HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/07/2005 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning Commission Grffis-4, FILE copy
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Planning 6. Development Services
AGENDA
Workshop Meeting
Planning and Zoning Commission
Thursday, July 7, 2005, at 6:00 p.m.
Administrative Conference Room,
City Hall
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas
1. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items.
2, Discussion of minor and amending plats approved by Staff.
05 -91 Bald Prairie Subdivision 0P)
05 -98 Graham Corner Plaza (TF)
3. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the P &Z Plan of Work.
4. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the status of the draft Subdivision
Regulations.
5. Presentation, Discussion and possible action regarding the P &Z Calendar of Upcoming
Meetings
TBA Joint Meeting of Bryan and College Station Planning & Zoning
Commissions, at Bryan City Hall
6. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning and Zoning Member
may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific
factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall
be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
7. Adjourn
Consultation with Attorney {Gov't Code Section 551.0711 ; possible action.
The Planning and Zoning Commission may seek advice from its attorney regarding a pending and contemplated
litigation subject or attorney -client privileged information. After executive session discussion, any final action or vote
taken will be in public. If litigation or attorney -client privileged information issues arise as to the posted subject matter
of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, an executive session will he held.
This building is wheelchair accessible. 1Iandicapped parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive
service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call 979- 764 -3517 or (TDD) 1- 800 -735-
2989. Agendas posted on Internet Website http: / /www.cstx.gov and Cable Access Channel 19.
in
0
0
N
O
■
CO
LL
ty-4,;illiketti z M in
S a• N
d
O
O VI
0
{.` U
G
N a
Q to w a a4 c$
C6 H a r
> > 0
4-, , . >
�o 4.> +_,
0
o <
<
< O,
FBI 74 y ^ y 4 o
0 U QQ c . r� ¢� Q �)
a�
.� x
tar a - (3. Q . — ° '+�
cf) ----rt. . '• '. : , U . O N , p <1 G U C} O .,N
\.J ' .. it � ¢, s-. ty r s� 4 yti
Y Y Y i� Y
, ', ` ,< .0 U 0 V y > 0 V TS ii i
0 t ` O O O O 'O p O O � p
p U 3 U U U 3 U $.-. o
't-+� 2y j 5 C
o
• 0 4 `4 * wa d "� 4 *'*t $ N
o "` N it) N (1) � � a3 �
"3 0 -`�
0 ct o
c p m o
o a4 o T:',
o
0
�,`` t U •� 3 /�/ 0 � Li-, � ; 9 L `,. . "' `L V as 'rte L+" CCS O cl
o 4 �1 n 4 ^ �„ ,1 ,, �2" ' • ate-+ ✓ O " .O � _
w l ry O '- � tL . a 0 -` .� -
a z€ -' N M i] .1.
N Q C � 00
In
0
o
tr:16, ,7,-.A.:16, v . )
o
° o
,.7`! �:
ca
a)
4 i#'SCf
G Q.
}
f 1 {
F
O
O
d
ti
v
r ,' Tv
Q.
O
U
v v v
.. o > o o
o
CD
' *" "... 4 v cn S v rn 1.)
up ' fG0- • v � : C s
p 0 -. p 0 I 0 •
p - y a v °) v a; a' a E v 0 0 v + •
O t , O O 0 .O v p y v 0
- � v cn y v N ._,
�?Q 0- C/1 a �bA v 'tf Cn v CL) d cn N S W q i
� 0 °. " i 4 1 >, v m > v - v
�y ` t v v v v v v Y v v b v
g% v O Q fl O v � Q , . � O . U O
L�� .sib
— i� .vr f Cry
0
v a
41 c p . , V
4
{ . F p . . " i) 'd bQ O
0 I.i
r �t N LL.) V N
��� e
?. .}-'� , t-,-c.,%, . s--, c�•• \1
ct
c $' N v v v (CS
U Q Q Q
•
LO
0
rteltitI o
zM CV
'
s O O c
O O Q
It.,-.4';,:ri..,ti...:41.k.v.R;4::4 N �
� y LL.
RI
d a >
cn
1. • Q • .- 0
.r M
0
N ::::: ' : ., ' AltE: -. 1 .' ::: : , .
d ti a
`` v �
O v
A 0,
O ' U cc U
d
4-
:-=-- _0 )
. E ♦ Y CL } } ma y { r , ^ � 'l ' h FF�r �+{1l{
CCU 0
O
t: s
a "
N
b
CCU ` c xu k c . ) Cam 0 0 �
‘"" ,„ x } , a s " v Y b.13 1 N
� �' 3 :�- O O O
rt v cip
I � , � { i t ` x 4 } O M ("� v r .+ Q • � U "3 U . U 0
44
a o
v a>, Q o w �g 0 3
b
' .- .. N g C ch < C` ? , -+ c a d N U M
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Planning er Development Services
AGENDA
Regular Meeting
Planning and Zoning Commission
Thursday, July 7, 2005, at 7:00 p.m.
Council Chambers, College Station City Hall
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas
1. Hear Citizens. At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address
the Commission on planning and zoning issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The
citizen presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes
to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The
Commission will receive the infor nation, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the
matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your
name and address for the record.)
All matters listed under Item 2, Consent <lgenda, are considered routine by the Planning and Zoning Commission
and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary and limit plats, where staff has found compliance
with all minimum subdivision resulations. .-111 ite,,is approved by Consent are approved n'ith any and all skiff
recommendations. There will not be separate discussion of these items. If any (Cornet ssioner desires to discuss an item
on the Consent Agenda it will be moved to the Regular 1jgenda for f erther consideration.
2. Consent Agenda.
2.1 Discussion and possible action on:
Minutes — June 22, 2005, Special Meeting
2.2 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for Williams Creek
Subdivision, Phase 4, consisting of 25 lots on 35.96 acres, generally located on the
south side of Rock Prairie Road, southeast of the intersection of Greens Prairie Road
and Rock Prairie Road. Case #05 - (JR /CC)
2.3 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Preliminary Plat of the Callaway
Subdivision, Phase 2, consisting of 1 lot on 13.799 acres, generally located on the
east side of Marion Pugh Drive, approximately 500' south of the intersection of
George Bush Drive. Case #05 -94 (JP /AG)
2.4 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for Westfield Village Ph.
5 consisting of 35 lots on 11.259 acres generally located south of the future
intersection of Newport Lane and Eagle Avenue. Case #05 -93 (MH /CC)
Regular Agenda.
3. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda
by Commission action.
4. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Variance from Section 8.G.10 Geometric
Standards, Street Design Criteria of the Subdivision Regulations; and presentation,
discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for Westfield Village Ph. 4 consisting of 69
lots on 19.644 acres generally located east of the intersection of Victoria Avenue and Eagle
Avenue. Case #05 - 92 (MH /CC).
5. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat of the Callaway Subdivision,
Phase 2, consisting of 1 lot on 13.799 acres, generally located on the east side of Marion
Pugh Drive, approximately 500' south of the intersection of George Bush Drive. Case #05-
95 (JP /AG)
6. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on: (1) a Variance from Section 8.G.10
Geometric Standards, Street Design Criteria of the Subdivision Regulations; and (2) Public
Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Replat of Bald Prairie Lot 1A;
and (3) a Final Plat for Edelweiss Gartens Phase 8, consisting of 46 lots on 23.87 acres,
generally located on the west side of Renee Lane, southeast of the extension of Brandenburg
Lane, and south of the extension of Eagle Avenue. Case #05 -81 (JR /JN)
7. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Rezoning for 76.662 acres
out of the Robert Stevenson Survey, A -54, generally located on the proposed State Highway
40, across from Castlegate from R -1 Single Family Residential and A -O Agricultural Open to
PDD Planned Development District. Case #05 - (MH /CC)
8. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Replat of Lot 6, Block 2 of
the Autumn Chase Subdivision, consisting of 19 lots and 2 common areas on 5.64 acres,
generally located west of Cornell Drive between Brentwood Drive and Manuel Drive. Case
#05 - 85 (JP /CC)
9. Public hearing, presentation, discussion and possible action on a Comprehensive Plan
Amendment by amending the Land Use Plan for 1000 Spring Loop and vicinity. The
proposed area is bound by Spring Loop, University Drive East and Tarrow Street. The
proposed land use plan classifications include a combination of Residential Attached, Office
and Regional Retail from a combination of Single - family Residential High Density, Office
and Regional Retail. Case #05 - (TF)
10. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Replat for the Willow
Branch & Oakwood Schools Plat consisting of 2 of lots on approximately 19 acres generally
located at the intersection of Anderson and George Bush Drive. Case #05 - (LB /JN)
11. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on variances from Section 13-B Streets, Section
13-C Lot Width, and Section 12-12.1 Utility Layout of the Subdivision Regulations for
Indian 1 akes Phase IX and presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Preliminary
Plat for Indian Lakes Phase IX consisting of 42 lots on 14.65 acres generally located
southeast of the intersection of Indian Lakes Drive and Arapaho Ridge Drive. Case #05
(MH/AG)
12. Adjourn.
Consultation with Attorney {Gov't Code Section 551.071} : possible action.
The Planning and Zoning Commission may seek advce from its attorney regarding a pending and contemplated litigation
subject or attorney-client privileged information. After executive session discussion, any final action or vote taken will be
in public. If litigation or attorney-client privileged information issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this Planning
and Zoning Commission meeting, an executve session will be held.
This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicapped parking spaces are available. Any request for sigri interpretive service
must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call 979-764-3517 or (TDD) 1'800'735'2e89.
Agendas ued on Internet Website http://www.cstx.qov and Cable Access Channel 19.
Consent Agenda 2.1
Discussion and possible action on:
Minutes — June 22, 2005, Special
Meeting
MINUTES
Regular Meeting
Planning and Zoning Commission
Wednesday, June 22, 2005, at 11:30 a.m.
Council Chambers, College Station City Hall
1101 Texas Avenue
4-ir" College Station, Texas
CITY OF COLLEGE STAFION
Planning & Development Services
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman Shafer, Commissioners Davis, Hooton, Fedora
and Reynolds.
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Commissioner Nichols.
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilman Ben White.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF PRESENT: Staff Planners Jennifer Prochazka,
Molly Hitchcock and Lindsay Boyer, Senior Planner Trey Fletcher, Director Joey Dunn, Assistant
City Engineer <\lan Gibbs, Graduate Civil Engineers Carol Cotter and josh Norton, Assistant
Director Lance Simms, Planning Intern Crissy Hartl, Customer Service Representative Gina
Southerland and Staff Assistant Lisa Lindgren.
OTHER CITY STAFF PRESENT: First Assistant City Attorney Roxanne Nemcik and
OTIS, Brian Cooke.
1. Hear Visitors
No visitors spoke.
2. Consent Agenda
2.1 Discussion and possible action on:
Minutes - May 17, 2005, Workshop Meeting
Minutes May 19, 2005, Workshop Meeting
Minutes — May 19, 2005, Regular Meeting
2.2 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for the Castlegate
Subdivision, Phase 6 consisting of 23 lots on 11.142 acres generally located at on
Green's Prairie Road west of Castlegate Drive. Case #05 - (JR /CC)
2.3 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for the Edelweiss
Gartens Phases 6 -12 consisting of 367 lots on 94.417 acres generally located at
Victoria Avenue and Night Rain Drive. This item includes a Replat of Lots 1, 4, 5, 6,
7, and 8 of the Bald Prairie Subdivision. Case #04 - 281 (JR /AG)
P &Z Minutes Regular Agenda 06 -22 -05 Page 1 of 6
2.4 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Vacating and Final Plat for the
Indian Lakes Subdivision Ph. 4, Lot 11 Block 8 and Lots 31-36 Block 9, consisting of
9 lots on 19.909 acres, generally located north of Indian Lakes Drive and east of
Chaco Canyon Drive in the City's extraterritorial jurisdiction. Case #05
(MH/AG)
2.5 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for the Indian Lakes
Subdivision Phase 7 consisting of 10 lots on 18.28 acres, generally located south of
Chaco Canyon Drive in the City's extraterritorial jurisdiction. Case #05
(MH/AG)
Commissioner Davis motioned to approve the consent agenda. Commissioner
Reynolds seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0).
Regular Agenda.
3. Consideration, discussion and possible action on request(s) for absence from meetings.
- Ben White — May 19, 2005, Meeting & Resignation
- Marilyn Hooton — May 19, 2005, Meeting
- John Nichols — June 2, 2005, Meeting
Nlarilyn Hooton — June 2, 2005, Meeting
- John Fedora — June 2, 2005, Meeting
- Scott Shafer — June 16, 2005, 'Meeting
Bill Davis — June 16, 2005, Meeting
- John Fedora, June 16, 2005, Meeting
Commissioner Hooton motioned to approve the absence requests and resignation.
Commissioner Fedora seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0).
4. Discussion of minor and amending plats approved by Staff, and plats approved due to
inaction by the Commission.
05-62 Stone Forest Phase 1 — Final Plat Amending — (iF/JN)
05-63 Crescent Pointe Phase 1 — Preliminary Plat — (MH/JN)
— 05-67 Spring Creek Townhomes Phase 1 — Final Plat Amending — (MH/JN)
- 05-91 Bald Prairie — Final Plat Amending — (JR/AG)
Joey Dunn, Director, explained to Commissioners that Stone Forest Phase 1, Spring Creek
Townhomes Phase 1 and Bald Prairie are all final plats/minor plats and do not require
action by the Commission and were approved at staff level. The other item was Crescent
Point Phase 1 and an itcm that is in the process of being approved due to no action by the
Commission. The statute requires a 30-day consideration or deemed approved due to no
action. The two that are in this category are preliminary plats, Crescent Point Phase 1
preliminary plat and Indian Lakes preliminary plat. Dunn stated that preliminary plats are
not filed at the courthouse and do not require signatures but the Unified Development
Ordinance requires that such items be acted on within 30 days.
P&Z Minutes Regular Agenda 06-22-05 Page 2 of 6
5. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda
by Commission action.
None
6. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat and Replat of the
University Town Center Subdivision consisting of 4 lots on 20.02 acres generally located
south of the intersection of University Drive and Tarrow Drive East. Case #04
(JR/AG)
Alan Gibbs, Assistant City Engineer, gave a presentation on the Final Plat and Rep lat of the
University Town Center Subdivision. Gibbs stated that this serves as a clean up to
consolidate the previously unplatted acreage as well as replat portions of the Henton
Subdivision and One Lincoln Place Subdivision. Everything is in compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan and staff recommended approval of this Final Plat/Replat.
Commissioner Fedora motioned to approve the Final Plat/Replat. Commissioner
Hooton seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0).
7. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Replat and Final Plat for
the Century Hill Development Subdivision consisting of 15 lots on 36.92 acres generally
located at 1595 Sebesta Road, cast of the Earl Rudder Freeway (SH 6). Case #05
(TF/CC)
Trey Fletcher, Senior Planner, gave a presentation on a Replat and Final Plat for Century Hill
Development Subdivision. Fletcher stated that on May 5, 2005, the Commission reviewed
and approved the Preliminary Plat. Staff recommended approval of the Final Plat.
Commissioner Davis motioned to approve the Final Plat/Replat. Commissioner
Hooton seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0).
8. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Rezoning for Callaway
Subdivision Phase 11 consisting of approximately 14 acres, located on the east side of
Marion Pugh Drive, approximately 500' south of the intersection of George Bush Drive,
including a portion of the Luther Street Right-of-Way, from C-1 General Commercial to R-6
High Density Multi-Family. Case #05 (JP)
Jennifer Prochazka, Staff Planner, gave a presentation on the Rezoning for Callaway
Subdivision Phase II. Prochazka stated that she wanted to give clarification on one item that
was with the application and in the staff report. She stated that at this time the right-of-way
for Luther Street had been abandoned and is no longer owned by the City of College
Station. Their request is for R-6, High Density Multi-Family, for development of an
apartment complex. This item was denied by the City Council a couple of months ago and
then allowed to come back for a new hearing waiving the 180-day waiting period because of
new information submitted by the applicant. The new information submitted was a letter
for a proposed development participation agreement for the construction of a portion of
Marion Pugh Drive. The applicant also submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). The
TIA assumes the extension of Marion Pugh Drive is constructed as the developer has
indicated in the letter. The primary finding of the TIA is that the traffic from the
P&Z Minutes Regular Agenda 06-22-05 Page 3 of 6
development will be accommodated with the transportation system, assuming that Marion
Pugh is constructed through. It is also expected that the traffic peak for this development
will be different than others in the area. Prochazka stated that staff has reviewed the TIA
and is in general agreement with assumptions and conclusions within the report. The Land
Use Plan in this area designates the property as Residential Attached, which indicates that
this Rezoning would be in compliance with the Land Use Plan. It is also in compliance with
general development policies of the City which seek to locate Multi- Family Development
closer to the University. Prochazka stated that there is a slight change in the wording in
Staff's recommendation from what was listed in the staff report. Staff's recommendation is
for approval of the Rezoning with the condition that the developer completes the extension
of Marion Pugh Drive from Luther Street to I lolleman Street and that it be accepted prior to
the Certificate of Occupancy being issued for the development. Prochazka stated that there
was an e -mail received this morning that has been placed at each Commissioner's place, and
there was one other letter submitted in opposition to this request that was included in their
packets.
Commissioner Davis asked for clarification on the thoroughfare plan regarding the
extension of Marion Pugh Drive, Holleman Drive and Jones Butler Drive. Davis stated that
when Marion Pugh Drive extends to Holleman Drive it would provide another outlet for
traffic. Davis asked if Jones Butler Drive would be extended. Alan Gibbs stated that there
are discussions with Texas A&M regarding the extension of Jones Butler Drive. Gibbs also
gave clarification regarding the proposed road construction to take place in this area. Gibbs
explained that it is proposed that there will be grade separation and elevated sidewalks for
pedestrians and bikes. Gibbs also went over part of the sections in the TIA in order to give
Commissioners clarification regarding the traffic rankings.
Chuck Ellison, 2902 Camille Drive, College Station, Texas, representative of the applicant.
Ellison stated that, the applicant completed the TIA which stated that the level of service at
Marion Pugh and Holleman Drive and the level of service at Marion Pugh and Bush Drive
will remain at level of service D, even after the development. The applicant has also taken
great steps to try to enhance the multi-mode of transportation. There will be pedestrian
ways that reach from the new development through the existing Callaway House so that
residents can cross there and pick up the bus there and in addition there will be wider bike
paths and more bike parking. In addition, there will be a meal plan available to the new
residents if they accept that, residents will not have to get in their cars and drive to the
restaurants. Ellison stated that the applicant has offered a development agreement, which
has been submitted to the City and is under review. As of June 17, 2005, the applicant
understands that the recommendation of staff is that a condition be unposed. "1 he
condition, that the applicant had asked to be imposed, is that no Certificate of Occupancy be
issued on the project until Marion Pugh is extended from Luther Street to Holleman Street
as a major collector. The reason for this is because at this time Marion Pugh is not designed
yet, the applicant has been designing the site and the development plans need to be
approved in order to continue. Ellison stated that the fear of the applicant was that in the
recommendation it is stated that Marion Pugh develop at the same time that the project
develop and that staff would interpret that as not being able to give the applicant a
development permit on the apartment site until plans have been seen and approved for
Marion Pugh Drive. Logistically, the engineers will complete the site plan and get
development permits on the apartment project, immediately finalize the plans for Marion
Pugh, and then the contractor will move from the apartment site directly to creating the
Marion Pugh roadway. It is understood by the applicant that unless Marion Pugh is
P&Z Minutes Regular Agenda 06 -22 -05 Page 4 of 6
completed as a major collector that a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued. The
applicant is requesting that the Commissioner's approve the rezoning on the condition that
the developer complete Marion Pugh from Luther Street to Holleman Street before a
Certificate of Occupancy is issued for the apartment complex.
Commissioner Davis motioned to approve the Rezoning with the condition that
Marion Pugh be completed from Luther Street to Holleman Street and be
functioning as a street before a Certificate of Occupancy will be issued.
Commissioner Reynolds seconded the motion. Chairman Shafer asked for staff's
feelings on the project.
Prochazka stated that staff agreed with the applicant regarding the rezoning and condition.
Chairman Shafer asked for clarification regarding the existing pedestrian crossing
between this facility and the existing Callaway House on Marion Pugh.
Prochazka stated that there is currently a crosswalk from the developed parking lot on the
side of the street to the Callaway House dormitory for that purpose.
Chairman Shafer asked for a reading of the condition.
Lisa Lindgren, Staff Assistant, read the proposed condition. The condition is that the
developer extends Nlarion Pugh Drive from Luther Street to Holleman Street before a
Certificate of Occupancy will be granted.
Commissioners voted on the approval of the rezoning with the condition. Motion
passed (5 -0).
9. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Rezoning for Lot 1 of the
Callaway House Parking Subdivision, 1.35 acres, generally located along the east side of
Marion Pugh Drive, approximately 200 feet south of the intersection with George Bush
Drive, from C -1 General Commercial to R -6 High Density Multi- Family. Case #05 -
(JP /CC)
Jennifer Prochazka, Staff Planner, gave a presentation regarding the Callaway House Parking
Subdivision. Prochazka stated that the project is currently developed as an overflow parking
lot for the Callaway House dormitory located on the West side of Marion Pugh Drive and
that the rezoning would bring the current use of the property as an apartment parking lot
into compliance.'' The application indicated that the parking lot may continue to be used as
overflow parking for the Callaway House dormitory or may be used as parking for the
proposed development to the South, in either case it would be in compliance. The Land Use
Plan designates this property as residential attached and the property is already developed in
compliance with the Comprehensive Plan in the proposed zoning. Staff recommended
approval of the rezoning.
Rabun Metcalf, 1411 Elton Court, College Station, Texas. Mr. Metcalf stated that he just
wanted to add that it is for the development to the South and it will stay in its existing nature
with the exception of adding some pedestrian connectivity to provide that non - vehicular
access.
P&Z Minutes Regular Agenda 06 -22 -05 Page 5 of 6
Commissioner Reynolds motioned to approve the rezoning. Commissioner Fedora
seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0).
10. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items — A Planning and Zoning Member
may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific
factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall
be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
Commissioner Davis asked for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to be put on the next
workshop agenda.
11. Adjourn.
Commissioner Davis motioned to adjourn. Commissioner Fedora seconded the
motion, motion passed (5-0).
Approved:
Scott Shafer, Chairman
Planning and Zoning Commission
Attest:
Lisa Lindgren, Staff Assistant
Planning & Development Services
P&Z Minutes Regular Agenda 06-22-05 Page 6 of 6
Consent Agenda 2.2
Presentation, discussion, and possible
action on a Final Plat for Williams
Creek Subdivision, Phase 4, consisting
of 25 lots on 35.96 acres, generally
located on the south side of Rock
Prairie Road, southeast of the
intersection of Greens Prairie Road
and Rock Prairie Road. Case #05 -97
(JR /CC)
STAFF REPORT
Project Manager: Jennifer Reeves, Planner Report Date: June 27, 2005
Email: jreeves @cstx.gov Meeting Date: July 7, 2005
Item: Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for Williams
Creek Subdivision, Phase 4, consisting of 25 lots on 35.96 acres, generally
located on the south side of Rock Prairie Road, southeast of the intersection of
Greens Prairie Road and Rock Prairie Road.
Applicant: Joe & Janet Johnson Land & Investments, L.P., Property Owner
Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat as
submitted.
Item Summary: This item is for Final Plat of Phase 4 of the Williams Creek
Subdivision for the development of a single - family residential subdivision. This
plat includes a 1.796 acre common area and includes the dedication of 35' of
Rock Prairie Road Right -of -Way at 1.394 acres. Rock Prairie Road is currently
unimproved along the subject property.
The property is zoned AO -R and falls under Chapter 9, Section 12, Subdivision
Regulations. The plat is in not in compliance with Section 12 of the Subdivision
Regulations but a number of variances were granted by the Commission with the
Preliminary Plat for Williams Creek as listed in Note #11 on the plat. Those
which affect Phase 4 include variances to Sections 12 -1.5, Half Streets; 12 -K.1,
Block Length; 12 -J.2, Utility Easements; 12 -R.3, Sanitary Sewer Master Plan;
and Section 15, Ownership. The property is located in CCN area of Wellborn
Special Utility District.
The Sewer Master Plan was approved by the City Council on August 9, 2004.
Sewer will be by on site sewer facility (OSSF). BTU will supply the majority of
lots with electric service except as noted on the plat (see note #8).
Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan designates this
property and the surrounding area for Single Family Residential - Low Density.
Greens Prairie Road is designated as a major arterial on the Thoroughfare Plan.
Rock Prairie Road is shown as a major collector in this area.
Item Background: The property was annexed in 2002 and zoned A -O
Agricultural Open at that time. The property was rezoned to A -OR Rural
Residential in 2004.
Related Advisory Board Recommendations: The Parks Board accepted fee in
lieu of land dedication.
Commission Action Options: The Commission has final authority over the
Final Plat. The options regarding the plat are:
• Approval
• Denial
Supporting Materials:
1. Location Map
2. Aerial Map
3. Application
4. Copy of Final Plat
h
s J
Z
C
it
NI
i "s
;t)
y Q
lid �
P
F 'TT`
V/
ky O IA
sy
k7.55
= t/)
0 Ce
U Tr
S
W
W
�U
oy --------------- �
�/J
2
d
a
.4,,,
W
4 ww
1 jk3 �� � LIB
Z
•
y� W SS /*cc C
�H
#44 O
�S�
J
s� . W
0 .L ,a�
0
Q
CI N :_,-'
\ '''\ 4 8
X13 o
(*ter FOR OFFICE / U , EON
P &Z CASE NO.: t.�`
( � DATE SUBMITTED: u✓ 1 05
E
CITY 01: COLT Cit: STATION V .
l' &ntunt & Development Semite, '�'"
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
(Check one) ❑ Minor ❑ Amending U Final ❑ Vacating ❑ Re p lat
($300.00) ($300.00) ($400.00) ($400.00) ($600.00)'
FlikS t GX'j•dt 5j t'k-T 'Includes public hearing fee
The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P&Z Commission consideration.
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
v ✓ Filing Fee (see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets - $55.00 per additional sheet *- T
15/ Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations - $100 (if applicable) = t5s
Development Permit Application Fee of $200.00 (if applicable).
v" Infrastructure Inspection Fee of $600.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed)
Application completed in full.
tik Copy of original deed restrictions /covenants for replats (if applicable).
Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.)
One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and /or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable).
v ./ Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D.
A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable). .
✓ Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of
approval (if applicable).
Nr
Date of Preapplication Conference: 4 —VOLY� 2.01
NAME OF SUBDIVISION �'A \ a C o S 64 t'i t C ,�1 Y
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF P OPQSED SUBDIVISION (Lot & Block) 5 .) -4"i. or (sY'./ee.y' 4 alyi—e cj tSf tro.26 - r
a-or (er mac . A.t
APPLICANT /PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project):
Name Joe: j jv e Jokvicr,: -n 1- ci.vlrt p /t4e.S E' •+ -� .P
Street Address (400 SS00 C0 itAw )e - c•,t ct..X `.e., Cit C n st.WI ,vi
State 1 Y. Zip Code - RA '34- E -Mail Address —
Phone Number NS Fax Number ( s) 1 7,S ^ xo 72_.
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name , Jias\e A A okn rN Lt v ►c} t� 4(11 . S L ►'
Street Address 1400 � joal -��. COvvWY1.Q,r4' ct y4 City Cott viva y1
State `T Y( Zip Code •r? tot) 34- E -Mail Address •"-
Phone Number 07-- (02-5 -. 2A114-- Fax Number (737,"; Li '6(072-
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name 1161. -0 n Joe S1
Street Address 1101 &Yi , ck.,, -v aek City Col It'A"o tj`�"c�i 2ho-Y-
State IV- Zi Code E -Mail Address J c l�u , t @ ' kCop , Vt.e+
Phone Number (' 14 t) - -`?1k Fax Number Or) .? 64-1
6/13/03
I n!
May 27 05 09:33a Texcon Engineering Div. 979 -764 -7759 p.3
N i j �t j,14.,1t G.
y si.
c 0e U 1 wbt t c
Is there a temporary blanket easement this property? If so, please provide the Volume and and Page to
Acreage - Total Property 35, 9p 0 Ac Total # (Hints 2.3 R O -W Acreage `.'> . 21 eIC
Existing Use: _ VC.I.C.a. yr Proposed Use: _ r~u v �, i e4k win, L v`..-.l
Number Of Lots By Zoning District 1 1_1 4- l l l
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District
r 2.604,/ ; O
Floodptain Acreage —, 0
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and approved Master Plan and /or Preliminary Plat (if
applicable): (
Cij Co t1vi Ct1�:v,G -t S 1
kic, �; li scc i Sk ✓t
RequestedVariances�To Subdivision Regulations & Reason For Same: v /DU r' ' P o • ��z 41
Rya v/L rn.wAtu( 1" L0�
Requested Oversr?e Participation: lip v '
Total Linear Footage of Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
Proposed Public:
ACREAGE:
3 Streets
- Sidewalks # of acres to be dedicated + S development fee
- Sanitary Sewer Lines # of acres in floodplain
2-5C0 Water Lines # of acres in detention
( Channels # of acres in greenways
Storm Sewers (6..ks vVs OR
- Bike Lanes / Paths FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
2-3 # of Single - Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $ 12. 7 '
4/Z 017 4.2cii" (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,
correct, and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above - identified
final plat and attests that this request does not amend any covenants or restrictions associated with this plat.
Akrik111-. &JILL
S s more and Title Dale
7d :re
6:13)03 2
May 27 05 09:46a Texcon Engineering Div. 979- 764 -7759 p.1
SUPPLEMENTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT INFORMATION
Application is hereby made for the following development specific site/waterway alterations:
`1)111 -i ( C-I-e z----- ? rx i` ?In S-t- I f' - z 4 � � tt UC vc 1 A :r esq.,
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
j, � 0.v,P k J-1 „n „ ', , design engineer /owner, hereby acknowledge or affirm that:
The information and conclusions contained in the above plans and supporting documents comply with the current
requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and its associated Drainage Policy and Design
Standards. As a condition of approval of this permit application, I agree to construct the improvements proposed in this
..plic. on according to these .. rne, s and the requirements of Ch.l.ter 13 of ,. C ll t St i ion City Code.
4 4 / A..1 44 ,/ t... •Z`ll��
Pr., y Owner(s) ni v,er =r
C TIF(CATIONS: (for proposed alterations within designated flood hazard areas.)
A certify that any nonresidential structure on or proposed to be on this site
as part of this application is designated to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the
100 year storm_
Engineer Date
B. I, _ _ certify that the finished floor elevation of the- lowest floor. including any
basement, of any residential structure, proposed as part of this application is at or above the base flood elevation
established in the latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Study and maps, as amended.
__400. �'mt� Date
Engir> . OF 1 .A�
••• » E. .• V ..),5 ,\._ P ” _ _, certify that the alterations or development covered by this permit shall
f toctliMinish ;, >l ood -cllrr i " caps ity of the waterway adjoining or crossing this permitted site and that such alterations
:deuel: t.ace..cn t with requirements of the City of College Station City Code. Chapter 13 concerning
n . c 5 t.. '� rRs . i' , 45 of 11* i r ay fringes. S
E `''sS�rSTE: Date
D � J •NAL ��" , do certify that the proposed alterations do not raise the level of the 100
year flood 36` a evation established in the latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard. Study.
Engineer Date —
Conditions or comments as part of approval:
In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to
insure that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage
facilities. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City
Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall
apply.
G113,03
Consent Agenda 2.3
Presentation, discussion, and possible
action on a Preliminary Plat of the
Callaway Subdivision, Phase 2,
consisting of 1 lot on 13.799 acres,
generally located on the east side of
Marion Pugh Drive, approximately
500' south of the intersection of George
Bush Drive. Case #05 -94 (JP /AG)
STAFF REPORT
Project Manager: Jennifer Prochazka, Planner Report Date: June 27, 2005
Email: jprochazka @cstx.gov Meeting Date: July 7, 2005
Item: Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Preliminary Plat of the
Callaway Subdivision, Phase 2, consisting of 1 lot on 13.799 acres, generally
located on the east side of Marion Pugh Drive, approximately 500' south of the
intersection of George Bush Drive.
Applicant: Rabon Metcalf, P.E., Rabon Metcalf Engineering, agent for ACC OP
(Callaway Villas) LP, Property Owner.
Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat
as submitted.
Item Summary: This item is for consideration of a Preliminary Plat for one R -6
High- Density Multifamily lot for the development of an apartment complex. This
plat includes a portion of the recently abandoned Luther Street Right -of -Way.
The plat is in compliance with the Subdivision Regulations.
Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan designates this
property as Residential Attached. Marion Pugh Drive is designated as a major
collector on the Thoroughfare Plan and Wellborn Road is designated as a major
arterial.
Item Background: The property was annexed in to the City and zoned Industrial
in 1958. When the zoning was changed to M -2, the district also included C -1
uses. In 1984 an amendment was made to the Zoning Ordinance that prohibited
C -1 uses in M -2 zones, however, this particular property was specifically
exempted from the exclusion of C -1 uses in an M -2 zone, and allowed the
General Commercial uses. With the adoption of the Unified Development
Ordinance, City Staff worked with the property owners by giving them the choice
of retaining the M -2 classification without the commercial uses or being rezoned
to C -1 to include the commercial uses. The property was zoned C -1 with the
adoption of that Ordinance. The property was zoned R -6 High- Density
Multifamily in June 2005.
Luther Street was closed in this area in the 1990s and the right -of -way was
formally abandoned in June 2005.
Related Advisory Board Recommendations: The Parks Board recommends
fee in lieu of land dedication.
Commission Action Options: The Commission has final authority over the
Preliminary Plat. The options regarding the Preliminary Plat are:
• Approval
• Denial
Supporting Materials:
1. Location Map
2. Aerial Map
3. Application
4. Copy of Final Plat
m S � •
k> 1.
,/ x., �� - s c A bp / o, �T 0 ,...:4,- t o o� /^ v � P 1-:' II- 111141P4>" , , ,, ‘,.4, , - 4''' .41C/ 44*.lt" '''. ';:x".A'''
-,, ,?,0Atit , 41k ,
LIJ
/....,, ,
, ,
, 0,.-
Ce
,../ ''' ,. "V.:, , ■,",,./ • °Il fr,„,,‘ ‘' 1..' ..+ • 4 44, - -,:. - i p -,, / , .4,., 44,8
/ ' ' !,,; ' ....--, i -,.. .
h ry i ry ^i �' . / fj.
ff1-414*A' ,--,_
Tr co
10 CC tillIl
I 4 111101 .
\' L by 6 � .w ,^
ai
/ t
� N.
\ p m fi \. �\ / / /;, \,- $,,o,, e by ', l / v i 010
' y V 3 / /h t IX N
Ito
� LA P `f ✓ / �� � � � 0 = i
11 1
,,,,,„," r.�/ i E
/ ,/./q„,., �^ ''''C'' Z 1
\r' �b f ' b / ` I, S'' ,4"4.- ` O poll
441111111111.111"11 1111.111a6.*-791.1* II. '1'
r
• P •
--- 9!.-
\''''.! \
\ U
CO I
W
0
CO u-
N Z
U 0)
2
oa
UD
ow
>1
2O6- FO vlVt`141
(ice
FOR OFFICE USE ONI.N
P&Z CASE NO.: 05 ‘1
:ITY OF COLLEGE STATION DATE SUBMITTED: 6
Planning & Development Services
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION
The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P & Z Commission
consideration.
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
1 -/' X Filing Fee of $400.00.
N/A Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations - $100 (if applicable)
--- X Application completed in full.
X Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A revised mylar original must be submitted after staff review.)
N/A One (1) copy of the approved Master Plan if applicable.
X A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
N/A Rezoning Application if zone change is proposed.
N/A Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of
approval (if applicable).
Date of Preapplication Conference: March 7, 2005
NAME OF SUBDIVISION Callaway Subdivision, Phase Two
PECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION 305 Marion Pugh Drive
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project):
Name Rabon Metcalf, P.E. (Rabon Metcalf Enaineerina)
Street Address P.O. Box 9253 City College Station
State TX Zip Code 77842 E-Mail Address rmenpineeraverizon.net
Phone Number (979) 690-0329 Fax Number (979) 690-0329
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (ALL owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for
multiple owners):
Name Page Callaway (Callaway Development Corporation)
Street Address 1250 N.E. Loop 410, Suite 800 City San Antonio
State TX Zip Code 78209 E-Mail Address pcallawayeiCallawayDevelopment.com
Phone Number (210) 822-0200 Fax Number 1210) 820-3361
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name Same as applicant
Total Acres Of Subdivision j, Acreage 0.2k, Total # Of Lots 1
Number Of Lots By Zoning District I /R-6
verage Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
13.801 /R-6
Floodplain Acreage 0.0
Parkland dedication by acreage or fee? Fee
A statement addressing any differences between the Preliminary Plat and approved Master Plan (if
applicable) N/A
Requested variances to subdivision regulations & reason for same N/A
Requested oversize participation N/A
I Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
CREAGE:
# of Acres to be dedicated # of acres in floodplain
# of acres in detention # of acres in greenways
OR
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
236 # of Multi-Family Dwelling Units X $452 = $ 106,672.00
(date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits
attached hereto . - true and correct. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of
College Station of he above identified plat and attests that all respective owners have been identified
on this application.
1111
'45
-si ure and Title Date
Consent Agenda 2.4
Presentation, discussion, and possible
action on a Final Plat for Westfield
Village Ph. 5 consisting of 35 lots on
11.259 acres generally located south of
the future intersection of Newport
Lane and Eagle Avenue. Case #05 -93
(MH /CC)
STAFF REPORT
Project Manager: Molly Hitchcock Report Date: June 27, 2005
Email: mhitchcock @cstx.gov Meeting Date: July 7, 2005
Item: Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for Westfield
Village Ph. 5 consisting of 35 lots on 11.259 acres generally located south of the
future intersection of Newport Lane and Eagle Avenue.
Applicant: Randy French of BCS Development Company
Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the final plat.
Item Summary: The area under consideration is zoned PDD, which allows for
modified lot dimensions, setbacks, and sidewalks in this proposed single - family
residential medium density subdivision. All of the lots meet the minimum
standards for the concept plan - approved 45 -foot or 35 -foot wide residential lots.
Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The proposed density is 3.1 dwelling
units per acre, which falls within the anticipated residential density of the Land
Use Plan (3 -6 DU /acre). The new residential street will intersect with Newport
Lane, a minor collector on the Thoroughfare Plan.
Item Background: This property was rezoned in 2001. The most recent
preliminary plat for this area was approved by the Planning and Zoning
Commission on April 19, 2005. Phases 1, 2, 3, and 6 have already been final
platted.
Related Advisory Board Recommendations: Fees in lieu of land were
accepted by the Parks Board in 2001.
Commission Action Options: The Commission has final authority over the final
plat. The options regarding the final plat are:
• Approval with conditions;
• Approval as submitted; or
• Denial.
Supporting Materials:
1. Location Map
2. Aerial Map
3. Application
4. Copy of Final Plat
. ,- !
/,,,x/60 � 6 � � �� r i � � d(J i � < �� ���
/ c/ � :7„--4, y7.� � a / 4 � N,,- w ' , !` c J -, '7 : ' " CY O rr { K `� �,�\ ) tG / r . �Y.� � Otl�, � .
X J/ z
v • " - -.,
G b �. r v rn/ rn .
�-� / „r, `�' ^ . , ' °.� Olt / „,',9/,,,„ / o , f / � 6 � /r
1 y- oo
l .. ` - / �, - / / ' > ,
s ' a f. Z� ., , .. ^^S ., � h. . / ' / , - f r,
° "ate G ° /
> a
!,. ,, ,,
s i / / q , . I : �..w/ y tti M
`'/ . �, / r f` '"`i 0-, ; -/ qy / r., mss ! ° r Ll y �” - ---c•- <--, ! �
ON
°�2 cV •C. ' *� 'y- c� , t � r/ ' v � U , � -2',.. �,p ti Q pR w ' c /
,�bjc� ! ! !��! `� a5 411
V C� d / i- � , • �?/ / ! ,. \�, aQ� l , .4 ` ? , t � a � „n' f , �?
Cv� ` '1 ,, '- --_$. ,5�� ° 3 n r, ��'� \u� i b D� � y " � ' �955� ` CJ
y / rfi+ / '� N s V e; A '� \ 'z
,( / /'��.�. �,.., g2 � a ! / , �tl. .�� D` v � A ! 'N.; @ , : 4, r �, '�s <r- rQ1S
v �� / ")
�; , -
Aiiiii ii I I ii ii Immo apv
5,
ice ^ ' h. 5`, Q\ \
111 II II 11 11 11 11 l ihk hk. 4lli"IIIIIIIIIIIIIIL
I� � .h � ..,..0- /C al Z
a
M H
Cip
.1441111111 11 11,
�
w
t� u ti 4'''' / �` ^ i v
�,� q /
a � _ ��� C ti� v t t � , �'
. ki
c y a 43 ' rn �, �� >
o " ' ap "� / � \
0
4* ,,,, ,-, ,. , --, v ,, r, , - �� o 00 :;) � g� MCP �c 1 / , 0
�^ V�� y cY: fi x~' ,., ac �C� ° /
‘,.?,t_ o i t�� •a ^ v.a, J, 1/16„ v� Pi
Cj' � "'� 'l 5' �c� ro �� Vic. n , 7 c <O,\. V �
c;
'. — / \ \ N i c , /
O � ■ %�a, ti o i � �
^Kr, `,i4`+7_ M� � ��� ^ \ , S+� \ , c i , s , 5 ,>✓ �� � � o\ c,,, / ";
ck
� &.c. 4 \ ' 4 v S C � � , / � j j s',, Oti .� 't �.\ • • +" 1 l "1/ CJ , / `
s. /
`�\ _ \ y\
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
P&Z CASE NO.: 0 3
4tr
DATE FOR
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Planning th Development Services y�
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
(Check one) 1 1 Minor ❑ Amending XI Final (i Vacating ❑ Replat
($300.00) ($300.00) ($400.00) ($400.00) ($600.00)*
*Includes public hearing fee
The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P &Z Commission consideration.
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
E Filing Fee (see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets - $55.00 per additional sheet
N/A Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations — $100 (if applicable)
N/A Development Permit Application Fee of $200.00 (if applicable).
N/A Infrastructure Inspection Fee of $600.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed)
El Application completed in full.
N/A Copy of original deed restrictions /covenants for replats (if applicable).
E. Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.)
N/A One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and /or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable).
Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D.
Ei A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
N/A Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable).
N/A Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of
approval (if applicable).
Date of Preapplication Conference:
NAME OF SUBDIVISION Westfield Village, Phase Five
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot & Block) Robert Stevenson League A -54
APPLICANT /PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project):
Name B /CS Development Company: Attn: Mr. Randy French
Street Address 4090 SH 6 South City College Station
State Texas Zip Code 77845 E -Mail Address rfrench(astvlecraft builders.com
Phone Number (979) 690 - 1222 x11 Fax Number (979) 690 - 9069
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name (Same as above)
Street Address City
State Zip Code E -Mail Address
Phone Number Fax Number
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name McClure & Browne Engineering /Surveying, Inc.; Attn: Mike McClure
Street Address 1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103 City College Station
State Texas Zip Code 77845 E - Mail Address MikeM c(D McCIureBrowne.com
Phone Number (979) 693 -3838 Fax Number (979) 693 -2554
6/13/03 1 of 5
Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so, please provide the Volume and Page #
Acreage - Total Property 11.259 acres Total # Of Lots 35 R -O -W Acreage 1.998 acres
Existing Use: Vacant Proposed Use: Residential
umber Of Lots By Zoning District PDD / 35
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: 0.141 / PDD
Floodplain Acreage None
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and approved Master Plan and /or Preliminary Plat (if
applicable): N/A
Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations & Reason For Same: N/A
Requested Oversize Participation: N/A
Total Linear Footage of Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
Proposed Public:
ACREAGE:
1607 Streets
618 Sidewalks # of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee
1250 Sanitary Sewer Lines # of acres in floodplain
1330 Water Lines # of acres in detention
-0- Channels # of acres in greenways
913 Storm Sewers OR
-0- Bike Lanes / Paths FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
# of Single- Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $
(date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,
correct, and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above - identified
final plat and attests that this request does not amend any covenants or restrictions associated with this plat.
d. l J s O s
Sig :ture and Ti e� 0 facer , z Date JJ
6/13/03 2 of 5
Regular Agenda 4
Presentation, discussion, and possible
action on a Variance from Section
8.G.10 Geometric Standards, Street
Design Criteria of the Subdivision
Regulations; and presentation,
discussion, and possible action on a
Final Plat for Westfield Village Ph. 4
consisting of 69 lots on 19.644 acres
generally located east of the
intersection of Victoria Avenue and
Eagle Avenue. Case #05 -92
(MH /CC).
STAFF REPORT
Project Manager: Molly Hitchcock Report Date: June 28, 2005
Email: mhitchcock @cstx.gov Meeting Date: July 7, 2005
Item: Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Variance from Section
8.G.10 Geometric Standards, Street Design Criteria of the Subdivision
Regulations; and presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for
Westfield Village Ph. 4 consisting of 69 lots on 19.644 acres generally located
east of the intersection of Victoria Avenue and Eagle Avenue.
Applicant: Randy French of BCS Development Company, Owner
Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the final plat provided
that the variance request is approved by the Commission.
Item Summary: The area under consideration is zoned PDD, which allows for
modified lot dimensions, setbacks, and sidewalks in this proposed single - family
residential medium density subdivision. All of the lots meet the minimum
standards for the concept plan- approved 45 -foot or 35 -foot wide residential lots.
The Applicant is requesting a variance from the alley pavement width of 20 feet
that is required in the Subdivision Regulations. The alley pavement width that is
being proposed with this development is 12 feet.
Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The proposed density is 3.5 dwelling
units per acre, which falls within the anticipated residential density of the Land
Use Plan (3 -6 DU /acre). The new residential street will intersect with Newport
Lane, a minor collector on the Thoroughfare Plan.
Item Background: This property was rezoned in 2001. The most recent
preliminary plat for this area was approved by the Planning and Zoning
Commission on April 19, 2005. Phases 1, 2, 3, and 6 have already been final
platted.
Related Advisory Board Recommendations: Fees in lieu of land were
accepted by the Parks Board in 2001.
Commission Action Options Regarding the Variance Request: The
Commission must consider the variance request prior to approving the plat. The
options regarding the variance are:
• Approval or
• Denial.
Commission Action Options: The Commission has final authority over the final
plat. The options regarding the final plat are:
• Approval with conditions;
• Approval as submitted; or
• Denial.
Supporting Materials:
1. Location Map
2. Aerial Map
3. Application
4. Variance Request Letter
5. Copy of Final Plat
A., Y om, bit .,\ ` r, r, /rnz toy N. 4,: l� f a F
/ '' P� ,-, / ¢, ? / cam, ( �i h 1 ,,'(/
, �' &,/''''''%-., ° /+ o i� ♦ d b '", a ^� �,�} �� /
- . -c,- � � a ti 2 � /, r. h: � _ , . � 2 v. i. �o -,,Is 4� 4 �t " `k - b .
e CF
- , q ` 4 , / ,'4 4 , i ` j b � . �. s c, , r ,vim � V ` "' `s` F� � / ' " !° bV { -4, �♦, LT. R. ,. :. - 4k,,,, , ?,,/ 'I krAtl. , :,'1,• 4
/ . �. '. . g `�i , , -A r,,, '',.• i�b 414, PO � ? g � � °9 ^.
` / w r 4
�� /... h / �''' ., - � tib rr $� C O ti b y / �_
, ' /ry fi r.\ 7 y j ;/� 3 s' ° °4 /
ti o .14 ,-, `4 t v D f
') ' , <>, ''''.! '' •,{ ..I. ilo el
♦ Lti , ��J f''6"� c� �/
cc
`„r !,, 1 '', / ,./.- N /
j M \/ P
'� to f - `N �C . .0 N''' , /�\
i t v \ \_� p� A
i V
NIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
/ `,^ /\ \ , ' Z
\ , , i , ,\, k ..„ , I i i u h,‘..erii p,m 1 r 4 I I I I I I I I I I iiii I II I I II I I I III I I I I I III I il I II I I I IIII I I I I I I II . . . " ----1 °P.' 1 . # --,. _ \ \
lik '7. '411111111116
A
Cs )444
•
rT ,
N\ N' 1 4[ „,
+ r b" i { ! '! T , R •
0
O tt,
eV C /
44 ,�' G i• / Y o O {%
a a\ . �
� h � Q- � • ° + ='. o o l' S A O h �' cS' Y " \
AZ,, o o d l
. - ,� 0, 4 'S� � o
�t �y °� „G> 4 i • V L 4
( ..,1\ '- 1'.; N i
" ....v . i, • Ak, *
d. r c w I d '
i al
w �
V
Cid
/ ' NA " : . -'‘, V:2 41 t 41\ 0 ?
00
a M
9 �o �4 ° r r / ...{1 bk
, , -." 4 110p . ... ■
• —T. r ' 4 •, 4 F / ��
/ 7.'C , z ` ,.,,,,`"V„, •
ry. c 1`w: ��� � \;., !
z� , 'i _ ,, / / =`- /moo /.; _ ali„ � � . . d /N h
/ �
,� f � • , o � � � -
~ s� FOR OFFICE USE ON
' P &Z CASE NO.: i'''''
(*ff DATE SUBMITTED:
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Planning 6. Development Services
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
(Check one) n Minor n Amending CC Final 1 1 Vacating n Replat
($300.00) 0300.00) ($400.00) ($400.00) ($600.00)*
*Includes public hearing fee
The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P &Z Commission consideration.
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
E Filing Fee (see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets - $55.00 per additional sheet
N/A Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations — $100 (if applicable)
EI Development Permit Application Fee of $200.00 (if applicable).
Infrastructure Inspection Fee of $600.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed)
• Application completed in full.
N/A Copy of original deed restrictions /covenants for replats (if applicable).
El Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.)
N/A One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and /or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable).
• Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D.
jEl A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
Z Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable).
N/A Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of
approval (if applicable).
Date of Preapplication Conference:
NAME OF SUBDIVISION Westfield Village, Phase Four
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot & Block) Robert Stevenson League A -54
APPLICANT /PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project):
Name B/CS Development Company; Attn: Mr. Randy French
Street Address 4090 SH 6 South City College Station
State Texas Zip Code 77845 E -Mail Address rfrenchCa.stvlecraft builders.com
Phone Number (979) 690 -1222 x11 Fax Number (979) 690 - 9069
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name (Same as above)
Street Address City
State Zip Code E -Mail Address
Phone Number Fax Number
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name McClure & Browne Engineering /Surveying, Inc.: Attn: Mike McClure
Street Address 1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103 City College Station
State Texas Zip Code 77845 E - Mail Address MikeM
Phone Number (979) 693 -3838 Fax Number (979) 693 -2554
6/13/03 1 of 5
Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so, please provide the Volume and Page #
Acreage - Total Property 19.644 acres Total # Of Lots 69 R -O -W Acreage 5.522 acres
Existing Use: Vacant Proposed Use: Residential
4umber Of Lots By Zoning District PDD / 79
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: 0.146 / PDD
Floodplain Acreage None
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and approved Master Plan and /or Preliminary Plat (if
applicable): N/A
Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations & Reason For Same: N/A
Requested Oversize Participation: Victoria Avenue & 12" W/L along Victoria Avenue
Total Linear Footage of Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
Proposed Public:
ACREAGE:
4146 Streets
2760 Sidewalks # of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee
2213 Sanitary Sewer Lines # of acres in floodplain
2902 Water Lines # of acres in detention
633 Channels # of acres in greenways
1538 Storm Sewers OR
-0- Bike Lanes / Paths FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
# of Single - Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $
(date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,
correct, and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above - identified
final plat and attests that this request does not amend any covenants or restrictions associated with this plat.
Si. e - 4/3 A5
ature an Titles 2 j Date
6/13/03 2 of 5
Meat'. & BROWNE ENGINEERING LIRVEYING, INC.
1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103 • College Station, Texas 77845
(979) 693 -3838 • Fax (979) 693 -2554 • Email: mcdurebrowne@veizon.net
(.0 , +.--
i
June 28, 2005 \V
Mrs. Carol Cotter
City of College Station
P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Re: Westfield Village, Phases 4 & 5 — Variance Request for Alley Widths
Dear Carol:
The developer of Westfield Village, Phases 4 & 5 requests that a variance be granted to the
Subdivision Ordinance regarding the width of alleys in these two phases. The ordinance currently
requires that paved alleys be 20 feet wide in a 24 foot right -of -way, but we are requesting that a 12
foot wide alley in a 25 foot right -of -way be allowed. The primary reason for making this request is
to take advantage of a rule that is about to be implemented by the City Council in which 12 foot wide
alleys will become the standard width. This rule change is part of an overall revision to the City's
design standards in which many changes will be made. Its approval is anticipated in the next few
weeks.
The variance process requires the Planning & Zoning Commission to find in favor of four
issues before the variance can be approved. I will attempt to address these four issues below.
1. That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict
application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use
of his land.
Response: The special circumstance that will deprive the applicant of reasonable use of his
land is the impending change to the geometric design criteria. The staff's of both Bryan and
College Station, along with the local development community, have developed these new
guidelines and agreed that they are appropriate for this type of application. Strict application
of this rule will decrease the amount of area behind each home that can be used for lawns or
plantings that are common on other similar rights -of -way. It will also negatively impact the
economics of the development and give competitive advantages to other developers who are
not required to install the wider alleys following the anticipated rule change.
2. That the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property
right of the applicant.
Response: Westfield Village, Phases 1 through 5 are all part of a Planned Development that
has many common area features for the benefit of the property owners who live there. These
Mrs. Carol Cotter
Westfield Village, Phases 4 & 5
Page 2
include landscaped walking trails and greenways that are intended to enhance the quality of
life in the development. All of these improvements were agreed to with the city staff during
the initial planning stages of the project. The increased pavement width of these alleys
diminishes this "green" concept that was planned into the project from its inception without
providing any significant benefit for the public.
3. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare,
or injurious to other property in the area, or to the city in administering this chaper.
Response: The original intent of the wider pavement was to allow access for fire fighting
equipment in these alleys. However, during the development of the new design guidelines, the
staffs in both Bryan and College have agreed that access for fire fighting equipment is available
on the public streets in the front of these homes, just as it is for homes where there are no
alleys. Therefore, the wider alleys are not necessary for fire fighting equipment. There are no
other detriments to the public health, safety, or welfare, nor will the variance be injurious to
other property in the area.
4. That the granting of the variance will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision
of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
Response: The staff at the City of College Station has already agreed that the 12 foot wide
alley is acceptable and will be recommending its adoption to the City Council. This variance
simply allows that rule to be implemented before its formal adoption. It will not have any
negative effect on the orderly subdivision of other land in the area.
On behalf of the developer, I ask that you forward this variance request to the Planning and
Zoning Commission to be considered with the final plats for Phases 4 and 5. I also ask for your
support in approval of this variance request for the reasons outlined above. Enclosed is a check for
$100 as required for such variances. As always, I will be happy to answer any questions you have
regarding this project. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Kent Laza, P.E.
Project Administrator
xc: Randy French
enclosure
Regular Agenda 5
Presentation, discussion, and possible
action on a Final Plat of the Callaway
Subdivision, Phase 2, consisting of 1
lot on 13.799 acres, generally located on
the east side of Marion Pugh Drive,
approximately 500' south of the
intersection of George Bush Drive.
Case #05 -95 (JP /AG)
STAFF REPORT
Project Manager: Jennifer Prochazka, Planner Report Date: June 27, 2005
Email: jprochazka @cstx.gov Meeting Date: July 7, 2005
Item: Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat of the
Callaway Subdivision, Phase 2, consisting of 1 lot on 13.799 acres, generally
located on the east side of Marion Pugh Drive, approximately 500' south of the
intersection of George Bush Drive.
Applicant: Rabon Metcalf, P.E., Rabon Metcalf Engineering, agent for ACC OP
(Callaway Villas) LP, Property Owner.
Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat as
submitted.
Item Summary: This item is for consideration of a Final Plat for one R -6 High -
Density Multifamily lot for the development of an apartment complex. This plat
includes a portion of the recently abandoned Luther Street Right -of -Way.
The plat is in compliance with the Subdivision Regulations.
Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan designates this
property as Residential Attached. Marion Pugh Drive is designated as a major
collector on the Thoroughfare Plan and Wellborn Road is designated as a major
arterial.
Item Background: The property was annexed in to the City and zoned Industrial
in 1958. When the zoning was changed to M -2, the district also included C -1
uses. In 1984 an amendment was made to the Zoning Ordinance that prohibited
C -1 uses in M -2 zones, however, this particular property was specifically
exempted from the exclusion of C -1 uses in an M -2 zone, and allowed the
General Commercial uses. With the adoption of the Unified Development
Ordinance, City Staff worked with the property owners by giving them the choice
of retaining the M -2 classification without the commercial uses or being rezoned
to C -1 to include the commercial uses. The property was zoned C -1 with the
adoption of that Ordinance. The property was zoned R -6 High- Density
Multifamily in June 2005.
Luther Street was closed in this area in the 1990s and the right -of -way was
formally abandoned in June 2005.
Related Advisory Board Recommendations: The Parks Board recommends
fee in lieu of land dedication.
Commission Action Options: The Commission has final authority over the
Final Plat. The options regarding the Final Plat are:
• Approval
• Denial
Supporting Materials:
1. Location Map
2. Aerial Map
3. Application
4. Copy of Final Plat
n
eh,"*"'44 . )
4 d e A' 4 4, , Nii% , ; ,
I , ./..,/: -o ,/,.., eNN, •#, # ,,, lir
44 40 :4 8 .* - -, --„„4"41b,,,,- -J I._
#, A *
4 110,' ..4 -
'407
4 bfr,, , 4'4" ito . ' , it et.
4 4N 4 44 0 , - 4, , , ,i. 4 ,
,/,„, -_,..,,,... -,,../. , ,, ,,,, ,,,,, ,s . . t., , ''' -
il -N.,
de
iv . ,, , - / / 0 ,
Q
+ .
\ \\ A ma y ; �1-� Cr ` 0) ' ' `) \ . ‘,,,-%‘ ' q.,# 4,, , , ‘, , . in
, ai\ ,,,, itNr 4 \ 0
• , \ S ~ h IN
L 1 1111 ' 1
,‘,,,,,, % Ili , ‘,, ,„ \ - ' 6.
4 4 V4 j : < 3- j ,',,` ,%' ' ' ' # ;5 ` / ' \ ,e'' ' ' ' ' . ' 0 ? ' o
� �, / / i h � r ° cam "F� / �, k N
ms 4's qJ� A s. / � t �t G �1- v i' 5 R / fN p'
r
m s` /� : rs /a 4.'4' 3 � a.
0
° ti °n ob s / / { /\ w .►�� o'^
� ° a /v i a ° ' S � ."3►�� � Z
.' r- b • ,,,1*,,, ' 7 � j,a /� CD 1 / m t • �
0
4
V � Q Sj`V
e N
al
6,2 0
~W
O
_W
(
(I) I
OP
a) 2
U0
:' W
x Uo
zoa .-o .... ... , �.
i \ // )
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
�. ` .>
� P8Z CASE NO.: — 9 3
4: 11001111111111
DATE SUBMITTED: '
;1TY OF COLLEGE STATION
Planning d Development Services
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
(Check one) 0 Minor ❑ Amending ►1 Final ❑ Vacating ❑ Replat
($300.00) ($300.00) ($400.00) ($400.00) ($600.00)*
*Includes public hearing fee
The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P82 Commission
/ consideration.
MINIMUM SUBMITT REQUI REMENTS:
(_N/A Filing Fee (see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets - $55. per additional sheet
Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations - $100 (if applicable)
NM Development Permit Application Fee of $200.00 (if applicable).
NIA infrastructure Inspection Fee of $600.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed)
X Application completed in full.
NIA Copy of original deed restrictions /covenants for replats (if applicable).
v' X Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.)
X One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and /or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable).
v' X Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D.
J X A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
N/A Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable).
Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of
approval (if applicable).
Date of Preapplication Conference: March 7. 2005
NAME OF SUBDIVISION Callaway Subdivision, Phase Two
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot & Block) 305 Marion Pugh Drive
APPLICANT /PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project):
Name Rabon Metcalf, P.E. (Rabon Metcalf Engineering)
Street Address P.O. Box 9253 City College Station
State TX Zip Code 77842 E -Mail Address r menaineertverizon.net
Phone Number (979) 690 -0329 Fax Number (979) 690 -0329
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name Paae Callaway (Callaway Development Corporation)
Street Address 1250 N.E. Loop 410, Suite 800 City San Antonio
State TX Zip Code 78209 E -Mail Address pcallaway@CallawayDevelopment.com
Phone Number (210) 822 -0200 Fax Number (2101 820-3361
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name Same As Applicant
Is there a temporary blanket eases t on this property? If so, please provide tti_ iolume 6011 and Page # 246
Acreage - Total Property 13,801 Total # Of Lots 1 R -O -W Acreage 0.20
Existing Use: Primarily vacant Proposed Use: Multi - Family Residential
'umber Of Lots By Zoning District 1 /R-6 / /
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
13.801 /R4 / / /
Floodplain Acreage 0.0
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and approved Master Plan and /or Preliminary Plat (if
applicable):
N/A
Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations & Reason For Same: N/A
Requested Oversize Participation: N/A
Total Linear Footage of Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
Proposed Public:
ACREAGE:
Streets
Sidewalks # of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee
Sanitary Sewer Lines # of acres in floodplain
Water Lines # of acres in detention
Channels # of acres in greenways
Storm Sewers OR
Bike Lanes / Paths FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
236 # of Multi - Family Dwelling Units X $452 = $ 106,672
(date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,
correct, and complete. The un r =rsigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above - identified
final plat and attests that this : N uest does not amend any covenants or restrictions associated with this plat.
-1°111 ( ?)16
Signatur nd Title Date
Regular Agenda 6
Presentation, discussion, and possible
action on: (1) a Variance from Section
8.G.10 Geometric Standards, Street
Design Criteria of the Subdivision
Regulations; and (2) Public Hearing,
presentation, discussion, and possible
action on a Replat of Bald Prairie Lot
1A; and (3) a Final Plat for Edelweiss
Gartens Phase 8, consisting of 46 lots
on 23.87 acres, generally located on the
west side of Renee Lane, southeast of
the extension of Brandenburg Lane,
and south of the extension of Eagle
Avenue. Case #05 -81 (JR /JN)
STAFF REPORT
Project Manager: Jennifer Reeves, Planner Report Date: June 27, 2005
Email: jreeves @cstx.gov Meeting Date: July 7, 2005
Item: Presentation, discussion, and possible action on: (1) a Variance from
Section 8.G.10 Geometric Standards, Street Design Criteria of the Subdivision
Regulations; and (2) Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible
action on a Replat of Bald Prairie Lot 1A; and (3) a Final Plat for Edelweiss
Gartens Phase 8, consisting of 46 Tots on 23.87 acres, generally located on the
west side of Renee Lane, southeast of the extension of Brandenburg Lane, and
south of the extension of Eagle Avenue.
Applicant: Steve Arden, Edelweiss Gartens Venture, Property Owner
Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Replat and Final
Plat as submitted provided that the variance request is approved by the
Commission.
Item Summary: This item is for a Replat of Lot 1A of Bald Prairie Subdivision
and a Final Plat of Edelweiss Gartens, Phase 8, for the development of a single -
family residential subdivision. This final plat includes a 6.018 acre land
dedication for a City Park and the extension of Eagle Avenue, a minor collector
on the Thoroughfare Plan.
The Applicant is requesting a variance to the alley pavement width of 20 feet that
is required in the Subdivision Regulations. The alley pavement width that is
being proposed with this development is 12 feet.
Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan designates this
property and the surrounding area for Single Family Residential - Medium
Density. Eagle Avenue is shown as a minor collector on the Thoroughfare Plan.
The plat is in compliance with the Subdivision Regulations.
Item Background: The property was annexed in 1995 and zoned A -O
Agricultural Open at that time. The property was rezoned to R -1 Single Family
Residential in 2003.
Related Advisory Board Recommendations: The Parks Board accepted land
dedication.
Commission Action Options: The Commission has final authority over the
Replat and Final Plat. The options regarding the plat are:
• Approval
• Denial
Supporting Materials:
1. Location Map
2. Aerial Map
3. Application
4. Variance Request Letter
5. Copy of Rep lat and Final Plat
NOTIFICATION:
Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle; 6-21-05
Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 7-7-05
Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': 15
Response Received: None as of date of staff report
/
'NV ti/ a 7y ,
''''Ar.'. 4010,' . ' 4 c, / '‘. '' ' ''').; ,,,, /
• ti e - _ .. w a
/
f ` F
N O
,,,,, c \-, , i\H111141111100,--444- . / /
liFil" ,,,,,-.. 4, ,
d> ' o, // 00
." •I'CL ,
et
et i , '4111111.6... \ \ ille ■
h
1
01 ..;", * . - ' ,, , --.
Z ` sue \ , ,'� r _ �. `` n.R,,,,�
/ x� A.4 � to `- '" "'� +r. •'�... % C/1
'
N < , i-'=4 �� n ' ti ' . j .11, / 4.1
.1
y
CD
� ., r te 1 \
CC
cn
% " - -,�/ / / �., '''/. / a
pit
b j
,;" f;:ejs \ rye
Ott Csi
. ' ' , < /., „ =1,/ ' 4 7,, ' . ___,, 1:t
,.. ..-.. V. ....!. ,--, 7 .,,,,
CU
'i Q j � �a 42 0 � „/ �� a, , t / 0
lio
V -,, / ,--, , 4 '''' ' , x., ' - ' ' ' 4. 4 ,,,,,,->/-'
:. ,,,_,-„, ..., ,,,,..„.. „.,, 40 \,,1
pa ,f y � � ei � " /
V.
b , },�/�
1111111 ›
. `� r �a h "�, \3715 } 69 cr : 1 r�i
`� vii ,) 4 , ,, 3 it. o
1111 'a
0
I
N � :)
J
i
1 '5 FOR OFFICK USE ONLY
P &Z CASE NO.:
( DATE SUBMITTED: 5 -0
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Planning d' Development Services
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
(Check one) (l Minor 1 1 Amending fl Final 1 1 Vacating ® Replat
($300.00) ($300.00) ($400.00) ($400.00) ($600.00)*
*Includes public hearing fee
The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P&Z Commission consideration.
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
izt Filing Fee (see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets - $55.00 per additional sheet
N/A Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations - $100 (if applicable)
® Development Permit Application Fee of $200.00 (if applicable).
V ® Infrastructure Inspection Fee of $600.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed)
Ei Application completed in full.
N/A Copy of original deed restrictions /covenants for replats (if applicable).
Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.)
® One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and /or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable).
v- 1 Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D.
El A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
t- ® Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable).
N/A Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Rec Board, please provide proof of approval.
Jate of Preapplication Conference:
NAME OF SUBDIVISION EDELWEISS GARTENS, PHASE 8
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot & Block) Edelweiss Gartens, Phase lF
APPLICANT /PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project):
Name Mr. Steve Arden, Edelweiss Gartens Venture
Street Address 311 Cecilia Loop City College Station
State TX Zip Code 77845 E -Mail Address
Phone Number 979 -846 -8788 Fax Number 979 -846 -0652
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name (Same as above)
Street Address City
State Zip Code E -Mail Address
Phone Number Fax Number
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name McClure & Browne Engineering /Surveying, Inc. E -Mail mikem @mcclurebrowne.com
Street Address 1008 Woodcreek Drive
City College Station State TX Zip Code 77845
Phone Number 979 - 693 -3838 Fax Number 979 -693 -2554
6/13/03 1 of 5
Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so, please provide the volume and Page #
Acreage -- Total Property 17.38 acres Total # Of Lots 46 R -O -W Acreage 3.97 acres
xisting Use: Vacant Proposed Use: Residential Subdivision
iJumber of Lots By Zoning District 46 Lots /R - Zoning
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: 0.16 acres /R - Zoning
Floodpiain Acreage None
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and approved Master Plan and /or Preliminary Plat (if
applicable): None
Requested Variances to Subdivision Regulations & Reason For Same: 12' Concrete Alleys to meet the REVISED
STREET GUIDELINES
Requested Oversize Participation: None
Total Linear Footage of Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
Proposed Public:
ACREAGE:
2794 Streets
2955 Sidewalks 6.018 # of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee
2672 Sanitary Sewer Lines -0- # of acres in floodplain
2824 Water Lines 2.775 # of acres in detention
975 Channels -0- # of acres in greenways
2451 Storm Sewers OR
-0- Bike Lanes / Paths FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
# of Single - Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $
(date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,
correct, and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above - identified
final plat and attests that this request does not amend any covenants or restrictions associated with this plat.
5 7 / /
g atur and itle ,4 OdsCTS - A/ A/G, Date f
6/13/03 2 of 5
SUPPLCMENTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT INFORMATION
Application is hereby made for the following development specific site /waterway alterations:
ubdivision construction in the South fork of Lick Creek Drainage Basin
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
I, , design engineer /owner, hereby acknowledge or affirm that:
The information and conclusions contained in the above plans and supporting documents comply with the current
requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and its associated Drainage Policy and Design
Standards. As a condition of approval of this permit application, I agree to construct the improvements proposed in this
application according to these documents and the requirements of Chapter 13 of the College Station City Code.
Property Owner(s) Contractor
CERTIFICATIONS: (for proposed alterations within designated flood hazard areas.)
A.I, certify that any nonresidential structure on or proposed to be on this site
as part of this application is designated to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the
100 year storm.
Engineer Date
B. 1, certify that the finished floor elevation of the lowest floor, including any
lsement, of any residential structure, proposed as part of this application is at or above the base flood elevation
.stablished in the latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Study and maps, as amended.
Engineer Date
C. I, /VI/CNAEL /Q MC G'Lt11L6 , certify that the alterations or development '` �� � i shall
not diminish the flood - carrying capacity of the waterway adjoining or crossing this permitted it A. ∎ >:,. - uc 'a rations
or development are consistent with requirements of the City of College Station City 9. Ch- ' ` r 13 'i erning
encroachments of flood ys and of floodway fringes. > " " "' ° " " "" °" ""' """" " "` I
1 LMICHAEL R. talglE
t fiii +itltlii+iiY.iilitiitl 4
G ,, dL sHos` °. 32740 1. 433
t c� `,f' p =4
En i ee r � �� E � * � ,,
9 Date #��� �. G TEN-
D. I, , do certify that the proposed alterations do not ra �! Hof the 100
year flood above elevation established in the latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Study.
Engineer Date
Conditions or comments as part of approval:
In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure
that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage
facilities. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City
Engineer for the above named project. All of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall
'ply.
6/13/03 3 of 5
McCLURE & BROWNE ENGINEERING /SURVEYING, INC.
1008 Wondcreek Drive, Suite 103 • College Station, Texas 77845
(979) 693 -3838 • Pax (979) 693 -2554 • Email: mc:clurebrowne @vecizon.net
June 29, 2005
Mr. Alan Gibbs
City of College Station
P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Re: Edelweiss Gartens Subdivision, Phase 8 — Variance Request for Alley Widths
Dear Alan:
The developer of Edelweiss Gartens Subdivision, Phase 8 requests that a variance be granted
to the Subdivision Ordinance regarding the width of alleys in this phase. The ordinance currently
requires that paved alleys be 20 feet wide in a 24 foot right -of -way, but we are requesting that a 12
foot wide alley in a 25 foot right -of -way be allowed. The primary reason for making this request is
to take advantage of a rule that is about to be implemented by the City Council in which 12 foot wide
alleys will become the standard width. This rule change is part of an overall revision to the City's
design standards in which many changes will be made. Its approval is anticipated in the next few
weeks.
The variance process requires the Planning & Zoning Commission to find in favor of four
issues before the variance can be approved. I will attempt to address these four issues below.
1. That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict
application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use
of his land.
Response: The special circumstance that will deprive the applicant of reasonable use of his
land is the impending change to the geometric design criteria. The star's of both Bryan and
College Station, along with the local development community, have developed these new
guidelines and agreed that they are appropriate for this type of application. Strict application
of this rule will decrease the amount of area behind each home that can be used for lawns or
plantings that are common on other similar rights -of -way. It will also negatively impact the
economics of the development and give competitive advantages to other developers who are
not required to install the wider alleys following the anticipated rule change.
2. That the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property
right of the applicant.
Response: The additional pavement width of these alleys minimizes the green space behind
the homes without any significant benefit to the public. It diminishes the ability of residents
Mr. Alan Gibbs
Edelweiss Gartens Ph. 8 - Variance Request
Page 2
to enjoy the additional green area and contradicts one of the City's established goals of
encouraging developers to maximize the use of landscaping whenever possible.
3. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare,
or injurious to other property in the area, or to the city in administering this chaper.
Response: The original intent of the wider pavement was to allow access for fire fighting
equipment in these alleys. However, during the development of the new design guidelines, the
staffs in both Bryan and College have agreed that access for fire fighting equipment is available
on the public streets in the front of these homes, just as it is for homes where there are no
alleys. Therefore, the wider alleys are not necessary for fire fighting equipment. There are no
other detriments to the public health, safety, or welfare, nor will the variance be injurious to
other property in the area.
4. That the granting of the variance will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision
of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
Response: The staff at the City of College Station has already agreed that the 12 foot wide
alley is acceptable and will be recommending its adoption to the City Council. This variance
simply allows that rule to be implemented before its formal adoption. It will not have any
negative effect on the orderly subdivision of other land in the area.
On behalf of the developer, I ask that you forward this variance request to the Planning and
Zoning Commission to be considered with the final plat for Phase 8. I also ask for your support in
approval of this variance request for the reasons outlined above. As always, I will be happy to
answer any questions you have regarding this project. Thank you.
Sincerely,
C
Kent Laza, P.E.
Project Administrator
xc: Steve Arden
Regular Agenda 7
Public hearing, presentation,
discussion, and possible action on a
Rezoning for 76.662 acres out of the
Robert Stevenson Survey, A -54,
generally located on the proposed State
Highway 40, across from Castlegate
from R -1 Single Family Residential and
A -O Agricultural Open to PDD
Planned Development District. Case
#05 -68 (MH /CC)
STAFF REPORT
Project Manager: Molly Hitchcock Report Date: May 9, 2005
Email: mhitchcock @cstx.gov Meeting Date: July 7, 2005
Item: Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Rezoning for
76.662 acres out of the Robert Stevenson Survey, A -54, generally located on the
proposed State Highway 40, across from Castlegate from R -1 Single Family Residential
and A -O Agricultural Open to PDD Planned Development District.
Applicant: Wallace Phillips for DDH Investments, Inc.
Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning.
Uses Proposed: Single family residential, public park, and common areas consisting of
open space, landscaped areas, and buffers.
Item Summary: As stated by the applicant, the proposed Planned Development District
is for "a single family integrated residential community with amenities that provide for an
enhanced quality of life ". The PDD District is the only available district that provides for
the meritorious modifications of the regulations that allows for the developer to continue
the development as it was originally envisioned in the Crowley Master Plan (which
included Castlegate) and has been implemented in the previous sections of the
Castlegate Subdivision.
The subject property abuts State Highway 40 to the north, with Castlegate Sections 1
and 2 across the right -of -way. Surrounding the property to the west, north, and east is
undeveloped R -1 Single Family Residential and A -O Agricultural Open, being the main
channel of Spring Creek.
Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan shows the subject area as
medium density single family residential (3 -6 dwelling units per acre) with a small area
of Public /Institutional. Density will be verified at time of platting. The proposed single
family housing is in compliance with the Land Use Plan and the Crowley Master Plan.
The property abuts proposed State Highway 40, a Freeway on the Thoroughfare Plan.
Helmsley, a future minor collector, will traverse this property, eventually linking Victoria
to SH 40.
The applicant is currently working with the Greenways Coordinator to dedicate the
surrounding greenway. The City does not wish to purchase the floodplain shown to
encroach upon the subject property.
Item Background: This area was annexed into the College Station city limits in 1995,
master planned in 1997 with modifications in 1998 and 2001, and was preliminary
platted as one large tract in 2004. The area has not been final platted.
Related Advisory Board Recommendations: If the PDD rezoning is approved, the
Design Review Board will be responsible for the review and approval of the concept
plan.
Supporting Materials:
1. Location Map
2. Aerial Map
3. Application
NOTIFICATION:
Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle; 6 -21 -05 and 6 -28 -05
Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 7 -7 -05
Advertised Council Hearing Dates: 7 -14 -05
Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': 2
Response Received: None as of date of staff report.
INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES
Water: There is an existing 24" water main on the north side of the currently being
constructed SH 40. Water will need to be provided to all subdivided lots.
Sewer: There is an existing 21" sanitary sewer main that divides the proposed rezoned
area.on the south side of Castlegate Drive. Sanitary sewer will need to be provided to
all subdivided Tots.
Streets: Any thoroughfares in this area must be extended to its minimum design
standard.
Off-site Easements: None at this time.
Drainage: Drainage will be to Spring Creek. A regional detention pond was constructed
to offset post - development drainage impacts to downstream areas.
Flood Plain: Development in the flood plain is restricted by flood plain restrictions.
Oversize request: None requested at this time.
Impact Fees: The property is located in the Spring Creek Sewer Impact Fee Area (97-
01). An Impact Fee of $349.55 per Living Unit Equivalent will be due at time of Plat.
/ 1
i / � ` N z
I / / o
/ / fx.
4.
/
Q
Irmo 00..
aromo
ilk
al 1
1
t , 3
„. ‘
N .
-.101
1
C ,,007 3� t $N3nvt1 f
1 y 1 '
. ` ,,
10
ps i �i ,�M W
't c/)
.I
1 ''''.41111111101110004„ ' ldl1. -Bk01::
0
1
1 ,0
t.4. � -
` a h
'G ye . a R
0 04 4,74.,.„„ ,..,,\ ,
s
o. . /
,- S
N o- w'
/
?� ��m d id �
/ \ - 7 4 ,..... lo g 111111 140 a
z
IX
/ r
/ p
zoE- e-o vwa.,w , �, � i ; a
41 „ir .. 1 2:71 : 11 , i 1 1
/
z
FOR O IC�.US ONL
CASE NO U - `
— DATE SUBMITTED (.4
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
L'b:nnrng t '' L)rr r lopm, ii Serf'fre
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING)
FOR PDD / P -MUD
[�PDD ❑ P -MUD
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shall not be filed within
a period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with permission of the Planning & Zoning Commission or
City Council. The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for consideration:
Application completed in full.
$500.00 application fee.
,, Two (2) copies of a fully dimensioned map on 24" x 36" paper showing:
a. Land affected;
b. Legal description of area of proposed change;
c. Present zoning;
d. Zoning classification of all abutting land; and
e. All public and private rights -of -way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land.
j/ Written legal description of subject property (metes & bounds or lot & block of subdivision, whichever is
applicable).
v The attached Rezoning Supporting Information sheet completed in full.
Date of Required Preapplication Conference: q- 27-- Zoo 3 - 7 -
APPLICANT'S INFORMATION:
Name(s) ` W4 ve t'm - k, . Wo..t ick.c ?1 L tips
Street Address It410 city Col t. to jvs
State T X Zip Code 1 �.t '3� E -Mail Address - - J
Phone Number WI (AO Fax Number (17d1) 6:7 ' - (04-1
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name(s) nV €`, 1Y - — t
Street Address 1 14'10 etc, Cr y *1)-r ;t vf.... Cit i lele
'"
State ( Zip Code 1 4 E -Mail Address --- J
Phone Number (T7 '1') OD — 12-SD Fax Number ( °) 62cio- 104-I
This property was conveyed to owner by deed, dated C (f; 2005 and recorded in Volume We() 7
Page (9)8 of the Brazos County Deed Records.
General Location of Property: N10(44" oc Ottte' . S1AL ' i v t St a to Drop & 4-L1r1
Address of Property: 1\b/411 o Sit ,t .. ;VC S1 Ly1 r r7 { yo c ? .c 1+ o
Legal Description: L Z. tC it'QS 001 ct`- �„ 1?-0644- Stoket� va r.( ) t
A - I s
Total Acreage: 1(o L a 2.. 00142
Existing Zoning: kr-i) I 1 - t Requested Zoning: fDt)
Present Use of Property: C.e)-v")+
Proposed Use of Property: ..ua F • Yyvt.�'� t( Q C '1411r:.-t r
, -"13/03 'a0t ! of 2
REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION
1.) List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary.
-fhex . it, a rovrinimzi Avonark-A fy• ,, ,, im,,,, A 4/ CO li -140.4yi
tl'Aithil o r- 6 )1eie Slit-ksay, . litis dekrtiomerd u.,il ble c<ivrt41 aA iv -like.- cdffir 1 ,1.,,...
sAwikr,,i)..n;
41ekt fre-e 4:01,24,- y -et,(-k%sf is PO ivistei.. 1,1 P-( .
2.) Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain
why the Plan is incorrect. - 162- 711) /PM (..vvy CS o Gte lA)IM Itl 6110i
n Wii,itA-■ ShOit/ vneeiiikm detocitt ,6i1. -Fetwutt I 'try{ ufsrt --riv--ks CU'en
ii i , 1
Itp, ' .4 A.' Id 4. &' i' . i kt1 I _ rill -f/lOtttf A oit-3v6iti of airrnylmotip,1„ 4 6
Vet 1 1 - S
r 14 ,"`,Q tirf-e. .
3.) List any other reasons to support this zone change.
`111() i2 has all -1-t,_. 1 miracirlAr iw-f. 1-c Ke.(lato,4,i Sit ⅈ,(.51,,,-1,
C1 d -1114 4-rivie, c;114-24,-.C7 it?ill I Levi) , t4.0 t vial de velcprieAt- it ocf:.0i-
/ c
Please also provide the following information for PDD rezonings:
Statement of purpose and intent of the proposed development: 11 e i.th- r o,,,, „i- (.; f - H 1 .4'S Pi
-- 1)t: vi0CPY1E - 1)1 - 5 - 1 -1c ( 4 ' 1.5 (A cf InLi kil-il ,11-felred-r d residerthal ocro ill i-tftk
iAlt e viAif ', --11W t x bvietc fty ail eriiieuic klei r ..1_,( p Ectie_.
A list of proposed land uses: ” i ....,,- — 0 . , 1 p, t
CeS1A,7 vt Nthishrn of -hirfeezi St - czoatty /0 -i ilk-de6 h 0-yla (a, oci iffra
w1ciA4k plitigtiC pekAi- a inA et)Pvi-bvirr-vi gA-ea s Coy) 7,5'7C1,5 vf ere ki ';f6te-e,,
La..ociscap-ed etheAS airvd 6A-t-freAs.
,
The applicant has prepared this application and supporting information and certifies that the facts stated
herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correct. IF APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER
THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A POWER OF
ATTORNEY STATEMENT FROM THE OWNER.
-06
o )
I N .
S ignature .. ,e /: el iSC i g d 37/11*5-f : ?51 , Z ej ■ ;?
ignature of owner or ap pr !cant Dater'
6/13/03 Page 2 of 2
Regular Agenda 8
Public hearing, presentation,
discussion, and possible action on a
Replat of Lot 6, Block 2 of the Autumn
Chase Subdivision, consisting of 19 lots
and 2 common areas on 5.64 acres,
generally located west of Cornell Drive
between Brentwood Drive and Manuel
Drive. Case #05 -85 (JPICC)
STAFF REPORT
Project Manager: Jennifer Prochazka, Planner Report Date: June 27, 2005
Email: jrochazka@cstx.gov Meeting Date: July 7, 2005
Item: Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Replat
of Lot 6, Block 2 of the Autumn Chase Subdivision, consisting of 19 lots and 2
common areas on 5.64 acres, generally located west of Cornell Drive between
Brentwood Drive and Manuel Drive.
Applicant: Veronica Morgan, P.E., Mitchell and Morgan, agent for Autumn
Chase, LP, Property Owner.
Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Replat.
Item Summary: This item is for consideration of a Replat of Lot 6, Block 2, into
19 R -4 Multi - Family Residential lots. Lots 3 -6, Block 4, and Lots 6 and 9 -13,
Block 3, are proposed to be duplex lots. Duplex lots which provide side or rear
parking may have a reduced lot width of 60 feet. All duplex lots proposed in this
subdivision will have side or rear parking. The remaining 9 lots are proposed for
triplex and fourplex development.
Approval of the Replat will relocate multiple Public Utility Easements that were
dedicated with the original plat. There are currently no utilities in these
easements and all franchisees and City departments have approved the
relocation.
Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan designates this area
as Residential High Density and Cornell Drive is shown as a major collector on
the Thoroughfare Plan. The Replat is in compliance with the Subdivision
Regulations.
Item Background: The subject property was annexed in 1969 and was zoned
R -5 Apartment / Medium Density at that time. The zoning designation was
changed to R -4 Multi - Family in 2003 with the adoption of the Unified
Development Ordinance. The subject property was platted in 2004.
Development of other lots in the original subdivision is currently underway.
Related Advisory Board Recommendations: The Parks Board recommends
fee in lieu of land dedication.
Commission Action Options: The Commission has final authority over the
Replat. The options regarding the Replat are:
• Approval
• Denial
Supporting Materials:
1. Location Map
2. Aerial Map
3. Application
4. Copy of Replat
NOTIFICATION:
Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle; 6 -21 -05
Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 7 -7 -05
Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': 28
Response Received: None as of date of staff report
u
��c�b
ploolor- ,,
c V
V f, , ' r �v
�� E 1
w � iC4t h t 9 � � b Tr/ Z
i `v Y \ • . l � n om \ '?
k.s 124
s
n� ` / �qp q p8 V °o � s ''j' ' ' ly
'' U i > /l l rca ' 514 I' ,, r ,40b ` dn� \ �` ° � 6 ' 4F' i /
., /o,. �' , 2 4 � ' \ - V "' / / '
- • /
/ l C �� \ \ \ ' q- / "" / 1 C' / i
r \ � y �� '
h
M
C ?
\ 4 C
r 4� �C�
J
P , <ti\ _ N ''h , / , v V I ra n
/ c,,,, 7 •'� ; � l / '� / '
� , V'A "'\ (i �� - , , cC
Oft L x
r �_ ' ' -2' / 1 �a
�ti1
/ b,<\) C9` .„ 8U! / i N
` r , i 1
1
C,' , \ ' , �_A S-
/ , 1' ' c L'' ... 1 ,,,, \ \ , # '
W
z
\ ., / \ >g r-< ' ' ///~ / -
./..„6-66. /-\\ .— / .-\ , , ,\ ,..
U ,, / G n 4e �, / \ h�
s / ,1( / \
% ti
4 y m ° 7 v/ f /z, Q 5� b r)'
1 j ��
o
°✓ �, % 0 °i C61
/ " / �¢/ ` s S ri / / `1: �`l 0 ii
�. �, M / ,- ' of ,, 0`) � • s // / / / ,'� S_ °U> / 9 L ad
T A
-'.f. / / / N. `��r, "� / N 1 t7, / A ��
`i / / /. %Y / co // °`O,a J :� �'� ,�' r��- // 7 x / �' \ /� / ^7 1
c / / ^� / `f'lj / \ a ' 0 • " �� •a- S` `bp
N
Cdr / 2.c., / a c^�r 2v / / n'� Cd
, / r /�► �
Z O E F O W U q' / / ' 7 r` 0 , V ' r�j r 1""1
i n 7, /
Z 7 \
-r, / / kill, ,-
N
Ck
FOR OFFI §t1E
`�� P &Z CASE NO.: �✓
to6 : �
‘ DATE SUBMITTED: A0
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
Planning d' Development Services
FINAL PLAT
APPLICATION Vj*
(Check one) ❑ Minor C Amending ❑ Final ❑ Vacating X1 Replat
($300.00) ($300.00) ($400.00) ($400.00) ($600.00)*
*Includes public hearing fee
The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P&Z Commission consideration.
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
N/A Filing Fee (see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets - $55.00 per additional sheet
N/A Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations — $100 (if applicable)
y Development Permit Application Fee of $200.00 (if applicable).
N/A Infrastructure Inspection Fee of $600.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed)
NI Application completed in full.
N/A Copy of original deed restrictions /covenants for replats (if applicable).
�1 Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.)
N/A One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and /or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable).
Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D.
J A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
J Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable).
J Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of
approval (if applicable).
Date of Preapplication Conference:
NAME OF SUBDIVISION Autumn Chase Subdivision
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot & Block) Lots 1 -13, Block 3 and Lots 1 -6, Block 4
APPLICANT /PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project):
Name Veronica Morgan, PE
Street Address 511 University Drive East, Suite 204 City College Station
State TX Zip Code 77840 E -Mail Address vCmitchellandmorgan.com
Phone Number 979- 260 -6963 Fax Number 979- 260 -3564
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name Dan Bensimon
Street Address 5810 Tom Wooten Drive City Austin
State TX Zip Code 78731 E -Mail Address dbensimon(cswbell.net
Phone Number 512 - 338 -1225 Fax Number 512 - 795 -8431
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name Veronica Morgan, PE
Street Address 511 University Drive East, Suite 204 City College Station
State TX Zip Code 77840 E -Mail Address v@mitchellandmorgan.com
Phone Number 979 - 260 -6963 Fax Number 979 - 260 -3564
6/13/03 1 of 5
Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so, please provide the Volume N/A and Page # N/A
Acreage - Total Property 5.64 ac Total # Of Lots 19 R -O -W Acreage _ 1 a 1 $ ,
Existing Use: Vacant Proposed Use: Duplexes /Fourplexes
Number Of Lots By Zoning District 19 / R -4 / /
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
.21 /R-4 / / /
Floodplain Acreage 0
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and approved Master Plan and /or Preliminary Plat (if
applicable):
N/A
Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations & Reason For Same: N/A
Requested Oversize Participation: N/A
Total Linear Footage of Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
Proposed Public:
ACREAGE: N/A
1182_ Streets
913_ Sidewalks N/A # of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee
807_ Sanitary Sewer Lines N/A # of acres in floodplain
885_ Water Lines N/A # of acres in detention
0 Channels N/A # of acres in greenways
337 Storm Sewers OR
0 Bike Lanes / Paths FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
N/A # of Single- Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $
(date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,
correct, and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above - identified
fin plat and attests that this request does not amend any covenants or restrictions associated with this plat.
I; v
• �r
Signature and Ti ". Date
9
6/13/03 2 of 5
Regular Agenda 9
Public hearing, presentation,
discussion and possible action on a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment by
amending the Land Use Plan for 1000
Spring Loop and vicinity. The
proposed area is bound by Spring
Loop, University Drive East and
Tarrow Street. The proposed land use
plan classifications include a
combination of Residential Attached,
Office and Regional Retail from a
combination of Single - family
Residential High Density, Office and
Regional Retail. Case #05 -77 (TF)
STAFF REPORT
Prepared by: Trey Fletcher, AICP, Sr. Planner Report Date: 6 -06 -2005
Email: tletcher@cstx.gov Meeting Date: 7 -07 -2005
Item: Public hearing, presentation, discussion and possible action on a Comprehensive
Plan Amendment by amending the Land Use Plan for 1000 Spring Loop and vicinity.
The proposed area is bound by Spring Loop, University Drive East and Tarrow Street.
The proposed land use plan classifications include a combination of Residential
Attached, Office and Regional Retail from a combination of Single- family Residential
High Density, Office and Regional Retail. (05 -77)
Applicant: Mr. Alton Ofczarzak, Property Owner
Item Summary: This item is for the consideration of an amendment to the land use plan.
The property owner has requested that the land use plan be changed from Regional
Retail and Single- family High Density to Residential Attached, affecting 4.7 acres. In
evaluating this application, the study area was expanded to consider the state of the
and use plan in the larger study area.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment as presented, and described as follows:
• Amend the TAMU System tracts located at the corner of Tarrow Street and
Spring Loop from Single- family Residential High Density and Regional Retail to
Office.
• Amend multi - family tracts along Spring Loop from Single - family Residential High
Density to Residential Attached.
• Amend the subject parcel, being 1000 Spring Loop, from Single- family
Residential High Density and Regional Retail to Residential Attached.
Item Background: This comprehensive plan amendment application has been filed in
response to a denied rezoning request from A -P to R -4. Among the reasons cited was
non - compliance with the Future Land Use Plan. In response to this application, the City
of College Station is taking the opportunity to expand the study area and assess the land
use plan.
The Land Use Plan has not changed in this area since the Comprehensive Plan was
adopted in 1997. The following chart shows a breakdown of the future land use plan
classifications in the Study Area, based on existing and proposed conditions.
Future Land Use Plan Existing Proposed
Number Percent Number Percent
of Acres Total of Acres Total of
Retail Regional 33.98 72.8% 27.45 58.8%
S.F. Residential High Density 7.81 16.8% '-f . '' Residential Attached 10.69 22.9%
Office 0.57 1.2% 4.22 9.0%
Floodplain & Streams 4.28 9.2% 4.28 9.2%
Total 46.65 100.0% 46.64 100.0%
Existing land uses in the area consist primarily of retail commercial and office uses that
compliment the corridor's position as a primary gateway into College Station and TAMU.
Much of the development that is occurring in the area, particularly east of East Tarrow
Street has taken place since 2000, and is ongoing. Several parcels in the study area are
currently undergoing development, redevelopment, or modifications. New construction
includes Comfort Suites, AudioVideo and the former State Farm Service Center is being
redeveloped as David Gardner Jewelers. University Title is undergoing modifications.
University Town Center is under development on the south side of University Drive East.
Multi- family residential uses line both sides of Spring Loop and are served by the
University's transit system.
Breakdown of Existing Land Use Land Number Percent
Use of
Code of Acres Total
Multi- Family 130 4.15 9.0%
Commercial - Retail 210 17.34 37.4%
Commercial - Office 220 15.48 33.4%
Transportation / Utilities / Communications 500 0.17 0.4%
Unimproved 920 9.18 19.8%
Total 46.32 100.0%
The current zoning pattern in the area is shown in the table below; the majority of the
Study Area is zoned C -1, General Commercial.
Current Zoning Pattern Number Percent of
of Acres Total
A - P 12.62 27.1%
C - 1 27.17 58.3%
R - 4 6.82 14.6%
Total 46.62 100.0%
The previous Comprehensive Plan designated a combination of Medium Density
Residential, Office Commercial and Retail Commercial. The Medium Density Residential
designation included both sides of Spring Loop. According to the Development Guide
land use policies (adopted in 1990) medium density residential areas could consist of a
variety of housing types, including, but not limited to apartments, townhomes and
duplexes. Gross densities were not to exceed 14 to 16 units per acre.
Also of consideration in the assessment of this request is the University Drive Corridor
Study, which was adopted in June, 1991. The purpose of this study was to review the
recommendations of the 1985 University Drive Land Use Study to see if modifications
should be made, and the Council's emphasis "that University Drive [was] the last major
thoroughfare in the City that [was] still largely undeveloped and that Staff should keep in
mind its function as an entryway into the City when reviewing the 1985 study."
Two of the eleven 1985 land use and zoning recommendations related to this request,
as follows:
• The existing land uses reflected on the Land Use Plan on the north side of
University from Tarrow east to Spring Loop were appropriate.
• Tract C should be left as R -4 or rezoned to A -P.
Tract C, shown at right, referred to a 3.219-
1 P. II 011 WO .�,,, �,.��
acre tract east of the subject tract. The R -4� ,
zoning remained until 2001 when an ► 4
application for A -P zoning was initiated by the �t _--'�` � 11114 `
property owner. Unlike the subject tract, this
tract has no access or frontage to Spring Loop. A
The primary result of the University __-'
k. -----.--
- „, A,„,,:_.--, ,,„
Corridor Study was the creation of an Overlay ' -
District that remains in effect today. According ' ��
to the Study, "the properties affected by this ,,, , i
� �y
district would be those with frontage along `' " �� � � av ` ;
University Drive." The Overlay was designed ; 2 ' ,';
to increase building and parking setbacks and 1 , - _ R.q '.`' ✓ / - '
increase landscaping requirements without
changing the uses allowed on properties currently zoned appropriately. Among the
additional recommendations identified in the Study were as follows:
• The existing land uses reflected on the Land Use Plan on the north side of
University Drive from Tarrow Street east to Spring Loop [were] still appropriate.
These consist[ed] of commercial and office uses and medium density residential
uses. As in the original study, limit areas reflected on the land use plan for multi-
family to R -3 or R -4 with A -P as a possible alternative; leave Tract C as R -4 or
rezone it to A -P.
The range of permitted residential densities would change as a result of the proposed
land use plan changes. A summary of the existing and proposed conditions is as follows,
where existing refers to the range of dwelling units shown on the land use plan, and
proposed refers to the amended plan advocated by staff:
Density Existing Proposed
Acres Dwelling Units Acres Dwelling Units
SF Res High 7.81 49 - 63 0 0
(7 -9)
Residential
Attached 0 0 10.69 100 -200
(10 -20)
The Single- family density is based on net density, and the residential attached is based
on gross density. There are 76 multi - family dwelling units in the study area. Located
along Spring Loop, this number of existing dwelling units exceeds what is proposed by
the current and use plan.
Spring Loop is classified as a Major Collector on the Thoroughfare Plan with a volume
range of 5,000 to 10,000 vehicles per day. Based on recent traffic counts, Spring Loop
currently carries about 8,000 vehicles per day. Based on the proposed land use plan, the
residential attached land use area could accommodate up to 175 residential units (76
exist). Using common trip generation rates, the amended plan would potentially result in
approximately 650 additional trips per day based on new dwelling units. When
considering that some of these trips would be accommodated by the TAMU transit
service, the total traffic on Spring Loop would be about 8,600 vehicles per day.
It should be noted that there is a significant amount of traffic that uses Spring Loop as an
alternate route between University Drive and Tarrow Street during the morning and
afternoon peak hours. Because the development of multi - family attached units would
primarily serve college students, and the commuting patterns of college students are
different from the traditional morning and afternoon peaks, staff believes that this
additional traffic would be handled by the transportation system without significant
adverse impacts.
Budgetary and Financial Summary: N/A
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Aerial Map
3. Application
4. Existing / Proposed Land Use Plan designations
NOTIFICATION:
Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle; 6 -21 -05 and 6 -28 -05
Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 7 -7 -05
Advertised Council Hearing Dates: 7 -14 -05
Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners within 200': 77
Responses Received: 2
� � ��,A
CI 6� �ti � r t � 1 t ~ c� :::::::, LL �..
1
ti `` `t r . > 12'' ,§ a 7 --, U
`ry :? v ;
�`.1, � �. ' � �cn f , c; 1 6Z5 \
cr ., �' �`� C� - / «-5 A
�1� ° ; . tit' Q
•
• �- .� v `� ti �q we ' z �.Co.
q
Cl„ ,O
c-
! ti � c�
�
-
> ti-,
- 1
I CZ
d �►
c10 1112 icii4 2 \/ \ � s Al)U � � /
Po
O
- a
r 1 /
_ V / Cr,
i ^ �
it ~\ r-� ' �' <'� /� 1�"1
/ �� Qty L
�-
rr � C Ik xr a 1 / , . ,---- r, ..,\ _. L,,, : ,,,- ,_,,- ii_. F'
i
/
/
- 1 QL c7 (---, , 5- a
y
c�5 hTh % -' /�+i
,.., :::3 \ ‘
i
A
�, �,
bk
cf -� /
1 / , _ _ ----.....---- P..-- .//
, / cd
I
z¢F Fo ��<�W 1 -
J
. IR I L '-
CA* r
OFFICE US. Y
(
Case No. FOR v✓ 1
CI FY OF COLLEGE STATION Date Submitted 5-G1.-C6
Pl rnning d Development Servieer
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION
(Check all applicable) 0 Land Use Amendment ❑ Thoroughfare Amendment
❑ alignment / location
❑ classification
The following items must be submitted by the established deadline dates for consideration:
$850 application and review fee
C Two (2) copies of a fully dimensioned map on 24" X 36" paper showing:
a. Land affected;
b. Present zoning of property and zoning classification of all abutting properties;
c. Current land use plan classification and proposed land use plan changes;
d. Current land use classification of all abutting property;
e. Current and proposed thoroughfare alignments
General location and address of property;
a ' Total acres of property; and
All applicable Comprehensive Plan Amendment Request form(s) completed in full.
The following information must be completed before an application is accepted for review.
APPLICANT INFORMATION:
(if different from owner, a complete affidavit shall be required)
Name: E -mail:
Street Address: ..'
City: --12( t t P.41, State: \L. Zip Code
Phone Number: ( 1 j u s '4-- Fax Number: - )
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name: /1) : E -mail:
Street Address:
City: State: Zip Code:
Phone Number: Fax Number:
6/13/03 Page 3 of
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM
The following is required if an amendment to the Land Use Plan is requested. Based on the nature and
extent of the requested amendment, additional studies may be required. Attach additional sheets if
necessary.
. ,
Current Land Use Plan designation: ,,,,..i ,„ -_,A 1 : : 0 ,t ifj)t),t "e4 i -
Requested Land Use Plan designation:
„.- -
( R.€ 5 i r e i e v .E E c., t dAff
Explain the reason for this Land Use Plan amendment i - - A., -
,
t . ' .
•,i i, •k
Identify what conditions have changed to warrant a change in the-land use plan designation:
,
1 ..S ch.- /Vt. 0\ 4 c- L.-I -t--- LY ot <- - 1/4.".. c, 1 . 0 1 V -t tc, ID 144
1
pet ti - • -... v.-- Vt. 5
HA does the requested land use designation further the goals and objectives of the City of
College Station Comprehensive Plan? , -- t :4._ - --t 1 4. 't ,,, k ' ' ' .'(
. , I
' , ' -':‘ L "
Explain why the requested land use designation is more,appropriate than the gxisti n g
designation. f - -- ''' ),„_,/z
The applicant h. prepare this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached
hereto are tru • 'correct
•-■ ----
) c--22,- 0
Signature a t" i - Date
6/13/03 Page 4 of 5
Regular Agenda 10
Public hearing, presentation,
discussion, and possible action on a
Replat for the Willow Branch &
Oakwood Schools Plat consisting of 2
of lots on approximately 19 acres
generally located at the intersection of
Anderson and George Bush Drive.
Case #05 -99 (LB /JN)
STAFF REPORT
Project Manager: Lindsay Boyer Report Date: June 24, 2005
Email: Iboyer @cstx.gov Meeting Date: July 7, 2005
Item: Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Replat
for the Willow Branch & Oakwood Schools Plat consisting of 2 of Tots on
approximately 19 acres generally located at the intersection of Anderson and
George Bush Drive.
Applicant: Kerr Surveying, for the owner, College Station I.S.D.
Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the replat as
submitted.
Item Summary: The proposed replat is for the College Station I.S.D. Willow
Branch and Oakwood School Sites subdivision. An additional lot will be created
by this replat at the corner of George Bush Drive and Anderson Street for the
Justice of the Peace complex. The new lot is approximately 1.46 acres.
Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Comprehensive Plan indicates this
area as Institutional. The property is currently zoned R -1 which is in compliance
with the Comprehensive Plan.
The Thoroughfare Plan indicates George Bush Drive as a major arterial, and
Anderson Street as a major collector. There is no additional Right -Of -Way
dedication needed with this replat. The proposed lot currently takes access from
Anderson Street.
The existing floodplain will remain on the C.S.I.S.D. property.
This plat is in compliance with the Subdivision Regulations.
Item Background: The subject property was annexed in 1954 and zoned R -1
accordingly. There has been no change in zoning since its annexation. The
property was platted by the C.S.I.S.D. in 1999.
Budgetary & Financial Summary: N/A
Related Advisory Board Recommendations: N/A
Commission Action Options: The Commission has final authority over the
Final Plat. The options regarding the final plat are:
• Approval with conditions;
• Approval as submitted; or
• Denial.
Supporting Materials:
1. Location Map
2. Aerial Map
3. Application
4. Copy of Final Plat
NOTIFICATION:
Legal Notice Publication: The Eagle; 6-21-05
Advertised Commission Hearing Date: 7-07-05
Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': 46
Response Received: 9
\ .
/ /
AJ
- -Z." ----,. / ') ..., --, , .0,, f / \ \ , \ \ ......
(N. - ' / ') \ / NN
- - - , ---- ''""- / ,,,-,,‘,J*f",,,,,/ fr- / X. / —
- - --- -..._ / ° CV ., ->-', / \ \ /
"-, ,-, ■,,-. - ,1? / • ' 0 , ';', <N , i ' V
/ , \
•-•
/ \ •-4
/
Z 1
/ / 1 '<
.,.., zy c.3., ..- // /1
ii: C34
Ch '
> \ / L'Vl / /
t•-• & 'Th
/ /1; /// .:.- / / /
93
/7 / in
/ / --
/
..,""
v 0
, N "' i ,--• <1,..., / / ' A "
'-- 1 '':"
.... , ,-... r...., /
- 1 7 / / / / ' ;' / `.. C..) /
-,
/ ,,,, 091 .5/i / ,,,, 4. /
NI CV
"--- ..,„,,1 `,.", /
_
/ / '''-'
.') q '
‘\ t" ---- ''
3,, 1 (- N --- _ , ,.N' 4; 4 ,: , k k '.. g
I* / -- '-' ' ,.., / _ ,,,,
/\\,
- ''.
•k< "/ 0\ '`\
`‘ f'''1 ON
" , ; 1
/ .'t.-
, k-, i 4 \ ,-,.„ e 0-- ,,,,,,,,:, -,,,/ •,.
,, - /A>, -, :-/./.\>,., , . , / A cz
.,',,, .,-., - / ,. ?5 e • )
,
, •y- t‘ , U ,-) \‘",/ , /.V.-„, , ,„ ;„ , ",/,' \ \ '‘, / ,....,
4 40' , , / , a, 2‘.,
Q / •,.. ;:‘'h , '' ,--) ',: Cy ' ,,,, / ''' 4 AV I
<,..,,, (4 '''',,,,› 1 ''''' C- ,,, ,„_. - - ■-- ( ,,, '/ ' fik, . ..„ ,,,,, _ CA
/ 'T / ‘1.h W O / ■4 '- z / \
/ / ,,,,,' A qr., , ,S , ., , ., '.:•.• ,,,/
/ 4 ) 44Y11.1*
,-. 41 )16, ' '-`"-.., / `..',.;? / '/',/ ''''c' ,' / \ • - ......■■•
/ ' ' / , \, 1 -- L ''''' - /',,,S f 9; \ \ rip •
),- ,z \
\ / ' " /(9, / 0! C '2,1 :..., / \ ‘ ' P ., ./.<'-, ''■, ,.
'''' ,/ cr, / / ^ -,-, ___ -, ,,,R4 ' •• 4 "..'" ' ' .' C3' -;:p
'.°/ ' '' -- i C. / L. 'N - , \‘:' ^ '''' -:•:' ',..',/ , q-,, , .1,.. . \
4 , .' / ' ', / "-•----., ' ' 3 ' ,„) ''.- /...?....
' , \ - ''',,, '',' •f - 7,, / \ )„, \<:' ''' ,,,,,, .... `,,,‘
' / c, / \ ‘,%‘' 4 ----„, A, \ —_ ,;
0
i-h-i
C..)
/ <\ -,-•\‘'
-„, ,, - ,
4' \ \ ,V ,..,- 'c;
/ / \\
i"
'') ,..,.. , \ • A \ '..,
\ G , \ '
y ..
l . /
..,
\ / /
Ili
...
,,
\ 0
, \
../.\
,,.•\\.--- >, -,,,' s')
', ,,,,.
,
\
\ II I " I I I I I l i I I F v P - , /
/< C C= ..&)■ '1C ''''
■---; %
,.., „, , N ..............
■ „„,.. ..b ,_ ,. ., ; .„ --> - 4 _,
0
4.
/ 0
, R__ ,.,
<,/
<2> 1
.,..,, ,
tal
, Th 4 ,,,, C CO
'1 ■":° 1, cNi A , ••■1
\ \ -
\I-
,s„, ,,,, \ o'b \ <, %s
CI.,)
\
er:1
0 --\ , ,
\\ c---,.. \ co?
,, "
0
.
., bi)
...
1
\
$' 7,1, \ , \ M
` : \/,
ZOE- FO cf7Q.C-1W
E. 1:
z au=
c: \
el
,4r
:
,
fk r1111114141
FOR OFFICA�USE ONNL�Y
P8Z CASE NO.: `tl `
DATE SUBMITTED: LQ ° lY ' DLI
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION t5
Planning d Development Service,
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
(Check one) Er Minor ❑ Amending ❑ Final ❑ Vacating ❑ Replat
($300.00) ($300.00) ($400.00) ($400.00) ($600.00)'
*Includes public hearing fee
The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P82 Commission consideration.
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
✓Filing Fee (see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets - $55.00 per additional sheet
NH Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations -- $100 (if applicable)
u fl Development Permit Application Fee of $200.00 (if applicable).
N Infrastructure inspection Fee of $600.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed)
✓'Application completed in full.
NIA Copy of original deed restrictions /covenants for replats (if applicable).
Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.)
t.i P One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and /or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable).
y''Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D.
V A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
N 1 Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable).
Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of
approval (if applicable).
Date of Preapplication Conference:
NAME OF SUBDIVISION A, arhr art ' , .. i At ra s ,u10 1 <
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot & Block) L * 1 T?,t. k 1
APPLICANT /PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project):
Name Kerr ?V(V e rV3
Street Address 3C5 - (,I'?Urch 6±• City 6 (( 0-4
State t t. Zip Code U O E -Mail Address iout5e -ci5c r62 veil eA.Dri . fief
Phone Number ,R6 ~,i( Fax Number (Al- inoct
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name Q (fey 'ff c r I. S :AD
' ,/1i__
Street Address I �1 , (tJP,1 >i� City C',((P8* 'i a' -,
State TY. Zip Code 77 g E -Mail Address
Phone Number -- 7/,4 - 6400 Fax Number
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name
Street Address City
State Zip Code E -Mail Address
Phone Number Fax Number
6!13/03 1 of 5
Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so, please provide the Volume and Page #
Acreage -- Total Property Q ., ?, _ Total It Of Lots ._.; R-O -W Acreage ,&J
Existing Use: `x'.h t1 - _ __ —_— Proposed Use:
Number Of Lots By Zoning District / / /
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
/ / / /
Floodplain Acreage troy(.
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and approved Master Plan and /or Preliminary Plat (if
applicable):
Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations & Reason For Same:
Requested Oversize Participation:
Total Linear Footage of Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
Proposed Public:
ACREAGE:
Streets
Sidewalks # of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee
Sanitary Sewer Lines # of acres in floodplain
Water Lines # of acres in detention
Channels # of acres in greenways
Storm Sewers OR
Bike Lanes / Paths FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
# of Single - Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $
(date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,
correct, and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above - identified
final plat and attests that this request does not amend any covenants or restrictions associated with this plat.
A , ,61 1 , 117.4 i:)
Signature and Title Date
6/13/03 2 of 5
Regular Agenda 11
Presentation, discussion, and possible
action on variances from Section 13 -B
Streets, Section 13 -C Lot Width, and
Section 12 -J.2.1 Utility Layout of the
Subdivision Regulations for Indian
Lakes Phase IX, and presentation,
discussion, and possible action on a
Preliminary Plat for Indian Lakes
Phase IX consisting of 42 lots on 14.65
acres generally located southeast of the
intersection of Indian Lakes Drive and
Arapaho Ridge Drive. Case #05 -83
(MH /AG)
STAFF REPORT
Project Manager: Molly Hitchcock Report Date: June 27, 2005
Email: mhitchcock @cstx.gov Meeting Date: July 7, 2005
Item: Presentation, discussion, and possible action on variances from Section 13 -B
Streets, Section 13 -C Lot Width, and Section 12 -J.2.1 Utility Layout of the Subdivision
Regulations for Indian Lakes Phase IX, and presentation, discussion, and possible
action on a Preliminary Plat for Indian Lakes Phase IX consisting of 42 Tots on 14.65
acres generally located southeast of the intersection of Indian Lakes Drive and Arapaho
Ridge Drive.
Applicant: Travis Martinek, agent for Smiling Mallard Development, Ltd.
Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat if the
variance requests are granted by the Commission.
Item Summary: This item is for consideration of several variance requests to the
Subdivision Regulations and a preliminary plat for a new section of the Indian Lakes
development that will provide smaller single - family lots in a gated community. Several
variance requests and the construction of a wastewater package treatment plant will be
needed for such a development to occur, thus the applicant would like the Commission
to consider the variance requests now instead of at final plat. The following table
summarizes the variances needed:
Subdivision Requirement Variance
Regulations Requested
S ection
13 -B Streets ROW width of 70 feet ROW width of 28 feet
10 -foot shoulders no shoulders
13 -C Lot Width 100 feet 34.05 feet to 98.48 feet
12 -J.2.1 Utility Layout 20 -ft. utility easement at front or 10 feet at front of lot and 10 feet
rear of lot or 10 feet at rear when at (unabutting) rear of lot
Tots abut each other
The applicant has provided information regarding these items in his application
submittal (attached). The submittal also includes several other variance requests that
do not apply:
• Front, rear, and side lot setbacks —the City does not enforce setbacks in the
ETJ.
• Maximum dwelling units per acre and lot size — minimum lot sizes are
recommended in the County for the construction of septic systems. As a
wastewater treatment facility is being proposed for this development, individual
lots will not need septic systems.
------- -II■
4 _____ _ ___
Es
c;) 4 \ _ j WUj
Cl-
t 1 _.— _.-----: ___
A 1 --- ,,
pi .. ocoin.
ii . ______
ii
ri i tt li ...t. 0°2
qt. v• ** =cm
...i 0 1 0 4.. *este 440, Lcc)J
moo - #41 ..... *rims .„„„,, 1 1, Le _. 44 , 4 . ....... <,.
3
mote , E
1 0,,,P% "Ai& z
tarAirsir
r _._ MIIIIINNII■
Li
L I
4 4
L L*J j
Z - -- - 1 - ■ 1 ',-.. 3 # .
4c,"
If the variances and plat are approved by the Commission, it will still be necessary for
the applicant to request variances from the County Subdivision Regulations and plat
approval from the County Commissioners Court. The County Commissioner's Court
will be considering variances to the front and side utility easement widths and front and
side setbacks.
Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan shows most of the land in
the ETJ to be developed at a rural density (very low density residential development
with agricultural and support uses). The City does not control land use in the county,
but does share platting authority.
Item Background: This area was formerly part of Indian Lakes Phase 4 (vacated June
22, 2005). The City and the developer agree that the increase in density from the rest
of the Indian Lakes development warrants this proposal to be a new project.
Commission Action Options Regarding the Variance Requests: The Commission
must consider each variance request prior to approving the preliminary plat. The
options for each variance request are:
• Approval or
• Denial.
Commission Action Options Regarding the Preliminary Plat:
The Commission has final authority over the preliminary plat. The options regarding the
preliminary plat are:
• Approval with conditions;
• Approval as submitted; or
• Denial.
Supporting Materials:
1. Location Map
2. Aerial Map
3. Application
4. Variance Request Letter
5. Infrastructure and Facilities
6. Copy of Preliminary Plat
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
P&Z CASE NO.: (35. ii
COLLEGE STATION DATE SUBMITTED: 1 (4. U
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION
The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P & Z Commission
consideration.
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
X Filing Fee of $400.00.
X Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations $100 (if applicable)
X Application completed in full.
X Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A revised mylar original must be submitted after staff review.)
N/A One (1) copy of the approved Master Plan if applicable.
X A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
N/A Rezoning Application if zone change is proposed.
N/A Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of
approval (if applicable).
Date of Preapplication Conference: Unknown
NAME OF SUBDIVISION: Villages of Indian Lakes Phase IX
.,PECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION: Southeast of intersection between Indian Lakes
Drive and Arapaho Ridge Drive, formerly Phase 1, Block 9, Lots 1, 2A, 2B, 3, & 4.
APPLICANT /PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project):
Name: Travis Martinek
Street Address: 3608 East 29 Street, Suite 100 City: Bryan
State: Texas Zip Code: 77802 E -Mail Address: travis @clarkewyndham.com
Phone Number: (979) 846 -4384 Fax Number: (979) 846 -1461
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (ALL owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for
multiple owners):
Name: Smiling Mallard Development, Ltd.
Street Address: 3608 East 29' Street, Suite 100 City: Bryan
State: Texas Zip Code: 77802 E -Mail Address: travis @clarkewyndham.com
Phone Number: (979) 846 -4384 Fax Number: (979) 846 -1461
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name: McClure & Browne, Inc.
Street Address: 1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103 City: College Station
State: Texas Zip Code: 77845 E -Mail Address: mikem @mcclurebrowne.com
Phone Number: (979) 693 -3838 Fax Number: (979) 693 -2554
6/13/03 1 of 1
Total Acres Of Subdivision: 74.65 R -O -W Acreage: 1.62 (Private Drive ROW)
Total # Of Lots: 42
lumber Of Lots By Zoning District: N/A
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: N/A
Floodplain Acreage: 0.00
Parkland dedication by acreage or fee? N/A
A statement addressing any differences between the Preliminary Plat and approved Master Plan (if applicable)
None
Requested variances to subdivision regulations & reason for same: SEE ATTACHMENT A
Requested oversize participation: None
Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
ACREAGE:
# of Acres to be dedicated # of acres in floodplain
# of acres in detention # of acres in greenways
OR
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
# of Single - Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $
(date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits
attached hereto are true and correct. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of
College Station of the above identified plat and attests that all respective owners have been identified
on this application.
,p/77,4±.. 51/ t/Of
Travis Martinek Date
Design & Construction Manager
6/13/03 2 of 2
Attachment A
VARIANCE REQUEST
Basis of Request
From its inception, the Villages of Indian Lakes has been a community designed around the central theme
of conservation and enjoyment of our natural environment. Our mission is to provide our client families
with an opportunity to live in a community that allows them to experience nature through outdoor activities
like hiking, biking, fishing, boating, and wildlife watching. Until now, our land planning efforts have
focused on providing families with large acreage home sites. Based on experience and market study, we
have found a large group of potential clients who wish to experience what The Village of Indian Lakes has
to offer in the way of amenities, but do not want large acreage home sites that they must personally
maintain. Phase IX, also known as The Settlement, was designed in response to the alternative lifestyle
mentioned above. With Phase IX we have packaged access to the Indian Lakes' amenities with the
often - desired reduced yard maintenance common with small lot, patio home -style subdivisions.
At the plat level, with only few exceptions, we are presenting a subdivision layout similar to many other
patio home projects located with the city limits of College Station. For instance, our proposed lots will
exceed the minimum lot square footage and dimensions for typical R -1 lots required within the city limits.
The proposed subdivision will not require any public utility services from the City of College Station.
Water service will be provided by Wellborn Special Utility District, electrical by Bryan Texas Utilities,
sanitary sewer by an onsite package wastewater treatment plant, and gas utilities by an independent
contractor.
We have met in previous months with members of Planning and Development Services regarding this
project and have received positive feedback on preliminary plans. We have also met with members of
the Brazos County Commissioner's Court and Brazos County Road & Bridge and have received similar
positive feedback on preliminary plans.
Acknowledgments
Smiling Mallard Development would like to acknowledge the following items with regard to the
development plans for Indian Lakes Phase IX.
Private Drive
The proposed subdivision will provide access to lots through the use of a 24' wide concrete, inverted -
crown private drive. Cul -de -sac portions of the driveways will be 20' wide concrete, inverted -crown
sections. Street drainage will follow along a path in the center of the street then to drainage structures
that will outfall into adjacent creeks and ultimately into neighboring Lake Arapaho. Water and sanitary
sewer utilities will be placed within the private drive right -of -way. Electrical, gas, and telephone will be
placed within the 10' public utility easements along the fronts of all lots. Refer to the submitted
Preliminary Plat for further information. The drawing below shows a typical street section.
PLATTED LOT 10' P.U.E. 28' RIGHT-OF -WAY + 10' P.U. PLATTED LOT
11.,x.
(OEP7RYAREB) I tf CONC. PVMT 1 j I MATH VARE�
r 1
I 1 1 1
1
1
0 0 I - DRAW eE I Q
o o o
TELEPOIE ELECTISCAL SANITARY WATER LINE
OAS
LNE U E SEWER LSE LSE LINE
TYPICAL PRIVATE DRIVE CROSS SECTION
Page 1 of 3
Attachment A
Package Wastewater Treatment Plant
An onsite package wastewater treatment plant will provide sanitary sewer utility services for the proposed
subdivision. This facility will be owned and maintained by the subdivisions Homeowner's Association.
The developer has submitted a wastewater treatment plant permit application to TCEQ. This application
is currently under review by TCEQ staff.
Fire Flow
The developer fully intends to provide waterlines capable of supporting the necessary water volumes to
meet fire flow requirements.
Gated Entry
The developer is planning to develop this project as a gated community. The entry gate feature will be
designed and installed according to the setbacks and other requirements provided within the UDO.
Emergency entry will be provided at the access control box.
Requested Variances
Smiling Mallard Development is requesting a Variance consideration for the following items:
Lot Width
According to the Subdivision Regulations, minimum lot widths in the ETJ are 100'. The developer is
requesting a variance for lot widths Tess than 100'. Since the proposed plan calls for a variety of different
lot widths, please refer to the Preliminary Plat for actual lot dimensions. At the private drive right -of -way,
the majority of the proposed lot widths range from 61' to 66'. Based on reasonable design standards, the
proposed lot width is adequate for the type of development planned.
Right -of -Way Width
Access to lots within this subdivision is planned by way of a 28' private drive right -of -way. Currently, the
minimum public road right -of -way is 70' in the ETJ. The developer is requesting a variance for a 28'
private drive right -of -way to provide access to the lots within this development. Since the proposed
access drive is planned as a 24' paved private street with centerline storm drainage, the proposed 28'
right -of -way will provide adequate space for the design and construction needs of the street system,
particularly for the type of development planned and the anticipated minimal amount of traffic volume
expected within this small gated community.
Front Lot Setback
Based on the Subdivision Regulations, the minimum front lot setback in the ETJ is 50'. In developments
similar to this one but along public streets (with much higher traffic volumes) within the city limits of
College Station the minimum setback is 25'. The developer is requesting a variance for a 20' front
setback. This development intends to create an environment that encourages front porch gatherings
between neighbors and a heightened degree of intimacy between home and streetscape. This reduced
front setback is in response to this type of development plan and the anticipated minimal amount of traffic
volumes within this small gated community. Each home will have a two -car garage and room for two cars
in front of each home. Additional visitors will be allowed to park on the streets and in various parking
areas to be constructed in the HOA Common Areas.
Page 2 of 3
Attachment A
Rear Lot Setback
According to the Subdivision Regulations, the minimum rear lot setback in the ETJ is 50'. In
developments similar to this one but within the city limits of College Station the rear setback is 20'. The
developer is requesting a variance for a 10' rear setback. This 10' setback will accommodate the
required 10' utility easement. Also, each lot backs up to an HOA conservation area. These conservation
areas vary in width, but the minimum width is 18'. With a 10' setback combined with the minimum
conservation area width, the minimum amount of rear separation between homes would be 38', just 2'
less than that which would occur in similar developments making use of common rear property lines
within the city limits of College Station.
Side Lot Setback
Based on the Subdivision Regulations, the minimum side lot setback in the ETJ is 20'. In developments
similar to this one but within the city limits of College Station the side setback is 7.5'. The developer is
requesting a variance for a 7.5' side setback. The proposed setback will meet fire code requirements.
The proposed setback is consistent with similar developments within the city limits of College Station.
Side Lot Utility Easement
Lots in the ETJ are required to provide a 10' utility easement along all side property lines. The developer
is requesting a variance for a 7.5' utility easement along the side lot lines of each lot to match up with the
requested 7.5' side setback. This reduced utility easement would be adequate taking into account its
feasibility for Tots in similar developments within the city limits of College Station.
Maximum Dwelling Units Per Acre & Lot Size
City /County Subdivision Regulations recommend a minimum 0.5 -acre lot within the ETJ. The developer
is requested a variance from this recommendation to allow lot acreages Tess than 0.5 acres. Since the
proposed plans call for a variety of different lot acreages, please refer to the Preliminary Plat for
requested lot acreages. Based on a comprehensive review of the development planned, the proposed lot
acreages are adequate.
Page 3 of 3
.):,
Z
0
(1)
111
CO
0 Z
0- 0
CL i=
i J
V
D 0
40 3
. r
Cl-
z 0
o z
*
< 0
,
, -1.
Z e8
w Z
Cf) 0
- .
. .
P., t
...
uJ —
CC (J)
.
CI 0
- '
.......
X CD
rt Z
0 - CE
0_ D
w 0
T (Y
mt- iri illatk, - 111" I".
a D
o U
z 0
.'S $
_..4.
00
P --I
, i0•4444. , , 4 f
. ,41,...
.,,
--,
**-s.
.....i CO
., .
0.1 W
. .
,..-...... _ .
CU 0
Al
•
N r 1
0 0 1 I
f A , I
c o Z
r p 't,
+at
w <
,
7
4
,....,,,,..,.... _ . . ....,...., ,e. .'
i I
I-- 0
- ••■• 41,
/
—
00
f = i 4, - , 4:
yliti \ .7. .,. '
---
'111 '''''''' i , 47„1.
_
/ low 1„halawp
° i I mei litlfill .
nze #.0.: ,, -
' , \ ,-,. - 71it y 1: -, -:‘, -
* I--i '
i fr a ,,,,,, ,.......„-, ., ,I ., ,-- .., ,
\
"4, I ....,.... — : . , ,•,.,
1,
ill
(.\\
... ,
,
..,
1-' I ifil 4,
.,.4
)
s '\
Z CI) anommiwi
0
--y
*,
;616i l""
LLI
...JI Atighow, s '
w
r ' ;
, -
,
4 's-
r/
' s
... a
'% A eimii01.1.1
.—:' 4iii;t:
• _
111111 <
a ' ' ' i i : - - F *".: , ' ■ ■'...."..
, ..1: -. ,
CL
■ ' - „ ' 4' . 4+ ,,, ' . , A '''. ' tb, - ' ' .1 it.''
r ..r*.t.
....
4 4
1
) 011,11 LLI
Z
0
F emill o
INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES
Water required for plat: This phase is not considered to be vested and
therefore must meet all fire flow requirements in accordance with the
Bryan /College Station Design Guidelines and Specifications. The domestic
water is proposed to be served off the same line as fire flow and is to be served
by Wellborn SUD.
Water Service: Required to provide domestic service to each platted lot.
Sewer required for plat: The developer is proposing an onsite sewer
treatment plant specifically for this phase to be operated by Wellborn SUD.
The plant will require TCEQ permits for the plant and the operator prior to the
Final Plat. Indian Lakes has not yet submitted any TCEQ permits with this
preliminary plat.
Sewer Service: Required to provide domestic service to each platted lot.
Street(s) required for plat: The streets are proposed to be privately
maintained by the HOA, 24 -feet in width, inverted crown for centerline drainage
with no curb and gutters.
Streets /Access: The street access is to Indian Lakes Drive.
Off -site Easements required for plat: N/A
Drainage: Designed to Brazos County Standards.
Flood Plain: N/A
Oversize request: N/A
Impact Fees: N/A
Parkland Dedication Fees: N/A