]10' PUE ANDPLANTING SCREENEASEMENT(152/237 DRBCT)10' RIGHT-OF-WAYACCESS EASEMENT(12999/275 OPRBCT)UTILITYEASEMENT(3883/301OPRBCT)LOT 2, BLOCK1PHASE 21.607 ACRESL28C10L23L25L26C9L22L24 L21L52L44 L37 L42L38L40L3 9 L48L49L47L45L 4 6EX. VARIABLE WIDTH PAE(19599/63 OPRBCT)EX. VARIABLE WIDTH PAE(19599/63 OPRBCT)EX. VARIABLE WIDTH PAE(19599/63 OPRBCT)EX. VARIABLE WIDTH PAE(19599/63 OPRBCT)C7C8L29L30 L27L43L41EX. VARIABLE WIDTH PAE(19913/69 OPRBCT)L34 L35L36 L33L53L88C1 1 C12 C25C26L32 L50 L51L73L31L89AS SHOWNAMENDED PRELIMINARY PLANCULPEPPER AT TAMULOTS 1, 2, & 3, BLOCK 1.10.84 ACRES(TOTAL NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS: 3)LOT 1, BLOCK 1 VOLUME-PAGE: 19599-63.& JOSEPH E. SCOTT LEAGUE SURVEY,ABSTRACT 50, COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOSCOUNTY, TEXASScaleDrawn byChecked byDateProject No.Sheet No.COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840614 HOLLEMAN DRIVE E, SUITE 1100Tel. No. (979) 775-9595Fax No. (979) 775-9599FIRM NO. F-928PDJ / JVCPDJSEP. 2025069294106CITY PROJECT NUMBER: PP2025-000008SURVEYOR:KERR SURVEYING, LLC.TBPELS FIRM #10018500SURVEY DATE: 3/19/20251718 BRIARCREST DRIVEBRYAN, TX 77802CONTACT: BRETT LAWLERPHONE: 979-268-3195PROPERTY OWNER:CULPEPPER FAMILY LP1700 GEORGE BUSH DRIVE E.COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840CONTACT: JOHN CULPEPPERPHONE: 979-696-1444PROPERTY LINEPROPOSED PROPERTY LINEADJACENT PROPERTY LINEEXISTING EASEMENTPROPOSED PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT -PHASE 2PROPOSED PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT -PHASE 3EXISTING CURBLINES (PUBLIC ROAD)PROPOSED CURBLINESPROPOSED DRIVE CENTERLINEPROPOSED PUBLIC SIDEWALKEXISTING PUBLIC SIDEWALKPUBLIC SIDEWALK TO BE BUILT WITHPHASE 1 AND REMOVED WITH PHASE 3LEGEND2 OF 4PAE'S, ROAD CENTERLINES, TURN LANES, AND SIDEWALKSPRELIMINARY NOT FOR RECORDNOR TH·EX = EXISTING·IR = IRON ROD·PAE = PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT·PROP = PROPOSED·PUE = PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT·VW = VARIABLE WIDTH·TYP = TYPICALABBREVIATIONSPage 32 of 54 UGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGET T UGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGE UGE UGE UGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGECTSGSGSGAGVAGVAGVSGAGVAGVSGSGUGE SGWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SS SS SS SS SSS SSS SSDDDDDDDDDDDDDHR HR HR HR HR HR HRHRHRHR NO PAR K I N G W W W W DGAS GAS GAS GASSWWWW W W WWWWWWWWWWWSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWDDDUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEGAS GAS GAS PROP. VW PUEPROP. VW PUE26.00' 40.24' 39.50'15.00'31.00'PROP. VW PUEPHASE 1 PLATTED.SHOWN FOR REFERENCEONLY.EX 482 SQ. FT. UGELEC & COMMESMT (4661/24OPRBCT)EX 20' WIDEUTILITY ESMT(291/807DRBCT) TOBEABANDONEDEX 7.5'-10' WIDEUTILITY ESMT(335/476 DRBCT)EX 20' WIDE UGSANITARY SEWERESMT(1389/222 ORBCT) TOBE ABANDONEDEX 6,704 SQ. FT.INGRESS & EGRESSESMT(1389/231 ORBCT)EX 20' WIDEAERIAL ELEC &COMM ESMT(1396/139 ORBCT)TO BEABANDONEDEX 646 SQ. FT. UGWATER LINE ESMT(EXHIBIT 'F', 4090/242OPRBCT) TO BEABANDONEDEX 0.369 ACRE UG WATERLINE ESMT(EXHIBIT 'C', 4090/242 OPRBCT)TO BE ABANDONEDEX 0.369 ACRE UG WATERLINE ESMT(EXHIBIT 'C', 4090/242 OPRBCT)EX 30' WIDE 'NOBARRIER' AREA(726/494 ORBCT,PARTIALLYRELEASED IN1389/217 ORBCT)EX 30' WIDE 'USE INCOMMON' ESMT (319/15DRBCT)EX LICENSETO ENCROACH(1589/17ORBCT)EX 4,101 SQ. FT.PUBLIC UTILITYESMT(12294/73OPRBCT)EX 9.5' WIDE PUBLICACCESS AND LANDSCAPEESMT(12294/89 OPRBCT)EX 10' WIDEDRAINAGE,SEWER & PUBILCUTILITY ESMT(200/621 DRBCT)LOT 1, BLOCK 1CULPEPPER AT TAMUSUBDIVISION 19599/63OPRBCT (PLATTED)4.931 ACRESLOT 3, BLOCK 1PHASE 34.302 ACRESEX 20' UTILITY ESMT(516/253 DRBCT)EX VARIABLE WIDTHPUBLIC UTILITY ESMT12294/73 OPRBCTEX 4,129 SQ. FT. UG WATER LINE ESMT(EXHIBIT 'D', 4090/242 OPRBCT)EX 780 SQ. FT. UG WATER LINE ESMT(EXHIBIT 'E', 4090/242 OPRBCT)EX 115 SQ. FT. UG WATERLINE ESMT(EXHIBIT 'G', 4090/242OPRBCT) TO BEABANDONEDEX 1,195 UG SQ. FT. WATERLINE ESMT(EXHIBIT 'B', 4090/242 OPRBCT)EX 30' WIDEPUBLICACCESS ESMT12294/89OPRBCTEX 13.5' WIDE PUBLICACCESS ANDLANDSCAPE ESMT12294/89 OPRBCTEX VARIABLE WIDTHPUBLIC UTILITY ESMT12294/73 OPRBCT10-YEAR ELECTRICEASEMENT(12186/255 OPRBCT)[CURRENTLYEXPIRED]10-YEARELECTRICEASEMENT(12186/255OPRBCT)[CURRENTLYEXPIRED]10' PUE ANDPLANTING SCREENEASEMENT(152/237 DRBCT)10' RIGHT-OF-WAYACCESS EASEMENT(12999/275 OPRBCT)UTILITYEASEMENT(3883/301OPRBCT)LOT 2, BLOCK1PHASE 21.607 ACRESC18L63L68L70L71 L69EX.10'X5.5' PUE(19913/62 OPRBCT)EX.VARIABLE WIDTH PUE(19913/62 OPRBCT)EX. 10'X5.5' PUE(19913/62 OPRBCT)EX.10'X6.5' PUE(19913/62 OPRBCT)EX 12,719 SQ. FT. PUBLICUTILITY EASEMENT(19593/128 OPRBCT)EX. 3,332 SQ. FT. PUBLIC UTILITYEASEMENT (19593/128 OPRBCT) TO BEABANDONEDEX. VARIABLE WIDTH PUE(19599/63 OPRBCT)EX. VARIABLE WIDTH PUE(19599/63 OPRBCT)EX. VARIABLE WIDTH PUE(19599/63 OPRBCT)EX. VARIABLE WIDTH PUE(19599/63 OPRBCT)L62L60C24L57L61L65L64 L66 L67L59C17C15C23L56L58L54C22C20C19L5 5 C21L72C16L74L75 L76L77EX. 7.5'X21' PUE(19913/62 OPRBCT)EX. 7.5'X21' PUE(19913/62 OPRBCT)EX. 7.5'X21' PUE(19913/62 OPRBCT)EX.7.5'X15.09' PUE(19913/62 OPRBCT)L78 L 7 9 L80EX.VARIABLE WIDTH PUE(19913/62 OPRBCT)AS SHOWNAMENDED PRELIMINARY PLANCULPEPPER AT TAMULOTS 1, 2, & 3, BLOCK 1.10.84 ACRES(TOTAL NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS: 3)LOT 1, BLOCK 1 VOLUME-PAGE: 19599-63.& JOSEPH E. SCOTT LEAGUE SURVEY,ABSTRACT 50, COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOSCOUNTY, TEXASScaleDrawn byChecked byDateProject No.Sheet No.COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840614 HOLLEMAN DRIVE E, SUITE 1100Tel. No. (979) 775-9595Fax No. (979) 775-9599FIRM NO. F-928PDJ / JVCPDJSEP. 2025069294106CITY PROJECT NUMBER: PP2025-000008SURVEYOR:KERR SURVEYING, LLC.TBPELS FIRM #10018500SURVEY DATE: 3/19/20251718 BRIARCREST DRIVEBRYAN, TX 77802CONTACT: BRETT LAWLERPHONE: 979-268-3195PROPERTY OWNER:CULPEPPER FAMILY LP1700 GEORGE BUSH DRIVE E.COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840CONTACT: JOHN CULPEPPERPHONE: 979-696-1444PROPERTY LINEPROPOSED PROPERTY LINEADJACENT PROPERTY LINEEXISTING EASEMENTPROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTEXISTING CURBLINES (PUBLIC ROAD)PROPOSED CURBLINESPROPOSED STORM DRAINPROPOSED STORM JUNCTION BOXPROPOSED CURB INLETPROPOSED GRATE INLETEXISTING WATERLINEPROPOSED WATER LINEPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTPROPOSED WATER METEREXISTING SEWER LINEPROPOSED SEWER LINEEXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLEEXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRICEXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRICEXISTING ELECTRIC POLEEXISTING GAS LINEPROPOSED GAS LINEPROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRICPROPOSED UNDERGROUND COMMSLEGEND12'' WWSSSSOHEGASGASUGECOMMDS3 OF 4PUE'S AND UTILITIESUGENOR THPRELIMINARY NOT FOR RECORD·EX = EXISTING·IR = IRON ROD·PAE = PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT·PROP = PROPOSED·PUE = PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT·VW = VARIABLE WIDTH·TYP = TYPICALABBREVIATIONSPage 33 of 54 LINE TABLELINEL1L2L3L4L5L6L7L8L9L10LENGTH499.33'100.05'44.05'139.77'112.20'30.06'132.40'169.94'243.30'50.01'BEARINGS48°01'54"ES4°53'04"WS14°03'33"ES41°55'20"WN48°18'26"WN42°10'13"EN48°52'54"WS41°31'49"WS48°32'27"ES42°50'46"WLINE TABLELINEL11L12L13L14L15L16L17L81L82L83LENGTH147.05'168.84'92.73'72.29'17.80'11.00'241.17'93.41'22.81'14.20'BEARINGN48°30'11"WS42°15'19"WN47°48'32"WN41°58'54"ES9°51'14"EN81°54'55"ES41°58'06"WN47°48'16"WS45°58'05"ES78°00'42"ECURVE TABLECURVEC1C2C3C4RADIUS350.00'221.50'374.50'344.50'LENGTH114.32'115.98'59.18'248.65'CHORD BEARINGN38°27'07"WS63°00'42"ES3°54'47"ES21°17'27"WCHORD113.81'114.66'59.12'243.29'DELTA18°42'51"30°00'00"9°03'14"41°21'16"LINE TABLELINEL84L85L86L87LENGTH155.72'548.38'510.33'398.80'BEARINGS48°00'42"EN47°48'16"WN41°59'18"ES48°01'54"ELINE TABLELINEL22L23L24L25L26L27L28L29L30LENGTH22.81'14.20'27.27'155.72'251.21'243.30'6.02'147.05'50.01'BEARINGN45°58'05"WN78°00'42"WN61°46'04"EN48°00'42"WS48°00'42"EN48°32'27"WS41°59'22"WS48°30'11"EN42°50'46"ELINE TABLELINEL40L41L42L43L44L45L46L47L48LENGTH572.31'239.99'6.27'6.32'51.90'17.00'7.07'326.55'321.58'BEARINGS48°00'42"EN48°00'42"WN86°59'18"EN3°00'42"WS41°55'20"WS41°58'06"WN86°59'18"EN48°01'54"WS48°01'56"ECURVE TABLECURVEC7C8C9C10C11C12C25C26RADIUS344.50'374.50'221.50'178.50'21.50'64.50'14.50'14.50'LENGTH57.76'15.80'115.98'96.13'33.76'21.92'6.74'6.74'CHORD BEARINGS5°25'02"WS0°35'42"EN63°00'42"WS63°26'24"EN86°58'37"ES51°43'27"WN61°19'41"WS34°41'42"ECHORD57.70'15.80'114.66'94.97'30.40'21.81'6.68'6.68'DELTA9°36'25"2°25'02"30°00'00"30°51'24"89°58'38"19°28'16"26°37'59"26°37'59"LINE TABLELINEL54L55L56L57L58L59L60L61L62L63LENGTH14.20'10.00'68.36'68.36'8.50'5.00'87.36'167.85'111.83'9.48'BEARINGN78°00'42"WN81°54'55"EN48°00'42"WS48°00'42"ES41°59'18"WS41°59'18"WN48°00'42"WS48°00'42"EN48°32'27"WS41°59'18"WCURVE TABLECURVEC15C16C17C18C19C20C21C22C23C24RADIUS30.00'344.50'344.50'374.50'374.50'364.50'364.50'30.00'213.00'187.00'LENGTH20.08'43.61'48.10'20.45'59.18'42.28'19.79'15.99'111.53'100.71'CHORD BEARINGN58°50'23"WS4°14'25"WS4°36'48"WS0°57'02"ES3°54'47"EN5°07'36"WN0°14'53"WN85°51'46"EN63°00'42"WS63°26'24"ECHORD19.70'43.58'48.06'20.45'59.12'42.26'19.79'15.80'110.26'99.50'DELTA38°20'37"7°15'11"7°59'58"3°07'43"9°03'14"6°38'47"3°06'38"30°32'16"30°00'00"30°51'24"PROPERTY BOUNDARYSTREET CENTERLINESPUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENTSPUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTSLINE TABLELINEL64L65L66L67L68L69L70L71L72L73LENGTH67.28'15.00'67.32'16.34'9.38'9.53'130.83'31.00'131.30'86.00'BEARINGS42°15'19"WS47°42'37"EN42°15'19"ES48°30'11"EN41°59'18"EN41°59'18"ES48°00'42"EN42°50'46"EN48°00'42"WS48°00'42"ELINE TABLELINEL74L75L76L77L78L79L80LENGTH3.93'18.79'4.64'16.79'31.85'27.58'60.61'BEARINGN48°08'40"WS42°59'23"WS73°38'21"EN42°15'19"EN41°59'18"EN81°23'20"EN48°00'42"WLINE TABLELINEL31L32L33L34L35L36L37L38L39LENGTH60.80'68.80'15.62'23.94'15.43'33.13'86.00'29.02'29.03'BEARINGN48°00'42"WS41°59'18"WN48°00'42"WS41°31'49"WS48°00'42"ES41°59'18"WN41°58'06"ES0°13'41"ES84°11'12"WLINE TABLELINEL21L89LENGTH596.26'25.50'BEARINGS48°01'54"EN48°01'54"WLINE TABLELINEL49L50L51L52L53L88LENGTH12.00'128.95'30.41'86.00'30.41'246.32'BEARINGN41°52'07"EN41°59'18"EN3°00'42"WS48°00'42"ES86°59'18"WN48°00'42"WAS SHOWNAMENDED PRELIMINARY PLANCULPEPPER AT TAMULOTS 1, 2, & 3, BLOCK 1.10.84 ACRES(TOTAL NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS: 3)LOT 1, BLOCK 1 VOLUME-PAGE: 19599-63.& JOSEPH E. SCOTT LEAGUE SURVEY,ABSTRACT 50, COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOSCOUNTY, TEXASScaleDrawn byChecked byDateProject No.Sheet No.COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840614 HOLLEMAN DRIVE E, SUITE 1100Tel. No. (979) 775-9595Fax No. (979) 775-9599FIRM NO. F-928PDJ / JVCPDJSEP. 2025069294106CITY PROJECT NUMBER: PP2025-000008SURVEYOR:KERR SURVEYING, LLC.TBPELS FIRM #10018500SURVEY DATE: 3/19/20251718 BRIARCREST DRIVEBRYAN, TX 77802CONTACT: BRETT LAWLERPHONE: 979-268-3195PROPERTY OWNER:CULPEPPER FAMILY LP1700 GEORGE BUSH DRIVE E.COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840CONTACT: JOHN CULPEPPERPHONE: 979-696-14444 OF 4PRELIMINARY NOT FOR RECORDPage 34 of 54 Planning & Zoning Commission October 2, 2025 Scale Thirty (30) lots and five (5) common areas on approximately 50 acres of land Location Generally located in the City’s ETJ, southeast of the intersection of Greens Prairie Rd and Royder Rd Applicant Beamon Engineering Project Manager Gabriel Schrum, Staff Planner gschrum@cstx.gov Project Overview This preliminary plan was applied for at the end of July 2025. This preliminary plan includes the proposal of 30 single family lots, 5 common areas, and the continued projection of Wild Creek Road from Northwest to Southeast. There are 2 waivers being requested. The first waiver is specifically for the block length of the now connected Wild Creek Rd down to Royder Rd. The request is for the block length to be approximately 1,650ft compared to the typical city requirement of 1,500ft. The second waiver is to street projections for Triple Bend Rd located on the Northen portion of the property. The applicant has provided that the county will not maintain a creek crossing at this location aswell. The 10 AC remainder tract, will have public access via Triple Bend Rd. This preliminary plan is for a development consisting of a single-family lots located just outside of city limits in the City’s ETJ. Parkland Dedication Parkland dedication fees will be paid at the time of platting with a single family rate of $5,256 per dwelling unit. Traffic Impact Analysis A trip generation letter was provided, and no mitigation was deemed necessary as a result of the proposed development. Compliant with Comprehensive Plan (including Master Plans) and Unified Development Ordinance The preliminary plan is compliant with the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map, which is classified as Rural. Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes, with the exception of the proposed two (2) waiver requests. This waiver is related to block length (UDO Preliminary Plan for BERTRAM GROVE PP2025-000009 Page 35 of 54 Planning & Zoning Commission October 2, 2025 Section 8.4.E.1. ‘Blocks’) for Smalls Creek Rd between Royder Rd and Wild Creek Rd. The second waiver is related to street projections (UDO Section 8.4.C.3.a ‘Streets’) from the intersection of Wild Creek Rd and Smalls Creek Rd up to Triple Bend Rd. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the waiver and the Preliminary Plan. Supporting Materials 1. Waiver Request 2. Applicants Supporting Information 3. Aerial and Small Area Map 4. Preliminary Plan Page 36 of 54 SUBDIVISION WAIVER REQUEST The proposed Preliminary Plan is in compliance with the applicable Subdivision Regulations contained in the UDO except for the following waiver request: UDO Section 8.4.E.1. ‘Blocks’ -Per the requirements of this section, block length shall not exceed 1500’ for Rural context zones. As indicated in the waiver request, the request is for an increase in block length, which in this case extends along Smalls Creek Rd. As indicated in the graphic provided, the block length on Smalls Creek Rd is ~1,650’ (as shown below in Green). The applicant states that due to the existing condition of Wild Creek being located on this property they are requesting that the intersection 1,650’ from Royder Rd. They are requesting the approval of the waiver due to the existing site condition of the creek not being able to be altered. The applicant is requesting this waiver as their intention is to provide a single family subdivision in the City’s ETJ. The applicant states that granting of the waivers will not affect the subdivision of the adjacent property as there is an extension provided west to east through Wild Creek Rd and have Triple Bend Rd on the other side of the creek. Page 37 of 54 In accordance with the Subdivision Regulations, when considering a waiver the Planning and Zoning Commission should make the following findings to approve the waiver: 1) That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; The applicant is proposing a public right-of-way which is not meeting the block length requirements. The property is large, being a non-platted property of about 42 acres with a sizable creek area located near the rear of the property. This property is located just southeast of the intersection of Royder Rd and Greens Prairie Rd with a proposed extension of Wild Creek Ct being included within its bounds. This extension will go from the western property line to the eastern to allow for continuous access. 2) That the waivers are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; If the waiver is not granted, the subject property can still be subdivided. The property is over 42 acres in size and there is a minimum lot size of 1 acre within the City of College Station’s ETJ. While the subdivision is proposed to include thirty (30) lots, it may be reconfigured to still meet the requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance with block length. However, the applicant has stated the due to the special circumstances of the creek located on this property and the lack of being able to change the existing conditions, the development specifically would be disrupted, and modifications would be necessary. They also state that the block length waiver protects the neighbor to the east from needing to extend more streets than necessary onto their property. 3) The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering this chapter; and The granting of these waivers would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare of other properties in the area as this development will comply with all other standards and requirements found in the subdivision standards of the Unified Development Ordinance as they apply to properties located within the City of College Station’s ETJ. The applicant has stated the waivers will not be detrimental to the public because fire access and protection will still be adequate, and the limited number of acreage with the lots do not generate enough traffic to cause an issue with circulation and access to Royder Road or Greens Prairie Road. 4) That the granting of the waivers will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this Page 38 of 54 chapter. These waivers will not have a negative effect on the orderly subdivision of land in the area. Public access is still encompassed with the proposed streets being provided to connect to existing subdivisions as well as to provide for a future connection to the adjacent properties. With the exception of the waivers requested, they will be meeting the requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance. If the Commission approves the waiver, the Commission shall incorporate the findings of the waiver into the official minutes of the meetings at which such waiver is granted. If the waiver is denied, then the preliminary plan is also denied. For this preliminary plan to be approved as proposed, the waiver needs to be accepted. Waivers may be granted only when in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this UDO so that public health, safety, and welfare may be secured and substantial justice done. Staff is recommending approval of the waiver request. Page 39 of 54 UDO Section 8.4.C.3.a ‘Streets’ -Per the requirements of this section, When a public street is provided internal to the platting property and adjoining areas are not platted, the platting subdivision shall provide street projections to such areas by projecting a public street at intervals no fewer than the maximum block length along the perimeter boundary of the subdivision. As indicated in the waiver request, the request is for an exception to providing a street projection to the northeast with Triple Bend Rd. This can be seen at the intersection of Wild Creek Rd and Smalls Creek Road. As indicated in the graphic provided, the yellow portion shows the projection they are proposing to waive. Page 40 of 54 The applicant is requesting this waiver to street projections as their intention is to provide a single family subdivision in the City’s ETJ. The applicant states that the waiver will protect the rights of the neighbor to the north to not burden their property with a substantial drainage structure if they decide to develop in the future. The applicant has provided access points through the property with the extension of Wild Creek Rd and has provided a drainage study for the creek area that necessitates this waiver. In accordance with the Subdivision Regulations, when considering a waiver the Planning and Zoning Commission should make the following findings to approve the waiver: 1. That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; The applicant is requesting a waiver to street projection requirements through the property to the property line along the northeast to Triple Bend Rd. The applicant states that a meandering creek runs west to east on the property to the north, which would require a substantial drainage structure to cross the creek. Furthermore, there is already a ROW extended to the northern property from Triple Bend Road. 2. That the waivers are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; If the waiver is not granted, the subject property can still be subdivided. The property is over approximately 42 acres in size and there is a minimum lot size of 1 acre within the City of College Station’s ETJ. While the subdivision is proposed to include thirty (30) lots, it may be reconfigured to still meet the requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance with street projections. However, the applicant has stated the due to the special circumstances of the creek located on this property, and the lack of being able to change the existing conditions, the development specifically would be disrupted, and these modifications would be necessary. The applicant provided that the waiver for the street projection to the north, will protect the rights of the neighbor to the north to not burden their property with a substantial drainage structure if they decide to develop in the future. 3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering this chapter; and The granting of these waivers would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare of other properties in the area as this development will comply with all other standards and requirements found in the subdivision standards of the Unified Development Ordinance as they apply to properties located within the City of College Station. Page 41 of 54 The applicant has stated the waivers will not be detrimental to the public because fire access and protection will still be adequate and the limited number of acreage lots do not generate enough traffic to cause an issue with circulation and access to Royder Road or Greens Prairie Road. 4. That the granting of the waivers will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. These waivers will not have a negative effect on the orderly subdivision of land in the area. Public access is still encompassed with the proposed streets being provided to connect to existing subdivisions as well as to provide for a future connection to the adjacent properties. The applicant states if the waivers are not granted, then it possibly interrupts the orderly subdivision of land due to the size and shape of the existing neighboring properties. With the exception of the waivers requested, they will be meeting the requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance. If the Commission approves the waiver, the Commission shall incorporate the findings of the waiver into the official minutes of the meetings at which such waiver is granted. If the waiver is denied, then the preliminary plan is also denied. For this preliminary plan to be approved as proposed, the waiver needs to be accepted. Waivers may be granted only when in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this UDO so that public health, safety, and welfare may be secured and substantial justice done. Staff is recommending approval of the waiver request. Page 42 of 54 N4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " E 16 8 5 . 6 7 'S47° 48' 23"E399.17'S47° 48' 23"E398.70'S47° 48' 23"E398.24'S47° 48' 23"E397.77'S47° 48' 23"E397.30'S47° 48' 23"E396.83'S47° 48' 23"E60.85'S47° 48' 23"E335.50'S47° 48' 23"E335.50'S47° 48' 23"E335.50'S47° 48' 23"E335.50'S47° 48' 23"E335.50'N47° 48' 23"W335.50'N47° 48' 23"W335.50'N47° 48' 23"W335.50'N47° 48' 23"W8.00'N47° 48' 23"W7.36'N47° 48' 23"W26.00'N47° 48' 23"W19.00'N47° 48' 23"W397.26'N47° 48' 23"W336.62'N47° 48' 23"W336.62'N47° 48' 23"W336.62'S4 1 ° 0 3 ' 1 3 " W 41 4 . 4 0 ' S4 1 ° 0 3 ' 1 3 " W 38 1 . 8 1 ' S4 1 ° 0 3 ' 1 3 " W 34 9 . 2 2 ' S4 1 ° 0 3 ' 1 3 " W 37 0 . 0 8 ' S4 1 ° 0 3 ' 1 3 " W 38 3 . 2 3 ' S4 1 ° 0 3 ' 1 3 " W 40 6 . 0 2 'N47° 48' 23"W61.11'N47° 48' 23"W336.62'N47° 48' 23"W377.80'N47° 48' 23"W343.50'N47° 48' 23"W335.50'N4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " E 13 0 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " E 13 0 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " E 13 0 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " E 13 0 . 0 0 ' N4 1 ° 5 9 ' 1 8 " E 13 0 . 0 0 ' N4 1 ° 5 9 ' 1 8 " E 13 0 . 0 0 ' S4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " W 13 0 . 0 0 ' S4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " W 13 0 . 0 0 ' S4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " W 13 0 . 0 0 ' S4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " W 14 3 . 8 5 ' N4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " E 13 0 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " E 13 0 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " E 13 0 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " E 13 0 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " E 13 0 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " E 13 0 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " E 13 0 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " E 13 0 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " E 13 0 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " E 13 0 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " E 13 0 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " E 29. 8 9 ' N4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " E 13 0 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " E 13 0 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " E 13 0 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " E 13 0 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " E 13 0 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " E 13 0 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " E 13 0 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " E 12 8 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " E 12 8 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " E 12 8 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " E 12 8 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " E 11 2 . 8 9 'N46° 47' 32"W374.71'N42° 24' 10"E130.81'N42 ° 2 4 ' 1 0 " E 12 8 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 2 4 ' 1 0 " E 12 8 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 2 4 ' 1 0 " E 12 8 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 2 4 ' 1 0 " E 12 8 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 2 4 ' 1 0 " E 13 0 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 2 4 ' 1 0 " E 13 0 . 0 0 ' N4 2 ° 2 4 ' 1 0 " E 69 7 . 5 6 'S34° 52' 24"E123.23'S34° 52' 24"E134.02'S34° 52' 24"E134.02'S34° 52' 24"E4.67'S58° 53' 21"E127.39'S58° 53' 21"E76.14'S58° 53' 21"E131.98'S58° 53' 21"E141.41'S41° 59' 18"W430.49'S41° 59' 18"W70.01'S4 1 ° 5 9 ' 1 8 " W 83 7 . 8 6 ' S4 1 ° 5 9 ' 1 6 " W 52 8 . 3 6 ' S4 1 ° 5 9 ' 1 8 " W 13 0 . 0 0 ' S4 1 ° 5 9 ' 1 8 " W 13 0 . 0 0 'S48° 56' 47"E130.00'S48° 56' 47"E130.00'S48° 56' 47"E130.00'S48° 56' 47"E130.00'S48° 56' 47"E75.00'S48° 56' 47"E130.00'N46° 47' 32"W305.67'N46° 47' 32"W120.01'N46° 47' 32"W63.04'S4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " W 13 0 . 0 0 ' S4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " W 13 0 . 0 0 ' S4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " W 13 0 . 0 0 ' S4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " W 13 0 . 0 0 ' S4 2 ° 1 1 ' 3 7 " W 13 0 . 0 0 'N2° 17' 57"W35.67'N46° 47' 32"W6.00'N47° 48' 23"W351.33'CORNER BEARS S43° 40' 57"W14343.22' FROM CM NO. 11 TO5/8" IRON RODN43° 12' 28"E19.34'N2° 17' 57"W17.12'N42° 11' 37"E6.00'N42° 11' 37"E106.89'N47° 48' 23"W19.34'DS48° 56' 47"E369.36'S48° 56' 47"E368.38'DTS48° 56' 47"E132.26'288290292294296298300302304306304302300298296 294 292290288286284284 288286290294296 298298 3 0 030029829629029229429029429029229428828628628 8 290 3043002982962 8 6 28628 4 294292290 2883 0 4 3023002982962942922872882892 9 0 2 8 8 295 2 9 0 2 9 6 30 2 30 3 30 0 29 7 29629529329428729029228628 5 284303302301300299298297292291293300299298297296 295296297298S48° 56' 47"E428.75'S48° 56' 47"E428.76'N42° 24' 10"E70.02'N42° 24' 10"E444.49'N41° 59' 18"E52.51'S46° 47' 32"E869.81'S42° 24' 10"W52.51'G R E E N S P R A I R I E R O A D ROYDER ROADWELLBORN ROADI&GN ROADVI C T O R I A A V E KO P P E B R I D G E R D SWEETWATER DRWOODLAKE DRETONBURY AVE.01202403601" = 120'60PERMITS NOTECONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS REQUIREDBY FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICECOMPANIES PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION.INSPECTIONS/CERTIFICATIONS NOTEALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIREDBY LOCAL CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES SHALL BEPERFORMED PRIOR TO SUBSTANTIAL PROJECT COMPLETION.SITE INFORMATIONOWNER/DEVELOPER:BARGAS DEVELOPMENT4040 SH 6 SOUTH, SUITE 200COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845PH. 979-224-5147LEGAL DESCRIPTION:A001300, SAMUEL DAVIDSON (OCL),TRACT 46, 50. ACRESADDRESS:16141 ROYDER ROADCOLLEGE STATION, TXPROPOSED LAND USE:SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIALLAND AREA:TOTAL 42.18 ACRESENGINEER:DANIEL BEAMONBEAMON ENGINEERING, LLC11198 ELLA LANEHEARNE, TX 77859SURVEYOR:RHEMA SURVEYING AND MAPPING23735 SAN BARRIA DR.KATY, TX 77493# LOTS:30 LOTS AND 5 COMMON AREASDENSITY:0.7 LOTS/ACRECURRENT LAND USE:SINGLE FAMILY/AGRICULTUREC-3.01"=120'PRELIMINARY PLAN PROPOSED 16' PUE(TYP. ALONG ROW)Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRTHIS DRAWING AND RELATED SPECIFICATIONS, INCLUDING ALL DOCUMENTS ON ELECTRONIC MEDIA, WERE PREPARED BY BEAMON ENGINEERING AS INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF JPI. THE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE USED ONLY BY THE CLIENT TO WHOM SERVICES ARE RENDERED AND ONLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF DESCRIBING, CONSTRUCTING, OR INSTALLING THE WORK SHOWNHEREON AT THE DESIGNATED LOCATION ON THE SPECIFIED SITE. ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THESE DOCUMENTS, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION REPRODUCTION OR ALTERATION, IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED AND SHALL CAUSE THE WAIVER OF ANY EXPRESSED WARRANTIES AND ALSO SEVER ANY LIABILITIES WHICH MAY ARISE FROM THE CONSTRUCTION, USE OR RESULT OF SUCH UNAUTHORIZED USE OR CHANGES. DATEBYDESCRIPTIONNO. REVISIONSDRAWN BY:SCALE:CHECKED BY:JOB NO.:DATE:SHEET NO.:2025-RRPBERTRAM GROVE SUBDIVISION BCAD PROPERTY ID 11120 A001300, SAMUEL DAVIDSON (OCL), TRACT 46, 50. ACRES BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXASSEPT. 17, 2025DPBDANIEL P. BEAMON105876SEPTEMBER 17, 2025REFERENCE MARKERSIF THE CONTRACTOR RELOCATES REFERENCE MARKERS WITH ANEW REFERENCE MARKER, IT SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN AHORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL TOLERANCE OF 0.10'11198 ELLA LANE HEARNE, TEXAS 77859 PH. (979) 571-2407 TBPE FIRM NO. F-21588 BEAMON ENGINEERINGBDPBBM 1A 5/8 INCH IRON RODNORTHEAST CORNEROF PARENT TRACTELEVATION = 286.76 FEETNORTHING: 10,178,143.1700'EASTING: 3,572,343.2880'BM 2SHOWN ON PLANSELEVATION = 289.49 FEETNORTHING: 10,176,725.0100'EASTING: 3,570,131.9170'BM 3SHOWN ON PLANSELEVATION = 301.09 FEETNORTHING: 10,177,135.0900'EASTING: 3,570,748.7320'TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY NOTEEXISTING HORIZONTAL CONTROL AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESEPLANS WAS PREPARED BY RHEMA SURVEYING AND MAPPING OF KATY, TX. IFCONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THEPLANS, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, HE SHALL HAVE MADE, AT HIS EXPENSE, ATOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR AND SUBMIT IT TO THEOWNER FOR REVIEW. THE ENGINEER'S SEAL ON THESE PLANS DOES NOT APPLY TOTHE PROPERTY BOUNDARY INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON.PROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPOSED LEGENDPROPOSED HEADWALLPROPOSED WATER METERPROPOSED WATER LINEPROPOSED CULVERTPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTPROPOSED ROW BOUNDARYPROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENTPROPOSED GATE VALVEPROPOSED LOT LINEPROPOSED EASEMENT LINEFG= 392.00PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONPROPOSED MAJOR CONTOURPROPOSED MINOR CONTOUREXISTING CONTOURCOLOR OF EXISTING ITEMS TOBE REMOVED320322320PROPOSED FHPROPOSED 8"WELLBORN WATER LINECOMMON AREA / VARIABLE WIDTHPRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENTPUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTRIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION (1.05 ACRES)FUTURE ROYDER ROW = 105'105' / 2 = 52.5' TOTAL ROW DEDICATIONPRELIMINARY PLAN CERTIFICATIONTHE COMMISSIONER'S COURT OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS VOTEDAFFIRMATIVELY TO RECOMMEND CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF THIS PRELIMINARYPLAN, SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS ENUMERATED IN MINUTES OF THIS DATE.DATED THIS ______ DAY OF ______________, 20______._______________________________COUNTY JUDGEBRAZOS COUNTY, TEXASG.1 Development NoteNo structure or land within this plat shall hereafter be located or altered without first obtaining aDevelopment Permit from the Brazos County floodplain administrator.The minimum lowest finished floor elevation shall be one (1) foot higher than the highest spot elevationthat is located within five (5) feet outside the perimeter of the building, or two (2) feet above the BaseFlood Elevation (“BFE”), whichever is higher.G.2 MailboxesRural mailboxes shall be set five (5) feet from the edge of the pavement or behind curbs, when used. Allmailboxes within county arterial right‐of‐way shall meet the current TxDOT standards. Any mailbox thatdoes not meet this requirement may be removed by Brazos County.For Single‐Family Residential Developments, Multi‐Unit Residential Developments or ManufacturedHome Communities, Neighbor Delivery and Collection Box Units (“NDCBUs”), or community mailboxes,shall be required. If possible, these mailbox units should be installed on low volume intersectingroadways or on private property. Locations for the NDCBUs shall be shown on the construction Plans.G.3 Roadway ConstructionIn approving this plat by the Commissioner’s Court of Brazos County, Texas, it is understood that thebuilding of all roads, and other public thoroughfares and any bridges or culverts necessary to beconstructed or placed is the responsibility of the owner(s) of the tract of land covered by this plat inaccordance with the plans and specifications prescribed by the Commissioner’s Court of Brazos County,Texas. Said Commissioner’s Court assumes no obligation to build any of the roads, or other publicthoroughfares shown on this plat, or of constructing any of the bridges or drainage improvements inconnection therewith. The County will assume no responsibility for drainage ways or easements in thesubdivision, other than those draining or protecting the road system.G.4 Owner’s ResponsibilitiesIt is the responsibility of the owner, not the County, to assure compliance with the provisions of allapplicable state, federal and local laws and regulations relating to the platting and Development of thisproperty.The County assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of representations by the other parties in thisplat. Floodplain data, in particular, may change. It is further understood that the owners of the tract ofland covered by this plat must install at their own expense all traffic control devices and signage thatmay be required before the roads in the subdivision have finally been accepted for maintenance by theCounty.BRAZOS COUNTY NOTES:LOTS 1 THROUGH 30 SHALL PROVIDE AMINIMUM 18" CULVERT TO MAINTAINACCEPTABLE STORMWATER FLOW INTHE DITCH.DRIVEWAY CULVERTS:VICINITY MAP 1" = 2000'PROJECTLOCATIONPROPOSED MAILBOXCLUSTER LOCATIONNEW DRIVEWAYS ARE NOT ALLOWEDON ROYDER ROAD.DRIVEWAY NOTE:PRELIMINARY PLANNOT FOR RECORDPROPOSED 20' PUBLICUTILITY ESMT (TYP.) ALONGALL INTERIOR LOT LINESPROPOSED 10' PUBLICUTILITY ESMTCITY LIMITSCITY LIMITSEXISTING LEGEND“” PROPOSED 18"DRIVEWAY CULVERTCI T Y O F C O L L E G E S T A T I O N CITY LIMITS24.0' 24 . 0 '24.0'30.0'24.0'30.0'70.0'24. 0 ' 30. 0 ' 70. 0 'PROPOSED 8"WELLBORN WATER LINECOMMON AREA / VARIABLE WIDTHPRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENTPUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTCOMMON AREA / VARIABLE WIDTHPRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENTPUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTPROPOSED 8"WELLBORN WATER LINEPROPOSED FHPROPOSED FHPROPOSED TIE IN FORWELLBORN WATER LINEPROPOSED 20' PUBLICUTILITY ESMT (TYP.) ALONGALL INTERIOR LOT LINESPROPOSED 10' PUBLICUTILITY ESMTPROP. 16' PUBLICUTILITY ESMTPROPOSED 16' PUBLICUTILITY ESMTPROPOSED 10' PUBLICUTILITY ESMTPROPOSED 10' PUBLICUTILITY ESMTEXISTING HOUSETO BE REMOVEDPROPOSED ASPHALTPAVEMENTPROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENTUSING EXISTING BASE MATERIALAS SUBBASE. SUBBASE THICKNESSTO BE NO LESS THAN 6":PROJECTED CENTERLINEOF ROYDER ROADEXISTING 36"CORRUGATED METALPIPE TO REMAINEXISTING (3) BARRELL 48"CORRUGATED METAL PIPESTO REMAINEXISTING DRIVEWAYTO BE REMOVEDPROPOSED TIE IN FORWELLBORN WATER LINEROYDER ROADROW LINEPROJECTED ROYDERROAD ROW LINEEXISTING TRAFFICSIGNAL ARM52.5'PROPOSED STORMWATERDETENTION AREA75,388 CUFT OF STORAGEPROPOSED STORMWATERDETENTION AREA62,825 CUFT OF STORAGEPROPOSED STORMWATERDETENTION AREA47,065 CUFT OF STORAGEPROPOSED STORMWATERDETENTION AREA50,516 CUFT OF STORAGEPROPOSED 15' PUBLICUTILITY AND PRIVATEDRAINAGE EASEMENTPROPOSED 10' PUBLICUTILITY EASEMENTPROPOSED 20' PUBLICUTILITY ESMT (TYP.) ALONGALL INTERIOR LOT LINESPROPOSED 20' PUBLICUTILITY ESMT (TYP.) ALONGALL INTERIOR LOT LINESPROPOSED 8"WELLBORN WATER LINEPROPOSEDSTREET LIGHTPROPOSEDSTREET LIGHTPROPOSEDSTREET LIGHTCOMMON AREA NO. 5 (591 SF)AND PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGNFIELD NOTES:BEING A 41.02 ACRE TRACT OUT OF A CALLED 52.19 ACRE TRACT OF LAND APPEARS TO BE VESTED INSOUTH RANCH, LLC, A TEXAS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY RECORDED IN THE OFFICIAL PUBLICRECORDS BRAZOS COUNTY TEXAS VOL. 8993, PG. 20 AND BEING PART OF THE SAMUEL DAVIDSONSURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 13 AND BEING SITUATED ABOUT ONE MILE SOUTHEAST OF WELLBORN ANDALSO BEING TRACT NO. 3 AND 4 OF THE SUBDIVISION OF A SEVEN HUNDRED (700) ACRE TRACT OUTOF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAMUEL DAVIDSON SURVEY AS SURVEYED AND PLATED BY H.O.JONES, COUNTY SURVEYOR OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS;COMMENCING AT A FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD (IR) BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID 52.19 ACRETRACT AND BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF A CALLED 50 ACRE TRACT OF LAND RECORDED INVOL. 2824, PG. 136 O.P.R.B.C.T.;THENCE:S 41°59'18" W A DISTANCE OF 47.51' TO A SET 5/8" IR FOR THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THEHEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT AND BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE: S 41°59'18" W A LONG THE SAID WEST LINE OF A CALLED 50 ACRE TRACT OF LAND APASSING A FOUND 5/8" IR A DISTANCE OF DISTANCE OF 2127.37' AND A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 2657.35'TO A POINT IN THE PRESCRIPTIVE ROW OF ROYDER AND BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THEHEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT;THENCE: N 46°47'32" W ALONG SAID ROYDER ROAD A DISTANCE OF 869.81' TO A POINT IN THE SAIDROYDER ROAD;THENCE: N 42°24'10" E PASSING A FOUND 5/8" I.R. AT A DISTANCE OF 58.38' CONTINUING A LONG THEWEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 2494.05 TO A SET 5/8" IR AND BEING THENORTHWEST CORNER OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT;THENCE S 34°52'24" W A DISTANCE OF 395.95' TO A ANGLE POINT OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT;THENCE S 58°53'21" E A DISTANCE OF 476.92' TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 41.02ACRE (1786664 SQ. FT) OF LAND MORE OR LESS.PROPOSED VARIABLE WIDTHPRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENTPROPOSED VARIABLE WIDTHPRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENTPROPOSED VARIABLE WIDTHPRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENTPROPOSED VARIABLE WIDTHPRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENTPROPOSED 8' PRIVATEDRAINAGE EASEMENTPROPOSED PRIVATEDRAINAGE EASEMENT30. 0 ' 24. 0 'TEMPORARY ACCESS EASEMENTFOR TEMPORARY TURNAROUNDPER BRAZOS COUNTY SPECSTYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION3'12'12'3'35'35'70' RIGHT OF WAY5 : 1 M IN .ROADWAY CENTERLINE8" COMPACTEDSTABILIZED SUBGRADE6" GRADE 1 BASE2" TYPE D HMAC9.0'8.0'3'5:1 MIN.8.0'3'9.0'4:1 MAX.4 : 1 MAX .16'PUBLIC UTILITYEASEMENT16'PUBLIC UTILITYEASEMENT4' MIN. BURYPROPOSED 8" WELLBORNWATER LINE3% SLOPE3% SLOPEBASE MATERIAL TO BE PLACED TOELIMINATE ABRUPT DROP OFF FROM 2" HMAC2' OF BASE SHOULDER TO BE ASPHALTPRIMED BOTH SIDES.CROSS SLOPE OF SHOULDER TO MATCHCROSS SLOPE OF PAVEMENT.MIN. 18" DEPTH TYP.Page 43 of 54 October 2, 2025 Item No. 5.3. Summit Crossing Expansion -2 Sponsor: Jeff Howell, Senior Planner Reviewed By CBC: N/A Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, "Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundary from GC General Commercial to MF Multi-Family for approximately 4.71 acres generally located south of the intersection of University Drive East and East Crest Drive. Case #REZ2025-000022 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the October 9, 2025 City Council Meeting – Subject to change) Relationship to Strategic Goals: Diverse and Growing Economy Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of this rezoning request with the following condition: A 10’ landscape buffer with an 8’ fence in accordance with Section 7.7.F. of the Unified Development Ordinance as required between GC General Commercial and MF Multi-Family uses be provided along the western property line of the MF Multi-Family portion of this rezoning adjacent to Lot 1, Block 1, Crescent Pointe Phase 1 and Lot 4, Block 1, Crescent Pointe Phase 1 be provided on the subject property at time of site development. Summary: This request is to rezone approximately 4.71 acres of land generally located south of the intersection of University Drive East and East Crest Drive from GC General Commercial to MF Multi- Family. The area proposed to be rezoned consists of a portion of an un-platted property and is currently vacant. The property was originally zoned R Rural upon annexation to the City in 1980 and the GC General Commercial rezoning taking place later in 2008. This zoning request is in effort to provide additional housing and residential density to the area. This request is an expansion to a recent rezoning request that was approved on August 14, 2025 which included the same condition. The applicant is requesting the MF Multi-Family zoning district for a proposed multi-family development which would not be permitted within the GC General Commercial zoning district. REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan: The subject tract is partially designated as General Commercial on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character Map. For the General Commercial land use, the Comprehensive Plan provides the following: Areas appropriate for concentrated areas of commercial activities that cater to both nearby residents and to the larger community or region. Generally, these areas tend to be large and located along regionally significant roads. Due to their context, these areas tend to prioritize automobile mobility. The intent of the General Commercial land use is to accommodate a commercial uses, concentrate development at major intersections, and encourage shared surface parking. The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within the General Commercial land use include: General commercial, office, and mixed-use zoning. Page 44 of 54 A portion of subject tract was also recently designated as Urban Residential on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use & Character Map. For the Urban Residential land use, the Comprehensive Plan provides the following: Areas appropriate for a range of high-density multifamily and attached residential development in various forms. Buildings may be clustered and grouped. Building setback from street varies but is generally consistent within a development. Also, they are to support commercial, service, office uses, and vertical mixed-use within redevelopment areas. The intent of the Urban Residential land use is to accommodate a wide range of attractive multifamily housing for a diverse population. Buildings may be clustered and grouped with connectivity between developments The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within the Urban Residential land use include: Multi-family, townhouse, mixed-use, and limited suburban commercial zoning. The Comprehensive Plan serves as a guide to achieve the community’s vision for the future. It anticipates and guides physical development in a manner that provides College Station with a balance of land uses that promote economic development while retaining the quality of life. The future land use designations are generally flexible and are not tied to a specific boundary as compared to the zoning district. This is also more apparent as the property has not been subdivided or there are no natural features dictating the boundary (i.e. floodplain). The proposed rezoning request to MF Multi-Family is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as the request will be providing a development with permitted uses allowed by the zoning district. 2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of the surrounding area: The subject property is near other existing multi-family zoned property and office uses. To the south, the area remains undeveloped and was recently rezoned to MF Multi-Family. The other surrounding properties are zoned GC General Commercial. To the west, the property is developed as an existing office development, while the property to the north and east are vacant. The proposed zoning district is appropriate in the context of the area as it would allow for infill with additional housing options to be located adjacent to similar development. Access to major thoroughfares including University Drive East and an extension of Summit Crossing Lane would be coordinated through platting and connecting to the existing developments. 3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district: The size and location of the subject property is suitable for multi-family but would have to conform to the density standards for the district. The site also has adequate space to meet the minimal dimensional standards as set forth in the Unified Development Ordinance. This request would expand the MF Multi-Family area when taking into consideration the adjacent area that was rezoned in August 2025. 4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district: The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of this development. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with site development shall be designed Page 45 of 54 and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design Guidelines. The subject property is located near the intersection of University Drive East and East Crest Drive. University Drive East is identified as a Major Arterial on the Thoroughfare Plan. Additional right-of-way will need to be continued and dedicated as part of the platting process to provide circulation and connect to existing roadways. The use is expected to generate more than 150 trips in any peak hour; therefore, a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was required to be submitted with the application. As part of the TIA, mitigation recommendations included a signal to be provided at University Drive East and East Crest Drive and a roundabout or signal along Harvey Road at Summit Crossing Lane. 5. The marketability of the property: The applicant states the property can be marketable for commercial uses, and 15 acres of commercial land has been preserved closer to University Drive East to develop it for commercial uses. Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. Aerial and Small Area Map 2. Rezoning Exhibit 3. Background Information 4. Applicant’s Supporting Information 5. Rezoning Map 6. Existing Future Land Use Map Page 46 of 54 Page 47 of 54 Page 48 of 54 THE SUMMIT CROSSING LLCJAMES W. SCOTT, TRACT 35.1 (PART OF)ACRES: 4.71 OF 31.978Existing Zoning: GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC)ADAM PLAZA PROPERTIES INC,CRESCENT POINTEPH 1, BLOCK 1, LOT 4,ACRES: 9Existing Zoning: GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC)ADAM PLAZA PROPERTIES INC,CRESCENT POINTEPH 1, BLOCK 1, LOT 1,ACRES: 21.71Existing Zoning: GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC)THE SUMMIT CROSSING LLCJAMES W. SCOTT, TRACT 35.1 (PART OF)ACRES: 10.838 OF 31.978Existing Zoning: GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC)TECHNOLODGING LP TECHNOFOODS INC &SALIM ISMAILJAMES W. SCOTT, TRACT 9 (PART OF)ACRES: 11.697 OF 12.545Existing Zoning: GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC)THE SUMMIT CROSSING LLCJAMES W. SCOTT, TRACT 35.1 (PART OF)ACRES: 7.754 OF 31.978Existing Zoning: MULTI-FAMILY (MF)THE SUMMIT CROSSING LLCJAMES W. SCOTT, TRACT 35.1 (PART OF)ACRES: 9.472 OF 31.978Existing Zoning: TOWNHOUSE (T)UNIVERSITY E DR50' MOBILE PIPELINE CO. EASEMENT(7573/51)70' TEXASMUNICIPAL POWERAGENCY EASEMENT(797/279)THE SUMMIT CROSSING LLCJAMES W. SCOTT, TRACT 35.1 (PART OF)ACRES: 4.71 OF 31.978Proposed Zoning: MULTI-FAMILY (MF)ADAM PLAZA PROPERTIES INC,CRESCENT POINTEPH 1, BLOCK 1, LOT 4,ACRES: 9Existing Zoning: GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC)ADAM PLAZA PROPERTIES INC,CRESCENT POINTEPH 1, BLOCK 1, LOT 1,ACRES: 21.71Existing Zoning: GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC)THE SUMMIT CROSSING LLCJAMES W. SCOTT, TRACT 35.1 (PART OF)ACRES: 10.838 OF 31.978Existing Zoning: GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC)TECHNOLODGING LP TECHNOFOODS INC &SALIM ISMAILJAMES W. SCOTT, TRACT 9 (PART OF)ACRES: 11.697 OF 12.545Existing Zoning: GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC)THE SUMMIT CROSSING LLCJAMES W. SCOTT, TRACT 35.1 (PART OF)ACRES: 7.754 OF 31.978Existing Zoning: MULTI-FAMILY (MF)THE SUMMIT CROSSING LLCJAMES W. SCOTT, TRACT 35.1 (PART OF)ACRES: 9.472 OF 31.978Existing Zoning: TOWNHOUSE (T)UNIVERSITY E DR50' MOBILE PIPELINE CO. EASEMENT(7573/51)70' TEXASMUNICIPAL POWERAGENCY EASEMENT(797/279)BOONVILLE RDUNIVERSITY E DRSITERevisions SEPTEMBER 2025 Designed by: OTHER Drawn By: MAB Checked By: VJBM PROJECT BENCHMARK: For Interim Review Only These documents are not intended for construction, bidding, or permit purposes. Prepared by: Veronica J.B. Morgan, P.E. No. 77689 www.mitchellandmorgan.comPLAN & DESIGN SPECIALISTS INCIVIL ENGINEERING HYDRAULICS****HYDROLOGY UTILITIES STREETSSITE PLANS SUBDIVISIONS3204 EARL RUDDER FWY. S.COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845T.979.260.6963F.979.260.3564TX. FIRM # F-1443Prepared For: Mike Novelli Cypressbrook Company 1776 Woodstead Court, Suite 218 The Woodlands, TX 77380 REZONING MAP ARIZA COLLEGE STATION 4.71 ACRE TRACT The Summit Crossing LLC 809 University Dr. E College Station, TX 77840 LEGEND MF - MULTI-FAMILYT - TOWNHOUSEGC - GENERALCOMMERCIALMAJOR ARTERIALPD - PLANNEDDEVELOPMENT DISTRICTR-4 - MULTI-FAMILYRZEXISTINGVICINITY MAPPROPOSEDPage 49 of 54 BACKGROUND INFORMATION NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: October 2, 2025 Advertised Council Hearing Date: October 9, 2025 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: Summit Crossing HOA Property owner notices mailed: 8 Contacts in support: None at the time of this report Contacts in opposition: None at the time of this report Inquiry contacts: None at the time of this report ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North General Commercial GC General Commercial Vacant South Urban Residential MF Multi-Family Office, Vacant East General Commercial, Urban Residential GC General Commercial, MF Multi-Family Vacant West General Commercial GC General Commercial Office DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexed: September 1980 Zoning: A-O Agricultural-Open (upon annexation 1980) A-O Agricultural-Open to C-1 General Commercial (2008) C-1 General Commercial renamed to GC General Commercial (2012) Final Plat: Unplatted Site Development: Vacant Page 50 of 54 Name of Project:SUMMIT CROSSING EXPANSION-2 (REZ2025-000022) Address:N/A Legal Description:A004901, J W SCOTT (ICL), TRACT 35.1, 31.978 ACRES Total Acreage:4.71 Applicant:: Property Owner:THE SUMMIT CROSSING LLC CRISSY HARTL List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. On August 14, 2025, the City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and rezoning requests for multi-family and townhome uses in the Summit Crossing development. Due to negotiations with the neighboring Adam Corporation before the City Council meeting, the applicant withdrew a portion of the multi-family request, referred to as Tract 1, with the intent to bring back a new application to reflect the adjusted property configuration. This rezoning request is the remainder of the multi-family portion of the development. Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. The Comprehensive Plan was recently amended to reflect Urban land uses as being appropriate for this property. The requested zone change to MF Multi-family is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood? Commercial uses can be suitable on this property, and approximately 15 acres of commercial has been preserved closer to University Drive East. Office and multi-family uses have been developed in the vicinity of the property and would be a suitable land use. However, multi-family housing is highly desired in College Station and more suitable for the property. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested. Summit Crossing is developing into a mixed-use area that includes commercial uses and a mix of residential units including multi-family and townhomes that were recently approved by the City Council. Rezoning the additional acreage for multi-family uses is suitable for this property. REZONING APPLICATION SUPPORTING INFORMATION Page 1 of 2 Page 51 of 54 Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. Summit Crossing is developing into a mixed-use area that includes commercial uses and a mix of residential units including multi-family and townhomes that were recently approved by the City Council. Rezoning the additional acreage for multi-family uses is suitable for this property. Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. The property can be marketable for commercial uses, and 15 acres of commercial land has been preserved closer to University Drive East to develop it for commercial uses. List any other reasons to support this zone change. N/A Page 2 of 2 Page 52 of 54 Page 53 of 54 Page 54 of 54