Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/05/2005 - Agenda Packet - Planning & Zoning Commission• .. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, Planning and Development .Services AGENDA Workshop Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, May 5, 2005, at 5:00 p.m. Council Chambers City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 1. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the status of the draft Subdivision Regulations. 2. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. 3. Discussion of minor and amending plats approved by Staff. ,.... None 4. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding status of I'&Z Plan of Work. 5. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding P&Z meeting schedule. 6. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding discussion of Agenda for joint meeting with Bryan P&L. 7. Presentation, discussion, and possible action of UDO/Comprehensive Plan Annual Review. 8. Adjourn Consultation with- Attorney {Gov`t Code Section 551071 ;possible action "I'he Planning and "Coning Commission may seek advice from its attorney regarding a pending and contemplated litigation subject or attorney-client privileged information. After executive session discussion, any final action or vote taken will be in public. If litigation or attorney-client privileged information issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this Platuung and Zoning Commission meeting, an executive session will be held. 'T'his building is wheelchair accessible. Handicapped parking spaces are available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call 979-764-3517 or (TDD) 1-800-735- 2989. Agendas posted on Internet Website http://www.cstx.gov and Cable Access Channel 19. • CITY OE COLLEGE STATION Planning cr Lkvtlapment 5ers+ias AGENDA Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, May 5, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers, College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue Colle#;e Station, Texas 1. dear Ci, ' ens. At this time, the Chairman will open the floor to citizens wishing to address the Commission on planning and zoning issues not already scheduled an tonight's agenda. The citizen presentations will be limited to three minutes in order to accommodate everyone who wishes to address the Commission and to allow adequate time for completion of the agenda items. `The Commission will receive the information, ask city staff to look into the matter, or will place the matter on a future agenda for discussion. {A recording is made of the meeting; please give your name and address for the record.) • .All matter, listed under .Item 2, Consent Agenda, are considered mtrtine by the Planning and Zoning Commission and luill be enacted by one motia~. These items include preliminary and final plat, where staff has found compliance urith all mrnrmum subdivi3ion regulations. All items appror~d by Consent are cppror.~d unth any and all staff rectimmendations. There WWII not be separate disc~rssion of these items. If any Commissioner desires to dr:,~cuss an item on the Consent Agenda it will be moved to the RegrelurAgenda, forfurrher considtt~ian. 2. ~A~~enda 2.1 Discussion and possible action on: Minutes -April 19, 2005, Workshop Meeting Minutes -April 19, 2005, Regular Meeting Iteg~ar Agenda. 3. Consideration, discussion and possible action on request(s) for absence from meetings. Scott Shafer - IViay 19, 2005, Meeting 4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. .7 5. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Replat and Preliminary Plat for the Century Hill Developmetrt consisting of 15 of lots on 36.92 acres, generally located at 1595 Sebesta Road, east of the Earl Rudder Freeway (SH 6). Case #04-263 (TF) • 5. Presentation discussion and ossible action on a re nest to re-consider a rezonin within P q g 180 days of denial for Callaway Subdivision Phase II, approximatly 14 acres, located on the east side of Marion Pugh Drive, approximately S00' south of the intersection of George Bush Drive, including a portion of the Luther Street Right-of--Way. Case #04-28 (JP) 7. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible acrian on a Final Plat -Residential for Shenandaah Phase 19 (which includes a Replat of Lot 1 Block 11 and Lot 17 Block 8 from Shenandoah Phase 1). This final plat consists of 56 residential lots and an HUA common area on 19.486 acres generally located at 4000 Alexandria Ave. Case #05-46 (MH) 8. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 9. Adjourn. • &~uJ,g~n with Attorney {QQy't Code Section 561.071 ; ooreibieli~~ Tha Planning and Zoning Commission may seek advice from its attorney regarding a pending and contemplated litigation subject or attorney-client privileged information. After executive session discussion, any final action or vote taken wlli be in public. If litigation or attorney-client privileged information issues arise as to the posted subject matter of this Planning and Zoning Commission maatinp, an executive session will be held. This building Is wheelchair accessible. Handicapped parking spaces era available. Any request for sign interpretive service must be made 48 hours before th• meeting. To make arrangements call 979-764-3517 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. Agendas posted on Intemat Websita httRJ/~wrw.cstx.aav and Cable Access Channel I9. • MINUTES U '~I CITY OF COI,LE.GE S'I'AI'ION Planning c~i' De~~elopment Scrvzcer Workshop Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Tuesday, April 19, 2005, at 6:00 p.m. Administrative Conference Room College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman Shafer, Commissioners Fedora, Nichols, Hooton and White. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Commissioners Davis and Reynolds. CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilman Maloney. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF .PRESENT: Staff Planners Boyer, Hitchcock, Prochazka, and Reeves, Senior Planner Fletcher,. Director Dunn, Graduate Civil Engineers Cotter, Gibbs and Norton, Transportation Planner Fogle, and Staff Assistant Lindgren. • OTHER CITY STAFF PRESENT: Senior Assistant City Attorney Robinson. 1. Discussion of consent and regular agenda items. Commissioner White asked for clarification as to why the College Station ISD had changed their location for the elementary school. Commissioner Fedora stated that the reason for the relocation of the elementary school was that they did not want to build the streets shown on the Thoroughfare Plan for that property. Commissioner Fedora asked for clarification regarding the construction of Eagle Avenue with Westfield Village Phases 1-6. Molly Hitchcock, Staff Planner, stated that Eagle Avenue would be constructed on the subject property and would end at the College Station Independent School District's property. Chairman Shafer asked if there would be sidewalks on both sides of Victoria. Hitchcock stated that there would be. Chairman Shafer also asked for the reasoning as to why the greenbelt was located along the property edge instead of within the development. Hitchcock stated that the location of the greenbelt was approved as part of the PDD that came through when council and P&Z were reviewing the concept plan. Hitchcock stated that the thought was that there would be quite a bit of green space through the subdivision that would eventually link up to the Greenways property located behind phase 6, and then there would • be a neighborhood park and the school property. P&Z Workshop Minutes April 19, 2005 Page 1 of 3 Commissioner Nichols asked for clarification on the connectivity of the street and bike trail for Horse Haven. Jennifer Prochazka, Staff Planner, stated that there • were two access paints shown on the plat that were 10 foot wide public, pedestrian and bike easements going back to the greenways. Commissioner White asked if we had completed enough research regarding the nightclub proposal to make sure it was far away enough from day care centers, churches, etc. Lindsay Boyer, Staff Planner, stated that the ordinance required a 300 foot separation from public schools, day care centers and churches for alcohol sales. Boyer stated that the club was 600 feet from the church in this area. Commissioner Shafer asked for clarification regarding the operating hours of the club and Kindern-usic, a nearby music school. CommissionerNichols stated his concerns were the parking in this area. Boyer gave clarification on the operating hours and parking concerns. There was more discussion among Commissioners and Staff regarding the operating hours, smoking Nand the definition of a night club. Chairman Shafer asked why there was not a public hearing on Item 5 for the replat of F.S. Kapchinski Subdivision. Jennifer Prochazka, Staff Planner, stated that variance requests did not require a public hearing. Prochazka stated that there would be a public hearing for the replat. 2. Discussion of minor and amending plats approved by Staff. Hitchcock gave a presentation regarding the Riviera Addition, Case #OS-35. • 3. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding status of P&Z Plan of Work. Joey Dunn, .Director, discussed items on the Plan of Work. Dunn also stated that a tentative date for a joint P&Z meeting with the City of Bryan P&Z Commission and the City of College Station P&Z Commission had been scheduled for June 30, 2005. Commissioners reviewed the Plan of Work and had discussion regarding the annexation plan and subdivision regulations. Commissioners discussed updates on the Plan of Work and discussed the interest and priority of each one. 4. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the status of the draft Subdivision Regulations. Dunn stated that this agenda item would be rescheduled for a special workshop meeting in order for Commissioners to meet with Mark Smith, Director of Public Works. 5. Presentation, discussion, and possible action regarding the development of a possible corridor study for the Wellborn Road Gateway Corridor from Greens Prairie Road to TAMU. Dunn introduced Councilman Maloney and thanked him for attending the workshop meeting. Dunn gave a small presentation regarding the corridor study. P&Z Workshop Minutes April 19, 2005 Page 2 of 3 Councilman Maloney spoke briefly about the improvements on Wellborn Road. He also spoke about our Community and the improvements that have been made. • Maloney alsa stated that planning is a key to the future development of our Community. Ken Fogle, Transportation Planner, gave a presentation regarding the changes and improvements on Wellborn Road, FM 2818, George Bush Drive and Harvey Mitchell Road that were planned by the Texas Department of Transportatian. The Commission discussed forming asub-committee for the development of a possible corridor study for the Wellborn Road Gateway Corridor from Greens Prairie Road to TAMU. 6. Presentation, discussion, and possible action of UDO/Comprehensive Plan Annual Review. Dunn stated that this item would also be moved to the next agenda on May 5, 2005, due to time constraints during this meeting. ?. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. Prochazka stated that statfreceived a training CD-ROM from the American Planning Association called "Paying for Growth." She asked if the • Commissioners wanted to considerhaving aspecial meeting to view the CD- ROM. Commissioners discussed wo potential special workshops in the future, one with Mark Smith regarding the Subdivision Regulations and the other for training on "Paying for Growth". 8. Adjourn Commissioner White motioned to adjourn. Commissioner Fedora seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). Approved: Scott Shafer, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Attest: Lisa Lindgren, Staff Assistant • Planning and Development Services P&Z Workshop Minutes April 19, 2005 Page 3 of 3 • CITY OF COLLEGES"I'A1'ION Planning v~' I~n~elupment Services MINUTES Regular Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Tuesday, April 19, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers, College Station City Hall 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chairman Shafer, C:omtnissioners Fedora, Nichols, Hooton and White. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Comnussioncrs Davis. and Reynolds. CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilman Maloney. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF PRESENT: Staff Planners foyer, Hitchcock, Reeves and Prochazka, Senior Planner Fletcher, Director Dunn, CJraduate Civil Engineers Cotter, Gibbs and Norton, `l'ransportation Planner Fogle, and Staff lssistant I.indgicn. • OTHER CITY STAFF PRESENT: Senior 1~ssistant Cit<~ ~lttorncy Robinson and Bryan Cook, O"'IS. 1. Hear Visitors No visitor spoke. 2. Consent Agenda 2:1 Discussion and possible action on: Minutes - Apri17, 2005, Workshop ivfeeting Minutes - r3pri17, 2005, Regular Meeting 2.2 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat for Horse Haven Phase 3, consisting of 53 lots on 12.06 acres, generally located at Earl Rudder Freeway and Horse Haven Lane. Case #04-283 QP/JN) 2.3 Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for Westfield Village Phases 1-6, consisting of 310 residential lots on 75.651 acres generally located north of Graham Road and east of Victoria. Case #05-36 (CC) • Commissioner Nichols motioned to approve the consent agenda. Commissioner White seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). P&Z Minutes Regular Agenda, April 19, 2005 Page 1 of 5 Regular Agenda • 3. Consideration, discussion and possible action on request(s) for absence from meetings. .Ken Reynolds -11pri1 19, 2005, Fleeting Bill Davis -April 19, 2005, Fleeting Commissioner White motioned to approve absence requests. Commissioner Fedora seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). 4. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent ilgenda by Commission action. None 5. Presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Variance Request to Section 18 of the Subdivision Regulations and public hearing, present<~tori, discussion, and possible action on a Replat for the 1~.S. Kapchinski Subdivision, 1.,ot 12, Block 1, consisting of ttvo lots on 0.478 acres, located at 1612 Park Place. Case #05-26 QF/CC} Jennifer 1?rochazka, Staff Planner, gave a presentation on the variance request and replat for the F.S. Kapchinski Subdivision. In response to ownership questions that arose at the Flarch "17, 2005 meeting, Prochazka stated that a title report was reviewed by the City and properrc~ ownership was shown in the name of Ricky Willburn. She also stated that the variance anci the resulting plat were in comj~liance with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommended approval of the replat provided that the variance was First approved by the Commission. Commissioner Nichols motioned to, xemove the Variance Request from the table. Commissioner Fedora seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). Commissioner White motioned. for approval of the Variance Request to Section 18 of the Subdivision Regulations. Commissioner Hooton seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0}. Marcus Townsend, no address given, spoke against the replat. Flr. Townsend expressed concerns of unclear of property ownership boundaries that affected the property= in question, as well as his faniil~>'s property. Charles ^1hompson, 1608 Park Place, College Station, Texas. Mr. "Thompson expressed concerns regarding the title of this property and spoke in opposition of the replat .Ali Jaffar, ilpplicant, 251 Westwood Main, Bryan, Texas. Mr. Jaffar spoke in favor for the replat.. i'ts the applicant, Mr. Jaffar provided a recent title report. "Phis title report verified that Rickey D. WilbLUn had clear title of the property= in question. i~lr. _Jaffar stated that they had three surveyors survey this lot and they all showed clear title on the lot. Commissioners asked questions of F.1r. Thompson, Flr. Townsend, Mr. Jaffar and Jennifer Prochazka in order to get clarification regarding the clear title of the lot. Commissioners commented that they appreciated the concerns of Mr. 'Townsend and Mr. Thompson, but that the concerns and issues they had would have to be addressed through a different entity, . and that Planning and Zoning Commission would not be able to assist them with the issues they had regarding the title of the properti5=. Commissioners discussed that staff had done P&Z Minutes Regular Agenda, April 19, 2005 Page 2 of 5 what was asked of them at the 1~larch 17, 2005 meeting in order to insure clear title to this lot. • Commissioner Nichols rnationed to approve the replat of the lot. Commissioner Hooton seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). ~i. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Rezoning for Lot lA, I..ot 16, and the southeast 25 feet of Lot 15, College 1-Icights I31ock D, generally located at the intersection of University Drive and hlacarthur Street, and north of the intersection of University Drive and Nimitz Street, from PDD Planned Development District, r1-P Administrative Professional and R-2 Duplex Residential to P-MUD P1~anned Mixed Use District. Case #05-37 (JP) Jennifer Prochazka, Staff Planner, gave a presentation regarding the rezoning and stated that staff recommended approval. Three phone calls had been received in opp~sti~n to the rezoning. Benjamui Knox, Applicant, 405 University Drive 1~;ast; College Station, "i'exas. I~Ir. IinOx spoke to the Commission regarding the plans for' the ;property if the rezoning were approved. hlr. Knox provided a dra~vmg of the property in order to give more detail. Patrick Mahoney, Attorney for Jesse Montelongo, 1000 Bayczn Woods, College StatiOIl, Texas. I~Ir. Mahoney stated that his client vas concerned with a planned multi-use development because It would decrease the value of his .business. ~Ir. Mahoney spoke in opposition of the rezoning. Jesse 14lontelongo, Jr. 5002 Commomvealth Ct~urt, College Station, 'T'exas. ~Ir. i~Iontelongo stated that he opposed the rezoning because Montelongo's Jewelry would be completely- • surrounded by Itiir. Knox's development and he felt that it would detract from his business. 1lrthur Wright, 10013 Holt, .College Station, 'Texas. 1~1r. Wright stated that the rezoning would disturb the domestic tranquility of the residences ui the area. Itlr. Wright spoke in opposition of the rezoning. Prochazka stated that while there are non-residential architectural standards that apply to any non-residential development with the City, there is an exception for themed developments. Prochazka stated that either the development would have to meet the NRA requurements or they would have to show material requirements to the Design Review Board. Commissioner Nichols asked for clarification regarding the land use plan and the definition of re-development. Prochazka read the definition of re-development according to the Unified Development Ordinance. Prochazka also gave clarification on the definition of mined-use. Commissioner White motioned to approve the rezoning of the property to PMUD. Commissioner Nichols seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). 7. Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Conditional Use Permit for a Night Club, located in Suite D at 2551 Texas Avenue South in the Homestead Place Shopping Center. Case #05-39 (LB/MH) Lindsay Boyer, Staff Planner, gave a presentation regarding a Conditional Use Permit for • I--Iookah Station, a proposed Nightclub. Boyer stated that staff recommended approval of the request and that the night club met the 300-foot separation distance from a church, public school, or a public hospital required for the sale of alcohol. Boyer stated that the P&Z Minutes Regular Agenda, April 19, 2005 Page 3 of 5 distance is measured from the front door of the establishment to the front door of the protected use, and that the distance from the vacant lease space to the church was over G00- • feet. Boyer stated that had received six phone calls since the date of the staff report, flue were inquiries and one was in opposition based on limited parking. James Heflin, Pastor, College Station Baptist Church, 2555 Texas Avenue South, College Station, Texas. ]'actor Heflin had questions regarding the notification process and the measurement of separation distances for alcohol permits. Pastor Heflin also expressed concerns regarding limited parking and potential overflow parking that could end up in the Church's parking lot, and operating hours of the night club. Chairman Shafer asked for clarification regarduig the separation, :distance requirement For alcohol permits. Boyer stated drat the State ordinance specified how the separation distance was measured. Boyer stated that essentially it is as the pedestrian would walk froth the front door of the establishment to the front door of a protected use. Chairman Shafer also asked for clarification regarding the 200-foot notification ring. Boyer stated that the notification ring was measured from all edges of the property. Ed Goff, Treasurer of College Station Baptist Church. IYir. Doff had concerns with traffic, parking and the distance from the Church and tught club: Mr. Goff spoke in opposition to the night club. David Alexander, .Alexander Properties; Bryan. Haggle, Applicant and dike Cutter, r1t Home Properties all spoke in favor of 'the night club. Mr. Alexander stated that the parking situation at that shopping center had always been managed and it was not an issue. I~Ir. • f-Iaggle spoke about the night club and its operating hours, and stated that he clid not feel parking would be a problem. Commissioner White asked i£ there vas anyone at the hearing from the adjoining mobile home park. Boyer stated that she had spoken to the owner of the mobile home park and that they did not°have at~y opposition to the night club because of its size. Commissioner White stated. that he agreed with the concerns of the Church regarding the nightclub's opening hours on Sunday. Commissioner White asked I~Ir. Haggle if they were willing to delay their opening holes on Sunday. IV1r. Haggle stated that they were. Carla 1Zcbinson, Senior .City Attorney stated that the City could not place conditions related to hours: of operation on the permit because the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission regulated that aspect of a Nightclub. Doug Bryan, 3824 Park Hampton, Bryan, Texas. Mr. Bryan spoke in opposition to the nightclub because of alcohol service and limited parking. Commissioner Fedora motioned to approve the Conditional Use Permit. Commissioner Nichols seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). 8. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items - A Planning and Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific • factual information or the recitation of existing polity may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. P&Z Minutes Regular Agenda, April 19, 2005 Page 4 of 5 i Joey Dunn, Planning & Development Services Director, stated that the upcoming Department Forum would be held on Monday, May 16, 2005, and that Commissioners • would receive notice. 9. 1ldjourn. Commissioner White motioned to adjourn. Commissioners Nichols seconded the motion, motion passed (5-0). Approved: Scott Shafer, Chairman Planning and %oning Commission Attest: Lisa Lindgren, Staff Assistant Planning and Development Services • • P&Z Minutes Regular Agenda, April 19, 2005 Page 5 of 5 +C'ity of ~'ollege ,Station Absence Request Form Far Elected and Appointed Officers Name: ~+F 5 Request Submitted on: f `~ ~ I will not be in attendance at the meeting of: t ~ ~ S' for the reasons} specified: (D e} • ~/~-- d k-- ~ ~. ~ -~ It .s'~ 1-Je !'t (Si e) Thts t~equest shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Board one-week,~vr r t meeting date. • STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Trey Fletcher, Sr. Planner Date of Report: 4-21-2005 Email: tletcher _cstx.gov Date of Meeting: 5-5-2005 Item: Public hearing, presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Replat and Preliminary Plat for the Century Hill Development consisting of 15 of lots on 36.92 acres, generally located at 1595 Sebesta Road, east of the Earl Rudder Freeway (SH 6). (04-263) Applicant: Garrett Engineering - DeAnna Ordonez, for owner, Brazos Valley Construction Inc. and Stephanie Sale Singleton Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat as submitted. Item Summary: This item is for the consideration of a Preliminary Plat for Century Hill Development. The proposed plat includes Lot 2 of the Agency Records Control subdivision. Lots 1-8, 13 and 14 are currently zoned C-1, General Commercial. The remaining lots (9-12 and 15) are zoned M-1, Light Industrial. The • development proposes to construct two (2) collector roadways: • Pavilion Avenue will connect Sebesta Road to the SH 6 Northbound Frontage Road, and • Coreusier Circle will, according to the Thoroughfare Plan, extend from Pavilion Avenue to Emerald Parkway. This plat received approval from the Planning & Zoning Commission in 2002, but the plat expired. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: Land Use Plan: As per the Mixed Use Opportunities Study in 2003, this area was designated on the Land Use Plan as Regional Retail, with a limited amount of Office along Sebesta. Prior to this it was shown for Mixed Use and Office. The extent of future office uses was unchanged. Thoroughfare Plan: The subject area is located along Sebesta Road, a Minor Collector and SH 6. No additional rights-of-way are necessary. A Minor Collector is shown on this parcel connecting Sebesta Road to Emerald Parkway. The development of Pavilion Avenue and Coreusier Circle will fulfill implementation requirements of the Thoroughfare Plan. • Special Area Plans: This parcel was considered in the East Bypass Small Area • Action Plan (2000) as well as the Mixed Use Opportunities Study (2003). Sidewalks: Sidewalks are required on both sides of the collector streets. Sidewalks along Sebesta will be constructed as those lots develop. Compliance with rezoning conditions: A zoning map amendment (rezoning) application has been filed requesting to rezone the C-1, General Commercial lots to M-1, Light Industrial. The application is on hold pending compliance with the Land Use Plan element of the Comprehensive Plan. Compliance wlSubdivision Regulations: This request is in compliance with the City's Subdivision Regulations. Annexed: Portions of the parcel along SH 6 were annexed in 1971, the remainder in 1977. Platted: The M-1 area was previously platted as Lot 2 of Agency Records Control. This tract has since been illegally subdivided (shown as Lot 15 on the proposed plat). The C-1 area has not been previously platted. Zoned: Lots 1-8, 13 and 14 are zoned C-1, and Lots 9-12 and 15 are zoned M- • 1. Development activity in vicinity: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment is being considered in the area. Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial 3. Application 4. Infrastructure and Facilities 5. Copy of Preliminary Plat 6. Thoroughfare Plan of Area • ~i/pJ an ~ // ~ `/ - ^ / ~ .a 1 ~A rac~m c~-1 -ao ~,~ /~ '~ / 1~1~- / =~ 1 ~ -~• jrr ~ ~; °r/ b rd} ~ ~~ ~i '~s ..~~ ~ ~ ~~ ,,, ~ ~ ' ., 1 I ~ ~ i ~ O ~ ' ~~ ~,. ' ~ ~; / / /`~ h ~ _ O ~ .y / \a ~F~~ ~ w ~ ay t ~ `~ ~ ~ V. -y ~ ti f.+ ~ '~ , x \: -D .. ~T of ~ 1 \ o ~:. (uinCr°l wM`33h.f N30U?iJ ~2iV3) - 9 A,Mc+ 31415 ~~~------111 nr ~~ ^^ h m ,J ~ ~ K b ~~ 1 y v -- ~ a ~ w O +~ V 8 _ ~ A 4tl~ ~, ~V ~ N ti d" 'v O a Z y ti o q~~ tb ~ ~ v ' fop ~ a ~ ~ p nor t. _ ti N G1 v ~s W _ °' °° s a + ~^ u ~} R i„ E o ~ ~ ~ KKi 6~ ~ y ~' 9+ ~ e / . w \ v o ~' °~ v,. ti _ )r0.I m ~ b ~ -~ ~ y ~ V r y ~ - t"~ N g ~ U _~_ .. ~ S^~ . IOt6 q. Y _ ~. v O l n ~~~1 ~1 N_ b ~ ~ ~ ~ U a ,. ^ 9~ ~' /% n ti ` ao- mti'6 -- n ,ors ,~`Mgf` '~'~~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ 2 v ,~` ti o '~~ ~" '~ a ;,~ ~~e `~ -; '~~ '~~ ~. v ;, 4 [M yU SF ~„°s~I ~~ b` y e ~. ~'O r ~ 1101 it ~ 0 '~ l'Q ~~ ~.; ,~~ b`~~~o ,_ ~,~,~ ~cn a ` ~ i.~04i „ aft X03} ~` ~9 J9 ~ q ~ V ® ~~ \\\ `~ ~ s ~ ~ 04i18i05 09:14 GARRETT ENGINEERING -~ 9797643496 ~' . I~e.Ui~oQ j~, P01 ~ -1 1 ~.~ ~ ~r~ FOR OFFICE USE QN Y ~ P&Z GA3E NO.:~' c~ gA't•E SUBMITTED: PR~LIMiNA~X PLAT APPLICAI"ION The following items must be submitted by an established fling deadline date for P 8~ Z Commission consideration. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REpUIREMENTS: X Filing Fee of $400.0(}. Variance Request to Subdivision Regula~tians ~ $100 (if applicable) X Application completed in full. X Thirteen {13) foiled copies of plat. (A revised mylar original must be submitted after staff review.) NIA One {1) copy of the approved Master Plan if applicable. X A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. N/A f:tezanina Application if zone change is proposed. Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks & Recreation Board, please provide proof of approval (if aoolicablel_ Date of !'reapplication Con#erenaet NQn® • NAME OF SUBDIVISION Centurv Hi~ {I Development SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION Agproximently 700 ft North of the intersection Of ebesta Ro d and the feeder road of North Earl Rudder Freewr3v .fate Highway 6) T APPLICANTlPROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): Name Garrett En ineerin - D a z Street Address 4444 Caner Creek Parkway Suite 10 City ~rvan State Texas Zip Cade 77802 E-Mail Address admin garrettonline net Phone Number 879 848-2688 Fax Number 79 846-3Q84 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION (ALL owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple owners): Name Bra os Valle onstruction Inc. - Em nuel I 'n Jr. Pres' Street Address 450 arter reek Parkwa Suits 101 City Aryan State __ Texas ,_. Zip Code 7705 E-Mai! Address Phone Number L979) 846 - 887$ ,.- ~ Fax Number 9( 78) 84g _ 07g3 PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION ~ owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet for multiple owners): Name Ste hanie Sal® i leton • Street Address 8300 Turkey Creek ___ City Ile a Station State Texas zip Code 77~ E-Mail Address Phone Number 978 846-8300 Fax Number 79 84 -8382 04i18i05 09:15 GRRRETT ENGINEERING -~ 9797643496 D02 ARCHITECT QR ENGINEl;R'S INFORMATION: • Name Garrett Enaineer7na -Don Garrett Street Address 4444 Carter Creek Parkwav Suite 108 City Brvan_ State Te,~ xis Zip Code ~,78Q2 E-Mail Address admi _ d~rrettonllne.net f~hone Number 1979.846-288.$ Fax Number ~a79) 846.3084 Tote! Acres Qf Subdivision ~~.92 R-Q-V11 Acreage 2.835 To#al # Of Lots 15 Number Of Lots Sy Zoning District M-1 5 Lots (C1) - 10 Lots Floodplain Acreage None. Parkland dedication by acreage or fee? N/A A statement addressing any differences between the Preliminary Plat and approved Master Plan {if applicable) N/A Requested variances to subdivision regulations & reason for same None Requested oversize participation NIA Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Flnai Piat: • ACREAGE: # of Acres to be dedicated ~ # of acres in floodplain # of acres in detention # of acres in greenways OR FEE !N LIBU OF LAND: _~.__.__ # of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $558 ~$ __ {date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true and correct, The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City pf College Stafion of the above identified plat and attests that ~ respective owners have been identified vn this application. Signature and Title pate • • INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES Water required for plat: Public water must be extended to all lots as shown on plan. Water Service: Domestic and fire flow water lines to be extended for platting purposes. Sewer required for plat: Public sewer is to be extended to all lots, as shown on plan. Sewer to also be extended to adjacent CSL Tract. Sewer Service: To be provided to all building plots as required from a public line. Street(s) required for plat: A minor collector is required to connect Sebesta Road to Emerald Parkway. Pavilion and Coreusier will fulfill this requirement. Streets/Access: Determined by compliance with the Driveway Ordinance. • Off-site Easements required for plat: None known at this time. Drainage: Must comply with the Drainage Ordinance. Detention is shown on the proposed plat. Flood Plain: None. Impact Fees: None. Parkland Dedication Fees: None. ~J ~ f ~ ~ `• i ~ ~ ~~:. A +3. ~ ~ / ~ : O \ ~~yz+~~~r ..r •awn'amn.a.s _"h __._ V r ~. ~...~ ~f ~• „. ~. ~ stir. ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ • sr~,T ~iE ~,,• /K4 ~ ,, j ~ ff ~ Il Yr /' ~~'~ ~i~~`~r ,. l ~. ~ ,,l ~~ ~. ~ ~ ~~ '~ ~ _ -- s / ~ `~ , - .~' ~ a~ 4 ~ ;,~~,, ~ ,~ I4[ ~ 0• ~~ff da~:t O ~(~_ r ~, ~~• Q .~.~. ws R a ~~ ~~4'i. ~. -. ~ ~. fpQy_f m t \L ~ ~ ,. b ~ y ~r o gg ~~ r N ~, t,m _ ~ _,.~ ~, ,.~;; ~ ? ! .~% ~ ~~ ~ ' ~ ~.--~ r~ ~~ h~ ~ ~ _~ ~ [~ X yy } ~ r f~ ~ r ^ ~^ w1f0 fq p{ V nlfu w 0) SI io•1 9•.f ~ S3fC J:; ~, `V ~ ~ ..O Orb WOO ur ~n ry! r1q ryV~. ~ ~l ~)7N6 53M Tm~W315~ r Q w • ~»pr `r.4U~y0M ~ AVjiYp tll~ AKV i ~ ~' ~ \ '^ ~rw W,rw6Sf^~) N Ogi~ia L W~ 'r . \\YY~~ T .Y/S l.~ lif M nt uwoa ,lywo+U iw C * ~ . -.~ 3 `,f~ ` /~ • r - w • v q ~l :wwaa ~~i.»7 ~lww.P wn o~ ~ ~' <+..~'.c w.. w..., , +sr. ~!'~ +W ri.~ 1° f++?I w~ h t f +.^a M ~ ~ V t ~ O rVl u~x wuoproaoo W W 1uW '~ w w+wr rtpgr. ~ In fo am ~ u ~~ fw,es iw.n~ ,~ s r -.f+n x.W n: r.r~+a~+•wbr.W rh lry: pc ~..~wn ocs~wi+pw ~ r.~oe ,j/ r ~,F~}o-... .. r.. ac ,...,,.' (rw) aqr swy wwm~r roar 'tMtn) xw6r f(_ ~ ~ ' ~.`. ` `/+Y.. ,+fw ~ ++~ ... , .~.... y.~. ~..~ ~d.v.t nwor! wn M a.Mnam+r ro f.e CI ~.~.n .a r+a - Regular Agenda 6 Presentation, discussion and possible action on a request to re-consider a rezoning within 180 days of denial for Callaway Subdivision Phase II, approximately 14 acres, located on the east side of Marion Pugh Drive, approximately 500' south of the intersection of George Bush Drive, including a portion of the Luther Street Right-of-~vay. Case #04-28 (JP) • CITY OF COLLEGE STATION • ' ~ ~ i ~' April 27, 2005 TO: Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Jennifer Prochazka, Staff Planner SUBJECT: Callaway Phase II Rezoning .7 The City Council denied the requested R-6 High Density Multi-Family rezoning for the property located along the east side of Marion Pugh Drive at their April 14, 2005 meeting. According to Section 3.2 of the Unified Development Ordinance, if a rezoning is denied by the City Council, another rezoning request for the same property cannot be considered by the City within 180 days of the date of denial unless the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that one of the following factors is applicable: 1. There is a substantial change in circumstances relevant to the issues and/ or facts considered during review of the application that might reasonably affect the decision-making body's application of the relevant review standards to the development proposed in the application; 2. New or additional information is available that was not available at the time of the review that might reasonably affect the decision-making body's application of the relevant review standards to the development proposed; 3. Anew application is proposed to be submitted that is materially different from the prior application (e.g., proposes new uses or a substantial decrease in proposed densities and intensities); or • 4. The final decision on the application was based on a material mistake of fact. Home of Texas A&M University i The applicant's representative has submitted the attached letter for your review. If the Planning & Zoning Commission finds that one of the above criteria exists, the applicant may request rezoning of the property within the 180 day time period. • • Home of Texas A&M University !~' ' ^ G? CHARLES A. ELLISON, P. C. • ATTORNEYS AT LAW 302 HOLLEMAN DRIVE EAST SUITE 76 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840-7000 MAILING ADDRESS P.O. BOX 10103 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842-0103 CHARLES A. ELLISON TELEPHONE: (979) 696-9889 AMY L. CLOUGN' FACSIMILE: (979) 693-8819 BRADLEY T. SHARPE SUSAN E. GOODSON 'also licensed in Wisconsin April 22, 2005 VIA HAND DELIVERY Mr. Joey Dunn Development Services City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue S College Station, TX 77840 Re: Callaway Rezoning Dear Joey: I represent Callaway Development Corporation regarding the attempted rezoning of their land along Marion Pugh Drive. As you know, the Council declined the application for rezoning on Thursday, April 14, 2005. Please allow this letter to serve as a quest, pursuant to Article 3.2 E. 2 of the U.D.O., for the Planning & Zoning Commission (the "P&T'} to consider whether the w information submitted in this letter is sufficient to allow a new zoning application on the tract before the 6 month limit. After much consideration, my client, in response to concerns expressed by the Council, is willing, at its cost, to extend Marion Pugh Drive to Holleman over the right-of-way which is already owned by the City of College Station. The Council was quite concerned about the traffic and we believe that this new information might have reasonably affected their review of the rezoning application. Article 3.2 E. 2 allows a new rezoning application if the P&Z finds that the extension of Marion Pugh Drive to Holleman is additional information that was not available on April 14, 2005 and, if available, might reasonably have affected the Council's review of the rezoning request. Please allow this letter to serve as a request for a hearing before the PB~Z on May 5, 2005 to allow them to consider whether this new information might have reasonably affected the Council's decision. If the P&Z determines that this new information might have reasonably affected the Council's review, my client will resubmit their zoning application for another rezoning hearing before the P&Z and Council. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation in this matter. Ve truly yours, ~~~ Ch les A. Ellison AE: bg c: Page Callaway Regular Agenda 7 Public hearing, and presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat -Residential for Shenandoah Phase 19 (which includes a Replat of Lot 1 Block 11 and Lot 17 Block 8 from Shenandoah Phase 1). This final plat consists of 56 residential lots and an HOA common area on 19.486 acres generally located at 4000 Alexandria Ave. Case #05-46 (MH) • STAFF REPORT Project Manager: Molly Hitchcock Report Date: April 25, 2005 Email: mhitchcock a~cstx.gov Meeting Date: May 5, 2005 Item: Public hearing, and presentation, discussion, and possible action on a Final Plat - Residential for Shenandoah Phase 19 (which includes a Replat of Lot 1 Block 11 and Lot 17 Block 8 from Shenandoah Phase 1). This final plat consists of 56 residential lots and an HOA common area on 19.486 acres generally located at 4000 Alexandria Ave. Applicant: Edward Froehling Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the final plat. Item Summary: The area under consideration is zoned R-1 and is located south of Shenandoah Phase 1. The final plat adds cul-de-sacs to the southern ends of Windfree Drive and Tiffany Trail (which currently dead-end). It also adds a loop from the dead-end of Windswept Drive around to the alley between Windswept and Tiffany Trail. Hunter Creek Drive will be extended from Southern Plantation and will wrap to the west to meet up with Decatur Drive. • The property is zoned R-1 Single Family and is surrounded by developed R-1 to the north and west, undeveloped A-P Administrative-Professional and C-1 General Commercial to the east, and partially developed C-1 and M-1 Light Industrial to the south. The final plat is in compliance with the preliminary plat that was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission in October of 2004. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan shows this area as Single Family Residential Medium Density. Southern Plantation is a minor collector on the Thoroughfare Plan and Decatur Drive is a major collector. The Shenandoah Subdivision has met the parkland dedication requirement for this phase with the dedication of the park along Alexandria. The Park Development fee is still applicable on all proposed residential lots. A 5.54-acre tract is shown on the plat to be dedicated to the H.O.A. Commission Action Options: The options regarding the final ^ Approval ^ Denial Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map 2. Aerial • 3. Application 4. Copy of Final Plat The Commission has final authority over the final plat. plat are: • NOTIFICATION: Legal Notice Publication{s}: The Eagle; 4-19-05 Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 5-5-05 Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': 48 Response Received: There has been one general inquiry into this project. • C7 ~ \ ~ '~ I A .~_ ..y. _.. gtti ..9a r ~Cp U4 ~ ~ ~ T ~ ~ '~ \ ~ ~ f a}'~ ~ ~ ~ / , ~'-°y max' ~ A 0'x°4 C ~ . n / A ~ ~~ r ~ - ~ r J9S / n ~ on a, v/ '"rv _T ~ ~ ~/H:: / / ~ l .u ~ v~ -~ r ~i)~ ~t?sj Gx ~ ~ ~'~ a ti~\» ..' ~ ~< n ~ cc,~ ~b ~ /~k ~ ~ ~'S',~ r~c f ti ,~ ~' " j ev 1 artY~w ~ ~ A ~ ~ A-d OZ 1 :., .,i~ / `~~, ~ `c ~~ V /q /Er~C„ b „' ~'\~C _, /,~yhE~~» cr/c,~ ~~4t~i~'~t'~~o,~ ~- ~6C / ~ ~~ / / . i ~' ~ 4 a / ~ ,. _~ ~ SZ . / ~., rn r ~ ` / _ .(~ /~ ~~ - t ~Tt V v_/ / ~, ti 'ter c.,.,~ .fin `O ~ <t, r ~ "' c -. t ~ 1r r ~- 'n ~ ~, ~ r~ \, , 1 ' ~ nr ,^, ~ ~ r C n> ' ~ " ~ ~t a ~ y/y~~ T qp ~~ ~~ cry a> t ~, i~ ~o ~tl~C., c ~ ~ / l~ ~/ c~ ~~n, ~ ~~ ''. /cc".., ~!{~ ~ i 9L ~"/ ~~/ 4- /c r 4~r '~/ ` C1~ % ~ ca,r~ \~ .~~ ~ ti rii, +' .-r ~ , / pG - cr / ~ n ~~ + ~~ 4`~^c o~ ~ /,~,`~' N~ .~ / a `- ' ~ ~ /.: ~a5'r .1/~-.. ail, ~ } c' ~. ~ ~ ~ ~`~~tl ~ " ~ ~ ~~ y~~ ~~ c„ . ~jta§~/ ~ -~0 ~ , ,fib tipC ' ~ /'v ,. , l ~ L'r~i,. '~ c / (fl ti :k, ~ ~ ~,1 ~, Jpt 1 ~ .o ~y~C'i c» /'Fi ~ / c ~ ~ r :1 , 'r . rn 1~ ~/ ~ l n, ' / d~ ~„ -F / ~ 'r J:o ~ `i,*1 ~r a/ ~ _ 4v , ' ~ ?iy ;~ \ '( _°' C k. J A, s / .. t /~r C~v '~~ ~ b4 ... ~r ° < c..» /~. ti '.rte `~ ` ~.. oo~-. i~~ c~~ +a ,c ~~ /b /rFy /y c~ ; ~~~" s !)pit/~/~ tie ~ ~~ f ~ J 6 -rq~ ~, '' ~, / c5 ~t ~~ -~ r ~ b ' ` ^~ l sr `SAS s % ~o~ ~ a ~ fQ + ~ ~i ~ ~ ~~~ /. ' y ~~/ ~~ { ,o~~ ~ ~ ~„ ~~'~~ +~ ~ / ~~ '+d~ yob _ ~- ~.. ~,1~' ~a~ ~C ; f`"..~ ~ ~ `~ ~~,~°~ ~ ~`d~~~b ,fit ~ y !v i ,~'r~ ^v ~ ~ .. ~ cn ~~ , ~ry~; a ~0 ,~~'~ ~~0'~~ " / ~ti ~ + E a -.nom ~ ti ~t ~~ c, (~ ;;,'v ~/C,%.,"'~v +`+ ". /` ~v ~n1, ,~ w~U -?~~~p+ c..,~ ~ l~~N L'~o `~' b`,¢Ul ~4~c» b o ~ 9s '. ,~ ~ ty, ,,; ii `:' Q ~\ `p '~ C~~ ~' `U+ 7 U+ c_, W ` ~ v ti~ A o a ~ 'V ~ „~j+ 4' ..~ .> is ~ Y' ~ :: ~~ a ~ ,y ..~ Ly %., ~t ~ 0 ~ L`5~ ~ ~b /,, .~ U 0 C`. rir.~0 049 a +~` SU~vv^~ _ \r o+a:» ~ +~p+~~~~ ~~. rntUt .~ ~` a `A rn LSO ° a v L ,G ° t,,. / \`~ 4 ~ ti 1, \ + `+ d / ~ `\+~\ ~O~ ~ L ` ~ r / ` ~ + c a , ~ ~ ~~ ~ b o ~9I _ti n p ~+ ~ti ;' ~ V ~~ ti b <ti+ ~,~ / ~~~ ~ ` ` ~ ~. ~ ~,' ^~~ A ULL+ ~ ~ y~ S~\. H~ ~" ~ + L~' ~v yp~^/~l ~ , ~ i:,/ m ,~ ~; ,~ r R ~ ~ '/ ~ ~;: s~ ~ ~_ Z ~ 7 ,f {'. ~ . ~ '~ ~`~ ~ ~.. ~ ~- ,_ ~~~a . x . ~,, T~ ~1r~J ~ . i y ` ~~~~ m ~ _ Z ~a:''4 ~ f •. .~ o t Y ~~ ~ y,f a r i '_'~ $ro ~.,, ~. Z ~ F+- ~ t- ~ ~ ~ ~~ 1? ` ~,,: .. ~ /~ y . ,~ Z ~'~ i_ i ~~ ~. ~* , . ~~ ~ ' ~ ,eft y / 'Y CO ~ ~ ~,~ ~ ~ ~,• ~~ ~ „. ~.~~'~~ fad Y ,. .' a .~ ~Y ~~ ,.' ~(My n ~_, ~ ~ rt ~ ~},~, ~` r r ~~_ . ~ e` „ - ,~ ryY yr. ~~ .J ~T ~ y~ ~~ ~w _: c ` r, ~ . ri ~'?' ~~ .bfk 1'• ~~f / ji ''+ pit' ~ '. f~~ CIF` f>< ~ ~ ~ ~.. ~ ''r~ • sd ` '. -i .,~~ .-• `r ~ F ~Y .(~. ~~''~'~ ~ r ~ ~'~' ~ t ` ~ ~ ' a ~~ ,., f ~`~_~~. - ~ f ~ ~~ t r d ~~'~ ,,~ • - J l5 yy 3 _ r ~y ~v. Tr.!~.~ f i !~ e ~; V ~ ~Y f ~ _. ~ , ~ f~ + ~ ... ~ ~ ryti ff \ r/'~~ i l 1. \Q'! 1 'cif ]. ~ ,. ,YT... ~~b~-~~ FOR OFFICE USE O LY PSZ Case No.: ~= Date Submitted: ~!"~ ""~~ FINAL PLAT APPLI~ w~r~nwi n ~ ~v~v (Check one) ^ Amending ®Final ^ Vacating ^ Replat ($300.00} ($400.00) ($400.00) ($600.00)* *Includes public hearing fee The following items must be submitted by an established filing deadline date for P&Z Commission consideration. MINIMUM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ® Final plat review and filing fee (see above) NOTE: Multiple Sheets ~ $55.00 per additional sheet N/A Variance Request to Subdivision Regulations ~ $100 (if applicable) ~ Development permit fee of $200.00 (if applicable). Infrastructure inspection fee of $600.00 (applicable if any public infrastructure is being constructed) N/A All replats must be accompanied with a copy of the deed restrictions/covenants for this plat. ® Thirteen (13) folded copies of plat. (A signed mylar original must be submitted after staff review.) ® One (1) copy of the approved Preliminary Plat and/or one (1) Master Plan (if applicable). ® Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and College Station I.S.D. ® A copy of the attached checklist with all items checked off or a brief explanation as to why they are not. N/A Two (2) copies of public infrastructure plans associated with this plat (if applicable). N/A Parkland Dedication requirement approved by the Parks 8 Recreation Board, please provide proof of approval (if applicable). AAME OF SUBDIVISION Shenandoah. Phase 19 SPECIFIED LOCATION OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION (Lot & Block) to the east of the intersection of Southern Plantation and Decatur APPLICANT/PROJECT MANAGER'S INFORMATION (Primary Contact for the Project): Name Edward Froehling & Ed Froehling Builder Inc. E-Mail Street Address 3887 High Lonesome Road City College Station State TX Zip Code 77845 Phone Number 979.776.8266 Fax Number 979.774.0565 CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION: (All owners must be identified. Please attach an additional sheet, if necessary) Name Edward Froehling E-Mail Street Address (same as above) City Phone Number ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S INFORMATION: Fax Number Zip Code Name McClure & Browne Engineering/Surve~ng Inc E-Mail mikem(a~tca.net Street Address 1008 Woodcreek Drive Suite 103 ~ity College Station State TX Zip Code 77845 Phone Number 979.693.3838 State Fax Number 979.693.2554 1-Aug-02 1 of 5 Acreage Total Property 19.476 acres Total # Of Lots 56 lots R-O-W Acreage 2.758 ac. Existing Use: Vacant Proposed Use: Residential umber Of Lots By Zoning District RR=1 / 56 verage Acreage Of Each Residential Lot By Zoning District: R-1 / 0.20 ac. Floodplain Acreage -0- acres A Statement Addressing Any Differences Between The Final Plat And Approved Master Development Plan And/Or Preliminary Plat (If Applicable): None Requested Variances To Subdivision Regulations ~ Reason For Same: None Requested Oversize Participation: None Total Linear Footage of Proposed Public: 2127 LF Streets (Alley) 1231 LF Sidewalks 1394 LF Sanitary Sewer Lines 1664 LF Water Lines 0 Channels 60 LF Storm Sewers 0 Bike Lanes 1 Paths Parkland Dedication due prior to filing the Final Plat: ACREAGE: # of acres to be dedicated + 60 x $358 = $ development fee # of acres in floodplain # of acres in detention # of acres in greenways OR FEE IN LIEU OF LAND: # of Single-Family Dwelling Units X $556 = $ # of Multi-Family Dwelling Units X $452 = $ (date) Approved by Parks & Recreation Board NOTE: DIGITAL COPY OF PLAT MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO FILING. The applicant has prepared this application and certifies that the facts stated herein and exhibits attached hereto are true, correct and complete. The undersigned hereby requests approval by the City of College Sfation of the above-identified final plat and attests that this request does not amend any covenants or restrictions associ d with this plat. S' nature n it l~JatCT. E ~t~ii~16,~,e. Date 1-Aug-02 2 of 5 SUPPLEMENTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT INFORMATION Application is hereby made for the following development specific waterway alterations: Subdivision Construction in the Sig Creek Tributary OWLEDGMENTS: I, Michael R. McClure P.E. ,design engineer/owner, hereby acknowledge or affirm that: The information and conclusions contained in the above plans and supporting documents comply with the current requirements of the City of College Station, Texas City Code, Chapter 13 and its associated Drainage Policy and Design Standards. Design Engineer As a condition of approval of this permit application, I agree to construct the improvements proposed in this application according to these documents and the requirements of Chapter 13 of the College Station City Code. CERTIFICATIONS: Contractor A. I, ,certify that any nonresidential structure on or proposed to be on this site as part of this application is designated to prevent damage to the structure or its contents as a result of flooding from the 100-year storm. Engineer Date • I, certify that the finished floor elevation of the lowest floor, including any basement, of any residential structure, proposed as part of this application is at or above the base flood elevation established in the latest Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Study and maps, as amended. Engineer C. I, Michael R. McClure. P.E. ,certify that not diminish the flood-carrying capacity,' that such alterati s or development City Code, Ch t r 13 concerning e C~. * .. Engi eer ~gz. D. I, , do certif~lt~ year flood above elevation established in Study. Engineer Date tions or development covered by this permit shall adjoining or crossing this permitted site and requirements of the City of College Station of ~ ays and of floodways fringes. ~. /~ /oS 32740 used alterations do not raise the level of the 100 Federal Insurance Administration Flood Hazard Date Conditions or comments as part of approval: In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris m construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. All development tl be in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer for the above named project. II of the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of College Station shall apply. 1-Aug-OZ 3 of 5 ~~-I~"n1q~iJL`l-f ~}R5~ ~`~ SUBMIT APPLICATION AND THIS LIST CHECKED OFF WITH 13 FOLDED COPIES OF PLAT FOR REVIEW FINAL PLAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: ants based on field survey and marked by monuments and markers. [~" ~ 1. Drawn on 24" x 36" sheet to scale of 100' per inch or larger. 2. Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in relationship to College Station and its City Limits. No scale required but include north arrow. 3. Title. Block with the following information: ©' Name and address of subdivider, recorded owner, planner, engineer and surveyor. [/]~ Proposed name of subdivision. (Subdivision name & street names will be approved through Brazos County 911.) (Replats need to retain original subdivision name.) Date of preparation. [~, Engineer's scale in feet. Q~ Total area intended to be developed. 4. North Arrow. [~ 5. Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines. h 6. If more than 1 sheet, an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or larger. 7. All applicable certifications based on the type of final plat. Ownership and Dedication Surveyor and/or Engineer City Engineer (and City Planner, if a minor plat) [~ Planning and Zoning Commission (delete if minor plat) [v]im Brazos County Clerk sta. ~ Brazos County Commissioners Court Approval (ETJ Plats only) [/~ 8. Paid tax certificates. [t~ 9. If submitting a replat where there are existing improvements, submit a survey of the subject property showing the improvements to ensure that no encroachments will be created. ~~ ~( 10. If using private septic systems, add a general note on the plat that no private sewage facility may be installed on any lot in this subdivision without the issuance of a license by the Brazos County Health Unit under the provisions of the private facility regulations adopted by the Commissioner's Court of Brazos County, pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.004 of the Texas Water Code. 11. Location of the 100 Year Floodplain and floodway, if applicable, according to the most recent available data. [-~ 12. Lot corner markers and survey monuments (by symbol) and clearly tied to basic survey data. 13. Matches the approved preliminary plat and/or master development plan. ~!. 14. The location and description with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii, area, center angle, degree of curvature, tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the following: (Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a boundary with the subdivision, as well as, those within the subdivision}. • Existin Proposed [~ [-~]~ Streets. Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac, stubbed out streets must end into a temp turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet. [~ [~ Public and private R.O.W. locations and widths. (All existing and proposed R.O.W.'s sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan.) [-~ [~ Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance. [~ [-~ Alleys. [~ Easements. []~ [~ A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block. ~j Greenbelt arealpark linkages/parkland dedication (All proposed dedications must be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Board prior to P & Z Commission consideration.) [~ 15. Construction documents for all public infrastructure drawn on 24" x 36" sheets and property sealed by a Licensed Texas Professional Engineer that include the following: [-~]~ Street, alley and sidewalk plans, profiles and sections. One sheet must show the overall street, alley and/or sidewalk layout of the subdivision. (may be combined with other utilities). [-~ Sanitary sewer plan and profile showing depth and grades. One sheet must show the overall sewer layout of the subdivision. (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas.) [~'" Water line plan showing fire hydrants, valves, etc. with plan and profile lines showing • depth and grades. One sheet must show the overall water layout of the subdivision. (Utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas.) Storm drainage system plan with contours, street profile, inlets, storm sewer and drainage channels, with profiles and sections. Drainage and runoff areas, and runoff based on 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 year rain intensity. Detailed drainage structure design, channel lining design & detention if used. One sheet must show the overall drainage layout of the subdivision. Detailed cost estimates for all public infrastructure listed above sealed by Texas P.E. [~ Drainage Report. [~ Erosion Control Plan (must be included in construction plans). [/~ 16. All off-site easements necessary for infrastructure construction must be shown on the final plat with a volume and page listed to indicate where the separate instrument easements were filed. Separate instrument easements must be filed prior or concurrently with Final Plat. -~ 17. Are there impact fees associated with this development? ^ Yes l~f No Impact fees for R-1, R-2, & R-3 zoned final plats, must be paid prior to filing. []~ 18. Will any construction occur in TexDOT rights-of-way? ^ Yes to If yes, TexDOT permit must be submitted along with the construction documents. NOTE: 1. We will be requesting the corrected Final Plat to be submitted in digital form if available prior to filing the plat at the Courthouse. 2. If the construction area is greater than 5 acres, EPA Notice of Intent (NOI) must be submitted prior to issuance of a development permit.