The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About09/05/2024 - Regular Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning Commission College Station, TX Meeting Agenda Planning and Zoning Commission 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, TX 77840 Internet: www.microsoft.com/microsoft-teams/join-a-meeting Meeting ID: 279 783 445 779 | Passcode: RtFGtJ Phone: 833-240-7855 | Phone Conference ID: 291 547 031# The City Council may or may not attend this meeting. September 5, 2024 6:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers College Station, TX Page 1 Notice is hereby given that a quorum of the meeting body will be present in the physical location stated above where citizens may also attend in order to view a member(s) participating by videoconference call as allowed by 551.127, Texas Government Code. The City uses a third- party vendor to host the virtual portion of the meeting; if virtual access is unavailable, meeting access and participation will be in-person only. 1. Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request. 2. Hear Visitors At this time, the Chairperson will open the floor to visitors wishing to address the Commission on issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The visitor presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.) 3. Consent Agenda All matters listed under the Consent Agenda, are considered routine by the Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include preliminary plans and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. Since there will not be separate discussion of these items, citizens wishing to address the Commission regarding one or more items on the Consent Agenda may address the Commission at this time as well. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it may be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration. 3.1. Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes. Attachments: 1. August 15 2024 4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. 5. Regular Agenda 5.1. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from M-1 Light Industrial to CI Commercial Industrial on approximately Page 1 of 223 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 2 September 5, 2024 11 acres located in the University Industrial Center, more generally located at 151 Graham Road. Case #REZ2024-000016 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 26, 2024 City Council Meeting – Subject to change). Sponsors: Robin Macias Attachments: 1. Aerial and Small Area Map 2. Background Information 3. Existing Future Land Use Map 4. Rezoning Map 5. Applicant's Supporting Information 6. Rezoning Exhibit 5.2. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding waiver requests to the Unified Development Ordinance Section 8.3.G.2 ‘Blocks’ and presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding a Preliminary Plan for Southern Pointe Subdivision on approximately 553 acres of land, generally located north of Peach Creek Cut-Off Road and east of State Highway 6 in the City’s Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). Case #PP2024-000008. Sponsors: Jesse Dimeolo Attachments: 1. Staff Report 2. Waiver Request 3. Block Length Waiver Exhibit 4. Applicant's Supporting Information 5. Aerial 6. Preliminary Plan 5.3. Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding ordinance amending the College Station Comprehensive Plan by adopting a new Housing Action Plan. Sponsors: David Brower Attachments: 1. Housing Action Plan 6. Informational Agenda 6.1. Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev 6.2. Presentation and discussion regarding an update on items heard: • A rezoning of approximately 32 acres being 130 lots and common area within Woodcreek Section One Subdivision to establish a ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August 1, 2024 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on August 22, 2024 and voted (5-1) to approve the request. • A rezoning of approximately 28 acres being the majority of the properties which front Richards Street, Crest Street, and Sterling Street from GS General Suburban to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August 1, 2024 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on August 22, 2024 and voted (7-0) to approve the request. • A rezoning of approximately 3.66 acres generally bounded by Lincoln Avenue, Nimitz Street, and Eisenhower Street from GS General Suburban to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on August 1, 2024 and voted (6-0) to recommend approval with the condition on the construction of Page 2 of 223 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 3 September 5, 2024 an approved access drive or turnaround. The City Council heard this item on August 22, 2024 and voted (7-0) to approve the request with the condition. 6.3. Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: • Thursday, September 12, 2024 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, September 19, 2024 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, September 26, 2024 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, October 3, 2024 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m. 6.4. Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board and BioCorridor Board. • None 7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items. A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 8. Adjourn. The Planning and Zoning Commission may adjourn into Executive Session to consider any item listed on the agenda if a matter is raised that is appropriate for Executive Session discussion. I certify that the above Notice of Meeting was posted on the website and at College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas, on August 30, 2024 at 5:00 p.m. City Secretary This building is wheelchair accessible. Persons with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services such as interpreters, readers, or large print are asked to contact the City Secretary’s Office at (979) 764-3541, TDD at 1-800-735-2989, or email adaassistance@cstx.gov at least two business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made. If the City does not receive notification at least two business days prior to the meeting, the City will make a reasonable attempt to provide the necessary accommodations. Penal Code § 30.07. Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun. "Pursuant to Section 30.07, Penal Code (Trespass by License Holder with an Openly Carried Handgun) A Person Licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code (Handgun Licensing Law), may not enter this Property with a Handgun that is Carried Openly." Codigo Penal § 30.07. Traspasar Portando Armas de Mano al Aire Libre con Licencia. Page 3 of 223 Planning and Zoning Commission Page 4 September 5, 2024 “Conforme a la Seccion 30.07 del codigo penal (traspasar portando armas de mano al aire libre con licencia), personas con licencia bajo del Sub-Capitulo H, Capitulo 411, Codigo de Gobierno (Ley de licencias de arma de mano), no deben entrar a esta propiedad portando arma de mano al aire libre.” Page 4 of 223 August 15, 2024 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 7 Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting August 15, 2024 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairperson Melissa McIlhaney, Commissioners Jason Cornelius, Bobby Mirza, Marcus Chaloupka, Aron Collins, and Scott Shafer COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Commissioner Warren Finch COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Dennis Maloney, William Wright, and Mark Smith CITY STAFF PRESENT: Director of Planning & Development Services Anthony Armstrong, Transportation Planning Coordinator Jason Schubert, Development Review Administrator Robin Macias, Long Range Planning Administrator Christine Leal, Principal Planner Heather Wade, Senior Planners Jeff Howell and Jesse DiMeolo, Staff Planner Ashley Klein, Engineer II Lucas Harper, Assistant City Attorney II Aaron Longoria, Administrative Support Specialist Kristen Hejny, and Technology Services Specialist Joel Lopez 1. Call Meeting to Order, Pledge of Allegiance, Consider Absence Request. Chairperson McIlhaney called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 2. Hear Visitors No visitors spoke. 3. Consent Agenda 3.1 Consideration, discussion, and possible action to approve meeting minutes. • August 1, 2024 Commissioner Cornelius moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Commissioner Chaloupka seconded the motion, the motion passed 6-0. 4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission Action. No items were removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. 5. Regular Agenda 5.1 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Page 5 of 223 August 15, 2024 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 7 Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by changing the zoning district boundaries from GS General Suburban or PDD Planned Development District to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay or MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay and NAP Natural Areas Protected for approximately 18.66 acres being all of that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the J.E. Scott league, abstract no. 50 and Crawford Burnett league, abstract no. 7, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, including portions of the F.S. Kapchinski Subdivision as described by a plat reconstructed from deed records recorded in volume Y, page 618-A of the Mechanics & Materialman's Lien Records of Brazos County, Texas, and subsequent replats of portions of it, generally for the properties located along Park Place and Boardwalk Court. Case #REZ2023-000029 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 12, 2024 City Council meeting – Subject to change). 5.2 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4 “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, by changing the zoning district boundaries from GS General Suburban or D Duplex to MH Middle Housing and HOO High Occupancy Overlay for approximately 1.10 acres being all of that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Richard Carter league, abstract no. 8, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being a portion of Lot 12 of the D.A. Smith Subdivision as described by plat recorded in volume 49, page 106 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and the northeast half (approximate) of the adjoining right-of-way of Turner Street, generally for the properties located along Gilbert Street and Turner Street. Case #REZ2023-000060 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 12, 2024 City Council meeting – Subject to change). Presentations for agenda items #5.1 and #5.2 were held together. Senior Planner Howell presented agenda items #5.1 and #5.2 to the Commission recommending approval of both. Chairperson McIlhaney asked for confirmation that both areas have been reviewed by the Commission previously for MH Middle Housing but were not considered previously because they needed to be surveyed. Senior Planner Howell confirmed that both areas have received surveying and additional public feedback prior to going forward with the rezoning. Commissioner Cornelius asked if staff received any additional feedback from the public for these areas. Senior Planner Howell stated that staff has received general positive feedback and feedback regarding parking in area K, agenda item #5.1. Page 6 of 223 August 15, 2024 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 7 Commissioner Mirza asked for the effect of the Mechanics & Materialman's Lien as stated in the legal description for agenda item #5.1. Senior Planner Howell clarified that this legal description was generated from the surveyor. Chairperson McIlhaney opened the public hearing for agenda item #5.1. No visitors spoke. Chairperson McIlhaney closed the public hearing for agenda item #5.1. Chairperson McIlhaney opened the public hearing for agenda item #5.2. No visitors spoke. Chairperson McIlhaney closed the public hearing for agenda item #5.2. Commissioner Cornelius moved to recommend approval of agenda item #5.1, Commissioner Chaloupka seconded the motion, the motion passed 6-0. Commissioner Cornelius moved to recommend approval of agenda item #5.2, Commissioner Chaloupka seconded the motion, the motion passed 6-0. 5.3 Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan by amending the Thoroughfare Plan and Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Greenways Master Plan to remove the future extension of Balcones Drive, a Minor Collector, between the Jones Crossing Development and Welsh Avenue including associated future bike lanes and sidewalks. Case #CPA2024-000002 (Final action of this item is scheduled for the September 12, 2024 City Council Meeting – Subject to change). Coordinator Schubert presented the item to the Commission recommending denial of the request. Veronica Morgan, Applicant, Mitchell & Morgan Engineers, was available to present to and answer questions from the Commission. Chessie Zimmerman, Developer, Stratus Properties, was available to present to and answer questions from the Commission. Commissioner Cornelius asked if staff has information contradictory to the applicant’s recent traffic impact analysis (TIA). Coordinator Schubert confirmed that staff has not been provided with the applicant’s recent TIA, so it is unclear if the TIA meets the requirements. Mr. Schubert also stated that it is important to know that a TIA provides a snapshot in time, showing that the analysis is good through 2027, a long-term analysis would be performed via a Traffic Demand Model as Page 7 of 223 August 15, 2024 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 7 stated in the staff report, the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) found that the results are inconclusive. Commissioner Cornelius asked if it is of the City’s opinion that this minor collector is a necessity. Coordinator Schubert stated that the City has the opportunity to make a connection, it is a safer connection, creates redundancy, and would provide relief and alternate route within the area. Commissioner Cornelius asked if connections from Metalmark Way and Waxwing Lane to FM 2818 would affect any connections. Coordinator Schubert stated that the developers are making connections via The Deason’s site plan which included a platting block length connection from Metalmark Way and Waxwing Lane. Commissioner Collins stated that one of the applicant’s justifications for this request was a change in conditions, stating that they now know the land use constituting a change in conditions, asking if staff considered this a change in conditions necessary to hear and review an amendment. Coordinator Schubert stated that there is more certainty in the land use outcome, however the Comprehensive Plan has this area as a general commercial multi-family use, the land use types for this area have not changed. Commissioner Shafer asked how the road would be built if the City does not put the construction on a bond election or bond consideration. Coordinator Schubert stated that the thoroughfare widening was put on an internal list for consideration, this is a minor collector connection, major or existing roads needing attention and repair were prioritized on the internal list. Director Armstrong clarified that the City has other opportunities to finance roadway projects. Commissioner Shafer asked for further clarification on why this project was not financed by different means. Director Armstrong stated that project funding would be at the will of the City Council to prioritize. Commissioner Mirza commented that a walkway would be convenient in this area. Page 8 of 223 August 15, 2024 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 7 Commissioner Cornelius asked if all parties were aware of this extension during the lifetime of the development. Coordinator Schubert confirmed that this extension was adopted into the Thoroughfare Plan in 2009. Commissioner Cornelius asked for clarification that the Normand Drive extension was completed through the developer. Coordinator Schubert confirmed that allocated funds were given to developer to construct the Normand Drive extension. Commissioner Chaloupka confirmed that this extension has been laid out since the beginning of the Jones Crossing development process. Chairperson McIlhaney asked if staff is aware of any health and safety issues having two prongs of a street with an empty space in the middle. Coordinator Schubert stated that if this connection is removed, the Wellborn Road side of Balcones Drive should be renamed for emergency purposes. If removed from the Thoroughfare Plan, then one question would be if it should be considered a public street, staff has not discussed this option. Chairperson McIlhaney asked if the developer was given the option to put up a bond versus cash, and why the developer chose to provide cash. Ms. Zimmerman stated that the issue between putting up a bond versus cash is that the bond would need to be renewed each year, and the City did not want to rely on the developer to renew the bond each year. Chairperson McIlhaney opened the public hearing. Troy Allen, Pastor First Baptist Church, College Station, spoke in favor of removing the connection citing concerns with church expansion projects rendering part of property unusable, and stating that there are adequate alternate routes available. Chairperson McIlhaney closed the public hearing. Commissioner Collins clarified that all parties were involved from beginning, there is no significant change in condition or compatibility in the area. Commissioner Chaloupka stated that having alternate routes are a necessity for future growth. Commissioner Cornelius stated that there is a need for the connection as the development grows. Page 9 of 223 August 15, 2024 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 7 Commissioner Mirza expressed support for the connection allowing access for shoppers in the area. Commissioner Shafer expressed support for the connection stating that connectivity is very important in the community. Commissioner Cornelius moved to recommend denial of the Thoroughfare Plan Amendment request, Commissioner Chaloupka seconded the motion, the motion passed 6-0. 6. Informational Agenda 6.1 Discussion of new development applications submitted to the City. New Development Link: www.cstx.gov/newdev There was no discussion. 6.2 Presentation and discussion regarding an update on items heard: • A rezoning of approximately 117 acres of land being 147 lots within Sweet Briar, College Hills Woodlands, and Woodland Acres Subdivision to establish a ROO Restricted Occupancy Overlay. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard this item on July 18, 2024 and voted (7-0) to recommend approval. The City Council heard this item on August 8, 2024 and voted (6-0) to approve the request. There was no discussion. 6.3 Presentation and discussion regarding the P&Z Calendar of Upcoming Meetings: • Thursday, August 22, 2024 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 6:00 p.m. • Wednesday, August 28, 2024 ~ Joint P&Z Meeting with City of Bryan ~ Bush 4141 Community Room ~ 11:30 a.m. • Thursday, September 5, 2024 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, September 12, 2024 ~ City Council Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ Open Meeting 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, September 19, 2024 ~ P&Z Meeting ~ Council Chambers ~ 6:00 p.m. There was no discussion. 6.4 Discussion and review regarding the following meetings: Design Review Board and BioCorridor Board. Page 10 of 223 August 15, 2024 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 7 • None There was no discussion. 7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items. A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. Commissioner Collins expressed support for the joint City of College Station and City of Bryan Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. 8. Adjourn The meeting adjourned at 7:21 p.m. Approved: Attest: ___________________________________ _________________________________ Melissa McIlhaney, Chairperson Kristen Hejny, Board Secretary Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development Services Page 11 of 223 September 5, 2024 Item No. 5.1. 151 Graham Rd Sponsor: Robin Macias, Land Development Review Administrator Reviewed By CBC: Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion and possible action regarding an ordinance amending Appendix A, Unified Development Ordinance, Article 4, “Zoning Districts,” Section 4.2 “Official Zoning Map,” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas by changing the zoning district boundaries from M-1 Light Industrial to CI Commercial Industrial on approximately 11 acres located in the University Industrial Center, more generally located at 151 Graham Road. Case #REZ2024-000016 (Note: Final action of this item will be considered at the September 26, 2024 City Council Meeting – Subject to change). Relationship to Strategic Goals: • Diverse Growing Economy Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request. Summary: This request is to rezone approximately 11 acres of land located at 151 Graham Rd. from M-1 Light Industrial to CI Commercial Industrial. The property is developed as an industrial complex but is currently vacant. A portion of the property is still undeveloped. The M-1 Light Industrial zoning district was retired in 2003 with the original adoption of the Unified Development Ordinance. This rezoning request would allow for the zoning to be updated to a current zoning district. The intent of the rezoning is to allow for different uses that are not allowed by right within the current zoning of M-1 Light Industrial. REZONING REVIEW CRITERIA 1. Whether the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use and Character Map designates the subject property as Business Center. The Comprehensive Plan generally describes the Business Center land use designation as follows: Areas that include office, research or industrial uses that may be planned and developed as a unified project. These areas need convenient access to arterial roadways. The intent of the district is to: • Accommodate a variety of large footprint buildings • Accommodate commercial and service uses within Business Centers The zoning districts that are generally appropriate within the Business Center land use include: BP Business Park and CI Commercial Industrial The proposed zoning district of CI Commercial Industrial would be in line with the Comprehensive Plan. Page 12 of 223 2. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed zoning district will be appropriate in the context of the surrounding area: The property has frontage to FM 2154 and Graham Road. Adjacent properties are zoned R-4 Multi- family to the north, M-2 Heavy Industrial to the east and SC Suburban Commercial and M-2 Heavy Industrial to the south across Graham Road. The adjacent property to the north is developed as multi-family residential and the properties to the east are developed as commercial office space and a landscaping supply company. The properties across Graham Road are developed as a commercial daycare. The CI Commercial Industrial zoning district is designed to provide a location for outlets offering goods and services to a limited segment of the general public. The allowed uses in this district generally serve other commercial and industrial enterprises. The proposed zoning district is appropriate for the surrounding area as it would allow for a variety of uses which would help serve the surrounding businesses. 3. Whether the property to be rezoned is physically suitable for the proposed zoning district: The size and location of the subject property is suitable for uses allowed within the proposed zoning district. The site has adequate space to meet the minimal dimensional standards for CI Commercial Industrial. There is no floodplain on the property. 4. Whether there is available water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities generally suitable and adequate for uses permitted by the proposed zoning district: The existing water and wastewater infrastructure is adequate to support the needs of this development. Detention is required in accordance with the BCS guidelines. Drainage and any other infrastructure required with the site development shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the BCS Unified Design Guidelines. The subject property has frontage to FM 2154 (Wellborn Road) and Graham Road. FM 2154 is designated as a 6-lane Major Arterial and Graham Road is designated as a 2-lane Major Collector on the City’s Thoroughfare Plan. The property has existing driveway access to FM 2154 and Graham Road. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was done for the rezoning request and studied 6 street intersections in the surrounding area and the 2 site driveways. The TIA identified mitigation is needed at the intersection of Graham Road and Victoria Avenue. If the proposed development generates more than 151 trips in the AM Peak or more than 121 trips in the PM peak then a single- lane roundabout will need to be constructed at that intersection to meet traffic demands. 5. The marketability of the property: The applicant has stated that the current M-1 Light Industrial zoning is not the highest and best use for the property. Rezoning the property from M-1 Light Industrial to CI Commercial Industrial can provide additional development opportunity by allowing a greater variety of uses. The opportunity for an increased variety of uses will make the property more marketable. Page 13 of 223 Budget & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. Aerial and Small Area Map 2. Background Information 3. Existing Future Land Use Map 4. Rezoning Map 5. Applicant's Supporting Information 6. Rezoning Exhibit Page 14 of 223 Page 15 of 223 Page 16 of 223 BACKGROUND INFORMATION NOTIFICATIONS Advertised Commission Hearing Date: September 5, 2024 Advertised Council Hearing Date: September 26, 2024 The following neighborhood organizations that are registered with the City of College Station’s Neighborhood Services have received a courtesy letter of notification of this public hearing: Edelweiss Gartens Edelweiss Estates Property owner notices mailed: 13 Contacts in support: None at the time of this report Contacts in opposition: None at the time of this report Inquiry contacts: None at the time of this report ADJACENT LAND USES Direction Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use North Urban Residential R-4 Mutli-Family Multi-Family Residential South Neighborhood Commercial and Business Center SC Suburban Commercial and M-2 Heavy Industrial Graham Rd (2-lane major collector) East Business Center M-2 Heavy Industrial Commercial Business West Business Center R Rural FM 2154 (6-lane major arterial) DEVELOPMENT HISTORY Annexation: March 1992 Zoning:A-O Agricultural Open (1992) M-1 Planned Industrial (1993) Renamed to M-1 Light Industrial (2003) Final Plat: University Industrial Center Site development:Commercial offices and Undeveloped Page 17 of 223 Page 18 of 223 Page 19 of 223 Name of Project:151 GRAHAM RD (REZ2024-000016) Address:151 GRAHAM RD Legal Description:UNIVERSITY INDUSTRIAL CENTER, LOT 88.1, ACRES 8.2235 Total Acreage:10.837 Applicant:: Property Owner:SIANTAR INVESTMENTS I LP SCHULTZ ENGINEERING List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. The demand for commercial industrial developments remains high, updating the M-1 Light Industrial zoning to CI commercial Industrial will meet the demands for a more variety of uses. Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. The Commercial Industrial zoning will be compatible since the surrounding area includes Heavy Industrial, Commercial Industrial and Suburban Commercial. How will this zone change be compatible with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property and with the character of the neighborhood? The current zoning district is M-1 Light Industrial which is suitable for this property, however this district would be underutilized and would not be used for its highest and best use. Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the rezoning district requested. The utility infrastructure is in place to support the requested zoning and the land characteristics such as vegetation and topography are suitable for the requested zoning. REZONING APPLICATION SUPPORTING INFORMATION Page 1 of 2 Page 20 of 223 Explain the suitability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. The utility infrastructure is in place to support the requested zoning and the land characteristics such as vegetation and topography are suitable for the requested zoning. Explain the marketability of the property for uses permitted by the current zoning district. The current zoning would limit the uses allowed and the marketability of the land. List any other reasons to support this zone change. The zoning request will update this property to a more marketable zoning district that fits well with the surrounding properties. Page 2 of 2 Page 21 of 223 WELLBORN RDGRAHAM RD GRAHAM RD BRANDENBURG LN60' PAVEMENT10.837 AC. Existing Zoning: Light Industrial - M1 Proposed Zoning: Commercial Industrial - CI COCS GPS MON 117 S 8 6 ° 1 8 ' 0 9 " W 4 8 5 9 . 9 1 ' TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840 www (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER: ZONING MAP UNIVERSITY INDUSTRIAL CENTER 10.837 ACRES EXISTING ZONING - LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, M1 PROPOSED ZONING - COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL, CI COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS SURVEYOR: Adam Wallace, RPLS No. 6132 ATM Surveying P.O. Box 10313 College Station, TX 77840 (979) 209-9291 SCALE: 1"=50' AUGUST 2024 OWNER/DEVELOPER: SIANTAR INVESTMENTS LLC 727 Graham Road College Station, TX 77845 (979) 399-7700 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE GRA H A M R OAD B R A N D E N B U R G L A N EWE L L B O R N R D MORT AR DRI VE LEGEND Page 22 of 223 Planning & Zoning Commission September 5, 2024 Scale 2,098 lots on approximately 552 acres of land Location 1188 Southern Pointe Parkway, generally located north of Peach Creek Cut-Off Road and east of State Highway 6 in the City’s Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). Applicant Schultz Engineering Project Manager Jesse DiMeolo, Senior Planner jdimeolo@cstx.gov Project Overview The original preliminary plan was approved in January 2017 and the most recent preliminary plan was approved in January 2023. The new, proposed preliminary plan changes the lot layout of the development, especially in the north to accommodate a reconfiguration of the four detention ponds, and requests three additional waivers to block lengths. With the original preliminary plan in 2017, 23 waivers to the subdivision regulations were requested. All were approved. Two of the waivers being requested with this project are modifications to the length of previous block length waivers and one request is completely new. Parkland Dedication At final buildout, approximately 34 acres of public parkland will be dedicated and developed with this Preliminary Plan. If any future changes are made, additional parkland may be required in accordance with the terms of the UDO. Traffic Impact Analysis A traffic impact analysis (TIA) was performed in July 2020 by Jones & Carter for the development and an addendum trip generation memo was provided by Schultz Engineering in October 2021. Staff requested that the applicant include a note on the Preliminary Plan that references the TIA with any amendments and mitigation work to be done. Compliant with Comprehensive Plan (including Master Plans) and Unified Development Ordinance Yes, with the exception of waivers previously approved in January 2017 and the waivers being requested with this preliminary plan. Compliant with Subdivision Regulations Yes, with the exception of the waivers previously approved in 2017 to block length, street projections, access ways and single-family residential parking requirements for platting and what is currently being requested for UDO Section 8.3.G.2 ‘Block Length.’ Staff Recommendation Staff recommends denial of the current waiver requests for block length and the Preliminary Plan. Preliminary Plan for Southern Pointe Subdivision PP2024-000008 Page 23 of 223 Planning & Zoning Commission September 5, 2024 Supporting Materials 1. Waiver Request 2. Block Length Waiver Exhibit 3. Applicant’s Supporting Information 4. Aerial 5. Preliminary Plan Page 24 of 223 SUBDIVISION WAIVER REQUESTS The proposed Preliminary Plan is in compliance with the applicable Subdivision Regulations contained in the UDO except for the following waiver requests: UDO Section 8.3.G.2 ‘Blocks’ (Block Length for Suburban Context Zones) - Per the requirements of this section, block length should be a maximum of 1,200 feet for areas designated as Suburban on the Thoroughfare Plan Functional Classification and Context Class Map. As shown in the attached waiver exhibit and screenshots shown below, the first waiver request has a new proposed length for Marietta Loop on the northside of Weddington Road. This distance is approximately 1,697 feet, which exceeds the maximum block length by 497 feet. The second waiver has a new proposed distance of 1,603 feet along Lane Rae Loop and exceeds the maximum block length by 403 feet. The third and final waiver for Katie Loop has a proposed distance of 1,474 and exceeds the maximum block length by 274 feet. The applicant is requesting these waivers as their intention is to match the final plat drawings and construction plans of the adjacent detention ponds along the northern perimeter of the subdivision. In addition to this is a previously approved strip of parkland that borders the northern perimeter, separating this subdivision from the adjacent Animate Habitat Ltd. Tract. Please note that the block length waiver exhibit provided by the applicant shows several more block length issues drawn with a bold, red line. All have been approved previously at the January 5, 2017, P&Z meeting. The only waivers changing and thus requiring new waiver requests are the Marietta Loop, Katie Loop, and Lane Rae Loop. In accordance with the Subdivision Regulations, when considering a waiver, the Planning and Zoning Commission should make the following findings to approve the waiver: 1) That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; 2) That the waivers are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; 3) The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering this chapter; and 4) That the granting of the waivers will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. Page 25 of 223 Waiver 1, Marietta Loop: UDO Section 8.3.G.2.c - A public street is required to break block length on Marietta Loop. Staff recommends denial of the waiver request. 1. That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land: Along the northern boundary, at the top edge of the image above, is the Animate Habitat property. This property is located within the City limits and is designated in the Comprehensive Plan as Suburban Residential. A break in the block along Marietta Loop would help provide an additional street projection to the north and will allow for connectivity between subdivisions and traffic to be distributed in multiple directions. Mather Parkway, off the image to the left, is the only projection north along a perimeter of more than 5,600 feet for Southern Pointe. There are no special circumstances affecting the land that would prohibit a break in block length of Marietta Loop. The City Parks Department is not opposed to a street projection through this area. 2. That the waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; Granting a waiver to block length would also eliminate a street projection north to the Animate Habitat tract. By having a break in the block, connectivity to future development and to the proposed thoroughfare at the top of the image is possible. A block length waiver is not Page 26 of 223 necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of the property. If a break is provided, traffic from the development can be distributed at another location within the development. 3. That the granting of the waivers will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to the other property in the area, or to the City in administering this chapter; and Granting this waiver may be detrimental as the subdivision is developed. A break in the blockface could provide a street extension to the north and allow traffic to connect to future thoroughfares. As mentioned previously, the only street access north is Mather Parkway. By providing the break in the block, connectivity between the similar land uses would be improved. 4. That the granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. Granting the waiver to block length will prevent the orderly subdivision of other land in the area. In the future, after Southern Pointe is developed and the Animate Habitat tract comes in to subdivide, that tract will have no ability to project roads to and through their southern perimeter, besides connecting into Mather Parkway. This will prevent the Animate Habitat tract from meeting the block length standards of the UDO as the thoroughfare along the shared property line is built. Page 27 of 223 Waiver 2, Lane Rae Loop: UDO Section 8.3.G.2.c - A public street is required to break block length on Lane Rae Loop. Staff recommends denial of the waiver request. 1. That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land: Many of the same arguments will be made against this waiver request as the location is also along the north property line, just on the west side of the Mather Parkway thoroughfare. The same Animate Habitat borders the property to the north. There are no special circumstances affecting the land that would prohibit a break in block length. 2. That the waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; A block length waiver is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of the property. If a break is provided, traffic from the development can be distributed at another location within the development. A redesign of the area to allow a street projection would not result in the large loss of potential residential lots. 3. That the granting of the waivers will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to the other property in the area, or to the City in administering this chapter; and Granting this waiver may be detrimental as the subdivision is developed. A break in the Page 28 of 223 blockface could provide a street extension to the north and allow traffic to connect to future thoroughfares. As mentioned previously, the only street access north is Mather Parkway. By providing the break in the block, connectivity between the similar land uses would be improved. 4. That the granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. The granting of this waiver would have a negative effect on the orderly subdivision of other land in the area. A break in the block along Lane Rae Loop would help provide a third street projection to the north, that is if Marietta Loop also projects to the north. As mentioned in the first waiver, the northern perimeter of Southern Pointe from corner to corner is just over 5,600 feet. If this were broken up into 1,200-foot segments, there would be more than four street projections. City staff believes three projections is more beneficial than one, allowing for more connectivity. Page 29 of 223 Waiver 3, Katie Loop: UDO Section 8.3.G.2.c - A public street is required to break block length on Katie Loop. Staff recommends denial of the waiver request. 1. That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land: There are no existing, special circumstances affecting the land that would prohibit a break in the Katie Loop block length. While there is a detention pond in the area, review by City engineers have determined there is room north of the detention pond to project Katie Loop east towards the Marietta Loop extension. This projection could also help open up further subdivision of Block 59, Lot 10, if so desired by the developer. One difference to note between this preliminary plan and the most recent one approved in January 2023 is that this plan proposes an additional cross street projecting west through Mather Parkway. Although this may increase connectivity within the subdivision, connectivity with adjacent properties to the north is still lacking and the block length of Katie Loop still exceeds the maximum allowed. Page 30 of 223 2. That the waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; A block length waiver is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of the property. If a break is provided, traffic from the development can be distributed at another location within the development. A redesign of the area to allow a street projection to the east, with the subdivision of Block 59, Lot 8 along that projection, could result in a net gain of residential lots for the area. 3. That the granting of the waivers will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to the other property in the area, or to the City in administering this chapter; and Granting this waiver may be detrimental as the subdivision and greater area develops. A break in the blockface could provide a street extension to the north or east and allow traffic to connect to other rights-of-ways. As mentioned previously, the only street access north is Mather Parkway. By providing the break in the block, overall connectivity would be improved. 4. That the granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. The granting of this waiver would have a negative effect on the orderly subdivision of other land in the area. A break in the block along Katie Loop could help provide an additional connection along the northern perimeter between the Mather Parkway projection and the future proposed minor arterial shown in the top right corner of the preliminary plan. Page 31 of 223 PARKLAND 1P 506A NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 1.17 AC. 3 19 PARKLAND 1P 802 COMMUNITY PARK 1.70 AC. COMMON AREA I 702 (3.279 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA G 506 (0.473 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA F 505 (1.422 ACRE DETENTION POND) 1 COMMON AREA C 115 (7.688 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA C 400 AND REC CENTER 2.33 ACRES 35 1 COMMON AREA A 200 (2.293 ACRE DETENTION POND) 23 1 1 COMMON AREA H 603 (6.760 ACRE DETENTION POND) 7 PARKLAND 1P 501 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 0.42 AC. PARKLAND 1P 505A NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 5.46 AC. PARKLAND 1P 702A COMMUNITY PARK 10.42 AC. PARKLAND 1P 603A COMMUNITY PARK 5.19 AC. 7 22 PARKLAND 1P 507 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 0.71 AC. 42 PARKLAND 1P 400 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 1.07 AC. 21 15 4444 30 27 33 PATR I O T D R I V E KEN N E S A W D R I V E NAT C H E Z D R I V E 17 18 15 12 1 30 2 37 7 5 39 9 510 8 26 11 8 9 10 2 17 17 12 15 4 25 4 23 21 19 16 15 207 8 9 24 28 27 26 21 23 22 19 22 25 20 3 27 14 15 27 282930313233 26 34 7 26 19 11 30 15 13 18 9 21 28 3 11 9 12 11 9 10 9 19 9 18 38 3641 28 3 17 13 35 44 10 19 14 16 20 15 13 18 17 19 18 16 20 10 14 13 1 4 16 14 11 2 7 3 8 13 4 9 5 6 10 16 41 14 40 39 30 38 37 43 36 26 35 42 34 17 1 40 39 37 23 24 22 31 10 7 9 2 29 27 25 21 20 18 11 5 6 4 8 12 33 3213 33 15 11 22 18 14 10 21 17 13 9 20 16 12 19 33 37 41 23 29 34 38 42 24 25 35 39 31 43 32 36 40 27 44 1 20 19 18 13 16 15 14 9 11 10 7 8 6 5 4 2 31 22 12 27 41 9 43 40 38 36 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 24 26 25 23 42 23 12 4 17 11 3 16 10 15 2 22 14 8 1 21 13 7 20 6 24 19 5 18 22 24 12 1 13 17 16 15 14 19 18 17 20 23 19 15 18 14 21 15 23 20 14 22 16 19 21 7 3 2 8 12 4 9 5 10 6 2 11 26 10 12 12 11 12 3 8 24 9 13 16 5 10 22 1 11 6 7 11 176 2 26 25 24 15 14 13 23 3 1 191816141523457810 7 9 12 10 19 22 24 25 2927 12 11 8 6 4 3 2 6 5 12 21 2 11 16 26 17 49 12 28 13 14 18 67 15 8 3 14 8 4 22 21 20 18 19 17 16 15 14 2 9 3 4 5 6 7 1 17 18 25 22 1 5 2 6 3 7 4 20 19 22 18 21 19 18 17 20 14 1213 13 151617181920 141516 151617 19 24 23 16 20 14 21 17 22 13 26 12 18 25 10 5 11 2 6 7 21 12 3 8 1 9 4 11 16 4 9 17 1018 5 1 6 7 2 3 8 15 4 1 5 21 12 6 13 22 3 7 2423212019 14 171211131615 2010 1211 8 7 6 1 8 2 3 10 4 11 5 6 7 9 16 8 25 15 7 24 14 6 23 13 5 22 19 12 4 18 113 17 1019 27 6 14 22 30 15 23 31 8 16 24 1 9 25 2 10 18 26 3 11 17 19 27 4 12 20 28 5 13 21 29 9 23 7 17 18 19 20 12 14 15 16 19 11 18 4 17 10 3 16 9 2 15 81 22 14 21 13 6 20 12 5 13 21 18 16 18 20 232425 2627282930 3132 1 13 6 5 3 2 1 6 14 15 7 16 4 8 12 5 9 2 10 33 3 11 12 4 5 9 17 6 10 14 2 7 11 8 18 11 14 17 19 13 10 9 12 20 22 128 9 10 11 25 24 7 23 6 15 18 5 21 17 9 4 16 11 8 20 3 19 2 10 2 1 5 4 3 21 1 2 3 4 18 19 20 16 10 17 18 11 12 13 20 1415 9 33 11 3 10 2 9 8 7 6 5 12 4 1 2931323534 17 23 22 21 20 19 18 16 28 26 25 24 23 19 20 13 21 14 22 15 23 16 24 17 18 9 1 18 8 24 17 7 16 6 15 5 22 14 4 21 13 11 3 20 12 10 2 19 10 20 13 14 20 13 19 12 1118 10 17 16 15 22 25 26 25 31 23 24 302928 26 2827 23 13 26 14 15 17 18 19 20 17 29 18 19 2 20 22 23 24 16 21 21 2 25 112 18 212019 7 6 5 12 4 11 3 10 9 8 16 15 5 21 13 24 6 20 3 10 4 7 22 11 1 8 12 19181716 4 8 1 16 2 3 14 7 13 6 12 5 11 10 3 9 2 1 15 8 15 14 11 10 9 13 14 24 16 9 23 8 22 15 7 21 14 6 20 13 5 19 12 4 26 18 11 25 17 10 27 15 17 11 12 9 14 16 18 19 11 19 20 15 16 17 13 12 10 9 14 18 URBAN / MULTI-FAMILY BLOCK 78 LOT 1 17.17 AC. 5 9 24 20 16 2 6 10 23 19 15 3 7 11 22 18 14 4 8 13 21 17 2 15314413567 17101169 13 2 20 18 22 4 12 8 26 19 23 3 11 7 2024 2 14 106 16 2125 13 951 35 8 44 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 11 18 20 19 25 26 32 12 13 10 GUNN RIDGE DRIVEMARIETTA LOOPLAUREL RIDGE LANEMARIETTA LOOPSEBRING DRIVEROCKFORD DRIVEWEDDINGTON ROADMARIETTA LOOPLAUREL RIDGE LANEMARIETTA LOOPKATIE LOOPLANE RAE LOOP LANA R A E L O O P PETAL LA N E SHUB A T A D R I V E CAMD E N L A N E AMOR Y D R I V E KINNEY LANE PETAL LANE SHUBATA DRIVE CAMDEN LANE AMORY DRIVE CONOLE CO U R T CHATOM DRIVEGUNN RIDGE DRIVEWEDDINGTON ROAD RISI DRIVE QUIN L A N D R I V E SAM A N T H A L A N E GUN N R I D G E D R I V E ELDORA DRIVE ELDORA DRIVEPOCONO DRIVEWILKESBORO DRIVETALLADEGA DRIVESOUTHERN CROSS DRIVEROCKFORD DRIVEDAYTONA DRIVEELDORA DRIVEPATRIOT DRIVE CANT O N D R I V E VERO N A D R I V E PATR I O T D R I V E KEN N E S A W D R I V E SOUTHERN POINTE PARKWAY SOUT H E R N P O I N T E P A R K W A Y MATHER PARKWAYMATHER PARKWAYRALEIGH DRIVEMINOR COLLECTORMAJOR COLLECTOR16 27 368 13 765 4 17 16 15 14 10 12 11 9 10 11 14 9 12 13 8 15 76 1918 17 23 16 222120 12 9 10 13 14 11 15 18 23 14 19 15 20 16 21 17 22 8 3 7 2 11 6 10 5 9 4 14 40 35 36 34 22 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 13 12 CAN T O N D R I V E VER O N A D R I V EVERONA DRIVEWAT K I N S W A YVICKI LANEKINNEY LANE5 3 4 2 32 24 23 29 25 26 28 10 2 9 8 7 6 5 12 4 11 3 1 24 1 1 17 30 13 17 28 24 32 272829 26 33363534 3132 30 ROXIE LANE31 COMMERCIAL BLOCK 81 LOT 2 3.45 AC. COMMERCIAL BLOCK 81 LOT 1 1.96 AC. COMMERCIAL BLOCK 81 LOT 3 7.37 AC. COMMERCIAL BLOCK 82 LOT 3 3.00 AC. COMMERCIAL BLOCK 82 LOT 1 1.67 AC. 13 PARKLAND 1P 106 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 0.54 AC. PARKLAND 1P 101 PARKLAND 1P 500 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 0.22 AC. PARKLAND 1P 200 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 5.95 AC.VICKI LANE2 5 8 3 29 15 3 23 13 14 COMMERCIAL BLOCK 82 LOT 2 1.77 AC. 2 5 5 8 2 1 7 6 5 3 23 18 14 18 12 17 13 9 16 10 22 15 19 11 24 23 21 20 1 2 3 4 8 6 7 1089 1 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 21 19 20 22 1 27 28 9 8 1 2 3 11 4 12 18 5 136 14 7 17 10 16 15 7 33 6 32 5 31 4 30 3 9 2 8 1 29 28 26 25 24 23 212019181715141312 11 10 22 1 6 27 12 11 10 6 9 7 5 8 8 7 2 14 13 6 1 3 4 1 13 9 COMMERCIAL BLOCK 82 LOT 4 11.90 AC. PARKLAND 2P 501 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 0.33 AC. 2 10 8 1 5 4 3 2 5 6 4 9 3 272829 32 34 35 36 37 38 39 42 44 45 46 47 49 52 53 2 1 3 21 22 18 17 23 48 50 40 3 2 9 2 10 3 11 4 12 5 13 6 7 8 6 11 9 10 5 12 13 1 7 15 14 1 20 9 16 22 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 19 21 20 1718 31 2 33 3132 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 161514 131211 1098 43 1 26 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 5 6 7 10 8 25 22 23 2421 27 17 28 16 29 15 30 14 31 33 34 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 32 22 14 7 21 13 6 20 5 19 12 4 18 11 3 17 10 2 16 15 8 1 33 34 39 35 36 37 38 41 40 42 43 1716915814131211107432165 35 34 23 25 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 5234 6 7 8 10 1 11 2421 41 33 31 30 37 38 39 42 43 41 24 18 17 BALD W I N D R I V E MARIETTA LOOP 24 11 12 51 43 5 4 20 15 16 7 17 8 18 9 19 10 1 11 13 14 12 2 3 4 56 12 8 9 10 14 13 11 16 15 14 24 27 413 25 26 12 7 11 28 29 30 32 1 9 8 10 2 3 6 5 4 4 PARKLAND 1P 602 COMMUNITY PARK 1.09 AC. 76 26 28 29 27 27 25 13 30313233343536 37 38 39 40 42 42 43 44 4546474849 50 51 52 53 54 5657 55 58 60 62 63 63 64 64 84 76 72 70 68 66 65 67 69 71 73 74 76 76 41 78 80 79 79 79 81 82 42 75 61 59 59 55 76 76 12 11 13 15 16 18 1603 LF 620 LF620 LF620 LF620 LF620 LF620 LF623 LF627 LF663 LF931 LF 675 LF791 L F 748 L F 821 L F 837 L F 909 L F 925 L F 684 L F 573 L F 679 LF 1488 LF1332 L F 606 LF 688 LF 706 LF 788 LF 806 LF 888 LF 906 LF 988 LF 675 LF 548 LF 553 LF 581 LF 586 LF 595 LF 595 LF 581 LF 722 LF419 LF577 LF 1006 LF 1146 LF1148 LF1148 LF1148 LF1148 LF1148 LF1148 LF1148 LF1148 LF1148 LF1142 LF 1141 LF 1697 LF 1909 LF1198 LF 553 LF 464 L F 773 L F 840 L F 858 L F 1099 L F 1328 L F 647 LF 652 LF354 LF627 LF620 LF1474 LF441 LF790 LF931 LF 908 LF503 LF 820 LF 795 LF 308 LF117 LF257 LF 266 LF31 BRAXTON DRIVE 20 547 LF TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840 www (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER: PRELIMINARY PLAN NOT FOR RECORD SOUTHERN POINTE SUBDIVISION 552.9 ACRES 2,097 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 8 COMMERCIAL LOTS 1 REC CENTER LOT 1 ATMOS SITE 1 LIFT STATION SITE 1 URBAN/MULTI-FAMILY LOT S D SMITH LEAGUE, A-21 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS, TEXAS SCALE: AS SHOWN AUGUST, 2024SURVEYOR: Nathan Paul Kerr, RPLS No. 6834 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 TBPELS FIRM # 10018500 SECTION 105: 14.061 ACRES - 69 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.022 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 507: 3.304 ACRES - 13 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 109: 3.121 ACRES - 1 COMMERCIAL LOT (0.004 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 600: 16.024 ACRES - 85 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.862 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 117: 7.581 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.973 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 601: 18.887 ACRES - 101 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.226 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 203: 23.589 ACRES - 129 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.678 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 602: 17.548 ACRES - 64 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.286 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 402: 17.174 ACRES - 1 URBAN/MF LOT (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 603: 6.760 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (6.760 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 403B: 0.465 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.264 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 603A: 5.191 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 500: 11.218 ACRES - 58 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.419 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 700: 18.080 ACRES - 88 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.409 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 501: 17.487 ACRES - 87 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.344 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 701: 12.804 ACRES - 59 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.321 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 502: 6.048 ACRES - 34 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.134 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 702: 3.279 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (3.279 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 503: 19.460 ACRES - 106 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (1.146 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 702A: 10.423 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 504: 22.971 ACRES - 96 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.392 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 800: 8.642 ACRES - 50 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.342 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 505: 1.422 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (1.422 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 801: 18.398 ACRES - 100 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.627 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 505A: 5.458 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 802: 22.365 ACRES - 108 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.507 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 506: 0.473 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.473 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 803: 12.211 ACRES - 69 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.344 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 506A: 1.168 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SAVE AND EXCEPT SECTION 100: 49.184 ACRES - 150 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (6.922 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 119: 4.949 ACRES - 28 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 101: 10.439 ACRES - 57 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.040 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 120: 5.321 ACRES - 29 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 102: 9.899 ACRES - 56 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 200: 26.067 ACRES - 65 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.373 ACRES C.A.) & ATMOS/LIFT STATION SECTION 103: 9.899 ACRES - 56 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 201: 15.764 ACRES - 83 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 104: 6.675 ACRES - 36 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.080 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 202: 18.808 ACRES - 97 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.053 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 106: 10.399 ACRES - 57 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.197 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 400: 15.507 ACRES - 67 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.772 ACRES C.A.) & REC CENTER SECTION 111: 5.424 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 401: 12.788 ACRES - 3 COMMERCIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 115: 7.688 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (7.688 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 403: 18.515 ACRES - 4 COMMERCIAL LOTS (0.176 ACRES C.A.) OWNER: Phillips 3 Land Holdings, LLC 1140 Midtown Drive College Station, TX 77845 (979) 255-4466 DEVELOPER: BV Southern Pointe Development, Inc. 1140 Midtown Drive College Station, TX 77845 (979) 255-4466 WAIVERS APPROVED AT JANUARY 5, 2017 P&Z MEETING WAIVER #BLOCK #APPROVED LENGTH (FEET) PROPOSED LENGTH (FEET) 11 55 1570 1697 12 42 1909 --- 13 44 1328 --- 15 64 1488 --- 16 63 1332 --- 18 76 1388 1603 GENERAL SUBURBAN BLOCK LENGTH EXHIBIT NEW WAIVER BLOCK # LENGTH (FEET) 59 1474 Page 32 of 223 Waiver to Article 8.3.G.2.c Block Length Justification for Waiver 1 – Block 55: The requested waiver is for BLOCK LENGTH, BLOCK 55, which is 1,697 feet in length which exceeds the maximum block length of 1,200’. This block length is located on the east, north and west sides of BLOCK 55. 1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. The special circumstances are the parkland and detention pond to the west and north and the parkland to the east of the block in this section of the subdivision. Also, there are existing drainage ways that would have to be disturbed to construct streets to the adjacent tract. Complying with the block length requirements would require an unwanted break in the parkland if a road was extended to the north. A street cannot be extended to the west or north due to the detention ponds in Section 603 and 702. 2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property right of the applicant. Granting this waiver will allow the development to continue as planned with Mather Parkway being the only break in the linear park along the north west property line. 3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. The granting of the waivers for this development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property as the development will comply with all other standards or requirements. 4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the previsions of the Unified Development Ordinance. The granting of the waiver will not affect the subdivision of the adjacent property as it will have access to Mather Parkway and to State Highway 6. Page 33 of 223 Waiver to Article 8.3.G.2.c Block Length Justification for Waiver 2 – Block 59: The requested waiver is for BLOCK LENGTH, BLOCK 59, which is 1,474 feet in length which exceeds the maximum block length of 1,200’. This block length is located on the east and north sides of BLOCK 59. 5. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. The special circumstances are the parkland and detention pond to the east and the parkland to the north of the block in this section of the subdivision. Complying with the block length requirements would require an unwanted break in the parkland if a road was extended to the north. A street cannot be extended to the east due to the detention pond in Section 603. 6. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property right of the applicant. Granting this waiver will allow the development to continue as planned with Mather Parkway being the only break in the linear park along the north west property line. 7. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. The granting of the waivers for this development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property as the development will comply with all other standards or requirements. 8. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the previsions of the Unified Development Ordinance. The granting of the waiver will not affect the subdivision of the adjacent property as it will have access to Mather Parkway and to State Highway 6. Page 34 of 223 Waiver to Article 8.3.G.2.c Block Length Justification for Waiver 3 – Block 76: The requested waiver is for BLOCK LENGTH, BLOCK 76, which is 1,603 feet in length which exceeds the maximum block length of 1,200’. This block length is located on the north and west sides of BLOCK 59. 1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that strict application of the subdivision regulations will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. The special circumstances are the parkland and detention pond to the east and the parkland to the north of the block in this section of the subdivision. Complying with the block length requirements would require an unwanted break in the parkland if a road was extended to the north. A street cannot be extended to the west due to the park in section 505A. 2. The waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property right of the applicant. Granting this waiver will allow the development to continue as planned with Mather Parkway being the only break in the linear park along the north west property line. 3. The granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area, or to the City in administering subdivision regulations. The granting of the waivers for this development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property as the development will comply with all other standards or requirements. 4. The granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the previsions of the Unified Development Ordinance. The granting of the waiver will not affect the subdivision of the adjacent property as it will have access to Mather Parkway and to State Highway 6. Page 35 of 223 PARKLAND 1P 506A NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 1.17 AC. 3 19 PARKLAND 1P 802 COMMUNITY PARK 1.70 AC. COMMON AREA I 702 (3.279 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA G 506 (0.473 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA F 505 (1.422 ACRE DETENTION POND) 1 COMMON AREA C 115 (7.688 ACRE DETENTION POND) 11 COMMON AREA C 400 AND REC CENTER 2.33 ACRES 35 1 COMMON AREA D 100 (6.627 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA A 200 (2.293 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA C117 (2.973 ACRE DETENTION POND) 23 1 1 COMMON AREA H 603 (6.760 ACRE DETENTION POND) 7 PARKLAND 1P 501 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 0.42 AC. PARKLAND 1P 505A NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 5.46 AC. PARKLAND 1P 702A COMMUNITY PARK 10.42 AC. PARKLAND 1P 603A COMMUNITY PARK 5.19 AC. 7 22 PARKLAND 1P 507 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 0.71 AC. 42 PARKLAND 1P 120 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 0.17 AC.PARKLAND 1P 105 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 1.04 AC. PARKLAND 1P 400 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 1.07 AC. 21 15 4444 30 27 33DARLINGTON AVENUEDAR L I N G T O N A V E N U E PATR I O T D R I V E KENN E S A W D R I V E NAT C H E Z D R I V E SOUTHERN P O I N T E P A R K W A Y DARLINGTON AVENUE ELDORA DRIVEDAYTONA DRIVEROCKFORD DRIVESOUTHERN CROSS DRIVEDARLINGTON AVENUE MATCHLINE MATCHLINEMATCHLINE MATCHLINE MATCHLINE17 18 15 12 1 30 2 37 7 5 39 9 510 8 26 11 8 9 10 2 17 17 12 15 4 25 4 23 21 19 16 15 207 8 9 1 21 3 2410 23 7 24 28 27 26 21 23 22 19 22 25 20 3 27 14 15 27282930313233 26 34 25 1 3 2 3 29 3 28 26 27 8 7 7 25 26 19 6 5 28 11 30 15 13 18 9 21 28 3 17 8 11 11 22 33 44 5 7 9 8 7 12 6 11 9 10 6 5 9 19 8 7 66 5 4 3 2 1 7 5 9 8 4 18 38 3641 28 3 17 13 35 44 10 26 25 19 21 24 14 23 27 22 16 21 26 20 15 13 28 18 17 19 28 18 27 23 16 22 26 21 20 10 25 14 24 13 1 4 16 14 11 2 7 3 8 13 4 9 5 6 10 16 41 14 40 39 30 38 37 43 36 26 35 42 34 17 1 40 39 37 23 24 22 31 10 7 9 2 29 27 25 21 20 18 11 5 6 4 8 12 33 3213 33 15 11 22 18 14 10 21 17 13 9 20 16 12 19 33 37 41 23 29 34 38 42 24 25 35 39 31 43 32 36 40 27 44 1 20 19 18 13 16 15 14 9 11 10 7 8 6 5 4 2 31 22 12 27 41 9 43 40 38 36 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 24 26 25 23 42 23 12 4 17 11 3 16 10 15 2 22 14 8 1 21 13 7 20 6 24 19 5 18 22 24 12 1 13 17 16 15 14 19 18 17 20 23 19 15 18 14 21 15 23 20 14 22 16 19 21 7 3 2 8 12 4 9 5 10 6 2 11 26 10 12 12 11 12 3 8 24 9 13 16 5 10 22 1 11 6 7 11 176 2 26 25 24 15 14 13 23 3 1 191816141523457810 7 9 12 10 19 22 24 25 2927 12 11 8 6 4 3 2 6 5 12 21 211 16 26 17 49 12 28 13 14 18 67 15 8 3 14 8 4 22 21 20 18 19 17 16 15 14 2 9 3 4 5 6 7 1 17 18 2522 1 5 2 6 3 7 4 20 19 22 18 21 19 18 17 20 14 1213 13 151617181920 141516 151617 19 24 23 16 2014 21 17 22 13 26 12 18 25 10 5 11 2 6 7 21 12 3 8 1 9 4 11 16 4 917 1018 5 1 6 7 2 3 8 15 4 1 5 21 12 6 13 22 3 7 242321201914171211131615 2010 1211 8 7 6 1 8 2 3 10 4 11 5 6 7 9 16 8 25 15 7 24 14 6 23 135 22 19 124 18 113 17 1019 27 6 14 22 30 15 2331 8 16 24 1 9 25 2 10 18 26 3 11 17 19 27 4 12 20 28 5 13 21 29 9 23 7 17 18 19 20 12 14 15 16 19 11 18 4 17 103 16 92 15 81 22 14 21 13 6 20 12 5 13 21 18 16 1820 23242526272829303132 1 13 6 5 3 2 1 6 14 15 7 16 4 8 12 5 9 2 10 33 3 11 12 4 5 9 17 6 10 14 2 7 11 8 8 4 18 11 7 3 14 17 19 2 13 10 9 1 12 20 22 27 22 9 23 68 12 17 13 15 14 16 18 1 2 22 3 5 24 6 20 25 7 8 26 9 10 27 11 25 24 7 23 6 15 18 5 21 17 9 4 16 11 8 20 3 19 2 10 10 9 8 6 7 2 1 5 4 3 21 8 1 9 2 10 16 3 17 4 185 19 6 20 2 54 35 36 37 38 33 32 31 30 29 34 28 16 22 16 23 10 17 24 18 11 12 13 20 14 21 15 9 33 11 3 10 2 9 8 7 6 5 12 4 1 2931323534 17 23 22 21 20 19 18 16 28 26 25 24 23 19 20 13 21 14 22 15 23 16 24 17 18 9 1 18 8 24 17 7 16 6 15 5 22 14 4 21 13 11 3 20 12 10 2 19 1 3 2 6 10 4 1 9 4 3 2 8 7 6 13 5 2 1 8 25 9 24 23 22 1227 11 19 10 7 13 6 12 5 11 10 9 8 4 3 24 21 20 19 18 17 14 15 22 23 27 26 23 2 7 6 5 4 3 8 10 20 21 27 22 23 28 24 25 13 26 27 21 14 20 13 26 19 12 11 25 18 10 24 17 28 23 16 22 15 22 25 26 25 31 23 24 302928 26 2827 23 13 26 14 15 17 18 19 20 17 29 18 19 2 20 22 23 24 16 21 21 2 25 112 18 212019 7 6 5 12 4 11 3 10 9 8 22 1615 5 21 13 24 6 20 3 10 4 7 22 11 1 8 12 19181716 4 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 16 2 3 14 7 13 6 12 5 11 10 3 9 2 1 15 8 15 14 11 10 9 13 14 24 16 9 23 8 22 15 7 21 14 6 20 13 5 19 12 4 26 18 11 25 17 10 28 29 30 383736353433 40 32 39 31 27 15 17 11 7 66 5 4 2 1 12 7 3 5 9 14 8 4 16 18 19 23 11 28 22 19 21 27 20 1 26 15 25 16 24 17 2 13 12 3 10 9 14 8 18 1 13 17 2 9 2 19 11 17 24 16 6 4 10 1 3 8 5 7 24 22 251 2 11 14 1315 19 18 9 6 4 7 10 1 515 19 14 11 12 14 15 10 14 15 18 23 22 21 20 19 18 16 17 25 9 10 6 7 8 9 1 4 5 12 2 13 11 23 645 87 109 21201918171615141312 1514131211109765432 20 6 2 16 24 28 12 5 21 25 18 8 4 11 22 26 7 3 23 27 1 13 17 3 8 12 16 URBAN / MULTI-FAMILY BLOCK 78 LOT 1 17.17 AC. LIFT STATION SITE 2 32 28 25 21 17 6 9 13 31 24 20 3 7 10 14 30 23 19 4 8 11 15 29 26 22 18 1 5 12 16 33 5 9 24 20 16 2 6 10 23 19 15 3 7 11 22 18 14 4 8 13 21 17 2 15314413567 17101169 13 2 20 1822 4 128 26 1923 3 117 2024 2 14 106 16 2125 13951 18 19 35 ATMOS SITE 2 8 44 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 11 18 20 19 25 26 32 12 13 10 GUNN RIDGEDRIVEMARIETTA LOOPLAUREL RIDGE LANEMARIETTA LOOPSEBRING DRIVEROCKFORD DRIVEWEDDINGTON ROADMARIETTA LOOPLAUREL RIDGE LANEMARIETTA LOOPKATIE LOOPLANE RAE LOOP LANA R A E L O O P PETAL LA N E SHUBA T A D R I V E CAMD E N L A N E AMOR Y D R I V E KINNEY L A N E PETAL LANE SHUBATA DRIVE CAMDEN LANE AMORY DRIVE CONOLE C O U R T CHATOM DRIVEGUNN RIDGE DRIVEWEDDINGTON ROAD RISI DRIVE QUIN L A N D R I V E SAM A N T H A L A N E GUN N R I D G E D R I V E ELDORA DRIVE ELDORA DRIVEPOCONO DRIVEWILKESBORO DRIVETALLADEGA DRIVESOUTHERN CROSS DRIVEROCKFORD DRIVEDAYTONA DRIVEELDORA DRIVEWILKESBORO DRIVETALLADEGA DRIVEROCKFORD DRIVEDAYTONA DRIVEPATRIOT DRIVE CANT O N D R I V E VER O N A D R I V E PATR I O T D R I V E KEN N E S A W D R I V E GREENVILLE DRIVETRADO DRIVERALEIGH DRIVETRADO DRIVEPROMENADE DRIVEFULTON DRIVER A L E I G H L O O PMATHER PARKWAYELDORA DRIVESOUTHERN POINTE PARKWAY SOUT H E R N P O I N T E P A R K W A Y MATHER PARKWAYMATHER PARKWAYRALEIGH DRIVESOUTHERN CROSS DRIVESH 6 S FRONTAGE RD ESH 6 S FRONTAGE RD WTEXAS WOR L D S P E E D W A Y SH 6 NSH 6 SPIPELINE RDSTAUFFER CR BALL CR MINOR ARTER I A L MINOR COLLECTOR MINOR ARTERIAL MINOR COLLECTORM A J O R A R T E R I A L MAJOR COLLECTORMINOR ARTERIALELDORA DRIVEPOCONO DRIVESPARTAN DRIVEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINE MATCHLINE 16 SH 6 NSH 6 SSH 6 S FRONTAGE RD E27 368 13 7654 17 16 15 14 10 12 11 9 10 11 14 9 12 13 8 15 76 191817 23 16 222120 12 4 8 3 6 9 10 2 7 1 5 13 14 11 15 18 23 14 19 15 20 16 21 17 22 8 3 7 2 11 6 10 5 9 4 14 40 35 36 34 22 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 13 12 CANT O N D R I V E VERO N A D R I V EVERONA DRIVEWAT K I N S W A YVICKI LANEKINNEY LANE5 3 4 2 1 32 24 23 29 25 26 28 10 2 9 8 7 6 5 12 4 11 3 1 24 1 1 3 4 5 6 7 33 32 31 30 28 17 G A I N E S V I L L E D R I V E 21 20 30 13 27 17 28 24 32 272829 2633363534313230 ROXIE LANE12 11 15 14 13 31 COMMERCIAL BLOCK 81 LOT 2 3.45 AC. COMMERCIAL BLOCK 81 LOT 1 1.96 AC. COMMERCIAL BLOCK 81 LOT 3 7.37 AC. COMMERCIAL BLOCK 25 LOT 41 1.67 AC. COMMERCIAL BLOCK 82 LOT 3 3.00 AC. COMMERCIAL BLOCK 82 LOT 1 1.67 AC. 4 13 PARKLAND 1P 117 NIEGHBORHOOD PARK 4.61 AC. PARKLAND 1P 100 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 10.57 AC. PARKLAND 1P 104 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 0.22 AC. PARKLAND 2P 100 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 0.04 AC. PARKLAND 1P 106 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 0.54 AC. PARKLAND 1P 101 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 0.53 AC. PARKLAND 1P 500 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 0.22 AC. PARKLAND 1P 200 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 5.95 AC.VICKI LANE2 5 8 3 29 15 3 23 5 7 12 11 9 8 14 13 15 18 17 1626 29 34 10 11 12 27 23 22 21 20 19 14 16 15 24 26 25 13 14 COMMERCIAL BLOCK 82 LOT 2 1.77 AC. 2 5 5 8 2 1 7 6 5 3 23 18 14 18 12 17 13 9 16 10 22 15 19 11 24 23 21 20 1 2 3 4 8 6 7 1089 1 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 21 19 20 22 1 2728 9 8 1 2 3 11 4 12 18 5 136 14 7 17 10 16 15 7 33 6 32 5 31 4 30 3 9 2 8 1 29 28 26 25 24 23212019181715141312 11 10 22 1 6 27 12 11 10 6 9 7 5 8 8 7 2 14 13 6 1 3 4 1 13 9 COMMERCIAL BLOCK 82 LOT 4 11.90 AC. PARKLAND 2P 501 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 0.33 AC. 2 10 8 1 5 4 3 2 5 6 4 9 3 272829 32 34 35 36 37 38 39 42 44 45 46 47 49 52 53 2 1 3 21 22 18 17 23 48 50 40 3 2 9 2 10 3 11 4 12 5 13 6 7 8 6 11910 5 12 13 17 1514 1 20 9 16 22 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 19 21 20 1718 31 2 33 3132 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 1615141312111098 43 1 26 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 5 6 7 10 8 25 22 23 2421 27 17 28 16 29 15 30 14 31 33 34 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 32 22 14 7 21 13 6 20 5 19 12 4 18 11 3 17 10 2 16 15 8 1 33 34 39 35 36 37 38 41 40 42 43 1716915814131211107432165 35 34 23 25 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 702A 803 802801800 601 602504 506505A 402 403 18822/117 401 18287/148 502 501 500 503 400 18633/130 201 17939/274 202 19112/143 203 106 18712/184 701700 103 18123/233 119 18123/233 102 17710/93 120 18188/212 104 18188/212 105 117 115 18287/148 200 600 109 111 603 200 17135/211 101 17135/180 100 15287/51 507 403B 505 603A 702 506A 5234 6 7 8 10 1 11 2421 41 33 31 30 37 38 39 42 43 41 24 18 17 1 BAL D W I N D R I V E MARIETTA LOOP 24 11 12 51 43 5 4 20 15 16 7 17 8 18 9 19 10 1 11 13 14 12 2 3 4 56 12 8 9 10 14 13 11 16 15 14 24 27 413 25 26 12 7 11 28 29 30 32 1 9 810 2 3 6 5 4 4 PARKLAND 1P 602 COMMUNITY PARK 1.09 AC. 76 1 2 3 3 4 4 56 7 88 9 10 11 83 12 13 1415161718192021 22 23 24 25 26 28 29 27 27 25 13 30313233343536 37 38 39 40 42 42 43 44 4546474849 50 51 52 53 54 55 5657 55 58 59 60 59 62 63 63 64 64 84 76 76 72 70 68 66 65 67 69 71 73 74 76 76 41 78 80 79 79 79 8 81 82 76 42 75 61 31 BRAXTON DRIVE 20 LEGEND LEGEND ¹ ³ VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE ST A T E H I G H W A Y N O . 6 MES A VER DE DR P I P E L IN E RD CITY O F C O L L E G E S T A TI O N CI T Y LI MI T S PEACH CREEK CUT OFF RDELDORA DRTBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840 www (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER: PRELIMINARY PLAN NOT FOR RECORD SOUTHERN POINTE SUBDIVISION 552.9 ACRES 2,097 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 8 COMMERCIAL LOTS 1 REC CENTER LOT 1 ATMOS SITE 1 LIFT STATION SITE 1 URBAN/MULTI-FAMILY LOT S D SMITH LEAGUE, A-21 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS, TEXAS SCALE: AS SHOWN AUGUST, 2024SURVEYOR: Nathan Paul Kerr, RPLS No. 6834 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 TBPELS FIRM # 10018500 SECTION 105: 14.061 ACRES - 69 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.022 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 507: 3.304 ACRES - 13 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 109: 3.121 ACRES - 1 COMMERCIAL LOT (0.004 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 600: 16.024 ACRES - 85 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.862 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 117: 7.581 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.973 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 601: 18.887 ACRES - 101 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.226 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 203: 23.589 ACRES - 129 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.678 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 602: 17.548 ACRES - 64 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.286 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 402: 17.174 ACRES - 1 URBAN/MF LOT (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 603: 6.760 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (6.760 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 403B: 0.465 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.264 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 603A: 5.191 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 500: 11.218 ACRES - 58 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.419 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 700: 18.080 ACRES - 88 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.409 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 501: 17.487 ACRES - 87 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.344 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 701: 12.804 ACRES - 59 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.321 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 502: 6.048 ACRES - 34 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.134 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 702: 3.279 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (3.279 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 503: 19.460 ACRES - 106 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (1.146 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 702A: 10.423 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 504: 22.971 ACRES - 96 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.392 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 800: 8.642 ACRES - 50 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.342 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 505: 1.422 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (1.422 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 801: 18.398 ACRES - 100 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.627 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 505A: 5.458 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 802: 22.365 ACRES - 108 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.507 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 506: 0.473 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.473 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 803: 12.211 ACRES - 69 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.344 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 506A: 1.168 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SAVE AND EXCEPT SECTION 100: 49.184 ACRES - 150 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (6.922 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 119: 4.949 ACRES - 28 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 101: 10.439 ACRES - 57 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.040 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 120: 5.321 ACRES - 29 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 102: 9.899 ACRES - 56 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 200: 26.067 ACRES - 65 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.373 ACRES C.A.) & ATMOS/LIFT STATION SECTION 103: 9.899 ACRES - 56 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 201: 15.764 ACRES - 83 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 104: 6.675 ACRES - 36 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.080 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 202: 18.808 ACRES - 97 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.053 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 106: 10.399 ACRES - 57 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.197 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 400: 15.507 ACRES - 67 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.772 ACRES C.A.) & REC CENTER SECTION 111: 5.424 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 401: 12.788 ACRES - 3 COMMERCIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 115: 7.688 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (7.688 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 403: 18.515 ACRES - 4 COMMERCIAL LOTS (0.176 ACRES C.A.) OWNER: Phillips 3 Land Holdings, LLC 1140 Midtown Drive College Station, TX 77845 (979) 255-4466 DEVELOPER: BV Southern Pointe Development, Inc. 1140 Midtown Drive College Station, TX 77845 (979) 255-4466 Page 37 of 223 COMMON AREA A 500COMMON AREA F 505 (1.422 ACRE DETENTION POND)COMMON AREA B 403BCOMMON AREA C 501COMMON AREA B 500COMMON AREA C 500COMMON AREC A 501COMMON AREA A 502COMMON AREA B 502COMMON AREA A 403B ANDPRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTCOMMON AR E A B 5 0 1 PARKLAND 1P 501 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 0.42 AC. PARKLAND 1P 505A NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 5.46 AC. 7 PARKLAND 1P 507 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 0.71 AC. 7 18 19 14 17 1211 13 1615 10 12 11 8 7 6 1 8 2 3 10 4 11 5 6 7 9 876 13 5 12 4 11 3 10 1 9 27 6 22 30 23 31 8 24 1 9 25 2 10 26 3 11 27 4 12 28 5 29 23 7 17 18 19 20 12 14 15 16 19 18 4 17 10 3 16 9 2 8 1 22 21 6 20 5 URBAN / MULTI-FAMILY BLOCK 78 LOT 1 17.17 AC. 13 2 22 4 8 26 19 23 3 11 7 20 24 2 10 6 21 25 9 51 KINNEY LANE PETAL LANE SHUBATA DRIVE CAMDEN LANE AMORY DRIVE CONOLE CO U R T CHATOM DRIVEMATCHLINEMATCHLINESH 6 NSH 6 SSH 6 S FRONTAGE RD E28 24 32 272829 26 33363534 3132 30 COMMERCIAL BLOCK 82 LOT 3 3.00 AC. COMMERCIAL BLOCK 82 LOT 1 PARKLAND 1P 500 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 0.22 AC. 1 13 9 COMMERCIAL BLOCK 82 LOT 4 11.90 AC. PARKLAND 2P 501 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 0.33 AC. 2 10 8 1 5 4 3 2 5 6 4 9 3 505A 402 403 18822/117 502 501 500 507 403B 505 63 64 64 84 76 72 70 68 66 76 LEGEND LEGEND TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840 www (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER: PRELIMINARY PLAN NOT FOR RECORD SOUTHERN POINTE SUBDIVISION 552.9 ACRES 2,097 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 8 COMMERCIAL LOTS 1 REC CENTER LOT 1 ATMOS SITE 1 LIFT STATION SITE 1 URBAN/MULTI-FAMILY LOT S D SMITH LEAGUE, A-21 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS, TEXAS SCALE: AS SHOWN AUGUST, 2024SURVEYOR: Nathan Paul Kerr, RPLS No. 6834 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 TBPELS FIRM # 10018500 SECTION 105: 14.061 ACRES - 69 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.022 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 507: 3.304 ACRES - 13 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 109: 3.121 ACRES - 1 COMMERCIAL LOT (0.004 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 600: 16.024 ACRES - 85 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.862 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 117: 7.581 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.973 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 601: 18.887 ACRES - 101 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.226 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 203: 23.589 ACRES - 129 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.678 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 602: 17.548 ACRES - 64 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.286 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 402: 17.174 ACRES - 1 URBAN/MF LOT (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 603: 6.760 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (6.760 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 403B: 0.465 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.264 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 603A: 5.191 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 500: 11.218 ACRES - 58 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.419 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 700: 18.080 ACRES - 88 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.409 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 501: 17.487 ACRES - 87 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.344 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 701: 12.804 ACRES - 59 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.321 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 502: 6.048 ACRES - 34 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.134 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 702: 3.279 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (3.279 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 503: 19.460 ACRES - 106 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (1.146 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 702A: 10.423 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 504: 22.971 ACRES - 96 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.392 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 800: 8.642 ACRES - 50 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.342 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 505: 1.422 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (1.422 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 801: 18.398 ACRES - 100 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.627 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 505A: 5.458 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 802: 22.365 ACRES - 108 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.507 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 506: 0.473 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.473 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 803: 12.211 ACRES - 69 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.344 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 506A: 1.168 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SAVE AND EXCEPT SECTION 100: 49.184 ACRES - 150 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (6.922 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 119: 4.949 ACRES - 28 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 101: 10.439 ACRES - 57 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.040 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 120: 5.321 ACRES - 29 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 102: 9.899 ACRES - 56 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 200: 26.067 ACRES - 65 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.373 ACRES C.A.) & ATMOS/LIFT STATION SECTION 103: 9.899 ACRES - 56 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 201: 15.764 ACRES - 83 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 104: 6.675 ACRES - 36 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.080 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 202: 18.808 ACRES - 97 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.053 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 106: 10.399 ACRES - 57 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.197 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 400: 15.507 ACRES - 67 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.772 ACRES C.A.) & REC CENTER SECTION 111: 5.424 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 401: 12.788 ACRES - 3 COMMERCIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 115: 7.688 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (7.688 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 403: 18.515 ACRES - 4 COMMERCIAL LOTS (0.176 ACRES C.A.) OWNER: Phillips 3 Land Holdings, LLC 1140 Midtown Drive College Station, TX 77845 (979) 255-4466 DEVELOPER: BV Southern Pointe Development, Inc. 1140 Midtown Drive College Station, TX 77845 (979) 255-4466 Page 38 of 223 PARKLAND 1P 506A NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 1.17 AC. 3 19 COMMON AREA G 506 (0.473 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA F 505 (1.422 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMM O N A R E A C 5 0 3COMMON AREA A 502COMMON AREA D 50323 COMMON AREA E 503COMMON AREA C 602 COM M O N A R E A A 5 0 4 PARKLAND 1P 505A NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 5.46 AC. 21 15 MATCHLINE 9 510 8 26 11 8 9 10 2 14 7 11 18 6 2 26 25 24 15 14 13 23 3 2 3 4 5 7 8 10 7 9 12 10 19 22 24 25 27 6 5 21 11 16 26 17 49 12 28 13 14 18 67 15 8 3 8 4 2 3 1 25 22 1 5 2 6 3 7 4 20 19 22 18 21 19 18 17 20 14 12 13 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 14 15 16 15 16 17 24 23 26 25 10 5 11 2 6 7 21 12 3 8 1 9 4 16 4 9 17 10 18 5 1 6 7 2 3 8 15 4 1 5 21 12 6 13 22 3 7 2423 212019 14 171615 20 16 8 25 15 7 24 14 23 13 22 19 12 18 11 17 109 6 14 22 15 23 8 16 24 9 25 10 18 26 11 17 19 27 12 20 28 13 21 29 7 19 11 18 4 17 10 16 9 15 8 22 14 21 13 6 20 12 5 18 22 12 8 26 19 23 11 7 20 24 14 10 6 16 21 25 13 9 5 KATIE LOOPLANE RAE LOOP LANA R A E L O O P PETAL L A N E SHUB A T A D R I V E CAMD E N L A N E AMO R Y D R I V E KINNEY LANE PETAL LANE SHUBATA DRIVE CAMDEN LANE AMORY DRIVE GUNN RIDGE DRIVEWEDDINGTON ROAD RISI DRIVE QUIN L A N D R I V EMATHER PARKWAYMAJOR COLLECTORMATCHLINEMATCHLINEVICKI LANEKINNEY LANE17 272829 26 3132 30 VICKI LANE5 5 8 2 1 7 6 5 3 23 18 14 18 12 17 13 9 16 10 22 15 19 11 24 23 21 20 1 2 3 4 8 6 7 8 9 1 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 21 19 20 22 1 27 28 12 11 10 6 9 7 5 8 8 7 2 14 13 6 1 3 4 27 2829 32 34 35 36 37 38 39 42 44 45 46 47 49 52 53 2 1 3 21 22 18 17 23 48 50 40 3 2 9 2 10 3 11 4 12 5 13 6 7 8 6 11 9 10 5 12 7 1 20 30 29 28 27 26 31 601 602 504 506 505A 502 503 505 506A 41 33 31 30 LANE RAE L O O P BAL D W I N D R I V E 51 43 5 4 20 15 16 7 17 8 18 9 19 10 1 11 13 14 12 2 3 4 56 12 8 9 10 14 13 11 16 15 14 24 27 4 13 25 26 12 7 11 28 29 30 32 1 9 8 10 2 3 6 5 4 4 76 52 53 54 58 5960 59 62 63 76 72 70 68 66 65 67 69 71 73 74 76 76 75 61 31 BRAXTON DRIVE 20 LEGEND LEGEND TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840 www (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER: PRELIMINARY PLAN NOT FOR RECORD SOUTHERN POINTE SUBDIVISION 552.9 ACRES 2,097 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 8 COMMERCIAL LOTS 1 REC CENTER LOT 1 ATMOS SITE 1 LIFT STATION SITE 1 URBAN/MULTI-FAMILY LOT S D SMITH LEAGUE, A-21 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS, TEXAS SCALE: AS SHOWN AUGUST, 2024SURVEYOR: Nathan Paul Kerr, RPLS No. 6834 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 TBPELS FIRM # 10018500 SECTION 105: 14.061 ACRES - 69 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.022 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 507: 3.304 ACRES - 13 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 109: 3.121 ACRES - 1 COMMERCIAL LOT (0.004 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 600: 16.024 ACRES - 85 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.862 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 117: 7.581 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.973 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 601: 18.887 ACRES - 101 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.226 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 203: 23.589 ACRES - 129 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.678 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 602: 17.548 ACRES - 64 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.286 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 402: 17.174 ACRES - 1 URBAN/MF LOT (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 603: 6.760 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (6.760 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 403B: 0.465 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.264 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 603A: 5.191 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 500: 11.218 ACRES - 58 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.419 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 700: 18.080 ACRES - 88 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.409 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 501: 17.487 ACRES - 87 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.344 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 701: 12.804 ACRES - 59 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.321 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 502: 6.048 ACRES - 34 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.134 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 702: 3.279 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (3.279 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 503: 19.460 ACRES - 106 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (1.146 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 702A: 10.423 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 504: 22.971 ACRES - 96 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.392 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 800: 8.642 ACRES - 50 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.342 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 505: 1.422 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (1.422 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 801: 18.398 ACRES - 100 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.627 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 505A: 5.458 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 802: 22.365 ACRES - 108 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.507 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 506: 0.473 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.473 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 803: 12.211 ACRES - 69 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.344 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 506A: 1.168 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SAVE AND EXCEPT SECTION 100: 49.184 ACRES - 150 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (6.922 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 119: 4.949 ACRES - 28 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 101: 10.439 ACRES - 57 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.040 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 120: 5.321 ACRES - 29 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 102: 9.899 ACRES - 56 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 200: 26.067 ACRES - 65 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.373 ACRES C.A.) & ATMOS/LIFT STATION SECTION 103: 9.899 ACRES - 56 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 201: 15.764 ACRES - 83 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 104: 6.675 ACRES - 36 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.080 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 202: 18.808 ACRES - 97 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.053 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 106: 10.399 ACRES - 57 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.197 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 400: 15.507 ACRES - 67 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.772 ACRES C.A.) & REC CENTER SECTION 111: 5.424 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 401: 12.788 ACRES - 3 COMMERCIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 115: 7.688 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (7.688 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 403: 18.515 ACRES - 4 COMMERCIAL LOTS (0.176 ACRES C.A.) OWNER: Phillips 3 Land Holdings, LLC 1140 Midtown Drive College Station, TX 77845 (979) 255-4466 DEVELOPER: BV Southern Pointe Development, Inc. 1140 Midtown Drive College Station, TX 77845 (979) 255-4466 Page 39 of 223 PARKLAND 1P 802 COMMUNITY PARK 1.70 AC. COMMON AREA I 702 (3.279 ACRE DETENTION POND)COMMON AREA D 803COMMON AREA C 803COMMON AREA B 803COMMON AREA A 803COMMON AREA B 601COMMON AREA B 802 COMMON AREA C 802COMMON AREA A 802COMMON AREA C 801COMMON AREA A 800COMMON AREA C 601 COMMON AREA B 801 COMMON AREA H 603 (6.760 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA C 602 COMMON AREA B 800 COMMON AREA A 801 7 PARKLAND 1P 702A COMMUNITY PARK 10.42 AC. PARKLAND 1P 603A COMMUNITY PARK 5.19 AC. 4444 17 18 15 12 1 30 2 37 7 5 39 9 5 33 35 44 10 1 4 16 14 11 2 7 3 8 13 4 9 5 6 10 41 40 39 38 37 43 36 35 42 34 1 10 7 9 2 11 5 6 4 8 12 33 15 11 22 18 14 10 21 17 13 9 20 16 12 19 33 37 41 34 38 42 35 39 43 36 40 44 1 9 11 10 7 8 6 5 4 2 12 41 9 43 40 38 36 34 33 42 11 176 26 25 24 23 3 1 1918161415457810 22 24 25 2927 12 11 8 6 4 3 2 12 2 26 49 28 678 3 14 8 4 20 35 44 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 11 12 10 GUNN RIDGEDRIVEMARIETTA LOOPLAUREL RIDGE LANEMARIETTA LOOPSEBRING DRIVEROCKFORD DRIVEWEDDINGTON ROADMARIETTA LOOPLAUREL RIDGE LANEMARIETTA LOOPKATIE LOOPWEDDINGTON ROAD RISI DRIVE QUI N L A N D R I V E MINOR COLLECTORMATCHLINE MATCHLINE 16 13 2 5 8 3 23 18 14 18 17 13 16 22 15 19 24 23 21 20 108 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 21 19 20 22 9 8 1 2 3 11 4 12 18 5 136 14 7 17 10 16 15 7 33 6 32 5 31 4 30 3 9 2 8 1 29 28 26 25 24 23 2120191817151413 12 11 10 22 1 6 27 9 10 11 12 13 7 8 6 11 9 10 5 12 13 1 7 9 33 34 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 7 6 5 12 4 11 3 10 2 8 1 33 34 39 35 36 37 38 41 40 42 43 702A 803 802801800 601 603 603A 702 MARIETTA LOOP PARKLAND 1P 602 COMMUNITY PARK 1.09 AC. 7 42 454647 48 49 52 55 5657 55 58 59 42 LEGEND LEGEND TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840 www (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER: PRELIMINARY PLAN NOT FOR RECORD SOUTHERN POINTE SUBDIVISION 552.9 ACRES 2,097 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 8 COMMERCIAL LOTS 1 REC CENTER LOT 1 ATMOS SITE 1 LIFT STATION SITE 1 URBAN/MULTI-FAMILY LOT S D SMITH LEAGUE, A-21 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS, TEXAS SCALE: AS SHOWN AUGUST, 2024SURVEYOR: Nathan Paul Kerr, RPLS No. 6834 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 TBPELS FIRM # 10018500 SECTION 105: 14.061 ACRES - 69 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.022 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 507: 3.304 ACRES - 13 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 109: 3.121 ACRES - 1 COMMERCIAL LOT (0.004 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 600: 16.024 ACRES - 85 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.862 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 117: 7.581 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.973 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 601: 18.887 ACRES - 101 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.226 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 203: 23.589 ACRES - 129 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.678 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 602: 17.548 ACRES - 64 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.286 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 402: 17.174 ACRES - 1 URBAN/MF LOT (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 603: 6.760 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (6.760 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 403B: 0.465 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.264 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 603A: 5.191 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 500: 11.218 ACRES - 58 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.419 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 700: 18.080 ACRES - 88 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.409 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 501: 17.487 ACRES - 87 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.344 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 701: 12.804 ACRES - 59 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.321 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 502: 6.048 ACRES - 34 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.134 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 702: 3.279 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (3.279 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 503: 19.460 ACRES - 106 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (1.146 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 702A: 10.423 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 504: 22.971 ACRES - 96 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.392 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 800: 8.642 ACRES - 50 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.342 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 505: 1.422 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (1.422 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 801: 18.398 ACRES - 100 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.627 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 505A: 5.458 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 802: 22.365 ACRES - 108 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.507 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 506: 0.473 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.473 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 803: 12.211 ACRES - 69 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.344 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 506A: 1.168 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SAVE AND EXCEPT SECTION 100: 49.184 ACRES - 150 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (6.922 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 119: 4.949 ACRES - 28 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 101: 10.439 ACRES - 57 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.040 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 120: 5.321 ACRES - 29 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 102: 9.899 ACRES - 56 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 200: 26.067 ACRES - 65 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.373 ACRES C.A.) & ATMOS/LIFT STATION SECTION 103: 9.899 ACRES - 56 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 201: 15.764 ACRES - 83 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 104: 6.675 ACRES - 36 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.080 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 202: 18.808 ACRES - 97 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.053 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 106: 10.399 ACRES - 57 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.197 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 400: 15.507 ACRES - 67 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.772 ACRES C.A.) & REC CENTER SECTION 111: 5.424 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 401: 12.788 ACRES - 3 COMMERCIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 115: 7.688 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (7.688 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 403: 18.515 ACRES - 4 COMMERCIAL LOTS (0.176 ACRES C.A.) OWNER: Phillips 3 Land Holdings, LLC 1140 Midtown Drive College Station, TX 77845 (979) 255-4466 DEVELOPER: BV Southern Pointe Development, Inc. 1140 Midtown Drive College Station, TX 77845 (979) 255-4466 Page 40 of 223 COMMON AR E A A 5 0 0COMMON AREA C 115(7.688 ACRE DETENTION POND)COMMON AREA C 500COMMO N A R E A B 4 0 0 AND PA E COM M O N A R E A H 4 0 0COMMON AREA B 200COMMON AREA A 200COMMON AREA A 200(2.293 ACRE DETENTION POND)COMMO N A R EA A 4 0 0 , PrD E , AND PAE 22DARLINGTON AVENUEKENNESAW DRIVENATCHEZ DRIVESOUTHERN POINTE PARKWAYMATCHLINEMATCHLINE23717181920161918417103169281222162059221314151718171819201612182120197121110981615211320101181219181716411623147136125111039211581514111091314241692382215721146201351912426181125171027KINNEY LANESH 6 S FRONTAGE RD E TEXAS WORLD SPEEDWAYSH 6 NSH 6 S MATCHLINE1422151617181920211312VERONA DRIVE2423252612111724COMMERCIALBLOCK 81 LOT 23.45 AC.COMMERCIALBLOCK 81 LOT 11.96 AC.COMMERCIALBLOCK 81 LOT 37.37 AC.BLOCK 82 LOT 33.00 AC.COMMERCIALBLOCK 82 LOT 11.67 AC.PARKLAND 1P 500NEIGHBORHOOD PARK0.22 AC.PARKLAND 1P 200NEIGHBORHOOD PARK5.95 AC.23COMMERCIALBLOCK 82 LOT 21.77 AC.18822/11740118287/14850020117939/27411518287/14820020017135/2115234612421COMMON AREA A 40326282725636466798182LEGEND LEGENDTBPE NO. 12327911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.College Station, Texas 77840www(979) 764-3900ENGINEER:PRELIMINARY PLANNOT FOR RECORDSOUTHERN POINTE SUBDIVISION552.9 ACRES 2,097 RESIDENTIAL LOTS8 COMMERCIAL LOTS1 REC CENTER LOT1 ATMOS SITE1 LIFT STATION SITE1 URBAN/MULTI-FAMILY LOTS D SMITH LEAGUE, A-21COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS, TEXASSCALE: AS SHOWNAUGUST, 2024SURVEYOR:Nathan Paul Kerr, RPLS No. 6834Kerr Surveying, LLC409 N. Texas Ave.Bryan, TX 77803(979) 268-3195TBPELS FIRM # 10018500SECTION 105: 14.061 ACRES - 69 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.022 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 507: 3.304 ACRES - 13 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 109: 3.121 ACRES - 1 COMMERCIAL LOT (0.004 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 600: 16.024 ACRES - 85 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.862 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 117: 7.581 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.973 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 601: 18.887 ACRES - 101 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.226 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 203: 23.589 ACRES - 129 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.678 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 602: 17.548 ACRES - 64 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.286 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 402: 17.174 ACRES - 1 URBAN/MF LOT (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 603: 6.760 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (6.760 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 403B: 0.465 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.264 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 603A: 5.191 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 500: 11.218 ACRES - 58 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.419 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 700: 18.080 ACRES - 88 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.409 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 501: 17.487 ACRES - 87 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.344 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 701: 12.804 ACRES - 59 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.321 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 502: 6.048 ACRES - 34 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.134 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 702: 3.279 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (3.279 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 503: 19.460 ACRES - 106 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (1.146 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 702A: 10.423 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 504: 22.971 ACRES - 96 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.392 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 800: 8.642 ACRES - 50 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.342 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 505: 1.422 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (1.422 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 801: 18.398 ACRES - 100 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.627 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 505A: 5.458 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 802: 22.365 ACRES - 108 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.507 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 506: 0.473 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.473 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 803: 12.211 ACRES - 69 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.344 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 506A: 1.168 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SAVE AND EXCEPTSECTION 100: 49.184 ACRES - 150 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (6.922 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 119: 4.949 ACRES - 28 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 101: 10.439 ACRES - 57 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.040 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 120: 5.321 ACRES - 29 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 102: 9.899 ACRES - 56 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 200: 26.067 ACRES - 65 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.373 ACRES C.A.) &ATMOS/LIFT STATIONSECTION 103: 9.899 ACRES - 56 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 201: 15.764 ACRES - 83 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 104: 6.675 ACRES - 36 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.080 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 202: 18.808 ACRES - 97 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.053 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 106: 10.399 ACRES - 57 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.197 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 400: 15.507 ACRES - 67 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.772 ACRES C.A.) &REC CENTERSECTION 111: 5.424 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 401: 12.788 ACRES - 3 COMMERCIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 115: 7.688 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (7.688 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 403: 18.515 ACRES - 4 COMMERCIAL LOTS (0.176 ACRES C.A.)OWNER:Phillips 3 Land Holdings, LLC1140 Midtown DriveCollege Station, TX 77845(979) 255-4466DEVELOPER:BV Southern Pointe Development, Inc.1140 Midtown DriveCollege Station, TX 77845(979) 255-4466Page 41 of 223 COMMON AREA A 6001COMMON AREA A 203COMMON AREA B 203COMMON AREA C 400AND REC CENTER2.33 ACRES35COMMON AREA C 503 1COMMON AREA G 400 AND PUE COMMON AREA E 400 AND PUECOMMON AREA F 400 AND PUE COMMON AREA B 400AND PAECOMMON AREA H 400 COMMONAREA C 203COMMON AREA B 200COMMON AREA A 700COMMON AREA C 700COMMON AREA A 202COMMON AREA D 400 AND PUECOMMON AREA A 400,PrDE, AND PAE11 PARKLAND 1P 400NEIGHBORHOOD PARK1.07 AC.302733DARLINGTON AVENUEPATRIOT DRIVEKENNESAW DRIVENATCHEZ DRIVEMATCHLINEMATCHLINEMATCHLINE2171525423191615207892428272621232219222520327141527282930313233263413191816142224171615141918217381249510621126101212111514183829345671141213131516171924231620142117221326121825121116491710185167238159719111841710169158221421136201251321181618202324252627282930313211365321614157164812592103331112459176101427118181114171913101222910112524723615185211794161182031921021543211234192092225262531232430292826282723132614151718192017291819220222324162122511218212019765124113109816155211324620310472211181219181716416147136125111039211581514111091314AMORY DRIVEKINNEY LANEQUINLAN DRIVESAMANTHA LANEGUNN RIDGE DRIVEDAYTONA DRIVE ELDORA DRIVE CANTON DRIVEVERONA DRIVEPATRIOT DRIVEKENNESAW DRIVESOUTHERN POINTE PARKWAYMATHER PARKWAY 81376541716151410121191011149121381576191817231622212018231419152016211722837211610594144035363422151617181920211312CANTON DRIVEVERONA DRIVEVERONA DRIVEWATKINS WAYVICKI LANE 5COMMON AREA A 50 3 342322423292526281029876512411312411171331291531314214921031141251367811910121371412230292827262524231921201718312333132302928272625242322212019161514131211109843111121314151617181920212223245671082540018633/13020117939/27420220360011120017135/2115234678101113738394243411817BALDWIN DRIVE203262829272735363738394450515263636665417880797979LEGEND LEGENDTBPE NO. 12327911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.College Station, Texas 77840www(979) 764-3900ENGINEER:PRELIMINARY PLANNOT FOR RECORDSOUTHERN POINTE SUBDIVISION552.9 ACRES 2,097 RESIDENTIAL LOTS8 COMMERCIAL LOTS1 REC CENTER LOT1 ATMOS SITE1 LIFT STATION SITE1 URBAN/MULTI-FAMILY LOTS D SMITH LEAGUE, A-21COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS, TEXASSCALE: AS SHOWNAUGUST, 2024SURVEYOR:Nathan Paul Kerr, RPLS No. 6834Kerr Surveying, LLC409 N. Texas Ave.Bryan, TX 77803(979) 268-3195TBPELS FIRM # 10018500SECTION 105: 14.061 ACRES - 69 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.022 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 507: 3.304 ACRES - 13 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 109: 3.121 ACRES - 1 COMMERCIAL LOT (0.004 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 600: 16.024 ACRES - 85 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.862 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 117: 7.581 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.973 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 601: 18.887 ACRES - 101 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.226 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 203: 23.589 ACRES - 129 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.678 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 602: 17.548 ACRES - 64 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.286 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 402: 17.174 ACRES - 1 URBAN/MF LOT (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 603: 6.760 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (6.760 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 403B: 0.465 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.264 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 603A: 5.191 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 500: 11.218 ACRES - 58 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.419 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 700: 18.080 ACRES - 88 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.409 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 501: 17.487 ACRES - 87 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.344 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 701: 12.804 ACRES - 59 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.321 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 502: 6.048 ACRES - 34 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.134 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 702: 3.279 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (3.279 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 503: 19.460 ACRES - 106 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (1.146 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 702A: 10.423 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 504: 22.971 ACRES - 96 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.392 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 800: 8.642 ACRES - 50 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.342 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 505: 1.422 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (1.422 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 801: 18.398 ACRES - 100 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.627 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 505A: 5.458 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 802: 22.365 ACRES - 108 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.507 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 506: 0.473 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.473 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 803: 12.211 ACRES - 69 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.344 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 506A: 1.168 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SAVE AND EXCEPTSECTION 100: 49.184 ACRES - 150 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (6.922 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 119: 4.949 ACRES - 28 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 101: 10.439 ACRES - 57 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.040 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 120: 5.321 ACRES - 29 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 102: 9.899 ACRES - 56 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 200: 26.067 ACRES - 65 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.373 ACRES C.A.) &ATMOS/LIFT STATIONSECTION 103: 9.899 ACRES - 56 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 201: 15.764 ACRES - 83 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 104: 6.675 ACRES - 36 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.080 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 202: 18.808 ACRES - 97 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.053 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 106: 10.399 ACRES - 57 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.197 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 400: 15.507 ACRES - 67 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.772 ACRES C.A.) &REC CENTERSECTION 111: 5.424 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 401: 12.788 ACRES - 3 COMMERCIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 115: 7.688 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (7.688 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 403: 18.515 ACRES - 4 COMMERCIAL LOTS (0.176 ACRES C.A.)OWNER:Phillips 3 Land Holdings, LLC1140 Midtown DriveCollege Station, TX 77845(979) 255-4466DEVELOPER:BV Southern Pointe Development, Inc.1140 Midtown DriveCollege Station, TX 77845(979) 255-4466Page 42 of 223 COMMON AREA B 106 COMMON AREA D 802 COMMON AREA A 701COMMON AREA E 7001 COMMON AREA C 203 COMMON AREA B 802 COMMON AREA C 802COMMON AREA A 802COMMON AREA C 801COMMON AREA A 800COMMON AREA C 601 COMMON AREA B 801 COMMON AREA A 106 COMM O N A R E A A 7 0 0 COMMON AREA C 700 COMMON AREA D 700COMMON AREA B 800 COMMON AREA A 801 COMMON AREA C 800COMMON AREA D 80142 MATCHLINE 37 17 17 12 15 4 25 4 23 21 16 15 207 8 9 26 19 30 15 18 9 21 28 11 12 11 1019 38 3641 2817 13 3510 19 14 16 15 13 18 17 19 18 16 10 14 13 16 14 30 38 37 36 26 35 34 17 40 39 37 23 24 22 31 10 7 9 29 27 25 21 20 18 11 8 12 33 3213 33 22 18 21 17 20 19 33 37 23 29 34 24 25 35 31 32 36 27 20 19 18 13 16 15 14 9 11 10 8 31 22 12 27 9 36 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 24 26 25 23 23 12 4 17 11 3 16 10 15 2 22 14 8 1 21 13 7 20 6 24 19 5 18 22 24 12 1 13 17 16 15 14 19 18 17 20 23 19 15 18 14 21 15 23 20 14 22 16 19 21 7 3 2 8 12 4 9 5 10 6 2 11 26 10 12 12 11 12 3 8 24 9 13 16 5 10 22 1 11 6 7 12 11 8 14 8 22 21 20 18 19 17 16 15 14 17 18 13 6 5 3 2 1 18 11 14 17 19 13 10 16 10 17 18 11 12 13 1415 33 11 3 10 2 9 8 7 6 5 12 4 1 29 31323534 17 23 22 21 20 19 18 16 28 26 25 24 23 19 20 13 21 14 22 15 23 16 24 17 18 9 1 18 8 24 17 7 16 6 15 5 22 14 4 21 13 11 3 20 12 10 2 19 10 13 14 13 19 12 1118 10 17 16 15 15 17 11 12 14 16 18 19 11 19 15 16 17 13 12 10 14 18 5 9 24 20 16 2 6 10 23 19 15 3 7 11 22 18 14 4 8 13 21 17 2 15314413567 17101169 35 8 8 9 11 18 20 19 25 26 32 12 13 10 GUNN RIDGEDRIVEMARIETTA LOOPLAUREL RIDGE LANEMARIETTA LOOPSEBRING DRIVEROCKFORD DRIVEQUIN L A N D R I V E SAM A N T H A L A N E GUN N R I D G E D R I V E ELDORA DRIVE ELDORA DRIVEPOCONO DRIVEWILKESBORO DRIVETALLADEGA DRIVESOUTHERN CROSS DRIVEROCKFORD DRIVEDAYTONA DRIVEPATRIOT DRIVE SOUTHERN POINTE PARKWAY MINOR ARTERIAL MINOR COLLECTORMATCHLINE 27 36 19 18 17 23 16 22 21 20 12 10 13 14 11 15 30ROXIE LANEPARKLAND 1P 106 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 0.54 AC. 9 10 11 12 13 7 8 11 9 10 12 13 1 7 15 14 9 16 22 24 23 19 21 20 17 18 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 26 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 22 23 2421 27 17 28 16 29 15 30 14 31 33 34 36 37 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 32 22 14 21 13 20 19 12 18 11 17 10 16 15 8 33 34 35 36 37 1716915814131211107432165 35 34 23 25 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 802801800 106 18712/184 701700 24 24 11 12 203 13 30313233343536 40 42 43 44 454647 48 49 50 51 52 LEGEND LEGEND TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840 www (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER: PRELIMINARY PLAN NOT FOR RECORD SOUTHERN POINTE SUBDIVISION 552.9 ACRES 2,097 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 8 COMMERCIAL LOTS 1 REC CENTER LOT 1 ATMOS SITE 1 LIFT STATION SITE 1 URBAN/MULTI-FAMILY LOT S D SMITH LEAGUE, A-21 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS, TEXAS SCALE: AS SHOWN AUGUST, 2024SURVEYOR: Nathan Paul Kerr, RPLS No. 6834 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 TBPELS FIRM # 10018500 SECTION 105: 14.061 ACRES - 69 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.022 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 507: 3.304 ACRES - 13 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 109: 3.121 ACRES - 1 COMMERCIAL LOT (0.004 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 600: 16.024 ACRES - 85 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.862 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 117: 7.581 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.973 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 601: 18.887 ACRES - 101 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.226 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 203: 23.589 ACRES - 129 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.678 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 602: 17.548 ACRES - 64 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.286 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 402: 17.174 ACRES - 1 URBAN/MF LOT (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 603: 6.760 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (6.760 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 403B: 0.465 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.264 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 603A: 5.191 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 500: 11.218 ACRES - 58 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.419 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 700: 18.080 ACRES - 88 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.409 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 501: 17.487 ACRES - 87 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.344 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 701: 12.804 ACRES - 59 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.321 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 502: 6.048 ACRES - 34 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.134 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 702: 3.279 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (3.279 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 503: 19.460 ACRES - 106 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (1.146 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 702A: 10.423 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 504: 22.971 ACRES - 96 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.392 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 800: 8.642 ACRES - 50 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.342 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 505: 1.422 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (1.422 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 801: 18.398 ACRES - 100 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.627 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 505A: 5.458 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 802: 22.365 ACRES - 108 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.507 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 506: 0.473 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.473 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 803: 12.211 ACRES - 69 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.344 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 506A: 1.168 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SAVE AND EXCEPT SECTION 100: 49.184 ACRES - 150 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (6.922 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 119: 4.949 ACRES - 28 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 101: 10.439 ACRES - 57 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.040 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 120: 5.321 ACRES - 29 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 102: 9.899 ACRES - 56 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 200: 26.067 ACRES - 65 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.373 ACRES C.A.) & ATMOS/LIFT STATION SECTION 103: 9.899 ACRES - 56 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 201: 15.764 ACRES - 83 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 104: 6.675 ACRES - 36 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.080 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 202: 18.808 ACRES - 97 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.053 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 106: 10.399 ACRES - 57 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.197 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 400: 15.507 ACRES - 67 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.772 ACRES C.A.) & REC CENTER SECTION 111: 5.424 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 401: 12.788 ACRES - 3 COMMERCIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 115: 7.688 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (7.688 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 403: 18.515 ACRES - 4 COMMERCIAL LOTS (0.176 ACRES C.A.) OWNER: Phillips 3 Land Holdings, LLC 1140 Midtown Drive College Station, TX 77845 (979) 255-4466 DEVELOPER: BV Southern Pointe Development, Inc. 1140 Midtown Drive College Station, TX 77845 (979) 255-4466 Page 43 of 223 11COMMON AREA B 203COMMON ARE A B 104 CO M M O N A R E A A 1 0 4 CO M M O N A R E A 1 A 1 0 0 COMMON AREA A 200 (2.293 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA C117 (2.973 ACRE DETENTION POND) COM M O N A REA A 105COMMON AREA A 202PARKLAND 1P 120 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 0.17 AC. PARKLAND 1P 105 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 1.04 AC. DA R L I N G T O N A V E N U E NAT C H E Z D R I V E DARLINGTON AVENUE ELDORA DRIVEMATCHLINE1 21 3 10 7 27 28 29 30 31 26 7 17 12 22 9 23 68 12 17 13 15 14 16 18 1 2 22 3 5 24 6 20 25 7 8 26 9 10 27 11 25 24 23 15 18 21 17 16 11 20 19 10 9 8 6 7 2 1 5 4 3 21 8 1 9 2 10 16 3 17 4 18 5 19 6 20 2 5 4 35 36 37 38 33 32 31 30 29 34 28 16 1 3 2 6 10 4 1 9 4 3 2 8 7 6 13 5 2 1 8 25 9 24 23 22 12 27 11 19 10 7 13 6 12 5 11 10 9 8 4 3 24 21 20 19 18 17 14 15 22 23 27 26 23 2 7 6 5 4 3 8 26 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 23 24 16 21 2 25 112 7 6 5 4 3 10 9 8 22 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 11 10 9 28 29 30 38 37 36 35 34 33 40 32 39 31 27 13 16 15 19 18 15 14 11 12 17 16 LIFT STATION SITE 2 32 28 25 21 17 6 9 13 31 24 20 3 7 10 14 30 23 19 4 8 11 15 29 26 22 18 1 5 12 16 33 18 19 ATMOS SITE 2 KEN N E S A W D R I V E GREENVILLE DRIVETRADO DRIVERALEIGH DRIVETRADO DRIVEPROMENADE DRIVEFULTON DRIVER A L E I G H L O O PMATHER PARKWAYELDORA DRIVERALEIGH DRIVEM A J O R A R T E R I A L 1 3 4 5 6 7 33 32 31 30 28 G A I N E S V I L L E D R I V E 21 20 27 12 11 15 14 13 COMMERCIAL BLOCK 25 LOT 41 1.67 AC. 4 PARKLAND 1P 117 NIEGHBORHOOD PARK 4.61 AC. PARKLAND 1P 104 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 0.22 AC. PARKLAND 2P 100 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 0.04 AC. 5 7 12 11 9 8 14 13 15 18 17 1626 29 34 10 11 12 27 23 22 21 20 19 14 16 15 24 26 25 13 14 202 19112/143 120 18188/212 104 18188/212 105 117 200 109 1 COMMON AREA A 109 203 7 88 9 10 11 83 12 21 22 23 24 25 26 28 37 8 LEGEND LEGEND TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840 www (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER: PRELIMINARY PLAN NOT FOR RECORD SOUTHERN POINTE SUBDIVISION 552.9 ACRES 2,097 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 8 COMMERCIAL LOTS 1 REC CENTER LOT 1 ATMOS SITE 1 LIFT STATION SITE 1 URBAN/MULTI-FAMILY LOT S D SMITH LEAGUE, A-21 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS, TEXAS SCALE: AS SHOWN AUGUST, 2024SURVEYOR: Nathan Paul Kerr, RPLS No. 6834 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 TBPELS FIRM # 10018500 SECTION 105: 14.061 ACRES - 69 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.022 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 507: 3.304 ACRES - 13 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 109: 3.121 ACRES - 1 COMMERCIAL LOT (0.004 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 600: 16.024 ACRES - 85 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.862 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 117: 7.581 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.973 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 601: 18.887 ACRES - 101 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.226 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 203: 23.589 ACRES - 129 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.678 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 602: 17.548 ACRES - 64 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.286 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 402: 17.174 ACRES - 1 URBAN/MF LOT (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 603: 6.760 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (6.760 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 403B: 0.465 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.264 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 603A: 5.191 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 500: 11.218 ACRES - 58 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.419 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 700: 18.080 ACRES - 88 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.409 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 501: 17.487 ACRES - 87 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.344 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 701: 12.804 ACRES - 59 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.321 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 502: 6.048 ACRES - 34 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.134 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 702: 3.279 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (3.279 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 503: 19.460 ACRES - 106 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (1.146 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 702A: 10.423 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 504: 22.971 ACRES - 96 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.392 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 800: 8.642 ACRES - 50 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.342 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 505: 1.422 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (1.422 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 801: 18.398 ACRES - 100 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.627 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 505A: 5.458 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 802: 22.365 ACRES - 108 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.507 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 506: 0.473 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.473 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 803: 12.211 ACRES - 69 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.344 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 506A: 1.168 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SAVE AND EXCEPT SECTION 100: 49.184 ACRES - 150 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (6.922 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 119: 4.949 ACRES - 28 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 101: 10.439 ACRES - 57 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.040 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 120: 5.321 ACRES - 29 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 102: 9.899 ACRES - 56 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 200: 26.067 ACRES - 65 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.373 ACRES C.A.) & ATMOS/LIFT STATION SECTION 103: 9.899 ACRES - 56 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 201: 15.764 ACRES - 83 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 104: 6.675 ACRES - 36 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.080 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 202: 18.808 ACRES - 97 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.053 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 106: 10.399 ACRES - 57 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.197 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 400: 15.507 ACRES - 67 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.772 ACRES C.A.) & REC CENTER SECTION 111: 5.424 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 401: 12.788 ACRES - 3 COMMERCIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 115: 7.688 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (7.688 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 403: 18.515 ACRES - 4 COMMERCIAL LOTS (0.176 ACRES C.A.) OWNER: Phillips 3 Land Holdings, LLC 1140 Midtown Drive College Station, TX 77845 (979) 255-4466 DEVELOPER: BV Southern Pointe Development, Inc. 1140 Midtown Drive College Station, TX 77845 (979) 255-4466 Page 44 of 223 COMMON AREA 1A 101COMMON AREA D 100(6.627 ACRE DETENTION POND)COMMON AREA 1E 100COMMON AREA 1B 100COMMON AREA 1C 100COMMON AREA 1D 100 ELDORA DRIVEDAYTONA DRIVEROCKFORD DRIVESOUTHERN CROSS DRIVE DARLINGTON AVENUEMATCHLINEMATCHLINE 1712151615242325132329328262782565288111122334457987126119106591987665432175984262519212414232722162126201513281817192818272316222621201025142413128418117314171921310912022276271817522162310172418111213201421152102021272223282425132627211420132619121125181024172823162215151711766542112735914841618192311282219212720126152516241721312310914818113172921911172416641013857242225121114131518964710151519141112141510141518232221201918161725910678914512213112364587109212019181716151413121514131211109765432206216242812521251884112226732327113173812161WILKESBORO DRIVE TALLADEGA DRIVE ROCKFORD DRIVEDAYTONA DRIVEELDORA DRIVESOUTHERN CROSS DRIVE PIPELINE RDSTAUFFER CRELDORA DRIVE POCONO DRIVESPARTAN DRIVE124836910271513141115PARKLAND 1P 100NEIGHBORHOOD PARK10.57 AC.PARKLAND 1P 101NEIGHBORHOOD PARK0.53 AC.10318123/23311918123/23310217710/9310117135/18010015287/51203123344561314151617181920LEGEND LEGENDTBPE NO. 12327911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.College Station, Texas 77840www(979) 764-3900ENGINEER:PRELIMINARY PLANNOT FOR RECORDSOUTHERN POINTE SUBDIVISION552.9 ACRES 2,097 RESIDENTIAL LOTS8 COMMERCIAL LOTS1 REC CENTER LOT1 ATMOS SITE1 LIFT STATION SITE1 URBAN/MULTI-FAMILY LOTS D SMITH LEAGUE, A-21COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS, TEXASSCALE: AS SHOWNAUGUST, 2024SURVEYOR:Nathan Paul Kerr, RPLS No. 6834Kerr Surveying, LLC409 N. Texas Ave.Bryan, TX 77803(979) 268-3195TBPELS FIRM # 10018500SECTION 105: 14.061 ACRES - 69 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.022 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 507: 3.304 ACRES - 13 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 109: 3.121 ACRES - 1 COMMERCIAL LOT (0.004 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 600: 16.024 ACRES - 85 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.862 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 117: 7.581 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.973 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 601: 18.887 ACRES - 101 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.226 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 203: 23.589 ACRES - 129 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.678 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 602: 17.548 ACRES - 64 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.286 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 402: 17.174 ACRES - 1 URBAN/MF LOT (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 603: 6.760 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (6.760 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 403B: 0.465 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.264 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 603A: 5.191 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 500: 11.218 ACRES - 58 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.419 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 700: 18.080 ACRES - 88 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.409 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 501: 17.487 ACRES - 87 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.344 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 701: 12.804 ACRES - 59 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.321 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 502: 6.048 ACRES - 34 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.134 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 702: 3.279 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (3.279 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 503: 19.460 ACRES - 106 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (1.146 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 702A: 10.423 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 504: 22.971 ACRES - 96 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.392 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 800: 8.642 ACRES - 50 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.342 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 505: 1.422 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (1.422 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 801: 18.398 ACRES - 100 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.627 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 505A: 5.458 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 802: 22.365 ACRES - 108 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.507 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 506: 0.473 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.473 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 803: 12.211 ACRES - 69 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.344 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 506A: 1.168 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SAVE AND EXCEPTSECTION 100: 49.184 ACRES - 150 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (6.922 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 119: 4.949 ACRES - 28 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 101: 10.439 ACRES - 57 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.040 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 120: 5.321 ACRES - 29 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 102: 9.899 ACRES - 56 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 200: 26.067 ACRES - 65 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.373 ACRES C.A.) &ATMOS/LIFT STATIONSECTION 103: 9.899 ACRES - 56 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 201: 15.764 ACRES - 83 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 104: 6.675 ACRES - 36 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.080 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 202: 18.808 ACRES - 97 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.053 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 106: 10.399 ACRES - 57 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.197 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 400: 15.507 ACRES - 67 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.772 ACRES C.A.) &REC CENTERSECTION 111: 5.424 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 401: 12.788 ACRES - 3 COMMERCIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 115: 7.688 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (7.688 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 403: 18.515 ACRES - 4 COMMERCIAL LOTS (0.176 ACRES C.A.)OWNER:Phillips 3 Land Holdings, LLC1140 Midtown DriveCollege Station, TX 77845(979) 255-4466DEVELOPER:BV Southern Pointe Development, Inc.1140 Midtown DriveCollege Station, TX 77845(979) 255-4466Page 45 of 223 PHASE 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 504 BLOCK 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 67 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 LOT 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 AREA (SF) 5,694 5,690 5,681 5,668 5,649 5,673 5,703 6,633 6,617 5,797 5,829 5,857 5,836 5,822 5,813 5,810 5,813 5,807 6,454 6,012 6,066 6,066 6,063 6,056 6,045 6,031 6,013 5,951 6,826 6,365 5,796 5,840 5,860 5,845 5,833 5,825 5,820 5,819 5,822 5,827 6,662 5,747 5,615 5,647 7,431 5,847 5,837 5,830 5,824 5,820 5,818 5,819 5,821 7,949 7,020 5,804 5,806 5,807 5,932 6,126 6,450 6,759 7,157 7,564 5,804 5,804 6,679 7,436 5,962 5,961 5,961 5,799 5,799 5,799 9,284 7,315 5,792 5,792 5,792 6,516 5,997 7,097 6,005 6,587 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,495 12,424 8,110 7,638 7,074 6,569 6,269 6,089 5,937 6,143 5,796 5,796 5,796 6,843 7,443 5,939 5,939 5,939 5,839 5,915 6,020 6,269 PHASE 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 BLOCK 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 LOT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 AREA (SF) 7,425 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 7,425 6,754 5,736 6,363 11,751 6,377 5,535 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,649 6,184 7,845 6,341 5,572 6,777 6,742 5,865 5,865 5,865 5,865 5,865 5,865 5,865 5,865 5,865 5,865 5,865 5,790 5,789 9,762 9,592 6,623 5,199 5,871 5,876 5,876 5,876 5,876 5,876 5,876 5,876 5,876 5,876 6,741 6,772 5,886 5,886 5,886 5,886 5,886 5,886 5,886 5,886 5,886 6,469 6,213 9,073 9,560 6,728 5,688 5,900 5,901 5,901 5,901 5,901 5,901 5,901 5,901 6,771 6,809 5,972 5,972 5,972 5,972 5,972 5,972 5,972 5,972 5,972 6,016 5,669 7,669 8,935 5,951 6,099 PHASE 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 BLOCK 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 20 20 20 20 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 37 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 41 LOT 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 15 16 17 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 1 AREA (SF) 5,944 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 9,988 6,587 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,667 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,588 9,988 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,004 6,004 6,004 6,004 8,256 6,588 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,132 6,129 9,797 7,638 6,021 6,021 6,021 6,279 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,587 9,103 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,686 8,444 8,484 6,611 6,717 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,587 10,096 PHASE 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 BLOCK 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 37 37 37 37 37 LOT 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 18 19 20 21 22 AREA (SF) 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,040 6,178 6,178 8,427 7,772 6,122 6,122 6,122 5,892 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 7,392 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,587 11,334 8,280 7,974 7,860 8,142 8,866 7,198 7,374 7,550 7,726 15,644 11,096 5,899 5,837 5,749 5,801 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 7,163 6,600 5,738 5,746 5,750 5,750 5,605 7,030 16,213 9,950 5,751 5,751 5,751 5,751 5,751 5,750 5,750 6,276 7,829 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,770 5,719 5,703 10,581 6,977 5,882 5,890 5,866 5,804 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,588 7,162 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,545 5,545 5,545 8,641 6,725 5,944 5,944 5,944 5,944 PHASE 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 BLOCK 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 29 29 29 LOT 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 2 3 AREA (SF) 5,754 5,752 5,751 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,633 6,633 6,633 6,511 6,255 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 7,319 9,158 7,048 6,952 6,856 6,760 6,663 6,567 6,471 6,366 11,225 7,088 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,554 8,334 6,182 5,850 5,946 6,042 6,138 6,234 6,329 6,425 6,521 6,617 8,966 7,320 6,064 6,064 6,064 6,064 5,819 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 7,122 7,163 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,978 6,241 7,956 9,684 7,539 6,433 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 7,163 9,102 5,750 5,750 PHASE 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 BLOCK 13 13 13 13 13 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 8 8 8 8 8 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 LOT 32 33 34 35 36 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 AREA (SF) 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 6,689 6,588 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,587 6,587 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,588 6,587 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,525 6,587 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,587 6,587 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,587 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 7,098 6,129 6,126 6,076 5,794 5,794 5,794 5,794 5,794 5,794 5,794 5,794 8,752 8,668 5,802 5,802 5,802 5,802 5,802 5,802 5,802 6,137 6,412 7,040 7,694 5,771 5,769 5,768 5,766 5,765 5,763 5,762 5,760 5,759 5,757 5,755 PHASE 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 106 BLOCK 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 LOT 29 30 31 32 33 2 3 4 5 6 7 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 23 26 27 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 AREA (SF) 5,991 5,991 5,991 5,991 7,868 5,761 5,759 5,758 5,756 5,754 5,752 10,363 5,957 5,939 5,948 5,948 5,948 5,799 5,799 5,799 6,030 6,106 6,106 6,106 7,060 6,957 5,804 5,804 5,804 5,804 5,803 5,998 9,597 8,942 5,341 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,010 9,232 10,847 6,347 5,564 5,564 5,564 5,564 6,083 7,349 5,808 5,808 5,808 5,808 6,889 6,839 5,799 5,799 5,799 5,799 8,305 7,794 5,771 5,804 5,804 5,804 5,804 5,804 5,804 5,804 7,148 7,000 5,554 5,554 5,554 5,554 5,554 5,554 6,067 8,770 5,808 5,808 5,808 5,808 5,808 5,808 8,494 7,073 5,799 5,799 5,799 5,799 5,799 5,799 5,799 7,575 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,436 12,423 8,731 5,235 5,250 PHASE 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 103 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 BLOCK 15 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 LOT 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AREA (SF) 6,587 6,587 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,587 6,587 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,587 6,587 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,587 6,587 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,587 6,587 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,587 6,587 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,587 6,587 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,587 7,409 5,788 5,788 5,788 5,788 6,795 6,764 5,788 5,791 5,812 5,992 PHASE 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 101 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 102 BLOCK 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 LOT 17 18 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 AREA (SF) 5,768 5,750 6,678 7,408 6,173 6,173 6,173 6,173 6,173 6,173 6,173 6,173 7,564 8,155 6,046 6,046 6,046 6,046 6,046 6,046 6,046 8,171 7,470 6,010 6,010 6,010 6,010 6,010 6,010 5,795 6,043 6,029 6,029 6,029 6,029 6,029 6,029 6,029 9,937 7,871 6,588 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,749 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,587 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,587 6,587 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,587 6,587 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,587 6,587 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 PHASE 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 BLOCK 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 24 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 72 72 72 72 LOT 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 1 20 21 22 AREA (SF) 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,367 7,049 6,821 5,209 5,322 5,997 6,826 5,697 5,689 5,681 5,674 5,668 5,663 5,658 5,655 5,652 5,650 5,649 7,235 6,916 5,859 5,857 5,855 5,852 5,831 5,854 5,835 5,827 5,819 5,803 6,641 5,833 5,827 5,823 5,819 5,817 5,816 5,816 5,817 5,819 5,822 5,827 5,832 6,711 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,782 5,671 5,676 5,680 5,684 5,686 5,688 5,688 5,688 5,687 5,684 5,681 5,677 5,673 7,248 6,825 5,669 5,670 5,671 5,672 5,673 5,673 5,673 5,673 5,673 5,673 5,673 5,672 5,671 5,671 5,670 7,259 6,598 5,835 5,834 5,833 5,832 5,832 5,832 5,831 5,831 5,832 5,832 5,832 5,833 5,834 5,835 7,174 6,597 5,803 5,803 PHASE 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 203 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 BLOCK 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 64 64 LOT 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 13 14 AREA (SF) 5,121 5,125 5,125 5,125 5,125 5,125 7,479 6,873 5,125 5,125 5,125 5,125 5,125 5,125 5,125 5,125 7,989 6,461 6,592 6,614 6,790 6,790 6,614 6,499 5,783 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,721 7,447 5,638 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 6,136 9,674 10,814 5,841 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,695 6,866 11,521 6,857 7,169 7,928 6,184 7,337 6,438 7,231 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,638 5,637 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,666 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,750 5,638 6,404 5,323 5,322 5,322 5,321 5,321 5,321 5,321 5,320 5,750 5,750 PHASE 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 501 502 502 502 502 502 502 502 502 502 502 502 502 502 502 502 502 502 502 502 502 502 502 502 502 502 502 502 502 502 502 502 502 502 502 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 503 BLOCK 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 67 67 67 LOT 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1 2 3 AREA (SF) 5,803 5,803 5,803 5,803 5,803 5,803 5,803 5,803 5,803 5,803 5,803 5,803 5,803 5,803 7,031 6,096 6,168 9,199 14,482 8,725 9,285 10,907 6,684 9,244 5,699 5,699 5,699 5,699 5,699 5,699 5,699 5,699 5,699 5,699 5,699 5,699 5,699 5,699 5,699 5,699 5,699 6,501 5,801 5,801 5,801 5,801 5,801 5,801 5,801 5,801 5,801 5,801 5,801 5,801 5,801 5,801 5,798 6,700 7,100 5,810 5,810 5,810 5,810 5,810 5,810 5,810 5,810 5,810 5,810 5,810 5,810 6,406 5,321 5,321 5,321 5,321 5,322 5,322 6,021 6,472 6,482 6,628 6,628 6,482 6,482 6,028 5,750 5,750 6,734 6,487 5,656 5,656 5,653 5,646 5,636 5,622 5,606 5,715 5,840 5,407 5,891 5,879 5,865 5,856 5,852 5,851 6,695 5,657 5,686 5,692 TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840 www (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER: PRELIMINARY PLAN NOT FOR RECORD SOUTHERN POINTE SUBDIVISION 552.9 ACRES 2,097 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 8 COMMERCIAL LOTS 1 REC CENTER LOT 1 ATMOS SITE 1 LIFT STATION SITE 1 URBAN/MULTI-FAMILY LOT S D SMITH LEAGUE, A-21 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS, TEXAS SCALE: AS SHOWN AUGUST, 2024SURVEYOR: Nathan Paul Kerr, RPLS No. 6834 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 TBPELS FIRM # 10018500 SECTION 105: 14.061 ACRES - 69 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.022 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 507: 3.304 ACRES - 13 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 109: 3.121 ACRES - 1 COMMERCIAL LOT (0.004 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 600: 16.024 ACRES - 85 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.862 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 117: 7.581 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.973 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 601: 18.887 ACRES - 101 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.226 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 203: 23.589 ACRES - 129 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.678 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 602: 17.548 ACRES - 64 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.286 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 402: 17.174 ACRES - 1 URBAN/MF LOT (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 603: 6.760 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (6.760 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 403B: 0.465 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.264 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 603A: 5.191 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 500: 11.218 ACRES - 58 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.419 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 700: 18.080 ACRES - 88 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.409 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 501: 17.487 ACRES - 87 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.344 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 701: 12.804 ACRES - 59 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.321 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 502: 6.048 ACRES - 34 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.134 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 702: 3.279 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (3.279 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 503: 19.460 ACRES - 106 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (1.146 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 702A: 10.423 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 504: 22.971 ACRES - 96 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.392 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 800: 8.642 ACRES - 50 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.342 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 505: 1.422 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (1.422 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 801: 18.398 ACRES - 100 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.627 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 505A: 5.458 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 802: 22.365 ACRES - 108 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.507 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 506: 0.473 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.473 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 803: 12.211 ACRES - 69 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.344 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 506A: 1.168 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SAVE AND EXCEPT SECTION 100: 49.184 ACRES - 150 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (6.922 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 119: 4.949 ACRES - 28 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 101: 10.439 ACRES - 57 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.040 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 120: 5.321 ACRES - 29 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 102: 9.899 ACRES - 56 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 200: 26.067 ACRES - 65 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.373 ACRES C.A.) & ATMOS/LIFT STATION SECTION 103: 9.899 ACRES - 56 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 201: 15.764 ACRES - 83 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 104: 6.675 ACRES - 36 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.080 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 202: 18.808 ACRES - 97 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.053 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 106: 10.399 ACRES - 57 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.197 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 400: 15.507 ACRES - 67 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.772 ACRES C.A.) & REC CENTER SECTION 111: 5.424 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 401: 12.788 ACRES - 3 COMMERCIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 115: 7.688 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (7.688 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 403: 18.515 ACRES - 4 COMMERCIAL LOTS (0.176 ACRES C.A.) OWNER: Phillips 3 Land Holdings, LLC 1140 Midtown Drive College Station, TX 77845 (979) 255-4466 DEVELOPER: BV Southern Pointe Development, Inc. 1140 Midtown Drive College Station, TX 77845 (979) 255-4466 Page 46 of 223 PHASE802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803803BLOCK4545454545454545454545454545454545454545454545454545464646464646464646464646464646464646464646465555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555656565656565656565656565656565656565757575757575757575757LOT1920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344232425262728293031323334353637383940414243441234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132331234567891011121314151617181234567891011AREA (SF)5,7505,7505,7506,5886,5885,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7506,5886,5875,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7506,5876,5995,7545,7545,7545,7545,7545,7545,7545,6774,87311,1025,6915,7375,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7185,6448,2346,8226,2176,2506,2505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7506,5876,5875,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7616,6096,6165,7805,7655,7615,7575,7535,7495,7446,5756,6625,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7506,5986,5775,750NAMEATMOS SITECOMMERCIAL BLOCK 25 LOT 41COMMERCIAL BLOCK 81 LOT 1COMMERCIAL BLOCK 81 LOT 2COMMERCIAL BLOCK 81 LOT 3COMMERCIAL BLOCK 82 LOT 1COMMERCIAL BLOCK 82 LOT 2COMMERCIAL BLOCK 82 LOT 3COMMERCIAL BLOCK 82 LOT 4LIFT STATION SITEURBAN/MULTI-FAMILY BLOCK 78 LOT 1PHASE116109401401401403403403403116402BLOCK02581818182828282078LOTATMOS SITE411231234LIFT STATION SITE1AREA (AC)0.301.671.963.457.371.671.773.0011.900.3517.17PHASE801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802802BLOCK4747474747474747474747474747474747474747474747474747474848484848484848484848484848484848484848484858424242424242424242424242424242424242424242424242424242424242424242424242424242424242454545454545454545454545454545454545LOT1819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243442324252627282930313233343536373839404142434420123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142123456789101112131415161718AREA (SF)5,7505,7505,7505,7506,5876,5885,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7506,5886,5885,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7506,5885,7396,5885,7505,7505,7505,7726,8435,2525,3535,3805,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7136,93811,8897,4895,7145,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,6376,5885,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,750PHASE701701701701701701701701701701800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800800801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801801BLOCK4040404040404040404043434343434348484848484848484848484848484848484848484848494949494949494949494949494949494949494949494343434343434343434343464646464646464646464646464646464646464646464747474747474747474747474747474747LOT89101112131415161712345612345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243447891011121314151617123456789101112131415161718192021221234567891011121314151617AREA (SF)5,2505,2505,2505,2505,2505,2505,2505,2505,2505,2505,7525,7505,7505,7505,7505,7506,5955,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7506,5876,6405,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7506,5885,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7506,5885,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7506,5886,5885,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,750PHASE504504504504504504504504504504504504504504504504504504504504504504504504504504504504504504504504504504504504504504504504507507507507507507507507507507507507507600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600BLOCK7474747474757575757575757576767676767676767676767676767676767676767676767676767684848484848484848484848484444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444449494949494949494949505050505050505050505050505050505050505050LOT28293031321234567827282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525312345678910111213123456789101112131415161718192021222324252613141516171819202122123456789101112131415161718192021AREA (SF)6,5126,5876,7157,0987,2646,2755,7505,7505,7805,8105,8105,8106,3766,6395,7905,7876,9439,16012,9397,5855,7505,7505,7507,28413,4228,3146,7056,4467,2466,9706,4506,1945,9955,7895,4446,74311,1088,3725,9466,2756,5885,7505,7505,1407,99413,4059,39010,2666,6925,1085,7045,7506,5876,2755,7505,7505,8666,6636,6506,8896,9987,0877,2175,9105,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,8395,9125,9145,9155,9167,4975,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7506,5275,8875,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,9706,1546,1546,9077,8316,1786,2825,637PHASE700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700???700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701701BLOCK3434343434343434343535353535353535353535353535353535353535353535???3636363636363636363636363640404040404078787878787878787831313131313131313131313132323232323232323232323232323232323232323232323233333333333333333333333340LOT161718192021222324123456789101112131415161718192021222324141516171819202122232425261234561617181920212223241234567891011121234567891011121314151617181920212223241314151617181920212223247AREA (SF)5,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7506,58710,1705,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7506,5876,5875,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7508,0886,5875,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7115,2485,3125,2505,2505,2505,2618,2306,1105,3755,3755,3755,3755,3755,3755,2436,5885,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7506,5876,5885,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7506,5876,5875,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7506,5886,5875,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7506,5875,250PHASE601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602602700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700700BLOCK5858585858585858585858585858585858585854545454595959595959595959595959595959595959595959595959595959596060606060606060606060606060606060606060606060606161616161616161333333333333333333333333343434343434343434343434343434LOT1234567891011121314151617181912341234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272812345678910111213141516171819202122232412345678123456789101112123456789101112131415AREA (SF)7,2465,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7506,3575,7995,7995,7996,2755,7509,04213,0867,6385,7875,9335,5866,066198,3587,6545,7155,6925,6705,6475,6245,6015,5785,5555,5326,85212,5908,7815,7505,7505,7505,7507,1066,2665,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,8895,8505,9166,0157,2786,7515,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7506,5337,9225,7505,7505,7875,7995,7995,7996,3586,5885,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7506,5876,6895,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7506,5876,5875,7505,750PHASE600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600600601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601601BLOCK5050505050505050505050505151515151515151515151515151515149494949494949494949494951515151515151515151515151515152525252525252525252525252525353535353535353535353535353535353535353535353535353535353535454545454545454545454LOT22232425262728293031323316171819202122232425262728293031123456789101112123456789101112131415123456789101112131412345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293056789101112131415AREA (SF)5,8415,8365,8365,8365,8365,8365,8365,8365,8365,8365,74810,9916,2006,2566,0845,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7526,5876,5875,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7506,7195,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7506,2998,0687,8826,4916,1845,8776,9949,3686,2837,2275,5005,5836,0296,5197,0099,2656,5885,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7509,2078,0225,8045,8045,8045,8045,8045,1137,5446,6935,75511,0448,1675,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7506,6965,7995,7995,7995,7995,7995,7995,7995,7995,8015,7976,373PHASE602100100101104105106117120200400500501501505506507603702802BLOCK61281388132582581647677767584555542LOTPARKLAND 1P 602COMMUNITY PARKPARKLAND 1P 100NEIGHBORHOOD PARKPARKLAND 2P 100NEIGHBORHOOD PARKPARKLAND 1P 101NEIGHBORHOOD PARKPARKLAND 1P 104NEIGHBORHOOD PARKPARKLAND 1P 105NEIGHBORHOOD PARKPARKLAND 1P 106NEIGHBORHOOD PARKPARKLAND 1P 117PARKLAND 1P 120NEIGHBORHOOD PARKPARKLAND 1P 200NEIGHBORHOOD PARKPARKLAND 1P 400NEIGHBORHOOD PARKPARKLAND 1P 500NEIGHBORHOOD PARKPARKLAND 1P 501NEIGHBORHOOD PARKPARKLAND 2P 501NEIGHBORHOOD PARKPARKLAND 1P 505ANEIGHBORHOOD PARKPARKLAND 1P 506ANEIGHBORHOOD PARKPARKLAND 1P 507NEIGHBORHOOD PARKPARKLAND 1P 603ACOMMUNITY PARKPARKLAND 1P 702ACOMMUNITY PARKPARKLAND 1P 802COMMUNITY PARKAREA (AC)1.08910.5750.0390.5340.2171.0380.5374.6090.1725.9531.0750.2250.4240.3295.4581.1680.7095.19110.4231.702PHASE100100100100100100101104104105106106109115117200200200202203203203400400400400400700400400403B403B403500500500501501501502502503500503503504505A506A600601601602603A700700700700701702A800800800801801801801802802802802803803803083602BLOCK22345713878131325252527252537377836808179797980797984648266686470727776766563696776767544584959036787840405549484346474843424546425555555559LOTCOMMON AREA 1E 100COMMON AREA D 100COMMON AREA 1D 100COMMON AREA 1C 100COMMON AREA 1B 100COMMON AREA 1A 100COMMON AREA 1A 101COMMON AREA B 104COMMON AREA A 104COMMON AREA A 105COMMON AREA A 106COMMON AREA B 106COMMON AREA A 109COMMON AREA C 115COMMON AREA C117COMMON AREA B 200COMMON AREA A 200COMMON AREA A 200COMMON AREA A 202COMMON AREA B 203COMMON AREA A 203COMMONAREA C 203COMMON AREA H 400COMMON AREA C 400AND REC CENTERCOMMON AREA B 400AND PAECOMMON AREA G 400 AND PUECOMMON AREA E 400 AND PUECOMMON AREA F 400 AND PUECOMMON AREA D 400 AND PUECOMMON AREA A 400,PrDE, AND PAECOMMON AREA A 403B ANDPRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTCOMMON AREA B 403BCOMMON AREA A 403COMMON AREA C 500COMMON AREA B 500COMMON AREA A 500COMMON AREA C 501COMMON AREC A 501COMMON AREA B 501COMMON AREA A 502COMMON AREA B 502COMMON AREA C 503COMMON AREA A 503COMMON AREA E 503COMMON AREA D 503COMMON AREA A 504COMMON AREA F 505COMMON AREA G 506COMMON AREA A 600COMMON AREA B 601COMMON AREA C 601COMMON AREA C 602COMMON AREA H 603COMMON AREA C 700COMMON AREA A 700COMMON AREA D 700COMMON AREA E 700COMMON AREA A 701COMMON AREA I 702COMMON AREA A 800COMMON AREA B 800COMMON AREA C 800COMMON AREA C 801COMMON AREA B 801COMMON AREA A 801COMMON AREA D 801COMMON AREA C 802COMMON AREA B 802COMMON AREA A 802COMMON AREA D 802COMMON AREA D 803COMMON AREA A 803COMMON AREA B 803COMMON AREA C 8033AREA (AC)0.0796.6270.0560.0560.0640.0400.0400.0400.0400.0220.0790.1180.0047.6882.9730.0400.0402.2930.0530.0530.5730.0520.2072.3250.0370.0220.0220.0440.0530.0620.1370.1270.1760.1340.1400.1450.1390.1470.0580.0540.0800.2390.6880.0570.1620.1581.4220.4730.8620.1520.0740.0946.7600.0780.1210.0280.1820.3213.2790.0740.0740.1940.0740.1480.0740.3310.0740.1480.0740.2110.1240.1540.0400.0260.208PHASE803803803803803803803BLOCK57575757575757LOT12131415161718AREA (SF)5,7505,7505,7505,7505,7505,7506,662TBPE NO. 12327911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E.College Station, Texas 77840www(979) 764-3900ENGINEER:PRELIMINARY PLANNOT FOR RECORDSOUTHERN POINTE SUBDIVISION552.9 ACRES 2,097 RESIDENTIAL LOTS8 COMMERCIAL LOTS1 REC CENTER LOT1 ATMOS SITE1 LIFT STATION SITE1 URBAN/MULTI-FAMILY LOTS D SMITH LEAGUE, A-21COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS, TEXASSCALE: AS SHOWNAUGUST, 2024SURVEYOR:Nathan Paul Kerr, RPLS No. 6834Kerr Surveying, LLC409 N. Texas Ave.Bryan, TX 77803(979) 268-3195TBPELS FIRM # 10018500SECTION 105: 14.061 ACRES - 69 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.022 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 507: 3.304 ACRES - 13 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 109: 3.121 ACRES - 1 COMMERCIAL LOT (0.004 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 600: 16.024 ACRES - 85 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.862 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 117: 7.581 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.973 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 601: 18.887 ACRES - 101 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.226 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 203: 23.589 ACRES - 129 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.678 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 602: 17.548 ACRES - 64 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.286 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 402: 17.174 ACRES - 1 URBAN/MF LOT (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 603: 6.760 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (6.760 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 403B: 0.465 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.264 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 603A: 5.191 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 500: 11.218 ACRES - 58 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.419 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 700: 18.080 ACRES - 88 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.409 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 501: 17.487 ACRES - 87 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.344 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 701: 12.804 ACRES - 59 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.321 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 502: 6.048 ACRES - 34 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.134 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 702: 3.279 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (3.279 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 503: 19.460 ACRES - 106 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (1.146 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 702A: 10.423 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 504: 22.971 ACRES - 96 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.392 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 800: 8.642 ACRES - 50 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.342 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 505: 1.422 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (1.422 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 801: 18.398 ACRES - 100 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.627 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 505A: 5.458 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 802: 22.365 ACRES - 108 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.507 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 506: 0.473 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.473 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 803: 12.211 ACRES - 69 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.344 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 506A: 1.168 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SAVE AND EXCEPTSECTION 100: 49.184 ACRES - 150 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (6.922 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 119: 4.949 ACRES - 28 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 101: 10.439 ACRES - 57 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.040 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 120: 5.321 ACRES - 29 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 102: 9.899 ACRES - 56 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 200: 26.067 ACRES - 65 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.373 ACRES C.A.) &ATMOS/LIFT STATIONSECTION 103: 9.899 ACRES - 56 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 201: 15.764 ACRES - 83 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 104: 6.675 ACRES - 36 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.080 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 202: 18.808 ACRES - 97 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.053 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 106: 10.399 ACRES - 57 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.197 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 400: 15.507 ACRES - 67 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.772 ACRES C.A.) &REC CENTERSECTION 111: 5.424 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 401: 12.788 ACRES - 3 COMMERCIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 115: 7.688 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (7.688 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 403: 18.515 ACRES - 4 COMMERCIAL LOTS (0.176 ACRES C.A.)OWNER:Phillips 3 Land Holdings, LLC1140 Midtown DriveCollege Station, TX 77845(979) 255-4466DEVELOPER:BV Southern Pointe Development, Inc.1140 Midtown DriveCollege Station, TX 77845(979) 255-4466Page 47 of 223 PARKLAND 1P 506A NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 1.17 AC. 3 19 PARKLAND 1P 802 COMMUNITY PARK 1.70 AC. COMMON AREA I 702 (3.279 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA G 506 (0.473 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA F 505 (1.422 ACRE DETENTION POND) 1 COMMON AREA C 115 (7.688 ACRE DETENTION POND) COMMON AREA C 400 AND REC CENTER 2.33 ACRES 35 1 COMMON AREA A 200 (2.293 ACRE DETENTION POND) 23 1 1 COMMON AREA H 603 (6.760 ACRE DETENTION POND) 7 PARKLAND 1P 501 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 0.42 AC. PARKLAND 1P 505A NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 5.46 AC. PARKLAND 1P 702A COMMUNITY PARK 10.42 AC. PARKLAND 1P 603A COMMUNITY PARK 5.19 AC. 7 22 PARKLAND 1P 507 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 0.71 AC. 42 PARKLAND 1P 400 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 1.07 AC. 21 15 4444 30 27 33 PATR I O T D R I V E KEN N E S A W D R I V E NAT C H E Z D R I V E 17 18 15 12 1 30 2 37 7 5 39 9 510 8 26 11 8 9 10 2 17 17 12 15 4 25 4 23 21 19 16 15 207 8 9 24 28 27 26 21 23 22 19 22 25 20 3 27 14 15 27 282930313233 26 34 7 26 19 11 30 15 13 18 9 21 28 3 11 9 12 11 9 10 9 19 9 18 38 3641 28 3 17 13 35 44 10 19 14 16 20 15 13 18 17 19 18 16 20 10 14 13 1 4 16 14 11 2 7 3 8 13 4 9 5 6 10 16 41 14 40 39 30 38 37 43 36 26 35 42 34 17 1 40 39 37 23 24 22 31 10 7 9 2 29 27 25 21 20 18 11 5 6 4 8 12 33 3213 33 15 11 22 18 14 10 21 17 13 9 20 16 12 19 33 37 41 23 29 34 38 42 24 25 35 39 31 43 32 36 40 27 44 1 20 19 18 13 16 15 14 9 11 10 7 8 6 5 4 2 31 22 12 27 41 9 43 40 38 36 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 24 26 25 23 42 23 12 4 17 11 3 16 10 15 2 22 14 8 1 21 13 7 20 6 24 19 5 18 22 24 12 1 13 17 16 15 14 19 18 17 20 23 19 15 18 14 21 15 23 20 14 22 16 19 21 7 3 2 8 12 4 9 5 10 6 2 11 26 10 12 12 11 12 3 8 24 9 13 16 5 10 22 1 11 6 7 11 176 2 26 25 24 15 14 13 23 3 1 191816141523457810 7 9 12 10 19 22 24 25 2927 12 11 8 6 4 3 2 6 5 12 21 2 11 16 26 17 49 12 28 13 14 18 67 15 8 3 14 8 4 22 21 20 18 19 17 16 15 14 2 9 3 4 5 6 7 1 17 18 25 22 1 5 2 6 3 7 4 20 19 22 18 21 19 18 17 20 14 1213 13 151617181920 141516 151617 19 24 23 16 20 14 21 17 22 13 26 12 18 25 10 5 11 2 6 7 21 12 3 8 1 9 4 11 16 4 9 17 1018 5 1 6 7 2 3 8 15 4 1 5 21 12 6 13 22 3 7 2423212019 14 171211131615 2010 1211 8 7 6 1 8 2 3 10 4 11 5 6 7 9 16 8 25 15 7 24 14 6 23 13 5 22 19 12 4 18 113 17 1019 27 6 14 22 30 15 23 31 8 16 24 1 9 25 2 10 18 26 3 11 17 19 27 4 12 20 28 5 13 21 29 9 23 7 17 18 19 20 12 14 15 16 19 11 18 4 17 10 3 16 9 2 15 81 22 14 21 13 6 20 12 5 13 21 18 16 18 20 232425 2627282930 3132 1 13 6 5 3 2 1 6 14 15 7 16 4 8 12 5 9 2 10 33 3 11 12 4 5 9 17 6 10 14 2 7 11 8 18 11 14 17 19 13 10 9 12 20 22 128 9 10 11 25 24 7 23 6 15 18 5 21 17 9 4 16 11 8 20 3 19 2 10 2 1 5 4 3 21 1 2 3 4 18 19 20 16 10 17 18 11 12 13 20 1415 9 33 11 3 10 2 9 8 7 6 5 12 4 1 2931323534 17 23 22 21 20 19 18 16 28 26 25 24 23 19 20 13 21 14 22 15 23 16 24 17 18 9 1 18 8 24 17 7 16 6 15 5 22 14 4 21 13 11 3 20 12 10 2 19 10 20 13 14 20 13 19 12 1118 10 17 16 15 22 25 26 25 31 23 24 302928 26 2827 23 13 26 14 15 17 18 19 20 17 29 18 19 2 20 22 23 24 16 21 21 2 25 112 18 212019 7 6 5 12 4 11 3 10 9 8 16 15 5 21 13 24 6 20 3 10 4 7 22 11 1 8 12 19181716 4 8 1 16 2 3 14 7 13 6 12 5 11 10 3 9 2 1 15 8 15 14 11 10 9 13 14 24 16 9 23 8 22 15 7 21 14 6 20 13 5 19 12 4 26 18 11 25 17 10 27 15 17 11 12 9 14 16 18 19 11 19 20 15 16 17 13 12 10 9 14 18 URBAN / MULTI-FAMILY BLOCK 78 LOT 1 17.17 AC. 5 9 24 20 16 2 6 10 23 19 15 3 7 11 22 18 14 4 8 13 21 17 2 15314413567 17101169 13 2 20 18 22 4 12 8 26 19 23 3 11 7 2024 2 14 106 16 2125 13 951 35 8 44 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 11 18 20 19 25 26 32 12 13 10 GUNN RIDGE DRIVEMARIETTA LOOPLAUREL RIDGE LANEMARIETTA LOOPSEBRING DRIVEROCKFORD DRIVEWEDDINGTON ROADMARIETTA LOOPLAUREL RIDGE LANEMARIETTA LOOPKATIE LOOPLANE RAE LOOP LANA R A E L O O P PETAL LA N E SHUB A T A D R I V E CAMD E N L A N E AMOR Y D R I V E KINNEY LANE PETAL LANE SHUBATA DRIVE CAMDEN LANE AMORY DRIVE CONOLE CO U R T CHATOM DRIVEGUNN RIDGE DRIVEWEDDINGTON ROAD RISI DRIVE QUIN L A N D R I V E SAM A N T H A L A N E GUN N R I D G E D R I V E ELDORA DRIVE ELDORA DRIVEPOCONO DRIVEWILKESBORO DRIVETALLADEGA DRIVESOUTHERN CROSS DRIVEROCKFORD DRIVEDAYTONA DRIVEELDORA DRIVEPATRIOT DRIVE CANT O N D R I V E VERO N A D R I V E PATR I O T D R I V E KEN N E S A W D R I V E SOUTHERN POINTE PARKWAY SOUT H E R N P O I N T E P A R K W A Y MATHER PARKWAYMATHER PARKWAYRALEIGH DRIVEMINOR COLLECTORMAJOR COLLECTOR16 27 368 13 765 4 17 16 15 14 10 12 11 9 10 11 14 9 12 13 8 15 76 1918 17 23 16 222120 12 9 10 13 14 11 15 18 23 14 19 15 20 16 21 17 22 8 3 7 2 11 6 10 5 9 4 14 40 35 36 34 22 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 13 12 CAN T O N D R I V E VER O N A D R I V EVERONA DRIVEWAT K I N S W A YVICKI LANEKINNEY LANE5 3 4 2 32 24 23 29 25 26 28 10 2 9 8 7 6 5 12 4 11 3 1 24 1 1 17 30 13 17 28 24 32 272829 26 33363534 3132 30 ROXIE LANE31 COMMERCIAL BLOCK 81 LOT 2 3.45 AC. COMMERCIAL BLOCK 81 LOT 1 1.96 AC. COMMERCIAL BLOCK 81 LOT 3 7.37 AC. COMMERCIAL BLOCK 82 LOT 3 3.00 AC. COMMERCIAL BLOCK 82 LOT 1 1.67 AC. 13 PARKLAND 1P 106 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 0.54 AC. PARKLAND 1P 101 PARKLAND 1P 500 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 0.22 AC. PARKLAND 1P 200 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 5.95 AC.VICKI LANE2 5 8 3 29 15 3 23 13 14 COMMERCIAL BLOCK 82 LOT 2 1.77 AC. 2 5 5 8 2 1 7 6 5 3 23 18 14 18 12 17 13 9 16 10 22 15 19 11 24 23 21 20 1 2 3 4 8 6 7 1089 1 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 21 19 20 22 1 27 28 9 8 1 2 3 11 4 12 18 5 136 14 7 17 10 16 15 7 33 6 32 5 31 4 30 3 9 2 8 1 29 28 26 25 24 23 212019181715141312 11 10 22 1 6 27 12 11 10 6 9 7 5 8 8 7 2 14 13 6 1 3 4 1 13 9 COMMERCIAL BLOCK 82 LOT 4 11.90 AC. PARKLAND 2P 501 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 0.33 AC. 2 10 8 1 5 4 3 2 5 6 4 9 3 272829 32 34 35 36 37 38 39 42 44 45 46 47 49 52 53 2 1 3 21 22 18 17 23 48 50 40 3 2 9 2 10 3 11 4 12 5 13 6 7 8 6 11 9 10 5 12 13 1 7 15 14 1 20 9 16 22 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 19 21 20 1718 31 2 33 3132 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 161514 131211 1098 43 1 26 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 5 6 7 10 8 25 22 23 2421 27 17 28 16 29 15 30 14 31 33 34 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 32 22 14 7 21 13 6 20 5 19 12 4 18 11 3 17 10 2 16 15 8 1 33 34 39 35 36 37 38 41 40 42 43 1716915814131211107432165 35 34 23 25 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 5234 6 7 8 10 1 11 2421 41 33 31 30 37 38 39 42 43 41 24 18 17 BALD W I N D R I V E MARIETTA LOOP 24 11 12 51 43 5 4 20 15 16 7 17 8 18 9 19 10 1 11 13 14 12 2 3 4 56 12 8 9 10 14 13 11 16 15 14 24 27 413 25 26 12 7 11 28 29 30 32 1 9 8 10 2 3 6 5 4 4 PARKLAND 1P 602 COMMUNITY PARK 1.09 AC. 76 26 28 29 27 27 25 13 30313233343536 37 38 39 40 42 42 43 44 4546474849 50 51 52 53 54 5657 55 58 60 62 63 63 64 64 84 76 72 70 68 66 65 67 69 71 73 74 76 76 41 78 80 79 79 79 81 82 42 75 61 59 59 55 76 76 12 11 13 15 16 18 1603 LF 620 LF620 LF620 LF620 LF620 LF620 LF623 LF627 LF663 LF931 LF 675 LF791 L F 748 L F 821 L F 837 L F 909 L F 925 L F 684 L F 573 L F 679 LF 1488 LF1332 L F 606 LF 688 LF 706 LF 788 LF 806 LF 888 LF 906 LF 988 LF 675 LF 548 LF 553 LF 581 LF 586 LF 595 LF 595 LF 581 LF 722 LF419 LF577 LF 1006 LF 1146 LF1148 LF1148 LF1148 LF1148 LF1148 LF1148 LF1148 LF1148 LF1148 LF1142 LF 1141 LF 1697 LF 1909 LF1198 LF 553 LF 464 L F 773 L F 840 L F 858 L F 1099 L F 1328 L F 647 LF 652 LF354 LF627 LF620 LF1474 LF441 LF790 LF931 LF 908 LF503 LF 820 LF 795 LF 308 LF117 LF257 LF 266 LF31 BRAXTON DRIVE 20 547 LF TBPE NO. 12327 911 SOUTHWEST PKWY E. College Station, Texas 77840 www (979) 764-3900 ENGINEER: PRELIMINARY PLAN NOT FOR RECORD SOUTHERN POINTE SUBDIVISION 552.9 ACRES 2,097 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 8 COMMERCIAL LOTS 1 REC CENTER LOT 1 ATMOS SITE 1 LIFT STATION SITE 1 URBAN/MULTI-FAMILY LOT S D SMITH LEAGUE, A-21 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS, TEXAS SCALE: AS SHOWN AUGUST, 2024SURVEYOR: Nathan Paul Kerr, RPLS No. 6834 Kerr Surveying, LLC 409 N. Texas Ave. Bryan, TX 77803 (979) 268-3195 TBPELS FIRM # 10018500 SECTION 105: 14.061 ACRES - 69 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.022 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 507: 3.304 ACRES - 13 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 109: 3.121 ACRES - 1 COMMERCIAL LOT (0.004 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 600: 16.024 ACRES - 85 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.862 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 117: 7.581 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.973 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 601: 18.887 ACRES - 101 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.226 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 203: 23.589 ACRES - 129 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.678 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 602: 17.548 ACRES - 64 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.286 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 402: 17.174 ACRES - 1 URBAN/MF LOT (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 603: 6.760 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (6.760 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 403B: 0.465 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.264 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 603A: 5.191 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 500: 11.218 ACRES - 58 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.419 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 700: 18.080 ACRES - 88 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.409 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 501: 17.487 ACRES - 87 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.344 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 701: 12.804 ACRES - 59 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.321 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 502: 6.048 ACRES - 34 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.134 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 702: 3.279 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (3.279 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 503: 19.460 ACRES - 106 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (1.146 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 702A: 10.423 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 504: 22.971 ACRES - 96 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.392 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 800: 8.642 ACRES - 50 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.342 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 505: 1.422 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (1.422 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 801: 18.398 ACRES - 100 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.627 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 505A: 5.458 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 802: 22.365 ACRES - 108 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.507 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 506: 0.473 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.473 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 803: 12.211 ACRES - 69 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.344 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 506A: 1.168 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SAVE AND EXCEPT SECTION 100: 49.184 ACRES - 150 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (6.922 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 119: 4.949 ACRES - 28 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 101: 10.439 ACRES - 57 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.040 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 120: 5.321 ACRES - 29 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 102: 9.899 ACRES - 56 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 200: 26.067 ACRES - 65 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.373 ACRES C.A.) & ATMOS/LIFT STATION SECTION 103: 9.899 ACRES - 56 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 201: 15.764 ACRES - 83 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 104: 6.675 ACRES - 36 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.080 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 202: 18.808 ACRES - 97 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.053 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 106: 10.399 ACRES - 57 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.197 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 400: 15.507 ACRES - 67 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (2.772 ACRES C.A.) & REC CENTER SECTION 111: 5.424 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 401: 12.788 ACRES - 3 COMMERCIAL LOTS (0.000 ACRES C.A.) SECTION 115: 7.688 ACRES - 0 RESIDENTIAL LOTS (7.688 ACRES C.A.)SECTION 403: 18.515 ACRES - 4 COMMERCIAL LOTS (0.176 ACRES C.A.) OWNER: Phillips 3 Land Holdings, LLC 1140 Midtown Drive College Station, TX 77845 (979) 255-4466 DEVELOPER: BV Southern Pointe Development, Inc. 1140 Midtown Drive College Station, TX 77845 (979) 255-4466 WAIVERS APPROVED AT JANUARY 5, 2017 P&Z MEETING WAIVER #BLOCK #APPROVED LENGTH (FEET) PROPOSED LENGTH (FEET) 11 55 1570 1697 12 42 1909 --- 13 44 1328 --- 15 64 1488 --- 16 63 1332 --- 18 76 1388 1603 GENERAL SUBURBAN BLOCK LENGTH EXHIBIT NEW WAIVER BLOCK # LENGTH (FEET) 59 1474 Page 48 of 223 September 5, 2024 Item No. 5.3. Housing Action Plan Sponsor: David Brower Reviewed By CBC: City Council Agenda Caption: Public Hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding ordinance amending the College Station Comprehensive Plan by adopting a new Housing Action Plan. Relationship to Strategic Goals: Good Governance, Core Services & Infrastructure, Neighborhood Integrity, Diverse & Growing Economy, Improving Mobility Recommendation(s): Staff recommends approval. Summary: Staff is bringing the Housing Action Plan for a recommendation that City Council approve the plan through an ordinance to amend Comprehensive Plan. The City of College Station’s Housing Action Plan strives to address pressing housing issues and to accomplish housing action items in the City’s Comprehensive Plan, specifically Action Items 2.3, 3.4, 3.6, and 3.9. The two main overarching goals of the Housing Action Plan are to create and incentivize more housing units of various types to meet growing demand and to incentivize the production and preservation of housing that is affordable to community members. The 13-member Housing Action Plan Steering Committee has worked with City Staff to advise and make recommendations for a plan that reflects the community’s vision for housing action and initiatives. Staff presented the draft Goals, Strategies, and Actions Report for the Housing Action Plan after giving a brief overview of the Existing Conditions Report and citizen participation efforts at the Planning and Zoning Commission’s July 18th meeting. The draft plan was presented to City Council at their August 8th meeting. Changes to the plan were incorporated after direction from the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, namely to add language about encouraging and incentivizing the production of housing units. Budget & Financial Summary: Not determined Attachments: 1. Housing Action Plan Page 49 of 223 HOUSING ACTION PLAN Page 50 of 223 CONTENTS EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT •Introduction •Why Housing Matters •College Station Existing Conditions Report Findings Summary •College Station Demographics & Growth •Education •Employment •Where do College Station Workers Live? •College Station Housing Stock •Projected Housing Supply Shortage GOALS/STRATEGIES/ ACTIONS REPORT •Goals, Strategies, Actions •Comprehensive Plan Action Items •Goals •Public Meeting Feedback July 16, 2024 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION SUMMARY •General Housing Survey •Student Survey •Employer Survey •Public Meeting Feedback •Survey: Goals/Strategies/Actions HOUSING ACTION PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS 3 3 5 7 8 13 16 22 25 27 37 39 40 41 47 53 54 111 147 162 166 173 Page 51 of 223 3CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Housing opportunity and affordability are pressing national and local issues. Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies paints a broad picture of the state of US housing markets in their publication “The State of the Nation’s Housing 2023” - https://www.jchs.harvard.edu/ state-nations-housing-2023 The report highlights renter cost burdens reaching record levels, increasingly high incomes being needed to purchase homes, a general decline of low-cost rentals, and the number of homes for sale being at historic lows. Demographic trends and market shifts fueled by the pandemic combined with a housing shortage and a spike in interest rates have led to a rapid increase in housing costs – one that incomes have not kept up with. These housing trends are evident in College Station and the entire Brazos Valley region. The City addresses the issues of housing opportunity and affordability primarily through two planning documents: •The 5 Year Consolidated Plan – Required by the Department of Housing and Urban Development to receive federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and Home Investment Partnership Grant (HOME) funds. This Plan assesses the City’s affordable housing and community development needs to make market and data driven decisions on how to invest CDBG and HOME funds. The 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan can be viewed here. INTRODUCTION Page 52 of 223 4CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN •The City’s Comprehensive Plan - Establishes a long-range vision for College Station’s growth and development, housing, mobility, parks, the environment, economic development, city-provided infrastructure and services, and other related topics. This plan acts as a guidebook for decision- makers and is implemented over time through ordinances, infrastructure improvements, and other public and private development decisions. The City’s Comprehensive Plan can be viewed here. The Goal of the College Station Housing Action Plan is to investigate available tools to create or incentivize affordable housing opportunities for residents. The plan will support the impactful implementation of housing goals in the City’s Comprehensive Plan, specifically the following four Strategic Actions: •Action 2.3 – Create incentives and programs to revitalize existing areas and established neighborhoods. This could include façade or landscaping improvement programs or rehabilitation initiatives. New programs should align with and complement existing City efforts through the Neighborhood Partnership Program, Neighborhood Grant Program, and proposed property maintenance programing. •Action 3.4 – Expand affordable housing and workforce housing. Continue to support efforts, programs, and incentives aimed at developing affordable housing stock and assisting low-and moderate- income citizens to secure affordable homeownership and/or rental opportunities. Potential actions may include regulatory provisions such as: ∙Development standards that reduce barriers for affordable and diverse housing types. ∙Pre-approved building plans or pattern books for target locations. ∙Incentives such as density bonuses or more flexible standards, or ∙A workforce housing capital pool where a public entity establishes a fund that is used for various types of affordable housing initiatives. •Action 3.6 - Develop and refine data monitoring processes to analyze housing trends and define a strategic set of actions to address housing affordability, diversity, and gentrification. Consider existing market data, best practices, and existing regulations and incentives. •Action 3.9 – Continue partnering with local nonprofit organizations and area partners to support affordable housing options. Continue partnerships with organizations such as the Brazos County Home Repair Coalition, Bryan/College Station Habitat for Humanity, Brazos Valley Community Action Programs, Elder Aid, Brazos Valley Council of Governments, and housing tax credit developers. Page 53 of 223 5CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Housing is key to College Station’s future. Quality affordable housing opportunity is connected to better life outcomes, especially for children, and to economic competitiveness. •Health - There is strong evidence characterizing housing’s relationship to health. Housing stability, quality, safety, and affordability all affect health outcomes, as do physical and social characteristics of neighborhoods (Health Affairs Policy Brief). ∙The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identified housing as an important social determinant of health, highlighting the link between where people live and their health. - https://health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/social-determinants-health ∙Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Issue Brief on Housing and Health. ∙Habitat for Humanity International – “How does housing impact health?” ∙Brookings Institute Report – Housing as a Hub for Health, Community Services, and Upward Mobility. States that housing is important as a “hub” for well-being. WHY HOUSING MATTERS Page 54 of 223 6CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN •Opportunity/Upward Mobility – Housing is a platform for opportunity and upward mobility. ∙Urban Institute brief focusing on evidence of relationship between housing and upward mobility. Why Housing Matters for Upward Mobility. ∙Opportunity Atlas mapping tool. Shows which neighborhoods in America offer children the best chance to rise out of poverty. One key finding is that growing up in a higher-mobility area has a causal effect on children’s outcomes in adulthood, in proportion to childhood exposure. ∙Penn Institute for Urban Research Opportunity and Housing Access. •Economy – The existence of housing affordable to a range of households is key to economic growth. Businesses need a diversity of workers to thrive and grow; and those workers in turn need a range of housing options. ∙National Association of Counties – Housing as Part of a County’s Economic Development Strategy. “Having a sufficient supply of housing affordable to households all along the income spectrum is also critical to supporting vibrant and sustainable local economies.” ∙The Urban Institute – Four Reasons Why Employers Should Care about Housing. “Available, affordable housing that fits a range of household types and lifestyles is essential to attracting, retaining, and developing a diverse, productive workforce.” Page 55 of 223 7CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN College Station, home of Texas A&M University, has seen rapid growth since the 1970s and has become a desirable place to live, work, and go to school. Like most cities in the U.S., College Station’s home prices and rents have risen significantly in recent years and the city currently has a shortage of moderately priced housing. Housing costs have risen at a faster pace than incomes resulting in a financial strain for renters and a lack of homeownership opportunities for low- and moderate-income workers. Significant findings of the Existing Conditions Report include the following: • Most College Station workers live outside the city limits. • Most units in College Station are single family homes or multifamily apartments. There is a lack of middle housing options like duplexes, condos, and townhomes. • Population and development predictions project a significant housing supply shortage by 2030. • 58% of renters and 18% of homeowners with a mortgage in College Station are cost burdened (spending more than 30% of their monthly income on housing costs) • The 2023 median sales price for a non-new construction home in College Station was $389,000 – a price that is out of reach for most middle-income families. COLLEGE STATION EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT FINDINGS SUMMARY Page 56 of 223 8CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN College Station is a unique in many ways. Incorporated in 1938, College Station is relatively young with an older sister city (the City of Bryan) that was incorporated in 1871. While young, the city is home to the oldest public institution of higher education in the state, Texas A&M University (established in 1876). Texas A&M is also the largest university in the nation by enrollment and one of the largest campuses in the country at 5,200 acres. The College Station – Bryan metropolitan statistical area (MSA) serves as the economic and educational hub of the entire Brazos Valley region. The populations of Bryan and College Station grew at about the same rate until the 1970s, when an influx of students at Texas A&M University (the result of a change in enrollment policies) contributed to accelerated growth. Both College Station and Texas A&M University have grown and changed quickly. In 1970 Texas A&M had a total enrollment of 14,200 students and the City’s population was 17,676. Today, Texas A&M enrolls 74,824 students and the population of College Station is 124,326 – a 426% and 603% increase respectively. In 1970 there were just over 4,000 total housing units in College Station, today there are over 48,000 (1970 Census and 2021 ACS 5 Year Estimate). COLLEGE STATION DEMOGRAPHICS & GROWTH Page 57 of 223 9CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Looking specifically at the City of College Station and the number of college students living in the city, American Community Survey data estimates that 45,506 residents of College Station are enrolled in college or graduate school (37,541 undergraduates and 7,965 in graduate or professional school) (Source: 2021 ACS 5 Year Estimates). It can be assumed that most of these students are enrolled at Texas A&M University, however; a percentage also are most likely enrolled at Blinn College, the Texas A&M RELLIS Campus, or Sam Houston State University. College Station and Brazos County Population Growth Year College Station Population Brazos County Population 1990 52,456 121,862 2000 67,890 154,415 2010 93,857 194,851 2020 120,511 233,849 2022 ACS 124,326 242,014 2030 P&DS Estimate 145,000 Data: Decennial Census, American Community Survey, College Station P&DS Population Growth Page 58 of 223 10CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Age Group 2010 2020 Numerical Change % Change 85 years and over 471 734 263 55.84 75 to 84 years 1,388 2,469 1,081 77.88 65 to 74 years 2,516 4,613 2,097 83.35 60 to 64 years 1,923 3,030 1,107 57.57 55 to 59 years 2,457 3,212 755 30.73 45 to 54 years 5,796 7,796 2,000 34.51 35 to 44 years 7,134 10,134 3,000 42.05 25 to 34 years 13,922 17,447 3,525 25.32 20 to 24 years 30,850 35,318 4,468 14.48 15 to 19 years 15,578 18,297 2,719 17.45 10 to 14 years 3,386 5,323 1,937 57.21 5 to 9 years 3,910 5,713 1,803 46.11 Under 5 Years 4,526 6,486 1,960 43.31 Population by Age in College Station 2010 vs. 2020 The fastest growing age group in College Station is adults 60 years old and above, with the largest increase in adults between the ages of 65 and 74 years. Texas A&M’s influence is evident: in 2020, 29% of the population was between the ages of 20 and 24. This same demographic makes up 7% of the total Texas population. Page 59 of 223 11CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 White Black Asian Hispanic All Other Races 63.5 60 50.1 8.1 10.4 12.2 10.2 6.3 5.4 19.4 27 39.3 7.4 10.1 13.6 College Station Brazos County TexasPercentRace and Ethnicity In College Station, over 63% of the population that identifies as a single race is White, a greater proportion than in the county or state. There are fewer Black and Hispanic residents, though more Asian, in College Station than in Brazos County or the state. Race and Ethnicity 2020 Cencus Comparative Overview Source: US Census Bureau 2020 Decennial Census Page 60 of 223 12CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Despite the preponderance of White population in the city, College Station has seen a surge in the minority population over the last decade. The Hispanic population has nearly doubled in just ten years; gains were also made in the Black (53.3%) and Asian (43.6%) populations. The “All Other Races” category includes those who identify as “Some other race” on the census, Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, and those who identify as American Indian or Alaska Native – this group has grown by over 130% since 2010. The population of College Station is diversifying as it grows. Race/Ethnicity in College Station 2010 vs. 2020 Race/Ethnicity 2010 2020 Numerical Change % Change White 72,502 76,475 3,973 5.5 Black 6,383 9,788 3,405 53.3 Asian 8,576 12,317 3,741 43.6 All Other Races 4,161 8,903 4,742 113.9 Hispanic Origin 13,165 23,357 10,192 77.4 Source: US Census Bureau 2010 and 2020 Decennial Census Page 61 of 223 13CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN College Station Independent School District College Station ISD is experiencing rapid growth along with the City and Texas A&M University. CSISD’s enrollment was 14,462 for the 2022-23 school year. The enrollment in 1993 was 6,150 – a 135% increase. More information about current and projected future CSISD enrollment can be found in their Annual Enrollment Review and Report. As it has grown, CSISD has maintained a high level of academic performance as judged by their Texas Education Agency rating system score. CSISD has a rating of 89 overall and a letter grade of B. More about this rating can be found here. Demographics for College Station Independent School District can be found on CSISD’s website here. Of note is that 35.8% of CSISD students are considered at-risk of not meeting standards or dropping out of school and 35.95% are economically disadvantaged, meaning they are eligible to participate in the national free or reduced-priced lunch program. EDUCATION Page 62 of 223 14CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Texas A&M University Texas A&M University is the flagship institution of the Texas A&M University System and is the only university in Texas to hold a simultaneous designations as a land, sea, and space grant institution. Texas A&Ms 74,828 students earn degrees in more than 130 courses of study through 17 colleges. As mentioned previously, Texas A&M University has experienced rapid growth and change since the 1970s. Current student demographics can be found here. While it can be assumed that many of the University’s undergraduate students are dependents of their parents and receiving financial support, a look at the Financial Aid Common Data Set shows that 21,554 of the 50,109 undergraduates at Texas A&M were determined to have financial need – 43% of all undergraduate students. Educational Attainment in College Station Compared to the state, College Station has a higher percentage of high school and college graduates. A person living in College Station is almost twice as likely to have a college degree as elsewhere in the state. Moreover, while almost 30% of the over-25 population in College Station has a graduate or professional degree, only 11.2% in the state have attained that level of education. Page 63 of 223 15CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Educational Attainment 2021 ACS 5yr Estimate College Station Texas Number Percent Number Percent Total residents over age 25 51,640 18,619,469 Less than 9th grade 963 1.9%1,422,360 7.6% 9th to 12th grade, no diploma 1,711 3.3%1,403,821 7.5% High school graduate 6,785 13.1%4,563,619 24.5% Some college, no degree 8,775 17.0%3,956,030 21.2% Associate degree 3,465 6.7%1,402,444 7.5% Bachelor’s degree 15,633 30.3%3,791,665 20.4% Graduate or professional degree 14,337 27.8%2,079,530 11.2% Percent high school graduate or higher 94.8%84.8% Percent bachelor’s degree or higher 58.0%31.5% Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year Estimates (2016-2021) Education plays a major role in a person’s future earning power. With each additional level of education, a person is much more likely to have greater income. For example, an individual in College Station with a bachelor’s degree is likely to earn annually $25,844 more per year than a person with a high school education. Over a thirty-year career, that would amount to a gap of over $775,320, not considering the potential for promotions and other means of upward mobility because of education. Income by Educational Attainment Texas Brazos County College Station Less than high School graduate $26,451 $26,334 $16,042 High school graduate $32,983 $32,032 $34,199 Some college / associate’s degree $40,650 $36,049 $37,224 Batchelor’s degree $60,543 $51,739 $51,840 Graduate / professional degree $76,818 $64,239 $66,213 Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year Estimates (2016-2021) While this data reveals many positive conclusions, one fact cannot be understated: there are at least 9,459 individuals in College Station, age 25 and over, that have no more than a high school education (diploma, GED, or less), lacking the requisite education for many career opportunities. Page 64 of 223 16CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN EMPLOYMENT The table below shows the estimated employment status of the working-age population in 2021. With a large undergraduate student population, the city has a larger percentage of residents age 16 and older not in the labor force. According to the American Community Survey (ACS) glossary, this category “consists mainly of students, homemakers, retired workers, seasonal workers interviewed in an off season who were not looking for work, institutionalized people, and people doing only incidental unpaid family work (less than 15 hours during the reference week).” For those in the labor force, the county, and especially the state, share a greater percentage of the unemployed population. Texas Brazos County College Station Total Pop. Over 16 22,261,181 188,101 98,179 Civilian Labor Force 14,390,216 64.6%115,759 61.5%59,768 60.9% Employed 13,618,630 61.2%110,682 58.8%57,119 58.2% Unemployed 771,586 3.5%5,077 2.7%2,483 2.5% Not in Labor Force 7,768,365 34.9%71,984 38.3%38,411 39.1% Armed Forces 102,600 0.5%358 0.2%166 0.2% Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2016-2021) Page 65 of 223 17CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN INCOME AND HOUSEHOLDS Income for College Station and Brazos County residents tends to be lower than that for residents of the state as a whole. These numbers are greatly influenced by the large local student population. Undergraduate students in particular are more likely to receive financial compensation outside of traditional wages, in the form of scholarships, grants, loans, gifts, and parental financial support. Graduate students, on the other hand, may not receive as much parental financial support, but rather, depend on teaching or research assistantships or have a working spouse. The U.S. Census Bureau defines a household as “all the people who occupy a housing unit as their usual place of residence.” This definition includes unrelated individuals – like college students, for example – living together. There are 41,592 distinct households in College Station, 83,627 in Brazos County and 10,239,341 in the State of Texas. The Census Bureau delineates between family and nonfamily households, in which a family is defined as “a group of two or more people who reside together and who are related by birth, marriage, or adoption.” The table below illustrates the share of family and nonfamily households in each of the three geographies. Page 66 of 223 18CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Percentage of House Hold TypesComparative Overview 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Texas Brazos County College Station Family Households Nonfamily Households 69% 31% 55% 45% 48% 52% Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2016-2021) The City of College Station has a larger percentage of nonfamily households, very much unlike the county, and even more so the state. Most households in the State of Texas and Brazos County are family households (68.9% and 55.5%, respectively). Again, this difference is particularly influenced by unrelated, college-aged persons living together. College Station families have a comparable, and even slightly greater, median income than that of families in the county and state (see the table below). However, the income of College Station nonfamily households is much less than their counterparts. Combining the very low nonfamily income with the comparatively high number of nonfamily households creates a situation in which total household income of College Station is approximately 74.3% of the income of Texas households overall. Page 67 of 223 19CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN $100,000 $90,000 $80,000 $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $0 Texas $67,327 $80,498 $41,693 Brazos County $52,658 $76,765 $30,552 College Station $50,089 $86,323 $28,020 Households Families Nonfamily Households Households Families Nonfamily Households Median Family Income in the Past 12 MonthsComparative Overview Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year Estimates (2016-2021) The table below shows the median household income and the percentage change for College Station since 2013. College Station Household Income in the Past 12 Months Estimated Median Household Income Percent Change 2021 $50,089 5.5% 2020 $47,456 3.57% 2019 $45,820 6.65% 2018 $42,964 8.96% 2017 $39,430 8.11% 2016 $36,471 6.68% 2015 $34,186 2.25% 2014 $33,434 5.82% 2013 $31,596 Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year Estimates Page 68 of 223 20CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN The two tables below show estimated median household income for College Station nonfamily and family households as well as the percentage change since 2013. Estimated Median Nonfamily Household Income Percent Change 2021 $28,020 5.93 2020 $26,452 8.22 2019 $24,442 3.88 2018 $23,529 5.10 2017 $22,387 5.38 2016 $21,244 6.72 2015 $19,907 1.86 2014 $19,544 13.46 2013 $17,226 Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year Estimates Estimated Median Family Household Income Percent Change 2021 $86,323 6.84 2020 $80,795 -6.24 2019 $86,176 5.85 2018 $81,415 9.39 2017 $74,428 3.30 2016 $72,047 5.05 2015 $68,584 2.72 2014 $66,765 -0.31 2013 $66,974 Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year Estimates Page 69 of 223 21CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN This table shows estimated median household income for families with single parents (female and male householders with no spouse present) since 2013. Please note that the estimated median family income for these families is less than half of the median income for families in general. This estimated Census data show there are approximately 3,800 female householder families with no spouse present and 1,531 male householder families with no spouse present in College Station. Estimated Median Family Household Income - Single Householder No Spouse Present Percent Change Female HH Male HH Female HH Male HH 2021 $40,023 $40,135 0.82 24.91 2020 $39,697 $32,132 19.12 -35.74 2019 $33,325 $50,000 1.34 10.74 2018 $32,883 $45,150 14.93 12.03 2017 $28,612 $40,303 -7.69 35.71 2016 $30,995 $29,698 -0.63 6.82 2015 $31,192 $27,801 18.21 1.27 2014 $26,386 $27,451 -7.81 8.07 2013 $28,622 $25,400 Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year Estimates Page 70 of 223 22CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN WHERE DO COLLEGE STATION WORKERS LIVE? Inflow/Outflow According to the 2020 US Census, over 40,000 people commute into College Station for work. Most (40,981 of the 59,810 jobs in the City - 69%) of the jobs in the city are filled by non-residents. Page 71 of 223 23CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN The map below displays the inflow/outflow counts and proportions for the employees in College Station. Source: US Census Bureau, OnTheMap 2020 Inflow/Outflow Counts for All Jobs for College Station, Texas Source: US Census Bureau, OnTheMap 2020 Inflow/Outflow Counts for All Jobs for College Station, Texas Where Do College Station Workers Live? LEGEND Brazos County LimitsCity Limit College Station Worker HouseholdsJob_Count 1 2.5 5 10 25 50 75 100 Page 72 of 223 24CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Where Do College Station Workers Live? LEGEND Brazos County LimitsCity Limit College Station Worker Households 1 - 3 4 - 8 9 - 14 15 - 21 22 - 31 32 - 43 44 - 60 61 - 81 Source: US Census Bureau, OnTheMap 2020 Inflow/Outflow Counts for All Jobs for College Station, Texas A significant number of those employed in Brazos County live outside the County. Of the 106,234 jobs in Brazos County, 48,010 (45%) live outside the County and commute in. Source: US Census Bureau, OnTheMap 2020 Inflow/Outflow Counts for All Jobs for Brazos County, Texas Page 73 of 223 25CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN COLLEGE STATION HOUSING STOCK College Station is a young city with a housing stock that reflects our rapid growth. Data from the Brazos Central Appraisal District shows that of the 24,126 residential platted parcels (a unit of land (tract, lot, or otherwise) designated in the original plat or in any other plats with residential structure(s) present) in College Station 13,863 (57%) were built since 2000 - 17,359 (72%) since 1990. Also of note is the type of housing in College Station and when it was mostly built. 78% of residential platted parcels are single family homes. There are 191 apartment complexes in the City, with about 118,000 beds total (Data from the College Station Fire Department). Other housing options that typically make up “middle housing”, or alternatives to single family homes and apartment complexes (including manufactured homes, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, townhomes, patio homes, and homeplexs) represent 4,998 platted parcels, or 20% of the total. Page 74 of 223 26CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Total Number Average Year Constructed Residential Structures 24,126 1998 Single Family (A1, E1)18,922 1998 Manufactured Homes (A2, EA2, M1)23 1989 Duplex (A3, B2, EB2)1,441 1992 Triplex (B3)11 1984 Fourplex (A5, B4)348 1981 Condominium (A6)3 1996 Townhome (A7)2,355 2010 Patio Home (A8)486 2000 Homeplex (A9)331 1986 Multifamily (B1)191 1994 Fraternity/Sorority House (B10)15 1992 Source: Brazos Central Appraisal District Total Housing - Construction Year Source: Brazos Central Appraisal District 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 Page 75 of 223 27CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN PROJECTED HOUSING SUPPLY SHORTAGE The City of College Station Planning and Development Services Department has estimated that the total College Station population will reach 145,000 by the year 2030 – a growth rate of about 2% per year over the next ten years. Given production projections based on planned development, there is estimated to be a shortage of 4,162 units. What is housing affordability? Workforce or affordable housing is not a specific type of housing. Rather it is housing within the financial reach of community members across the full spectrum of incomes and budgets. Housing is generally considered affordable if a household spends no more than 30% of their income to live there. For renters this would include rent and utilities, for homeowners this includes mortgage payments, insurance, taxes, utilities, and HOA fees. Housing is considered "affordable"if a household spends no more than30% of their income to live there. Source: https://www.housingdata.org/toolbox/municipal-impacts FOOD CLOTHING EVERYTHING ELSE HOUSING Page 76 of 223 28CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Housing Cost Burden Households spending more than 30 percent of their monthly income on housing costs are considered “cost burdened.” Households spending more than 50 percent of their monthly income on housing costs are “severely cost burdened.” When households are housing cost burdened, money that would go to other things, such as bills, health care, food, or savings, is instead funneled toward housing costs, potentially leading to disruption of utilities, malnutrition, and an inability to prepare for emergencies or work toward a better future. According to American Community Survey Census data, approximately 58 percent of College Station renters and 18 percent of College Station owners with a mortgage are cost burdened – 35 percent of these same renters at 9 percent of the same owners are severely cost burdened. 15 percent of owners without a mortgage are cost burdened, 8 percent are severely cost burdened. Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year Estimates (2016-2021) Cost burden can also be looked at according to household income and whether the household is an owner or renter. Mobility •Renters are more likely to move within Brazos County than owners – 26.6% of renters moved vs 7.2% of owners. •Those with lower incomes are more likely to move than households with higher incomes. 8.9% Individuals making $75,000 a year or more moved within the county while 22.3% of individuals making $25,000-$34,000 annually made a move within Brazos County. Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year Estimates (2016-2021) Renters 25,095 Owners with Mortgage 9,208 Owners w/o Mortgage 5,877 Cost Burdened 15,095 1,728 901 Severely Cost Burdened 9,278 873 503 Page 77 of 223 29CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Homebuyer migration patterns using Freddie Mac’s automated underwriting system data show a population in pursuit of affordable housing. Buyers left large expensive metro areas going to smaller more affordable destinations at a rate three times greater than before the pandemic. Fast growing metro areas with a shortage of housing and high house price to income ratios eventually led to an increase in out- migration as homebuyers seek more affordable destinations. The Freddie Mac report can be found here. Housing Costs Housing costs are rising faster than incomes. Households across the income spectrum are affected by the lack of diverse and affordable housing options. The average College Station home price has grown by 73% since 2015 while the median family income has only increased by 25.86%. Source: Bryan-College Station Regional Multiple Listing Service and US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year Estimates Rents have gone up 25.44% since 2015, with the average monthly rent for a 2-bedroom unit being $970, a 3-bedroom unit being $1,620, and 4-bedroom being $2,004. While increases in rent have kept pace with increases in income during this time period, rents still remain high, especially for 3 and 4 bedroom units. Source: Multiple Listing Service and US Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year Estimates Page 78 of 223 30CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN New Construction Homes New Construction Townhomes $500,000 $450,000 $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 $0 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 $272,800 $315,800 $345,898 $364,450 $338,104 $363,750 $342,070 $465,001 $442,513 $327,500 $345,000 $207,400 $227,000 $235,950 $264,900 $252,000 $234,950$207,540 New Construction Median Sales Price for College Station Source: Bryan-College Station Regional Multiple Listing Service The above graph shows that the median sales price for a new construction single family home in College Station is $442,513 (134 listings of this type have sold in 2023 with an average of 187 days on the market). A household would need to make $125,665 annually to afford this home given a 30 year fixed rate mortgage at 8% interest, 20% down payment ($88,503) and 35% of their monthly income going to the total monthly house payment (principal, interest, taxes, and insurance). The median sales price for a new construction townhome in College Station is $345,000 (23 listings of this type have sold in 2023 with an average of 162 days on the market). A household would need to make $97,864 annually to afford this home given a 30 year fixed rate mortgage at 8% interest, 20% down payment ($69,000) and 35% of their monthly income going to the total monthly house payment (principal, interest, taxes, and insurance). New Construction Median Sales Price for Brazos County Source: Bryan-College Station Regional Multiple Listing Service New Construction Homes New Construction Townhomes $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 $0 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 $269,900 $311,950 $321,250 $315,679 $308,050 $289,900 $282,175 $335,700 $365,000 $327,500 $344,500 $207,400 $227,000 $238,000 $264,900 $252,000 $234,950 $207,540 Page 79 of 223 31CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN The above graph shows that the median sales price for a new construction single family home in Brazos County is $365,000 (458 listings of this type have sold in 2023 with an average of 167 days on the market). A household would need to make $103,567 annually to afford this home given a 30 year fixed rate mortgage at 8% interest, 20% down payment ($73,000) and 35% of their monthly income going to the total monthly house payment (principal, interest, taxes, and insurance). The median sales price for a new construction townhome in Brazos County is $344,500 (22 listings of this type have sold in 2023 with an average of 112 days on the market). A household would need to make $97,722 annually to afford this home given a 30 year fixed rate mortgage at 8% interest, 20% down payment ($68,900) and 35% of their monthly income going to the total monthly house payment (principal, interest, taxes, and insurance). Non-New Construction Median Sales Price for College Station The above graph shows that the median sales price for a non-new construction single family home in College Station is $389,000 (679 listings of this type have sold in 2023 with an average of 62 days on the market). A household would need to make $110,410 annually to afford this home given a 30 year fixed rate mortgage at 8% interest, 20% down payment ($77,800) and 35% of their monthly income going to the total monthly house payment (principal, interest, taxes, and insurance). The median sales price for a non-new construction townhome in College Station is $315,000 (105 listings of this type have sold in 2023 with an average of 47 days on the market). A household would need to make $89,310 annually to afford this home given a 30 year fixed rate mortgage at 8% interest, 20% down payment ($63,000) and 35% of their monthly income going to the total monthly house payment (principal, interest, taxes, and insurance). Single Family Townhome $450,000 $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 $0 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 $210,000 $227,500 $247,000 $250,000 $259,900 $264,350 $306,000 $355,000 $389,000 $293,750 $315,000 $176,255 $210,950 $213,000 $201,500 $208,700 $230,000$218,500 Page 80 of 223 32CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Single Family Townhome $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $0 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 $190,000 $209,250 $224,295 $227,000 $235,000 $241,000 $272,250 $315,000 $335,000 $286,000 $302,000 $172,900 $195,000 $206,000 $195,000 $200,000 $227,000$212,000 Non-New Construction Median Sales Price for Brazos County Source: Bryan-College Station Regional Multiple Listing Service The above graph shows that the median sales price for a non-new construction single family home in Brazos County is $335,000 (1,232 listings of this type have sold in 2023 with an average of 66 days on the market). A household would need to make $95,013 annually to afford this home given a 30 year fixed rate mortgage at 8% interest, 20% down payment ($67,000) and 35% of their monthly income going to the total monthly house payment (principal, interest, taxes, and insurance). The median sales price for a non-new construction townhome in Brazos County is $302,000 (137 listings of this type have sold in 2023 with an average of 47 days on the market). A household would need to make $85,606 annually to afford this home given a 30 year fixed rate mortgage at 8% interest, 20% down payment ($60,400) and 35% of their monthly income going to the total monthly house payment (principal, interest, taxes, and insurance). More detailed sales data for both Brazos County and the City of College Station from the Bryan-College Station Regional Multiple Listing Service can be found on cstx.gov/housingplan. This data includes additional housing types for both new and non-new construction. Page 81 of 223 33CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN The Effect of Rising Interest Rates on Purchasing Power Interest rates have risen sharply since the Federal Reserve started raising them to combat inflation in 2021. The average interest rate for a 30 year fixed rate mortgage in 2021 was 2.96%. Today, the average rate for the same product is 8.04%. 30yr. Fixed Rate Mortgage Rate Source: St. Louis Federal Reserve Monthly Mortgage Loan Principal and Interest Payments The monthly principal and interest payment (not including taxes and insurance) for a those purchasing a home and borrowing $250,000 from a mortgage lender is $1,192 with a 4% interest rate. That number jumps to $1,835 for the same loan with an 8% interest rate - a 54% increase. The median sales price for a non-new single-family home in College Station was $389,000 for 2023 (through October). With a 4% interest rate 30 year fixed rate mortgage and 20% downpayment ($77,800) a household would need an annual income of $82,057 to afford the home. With an 8% interest rate and identical mortgage loan, a household would need an annual income of $110,410 to afford the same home – 34.55% more income. 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 30yr. Fixed Rate Mortgage Rate 4.45 3.66 3.98 4.17 3.85 3.65 3.99 4.54 3.94 3.1 2.96 5.34 8.04 Loan Amount 4%5%6%7%8% $100,000 $477 $537 $600 $666 $734 $150,000 $715 $805 $900 $999 $1,101 $200,000 $954 $1,074 $1,200 $1,332 $1,462 $250,000 $1,192 $1,342 $1,500 $1,665 $1,835 Page 82 of 223 34CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Annual Mean Wage by Occupation for College Station Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics May 2022 Area Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates College Station-Bryan Home Purchase Price assumes a 30yr fixed rate mortgage at 8% interest rate and 20% down payment. Total monthly Principal, Interest, Taxes and Insurance payment is 30% of gross monthly income and 35% of gross monthly income. Annual Income Monthly Income Monthly Rent - 30% Home Purchase - 30% Home Purchase - 35% Childcare Workers $22,640 $1,886 $565 $70,000 $81,000 Cooks, Short Order $25,870 $2,155 $646 $79,500 $92,500 Phlebotomists $33,510 $2,793 $838 $103,000 $119,000 Pest Control Workers $34,780 $2,898 $869 $106,000 $123,500 Community Health Workers $39,270 $3,273 $982 $120,000 $140,000 Credit Counselors $41,070 $3,423 $1,026 $125,500 $146,000 Chefs and Head Cooks $44,880 $3,740 $1,122 $136,500 $158,500 Automotive Service Technicians and Mechanics $45,240 $3,770 $1,131 $138,000 $160,500 Child, Family, and School Social Workers $45,260 $3,772 $1,257 $138,000 $160,500 HVAC Mechanics and Installers $47,270 $3,939 $1,181 $144,000 $167,500 Paramedics $47,990 $3,999 $1,199 $146,000 $169,500 Paralegals and Legal Assistants $49,510 $4,125 $1,238 $151,000 $175,500 Clergy $51,670 $4,306 $1,292 $157,000 $183,000 Middle School Teachers $52,970 $4,414 $1,325 $161,000 $187,000 Chemists $67,600 $5,633 $1,690 $205,000 $240,000 Accountants and Auditors $76,490 $6,374 $1,912 $232,000 $270,000 Registered Nurses $78,180 $6,515 $1,955 $237,000 $277,000 Database Administrators $83,950 $6,996 $2,098 $254,000 $296,000 Electrical Engineers $91,960 $7,663 $2,298 $278,000 $323,000 Pharmacists $123,380 $10,282 $3,084 $372,000 $435,000 Page 83 of 223 35CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Case Study Jane Smith is a 35-year-old single mother of two. She formerly worked a low wage job earning $11 an hour ($22,880 annually) and received government assistance for rent, food, and medical care. As the recipient of a housing choice voucher to help pay her rent, Ms. Smith was eligible to enroll in the Brazos Valley Council of Government’s Family Self Sufficiency Program. As part of the program she set goals that included paying off debt, further education to get a better job, and the purchase of a home. She received financial coaching, made a budget and paid off debt, and got her GED and an associate degree. Ms. Smith graduated from the Program 5 years ago. She has since secured a higher paying job (earning $50,000 annually), become independent of all government assistance, and has saved over $20,000 towards the downpayment on a house. Ms. Smith has been pre-approved by a lender for a mortgage loan and can afford a purchase price of $180,000. She quickly becomes frustrated and discouraged while shopping for a home. Houses that were listed for $170,000 four years ago are now selling for $280,000. The median purchase price for non-new construction homes is $389,000. Even with the help of available down payment assistance programs, very few options exist in her price range and competition for them is fierce. She is considering giving up. Page 84 of 223 36CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Other Communities’ Housing Plans San Marcos, TX – SMTX 4 All – Housing Plan Denton, TX – Affordable Housing Strategic Toolkit Waco, TX – Waco Strategic Housing Plan Plano, TX – Housing Trend Analysis and Strategic Plan Irving. TX – City of Irving Housing Plan Grand Prairie, TX – 2021 Housing Strategy El Paso, TX – El Paso Regional Housing Plan Austin, TX – Austin Strategic Housing Blueprint Fort Worth, TX – Neighborhood Conservation Plan and Affordable Housing Strategy Dallas, TX – Dallas Comprehensive Housing Policy San Antonio, TX – Strategic Housing Implementation Plan Alexandria, VA – Housing Master Plan & Regional Housing Initiative Boise, ID - Housing Needs Analysis Chattanooga, TN – Housing Action Plan Nashville, TN – Affordable Housing Task Force Report Louisville, KY – My Louisville Home Puyallup, WA – Puyallup Housing Action Plan Tacoma, WA – Affordable Housing Action Strategy Mankato, MN – Affordable Housing Action Plan Omaha, NE – Housing Affordability Action Plan Juneau, AK – City and Borough of Juneau Housing Action Plan New York, NY – Housing New York Charlotte, NC – Housing Charlotte Framework Grafton, MA – Housing Trust Action Plan Page 85 of 223 37CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN GOALS/STRATEGIES/ACTIONSREPORT •Goal 1 - Create and incentivize more housing units and more diverse housing types by studying and creating a proposal for: ☐Strategy 1 – Selectively allow and encourage increased density ∙Action 1 – Amend the Unified Development Ordinance to allow for greater density and housing variety ∙Action 2 – Rezone certain areas to allow more density and housing variety ∙Action 3 – Create a process for expedited permitting and reduced or waived fees for affordable housing development ☐Strategy 2 – Encourage and allow infill development ∙Action 1 – Explore opportunities for infill development when amending the UDO or rezoning for greater density ∙Action 2 – Investigate allowing or promoting housing on unused institutional or public land ☐Strategy 3 – Encourage innovation and sustainability in housing construction ∙Action 1 – Create a program to encourage and incentivize alternative and energy-efficient building methods Page 86 of 223 38CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN •Goal 2 - Incentivize the production and preservation of housing that is affordable to current and future community members by studying and creating a proposal for: ☐Strategy 1 – Partner with community stakeholders to develop housing for their constituencies ∙Action 1 – Work with organizations to create employee / client housing programs ∙Action 2 – Create formal mechanisms to collaborate with Texas A&M, Brazos County, and City of Bryan to share data and achieve housing goals ☐Strategy 2 – Create programs to facilitate homeownership ∙Action 1 – Create a deed-restricted homeownership program ∙Action 2 – Pursue partnerships to construct affordable homeownership opportunities ∙Action 3 – Pursue tools to help households qualify for financing by helping them to become landlords (live in one half of duplex, etc…) ☐Strategy 3 – Create rental housing for income-qualified residents ∙Action 1 – Investigate the creation of a Municipal Housing Authority ∙Action 2 – Create an inter-generational home share program ☐Strategy 4 – Establish funding mechanisms to create affordable housing for rent or purchase ∙Action 1 – Create a density bonus system for new development meeting increased density goals ∙Action 2 – Create a Local Housing Finance Corporation ∙Action 3 – Partner with developers through Housing Public Facility Corporations ∙Action 4 – Partner with Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) developers ☐Strategy 5 – Preserve and enhance existing housing stock ∙Action 1 – Acquire and rehabilitate existing housing stock that is at risk of losing affordability ☐Strategy 6 – Prevent displacement of low and moderate-income homeowners ∙Action 1 - Create initiative to help homeowners without homestead exemptions to file ∙Action 2 – Refer homeowners to existing weatherization programs and possibly create new program ☐Strategy 7 – Provide education for tenants, homebuyers, and homeowners ∙Action 1 – Create a home maintenance education and training program ∙Action 2 – Create comprehensive homebuyer education training program ∙Action 3 – Create a tenant education and training program ☐Strategy 8 – Continue to seek stakeholder and citizen feedback and direction on Housing Action Plan implementation ∙Action 1 – Create a Housing Action Plan Implementation Committee ∙Action 2 – The Housing Plan Oversight Committee and City staff will prepare an annual progress report Page 87 of 223 39CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN This plan proposes to accomplish Comprehensive Plan Action Items 2.3, 3.4, 3.6, and 3.9 by using a goal, strategy, and action framework to create or incentivize additional housing units of diverse types and affordable housing opportunities for residents. Each goal will tie back to one or more Comprehensive Plan Action Items. Strategies will fall under each goal and specific actions will be listed under each strategy. Implementation of the Housing Action Plan is anticipated to take seven to ten years. Implementation of the strategies and actions in the following section must be completed to meet the goals of the plan. Plan implementation is broken down into three time frames – short-term (1-2 years), mid-term (3-6 years), and long-term (7-10 years). Programs and policies aimed at providing affordable and workforce housing, along with encouraging unit production and a mix of housing types for all demographics and lifestyles, will be essential to maintain viable and strong neighborhoods that serve all College Station citizens. There are two main overarching goals of the Housing Action Plan – to produce more housing units of various types to meet growing demand and to produce and preserve housing that is affordable to community members. GOALS, STRATEGIES, ACTIONS Page 88 of 223 40CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN •Action 2.3 – Create incentives and programs to revitalize existing areas and established neighborhoods. This could include façade or landscaping improvement programs or rehabilitation initiatives. New programs should align with and complement existing City efforts through the Neighborhood Partnership Program, Neighborhood Grant Program, and proposed property maintenance programming. •Action 3.4 – Expand affordable housing and workforce housing. Continue to support efforts, programs, and incentives aimed at developing affordable housing stock and assisting low- and moderate-income citizens to secure affordable homeownership and/or rental opportunities. Potential actions may include regulatory provisions such as: o Development standards that reduce barriers for affordable and diverse housing types. o Pre-approved building plans or pattern books for target locations. o Incentives such as density bonuses or more flexible standards, or o A workforce housing capital pool where a public entity establishes a fund that is used for various types of affordable housing initiatives. •Action 3.6 - Develop and refine data monitoring processes to analyze housing trends and define a strategic set of actions to address housing affordability, diversity, and gentrification. Consider existing market data, best practices, and existing regulations and incentives. •Action 3.9 – Continue partnering with local nonprofit organizations and area partners to support affordable housing options. Continue partnerships with organizations such as the Brazos County Home Repair Coalition, Bryan/College Station Habitat for Humanity, Brazos Valley Community Action Programs, Elder Aid, Brazos Valley Council of Governments, and housing tax credit developers. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ACTION ITEMS Page 89 of 223 41CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN GOALS •Create and incentivize more housing units and more diverse housing types •Incentivize the production and preservation of housing that is affordable to current and future community members •Goal 1 – Create and incentivize more housing units and more diverse housing types (Comp. Plan Actions 3.4, 3.6, & 3.9). Building new housing will address the projected housing shortfall (See Housing Action Plan Existing Conditions Report Pg. 28). Ensuring the opportunity for greater diversity in the types of housing that are built will afford current and future residents (using the Census definition of residence: the place where a person lives and sleeps most of the time) housing opportunities that are not currently available, as most housing units in the City are either single family or multifamily (See Existing Conditions Report Pg. 26). As demand in the housing market is outpacing supply, creating more units in this strategic fashion will create market-driven cost stabilization and reductions through an increase in supply and supply diversity. The increases in density required to create more housing units can be leveraged for affordable housing (housing for those at or below certain income levels for below market prices) by requiring new developments to provide affordability in exchange for density. Innovative building technologies and techniques will be encouraged to increase housing density and affordability. Access to amenities and accessory services (retail, entertainment, food, etc.) and adequacy of city services such as drainage, sewage, and transportation, will be examined for infill and new development. Page 90 of 223 42CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN ☐Strategy 1 – Selectively allow and encourage increased density (zoning relief and administrative adjustments to incentivize targeted development) - increased density should be sought when it can be supported with appropriate standards, infrastructure and services, and impacts can be managed appropriately. Increased density should support the creation of neighborhoods with a diverse range of housing stock that supports the needs of various life stages, abilities, and age groups including patio homes for aging homeowners to be able to downsize and housing for persons with disabilities. Elements of both new and existing zoning such as minimum lot size and minimum parking requirements should be evaluated. ∙Action 1 – Amend the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) to allow for greater density and housing variety (smaller lot sizes, decreased setbacks, etc.). Planning and Development Services (P&DS) will investigate appropriate changes to the UDO to achieve greater density and housing variety. This will be accomplished in the next 2-3 years. Not to be pursued in neighborhood conservation areas. ∙Action 2 – Rezone certain areas to allow more density and housing variety. P&DS will engage with the public and stakeholders to determine where increased density would be feasible and desirable. Over the next 2-3 years P&DS will bring forward rezonings of these areas to achieve this goal. ∙Action 3 – Create processes offering expedited permitting and reduced or eliminated City development fees for projects that provide affordable housing units that are rented or sold below market rates and restricted to low- and moderate-income households. P&DS staff will investigate appropriate changes to the Fee Schedule and make recommendations for changes. This will be accomplished in the next 2-3 years. ☐Strategy 2 – Encourage and allow infill development using vacant land and repurposing lots and buildings. Changes to zoning or the UDO allowing infill opportunities should ensure building standards that fit within existing neighborhoods. ∙Action 1 - Opportunities for infill development will be explored in the first two actions in this section to allow greater density through amendment of the UDO and rezoning of certain areas. Possibilities could include small home communities or accessory dwelling units. This will be accomplished in the next 2-3 years. ∙Action 2 – Investigate allowing or promoting housing on unused institutional/public land. Work with partners to investigate the potential for housing to be developed on unused or excess land. This will be accomplished in the next 3-4 years. ☐Strategy 3 – Encourage innovation and sustainability in housing construction. Alternative and sustainable building methods will be supported and encouraged, especially in the development of affordable housing. ∙Action 1 – P&DS and the Community Services Department will create a program to encourage and incentivize alternative and energy-efficient building methods with a focus on affordable housing. These could include but are not limited to modular construction, 3D printed units, mass timber, carbon neutral building materials, etc… Incentives for efficient, innovative construction and design will be explored. Staff will assess the limitations in city codes, workflows, permitting, and inspections that will need revision to encourage this type of development. This will be accomplished in the next 3-5 years. Page 91 of 223 43CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN •Goal 2 – Incentivize the production and preservation of housing that is affordable to community members (Comp. Plan Actions 2.3, 3.4, 3.6, & 3.9). Housing currently affordable to low- and moderate- income residents should be preserved. Additional affordable housing opportunities for low- and moderate-income residents will be created. This will be accomplished by implementing mechanisms to help fund affordable housing, by creating specific housing programs to meet housing needs across the low- and moderate-income spectrum, by leveraging new development to create affordable units, and by advocating for local affordable housing development and activities. Affordable housing development should be supported with sufficient transportation infrastructure to ensure resident success. ☐Strategy 1 - Partner with community stakeholders to develop housing for their constituencies. ∙Action 1 - Work with organizations and businesses to create housing for their employees through a client or employee housing program. The City will develop a program to assist employers with developing and securing financing for low and moderate income housing opportunities. This program will seek to leverage private resources in the provision of affordable workforce housing. The Community Services Department will develop this program in the next 2-3 years. ∙Action 2 – Create formal mechanisms to collaborate with Texas A&M University, Blinn College, Brazos County, and the City of Bryan to share data, achieve housing goals, and advocate for changes needed to implement housing goals. The City will actively seek to establish and strengthen partnerships with Texas A&M University around shared and mutually beneficial housing goals and actions. This effort will begin immediately with formal mechanisms being created in the next 1-3 years. Page 92 of 223 44CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN ☐Strategy 2 – Create programs to facilitate homeownership for working families / Advance new home ownership models. The production of housing units for affordable homeownership opportunities using alternative and energy-efficient building methods should be supported and encouraged. ∙Action 1 – Create a deed-restricted homeownership program. Create a program to assist income-eligible families to purchase homes by providing downpayment assistance. Deed restrictions will be placed on purchased homes to ensure resale to income-eligible families at prices pre-determined through appreciation formulas. Community Services Staff will create this program in the next 1-2 years. ∙Action 2 – Pursue partnerships with nonprofit and for-profit organizations to construct affordable homeownership opportunities using CDBG, HOME, or other funding sources. This will be accomplished in the next 1-3 years. ∙Action 3 – Pursue tools to assist with the financing of affordable homeownership such as the purchase of a duplex with the buyer residing in one half and using rental income from the other half to help qualify for financing or the construction of an accessory dwelling unit that could be used to generate rental income to qualify for financing. The rental units could be designated as affordable for low- and moderate-income households. Community Services Staff will investigate these methods and make a recommendation regarding their inclusion in homebuyer assistance models in the next 1-3 years. ☐Strategy 3 – Create rental housing for income-qualified residents. The City should partner with for-profit and nonprofit developers to create affordable housing opportunities for income- qualified residents. Available funding mechanisms and the creation of affordable rental housing through allowing more dense development through density bonuses should be pursued. Examine amenities such as retail, food, and transportation and city services like sewage and drainage to ensure sufficiency in areas where density is being considered. ∙Action 1 – Community Services Department staff will investigate the creation of a Municipal Housing Authority to provide rental housing opportunities for households making at or below 80% of the area median income. A recommendation will be made in the next 1-3 years. ∙Action 2 – Community Services Department staff will work with local partners to create an inter-generational home share program. This program will match homeowners with extra space with students in search of affordable housing. This program will be created in 2-3 years. ☐Strategy 4 – Establish funding mechanisms to create affordable housing for rent or purchase. Increased density should be leveraged when possible to create affordable housing opportunities. Staff will continuously evaluate new funding opportunities as they arise and recommend them when appropriate. ∙Action 1 – create a density bonus system for new development meeting increased density goals. In exchange for increased density, lower parking requirements, or other incentives above a base allowed level, developers will either create affordable units in their new development that are for sale or rent to income-eligible households at affordable prices or they will pay a fee that will be used to create affordable housing opportunities elsewhere. Prior to re-zoning, staff will conduct an analysis of the appropriate unit or fee in lieu of unit levels. Where appropriate, these will be part of rezoning efforts. This will be accomplished in the next 1-3 years. Page 93 of 223 45CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN ∙Action 2 – Create a Local Housing Finance Corporation (HFC) to help finance affordable single-family and multi-family developments. Revenue generated by lending activity will be used to achieve other affordable housing goals. Community Services Staff will pursue the creation of this entity with creation occurring in 3-5 years. ∙Action 3 – Partner with developers to create affordable rental housing through the creation of Housing Public Facility Corporations. The developer would offer affordable rental units for low- and moderate-income families in exchange for being exempt from all local property tax obligations. Community Services Staff will pursue these partnerships with the goal of 1 yearly for the next 5 years. ∙Action 4 – Partner with Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) developers to secure awards of 9% tax credits to bring additional affordable rental housing to College Station. Investigate partnerships using 4% credits to produce affordable rental housing. Community Services Staff will contact LIHTC developers to seek partnerships. This will be pursued annually. ☐Strategy 5 – Preserve and enhance existing housing stock. ∙Action 1 – The Community Services Department will use grant funds or other available funds to acquire and rehabilitate affordable housing units that are at risk of losing their affordability. This will be done directly by the Community Services Department or through nonprofit partners. These units will be made available to income-eligible households at below market rates as either rental or homeownership opportunities. This program will be created in the next 1-2 years. ☐Strategy 6 – Prevent displacement of low- and moderate-income homeowners. ∙Action 1 – Create initiative to help homeowners without homestead exemptions to file their homestead exemption. The Community Services Department will work with the Public Communications Department and other relevant stakeholders to create coordinated outreach efforts and an awareness campaign in 1-2 years. ∙Action 2 – Create awareness and, where eligible, refer homeowners to existing weatherization programs such as the Brazos Valley Community Action Programs (BVCAP) Weatherization Program or the City’s existing Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funded Minor Home Repair Program. Community Services Department staff will investigate the need for additional weatherization assistance and make a recommendation in 1-2 years. ☐Strategy 7 – Provide education for tenants, landlords, homebuyers, and homeowners to help ensure success. ∙Action 1 – Community Services Staff will work with partners to create a home maintenance education and training program in 2-3 years. ∙Action 2 – Community Services Staff will build on the City’s current home buyer education offerings and will work with local partners to create a comprehensive homebuyer education program. This program will equip participants regarding fundamental financial components of homeownership like budgeting, credit, mortgage lending, shopping for a home, and the closing process and will be created in 1-3 years. Page 94 of 223 46CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN ∙Action 3 – The Community Services Department will work with partners and community stakeholders to create a rental education program. This program will equip participants with information about community resources and skills necessary to fulfill tenant and landlord responsibilities. The Community Services Department will develop this program in the next 1-3 years. ☐Strategy 8 – Continue to seek stakeholder and citizen feedback and direction in the implementation of the Housing Action Plan. P&DS and Community Services Department staff will work to ensure future planning efforts such as transportation and capital improvements consider the goals of the Housing Action Plan in their future planning efforts. ∙Action 1 – Create a Housing Plan Oversight Committee to provide guidance, support, and direction in the execution of the plan. The Committee would meet at least quarterly and would be established within a year of the Housing Action Plan’s adoption. ∙Action 2 – The Housing Plan Oversight Committee and City staff will prepare an annual progress report. This will ensure that the Plan is consistently reviewed and that any needed modifications are identified for amendment. Consistent assessment of the relationship between the Plan, the City’s implementing ordinances, and regulations is an essential part of this effort. Page 95 of 223 47CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN City of College Station Housing Action Plan Goals, Strategies, and Actions Summary At the July 16, 2024 public meeting each Goal, Strategy, And Action was printed on a poster and placed on the wall of the City Hall Bush 4141 Community Room. After a brief presentation of the Housing Action Plan by City staff, each of the 24 attendees to the meeting were given green, yellow, and red sticker dots and asked to place one dot on each Goal, Strategy, and Action. Green indicated that they approved of, or liked the item, yellow indicated they were neutral, and red indicated they did not like or were against the item. Attendees were invited to also write comments on each poster. Below is a summary of the results of this exercise. •Green Dots •Yellow Dots •Red Dots PUBLIC MEETING FEEDBACK - JULY 16, 2024 Page 96 of 223 48CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Goal 1 - Create more housing units and more diverse housing types COMMENTS: • New construction increases costs. • Fix the old and preserve neighborhood quality. • Increase density and affordability very obvious-many samples of failure nationwide. • Action 1&2 - Research doesn’t necessarily bear out that increased density equals increased affordability. • Goal 1 Action 2 Utility-flood impact? • Action 1 & 2 are contradictory. • Action 5 - Need matrix defining affordability. • Strategy 1 - Why are we increasing density when apartments aren’t at capacity? • Strategy 1 – Who is looking at the architecture of the new builds? They should fit the existing neighborhood. The new build on Highland (in progress) is a complete disappointment. • No mention of impervious cover percentages/restrictions on any of these plans overall. • Goal 1 should be to produce and preserve affordable housing to current and future housing. • Goal 2 should be to create more housing units and.. • Strategy 2 Action 1 – I am opposed to developing neighborhoods consisting of tiny homes. • Strategy 3 – Fluff, ill-defined. • Strategy 3 – Current developers seem focused on putting up quick/cheaply built structures. Anything to encourage quality would be a plus. • Incentivize efficient buildings being built, not the efficiency of the action of building. • Strategy 3 – define. °Strategy 1 – Selectively allow increased density ∙Action 1 – Amend the Unified Development Ordinance to allow for greater density and housing variety•6 •3 ∙Action 2 – Rezone certain areas to allow more density and housing variety •5 ∙Action 3 – Create parking requirement reductions or exemptions •1 •1 •7 ∙Action 4 – Create pre-approved building plans and development patterns•2 •2 •2 ∙Action 5 – Create a process for expedited permitting and reduced or waived fees for affordable housing development •2 •1 Page 97 of 223 49CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN °Strategy 2 – Encourage and allow infill development •3 •2 •1 ∙Action 1 – Explore opportunities for infill development when amending the UDO or rezoning for greater density •3 •2 •5 ∙Action 2 – Investigate allowing or promoting housing on unused institutional or public land •11 °Strategy 3 – Encourage innovation and sustainability in housing construction •2 •2 •1 ∙Action 1 – Create a program to encourage and incentivize alternative and energy-efficient building methods •2 •6 Goal 2 - Produce and preserve housing that is affordable to current and future community members COMMENTS: • Goal 2 should be To create more housing units and….. • Rather than focus on homeownership, focus on housing affordability regardless of owner or renters. • Goal 2 Action 3 – Risky-new homeowners could lose everything! • Feasible? If I’m working hard to make ends meet. I may not want to also have to supervise tenants. • Strategy 1 Action 3 – Awesome idea-HFH could help! • Strategy 1 Action 1 – Permanent deed restrictions can’t adapt when the city changes throughout the years and decades. • Strategy 2 Action 2 – Do this! Awesome idea! • Strategy 3 Action 1 – Simply allow the density instead of gating it behind conditions. If more units are needed and the neighborhoods can bear the density as grown by the fact that its offered, just allow the more units to be built. This is better than nothing. Status quo<Proposal<Blanket Upzone. • Strategy 3 Action 3 – Are these exemptions permanent? Example 20 years? • Strategy 3 Action 3 - Rather than exempt ALL property taxes, just exempt improvements. This keeps all the incentives to build quality & dense housing but prevents the market rate units to balloon in price while the city gets nothing as the city grows & areas become more desirable. • Strategy 4 Action 1 – Your employer should not also be your landlord. Affordable housing city wide should allow such employees the freedom to choose where they want to live. • Strategy 4 Action 2 – Texas A&M has no significant skin in the game with regard to on-campus housing, yet they place an out-sized demand on city resources. Why do we all this? • Strategy 4 Action 2 – This didn’t work in the past-too much leverage on employee by employer. Page 98 of 223 50CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN • Strategy 4 Action 2 – Texas A&M, sure but that’s like pulling teeth. • Strategy 5 Action 1 – Well beyond city’s expertise. • Strategy 6 Action 2 – My low-income friends don’t perceive of this as being helpful enough. This is why education is important. • Strategy 7 – Are existing productive & well attended? • Strategy 7 Action 3 – What are the landlord’s responsibilities with regard to tenants? °Strategy 1 – Create programs to facilitate homeownership ∙Action 1 – Create a deed-restricted homeownership program. •8 •1 ∙Action 2 – Pursue partnerships to construct affordable homeownership opportunities •7 •1 ∙Action 3 – Pursue tools to help households qualify for financing by helping them to become landlords (live in one half of duplex, etc…) •5 •4 °Strategy 2 – Create rental housing for income-qualified residents ∙Action 1 – Investigate the creation of a Municipal Housing Authority •2 •1 •3 ∙Action 2 - Create an inter-generational home share program •5 °Strategy 3 – Establish funding mechanisms to create affordable housing for rent or purchase ∙Action 1 – Create a density bonus system for new development meeting increased density goals •2 •4 ∙Action 2 – Create a Local Housing Finance Corporation •4 •3 ∙Action 3 – Partner with developers through Housing Public Facility Corporations •2 •3 •1 ∙Action 4 – Partner with Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) developers •6 Page 99 of 223 51CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN °Strategy 4 – Partner with community stakeholders to develop housing for their constituency •1 •1 ∙Action 1 – Work with organizations to create employee / client housing programs •6 •1 •3 ∙Action 2 – Create formal mechanisms to collaborate with Texas A&M, Brazos County, and City of Bryan to share data and achieve housing goals •10 •1 °Strategy 5 – Preserve and enhance existing housing stock – Green dots=3 ∙Action 1 – Acquire and rehabilitate existing housing stock that is at risk of losing affordability •7 •2 •1 °Strategy 6 – Prevent displacement of low and moderate-income homeowners •6 ∙Action 1 - Create initiative to help homeowners without homestead exemptions to file •5 •2 ∙Action 2 – Refer homeowners to existing weatherization programs and possibly create new program •3 •2 °Strategy 7 – Provide education for tenants, homebuyers, and homeowners •5 •1 ∙Action 1 – Create a home maintenance education and training program •6 •2 •1 ∙Action 2 – Create comprehensive homebuyer education training program •6 •2 •1 ∙Action 3 – Create a tenant education and training program – Green dots=4, Yellow dots=2, Red dots=1 •4 •2 •1 °Strategy 8 – Continue to seek stakeholder and citizen feedback and direction on Housing Action Plan implementation •4 ∙Action 1 – Create a Housing Action Plan Implementation Committee •7 •4 Page 100 of 223 52CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN OTHER THOUGHTS AND IDEAS: Make sure low-income housing is distributed evenly throughout the city not concentrated. Not much reference to specific intended areas or zoning types. Hope to see more of that moving forward! Utilize Midtown Industrial Park which has no demand & no available workforce for affordable housing. Multi-tenant housing and single-family housing are incompatible. Strengthen support of HOA deed restrictions. Goal 2 should be Goal 1 and Goal 1 should become Goal 2 – it matters. What is the plan to hold A&M’s and Blinn’s feet to the fire with regard to helping by adding significant on- campus housing? Goal 2, Strategy 3, Action 3: I believe tax exemptions should have an expiration date. Selectively allow increased density-be careful with this. If you rule certain neighborhoods off limits close to A&M, you might as well not do density at all. Recommendation-allow “gentle-fication” – allow every neighborhood parcel to increase in density one level. SFH, townhomes, tri-plex, etc. Would also avoid the otherwise unavoidable consequence of looking like you’re only pushing density in poorer neighborhoods with no political power. Page 101 of 223 53CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN The public input process was designed to understand the housing needs, choices, and preferences of people who live, work, or go to school in the City of College Station. Input was gathered through three separate surveys, two public meetings, and two builder/developer focus groups. Each of the following surveys opened on February 15, 2024, and closed on April 5, 2024: •General Survey – 712 responses •Student Survey – 1,637 responses •Employer Survey – 53 responses An additional survey to gather feedback on the Draft Goals, Strategies, Actions Report of the Housing Action Plan opened on July 1, 2024 and closed on August 19, 2024. This survey had 147 responses. Survey results and analysis follow as part of this section. Four public meetings were also held with 48 community members attending: •The first was on March 21, 2024 at the College Station MTF Assembly Room at 1601 Graham Rd. •The second was on March 26, 2024 in the City of College Station City Council Chambers. •The third was on July 16, 2024 in the City Hall Bush 4141 Community Room. •The fourth was a virtual meeting held on July 17, 2024. Additionally, two builder/developer focus groups were held in partnership with the Greater Brazos Valley Builders Association. The Housing Action Plan Sterring Committee and City Staff used data gathered through the public participation process to inform the development of the Goals, Strategies, Actions Section of the Housing Action Plan. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION SUMMARY Page 102 of 223 54CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN GENERAL HOUSING SURVEY SURVEY RESULTS Q1- What is your zip code? Answered: 712 Skipped: 0 Page 103 of 223 55CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q2- Do you work inside the College Station city limits? ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes 63.48%452 No, I commute elsewhere for work 10.67%76 I am retired 16.43%117 I am not currently employed 3.93%28 I work remotely from home 5.48%39 TOTAL 712 Yes No, I commute elsewhere for work I am retired I am not currentlyemployed I work remotelyfrom home 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answered: 712 Skipped: 0 Page 104 of 223 56CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q3 - How many people in your household fall into the following age groups, including yourself? Answered: 712 Skipped: 0 ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Under 18 43.96%313 18 to 35 46.07%328 36 to 55 47.89%341 55 to 65 26.54%189 Over 65 27.39%195 Q4 - Which of the following best describes your household? ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES None of the above 0.56%4 Adult living alone 16.29%116 Couple with no child(ren) living with you 33.01%235 Couple with child(ren) living with you 35.67%254 Single parent with child(ren) living with you 7.02%50 Unrelated adults/roommates 7.44%53 TOTAL 712 None of the above Adult living alone Couple with nochildren living w/you Couple with child(ren) living with you Single parent with child(ren)living with you Unrelated adults/roommates 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answered: 712 Skipped: 0 Page 105 of 223 57CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q5 - Do you own the place you live in or rent? ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Own 65.17%464 Own my mobile home but rent my lot 0.84%6 Rent 33.99%242 TOTAL 712 Q6 - Do you have a mortgage? ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes 64.86%299 No 35.14%162 TOTAL 461 Own Own my mobile homebut rent my lot Rent 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answered: 712 Skipped: 0 Yes No 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answered: 461 Skipped: 251 Page 106 of 223 58CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q7 - Which of the following best describes the housing you live in? ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Single-family house 69.33%339 Duplex/triplex/townhome (shares walls with other dwellings)12.68%62 Apartment building 14.31%70 Mobile/manufactured home/trailer 1.43%7 Accessory dwelling unit (a smaller detached unit located on the same lot as a single family home) 0.20%1 A rented room in a single family home 0.82%4 Other, not listed (please specify)1.23%6 TOTAL 489 Single-family house Duplex/triplex/townhome Apartment building Mobile/manufactured Accessory dwelling unit A rented room in asingle family home Other, not listed 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answered: 489 Skipped: 223 Page 107 of 223 59CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q8 - How long have you lived at your address? ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Less than 1 year 14.11%69 1-3 years 26.79%131 4-6 years 20.04%98 7-10 years 11.86%58 10-20 years 15.54%76 20-30 years 6.54%32 30-40 years 3.07%15 More than 40 years 2.04%10 TOTAL 489 Less than 1 year 1-3 years 4-6 years 7-10 years 10-20 years 20-30 years 30-40 years More than 40 years 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answered: 489 Skipped: 223 Page 108 of 223 60CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q9 - Which factors were most important to you when choosing the place in which you live? Please select the five most important factors ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Cost/I could afford it 85.89%420 Close to work/job opportunities 37.63%184 Close to public transit 4.91%24 Close to family and friends 20.86%102 Close to quality schools for my children 34.36%168 Close to Texas A&M University 18.61%91 Number of bedrooms/size of home 65.24%319 Like type of home/apartment/townhouse/duplex, etc.19.84%97 Good investment for rent or future resale 19.22%94 Safety of neighborhood/community 70.55%345 Amenities (pool, gym, laundry, community room)6.54%32 Allows pets 24.95%122 Want to live near people like me 9.82%48 Needed a place to live quickly 13.50%66 Condition (upkeep, amenities, quality of appliances/finishes, etc.)30.47%149 Proximity to services (church, schools, transit, retail areas, parks, etc.)26.99%132 Other (please specify)10.63%52 TOTAL 489 Cost/I could aord it Close to work/job opportunities Close to public transit Close to family and friends Close to quality schools for my children Close to Texas A&M University Number of bedrooms/size of home Like type of home Good investment for rent or future resale Safety of neighborhood/community Amenities Allows pets Want to live near people like me Needed a place to live quickly Condition Proximity to services Other 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answered: 489 Skipped: 223 Page 109 of 223 61CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q10 - If you were to move in the next five years, what type of housing would best suit your needs? Select all that apply. Newly constructed/remodeled home Home with larger yard Home with smaller yard Home within walking distance to bus Home with more walkable neighborhood Home that is closer to restaurants/social activities/nightlife Home that is closer to grocery/pharmacy Single level home/condo/apartment—no stairs Home that is closer to work Larger home (more bedrooms or living space) Downsize/smaller home More aordable home I rent and want to own I own and want to rent Retirement community or seniors-only development Assisted living facility I plan to move in with family Don't know My current home suits my needs—moving for other reasons Other 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answered: 489 Skipped: 223 Page 110 of 223 62CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Newly constructed/remodeled home 30.47%149 Home with larger yard 33.74%165 Home with smaller yard 11.25%55 Home within walking distance to bus 6.34%31 Home with more walkable neighborhood 32.11%157 Home that is closer to restaurants/social activities/nightlife 10.02%49 Home that is closer to grocery/pharmacy 15.75%77 Single level home/condo/apartment—no stairs 24.13%118 Home that is closer to work 14.93%73 Larger home (more bedrooms or living space)26.58%130 Downsize/smaller home 15.34%75 More affordable home 32.92%161 I rent and want to own 24.95%122 I own and want to rent 0.82%4 Retirement community or seniors-only development 10.63%52 Assisted living facility 2.25%11 I plan to move in with family 1.43%7 Don't know 3.27%16 My current home suits my needs—I plan to move for other reasons (specify below)14.31%70 Other (please specify)18.61%91 TOTAL 489 Page 111 of 223 63CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q11 - What is keeping you from buying a home? Select all that apply. ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES I am not interested in buying a home 25.97%127 I don’t have the required money for the down payment and/or closing costs 35.99%176 My credit score is too low 10.22%50 I don’t want to take on the maintenance responsibility associated with owning property 6.13%30 I worry about property taxes and/or other expenses that come with owning a home 31.70%155 The available housing in the area is not affordable 47.24%231 The available housing in the area doesn’t meet my needs 12.27%60 I don’t know enough about how to buy a home 7.36%36 I don’t know if I can afford it long term on my current income 22.09%108 My employment is unstable or jeopardized 3.89%19 Other (please specify)24.74%121 TOTAL 489 I am not interested in buying a home I don’t have the required money for the down payment and/or closing costs My credit score is too low I don’t want to take on the maintenanceresponsibility associated with owning property I worry about property taxes and/or otherexpenses that come with owning a home The available housing in the area is not aordable The available housing in the area doesn’t meet my needs I don’t know enough about how to buy a home I don’t know if I can aord it long term on my current income My employment is unstable or jeopardized Other 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answered: 489 Skipped: 223 Page 112 of 223 64CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q12 - We would like to collect data on your experience with displacement, if you have experienced any. There are several types of displacement: • Exclusion: being excluded from living in a desirable neighborhood due to a lack of housing options you can afford • Physical Displacement: having to leave your home because it was being sold, renovated, or redeveloped; it was in an unlivable condition; or you were evicted • Economic Displacement: having to leave your home because you can no longer afford rent or mortgage or you can no longer afford/access your daily needs like a grocery store, public transit, etc. • Cultural Displacement: leaving your neighborhood because you can no longer afford or access your cultural needs such as culturally appropriate stores or spaces Based on the definitions provided, have you experienced the following situations while living in College Station? Select all that apply. ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Exclusion 27.40%134 Physical Displacement 6.75%33 Economic Displacement 13.29%65 Cultural Displacement 2.04%10 I have no experience with these 61.35%300 I prefer not to say 4.09%20 TOTAL 489 Exclusion Physical Displacement Economic Displacement Cultural Displacement I have no experience with these I prefer not to say 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answered: 489 Skipped: 223 Page 113 of 223 65CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q13 - If you you and/or the head of your household is employed in College Station but live outside the City of College Station, why? Select all that apply. ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES I live and work in College Station, so this question does not apply to me 65.64%321 Cost is lower where I live 14.93%73 Lifestyle is better where I live 4.91%24 I am close to family/friends where I live 2.86%14 I prefer the schools where I live 1.43%7 Other (please specify)21.68%106 TOTAL 489 I live and work in College Station,so this question does not apply to me Cost is lower where I live Lifestyle is better where I live I am close to family/friends where I live I prefer the schools where I live Other (please specify) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answered: 489 Skipped: 223 Page 114 of 223 66CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q14 - Solutions to housing and affordability challenges often involve adding more housing options to communities and neighborhoods. This section will ask you to indicate which housing types and for which resident groups are most appropriate in your current neighborhood, other neighborhoods in College Station, or nowhere in College Station. Indicate if the following types of housing are appropriate in your neighborhood, other neighborhoods in College Station, or not appropriate anywhere in College Station. * An accessory dwelling unit is a smaller, independent residential dwelling unit located on the same lot as a stand-alone (i.e., detached) single-family home. ** A manufactured home, sometimes referred to as a mobile home or trailer, are houses completely constructed in a factory and built on a fixed, steel chassis (rather than a permanent foundation). Manufactured homes are built to a national building code administered by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development. *** A modular home is built offsite in a factory and assembled on a permanent foundation. Modular homes are built to all applicable state and local building codes. My neighborhood 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answered: 489 Skipped: 223 Page 115 of 223 67CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Other neighborhoods 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answered: 489 Skipped: 223 Not Appropriate Anywhere 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answered: 489 Skipped: 223 Page 116 of 223 68CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLANDUPLEXESTRIPLEXESTOWNHOMESAPARTMENTBUILDINGSUP TO 3 STORIESNEARMAJORROADS APARTMENTBUILDINGSWITH MORETHAN 3STORIESNEARMAJORROADS TINYHOMES(>500SQ.FT.) SEPARATEACCESSORYDWELLINGUNITS*,ATTACHEDANDUNATTACHED My Neighborhood 47.70% 176 25.75% 95 52.30% 193 31.98% 118 13.82% 51 22.76% 84 42.28% 156 Other Neighborhoods 72.08% 302 55.85% 234 78.76% 330 65.63% 275 50.60% 212 51.79% 217 53.22% 223 Not Appropriate Anywhere 7.84% 21 16.79% 45 4.48% 12 17.16% 46 36.57% 98 35.45% 95 28.36% 76 Duplexes Triplexes Townhomes Apartment Apartments Tiny Homes Separate Accessory Accessory Manufactured/Mobile Homes Modula Homes Page 117 of 223 69CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q15 - On a scale of 1 to 9, where 9 means extremely important and 1 is not at all important, how important is it to you that College Station’s housing supply includes the following types of homes? Starter homes for ﬁrst-time homebuyers 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answered: 489 Skipped: 223 Apartments for young adults working or starting families in College Station 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Page 118 of 223 70CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Apartments, condos, and neighborhoods that appeal to millennials or young adults 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Apartments, condos, and neighborhoods that appeal to seniors 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Housing that meets the needs of residents looking to downsize 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Page 119 of 223 71CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Housing that meets the needs of residents losing mobility and needing housing with no stairs 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Housing for larger households needing four or more bedrooms 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Housing for middle class families 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Page 120 of 223 72CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Housing aordable to residents working in College Station public service/retail jobs 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Housing aordable to residents living on ﬁxed incomes like Social Security 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Permanent supportive housing for homeless persons 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Page 121 of 223 73CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Campus based or connected residence halls/apartments for students 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Executive/Luxury level housing 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Page 122 of 223 74CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 TOTAL Starter homes for first-time homebuyers 4.50% 22 1.43% 7 2.04% 10 2.25% 11 7.98% 39 4.29% 21 10.22% 50 7.77% 38 59.51% 291 489 Apartments for young adults working or starting families in College Station 6.34%31 1.84%9 3.07%15 3.48%17 10.43%51 8.18%40 12.27%60 11.66%57 42.74%209 489 Apartments, condos, and neighborhoods that appeal to millennials or young adults 9.00%44 5.93%29 4.70%23 6.95%34 12.27%60 7.57%37 12.88%63 9.00%44 31.70%155 489 Apartments, condos, and neighborhoods that appeal to seniors 2.86% 14 2.45% 12 5.52% 27 5.11% 25 12.27% 60 10.43% 51 15.34% 75 12.27% 60 33.74% 165 489 Housing that meets the needs of residents looking to downsize 5.32%26 3.07%15 5.93%29 6.34%31 19.02%93 11.86%58 11.86%58 10.02%49 26.58%130 489 Housing that meets the needs of residents losing mobility and needing housing with no stairs 4.09%20 2.66%13 3.27%16 6.54%32 11.04%54 8.59%42 13.70%67 10.63%52 39.47%193 489 Housing for larger households needing four or more bedrooms 10.22%50 4.50%22 5.93%29 9.00%44 15.13%74 11.25%55 11.45%56 9.20%45 23.31%114 489 Housing for middle class families 1.84% 9 0.82% 4 2.66% 13 2.86% 14 5.52% 27 6.34% 31 11.25% 55 11.45% 56 57.26% 280 489 Permanent supportive housing for homeless persons 15.13%74 10.63%52 5.93%29 5.93%29 11.45%56 7.98%39 9.41%46 5.52%27 28.02%137 489 Housing affordable to residents working in College Station public service/retail jobs 3.27%16 2.25%11 3.07%15 5.32%26 8.59%42 7.16%35 10.84%53 11.04%54 48.47%237 489 Housing affordable to residents living on fixed in comes like Social Security 3.27%16 2.25%11 2.25%11 6.34%31 8.38%41 7.98%39 14.11%69 9.82%48 45.60%223 489 Executive/Luxury level housing 40.90% 200 11.04% 54 6.54% 32 8.59% 42 11.86% 58 4.91% 24 7.57% 37 2.45% 12 6.13% 30 489 Campus based or connected residence halls/apartments for students 17.38%85 5.11%25 3.68%18 7.16%35 11.45%56 6.13%30 10.22%50 8.38%41 30.47%149 489 Page 123 of 223 75CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q16 - To make College Station more affordable, I would be willing to…Select all that apply. Pay $25/year more in taxes to support an aordable housing fund Pay $50/year more in taxes to support an aordable housing fund Pay $150/year more in taxes to support an aordable housing fund Pay $200/year more in taxes to support an aordable housing fund Rent out part of my house to a family member, local worker, or student Meet federal and/or state guidelines that allow my rentalproperty to be rented to a Housing Choice Voucher recipient Build an accessory unit on my property andrent to a family member or local worker Incentivize developers to create aordable housing Allow smaller lot sizes for single family homes Allow duplexes or townhomes in my neighborhood Allow a quad-plex rental building in my neighborhood Allow small lot (e.g., patio homes) in my neighborhood Accept more on-street parking in my neighborhood Have a high rise (8-12 stories) rental complex along major streets Have a medium rise (3-5 stories) rental complex along major streets Have a medium rise (3-5 stories) rental complex in my neighborhood Nothing Other 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answered: 489 Skipped: 223 Page 124 of 223 76CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Pay $25/year more in taxes to support an affordable housing fund 24.13%118 Pay $50/year more in taxes to support an affordable housing fund 20.04%98 Pay $150/year more in taxes to support an affordable housing fund 12.27%60 Pay $200/year more in taxes to support an affordable housing fund 16.16%79 Rent out part of my house to a family member, local worker, or student 11.86%58 Meet federal and/or state guidelines that allow my rental property to be rented to a Housing Choice Voucher recipient (rent assistance program from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development) 8.59%42 Build an accessory unit on my property and rent to a family member or local worker 12.68%62 Incentivize developers to create affordable housing 48.26%236 Allow smaller lot sizes for single family homes 38.85%190 Allow duplexes or townhomes in my neighborhood 32.72%160 Allow a quad-plex rental building in my neighborhood 15.34%75 Allow small lot (e.g., patio homes) in my neighborhood 36.81%180 Accept more on-street parking in my neighborhood 16.36%80 Have a high rise (8-12 stories) rental complex along major streets 28.22%138 Have a medium rise (3-5 stories) rental complex along major streets 41.92%205 Have a medium rise (3-5 stories) rental complex in my neighborhood 17.18%84 Nothing 13.91%68 Other (please specify)13.50%66 TOTAL 489 Page 125 of 223 77CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q17 - Which types of housing assistance should the City of College Station invest in over the next five years? Select all that apply. Programs to ensure middle and low wage workersin College Station can live in College Station Programs to mitigate the risk ofhomelessness for low income families Programs to help low and middle incomehouseholds transition to homeownership Discussing housing options for students, faculty and staof local higher education institutions with campusadministrators Down payment assistance programto assist with purchasing homes Programs to provideaordable rental options Assistance for makingproperties more energy ecient Use of city unused ownedland for aordable housing Tenant protections like rent increasenotices and longer eviction notice terms Programs for employers to provide housing assistanceto their low and moderate income employees Work with legislators to createmore tools for aordable housing Financial and homebuyer education to assistrenters to become homeowners Homeowner education programsto minimize existing expenses Programs to assist with renovations to make living spaces accessible Eorts to ensure that aordable inﬁll homes maintainthe character of existing neighborhoods None of the above Other 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answered: 489 Skipped: 223 Page 126 of 223 78CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Programs to ensure middle and low wage workers in College Station can live in College Station 64.83%317 Programs to mitigate the risk of homelessness for low income families 52.15%255 Programs to help low and middle income households transition to homeownership 59.51%291 Discussing housing options for students, faculty and staff of local higher education institutions with campus administrators 43.56%213 Down payment assistance program to assist with purchasing homes 46.63%228 Programs to provide affordable rental options 48.67%238 Assistance for making properties more energy efficient 40.70%199 Use of city unused owned land for affordable housing 48.88%239 Tenant protections like rent increase notices and longer eviction notice terms 0.00%0 Programs for employers to provide housing assistance to their low and moderate income employees 37.01%181 Work with legislators to create more tools for affordable housing 43.97%215 Financial and homebuyer education to assist renters to become homeowners 43.97%215 Homeowner education programs to minimize existing expenses (homestead exemptions, home repair, energy savings,etc…)43.56%213 Programs to assist with renovations to make living spaces accessible (for elderly or persons with disabilities)48.47%237 Efforts to ensure that affordable infill homes maintain the character of existing neighborhoods 48.06%235 None of the above 4.70%23 Other (please specify)11.25%55 TOTAL 489 Page 127 of 223 79CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q18 - Are there any housing strategies/ideas you have seen in other places that would help us creatively address housing needs in the City of College Station? Answered: 305 Skipped: 407 Q19 - What is your vision for the future of housing in College Station? Answered: 361 Skipped: 351 Page 128 of 223 80CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS AND RESPONSES General Survey Analysis and Responses to the Question “Are there any housing strategies/ideas you have seen in other place that would help us creatively address housing needs in the City of College Station?” 348 respondents gave an answer to the question “Are there any housing strategies/ideas you have seen in other place that would help us creatively address housing needs in the City of College Station?” (responses like “none” or “I don’t know” were removed and not included) Here are the major trends in the responses: • 119 respondents mentioned needing affordable housing. • 16 other respondents mentioned that housing is currently unaffordable. • 56 respondents mentioned the desire to separate students from non-students in housing, frequently expressing the desire to see students live on campus or closer to campus. Increased density for student housing was mentioned often. • 52 respondents expressed the desire to see more housing density or a more diverse range of housing options. • 32 respondents expressed wanting more homeownership opportunities. • 27 respondents mentioned Texas A&M University and the University do more in the housing space • 26 respondents mentioned the desire to have transportation related issues, siting the desire to live closer to work, in more walkable neighborhoods, etc… • 21 respondents envisioned enhanced or protected neighborhood integrity and/or expressed a desire to maintain existing neighborhoods. • 21 respondents envisioned more affordable housing for college students. • Respondents expressed the desire for more housing options for the following groups of people: • 34 stated more housing options were needed for working families. • 27 stated more housing options were needed for low-income families. • 26 stated more housing options were needed for middle class families. • 14 stated more housing options were needed for young families or young professionals. • 10 stated more housing options were needed for seniors and/or persons with disabilities. • 18 respondents wanted to see less dense housing development moving forward. • 16 respondents mentioned wanting diverse or inclusive housing. • 12 respondents wanted to see lower property taxes. Page 129 of 223 81CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 1. Newly designed architecture. Everything need not be boring it's 2024. Let's make something beautiful and functional. Wide open roadways, no traffic, no smart streets (they didn't work in San Antonio 10 years ago ND they don't work here lol. I want to see communities coming together not standing apart. We need to do everything in our power to unifiy these twin cities and fast. 2. That I'm not in it. 3. A voter backlash on the idea of not increasing density. Density must increase in single family neighborhoods as the town grows. 4. Denser housing products closer to the university, asking the university to aid in infrastructure reconstruction in the older parts of town nearer the school. 5. Affordable, modest size homes for middle class families. 6. Appropriate housing options for all groups. Tax break options for builders and businesses in College Station. Over regulation is creating higher tax issues affecting current homeowners. Active living upgrades (walking trails, parks, event center programs, skating rink, etc...) 7. Affordable housing for lower income families. 8. Maintain the existing family neighborhoods and keep the current occupancy regulations. 9. Affordable, duplex and apartments. 10. Densification near campus, outside suburban areas with middle housing and mixed-uses (groceries). 11. I know it's hard to meet the needs of all the various populations, but I do think College Station is making a conscious effort to do so. 12. Less restrictions in housing areas close to campus, this has become incredibly complex! 13. Affordable housing for citizens not making 6 figure salaries. 14. A future where families can reside in safety im proximity to schools and services. 15. More affordable housing. 16. That safe and affordable options are provided to working families without 3-4x the income- it’s a discriminatory practice. 17. Designing areas so that Heat Islands are not created, using environmentally friendly lighting to prevent skyglow, using energy efficient materials and require bird-friendly glass and designs to help migrating birds. 18. More affordable options and ensuring neighborhoods are up-kept. 19. Less college student centric housing options, more availability for young professionals and young families to enter the housing market. New homes that are affordable are not walkable. 20. That housing and living in College Station will become more affordable for ALL. That student housing will be addressed by TAMU to create more affordable on-campus living spaces. That neighborhood integrity will be upheld to maintain the "home" feeling of College Station. That taxes will be reduced OR that city funds will be more wisely spent to lower/stop increasing the tax burden on owners. That more housing options will become available for middle and lower income families. Let's keep the city family friendly and family focused, while also trying to accomodate our students with appropriate housing that doesn't flow over as much into established residential areas. Page 130 of 223 82CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 21. A wider mix of housing options for the young professionals who work in College Station. Whether it's Class A apartments that do not allow students, or more affordable first time homebuyer homes that are protected against investors. 22. There becomes more availability for those who are not super rich to still live somewhere decent. 23. To be affordable. 24. My ultimate vision for College Station is to have Southgate and Eastgate develop similar to Northgate. If that were allowed to happen, it would concentrate the student population around campus, allowing better commutes to TAMU and freeing up some of the congestion on the rest of the roadway network. This would also result in properties that are student rentals currently to be available for first time home buyers in areas near College Hills, South Knoll, and Southwood Valley elementary schools. 25. Have A&M take responsibility for housing their students. 26. Abundant, affordable, student housing options. On campus housing with kitchens. 27. Affordable. 28. Keep restaurants and housing separate. 29. More families live in the residential neighborhoods and communities. College Students live closer to campus. Every neighborhood has parks, sidewalks and bike lanes. 30. No particular vision for the community but my 5 year plan currently is to move out of College Station. Rising property taxes, a long with everything else, makes living here unaffordable. 31. More walkable neighborhoods and useful public transportation. 32. Improve housing to those who are house less, low to middle income as well as disabled individuals. 33. Well built generally, and with increased density combined with amenities like corner shops with a walkable community. Consider a role for public transportation. 34. Parks and Recreation could expand pickle ball and lap swim for the ever growing elderly population. 35. Honestly, anything ACTUALLY affordable that doesn't feel like it'll be turning into a slum in the next 15 years. It's harder and harder to afford to live in this city anymore. 36. Affordable housing options for low-income renters and homebuyers. 37. Gearing more towards the families that live here year round rather than the students that are here temporarily 38. More family homes vs the amount of student housing we currently have. 39. Somehow balance needs of students and full-time residents 40. We need to have a zoning for student housing specifically, wherein you can use portions of existing neighborhoods for denser types of development but still maintain areas where you can incentivize first time buyers and lower income resident families to live outside of those areas. Page 131 of 223 83CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 41. A place where those who live and work here are prioritized over glitzy living luxury apartments and large spacious houses that are too expensive for average workers and instead favor students who will only be renting temporarily. Affordable places for a family of one are almost always poorly cared for, in suspicious neighborhoods, or are so expensive they fall outside the range of what most jobs pay in this area. 42. Low to middle income service workers will be forced to live in poorly maintained homes or won't be able to afford to live in town. Housing - even for college students - is far too expensive. The average worker - even TAMU faculty - cannot afford housing. 43. Plant more trees, make it look better and have structures that look good after 10 years or more, and faddish. 44. Affordable housing for everyone. 45. Unfortunately I see what is semi-affordable housing being replaced with four and five bedroom rentals with little off-street parking. Try driving down streets in Carter's Grove! 46. More affordable/closer housing for TAMU faculty and staff. It was very hard moving to this area from out of state and finding housing that was affordable and close to the university. I would also love to see all TAMU students have access to affordable, safe housing close to the university. 47. Nice and affordable house both homes and apartments. 48. Less housing options that are being only geared towards students (Ag Shacks). There are apartment buildings and tons of housing options going up all over town for students but very few affordable options for young families in neighborhoods. The houses that young families could afford were bought, torn down, and developed for student housing. 49. Affordable for working families without taking over half of the paycheck. 50. None, I'm mostly concerned with my own family and neighborhood and having affordable options for middle class (say, family income $60-120k) families. 51. Work with TAMU to ensure that the city can handle the infrastructure needs of an ever-inflating (and transitory) student population. 52. Safe, clean, friendly neighborhoods that support the students, staff and faculty of the university. This will include a combination of single and multi unit structures. 53. To be a more inclusive community. 54. What the heck does this matter, the city will do what it wants. 55. More 3 or 4 bedroom homes in the 200-250,000 range. 56. A variety of housing options in walkable neighborhoods with close access to parks / green space, functional public transit, and restaurants / grocery. 57. We're going to need more affordable housing. 58. The way things are going, I see faculty and staff being pushed farther and farther from campus while new student housing developments are being built. Additionally, the housing market is terrible right now for buyers so many staff are renting too and don't want to be renting student housing apartments, but duplexes or triplexes for non-students. Page 132 of 223 84CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 59. Options for all levels. 60. All are welcome, all can afford to be here, College Station is MUCH more than just the home of TAMU. 61. More affordable options for both residents and students, however a greater focus on developing for residents who are paying taxes here year round. 62. My vision is the outcome caused by the plans I selected in q16. Being aggressive by building apartment units on major streets is unappealing to me. The city of college Station is a beautiful place to reside and getting to aggresive with housing efforts will result in unintended consequences as seen in other cities who have done so. 63. Uncertain. 64. Having an actual middle class, and homes that can be owned by families instead of corporations. 65. Available. Affordable. 66. We are running out of land. 67. Mixed use walkable dense infrastructure. 68. Family home neighborhoods not be infiltrated with students and minimal on street parking. 69. More affordable housing, less property taxes. 70. Neighborhoods maintained for families, areas of higher density housing, lots of apartments for students, affordable on-campus housing. 71. No more apartments. 72. Affordable homes instead of greedy. 73. Make it more affordable for all demographics similar to North Houston. 74. Strategy that encompasses all people of all ages, races, economical and social status. 75. Affordable housing for all ages. Especially those who make 50g a year or less. 76. To fill homes that are being built on south side and build more apartments for students close to campus. 77. Housing options available for individuals in every walk of life. Small, affordable housing units should be available in some areas, but not to the detriment of existing home prices in the immediate area. Mixing and matching single-family homes, apartments, and potentially micro-apartments within a very close area is likely to frustrate everyone involved. I also hope that affordable housing doesn't become the priority to the exclusion of options for others to build larger houses with a larger yards within the bounds of CS school districts for expanding families. 78. There needs to be a way to stop the 5/5 and up type housing for students in residential neighborhoods. It chases out other homeowners and drives up the cost of real estate making it very difficult to buy into housing when you are competing with rental units. 79. A place for all people regardless of income. 80. People work to afford what's important to them... Page 133 of 223 85CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 81. A mixture of single-person rentals suitable for the large student population, small homes for individuals, and medium homes for families. 82. Equity. Maintain our green spaces in neighborhoods to draw people in. Rental property code enforcement that cares. 83. More affordable apartments, and “starter” homes, accessibility requirement requirements for all new housing units (bathrooms included), roommate friendly apartment and townhouses, as well as communities for disabled individuals and their families. 84. I would like to see students and lower income renters or homeowners comfortably and safely thriving in their neighborhoods and within the communities. Too many people are sacrificing groceries, foregoing meals and/or picking and choosing which bills are more important because the housing cost is too expensive and inflation is already unaffordable for most. This is a student driven town, there's no reason extra and unnecessary financial burdens should be levied upon young adults trying to attain a higher education. 85. Lower rent cost for affordable and stable home environments for all. 86. I wish there was just really good middle class starter housing. And, not built by cheap builders like DR Horton or in undesirable areas like the old race track. Anyone who has lived here knows that soil is questionable. 87. Affordable and accessible options for employees of the university who aren't paid well enough to afford housing. 88. AFFORDABLE. 89. Affordable and plentiful for people of all income levels without being forced into having roommates due to cost. 90. I honestly doubt anything will change tbh. 91. It needs to be more diverse and not cater to college students or people in high income earning brackets. 92. More Shared wall housing with an emphasis on acustic dampning on common walls, and a focous on home ownership rather than rentals. 93. Working class families can afford 3-4 bedroom homes. Without everything being catered to college students 94. To have more houses with larger yards under $300k. 95. Residents of CS would be able to work, send their kids to schools and live in CS if they s desired. 96. Don't want to spend 40% of my income on rent. 97. That it will be more affordable to live in a space that properly accommodates families, without sacrificing good schools. 98. Where low income students and non students can find housing and not have to choose between rent and food where they can choose to live alone. Less luxury housing and apartments and more units that aren’t in disrepair because they were built in the 60s. Page 134 of 223 86CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 99. Not looking good my friends. I've lived in BCS for almost 20 years now. From 13 to 31. I've only ever seen this shit get worse, and I know y'all ain't incompetent or brain dead. Good luck, and may whatever deity you believe in have mercy on us all. Start getting ready for them homeless, and I really hope it isn't by criminalizing and dehumanizing them. Won't go well for this city if it does. 100. More affordable homes for middle class. 101. Rent to own. 102. To get the realtors out of the halls of government. To get Texas A&M to build on their land. If you are going to increase student numbers you must provide more housing period. 103. No property taxes. No zoning. Builders flock to this area and the supply increases and prices drop. 104. There needs to be more affordable options for homebuyers, we have plenty of apartments and student housing. I would like to see a return to 2 bed 1 bath smaller homes. 105. It's just going to get more expensive. Brazos county is one of the top most expensive taxed areas in the state. 106. More affordable and equitable housing options. 107. To break the $500 for a room and access to a bathroom mentality that keeps all prices inflated. Bring back studio apartments designed for one, maybe two, people which have fewer amenities and cost less. 108. More housing with adjoining walls to save energy on home energy expenses. 109. More homes (houses and duplexes) affordable for families (rental and to buy); less high rises and AgShacks. 110. Property taxes for houses which more accurately reflect property value: fewer exceptions to exclude some from paying; better alignment of market values and CAD appraisal values. 111. Less Students. 112. We don't have enough housing and the cost of living has gone up exponentially in the five years. If we want to both attract people and keep them, we need a variety of types of housing, more duplexes and townhomes, and they need to be at affordable prices. I'm a hiring manager at the university and I'm genuinely concerned that housing prices will deter candidates from moving here and have already seen it in action. I figure I've got 3-4 years before I'm basically priced out of the rental market here and just need to find a different job because living here has gotten unreasonable. I was College Station to be a place where people can both work AND live, because right now it's trending in a way that it will not be in the near future. 113. More single family homes that reflect the salary ranges of residents, not parents of college students. 114. Less luxury, prohibitive cost residential construction of houses and apartments. 115. I would like to see more affordable single bedroom and studio apartment complexes for students and young adults. Less single family homes and more duplexes and townhomes to cater to young working adults. 116. Affordability for middle class families who continue to struggle with inflation, cost of living and increased taxes. Local and State government need to intervene but unfortunately, money talks and pockets are filled to keep the status quo. Page 135 of 223 87CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 117. I would like to see a variety of housing options for smaller families/households such as retires, empty nesters, and young families/professionals that don’t require large houses and that otherwise would live in apartments, condos, or townhomes. 118. It's bleak as long as the current mortgage payment for the average house in College Station will continue to cost more than my entire net income. 119. A debt free city with affordability for all income classes. 120. More affordable living so that the roots of this town being the locals can continue to enjoy this area. 121. Safe neighborhoods and apartment complexes with a focus on quality of life like parks, trails, safe biking, traffic easing measures, and preserving what makes living here a peaceful place. 122. No more new apartment complexes and lower taxes. 123. To have affordable housing and not need 14 roommates to be able to afford it!! 124. You pay for proximity. Places like Hearne, Snook, and Iola are very affordable. 125. As a person over 55 I don't see much of a future in College Station the housing caters to students. 126. More affordable housing for single adults. 127. Need to control cost of renting. Cost to rent has gone way up with inflation, but wages have not keep up at all. 128. Affordability. 129. More mixed neighborhoods. Less sprawl. Housing for all income levels. 130. Smaller two bedroom duplexes really fit a need for many here. 131. More walk and bikeable areas. Higher density housing. 132. Maintain character of existing neighborhoods; do not build student housing (AgShacks) in existing neighborhoods. 133. There needs to be more regulation and accountability of developers and housing companies who continue to build more private student housing, but fail to maintain it so it becomes undesirable to students and the cycle of building the newer/better student housing continues. Our roads cannot handle enormous student complexes going in. 134. In general, more affordable housing for middle class. Most middle class adults live outside of the city, while students and upper class adults can afford to live in the city. 135. I don't have an answer yet, but as A&M continues to grow...it's going to get worse. The university has to be a part of the solution. 136. There should be caps on rent, no discrimination against low income renters, more affordable housing that is also dignified to live in. 137. I see dense neighborhoods with mixed retail and living in the north and west areas of the city. I would love to integrate parks and green spaces to alleviate traffic and encourage less car dependent cultures. There should be small homes on small lots for first time home buyers. Apartments should be plentiful and cheap and well kept. Page 136 of 223 88CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 138. I think the infrastructure needs to be addressed before any new housing is developed. More small shops/cafes should also be dispersed in neighborhoods so we don't have so many boring square miles of nothing but single family homes. 139. Greater access to housing for all residents. 140. Affordable housing and good public transportation. 141. Density scaling with distance from Campus, NO single family exclusive zoning withing a half mile of campus. 142. Make housing more affordable for first-time buyers; make transitional housing accessible. 143. More affordable housing for grad students and other lower-income people without sacrificing safety or living in a heavily undergrad-based area. 144. Affordable housing regardless of demand. If companies can somehow be made to care less about their profits, the people in the city would have more money to spend on things besides housing, which would surely help the local economy. 145. Lower taxes. 146. Affordable homes in affordable neighborhoods. 147. As more seniors choose to retire in this area, I would like the city to place higher emphasis on senior living areas that are not multilevel, but consist of standalone homes for independent living. 148. That the City become more concerned with people who actually live here, not the students! 149. The future would involve stereotypical family neighborhoods with individual houses, other neighborhoods with multi-family housing, tiny homes on small lots, etc, with access to public transportation. These areas would have covered bus stops to protect from rain and sun. Really, the transportation issues should go along with the neighborhood planning issues. Younger people don't like driving, and seniors are less able to drive. But we have to factor in the summer heat and how to protect people who need public transportation. 150. Around 10,000 of our 31,000 family householders (>25yrs age) have incomes less than $45K/yr and cannot afford to compete with the typical rental cash flow from only 2 students ($1000/mo.). The cost of "tools" that essentially subsidize this group to compensate is unrealistic. Any strategy to provide this demographic affordable housing must isolate them from competition with students. The university's de facto housing strategy right now is to simply to continue to take our single family. New construction in Northgate with $1000/bdr/mo rentals provides no relief at all. Students will not pay that when they can simply take another house at $500/bdrm. Again, our lowest 10,000 residents cannot afford $500/bdrm. 151. Keep housing affordable for people that work here. 152. The city getting out of the way and letting the market take care of it. 153. No ag-shacks in established single family neighborhoods. 154. Vision of what's likely? More & larger freaking apartments. 155. A community that is welcoming to all. Page 137 of 223 89CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 156. Expand borders. 157. It shouldn't become another Houston, Dallas or Austin with all the high rises and no parking and parking garages everywhere. It should maintain a more country rural feeling with biking trails, green spaces, trees. Everywhere there is building the first thing they do is take down all the trees and add concrete. The current large housing complexes standard of construction is cheap and I would hate to see what they will look like in 10 years. 158. Keep single family homes and neighborhoods just that “single family” Work with the university and have them create more housing for students. 159. Market driven! 160. Control growth. 161. Maintain the family neighborhoods and keep college students out of these areas. 162. That the families living in a trailer park nearby will be able to find affordable housing at an acceptable place for an affordable price. 163. Housing for young families. Our schools are at risk of depopulating. 164. Affordable homes for families, get the housing prices under control so the taxes don't push us out to Navasota. 165. To have affordable housing to meet all citizens NEEDS, as opposed to their exorbitant desires. 166. Less students in my neighborhood. 167. Custom neighborhood. 168. Honestly I'm worried I'm going to have to move to Navasota to be able to afford to buy a house in the next few years. 169. Affordable housing for families. 170. An infrastructure that meets demand. 171. So focusing every building, every home, and every business around the students. There are families here as well and we are simply forgotten and ignored. 172. Everyone who wants someplace to live can do so easily. 173. Affordable housing for all! 174. Affordable. 175. To pay affordable rent in a decent neighborhood. 176. I would like to see neighborhoods that don’t bulldoze every tree in sight to cram as many houses as possible in a neighborhood. A family should be able to move into a home with mature trees in the front and back of the home. 177. Keep nice neighborhoods intact. 178. For it to be better and more affordable. Page 138 of 223 90CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 179. Stop catering everything in this town to the university. Those of us that live and work here year round deserve better. I would like to see more housing options for families. The majority of rentals here are per bedroom so clearly aimed at students. 180. More focus on the people who are not students. Rent is really high and most jobs here do not pay a livable wage. I would love to see more efforts to support low income families. 181. Something affordable for everyone!! 182. Neighborhoods that are walkable, bikible, affordable, accessible for disabled/elderly, close enough to amenities (e.g., public transport, groceries). Not all has to be present in every neighborhood but there should at least be two/three of these in every neighborhood with a good mix of various combinations. 183. This is a growing community and likely will reflect larger urban areas with suburban type feel neighborhoods and more dense properties closer to the university and retail/commercial areas. 184. Students on campus. 185. More affordable housing for families less catering to college students. 186. Stop students and investors from taking over single family homes. Keep them in apartments or on campus housing. 187. I want to be able to afford to own a home in my own hometown!!! 188. Neighborhoods that are “luxury living” be left alone as luxury and utilize other city land that isn’t currently being developed to cater to students and more “attainable” housing. 189. A good mix of neighborhood types, with different affordability levels, and assistance on a case- by-case basis. This should not detract from the character of existing neighborhoods, nor hinder development and improvement of areas. 190. No idea. 191. Inclusivity of all demographics in ideal. 192. Affordable housing for lower income families. 193. Everything is going to continue raising in prices. It is going to be more difficult for workers to buy homes in the area. TAMU is increasing its enrollment each year, but I don't know that the infrastructure can support the increases. 194. Invest in housing that will draw more people into College Station (Del Webb-type; combined shopping/education/housing sub-division. 195. More options, lower prices. 196. Absolutely zero corporate owned single family homes, and for Brazos County to reduce the land size necessary for Ag exemption. I also believe we need to adjust rent prices and potential fix them to lower rates and prevent owners from skyrocketing rent. We need to stop taxing people out of their homes, there is absolutely no reason to raise the value of a home that has had zero modifications done to it. 197. Affordable, and able to bring a diverse group of people. Page 139 of 223 91CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 198. Do not follow Austin's relaxing of minimum lot sizes, etc. 199. To be affordable. 200. To be more affordable. 201. 3-4 bedroom homes that are affordable ($260,000 - $330,000). 202. Family neighborhoods with sidewalks and schools nearby. Keep college student housing near campus. 203. A balance of off campus housing for students and single family housing for residents that's affordable. Not all students are rich and can survive rent charges as they are now and many jobs for every day workers also can't afford rent around this area. Find the happy medium so more people are enticed to live in the city that are permanent residents. 204. Affordable housing WITHOUT students living in the neighborhoods. 205. Gee, good question. I would love to see the old neighborhoods preserved meaning restrictions put in place to protect them. Areas for affordable housing and affordable housing. Investors who live outside of BCS don't give a hoot about our neighborhoods or the people who live in them. 206. If the costs of living and the high utilities bills don't come down, my family of 6 will not be able to afford living here and providing a higher education for our children and our income is a little over 100,000. Thought that was great, but barely hanging on and we are frugal with our income. 207. Affordable home-ownership opportunities for all middle-class families. 208. Build less apartments 209. The University will step up with student housing innovation ideas and funding. 210. More areas where basic things that a family needs can be accessed without a car. 211. Natural. 212. A community where there are no vacant houses/bedrooms. There could be plenty of people in Pebble Creek or South Side who would actually want the extra income of renting a bedroom to a student. 213. The city not ruining what has made College Station what it is. 214. A variety of neighborhoods with some offering single family housing and some offering student housing. To maintain property values I would prefer that student housing is not mixed into single family home neighborhoods. 215. To install more drain pipes along the main road to decrease flooding. 216. Continue with neighborhood developments that have homes in the same pricing and square footage. Decreasing the size and pricing to sell property decreases the appeal to existing residents. Visions of developments are what appeal to new residents and changing those ideals /plans does not provide trust in residents of developers and the city of college station. 217. More affordable housing for middle income people. Page 140 of 223 92CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 218. Hopefully, small 800 sqft - 1,100 sqft but high quality patio home neighborhoods for downsizing, first homes, seniors, etc. And a mixture of mid-rise apartment buildings, townhomes, condos with walkable neighborhood amenities in other areas, and normal single-family home neighborhoods for traditional family living, and a bunch of higher-density student housing options near Texas A&M campus. 219. Higher density at the core. The new city building is an abomination sending the signal that we want to sprawl and we are willing to waste previous investments. 220. Efficient housing provided to all stakeholders of Texas A&M. 221. A fair housing Mecca where everyone who works can make it. 222. More housing types allowed. Working with the community to be more accepting of new housing options. 223. A safe, walkable, affordable city. Preferably with more starter homes too. 224. Municipal Utility Districts via Economic Development Agreements with the City. 225. Affordable single-family homes for low or middle income families. 226. More houses that are affordable for middle class families. 227. Not allowing AgShacks in single-family residential areas. 228. Affordable housing options for individuals who are just starting out their careers and want to be homeowners in safe residential areas/not student housing. 229. More affordable home prices and no property taxes. 230. Less parking requirements (closer to public transit and in bikeable, walkable friendly areas) will help with affordable housing. 231. Capacity increases in high-density areas, with an emphasis on quality of life. 232. Lower wage workers can afford to live in the community they serve. 233. Everyone being able to comfortably rent or own a home. 234. More affordable housing. 235. More 2 or 3 bedroom homes for people who aren't students in nice areas that are affordable. 236. To have more options on the outskirts of the city for housing on 1-5 acre lots. 237. More affordable rent options for upperclassmen, easier to own starter homes. 238. Would like to see it be more affordable for middle income families. 239. Keep existing neighborhoods in good condition and limit college students in family neighborhoods. 240. Diverse. 241. I wish houses were more affordable but also offered variety and character. Current housing being built looks cheap and cost too much. Page 141 of 223 93CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 242. I do not support tax money funding efforts to make the COCS a less desirable place to live. Affordable Housing means high density which means a strain on infrastructure: traffic, parking, electricity, water, etc. 243. Affordable housing for all: Students, Low, middle, high incomes. 244. My personal vision is to move out of the city limits. I am COCS employee and enjoy this city but cannot afford my rent & utilities. Without more affordable options or these new programs I have no other option. 245. Options for luxury affordable renting and buying options. 246. More affordable homes. Even Bryan has been building more affordable homes under 200k with smaller footprint for small families. All we have are 200/500k homes popping up in the area & I am flabbergasted at who can actually afford these homes and what jobs they have; because the jobs are no paying like that here. Especially faculty jobs in secondary schools. 247. I think there are too many instances in which new student housing is rolled out and old, dilapidated apartments are rented out using Section 8 vouchers. 248. More dense walkable neighborhoods in appropriate areas. Not just student housing, especially east of Hwy 6. 249. Mixed use and mixed income apartments, condos, and other forms of multifamily housing! 250. Students are primarily housed on or near campus. Housing prices would come down allowing more individuals to afford a mortgage. I am a clinical professor at TAMU and I can not afford to own a home because I am a single parent. Beyond housing, there is a large problem with transportation which is directly impacted by housing. Regardless of which government entity owns the roadways in which neighborhoods/complexes are built - if the road isn't suitable for the number of humans that will require its use because the housing has been built, that is a problem. This has been a problem for many years in the area. As a parent, I have found this issue to be more concerning as I consider the safety of the roads that kids walk along when going to and from school. 251. That more housing would be targeted for seniors and families. Mutli-student households, rent by the room and student targeted housing drive up the costs for families and non-student singles. There are many student complexes but too many students rent in family neighborhoods, drivibg up those rental costs and causing parking and noise issues. It is becoming harder for families and seniors to live here with so many things, housing included, targeted to students. While TAMU is important, the city needs to be attractive to all ages, not just students. Other citizens often feel marginalized economically, socially, etc. since almost everything seems to be target towards TAMU. 252. Every family/citizen has a place to call home. 253. Slow down the student population from taking over family neighborhoods. Reduce the cheaply built homes with tiny lots that continue to pop up everywhere (Ag Shacks, Southern Pointe type neighborhoods, etc.). 254. Fair and affordable housing for all - alongside the options discussed in this survey, i believe the fair housing ordinance should be amended to include sexuality and gender identity as protected classes. 255. Whatever meets the needs of the people living here. Page 142 of 223 94CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 256. The city should get out of the way!! 257. Remove ROO, as 80% of residents voted against it, but was passed by city council do to their own and donor interests. More townhomes with consolidated parking. Allow for short term rentals despite the surplus of hotel rooms. Let the free market dictate the future. 258. Affordable housing maintained for all of the fast food, workers and low income university workers somewhere near the University. 259. A more walk-able city center with high-rise multi-family housing. 260. Housing is a need, not a commodity. Burst the price bubble. 261. With property taxes and higher utility bills, College Station is becoming less affordable every year. I believe many residents will move to better affordable areas outside City limits. 262. I am personally struggling to become a homeowner for the first time and I make well above the average salary in CS. I can only imagine people making less having little hope of owning a home. I'd like to see CS have students moving into the high rises and student complexes so that the "investors" from other cities who own a lot of the single family homes and multiplex houses will lower rents or sell to people who want to live locally here. We are losing a lot of money as a community with profits from rentals going to other cities instead of staying local. I personally want a house in town since I work in town and want a shorter commute. I would want people who work in College Station to be able to live in CS if they so choose. Many people who work in public service or retail can't afford to work here. We need to serve our citizens who make this city run much better. 263. It's only going to get worse. I don't have hope. 264. Affordable housing with small, fenced yards that welcomes pets. 265. More affordable options. 266. More ways for people to become homeowners when they can't come up with the cash needed. 267. Hopefully more affordable housing to own. 268. Too many houses on too small lots. 269. Increased pricing due to supply/demaind within a certain proximity of campus. 270. Balanced (demographically, racially) affordable housing sufficient to the need. 271. Build homes for low to middle class residents that are will to do there part in our Community and make a difference. 272. Scratch the new middle housing zoning. A serious mistake killing neighborhoods. 273. Preserve existing and expand family-oriented neighborhoods. ELIMINATE on-street parking for rental properties. Preserve historic neighborhoods. 274. When increasing housing, make sure the infrastructure can withstand the increase in population density. 275. Grim. 276. Choice in home size, lot size. We may not be able to meet all need within our city. Page 143 of 223 95CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 277. Truly affordable quality housing. 278. It is affordable. 279. High density on all sides of TAMU to provide more housing closer to campus and create less traffic. 280. Sadly, it's dystopian - undergrads will infiltrate Pebble Creek and Castlegate, and there will be high- rises everywhere. 281. Maintain the integrity of neighborhoods, make A&M responsible for some of the problems they are creating, make the building permit process easier for smaller/starter homes. 282. Bryan-College Station in 2024, with a population of ~200,000lbs is approximately the same size as Austin, TX was in ~1970. Our town will continue to grow as long as the state continues increasing enrollment at Texas A&M, which they've committed to do and we cannot stop. Please stop kidding ourselves by acknowledging that we are on that path, but we're going to provide the needed housing without increasing density. I know that a noisy bunch of voters think increasing density is taboo and ruining "neighborhood integrity," but please limit the amount of time that those exclusionists keep us on the current path of pretending that we can service a growing housing need without increasing density in single family neighborhoods. Try as we might: even lower income residents and students will pay a premium NOT to live in apartment complexes. That means the current growth pattern of College Station is increased suburbanization (more and more people commuting into the city center from afar), which generates infrastructure, traffic & transit challenges. Look for ways to increase density and decrease regulation, fees & taxes; that will increase housing affordability for all classes of our population and avoid the coming traffic crises that we're running into, as long as our voter base is adamantly opposed to increased density in single family neighborhoods. 283. Expand high occupancy overlay to include more housing especially closer to campus. 284. Housing attainability for first time home buyers, low to middle class citizens. 285. Inclusive housing. 286. Abolish No More Than Four. 287. Diversity. 288. Well, we have a housing crisis and rent keeps going up. Families can't afford to live here anymore, which means it's harder to make the move into homeownership. 60-70% of single-family homes in B/CS are rental units. It would be nice to have some stability of single-family homes for families, not "starter homes" that cost $450k+ with 7% interest rates. Homeowners also don't want to invest in a poorly-crafted home that we are currently seeing being built in our area. If a house can be built in 2 months, it's not going to last. I'd be worried about the integrity and longevity of the neighborhood. 289. I would like to see renovation of existing apartment complexes to encourage full occupancy instead of constant new construction of infill housing that eliminates homes suitable for families. 290. Higher density apartments within a mile of campus, duplexes/townhomes within 3 miles, and keep the low density detached homes >3 miles away. Geometry does not support low density homes for everyone near campus. 291. All types of housing options should be available with a reasonable cost. 292. One where people working and studying here can actually afford it without thousands of dollars in debt to loans to pay for their housing, whether it's in dorms or an apartment or a house. Page 144 of 223 96CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 293. Home owners and college students mixed neighborhoods. 294. I know that the future of College Station is big. High rises are already being built all over town. I hope that I can preserve my area as single family and welcome the growth all around me. :) 295. Put the affordable housing as close as possible to Navasota. 296. Have three goals: 1-save existing single family neighborhoods (allow either four or two if ROO). Work with University to create affordable housing for students (University of Texas gave money to this). 3-Upgrade dilapidated apartments for students 4-Keep duplexes/townhomes for working class but require rental inspection to make sure landlords aren’t taking advantage of people 6-Build high rises along Harvey 7-Create bike paths that connect all parks close to University (Brison to Tarrow), (John Crompton to Wolf Pen along Wellborn), (all along Anderson to Bee Creek), (Brison to Gabbard)-this would allow for students and working class to bike; provide incentives to businesses to upgrade facades and provide incentives to apartment buildings to upgrade making their properties suitable for students and working class families, plant trees everywhere, build mixed use in West Park, keep your historic neighborhoods. 297. TÃbet home developments group homes for elderly starter homes for new middle income homeowners. 298. A mix of housing types where walkable connections exist and encourage socioeconomic mixing in public "third places". 299. I wish I could afford to live here. 300. The city will have to have more decent areas with income restrictions to keep housing affordable. 301. I am working in neighboring communities. As long as elected officials and employees have the attitude that they know best without asking for input from real professionals, the problem will only get worse. CSISD will decline and the city will be forced to raise taxes to just keep it's head above water. 302. I would love to see more options for elderly people that do not look like nursing homes. 303. Walkable. Mass transit. Green. 304. Let the free market work! Work with developers to build more houses! 305. There would be low income housing options in every neighborhood, not just in isolated areas. It is better for the community as a whole if we are all living among one another, and not pushing others to corners. 306. A mixture of all types of housing options. More dorms for A&M students. 307. More requirements and laws to keep property owners who rent their facilities responsible for the upkeep of them and to not gouge renters. Should be a maximum percentage they can increase rent. 308. More single family starter homes that are well-built. 309. Clean and neat. 310. More family oriented neighborhoods with less student renters. Page 145 of 223 97CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 311. A place where those who work and live here permanently have affordable choices and don't have to compete with investors (both in and out-of-town) who are just making money from renting to students. 312. Neighborhoods where people walk and know each other. 313. College students not living in the middle of single family neighborhoods. 314. No more high rise apartments. 315. More affordable family homes in nice neighborhoods. 316. Housing options for new professionals, low income earners. 317. Affordable. 318. Don't dump student apartments, housing in existing residential areas. 319. Quality!!! Not Aggie Shacks! 320. Less rent by room apartments and more family friendly places. 321. Spread it out. 322. Enforce current zoning laws. No more ag shacks. No more high rise apartments. 323. New neighborhoods of attractive inexpensive housing that has guaranteed maintenance. 324. Don't know. 325. I am afraid the city will become a slum with low end housing and no place for professionals to live. TAMU will not be able to attract talent to work at the university if there is no housing for them and their families. THe city is destroying nice neighborhoods with rezoning. 326. You need to work with the university, which keeps expanding enrollment, to get housing options for students near the university. The city also needs to learn to prioritize the needs of permanent residents over the needs of students who are only here for 4-6 years. Some neighborhoods are being destroyed with rental homes with multiple students. The permanent residents should come first. And stop raising property taxes. 327. A&M build More affordable dorms/apt for the students so that students are not taking all the affordable housing in the city. 328. Nothing good. The developers own the city/county government. 329. I would like my children to be able to afford housing here without being house poor. Wages have not kept up with housing prices or property tax increases. 330. I think the City is on the right track - encourage TAMU to build more on campus facilities and require Freshman to live on campus. 331. The traffic problems in Collee Station are affecting the housing situation. 332. Make the university invest in more student housing, either on- or off-campus. 333. Students living in dorms and apartments instead of taking up all of the affordable housing space. Page 146 of 223 98CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 334. Slow housing growth. Make things city wide more energy efficient. 335. Hopefully not all cheap student housing. 336. Neighborhood integrity, with A&M taking the lead on providing affordable on-campus housing, and contributing to city infrastructure to help provide housing options for their junior staff. 337. I is to expensive for me to live in this City with HOA's & Taxes. 338. Neighborhoods with greater variety in options so people who are different are living as one community, rather than separate. 339. A city that enforces zoning codes for different economic levels. 340. Create separate neighborhoods for students, and provide new neighborhoods for senior living. 341. Student and family lifestyles don't mix. We need neighborhoods for one or the other, not both. 342. Lots with mature trees, native bushes and plants, creative planning. 343. Maintain quality housing standards by builders in both low and high price point homes. 344. Locate students close(r) to A&M in higher-density buildings/complexes, demolish low-income apartment complexes (such as along Harvey Road) and replace with "downtown" type development similar to Century Square, add new construction in the $300-$500 range that has 1 acre lots (instead of squeezing as many houses into new developments as possible). 345. More affordable. The city in general, is thriving off of students who relocate every year and limit options for residents who want to stay long term. 346. An affordable place for all people. 347. STUDENTS STUDENTS. 348. My hope is that it would not look cluttered but that we would be flexible in helping all age groups not just students. Page 147 of 223 99CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS AND RESPONSES General Survey Analysis and Responses to the Question “What is your vision for the future of housing in College Station?” 193 respondents gave an answer to the question “What is your vision for the future of housing in College Station?” (responses like “none” or “I don’t know” were removed and not included) Here are the major trends in the responses: • 34 respondents suggested increasing housing density or creating more mixed use housing. • 18 respondents suggested that Texas A&M University become more involved providing housing for students and employees. • 15 respondents expressed how expensive housing currently is. • 13 respondents suggested creating small or tiny home communities. • 12 respondents suggested revitalizing existing neighborhoods and focusing on neighborhood integrity. • 12 respondents suggested creating homebuyer assistance opportunities. • 12 respondents suggested improving transportation as a way to address housing issues. • 12 respondents suggested providing incentives and/or help to developers to create housing. • 10 respondents suggested creating affordable rental housing. Page 148 of 223 100CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 1. All we need now is land... We don't need power, we can use solar, we don't need water if there is a natural well. We don't need sewage we can use septic systems. The septic systems will take care of yard watering. But maybe instead of building apartments, we build something better. Multiple single fam houses on a large swath of land that is used as communal. I don't know a single person who wouldn't rather live in the country and see the stars than 6 ft from the 400k dollar house I just bought to the one right next to me. Took me 25 years to save up and get this first home too. And I may not be able to keep it one day. I would like to help though, I am a troubleshooter and have a great many ideas that may be useful. Just no way to implement. 2. No. Just let the free market work! As soon as homes start becoming harder to sell, prices will fall. 3. Lower taxes via more frugal local public spending. 4. Stop raising taxes! I can afford my mortgage payment but the taxes are so high now it's a struggle to afford to live in CS. I can't sell either because there is no affordable housing elsewhere (not even to rent). 5. Smaller house neighborhoods (upper scale) to support downsizing and the elderly (retired) population. 6. Enforecement of reguations when people violate the rules. 7. Eliminate single-family zoning and allow middle housing to be built in any neighborhood (duplex, triplex, townhomes/condos, small apartments). Done in California, Oregon, Washington, Montana and Maine and countless cities in the US. 8. Our daughter worked with the Human Resource Council in Missoula, MT. They are using some creative techniques to address housing needs. I've also been following Houston's attempts to address the same issue in Houston Chronicle articles. 9. I have seen the use of 3D printed homes reduce construction costs. 10. Limit how much rent can go up annually! Stop the landlord preference. Stop allowing slum lords to exist! 11. The city needs more parks that people can walk in - not parks that are just for sports. There are so many people living in apartments that don't have parks nearby to get outside safely. 12. Tax incentives for developers. Building fee reduction or forgiveness. Expedited review processes. 13. We need to increase property taxes for rental homeowners. The housing market is too competitive for first time homebuyers that get out-bid by multi-million dollar investors who want to make a quick buck off their rental properties. The city needs to prioritize local young professionals that are considering moving away from College Station because they can't afford to buy their first home. If there was less incentive for investors to buy houses and rent them out to students, more young professionals would be able to continue to work and live in College Station. 14. Stop allowing so many luxury student apartments. Everything is either super expensive or an unfit place to live. 15. I believe the Texas Ave/University plan is a great idea to encourage mix-use development with high-density of housing units, but there is no incentive for a developer to take that plan and run with it. Something that large would take one or two big developers to acquire all that property to have it work as intended, and there are too many barriers for anyone to attempt it. Page 149 of 223 101CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 16. Incentives to landlords to take housing vouchers (section 8). 17. Smaller lots and more density with larger, accessible common areas. Public transportation that eliminates the need for two-car households - that extra car payment can go to a house payment. 18. Tiny home communities for house less or low income/middle income. 19. Look at the programs in Houston and San Antonio. 20. I think you are creating "needs". We have dozens of new (last 10 years) apartment complexes, condos, new neighborhoods (midtown). Developers and bank lending drive this, the City could excel and providing excellent roads, utilities, parks, swimming pools (a lap pool would be excellent) since Bryan Aquatics is always packed and stay out of funding housing. We see where Fannie Mae got us. 21. Mixing young adults and elderly in living spaces: search.yahoo.com/search?fr=mcafee&type=E211US885G0&p=elderly+living+with+young+adults 22. Designate districts in which students can reside/incentivize investors into specific areas and rezone some of them to allow for multi-tenant situations. You need to segregate family neighborhoods from student neighborhoods especially for lower-income families. 23. Affordable housing for faculty provided by or in collaboration with the university. 24. Yes, better mass transit. Bring back trolleys to move people around town. 25. I feel like the 4 room apartment complexes have jacked up normal apartment housing costs. 26. Move the students out of established residential areas. 27. Stop catering to investment companies. 28. Smaller master planned communities with variety in housing types and included commercial/retail amenities. 29. Mixed use walkable dense development, please! 30. Provide housing for people who have criminal histories w/out having to pay triple deposits and denied housing simply because of a past criminal history. 31. Universities typically provide lots of student housing. Build affordable housing further from campus and invest in stellar public transit to campus. 32. Parking hubs for public transport so that people live in suburbs/exterior and can more easily commute in. 33. Housing that can be purchased for the same amount that we pay for rent. 34. Assistance for property owners who rent to others. Allow homestead exemption. 35. Micro-apartments for low-income individuals or students. Oregon and Washington state have recently begun using these. 36. A&M needs to provide more "on campus" housing. 37. All apartments should be mixed incomes. 38. Caps on rent based on median income and caps on rent increases based on inflation. Page 150 of 223 102CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 39. Rental discounts for employees. I worked in a school in Houston and I got a 15% discount on rent because of it. 40. If we had a better bus/transit system over all, less people would need cars, and people would have more income to cover rent. 41. Taxing properties and apartment units that sit vacant for a certain amount of time to artificially inflate pricing and keeping the demand high and the supply of houses low. It is a very common practice, especially for apartment rentals in College Station. 42. Tiny homes for low income. 43. I know some neighborhoods in College Station require that an owner live in the home, even if other rooms are rented out. So many of the starter homes are rented out year after year, completely trashed, then placed up for sale. First, we have to compete with investors who have more money. Then, if we do find a home we can afford, it is so trashed we can't afford repairs. 44. Work with the university to freeze the increase in admissions of students so the housing market is destroyed for the employees who make their education possible. The housing market is oversaturated with too many students and this attracts investors trying to turn a profit because students' parents will pay exorbitant rents. 45. Capping the allowable annual rent increase at a percentage of the existing rent; passing laws to prevent landlord collusion /price fixing (they all agree to increase the rent to something no one can afford); more condos/townhomes that can be rented or purchased; fewer HOAs - they're predatory and I refuse to pay into one, which seriously restricts my buying options. 46. Stop letting realtors buy up single family homes to rent to students instead of long-term residents. 47. I think there needs to more zoning areas for manufactured or modular homes. 48. Rental Caps. 49. Stop allowing per bedroom rentals of single family homes, limit the number of short term rentals (air bnb etc) in neighborhoods. 50. A bad strategy from Provo, UT (BYU): They have many small homes, 3-6 bedrooms, where students rent out a room. Extremely inefficient and causes massive parking issues with 3-5 cars per home. I see this beginning to happen in my neighborhood. In general, the biggest gap I see is affordable places for those who have recently graduated college (i.e. working their first job, graduate students, oftentimes trying to start families). Or just places for college students whose parents don't pay their rent. Almost every affordable place requires having at least one roommate which is not ideal for people trying to start their lives (and maybe a family) in college station. 51. More options to have affordable modular homes on land. 52. Strong incentives for infill development and redevelopment rather than sprawl, i.e., encouraging densificiation and providing more housing options at the same time. 53. Tiny Homes. 54. UBI has already showed results in areas of Texas. It improves quality of life and goes to mostly rent and bills, you'd have less stressed out workers and students, able to do more good in their lives, meaning more good can be done for our community too. Page 151 of 223 103CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 55. Less homes that rent by the room which seem to be eveywhere. 56. Rent to own would help out a lot of people. 57. I got assistance buying my first home and it set me on my way to more wealth. It was an older fixer upper and I got a low interest loan from the county to rehab the house thus adding value and desirability. The houses on glade street are tired for instance. Don't let developers tear them down giver first time homebuyers a chance to buy low and rehab. We need to get students back on campus and families back in college station homes. Discourage football houses! 58. Get rid of zoning. Let the market decide. Central planning has a terrible track record we are living with now. 59. Don't allow or remove Residential Occupancy Overlays that decrease the number of people allowed to rent/live in a house, thus driving up the cost of rentals. 60. Support for staff working in k-12 schools. 61. Allow tiny homes; have better (more) public transportation. 62. Improve walk/bike access to grocery stores. 63. Right now growth of the university outpaces available housing. Landlords have also gotten greedy and prices to rent an apartment have gone up astronomically in the last few years. I've actually considered moving to Magnolia because it's cheaper and because I don't have to deal with the absolutely strange rental market because of all of the college students and summer rentals. I work at the university, but to move from my current Bryan apartment to a duplex in College Station, the College Station duplex is will require 150 days notice if I don't want to renew my lease. It's ridiculous. At this point, I would like for the university to build housing for faculty and staff, which is done in other places that are usually considered high cost of living. It's getting unafforable to live here. We also need more on campus or close to campus housing for students that is affordable. We need something similar to the Barracks, but for faculty and staff. There's no way I would live there as a non-student, but the idea is nice. 64. Mixed use zoning in high density areas so businesses can exist on ground foor of >3 story apartments. 65. Introduce legislation or city ordinance to ban private equity firms from buying single family homes and renting them at an exorbitant cost. 66. Middle housing options other than large student houses in neighborhoods. 67. No, I just want to be able to afford to live where I work AND afford a family. 68. Reduction of debt carried by the city would allow more tax revenue to be used to assist the citizens of BCS. 69. Incentivize redevelopment of the run down areas, stop letting pockets of crime areas spread and chase the crime out, not the middle class. This town needs more quality of life focus in its development and redevelopment, not just money grabs and a push for growth, growth, and more growth. 70. No more apartments. Page 152 of 223 104CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 71. Yes stop catering to the students and realize other people live here too that make a middle income with little to no options for housing!! Make it make sense!! 72. Look at living on the outskirts of town. 73. Convert vacant office buildings to housing. 74. I think a tiny home village like the one in Willis/Conroe area would be nice to have here. 75. Expand out to rural area to build more apartment to give people more options rather than having to live in the city. 76. Tiny or small (2 bedroom or less) home neighborhoods. 77. Raise property tax rates along with homestead exemption amounts to discourage absentee owners and encourage owner-occupants. 78. Tenants rights organizations have cropped up across the country lately and the most important work has been to protect tenants from landlords and rental agencies exploiting them. We should work to prevent landlords and rental agencies in the city from raising rent arbitrarily and refusing to meet living standards. 79. Mixed-use developments with shops on bottom and apartments on top are very successful. Removing parking mandates allows for densification and better public transit. Developers should be incentivized to have mixed-income developments and reserve units for affordable housing and to accept Section 8. 80. Mixed use developments, 4 over 1 style apartments (4 levels of apartments over 1 level of shops). 81. Improved public transportation helps housing that is farther away from shops/work feel closer. It some cities, they have light rails which connect neighborhoods with areas to shop and/or work. Buses would work too. They just have to run often enough that you can get places relatively quickly. When traveling, distance is measured in time. Another idea might be to restrict short-term rentals, like Airbnbs. Some cities impose the same tax rates on vacation property owners that hotels are subject to. This increases tax revenue for the city, while discouraging short-term rental properties. Other cities require the host to love in the unit they're renting out. These restrictions would open up housing availability and lower housing costs for residents looking for homes to purchase. 82. Implement a Land Value Tax. 83. Smaller units for less people in relatively dense, walkable areas. Instead of creating luxury living locations around campus to entice the students of wealthy families and donors, the living areas around campus should be kept at lower prices to maintain the college station's viability for medium and low income renters/homeowners. Instead of keeping competitive, large complexes around campus raise prices after arguing demand, but that just isn't sustainable if you're considering the community trying to move into this town - mostly broke college students. 84. Keep neighborhood integrity. 85. I would like to see items already on the books enforced. Neighborhood integrity absolutely depends upon homeowners and renters. If the homeowner is renting it out, keeping up maintenance and attractiveness of each dwelling place whether it be a house, and apartment, or a duplex. Letting people get away with having trash in the yards unkempt yards, and obvious more than allowable people living in a place should be actively enforced and fined. Page 153 of 223 105CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 86. Yes, STOP THE AGGIE SHACKS... you are destroying our neighborhoods. 87. Adapting old, vacant buildings into multi-family residences - for instance, old malls developed into senior residences, especially ones in the Netherlands which are contained cities that allow people with dementia to have a semblance of normal life. 88. Virtually all other college towns with out student ratio limit occupancy of ALL single family housing to 2-unrelated so that working class families can compete. That may not be the answer, but the sharp contrast with our attitudes toward working class families make the point that we are not even having an honest conversation about root causes - and don't plan to. The lack of affordable housing for lower income is due to "student gentrification". We only have 24,000 single family homes. The university has operated on a for-profit model for almost 2 decades and their profit is maximized by taking more family neighborhoods rather than plan and invest in appropriate, higher density housing (4-5 story apartments). We don't necessarily want them to own this housing, but we do need them to find ways to incentivize it. Other university towns have. 89. I do not believe the city should be involved in this activity. 90. Let the market decide - the government should stay out of it! 91. Priortize the needs of the poor. 92. I attended the University of Alabama, they had "University Housing Zoning" that allowed up to 5 unrelated in a single family home, but the rest of town was strictly enforced to no more than 2 unrelated. It worked well. 93. Married student housing and No More that 2 unrelated zoning. 94. Having housing units above retail spaces. 95. Master communities with amenities. 96. Limit houses used for temporary rentals such as Air Bnbs. 97. Underground living options. 98. Mixed use spaces. 99. Rent is just too high for single moms. 100. Rental options is not the option. People could afford a mortgage if they weren't paying $1500/month in rent that does not allow them to save for a home down payment. 101. Less taxes means more people can afford to own their own home versus renting. 102. All I can say is Texas A&M should realize it coexists with BCS and get involved in this strategic action plan in a meaningful and constructive way (which also includes spending money)! 103. If the need is more affordable housing then areas of new development should be developed. This survey will provide information only if you get it to the people who actually need more affordable housing. Not sure how you are doing that. 104. Mixed use residential/commercial. 105. Redevelop the mall into a mix-used planned community. Page 154 of 223 106CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 106. CAP THE RENT before CS is infested with homelessness!!!!!!!!!!!!!! CS has so many Californians Moving here and making our homes unreachable for Texans!!! 107. Spreading out the assistance to different areas instead of concentrating it in small areas (like affordable housing apartment buildings). 108. Yes...in Chicago, and in San Francisco. 109. We need to put a stop to the slums and dilapidated houses from being rented. We need to mandate all rental properties are to undergo a thorough inspection from an independent licensed home inspector for safety and serviceability every 3-5 years. We need to demand that companies and property owners are mandated by law to maintain homes for safety and serviceability. We need to mandate properties be built with extra insulation and in an energy efficient manner, especially for mobile and modular homes. 110. I have personally seen the problem of short-term rental companies coming and buying up all the affordable housing leaving nothing left for the people who live and work in the local area. Because they are a company and have more loans and financial leverage, etc., they are able to place the highest bids on houses which push out the regular everyday people who live and work here. Regular families aren't able to compete with corporations, LLC's, etc. Because they are short term rental, they can earn 2-3's the amount of long term rentals. It's just completely unfair. 111. Tiny home villages. Theres also a dementia village built in the Netherlands that may be a good idea for elderly persons as a model set up. 112. No building student housing or apartments near family residences and schools. 113. Advanced transportation between apt complexes,the university and grocery store. Incentivize apt dwelling with amazing transportation. 114. Mixed-use housing with commercial space on the 1st floor. 115. Bigger lots. 116. Give existing homeowners the ability to gently upzone their properties by right. City-wide, single step, by-right upzoning. If you have a single family neighborhood, allow ADUs/duplexes. If neighborhood is duplexes, allow triplexes. And so on. Use gov't funding and other incentives to focus on lower income existing homeowners so they can afford to do the renovations/building needed to create the additional housing on their land. Focus on homeowners creating rental opportunities. 117. Support existing zoning and opposed rezoning of already planned neighborhoods. 118. Incentivize developers to build 600sqft - 1,100 sqft patio homes perfect for downsizing, first homes, affordability, great for seniors too, and low maintenance. Not everyone wants or needs a huge house and the financial burden. Provide small but quality, energy efficient homes with small private yards, covered back porch and garage/covered carport off-street parking. These patio home neighborhoods can provide common green spaces/parks and walking trails/sidewalks. 119. There are many aspects that go into creating an affordable community including walkable amenities, good mass transit, and bikes as a means of transportation. Affordable housing also depends on developers paying their fair share so that existing housing is not subsidizing new sprawl development. 120. Innovative ADUs to take advantage of leftover land, parcels. Page 155 of 223 107CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 121. East Austin homeless housing project. 122. Reducing the regulations/restrictions to reduce barriers to development. 123. Incentives for accessory dwelling units. 124. Allow shared housing in all multi family districts. 125. Strong partnership with habitat for humanity. 126. Force developers to make wider streets in newer neighborhoods so parking is allowed on the street. 127. Student housing should be kept near campus or Highways only. NOT single family neighborhoods. 128. Yes! Tiny Homes aka Pocket Neighborhoods. 129. Less "builder" homes and more normal homes. 130. Allow developers with affordable housing community ideas to build new developments that include whole foods. 131. See notes above; I've been watching the housing developments in Hempstead and Montgomery for the past seven years. The homes are two bedroom "tiny homes" but bigger than 500 sq ft/ less than 1000 sq ft. Modern amenities, small yard footprint, cheaper/affordable for small "professional" families. Or building more townhome/condos specifically for the same type of family. Specifically for families and not student-driven. 132. There was once discussion of using existing TAMU land to house students. The issue for residents of the city, especially single moms, is that most rental properties charge per room. This makes sense with college students but for a single mom with multiple kids - that is untenable. If we could creatively house a majority of students on existing TAMU land, rental and mortgage prices would fall allowing working residents an opportunity to live a more healthy, sustainable life. 133. Generational homes. 134. Addressing/discouraging crime in less expensive neighborhoods. While more affordable, these neighborhoods tend to have high crime rates. It seems like the "safest" neighborhoods are most often the most expensive. 135. Let the market dictate what housing prices are and what types need to be built. 136. Cut regulations and zoning that limits what people can do with their properties. The free market is more nimble than gov and will resolve any need that is there!! 137. Incentivize developers with tax breaks, recruit companies to move to CS so students stay after graduation. 138. Use of high-rise multi-family housing in city center. 139. Austin - bond issue for funding low income repairs. 140. High-rise buildings are a very good solution, as long as there is ample parking and the City can support the utility and roadwork needs of the community. 141. Making laws about residency. So many homes are being purchased by people who don't live here but are using the properties as AirBnBs for gamedays. Page 156 of 223 108CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 142. Repurposing existing, empty commercial buildings to apartment complexes. 143. A program like Habitat to humanity they help people Built homes. 144. Convert vacant motels into affordable housing for low income or homeless people. 145. A city/county that is not jacking up debt constantly. 146. Evaluate what is truly necessary in what is required for developers to provide finished lots, and the code requirements for builders. 147. Tiny village home community. 148. Teacher housing grants/loans. 149. Abolish CSAN. 150. Incentivize Builders and developers to build small affordable homes on smaller lots by waiving permit and impact fees and other costly requirements. 151. No. CS's housing problems could somewhat be addressed by the university controlling their population. A&M knows they don't have the infrastructure, nor do Bryan/CS to handle the ever increasing student population. 152. Yes: stop erecting new restrictions. No more than two unrelated for housing adjacent to Texas A&M... decreasing density and increasing the amount of commuters trying to get to campus daily? -please abandon these policies which only increase traffic problems and exacerbate housing affordability. 153. Block no more than four ordinance. 154. Incentivize to build instead of adding to cost with regulatory fees. 155. Abolish No More Than Four. 156. Stop over-regulating. You already had to repeal the STR regulations. You should repeal the ADU regulations as well. Allow residents to have more options and flexibility. 157. I see the same sized homes/plans from builders in Houston, building here and the prices here are $100k+ more than the Houston area. Start with speaking to the builders about why. Is it purchasing land, infrastructure, utilities? What is making CS so expensive to buy com-pared to municipalities that are around our size? Ex.) Gehan Homes. 158. I would like to see grants to remodel/repair older homes in stable neighborhoods so that buying an existing home isn't as daunting for low-income families. 159. Shift the Property Tax to a Land Value Tax, or a split rate tax. 160. Not that I can think of. 161. You have two separate issues: 1-creating student housing and 2-creating affordable housing. Sometimes they overlap, sometimes they don't. For students, updating old structures/buildings to create apartments/condos. For affordable housing, Tucson, AZ updated the downtown barrio area without displacing residents. 162. Group homes for elderly with altzhiemers 163. Eliminate parking minimums. Page 157 of 223 109CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 164. Universal Basic Income. 165. The city should not have restricted duplexes and fourplexes in south College Station as the town was growing. Allowing those on the edges of newer neighborhoods would help. 166. You might try working with developers to see what land is available and let us have some input. Some of us deal with raw land and others are good at infill. 167. Houses made from shipping containers for low income population. 168. Probably but I can't remember yet. I'll have to email later. 169. Current apartment complexes designating a number of units to be rented at lower cost for low income families; tony home neighborhoods for low income or homeless (can be used as a transition housing accompanied with other programs); churches building affordable housing on their unused property. 170. Tiny home communities for the homeless. 171. Prevent renting by the bedroom in established neighborhoods, make A&M provide more student housing. 172. Venice Community housing - intensive case management; wealthy donors. 173. Tiny home communities, master planned townhouses off of Wellborn. 174. No but it's way too expensive here and I will have to move if nothing gets done. 175. Keep government out of homebuyers business. 176. More single level patio home communities for seniors not ready for senior retirement housing. 177. I don't care but stop raising my taxes or I won't be able to live here either. 178. No. I've run a non-profit affordable housing company, and I think what is important to the citizens that don't need affordable housing is that the affordable housing that is built, stick built, manufactured, whatever, is that it, and all the property it sits on, will always be well maintained, lawns mowed, flower beds clean, etc. There needs to be something similar to the permanent maintenance trust established for cemeteries, with strong enforcement provisions. Plus, of course, assurance that police enforcement will be strict. In summary, the problem most affluent folks have with affordable housing is how it's going to look years down the road, and will it create social issues. The actual type of housing is not the real issue. 179. There should be private/public partnerships to build housing near the campus. The City should not rezone and destroy neighborhoods where people already live with the expectation of single family housing. Students would be safer in dorms/apartments on campus. 180. Stop raising property taxes. 181. Tiny Hope Village in Hearne, TX. 182. A&M needs to build apartment complexes run by university that are affordable. No more stealth dorms. No airbnb in neighborhoods. No more students buying family homes. 183. Permanent housing for the homeless seems to work best for homelessness issues. It provides an address, which then allows the individual to apply for assistance programs that they need. Page 158 of 223 110CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 184. Universities should build affordable housing on campus. 185. More financial and retirement planning education. 186. Keep housing affordable for single families. 187. Other Texas cities spend much more wisely. 188. High rise student housing. 189. Preserving existing neighborhoods. 190. Do not destroy the older neighborhoods. 191. Allow remodeling only if it matches the existing character of the neighborhood. 192. Provide more dorm options for university students so you avoid having to displace students who live in limited non related households. 193. Annex areas around the city to provide more affordable housing. Page 159 of 223 111CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN STUDENTSURVEY SURVEY RESULTS Q1 - Where is your residence? ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES College Station 86.32%1,413 Bryan 13.13%215 Other (please specify)0.55%9 TOTAL 1,637 College Station Bryan Other(please specify) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answered: 1,637 Skipped: 0 Page 160 of 223 112CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q2 - Which institution do you attend? (check all that apply) ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Texas A&M University 99.63%1,630 Blinn College 1.53%25 Texas A&M RELLIS 1.71%28 Sam Houston State University 0.06%1 Other (please specify)0.24%4 TOTAL 1,636 Q3 - Are you an undergraduate or graduate/professional student? ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Undergraduate 74.07%1,211 Graduate or professional student 25.93%424 TOTAL 1,635 Texas A&M University Blinn College Texas A&M RELLIS Sam Houston State University Other (please specify) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answered: 1,636 Skipped: 1 Undergraduate Graduate orprofessional student 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answered: 1,635 Skipped: 2 Page 161 of 223 113CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q4 - Are you married? ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes 5.87%96 No 94.13%1,540 TOTAL 1,636 Q5 - Do you have dependent children? ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes 1.95%32 No 98.05%1,605 TOTAL 1,637 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Yes No Answered: 1,636 Skipped: 1 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Yes No Answered: 1,637 Skipped: 0 Page 162 of 223 114CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q6 - Are you a full-time or part-time student at your institution? ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Full-time 96.09%1,572 Part-time 3.91%64 TOTAL 1,636 Q7 - Have you applied for and been deemed eligible to receive a Pell Grant? A Pell Grant is a need-based federal aid for students in college or other post-secondary education to help low-income student pays for college costs. ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes 20.20%330 No 72.71%1,188 Not Sure 7.10%116 TOTAL 1,634 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Full-time Part-time Answered: 1,636 Skipped: 1 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Yes No Not Sure Answered: 1,634 Skipped: 3 Page 163 of 223 115CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q8 - Are you a first generation student? The Higher Education Act of 1965 and 1998 defines a first-generation college student as "a student both of whose parents did not compete a bachelor's degree, or in the case of students who live with and are supported by only one parent, a student whose only such parent did not complete a bachelor's degree." ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes 22.26%364 No 76.45%1,250 Not Sure 1.28%21 TOTAL 1,635 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answered: 1,635 Skipped: 2 Yes No Not Sure Page 164 of 223 116CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q9 - Which option best describes your residence? ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES University residence hall/dormitory 11.44%187 University owned apartment 2.63%43 Private rental apartment 41.00%670 Private rental – single family home (rented with other students)20.99%343 Private rental – single family home (renting space from non-student who also lives there)1.59%26 Private rental – duplex, triplex, condo, town home, or accessory dwelling unit 15.06%246 Sorority/Fraternity House 1.71%28 Personally owned residence - house, condo, townhouse, duplex.4.10%67 No stable residence 0.18%3 Other (please specify)1.29%21 TOTAL 1,634 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% University residence hall/dormitory University owned apartment Private rental apartment Private rental – single family home(rented with other students) Private rental – single family home Private rental – duplex, triplex, condo,town home, or accessory dwelling unit Sorority/Fraternity House Personally owned residence -house, condo, townhouse, duplex No stable residence Other (please specify) Answered: 1,634 Skipped: 3 Page 165 of 223 117CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q10 - What are your most important factors when searching for potential housing? Choose your top five. ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Price 97.25%1,592 Proximity to campus/academic buildings 85.52%1,400 Access to transit to campus 48.44%793 Property amenities (pool, free coffee, gym, etc…)21.01%344 Proximity to public amenities (gym, bars, restaurants, parks, etc…)19.30%316 Safety 72.51%1,187 Proximity to work 20.16%330 Size of space 55.71%912 Physical condition/modernity of space 65.97%1,080 Living around other students 27.12%444 Proximity to grocery stores 31.15%510 Other (please specify)7.27%119 TOTAL 1,637 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Price Proximity to campus/academic buildings Access to transit to campus Property amenities(pool, free coee, gym, etc.) Proximity to public amenities(gym, bars, restaurants, parks, etc.) Safety Proximity to work Size of space Physical condition/modernity of space Living around other students Proximity to grocery stores Other (please specify) Answered: 1,637 Skipped: 0 Page 166 of 223 118CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q11 - What is a deal breaker that would prevent you from selecting a certain housing accommodation? (Select all that apply) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Sharing a bedroom Sharing a bathroom Sharing a unit (but not a bedroom) No kitchen No laundry facilities in unit/on premises Not within walking distance of campus Not within biking/skateboarding/hoverboarding/scooter distance to campus Housing being on-campus/university owned No easy access to grocery stores Lack of high speed internet Lack of electronic capabilities Neighborhood looks old and run down Lack of adequate security None of the above are dealbreakers Other (please specify) Answered: 1,635 Skipped: 2 Page 167 of 223 119CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Sharing a bedroom 67.22%1,099 Sharing a bathroom 35.84%586 Sharing a unit (but not a bedroom)6.67%109 No kitchen 83.67%1,368 No laundry facilities in unit/on premises 83.12%1,359 Not within walking distance of campus 14.01%229 Not within biking/skateboarding/hoverboarding/scooter distance to campus 19.69%322 Housing being on-campus/university owned 14.56%238 No easy access to grocery stores 27.95%457 Lack of high speed internet 68.50%1,120 Lack of electronic capabilities (able to control lights, sound, temperature, locks with cell phone)23.98%392 Neighborhood looks old and run down (buildings or streets in disrepair, paint peeling, poorly tended vegetation, etc…)50.95%833 Lack of adequate security 61.65%1,008 None of the above are dealbreakers 0.43%7 Other (please specify)5.87%96 TOTAL 1,635 Page 168 of 223 120CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q12 - On a scale from 1 to 9, where 9 means very interested and 1 is not at all interested, how interested would you be in living in this type of housing? University-owned residence hall Answered: 1,624 Skipped: 13 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% University owned apartment/suite Page 169 of 223 121CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN University partnership with ano-campus apartment complex 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Private apartment 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Private single-family house Page 170 of 223 122CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Private duplex 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Private rowhome/town home 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Private accessory dwelling unit(a smaller unit located on the same lotas a stand-alone single-family home) Page 171 of 223 123CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN ANSWER CHOICES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 TOTAL University-owned residence hall 40.95% 665 13.18% 214 11.33% 184 6.65% 108 9.54% 155 5.42% 88 4.25% 69 3.57% 58 5.11% 83 1,624 University owned apartment/suite 20.33% 330 9.61% 156 10.72% 174 9.43% 153 13.12% 213 10.54% 171 10.78% 175 7.02% 114 8.44% 137 1,623 University partnership with an off-campus apartment complex 13.13% 213 4.25% 69 7.58% 123 8.51% 138 12.02% 195 14.00% 227 16.52% 268 10.48% 170 13.50% 219 1,622 Private apartment 3.21% 52 1.11% 18 2.16% 35 4.50% 73 8.32% 135 10.05% 163 17.76% 288 18.87% 306 34.03% 552 1,622 Private single- family house 5.75% 93 2.04% 33 3.46% 56 3.09% 50 6.18% 100 7.05% 114 11.56% 187 14.35% 232 46.51% 752 1,617 Private duplex 5.44% 88 2.35% 38 2.84% 46 5.07% 82 9.70% 157 11.06% 179 17.61% 285 16.93% 274 28.99% 469 1,618 Private rowhome/ townhome 4.88% 79 1.61% 26 2.90% 47 4.45% 72 7.91% 128 9.57% 155 17.36% 281 17.79% 288 33.54% 543 1,619 Private accessory dwelling unit ( a smaller unit located on the same lot as a stand-alone single-family home.) 15.54% 251 7.31% 118 10.65% 172 11.27% 182 13.25% 214 10.90% 176 11.02% 178 7.24% 117 12.82% 207 1,615 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Page 172 of 223 124CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q13 - How often do you worry about affording rent or housing? ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES a. Never 12.63%206 b. Rarely 14.59%238 c. Sometimes 31.09%507 d. Often 25.08%409 e. All the time 16.62%271 TOTAL 1,631 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% a. Never b. Rarely c. Sometimes d. Often e. All the time Answered: 1,631 Skipped: 6 Page 173 of 223 125CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q14 - What types of rental assistance programs would you be interested in? ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Programs that provide affordable rental options 92.90%1,046 Education programs to minimize existing expenses (home repair, energy savings, etc…)44.14%497 Tenant protections like rent increase notices and longer eviction notice terms 1.15%13 Assistance for making properties more energy efficient 35.35%398 Employer assisted housing programs 26.47%298 Programs to match students with local senior citizens who want to rent a room in their house to a student 21.76%245 TOTAL 1,126 Q15 - Do you have any additional thoughts about housing that you would like to share? Answered: 602 Skipped: 1,035 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Programs that provide aordable rental options Education programs to minimize existingexpenses (home repair, energy savings, etc.) Tenant protections like rent increase noticesand longer eviction notice terms Assistance for making propertiesmore energy ecient Employer assisted housing programs Programs to match students with local senior citizenswho want to rent a room in their house to a student Answered: 1,126 Skipped: 511 Page 174 of 223 126CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS AND RESPONSES Student Survey Analysis and Responses to the Question “Do you have any additional thoughts about housing you would like to share?” 460 respondents gave an answer to the question “Do you have any additional thoughts about housing you would like to share?” (responses like “no” or “not at this time” were removed and not included). Here are the major trends in the responses: • 160 respondents mentioned housing or rent being too expensive. ∙13 of these stated that there should be rent control measures ∙14 of these mentioned that their fixed income (mostly graduate student) was not enough to pay for housing. • 115 respondents mentioned the no more than four unrelated occupancy restrictions negatively, requesting the rule be abolished or changed. ∙5 respondents mentioned the no more than four unrelated occupancy restrictions in a favorable light. • 63 respondents mentioned transportation related issues, siting issues with traffic, walkability, public transportation (including bus routes), parking, and affording a vehicle. • 38 respondents mentioned difficulties with landlords and property management companies. Issues with maintenance, responsiveness, and general fairness were noted. Some stated the need for tenant protections. • 34 respondents stated that density should be increased, specifically around campus. ∙11 respondents made comments that were opposed to increased density, stating concerns with loosing the character of places like specific neighborhoods or areas like Northgate. • 30 respondents expressed a desire to live close to campus. • 21 respondents mentioned the desire for certain amenities like recycling/compost, space for pets, pools, gyms, community space, etc. • 16 respondents mentioned safety concerns, especially in areas where housing is affordable. • 15 mentioned issues with leases, mostly that lease terms do not match academic semesters. • 14 respondents stated that older, more affordable housing is undesirable because of it’s condition. • 10 responded that it is difficult for international students to navigate the housing system. • 10 graduate students responded that it is difficult for them to find housing that meets their needs. • 6 students with families responded that it is difficult for them to find housing that meets their needs. Page 175 of 223 127CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 1. As a Student looking for affordable and safe place to live. 2. BCS is already over built and yet housing prices keep increasing. There needs to be a halt on building more housing and have the current ones re-newed. We are forced to pay for the expensive apartments because the cheaper ones are sketchy and most likely infested with something. We are already in debt from paying tuition, we shouldn't be forced to pay $1,000/month for a decent room. 3. The rent is super high in CS N Bryan. With the on going recession it is hard to live with the cost and rent. It would be easier if the rent can be managed under 500 for a single family apartment. 4. No enough cooking place. 5. Build more missing middle housing, densify around campus in existing single-family neighborhoods, build protected bicycle lanes. 6. Want to live close to campus. Please allow me to live close by sharing a house with my friends! 7. The more free the market, the easier it’d be to alleviate this issue. 8. The Lofts at Wolf Pen Creek is horrid and should be shut down. 9. Rent has gone pretty high. It should be regulated. 10. Leasing contracts are for a complete year, not for the months during which the apartment is used. Also, subleasing is not easy to achieve. 11. I think there should be more housing real estate close to campus so people can walk and easily transport. 12. Having low noise level areas, close to nature, only 1 roommate. 13. I think more freshman-only dorms should be constructed, to ensure that incoming fresh-man who want the full on-campus experience get the chance to partake in it. 14. Need one semester leases. Off campus housing is too expensive, paper cheques are used for deposits. Need to provide info to international students without guarantors. 15. Things are getting expensive and i am just so stressed. 16. Don't be afraid to exercise eminent domain and purchase houses from homeowners (mainly seniors) in order to best serve the community. Awkwardly placed homes and suburbia is a massive factor on why the United States rates badly in terms of walkability compared to places in Europe, Japan, Singapore, etc. 17. Housing/Apartment expenses are rising everywhere. It is becoming difficult to be a full time student who has a part time job trying to pay rent. 18. Affordability is the top priority for me and I think everything else can be managed. 19. Please eliminate “me + 3” too many students are suffering as a result of this. 20. Students cannot afford the increase in prices that is happening everywhere for no apparent reason. My apartment increased rent by 100$ for next year all because "everyone is doing it". It is unfair. 21. There needs to be a lot more student housing close to campus. The no-more-then-four policy is harmful to students, who make College Station what it is. Car ownership is prohibitively expensive and not an option for many students, and bike lanes and walkability needs to be improved all around campus. Lower speeds and mixed use development along George Bush Dr would encourage a healthy level of development in this area. College Station has the opportunity to benefit from the 70,000 students that attend A&M. Making the city more livable and affordable for students and young adults is a smart way to capitalize on College Station's greatest asset. 22. The price of housing continues to rise and has pushed me out of college station. Because tamu doesn’t pay enough and there’s been no cost of living adjustments made. 23. Existing off-campus student apartments need to be inspected for mold and leaks, and property owners required to fix these issues. 24. Allowing companies to tear down cheaper housing in order to build student housing close to campus is not the answer. 25. I'm not opposed to living around high-rise apartments or single family homes, but I prefer living in mid-rise housing. In my personal, subjective perspective, I perceive high rise apartments as demeaning the individual overly much while single family homes and other low density housing options prioritize the individual too much at the cost of a vibrant public/social life. Page 176 of 223 128CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 26. The college station housing mafia is an absolute pain in the ass. The best thing the city could do is prevent corporate ownership of housing communities. Ever since I moved into an apartment with an actual landlord that I could hold accountable (instead of some "community director"), my renting experience has improved DRASTICALLY. The four-bedroom apartment I just moved out of hiked its rent by about 80% over the course of three years. I found a privately owned SINGLE-BEDROOM place for a little above half that price. 27. I believe there should be more places that offer housing opportunities further away from campus, but at lower prices. Currently, most private apartment places have similar prices regardless on their location. 28. While we are seeing a large amount of complexes being built, all of these units are unaffordable. Low Income Students have to take out loans or work a ridiculous amount of hours to pay for housing. 29. More high rise apartment buildings and removal of amenities is not the answer. Rent price control is. 30. College isn't just for 20 year olds anymore, needs should be fix more around 30-50 year olds who are finishing up. 31. There is a large international student community in College Station, programs to help them find affordable housing, understanding and signing lease terms and understanding overall costs associated will help. 32. Not a big fan of car dependency. 33. Housing is overpriced in CS and Bryan. Crazy how Reveille rd has so many vendors to live there. 34. College station is a city that is growing fast. With this growth I think we need to prioritize housing. I am in favor of creating more density, especially near and around campus. When it comes to the Northgate area, I believe a plan similar to the one that was layed out for West Campus in Austin would be great for Northgate. That plan has been a resounding success and been a boom for the local area while promoting housing and restaurants. For the other areas surrounding campus, such as east of Texas and south of George Bush, we need to promote density. Far too much of this area is R1 zoned. This is some of the most valuable land in the city and building denser housing should be legal and easy. These areas don’t need to be consumed by 5 over 1 apartments, but even something like making large areas near campus available to build duplexes, triplexes, quadplexes, and ADUs. I also believe infusing amenities into these areas, (allowing through zoning), will make these areas more vibrant and exciting for students. If we can increase the student population near campus, we can increase the amount of students biking and walking to campus. This will be a great benefit to a city who sees its traffic volumes increasing every year. Additionally, if we keep college students near campus, we will keep college students from “infiltrating” family areas which I know many locals do not like. Additionally, if we upzone areas near campus that are high student population, there should hopefully be little resistance because students who are renters don’t care about their “neighborhood character” being destroyed. To sum up my beliefs in one sentence, I believe the key to housing in College Station is abundant housing and housing that is dense and centrally located around cam-pus. (Sorry for spelling and typing errors. This small text box is not easy.) 35. Better bike infrastructure to in from campus would solve the transportation solution to campus. 36. I am an exchange student. There needs to be more options that are only 4 monthly leases not 6 monthly I will be leaving the country but will have to pay a further $2,000 on rent. Also the bond situation and payments are difficult, there should be ability for bonds to re-turn to international accounts. The amenities have been amazing making up for the high cost. but $1,100 just to live close to campus is very high. 37. Safety of a resident is my top priority, if there is not security 24/7 there it can be very scary, there has been times that I have been walking to go to work at 5am and there are people on campus that do not look as they belong and it is scary. I want to feel safe. ALSO remember traditions. 38. I would like more properties to offer recycling and composting. 39. Some of the landlords at apartments around campus are super sketch. Students have no other choice but to live in these places since there doesn't seem to be enough housing. They also don't seem to have the resources to do anything when the landlords don't hold up their side of the lease. Part of the issue with housing actually revolves around traffic. I currently live a mile from the bush school and it takes 20 minutes to get there depending on when I leave because of the traffic crossing harvey mitchell. I'd be willing to live farther away if getting to campus was easier (or bike friendly). 40. No more than 4 makes it extremely difficult to afford a private house. Safe, nice, wonderful homes that have been able to be lived in by college students, will be unaffordable in the future. 41. Please stop putting such huge high rise apartment complexes around campus, it takes away from what makes college station the beautiful city it is. Please have concerns about the fact that many affordable housing options for students are in areas with recent shootings. Please focus on affordable but well built housing, a lot of options available (whether marketed as luxury or affordable) are poorly constructed and will not stand the test of time. This will only cause further problems to the city down the line when the cardboard houses and complexes have to be torn down and rebuilt far too soon. Page 177 of 223 129CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 42. Don’t get rid of NorthGate. You’ll lose students. 43. Most of the leases seem to be fixed term, which is far from optimal as I will be moving out in early May and lease ends at the end of July, so I have 2,5 months of unspent housing. My visa (I'm an exchange student) does not even allow me to stay in the country that long. The housing process to my current private townhome apartment was also difficult, as I did not have any US-based information, such as social security number or even phone number before getting here. In addition, the housing complex seem to prefer phone calls over emails, which is again not good if you're living across the world. The housing costs are also major, distinctively higher than in my home country, compared to the level of accommodation. 44. Access to housing and how nice the apartment is very important. 45. Maybe there could be a policy to prevent that all houses in College Station become rentals. I think some management companies are taking over and not leaving affordable housing, not only for students but also young couples who want to start a family -like myself and my fiancé! 46. I find it problematic how much parking we set aside without considering that the space used would have been better used. Parking lots for the apartments take up significant space making them un-walkable. 47. Covered parking is certainly something I think many students consider and would appreciate having access too. 48. My major concerns with housing are affordability (graduate students, especially in the humanities, do NOT get a large stipend), safety, but also a quiet situation so I can do work at home. It's VERY hard to find housing that meets all three of these criteria in the BCS area, which is shocking considering the amount of graduate students likely looking for something similar. 49. In the last few years, rent has gone up a lot, but graduate student stipends have not kept up. 50. Housing is becoming pretty expensive from past few years. As a graduate student with very limited par-time salary it is tough to manage expenses. 51. I want a space with the freedom to cook, play music and participate in my recreational activities that fit my life style. 52. Yes swimming pool and work out. 53. Affordable price. 54. Landlords in College Station take advantage of the students who lease from them. 55. Utilities are very expensive:( 56. In apartments, make sure to leave some nice walkable space outside where I can walk around, chill, sit, and look at nature. 57. More than 4 people should be able to live in a house. 58. College stations tendency to push away it’s homeless problem to Bryan and erase visibility of its poverty without effectively addressing the causes of its poverty. I volunteered at a local homeless shelter and learned just how difficult it is for non students to not only rent in the college station area but how vicious the system is to the underprivileged. If you just have a eviction on your record it can be almost impossible to get a lease or a landlord to help you. There seems to be little to no rent control which causes rent to increase just for the fact that other complexes charge higher values with no genuine competition in the market. the majority of rental properties from what I’ve seen are not locally owned but corporate owned which leads to a investment attitude towards the living situation of students which doesn’t always align with the well being of the community. 59. Rent is beginning to get way too high. 60. Housing sucks here. 61. I am very disappointed that the city is taking actions that are hostile to students (no more than 4) rather than developing actual solutions to a growing population. Road conditions are also a contributing factor to housing selections, BCS has poor road quality. 62. Maybe get rid of non family rental restrictions. 63. It would help a lot with rent to be able to live with more than 4 people. 64. I think more should be done by the city to protect students from predatory housing/apartment management agencies. 65. All private apartments price gauge and don’t really provide anything in return. 66. I have seen the costs of my unit alone rise $250 over the 4 years I've been in college. Page 178 of 223 130CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 67. The "no more than 4 rule" makes it extremely hard for us students to get housing close to campus at a decent price while also mitigating traffic congestion around the BCS area. Many houses are made with more than 4 bedrooms in college station and they can be used. The housing problems will only get worse if the "no more than 4" rule is enforced any longer. 68. High rise apartments on Northgate are ridiculous and not a solution!! 69. Prevent the large overseas rental companies from coming in and massively overcharging rent thereby artificially inflating the entire bcs rental market. 70. It would be a good idea to set up some dirt cheap areas; not very pleasant but helps people like me who aren't super picky with housing and don't have a lot of money. 71. College Station should repeal the rule that only allows four unrelated students to live together. This is a pointless restriction that drives up the cost of rent for students at the lowest income level. 72. Less luxury house and more affordable housing please. :) 73. Get rid of No More Than 4 rule. 74. With the lack of housing close to campus, why is enforcing the 'no more than 3 unrelated people living together' rule so important? 75. This city is doing an alright job. 76. The maximum number of unrelated people in one house being 4 people is counterproductive, makes housing more expensive, and is not practical for a college town with 70,000 students. 77. Keep/make it cheap. 78. Regulate these apartment management more and have them stop taking advantage of students. 79. Inexpensive but also still good quality. 80. I think the on campus housing (dorms) need to be updated as many of them are quite old. Additionally, because the number of on-campus housing available is less than the number of students attending Texas A&M, I think the city/ university should inform incoming first year students of the available options to them. This is especially helpful for those who cannot afford on campus housing. As the years go by I have noticed on-campus housing as well as housing options right outside of campus increase rent prices dramatically each year. I think the city should think about putting a rent ceiling on apartments near Texas A&M's campus as it is getting to a point where it might be impossible for self-funded students or single parent students to pay those high prices. 81. Housing is becoming extremely expensive, and students have to rent. Apartments are taking advantage of this need. 82. Discourage the destruction of College Station landmarks for poorly built high-density housing. RIP Hurricane Harry's 83. I understand that housing is cheaper when 4/5 people live in a 4/5 bedroom house. But, even though college station is a student town, there are families here, older people, the city needs to consider the consequences of building all this student accommodation which may not be used for families. Additionally, no one wants to live in a town were every second building is a dorm, or student filled apartment complex, or the huge skyscrapers that are now towering over Kylie Field. Keep the town small and quaint-that’s why people love it. 84. It feels like housing is a race to secure a location/finding something at an affordable price. It is hard to know who to trust and if pricing is going to be consistent across years. 85. It is insane that if we want to live within a walking distance of campus we have to pay as much as the rent is. This is not fair to those who cannot afford it or cannot commute to campus without accessible transportation or walking distance. Just because them hey don’t have $500+ extra money to put towards rent. 86. Housing in Bryan/College Station is a huge mess and costs a lot for students and families living here or trying to live here. 87. I'd like a good-landlord certification system. 88. Activities in the housing community. 89. It is getting so expensive, and my parents already pay for my college. I don't have to pay for my housing, but for those who do it's such a stressor. My parents can't afford all of this. It is a college town, and I feel that the college students should be prioritized. 90. The house law for only 4 really targets students and is not fair. 91. Access to food and cheap college meals, more dining halls or places to eat open at later times for students. Page 179 of 223 131CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 92. This country at large is facing a huge housing shortage, and I see it right here in College Station too. I fully support and policies that build more housing, especially higher-density or affordable housing over single-family homes. 93. Please stop building over behind northgate the traffic is horrible and it’s just too expensive. Focus on building far enough away where it can be a little more affordable. 94. No more apartments, tell A&M to stop letting so many students in. 95. The rule against no more than four unrelated tenants in a house should not exists. 96. No more new townhomes! The college student housing market is pushing out the socioeconomically disadvantaged families of the BCS area. 97. Limits on how many people can stay at a house. 98. I would prefer single parent families in the area to still be able to afford housing and not be pushed out. 99. I think there should be more options for college students with pets. So many properties either don’t have backyards or do have backyards and do not allow pets. They also love to charge many unreasonable and hidden fees to college students not realizing some of us pay for everything ourselves. 100. Don't add rules and regulations like California. Don't get in the way of private industry. Government involvement has a 99% statistical correlation to price increases in goods and services. If you want cheaper housing then lower the bar to entry for building new private residences. Do not subsidize. Do not regulate. Do not be California. Thanks Gig'em! 101. Build more apartments near campus such as Rise and Aspire along University Dr. 102. Hope apartments don’t run out the bars/restaurants near university dr. 103. Rent costs in town have skyrocketed. The government could cap Rental prices for certain units. 104. I just housing near campus that doesn’t cost thousands per month without including parking and utilities. I don’t get how the prices are as high as back in Austin but every place pays less. 105. Eliminate the No More than Four Ordinance. It's a legitimate burden on low-income students. 106. Affordability is definitely the biggest concern, especially among graduate students (that I've talked to) - this is mainly dealt with through multi-student households and rentals, so having units available is crucial for us, especially something close enough to campus to commute easily without driving. 107. Being able to walk to class and host groups is very important to me. 108. I've been a graduate student for 7 years and I've noticed that rental prices are decreasing yet our graduate stipends are staying the same and are below the living wage threshold in BCS. If possible, BCS government should advocate for livable wages among TAMU graduate students and staff, so that they can afford to live in the area. 109. Top building more apartment buildings that end up increasing rent everywhere. If I was not about to graduate in the next year I would be extremely concerned about finding a safe place I could afford. 110. If northgate is redeveloped, keep the first and maybe second floors of these buildings as bars. 111. I appreciate that the local leadership has continued to approve the construction of many new apartment buildings near campus. This has helped keep the cost of living down to a degree and gives students great housing options. That said, the cost of housing near campus has grown exponentially each of the last five years I have lived here. Any measures that Bryan-College Station leadership can take to keep housing costs near campus low would be hugely important to students. 112. I think student should be able to live with more than 4 non related family members. 113. My housing preferences have changed from undergrad to grad; as an undergrad, I liked living near other college students and being closer to campus. 114. Walkability and mixed use zoning are most important. 115. Rent has been steadily increasing each year and does not match wages in the area. It feels as though agencies and landlords are exploiting college-age renters by making them pay more, especially those without credit. If you do not have a stellar credit score at this age, you likely have to pay twice the price of the deposit. 116. No more than four is an abomination and produces great burden on tenants, land-lords, and the area as a whole. 117. Too expensive for something nice and safe. Page 180 of 223 132CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 118. Yes- housing prices in College Station are absolutely ridiculous, especially for the quality of housing that is available. The provision that only allows four unrelated tenants on a lease is also ridiculous, especially given the amount of five bedroom homes in college station. If we were able to have more than four people on our lease, people in my house could share bedrooms and ease renting and utility costs for all of us. 119. The four only rule is tyrannical. 120. Currently student on campus in corps, upon graduation intend to move to Bryan. 121. Biggest issue is affordability and availability. I feel as though more students should live on campus in their underclassmen years rather than jumping straight into on campus living. It provides the true college experience and teaches one how to respect the space of others. 122. One challenge I see is that the 'affordable' options are not really suitable for students as they are generally further away from both grocery stores and campus. I would love to see some densification of areas near campus and expansion of bus system(s) to get from dense housing areas to grocery stores and around points in town. Being able to walk or bike to friends' houses would make a huge difference. 123. Housing is crazy expensive for the quality that you get from most apartments and rental houses. 124. Install rent controls. 125. I wish there were more summer housing options. 126. I’m born and raised here in BCS and feel like rental housing prices are incredibly high. As someone who doesn’t live at home and pays for school and housing myself I feel there should be more affordable options around town. Anything that is semi affordable looks tore up from the floor up. It would be nice to see newer rental properties or recently renovated properties with more reasonable prices. 127. Parking situation; most apartment complexes have little parking options and hardly any visitor parking. Too many people. 128. I wish the city, property rental, agencies, and property developers would get on the same page about regulations. I don’t understand how there is a no more than 4 rule but there are streets like Dominik with 5bedroom duplexes advertised to students as rent cost/5. I think the housing problem could find some relief if cstat/bryan was more bike/walk friendly. While some areas are not a long commute from campus, it’s an extremely daunting commute on bike which deters students from choosing to live there. 129. I think we need an International House ( a lot of cities with big US universities do), since finding a place in BCS while international is a disaster (no accountability when it comes to deposit returns, extra fees for non- US residents, and generally a lot of owners take advantage of this quite unprotected group of people who have no support system or family in the US and know little about BCS upon arrival). 130. Provide different public transportation options to areas further away from campus (i.e. south College Station, etc.), like park and ride. 131. There needs to be regulated apartment prices, the price of small apartments are out of control and more than a mortgage on a $400k home bought just four years ago. 132. I think it is more important to ensure housing prices do not continue to skyrocket than developing new housing. Traffic is already such a major issue in this city and adding more apartment complexes especially is making it more and more difficult to get around the BCS area. 133. We don't need more "luxury" apartments that no one can afford. Graduate and professional student most often do not/cannot rely on their parents' money for housing. We desperately need more affordable and decent housing within the budget of TAMU graduate students. 134. I am a grad student who also works full-time and is married with no children. Finding a rental in this town for a married couple is outrageous. We do not have the capability (even though we both work at A&M full time) to afford $2,000+ in rent for two people when most of these rentals are meant for 4-5 college students to split the rent cost. We pay it all ourselves and have been very limited on rental housing options in the College Station area. 135. The rule forbidding more than 4 unrelated people living in the same house needs to be amended, as I have friends that have a 5 bed 5.5 house that was clearly built to accommodate students, and they can only have 4 leasers. This rule is gyping landlords and students. 136. We need more housing, and we NEED parking near the housing. 137. Middle housing doesn’t exist due to 5 tenant law, doesn’t make sense with projected growth. Plan mentions missing middle housing and this is the direct cause. Page 181 of 223 133CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 138. Housing for married students with no children that are full-time students and part-time workers is virtually non-existent. Many of the apartment complexes that are in campus proximity are rented by bedroom per unit versus entire units, severely limiting the options to students who make less than or equal to $2500/month. The only other option are areas that are unsafe/old in which rent ends up being more than 50% of monthly income. 139. There should be more "SAFE" affordable housing for college students. 140. I feel that housing companies are exploiting students, especially at move-out with unreasonably high charges. Some sort of an organization is needed to protect tenants (if already existing, more awareness should be raised among students). 141. Build more dense walkable mixed-use infrastructure please! And better public transit! 142. With the increasing size in student population, inflation, and increasing rent prices, it is absolutely absurd that the historic neighborhood only allows 4 students to a lease. Ghost leasing should not be a problem because it should not even exist. To have this 4-person house rule still in effect is outrageous and creates a housing crisis where property owners can continue to raise the rent even when it is already $1400/month. Not to mention, I was someone who was first on the list for a house, and for years they had offered it first come first serve, but they changed it my year to a private bidding war. Absolutely ridiculous. You want to keep costs down for students? Allow more than four to a property. 143. Texas A&M University could partner with homeowners to regulate prices and offer fair rates to students. Discounts on utilities for students living in single-family neighborhoods could be explored. 144. The "No more than four" rule. Needs to go. It forces rent up since students cannot share the rent among more tenants. 145. Housing in college station is way too expense and needs to be more affordable. 146. It costs too damn much. Rent is more than 80% my income. 147. Allowing more than four girls to be roommates. 148. New student housing that is close to campus seems to have insanely high prices that I'm not sure most students could afford. 149. I considered rescinding my acceptance to A&M because they didn't have a spot for me in the dorms. I will never forget the hell I went through trying to secure a living situation off campus. 150. Stop eroding affordable housing options for low income families in College Station. Southgate Villas seems to be the last remaining place that the families I volunteer with can live, because all the apartments and homes that used to be affordable are now student housing, because the university won’t create enough housing for the amount of students it accepts. 151. The "no more than four" law makes it very difficult for college students to legally afford houses. This promotes the building of apartments instead of houses. 152. Remove the no more than 4 law. 153. There should be more than four tenants allowed in a home. 154. Making things cheaper would make things more available. 155. Having the no more than four rule makes housing expensive when students should be able to live in houses near campus that have more than 4 bedrooms. Rule makes no sense. 156. Get rid of the no more than four rule. 157. My worry with university owned housing is the potential added costs and lack of sufficient maintenance. Which is similar to current private apartments. My family bought a house in a close neighborhood because the monthly note is the same as rent for a good apartment but I have almost guaranteed high speed wifi in my area and maintenance people only require finding a reputable company. I’ve lived in dorms and apartments where maintenance requests were ignored for weeks or months or wifi was nonexistent during crucial test hours. I look forward to seeing a solution for students that can be reliable and affordable. 158. Everything decent is just so so expensive. Would love more 1 bedroom options. 159. Encourage more townhome/rowhouse style housing over typical apartment complexes. Even better if parking and utilities are in an alley behind buildings. 160. The city should develop improved transportation infrastructure before adding much more housing. Also, more grocery markets are desperately needed. 161. I would be interested in more on campus housing options however I am not willing to pay for anything that is super expensive. Page 182 of 223 134CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 162. More accessible EV chargers in College Station. 163. The biggest concern I have with housing is the affordability of housing off campus. There isn't a lot of affordable options to be able to live on campus let alone live by yourself. Anything that is remotely "affordable" is very run down, deemed not safe, and have many cons such as utilities not being included, or not being near campus, and even being in a neighborhood deemed not safe for a college student to live in by themselves. Having to find a place to live is very difficult as a first generation student because my mom can't financially support me like other parents when it comes to housing. I have to pay my own rent and expenses by working minimum wage jobs and still being a full time student. I love College Station and the Bryan area it is just really hard to find a safe, convenient, and affordable place to live. 164. Repeal the “No more than 4” bill in the Bryan-College Station area. 165. Make it more affordable. 166. The price of rent is increase around town by several hundred dollars a month even though you pay for your own utilities and they don't make any updates to your apartment. 167. Student housing should prioritize having roadways that are safe for both pedestrians and non motorized/micromobility. 168. Agg shacks should be illegal. 169. Biggest need is a bus route close to the housing to campus. 170. Housing prices have risen quite a bit recently, I live in Aggie Station and my rent has gone from 690 to 840 in one year. 171. Energy standards for existing rental properties. We couldn't get our place above 60 degrees during the cold freeze. 172. Offer more on-campus residence halls or open registration for them later. 173. If university can have a partnership with housing and can provide affordable housing that will be great. 174. HOA’s are stupid. 175. Lower prices. 176. PARKING! Building apartment complexes is great but not in areas with no parking options. 177. There are too many dang people at this school, stop making college station over-crowded 178. Townhomes are cool! 179. College apartment housing has a serious lack of respect for the students who live there. The ownership of the property changes frequently making things change hands too often; things end up falling through the cracks. The maintenance teams are not large enough as they maintain multiple complexes and are often not even on the property for multiple days. This leads to students living without basic necessities in this climate: air conditioning and running water. I personally look forward to living in a real apartment whose management respects those who pay rent to live there. 180. Some more affordable housing options should be built in the $1600-$2000 per month for 4 people as this is affordable. 181. Stop expanding the school, build the infrastructure first. 182. End no more than 4! 183. It is too expensive for what is being offered. 184. If anything new is built, it should be built in a traditional architectural style. 185. More police supervision of apartments would be appreciated. Some of the places in town are sketchy and have crime rate and having the police roll through at night would be appreciated. 186. Housing needs to seriously consider the financial capabilities of students AND families. Many students who have to afford college on their own are significantly impacted negatively by the growing cost of rent and houses. In my opinion as a public health student, a majority of mental health problems within students stems from financial capabilities resulting from affording college and rent. 187. Don’t ruin Northgate. 188. Parking! 189. Rent it too high for college students in general. 190. The rent is exorbitant and students have to secure housing a year in advance which is ridiculous. Page 183 of 223 135CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 191. Renting from a REAL PERSON I could actually have a conversation with- NOT a rental management company employed to obfuscate & frustrate tenants- is an absolute top priority for me in the future. This would be doubly so if there were any meaningful tenant protections laws here, which unfortunately there don't seem to be. Instead, local (& state etc) laws STRONGLY favor landlords, which is expected in Texas but disappointing in a town essentially comprised of and economically powered by students. Though the biggest problem with a model like this town is the transience of most students, who will be affected by unfair housing laws here, then probably move before being able to change local laws affecting student renters. I am very concerned about the rising costs of housing. I rent from an infuriating, useless, and faceless "property management company" and even though I'm the ideal renter (quiet, on-time payments, take great care of property), I am paying 200$ more per month than when I first signed (my late 70's unit continues to deteriorate). It's very expensive to move, and companies/landlords alike will exploit tenants desire to avoid moving every time; they hold ALL the cards and I have absolutely no leverage to plead for them not to raise monthly rent (or for example, just raise it in accordance with actual inflation since they claim that's why they HAVE NO CHOICE but to raise rent... yearly housing inflation is NOT 6.3% last I checked) when I resign. I've been motivated for a long time to fight for local housing protection for renters, and moving here to witness and be a part of this system designed entirely to benefit property owners off the backs of students has made me even more progressive in this regard. 192. Get rid of the four person to a house maximum limit. The rule only hurts students living in a college town. If you are an adult living in a college neighborhood, you should understand the neighborhood you are in before choosing to live there. More students to a house improves affordability. 193. We want more than 4. 194. Not city owned. 195. I think most people want an affordable little spot for themselves that is close to campus. 196. I want to inquire regarding the “no more than four” housing rule. Is this still in-effect, if so, what kind of houses do they apply to? Does it apply to houses in a certain area of college station? Lastly, would it apply to a 5 or 6 bedroom house? 197. While the cost of living in Bryan/College Station is especially cheap compared to the rest of Texas and the rest of the United States, BCS is not exclude from the pressures of inflation, limited wage growth, and rising tuition rates. I've been living in my current housing situation for the 2nd year in a row; my rent went up by nearly 7% while I received a pay increase of only 3%. Students need affordable housing. 198. Almost all of my peers have issues with a lack of cleanliness no matter the type of housing they live in or how clean and tidy they keep their space. Almost every apartment and townhome complex I know of is known to have bug infestations of some sort and does nothing to resolve it. 199. I live in Bryan but a huge issue is access to any other public or university transport. Many international students/employees do not have access to a car. This limits where they can reside based off of transportation options alone. 200. There shouldn't be a limit on a number of people per house. 201. As a homeowner and student, I’d like to rent out a room or two in my own home and think there should be programs to better facilitate that other than posting on Face-book 202. Rent is rising everywhere ): 203. Stop letting corporations and "investors" buy family housing as financial assets here. Additionally, preventing private apartment complexes from claiming they have luxury apartments without any definitions or criteria with inspections of what that is and thus charging 2-3x more than the apartment is actually valued at should be stopped. 204. I think the city should put more effort into expanding public transportation which would include stopping by apartment complexes/neighborhoods. 205. The rental prices here are insanely expensive compared to other cities in the sur-rounding areas. College station has not even 1/3 of the entertainment available that Houston does and yet Houston prices are much more affordable. The cost of living in this city is ridiculous and takes advantage of college students. 206. Please develop the area around campus in a denser way. Campus is surrounded by large high traffic roads and the George Bush Rd side has single family homes immediately off campus. That area ought to be multi-use developments, more similar to Northgate area. College station is not a big enough town to justify urban sprawl. More walking, less driving would be nice. Better for people's health, and the option of non car transit would reduce traffic. 207. Student apartments in college station are incredibly expensive for the poor quality we get. A 4x4, 3x3, or 2x2 should not cost more than $810 do live in no matter how close it is to campus. Page 184 of 223 136CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 208. To continue to make college station/Bryan more updated and nice. 209. Build more student apartments - no reason why its a fight to the death for housing in March (when future students haven't even been able to try and secure housing yet). 210. Housing is becoming increasingly more expensive as the number of students in college station rapidly grows. With No-more-than-four, it is extremely difficult to afford any housing- even if your parents assist financially. There needs to be a cap on the amount of students. This City was not built for 75,000 students at TAMU alone, not taking into account Blinn and Rellis. 211. Renters rights education for student. 212. Just make sure no illegal immigrants are renting or buying housing. 213. There are far too many apartment complexes that are taking advantage of the young age of students and allowing them to be treated inhumanely. I have experienced management here that will completely disregard students complaints about even the most concerning issues. I would love if A&M could provide more services to assist this, especially a student rated housing site. 214. I'd love more townhomes and quadplexes near the university. 215. I like the options of living in a house and having my own space. A large backyard and good driveway make it nice. Also living in a home is nice and private. I would not like the homes to be taken over by apartments because the space a home provides is ideal. Especially with families around with kids. 216. Properties to offer more short term leases for graduating seniors. 217. Housing prices near campus for any contracts above $2000 per month per person seem unreasonable. 218. The limit of 4 people in single housing is bad. 219. It would be nice to have further development in the bus system as well as more dedicated bike lanes. 220. College station needs more low income housing for full time students who have to work to afford rent and food. 221. The price of rent for my son and I near Wolf Pen, access to Aggie Busses for us both, is about $700 per room. I have a two bedroom two bath with no amenities. Rent keep rising. I feel like I am being priced out if the "student zone" where parents typically pay rent. 222. This didn’t seem very helpful. There needs to be a cap on rental prices. They are out of control and rental properties can increase rent whenever they want and by however much they want. My pay, as a full-time teacher, could never afford an apartment on my own. A studio. That’s bonkers. 223. Get rid of no more than 4. 224. It is very difficult to find an affordable apartment in decent condition in the BCS area. I work two jobs and am a full-time student and still struggle to make rent. The dorms on campus are entirely too expensive. 225. Better maintenance, at a cheaper cost. 226. Public transportation and or sidewalks are lacking. 227. Most apartments in College Station are either quite run down or extremely expensive. 228. There are many graduate students looking for that affordable independence with-out reliance on renting a house with three other roommates. Single family homes here seem to assume that we have multiple people to split the rent with, making finding a good, affordable family home (or even a decent home for a single graduate student), difficult. 229. University living would see higher levels of enthusiasm if dorms had more living spaces revolving around common rooms. The “best” setup I have personally seen is 5 rooms. 2 Students to a room + common room that connects the 8 students, and a bath-room shared for each room. Basically a 4x4 but with two people to a room. 230. Transit is the most important factor when considering housing. If there's not a bus route nearby it makes life more complicated for many students (and heavily increases the traffic). 231. The no more than four rule is scary because I’m afraid that I will have to pay more for rent since I pay for it myself. And I’ve made friends in college and I want to be able to make memories with more of my friends. 232. The city of college station is entirely opposed to student interest by restricting high occupancy housing. So much of the culture of A&M is in the historic district and many houses are inaccessible when split between 4 people instead of 5 or 6. 233. Please abolish the No More Than 4 law. 234. End no more than four. Page 185 of 223 137CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 235. Please stop accepting so many college students. We have overcrowding and traffic. 236. Campus housing at Texas A&M is currently overly priced with respect to the quality and the size of the rooms. Plus, the school is constantly raising the rate ever since 2019 when I got here. I don't feel like the on-campus apartment is the comfortable place for students except the proximity. Campus apartment has become too much marketized. It should be fixed cost so that it is affordable to students. 237. More affordable housing would be great. 238. By providing the ability for developers to build property with more units that allows for prices to decrease as the rental market is flooded with supply. By limiting where renters can go or the amount of renters (such as limiting number of non-related renters) it hurts renting. More areas around the already big apartment towers should be made into similar designs, this would allow for max rental units with minimal impact on remaining parts of town. Commercial areas that aren't occupied should also be converted into residential zones to allow for more properties to be made. I would also think that many parts of south college station are under utilized due to construction and distance from campus, I would be interested in moving that way if there was some method of cheap high speed transit that went near campus (train). 239. City of College Station needs to more heavily enforce their 4 roommate/house rule. I know many people who are benefitting illegally from housing more people than on their lease and adding more than 4 roommates into a space. 240. I think the city of college station/bryan needs to change the law on 5 girls in 1 house. It is inconvenient and provides less housing opportunities for women who need more roommates for more affordability. 241. Dropping the "no more than 4" rule would be the most helpful thing the city can do for college students searching for affordable housing. 242. Housing seems to be perfect in college station compared to many other college towns in US. 243. End the 4 person to a dwelling rule. It is nothing short of tyranny and government overreach. 244. More multi-unit to keep students close to campus and reduce rush hour traffic. 245. Please reduce the utilities cost and need a grocery store in Northgate. 246. There are not enough housing options in walking distance to campus that are non-luxury/affordable. 247. Modernity of housing is very important to me. 248. Make rent more affordable everywhere its too expensive for students, and not only for the really bad run down apartments but for the nicer ones too! update more run down living spaces instead of throwing money into new complexes. 249. Raising taxes is causing my landlord to raise my rent. 250. I think that housing should be very much more affordable. As a student who did not receive any financial aid, it is hard for my parents to pay my tuition and hard for them to make ends meet just because of me. University housing is very expensive therefore it should be noted that housing around campus and student housing should be much more affordable. I come from Lubbock, TX. Lubbock is twice the size of College Station, yet housing around is much more affordable for students and single families. 251. More single family homes that are affordable. So often students get stuck in a noisy apartment. We need a quiet place to study and SO many of us have pets in college station. We deserve a good home that we can live and thrive in. 252. The university should provide subsidy for student housing rentals. 253. As a renter, I’m curious about if the apartment can show us the rent increase rate annually. 254. There should be more affordable housing for all sorts of students, not just those who are able to live with a group of friends. Some need a one bedroom and those are super pricey and or the condition of the space does not warrant the price. 255. Rent should be lower for students. 256. On campus housing needs to be cheaper and easier to apply for. There needs to be more security on and off campus to avoid incidences. Frat houses need to be away from residences because of noise and trash. 257. The increase in rent is scaring me as I will soon not being able to stay were I currently am. 258. More mixed zoning available would fix the housing problem. As well as eliminating minimum parking mandates. 259. No more than 4 is a restrictive policy and disrupts the lives of many students. 260. We need to take away the ban of not allowing 5 or more non family members for live in a house together. This is a college campus and people need a place to live. Page 186 of 223 138CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 261. There are virtually ZERO places for students with children/families. 262. Rent shouldn’t be over 1000 dollars. It’s college station texas, not new york city. 263. Shelter is an essential need and therefore an accessibility requirement for all students, faculty and staff. a hands-off approach to housing on the university’s behalf is inequitable and causes low income students to suffer. 264. I think roommates should be at the discretion of the owner of the house. Not limited or regulated by an exterior entity. Housing is expensive as is, and finding people to reduce the cost of living should be available to everyone. 265. The massive 5bed/5bath new builds are probably great for undergraduates (and the landlords), but the replacement of more reasonably sized single-family-homes makes it increasingly difficult for graduate/professional students with families to find affordable, appropriate housing that's relatively near campus; we can't afford (to rent or buy) a lot of the newer subdivisions and don't want to live in apartment complexes with a bunch of undergraduate students either, especially those of us with pets and children. 266. I am really excited to live in a house next year and hopefully for the next few years. I do not want to live in an apartment or dorm or anything like that. I would like to have a place that is easy to invite people over to and I value that a lot. 267. Too many high priced private student housing complexes that charged around $1,000 a bedroom space in a 4x4 unit (Rev, Auto, Aspire) and the older ones trend to charge just below them (Northpoint Crossing, The Rise, The Standard) so when new private student housing properties open up with high rates for being new, the older properties also continue to raise rates. 268. The 4 person lease rule is crazy. 269. Graduate student specific housing offered by the university would be a helpful option. 270. Get rid of “no more than 4” it’s an absurd rule that needs to be done with. 271. More than four students should be allowed to live in single-family residences or townhomes. Rent has become very unaffordable in College Station and often times still too expensive even when split between 4 students. 272. I just want rent to be cheaper. 273. We like the zoning laws that put businesses on the first floor and apartments above. 274. Housing with included garages, that are big enough to actually fit the number of vehicles expected (i.e. a 2 car garage should fit 2 cars and still close door and get in and out of vehicles). 275. I am tired of these slum lords taking advantage of college student who don’t know better. They charge an exorbitant amount of money for apartments that are barely livable, it take them 6 months to make a simple fix (if they even get around to it). The city needs to do more to protect students from these people. And don't get me started on Optimum/SuddenLink. 276. The housing in college station has gotten bad. It's either a torn up house that is within a normal budget or a houses/apartments that way to expensive because they were newly built. There is not enough middle ground for students who support themselves to afford housing, groceries, and utilities all by themselves while feeling secured in the place you're renting. 277. As housing prices soar, I wonder why competitive options are not more available. The general opinion of those I've spoken with is that nobody lives where they want - rather, they search for the "least terrible" option. If employers in the city can't be coaxed into increasing wages, then housing companies need to focus less on buying more land, otherwise housing will continue to bleed people dry and drive them away from college station. I know of 6 people that have moved in with their parents or left the state entirely explicitly because of housing prices. 278. Many current apartments private and university affiliated, engage in predatory and often illegal practices. 279. I suggest the city of College Station should stick to what Texas seems to do better than a lot of other states: allow the building of housing units (houses, apartments, etc.) as much as possible (within reason) which results in cheaper housing leaving more people with a higher disposable income. 280. We need more affordable housing that isn’t student living. I've lived here my whole life and apartments are being targeted more and more towards students so if you don’t want to live with roommates, you are out of luck. 281. College station housing should not be rivaling Austin, Texas pricing. Over a grand a person in a 6bd 6ba apartment in college station is criminal and honestly is just taking advantage of college students. My rent in just a one year span jumped 30% pricing me out. Page 187 of 223 139CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 282. I would like to have flexible lease terms to accommodate the transient nature of college life. Also, some green initiatives, e.g., recycling in all apartment complexes. 283. Amending the bill that doesn't allow more than 4 residents (that are not related) sharing a home. 284. Parking is another important factor I consider when finding housing. 285. I think the trend we will see over the next few decades is the densification of living. We need mazed zoning which allow for small groceries, pharmacies, bakeries, butchers restaurant within walking/cycling/bus from residential area. Housing is no longer accessible to the majority of people under 40. Cars are more expensive than ever, and more people are dying from car related fatalities than ever. Building a robust public transit system where necessary amenities are within walking distance would reduce obesity rates, drunk driving fatalities and disease from environmental pollution which will save a lot of money, so from a financial perspective, this is the only reasonable choice. 286. 4 per house may be limiting student housing options. 287. Make it more affordable and end housing requirements. 288. The max 4 person per dwelling rule is so stupid. 289. The bill introduced last year barring more than 4 unrelated students from residing in a single family home together placed significant burden on many students who were forced to find new housing that often times was not as affordable. 290. Let students live with as many people as they want! 291. It’s way too expensive. 292. The house rent is too high to afford in college station now. for a graduate student, specially a female with kids (single mother) it is overwhelming. 293. Ghost tenants shouldn’t be punished. 294. Rents in BCS have gone up significantly. As an international student with a very limited income, it has become unbearable for me to handle the rent and utility cost. If you’re able, please do something a ok this. 295. No more than 4 makes college housing so much more difficult and is not fair to students. 296. I wish there were more options for just my dog and I- a single occupant with a small yard for. 297. The ability to walk and use transit to get to businesses, the university, and other desirable areas makes housing much better. 298. Get rid of the ordinance banning more than four residents to a house. It only furthers wealth inequality, and apartment complexes have dramatically raised rates since this ordinance has been put in place. 299. Prices are going up with properties getting worse and worse. Please consider new buildings from builders who actually take time to create good housing! 300. I hate the cap on the number of non-familial renters living in the same house/unit. Limiting rentals to only 4 unrelated rentals is frustrating. 301. Too much housing owned by private companies taking advantage of college students in Bryan/College Station. 302. 4200 for a dorm is too much. 303. The barrier that the property managements do not allow a family of 2 adult with 3 kids in 2 bed apartments are a big program that should be addressed. There is need for down payment grant assistant program for first time home buyers with lower income. 304. I know multiple people who cannot afford to rent in houses that abide by the "No more than four" rule and have to break it in order to afford rent. 305. I believe there is too much demand for too little apt. near the university and prices are out of control. 306. I just wish housing was more affordable. I currently pay $600 for a single bedroom, renting both bedrooms in my unit ($1200) costs the same or less than a studio or 1bd/1bth in most complexes. After graduation, I don't believe I will be able to move out to even a studio smaller than my unit because I will not be able to afford it 307. Provide assistance for international students with housing options when they are coming for the first time. 308. It’s just so pricey even terrible quality apartments are expensive. 309. Housing is too expensive in College Station. 310. Stop accepting more students than the university can handle. 311. Your utilities are a ripoff. Page 188 of 223 140CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 312. Get rid of the dumb no more than 5 to a house rule. 313. Enable more cheaper and affordable housing. 314. Need more dense housing close to campus. 315. Being able to bike to campus/work is a game changer for me. It's cheaper, and better for my physical/mental health than driving. 316. Rent control, prices are skyrocketing. 317. Wish they stopped increasing the rent by $50 each lease without upgrading anything. 318. Rent for college apartments are getting way too expensive. 319. The 3+ me rule excludes affordable housing for many students who fall in the middle class. 320. Make rent cheaper for close to campus apartments. 321. Rent in college station has been increasing, but the quality and value of the properties keeps diminishing. How do you expect us student to afford to live here? 322. When looking for a 1 bedroom apartment I found it hard to find a non-rundown complex that was affordable. I found that most places are older and affordable or new and super expensive. I wish there were more options that were newer or updated and affordable. 323. When I lived in a house with other students, the current law only allowing 4 unrelated students to live in one place made it incredibly hard to find housing, even further, find affordable housing. The City needs to consider that with the expanding student population and limited affordable housing, without doing so will only further students living in large groups. 324. Lots of roaches here in college station. 325. I do think its a good idea to improve the housing situation for students in the area for all of the local universities that provide a huge benefit to the College Station economy. Unfortunately, the infrastructure does not provide this with an easy task. Much of the infrastructure focuses primarily on the access for cars to travel and less for pedestrian and other commute types (like bike and scooter). Many roads are unsafe for students to commute to work as much of the time the roadway is the only method of travel. I hope this helps! 326. Allow more than 4 people. 327. The corps dorms are ridiculously overpriced for the space, amenities, and quality of the dorms. It is ridiculous that we have no other options given the state of the quad. 328. No. 329. As the prices of rent rises it is not feasible for only 4 student to rent a home and it becomes to expensive and out of reach for many students. 330. The higher the rent in the newly built high rises, the higher other apartments think they can charge. My last apartment was updated in the 60s, had faulty electrical, and cocroach problems. The owner wanted to increase my rent to 850 per month while there was still cocroach feces in the kitchen cupboards. There is nothing here demanding clean standards and properties will charge the same prices as lavish updated/modern options. 331. There should be more affordable options for students with non student family members such as those with partners they are not married to, or who may be caretakers for a loved one. 332. Programs that help with rental assistance for families. 333. Need more bus routes 334. I think this survey misses the key issue that faces college station today regarding housing. The infrastructure network in this town is awful, and is unable to handle the amount of people currently living here. Investments in public transit, protected bike lanes, and walkable communities should be a priority. Why is there no grocery store on campus or in Northgate? When looking to the future, housing should be built with non-car-dependency in mind. 335. Stop raising the rates in every apartment and house in college station. Paying for college and unsafe and horrible living conditions is not right. Do better, stop screwing college students over and sacrificing their safety because they cannot afford “nicer” housing. 336. People only have certain real requirements of living safety and security, a space that is their own. 337. Possibly provide education/assistance with the leasing process. Most leasing groups here in college station take advantage of students and try to sneak around leasing agreements and up prices. Page 189 of 223 141CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 338. No more than four needs to be removed. 339. Rent is single-handedly killing students financially. There is no reason rent should go up if these apartments are outdated, not being properly cleaned or cared for, or unsafe. There are predatory practices here in College Station. 340. University owned housing is incredibly undesirable due to the price so much could be improved with city rent control. 341. Build more high rise apartments and buildings densely and zone for things like grocery stores and other amenities. Also make college station in general more walkable by redirecting traffic on university blvd. 342. Housing is ridiculously expensive. I am an older, single student so staying with students 15+ years younger than me is not an option. Single housing is a MUST. 343. The no more than four rule should be overturned. It is outdated and unfair. 344. I think the best option for new student housing would be apartments that are within walking distance of affordable grocery stores and are located on the campus bus routes with more focus on quality and affordability but without focus on extraneous amenities like gyms and pools. 345. No more rule of 4 involving students in the same house. 346. The skyrocketing prices for renting places and utilities are totally draining our wallets !!! 347. End no more than four. 348. Pet friendly. 349. You should be able to live with 4 other people that are t related to you. 350. Living in a college student only area helps promote community & positive mental health. Make housing where it’s easier for us to make friends in common spaces. 351. Current housing is too expensive. 352. Being limited to only 3 roommates is ridiculous and makes housing more difficult. 353. I support limiting number of adults living in a single residence. Too often, there is no room for emergency vehicles to go down the street because there are so many cars parked in the street. Homes must have parking for the vehicles living at that home and parking should not be allowed when streets are too narrow for traffic to flow. 354. I wish the bike lanes were safer and more noticeable, especially at night. I think a primary bus lane/moped/motorcycle lane should be used as a barrier to protect the bikers from average car drivers. 355. Make it so 5 people can live together! 356. Private rental apartments are increasing the rent drastically, while the quality of service (maintenance, products, etc.) are same or degrade. Accessibility to campus by multiple bus routes is one of the driving factors for students while choosing housing. 357. Ensuring more safety aongst student housing and reducing the cross housing between residents and students of cstat/bryan. 358. Get rid of the predatory property managers. Almost all the apartments in B/CS are ran by predators who prey on young college students that don’t know any better and waste their limited funds on poorly kept apartments and duplexes and high rental rates. You need to impose serious restrictions on these property companies to cap rates and prevent them from taking advantage of students and young people. Even as a graduate student, it’s extremely difficult to find housing in this area that does not have a terrible landlord/property manager. Something needs to change because it is abhorrent what these property owners and managers are doing. 359. Just want to live somewhere affordable and safe. I don't need new things, 4 walls a roof, don't be modly or roachy, no crime. 360. The rent jumps significantly from year to year and the timing in which you must find a lease before it becomes unaffordable is ridiculous. This is especially unfair for transfer and international students. Most of the on campus housing is taken by freshman, meaning everyone else must find housing off campus. As a student at Texas A&M you are literally trapped in an environment that takes advantage of your needs. 361. There is not enough housing to meet the demands of students, but the housing that does get built is charging higher and higher rates-some of these apartments are charging the same rates my sister pays in downtown Austin, which seems excessive. Page 190 of 223 142CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 362. Why would you take the option of living in a single family dwelling away from students? Drop the 5 person law and leave us alone! 363. The law that says no more than 4 people can be on a lease is insane. 364. The no more than four evidence is the most insane thing to exist in a college town and is the main cause of all of my housing issues. This needs to be done away with. 365. Rent needs to be affordable compared to the average salary of a graduate student. Everywhere is too expensive to afford. 366. As an architecture student studying sustainability, what should be considered is the preservation of college stations historic elements while also meeting the growing need for housing. This means updating old homes instead of tearing them down. Adaptive-reuse of space to maintain the cultural value while also accommodating a population that is predicted to continue growing. 367. Need more modern housing, and more housing that has less bedrooms (not 5-7 bedroom houses). 368. I believe that the city of college station should allow more dense infill by the university. Having single family homes across the street from one of the biggest universities in the country is not the best use of valuable land that could be put to better use. For me personally, being in walking or biking distance of the university is extremely important, and all of that dense development being forced into one neighborhood (Northgate) makes the quantity of those type of prime location apartments limited. This could also have the effect on reducing traffic near the university, as less students would need to drive in order to get to campus. 369. There should be more options that are within a college students' reasonable budget. My roommates and I had a budget of $600/month for each of us and we only found 2 apartments complexes that are decent and within that price range. 370. I think if a house has a certain number of bedrooms then at least that many people should be allowed to live there. It does not make sense to have a 5 bedroom home that only 4 people can live in because of the me +3 rule. 371. There needs to be more maintenance workers for all of the housing. 372. College Station is a college town. I know Bryan and college station residents complain about so many students but I makes no sense to me when they choose to live in/near a college town. That’s going to happen. I think a revamp needs to happen in the actual neighborhoods and not focus on extremely expensive high rise buildings. They’re destroying the love for historic college station along with the new business developments taking out historical businesses such as Hurricane Harry’s. Fix Post Oak Mall first and make it safe for female students. I’ve been walked to my car multiple times because someone was following me throughout the mall and to my car. 373. There needs to be some regulation on the landlords because I have had a rent increase without any change in quality of my residence. 374. The pricing has gotten out of hand essentially near north gate I think that there should be some price limits because over $2000 a month for a 1x1 is insane. 375. New student houses, and homes in general need to be built that are affordable. There is already too many expensive houses that no one wants to live in. 376. The four person limit in dwellings is ridiculous and inconvenient for a college town. 377. If housing has for than 4 bedrooms than they should let people fill the bedroom. 378. The Legacy Point project must be stopped or college station will lose all of the things that make it a place where students want to come. 379. Housing should be more pet friendly, I’m personally a student 1300 miles away from my family and childhood friends and my two dogs are my only sense of security and safety. 380. Allow 5 unrelated to live together. 381. Many students I know do not have a car, which can be a major issue for the lifestyle in College Station. The campus buses are not always enough and do not run frequently after 8pm which is not reasonable for someone without a car. I would encourage looking at the adjacent areas and services to try and find something with a closeness to necessary goods and activities. 382. I prefer having secure basics (working A/C, laundry, appliances) than anything fancy ("Smart" homes or TVs in each room are not a draw). Page 191 of 223 143CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 383. The “no more than four” rule does more harm than good. Students live with more than 4 people in a private home because the rent is more affordable. Having that rule doesn’t do anything but make it more difficult for students to find affordable housing. 384. Let people have as many people in their house as there are bedrooms. You are not God; you work in local government. Your salary is paid by the people. Stay out of our business and let us decide our own housing arrangements. I will never understand how not allowing more than 4 makes any sense. Serve the people, stop creating rules when there is no need for them in the first place. I could go on for hours, but you probably understand what I’m getting at. 385. The cost of on campus living or university owned housing has spiked and become unaffordable. 386. This town has gotten absolutely ridiculous for rent. I had to find a place for one semester because I was in internship and every option was close to $1,000. 387. Hard to find affordable one bedroom private apartments. Much more affordable when there are roommates. Although some of the rent by room, not by unit, even with roommates is still pretty steep in price. On campus housing is a lot more expensive than private apartments if you look at the monthly average and include that you can't live there year round. 388. Texas A&M should provide affordable housing for graduate students like other research universities do. The campus owned Gardens apartment is crazily expensive, which should be at least 50% cheaper to control the rental market in College Station. 389. Not enough affordable housing. 390. Take away no more than four. 391. If rent and expenses are increasing, also consider increasing wages in order for net living to be sustainable. 392. Foreign students friendly is important. 393. Private rental property rates keep rising because “if they’ll pay that price next door then they’d pay that price here.” 394. Students don't need luxury housing. they need affordable housing. 395. There is no substantial improvement in the conditions of the apartment but rent increases exponentially every year with no explanation or limit. Also, a lot of housing has no walkable space even within the complex. Some form of control over how much rent can increase at once, and some accommodation to walk inside the apartment is required. 396. In addition to "safety" the walker/bicyclist friendly nature of the area. Areas that are cheaper tend to not have well lit roads and sidewalks. Maybe you can match these data to the data being collected by the transport department in their GIS survey. 397. Living in college station has been extremely stressful. Not having cheap options and requiring a parent cosigner was challenging. Every single apartment here requires parents to cosign but what about students whose parents cannot cosign for them? This was my situation, and I went through unnecessary stress and ended up in a situation where 100% of my monthly stipend went to rent. Making 3x the amount of rent was the option I had to go with but this put me in a horrible place financially. 398. Need to density around campus (multifamily -apartments, townhomes, etc.). Allow duplexes in ALL suburban zoned neighborhoods minimum, consider eliminating single-family zoning. Protected bicycle lanes on major roads. Bus shelters at bus stops. 399. Don’t make college even more inaccessible than it already is! Get rid of the “no more than four” policy and allow students to have affordable housing. 400. Corps dorms need to be cheaper someone went through the math and found we are paying around $9/sqft a month which is ridiculous. I just went on zillow and looked at New York the first apartment I clicked on overlooks central park, is over twice the size of my dorm and costs $7/sqft. 401. Get rid of no more than 4!!!!! 402. Get rid of no more than 4. More density. More pedestrian infrastructure from complexes to campus. 403. Better management. Currently have had several tickets docked for repair to back yard deck that has loose boards and screws that aren't all the way in. Not allowed to do repair work ourselves. 404. Get rid of no more than 4. 405. Me plus 3 makes an already expensive housing situation in a&m more expensive and harms students. Page 192 of 223 144CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 406. College Station is a great college town to live in. I would love off campus, but am a meme we of the Corps of Cadets and cannot. 407. The ordinance of "The occupancy of a typical dwelling unit in College Station is limited to not more than four (4) unrelated persons." is silly. It artificially reduces the housing availability for students and makes the housing search more difficult. We were only able to rent a house with four people because of it. 408. I think reducing the cost for rental property owners (i.e. property taxes, or other business related cost imposed by government regulation) for student housing is the best way to reduce cost of rent for students. 409. No more No More Than Four. 410. Work needs to be done to make more efficient use of housing space (e.g. increasing the number of students that existing infrastructure can house) so that students do not keep getting pushed further from campus while keeping rent manageable. 411. The no more than 4 rule is making housing that was built for students less accessible to them. It is raising the price of rentals, instead of financially burdening or punishing companies owners as they build 5 person houses for college students, it fines the students themselves, that cannot afford those houses (located around other students and near campus) unless they fill all bedrooms (because 5 bedroom houses have higher rental prices than 4 bedroom ones). The students, who are already burdened financially in college, should not be punished for a problem they did not create. Stop new 5 bedroom houses from being built instead, & also make reasonable rental prices a priority for students. These people make up a huge population of college station, and should not be ignored or not prioritized simply because of their age. 412. I feel like you could change the number of students in one dwelling from 4 to 5. 413. Making it 4 to a home will not only make rent prices higher than they already are but, with make housing even harder to find as it is already fairly scarce while the university proceeds to accept more and more students every year. I work for the residential life department for TAMU and know First hand that there already isn’t enough rooms on campus for students as is. It’s idiotic that they are trying to limit when there isn’t a problem at hand. How about instead of worrying about this you fix Harvey Mitchell and be done with it. ITS BEEN YEARS. 414. The No More Than Four rule makes it extremely difficult for students to afford off campus private homes, or fill houses with 5 or more bedrooms. This is emphasized in neighborhoods with predominantly students that are close to campus. 415. It’s ridiculous to have housing options limited to 4 people. Most houses have more than 4 bedrooms in historic district and even those with 4 bedrooms require more than 4 students to live in them to make the rent affordable to students. 416. I think more than 4 non-related students should be able to live in a house together. 417. I would prefer it if more roofed parking was available. 418. Just build some decent units and the rental market becomes more rational. Right now it seems like tenants are not satisfied until they withdraw the very last cent in your bank account. 419. Demand that apartment management companies abolish their registration fees and other hidden charges, such as mandatory monthly packages, which are nothing short of a scam. It is imperative that these exploitative practices be brought to an end immediately. 420. Stop scamming college students. 421. I think that housing is such a big issue in both Bryan and College Station right now. My apartment complex just increased their rent prices by over a 100 a month. The did this because it is a trend from every other apartment complex in the area to increase prices. They know that college students need to live somewhere, so they will try to take advantage of them through this. Even when a complex is actually affordable, it may not be easy to get onto campus. One factor that is the same across all apartment complex's is that they are all very low quality compared to the prices they make students pay. I think that if we are going to be paying as much as we are, the quality should at least be up to the same standard. 422. Build more housing new campus and more transit connections - this town is absolutely awful for traffic from everyone driving their cars to campus. 423. Limiting residents to four a house prevents valuable housing space from being utilized and pushes more unnecessary development. Many of the current apartment buildings being thrown up are of cheap quality. 424. More options below $1000 a month within walking distance to campus. It should be cheaper to live off campus than on but in many cases it is not right now unless you have 3 or more roommates. Page 193 of 223 145CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 425. College Station/Bryan has exploded in population within the last ten years. The infrastructure is simply not holding up. Traffic is consistently awful and poorly managed. Same with parking. The housing market is so competitive that even extremely worn down apartments with cheap management and predatory landlords cost significantly more than they should. Unless more affordable housing is built or the number of admitted students is reduced, a housing crisis seems probable. 426. The northgate apartment buildings are collectively raising rates while decreasing the standard of living. It’s become much more difficult to get good maintenance service when things break, and the new management at Lark Northgate is more than okay with lying to residents and the public about the conditions of the building. 427. If rent could be lowered in the Northgate Area, that would be greatly appreciated. 428. Make housing cheaper and better pest control and standards. 429. There should be no rule regarding maximum number or residents in a house. This is an egregious infringement on property rights. 430. I have to live on campus because I’m in the corps. I’d love for more affordable housing or assistance with these costs. 431. Rent is just too high. It takes up over 90% of my graduate stipend which leaves barely $140 a month for groceries and gas to drive to work. 432. The prices of housing near campus (especially north gate) are just becoming crazy. 433. The increase of rent every single year. A unit starts of as affordable and then quickly becomes unaffordable. Leases tend to be strictly one year when in our graduation year sometimes we only need either a semester or half a years worth. 434. No more than 4 is ruining the safety and affordability of housing. 435. Take away the 4 roommates or less rule. unrealistic and is hurting students! people are moving to Bryan to have more than 4 roommates. Support us as students please! and stop making it impossible to live here. 436. I think a big part of housing for me is the price. Price was the biggest consideration for me when choosing where to live after living in the on campus dorms. On campus housing is much too expensive. I also wanted to have my own bedroom. I live in a spot close to campus and right by a bus stop which is also a plus. 437. It would help if more than 4 students could live in a house together. When you can have more people in a house, then rent is cheaper. 438. The no more than 4 rule is drowning students and bolstering the market unfairly! 439. The no more than 4 rule is absurd! We are college students at the end of the day and want affordable housing options, this means lower rent (since our rent is astronomically high compared to other areas) and getting rid of the insane ruling of having no more than 4 residents in a household! 440. I think there's a limit of 4 students/house that a lot of landlords don't follow, and if they get in trouble the students are the ones who get fined even though it was more the landlord! I'm not 100% sure though as I've never experienced this. 441. Houses near campus should allow 6-8 student renters. 442. Rent stabilized 1 bedroom that is under 1k. 443. 4 to a unit is a stupid rule please get rid of it. 444. The rental prices in this area are being gouged by owners and students are being taken advantage of in the current state. 445. Housing near campus should be more affordable than being close to $1000 a semester. 446. Good management is also something that is important to me. 447. Rent is too expensive in College Station. 448. As a struggling college student, the rent is way too high. I cannot afford to live in a convenient location right now. 449. Don’t let them turn historic district into century square. One of the worst things you could do to a neighborhood and the culture of the student life. Page 194 of 223 146CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 450. The college station rule of unrelated tenants is driving rent through the roof. Many of my peers would happily share a 5 bedroom 3000 square foot house with ease. I can understand not having more than 2 per bedroom, but for university housing to be allowed to store students like sardines in a 130 sq foot room is ironic because the city is fighting letting students do that within a half mile of campus because the student would save thousands of dollars per year. 451. Higher density housing centrally located to campus would be good for many students. 452. There should be more tamu bus routes that go into Bryan. 453. No more than four hurts students and makes housing more expensive. 454. Stop letting residents bully and harass students who live close to campus. 455. LOWER RENT!! Better Maintenance service and close proximity to TAMU. 456. Students with children are at a double disadvantage, we can pile inro a regular house with 5 of our friend, but we don’t have the income for a home near the CS schools. 457. Get rid of the me plus 3 rule. 458. Texas A&M has a lot of students, and those students need affordable places to live. Students should not have to compromise health and safety to achieve affordability. 459. Get rid of the 4 tenets to a house rule, it benefits nobody. Page 195 of 223 147CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN EMPLOYERSURVEY Hotel, Hospitality Industry Restaurant or bar Retail store or service provider Other tourism or recreation business Healthcare or health services provider Construction business Manufacturer Business and Professional Services:ﬁnance, insurance, IT, engineering, marketing, etc. Government, public sector Non-proﬁt organization Other 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answered: 53 Skipped: 0 Q1 - Select the establishment type that most closely describes your business or entity Page 196 of 223 148CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Hotel, Hospitality Industry 5.66%3 Restaurant or bar 9.43%5 Retail store or service provider 13.21%7 Other tourism or recreation business 1.89%1 Healthcare or health services provider 5.66%3 Construction business 7.55%4 Manufacturer 0.00%0 Business and Professional Services: finance, insurance, IT, engineering, marketing, etc.26.42%14 Government, public sector 3.77%2 Non-profit organization 9.43%5 Other (please specify)16.98%9 TOTAL 53 Page 197 of 223 149CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q2 - In what zip code is your business or organization located? Answered: 53 Skipped: 0 Q3 - How many employees (full and part time) does your business or organization employ? Answered: 53 Skipped: 0 Q4 - Considering your 2023 workers, please indicate the approximate percentage that lived in each of the following locations during the time they were employed: Answered: 53 Skipped: 0 ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES College Station 98.11%52 Outside College Station but within Brazos County 88.68%47 Outside Brazos County 67.92%36 Answered: 53 Skipped: 0 Yes No Unsure 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Page 198 of 223 150CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q5 - Do your employees have problems finding affordable housing? ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes 69.81%37 No 20.75%11 Unsure 9.43%5 TOTAL 53 Page 199 of 223 151CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q6 - Was housing affordability or availability a factor in losing one or more employees? ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes 24.53%13 No 49.06%26 I don't know 26.42%14 TOTAL 53 Q7 - Between 2020 – 2023, were you unable to hire one or more employee applicants largely because of housing issues? ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes 26.42%14 No 54.72%29 I don't know 18.87%10 TOTAL 53 Answered: 53 Skipped: 0 Yes No I don’t know 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answered: 53 Skipped: 0 Yes No I don’t know 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Page 200 of 223 152CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q8 - To what extent, if any, do you feel the issue of housing has impacted your business/organization’s efforts to recruit and retain staff? ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES A. A major impact 15.09%8 B. A moderate impact 26.42%14 C. A minor impact 24.53%13 D. No impact at all 28.30%15 E. Don’t know/Not relevant 5.66%3 TOTAL 53 Answered: 53 Skipped: 0 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% A. A major impact B. A moderate impact C. A minor impact D. No impact at all E. Don’t know/Not relevant Page 201 of 223 153CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Answered: 53 Skipped: 0 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Couldn’t ﬁnd aordable housing Couldn’t ﬁnd anything they likedthat was available to purchase Couldn’t ﬁnd housing to meetthe needs of their family Were renting butlandlord is now selling Were renting but owner is convertingdwelling into a short term rental None I don’t know/not relevant Other Q9 - What housing issues have your candidates or employees encountered? Please check all that apply. ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Couldn’t find affordable housing 58.49%31 Couldn’t find anything they liked that was available to purchase 20.75%11 Couldn’t find housing to meet the needs of their family 22.64%12 Were renting but landlord is now selling 16.98%9 Were renting but owner is converting dwelling into a short term rental 1.89%1 None 18.87%10 I don’t know / not relevant 9.43%5 Other (please specify)11.32%6 TOTAL 53 Page 202 of 223 154CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q10 - If your employees are impacted by difficulties finding housing, please select the appropriate boxes below to indicate the salary levels that are impacted. Select all that apply. Answered: 53 Skipped: 0 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% My employees were not impactedby diculties ﬁnding housing Less than $25,000 $25,000 to $40,000 $40,000 to $55,000 $55,000 to $70,000 $70,000 to $85,000 $85,000 to $100,000 $100,000 to $125,000 $125,000 to $175,000 175,000 to $225,000 225,000 or more I know they had a problem,but I don’t know the approximate amount Page 203 of 223 155CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES My employees were not impacted by difficulties finding housing 15.09%8 Less than $25,000 33.96%18 $25,000 to $40,000 47.17%25 $40,000 to $55,000 43.40%23 $55,000 to $70,000 24.53%13 $70,000 to $85,000 11.32%6 $85,000 to $100,000 1.89%1 $100,000 to $125,000 1.89%1 $125,000 to $175,000 0.00%0 175,000 to $225,000 0.00%0 225,000 or more 0.00%0 I know they had a problem, but I don’t know the approximate amount 13.21%7 TOTAL 53 Page 204 of 223 156CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q11 - What level of priority do you place the housing shortage/affordability issue in comparison with the many other concerns you face as an owner/employer? ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Top priority 3.77%2 Top three priorities 26.42%14 Mid-range priority 33.96%18 Bottom of my priorities 20.75%11 It is not on my priority list as the issue feels too big to tackle 5.66%3 I don’t consider housing an issue 9.43%5 TOTAL 53 Answered: 53 Skipped: 0 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Top priority Top three priorities Mid-range priority Bottom of my priorities It is not on my priority list asthe issue feels too big to tackle I don’t consider housing an issue Page 205 of 223 157CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q12 - As an employer, do you have ideas for creating workforce housing (housing for working households) (even if you are unsure how to implement)? ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes 0.00%0 No 69.81%37 Yes (please specify)30.19%16 TOTAL 53 Answered: 53 Skipped: 0 Yes No Yes (please specify) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Page 206 of 223 158CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q13 - As an employer, have you considered or do you already provide any of the following for your workforce? Free Housing Moving Allowance Housing Supplements FREE HOUSING MOVING ALLOWANCE HOUSING SUPPLEMENTS TOTAL RESPONDENTS Already Provide 0.00% 0 100.00% 9 11.11% 1 9 Have Considered Providing 13.33% 2 73.33% 11 33.33% 5 15 I am not Interested in Providing 97.62% 41 71.43% 30 88.10% 37 42 Answered: 53 Skipped: 0 Already Provide Have Considered Providing I am not Interested inProviding 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Page 207 of 223 159CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Q14 - Select the types of housing that you think are needed in the area to better accommodate your employees. Select up to three. ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES A. Housing that is currently available meets the needs of my employees 19.23%10 B. Single family houses to rent 59.62%31 C. Single family houses to buy 69.23%36 D. Townhouses and condos to rent 38.46%20 E. Townhouses and condos to buy 28.85%15 F. Apartments to rent 34.62%18 G. Dormitory style, short term seasonal worker housing 5.77%3 TOTAL 52 Q15 - Is there anything else you would like us to know about how housing issues affect your business/organization? Answered: 26 Skipped: 27 Answered: 52 Skipped: 1 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% A. Housing that is currently availablemeets the needs of my employees B. Single family houses to rent C. Single family houses to buy D. Townhouses and condos to rent E. Townhouses and condos to buy F. Apartments to rent G. Dormitory style, short termseasonal worker housing Page 208 of 223 160CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS AND RESPONSES Employer Survey Responses to the Question “Is there anything else you would like us to know about how housing issues affect your business/organization?” 14 respondents gave an answer to the question “Is there anything else you would like us to know about how housing issues affect your business/organization?” (responses like “no” or “none” were removed and not included). 1. This seems like bs to me. 2. My employees are not unhappy living outside of College Station even though they frequently work in College Station. For the much lower prices for the places they live outside of Brazos county, they have much more land or bigger lots, less taxes, and feel safe. None of them express a desire to live in this town because their options here are renting instead of owning, spending so much more that they are priced out, or living amongst crime in a high density area. They have a better quality of life than College Station cares to provide. Page 209 of 223 161CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 3. House rentals to college students are not overseen by HOAs. HOAs contact the owners only, not the tenants. College students are unaware of HOA rules and do not take into account the other non- college student renters in the neighborhood. 4. The increase in prices, taxes and interest rates have added financial burden to most over the past few years. 5. Get regulation out of the way. Stop passing rules limiting who can live where and let the market determine what is needed. 6. Rent is still very high despite what I thought is an over saturation in multi until dwellings in B/CS? 7. No different than a larger city which expands out into the suburbs, the "inner city areas" start to decline. while we have the university which provides great value, we are still experiencing run down housing and retail closer to campus then in the outer areas of the city. 8. More regulation = bad. 9. Some high deposits make it hard for someone who is getting on their feet to begin renting. 10. Forcing 3 answers on the previous question biases the results of the question invalidating the entire process. 11. Housing it is the main thing that people leave or stay, if they cannot afford their living, they will be always looking for better rates. 12. It's hard to keep staff because staff have to have family help or a second/ third job to afford to live in college station. When I first moved here in 2014 I paid $425 for a rv spot on an rv park. In 2016 I moved to an apartment and paid $750. We are now in a 3/2 house (moved last year) for $1600. And we're lucky the house across from ours is a 4/2 and rents for nearly 4k. Even with roommates that is unaffordable for 90% of people. 13. Due to the increased rent across the board it makes it harder to find willing staff for a fair rate. 14. It effects members of the congregation. 15. Doing business in Bryan is much easier, more convenient and less expensive than doing business in College Station. Page 210 of 223 162CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Homeownership Affordability and Availability – What could the City of College Station do to help make homeownership more attainable? 1. Condominiums and Townhouses-cluster around re-developed areas including mixed use. 2. TAMU has unfortunately not played its part here. The university should be held partially accountable and pay the city for improvements. 3. Reduce cost of development fee. 4. Increase townhome and condo development. 5. Continue down payment assistance. 6. Low cost loans based on income for refurbishment. 7. Get ownership and fixed up properties. 8. Reconsider the impacts that 4 unrelated has had on crushing neighborhoods and disincentivizing proper student housing. It’s incredibly destructive. 9. Build apartments for students and restrict more neighborhoods to 2 unrelated. 10. Work to bring employers that pay what is needed for affordable homes. 11. Incentives for developers and businesses to contribute to housing to make it more affordable to citizens. 12. Explore options that would decrease the cost of constructing housing units. 13. Consider a Dallas-style local downpayment assistance program and existing federal program. 14. “Homeownership” is not the issue. Unhoused people are seeking housing of any and all kinds. Apartment units are skyrocketing in price and there must be something done to make these housing options more affordable. Graduate students make ~2K a month. Unhoused people can’t work to afford a house. Temporary housing (shelters, coops, missions, etc.) must be invested in and property managers must be reigned in to lower the cost of apartment and HUD rentals. PUBLIC MEETING FEEDBACK Page 211 of 223 163CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Innovative Ideas – What innovative ideas do you have to help address housing needs in the City of College Station? 1. Make housing a little bit cheaper. 2. Incentivize high paying jobs to town. 3. Making the housing we already have affordable, stop trying to expand so quickly. 4. Electric trolleys between TAMU or downtown Bryan, etc. 5. Stop trying to make more houses and try to make the ones more affordable. 6. Restrict all single family housing built prior to 1970 to no more than 2 unrelated to provide “starter homes” for townies. 7. With world-class Construction Science Programs, consider 3D options and other lower cost methods aesthetically pleasing. 8. First, I think three groups have three different needs: permanent residents, students-affordable housing and residents-affordable housing. Ideas for students: Middle/shared housing – done. No more than 4 keeps pricing reasonable. Partner with TAMU for student housing. Give subsidies/incentives to apartment buildings on Anderson and Harvey. UT is pitching in for affordable housing in Austin, why can’t TAMU do that in conjunction with the City helping incentivize renewal in areas near campus (south). All along Texas Avenue, build mixed-use. (Brown’s Shoes strip center, Barnes & Noble strip center). Again, have TAMU give affordable housing vouchers. Students can rent for about $500 a month if 4 in a place. Students need bike lanes along Holleman, Anderson and Texas Ave. and Dexter – affordables no car. Ideas for residents: Fix the duplexes, townhomes and apartments we have. Don’t do more shared housing. No more than 2 because prices come down. Rental inspections to ensure quality affordable housing. CDBG campaign to where you knock on businesses doors and talk to rental (apartments, ect.) owners to use this incentive. 9. You have to address this issue-students and affordable. 10. We live in a university town. Students want more per house. Affordable wants family housing. 11. Instead of renew, don’t do build to rent. We already have middle housing. 12. Learn from others who have been through this in other cities. 13. More collaboration between the City of Bryan and the City of College Station in order to see how our workforce could be integrated back into College Station. 14. More temporary/low-cost single occupancy apartments where low-income folks can prioritize saving money for a home. A significant percentage of your population is students for whom homeownership is not an option and who are exploited by “homeowners” for rent. Regulate the rent!! Not the residents! Page 212 of 223 164CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 15. More mission and shelter options & emergency rental assistance for folks who receive unexpected rent hikes. 16. Concerning the limitations of unrelated people within one house, the city should regulate occupants per room rather than total occupants per house. 17. There are lots of businesses I think we make housing more affordable by involving corporations. 18. Capping enrollment at the university would help slow down the demand for housing so more units can be built. 19. Housing types and availability are driven by the makeup of the community. When A&M decided to grow, College Station had no plan - 1990-1993 all directed to students. So we were on a catch up 20. Restrict occupancy to no more than 2 per bedroom per HUD guidelines. 21. The property tax should be shifted to a land value tax or a split rate tax that takes the land at a higher rate than structures keeping total revenue the same. This encourages more dense development in high value areas & discourages absentee landlordism to not punish people for improving their house. 22. Turn the Texas A&M golf course into a high density mixed-use affordable housing. I think we should turn Post Oak Mall into a mixed-use high density affordable housing. 23. Utilize zoning to get rid of unnecessary centralized businesses like UHaul on Texas Ave & University and make affordable housing. Housing Unit Production and Variety – What could the City of College Station do to facilitate the production of more housing units and more housing types? 1. Capture and reuse construction materials instead of going to landfill. 2. Low-cost loans for single families for refurbishing in blighted areas. 3. Re-develop areas along Harvey, Anderson, Texas Ave, etc. Go vertical with mixed use. 4. Be careful about copying Austin. The ADU’s have ruined areas of town due to parking making streets impassible. 5. Look into project uprooted at UT to learn more about their anti-gentrification projects/tools. 6. There’s enough development planned. Prioritize low-cost rental projects. Encourage builders to prioritize single occupant, affordable apartment units and work with the student population to show interest. Apply for HUD grants and regulate how much developers are doing to invest in existing residents, not future families. 7. Develop a suitable and economic plan that suits the majority. 8. ADU’s (Accessory dwelling units), duplexes and townhomes – the down payment assistance for infill development of this. Also deal with the NIMBY problem. (not in my backyard) 9. Removing lot and parking requirements would spark more innovation and production in the housing market. 10. Reduce minimum lot size, increase maximum lot coverage and reduce building setback requirements. 11. I would like to see more small homes being built like 2-bedroom cottages or bungalows. Good for young working adults or for retirees. 12. No low-density zoning within 2 miles of campus. 13. Quality modular homes. Page 213 of 223 165CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Affordability and Availability of Rental Units – What could the City of College Station do to help with rental affordability and availability? 1. Place parking garages out into the community in strategic locations to reduce transit traffic into TAMU and disperse acceptable living locations. 2. Incentive mixed use re-development along Harvey, Anderson and other areas adjacent to campus in proximity to Texas Ave. 3. Consider trolley systems in conjunction with TAMU for easy on/off & quicker transit times. 4. TAMU should be a better citizen vs head in the sand approach. 5. Build more rental units that are affordable on the edge of College Station. 6. Deregulate occupancy to increase potential occupancy within existing supply. 7. Allow rental units to be bigger, remove floor limits. Severely lax it. 8. Incentivize complexes accepting HUD housing vouchers. 9. Figure out a way to incentivize non-investment housing. 10. Cap the rent for affordable housing and refuse to allow private equity to continue purchasing affordable housing options – like Southgate – for “revitalization.” Threatening to displace all HUD residents there. If a firm want to develop apartment rentals, low-cost single occupancy units must be prioritized. Also, build more shelters! What Issue is most important to Address? – Please place your dot in the column of the issue you feel is most important for the City to address. 1. Households spending more than 30% of their monthly income on rent – 7 2. Households being unable to purchase a home – 11 3. A lack of housing units and housing unit types – 5 4. Note that said “all of them” - 1 Who needs help with Housing? – Please place your dot in the column of the person you feel most needs assistance with housing. 1. Households with no income – 2 2. Households making less than $20,000 annually – 8 3. Households making less than $50,000 annually – 7 4. Households making less than $80,000 annually – 2 5. Households making less than $120,000 annually – 2 6. Note that said “all of the income levels” - 1 Page 214 of 223 166CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN Please provide any comments or suggestions for the Goals / Strategies / Actions section of the Housing Action Plan 80 respondents gave an answer to this question, (responses like “NA” or “none” were removed and not included). 1. You have to get TAMU to put a cap on enrolment or the housing plan will never be effective. 2. The city needs to coordinate this desire for affordable housing vs increase in property taxes along with school taxes. You cannot move in lower income people and expect them to meet the tax requirements of the city. Force on streets, police and fire for the next 3 years and see where you are. It is cheaper and faster(traffic wise) to come from Snook up HWY 60 than to come from south CS at 7:30 in the morning. I would move too but our house is paid off. 3. I hope things will be ok 4. Most of this is not necessary and will cost a lot to provide limited benefit. A great deal of effort to give the appearance of action that won't provide significant results. The answer is not always more government programs. SURVEY GOALS/STRATEGIES/ACTIONS Page 215 of 223 167CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 5. College Station is paralyzed by the reality that the majority of residents and property owners (investors and students) do not vote or involve themselves with government in large numbers. Other groups such was retired professors disproportionately vote and participate in government. All democracies primarily service the requests of those who participate in voting and government (not the majority of residents and property owners in our community). Therefore: our community shall continue to grow, conforming to those who participate in our democracy. In College Station: that tends to be servicing demands for decreased density in existing residential neighborhoods and increased density in Northgate and west of Wellborn Rd (more predominant student areas). Caught in the crossfire are starter families moving to BCS who are left with little housing options aside from buying homes further and further out from city center and commuting in. Our growth strategy is essentially a plan to exacerbate urban sprawl. 6. I think additional graduate student family housing at a discounted rate (especially for international students) should be a high priority. 7. I think it is a great start, but seems overly simplified. 8. Housing around campus, if rentals, need enforcement of number of individuals and vehicles allowed. Trash around housing near downtown CS is awful. 9. Include an action item to support international students for affordable housing in partnership with Texas A&M as public funds cannot limit the benefit for International students. The reason is, international students on non-immigrant visas pay higher tax dollars annually on their grad stipends. 10. Affordable and sustainable housing should be a priority. Especially as we see extreme weather increasing, houses should be constructed in ways that maximize heat and cold retention, cooling, and good use of energy. 11. Stop targeting students and allow more density around campus as is already noted in the comp plan. Then maybe focus on the rest of the city instead of being held hostage by three neighborhoods. 12. The reasons why local home prices are so high is too many out-of-town investors. Raise property taxes AND counter them with increased homestead exemptions for local voter residents. This shifts the tax burden from voters to non-voters. When no longer a good investment, properties will shift back to residents. Best long term solution, and an easy one to sell. 13. I grew up here but moved away after getting married. Fast forward 10+ years and we moved back to BCS. We decided to rent while looking for a house to buy. There were not many selections. Either a fixer upper in a run down neighborhood, expensive house in a private gated neighborhood or be the only family (with children) among rows of houses aimed for students. Very disappointed! 14. too much to read 15. This housing plan, as written, will not help house lower-income folks. Because of inflated valuations and tax rates, only high-rise condominiums will help, provided they are marketed to lower-income people who aren't planning to use their cheap-ish housing as an Airbnb, or some other "investment" scheme. Property valuations , along with tax rates, have gotten out of control -- a small house, bought about 30 years ago and located well over 3 miles from the university, has increased in imaginary value by some 525%. Pity that wages haven't done the same in order to make the tax bill more affordable. This plan wants to increase density in certain neighborhoods, but doesn't say which neighborhoods will have their character destroyed by the city. Those living in areas designated "single-family residential" aren't interested in more cut-through traffic, noise, or flooding. And lower-income folks living in cheap-ish duplexes or four-plexes aren't "helped" by having to find other, less affordable, housing when their homes get redeveloped. Page 216 of 223 168CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 16. I like the strategies but I am concerned that developers will want to keep the cost of housing high and the supply scarce. 17. City planners want to destroy the existing home developments by putting highways through residential areas, destroying subdivisions and neighborhoods! To say nothing about the financial impact on the value of homes for existing residents! 18. In College Station, there needs to be explicit zoning and definitions of how many individuals can live in a residence in each zone area. The area I live, off of University Oaks Blvd, has experienced a major influx of AgShacks in a neighborhood area. This has resulted in increased noise, traffic and late night partying. Density should not come at the cost of family neighborhoods and must be supported by road and, specifically, parking infrastructure. Where I live, if the current trend continues, will be practically unlivable in terms of quality if the trends over the past few years continue. The city needs to value the living of year round, non-student households that are essential for both the university and local businesses. As of now, I do not believe we are well supported in terms of housing. Best. 19. This is an ambitious (and exciting) plan! I trust that capacity has been assessed to ensure it is a realistic plan. 20. Cheap housing and control over the increase of rent by the properties. Every housing complex is increasing the rent every year by 30-50% without providing any additional benefits or improving the housing. 21. Addressing leasing times throughout the years - International students and other students are often without housing in the summer due to the management. 22. Difficult to legally affect market pressured rents. 23. The action plan is so very non-specific it could apply to anything or nothing. My biggest disappointment is the total disregard of A&M's part in our city's housing issues. 24. Stop the government overreach and let people live with who they want to 25. Many options are presented in this but there doesn't seem to be a clear plan for moving forward. Instead it seems like a lot will be left up to the discretion of whoever, guided by realities unknown at present. Too similar to Midtown - which turned out to be significantly "less than" the grand possibilities initially presented. Isn't it sometimes better to have a real plan, with areas chosen for higher density that don't negatively affect established neighborhoods . Keep zoning instead of making it so malleable (wasn't that the reasoning for MH and HOO areas?). Don't eliminate parking restrictions for goodness sake unless you have a magic way to mandate residents in certain areas only use public transport. 26. I think that one of the biggest problems facing our community is the lack of affordable housing. Recognizing that this is a tough problem to solve, I applaud the City for its efforts. 27. Increasing density in existing areas hurts people living nearby with extra traffic and noise. Renters in units to be torn down will be displaced, and face increased rents. This plan creates too many programs, either increasing staff workload, or increasing taxes to pay for new staffers. 28. Assumes there is far too little housing available when reality is that occupancy of existing stock is moderate. Assumes the City is responsible to "create" housing. Way too much government overreach, and way too little respect for existing and long term owners. How about enforcing existing zoning and deed restrictions? 29. Create space for high-density housing for students and address on-street parking. 30. Need to protect family neighborhoods from being infiltrated by Airbnb’s & student rentals. 31. Strategy 7 would incorporate using HCV program with landlords to help guarantee payments and to increase diversification and Deconcentration of poverty in the city housing. Page 217 of 223 169CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 32. I don’t feel the city cares or listens. 33. Its not a plan, its a list of ideas. They aren't bad ideas, just not concrete. 34. Need to have homeowners assoc. decide if your area is open to options 35. I can't afford to live in College Station making a teacher salary. Your housing market is out of control and we continually look to move outside the city limits. The rental market is also out of control with no regulation or accountability with rental owners. Our rent increases every year regardless. When we move (because we have to about every three years), I would like more required transparency on ownership of rental property so we know specifically who we are renting from. I've learned to avoid a few owners due to their inability to manage the property well. Also, when you raise the property values to extraordinarily uneconomical levels, it also affects the rental cost. Not to mention they are building houses on top of each other with no consideration of privacy. So the only new builds aren't great for families. I've also noticed that the builders in the area build really poor residential construction. There needs to be accountability for the number of complaints against owners. 36. Quality of life issues are not being addressed. It’s just more of the same - pack people in, crowd them in, smaller lot sizes, etc. Our roads were not designed for such high density. Traffic is already an issue. More growth at the expense of quality of life, at the expense of things that make a quality life like trails, parks, ponds, and shared green spaces. It’s so frustrating to see another plan to pack it dense and collect more taxes while the glaring density problems are made worse. 37. Unless measures are taken to significantly reduce investor purchased housing, the home values will always be artificially high, preventing lower income or new buyers from purchasing homes. The Plan should focus not only on the housing quantity crunch, but also the ability to lure resident buyers into purchasing. Resident buyers will care about the integrity of neighborhoods and add to the community value. While rental property is scarce, allowing outside investors to purchase prime real estate and demolish to build "Ag Shacks" is detrimental to College Station in the long run. 38. the data in the report shows significant growth in retirement age population which generally is choosing to come live here due to Aggieland and has $$. The second point I would make is the data for average income and income vs rent costs needs to be normalized for the 70,000 students that are not trying to earn money, and based on the amenities and fancy high rises being built it doesn’t seem rent is a major issue for them. Having a student that attended A&M and Texas, it was still much cheaper in BCS vs Austin. 39. Concerned about the mechanism being created turning into a tax burden on other citizens 40. The main goal within the action that majority of the residents within the Bryan/College Station community will be to make housing affordable. The town is a small community and with not many job opportunities especially those with a high pay. The town also is mainly consisting of college aged students from the ages of 18-25. This age range is focusing on school and cannot afford certain places, especially above the amount of $1100 a month. These prices will cause Bryan/College Station to become a town of nothing of these prices continue to soar. 41. I don’t know the goals or proposed strategies. Page 218 of 223 170CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 42. The comprehensive housing plan developed by the City staff is, without a doubt, carefully considered, meticulous and robust. Population growth in the twin Cities and increasing student enrollment at Texas A & M have created housing challenges that will take collaborative and sustained efforts short and long term. I believe the inter-generational home share program is a particularly strong proposition in allowing residents who may be on a fixed income to leverage the equity in their homes, while also creating affordable options for the student population! Similarly, the creation of a Municipal Housing Authority is an excellent idea, as a centralized resource for citizens. An interesting point to explore would be partnerships with local real estate agents who are at the forefront of search efforts for clients across the entire income spectrum. I also appreciate the homestead exemption campaign as an additional and valuable tool to increase affordability for existing and prospective homeowners. All in all, a strong plan that involves multiple stakeholders, offers creative and realistic solutions and achievable goals. 43. Proposed actions appear sound and aspirational, but outsized pressure from the development community directed at elected and appointed city leadership cannot be allowed to thwart this important endeavor. 44. More affordable housing. Rent for housing near campus is ridiculously expensive given we’re all students and many pay for rent and utilities on their own. 45. I believe making housing more affordable for the lower income families will definitely help with housing. I also think there needs to be more done to fight criminal behavior, child abuse, etc. I don't make enough money to become a home owner, I would like to be one. However, I can't find anything in my budget 46. I doubt the ability of ANY governmental organization to do quality, economically sound (for the community) work. Someone will make tons and tons of money while the average tax payer will get slammed with additional fees, taxes, and wasted spending. 47. Allow more than four non-related residents to live together for the sake of affordable housing. College is the only time in our lives that we can put 7-8 girls in a house together and make memories that will last a lifetime. 48. I do not know the housing plan... 49. Rental assistance programs for single family homes. A low income community of homes out on the country side. Come up with an individualized monthly rent payment based off of income. 50. The Housing Action Plan is enthusiastic and hopeful. It lacks information regarding the limits behind occupancy in residences close to campus. Thanks for taking action towards helping out the community and the students that keep it thriving. 51. Who’s paying for this action aid? Does this involve federal aid or federal oversight? Will Texas a&m be donating the land for the student portion of this agenda? Will there be tax rewards for existing homeowners currently acting in success yet needing updated affordable services? 52. You need to link the document???? How are we supposed to read it! 53. I've not seen the plan so I can't say if it'll be helpful or not. You need to be focusing on lowering taxes!!!! 54. A vague city-planner-ese gobbledygook wish list. No limitations or direction on WHERE anything happens. No specific mention of neighborhood protection or student housing. Really??? Page 219 of 223 171CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 55. There needs to be some direct language surrounding creating policies or innovative solutions for young families. There are so few options to become homeowners here for young families because investors pay full asking price and then rent to us at spectacular rates. Especially for those of us who have young children in daycare and do not want to be house-poor, where are our options? How are we represented in this plan moving forward. Good on those who bought before the pandemic at reasonable interest rates. I feel like so many of us will rent forever, which means that rich investors who do not live here will continue to collect my rent as long as I choose to work and live in BCS. 56. Find ways to make housing more affordable for residents with families that are not attending TAMU or Blinn, but are hardworking families that desire to live in decent housing and nice neighborhoods. 57. The city is wasting our resources & time with this focus. 58. My family loves College Station, we have to rent cause houses that are in our price range get bought out by landlords. Our rent goes up average $100 + per year. We can't compete with landlords renting out houses with 3+ individuals and renting out per room. It's becoming harder and harder to find places to afford to rent. The housing market is way to high for the middle class families. 59. More affordable housing for middle class citizens. More utility options for citizens. 60. We need housing for avg income families not college students 61. Unsure of what the action plan is intended for and how it will be helpful. 62. This looks a lot like what happened in Austin. What they omitted in their attempts to provide housing for all coming to the area, was quality of life for current residents. They rushed things, cramming more people into areas with inadequate infrastructure. This, regardless of no space for parking, multi-story housing right up to property lines. It was not done carefully or with any consideration of existing neighborhoods. An out of town visitor commented recently about the car wash next to the cemetery. It’s because they could do it. CS needs to grow in a way we can be proud of years from now, not how fast we can throw something together. 63. Focus is needed on wheelchair accessible rental housing options for low to moderate income disabled persons. HC accessible is frequently woefully inadequate when it comes to wheelchair accessibility needs. I do not see this addressed anywhere in the plan. 64. A whole lot less multifamily/student housing, and more focus on medium level income, housing. Neighborhoods for mid-level people like teachers. Streets that will accommodate traffic going both ways, and neighborhood parks. 65. I am concerned with deed restricting neighborhoods by using income criteria. I feel that this could potentially be viewed as steering and could violate protected classes. Also, restricting resale value would prevent these lower income families from benefiting from the gained equity in their home over time. I believe that higher density and less development restrictions are needed throughout the Brazos Valley. It makes me happy to see that College Station is taking the initiative to engage developers and builders to aid in this matter. Many cities across the nation are implementing similar programs and they are successful. 66. Stop punishing the mouth that feeds you. The students make up a large population that keeps this city running and brings a lot of money to the economy. Stop this punishment and restricting who can live where. With out the Students and TAMU then the city would not be here. People should be able to choose how they use their property. There are areas already in place where people can live and not be near/around students. 67. CS does not now and has never demonstrated enforcement of documented construction, zoning and land use planning and we have zero confidence in improvements with this plan. Page 220 of 223 172CSTX.GOV | CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HOUSING ACTION PLAN 68. Eliminate Occupancy Restrictions 69. I really appreciated all the thought given to how we can help those in need in College Station. I especially appreciated the idea of promoting inter-generational housing opportunities as well as alternative and energy-efficient homes. Really great stuff! 70. Y'all are going to be in a constant tug of war with A&M and the seasonal students. This isn't really a place I plan to settle down in as I have no ties to the University. 71. You are definitely on the right track. You need to consider impact fee waivers for affordable housing as well. The impact fees from CoCS and Wellborn water are affordability killers... 72. Pricing control is a must. My apartment has gone up over $300 in 2 years 73. In Goal 1 Action 3 regarding sustainability, I suggest including a plan for conservation or restoration of biodiversity to promote a healthy ecosystem where housing will be developed. Environmental impact reports may address this. 74. I think the Housing Action Plan is a great idea that can be used to make houses more affordable and available for everyone. 75. With the cost of construction over the past 10years more than doubling and the rental market not able to keep up in proportion with construction costs there would have to be more incentive to developers to build and hold new homes. 76. More affordable housing options in CS will be important for local families 77. Not a fan of deed restrictions or property tax exemptions 78. Increasing housing density leads to unfavorable conditions for existing homeowners who enjoy the peace and quiet. What the hell are you thinking!!! How about reducing the property tax by 50% so people can afford the homes they already have!!! 79. Can't provide affordable housing (purchase or rent) with high property taxes. Not a good business for people that wants to invest, due to very low rate of return. 80. You can’t make affordable housing in cs at this point. Growth is expensive. Land is expensive. Why not have the city buy apartment buildings, renovate them and have rent control. Trying to have someone buy a house that isn’t affordable doesn’t make sense. Page 221 of 223 “Advise on and make recommendations for the City of College Station Housing Action Plan in order to present a unified vision for the future, and to recommend for approval a final plan that reflects the community’s vision for housing action and initiatives.” The Committee worked with staff since November 2023 to review existing conditions and citizen and stakeholder feedback, to assess tools available for addressing housing issues, and to help create the recommendations in the draft Goals, Strategies, and Actions Report. Housing Action Plan Steering Committee Members POSITION 1 – GERALYN NOLAN POSITION 2 – BLANCHE BRICK – CO-CHAIR POSITION 3 – TIONA BROUSSARD POSITION 4 – FRED DUPRIEST POSITION 5 – MIKE ALAN HOLMGREEN POSITION 6 – BLAKE JENNINGS POSITION 7 – CARLA ROBINSON POSITION 8 – CHARLES LANE BARR POSITION 9 – KATHERINE NICHOLE FLYNN POSITION 10 – DELIA PEREZ-NUNEZ POSITION 11 – DIANA MARIE WOOD POSITION 12 – JODI WARNER – CHAIR POSITION 13 – SUZANNE DROLESKEY Page 222 of 223 cstx.gov Page 223 of 223