Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/05/2004 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning CommissionFILE COPY • PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION February 5, 2004 Workshop Meeting - 6:00 P.M. Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M. C7 • ~~ College Station Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future AGENDA Workshop Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, February 5, 2004, at 6:00 p.m. Administrative Conference Room College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 1. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. 2. Discussion of minor and amending plats approved by Staff. • Edelweiss Gartens Phase 5 (03-276) ^ Edelweiss Gartens Phase 2 (04-07) • • 3. Discussion of Subcommittee Reports. • East Side Thoroughfare Plan and Land Use Update. 4. Consideration, discussion and possible action of the current regulations regarding attached signage and banners. 5. Consideration, discussion and possible action regarding requirements for single family development including garages. 6. Consideration, discussion and possible action regarding lighting regulations in the Unified Development Ordinance. 7. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 8. Adjourn ThIs building Is wheelchair accessible. Handicapped parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call 409-764-3517 or (TDD) 1-800- 735-2989. Agendas posted on Internet Website htto://dev:ervices.cf.colleae-stetion.tx.u: and Cable Access Channel 19. P&Z Workshop Agenda January 15, 2004 Page 1 of 1 College Station Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future • i. Hear Citizens. At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address the Commission on planning and zoning issues not already scheduled on tonight's agenda. The citizen presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. --(A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.) 2. Public Comment on the tlnifled Develooment Ordinance [ftlDO) At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address the Commission on the recently adopted Unified Development Ordinance. The citizen comments will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive the information and it will be added to the public record. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record. ) All matters listed under Item 3, Consent Agenda, are considered to be routine by the Planning and Zoning Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items Include preliminary and final plats, where staf9` has found compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all state recommendations. There will not be separate discussion of these items. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it will be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration. 3. Consent Agenda. 3.1 Consideration, discussion and possible action on the minutes: ^ January 15, 2004 Workshop Minutes ^ January 15, 2004 Regular Minutes 3.2 Consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for Shenandoah PH 8-B consisting of 14 lots on 3.5 of acres generally located at Alexandria Avenue and Decatur Drive. (03-321) 3.3 Consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for the Krenek Crossing Subdivision consisting of 47 lots on 7.41 acres located at the intersection of Krenek Tap Road and Dartmouth Drive. (03-312) AGENDA Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, February 5, 2004, at 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers, College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas This bulldiny Is wheelchair accessible. Handlappad parldny spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must ba made 48 hours before the meetlny. To make arranyamants all 409-764-3517 or ('TDD) 1-800-735-2989. Agendas posted on Internet Website htto://devservices.ci.collearstation.tx.us and Cable Access Channel 19. P&Z Agenda January 15, 2004 Page i of 2 Regular Agenda. • 4. Consideration, discussion and possible action on request(s) for absence from meetings. 5. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. _ __ 6. _ Public. hearing,- discussion and possible action on a Replat -for Benjamin Graham Subdivision Lots i-5 of Block 3, Lots i-3 of Block i, and Lot 2, located along Koppe Bridge Road near Greens Prairie Road in the City's ETA. (03-154) 7. Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Replat for the Randall's University Park Lot 3 consisting of 2 lots on 6 acres generally located at 505 Chimney Hill Drive. (03-202) 8. Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Rezoning of 4506 State Highway 6 South, consisting of 9.22 acres, from A-0 Agricultural Open to 3.61 acres of C-i General Commercial and 5.61 acres of C-2 Commercial Industrial. (04-04) 9. Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Rezoning for Fairhaven Cove (REZ) consisting of 12 lots on a 1.81 acre tract located in the Nantucket Subdivision off of Nantucket Drive. (03-301) 10. Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Rezoning for a future . phase of Shenandoah consisting of 39.943 acres located west of Southern Plantation Drive from A-0 Agricultural Open to R-i Single Family Residential. (03-145) i i. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on: 1) A variance request to Section 8-G.6 of the Subdivision Regulations concerning the number of lots on a cul-de-sac and Z) A Preliminary Plat for the Villas of Harvey consisting of 578 lots on 113 acres generally located near the northwestern corner of SH 30 and FM 158. (03-281) 12. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 13. Adjourn. • The Planning and Zoning Commission may sank advice from its attorney rparding a pending and contemplated litigstion subject or attorney-client privileged information. ARer executive session discussion, any final action or vote taken will be in public. If IitJgatlon or attorney-client privileged information Issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, an executive session will be held. P&Z Agenda 7anuary 15, 2004 Page 2 of 2 • WORKSHOP AGENDA ITEM N0.4 Sign Regulations u `~ ~~ COLLEGE STATION CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone 979.764.3570 /Fax-979.764.3496 MEMORANDUM January 28, 2004 TO: Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: SUBJECT: Natalie Thomas Ruiz, Development Sign regulations in the Unified Development finance • Staff initiated this agenda item to clarify and gather input on the current attached sign regulations, specifically as they relate to banners. Our goal is to have sign regulations in place that are user-friendly and easy to administer and enforce. To give you some background, the current sign regulations limit the amount of attached signage on a commercial building. The square footage allowed is related to the length of the main or entry facade. Basically, you are allowed 2 square feet of signage per linear foot of facade. This regulation pertains to all attached signage including banners. In the previous Zoning Ordinance, the amount or square footage of attached signage was unlimited. A permit was required for all attached signs including banners; however, there were no regulations regarding square footage, color or placement. Staff began a sign code enforcement effort this fall and notified several hundred commercial property owners that permits were required for all attached signage. Most of the properties in violation were due to banners that were not permitted. Many of the banners have been in place for months, even years without a permit. In working with various property owners and tenants we discovered several issues pertaining to banners that needed further discussion. The majority of banners are located on retail and restaurant uses. The person responsible for the banner is typically a manager or assistant manager who is unfamiliar with sign regulations. Code enforcement efforts are cumbersome and labor intensive given the current requirements and calculations required. Educating property owners and tenants on banner requirements is also labor intensive given the complexity of the code and the high level of turnover in the retail and restaurant industries. This difficulty is compounded when regulating and permitting banners in design districts such as Northgate or Wolf Pen Creek. Staff discussed several ideas to simplify the current regulations including the following: Prohibiting banners altogether. No longer regulating banners. Developing very specific standards and specifications. We are currently working with several local sign companies to determine industry standards and sizes for banners. We discussed the possibility of developing a standard size, colors, method of installation and number allowed. All banners would be required to meet the City's specifications and permits would not be required. Banners could also be excluded from the attached sign calculations. Code enforcement officers in the field could easily tell if a banner met the specifications without researching the permit history and the allowable attached signage calculations. Before proceeding, we wanted to discuss this issue further with the Commission to gather input. • cc: Eric Hurt, Assistant Fire Chief • CONSENT AGENDA ITEM N0.3.1 Minutes January 15, 2004 Workshop Meeting January 15, 2004 Regular Meeting • College Station Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future • MINUTES Workshop Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, 7anuary 15, 2004, at 6:30 p.m. Training Room, College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Shafer, White, Hall, Davis, Trapani and Reynolds. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Williams. CITY COUNCIL MEMEBERS PRESENT: Happ. CITY STAFF PRESENT: Development Services Director Templin, City Planner Kee, Assistant Development Review Manager George, Staff Planners Prochazka and Reeves, Transportation Planner Fogle, Graduate Civil Engineers Cotter and Thompson, Assistant City Attomey Nemcik, Economic Development Director Faust, Action Center Representative Kelley and Staff Assistant Hazlett. 1. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. Consent and regular agenda items were discussed. Assistant City Attorney Nemcik clarified the legal aspect of the Commission's concerns regarding final plats, explaining that the Commission should not disapprove a plat that meets the minimum requirements. Their charge is adminsterial only and not discretionary as with a rezoning. 2. Discussion of minor and amending plats approved by Staff. ^ Stone Forest Phase 2 Replat (03-259) Graduate Civil Engineer Thompson explained that a lot line was shifted to make one lot larger. 3. Discussion of Subcommittee Reports. ^ East Side Thoroughfare Plan and Land Use Update. Transportation Planner Fogle reported on the recent meetings with the property owners and announced the various other meetings that are being planned. ^ Arrington Road Comprehensive Plan Amendment. • City Planner Kee announced that the Amendment was approved by the City Council on January 8, 2004. P&Z Workshop Agenda January 15, 2004 Page i of 2 4. Consideration, discussion and possible action on a proposed Subdivision Regulations amendment pertaining to parkland dedication and • recommendations by the Parks and Recreation Board. This amendment will be presented for consideration in a few months. 5. Consideration, discussion and possible action regarding future agenda items requested by the Commission. Assistant Development Review Manager George asked the Commissioners to inform Staff via a-mail of possible vacations during Spring Break. 6. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. No. items were mentioned. • 7. Adjourn ATTEST: Future joint meeting with the Zoning Board of Adjustment including an audio conference on Wednesday, February 18, 2004 at 3:00. This meeting will explain the role of the Zoning Board of Adjustments and will be held in Council Chambers. • Commercial properties zoned C-i General Commercial and C-2 Commercial Industrial and compliance with the City's Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). City Planner Kee stated that these categories are being reviewed and properties identified. Staff will determine if an initiative to rezone them is necessary. Also, a Comprehensive Plan Amendment may be necessary. The Tracking Sheet will be sent via a-mail to the Commissioners each week. A workshop for planning commissioners is scheduled for February 27. Commissioner Reynolds made the motion to adjourn which was seconded by Commissioner Davis. The motion carried 6-0. FOR: Shafer, White, Hall, Reynolds, Davis and Trapani. AGAINST: None. ABSENT: Williams. APPROVED: Chairman, Scott Shafer Staff Assistant, Susan Hazlett P&Z Workshop Agenda January 15, 2004 Page 2 of 2 1 College Station Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future MINUTES Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, January 15, 2004, at 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers, College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Shafer, White, Hall, Davis, Trapani and Reynolds. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Williams. CITY COUNCIL MEMEBERS PRESENT: Happ. CITY STAFF PRESENT: Assistant City Manager Brown, Development Services Director Templin, City Planner Kee, Assistant Development Review Manager George, Staff Planners Prochazka and Reeves, Transportation Planner Fogle, Graduate Civil Engineers Cotter and Thompson, Assistant City Attorney Nemcik, Economic Development Director Faust, Action Center Representative Kelley and Staff Assistant Hazlett. Chairman Shafer called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 1. Hear Citizens. No one spoke. 2. Public Comment on the Unified Develoument Ordinance 1UD01 Steve Arden, 311 Cecelia Loop, commented on information regarding the zero lot line for patio homes. He asked that the building standards information be placed on the plats in order to help the builders with the processing. 3. Consent Agenda. Commissioner Davis motioned to approve the consent agenda items. Commissioner Trapani seconded the motion. The motion carried by a vote of fi-0. FOR: Shafer, Davis, Williams, Trapani, Reynolds, White and Hall. AGAINST: None. ABSENT: Williams. 3.1 Approved by consent the minutes: • December ii, 2003 Workshop Minutes ^ December 11, 2003 Regular Minutes P&Z Agenda ]anuary 15, 2004 Page i of 13 3.2 Approved by consent the Final Plat for Reatta Meadows Subdivision, Section • 1, Phase 1 consisting of 75 lots on 19 acres generally located at 2201 Barron Road at future Victoria Avenue. (03-269) 3.3 Approved by consent the Master Preliminary Plat for the Crowley Tract consisting of several large tracts on 331 acres generally located at SH6 and future SH 40. (03-164) 3.4 Approved by consent the Preliminary Plat for the Texas World Speedway Subdivision consisting of 3 lots 605 acres generally located at 17529 SH 6 S in the City's ETJ. (03-304) 3.5 Approved by consent the Final Plat for Castlegate Subdivision Section 5, Phase 1 consisting of 57 lots on 18.72 acres located off Green's Prairie Road and Castlegate Drive. (03-308) 3.6 Approved by consent the Final Plat for Peach Crossing Subdivision consisting of 48 residential lots on 60.41 acres located at the intersection of Peach Creek Road and Peach Creek Cut-Off in the City's 1=17. (03-313) Regular Agenda. 4. Consideration, discussion and possible action on request(s) for absence from meetings. There were no absence requests submitted for approval at this time. • 5. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. No items were removed from the consent agenda for discussion. 6. Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for The Glade Section 12 consisting of 17 lots on 3.03 acres generally located off of Southwest Parkway across from Southwood Drive. (03-218) Staff Planner Reeves presented the Staff Report. She recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat as submitted; explaining that the plat consists of 17 lots on 3.03 acres zoned R-i Single Family Residential. She pointed out that developed single family is to the west and east of the subject property and that the plat is in preparation of single family infill development. Ms. Reeves added that the plat is in compliance with the Land Use Plan and that the final plat will come before the Commission for approval in the near future. Commissioner Trapani clarified that the plat meets all the requirements. Chairman Shafer opened the public hearing. The following spoke in opposition to the Preliminary Plat: 1) Joy Lynn Lucas Skach, 1722 Laura Lane: • Traffic concerns - Number of homes being built ^ Number of additional vehicles P&Z Agenda January 15, 2004 Page 2 of 13 • Southwood should continue straight • Street is not wide enough to accommodate street parking for the expected • additional vehicles • Requested a traffic study 2) Claude Gibson, 1603 Laura Lane: • Safety concerns regarding pedestrians • Hazardous intersection ^ Neighborhood integrity jeopardized • Discourages families 3) Cindy Kovar ^ Discourages families and encourages students • Noise pollution • Fewer houses, larger yards ^ Good mix of families • Excessive number of additional vehicles 4) Peter Gray, 1703 Glade: ^ Traffic congestion - • Homes being planned are not comparable to those existing in the neighborhood which will impact the neighborhood • Requested a study 5) Wayne Smith 1303 Glade: • Traffic concerns • Concern regarding narrow cul-de-sac • 6) Glen Phillips, 1704 Glade: ^ Lower standards compared to past plans • Applicant has never contacted or spoken with the residents • Questions the process of past and recent plans Staff Planner Reeves addressed the concerns, explaining that there were previously two variances requested. One to Section 8-G.6 of the Subdivision Regulations conceming minimum tumaround dimensions of cul-de-sacs and the other variance request was to Section 12-I.4 concerning street jogs. Since the first submittal, these two requests have been retracted and are no longer needed. Stewart Kling, Stewart Kling Engineering, clarified that the applicant withdrew the two previous variance requests and made changes to the design of the project which now meets the City's preliminary plat requirements. The first change to the design was with the configuration of the minimum tumaround dimensions of the cul-de-sac. The new proposal exceeds the requirements of a cul-de-sac tumaround. The second change was in regards to the distance between Southwood and the entrance to Limestone. The lots have been redesigned in order to create a street jog that is greater than the 125 feet minimum requirement. Therefore, neither of the previous variance requests are needed. Commissioner White clarified the reconfiguration of the cul-de-sac. Mr. Kling confirmed that the cul-de-sac tumaround is now larger than a standard cul-de-sac. • Commissioner Davis, referring to the width of the proposed street, asked if an emergency vehicle would have adequate space if there were parking on both sides of the street. Mr. Kling replied that there would not. P&Z Agenda ]anuary 15, 2004 Page 3 of 13 Chairman Scott reiterated that with the new design of the project, all of the preliminary plat requirements have been met. • Development Services Directory Templin stated that ITE, the Institute of Traffic Engineers, estimates approximately 10 vehicle trips a day per single family home. He added that at this stage of the process, the home designs are not known. However, there is an unconfirmed rumor that the homes will not have a garage. Mr. Templin stated that the City does not require a single family home to have a garage. Commissioner Davis, in an attempt to clarify the issues, stated that part of the process is what the Commission can and cannot do and what the requirements are for a preliminary plat. The concerns and the issues are still generated by safety, congestion and traffic. He asked if it is an appropriate option for the Commission to require street parking only on one side of the street. Development Services Director Templin stated that it is not an option for the Commission but is available to the City Council through an amendment to the Traffic Code. Transportation Planner Fogle stated that the City's Traffic Management Team addresses, on a case by case basis, any situation with a street where there is a concern about emergency vehicles not being able to make it through to the neighborhood due to parking problems. He confirmed the estimated 10 trips per day per single family dwelling unit by ITE, the Institute of Traffic Engineers, as stated earlier by Development Services Director Templin. In calculating the estimated trips per day for the 17 planned dwelling unite, Mr. Fogle stated that the increase in traffic for Southwest Parkway would be insignificant, adding that Southwest Parkway is • designed to carry 10-20 thousand vehicles a day. He estimated that it is currently carrying about 15 thousand a day. Therefore, there would not be a major overall impact in traffic on Southwest Parkway. In regards to the driveway separation, the City looks at three different criteria for driveway spacing; spacing between driveways, street separation between streets where a minimum 275 feet is required and at opposite right and opposite left spacing. Mr. Fogle briefly explained the opposite right and opposite left spacing. Sally Coble, 1805 Bee Creek, stated that because the proposed project would have a much higher density than that of the surrounding area the neighborhood integrity would not be maintained. She added that there were still concerns regarding traffic at the intersections on Southwest Parkway. Glen Phillips, 1704 Glade, interjected that because the proposed project is for the building of smaller homes without garages on smaller lots, the property values of the existing homes in the area would be impacted. Peter Gray, 1703 Glade, echoed Mr. Phillips's statements, saying that the proposed development is out of nature with the rest of the community. In addition, he pointed out that the traffic would not be so much of an increase but that by adding another intersection the City would be adding to the complexity of the already existing and risky maneuvering of traffic in that area. Karen Belter, 1022 Puryear, stated that she expressed these same concerns to the City Council at their meeting last week, asking the City Council to amend or enact a • rule that suggests that garages be a component of any new single family home that is being constructed. She also suggested that family housing have a minimum green space and back yard size. She pointed out that the UDO (Unified Development P&Z Agenda January 15, 2004 Page 4 of 13 Ordinances) has a section that supports the intent and design in terms of residential developments and talks about the intent being to protect buffer residential • communities from other developments that are not in the same design. Glenn Thomas, 1110 Twelfth Man, pointed out a similar development off Welsh near the Mormon Church. He suggested a PDDH zoning. Commissioner Davis explained that the proposed project is working with a current zoning-and that this is a preliminary plat issue rather than a rezoning issue. Commissioner White asked if the developer had met with the residents to discuss the proposed development. The residents answered with a resounding no. Peter Gray, 1703 Glade, stated that the assumption is that these will be single family homes. However, the size and design is not for families on a long-term basis. Chairman Shafer closed the public hearing. Commissioner Trapani motioned to approve the preliminary plat for discussion purposes. Commissioner Reynolds seconded the motion. Commissioner Trapani explained that the duty of the Planning and Zoning Commission in regards to a preliminary plat is strictly administrative. He admonished the developer for not meeting with the residents to listen to and address the issues and concerns. Further, Commissioner Trapani explained that the Commission can direct Staff to look at the issues that have been voiced but explained that the Commission does not have the authority to take action on them • as it is not in the Commission's purview of authority to do so. He added that though the Commission may agree with the residents regarding the expressed concerns, the standards are set and have reportedly been met and therefore, the Commission is charged with and obligated to approve the plat since it meets all the current development requirements. The Commission has no discretion to do otherwise. In closing, Commissioner Trapani stated that the Commission would ask the City Council to explore this situation and the issues that were raised. Commissioner White concurred with Commissioner Trapani's statements. For the record, Commissioner White stated that he opposes the project and is troubled in understanding how this development would enhance the integrity of the neighbofiood. Commissioner Davis also concurred, agreeing that infill is needed but opposes the proposed project, stating that the lots should be larger than is proposed. He encouraged the City Council to look further at infill projects regarding grandfathered zoning situations and to design a mechanism for addressing such situations in the future. Commissioner Reynolds reiterated the important that the City Council address the parking and emergency vehicle issues. Commissioner Hall stated that he views this project as a safety issue regarding emergency vehicles. He stated that the project should be reviewed for better alignment and to also address issues and safety concerns relating to signalization • that is currently there before approving the plat. He questioned if this is the best use of the property for long term as it is presented. P&Z Agenda January 15, 2004 Page 5 of 13 Commissioner Davis asked if the item could be tabled. Development Services Director Templin explained that there is a 30 day rule under State law and will be • automatically approved prior to the next Commission meeting date. Chairman Shafer stated that he agrees with all the comments made by the Commission but explained that the plat meets the minimum standards and the Commission is obligated to approve this preliminary Plat in its current state. Chairman Shafer called the question:--- - -- -- ---- FOR: None. AGAINST: Shafer, White, Trapani, Hall, Reynolds and Davis. ABSENT: Williams. The motion to approve failed by a vote of 6-0. Commissioner Hall motioned to deny the preliminary plat. Commissioner White seconded the motion. Commissioner Trapani questioned legal counsel regarding health, safety and welfare. He asked if this rule would apply to this preliminary plat request. Assistant City Attorney Nemcik asked the Commission if they were saying that the alignment of the street is considered unsafe and wants Staff to review it again. Commissioner Davis said that based upon the proposed density and the issue of traffic coming down Southwest Parkway, it is a safety issue and it is near a school. • Assistant City Attorney Nemcik affirmed that if the Commission has a specific issue, such as the alignment to the street, they could, at the preliminary plat stage, deny the plat and ask. that the realignment issue be reconsidered. She added that the developer could choose to leave the proposed alignment as is and bring the item back for final plat consideration. Commissioner Hall added that his motion to deny was to include that the preliminary plat be denied based upon a concern of the alignment of the entrance to the proposed subdivision as it relates to Southwest Parkway and Southwood Drive. Commissioner White seconded the amended motion. Chairman Shafer confirmed that the alignment should be reviewed and a better possibility as being aligned directly across from Southwood. In addition to the alignment issue, Commissioner Hall stated that a signal light costs approximately $125,000-$150,000 and to add another street on an already heavily trafficked intersection would be costly to the taxpayers of this community. He suggested that a developer should work within the boundaries of the investments of made by the taxpayers in the signalization of the City's thoroughfares. This is a reasonable request. He closed by stating that he does not believe that this plat has offered enough information to justify a vote of confidence. Chairman Shafer called the question. The motion to deny, based upon a concern of the alignment of the entrance to the proposed subdivision as it relates to Southwest Parkway and Southwood Drive carried by a vote of 6-0. t FOR: Shafer, Davis, Williams, Trapani, Reynolds, White and Hall. AGAINST: None. P&Z Agenda January 15, 2004 Page 6 of 13 ABSENT: Williams. The Commission encouraged the developer to meet with the residents. 7. Public hearing, discussion and possible action on a Comurehensive Plan Amendment from Medium Density Residential to a Non-Residential classification for the area south of the Bernadine Estate Subdivision and bound by the East Bypass Frontage Road at Deacon and Texas Avenue South; and a Rezoning for Lot 2, Block A and Lots i and 2, Block B of the --- - --Haney-Highway 6 Snbdivislorr -consisting of 5.69 acres generally located near the Northeast corner of Texas Avenue at Deacon from C-3 Light Commercial to PDD Planned Development District. (03-319 and 03-307) Staff Planner Prochazka presented the Staff Report. She explained that the public hearing is being held for both the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and a Rezoning which will require two motions and actions by the Commission. She pointed out that the Land Use Plan currently designates this property as Single Family Residential and that Staff would support a plan amendment to Retail Neighborhood to include not only the property for rezoning, but also the property to the northeast of this. She added that the rezoning request is for 5.69 acres not including the A-P tract to the northeast and that the request is from C-3 to PDD for the development of a mini storage warehouse with an accessory live-in unit. Ms. Prochazka reported that the subject property has had numerous commercial rezoning requests, all which have been contentious and that five such requests were denied before the existing commercial zoning was approved in 1988. She explained that with the 1988 rezoning, an agreement was reached between the Mile Drive residents and the current property owner which included a greenbelt between the residences and the subject property which is not platted and a less intense commercial zoning district of C-3. Mini-storage Warehouses were a permitted use at that time. However, this has recently been removed from the C-3 zoning district with the adoption of the UDO. Because this property has been the subject of many rezoning hearings in the passed, Ms. Prochazka stated that a neighborhood meeting was arranged by the Staff to give the property owner the opportunity to talk to the Mile Drive residents to present their view and to get feed back from the residents. At the meeting, the residents mentioned several uses that they would like to exclude from the PDD that are still included in this rezoning request. They include dry cleaners, restaurants, utilities and cell towers. The neighbors also expressed an interest in the maximum height of two (2) stories on any development on the property. Ms. Prochazka stated that Staff has compiled a list of uses using the original 1988 agreement and the opinions of the current residents from the meeting with them. She pointed out the comparison sheet of the original 1988 agreement, the proposed PDD and Staff's recommendation. She added that Staff recommends approval with a maximum height of two (2) stories on any development and the following land uses: art studio, indoor education facility, mini-storage warehouse with an accessory living quarter, offices, personal photo shops, printing or copy shops, radio or TV station or studio without towers, and retail sales and services. Also, Ms. Prochazka explained that Staff views the purpose of the PDD in this particular location as restoring an agreement between the owners of the property and the Mile Drive residents and for limiting uses next to an established neighborhood that may experience cut-through traffic when this tract develops. Chairman Shafer wanted clarification on the two actions required by the Commission for this project. He opened the public hearing. Jim Jett, 5004 Congressional, representing the land owners, stated that there were three (3) uses excluded from the list that were not specifically mentioned in the P&Z Agenda January 15, 2004 Page 7 of 13 meeting between the owners and the residents that he requests are added back into the list of uses; animal care facilities, government facilities and health care clinics. Commissioner White clarified the three items and that it would be in the best interest of the owner, keeping the subject property marketable for any future developer/owner to add them back to the list of uses. Ms. Prochazka further explained the list of uses and why the three were not included on the list. She reiterated that the reason the Staff is recommending the PDD zoning is to bring the subject preperty-track into the original agreement made in 1988. Chairman Shafer closed the public hearing. Commissioner White motioned to approve the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Commissioner Davis seconded the motion. The motion carried 6-0. FOR: Shafer, White, Hall, Trapani, Davis and Reynolds. AGAINST: None. ABSENT: Williams. Commissioner Davis motioned to approve the rezoning with Staff's recommendations. Commissioner Trapani seconded the motion. The motion carried 6-0. FOR: Shafer, White, Hall, Trapani, Davis and Reynolds. AGAINST: None. ABSENT: Williams. Commissioner Davis asked how Mr. Jett's wncems could be addressed. Ms. Prochazka stated that the rezoning would need to be amended. Further discussion ensued regarding the greenbelt preserve and the adjacent access easement. Commissioner Davis amended his motion to include the two uses that would not be included on the list of uses with the PDD rezoning district; animal care facilities, and health care clinics. Government facilities would be allowed. Commissioner Trapani seconded the motion. The motioned carried 6-0. FOR: Shafer, Davis, Trapani, Reynolds, White and Hall. AGAINST: None. ABSENT: Williams 8. Public hearing, discussion and possible action on a Replat for Harvey Hillsides Lot 38, Block i consisting of 3 lots on 5 acres located at 43 Pamela Lane in the City's ETA. (03-302) Graduate Civil Engineer Thompson presented the Staff Report and recommended approval of the Replat as submitted. He explained that the property owner is subdividing the current 5-acre tract into 3 lots, adding that each will be greater than the 1-acre minimum size lot as required in the county. Mr. Thompson also pointed out that all the lots meet or exceed the City's Subdivision Regulations. Chairman Shafer opened the public hearing. John Vilas, 15 Ranchero stated that the Harvey Hillsides Architectural Control Committee does not object to the Replat. He added that the applicant is a member of the committee but declined to vote when the vote was taken. P&Z Agenda January 15, 2004 Page 8 of 13 Chairman Shafer closed the public hearing. • Commissioner Trapani motioned to approve the Replat as submitted. Commissioner Davis seconded the motion. The motion carried by a vote of 6-0. FOR: Shafer, Davis, Williams, Trapani, Reynolds, White and Hall. AGAINST: None. ABSENT: Williams. 9. Public hearing, discussion and possible aetion on a Conditional Use Permit for a Night Club for Clark Moses Entertainment, located at 2206 Texas Avenue South in the Brazos Square Shopping Center. (03-318) Staff Planner Prochazka presented the Staff Report, recommending approval of the Conditional Use Permit. She explained that the entertainment for the nightclub would consist of recorded music and karaoke. The hours of operation was also discussed, including the anticipated peak hours. While parking continues to be an issue at this shopping center, the other uses in the center have peak hours that differ from the proposed nightclub. She added that no additional parking would be required. There was further discussion regarding the parking issue. Ms. Prochazka pointed out that once an intense use is opened and not abandoned, an intense use, including another restaurant, is permitted to re-open in the lease space without the provision of additional parking. The parking deficiencies and the amount of intense use in the shopping center are grandfathered. Commissioner Davis asked if it was anticipated that pedestrian traffic would increase. • Ms. Prochazka stated that Staff would assume that all of the parking area would be open to the nightclub since no other entity would be open during its hours of operation. Cross easement agreements were briefly discussed. Commissioner Hall stated his opposition to the nightclub, citing the impact on Outback Steakhouse and the encroachment on Target. He asked how much of the parking lot is the owner willing to resurface and re-stripe? He current condition and upkeep of the property is questionable and stated that the entire center should be resurfaced with this type of intense use going in. There was some discussion regarding the City's noise ordinance and the nearby apartments. Commissioner Hall reiterated the poor condition of the parking lot and the property in general as being a safety issue, specifically pointing out the unfenced detention pond behind the center and several major pot-holes of considerable size. Commissioner Davis concurred with the concerns already voiced; issues regarding parking accessibility, condition of the lot, increase in pedestrian traffic. Mr. Prochazka explained the Commissions' options, stating that they may impose physical conditions related to the adverse impact of the nightclub, such as parking, resurfacing, lighting, and sound, insulation, etc. Commissioner Davis stated that the lighting on the back side of the property was • very poor and should be addressed due to the hours of operation. He also expressed concern about the affect of the lighting on the residents behind the site. Chairman Shafer and Commissioner Hall concurred. P&Z Agenda January 15, 2004 Page 9 of 13 Chairman Shafer opened the public hearing. • The Target Store Manager, James Haverland spoke in opposition to the nightclub, expressing major concerns regarding the amount of parking already in that center. He added that he and the management of Outback Steakhouse have an agreement regarding the common area of maintenance since Outback customers are allowed to park in the Target parking lot. Additionally, he pointed out that the detention pond behind the center is owned by the City. - The applicant, Boyd Moses, explained the plans for the nightclub. He pointed out that resurfacing of the parking lot is planned for early this year by the owner. He also stated that the lighting along the rear exterior of the property will be addressed. Billy Clark stated that the occupancy for the nightclub was 240 people and that the peak hours would be different from all others in the center. Chairman Shafer closed the public hearing. Commissioner Hall motioned to deny the Conditional Use Permit. No one seconded the motion. Commissioner Trapani motioned to approve the Conditional Use Permit with conditions. i) To resurface the parking area in the back and the side of the building 2) To re-stripe the newly surfaced parking area 3) To install lighting and to direct it away from the neighboring residents • while accurately and safely covering the area for security purposes 4) To return at the end of the year to review the lighting and parking situation Assistant City Attorney Nemcik explained that the site will be inspected prior to the Certificate of Occupancy. Ms. Prochazka pointed out that the parking spaces are over the minimum requirement and therefore a time condition cannot be placed on it. Ms. Nemcik stated that the Commission is required to give the applicant owner enough time to recuperate their investment. Mr. Moses stated that 3 to 5 years would be a reasonable amount of time. He added that he spoke with Mr. Haverland, the Target manager, and that they are going to agree to a common area of maintenance. Commissioner Trapani withdrew the time limitation condition and added as a fourth condition noise and buffering. Mr. Clark addressed the noise concern, explaining the construction plans to insulate between the units in order to eliminate any disturbance. He added that the building is constructed in a way that will contribute to good sound buffering. Commissioner Davis seconded the motion. • Commissioner Hall requested that the area for re-surfacing be specific in its expectations as being around the entire center and up to Texas Avenue. Also, the P&Z Agenda January 15, 2004 Page 10 of 13 conditions for the lighting are intended for the entire property. He stated that the owner should be held accountable for the condition of the property and suggested • that the Commission table the request. He opposes the Conditional Use Permit as it is presented. Staff interjected that the conditions are placed on the applicant and is his responsibility to address the issues. She assured the Commission that the Staff would follow-up on making sure the conditions are met. Commissioner Trapani added specifics to the conditions of his motion: i) That all of the parking lot for the center is resurfaced and paved per City standards 2) That all of the parking lot is stripped per City's standards 3) That the entire center is cleaned per City's standards, specifically the back and side area that has been neglected 4) That the entire development meets development standards 5) That the lighting is corrected and properly working and maintained for the full length of the back of the property The motion to approve the Conditional Use Permit with conditions carried by a vote of 5-i. FOR: Shafer, Davis, Trapani, Reynolds and White. . AGAINST: Hall. ABSENT: Williams. • 10. Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Replat for Lot 3R of the Regency South Subdivision consisting of 1 lot on 0.08 acres located at 1816 Brothers Boulevard #17. (03-295) Graduate Civil Engineer Thompson presented the Staff Report. Mr. Thompson stated that the replat for a single lot in Regency South Subdivision. He explained that the purpose for the replat is to move the existing lot line adjacent to the Common Area over slightly to increase the lot width. He added that this subdivision incorporates "zero-lot-line" construction. Also, the owner is still required to maintain 20-ft. minimum width for the emergency entrance and the owner must also construct the emergency gated entryway in accordance with the. approved rezoning, which has been proposed with the construction of the home on this lot. Chairman Shafer opened the public hearing. Glenn Thomas, 1110 Twelfth Man, concurred with Mr. Thompson in that the purpose for the replat is to move the new house over approximately 5 ft to allow for the 20- ft. easement for emergency vehicle access. He stated that no one within the Homeowners Association rejected the proposal. Chairman Shafer closed the public hearing. Commissioner Trapani motioned to approve Commissioner White. The motion carried 6-0. FOR: Shafer, Davis, Trapani, Reynolds, AGAINST: None. ABSENT: Williams. • P&Z Agenda January 15, 2004 the replat which was seconded by White and Hall. Pageilofl3 11. Public hearing, discussion and possible action on a Replat for Holleman Place, Lots i and 2, consisting of 3 lots on 7.7 acres generally located at 304 • Holleman Drive East. (03-309) Graduate Civil Engineer Thompson presented the Staff Report. Mr. Thompson stated that the owners of Lots i and 2 are replatting to prepare Lots iR and 3R for future development. He added that Lot 2R is the site of the existing Fire Station #1. This replat will create one additional lot, dedicate additional right-of-way for Holleman and remove the 60-ft. building setback line that is shown on the original plat. in closing, Mr. Thompson stated that Staff recommends approval of the replat. Chairman Shafer opened the public hearing. Since there were no other comments, Chairman Shafer closed the public hearing. Commissioner Trapani motioned to approve the replat which was seconded by Commissioner Davis. The motion carried by a vote of 6-0. FOR: Shafer, Davis, Trapani, Reynolds, White and Hall. AGAINST: None. ABSENT: Williams. 12. Public hearing, discussion and possible action on a Replat for University Park Phase 2 Block V consisting of 2 lots on 2.4 acres generally located at 901 University Drive East. (03-310) Graduate Civil Engineer Thompson stated that the property owner is subdividing Lots 3D and 3C. He explained that normally this would be an amending plat. However, the lot configuration requires the extension of public infrastructure which was not • constructed the last time these lots were subdivided. Therefore, some lots in the subdivision are without public water and sewer. This replat would remedy this situation. He added that all the lots meet the minimum requirements and that Staff recommends approval with Staff Review Comments. Chairman Shafer opened the public hearing. No other comments were made. Therefore, Chairman Shafer closed the public hearing. Commissioner White motioned to approve the replat with Staff comments. Commissioner Davis seconded the motion, which carried by a vote of 6-0. FOR: Shafer, Davis, Trapani, Reynolds, White and Hall. AGAINST: None. ABSENT: Williams. 13. Consideration, discussion and possible action on a Master Plan and Preliminary Plat, with a variance request to the maximum block length, for the Spring Creek Corporate Campus consisting of 19 lots on .384.1 acres located at 4301 State Highway 6 South. (03-270 ~ 03-314) Staff Planner Prochazka presented the Staff Report. She stated that Staff recommends approval of the Master Plan and also the Preliminary Plat on the condition the variance request is approved and that the Staff Review Comments are addressed. Ms. Prochazka explained that approval of the Preliminary Plat requires a variance to the maximum block length of 800 feet. She referred the Commission to the letter submitted by the Assistant Director of Economic Development explaining • that the request is necessary in order to develop the new business park in accordance with the master plan which was previously reviewed by the Commission and approved by the City Council. Ms. Prochazka pointed out that the property is P&Z Agenda January 15, 2004 Page 12 of 13 currently zoned M-i and is in compliance with the Rock Prairie/Greens Prairie Small • Area Plan which shows the area as Industrial R&D and also with the Thoroughfare Plan which shows the extensions of Pebble Creek Parkway and Lakeway Drive as major collectors. Commissioner Davis motioned to approve the Master Plan. Commissioner Trapani seconded the motion. The motion carried by a vote of 6-0. FOR: Shafer, Davis, Williams, Trapani, Reynolds, White and Hall. AGAINST: None. ABSENT: Williams. Commissioner Davis motioned to approve the Preliminary Plat and Variance Request with Staff comments. Commissioner Reynolds seconded the motion. The motion carried 6-0. FOR: Shafer, Davis, Williams, Trapani, Reynolds, White and Hall. AGAINST: None. ABSENT: Williams. 14. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be liven. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. Commissioner Hall: Off-site signage relating to public transportation. • 15. Adjourn. A motion to adjourn the meeting was made my Commissioner Reynolds and seconded by Commissioner Trapani. The motion carried by a vote of 6-0. FOR: Shafer, Davis, Williams, Trapani, Reynolds, White and Hall. AGAINST: None. ABSENT: Williams. The meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m. ATTEST: Staff Assistant, Susan Hazlett u APPROVED: Chairman, Scott Shafer P&Z Agenda ]anuary 15, 2004 Page 13 of 13 C7 • CONSENT AGENDA ITEM N0.3.2 Final Plat Shenandoah Phase 8-B • v Z~ ~ LLa w Q~ Q C1 a~ ~ w V ~ b ~ ~,o N v cn ~ M x ~ ~ O v ~ I W ~ '' ~ .off. ~ U s fi$' , 0 w a d 4 w V ~ Q `e 8 ~ ~ f-` V` Y t ~, 0 .~ L W e ~' ~ Q w w a a ~ w w Q w ~ ~ 0 c - ~ ~ Z * a Q r .. - .y^~ _ - Z ~ _ ~ R T a^ 9 ~ w ~ y • P aw s~ ~ ~ - =a, -' - a a _ . ~ ~ Oa _ ~' d R R a 40 .~' - . = W U a ~ ~cT ; - a w a ~, ~ ~ ~ {~ _ - ;~ - w ~ ^ ., ~ $ - ~ ~ g ! _ A 4 _ ~ ~ x! a s ~ 6 t ~ ' r x R ! i X a n a - a= $ C __ ":_ _ ~ _ o O iJj - - a ~~ ..a ~~ a _ - ~ b ~ V/ ..a _ _ _ s v _ _ ~ =a ~' _" ~ ` ~o ~_^a : °pJ °. a V b E R ,. * w .. ~~'. w i ~ x z t • MEMORANDUM January 27, 2004 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Spencer Thompson Email: sthompson@cstx.gov SUBJECT: FINAL PLAT for SHENANDOAH PH 8-B Item: Consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for Shenandoah PH 8-B consisting of 14 lots on 3.5 acres generally located at Alexandria Avenue and Decatur Drive. Applicant: Ed Froehling; Owner, Developer Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat as • submitted. Item Summary: This item is for consideration of a Final Plat for Shenandoah Subdivision Phase 8-B. Phase 8-B was shown on the amended and approved Preliminary Plat. This Final Plat is in compliance with the approved Preliminary. Access to the lots shown along Alexandria will be by way of the public alley. Direct driveway access to Alexandria is prohibited by City Ordinance. The Plat dedicates the remaining 0.4 acres of Shenandoah Park located across Alexandria. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: Land Use Plan: Single-family, residential Thoroughfare Plan: Decatur is shown on the T-fare Plan as a major collector. Parkland Dedication: The dedication of parkland shown on this plat completes the land dedication requirements as approved by the Parks Board. The Parkland Development Fee is still applicable. Budgetary & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. Area map 2. Application • 3. Copy of Plat on wall of Council Chambers ~p;~ o:~- y ~r FINAL PLAT APPLI~ FOR OFFICE USE ONLY P8Z Case No.: 1/~' 3a Date Submitted: ~~ ~ 0 wr~nw~ ~,~,~' r, ~ ~~~. (Check one) 'Includes ^ Amending ®Final ^ Vacating ^ Replat 0300.00) (5400.00) 0400.00) (5600.00)• ~a fee The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P8Z Commission consideration. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ® Final plat review and filing fee (see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets ~ $55.00 per additional sheet N/A Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations ~ $100 (if applicable) ® Development permit fee of $200.00 (if applicable). ® Infrastructure inspection fee of $600.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed) N/A All replats must be accompanied v~ith a copy of the deed restrictions/covenants for this plat. ® Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.) ® One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and/or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable). ® Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. ® A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. ® Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable). ^ Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks 8~ Recreation Board, please provide proof of OF SUBDIVISION Shenandoah. Phase 8-B SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot & Block) to the east of the intersection of Southern Plantation and Decatur APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): Name Edward Froehlinra 8~ Ed Froehlino Builder. Inc. E-Mail Street Address 3887 Hi4h Lonesome Road City Colles~e Station State TX Zip Code 77845 Phone Number 979.776.8266 Fax Number 979.774.0565 CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: (All owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet, if necessary) Name Edward Froehlinsa E-Mail Street Address (same as above) City Phone Number ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Zip Code Fax Number Name McClure Engineering. Inc. E-Mail mikemCaatca.net Street Address 1008 Woodcreek Drive Suite 103 ~ity College Station State TX Zip Code 77845 Phone Number 979.693.3838 Fax Number 979.693.2554 State Acreage Total Property 3.543 acres Total # Of Lots 14 lots R-O-W Acreage 0.805 ac. Existing Use: Vacant Proposed Use: Residential ~mber Of Lots By Zoning District RR=1 / 14 _ erage Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: R-1 / 0.165 ac. / Floodplain Acreage -0- acres A Statement Addressing Any Differences Between The Final Plat And Approved Master Development Plan And/Or Preliminary Plat (If Applicable): None Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations & Reason For Same: None Requested Oversize Participation: None Total Linear Footage of Proposed Public: 1043 Streets (Alley) -0- Sidewalks 135 Sanitary Sewer Lines 115 Water Lines 156 Channels -0- Storm Sewers -0- Bike Lanes /Paths Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: ACREAGE: # of acres to be dedicated + 60 x $358 = $ development fee # of acres in floodplain # of acres in detention # of acres in greenways OR FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: # of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $ # of Multi-Family Dwelling Units X $452 = $ (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prepansd this application hereto ane true, correct and complete. The Station of the above-identified final plat an restrictions associated with this plat. h~I ,e~~c. Si~hature did l~itle' ~,a,~T ~~~,r,~ie u and ce~t~es that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached undersigned hereby n3quests approval by the City of College d attests that this request does not amend any covenants or l2 Z4 0 3 Date • • CONSENT AGENDA ITEM N0.3.3 Final Plat Krenek Crossing Q ~ J ~ Q ~ ~ z w U '~:" ~ Z O -.~ - w i= + O _ ~ (/') W U Q J a z a o ~ ~ _~ ~ ~ w a a d' b a - a ,`,2' s ° J 1J ~ = ~~~ fi ~' ~ ., Q ~' ~~ R ~ 17OS ~ ~ ~~~ r 0 ~yc~'~~ ~x^~~ e Q ~ ~ ~ ~ 'fir , ~ ~ b e ~ ti o ` ~ ~ a "') a 1 n h ~ ` ~ a ~. o ~ t~f ~ sp Rc ~' ~y e, -, _ ~~` fif ,~ ws 4 ,~ y ~~ s Z all N r (~ i O °a c~ zw U H ~ N Z NH Z Cw.~UW U O J m ~ pa U v Y ~~ .J~~J a~ W , Y b ~ ` ~1i~ ti ~ ~ y ~\ h b b 1 rj(• "l 1J ~ ,~ H ~ ~ h ti ~+ ~ „~ ~ , ^ ^ is '4, ' `Qi h h G~ ~ ~ ° ~`~y/y~.. 'fir e~N ~ ~ ~Wt6 _ _ 6 ri °` a b ., .., 1j h ~, ° 1J rr ~.. Q ^ ~. ~ ~ 1 J .~ ~ = ~ , ~ ~ °lj h °~ J .rte a C• p~' GZ e .. _ dm 1~~ ,r ~ ~ h ' ~ ~ y ` b ~ lpl f ~ H ~~ V h t O ~~ N ~ ~~ ~W Q W N MEMORANDUM January 27, 2004 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Carol Cotter Email: ccotter@cstx.gov SUBJECT: FINAL PLAT for KRENEK CROSSING Item: Consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for the Krenek Crossing Subdivision consisting of 47 lots on 7.41 acres located at the intersection of Krenek Tap Road and Dartmouth Drive. (03-00500312) Applicant: Randy French, agent for owner Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat with Staff Review Comments No. 2. Item Summary: This item is for the consideration of a final plat for an R1-A single family residential subdivision consisting of 47 lots on three cul-de-sac streets. Two of the cul-de-sac streets will have access from Dartmouth Drive. The third cul-de-sac intersects Krenek Tap Road. This final plat is in compliance with the zoning and subdivision regulations. Background: The preliminary plat of this property was approved prior to the adoption of the Unified Development Ordinance, which eliminated the R1-A zoning classification. The Parks Board approved parkland dedication as fee-in-lieu of land on September 10, 2002. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan shows this area to be medium density residential. The current zoning of the property as R-3 is in conformance with Land Use Plan. R1-A was a permitted use in R-3 districts when the preliminary plat was approved. The property has frontage on Dartmouth Drive, a minor arterial on the Thoroughfare Plan, and on Krenek Tap Road which is designated as a minor collector. Budgetary & Financial Summary: NA Attachments: 1. Area map 2. Application . 3. Staff Review Comments No. 2 4. Preliminary Plat 5. Copy of Plat on wall of Council Chambers • STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2 Project: KRENEK CROSSING (FP) - 03-00500312 • ENGINEERING As previously discussed, the storm sewer pipe needs to be covered by a public drainage easement. Change the Public Utility Easements located on Lots 9 and 10 of Block 1, Lots 9 and 10 of Block 2, and Lots 3 and 4 of Block 3 to Public Utility and Public Drainage Easements. Reviewed by: Carol Cotter Date: January 27, 2004 • FOR OFF CE USE ONLY P8Z CASE NO.: 1 ` DATE SUBMITTED: 1 - FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1`~ (Check one) ^ Minor ^ Amending (~f Final ^ Vacating ^ Replat (6300.00) (6300.00) (5400.00) (5400.00) (5600.00)• *Includes public hearing fee The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P8~Z Commission consideration. / MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: !/ Filing Fee (see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets - $55.00 per additional sheet / Development Permit Application Fee of $200.00 (if applicable). / Infrastructure Inspection Fee of $600.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed) ~ Application completed in full. ~ Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.) / One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and/or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable). ~ Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. ~/, A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. d Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable). '~ Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks 8~ Recreation Board, please provide proof of Date of Preapplication Conference: ~E OF SUBDIVISION: Krenek Crossing SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot & Block): Williams-Winder-King. Lot 6.7.8 . College Station. Texas. Southwest Corner of Dartmouth and Krenek Tap APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): Name: Greg Taggart Street Address: 2551 Texas Avenue South Ste. A City: College Station State: Texas Zip Code: 77840 Phone Number: (979) 693.5359 E-Mail Address: mdgcstxt~yahoo.com Fax Number: (979) 693.4243 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name: Stylecraft Builders, Inc. Street Address: 4112 State Highway 6 State: Texas Zip Code: 77845 Phone Number: (979) 690.1222 City: College Station E-Mail Address 'I Fax Number_~~ ~ o3~f8 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: • Name: Lenwood Adams, P.E. Street Address: 2551 Texas Avenue South Ste. A City: College Station State: Texas Zip Code: 77840 Phone Number. (979) 693.5359 E-Mail Address: mdgcstx(c~yahoo.com Fax Number. (979) 693.4243 6/13/03 1 of 5 Is there a temporary blanket easement on this property? If so, please provide the Volume and Page # Acreage ~ Total Property: 7.41 acres Total # Of Lots: 47 R-O-W Acreage: sting Use: Undeveloped Proposed Use: Residential ber Of Lots By Zoning District 47 Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: .157 ac /Lot Floodplain Acreage 0 A Statement Addressing Any Differences Between The Final Plat And Approved Master Development Plan And/Or Preliminary Plat (If Applicable): Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations 8~ Reason For Same: Requested Oversize Participation: Total Linear Footage of Proposed Public: 1000 Streets Sidewalks 8800 Sanitary Sewer Lines 1300 Water Lines N/A Channels 1100 Storm Sewers N/A Bike Lanes /Paths Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: ACREAGE: # of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee # of acres in floodplain # of acres in detention # of acres in greenways OR FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: # of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $ (date) Approved by Parks 8~ Recreation Board NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prBpared this application and cert~es that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto ars true, correct, and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above-identified final plat and attests that this request does not amend any covenants or restrictions associated with this plat. /~ ~ 2P~ S Sign re and itle ,9~~/,~ /~,-v~~~~~GI9~. ~ 7 ~~~~ X03 Date 6/13/03 2 of 5 t • AGENDA ITEM N0.4 Absence Requests • City of College Station Absence Request Form For Elected and Appointed Officers y Name: .A/Z~~~~ l ~l/i Request Submitted on: I will not be in attendance at the meeting of: -~.~,~ . ~~ ~aU for the reason(s) specified: (Date) • ~1„A~ (Signature) • This request shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board one-week rD ioT t0 meeting date. • City of College Station Absence Request Form For Elected and Appointed Officers Name: %G~ n IN I ~~H~HS Re uest Submitted on: ~130~11 q ~- ,. I will not be in attendance at the meeting of: ~J- ~ ~U for the reason(s) specified: (Date) • This request shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board one-week riot to meeting date. • AGENDA ITEM N0.6 Replat Benjamin Graham Subdivision Lot 2, Lots 1-5 of Block 3 Lots 1-3 of Block 1 \ i ~ T ~ i~ A ~ ~ ._, ~ ~~ J ~ ,; ,- ; ., _._ . , _. ,- -- t ~; ' ~. - ~ -- - ~ _.. ,_ 1, „. -- \ `~ y T\,~ .~ (~ ~ \~~' O '~ J \ .\\ FM2I154 ~ ~ r^ _ ~ ;, ~ Z % / ~ \~ ~ ~ ' ( / ~~ ~ t-~ ,\ ~, , X > \ /y ~ ~ / O ~ \ /~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ .. ~ ~ p~ ~ ~~ U W O ~0 U \~ ~/ ; . \ .. ~. \ MEMORANDUM January 27, 2004 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Carol Cotter Email: ccotter@cstx.gov SUBJECT: REPEAT -RESIDENTIAL for BENJAMIN GRAHAM SUBDIVISION, LOT 2 Item: Public hearing, discussion and possible action on a Replat for Benjamin Graham Subdivision Lots 1-5 of Block 3, Lots 1-3 of Block 1, and Lot 2, located along Koppe Bridge Road near Greens Prairie Road in the City's ETJ. (03- 00500154) Applicant: Garrett Engineering, agent Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends a royal of the Re lat as pp p submitted. Item Summary: This item is for the consideration of a Replat of Lots 1-5 of Block 3, Lots 1-3 of Block 1, and Lot 2 of Benjamin Graham Subdivision located in the City's ETJ. The lots were originally platted in 1894 and are located on Koppe Bridge Road west of the intersection of Wellborn Road and Greens Prairie Road. The original lots are being combined into 2 lots and a remainder tract. Each lot meets the minimum requirements for ETJ subdivisions. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: A portion of Koppe Bridge Road is a Minor Collector on the City's Thoroughfare Plan. Wellborn Road and Greens Prairie Road are designated a major arterial and major collector, respectively. Budgetary & Financial Summary: N/A Attachments: 1. Area map 2. Application 3. Copy of Plat on wall of Council Chambers • FOR OFFICE U~S~EIONLY P8Z Case No.: ~ 3 '~ Date Submitted: ~D" ~~J"~ 3 g~ 03Cdi'k FINAL PLAT APPLICATION ~ (Check one) ^ Amending ^ Final ^ Vacating ® Replat ($300.00) ($400.00) ($400.00) ($600.00)• 'Includes public hearing fee The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P8Z Commission consideration. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ® Final plat review and filing fee (see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets ~ $55.00 per additional sheet ^ Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations ~ $100 (if applicable) ^ Development permit fee of $200.00 (if applicable). ^ Infrastructure inspection fee of $600.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed) ® Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.) ^ One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and/or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable). ^ Paid tax cert~cates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. ^ A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. ^ Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable). ^ Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of NAME OF SUBDIVISION BENJAMIN GRAHAM SUBDIVISION 8~ WELLBORN PLAT SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot & Block) LOT 2 (Benjamin Graham Sub.) & LOTS 1-5. BLK.3 and LOTS 1.2 & 3 of BLK 1 and R.O.W. of (Wellborn Plat) APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): Name GARRETT ENGINEERING E-Mail ddQar[dZTxcyber.com Street Address .4444 Carter Creek Parkway, STE 108 City Brvan State TX Zip Code 77802 Phone Number (979) 846-2688 Fax Number (979) 846-3094 CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: (All owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet, if necessary) Name Bennie J. & Deborah A. Bins E-Mail Street Address 4296 Koppe Bridoe Road City College Station State TX Zip Code 77845 Phone Number (979) 690-0568 OR 690-6983 Fax Number ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name GARRETT ENGINEERING E-Mail ddoaKc~Txcvber.com ~treet Address 4444 Carter Creek Parkway. STE 108 City Brvan State TX Zip Code 77802 Phone Number (979) 846-2688 Fax Number (979) 846-3094 Acreage Total Property 25.1 Total # Of Lots Nine R-O-W Acreage N/A fisting Use: Residential Proposed Use: Residential umber Of Lots By Zoning District N/A / / / Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: / / / Floodplain Acreage N/A A Statement Addressing Any Differences Between The Final Plat And Approved Master Development Plan And/Or Preliminary Plat (If Applicable): N/A Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations & Reason For Same: N/A Requested Oversize Participation: N/A Total Linear Footage of Proposed Public: Streets Sidewalks Sanitary Sewer Lines Water Lines Channels Storm Sewers Bike Lanes /Paths Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: ACREAGE: # of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee # of acres in floodplain # of acres in detention OR # of acres in greenways FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: # of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $ # of Multi-Family Dwelling Units X $452 = $ (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prepared this application and cert~es that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above-ident~ed final plat and attests that this request does not amend any covenants or restrictions associated with this plat. r ~ ~ J °----_~~ p6~2o f a3 . AGENDA ITEM N0.7 Replat Randall's University Park Lot 3 ht M "~ ^ !J w ~ n .~ . t h u r :~ ~ V ^ ti h ' ~:: . O ~ ~ ~ b ^ ~ . h N ~ /~ ~ ` M r ~ ' b^ ~ ~: ~ ~ U ~o ~ ~ ah ~ $ ~ ~ ,~ ~ o ~ ~ a ~ m -,~ h ,~ .~ ie€iiiiii 5 w 1 S f. ~ i M i ~ : u d ,~~ h s .:r ,: b ~b b J o ~ h y G : h U ~ a ~ h ~J J ~- Z e LLa N O N M O U o '~ ~ ~. h C ~ O h Q O ~ ~ 4~ ~ n ~ ~ p _ b Rq ~ h ~ ~ ~ ` 6~h / ~ by S~ b h _ N .r~~'(GJ a e 1 ~~ 1 • ~ O eG2 )OJ r r~F h y; / !~ `'~\ ~ V ~ ~ „h ~ ^~ J h - 4'~ Q -, a ' ~i ° ~'' 0 h 0. SL w .y~~ c r w ti~ ~ Q )~~J e i 0 ~~ 1~~ tir N h X ~~ G• O> ~ ~ ~~ h 'G, e ~ H mZ • LOS- FO gV<JY • MEMORANDUM January 27, 2004 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Spencer Thompson Email: sthompson@cstx.gov SUBJECT: REPEAT for RANDALL'S UNIVERSITY PARK LOT 3 Item: Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Replat for the Randall's University Park Lot 3 consisting of 2 lots on 6 acres generally located at 505 Chimney Hill Drive. Applicant: MDG, Agent for Mr. Mickey Posey, Owner Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Replat as submitted • Item Summa :This item is for the consideration of a Re lat ' rY p of Lot 3 of Randall s University Park into Lots 3R -1 and 3R-2. As you may remember, this Replat went before the Commission at the 11/6/03 Planning and Zoning meeting. The Commission did not approve the Replat due to the fact that the Applicant did not meet the recommendation of the Parks Board by providing a Pedestrian Access Easement to the adjoining park. Since that time, the Applicant has worked out access to the park through Lot 3R-2. Heretofore, a citizen of College Station would have to travel to Bryan to Rosemary Drive, then down Sunny Lane in order to visit the park. Upon approval of this plat, a pedestrian from Cooper Addition will be able to walk north to the end of Cooper, turn west and approach the park by way of the dedicated access easement. A pedestrian from Chimney Hill will be able to walk south to the end of Chimney Hill Drive, walk along the east edge of Lot 3R- 2 toward Cooper and then west to the park. The park is .intended to be "developed" as a walking trails only park. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: Land Use Plan: Single-family, residential Thoroughfare Plan: Chimney Hill Drive is a residential street Parkland Dedication: The Board's recommendation is for the Applicant to pay the Development Fee and the fee in lieu of land dedication on the condition that public • access is granted from Chimney Hill Drive and Cooper Street. Open Space Dedication: None Attachments: 1. Area map 2. Application 3. Draft Minutes from parks Board meeting 4. Copy of Plat on wall of Council Chambers • LBridgette George -Fwd: Draft Motions -Attn: Alan Taylor & Greg Taggert __ _ _. Page 1~1 FYI Natalie Thomas Ruiz, AICP Development Manager City of College Station Phone (979) 764-3570 Fax (979) 764-3496 nruiz@cstx.gov www.ci.cotlege-station.tx. us College Station. Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future. »> Kris Lehde 12/10/2003 4:16:18 PM »> Dear Mr. Taylor, Per your request, please see below draft motions for the discussions concerning Randall's University Park and Southwest Park: Randalls (Item #5) -Glenn Schroeder made a motion to 1) accept the proposal to have the access easement on the replat coming from the end of the Chimney Hill Cul-de-sac, to the property line behind Albertsons, then back down to Madeley Park (along the Cooner Subdivision), 2) accept the cash dedication to meet the park land dedication requirements for the Randall's University Park Development, and 3) recommend that the City pursue the acquisition of the second lot (owned by Marcelino Diaz Barrera) as a park land addition to Madeley Park. Don Allison seconded the motion. All were in favor, and the motion passed unanimously (vote: 7-0). (Chairman John Nichols absent). Southwest Park (Item #7) -Glenn S. made a motion to accept and approve the conceptual plan for Southwest Park. Gary Erwin seconded the motion. All were in favor, and the motion passed unanimously (vote: 7-0). (Chairman John Nichols absent.) Jodi Warner made a second motion to dedicate park land dedication funds, not to exceed the amount of $90,000, for the development of Southwest Park. Larry Farnsworth seconded the motion. All were in favor, and the motion passed unanimously (vote: 7-0). (Chairman John Nichols absent). Please note that these motions are only in draft form until they are presented to the Board for approval at their regular meeting on January 13, 2004. Thank you. Kristin Lehde Staff Assistant College Station Parks & Recreation (9 79) 764-3414 • ~~ ~~ OILEGE STATION ~(e ~ ~~ J FOR OFFICE USE ONLY .~~ P8Z Case No.: G~ -•'ZD a Date Submitted: g ~ ! ~~ FINAL PLAT APPLICATION (Check one) ^ Amending ^ Final ^ Vacating - Replat ($300.00) ($400.00) ($400.00) (5600.00)" 'Includes public hearing fee The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P8Z Commission consideration. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: [Final plat review and filing fee (see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets ~ $55.00 per additional sheet ~' Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations ~ $100 (if applicable) Development permit fee of $200.00 (if applicable). I® Infrastructure inspection fee of $600.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed) [~ Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.) ~] One-(1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and/or one (1). Master Plan (if applicable). . [~ Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. [~ A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. ~ Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable). (~ Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks 8~ Recreation Board, please provide proof of approval (if applicable). L.oi 3 a~~DY t~~• NAME OF SUBDIVISION ~171~( L~ S C~ 111c/~~S (~"y QA~{,~- ,~' ~ SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot & Block) LD-I-3 ~'~T.I~-~'/t--- i~,`. ~'~ APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): ~~ TEA{-1~ Name ~rJ t.~ u?~l, Tit/~c.oPlycE~.ST Q~y P E-Mail ws.c~gG S t~ (-I Ca,Goo • Gales Street Address ~ 12~~ ( L-c~cNS l~lc- g. City Co([.~~{ ~.~z-w State t ~' Zip Code `775 Phone Number ~ ~~ G~3 -5351 Fax Numbe ~~~ ~oQ,3-~~3 CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: (All owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet, if necessary) ~P, Name ~1~4t~E[_ E. ~~A~~ ~` '~S~`~ E-Mail Street Address ~•o. (3aX, L~4d City CODE S'ra4~fto+-~ State ~ Zip Code ~~~ -1 n~ Phone Number ~ ~ ' a-4-11 Fax Number ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name __ ~/I,I~J~ Street Address _ ~~ I l ~~C d~•~ ~.- ~ity ~ (,(,~G~ '{-ICS;.. State Phone Number ,~~ ~~°( trig 3' ~ 3 S~ E-Mail u~ ~1. (,St'}GC.° ~(~~,ad ., loln..- Zip Code ~~ Fax Number ~~~~ v l3 - ~oZ-4. ~ -Aug-02 1 of 5 Acreage Total Property ~• ~~ 2~- Total # Of Lots ~- R-O-W Acreage ~"-~- Existing Use: lnAeA~'f Proposed Use: ~~sw~--~c~ - umber Of Lots By Zoning District a-- l ~= ~- l I ~verage Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: 3.~1~~- I I I Floodplain Acreage ~i . ~ ~'1 l~3'1 a,~ A Statement Addressing Any Differences Between The Final Plat And Approved Master_Development Plan And/Or Preliminary Plat (If Applicable): ~u l ~ Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations & Reason For Same: y ( g' Requested Oversize Participation: K~ ~-~ Total Linear Footage of Proposed Public: Streets Sidewalks Sanitary Sewer Lines ~~ Water Lines Channels Storm Sewers Bike Lanes /Paths Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: ACREAGE: # of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee # of acres in floodplain # of acres in detention # of acres in greenways OR ~ ~ ~~'?j ~SJN~/ FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:CPrtJ • (~~ ~oo~' ~~: # of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $ # of Multi-Family Dwelling Units X $452 = $ (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above-ident~ed final plat and attests that this request does not amend any covenants or restric 'ons associated with this plat. ~~~ Signature nd Title Date 1-Aug-02 2 of 5 • AGENDA ITEM N0.8 Rezoning 4506 State Highway 6 South E =, 9 E E r :• ° ~ R ~ E E i E C S E ~ m ? ~ ._ • V ~ E a ~ E E ~ ~ W ~ V ~ a II~ _ ~ ~ N W} g W -, ~ i ` a ' , ~ 2 w ~ E ~ m R ~ ^ ~ U ~~ a ~ , F 4 U W ~ Z K ! g ~. yZ~ U O W ~ ~. ~ ~ W '^ N W ~ N m' W J 1.l 7 '-U m d ~ O ~ ~ ~ Z ~ r~ l i _ ! ~ . . ~ F ? E W V N E ~ W J i w _ ~ S E E ! ~ L.1 a ~ d ~` w ~ a ~ci u ~~ H ~~ `~ e~ ~~~ ;- V 4~ t ~~ e t w V V a 4 ~~ M g oa ro .w C . ~ ~~ ~a m O t X F- W c) oW ~~ Z S1 Z N /W/~/ LL s'a~,~ _ ,,o- cr' : ~ O .. 1 ~ ~ A ~ W U R E E L i E a ~~ _ a ~ o Q ~.. R a ~/~ 1 _~, r U~ r . STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Jennifer Prochazka Date: January 27, 2004 Email: jprochazka@cstx.gov Item: Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a rezoning of 4506 State Highway 6 South, consisting of 9.22 acres, from A-O Agricultural Open to 3.61 acres of C-1 General Commercial and 5.61 acres of C-2 Commercial Industrial. (04-04) Applicant: Donald W. Jones, agent for Micheal A. Downey, property owner Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning. Item Summary: The applicant is requesting rezoning in order to develop the property. There is currently asingle-family home and barn on the subject property. The surrounding property is zoned A-O and developed as an electrical substation to the west, an oil well, cell tower, and large electric easement to the north, and a home to the south. Commercial and light industrial uses are more compatible with adjacent properties and the general area. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: AComprehensive Plan amendment was passed on January 8, 2004 designating this property and the surrounding area as Retail Regional. The land use study concluded that both C-1 and C-2 uses would be appropriate in this area because of the location of the property and the adjacent uses. The Thoroughfare Plan designates Highway 6 as a Freeway. Item Background: The property was annexed in 1983 and is currently zoned A- O. This property has never been platted. The property at the corner of Arrington Road and Highway 6 was zoned C-1 in 1983. An 11.46-acre tract, approximately 850 feet south of the subject property, was rezoned to C-1 in 1998. Since these two properties are zoned C-1, they will likely develop commercially. The electrical substation to the north and oil well were developed in 1991, and the cell tower to the north was constructed in 1994. Commission Action Options: The Commission acts as a recommending body on the question of rezoning, which will be ultimately decided by City Council. The Commission options are: • 1. Recommend approval as submitted; 2. Recommend a less intense zoning classification; • 3. Recommend denial; 4. Table indefinitely; or, 5. Defer action to a specified date. Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map 2. Application 3. Infrastructure and Facilities • • • INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES Water: Domestic water and fire flow capacity is not available on the west side of SH 6 in this area at this time. Extension of the City water system would be by way of Greens Prairie Road at Arrington or by boring across TxDOT ROW to the City Business Park. Sewer: This area is in the City's 97-02B Sewer Impact Fee Area. Access to the public sewer system is across SH 6 to the east or south to Nantucket. Streets: Access is limited to the two lane Highway 6 frontage road, which is anticipated to be one-way in the future. Hwy 6, is designated as a Freeway on the Thoroughfare Plan. If a driveway encumbers an adjacent lot from obtaining access in the future, an access easement may be required. Off-site Easements: Easements to obtain public water and sewer may be required. Drainage: Drainage is generally to a tributary of Alum Creek. The creek crosses SH 6, Lakeway Drive and connects with the branch of Alum Creek from Nantucket. Flood Plain: The FEMA floodplain has not been mapped along this creek on the west side of SH 6. The current FEMA study ends on the east side of the highway. Oversize request: None at this time. Impact Fees: These properties fall within the 97-02B Sewer Impact Fee Area. The fee is currently $243.38 per living-unit equivalent. NOTIFICATION: Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle: 1-20-04 and 2-10-04 Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 2-5-04 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: 2-26-04 Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': 6 Response Received: None as of date of staff report • A-O Agr[cultural-0oen: PURPOSE: This district includes lands within the corporate limits of the City, which are not subdivided and are relatively undeveloped. This district is designed to be applied to lead which is used for agricultural, very low-intensity residential, or open space uses, but which is projected in the Comprehensive Plan for conversion to more intensive urban uses at such time as community services are available and community needs for such uses are present. As such, it is a reserved area in which the future growth of the City can occur. USES: • 'Manufactured Home • Single-Family Detached • Educational Facility, Outdoor Instruction • 'Governmental Facilities • Parks • 'Places of Worship • Agricultural Use, Barn or Stable for Private Stock • Agricultural Use, Farm or Pasturage • Agricultural Use, Farm Product )?processing • 'Animal Cane Facility, Outdoor • "Commercial Gandeo/Greenhouse/L,and.4cape Maintenance • Country Club • Gold Course or Driving Range • 'Utility • 'Wireless Telecommunication Facilities -Intermediate • (C)Wireless Telecommunication Facilities -Major • Wireless Telecommunication Facilities -Unregulated C ~ General Commercial: PURPOSE: This district is designed to provide locations for general commercial purposes, that is, retail sales and service uses that function to serve the entire community and its visitors. USES: • Extended Care Facility/Convalescent/Nursing Home • Educational Facility, Indoor Instruction • Educational Facility, Outdoor Instruction • Educational Facility, Primary & secondary • Educational Facility, Tutoring • Educational Facility, Vocational/trade • Governmental Facilities • Health Care, Hospitals • Health Care, Medical Clinics • Parks • Places of Worship • Animal Care Facility, Indoor • Art Studio/Gallery • 'Car wash • 'Commercial G~rdeoJCmoenhouse/I.andscape Maintenance • 'Commercial Amusements • Confer+encclConvention Center • Country Club Day Care, Commercial • Drive-in/tl>ru Window • Dry Cleaners 8t Laundry • Fraternal Lodge • 'Fuel Sales • Funeral Homes • Golf Course or Driving Range • • health CIubJSports Facility,lndoor • Health Chrb/Sports Facility, Outdoor • Hotels • (Ckiight Club, Bar or Tavern • Offices • Parking as a Primacy Use • Personal Service Shop • Printing/Copy Shop • Radio/TV Station/Studios • Restaurants • Retail Sales -Single Tenant over 50,000 SF • Retail Sales and Service • Shooting Range, Indoor • Theater • Storage, Self Service • • Vehicular dales, Rental, Repair and Service • sUtility • 'Wireless Telecommunication Facilities -Intermediate • (C)Wireless Telecommunication Facilities -Major • Wireless Telecommunication Facilities -Unregulated C-2 Commerdal -Industrial: PURPOSE: This district is designed to provide a location for outlets ofl'ering goods and services to a limited segment of the general public. The uses included primarily serve other commercial and industrial enterprises. USES: • Extended Care Facility/Convalescent/Nucsing Home • Educational Facility, indoor h~struction • Educational Facility, Outdoor Instruction • Educational Facility, Primary dt Secondary • Educational Facility, T~rtoring • Educational Facility, VocationaVfrade • Governmental Facilities • Health Care, Hospitals • Health Care, Medical Clinics • Parks • Places of Worship • Animal Care Facility, Indoor • Animal Care Facility, Outdoor • 'Commercial Garden/GreenhouseJLandscape Maintenance • 'Commercial Amusements • Conference/Convention Center • Country Club • Dry Cleanas/L,auodry • Fraternal Lodge • Funeral Homes • Golf Course or Driving Range • Offices • Parking as a Primary Use • Printing/Copy Shop • Radio/T'V Station/Studios • 'Sexually Oriented Business • Shooting Range, Indoor • Storage, Self Service • 'Vehicular sales, Rental, Repair and Service • Wholesale~/Services • Bulk Storage Tanks/Cold Storage Plant • Industrial, Light • 'Recycling Facility -Large • Scientific Testing/Research Laboratory • Storage, Outdoor -Equipment or Materials • 'Utility • warehousing/Distnffiutian • •Wirdess Tdeoommunic~tion Facilities - Inte~ate • (C)WirelessTda~mmcmicatibnFacilities-Major • Wireless Telecommunication Facilities - Um+egrilated D~f-0`~ f January 2, 004 • Mlchael A. Downey 2101 Entlold Rd. Auadn, TX 78703 (512)'62-1244 (312) 23Q-0787 Fax To Whom li! May Concern: Donald W. ones, who resides at 804 Berry Creek, College Station, Texae 7i 845 is rti agent for the sale of my 9.22 acre tract located at 4506 Stele Highway 8 auth in College Station. Mr. Jones is instructed to handle rezoning matters tha will assist in property entitling this property as required by the existing Pu ;;tease Agreement under which the property is due to be sold. 1 hereby gr~nt to Donald W Jones a Limited Power of Attorney to ect upon my txrtialt and xecute the praaed~re listed below: - Pre ration and submission of a Zoning Map Amendment Application to the ~ of College Station for the purpose of rotoning this property from Agr' ulture Open District (A-0) to Commercial Districts C-1 and C•2. This autho nation shall expire at 5 p.m May 1, 2004 Pease dire 't any questions to me at the address above or by calling me at (512) 762-1244. , S:ncere'~~ l Mlchael • FOR OFFICE US~ONLY ' CASE NO. DATE SUBMITTED • ' ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING) APPLICATION MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shalL.not be filed within a period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with permission of the Planning & Zoning Commission or City Cou il. The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for consideration: Application completed in full. _$500.00 application fee /Two (2) copies of a fully dimensioned map on 24" x 36" paper showing: a. Land affected; b. Legal description of area of proposed change; c. Present zoning; d. Zoning classfication of all abutting land; and e. All public and private rights-of--way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land. Written legal description of subject property (metes & bounds or lot 8 block of subdivision, whichever is pplicable). ~he Rezoning Supporting Information sheet completed in full. Date of Required Preapplication Conference: APPLICANTS INFORMATION: . Name Dona d W Jones ~- StreetAddress __ 804 RPrr~ Croak Clty _~.Q1 1 [p~~ Stai-inn State TX _ Zip Code 77845 ~~____ E-Mail Address d~bnes@ ca net ~__ Phone Number 979-696-6600 Fax Number 979-696-3040 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name Michael A Downey _~ Street Address 2101 Enfield Rd. city _Au s t i n State _~ Zip Code __~ 8 7 0 8-- _~ E-Mail Address mdowneyl@austin. rr. com __ _~ _~__ Phone Number 512-762-1244 Fax Number 5L2-?36-0787 ---- This property was conveyed to owner by deed date rch 3~.~19 S land recorded in Volume 513-, Page 2 5 7 of the Brazos County Deed Records. General Location of Property: State Hi wad 6 Snt~th ~ C`nl 1 arra Gtat i nn f mx _ Address of Property: 4506 State Hi ghway ~ Rnnth :- eni 1 alp St~tionT Tx Legal Description: 9 22 Acres, S ~ Robertson L.eag~.~. Aba _ a _ 0 .._$ra~cG Cn111ty Acreage -Total Property: 9 ~ 2 At~rag --- • Existing Zoning: A-O Proposed Zoning: ~-1 a nA C- ~ Present Use of Property: Rc?ci d _n~~& [_nmm[~rr~i a 1 Stnra~a _ Proposed Use of Property: Retail & Warehouse 6/13/03 Page 1 of 2 REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION ~.) List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. Adiacent properties have developed with non-residential uses that are not compatible with single family neighborhoods. 2.) Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. she Plan was recently submitted for amendment to Regional Retail and was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. List an other reasons to su ort ' Y pp this zone change. This change supports the Land Use Plan strategy of concentrating _commercial development at or near major intersections. The applicant has prepared this application and supporting information and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correct. IF APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A POWER OF ATTORNEY STATEMENT FROM THE OWNER. ., ~~~~ Signature of caner (o agent) or applicant Date • s~~ aros Page 2 of 2 AGENDA ITEM NO.9 • Rezoning Fairhaven Cove Z N W ~. ~ y6 ~' ~~G Zt'~ O ' 4 O '~ M ~, - ('~ O s,.+~ ~ ~ ~'°~''°~ cap ~,``~' ~~r c) Y fi i~~ ~ ^ -. 4 _ _ ,~ •m a _ _ ,a" y6S ~ `W` r ~ I ~\G~ U ~~^ 3 ~~0.~ ~~ 1 • 1 o ' ~ ~ ~ • Q ~ ., LL ~~ ~-s ~'` ~ ~ °` w .= a ~ ~' tV s ,~ ~ ~ s n ~ M1 ,t~ R h N ^ _ g$ Y ^ ~ zS ~ v e w _ ~ ~~++ ~ ~ ~ ~ Y ~ ~ _ ~~Z 1E ,,, ~ N Y7,gps ^ p _ ~" .` ~ ~ i ~ Q R ~ ~ , ~ ~ U~ +~ 3 fi ~ • STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Jennifer Reeves Date: 01-22-04 Email: jreeves@cstx.gov Item: Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Rezoning for Fairhaven Cove consisting of 12 lots on a 1.81 acre tract located in the Nantucket Subdivision off of Nantucket Drive. Applicant: City of College Station Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the zone request from A-O Agricultural Open to R-1 Single Family. Item Summary: Attached is a memorandum from Jane Kee (City Planner) to the Planning & Zoning Commission from November of 2002 that helps explain some of the history on the subject property. December of 2002 the Planning & Zoning Commission directed staff to initiate the rezoning process for the Nantucket area. • Essentially the subject property was annexed into the city limits as A-O Agricultural Open. The lot area requirement for A-O is a 5-acre minimum. To bring the lots into compliance with the lot area requirements as well as the Comprehensive Plan that shows this area as Single Family (medium density), Staff is recommending approval of the zone change. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Comprehensive Plan shows this area as Single Family (medium density). The cul-de-sac takes access off of Nantucket Drive, which is considered a minor collector on the Thoroughfare Plan. Item Background: The subject property was annexed into the City of College Station in November of 2002 and currently is not platted. Commission Action Options: The Commission acts as a recommending body on the question of rezoning, which will be ultimately decided by City Council. The Commission options are: 1. Recommend approval of rezoning as submitted; 2. Recommend a less intense zoning classification; 3. Recommend denial; 4. Table indefinitely; or, • 5. Defer action to a specified date. R: WTLTRI PZLTRI PRODI PZ20031 P0009113. DOC Created on 128J21)04 3:34 PM • Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map 2. Infrastructure and F 3. Memorandum to Pla 4. P&Z Minutes Decem • acilities nning & Zoning Commission November 27, 2002 ber 12, 2002 • R: WTLTRI PZLTRI PRODI PZ20031 P0009113. DOC Created on 1/28/7004 3:34 PM INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES Water: Wellborn Water Supply has served the property since before it was annexed. If adequate fire coverage becomes an issue there is an 8-inch City water line that could be extended 1400 feet down Nantucket Drive to serve this property. Sewer: Sewer service is provided by a private sanitary sewer treatment plant located in the area. There is a 6-inch sewer impact fee line located approximately 1400 feet down Nantucket Drive that could be extended to the property. Streets: Nantucket Drive is classified as a Minor Collector on the City's Thoroughfare Plan. Off-site Easements: No offsite easements are required at this time. Drainage: Future development on this property is required to comply with the City's Drainage Policy and Design Standards. Flood Plain: No floodplain appears on the subject property. Oversize request: N/A Impact Fees: This property is located just outside of the Sewer Impact Fee • Area 97-02B. NOTIFICATION: Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle: 01-20-04 and 02-10-04 Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 02-05-04 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: 02-26-04 Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': 15 Response Received: None as of date of staff report R:WTLTRI PZLTRI PRODI PZ20031 P0009113. DOC Created on 1/28/2004 3:34 PM - MEMORANDUM TO: Planning & Zoning Commission ~_. FROM: Jane R Kee, City Planner RE: City Initiated Rezoning DATE: November 27, 2002 There is a cul-de-sac in Nantucket that was annexed recently that has never been platted. The developer of Nantucket apparently sold properties by metes and bounds on a private street called Fairhaven Cove. There are twelve (12) "lots" on this street. Homes were built on all but 2 or 3 "lots" prior to annexation. One home was under construction during annexation and one home is preparing for a building permit presently. I have very little information as to why the small development was never platted. It should have been the developer's responsibility. Now the homes are occupied by mostly retired folks. Though the development was never platted, the staff feels it would be unfair to hold permits and penalize two individual owners for the action or lack of action by another. There fore, the City will be doing what is necessary to bring forward a final plat to remedy the situation. The property is zoned A-O and the "lots" do not meet the A-O minimum five (5) acre requirement. Therefore, it is necessary to bring forward a rezoning to R-1 single family along with the plat. The staff is requesting that the P&Z initiate this so that the rezoning process can begin. • MINUTES n U Planning and Zoning Commission WORKSHOP MEETING CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS December' 12, 2002 5:30 P.M. • COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: COMMSSIONERS ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: STAFF PRESENT: Staff Planners Hitchcock, Flanery, and Reeves, Assistant City Engineer McCully, Graduate Engineers Thompson and Cotter, Assistant City Attorney Nemcik, Director of Development Services Templin, Development Review Manager Ruiz, Assistant Development Review Manager George, Transportation Planner Fogle, Senior Planner Battle, City Planner Kee, Development Services Secretary Macik, and Staff Assistant Hazlett. Chairman Floyd called the meeting to order at 5:30 p. m. AGENDA ITEM NO.1: Discussion and consideration of the proposed Unified Development Code. Development Services Director Templin announced the Joint Workshop Meeting scheduled for December 13. He explained that an additional set of comments from the Development Community has been received and those concerns addressed. AGENDA ITEM N0.2: Status update regarding futare transportation projects planned and developed by the Tezas Department of Transportation. Transportation Planner Fogle gave the Commission an update on roadway and interchange projects and the MPO (Metropolitan Planning Organization) Adoption List for Bryan/College Station. Commissioners Floyd, McMath, Trapani, Hall, Shafer, Williams, and White. None. None. AGENDA TI'EM N0.3: Discussion, consideration, and possible action to initiate a rezoning request in the Nantucket area for the ezisting lots on Fairhaven Cove from A-O Agricultural Open to R iSingle-Family Residential. P&Z Minutes December 12, 2002 Page 1 oj2 Commissioner Trapati motioned to direct staff to initiate the rezoning process for the Nantucket area. Commissioner White seconded the motion. The motion carried 7-0. • FOR: Floyd, White, Trapani, Shafer, Hall, Williams, and McMath. AGAINST: None. AGENDA ITEM N0.4: Status on the code enforcement efforts pertaining to: • Lone Star Golf Academy at 2301 Earl Rudder Freeway • Ram Fence Company at 1726 Harvey Mitchell Parkway South Development Review Manager Ruiz reported that Staff is working with the owners on these locations to bring their properties into code. Referencing the properties on Baron Road, which was discussed at an earlier P&Z meeting, Ms. Ruiz stated that the Barron Road locations are currently under code enforcement. She added that if these properties are not brought into code that the city will move forward with condemnation. AGENDA ITEM NO. S: Status on the Project Review Committce's meeting schedule. Ms. Ruiz reported that at the request of the Commission, the PRC/DRB meetings will be held prior to the P&Z Workshops. She explained that with the adoption of the new UDO the make-up of that board will change and the time for those meetings will be re-accessed. AGENDA ITEM N0.6: Discussion of agenda items. Agenda Items 8 and I2 will be moved forward on the agenda. • Graduate Civil Engineer Cotter pointed out a change to Consent Agenda Item 3.3. AGENDA ITEM N0.7: Minor and amending plats approved by Staff. None. AGENDA ITEM N0.8: Future agenda items. The Commission requested that plats not be included with the meeting packets. AGENDA ITEM N0.9: Adjourn. Commissioner Trapani motioned to adjourn the meeting and seconded by Commissioner McMath. The motion carried 7-0. The meeting adjourned. FOR: Floyd, White, Trapani, Shafer, Hall, Williams, and McMath. AGAINST: None. APPRO (VED: ~ l ~ ~ C an, R c F oy ATTES • e assn ett P&Z Mlnt~tes December 12, 2002 Page 2 of 2 • • A-O. Agricultural-Open: PURPOSE: This district includes lands within the corporate limits of the City, which are not subdivided and are relatively undeveloped. This district is designed to be applied to land which is used for agricultural, very low-iirtensity residential, or open space uses, but which is projected in the Comprehensive Plan for conversion to more intensive urban uses at such time as community services are available and community needs for such uses are present. As such, it is a reserved area in which the future growth of the City can occur. USES: • *Manufactured Home • Single-Family Detached • Educational Facility, Outdoor Instruction • *Governmental Facilities • Parks • *Places of Worship • Agricultural Use, Barn or Stable for Private Stock • Agricultural Use, Farm or Pasturage • Agricultural Use, Farm Product Processing • *Animal Care Facility, Outdoor • *Commercial Garden/Greenhouse/Landscape Maintenance • Country Club • Gold Course or Driving Range • *Utility • *Wireless Telecommunication Facilities - Intermediate • (C)Wireless Telecommunication Facilities - Major • Wireless Telecommunication Facilities - Unregulated R-1 Single-Family Residential: PURPOSE: This district includes lands planned for single-family residential purposes and aoDessory uses. This district is designed to accommodate sufficient, suitable residential neighborhoods, protected and/or buffered from incompatible uses, and provided with necessary and adequate facilities and services. USES: • Single-Family Detached • Educational Facility, Primary & Secondary • *Governmental Facilities • Parks • *Places of Worship • Country Club • *Utility • Wireless Telecommunication Facilities - Unregulated • • AGENDA ITEM NO. 10 Rezoning • Shenandoah • ~ ~ ci Y ~ ~ W ~ '~ t V p 4 ~ `g ~ L ~~~ r~ Y ~ ~I~I~ O to r M O 0 a R t t Q Q WT 'i'^ V/ ~ _ ~ c_ ~ _ , ° _~ o ~ ,~ : = u w Z h ' ~ w X H W ~~ NZ m U~ ~ U ~ i • STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Jennifer Prochazka Date: January 27, 2004 Email: jprochazka@cstx.gov Item: Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a rezoning for a future phase of Shenandoah consisting of 39.943 acres located west of Southern Plantation Drive from A-O Agricultural Open to R-1 Single Family Residential. Applicant: Ed Froehling, Property Owner Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning as submitted. Item Summary: The applicant is requesting this rezoning in order to prepare the property for single family development. The southern most portion of this property will remain A-O in order to preserve the floodplain. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The property is surrounded by R-1 and A-0 that is shown for Single Family Residential on the Land Use Plan. This property has access to Southern Plantation Drive and Barron Road, which is shown as a minor arterial on the Thoroughfare Plan. This property will be bound on the southwest by the future extension of Newport Lane across Barron Road. Item Background: The property was annexed in 1995 and zoned A-O at that time. The property has never been platted. Commission Action Options: The Commission acts as a recommending body on the question of rezoning, which will be ultimately decided by City Council. The Commission options are: 1. Recommend approval of rezoning as submitted; 2. Recommend a less intense zoning classification; 3. Recommend denial; 4. Table indefinitely; or, 5. Defer action to a specified date. Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map 2. Application 3. Infrastructure and Facilities . INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES Water: Water extensions will be required as development occurs. Sewer: Sewer extensions will be required as development occurs. Streets: This property has access to Southern Plantation Drive and Barron Road, which is shown as a minor arterial on the Thoroughfare Plan. This property will be bound on the southwest by the future extension of Newport Lane across Barron Road. Off-site Easements: None known to be needed at this time. Drainage: West area: Drainage is generally to the Spring Creek floodplain. East area: Drainage is generally to a tributary of Spring Creek. Flood Plain: The floodplain is mapped to the subject property. The Land Use Plan shows the greenway along the floodplain. Oversize request: None at this time. Impact Fees: The subject area is located in the 97-011mpact Fee Area. • The current fee is $349.55 per Living Unit Equivalent. NOTIFICATION: Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle: 1-20-04 and 2-10-04 Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 2-5-04 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: 2-26-04 Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': 26 Response Received: None as of date of staff report • • • A-0. Agricultural-0pen• PURPOSE: This district includes lands within the corporate limits of the City, which are not subdivided and are relatively undeveloped. This district is designed to be applied to land which is used for agricultural, very low-intensity residential, or open space uses, but which is projected in the Comprehensive Plan for conversion to more intensive urban uses at such time as community services are available and community needs for such uses are present. As such, it is a reserved area in which the future growth of the City can occur. USES: • *Manufactured Home • Single-Family Detached • Educational Facility, Outdoor Instruction • *Governmental Facilities • parks • *Places of Worship • Agricultural Use, Barn or Stable for Private Stock • Agricultural Use, Farm or Pasturage • Agricultural Use, Farm Product Processing • *Animal Care Facility, Outdoor • *Commercial Ganien/GreenhouselLandscape Maintenance • Country Club • Gold Course or Driving Range • *Utility • *Wireless Telecommunication Facilities - Intermediate • (C)Wireless Telecommunication Facilities - Major • Wireless Telecommunication Facilities - Unregulated R-1 Sint~Family Residential: PURPOSE: This district includes lands planned for single-family residential purposes and accessory uses. This district is designed to acvommodate sufficient, suitable residential neighborhoods, protected and/or buffered from incompatible uses, and provided with necessary and adequate facilities and services. USES: • Single-Family Detached • Educational Facility, Primary & Secondary • *Governmental Facilities • parks • *Places of Worship • Country Club • *Utility • Wireless Telecommunication Facilities - Unregulated • MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application fior rezoning shall not be filed within a period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with permission of the Planning 8~ Zoning Commission or City Council. The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for consideration: _1~ Application completed in full. n~a $500.00 application fee (previously sutxnitted in June, 2003, but; pulled fran agenda) -~ Two (2) copies of a fully dimensioned map on 24" x 36" paper showing: a. Land affected; b.~ Legal description of area of proposed change; c. Present zoning; d. Zoning classification of all abutting land; and e. All public and private rights-of-way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land. ~. Written legal description of subject property (metes ~ bounds or bt ~ block of subdivision, whichever is applicable). -X The Rezoning Supporting Information sheet completed in full. FO O FlCE U$E.~NLY CASE NO. ! ,III' S DATE SUBMITTED ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING) APPLICATION Gj: ~p ~ Date of Required Preapplication Conference: June 10, 2003 and November 10, 2003 APPLICANT'S INFORMATION: Name _ ID_ FROgII,ING BUILDIIt, INC. Street Address 3887 High Lonesane City College Station _ State ~ Zip Code E-Mail Address 77845 Phone Number 774-05~-_- Fax Number 774-0565 - ---_--_ PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: Name --sam~~._applicant~ --- --_-- --- Street Address - City State Zip Code E-Mail Address Phone Number -- __Fax Number _ _ -_--_ This property was conveyed to owner by deed dated 3/4/2002 & and recorded in Volume 4514 , Pa e -~~6T~- 9 14 of the Brazos County Deed Records. and Volume 4248, Page 144 General Location of Property: West of Shenandoah Phases 7A & 7B & alone S.H. No. 6 Address of Property: _none Legal Description: 39.943 acres~.34'f acres and~_1D7 acre Acreage -Total Property: -45, 385 acres Existing Zoning: A-0 and A-P Proposed Zoning: R-1, A-P and C-1 Pn3sent Use of Property. .undeveloped Proposed Use of Property: single familyfamily residential~fessional office and oommPxcialoffice and oocnnPxcial sn~ ~~~z REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION .) List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary. The continued growth of residential property at the south end of College Station and the purchase of this property by the owner/developer of SHENANDOAH SUBDIVISION has made this property ideal for residential development like, the ~~y along G_H_ tJo 6 is ideal for caYmercial/office. 2.) Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not, explain why the Plan is incorrect. This zone change is in compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Plan 3.) List any other reasons to support this zone change. SHENANDOAH SUBDIVISION has been a very successful subdivision in southern College Station This development will extend the subdivision to the south and continue the omanized growth of the Citv of College The applicant has prepared this application and supporting information and ce-fifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and con8ct. 1F APPLICATION IS FILED BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER(S) OF THE PROPERTY, APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A POWER OF ATTORNEY STATEMENT FROM THE OWNER. c ~gnature of owner (or agent) or applicant - // 0 3 Date u AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 Variance Request and Preliminary Plat Villas of Harvey • } Q Z_ J W a g X d ~ HW ~b rr ~ W •4' ~ N~ ~~ ci m Z -a w U~ U~ sow w wus.w ~e '4L~ 4t STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Jennifer Reeves Email: jreeves@cstx.gov Date: December 11, 2003 Item: Consideration, discussion, and possible action on: 1) a variance request to Section 8-G.6 of the Subdivision Regulations concerning the number of lots on a cul-de-sac and 2) a Preliminary Plat for the Villas of Harvey consisting of 578 lots on 113 acres generally located near the northwestern corner SH 30 and FM 158. Applicant: Morris Hamilton, Developer Staff Recommendations: If the Commission rules in favor of the variance request, Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat. If the Commission denies the variance request, the plat shall be denied. Item Summary: This preliminary plat consists of one, 7.367-acre tract on FM 158 that is zoned C-1 General Commercial and 290 residential lots on approximately 106 acres off of SH 30 zoned PDD. The residential development is planned for two phases. Section 8-G.6 of the Subdivision Regulations states: • Cul-de-sacs shall have twenty-four (24) or fewer lots, and shall terminate in a turnaround not less than one hundred feet (100') in diameter, with a pavement diameter of eighty feet (80'). Because each housing unit is proposed for an individually platted lot, the allowable number of lots on a cul-de-sac is being exceeded. Morning Glory Court has (28) twenty eight lots proposed and Moon Flower Court has (32) thirty two lots proposed. If the units were platted on joint lots, as is typical of duplexes, a variance would not be necessary. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: This property was rezoned on September 23, 2003 to PDD and a concept plan was approved October 24, 2003. The Design Review Board approved the following concepts for the development: ^ A decorative main entry with water features from Harvey Road (contingent upon approval of the design by the Army Corps of Engineers) ^ Allowable building heights from 15 to 35 feet. ^ Building setbacks as follows: Front: 20' minimum, 25' maximum Side: 5' Side street: 12.5' Rear: 15' ^ Lot dimensions as follows: Minimum lot area: 3500 square feet Minimum lot width: 32' at setback / 21' at the right-of--way. ^ Access easements to the parks, open space and property to the west. The proposed preliminary plat meets the approved concept plan. Budgetary & Financial Summary: Oversize participation is requested for the 12-inch waterline along the collector streets and for the sanitary sewer. Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map 2. Application 3. Infrastructure and Facilities 4. Copy of Preliminary Plat INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES Water required for plat: Water Service: Sewer required for plat: Sewer Service: Street(s) required for plat: Streets/Access: Off-site Easements required for plat: Drainage: Flood Plain: Oversize request: See Budgetary and Financial Summary Section. Impact Fees: Parkland Dedication Fees: r ~ U FOR O22FFIC~~E,,U~~S.~E~ONLY P&Z Case No: ~ J /~/C/~10 Date Submitted: ~~ ~~?"~3 PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION (check one) ^ Preliminary Plat [aster Preliminary Plat The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for Planning 8~ Zoning Commission consideration. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: [~ Filing Fee of $400. Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations - $100 (if applicable) Application completed in full. Q Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A revised mylar original must be submitted after staff review.) One (1) copy of the approved Master Development Plan or Master Preliminary Plat if applicable. © A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. Rezoning Application if zone change is proposed. Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of approval (if ap livable). rC~ oN pc~o%cf I f- Zao3 ~` a vio~5 ~u.b~i AME OF SUBDIVISION ~~ ~, ~ S 0 a~11/~1 SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION ('orv-,Px' o~l~~ ?~ ~ ~M f 5~ APPLICANT/PROJECT,, LMANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): Name morYi S t'i~nr ~~ E-Mail V-IGt.MYII (fin ~ -m~ - der • COW7 Street Address ,~ l ~J I ~~ ~.r<~r~ S~ ~I Iri V>/ ~~e I ~ ~ Ciry State ~( Zip Code ~~D Z Phone Num er - - - Fax Number q~-1 ?S~ - ~0`~ PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: (ALL owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple owners): Name E-Mail Street Address H- N Or-!'~~n ~1' D ~J' l~_~` X~~ ~-- City ~ A jn -~~ D State ~ Zip Code ~ aZ( (~ Phone Number ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Name "1~XGO~I Fax Number E-Mail ~cP_5>~'1Lt_«~ f~ -~'QX.Coy1.Y1~~ Street Address ~ ID I (~1rQX1Q.IM KtY.iA /~ " City CEiI~T_ ~~ ~an State ~. Zip Code 1~8~5 Phone Number 11 l -1~O -1"I ~'3 Fax Number 7~' ~(op -~~j ~-Aug-o2 i or a Total Acres Of Subdivision ,ZOL R-O-W Acreage ZO•~SZ- Total # Of Lots ~ 1 Number Of Lots By Zoning District 2RU l ~ I / '~ / Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: Q 22 / 7 Floodplain Acreage, Parkland dedication by acreage or fee? /k[' ~.DI~ A statement addressing any differences between the preliminary plat and approved master development plan and/or master preliminary plat (if applicable): 1J/D- Requested variances to subdivision regulations 8~ reason for same ~lAi I~ i~ Sr~~aatl~ ~ ~o~ w,d•~5 c~ Phl~ Re nested oversize artici ation " w ~- ~~~ q P P ~?~~u~~ttL~ cote .~ +s ~ ~ rya S~t u/u'' ,J Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: ACREAGE: # of Acres to be dedicated ~ # of acres in floodplain # of acres in detention 0 # of acres in greenways OR FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: # of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $ (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correct. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the above identified plat and attests that all respective owners have been identified on this application. ignature and Title Iv / 27 ~0 3 Date 1-Aug-02 2 of 4