HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/02/2004 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning CommissionFILE COPY
U
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION
• September 2, 2004
Workshop Meeting - 6:00 P.M.
Regular Meeting - 7:00 P.M.
•
College Station
Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future
AGENDA
Workshop Meeting
Planning and Zoning Commission
Thursday, September 2, 2004, at 6:00 p.m.
Administrative Conference Room, City Hall
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas
i. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items.
2. Update and discussion regarding a pending Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the
City's Thoroughfare Plan for the extension of Appomattox from the Windwood
Subdivision to Horse Haven Lane.
3. Update and discussion regarding a pending Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the
area generally described as Pebble Creek Subdivision.
4. Discussion of minor and amending plats approved by Staff.
• Griffin-Atlas Subdivision (04-190)
•
5. Discussion of the Blue Ribbon Committee report.
6. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning
Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A
statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be
given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an
agenda for a subsequent meeting.
7. P~Rning & Zoning Commission Calendars:
Agenda Planning Calendar as of August 27, 2004
September 16 Workshop meeting at 5:00 p.m. to discuss connectivity and city
initiated rezonings.
September 23 Joint meeting with City Council to discuss city-initiated
rezonings and connectivity issues.
October 13-16 American Planning Association State Conference -Austin
r~
8. Adjourn.
Consultation with Attorney {Gov't Codle Section 551.0711 : possible action.
The Planning and Zoning Commission may seek advice from its attomey regarding a pending and rnntemplated litigation
subject or attorney-client privileged information. After executive session discussion, any final action or vote taken will be
in public. If litigation or attorney-client privileged information issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this Planning
and Zoning Commission meeting, an executive session will be held.
This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicapped parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service
must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call 979-764-3517 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989.
Agendas posted on Internet Website httu://www.cstx.aov and Cable Access Channel 19.
P&Z Workshop Agenda September 2, 2004
Pageiofi
• ~
College Station
Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future
AGENDA
Regular Meeting
Planning and Zoning Commission
Thursday, September 2, 2004, at 7:00 p.m.
Council Chambers, College Station City Hall
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas
1. Hear Citizens. At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to
address the Commission on planning and zoning issues not already scheduled on
tonight's agenda. The citizen presentations will be limited to three minutes in order
to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow
adequate time for completion of the agenda items. The Commission will receive
the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on
a future agenda for discussion. (A recording is made of the meeting; please give
your name and address for the record.)
All matters listed under Item 2, Consent Agenda, are considered to be routine by the
Planning and Zoning Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include
preliminary and final plats, where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision
regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff
recommendations. There will not be separate discussion of these items. If any
Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda, it will be moved to the
• Regular Agenda for further consideration.
2. Consent Agenda.
2.1 Consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for the
Putz-Meyer Place Subdivision, consisting of 2 lots on 14.7 acres, generally
located along the southern side of University Drive, across from the
intersection of University Drive and Tarrow Street East. (04-122)
2.2 Consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for the
Cotten Subd+vision consisting of 8 lots on 26 acres generally located at 2400
Harvey Mitchell Parkway South. (04-185)
2.3 Consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for Horse
Haven Estates Phase II, consisting of 58 lots on 16.44 acres, generally
located on the east side of Earl Rudder Freeway, south of State Highway 30.
(04-193)
2.4 Consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for the The
Gardens consisting of 2 lots on 7 acres generally located on Wellborn Road
near McCullough Road, south of Barron Road Cut-off in the City's ET7. (04-
104)
• 3. Consideration, discussion and possible action on request(s) for absence from
meetings.
P&Z Agenda September 2, 2004 Page 1 of 2
4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent
Agenda by Commission action.
•
•
l~
u
5. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Master Plan for Dove Crossing,
consisting of 97.94 acres, generally located along the south side of Graham Road,
across from the intersection of Graham Road and Schaffer Road. (04-189)
6. Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Variance Request to Section 18
of the Subdivision Regulations and a Replat for Richards Subdivision Lot li
consisting of 2 lots on 0.25 acres generally located at 201 Richards Street. (04-177)
7. Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on an ordinance to rezone 67.69 acres
south of Royal Adelade Dr. and west of future Pebble Creek Parkway and 76.8 acres
south of Royal Adelade Dr. and east of future Pebble Creek Parkway from A-O
Agricultural Open to R-1 Single Family Residential. (04-183)
8. Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on the annual review of the City's
UDO (Unified Development Ordinance) and Comprehensive Plan. The Commission
will consider amendments to Articles 1 - ii of the UDO including but not limited to
development regulations, parking requirements, specific use standards, and platting
procedures. (04-187)
9. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning
Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A
statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be
given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an
agenda for a subsequent meeting.
10. Adjourn.
Consultation with Attorney ~fdov't Coda Section 551.071} ; oossibie action.
The Planning and Zoning Commission may seek advice from its attorney regarding a pending and contemplated litigation
subject or attorney-client privileged information. After executive session discussion, any final action or vote taken will be
in public. If litigation or attorney-client privileged information issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this Planning
and Zoning Commission meeting, an executive session will be held.
This building is wheelchair accessible. Handicapped parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service
must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements calf 979-764-3517 or (TDD) i-800-735-2989.
Agendas posted on Internet Website httu://www.cstx.aov and Cable Access Channel 19.
P&Z Agenda
September 2, 2004
Page2of2
•
CQNSENT AGENDA ITEM NO.2.1
Preliminary Plat
Putz-Meyer Place Subdivision
t
~ _ ~ofi o ~ ~ ,~ ~
1 ~ a o/ ono °j m N ~ ~, ~~~ v
!a ~ S h ~ v
`° ~ h t~O' ,~ ~ `w ~P a J d
ti ~, ~ b b ~~ to ~ h ~~ °p ~~b W
~t y ~ '~ r ~ '~ ~~i ~ a ~ ~NL
~~ , b ~ ^ ~ ~J v a
'~ ~ N ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ b J
,p
12~ ! ry a G~ ¢.o ~P~p h
~Q h o ~ ~O
~ ~ ~ ~ tb ~J~~ b 1
hQ q Lfi 9 ~ `~, \8~
J^I q~
o ' ~ ~ .~,
~o~ ~ Z
a o O w ,~ ry W ~ ,a~ N
O ~' ~ ~` N
1
~ P
~~
`~ ~~ 7b ~ ~ h h y~J~~
h
'q _ ~~0 ~
~'
I rF o 16 ~ v
O o _
~~ ~ Y ~ - 6 ~ ~~ o~
b ~ ~~
it ~ ' L~1 ~~j ~ ~~ b
o ~~ `' ~
~ ~
--.~~ , W
b - U
o
~~ ~ J g
~ ~ ,~ o~
a
~~~~ .r
~~ ~°`~ ~
1 ~ \ ~, O ~ T
/- ~~ ~ N
r ~ ~ a r, ~ ¢ WW
]"' V J Y ~ ,~` 1 ~b `O L
~r ~
.. ~• ~ I"~
., ~P~ ~ @ \
` z_ 1 ~~ ~r r b
~ 1 `~
~ d ~ ~~bSd '~' G`Z~~~w~~ ~ ~
SPQ- ~ r ~ ~
g ~ - ~ ., a' b~ '~ ~,2~ 1
_ h N
~ ~ \ /~.
s ~ ~d ~ ~ ~Q ~ ~ _
,~ tv b27' 61 ~ '~4 4 ~~,,~' ~N
^~ o ~~ S 'LO ~ ~ ~ ~~ry '^ F'
~ 4 v!
~ ~9 ~ .. ^~ 1~1
N 1~' ~O~" '~ o ~`L. 1~ ~ ~5 ~o ~ J ,q X43 o bQ b w~ 5
"'~ ~ ~~~ ~ ry 1~ \ tr ~O N Q EY ~ WG
b ry ~ ~ ,~~~ \ °~ `° h ~ ~ Z ~ ~ ^~ 'oaf ~ ~,~ (~~ Li
p "~ 'Q' ~ 1 ~ Q 1 ~'6ph ~'~ `r O
h ~ ~ b y9 .r~ ~, 53 IL..RL HOC' V p b~j ~q, ° 0
d o, `
h
~'Oi s~li b 'P1 `~ Q~,~' `ro,' `'~ ~3NWiNJ ry '~'~, ~~ V
Z1 ~~sb V .ai~F 'P ~ ~ ~ .~ `~i
b U ~ ~ ~
LL Q ~OJ b~' ~o~ ~ ~ r it ^ b r J~ . ~ ~
• STAFF REPORT
Project Manager: Jennifer Prochazka Date: August 25, 2004
Email: jprochazka@cstx.gov
Item: Consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for
the Putz-Meyer Place Subdivision, consisting of 2 lots on 14.7 acres, generally
located along the southern side of University Drive, across from the intersection
of University Drive and Tarrow Street East. (04-122)
Applicant: David Scarmardo, agent for property owner Alice Putz
Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat
with the condition that the attached Staff Review Comments are addressed.
Item Summary: This item is for consideration of a Preliminary Plat in
preparation for commercial development of Lot 1, Block 1. The rear of Lot 1
Block 1 will need to be rezoned prior to commercial development on that portion
of the property. Proposed future residential development of Lot 2, Block 1 will
require further platting of the property. The commercial property has frontage
• on University Drive and the residential property will access Lincoln Avenue or
one of the side streets in the Lincoln Addition to the west.
The applicant has shown a proposed private joint access easement with the
adjoining commercial property to the west. This shared drive will align with the
current signalized intersection of University Drive and Tarrow Street East
This plat is in compliance with the Subdivision Regulations.
Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The property is currently zoned C-1
General Commercial and R-1 Single Family Residential. The Land Use Plan
designates the northern portion of this property, and the majority of the
surrounding area, as Retail Regional. The southern portion of the property is
shown for High Density Single Family. University Drive is shown as a Major
Arterial and Lincoln Avenue is shown as a Major Collector on the Thoroughfare
Plan.
Item Background: The property was annexed in 1956 and zoned R-1 Single
Family Residential at that time. According to our historical zoning maps, this
property was rezoned from R-1 to C-1 General Commercial sometime prior to
1972. In 1992, the City initiated rezoning to C-6 Commercial Business and
applied the OV Overlay District along this portion of University Drive. With the
adoption of the UDO in 2003 the C-B district was eliminated and this property
• was rezoned to C-1. This property has never been platted.
• Budgetary & Financial Summary: N/A
Related Advisory Board Recommendations: N/A
Commission Action Options: The Commission has final authority over the
preliminary plat. The options regarding the final plat are:
^ Approve
^ Deny
Supporting Materials:
1. Location Map
2. Aerial
3. Application
4. Infrastructure and Facilities
5. Staff Review Comments No. 2
6. Copy of Preliminary Plat
•
•
• INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES
Water required for plat: Lot 2 has access to a 12-in water main along
Lincoln as well as water along Wellesly and Vassar. Lot 1 must extend
water along University Drive and/ or from Lincoln. A Water Report is
required with development to demonstrate compliance with City design
criteria. Utility extensions shown on the Preliminary Plat only
demonstrates that service is possible.
Water Service: Domestic water and fire service to be provided as
needed for development for each structure.
Sewer required for plat: Each tract has access to the public sanitary
system. A Sewer Report is required to demonstrate compliance with
City design criteria and downstream capacity.
Sewer Service: As development occurs, service is required to each
structure.
Street(s) required for plat: No street is required for the lot layout as
shown.
Streets/Access: Access to Lot 1 is to University Drive at the signalized
intersection. Access to Lot 2 may be feasible from Lincoln, depending
on spacing requirements. Access may be to Wellesley or Vassar.
. Off-site Easements required for plat: None know to be needed at this
time.
Drainage: Drainage of the site is predominately to the drainage structure
under University Drive.
Flood Plain: The area at the entrance to the culvert under University
Drive is FEMA floodplain, Zone A. The developer must submit a report
to establish the Base Flood Elevation (BFE). The BFE shown on the plat
is "proposed". No report has been reviewed.
Oversize request: None at this time.
Parkland Dedication Fees: Lot 2 will be required to meet the City's
Parkland dedication requirements. The Parks Board has not reviewed
this site due to the fact that additional platting will be forth coming before
the area develops.
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2
Project: PUTZ-MEYER PLACE SUBDIVISION (PP) - 04-00500122
ENGINEERING
1. Additional easement may be required for the water line proposed along the
western property line due to separation requirements from existing sewer
lines/ manholes.
2. The design and alignment of the driveway off University Drive will be
approved at the time of site plan. Signalization may be required with
development.
3. The connection to the 18" water line may or may not be required depending
on future development of the R-1 portion of the property and the required fire
flows that will be needed at that time. A connection to the 12-in water line
along University Drive would preclude the need to bore Lincoln Avenue.
4. A study is required to determine the BFE on Lot 1.
5. The sewer line on the west side is an older VCP. The impact of development
over this line must be considered in development plans.
6. Again, utilities shown on the Preliminary Plat are only to show one, feasible
scenario for development. A Final Plat will require construction documents
for water for Lot 1.
Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson & Jennifer Prochazka Date: 8-24-04
•
`~
1
to~ifci vnnun;
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
P8Z CASE NO.:
DATE SUBMITTED:
.~
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION '~ •"~' ~~
The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P & Z Commission
consideration.
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
Filing Fee of $400.00.
Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations ~ $100 (if applicable)
C~ Application completed in full.
-....Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A revised mylar original must be submitted after staff review.)
One (1) copy of the approved Master Plan if applicable.
A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
Rezoning Application if zone change is proposed.
Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of
Date of Preapplication Conference: May 10, 2004
ME OF SUBDIVISION Putz-Meyer Place Subdivision
ECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION 800 University Drive -the SE comer of
Tarrow Street East and University Drive
APPLIC~',NT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project):
Name David Scamtardo -Sahara Realty Group, Ltd.
Street Address P.O. Box 4508 City Bryan
State TX Zip Code 77805 E-Mail Address david cLDscarmardofoods.com
Phone Number 979-779-7209 Fax Number 979-822-1763
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (ALL owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for
multiple owners):
Name Alice Putr
Street Address 815 Lincoln Ave. City Collece Station
State TX Zip Code 77840 E-Mail Address
Phone Number 979-696-6460 Fax Number
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name Klins~ Engineerinc & Surveyinc
• Street Address 4101 S. Texas Ave. Suite A City Brvan
State TX Zip Code 77802
Phone Number 979-846-6212
E-Mail Address: stewart(~klinoeng.com
Fax Number 979-846-8252
6/13/03 1 of 4
Total Acres Of Subdivision 14.74 R-O-W Acr~i~ge Total # Of Lots 2
umber Of Lots By Zoning District / / /
erage Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
7.26 /~ 8.34 /R1 /
Floodplain Acreage 0_7
Parkland dedication by acreage or fee?
A statement addressing any differences between the Preliminary Plat and approved Master Plan (if
applicable) n/a
Requested variances to subdivision regulations & reason for same n/a
Requested oversize participation n/a
Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
E:
# of Acres to be dedicated # of acres in floodplain
# of acres in detention # of acres in greenways
OR
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
# of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 =$
(date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits
attached hereto are true and correct. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of
College Station of the above identified plat and attests that ill respective owners have been identified
on this application.
nature bnd Title Date
6/13/03 2 of 4
r~
~~
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM N0.2.2
Preliminary Plat
Cotten Subdivision
A'
Ika FREE`MAY S~uTH)
•
w
zoo ~ll~ua.am
h .~ ~ ~ N
a ~ O
~0.~ ^ b h H
ti ~ ~Oiy a3ehY ., ^~
a
u ^ ~
`D b ~ b
,'('b~ O 0 ~ h ~
h
a ! -,
o
m
h
Q
4 ~ Q
~"' J --~ a
'~ ~ ~ ° 4
~'~~ W Y ~
W
W d `
N
J
N '
a
m d
U ~
Z
~a
~ J'~ W
~~° a
0 0
~ U
a
V J
N'^
U ~
r
STATE HWY 6
a
q
h ` ~
h ~
~ ~ a
~ ~ ~ ~y1
9C1 a ``` ~° ~ ~~ ~
m Q ~ ti ~~ e r Z
0
3 ~ h ~~~' O
W _ ~ ~ w (_~
Q Q ~ >
b MMQ
"~`
/^
'^
N b ~
~ LZ
. ; . ~"~"~ r
5 rL
~~~
~: 0 ~
E3
h ~•
6-
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3
..' 3 .,
~. mY ~ ~
5
e
~
X
w
Y p
a
J ~
~
P o ~W
,y
y17 ~
°S
PA
~~+ =
O
3
Q
N `
C /
p
W
~
d ~
/
O ~ yJr9 ~ O vJ
~ Z
~UW
U Z
~O
A ``
N pa
~
~m
oa
~Q m
V O Q
=~N J
pW
U
~ ~
NN Q
~~
o a U~
W _
oa
~~ a
~,
U
MEMORANDUM
August 24, 2004
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Spencer Thompson
Email: shompson@cstx.gov
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT for GOTTEN SUBDIVISION
Item: Consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for the
Cotten Subdivision consisting of 8 lots on 26 acres generally located at 2400 Harvey
Mitchell Parkway South. (04-185)
Applicant: Veronica Morgan, Agent for Owners as shown on Plat
Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat as
• submitted.
Item Summary: This item is for consideration of a Preliminary Plat for Cotten
Subdivision. The plat includes the property in the recent Cotten Rezoning, Lots 1 and 2
of Block 1. Lot 3 of Block 1 is under current consideration for P-MUD rezoning.
The surrounding tracts are currently zoned R-1 Single Family Residential. The R-1
zoning affects the properties shown on the plat in several ways. Residential lots are not
permitted by ordinance to take access to arterial streets. Therefore, a note appears on
the plat to this regard. A street is required for these lots to take access to an arterial. In
addition, two properties are shown as "Reserve" due to insufficient buildable area.
The plat aligns the southern extension of Dartmouth with the roadway extension from
Harvey Mitchell Pkwy through to Krenek Tap Lane. The Applicant has provided a
separate drawing showing how the two streets are to be aligned. Utilities shown on the
plans demonstrate one feasible alternative. Required Sewer and Water Reports will
determine actual line sizes, locations and easements.
The properties shown on this plat are adjacent to the City Center Project. The City
Center Committee is currently looking at adopting design standards for the Center.
Additional design standards are being considered for the Overlay along Harvey Mitchell.
• Comprehensive Plan Considerations:
Land Use Plan: The LUP shows Planned Development, Office and Floodplain.
• Thoroughfare Plan: Harvey Mitchell Parkway is a major arterial, Dartmouth is a minor
arterial. Dartmouth is to be constructed with the Final Plat of the lots shown on the
Preliminary Plat.
Parkland Dedication: Residential development is required to comply with the Parkland
Dedication Ordinance at Final Plat. Some of the tracts currently zoned for residential
development are being considered for rezoning by the owners.
Open Space Dedication: None at this time. Consideration has been given to
Greenways dedication.
Special Area Plans: The area north of Harvey Mitchell Pkwy is in the City Center. The
area south of Harvey Mitchell Pkwy is in the gateway to the City Center.
Budgetary & Financial Summary: Oversize Participation is expected to be requested
for construction of Dartmouth and some utilities as allowed per Section 9 of the
Subdivision Regulations.
Attachments:
1. Area map
2. Application
3. Aerial
4. Copy of Plat
•
` ,~ ~ V
`~ '
FOR OFFIC„Er~E NLY
P&Z CASE NO.: ~/ 'i r ~ gs
DATE SUBMITTED: / ~~ `O
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION
The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P & Z Commission
consideration.
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
X Filing Fee of $400.00.
N/A Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations ~ $100 (if applicable)
X Application completed in full.
X Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A revised mylar original must be submitted after staff review.)
N/A One (1) copy of the approved Master Plan if applicable.
X A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
N/A Rezoning Application if zone change is proposed.
N/A Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of
approval (if applicable).
to of Preapplication Conference:
E OF SUBDIVISION Cotton Subdivision
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION approximately 600 feet west of the intersection of
SH6 Bypass and FM 2818
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project):
Name Veronica J.B. Moraan. P.E.- Mitchell & Morgan LLP
Street Address 511 University Dr. E.. Ste. 204 City College Station
State TX Zip Code 77840 E-Mail Address vCa~mitchellandmorgan.com
Phone Number (979) 260-6963 Fax Number (979) 260-3564
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (ALL owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for
multiple owners):
Name Baptist Church Loan Corp c/o Kenneth Cotten
Street Address 5541 Bear Lane. Ste. 111 City Corpus Christi
State TX Zip Code 78405 E-Mail Address
Phone Number (361) 289-5168
Fax Number (361) 289-5442
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
Name Veronica J.B. Morgan P.E. - ManaglnQ Partner
Street Address 511 University Dr. E.. Ste. 204 City College Station
State TX Zip Code 77840 E-Mail Address vt'r~mitchellandmorgan.com
Phone Number (979) 260-6963 Fax Number (979) 260-3564
6/13/03
1 of4
Total Acres Of Subdivision 25.79 ac R-O-W Acreage 2.26 ac Total # Of Lots 8
ber Of Lots By Zoning District 2 / C-1w/OV 1 / R-D 5 / R-1
erage Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
3.5 ac / R-1 / / /
Floodplain Acreage 4.1 ac
Parkland dedication by acreage or fee? N/A
A statement addressing any differences between the Preliminary Plat and approved Master Plan (if applicable)
None
Requested variances to subdivision regulations & reason for same None
Requested oversize participation Oversize narticigation will be requested on Dartmouth and the 12" waterline
within the Dartmouth right-of-wav
~Icland Dedica ' n due prior to filing the Final Plat:
ACREAGE:
# of Acres to be ~dicated # of acres in floodplain
# of acres in detentiol9 ~ _
OR ~~
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
# of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $ _ $
(date) Approved by Parks & Rec a
# of acres in greenways
Board
The applicant has, prepared. this. application and..ce~es. that the facts stated herein and exhibits-'°
attached hereto are true and correct. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of
Coll Station of the above identified plat and attests that all respective owners have been identified
on t ~s application.
~,~~ r - ~
.~
gnature and Ti Date
6/13/03 2 of4
•
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM N0.2.3
Preliminary Plat
Horse Haven Estates Phase II
Z F-
w ~ J
• _, a
,~` ~\~ ~
G~
w c~
,~ w
M
Q1
r
O
N
~ f~
U
N
2
a
w
Q
• _ ~
w
d z
w
Q
o w
m ~
a O
N o
w ~
F, a
a
N
W Z
z O
z =
2 ~ W ~
w ~FP~ J
J~
_ F3Ei~~ O
N ~ ~
~ N
2 ~ Y
2 ~ ~ w
~ v ~ w C W
w ~
a ~
U ~.:r L
O F ~ r
++
~ o' (n Z
a N a N ~ W
U ~
~ x N ~
d' LL' J W O
~ ~ ~ ~ U J
Z a ~ O ~
a ~ ~ y W
~ U O ~~
a U
h
z ~"Q o
~1\
~~!/
• STAFF REPORT
Project Manager: Jennifer Prochazka Date: August 24, 2004
Email: jprochazka@cstx.gov
Item: Consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for
Horse Haven Estates Phase II, consisting of 58 lots on 16.44 acres, generally
located on the east side of Earl Rudder Freeway, south of State Highway 30.
Applicant: Alton E. Ofczarzak, agent for Virginia Hermann, property owner.
Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat
with the condition that the attached Staff Review Comments are addressed.
Item Summary: This item is for consideration of a Preliminary Plat in preparation
for residential development. The applicant is proposing 58 R-1 Single Family
Residential lots and several reserve tracts.
Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan designates the
majority of this property as Single-Family Residential Medium Density and
• Floodplain /Streams. The 100-year floodplain is shown as proposed greenway
on the Preliminary Plat.
Appomattox is shown as a minor collector on the Thoroughfare Plan. The
applicant has provided sufficient right-of-way for the extension of Appomattox to
the northern property. While discussions of whether Appomattox should stay on
the plan as a minor collector are on-going, this plat is meeting the current
Thoroughfare Plan.
The Preliminary plat is in compliance with the approved Master Plan and the
Subdivision Regulations.
Item Background: The property was annexed in 1977 and zoned A-O at that
time. The property was rezoned to R-1 Single Family Residential earlier this
year. A Master Plan of this property and the surrounding area was also
approved earlier this year.
Budgetary & Financial Summary: N/A
Related Advisory Board Recommendations: The Parks Board recommended
fee in lieu of land dedication with the condition that a pedestrian access way is
provided for the residents of Horse Haven Estates to access Windwood Park.
This will either be accomplished by way of pedestrian walk way at the end of
. Horse Shoe Drive in Phase III of the development or with the extension of
Appomattox.
• Commission Action O tions: The Commission has final authori over the
P tY
Preliminary Plat. The options are:
^ Approval
^ Denial
Supporting Materials:
1. Location Map
2. Aerial
3. Application
4. Staff Review Comments No. 2
5. Infrastructure and Facilities
6. Copy of Preliminary Plat
u
•
• INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES
Water required for development: There is an existing 8-in water line
along Horse Haven Lane. This line is to be extended to provide fire
coverage and domestic uses.
Water Service: Water service to be provided to each lot and proposed
structure.
Sewer required for development: There are two existing sewer mains
within the property boundaries. Sanitary sewer system is to be extended
as shown on plat.
Sewer Service: Sewer service to be extended to each lot.
Street/Access required for development: Access is to be provided to
each lot. Appomattox is required per the T-fare Plan.
Off-site Easements required for development: None known to be
needed at this time. Numerous abandonments to occur for Final Plat.
Drainage: Drainage is generally to Wolf Pen Creek. Some to Carters
Creek.
• Flood Plain: Wolf Pen Creek and Carters Creek floodplains are on the
subject site, as shown. No lots are proposed in the floodplain.
Oversize request: None requested at this time.
Impact Fees: None
Parkland Dedication Fees: The Parks Board recommended fee in lieu
of land dedication with the condition that a pedestrian access way be
provided for the residents of Horse Haven Estates to access Windwood
Park. This will either be accomplished by way of pedestrian walk way at
the end of Horse Shoe Drive in Phase III of the development or with the
extension of Appomattox.
•
•
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS NO. 2
Project: HORSE HAVEN ESTATES PH 2 (PP) - 04-00500193
ENGINEERING
1. A temporary turnaround is required at the end of Horse Shoe Drive. Please
show on the Preliminary Plat.
2. The 6" proposed sewer line along Horse Shoe Drive must end in a manhole,
per TCEQ requirements. Please show on the Preliminary Plat.
3. Please be aware that the abandonment process must be underway before
Final Plat.
4. A water report is required to show that water is designed per City regulations.
Line sizes shown on plat are preliminary.
5. A sewer report is required with the Final Plat submittal. Line sizes and
capacities are determined at that time.
6. It appears that a drainage easement may be necessary for the storm sewer
outfall to Wolf Pen Creek.
• Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson & Jennifer Prochazka Date:8-24-04
•
~` ~ ~~ FOR OFFICE USE ~ L~Y
P8Z CASE NO.: D
DATE SUBMITTED: g'~ ~~~
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION
The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P & Z Commission
consideration.
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
Filing Fee of $400.00.
Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations ~ $100 (if applicable)
Application completed in full.
Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A revised mylar original must be submitted after staff review.)
One (1) copy of the approved Master Plan if applicable.
A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
Rezoning Application if zone change is proposed.
Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of
Date of Preapplication Conference: FEBRUARY 18.2004 ~ (,-~~-'~~-,
~E OF SUBDIVISION HORSE HAVEN ESTATES PHASE TWO ~ ~+
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION EARL RUDDER FREEWAY BEHIND ACADEMY
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project):
Name ALTON E. OFCZARZAK. GENERAL MANAGER. OAKWOOD CUSTOM HOME GROUP. INC.
Street Address P.O. BOX 9849 City COLLEGE STATION
State TEXAS Zip Code 77842 E-Mail Address alton _oakchb.com
Phone Number 979-690-1504Fax Number 979-690 2504
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (ALL owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for
multiple owners):
Name BURT HERMANN
Street Address 2701 HORSE HAVEN LANECity COLLEGE STATION
State TEXAS Zip Code 77845 E-Mail Address
Phone Number 979-693-9513 Fax Number
ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
• Name I~IIICHAEL G. RESTER. P.E.. NESTER ENGINEERING COMPANY
Street Address 7607 EASTMARK, DRIVE. SUITE 253-8 City COLLEGE STATION
State TX Zip Code 77840
E-Mail Address mhester ,~hester-engr.com
Phone Number 979-693-1100 Fax Number 979-693-1075
Total Acres Of Subdivision 13.88 R-O-W Acreage 1.85
ber Of Lots By Zoning District 58 /R=1
rage Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
Floodplain Acreage 0
Parkland dedication by acreage or fee? FEE
/_
Total # Of Lots
/_
A statement addressing any differences between the Preliminary Plat and approved Master Plan (if
applicable) NA
Requested variances to subdivision regulations & reason for same NA
Requested oversize participation OVERSIZED STORM SEWER TO ACCOMMODATE UPSTREAM
PROPERTY
land Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
A REAGE:
# of Acres to be dedicated
# of acres in detention
# of acres in floodplain
# of acres in greenways
OR
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
58 # of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $ 32.248
8-10-4 (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board
The applicant has preps d is application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits
attached hereto are true an correct. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of
College Station of the ab ve dented plat and attests that all respective owners have been ident~ed
on this avnlica#~on.
`~ ~- (9~
Date
•
•
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM N0.2.4
Final Plat
The Gardens
n
`~
.~'
,.
-_
:_
`.. ,; ;~
~+ i~; `i~ ---
~ ^ ~J,~
/,~ ~ %/
,~~~' /~ ~ ~~ C7 ~ ~. r.,( ` In
.\ ^r
,.~ ,Y
i
i ~ ~ '
\ , `, r,
~~
.: _
~,
i -~---r_._~ ~ -- -\ 1 _
I ___~ - _
i ~ ' ~ . 1 ~ _--.
FM 2154 -~'(~ ~ ~~ i'
--------
__-.... ~ I --
`.
~ ..J i_ ~ ~~ `~. , ,.
~ -- --- ~ / ; ~ \\~y~ ~ it i~ / ,
~ - / ~
- ? ~ / , ,/
.., ._. ~.
_-.
1
~~
-.,
. ~ , ,._
,_.,
f ~ (NC
._,..~, /
~'
~ , .~ ,- 1 ~ ,%~~~'~ ~ ~ w
~ -:\ ~ Z
,A ~ ;- ~
\~ ~ \ ~ ~/ ~
,,
t ( -~~ = `~ ~, , ~ ,% W
_U
., y .:
~~-'" - ~ ~-__~ ~i
~ ''' -'
MEMORANDUM
August 24, 2004
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Spencer Thompson
Email: shompson@cstx.gov
SUBJECT: FINAL PLAT for THE GARDENS (ETJ)
Item: Consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for the The
Gardens consisting of 2 lots on 7 acres generally located on Wellborn Road near
McCullough Road, south of Barron Road Cut-off in the City's ETJ. (04-00500104)
Applicant: Alton Ofczarzak, Owner
Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat, as submitted.
•
Item Summary: This item is for consideration of a Final Plat for The Gardens. The 2
lots front on Wellborn Road (FM 2154). The City, the County, and TxDOT all requested
the joint access easement in order to meet the required driveway spacing along
Wellborn Road. Wellborn Road is TxDOT ROW.
This item was submitted prior to the ordinance requiring fire flows in the City's ETJ and
is not being considered under that provision.
Comprehensive Plan Considerations:
Land Use Plan: Shown as rural. However, being in the ETJ there is no regulation
governing development in regard to commercial, residential, density, etc.
Thoroughfare Plan: Wellborn Road is a major arterial.
Parkland Dedication: None in ETJ.
Attachments:
1. Area map
2. Application
3. Aerial
4. Copy of Plat on wall of Council Chambers
•
FOR OFFICE USE O L~
P&Z Case No.: ~-~-~-~-Q,
Date Submitted: 'v -
,,., ~-..
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION ~ ETJ
The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for Planning 8 Zoning Commission
consideration.
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
~ Final plat review and filing fee $400 NOTE: Multiple Sheets - $55 per additional sheet
Q~Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review prior to the
Manning & Zoning Commission.)
L.J~ One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and/or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable).
C~Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D.
OVA copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
^ Three (3) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable).
NAME OF SUBDIVISION ~~~~ C,~~,dBiV S
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot & Block) /C~~CocvS,C f~ ~S~%y1 ~~~.r;/~~P~
~LICANT/PROJECT M
ANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project):
Name /Y~ ~` AA
~'S ~~ G, ~ E-Mail
Street Address
City State Zip Code
Phone Number Fax Number
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name ~lCr,~ Q~'C'z~4 ~zs-,~ fi~'J1~i?. &, J b,~~__ I'~~~ E-Mail
Street Address °t~p ~ es-~~ ~' asC,du~~AE~Cl
City l,L~iL% S7il T o,~ State ~ , Zip Code ~ 78 f~S~
Phone NumberCq'7q) G 90 ~ /->~0 ~ Fax Number
R ENGINEE 'S INFORMATION:
Name 2 v~ ~' E-Mail ~ .~ ~, ~,. , ~~ h,,
Street Address / 72 2 /~A/.~ ~~R ~`, iT~ ~~ .Y'-
City State r~C Zip Code ~7 ~0 Z
Phone Number [Gj' ~ ~ ~ 776 ~ ~ ~3 6 Fax Number ~9 79) ~3 /-~~ ~l 6
r~
U
1-Aug-02 1 of 4
Acreage Total Property ~ ~ ~(, _
sting Use:
tuber Of Lots By Zoning District _
Proposed Use:
Average Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
R-O-W Acreage
D
Floodplain Acreage y
A Statement Addressing Any Differences Between The Final Plat And Approved Master Development Plan
And/Or Preliminary Plat (If Applicable):
Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations & Reason For Same: .~1f,4
Requested Oversize Participation: _~
•
Total Linear Footage of
Proposed Public:
St
t l
~/
ree
s .
Sidewalks
Sanitary Sewer Lines
Water Lines
Channels
Storm Sewers
Bike Lanes /Paths
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached
hereto are true, correct and ~;c~pl~te. The undersigned hereby requests approval by fhe City of College
Station of the above-identified ~~~nal ~~at.
b
Date
Total # Of Lots
1-Aug-02 2 of 4
•
n
u
AGENDA ITEM N0.3
Absence Requests
•
City of College Station
Absence Request Form
For Elected and Appointed Officers
C~
Name Marilyn Hooton
Request Submitted on Date: August 18, 2004
I will not be in attendance at the
meeting of
for the reason(s) specified:
September 2, 2004
(Date)
Out of town. Family emergency.
See a-mail on back.
Signature
This request shall be submitted to the office of the City Secretary or Board
Secretary otte week prior to meeting dates
•
City of College Station
Absence Request Form
For Elected and Appointed Ufficers
Name Ben White
Request Submitted on Date: August 23, 2004
I will not be in attendance at the
meeting of
for the reasons} specified:
• state.
but of
September 2, 2004
^ (Date)
See a-mail on back.
Signature
This request shall be submitted to the of,~ce of the City Secretary or Board
Secretary one weeiC prior to meeu'ng dates
From: <Mjhooton(~aol.com>
To: ; <Shazlett(~cstx.gov>
Datek 8/18/2004 8:30:02 AM
Subj'~'iect: Absence
Susan,
Al~y reason for being absent on Sept 2 has
but 1`ny mother is now going to have surgery
Texas cartng for her,
Thank you,
Hlave a blessed day.
Marilyn Hooton
changed. Not Aggie Football
that week so I will be in Athens,
•
•
Susan Hazlett - _ _ _ _ . Page 1 ;;
From: Ben White <bwhite~mail.st joseph.org>
To: "'shazlett(tDcstx.gov"' <shazlett(l~cstx.goV>
Date: 8/22/2004 4:57:24 PM
Hi Susan........
Forget the tell you this past Thurday that I would be out of sti~te on
Thursday Sept 2 and will miss the P8Z meeting. Also, I wanted to thank you
for your good work at our last meeting.
Ben
Ben White, CAE
Executive Director
Brazos Valley Parkinson Association
1600 Joseph Drive
Bryan, TX 77802
979.821.7523
979.821.7585 (F)
•
AGENDA ITEM NO.S
Master Plan
Dove Crossing
• STAFF REPORT
Project Manager: Jennifer Prochazka Date: August 25, 2004
Email: jprochazka@cstx.gov
Item: Consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Master Plan for Dove
Crossing, consisting of 97.94 acres, generally located along the south side of
Graham Road, across from the intersection of Graham Road and Schaffer Road.
(04-189)
Applicant: Strong Surveying, agent for Anthony Jones, property owner
Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Master Plan as
submitted.
Item Summary: This item is for consideration of a Master Plan for an R-1 Single
Family Residential development of just under 100 acres. This development will
include the construction of two minor collectors. Pedestrian access ways to the
school property to the west will be provided with the platting of the property.
The applicant has proposed detention for this development on the adjacent
• property to the south, which is not yet platted. Depending on what is proposed at
the time of development of the detention pond area, this property may need to
be platted.
Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The proposed Master Plan is in
compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. The Land Use Plan shows the
subject property and surrounding area as Single Family Medium Density.
Alexandria Avenue and Eagle Avenue are shown as minor collectors, and
Graham Road is shown as a major collector on the Thoroughfare Plan.
Item Background: The subject property was annexed into the City in 1993 and
zoned A-O Agricultural Open at that time. The property was rezoned to R-1
Single Family Residential earlier this year.
Budgetary & Financial Summary: N/A
Related Advisory Board Recommendations: The Parks Board recommended
fee in lieu of land dedication.
Commission Action Options: The Commission has final authority over the
Master Plan. The options are:
^ Approval
• Denial
Supporting Materials:
• 1. Location Map
2. Aerial
3. Application
4. Infrastructure and Facilities
5. Copy of Master Plan
•
•
• INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES
Water: There is an existing 12" water main on the south side of Graham, a 12"
main along Alexandria, and a 12" main along Eagle Avenue.
,~
Sewer: There is an existing 18 sewer main on the south property line. The
northwest portion of the subject property is in the 92-01 Sewer Impact fee Area.
Streets: The Thoroughfare Plan shows a minor collector street from the
southwest corner of the tract connecting to Alexandria, then connecting to Eagle
Avenue, then traversing the property to Graham Road toward the north.
Off-site Easements: The proposed off-site drainage will require an easement
from the property owner.
Drainage: Drainage is to Lick Creek. According to the Drainage Ordinance, this
development is not allowed to increase the 100-year flood level, either upstream
or downstream.
Flood Plain: No floodplain appears on the subject property.
Oversize request: Oversize participation may be requested on infrastructure at
the platting stage. This issue will be reviewed based on what the development
requires to develop and what is being constructed.
• Impact Fees: The 2000 Update to the 92-01 Impact Fee Area shows a strip of
land along Graham Road on the subject property, approximately 170'x1400', m
the impact fee area. The current fee is $232.04 per L~vmg Unit Equivalent.
Parkland Dedication: The Parks Board recommended fee in lieu of land
dedication.
•
.,,r w
FOR O FICE UISE LY
P8Z CASE NO.: `'
DATE SUBMITTED: -tV
MASTER PLAN APPLICATION I Z~4-~P'~
The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P & Z Commission
consideration.
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
J Filing Fee of $400.00.
/ Application completed in full.
/ Thirteen (13) folded copies of plan. (A revised mylar original must be submitted after staff review.)
A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
~~ Rezoning Application if zone change is proposed.
Date of Required Preapplication Conference:
NAME OF SUBDIVISION ~Dv~ CRoSS I1~ G
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION q~p•~`f ~ ~eS a
~~ Grah~lm ~a~ ~.r~~ ~G~-,a~r 't~r~ac~
~LICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project):
Name ~TRnNG SuRVEYIrJ ~
Street Address ~r122 6K~AD MOOR , Sy rTE ~ O S
City 8 R ~(/~ ~ State '~?~ Zip Code ~ ~ $O 2
E-Mail Address Cur''~'~S('c~S"1"1'or-ASy~'~e,~l i no- .Corn
Phone Number ~rl (o ' q~3 CQ Fax Number r13 l ' 00 ~(~
PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
Name ~'I~~ - 'ffl ~I ~~,[ ~~ST nn ENTS , LL P ~~N~t+ont K L . ~o N ES
StreetnAddress ~j 2 O ~i E2r~ ~ u~ ~ C/ ~o uTt~-l
City ~v~(P ~ `j-~~-~~o ~ State ~T"k Zip Code ~~Sy'~
E-Mail Address a qq roup~ -~-xCNb-er, Co m
Phone Number Cfl`1 S -
Fax Number fobs - Z~ ~"
•
r~ ~
TOTAL ACREAGE OF SUBDIVISION:
TOTAL ACREAGE BY ZONING DISTRICT:
TOTAL FLOODPLAIN ACREAGE
NONE
WILL PARKLAND DEDICATION BE MET BY ACREAGE OR EE ? (CIRCLE ONE)
(if acreage, please show approximate size and location on plan)
REQUESTED VARIANCES TO SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS & REASON FOR SAME
NorJE
REQUESTED OVERSIZE PARTICIPATION ~ oN ~
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached
hereto are true and correct. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Station of the
above-identified plan.
~/c~ ~o~
Signature and T' Date
u
•
AGENDA ITEM N0.6
• Variance Request & Replat
Richards Subdivision Lot 11
•
`
° r 40
-
o
slj~ J r
~/fz
c~ft 2
~~GP 2404 24 ~)~6 t~~
~
o~~,
~ rrr ' 2402
^, `~ ~.. a. 1J ~
/
g o d ~p 2 e ~ t ~ ~r
~~ Q H
\~
\~ ~
b
d.O
\5P O ~2
' ~ 9~ ~' ~ C ` ry
~p~ 4~ ~ ~'
t
r ^
o
^'
J
h Z
oe,
b b ~
~y s ~ ~ O
b~ ~
~ ~ P
~
h
`~' e ~
40 24~~
h ~ O
`O ~ bs ~ ~
~ 2
~ " ti ~ ~ `~ X51 h
'~
~i~ ~ r
° ~,9
"
6 ~
O
o ,`
~
~'` ~Lj p. ~s
~
~ ~ Fp,~
v ~2
2}5
1~ 1j51 c ~,~
d~
`~' `~ ~
\ o GQ" ~
L
ti
~° .
,
N ip T ~
~ ". ^ b
x.,1,6 ^
7 ~ c' ~ `$~+
h
h
~
~P
5ti
y1 ~
^ ~ ~~ %.
~
h ~~~
~ ~
r
h
nn
h\V !
~0 p
/~ /~ ~ a 6jr
S pP ~. ~ ~ h
p
~y h ~
a~0 5 /
/~ ~ a, /r ~
z
Q yJ~~ o ~ ~ •
~
a~PaO~ ~r~r ,~, ~~y, ~ lct,~ ` ~, q
U
g ~ W
"~ ~ U ~~ m Q ~~t ~ a
m .~~ % 'g.
~ 1
J 1
N h
_I ~
_ p ~
rah ^
~r /~
N r h i~r
!
' art ~
y,
'Y`
~ +
1 R
1'
~ ~ ~ n') ~ !~ ~~
~
~ ~ r..
O
t
~ ~
~ .~ ~
t
J
~ ~ ~
~ r
b ~ ~ O
h Q v
~~~ ~ sp ~
O] m ~~/
~+- '^
V /
~
\~ ~ ry ~~
~
~
!/ MM
~~
~
p~ ~ o
Qo
t Q
~ ~ ~ h <
m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
i
Q
~t ~
ii i '~
i a
~ r~~ ~S p~ a ~! h /
y/
LL
~ ~ 9,~ ~1i s ~~i aS
t ^ . y ~o
.- i ~t
1 h lp, psi O dpi ~O ry \
~~
~o~
' ^ ~/ ~ /
a r ~
°~
Z ~
~
~ b
V
O W lp ~
~~ ~
~ p~ ~ ~ rpm h \
\
`per dp
o Q i
~
~ ~p~ bly v `v'
l
ap
~
p
~ t ^'~ ^
~~
~y
~r
~ ~ N
~
^
!p A
` 2
L /
Q er ,Sp
i 1- W
! fie ,
a ~
' [ >
~~ `
W v ~
Q
J ~
~h
h ~`~~ Q
~
~
\
P
~ ~ ~
r+n+L
~
o~, ti F
~ ~ Q ~ ~
~ \~
\~\
~\~
~ v/
~J
v
W
s \ O ~ \ V ~
~~
~bti P~ o W
U~
zoo ~ o au<
+m "~ .
~ ~ ~
O .,
MEMORANDUM
August 24, 2004
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Spencer Thompson
Email: sthompson@cstx.gov
SUBJECT: VARIANCE REQUEST AND REPEAT for RICHARDS SUBDIVISION
LOT 11
Item: Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a Variance Request to Section
18 of the Subdivision Regulations and a Replat for Richards Subdivision Lot 11
consisting of 2 lots on 0.25 acres generally located at 201 Richards Street. (04-
00500177)
Applicant: Kerr Surveying, Agent for Owner
•
Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the request for a variance
and Replat.
Item Summary: This item is for consideration of a variance request to Section 18 of
the Subdivision Regulations regarding Platting and Replatting in Older Residential
Subdivisions. The ordinance requires that when a replat is submitted for a lot where the
original subdivision was created before 7/15/70 and the replat creates a new lot, all lots
shown on the plat must meet two criteria:
^ All lots on the plat must meet or exceed the average width of the lots in the block,
and
^ All lots on the plat must contain a minimum 8,500 sgft.
The original plat for Richards Subdivision created all lots approximately 104-ft by 104-ft.
The minimum lot allowed in R-1 is 50-ft by 100-ft. Numerous properties in the area
have been resubdivided over the years to 52-ft wide. According to the Applicant, the
current average width of the lots in the block is 74-ft. The resulting lots from this replat
would be approximately 52-ft wide containing 5,458 sgft. Therefore, the variance
request is for both provisions contained in the ordinance, lot width and lot area.
• Lot 10 was resubdivided in March 2002 with a variance to Section 18. Lots 8 and 9
were resubdivided in March 2003 with a variance, as well. Lots 34, 35 and 36 were
resubdivided in October 1976 prior to Section 18.
• Please note re uirements of Section 5 re ardin findin sin con '
q g g g sideration of a variance
request. Section 5 provided below.
The Comprehensive Plan shows this area as single-family, residential- high density (7-9
dwelling units per acre). The variance is in compliance with the Land Use Plan.
Comprehensive Plan Considerations:
Land Use Plan: Shows the Richards subdivision as single-family residential, high
density.
Thoroughfare Plan: None in the immediate area.
Parkland Dedication: Parkland Dedication Fee and Development Fee are due on
newly created lot.
Attachments:
1. Area map
2. Application
3. Aerial
4. Average lot width calculation letter and exhibit.
5. Copy of Plat on wall of Council Chambers.
•
• SECTION 5: VARIANCES
5-A The Commission may authorize a variance from the regulation when, in
their opinion, undue hardship will result from requiring strict compliance. In
granting a variance, the Commission shall prescribe only conditions that it deems
not prejudicial to the public interest. In making the findings hereinbefore
required, the Commission shall take into account the nature of the proposed use
of the land involved, the existing use of land in the vicinity, the number of per-
sons who will reside or work in the proposed subdivision, the possibility that a
nuisance will be created, and the probable effect of such variance upon traffic
conditions and upon public health, convenience, and welfare of the vicinity. No
variance shall be granted unless the Commission finds:
5-A.1 That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the
land involved such that strict application of the provisions of this chapter
will deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land;
5-A.2 That the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment
of a substantial property right of the applicant;
5-A.3 That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area,
• or to the City in administering this chapter; and
5-A.4 That the granting of the variance will not have the effect of pre-
venting the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with
the provisions of this chapter.
5-B Such findings of the Commission, together with the specific facts upon
which such findings are based, shall be incorporated into the official minutes of
the meetings at which such variance is granted. Variances may be granted only
when in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this chapter so that
public Health, safety, and welfare may be secured and substantial justice done.
•
a+-i~~
I'~pm
b~~o~a~ (~'iR
• KERB SURVEYING, LLC
P.O. BOX 269
505 CHURCH STREET
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77841
Brad Kerr
Registered Professional
Land Surveys #4502
Telephone:
(979)268-3195
(979) 691-8904 FAX
August 6, 2004
City of College Station
Site Review Committee
RE: Request for Variance on Proposed Replat of Lot 11, Richards Subdivisioq College Station,
Brazos County, Texas, to create 2 lots 52.2' X 104.6' from 1 existing 104.4' X 104.6' lot.
As shown on the attached exhibit, half of the original lots within this "block" (from Texas Avenue
to Lassie Lane) have been divided in half by original deeds or by Replats. The adjacent lots to the
• south (lots 8-10) have been replatted to 52.2' lots within the past 3 years. Of the 36 existing
parcels, 24 are currently at 52.2' wide. The average "lot width" within this block is 74 feet. All
surrounding lots have already been divided and developed leaving no additional land area to
create new lots to meet the "average" width according to Section 18 of the Subdivision
Regulations. A replat of Lot 11 will create 2 new lots that will match the configuration of the
existing lots on either side and across the street.
A variance is requested in order to enhance the continuing development and revitalization of this
neighborhood.
~~~~~ro~.c~
Louise Fischer
CAD Manager
•
~ '1e
-'~ ~~
`yP
USSIE LN USSIE LN
1 ,,
,~
x
r .,'h~ r
n „
,~ N
n {V „yP
~
SUBJECT N ~~
n
PROPERLY
, a
, N ~ ~
In ~
i
•~
U
K V Q
~ '^
N
y~j ,y^P
,a
tV
00 O ~ TO
~ Z 3~
y
m N
~, lV
~' eye
n
eP ~ y~'
as
0
}.
m
*
~ '~'P
2S
n BY'DEED
CURRENT "AVERAGE" LOT
WIDTH FROM TEXAS AVE. TO
LASSIE LANE (FOR "BLOCK")
74 FEET
36 TOTAL PARCELS:
24 A 52.2' (BY DEED OR PLAT)
12 OVER 52' WIDE
a
7M1
-~ o_
O
w
~ - 52 ° 3
bj ~
n ~ o
o
~
` s
~
.S ~ {
~ 4
.~O
O
r
~ ti
ti ~ ~ M19
~ I I I I '10
9
0
6
h
1
TEXAS AV S
EXHIBIT FOR VARIANCE REQUEST -REPEAT OF LOT 11, RICHARDS SUBDIVISION
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
P&Z Case No.: ~ ' ~ ~~
Date Submitted: C.~' ~ ~ ~ 1 (`(`~
1 " -
~ ~~- I_ .'
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
(Check one) ^ Amending ^ Final ^ Vacating ['Replat
($300.00) ($400.00) ($400.00) *Includes pu b01ic00h)earing fee
The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P8~Z Commission
consideration.
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
[]'Final plat review and filing fee (see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets ~ $55.00 per additional sheet
^ Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations ~ $100 (if applicable)
^ Development permit fee ~of $200.00 (if applicable).
^ Infrastructure inspection fee of $600.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed)
[All replats must be accompanied with a copy of the deed restrictions/covenants for this plat. .
[.~]' Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.)
^ One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and/or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable).
Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D.
A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not.
Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable).
^ Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of
approval (if applicable).
NAME OF SUBDIVISION
SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot & Block)
APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project):
Name ~,~~_,~~~''~~ ~ E-Mail ~ Use • -~S~~ier~l/~Yi ZO/7. /~e7L
Street Address
City~~ ~~ State ~ Zip Code U _
Phone Number _~,d~ ~~9.5 Fax Number ~~/- ~
CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: (All owners must be identified. Please attach an
additional sheet, if necessary)
Name
E-Mail
Street Address
City ~,~1 State `~ Zip Code ''I 'I~Da
Phone Number ~~L-~Z7/ Fax Number ~~~ -~7~~
CHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION:
~ame
Street Address
City
Phone Number
E-Mail
State
Fax Number
Zip Code
1 of 5
Acreage Total Property Total # Of Lots _~ R-O-W Acreage
ing Use: r~yL1~~ `a~ _ Proposed Use: /~P5%Gi°%T~9Ct-~
Number Of Lots By Zoning District o? I 1 1
Average.Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District:
~s~I I I l
Floodplain Acreage /~, ,~1
A Statement Addressing Any Differences Between The Final Plat And Approved Master Development Plan
And/Or Preliminary Plat (If Applicable):
Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations & Reason For Same: ~~YI~Q/7C+e ~ 10f L.Wi~~ ~Se~. ~~1
Requested Oversize Participation: C~ ~~d ~~~~~
Total Linear Footage of
Proposed Public:
Streets
Sidewalks
Sanitary Sewer Lines
Water Lines
_ Channels
Storm Sewers
Bike Lanes /Paths
Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat:
ACREAGE:.
# of acres to be dedicated + $ development fee
# of acres in floodplain
# of acres in detention
# of acres in greenways
OR
FEE IN LIEU OF LAND:
# of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $
# of Multi-Family Dwelling Units X $452 = $
(date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board
NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING.
The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached
hereto are true, correct and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College
Station of the above-identified final plat and attests that this request does not amend any covenants or
~triction associated with this plat.
Signature and Title ~J_ Date
2of5
•
AGENDA ITEM No. 7
Rezoning
Pebble Creek
•
C R
~
R\ R
R
R
R , R'
R R ` ~
e R
~ S R R
t R
R
q
`i
R
R
~ R R q ~
R y q ` W
R R i W
;
~ R I R ~ I
R
R R R
.
R R R
q
q -
` R
_
>
M
I
R
' q
i •
•
' R
_ VIf J
'
q t
•
• ,
` d q R i R R
R•
~ R
^ R R i _
^ ~
i~, I W
q
~ • ' R
q R`
A
R
I~
8 q
q • R R
• q R R
• n
Y R i R
S ; i
R ~ R
i
•• R
n
R i
• ^
~ •
S i R R
i\ IR iR R
^~ R i
R R •
R R
i i f R °
~f
_
~ 1 R
::
i
i i
/ t
~ •
` ! i ,
Y
R
RR
R R ^ ~
~• R ~•
R
^ R
B ! !
! ! R•
i• _ Ri • p a
o
° R
i R ~
~ _
c
! !
R S
•
i •
•
~ • •
••
C
~•
R R • • •
R ~ _
R _
R • R
V
RR
q • S= i
^ R c•
_
q W ~9
y~j
ll T73{ ~ 4
R
R
q • 9
i
• q
; R
q R W
~ ~
U
>
'w
Y~••,
t R q= q
;
~ q q
q R R
q R .. •
;
^ R q T
= ••~~ ~ ~ X
~
q
;
R R 4
R q R x' -
RR qq
9 _ R
- R q
q
;
G1 d
~ 6'
~
4
~, Rif
ll`
V
~W
~ R R
R R R •
q • i
;G R i R R
Ri q `
U H ~;
~ ?
~f ~ y
F r i
i uW~
'1
A oe~
S~
OW
t1 S R ~ e R R R S _ R
^ N f ~ d
~ }/
~
q R• q R = R A ~~ 3V ~ L
~ I
a • J~
u
Y ' a ~•
R i
q
O X
S~ L
~ R ~W
_•
•^ ~ p
~ O
i
R _
«
' C.l
q U
~ O
U
+~ _ ~, R S R
~
S 6 I w J
R q
^ q q
R ` 3a~ q O
W
~1
1
! i ~f 1 q
_
R • ~
R R_
w
w
I A~~/\/\
R
R
R
i ~
~V
V
R V/
STAFF REPORT
Project Manager: Molly Hitchcock Date: September 2, 2004
Email: mhitchcock@cstx.gov
Item: Public hearing, discussion, and possible action on an ordinance to rezone
67.69 acres south of Royal Adelade Dr. and west of future Pebble Creek
Parkway and 76.8 acres south of Royal Adelade Dr. and east of future Pebble
Creek Parkway from A-O Agricultural Open to R-1 Single Family Residential.
Applicant: Davis Young representing the Pebble Creek Development Company
Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning with the
condition that any FEMA-designated floodplain remains A-O.
Item Summary: The request is to continue the single family residential
development of Pebble Creek. The tracts, divided from each other by future
Pebble Creek Parkway, abut developed single family and undeveloped A-O to
the north. The 67.69-acre tract is otherwise surrounded by undeveloped lands
owned by the Pebble Creek Development Company and Animate Habitat Ltd.,
while the larger tract is surrounded by Lick Creek Park to the south and east.
•
Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The request is m compliance with the
Land Use Plan, which identifies the area as appropriate for Single Family
Medium Density development, with the exception of some land at the perimeter,
which is identified as Floodplain/Streams.
The Thoroughfare Plan shows the continuation of Pebble Creek Parkway, a
major collection, and St. Andrews Drive, a minor collector, through the 67.69-
acre tract. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment is pending to remove
Congressional, a minor collector, and will be considered by City Council on
September 9. The P&Z considered the request August 19 and recommended
that the minor collector connection be maintained and directed staff to work with
the area residents and developer to identify alternative alignment options and
satisfy the intent of the Thoroughfare Plan.
In 1991, the applicant expressed the desire to have park land in this area. The
Parks Board has identified the area as a 4.54-acre "future park". At this time, it
is the applicant's intent to develop a private park. Parkland dedication
requirements to the City have been met, so this private park would be over and
beyond minimum requirements.
Item Background: The property was annexed in 1994. It is not platted.
•
• Review Criteria: In determining whether to approve, approve with modifications,
or disapprove the proposed Ofhcial Zoning Map amendment, the City Council
shall consider the following matters regarding the proposed amendment:
1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan;
2. Compatibility with the present zoning and conforming uses of nearby property
and with the character of the neighborhood;
3. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by
the district that would be made applicable by the proposed amendment;
4. Suitability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted by
the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed amendment;
5. Marketability of the property affected by the amendment for uses permitted
by the district applicable to the property at the time of the proposed
amendment; and
6. Availability of water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation facilities
generally suitable and adequate for the proposed use.
Commission Action Options: The Commission acts as a recommending body
on the question of rezoning, which will be ultimately decided by City Council.
The Commission options are:
1. Recommend approval of rezoning as submitted;
2. Recommend a less intense zoning classification;
3. Recommend denial;
• 4. Table indefinitely; or,
5. Defer action to a specified date.
Supporting Materials:
1. Location Map
2. Aerial
3. Application
4. Infrastructure and Facilities
5. Land Use Plan
NOTIFICATION:
Legal Notice Publication(s): The Eagle; 8-17-04 and 9-7-04
Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 9-2-04
Advertised Council Hearing Dates: 9-23-04
Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': 55
Response Received: None as of date of staff report.
•
• INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES
Water: There is an existing water system in Pebble Creek. The new
system for this are is required to meet City guidelines per the Subdivision
Regulations. A Water Report is required for the subdivision to ensure
compliance.
Sewer: There is an existing sewer system in Pebble Creek. A Sewer
Report is required for the subdivision to insure capacity and compliance.
Streets: The 67.97-acre tracts shows two future minor collectors on the
property, one of which will tie into a Pebble Creek Parkway extension
and one into a Lakeway extension. The Subdivision Regulations require
that the internal street system must connect to a paved public ROW.
Off-site Easements: It does not appear that any are needed at this time
for utility extensions.
Drainage: Drainage is to Alum Creek and Lick Creek.
Flood Plain: Floodplain is along the southern and eastern boundary of
the subject property. The exhibit showing the area to be rezoned does
propose rezoning of floodplain fringe.
Oversize request: To be determined at platting.
• Impact Fees: None
r~
raphic
N
R "
'~'~ Pr's: j~Rd
~ yt~
-~
O~
M~SS1on
~m
P`~!
,~gtY Ln
M
Q~,.'
G~O~. >'
V'.
Q~~ ! .~C
~Y Rd
tJOtlce: The accureq d this data fs limited to the validity and
sowreq d avabade data, end therefore the City makes
no reproserNatlon or warranties as to lFq, pp~n raq d the data.
Any peAy uskq the data does ~~hhMl31y risk. Ttus date is
produced purausnt tolhe.AubNc Informatlon Act.
O,~
~t
t~
t~
4 4 ~,
tr
t
/~' 4 t t;
f
t
i '~,',
at
R
t
t '~
• ~
• t
~ #
• ~
~' #
w #
• ~
t
,~ + ~
,~ r ~
0~'' 700 1,400 t~ t 2,800 ~ 4,200 5,600
Feet
• r
pr` eV
~ FOR.,QF,FI
C
S S~ ONLY
'~j
C A
E NO.
~
~
~,~ ~~
'
-J DATE SUBMITTED ~ '"'-
Y
BONING MAP AMENDMENT (REZONING) APPLICATION
MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
If a petition for rezoning is denied by the City Council, another application for rezoning shall not be filed within a
period of 180 days from the date of denial, except with permission of the Planning & Zoning Commission or
City Council. The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for consideration:
X Application completed in full.
X $500.00 application fee
X Two (2) copies of a fully dimensioned map on 24" x 36" paper showing:
a. Land affected;
b. Legal description of area of proposed change;
c. Present zoning;
d. Zoning classification of all abutting land; and
e. All public and private rights-of-way and easements bounding and intersecting subject land.
X Written legal description of subject property (metes & bounds or lot 8~ block of subdivision, whichever is
applicable).
X The Rezoning Supporting Information sheet completed in full. A CAD (dxf/dwg) or GIS (shp) digital file
may be required for more complex rezoning requests.
Date of Required Preapplication Conference: ~..~uru. a~ I ~ ~'`'~
APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION:
met Address: 4500 Pebble Creek Parkway
City: College Station State: Texas Zip Code: 77845-8942
E-mail: Davis Y~pebblecreek.org
Phone Number: 979-690-0996 Fax Number:
PLANNER'S INFORMATION:
Name Jessica Guidry Jimmerson -Planning and Land Use Solutions
Street Address 3211 Westwood Main
City Bryan State TX Zip Code 77807
E-Mail Address iiCc~plusplanning.com (Please email staff comments. etc.)
Phone Number 224-4340 Fax Number 775-5107
This property was conveyed to owner by deed, dated 11/01/02 and recorded in Volume 1671 Page
276 of the Brazos County Deed Records.
General Location of Property: South of Royal Adelade Dr. approx. 67.69 acres west of Pebble Creek Pkwv
and approx. 76.8 acres East of Pebble Creek Parkway
Address of Property: none
Legal Description: A020201 S W ROBERTSON (ICL), Tract 14.11. Acres 289.57. Future Phases of
Pebble Creek
I Acreage 144.49 Acres
sting Zoning: A-O Requested Zoning: R-1
Present Use of Property: Vacant
Proposed Use of Property: Residential
6/13/03 Page 1 Of 2
REZONING SUPPORTING INFORMATION
List the changed or changing conditions in the area or in the City which make this zone change necessary.
Development pressure is mounting in the area.
2.) Indicate whether or not this zone change is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. If it is not,
explain why the Plan is incorrect.
This zonin4 change is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan.
3.) List any other reasons to support this zone change.
The applicant has prepared this application and supporting info-mation and certifies that the facts
stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correct. IF APPLICATION /S FILED BY
ANYONE OTHER THAN THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, APPLICATION MUST BE
ACCOMPANIED BYA POWER OF ATTORNEY STATEMENT FROM THE OWNER.
Signature f ow r r agent) or applicant
Date
C7
6h 3/03 Page 2 of 2
•
AGENDA ITEM NO. B
• Unified Development Ordinance
Annual Review
•
~~
COLLEGE S7 A710N
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
Phone (979) 764-3570 /Fax (979) 764-3496
MEMORANDUM
August 26, 2004
TO: Planning & Zoning Commission ~
FROM: Natalie Ruiz, Development a
Jane Kee, City Planner
SUBJECT: Annual Review of the Comprehensive Plan 8c UDO.
When the UDO was adopted in 2003, the City committed to making this
development ordinance a living document. To honor that commitment, a
• stipulation was added that provides for the annual review of the City's
Comprehensive Plan and UDO.
Comprehensive Plan Update:
Several weeks ago the Commission received a report reviewing the
Comprehensive Plan amendments that were completed since creation of the
Long Range Division in 2000 and since adoption of the UDO in 2003. Attached
is a supplement to this report that takes a closer look at the major categories of
land use examining what is planned versus zoned, whether there is compliance
with the Comprehensive Plan and what is zoned and vacant, thus available for
development. This analysis will serve as a starting point for a future
discussion of possible City initiated rezonings.
Proposed changes to the UDO:
Many of the proposed amendments are clerical in nature. As staff has
administered the code over the last year, we have identified several editing
discrepancies and minor clarifications or corrections. The following is a brief
summary of the major changes proposed to the UDO. (A more detailed list is
provided as an attachment.):
• Attached Sign Regulations -With the adoption of the UDO in 2003, we
began regulating the amount of attached signage allowed on a building.
Until that time, there was no limit to the amount of attached signage.
After administering the new regulations for a year, we identified two
• changes that we are proposing with this annual review:
o Allowing additional signage for buildings on corner lots including
the endcaps of shopping centers if a public entrance is provided.
o Establishing commercial banner provisions to allow one banner
per commercial building, tenant lease space or multi-family
development not to exceed 4' x 12'. The current code permits
banners; however, the banner counts against the allowable
attached signage similar to permanent attached signage.
Administering this provision over the last year has been
cumbersome and difficult for the customer to calculate and
understand. As you will recall, staff brought this item before the
Commission for direction earlier this year. The proposed changes
are in accordance with the Commission's direction with one
exception. The P8vZ requested that banners be prohibited in all
design districts. The proposed ordinance prohibits them in Wolf
Pen Creek and the Overlay design districts. Banners are still
allowed in Northgate under the current proposal. Staff
recommends that this issue be addressed with the upcoming
changes to the Northgate ordinance this fall.
• Retail Sales 8v Service -With the adoption of the UDO in 2003, the C-1
General Commercial and C-2 Commercial Industrial zoning districts
became more distinct. Prior to the UDO, these two zoning districts were
almost interchangeable in terms of permitted uses in each district. The
general difference between the two districts is that C-1 is more of a retail
district with no storage and C-2 is more an industrial district with no
retail sales. Staff is proposing a change to the specific use standards
that will allow limited storage in C-1 and limited retail sales in C-2. The
proposed Sales and Service Matrix will help determine the appropriate
uses for each district.
• •'• Sexually-Oriented Businesses (SOB's -The City adopted provisions
covering (SOB's) when the UDO was a opted in 2003. During the annual
review, it was determined that alternative sites need to be made available
to comply with federal case law. The United States Supreme Court has
held that cities cannot totally ban SOB's; however, they can regulate the
location. In the leading case, Renton, the Supreme Court upheld
regulations limiting the SOB's to 5% of the City's geographic area. The
United States Supreme Court held that Renton had provided sufficient
sites for SOB's; therefore, the ordinance was constitutional. In an effort
to obtain 5% of the City's geographic area, staff is proposing to modify
the UDO. The overall concept is to allow SOB's in commercial and
industrial zoning districts with buffering of protected uses, residential
zoning districts and portions of major roadways. In order to achieve this
concept, the following modifications were made to the UDO:
o In addition to C-2 Commercial Industrial and M-2 Heavy Industrial
zoning districts, SOB's will be permitted uses in C-1 General
Commercial, M-1 Light Industrial and R&D Research and
Development zoning districts. Adding these additional zoning
districts still did not provide for 5% of the City's area.
o As a result, three additional areas or tracts of land were added to
reach the 5% requirement. The following tracts were selected
based on their proposed land use according to the City's Land Use
Plan, access to major roadways and distance from existing
residential areas. The UDO includes an amendment that will allow
SOE's as a permitted use on three specific tracts regardless of
• distance separation requirements. These tracts are shown in
purple on the attached SOE map.
o The list of protected uses from SOB's has been modified to only
include the following:
• Elementary & secondary schools
^ Public neighborhood parks
^ Day care centers
^ Colleges & Universities
o Distance separation requirements from SOB's and protected uses
or residential districts have been modified to 400'. (For the
purposes of the SOB ordinance, the A-O Agricultural Open zoning
district is not a residential district.)
o Prohibited locations along major roadways have been modified to
include a 400' setback from the rights-of--way of the following
thoroughfares:
^ Texas Avenue -This includes the portion of Texas Avenue
from the northern city limits line with the City of Bryan to
the Harvey Mitchell Parkway intersection.
^ University Drive -This includes the portion of University
Drive from the Texas Avenue intersection to Earl Rudder
Freeway.
A map is provided as an attachment that shows the location of potential
SOB's as of the date of this memo. Please realize that as areas of the city
develop, rezone, etc. the map will change.
• Driving Ranges -Specific use standards for driving ranges are being
proposed to ensure that adjacent neighborhoods and residential uses are
protected. Driving ranges are currently allowed in the existing code;
however, the proposed standards will provide additional buffering,
screening, lighting and parking requirements.
• The UDO as a Living Document:
Throughout the past year, several efforts have been undertaken to honor the
commitment that the UDO is a living document, including the following:
• As changes and issues were identified, staff brought forward
amendments to modify the UDO. The following is a brief summary of the
amendments approved throughout the past year. (A more detailed list is
provided as an attachment.):
• Design Review Board Membership
• Driveway Access Requirements
• Northgate Zoning District Amendments
• Sign Ordinance Amendments and Clarifications
• Zero Lot Line Construction
• Krenek Tap Overlay District
• The Planning 8v Zoning Commission had a standing item on their regular
agenda to hear visitors specifically on the UDO. During the past year,
there were two issues brought to the Commission's attention and both
resulted in amendments to the UDO. These issues dealt with Northgate
zoning district requirements and zero lot line construction.
• The Comprehensive Plan -Throughout the past year, amendments have
been made to the Comprehensive Plan that were both City-initiated and
property owner initiated. It is required that rezoning requests be in
compliance with the Comprehensive Plan before approval. Simple,
straight forward amendments may be processed along with a rezoning
• request. More complex amendments are processed on a quarterly basis.
This provides time for staff to adequately research and prepare
recommendations. It also allows the Planning & Zoning Commission and
City Council to consider the amendment separately from a specific
development proposal.
• Community Input:
In preparation for the annual review of the UDO, staff compiled several
changes and clarifications of the ordinance throughout the year. We also
solicited input from the community for several months. Once a revised draft of
the UDO was prepared, it was posted on the City's website for public input. As
a result, staff received the following comments:
• Outside Storage and Display -Staff received input from a developer of
Tractor Supply retail centers who requested that we modify the current
outdoor storage and display requirements. He has explored developing a
new stand alone facility and expressed concern that the current outside
storage and display requirements are too restrictive. Staff looked into his
concerns and determined that the current requirements, while
restrictive, are critical from a community appearance standpoint. The
current ordinance provisions allow limited outdoor storage and display;
however, the amount proposed by Tractor Supply would need to be
located indoors or completely screened from view.
• Attached Signage Requirements -Staff received input from a local sign
contractor regarding the current attached sign requirements. He
expressed concern that limiting the amount of attached signage also
limits the creativity and the overall aesthetics of the sign. Staff looked
into this issue and determined that generally, the attached signage
requirements are adequate. However, provisions were added for
buildings with multiple entrances. Buildings on corner lots or lease
• spaces at the end of a shopping center may have additional attached
signage if they provide a public entrance.
• Freestanding Signage Requirements - Staff received input from the
College Station Med regarding freestanding signage requirements and the
health and safety needs of their site and other medical campuses. Given
the fact that hospitals contain an emergency room, there is a special
need to direct traffic from the street to the correct entrance. In response
to this need, staff revised the sign regulations to provide additional
signage for hospitals.
Staff also hosted a UDO Community Work Session on July 27~ to review the
proposed changes and solicit input. A total of seven community members
attended and the input received regarding the UDO and the annual review was
extremely positive. There were three comments that were outside the scope of
the annual review; but, will be considered with future amendments:
• Northgate Ordinance Amendments - A suggestion was made to have a
similar work session for the upcoming Northgate ordinance changes.
The attendees preferred the informal setting with staff to discuss the
proposed ordinance changes.
:• Subdivision Regulations & Drainage Development Standards -The
current process for revising the joint development standards in Bryan &
College Station has worked well; however, it is very time consuming for
city staff. A suggestion was made to hire an outside facilitator to lead the
weekly meetings and make necessary changes to the text. The current
process is a good one and allows collaboration between the local
• community and city staff. A third-party facilitator could help in drafting
the new ordinance and mediate changes to the Subdivision Regulations.
• Commercial Zoning Districts - Is there a need for both C-1 General
Commercial and C-2 Commercial Industrial zoning districts or should
• they be combined? Given the current neighborhood protection
standards, is there still a need to separate the two zoning distracts? We
discussed the pros and cons of combining the two districts and
determined that this is a much larger issue that should be handled
outside of the annual UDO review. As part of the City Council's strategic
plan on redevelopment, staff will explore this issue further.
Where do we ao from here?
The Commission should make a recommendation to the City Council on the
proposed changes to the UDO. In addition, there are many amendments that
are underway now or soon will be, including:
• Northgate Design District - Modifying the current regulations and
development standards to comply with the adopted Redevelopment Plan.
• Drainage Ordinance -Updating the current drainage ordinance and
design standards to be incorporated into the UDO and the joint B/CS
Design Standards.
• Subdivision Regulations, Article 8 -Modifying the current regulations
and incorporating them into the UDO.
• Comprehensive Plan Amendments -Both City-initiated and property
owner initiated amendments to deal with areas of rapid growth.
• UDO - As issues are identified or new development trends that may
prompt amending the current ordinance.
•
Attachments:
List of proposed changes to the UDO
List of changes made to the UDO in the past year
SOE map reflecting potential locations
Comp Plan Summary
Revised UDO -Articles 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9 8s portions of 11
•
COLLEGE STATION COMPREHENSI~/E PLAN
SUPPLEMENT -LAND USE ANALYSIS
Despite the number of different land uses and zoning districts in the City of
College Station, most fall into one of three categories: Residential, Commeraal,
and Industrial. Uses that fall into these categories account for more than. half of
all planned land uses, and 75 percent of all zoning.
Residential Uses
As the table below shows, more than 35 percent of land is planned for residenllal
use (10,674 AC) as shown on the City of College Station Comprehensive Land
Use Plan. Single-family medium density residential makes up more than half of
these planned acres (6,272 AC).
Planned for Residential
•
SINGLE-FAMILY/MEDIUM DENSITY 6,271.64 20.72%
SINGLE-FAMILY/LOW DENSITY 2,701.29 8.92°~
RESIDENTIAL ATTACHED 1,044.21 3.45%
SINGLE-FAMILY/HIGH DENSITY 657.47 2.17%
Total 10,675 35°~
Additional areas designated on the land use plan for residential uses, but not yet
zoned as such, are located primarily east of SH 6 and north of Rock Prairie Road
in the Rock Prairie/Gfeens Prairie Small Area Plan area. These areas are
currently zoned A-O.
Current zoning allows for more than 8,000 acres of residential development,
accounting for 27 percent of all zoning in the city. Presently, all established
residential zoning conforms to the Comprehensive Plan.
Zoned for Residential
~-
R-1 Single-Family 5,822.09 19%
R-4 Multi-Family 839.22 3°k
A-OR Rural Subdivision 603.30 2%
R-6 High Density Multi-Family 517.59 2%
R-2 Duplex 310.05 1
R-3 Townhouse 110.12 0%
R-1 B Single-Family (B) 58.82 0%
R-7 Manufactured Home Park 24.83 0%
Totai 8,286 27°~
Available for Residential
The city also maintains information about existing land uses. By evaluating
current rurel, vacant, or othennrise unimproved land, it is possible to get an idea
of land available for future growth. The table below illustrates unimproved or
available land that is zoned residential in accordance with the land use plan.
Overall, there are 5,276 acres of land available for residential development in the
city limits. Some of this land falls within floodplain areas.
Zoning
accommodates
Residential
A-O Pl
68.12 anned for i
1,71'1.52 4asidehtiai
2 376.42 71.13
Total
4,227.19
R-1 21.12 18.43 562.9 24.66 627.11
A-OR 168.28 17.78 186.06
R-4 82.49 21.84 8.3 41.58 154.01
R-2 29.81 1.44 51.05
R-3 0.19 24.86 25.05
R-18 18.4 18.4
R-6 0.08 5.45 2.17 7.7
R-~ 0.08 0.0$
Total 172 1,938.27 3,02b.4 140.88 5 276.65
u
Commercial Uses
Presently there are 1,723 acres of the city planned for commercial and retail uses
on the City of College Station Comprehensive Land Use Plan. This accounts for
5.7 percent of the entire city.
Planned for Commercial
REGIONAL RETAIL 1,434.34 4.74°6
OFFICE. 255.87 0.8596
NEIGHBQRHOQD RETAIL 32.93 0.11°~
Total 1,723 6%
College Station has 1,785 acres of land with some sort of commercial zoning
designation. More than 300 acres of commercal zoning does not conform to the
Comprehensive Plan. These acres are dispersed throughout the city, primarily in
tracts less than ten acres in areas designated as residential on the land use plan
(see following map).
City of College Station
•
/ .\ ri'
~~ ••~ ~
;• Commercial tones
~ ~~ ~~/~~ .`~• Not In Compliance
r ~ ~ ~• ~ ~ 4
Wlth Plan
~~ :~ r-rJ'~`'.~!
~
~~
• ~ ,z,
4 PlatBasemap
~
•~
~
`,
~ L.i GH LNnN
L
~ r
~' ~
, ,
~., Existing land Use
~
''~ /
~
~ ~ Rural or Unhnproved
~` ~ ` (,.~s,'~ ~ Developed
~~
~.
•
.`•f '
1
/, ~ft
'
~~J ~
Y r /~
/ '
y
y .~..~
,~.~~
~~
~~
'~
~. ,~
., ~
~l• ~ jt
~ ,~•
/ r-
.
( y:
f
~~
~
\
c' ./•
~,.~t` 0.5 1 Miles
v
'\
~•.~
~~ ,
~ ~
~ r^•~-__~
Existing commercial zoning not In accorcfance with the comprehensive land use plan - Gty of college Station
Commercial zoning is permitted in the Wolf Pen Creek, Northgate, and Texas
Avenue Redevelopment areas but is not specifically designated as office or retail
on the land use plan (122 acres). These are not included as non-conforming
zoning classifications.
Available for Commercial
There are currently 730 acres of vacant commercially zoned land that also
complies with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan.
Industrial/ Research and Development
College Station's Land Use Plan incorporates over 1,400 acres of uses planned
for industrial, research, and or development. This amounts to almost 5 percent of
all land uses.
Four types of industrial zoning make up 4.24 percent of zoning in the city, with
M-1 making up more than 90 percent of all industrial uses.
• Only 230 acres of current industrial zoning does not conform to the land use
plan. Of these acres, 150 can be attributed to Veteran's Park in the 30/80 area.
This is designated as park on the Land Use Plan, but currently holds a zoning of
M-1 Industrial. This area is highlighted in the map below, which also includes all
nonconforming industrial zoning.
City of College Station
•
E
~ ~ Inc~strfal Zones
;"
~•~ ~~ .~~, : ` Not in Compliance
/ ~ ~~ With Plan
.~ ~,
.•
~~ ''~ ~
•'~ /1 ~•.,~,, Plat Basanap
S ~ Nonconforming
ti~
•'~"~
:~ ~..•
1,` i ~l
•% ~ .,-~
.f ~ ~ ~ / 1
~'" / s• t
••~
y ~ -h
/^,.' t ~
5S! ..;~'
l.. p'~ o.s ~ Miles •`i
v .,~~ •`
M~~~~y mausuia~ zoning not m accordance with the comprehensive land use plan -City of College Stadon
Available for Industrial
Zoning Land Use Desi nation
-: ~
A-O 762.63
M-1 281.94
R&D 22 79
M-2 11.74
C-2 3.77
Total 1,082.87
C7
Currently, there are over 1,000 acres of available land for industrial uses. These
areas are located primarily in A-O zones.
•
Changes Proposed to the UDO
• 2004 Annual Review
All changes to the Northgate design district have been removed
from this list and will be considered at a future date
• The correction of editing discrepancies (spelling, capitalization,
numbering, etc.)
• Section 2.2.D "Powers & Duties" to clarify that the Planning & Zoning
Commission considers appeals of the Administrator's interpretation of
the Subdivision Regulations.
• Section 2.4 A "Creation" to clarify that the Design Review Board is
responsible for reviewing sign issues in design districts
• Section 2.5.8.2 "Interpretation" to clarify that the Administrator is
responsible for interpreting the provisions of the UDO and to add that
the Administrator is responsible for interpreting the Subdivision
Regulations.
• Sections 3.1 "General A royal Procedures" and 3.3 "Subdivision PI t
pp a
Review" to consistently use "submitted" and "filed"
• Section 3.1.6 "Preapplication Conference" clarifying the purpose of a
preapplication conference and stating that such meeting does not vest
a development proposal. The Administrator may waive the
requirement for a mandatory conference.
• Section 3.3 "Subdivision Plat Review" to incorporate language
regarding ET] plats and joint review of ET] plats with the county.
• Section 3.14 "Written Interpretation" and Section 3.17 "Administrative
Appeals" to clarify that the Administrator is responsible for interpreting
the Subdivision Regulations and the Planning & Zoning Commission
considers appeals.
• Section 5.1.G "Multi-Family R-4" and 5.1.H "High Density Multi-Family
R-6" to remove R-1 single family as a supplemental standard.
• Section 5.2 "Residential Dimensional Standards" to remove the
. minimum lot depth requirement in an R-4 Multi-Family zoning district
& reduce the rear setback requirement in R-1B zoning districts from
25' to 20' to match the setbacks in R-1 zoning districts.
• Section 5.8 "Overlay Districts" to clarify sign regulations in the
Corridor Overlay District.
• Section 6.2.C "Use Table" to include:
^ Driving Ranges as a permitted use subject to specific use standards
in A-O Agricultural-Open, C-1 General Commercial, C-2
Commercial-Industrial, and P-MUD Planned Mixed-Use District
^ Retail Sales and Service as a permitted use subject to specific use
standards in C-1 General Commercial
^ Retail Sales and Service as a permitted use subject to specific use
standards in C-2 Commercial-Industrial
^ Storage, Self-Service as a permitted use subject to specific use
standards in C-3 Light Commercial
^ Sexually-oriented Businesses as a permitted use subject to specific
use standards in C-1 General Commercial, R&D Research and
Development and M-1 Planned Industrial
• Section 6.3 "Specific Use Standards" to add the specific use standards
for driving ranges.
• Section 6.3 "Specific Use Standards" to add the specific use standards
that will distinguish retail sales and services appropriate for C-1 from
those appropriate for C-2.
• Section 6.3 "Specific Use Standards" to modify the current specific use
standards for sexually-oriented businesses.
• Section 6.3.Q.2.b "Intermediate Facilities" to include new transmission
towers that do not extend more than 3S feet above a support structure
and meet the definition of stealth as determined by the Administrator.
• Section 7.1.E "More Than One Principal Structure on a Lot or Parcel" to
clarify that more than one duplex cannot be built on a lot.
• Section 7.2.C "Dimensions and Access" to include the minimum
standards for parallel parking spaces
• Section 7.2.H "Number of Off-Street Spaces Required":
o To remove the number of required parking spaces of Shopping
Centers of different square footages.
o To define a sexually oriented business as an intense use in a C-2
shopping center.
• o To clarify that places of worship are required to provide
additional spaces for accessory uses.
o To add the number of required parking spaces of:
^ Driving Range as l:tee station
^ Retail Sales and Service (C-1) as 1:250 sq.ft.
^ Retail Sales and Service (C-2) as 1:350 sq.ft.
^ Self-Serve Car Wash as 1:car wash bay/vacuum bay
^ Shopping Center (C-1) as 1:250 sq.ft.
^ Shopping Center (C-2) as 1:350 sq.ft.
• Section 7.3.8.1(b) "Minor Collector Streets" to allow residential
driveways onto minor collector streets when permitted by the Planning
and Zoning Commission through the platting of the property.
• Section 7.3.C.7 "Geometric Design of Driveway Access" to reference
the gated residential community guidelines in Section 8.W.3,
Subdivision Regulations.
• Section 7.4 "Signs" to allow for entry and identification signs for design
districts.
• Section 7.4.D "Prohibited Signs" to allow for grand opening and special
event signage.
• Section 7.4.E "Exempt Signs" to include the right of an individual to
carry anon-commercial sign on private property with the owner's
permission and public property as long as the person and sign, by their
location, do not impede traffic safety. Also, adding Special District
Identification Signs as an exempt sign.
• Section 7.4.F. "Sign Standards" to allow multi-family developments to
have one freestanding sign per street frontage instead of one sign per
building plot. Also incorporated the commercial banner requirements.
• Section 7.4.H.1 "Apartment/Condominium/Manufactured Home Park
Identification Signs" to clarify that one freestanding sign is allowed per
street frontage. This section was also modified to allow the property
owner to split the allowable square footage of a freestanding sign into
two signs at a single entrance point.
• Section 7.4.I.6 "Attached Signs" to clarify that signage may be
attached to an architectural element of a building and to define what is
considered as an architectural element of a building.
• Section 7.4.] "Commercial Banner" to establish banner requirements
for commercial and multi-family uses.
• Section 7.4.N Freestanding Commercial Signs modified to allow fuel
price signs to be incorporated into the freestanding sign.
• Section 7.4.P "Grand Opening Signs" to establish temporary signage
for grand opening events for new businesses.
• Section 7.4.U "Special Event Signs" to allow signage for permitted
special events.
• Section 7.5.C "Landscaping Requirements" to remove the requirement
that live oaks be planted at a minimum of 30 feet behind a street curb
• Section 7.6.F.2 "Plantings" to clarify the planting requirements when a
fence or wall is and is not required.
• Section 7.6.F.3 "Fences and Walls" to clarify what "finished" means for
buffer walls
• Section 7.6.F.4 "Substitutions" to clarify that doubling or tripling a
buffer yard includes the buffer yard and the required plantings.
• Section 9.3.A "Enlargement, Alteration" to include nonconforming
parking lots, parking structures, and parking areas as structures that
may be enlarged or altered as long as the enlargement or alteration
• complies with the terms of the UDO
• Section 11.2 "Defined Terms" to amend the definition of:
^ Shopping centers to two or more or more uses instead of three
^ Stealth tower and stealth antenna to clarify the necessity to blend
into the surrounding environment
^ Family to clarify the relationship of the family members per the
Neighborhood Task Force recommendations
^ Group Home to reference the Human Resources Code
^ Pad Site to include multiple tenant structures.
• Section 11.2 "Defined Terms" to remove the definition of "Submitted"
• Section 11.2 "Defined Terms" to add the definitions:
^ Architectural Element
^ Special District Identification Sign
^ Commercial Banner
^ Field Size for Driving Ranges
^ Parking (Side or Rear Yard)
•
Changes Made to UDO since Adoption
DRB Membership (July 10, 2003
Section 2.4.B "Membership and Terms" was modified to clarify the
membership of the Design Review Board.
Driveway Access on Corner Lots (August 28, 2003)...:.
Section 7.3.C.2.d "Location of Driveway Access" was modified to state
that on corner residential lots, side access driveways shall be subject
to rear building setback requirements. (Aug. 28, 2003)
Northaate Ordinance Revisions (September 9. 2003):
Section 6.2.C "Use Table" was modified to allow night clubs, bars, or
• taverns as permitted uses in NG-1 Core Northgate and NG-2
Commercial Northgate.
Section 5.7 "Design District Dimensional Standards" was modified to:
^ create a maximum setback from aright-of-way,
^ delete the required front, side, and rear setbacks, and
^ delete the maximum height in all Northgate zoning districts.
It was also modified to:
^ create a minimum height of two stories and
^ create a minimum floor to area ration of 1 for NG-1 Core Northgate
and NG-3 Residential Northgate.
Sian Ordinance Changes (September 9, 2003):
Section 7.4.C "Summary of Permitted Signs" was modified to show C-3
on the chart.
Section 7.4.E.7 "Exempt Signs" was modified to clarify that hand-held
signs must be on-premise and are subject to time limitations.
• Section 7.4.I.2 "Attached Signs" was modified to regulate attached
signage based on building or lease space and not on the entire
development site.
Sections 7.4.M.7.a and 7.4.M.7.b "Freestanding Commercial Signs"
• were modified to clarify that the frontage considerations for more than
one freestanding sign are for streets classified as major arterials or
higher.
Section 7.4.T "Signs for Conditional Uses" was modified to allow
conditional uses in residential or agricultural zoning districts to use low
profile sign requirements.
Section 7.4.U "Signs for Permitted Non-Residential Uses in Residential
or Agricultural Districts" was added to allow non-residential, permitted
uses in residential or agricultural zoning districts to use low profile sign
requirements.
Measuring Sign Area -Clarification (November 25, 2003
Section 7.4.F "Sign Standards" was modified to clarify how the
determinations of the area for all signs are completed.
Zero Lot Line Construction (March 25, 2004):
• Section 8.2 "Lot Line Construction" was modified t ali n the
o g
requirements of zero lot line construction between the UDO and the
2000 International Residential Code.
Section 11.2 "Defined Terms" was modified to align definitions
between the UDO and the 2000 International Residential Code.
Krenek Tap Overlay District (April 8, 2004):
Section 5.8.C "Krenek Tap Overlay District" was added to create an
overlay district that would provide for consistent development of
office, retail, and residential uses in the area of the new City Centre
Complex.
Section 2.4.D "Power and Duties" was modified to include Design
Review Board review of building and fence materials and fence height
in the Krenek Tap Overlay District.
•
0
N ~
- ~ !n
o _
~, o ~
o ~
n
l X ~'
a
-; ~ ~
~ c~
" ~'
o
,.
~ ~,
~ ~
~n
~ _ _
.. _. _..
~ ,
`. ~: ~
\ ,.
~ .
I
i ,~
~`
..
~ i
_
~
.__._
_~
(
.
,~\
~ ~
i
i
Y,
' ,/ ,\
~'~
,
\
\
\1
~ -;~
~ j
o m Z'
~N~~
~~;d„ _.
~~_~ ~ .--
5
~maa~ ~ ... ._. .- Qi1`
-~om~ ~'*
~~dd~ ~
"~m~ ~
~~Nmd ! ~
,. nA
nm ~ m'3 ! Q~
S ~ m
~~~r~ 3' E o `S
~ ~ n
o x ~ A <
Dti=~ m
~~~3a
m° n x
m d m
R. m
`off
6a~
a
~~h
J~
~^
\^/t
W•
D
~,
~°~,F.~
A
d
~~O'
..~
~/
,i
~~~ ~~
~~~ ti
,
*
V
,
N /
} ~
~
~~
,,
~., to m
~
'~
,
a~ '
~ O
.~,~
°6~: , G C7
~~ ~ ~ a~
< ~ ~
~
~a
`
~
~
~
a~~~ ~ ~
l
o ~~ 1~ ~ Z
~
a ~,
~~r
~' ,.
yy
a
~
0
~
~,
,,
~
oo
a
,/f ~ Y
O
<
~ ~~ m
,
.~~
~'~
/ \ .
`~ > ~~ ~
~ tD `~' '1 ~ ~ F
o ~ ~~~ ~-./~~ co. ~
-~~ ~, ~' y
\ o ,;
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ %
>,, ~ ~ ~, /
~~ \ ~ IV y /
~ ~ ~,
o ~~ ~. i :'
i ~ o /~ ~,5
% ~~ / ~ ~~ moo,
(D i.~ I
~ ~~y ~ ~~ ~~~~ j
~~~ ~~
~~~/ ~~
0
/ ~~ ~ ~~9i~ ~.
r,, v .~~;
` ~ ~i~ ~/ ~~ V?
~~
y~ ~
5 ~
dk ~~
,~ ~~ _
~' ~~`~ D
~~ ~ •
~ ~
,~ / c, -
° t~
m
ed ~o~t %~
j -1
~ rn
/~ , %~ ~ v
c~ r
~. ~~-,• O
,~ - -
n
~ ~
~~~omo ~
~~R
v c~ 2 n Z
-~o
o ~ F v ~
m a
n ry
~~_ ~ o
~~~~ _
~+ m S m' 3
~=~~a ~
ax ~~ 0
D ti ~
'~~.~3a
dog rn
~m
/ \\
o ~ ~ ~~? ~~~~ % ~~i~` /
m `
v ~ -= '~.
N
O _ `^^
0
o ~ ~ ~ ,
~ ~
~~ i
% d~
/~
o c o
o ~ - i
T
~ ~~ ~ ~ ~
'/ N
i ~ n
~~ ~ ~ ~
i ~ j / ii ~
/ /
(/~
~ v
~ rn
~' ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ rn ~~~ i
w -~ v
c~ r
~• O
~ n
~~
~~~ooo c~ -
~~ amp ~ 0
~$~~~..
o~~~~ - Z
-~d -
~~~m~ w
=soma
°dfm
s-deo
'°~,~_
~A m~
'"N"
d m
~mN~m ~~
_o~
finsA3
-A
~~ga~
~'~"" O
»s>d
--~3a m
-m°n
R ~ ._~-___ __ ~~
r__-_