Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
08/04/2005 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning Commission
(*if FILE COPY CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning eir Development Services AGENDA Workshop Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, August 4, 2005 at 6:00 p.m. Administrative Conference Room, City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 1. Call the meeting to order. 2• Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. 3. Presentation, discussion, and possible action of the P &Z Plan of Work. 4. Presentation, discussion, and possible action of the draft Subdivision Regulations. 5. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the joint meeting between College Station and Bryan P &Z Commissions. 6. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the P &Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: August 8, 2005 — New Commissioner Orientation August 18, 2005 - Parks & Rec. Board - Amendments to the Code of Ordinances, Chapter 9: Subdivisions, Section 10: Requirements for Park Land Dedication; Northgate Ordinance TI3A — Transportation Tour 7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 8. Adjourn Consultation with Attorney {Gov't Code Section 551.0711 ; possible action. The Planning and Zoning Commission may seek advice from its attorney regarding a pending and contemplated litigation subject or attorney - client privileged information. After executive session discussion, any final action or vote taken will be in public. If litigation or attorney -client privileged information issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, an executive session will be held. This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicapped parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call 979 -764 -3517 or ('IDD) 1- 800 -735- 2989. Agendas posted on Internet \Vebsite http : / /www.cstx.gov and Cable Access Channel 19. 1) 0 ai c., .... „ R I= -= a:u al) in LI: 0 ., -4.4 ...I...) C:::) 1— ...., <1.) c..) (::::, N >, ■CD A t 7 1... a -0 0 1- c...) -0 It) cz ti) 'Th • *-.''' 2 1 CA 0 -- 'rr cs rZ o 0 zA • — • -k L. zl, • 5 i--) --, , (J) hii cts A 4., 0 -4....= a, v co) a) 0 0 0 = 0 czt 0 0 0 t) -.1...) C/ ■r Pm* = 0L. - c - 1 ---, a) 0 4.4 et IMI. C... • P.M ,,,••••■ 0 ^ ^ V) 7 0 '-' • ,-- 0 ,..., ■•-', T.) (1.) ), ^ > 0 ..... (._ ,-4 e4 - v) a) • — • — ce: - - >< - ,—, - .-. tv - • • a.) :‘ gi., . 0 • Mg (/) '-; ( v-- 'v 0 Clp cri a Cd al 0 CA ct o) LA t.., ........ c).) •—■ - o 0 7 "-4 c I 0 (5 , 0 0 , - , a ( a • !no Q.) • • -. --■ . -, , 0 a_ E 4... ,a), 0 () ?!) -4--! Z 4 .-• , Z Ct CI E Q • ,..s c:, Cn ....., Z • ,-, --, Z DO -- 0 ,-.■ 0 • ...., 4,1 g t.,_, ,,.._0 0 - g s _., ,_. 0 0 • ,ss 0 0 8 0 0 0 - 00 0 0 el ., c : .-, •,-, g - › 4. .•-• • 0 • - , • - ›. • . 0 cn N c.., ..z: 0 ? tt s–, (1) ..0 v O to 0 . _ 0 o CND -0 OD . , u) : N . _ > c_) N -- ›, z a.) : 1. v) -4 Cd , P. gi: 0 c.4 a.) ci) 0 0 (u 0 CI •—, o > .) . E 0 0 i., ct ;..u) a. .2 - E 0 .-- O 0 1-> P4 6 - ct-, 0 u 4c te 'a.' ›, t±..1 " --0 , m 0 . • c-, ,._ ia: cf- &) o E (1) 0 0 04 cg o '2 I) I. • ''' C1) a Ct E 0 0 ,— ...., . 0 g 5 ,..0 • - .4.-:. ,„:, 0 CD (1) cl) .... r 2 - Cu ,--, • ,-, > 0 — Ni (4 •q: if. v6 N: 06 , . ao 0 ....... a> N V V ra- tio 41) 4....s ...0 H >. 0 p, - o Co) 2 In m - a © a in . 4) f o i --. ta, cs cz - T. 1 v) a.. k. IV 424 c4, o) .-..) C.) ,...) • ..,-- ...?. ' ...,, , ?... s • ...., • P.• 4.4 4.• 61 al 4-c Cf) (.., 0 (,...)) H co') -■1:. Q.) 4* •.,- 1:, — 04 C) CI -4.4 • ■,... A ct 0 .`" = • .... (...) .1.4 CI : V V V Me. 0 Pla4 CI .674 V ... 4- ,-, ;•.1 1) 4 a' a.) 0 I) 0 > o > o > C.) '5 0 (i) 0 cd) - • Poi Id E 6), 0 E . E 6), .....) c., ('1 ,_. 0 c, . " ,..... . .4., _ 7) r a — ,-, • Poi +.4 .-o 0 E C/D 0 +.1 CI ° 4--■ ) t.0 ° 0 (L.) 'L. 0.4 C) Clo 7, ca., 9 • , „› aa- E a3 n_ 6 , ct.) 0 1„) 1.) - C I E .....) 0.. I. 0 c, ..". a) ai 0 *-- 1_, -0 cl) • ,_. ec, ''' 73 .. al ,..,"." ( ID ."-• ,---.. ^ © .0 4.-■ —, C/D ...0 co vi up t4 Lai) •- -E7 Cass) 0 0 W s--, :, ... .. , 3 ,.., a ci czi 0 „ ......, _„_.„ ,.., 4., to (...) (4 (1) ,... -...., _ (,) c4 • NMI g -F-+ ' "" ,-. 0 . ,-. 0 . ., . 1-) Z 0 ..) C.) ;-' G ,-, 0 *5 6 c 0 •,_,- -o ,-.. • ra n 0 ,....- 4,- ra 0 0 0 rt a 8 0 N „., 0? -c, . 0 to 0 tiD 0 , a., : 4-4 • MN o CCS = CI) +.) (/) V C11 (ID :: co = td ad -5 0 c.., 0 "0 $-. 5 et 0 crl "0 P4 pmeno v> O 0 • -... ii '41 v) r'2 s-, v) 0 s:a 0 sa, • — a.) "( o 0 0 N 0 N -0 H 0 LL, 1 ' U ctt 0 0 0 — 0 0 (ID , Tu' v as as — . _ 0 r , 0 cu I.) cci ,-.. Er) c) o) ......_ c\i C) C) 1— 00 N N N >, in ,--, ...„.„ a) in - o CD C..) ca. D CZ .- C..., 4, • .--, . 7z . - , c.) I q.) 4-, „,,:-. -4 z • cz) 2 i 0 C:= 0 cn a • 'NI --, .,, ;,;• __ ,..., A E - .).0 ,-. L (....) E.,/, -C) ,v • - a, ,., t...-. 0. mo• 4-4 4-4 ■-.. ;110 0 0-1 til (/) 0 4-) aJ ' 1) a, O G'474 •,..., 0 C,...) Ct 01 bk CI . !moo 0 E ti) Ali ccl 0 W44) 0 •-._. co 1 0 a .444+ 0 O ••• cu 1 .4 •••-_, 0 -4••■ c) z o • pso •4•••+ = CI "„...... C.:, 0 .. = 6 c.J • no C L 1:3 L cu a. -4-, o o ct E 0., ...., ci4 a E ,3 E c..) C...) = 0 c j ..... c,..) t41) g:4 0 0 c+. -0 g 0 -0 N , CI? g (71 > -c...) g 0 0 C.) g • g g 0 "0 CU cd -)-_: ,1 aL 0 4- N cct : CID a.) 0 g 0 C. cct F2' g = ci) .1...• 0 c.) -.0 0 z -0 • 0 N I CO r7'. 4.-■ "t:i a) (f) a.) : Q 0 g , Mt i-■ P.■ CI 0 4.4 O j 1 . ,_q •■• g a) C:4 Pool ;.• PI Pio ,--4 cd c) C..) r. v) 4-1 • * .2 - 5 cr) ) c2) _ a) -eg (I) I a) > 0 ;-■ - 5 E 4 ,..,- to E 0,..) 0 •R '46.71 ' 4,. •,_4 O 7.; 8- - • .. ›. _ ,, -, _ <5 V, 71"..) ") a 6 2 .1., r q > 0 a ca > ,4 Q, .•, ai (:21 HL) .- 4 7) 47,' . . --■ NI ffi 4 tri \ 6 r.-: ,--. e ,i ri (*. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning er Development Service: AGENDA Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, August 4, 2005, at 7 :00 p.m. Council Chambers, College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 1. Call meeting to order. 2. Hear Citizens. At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address the Commission on planning and zoning issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The citizen presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.) All rrratters listed under Item 2, Consent Agenda, an considered routine by the Planning and Zoning Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. Ail items approved by Consent are apptrwed with any and all str recommendations. There will not be separate discussion of there items. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent .- genda it will be moved to the Regular Agenda Jo r frtrther consideration. 3. Consent Agenda. 3.1 Discussion and possible action on: Minutes — July 21, 2005, Workshop fleeting Minutes — July 21, 2005, Regular fleeting 3.2 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for Casdegate Subdivision Section 6 consisting of 23 lots on 11.142 acres, generally located on Green's Prairie Road west of Donnington Drive. Case #05 - 122 (JR/CC) 3.3 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for Phase 1 of fleadowcreek Subdivision, consisting of 90 lots on 20.919 acres, generally located on the south side of Koppe Bridge Road just west of the Wellborn Community in the City's ET]. Case #05 -10 (JR /CC) Regular Agenda. 4. Consideration, discussion and possible action on request(s) for absence from meetings. Ken Reynolds — July 22, 2005, Joint Meeting w /College Station & Bryan P &Z Harold Strong — August 4, 2005, Meeting 5. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. 6. Public hearing, presentation, discussion and possible action to consider a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to incorporate a Water and Wastewater (\V /WW) Master Plan Update into Section 6 of the College Station Comprehensive Plan. Case #05 - 127 (ST /TF) 7. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Replat for Indian Lakes Phase 6 consisting of 8 residential lots and an HOA common area on 18.111 acres located at the southern end of Chaco Canyon Drive in the City's EIJ. Case #05 - 119 (MH /AG) 8. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat that includes a Replat of The Glade Section 12, consisting of 15 lots on 3.03 acres, generally located on the north side of Southwest Parkway between Glade Street and Laura Lane. Case #05 - 121 (JP /JN) 9. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Rezoning for 9.68 acres out of the (.F?. Scott League located at 400 Harvey Mitchell Parkway South from C -1, General Commercial to C -2, Commercial- Industrial. Case #05 - 123 (TF) 10. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a rezoning for a 4.7 -acre tract from A -P, Administrative- Professional to R -4, Multi- family generally located at 1000 Spring Loop. Case #05 - 107 (TF) 12. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Replat of Lot 2, Block 1 of the Liberty Subdivision, consisting of 3 lots on 7.703 acres, located at the southwest corner of the intersection of State Highway 6 and Southwest Parkway. Case #05 - 112 (JP /CC) 13. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on the City Council June '05 Policy Retreat Report and the Key Result Area of Growth Management. (JD) 14. Adjourn Consultation with Attorney fGov't Code Section 551.071} ; possible action. The Planning and Zoning Commission may seek advice from its attorney regarding a pending and contemplated litigation subject or attorney - client privileged information. After executive session discussion, any final action or vote taken will be in public. If litigation or attorney - client privileged information issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, an executive session will be held. This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicapped parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call 979 - 764 -3517 or (TDD) 1- 800 - 735 -2989. Agendas posted on Internet Website http: / /www.cstx.00v and Cable Access Channel 19. Consent Agenda 3.1 Discussion and possible action on: Minutes — July 21, 2005, Workshop Meeting Minutes — July 21, 2005, Regular Meeting MINUTES Workshop Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, July 21, 2005, at 6:00 p.m. Administrative Conference Room , � College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning 6- Development Services COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman Scott Shafer, Commissioners Harold Strong, John Nichols., Dennis Christiansen, Marilyn Hooton and Ken Reynolds. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Commissioner Bill Davis. CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilman Happ. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF PRESENT: Staff Planners Lindsay Boyer, Molly Hitchcock, Senior Planner Trey Fletcher, Transportation Planner Ken Fogle, Graduate Civil Engineers Carol Cotter, Director Joey Dunn, Assistant Director Lance Simms and Staff Assistant Lisa Lindgren. OTHER CITY STAFF PRESENT: First Assistant City Attorney Roxanne Nemcik, Greenways Program Manager Kristan Weaver and Greenways Coordinator Intern Amber Davis. 1. Call to Order. Commissioner Shafer called the workshop meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. Commissioner Nichols asked for clarification regarding any changes for the Cove of Nantucket. Carol Cotter, Graduate Civil Engineer, stated that everything was the same and it was basically a final of the preliminary plat. Commissioner Christiansen asked if approval was obtained from Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) for access to Highway 6. Mrs. Cotter stated that the existing roadway will be used and that it will not be modified. She stated that there was not a TxDOT permit foinially filed, but preliminary approval was received from TxDOT when the plats were turned in. Commissioner Nichols asked if the Commission needed to make a motion on the Hike and Bike presentation or if it was just on the agenda for a presentation. P&Z Workshop Minutes July 21, 2005 Page 1 of 3 Ken Fogle, Transportation Planner, stated that the plan was to present this item to City Council in late August or early September, and that staff would like to have P &Z approval at that time. 3. Discussion of minor, amending and revised plats approved by Staff. 05 -91 Bald Prairie Subdivision (JP) 05 -98 Graham Corner Plaza (TF) Mrs. Cotter stated that Bald Prairie and Graham Corner Plaza were shifting lot lines. 4. Presentation, discussion, and possible action of the P &Z Plan of Work. Joey Dunn, Director, stated that this will be a standing item on the workshop agenda so that Commissioners can identify any changes or updates and that it will also give the opportunity for the Commission to talk about it should any questions arise. Chairman Shafer stated that he wanted information regarding a tree ordinance and fencing standards and whether those items would be in the subdivision regulations. Mr. Dunn stated that the fencing standards are in the current subdivision draft, but that he was unaware of any changes in the tree ordinance. 5. Presentation, discussion, and possible action of the draft Subdivision Regulations. Mark Smith was unable to attend the workshop meeting. Kristan Weaver, Greenways Program Manager, stated that Mark's plan for the meeting tonight was to talk about the Greenways draft of the Subdivision Regulations. Ms. Weaver gave a brief overview of the Greenways section in the Subdivision Regulations. Mr. Dunn stated that a tentative date for the meeting with the Parks and Recreation Board was scheduled for August 18, 2005, at 5:30 p.m. 6. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the P &Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: July 22, 2005, 11:00 a.m. - 1:00 p.m. - Joint Meeting of College Station and Bryan Planning & Zoning Commissions, at Bryan City Hall. Mr. Dunn reminded the Commissioners of the joint meeting between College Station and Bryan P &Z Commissions scheduled for July 22, 2005. A draft copy of the agenda was distributed and a brief overview was given. 7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. P &Z Workshop Minutes July 21, 2005 Page 2 of 3 Chairman Shafer stated that he would like to request additional information on a tree ordinance and asked that other cities be contacted regarding their current tree ordinances. Commissioner Nichols asked for additional information regarding fencing standards. 8. Adjourn Commissioner Nichols motioned to adjourn the workshop meeting. Commissioner Hooton seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). Approved: Scott Shafer, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Attest: Lisa Lindgren, Staff Assistant Planning and Development Services P&Z Workshop Minutes July 21, 2005 Page 3 of 3 MINUTES Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, July 21, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers, College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning & Development Services COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman Scott Shafer, Commissioners Harold Strong, John Nichols, Dennis Christiansen, Marilyn Hooton and Ken Reynolds. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Commissioner Bill Davis. CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilman Happ. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF PRESENT: Staff Planners Lindsay Boyer, Molly Hitchcock, Senior Planner Trey Fletcher, Transportation Planner Ken Fogle, Graduate Civil Engineers Carol Cotter, Director Joey Dunn, Assistant Director Lance Simms and Staff Assistant Lisa Lindgren. OTHER CITY STAFF PRESENT: First Assistant City Attorney Roxanne Nemcik, Action Center Representative Brian Cooke, Greenways Program Manager Kristan Weaver and Greenways Coordinator Intern Amber Davis. 1. Call to order. Chairman Shafer called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. 2. Hear Visitors. No visitors spoke. 3. Consent Agenda. 3.1 Discussion and possible action on: Minutes — July 7, 2005, Workshop Meeting Minutes — July 7, 2005, Regular Meeting P &Z Minutes Regular Agenda July 21, 2005 Page 1 of 3 3.2 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for the Cove of Nantucket Subdivision, consisting of 68 lots and 4 common areas on 17.81 acres, generally located along the west side of State Highway 6, south of the intersection of State Highway 6 and Nantucket Drive. Case #05 -108 (JP) Commissioner Nichols motioned to approve the consent agenda. Commissioner Christiansen seconded the motion, motion passed (6 -0). Regular Agenda. 6. Consideration, discussion and possible action on requests for absence from meetings. Marilyn Hooton — July 7, 2005, Meeting Bill Davis — July 21, 2005, Meeting Bill Davis — July 22, 2005, Joint Meeting w /Bryan P &Z Commissioner Reynolds motioned to approve the absence requests. Commissioners Nichols seconded the motion, motion passed (6 -0). 5. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. None. 6. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on the College Station Bike and Hike Task Force's Recommendations. (KF) Kristan Weaver, Greenways Program Manager presented the final recommendations made in April 2005 from the Bike and Hike task force. Ms. Weaver stated that if Planning and Zoning approved the items it would be presented to City Council at a future meeting. Commissioner Nichols motioned to approve and forward the final recommendations to City Council. Commissioner Hooton seconded the motion, motion passed (6 -0). 7. Presentation, discussion and possible action on a request to re- consider a rezoning within 180 days of denial for 4.7 acres generally located at 1000 Spring Loop from A -P, Administrative- Professional to R -4, Multi - family. Case #05 -107 (TF) Trey Fletcher, Senior Planner, presented the item. Mr. Fletcher stated that the reason for a rehearing of this item was the approval of the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan by the Commission and City Council. Greg Taggart, MDG, 2551 Texas Avenue South, College Station, Texas. Mr. Taggart stated that the applicant felt that there has been a significant changed condition since the Comprehensive Plan was amended. P&Z Minutes Regular Agenda July 21, 2005 Page 2 of 3 Commissioner Nichols motioned to approve the request for rezoning within the 180 day time period. Commissioner Christiansen seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). 8. Adjourn. Commissioner Reynolds motioned to adjourn. Commissioner Hooton seconded the motion, motion passed (6 -0). Approved: Scott Shafer, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Attest: Lisa Lindgren, Staff Assistant Planning and Development Services P &Z Minutes Regular Agenda July 21, 2005 Page 3 of 3 Consent Agenda 3.2 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat — for Castlegate Subdivision Section 6 consisting of 23 lots on 11.142 acres, generally located on Green's Prairie Road west of Donnington Drive. Case #05 -122 (JR/CC) STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Jennifer Reeves, Planner Report Date: July 19, 2005 Email: jreeves @cstx.gov Meeting Date: August 4, 2005 Item: Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat - for Castlegate Subdivision Section 6 consisting of 23 lots on 11.142 acres, generally located on Green's Prairie Road west of Donnington Drive in Castlegate Subdivision. Applicant: Wallace Phillips, Greens Prairie Investors, Ltd., Owner Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat as submitted. Item Summary: In accordance with the PDD zoning approved in April 2004 and the preliminary plat that was approved June of 2005, the applicant has submitted a Final Plat for Section 6 of Castlegate Subdivision that will allow for the development of 23 single family homes. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan designates the area as Single Family Residential Medium Density (3 -6 DU /acre). The Final Plat is in compliance with the Land Use Plan with a density of approximately 3 DU /acre. The Final Plat is also in compliance with the modified standards approved with the rezoning. The plat includes modifications to standard street widths, sidewalks, lot dimensions, and setbacks. Sections 6 will take access from Green's Prairie Road, which is designated as a minor arterial on the City's Thoroughfare Plan. An emergency access is planned from the Amberley Place cul -de -sac with the future development of Phase 7 of the subdivision. This subdivision is located in the Spring Creek Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Area 97 -01. Impact Fees will be due at time of final plat. Current fees for this area are $349.55 per Living Unit Equivalent (LUE). Item Background: This area was annexed into the city in 1995. Soon after that, the developer began discussions with the City for the Crowley Master Development Plan, of which this tract is a part. The Plan was originally approved by Council in 1997 and then modified in 1998. In 2000, Crowley teamed with Wallace Phillips to develop the approximately 350 -acre portion of the property on the west side of the future Hwy 40. The initial PDD rezoning request for 162 acres out of the 350 -acre, Castlegate Subdivision was quickly followed by a Master Preliminary Plat for the 350 -acre area. Related Advisory Board Recommendations: The Parks Board approved the plan for parkland dedication for Cast legate in 2000. Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Application 4. Copy of Final Plat / - Z LL n- / ./N 0 d / r ' S��A� // AiL:: 0 it �s ; N tn P/ 047.64,40rigaelf44 iti lik It 'W w4" 0 al do 0 " ' 41.. ,N, U 684, iripAtA 4 ..,./..: ....4,4„..,,k.a.,,,,,,, L' 14 , Ay,* ( W:# d. t � � CO NW* PAIII4 1 � A =� t\\*, w Pool- 2 ,, .41Scill0 A - _11 falb ion 4 N co 0 Ai ol t) „ o .T - i 0 tr Y CT 7 Il 7 Q. Nommorm "a O r WO i r �/ PoVra ..41/474f 4&- Iyyi W Aill: L.C-j ATVAPq 47 Air 4 V- E lao J t . ' ) ii W l** . � A W Ilre: �Ofa lsap 0 i z E a- r �� p FOR OFFICE USE N Y 9)/3 P &Z CASE NO.: �a (fr DATE SUBMITTED: ° l; .. STATION CITY C_ I COLLEGE 5 1.1) 1 .)r at Pl rtuti,,g c Development 5rrvice, FINAL PLAT APPLICATION (Check one) ❑ Minor ❑ Amending [I'` Final ❑ Vacating C Replat ($300.00) ($300.00) ($400.00) ($400.00) ($600.00)* 'Includes public hearing fee The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P&Z Commission consideration. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: y Filing Fee (see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets - $55.00 per additional sheet NI Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations -- $100 (if applicable) t,.! Development Permit Application Fee of $200.00 (if applicable). V Infrastructure Inspection Fee of $600.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed) ✓ Application completed in full. Copy of original deed restrictions /covenants for replats (if applicable). V Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.) ✓ One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and /or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable). V' Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. ✓ A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. ✓ Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable). -- Parkland Dedication req cement approved by the PTrks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of approval (if applicable). (1 ..f(4C� " Date of Preapplication �,-t Conference: MouAt -k Ca Zc:t a NAME OF SUBDIVISION �L tt:re SUibC .l Vt C Dv1 - Cp SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot & Block) kk,\V f cC C ft ytt I.}c alto 61- rt 4 koc.c4 APPLICANT /PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): Name tAt'- 4'14, r - f>tt (tip Street Address 4 C,qV-, pttt rrt v - < City Colki e S tL t U ✓� State 1 Zip Code 11L?Jf E -Mail Address Phone Number ( 0 Vto 12-St Fax Number (I7q) (/(U - 10 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name 61 P,Ir1 �l Yt1S`SC?t S /? �� Street Address l}- (O ('ac,- 1-(,Q.10 � i'Q- City _allele t e Sta fcrv"1 State 1 X Zip Code 11?)4 E -Mail Address — Phone Number 01 (0''O} -- 7 O Fax Number ( t ` (04 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name L ((0 \ --- j e t.i.,A Street Address i 101 6e ha 01 RDItel Cit Co(/ e; e State � '�, Zip Code -19)45 E -Mail Address joi 1,t �f J� � e - Qk�o el :VI ...� Phone Number " q -1 Fax Number (vet - -7 - i ri 6,13/03 1 i .1 • Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so, please provide the Volume and Page # Acreage — Total Property `- \ Z elC Total # Of Lots R -O -W Acreage 1, ✓i f Z cit Existing Use: \I a tit tc) Proposed Use: � vi ') t G t/I- L a'e cd e a ( Number Of Lots By Zoning District / ?V / / Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: Floodplain Acreage t A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and approved Master Plan and /or Preliminary Plat (if applicable): he, Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations & Reason For Same: ?Y P- tow v Requested Oversize Participation: `x,41 Total Linear Footage of Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: Proposed Public: ACREAGE: 12-' 5 Streets Sidewalks # of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee 2 5f1' Sanitary Sewer Lines # of acres in floodplain Water Lines # of acres in detention 2-11 Channels # of acres in greenways Storm Sewers OR Bike Lanes / Paths FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: # of Single - Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $ (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above - identified final plat and attests that this request does not amend any covenants or restrictions associated with this plat. ,,,, ,4 � Z4- ,A5 : —Z e >' ` � ' f � f / `c- Signature and Title �/ T Date ,a l� f. 6'13/03 Consent Agenda 3.3 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for Phase 1 of Meadowcreek Subdivision, consisting of 90 lots on 20.919 acres, generally located on the south side of Koppe Bridge Road just west of the Wellborn Community in the City's ETJ. Case #05 -10 (JR /CC) STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Jennifer Reeves, Staff Planner Report Date: July 14, 2005 Email: jreeves @cstx.gov Meeting Date: August 4, 2005 Item: Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for Phase 1 of Meadowcreek Subdivision, consisting of 90 lots on 20.919 acres, generally located on the south side of Koppe Bridge Road just west of the Wellborn Community in the City's ETJ. Applicant: Chris Menger, Agent for Main Street Homes -CS, LTD, Owner Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat as submitted. Item Summary: This property is located on Koppe Bridge Road just west of Wellborn Community. Phase 1 of Meadowcreek Subdivision consists of 90 Tots and is part of a proposed 338 lot development in the City's ETJ. All of the lots will be approximately 0.15 acres. Koppe Bridge Road is a Minor Collector on the City's Thoroughfare Plan. Additional right -of -way for Koppe Bridge Road is being dedicated this Plat. This Final Plat meets the minimum requirements for ETJ subdivisions. Water will be provided by Wellborn Special Utility District (SUD). A wastewater treatment plant has been permitted by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and will also be owned and operated Wellborn SUD. Street construction within the subdivision will be to City standards and will include curb and gutter. This allows for reduced lot width compared to the minimum requirement of 100 feet for a rural designed road. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The subject property is located in the (ETJ) Extra Territorial Jurisdiction. Item Background: December 2, 2004 the Commission unanimously approved the Preliminary Plat. Budgetary & Financial Summary: N/A Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Application 4. Copy Final Plat / / Ya ' Aviv A7- 7 4#4. 4ta arr / -, f-- ei 4 ______ ill: , ,,, , * .1 • / � z «— ,rit,4„,,, \ #* /! At `�"� r\No 4 mit 1 • mi ' ` l or` w c,_ * 41 VS, . \ 4 4 L-- . t - i t ## ' p it, • S 4 ° 41Y cp tri ■°4 0 40 .41 0 < : (5). o 444/It • / 4 ****.■■ 4■* s af 14, 1 4* , 4,8- •0411 wr■ s % 04,40 * k 11 Ilies ■ „ . # 16104 5*- ,as 1011r ♦ w 4 4r. . 41. .11P + #, 0 /Q w ■„, u vat *44. , :494.,41"T UJ 4.. O eil w • ♦ 1- 4 o r w r ► wl r o r Al lk , ___ c r ‘ V !' t , 1 * tit- CL IVED_ 1124/05 10 :13AM; - >512 478 5678; #862; PAGE 2 Jan 24 05 10:09a TEXCON ENGINEERING 9797647759 p.2 4. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY (.711 P &Z Case No.: 0 ID COLLECT. STATION Date Submitted: [ :,._.) FINAL PLAT APPLICATION — ETJ The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for Planning & Zoning Commission consideration. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ✓ [0 ' Final plat review and filing fee $400 NOTE: Multiple Sheets - $55 per additional sheet ✓ (' Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review prior to the Planning & Zoning Commission.) E One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and /or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable). 1/5 Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. ✓ L A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not - „ Q Three (3) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable). NAME OF SUBDIVISION 6001" 2 S 1�rr 1 _ -- SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot & Block) Sot;.:, crt tAfea R ,v-v oi, kC( 6045e Pd- APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary s CorItt for the Project): Name ki i .,/‘ _ ate. Z 4 I . vt E -Mail r,teiri5vinevney L Pr" cw•ens . cos* Street Address loo Could e Ave nue ��i.�- ��, 1-- - too City )hiAS i r' J State 'fl( Zip Code lb/0 1 Phone Number ( 't 2 ) 141 ebez 3 i Fax Number (51z-) 5(e) c PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name V\A &iA cVe C1x.wF. - 05 L 9 . E -Mail — Street Address 9'00 Co vIrl SS Al P Atke... t Su L— (Do _ City , vl A State TK Zip Code - 7 ?) Phone Number ( (Z} cl 1- � Fax Number (51 7t - S ?g ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name Joe SChu 1k� � P E- f e -xc D to E -Mail )oe5c t-LLd 1- C' - +€cce,n Street Address \ ("Y (t,. kOC LA City _Zak \fle cj'a ki \ State It Zip Code 11 -j Phone Number 01`1) *NA --1143 Fax Number (91ct') }- -175`7 1- Aug -02 1 of -I RECEIVED: 1/24/05 10 ;14AM; - >512 478 5678; #862; PAGE 3 Jan 24 05 10:09a TEXCON ENGINEERING 9797647759 p.3 oes Ivor l' Ar—i 0. NC tunes of R-0 Acreage Total Property 2 - Q . t1-t etc. Total # Of Lots ' O R -O -W Acreage � _7 } ac ty. Existing Use: vGLC &.0n} Proposed Use: . ( 4 �� � � P © Number Of Lots By Zoning District / Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: Lo T Floodplain Acreage 0 A Statement Addressing Any Differences Between The Final Plat And Approved Master Development Plan And /Or Preliminary Plat (If Applicable): r u�� to ► . + + 2- ' . u r. t ! _ • C 0 t ,a cm `1S 6 • - orS 2.3ti 2-4). Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations & Reason For Same: role_. Requested Oversize Participation: ytot Total Linear Footage of Proposed Public: 32-S1 , Streets 2-910 Sidewalks 2-S(A Sanitary Sewer Lines 3o6, Water Lines 4-903 Channels f3(3 Storm Sewers Bike Lanes / Paths NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above - identified final plat. 2. 4 - 0 c S gnat , r. and Title Date 1 - Aug -02 2 of 4 Regular Agenda 4 Consideration, discussion and possible action on request(s) for absence from meetings. Ken Reynolds — July 22, 2005, Joint Meeting w /College Station & Bryan P &Z Harold Strong — August 4, 2005, Meeting City of College Station Absence Request Form For Elected and Appointed Officers ) Name: C )/) () I ) c. )c) ki / 1 --) Request Submitted on: 7 4 - et.5 I will not be in attendance at the meeting of: )1J,A_Q) for the reason(s) specified: (Date) ---) -- ptit-ioi _ ivicttil (Signa e) , 7 , Li This request shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board one-week prior to meeting date. City of College Station Absence Request Form For Elected and Appointed Officers Natne: Pala( c 5tra Request Submitted on: 1 will not be in attendance at the meeting of: (ail for the reason(s) specified: ila-r,1215f (Signature) Regular Agenda 6 Public hearing, presentation, discussion and possible action to consider a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to incorporate a Water and Wastewater (W /WW) Master Plan Update into Section 6 of the College Station Comprehensive Plan. Case #05 -127 (ST /TF) STAFF REPORT Prepared by: Trey Fletcher, Sr. Planner Report Date: July 22, 2005 Email: tletcher@cstx.gov Meeting Date: August 4, 2005 ITEM: Public hearing, presentation, discussion and possible action to consider a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to incorporate a Water and Wastewater (W/WW) Master Plan Update into Section 6 of the College Station Comprehensive Plan. APPLICANT: City of College Station STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Master Plan Update as presented. ITEM SUMMARY: In collaboration with College Station Utilities, the Water and Wastewater Master Plan Map is being updated as part of Section 6 of the Comprehensive Plan. The Master Plan Maps function similarly to the Thoroughfare Plan with regard to implementation through Capitol Improvement Planning (CIP) and private development. The City may choose to construct the necessary infrastructure as a CIP project or the infrastructure may be required as part of a private development project. If the utility line shown on the Plan is of greater capacity than that needed for a specific development project, Oversize Participation (OP) may be requested by the developer in accordance with Section 9 of the Subdivision Regulations. The Master Plan Maps address future utility needs within the City and the City's utility CCNs, areas where the City has obtained the Certificate of Convenience and Necessity to provide a given utility. The respective maps are the result of numerous engineering studies performed for the City over the past 10 years. The utility line sizes are based on existing development, development trends and the comprehensive land use plan. Property owners requesting land use plan amendments and /or zoning map amendments (rezonings) will be required to assess the impact the amendment has with regard to the Master Plan Maps and propose changes as necessary. Likewise, when the City updates the Land Use Plan or initiates rezoning, the Plan will need to be re- evaluated and possibly amended. ITEM BACKGROUND: The Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1997. The Water and Wastewater System Plans chapter has not been amended since. The plans were prepared by CDM, as a consultant team member with HOK. BUDGETARY AND FINANCIAL SUMMARY: No immediate budgetary impacts are anticipated due to this item; however, the annual Oversize Participation line items may increase over time. RELATED BOARD ACTIONS: None required. RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN: • Core Services: We will provide infrastructure, with the capacity to meet current and projected needs. • Planning & Development Services: We will continue to promote a well - planned community. COMMISSION ACTION OPTIONS: The Commission Acts as a recommending body on the question this matter, which will be ultimately decided by City Council. The Commission options are: 1. Recommend approval of amendment as submitted; 2. Recommend denial; 3. Table; or, 4. Defer action to a specified date. SUPPORTING MATERIALS: 1. Existing Water and Wastewater Master Plan Maps 2. Proposed Water and Wastewater Master Plan Maps NOTIFICATION: Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle; 7-19-2005 and 8-5-2005 Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): August 4, 2005 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: August 23, 2005 Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners within 200': None required. Response Received: None, as of date of staff report. Regular Agenda 7 Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Replat for Indian Lakes Phase 6 consisting of 8 residential lots and an HOA common area on 18.111 acres located at the southern end of Chaco Canyon Drive in the City's ETJ. Case # 05 -119 (MH /AG) STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Molly Hitchcock Report Date: July 21, 2005 Email: mhitchcock ©cstx.gov Meeting Date: August 4, 2005 Item: Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Replat for Indian Lakes Phase 6 consisting of 8 residential lots and an HOA common area on 18.111 acres located at the southern end of Chaco Canyon Drive in the City's ETJ. Applicant: Travis Martinek, Agent for Smiling Mallard Development Company Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the replat. Item Summary: This replat doubles the number of residential Tots in Phase 6 from four lots to eight. The common areas are not being affected. Lots will go from 2.6 - 4.5 acres each to 1.2 — 2.7 acre with the replat. Lots 1 -R1 through 4- R1 will continue to show a Conservation Buffer, which is part of this project's efforts for meeting USACoE requirements. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The property is shown as Rural on the Land Use Plan. The subject area does not include any streets that are proposed on the Thoroughfare Plan. Commission Action Options: The Commission has final authority over the replat. The options regarding the replat are: • Approval with conditions; • Approval as submitted; or • Denial. Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Application 4. Copy of the Replat z J LL_ rn T"'" In U) N «7 U cfl CL H^10 e r + "* W tu NY 04 1 1 1 z i 1 Z z W W Z W 2 0_ 0 LLI p z Z DEVELOPMENT REVIEW INDIAN LAKES PH 6 FOR O FFICE USE ONLY PBZ CASE NO.: o5 ( DATE SUBMITTED: . I Y OF COLLEGE STATION Uvv �� 41 PlanningerDevelopmentServices t ��1 �... FINAL PLAT APPLICATION (Check one) ❑ Minor [1 Amending (1 Final n Vacating ® Re p lat ($300.00) ($300.00) ($400.00) ($400.00) ($600.00)* *Includes public hearing fee The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P &Z Commission consideration. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: X Filing Fee (see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets - $55.00 per additional sheet N/A Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations -- $100 (if applicable) N/A Development Permit Application Fee of $200.00 (if applicable). N/A Infrastructure Inspection Fee of $600.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed) X Application completed in full. X Copy of original deed restrictions /covenants for replats (if applicable). X Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.) N/A One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and /or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable). X Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. X A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. N/A Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable). N/A Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of approval (if applicable). Date of Preapplication Conference: Unknown NAME OF SUBDIVISION: Villages of Indian Lakes — Phase VI SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot & Block): End of Chaco Canyon Dr., Lots 1R— 8R, Block 13 APPLICANT /PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): Name: Travis Martinek Street Address: 3608 East 29 Street, Suite 100 City: Bryan State: Texas Zip Code: 77802 E -Mail Address: travis @clarkewyndham.com Phone Number: (979) 846 -4384 Fax Number: (979) 846 -1461 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name: Smiling Mallard Development, LLC Street Address: 3608 East 29th Street, Suite 100 City: Bryan State: Texas Zip Code: 77802 E -Mail Address: travis @clarkewyndham.com Phone Number: (979) 846 -4384 Fax Number: (979) 846 -1461 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name: McClure & Browne, Inc. Street Address: 1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103 City: College Station State: Texas Zip Code: 77845 E -Mail Address: mikem @mcclurebrowne.com Phone Number: (979) 693 -3838 Fax Number: (979) 693 -2554 6/13/03 1 of 1 Is there a temporary blanket ease vent on this property? No Acreage — Total Property: 17.35 Total # Of Lots: 8 R - - Acreage: 0.92 Existing Use: Single- Family Residential Proposed Use: Single- Family Residential umber Of Lots By Zoning District: NIA Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: N/A Floodplain Acreage: NIA A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and approved Master Plan and /or Preliminary Plat (if applicable): N/A Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations & Reason For Same: N/A Requested Oversize Participation: N/A Total Linear Footage of Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: Proposed Public: ACREAGE: Streets Sidewalks # of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee Sanitary Sewer Lines # of acres in floodplain Water Lines # of acres in detention Channels # of acres in greenways Storm Sewers OR Bike Lanes / Paths FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: # of Single - Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $ (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above - identified final plat and attests that this request does not amend any covenants or restrictions associated with this plat. .7/ / /C25 Travis Martinek Date Design & Construction Manager 6/13/03 2 of 2 Regular Agenda 8 Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat that includes a Replat of The Glade Section 12, consisting of 15 lots on 3.03 acres, generally located on the north side of Southwest Parkway between Glade Street and Laura Lane. Case #05 -121 (JP /JN) STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Jennifer Prochazka, Planner Report Date: July 22, 2005 Email: jprochazka @cstx.gov Meeting Date: August 4, 2005 Item: Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat that includes a Replat of The Glade Section 12, consisting of 15 lots on 3.03 acres, generally located on the north side of Southwest Parkway between Glade Street and Laura Lane. Applicant: Fred Bayliss, Agent for Owner 7B Investments. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat as submitted. Item Summary: This item is for a Final Plat that consists of 15 lots on 3.03 acres. The property is zoned R -1 Single Family Residential. The plat is in preparation of a single family infill development. The property is surrounded by developed single family to the west, north, and east, and Southwest Parkway to the south. This plat proposes a 5 foot right -of- way dedication on Southwest Parkway. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The property is shown on the Land Use Plan as Single Family Medium Density (3 -6 dwelling units / acre) and the plat is in compliance with the plan (4.9 dwelling units / acre). The subdivision will access Southwest Parkway, which is a minor arterial on the Thoroughfare Plan. The proposed plat is in compliance with the approved Preliminary Plat and the Subdivision Regulations. Item Background: The subject property was annexed into the city in 1968 and has always been zoned for single family development. A preliminary plat, which proposed 17 lots in a similar configuration, was denied for this property in early 2004. A Preliminary Plat showing the same configuration proposed with this Final Plat was approved earlier this year. Budgetary & Financial Summary: NA Related Advisory Board Recommendations: On February 8, 2005, the Parks Board agreed to a cash dedication in lieu of land for the proposed plat. Commission Action Options: The Commission has final authority over the Final Plat and Replat. The Commission's options are: • Approval • Denial Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Application 4. Copy of Final Plat & Replat NOTIFICATION: Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle; 7-19-05 Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 8-4-05 Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': 22 Response Received: I have received several inquiry phone calls and several calls in opposition. The concerns related to the current traffic congestion on Southwest Parkway, the potential for student housing and aesthetics of the potential development. One area resident commented that she would like to see the existing wall along the property remain in place. / l vJ r 1 U.h Q- - . T / i T / C / N o ,/ i — / LL a- / ' / � � �\ 0 A. / p`''' // �\ \ co „,c / �i / ,4)._ / y �/ �� f O \/ TP , � / \\ v \ \ / T OC) / Q \ cis ' 7 co N � / � `� � � ; co �� A 0 , 4 T / / \ '\ / \ -1- � A \ i A / / M \/ T f C 1) T \ \ CO \ Lo `y \ N N.-- y �` LO N \_ ` T � Q`, ,; — �� "WA � 1 /?��� \ ca Ny/ \ \ \ ”, U / ��� / / ` / c = ' V / j V o 0 / \ \ (. / M / cS7 } 00 - ' 1 &, , \ T 7 ` � N / \., IN: 740,,.., Q5 v co A % o I a° � N � F ,l``�, t / \ 1 / p er \ �N ?" \ C /' - / ..�-- N . (N C ) y j \ 0. !V - Z -- ' - ---4/ /, '''' ''.. q ?: N/ \ N. (I LoN\-\,", //-\\co \--/ //, w /53,_,,,, � / r T / ' I t N \ T A :\,,, ` 7 (r) w J �� t3.) o \� \ T %� / � � � T � � T O / / i N �, / /�\ \ / \ �\ �.� CO / / T T / CO N VT � \� / // C T. / \\ / T T z T / / W >, III CO / / / Ct _� \ 1.- / CO T �� W ) a N" CO T j / / a. 0 / Q 00 V / ' -J / 0 / \ N / Y / W / \ LC) . / T Lr � / r- / w / 0 T \ c j , /, . N / to .7.: � / / / N t., u7 0 c5" d' �Q a ) / • d �, T ti / S > _ c � / / _ .,„*" FOR OFF�� t�,S�o� P&Z CASE NO.: %J� 7I DATE SUBMITTED:_ CITY O1 COLLEGE. STNI Pl imung c) /) /opnnrut Srr ph <, FINAL PLAT APPLICATION (Check one) ❑ Minor ❑ Amending ❑ Final ❑ Vacating 'Replat ($300.00) ($300.00) ($400.00) ($400.00) ($600.00)' *Includes public hearing fee The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P &Z Commission consideration. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: i /Filing Fee (see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets - $55.00 per additional sheet N A Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations $100 (if applicable) v' Development Permit Application Fee of $200.00 (if applicable). • 1/' Infrastructure Inspection Fee of $600.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed) t,/ Application completed in full. 14)f Copy of original deed restrictions /covenants for replats (if applicable). ✓ Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.) v' One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and /or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable). ✓'Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. L Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable). . Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of approval (if applicable). F.Prtt.etrut, ' CO . Date of Preapplication . :1;, -,.,a. 24 'Lops; NAME OF SUBDIVISION — Ile ac -le, vwi t2- v t�ciC SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot& Block) TVA i A ) - II/X. (.51(acie, (z_. APPLICANT /PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): Name fr- ,-\ c L Street Address 1'3OS i<j-t VtACt City prieurt State Tx Zip Code 1I E -Mail Address Phone Number ci'— T — 1 31 S Fax Number ` '7e/ -- TN- CSL 7 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name 1 j aa/ll(t'S4tflf'r - CFS L - r t Street Address t'7oS (,�)e City 13,1,1 c � ;n State T)( Zip Code 7 ( E -Mail Address Phone Number c� `�� l-- /79 Fax Number e 11 � 1-� 1- n- ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name 1:4725(z, on - : 'f' +x � .2> P. E. Street Address 11 o1 a��te; W1 rZQ Cit Cotte fie Ste ov1 State Tx, Zip Code 11 E -Mail Address J() c- 4 .C..Lu.J 4 : e - k(O?l Phone Number - '7(,4 r x"7 3 Fax Number e rr -7(„4- -775 6/1103 NO Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so, please provide the Volume _ and Page # — Acreage - Total Property , o3 (IL , Total # Of Lots IS R -O -W Acreage 0. S&, ct . Existing Use: \I . \- Proposed Use: `3iil1a - Gum; ti re AsAird- J.I Number Of Lots By Zoning District i') / R- 1 / / Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: O, Up / 12-'H / / / Floodplain Acreage 0 A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and approved Master Plan and /or Preliminary Plat (if applicable): t( ct Ka t °eVt � _ea. e WI e. r ' vvt p -Ovv, 6c-wt. . t i L 0 IL 7 13 +0 hit - cepI t,ni S 1 ki 1 C, Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations & Reason For Same: 1 ones Requested Oversize Participation: (\.f 0v`ti , Total Linear Footage of Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: Proposed Public: ACREAGE: 3 75 ' Streets — Sidewalks # of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee 3� Z Sanitary Sewer Lines # of acres in floodplain ' �7 Water Lines # of acres in detention °' Channels # of acres in greenways 15S Storm Sewers OR Bike Lanes / Paths FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: c << I S # of Single- Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $ 2- /i?i 2430 (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above - identified final plaj~ and attests that this reque does not amend any covenants or restrictions associated with this plat. y6 L /' �� f � CCVC Sit ature and Ti 'r - ! ;,-,? Date 6 13/03 Regular Agenda 9 Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Rezoning for 9.68 acres out of the J.E. Scott League located at 400 Harvey Mitchell Parkway South from C -1, General Commercial to C -2, Commercial - Industrial. Case #05 -123 (TF) STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Trey Fletcher, Sr. Planner Report Date: July 25, 2005 Email: tletcher@cstx.gov Meeting Date: August 4, 2005 Item: Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Rezoning for 9.68 acres out of the J.E. Scott League located at 400 Harvey Mitchell Parkway South from C -1, General Commercial to C -2, Commercial - Industrial. Applicant: Southcorp Holdings I, L.P. owner and agent for Por Nada Joint Venture, owner Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning. Item Summary: The applicant is requesting most of the parcel from C -1 to C -2 in order to develop light industrial and office uses. The remaining area would stay C -1.The property to the west is zoned A -O, Agricultural Open and is owned by Texas A &M University. Properties to the north are zoned C -1, General Commercial. Across FM 2818 and FM 60 is land owned by TAMU, and is zoned R -1 and C -U, respectively. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan shows this area as Regional Retail. Regional Retail is defined in the Comprehensive Plan as "areas permitting regional -scale development of tax generating developments such as retail centers, service commercial, restaurants, etc. These uses are generally dependent on good access to highways and major arterials." The F &B Small Area Plan (2003) evaluated this area generally between FM 2818 and Turkey Creek Road, north of FM 60. The land use portion of this plan acknowledged this notion and provided additional thoroughfare access to the interior of the area (see Infrastructure & Facilities comments), and suggested that Regional Retail while still appropriate in this location should also accommodate C -2 and Tight industrial uses. Consideration for this was based on several factors, including: • Limited access from FM 2818 • Limited visibility due to the grade separation and elevated speed limits • Beneficial proximity to Easterwood Airport, Research Park, and truck routes Due to the proximity to Easterwood Airport, an Avigation and Clear Zone Easement exists at the southernmost portion of the parcel. In this area, land uses and height are restricted. According to the Easterwood Airport Master Plan: P: \GROUP\Development Services \Planning & Zoning CommissionlLegal Review 2005\August 41Valley Park rezoning 05- 123. DOC Created on 7/27/2005 4:54 PM "The airport's 65 DNL contour, within the approach to Runway 16, extends off of airport property northward across FM 60 and FM 2818 encompassing mostly Texas A &M property. However, the noise contour also encompasses land between FM 2818 and Turkey Creek Road north of FM 60. A review of aerial photographs reveals that most of the land inside the 65 DNL noise contour west of FM 2818 is vacant, although a few residences and one business front along the service road on the north side of FM 60. Land use in this area is shown on the City of College Station's Land Use Plan as Industrial along FM 60 and Retail Regional along FM 2818. The city's zoning for this area consists of Agricultural -Open, Planned Industrial, and General Commercial. All of these zonings are compatible with noise levels of 65 DNL." Much of the area to the west remains in the College Station Extra- territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) and is surrounded by the City of College Station and City of Bryan to the north. Item Background: Annexed: 1970 Rezoned: No data Platted: Two tracts (2.0 -acre and 9.63 acres); a preliminary plat application incorporating both has been filed (05 - 129) Development activity in the vicinity: Approximately 7.5 acres along F &B Road were annexed by petition in 2004. The tract was rezoned from A -O to C -1, in 2004. A preliminary plat has been approved for the same area. A mini - storage warehouse was proposed on a portion of the property. Related Advisory Board Recommendations: N/A Commission Action Options: The Commission acts as a recommending body on the question of rezoning, which will be ultimately decided by City Council. The Commission options are: 1. Recommend approval of rezoning as submitted; 2. Recommend denial; 3. Table indefinitely; or, 4. Defer action to a specified date. Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Application 4. Infrastructure and Facilities P :!GROUP \Development Services\Planning & Zoning Commission1Legal Review 20051August 41Valley Park rezoning 05- 123.DOC Created on 7/27/2005 4 :54 PM / //' C� Z 7 / Z / 0 f cv r i I i V` Ce / . cu �+ 00 0 e10 // U.._ • / . • / • . • 7 .. ....0 /• / " " i 0 N I # \ I / 0 \ C I- \ - 1 a E , _1 A‘ 0 i'') / • d '/ / / • / • ,,, / a ' J I A ll‘ 0 L ji l ■ / I- o -r I < � Q j o, o •`' N / J ■ .rte. W t W cc 1— Z W a. � `') [ O . , , J -1 W lA W <P z CoN \. rE,- FO OF I E SSEE ONLY CASE NO. t 1 Gri fir44111 DATE SUBMITTED 1 4 0 ITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning e'•r Development Services � � ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING) APPLICATION MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shall not be filed within a period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with permission of the Planning & Zoning Commission or City Council. The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for consideration: Application completed in full. V $500.00 application fee - Two (2) copies of a fully dimensioned map on 24" x 36" paper showing: a. Land affected; ✓ b. Legal description area of proposed change;' c. Present zoning; d. Zoning classification of all abutting land; and ✓ e. All public and private rights -of -way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land.- L-Written legal description of subject property (metes & bounds or lot & block of subdivision, whichever is applicable). t- The Rezoning Supporting Information sheet completed in full. A CAD (dxf /dwg) or GIS (shp) digital file may be required for more complex rezoning requests. Date of Required Preapplication Conference: 'PLICANT'S INFORMATION: `� Name 6c :), ncore �t c:\,.,'nq s ( {), Street Address 3A4 i kr t`�a - �Ja 5 `r t Z 00 City klroJSVD State -- c - X' Zip Code 77 019 E -Mail Address 6 h:1 \m0.e) p 30,, k oc - 1A - 1 , corn Phone Number (7 3j 6n- ( a?70 Fax Number ( 7 +`13SS- 42 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name j a-wl Street Address City State Zip Code E -Mail Address Phone Number Fax Number This property was conveyed to owner by deed dated Al R 2,00Z_ and recorded in Volume 4 8) , Page 2t S of the Brazos County Deed Records. General Location of Property: N')(- rrc► 1-e1$ on 1 t 7 Eck Address of Property: 2 400 .ta-r4 ,f n, („et\ 50.) 41 Legal Description: 2 FkG L-eo ut, ) s l - S Cell.e S�� )t , l�c6. C Acreage - Total Property: 2- A-crv5 fisting Zoning: c - Proposed Zoning: Present Use of Property: J o-cac Proposed Use of Property: L iiNA- In ,A4 C o. } rtt i ■ns , 0 C, te. 6/13/03 Page 1 of 2 :._ZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATIL1 1.) List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. 2.) Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. "" t� .) List any other reasons to support this zone change. The applicant has prepared this application and supporting information and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correct. IF APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A POWER OF ATTORNEY STATEMENT FROM THE OWNER. 6 ,, tin e c.c-? 1 U :15 Signature of owner (or agent) or applicant ate G 2 , n -ti o.� \ cnt r' 6/13/03 Page 2 of 2 INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES Water: An 18" water line is available for extension from the intersection of F&B Road and FM 2818. Sewer: No municipal sewer exists in the area. This utility is being made available through an existing Inter-local Agreement (ILA) with Texas A&M University. Streets: The parcels have frontage along Harvey Mitchell Parkway South (FM 2818) which is shown as a Freeway on the Thoroughfare Plan. There is no frontage road. A future Minor Collector is shown along the western property line to extend from the FM 60 Frontage Road and back to Turkey Creek Road. This planned facility will be incorporated into the development. Currently, a Minor Collector is a 60-foot right-of-way. The new Bryan-College Station Design Guidelines propose increasing this requirement to 70 feet. Off-site Easements: None are required at this time. Drainage: Surface drainage to TxDOT right-of-way to the south and east. Flood Plain: None, shown as Flood Zone X. Oversize request: None requested at this time. NOTIFICATION: Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle; 7-19-2005 and 8-7-2005 Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): August 4, 2005 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: August 23, 2005 Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners within 200': 8 Response Received: None, as of date of staff report. PAGROUPIDevelopment Services\ Planning & Zoning Commission\Legal Review 2005kAugust 411/a Iley Park rezoning 05- 123.DOC Created on 7/27/2005 4:54 PM Regular Agenda 10 Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a rezoning for a 4.7 -acre tract from A -P, Administrative- Professional to R -4, Multi - family generally located at 1000 Spring Loop. Case # 05 -107 (TF) STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Trey Fletcher, Sr. Planner Report Date: July 22, 2005 Email: tfletcher©cstx.gov Meeting Date: August 4, 2005 Item: Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a rezoning for a 4.7 -acre tract from A -P, Administrative - Professional to R -4, Multi- family generally located at 1000 Spring Loop. Applicant: Greg Taggart, Municipal Design Group (MDG), agent for River Ridge Townhomes, Ltd., owner Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning with the condition that access is exclusively via Spring Loop. Item Summary: This request was previously denied by City Council on March 22nd. A request to rehear the request within 180 days was approved by the Planning & Zoning Commission on July 21 following a Comprehensive Plan Amendment that was approved the City Council on July 14, 2004. This rezoning request is to allow for the development of a multi - family residential project. The requested R -4 zone allows a maximum of 20 dwelling units per acre. A number of easements affect this property, including access easements to commercial uses along University Drive. Due to the difference in land uses, these easements should be removed and all access should be via Spring Loop. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: This request is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan as amended by the City Council on July 14 The and use plan now reflects the parcel and all surrounding properties with access to Spring Loop, as Residential Attached with a density of 10 -20 dwelling units per acre. The Thoroughfare Plan shows Spring Loop as a Major Collector (70' ROW). No additional right -of -way is necessary. Analysis performed by staff in support of the recently approved Comprehensive Plan Amendment revealed that this facility could reasonably accommodate the additional traffic that would be generated as a result of the proposed land use. Item Background: Annexed: In 1956 and a small portion (northeast corner) in 1971. Rezoned: In 1992, Ordinance No. 1957 rezoned property from A -P, Administrative- Professional to C -B, Commercial- Business with the condition that a final plat be filed that combined the subject properties into one lot. No such plat was ever filed and the zoning change never took effect. In 2003, under the UDO the C -B districts were combined with C -1, General Commercial. In February 2004, a rezoning request from A -P to R -4, was denied. P:IGROUP1Development ServiceslPlanning & Zoning Commission\Legal Review 20051August 41Spring Loop rezoning again.DOC Created on 7/22/2005 9:16 AM Platted: This area is platted as Lots 4 -9, Block U of University Park Section 11 (1981). A replat application has been filed to consolidate the lots and access to Spring Loop. Recent actions: The subject parcel remains undeveloped. Comprehensive Plan Amendment from SF Residential High and Regional Retail to Residential Attached was approved by City Council on July 14. 2005. Development activity in the vicinity: Although this parcel has no frontage on to University Drive, a number of undeveloped tracts in the vicinity with frontage on University Drive have developed recently. Others are currently under development. Development has included restaurants, hotels, retail and office uses in addition to the proposed residential infill in conjunction with this request. Multi- family Issues: The Comprehensive Plan proposes 1092.6 acres of Residential Attached in specific locations. As of July 2005, there were 1,328 acres zoned multi - family, R -4 or R -6. o 858 total acres developed as multi - family o 785.5 acres developed as apartments & condominiums and o 72.5 acres developed as group housing (off campus dorms) o 175 acres zoned multi - family, but undeveloped. However, these are not necessarily in areas where we desire multi - family growth. o Approximately 175 acres zoned multi - family, but developed as other uses. o There is approximately 39 acres (in various locations) currently zoned for multi - family, but undeveloped, within one mile of Texas A &M University campus. Bryan - College Station Apartment Statistics 2004 Bryan/ 1 Texas College Metro Station 1 Average Average occupancy (percent) 90.6 [ 91.5 Average occupancy for units built since 2000 95.1 92.4 (percent) i Source: Real Estate Center / Apartment MarketData Research A certain level of vacancy is generally needed for ease of movement, housing choice, and affordability. Sources: Real Estate Center City of College Station Geographic Information System (GIS) P:IGROUPIDevelopment ServiceslPlanning & Zoning Commission\Legal Review 2005VAugust 4VSpring Loop rezoning again. DOC Created on 7/22/2005 9:16 AM Related Advisory Board Recommendations: A multi-family development will require review by the Parks Board based on the number of dwelling units. A determination by the Board of land dedication or fee in lieu should be rendered prior to the re-platting of the property. Commission Action Options: The Commission acts as a recommending body on the question of rezoning, which will be ultimately decided by City Council. The Commission options are: 1. Recommend approval of rezoning as submitted; 2. Recommend denial; 3. Table indefinitely; or, 4. Defer action to a specified date. Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Application 4. Infrastructure and Facilities P:tGROUP\Development ServicestPlanning & Zoning Commission legal Review 2005IAugust 41Spring Loop rezoning again. DOC Created on 7/22/2005 9: 1 6 AM . 11 .. \ \ // q.,.. co Pr'4116 . v.- °. d2 ( 44 ) I-- Rifit to '• ,,,- to e ...... ...... 7 iii _ / o c,-) (:)..• 0 N • Z I . e :- c - . , b .. N 9 / 1 ' , , 4 it .9r • ,-- .. 4164 cj 11 G. e 1-- cf, Veiol„ • • e--• q' E . N K. ce) El? 1 N Z 0 N (0 0") A * ,-- , , • P\ _•.1 ( 1.• ■: '' • c l., / • • • • • ,..., .• el:* 4 411V 9> At.- ,—• ,,,,... , : : : : Try \ • V." •• 4 '\ • 1 °3 ''' ,.. 7 , - ... .... i p . . e , ... , ....... \I. • 0 ,: a — S 1,- ..vos .... CV ,„,..■/ ,r - 4 v- ill cA, \ ) ;4 . in 0 '41 cli ,... 0) "st • 4 11 '•■■il 4 cr R a) CNI * ....• ts- 4-4 6 CV C \ 4 CV . . ,.... _ . # co Nc,... COO 0 __ .,- to 0 015 . trie (1, . i,.... ziasZ\ 4, `• ,,/ cs) . .....::- .. 0, .. "1)- (-V ,•\AO \A-1-9114 o O .--( 1055 OD 1 Cr) s- _ 16 N, ,, .r!•• AO COO ,14 •* c‘j 't „ -1 , 7 ,4) to N- \ ,--- , 414 ce) '4"--ictt C..c.., k.4-1 V/N 4 ii to Al - , - - _.------- ... ,r :... ...... T .... y r" '''',‘ 403 , cris e, Nlx •-• 77,- v \c2 c‘i I ' ' ' 1• 40 • • ''•• cr co \ • • • • • .0 0 .(f), _ 0 0 L i ,1: , \ *.;--- I'. '5 \ 40 ' °9 \ C41 C.:r) 1111 0 4 05 - 0_ ---:•:-.": ..':;:',':. . ..-,‹. =KJ 0 — 0 lin co , ,-- 406 ‘0\ •': 1, r 0 - ''' 0 * ■ .0 `-' • < S. . . . . .;ZI. : . .. , ' • ........ i 0 y. .! 0 .--j \----4 ■ '------ It CO JIM • ' 402 ,o 42) o --- o •4. d) .,. ...- .• • : :V cr c 4 -lorn 1 e\-- • • CL I op s.. Nr c) 0 tr . 04 • AO .-•-• • op . E C/) , ' c§;' 0 C A-- • C CD 0 co 0 c) • ..,.•• '''' 0 0c3 ''' 0.. , c „ 0 , .,,-- c, eC 0 .61 , 11 .c..) - a , to 0 .,--.-u... a .P'111 0 , •,-- a \ CV 0 : a) If_ co Q: • : : : .... \ , - Z..... . . . . " • • . . . . , 4 , Is . . . 0 • " ' . . . . . . . . . . . ..... o . 1.-1.4111111.' e„) i , c Ilrh f. • • • . . • 0' (..) .... Cr) $•:' C) (S) b. 44i' of a> 1. cc) E .... 7c3 Il Aik' ,s'agnt 7- TP- " .••.g 0 N 2 > 2t cv ' ' 0 Wil --t <-• , --IN ,.- 9'1 112§ 0 is c) CO ,-- 0 s• 0 0 0 Z; .. N y o .„-- .. CO M N 11.1 cv c y- ) * Ct 7 CL 0) \ \, > .0.1 • 111 1 ,- c) ch 2 _1 c:, (.5 0") r .) .....3 •••to 1— 5 CD Z 44-r. EX : Z C) D .., (.9 ‘ a. .7 C r-- L.1.1 V 05 < CL Y CD MU 0 4. # co 0 0 0 _1 0 ° -J ".-. °OM 04 co CO U.I > 1.Q■`' (0 9) U.J .4. 0 c\I 11". • co w > ,- " • Cc) co. 0 I 0 > ....) co co f i , 0 z _ •• __-0 ,,T * . 0 0 . . . . . , < 0 ....1 0 0 L. ..., , co ,....1. , • co „ti, 4 GrAi 1441 FOR O FI USE ON L} CASE NO " -' f i DATE SUBMITTED 41 6' ! /-C 5 Cr ry Ot= COLLEGE STATION PLnmi g e? I» elopmeat,Serviit. ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING) FOR PDD / P -MUD CI PDD ❑ P -MUD MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shall not be filed within a period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with permission of the Planning & Zoning Commission or City_council. The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for consideration: Application completed in full. $500.00 application fee. ✓ ✓ Two (2) copies of a fully dimensioned map on 24" x 36" paper showing: a. Land affected; b. Legal description of area of proposed change; c. Present zoning; d. Zoning classification of all abutting land; and e. All public and private rights -of -way and easem ents bounding and intersecting subject land. ✓ Written legal description of subject property (metes & bounds or lot & block of subdivision, whichever is applicable). The attached Rezoning Supporting Information sheet completed in full. Date of Required Preapplication Conference: r• (Ps' APPLICANT'S s �'S INFORMATION: Name(s) Te7 ae6 7 d Street Address 0 2 . C . 5 1 ' 7-I' �C�� AV -P.-. � City ie S�` State Zip Code - 7 - 78 1 4 - 0 E -Mail Address l4tci CS`�)C GLt O0. C6-144, Phone Number :O 6 " --s 1 1 Fax Number( J �p j 4,2 5 PROPERTY O ER'S INFORMATION: / O k Name(s) �;� (Licit M C IStt 1�1.4tr'S L �� Z� /�f / - , V"L 0 s Street Address 4 (o o 'l-A tl* . City r ,+e�e We ti , State T f Zip Code 7 7 �� ' E -Mail Address aJ+ov C: vc- i to . cenAA. Phone Number Fax 6q-C> CIA" Fax Number (glen �f0- ~ c2S0¢ This property was conveyed to owner by deed, dated VCeig 1' and recorded in Volume Page of the Brazos County Deed Records. / General Location of Property: /dd 0 TrIPLO (..OD C S Address of Property: ' 1 1 Legal Description: LAS 4" l I �t- (..0 OV(U e--Vc j,T) Cec, 1411q Total Acreage: 4.770. Z.0 re .r y Existing Zoning: 4 —F Requested Zoning: 1 Q17 Present Use of Property: U "� ��1,, 1,��-�,}"I- Proposed Use of Property: �-p�1C aka.cktt 6!13103 Page 1 of 2 REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION 1.) Lis t the changed or cbangin conditi ons in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. / { k �E' - et,�,'TL ✓ t C e .'- e " /2v114:1 L y p L ct. 1 tit.. 0 �t ✓ P a ( S atv - A u *c Ov- (&� -h ,t. o c < -- 4e./e.9ty Lit) . e - �..�. - it, -cX L.c it 6- E �-- 7-6 tA. . 2.) Indicate whether or not this zone range is in acaiordancF with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is, incorrect. 4' ( e c „ c . & _ U 49 (.Q,.. -- c C -u T •C S (0-e.- CC)..( --t`- ctle. 3.) List any other reasons to support this zone change. p T (5 4 \r C et S -��j Le ( �4-e l,tn.. CL-4Y�- t y C✓” L k-) I ` (1.4. lika 5vv r e c-714- +....,c`f~ Please also provide the following information for PDD rezonings: t k Statement of purpose andjntent of the proposed developm ent: To tAtto � f-c' t't. A list of proposed land uses: The applicant has prepared this application and supporting information and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto ar e true and correct. IF APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A POWER OF ATTORNEY STATEMENT FROM THE OWNER. ,--- 0 Am/ 7 � Signature of owner or . •••. scan Date (11- 14 a 6/13/03 CA Page 2 of 2 FOR ONLY �A�[NO (\_/ / DATE SUBMITTED (fr iffiffil6141111411111 ' crux 0F COLLEGE STATION /t'vvm x � /*riop°w"sn �� ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION =~��"�..°�� vw"��" ��°°.��"�=�.�"=�"�" (REZONING) • MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shall not be filed within a period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with permission of the Planning 8, Zoning Commission or City The following items must be submitted by ar established filing deadline date for consideration: L'" Application completed in full. $500.00 application fee Two (2) copies ofa fully dimensioned map on24''x36'' paper showing: a. Land affected; b. Legal description of area of proposed change; c. Present zoning; d. Zoning classification of all abutting land; and e. All public and private rights-of-way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land. �7VVrM8D legal description of subject property (metes & bounds or lot & block of subdivision, whichever is applicable). /7 The Rezoning Supporting Information sheet completed in full. A CAD ( ) or GIS (shp) digital file may be required for n�ore cornp|exrezoning requestn Date of Required Preapplication Conference: / / 01, ^« APPLICANT'S INFORMATION: Name /Y../ 2.1 / V /— PROPERTY OVVNEP'S|NF[)RMAT|nm • r 1-01230 L " T � / � Name 1��� r-�~^� �� ` . ��^ ~-/ ��t�� Street ---' Address 4P60 4 s. ^ y � City C-$ ��������~ y- ������/0» State - de ~� �^='�u E-M i| s ~u` c /�� ��� � ��� ^��� � Phon*Nunober � {^��_ � "'*~_ Fax Number ( y ^l�� /� c�~~-*�s0^)-- y�y� This property was conveyed to owner by deed dated and recorded in Vo|unn� �^p'~~ Page f the Brazos County Deed Records, General Location ofPropey: - ,~>`/ 1 -« 10 � 7 ��it�uw�± C+. Address ofPrope�y: ^^ �� ^ / ' / Legal Description: �� - � - �� 9 act � */ / '' / 1 - �'^/e��9�` 0 13 4 " Acreage - Total Property: l^ ,� Existing Zoning: �� ^�- Proposed Zoning: �� ��-~ Present Use ofProperiy: 041 / Proposed Use of ropey: 17,/ 6/13/03 Page 1orz REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION 1.) List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. - '11 1-1 e 71 Kt. -r),--,,,A, 7 0 c s Kyr L IO (t4 l / i 3 2) Ut 111' X 6 ' Orc- ( 0 le' ( /101-1 --- ( 9 WO ct(ci Lt,sz_ ...Cr. e (1 -e. ..-7 ,s" ro ' c c-n ii7 i 2.) Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. -5:0 ' Ill S t ‘c c 74 t / ' .5' ri ' t ( e-c .s iii q S /' '"" ?c-) r -t-t 4-c, v-c ire s it 7 ' 44 Z-- .. f f 7hr Is -c' /'‘-7 i a c 3.) List any other reasons to support this zone change. /. g c/../ /co-,-( 05--c._ i c_ A '17' frr 7 ie ,s-uw'r-c/t/t.- de ve l'll cit. /- - fX-c,- ,,, ,,,// o-e,._ VW € 0 6 7-e eA . i cie vs -e, -4-1.--tyay a • The applicant has prepared this application and supporting information and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correct. IF APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A POWER OF ATTORNEY STATEMENT FROM THE OWNER. X 7 -----/— . , ' 11,0(7._ I Sig 4 •re of *, ner (or agent) 4 .pplicant Date " ed cit'se/ , •-7' — ,1--1 'c_ 6/13/03 Page 2 of 2 INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES Water: Water lines (6" and 8") exist along Spring Loop and along on the southern property line of the parcel. Sewer: Access to sewer exists at the northeast corner of the parcel as well as at points along the western property line. Adequate sewer capacity exists in the immediate area, but upgrades are needed and anticipated to the Northeast Sewer Trunk line in the future. Streets: Access is to Spring Loop which is classified as a Major Collector on the Thoroughfare Plan. Off-site Easements: It does not appear that any are needed at this time for utility extensions. Drainage: Drainage is to a tributary of Carters Creek to the southwest. Floodplain: This parcel is within a Flood Zone X. Oversize request: None has been requested at this time. Impact Fees: None. NOTIFICATION: Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle; 7-19-2005 and 8-5-2005 Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 8-4-2005 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: 8-23-2005 Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners within 200': 28 Response Received: None, as of date of staff report. P:IGROUPIDevelopment ServicesIPlanning & Zoning CommissiontLegal Review 2005IAugust 4\Spring Loop rezoning again. DOC Created on 7/22/2005 9:16 AM Regular Agenda 11 Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Replat of Lot 2, Block 1 of the Liberty Subdivision, consisting of 3 lots on 7.703 acres, located at the southwest corner of the intersection of State Highway 6 and Southwest Parkway. Case #05 -112 (JP /CC) STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Jennifer Prochazka, Planner Report Date: July 22, 2005 Email: jprochazka@cstx.gov Meeting Date: August 4, 2005 Item: Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Replat of Lot 2, Block 1 of the Liberty Subdivision, consisting of 3 lots on 7.703 acres, located at the southwest corner of the intersection of State Highway 6 and Southwest Parkway. Applicant: Brenham National Bank, Agent for Owner Texas Hotel Management. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Replat as submitted. Item Summary: This item is for consideration of a Replat of one existing lot in preparation for commercial development. The property has frontage on Southwest Parkway and State Highway 6. The Replat retains an existing private access easement through the property for shared access. The location of this easement meets the City's requirements for minimum driveway separation distances. TxDOT reviewed and approved the construction of the drive to the State Highway 6 right -of -way. At that time, TxDOT stated that if the development has high demand or use, an acceleration /deceleration lane onto the frontage road may be required in the future. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The property is zoned C -1 General Commercial. The Land Use Plan designates the property as Retail Regional and Office. Southwest Parkway is classified a minor arterial and State Highway 6 is classified a freeway on the City's Thoroughfare Plan. This Plat is in compliance with the minimum requirements of the Subdivision Regulations. Item Background: The property was annexed in 1971 and zoned R -1 at that time. The property was rezoned from R -1 and A -P to C -1 in 2001. Liberty Subdivision was platted in 2004. Budgetary & Financial Summary: NA Commission Action Options: The Commission has final authority over the Replat. The options regarding the Replat are: • Approval • Denial Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Application 4. Copy of Replat / / / , , J 1 z 0 \ LL, CL t T' r N c r L._J 108, f - — # •2" A , 0 • (9 400,,,„ 1, , , „ , , FA r ., ( YcP 7- co 0 )--0 O a 80:,, o �d l • • '' • ' .�1P r n- co l ‘"\ C: 2 N 9 ' P 0 lif; RI U C' Itr,A*41.:\ \ • m . 9 lii k i\ %4 ° 11110 4 \ �� �o = W ° 6 r 4 • J 6. L a ,. n 1 1° O .�!f a s' -!� O O n n n -- m �t 1 ' •\') S1 / o I ".. Q' cv Y £ L °6 4P Q ° z w , <Y - s o a N O r W 6 ■ � CL v ' � /rS.' 1'ryO z 1 1 fr y ] 1Zt' J . . f1 n f1 ' Q- G W �� r A , :. fir QP i i ! �,� i •"� : " • I. • 7., Q "' ,06,00 oss zo o 2 :J. CD .-90,.A74),* ‘......,,,;,„ 8 _„ :4 Z --- ---- -eb 'cps 4 � � - r(.p, Alik ,,,,. c, ,0,4 coemit144...4 — 4 P&Z CASE FOR NO,: OFFICEU ON Y ") 1 DATE SUBMITTED: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION , ' I Planning d Development Srnrias FINAL PLAT APPLICATION (Check one) ❑ Minor ❑ Amending ❑ Final ❑ Vacating Replat ($300.00) ($300.00) ($400.00) ($400.00) 6 00.00)• *Includes public hearing fee The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for PSZ Commission consideration. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Filing Fee (see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets - $55.00 per additional sheet >� el Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations - $100 (if applicable) r1�1 Development Permit Application Fee of $200.00 (if applicable). NA Infrastructure Inspection Fee of $600.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed) Application completed in full. mr ti Copy of original deed restrictions /covenants for replats (if applicable). Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.) , A One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and /or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable). Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. Po Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable). Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of approval (if applicable). Date of Preapplication Conference: NAME OF SUBDIVISION L 5 + ` t , . i V 1 ( 5 i crt SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot & Block) L' :f, F3'/c k / APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): Name ( fie/VAT)] // 4e - ,k- ! Street Address �// 4. d/ Aiy fe e/ (RQ, 60x City 43 rii'',7t) r )) State T X Zip Code '71,733 E -Mail Address Phone Number I17V 43 ' Fax Number 97z/ ,c',, **75r 1 1 -1 - Vg PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name 14 5 /bi j7 i,' a !7k72 c L'r /dry 7� CTr� Street Address P.D. .cyt ,P6 City ,75' Ili cm State 1 e,..X ' ; Zip Code '7' E-Mail Address Phone Number Fax Number - '74 C __ C 51 ri/elor N €ER'S INFORMATION: Name ken- iU(Ve r) /� / 7 Street Address , �Y (./? (}i?Pi � // City t �'? If5Fo t�CeiiC) State / X Zip Code r /79 / E -Mail Address /004 e • " s (4) er Vert' ze r) . Yl e " Phone Number (-),? / Fax Number Jf7 /J - 4 ) q0 6/13/03 1 of 5 Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so, please provide the Volume and Page # Acreage -- Total Property 7, 7(8 Total # Of Lots R-O-W Acreage A/ f Existing Use: & ? r? { ref i� Proposed Use: (Yin mewl eti • Number Of Lots By Zoning District , r?{ / Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: / / / / Floodplain Acreage 0 A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and approved Master Plan and /or Preliminary Plat (if applicable): Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations & Reason For Same: Requested Oversize Participation: Total Linear Footage of Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: Proposed Public: ACREAGE: Streets Sidewalks # of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee Sanitary Sewer Lines # of acres in floodplain Water Lines # of acres in detention Channels # of acres in greenways Storm Sewers OR Bike Lanes / Paths FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: # of Single- Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $ (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct, and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above - identified final plat and attests that this request does not amend any covenants or restrictions associated with this plat. 4e.ecea,e...cc hfe_ Signature and Title Date i 6/13/03 2 of 5 Regular Agenda 13 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on the City Council June '05 Policy Retreat Report and the Key Result Area of Growth Management (JD) CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning & Development Services M emo To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Joey Dunn, Director of Planning & Development Services / ?? Date: August 1, 2005 L) Re: Growth Management Presentation Commissioners, some of you may have seen the recent presentation on growth management, given to Council at their July 25 Work Study Session. The topic of growth management is one of four main "key result areas" from the Council Retreat on June 13 -14, 2005: growth management, economic development, collaboration, and neighborhoods. Mr. Dick Bowers, a consultant from Arizona, led the Council Retreat discussion, and produced a follow -up report (summary is attached). As requested by Council at the Work Study, I will present this issue to the Commission as well, during the regular meeting on August 4 Council has asked for the P &Z to discuss this issue in light of its relationship with the pending Comprehensive Plan Update, and provide further recommendations to Council. A follow -up joint session between Council and P &Z will be scheduled within the next couple of months, after the Council holds work study sessions on each of their four key result areas. We have provided copies of each of the attachments that were included in the Council's packets for the July 25 Work Study: • Summary of Growth Management discussion at June 13 -14, 2005 Council Retreat • Briefing Paper from staff • Current Comprehensive Plan Goals & Objectives 1 Growth Management (From Bowers Report of Council Retreat on June 13 -14, 2005) Policy: To assure that the City is both ahead of the growth curve in its definition of systems and policies to manage growth, and very clear about its intentions for the character and quality of growth. • Manage growth wisely in a proactive and consistent manner. Don't let the growth process get ahead of our identification of what we want to become. • Examine the policies and systems in place and adjust to be certain that zoning regulations and infrastructure are consistent with positive business growth. • Focus on the attraction of desired new businesses and the retention of current ones. • Review our land use plan and how we do zoning to be sure it serves the vision the community holds for itself. • Annexation policy needs to be reviewed to be sure it serves College Station well. • Citizen communication and involvement is critical. Policy discussions need to be communicated well to our citizens and their active involvement in forming policy encouraged. • Engage all stakeholders in policy discussions. • It is very important that we first have vision clarity from Council regarding what we see for the future of College Station. • Our fundamental challenge is to maintain our quality of life, the "small town feel" that defines College Station, while we grow." • Smart growth requires balance and a distributed economic base. It is important that we use the tools we have to bring the right type of growth. We first need to be able to identify the desired element of successful growth. (see Economic Development section below) • Council needs to stay focused on the College Station vision and make decisions in the context of that vision. • The current vision is all things to all people, which makes it less useful, and we tend to sway from it when the pressure is on. • Communication is very important; the "why we are doing things" needs to be communicated proactively. • A shared vision centers us. Growth Management... Actions • Review the current mission and vision of the Council for the future of College Station and update as needed to have a shared Council perspective. • Develop improved ways to communicate with the public to both inform and engage regarding key policy formation. • In preparation for further policy discussion on the growth management issue, the City Manager will prepare a working paper to inform and serve as a starting point for a study session or series of study sessions. (Note: The idea of special study sessions to discuss important issues in depth without the burden of an action agenda was discussed a number of times throughout the day as a way to bring needed focus of attention and dialogue to the KRAs.) Briefing Paper for Council Work Session on Growth Management (Based on growth management issues identified in the Bower Rcport) A true holistic update of the City of College Station Comprehensive Plan can, and should, address all of the issues identified in the Growth Management Key Result Area: • Proactive and Consistent: The Comprehensive Plan is a 10-20 year window. It is the essential planning tool for a community to "get ahead of the gcowdbpruccou." It consists of the following areas of growth policy: o Vision: establishing overall guiding philosophy of growth & development o Community Profile: updated population, housing, employment projections o Land Use: identifying the highest and best use for all land within the city and its extraterritorial jurisdiction (ET}), and making predictions regarding future growth areas, based on historical data and eurrent or anticipated trends o Transportation: reflecting routes for all exi and future transportation facilities io the city and its ETJ (including ruuda,bike lanes, sidewalks, nnh6c�uou� etc.), engineering � � �u � , public transit, ,^ cu&/ ��ru�� principles, in accordance with land use plan assumptions o Urban : concepts for how we want the city to look in the future, including streetscaping, landscaping, gateways, corridors, special districts, neighborhoods, and other community appearance elements o Parks & Open Space: including greenways, and their relationship to residential, commercial, and other land uses o Water & Wastewater Systems: identifying in&astructure needed to support future growth in accordance with land use plan assumptions. o Implementation: identifying and re-evaluating the tools to achieve the vision, inc!uding the Unified Development Ordinance (zoning, subdivision regs, etc.), capital improvement projects (CIP), and funding sources. • Collaboration Opportunity with regard to Growth Management: The comprehensive plans for both cities of Bryan and College Station are in current need of update. Bryan has secured FYO5 funds for an 8-year update of its 1999 Bryan Comprehensive Plan. An FY06 service level adjustment is currently proposed for a 1 0-year update of the 1997 College Station Comprehensive Plan. Recent growth in both Bryan and College Station has physically brought the cities closer together than ever before. There is now an even greater interdependency in a shared economic base. This is an important and unusual window of opportunity for both cities to coordinate together on comrnon growth management issues: o Transportation: Develop a true County-wide Transportation P!an, with additiona! collaboration with Brazos County, the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), TxDOT, and TAMU. o Land Use: Exarnine redevelopment opportunities along existing corridors between the cities such as South College & Texas Avenue, as well as new deve!opment along common corridors such as University Drive & Hwy 47 This and other issues will be discussed arnong the Planning 8c Zoning Commissions ofboth College Station and Bryan at joint workshop session, to be held on Friday, July 22, 2005 A summary ofthe discussion at this meeti will be presented at the July 25t Council Work Session. • Citizen communication & stakeholder involvernent in growth management policy: The firs step in any major major cornprehensive plan update is public input, particularly in formulating a vision and phi for managing future growth and development. Cornmunication and input should be solicited early on in the process, through a variety of creative methods, such as: o Website updates o Newsletters, brochures, resource guides o Series ofcornrnunity forums o Small-group stakeholder interviews o Surveys o Pub!ic access channel • Review land use plan and zoning map tor consistency with the community's vision: State law requires zoning to be innplcononicd^iouccordoocc with a comprehensive plan" (7[.[}C Sect. 2l|.004). We rnust identify the "seams" of out- dated land use assurnptions in the areas not covered within recent neighborhood/ area plans, and re-examine College Station's ETJ growth areas to the south, east and west, in coordination with Transportation P!an changes. For example, a new rnajor jor outer loop around both communities would also have significant land use impacts upon fringe areas and at new rnajor jor intersections. • Positive Business Growth: What is the appropriate balance between regulation (zoning, developrnent codes) and incentive (economic development)? The vision statements, goals, and objectives in the Comprehensive Plan should provide guidance on what is the appropriate balance. • Annexation Policy: To get ahead ofthe growth process, an aggressive annexation policy should be considered. Recent numbers indicate that a larger portion of the new homes in this community are being built on estate lots in the ETJ, encumbering rnuch of the available land for future growth. Furthermore, there are concerns about controlling the level of standards applied to infrastructure in the ETJ that may eventually become the City's responsibi!ity to maintain. Care should be taken in deciding what specific ETJ areas should be included in a 3-year annexation plan. There are exemptions under state law for city-initiated annexations of areas containing less than 100 existing dwelling units. Areas included in an annexation plan cannot be annexed in less than 3 years from adoption. • Vision clarity from Council: Memorialize the Council's vision in an updated, adopted Comprehensive Plan. The statement, "Maintain quality of life, 'small town feel' that defines College Station while we grow" can be incorporated as a major vision statement. Staying focused and making decisions within the context ofthe vision, allow the vision to build upon itself. • Smart growth as a balanced, distributed economic base. Recognize the role College Station plays in the overall College Station-Bryan economy (people in Bryan shop in Coilege Station). Identify first the "right type ofgrowth" desired, and then the tools to get us there (L][>[), incentives, etc.) will be easier to use and implement. SECTION 2 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES College Station Comprehensive Plan City of College Station, Texas SECTION 2 - GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 2.01 - Methodology The process of developing a plan for a community, whether it be from scratch or revising an existing plan, must include numerous opportunities for public participation. The public participation process for the College Station Comprehensive Plan consisted of three steps: • A series of one -on -one interviews with the City's elected and appointed officials - specifically, the members of the City Council, and the Planning & Zoning Commission. • A series of stakeholder interviews in small groups. "Stakeholders" were comprised of homeowners, business representatives, church leaders, developers, and others with an interest in the future of College Station. A total of 31 stakeholders were interviewed. • A community-wide survey printed in the local newspaper. Approximately 21,000 survey forms were distributed throughout the College Station /Bryan area. A total of 171 households responded to the survey (equivalent to approximately 477 individuals). Public participation in the planning process was also encouraged during the project. A series of Community Workshops were conducted during 1994, 1995 and 1996, in addition to public hearings conducted by the College Station Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council. Based on the input received during the interview /survey process (summarized in Appendices B and C), a list of goals and objectives was developed. These goals and objectives replace the City's existing goals and objectives as contained in the City's 1990 document entitled "Comprehensive Planning Program Volume 11 - Development Guide ". 2.02 - Existing City The College Station City Council has adopted the following mission Vision- Statements statement and series of "Visions for the 21st Century" to help guide the City's growth. Existing City Mission Statement On behalf of the citizens of College Station, the City Council will promote the safety, health, and general well -being of our community within the bounds of fiscal responsibility while preserving and advancing the quality of life for its citizens. April 1997 Page 7 College Station Comprehensive Plan City of College Station, Texas Existing City Vision - Statements • Transportation - Citizens benefit from the ability to move into, out of, and within College Station in a safe and efficient manner. • Parks and Recreation- Citizens benefit from parks and recreational activities that are geographically and demographically accessible and serve a diversity of interests. • Health and Public Safety - Citizens benefit from a reasonably safe and secure environment. • Education and Information - Citizens benefit from access to broad -based information and knowledge. • Quality Services - Citizens benefit from value and quality services delivered at a reasonable tax rate. • Cultural Arts - Citizens benefit from a participation in the arts. • Employment and Prosperity - Citizens benefit from an environment that is conducive to providing diverse employment opportunities. • Civic Pride - Citizens benefit from well - planned, attractive residential and commercial areas, and from preserving historic areas. After reviewing the City's current mission statement and end - statements, it was determined that these statements remain valid for College Station. The interview /survey results were combined with the City's existing goals and objectives (the "Volume II" document) to arrive at the following list of goals and objectives to guide the development of the Comprehensive Plan. 2.03 - Land Use Goal #1 - College Station should continue to provide and locate Goals and adequate amounts of appropriately zoned land for all necessary Objectives types of land uses in an efficient, convenient, harmonious, and ecologically sound manner. • Objective 1.1 - College Station should plan future land uses together with thoroughfare and utility improvements /extensions in order to assure appropriate access /service for new growth. • Objective 1.2 - College Station should promote the use of vacant land in the existing sewershed area where City infrastructure and services are readily available in order to avoid costs to the City of providing extended services. April 1997 Page B College Station Comprehensive Plan City of College Station, Texas • Objective 1.3 - College Station should continue to avoid strip commercial development (such as that along Texas Avenue) and encourage centralized commercial development which encourages multi -modal access. • Objective 1.4 - College Station should identify the most appropriate and use for all undeveloped parcels within its City limits and its ETj and use its development powers (including zoning and capital improvement programs) to guide the locations of desired development. • Objective 1.5 - College Station should maintain its Comprehensive Plan through periodic updates as changes occur in growth rates or major development policies. Goal #2 - College Station should continue to provide for the orderly development of existing and future land uses. • Objective 2.1 - College Station should develop standards for providing appropriate buffering and screening between residential and non - residential uses. • Objective 2.2 - College Station should develop standards that promote a reduction of land use intensity as development approaches established and future residential areas. • Objective 2.3 - College Station should encourage compatible in -fill development in areas between neighborhoods, such as neighborhood retail. • Objective 2.4 - College Station should develop zoning districts which allow a mixture of residential and non- residential uses which complement and support each other with appropriate buffering. Goal #3 - College Station should continue to protect, preserve and enhance existing and future neighborhoods. • Objective 3.1 - College Station should continue to protect the integrity of residential areas by minimizing intrusive and incompatible land uses and densities. • Objective 3.2 - College Station should encourage compatible in -fill development, such as small -scale neighborhood retail, adjacent to residential neighborhoods with appropriate buffering. • Objective 3.3 - College Station should encourage mixed -use developments which provide for an appropriate combination of residential and support uses. April 1997 Page 9 College Station Comprehensive Plan City of College Station, Texas Goal #4 - College Station should continue to encourage community participation and involvement. • Objective 4.1 - College Station should continue to actively involve citizens and business interests in the development review and approval process. • Objective 4.2 - College Station should encourage residents to be actively involved in community decisions and should promote initiatives through community meetings, neighborhood associations, business groups, interest groups, and similar organizations. • Objective 4.3 - College Station should encourage public- private partnership in resolving community issues. • Objective 4.4 - College Station should actively inform residents of current land use decisions under consideration and educate citizens and community organizations about the associated issues. Goal #5 - College Station should encourage development that is in harmony with the environment. • Objective 5.1 - College Station should prohibit reclamation of the floodway associated with Carter Creek, Lick Creek, Wolf Pen Creek, and the Brazos River in order to prevent upstream flooding, avoid long term structural and erosion problems associated with floodplain reclamation, and to provide a city wide network of natural open space. • Objective 5.2 - College Station should allow compact, "village " -style development patterns in appropriate areas such as in Northgate and Eastgate /College Hills. • Objective 5.3 - College Station should continue to comply with all existing and future State and Federal regulations that identify and protect natural areas. - Objective 5.4 - College Station may consider new land uses and development patterns that were not anticipated by the Compre- hensive Plan, provided these new land uses and development patterns are compatible with the environment and any surrounding development.. April 1997 Page 10 College Station Comprehensive Plan City of College Station, Texas Goal #6 - College Station should continue to preserve /protect significant features, such as culturally and architecturally significant historic buildings. • Objective 6.1 - College Station should inventory all historically significant structures and landmarks within the City limits and ETJ to be used for State and National preservation designation, as appropriate. • Objective 6.2 - College Station should develop a "Historic Overlay" zoning district which may be applied to historically- significant areas. Goal #7 - College Station should continue to designate open space and public space areas for recreation and preservation uses. • Objective 7.1 - College Station should modify its parkland donation /purchase policy to allow "cash in lieu of land" payments to be escrowed for a maximum of 5 years. • Objective 7.2 - College Station should continue to provide recreational opportunities in new neighborhoods and other developed and "urbanized" areas, such as Northgate. • Objective 7.3 - College Station should continue to jointly develop and maintain future parks and recreation areas with other public agencies, including the College Station Independent School District, the Bryan Independent School District, the University, the City of Bryan, and Brazos County. Goal #8 - College Station should designate special districts and corridors in the City limits for unique types of development. • Objective 8.1 - College Station should continue to allow development of the Wolf Pen Creek District with recreational, retail, office, and residential uses. • Objective 8.2 - College Station should implement the Northgate Redevelopment Plan as adopted by City Council in December 1995. • Objective 8.3 - College Station should study the Eastgate /College Hills neighborhood and develop a redevelopment/revitalization plan for this area as a more stable single - family neighborhood. April 1991 Page 11 College Station Comprehensive Plan City of College Station, Texas • Objective 8.4 - College Station should study the Southside neighborhood and develop a preservation /enhancement plan for this area. • Objective 8.5 - College Station should designate Texas Avenue, George Bush Drive, FM 2818, University Drive, and Wellborn Road as streetscape corridors for enhancement and protection. • Objective 8,6 - College Station should designate the East Bypass (from Harvey Road to Graham Road) as a "special district" to protect existing and future residential developments from adjacent incompatible uses. Goal #9 - College Station should continue to review and revise its development ordinances. • Objective 9.1 - College Station should reformat its development ordinances into a single document (a Land Development Guide) for ease of reference. Any areas of incompatibility and conflict should be identified and resolved. • Objective 9.2 - College Station should update its Zoning Ordinance to make it compatible with the revised Comprehensive Plan. • Objective 9.3 - College Station should update its Subdivision Regulations Ordinance to make it compatible with the revised Comprehensive Plan. Goal #10 - College Station should monitor growth over the next 20 years to assure that the Comprehensive Plan is kept current. • Objective 10.1 - College Station should review and update of the Comprehensive Plan as warranted based upon changes in population growth, A & M enrollment policies and economic development. • Objective 10.2 - College Station should monitor its residential growth rate to determine if the annual rate is between 2% and 4 %. If the residential growth rate is not within this range, the City may positively manage its growth through such mechanisms as the Capital Improvements Program, annexation, and other growth management tools. • Objective 10.3 - The cities of College Station and Bryan should, continue to abide by the joint resolution which determines the ultimate extension of each city's boundary. April 1997 Page 12 College Station Comprehensive Plan City of College Station, Texas 2.04 - Housing Goals Goal #1 - College Station should continue to provide an and Objectives appropriate supply of housing with a wide variety of housing types and costs. • Objective 1.1 - College Station should continue to maintain the integrity of the existing housing supply by enforcement of the housing code and other controls. • Objective 1.2 - College Station should continue to review and upgrade the minimum building codes in order to ensure quality and economic construction. • Objective 1.3 - College Station should continue to encourage new construction which is energy efficient. • Objective 1.4 - College Station should continue to upgrade neighborhoods and individual structures which are deteriorated or dilapidated. • Objective 1.5 - College Station should continue to encourage the development of diversified housing types for low- and fixed- income residents through Community Development Block Grant- funded programs and other financial resources. • Objective 1.6 - College Station should continue to evaluate existing codes relative to advances in technology and materials. 2.05 - Community Goal #1 - College Station should continue to promote a Appearance Goals beautiful and safe environment. and Objectives • Objective 1.1 - College Station should continue to improve and maintain the appearance of its municipal properties. • Objective 1.2 - College Station should continue to promote good site design, provide a good appearance, minimize drainage impacts, and increase pedestrian safety. The City should continue to use high quality design of public buildings and landscaping to serve as a model for the private sector. • Objective 1.3 - College Station should develop and encourage innovative solutions that are aesthetically pleasing and environmentally sensitive to abate flooding and drainage problems in the City. April 1997 Page 13 College Station Comprehensive Plan City of College Station, Texas • Objective 1.4 - College Station should continue to minimize and eliminate unsightly conditions such as junkyards, abandoned vehicles, dilapidated buildings /structures /fences, and excessive weeds and rubbish. The City should assure maintenance of signs and fences and the longevity of required landscaping through effective code enforcement. • Objective 1.5 - College Station should continue to promote community-wide pride in the City. • Objective 14 - College Station should continue to implement its street tree planting program in coordination with the Streetscape Plan (as previously adopted by the City Council). • Objective 1.7 - College Station should continue to use high quality design of public buildings and Landscaping to serve as a model for the private sector. • Objective 1.8 - College Station should continue to implement the main gateways into the City along major corridors, including Texas Avenue, SH 6, University Drive, SH 47, Wellborn Road, and FM 2818. 2.06 - Economic Goal #1 - College Station should continue to encourage Development Goals diversification of the local economy. and Objectives • Objective 1.1 - College Station should continue to encourage industrial, commercial, and residential development to serve residents' needs which is in harmony with the environment and surrounding development patterns. • Objective 1.2 - College Station should continue to encourage the retention and expansion of existing retail in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan, especially in older redeveloping areas like the Northgate district. • Objective 1.3 - College Station should continue to attract other professional businesses that would enhance the area's quality of life, including medical care, restaurants, and small professional offices. • Objective 1.4 - College Station should continue to promote tourism and convention business, especially with regard to facilities such as the George Bush Presidential Library Center and the University. • Objective 1.5 - College Station should encourage the development of compatible uses to complement the University, such as additional lodging, restaurant or conference facilities. April 1997 Page 14 College Station Comprehensive Plan City of College Station, Texas • Objective 1.6 - College Station should encourage the kinds of goods and services that attract retirees to the community. Goal #2 - College Station should continue to work cooperatively with the University, the College Station ISO, the City of Bryan, and Brazos County regarding proposed future plans. • Objective 2.1 - College Station, the University, the College Station ISD, the City of Bryan, and Brazos County should continue to work closely together to determine creative and innovative solutions that benefit all parties. • Objective 2.2 - College Station, the University, the College Station ISD, the City of Bryan, and Brazos County should annually review their goals and objectives to determine if the statements are still valid or if revisions are warranted. • Objective 2.3 - College Station, the University, the College Station 1SD, the City of Bryan, and Brazos County should work cooperatively to attract new industries and developments to the region. 2.07 - Transporta- Goat #1 - College Station should balance the development of tion Goals and all modes of transportation to assure the fast, convenient, Objectives efficient and safe movement of people and goods to, from, and within the community while continuing to protect the integrity of neighborhoods. • Objective 1.1 - College Station should continue to work with TxDOT to provide for the development/redevelopment of major arterial routes - including Texas Avenue, Wellborn Road, Harvey Road, University Drive, and George Bush Drive - as necessary to help ease traffic congestion. • Objective 1.2 - College Station should develop and improve minor arterial and collector streets which parallel Texas Avenue to accommodate the need for north /south mobility. • Objective 1.3 - College Station should continue to develop adequate, safe systems for pedestrian and bicycle movement between neighborhoods, schools, parks, retail /office areas, and the University. • Objective 1.4 - College Station should continue to work with the University and Brazos Valley Transit to monitor the need for further development of public transportation systems. April 1997 PagelS College Station Comprehensive Plan City of College Station, Texas • Objective 1.5 - College Station should continue to cooperate with other local entities in efforts to minimize adverse effects of the railroad tracks paralleling Wellborn Road and at -grade crossings on access to the City and the University campus. • Objective 1.6 - College Station should continue to work with the University to provide adequate air transportation by continuing the development of air transportation facilities as part of an overall transportation plan and connections to the ground transportation system. The City should also continue to support the on -going development of Easterwood Airport through runway extensions, terminal improvements, and additional air carrier service, as needed. • Objective 1.7 - College Station should continue to provide for the routing of goods and services delivery vehicles to assure minimal adverse impacts on residential neighborhoods. • Objective 1.$ - College Station should work to encourage the reduction of travel through demand management techniques such as carpooling and van - pooling. Goal #2 - College Station should continue to ensure the development, maintenance and operation of a safe, efficient and effective transportation system to serve the City. • Objective 2.1 - College Station should continue to develop and maintain a transportation planning process which addresses long range needs and emphasizes short and mid -range problem - solving. • Objective 2.2 - College Station should continue to develop and maintain regularly - scheduled programs and funding strategies to implement new thoroughfare plan street improvements, ensuring adequate capacity at the least cost to the City without compromising service, delivery, or quality. • Objective 2.3 - College Station should continue an organized preventative maintenance program, including the residential street pavement management programs, to ensure safety and long, economical life. • Objective 2.4 - College Station should continue to provide a system of bikeways and walkways throughout the City and provide incentives for the use of non - motorized transport. The City should also continue to revise and update its Citywide Bikeway Master Plan. April 1997 Page 16 College Station Comprehensive Plan City of College Station, Texas • Objective 2.5 - College Station should encourage the provision of railroad facilities, and service to the City's established and future industrial areas, which are compatible with traffic operations and safety considerations. • Objective 2,6 - College Station should encourage the provision of a fiscally responsible transit system which gives consideration to journey -to -work trips, the needs of transit dependent persons, and opportunities for inter -modal transfer. Goal #3 - College Station should continue to ensure a balanced relationship between land use development and the transportation system. • Objective 3.1 - College Station should maintain administrative procedures and responsibilities for the preparation, review and approval of transportation plans which are directly related to proposed land use development plans. • Objective 3.2 - College Station should continue to maintain a Master Thoroughfare Plan which is coordinated with the land use development considerations represented in the Comprehensive plan which permits the following: a. Right -of -way dedications as specified by the Master Thoroughfare Plan. b. Right -of -way acquisition necessary to improve intersection capacity and thoroughfare continuity. c. Intersection designs and street alignments to meet existing and projected traffic demand. d. Dedication of street system rights -of -way in those areas of the community that are undeveloped. • Objective 3.3 - College Station should continue to enforce street design criteria for all new developments. • Objective 3.4 - College Station should continue to coordinate local, State and Federal street/highway improvement project planning with existing and projected land uses. • Objective 3.5 - College Station should locate and design thoroughfares to provide a high level of design amenity and neighborhood preservation, including the consideration of neighborhood traffic management programs in developed areas. April 1997 Page 17 College Station Comprehensive Plan City of College Station, Texas • Objective 3.6 - College Station should continue to promote its functional classification system to provide for the graduation of traffic flow from the movement function to the access function. • Objective 3.7 - College Station should continue to promote a program of access management to minimize vehicular conflicts on collector and arterial streets. Goal #4 - College Station should develop a street and parking system which ensures economically healthy cultural, historic, civic, and commercial areas. • Objective 4.1 - College Station should provide adequate and strategically located parking to serve business, government, and cultural activities in existing areas and in the proposed Civic Center area as contained in the Comprehensive Plan. • Objective 4.2 - College Station should provide for physical and operational improvements to the street system which enhance the orderly, safe and efficient movement of vehicular traffic and pedestrians to, through, and within existing businesses and cultural areas and the proposed Civic Center area. as contained in the Comprehensive Plan. • Objective 4.3 - College Station should continue to promote and maintain a program to minimize the use of on- street parking where it interferes with or otherwise impedes the flow of traffic on collector and arterial streets. Goal #5 - College Station should provide for the safe movement of pedestrians and bicyclists within College Station. • Objective 5.1 - College Station should continue to encourage the use of alternate modes of transportation to reduce air pollution and traffic congestion, including transit, bicycle, and pedestrian. • Objective 5.2 - College Station should continue to encourage that new developments be designed to minimize cut - through traffic, especially in residential neighborhoods and pedestrian areas, such as EastgatelCallege Hills, the East Bypass neighborhoods, and Southside. April 1997 Page 18 College Station Comprehensive Plan City of College Station, Texas • Objective 5.3 - College Station should continue to provide sidewalk access in all residential areas, and maintain the existing sidewalk network. • Objective 5A - College Station should adopt street design standards and parking policies which are "bicycle- friendly ". • Objective 5.5 - College Station should continue to provide bikeways between residential areas, parks, schools, the University, and retail /employment centers. Goal #6 - College Station should continue to work with the Brazos valley Transit System and the University to provide for efficient bus service within the community. • Objective 6.1 - College Station should encourage the use of transit to reduce air pollution and traffic congestion by supporting things such as: a. Mass transit facilities for existing and new developments. b. Texas A & M University Shuttle and Urban Trolley transit service between all residential areas, the University, retail and employment centers, and between regional destinations • Objective 6.2 - College Station should examine and promote land use concepts which enhance transit usage. 2.08 - Parks and Goal #1 - College Station should continue to enhance its Recreation Goals system of parks, recreation facilities, and open space. and Objectives • Objective 1.1 - College Station should continue to maintain the high quality and wide variety of park and recreation resources now available to residents and visitors, and to provide for expansion as needed. • Objective 1.2 - College Station should encourage additional connections between selected parks /recreation areas and residential areas by a system of linear parks /parkways /greenbelts which utilize creek beds, drainage ways, portions of the 100 -year floodplain, and other natural features. April 1997 Page 19 College Station Comprehensive Plan City of College Station, Texas Goal #2 - College Station should continue to provide the highest quality parks and recreational facilities. • Objective 2.1 - College Station should continue to maintain and improve all existing City parks, equipment, and grounds. • Objective 2.2 - College Station should continue to develop and maintain a variety of parks and park improvements, including neighborhood playgrounds, "vest- pocket" parks, linear natural corridors, and special streetscape areas in locations such as Northgate and along Texas Avenue. • Objective 2.3- College Station should continue to jointly develop and maintain parks and recreation areas with other public agencies, including the University, College Station independent School District, and Brazos County. Goal #3 - Develop greenbelts to connect park and residential areas. • Objective 3.1 - College Station should develop a donation /purchase policy to acquire elected portions of the 100 -year floodplain on properties that have been platted or developed to provide natural corridors to be used for open space and passive recreation uses that will link parks to one another and to residential areas. • Objective 3.2 - College Station should, in cooperation with community groups such as the Brazos Greenway Council, designate selected portions of the 100 -year floodplain on undeveloped properties as "natural corridors" that are to be used for open space and passive recreation uses that will link parks to one another and to residential areas. 2.09 - Utility Goals Goal #1 - College Station should continue to provide the and Objectives quantity and quality of utilities needed to assure public health, safety, and accommodation of growth. • Objective 1.1 - College Station should investigate and develop, if necessary, surface water sources to meet current and future needs. • Objective 1.2 - College Station should update the water and wastewater master system plan every 10 years and perform a detailed master plan review every 5 years. April 1997 Page 20 College Station Comprehensive Plan City of College Station, Texas • Objective 1.3 - College Station should review and adjust its financial plan to maintain and enhance the City's bond rating to minimize the cost of major capital expenditures. Goal #2 - College Station should continue to provide the highest level of water service. • Objective 2.1 - College Station should continue to serve all developed parcels within the city limits with City water service. Water service should be extended to undeveloped areas outside the city limits only as a condition of annexation. • Objective 2.2 - College Station should develop a water distribution system replacement schedule for older lines in the system, such as the Northgate and Eastgate /College Hills areas, to increase the reliability of the system in these areas. • Objective 2.3 - College Station should continue to expand both ground and elevated water storage capacity to increase pressure and fire -flow as growth occurs. Goal #3 - Provide the highest level of sanitary sewer service. • Objective 3.1 - College Station should continue to serve all developed parcels within the city limits with City sanitary sewer service. Sewer service should be extended to undeveloped areas outside the city limits only as a condition of annexation. • Objective 3.2 - College Station should identify the older parts of the sanitary sewer collection system and develop a plan for replacement and /or rehabilitation of these lines to reduce system infiltration and increase system reliability. Goal #4 - College Station should continue to provide for adequate storm drainage and stormwater management. • Objective 4.1 - College Station should develop a plan to manage current and projected stormwater run -off in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. • Objective 4.2 - College Station should begin to address solutions to stormwater management which incorporate "soft" techniques, such as stream side buffers and soil bioengineering, as part of an overall stormwater management plan. April 1997 Page 21 College Station Comprehensive Plan City of College Station, Texas Goal #5 - College Station should continue to provide the highest quality and most efficient solid waste disposal system. • Objective 5.1 - College Station should continue to encourage reduction or recycling of the total amount of municipal solid waste to reach the USEPA/TNRCC goal of 40% diversion by the Year 2000. The City should continue single - family residential curbside programs and/or other cost - effective programs and establish commercial and multi - family programs to reach the 40% goal. • Objective 5.2 - College Station should project the useable life -span of its existing landfill and begin planning needed expansions or land acquisitions 5 -10 years in advance of actual need. • Objective 5.3 - College Station should eliminate the landfill disposal of bagged yard waste by promoting "Don't Bag k", backyard composting and /or use of compostable bags for inclusion with "Clean Green" brush collection. • Objective 5.4 - College Station should expand its recycling facilities to include recycling drop -off centers. April 1997 Page 22