HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-3060 - Ordinance - 03/27/2008ORDINANCE NO. 3060
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 15, "IMPACT FEES", OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, BY AMENDING
CERTAIN SECTIONS AS SET OUT BELOW; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
DECLARING A PENALTY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION,
TEXAS:
PART 1:
That Chapter 15, "IMPACT FEES", of the Code of Ordinances of the City of
College Station, Texas, be amended as set out in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and
made a part of this ordinance for all purposes.
PART 2: That if any provisions of any section of this ordinance shall be held to be void or
unconstitutional, such holding shall in no way effect the validity of the remaining
provisions or sections of this ordinance, which shall remain in full force and
effect.
PART 3: That any person, firm, or corporation violating any of the provisions of this
chapter shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof
shall be punishable by a fine of not less than Twenty-five Dollars ($25.00) nor
more than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00). Each day such violation shall
continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. Said
Ordinance, being a penal ordinance, becomes effective ten (10) days after its date
of passage by the City Council, as provided by Section 35 of the Charter of the
City of College Station.
PASSED, ADOPTED and APPROVED this 27th day of March , 2008.
APPROVED:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
L�..� '-• • r"
ity Secretary
APPROVED:
gi5geil
City Attorney
EXHIBIT "A"
That Chapter 15, "IMPACT FEES", of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station,
Texas, is hereby amended, by deleting Chapter 15 in its entirety and replacing with Chapter 15
as set out hereafter to read as follows:
CHAPTER 15
IMPACT FEES
SECTION I: GENERAL PROVISIONS
A. SHORT TITLE
This Chapter shall be known and cited as the College Station Impact Fees Chapter.
B. PURPOSE
This Chapter is intended to assure the provision of adequate public facilities to serve
new development in the City by requiring each development to pay its pro rata share
of the costs of such improvements necessitated by and attributable to such new
development.
C. AUTHORITY
This Chapter is adopted pursuant to Texas Local Government Code Chapter 395,
(S.B. 336) and pursuant to the College Station City Charter. The provisions of this
Chapter shall not be construed to limit the power of the City to utilize other methods
authorized under State law or pursuant to other City powers to accomplish the
purposes set forth herein, either in substitution or in conjunction with this Chapter.
Guidelines may be developed by resolution or otherwise to implement and administer
this chapter.
D. DEFINITIONS
(1) Advisory Committee means the City's Planning and Zoning Commission, as
duly appointed by Resolution 6-11-92-1.10.
(2) Area -related facility means a capital improvement or facility expansion which is
designated in the Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan and which is not a
(3)
site -related facility. Area -related facility may include a capital improvement
which is located off-site, within, or on the perimeter of the development site.
Assessment means the determination of the amount of the maximum impact
fee per service unit which can be imposed on new development pursuant to
this Chapter.
(4) Capital improvement means either a roadway facility, a water facility, a sanitary
sewer facility or a drainage facility, with a life expectancy of three (3) or more
years, to be owned and operated by or on behalf of the City.
(5) City means the City of College Station, Texas.
(6) Credit means the amount of the reduction of an impact fee for fees, payments
or charges for the same type of capital improvements for which the fee has
been assessed.
(7) Facilities expansion means either a roadway expansion, a water facility
expansion or a sanitary sewer facility expansion.
(8)
(9)
Final plat approval or approval of a final plat means the point at which the
applicant has complied with all conditions of approval, and the plat has been
released for filing with Brazos County.
Impact fee means either a fee for roadway facilities, a fee for water facilities, or
a fee for sanitary sewer facilities imposed on new development by the City
pursuant to this Chapter in order to fund or recoup the costs of capital
improvements or facilities expansions necessitated by and attributable to such
new development. Impact fees do not include the dedication of rights-of-way
or easements for such facilities, or the construction of such improvements.
Impact fees also do not include pro rata charges or acreage charges for
sanitary sewer improvements or front footage charges for sanitary sewer and
water lines imposed pursuant to Section 3 of the Utility Chapter; or funds
deposited in escrow for the construction of roadway improvements imposed
pursuant to the Subdivision Chapter.
(10) Impact fee capital improvements plan means either a roadway improvements
plan, a water improvements plan or a sanitary sewer improvements plan
adopted or revised pursuant to this Chapter. Impact fee capital improvements
plan may refer to either the plan for a particular service area or to the
aggregation of capital improvements or facilities expansions and the
associated costs programmed for all service areas for a particular category of
capital improvements or facilities expansions.
(11) Land use assumptions means the projections of population and employment
growth and associated changes in land uses, densities and intensities adopted
by the City, as may be amended from time to time, upon which the impact fee
capital improvements plans are based.-
(12)
ased.
(12) New development means a project involving the construction, reconstruction,
redevelopment, conversion, structural alteration, relocation, or enlargement of
any structure, or any use or extension of land, which has the effect of
increasing the requirements for capital improvements or facility expansions,
measured by the number of service units to be generated by such activity, and
which requires either the approval and filing with Brazos County of a plat
pursuant to the City's subdivision regulations, the issuance of a building permit,
or connection to the City's water or sanitary sewer system.
(13) Offset means the amount of the reduction of an impact fee designed to fairly
reflect the value of area -related facilities or other roadway facilities pursuant to
rules herein established or administrative guidelines, provided by a developer
pursuant to the City's subdivision regulations or requirements.
(14) Recoupment means the imposition of an impact fee to reimburse the City for
capital improvements which the City has previously oversized to serve new
development.
(15) Roadway means any thoroughfare, major or minor arterials or collectors
designated in the City's adopted Thoroughfare Plan, as may be amended from
time to time. Roadway does not include any roadway designated as a
numbered highway on the official federal or Texas highway system.
(16) Roadway expansion means the expansion of the capacity or redesign of an
existing roadway in the City, but does not include the repair, maintenance,
modernization, or expansion of an existing roadway to better serve existing
development.
(17) Roadway facility means an improvement or appurtenance to a roadway which
includes, but is not limited to, design, rights-of-way, whether conveyed by deed
or easement; intersection improvements; traffic control devices; turn lanes;
drainage facilities associated with the roadway; street lighting or curbs.
Roadway facility also includes any improvement or appurtenance to an
intersection with a roadway officially enumerated in the federal or Texas
highway system. Roadway facility excludes those improvements or
appurtenances to a roadway which are site -related facilities.
(18) Roadway improvements plan means the adopted plan, as may be amended
from time to time, which identifies the roadway facilities or roadway expansions
and their costs for each roadway benefit area, which are necessitated by and
which are attributable to new development, for a period not to exceed ten (10)
years, which are to be financed in whole or in part through the imposition of
roadway facilities fees pursuant to this Chapter.
(19) Service area means either a roadway benefit area, a water benefit area, or
sanitary sewer benefit area within the City, within which impact fees for capital
improvements or facilities expansions will be collected for new development
occurring within such area and within which fees so collected will be expended
for those types of improvements or expansions identified in the type of capital
improvements plan applicable to the service area.
(20) Service unit means the applicable standard units of measure shown on the
conversion table in the Impact Fees Capital Improvements Plan which can be
converted to living unit equivalents (L.U.E.) as set out in Exhibit B in the Capital
Improvements Plan, as the context indicates, which serves as the standardized
measure of consumption, use or generation attributable to the new unit of
development.
(21) Sanitary sewer facility means an improvement for providing sanitary sewer
service, including, but not limited to, land or easements, treatment facilities, lift
stations, or interceptor mains. Sanitary sewer facility excludes sanitary sewer
lines or mains which are constructed by developers, the costs of which are
reimbursed from pro rata charges paid by subsequent users of the facilities.
Sanitary sewer facilities exclude site -related facilities.
(22) Sanitary sewer facility expansion means the expansion of the capacity of any
existing sanitary sewer improvement for the purpose of serving new
development, but does not include the repair, maintenance, modernization, or
expansion of an existing sanitary sewer facility to serve existing development.
(23) Sanitary sewer improvements plan means the adopted plan, as may be
amended from time to time, which identifies the sanitary sewer facilities or
sanitary sewer expansions and their associated costs which are necessitated
by and which are attributable to new development for a period not to exceed
ten (10) years, and which are to be financed in whole or in part through the
imposition of sanitary sewer facilities fees pursuant to this Chapter.
(24) Single-family residential lot means a lot platted to accommodate a single-family
dwelling unit, as authorized under the City's zoning regulations.
(25) Site -related facility means an improvement or facility which is for the primary
use or benefit of a new development and/or which is for the primary purpose of
safe and adequate provision of roadway, water or sanitary sewer facilities to
serve the new development, and which is not included in the impact fees
capital improvements plan and for which the developer or property owner is
solely responsible under subdivision and other applicable regulations.
(26) Water facility means an improvement for providing water service, including, but
not limited to, land or easements, water treatment facilities, water supply
facilities, water transmission or distribution lines. Water facility excludes water
lines or mains which are reimbursed from pro rata charges paid by subsequent
users of the facilities. Water facility excludes site -related facilities.
(27) Water facility expansion means the expansion of the capacity of any existing
water facility for the purpose of serving new development, but does not include
the repair, maintenance, modernization, or expansion of an existing water
facility to serve existing development.
(28) Water improvement plan means the adopted plan, as may be amended from
time to time, which identifies the water facilities or water expansions and their
associated costs which are necessitated by and which are attributable to new
development, for a period not to exceed ten (10) years, and which are to be
financed in whole or in part through the imposition of water facilities fees
pursuant to this Chapter.
E. APPLICABILITY
The provisions of this Chapter apply to all new development, as defined herein, within
the corporate boundaries of the City. The provisions of this Chapter apply uniformly
within each service area.
F. IMPACT FEE AS CONDITION OF DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
No application for new development shall be approved within the City without
assessment of an impact fee pursuant to this Chapter, and no permit shall be issued
unless the applicant has paid the impact fee imposed by and calculated herein.
G. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS
(1) Land use assumptions for the City are attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and is
incorporated herein by reference.
(2) The land use assumptions for the City shall be updated at least every three (3)
years, utilizing the amendment procedure set forth in Subsection Q.
(3)
Amendments to the land use assumptions shall incorporate projections of
changes in land uses, densities, intensities and population therein over at least
a ten (10) year period.
H. IMPACT FEES PER SERVICE UNIT
(1) The maximum impact fee per service unit for each service area shall be
computed by dividing the total costs of capital improvements necessitated by
and attributable to new development in the service area identified in the impact
fee capital improvements plan for that category of capital improvements by the
total number of service units anticipated within the service area, based upon
the land use assumptions for that service area. Maximum impact fees per
service unit for each service area shall be established by category of capital
improvements and shall be as set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made
a part of this Chapter by reference.
(2) The impact fee per service unit which is to be paid by each new development
within a service area shall be that established by Ordinance by the City
Council, as may be amended from time to time, and shall be an amount less
than or equal to the maximum impact fee per service unit established in
paragraph (1) above. Impact fees which are to be paid shall be as set forth in
Exhibit D, attached hereto and made a part of this Chapter by reference.
(3)
Impact fee Exhibits C and D may be amended from time to time utilizing the
amendment procedure set forth in Subsection Q.
I. ASSESSMENT OF IMPACT FEES
(1) The approval of any new development shall include as a condition the
assessment of the impact fee applicable to such development.
(2) Assessment of the impact fee for any new development shall be made as
follows:
(Ordinance No. 1972 of August 27,1992)
(3)
(a) A development which is submitted for approval pursuant to the City's
subdivision regulations following the effective date of this Chapter,
assessment shall be at the time of final plat approval for R-1 Single
Family Residential, R -1A Single Family Residential, R-2 Duplex
Residential, R-3 Townhouse-Rowhouse, R-4 Apartment/Low Density, R-
5 Apartment Medium Density, R-6 Apartment High Density, and R-7
Mobile Home Park and assessment for all other Zoning Districts shall
be at the time of issuance of the building permit, and shall be the
amount of the maximum impact fee per service unit then in effect, as set
forth in Exhibit C, as computed by the procedures set forth in
Subsection H(1). The City, in its sole discretion, may provide the
subdivider with a copy of Exhibit C prior to final plat approval, but such
shall not constitute assessment within the meaning of this Chapter.
(Ordinance No. 22" of May 21,1997)
(b) For a development which has received final plat approval prior to the
effective date of this Chapter and for which no replatting is necessary
prior to issuance for a permit, assessment shall be on the effective date
of this ordinance, and shall be the amount of the maximum impact fee
per service unit set forth in Exhibit C.
(c) For land on which new development is approved to occur without
platting after the effective date of this Chapter, assessment shall be at
the time of issuance of a permit for connection to the water or sewer
system.
Following assessment of the impact fee pursuant to paragraph (2)(b) above,
the amount of the impact fee per service unit for that development cannot be
increased, unless the owner proposes to change the approved development by
the submission of a new application for final plat approval, in which case new
assessment shall occur at the Exhibit C rate then in effect.
(4) Following the lapse or expiration of approval for a plat, a new assessment must
be performed at the time a new application for such development is filed.
(5) An application for an amending plat made pursuant to V.T..C.S., Local
Government Code, Section 212.016 is not subject to reassessment for an
impact fee.
(Ordinance No. 1972 of August 27,1992)
J. COMPUTATION AND COLLECTION OF IMPACT FEES
(1) The impact fees due for the new development shall be collected prior to or at
the time of final plat recordation for roadway facilities, water and sanitary sewer
facilities unless an agreement between the developer and the City has been
executed providing for a different time of payment.
(Ordinance No. 2213 of October 10. 1996)
(2) The impact fees due for land on which new development occurs or is proposed
to occur without platting, impact fees shall be collected at the time of issuance
of a permit for connection to the water or sewer system.
(3)
Following the filing and acceptance of an application for a building permit or the
request for connection to the City's water or sanitary sewer system, the City
shall compute the impact fees due for the new development in the following
manner.
(a) The amount of each impact fee due shall be determined by multiplying
the number of service units generated by the new development by the
impact fee due per service unit for the service area using Exhibit D. The
number of service units shall be determined by using the conversion
table contained in the impact fee capital improvements plan.
(b) The amount of each impact fee due shall be reduced by an allowable
offsets or credits for that category of capital improvements, in the
manner provided in Subsection L.
(c) The total amount of the impact fees due for the new development shall
be calculated and attached to the development application or request
for connection as a condition of approval.
(4) The amount of each impact fee due for a new development shall not exceed an
amount computed by multiplying the fee assessed per service unit pursuant to
Subsection H by the number of service units generated by the development.
(5)
If the building permit for which an impact fee has been paid has expired, and a
new application is thereafter filed, the impact fees due shall be computed using
Exhibit D then in effect, with credits for previous payment of fees being applied
against the new fees due.
(6) Whenever the property owner proposes to increase the number of service units
for a development, the additional impact fees collected for such new service
units shall be determined by using Exhibit D then in effect and such additional
fee shall be collected either prior to or at the time of issuance of a new building
permit, in the case of impact fees for roadway facilities, or prior to or at the time
of enlargement of the connection to the City's water or sanitary sewer system,
in the case of impact fees for water or sanitary sewer facilities.
(7)
In its sole discretion, the City may permit the developer nr property owner,
upon written application, to pay impact fees for all or a portion of a single-family
residential lots at the time of final plat recording for such development, in the
amounts provided in paragraph (2) of this Subsection.
K. SUSPENSION OF FEE COLLECTION
(1) For any new development which has received final plat approval prior to
August 27, 1992, in accordance with Texas Local Government Code, Chapter
212, or pursuant to the City's subdivision regulations, the City may assess, but
shall not collect any impact fee as herein defined, on any service unit for which
a valid building permit is issued within one (1) year subsequent to the effective
date of this Chapter.
(2) If the building permit, which is obtained within the period provided for in
paragraph (1) above, subsequently expires, and no new application is made
and approved within such period, the new development shall be subject to the
payment of an impact fee, as provided in Subsection J.
(3)
During such one (1) year period, the City may impose and collect on such new
development pro rata fees including lot or acreage fees for sanitary sewer
improvements pursuant or front footage charges for sanitary sewer and water
lines which have been previously installed by the City pursuant to Section 3 of
Chapter 11 of the Code of Ordinances, as amended, and may accept deposits
in escrow for roadway facilities pursuant to the City's subdivision regulations.
After the expiration of such period, collection of all such fees, charges or
deposits in escrow, unless elsewhere expressly authorized, shall be
suspended and fees shall be collected for such new developments pursuant to
the provisions of this Chapter.
L. OFFSETS AND CREDITS AGAINST IMPACT FEES
(1) The City shall offset the reasonable value of any area -related facilities or other
roadway facilities, pursuant to rules established in this section or pursuant to
guidelines and which have been dedicated to and have been received after
initial acceptance by the City on or after August 27, 1992, including the value of
rights-of-way for roadways, or capital improvements constructed pursuant to an
agreement with the City, against the amount of the impact fee due for that
category of capital improvement.
(2) The City shall credit pro rata charges, including lot or acreage fees or charges,
which have been paid pursuant to Section 3 of Chapter 11 of the Code of
Ordinances, as amended, and eligible escrow fees deposited for roadway
facilities prior to the effective date of this Chapter, and during the one (1) year
period following adoption of this ordinance, during which impact fees
established herein may not be collected for certain new developments pursuant
to Subsection K, against the amount of an impact fee due for that category of
capital improvement, subject to guidelines established for the City.
(3)
All offsets and credits against impact fees shall be subject to the following
limitations and shall be granted based on this Ordinance and additional
standards promulgated by the City, which may be adopted as administrative
guidelines.
(a) No offset or credit shall be given for the dedication or construction of
siterelated facilities.
(b) No offset or credit shall exceed an amount equal to the eligible value of
the offset multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the impact
fee per service unit due for the new development as computed using
Exhibit D and the denominator of which is the maximum impact fee per
service unit for the new development as computed using Exhibit C.
(c) The unit costs used to calculate the offsets shall not exceed those
assumed for the capital improvements included in the impact fees
capital improvements plan for the category of facility within the service
area for which the impact fee is imposed.
(d) No offsets shall be given for roadway facilities which are not identified
within the applicable impact fees capital improvements plan, except that
offsets may be given for the value of dedicated rights-of-way or the
value of constructed capital 'improvements for roadways designated in
the City's Thoroughfare Plan built to City standards and initially
accepted by the City. Offsets may only be given for dedications or
construction made and initially accepted after January 1, 1984.
(e) No credit shall be given for roadway facilities which are not identified
within the applicable impact fees capital improvements plan, except that
credit may be given for money deposits (other than impact fees) paid to
the City toward the costs of rights-of-way or the costs of construction
capital improvements for eligible roadways designated in the City's
Thoroughfare Development Plan built to City standards and initially
accepted by the City. Credit may only be given for rights-of-way
acquired or construction completed and initially accepted by the City.
Credit may only be given for rights-of-way acquired or construction
completed and initially accepted after January 1, 1984.
(f)
(g)
Offsets or credits given for new developments which have received final
plat approval prior to the effective date of this Chapter, or offsets or
credits acquired for new developments during the one (1) year period
specified in Subsection K, shall be reduced by subtracting an amount
equal to the impact fees which would have been due for the number of
existing service units using Exhibit D adopted hereby.
If an offset or credit applicable to a plat has not been exhausted within
ten (10) years from the date of the acquisition of the first building permit
issued or connection made after the effective date of this ordinance or
within such period as may be otherwise designated by contract, such
offset or credit shall lapse.
(h) In no event will the City reimburse the property owner or developer for
an offset or credit when no impact fees for the new development can be
collected pursuant to this Chapter or for any amount exceeding the total
impact fees due for the development for that category of capital
improvement, unless otherwise agreed to by the City.
(4) An applicant for new development must apply for an offset or credit against
impact fees due for the development either at the time of application for final
plat approval or (1) for roadway fees, at the time of building permit application,
and (2) for water and sewer fees, at the time of connection, unless the City
agrees to a different time. The applicant shall file a petition for offsets or credits
with the City on a fort provided for such purpose. The contents of the petition
shall be established by administrative guidelines. The City must provide the
applicant, in writing, with a decision on the offset or credit request, including
the reasons for the decision. The decision shall specify the maximum value of
the offset or credit which may be applied against an impact fee, which amount
and the date of the determination shall be associated with the plat for the new
development.
(5) The available offset or credit associated with the plat shall be. applied against
an impact fee in the following manner.
(a) For single-family residential lots in a new development consisting only
of single-family residential lots which have received final plat approval,
such offset or credit shall be prorated equally among such lots and shall
remain applicable to such lots, to be applied at the time of filing and
acceptance of an application for a building permit or connection, as
appropriate against impact fees due.
(b) For all other types of new development, including those involving mixed
uses, which have received final plat approval, the offset or credit
applicable to the plat shall be applied to the impact fee due at the time
of issuance of the first building permit or connection to which the offset
or credit is applicable, and thereafter to all subsequently issued building
permits or connections, until the offset or credit has been exhausted.
(c) At its sole discretion, the City may authorize alternative credit or offset
agreements upon petition by the owner in accordance with guidelines
promulgated by the City.
M. ESTABLISHMENT OF ACCOUNTS
(1) The City's Finance Department shall establish an account to which interest is
allocated for each service area for each category of capital facility for which an
impact fee is imposed pursuant to this Chapter. Each impact fee collected
within the service area shall be deposited in such account.
(2) Interest earned on the account into which the impact fees are deposited shall
be considered funds of the account and shall be used solely for the purposes
authorized in Subsection N.
(3)
The City's Finance Department shall establish adequate financial and
accounting controls to ensure that impact fees disbursed from the account are
utilized solely for the purposes authorized in Subsection N. Disbursement of
funds shall be authorized by the City at such times as are reasonably
necessary to cant' out the purposes and intent of this Chapter, provided,
however, that any fee paid shall be expended within a reasonable period of
time, but not to exceed ten (10) years from the date the fee is deposited into
the account.
(4) The City's Finance Department shall maintain and keep financial records for
impact fees, which shall show the source and disbursement of all fees
collected in or expended from each service area. The records of the account
into which impact fees are deposited shall be open for public inspection and
copying during ordinary business hours. The City may establish a fee for
copying services.
(5)
The Finance Department shall maintain and keep adequate financial records
for said account which shall show the source and disbursement of all funds
placed in or expended by such account.
N. USE OF PROCEEDS OF IMPACT FEE ACCOUNTS
(1) The impact fees collected for each service area pursuant to this Chapter may
be used to finance or to recoup the costs of any capital improvements or
facilities expansions identified in the applicable impact fee capital
improvements plan for the service area, including the construction contract
price, surveying and engineering fees, land acquisition costs (including land
purchases, court awards and costs, attorney's fees, and expert witness fees),
and the fees actually paid or contracted to be paid to an independent qualified
engineer or financial consultant preparing or updating the impact fee capital
improvements plan who is not an employee of the political subdivision. Impact
fees may also be used to pay the principal sum and interest and other finance
costs on bonds, notes or other obligations issued by or on behalf of the City to
finance such capital improvements or facilities expansions.
(2) Impact fees collected pursuant to this Chapter shall not be used to pay for any
of the following expenses:
(a) construction, acquisition or expansion of capital improvements or assets
other than those identified in the applicable impact fee capital improve-
ments plan;
(b) repair, operation, or maintenance of existing or new capital
improvements or facilities expansions;
(c) upgrading, expanding or replacing existing capital improvements to
serve existing development in order to meet stricter safety, efficiency,
environmental or regulatory standards;
(d) upgrading, expanding or replacing existing capital improvements to
provide better service to existing development; provided, however, that
impact fees may be used to pay the costs of upgrading, expanding or
replacing existing capital improvements in order to meet the need for
new capital improvements generated by new development;
(e) administrative and operating costs of the City; or
(f) roadway facilities or roadway expansions in the extraterritorial
jurisdiction of the City.
(g)
0. APPEALS
In the event that a capital improvement or facility expansion involves
more than one (1) service area for a particular category of capital
improvement, funds from each service area involved may be pooled to
finance the project; provided, however, that in the event the funds
expended from any service area exceed the proportionate share of the
costs of the facilities attributable to the development in such service
area, such account shall be credited in the amount exceeding such
share, to be repaid from impact fee proceeds collected in other
contributing service areas.
(1) The property owner or applicant for new development may appeal the following
decisions to the City Council: (1) applicability of an impact fee to the
development; (2) the amount of the impact fee due; (3) the availability or the
amount of an offset or credit; (4) the application of an offset or credit against
any impact fee due; (5) the amount of a refund due, if any.
(2) The burden of proof shall be on the appellant to demonstrate that the amount
of the fee or the amount of the offset or credit was not calculated according to
the applicable schedule of impact fees or the guidelines established for
determining offsets and credits.
(3)
The appellant must file a notice of appeal with the City Secretary within thirty
(30) days following the decision. If the notice of appeal is accompanied by a
bond or other sufficient surety satisfactory to the City Attorney in an amount
equal to the original determination of the impact fee due, the development
application may be processed while the appeal is pending.
P. REFUNDS
(1) Any impact fee or portion thereof collected pursuant to this Chapter, which has
not been expended within the service area within ten (10) years from the date
of payment, shall be refunded, upon application, to the record owner of the
property at the time the refund is paid or, if the impact fee was paid by another
governmental entity, to such governmental entity, together with interest
calculated from the date of collection to the date of refund at the statutory rate
as set forth in Article 1.03, Title 79, Revised Statutes (Article 5069-1.03,
Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes), or any successor statute.
(2) An impact fee collected pursuant to this Chapter shall be considered expended
if the total expenditures for capital improvements or facilities expansions
authorized in Subsection N within the service area within ten (10) years
following the date of payment exceeds the total fees collected for such
improvements or expansions during such period.
(3)
If a refund is due pursuant to paragraphs (1) and (2) above, the City shall pro-
rate the same by dividing the difference between the amount of expenditures
and the amount of the fees collected by the total number of service units
assumed within the service area for the period to determine the refund due per
service unit. The refund to the record owner shall be calculated by multiplying
the refund due per service unit by the number of service units for the
development for which the fee was paid, and interest due shall be calculated
upon that amount.
(4) Upon completion of all the capital improvements or facilities expansions
identified in the impact fee capital improvements plan for the service area, the
City shall recalculate the maximum impact fee per service unit using the actual
costs for the improvements or expansions. If the maximum impact fee per
(5)
service unit based on actual cost is less than the impact fee per service unit
paid, the City shall refund the difference, if. such difference exceeds. the
impact fee . paid by more than ten percent (1096). The refund to the record
owner shall be calculated by multiplying such difference by the number of
service units for the development for which the fee was paid, and interest due
shall be calculated upon that amount.
If the building permit for a new development for which an impact fee has been
paid has expired, and a modified or new application has not been filed within
six (6) months of such expiration, the City shall, upon written application,
refund the amount of the impact fee to the applicant. The City may establish
guidelines for refunding of impact fees collected for which construction plans
have been abandoned.
Q. UPDATES TO PLAN AND REVISION OF FEES
(1) The City shall update its land use assumptions and impact fees capital
improvements plans and shall recalculate its impact fees not Tess than once
every three years in accordance with the procedures set forth in Texas Local
Government Code Section 395.052, or in any successor statute.
(2) The City may review its land use assumptions, impact fee capital
improvements plans, and other factors such as market conditions more
frequently than provided in paragraph (1) above to determine whether the land
use assumptions and impact fee capital improvements plans should be
updated and the impact fee recalculated accordingly, or whether Exhibit D
collection rates should be increased, decreased, or otherwise changed.
R. FUNCTIONS OF ADVISORY COMMITTEE
(1) The Advisory Committee shall perform the following functions:
(a) advise arid assist the City in adopting land use assumptions;
(b) review the impact fee capital improvements plans and file written
comments thereon;
(c) monitor and evaluate implementation of the impact fee capital improve-
ments plans;
(d) advise the City of the need to update or revise the land use
assumptions, impact fee capital improvements plans and impact fees;
and file a semiannual report evaluating the progress of the City in
achieving the impact fee capital improvements plans and identifying any
problems in implementing the plans or administering the impact fees.
(2) The City Council shall adopt, by resolution, procedural rules by which the
Advisory Committee may carry out its duties.
(3) The City shall make available to the Advisory Committee any professional
reports prepared in the development or implementation of the impact fee
capital improvements plans.
S. AGREEMENT FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
(1) An owner of a new development may construct or finance a capital
improvement or facility expansion designated in the impact fee capital
improvements plan, if required or authorized by the City, by entering into an
agreement with the City prior to the issuance of any building permit for the
development. The agreement shall be on a form approved by the City, and
shall identify the estimated cost of the improvement or expansion, the schedule
for initiation and completion of the improvement or expansion, a requirement
that the improvement be designed and completed to City standards and such
other terms and conditions as deemed necessary by the City. The agreement
shall provide for the method to be used to determine the amount of the offset to
be given against impact fees due for the development.
(2) In the event that the City elects to reimburse an owner for the dedication, con-
struction or financing of a capital improvement or facility expansion designated
in the impact fee capital improvements plan, the terms of reimbursement shall
be incorporated in the agreement required by paragraph (1) above.
T. USE OF OTHER FINANCING MECHANISMS
(1) The City may finance capital improvements or facilities expansions designated
in the impact fee capital improvements plan through the issuance of bonds,
through the formation of public improvement districts or other assessment
districts, or through any other authorized mechanism, in such manner and
subject to such limitations as may be provided by law, in addition to the use of
impact fees.
(2) Except as herein otherwise provided, the assessment and collection of an
impact fee shall be additional and supplemental to, and not in substitution of,
any other tax, fee, charge or assessment which is lawfully imposed on and due
against the property.
(3) The City may pay all or part of impact fees due for a new development taking
into account available offsets and credits pursuant to duly adopted criteria.
U. IMPACT FEE AS ADDITIONAL AND SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATION
Impact fees established by this Chapter are additional and supplemental to, and not in
substitution of, any other requirements imposed by the City on the development of
land or the issuance of building permits or certificates of occupancy. Such fee is
intended to be consistent with and to further the policies of City's Comprehensive
Plan, the impact fee capital improvements plan, the zoning ordinance, subdivision
regulations and other City policies, ordinances and resolutions by which the City seeks
to ensure the provision of adequate public facilities in conjunction with the
development of land.
V. RELIEF PROCEDURES
(1) Any person who has paid an impact fee or an owner of land upon which an
impact fee has been paid may petition the City Council to determine whether
any duty required by this ordinance has not been performed within the time so
prescribed. The petition shall be in writing and shall state the nature of the
unperformed duty and request that the act be performed within sixty (60) days
of the request. If the City Council determines that the duty is required pursuant
to the ordinance and is late in being performed, it shall cause the duty to
commence with sixty (60) days of the date of the request and to continue until
completion.
(2) The City Council may grant a variance or waiver from any requirement of this
ordinance, upon written request by a developer or owner of property subject to
the ordinance, following a public hearing, and only upon finding that a strict
application of such requirement would when regarded as a whole result in
confiscation of the property.
(3) The City Council may grant a waiver from any requirement of this ordinance on
other grounds, as may be set forth in administrative guidelines.
(4) If the City Council grants a variance or waiver to the amount of the impact fee
due for a new development under this Section, it shall cause to be appropriated
from other City funds the amount of the reduction in the impact fee to the
account for the service area in which the property is located.
W. EXEMPTION FROM ORDINANCE
Any building permit application which was duly accepted for filing prior to the effective
date of this Chapter and which is subsequently granted, shall be exempt from the
assessment and payment of an impact fee, unless such application thereafter expires.
SECTION II: ROADWAY FACILITIES FEES (Reserved)
(Ordinance No. 1972 of August 27, 1992)
SECTION III: WATER FACILITIES FEES
A. WATER SERVICE AREA
(1) There is hereby established a water benefit area, constituting the Service Area
as depicted on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference.
(2) The boundaries of the water benefit area may be amended from time to time
and new water benefit areas may be delineated, pursuant to the procedures in
Section I, Subsection Q.
B. WATER IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
(1) The Water Improvements Plan for the Service Area is hereby adopted as
Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
(2) The Water Improvements Plan may be amended from time to time, pursuant to
the procedures In Section I, Subsection Q.
C. WATER FACILITIES FEES
(1) The maximum impact fees per service unit for water facilities are hereby
adopted and incorporated in Exhibit C attached hereto and made a part hereof
by reference.
(2) The impact fees per service unit for water facilities, which are to be paid by
each new development, are hereby adopted and incorporated in Exhibit D
attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference.
(3) The impact fees per service unit for water facilities may be amended from time
to time, pursuant to the procedures in Section 1, Subsection Q.
(Ordinance No. 2385 of April 22, 1999)
SECTION IV: SEWER FACILITIES FEES
A. SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AREA
(1) There is hereby established a sanitary sewer benefit area, constituting the
Service Area as depicted on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein
by reference.
(2) The boundaries of the sanitary sewer benefit area may be amended from time
to time, and new sanitary sewer benefit areas may be delineated, pursuant to
the procedures in Section I, Subsection Q.
B. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
(1) The Sanitary Sewer Improvements Plan for the Service Area is hereby adopted
as Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
(2) The Sanitary Sewer Improvements Plan may be amended from time to time,
pursuant to the procedures in Section I, Subsection Q.
C. SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES FEES
(1) The maximum impact fees per service unit for sanitary sewer facilities are
hereby adopted and incorporated in Exhibit C attached hereto and made a part
hereof by reference.
(2) The impact fees per service unit for sanitary sewer facilities, which are to be
paid by each new development, are hereby adopted and incorporated in Exhibit
D attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference.
(3) The impact fees per service unit for sewer facilities may be amended from time
to time, pursuant to the procedures in Section I, Subsection Q.
SECTION V: DRAINAGE FACILITIES FEES (Reserved)
(Ordinance No. 1972 of August 27, 1992)
NOTE:
SEE: Resolution No. 12-11-97-6-b approved by Council on December 12, 1997, adopting land
use assumptions, capital improvements, and sanitary sewer impact fees for Service Area 97-
01 (Pebble Hills/Greens Prairie Road area), page 15-41.
SEE: Resolution No. 12-11-97-6-c approved by Council on December 12, 1997, adopting
land use assumption, capital improvements and sanitary sewer impact fees for Service Area
97-02 (Lick Creek/Nantucket area), page 15-60.
SEE: Resolution No. 7-22-99-3.3 approved by Council on April 22, 1999, adopting land use
assumption, capital improvements and sanitary sewer impact fees for Service Area 99-01
(along northeastern right-of-way of S.H. 6), page 15- .
EXHIBIT A: LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS
Table 2-1A (Graham Road Extension)
POPULATION AND LAND USE PROJECTIONS FOR AREA 92-01
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
LAND USE
2005
2015
Full Buildout
ACRES
Oh
ACRES
ACRES
OA
Floodplain & Streams 9.6
Industrial R & D 38.6
Institutional 48.6
Office 0.0
Park 37.8
Residential Attached 42.8
Retail Neighborhood 0.0
Retail Regional 31.5
Rural 35.8
Single Family Residential High Density 0.0
Single Family Residential Low Density 57.0
Single Family Residential Medium Density 117.5
Transitional 0.0
Subtotal Land Uses (a) 419.2
TOTAL GROSS ACRES 505.0 100.00%
1.90%
7.64%
9.62%
0.00%
7.49%
8.48%
0.00%
6.24%
7.09%
0.00%
11.29%
23.27%
0.00%
83.01%
Population 3,046
Population per Urban Acres
Population per Total Acres
7.27
6.03
9.6
41.7
48.6
1.3
37.8
42.8
0.0
31.5
27.0
0.0
82.7
117.5
0.0
440.4
505.0
1.90%
8.25%
9.62%
0.26%
7.49%
8.48%
0.00%
6.24%
5.34%
0.00%
16.37%
23.27%
0.00%
87.21%
100.00%
9.6
51.0
48.6
5.3
37.8
42.8
0.0
31.5
0.0
0.0
160.9
117.5
0.0
505.0
505.0
3,406 4,502
7.73 8.92
6.74 8.92
1.90%
10.10%
9.62%
1.05%
7.49%
8.48%
0.00%
6.24%
0.00%
0.00%
31.86%
23.27%
0.00%
100.00%
100.00%
Table 2-1 B (Spring Creek Sewer)
POPULATION AND LAND USE PROJECTIONS FOR AREA 97-01
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
LAND USE
2005
2015
Full Buildout
ACRES
'/o
ACRES
0/0
ACRES
OA
Floodplain & Streams
Industrial R & D
Institutional
Office
Park
Residential Attached
Retail Neighborhood
Retail Regional
Rural
Single Family Residential High Density
Single Family Residential Low Density
Single Family Residential Medium Density
Transitional
Subtotal Land Uses (a)
TOTAL GROSS ACRES
Population
Population per Urban Acres
Population per Total Acres
15.6
0.0
11.6
0.0
29.8
0.0
0.0
5.2
1,477.3
0.0
330.4
318.9
0.0
2,188.8
0.65%
0.00%
0.48%
0.00%
1.24%
0.00%
0.00%
0.22%
61.63%
0.00%
13.78%
13.30%
0.00%
91.31
281.5
205.2
77.9
6.9
29.8
28.4
10.5
208.7
111.8
35.8
1,055.9
318.9
0.0
2,371.3
11.74%
8.56%
3.25%
0.29%
1.24%
1.18%
0.44%
8.71%
4.66%
1.49%
44.05%
13.30%
0.00%
98.93%
281.5
205.2
77.9
6.9
29.8
28.4
10.5
208.7
111.8
35.8
1,055.9
318.9
0.0
2371.3
2,397.0 100.007 2,397.0 100.00% 2,397.0
2,504 9,209 9,209
1.14
1.04
3.88
3.88
3.84 3.84
11.74%
8.56%
3.25%
0.29%
1.24%
1.18%
0.44%
8.71%
4.66%
1.49%
44.05%
13.30%
0.00%
98.93%
100.00%
Table 2-1C (Alum Creek Sewer Line)
POPULATION AND LAND USE PROJECTIONS FOR AREA 97-02B
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
LAND USE
2005 2015 Full Buildout
ACRES %o
ACRES
OA
ACRES
0/0
Floodplain & Streams
Industrial R & D
Institutional
Office
Park
Residential Attached
Retail Neighborhood
Retail Regional
Rural
Single Family Residential High Density
Single Family Residential Low Density
Single Family Residential Medium Density
Transitional
Subtotal Land Uses (a)
TOTAL GROSS ACRES
Population
Population per Urban Acres
Population per Total Acres
0.0
2.4
11.6
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
8.9
538.2
0.0
96.0
5.3
0.0
662.5
752.0
43
0.06
0.06
0.00%
0.32%
1.54%
0.00%
0.01 %
0.00%
0.00%
1.18%
71.57%
0.00%
12.77%
0.70%
0.00%
88.10%
100.00%
114.8
115.2
30.6
0.0
6.6
45.0
0.0
168.4
0.0
89.1
96.0
81.4
0.0
747.1
752.0
500
0.67
0.66
15.27%
15.32%
4.07%
0.00%
0.88%
5.98%
0.00%
22.39%
0.00%
11.85%
12.77%
10.82%
0.00%
99.35%
100.00%
114.8
115.2
30.6
0.0
6.6
45.0
0.0
168.4
0.0
89.1
96.0
81.4
0.0
747.1
752.0
500
0.67
0.66
' 15.27%
15.32%
4.07%
0.00%
0.88%
5.98%
0.00% •
22.39%
0.00%
11.85%
12.77%
10.82%
0.00%
99.35%
100.00%
Table 2-1D (Harley Water Line)
POPULATION AND LAND USE PROJECTIONS FOR AREA 99-01
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
LAND USE
2005 2015 Full Buildout
ACRES
OA
ACRES
°/u
ACRES
OA
Floodplain & Streams
Industrial R & D
Institutional
Office
Park
Residential Attached
Retail Neighborhood
Retail Regional
Rural
Single Family Residential High Density
Single Family Residential Low Density
Single Family Residential Medium Density
Transitional
Subtotal Land Uses (a)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.1
132.7
0.0
13.2
0.0
0.0
155.0
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
5.87%
85.61 %
0.00%
8.52%
0.00%
0.00%
100.00%
TOTAL GROSS ACRES 155.0 100.00%
Population 12
Population per Urban Acres
Population per Total Acres
0.08
0.08
57.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
21.2
8.7
0.0
43.9
0.0
0.0
21.4
0.0
0.0
153.1
155.0
106
0.69
0.68
37.35%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
13.68%
5.61 %
0.00%
28.32%
0.00%
0.00%
13.81%
0.00%
0.00%
98.77%
100.00
57.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
21.2
8.7
0.0
43.9
0.0
0.0
21,4
0.0
0.0
153.1
155.0
106
0.69
0.68
37.35%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
13.68%
5.61%'
0.00%
28.32%
0.00%
0.00%
13.81%
0.00%
0.00%
98.77%
100.00%
EXHIBIT B: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAMS
Table 2-2
CAPACITY DEMAND FOR EACH NEW LUE
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
-
AREA
BASIS
CAPACITY PER LUE FOR
WATER/SEWER LINES
Area 92-01 Graham Road Sewer Line Extension
Peak Day
1,068 gallons daily
Area 97-01 Spring Creek Sewer Line
Peak Day
1,068 gallons daily
Area 97-02B Alum Creek Sewer Line
Peak Day
1,068 gallons dail y
Area 99-01 Harley Water Line
Peak Day
668 gallons daily
SOURCE: College Station City Staff.
Table 2-3
CONVERSION OF LAND USES TO LIVING UNITS EQUIVALENT
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
LAND USE
LUEs PER ACRE (a)
Water Sewer
Floodplain & Streams
Industrial R & D
Institutional
Office
Park
Residential Attached
Retail Neighborhood
Retail Regional
Rural
Single Family Residential High Density
Single Family Residential Low Density
Single Family Residential Medium Density
Transitional
1.00
1.87
2.33
3.01
1.00
13.60
4.55
5.55
0.00
13.00
0.40
4.50
0.00
1.00
1.62
2.10
2.87
1.00
13.60
3.77
4.07
0.00
13.00
0.40
4.50
0.00
(a) Source: City of College Station, 2_13_08 Densities _ Update Report_Impact
Fees.DOC.
Table 2-4
WE EQUIVALENCIES FOR VARIOUS TYPES
AND SIZES OF WATER METERS
METER
TYPE
METER
SIZE
CONTINUOUS
DUTY MAXIMUM
RATE
(gpm)
RATIO TO
5/8" METER
SIMPLE
5/8" x 3/4"
10
1.000
SIMPLE
3/4"
15
1.500
SIMPLE
1"
25
2.500
SIMPLE
1_1/2"
50
5.000
SIMPLE
2"
80
8.000
COMPOUND
2"
80
8.000
TURBINE
2"
100
10.000
COMPOUND
3"
160
16.000
TURBINE
3"
240
24.000
COMPOUND
4"
250
25.000
TURBINE
4"
420
42.000
COMPOUND
6"
500
50.000
TURBINE
6"
920
92.000
COMPOUND
8"
800
80.000
TURBINE
8"
1600
160.000
COMPOUND
10"
1150
115.000
TURBINE
10"
2500
250.000
TURBINE
12"
3300
330.000
Table 2-5A (Graham Road Extension)
ESTIMATION OF LIVING UNITS EQUIVALENT FOR AREA 92-01
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
LAND USE
LUES PER ESTIMATED LUEs
ACRE (a) 2002 (a) 2005 2015 Buildout
Floodplain & Streams 1.00 0 10 10 10
Industrial R & D 1.62 400 63 67 83
Institutional 2.10 70 102 102 102
Office 2.87 0 0 4 15
Park 1.00 0 38 38 38
Residential Attached 13.60 0 582 582 582
Retail Neighborhood 3.77 0 0 0 0
Retail Regional 4.07 0 128 128 128
Rural 0.00 0 0 0 0
Single Family Residential High Density 13.00 0 0 0 0
Single Family Residential Low Density 0.40 200 23 33 64
Single Family Residential Medium Density 4.50 0 529 529 529
Transitional 0.00 0 0 0 0
Totals 670 1,475 1,493 1,551
Population per LUE 2.07
2.28 2.90 •
Table 2-5B (Spring Creek Sewer)
ESTIMATION OF LIVING UNITS EQUIVALENT FOR AREA 97-01
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
LAND USE
LUEs PER ESTIMATED LUEs
ACRE (a) 1997 (a) 2005 2015 Buildout
Floodplain & Streams 1.00 0 16 282 282
Industrial R & D 1.62 0 0 332 332
Institutional 2.10 27 24 164 164
Office 2.87 0 0 20 20
Park 1.00 43 30 30 30
Residential Attached 13.60 0 0 386 386
Retail Neighborhood 3.77 6 0 40 40
Retail Regional 4.07 0 21 849 849
Rural 0.00 0 0 0 0
Single Family Residential High Density 13.00 0 0 465 465
Single Family Residential Low Density 0.40 12 132 422 422
Single Family Residential Medium Density 4.50 227 1,435 1,435 1,435
Transitional 0.00 0 0 0 0
Totals 315 1,658 4,425 4,425
Population per LUE
1.51 2.08 2.08
Table 2-5C (Alum Creek Sewer Line)
ESTIMATION OF LIVING UNITS EQUIVALENT FOR AREA 97-02B
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
LAND USE
LUEs PER ESTIMATED LUEs
ACRE (a) 1997 (a) 2005 2015 Buildout
Floodplain & Streams 1.00 69 0 115 115
Industrial R & D 1.62 0 4 187 187 ,
Institutional 2.10 42 24 64 64
Office 2.87 0 0 0 0
Park 1.00 0 0 7 7
Residential Attached 13.60 0 0 612 612
Retail Neighborhood 3.77 0 0 0 0
Retail Regional 4.07 12 36 685 685
Rural 0.00 0 0 0 0
Single Family Residential High Density 13.00 0 0 1,158 1,158
Single Family Residential Low Density 0.40 14 38 38 38
Single Family Residential Medium Density 4.50 28 24 366 366
Transitional 0.00 0 0 0 0
Totals 165 126 3,232 3,232
Population per LUE .34 .15 .15
Table 2-5D (Harley Water Line)
ESTIMATION OF LIVING UNITS EQUIVALENT FOR AREA 99-01
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
LAND USE
LUEs PER ESTIMATED LUEs
ACRE (a) 1999 (a) 2005 2015 Buildout
Floodplain & Streams 1.00 • 0 0 58 58
Industrial R & D 1.87 0 0 0 0
Institutional 2.33 0 0 0 0
Office 3.01 0 0 0 0
Park 1.00 0 0 21 21
Residential Attached 13.60 0 0 118 118
Retail Neighborhood 4.55 0 0 0 0
Retail Regional 5.55 12 51 244 244
Rural 0.00 0 0 0 0
Single Family Residential High Density 13.00 0 0 0 0
Single Family Residential Low Density 0.40 5 5 9 9
Single Family Residential Medium Density 4.50 0 0 0 0
Transitional 0.00 0 0 0 0
Totals 17 56 450 450
Population per LUE .21 .24 .24
TABLE 2-6A (Graham Road Extension)
CIP INVENTORY AND COSTING FOR AREA 92-01
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
TOTAL
FACILITY TYPE / NAME CONSTRUCTION
COST
FACILITY CAPACITY
2005-2015
CURRENT 2005-2015 POST -2015
TOTAL CUSTOMERS GROWTH GROWTH
CAPITAL COST PER
COST LUE
MAJOR COLLECTION LINES
EXISTING FACILITIES
Phase 1
Phase 11
Phase 111
Subtotal Existing Facilities
FUTURE FACILITIES
None
Subtotal Future Facilities
TOTAL COLLECTION LINES
$372,994
$46,735
$53,789
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
96.98%
100.00%
91.37%
0.72%
0.00%
2.04%
2.30%
0.00%
6.58%
$2,667
$0
$1,099
$473,51
9
100.00%
%o
96.64% 0.80% 2.56%
$3,766
CONSTRUCTION COST TOTAL
$0
$473,519
$473,519
0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
$0
100.00% 96.64% 0.80% 2.56%
$3,766 $209.24
$209.24
TABLE 2-6B (Spring Creek Sewer)
CIP INVENTORY AND COSTING FOR AREA 97-01
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
TOTAL
FACILITY TYPE / NAME CONSTRUCTION
COST
FACILITY CAPACITY
2005-2015
CURRENT 2005-2015 POST -2015
TOTAL CUSTOMERS GROWTH GROWTH
CAPITAL COST PER
COST LUE
MAJOR COLLECTION LINES
EXISTING FACILITIES
Phase!
Phase 11
Subtotal Existing Facilities
FUTURE FACILITIES
None
Subtotal Future Facilities
TOTAL COLLECTION LINES
$631,215
$813,752
ot
49.
100.00% 79.80% 20.20% 0.00%
100.00% 49.50% 50.50% 0.00%
$127,493
$410,905
$1,444,96
7
100.00% 62.74% 37.26% 0.00%
aha
$538,398
CONSTRUCTION COST TOTAL
$0
$1,444,967
$1,444,967
0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
100.00% 62.74% 37.26% 0.00%
$o
$538,398 $194.58
$538,398 $194.58
TABLE 2-6C (Alum Creek Sewer Line)
CIP INVENTORY AND COSTING FOR AREA 97-02B
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
TOTAL
FACILITY TYPE / NAME CONSTRUCTION
COST
FACILITY CAPACITY
2005-2015
CURRENT 2005-2015 POST -2015
TOTAL CUSTOMERS GROWTH GROWTH
CAPITAL COST PER
COST LUE
MAJOR COLLECTION LINES
EXISTING FACILITIES
Phase 1
Subtotal Existing Facilities
FUTURE FACILITIES
None
Subtotal Future Facilities
TOTAL COLLECTION LINES
$214,271
%o
100.00% 3.90% 96.10% 0.00%
$205,917
$214,271
100.00% 3.90% 96.10% 0.00%
%o
$205,917
$0
0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
CONSTRUCTION COST TOTAL
$214,271
$214,271
100.00% 3.90% 96.10% 0.00%
$0
$205,917 $66.30
$205,917 $66.30
TABLE 2-6D (Harley Water Line)
CIP INVENTORY AND COSTING FOR AREA 99-01
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
TOTAL
FACILITY TYPE / NAME CONSTRUCTION
COST
FACILITY CAPACITY
2005-2015
CURRENT 2005-2015 POST -2015
TOTAL CUSTOMERS GROWTH GROWTH
CAPITAL COST PER
COST LUE
MAJOR TRANSMISSION LINES
EXISTING FACILITIES
Phase!
Subtotal Existing Facilities
FUTURE FACILITIES
None
Subtotal Future Facilities
$342,978
100.00% 12.44% 87.56% 0.00%
$300,296
$342978
100.00% 12.44% 87.56% 0.00%
$300,296
0
0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
TOTAL TRANSMISSION LINES $342,978
100.00% 12.44% 87.56% 0.00%
CONSTRUCTION COST TOTAL
$342,978
$0
$300,296 $762.17
$300,296 $762.17
Table 2-7
SUMMARY OF CAPITAL COSTS
UTILITY AREA
FACILITY TYPE
COST/LUE*
WASTEWATER 92-01
Major Collection
$209.24
Study Costs
$169.44
TOTAL CAPITAL COSTS
$378.68
WASTEWATER 97-01
Major Collection
$194.58
Study Costs
$1.10
TOTAL CAPITAL COSTS
$195.68
WASTEWATER 97-02B
Major Collection
$66.30
Study Costs
$0.98
TOTAL CAPITAL COSTS
$67.28
WATER 99-01
Major Transmission
$672.17
Study Costs
$7.74
TOTAL CAPITAL COSTS
$679.91
* An LUE is equal to use by a typical household with a 5/8" water meter.
TABLE 3-1A (Graham Road Extension)
CATEGORIZATION OF UTILITY DEBT FOR AREA 92-01
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
FACILITY TYPE / NAME
BOND ISSUE
FACILITY CAPACITY OUTSTANDING
DEBT
REMAINING
DATE TOTAL ISSUE PRINCIPAL
PRINCIPAL
FOR CURRENT PER CURRENT
TOTAL CUSTOMERS CUSTOMER
MAJOR COLLECTION
Phase 1
Phase 11
Phase 111
Subtotal Wastewater Collection
1993 $196,927 $75,272
1993 $24,674 $9,431
1993 $28,399 $10,855
$250,000 $95,558
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
96.98%
100.00%
91.37%
$49.50
$6.39
$6.72
$62.61
OUTSTANDING DEBT TOTAL
$250,000 $95,558
$62.61
TABLE 3-1 B (Spring Creek Sewer)
CATEGORIZATION OF UTILITY DEBT FOR AREA 97-01
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
FACILITY TYPE / NAME
BOND ISSUE
FACILITY CAPACITY OUTSTANDING
DEBT
REMAINING
DATE TOTAL ISSUE PRINCIPAL
PRINCIPAL
FOR CURRENT PER CURRENT
TOTAL CUSTOMERS CUSTOMER
MAJOR COLLECTION
Phase I
Phase!!
Subtotal Wastewater Collection
1998
1998
$314,523
$405,477
$236,285
$304,616
$720,000 $540,901
100.00%
100.00%
79.80%
49.50%
$127.84
$90.95
$218.79
OUTSTANDING DEBT TOTAL
$720,000 $540,901
$218.79
TABLE 3-1C (Alum Creek Sewer Line)
CATEGORIZATION OF UTILITY DEBT FOR AREA 97-02B
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
FACILITY TYPE I NAME
BOND ISSUE
FACILITY CAPACITY OUTSTANDING
DEBT
REMAINING
DATE TOTAL ISSUE PRINOIPAL
PRINCIPAL
FOR CURRENT PER CURRENT
TOTAL CUSTOMERS CUSTOMER
MAJOR COLLECTION
Phase 1
Subtotal Wastewater Collection
1998 $396,000 $297,496
$396,000 $297,496
100.00%
,3.90% $7.86
$7.86
OUTSTANDING DEBT TOTAL
$396,000 $297,496
$7.86
TABLE 3-2A (Graham Road Extension)
DERIVATION OF MAXIMUM IMPACT FEES FOR AREA 92-01
THROUGH THE EQUITY RESIDUAL MODEL
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
UTILITY / FACILITY TYPE CONSTRUCTION
COSTS
ALTERNATIVE ADJUSTMENT
MAXIMUM FEE AMOUNT
HIGHER OF
A or B
A B
Rate 50%
Credit Adjustment
A B
Rate 50%
Credit Adjustment
WASTEWATER UTILITY
$62.61 $104.62 $146.63 $104.62
$0.00 $84.72 $169.44 $84.72
$146.63
$169.44
Major Collection $209.24
CIP/Study Costs $169.44
Subtotal Wastewater $378.68
$62.61 $189.34 $316.07 $189.34
$316.07
TOTALS $378.68
$62.61 $189.34 $316.07 $189.34
$316.07
TABLE 3-2B (Spring Creek Sewer)
DERIVATION OF MAXIMUM IMPACT FEES FOR AREA 97-01
THROUGH THE EQUITY RESIDUAL MODEL
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
UTILITY / FACILITY TYPE CONSTRUCTION
COSTS
ALTERNATIVE ADJUSTMENT
MAXIMUM FEE AMOUNT
HIGHER OF
A or B
A B
Rate 50%
Credit Adjustment
A B
Rate 50%
Credit Adjustment
WASTEWATER UTILITY
$218.79 $97.29 ($24.21) $97.29
$0.00 $0.55 $1.10 $0.55
$97.29
$1.10
Major Collection $194.58
CIP/Study Costs $1.10
Subtotal Wastewater $195.68 $218.79 $97.84 ($23.11) $97.84
$98.39
TOTALS $195.68 $218.79 $97.84 ($23.11) $97.84
$98.39
TABLE 3-2C (Alum Creek Sewer Line)
DERIVATION OF MAXIMUM IMPACT FEES FOR AREA 97-02B
THROUGH THE EQUITY RESIDUAL MODEL
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
UTILITY / FACILITY TYPE CONSTRUCTION
COSTS
ALTERNATIVE ADJUSTMENT
MAXIMUM FEE AMOUNT
HIGHER OF
A or B
A B
Rate 50%
Credit Adjustment
A B
Rate 50%a
Credit Adjustment
WASTEWATER UTILITY
$7.86 $33.15 $58.44 $33.15 $58.44
$0.00 . $0.49 $0.98 $0.49 $0.98
Major Collection $66.30
CIP/Study Costs $0.98
Subtotal Wastewater $67.28 $7.86 $33.64 $59.42 $33.64 $59.42
TOTALS $67.28 $7.86 $33.64 $59.42 $33.64 $59.42
TABLE 3-2D (Harley Water Line)
DERIVATION OF MAXIMUM IMPACT FEES FOR AREA 99-01
THROUGH THE EQUITY RESIDUAL MODEL
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
UTILITY / FACILITY TYPE CONSTRUCTION
COSTS
ALTERNATIVE ADJUSTMENT
MAXIMUM FEE AMOUNT
HIGHER OF
A or B
A B
Rate 50%
Credit Adjustment
A B
Rate 50%
Credit Adjustment
WASTEWATER UTILITY
$0.00 $381.09
$0.00 $3.87
$762.17 $381.09
$7.74 $3.87
$762.17
$7.74
Major Collection $762.17
CIP/Study Costs $7.74
Subtotal Wastewater $769.91
$0.00 $384.96
$769.91 $384.96
$769.91
TOTALS $769.91
$0.00 $384.96
$769.91 $384.96
$769.91
EXHIBIT C: MAXIMUM IMPACT FEES
TABLE 6_3A (Graham Road Extension)
MAXIMUM IMPACT FEES FOR VARIOUS WATER METER SIZES
AREA 92-01, CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
METER
PE
METER
SIZE
MULTIPLIER
MAXIMU
IMPACT FE
SIMPLE
5/8" x 3/4"
1.000
$316.07
SIMPLE
3/4"
1.500
$474.11
SIMPLE
1"
2.500
$123.80
SIMPLE
1_1/2"
5.000
$1,580.35
SIMPLE
2"
8.000
$2,528.56
COMPOUND
2"
8.000
$2,528.56
TURBINE
2"
10.000
$3,160.70
COMPOUND
3"
16.000
$5,057.12
TURBINE
3"
24.000
$7,585.68
COMPOUND
4"
25.000
$7,901.75
TURBINE
4"
42.000
$13,274.94
COMPOUND
6"
50.000
$15,803.50
TURBINE
6"
92.000
$29,078.44
COMPOUND
8"
80.00a
$25,285.60
TURBINE
8"
160.000
$50,571.20
COMPOUND
10"
115.000
$36,348.05
TURBINE
10"
250.000
$79,017.50
TURBINE
12"
330.000
$104,303.10
TABLE 6_3B (Spring Creek Sewer)
MAXIMUM IMPACT FEES FOR VARIOUS WATER METER SIZES
AREA 97-01, CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
METER
PE
METER
SIZE
MULTIPLIER
MAXIMUM
IMPACT FEE
SIMPLE
5/8" x 3/4"
1.000
$98.39
SIMPLE
3/4"
1.500
$147.59
SIMPLE
1"
2.500
$245.98
SIMPLE
1_1/2"
5.000
$491.95
SIMPLE
2"
8.000
$787.12
COMPOUND
2"
8.000
$787.12
TURBINE
2"
10.000
$983.90
COMPOUND
3"
16.000
$1,574.24
TURBINE
3"
24.000
$2,361.36
COMPOUND
4"
25.000
$2,459.75
TURBINE
4"
42.000
$4,132.38
COMPOUND
6"
50.000
$4,919.50
TURBINE
6"
92.000
$9,051.88
COMPOUND
8"
80.000
$7,871.20
TURBINE
8"
160.000
$15,742.40
COMPOUND
10"
115.000
$11,314.85
TURBINE
10"
250.000
$24,597.50
TURBINE
12"
330.000
$32,468.70
TABLE 6_3C (Alum Creek Sewer Line)
MAXIMUM IMPACT FEES FOR VARIOUS WATER METER SIZES
AREA 97-02B, CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
(METER
PE
METER
SIZE
MULTIPLIER
MAXIMUM
IMPACT FEE
SIMPLE
5/8" x 3/4"
1.000
$59.42
SIMPLE
3/4"
1.500
$65.73
SIMPLE
1"
2.500
$148.55
SIMPLE
1_1/2"
5.000
$297.10
SIMPLE
2"
8.000
$475.36
COMPOUND
2"
8.000
$475.36
TURBINE
2"
10.000
$594.20
COMPOUND
3"
16.000
$950.72
TURBINE
3"
24.000
$1,426.08
COMPOUND
4"
25.000
$1,485.50
TURBINE
4"
42.000
$2,495.64
COMPOUND
6"
50.000
$2,971.00
TURBINE
6"
92.000
$5,466.64
COMPOUND
8"
80.000
$4,753.60
TURBINE
8"
160.000
$9,507.20
COMPOUND
10"
115.000
$6,833.30
TURBINE
10"
250.000
$14,855.00
TURBINE
12"
330.000
$19,608.60
TABLE 6_3D (Harley Water Line)
MAXIMUM IMPACT FEES FOR VARIOUS WATER METER SIZES
AREA 92-01, CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
METER
TYPE
METER
SIZE
MULTIPLIER
MAXIMUM
IMPACT FEE
SIMPLE
5/8" x 3/4"
1.000
$769.91
SIMPLE
3/4"
1.500
$1,154.87
SIMPLE
1"
2.500
$1,924.78
SIMPLE
1_1/2"
5.000
$3,849.55
SIMPLE
2"
8.000
$6,159.28
COMPOUND
2"
8.000
$6,159.28
TURBINE
2"
10.000
$7,699.10
COMPOUND
3"
16.000
$12,318.56
TURBINE
3"
24.000
$18,477.84
COMPOUND
4"
25.000
$19,247.75
TURBINE
4"
42.000
$32,336.22
COMPOUND
6"
50.000
$38,495.50
TURBINE
6"
92.000
$70,831.72
COMPOUND
8"
80.000
$61,592.80
TURBINE
8"
160.000
$123,185.60
COMPOUND
10"
115.000
$88,539.65
TURBINE
10"
250.000
$192,477.50
TURBINE
12"
330.000
$254,070.30
EXHIBIT D: IMPACT FEES CHARGED
ORDINANCE NO. 3060
TABLE 6_3A (Graham Road Extension)
MAXIMUM IMPACT FEES FOR VARIOUS WATER METER SIZES
AREA 92-01, CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
METER
TYPE
METER
SIZE
MULTIPLIER
MAXIMUM
IMPACT FEE
SIMPLE
5/8" x 3/4"
1.000 -
$316.07
SIMPLE
3/4"
1.500
$474.11
SIMPLE
1"
2.500
$123.80
SIMPLE
1_1/2"
5.000
$1,580.35
SIMPLE
2"
8.000
$2,528.56
COMPOUND
2"
8.000
$2,528.56
TURBINE
2"
10.000
$3,160.70
COMPOUND
3"
16.000
$5,057.12
TURBINE
3"
24.000
$7,585.68
COMPOUND
4"
25.000
$7,901.75
TURBINE
4" .
42.000
$13,274.94
COMPOUND
6"
50.000
$15,803.50
TURBINE
6"
92.000
$29,078.44
COMPOUND
8"
80.000
$25,285.60
TURBINE
8"
160.000
$50,571.20
COMPOUND
10"
115.000
$36,348.05
TURBINE
10"
250.000
$79,017.50
TURBINE
12"
330.000
$104,303.10
Page 63
ORDINANCE NO. 3060
TABLE 6_3B (Spring Creek Sewer)
• MAXIMUM IMPACT FEES FOR VARIOUS WATER METER SIZES
AREA 97-01, CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
METER
TYPE
METER
SIZE
MULTIPLIER
MAXIMUN�
IMPACT FE
SIMPLE
5/8" x 3/4"
1.000
$98.39
SIMPLE
3/4"
1.500
$147.59
SIMPLE
1"
2.500
$245.98
SIMPLE
1_1/2"
5.000
$491.95
SIMPLE
2"
8.000
$787.12
COMPOUND
2"
8.000
$787.12
TURBINE
2"
10.000
$983.90
COMPOUND
3"
16.000
$1,574.24
TURBINE
3"
24.000
$2,361.36
COMPOUND
4"
25.000
$2,459.75
TURBINE
4"
42.000
$4,132.38
COMPOUND
6"
50.000
$4,919.50
TURBINE
6"
92.000
$9,051.88
COMPOUND
8"
80.000
$7,871.20
TURBINE
8"
160.000
$15,742.40
COMPOUND
10"
115.000
$11,314.85
TURBINE
10"
250.000
$24,597.50
TURBINE
12"
330.000
$32,468.70
Page 64
ORDINANCE NO. 3060
TABLE 6_3C (Alum Creek Sewer Line)
MAXIMUM IMPACT FEES FOR VARIOUS WATER METER SIZES
AREA 97-02B, CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
(METER
PE
METER
SIZE
MULTIPLIER
MAXIMUIV�
IMPACT FE
SIMPLE
5/8" x 3/4"
1.000
$59.42
SIMPLE
3/4"
1.500
$65.73
SIMPLE
1"
2.500
$148.55
SIMPLE
1_1/2"
5.000
$297.10
SIMPLE
2"
8.000
$475.36
COMPOUND
2"
8.000
$475.36
TURBINE
2"
10.000
$594.20
COMPOUND
3"
16.000
$950.72
TURBINE
3"
24.000
$1,426.08
COMPOUND
4"
25.000
$1,485.50
TURBINE
4"
42.000
$2,495.64
COMPOUND
6"
50.000
$2,971.00
TURBINE
6"
92.000
$5,466.64
COMPOUND
8"
80.000
$4,753.60
TURBINE
8"
160.000
$9,507.20
COMPOUND
10"
115.000
$6,833.30
TURBINE
10"
250.000
$14,855.00
TURBINE
12"
330.000
$19,608.60
Page 65
ORDINANCE NO.
3060
TABLE 6_3D (Harley Water Line)
MAXIMUM IMPACT FEES FOR VARIOUS WATER METER SIZES
AREA 92-01, CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
(METER
PE
METER
SIZE
MULTIPLIER
MAXIMUIV�
IMPACT FEq
SIMPLE
5/8" x 3/4"
1.000
$769.91
SIMPLE
3/4"
1.500
$1,154.87
SIMPLE
1"
2.500
$1,924.78
SIMPLE
1_1/2"
5.000
$3,849.55
SIMPLE
2"
8.000
$6,159.28
COMPOUND
2"
8.000
$6,159.28
TURBINE
2"
10.000
$7,699.10
COMPOUND
3"
16.000
$12,318.56
TURBINE
3"
24.000
$18,477.84
COMPOUND
4"
25.000-
$19,247.75
TURBINE
4"
42.000
$32,336.22
COMPOUND
6"
50.000
$38,495.50
TURBINE
6"
92.000
$70,831.72
COMPOUND
8"
80.000
$61,592.80
TURBINE
8"
160.000
$123,185.60
COMPOUND
10"
115.000
$88,539.65
TURBINE
10"
250.000
$192,477.50
TURBINE
12"
330.000
$254,070.30
Page 66