Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/21/2005 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning Commission 41/111111111 PILE COPY CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning er Development Services AGENDA Workshop Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, July 21, 2005, at 6:00 p.m. Administrative Conference Room, City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 1. Call the meeting to order. 2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. 3. Discussion of minor, amending and revised plats approved by Staff. 05 -91 Bald Prairie Subdivision OP) 05 -98 Graham Corner Plaza (TF) 3. Presentation, discussion, and possible action of P &Z Plan of Work. 4. Presentation, discussion, and possible action of the draft Subdivision Regulations. 5. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings July 22, 2005, 11:00 a.m. - 1:00 p.m. - Joint Meeting of Bryan and College Station Planning & Zoning Commissions, at Bryan City Hall 6. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 7. Adjourn Consultation with Attorney {Gov't Code Section 551.0711; possible action The Planning and Zoning Commission may seek advice from its attorney regarding a pending and contemplated litigation subject or attorney -client privileged information. After executive session discussion, any final action or vote taken will be in public. If litigation or attomey -client privileged information issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, an executive session will be held. This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicapped parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call 979 -764 -3517 or (1'DD) 1- 800 -735- 2989. Agendas posted on Internet Website http: / /www.cstx.gov and Cable Access Channel 19. Workshop Agenda 3 Presentation, discussion, and possible action of P &Z Plan of Work. in 0 0 r tn o O IL N 1- ate aS N co '*-#4,,,,,t,,,,,-.;,----- ti. s D trl O : is c1 0 a O cu ti co V1 � ., W O 0) • ~ a a . ° o a � � o0 o n on 'on bn Q. C3 . , ,vpv� v 2 vp U' to H n — bn •� O — �. O , k , �'� - o° o .. o o ° o a m �� ~ ▪ -o E a.) to g o E N el c a V �" g24 g c G U ▪ � _ rr r _ U (I) O z ° F N cri vi \C; Q [� o0 0 0 CV an p ` Y - E : 35. Q LL ,1 r N cti :1- 4 , 4:1 - C -, iiiti4r-WW.: ti: -0 a) F l 4; �` 0 ' SL Y }` z '" In �„F+ °� � s o * 3 N O o N Z v, N H ., • ti o U a� a> a> ^' �+ E M • --r p, o o - - o > ° • • 9. t v� - ` as > w a ' a 1) a ¢. E 0 a b - o . .tc ` t.- s, ate ' 0 a) !DA 0 pp 0 a> up r °� 4't U o ° o U 12 o ° o U o° o �� • .--, 03 p4 vp ,,;,„, � bA 0 r � >, N � N [� 44 a � t z c'3 o U 0 Pt., 0 ct r'*-,!---kgft._ +' N N N 0 ,, ° u C. A n v b 1 1 i o o a N r vi 0 r 0 in ,. r - . = v -) • a cu cu o kr, o o ° N � ° ° N • ii oo -, zL, H ,_. CL rc ;,- L cv O O N cij aq C �1 C/D cn 44 0 1 b _ O N 4u CD �. W co cD CD ' b b M co 0 o "':" ' 1).''. :I ' ' ': 3 .E U. o N ,. M bQ r L/) as _ a - U ro - rt ' o c • a ' g 3 - C) �I ° ' Q cl o mo, a t P..4 ° i o a Q O U • Q p 4� Will bA N Q to e o a >, • o a� r' to 3 5 • a r� r -d b -o � + t o N M V i • l� .... `€ '— of �i W M t ri .* 1 0 115111111111 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning eir Development Services AGENDA Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, July 21, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers, College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 1. Call meeting to order. 2. Hear Citizens. At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address the Commission on planning and zoning issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The citizen presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.) All matters listed under Item 2, Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Planning and Zoning Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subditision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. There will not be separate discussion of these items. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it will be moved to the RegularAgenda for further consideration. 3. Consent Agenda. 3.1 Discussion and possible action on: Minutes — July 7, 2005, Workshop Meeting Minutes — July 7, 2005, Regular Meeting 3.2 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for the Cove of Nantucket Subdivision, consisting of 68 lots and 4 common areas on 17.81 acres, generally located along the west side of State Highway 6, south of the intersection of State Highway 6 and Nantucket Drive. Case #05 -108 (JP) Regular Agenda. 4. Consideration, discussion and possible action on request(s) for absence from meetings. Marilyn Hooton — July 7, 2005, Meeting Bill Davis — July 21, 2005, Meeting Bill Davis — July 22, 2005, Joint Meeting w /Bryan P &Z 5. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. 6. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on College Station Bike and Hike Task Force's Recommendations. (KF) 7. Presentation, discussion and possible action on a request to re- consider a rezoning within 180 days of denial for 4.7 acres generally located at 1000 Spring Loop from A -P, Administrative- Professional to R -4, Multi- family. Case #05 -107 (TF) 8. Adjourn. Consultation with Attorney (Gov't Code Section 551.0711 s possible action, The Planning and Zoning Commission may seek advice from its attorney regarding a pending and contemplated litigation subject or attorney - client privileged information. After executive session discussion, any final action or vote taken will be in public. If litigation or attorney - client privileged information issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, an executive session will be held. This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicapped parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call 979 - 764 -3517 or (TDD) 1- 800 - 735 -2989. Agendas posted on Internet Website http: / /www.cstx.gov and Cable Access Channel 19. Consent Agenda 3.1 Discussion and possible action on: Minutes — July 7, 2005, Workshop Meeting Minutes — July 7, 2005, Regular Meeting MINUTES Workshop Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, July 7, 2005, at 6:00 p.m. Administrative Conference Room College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue Vi 5414 College Station, Texas CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning U' Development Services COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman Scott Shaf, , C mmissio a : Harold Strong, John Nichols, Dennis Christiansen, Bill Davis and Ken Reyrialds. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Commission r arilyn Hooton. CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF PRESENT: Staff Planners Lindsay Boyer, Jennifer Prochazka, and Molly 1 itti i'c Senior PlannetlfrOy Fletcher, Assistant City Engineer Alan Gibbs, Graduate Civil Engine-Ors Cltter and Jcgsh Norton, Assistant Director Lance Simms and Staff Assistant Lisa Lindgren; OTHER CITY STAFF PRES T: Firs ;Assistant City Attorney Roxanne Nemcik. 1. Call to Order. Commitfgft§hafef 600 the workshop meeting to order at 6:03 p.m. 2. th of office fur . Plant - and Zoning Commissioners <::: Dennis Christsen 'xold Chairman •Slg*r „ #e the oath of office for the two new Planning and Zoning Commissioners niiis Christiansen and Harold Strong. Commissioners Christiansen and Strong accepted the oath and the new appointment to the Planning & Zoning Commission. 3. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. Commissioner Davis asked for clarification regarding the variances for Williams Creek Subdivision, Phase 4. Graduate Civil Engineer Carol Cotter stated that the applicant had turned in a preliminary plat for phases one through four. There were issues with dedication of half of the right of way, acceptance of public infrastructure by the City and a few other issues. P&Z Workshop Minutes July 7, 2005 Page 1 of 4 Commissioner Davis asked if the Commission would see these same things again for all phases. Cotter stated that the project consists of phases one through four, the applicant has final platted phases one, two and four and then three will come before the Commission again. The rezoning that came for additional acreage will be brought before the Commission for a preliminary plat; it was not included in the initial preliminary plat. Commissioner Davis also had questions regarding the Callaway Subdivision, Phase 2, on the consent and regular agenda. Commissioner Davis asked it if was unusual for the Commission to see both the preliminary and final at the same meeting. Jennifer Prochazka, Staff Planner, stated that it happens period 'ally ,:: Prochazka stated that this was a one lot subdivision and that there is an optic in the Unified Development Ordinance that states that the applicant has the option ?'take'oth to the Commission, if they submit all information for a preliminary plat to the;ity. Th<pplicant's choice was to take both to the Commission. Commissioner Davis asked for clarification rerding the. of alley wars: ,Da asked if that is why variances were being requesteckiif4iiib.ps 4 and 6 on the regula?Iiiiida. Senior Planner, Trey Fletcher stated that was correct. Commissioner Nichols asked far,, clarification regardng, the arguments for Mark Smith making this change in the new subd vis on ordinance. N 1s stated that it seems to be an issue of the alleys being only 12 feet;lan Gibbs, .M City Engineer, stated that he thinks the issue is that there will bkmor6:#00kwace and or utilities it is a little easier as far as maintenance. It is also a little cheaper for`tl e ev Ioper and that this is an incentive to encourage developer to do this. Regarding Au Chase Subdivision, item $ on the regular agenda. Commissioner Davis asked if Cornell ;?alreadysaved all the way:ough from Brentwood to Manuel Drive. r . all through. � �`= ka staff' >: at the 5tree already paved al the way ��:. >;:;:;j'zaz d �.::: Y p Y g :: mmissioner N.60::::gsked regarding the Comprehensive Plan Amendment "'lrpending the L•Use Plan 'or 1000 Spring Loop. He asked why it is being removed from Reg Trey Fletc Senior Planner, stated that the City Council did bring up a number of issues. The first ort b ing tk compliance of the comprehensive plan. Other issues were traffic and congestion in't 7 i 'ea. Commissioner Nichols asked for clarification regarding all the variances on Indian Lakes. Molly Hitchcock, Staff Planner, informed the Commission that only the requested variances for streets, lot width and utility layout apply to the City. The other variances requested are to Brazos County Subdivision Regulations and would have to be considered by the Commissioners Court. There was discussion regarding the requirements the applicant must meet even though they are building in the county in the ETJ. Roxanne Nemcik, Assistant City Attorney, read P &Z Workshop Minutes July 7, 2005 Page 2 of 4 section 5 out of the Subdivision Regulations. Copies of that section were given to Commissioners so they could use it as a review when making their decision on this item. 4. Discussion of minor and amending plats approved by Staff. 05 -91 Bald Prairie Subdivision (JP) 05 -98 Graham Corner Plaza (TF) Due to time constraints, this item was passed and will be reviewed at the next workshop. 5. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the P &Z Plari`'of Work. Lance Simms, Assistant Director, and Scott Shafer,. explained to the new Commissioners what the plan of work was and that it is ti4# standsitem on the agenda each time. They encouraged them to make any commets regarding the plan of work. 6. Presentation, discussion, and possible action' crding tk status of the dift> Subdivision Regulations. Mark Smith was not present at thg..workshop; this iteiii4lll be moved to the next Planning and Zoning Workshop meeting. 7. Presentation, Discussion and possib; actio;rding the,:1P &Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings 'l`BA Joint 'Mebt4t,of Bryan and:College Station PIanning & Zoning :;ttmmissiorx at Bryan City` `-Hall Lance Simms, Assis t > . D to Mated th.4:t''they are still working on a date for the joint meetln i :Br_ an PI iR & :26nrefikPmmission, but at this time it looks as if the best (14e Friday,. J y 22, .2 Commissioners will be notified on a set date as soon as ssible. 8. Dis§ and possilbleaction: on future agenda items — A Planning and Zoning Member may iie about a sect for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual i iri" rtnation or e recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited t::tropo1 to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. Commissioner Davis stated that there were several places around the City that had visibility problems, from'brush encroachment, when pulling out of a parking lot onto the street. Alan Gibbs, Assistant City Engineer, stated to send the information to Mark Smith and that he would determine what area these problems were in and pass along the information to the appropriate party. Commissioner Reynolds suggested that it may beneficial for the Planning & Zoning Commission to divide up the responsibilities in order to interface with staff regarding certain areas /topics, i.e., transportation, neighborhood, etc.. Commissioner Reynolds stated that P &Z Workshop Minutes July 7, 2005 Page 3 of 4 this may save time in the long run. He stated that this may not be an actual agenda item, but that the Commission may want to discuss this at some point and time. Commissioner Davis asked for an approximate time period of when the Emerald Forest Comprehensive Plan Amendment may be coming before the Commission. Jennifer Prochazka, Staff Planner, stated that there is a traffic study being done at the end of the month and that a meeting between the HOA, Developers, and staff is scheduled for July 19, 2005, in order to get things started. 9. Adjourn Commissioner Davis motioned to adjourn the meeting "+mmissioner Christiansen seconded the motion, motion passed (6 -0). Approved: Scott Shafer, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission!::: Attest: Lisa Lindgren. Planiin >cvelopmervices P &Z Workshop Minutes July 7, 2005 Page 4 of 4 Regular Agenda 6 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on College Station Bike and Hike Task Force's Recommendations. (KF) CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning d Development Services MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Ken Fogle, Transportation Planner DATE: July 14, 2005 RE: Bike and Hike Task Force Recommendations The Bike and Hike Task Force was established in the fall of 2004 as an ad -hoc committee to facilitate the development of an interconnected transportation network that promotes bicycling, walking, and other non - vehicular modes as fully accepted forms of transportation. The goals of the committee focused on three areas: • Identify and prioritize hike and bike projects for CIP funding • Review the Bikeway and Pedestrian Master Plan • Update the Greenways Master Plan In April 2005, the committee finalized the attached list of recommendations and started an online survey to gauge public opinion about the use of greenways. During the July 21st Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, these recommendations and a summary of the survey results will be presented. If you have any questions or comments about this item prior to the meeting, please feel free to contact me (764.3556 or kfogle @cstx.gov) or Kristan Weaver, Greenways Program Manager (764.3844 or kweaver @cstx.gov). • Bike & Hike Task Force Recommendations April 25, 2005 I. Formation of a Drainage Advisory Board (DAB) • Coordinated by the Greenways Program Manager and staffed through Public Works • Will be a stand -alone Advisory Board, appointed by City Council, for ongoing monthly (or more frequent) meetings to review development requests in the floodplain • The board should be comprised of citizens with interests and expertise that complement the multiple functions of the greenways land use (e.g., hydrology, civil engineering, wildlife ecology, recreation, urban forestry, real estate development, transportation) • Works in concert with the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board and the Planning & Zoning Commission • Would hold joint meetings as needed with the Parks Board (e.g., to address development of trails and other recreational uses in greenways) • Would provide recommendations on greenway dedication, easements or other options and on zoning (see Rec. II below) to the P &Z II. Designation of Greenway Zones within the Existing Greenways Land Use • Greenways would be a zoning designation (i.e. GU, GS, GR) and would be classified as Urban, Suburban, or Rural, with certain allowable and recommended uses in each zoning class • For development requests within these zones, the DAB will review such requests in the context of the entire greenways system, whose primary purpose is to provide a system for stormwater management while also providing for recreation and non - motorized transportation (i.e., trails) • The greenway zone as a system will result in connectivity for efficient storage and transport of stormwater and for non - motorized travel between neighborhoods, schools, parks and commercial centers III. Zero -Rise or No Adverse Impact Management of floodplains • We are working with the City of Bryan to develop uniform drainage design standards and policy which will address the management of floodplains IV. Greenways defined as a "Quality of Life" indicator V. Develop a more effective method of classifying Greenways • Absolve the current greenways priority map as it does not have much practical use as greenways are acquired and /or dedicated not by priority, but as development requests come in • Inventory and map the resources (e.g., hydrology, soils, vegetation, habitat value, cultural /historical attributes, visual quality) within the greenways land use to assist in decision making about zoning and development. VI. Seek input from the development community • Greenway management will be included in the subcommittee on design standards from the Business and Land Development Forum VII. Expand the Greenways definition to include detention areas and incorporate this into the Subdivision Regulations and the Zoning Ordinance VIII. Allow "stacking" to occur within new developments (i.e., if a development meets all standards, allow for similar requirements to be met with one particular plot of land). This would allow developers to use greenways to meet some parkland and detention area requirements. The DAB would be responsible for reviewing the greenways portion of a stacking request. IX. Create a new map online which would act as an interactive map application, but be easy to use and easy to print. X. Create further public outreach opportunities • Conduct public opinion survey on greenways • Publish greenway "blip" on Channel 19 • Distribute greenway information via utility bill inserts • Develop new brochures for distribution at TAMU, CoCS, CVB XI. Include these recommendations in the re -write of the Subdivision Regulations • Include a sub - section on greenways • Insert dedication standards • Insert criteria for acceptance of greenways X. Develop a revised greenways planning document to reflect the updates and changes to policy outlined above. XI. Establish a Bicycle Advisory Committee for CoCS • Review and guide the implementation of the bike and pedestrian master plan • Review capital projects involving a bicycle component • Provide feedback and ideas for the bicycle program • Provide policy guidance on bicycle issues Regular Agenda 7 Presentation, discussion and possible action on a request to re- consider a rezoning within 180 days of denial for 4.7 acres generally located at 1000 Spring Loop from A -P, Administrative- Professional to R -4, Multi - family. Case #05 -107 (TF) c h, 2551 Texas Ave. South Ste. A, College Station, TX 77840 AV Ofc: 979.693.5359 Fax: 979.693.4243 Email; zndgcstx @yahoo.com ittsr 14 July, 2005 Scott Schafer, Chairman . Planning and Zoning Commission C/o Trey Fletcher, AICP, Senior Planner City of College Station - Planning and Development Services 1101 Texas Ave. South College Station, TX 77840 Re: R-4 Rezoning Request for a 4.70 Acre Tract, University Park, Section II, Case No. 05- 00500107, Petition for Rehearing Mr. Schafer: On behalf of our client, River Ridge Townhomes, Ltd., AIton Ofcarzak, Manager, we hereby petition the Planning and Zoning Commission to rehear our R -4 rezoning request for the referenced property. Although in its previous action the commission approved the rezoning, the council denied our request, requiring a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The reasons for our rehearing petition are as follows: 1) There has been a substantial change in circumstances, namely our previous request was not in full compliance with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The council has now approved an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, and our request is in full compliance. 2) New additional information is available, namely that the Comprehensive Plan has been modified, and that with the new information, an R -4 rezoning as is being requested is now fully appropriate. We hope you will consider this petition at your earliest opportunity. Sincerely, MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP /l'. gory . Taggart, RP anagi g Principal, Pro Manager 000292- C.05 (3801) Ed WUL2 : 60 S00Z ST ' I nt 217E17-269-6L6: '0N XUJ dnoao 1N3Wd013nal 1dd I 0 I N(lW : Wald 07/15/2005 11:37 FAX 9796902504 CERTIFIED COPY Z002 ci t. 2551 Texas Ave. South Ste. A, College Station, TX 77840 .� — ii : : , e �P�� Ofc: 979.693.5359 Fax: 979.693.4243 Email: nidgcstx Cr yahoo.com 14 July, 2005 Trey Fletcher, AICP Senior Planner Planning and Development Services City of College Station 1101 Texas Ave. South College Station, TX 77840 Re: Rezoning of 4.70 Acre Tract, University Park, Section. JI, Case No. 05- 00500107 Mr. Fletcher: This letter is authorization for Allyn Taylor, Greg Taggart and Municipal Development Group to prepare and sign applications for rezoning, platting and the variance process, as required, for the above referenced property, which is owned by my limited partnership, River Ridge Townhomes, Ltd.. If you have questions you may contact me at 690 -1504 or 412 -2320. Sincerely, C (i i N J C Alton Ofcarz I . ager River Ridge Townhomes, Ltd. 4060 5 H 6 South College Station, TX 77845 000292- C.04 (3801) CL .. q. to p I, k ,— , F.- , , zr• I- Nt Lr) / e .,-• W ... 0 I 1 Cllico .. * 1 2 rb oe# sc,itilte. .. 0 ILI 0 * 6 e l , At co , 0) A ■"-' e l , ,\‘ ' • ■ 1 , ... ... 4 f-Wq' 41t; co ,,,.,,,''' c).c z= .." • .0 \,.., .)e ■ • ,0,,: ,% — ,., , a .... \ .. ' :OR +#4 . Co ,,,,-- 0 ' v CO._ ,"' • • 0 •.-- . : : 111 .. cv ...." ,` •;*.f c\ c;) N rr, "N# \ . •!.. Lo a CO N N . 0 -. (z) -- e- ..../ aci cVE c\ O co int _ . . , T. tC • ' • 0 •r- it ! •• Ca' .0015. as ' "- • • " .• cn c0 .. e As . ■ .... ,zzu :... : a ° In' i— • • ''''' .v..1 • • • • • • coCi , 4 O —61. ,•-••• • : : : • " " . : : : tC.: . . . ' ' ( 1117 • - .... • : : : ' : : : : ci : : : : .• c\I 0 --7 t., co trh■ " ' r4 &QI o N.. ,- • • .... (53 .... G'4. • • • . itifa . . • . :[::::: a •- c0 a •- 1-. •--- 0) : ' : :. :. :.%,:. i i : ac) 0 1.- C co ;7 0) c .4b 'cs 06 rc5 oo ) 101" it • • • -9: ' • ' .:, ri '117 0 .9-c3 4 P•n o ' - o cv o • • • *° *402 A' %LI '`- • .... 0 : ... ........ t : N.... 0 co j1,.• • o co O . 0 - i " 4.24 r• 0 ..' . . . . c : : : : ' : : : 14I K: . • • : Z .,- cc) 11 OA Nr co CN Al. .... 1. .w... C) ...- 0 1 0 c ) .... .. • " • 0 a inf '''.. Tr . 0 Mao .0 , A 004 0 C) o ,•-- 14.* , :...," , CP - . 1 to o c6 0 c... ar% a co 0 , lo , .. se o 6 0 ,- r), c \ I ° 74 . to ,.. 0 c, ,s .. ." ‘, ... ........, v.„ ... c13 vcc'D g %0) ra v \.y - I.% • • • • • • • • • • • • N co AA" ° • " • • • a ‘0 ' 11 CI r-- • • • rx: . 1..... c \i 0 ') .,..L.tk 0 co I co "--' ° LP 1 '" -- ,..s..411 ' ,- 11. -- - .• criii . : : : . . . .. 1 .... 1 0 7 e■IS.'' : aler 0 N 2 c cs') c., — ' • :1-0- — _ 0 _l (..,, 97. (14..•:..:■40. —I — — 0 0 Y co EWA l 0 2 , co _i ::•• .. sill 6 'I' . 7 w \ .- CO VI . .. 6 COMM \ ' > ii CC LU 1 CO 0 cr, 2 a .. ... j .. i- Z • D 0 ,.,_ OCj co D •-• . 0 EL 2 V CV 05 < Y cm° Y C.) a u) ...., • . P 0 1 0Al l II/14 : ' : LU co r \A 15)7- r • - LU • a ..4- 0 N 1.••• V' • • • 0 Y c 2' La 0 o .1. 0 ' < 0 .::( : • :., .. co • ca it ., • A.: 0 co CO 8 •-- a ----1 CO co -• cOCO .: b .::. < 4 A 2 ger 4 - -' - 4044 ift ' -'-'"''' ' '' ' -,,, \ ' '4- - '..7' mrittia :.. „ -,,*ILIA*416.- - - — .. .,_ ....; "F. 4,,,,Z,.. ,, , -, .',..-i. ., , j ',-,......... ' ' ' ate i 4 , �?«i•. Y i s " . `�' . fi n » 4 { :' y� . . . r . �� • aa ,.. a,, � }� ` p'‘..- � � ` � 9 ,. � �� , • , y € � t � .,.. '- * � � d . : ;� a. < y 1 ",kffi a K'i ' t. - ,ye a I r flit' fi F a ,, In . - .,� $ , n' � ♦ a , °" s .�. lit t al f 41 1 -;‘,44.,;,:'; , mow � � N , f a ii,-,,,,,,•,:,_/,, f---V14_,*it'''' itik +/ �• " '» e1/4. . i fix. P ;1° . ` t • , 1 ,,\ \ '',".' ' ' Vik'rP, ....4%41 4; N\-,447-1;1:;41,--‘,1;4\'' ''. '-' -,W...4.; _, 4111—,. '-'441..: ..'" ' ' ',, 11 '44:, , ' 44 '' 4 ;,, . '''' I r-,-.., - ..."" '?, " '1/4, s. \ ''',;; '.. 3.- 7,1r.,,,,,,....” ",),,, , ,.4.4,44 .-4,7 — clip" . „'',7,,, ......4".., "'� r '. , • ,. t is � ,c• q '!f evwa p '� c ig i Af qt _ , 8 ,.L � t i �g 4 'F 1 €' $ °..' Y µ u E 0- , t Will 6 � � � �rs t ��✓✓ � '�� � . � � � � was �" $ ' O „,t, , ♦ $ ' ,*4 , . : . Y r dam” "' " y # O i t 4, ry , O I tl: .:-''''''f)r-4. - 1 4 -, , , , ,_ \ ., , . °! m �� . ` �l'� I � � a „,-, ,,,,...„ „ •, + € ,ar , ' _ft: ;,..-''. ,,.:*,„ , . 7,P'.., --,,,,,,,;- If: - ' z T,I: . . „ ' '?4”, 4r,'" ,..:::: _ „. 51 - ',-_,,-;!.--" ,..-- ,, a l.- r 1 .vii •»yn IT t o �E i . s ' . � , T.- yr. fl' R � `_ � � .. .q. .+r r , r ,' , ' • ' » 'S ' ` - r , . . _ �, . , � � r 71;11.01V FORD FIIgUSEON CASE NO. rU • DATE SUBMITTED (p I9-0 CITY OE COLLEGE STATION Planning e4 Development Services ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING) FOR PDD / P -MUD ❑ PDD ❑ P -MUD MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shall not be filed within a period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with permission of the Planning & Zoning Commission or /City uncil. The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for consideration: Application completed in full. 1/ $500.00 application fee. ✓ Two (2) copies of a fully dimensioned map on 24" x 36" paper showing: a. Land affected; b. Legal description of area of proposed change; c. Present zoning; d. Zoning classification of all abutting land; and e. All public and private rights -of -way and easem ents bounding and intersecting subj ect land. t/ ✓ Written legal description of subject property (metes & bounds or lot & block of subdivision, whichever is applicable). The attached Rezoning Supporting Information sheet completed in full. Date of Required Preapplication Conference: J( APPLICANT'S INFORMATION: Name(s) 1.4170 (6 "TAGaAie-T / / Street Address cZ 4. S51 ` --4P-, - e' S City (_D1 e Sta+ State Zip Code 7704 E -Mail Address 1 ell CS @ c�� oo. L6v, Phone Number N C,A3 - S3S•9' Fax Number(g7rn 6f3 42 43 PROPERTY DOER'S INFORMATION: / Name(s) UtIC✓ c 15W 01,44 L �° a 41 - V'z4� , 's Street Address 40 6, O Su Ott_ City ag s ti State TY Zip Code 7 kg' E -Mail Address Ltl+Otn. 04 c(t to • CC 1 Phone Number ( t7 t) Fax -(C Fax Number (qt./en co— 2so4 This property was conveyed to owner by deed, dated V ce6c5 P eteice and recorded in Volume Page of the Brazos County Deed Records. / General Location of Property: /Bd 0 912114.40 (ADD C S Address of Property: / l Z • Legal Description: Lots *l — / U- 0 00 Uvc c * R Cec •T Total Acreage: k - c re (S Existing Zoning: 4—F Requested Zoning: rp7 Present Use of Property: kJ/4 )f Proposed Use of Property: COL)G arlc( ettu4 .,, r'�-" � C — QS 6/13/03 Page 1 of 2 REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION 1.) List he changed or cbangi conditi ons in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. (k he - etA.-h.v z vac -{u e -3,F 1,( t., - 11,(0 �'.v P a ( s A e4c cq.-� 0 & s— o oCeve f c 2.) Indicate whether or not this zone c1 ange is in ac with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is, incorrect. u �i' P �Q Ui- -0 { �� S �? Csu�vu -t 1 t "" -l'I.u: Sc e . 3.) List any other reasons to support this zone change. T c S 4. \reel R/14..4-9-e (z 4 Lt;.., C A,Va.Gic✓ '-J 1 'fk Sul r + cr - t u.te t4 Please also provide the following information for PDD rezonings: � rr __ (I_ n_ i l Statement of purpose andjntent of the proposed developm ent: To t utt K L,"t Au A list of proposed land uses: The applicant has prepared this application and supporting information and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correct. IF APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A POWER OF ATTORNEY STATEMENT FROM THE OWNER. I ..... l (e Signature of owner or . . • scant Date p 3 - .e. ,4 , It / 6 214 7 & 6/13/03 Page 2 of 2 MINUTES Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, July 7, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers, College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning 6. Development Services COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman Scott Shafer Commissiors Strong, John Nichols, Dennis Christiansen, Bill Davis and Keil COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Commissioner €Marilyn Haoton. CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Couri#l'an John Happ. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF PR NT: Staff Planners Lindsay Boyer, Jennifer Prochazka, and Molly H td is Senior Planner ' `v y Fletcher, Assistant City Engineer Alan Gibbs, Graduate Civil Enginers C:il' otter and Josh Norton, Assistant Director Lance Simms and Staff Assistant Lisa Lindgren :. OTHER CITY STAFEPRES : : First Assistant City Attorney Roxanne Nemcik and OTIS, Brian 1. Hear Visitors Nositor 2. went Agenda. 2.1 '>_iscussion ancossible action on: `irlinutes — June 22, 2005, Special Meeting 2.2 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for Williams Creek Subdivision, Phase 4, consisting of 25 lots on 35.96 acres, generally located on the south side of Rock Prairie Road, southeast of the intersection of Greens Prairie Road and Rock Prairie Road. Case #05 -97 (JR /CC) 2.3 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Preliminary Plat of the Callaway Subdivision, Phase 2, consisting of 1 lot on 13.799 acres, generally located on the east side of Marion Pugh Drive, approximately 500' south of the intersection of George Bush Drive. Case #05 -94 (JP /AG) P &Z Minutes Regular Agenda 07 -07 -05 Page 1 of 8 2.4 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for Westfield Village Ph. 5 consisting of 35 lots on 11.259 acres generally located south of the future intersection of Newport Lane and Eagle Avenue. Case #05-93 (MH /CC) Commissioner Davis motioned to approve the consent agenda. Commissioner Nichols seconded the motion, motion passed (6 -0). Regular Agenda. 3. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. None 4. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Variance from'SOOtion 8.G.10 Geometric Standards, Street Design Criteria of the Subdivision Regulations_ and presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat:<for Westfield Village Ph ;consisting of 69 lots on 19.644 acres generally located east af<e intersection of Victoria Meio.aeand Eagle Avenue. Case #05 -92 (MH /CC). Molly Hitchcock, Staff Planner, presented the single -sly development stating that it is in compliance with the modified staid rds and conditionapproved with the rezoning. It is also in compliance with the resider` ?density shown on the land use plan and with the preliminary plat approved in April 205: .M . ; Hitchcock `stated that currently there are several lots with frontage on Victoria: or Eagl Streets, which will take access from an alleyway. The applicant requesting avariarce fro e 20 -foot pavement width of the alley to only proy$6:i:ItApt. The pav rent request does meet the standards that are proposed in th <esi giidtnes, which will be considered by City Council in a few weeks. Ms. Hitchcock ` ted that "the Variance isapproved, staff recommended that the plat be approved. Should" be denied, Cinmissioners may continue to act on the plat since the. is to :oinsrastdard and will not affect the layout of the plat. Commissioner iv is mot r d to approve the Variance as requested. Commissioner holds second a motioiti, otion passed (6 -0). Coiiilssioner Reynkls motioned to approve the final plat. Commissioner Davis secondi motion# motion passed (6 -0). 5. Presentation;' and possible action on a Final Plat of the Callaway Subdivision, Phase 2, consisting of 1 lot on 13.799 acres, generally located on the east side of Marion Pugh Drive, approximately 500' south of the intersection of George Bush Drive. Case #05- 95 (JP /AG) Jennifer Prochazka, Staff Planner, presented on the Final Plat for stating that the land use plan designated this property as residential attached, and Marion Pugh is shown as a major collector on the thoroughfare plan. The plat is in compliance with the Subdivision Regulations and staff recommended approval of the Final Plat. Commissioner Nichols motioned to approve the Final Plat. Commissioner Davis seconded the motion, motion passed (6 -0). P &Z Minutes Regular Agenda 07 -07 -05 Page 2 of 8 6. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on: (1) a Variance from Section 8.G.10 Geometric Standards, Street Design Criteria of the Subdivision Regulations; and (2) Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Replat of Bald Prairie Lot 1A; and (3) a Final Plat for Edelweiss Gartens Phase 8, consisting of 46 lots on 23.87 acres, generally located on the west side of Renee Lane, southeast of the extension of Brandenburg Lane, and south of the extension of Eagle Avenue. Case #05-81 (JR/JN) Allen Gibbs, Assistant City Engineer, presented the item stating that the Replat consisted of Lot 1 of Bald Prairie Subdivision and the Final Plat is for Edelweiss Gartens. The Variance request is in reference to the pavement width of the alley. Commissioner Nichols asked if the Fire Marshall had con rns r g rding the access to these properties, that if they had access to the front that th0vould . flotiipeed access to the back part of the properties. Mr. Gibbs stated that was correct. Commissioner Davis motioned to approvelo*voAhtv. Commissioner Nichols seconded the motion, motion passed (6-0). Steve Brock, 2716 Barron Road, C e Station, Texas. ` 1 . Brock states that he received the notice of the public hearing .ind did not know wh it< i : <. as for so he just wanted clarification. Mr. Gibbs stated tktere was an apved Prelirnary Plat which included multiple phases, includingliase'8 >`ibbs review other parts of the Master Plan that had already been construe <so that MiBrock would have a better understanding. Gibbs stated that Phase 8 is actuall a partial *plat of the Bal tairie Subdivision that is the reason Phase 8 is both a Replat and= n. I 1ht. Clarificati' in regarding the notification area was also given. StgWArdeiVi:**loper,'44ted that he would be happy to answer any questions. No one questions Cissioner Niels motioned to approve the Replat of Bald Prairie and the Final Plat ' :. E delweiss (*tens Phase 8. Commissioner Davis seconded the motion, motion :.:'.. :ed 6 - ; 7. Public hearineteggentafion, discussion, and possible action on a Rezoning for 76.662 acres out of the Robert Stevenson Survey, A -54, generally located on the proposed State Highway 40, across from Castlegate from R -1 Single Family Residential and A -O Agricultural Open to PDD Planned Development District. Case #05 -68 (MH /CC) Molly Hitchcock, Staff Planner, presented the Rezoning stating that staff recommended approval. The subject property is located in the Crowley tract across from Castlegate near future State Highway 40 and is currently undeveloped. The land use plan shows the property as single -family residential medium density. The applicant requested PDD to create a residential development similar to Castlegate. The requested land uses are single family, public park, and common areas consisting of open space, landscaped areas and buffers. P &Z Minutes Regular Agenda 07 -07 -05 Page 3 of 8 Commissioner Davis asked if the flood plain area was identified and if it would be dedicated to the City. Ms. Hitchcock stated that the applicant was present and could speak more about the conversations with Kristan Weaver, Greenways Manager. Ms. Hitchcock stated that in conversations she had with Ms. Weaver she stated that the area outside of the requested area was what was discussed, the area outside of the PDD request. Commissioner Nichols asked if the PDD was used in other parts of Castlegate on the other side. Ms. Hitchcock stated that was correct and that it had the sat urpose and intent. Joe Schultz, 3208 Ensbrook, College Station, Texas. ' lr. Schultz stated that he was the applicant's engineer for the project. He stated that t :; Core of Engir j ers area to the left and the Navasota's Ladies Tresses' area to the East sically include 99% the floodplain. Mr. Schultz stated that what the Commission is b.g asked to rezone only haeiinor sliver's of floodplain that back up into it. Mr. CrowWifill owns that. property and he` ah'e individual dealing with the City. Mr. Wallace has purchaser *. pr S'erty that is to be<:rezoned, so the greenways discussion is between Mr. Crowley and tety. Commissioner Davis motionedto.. approve the<'rczoning request to PDD. Commissioner Reynolds seconded J the otion, motion i (6 -0). 8. Public hearing, presentation, discussiort;:and on a Replat of Lot 6, Block 2 of the Autumn Chase S l division, consisting>of 19 lots' rid 2 common areas on 5.64 acres, generally located; estofinell Drive between Brentwood Drive and Manuel Drive. Case #05-85 (JP /C_ Jennifer Prochazka`1ff Piiers , the Replat stating that approval of the replat will rel to ultiple p b is utiliif within the plat that were dedicated with the original plat. Cu ently there :: are no utilities in those easements and all of the franchises and #ty departments`ha e appro the:>relocation. The land use plan in this area designates the tOperty as resider high den ity and Cornell Drive is shown as a major collector on the thoroughfare plan. ` replat is in compliance with all subdivision regulations and staff recommended approve Commissioner Nichols asked for clarification regarding the number of entrances into the loop. Mr. Nic o asked if the number of lots on that loop were within the guidelines. He also asked if there was adequate parking off the streets for the number of cars to be expected in that area. Ms. Prochazka stated that the number of lots on the loop were within the guidelines and that each duplex will have to provide a site plan to show where their parking spaces are and each triplex and fourplex will have to meet all multi - family commercial site plan requirements including parking spaces. Joel Mitchell, Mitchell & Morgan, 511 University Drive, College Station, Texas. Mr. Mitchell stated that all duplexes have parking off street in the rear and all the fourplexes have garages. P &Z Minutes Regular Agenda 07 -07 -05 Page 4 of 8 David & Sylvia Robinson, 2317A Texas Avenue South, College Station, Texas. Mrs. Robinson stated that they had concerns about part of their property being accessed into the project. Mrs. Robinson stated that they have had so many problems with the ongoing development around them and that the hotel is right in front of them and that they have had problems with access, which is guaranteed by the City. Other problems they have had are that the utilities have been cut off numerous times during development and their utilities have been moved several times. Basically the concerns they have are access, traffic, parking and fencing. Mrs. Robinson stated that they just want to know what is going to be built here in front of their property. Mr. Mitchell stated that lots 7 and 8 are fourplex lots, so there, parking in the rear of those lots. He also stated that there will be fencing and. th requirements of the City will be met. Mr. Mitchell stated that the sewer and water are*tnitiiip, off of different locations so that the Robinson's should not be affected. Commissioner Davis motioned to approve the.plat of lot 6 block 2 `r if the Autumn Chase Subdivision as presented. Commissioner Christiansen seconded the mo , passed (6 -0). 9. Public hearing, presentation, discussion and posslble:action on a Comprehensive Plan Amendment by amending the Lxld Use Plan for 109,, Spring Loop and vicinity. The proposed area is bound by Spring SprinttOpp, University Dn e East and Tarrow Street. The proposed land use plan classificatioACIfitkka Attached, Office and Regional Retail from a combinatn of°i#e.- ,family Residential High Density, Office and Regional Retail. Case #05 -77 (T Trey Fletcher, S for Planer, presented the Comprehensive Plan Amendment application that was filed tql0iidenied rezoning request from A -P to R -4 earlier this year. Mr. Fletcher stated that'e,istingIand uses in the primarily of commercial and office uses. Commercial [` e ; _;Ir > c ::evenly s_p.lit between retail and office uses. Mr. Fletcher stated::: is aulti familf e s o cc r oz < hoth s ides of Spring rin Loop, and the predominant y.:: >:::: »:. /u ng' categc r j xhe are s - as well as A -P and some R -4. Proposed changes on the m id use plan are'ttOkiTexas . \&M System property from a combination of single- family high as well as renal reta into office, The greenway is unchanged. On the subject prstety the request tik4t generated this application goes from single - family high density and regioi' retail to residtial attached, and then, on either side of that subject property is some foiiiikxes and that goes from single- family high density to residential attached. Spring Loop is classt &d as , i' major collector on the thoroughfare plan as a volume range of 5,000 to 10,000 vehictps per day. Based on recent traffic counts, Spring Loop currently carries about 8,000 trips`' According to the proposed land use plan, the residential attached land use area could accommodate up to 175 units, 76 of which currently exist. Using common trip generation rates the amended plan would potentially result in approximately 650 additional trips per day based on the new dwelling units. When considering that some of these trips would be accommodated by Texas A&M transit service the total traffic on Spring Loop would be about 8,600 vehicles per day. Mr. Fletcher recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment as presented. Commissioner Christiansen asked if there were any proposed improvements to Spring Loop. Mr. Fletcher stated that there are no improvements scheduled. P &Z Minutes Regular Agenda 07 -07 -05 Page 5 of 8 Commissioner Davis asked for clarification regarding the logic of changing from regional retail to residential attached. Mr. Fletcher stated that the tract, as it is platted now, does have access to University Drive through a series of access easements through private property to that location. When the original zoning request was proposed and recommended for by the Commission, there was a condition that the access easements be abandoned through the replatting of that property into one lot. Mr. Fletcher stated that as the uses currently stand and the way the platted lots are accessed easements are required. It is staff's prospective that. the front portions of all the properties on University Drive are developed and buzlditig "ii.ut at the present time, the visibility of this area from University Drive is hindered ,:;:well as the access is hindered, unless someone is familiar with that area. The uses at e'' fr€ is between the property and University Drive are primarily office uses as opposed "to high ft, generating retail uses. This tract also has access to Spring Loop, unlike anyipf the other n - residential properties in the area and it was more appropriate for a residential c omponent. Greg Taggart, Municipal Development G.ro'ollege Station, Texas. Mr`':`ggart stated that this Commission previously approved this sit as an : ' -4 :,.. He also stated that they will be building a bus stop /passenger shelter for the area:::;; Commissioner Nichols motioned w approve the C oi* 3 ehensive Plan Amendment. Commissioner Reynolds seconded th w o t ion, motion paez1(6 -0). 10. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and` posy action on a Replat for the Willow Branch & Oakwoodools Plat consistng 'of 2 of 1otiY` >an approximately 19 acres generally located at the int€ ection Anderson and Bush Drive. Case #05 -99 (LB /JN) Lindsay Boyer, Rat Planner =:presented the itiff stating that the Replat would create a new lof of 1.46 acres at tle. .An erof:derson and George Bush Drive. The Replat is in com ,li : th. the suh ision re` ' t s. Ms. Boyer stated that the Comprehensive Land ..: Uae PIan shows . area a h stitutional and the Thoroughfare Plan shows that George Bush Drive as a major'a*rial an&AftdPrson as a major collector. The property is zoned R -1 and :'•'h s. been since 19 Beer recommended approval of the request and stated that sever phone calls hadbeen received. One call was in opposition of the Replat because the indivd:l:helieved that[e property would best be served as Regional Retail. Margaret Log , olf Run, College Station, Texas. Ms. Log stated that she was present as a representatkka the Homeowners Association. She asked what the actual result on the ground would be for the Replatting. Ms. Log asked if any access would be changed on Anderson. Ms. Boyer stated that a property line will be created in order to create a lot for the Justice of the Peace property. She also mentioned that access will not be changed. Commissioner Davis motioned for approval of the Replat. Commissioner Strong seconded the motion, motion passed (6 -0). 11. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on variances from Section 13 -B Streets, Section 13 -C Lot Width, and Section 12-J.2.1 Utility Layout of the Subdivision Regulations for P &Z Minutes Regular Agenda 07 -07 -05 Page 6 of 8 Indian Lakes Phase IX, and presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for Indian Lakes Phase IX consisting of 42 lots on 14.65 acres generally located southeast of the intersection of Indian Lakes Drive and Arapaho Ridge Drive. Case #05 -83 (MH /AG) Molly Hitchcock, Staff Planner, presented the Variances for Indian Lakes stating that the proposal was for a single - family, gated development which would be considerably denser than what has already been developed. Ms. Hitchcock stated that the Developers were requesting variances so that they can build to the rural standard but still provide the smaller lots. The variances needed are to the urban rural street section, which includes right of way width, shoulder width and crown design for drainage, lot width ; : nd easement location. Ms. Hitchcock stated that if the variances are approved recommends the plat be approved. Commissioner Davis asked for clarifications regardiri s ewer. Alan Gibbs, Assistant City Engineer, stated a sewer treatment plarti, be. pe`r The sewer plant will have to meet all stat nitting requirements and a :Mate approved operator. These permits would need to be requit4befAtiethg Final Plat comes before the Commission for consideration. Commissioner Nichols asked fpecifics on the <' ances regarding the current requirements as if the property would be th the city Mr. Gibbs stated that there would bea prosedet: The first section is the width of the right -at .ay, applicant 448-foot right -of -way section and the Subdivision Regulations ' `t : fires 70 -feet for rural. The second item is that there are not shoulders anditthe rural section and also ate. open ditch. Mr. Gibbs stated that the 10 -foot shoulders are wlatsre typically used for the rodside ditches. i is h development `' X lair Hart stated that the Paul �: E. 2 '$,,treet` > << >> €: 'ire as designed to beted anvate community, the streets are private and it will be privately ;; :maintained. Mr. `H stated ; t. there will be trails and walkways within the development. ` ` ttt Hart stated that e coma i tty is intended for retirees but anyone could live there. He statea'that the water d#ns towards Lake Arapaho and there will be strategic points in place to taktlae. water to thiake. Mr. Hart stated that there will be two strategic places for guest parking aiat all the'I'omes are designed to have two cars in the drive way and two on the street. Commissioner Davis asked for clarification regarding the sewer and water lines being under the pavement. He also asked if the cost for maintenance will all belong to the homeowners. Mr. Hart stated that all the expense for maintenance of the development will belong to the homeowners, that the development is a home owners association within a home owners association. Mike McClure 9262 Brookwater Circle, College Station, Texas. Mr. McClure stated that there will be a storm drain underground that will take the surface water off when it becomes excessive. P &Z Minutes Regular Agenda 07 -07 -05 Page 7 of 8 Commissioner Nichols motioned to approve all three variances, Section 13 -B Streets, Section 13-C Lot Width, and Section 12 4.2.1 Utility Layout of the Subdivision Regulations. Commissioner Christiansen seconded the motion, motion passed (6 -0). Commissioner Reynolds motioned to approve the plat as submitted. Commissioner Davis seconded the motion, motion passed (6 -0). 12. Adjourn. Commissioner Davis motioned to adjourn. Commissione,Nichols seconded the motion, motion passed (6 -0). Approved: Scott Shafer, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Attest: Lisa Lindgren aff Assist t Planning and De & pment Services P &Z Minutes Regular Agenda 07 -07 -05 Page 8 of 8 Consent Agenda 3.2 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for the Cove of Nantucket Subdivision, consisting of 68 lots and 4 common areas on 17.81 acres, generally located along the west side of State Highway 6, south of the intersection of State Highway 6 and Nantucket Drive. Case #05 -108 (JP) STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Jennifer Prochazka, Planner Report Date: July 11, 2005 Email: jprochazka @cstx.gov Meeting Date: July 21, 2005 Item: Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for the Cove of Nantucket Subdivision, consisting of 68 lots and 4 common areas on 17.81 acres, generally located along the west side of State Highway 6, south of the intersection of State Highway 6 and Nantucket Drive. Applicant: Veronica Morgan, Mitchell & Morgan, Representative for Don Morris, Property Owner Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat as submitted. Item Summary: This item is for consideration of a Final Plat for an R -1 Single - Family Residential development of just under 18 acres. This plat has been developed under the regulations in Section 8.3 of the UDO, which governs cluster developments. Under the cluster development regulations, smaller lot sizes are permitted, but are required to be offset by a corresponding increase in open space. The average lot size within this development exceeds the 5,000 square foot minimum for the R -1 Single - Family Residential zoning district, however, several open spaces totaling 1.88 acres are still proposed. This plat also includes the proposed dedication of 3.71 acres of parkland along State Highway 6. At the time of Preliminary Plat approval, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted a variance to Section 8 -G.6 of the Subdivision Regulations, which requires that a cul -de -sac not have more than twenty -four Tots. Block 2 is shown to have 38 lots. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Final Plat is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. The Land Use Plan shows the subject property and surrounding area as Single - Family Medium Density. The property abuts State Highway 6, a Freeway on the Thoroughfare Plan. With the variance granted by the Planning & Zoning Commission, the plat is in compliance with the Subdivision Regulations. Item Background: The subject property was annexed into the City in 1996 and zoned A -O Agricultural Open at that time. The property was rezoned to R -1 Single - Family Residential in 1997, then rezoned to PDD -H Planned Development District - Housing, later that same year. Because no further development action was pursued on the property, the PDD -H zoning expired and the zoning reverted back to R -1 Single Family Residential. Budgetary & Financial Summary: N/A Related Advisory Board Recommendations: The Parks Board recommended approval of the land dedication, as shown on the plat. Commission Action Options: The Commission has final authority over the Final Plat. The options are: • Approval • Denial Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Application 4. Copy of Final Plat J QQ Z _7 L a 0 o iii cc) co �Py60 CO P ' 5' • w D I -- Z Q 0 /4 ���-l� P I P�e N O ���``` ° � W Lit N T I Aiyf I 111 1 _ _ U N ` �J " -'`� OG` O O U 9 � a,�i 9, N N 4 co - GJ _ w ((t�o M* ::�INERS W k - Z t _ B1 OG�. 12 O O Q. J r N m W a� J Y d y O vi , Q ~ �,�" G , U" , V d� j r �;.''iI SNP �� o v LJJ A` t Z S CR`M Z .vF4Ch I` o ' F- - Q _ . 75- litkArtA uZ 7 f MI o" VA r � � 3 � � "` '"� - x - Q w� � � � sz7 � � �'' �> t �.,,+ £ Vie.. � ° � Y � fi t,; � � ° "� ' � . •t. , " �' ay K ' _ - 1 _'. � �f „ilc. ' v...- ,'�' "� 4 �. � �`r'*l6 ^�:�' �`:d �, ,8 �'� �� b .� A ' � .� ;�5`� p+ �$_. A . r ..� �' -y ��� :�5 ,� � � j � ' � I � 2� . lam. �" r � ,s E T e � : if , ; x '.5� h d'� 1� t,,. 4i� - °' � 1 �' ' .. g w <'� �s '.rz- .r` i .t'g '.fir � � Y � +� ' � �� 3 � .�',. �y� +d' - ?R � E,�. r � § � �`� � is �� .^ J � i � '� '�' �:� �`�'m r .* •r � .,�d'� ° ,.y `� �`* �' � + '�" "et,� �'" •° �r�� .7�'�Y "� ��. `� � � .m �' � �"�. � � � ` �, i4 � r �t a:. ,�ck° 'a� x* � � • ,. g'r ' * ��`ue � � I � .a��� � #, �� �" 't r t ". ,� r � ` ter. � ,�� �,� ^ ' 4` � �� s. y � �� 8� �„+ily �� �, �'' � '�� V Y �'F 'S� a� .Pct 6.E �' � � ry W1 � ° t �� � ' a § �� 5 ro � , . � "� � � ~ a�� �.. ,. � � ate ' �t � -' � � � 5 A � +.�* + - r s �' = "x � r :o � � a i'= � � " �." ..fit - � '•/�' .9 .: Y` ff d ,-' + g „ �� , „�,� '�` ,�' � 4. fir,,. i "� U { ��.s t. �,'�+t .s�'"�''� y �� ,� ,i�.••�,s -%^�� � �?a+� � � a tg � � � # � �� �� a� �' '6 a t pn >I� � ' Y �' 8 #.,` �t $ 4. .p k�a �, �'. .,4Vj�', � °1 �.� °�„� 'r". g. a�w ,, r��'�z'r_ �;. . r.i.<F.� �. �. �s s, � �i t 'F �� �'�d � .r �d °'� � � t y, ° � �� s� p ; P ,P_ , °� � � r,"r °� �,�' O '. s p °_� � 4, a. }�� i s g` _�," . ,.r r�� S `� y �s t � '�' J Pa �.,�" ���r� � � �, �k. gam ,y�` (� %r � y�w ,p'� -'� �y.Rf t !� �'y ,} � � ��� �+ �: " � 4 � 1 p.'.7 . � x, _ p � �, t+ '� ^ a �`.�,� r+ ...�" .. �' �. a �.; � - �* k e � � y+ ` .: ,� ,�. .. � fi t' > ...i �� .� � �� � ,.. re :. � y � ,} °- "'� r� . A �' ,.�� p.. f1. / � � r i 4' � ` � {F aD � �� �` � � '�„�(r b 3 �^ ,� 'A � fi�F. �; f,� .... �i �: �� � ,�g � � p .� ,, �_ �. . � �� � �'� �� k ��" '� C� � � � S � z . , � , Y d =� �"�y' �" 'd + � �� � 3 tea__ ,°.*�r'e - `v�1k♦ � �: �� t �, � U * a �a ` -� ^#� S �,� �`�� � � � � �.':' ;t' �°r � ��" ,�` « � 1 a K ° +rte �.�� W i' � s�y -� � s ' s _. � ta< y R`� �'�° �Y� N a J '• .: ♦ ��` _� r �, `'� ; � aa1 �yft,�J�'�e :a j �, i�� �'i.�� i .P�� °, y,.,� q 'k +9�� . � �.�''::.. ,p ; .;�, `'t. y �" `J t Y� � Rif 1R � � R �. u � � � � �`"`� �" . FP y /� . +S�t z � . a � i a �. : r ' �` x k � � `1 µ }" him � �e i � 6 wP -n` � � F➢ � �� ��`� i �� ��- r � • � '' �,r L � i ?'a'8 ..i,.. .��*�sa 1r 111FFFiii �'¥ b � #. � � '. �s .� � �b `��fi, �,'� _•';� LL ' ,. +�"s � `�; � � � r�" ��, !C� .�"v`. � �� ., � w � { - ��' v 4 air "� : „�, � 'F ,,,}� �� �— �� s ,�" x �.. �� "� r � �,; � b �� a ' °l y �+� `r � #: 't` ,�. y� � �'�� ' � �l3a �`��, A �� w .1' _,�. 3 � � �;, it .� � �. -r { - � V it y � a� r y :. .:" . a' 8 r i'^e, `� ���i * ,.� � � � *�,`�" j�a � � ,� � �� y - "t'+4ylE° _ � �, s + III � '�!'"i, s Rte , a3� �,��. r s"� �f e „�` y�" ^� 111 � .1, � � .a ,� � � � � ' �+ 1�' ��� �:.� J y y ,. ., ¢y * iF'+3 ,�" �� r 4 a1 M : � T r ! � "�;lt p ��{,'�" �i ''" r ;� � *` X ' r ° - �i �. a�. '. �;.'� z ( `� 4FP:: � fi 7r�� M � { � ..�� �s;. � s } . ,,,,,�w �+��'• � ,� ,� � ��' O \ �'» � . r � ' ♦. � � t- '�+�P" �1 �� r � � 1 �ryi� nY `£� -° Q:; . � 8 1w' 1, .�W !' E ' l� YY 1 � � x' �_ � ,' a. .� � W` i ? rt "e' ,er ,s a ,..,� � r � � �'!F �;a ... �y .. �,�. r a ,� ,,.,s ,,� d �, � � � `. '" 'Jx• {'��;�� 3 #,�.� f� 4 � ` � t A r � { '. � � .ws , � 0 7 ..,fit ;: v 1 � '} ra, v '�s fj � �.a $ x�, ;. �' y . '.. rri'��� �� � � ` P Ar' l y i "`�. '"� � � j' ': ` ° tom. i . -� �� � ,rtj . ., . .. s . . ;. �� � 4 �,; .�� 10 t- V" v FOR OFFICE USE ONLY " J Aki P8Z CASE NO.: 0 5 - V05 (irff" � DATE SUBMITTED: - OZO - 05 - —ITY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning & Development Services FINAL PLAT APPLICATION (Check one) ❑ Minor ❑ Amending ® Final ❑ Vacating ❑ Replat ($300.00) ($300.00) ($400.00) ($400.00) ($600.00)• *Includes public hearing fee The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P&Z Commission consideration. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: L X Filing Fee (see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets - $55.00 per additional sheet t/ N/A Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations — $100 (if applicable) Development Permit Application Fee of $200.00 (if applicable). re vto� ly s�ton�� ?C tJ9 �° Infrastructure Inspection Fee of $600.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed) Application completed in full. N/A Copy of original deed restrictions /covenants for replats (if applicable). X Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.) t/ X One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and /or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable). / X Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. 4/ X A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. X Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable). Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of approval (if applicable). Date of Preapplication Conference: Co NAME OF SUBDIVISION The Cove of Nantucket 5 5 0000 ( -0003- co s I SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot & Block) West of SH6; South of South Hampton Subdivision APPLICANT /PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): Name: Veronica Morgan Street Address: 511 University Dr. East, Suite 204 City: College Station State: TX Zip Code: 77840 E -Mail Address: v@mitchellandmorgan.com Phone Number (979) 2604963 Fax Number: (979) 2604963 -- Om - 2,1,b PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: loo Name: Don Morris Street Address: 1445 North Loop West City: Houston State: TX Zip Code: 77008 E - Mail Address Phone Number: (713) 802 -9292 Fax Number (713) 802 -1655 .CHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name: Same as Applicant Street Address City &ACP UM (>140 State Zip Code - E -Mail Address Phone Number Fax Number \-\00,_ phyus 0 /4yiks, ?Kiz- 00c). _6 . c ( 0 (12 Regular Agenda 4 Consideration, discussion and possible action on request(s) for absence from meetings. Marilyn Hooton — July 7, 2005, Meeting Bill Davis — July 21, 2005, Meeting Bill Davis — July 22, 2005, Joint Meeting w /Bryan P &Z Lisa Lindgren - P & Z Page 1 From: <MjhootonCpaol.com> To: <Llindgren ©cstx.gov> Date: 7/2/2005 5:49:59 PM Subject: P & Z Lisa, July 7 I will be out of town and will be absent at P & Z. Do you know what I need to do about getting reservation to the Texas Transportation Summit In Irving August 9 - 12 at the Omni Mandalay Hotel at Las Colinas? I would likd very much to attend this summit. Thank you, Have a good weekend and 4th. Marilyn City of College Station Absence Request Form For Elected and Appointed Officers Name: I� /) ba-v Request Submitted on: (11 /40 I& I will not be in attendance at the meeting of: JD ly a J � c:Rad Jo I y a d 00,5 for the reason(s) specified: (Date) :En 0 On 80.5; i& JPAti "fria4:1 attort (Signature) 4' (Aim( 4/tet This request shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board one -week prior to meeting date.