HomeMy WebLinkAboutQuimby-McCoy Proposal
•
•
•
•
• Proposal for the
• Inventory and Survey of Historical Structures
• and Places in the City of College Station
•
•
r r
• r
Y4 • ~6
•
City of College Station, Texas
• February 16, 2007
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
' {M ■ Quimby McCoy Preservation Architecture LLP
• 't ■ 3200 Main Street, #3.6
Dallas, Texas 75226
•
•
•
•
January 16, 2007
City of College Station
• Purchasing Department
1101 Texas Avenue
P.O. Box 9960
• College Station, TX 77842 delivered electronically
• Dear Selection Committee:
Thank you for the opportunity to submit our qualifications for an Inventory and Survey of Historical Structures
• and Places in the City of College Station. Your historic resources, and the connection that many of them have to
Texas A&M University, are unique to your city and the means of regulating those resources can be also be tai-
lored to the community it serves.
With the addition of Principal Nancy McCoy, AIA, our firm has recently undergone a change in name, from Mar-
cel Quimby Architecture/Preservation Inc. to Quimby McCoy Preservation Architecture, LLP (Quimby
• McCoy). While the name has changed, our focus on excellence in our historic preservation practice, has not.
Quimby McCoy offers professional experience in historic renovation, restoration, preservation planning, guide-
lines for historic structures and districts, historic resource surveys, architecture, historic building evaluations,
• master planning and research of historic properties. Our specialization in historic preservation and our service
within the preservation community, including the National Trust for Historic Preservation, the Texas National
• Register Review Board, the City of Dallas Landmark Commission and other preservation agencies, provides us
• with a comprehensive understanding of historic resources, how they are regulated, and the community's role in
that process. We have also provided professional services to many municipalities across Texas and in Oklahoma.
• It is my hope that our proposed team, which includes my partner, Ms. McCoy, local historic preservation consult-
ant Professor David Woodcock, "Discover Dallas Survey" Director Katherine Seale, and archivist/researcher
• Rachel Roberts will be selected for this project. We are a team that has a long and interconnected history to-
gether. Ms. McCoy was a student of Professor Woodcock's in the 1980's and has been active in his Center for
Heritage Conservation (CHC) as a Fellow. Quimby McCoy is currently working with the CHC Research Founda-
tion on a master plan and documentation of Niblo Park for the City of Dallas. As a former President of Preserva-
tion Dallas, I have known and worked with Ms. Seale since the inception of the Discover Dallas Survey. Ms.
McCoy, Mr. Woodcock, Ms. Seale and myself all meet the criteria established as the Secretary of the Interior's
Standards for Qualifications for Architectural Historian, and Ms. McCoy, Mr. Woodcock and myself also qualify as
Historical Architects and Architects. Ms. Roberts has assisted Nancy McCoy with research on Fair Park projects
since 1999.
• We appreciate the opportunity to introduce ourselves and we hope you will agree that we are highly qualified to
provide these historic preservation planning services to the City of College Station. No addenda were received.
• Sincerely,
' Marcel Quimby, FAIA
• Principal
Response to
Request for
Qualifications
a. Competence and Qualifications of the Individual
• Marcel Quimby, FAIA will be the Project Leader for this project.; her full resume and specific project de-
scriptions are provided at the end of this Response. Ms. Quimby brings three levels of perspective to the Col-
lege Station survey and ordinance preparation:
Experience preparing surveys, designation and preservation criteria (guidelines)
Experience regulating preservation criteria and ordinances, and training of regulators
• Experience utilizing, in her architectural practice, criteria and ordinances
Her experience with similar survey, designation and preservation criteria (guidelines) includes::
• City of Fort Worth City-Wide Historic Preservation Plan, 2003
Downtown Dallas Commercial Historic District Nomination (and Survey), 2002
i City of Grapevine Historic District Design Guidelines, 2004
Oklahoma City Design Guidelines, 2002
City of Round Rock Design Guidelines, 2001
City of Mansfield Design Guidelines, 2006
Her experience regulating preservation criteria and ordinances, and training of regulators includes:
• City of Dallas Landmark Commissioner, 1999-2006
i City of Dallas Landmark Commissions' Designation Committee, 1984-present
• Preservation Training for cities and Landmark Commissions including the City of Dallas Landmark
Commission annual training, and specialized training for cities of Denison, Rockwall, Georgetown,
S Grapevine, the Texas Historical Commission Conference, the National Alliance of Preservation Com-
mission Conference, and others.
• Her experience utilizing, in her architectural practice, criteria and ordinances includes:
Newton County Courthouse Restoration, Newton
Opal Lawrence Farmstead Restoration projects
• Parkland Hospital, Dallas
Many other projects-residential and commercial-following local ordinance criteria or the Secretary
of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties
• The specific criteria for item (a) is addressed below and in Ms. Quimby's resume at the end of this Response:
• (1) Educational background... Ms. Quimby holds a Bachelor of Architecture degree.
• (2) License status.....Ms. Quimby holds an active Texas Registration; number provided on resume.
(3) Continuing education.....Ms. Quimby exceeds both the State of Texas Department of Regulation
• and Licensing requirements for continuing education and the higher standard established by the
• American Institute of Architects.
. (4) Technical publications Ms. Quimby has published and lectured widely; a selective list is provided
• following her resume.
I•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
a. Competence and Qualifications of the Individual-continued
•
• (5) Participation in technical code or standard.... Ms. Quimby serves in a policy making role on a
regular basis in her community leadership role, including her role as National Trust Advisor for Texas.
•
• (6) Documented specialized design expertise.....is demonstrated by Ms. Quimby's professional and
community focus on historic preservation.
•
• (7) Descriptions and examples of specific projects or studies.....includes the examples described
under criteria ( c ) and in Project Profiles found at the end of this Response.
•
•
b. Technical Adequacy of the Personnel and Sub-consultants
• Marcel Quimby will be supported by a team with extensive experience in project management, preservation
• planning, architectural history, including College Station's history in particular, and in research, survey and in-
ventory and ordinance writing. The team will be composed of the following key individuals (resumes can be
found at the end of this Response). Reponses to items (1) - (8) are incorporated into each resume:
•
• Nancy McCoy, AIA, Principal of Quimby McCoy, will serve as Project Manager and will be responsible for
scheduling, budget and quality control. Ms. McCoy brings 20 years of experience with historic preservation;
• most recently, she has developed a preservation plan for Fair Park, a National Historic Landmark. Ms McCoy
• has been working on "Military Walk" on the Texas A&M campus and is a graduate of the University.
. David G. Woodcock, FAIA. Preservation Consultant, of College Station has been a member of the College
Station community since he began teaching architecture at Texas A&M over 40 years ago. He will serve as an
• Advisor to this project, and will bring his knowledge of the city's history and the architectural context for that
history to the team.
• Katherine Seale, Preservation Consultant, will advise the team on the development of survey technique and
presentation. She will also advise on the opportunity for community involvement, should the City of College
Station wish to make that possible. Ms. Seale has led the extensive Survey Dallas effort for Preservation Dallas
since 2002.
• Rachel Roberts is currently completing her Masters of City and Regional Planning degree at the University of
• Texas at Arlington while consulting on research projects. Ms. Roberts will support the team as research assis-
tant, and will participate in the survey and inventory work.
• The specific criteria under consideration item (b) is addressed in each key individual or sub-consultant resume,
• and specifically on the following page for Nancy McCoy and David Woodcock.
We recommend that on Attorney with experience in the preparation and interpretation of historic preservation ordi-
nances be included in the City's team for this effort. We would be happy to make a recommendation, should the city not
have this expertise in-house.
•
•
I•
•
•
•
•
•
• b. Technical Adequacy of the Personnel and Sub-consultants-continued
•
• For Ms. McCoy:
(1) Educational background.....Ms. McCoy holds a Bachelor of Environmental Design, a Master of
Architecture and a Master of Science in historic preservation.
• (2) License status.....Ms. McCoy holds active registrations in New York and Texas. License numbers
• provided on her resume.
• (3) Craft or applicable.....Ms. McCoy holds a Certificate in Masonry Conservation.
•
• (4) Continuing education.... Ms. McCoy exceeds the minimum requirements of the Texas Department
of Licensing and Regulation requirements for continuing education and the higher standard established
• by the American Institute of Architects.
• (5) Technical publications Ms. McCoy has published and lectured; a selective list is provided
• following her resume.
• (6) Participation in technical code.... Ms. McCoy has served on the International Existing Building
S Code review body for Dallas and is active in professional organizations.
(7) Documented specialized design....Ms. McCoy has specialized education and twenty years of
• experience focused on historic preservation.
• (8) Descriptions and examples.....includes the examples described under criteria ( c ) and in Project
• Profiles found at the end of this Response.
•
• For Professor Woodcock:
(1) Educational background.....Professor Woodcock holds a degree in Architecture and a Diploma
• in Town and Country Planning.
(2) License status.....Professor Woodcock no longer maintains an active registration.
•
(3) Craft or applicable.....not applicable.
• (4) Continuing education.... not applicable.
(5) Technical publications Professor Woodcock has been published and has lectured extensively;
a selective list is provided following his resume.
(6) Participation in technical code....not applicable.
(7) Documented specialized design....Professor Woodcock is a leader in the field.
•
• (8) Descriptions and examples.... provided in Mr. Woodcock's resume at the end of this Response.
•
•
c. Demonstrated experience of the Prime Firm
• Quimby McCoy brings over six years of experience with similar projects, and the Principals of Quimby McCoy
• bring a combined 45 years of experience in historic preservation to our clients. The firm's experience in the
area of preservation planning, survey and inventories, research and determination of historic significance, and
. writing of preservation ordinances is best described by the following projects. Response to items (1) - (5) is
included in the Project Profiles at the end of this Response.
City of Fort Worth City-Wide Historic Preservation Plan (profile provided): This plan was comprehen-
sive and involved extensive survey, inventory and public participation.
City of Dallas, Downtown Commercial Historic District National Register nomination (profile pro-
vided): As an incentive to development in downtown Dallas, the city wanted to establish a historic district that
would make access to Investment Tax Credits more easily attainable for private property owners, thereby en-
couraging the preservation of those buildings.
• City of Grapevine Design Guidelines (profile provided): The City of Grapevine commissioned design
• guidelines including detailed design and technical information; this design and technical component provides
owners, architects and contractors of historic buildings basic design perspective for historic buildings as well as
. detailed technical construction and 'how to' information for working with these historic buildings in Grape-
vine's historic districts.
• Oklahoma City, OK Preservation Plan and Design Guidelines (profile provided): The City of Okla-
homa City requested design guidelines for nine existing residential historic districts and future districts; this
process also included a comprehensive evaluation of their review process and historic ordinance. To facilitate
• community input, the team led over 20 community meetings to discuss the needs of the individual residential
districts and publicly discuss the direction of new, coordinated guidelines for these current and future residen-
tial historic districts, garnering public input. Once the residents and public 'bought into' and made contribu-
tions to the process, the new Guidelines were finalized and submitted to existing and potential districts for
approval prior to their submittal to the Preservation Commission and City Council.
• City of Dallas, Park and Recreation Department, Fair Park Ordinance (profile provided): a plan to
guide the development of Fair Park, a National Historic Landmark district, included creation of a data base for
• each historic building on the campus, design guidelines and the complete re-writing of the historic district ordi-
nance. *
City of Grand Prairie CBD Master Plan: (profile provided): a plan was created to encourage development
• in downtown Grand Prairie by focusing on that city's history with WWII preparedness and 1940's and 50's
architecture that is predominant in the downtown area. *
• Design Guidelines and Preservation Training to various Municipalities including Round Rock, Rock-
wall, Grapevine, Georgetown, Dallas's Landmark Commission and City Planning Commission, and others.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
d. Demonstrated Success of the Prime Firm
•
• The firm has three municipal clients, with whom the firm's Principals have worked for over six years : the City
• of Mesquite, (8+ year relationship), and the City of Dallas (9+ year relationship by Nancy McCoy working with
the City of Dallas as the Principal or Project Manager of projects while at ARCHITEXAS, prior to joining
• Quimby McCoy), and the City of Grapevine (7 year relationship). These three clients illustrate our success
with multiple projects that include both master planning, guidelines and architectural projects. Project Profiles
• for these clients are provided at the end of this Response.
• City of Mesquite projects include a master plan for the historic Opal Lawrence Farmstead site and the restora-
tions of various structures on the site.
City of Dallas Park and Recreation projects include current projects such as the Renovation of the Cotton
Bowl, Tietze Park Restoration, the Downtown Parks Master Plan and Fair Park projects. City of Dallas projects
• for the Development Services Department include the Downtown Dallas Commercial Historic District Na-
tional Register Nomination and for Public Works, the Old City Hall Historic Structures Report.
•
• City of Grapevine projects include the Design Guidelines for Commercial and Residential Historic Districts,
preservation/guideline training and the restoration of the historic (c. 1870's) Nash Farmstead.
•
• e. Demonstrated Commitment of Prime Firm
•
• Quimby McCoy's success is the City of College Station's success and the firm is committed to provide excel-
lent service throughout the life of the project. We seek to establish long-term relationships with our clients
• and those relationships can only be developed through excellent experiences together. Our record with the
. cities of Dallas, Mesquite and Grapevine demonstrate long-term relationships that have evolved as we have
worked with these municipalities on numerous projects over the years.
•
• f. Prime Firm History with Cost Estimates and Budgets
•
• Cost estimates are not a service associated with this project;, but we typically provide them for our projects.
• (1) Prime firm's record......is found in our completed past projects. Refer to Project Profiles.
• (2) Responsiveness to budget.....there are many ways we can assist a client with budget control,
• including regular "testing" of the budget, evaluating the design for constructability and "value engineer-
ing" options. We can also design bid alternates into the documents to provide some flexibility in the
• final bid amount that is accepted.
• (3) Procedures utilized.... In our area of specialization (preservation architecture), we prefer to work
• with consultants and industry leaders who also have specific experience with historic properties. One
of the difficulties in estimating work for historic buildings is in defining the scope of work sufficiently
prior to starting construction. We strive to achieve this level of knowledge about project cost through
the use of probes and testing during the design phase. This increased knowledge of existing conditions
• helps us to identify scope and therefore costs, more accurately.
•
•
I~
• g. Prime Firm's Capacity and History of Performing Work
Quimby McCoy will dedicate the resources described in this report, and additional resources as needed, to
• complete this project within the expected timeframe. In addition to our proposed team, the firm will utilize
additional staff during the survey phase of the project.
. (1) Capabilities of the proposed team ...We commit our firm resources to this project as follows:
• Marcel Quimby, Project Leader 60% of her time
Nancy McCoy, Project Manager 30% of her time
David Woodcock, Advisor 15% of his time
. Katherine Seale, Advisor 05% of her time
Rachel Roberts 30% of her time
• The above percentages describe the level of commitment to the project brought by the members of
our team, on average, over the course of the project. However, there will be more intense periods of
work, such as the research phase or the survey phase, where the dedication may be 100% over a
• shorter period of time.
• (2) Coordination efforts and procedures of team members not at the same locations.... The
team is located primarily in Dallas and in College Station. Internal meetings will be held on a monthly
basis, or more often during the most intense portions of the work, such as the survey either in Dallas
• or College Station. The City will be invited to attend any of the internal working meetings at their
• option, but regular meetings specifically with the City will also be held for each phase of work.
i (3) Contingency plan.... There is contingency in having two principals involved in this project and this is
proposed to ensure that there will be Principal involvement in the project at all times. In addition, the
level of experience brought by the Quimby McCoy Principals and Professor Woodcock will help to
• ensure that the expertise will be available, even in the unlikely event that the Team Leader was not
• able to complete the project.
' (4) Current workload capacity..... The firm's current known workload is $211,000 for the next nine
months. Projects that are expected to start during the next nine months total an additional $156,000.
Our current manpower capacity includes others in addition to consultants Mr. Woodcock and Ms.
• Roberts. Quimby McCoy utilizes architects and intern architects as contract labor on a regular basis,
allowing these professionals to work with the firm in a flexible manner. It is our intension to utilize
• such full or part-time contract labor during the survey phase of the project, to accommodate these
• short periods of intense effort
• (5) Scheduling methods......A project schedule will be developed at the beginning of the project with
• input from the City of College Station. This schedule will include periodic milestones with correspond-
ing presentations to the City, community meetings, city planning and council dates and other relevant
information. Once the schedule is established and approved by the City of College Station, Quimby
• McCoy will monitor it on a regular basis and review with the City to ensure this is met.
g. Prime Firm's Capacity and History of Performing Work-continued
• (6) The firm's resources include five computers with Windows XP operating system, Microsoft Office
2003 software (Word, Excel, Publisher, Powerpoint, etc.), CAD and other commonly used graphics
software.; the firm has laser printers, inkjet printers and a large copier, two digital cameras and two
• 35-mm cameras with multiple lens. Large-scale plotting is done at a local reprographics firm with files
typically sent electronically.
h. Proposed Approach
• The approach conceptually includes the following tasks:
Data Collection and Research
• Survey and Inventory/Documentation
Recommendations for resource protection
Implementation of the recommendations
• Ordinance preparation
• (1) Organization of the team...... includes the following:
• Marcel Quimby Project Leader
Nancy McCoy Project Manager
• David Woodcock Project Advisor, Local and Architectural History
Katherine Seale Project Advisor, Survey
Rachel Roberts Research Assistant
•
(2) Project leadership and rePorting•••••will be led by Marcel Quimby. Nancy McCoy will serve as the
primary contact for contracts and correspondence with the City of College Station's Project Manager.
• Marcel Quimby will also be available to the City and will serve as the primary contact for team mem-
• tiers.
• (3) Sub-consultants roles.....are all supportive roles to the prime firm and will report to Quimby
McCoy. Additional sub-consultants may be added to the team if needed, including GIS database con-
suiting or special programming consulting, to be determined.
• (4) Interface with City.....will be primarily with the Project Manager, Nancy McCoy. Marcel Quimby, as
• the Project Leader, will also interface with the city and will be involved in all aspects of the project.
• (5) Coordination plan with user groups.....is an important part of any government and community
• plan. A complete plan will be developed by the team with the city of College Station, and will be in-
corporated into the project schedule. Typically, the coordination plan will include user group meetings
at each phase of the completion of each significant task, in order to obtain input and consensus from
• the community prior to proceeding with the project. It is anticipated that there may be certain user
• groups, such as neighborhood organizations, that will want to participate in the development of the
work on a regular basis. There will also be presentations to the general public.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• h. Proposed Approach-continued
•
. (6) Work plan.....provided here is the beginnings of a comprehensive project work plan and schedule
• that will incorporate the team, the city of College Station, and the stakeholders-community leaders
as well as the general public. This work plan will include the following components:
•
Data Collection and Research 1.5 month
• The Quimby McCoy team will collect data, maps, meet w/ appropriate parties within the City. review
• previous research by the City of College Station, the County Historic Commission, Texas A&M Uni-
versity, public libraries and other available sources described in the RFQ. This information will be
reviewed for pertinent information useful to the project and reviewed with the City.
• During this early stage of the project, a Stakeholders Meeting will be held to provide an overview
• of the project, solicit input from stakeholders and discuss the project schedule and milestones.
• Survey and Inventory/Documentation 2 months
Following the collection of data and research, a physical survey of historic resources within College
• Station will be conducted. This will begin by a 'windshield' survey of all properties within the city and
an identification of individual structures that may be historic as well as areas or districts of with his-
toric merit, these will be photographed digitally. The results of this survey will be documented in
• THC's database format, and incorporated into a survey report.
• Recommendations for resource protection I month
. Draft recommendations for the protection of the City's historic resources will then be prepared and
presented to the City; such recommendations may include the creation of selected historic districts
• (local and national register), and conservation districts. Markers and other forms of historic identifica-
tion may be considered for those resources where legislative protection is not appropriate.
• Upon approval by the City, this information will be presented to a Stakeholders Meeting for review
• and comment. These comments will then be finalized and presented to the City for approval.
Implementation of the recommendations I month
Upon approval of the recommendations for resource protection, an implementation plan will be de-
veloped in conjunction with the City; this Implementation plan will identify the tasks (new ordinances
• or revisions to existing ordinances and/or new City policies or changes to existing policies).
The resulting recommendations will be presented to a Stakeholders Meeting and followed by a
• Public Meeting to present this plan and receive comments from the public.
Ordinance preparation 3 month
• The team will then prepare an ordinance and design guidelines format with related graphic materials
such as maps and diagrams as required to effect these recommendations. After a review of a Draft
• Ordinance by the City Attorney's office, the Ordinance will then be presented to the city bodies that
• will approve and enact it, assumed to include the Planning Commission and the City Council.
Public meetings as required will also be provided.
•
• Total time-frame 8.5 months
• ' 1r
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
i. Knowledge of the City of College Station
•
• Quimby McCoy has knowledge of the City of College Station through our association with Professor Wood-
cock, and through the educational background of two of our four remaining key team members. David Wood-
cock brings over forty years of involvement with College Station as an architect, conservation architect and
• historian, as well as a resident, to the team. Over the course of those years, all of which have been spent teach-
ing architecture at Texas A&M University, he has advised students on projects in the College Station and Bryan
community, and he has served as a preservation consultant on projects in Bryan and in the nearby cities of
• Franklin and Calvert. His knowledge of this region's history and specifically its architectural history, is extensive.
•
• j. Prior Experience with an Existing Project
• Quimby McCoy has no prior experience with this project.
•
• k. Demonstrated Ability to work with City Staff
Quimby McCoy has no prior experience with the City of College Station. However, we invite you to contact
• other city clients regarding our ability to be responsive and cooperative with respect to project management,
• schedule and budget requirements, comments, suggestions, design rationale and project alternatives.
•
•
•
• Quimby McCoy would like to spend "time"
• with your historic preservation department
• and the community to create a preservation
ordinance that is tailored to College Station's
M residents and their historic resources.
ANN
•
•
•
•
•
• Marcel Quimby, FAIA
Principal
• Marcel Quimby, FAIA, is a distinguished leader in Dallas'
preservation community. Her experience ranges from com- Bachelor of Architecture, University of Lou-
• plex restoration projects such as the Newton County Court- isiana at Lafayette, Cum Laude, 1978
house, which will be substantially reconstructed, to extensive
historic resource nominations such as the Downtown Dallas
• National Register nomination. Also in downtown Dallas, she Hellmuth Obata & Kassabaum (HOK)
has prepared a preservation plan for Dallas' historic Municipal Henningson Durham & Richardson (HDR)
Building and served as the preservation planner for the Down-
town Parks Plan. Her work experience includes the develop- Brown Reynolds Watford (BRW)
ment of ordinances, training for Landmark Commissions and
the preparation of preservation criteria for numerous cities
• across Texas. She is a former Landmark Commission and has Texas Historical Commission, National Reg-
served on its Designation Committee for over twenty years, is inter Board, Ex Officio, 1999-2007
• an Advisor to the National Trust for Historic Preservation and
National Trust for Historic Preservation,
is a former President and active member of Preservation Dal- Board of Advisors, 1998-2003
las and the AIA Dallas. Her leadership skills and commitment
• to the community earned her Preservation Dallas' highest Preservation Dallas, President, 2001/2002,
• honor - the Dorothy Savage Award. Historic research, pro- Board of Trustees, 1996-2003
gramming new uses, and solving preservation and architectural American Institute of Architects member
• problems are her passions. since 1980; elected to College of Fellows,
Ms. Quimby has provided services to many municipalities to 1997; Dallas Chapter President, 1995
• identify historic resources, develop guidelines, and to train Dallas Landmark Commission, 1987-1989;
Landmark Commissions including. Designation Committee, 1983- present
•
Dallas Friends of Fair Park, Board of Trustees,
•
Fort Worth 1997-2003
• Denison Greater Dallas Planning Council. Treasurer,
Round Rock 2003-2006; Board of Directors 1999-
Mansfield present;
Longview
• Mesquite
Georgetown Dorothy Savage Award for Excellence in
• Rockwall Preservation, 2006
Grapevine Presidents Gold Medal, American Institute of
Oklahoma City, OK Architects, 1992
• Texas License No. 8609
NCARB Certificate No. 30,073
Marcel Quimby, FAIA
• Principal
Selective Publications, Lectures and Exhibitions
i Updated for Posterity, review of the Sixth Floor Expansion, Dallas, published in Texas Architect magazine,
• March/April 2003.
• A Single Building Code - Will It Work? Article published in Southern Building Code Congress International's
"Newsbriefs," Building Official and Code Administration's "BOCA" magazine, and the AIA Building Code and
Standards' Spring 1994 newsletter.
• Oak Cliff Weighs Succession, article published in Texas Architect, September/October 1990. These articles
discussed the concept of Oak Cliff, an area with a population of 300,000, and comprising 1/3 of Dallas' land
area, seceding from Dallas and establishing itself as a separate municipality.
Model Preservation Criteria for City of Dallas Landmark Program; these model criteria establish guidelines for
• changes to the City's' historic landmarks. Co-authored in 1990 with the City Attorneys' office, with subsequent
revisions in 1996.
• Dr. Benjamin Bluitt and the Bluitt Sanitarium, Dallas History Conference, Dallas Texas; January, 2007.
'State, Local and National Designations' program for preservation Dallas' Summer Sizzlers program, Dallas, Texas;
• July 2004.
'Design Review Workshop' for Dennison Historic Preservation Advisory Board, Denison, Texas; May 2004.
• `Preservation Overview, Design Review Guidelines and Questions & Answers Wrap-Up Session' for Dennison Historic
Preservation Board, Denison, Texas; May 2004.
• 'Historic Preservation as an Economic Development Tool' program at the Architecture Lecture Series of the Gregg
County Historical Museum, Longview, Texas; February 2004.
'Unique Code Considerations for Historic Buildings' program at Texas Society of Architects convention, Fort Worth;
November 2003. (w/ Daniel Thien, PE, David Gonzales, TDLR).
• 'Design Guidelines for Historic Properties and New Construction' programs at the Revitalizing the Urban Vil-
lage Conference in North Texas; October 2003.
'Trends in Historic Preservation and Neighborhood Revitalization' at the Revitalizing the Urban Village Conference in
North Texas; October 2003.
a 'Design Review Workshop' City of Rockwall Historic Preservation Advisory Board, Rockwall, Texas; June 2003.
• `Conducting a Legal and Efficient Historic Preservation Commission Meeting' seminar, Texas Certified Local Govern-
ment Conference, Granbury, Texas; February 2003.
• "Historic Designation - What is it?" at Preservation Dallas' Historic House Specialist Seminar; annually or
• bi-annually, 1995- present
Nancy McCoy,AIA
Principal
Nancy McCoy, AIA, is an award-winning preservation archi-
tect with twenty years of national experience. She has a broad Master of Science in historic preservation,
• range of project experience that includes highly complex $ 100 Columbia University, 1986
million dollar projects such as the adaptive use of Kansas
• City's Union Station and more intricate conservation work Master of Architecture, Columbia Univer-
si 1986
. associated with the preservation of historic murals at Fair Park tyin Dallas. She has designed additions for the Department of Bachelor of Environmental Design, Texas
• the Interior Building in Washington DC as well as for smaller A&M University, 1981
• residential structures such as Paigebrooke Farm. Her strength Masonry Conservation Certificate, RE-
is in finding a balance between the conservation of historic STORE, 1990
• resources and modern-day safety, function and aesthetic goals
• for the continued use of historic buildings. She currently
serves a Treasurer of the Association for Preservation Tech-
. nology International and as Chair of the Historic Resources David Smotrich & Partners
• Committee of the Dallas Chapter of the AIA. She has prac- Ehrenkrantz Eckstut & Kuhn Architects, PC
ticed in New York and in Washington, DC prior to moving to ARCHITEXAS
Dallas in 1997. The interpretation of the Secretary of the Inte-
rior's Standards - a philosophical basis for historic preserva-
tion - has been a career-long focus that is further developed
Association for Preservation Technology
with each project.
International (APT) Board of Directors,
Ms. McCoy has nine years of experience on multiple projects Treasurer 2005-present
• with the City of Dallas as well as experience with other mu- City of Dallas Landmark Commission, CBD
nicipalities that include: and Fair Park Task Force, 1997-present
• Dallas, Park and Recreation Dept. American Institute of Architects member
Dallas, Public Works since 1990; Vice President, Dallas Chapter,
2001, Chair HRC, 2002-present
Dallas, Planning Dept./Development Services
Grand Prairie Texas A&M University Center for Heritage
Waxahachie Conservation Center Fellow, 1998-present;
Granbury Chair, Advisory Council, 2000-2002
Bonham Dallas Arboretum, Construction and Design
New York City Review Committee, 2007-present
• City of Dallas International Existing Building
Code Task Force, 2003
Preservation Dallas Board of Directors, Sec-
retary 1998-2004
• Oak Cliff Foundation Board of Directors,
Texas Theatre Committee, 2001-2004
• Texas License No. 17785
New York License No. 021089-1
• NCARB Certificate No. 54,959
Nancy McCoy,AIA
Principal
Selective Publications, Lectures and Exhibitions
• "The Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Preservation Criteria", for the City of Dallas Landmark Commission
. Training Program, 1998, 2001 - 2006
. "A Monumental Mural Challenge - Protecting Outdoor Painted Works", presented to the Association for Preservation
Technology International, Atlanta, GA, 2006.
• Visiting Lecturer, Texas A&M University, College of Architecture, Historic Preservation Coursework, 1998 -
• 2006
• "Mothballing and Moving Historic Structures", Preservation Texas Symposium, 2004
"The ADA and the Texas Accessibility Standards for Historic Structures", State Organization of Landmark Preservation
• Commissions, 2002
Centennial Building Rehabilitation, online profile for National Park Service, 2002
"Tenth Street Historic District - Past and Future," to the community; Program Chair, Historic Resources Committee
• of Dallas Chapter of the American Institute of Architects, 2002
Faded Glory - the Art of Fair Park, Texas Architect magazine, 2001
• "Fair Park: the Protection of Outdoor Murals," presented to the American Institute for the Conservation of Artistic
and Historic Works/Museum Symposium, Dallas, 2000
Roundtable Series on "Preservation in Affordable Neighborhoods" and "Design in Historic Contexts," Program Chair for
Preservation Dallas, 1999.
• "Careers in Historic Preservation" for Texas A&M Historic Resources Imaging Laboratory Symposium, 1999
• "House Moving," Speaker and Host for Oak Cliff Restoration Workshop series, 1999
"Interpreting the Secretary's Standards" Symposium for the New York Chapter of the AIA, Program Chair, 1997
• Governors Island Design Competition, Preservation and Urbanism Committee of the Municipal Arts Society, for the
Van Allen Institute; exhibited and published entry, 1997
• New York Civic Center Exhibit exhibition design and content development, Preservation and Urbanism Com-
mittee, Municipal Arts Society, New York, 1996 exhibit and publication.
Roundtable Series Moderator, Preservation and Government, Preservation and Urbanism Committee, Municipal
• Arts Society, 1996
"The U. S. Custom House: Fine Art Conservation Procurement," presented to the Association of Preservation Technol-
ogy International, Washington DC, 1995
David Woodcock, FAIA
Historic Preservation Consultant
College Station, Texas
David Woodcock, FAIA, FSA, FAPT. has a professional
degree in Architecture and a Diploma in Town and Country Architecture and Diploma, Town and Coun-
Planning from the University of Manchester, England. try Planning, University of Manchester
Teaching appointments include the University of Manches-
ter, and the Kent Institute of Art and Design School of Ar-
chitecture (now a part of the University of Kent) in Canter- University of Manchester
bury, England, and as a Fulbright Teaching Fellow at Texas University of Kent
M A&M University from 1962-66. He returned to Texas A&M
. University in 1970, and became a Full Professor in 1975.
At Texas A&M University, Professor Woodcock coordi- American Institute of Architects, Historic
nates the interdisciplinary, raduate Certificate in Historic American Buildings Survey Coordinating
g Committee
Preservation in the College of Architecture. He teaches
graduate and undergraduate courses in historic preservation American Institute of Architects, Advisory
and design, and serves as Director of the college's Center Committee, Historic Resources Committee,
for Heritage Conservation. He has written for Architectural 2005-present
Review (UK), Association for Preservation Technology In-
ternational APT Bulletin, Texas Architect, and other publica- Association for Preservation Technology,
• tions. Since 1977 he has directed numerous projects to the President 1999-2001
• standards of the Historic American Buildings Survey Chair, Historic Sites Advisory Committee,
(NABS), some of which have received the Peterson Prize for Texas Parks and Wildlife, present
HABS documentation. Peer Reviewer, U.S. General Services Ad-
ministration, Design Excellence Program
David Woodcock maintained an architectural conservation
• practice in Canterbury, England from 1964-70, and since State Parks Advisory Committee
• 1970 has consulted on numerous projects in Texas, includ-
ing Grimes County Courthouse, Anderson, several historic
residential restoration and rehabilitation projects. He con- Fulbright Teaching Fellow, 1962-1966
sulted on the master planning of the Washington-on-the-
Brazos State Historic Site, and for the Carnegie Library in Texas A&M Association of Former Students
• Franklin as a consultant to Brown Reynolds Watford, Archi- 1990ty Distinguished Achievement Award,
tects (BRW). For the City of Bryan, he consulted with BRW
again on the Visitor Center and for the Old Municipal Build- College of Fellows, American Institute of
• ing adaptive use and restoration for the Children's Museum Architects, 1992
of the Brazos Valley with Fred Patterson, AIA. He served as
a consultant to Mathes Group on the Palace Theater, also in ACSA Distinguished Professor by the
Bryan. In College Station, he has remodeled and restored 1991 n of Collegiate Schools of Architecture,
the Pruitt Residence of 1934, the Aurand Residence of the 1991
• 1930's, and the Strawn Residence of 1935, all in historic College of Fellows, Association for Preserva-
• districts. tion Technology International, 2004
Fellowship, Society of Antiquaries of Lon-
don, 2004
•
•
•
• Rachel Roberts
• Research Assistant
. Fort Worth, Texas
•
• Rachel Roberts has extensive experience with research
• and with archive management. She has worked with the Pursuing Masters in City and Regional Plan-
Dallas Historical Society for over seven years, where she ning, University of Texas at Arlington, 2005 -
served as Collections Assistant and later, as Archives Direc-
• tor, Registrar and Librarian. Her responsibilities included in Bachelor , Arts Texas with A&M University, in French; Minor
research, writing, editing, production of a newsletter, assist-
ing with the design and creation of exhibits, and fund-raising University of North Texas, 1994-1995
• through grant writing. In addition, she researched history-
related questions for both remote and in-house patrons,
• Wrote articles, website text and other documentation. Dallas Historical Society, Fair Park
• Prior to her work with the Dallas Historical Society, Ms. Preservation Dallas
Roberts worked with Preservation Dallas on the "Discover
• Dallas" survey project that will ultimately include a GIS-
• based website database that will include all of the city of Onstage in Bedford, 2000 - 2004
Dallas' historic resources. As a member of the Property
• Research Committee from 2002-2006, Ms. Roberts gained Memorial Student Center Student Confer-
extensive experience with researching historic properties ence on National Affairs Committee, 1996-
and with survey documentation in the city of Dallas. 1998; Vice Chair, 1996-1997; Round-Table
• Host, 1998Xxxx
Ms. Roberts is currently working toward a Masters in City
• and Regional Planning from UT Arlington. He has received Metroplex Archivists, 1999 -present
• academic honors that include the Dean's List, the Presi-
dent'sList, Alpha Lambda Delta Honor Society, Phi Eta Collections Managers Committee, 2000-2006
Sigma Honor Society and is the recipient of an American American Planning Association„ 2006 -
• Planning Association scholarship.
present
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Katherine D. Seale
Survey Advisor
• Dallas, Texas
Katherine Seale is the Project Director of an architec-
tural survey being undertaken by Preservation Dallas with Masters of Architectural History, University
• funding from the City of Dallas called "Discover Dallas." of Virginia, 2001
The survey includes Dallas' historic neighborhoods and Sig- Bachelor of Arts in Art History, Southwest-
. nificant landmarks. This five year project was designed to ern University, Georgetown, Texas, 1998
help neighborhoods develop identity, nurture character, and
build capacity for preserving their neighborhoods. By train-
ing volunteers to identify the characteristics that make-up
National Park Service, White House Liaison
their neighborhood, residents were given the tools to un- Office
derstand their community's resources and options for pre-
serving them. Thomas Jefferson Academical Village
• Responsibilities include:
Presentations at neighborhood meetings during all City of Dallas Landmark Commission, Desig-
stages of the project from recruitment to vol- nation Committee, 2005-present
• unteer trainings to survey results;
Conduct neighborhood charrettes, identifying areas
of stability, areas of enhancement, and areas of
• change;
Organize weekend volunteers for field surveys,
research, photography, and data input;
• Interact with the City of Dallas to create historic
and conservation districts;
• Identify and write designation reports for significant
properties and neighborhoods at the local,
state, and national level.
Key Accomplishments:
Led and educated more than 500 volunteers in 45
neighborhoods through trainings, field surveys
and archival research;
Created training manuals as well as residential and
• commercial survey forms that are database
compatible;
Coordinated the procedural infrastructure for the
• project, which has culminated in establishing 4
professional committees to help with the func-
tional requirements;
•
•
•
•
•
Fort Worth Citywide
Historic Preservation Plan
• Fort Worth, Texas
• This Preservation Plan provided Fort Worth
• with a 'map' for future protection, enhance-
. ment and promotion of their unique historic
culture through their historic resources.
Existing preservation tools such as the pres-
s
• aria " . ervation ordinance, existing resource sur-
3 i veys, preservation incentives and their im-
w.~~ pacts on the city's policies were analyzed.
^ Goals and strategies for future action were
developed including citywide surveys, en-
z« hancements to their preservation ordinance,
j i recognition that public education and com-
munication are cntical to the program. Ad-
• - r ditional goals and strategies included pro-
. w, grams to increase designation of historic
properties, developing a CA review proc-
• esses, that preservation incentives and devel-
• opment of new policies to benefit preserva-
_ tion in Fort Worth be provided. Fort
• Worth continues to implement this Preser-
vation Plan. Preservation consulting services
• Kx were provided to Looney Ricks Kiss on this
.a~ L ~ project.
•i
-[=J 0 L'~ - r
• I- ~ JL[7E V_ (JL'1 ` - Mr. Fernando Costa, AICP
I •JCI~' C7JL-1 ~J J L I[=1 -T Director
•
L-=-~L7 • L I lJ L~ 0 C~ C _ ; 4__ Planning Department
C~ J J C L C°~ C~ I z=~~s. City of Fort Worth
i~~ ~(l L~-~i01~~ jFQ I 100 Throckmorton St.
7 I f Ll C7 [J -7 Fort Worth, TX 76102
• , _
I!-IIJLJL-L~LJi-1[ 1 817871-8000
'<;'n~ C~~ -
• ~~/<J~,>`i / 17 ~~I 11= ~s~ ; not applicable
o
• not applicable
a~ °1rJL7 - a
] - 2002-2003
•
• I ~ C r`= i
RE 1
•
•
•
•
•
Downtown Dallas Commer-
cial Historic District
National Register Nomination
Dallas, Texas
• A nomination for establishing downtown
Dallas as a historic district on the National
Register of Historic Places was prepared for
+ the City of Dallas's Economic Development
office. The historic district status will en-
! courage the redevelopment of historic prop-
111 erties in a twenty-five-block area of down-
town through the use of federal investment
ljl I!1 ilr tax credits. The district also recognizes and
ylj j 11 l lit celebrates the importance of Dallas' down-
• fill, ~If lit l'1 a. town while educating residents, visitors and
l jltl lI' building owners about the collective and
n 111 Itl i individual history of the buildings. The period
(1 Ilj jlI Ill 11 of significance for the district is 1888-1958.
•°`j+, e, 61 jjj all, ' Dallas is perhaps best known for its mid-
fill 4 Ill , . it century modern architecture and many of
' 11
'if Ijl 1 Dallas's significant post-war buildings are
'A~•!f 1 jll
r ■ 1 III jjj 111 1(1 11; { F~ Iincluded in this district. Encompassing 102
buildings in 21 blocks, this district is one of
m nlla'
TIT 11 I j 11. s<i pi i iu1r1 the largest downtown NR districts in the
and includes some of the "youngest"
111 It( j!1 L: • lk!!L count
iii rY
• 111 11111111: buildings (post 1950 The nomination was
r~ ss " 1!~'p 111 11111( 1~: ff`'tt prepared with Lila Knight, architectural his-
Ill ill Il:. r f tt torian.
v
~ c'I 11~ IU Ill 1!{ "I
11
j;. ' Mr. Karl Stundins
• 1IIr ' Economic Development Department
u
City of Dallas
. 1500 Marilla, Second Floor
• Dallas, TX 75201
214 670-1690
25 blocks of downtown
Not applicable
200x-200x
Design Guidelines for the
City of Grapevine
• Grapevine, Texas
• Although Grapevine was one of the early
communities to develop guidelines for their
historic districts in the mid-1990's, these
• were quite outdated and inadequate by cur-
rent standards. Additionally, Grapevine de-
sired guidelines that were more educational
r in focus, with the intent that if property
owners and contractors better understood
i the design background and history of their
' . historic buildings, they would approach res-
toration and rehabilitation work with a more
informed approach. These new guidelines,
for Grapevine's residential and commercial
• districts, address design and planning issues
e as well as provide technical information on
building components such as window repair
• and accessory building design guidance; they
• serve as a guide for restoration, renovation
and new construction within these historic
areas.
Mr. David Klempin, RA
Historic Preservation Officer
City of Grapevine
200 South Main St.
Grapevine, TX 76099
817 410-3197
not applicable
• ®O not applicable
L 2005-2006
W
MOW- M
Oklahoma City Design
Guidelines
and Historic Preservation Ordinance Review
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Oklahoma City had minimal (or no) guide-
w y lines to assist residents in their nine historic
districts in the restoration of their homes or
when making exterior changes to these
homes; this frequently resulting in confusion
• and much dissent between these neighbor-
hoods and the city. To provide guidance to
these existing and future historic districts
• and the city's Preservation Commission,
. Oklahoma City requested a comprehensive
evaluation of their review process and his-
{ t, '
toric ordinance, and development of new
• ' af.~" guidelines. As part of this project, the team
• t r, led over 20 community meetings to discuss
the needs of the individual residential dis-
tricts and publicly discussed the direction of
new, coordinated guidelines for these cur-
rent and future residential historic districts,
garnering public input. Once the residents
• and public 'bought into' and contributed to
the process, the new Guidelines were sub-
_ - mitted to existing and potential districts for
approval prior to their submittal to the Pres-
ervation Commission and City Council.
- - _ - i' Mr. Russell Claus
• 3' - - Principal Planner
Planning Department
_ City of Oklahoma City
429 W. Main St. 9th Floor
Oklahoma City, OK 73102
405 297-1628
nine historic districts
not applicable
2002-2003
Fair Park Comprehensive
Development Plan and
• Preservation Ordinance
Dallas, Texas
• " 7 # The Fair Park Comprehensive Development
i' Plan incorporated design, historic preserva-
tion, State Fair of Texas development, eco-
nomics, neighborhood access, marketing, and
implementation/management components to
• ,
establish an integrated plan to guide the Park
t ° for the next twenty-five years. The Plan fo-
cused on maintaining the existing year-round
• C, ~t tenants in the Park-the museum institu-
k tions. Support for these institutions included
expansion and exterior exhibits, better main-
tenance and a more precise understanding of
the constraints involved with the site's Na-
tional Historic Landmark status. Design
• guidelines were prepared for alternations,
- additions and new construction. Using these
• o guidelines, the Historic District Ordinance,
incorporating 207 acres and 30 historic
0e s • buildings, was re-written. Nancy McCoy
. • • served as Project Manager/Architect for AR-
® • o p CHITEXAS, as consultants to Hargreaves &
• Associates.
• - 19360uilGiny loolq,nl
non-IWIaiC WiMpy
Ms. Louise Elam
permmM new mnnuuaron
Park and Recreation Department
• City of Dallas
1500 Marilla St., Room 6FS
Dallas, TX 75201
214 670-5275
207 acres; 30 buildings
• Approximately $2 billion estimated
• Comprehensive Plan 2002-2004
Ordinance 2005-2006
Grand Prairie CBD
Development Plan
Grand Prairie, Texas
• _ A master plan for the revitalization of Grand
Prairie's downtown district was prepared
_J ,Y based upon a physical, economic and historic
analysis. The historic analysis brought to
focus the city's raison d'etre - World War II
preparedness. Although the city began as a
traditional railroad town early in the 20th
century, the bulk of development happened
during the 1940's and 1950's post war. Re-
storing the downtown buildings, signage and
R streetscape to this era will make this a very
• unique place in the region. A set of nine
"projects" were developed for implementa-
tion. The plan was developed with a city-
A appointed group of stakeholders who
- - reached consensus about the plan. Nancy
• McCoy served as Project Manager/Architect
. i r r for ARCHITEXAS.
• z- 1 Ms. Diane J. Miller
Director
• l f~i r~ s Economic Development Department
City of Grand Prairie
• a • l r ;I 317 College St.
• ~ i_ Grand Prairie, TX 75050
~`'1: - k, 972 237-8160
u
not applicable
not applicable
doom
,emu ~
1999-2000
I~
I~
Opal Lawrence Farmstead
Restoration
Mesquite, Texas
• The restoration of the Lawrence Farm-
stead's 1874-1882 residence, 1887 barn, and
• 1920s Range house was undertaken for the
City of Mesquite as part of a phased restora-
tion program. The structures comprise the
• n~• Opal Lawrence Historical Park and will illus-
trate the late 19t' century agricultural heri-
tage of the Mesquite area. The work has
included historic research, physical investiga-
n tion and condition assessments, master plan-
ning and full architectural services for the
• z , stabilization of the Range house and restora-
tion of the residence and barn, as funding is
. s available. New electrical and mechanical sys-
tems were carefully integrated without dam-
age to the decorative ceiling finishes and the
• historic integrity of these small buildings.
• Ms. Charlene Orr
j' Preservation Officer
• City of Mesquite
= P.O. Box 850137
Mesquite, TX 75 1 85-0 1 37
972 216-6468
• i ` Residence 4,000 sf
Barn 5,760 sf
Range house 1,950 sf
Residence $410,000
1l(1y F~" v{ g a&~+~d f.' } ` `«r Barn exterior $120,000
Range house $ tbd
2000-present
. 4-
f
•
•
Fair Park Projects
Dallas, Texas
Projects at Fair Park began with a 1997 mas-
ter plan for the Esplanade and range from full
building restoration at the Centennial Build-
ing to the reconstruction of missing pylon
and sculpture bases. Other projects included
S the Automobile Building„ the conservation
• Vl~j€" >r - of historic art that includes murals and sculp-
F1 J.- 4; ture, the re-creation of missing art, historic
y kt' finishes analysis for nearly all the buildings in
"VA the park, consulting services for the Com-
prehensive Development Plan (by Har-
• `ice greaves & Associates), and a substantial re-
writing of the local Historic District Ordi-
nance. Ms. McCoy served these projects as
Principal and/or Project Manager/Architect
for ARCHITEXAS. QMc is currently working
• on Fair Park projects that include the reno-
vation of the Cotton Bowl (with Heery In-
ternational).
• ,.tit ° a r
-J. Ms. Louise Elam
• DLO Park and Recreation Department
City of Dallas
1500 Marilla, Room 6FS
• ~ Dallas, TX 75201
214 670-5275
r~yf;",~~+ Y ! ; s 17 projects completed to date
Approximately $20 million, without
• the Cotton Bowl Renovation
• 1997-present
t k T .
• d. ~'S/~eiij S:
• National Trust Honor Award
• Preservation Achievement Awards,
• Preservation Dallas (3)
Restoration Award, Preservation
Texas, (3)
CERTIFICATION
The undersigned affirms that they are duly authorized to execute this contract, that this SOQ has
• not been prepared in collusion with any other firm, and that the contents of this SOQ have not
• been communicated to any other firm prior to the official opening of this SOQ. Additionally, the
undersigned affirms that the firm is willing to sign the enclosed Standard Form of Agreement (if
applicable).
Signed By: Title: Principal
Typed Name: Nancy McCoy Company Name: Quimby McCoy Preservation Architecture LLP
Phone No.: 214 977-9118 Fax No.: 214 977-9119
• Email: nancykquimbymccoy.com
Bid Address: 3200 Main St. #3.6 Dallas TX 75226
P.O. Box or Street City State Zip
• Order Address: same
P.O. Box or Street City State Zip
Remit Address: same
• P.O. Box or Street City State Zip
Federal Tax ID No.: 72-1567613
• Date: January 16, 2007
END OF RFQ #07-39
•
•
CONFLICT OF INTEREST QUESTIONNAIRE FORM CIQ
• For vendor or other person doing business with local governmental entity
• OFFICE USE ONLY
• This questionnaire is being filed in accordance with chapter 176 of the Local
Government Code by a person doing business with the governmental entity. Date Received
•
By law this questionnaire must be filed with the records administrator of the
• local government not later than the 7th business day after the date the person
becomes aware of facts that require the statement to be filed. See Section
• 176.006, Local Government Code.
•
A person committs an offense if the person violates Section 176.006, Local
• Government Code. An offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor.
1. Name of person doing business with local governmental entity.
•
• 1~ ~r IIrG''~ /V~ ~G ~'C
2.
• Check this box if you are filing an update to a previously filed questionnaire.
F
•
• (The law requires that you file an updated completed questionnaire with the appropriate filing authority not later than
September 1 of the year for which an activity described in Section 176.006(a), Local Government Code, is pending and
not later than the 7th business day after the date the originally filed questionnaire becomes incomplete or inaccurate.)
•
• 3. Describe each affiliation or business relationship with an employee or contractor of the local
governmental entity who makes recommendations to a local government officer of the local governmental
entity with respect to expenditure of money.
• ❑ Glenn Brown, City Manager ❑ Terry Childers, Deputy City Mgr ❑ Kathy Merrill, Asst. City Mgr.
• ❑ Robert Alley, Fire Chief ❑ Steve Beachy, Parks & Rec ❑ Olivia Burnside, Inf. Tech.
•
• ❑ Pete Caler, Landfill Mgr. ❑ Harvey Cargill, City Attorney ❑ Michael Clancey, Police Chief
• ❑ David Gwin, Economic Dev. ❑ Connie Hooks, City Secretary ❑ Jeff Kersten, Chief Fin.Officer
❑ David Massey, Electric ❑ Becky Nugent, Public Relations ❑ Julie O'Connell, Human Resources
❑ Lance Simms, Planning & Dev ❑ Mark Smith, Public Works ❑ Ed Spillane, Municipal Judge
• ❑ Cheryl Turney, Purchasing Mgr. ❑ John Woody, W/W W NONE
•
• Describe each affiliation or business relationship with an employee checked in Question 3 above:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• 4. Describe each affiliation or business relationship with a person who is a local government officer and
• who appoints or employs a local government officer of the local government entity that is the subject of
this questionnaire.
• City of College Station Elected Officials
•
• College Station City Council
•
❑ Ron Silvia, Mayor ❑ Ben White, Place 1 ❑ John Happ, Place 2
❑ Ron Gay, Place 3 ❑ Lynn McIlhaney, Place 4 ❑ Chris Scotti, Place 5
• ❑ David Ruesink, Place 6 C?NONE
• City of College Station Committees, Boards, and Commissions
•
• B/CS Library Committee
• ❑ Larry Ringer, Chairman ❑ Katherine Edwards ❑ Don Scherr
• ❑ Mary Fran Troy ❑ Jeanne Mitchell ❑ B. Carroll Johnson
• ❑ Jennifer Bohac ❑ James Bradford fa NONE
•
•
Cemetery Committee
• ❑ Sarah Adams, Chair ❑ Virginia Reese ❑ Kevin Myers
•
• ❑ James Batenhorst ❑ Weldon Kruger ❑ Joe Wallace
❑ David Chester ❑ RC Slocum ❑ James Matson
• ❑ Donald Braune C)iONE
•
• Construction Board of
• Adjustments and
• Appeals/Building & Standards
• Commission
• ❑ Dan B. Sears, Chairman ❑ Frank Cox ❑ David Hart
❑ Mike Lane ❑ Larry D. Patton ❑ Charles Thomas, alternate
• ❑ Steve Parker, alternate ❑ Glenn Thomas, alternate ❑ Quinn Williams
• XNONE
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Historic Preservation Committee
. ❑ Hillary Jessup, Chairman ❑ Bill Lancaster ❑ Marguerite Anthony
❑ Haskell Monroe ❑ Jane Hughey ❑ Meredith Waller
❑ Ernie Wright ❑ Neal Nutall, Jr. ❑ Colleen Risinger
NONE
Joint Relief Funding Review
Committee
. ❑ Rebecca Eplen ❑ J. Kevin Byrne ❑ Deborah Deitering
❑ Rusleen Maurice ❑ Charlotte Mikulee ❑ Peggy Samson
NONE
Parks and Recreation Board
i ❑ Jodi Warner, Chair ❑ Kathleen Ireland ❑ Joan Perry
❑ Shawn Rhodes ❑ Jody Ford ❑ Gary Thomas
❑ John Crompton ❑ Harry Green ❑ Gary Erwin
;KNONE
Planning and Zoning
Commission
❑ John Nichols, Chair ❑ 'Glenn Schroeder ❑ Derek Dictson
• ❑ Marsha Sanford ❑ Dennis Christiansen ❑ Bill Davis
• ❑ Harold Strong NONE
Design Review Board
❑ Rick Heany ❑ Hunter Goodwin ❑ Nancy Sawtelle
• ❑ Alan King ❑ Ward Wells ❑ John Nichols
• ❑ Susie Cox, alternate ❑ Robert Rayburn, alternate Pk.VONE
Zoning Board of Adjustments
❑ Jay Goss, Chair ❑ Joshua Berm ❑ John Richards
• ❑ Denise Whisenant ❑ Donald Braune ❑ Thomas Mather
• .NONE
• Research Valley Partnership
S Board of Directors
• ❑ Larry Hodges ❑ Larry Mariott ❑ Chris Scotti, Councilman
❑ Glenn Brown, City Manager G~,/NONE
Wolf Pen Creek TIF Board
• ❑ Sharon Colson, Chair ❑ Marsha Sanford, Vice Chair ❑ Marc Chaloupka
❑ Kenny Mallard ❑ James Massey NONE
Outside Agency Funding Review
• ❑ Don Lewis ❑ Charles Taylor ❑ Roger Reese
• ❑ Gregg Baird ❑ Sheryl Welford ❑ Carolyn Berrow
❑ Chad Jones KNONE
Northgate Tax Increment
Finance Board
❑ Stephen Syptak, Chair ❑ David Scarmardo ❑ Anne Jackson
❑ Tom Kirkland ❑ Glenn Thomas ❑ Dale O'Riley
Y NONE
Comprehensive Plan Committee
❑ Hugh Lindsay, Area I ❑ John Richards, Area I ❑ David Hart, Alternate, Area I
❑ John Crompton, Area II ❑ Brian Bochner, Area 11 ❑ Dennis Corrington, Alternate, Area 11
i ❑ Steve Arden, Area III ❑ Laurie Corbelli, Area III ❑ Tom Taylor, Alternate, Area III
❑ Hugh Stearns, Area IV ❑ Jerry Cooper, Area IV ❑ Adrian Williams, Alternate, Area IV
• ❑ Andrew Burleson, Student Resident ❑ Kristina Campbell, Alternate, ❑ Douglas Rape', ETJ Resident
Student Resident
❑ Dorthea Robinson, Alternate, ❑ Craig Hall, Resident-At-Large ❑ Mike Guido, Alternate,
ETJ Resident Resident-At-Large
❑ Chris Scotti, Councilmember ❑ Lynn McIlhaney, Alternate, ❑ Bill Davis, P&Z
Councilmember
❑ Hillary Jessup, Historic ❑ Gary Erwin, Parks & Rec ❑ Kathleen Ireland, Parks & Rec
Preservation Alternate
❑ Lloyd Wasserman, County ❑ Larry Haskins, Northgate ❑ Bo Miles, Building & Land
• Commission District Assoc. Development
•
•
• ❑ Larry Marriott, Home Builders ❑ Linda LaSut, Intergovernmental ❑ Chad Bohne, Intergovernmental
• Assoc. Comm/MPO Comm/TxDOT
• ❑ Tedi Ellison, Intergovernmental ❑ Lindsey Guindi, Intergovernmental ❑ Michael Parks, Intergovernmental
• Comm/Chamber of Commerce Comm/Chamber of Commerce Comm/B VCOG
• ❑ James Massey, Intergovernmental ❑ Rodney Weis, Intergovernmental ❑ Gary Arnold, Intergovernmental
• Comm/TAMU Admin Comm/TAMU Transit Comm/Brazos County Sheriff
• ❑ Dr. Clark Ealy, Intergovernmental ❑ Dr. Colleen Netterville, ❑ Gary Teston, Intergovernmental
Comm/CSISD Intergovernmental Comm/BISD Comm/ Easterwood Airport
•
• ❑ Chuck Martinez, ❑ Margie Lucas, NONE
Intergovernmental Comm/ Intergovernmental Comm/
• Research Valley Patnership Brazos Transit District
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
i
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
s
Joint City/School
Intergovernmental Committee
•
❑ Dave Ruesink ❑ Ben White ❑ John Happ
l NONE
•
Sister Cities Association
• ❑ Dave Ruesink .NONE
•
s
Transportation Committee
•
• ❑ Ron Gay ❑ John Happ ❑ Lynn McIlhaney
• ❑ Ken Fogle ❑ Linda LaSuit, MPO ❑ Dennis Christianson, TTI
❑ Michael Parker, BVCOG Bryan Woods, TxDOT R NONE
•
Wolf Pen Creek Oversight
Committee
❑ Ron Gay ❑ Chris Scotti HONE
s
s
Describe each affiliation or business
s relationship with an employee checked in
Question 4 above:
s
•
•
•
•
s
s
•
Adopted 01/13/06
•
•
•
•
's
•
•
•
•
•
The following individuals are appointed by the City Council to represent the City of College Station on
• joint committees with other governmental agencies and community groups.
Brazos County Health
Department
❑ Lynn McIlhaney ❑ Ben White [.NONE
• Brazos Valley Council of
Governments
i
S ❑ Ron Silvia, Mayor C NONE
B/CS Metropolitan Planning
Organization
❑ Ron Silvia, Mayor NONE
BVCOG TMPA Regional Park
Project Advisory Board
• ❑ Lynn McIlhaney NONE
BVSWMA Policy Advisory
• Board
❑ Ron Silvia, Mayor 0 Chris Scotti V-,NONE
City Center Committee
❑ Ron Silvia ❑ Ben White ❑ Dave Ruesink
•
• NONE
Intergovernmental Committee
. ❑ Ron Gay ❑ Ben White ❑ John Happ
KNONE
•
•
CONFLICT OF INTEREST QUESTIONNAIRE FORM CIQ
• For vendor or other person doing business with local governmental entity
This section. item 5 including subparts A, B, C & D, must be completed for each officer with whom the filer
• has affiliation or other relationship. Attach additional pages to this Form CIQ as necessary.
• 5. Name of local government officer with whom filer has affiliation or business relationship. (Complete
this section only if the answer to A, B, or C is YES.
•
•
A. Is the local government officer named in this section receiving or likely to receive taxable income from the
. filer of the questionnaire?
❑ Yes ❑ No
•
•
. B. Is the filer of the questionnaire receiving or likely to receive taxable income from or at the direction of the
local government officer named in this section AND the taxable income is not from the local governmental
• entity?
• ❑ Yes ❑ No
•
•
• C. Is the filer of this questionnaire affiliated with a corporation or other business entity that the local
S government officer serves as an officer or director, or holds an ownership of 10 percent or more?
• ❑ Yes ❑ No
•
D. Describe each affiliation or business relationship.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
6.
•
AA at:jL~=, •
• el• O - 0'L
. Signature of doing business with overnmental entity Date
•
•
• Adopted 01 / 13/06
•
•
•
CONFLICT OF INTEREST QUESTIONNAIRE FORM CIQ
• For vendor or other person doing business with local governmental entity
OFFICE USE ONLY
• This questionnaire is being filed in accordance with chapter 176 of the Local
• Government Code by a person doing business with the governmental entity. Date Received
By law this questionnaire must be filed with the records administrator of the
• local government not later than the 7th business day after the date the person
. becomes aware of facts that require the statement to be filed. See Section
176.006, Local Government Code.
• A person committs an offense if the person violates Section 176.006, Local
Government Code. An offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor.
1. Name of person doing business Uh local governmental entity.
2.
Check this box if you are filing an update to a previously filed questionnaire.
• (The law requires that you file an updated completed questionnaire with the appropriate filing authority not later than
• September 1 of the year for which an activity described in Section 176.006(a), Local Government Code, is pending and
not later than the 7th business day after the date the originally filed questionnaire becomes incomplete or inaccurate.)
3. Describe each affiliation or business relationship with an employee or contractor of the local
• governmental entity who makes recommendations to a local government officer of the local governmental
entity with respect to expenditure of money.
❑ Glenn Brown, City Manager ❑ Terry Childers, Deputy City Mgr ❑ Kathy Merrill, Asst. City Mgr.
❑ Robert Alley, Fire Chief ❑ Steve Beachy, Parks & Rec ❑ Olivia Burnside, Inf. Tech.
• ❑ Pete Caler, Landfill Mgr. ❑ Harvey Cargill, City Attorney ❑ Michael Clancey, Police Chief
• ❑ David Gwin, Economic Dev. ❑ Connie Hooks, City Secretary ❑ Jeff Kersten, Chief Fin.Officer
' ❑ David Massey, Electric ❑ Becky Nugent, Public Relations ❑ Julie O'Connell, Human Resources
. ❑ Lance Simms, Planning & Dev ❑ Mark Smith, Public Works ❑ Ed Spillane, Municipal Judge
❑ Cheryl Turney, Purchasing Mgr. ❑ John Woody, WIW W 4ONE
Describe each affiliation or business relationship with an employee checked in Question 3 above:
• 4. Describe each affiliation or business relationship with a person who is a local government officer and
who appoints or employs a local government officer of the local government entity that is the subject of
this questionnaire.
• City of College Station Elected Officials
College Station City Council
. ❑ Ron Silvia, Mayor ❑ Ben White, Place 1 ❑ John Happ, Place 2
❑ Ron Gay, Place 3 ❑ Lynn McIlhaney, Place 4 ❑ Chris Scotti, Place 5
❑ David Ruesink, Place 6 NONE
• City of College Station Committees, Boards, and Commissions
B/CS Library Committee
❑ Larry Ringer, Chairman ❑ Katherine Edwards ❑ Don Scherr
• ❑ Mary Fran Troy ❑ Jeanne Mitchell ❑ B. Carroll Johnson
• ❑ Jennifer Bohac ❑ James Bradford [NONE
Cemetery Committee
• ❑ Sarah Adams, Chair ❑ Virginia Reese ❑ Kevin Myers
• ❑ James Batenhorst ❑ Weldon Kruger ❑ Joe Wallace
❑ David Chester ❑ RC Slocum ❑ James Matson
• ❑ Donald Braune7 NONE
Construction Board of
Adjustments and
• Appeals/Building & Standards
Commission
❑ Dan B. Sears, Chairman ❑ Frank Cox ❑ David Hart
❑ Mike Lane ❑ Larry D. Patton ❑ Charles Thomas, alternate
❑ Steve Parker, alternate ❑ Glenn Thomas, alternate ❑ Quinn Williams
WONE
• Historic Preservation Committee
. ❑ Hillary Jessup, Chairman ❑ Bill Lancaster ❑ Marguerite Anthony
❑ Haskell Monroe ❑ Jane Hughey ❑ Meredith Waller
❑ Ernie Wright ❑ Neal Nutall, Jr. ❑ Colleen Risinger
~ C~NONE
• Joint Relief Funding Review
Committee
• ❑ Rebecca Eplen ❑ J. Kevin Byrne ❑ Deborah Deitering
❑ Rusleen Maurice ❑ Charlotte Mikulee ❑ Peggy Samson
NONE
Parks and Recreation Board
❑ Jodi Warner, Chair ❑ Kathleen Ireland ❑ Joan Perry
❑ Shawn Rhodes ❑ Jody Ford ❑ Gary Thomas
❑ John Crompton ❑ Harry Green ❑ Gary Erwin
NONE
Planning and Zoning
Commission
❑ John Nichols, Chair ❑ Glenn Schroeder ❑ Derek Dictson
❑ Marsha Sanford ❑ Dennis Christiansen ❑ Bill Davis
❑ Harold Strong CPONE
• Design Review Board
❑ Rick Hearty ❑ Hunter Goodwin ❑ Nancy Sawtelle
❑ Alan King ❑ Ward Wells ❑ John Nichols
• ❑ Susie Cox, alternate ❑ Robert Rayburn, alternate ILO NONE
• Zoning Board of Adjustments
❑ Jay Goss, Chair ❑ Joshua Benn ❑ John Richards
❑ Denise Whisenant ❑ Donald Braune ❑ Thomas Mather
5qWNE
V-
• Research Valley Partnership
Board of Directors
• ❑ Larry Hodges ❑ Larry Mariott ❑ Chris Scotti, Councilman
❑ Glenn Brown, City Manager fR NONE
Wolf Pen Creek TIF Board
• ❑ Sharon Colson, Chair ❑ Marsha Sanford, Vice Chair ❑ Marc Chaloupka
• ❑ Kenny Mallard ❑ James Massey lk NONE
Outside Agency Funding Review
• ❑ Don Lewis ❑ Charles Taylor ❑ Roger Reese
• ❑ Gregg Baird ❑ Sheryl Welford ❑ Carolyn Berrow
❑ Chad Jones WONE
Northgate Tax Increment
• Finance Board
❑ Stephen Syptak, Chair ❑ David Scarmardo ❑ Anne Jackson
❑ Tom Kirkland ❑ Glenn Thomas ❑ Dale O'Riley
NONE
Comprehensive Plan Committee
❑ Hugh Lindsay, Area I ❑ John Richards, Area I ❑ David Hart, Alternate, Area I
❑ John Crompton, Area II ❑ Brian Bochner, Area II ❑ Dennis Corrington, Alternate, Area II
❑ Steve Arden, Area III ❑ Laurie Corbelli, Area III ❑ Tom Taylor, Alternate, Area III
❑ Hugh Stearns, Area IV ❑ Jerry Cooper, Area IV ❑ Adrian Williams, Alternate, Area IV
❑ Andrew Burleson, Student Resident ❑ Kristina Campbell, Altemate, ❑ Douglas Rape', ETJ Resident
Student Resident
❑ Dorthea Robinson, Alternate, ❑ Craig Hall, Resident-At-Large ❑ Mike Guido, Alternate,
ETJ Resident Resident-At-Large
❑ Chris Scotti, Councilmember ❑ Lynn McIlhaney, Alternate, ❑ Bill Davis, P&Z
• Councilmember
• ❑ Hillary Jessup, Historic ❑ Gary Erwin, Parks & Rec ❑ Kathleen Ireland, Parks & Rec
. Preservation Alternate
• ❑ Lloyd Wasserman, County ❑ Larry Haskins, Northgate ❑ Bo Miles, Building & Land
• Commission District Assoc. Development
❑ Larry Marriott, Home Builders ❑ Linda LaSut, Intergovernmental ❑ Chad Bohne, Intergovernmental
Assoc. Comm/MPO Comm/TxDOT
❑ Tedi Ellison, Intergovernmental ❑ Lindsey Guindi, Intergovernmental ❑ Michael Parks, Intergovernmental
• Comm/Chamber of Commerce Comm/Chamber of Commerce Comm/BVCOG
❑ James Massey, Intergovernmental ❑ Rodney Weis, Intergovernmental ❑ Gary Arnold, Intergovernmental
• Comm/TAMU Admin COmm/TAMU Transit Comm/Brazos County Sheriff
• ❑ Dr. Clark Ealy, Intergovemmental ❑ Dr. Colleen Netterville, ❑ Gary Teston, Intergovernmental
. Comm/CSISD Intergovernmental CommBISD Comm/ Easterwood Airport
❑ Chuck Martinez, ❑ Margie Lucas, ONE
Intergovernmental Comm/ Intergovernmental Comm/
Research Valley Patnership Brazos Transit District
• The following individuals are appointed by the City Council to represent the City of College Station on
. joint committees with other governmental agencies and community groups.
Brazos County Health
• Department
❑ Lynn McIlhaney ❑ Ben White fANONE
• Brazos Valley Council of
Governments
. ❑ Ron Silvia, Mayor V NONE
B/CS Metropolitan Planning
Organization
• ❑ Ron Silvia, Mayor P NONE
BVCOG TMPA Regional Park
• Project Advisory Board
• ❑ Lynn McIlhaney A NONE
BVSWMA Policy Advisory
• Board
• ❑ Ron Silvia, Mayor ❑ Chris Scotti NONE
• City Center Committee
❑ Ron Silvia ❑ Ben White ❑ Dave Ruesink
ONE
Intergovernmental Committee
• ❑ Ron Gay ❑ Ben White ❑ John Happ
• O NONE
• Joint City/School
. Intergovernmental Committee
❑ Dave Ruesink ❑ Ben White ❑ John Happ
• NONE
Sister Cities Association
• ❑ Dave Ruesink %,NONE
Transportation Committee
. ❑ Ron Gay ❑ John Happ ❑ Lynn McIlhaney
❑ Ken Fogle ❑ Linda LaSuit, MPO ❑ Dennis Christianson, TTI
❑ Michael Parker, BVCOG ❑ Bryan Woods, TxDOT ANONE
Wolf Pen Creek Oversight
Committee
❑ Ron Gay ❑ Chris Scotti EXNONE
• Describe each affiliation or business relationship with an employee checked in Question 4 above:
Adopted 01/13/06
CONFLICT OF INTEREST QUESTIONNAIRE FORM CIQ
• For vendor or other person doing business with local governmental entity
This section, item 5 including subparts A, B, C & D, must be completed for each officer with whom the filer
has affiliation or other relationship. Attach additional pages to this Form CIQ as necessary.
5. Name of local government officer with whom filer has affiliation or business relationship. (Complete
this section only if the answer to A, B, or C is YES.
A. Is the local government officer named in this section receiving or likely to receive taxable income from the
• filer of the questionnaire?
F-1 Yes F-1 No
• B. Is the filer of the questionnaire receiving or likely to receive taxable income from or at the direction of the
local government officer named in this section AND the taxable income is not from the local governmental
entity?
• F-1 Yes ❑ No
. C. Is the filer of this questionnaire affiliated with a corporation or other business entity that the local
• government officer serves as an officer or director, or holds an ownership of 10 percent or more?
❑ Yes ❑ No
D. Describe each affiliation or business relationship.
6.
• d/. Mb are
-to-INA Oft-1-010-0,40e
• Signature of person doing business with the governmental entity Date
• Adopted 01/13/06