HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/18/2004 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning Commission•
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION
March 18, 2004
Workshop Meeting - 6:00 P.M.
Regular Meeting -- 7:Od P.M.
•
College Station
Entbracfng fhe Past, Exploring the Future
AGENDA
Workshop Meeting
Planning and Zoning Commission
Thursday, March 18, 2004, at 6:00 p.m.
Training Room, College Station City Hall
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas
i. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items.
2. Discussion of minor and amending plats approved by Staff.
None.
•
3. Discussion of Subcommittee Reports.
4. Consideration, discussion and possible action of city-initiated rezonin~s
along State Highway 6 in the Arrington Road area.
5. Consideration, discussion and possible action regarding an Amendment to
the Unified Development Ordinance as it relates to attached sipnape and
banners.
6. Update, discussion and possible action on a proposed connectivity index and
pedestrian access ways in residential subdivisions.
7. Discussion and possible action on future spends items - A Planning and
Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been
given. A statement of spedflc factual information or the redtatton of
existing policy may be liven. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal
to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
8. Adjourn
Consult,tion with Attnenev Gov't ~e ~ctibn bS1.071~ ;possible actin:
•
The Planning and Zoning Commission may seek advice from its attorney regaMing a pending and contemplated
litigation subject or attorney-client privileged Information. After executive session discussion, any final action or
vote taken will be in public. If litigation or attorney-client privileged information Issues arise as to the posted
subject matter of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, an executive session will be held.
This building Is wheelchair accassibla. Handicapped parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive
seMce must ba made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call 979-764-3517 or (T'DD) 1-800-
735-2989. Agendas posted on Internet Website htto://www.csbc.oov and Cable Access Channel 19.
N&Z Workshop Agenda March 18, 2004
pagelofi
•
College Station N
Esrbracing the Past, Exploring the Futura
C,
1. Hear Citizens. At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to
address the Commission on planning and zoning issues not already scheduled on
tonight's agenda. The citizen presentations will be limited to three minutes in order
to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow
adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the
information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future
agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name
and address for the record.)
2. Public Comment on the Unified DeveloQment Ordinance [UDO). At this time,
the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address the Commission on
the recently adopted Unified Development Ordinance. The dtizen comments will be
limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address
the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The
Commission will receive the information and it will be added to the public record. (A
recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the
record.)
All matters listed under Item 3, Consent Agenda, are considered to be routine by the
Planning and Zoning Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items inGude
preliminary and Tina/ plats, where stall` has f~nund compilance w/th all minimum subdivis/on
regulations. All Items approved by Consent are approved w/th any and all staff
recommendations. There will not be separate discussion of i'fiese items. If any
Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Cor-ser-t Agenda ft will be moved to the
Regular Agenda f>Dr further consideration.
3. Consent Agenda.
3.1 Consideration, discussion and possible action on the minutes:
^ February 19, 2004 Workshop Minutes
• March 4, 2004 Workshop Minutes
• March 4, 2004 Regular Minutes
3.2 Consideration, discussion and possible action on a Preliminary Piat for Dickson
Run consisting of 2 lots on 15.747 acres, located at the bend in Calumet Trail
adjacent to Woodlake Subdivision in the City's ET]. (04-44)
3.3 Consideration, discussion and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for
Castlegate Section 7 consisting of 24 lots on 31.094 acres located off
Castlegate Drive, southeast of its intersection with Victoria Avenue. (04-51)
•
AGENDA
Regular Meeting
Planning and Zoning Commission
Thursday, March 18, 2004, at 7:00 p.m.
Council Chambers, College Station City Hell
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas
This building is wFlaelchair accessible. Handicapped parking spaces are available. Any request for sign Interpretive
service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call 979-764-3517 or (T'DD) 1-800-
735-2989. Agendas posted on Internet Website htto://vwvw.csbc.aov and Cable Acoess Channel 19
rts~c Agenaa
March 18, 2004
Page i of 2
Regular Agenda.
• 4. Consideration, discussion and possible action on request(s) for absence
from meetings.
5. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the
Consent Agenda by Commission action.
6. Consideration, discussion and possible action on a Vacating Plat and Final
Plat for the Indian Lakes Subdivision Phase I consisting of 85 lots on 400
acres generally located at the south end of Arrington Road in the City's ET7.
(04-47)
7. Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Replat for Herman F.
Krenek Phase II consisting of 2 lots on 2.94 acres generally located off
Texas Avenue and Brentwood Drive. (04-45)
8. Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Replat for the University
Preserve Subdivision (save and except Lots 14R and 15R) consisting of 25
residential lots on 11.5 acres generally located at 1207 Munson. (04-40)
9. Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Rezoning for Phase 6 of
the Castlegate Subdivision from A-O Agricultural Open to PDD Planned
Development District, consisting of 10.80 acres generally located on the
north side of Greens Prairie Road, lust west of Castlegate Drive. (04-48)
10. Public hearing, dis~xlssion, and possible action on a Rezoning for Nantucket
• Phase 7, consisting of 4.794 acxes located south of Nantucket Drive
between State Highway 6 and Harper's Ferry Road from A-0 Agricultural
Open to R-i Single Family Residential. (04-54)
ii. Public hearing, discussion and possible action on an Amendment to Article
2, Development Review Bodies, and Article 5, District purpose Statements
and Supplemental Standards, of the Unified development Ordinance,
creating an overlay zoning district for properties fronting Krenek Tap Road
for a depth of 750'. (04-36)
12. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and
Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been
given. A statement of spedfic factual information or the redtation of
existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal
to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
13. Adjourn.
Consultation wkh Attorney ~6ov't C!+ae ~Ctbn SR1.071~ • possible actbn
The Planning and Zoning Commission may seek advice from Its attomey regarding a pending and contemplated
• litigation subject or attorney-client privileged (ntonnatlon. ARer executive session discussion, any final adJon or
vote taken will be in public. If litigation or attorney-client privileged information issues arise as to the posted
subject matter of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, an executive session will be held.
P&Z Agenda March 18, 2004 Page 2 of 2
•
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM N0.3.1
Minutes
February 19, 2004 Workshop Meeting
March 4, 2004 Workshop Meeting
March 4, 2004 Regular Meeting
• ~
College Station
Embracing the Past, Exploring the Fu[ure
MINUTES
Workshop Meeting
Planning and Zoning Commission
Thursday, February 19, 2004, at 6:00 p.m.
Training Room, College Station City Hall
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT:. Shafer, Reynolds, White, Williams, Davis and Trapani.
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Hall.
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: None.
STAFF PRESENT: Assistant City Manager Brown, Development Services
Director Templin, Development Manager Ruiz, City
Planner Kee, Senior Planner Fletcher, Graduate Civil
Engineer Cotter and Staff Assistant Hazlett.
Commissioner Shafer called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
i. Discussion of ~nsent and regular agenda items.
• Discussion ensued regarding development in and around the floodplain area of the
William Brooke Hunter Estates, Consent Agenda Item No. 3.3. Development Manger
Ruiz stated that the engineers are looking at possibly rezoning that area in order to
construct amulti-family or duplex development. At the time of the rezoning, the
Commission can discuss the site plan as well as the layout plans. She added that the
applicant is considering mostly staying out of the floodplain area. Ms. Ruiz reported
having seen some preliminary layouts and said that the applicant is also considering
picking up some of the other tracts to consolidate the area in order to create a larger
development. Staff is working with the multi-family project across Southwest
Parkway on aligning the driveways off Southwest Parkway, which is the reason for
the proposed private access easement. An additional curb cut along Wellborn Road
has not been agreed upon by TX DOT so this will need to be reviewed at the time of
the site plan. There was some further discussion about access and a land lock
situation.
2. Discussion of minor and amending plats approved by Staff.
^ Edelweiss Business Center, Lots 7R & 7R Blodc 2 (04-17)
Ms. Ruiz explained that this minor plat was for the Southwest Business Center which
is currently under construction on Wellbom Road. The interior lot line was shifted to
facilitate a parking lot layout. The plat has been filed for record.
3. Discussion of Subcommittee Reports.
• East Side Thoroughfare Plan and Land Use Update.
P&Z Workshop Minutes February 19, 2004 Page i of 4
City Planner Kee reported that a meeting is scheduled for the Emerald Forest
Homeowners Association on February 26, 2004.
Ms. Kee also updated the Commission on the outcome of the previous meeting,
stating that the atizens were very amenable to the plans. A survey sheet was
distributed and the results were 3-i in favor of the plan. The issues of concern were
site specific. The item is scheduled to come before the Commission on March 18,
2004.
A discussion regarding the cross section and plans for a median or wider street at
Linda Lane followed.
4. Discussion, consideration and possible action regarding an amendment to
the subdivision Regulations, Section 18, Platting in Older Residential
Subdivisions.
Development Services Director Templin recapped the background information on a
previous development that pertained to the amendment. He added that the
applicant will be returning with a replat request to split one lot and reapportion it in
order to create two lots. Both lots will meet the 8500 square feet requirement, but
they must also meet the average block requirement. Mr. Templin further explained
that the direction staff received from legal counsel was to allow for the additional
lots. A brief discussion regarding traffic ensued. Mr. Templin pointed out that the
replat will go before the City Counal on February 26, 2004 and the Commission on
March 18, 2004. The Munson area residents will be notified.
After reviewing the lot sizes on the plat, Commissioner Shafer stated that he believes
• the lot sizes are reasonable.
Development Manager Ruiz interjected that if the Ordinance is passed by the City
Counal on February 26, 2004, then the plat will meet the standards. If it is not
passed, a variance request will be required from the Commission at the March 18,
2004 meeting. She added that action must be taken on the plat at that time.
A discussion regarding plats and the Commission's responsibilities ensued. There
was some question as to whether or not safety was a valid reason for denial. Ms.
Ruiz stated that she met with Assistant City Attorney Nemcik regarding a previous
plat that was denied by the Commission for safety reasons. She reported that Ms.
Nemcik felt the Commission had some authority and discretion in the alignment for
that particular plat and could require the alignment.
5. Consideration, discussion and possible action regarding neighborhood
integrity issues including requiring garages.
Development Services Director Templin announced the City Council Workshop
meeting on February 26, 2004, where Neighbofiood Integrity Issues will be a topic
of discussion. He stated that both Fire Chief Giordano and Assistant Fire Chief Hurt
traveled to a number of college communities from Blacksburg, Virginia to Boulder,
Colorado where they engaged in numerous discussions regarding neighbofiood
integrity issues.
Discussion regarding homestead exemptions and garages followed with some brief
remarks regarding maximum lot coverage with an impervious surface. Also
discussed was the definition of a family. Mr. Templin will forward the Belle Terre
Ordinance to the Commission for their review.
P8~Z Workshop Minutes February 19, 2004 Page 2 of 4
6. Consideration, discussion and possible action regarding lighting regulations
in the Unified Development Ordinance.
Development Services Director Templin pointed out that the Unified Development
Ordinance does not allow the lighting element to extend beyond the bottom of the
fixture, creating a lateral glare. The ordinance is not applicable to existing sites.
However, newly permitted sites would be required to meet the standards set forth in
the UDO. Development Manager Ruiz interjected that with the UDO, if you are
within 150 feet of a residential area, there are some additional requirements for your
building mounted lights as well.
7. Consideration, discussion and possible action re: Wolf Pen Creek design
requirements for public and private developments.
Development Services Director Templin explained that private development items in
the Wolf Pen Creek area are typically reviewed by the Design Review Board (DRB).
However, this is not the case for governmental structures or signage. Those items
go before the Oversight Board. Mr. Templin stated that the electronic sign has been
a topic of discussion in excess of two years.
Discussion regarding the responsibilities and the items reviewed by the Oversight
Committee ensued. The Commissioners agreed that all developments should be
required to meet the same design standards and qualifications in Wolf Pen Creek.
Development Review Manager Ruiz interjected that in terms of the setback and size
of the sign in question, it does meet the sign ordinance qualifications. With regards
to flashing and blinking signs, Ms. Ruiz explained that a sign giving only time and
temperature is exempt from the requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance
(UDO). Other electronic signs that change more than once every 24 hours are
prohibited. She added that signs which were permitted prior to the adoption of the
UDO are allowed to change their messages more often than once every 24 hours.
Commissioner Reynolds proposed that one regulating body be responsible for new
construction, including signage, for both public and private entities in Wolf Pen
Creek.
Commissioner Trapani motioned to review and approve all new construction,
including signage, for ail entities both public and private in the Wolf Pen Creek
Design District. The motion was seconded by Commissioner White.
Chairman Shafer suggested the board for doing so as the DRB (Design Review
Board). Commissioner Trapani asked if this would also indude trails and etc.
Chairman Shafer stated it would be only site plan issues, since trails and such would
be more along the line of a master plan issue. Commissioner Reynolds suggested
just adding public to the private description already written in the UDO for that
board, but not to indude infrastructure. City Planner Key read the ordinance to
clarify the Commission's Intent. Chairman Shafer confirmed that the DRB should see
all matters regarding site plan issues in the Wolf Pen Creek Design District.
Chairman Shafer called the question. The motion carried 6-0.
FOR: Shafer, Trapani, White, Davis, Reynolds and Williams.
AGAINST: None.
ABSENT: Hall.
8. Consideration, discussion and possible action regarding a proposed overlay
for Krenek Tap Road.
P&Z Workshop Minutes February 19, 2004 Page 3 of 4
City Planner Kee stated that the subject area began as part of a municipal complex
which extended across Krenek Tap Road. She added that the proposed overlay will
• come before the Commission on March 18, 2004. Also, Ms. Kee stated that the
underlying zoning is still applicable and that the overlay will apply to properties along
Krenek Tap Road for a depth of 750'. She cited a few architectural standards such
as no parking between buildings and the Krenek Tap frontage and a maximum
setback if there is a single family development.
Commissioner Trapani asked if there will be something about connectivity in the
area. Ms. Kee explained that there would not be specifically, but that the City will
deal with these issues and others during the platting stage as it is developed.
9. Discussion and possible action on future agenda Items - A Planning and
Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been
given. A statement of spedfic factual information or the redtatlon of
existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal
to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
Senior Planner Fletcher announced several upcoming workshops and encouraged the
Commissioners to attend.
Development Review Manager Ruiz reported that Planning intern Harrell has done
some further research on the sign and banner issue and is preparing a report for the
Commission of her findings. Development Services Director Templin stated that the
options are open, are resource driven and should be simple and easily enforceable.
Commissioner Davis had questions regarding landscape provisions and the
• replacement of trees that have not survived the initial development of a site. Ms.
Ruiz explained that several sites went into code enforcement this past summer and
areas are being policed. Further enforcement efforts are planned.
10. Adjourn
Commissioner Trapani motioned to adjourn the meeting which was seconded by
Commissioner White. The motion carried 6-0.
FOR: Shafer, Trapani, White, Davis, Reynolds and Williams.
AGAINST: None.
ABSENT: Hall.
APPROVED:
ATTEST:
Chairman, Scott Shafer
Staff Assistant, Susan Hazlett
•
P&Z Workshop Minutes February 19, 2004 Page 4 of 4
•
College Station N
Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future
MINUTES
Workshop Meeting
Planning and Zoning Commission
Thursday, March 4, 2004, at 6:00 p.m.
Training Room, College Station City Hall
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman Shafer, Commissioners White, Davis, Williams,
Hall and Reynolds.
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Commissioner Trapani.
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: None.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF PRESENT: Development Services Director Templin,
City Planner Kee, Transportation Planner Fogle, Senior Planner Fletcher, Staff Planners
Prochazka and Reeves, Planning Intern Harrell, Development Manager Ruiz, Graduate Civil
Engineers Thompson and Cotter, and Staff Assistant Hazlett.
OTHER CITY STAFF PRESENT: Assistant City Manager Brown, Action Center
Representative Kelley and Assistant City Attorney Nemcik.
• OTHER GUESTS PRESENT: John McBeth and Jennifer Montgomery, Brazos Transit
Systems.
i. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items.
An extensive discussion regarding Zero Lot Line Construction ensued. Development
Manager Ruiz, Fire Marshall Hurt and Building Official Simms answered questions and
explained the process in drafting the language for the amendment in order to clarify
the requirements that will align the current contradictions and discrepanaes in the
UDO and International Residential Code.
2. Discussion of minor and amending plats approved by Staff.
There were none.
3. Update and discussion regarding future agenda Items requested by the
Commission.
• Consideration, discussion and possible action regarding bus
stops/covers and associated off-premise advertising.
John McBeth, General Manager of The District, a public transit agency, spoke to this
issue, displaying several styles, designs and concepts of bus stop covers, both
current and future planned shelters. Mr. McBeth stated that he anticipates
September 04 as the earliest date for purchasing the approved model at a 10% local
• share. The District's goal is to provide the shelters at no cost the dties.
P&Z Minutes Workshop Meeting Page i of 2
Also discussed was the off-premise advertising which is currently not allowed in
either Bryan or College Station per city ordinances. However, there was some
• favorable discussion regarding advertising on the transit buses that followed.
4. Discussion and possible action regarding an Amendment to the Unified
Development Ordinance as it relates to creating and applying an overlay
zoning district for properties along Krenek Tap Road.
Time did not allow for discussion of this item. It will be rescheduled for a subsequent
workshop meeting.
5. Consideration, diswssion and possible action regarding development
requirements for driving ranges and additional development criteria when
located adjacent to single-family homes.
Time did not allow for discussion of this item. it will be rescheduled for a subsequent
workshop meeting.
6. Discussion and possible action regarding an Amendment to the Unified
Development Ordinance as it relates to attached signage and banners.
Time did not allow for discussion of this item. It will be rescheduled for a subsequent
workshop meeting.
7. Discussion and possible action of city-initiated rezonings along State
Highway 6 in the Arrington Road area.
• Time did not allow for discussion of this item. It will be rescheduled for a subsequent
workshop meeting.
8. Discussion and possible action on future agenda Items - A Planning and
Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been
given. A statement of spedflc factual Information or the redtation of
existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal
to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting.
9. Adjourn
Commissioner White motioned to adjourn the meeting. The motion was seconded by
Commissioner Williams and carried by a vote of 6-0.
FOR: Shafer, White, Williams, Hall, Reynolds and Davis.
AGAINST: None.
ABSENT: Trapani.
The meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m.
Attest:
Approved
• Susan Hazlett, Staff Assistant Scott Shafer, Chairman
Development Services Planning and Zoning Commission
P&Z Minutes Workshop Meeting Page 2 of 2
• ~
College Stat/on N
Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future
•
MINUTES
Regular Meeting
Planning and Zoning Commission
Thursday, March 4, 2004, at 7:00 p.m.
Council Chambers, College Station City Hall
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Shafer, White, Hall, Davis, Williams and
Reynolds.
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Trapani.
CITY COUNCIL MEMEBERS PRESENT: None.
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Assistant City Manager Brown, Development
Services Director Templin, City Planner Kee,
Development Manager Ruiz, Senior Planner
Fletcher, Staff Planners Prochazka and Reeves,
Planning Intern Harrell, Transportation Planner
Fogle, Graduate Civil Engineers Cotter and
Thompson, Assistant City Attorney Nemcik, Fire
Marshall Hurt, Building Official Simms, Center
Representative Kelley and Staff Assistant Hazlett.
Chairman Shafer called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m.
1. Hear Citizens.
No one spoke.
2. Public Comment on the Unified Development ordinance [UIDO).
No comments were made.
3. Consent Agenda.
Commissioner Davis motioned to approve the consent agenda items. Commissioner
Williams seconded the motion. The motion carried 6-0.
FOR: Shafer, Hall, Davis, Reynolds, Williams and White.
AGAINST: None.
ABSENT: Trapani.
3.1
3.2
C~
P&Z Minutes
Approved by consent the minutes:
^ February 19, 2004 Regular Minutes
Approved by consent a Final Plat for the USDA Subdivision consisting of 1 lot
on 1.7 acres generally located at 1001 Holleman Drive. (04-18)
March 4, 2004
Page 1 of 5
3.3 Approved by consent a Final Plat for the William Brooke Hunter Estates
consisting of 2 lots on 9.7 acres generally located at Wellborn Road and
Southwest Parkway. (04-33)
3.4 Approved by consent a Final Plat for Callaway Subdvision Phase II consisting
of i lot on 14 acres generally located at Marion Pugh Drive and Luther Street
West. (04-30)
3.5 Approved by consent a Preliminary Piat for the Foxworth Subdivision
consisting of 2 lots on 41.493 acres generally located at the corner of North
Graham and South Dowling Roads in the City's ET7. (04-12)
4. Consideration, discussion and possible action on request(s) for absence
from meetings,
Commissioner Davis motioned to approve the absences. Commissioner Williams
seconded the motion. The motion carried 6-0.
FOR: Shafer, Hall, Davis, Reynolds, Williams and White.
AGAINST: None.
ABSENT: Trapani.
•
5. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the
Consent Agenda by Commission action.
No items were removed from the Consent agenda for discussion.
6. Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on an ordinance amending
the City of College Station's Comprehensive Plan for the area bound by
Harvey Road (SH 30) on the north, Greens Prairie Road on the south, SH 6
on the west, and SH 30 on the east. (04-37)
Transportation Planner Fogle presented the Staff Report. He explained that Staff has
been working with a subcommittee to update various components of the
Comprehensive Plan for the subject area. He added that Staff proposes to amend
the Thoroughfare, Bikeway and Land Use Plans. He identified the goals of the
update and explained the process that was used in developing the proposed
amendments.
Chairman Shafer opened the public hearing.
Sherry Ellison, 2705 Brookway Drive, spoke in regards to neighbofiood traffic
concerns as well as an interest in retaining the greenways and open space areas.
Toe Byrne, 2608 Wingate Court, the representative for both the Homeowners
Association and the Neighbofiood Assodation made comments concerning the
possible extension of Appomattox, traffic concerns on Windwood and using Switch
Station Road as an alternative access. He is meeting with Staff to present and
discuss the residents' ideas.
Mr. Fogle clarified that the proposed amendment shows no changes to Windwood
Drive or Raintree Drive at this time.
Chairman Shafer closed the public hearing.
P&Z Minutes March 4, 2004
Page2of5
Commissioner White motioned to approve the amendment which was seconded by
Commissioner Hall. The motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
FOR: Shafer, Hall, Davis, Reynolds, Williams and White.
AGAINST: None.
ABSENT: Trapani.
7. Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Rezoning for Bridle Gate
Estates Phase Ii, from R-6 High Density Multi-Family to R-i Single Family
Resientlal and consfsting of 27 lots on 8.591 acres located at end of Bridle
Gate Drive. (04-26)
Staff Planner Prochazka presented the Staff Report. In her opening remarks, Ms.
Prochazka stated that Staff recommends approval of the Rezoning, adding that the
subject property was recently platted for single-family development, but is currently
zoned R-6 High Density Multi-family. With the adoption of the Unified Development
Ordinance (UDO), single-family homes are no longer permitted in R-6, which is why
the R-1 rezoning is required. Further, the Land Use Plan designates this area as
Single Family Residential. Access points were pointed out and the alignment of
Longmire was discussed.
Chairman Shafer opened the public hearing.
Since there were no other comments made, Chairman Shafer closed the public
hearing.
Commissioner Williams motioned to approve the rezoning which was seconded by
Commissioner Davis. The motion carried 6-0.
• FOR: Shafer, Hall, Davis, Reynolds, Williams and White.
AGAINST: None.
ABSENT: Trapani.
8. Public heating, discussion, and possible action on a Rezoning for the
Callaway Subdivision Phase 2I consisting of 13.768 acres, located on the
east side of Mahon Pugh Drive approximately 500' south of the intersection
of George Bush DMve, from C-i General Commercial to R-6 High Density
Multi-Family. (04-28)
Staff Planner Prochazka presented the Staff Report. Ms. Prochazka stated that the
applicant requests the rezoning in order to develop the property as a student
housing complex. Approval of the rezoning is recommended. Because the Land Use
Plan designates the subject property as Residential Attached, the rezoning request is
in compliance and is also supported by the City's development policies.
Chairman Shafer opened the public hearing.
Rabon Metcalf, the project engineer, spoke in favor of the rezoning. Access, distance
from the railroad tracks and the number of units planned were briefly discussed.
Chairman Shafer closed the public hearing.
Commissioner White motioned to approve the rezoning. Commissioner Davis
seconded the motion. The motion carried 6-0.
• FOR: Shafer, Hall, Davis, Reynolds, Williams and White.
AGAINST: None.
ABSENT: Trapani.
P&Z Minutes March 4, 2004 Page 3 of 5
9. Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Rezoning for Stephen-
. Anderson consisting of approximately 211.5 acres generally located on
Greens Prairie Road just east of Rock Prairie Road. (04-32)
Staff Planner Reeves presented the Staff Report. She pointed out that the subject
property is shown on the Land Use Plan as Single Family Low Density. Therefore,
Staff recommends approval since the zone change would be in compliance with the
Land Use Plan. The flood plain area was pointed out and the Commission
encouraged protection of the greenway and floodplain areas. Discussion ensued
regarding the minimum lot sizes.
Chairman Shafer opened the public hearing.
Dave Lund, 17141 Rock Prairie Road raised issues regarding the down stream
drainage, utilities and paving Rock Prairie Road.
Kenneth Bonnet, 17155 Rock Prairie Road, spoke on issues of concern regarding the
lack of dty services and infrastructure to the current residents in the subject area.
He also requested the paving of Rock Prairie Road.
The time limitation in the annexation policy for providing city services to annexed
areas was discussed and the current law explained.
Development Services Director Templin stated that Staff has looked into the
concerns of the residents and explained his findings. Assistant City Attorney Nemcik
concurred that Mr. Bonnet's property is serviced by Wellborn Water and Bryan
• Electric and that the City of College Station has no legal authority concerning those
services. Mr. Templin added that the current plan does not include an access on
Rock Prairie Road. Also, if the properties were annexed prior to the most recent
annexation, there would not be city utility service. Assistant City Attorney Nemcik
interjected that generally speaking, the area is not within the city's water or electric
service area.
Chairman Shafer thanked Staff for the clarifications and others for comments and
concems which have been noted. He stated that this seems to be a situation where
we have see how this evolves in terms of this particular development and what
opportunities it does provide to extend services as we go forward.
doe Schultz, 3208 innsbrook Circle, the project engineer, stated that as part of the
platting procedure, a sewer report is required, which is a general design of the sewer
system, whether or not the sewer is constructed. Therefore, sewer will be studied
for this tract. He added that Wellbom Water Supply has a 16" line on Greens Prairie
Road and told the applicant that they would be able to provide fire protection to
meet dty standards and that all water lines would be built to city standards. The
applicant is evaluating access to the site. He stated that they would like Rock Prairie
Road to be paved. In dosing, Mr. Schultz stated that because Rock Prairie Road is
an existing road, in general, private developers do not pave existing roads. Assistant
City Attomey Nemcik interjected that if the developer were required to take access
off Rock Prairie, then they would be responsible in upgrading/paving the road.
Mr. Lund interjected that Lick Creek Park now has a paved entranceway and parking
which encourages additional traffic and requested consideration for paving Rock
• Prairie Road.
Chairman Shafer dosed the public hearing.
PI3eZ Minutes March 4, 2004 Page 4 of 5
Commissioner Davis motioned to approve the rezoning. Commissioner Williams
seconded the motion. The motion carried 6-0.
FOR: Shafer, Hall, Davis, Reynolds, Williams and White.
AGAINST: None.
ABSENT: Trapani.
10. Public hearing, discussion, and possible ad~ion repardin8 an Amendment to
Article 8, Subdivision Desfgn & Improvements and Article i i, Terms of the
City's Unified Development Ordinance. (04-35)
Development Manager Ruiz presented the Staff Report. Ms. Ruiz explained that the
purpose of the amendment is to align the requirements of the zero lot line
construction with the City's UDO and the International Residential Code (IRC). In
their current state, contradictions and discrepancies in the overall requirements
occur. As a result, Staff worked closely with the development community, the
Construction Standards Board and the Fire Marshal to draft language that clarifies
the requirements for zero lot line construction. In closing, Ms. Ruiz reported that an
amendment to the IRC will go before the Construction Standards Board on March 8,
2004 for a recommendation going to the City Council for consideration on March 25,
2004.
Chairman Shafer opened the public hearing.
Since there were no further comments, Chairman Shafer closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Williams motioned to approve the amendment. Commissioner Davis
seconded the motion, which carried by a vote of 6-0.
FOR: Shafer, Hall, Davis, Reynolds, Williams and White.
AGAINST: None.
ABSENT: Trapani.
ii. Discussion and possible action On future agenda Items - A Planning and
Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been
given. A statement of specific factual information or the redtatlon of
existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal
to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meetin8.
Commissioner Davis requested Staff to look at areas on Green Prairie Road in
regards to piece-meal rezoning vs. Comprehensive Plan amendment.
12. Adjourn.
Commissioner Williams motioned to ac~ourn the meeting which was seconded by
Commissioner White. The motion carried 6-0.
FOR: Shafer, Hall, Davis, Reynolds, Williams and White.
AGAINST: None.
ABSENT: Trapani.
APPROVED:
Chairman, Scott Shafer
ATTEST:
Staff Assistant, Susan Hazlett
P&Z Minutes March 4, 2004 Page 5 of 5
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM N0.3.2
Preliminary Plat
Dickson Run
Z 1-
~g
J a
W
d
O
N
N
U
\ ~.,~.
;\
~.
. ,.
:. .. ...
.. .
..
.. ,
~ i ~., _ --
• , ,•:: •.
. • , :- ~ _
..,
.,
..
`\
,.
~ .;•~
.,
.,
~ ~...
~.~.
' ~ i :'. _
.,
.. ~ I ~ ' `.
Y
~` /
:~ 1.~- _
Y ./ ~:.
~" ~~ j'
l / `Y
. .
..
.. .. .
..
.. ,.•'•
..
.;-
..
;,
... •:
„ .
c _.
..
~., 1
.. , .
~:. ~.~
.•:~
--
--- - _
.<
i _.._ _ f
.. .- , _.
~, ;• '-'
-~'"" ~,~~( .~ ~ - _
_.
_..... _... _ _T
i .-
. ~ ;~'T
_ _. - - ~ ~.
.,
-_
1_ _
.;
r i
l _.
.. .
,• ,•
. ~ •., ~. i
,. ~ ,,.
E --- , • _ .
,.
~. -
•. ~:, ~
Z
Y
D
N
X
C
O ~
N WWC
~ G
N Q.
O 0
vV-. W
O
U~
• MEMORANDUM
March 9, 2004
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Carol Cotter
Email: ccotter@cstx.gov
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT for DICKSON RUN
Item: Consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for
Dickson Run consisting of 2 lots on 15.747 acres, located at the bend in Calumet
Trail adjacent to Woodlake Subdivision in the City's ETJ. (04-00500044)
Applicant: Kerr Surveying, agent for owner.
Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat as
• submitted.
Item Summary: This item is for the consideration of a Preliminary Plat for 2 lots
in the City's ETJ. The property is located off Calumet Trail between Royder
Road and Woodlake Drive. The Plat divides the 15.747 acre tract into a 5-acre
lot and a 10.747-acre lot. Both Lots front on Calumet Trail. This Preliminary Plat
meets the minimum requirements for ETJ subdivisions.
Comprehensive Plan Considerations: Calumet Trail is a County road.
Budgetary & Financial Summary: NA
Attachments:
1. Area map
2. Application
3. Copy of Plat
•
-5 ~ FOR OFFIC E Y
P8Z Case No: ~~
~~ Date Submitted: o~ -a3 -O
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION
(check one) Preliminary Plat ^ Master Preliminary Plat
The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for Planning & Zoning
Commission consideration.
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
[~ $400 Application, review, and filing fee.
^ Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations ~ $100 (if applicable)
Q~ Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A revised mylar original must be submitted after staff review.)
^ One (1) copy of the approved Master Development Plan or Master Preliminary Plat if applicable.
(~ A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
^ Rezoning Application if zone change is proposed.
^ Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of
ME OF SUBDIVISION ~l.~n ~u n
CIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION ~['Urnef `7`Vhc
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project):
Name
E-Mail ~nytsc.-t~i'schpr ~ UtUZZav,. nefi
Street Address ~QS (;hui~h ~
City l~ lI ~aP S'i''a~,o" State ~_ Zip Code r17,~~1 /
Phone Number ~8 - ~Q S'" Fax Number __~(-I~'40~/
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: ~ owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet
for multiple owners):
Name ~ d ~ ~{~ ov, P ~ ; ~~ SO n E-Mail
Street Address C I S Sy n~ a~ e ~ TYtti ~
City ~~~~ ~ P ~~ ~ State ~( Zip Code X77 ~~1~~
Phone Number~S'S-o?I a.`i Fax Number
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name
E-Mail
Street Address
'I~~ne Number
State Zip Code
Fax Number
~I Acres Of Subdivision j~S ; '7y 7
Number Of Lots By Zoning District /
R-O-W Acreage /U ~ Total # Of Lots _
/ /
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
~/ / / /
Floodplain Acreage N
Parkland dedication by acreage or fee?
A statement addressing any differences between the preliminary plat and approved master development plan
and/or master preliminary plat (if applicable):
Requested variances to subdivision regulations & reason for same
Requested oversize participation
Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
ACREAGE:
# of Acres to be dedicated
# of acres in detention
OR
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
# of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 =
# of MuRaFamily Dwelling Units X$452 =
(date) Approved by Parks ~ Recreation Board
# of acres in floodplain
# of acres in greenways
s
The applicant has prepared this app/kadon and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached
hereto are tare and coned. The undersigned hereby requests appreval by the City of College Station of the
above identified plat and attests that all respective owners have been identified on this application.
~t /
nature and Title Date T 7
•
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM N0.3.3
Preliminary Plat
Castlegate Section 7
•
2
F-
~g
~a
w
RR R RR,
R
R ° i R
R R i * ^
i q R • ~
i i z ~ O
• R
R q
M ~
s • l
~
R ~
R
i
R
R R
R i ~
•
R ~ R y $ `,~
~ R 1
R `
R R
• R R R i R R i
R R ~
t r r
~ i • t~ i R 7
•R i R
R R i R i n ~'
i i '
~`I}
R i
R ~ ~ ~ Ri4
~+ ~ ~ ~
R
b
~ ~ t
R ~ ~ t
R i _
W
U
R i
~ R
R R R
R ~ R
R
R
R R R
^ ~
R 7' i R ~ R
R R R'
^
f a a
a ~
R * •
R .
: ° x n
R '
R
A R s e
a ' i
~
N R •
'
~`
U
W
~ R R
O '^
v/
R R ~
R
I~
V
W
• R ~+
~
`` N
Q
R
~
R R U
R R
R
~ r "+~
R
~
i ~ r = R
R
F
.,,
_ ~
a R
t ! z
R ~
~
~ X
~
~
~ t o _
~ C~
O
~~
NZ
m
' m~
a
s /~
~ Y.
O
R • ' `` J
`
f
•
~ U ~
~ ~
s
-!
^
'
~
~
N
P N
• STAFF REPORT
Project Manager: Carol Cotter Date: March 9, 2004
Email: ccotter@cstx.gov
Item: Consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for
the Castlegate Section 7 consisting of 24 lots on 31.094 acres located off
Castlegate Drive, southeast of its intersection with Victoria Avenue. (04-
00500051)
Applicant: Wallace Phillips for Greens Prairie Investors, Ltd.
Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat
as submitted.
Item Summary: In accordance with the PDD-H zoning approved in November
2001, the applicant has submitted a Preliminary Plat for Section 7 of Castlegate
Subdivision that will allow for the development of 24 single family homes.
Included in the development are common areas and a greenway area that
encompasses the 100-year flood plain located along the southeast property
boundary.
• The Land Use Plan designates the area as Single Family Residential Medium
Density (3-6 DU/acre). Although the density of this Preliminary Plat is less than 3
DU/acre, Castlegate Subdivision overall meets this density and is in compliance
with the land Use Plan. The Preliminary Plat is also in compliance with the
modified standards approved with the rezoning, including modifications to
standard street widths, sidewalks, lot dimensions, and setbacks.
Sections 7 will take access from Castlegate Drive, which is designated as a
minor collector on the City's Thoroughfare Plan.
This subdivision is located in the Spring Creek Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Area
97-01. Impact Fees will be due at time of final plat. Current fees for this area
are $349.55 per Living Unit Equivalent (LUE).
Item Background: This area was annexed into the city in 1995. Soon after that,
the developer began discussions with the City for the Crowley Master
Development Plan, of which this tract is a part. The Plan was originally approved
by Council in 1997 and then modified in 1998. In 2000, Crowley teamed with
Wallace Phillips to develop the approximately 350-acre portion of the property on
the west side of the future Hwy 40. The initial PDD rezoning request for 162
acres out of the 350-acre, Castlegate Subdivision was quickly followed by a
Master Preliminary Plat for the 350-acre area. This tract was shown as a reserve
• tract in the 2000 Master Preliminary Plat.
• Related Advisory Board Recommendations: The Parks Board approved the
plan for parkland dedication for Castlegate Subdivision in 2000.
Supporting Materials:
1. Location Map
2. Application
3. Infrastructure and Facilities
4. Copy of Preliminary Plat
•
INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES
Water required for plat: Each lot is required to have public water
service, as shown on the plat. Water service will be extended from an
existing 12-inch water line along Castlegate Drive.
Water Service: Water to be provided to each structure, as required.
Sewer required for plat: Each lot is required to have public sewer
service, as shown on the plat. Sewer service will be extended from an
existing 12-inch water line along Castlegate Drive.
Sewer Service: Sewer to be provided to each structure, as required.
Street(s) required for plat: All streets shown on plat are required for
this subdivision.
Streets/Access: Castlegate Drive is a minor collector. Residential
access is precluded on collector streets and larger, where applicable.
Off-site Easements required for plat: None required.
Drainage: Detention for this development was provided by the existing
regional detention facility at SH 6.
Flood Plain: The plat reflects the mapped 100-year floodplain.
Minimum floor elevations have been established for effected lots. The
map for this floodplain did not include a floodway. A hydraulic model of
Spring Creek incorporating the effects of the upstream pond and fill of
the proposed lots in the floodplain has been made a requirement to the
final plat.
Oversize request: None
Impact Fees: The development is located within the Spring Creek
Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Area 97-01. Impact fees for sanitary sewer
will be due at the time of filing the final plat. Currently, the impact fee is
$349.55 per living unit equivalent
Parkland Dedication Fees: Parkland has been dedicated for the
Castlegate Subdivision including Sections 7. Any additional parkland
development fees that may be required will be due at time of final plat.
•
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Q1 ~ P&Z Case No:
Date Submitted: a 'a 3 - 0
•
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION
(check one) [Preliminary Plat ^ Master Preliminary Plat
The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for Planning 8~ Zoning
Commission consideration.
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
[~ Filing Fee of $400.
Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations - $100 (if applicable)
~ Application completed in full.
[v]im Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A revised mylar original must be submitted after staff review.)
^ ,,,,One (1) copy of the approved Master Development Plan or Master Preliminary Plat if applicable.
A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
d Rezoning Application if zone change is proposed.
~J Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of
~~u-, c t u~•~td'
~ ~
~
I -
NAME O SUBDIVISION
•
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION N• o~ Giree.Y-S Prturi~e ~. I~Sfof t~rol~t~ SL}gU
OJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project):
APPLICANT/PR
n
Name ~,d,~X~Q ~~~ ~1~5 E-Mail ' -
Street Address ~ ~ .u ~~ 1edlt~. ,~
City ~ State ~ Zip Code 7~~
Phone Number - Fax Number ~~1~~~~=(0~~
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: (ALL owners must be identified . Please attach an additional sheet for
multiple o ers):
~. - E-Mail
Name L~P.Y1S rL'CI rl P_ Y'~
~7~
Street Address ~'D CQ4,-~~Q.ot4~. Y~-'I~V'~
City ~~~PA~~Q~1i8~/1 State ~ Zip Code ~~
Phone Number ,.;~~~ (e90- 725(7 Fax Number ~~ tP~O -/O~
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name ~~ ~~ ~,~_ T~P~CGOfrI E-Mail ~ L
pP ~~~~ ~ T ~ ~ ~CCOVI •yl~
Street Address ~~(Z~.
I
,
P_OlP ~fi~l7lfltn State "~C
City ~ ~
• Zip Code ~~t<~
Phone Number ~Q~ 7~P4 -`774-~ Fax Number ~ 6 - `77
1-Aug-02 1 of 4
~1~/PYT~
• Total Acres Of Subdivision 3I.0~~-- R-O-W Acreage 3.osD
•
Number Of Lots By Zoning District ~ / ~7 _ f~'
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
r~ ISM I I I
Floodplain Acreage ~,1 ~ rr~ S
Parkland dedication by acreage or fee?
A statement addressing any differences between the preliminary plat and approved master development plan
and/or master preliminary plat (if applicable): ~ Pr
Requested variances to subdivision regulations ~ reason for same -I~ ~ovt~nol
Requested oversize partiapation irl~.
Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
ACREAGE:
# of Acxes to be dedicated
# of acxes in detention
C~~
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
# of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $
(date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board
# of acres in floodplain
# of acres in greenways
The applicant has pr+epansd this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached
hereto aro true and correct. The undersigned hereby n3quests approval by the City of College Station of the
above identified plat and attests that all respective owners have been ident~ed on this application.
• •..
ignature and Title
~ tea" ~y
Date
Total # Of Lots _ 21.~-
/-Aug-02 2 0( 4
•
AGENDA ITEM N0.4
Absence Requests
C7
City of College Station
Absence Request. Form
For Elected and Appointed Officers
Name ~~,~~it/ IN//~<liyYl ~
i
Request Submitted on CJ
I will not be in attendance at the meeting of Cl ~ ~C~
for the reason(s) specified: (Date
•
/~-~~,5
Signature
•
This request shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board one-week
prior to meeting date.
•
AGENDA ITEM N0.6
Vacating Plat & Final Plat
n
Indian Lakes Subdivision Phase I
•
i~
.`;
1
~~.
z
,n~
.>{i.•'1
A
i ~~
•.Y ~ ~1 ~1
~'u
A ~
• J ~
Q
Z
~ n.
•
•
~ ,
__ __ ~
1
. ~
~ ti
. ~ • O
. __ __.. ~
_ ...
_. ~ to
:.
~ ,
~ __ __
., _
.,.
. ~ ..
• ,,
_._ ~'
i :...: x .......
-_ ~ __
. ~ ~~ r ': ~ ~.: '_.
..'
y~. ~ ~~ _ -- i 4.
,.:
^'t--', _
Y
;~ - ~ g
~ ._
,~ ;,-,~.,T..
1 „ ~~L...
... '`~~' ---~ ~ r--~ Z
~~~ i \ o
-- -.•~
;~ ~ /
i~ ~...__._.___ i...r=
~ ~~~ . 1 // ~.. _ .L
`__ t_ _1__...__~ ~ i
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
`~
f
/ y
.
r. ~=~~ .
• ~W
~/~
m a
~` oO
,.,~ ~~ O W
~~
U~
.s`~
.~ •~
•
MEMORANDUM
March 9, 2004
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Spencer Thompson
Email: sthompson@cstx.gov
SUBJECT: VACATING and FINAL PLAT for INDIAN LAKES SUB PH 1
Item: Consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Vacating Plat and
Final Plat for the Indian Lakes Subdivision Phase I consisting of 85 lots on 400
acres generally located at the south end of Arrington Road in the City's ETJ.
Applicant: Paul Clarke, Owner/ Developer
Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Vacating Plat and
• Final Plat as submitted.
Item Summary: This first item is for the consideration of a Vacating Plat in order
to vacate the original Indian Lakes Subdivision Phase I plat. This is the easiest
way to erase property lines, rights-of--way, and easements from the original plat.
The following item is a Final Plat to establish lot lines and easements in a similar
manner to the previous plat with some minor changes. Some lots were
eliminated and some reconfigured. Lots along Arapaho Ridge have been
reconfigured to allow 100-ft of frontage along ROW and then "neck-down".
Comprehensive Plan Considerations:
Land Use Plan: Shown as Rural.
Thoroughfare Plan: The East/VNest arterial is shown on the plat. The arterial
street section is not being constructed at this time but the ROW is being
dedicated.
Parkland Dedication: N/A in ETJ.
Budgetary & Financial Summary: None
Attachments:
1. Area map
2. Application
• 3. Copy of Plat
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
P8Z Case No.: ~' ' 4~
Date Submitted: '
~.
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
(Check one) ^ Amending ^ Final ®Vacating ^ Replat
(x300.00) (x400.00) (3400.00) (x600.00)•
`Includes public hearing fee
The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for PbZ Commission
consideration.
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
® Final plat review and filing fee (see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets ~ $55.00 per additional sheet
N/A Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations ~ $100 (if applicable)
N/A Development permit fee of $200.00 (if applicable).
N/A Infrastructure inspection fee of $600.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed)
® Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.)
® One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and/or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable).
® Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D.
® A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
Nl A Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (ff applicable).
A Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks 8~ Rekxeation Board, please provide proof of
OF SUBDIVISION INDIAN LAKES SUBDIVISION. PHASE ONE
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot 8~ Block) J. M. Bamera Survev. A-69: Brazos
County. Texas 401.03 Acre tract
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project):
Name Paul J. Clarice. Manaoer of Smilino
Development. Ltd. Street Address
City Brvan State TX Zip Code 77802
Phone Number 979.846.4384 Fax Number 979.846.1461
CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: L owners must be identified. Please attach an
additional sheet, if necessary)
Name (See attached sheet) E-Mail
Street Address __
City
Phone Number
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Fax Number
Zip Code
Name McClure Enoineerino. Inc. E-Mail mikem[a~tca.net
'I~~~ t Address 1008 Woodcreek Drive
Colle~le Station State TX Zip Code 77845
State
Phone Number 979.693.3838 Fax Number 979.693.2554
85
Acxeage Total Property 399.08 acres Total # Of Lots .S6r R-O-W Acreage 30.16 acres
sting Use: Vacant Proposed Use: Residential
umber Of Lots By Zoning District N/A -ETJ
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: N/A /ETJ
Floodplain Acreage 0.09 acres
A Statement Addressing Any Differences Between The Final Plat And Approved Master Development Plan
And/Or Preliminary Plat (If Applicable):
(Please see attached sheet)
Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations 8~ Reason For Same: N/A
Requested Oversize Participation: N/A
ETJ CONSTRUCTION
Total Linear Footage of
Proposed Public:
N/A Streets
N/A Sidewalks
N/A Sanitary Sewer Lines
N/A Water Lines
N/A Channels
N/A Storm Sewers
N/A Bike Lanes /Paths
Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
ACREAGE:
N/A # of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee
N/A # of acxes in floodplain
N/A # of acres in detention
N/A # of acres in greenways
OR
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
N/A # of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $
N/A # of Multi-Family Dwelling Units X $452 = $
N/A (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Hoard
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certfies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached
hereto are true, con~ect and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College
Station of the above,idend~ied Bna/ plat and attests that this request does not amend any covenants or
restrictions associated with this plat.
Sign ure and 1Je Fko%r~~e~yQ,z.
•
a ~/e~
Date
•
AGENDA ITEM N0.7
Replat
Herman F. Krenek Phase II
~ '
~ ~ '~a
~
_ o a ~
~,~° ~ ~ ~a~ 1 ~
a a
`~ A
r r1' h
t~`
~6 4f ,~
~o ,
.S{
,n
~
.,. = .,
b
h ~ 1
rig,,, o ,
~
~V'' h -~ is .~
~ a
~
f~~r
~ ~
~ Ri h
~ IM1~ ~ ~.~ 'jam ~
/06
` ~
m ~~y~~'
b
°~ .~ ~~h
r 1~ t
~ Intl Ifl G~~'GP
~w ~ of ,~
P
a
1
w .-
Q
~
zf !
' ~; ~ ~ ~
~ ~ z J ge~~_
oe- ,t`' ~~ ~ - ~ ~
~,
c - -, O
^
~ ~ ' ~j p ~ .,
R G0~ g
, o stY 'A ~
ls,~
Ip
a _
J
~ am
~
~
Q P
`~' ^' ~
q
~
~ ~'
~ ~' -
~6T~
~
, s ~ ~
eQ .~
~ ~~ `
~
Y
1 Q
~
~
h ~ ttpp~ ~ 1
~
~~ J
~ r-
t 1 ..
O
S;
~ ~ d6 ~ N ~
~
~
~6
,p~
1 h
~ ~ ti ~~$~'V
n
_
b
p~
~
~
r ~ ^~ h h
U
h ~ ~
~ ~ r-~
h - -
'1~~
a
T J-
- ~ :
~ ~ ~ W
, ~ ~
h -a h ~
;.. o .~I\
`
f~f4ti~`` '~ii's'i€i'~ ' ~~
.
' \e
~
(v
~~~'
~ ~ ~
1
LL
i-t h
~ ~ ~• Q 2 ~ ~- Q W
'~ fi
~ e ~ i
h
Ih
~ cr
~ ~ 9 ~ m1r
\ ~ ~ \
b /- "'~
h rp -i
-
b h \
" ~
~ h
h ~
h h\ ~
4. .ry
e - Ri '~
~
^~
~
a
,~
~ ~
,,,
h
e ~ ~ .' h
~ -
h
ti ~
h b
~..~
~
~ ^
h
~ - ^ b
^ b
~ ~ \ ~-
X
~
I
W W
~ ~
m
o ~ -bf'!
!
~
ux
°j - ~ 3N N
N
ldld
r rots
~
Z
~W
~ r
(~ U 2 ~,
-
~
• a
Q Y h
4- ~;~
~. - ,~
o
`~ '
~ - -
~~ ,~
_°'' ""
h J
ra
d
"''
r ~ Q; !t - •~ U G
~
~
MEMORANDUM
March 10, 2004
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Carol Cotter
Email: ccotter@cstx.gov
SUBJECT: REPEAT for HERMAN F KRENEK PHASE II
Item: Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Replat for Herman F
Krenek Phase II consisting of 2 lots on 2.94 acres generally located off Texas
Avenue and Brentwood Drive. (04-00500045)
Applicant: Steve Duncan, agent for Owner
Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Replat as
• submitted.
Item Summary: This item is for the consideration of a Replat of Lot 5 of the
Herman Krenek Subdivision Phase II. This Replat divides the existing 2.94-acre
lot into two equal acreage lots. The lots are located behind Discount Tire and
Epicures and are accessible by a private access drive between the two
businesses. The private access easement will be extended through Lot 5A to
Lot 5B with this Replat.
Comprehensive Plan Considerations: Although the Land Use Plan shows this
property to be planned for high density residential use, the current zoning of the
property is C-1, General Commercial. The planned use for one of the Lots is for
a hotel which is a permitted use in C-1.
The property has access to Texas Avenue by way of a private access drive.
Texas Avenue is classified as a Major Arterial on the City's Thoroughfare Plan.
A public water main will be extended to Lot 5B as part of this Replat.
Budgetary & Financial Summary: NA
Attachments:
1. Area map
2. Application
3. Copy of Plat on wall of Council Chambers
FOR OFFICE I~SE ONtLtY
n ~ ~~ P8Z CASE NO.: (~ `(1T~
v1 ~i
DATE SUBMITTED: ~ ~~
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
(Check one) ^ Minor ^ Amending ^ Final ^ Vacating ® Replat
(;300.00) (;300.00) (;400.00) (;400.00) (;600.00)`
•Indudes public hearing fee
The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P8Z Commission consideration.
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
~ Filing Fee (see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets - $55.00 per additional sheet
Na Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations ~ $100 (if applicable)
~ Development Permit Application Fee of $200.00 (if applicable).
Na Infrastructure Inspection Fee of $600.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed)
~ Application completed in full.
Na Copy of original deed restrictions/covenants for replats (if applicable).
~ Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.)
Na One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and/or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable).
~ Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D.
~ A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
Na Two (2) copies of public infrastnacture plans associated with this plat (if applicable).
Na Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of
~fte of Preapplication Conference: December 15, 2003
NAME OF SUBDIVISION Herman F. Krenek. Phase II
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (lot 8 Block) Lot 5
(2.937 ac. Vol. 930. P4.653)
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project):
Name Steve E. Duncan. P.E.
Street Address 7020 Coyote Run City Aryan
State Texas Zip Code 77808 E-Mail Address S@dCC~Dkengineering.com
Phone Number (979) 731-8000
Fax Number (979) 731-1500
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name Charies R. & Lucv H. Farrar
Street Address P.O. Box 9 City Monument
State Texas Zip Code 80132 E-Mail Address
Phone Number (719) 488-0986
Fax Number (719) 481-2153
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name Steve E. Duncan
• Street Address 7020 Coyote Run City ~iyan
State Texas Zip Code 77808 E-Mail Address ~Cd~pkenaineerina.oom
Phone Number 1979) 731-8000
Fax Number (979) 731-1500
~~'~ 1 of 1
Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so, please provide the Volume 737 and Page # 778
Acreage ~ Total Property 2.97 Total # Of Lots 2 R-O-W Acreage 0
ttng Use: vacant Proposed Use: hotel
ber Of Lots By Zoning District C-1 /2 / /
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
C-1 / 1.469 /
Floodplain Acreage 0
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and approved Master Plan and/or Preliminary Plat (if
applicable):
Pronerty is subdivided into two (2) 1.47 acre lots and a utility easement and a drainage and access easement are added to
the front lot 5A
Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations & Reason For Same: n/a
Requested Oversize Participation:
Total Linear Footage of
Proposed Public:
0 Streets
0 Sidewalks
0 Sanitary Sewer Lines
390 Water Lines
0 Channels
0 Storm Sewers
0 Bike Lanes /Paths
Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
ACREAGE: n/a
# of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee
# of acres in floodplain
# of acres in detention
# of acres in greenways
OR
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
# of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $
(date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and cert~es that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true,
correct, and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above-ident~ed
- final plat and attests that this request does not amend any covenants or restrictions associated with this plat.
Signature and Title
•
t
Date
~~ 3ID3 2 of 2
•
AGENDA ITEM NO. B
Replat
University Preserve Subdivision
•
\ l~P ` ~ ~Zf ~ ~ 9
~ q Q
bQ ~ J~Q \
~;
LL
o ~, r
} ~ 6 b 'it
a• ~ ~' F ~ yG~~ 4:
~ ~ ~ o ~'' 1
N ''° ~ ~ q 'Jb,
~N~ h ~ 1,
~i a ~„~,
,Q ~ ~ s"~'L Z io '~.
- 'Q`~ h m' Ir
r ,I~ t ~ gi~Sd
-, h.
~; J ~ ~, \ p
~
\
lai
` ~
~
^
ti
~
\ ~ ~ \
~
~
h ^\
Q
`
7
~
~ =
i.
J1\, ~
may}
~R ~' -
h
~ MI
~ h
\S\ ~ O ~
ti~ b
~ "\
h
_
V ~
w
e~ s\~ \ q \\ '~ h ~ ~ V ~ S` b ~ Q' ~ V
~~ \~ a ~ y 0 \~ h \ `~' ~ ~, ~ h ~' l
.~ • ? • ~~ a\~ h \~ h ~ h "7 h ~~ ~n
Q` q
h n
' 'y '~ f
b
' ~ ~
~
\\+~V ly, ~~ ~ a
b
\` P ~- to .~'r y $ ~ ~ n'
I ~ ,Y
.'I
.-
i
I
p ,
L/Y/~~
i
b
h O
q
b ~i
h
W
b
\
l
~
I
H. h b
~ ~ \
q
' '•
i
.
w , i qty • b
I h ,\.Z. b
\
b \\ p
h
`~ ~
'
\
\ \\~
V ~ b
~ ~
!!
~-
~ h
W
'~ ~
b
~• b Q ~ , q
~ C ^ \
~
V
p
e W
Na
ti ~~
b 3 _
\ ~ Ap ~ ~
g + 7~
as P' _ \ N
~ h ~ ~ca- J
,
h ,~, .. F
~ ~ a ~~ ~ ~ h ~
h ^ S sTK
~
a
b
~ b ~ ~
~ ~ J
4
" aj h
U
~
_
1 V
M h
~ ~
A ~ ~ _ rV
~ ~ a
M N
~ ~ h
~ ~ ~
J ~ ~~
e
\
~ ~~ \1'P ~ K
~ U
~_
~
W P _ \ b
\
' ~ ~U' ~ W
b ~F Oj h \\
n
\ ! "'1 ~t /
m
+
a m
w ~ ^ t ~ ~ e
\ ~ h L
r
J h h " ' h \\+ ~ q
b
\ ~
h
-
d~
; m ~QO R ~Z
b
~
~
` =
N
'°
F
~. b
~~ ,.
~
=
~ ~ ~
b ~ b ~ ~
C9 ~
yy~ „ ~ ` ~b~J ~O
~
h J ~
~J.~
J. q J
ti Q ~ ` 'L „ ~ O
~ ~ b ` , ~
-
h -, - o 3r v b
- ~
=o.. .~ ~~
Q\
~~ ~
7 1~ +
b ~
1
+
T h
~ ~ L~ `
\ `\ r ~ q ,
~ \ `
\h ~
b ,
MEMORANDUM
March 10, 2004
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Spencer Thompson
Email: shompson@cstx.gov
SUBJECT: REPEAT for UNIVERSITY PRESERVE SUBDIVISION
Item: Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Replat for the University
Preserve Subdivision (save and except Lots 14R and 15R) consisting of 25 residential lots
on 11.5 acres generally located at 1207 Munson.
Applicant: Switzer Deacon, Owner/ Developer
Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Replat as submitted.
• Item Summary: This item is for the consideration of a replat of a portion of the University
Preserve Subdivision. This replat creates two additional new lots. Lot 1, a 2/3-acre lot, is
being subdivided into 2, 1/3-acre lots. Lot 7, a 0.57 acre lot, is being subdivided into a
0.29-acre lot and 0.28-acre lot with minor shifts in lot lines in Block 2, Lots 8 through 12.
The entire subdivision ranges from lots of 0.275-acres (11,980 sgft) to 0.531-acres
(23,130 sgft). Minimum lot size for R-1 zoning is 5,000 sgft (0.115-acres). The previous
average lot size within the replat area was 0.382-acres (16,638 sgft). The replat would
create an average lot size of 0.353-acres (15,362 sgft).
This plat falls under Section 18 of the Subdivision Regulations Platting in Older
Subdivisions. This applies to areas within the City that were platted before 1970. Section
18 was recently amended by ordinance (No. 2698) to allow two additional lots in the
University Preserve Subdivision.
Comprehensive Plan Considerations:
Land Use Plan: Shown as single-family residential, low density.
Thoroughfare Plan: Francis is a Minor Collector and Deacon is a Major Collector.
Parkland Dedication: If approved, the Developer will owe the parkland fee in lieu of land
dedication and the development fee for the two newly created lots.
Attachments:
1. Area map
2.. Application
3. Copy of Plat on wall of Council Chambers
~~~.Q~ FOR OFFICE U E ONLY
~ PBZCASENO.: D~
~~
DATE SUBMITTED: ~-~~-~
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
(Check one) ^ Minor ^ Amending ^ Final ^ Vacating Replat
(tl~oo.ooi tt3ooo0) (>raoo.oo) (iaooool oo~*
'Includes q,bRc hearing fee
The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P8Z Commission consideration.
J MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
V Filing Fee (see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets - $55.00 per additional sheet
,~ Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations ~ $100 (if applicable)
~ Development Permit Application Fee of $200.00 (if applicable).
Infrastnrcture Inspection Fee of $600.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed)
Application completed in full.
Copy of original deed restrictions/oovenants for replats (if applicable).
Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.)
One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and/or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable).
Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D.
A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat rri applicable).
Paridand Dedication requirement approved by the Parks ~ Recxeation Board, please provide proof of
of Preapplication Conference:
NAME OF SUBDMSION University Preserve
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDNISION (Lot ~ Block)
Lot 1, Block 1 and Lots 7 -12, Block 2
APPUCANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S ~VFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project):
Name Sv~er Damson. Cnak Financial Services, Inc.
Street Address 2706 Pinehurst City Bryan
State TX ZQ Code 77802 E-Mail Address
Phone Number 979-575-6248 Fax 979-7741156
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name Same as above.
Street Address
Shdte Z~ Code
Phone Number
E-Mail Address
Fax Number
City
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name J. Dale Browne, Jr., P.EJAsh ~ Browne Engineering, Inc.
Street Address 505 University Drive E.. Suite 803 City Colleoe Station
State TX Zip Code 77840
Phone Number 978-846-6914
s~t~
E-AAail Address
Fax Number 879-846-8914
lof6
Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? ff so, please provide the Volume
Acreage -Total Property 2.8~
~ Use: Residential
and Page #
R-O-W Acreage ~-
proposed Use: Residential
~mber Of Lots By Zoning District 8 / R1
rage Acreage Of F~ch Residential Lot By Zoning District:
0.312 / R1 /
Fkadplain Acreage None
Total # Of Lots 9
A statement addressing any differences between the Final Plat and approved Master Plan and/or Preliminary Plat (if
applicable):
Not applicable.
Requested Variances To Subdivisbn Regulations $ Reason For Same: Not applicable.
Requested Oversize Participation: Not applicable.
Total Linear Footage of
Proposed Public:
~_ Streets
Sidewalks
Sanitary Sewer Lines
~_ Water Lines
~_ Channels
_Q_ Storm Sewers
-~,Z. Bike Lanes /Paths
Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
ACREAGE:
I O # of acres to be dedicated + $ b development fee
_,Q_ # of acres in floodplain
_~ # of aches in detention
C~ # of acres in gnrenways
OR
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
_~ # of Single-Famiy Dwelling Units X $556 = a ~, LIZ.~~
(date) Approved by Parks 8~ Recreation Boani
NOTE: DIGRAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMRTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this applicatron and certifies that the fads stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are
bue, correct and oomp/ete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above-
ialenbfied final plat and attests that this request does not amend any oov~enants or restrictions associat+e~d with this plat.
Z /b D
re and Title Date
•
•
AGENDA ITEM N0.9
C,
Rezoning
Castlegate Subdivision Phase 6
Z_
2
N
W
w
v
RR RR
R RaR,~
R ion
R R R a
a _
R a R R
• R R
1 R
= C_
^
~
0
R R a
R R a t
q a
R a
a
a
R
R R
R
~i 1
a Y
R a
=
O R R
R R RR R
R t R ~ =
a
O
b
~
a asa
R R R R a R R i
R R p R
~
~~ U
R
R a a a R R
a
~ R
RR
i R + si `
`
R a a
R a _
~
~
R ~
S
`
` 0
t
R
R
R
~
R
R
R R R^ ~
~ ~ ~
``
R a R a ^ „ x
6~j`,
f ~
R
a s R_ R
R ~
' o ~.~ ~ ~ Y `
' ~ m
a R ~ a R R ~ '~
r
a _ _
z
a
#'
~ '
~
+~ R i.~.s;
~
' r/~. f
~.f'.~..... ~~,
4 :i4~" " ~ l '
•~ _R R '
R
.
~ ~'/A~
vI
a '
~i ~h~~9 .~~%~'.~. ';L~
~ ~ : i.~i.~.'rb'
i ~~ '
R a ' ,~
R
R ' ^ R
' .
R
R
• '
~ S
a ``b R
R
R p
~ d a ~ a
r F
z
a ^
~ t
`
E- W
~ ~ a
a =~
~, G ~
~
p Z
~ m~
e
< ~o
~ a
VO
• ~ o
~ U~
~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~
• STAFF REPORT
Project Manager: Jennifer Reeves Date: 03-04-04
Email: jreeves@cstx.gov
Item: Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Rezoning for Phase 6
of the Castlegate Subdivision from A-O Agricultural Open to PDD Planned
Development District, consisting of 10.80 acres generally located on the north
side of Greens Prairie Road, just west of Castlegate Drive.
Applicant: Greens Prairie Investors, Ltd.
Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the zone request as
submitted.
Item Summary: The proposed Planned Development District is for a single
family integrated residential community with amenities that provide for an
enhanced quality of life. The PDD District is the only available district that
provides for the meritorious modifications of the regulations that allows for the
developer to continue the development as it was originally envisioned and
implemented in the previous Sections 1-5 of the Castlegate Subdivision.
• The Design Review Board will be reviewing the concept plan with the meritorious
modifications on March 26th.
The property to the south and west is zoned A-O, Agricultural Open, and
undeveloped. The property to the north and east is Castlegate Subdivision that is
already zoned PDD and under construction.
Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan shows the subject
area as medium density single family residential (3-6 dwelling units per acre).
The Master Development Plan shows residential development for the area with a
density of 3-4 dwelling units per acre. The proposed single family housing is in
compliance with the Land Use Plan, thus staff is recommending approval of the
zone change.
Item Background: This area was annexed into the City of College Station city
limits in 1995, and is currently not platted.
Related Advisory Board Recommendations: The proposed concept plan will
go to the (DRB) Design Review Board for approval of design standards once the
zoning is in place.
The Parks Board has previously approved the Castlegate Master Plan for
• parkland dedication.
Rwn.rRwurnwROOiPZZOawoooss~ ~.noc
Created on 3/~i/20041:17 PM
• The developer has also worked with the Greenways Program Manager to finalize
plans for dedicating a 5.3-acre greenway area in another portion of Castlegate.
Commission Action Options: The Commission acts as a recommending body
on the question of rezoning, which will be ultimately decided by City Council.
The Commission options are:
1. Recommend approval of rezoning as submitted;;
2. Recommend denial;
3. Table indefinitely; or,
4. Defer action to a specified date.
Supporting Materials:
1. Location Map
2. Application
3. Infrastructure and Facilities
4. Purpose and Intent Statement
C7
•
Rwnrnwurnw 311.DOC
Geated on 3/x/20041:17 PM
INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES
Water: There is an existing 12" water main on the south side of Castlegate
Drive. The development of Section 5 of Castlegate will bring an 8" water line to
the property.
Sewer: There is an existing 12" sewer main on the south side of Castlegate
Drive. The development of Section 5 of Castlegate will bring an 8" sewer line to
the property.
Streets: Greens Prairie Road is a minor arterial.
Off-site Easements: Could be required if this Phase develops before Phase 5 of
Castlegate.
Drainage: Drainage will be to Spring Creek. A regional detention pond was
constructed to offset post-development drainage impacts to downstream areas.
Flood Plain: The limits of the detailed study by FEMA stop just north of this
tract.
Oversize request: None requested at this time.
Impact Fees: The property is located in the Spring Creek Sewer Impact Fee
Area (97-01). Impact fees will be due at time of Plat.
•
NOTIFICATION:
Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle; 03-02-04 and 03-23-04
Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 03-18-04
Advertised Council Hearing Dates: 04-08-04
Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': 28
Response Received: None as of date of staff report
~J
R:WTLTRI PZLTRI PRODI PZ20041 f'0009311.DOC
Cleated on 3/4/2004 1:17 PM
a,.a-~ FOR OFFICE U~ONLY
CASE NO. 0~aa'..~~~
DATE SUBMITTED o~'ac3'~'
ZONING MAP AMEND ENT (REZONING)
FOR PDD / P-MUD
~DD o P-MUD
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shall not be filed within
a period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with permission of the Planning & Zoning Commission or
City Council. The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for consideration:
/ Application completed in full.
$500.00 application fee.
/ Two (2) copies of a fully dimensioned map on 24" x 36" paper showing:
a. Land affected;
b. Legal description of area of proposed change;
c. Present zoning;
d. Zoning classification of all abutting land; and
e. All public and private rights-of-way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land.
~',~ Written legal description of subject property (metes & bounds or lot & block of subdivision, whichever is
applicable).
The attached Rezoning Supporting Information sheet completed in full.
Date of Required Preapplication Conference: t~~A
~PLICANT'S INFORMATION: _
Name(s) ~arP~_YIS ~LLiY(,
Street Address ~Q_~LLS~
City
State ~ Zip Code ~~S~S E-Mail Address '- ~
Phone Number ~q~4, ~`lD - 7ZS0 Fax Number ~g7q)1Q~0 - /D~~
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name(s) larePylS ~'Gtirle ~
Street Address cZ te. City ~((~~ ~~tfic7~7
State ~_ Zip Code E-Mail Address -'
Phone Number ~`-~9,J ~o~D -7ZSU Fax Number f'~ 1'7q, f'o~~ -/D~
This property was conveyed to owner by deed, dated ~-/ 7- ZGIQO and recorded in Volume 3'~O 5
Page _ ~S of the Brazos County Deed Records.
General Location of Property:
.,
t
Address of Property: t10VIP~
Legal Description: ~~f'o~~ Sfrel/P.hS~ Sl.~,f JP..~(. ~- 5 4'
Total Acreage: ~~[Ll1p („~r~.e,S
Existing Zoning: A- -0 Requested Zoning: f ~~
sent Use of Property: QDl rj ~'fN,~~
posed Use of Property: ~ r
6/13/03 Page 1 of 2
REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION
1.)
•
2.) maicace wnemer or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not,
3.) List any other reasons to support this zone change.
Please also provide the following information for PDD or P-MUD rezonings:
Statement of purpose and intent of the proposed develAopment: ~'F~ ~ "i -(7~ j ~~r/~d,,~
A list of proposed land uses:
The applicant has prepared this application and supporting information and certifies that the facts stated
herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correct. IF APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE
OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A
POWER OF ATTORNEY STATEMENT FROM THE OWNER.
.,,r ~ r~ /
ignature of owner or ap icant Date
•
x/13/03 Page 2 of 2
List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary.
explainwhy the Plan is incorrect. ~Drti,-~a ~'~jC~v>Gt.p ~•u~.~SfP ~ %n ~or~aYt
•
PDD Rezoning Request -General Bulk or Dimensional Variations Sought
9.896 Acres
Robert Stevenson Survey, A-54
College Station, Brazos County, Texas
Modifications or variations to the City of College Station Standards maybe requested for
the following items:
- Street pavement width for collector and residential streets
- Sidewalk requirements for collector and residential streets
- Building setback line distances
- Minimum lot size and dimensions
C7
•
•
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10
Rezoning
Nantucket Phase 7
r~
u
2
O
Z~
yb
~P
~~G
y~PtQ.
y~'1~ O ~` .. .e ..~
Y w$
~ M ~
3 ~ ^ -.
N _ ~ n '~~
w ~
o ~ ~ z ~""'~ ` a
w ` m w
~ ~ _
•• .. ° ~
~ e ~ Z ~ ~
Q w ~ ~"_ ~ ~. ~ w
J ~ ~
~ w
w ' Z Q Oi ~ w ~t~~ ~
t ~
itl a e ~ m
L a
Jj ~ 4
N
~ tl O
~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~~
~- ~ ~' - N Z
m
a
'~. 4 w _ ~ ~ _ ~' (~ O
~ o
_ _ ~
~ ~ = ~ U~
~:. .w = ~
w N Y7d~dONYS '~ _ r
• STAFF REPORT
Project Manager: Jennifer Prochazka Date: March 9, 2004
Email: jprochazka@cstx.gov
Item: Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a rezoning for
Nantucket Phase 7, consisting of 4.794 acres located south of Nantucket Drive
between State Highway 6 and Harper's Ferry Road from A-O Agricultural Open
to R-1 Single Family Residential.
Applicant: Phyllis Hobson, Nantucket, Ltd, property owner
Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning
Item Summary: The applicant is requesting rezoning in order to develop the
property as single family lots.
The prope is surrounded by developed Nantucket (in the ETJ) to the south,
Fairhaven ~ove, zoned R-1 and developed as single-family housing, to the
southwest, and undeveloped property zoned A-O, but shown on the Land Use
Plan as Single-Family Medium Density, to the north and east.
• Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The request is in compliance with the
Land Use Plan, which designates this property as Single Family Residential
Medium Density. Nantucket Drive is shown as a minor collector on the
Thoroughfare Plan.
Item Background: The property was annexed in 2002 and was zoned A-O
Agricultural-Open at that time. This property is in the process of platting. The
property to the east, Faifiaven Cove, was recently rezoned to R-1 and is also in
the process of platting.
Commission Action Options: The Commission acts as a recommending body
on the question of rezoning, which will be ultimately decided by City Council.
The Commission options are:
1. Recommend approval of rezoning as submitted;
2. Recommend a less intense zoning classification;
3. Recommend denial;
4. Table indefinitely; or,
5. Defer action to a specified date.
Supporting Materials:
1. Location Map
2. Application
• 3. Infrastructure and Facilities
• INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES
Water: Currently this area lies within the Wellborn SUD CCN. Domestic
water will be supplied by Wellborn unless the CCN changes before the
subdivision is constructed.
Sewer: City sewer is available to be extended to the area.
Streets: Nantucket Drive is a Minor Collector.
Off-site Easements: Off-site easements may be required to extend
utilities to site.
Drainage: Drainage is toward the lake
Flood Plain: No FEMA floodplain onsite.
Oversize request: None at this time.
Impact Fees: The subdivision is in the 97-02B Sewer Impact Fee Area.
The current fee is $243.38 per Living Unit Equivalent.
NOTIFICATION:
• Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle; 3-02-04 and 3-23-04
Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 3-18-04
Advertised Council Hearing Dates: 4-8-04
Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200':- 23
Response Received: None as of date of staff report
•
//~~, „ n FOR OFFI E US'EPNLY
V~' CASE NO. ~~S'Y
GATE SUBMITTED '~
•
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING) APPLICATION
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shall not be filed within
a period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with permission of the Planning 8 Zoning Commission or
City Council. The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for consideration:
/ Application completed in full.
~ $500.00 application fee
~~ Two (2) copies of a fully dimensioned map on 24" x 36" paper showing:
a. Land affected;
b. Legal description of area of proposed change;
c. Present zoning;
d. Zoning classification of all abutting land; and
e. All public and private rights-of-way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land.
/ Written legal description of subject property (metes 8 bounds or lot & block of subdivision, whichever is
applicable).
/ The Rezoning Suaporting Information sheet completed in full.
Date of Required Preapplication Conference: ~~-~ibu ~i _ 7~3
APPLICANT'S INFORMATION:
•
Name
Street
City (a~ I ~~ aP ~Q-~-i e,~, State Zip Code ~~L~ (~
E-Mail Address ~I~s P iora~~a~+dr~~n .Goer,
Phone Number
Number ~=0~~ 5 Z.
PROPERTY OAW/N- ER'S INFORMATION:
Name 1 ~.In~'~M.~e~' , L~'G} .
Street Address 110( lanivpr4n"~
City ('~ ~ .P~~ ~sl'a ~~tr~ Sta
E-MailAddres~ e~-,w(~iSC~bha~x(~...a~~l~
Phone Number
This property was conveyed to owner by deed
Page of the Brazos County Deed Record
General Location of Property:,
_Fax Number ~L~o - (Yo S L
dated ~-~S and recorded in Volume ,
s. 8 7~ Z voj. s31, ~ ~ 7 ~
. 1113 vni.`f~'2-~.. ~~ ,.. ~ .1 __ ~_ r T
1 _ 1
Address of Property: ~~t.y~.~~l"~\V~i
Legal Description: fee Q,.~a~ W~P-~S ~ ~tiltirn~S
Acreage -Total Property: ~- .1q ¢-
Existing Zoning: lac -O Proposed Zoning: R.-I Si-~o~ ~aw~I ~ ~Si~Q1f i4
resent Use of Property:~q,h~
Proposed Use of Property: ~~ V ~~y~y ~,, ~~jd~,~`Gt~
6/13/03 Faye 1 of 2
~S~ ~~
to ~ Zip Code _ _~T~f7
REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION
~~
~J
2.) Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance•with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not,
explain why the Plan is incorrect.
~3.) List any other reasons to support this zone change.
Co
~Y~.p~~? ~~1~iVi~irm . ~
The applicant has prepared this application and supporting information and cert~es that the facfs
stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correct. IF APPLICATION IS FILED BY
ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, APPLICATION MUST BE
ACCOMPANIED BY A POWER OF ATTORNEY STATEMENT FROM THE OWNER.
Si u e of o er (or agent) or applicant
2 ~3
Date
6/13/03 Page 2 of 2
1.) List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change
necessary.
•
AGENDA ITEM NO. 11
Amendment to the UDO
Article 2 and Article 5
~~
;=
i
t
t~~f
•~
w
~~
~ N
- ~ r
.. t
_ ~
,E x"
. a..""'
~,.
r
t _ '~
* _ + /A
/
~
cif .. ~ ~
_
_
~
= t,
^
' ~ O
N
~
, ~
~
= '
'
,
W
~ a
e e ~y
Y~
'~•.
^
._ ~ y
.' ~i
t - - a
- - _ ~G
d'
O
E w c3
t
~ l'
^
~
_ ~~ ~ ~
°
..
~ R
r' E
E U
a
t ~ _~
~ ~
~ a
M
~ '' '
t w
. .
.• ~ o
, , a
• s
~ F
Q-
~
~ ~~ W
,
~ ~
~ ~ ~
:._ ._. . ~ ~ ~ Y
4rt ~ ~ ~ ~ ` , ~•
• ~'~
t e~
x
i w
k ~~ «o u
• '• a
~ ~ g
4 `'
~ a ,p w
~ ~
r ' ~
w ~ ~ ~ w
~'
., ~ .~ ; ~;
.~ ~ n
~~
. N ;u ~ .
4 '
' A ~
•
~i~
~ • ~
' ~ N
Y
~~ ' e
~ _ X
~3
~~
~~ ~_
'
~ ~
O
~~
_
t ~
~
;~ N
~
~ - _
O
,_
¢ ~
~ V
~J
~
"
. ~ U~
~
~i
w „~
4
~~
~
•
Maroh 10, 2004
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM: Jane R Kee, City Planner
RE: Property along Krenek Tap Road
As you know, the City of College Station will be developing a municipal complex on the south
side of Krenek Tap Road over the next many years. The land acquisition and the initial phase of
construction were approved by voters in two separate bond elections. The City Council wishes to
create a sense of place and identity for the City, not only on the municipal property but along
• Krenek Tap Road itself.
An overlay zoning district is being proposed that will address the views along Krenek as
properties develop in the future. The overlay addresses the front fagades of structures and does
not allow parking to be seen along the Krenek Tap frontage. Existing zoning remains in place
and all existing uses will still be permitted with the exception that duplexes will not be permitted
along the corridor.
Letters to all individual property owners within the overlay were sent and there have been a
couple of inquiries. The actual application of the overlay will come before the PBcZ at a future
meeting.
Sincerely,
Jane Kee, AICP
' Planner, City of College Station
Attached: Draft Overlay regulations
Area Map
r~
. ORDINANCE NO.
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 3
That Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 2.4.D.2 Design Review
Board "Powers and Duties" of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College
Station, Texas, is hereby amended to read as follows:
2. Design District and Overlay District Review
The Design Review Board shall approve or deny building and sign materials
and colors in any designated design district, and shall approve or deny
alternate building or fence materials and fence height in the Krenek Overlay
District, as specified within this UDO.
That Chapter 12, "Unified Development Ordinance," Section 5.8, "Overlay Districts,"
of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby. amended
by adding Section 5.8.C., "Krenek OveNay" to read as follows:
C. Krenek Tap Corridor Overlay District (KO)
•
The purpose of this overlay is to provide for consistent development of office,
retail, and residential uses in the area of the new City Centre Complex. The
City Centre Complex is located on the south side of Krenek Tap Road, and
will contain several municipal and public facilities having high quality urban
design characteristics. This overlay, along with all other applicable
requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), shall apply to all
properties on the north and south sides of Krenek Tap Road.
Uses:
Permitted uses shall be those as established in the underlying zoning districts
with the exception that duplex dwelling units are not allowed anywhere in the
overlay district.
Design Standards:
The following standards apply to all development, except single family
residential development, along the Krenek Tap Corridor in addition to other
design standards contained within the UDO.
1. Parking:
No parking or circulation aisle shall be located between a building and the
adjoining right-of--way of Krenek Tap Road. Where no building exists and
• parking is to be installed adjacent to aright-of--way, there shall be a 30'
setback from the right of way line to the parking pavement, within which
Jib:IdeNS serJ/anelcttyandrl0?-?0-0f or~damendnkn~-orate overlayyan.dac
3/?ro!
• ORDINANCE NO. Page 4
a three foot (3') high screen of shrubs, fencing wall or earthen berm shall
be installed.
2. Architectural Design:
All building facades facing Krenek Tap Road shall have architectural
treatments similar and complimentary to the front facade of the building.
All exterior walls visible from the public ROW shall be finished in the
following materials: brick, native stone, cast stone, textured concrete
masonry units, fiber/cement board, solid wood planking, stucco or
synthetic stucco. Metal siding is prohibited on all exterior walls.
Alternative materials may be approved by the Design Review Board, if the
alternative materials meet or exceed the standards of the materials listed
above. There shall be no flat roofs.
3. Reflective Glass:
For non-residential buildings no more than fifty percent (50%) of any
fagade faring Krenek Tap Roadway may include reflective glass. For the
purposes of this ordinance, reflective glass shall be defined as glass
having a reflectance of greater than ten percent (10%).
•
6. Fencing:
Any fencing visible from the public designated roadway or public area shall
be decorative wrought iron or tubular steel, a picket fence or alternative
similar products approved by the Design Review Board. Fences along the
right-of--way shall not exceed four feet (4') in height unless otherwise
allowed by the Design Review Board. The materials and height limitation
referenced above do not apply to fences required for screening as
-specified in this UDO.
4. Sign Regulations:
Only attached building signs and low profile signs meeting the
requirements of the UDO shall be permitted. Building signs shall not
obscure other building elements such as windows, cornices, decorative
details, etc.
Design Standards:
The following standards apply specifically to single family and townhome
residential development along the Krenek Tap Corridor in addition to other
design standards contained within the UDO applicable to single family
development.
i. Front Setback:
Residential lots adjacent to Krenek Tap right of way shall be oriented so
that the front facades of individual units or dwellings face Krenek Tap
Road, if there is sufficient properly frontage to do so. The front setback of
Jsb:ldevr rerym¢Icllycendr102•?0-OI ar[a+nendinnu-craft o-rrla~yandoc
3/LO/
ORDINANCE NO. Page 5
these units shall not exceed fifteen feet (15'). This does not preclude
residential street access to Krenek or pedestrian access.
2. Front porches:
Every front fagade visible from Krenek Tap Road shall contain a front
porch extending along at least one half of the front fagade. These
porches shall be large enough and useable for outdoor seating and not
solely decorative.
3. Parking:
No driveways or locations for parking shall be allowed in the yard areas
facing Krenek Tap Road or along Krenek Tap Road itself. Rear parking and
access shall be required.
4. Architectural Design:
All exterior walls visible from the public ROW shall be finished in the
following materials: brick, native stone, cast stone, textured concrete
masonry units, fiber/cement board, solid wood planking, stucco or
synthetic stucco. Metal siding is prohibited on all exterior walls.
Alternative materials may be approved by the Design Review Board, if the
alternative materials meet or exceed the standards of the materials listed
above. The primary material shall not exceed seventy-five percent (75%)
of the fagade. The fagade calculation excludes windows and doors. There
shall be no flat roofs.
•
Jtb:l~ve xryanelctty andieW?-?0-0~ orc[amendmeM-crate ovrrlayyan.doc
3/?~7I
• •
R ~t ~ ~ ! l ~ ~ r~ ~~
~ l~
~~ ~ ~ ~' i ~ ~t~
fp ~ f ~ ~ ~~~ ~ jf~
~~ ~.,
~~ ~~~
e
~ ~~ ~ ~ ~
:~ ~~ f ~~ ~
~~ ~ ~ ~
~ 8~ ~~
~ <
~D
~~
_°D
Z
Imo`' Z
m
o "~
D
~D
i
~~
I
~~ ~~ I
_ ,~
>~ ~ I
r 1R I
a
N
~~
~- ,.
I
I
~a ~'
I
~
~
~
~~,y~
~
~
~
2
m
;, N ~
8
~ ~ ~
~~
~~
a
~ Z ~
V
~ ~
c
~ .. x a
-~
~~~~~~
~- - - ~ SHEET S -~~`L~ 8HEET 4 - - i - - - - - - b `, ; I
m
.. w I • ~ 7 ~ a ( d~~~~
I I • i I ~ i `~` I
~ I I I I ~ i I
~g I I ~ i ~ I
~ ~ I ~ ~ I • • mow. ~ ~ ~ ~ I m I
I o " ~ ~I
r
I ~ vl Icy ~ a w ~ ~ I
I ~~ I ~ Ia ~ s i
I ~~ I n71 ~ ~ ~ l
-----I-----• I g I ~ ~ ~~ I
I ~ -------- I g • ~ ~ ~ + --
.. ~_ I ~
~~,~
~~ , ,.
a ~ L -
~~ -- --
e I
• w ~ I
~ ° I
.~ ~~~
/ ~ ~a~~
SHEET 7 ~
----------~ S
! ~ ! p ! Y
x >" ;, N ~ ~
pp!!!
r rnp ~ ~~ L L L L
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ v a ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
~ a~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ A a
~ ~~ ~
~
r
~ 1 s.aeay ,~
..m ~y.~~ , ~ Z
. ~w a ~
~
A : D~ KE3
8
~ a
'-
'
_~
~ ~
,
i
es ca.
, ' ' 4'
mow
~~ ~
.
~
~~~~~
~~ ~
~~ A
~~~~ ~
~~~~
~~~
~~ ! ~
~~
,~
~~~~
~n
[3~~
~~~~
~~ ~
~ ~~~~
~t~
~~
a!
~~~'
~r~~
~~~
~~1~
~~~
s
~t
~[[~~
~i~
z
d
z
ror
x~
~~
o~
~ ~'
d
c
0
z
~a
• •
•
~~~ ~~
~#~~~~
i~
!:~
~!
~;
~~
a
~'~
,~,
;~!
~t~
!•
~~
~~~~~~~
a"•[i
~~~~
r~ s!i
~l~~
,~:s a
~!~!~
t~:
~~_~~yy~
~~ R~
~9 ,~~
~~ ;i
~! ~~
(~ !
I
9S !
r
I ~ !a a+~araaa:aza::~ aaaa ~
I~~~ ~~ j rr~rr~r~rr~~~ ~~r~ ;
;~~~~~ ~ ~~ff~~fffff~t l~~f ~
;t~tF~ ~ R~ccR~x~~R;;R c~~
:t ~ ~ srr~rrrrrt t r
... ....••. .tr
~~ a r~r~.jtMR~{rlMM'1'~i M••
~~~ ~ ~~~~t~~~Itrl; t~; x
! ~ 133illliltll; 9~~~ ~
~~i~ra a,
~:~~~~ ~ ~
t~~: r~
t •
~ `' ~ s
•~
~~~;,~ ~ ~
7
r ~{ r ~ ; •
i ! } i
Nr~ ~~ ; ~
Y
~~~~~~~
a~y4R~i ~"~~y~i~*E~~~'
~P~Rt !~ !1(~rtN a
~isKa ~~~laaaRt t
~~«r ~;.~iff;~~~
i t= ~~i~
~ s ;~
frrr ! rrr ;;a
Rs;~~ IS'
`~~~ ~ i~~~~ ~~~
~~~ ; .
~l
: ~!~ ~~'
!!;.
~~ S ~ ! ;
:~ ~ !~! ~
~,
!~ ;~~ ~~;
~k ~~~ ~~'
~~ 1
~~-
~;
~t
t~
s!
~~
i
t~
.•
i~
t~
~!
~~
~~
a
~~
:~
i
is
l
~;R
t
!
!
~~
[~
r
i~
~~
!
•
i
yy:;~.
~~ !
~i
r~ a
!. !
~! ~
L
~~ t
*~E~ jy3$
L~ l
ra
~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~E~~
aMl =iiNNM M Mil ~ N~a `i{
R~ ~ l~gfe$8~~l~ ~xl~ax, l~~~ ~~~~ !
tea #!~~ aaaxaa~ ~ ~i~ as ~~~#a~ ,~ ~ a
~ ; ~#lt~rrtr~~ ~~ rf~~«~ 1~~~~~~¢,i
i
~ ~ ;;'~~~~~~~~~_~~ ~~ #~ ~l~~lai~~li:
t
t t sasaaa 3 a ~t ~ ~.
~ ~ ~~~~_~}~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~1~r#~~~1~~
r ~ q~rrasrrgq r~ r !
I~! ...... ~ QL
• i ~ ~~tll!lli~~x l~ !} :+~j~~ ~~ r
' ~ M
•
!~! !~ !
a t a~ g 1~1~ ~ ~ga~
a '~ ~~ ~~
~D~~~ ;~~E~~:~
N ~ s • ~ I~ ~ ~ M ~; ~~~a
N
~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~g '~~~~
~ ~
•!
±~~!
~F
~'~
!
I
~~~
~~~
~~~
~~~
~~
1np
O fn
4 H
V n
~ n
~i n
~: n
~i n
:~ ly~
6 ws
V nOnq
RV n
~ n
~ er
~ ns
4 l~
Q n
4 n
~ l~
~ P
aI AV
V H
~ N
t~ P
~ N
4 P
~ P
~ P
~ nw
V
Ei
` N
~i nf~
~i ,s
N n
~ ~.
w
$ w
` tnt.~
O tw{.~
V lp.
~i pNp
~i 1~y~.Ppwp
4~"f N
N h
~ tw{.~
6 waa
0 n
~ n
V 1.
~ 1.
~ 1.
r. n
ri n
~ H
v Ai
O n
~ h
~ n` tn,,
V~ 14~.
Vi 1~
~. 1LL~
vi fNy.
N n
.4. 1,n1.
C 1,w1,..
~6 yny
R H
V yny
W n
~ n
* An~
~ I.
~ nN
N n
~ 1,ny~
3 v
b "
4
V `
0 ~
4`i `
+`~ r
4 n
~0 "
•`.
0 rpp
6 n
$ n
V 1p.
$ np
8i op
i n
~i w
~ n
~
* ~ ~
y ` ` ~ V
~ ~ ~
~
~ ~
~
_ ~ ,,
ww
VI
C
#~~~ °- m
~
~~~
~° <
8~~
~
~~~~o o
Z 0
~
r y
2
ws v v ~~ .~i~~~li v s~~ r
•
•
•
,N
~' I
~~ ~
~~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ T. A. HENRY BURVEY, A-129 ~~~ '~~ \ ~ _~
i
°~ °w.' ~ ; E ~' O m
.$ '
w~ Mme"',. 50079'SJ'W ~ (409.94' N00'29'$]-E -40.02' ~ g
_i-star ..-. ~.-..-. T._-..-1_-..-..-_r._-.r -..-..- -.«~»-,ar '---------------------------
eo' rhos accrn~x ~worr ~~
a ~ ~ ~ ~ R ~ LEGEND
-' !I Q
' ' J. M. BARRERA 8URVEY, A-69 ~ I ,.i .,A
/ ~
e ? . ;
~~ ~ a~ ~
,;
_~
' !~ ~ .R
~fi ,~~
I ~ ~~ fi
«. I .!F
i G 'A, .~Q'`? '
i"c' / i
. ` ~ ~ ~ ~ i
~•
I I ~1 ~ ~.~ ' ~ u,
.e " I $$ ; ~ ~ n,
~ }~ /~ Y el i
' i ~ .A ~ '1
t ~
1 ~'~ ~~ ^^
~ I ~ ~ ~~~/~ / ~ s
, N+ i ~ iii //
~ i j l y M ~~~ yy. i i ,~ j N
~ ~ ~ ~
IE~~
e • •
.i b
p ,,,r, ~',.~' i ~ O
~ / ~' I 1 °' / ~ j
r'
_I ~ 1 i ~~` ?~ a~ j~~ a ~ ~ .
~ 0 i ~ I 1 ~~ _ .._......... ~
~~ I I b I ~ 1/ ~ .~' ~'~.. ..~ j I y I I
I 1'
8 I i ~~ ~ ~ _ .... - 8v I i I I i 1
w j 1 ~ 1 aY~ ~ _ ..
/ 1 ! ~ W ~' ,4C`% I .-._ .. _. ...t~.ory,oc) '~ ~~ 1 j I j L~TR~ ~ 1 i,~ ~~
b I
.... r 1 I I - i t
I I I I I I
_.. ..~
" ~ • ~'I
~ ~ ~' ~ / w ~ ~ I I ~ ' I
l ~ i« J
~ ~ ~•
,•
lSaa i '~ 8
P ; ~~ ~~ ~~
,'' ~ ~ cn '
C ~ : pax ~i R~ N~fsa/~Yt ~1 6 ~ ~iil . L~ w 11 ~ I ~~
,~+ C H ~ ~°~ Ij ~ I r ~1! I
z I' z 1
~ii ~ N W I I D XI ! I ~ I.
y I~ o I! 1 i o -~-~
w ` ~ ~ ae~Dr~ I M j ~ j n 1
~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ,~-!- ~r ,_ ~ X1'1 11 ~ 1
• •
•
1
! ~p~ ~ 8 ~
6it ~v ~ ~ ~
a
t~ ~ M
1
Y
'
lS'
N 00'=i'2a'1Y-1lII
w~
ie T. A. HENRY 8URVEY, A-129
.
h
e
-~-n.a
row
~~rrv-ean noousw-aesm Naoaasrs
: -~"r
»e
s .
an a sRr~ so• vlwb nar
~ "~ ~E~~ ~ J. M. BARRERA BURVEY. A~9
~~~
as;
`~
y` ~~ ~~
a ~ o` o`,~
~ ~ ~+ c ~4~' 9H££Y KEY
"11~~
~ :~ ~
~,O a ~~ ~ ~
~ ~~~~
~~
o..
._ ( ~ i
+ ~T •~ 1 t ~ ~ .a i
~ ¢
~' ~'~ ~ ~ ate. ~ ~ ~ ' . i y a
` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ':t,~ ~ ~',' ~~~~•~ ' ~~,~ i ice' i! ~' I
~'' .yes- \\I ~. ~..~• ~'~6 , ~ .~..-• ~,-"~~ ~ ~ -,:/~ 4 ~' ~7
~ ''i55
s . ~~ ~
_ F'_ i b ~
}@, ~ Y ,r ~ i i~ j ! e o, ..e~ ~ ~O ~i I I ~ i I ~7eao'w-+aai i
a~ ~~ 1 F ~~ fg" F '~jl.~'a ~d~~oaP~ '~"* Few ; I ~ ~ -~i8 ~ ~ o-~ ~ ~ ~' c"; I
e i i
j ,a,.
~~ ~,~r~~ j 'kb, m.ir ~
~° a ~ •''~ ~ CAP 11~ ~~~ mar ,~ ~µs 1 I 8 ~ r• ~ r j b~~ ~
4 ~ '~4, c ~ ,F ~~ ~; i cry ~`,.,f~ '•. - ~: ~j +,,}Y.E' i ;'d R~~g^j
~.. ~ !~ 11 i s-.so~~ ~ 9 ~ a~ ~ ~~ '' i v
4 • it I!
,3
~y ^~ ~ ~ I ~
1
i , o ~ ~ + ~aci`a,'
I[p~7 S •~ ~q ~ I P l ! • ~ •. ,~ ~~~f .~/ ~ ~ ~ MATCFILIN[ ~ ~ y,4~F ~ ~ , ' ~~ 4i~
w' ~ ~ ~ V/ ~ ~' ~ ~ 'I / A 174-" 4 NI[ET7 ~ ~ ~
zz ~ ~ ,~ o
~ ~ r ~ 11 I i r ~~~. Ip ~o ~~t~~ ~~ 4 b ,~ ~
Z ~ ~~ f! ~ Wer ~ +4q ~ N / ~ ~y1,Ay' ~ /
11 ° '~/ Y / i/
•
• • '
•
• • "•
•
~~
," .~^-~
~~
~i
,
Qb /
~~~ , ,,,
/ ~ /
1
(
~ ~ i~:
. ,~
`
N , ~
~
! ~
D @
~ 3 1 1 1 ~i
yy
, ' 1
S
t ~ 1
RI ~ ~
o ~ ~
Z
+r
F•, ~ " ~~~
~~:~ ~ ~
~q ~ a~;
J nnQ '
$ T. A. N~NRY lURVEY, A-1Z0
$ 1?
~ Mre ~,,, N00'29'~2"W -11296.OT
f100'7H3'M-170.q' ~ f100'l~9YW-43~A{' ~~~-~.
. 1 . r • 20' Prlate Tull •oo~f'MVr - ».a•r
~ J. M. BARRERA SURVEY, A-a9 I
1 1 VOL 113, P6
1
~ ~ I I
~~~ i i u
fn r ~1 ; ~ ~~ ~ ~
~ ~~ ~
~ ~~i ~~ g ~ iFi +~ Y
V ~ ~ ~ I ~ I
~ $ li~ I
i„ 1 ~ 1
.. 1 ~ 1
I I
I
rao n~rw
i
~~ ~ ~~e
N 02' 0!'26"W - 3S6.OT ~ ~r•,ww -
raraxrv-~' c$ n3rwu'W
fo+.w
~ ~
~ x ~ ?5 ~ o
A ~ ~ ~~
.fJ ~ = J
~~ ~~ ~~ j r
~o ~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $ _ _ _._.._ .._.._ _._,._
W ~ ~ ~ f~,'fi~ op ~ ~ '6~~ ~~ ~ .ew .ot1H,~~`~
fAjf"jj " ~ R I ~ ~ ~~' 4g eo' F,a,e J
LEfi6ND ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ r..~ ~~Qy al
e
~ $ far+earw-af~a / 0 n~N3~ ~ ty of '~~
I
~~-
1 ~ ~
+ 1 ~Q
e•• ~ I i ~/
iii .~~.
3
i
lu
O
~~~
p~ r
',Z
'^ a
F
/_ W
ev+
1
1
~~~
w -.
1
1
0
B. McOREOOR 8URVEY, A-171 ~ ~ I 1 .^ `• "ec
1 r ~
~~
1 ~ M
~ li or f~ 1 ~ I urq ~ c~ '1'~^ ~ n~' <fy
J. M. BARRERA BURVEY, A-09 ~a"'a ~ ~~~ ~Y~ ~~~ ~-~~ ~ ~ tsn
+0
~ ~
~
~. 1..1
~ ; ~ ~
m
C
N
~
W~br ~ m
~ ~ ~~
~
N
~ ~~
c
8 ~
~ ~ o~
~
~~ '~ Z
"0
V
~~~ z r
,..~
y
y " .j fUa L
\ may /yR y,_ f '\•$y ~qy ~ '•.~N~Ri
l iii ~ ~` ,,~ "~~'y, g~"
~ 4, ~ 'l+:
may, >s. ~ s
'i \` ` `~'aY 9
S
~~ r
~$~
~~ d~
• • ,` •.
•
. ~ 4 ~ ; /;
LEGEND ~ ~•~ /
e
i g
/ cc.tw
/
~ ~ ~~ / ~.
+o~ /
/ ~ ~' /
,p~s4 ~ ~^
/ / ,~` d~'
~e ~'y/ _q~ ~ o,~tib,~^ s~~ a~ x,,41 ~!,a~,~yo
.IC ~ 'i°' ff_'/ /: *¢~ ' gyp'
/ / .c.~ .^ a"~ .- ~
~.~\\ .• to •.\\•,~ i ~~ ~i4~ ~ ~ \,,~.. ~~ w~ ~yF~w•,~o `~~. i p~ ~ /
~'~\;\ \ '•: \~" ,~{~~~ ~1 ~ / ~ ~',~pi- '6s~ ` •I~ 0 ' ~/ \\ I •~••~..~ `~~!~,ql, I' ~\~,/ `fi'r ~~ / ~
\\ ` fib i ,~''~ ~. ~~ tra ~ 4' ~ \ ~, g' \. • \ P~
6 v,~
~ ~ ,~ ~~
'yam -~ .~ ~ %~ b .~'
`• _ ~. \ ~+°' '~ `.` •~ '" \~ ~1~ , ~~ ~ a~ a ,a
~\ ~ ~ ~\\ ~ \~ ` `bar \\ ~ ~ • .g- ~ a`i` ~~ ~ '14•acb ~~t
_ c
N ` ~5 1 \\ '
e . ~ 1 .ti
\\\ ~~± a~ dir. / `to ~~ ~` •`~'~ 1 r¢
\ yam. _ _
/ "4" ~ At•~j~.==~` ail. E.n
~~\ \~ \. ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~~'' ~.,~~ ~. of ~ _~ ~~~'~t+der ~' .'~..~..~~•
N
i i .~~
~ ''
~ o m
~ ~
~
~~~
~
N m
~
y
0
Z
~
~
a + °z r
~.
+ ~~• M1alr 4MY~k
4 0 !~ HaA• favn~ °~en~ r
~j t •
'<;
M _ A ~ jC
~ 1^ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~R ~ 4\\ ~~\ 4d1¢~ as+ ~ \~A \ A
~p ~a~ ~ j ~ s j \ ~ ~ ~ ~ §~~ ~
C. BCC ~ n ` ` ~ ~ 'ae*'''r r ~ ~' ~ O ~ JF ~i
1 ~ ~ ~ ~
~ w 1 \ 3
~ 1 ~, .tfC -_ ~ I a ~ \v 9th'
(O ~ ~ .gem-,vsc.~aeee \\ I a \ ~ iR~ ~_.g~ _- •~_~d+
~j . ~ / ~'
NI ~t ~ t: ~po~9 ~ ~.. \ ~'w.
a \ ~ ~ r k ~ °i \\ l~fp, 4 X019
~ '' ~ ` \ V E ~ § c ~ \\ ~ 4 lOl
~ 1 o,s \ ,ceeec-,weoAO.ees ~ o, \~ ~~re,
mrQC / /~, \
~~ O~ + `\ t~9 j /c~4~' v ~Q ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ '~ ~5i ~ ~ '@ f \ \ Ae'4i1-iCLd
77!!'11 \
,~ a R ~! ~~ii ~i7'jf ~' ?J
O: J '~` \\
y • b£.~ \ \` \\