Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/02/1994 - Regular Minutes - Historic Preservation Committee HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE REGULAR MEETING WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 1994 - 7:00 PM CENTRAL PARK CONFERENCE ROOM 1000 KRENEK TAP ROAD MEMBERS PRESENT: Gary Halter, Chairman; Florace Kling, Joan Lamkin, Lois Beach, Bill Lancaster, Greg Keith, Mary Jane Hirsch, Vernon Schneider. MEMBERS ABSENT: Gary Basinger, Deborah Jasek STAFF PRESENT: David Gerling, Special Facilities Superintendent; Pamela Einkauf, Senior Secretary I. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 7:07 p.m. by Gary Halter. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: There were corrections to the January 5, 1994, meeting. David Gerling stated that on page two at the bottom, during the discussion of the house on the East Bypass and 2818, he referred to the house as belonging to the Danby's. This was not correct, it belonged to the Dowell's. Also, on page four during the discussion of the houses being donated to A &M, the location was noted as Round Rock, and the location is actually Round Top. A motion was made to approve the minutes and seconded. The motion passed with no further discussion. III. REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS: No new applications to approve. IV. RICHARD CARTER GRAVESITE RELOCATION SLIDE SHOW: David Gerling said that several members had suggested showing the slides from the Richard Carter grave relocation so that the new members could see them. In September, 1991, Brazosland Realty, who had a buyer for the property just north of Richard Carter Park, contacted the Committee and asked for help in locating the gravesites which were located on the old Richard Carter homesite. Some pictures of the original Carter family cemetery, which were taken in the 1960's by Rebecca Landman proved to be invaluable. Since the pictures had been taken, all visible signs of the cemetery had been removed (headstones, and iron fencing). The theory is that Culpepper wanted to develop the property and didn't want to have to deal with the cemetery, so he obliterated it. It was thought that the headstones may have been dumped down the well on the Carter homesite, however, when the City acquired the property for the park, the Historic Preservation Committee Wednesday, February 2, 1994 Page 2 well was dug out and no headstones were found. To this day, the whereabouts of the original headstones is not known. With the aid of Mrs. Landman's pictures the Committee was later able to have Richard and Elizabeth Carter's and Helen Ligon's headstones reproduced. Frank Carter's headstone had to be guessed at. The Committee interviewed some people who had seen it, however it was mostly done by speculation about what would have been put on a child's headstone at that time. The unknown Carter family member's headstone stated simply "Unknown Carter Family Member ", since no one knows what it looked like. The original headstones were made of sandstone which is a fairly soft stone that breaks easily and makes it susceptible to vandalism. The reproductions were made twice as thick of granite, placed on a base, and concreted in. The pictures Mrs. Landman took were also used to help locate the graves themselves. One picture showed what appeared to be one tree (but was actually two) with an unusual branch pattern. By using the photo and lining up that shape in the trees and walking back and forth on the access road, they were able to determine where the photographer was standing when the picture was taken. From another picture taken at the opposite angle, they were able to determine an approximate area in which to begin searching for the graves. Kling Engineering was hired to help locate the graves. A cemetery service was hired to go in and clear away the brush and about six inches of soil. After this was done the headstone base for Richard and the headstone base and footstone for Elizabeth were found. Some hand tools were found in Richard Carter's gravesite, which had been dug at some point. Also found were a few pieces of the wrought iron fencing. It was estimated that the remains would be located about four feet deep, therefore, they dug about 3 - 3 1/2 feet with the machine, uncovering the last foot by hand. Once the remains were located each family member was placed in a separate concrete vault which was labelled at the head of the vault, so that when relocated to the new gravesite the remains would be facing east. In Richard's grave all that remained was a layer of what appeared to be dark fertile potting soil about an inch thick. Elizabeth had been buried in a cast iron coffin, which denoted wealth and was common in the northeast, but not in this part of the country. It's not sure how the coffin got down here. Helen Ligon's grave actually had skull and bone fragments found in it. It is still not known who Helen was or her relation to the Carter family. The next grave was unknown at the time, but later it was discovered that it was Frank Carter, the youngest son who had died at age 12. The top of his wooden coffin was intact, however, his remains were also dust. His was the oldest grave. There was also an unknown family member next to Frank. A total of five graves were relocated to the new site and a wrought iron fence placed around them. The remaining slides showed the reinterrment ceremony and the Carter family descendents who attended. Elizabeth Carter's family members, the Reed's, would not attend, even though there are some of her descendents living north of Bryan. Joan Lamkin handed out some information on Richard Carter entitled "College Station's First Settler ". Gary Halter stated that Richard Carter's original land grant, signed by Stephen F. Austin and Richard Carter, is in the Land Commissioner's office. Austin issued all the leagues in Brazos County as part of Stephen F. Austin's Second Colony. Elrey Ash with the City, had at one time, imposed over a map of College Station another map showing original league lines, and it was very interesting how many of the major thoroughfares in the City such as Texas Avenue, follow those old original league lines. Bill Lancaster stated that he has an abstract on his property that goes back to 1829. Historic Preservation Committee Wednesday, February 2, 1994 Page 3 Joan asked Gary if he could bring the old campus map that he has for the committee to look at. He said he would. Gary commented that the new Carter cemetery's position is roughly the same position as it was on the other piece of property. It's as though it was just picked up and moved over. Greg Keith asked if was possible to put markers on the original site if permission could be gotten from Scott and White. Scott and White hasn't responded well in the past. David said one reason they didn't respond before may have been that they did not own the property yet when the committee originally contacted them. Gary said that the committee would probably do something on the new site stating where the original cemetery was located, but the Committee could try to contact Scott and White again. The original site is suppose to remain in a wooded state and not be turned into a parking lot. Gary also suggested contacting Mayor Ringer to see if he would sign the letter that will be sent to Scott and White so it would have more impact. Gary recommended setting up a meeting with Scott and White first to discuss the feasibility of marking the original Carter gravesites located on their property. It was suggested that a group marker be put up instead of marking the original site of each individual grave. Greg asked if it would have more impact if we marked the site with a state marker instead of a city marker. Gary said he thought you could accomplish the same thing with a city marker and landscape the area, with a brick path set back off the street. Lois brought up the fact that since this was private property, Scott and White may have problems agreeing to this idea for insurance reasons. V. AUDIO CASSETTE OF RICHARD CARTER REINACTMENT: Joan Lamkin brought an audio cassette of the Richard Carter Reenactment made during the time that Bryan was having the Harvey Mitchell celebration. It gave a little bit of history on Harvey Mitchell and Richard Carter. VI. OTHER COMMITTEE CONCERNS: Greg said he had a class with Professor Woodcock who mentioned that David Godby, an architect employed at the Physical Plant at A &M, wanted to reconstruct the old railroad depot on campus. Amy Hammons, a student who had contacted the Historic Committee before, had done a report on the depot and Greg had a copy of it, which included some computer enhancements of the depot. Gary said the pictures in her report were not of the station that was the most remembered. The station in the photo was moved onto campus and used as a residence. Greg suggested talking to Godby and telling him that the station the Committee is most interested in reproducing is the one in the movie "We've Never Been Licked ", the one on all the calendars and that Jim Gaston did a rendering of. Greg suggested inviting David Godby to the next meeting to discuss this issue with him and see where he's going with it. Gary said that he felt that before the University would commit to doing a project such as this, it would have to tie in with the Bush Library in some way. Greg said he and David Gerling met with Ed Hard from Planning on the Bicycle Track and he was very receptive and enthusiastic. Ed told Greg and David that he felt that it would definitely qualify for ISTEA funding as a railroad corridor and also as a historic preservation path, however funding had already been applied for for this year. It appears that it may be another 4 -6 years before there is another call for applications. Ed said he would check on it for the Committee. One idea discussed had the track going down the railroad corridor on Wellborn and the other had it going down College, possibly tying it into the Interurban Trolley. Greg said he would research and see if he could find a trolley the same year and model. Gary felt that South College would be a good place to put a marker (when and if its approved by the State) and a trolley, Historic Preservation Committee Wednesday, February 2, 1994 Page 4 possibly with both Bryan and College Station participating. David said the Conference Center Advisory Board approached him with the idea of putting together some type of book or collection of old stories on the Brazos Valley. This would involve talking to a lot of people that are able to give verbal stories. There a few people on the Conference Center Advisory Board that would be willing to take microphones and tape any conversations with the people they talk to. Joan suggested checking with the high school to see if the students there might be able to do this as a senior citizen project. David Gerling said he would call the school to see if they did those type of projects. Gary Halter said that Deborah Balliew who did the history of College Station did a lot of tape recorded interviews with some of the older residents of College Station and they are in the University archives. A lot of those people are dead now. Some of those interviews were transcribed. The City did not at that time, and may not now, have an archival policy or library where you could store that type information and that's why it went to the University. Greg said that the Committee might get better quality work from college students instead of high school students. Gary also stated that knowing who to talk to and what questions to ask was important and that this may be a job for someone on the committee to undertake. Joan said she would be interested in working with the Conference Center Advisory Board to develop a plan to get that project started. Joan said there was already a list of people to talk to from when a video was done. Gary said there were people that may not be on the list who would be good to talk to such as Dick Hervey, former Mayor who is still alive. Lawrence Bravenec; Mrs. Burgess; Joyce Patronella Birdwell (her father was Lou Patronella); old Army Lou; Bill Fitch; Pat Bowden and brother Jim Bonnen; and Red Cashion, were names that needed to be on the list of people to interview. Greg suggested having a different list of questions for each group, since people in their 70's would remember different things than those in their 60's. Joan Lamkin said that taking pictures at least every ten years was important. Gary Halter agreed using the example that no one could find an old picture of the original College Station City Hall (Cafe Eccell). The restaurant wanted a picture to hang on the wall and no one has been able to locate one. Greg suggested looking through old city newspapers to see if there was a picture taken when City Hall opened. If someone could find out within a few weeks of when it opened it would make the search easier. David said that in order to inform citizens, and to get the historic plaque program rolling again, he had placed an ad on the City information channel. He also informed the Committee that Jane Kee with the City Planning Department had contacted him about using bond money in the Northgate area to do some facade development. The time frame would be between the 40's and the 60's. She said she would like to meet with the Committee to get their ideas. David suggested holding a special meeting, and noon on February 18th was agreed upon. Gary said he would lean towards the 1940's time frame for reproducing the facades at Northgate. Greg suggested taking out the existing parking spaces and putting in a boardwalk. Greg asked what area at Northgate was specifically being discussed and David told the Committee he understood it to be everything from Wellborn up University to the Texaco station. Gary said there was a special zone for that area that has to do with off - street parking and the area doesn't have to meet the City's standards for off street parking. He didn't remember the specifics, but stated that it allows for redevelopment without imposing off - street parking requirements. Greg commented that he wondered if Dudley's and Dixie Chicken for example would be allowed to remain the same. He felt that the owners would have a hard time being convinced to change their storefronts to another style. Gary Halter discussed the Henkel Square project briefly stating that he wasn't sure if the project would come off because of the money involved. Mrs. Bivey Historic Preservation Committee Wednesday, February 2, 1994 Page 5 owns the 26 buildings in Round Top. Three of those buildings were original to Round Top with the remainder being moved there from somewhere else and meticulously restored. Gary said there were several factors which hampered the project. One was the uncertainty of whether the buildings are really available. The McDonald Foundation out of Dallas gave away about 9 million dollars last year and has expressed an interest in funding it and has talked to Chancellor Mobley about it. Both Governor Clements and his wife belong to that foundation board and are pushing this project. Supposedly, he has convinced Mrs. Bivey to give them to A &M. The uncertainty here is that she has also offered them to the University of Texas and the University of Houston and could offer them to someone else. The Henkel Square Committee that Steve Beachy and Gary are on, have been instructed not to contact Mrs. Bivey, so they are working up a proposal to present to the McDonald Foundation basically to fund this. A point that was brought up was what the impact might be on Round Top if these buildings are moved. Also the cost involved in moving that many buildings here and setting them up would be close to a million dollars. That is with the understanding that the land itself would be donated by the City. The University would like to tie the project in with the Bush Library. Another $4 million would be needed to endow and maintain this project. Then there is the problem of what would be done with the buildings after they are moved here. Would they just sit there or would businesses move in (restaurants, antiques, etc.) that would draw people in? The City of Round Top does not want to get rid of the buildings, but they don't belong to Round Top, they belong to the Bivey family. No one is sure of the exact value of the estate. Supposedly Mrs. Bivey is also willing to donate, along with the buildings, a warehouse full of furniture which has been rumored to have been appraised at several million dollars. However, no one knows where that is and the Henkel Square Committee is not allowed to contact her. Gary said the Committee discussed the idea of leaving some of the buildings in Round Top (like the Henkel House which was originally there) in order to mitigate the damage to the community - possibly even donating the land to Round Top. Something else that came up was that the brochure on Henkel Square states that The Texas Pioneer Heritage Foundation manages the buildings. If there is such a foundation it's not registered with the IRS or the Attorney General's office, nor do they have a Tax Exempt ID number. It may be that the Foundation is Mrs. Bivey, but there is no way to find out. At one point she was going to give the buildings to the University of Houston but they could not come up with the money to endow it, and she was concerned about what would happen to all her work after she died. Lois said it would be nice if all the schools could get part of it, because it was too much for any one organization - the cost of keeping it up would be enormous. Greg said that even though it doesn't tie into the history of A &M, it is Texas History. Gary said that it would seem that if the University were going to spend that much money on the project, it should tie in some way with the history of A &M, or the City, enhance the mission of the University, or tie in with the Bush Library. Gary said he would try to bring the pictures and information on the project to the next meeting. VI. ADJOURN: The meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m. t d x GG'G99l �}'3 •�k L N a r , i ''N + ha ' :'y, n I yr •. rN ^!: ut r I - - 0 INN CD 11111111 Ism lima son. "' Cr) al 4 N mi•+ o as U Y! 1 .? ( 1 y y t t 1 h Ci • v s 2.. 1 l'r _ y'� t a.: 1� ! • i L ' ' 7M( U '1 w` t 1y 's' . CC Cti 4- EMI= ...., um. ' t �!t :a 1 ' " r � 1 d a ' a , 4 , ' v y q 'r k g ` s t. �• FvE e ; V -. .... '� .3ra ° y 8 e 'a�' 4�' i 4 .E y . � •b s s a �< : ft) ' . 4 � 1 '�" d R ,{ t k 0 L� � a , r t n � r � a � � Cr) , ' " .:f ',I, .a ,pct ? >3 ..:lar� F S . , ,A f 0 , ,,, ,. , r 0 s ,i ;" 5,';1 O C N - ` C U o • I Q ▪ u) a) 0 rn L a) C w � O O i OU—``: ca r) oU oU 3 a co w L as . � N 8.a >, N • N L L = 2 O> cd N L O d O I Hm al 0 m a U 4 a) 0 Q) m ° O c N V P. L O O m j m O w O t +' t0 :70 >. c-0 E m ai .� X73 ;. .0 0 0.1 I- - m vim m U ° v� m E �vv� c o a c m c x ii O m e U N a °p c �°co - 3 cm o• �ayi C 0 N I m 5 L L E m` w w _ G) t m ! q fn m f] E "- m t L E .20c '- !A . L . .` ++ 3 N . a �,, - U E a) in _a w - �' E �c° C CO m n m s s > 0 E C �n �'�~ 2_0(1! �° O mm :E- cv ° �L �cuooz,° m?•m C O m0 EE ` l EU m m0mO "-coxcv) •- > a) m N C a. ° • N ° •c 0 -0 m 0 c '- - 8 -' m us 0 c 2= co c U n L- > m° m ; N 3 u w 0)0m�W`aaci-m� 4-. I �nOWcoO v� c = a)��>.�' m � 3 �NYUp s mc 0� >,� ° -c mo c° - "- i - a`,'� a� � " m s�� toc m i aF t - c c aa � i > , c >, �.� m C ). mcu o co ���� 3Cmco +-o cov m _ O _ > 3 co In E 0 tai x m co > rn a0 y, m m U co E ,r la ..c „ .c ° cu co � p N • `aD >,�coc. n mU >v)c zm3c as..=.._ = ci f m - . .. v� ° . ° c 0 Qm m u� m °>r m Caa 7 c a c m o a � i = .r y o'c 3 3a a$ m ° al 'C 7 ° Ti C C C L m :1-) +. O t �.. m m a O .- , _ , 0 ,_ L 0 Q Ca >. _ .c •-• c u � E 2 o — 'a te � > cq.. �,— co m�U. .. ��. 3 E >. N c 3 _o N a o c ,� 0 ao ° v ° '- o v . � c -'.� Q a �_•°+- a�co�m ocowy. -0CD m c L1 - a oco 42 , onoE ca`�cgc t> rn L o ) ( w � n m r m .- . ► -`o ) a CC a ) C �' ° E ° o >�c � . . c ,E• • m >, 3 _ c o U co E sa O m o a> a• n �U u � U ° 9? at r el_C c »r z ° = > .. � o a� D c -mE co t,L� .�O t E ° U cnmm�co m m� v Cmrn m� - E v 3 O � '_ g m L� W ct c t m m me m Lao — •- c 5. � � p .>:, > 0 -C .. w CZ al e m • � m � O c c � � E cv � � rn co i 3 co • � � a p � O v O � w � .. = L � m m o;u ca N cot cn4- c m - a) a m v O - c .. cv m °� c > m C CD 0 m m U c m m 0— U 3 E v > v) CO a L O m > r -- 0 m E v v) Q iu .N. 0 O U w cti ° - -E 03 6 c° o ;E a => > m ° " c I- a� > t o E U O .-• v cn E 0 `-L -. m vin... m m (2) aom ! E L C o - m 15 c C ) 5. O C .- co ca « s a c� m 1-- C O m m O a m c O as O w •t7 0 -- _ C O O C C '0 v (D N a) >. 0 cU >: Q) C N N ce ocwcoas — ca>>cccro. • •o m� Env)' - E<33 O L co 12 If — u L . co V O >> N N ccs N ` O L Y L y U N V. w= " O a0 O> O C O d 1 " O 0 V) V L W 0 �� O a) L . '... I. ) CO CU N Q) N 0) QO S 45 E5128 uaras t ... —° 3 v C 0) V O O :�'-' - C Z" - E C � C c a)� as a) N. o . c t '- o 4. 4. a)O ...(0 0 " ". aoCg)w» -. d ° C allers a) L O N 4 E t C ' a) ' m > C O co . a l • 3 \ `$ El..) as E ms > 0 3 1) v 2d ° E . c c 8 v o c ca O E :33 -C2 c0 a) . ms � v o, V o ms a) Z ° o c 03 V . al r co ° (n >„ \ w Q , to a) w O m N C m O (, .. ms N 0 = .. \ , a in 0 E C 3 >:,' C C3 u) + � ' O j a . O Ca 0 Y3 . o ■ H O p p O ?�? j O C O ~ O p N a• 3 P w ` '" A c. U m CO > u) m3 0 Ct a r CO r m cU • 2 a i '' 4 :t . 0 s v :p., U N V Z 0 aC -0 CP m) O° 0 y u) a) '0 O m3 >. O L z � x o OY a)Ow �, cUCUN� � � u,� O m? v a O CD O° D O r 0) u) L :- O O "' a cU n C N C E UA .... ' >x� �v u, •- ms a) mE o 0 13 a a V m o c tasa)cn 3 ° 3 (n '— > v w c «. E � cU = ca -- as a .. L � � a) a o a 3 ° o \ ca 3 p E n3 �oa� m aL 3 N a) c MI _ C O »- y O U a) O 3 mi O O D ` \ CD 0)L TO CD L .-. CAN N E enueny sexel O O O _ ca 0 a) 0 E T Nw Y UU � O o,c CO .O 0 US a) O n .O. a) 13 t CL O w-C a) 2 0) — t as t 0 ` a — CD - 0 = • 0 aa) 0 u) 0 as 0 c 13 o C '0 a) C N c° =" C al .0 L 3 ( d i O E o a• C E ai N O 10 '> C CO •»- C C c` a)13 c a) a) N >; a) > ; N N p � >. • N ... o v O o 1- x E �. 0. O .a .. m E > o. .. t- U O 0 a u « N u ( as v) E 3 o c m v 3 >, v c"U «>. a) m rn a) c o N N `► , � ,, N O- O m3 ON y C M L'- E cU ms O + M - 6 I ; , ' ! 3 C 0 0 L 4 > co O C Cl.) > c0 .•. Y — a) a) O N <' - .. - I t . i , "f 4 ` ! d =°13C130 ° 3 C C r 0 .71).. . 0 L '' 4 ' � , t + � - ?'t: c iUy p i Ua) 0-,., a) vycU m N ` m 2' 3_N4 r .7.7-' y l t , : =; , ►�i� a; ° > 0 t C +. C - Y ` U O > t , - 7 . . . O 0 E ~ t..♦ ;f T ^,� x!'1 Y ' t. �% «. 0 Y 9 E L • U � r I 2 a) :t -. y a) N a) 4? Q) � i d' • J ) C' 5 , 3 ,- . � ;° CO 0:1) o 3k x m U o 1) )vM U >“) > m 0 0 0 c e � . 4 , . t yi — W - cc>. c 0 c ` a 2U� � o�m>.>;�- mm Omsa) w c O0 a) � t E ) C, �c 'r. 1 r/ m m, � Cr inN a; `• E c c« N . c c 3.., _ cUa jp0 : i i � < r - — L a ° .c -5 :°_ `° � Uc - °2 3 cU -- N U V_ v 1 t . ` L. U N mf E O a) 0 o C mt r- N —13 mf c r` ; .. ��, K. ` Q C a)LUao L MS C . c •>. E C C� a) a)L C U )_ A..; t ' . " if co O C " °� a a) v O > = " vi N Y >> HCa )a) " °3 L L 0 ° 3 ., ;' 4 ' , .. C. MI t • Af > ` O m3 `�V >. >, as - w �r O Q� �m CU O C- as .,- �}{ t. U �- 7 lU U a) ... as m U .- 0 -0 C u) /3 0 N Y Sti ;�F L. 12 ca > N 0) a ) O - 1- - - C E m as 0 -0 u 3 r, O-C ° L l7 O ` 3 C A h '. . ( O as E .,- as 0 0 L " It_ U 4., -_ d] y S AP . . ' s • . r.. .0 0 al m3 C ► O O N O N 3 ,_ 'O �; N N o c L 0 L 0 71 - '' - .. .1 ' .. w.. 3 0 m L c0 >. C 4 - " CC .". N O a) > O d a) H V) 0 O y c9 a ) w C C rr i r, '" r / 1 . 11 a) c C O .., L •` C L 07 C t cU C .. a — (U 0 3 C it . , ti k 3 , 5 .. coQrY O Cntn.r._ o c) ■E .- as.. E a) co Um 0 M_ as ^� • • 4,